<PAGE>
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 249.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12
FLUOR CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
LAWRENCE N. FISHER
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(j)(2).
[ ] $500 per each party to the contrary pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing:
1) Amount Previously Paid:__________________________________________________
2) Form, Schedule or Registration No.:______________________________________
3) Filing Party:____________________________________________________________
4) Date Filed:______________________________________________________________
<PAGE>
[FLUOR CORPORATION LOGO]
Fluor Corporation
3333 Michelson Drive
Irvine, California 92730
January 30, 1994
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 1994 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
which will be held on Tuesday, March 8, 1994, beginning at 9:00 a.m. at the
Hyatt Regency Irvine, 17900 Jamboree Boulevard, Irvine, California. A map
showing the meeting location is included for your convenience on the inside
back page of this booklet.
Information about the meeting and the various matters on which the
stockholders will act is included in the Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement
which follow. Also included is a Proxy Card and postage paid return envelope.
It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting. Whether or
not you plan to attend, we hope that you will complete and return your Proxy in
the enclosed envelope as promptly as possible.
Sincerely,
/s/ L.G. McCRAW
L.G. McCRAW
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
[FLUOR CORPORATION LOGO]
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MARCH 8, 1994
The annual meeting of stockholders of Fluor Corporation will be held at the
Hyatt Regency Irvine, 17900 Jamboree Boulevard, Irvine, California, on Tuesday,
March 8, 1994, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect five Class I directors to hold office for three years and
until their respective successors are elected and qualified. The Board of
Directors intends to nominate as directors the five persons identified in
the accompanying proxy statement.
2. To consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst
& Young as auditors for the fiscal year ending October 31, 1994.
3. To consider and act upon a proposal to approve certain amendments to
the 1988 Fluor Executive Stock Plan and to approve the material terms of
certain executive compensation performance goals established by the
Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board.
4. To consider and act upon a stockholder proposal concerning a senior
executive officer and director compensation ceiling.
5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed January 12, 1994 as the record date for
determining the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
meeting.
STOCKHOLDERS ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON. A MAP
SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE MEETING IS INCLUDED FOLLOWING THE PROXY STATEMENT.
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, AND DATE THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ P.J. TRIMBLE
P.J. TRIMBLE
Senior Vice President-Law and
Secretary
January 30, 1994
Irvine, California
<PAGE>
[FLUOR CORPORATION LOGO]
PROXY STATEMENT
JANUARY 30, 1994
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the
Board of Directors of Fluor Corporation, 3333 Michelson Drive, Irvine,
California 92730 (the "Company" or "Fluor"), of your proxy for use at the
annual meeting of stockholders to be held March 8, 1994 or at any adjournment
thereof. This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are being mailed
to all stockholders on or about January 30, 1994. The expense of the
solicitation will be paid by the Company. Some officers and regular employees
may solicit proxies personally and by telephone. Georgeson & Co. Inc. has been
engaged to assist in the solicitation for which it will receive approximately
$14,000 from the Company. Your proxy is revocable by written notice to the
Secretary of the Company at any time prior to exercise, and it shall be
suspended if you are present at the meeting and elect to vote in person.
On January 12, 1994, the record date fixed by the Board of Directors, the
Company had outstanding 82,104,868 shares of Common Stock. A majority of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock will constitute a quorum at the Annual
Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of
determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of
business. Abstentions are counted in tabulations of the votes cast on proposals
presented to stockholders, whereas broker non-votes are not counted for
purposes of determining whether a proposal has been approved. Stockholders have
one vote for each share on all business of the meeting, except that
stockholders have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election at the
meeting of five directors. Cumulative voting rights entitle a stockholder to
give one nominee as many votes as is equal to the number of directors to be
elected multiplied by the number of shares owned by him, or to distribute his
votes on the same principle among two or more nominees as he sees fit. The five
nominees for director receiving the highest number of votes at the meeting will
be elected. With respect to the other proposals, the affirmative vote of the
majority of shares represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and
entitled to vote is required for approval.
Unless otherwise directed in the accompanying proxy, the persons named
therein will vote FOR the election of the five director nominees listed below,
FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young as auditors for the
fiscal year ending October 31, 1994, FOR the proposal to approve certain
amendments to the 1988 Fluor Executive Stock Plan and the proposed executive
compensation performance goals, and AGAINST the proposal concerning a senior
executive officer and director compensation ceiling. As to any other business
which may properly come before the meeting, they will vote in accordance with
their best judgment, although the Company does not presently know of any other
business.
<PAGE>
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 1
Under the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, which provide
for a "classified" Board, five directors have been nominated for election at
the annual meeting to serve a three year term expiring at the annual meeting in
1997 and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. The
Bylaws presently provide for fourteen directors, five each serving as Class I
and Class II directors and four serving as Class III directors.
Each of the five nominees listed below presently serves as a Class I director
of the Company. If any of the nominees should decline or be unable to act as a
director, the persons named in the proxy will vote in accordance with their
best judgment. The Company knows of no reason why the nominees would not be
available for election or, if elected, would not be able to serve.
In the event anyone other than the five nominees listed below should be
nominated for election as a director, the persons named in the proxy may vote
cumulatively for less than all the nominees.
BIOGRAPHICAL
The following biographical information is furnished with respect to each of
the five nominees for election at the annual meeting as Class I director and
each of the other Class II and Class III directors whose terms will continue
after the annual meeting.
Class I Director Nominees(/1/):
DAVID P. GARDNER, age 60.
Director since 1988; member of Nominating and Organization and
Compensation Committees.
President of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation since
January 1, 1993; formerly President of the University of
California from 1983; and President Emeritus of the
University of Utah since 1983.
Dr. Gardner also is a director of the John Alden Financial
Corporation, Miami, Florida; and the First Security
Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah.
GERALD M. GLENN, age 51.
Director since 1989; member of Executive Committee.
Group President of Fluor Daniel, Inc.(2) since 1986; joined
the Company in 1964.
2
<PAGE>
WILLIAM R. GRANT, age 69.
Director since 1982; Chairman of Organization and
Compensation Committee; member of Audit Committee.
Chairman of the Board of Galen Associates, Inc., New York,
New York, since 1989; formerly Chairman of the Board of New
York Life International Investment Inc. from 1987.
Mr. Grant also is a director of Allergan, Inc., Irvine,
California; New York Life Insurance Company, New York, New
York; Seagull Energy Corporation, Houston, Texas;
SmithKline Beecham PLC, London, England; and Witco
Corporation, New York, New York.
VINCENT L. KONTNY, age 56.
Director since 1988; member of Executive Committee.
Chief Operating Officer since 1991; President since 1990;
President of Fluor Daniel, Inc.(2) since 1988; joined the
Company in 1965.
VILMA S. MARTINEZ, age 50.
Director since 1993; member of Audit and Nominating
Committees.
Partner in Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, California
since 1982.
Ms. Martinez also is a director of Anheuser-Busch Companies,
Inc., St. Louis, Missouri and Sanwa Bank California, Los
Angeles, California.
Class II Directors--Term Expires 1995(1):
HUGH K. COBLE, age 59.
Director since 1984; member of Executive Committee.
Group President of Fluor Daniel, Inc.(2) since 1986; joined the Company in
1966.
ROBERT V. LINDSAY, age 68.
Director since 1982; Chairman of Audit Committee and member of Organization and
Compensation Committee.
Retired President of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, a bank holding company,
and its wholly owned subsidiary, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York,
New York. Mr. Lindsay also is a director of The Chubb Corporation, New York,
New York; Fishkill National Corp., La Grange, New York; Lomas Financial Corp.,
Dallas, Texas; J.P. Morgan (Suisse) S.A., Geneva, Switzerland; Russell
Reynolds Associates, New York, New York; and United Meridian Corp., Dallas,
Texas.
3
<PAGE>
E. MORGAN MASSEY, age 67.(4)
Director since 1987.
Chairman Emeritus of A. T. Massey Coal Company, Inc.(3) since 1991; formerly
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of that subsidiary from 1990
and President of that subsidiary from 1972; joined A. T. Massey Coal Company
in 1947.
Mr. Massey also is a director of Owens and Minor, Inc., Richmond, Virginia.
LESLIE G. McCRAW, age 59.
Director since 1984; Chairman of Executive Committee and member of Nominating
Committee.
Chairman of the Board since 1991; Chief Executive Officer since 1990; formerly
Vice Chairman of the Board from 1990; formerly President from 1988; joined the
Company in 1975.
Mr. McCraw also is a director of Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California; and
Multimedia, Inc., Greenville, South Carolina.
MARTHA R. SEGER, age 61.
Director since 1991; member of Audit and Nominating Committees.
Distinguished Visiting Professor of Finance, American Graduate School of
International Management, Tucson, Arizona; formerly John M. Olin Distinguished
Fellow, University of Arizona from 1991; formerly Member, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System from 1984.
Dr. Seger also is a director of Amoco, Chicago, Illinois; Capital Holding,
Louisville, Kentucky; Johnson Controls, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Kroger Company,
Cincinnati, Ohio; Tucson Electric Power, Tucson, Arizona; and Xerox
Corporation, Stamford, Connecticut.
Class III Directors Term Expires 1996(1):
PETER J. FLUOR, age 46.
Director since 1984; member of Audit and Organization and Compensation
Committees.
President and CEO of Texas Crude, Inc. and Texas Crude Energy, Inc., Houston,
Texas since 1981.
Mr. Fluor also is a director of Seagull Energy Corporation, Houston, Texas; and
Texas Commerce Bank, Inc., Houston, Texas.
4
<PAGE>
BOBBY R. INMAN, age 62.
Director since 1985; Chairman of Nominating Committee and member of
Organization and Compensation Committee.
Admiral, U.S. Navy (Retired).
Admiral Inman also is a director of Science Applications International
Corporation, La Jolla, California; Southwestern Bell Corporation, San Antonio,
Texas; Temple-Inland Inc., Diboll, Texas; and Xerox Corporation, Stamford,
Connecticut.
BUCK MICKEL, age 68.
Director since 1977.
Retired 1987 as Vice Chairman of the Board; formerly President from 1984.
Mr. Mickel also is a director of Delta Woodside Industries, Greenville, South
Carolina; Duke Power Company, Charlotte, North Carolina; Emergent Group, Inc.,
Greenville, South Carolina; Insignia Financial Corporation, Greenville, South
Carolina; Liberty Corporation, Greenville, South Carolina; Monsanto Company,
St. Louis, Missouri; NationsBank Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia; and RSI
Holdings, Inc., Greenville, South Carolina.
DAVID S. TAPPAN, JR., age 71.(4)
Director since 1965.
Retired 1990 as Chairman of the Board; formerly Chief Executive Officer from
1984.
Mr. Tappan also is a director of Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc., La Jolla,
California; Allianz Insurance Co., Munich, Germany; Beckman Instruments, Inc.,
Fullerton, California; and Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
- --------
(1) Except as otherwise indicated, all positions are with the Company.
(2) Fluor Daniel, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company which
provides design, engineering, procurement, construction management,
maintenance and technical services to a wide range of industrial,
commercial, utility, natural resources, energy and governmental clients.
(3) A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc. ("A.T. Massey") is a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company, which along with its subsidiaries, produces and sells low
sulfur coal.
(4) Pursuant to the retirement provisions of the Company's Bylaws , Mr. Massey
is scheduled to retire as a director in March, 1994, and Mr. Tappan is
scheduled to retire as a director at the end of calendar year 1994.
5
<PAGE>
STOCK OWNERSHIP
The following information is furnished with respect to each of the five
director nominees, each of the other nine current directors and Named
Executive Officers and all current directors and executive officers of the
Company as a group as to ownership of shares of Common Stock of the Company as
of January 15, 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSISTING IN PART OF SHARES
UNDER/WITH
--------------------------------
VOTING AND
SHARES EXCERCISABLE INVESTMENT POWER
BENEFICIALLY STOCK -------------------
OWNED(1)(2) OPTIONS SOLE SHARED
------------ ------------ --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Class I Director Nominees:
David P. Gardner.................. 600 600
Gerald M. Glenn(3)................ 53,895 26,174 27,721
William R. Grant.................. 480 480
Vincent L. Kontny(3).............. 108,518 55,490 53,028
Vilma S. Martinez................. 100 100
Class II Directors:
Hugh K. Coble(3).................. 65,524 27,174 38,350
Robert V. Lindsay................. 1,000 1,000
E. Morgan Massey.................. 168,641 39,548 125,300 3,793
Leslie G. McCraw(3)............... 170,262 76,432 93,830
Martha R. Seger................... 100 100
Class III Directors:
Peter J. Fluor.................... 18,483 18,483
Bobby R. Inman.................... 1,000 1,000
Buck Mickel....................... 5,000 5,000
David S. Tappan Jr................ 137,080 137,080
Other Named Executive Officers:
Donald L. Blankenship............. 13,185 2,705 10,480
All directors and executive
officers (21) including the above. 841,106 261,389 574,094 5,623
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Each individual owns less than .3% and the group owns approximately 1.0%
of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company.
(2) In addition to the foregoing beneficial ownership amounts, the Directors
listed below have elected the Common Stock valuation method for valuing
all or a portion of their deferred directors' fees (see section entitled
"Directors' Fees" at page 16 hereof) and, as of January 15, 1994, such
amounts constitute the economic equivalent of the following numbers of
shares of Common Stock:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ECONOMIC EQUIVALENT
NUMBER OF SHARES
-------------------
<S> <C>
Peter J. Fluor........................................ 9,960
William R. Grant...................................... 15,388
Robert V. Lindsay..................................... 10,262
Vilma S. Martinez..................................... 460
</TABLE>
(3) This individual is also a Named Executive Officer as defined in the
section entitled "Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation" on page
11 below.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The standing committees of the Board consist of an Executive Committee, an
Audit Committee, an Organization and Compensation Committee and a Nominating
Committee.
When the Board is not in session, the Executive Committee has all of the
power and authority of the Board except with respect to amending the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation; adopting an agreement of
6
<PAGE>
merger or consolidation; recommending to the stockholders the sale, lease or
exchange of all or substantially all of the Company's property and assets;
recommending to the stockholders a dissolution of the Company or a revocation
of the dissolution; amending the Bylaws; the declaration of a dividend; or the
issuance of stock. The members of the Executive Committee are Leslie G. McCraw
(Chairman), Hugh K. Coble, Gerald M. Glenn and Vincent L. Kontny. The
Executive Committee held eleven meetings and acted by unanimous written
consent on one occasion during fiscal year 1993.
The principal duties of the Audit Committee are to nominate the firm of
independent auditors for appointment by the Board; to meet with the
independent auditors to review and approve the scope of their audit engagement
and the fees related to such work; to meet with the Company's financial
management, internal audit management and independent auditors to review
matters relating to internal accounting controls, the internal audit program,
the Company's accounting practices and procedures and other matters relating
to the financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries; and to report
to the Board periodically any conclusions or recommendations the Audit
Committee may have with respect to such matters. The members of the Audit
Committee are Robert V. Lindsay (Chairman), Peter J. Fluor, William R. Grant,
Vilma S. Martinez and Martha R. Seger, none of whom is a current or former
officer or employee of the Company or any subsidiary. The Audit Committee held
five meetings during fiscal year 1993, four regular meetings and a special
meeting to review and approve the Company's 1992 Annual Report, 10-K and proxy
materials. At the end of each of the regular meetings, the members met
privately with the Company's independent auditors without any Company officers
or other personnel present.
The principal duties of the Organization and Compensation Committee are to
review corporate organizational structures; to review key employee
compensation policies, plans and programs; to monitor performance and
compensation of employee-directors and officers of the Company and other key
employees; to prepare recommendations and periodic reports to the Board
concerning such matters; and to function as the Committee which administers
the long-term incentive programs referred to in the Compensation section
hereof. The members of the Organization and Compensation Committee are William
R. Grant (Chairman), Peter J. Fluor, David P. Gardner, Bobby R. Inman and
Robert V. Lindsay, none of whom is a current or former officer or employee of
the Company or any subsidiary. The Organization and Compensation Committee
held four meetings, and took action by unanimous written consent on one
occasion during fiscal year 1993.
The function of the Nominating Committee is to seek out, evaluate and
recommend to the Board qualified nominees for election as directors of the
Company, and to consider other matters pertaining to the size and composition
of the Board. The members of the Nominating Committee are Bobby R. Inman
(Chairman), David P. Gardner, Vilma S. Martinez, Leslie G. McCraw and Martha
R. Seger. During fiscal year 1993, the Nominating Committee held four
meetings. The Nominating Committee will give appropriate consideration to
qualified persons recommended by stockholders for nomination as directors of
the Company provided that such recommendations are accompanied by information
sufficient to enable the Nominating Committee to evaluate the qualifications
of the nominee.
The Company's Bylaws also require that the Secretary must receive written
notice of all persons to be nominated as a director at an annual meeting,
other than nominations made at the direction of the Board of Directors, not
less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the annual meeting at which the
election will take place (or not later than 10 days after public disclosure of
such meeting if such disclosure occurs less than 40 days prior to the date of
such meeting). The notice must set forth (a) the stockholder's name and
address, and the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such
stockholder, (b) such information with respect to the nominee as would have to
be included in the Proxy Statement if such person were a nominee included in
that Statement and (c) a consent to serve as director signed by such nominee.
BOARD AND COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE
During fiscal year 1993, the Board held four regular meetings, one of which
was followed by an extensive strategic planning session, and took action by
unanimous written consent on two occasions. Each of the
7
<PAGE>
directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the
Board and of the Board Committees on which they served.
OTHER MATTERS
In fiscal year 1992 the Company made an interest free loan in the amount of
$300,000 to Donald L. Blankenship, a Named Executive Officer of the Company, to
be used to defray expenses associated with Mr. Blankenship's relocation to the
Richmond, Virginia headquarters of A.T. Massey. The loan was repaid in full
after the end of fiscal year 1993.
In fiscal year 1993, A.T. Massey agreed to sell the stock of its subsidiary,
Massey Coal International, Inc., to a company controlled by E. Morgan Massey
for $1.4 million. Massey Coal International had engaged in certain exploration
efforts in connection with a possible Venezuelan mining joint venture. The
exploration efforts have not yet resulted in any firm mining agreement. The
purchase price to be paid for Massey Coal International is contingent upon
actual mining development and would compensate A.T. Massey for the cost of its
investment in the venture.
ORGANIZATION AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As members of the Organization and Compensation Committee it is our duty to
administer the Company's executive incentive plans, to review compensation
plans, programs and policies, to monitor the performance and compensation of
executive officers and other key employees and to make appropriate
recommendations and reports to the Board concerning matters of executive
compensation.
The Company maintains compensation programs designed to attract, motivate and
retain management, with incentives linked to financial performance and enhanced
shareholder value. The fundamental philosophy is to relate the amount of
compensation "at risk" for an executive directly to his or her contribution to
the Company's success in achieving superior performance objectives. The
Company's executive compensation program consists of three main components: 1)
base salary; 2) potential for an annual bonus based on overall Company
performance as well as individual performance and 3) the opportunity to earn
long-term cash and stock-based incentives which are intended to encourage the
achievement of superior results over time and to align executive officer and
shareholder interests. The second and third elements constitute the "at-risk"
portion of the compensation program. For fiscal year 1993 the percentage of
total compensation earned by the Named Executive Officers which was of the "at
risk" type was approximately 78%. The nature of the long-term programs as well
as the extended vesting period for stock options mean that executives may
realize their incentive awards at a substantially later time than when the
shareholders benefit from stock price appreciation. To further align
management's interests with those of the shareholders, the Company, on the
recommendation of this committee, adopted stock ownership targets for its
officers during fiscal year 1993. These voluntary targets are intended to
encourage stock ownership by the company's management group. In the case of the
CEO the targeted stock ownership guideline is 500% of base salary.
The philosophy for establishing specific compensation levels for executive
officers and other key employees is both to link total compensation to
achievement of the Company's business goals and to measure total compensation
against that of a broad group of general industry companies of similar size.(1)
For this purpose, this Committee uses the compensation surveys of two of the
major compensation consulting firms, Hewitt and Associates and Towers Perrin as
reference points. The general policy of the Committee is to position executive
base salaries, including that of the CEO, at approximately the 50th percentile
of the general industry group, with salary plus bonus at the 50th to 60th
percentile, and total compensation up to the 75th percentile based upon stock
price appreciation and achievement of earnings above target levels.
- --------
(1) This group covers a broad range of industries, and is not limited to
companies in the Dow Jones Heavy Construction Group that is used for the
Performance Graph set forth on page 15 hereof.
8
<PAGE>
Under the Company's bonus plan, a minimum rate of return on average
stockholders' equity must be achieved before bonuses can be paid and further
limits are placed on the maximum amount of earnings that can be paid out as
bonuses. Bonuses may not be paid unless net earnings, excluding extraordinary,
unusual or infrequently occurring items, exceed 6% of stockholders' equity.
Further, the total amount of bonuses paid may not exceed either (a) 20% of pre-
tax earnings (excluding extraordinary, unusual or infrequently occurring items
and the award fund itself) or (b) 10% of average stockholders' equity. The plan
covers approximately 675 management employees, including all the Named
Executive Officers other than Mr. Blankenship(1). The target amounts payable
out of the fund to each executive is based on the executive's bonus grade, with
the actual amount paid based upon a combination of various company performance
criteria, and upon individual performance, with an equal weighting for each
category. The bonus award of the CEO is determined by this Committee and the
bonus award of each other executive officer is reviewed and approved by this
Committee. For fiscal year 1993, bonus awards to the Named Executive Officers
as a group placed salary plus bonus in the upper end of the 50th to 60th
percentile range based upon our appraisal of their and the company's
performance. The salary level and bonus award for Mr. McCraw was determined by
reference to the target levels for the general industry group discussed above,
and were at the upper end of the target percentiles on the basis of achievement
of superior operating results by both Fluor Daniel and Massey and on our
subjective evaluation of his achievement of objectives in the following key
results areas: strategic planning, overall leadership, quality of external
relations, internal teamwork, ethics and management succession.
All of the executive officers participate in the Company's long-term
incentive program. This program's primary purpose is to offer an incentive for
the achievement of superior performance over time, to align executive officer
and stockholder interests, and to foster the retention of key management
personnel. It is the Committee's intent that all amounts to be awarded under
this program qualify as performance-based compensation excluded from the new
federal tax limitations on the deductibility of executive compensation.
Consistent with this intent, the program already requires that options be
granted at no less than market value and prohibits the cancellation and
subsequent regrant of stock options and SARs.
Under the long-term incentive program, the Committee each year may make
grants of the following: (a) cash incentive awards which are based upon meeting
three-year earnings targets established by the Committee; (b) stock options
which become exercisable over a four year period and which have value only if
shareholder value is increased and (c) restricted stock which may be hereafter
awarded only if return on equity targets are achieved. The weighting of awards
between the earnings-based cash portion and the stock portion is primarily a
function of responsibility with the more senior executives having a greater
portion of their awards dependent on stock performance. The 1993 awards to Mr.
McCraw and other executive officers were based on placing each of their total
compensation levels in the mid-range of the general industry group if target
performance was achieved. To achieve higher than mid-range compensation (i.e.,
up to the 75th percentile range) would require performance in excess of the
established targets. Also for 1993, participating executive officers received a
payout of a previously granted cash incentive award which was based upon
achieving 103% of the target amount for fiscal 1991 through 1993 earnings
performance.
- --------
(1) Mr. Blankenship participates in the A.T. Massey Bonus Plan which covers
management employees of A.T. Massey and provides annual bonus awards based
on individual and company performance. Mr. Blankenship's awards under the
A.T. Massey Bonus Plan are reviewed and approved by this Committee. Mr.
Blankenship also participates in the A.T. Massey Retention Plan. Under this
plan, units having a value of $100 each are awarded to key management
employees from time to time. The units vest at the rate of 10% per year for
each year of continuous employment and are payable upon retirement. The
A.T. Massey Board may also pay "dividends" on the units. As with the Bonus
Plan, all amounts awarded to Mr. Blankenship under the Retention Plan are
subject to the review and approval of the Committee.
9
<PAGE>
At the recommendation of this Committee, certain conforming amendments to the
1988 Fluor Executive Stock Plan and the performance goals under the cash
portion of the long-term incentive program and the restricted units related to
restricted stock awards are being presented for stockholder approval.
Shareholder approval of these goals and amendments will conform them to the new
IRS definitions of performance pay and should help to assure full deductibility
of future awards. For full conformity, this Committee must later verify that
the pre-established performance goals have actually been attained. Furthermore,
this Committee will continue to monitor future developments in this area, and
to bring forth any further changes required to keep the company's programs in
conformity with these guidelines.
All amounts paid or accrued during fiscal year 1993 under the above described
plans and programs are included in the tables which follow. No member of this
Committee is a former or current officer or employee of the Company or any of
its subsidiaries.
ORGANIZATION AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
William R. Grant David P. Gardner Robert V. Lindsay
Peter J. Fluor Bobby R. Inman
</TABLE>
January 30, 1994
10
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION
The following table shows, for the fiscal years ended October 31, 1991, 1992
and 1993, the cash compensation paid by the Company and its subsidiaries, as
well as certain other compensation paid or accrued for those years, to each of
the five most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (the "Named
Executive Officers") in all capacities in which they served.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG TERM COMPENSATION
--------------------------------- ------------------------------
AWARDS PAYOUTS
--------------------- --------
OTHER RESTRICTED SECURITIES
ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL SALARY ($) BONUS ($) COMPENSATION AWARDS(S) OPTIONS/ PAYOUTS COMPENSATION
POSITION YEAR (A) (A) ($)(B) ($)(C) SARS(#) ($) ($)(D)
------------------ ------ ---------- --------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
L. G. McCraw--Chairman FY1993 $680,040 $610,000 $63,431 $492,963 57,940 $185,604 $142,416
and Chief Executive FY1992 $647,323 $525,000 $39,631 $575,802 37,630 $189,328 $121,894
Officer FY1991 $591,162 $470,000 $19,146 $601,546 37,630 $435,300 $115,611
V. L. Kontny--President FY1993 $475,080 $375,000 $46,199 $323,698 38,020 $144,684 $110,651
and Chief Operating FY1992 $452,169 $340,000 $29,608 $399,664 26,060 $142,000 $150,954
Officer FY1991 $397,553 $300,000 $15,466 $417,533 26,060 $297,900 $ 88,052
H. K. Coble--Group FY1993 $377,580 $290,000 $30,887 $211,145 24,810 $100,943 $237,373
President, Fluor FY1992 $359,573 $265,000 $19,795 $267,142 17,450 $ 94,672 $ 89,783
Daniel, Inc. FY1991 $314,066 $230,000 $10,340 $279,086 17,450 $187,100 $ 83,459
G. M. Glenn--Group FY1993 $377,580 $290,000 $30,887 $211,145 24,810 $100,943 $ 91,641
President, Fluor FY1992 $359,573 $265,000 $19,795 $267,142 17,450 $ 94,672 $ 96,957
Daniel, Inc. FY1991 $307,514 $230,000 $10,340 $279,086 17,450 $151,400 $148,105
D. L. Blankenship-- FY1993 $275,032 $230,000 $13,310 $ 74,599 8,770 $ 0 $ 94,646
Chairman and FY1992 $237,216 $200,000 $ 6,844 $150,136 4,340 $ 0 $ 68,552
Chief Executive FY1991 $187,000 $100,000 $ 0 $254,137 3,240 $ 0 $ 65,589
Officer, A. T.
Massey Coal Company,
Inc.
</TABLE>
- --------
(A) Amounts shown include cash compensation earned and received by executive
officers as well as amounts earned but deferred at the election of those
officers.
(B) Amounts shown as Other Annual Compensation represent restricted unit
payments for the benefit of each Named Executive Officer to compensate for
federal and state withholding taxes arising from the lapse of restrictions
on restricted stock held by such Named Executive Officer.
(C) The amount reported in the table represents the market value at the date
of grant, without giving effect to the diminution in value attributable to
the restrictions on such stock. In fiscal years 1991, 1992, and 1993, the
Company awarded 41,190, 39,580 and 30,110 shares of restricted stock to
all Named Executive Officers as a group with vesting at the rate of 10%
per year starting one year after the date of grant. As of the end of the
1993 fiscal year, the restricted stock holdings for the above consisted of
the following: (i) Mr. McCraw; 54,180 shares with a value of
$2,207,835.00; (ii) Mr. Kontny; 40,922 shares with a value of
$1,667,571.15; (iii) Mr. Coble; 34,528 shares with a value of
$1,407,016.00; (iv) Mr. Glenn: 23,878 shares with a value of $973,028.50;
(v) Mr. Blankenship: 9,084 shares with a value of $370,173.00; and the
aggregate restricted stock holdings for the Company consisted of 531,573
shares with the value of $21,661,599.00 at the then current market value,
without giving effect to the diminution of value attributable to the
restrictions on such stock. Quarterly dividends of $.13 per share are
currently paid to all shareholders of record.
(D) The total amounts shown in this column for the last fiscal year consist of
the following: (i) Mr. McCraw: $93,581--Company contributions and other
allocations to defined contribution plans and related excess benefit
plans; $562--Miscellaneous; $48,273--Benefit attributable to Company owned
life insurance policy; (ii) Mr. Kontny: $67,154--Company contributions and
other allocations to defined contribution plans and related excess benefit
plans; $43,497--Benefit attributable to Company owned life insurance
policy, (iii) Mr. Coble: $136,147--Cash out of accrued time off; $52,953--
Company contributions and other allocations to defined contribution plans
and related excess benefit plans; $48,273--Benefit attributable to Company
owned life insurance policy; (iv) Mr. Glenn: $54,762--Company
contributions and other allocations to defined contribution plans and
related excess benefit plans; $36,879--Benefit attributable to Company
owned life insurance policy; (v) Mr. Blankenship: $6,414--Benefit
attributable to Company owned life insurance policy; $7,965--Miscellaneous
relocation expenses; $80,267--Amounts earned pursuant to A. T. Massey
Retention plan.
11
<PAGE>
STOCK OPTIONS
The following table contains information concerning the grant of stock
options made during fiscal year 1993 under the Company's long-term incentive
program to the Named Executive Officers:
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR (A)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
----------------------------------------
% OF
TOTAL
NUMBER OF OPTIONS
SECURITIES GRANTED GRANT
UNDERLYING TO EXERCISE DATE
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES PRICE PRESENT
GRANTED IN FISCAL ($/SH) EXPIRATION VALUE
NAME (B) (C) YEAR (D) DATE ($) (E)
---- ---------- --------- -------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
L.G. McCraw............. 57,940 9.7% $43.5625 09/13/2003 $736,997
V.L. Kontny............. 38,020 6.3% $43.5625 09/13/2003 $483,614
H.K. Coble.............. 24,810 4.1% $43.5625 09/13/2003 $315,583
G.M. Glenn.............. 24,810 4.1% $43.5625 09/13/2003 $315,583
D.L. Blankenship........ 8,770 1.5% $43.5625 09/13/2003 $111,554
</TABLE>
- --------
(A) As a matter of policy, no SARs were granted to any of the Named Executive
Officers.
(B) Options granted in fiscal year 1993 are exercisable starting 12 months
after the grant date, with 25% of the shares covered thereby becoming
exercisable at that time and with an additional 25% of the option shares
becoming exercisable on each successive anniversary date, with full vesting
occurring on the fourth anniversary date.
(C) The options were granted for a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
termination in certain events related to termination of employment.
(D) The exercise price and tax withholding obligations related to exercise may
be paid by delivery of already owned shares or by offset of the underlying
shares, subject to certain conditions.
(E) Present values were calculated using the Black-Scholes options pricing
model which has been adjusted to take dividends into account. Use of this
model should not be viewed in any way as a forecast of the future
performance of the Company's stock. The estimated present value of each
stock option is $12.72 based on the following inputs:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Stock Price (Fair Market Value) at Grant (09/13/93) $43.5625
Exercise Price $43.5625
Expected Option Term 6 Years
Risk-Free Interest Rate 5.03%
Stock Price Volatility 22.44%
Dividend Yield 1.10%
</TABLE>
The model assumes: (a) an Expected Option Term of 6 years which reflects the
actual 10 year life of the option discounted for factors such as the expected
time until exercise and the risk of forfeiture; (b) a Risk- Free Interest Rate
that represents the interest rate on a U.S. Treasury Note with a maturity date
corresponding to that of the Expected Option Term; (c) Stock Price Volatility
is calculated using daily stock prices over a one year period from September
13, 1992 to September 13, 1993; and (d) Dividend Yield is calculated using the
annual dividend rate in effect at date of grant ($.48 per share).
Notwithstanding the fact that these options are non-transferable, no discount
for lack of marketability was taken.
12
<PAGE>
OPTION/SAR EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Named
Executive Officers, concerning the exercise of options during the last fiscal
year and unexercised options and SARs held as of the end of the fiscal year:
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION/SAR VALUE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
SHARES OPTIONS/SARS AT OPTIONS/SARS AT
ACQUIRED ON VALUE FISCAL YEAR END (#) FISCAL YEAR END ($)(C)
EXERCISE REALIZED ------------------------- -------------------------
NAME (#)(A) ($)(B) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- ----------- ---------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
L.G. McCraw............. 100,000 $2,750,000 81,465 113,048 $702,788 $35,306
V.L. Kontny............. 50,000 $1,375,000 55,490 77,110 $428,884 $28,503
H.K. Coble.............. 70,000 $1,952,188 37,174 50,986 $287,568 $19,088
G.M. Glenn.............. 14,159 $ 389,373 35,170 50,986 $237,962 19,088
D.L. Blankenship........ 0 $ 0 2,705 13,645 $ 0 $ 0
</TABLE>
- --------
(A) No SARs were exercised by any of the Named Executive Officers during fiscal
year 1993.
(B) Market value of underlying securities on date of exercise, minus the grant
price.
(C) Market value of underlying securities at year-end, minus the grant price.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS
The following table provides information concerning cash-incentive awards
made during fiscal year 1993 under the Company's long-term incentive program.
Each award represents the right to receive an amount in cash if, and only if,
consolidated earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT") of the Company's
principal operating subsidiary, Fluor Daniel, Inc. for the three year period
ending October 31, 1996 achieves certain levels which have been set by the
Organization and Compensation Committee. If EBIT falls between the threshold
amount and the target amount or between the target amount and the maximum
amount then the amount of the award is prorated accordingly. If EBIT is above
the maximum amount, no additional award is payable. Payments made under the
long-term incentive program are reported in the Summary Compensation Table in
the year of payout.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM-AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER NON-STOCK PRICE BASED
PERFORMANCE OR PLANS
OTHER PERIOD ---------------------------
UNTIL MATURATION MIDDLE
NAME OR PAYOUT THRESHOLD TARGET MAXIMUM
---- ---------------- --------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
L.G. McCraw..................... 3 years $60,000 $240,000 $480,000
V.L. Kontny..................... 3 years $39,400 $157,500 $315,000
H.K. Coble...................... 3 years $25,700 $102,800 $205,500
G.M. Glenn...................... 3 years $25,700 $102,800 $205,500
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
PENSION PLANS
PENSION PLAN TABLE
YEARS OF SERVICE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
REMUNERATION 10 15 20 25 30 35 OR MORE
------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$125,000 $18,750 $ 28,125 $ 37,500 $ 46,875 $ 56,250 $ 65,625
$150,000 $22,500 $ 33,750 $ 45,000 $ 56,250 $ 67,500 $ 78,750
$175,000 $26,250 $ 39,375 $ 52,500 $ 65,625 $ 78,750 $ 91,875
$200,000 $30,000 $ 45,000 $ 60,000 $ 75,000 $ 90,000 $105,000
$225,000 $33,750 $ 50,625 $ 67,500 $ 84,375 $101,250 $118,125
$250,000 $37,500 $ 56,250 $ 75,000 $ 93,750 $112,500 $131,250
$300,000 $45,000 $ 67,500 $ 90,000 $112,500 $135,000 $157,500
$400,000 $60,000 $ 90,000 $120,000 $150,000 $180,000 $210,000
$450,000 $67,500 $101,250 $135,000 $168,750 $202,500 $236,250
$500,000 $75,000 $112,500 $150,000 $187,500 $225,000 $262,500
</TABLE>
The foregoing table shows the estimated annual pension benefits payable to a
covered participant at normal retirement age under the A.T. Massey Coal
Company, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan, (the "A.T. Massey Pension Plan"),
as well as a non-qualified supplemental pension that provides benefits that
would otherwise be denied participants by reason of certain Internal Revenue
Code limitations on qualified plan benefits, based on remuneration that is
covered under the plans and years of service with A.T. Massey and its
subsidiaries. Donald L. Blankenship is the only Named Executive Officer
participating in the A.T. Massey Pension Plan.
A participant's remuneration covered by the A.T. Massey Pension Plan is their
average base salary and bonus (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table)
for the five of the last ten calendar plan years of the participant's career
for which such average is the highest or, in the case of a participant who has
been employed for less than five full calendar years, the period of their
employment with A.T. Massey and its subsidiaries. As of the end of the last
calendar year Mr. Blankenship's covered compensation under the A.T. Massey
Pension Plan was $235,840 and he has been credited with ten years of service.
Benefits shown are computed as a straight line annuity beginning at age 65 with
no deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts.
14
<PAGE>
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among Fluor Corporation,
S&P 500 and DJ Heavy Construction Group
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH APPEARS HERE]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Measurement Period Fluor S&P 500
Fiscal Year Covered Corporation Index Peer Group
- ------------------- ----------- ------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Measurement Pt-12/31/1988 $100 $100 $100
FYE 12/31/1989 $147.25 $126.40 $127.33
FYE 12/31/1990 $166.83 $116.95 $122.93
FYE 12/31/1991 $236.86 $156.12 $162.85
FYE 12/31/1992 $233.91 $171.66 $170.83
FYE 12/31/1993 $216.07 $197.31 $173.21
</TABLE>
(1) The above graph compares the performance of Fluor Corporation with that of
the S&P 500 Composite Index and the Dow Jones Heavy Construction Industry
Group Index, which is a published industry index.
(2) The comparison of total return on investment (change in year end stock
price plus reinvested dividends) for each of the periods assumes that $100
was invested on October 31, 1988 in each of Fluor Corporation, the S&P 500
Composite Group and the Dow Jones Heavy Construction Industry Group with
investment weighted on the basis of market capitalization.
15
<PAGE>
CHANGE OF CONTROL PROVISIONS IN CERTAIN PLANS
Under the Company's "Stock Plans," which provide for stock options,
restricted stock and SARs, restrictions on exercisability and transferability
which are premised on continued service with the Company or its subsidiaries
lapse if the holder's employment is terminated for any reason within two years
following a change of control of the Company. A change of control of the
Company shall be deemed to have occurred if (1) a third person, including a
"group," as defined in Section 13 (d) (3) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, acquires shares of the Company having twenty-five percent or more of the
total number of votes that may be cast for the election of directors of the
Company or (2) as a result of any cash tender or exchange offer, merger or
other business combination, or any combination of the foregoing transactions (a
"Transaction"), the persons who were directors of the Company before the
Transaction shall cease to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors of
the Company or any successor to the Company.
DIRECTORS' FEES
Ten of the fourteen present directors are not salaried employees of the
Company or its subsidiaries. For their services, those directors are paid a
retainer at the annual rate of $32,000 or, in the case of Chairmen of Board
Committees, $36,000, plus a fee of $2,000 per day for each day upon which one
or more Board or Board Committee meetings are attended. Each such director also
receives a $2,000 annual tax allowance. Salaried employees receive no
additional compensation for their services as directors. Directors are
permitted to defer receipt of directors' fees until their retirement or other
termination of status as a director. Deferred amounts (at the election of the
director) either accrue interest at rates fixed from time to time by the
Executive Committee or are treated as having been invested in Common Stock of
the Company and thus are valued according to fluctuations in the market price
of the Common Stock. In calendar 1993, Peter J. Fluor, William R. Grant, Robert
V. Lindsay and Vilma S. Martinez chose to defer all of their directors' fees
and each elected the Common Stock valuation method. Martha R. Seger chose to
defer 25% of her retainer.
Under the Company's Retirement Plan for Outside Directors, those directors
who have not previously served in the management of the Company or a subsidiary
and who have served as a director for at least six years are entitled to annual
retirement payments in an amount equal to their retainer at retirement.
Payments continue for the life of the director but not to exceed the number of
years of the director's prior board service.
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
PROPOSAL 2
The Board has appointed the firm of Ernst & Young, which firm was engaged as
independent auditors for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1993, to audit the
financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending October 31,
1994. A proposal to ratify this appointment is being presented to the
stockholders at the annual meeting. A representative of Ernst & Young is
expected to be present at the meeting and available to respond to appropriate
questions and, although that firm has indicated that no statement will be made,
an opportunity for a statement will be provided.
16
<PAGE>
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO 1988 FLUOR EXECUTIVE
STOCK PLAN AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE GOALS
PROPOSAL 3
Legislation adopted by Congress in 1993 places new restrictions that begin to
apply in 1994 on the deductibility of executive compensation paid by public
companies. Under these new restrictions, the Company will not be able to deduct
compensation paid to its five Named Executive Officers in excess of $1,000,000
unless the compensation meets the definition of "performance-based
compensation" set forth in the legislation. Non-deductibility would result in
additional tax costs to the Company and its shareholders. The shareholder
approval requested by this proposal will assist in enabling awards made under
the Company's long-term incentive program (e.g. stock options, restricted
stock, restricted units and cash incentive awards) to meet the requirements to
qualify as "performance-based compensation", thereby enabling the company to
achieve maximum tax deductibility of such compensation costs.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
To bring future grants of options, SAR's and restricted stock under the 1988
Fluor Executive Stock Plan (the "Stock Plan") into full conformity with the
performance-based compensation requirements, the Board has adopted, and
proposes that the shareholders approve, the following limitations on grants
made under the Stock Plan:
(a) During the ten year term of the Stock Plan, no one individual may, in
the aggregate, receive more than 15% of the total shares and rights
authorized under the Stock Plan.
(b) No restricted stock may be awarded in any fiscal year unless, for the
immediately preceding fiscal year, the return on equity for Fluor's common
shareholders exceeds the yield on ten-year U.S. Treasury Notes by more than
3% and, in any fiscal year, no individual may be granted more than 15,000
shares of restricted stock.
(c) Grants will be made only to Company or subsidiary officers or members
of the management control group of the Company.
The material terms of the Stock Plan are set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto.
CASH COMPENSATION
To qualify as "performance-based compensation", the new tax rules also
require, for performance plans involving cash awards, that the performance
goals under which the compensation is to be paid be disclosed to, and approved
by the company's shareholders. Accordingly, approval of the following
eligibility criteria and performance goals for awards made under the Fluor
Special Executive Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") is hereby requested:
(a) Long Term Incentive Awards--These awards may be made annually to
Company or subsidiary officers or other members of the management control
group of the Company. Each award represents the right to receive cash if
certain EBIT levels set by the Organization and Compensation Committee are
attained over a three year period. The Committee establishes threshold,
target and maximum EBIT amounts for the three year period. A graded series
of award levels has been established and the maximum amount payable to the
highest award level is $600,000 if the maximum EBIT amount is achieved or
surpassed. If the cumulative EBIT for the period falls between the
threshold amount and the target amount or between the target amount and the
maximum amount, then the amount of the award is prorated accordingly. No
additional amount is payable if EBIT exceeds the maximum amount.
(b) Restricted Units--When an executive is granted restricted stock under
the Stock Plan, he may also be granted restricted units which become
payable as the restrictions lapse on the restricted stock. As with the
restricted stock, no restricted units may be awarded in any fiscal year
unless, for the
17
<PAGE>
immediately preceding fiscal year, the average return on equity for Fluor's
common shareholders exceeds the yield on ten-year U. S. Treasury Notes by
more than 3%. Also, awards may only be made to Company or subsidiary
officers, or other members of the management control group of the Company.
The cash from the restricted units is used to pay the income tax
withholding arising from the lapse of the restrictions on the restricted
stock. The purpose of the restricted units is to encourage executive stock
ownership by eliminating the need to dispose of a portion of newly vested
shares to pay the withholding taxes. As with the related restricted stock,
the restricted units vest ratably over a ten year period and the unvested
portion is forfeited if the executive terminates his employment for any
reason other than death, disability or qualified retirement. The initial
value of each unit is equal to the value of a share of the company's Common
Stock on the date of grant and the number of units granted is calculated by
reference to the applicable federal and state employment and income tax
withholding rates. The value of each restricted unit fluctuates in
accordance with changes in the value of the Common Stock. No individual may
be granted more than 10,000 restricted units in any fiscal year.
The material terms of the Incentive Plan are set forth in Exhibit B attached
hereto.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL: COMPENSATION CEILING FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS & DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 4
Mr. and Mrs. Murray and Beatrice M. Katz, 11435 Monterey Drive, Silver
Spring, Maryland 20902 who own 200 shares of Fluor Common Stock, have given the
Company notice that they intend to present the following proposal for action at
the annual meeting:
RESOLVED: That the shareholders of Fluor Corporation recommend that the Board
of Directors take the necessary steps to institute a salary and compensation
ceiling such that as to future employment contracts, no senior executive
officer or director of the Company receive combined salary and other
compensation which is more than two times the salary provided to the President
of the United States, that is, no more than $400,000.
REASONS: There is no corporation which exceeds the size and complexity of
operation of the government of the United States of which the President is the
chief executive officer. Even most government agencies far exceed the size, as
measured by personnel and budget, of most private corporations. The President
of the United States now receives a salary of $200,000; even heads of agencies
and members of Congress are paid only somewhat in excess of $100,000. The
recommended ceiling is sufficient to motivate any person to do his best.
While the duties of the President of the United States are not comparable to
those of senior executive officers or directors (the President has a much more
demanding job), and while the President has many valuable compensations, we use
the salary of the President only as a reference point for the shareholders to
consider as they evaluate this resolution.
Officers of public corporations are the employees and not the owners, except
as they may be shareholders in common with other stockholders. Yet, officers
give the appearance that they run the corporations primarily for their benefit
rather than for the benefit of the shareholders. Thus, they may drain away
millions of dollars in salary, stock options and other compensation. When more
than the recommended ceiling on salary and compensation is taken, this is an
expression of greed and abuse of power.
Usually, there is no direct correlation between the profitability of a
corporation and the compensation to officers. In fact, in many corporations,
compensation increases even as profits fall. It is apparent that high
compensation does not usually serve as an incentive for a better run or more
profitable corporation. Obscene
18
<PAGE>
compensation packages illustrate the power of the Board of Directors, a closed
group which perpetuates itself, by determining who is to be selected to the
Board and who is to be an officer of the company, as well as the compensation
to be received. The Board of Directors does not own the corporation, but it can
run the corporation as if it were their property. There is no shortage of
qualified people who would gladly step in and do as good a job as the incumbent
officers of the Corporation and who would have no hesitation serving within the
aforementioned pay ceiling.
Any officer who believes he can better the corporation should be sufficiently
motivated to purchase stock on the open market or to receive stock options as
part of his salary and compensation package. To remain competitive in world
markets we must cut our costs and not overcompensate directors and officers.
If you AGREE, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution.
STATEMENT BY DIRECTORS IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSAL
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote "AGAINST" this proposal
for the following reasons:
Flexibility in the compensation policies followed by the Company is critical
to being able to attract, retain and motivate management of the quality and
caliber that has achieved the outstanding results and increases in value
shareholders have enjoyed over the years. Adoption of the Proposal would apply
a rigid standard to determining the salary of executive officers. It would
remove from the Organization and Compensation Committee, which is composed
entirely of outside Directors, the flexibility to craft the kind of competitive
salary and compensation packages which have been proven necessary to attract,
retain and motivate the highly qualified executive officers and employees the
Company has been able to employ in a competitive industry and a competitive
economy.
In creating a total compensation package for senior executive officers, each
person's total compensation package is linked to financial performance and
enhanced shareholder value and is designed to align his or her economic
interest with that of the shareholders. The Organization and Compensation
Committee evaluates and structures the compensation programs for executive
officers on an ongoing basis and regularly reviews those compensation programs
in light of the results the executives have achieved for the shareholders.
After a comprehensive review of the compensation policies followed and salaries
paid by a broad range of general industry companies, and a review of each
officer's performance and Company results as a whole and of the operations
within the purview of such officer, executive base salaries are determined by
the Organization and Compensation Committee at levels that the Committee
believes to be at approximately the 50th percentile of the general industry
group, with salary plus bonus at the 50th to 60th percentile, and total
compensation up to the 75th percentile based upon enhanced shareholder value
and achievement of earnings above target levels.
Company stockholders have had the opportunity to vote on and have approved
several of these long-term incentive programs over the years, including 1988
Fluor Executive Stock Plan and last year's amendments to that plan and this
years performance pay related approvals which are contained in Proposal 3 on
this year's agenda.
The imposition of an artificial ceiling on compensation would impose
competitive obstacles to attracting, retaining and motivating the best
qualified executive officers to manage your Company, obstacles to which our
competitors are not subject and which would place your Company at an
extraordinary disadvantage in the competition for such individuals.
Moreover, the proposed limitation would have no practical application to non-
employee directors since their compensation is only a small fraction of the
proposed ceiling. It should also be noted that the Company does not have
employment contracts with its Named Executive Officers or directors, so the
proposal, which by its term is limited to "employment contracts" would have no
application.
19
<PAGE>
The Board also disagrees with the assumptions underlying the Proposal and the
Proponent's supporting statement. Inasmuch as the positions, obligations,
responsibilities and reasons for serving as a public servant or in private
enterprise are not comparable, the compensation of the President is not a valid
reference point for establishing senior executive compensation levels.
For these reasons, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
"AGAINST" this proposal.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Company does not intend to present any other business for action at the
meeting and does not know of any other business intended to be presented by
others.
The Company's Bylaws require that, for other business to be properly brought
before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the Company must have received
written notice thereof not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the
annual meeting (or not later than 10 days after public disclosure of the annual
meeting). The Notice must set forth (a) a brief description of the business
proposed to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting
such business, (b) the stockholder's name and address, and the number of shares
of Common Stock beneficially owned by the stockholder, and (c) any material
interest of the stockholder in such business.
STOCKHOLDERS' PROPOSALS FOR 1995 ANNUAL MEETING
Any proposal of a stockholder intended to be presented at the Company's 1995
annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Company for inclusion in
the proxy statement and form of proxy for that meeting no later than October 7,
1994.
/s/ P.J. TRIMBLE
P.J. TRIMBLE
Senior Vice President-Law and
Secretary
January 30, 1994
Irvine, California
20
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT A
The 1988 Fluor Executive Stock Plan (the "Stock Plan") contemplates grants of
stock options and stock appreciation rights, awards of restricted stock and
stock payments. Subject to the usual anti-dilution provisions for stock splits,
stock dividends, etc., the number of shares of stock and rights with respect to
shares which may be issued under the Stock Plan may not exceed 5,500,000 shares
of Common Stock plus that number of the 2,686,214 shares of Common Stock
currently outstanding or reserved for issuance as stock options, restricted
stock awards or rights with respect to shares under previously approved Company
stock plans which subsequently expire or are otherwise terminated. The Stock
Plan is administered by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the
Board (the "Committee"), no member of which is eligible to participate in the
Stock Plan. Those employees eligible to participate are Company or subsidiary
officers or other members of the management control group of the Company
(currently a group of approximately 675 employees). The Committee has sole
discretion to determine from among eligible employees those to whom, and the
time or times at which, grants or awards are made, the number of shares of
stock or stock appreciation rights subject to each grant or award and the
period for the exercise of options or stock appreciation rights. As now
amended, the Stock Plan also provides that no one individual may receive more
than fifteen percent (15%) of the total shares and rights authorized under the
Plan.
The per share market value of the Company Common Stock on January 18, 1994
was $42.875. Grants or awards must be made within ten years from the effective
date of the Stock Plan and the period for the exercise of each option or stock
appreciation right cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant. Change of
control provisions are the same as those set forth in the section entitled
"Change of Control Provisions in Certain Plans", located at page 16 hereof.
The Stock Plan may be amended from time to time by the Board of Directors
except that no amendment to increase the total number of shares of Common Stock
subject to the Stock Plan, to materially increase the benefits accruing to
participants under the Stock Plan, to withdraw Stock Plan administration from
the Committee, or to permit any member of the Committee to be eligible for
grants or awards under the Stock Plan, may be adopted without the approval of
the stockholders of the Company.
STOCK OPTIONS
Under the Stock Plan, the Committee may grant non-qualified and incentive
stock options to eligible employees to purchase shares of Common Stock from the
Company. The Stock Plan confers on the Committee discretion, with respect to
any such stock option, to determine the number and purchase price of the shares
subject to the option, the term of each option and the time or times during its
term when the option becomes exercisable. The purchase price for any stock
option may not be less than the fair market value of the shares subject to the
option on the date of grant. The number of shares subject to an option will be
reduced proportionately to the extent that the optionee exercises a related
stock appreciation right. The Committee may not accelerate the exercisability
of any option or determine to cancel stock options in order to make a
participant eligible for the grant of an option at a lower price.
The option price may be paid in cash or by delivery of shares of Common Stock
valued at their fair market value at the time of purchase or any combination of
cash and Common Stock.
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
A stock appreciation right or "SAR" is a right to receive, without payment to
the Company, an amount which is determined pursuant to the formula described
below. A SAR may be granted with respect to any stock option granted under the
Stock Plan (a "related SAR") or alone, without reference to any stock option (a
"free-standing SAR"). A related SAR may be granted concurrently with the grant
of such option or at such later time as determined by the Committee and as to
all or any portion of the shares subject to the
A-1
<PAGE>
option. As a matter of policy, the Organization and Compensation Committee
determined in 1990 not to grant SARs to any of the Named Executive Officers of
the Company.
The Stock Plan confers on the Committee discretion to determine the number of
shares to which an SAR will relate as well as the duration and exercisability
of a SAR. In the case of a related SAR, the number of shares of Common Stock to
which the SAR pertains will be reduced in the same proportion that the holder
exercises the related option. The Committee may not accelerate the
exercisability of any SAR.
Upon exercise of a SAR, the holder is entitled to receive an amount which is
equal to the aggregate amount of the appreciation in the shares of Common Stock
as to which the SAR is exercised.
For this purpose, the "appreciation" in the shares consists of the amount by
which the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the exercise date
exceeds (a) in the case of a related SAR, the purchase price of the shares
under the option or (b) in the case of a free-standing SAR, an amount
determined by the Committee at the time of grant. In no event, may the amount
determined under (a) or (b) above, be less than the fair market value of a
share of Common Stock on the grant date. In the case of a related SAR, the
Committee may authorize payment of the amount of this appreciation to the
holder of the SAR by the delivery of Common Stock, cash, or any combination of
Common Stock and cash. In the case of a free-standing SAR, payment of the
amount of appreciation may be made only in cash.
PROVISIONS COMMON TO BOTH OPTIONS AND SAR'S
Except as otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole discretion at the
time of grant, no option or SAR may be exercised unless and until the holder
has remained in the employ of the Company or its subsidiaries for one year from
the date of grant, except in the case of death, retirement or disability as
described below. No option or SAR will be transferable by a holder other than
by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of a
holder, the option or SAR will be exercisable only by him. In the event of
termination of employment, other than by death or disability, of a holder whose
option or SAR has been in effect one year, the holder will have three months
after such termination within which to exercise the option or SAR to the extent
it was exercisable at the date of such termination. The option or SAR of a
holder who dies, retires or becomes permanently and totally disabled before it
has been in effect for one year becomes fully exercisable on the date of death,
retirement or disability. Upon termination of employment of a holder by reason
of retirement, death or permanent total disability, his option or SAR remains
exercisable for three years thereafter to the extent it was exercisable on the
date of such termination.
RESTRICTED STOCK
Restricted stock consists of the transfer by the Company to an eligible
employee of one or more shares of Common Stock which are subject to
restrictions on their sale or other transfer by the employee. The specific
nature of the restrictions and the circumstance of their lapse will be
determined by the Committee at the time of grant. Subject to the specified
restrictions and the other requirements of the Stock Plan a participant
receiving restricted stock shall have all of the rights of a stockholder as to
those shares. Moreover, as now amended, no eligible employee may be awarded
restricted stock during any fiscal year unless, for the preceding fiscal year,
average return on equity to Fluor's common stockholders exceeded the yield for
ten-year U.S. Treasury notes by more than three percent. The Committee is
authorized to establish award grade levels and to determine the number of
shares which may be annually awarded to the participants in each grade level if
the return on equity requirement is met. The maximum number of shares which may
be awarded annually to any participant is 15,000. The Committee has the
discretion to award any employee less than the number of shares applicable to
his assigned award grade level.
STOCK PAYMENTS
The Stock Plan confers on the Committee the discretion to approve payment in
the form of Common Stock in an amount based on its then fair market value for
all or any portion of the cash compensation (other than base salary) that would
otherwise be payable to an employee.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
Under existing federal income tax provisions, an employee who receives a
stock option or SAR under the Stock Plan or who receives shares of restricted
stock under the Stock Plan which are subject to restrictions
A-2
<PAGE>
which create a "substantial risk of forfeiture" (within the meaning of section
83 of the Internal Revenue Code) will not normally realize any income, nor will
the Company normally receive any deduction for federal income tax purposes, in
the year of the grant or award.
When a non-qualified stock option granted pursuant to the Stock Plan is
exercised, the employee will realize ordinary income measured by the difference
between the aggregate purchase price of the shares of Common Stock as to which
the option is exercised and the aggregate fair market value of shares of the
Common Stock on the exercise date, and the Company will be entitled to a
deduction equal to the amount the employee is required to treat as ordinary
income.
Options which qualify as incentive stock options are entitled to special tax
treatment. If shares purchased pursuant to the exercise of such an option are
not disposed of by the optionee within two years from the date of granting of
the option or within one year after the issue of the shares to the optionee
upon exercise of the incentive option, whichever is longer, then (i) no income
will be recognized to the optionee upon the exercise of the option; (ii) any
gain or loss will be recognized to the optionee only upon ultimate disposition
of the shares; (iii) the optionee's basis in the shares purchased will be equal
to the amount paid for such shares; and the Company will not be entitled to a
federal income tax deduction in connection with the exercise of the option. The
difference between the option price and the fair market value of the shares
acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option will be treated as an "item
of tax preference" for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. In addition,
incentive stock options exercised more than three months after termination of
employment, other than by reason of death, are treated as non-qualified
options.
If the optionee disposes of the shares acquired by exercise of an incentive
stock option before the expiration of the holding period described above, the
optionee must treat as ordinary income in the year of that disposition an
amount equal to the difference between the optionee's basis in the shares and
the lesser of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise or
the selling price. In addition, the Company will be entitled to a deduction
equal to the amount the employee is required to treat as ordinary income.
If the exercise price of an option is paid by surrender of previously owned
shares, the basis of the previously owned shares of Common Stock is generally
carried over to the new issued shares. If, however, the option is an incentive
stock option, the optionee will recognize gain if the shares surrendered were
acquired through the exercise of an incentive stock option and have not been
held for the applicable holding period. This gain will be added to the basis of
the shares received in replacement of the previously owned shares.
When an SAR granted pursuant to the Stock Plan is exercised, the employee
will realize ordinary income in the year the right is exercised equal to the
amount of the appreciation received and the Company will be entitled to a
deduction in the same year and in the same amount.
An employee who receives restricted stock subject to restrictions which
create a "substantial risk of forfeiture" (within the meaning of section 83 of
the Internal Revenue Code) will normally realize taxable income on the date the
shares become transferable or no longer subject to substantial risk of
forfeiture or on the date of their earlier disposition. The amount of such
taxable income will be equal to the amount by which the fair market value of
the shares of Common Stock on the date such restrictions lapse (or any earlier
date on which the shares become transferable or are disposed of) exceeds their
purchase price, if any. An employee may elect, however, to include in income in
the year of grant the excess of the fair market value of the shares of Common
Stock (without regard to any restrictions) on the date of grant.
Upon accelerated exercisability of options and SARs and accelerated lapsing
of restrictions upon restricted stock in connection with a change of control of
the Company, certain amounts associated with such awards could, depending upon
the individual circumstances of the recipient participant, constitute "excess
parachute payments" under the golden parachute provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code. Pursuant to these provisions a participant will be subject to a
20% excise tax on any excess parachute payment and the
A-3
<PAGE>
Company will be denied any deduction with respect to such excess parachute
payment. The limit on the deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code is also reduced by the amount of any excess parachute
payments. Whether amounts constitute excess parachute payments depends upon,
among other things, the value of the awards accelerated and the past
compensation of the participant.
Taxable compensation earned by an employee in respect of stock options, SARs
or restricted stock under the Stock Plan is intended to constitute qualified
"performance-based compensation" and the Company should therefore be entitled
to a deduction for compensation paid in the same amount as income is realized
by the employee without any reduction under the limitations on the deduction of
compensation paid to certain Named Executive Officers which are set forth in
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
A-4
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT B
The 1988 Fluor Special Executive Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan")
contemplates grants of long term incentive awards and restricted units, both
payable only in cash. The Incentive Plan is administered by the Organization
and Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Committee"), no member of which
is eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. Those employees eligible to
participate are Company or subsidiary officers or other members of the
management control group of the Company (currently a group of approximately 675
employees). The Committee has sole discretion to determine from among eligible
employees those to whom, and the time or times at which awards are made, the
amount of the awards (subject to the maximum allowable), and the EBIT levels
required for payment of long-term incentive awards.
Change of Control provisions are the same as those set forth in the section
entitled "Change of Control Provisions in Certain Plans" located at page 16
hereof. Otherwise, if a participant's employment terminates for any reason
other than death or permanent and total disability, prior to the time the
award, or any portion thereof, becomes earned and payable, then all of the
participant's rights to the award or any unearned portion thereof, shall also
terminate.
LONG TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS
These awards may be made annually to eligible employees. Each award
represents the right to receive cash if certain EBIT levels set by the
Committee are attained over a three year period. The Committee establishes
threshold, target and maximum EBIT amounts for the three year period. A graded
series of award levels has been established and each level specifies the amount
to be paid if either the threshold, target or maximum EBIT is attained. If the
cumulative EBIT for the period falls between the threshold amount and the
target amount or between the target amount and the maximum amount, then the
amount of the award is prorated accordingly. No additional amount is payable if
EBIT exceeds the maximum amount. The maximum amount of any award may not exceed
$600,000. A participant may elect to defer all or a portion of his award.
RESTRICTED UNITS
When an executive is granted restricted stock under the Stock Plan, he may
also be granted restricted units which become payable as the restrictions lapse
on the restricted stock. As with the restricted stock, no restricted units may
be awarded in any fiscal year unless, for the immediately preceding fiscal
year, the average return on equity for Fluor's common shareholders exceeds the
yield on ten-year U. S. Treasury Notes by more than 3%. The cash from the
restricted units is used to pay the income and employment tax withholding
arising from the lapse of the restrictions on the restricted stock. The purpose
of the restricted units is to encourage executive stock ownership by
eliminating the need to dispose of a portion of newly vested shares to pay the
withholding amounts. As with the related restricted stock, the restricted units
vest ratably over a ten year period and the unvested portion is forfeited if
the executive terminates his employment for any reason other than death,
disability or qualified retirement. The initial value of each unit is equal to
the value of a share of the Company's common stock on the date of grant and the
number of units granted is calculated by reference to the applicable federal
and state income and employment and withholding tax rates. The value of the
unit fluctuates in accordance with the value of the common stock. The Committee
uses the same award grade levels established for restricted stock awards under
the Stock Plan and determines the number of restricted units which may be
annually awarded to the participants in each grade level if the return on
equity requirement is met. The maximum number of units which may be awarded
annually to each participant is 10,000. As with the restricted stock, the
Committee has the discretion to award any employee less than the number of
units applicable to his assigned award grade level.
B-1
<PAGE>
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED, [X] Please mark
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE FIVE NOMINEES your votes
AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3 AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 4. as this
------------- -------------------------- ---------------
COMMON D.R.S. RESTRICTED
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the nominees on
Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.
1. Election of Class I Directors: David P. Gardner, Gerald M. Glenn,
William R. Grant, Vincent L. Kontny, Vilma S. Martinez
FOR all nominees listed (except WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
as marked to the contrary) to vote for all nominees listed
[ ] [ ]
INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote
for any individual nominee, strike a line
through the nominees's name in the list above.
2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young as auditors for 1994.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
3. Approval of amendments to 1988 Fluor Executive Stock Plan and executive
compensation performance goals.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 4.
4. Stockholder proposal regarding a senior executive and director compensation
ceiling.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ]
5. In their discretion the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other
business as may properly come before the meeting and any and all postponements
or adjournments thereof.
Please sign exactly as shown at left. Joint owners should each sign.
Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians and attorneys should
so indicate when signing. Corporations and partnerships should sign
in full corporate or partnership name by an authorized officer.
Dated , 1994
----------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature of Stockholder
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature of Stockholder
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
[LOGO] FLUOR CORPORATION
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING MARCH 8,1994
The undersigned, a stockholder of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, acknowledges receipt of a Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, the accompanying Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to
Stockholders for the year ended October 31, 1993; and, revoking any proxy
previously given, hereby constitutes and appoints L. G. McCraw, V. L. Kontny and
P. J. Trimble, and each of them, the true and lawful agents and proxies of the
undersigned with full power of substitution in each, to vote the shares of
Common Stock of FLUOR CORPORATION standing in the name of the undersigned at the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of FLUOR CORPORATION, on Tuesday, March 8, 1994
at 9:00 A.M., and at any adjournment or postponement thereof with respect to the
proposals listed on the reverse side.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
HEREBY BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY
WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE, FOR PROPOSAL 2, FOR
PROPOSAL 3 AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 4.
(continued and to be signed on reverse side)
<PAGE>
[MAP GOES HERE]
INSIDE BACK COVER
<PAGE>
GRAPHIC MATERIAL CROSS-REFERENCE PAGE
PHOTOS OF THE CLASS I DIRECTOR NOMINEES APPEAR TO THE LEFT OF EACH RESPECTIVE
NAME ON PAGES 2 AND 3.
A PERFORMANCE GRAPH SHOWING A COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG FLUOR CORPORATION, S&P 500 INDEX AND PEER GROUP APPEARS ON PAGE 15. (THE
NUMBERS USED IN GRAPH APPEAR ON PAGE 15.)
A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION, DATE AND TIME OF THE ANNUAL MEETING APPEARS ON THE
INSIDE BACK COVER.
