Filed by the Registrant  [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [   ]

Check the appropriate box:

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]	No fee required.

[   ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[   ]	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

Table of Contents

Philip Wm. Colburn

March 17, 2000

Dear Stockholder:

      You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Allen Telecom Inc. which will be held at the Cleveland Marriott East, 3663 Park East Drive, Beachwood, Ohio on Friday, April 28, 2000 at 9:30 A.M. The purposes of the meeting are set forth in the accompanying notice and proxy statement.

      WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.

	Sincerely,

	/s/ Philip Wm. Colburn

	PHILIP WM. COLBURN
	Chairman of the Board

Table of Contents

ALLEN TELECOM INC.

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 28, 2000

March 17, 2000

To the Common Stockholders of

      Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Allen Telecom Inc. will be held at the Cleveland Marriott East, 3663 Park East Drive, Beachwood, Ohio, on Friday, April 28, 2000, at 9:30 A.M., local time, for the following purposes:

	1.  To elect a Board of eight directors;
	2.  To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2000; and
	3.  To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

      The close of business on Wednesday, March 1, 2000 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

      PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. The giving of such proxy will not affect your right to revoke the proxy or to vote in person if you attend the meeting.

	By order of the Board of Directors
	LAURA C. MEAGHER
	Secretary

Table of Contents

ALLEN TELECOM INC.

March 17, 2000

      The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Allen Telecom Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 28, 2000, or at any adjournment thereof. Any proxy received pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the stockholder executing it by notifying the Secretary of the Company before it is voted at the Annual Meeting, by duly executing a proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

      The Board of Directors has fixed March 1, 2000 as the record date for the determination of holders of Common Stock, $1.00 par value, of the Company (“Common Stock”) entitled to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on that date, the Company had outstanding 27,901,910 shares of Common Stock (exclusive of 2,115,169 shares held in its treasury). Each share of Common Stock will be entitled to one vote at the meeting. Presence in person or by proxy of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock will constitute a quorum.

      At the Annual Meeting, the results of stockholder voting will be tabulated by the inspectors of election appointed for the Annual Meeting. Under Delaware law and the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and By-Laws, as amended, properly executed proxies that are marked “abstain” or are held in “street name” by brokers that are not voted on one or more particular proposals (if otherwise voted on at least one proposal) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been achieved at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to which such abstention applies. Broker non-votes will not be treated as a vote for or a vote against any of the proposals to which such broker non-vote applies.

      This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy are first being mailed on or about March 17, 2000.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

      Eight directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting and until their successors have been elected and qualified. The Board of Directors proposes election of the persons listed below, all of whom are currently directors. It is not contemplated that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director; however, if that should occur, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person or persons as are nominated by the Board of Directors, unless the Board reduces the number of directors to eliminate the vacancy. The eight nominees for director receiving a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy shall be elected.

Table of Contents

Information Regarding Nominees

2

Table of Contents

Information Regarding Board of Directors

      The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of its Board of Directors, whose members are elected annually by the stockholders. During 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company had Audit, Management Compensation and Nominating Committees. Currently, Dr. Conway, Dr. Roetter and Mr. Robinson are the members of the Management Compensation Committee; Dr. Conway and Messrs. Lyons and Colburn are the members of the Nominating Committee; and Messrs. McNiff, Lyons and Smith are the members of the Audit Committee.

      The Audit Committee recommends to the Board of Directors the appointment of the independent auditors and reviews the degree of their independence from the Company; approves the scope of the audit engagement, including the cost of the audit; reviews any non-audit services rendered by the auditors and the fees therefor; reviews with the auditors and management the Company’s policies and procedures with respect to internal accounting and financial controls and, upon completion of an audit, the results of the audit engagement; and reviews internal accounting and auditing procedures with the Company’s financial staff and the extent to which recommendations made by the internal audit staff or by the independent auditors have been implemented.

      The Management Compensation Committee recommends to the Board salaries and incentive compensation awards for officers of the Company and its subsidiaries; reviews and approves guidelines for the administration of incentive compensation programs for other management employees; makes recommendations to the Board with respect to major compensation programs; administers the Company’s 1982 Stock Plan, as amended (the “1982 Stock Plan”), the Company’s 1992 Stock Plan, as amended (the “1992 Stock Plan”), and the Company’s Key Management Deferred Bonus Plan (the “KMDB Plan”) and grants stock options and restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock under the 1992 Stock Plan; and issues the Report on Executive Compensation required to be included in the Company’s proxy statement by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Management Compensation Committee’s Report on Executive Compensation for 1999 is set forth on pages 6 to 8 of this proxy statement.

      The Nominating Committee selects and recommends to the Board nominees for election as directors and considers the performance of incumbent directors in determining whether to recommend them for nomination for re-election. The Nominating Committee has recommended the eight incumbent directors for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders for election at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that are submitted prior to the end of 2000 to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s offices, 25101 Chagrin Boulevard, Beachwood, Ohio 44122. Any such recommendation must be in writing and must include a detailed description of the business experience and other qualifications of the recommended nominee as well as the signed consent of such person to serve if nominated and elected.

      During 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company held six meetings, the Audit Committee held three meetings, the Management Compensation Committee held four meetings and the Nominating Committee held one meeting. All of the directors attended 75 percent or more of the meetings held by the Board of Directors and by the Committees on which they served during 1999.

3

Table of Contents

Compensation of Directors

      Each director of the Company (other than Messrs. Colburn and Lyons, who are consultants to the Company, and Mr. Paul, who is an employee of the Company) is paid $15,000 per year for his or her services as a director and $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended. Each member of the Audit Committee (other than Mr. Lyons) is paid $2,000 per year, each member of the Management Compensation Committee is paid $3,000 per year, and each member of the Nominating Committee (other than Messrs. Colburn and Lyons) is paid $1,000 per year, for his or her services as such member, and each such Committee member (other than Messrs. Colburn and Lyons) is paid $500 for each meeting of a Committee attended. Directors are not paid fees for their participation in meetings by conference telephone or for actions by unanimous written consent. Each director and Committee member is reimbursed for travel and related expenses incurred in attending meetings.

      The stockholders approved the Allen Telecom Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Option Plan”) at the Company’s 1994 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Directors Option Plan provides that each year, on the first Friday following the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, each individual elected, re-elected or continuing as a director who is not a current or former employee of the Company automatically receives a nonqualified stock option for 3,000 shares of Common Stock. The Directors Option Plan also permits discretionary grants to directors who are not current employees of, but were previously employed by, the Company.

      On April 30,1999, Dr. Conway, Dr. Roetter and Messrs. McNiff, Robinson and Smith each received a discretionary non-qualified stock option, not pursuant to the Directors Option Plan, for 3,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company held in the treasury of the Corporation at an exercise price of $9.3125 per share (Mr. Smith had previously received a non-qualified stock option for 4,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $5.375 upon his election to the Board of Directors on February 16, 1999). Each of the foregoing options expires 10 years from date of grant and is exercisable 50 percent after two years from date of grant, 75 percent after three years from date of grant and 100 percent after four years from date of grant. Also, each of the foregoing options becomes immediately exercisable upon the death of the optionholder prior to the expiration of such option or upon the cessation of such optionholder’s service as a director of the Company six months or more after the date of grant and prior to the expiration of such option.

      As mentioned in the Company’s 1999 proxy statement mailed to shareholders on March 19, 1999, on February 16, 1999, Mr. Colburn, Chairman of the Board of the Company, received a nonqualified stock option for 146,000 shares of Common Stock, and Mr. Lyons, Vice Chairman of the Board of the Company, received a nonqualified stock option for 37,000 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $5.375 per share, the market price on the date of grant. Each of these options expires on February 16, 2009. One Hundred Seven Thousand (107,000) of Mr. Colburn’s options, and 27,000 of Mr. Lyons’ options, are exercisable 50 percent after February 16, 2001, 75 percent after February 16, 2002 and 100 percent after February 16, 2003. Thirty-Nine Thousand (39,000) of Mr. Colburn’s options, and 10,000 of Mr. Lyons’ options, are exercisable 33 1/3 percent after February 16, 2000, 66 2/3 percent after February 16, 2001 and 100 percent after February 16, 2002. In addition, each of the foregoing options becomes immediately exercisable upon the death of the optionholder prior to the expiration of such option or upon the cessation of such optionholder’s service as a director of the Company six months or more after the date of grant and prior to the expiration of such option.

      The Company maintains a Matching Gift Program for the benefit of the directors of the Company. Pursuant to the Matching Gift Program, in 1999, the Company matched gifts to charitable organizations made by the directors in amounts up to $2,500 for each director.

      Mr. Colburn was employed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company until February 26, 1991, and as Chairman of the Board of the Company until December 31, 1991, pursuant to an employment agreement that was entered into in 1988. On December 31, 1991, Mr. Colburn elected to terminate his status as an employee of the Company (although he continues as Chairman of the Board of the Company) and to provide post-employment consulting services to the Company pursuant to his consulting agreement described below. Mr. Colburn’s employment agreement provides that the Company will continue to provide Mr. Colburn and his spouse medical and hospitalization benefits for their lives at least equal to the benefits they were entitled to while he was an employee of the Company and will provide life insurance coverage on Mr. Colburn for his life in an amount equal to five times his 1991 salary, which is the amount of life insurance that the Company provided to

4

Table of Contents

      Mr. Colburn’s employment agreement provides for mandatory arbitration of all disputes relating to his employment agreement, his post-employment consulting agreement described below or his supplemental pension benefit agreement described on page 14 hereof and requires the Company to pay all reasonable legal expenses incurred by Mr. Colburn in connection with resolution of disputes under the agreements.

      Pursuant to an agreement entered into in 1976, and subsequently amended, Mr. Colburn provided post-employment consulting services to the Company for several years prior to March 9, 1988, when he became Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and has provided and will continue to provide post-employment consulting services to the Company for an additional period that commenced upon termination of his employment, which was December 31, 1991, through December 31, 1998 and continuing thereafter for successive periods of 12 months each, unless either the Company or Mr. Colburn gives at least three months notice to the contrary. No such notice was given by either party in 1999. The agreement provides for the payment by the Company to Mr. Colburn annually, during the consulting period, of $248,605, increased each June 30 during the consulting period for increases in the consumer price index. During 1999, the Company paid Mr. Colburn $298,478 in consulting fees and furnished him an automobile at the Company’s expense. In addition, during the consulting period, the Company provides Mr. Colburn with furnished office space and support services while he is performing consulting services. During the consulting period, Mr. Colburn is required to furnish consulting services to the Company for up to 34 percent of his time each year, except when he is engaged in governmental service or charitable work, during which periods consulting services and compensation will be suspended, and he has agreed not to engage in or be employed by any business in competition with the Company during the term of his agreement. If the Company breaches any material provision of the consulting agreement and such breach continues for at least 30 days after notice to the Company, all benefits under the consulting agreement become nonforfeitable, and the Company will pay Mr. Colburn an amount equal to the present value of all remaining consulting compensation for the remaining consulting period.

      Pursuant to an agreement entered into in September 1989, as amended in 1990, Mr. Lyons provides post-employment consulting services to the Company for the period that commenced upon termination of his employment, which was September 30, 1989, through September 30, 1992 and continuing thereafter for successive periods of 12 months each, unless either the Company or Mr. Lyons gives at least three months notice to the contrary. No such notice was given by either party in 1999. The agreement provides for the payment by the Company to Mr. Lyons annually, during the consulting period, of $25,000. In addition, during the consulting period, the Company includes Mr. Lyons in the Company’s life, medical and hospitalization and disability insurance benefit plans and furnishes him an automobile at the Company’s expense. During the consulting period, Mr. Lyons is required to furnish consulting services to the Company for up to 10 percent of his time each year, and he has agreed not to engage in or be employed by any business in competition with the Company during the term of his agreement.

      The Company also has entered into supplemental pension benefits agreements and “Change in Control” agreements with Messrs. Colburn and Lyons. For a description of the terms of these agreements, see “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT — Retirement Plans — Other Supplemental Pension Benefits Agreements” and “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT — Employment, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements” on pages 14 to 16 of this proxy statement.

      For additional information with respect to the directors of the Company, see “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT — Transactions with Executive Officers and Directors” and “STOCK OWNERSHIP — Directors and Officers” on pages 19 and 20, of this proxy statement.

5

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

      Pursuant to the proxy rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission designed to enhance disclosure of corporations’ policies toward executive compensation, Dr. Conway (Chair), Dr. Roetter and Mr. Robinson, as members of the Management Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”), submit the following report outlining the Company’s compensation plans and policies as they pertain to Robert G. Paul, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and the other executive officers of the Company:

      The Company’s executive compensation plans have been designed to attract, retain and reward high caliber executives who will formulate and execute the business plans of the Company in a manner that will provide the stockholders of the Company with a satisfactory return while assuring that the Company’s executive compensation levels are fair and appropriate to both its executives and its stockholders. With these goals in mind, the Company’s compensation plans and policies have been designed to ensure that total executive compensation is linked significantly to the performance of the Company, as measured by both the operating performance of the Company and the increase in the value of its shares. Although the Compensation Committee recognizes that improvement in operating performance and higher stock prices do not necessarily move in tandem over the short term, we expect that the two measurements will correlate over the long term.

      The Compensation Committee regards stock ownership by the Company’s executive officers, encouraged by equity-based compensation plans, as an effective way to align the interests of the executive officers with those of the stockholders of the Company. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee does not plan to pay above-average base salaries to its executive officers. The Committee does expect to utilize performance-oriented and equity-based compensation to reward outstanding performance.

      By receiving some equity-based compensation during their term of employment by the Company, executive officers of the Company should become larger holders of Company stock. The use of equity-based compensation is intended to strengthen their identification with the stockholders of the Company and make increasing stockholder value a continuing focus for the Company’s management group. The Compensation Committee considers that equity-based compensation, combined with a focus on the operating performance of the Company, will have a long-term impact on improving the Company’s financial results and increasing its stockholder value.

  Measuring Performance

      The evaluation of the performance of the key executive officer group, and the Chief Executive Officer in particular, is primarily based on measurable criteria and, to a lesser extent, certain qualitative criteria. The measurable criteria include both the total return to stockholders, determined by changes in the stock price and any dividends which may be paid, and the financial performance of the business, determined by sales growth, the amount of earnings per share, the return on equity and the rate of increase in earnings per share.

      Because of the nature of many of the Company’s businesses and the desire to focus on long-term objectives, these criteria are measured over one-year, three-year, five-year and longer periods. When evaluating performance with regard to an increase in base salary, the Compensation Committee assigns more weight to longer-term results, i.e., three and five-year comparisons, than to the results of a single year. It also considers comparisons of salaries for similar positions in companies of comparable size, as well as changes in the cost of living. When determining an annual incentive bonus, the Compensation Committee places more weight on the performance of the year just completed, with significantly less weight on the longer-term results.

      The Company reported a loss of $.10 per share in 1999. This loss resulted in a negative return on equity. The stock price increased 73% from $6.6875 at year-end 1998 to $11.5625 at year-end 1999, representing a significant increase in stockholder value.

      The qualitative criteria utilized by the Board and Compensation Committee in evaluating the performance of the Company, the Chief Executive Officer and all other key executives of the Company, include but are not necessarily limited to:

6

Table of Contents

	(i)	the success of the Company in implementing and achieving its corporate strategic goals and the strategic goals of its individual businesses;

       (ii)  the success in the development of management depth;

	(iii)	the development and maintenance of timely communication and credibility with its stockholders, financial analysts and other outside audiences; and
	(iv)	other items specific to each individual or to a particular business objective.

      The corporate executives are paid annual incentive bonuses commensurate with the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the Company’s performance as described above. Two thirds of the 1999 maximum incentive bonus for the corporate executives was based on the Company’s 1999 earnings per share. The remaining one third was based on certain qualitative criteria, including exiting the unprofitable Marta Technologies, Inc. business, improving gross profit margins, Y2K success, reducing capital expenditures and improving working capital turnover, increasing shareholder value, and other qualitative criteria. 1999 was deemed to be partially successful and thus the corporate executives’ annual bonuses were based on 20% of their maximum.

      The annual performance bonuses for most of the senior managers who are responsible for specific operating businesses and subsidiaries within the Company are based primarily on the annual operating profits of their individual businesses as measured against their profit plans. Some non-financial objectives, mutually established by those executives and the Company’s corporate officers at the beginning of each year, are also evaluated.

  Compensation Study

      During 1997, the Compensation Committee engaged William M. Mercer Incorporated, a nationally recognized executive compensation consulting firm, to perform an extensive review of the Company’s executive compensation practices. This review included an examination of the Company’s practices and their consistency with general corporate practices and with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy. Mercer utilized a number of national compensation surveys and private databases for companies of similar size to the Company as well as specific analysis of the compensation information contained in proxy statements of a number of companies in similar industries.

      This study indicated that the Company’s actual compensation practice was consistent with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy, and competitive with the universe of companies used as comparators. As a result, the Company has not made any major changes to executive compensation.

  Basis for Chief Executive Officer’s Compensation

      Because of the business circumstances, no salary increases were granted during 1999 to Mr. Paul, the remaining corporate officers or the business heads.

      Mr. Paul was paid a performance bonus of $70,500 for 1999 equal to 16% of his salary. His employment agreement states that his performance bonus can range from 0% to 80% of base salary. Two thirds of his bonus was to be based on earnings per share targets which were not accomplished, and the remaining one third was based on previously described criteria.

      In January 1999, Mr. Paul was granted a non-qualified option for 145,000 shares at $8.00 per share, the market price on the date of grant.

  Compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

      Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted in 1993, generally disallows a tax deduction to a public corporation for compensation over $1 million paid to the corporation’s chief executive officer and four other most highly compensated executive officers. Qualifying performance-based compensation will not be subject to the cap if certain requirements are met. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors intend to structure the compensation of its executive officers in a manner that should ensure that the Company does not lose any tax deductions because of the $1 million compensation limit in the foreseeable future.

7

Table of Contents

      The Company’s salaries for its highest paid executives will be set, based on independent studies, at levels approximating the average for companies of comparable size in similar industries and, when added to annual bonus targets, are not expected to approach $1 million in the foreseeable future. The Company has been an early proponent of using more equity-based compensation, which can often be designed to ensure that tax deductibility is not compromised.

      In February 1995, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the 1992 Stock Plan incorporating maximum limitations on individual annual stock option and restricted stock grants so as to meet the requirements of Section 162(m). They also amended the 1992 Stock Plan to identify the performance measures to be used if the Compensation Committee decides to use performance-based vesting restricted stock in the future to meet the requirements of Section 162(m). These amendments were approved by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s 1995 Annual Meeting.

      The incentive restricted stock grants made by the Company in 1993 and thereafter contain both time-based vesting and provisions for performance-based acceleration, and therefore are subject to the $1 million cap. These restricted stock grants, however, include provisions to ensure that the amount vested in any one year will not place the individual’s earnings over the $1 million cap. The 1992 incentive restricted stock grants were grandfathered under Section 162(m). Thus, no tax deduction will be lost to the Company as a result of these restricted stock grants.

	Respectfully submitted,
	Dr. Jill K. Conway, Chair
	Charles W. Robinson
	Dr. Martyn F. Roetter

Annual and Long-Term Compensation

      The following table sets forth the annual and long-term compensation paid or accrued by the Company and its subsidiaries to those persons who were (i) the Chief Executive Officer and (ii) the other four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”), for services rendered by them in all capacities in which they served the Company and its subsidiaries during 1997, 1998 and 1999.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

8

Table of Contents

(a)	Mr. Schroeder became an executive officer of the Company on February 16, 1999. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules regarding the disclosure of executive compensation, no information is required to be provided for prior years during which Mr. Schroeder was not an executive officer.

(b)	Aggregate amount of such compensation is less than the lesser of $50,000 or 10 percent of the total annual salary and bonus reported for such Named Executive Officer under “Salary” and “Bonus” for such fiscal year.

(c)

At December 31, 1999, the Named Executive Officers held 73,705 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock in the aggregate, which are subject to forfeiture under certain circumstances for periods up to 10 years with an aggregate value (calculated by multiplying the number of restricted shares held by $11.5625, the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 1999) of $852,214 as follows: Mr. Paul (28,939 shares with a value of $334,607), Mr. Youdelman (18,190 shares with a value of $210,322), Mr. deVilliers (15,000 shares with a value of $173,438) and Mr. LePorte (11,576  shares with a value of $133,847). Dividends are paid on restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the same rate as paid on other outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock. No dividends were paid on the Company’s Common Stock in 1997, 1998 and 1999.

(d)

These restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock were awarded under the 1992 Stock Plan, and will vest 25 percent on December  31 in each of the years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, unless accelerated vesting is achieved. Accelerated vesting based on achieving certain stock price and earnings per share targets cannot begin until the year 2000, and such shares will then vest only when the following targets have been reached:

(e)

All Other Compensation includes $1,600 made as matching contributions for Messrs. Paul, Youdelman, deVilliers and LePorte and $1,240 made as a matching contribution for Mr.  Schroeder under the Company’s Employee Before-Tax Savings Plan for 1999, and $1,200 made as matching Company contributions for each of the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s Employee Before-Tax Savings Plan for each of 1998 and 1997. In addition, All Other Compensation includes (i) insurance premiums in the following amounts paid by the Company with respect to term life insurance for the benefit of each of the Named Executive Officers during each of 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, as applicable: Mr. Paul ($51, $84 and $84), Mr. Youdelman ($51, $84 and $84), Mr. deVilliers ($51, $1,260 and $1,109), Mr. LePorte ($51, $84 and $84), and Mr. Schroeder ($617), and (ii) the following amounts equal to the net dollar value of the remainder of the premiums paid by the Company in connection with life insurance policies issued pursuant to the Split Dollar Insurance Agreements between the Company and the following Named Executive Officers during 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively: Mr. Paul ($42,310, $42,719 and $79,010), Mr. Youdelman ($59,660, $44,754 and $68,380), Mr.  LePorte ($7,426, $8,120 and $17,296) and Mr.  deVilliers ($14,906, $0 and $0). The premiums paid by the Company in connection with the life insurance policies issued pursuant to such Split Dollar Insurance Agreements set forth in the preceding sentence generally will be recovered in full by the Company upon the cancellation or purchase by a Named Executive Officer of any such life insurance policy or the payment of any death benefits under any such life insurance policy.

9

Table of Contents

Options Granted in 1999

      The following table sets forth information with respect to grants of options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Named Executive Officers during 1999 pursuant to the Company’s 1992 Stock Plan.

OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

(a)

Each of these options was granted on January 12, 1999. Each of these options is exercisable 50 percent after two years from date of grant, 75 percent after three years from date of grant and 100 percent after four years from date of grant. If the optionee’s employment by the Company or any of its subsidiaries terminates for any reason, this option may be exercised to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination of employment within three months after such termination of employment. If the optionee dies within such three-month period or if the termination of his employment is due to his death, this option may be exercised within one year after his death. Each of these options contains a tandem stock appreciation right providing that the Company will, if requested by the optionee prior to the exercise thereof and if approved by the Compensation Committee, purchase that portion of the option which is then exercisable at a price equal to the difference between the exercise price and the market price of the shares. The purchase price may be paid by the Company in either cash or Common Stock of the Company, or any combination thereof, as the Compensation Committee may determine. In addition, each of these options contains a tandem limited stock appreciation right exercisable six months after grant and immediately after a “Change in Control” of the Company (as defined below on page 16 of this proxy statement). Pursuant to this tandem limited stock appreciation right, the Company will purchase the option for cash at a price equal to the difference between the exercise price and the “market value” (as defined in the 1992 Stock Plan) of the shares covered by the option. Such market value generally is defined to relate to the highest market value of the Company’s Common Stock during the period in which the circumstances giving rise to the exercise of the limited stock appreciation right occurred.

(b)

The dollar amounts set forth in the columns are determined as of the date of grant of such options and are the result of calculations of the 5% and 10% assumed stock price appreciation rates set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules regarding the disclosure of executive compensation, and therefore are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation of the Company’s Common Stock. Actual gains, if any, on the exercise of options are dependent on the future performance of the Company’s Common Stock, as well as the applicable Named Executive Officer’s continued employment throughout the vesting period.

Option Exercises and 1999 Year-End Values

      The following table sets forth information with respect to (i) options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock granted under the Company’s 1982 Stock Plan and 1992 Stock Plan, respectively, which were exercised by the Named Executive Officers during 1999, and (ii) unexercised options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock granted under the Company’s 1982 Stock Plan and 1992 Stock Plan, respectively, to the Named Executive Officers and held by them at December 31, 1999.

10

Table of Contents

AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND

(a)	Named Executive Officer did not exercise any options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock during 1999.

(b)	The dollar values are calculated by determining the difference between the fair market value of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock underlying the options and the exercise price of such options at exercise or at December 31, 1999, as applicable.

Retirement Plans

     Corporate Retirement Plan

      Participants in the Allen Telecom Inc. Corporate Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) consist of a majority of the full-time employees of the Company and its subsidiaries in the United States, including the Named Executive Officers, and Messrs. Colburn, Lyons and McNiff as former employees of the Company. The Retirement Plan generally provides a retirement benefit based upon the participant’s years of credited service (not in excess of 30 years) and his or her final average earnings, with final average earnings consisting of the sum of (i) the average of the salaries of the participant during the five years of highest salaries of the participant in the 10 years preceding the participant’s retirement or termination date, and (ii) the average of the performance bonuses and overtime earnings of the participant during the five years of highest aggregate bonuses and overtime earnings of the participant in the 10 years preceding the participant’s retirement or termination date. Retirement benefits are payable either as a straight life annuity, a joint and survivor annuity or in other optional forms. Normal retirement is at age 65, but certain early retirement benefits may be payable to participants who have attained age 55 and completed 10 years of continuous service, and survivor benefits may be payable to the surviving spouse of a vested participant who dies prior to early or normal retirement. A participant’s benefit under the Retirement Plan vests after five years of credited service, all benefits funded by the Company are based upon actuarial computations, and no contributions are made by participants.

     Restoration Plan

      The Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”) imposes a maximum limit on annual retirement benefits payable under tax-qualified retirement plans, such as the Retirement Plan. For 2000, that annual limit is $135,000. In addition, the IRC limits the amount of annual compensation that may be taken into account for benefit calculation purposes under tax-qualified retirement plans. For 2000, that annual limit is $170,000. Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted the Allen Telecom Inc. Restoration Plan (the “Restoration Plan”). Under the Restoration Plan, each employee whose Retirement Plan benefit is limited by these IRC restrictions or as a result of his deferral of income under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan will be entitled to a supplemental restoration benefit equal to the difference between the full amount of his pension benefits determined under the Retirement Plan (calculated without regard to these IRC restrictions or to deferral of income under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan) and the maximum amount payable from the Retirement Plan. If (i) the Company breaches any material provision of the Plan and such breach continues for at least 30 days after notice to the Company, or (ii) the Company makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or (iii) any proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is instituted by or against the Company and, if instituted against the Company, is consented to or acquiesced in by it or the Company fails to use its best efforts to obtain the dismissal

11

Table of Contents

     Pension Benefits Table

      The following table shows estimated annual benefits payable under the Retirement Plan and the Restoration Plan to participants in specified compensation (final average earnings) and years-of-service classifications on a straight life annuity basis, assuming normal retirement at age 65 on January 1, 2000 and application of the current U.S. social security covered compensation base. The benefits payable under the Retirement Plan and the Restoration Plan are not subject to any deduction for U.S. social security or other offset amounts.

(a)

The current final average earnings for the named Executive Officers during 1999 are $669,800 for Mr. Paul, $383,840 for Mr.  Youdelman, $163,529 for Mr. deVilliers, $237,600 for Mr. LePorte and $133,050 for Mr. Schroeder. The calculation of the foregoing amounts includes the amounts shown under “Salary” and “Bonus” in the Summary Compensation Table set forth on pages 8 and 9 of this proxy statement.

(b)	Years of credited service as of January 1, 2000 under the Retirement Plan for the Named Executive Officers are 29.9 for Mr. Paul, 22.9 for Mr. Youdelman, 8.8 for Mr. deVilliers, 18.8 for Mr. LePorte and 18.5 for Mr. Schroeder.

     Target Benefit Agreements

      The Company has entered into separate Supplemental Target Pension Benefit Agreements (each, a “Target Agreement”) with six executives of the Company, including Messrs. Paul, Youdelman, deVilliers and LePorte (collectively, the “Target Officers”). Pursuant to each Target Agreement, the Company will provide annual pension benefits to a Target Officer supplemental to the annual benefits paid to him under the Retirement Plan and the Restoration Plan if warranted by the formula under the Target Agreement. Generally, the target benefit is 1.733% of the Target Officer’s five-year average earnings (as defined in the Retirement Plan but without regard to IRC limitations or to deferral of income under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan), multiplied by his years of credited service, but not in excess of 30 years. The target benefit is reduced by an amount, expressed as a single life annuity, equal to the sum of the Target Officer’s Retirement Plan benefit, Restoration Plan benefit, Employee Before-Tax Savings Plan matching benefit and social security benefit. For this purpose, the Employee Before-Tax Savings Plan matching benefit assumes the Company contributed each year to the Company’s Employee Before-Tax Savings Plan for the Target Officer the maximum permissible matching contribution, and

12

Table of Contents

      Under each Target Agreement, if, after the Target Officer ceases to be a senior executive officer, (i) the Company’s bank indebtedness is accelerated, or (ii) the Company breaches any material provision of the Target Agreement and such breach continues for at least 30 days after notice to the Company, or (iii) the consolidated tangible net worth of the Company falls below $90 million (provided that such tangible net worth at the time the affected Target Officer ceases to be a senior executive officer is at least $130 million, or if such tangible net worth at the time he ceases to be a senior executive officer is less than $130 million, the tangible net worth of the Company declines by $40 million), or (iv) the Company makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or (v) any proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is instituted by or against the Company and, if instituted against the Company, is consented to or acquiesced in by it or the Company fails to use its best efforts to obtain the dismissal thereof for 60 days, or (vi) a receiver or trustee in bankruptcy is appointed for the Company, the Company will pay the affected Target Officer an amount equal to the present value of his target benefits under his Target Agreement. Similarly, under each Target Agreement, if the Target Officer’s employment is terminated within the two-year period following a “Change in Control” of the Company either by the Company other than for “Cause” or because the Target Officer is disabled or by the Target Officer for “Good Reason” (as such terms are defined below on pages 15 and 16 of this proxy statement), the Company will pay the affected Target Officer an amount equal to the present value of his target benefits under his Target Agreement. In addition, a Target Officer’s benefit under the Restoration Plan is required to be transferred to his Target Agreement in the event of a “Change in Control” of the Company. At any time after a Target Officer commences receiving benefits from his Target Agreement, the Target Officer may request that 90 percent of the present value of all remaining benefits payable to the Target Officer under his Target Agreement be paid to the Target Officer in a single lump sum cash payment. If a Target Officer elects to receive such a payment, the remaining 10 percent of such present value would be forfeited.

      The following table shows the estimated annual target benefits payable under the Target Agreements to the Target Officers, assuming normal retirement at age 65 on January 1, 2000.

(a)	For benefit calculation purposes under the Target Agreements, the current final average earnings for the Named Executive Officers are the same as those listed in footnote (a) to the Pension Benefits Table on page 12 of this proxy statement.

(b)	For benefit calculation purposes under the Target Agreements, years of credited service as of January 1, 2000 for the Named Executive Officers are the same as those listed in footnote (b) to the Pension Benefits Table on page 12 of this proxy statement.

13

Table of Contents

      The Company has adopted an Executive Benefit Plan, payments under which (if made) would offset all or a portion of the benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers under the Restoration Plan and the Target Agreements. For a description of the terms of the Executive Benefit Plan, see “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT — Employment, Termination and Change in Control Arrangements” on pages 14 to 16 of this proxy statement.

     Other Supplemental Pension Benefits Agreements

      Pursuant to an agreement entered into in 1983, and subsequently amended, with Mr. Colburn, the Company currently provides annual pension benefits to Mr. Colburn, supplemental to the annual benefits paid to him under the Retirement Plan and social security benefits, in an amount equal to $189,528, with an equivalent annual benefit payable to Mr. Colburn’s spouse for her life after his death. Pursuant to such agreement, this amount is based upon (i) his final average earnings, as defined in the Retirement Plan but during the year of highest salary and performance bonus in the four years preceding his termination date, which was December 31, 1991 when Mr. Colburn elected not to extend his employment agreement with the Company, and (ii) 36 years of service as an employee and as a director of the Company. If the consolidated tangible net worth of the Company falls below $90 million, if the Company’s bank indebtedness is accelerated or if the Company breaches any material provision of Mr. Colburn’s supplemental pension benefit agreement or post-employment consulting agreement described on pages 4 and 5 hereof and such breach continues for at least 30 days after notice to the Company, the Company will pay him or his spouse, as applicable, an amount equal to the present value of his supplemental pension benefits under his agreement. In addition, Mr. Colburn may at any time request that 90 percent of the present value of his supplemental pension benefits under his agreement be paid to him in a single lump sum cash payment. If Mr. Colburn elects to receive such a payment, the remaining 10 percent of such present value would be forfeited.

      Pursuant to an agreement entered into in 1983, as amended, with Mr. Lyons, the Company provides annual pension benefits to Mr. Lyons, supplemental to the annual benefits paid to him under the Retirement Plan, in an amount based upon (i) his final average earnings, as defined in the Retirement Plan but during the three years of highest salaries and performance bonuses in the 10 years preceding his termination date, which was September 30, 1989 (when his employment as an officer of the Company terminated), and (ii) his number of years of service as a director, prior to becoming an officer, of the Company plus his number of years of credited service under the Retirement Plan. The annual supplemental pension benefit is reduced by the amount paid to Mr. Lyons annually under the Retirement Plan. If the consolidated tangible net worth of the Company falls below $90 million, if the Company’s bank indebtedness is accelerated or if the Company breaches any material provision of Mr. Lyons’ supplemental pension benefit agreement or his post-employment consulting agreement described on page 5 hereof and such breach continues for at least 30 days after notice to the Company, the Company will pay him an amount equal to the present value of his supplemental pension benefits under his agreement. The annual benefit payable to Mr. Lyons under his supplemental pension benefit agreement, exclusive of amounts payable under the Retirement Plan and social security benefits, is $34,064, based upon his final average earnings and 20 years of service under his agreement, with an annual benefit of $17,032 payable to Mr. Lyons’ spouse for her life after his death. In addition, Mr. Lyons may at any time request that 90 percent of the present value of his supplemental pension benefits under his agreement be paid to him in a single lump sum cash payment. If Mr. Lyons elects to receive such a payment, the remaining 10 percent of such present value would be forfeited.

      The supplemental pension benefits payable to Messrs. Colburn and Lyons are funded through a so-called “rabbi trust” established by the Company.

Employment, Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements

      Robert G. Paul is employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to an employment agreement entered into in June 1991, which provides for a term of employment extending through December 31, 1993 and thereafter continuing for successive periods of 12 months each, unless either the Company or Mr. Paul gives at least three months’ notice to the contrary. No such notice was given by either party in 1999. The agreement provides for an annual salary of $300,000 commencing February 26, 1991, which amount was increased to $467,000 effective as of January 1, 2000, and is subject to such further future increases as the Board of Directors deems appropriate. The Company may terminate Mr. Paul’s employment for “Cause” (as defined in such agreement), or in the event of his disability, and he may terminate his employment for “Good

14

Table of Contents

      In the event of Mr. Paul’s disability, the Company will continue to pay him his salary and estimated bonus until the expiration of the term of his employment agreement and, thereafter, will pay him benefits equal to the maximum amount currently provided by the Company’s executive long-term disability plan, which is 60 percent of salary and estimated bonus up to a maximum of $420,000 per year, until the earlier of his normal retirement date or commencement of benefits under the Retirement Plan.

      If the Company terminates Mr. Paul’s employment other than for “Cause” or his disability, or if Mr. Paul terminates his employment for “Good Reason,” the Company will pay him an amount equal to his salary for two years, and will provide his life, disability, accident, medical and hospitalization insurance benefits for a period of two years after such termination. In addition, if termination of Mr. Paul’s employment is disputed and the dispute is ultimately resolved in his favor, the Company may be obligated to pay his salary through the date of final resolution of the dispute.

      If the Company terminates Mr. Paul’s employment other than for “Cause” or his disability, or if Mr. Paul terminates his employment for “Good Reason” following a “Change in Control” of the Company (as defined below), the Company will pay him an amount equal to 2.99 times his average annual taxable compensation from the Company during the five years preceding termination of employment, and will pay him an amount equal to the excess of the “Fair Market Value” (as defined in Mr. Paul’s employment agreement), on the date of termination, over the option price of the shares subject to each stock option held by him, whether or not exercisable at the time, in exchange for surrender of the option.

      Mr. Paul’s employment agreement provides for mandatory arbitration of all disputes relating to Mr. Paul’s employment agreement and requires the Company to pay all reasonable legal expenses incurred by Mr. Paul in connection with resolution of disputes under his employment agreement.

      The Company has severance agreements Messrs. Youdelman, LePorte and deVilliers, and three other executives, which provide severance benefits if the Company terminates the employee’s employment other than for “Cause” (as defined in such severance agreements) or disability before or after a “Change in Control” of the Company (as defined below) or if the employee terminates his employment for “Good Reason” after a “Change in Control.” “Good Reason” includes the assignment of duties inconsistent with the employee’s position with the Company, a significant adverse alteration in the nature or status of the employee’s responsibilities or the conditions of his employment, a reduction of the employee’s salary (except for across-the-board salary reductions similarly affecting all management personnel of the Company), a relocation of the employee by more than 25 miles or the failure by the Company to continue any material compensation or benefit plan. Prior to a “Change in Control,” severance payments under the agreements will be six months’ salary plus an additional month for each full year of service but in no event more than 18 months’ salary, and will be paid in normal pay periods. After a “Change in Control,” the Company will pay the employee a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of (i) one year of his base salary as in effect as of the date of termination or immediately prior to the “Change in Control,” whichever is greater, (ii) an amount equal to the highest annual incentive compensation paid to him in the three years prior to the date of termination, (iii) if the Board of Directors in its sole discretion shall determine, an additional discretionary bonus payment, and (iv) fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of the amounts set forth in clauses (i) and (ii), multiplied by the number of his completed years of full-time employment with the Company as of the date of termination, and (v) an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value (as defined in such severance agreements), on the date of termination, over the option price of the shares subject to each stock option held by him, except previously issued incentive stock options, whether or not exercisable at the time, in exchange for surrender of the option. Life, disability, accident and health insurance benefits will continue during the period of severance payments. Severance payments in excess of the base amount of six months’ salary will be reduced by any compensation received by the employee from other employment (other than self employment) prior to a “Change in Control,” and all severance payments and all insurance benefits will be discontinued if the employee engages in competition with the Company or engages in conduct which is injurious to the Company, prior to a “Change in Control.” In the event that any payment received or to be received by an employee under the aforementioned agreements, in connection with a “Change of Control” or the termination of his employment,

15

Table of Contents

      The Company has Change in Control Agreements, each dated as of September 8, 1999, with Mr. Colburn and Mr. Lyons. The Change in Control Agreements provide, respectively, that in the event of a Change in Control of the Company, Mr. Colburn will receive a payment in the amount of $1,000,000, and Mr. Lyons will receive a payment in the amount of $250,000, plus, in each case, such additional amounts as the Board of Directors may determine in its sole discretion.

      The Company also has entered into separate Supplemental Target Pension Benefit Agreements with each of Messrs. Paul, Youdelman, deVilliers and LePorte, which contain “Change in Control” provisions. For a description of the terms of these Target Agreements, see “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT — Retirement Plans — Target Benefit Agreements” on pages 12 and 13 of this proxy statement.

      In 1997, the Company adopted the Allen Telecom Inc. Executive Benefit Plan (the “Executive Benefit Plan”) under which designated employees of the Company, including Messrs. Paul, Youdelman, deVilliers and LePorte, are entitled to receive, in addition to the amounts described above, an immediate cash payment if there is a “Change in Control” of the Company (as defined below) and the following conditions are satisfied. The employee will be entitled to a cash payment only if the employee remains employed by the Company for six months after such Change in Control or terminates employment with the Company during the six-month period after the Change in Control by reason of death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination by the Company. In addition, the employee will be entitled to a cash payment if the employee’s employment terminates during the 90-day period preceding such Change in Control by reason of death, disability, retirement or involuntary termination by the Company. The amount of the cash payment to which an employee is entitled in such event is determined by the Company from time to time and allocated to an account under the Executive Benefit Plan in the name of the employee. The Company has also established a trust to hold the amounts allocated to these accounts. Any amount an employee receives from the Executive Benefit Plan offsets the amount to which the employee is entitled under the Restoration Plan and such employee’s Target Agreement (if any). Amounts allocated to the account of each Named Executive Officer under the Executive Benefit Plan to date have not exceeded the present value of benefits payable to such Named Executive Officer under the Restoration Plan and the Named Executive Officer’s Target Agreement.

      For purposes of the arrangements described above, a “Change in Control” of the Company is defined as (i) the acquisition of more than 30 percent of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company by any person or group of related persons, (ii) the change in a majority of the directors of the Company during a consecutive two-year period, unless the election of each new director was approved by at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of such period, (iii) the stockholders approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than (a) a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 80 percent of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (b) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no person acquires more than 30 percent of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, or (iv) the stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. For purposes of the Executive Benefit Plan, “Change in Control” also includes (A) the Company voluntarily filing a petition for bankruptcy under federal bankruptcy law, or an involuntary bankruptcy petition being filed against the Company under federal bankruptcy law, if such involuntary petition is not dismissed within 120 days of the filing; (B) the Company making a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or (C) the Company seeking or consenting to the appointment of a trustee, receiver, liquidator or similar person.

16

Table of Contents

Performance Graph

      Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return of the Company’s Common Stock against the cumulative total return of (i) the S&P SmallCap 600 Index and (ii) the S&P Communications Equipment Index for the period of five fiscal years ended December 31, 1999. The comparisons in this graph are required by the proxy rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not intended to forecast future performance of the Company’s Common Stock.

[GRAPH]

COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Allen Telecom Inc., S&P SmallCap 600 Index and

*

Assumes that the value of the investment of the Company’s Common Stock and each index was $100 on December 31, 1993 and that all dividends on the Company’s Common Stock and on each stock included in each index were reinvested. Included in the dividends reinvested is the spinoff distribution by the Company to its stockholders on September 29, 1995, of all of the common stock of the Company’s former wholly owned subsidiary, TransPro, Inc. (the “Spinoff Distribution”). For purposes of this graph, it is assumed that the shares of TransPro, Inc. common stock received in the Spinoff Distribution were sold at the when-issued closing market price on October 3, 1995, and the proceeds reinvested in shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the when-issued closing market price on October 3, 1995. Such date is the first day both TransPro, Inc. common stock and the Company’s Common Stock traded on a when-issued basis after the Spinoff Distribution.

17

Table of Contents

Transactions with Executive Officers and Directors

      Smith Lyons, of which firm J. Chisholm Lyons formerly was a partner and currently is counsel, has been retained by the Company for many years, including 1999 and 2000, to perform legal services for the Company and its Canadian subsidiaries.

      Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, of which firm Margaret Kennedy, the spouse of Robert G. Paul, is a partner, has been retained by the Company for several years, including 1999 and 2000, to perform legal services for the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company paid $570,000 in fees and expenses to Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff in 1999 for the performance of legal services for the Company and its subsidiaries.

Principal Stockholders

      The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 1999 with respect to the only persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners (for purposes of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission) of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock as of that date.

(a)	Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. held sole dispositive power and sole voting power over all such shares as of December 31, 1999, based on its Schedule 13G filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on February 3, 2000.

(b)	FMR Corp. held sole dispositive power over all of such shares and sole power to vote or direct the vote of 163,840 such shares as of December 31, 1999, based on its Schedule 13G filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on February  14, 2000.

(c)

Based on their Schedule 13D/A filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on November 3, 1999, Gabelli Funds, LLC held sole dispositive power and sole voting power over 955,000 of such shares, GAMCO Investors, Inc. held sole dispositive power and sole voting power over 1,386,980 of such shares; and Gabelli Advisors, Inc. held sole dispositive power and sole voting power over 15,000 of such shares.

(d)	Lazard Freres & Co. LLC held sole dispositive power over all of such shares, and sole voting power over 1,580,975 of such shares, as of December 31, 1999, based on its Schedule 13G filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on January  28, 2000.

(e)	State of Wisconsin Investment Board held sole dispositive power and sole voting power over all of such shares as of December 31, 1999, based on its Schedule 13G, as amended, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on January 25, 2000.

18

Table of Contents

Directors and Officers

      The following table sets forth information as of March 1, 2000 with respect to shares of Common Stock of the Company beneficially owned (for purposes of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission) by each director and each Named Executive Officer and by all directors and current executive officers of the Company as a group.

*  Less than 1%.

19

Table of Contents

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      During 1999 the Company completed a review of its auditing service providers and decided to consolidate its worldwide auditing with Deloitte & Touche (“Deloitte”) which has been the Company’s accountant for its principal European operations. Accordingly, on September 28, 1999, the Company entered into a letter agreement engaging Deloitte as the accountant to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements, resulting in the dismissal of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PricewaterhouseCoopers”). Deloitte replaces PricewaterhouseCoopers as the accountant of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Consequently, on September 28, 1999, the Company notified PricewaterhouseCoopers that their services were no longer required as the accountant of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. PricewaterhouseCoopers’ reports on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1998 (the two most recently completed fiscal years of the Company, which are referred to herein as the “Prior Report Periods”) contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion. No such report on the consolidated financial statements for the Prior Report Periods was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. The decision to change auditors was recommended by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and approved by the Board of Directors of the Company. During the Prior Report Periods and the subsequent interim period through September 28, 1999, preceding the replacement of PricewaterhouseCoopers, there were no disagreements with PricewaterhouseCoopers on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of PricewaterhouseCoopers would have caused them to make reference in their report on the consolidated financial statements.

      During the Prior Report Periods and the subsequent interim period Deloitte has been the auditor for the Company’s principal European operations. In that capacity Deloitte has provided advice to the Company on accounting matters regarding the European operations.

      The Board of Directors is requesting ratification of the appointment of Deloitte by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Should this appointment not be ratified by the holders of a majority of the shares voting in person or by proxy at the meeting, the Board of Directors will consider appointing other auditors to audit the books and accounts of the Company. Representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the meeting with the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

OTHER MATTERS

      Management of the Company knows of no matters other than those referred to above to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly presented to the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote such proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

MISCELLANEOUS

      The Company will bear the expense of proxy solicitation. Directors, officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries may solicit proxies by telephone, telegraph or in person (but will receive no additional compensation for such solicitation). The Company also has retained W. F. Doring & Co. Inc., Jersey City, New Jersey, to assist in the solicitation of proxies in the same manner at an anticipated fee of approximately $2,500,

20

Table of Contents

      The Charles Schwab Trust Company, as trustee under the Company’s Employee Before-Tax Savings Plan, will vote shares of the Company’s Common Stock held in the Plan in accordance with the written instructions, which it is required to request, received from the participants in whose accounts the shares are held, whether or not vested, and, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, it will vote all shares for which it does not receive voting instructions in the same proportions as it votes the shares for which it does receive instructions.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

      Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file initial reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). Such executive officers, directors and greater than ten-percent stockholders also are required by regulations promulgated by the Commission to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file with the Commission.

      To the Company’s knowledge, based solely upon a review of copies of the forms, or written representations that no such forms were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, its executive officers, directors and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements, except for one late report covering one transaction for Dr. Jill K. Conway.

ANNUAL REPORT

      The Annual Report, including financial statements, of the Company for the year 1999 is enclosed herewith but is not a part of the proxy soliciting material.

STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALS

      Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Company for inclusion in its proxy statement relating to that meeting no later than November 20, 2000. Such proposals should be directed to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s offices, 25101 Chagrin Boulevard, Beachwood, Ohio 44122.

      In accordance with recent amendments to Rule 14a-4(c)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, if a stockholder intends to present a proposal at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and does not notify the Company of such proposal on or before February 2, 2001, then management proxies will be permitted to use their discretionary voting authority to vote on the proposal if the proposal is raised at the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

	By order of the Board of Directors
	LAURA C. MEAGHER
	Secretary

21

Table of Contents

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD IN THE

ALLEN TELECOM INC.

for the Annual meeting to be held on April 28, 2000.

The undersigned hereby appoints Philip Wm. Colburn, Jill K. Conway and John F. McNiff, and each of them (with full power of substitution), as proxies of the undersigned to vote all stock of Allen Telecom Inc. which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 28, 2000 at 9:30 A.M. and at any adjournment thereof, as designated below, and in their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

1.	Election of Directors

Nominee Exception(s) 

2.	Ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche as auditors for the year ending December 31, 2000.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals 1 and 2.

[   ]  Please place an “X” in the box if you noted an address change on the reverse side.

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)

Table of Contents

Allen Telecom Inc.

Name Appears

fold and detach here

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. if no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR proposals 1 and 2.