Registration Statement No. 333-19877
Rule 424(b)(1)
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
EXCHANGE OFFER
SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS DATED
DECEMBER 2, 1996
Fortune Petroleum Corporation ("Fortune" or the "Company") hereby
supplements its Prospectus dated December 2, 1996, pursuant to which the Company
made an offer to the holders of its Convertible Subordinated Debentures due
December 31, 1997 (the "Debentures") to exchange such Debentures for shares for
the Company's Common Stock and Common Stock Warrants. This supplement must be
read in conjunction with the Prospectus, a copy of which is attached hereto.
CHANGE IN TERMS
The terms of the Exchange Offer are hereby modified as follows:
1. The Exchange Price has been reduced from $3.4965 per share to $3.1847
per share. Each Debentureholder will receive 314 Common Stock shares for
each $1,000 principal amount of Debentures tendered in the Exchange
Offer. The amount and terms of the 250 Exchange Warrants per $1,000
principal value of Debenture which will be received by Debentureholders
who accept the offer has not changed.
2. The Closing Date of the Exchange Offer will be 5:00 P.M., Houston, Texas
time, February 5, 1997 (the "Revised Exchange Offer"). The Company, at
its sole discretion, may extend the expiration of the Revised Exchange
Offer for additional periods aggregating not more than 30 days in total.
The Revised Exchange Offer hereby supersedes and replaces the prior
Exchange Offer, and any amendments or extensions thereto.
The number of warrants issuable to the Co-Conversion Agents has not
changed; however, such warrants will be exercisable at $3.1847 per share. Except
as modified hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Exchange Offer remain
the same as set forth in the Prospectus. (See "Exchange Offer" in the
Prospectus.) Further, the federal income tax consequences of an exchange of
Debentures for shares of Common Stock and Exchange Warrants remain the same as
described in the Prospectus. (See "Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations" in
the Prospectus.)
To the extent any Debentureholder has previously tendered any shares in the
Exchange Offer, the tendering Debentureholder will be given the right to rescind
his or her tender. If such tender is not rescinded by 5:00 P.M., Houston, Texas
time, February 5, 1997, it will be deemed accepted on the above revised terms.
THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE "RISK FACTORS"
BEGINNING ON PAGE 6 OF THE PROSPECTUS
THE REVISED EXCHANGE OFFER EXPIRES AT 5:00 P.M., HOUSTON, TEXAS TIME,
FEBRUARY 5, 1997
THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT TO THE PROSPECTUS IS JANUARY 22, 1997
S-1
<PAGE>
DILUTION AND CAPITALIZATION
As a result of the change in the terms of the Exchange Offer, the non-cash
debt conversion expense which the Company expects to incur in connection with
the Exchange Offer is estimated to be $896,000, assuming conversion of all of
the Debentures and using a market price for Fortune Common Stock of $3.00 per
share. The "As Adjusted" columns in the following table reflects the effect of
recording this estimated non-cash debt conversion expense. See "Capitalization"
in the Prospectus. At September 30, 1996, the pro forma effect of the revised
Exchange Offer terms on the capitalization of the Company would be as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
--------------------------------------------
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED(1) (2)
------------ ----------------------------
80% CONVERSION 100% CONVERSION
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current liabilities (including current
portion of long term debt) .............. $ 1,842,000 $ 1,842,000 $ 1,842,000
============ ============ ============
Long-term debt (excluding current portion) $ 1,680,000 $ 336,000 $ --
------------ ------------ ------------
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value,
2,000,000 shares authorized, none
outstanding Common stock, $.01 par
value, 40,000,000 shares authorized,
11,431,664 shares outstanding at
September 30, 1996, 12,276,984 shares
outstanding after 80% Debenture
Conversion and 12,385,314 shares
outstanding after
100% Debenture Conversion ............... $ 114,000 $ 123,000 $ 124,000
Additional paid-in capital ............... $ 28,101,000 $ 31,250,000 $ 31,752,000
Accumulated deficit ...................... $(16,008,000) $(16,725,000) $(16,904,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net stockholders' equity ................. $ 12,207,000 $ 14,648,000 $ 14,972,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total capitalization .................. $ 13,887,000 $ 14,984,000 $ 14,972,000
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
- ----------------
(1) Assumes conversion of Debentures but not the exercise of any Exchange
Warrants or Co-Conversion Agent warrants.
(2) The pro forma amounts have been adjusted to give effect to a private
placement equity transaction completed by the Company in December 1996
wherein the Company sold 412,000 Common Shares and received net proceeds of
$1,149,480.
As a result of the change in terms of the Exchange Offer, and assuming
conversion of all of the Debentures and after giving effect to the private
placement of equity referred to in the capitalization table above, the net
tangible book value of the Company at September 30, 1996 would have been $1.21
per share of Common Stock. This represents an increase in net tangible book
value to existing stockholders and a substantial dilution to new investors
acquiring Common Stock through the conversion of their Debentures.
S-2
<PAGE>
RECENT STOCK PRICE
Since the date of the Prospectus, the high and low closing prices of the
Common Stock and the Public Warrants on the AMEX have been as follows:
COMMON STOCK WARRANTS
------------ --------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
---- --- ---- ---
1997
First Quarter (through
January 14, 1997) $3-1/4 $2-1/2 $1-3/4 $1-1/2
1996
Fourth Quarter (November 25, 1996
through December 31, 1996) $3-1/4 $2-7/16 $1-3/4 $1-3/8
On January 14, 1996, the closing price of the Common Stock on the AMEX was
$3.25 per share. The Exchange Warrants to be received by the Debentureholders
who convert will NOT be listed or traded on the AMEX, and no assurance can be
given that any market will develop for the Exchange Warrants. (See "Price Range
of Common Stock" in the Prospectus.)
RECENT SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS
On December 20, 1996, the discovery drilled on the Company's East Bayou
Sorrel prospect, in Iberville Parish, Louisiana, began producing and reached a
production rate of 1,148 BOPD and 1,115 MCFD on an 11/64ths inch choke with
flowing tubing pressure of 6,920 psi, before being shut in on January 10, 1997,
to convert the production from temporary to permanent facilities. The conversion
to the permanent production facilities is expected to be completed the week of
January 20th, 1997, whereupon the well will be put back on production. (See
"Business and Properties" in the Prospectus.)
S-3
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
493,350 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
500,250 STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS
EXCHANGE OFFER
Fortune Petroleum Corporation ("Fortune" or the "Company") hereby offers to
holders of its 10-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due December 31, 1997
(the "Debentures") the right to convert such Debentures into 286 shares of
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Common Stock") and 250 Common Stock
Purchase Warrants (the "Exchange Warrants") for each $1,000 principal amount of
Debentures held on November 22, 1996 (the "Record Date"). The Common Stock
received by the Debentureholders who convert, including any Common Stock
received through exercise of the Exchange Warrants, will not be tradable during
the first 90 days following the Closing Date (as defined below). The conversion
ratio for the Common Stock portion of the Exchange Offer has been determined on
the basis of a per share price of $3.4965 per share (the "Exchange Price"). On
November 22, 1996, the last reported sale price of the Common Stock on the
American Stock Exchange (the "AMEX") was $3-3/16 per share. Unless at least 80%
in principal amount of the Debentures is converted in this offering, no
Debentures will be converted. (See "Exchange Offer")
The Exchange Warrants will be exercisable for a period of three years from
the Effective Date (as defined below) at the following exercise prices: one-half
of the Exchange Warrants issued to a Debentureholder will be exercisable at a
price of $4.00 per share, and one-half will be exercisable at $5.00 per share.
The Exchange Warrants will be callable by the Company at any time after the
closing price of the Common Stock on the AMEX equals or exceeds $6.00 for ten
(10) consecutive trading days. (See "Description of Securities - Debentures" and
"- Exchange Warrants")
The Common Stock is listed and traded on the AMEX under the symbol FPX. The
Debentures are traded in the over-the-counter market. Shares of Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of outstanding Debentures and upon exercise of the
Exchange Warrants have been approved for listing upon notice of issuance on the
AMEX. The Exchange Warrants will NOT be listed or traded on the AMEX, and no
assurance can be given that any market will develop for the Exchange Warrants.
(See "Price Range of Common Stock")
Toluca Pacific Securities Corporation and Mr Brent W. Berry, Branch Manager,
Brookstreet Securities Corporation, will act as the Co-Conversion Agents in
connection with this offering and will be compensated by the Company for
services rendered in this Exchange Offer. Debentureholders will have a period of
45 DAYS from the date of this prospectus (the "Effective Date") in which to
elect to convert their Debentures into Common Stock and Exchange Warrants. THIS
OFFERING WILL EXPIRE ON JANUARY 16, 1997, unless extended by the Company for up
to an additional 45 days (the "Closing Date"). (See "Exchange Offer")
No assurance can be given that any of the Debentures will be converted in
this offering, and the Company will not receive any proceeds from the conversion
of Debentures into shares of Common Stock, although it will be relieved of
$1,725,000 of outstanding long term debt if all Debentures are exchanged. (See
"Capitalization" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations") Further, no assurance can be given that
any of the Exchange Warrants will be exercised. If all Exchange Warrants were to
be exercised, the Company would receive gross proceeds of $1,940,625. Whether or
not any Debentureholders convert their Debentures into shares of Common Stock
and Exchange Warrants or the Company receives any proceeds from the exercise of
Exchange Warrants, it will pay all costs of this offering, estimated to be
$62,000.
THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE "RISK FACTORS"
BEGINNING ON PAGE 6
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION
PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS DECEMBER 2, 1996
<PAGE>
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
THE COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO THE INFORMATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED (THE "EXCHANGE ACT") AND, IN ACCORDANCE
THEREWITH, FILES REPORTS AND OTHER INFORMATION WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION"). REPORTS, PROXY AND INFORMATION STATEMENTS FILED
BY THE COMPANY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO THE INFORMATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF
THE EXCHANGE ACT MAY BE INSPECTED AND COPIED AT THE PUBLIC REFERENCE FACILITIES
MAINTAINED BY THE COMMISSION, AT ROOM 1024, JUDICIARY PLAZA BUILDING, 450 FIFTH
STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549, AND THE REGIONAL OFFICES OF THE COMMISSION:
SEVEN WORLD TRADE CENTER, SUITE 1300, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10048, AND KLUCZYNSKI
FEDERAL BUILDING, 230 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET, ROOM 3190, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604.
COPIES OF SUCH MATERIAL MAY BE OBTAINED AT PRESCRIBED RATES FROM THE PUBLIC
REFERENCE SECTION OF THE COMMISSION AT ROOM 1025, JUDICIARY PLAZA BUILDING, 450
FIFTH ST., N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549. IN ADDITION, REPORTS AND OTHER
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COMPANY CAN BE INSPECTED AT THE OFFICES OF THE
AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., 86 TRINITY PLACE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006-1881,
ON WHICH THE COMMON STOCK IS LISTED.
THE COMPANY HAS FILED WITH THE COMMISSION A REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM
S-2 (THE "REGISTRATION STATEMENT") UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED
(THE "ACT"), WITH RESPECT TO THE COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY. THIS PROSPECTUS,
FILED AS PART OF THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT, DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL THE
INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND THE EXHIBITS AND
SCHEDULES THERETO, CERTAIN PORTIONS OF WHICH HAVE BEEN OMITTED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE COMMISSION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION WITH
RESPECT TO THE COMPANY AND THE COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY, REFERENCE IS MADE TO
THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND TO THE EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES THERETO, WHICH MAY
BE INSPECTED AT THE COMMISSION'S OFFICES WITHOUT CHARGE OR COPIES OF WHICH MAY
BE OBTAINED FROM THE COMMISSION UPON PAYMENT OF THE PRESCRIBED FEES. STATEMENTS
MADE IN THE PROSPECTUS AS TO THE CONTENTS OF ANY CONTRACT, AGREEMENT OR DOCUMENT
REFERRED TO ARE NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE, AND IN EACH INSTANCE, REFERENCE IS
MADE TO THE COPY OF SUCH CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT FILED AS AN EXHIBIT TO THE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT.
-------------------
2
<PAGE>
================================================================================
================================================================================
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
================================================================================
================================================================================
THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE MORE DETAILED
INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO APPEARING ELSEWHERE IN
THE PROSPECTUS. CAPITALIZED TERMS ARE USED AS DEFINED IN THE GLOSSARY INCLUDED
ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROSPECTUS. RESERVE ESTIMATES HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE SEC METHOD. THE COMMON STOCK AND EXCHANGE WARRANTS OFFERED HEREBY IN
EXCHANGE FOR THE DEBENTURES INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. PROSPECTIVE
INVESTORS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE MATTERS SET FORTH UNDER THE CAPTION
"RISK FACTORS" IN EVALUATING ACQUISITION OF THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY.
THE COMPANY
Fortune Petroleum Corporation ("Fortune" or the "Company") is an
independent public oil and natural gas company whose primary focus is
exploration for and development of domestic oil and natural gas properties. The
Company's principal properties are located onshore and offshore Louisiana and
onshore Texas.
During 1995, the Company implemented a program of exploration for
significant oil and gas reserves using state-of-the-art three dimensional ("3D")
seismic and computer-aided exploration ("CAEX") technology. The Company believes
that the use of 3D seismic and CAEX technology provides more accurate and
comprehensive geological data for evaluation of drilling prospects than
traditional two dimensional ("2D") evaluation methods. In furtherance of this
exploration program, Fortune formed a strategic partnership with Zydeco Energy,
Inc. in February 1995 (the "Zydeco 3D Venture"), and has since acquired an
interest in over 20 exploration projects (the "Zydeco Projects") in the shallow
Gulf Coast waters of Louisiana. The Company has also acquired interests in
additional exploratory prospects with other industry partners in the Gulf Coast
and is continually evaluating other 3D and 2D exploration projects. At the same
time, the Company seeks to take advantage of attractive acquisition targets
which will enable it to acquire reserves at an attractive price. (See "Business
and Properties - Exploration, Exploitation and Development Activity" and
"Acquisition and Divestiture Activity - South Timbalier Block 76 Acquisition").
ZYDECO 3D VENTURE - Under its exploration agreement with Zydeco, the Company
holds a 50% interest in each of the Zydeco Projects, for which it contributed
$4,800,000, representing its share of the leasehold acquisition and seismic
costs budget for the Zydeco Projects. The Zydeco 3D Venture utilizes
state-of-the-art 3D seismic and CAEX technology in its exploration efforts.
Zydeco has blended these technologies with production data and characteristics
of wells in a particular geographic area and advanced interpretation techniques
(as well as traditional 2D seismic data) to identify the Zydeco Projects. The
Company believes that these techniques in combining existing 3D seismic and CAEX
technology will provide Fortune with a competitive advantage by increasing the
likelihood of finding commercial quantities of oil and gas at lower average
reserve finding costs.
The Company does not currently expect to retain a working interest of more
than 25% in each well drilled on the Zydeco Projects, except in certain
circumstances, and intends to "farmout", on a promoted basis, its remaining
interest to other oil and gas companies. Management believes that the Zydeco 3D
Venture has the potential to add materially to the Company's reserves and,
ultimately, its revenues. No assurance can be given, however, that the drilling
of exploratory or development wells on any of these properties will occur or
will result in the discovery of commercial quantities of oil or natural gas or
that the Company will be able to successfully explore for oil and gas reserves
or ever produce such reserves. (See "Risk Factors").
BUSINESS STRATEGY - The Company has sought to add reserves in the most cost
efficient and effective manner. Prior to mid-1994, the Company focused its
efforts on the acquisition of producing properties in an effort to take
advantage of competitive prices for proved reserves with development potential
in relation to the cost of reserves discovered through exploration activities.
(See "Business and Properties - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity"). In
mid-1994, the Company made a strategic decision to shift its emphasis from the
acquisition of producing properties to exploration for oil and natural gas
reserves, although the Company continues to examine attractive acquisition
opportunities presented to it. This decision was prompted by increasing price
competition for attractive producing properties (caused by larger and better
capitalized companies moving into the acquisition market) and a general
tightening in available financing for acquisitions. (See "Risk Factors")
The Company's decision to shift its emphasis to exploration was further
influenced by several factors which Fortune believes create new opportunities
for exploration. These factors include increased availability of 3D seismic and
CAEX technology at competitive prices and the reallocation of exploration
budgets by major oil companies from domestic activity to international
exploration. To help facilitate its exploration strategy and focus its efforts,
the Company sold all of its California producing properties and prospects in
early 1996. (See "Business and Properties - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity
- - Divestiture of California Properties"). The Company also relocated its
headquarters to Houston, Texas in February 1996.
3
<PAGE>
EXCHANGE OFFER
THE OFFER 286 shares of Common Stock and 250 Exchange Warrants for
each $1,000 principal amount of 10-1/2% Convertible
Subordinated Debentures due December 31, 1997, previously
issued by the Company, held of record on November 22, 1996.
Cash will be issued in lieu of fractional shares. The Common
Stock received by the Debentureholders who convert,
including any Common Stock received in connection with
exercising the Exchange Warrants, will not be tradable
during the first 90 days following the Closing Date.
Debentureholders who convert will NOT be entitled to
interest on their Debentures subsequent to December 31,
1996. (See "Exchange Offer" and "Description of Securities")
Unless at least 80% in principal amount of the Debentures is
converted in this offering, no Debentures will be converted.
(See "Exchange Offer")
DETERMINATION OF The conversion ratio was determined on the basis of a per
EXCHANGE PRICE share price of $3.4965 per share (the "Exchange Price"). On
November 22, 1996, the last reported sale price of the
Common Stock on the AMEX was $3-3/16 per share.
EXCHANGE WARRANTS The Exchange Warrants will be exercisable for a period of
three years from the Effective Date at the following
exercise prices: one-half of the Exchange Warrants issued to
a Debentureholder will be exercisable at $4.00 per share and
one-half at $5.00 per share. The Exchange Warrants will be
callable by the Company at any time after the closing price
of the Common Stock on the AMEX equals or exceed $6.00 for
ten (10) consecutive trading days. (See "Description of
Securities - Debentures" and "Exchange Warrants")
MARKET FOR COMMON The Common Stock is listed and traded on the AMEX under the
STOCK AND WARRANTS symbol FPX. The Debentures are traded in the
over-the-counter market. Shares of Common Stock issuable
upon conversion of outstanding Debentures and upon exercise
of the Exchange Warrants have been approved for listing upon
notice of issuance on the AMEX. The Exchange Warrants will
NOT be listed or traded on the AMEX, and no assurance can be
given that any market will develop for the Exchange
Warrants.
CO-CONVERSION AGENT Toluca Pacific Securities Corporation and Mr Brent W. Berry,
Branch Manager, Brookstreet Securities Corporation, will act
as the Co-Conversion Agents in connection with this offering
and will be compensated by the Company for services rendered
in this Exchange Offer. Debentureholders will have a period
of 45 DAYS from the Effective Date in which to elect to
convert their Debentures into Common Stock and Exchange
Warrants. (See "Exchange Offer")
TERMINATION OFFER THIS OFFER WILL EXPIRE ON JANUARY 16, 1997, unless extended
by the Company for up to an additional forty-five (45) days.
(See "Exchange Offer")
FEDERAL INCOME TAX For information regarding the federal income tax
CONSEQUENCE consequences of acceptance of the Exchange Offer, see
"Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences".
USE OF PROCEEDS No assurance can be given that any of the Debentures will be
converted in this offering, and the Company will not receive
any proceeds from the conversion of Debentures into shares
of Common Stock, although it will be relieved of outstanding
long term debt of $1,380,000 if the minimum of 80% of the
Debentures is converted and $1,725,000 if all of the
Debentures are converted. (See "Capitalization" and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations") Further, no assurance can be
given that any of the Exchange Warrants will be exercised.
If all Exchange Warrants were to be exercised, the Company
would receive gross proceeds of $1,940,625. Whether or not
any Debentureholders convert their Debentures into shares of
Common Stock or the Company receives any proceeds from the
exercise of Exchange Warrants, it will pay all costs of this
offering, estimated to be $62,000.
4
<PAGE>
SUMMARY FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following Summary Condensed Financial Data for the years ended December
31, 1993, 1994, and 1995, and the unaudited financial information for the nine
months ended September 30, 1995 and 1996, are derived from and qualified by
reference to the Company's financial statements, appearing elsewhere herein. The
statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 1996, is
not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The financial information
for each nine month period ended September 30, 1995 and 1996 are unaudited and,
in the opinion of management, include all adjustments that are of a normal
recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation. The Summary Condensed
Financial Data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" appearing elsewhere herein.
SUMMARY CONDENSED FINANCIAL DATA
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------------- -------------------
1993 1994 1995 1995 1996
-------- ------- -------- -------- ---------
(unaudited)
Total Revenues ......... $ 2,834 $ 3,397 $ 3,193 $ 2,183 $ 3,233
Net Loss ............... $(3,654) $(2,943) $(6,214) $(1,614) $ (2,180)
Net Loss per share ..... $ (2.06) $ (1.12) $ (0.95) $ (0.30) $ (0.19)
Net weighted average
shares outstanding .. 1,773 2,639 6,556 5,433 11,285
BALANCE SHEET DATA: DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------- -------------
1993 1994 1995 1996
------- ------- ------- -------
Total Assets ...................$10,454 $11,601 $18,997 $15,729
Total Debt .....................$ 3,003 $ 7,123 $ 4,897 $ 3,155
Net Stockholders' Equity .......$ 6,613 $ 3,665 $13,511 $12,207
Net Stockholders' Equity
Per Share .....................$ 2.50 $ 1.39 $ 1.21 $ 1.07
SUMMARY OPERATING DATA
OPERATING DATA: NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------------- -----------------
1993 1994 1995 1995 1996
------- --------- ------- ------- -------
Net Production:
Crude oil, condensate and
gas liquids (Bbl) ...... 78,737 87,615 91,981 63,300 43,400
Natural gas (Mcf) ........ 723,878 1,016,771 909,000 711,800 796,000
Oil equivalent (BOE) ..... 199,383 257,077 243,481 181,900 176,100
Average sales price:
Crude oil, condensate and
gas liquids ($ per Bbl) $ 14.33 $ 14.14 $ 14.66 $ 14.69 $ 19.61
Natural gas ($ per Mcf) .. $ 2.28 $ 2.09 $ 1.77 $ 1.54 $ 2.49
RESERVES: DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1993 1994 1995
--------- ------- ------
Estimated Net Proved Reserves (1):
Crude oil and condensate (MMBbl) ................ 813 1,647 347
Natural gas (Bcf) ............................... 5.6 5.9 5.9
Estimated future net revenues before
income taxes (in thousands) ..................... $12,835 $15,932 $12,600
Present value of estimated future net revenues
before income taxes (discounted at 10% per annum) $ 8,554 $ 8,148 $ 8,942
(1) Estimates of oil and gas reserves in future years are based in part on the
sales price at December 31st, the Company's year-end; and to the extent that
the cost of producing the oil and gas, plus applicable taxes, from any
particular property exceeds the sales price, the quantity of proved reserves
is reduced. (See "Business and Properties - Oil and Gas Operations-- Oil and
Gas Reserves")
5
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK AND THE EXCHANGE WARRANTS OFFERED HEREBY
INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK DEBENTURES SHOULD NOT BE CONVERTED BY
DEBENTUREHOLDERS WHO CANNOT AFFORD THE LOSS OF THEIR ENTIRE INVESTMENT.
PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER ALL OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED
IN THIS PROSPECTUS, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING RISK FACTORS:
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY
CHANGE TO EXPLORATORY DRILLING STRATEGY. Fortune has recently changed its
business strategy from the acquisition of producing oil and gas properties with
anticipated development potential to a strategy which primarily stresses
exploratory drilling for oil and natural gas. Such a change means that the
Company will no longer be assured of acquiring producing oil and gas wells when
it expends funds for the acquisition of an interest in property. It also means
that when the Company expends funds to drill a well, the risk that the Company
will drill a dry hole and thus be unsuccessful in finding any oil and gas is
substantially increased. In such event, the Company would receive no return on
its investment. Were such a strategy to be pursued long enough, without success,
it could require the Company ultimately to suspend operations. Further, since
the Company does not have its own internal exploration staff, it is dependent on
outside consultants to find and evaluate exploration projects for it. As a
result, the Company must acquire its interests in projects from third parties,
often by paying a larger share of the costs of exploration than its revenue
share in the project.
WORKING CAPITAL; NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING. At September 30, 1996, the
Company had a working capital surplus of $176,000, which includes the entire
$1,475,000 owed by the Company under its bank credit facility with Bank One,
Texas (the "Credit Facility"). To date, the Company has satisfied substantially
all of its working capital needs through oil and gas revenues, the public and
private sale of common stock and debentures, the Company's Credit Facility and
other borrowings. While the Company currently has sufficient capital or cash
flow to meet all of its projected capital needs over the short-term, if Zydeco
or other operators were to propose an accelerated drilling schedules, Fortune
may not have sufficient capital or cash flow to participate at its existing
working interest level. Further, Fortune may not have sufficient capital to
pursue other attractive projects not currently contemplated which might be
presented to it. All of the Company's producing oil and gas properties are
pledged to secure the Credit Facility. At November 21, 1996, the total amount
owed in the Credit Facility was $1,325,000, and, due to past breaches in the
cash flow covenant, the Company is unable to borrow additional amounts under
such Credit Facility as of the date hereof. (See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations")
NET LOSSES INCURRED BY COMPANY. During its last three fiscal years, the
Company has incurred net losses. The losses equaled $3,654,000, $2,943,000 and
$6,214,000 for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively
(See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations"). The Company incurred a net loss of $2,180,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 1996 and may continue to incur losses in the future. In
addition, the Company expects to incur a non-cash expense in connection with the
Debentureholders acceptance of this Exchange Offer. (See "Capitalization") No
assurance can be given that the Company will be able to meet its working capital
needs out of its cash flow from operations. There can be no assurance that
Fortune can attain a sufficient level of revenues to fund such requirements or
that unbudgeted costs will not be incurred. Future events, including the
problems, delays, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by similarly
situated companies, as well as changes in economic, regulatory and competitive
conditions, may lead to cost increases that could make the Company's cash flow
from operations insufficient to fund capital requirements in the future. The
Company may require additional outside financing for the foreseeable future to
fund capital expenditures deemed desirable by management. No assurance can be
given that any such financing will be available on terms acceptable to the
Company, if at all. Additional financings may result in dilution for then
current stockholders. (See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations")
LIMITED SHORT-TERM IMPACT OF ZYDECO 3D VENTURE. The first well drilled on
one of the Zydeco Projects (the Aurora prospect) was plugged and abandoned in
January 1996 after the Company determined that the costs of completion made the
well uneconomic. Although not part of the Zydeco 3D Venture, the Company
participated with Zydeco in another well which encountered mechanical
difficulties before reaching its first objective and was temporarily plugged in
6
<PAGE>
August 1996. (See "Business and Properties - Exploration, Exploitation and
Development Activity - Zydeco 3D Venture.") It is anticipated that other wells
may be drilled on one or more of the Zydeco projects in the future, though no
assurance can be given that any wells will be drilled. Even if such wells are
drilled and are successful, it is extremely unlikely that Fortune would receive
any revenues from wells drilled on any of these projects until 1997, at the
earliest. Therefore, investors should be aware that the Zydeco 3D Venture will
not have any impact on the Company's revenues during 1996. No assurance can be
given that Fortune will ever receive any revenues from any of the Zydeco
projects.
NEED TO REPLACE RESERVES. Producing oil and gas reservoirs are, in general,
characterized by declining production rates. This decline rate depends on
reservoir characteristics, and varies from the steep decline rate characteristic
of the prolific reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico to the relatively slow decline
rate characteristic of the long-lived (but less prolific) fields on the
California properties which the Company previously owned. The Company's future
oil and natural gas reserves and production, and thus cash flow and income, are
highly dependent on the Company's ability to find or acquire additional
reserves. Without adding new reserves in the future, the Company's oil and gas
reserves and production will decline over the long term. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to find and develop or acquire
additional reserves. (See "Business and Properties - Oil and Gas Operations -
Oil and Gas Reserves")
INTENTION TO FARMOUT PROPERTIES. As described under "Business and Properties
- - Zydeco 3D Venture," the Company generally does not intend to retain a full 50%
working interest in any of the Zydeco Projects until it has adequate capital to
place at risk. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
farmout any portion of its interest in any of the Zydeco Projects. If the
Company is unable to farmout a portion of its interest, it must either retain
its 50% working interest, elect to not participate in the well or exercise its
"put" rights to Zydeco, if Zydeco is participating in the well. Further, Fortune
may not be the operator of any of such projects and will thus be dependent on
other oil and gas companies to conduct operations in a prudent and competent
manner. In such a situation, Fortune will have little or no control over the way
in which operations are conducted. If the entity selected to act as operator
proves incompetent, Fortune could be forced to incur additional costs to conduct
remedial procedures and could lose its investment in a property altogether.
PROPERTIES PLEDGED TO SECURE DEBT. All of the Company's producing
properties, are pledged to secure the Credit Facility. A failure to pay the
principal or interest or breaches of financial covenants under the Credit
Facility could cause the Company to lose all or part of its interest in its
principal producing properties currently pledged to secure the Credit Facility.
The entire principal balance of the Credit Facility is due July 1, 1997, and the
Company does not currently have the financial resources necessary to repay the
Credit Facility in full without curtailing its operations. The Company has
obtained extensions of the Credit Facility due date in the past. While
management intends to continue to seek extensions of the payment date for the
principal balance of the Credit Facility, no assurance can be given that Fortune
will be able to obtain any further extensions in the future. It is, therefore,
possible that Fortune's operating activities could be significantly curtailed
or, in the event that Fortune's financial position weakens significantly, that
substantially all of Fortune's productive properties could be seized by the Bank
through a foreclosure. (See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations")
FINANCIAL IMPAIRMENTS. The Company uses the successful efforts method of
accounting. In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of"
("SFAS 121"). SFAS 121 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 1995. The Company adopted SFAS 121 in the fourth quarter of 1995 and, as a
result, recorded a $2,530,000 impairment charge against 1995 operations. Because
of the uncertainty inherent in oil and gas prices, costs and reserves, the
Company may continue to experience impairment losses in the future.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY OFFICER. The Company depends to a large extent on the
abilities and continued participation of its key employee, Tyrone J. Fairbanks,
President and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of Mr. Fairbanks could have a
material adverse effect on the Company. In an effort to reduce the risk, the
Company has entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Fairbanks which
expires December 31, 1997. (See "Management") The Company has obtained $500,000
of key man life insurance on the life of Mr. Fairbanks.
7
<PAGE>
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY
RISKS RELATED TO CURRENT OIL AND GAS MARKETS. There is substantial
uncertainty as to the prices at which oil and gas produced by the Company may be
sold, and it is possible that if product prices decline to a low enough level,
the cost of operating some or all of the Company's properties may not be
economical. The availability of a ready market for oil and gas and the prices
obtained for such oil and gas depend upon numerous factors beyond the control of
the Company, including competition from other oil and gas suppliers, and
national and international economic and political developments. (See "Business
and Properties -- Oil and Gas Operations") The Company is not subject to any
natural gas price controls.
UNCERTAINTY OF ESTIMATES OF PROVED RESERVES AND FUTURE NET REVENUES. There
are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves
and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development
expenditures, including many factors beyond the control of the producer. The
reserve data set forth in this Prospectus represent only estimates. Estimating
quantities of proved reserves is inherently imprecise. Such estimates are based
upon certain assumptions about future production levels, future natural gas and
crude oil prices and future operating costs made using currently available
geologic engineering and economic data, some or all of which may prove to be
incorrect over time. As a result of changes in these assumptions that may occur
in the future, and based upon further production history, results of future
exploration and development, future gas and oil prices and other factors, the
quantity of proved reserves may be subject to upward or downward adjustment. In
addition, the estimates of future net revenues from proved reserves of the
Company and the present value thereof are based on certain assumptions about
future production levels, prices, and costs that may not prove to be correct
over time. The rate of production from oil and gas properties declines as
reserves are depleted. Except to the extent the Company acquires additional
properties containing proved reserves, conducts successful exploration and
development activities or, through engineering studies, identifies additional
behind-pipe zones or secondary recovery reserves, the proved reserves of the
Company will decline as reserves are produced. Future oil and gas production is,
therefore, highly dependent upon the Company's level of success in acquiring or
finding additional reserves. (See "Business and Properties - Oil and Gas
Operations - Oil and Gas Reserves")
VOLATILITY OF OIL AND GAS PRICES. Oil and gas prices have been and may be
expected to continue to be quite volatile. This volatility depends on numerous
factors, including steps taken by OPEC, tensions in the Middle East and weather
conditions. The average gas prices received by the Company were $2.28, $2.09 and
$1.77 per Mcf in 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively. The average oil prices
received by the Company were $14.33, $14.14 and $14.66 per Bbl in 1993, 1994 and
1995, respectively. At November 21, 1996, the Company was receiving an average
of approximately $2.70 per Mcf for its gas production and $21.50 per Bbl for its
oil production.
DRILLING RISKS. Drilling for oil and natural gas involves numerous risks,
including the risk that no commercially productive hydrocarbon reservoirs will
be encountered. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often
uncertain and drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a
result of a variety of factors, including unexpected drilling conditions,
equipment failures or accidents and adverse weather conditions. The Company's
future drilling activities may not be successful and if unsuccessful, such
failure will have an adverse effect on the Company's future results of
operations and financial condition.
OPERATING HAZARDS. The Company's operations are subject to all of the risks
normally incident to the operation and development of oil and gas properties and
the drilling of oil and gas wells, including encountering unexpected formations
or pressures, corrosive or hazardous substances, mechanical failure of
equipment, blowouts, cratering and fires, which could result in damage or injury
to, or destruction of, formations, producing facilities or other property or
could result in personal injuries, loss of life or pollution of the environment.
Any such event could result in substantial loss to the Company which could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition. In April 1996,
the Company experienced a mechanical failure of downhole equipment at the
Company's South Timbalier Block 76 well. As a result of this equipment failure,
the well was shut in from April 29, 1996 to July 6, 1996, and the Company
incurred significant costs to repair the problem. (See "Business and Properties
- - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity - South Timbalier Block 76") In addition,
because of the Company's strategy of acquiring interests in underdeveloped oil
and gas fields that have been operated by others for many years, the Company may
be liable for any damage or pollution caused by any prior operations on such oil
and gas fields. Although such operational risks and hazards may to some
8
<PAGE>
extent be minimized, no combination of experience, knowledge and scientific
evaluation can eliminate the risk of investment or assure a profit to any
company engaged in oil and gas operations.
UNINSURED RISKS. Under the terms of operating agreements entered into with
the operator of wells in which the Company has an interest, it is anticipated
that the operators will carry insurance against certain risks of oil and gas
operations. The Company would normally be required to pay its proportionate
share of the premiums for such insurance and be named as an additional insured
under the policy. However, the Company may not be fully insured against all
risks, either because such insurance is not available or because of premium
costs.
WEATHER HAZARDS. Weather conditions, including severe rains and winter
conditions, have adversely impacted the Company's oil and gas operations. Heavy
rains during the winter of 1995 washed out a road to the Company's Hopper
Canyon, California property, which required the producing wells on the property
to be shut in. Severe winter conditions on the San Juan Basin, New Mexico
property caused a curtailment of operations, including attempts to complete
wells which have been drilled. The inability to produce existing wells and to
complete wells which may yield commercial quantities of oil or gas has an
adverse impact on the Company's cash flow and financial condition. Furthermore,
weather conditions in the future, including hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico,
could interrupt or prevent production and drilling operations in the Gulf of
Mexico and the coastal counties and parishes, and could result in damage to
equipment or facilities.
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS. Oil and gas operations present risks of
environmental contamination from drilling operations and leakage from oil field
storage or transportation facilities. The Company has never experienced a
significant environmental mishap, but spills of oil could occur which could
create material liability to the Company for clean-up expenses. Environmental
contamination has occurred on the San Juan Basin, New Mexico property prior to
the Company's acquisition of its interest but has been cleaned up at no cost to
the Company. Although there can be no assurance of any third party recovery in
the event of a material liability, the Company generally seeks an indemnity from
the seller against claims for environmental hazards on properties acquired
through its acquisition program. In addition, the Company carries $2,000,000 of
environmental insurance with a $10,000 deductible to cover potential liability
for onshore environmental hazards and $1,000,000 coverage with a $25,000
deductible for offshore hazards. (See "Business and Properties - Governmental
Regulation")
COMPETITION. The oil and gas exploration, production and acquisition
business is highly competitive. A large number of companies and individuals
engage in acquiring properties or drilling for oil and gas, and there is a high
degree of competition for desirable oil and gas prospects and properties. There
is also competition between the oil and gas industries and other industries in
supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial, commercial,
residential and other consumers. Many of the Company's competitors have greater
financial and other resources than does the Company, and no assurance can be
given that the Company will be able to compete successfully in acquiring
desirable opportunities. (See "Business and Properties - Competition")
GOVERNMENT REGULATION. The Company's business is regulated by certain
federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the development,
production, marketing and transmission of oil and gas, as well as environmental
and safety matters. There is no assurance that laws and regulations enacted in
the future will not adversely affect the Company's exploration for or production
and marketing of oil and gas. From time to time, proposals are introduced in
Congress or by the Administration which could affect the Company's oil and gas
operations. (See "Business and Properties - Governmental Regulation")
SHORTAGES OF SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT. The Company's ability to conduct its
operations in a timely and cost effective manner is subject to the availability
of oil and gas operations equipment, supplies, and service crews. The industry
is currently experiencing a shortage of certain types of drilling rigs and work
boats in the Gulf of Mexico. This shortage could result in delays in the
Company's operations as well as higher operating and capital costs. Shortages of
other drilling equipment, tubular goods, drilling service crews and seismic
crews could occur from time to time further hindering the Company's ability to
conduct its operations as planned.
9
<PAGE>
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK
LOSS OF STATUS AS DEBT. Debentureholders who convert their Debentures into
shares of Common Stock and Exchange Warrants will no longer hold debt securities
of the Company. While the Debentures are unsecured, they do bear interest which
is paid semiannually and are due and payable December 31, 1997. No assurance can
be given that the Company will have the financial resources to repay the
Debentures at maturity, but in the event of a default, the Debentureholders have
the right to elect two directors to the Board of Directors of the Company. The
Common Stock does not afford similar rights to the Debentureholders once they
become stockholders of the Company. It is unlikely that the Company will pay
dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future, and there is no
obligation to redeem any of the Common Stock. Therefore, unless stockholders are
able to sell their shares of Common Stock on the AMEX or other market, they may
not be able to monetize their investment.
HOLDING PERIOD ON EXCHANGE STOCK. Debentureholders who exchange their
Debentures for shares of Common Stock will be required to hold such shares for a
period of at least 90 days following the Closing Date. During this period, the
former Debentureholders will not be able to take advantage of increases in the
market price of the Common Stock or protect themselves against a decline in
market value. While the price of the Common Stock has not been highly volatile
during the second half of 1996, it has historically fluctuated in value by a
significant percentage over a quarterly period. (See "Price range of Common
Stock") As a result of the required holding period, exchanging Debentureholders
may not be able to realize the same value upon a disposition of their shares
that existed at the time of the exchange.
NO PROCEEDS TO FORTUNE. Fortune will not receive any proceeds from this
offering, though it will be relieved of long term debt. Nevertheless, the
Company will be required to pay all expenses of the offering estimated to be
$62,000. If the Company receives any proceeds from the exercise of the Exchange
Warrants, it will retain such proceeds irrespective of the amount raised.
MARKET PRICE VOLATILITY. The market price of the Common Stock and the
Company's warrants may be subject to significant fluctuations in response to
drilling results and the financial results of operations. Developments affecting
the oil and gas industry generally, including national and international
economic conditions and government regulation, could also have a significant
impact on the market price of the Common Stock and warrants. In addition, the
stock market in recent years has experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of companies, and the price of the Common Stock and warrants could
be affected by such fluctuations.
SECURITIES MARKET FACTORS. The markets for equity securities have been
volatile and the price of the Company's Common Stock has in the past been, and
could in the future be, subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarter to
quarter variations in operating results, news announcements, trading volume,
general market trends and other factors. There can be no assurance that the
Common Stock exchanged in this offering will trade in the future at market
prices in excess of the conversion price of this offering.
ABSENCE OF DIVIDENDS. The Company has not paid dividends since its
inception, and it does not anticipate paying dividends on its Common Stock in
the foreseeable future. Under the Credit Facility, the Company may not pay
dividends on its capital stock without the prior written consent of the bank. In
addition, the Indenture under which the Company's outstanding Debentures were
issued restricts the payment of dividends. (See "Dividend Policy," "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
"Description of Securities - Common Stock")
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE. Sales of substantial amounts of the Common
Stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price of the
Company's Common Stock. At October 31, 1996, the Company had outstanding options
and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,111,368 shares of Common Stock which
are currently exercisable. At that date, there were 11,431,663 shares of Common
Stock outstanding, of which 10,824,898 shares are freely tradeable and 606,765
shares are restricted from sale under Rule 144 adopted by the Commission under
the Act. In conjunction with this Exchange Offer, the Company will have up to
493,350 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Company's
Debentures and up to 500,250 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
the Exchange Warrants and Co-Conversion Agent warrants.
In connection with the Company's acquisition of its interest in the Zydeco
3D Venture, Fortune issued, to the stockholders of LEX, 1,200,000 shares of
Common Stock and 1,200,000 five year stock purchase warrants exercisable at
$4.75 per share. Pursuant to a court order, Fortune has placed in escrow 400,000
of such shares of Common Stock and 400,000 of such warrants until a dispute over
the ownership of LEX is resolved. (See "Business and Properties - Legal
Proceedings")
10
<PAGE>
"RESET" SHARES. In connection with the acquisition of the South Timbalier
Block 76, the Company issued shares in a Regulation S offering. The shares were
sold subject to "reset" provisions which required the Company to issue
additional shares if the market price of the Common Stock declined during
certain recalculation periods. The price did decline in the first quarter of
1996, and the purchasers have demanded the issuance of an additional 1,266,000
shares. The Company has declined to issue such shares pending completion of an
investigation into whether the price decline was a result of market
manipulation. Three of the purchasers have filed suit to require the issuance of
such shares. (See "Business and Properties - Acquisition and Divestiture
Activity - South Timbalier Block 76 Acquisition" and "- Legal Proceedings")
"PUBLIC" WARRANTS. So long as the publicly-traded Common Stock Purchase
Warrants of the Company (the "Public Warrants") remain outstanding, the exercise
price and number of shares to be acquired upon exercise of such warrants are
subject to adjustment in the event the Company issues shares of Common Stock at
below the current market price. Such an adjustment occurred in connection with
the Company's June, 1995 public offering and could occur if the Company is
required to issue the "reset" shares related to the December 1995 acquisition of
the South Timbalier Block. (See "Business and Properties - Acquisition and
Divestiture Activity-South Timbalier Block 76 Acquisition" and "- Pending
Litigation")
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS. Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of
control of the Company. Section 203 prevents an "interested stockholder"
(generally, any person owning 15% or more of a corporation's outstanding voting
stock) from engaging in a "business combination" (as defined) for three years
following the date such person became an interested stockholder unless certain
exceptions are met. In addition, the Company has a substantial amount of
authorized but unissued Common Stock and preferred stock. The Commission has
indicated that the use of authorized but unissued shares of voting stock,
including both common stock and preferred stock the terms of which may be
established by the board of directors, could have an anti-takeover effect. (See
"Description of Securities - Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions")
USE OF PROCEEDS
The Company will be relieved of outstanding long term debt of $1,380,000 if
the minimum of 80% of the Debentures is converted and $1,725,000 if all of the
Debentures are converted. The Company will not receive any proceeds from such
conversion, however; and it will still be obligated to pay the expenses of this
offering, estimated to be $62,000, whether or not this Exchange Offer is
successful. In the Exchange Offer, the Company will issue up to 431,250 Exchange
Warrants. If all such Warrants were exercised, the net proceeds to the Company
would be $1,940,625. No assurance can be given that the Company will receive any
proceeds from the exercise of Exchange Warrants. To the extent the Company
receives any such proceeds, they will be used to provide working capital and pay
exploration, development and acquisition costs on future projects, but the
Company has not identified any specific expenses which will be paid. Pending
application of any such proceeds, the Company would make temporary investments
in interest-bearing savings accounts, certificates of deposit, U.S. government
obligations, money market accounts or other short-term, interest-bearing
securities.
DILUTION
The net tangible book value of the Company at September 30, 1996, was
$12,142,000 or $1.06 per share of Common Stock. Net tangible book value per
share represents the amount of the Company's total tangible assets less total
liabilities, divided by the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding.
Assuming conversion of all of the Debentures, the net tangible book value of the
Company at September 30, 1996, would have been $13,822,000 or $1.16 per share of
Common Stock. (See "Exchange Offer") This represents an increase in net tangible
book value to existing stockholders and a substantial dilution to new investors
acquiring Common Stock through the conversion of their Debentures.
11
<PAGE>
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Company as of
September 30, 1996, and as adjusted to reflect the conversion of the Debentures
to Common Stock. No assurance can be given that any of the Debentures will be
converted, although this Exchange Offer will not close unless at least 80% in
principal amount of the Debentures are converted. If the Exchange Offer is
completed, the Company will incur a non-cash debt conversion expense for the
difference between the fair market value of all of the Common Stock, Exchange
Warrants and Co-Conversion Agent warrants issued in connection with the Exchange
Offer and the fair market value of the lower number of Common Stock that could
have been issued upon the conversion of the Debentures under the Indenture prior
to the Exchange offer. The Company has estimated the debt conversion expense to
be $792,000, assuming conversion of all of the Debentures and using a market
price for its Common Stock of $3-3/16 per share. The "As Adjusted" columns in
the following table reflects the effect of recording this estimated non-cash
debt conversion expense. The table should be read in conjunction with the
Financial Statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this
Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
--------------------------------------------
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED(1)
----------------------------
80% CONVERSION 100% CONVERSION
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current liabilities (including current portion of
long term debt) .................................. $ 1,842,000 $ 1,842,000 $ 1,842,000
============ ============ ============
Long-term debt (excluding current portion) ......... $ 1,680,000 $ 336,000 $ --
------------ ------------ ------------
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 2,000,000
shares authorized, none outstanding
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000
shares authorized, 11,431,664 shares outstanding
before Debenture Conversion, 11,826,344 shares $ 114,000 $ 118,000 $ 119,000
outstanding after 80% Debenture Conversion and
11,925,014 shares oustanding after 100%
Debenture Conversion
Additional paid-in capital ......................... $ 28,101,000 $ 30,023,000 $ 30,503,000
Accumulated deficit ................................ $(16,008,000) $(16,642,000) $(16,800,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net stockholders' equity ........................... $ 12,207,000 $ 13,499,000 $ 13,822,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total capitalization ............................... $ 13,887,000 $ 13,835,000 $ 13,822,000
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
- ----------------
(1) Assumes conversion of Debentures but not the exercise of any Exchange
Warrants or Co-Conversion Agent warrants.
12
<PAGE>
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Company has not paid dividends since its inception, and it does not
anticipate paying any dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future.
Under the Company's line of credit, the Company may not pay dividends on its
capital stock without the prior written consent of the bank. The Indenture under
which the Company's outstanding Debentures were issued restricts the payment of
dividends in the event the Company is in default on the Debentures; and Delaware
law prevents the payment of dividends unless the Company meets certain financial
tests. (See "Description of Securities - Common and Preferred Stock" and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources")
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The Company's Common Stock is listed and traded on the AMEX. Trading in the
Company's Public Warrants on the AMEX began on April 18, 1994. The following
table sets forth the high and the low quarterly closing prices of the Common
Stock and Public Warrants on the AMEX for the periods indicated.
COMMON STOCK WARRANTS
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
---------- --------- --------- -------
1996
Fourth Quarter (through
November 22, 1996) .......... $3-1/2 $2-1/4 $1-3/4 $ 1
Third Quarter ............... 3-11/16 2-1/4 2-3/8 1-1/4
Second Quarter .............. 4 2-5/8 3 1-3/8
First Quarter ............... 5 2 3-3/16 1-3/8
1995
Fourth Quarter .............. 4-15/16 3-3/8 3-7/16 1-7/8
Third Quarter ............... 3-15/16 2-5/8 2-1/2 1-1/2
Second Quarter .............. 3-5/16 1-5/6 1 1/4
First Quarter ............... 2-1/2 1-3/4 7/8 1/2
1994
Fourth Quarter .............. 3-9/16 1-7/8 1-11/16 7/16
Third Quarter ............... 3-1/4 2 3/4 5/16
Second Quarter .............. 2-3/8 1-3/8 5/8 3/16
First Quarter ............... 2-11/16 2-1/8
At November 22, 1996, the closing price of the Common Stock was $3-3/16
per share. At October 31, 1996, there were 11,431,663 shares of the Company's
Common Stock outstanding held of record by approximately 1,500 stockholders.
13
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ IN CONNECTION WITH THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, RELATED NOTES AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED
ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROSPECTUS.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT OPERATING RESULTS
The statements contained in this Report on Form 10-QSB that are not purely
historical are forward looking statements within the meaning on Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, including statements regarding the Company's expectations, hopes,
intentions or strategies regarding the future. Forward looking statements
include statements regarding: future oil and gas production and prices, future
exploration and development spending, future drilling and operating plans,
reserve and production potential of the Company's properties and prospects and
the Company's business strategy. All forward looking statements included in this
document are based on information available to the Company on the date hereof,
and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward looking
statements. It is important to note that the Company's actual results could
differ materially from those in such forward looking statements. Some of the
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are set forth
below.
The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience,
fluctuations in its results of operations. (See "Risk Factors - Risks Associated
with the Company" and "- Risks Associated with the Oil and Gas Industry" for a
discussion of the factors that affect the Company's results of operations) As a
result of the foregoing or other factors, there can be no assurance that the
Company will not experience material fluctuations in future operating results on
a quarterly or annual basis, which would materially and adversely affect the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fortune's primary focus is domestic exploration for, and development of, oil
and natural gas. The Company expects in the future to make use of advanced 3D
and 2D seismic technology in exploring for reserves in the Gulf Coast. Prior to
June 1994, Fortune had been an oil and gas acquisition and development company
seeking to acquire proved reserves and development opportunities on proven
properties. Fortune encountered losses during the past three years, some of
which were generated by conditions such as commodity price induced impairments
and key non-operated wells which had production curtailed to meet government
maximum field allowable levels. The Company initiated the change from an
acquisition based, to an advanced technology exploration based, plan of
operation to attempt to reduce potential finding costs of oil and gas reserves
to an amount which is less than the cost per BOE to acquire them. To help
facilitate its exploration strategy and focus its efforts, the Company recently
sold all of its California producing properties and prospects. (See "Business
and Properties - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity - Divestiture of
California Properties") The Company also relocated its headquarters to Houston,
Texas in February 1996. There can be no assurance that such a strategy will be
effective.
REVENUES AND PRODUCTION
Over the three years ended December 31, 1995, the Company increased its
revenues by 13%, to $3,193,000 from $2,834,000.
During the three years ended December 31, 1995, Fortune's production of
crude oil increased 17% despite the Company's emphasis on acquiring gas
reserves. Natural gas production grew for the same three year period 26% to
909,000 Mcf from 724,000 Mcf.
14
<PAGE>
DIRECT PRODUCTION EXPENSES PER BOE
Over the three years ended December 31, 1995, the direct production expense
per equivalent barrel increased by 29% to $6.22 per BOE from $4.84 per BOE
primarily as a result of significant storm damage and related repairs in 1995 at
one of the California properties which the Company has since sold.
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND 1995
During the nine months ended September 30, 1996, Fortune had a net loss of
$2,180,000 compared to a net loss of $1,614,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 1995. The increase in loss in 1996 is primarily attributable to
increased exploration and dryhole expenses.
Net revenues from sales of oil and gas increased by $800,000 (39%) in the
nine months ended September 30, 1996, compared to the same 1995 period. The
increase resulted primarily from higher natural gas prices, production from the
South Timbalier Block 76 which was acquired in December 1995 and low 1995
production resulting from shutting in the Company's Hopper Canyon oil field for
5-1/2 months due to storm damage. Revenues for 1996 increased despite a two
month shut down of the Company's South Timbalier Block 76 well in the second
quarter of 1996 due to a mechanical failure and the sale of all the Company's
California properties in the first and second quarters of 1996. The South
Timbalier Block 76 well was shut in on April 29, 1996, and came back on
production on July 6, 1996, flowing at approximately 16 million cubic feet per
day of gas and 1,100 barrels of condensate per day. Fortune has a 9.375% net
revenue interest in the well, which comprises about 50% of the Company's oil and
gas revenues. The Company incurred approximately $300,000 in workover costs to
repair the problem, most of which was expensed as production and operating
expense in June and July 1996.
Natural gas prices on the Company's production averaged $2.49 per MCF for
the nine months ended September 30, 1996 as compared to $1.54 per MCF for the
same 1995 period. Oil prices averaged $19.61 per barrel compared to $14.69 per
barrel for the nine month period ended September 30, 1995.
In the three months and nine months ended September 30, 1996 other income
consisted primarily of interest income.
Production and operating expenses decreased by $37,000 (4%) in the nine
months ended September 30, 1996 compared to the same 1995 period despite the
expense of the South Timbalier workover discussed above. The decrease results
primarily from the Company's sale of the California properties in early 1996.
Exploration expense is comprised primarily of geological and geophysical
costs, delay rentals and abandoned leasehold costs. During the nine months ended
September 30, 1996, Fortune incurred exploration expenses of $825,000 compared
to $383,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 1995. The 1996 increase is
primarily attributable to the Company's $385,000 write-off of its leasehold cost
basis in the Cruiser prospect in the third quarter of 1996 in connection with
its decision not to pay the delay rental on the major lease in the prospect. The
Company also expensed $722,000 in dry hole costs in the third quarter of 1996,
primarily in connection with plugging the exploratory wells on the Lirette and
DABM prospects. On June 6, 1996, the Company announced successful production
test results from the Schwing #1 field discovery well at East Bayou Sorrel,
Iberville Parish, Louisiana.. During the production test, the well flowed at a
sustained rate of 1,026 Bbls of oil per day and 980 Mmcf of gas per day with a
flowing tubing pressure of 6,670 PSI on as 8/64 inch choke from a perforated
interval of 13,208 to 13,226 feet. The well is expected to commence production
during December 1996. The Company has an 11.4% non-operated working interest in
this well before payout.
In the nine months ended September 30, 1996, Fortune's general and
administrative expenses increased by $563,000 (66%) over the same 1995 period.
The increase was due primarily to increased legal fees resulting from the
Regulation S shareholder litigation, increased acquisition and disposition
activity, increased shareholder reporting expense and increased personnel
expense. The Company also incurred non-recurring office relocation and severance
cost of $207,000 in the first nine months of 1996 in connection with the
Company's move to Houston. Interest expense decreased by $195,000 (37%) for the
nine months ended September 30, 1996 over the same 1995 period due to the lower
debt balance. The lower depletable property balance, resulting from the year-end
1995 impairment write-off, led to a
15
<PAGE>
decrease in the Company's provision for depletion, depreciation and amortization
of $155,000 (16%) in the nine months ended September 30, 1996 as compared to
1995. YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994
During the year ended December 31, 1995 Fortune had a net loss of
$6,214,000, compared to a net loss of $2,943,000 for the year ended December 31,
1994. The loss for the period ended December 31, 1995 was primarily due to a
$2,530,000 impairment charge attributable to the Company's early adoption of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 121 (Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets) and $1,472,000 of exploration expenses,
including geological and geophysical, dry hole and abandoned leasehold cost.
Net revenues from sales of oil and gas decreased $380,000 (11%) in the year
ended December 31, 1995, compared to the same 1994 period. The decrease resulted
primarily from lower natural gas prices combined with shutting in the Company's
Hopper Canyon oil field for 5-1/2 months due to a storm damaged access road.
Natural gas prices averaged $1.77 for the year ended December 31, 1995, compared
to $2.09 for 1994. Oil prices averaged $14.66 per barrel for the year ended
December 31, 1995 as compared to $14.14 per barrel for the year ended December
31, 1994.
Other income consisted primarily of interest income, operator's overhead fee
revenues being charged on joint owned wells and a prospect fee of $50,000 paid
to the Company when it farmed out its 50% interest in its Polaris Prospect
offshore Louisiana.
Direct production expenses increased during 1995 by $424,000 (39%) compared
to 1994. The increase is due primarily to the additional operating expense from
the acquired production in Rio Arriba, New Mexico, Refugio County, Texas and
offshore Louisiana; additional wells brought on production in New Mexico and
Refugio County, Texas; and additional expenses incurred in Hopper Canyon Field,
for repairs due to storm damage.
During 1995, Fortune's general and administrative expenses increased by
$192,000 (19%), over 1994. The increase was due primarily to increased insurance
costs, legal fees, public relations expenses, shareholder expense and expense to
relocate the Company's headquarters. Interest expense increased by $410,000
(89%) for the year ended December 31, 1995, due to increased interest bearing
debt from the Refugio County, Texas and Rio Arriba County, New Mexico
acquisitions. The Company's provision for depletion, depreciation and
amortization decreased by $261,000 (13%) in the year ended December 31, 1995,
compared to the same 1994 period due to the effect of the prior year impairment
write-off.
The Company incurred $418,000 in geological and geophysical costs in 1995
vs. none in 1994. Dry hole costs increased $803,000 over 1994 due primarily to
incurring $799,000 in dry hole cost on the Aurora well offshore Louisiana.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND 1993
During the year ended December 31, 1994 Fortune had a net loss of
$2,943,000, compared to a net loss of $3,654,000 for the year ended December 31,
1993. The loss for the period ended December 31, 1994 was primarily due to
higher depletion expense, lower natural gas prices received by the Company
during the period and higher lease operating costs attributed to the properties
acquired earlier this year. The loss for the year ended December 31, 1994 period
also includes a $1,031,000 impairment against oil and gas reserves, a one time
charge of $225,000 for a severance package, to be paid over a two year period,
to Daniel E. Pasquini, the Company's former president who resigned on June 23,
1994, and a $315,000 charge for the Company's interest in a Webb County, Texas,
exploration project. The $315,000 Webb County loss consisted of $115,000 in dry
hole costs and a $200,000 non-cash impairment which was included in abandoned
leasehold expense.
Net revenues from sales of oil and gas increased $577,000 (21%) in the year
ended December 31, 1994, compared to the same 1993 period. The increase resulted
primarily from production from wells acquired and recompletion activities at the
La Rosa Field. Oil prices the Company received averaged $14.14 per barrel for
the year ended December 31, 1994 as compared to $14.33 per barrel for the year
ended December 31, 1993. Gas prices averaged $2.09 per Mcf for the period ended
December 31, 1994 as compared to $2.28 for the year ended December 31, 1993.
Also, in the year ended December 31, 1994 other income consisted primarily of
operator overhead fee revenues being charged on joint owned wells.
Direct production expenses increased by $144,000 (15%) in the year ended
December 31, 1994, compared to 1993. The increase was primarily due to the
increase in direct operating expense from the acquired production and additional
16
<PAGE>
wells put on production as a result of recompletions and facility installations
in Refugio County, Texas and Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, net of expense
reductions in California operations due to improved operating methods and lower
electrical costs.
During 1994, Fortune's general and administrative expenses increased by
$229,000 (29%), over 1993 general and administrative expenses. The increase was
due primarily to increased insurance costs, legal fees, public relations
expenses, stockholder expense and expense attributed to a failed merger attempt
during the year. Interest expense increased by $149,000 (48%) for the year ended
December 31, 1994, due to increased interest bearing debt from the Refugio
County, Texas and Rio Arriba County, New Mexico acquisitions. The Company's
provision for depletion, depreciation and amortization increased by $351,000
(20%) in the year ended December 31, 1994, compared to the same 1993 period
because of depletion related to the additional acquired oil and gas properties
and lower gas prices at year end. During 1994, the Company also had an
impairment against its oil and gas assets as a charge against earnings and
abandoned leasehold costs totaling $1,280,000 on the Company's oil and gas
properties.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Fortune's operating cash flow increased for the nine months ended
September 30, 1996 to $418,000 as compared to an operating cash flow deficit of
$(458,000) for the same 1995 period. This increase in cash flow was a result of
higher natural gas prices and higher gas production in 1996 as discussed above.
Shutting in the South Timbalier Block 76 well and the resulting workover had a
significant adverse effect on cash flow in the second quarter of 1996.
On June 30, 1995, the Company closed an underwriting of 4,100,000 shares of
Common Stock at a price of $2.00 per share. On July 5, 1995, the underwriters
exercised their overallotment option for an additional 500,000 shares. The
Company netted approximately $8.1 million after deduction of underwriting
discounts and costs of the offering. On December 11, 1995, the Company closed a
private placement of 1,321,117 shares to acquire a producing property and raise
additional capital. From this sale, the Company netted approximately $3.3
million after payment of expenses of the offering. (See "Description of Business
- - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity - South Timbalier Block 76")
Fortune's operating cash flow decreased during 1995 to a $(1,112,000)
deficit or (326%) as compared to 1994. This decrease in cash flow was primarily
the result of the effect of lower natural gas prices, the shutting-in of the
Company's Hopper Canyon Field, higher operating costs and the occurrence of
geological and geophysical expenses in 1995.
Fortune's internal liquidity and capital resources in the near term will
consist primarily of working capital derived from its oil and gas operations.
These items comprise all of Fortune's liquid assets. Fortune's working capital
increased during 1995 due to the cash infusions from the 1995 stock offerings
and the anticipated 1996 sales of the California properties. The proceeds from
the sale of the California properties were used to pay down the Bank One Credit
Facility after year end. The Company's working capital decreased during the nine
month period ended September 30, 1996, as the Company used working capital to
fund its exploratory drilling.
On January 14, 1994, the Company entered into a $10 million secured master
revolving credit facility with Bank One, Texas, N.A. The facility expires, if
not further renewed or extended, on July 1, 1997. The amount the Company may
borrow under the Credit Facility is determined by the borrowing base as
calculated by the Bank semi-annually on the basis of the Company's oil and gas
reserves. The principal balance of the Credit Facility at September 30, 1996 was
$1,475,000. The Credit Facility is secured by a mortgage on all of the Company's
existing producing oil and gas properties and currently requires monthly
principal payments of $75,000. Under the terms of the facility, the Company is
subject to certain covenants, including restrictions or requirements with
respect to working capital, tangible net worth, net cash flow, additional debt,
asset sales and certain mergers. During February 1996, the Company made a
principal reduction of $1,100,000, primarily from the proceeds of the sale of
its California properties. At December 31, 1995, the Company was not in
compliance with its cash flow coverage ratio covenant in the credit agreement.
Under the terms of the credit agreement, the bank has the right to demand
repayment of the entire loan balance in the event of covenant defaults. The
Company obtained a waiver of this covenant from the bank as of December 31,
1995. The Company has determined that it was in compliance with the cash flow
coverage ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 1996; however, because of the
past breaches in the cash flow covenant, the Company is not able to borrow any
additional amounts under the Credit Facility at this time. The Credit Facility
is due July 1, 1997, at which date the loan balance would be $800,000 after
payment of the required monthly principal reductions. Prior to that date, the
Company expects its borrowing base, which should increase as a result of
commencing production at East Bayou Sorrel, will be sufficient to allow the
Company to extend the term of its Credit Facility. The Company has not received
a commitment to extend the term of the Credit Facility and there can be no
assurance that the term will be extended. However, the Company
17
<PAGE>
believes that it will have the financial resources, as discussed herein, to
restructure or repay the Credit Facility if necessary. (See "Risk Factors -
Working Capital; Need for Additional Financing" and " - Properties Pledged to
Secure Debt")
On April 24, 1995, in connection with the Bank One agreement to waive
certain covenant breaches, Bank One required the Company to enter into a lock
box arrangement pursuant to which its revenues are paid to an account with Bank
One. Bank One instituted the lock box arrangement to monitor the Company's
revenues until such time the Company could demonstrate it could consistently
meet the terms of the principal covenants. There is no limitation placed on any
funds subject to the lock box arrangement.
Capital expenditures, including expenditures for property acquisition and
drilling and completion costs, for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and
1993 were $4,415,000, $4,065,000 and $6,750,000, respectively. The increase in
capital expenditures for 1995 was principally attributable to capital expended
to acquire, explore and develop the Company's acquired interests offshore
Louisiana, New Mexico and Refugio County, Texas. The higher 1993 capital
expenditures are attributable to the Company's acquisition of properties from
Michael Petroleum, et al. in October 1993. Expenditures for oil and gas
properties, including property acquisitions, dryhole costs and exploration
expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 were $2,253,000 as
compared to $2,292,000 for the same 1995 period.
Fortune's capital expenditures for the remainder of 1996 are currently
estimated to be approximately $500,000 for its exploration and development
activities. The Company intends to provide for these expenditures with its
available cash and either the exercise of outstanding warrants, as described
herein, the recovery of prospect costs advanced by the Company, or a private
placement of debt or equity. Should such funds not be available to the Company
as required for timely drilling, the Company can reduce its working interest
participation in the wells, farm-out additional interest or put its interest
back to Zydeco for an overriding royalty and after payout working interest.
Should the Company's working interest in exploration projects be reduced, the
Company would not derive as great a benefit as it may have otherwise enjoyed in
the event of an exploration success.
Conditions outside of Fortune's control influence the price Fortune receives
for its oil and gas production. As of November 21, 1996, the Company was
receiving approximately $21.50 per barrel as an average price for its oil
production and $2.70 per MCF as an average price for its gas production. At
December 31, 1995, the Company was receiving an average of $2.32 per Mcf for its
gas production and $16.10 per Bbl. for its oil production. At December 31, 1994,
the Company was receiving approximately $14.62 per barrel as an average price
for its produced oil and $1.39 per Mcf as an average price for its produced gas.
The Company's December 31, 1995 oil and gas reserve report prepared by
Huddleston & Co. Inc., of Houston, Texas, its independent engineers, indicated a
net present value discounted at ten percent of the Company's proved reserves
equal to $8.9 million at December 31, 1995, compared to a $8.1 million
discounted value at December 31, 1994. Of that total value, the proved developed
producing wells had a discounted value of $6.7 million at December 31, 1995
compared to $5.7 million at December 31, 1994. Total net proved recoverable
reserves at December 31, 1995 decreased to 347,000 barrels of oil and 5.9
billion cubic feet of natural gas from 1,647,000 barrels of oil and 5.9 billion
cubic feet of natural gas at December 31, 1994. The decrease in proved oil
reserves was primarily attributable to reclassifying to oil and gas properties
held for sale, the Company's California properties which were sold in February
1996.
If all of the Debentures are converted into shares of Common Stock, the
Company will be relieved of interest expense totaling $182,000 per year. As a
result, Fortune will experience an increase in cash flow as a result of the
closing of this Exchange Offer.
The Company follows the intrinsic value method for stock options granted to
employees. In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." The Company does not intend to adopt, for accounting purposes,
the fair value method for stock-based compensation plans, which is an optional
provision of Accounting Standard 123.
18
<PAGE>
BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
GENERAL
Fortune is an independent public oil and natural gas company whose primary
focus is on exploration for and development of domestic oil and natural gas
properties. The Company's principal properties are located onshore and offshore
Louisiana and onshore Texas.
During 1995, the Company implemented a program of exploration for
significant oil and natural gas reserves using state-of-the-art 3D seismic and
CAEX technology. The Company believes that the use of 3D seismic and CAEX
technology provides more accurate and comprehensive geological data for
evaluation of drilling prospects than traditional 2D evaluation methods. In
furtherance of this exploration program, in February 1995, Fortune formed a
strategic alliance with Zydeco (the "Zydeco 3D Venture") and has since acquired
an interest in over 20 exploration projects (the "Zydeco Projects") in the
shallow Gulf Coast waters of Louisiana. Since late 1995, the Company has also
acquired, with other industry partners, interests in additional prospects in the
Louisiana Gulf Coast and is continually evaluating other 3D and 2D exploration
projects.
The Company also seeks to take advantage of attractive acquisition targets
which will enable it to acquire reserves at an attractive price. In furtherance
of that objective, on December 11, 1995, the Company purchased an interest in a
producing oil and gas property located in the Gulf of Mexico offshore Louisiana
for cash. (See "Exploration, Exploitation and Development Activity - Zydeco 3D
Venture" and "Acquisition and Divestiture Activity - South Timbalier Block 76
Acquisition")
The Company's principal executive offices are currently located at 515 West
Greens Road, Suite 720, Houston, Texas 77067. Its telephone number at that
address is (281) 872-1170.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Company seeks to add reserves in the most cost efficient and effective
manner. The Company previously focused its efforts on the acquisition of
producing properties in an effort to take advantage of what it believed to be
competitive prices for proved reserves with development potential in relation to
the cost of reserves discovered through exploration activities. (See "
Acquisition and Divestiture Activity") In mid-1994, the Company made a strategic
decision to shift its emphasis away from the acquisition of producing properties
to exploration for oil and natural gas reserves. This decision was prompted by
increasing price competition for attractive producing properties (caused by
larger and better capitalized companies moving into the acquisition market) and
a general tightening in available financing for acquisitions.
The Company's decision to shift its emphasis to exploration was further
influenced by several factors which Fortune believes create new opportunities
for exploration. These factors include increased availability of 3D seismic and
CAEX technology at competitive prices and the reallocation of exploration
budgets by major oil companies from domestic activity to international
exploration. This move by the major oil companies resulted in increased access
to geological and geophysical information relating to potential prospects, new
opportunities to enter into farmout agreements with respect to prospects held by
the major oil companies and less demand and price competition for domestic
acreage. To help facilitate its exploration strategy and focus its efforts, the
Company recently sold all of its California producing properties and prospects.
(See "Business and Properties - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity -
Divestiture of California Properties") The Company relocated its headquarters to
the greater Houston, Texas area in February 1996.
The Company would expect to continue to review acquisition opportunities
which may be presented to it and to conclude acquisitions which further its
business objectives. Of course, no assurance can be given that any such
opportunities will present themselves or that the Company will be able to
conclude any transactions if they arise. The Company is not now in discussions
with any other party regarding and has no arrangements or agreements respecting
any potential acquisition.
19
<PAGE>
EXPLORATION, EXPLOITATION AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
The Company is involved in a number of exploration and exploitation
projects, including onshore Louisiana, the Zydeco 3D Venture projects and
projects in the San Juan Basin, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico and La Rosa Field,
Refugio County, Texas. Additionally, Zydeco is continuing its work to identify
other potential projects for the Zydeco 3D Venture.
EAST BAYOU SORREL FIELD, IBERVILLE PARISH, LOUISIANA
On June 6, 1996, the Company announced successful production test results
from the Schwing #1 field discovery well at East Bayou Sorrel, Iberville Parish,
Louisiana. During the production test, the well flowed at a sustained rate of
1,026 Bbls of oil per day and 980 Mmcf of gas per day with a flowing tubing
pressure of 6,670 PSI on a 8/64 inch choke from a perforated interval of 13,208
to 13,226 feet. The well is expected to commence production during the fourth
quarter of 1996. The Company has an 11.4% non-operated working interest in this
well before payout.
LIRETTE PROSPECT, LAFOURCHE PARISH, LOUISIANA
In August 1996, the initial exploratory well on the Lirette prospect in
Lafourche Parish, Louisiana was plugged and abandoned as a dry hole. The Company
had a 10% non-operating working interest in the Lirette well. The Company's cost
of acquiring this property and drilling this well of approximately $260,000 was
expensed as dryhole costs in the third quarter of 1996.
SOUTH LAKE ARTHUR, JEFFERSON DAVIS PARISH, LOUISIANA
In June 1996, the Company acquired a 12.5% non operating working interest in
the South Lake Arthur prospect in Vermilian Parish, Louisiana. The Company
expects to spud an exploratory well on this prospect before the end of 1996.
ZYDECO 3D VENTURE
On May 12, 1995, Fortune acquired Lagniappe Exploration, Inc. ("LEX") which
had previously entered into an exploration agreement with Zydeco. As a result,
Fortune acquired LEX's right to participate in the Zydeco 3D Venture. Fortune
paid the LEX stockholders an aggregate of 1,200,000 shares of Common Stock and
1,200,000 five year stock purchase warrants exercisable at $4.75 per share. A
portion of such shares and warrants remain in escrow pending the resolution of a
dispute which has arisen among the former LEX stockholders and others regarding
who is entitled to the shares of Common Stock and stock purchase warrants issued
by Fortune at the closing of the LEX acquisition. (See "- Legal Proceedings")
The only material asset of LEX was its right to participate in the Zydeco 3D
Venture. Under the exploration agreement with Zydeco, Fortune has acquired a 50%
interest in over 20 seismically defined oil and gas projects identified by
Zydeco using advanced 3D seismic imaging, visualization and comprehensive well
log analyses in exchange for funding a budget of $4,800,000 for leasehold
acquisition and seismic costs. These projects are in various stages of
evaluation and leasehold acquisition. The Company expects that wells will be
drilled on several of the projects before the end of 1998, but no assurance can
be given when, or if, any such wells will be drilled. These projects are
primarily located in geological trends in the "Transition Zone" and the
"Timbalier Trench" areas of the Gulf Coast of Louisiana, where there have been
discoveries of crude oil and natural gas reserves and where the Company
considers advanced 3D seismic and CAEX technology to be effective in better
defining exploration risks. The Company and Zydeco have established areas of
mutual interest ("AMI's") adjoining each prospect and Zydeco has agreed to
provide Fortune with a right of first refusal on any new projects developed by
Zydeco along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana until December 31, 1996. The advantage
to Fortune of the establishment of the AMI's and right of first refusal is that
as Zydeco determines new projects within the AMI's, Fortune will have the right
to participate in them, though no assurance can be given that any new projects
will be identified or that Fortune will have the financial resources to
participate in such projects if any are identified. (See "Risk Factors")
The Company does not currently expect to retain a working interest of more
than 25%, except in certain circumstances, in each well drilled on the Zydeco
Projects and intends to "farmout" its remaining interest to other oil companies
on a "promoted" basis. Fortune may retain larger or smaller working interests in
certain projects depending
20
<PAGE>
upon capital availability and other factors. Under a farmout arrangement, the
Company would be relieved of its obligation to pay, or could recover already
paid, acquisition and exploration costs but would wind up with a smaller
interest in any given prospect. No assurance can be given that Fortune will be
able to farmout any of the projects on a promoted basis or that, if it is
successful in doing so, that the farmout will be on the exact terms described
above. In any case, it is Fortune's intention to participate in the drilling of
Zydeco 3D Venture projects as they are completed and permitted for drilling.
The Company also has a right under the Zydeco 3D Venture to "farmout" a
portion or all of its interest in each prospect to Zydeco under a put
arrangement in the exploration agreement. Zydeco has an identical right to
farmout to Fortune. In the event of such a farmout of a 50% working interest,
Fortune or Zydeco would retain a negotiated overriding royalty convertible into
a working interest or a default arrangement of a one percent overriding royalty
interest in the project, convertible into a 12-1/2% working interest after
Zydeco or Fortune recouped its drilling costs of the well from production.
Should either Fortune or Zydeco farmout a smaller working interest to one
another, the overriding royalty and after-payout working interests would be
proportionately reduced.
Zydeco and Fortune entered into a farmout of the Polaris Project to Southern
Gas Company of Delaware ("Southern") on May 31, 1995 (the "Polaris Farmout").
Under the terms of the farmout, Southern paid Zydeco and Fortune an aggregate of
$100,000 in exchange for 100% of the working interest in the Project. Zydeco and
Fortune also retained a 6.166% overriding royalty interest of which 4.166% is
convertible to a 12-1/2% working interest after Southern receives payout from a
completed well. In March 1996, Southern conveyed its rights under the Polaris
Farmout to a third party ("Farmee") which subsequently drilled a well which was
plugged and abandoned in October 1996. The 100% working interest in the Polaris
Project will revert back to Fortune and Zydeco unless the Farmee commits to
drill a substitute well within a time frame provided for in the Polaris Farmout
agreement.
In January 1996, the Company drilled a well on the Aurora project. Zydeco
did not participate in the working interest in the well. The well reached total
depth on January 18, 1996. Well logs indicated that the well had penetrated
three hydrocarbon reservoirs. However, given the significant costs of completing
the well and installing a production platform, management elected not to
complete it. The Company's cost to drill the well of approximately $832,000 was
expensed as dryhole costs primarily in 1995. Management is evaluating whether to
drill another well on the project in light of the hydrocarbon zones shown on the
well logs. Although not part of the Zydeco 3D Venture, the Company participated
with Zydeco in another well which encountered mechanical difficulties before
reaching its first objective and was temporarily plugged in August 1996. The
Company expensed as dryhole costs in the third quarter of 1996 approximately
$395,000 in prospect acquisition and drilling costs attributable to its 13.3%
non-operating working interest in this well. The working interest owners in the
prospect are evaluating methods to overcome the drilling problem.
SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO
On June 24, 1994, the Company acquired non-operating working interests,
ranging from 21.5625% to 25% in 70,000 producing, development and exploratory
acres in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. Of this amount, 60,000 acres are held
under three Mineral Development Agreements ("MDA's"), of 20,000 gross acres
each, from the Jicarilla Apache Indian Tribe (the "Tribe"). (See also "Business
and Properties - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity - San Juan Basin, New
Mexico") Under these MDA's, certain development activities are required to
maintain each of the acreage blocks.
Since June 1994, Fortune has participated in drilling seven wells and
shooting approximately 70 miles of new seismic data. Two of the seven wells were
completed as producing wells. One was plugged and abandoned and three are
temporarily shut in pending further evaluation. One 8,500 foot horizontal well
was drilled on the Cedar Canyon MDA acreage. This well was drilled, then
re-drilled and then the operator elected to attempt further re-drill operations.
The Company decided not to participate in these further re-drill operations.
Under the non-consent provisions of the Operating Agreement, should the well
prove commercially productive, the Company would begin receiving revenues, if at
all, after the consenting partners has received a return of 400% of their
investment incurred after the Company's non-consent. (See " - Legal Proceedings"
for information regarding recently settled litigation affecting this well.)
Fortune's capital expenditures for the six wells drilled in 1994, the
seismic projects, lease bonuses and other activities, including pipelines and
facilities, was approximately $1.1 million. The costs for drilling and
completing one well and the completion of two additional wells in 1995 was
approximately $375,000. The Company has not participated in the drilling of any
additional wells in 1996.
21
<PAGE>
There are no immediate plans to conduct further evaluations of the wells
that are temporarily shut in or to drill additional wells in this field. AMPOLEX
USA, Inc. (AMPOLEX), the current operator of the field, was recently acquired by
Mobil Corporation, and has informed Fortune that AMPOLEX intends to sell its
interest in the field. AMPOLEX has inquired as to whether Fortune would also be
interested in selling its interest with AMPOLEX and Fortune has indicated it
would review any offers which are received by AMPOLEX. In late July 1996, the
Company received invoices from AMPOLEX, billing Fortune for $232,805 of
outstanding accounts receivable attributable to two other working interest
owners in the properties which AMPOLEX failed to collect from such owners. The
Company is reviewing this matter and has not determined whether it owes any
portion of such amounts. AMPOLEX has informed Fortune that the amount is
attributable to development drilling costs which were not paid by such other
owners. In the event the Company is required to pay any portion of the $232,805,
any amounts attributable to development drilling costs would be capitalized by
the Company as oil and gas property cost.
WEBB COUNTY, TEXAS
The Company has a 20% interest in a proved undeveloped infill location
within the Belle Pepper Field, located in Webb County in south Texas. In June
1994, the Company participated in the drilling of a 10,000 foot exploratory test
well to the Lobo sand which was determined to be non-commercial. Fortune had a
25% working interest in this well, and its dry hole costs were $115,000.
Additionally, the Company took a writedown of $200,000 for its acreage cost in
this exploration project. (See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations")
REFUGIO COUNTY, TEXAS
Since acquiring an interest in the LaRosa Field in February 1994, the
Company has participated in over two dozen natural gas and two oil recompletions
in new zones of shut-in wells, of which 20 have been successful. The Company
plans to participate in a 3D seismic program over the 989 productive acres and
the 2,700 undeveloped acres held by production and offsetting the proved
productive acreage and additional acreage being acquired under seismic options.
It is hoped that prospects will be defined by the 3D seismic program and that
development drilling and exploratory drilling on the undeveloped acreage could
commence in 1997.
AWP FIELD, MCMULLEN COUNTY, TEXAS
There are 11 proved developed locations remaining to be drilled in the AWP
field located in McMullen County, in South Texas on either 40 or 80 acre
spacing. The operator of the field is currently in discussion with the
landowners to reduce their royalty from 35% to 25% on several of the remaining
locations. The Company's estimated share of the drilling and completion costs
for each of these wells is $43,000. In February 1996, developmental drilling was
resumed with the commencement of drilling the Bracken Ranch #47 well location
which was successfully completed as a producer.
22
<PAGE>
DRILLING ACTIVITIES
The following table sets forth information regarding development and
exploratory wells drilled by Fortune in the years ended December 31, 1993, 1994
and 1995:
WELL DRILLING ACTIVITY
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1993 1994 1995
---- ---- ----
GROSS WELLS
Productive 3.00 5.00 1.0
Dry 0.00 3.00 -
---- ---- ---
Total 3.00 8.00 1.0
==== ==== ===
NET WELLS
Productive 0.40 1.18 .20
Dry 0.00 0.47 -
---- ---- ---
Total 0.40 1.65 .20
==== ==== ===
ACQUISITION AND DIVESTITURE ACTIVITY
DIVESTITURE OF CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES
On February 23, 1996, Fortune sold its interest in all but one of its
California properties for cash in the amount of $840,000. The properties sold
consisted of the Company's interest in the Hopper Canyon, Holser Canyon, Oxnard
and Sheils Canyon Fields in Ventura County and the Bacon Hills Field in Kern
County. The sale was effective December 31, 1995. In connection with the sale,
Fortune paid commissions and expenses of approximately $75,000. The Company sold
its remaining California property, the Sespe Field, Ventura County, California,
to Seneca Resources for approximately $300,000 net of closing adjustments in
April 1996. The Company took an impairment of $1.4 million against its 1995
results as a result of these sales.
All of the Company's California properties were pledged to secure the
Company's Credit Facility with Bank One. Concurrently with the closing of the
sale of the non-Sespe properties, Fortune paid down the Credit Facility by $1.1
million, representing the entire indebtedness secured by the Company's
California properties.
The closing of the sale of the California properties and the relocation of
the Company's headquarters to Houston completed the Company's strategic move to
focus its efforts on exploration in the Gulf Coast.
At December 31, 1995, Fortune owned and operated 39 gross and 29.92 net
wells located in California (including all the wells that were sold in 1996).
Production in California during 1995 totaled approximately 57,160 net barrels of
oil and 66,292 net Mcf of gas. This represented about 62% of the Company's 1995
oil production and about 7% of its gas production. The Sespe property comprised
approximately 26% of Fortune's net proved oil reserves and 1% of Fortune's net
proved gas reserves as of December 31, 1995.
Despite the high percentage of oil production represented by these
properties, the costs of operating the wells in California was, in the view of
management, disproportionately high in relation to the revenues generated. The
high cost of production in California on the Company's properties was a result
of several factors, including the low gravity of the oil, the small production
from each well and environmental and worker's compensation costs.
SOUTH TIMBALIER BLOCK 76 ACQUISITION
On December 11, 1995, Fortune acquired a 16-2/3% working interest (12-1/2%
net revenue interest) in a 5,000 acre producing oil and gas property offshore
Louisiana. The property, known as the South Timbalier Block 76 (the "South
Timbalier Block"), includes a producing well, drilling and production platform
and transmission line. The effective date for oil and gas purposes was June 1,
1995. Therefore, Fortune received the net cash flow from the well to its
interest from June 1, 1995. The effective date for financial reporting purposes
was November 1, 1995. In connection with this acquisition, the Company paid $2.1
million at closing and issued 150,000 warrants exercisable over a two year
period at prices from $4.00 to $6.00 per share. Fortune also granted an
intermediary in the transaction the option, exercisable until
23
<PAGE>
March 11, 1996, to acquire a 4-1/6% working interest in the South Timbalier
Block. On March 8, 1996 that option was exercised for $790,000 plus the
retention by Fortune of a $150,000 deposit for a total of $940,000. The exercise
of this option reduced the Company's interest in the block to a 12-1/2% working
interest (9.375% net revenue interest) effective January 1, 1996. The closing of
the exercise of the option took place on March 11, 1996.
On April 29, 1996, the South Timbalier well was shut in due to a mechanical
failure of downhole equipment. A remedial workover, started June 16, 1996, cost
the Company approximately $300,000. The well came back on line July 6, 1996 and
as of the date hereof is producing approximately 16 Mmcf of gas and 1,100 Bbls
of condensate per day.
In order to finance the acquisition of the South Timbalier Block and also to
provide the Company with additional working capital, Fortune issued 1,321,117
shares of its Common Stock to a group of overseas investors in a transaction
which qualified for an exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 under Regulation S. From this sale, the Company netted
approximately $3.3 million after payment of expenses of the offering. The
balance of approximately $1 million remaining after payment of the purchase
price for the South Timbalier Block interest was added to working capital to be
used for general corporate purpose. The shares were sold subject to certain
"reset" provisions pursuant to which the purchasers could receive additional
shares if the price of the Common Stock were to drop below a certain price
during a subsuquent calculation period. As a result of the decline in the price
of the Common Stock in the first quarter of 1996, 1,266,000 additional shares
are subject to issue under the reset provisions. However, the Company is
currently investigating certain alleged irregularities in the trading in its
Common Stock and is uncertain whether it will be required to issue additional
shares. Claims for certain of these shares are the subject of pending
litigation. (See "Legal Proceedings")
SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO
On June 24, 1994, Fortune concluded the purchase of a 25% interest in
EnRe-1, LLC, a newly formed Texas Limited Liability Company, of which EnRe
Corporation is the manager. EnRe-1, LLC owns three Jicarilla Apache Minerals
Development Agreements covering 60,000 producing, development and exploratory
acres in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico and associated tangible property. At the
same time, the Company acquired an approximately 22% working interest in certain
mineral, oil and gas leasehold interests in an additional 10,000 exploratory
acres in Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, from EnRe Corporation. (The 25% interest
in EnRe-1, LLC and an approximately 22% working interest in the 10,000
exploratory acres are collectively referred to as the "EnRe Assets.") The EnRe
Assets were acquired for $1,375,000 in cash. The effective date under the
purchase method of accounting for transferring revenues and expenses on these
properties was determined to be June 1, 1994. (See "Legal Proceedings" for
information regarding litigation which was recently settled between the Company
and the operator of the EnRe Assets.)
BROOKLYN UNION EXPLORATION COMPANY, INC.
On February 8, 1994, the Company completed an acquisition of a 50% working
interest in a 3,689 acre lease in the La Rosa Natural Gas Field in Refugio
County, Texas from Brooklyn Union Exploration Company, Inc. for $760,000. The
effective date of the transaction using the purchase method of accounting was
February 1, 1994. The acquisition consisted of 12 producing wells, four
saltwater disposal wells and 35 shut-in wells with total new proved reserves to
the Company of one BCFE and additional probable reserves behind pipe. The lease
includes 2,700 undeveloped acres adjacent to production which was acquired for
future exploration. The Company plans to participate in a 3D seismic program,
contemplated to begin in late 1996 or early 1997, to help define exploration
projects within the undeveloped acreage and the potential for other undiscovered
reserves within the productive field limits.
24
<PAGE>
MICHAEL PETROLEUM, ET AL.
On October 5, 1993, the Company completed the acquisition of certain
mineral, oil and gas leasehold interests and associated tangible property from
Michael Petroleum Corporation, Brazos Resources, Inc., Pioneer Drilling Company
and Endowment Energy Partners. The mineral, oil and gas leasehold interests
include working interests in producing and non-producing oil and gas properties
located in Webb County, Texas. The Lobo sand in this area has very low
permeability (under one millidarce) which has qualified all the acquired
production as a "tight" gas sand. As a tight gas sand, the production, from
wells drilled before January 1, 1993, is exempt from Texas state severance tax
on the gas production and qualifies for the federal Section 29 tax credit.
Fortune paid an adjusted price of $6,457,386 in cash and 195,000 three year
common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $3.88 for the properties. The
effective date under the purchase method of accounting for transferring revenue
and expense on these properties was July 1, 1993.
OTHER ACQUISITIONS
Prior to 1994, the Company made various other acquisitions, primarily of
producing properties located in California, which have since been sold.
OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS
OIL AND GAS RESERVES
The Company's reserves are located in Texas and offshore Louisiana. All of
the Company's California reserves were sold in 1996. Proved reserves represent
estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which geological and
engineering data demonstrate to be reasonably certain to be recoverable in the
future from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.
Proved developed oil and gas reserves are proved reserves that can be expected
to be recovered through existing wells using existing equipment and operating
methods.
The oil and gas reserve estimates at December 31, 1993 and 1994, were
reviewed by Huddleston & Co., Inc., Houston, Texas, independent petroleum
engineers, and Sherwin D. Yoelin, Los Angeles, California, independent petroleum
engineer. For the year ended December 31, 1995, the oil and gas reserve
estimates were reviewed by Huddleston.
Such estimates are subject to numerous uncertainties inherent in the
estimation of quantities of proved reserves and in the projection of future
rates of production, prices and the timing of development expenditures. The
accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of available data and of
engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. The future cash inflow,
as reflected in the "Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves", determined from such reserve data are
estimates only, and the present values thereof should not be construed to be the
current market values of the Company's oil and gas reserves or the costs that
would be incurred to obtain equivalent reserves. While the reserve estimate
presented herein is believed to be reasonable, it should be viewed with the
understanding that subsequent production of oil and gas from each reservoir, the
timing and success of future development drilling and changes in pricing
structure or market demand will affect the reserve estimate. (See "Risk Factors
- - Risks Associated with the Oil and Gas Industry - Uncertainty of Estimates of
Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues")
25
<PAGE>
The following sets forth information with respect to estimated proved oil
and gas reserves as determined by Fortune's independent petroleum engineers
attributable to the Company's interests in oil and gas properties as of December
31, 1993, 1994 and 1995.
ESTIMATED NET RESERVE QUANTITIES
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995
--------- --------- ---------
Total Proved Reserves(1):
Oil (Bbls) ......................... 813,000 1,647,000 347,000
Natural Gas (Mcf) .................. 5,562,000 5,911,000 5,938,000
--------- --------- ---------
Equivalent Bbls(BOE)(2) .............. 1,740,000 2,632,000 1,337,000
========= ========= =========
Total Proved Developed Reserves:
Oil (Bbls) ......................... 666,000 675,000 324,000
Natural Gas (Mcf) .................. 4,221,000 3,317,000 4,686,000
--------- --------- ---------
Equivalent Bbls(BOE)(2) .............. 1,370,000 1,228,000 1,105,000
========= ========= =========
- ------------
(1) Estimates of oil and gas reserves are based in part on the price at which
the product was sold as of the end of each year; and if the cost of producing
the oil and gas exceeds the sales price, the quantity of "recoverable reserves"
is reduced. The increase in oil reserves from December 31, 1993 to December 31,
1994 is primarily due to the increase in the average oil price received by the
Company at the end of 1994 ($14.62 per barrel compared to $10.21 per barrel,
respectively) and the resulting increase in economically recoverable quantities.
The decrease in reserves from December 31, 1994 to December 31, 1995 is
primarily due to the transfer to oil and gas properties held for sale of
reserves attributed to the Company's California properties which were sold in
February 1996, and which represented approximately 1.4 million barrels of oil
and 1.5 BCF of natural gas in the Company's Proved Reserves at December 31,
1994, partially offset by the acquisition of the South Timbalier Block 76 which
added proved reserves of 174,000 barrels of oil and 2.9 BCF of natural gas on
the acquisition date.
(2) After conversion (6:1); six mcf of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil.
DISCOUNTED PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NET REVENUES
The following table represents the estimated future net revenues
(unescalated and discounted at 10% per annum) and the present value of the
future estimated net reserves from the proved developed producing, proved
developed non-producing and the proved undeveloped reserves at December 31,
1993, 1994 and 1995.
DISCOUNTED PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NET REVENUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cumulative Future Net Revenue(1) $12,835,000 $15,932,000 $12,600,000
less adjustment to give effect to a
10% annual discount (4,281,000) (7,784,000) (3,658,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
8,554,000 8,148,000 8,942,000
less discounted present value of
future income taxes -- -- --
---------- ---------- -----------
$8,554,000 $ 8,148,000 $ 8,942,000
========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
- ----------------
(1) The decline in the 10% discounted value of future net revenue from December
31, 1993, to December 31, 1994 is primarily due to the difference in the average
gas price received by the Company at those dates ($2.28 per MMBTU compared to
$1.39 per MMBTU, respectively) and the resulting decline in gas quantities
offset by increases in reserves from higher oil prices in 1994 as compared to
1993 year end of $14.62 and $10.21, respectively. The increase in net revenues
from December 31, 1994 to December 31, 1995, is primarily due to higher
production levels of the newly acquired properties as well as higher average
sale prices obtained for that production compared to the prices obtained for the
California production. The increase in 10% discounted value at December 31, 1995
is due to the net effect of acquired reserves offshore Louisiana and higher
natural gas prices of $2.05 per MMBTU at December 31, 1995 as compared to $1.39
per MMBTU at December 31, 1994 offset by the exclusion of the California
properties sold in February 1996.
26
<PAGE>
PRODUCTION
The approximate net production data related to the Company's properties
for the periods ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995 is set forth below:
NET PRODUCTION DATA
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995
-------- -------- --------
Oil (Bbls) ................... 78,737 87,615 91,981
Gas (Mcf) .................... 723,878 1,016,771 909,000
PRICES AND PRODUCTION COSTS
The following table sets forth the approximate average sales prices and
production (lifting) costs per barrel of oil and per Mcf of gas produced and
sold in the United States from the Company's oil and gas leases for the years
ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995:
AVERAGE SALES PRICES AND PRODUCTION COSTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1993 1994 1995
---- ---- ----
Average Sale Price Received:
Oil (per bbl) ......................... $ 14.33 $ 14.14 $ 14.66
Gas (per Mcf) ......................... 2.28 2.09 1.77
Average Production Cost
per BOE ............................. 4.84 4.24 6.22
PRODUCING WELLS
The following table lists the total gross and net producing oil and gas
wells in which Fortune had an interest at December 31, 1995:
PRODUCING WELLS
------------------------------------------
GROSS NET
OIL GAS OIL GAS
--- --- --- ----
Texas ...................... 59 30 7.4 9.9
Louisiana .................. 0 1 0.0 0.1
New Mexico ................. 4 2 0.7 0.4
California ................. 6 0 4.2 0.0
-- -- ---- ----
Total ................. 69 33 12.3 10.4
== == ==== ====
An additional 28 gross and 9.59 net wells owned by the Company are either
shut-in, awaiting recompletion or are used for waste water injection. These well
counts exclude the California wells that were sold on February 23, 1996. The
other California wells were sold in April 1996. (See "Business and Properties -
Acquisition and Divestiture Activity - Divestiture of California Properties")
27
<PAGE>
PRINCIPAL CUSTOMERS
For the year ended December 31, 1993, approximately 68% of the Company's
produced oil and gas was sold to Texaco Trading and Transportation, Inc. and 14%
to Enron. For the year ended December 31, 1994, 48% of the Company's produced
gas was sold to Michael Gas Marketing Co., Inc., 25% to Tenneco and 15% to
Enron, while 72% of the Company's produced oil was sold to Texaco Trading and
Transportation and 8% to Enron. During 1995, 56% of the Company's oil production
was sold to Texaco Trading and Transportation and 10% to Laroco, LLP; 29% of the
Company's gas production was sold to Laroco LLP, 26% to Michael Gas Marketing
and 16% to AWP and 16% to PetroFina.
The Company believes that the loss of any of these customers should not have
any material adverse effect on the Company, since there are a large number of
companies which purchase crude oil and natural gas in the areas in which the
Company operates.
PROPERTIES
LEASEHOLD ACREAGE
Fortune's holdings of developed and undeveloped leasehold acreage as of
December 31, 1995 were approximately as follows:
LEASEHOLD ACREAGE
----------------------------------------------
DEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED
------------------ --------------------
GROSS NET GROSS NET
----- ----- ------ ------
Texas 5,544 1,120 3,960 1,468
New Mexico 1,800 405 68,200 16,106
California(1) 260 260 380 380
Oklahoma 80 5 - -
Louisiana 500 83 25,047 11,023
----- ----- ------ ------
Total 8,184 1,873 97,587 28,977
===== ===== ====== ======
- ------------
(1) See "Business and Properties - Acquisition and Divestiture Activity -
Divestiture of California Properties".
TEXAS PROPERTIES
At December 31, 1995, Fortune owned an interest in 108 gross and 24.70 net
oil and gas wells located in Texas. During 1995, approximately 18,591 net
barrels of oil and 695,418 net Mcf of gas were produced from the Texas
properties as compared to approximately 19,348 net barrels of oil and 930,448
net mcf of gas in 1994.
The Texas properties, which are primarily non-operated, comprised
approximately 51% of Fortune's net proven gas reserves and 24% of Fortune's net
proven oil reserves at December 31, 1995.
NEW MEXICO PROPERTIES
At December 31, 1995, Fortune owned an interest in 6 gross and 1.07 net oil
and gas wells located in New Mexico. During the twelve months ended December 31,
1995, approximately 8,377 net Bbls of oil and 25,700 Mcf of gas were produced
from the New Mexico properties compared to 5,246 net Bbls. of oil and 17,697
produced by the New Mexico properties in 1994 for the period following their
acquisition on June 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994. Properties located in New
Mexico, which are all non-operated, represented a negligible portion of
Fortune's net proven gas reserves and comprised 1% net proven oil reserves at
December 31, 1995.
28
<PAGE>
LOUISIANA PROPERTIES
At December 31, 1995, Fortune owned an interest in 1 gross and .125 net gas
and condensate well located in Louisiana. For the two months period ended
December 31, 1995, approximately 7,853 net barrels of oil and 121,630 net Mcf of
gas were produced from the Louisiana properties.
The Louisiana properties, which are non-operated, comprised approximately
47% of Fortune's net proven gas reserves and 48% of Fortune's net proven oil
reserves at December 31, 1995.
CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES
At December 31, 1995, Fortune owned and operated 9 gross and 6.3 net oil
wells located in California. Production in California during 1995 totaled
approximately 57,160 net barrels of oil and 66,292 net Mcf of gas. Production
from California during 1994 totaled approximately 63,021 net barrels of oil and
68,626 net Mcf of gas. The decrease in California oil production in 1995 is due
primarily to the shut down of the Company's Hopper Canyon facility from February
1995 to late June 1995 due to damage to the access road caused by severe
flooding during heavy storms in January 1995.
Properties located in California, which were all operated by the Company,
comprised approximately 26% of Fortune's net proven oil reserves and 1% of
Fortune's net proven gas reserves as of December 31, 1995. (See "Business and
Properties - Acquisition and Divestitures Activity Divestiture of California
Properties")
TITLE TO PROPERTIES
Detailed title examinations were performed for many of the Company's
properties in December 1993 and January 1994 in conjunction with the Company's
credit facility with Bank One, Texas, and title opinions were issued. In
November 1995, title on the Company's South Timbalier Block 76 offshore
Louisiana acquisition was examined. The Company believes it holds valid title on
all its properties, free and clear of any liens or encumbrances except for
encumbrances described herein. Title opinions are obtained on newly acquired
properties as of the date of the closing. As is customary in the oil and gas
industry, the Company performs only a perfunctory title examination at the time
exploratory oil and gas properties are acquired. Prior to the commencement of
drilling operations, a thorough title examination is conducted and any
significant defects are remedied before proceeding with operations. All of the
Company's producing leasehold interests have been pledged to secure corporate
indebtedness with Bank One, Texas. Transfers of many of the Company's properties
are subject to various restrictions, including the requirement of obtaining the
consent of the landowner in many instances.
OFFICE FACILITIES
In February 1996, the Company relocated its headquarters to Houston, Texas.
Prior to that, the Company leased office space in Agoura Hills, California. The
lease in Agoura Hills, California currently expires in 1997. On February 13,
1996, the Company entered into an agreement with Animation Magazine to sublease
the Agoura Hills office space, under terms and conditions identical to those
contained in the Company's lease with its landlord, for the balance of the term
of Fortune's lease. It was also agreed that Fortune would assume the balance of
the 8 months remaining on Animation Magazine's lease on its present location.
This agreement is effective as of March 1, 1996. Rent for the 4,777 square feet
which the Company occupied was $53,000 in 1995, $45,000 in 1994, $43,000 in
1993. At its present location Fortune occupies approximately 5,400 square feet
of office space under a lease agreement with a term of 5 years. The first year's
rent is expected to be $49,000 and, for 1997, $84,000. (See Note 8 of Notes to
Financial Statements)
29
<PAGE>
COMPETITION
Fortune competes with numerous other companies and individuals in the
acquisition of oil and gas properties, the marketing of oil and gas and the
recruitment of experienced personnel. Fortune's competitors include major oil
companies, other small producers, investment groups and individuals, many of
which have financial resources and facilities substantially greater than those
of the Company. However, the major oil companies are selling many of their
smaller or marginal domestic properties. Many operating companies interested in
acquiring properties have greater capital resources than the Company. The
Company's acquisition approach is to concentrate on the properties of smaller
independents and it has had acquisition discussions with several of these
companies involving property acquisition for stock.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 1995, Fortune employed a total of nine persons, six of whom
were in management and administration and three in its oil and gas operations.
As of November 1996, the Company employed eight persons, all in management and
administration. In addition, the Company utilizes the services of outside
consultants in certain technical aspects of the Company's business. Fortune
utilizes these consultants to aid in the evaluation of Company projects and to
evaluate oil and gas assets for potential acquisitions. On February 5, 1996, the
Company relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas and has adequate
room for expansion at the new location in the event the Company chooses to hire
additional experienced personnel to support its program of exploration and
expansion.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
Environmental laws and regulations are having an increasing impact on
Fortune's operations in nearly all the jourisdictions where it has production.
Drilling activities and the production of oil and gas are subject to regulations
under federal and state pollution control and environmental laws and
regulations. It is impossible to predict accurately the effect that additional
environmental requirements may have on future earnings and operations, but it
will continue to be necessary to incur costs in complying with these laws and
regulations. Fortune spent approximately $25,000, $14,000 and $10,000 in
environmental compliance costs in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
The Company is not currently involved in any judicial or administrative
proceedings which concern any environmental regulation or requirement and
believes that it is in substantial compliance with applicable environmental
regulations. The Company believes that it is reasonably likely that the trend in
environmental legislation and regulations will continue toward stricter
standards. The Company is unaware of future environmental standards that are
reasonably likely to be adopted that will have a material effect on the
Company's financial position or results of operations, but cannot rule out the
possibility.
The Company has never had a material environmental problem, but if a
property in which Fortune has an interest is found to be contaminated, the
Company could be required to participate in a "clean up" program. Such a clean
up, depending on its magnitude and the Company's ownership interest therein,
could require undetermined amounts of capital and exceed the Company's ability
to pay. The Company has obtained primary insurance against oil spills providing
$2,000,000 of coverage with a $10,000 deductible for onshore hazards and
$1,000,000 of coverage with a $25,000 deductible for offshore hazards.
The operations of oil and gas properties covered by leases in which the
Company has or may acquire an interest will require compliance with spacing and
other conservation rules of various state commissions and of the United States
Geological Survey and the Bureau of Land Management with respect to federal oil
and gas acreage. Further, production may be limited under state regulations for
the prevention of waste. At the present time, the Company has no operations
which are adversely affected by well permitting, spacing regulations or
production limitations.
30
<PAGE>
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
"RESET" LITIGATION
On March 26, 1996, Fortune was served with a lawsuit which had been filed in
the Federal District Court in Delaware by one of the purchasers of Fortune
common stock in an offering in December 1995 under Regulation S. Under the terms
of the subscription agreement, the plaintiff was entitled to receive additional
shares of Fortune stock if the market price fell below a stated level during a
specified period following the 40-day holding period prescribed by Regulation S.
Plaintiff's complaint alleges that the price during the relevant interval did
fall below the level necessary for plaintiff to receive additional shares, but
that Fortune has failed to issue the stock.
Fortune has responded, admitting the essential allegations of the
complaint, but has pled, by way of affirmative defense, that suspicious trading
activity in Fortune stock occurred immediately prior to and during the time
period in which the additional-share allocation was computed. Fortune requested,
and the American Stock Exchange commenced, an investigation into such trading
irregularities. That investigation is continuing. In connection with this
litigation, the Company has placed 31,042 shares of common stock into escrow
with the Federal District Court in Delaware. This stock represents the maximum
number of shares that the Company will be required to issue to the plaintiff in
the event the Company's suspicions concerning the plaintiff's trading activity
prove to be unfounded. Fortune has also commenced, and intends to aggressively
pursue, discovery in an attempt to determine whether any action of the
purchasers in this offering contributed to its share price fluctuation. Fortune
does not intend to issue any additional shares to plaintiff pending the outcome
of the investigation unless compelled to do so by final court action.
On April 16, 1996, Fortune was advised that similar suits had been filed
in Federal District Court in New York by two other buyers in the same offering.
The allegations parallel those contained in the earlier suit filed in Delaware,
and Fortune is responding in the same manner. No shares of Fortune common stock
have been issued into escrow in connection with these two actions. Fortune is
also considering filing, in the New York actions, third-party claims against
persons and entities which the Company believes may have facilitated the
manipulative activity which it believes took place and cross-complaints against
the plaintiffs to recover damages sustained by the Company and its shareholders
as a result of such activity.
LEX LITIGATION
In initially entering into the LEX acquisition, Fortune was advised that the
stockholders of LEX included William D. Forster ("Forster"), BSR Investments, a
British Virgin Islands corporation ("BSR"), and Ensign Financial Group Limited,
a British Virgin Islands corporation ("Ensign"). At the time Fortune issued its
proxy statement for the special meeting of stockholders called to vote on the
LEX acquisition, Fortune was advised that the ownership of the Fortune Common
Stock and warrants to be issued in the acquisition was to be allocated one-third
each to Forster, BSR and Ensign. In preparing for the closing of the
acquisition, however, Fortune was advised that the only stockholders of LEX were
Forster and BSR and that they were the only persons or entities entitled to vote
on the merger of LEX with Fortune's subsidiary. Fortune obtained a written
representation from Forster and BSR to this effect and received a legal opinion
from LEX's counsel confirming these representations and confirming that all
corporate action on the part of LEX necessary to authorize the merger had
occurred.
On May 11, 1995, Baytree Associates, Inc. ("Baytree") and Ensign commenced
litigation in the Supreme Court of New York against Forster, BSR, Charif Souki
(the son of Samyr Souki, president of BSR), LEX and Fortune seeking to enjoin
the closing of the LEX acquisition by Fortune on the grounds that Ensign was
entitled to a one-third interest in the proceeds of the transaction, namely the
Common Stock and warrants to be issued by Fortune. Baytree also sought
$1,000,000 in damages from Fortune for allegedly providing investment banking
services to Fortune in connection with a Regulation S offering made by the
Company in February 1995 and the public offering made in June 1995.
At a hearing on May 12, 1995, the New York court dissolved the temporary
restraining order issued on May 11 which had prohibited the acquisition and
stated affirmatively that Fortune could proceed with the transaction. Since it
was clear from the Ensign lawsuit that Forster and BSR owned at least two-thirds
of the stock of LEX and could bind that corporation to proceed with the
transaction and since most of the Common Stock and warrants issued by Fortune
would remain in escrow following the closing, Fortune proceeded with the
acquisition, which closed on its scheduled closing date of May 12, 1995. In
issuing its Common Stock and warrants to complete the transaction, Fortune was
required to accept the representations made by Forster and BSR that they were
the only stockholders of LEX, but
31
<PAGE>
Fortune did not then, has not since, and will not in the future take any
position on who constituted the stockholders of LEX or who was entitled to the
shares and warrants issued by Fortune in the acquisition. Further, Fortune
advised Forster and BSR that the issues raised by Ensign would need to be
resolved by them and obtained from Forster and BSR an agreement to indemnify
Fortune against any claims from any third party asserting an ownership interest
in LEX.
At a subsequent hearing on May 22, 1995, the New York court granted the
Company's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the $1,000,000 claim against
Fortune. The court also dismissed Fortune and LEX from the suit with prejudice
based on an agreement of all parties. Forster, BSR and Souki are now the only
remaining defendants in the action. At the hearing, the parties agreed that the
escrow agent would retain and hold in escrow not less than 400,000 shares and
400,000 warrants, representing one-third of the total shares of Common Stock and
warrants issued in the transaction, pending further order of the court. Fortune
agreed to participate in the discovery process in the action as if it were a
party to the action and, as a matter of convenience to the court, agreed that
the New York court would retain jurisdiction over Fortune and LEX for purposes
of enforcing the provisions of the stipulation.
ENRE LITIGATION
On March 14, 1995, Fortune was served with a lawsuit filed in the District
Court of Bexar County, Texas by EnRe Corporation ("EnRe"), in which EnRe, as
operator of the Company's New Mexico properties, sought recovery of
approximately $438,000 allegedly owed by Fortune for the drilling of a certain
well on such properties. On March 24, 1995, Fortune answered EnRe's lawsuit and
filed a counterclaim against EnRe for an undeterminable amount for damages
suffered by Fortune for EnRe's actions. The Company subsequently amended its
counterclaim to allege negligence on the part of EnRe in carrying out operations
on the properties.
On March 30, 1995, a partial settlement was reached as to payment by Fortune
of undisputed well development costs in exchange for EnRe's
cooperation-operation in complying with provisions of the operating agreement to
report operating information to Fortune on a timely basis. As of April 24, 1995,
the Company had paid all well development costs which it believed to be
undisputed, totaling $174,499. On June 13, 1996 the lawsuits were settled by all
parties agreeing to waive any and all claims against each other.
32
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:
DIRECTOR AND/OR
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AGE TITLE
- ----------------- --- -----
Tyrone J. Fairbanks(1) 40 President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director
Dean W. Drulias(1)(2) 49 Executive Vice President, General Counsel,
Corporate Secretary and Director
Graham S. Folsom(1)(3) 39 Director
William T. Walker, Jr.(1)(2) 65 Director
Barry Feiner(1)(2) 62 Director
Gary Gelman(3) 31 Director
J. Michael Urban 43 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Assistant Secretary
John L. Collins 51 Vice President of Investor Relations
- ------------------
(1) Member of Executive Committee
(2) Member of Compensation Committee
(3) Member of Audit Committee
Mr. Tyrone J. Fairbanks has served as a Director of Fortune since January
1991. Mr. Fairbanks also serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company. Mr. Fairbanks served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company from January 1991 to June 1994. Prior to joining Fortune, Mr.
Fairbanks served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Fairbanks
& Haas, Inc. from January 1990 to January 1991. Fairbanks and Haas, Inc. was an
oil and gas exploration, production, acquisition and operations company located
in Ventura, California. Mr. Fairbanks co-founded Fairbanks & Haas, Inc. and
served in the capacity of Director and Executive Vice President from February
1987 to January 1990. Prior to Fairbanks & Haas, Inc., Mr. Fairbanks served in
positions of increasing responsibility in the area of accounting, finance,
administration and operations within various segments of the oil and gas
industry. Mr. Fairbanks attended California State University at Northridge and
continued his education with courses in finance and accounting at the University
of California at Los Angeles extension and the University of Pennsylvania -
Wharton Business School extension.
Mr. Dean W. Drulias was hired effective October 16, 1996 as Executive Vice
President and General Counsel. Prior to his employment by the Company, Mr.
Drulias was a stockholder of and a practicing attorney at the law firm of
Burris, Drulias & Gartenberg, a Professional Corporation, which served as
counsel to the Company since its incorporation in May 1987. Mr. Drulias has also
served as a director of the Company since 1991 and as Corporate Secretary since
July 1994. During 1994 and 1995, his former firm billed the Company a total of
$109,050 and $182,643, respectively, for legal fees and costs. He has practiced
law in the Los Angeles area since 1977 after graduating from Loyola Law School
and specializes in areas of energy, environmental and real property law. Mr.
Drulias received his B.A. degree from the University of California at Berkeley
in 1971.
Mr. Graham S. Folsom has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Klein
Ventures, Inc. since April 1987. Klein Ventures, Inc. is a diversified
investment company. Mr. Folsom has been active in the oil investments of such
company and its affiliates since 1987. Mr. Folsom has been licensed as a
Certified Public Accountant in the State of California since 1982 and is
responsible for all of the accounting and financial affairs of Klein Ventures
33
<PAGE>
and its affiliates. Mr. Folsom is chairman of the Company's Audit Committee. Mr.
Folsom is a graduate of University of the Pacific with a B.S. degree in business
administration.
Mr. William T. Walker, Jr. joined Fortune's Board after the successful
completion of Fortune's $7.4 million secondary equity offering in October 1993.
Mr. Walker founded Walker Associates, a corporate finance consulting firm for
investment banking, in 1985 and has participated in or been instrumental in
completing over $250 million in public and private offerings since its
inception. Prior to forming Walker Associates, Mr. Walker served as Executive
Vice President, Manager of Investment Banking, Member of the Board and Executive
Committee and Chairman of the Underwriting Committee for Bateman Eichler Hill
Richards, a New York Stock Exchange Member firm from 1969 to 1985 when Bateman
Eichler Hill Richards was purchased by Kemper Group. Prior to joining Bateman
Eichler Hill Richards, Mr. Walker served in various executive capacities and was
a partner with the investment banking firm of Glore Forgan, William R. Staats &
Co. in New York. Mr. Walker attended Stanford University. He also serves on the
board of directors of Go Video, Inc. (AMEX).
Mr. Barry Feiner was elected to the Company's Board of Directors on January
20, 1995. Mr. Feiner graduated from Columbia Law School and is a member of the
Bar of the State of New York. He has practiced law in the State of New York
since 1965. His practice concentrates on the areas of corporate and securities
law. Prior to beginning private practice, Mr. Feiner served on the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Feiner holds a B.A. degree from Brandeis
University. Mr. Feiner is the Chairman of the Company's Compensation Committee.
Mr. Gary Gelman was elected to the Company's Board of Directors on January
20, 1995. Mr. Gelman graduated from San Diego State University in 1989 and has
served as president of GAR-COR Holding Corporation, a real estate management and
brokerage firm, since that time. Mr. Gelman is a principal of and serves as a
loan consultant for National Bank of New York City.
Mr. J. Michael Urban was hired effective March 11, 1996, as the Company's
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Urban formerly served as
Vice-President, Finance with Norcen Explorer, Inc. (Norcen), a Houston based oil
and gas company with operations primarily in the offshore Gulf of Mexico. Norcen
is a wholly owned subsidiary of Norcen Energy Resources Limited, a Canadian
public company. Mr. Urban had been with Norcen since March 1986. Prior to
joining Norcen, Mr. Urban was with Arthur Andersen & Co. for six years and a
private Gulf Coast oil and gas company for three years. Mr. Urban received his
B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Texas in 1976 and has been a
Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas since 1978.
Mr. John L. Collins was hired by the Company as Vice President of Investor
Relations effective May 30, 1995. Mr. Collins formerly served as Vice President
of Investor Relations with Texas Meridian Resources Corporation, a Texas based
oil and gas company, a position he held from January 1991 until his resignation
to join Fortune in May 1995. Mr. Collins became a registered representative with
Merrill Lynch in 1970 and spent 20 years in the securities industry, serving as
Vice President-Investments with A.G. Edwards & Company from 1980 to 1989. During
1990, he held a sales position with Frontier Directory.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
As compensation to outside directors, the Company pays directors' fees
equal to $2,500 per quarter. Inside directors do not receive any compensation
for serving as directors.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Board of Directors met 19
times. The audit committee met one time and the compensation committee met three
times. No current directors missed more than two Board meetings, except Mr.
Gelman. Mr. Fairbanks and Mr. Drulias attended all Board meetings. Each member
of a Board committee attended all committee meetings.
The audit committee consists of two outside directors: Mr. Folsom and Mr.
Gelman. Currently, Graham Folsom is the chairman of the committee. It also meets
separately with representatives of the Company's
34
<PAGE>
independent auditors and with representatives of senior management. The
committee reviews the scope of audit coverage, the fees charged by the
independent auditors, matters relating to internal control systems and the
expenses of senior executives.
The compensation committee consists of three directors: Mr. Feiner Mr.
Drulias and Mr. Walker. Barry Feiner is the chairman of the Committee. The
committee proposes and administers the Company's stock option plans, long-term
incentive plans and executive incentive plans. In this capacity, the committee
recommends all option grants or awards to Company officers and executives. The
committee also recommends the establishment of policies dealing with various
compensation, pension and profit sharing plans, although at this time no such
plans have been created.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table lists the total compensation paid by the Company to
persons who served in the capacity of chief executive officer during the periods
indicated and to the only other executive officer who received annual
compensation in excess of $100,000:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM
ANNUAL COMPENSATION COMPENSATION
AWARDS
-------------------------------- -----------
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS OPTIONS/SARS
--------------------------- ---- -------- ------- ------------
Charles A. Champion(1) ... 1995
Chairman ................. 1994 $ 36,000 -- 50,975
Tyrone J. Fairbanks(2) ... 1995 $125,000 $25,000 105,599
President and CEO ........ 1994 $102,500 $15,000 78,900
- ------------
(1) Mr. Champion was elected Chief Executive Officer on June 23, 1994,
concurrently with the resignation of Daniel E. Pasquini as president. Mr.
Champion did not previously serve as an executive officer of Fortune. On
January 5, 1995, Mr. Champion resigned as Chief Executive Officer and Mr.
Fairbanks was elected by the Board to succeed him in that position. Mr.
Champion remained as Chairman of the Board until his resignation as
Chairman and Director on February 8, 1996.
(2) The only years in which Mr. Fairbanks received salary and bonus exceeding
$100,000 were 1995 and 1994. Mr. Fairbanks was elected President of
Fortune on June 23, 1994, and became Chief Executive Officer on January 5,
1995. Prior to his election as President, he served as a Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer.
On May 30, 1995 the Company hired Mr. John L. Collins as Vice President of
Investor Relations with a salary of $96,000 per year. Fortune issued to Mr.
Collins 25,000 stock purchase warrants exercisable at $3.25 (the market price of
the Common Stock on May 30, 1995, the date of issue) and expiring May 30, 2000.
On March 11, 1996 the Company hired Mr. J. Michael Urban as Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer with a salary of $120,000 a year. Fortune issued Mr.
Urban 35,000 stock purchase warrants exercisable at $2.5625 (the market price of
the Common Stock on March 11, 1996, the date of issue) and expiring on March 11,
2001.
On October 16, 1996 the Company hired Mr. Dean W. Drulias as Executive
Vice President and General Counsel with a salary of $125,000 a year. The Company
issued Mr. Drulias 20,000 stock purchase warrants exercisable at $2.75 per share
(the market price of the Common Stock on October 16, 1996, the date of issue)
and expiring on October 16, 2001.
35
<PAGE>
The following table lists the outstanding options held on December 31,
1995 by the Company's Chief Executive Officer under Company's Stock Option
Plans:
AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISE IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FY-END OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
AT FY-END AT FY-END (1)
SHARES ACQUIRED EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME ON EXERCISE VALUE REALIZED($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- --------------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tyrone J. Fairbanks - - 216,999/0 $461,122/$0
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) Based upon the Company's closing price at November 21, 1996,
"in-the-money" value of these stock options is $94,937.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Tyrone J.
Fairbanks, its President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides
that if employment is terminated for any reason other than for cause, death or
disability within two years following a change in control (which for purposes of
this Agreement means a change in the majority of the Board of Directors
following certain special events) Mr. Fairbanks is entitled to receive a single
payment equal to two year's compensation and all shares of Common Stock subject
to stock options then held by him without payment of the exercise price
therefor. Mr. Fairbanks' agreement also provides for two (2) years of consulting
services upon the completion of the primary term of his contract at forty
percent (40%) of the last compensation thereunder. Mr. Fairbanks' current
employment agreement provides for an annual salary of $150,000. The term of Mr.
Fairbanks' employment contract expires December 31, 1997.
The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Dean W. Drulias,
its Executive Vice President and General Counsel. The agreement provides that if
employment is terminated for any reason other than for cause, death or
disability within two years following a change in control (which for purposes of
this Agreement means a change in the majority of the Board of Directors
following certain special events) Mr. Drulias is entitled to receive a single
payment equal to two year's compensation and all shares of Common Stock subject
to stock options then held by him without payment of the exercise price
therefor. Mr. Drulias' agreement also provides for two (2) years of consulting
services upon the completion of the primary term of his contract at forty
percent (40%) of the last compensation thereunder. Mr. Drulias' current
employment agreement provides for an annual salary of $125,000. The term of Mr.
Drulias' employment contract expires December 31, 1998.
STOCK OPTIONS
Fortune has four Stock Option Plans. The plans cover all officers and
employees of the Company. Three of the plans also provide for options for
directors of the Company. Awards are made by the Board of Directors upon
recommendations of its Compensation Committee. There is no performance formula
or measure. Options granted under the 1987 plan must be exercised within ten
years of the date of grant or they are forfeited. Options granted under the 1988
plan, the 1991 plan and a new plan adopted in 1993 must be exercised within five
years of the date of grant or they are forfeited. No future options will be
granted under existing option plans at less than 85% of the fair market value of
the Common Stock.
36
<PAGE>
All options available under the 1987, 1988 and 1991 plans have been granted,
and no shares remain under any of these plans on which options may be granted.
Options under the 1993 plan available for grant in 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996
have been granted; additional options may be granted under the 1993 plan in
1997. Options have been granted as follows: (1) under the 1987 plan, options for
12,500 shares at a price of $2.60 per share; (2) under the 1988 plan, options
for 27,500 shares at $2.60 per share; under the 1991 plan, options for 32,500
shares at $6.00 per share; and (4) under the 1993 plan, options for 75,000
shares at $5.00 per share granted in 1993, options for 263,000 shares at $5.48
per share granted in 1994, options for 264,000 shares at $6.03 per share granted
in 1995, and options for 450,000 shares at $3.125 per share granted in 1996. The
prices of the options granted in 1991, 1993, 1994 and 1995 were reduced to $2.75
on January 12, 1995.
The following table shows the grants of stock options to each of the
executives named in the Summary Compensation Table during 1995. No options were
exercised by any of these individuals during 1995.
OPTION GRANTS IN 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL
SECURITIES OPTIONS/SAR'S
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO
OPTIONS/SAR'S EMPLOYEES IN EXERCISE OR BASE EXPIRATION
NAME GRANTED FISCAL YEAR PRICE ($/SH) DATE
---- ------------- ------------- --------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Charles A. 26,400 10.0% $2.75 05/08/1996
Champion
Tyrone J. 105,999 40.0% $2.75 01/12/2000
Fairbanks(1))
</TABLE>
------------
(1) Mr. Fairbanks also received a grant of 80,000 Five Year stock options in
1996, exercisable at $3.125 representing 18% of the Company's total
Options/SAR's granted to employees in 1996.
In the event of a change in control of the Company, the shares of the
Company's common stock subject to options granted to all option holders under
the Company's stock option plans will be issued to them without further action
on their part or the payment of the exercise price for such shares.
37
<PAGE>
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
As part of the relocation of Fortune Petroleum Corporation's headquarters to
Houston, Texas, the Company provided Tyrone J. Fairbanks, its President and
Chief Executive Officer, with an incentive relocation package to facilitate his
move to Texas. The package consisted of a payment by the Company of Mr.
Fairbanks' moving expenses, a non-recourse, unsecured loan in the amount of
$80,000 bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum, with $20,000 of such loan
forgiven in each of four consecutive years beginning in 1996 provided Mr.
Fairbanks is still employed by the Company or has been terminated by the Company
without cause, and a secured recourse loan in the amount of $70,000 also bearing
interest at the rate of 6% per annum, payable interest only for two years with a
$35,000 principal payment due on the second and third anniversary of the loan.
The Company also extended the term of Mr. Fairbanks' employment contract through
December 31, 1997.
On April 24, 1995, the Company obtained a $300,000 "bridge" loan to enable
it to pay certain expenses, including $100,000 on its Credit Facility. The loan
was obtained from LEX, which in turn had borrowed the funds from several
individuals. Upon the consummation of the Company's acquisition of LEX, it
became liable on such loans. The loans were repaid out of the proceeds of the
Company's recently concluded Common Stock offering. Among the individuals who
loaned funds to LEX were Mrs. William H. Forster, mother of William D. Forster,
a principal of LEX and a former director and principal stockholder of Fortune,
and John E. McConnaughy, Jr., formerly a principal stockholder of the Company.
(See "Principal Stockholders") Each of Mrs. Forster and Mr. McConnaughy loaned
LEX $100,000 and received from LEX, as an inducement to make the loan, 33,333
shares of Common Stock and 33,333 stock purchase warrants out of 170,000 shares
and 170,000 warrants issued to LEX prior to the closing of the acquisition. W.
Forster & Co., Inc., a corporation wholly owned by William D. Forster, received
a $30,000 placement fee from the Company for assistance in arranging the
$300,000 bridge loan. As a result of its acquisition of LEX, Fortune was
required, at the time the bridge loan was repaid, to accelerate the amortization
of the value of the shares paid by LEX to the lenders in connection with the
bridge loan in the amount of $150,000.
In order to provide additional capital for development activities, on
December 19 and 20, 1994, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $750,000 from
certain principal stockholders and from each of its directors then serving
(Messrs. Champion, Drulias, Fairbanks, Folsom and Walker). The directors loaned
$175,000 to the Company in the aggregate. $375,000 was obtained from Klein
Ventures, Inc., and $200,000 was obtained from Jack Farber. (See "Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management") The notes were
unsecured, bore interest at 11% per annum (1.5% above the Bank One, Texas, prime
rate), payable monthly, and were due six months from their respective dates of
issue. The loans from each of the directors were repaid in full on December 21,
1995. Both the Klein Ventures, Inc. and Farber notes permitted the holder to
elect to exchange their notes for shares of Common Stock at the price on the
date the notes were issued ($2.00 and $1.875 per share, respectively), and
Fortune reserved 294,166 shares of common stock for such purpose. Klein
Ventures, Inc. and the Estate of Jack Farber exercised the option contained in
their note agreement to convert the note to Fortune Common Stock. This option
was not available to the directors.
As additional consideration for making the loan, Klein Ventures, Inc.
received 10,000 stock purchase warrants with an exercise price of $2.40 per
share, and Mr. Farber received 35,000 stock purchase warrants with an exercise
price of $1.875 per share. The Company also agreed to name two individuals
nominated by Mr. Farber to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors. Barry
Feiner, Esq., who served as counsel to Mr. Farber prior to the latter's death on
May 5, 1995 and to Barry Blank, another principal stockholder of the Company,
and Mr. Gary Gelman, Mr. Farber's grandson, were elected to the Board of
Directors in January 1995 pursuant to this agreement. Both Mr. Feiner and Mr.
Gelman were re-elected to the board by the stockholders at the 1996 annual
meeting.
See "Management - Directors and Officers" for information regarding legal
services performed by Burris, Drulias & Gartenberg, A Professional Corporation,
for the Company and the Representatives. Dean Drulias, an officer and director
of the Company, was formerly a stockholder of such law firm.
All of the foregoing transactions between the Company and members of
management or principal stockholders were, and any future transactions will be,
on terms no less favorable to the Company than those which could be obtained
from unaffiliated third parties. In addition, no future transaction will be
entered into between the
38
<PAGE>
Company and members of management or principal stockholders unless such
transactions are approved by a majority of the directors who are not members of
management or principal stockholders.
LIMITED LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS
In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company has
included a provision in its Certificate of Incorporation to limit the personal
liability of its directors for violations of their fiduciary duties. The
provision eliminates such directors' liability to the Company or its
stockholders for monetary damages, except (i) for any breach of the directors'
duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions
not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation
of law, (iii) for unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or
redemptions or (iv) for any transaction from which any director derived an
improper personal benefit.
This provision protects the Company's directors against personal liability
for monetary damages arising from breaches of their duty of care. Directors
remain liable for breaches of their duty of loyalty to the Company and its
stockholders and for the specific matters set forth above, as well as for
violations of the federal securities laws. The provision has no effect on the
availability of equitable remedies such as injunction or rescission.
Additionally, these provisions do not protect a director from activities
undertaken in any capacity other than that of director.
INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The Company's bylaws provide for indemnification of its officers and
directors to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law in effect at the time of a claim for indemnification. Such indemnification
applies to any threatened, pending or contemplated suit or proceeding arising by
reason of such person acting as an officer or director of the Company or its
affiliates.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Act may be
permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Company pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, the Company has been informed that in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.
39
<PAGE>
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table contains information at October 31, 1996, as to all
persons who, to the knowledge of the Company, were the beneficial owners of five
percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of the common stock of the
Company and of all officers and directors.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND NATURE PERCENT
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS(1)
---- ----------------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Barry Blank,
5353 N. 16th St., Phoenix, AZ(5) 811,313 6.8%
William D. Forster,
237 Park Ave, New York (2)(3) 795,000 6.7%
BSR Investments, Inc.,
Paris, France(2)(4) 715,000 6.0%
Klein Ventures, Inc.,
1307 E. Pine St., Lodi, CA(6) 640,017 5.5%
Tyrone J. Fairbanks (Director, President,
and CEO) 515 W. Greens Rd., Houston, TX(7) 318,440 2.7%
William T. Walker, Jr. (Director)
515 W. Greens Rd., Houston TX(7) 192,749 1.7%
John L. Collins (Vice President)
515 W. Greens Rd., Houston TX(7) 180,000 1.6%
Dean W. Drulias (Director, Executive Vice-President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary)
515 W. Greens Rd., Houston, TX(7) 106,241 *
Graham S. Folsom (Director)
515 W. Greens Rd., Houston, TX(7) 94,384 *
Gary Gelman (Director)
515 W. Greens Rd., Houston, TX(7) 55,112 *
J. Michael Urban (Vice President and CFO)
515 W. Greens Rd., Houston, TX(7) 55,000 *
Barry Feiner (Director)
515 W. Greens Rd., Houston, TX(7) (8) 49,612 *
All Officers and Directors
as a group of eight (8) persons 1,051,538 8.4%
</TABLE>
-----------------
(1) The asterisk (*) indicates less than 1%.
(2) Forster and BSR are the record holders of these shares issued in
connection with the LEX acquisition. Ensign Financial Group Limited
claims a one-third interest in such shares and the stock purchase
warrants issued in the acquisition. In light of the dispute which has
arisen over the ownership of these shares and warrants, the Company is
unable to state the beneficial ownership of such shares and warrants.
(See "Business and Properties - Legal Proceedings") If Ensign's position
is upheld by the New York courts and it is awarded one-third of the
securities issued in the LEX acquisition, to the best of the Company's
knowledge, the ownership, including shares underlying the stock purchase
warrants and other securities noted in footnote (3) and (4), would be as
follows:
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
-------------------- --------
Ensign Financial Group Limited, NY, NY ..... 800,000 6.8%
William D. Forster, New York, NY ........... 395,000 3.4%
BSR Investments, Inc., Paris, France ....... 315,000 2.7%
(3) Includes 515,000 shares of Common Stock underlying stock purchase
warrants exercisable at $4.75 per share and expiring April 2000.
40
<PAGE>
(4) Includes 515,000 shares of Common Stock underlying stock purchase
warrants exercisable at $4.75 per share and expiring April 2000. Based
on information provided to the Company by BSR, voting and dispositive
power is exercised by Samyr Souki, the president of BSR.
(5) Includes 279,200 shares of Common Stock and an additional 432,113 shares
of which are underlying 300,600 stock purchase warrants held by Mr.
Blank and exercisable at $3.75 per share and 100,000 shares of Common
Stock underlying 100,000 stock purchase warrants, exercisable at $2.40
per share, issued to the Underwriters in the Company's 1995 Equity
Offering which Mr. Blank acquired from Coleman & Company Securities,
Inc. Mr. Blank is a Vice President and registered representative with
Coleman and Company Securities, Inc.
(6) Klein Ventures, Inc. is owned by Mr. Bud Klein. The number of shares
shown includes 138,888 shares underlying stock purchase warrants
issued to Klein Ventures, Inc. in the Hinkle acquisition, 115,000
shares underlying 80,000 public stock purchase warrants acquired in
the Company's 1993 public equity offering exercisable at $3.75 per
share and an aggregate of 88,629 shares of stock owned by Klein Bros.
Holdings, Ltd., and 10,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock
purchase warrants with an exercise price of $2.40 per share issued to
Klein Ventures, Inc. (See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions") Each record owner possesses sole voting and disposition
power over such shares, and Klein Ventures, Inc. and Mr. Bud Klein
disclaim beneficial ownership of shares owned by Klein Bros. Holdings,
Ltd. which is owned by Klein Ventures, Inc. and five of Mr. Klein's
children and relatives. However, Klein Ventures, Inc., Klein Bros.
Holdings, Ltd. and Bud Klein may be considered a "group" under
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(7) Includes 296,999 shares issuable to Mr. Fairbanks upon the exercise of
stock options granted to him under the Company's various stock option
plans, exercisable at prices of $2.75 to $3.125 per share; an aggregate
of 376,100 shares issuable upon exercise of stock options granted to
other officers and directors under the Company's various stock option
plans, exercisable at prices of $2.75 to $3.125 per share; 88,289 shares
issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants (at $4.41 per
warrant) and 22,264 shares issuable upon exercise of 3,600 warrants (at
$11.14 each for 3.3097 shares of Common Stock and two stock purchase
warrants exercisable at $3.75 each for 1.4375 shares) issued in
connection with the Company's 1993 equity offering to William T. Walker,
Jr. prior to becoming a director of the Company; 25,000 shares issuable
upon the exercise of common stock purchase warrants (at $3.25 per share)
issued to John L. Collins on May 30, 1995; 35,000 shares issuable upon
the exercise of common stock purchase warrants (at $2.5625 per shares)
issued to J. Michael Urban on March 11, 1996; and 20,000 shares issuable
upon the exercise of common stock purchase warrants (at $2.75 per
shares) issued to Dean W. Drulias on October 16, 1996.
(8) All shares shown are owned by Mrs. Barry Feiner, wife of Barry Feiner,
and Mr. Feiner disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares.
41
<PAGE>
EXCHANGE OFFER
By this Prospectus, each Debentureholder is offered the opportunity to
convert some or all of his Debentures into 286 shares of Common Stock and 250
Exchange Warrants for each $1,000 principal amount of Debentures. Cash will be
issued in lieu of fractional shares. Debentureholders wishing to accept this
offer must tender the certificates evidencing their Debentures and a completed
Transmittal Letter in the form accompanying this Prospectus to Fortune Petroleum
Corporation, Attention: J. Michael Urban, Chief Financial Officer, 515 West
Greens Road, Suite 720, Houston, Texas, 77067 ON OR BEFORE THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS
ON JANUARY 16, 1997. Tenders received after that date will not be accepted,
provided that the Company reserves the right to extend the conversion period for
up to an additional 45 days upon written notice to all Debentureholders.
Debentureholders who have questions regarding the Exchange Offer should call the
Co-Conversion Agents: Mr. Brent W. Berry, Branch Manager for Brookstreet
Securities Corporation at (800) 466-8658, or Ms. Cynthia Keefover, Vice
President for Toluca Pacific Securities Corporation at (818) 955-6444.
Tenders once made are irrevocable, except that if Debentureholders holding
less than 80% in principal amount of the Debentures fail to tender their
Debentures for conversion, no tenders will be accepted and all tendered
Debentures will be returned.
Certificates evidencing the shares of Common Stock and Exchange Warrants
issued to each converting Debentureholder will be transmitted by the Company's
transfer agent by certified mail, return receipt requested, as soon as
practicable following the termination of the tender period. The Common Stock
received by the Debentureholders who convert, including any Common Stock
received through exercise of the Exchange Warrants, will not be tradable during
the first 90 days following the Closing Date. The Company will legend the stock
certificates evidencing the Common Stock issued in connection with the Exchange
Offer and will issue appropriate stop transfer instructions to its transfer
agent regarding this restriction.
Debentureholders tendering their Debentures whose tenders are accepted will
be entitled to receive interest on the Debentures through December 31, 1996.
Debentureholders tendering their Debentures whose tenders are accepted will NOT
be entitled to receive interest for any period subsequent to December 31, 1996.
Debentureholders not tendering their Debentures will continue to receive
interest on the Debentures, in accordance with the terms of the Debentures.
For services rendered in connection with the Exchange Offering, the
Co-Conversion Agents will receive warrants to purchase 40 shares of the Common
Stock for each $1,000 principal amount of Debentures tendered and accepted by
the Company. If all Debentures are tendered, the Co-Conversion Agents will
receive warrants to purchase a total of 69,000 shares. The Co-Conversion Agent
warrants will be exercisable for a period of three years from the Effective Date
at a price of $3.4965 per share.
The Company reserves the right to determine the validity and timeliness of
all tenders, and its determination shall be final.
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
Set forth below is a discussion of certain federal income tax consequences
to persons exchanging their Debentures for Common Stock and Exchange Warrants
pursuant to this offering. This discussion summarizes the opinion of Reish &
Luftman, Los Angeles, California, delivered to the Company in connection with
this offering. The discussion sets forth the material tax consequences to
investors in this offering but does not purport to deal with all aspects of
federal taxation (or with any aspect of state, local or foreign taxation) that
may be relevant to investors in light of their personal investment and tax
circumstances. Certain investors (including insurance companies, tax-exempt
organizations, financial institutions, broker-dealers, foreign corporations and
persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States) may be subject
to special rules not discussed below. HOLDERS OF DEBENTURES DESIRING TO ACCEPT
THE EXCHANGE OFFER ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS
42
<PAGE>
REGARDING THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF CONVERTING
THEIR DEBENTURES INTO COMMON STOCK AND EXCHANGE WARRANTS. CONVERSION OF
DEBENTURES
Generally no gain or loss will be recognized upon the conversion of a
Debenture into solely Common Stock (except with respect to cash received in lieu
of fractional shares received on the Debentures). However, Exchange Warrants do
not qualify for the non-recognition of gain or loss. The amount of the gain or
loss on the transaction will be equal to the difference between the cost or
basis of the Debentures surrendered and the sum of the cash (other than accrued
interest) and the fair market values of the Common Stock and Exchange Warrants
received; however, gain will be recognized (i.e. included in taxable income)
only to the extent of the cash and fair market value of the Exchange Warrants
received.
If a Debenture being converted into Common Stock is one as to which there is
accrued market discount, such accrued market discount will carry over to the
Common Stock (to the extent that such accrued market discount has not previously
been included in the holder's income) and any gain realized upon the subsequent
disposition (including a gift) of such Common Stock, to the extent of such
accrued market discount, may be taxable as ordinary interest income. (See
"Market Discount on Sale of Common Stock")
BASIS OF COMMON STOCK AND EXCHANGE WARRANTS
The basis of the Exchange Warrants received on the exchange will be equal to
their fair market value.
The basis of the Common Stock received on the exchange will equal the basis
of the Debenture in the hands of the exchanging Debentureholder, reduced by (i)
the fair market value of the Exchange Warrants received, (ii) the amount of any
money received by the exchanging Debentureholder and (iii) the amount of any
loss recognized by the exchanging Debentureholder on the exchange, and increased
by the amount of any gain recognized by the exchanging Debentureholder. In most
cases, the exchanging Debentureholder's basis in the Common Stock received on
the exchange will equal the basis of the Debenture, less the portion of such
basis allocated to the Exchange Warrants received and the portion of such basis
allocated to portion of the Debentures for which cash was received in lieu of
fractional shares.
HOLDING PERIOD OF COMMON STOCK AND EXCHANGE WARRANTS
The holding period of the Exchange Warrants for holders of the Exchange
Warrants who hold the Exchange Warrants as capital assets, for purposes of
determining whether gain or loss on the disposition of the Exchange Warrant is
long term or short term capital gain or loss, commences with the date the
Exchange Warrants are issued in connection with the Exchange Offer and
terminates on the date of disposition of the Exchange Warrant in a taxable
transaction. If the Exchange Warrant is exercised, the holding period of the
Common Stock acquired upon such exercise will include the period the
Warrantholder held the Exchange Warrant.
The holding period of the Common Stock acquired in the Exchange Offer for
holders of the Common Stock who hold the Common Stock as capital assets, for
purposes of determining whether gain or loss on the disposition of the Common
Stock acquired in the Exchange Offer is long term or short term capital gain or
loss, will be deemed to include the time period that the shareholder owned the
Debenture.
DISPOSITION OF THE COMMON STOCK AND EXCHANGE WARRANTS
On the sale, redemption or other disposition of the Common Stock acquired in
the exchange, a holder will recognize gain or loss measured by the difference
between the amount of cash and the fair market value of the property received
and the holder's tax basis in the Common Stock sold, exchanged or otherwise
disposed of. Except as set forth in the second paragraph of "Conversion of
Debentures", such gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss, provided the
Common Stock was held as a capital asset, and will be long term gain or loss if
the Common Stock were held for more than one year, including the period that the
Debenture was held.
43
<PAGE>
On the sale, redemption or other disposition of the Exchange Warrants
acquired in the exchange, other than by exercise of the Exchange Warrants and
their conversion into Common Stock, the holder will recognize gain or loss
measured by the difference between (a) the amount of cash and the fair market
value of the property received and (b) the holder's tax basis in the Exchange
Warrants sold, exchanged or otherwise disposed of. Such gain or loss will be a
capital gain or loss, provided the Exchange Warrants were held as a capital
asset, and will be long term gain or loss if the Exchange Warrants were held for
more than one year.
On the exercise of the Exchange Warrants and their conversion into Common
Stock, generally no gain or loss will be recognized by the holder of the
Exchange Warrants (except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional
shares). The holder of Exchange Warrants converted into Common Stock will
generally have the same basis for the Common Stock as for the Exchange Warrants,
less that portion of the basis of the Exchange Warrants allocable to any
fractional share for which cash is received. With respect to holders of the
Common Stock acquired on the conversion of the Exchange Warrants, who holds the
Exchange Warrants and Common Stock as capital assets, for purposes of
determining whether gain or loss on the disposition of the Common Stock acquired
through the exercise of the Exchange Warrants is long term or short term capital
gain or loss, the holding period of the Common Stock acquired on the conversion
of the Exchange Warrants will include the time period that the shareholder owned
the Exchange Warrant. Such gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss, provided
the Common Stock was held as a capital asset, and will be long term gain or loss
if the Common Stock were held for more than one year, including the period that
the Exchange Warrants were held.
MARKET DISCOUNT ON SALE OF COMMON STOCK
If the Debentureholder purchased such Debenture at a market discount, the
accrued market discount will carry over to the Common Stock acquired on the
exchange (see second paragraph of "Conversion of Debentures"). If the holder of
such Common Stock subsequently recognizes gain upon a disposition (including a
gift) of the Common Stock, the lesser of such gain (or appreciation, in the case
of a gift) or the portion of the market discount which accrued while the
Debenture was held by such holder will be treated as ordinary interest income at
the time of the disposition. The rules also provide that a subsequent holder of
any Debenture who acquired it at a market discount will be required to defer the
deduction of the interest on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase
or carry the Debenture until the Debenture (or the Common Stock for which it is
exchanged) is disposed of in a taxable transaction.
Holders of Debentures acquired at a market discount may elect to include
market discount in income as the discount accrues, either on a ratable basis or
on a constant interest rate basis. The current inclusion election, once made,
applies to all market discount obligations acquired on or after the first day of
the first taxable year to which the election applies, and may be revoked without
the consent of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). If a Debentureholder so
elected to include market discount in income, the foregoing rules with respect
to (i) the recognition of ordinary market discount income on sales or certain
other dispositions of the Common Stock acquired in exchange for the Debenture
and (ii) the deferral of interest deductions on indebtedness related to such
Debenture would not apply.
BACKUP WITHHOLDING
Under the backup withholding rules, a holder of a Debenture or Common Stock
may be subject to backup withholding at the rate of 31% with respect to interest
or dividends, respectively, paid on, and the cash proceeds of the sale,
redemption or other disposition of, the Debentures or Common Stock unless such
holder (a) is a corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories and,
when required, demonstrates that fact, or (b) provides a taxpayer identification
number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding, and
otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.
No withholding will be due on the Common Stock received for the conversion of
the Debentures. Backup withholding should not be required for the value of the
Exchange Warrants received. Backup withholding may be required for the amount
received for fractional shares, depending upon the amount so received. If
holders of Debentures have not already done so, they will be required to
complete an IRS Form W-9 in order to provide the required information to the
Company or its agent. A holder of a Debenture or Common Stock who does not
provide the Company or its
44
<PAGE>
agent with the holder's correct taxpayer identification number may be subject to
penalties imposed by the IRS.
The Company will report to the holders of the Debentures and/or Common Stock
and the IRS the amount of any "reportable payments" for each calendar year and
the amount of tax withheld, if any, with respect to payments on the Debentures
or Common Stock.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK
The following description is qualified in all respects by reference to the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation and all amendments thereto and the
Company's Bylaws, copies of which are filed as exhibits to the Registration
Statement of which this Prospectus is a part.
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, currently authorizes
40,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value and 2,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $1.00 par value. Of this total, 11,431,663 shares of Common
Stock have been issued or are issuable under options and warrants and are
outstanding at October 31, 1996. Additionally, the Company has reserved 493,350
shares of the Company's Common Stock for issuance upon the conversion of
outstanding Debentures, 431,250 shares for issuance upon exercise of the
Exchange Warrants and 69,000 shares for issuance upon the exercise of the
Co-Conversion Agent warrants. No preferred stock is currently outstanding.
COMMON STOCK
Holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to dividends when and as
declared by the Board of Directors from funds legally available therefor and
upon liquidation are entitled to share ratably in any distribution to
stockholders. All holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on
any matter coming before the stockholders for a vote, including the election of
directors. In keeping with stockholder democracy rights, Fortune's Certificate
of Incorporation permits the stockholders to remove any director or the entire
board of directors, with or without cause, upon a vote of a majority of the
outstanding shares.
All issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are validly issued, fully
paid and non-assessable, and shares issued upon conversion of the Debentures
will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. Holders of the Common
Stock do not have pre-emptive rights or other rights to subscribe for unissued
or treasury shares or securities convertible into shares. The Common Stock
received by the Debentureholders who convert, including any Common Stock
received in connection with exercising the Exchange Warrants, will not be
tradable during the first 90 days following the Closing Date.
Additionally, under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the
Company has availed itself of the provisions permitting the limitation of
liability through the indemnification of officers, directors, employees and
agents of Delaware corporations. (See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions - Limited Liability of Directors" and " Indemnification of Officers
and Directors")
PREFERRED STOCK
The Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the Board of Directors to
establish and designate the classes, series, voting powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, and such
qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the Preferred Stock as the
Board, in its sole discretion, may determine without further vote or action by
the stockholders.
The rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions or qualifications of
different series of preferred stock may differ with respect to dividend rates,
amounts payable on liquidation, voting rights, conversion rights, redemption
provisions, sinking fund provisions and other matters. The issuance of Preferred
Stock could decrease the amount
45
<PAGE>
of earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of Common Stock, or
could adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of
holders of Common Stock.
The existence of the Preferred Stock, and the power of the Board of
Directors of the Company to set its terms and issue a series of Preferred Stock
at any time without stockholder approval, could have certain anti-takeover
effects. These effects include that of making the Company a less attractive
target for a "hostile" takeover bid or rendering more difficult or discouraging
the making of a merger proposal, assumption of control through the acquisition
of a large block of Common Stock or removal of incumbent management, even if
such actions could be beneficial to the stockholders of the Company.
DEBENTURES
The Debentures were issued under an Indenture between the Company and IBJ
Schroeder Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee (the "Trustee"), and are unsecured
convertible subordinated obligations of the Company. They were issued in fully
registered form, without coupons, in denominations of $1,000 and integral
multiples thereof. The Debentures bear interest at the rate of 10-1/2% per
annum, payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1 of each year.
The Debentureholders have the right, at the holder's option, to convert any
portion of the principal amount in integral multiples of $1,000, into shares of
Common Stock at any time prior to the close of business on the business day
preceding maturity at a conversion price of $6.32 per share. The conversion
price is subject to adjustment in certain events, including: the issuance of
Common Stock as a dividend on any class of capital stock of the Company;
subdivisions and combinations of the Common Stock; the issuance to all holders
of Common Stock of certain rights or warrants to subscribe for or purchase
Common Stock at less than the current market price (as defined in the Indenture)
thereof; and, with certain exceptions, the distribution to all holders of Common
Stock of shares of its capital stock (other than shares of Common Stock),
evidences of its indebtedness, assets (excluding cash dividends or distributions
paid out of the Company's current or retained earnings) or rights or warrants
other than those mentioned above.
The payment of the principal, premium, if any, and interest on, and
redemption of, the Debentures will be subordinated in right of payment to the
extent set forth in the Indenture to the payment of the current portion of the
Senior Indebtedness of the Company, whether outstanding on the date of the
Indenture or thereafter created. The principal amount of Senior Indebtedness at
September 30, 1996 was $1,475,000. The term "Senior Indebtedness" means (a) all
indebtedness of the Company, whether outstanding on the date of the Indenture or
thereafter created, secured by assets of the Company having a value (as
determined by the Board of Directors of the Company) of more than 50% of the
outstanding principal amount of such indebtedness or $100,000, whichever is
less, (i) for borrowed money, (ii) for money borrowed by others and guaranteed,
directly or indirectly, by the Company, or (iii) constituting purchase money
indebtedness for the payment of which the Company is directly or contingently
liable, unless, in any such case, by the terms of the instrument creating or
evidencing such indebtedness it is provided that such indebtedness is not
superior in right of payment to the Debentures or to other indebtedness which is
PARI PASSU with, or subordinated to, the Debentures, and (b) any deferrals,
renewals or extensions of any such Senior Indebtedness, or securities, notes or
other evidences of Indebtedness issued in exchange for such Senior Indebtedness.
As used in the preceding sentence the term "purchase money indebtedness" means
indebtedness evidenced by a note, debenture, bond or other similar instrument
issued to or assumed for a vendor as all or part of the purchase price of such
assets acquired by the Company.
No payment on account of principal, premium, if any, or interest on, or
repurchase of, the Debentures may be made by the Company if there is a default
in the payment of principal, premium, if any, or interest with respect to any
Senior Indebtedness or if any event of default with respect to any Senior
Indebtedness, permitting the holders thereof to accelerate the maturity thereof,
shall have occurred and shall not have been cured or waived or shall not have
ceased to exist after written notice to the Company and the Trustee by any
holder of Senior Indebtedness. However, failure to pay the principal, interest
or premium, if any, on the Debentures, on the due dates set forth in the
Indenture, constitutes a default under the Debentures. Upon any acceleration of
the principal due on the Debentures or payment or distribution of assets of the
Company to creditors upon any dissolution, winding up, liquidation or
reorganization, whether voluntary or involuntary, or in bankruptcy, insolvency,
receivership or other proceedings, all principal, premium, if any, and interest
due on all Senior Indebtedness must be paid in full
46
<PAGE>
before the Holders of the Debentures are entitled to received any payment. By
reason of such subordination, in the event of insolvency, creditors of the
Company who are holders of Senior Indebtedness may recover more, ratably, than
the Holders of the Debentures, and may result in a reduction or elimination of
payments to the Holders of the Debentures.
The Indenture does not limit the Company's ability to incur Senior
Indebtedness. In addition, the Indenture does not limit the ability of the
Company's subsidiaries to incur indebtedness, which effectively is senior to the
Debentures with respect to assets of the respective subsidiary.
The Debentures are redeemable at the Company's option, as a whole or in
part, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days after notice has been mailed
to each Debentureholder at the following Redemption Prices (expressed as
percentages of the principal amount) together in each case with accrued interest
to the date fixed for redemption; PROVIDED, that if the date fixed for
redemption is an Interest Payment Date, the interest payable on such date shall
be paid to the holders of record at the close of business on the applicable
Record Date subject to the provisions of the Indenture. If redeemed during the
12-month period beginning April 1, of the following years:
REDEMPTION
YEAR PRICE
---- ----------
1996 101%
1997 100%
and thereafter at 100% of the principal amount. Upon receipt of a notice of
redemption, the Holder may convert the Debentures called for redemption until
the close of business on the Redemption Date (and if such day is not a business
day, then the immediately preceding business day).
The following are Events of Default under the Indenture: (a) failure to pay
principal of or premium, if any, on any Debenture when due, whether or not such
payment is prohibited by the subordination provisions of the Indenture; (b)
failure to pay any interest on any Debenture when due, continuing for 15 days,
whether or not such payment is prohibited by the subordination provisions of the
Indenture; (c) failure to perform any other covenant of the Company in the
Indenture, continuing for 30 days after written notice as provided in the
Indenture by the Trustee or at least 25% in aggregate principal amount at Stated
Maturity of the Debentures; (d) certain events in bankruptcy, insolvency or
reorganization. Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the
duties of the Trustee, in case an Event of Default shall occur and be
continuing, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its
rights or powers under the Indenture at the request or direction of any of the
Holders, unless such Holders shall have offered to the Trustee reasonable
indemnity. Subject to such provisions for the indemnification of the Trustee,
and other conditions set forth in the Indenture, the Holders of a majority in
aggregate principal amount of the Debentures will have the right to direct the
time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to
the Trustee or exercising any trust or power conferred on the Trustee;
otherwise, the Trustee will have the right to exercise such powers under the
Indenture and to pursue such remedies and procedures as it considers necessary
or appropriate. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the maturity of the
full amount of the Debentures may be accelerated and becomes due, subject to the
rights of the Senior Indebtedness, and subject to the notice provisions
contained in the Indenture.
If an Event of Default shall occur or be continuing, either the Trustee or
the Holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the Debentures
outstanding may accelerate the maturity of all Debentures; provided, however,
that after such acceleration, but before a judgment or decree is obtained by the
Trustee based on that default, Holders of a majority in aggregate principal
amount of Debentures outstanding may, under certain circumstances, rescind and
annul such acceleration. Further, prior to any acceleration of the maturity of
the Debentures, the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of
Debentures outstanding may waive any past default or Event of Default except (1)
default in the payment of principal, premium, if any, or interest on any of the
Debentures or (2) in respect of a covenant or provision of the Indenture which,
under Article 11, may not be modified or amended without the consent of the
holder of each outstanding Debenture.
No Debentureholder will have any right to institute any proceeding with
respect to the Indenture or for any remedy thereunder, unless such Holder shall
have previously given to the Trustee written notice of a continuing Event of
Default and unless also the Holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal
amount of the Debentures shall
47
<PAGE>
have made written request, and offered reasonable indemnity, to the Trustee to
institute such proceeding as trustee, and the Trustee shall not have received
from the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Debentures a
direction inconsistent with such request and shall have failed to institute such
proceeding within 30 days. However, such limitations do not apply to a suit
instituted by a Holder of a Debenture for the enforcement of payment of the
principal of and premium, if any, or interest on such Debenture on or after the
respective due dates expressed in such Debenture or of the right to convert such
Debenture in accordance with the Indenture. In addition to all other remedies
available to the Holders upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Holders
of Debentures representing not less than 25% of the aggregate principal amount
of the Debentures outstanding may (but are not obligated to) appoint one person
to the Company's board of directors so long as the default continues.
The Company will be required to furnish to the Trustee annually a statement
as to the performance by the Company of certain of its obligations under the
Indenture and as to any default in such performance.
Modifications and amendments of the Indenture may be made by the Company and
the Trustee with the consent of the Holders of not less than 50% in aggregate
principal amount of the Outstanding Debentures; provided, however, that no such
modification or amendment may, without the consent of the Holder of each
Outstanding Debenture affected thereby, (i) extend the fixed maturity of any
Debenture, or reduce the principal amount thereof, or reduce the rate or extend
the time of payment of interest thereon, or make the principal thereof or any
premium or interest thereon payable in any coin or currency other than that
hereinbefore provided, or reduce any premium payable on the redemption thereof
or impair the right to convert the Debentures into Common Stock on the terms set
forth in the Indenture or impair or affect the right of any Holder to institute
suit for payment thereof, without the consent of the Holder so affected, or (ii)
reduce the percentage in principal amount at Stated Maturity of the outstanding
Debentures, the consent of whose Holders is required to amend the Indenture, or
the consent of whose Holders is required for any waiver of compliance with
certain provisions hereof or of certain defaults hereunder and their
consequences provided for in this Indenture.
Without the consent of any Holders, the Company, together with the Trustee,
at any time and from time to time, may enter into one or more indentures
supplemental to the Indenture, in form satisfactory to the Trustee for any of
the following purposes: among other things, to evidence the succession of
another Person to the Company and the assumption by any such successor of the
covenants of the Company contained in the Indenture and in the Debentures; or so
to add the covenants of the Company for the benefit of the Holders, or to cure
any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provision in the Indenture which may
be inconsistent with any other provision of the Indenture, or to make any other
provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the Indenture,
provided such action shall not adversely affect the interests of the Holders of
Debentures in any material respect.
The Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Outstanding
Debentures may waive compliance by the Company with certain restrictive
provisions of the Indenture. The Holders of a majority in aggregate principal
amount of the Outstanding Debentures may waive any past default prior to any
acceleration of the maturity of the Debentures under the Indenture, except a
default in the payment of principal, premium or interest, or in respect to the
provisions referred to in (i) and (ii) above and after acceleration under
certain conditions.
EXCHANGE WARRANTS
Each Exchange Warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one share of
Common Stock for a period of three years following the Effective Date. One-half
of the Exchange Warrants received by a converting Debentureholder will have an
exercise price equal to the $4.00 per share and one-half will have an exercise
price of $5.00 per share. The Exchange Warrants are callable by the Company, at
$.05 per Warrant, upon 30 days notice, at any time after the closing price per
share of the Common Stock for ten consecutive trading days equals or exceeds
$6.00 per share. In the event the Company gives notice of its intention to
redeem, a holder would be forced either to exercise his or her Warrant within 30
days of the notice of redemption or accept the redemption price.
The Exchange Warrants will be issued in registered form under a Warrant
Agreement between the Company and the Debentureholders. The shares of Common
Stock underlying the Warrants, when issued upon exercise of a Warrant, will be
fully paid and nonassessable, and the Company will pay any transfer tax incurred
as a result of the issuance of Common Stock to the holder upon its exercise. The
Common Stock received by the
48
<PAGE>
Debentureholders who convert, including any Common Stock received in connection
with exercising the Exchange Warrants, will not be tradable during the first 90
days following the Closing Date.
The Company is not required to issue fractional shares upon the exercise of
a Warrant. The holder of a Warrant will not possess any rights as a stockholder
of the Company until such holder exercises the Warrant. A copy of the form of
Warrant Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which
this Prospectus is a part.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The principal transfer agent and registrar for the Common Stock and the
Preferred Stock offered hereby is U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, Glendale,
California. The co-transfer agent and co-registrar for such securities is Chase
Mellon Shareholder Services.
CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER DEVICES
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "Delaware Takeover
Statute") applies to Delaware corporations with a class of voting stock listed
on a national securities exchange, authorized for quotation on an inter-dealer
quotation system or held of record by 2,000 or more persons. In general, Section
203 prevents an "interested stockholder" (defined generally as any person
owning, or who is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and has owned in
the preceding three years, 15% or more of a corporation's outstanding voting
stock and affiliates and associates of such person) from engaging in a "business
combination" (as defined) with a Delaware corporation for three years following
the date such person became an interested stockholder unless (1) before such
person became an interested stockholder, the board of directors of the
corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; (2) the
interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation
outstanding at the time the transaction commenced (excluding stock held by
directors who are also officers of the corporation and by employee stock plans
that do not provide employees with the rights to determine confidentially
whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange
offer); or (3) on or subsequent to the date such person became an interested
stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board of directors of
the corporation and authorized at a meeting of stockholders by the affirmative
vote of the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock of the
corporation not owned by the interested stockholder. Under Section 203, the
restrictions described above also do not apply to certain business combinations
proposed by an interested stockholder following the announcement or notification
of one of certain extraordinary transactions involving the corporation and a
person who had not been an interested stockholder during the previous three
years or who became an interested stockholder with the approval of a majority of
the corporation's directors.
These provisions could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing
a change of control of the Company.
The Commission has indicated the use of authorized unissued shares of voting
stock could have an anti-takeover effect. In such case, various specific
disclosures to the stockholders are required. It has not been management's
intent to install an anti-takeover device nor is it expected that the Company's
authorized but unissued shares of common and preferred stock would be used for
that purpose. In addition, it is not the Company's intent to rely on any
provision of Delaware Law, including Section 203, for their anti-takeover
effects. Any business combination, as that term is used in Section 203, would be
reviewed by the Company's Board of Directors solely for its impact on the
Company.
LEGAL MATTERS
Reish & Luftman, Los Angeles, California, has passed upon the legality of
the securities offered hereby for the Company. C. Frederick Reish, a shareholder
of such firm, holds 1,000 shares of the Common Stock.
49
<PAGE>
EXPERTS
The financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 1994 and 1995 and
for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1995, and the
statements of revenues and direct operating expenses of the oil and gas property
interests acquired from PetroFina S.A. for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 1994 have been included herein and in the Registration
Statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent
certified public accountants, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority
of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The report of KPMG Peat
Marwick LLP covering the December 31, 1995 financial statements of the Company
refers to the adoption of the provisions of statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," as of December 31, 1995.
The information appearing herein with respect to net proved oil and gas
reserves of the Company at December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, was estimated by
Huddleston & Co., Inc., independent petroleum engineers, and at December 31,
1993 and 1994 was estimated by Sherwin D. Yoelin, petroleum engineer, and is
included herein on the authority of such engineers as experts in petroleum
engineering.
GLOSSARY
BBL. "Bbl" means barrel. "Mbbl" means thousand barrels.
"MMBbl" means million barrels.
BOE. "BOE" means barrel of oil equivalent, which are
determined using the ratio of one barrel of crude
oil, condensate or natural gas liquids to six Mcf of
natural gas so that six Mcf of natural gas is
referred to as one barrel of oil equivalent or
"BOE". "MBOE" means thousands of barrels of oil
equivalent. "MMBOE" means millions of barrels of oil
equivalent.
BCF. "Bcf" means billion cubic feet.
GAS WELL. A gas well is a well drilled for producing only gas
as its primary product and not producing oil or
condensate.
GROSS ACRES OR WELLS. "Gross Acres or Wells" are the total acres or wells,
as the case may be, in which an entity has an
interest, either directly or through an affiliate.
MCF. "Mcf" means thousand cubic feet. "Mmcf" means
million cubic feet.
MMBTU. One Million British Thermal Units. A British Thermal
Unit is the amount of heat needed to raise the
temperature of one pound of water one degree
Fahrenheit.
NET ACRES OR WELLS. A party's "net acres" or "net wells" are calculated
by multiplying the number of gross acres or gross
wells in which that party has an interest by the
fractional interest of the party in each such acre
or well.
PRODUCING PROPERTIES
OR RESERVES. Producing Reserves are Proved Developed Reserves
expected to be produced from existing completion
intervals now open for production in existing wells.
A Producing Property is a property to which
Producing Reserves have been assigned by an
independent petroleum engineer.
50
<PAGE>
PROVED DEVELOPED
RESERVES. "Proved Developed Reserves" are Proved Reserves
which can be expected to be recovered through
existing wells with existing equipment and operating
methods.
PROVED RESERVES. "Proved Reserves" are the estimated quantities of
crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which
geological and engineering data demonstrate with
reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future
years from known oil and gas reservoirs under
existing economic and operating conditions, that is,
on the basis of prices and costs as of the date the
estimate is made and any price changes provided for
by existing conditions.
PROVED UNDEVELOPED
RESERVES. "Proved Undeveloped Reserves" are Proved Reserves
which can be expected to be recovered from new wells
on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a
relatively major expenditure is required for
recompletion. The offset units containing the
proved-undeveloped reserves are reasonably certain
of commercial production when drilled.
PROVED DEVELOPED
PRODUCING RESERVES
Proved Developed Producing Reserves are defined as
those that are recoverable from completion intervals
in existing wells that are currently open and
delivering commercial volumes of hydrocarbons to
market.
PROVED DEVELOPED
NON-PRODUCING RESERVES Proved Developed Non-Producing Reserves are defined
as those that are recoverable from zones behind
cemented casing in existing wells which will require
additional completion work or a future recompletion
prior to the start of production. The cost of making
such oil reserves available for production is
insignificant relative to the volume of reserves
expected to be recovered from the planned
recompletion programs. The reserves are supported by
actual production performance from wells completed
in the prospective sands elsewhere in the local
area.
RESERVES. "Reserves" means crude oil and natural gas,
condensate and natural gas liquids, which are net of
leasehold burdens, are stated on a net revenue
interest basis, and are found to be commercially
recoverable.
ROYALTY INTEREST. A "Royalty Interest" is an interest in an oil and
gas property entitling the owner to a share of oil
and gas production (or the proceeds of the sale
thereof) free of the costs of production.
SEC METHOD. The SEC method is a method of determining the
present value of proved reserves. Under the SEC
method, the future net revenues from proved reserves
are estimated assuming that oil and gas prices and
production costs remain constant. The resulting
stream of revenues is then discounted at the rate of
10% per year to obtain a present value.
UNDEVELOPED ACREAGE. "Undeveloped Acreage" is oil and gas acreage
(including, in applicable instances, rights in one
or more horizons which may be penetrated by existing
well bores, but which have not been tested) to which
Proved Reserves have not been assigned by
independent petroleum engineers.
WORKING INTEREST. A "Working Interest" is the operating interest under
an Oil and Gas Lease which gives the owner the right
to drill, produce and conduct operating activities
on the property and a share of production, subject
to all royalties, overriding royalties and other
burdens and to all costs of exploration, development
and operations and all risks in connection
therewith.
51
<PAGE>
IN THIS PROSPECTUS, NATURAL GAS VOLUMES ARE STATED AT THE LEGAL PRESSURE
BASE OF THE STATE OR AREA IN WHICH THE RESERVES ARE LOCATED AT 60 DEGREES
FAHRENHEIT
52
<PAGE>
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
Independent Auditors' Report - KPMG Peat Marwick LLP........................F-2
Balance Sheets - December 31, 1994 and December 31, 1995....................F-3
Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995.........................................F-5
Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995..........................................F-6
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995..........................................F-7
Notes to Financial Statements...............................................F-8
Balance Sheets - September 30, 1996 (unaudited) and
December 31, 1995 (audited) ..............................................F-23
Statements of Operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 1995 and 1996 (unaudited)...................................F-24
Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the year
ended December 31, 1995 and nine months
ended September 30, 1996 (unaudited)......................................F-25
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 1995 and 1996 (unaudited)...................................F-26
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)...................................F-27
Independent Auditors' Report - KPMG Peat Marwick LLP........................F-30
Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses
Acquired from PetroFina S.A. for the years ended
December 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994 (audited) and for the nine
months ended September 30, 1994 and 1995 (unaudited)........................F-31
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Direct
Operating Expenses Acquired from PetroFina S.A..............................F-32
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information..........................F-35
Unaudited Notes to Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statement.........F-36
F-1
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Fortune Petroleum Corporation:
We have audited the financial statements of Fortune Petroleum Corporation
as listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Fortune Petroleum
Corporation as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December
31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company adopted
the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of," as of December 31, 1995.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
March 15, 1996
Houston, Texas
F-2
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
1994 1995
------------ ------------
CURRENT ASSETS:
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents .................... $ 398,000 $ 1,888,000
Accounts receivable .......................... 550,000 1,035,000
Oil and gas properties
held for sale .............................. -- 1,180,000
Prepaid expenses and oil inventory ........... 114,000 127,000
------------ ------------
Total Current Assets ......................... 1,062,000 4,230,000
------------ ------------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Oil and gas properties, accounted for
using the successful efforts method ........ 17,912,000 18,960,000
Automotive, office and other ................. 330,000 227,000
------------ ------------
18,242,000 19,187,000
Less--accumulated depletion, depreciation
and amortization ........................... (8,253,000) (7,821,000)
------------ ------------
9,989,000 11,366,000
------------ ------------
OTHER ASSETS:
Materials, supplies and other deferred charges 269,000 62,000
Deferred credit facility costs (net of
accumulated amortization of $39,000) ....... 114,000 --
Bond issuance costs (net of
accumulated amortization of $122,000
and $180,000) .............................. 167,000 109,000
Restricted cash .............................. -- 3,230,000
------------ ------------
550,000 3,401,000
------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS ....................................... $ 11,601,000 $ 18,997,000
============ ============
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-3
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
DECEMBER 31,
1994 1995
------------ ------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current portion of long term debt ..... $ 4,688,000 $ 3,208,000
Accounts payable ...................... 393,000 280,000
Accrued expenses ...................... 78,000 96,000
Executive severance payable ........... 96,000 --
Royalties and working interests payable 53,000 94,000
Accrued interest ...................... 130,000 119,000
Notes payable to officers, directors
and stockholders .................... 200,000 --
------------ ------------
Total Current Liabilities .......... 5,638,000 3,797,000
------------ ------------
NOTES PAYABLE TO OFFICERS,
DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS ................ 550,000 --
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion ...... 1,685,000 1,689,000
EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAYABLE ................. 63,000 --
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value:
Authorized--2,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding-- None ....... -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value
Authorized--40,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--
2,644,032 and 11,139,709 shares
at December 31, 1994 and 1995,
respectively ........................ 26,000 111,000
Capital in excess of par value ........ 11,253,000 27,228,000
Accumulated deficit ................... (7,614,000) (13,828,000)
------------ ------------
NET STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY .................... 3,665,000 13,511,000
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY .. $ 11,601,000 $ 18,997,000
============ ============
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-4
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 1994 1995
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Sales of oil and gas, net of
royalties ......................... $ 2,762,000 $ 3,339,000 $ 2,959,000
Other income ........................ 72,000 58,000 234,000
----------- ----------- -----------
2,834,000 3,397,000 3,193,000
DIRECT PRODUCTION EXPENSES ................ 946,000 1,090,000 1,514,000
----------- ----------- -----------
REVENUES IN EXCESS OF DIRECT
PRODUCTION EXPENSES ..................... 1,888,000 2,307,000 1,679,000
----------- ----------- -----------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Provision for depletion, depreciation
and amortization .................. 1,719,000 2,070,000 1,809,000
Geological and geophysical costs .... -- -- 418,000
General and administrative expenses . 791,000 1,020,000 1,212,000
Abandoned leasehold costs ........... 71,000 249,000 56,000
Dry hole costs ...................... -- 195,000 998,000
Gain on sale of assets .............. (133,000) -- --
Interest expense .................... 311,000 460,000 870,000
Reserve for doubtful debt ........... 101,000 -- --
Executive severance expense ......... -- 225,000 --
Impairment to oil and gas properties 2,682,000 1,031,000 2,530,000
----------- ----------- -----------
5,542,000 5,250,000 7,893,000
----------- ----------- -----------
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES ........................ (3,654,000) (2,943,000) (6,214,000)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES ................ -- -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
NET LOSS .................................. (3,654,000) (2,943,000) (6,214,000)
=========== =========== ===========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING ............... 1,772,739 2,638,672 6,555,875
=========== =========== ===========
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE ................. $ (2.06) $ (1.12) $ (0.95)
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-5
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CAPITAL IN STOCK-
COMMON STOCK EXCESS OF ACCUMULATED HOLDERS'
SHARES AMOUNT PAR VALUE DEFICIT EQUITY
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, January 1, 1993 .............. 796,460 $ 8,000 $ 5,162,000 $ (1,017,000) $ 4,153,000
=========== ======== ============ ============ ============
Common stock returned to
treasury ............................ (269) -- (2,000) -- (2,000)
Common stock issued for public
offering ............................ 1,800,000 18,000 5,416,000 -- 5,434,000
Warrants issued for public
offering ............................ -- -- 444,000 -- 444,000
Warrants issued for payment of services -- -- 111,000 -- 111,000
Common stock issued for
exercise of stock options ........... 9,376 -- 25,000 -- 25,000
Common stock issued for
payment of interest ................. 22,365 -- 86,000 -- 86,000
Common stock issued for
directors' fees ..................... 5,539 -- 16,000 -- 16,000
Net loss .............................. -- -- -- (3,654,000) (3,654,000)
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE, December 31, 1993 ............ 2,633,471 $ 26,000 $ 11,258,000 $ (4,671,000) $ 6,613,000
=========== ======== ============ ============ ============
Common stock returned
to treasury ......................... (80) -- (2,000) -- (2,000)
Adjustment to proceeds
for 1993 public offering ............ -- -- (29,000) -- (29,000)
Common stock issued for
exercise of stock options ........... 4,688 -- 12,000 -- 12,000
Common stock issued for
directors' fees ..................... 5,953 -- 14,000 -- 14,000
Net loss .............................. -- -- -- (2,943,000) (2,943,000)
-------- ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE, December 31, 1994 ............ 2,644,032 $ 26,000 $ 11,253,000 $ (7,614,000) $ 3,665,000
=========== ======== ============ ============ ============
Common stock returned
to treasury ......................... (12) -- -- -- --
Common stock issued for
exercise of stock options ........... 202,481 2,000 500,000 -- 502,000
Common stock issued for
directors fees ...................... 14,445 -- 39,000 -- 39,000
Common stock issued for
stock offerings ..................... 6,569,117 65,000 11,729,000 -- 11,794,000
Common stock issued for
merger .............................. 1,200,000 12,000 2,480,000 -- 2,492,000
Common stock and warrants issued
for payment of investment
banking services .................... 100,000 2,000 263,000 -- 265,000
Common stock issued for
warrant conversion .................. 115,479 1,000 392,000 -- 393,000
Common stock issued for
note conversion ..................... 294,167 3,000 572,000 -- 575,000
Net loss .............................. -- -- -- (6,214,000) (6,214,000)
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE, December 31, 1995 ............ 11,139,709 $111,000 $ 27,228,000 $(13,828,000) $ 13,511,000
=========== ======== ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-6
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995
----------- ----------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net loss ................................................................. $(3,654,000) $(2,943,000) $ (6,214,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Common stock issued for interest expense ............................... 86,000 -- --
Common stock issued for directors' fees,
compensation and consulting fees ....................................... 16,000 14,000 39,000
Depletion, depreciation and amortization ............................... 1,719,000 2,070,000 1,809,000
Abandoned leasehold and dry hole costs ................................. -- 444,000 1,054,000
Gain on disposition of assets .......................................... (62,000) -- --
Amortization of deferred financing cost ................................ -- -- 172,000
Impairment of oil and gas assets ....................................... 2,682,000 1,031,000 2,530,000
Reserve for doubtful debt .............................................. 101,000 -- --
Provision for executive severance ...................................... -- 225,000 (17,000)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable .................................................... (263,000) 24,000 (485,000)
Prepaids and oil inventory ............................................. 46,000 (45,000) (13,000)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses .................................. 375,000 (202,000) (95,000)
Payment of executive severance ......................................... -- (66,000) (111,000)
Royalties and working interest payable ................................. (28,000) (13,000) 41,000
Accrued interest ....................................................... 43,000 31,000 (11,000)
Materials, supplies and other .......................................... (81,000) (79,000) 189,000
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ...................... 980,000 491,000 (1,112,000)
----------- ----------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Expenditure for oil and gas properties ................................... (6,746,000) (4,035,000) (4,431,000)
Expenditures to abandon properties and dry hole costs .................... -- (230,000) (855,000)
Restricted cash invested ................................................. -- -- (3,230,000)
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment ........................... 292,000 8,000 --
Expenditures for other property and equipment ............................ (4,000) (30,000) 16,000
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash used in investing activities .................................... (6,458,000) (4,287,000) (8,500,000)
----------- ----------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt ................................. -- 4,680,000 --
Proceeds from notes to stockholders ...................................... -- 750,000 --
Repayment of long term debt .............................................. (571,000) (1,326,000) (1,651,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock ................................... 6,336,000 12,000 15,220,000
Expenditures for offering costs .......................................... (322,000) (29,000) (2,467,000)
Common stock repurchase .................................................. (2,000) (2,000) --
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities ................................ 5,441,000 4,085,000 11,102,000
----------- ----------- ------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ......................................................... (37,000) 289,000 1,490,000
----------- ----------- ------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD ............................... 146,000 109,000 398,000
----------- ----------- ------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD ..................................... $ 109,000 $ 398,000 $ 1,888,000
=========== =========== ============
Supplemental information:
Interest paid in cash .................................................... $ 225,000 $ 400,000 $ 692,000
Common Stock issued or issuable as directors' fees ....................... 16,000 14,000 39,000
Common Stock issued or issuable for interest paid ........................ 86,000 -- --
Warrants issued for public offering ...................................... 444,000 -- --
Warrants issued for public offering expenses ............................. 111,000 -- --
Common stock issued for payment of executive severance ................... -- -- 43,000
Common stock issued to acquire LEX ....................................... -- -- 2,492,000
Common stock and warrants issued for payment of investment banking fees- . -- 265,000
Common stock issued for conversion of debt ............................... -- -- 575,000
Value of California assets transferred to oil and gas assets held for sale -- -- 1,180,000
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-7
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Fortune Petroleum Corporation (Fortune or the Company), which does
business in Texas and Louisiana as Fortune Natural Resources Corporation, is an
independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, production and
exploration of oil and gas, primarily offshore Louisiana, the Texas and
Louisiana Gulf Coast and New Mexico.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of
the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the
reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Oil Inventory
Oil inventory is stated at approximate fair market value. Market value is
determined based on current well head price of oil less selling and delivery
costs.
Property and Equipment
Oil and gas properties are accounted for using the successful efforts
method. Costs of acquiring non-producing acreage, drilling development wells and
successful exploration wells are capitalized. All other exploratory expenses are
charged to operations as incurred. The carrying value of oil and gas properties
is evaluated in relation to the estimated future net revenues based on reserve
report estimates (See: "Reserve Impairment" below). Depletion, depreciation and
amortization are calculated using the unit-of-production method. Oil and gas
reserve quantities are based on a reserve report by an independent petroleum
engineer.
Automotive, office and other property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over an estimated future
service life of five years.
Materials and Supplies
Materials and supplies are stated at the lower of identified actual cost
or replacement cost.
F-8
<PAGE>
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method for recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred taxes are recognized for future
tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The effect on deferred
taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the change
occurs.
Bond Issuance Costs
Bond issuance costs are being amortized using the straight line method
over the 5 year life of the related debt.
RESERVE IMPAIRMENT
In December 1995, $1.2 million of the Company's oil and gas assets were
reclassified as oil and gas property held for sale as of December 31, 1995,
since such assets are being sold during 1996. During 1993, 1994 and 1995 these
properties did not have a significant impact on net income. These assets were
recorded at their estimated realizable value at December 31, 1995 in accordance
with Statement 121 as is discussed below.
Prior to December 31, 1995, the Company evaluated the carrying cost of its
oil and gas properties for impairment by performing a ceiling test based on the
aggregate present value of future net revenues, discounted at ten percent. Based
upon such evaluation, the Company recorded impairments of $1,031,000 and
$2,682,000 in 1994 and 1993, respectively. In March 1995, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement 121, "Accounting for the
impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of"
("Statement 121"). This statement requires that an impairment loss be recognized
when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of the estimated future
cash flow (undiscounted) of the assets. Under Statement 121, the Company
reviewed the impairment of proved oil and gas properties on a depletable unit
basis. For each depletable unit determined to be impaired, an impairment loss
equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the
depletable unit was recognized. Fair value, on a depletable unit basis, was
estimated to be the present value of expected future cash flows computed by
applying estimated future oil and gas prices, as determined by management, to
estimated future production of oil and gas reserves over the economic lives of
the reserves. As a result of the Company's election to adopt Statement 121 on
December 31, 1995, a provision of $2,530,000 was charged against operations
during 1995.
The Company makes periodic assessments of existing unproved properties to
determine whether they have been impaired. Such assessment is made on a
property-by-property basis. If the results of the assessment indicate
impairment, the Company recognizes the impairment at the time the assessment is
made. Based on the most recent assessment, the Company believes that no
impairment to unproved properties exists at December 31, 1995.
RECLASSIFICATION
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1994 and 1993 amounts to
conform with the current year presentation.
(2) RESTRICTED CASH
Under the terms of the Company's exploration agreement with Zydeco
Exploration, Inc., (See Note 3) Fortune had contributed $4,850,000 in cash as of
December 31, 1995 for its share of a predetermined lease acquisition, seismic
acquisition and seismic processing cost budget. At December 31, 1995,
approximately $1,620,000 of that budget had been expended, leaving $3,230,000 of
restricted cash available for future budgeted expenditures. The Company has
signature authority (jointly with Zydeco) on the bank account containing these
funds, is the recipient of interest from the bank account and must jointly
approve expenditures from the account.
(3) ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
F-9
<PAGE>
SOUTH TIMBALIER BLOCK 76
On December 11, 1995, Fortune acquired for $2.2 million a 16-2/3% working
interest (12-1/2% net revenue interest) in a 5,000 acre producing oil and gas
property offshore Louisiana from PetroFina, Inc. The property, South Timbalier
Block 76 (and referred to herein as the "South Timbalier Block"), includes a
producing well, drilling and production platform and transmission line. The
acquisition has an effective date for oil and gas purposes of June 1, 1995, with
Fortune being entitled to receive the net cash flow from the well to its
interest from that date; the effective date for financial reporting purposes is
November 1, 1995. During March 1996, the Company's interest has been
subsequently reduced to a 12-1/2% working interest (9-3/8% revenue interest) as
the result of the exercise by Pendragon Resources, LLC of an option to acquire
the balance of the Company's interest. (See Note 13.)
The following pro forma unaudited results reflect the years ended December
31, 1994 and 1995 as if the South Timbalier Block 76 acquisition had occurred,
and the option had been exercised, and the common stock issued in the
acquisition of LEX was issued (See below and note 9), as of January 1, 1994:
Pro Forma Information
For the Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
1994 1995
--------------- -----------
Revenues ............................. $ 4,596,000 $ 4,451,000
=============== ===========
Net Loss ............................. $ (2,554,000) $(5,654,000)
=============== ===========
Net Loss Per Common Share ............ $ (.49) $ (.73)
=============== ===========
LAGNIAPPE EXPLORATION CORPORATION/ZYDECO EXPLORATION
On May 12, 1995, Fortune acquired Lagniappe Exploration, Inc. ("LEX")
which had previously entered into the exploration agreement with Zydeco. The
Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity securities of LEX in
exchange for 1.2 million shares of Fortune Petroleum Common Stock and 1.2
million warrants. The acquisition has been recorded using the purchase method of
accounting effective May 12, 1995. Upon acquisition, LEX became a wholly-owner
subsidiary of the Company. The market value of the shares, when issued, was
$2,572,000. Prior to the Company's acquisition, LEX did not have day-to-day
operations, the only material asset was its right to participate in the Zydeco
3D Venture. Under the exploration agreement with Zydeco, Fortune has acquired a
50% interest in each of 19 seismically defined oil and gas projects identified
by Zydeco using advanced 3D seismic imaging, visualization and comprehensive
well log analyses in exchange for funding a budget of $4,850,000 for leasehold
acquisition and seismic costs. These 19 Zydeco Projects are primarily located in
geological trends in the "Transition Zone" and the "Timbalier Trench" areas of
the Gulf Coast of Louisiana, where there have been discoveries of crude oil and
natural gas reserves.
The Company does not currently expect to retain a working interest of more
than 25%, except in certain circumstances, in each well drilled on the Zydeco
Projects and intends to "farmout" its remaining interest to other oil companies
on a "promoted" basis. Fortune may retain larger or smaller working interests in
certain projects depending upon capital availability and other factors. Under a
farmout arrangement, the Company would be relieved of its obligation to pay, or
could recover already paid, acquisition and exploration costs but would wind up
with a smaller interest in any given prospect. The Company also has a right
under the Zydeco 3D Venture to "farmout" a portion or all of its interest in
each prospect to Zydeco under a put arrangement in the exploration agreement.
Zydeco has an identical right to farmout to Fortune.
Zydeco and Fortune entered into a farmout of the Polaris Project to
Southern Gas Company of Delaware ("Southern") on May 31, 1995. Under the terms
of the farmout, Southern paid Zydeco and Fortune an aggregate of $100,000 in
exchange for 100% of the working interest in the Project. Zydeco and Fortune
also retained a 6.166% overriding royalty interest of which 4.166% is
convertible to a 12-1/2% working interest after Southern receives payout from a
completed well. Zydeco and Fortune would also receive a payment out of
production of approximately $32,500. Southern is required to commence drilling a
well on the Project on or before March 31, 1996 and will earn an
F-10
<PAGE>
interest in the Project to a depth of 100 feet below the deepest depth drilled
if Southern completes a commercially productive well. This means that Zydeco and
Fortune will retain the right to explore the Project at deeper depths. No
assurance can be given that Southern will drill the required well or that any
drilling conducted by Southern will be successful.
ENRE CORPORATION
On June 24, 1994, the Company acquired a 25% interest in EnRe-l LLC, a
company formed to develop and explore for oil and gas lands held under certain
Jicarilla Apache mineral development agreements in Rio Arriba County, New
Mexico. The net acquisition price was $1,674,000, and the effective date of the
transaction using the purchase method of accounting was June 1, 1994. As a
result of the acquisition, the Company has effective non-operating working
interests ranging from 21.5625% to 25% in 70,000 producing, development and
exploratory acres.
LAROCO, LLP
On February 8, 1994, the Company completed an acquisition of a 50% working
interest in a 3,689 acre lease in the La Rosa Natural Gas Field in Refugio
County, Texas from Brooklyn Union Exploration Company, Inc. for $760,000. The
effective date of the transaction using the purchase method of accounting was
February 1, 1994.
MICHAEL PETROLEUM, ET AL.
On October 5, 1993, the Company concluded the acquisition from Michael
Petroleum Corporation, Brazos Resources, Inc., Pioneer Drilling Company and
Endowment Energy Partners of certain interests in two producing natural gas
fields in Webb County, Texas. The funding was provided by substantially all of
the net proceeds from the public offering which closed on the same date (See
Note 7). The transaction was accounted for as a purchase as of July 1, 1993 with
a net acquisition price of $6,457,000 and 195,000 common stock purchase warrants
exercisable at $3.88, to expire on June 30, 1996 and which have been transferred
to another party.
F-11
<PAGE>
(4) OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES AND OPERATIONS - UNAUDITED
Capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities and related
accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization at December 31, 1993, 1994
and 1995 were as follows:
1993 1994 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
Capitalized costs of oil
and gas properties ........... $ 14,302,000 $ 17,912,000 $ 18,960,000
Less accumulated depletion,
depreciation and amortization (5,282,000) (7,193,000) (7,629,000)
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 9,020,000 $ 10,719,000 $ 11,331,000
============ ============ ============
Of the above capitalized costs, the amount representing unproved
properties was $5,939,000, $1,036,000 and $440,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.
Costs incurred in oil and gas producing activities were as follows:
1993 1994 1995
---------- ---------- ----------
Property acquisition ........... $ 57,000 $ 511,000 $6,788,000
Exploration .................... -- 231,000 576,000
Development .................... 289,000 541,000 498,000
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 346,000 $1,283,000 $7,862,000
========== ========== ==========
The results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the
years ended December 31, 1993, 1994 and 1995, are as follows:
1993 1994 1995
------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Revenues from oil and gas
producing activities:
Sales to unaffiliated parties ................. $ 2,762 $ 3,339 $ 2,959
------- ------- -------
Production and other taxes .................... 946 1,090 1,514
Depreciation, depletion and amorti-
zation ...................................... 1,645 1,904 1,774
Exploration expenses .......................... 71 444 1,472
Impairment to oil and gas reserves ............ 2,682 1,031 2,530
Other ......................................... 11 -- --
------- ------- -------
Total expenses ................................ 5,355 4,469 7,290
------- ------- -------
Pretax loss from producing activities ......... (2,593) (1,130) (4,331)
Income tax (expense) benefit .................. -- -- --
------- ------- -------
Results of oil and gas producing activities
(excluding corporate overhead and
interest costs) .............................. $(2,593) $(1,130) $(4,331)
======= ======= =======
F-12
<PAGE>
5) LONG TERM DEBT
A summary of long-term debt follows:
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1994 1995
---------- ----------
Convertible Subordinated Debentures
of $1,725,000 (net of discount of
$103,000 and $88,000) due December
31, 1997, including interest of 10-1/2%
per annum paid semi-annually ................... $1,653,000 $1,668,000
Bank One credit facility due April 1, 1997
including interest at 1-1/2% over Bank
One, Texas, NA's prime rate payable monthly .... 4,680,000 3,200,000
Other debt with interest ranging from 0%
to 9-1/4% per annum due through 1998 ........... 40,000 29,000
---------- ----------
Total long-term debt ............................... 6,373,000 4,897,000
Less current installments .......................... 4,688,000 3,208,000
---------- ----------
Long-term debt, excluding current installments ..... $1,685,000 $1,689,000
========== ==========
The 10-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due December 31, 1997 bear
an effective interest rate of 12.13% and were convertible into shares of the
Company's common stock, after April 1, 1994, at a conversion price of $6.32 per
share or 158 shares per Debenture. Therefore, if all $1,725,000 were converted
the number of the Company's common shares then outstanding would increase by
272,981 shares.
The Company has a $10,000,000 credit facility with Bank One under which it
has the ability to borrow amounts up to an available borrowing base as defined
in the credit agreement. This borrowing base was $3,200,000 at December 31,
1995. The credit facility contains various financial covenants, is secured by
all of the Company's oil and gas properties and currently requires monthly
principal reduction payments of $75,000.
At December 31, 1995, the Company was not in compliance with its cash flow
coverage ratio covenant. Under the terms of credit facility agreement the bank
has the right to demand repayment of the entire loan balance in the event of
covenant defaults. The Company is currently in discussions with Bank One
regarding breach of this covenant, however, it has obtained a waiver of this
covenant from the bank as of December 31, 1995. As of February 29, 1996, the
Company has repaid Bank One $1,100,000 with funds primarily from the proceeds of
the sale of its California properties. The outstanding balance remaining against
the Bank One credit facility is $1,925,000 after the February 29, 1996 payment.
The Company's maturities of long-term debt over the next three years are
as follows:
YEAR LONG-TERM DEBT MATURITY
- ---- -----------------------
1996 ............................................... $3,208,000
1997 ............................................... 1,673,000
1998 ............................................... 16,000
----------
$4,897,000
==========
(6) INCOME TAXES
No provision for income taxes was required for the years ended December
31, 1993, 1994 and 1995. Deferred taxes consist of the following:
Deferred tax assets: 1994 1995
---------- ----------
Net operating loss carryforwards ............. $1,762,000 $2,936,000
Oil and Gas Properties difference
in accumulated depletion .................... 1,634,000 1,688,000
---------- ----------
3,396,000 4,624,000
Less valuation allowance (100%) .............. 3,396,000 4,624,000
---------- ----------
Net deferred taxes ........................... $ 0 $ 0
========== ==========
F-13
<PAGE>
At December 31, 1995, the Company estimates it had cumulative net
operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax purposes of $8,634,000 which
is significantly restricted under I.R.C. 382 and which is available to offset
future Federal taxable income, if any, with various expirations through 2008.
The Company is uncertain as to the recoverability of the above deferred tax
assets and has therefore applied a 100% valuation allowance.
The Company has available IRC Section 29 Tax Credits that may be used to
reduce or eliminate any corporate through the year 2001. It is uncertain at this
time to what extent the Company will be able to utilize these federal tax
credits, as their utilization is dependent upon the amount, if any, of future
federal income tax incurred, after application of the Company's net operating
loss carryforwards.
(7) STOCK OFFERINGS
On June 27, 1995, the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement to
sell 4.1 million shares of the Company's common stock at $2.00 per share. On
July 3, 1995, the underwriters advised the Company they were exercising their
right to purchase an additional 500,000 shares of common stock of the Company at
$2.00 per share under the overallotment terms of the Underwriting Agreement.
Proceeds of approximately $8.1 million, net of offering fees and expenses were
received from the sale of the shares.
On December 15, 1995, the Company closed a private placement of 1,321,117
shares of Common Stock at a price of $3.22 per share. Net proceeds of
approximately $3.3 million were received for the sale of these shares. The
shares were sold subject to certain "reset" provisions pursuant to which the
purchasers could receive additional shares if the price of the Common Stock were
to drop below the purchase price during certain calculation periods. As a result
of the recent decline in the price of the Common Stock, the Company may be
required to issue a substantial number of additional shares. However, the
Company is currently investigating certain alleged irregularities in the trading
in its Common Stock and is uncertain whether it will be required to issue
additional shares. Were it required to issue such shares as of the date hereof
the number of additional shares would be approximately 1,266,000. In February
1995, the Company closed a previous private placement of 648,000 shares of
Common Stock. The proceeds were used to fund the initial contribution to the
Zydeco venture.
(8) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company has an employment agreement with its president and chief
executive officer that provides for an annual salary of $150,000 through
December 31, 1997, and is subject to renewal upon expiration. Upon termination
of the employment agreement, the president and chief executive officer has a
two-year consulting agreement at 40% of his annual salary.
The Company leases certain office space under a non-cancelable operating lease.
Rental Expense under the office lease for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993 was $53,000, $45,000 and $43,000, respectively.
Minimum future lease payments under the non-cancelable lease are as
follows:
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
1996 ............................................... $ 49,000
1997 ............................................... $ 84,000
1998 ............................................... $ 84,000
1999 ............................................... $ 84,000
2000 ............................................... $ 84,000
Thereafter ............................................ $ 35,000
--------
$420,000
========
F-14
<PAGE>
On March 14, 1995, Fortune was served with a lawsuit filed in the District
Court of Bexar County, Texas by EnRe Corporation, in which EnRe, as operator of
the Company's New Mexico properties, seeks recovery of approximately $438,000
allegedly owed by Fortune for the drilling of certain wells on such properties.
The lawsuit is the result of disputes between the parties regarding the manner
in which EnRe has conducted operations on the property and the proper
interpretation of the operating agreement among the interest owners on the
property. Fortune management believes that EnRe has operated the property in a
negligent manner, causing loss to Fortune and the other interest owners. In
addition, management believes that the Company was permitted under the terms of
the operating agreement to elect not to participate in the drilling operations
for which EnRe sought payment. On March 24, 1995, Fortune answered EnRe's
lawsuit and filed a counterclaim against EnRe for an undeterminable amount for
damages suffered by Fortune for EnRe's actions.
On March 30, 1995, a partial settlement was reached as to payment by
Fortune of undisputed well development costs in exchange for EnRe's co-operation
in complying with provisions of the operating agreement to report operating
information to Fortune on a timely basis. As of April 24, 1995, the Company had
paid all well development costs which it believed to be undisputed, totaling
$174,499.
In the opinion of management, Fortune has valid defenses to all claims
still in dispute made by EnRe. On March 11, 1996 the Company was advised that
its proposal to EnRe to dismiss its litigation in exchange for the Company's
dismissal of its counterclaim was accepted by EnRe pending the completion of the
appropriate settlement documents.
(9) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As part of the relocation of Fortune Petroleum Corporation's headquarters
to Houston, Texas, the Company provided Tyrone J. Fairbanks, its President and
Chief Executive Officer, with an incentive relocation package to facilitate his
move to Texas. The package consisted of a payment by the Company of Mr.
Fairbanks' moving expenses, a non-recourse, unsecured loan in the amount of
$80,000 bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum, with $20,000 of such loan
forgiven in each of four consecutive years beginning in 1996, provided Mr.
Fairbanks is still employed by the Company or has been terminated by the Company
without cause, and a secured recourse loan in the amount of $70,000 also bearing
interest at the rate of 6% per annum, payable interest only for two years with a
$35,000 principal payment due on the second anniversary of the loan and all
remaining principal and interest due on the third anniversary of the loan. The
Company also extended the term of Mr. Fairbanks' employment contract through
December 31, 1997.
In connection with the acquisition of LEX, Fortune paid Messrs. William D.
Forster and BSR Investments, the LEX stockholders, an aggregate of 1,200,000
shares of Common Stock and 1,200,000 five year stock purchase warrants
exercisable at $4.75 per share. A portion of such shares and warrants remain in
escrow pending the resolution of a dispute which has arisen among the former LEX
stockholders and others regarding who is entitled to the shares of Common Stock
and stock purchase warrants issued by Fortune at the closing of the LEX
acquisition.
In initially entering into the LEX acquisition, Fortune was advised that
the stockholders of LEX included William D. Forster, BSR Investments, ("BSR"), a
corporation owned by members of the family of Mr. Charif Souki (Souki) and
Ensign Financial Group Limited, a British Virgin Islands corporation ("Ensign").
In preparing for the closing of the acquisition, however, Fortune was advised
that the only stockholders of LEX were Forster and BSR and that they were the
only persons or entities entitled to vote on the merger of LEX with Fortune's
subsidiary. Fortune obtained a written representation from Forster and BSR to
this effect and received a legal opinion from LEX's counsel confirming these
representations and confirming that all corporate action on the part of LEX
necessary to authorize the merger had occurred.
F-15
<PAGE>
On May 11, 1995, Baytree Associates, Inc. ("Baytree") and Ensign commenced
litigation in the Supreme Court of New York against Forster, BSR, Souki (the son
of Samyr Souki, president of BSR), LEX and Fortune seeking to enjoin the closing
of the LEX acquisition by Fortune on the grounds that Ensign was entitled to a
one-third interest in the proceeds of the transaction, namely the Common Stock
and warrants to be issued by Fortune. Baytree also sought $1,000,000 in damages
from Fortune for allegedly providing investment banking services to Fortune in
connection with the Regulation S offering made by the Company in February 1995
and the public offering made in June 1995.
At a hearing on May 22, 1995, the New York court granted the Company's
motion for summary judgment and dismissed the $1,000,000 claim against Fortune
and dismissed Fortune and LEX from the suit with prejudice based on an agreement
of all parties. Forster, BSR and Souki are now the only remaining defendants in
the action. At the hearing, the parties agreed that the escrow agent would
retain and hold in escrow not less than 400,000 shares and 400,000 warrants,
representing one-third of the total shares of Common Stock and warrants issued
in the transaction, pending further order of the court. Fortune agreed to
participate in the discovery process in the action as if it were a party to the
action and, as a matter of convenience to the court, agreed that the New York
court would retain jurisdiction over Fortune and LEX for purposes of enforcing
the provisions of the stipulation.
Subsequent to the consummation of the acquisition of LEX, Messrs. Forster
and Souki were elected to the Board of Directors of the Company. Their election
to the Board was not a term or condition of the transaction. In connection with
the acquisition, Mr. Forster and BSR agreed to indemnify Fortune against costs
and expenses in connection with the Baytree litigation and are currently
indebted to the Company in the amount of approximately $30,000 for expenses
incurred by Fortune in the litigation.
On April 24, 1995, the Company obtained a $300,000 "bridge" loan to enable
it to pay certain expenses, including $100,000 on its Credit Facility. The loan
was obtained from LEX, which in turn had borrowed the funds from several
individuals. Upon the consummation of the Company's acquisition of LEX, it
became liable on such loans. The loans were repaid out of the proceeds of the
Company's recently concluded Common Stock offering. Among the individuals who
loaned funds to LEX were Mrs. William H. Forster, mother of William D. Forster,
a principal of LEX and now a director and principal stockholder of Fortune, and
John E. McConnaughy, Jr., formerly a principal stockholder of the Company. Each
of Mrs. Forster and Mr. McConnaughy loaned LEX $100,000 and received from LEX,
as an inducement to make the loan, 33,333 shares of Common Stock and 33,333
stock purchase warrants out of 1,200,000 shares and 1,200,000 warrants issued to
LEX in conjunction with the acquisition. W. Forster & Co., Inc., a corporation
wholly owned by William D. Forster, received a $30,000 placement fee from the
Company for assistance in arranging the $300,000 bridge loan.
In order to provide additional capital for development activities, on
December 19 and 20, 1994, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $750,000 from
certain principal stockholders and from each of its directors then serving
(Messrs. Champion, Drulias, Fairbanks, Folsom and Walker). The directors loaned
$175,000 to the Company in the aggregate; $375,000 was obtained from Klein
Ventures, Inc.; and $200,000 was obtained from Jack Farber. The notes were
unsecured, bearing interest at 11% per annum (1.5% above the Bank One, Texas,
prime rate), payable monthly, and the notes were due six months from their
respective dates of issue.
Both the Klein Ventures, Inc. and Farber notes permit the holder to elect
to exchange their notes for shares of Common Stock at the price on the date the
notes were issued ($2.00 and $1.875 per share, respectively), and Fortune
reserved 294,166 shares of common stock for such purpose. On or about June 30,
1995, the estate of Mr. Farber converted its note into 106,667 shares of Common
Stock. As additional consideration for making the loan, Klein Ventures, Inc.
received 10,000 stock purchase warrants with an exercise price of $2.40 per
share, and Mr. Farber received 35,000 stock purchase warrants with an exercise
price of $1.875 per share. The Company also agreed to name two individuals
nominated by Mr. Farber to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors. Barry
Feiner, Esq., who served as counsel to Mr. Farber prior to the latter's death on
May 5, 1995 and to Barry Blank, another principal stockholder of the Company,
and Mr. Gary Gelman, Mr. Farber's grandson, were elected to the Board of
Directors in January 1995 pursuant to this agreement. Both Mr. Feiner and Mr.
Gelman were re-elected to the board by the stockholders at the 1995 annual
meeting.
At maturity, on December 21, 1995, Klein Ventures, Inc. opted for
conversion of its notes to Fortune common stock. The balance of the notes to the
directors were repaid in full.
F-16
<PAGE>
No future transaction will be entered into between the Company and members
of management or principal stockholders unless such transactions are approved by
a majority of the directors who are not members of management or principal
stockholders.
On January 1995, Daniel E. Pasquini, the former president of the Company,
agreed to a modification of a previous severance package. He accepted $85,000 in
cash, the exercise price of 45,000 stock options held by him was reduced to
$.575 per share and the Company issued him warrants to purchase 45,000 shares of
common stock at $2.75 per share.
Mr. Dean W. Drulias is a stockholder of and a practicing attorney at the
law firm of Burris, Drulias & Gartenberg, a Professional Corporation, which has
served as counsel to the Company since its incorporation in May 1987. Mr.
Drulias has served as a director since 1991 and as Secretary since July 1994.
During 1994 and 1995, his firm billed the Company a total of $109,950, and
$182,643, respectively, for legal fees and costs.
As compensation to outside directors, the Company pays directors' fees
equal to $2,500 per quarter, one half in shares of Fortune common stock valued
at $1,250 based on the value of the stock on the last day of each quarter and
$1,250 in cash. Inside directors do not receive such compensation
(10) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
On January 20, 1995, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation
to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 10,000,000
shares to 40,000,000 and the number of authorized preferred shares from 100,000
to 2,000,000.
The Company follows the intrinsic value method for stock options granted
to employees. In October 1995, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." The Company does
not intend to adopt the fair value method for stock-based compensation plans
which is an optional provision of Accounting Standard 123.
Fortune has four non-compensatory Stock Option Plans. The plans cover all
officers and employees of the Company. Three plans also provide for options for
directors of the Company. Awards are made by the Board of Directors upon
recommendations of its Compensation Committee. There is no performance formula
or measure. Options granted under the 1987 plan must be exercised within ten
years of the date of grant or are forfeited. Options granted under the 1988,
1991 and 1993 plans must be exercised within five years of the date of grant or
they are forfeited.
All options available under the 1987, 1988, 1991 and 1993 plans (including
the 1994 and 1995 grants under this plan) have been granted, and no shares
remain under any of these plans on which options may be granted. Options have
been granted as follows: options under the 1987 plan have been granted to
acquire 12,500 shares of Fortune Common Stock, at a price of $2.60 per share;
options of 27,500 at $2.60 per share under the 1988 plan; 32,500 at $6.00 per
share under the 1991 plan have been granted by the Board of Directors; and
75,000 options at $5.00 per share (the 1993 portion) and 263,000 options at
$5.48 per share (the 1994 portion) and 264,000 options at $6.03 per shares (the
1995 portion) have been granted under the five year plan adopted in 1993. The
prices of the options granted in 1991, 1993, 1994 and 1995 were reduced for all
optionholders who remained employees of the Company to $2.75 per share on
January 12, 1995.
In January 1995 a past director of the Company exercised 6,250 options at
$.58 under the 1987 stock option plan and 6,250 options under the 1988 plan,
10,000 options at $.58 under the 1991 plan and 22,500 options awarded in 1993
under the 1993 multi-year stock option plan at $.58. In December 1995 the same
past director exercised the balance of his available options, or 78,900 at $2.75
awarded in 1994 under the 1993 multi-year plan.
In July 1995 a director exercised 3,750 options at $2.75, awarded him in
1993 under the same plan.
F-17
<PAGE>
In September 1995 an employee of the Company exercised 14,383 options at
$2.75 under the 1993 multi-year stock option plan, covering the 1993 and 1994
awards and a portion of the 1995 award.
In November 1995 an employee exercised 500 options at $2.60 under the 1987
plan, 1,250 options at $2.60 under the 1988 plan and 15,200 options at $2.75,
awarded in 1994 under the 1993 multi-year stock option plan.
In December 1995 an employee exercised 875 options at $2.60 under the 1987
plan, 2,964 options at $2.75 under the 1991 plan, 3,383 options at $2.75 awarded
in 1993 under the 1993 multi-year stock option plan, 11,100 options at $2.75,
awarded in 1994 under the same plan and 7,543 options at $2.75, the 1995 award
under the plan.
Also in December 1995 another employee exercised 3,383 options at $2.75
awarded him in 1993 under the 1993 multi-year stock option plan, and 6,617
options representing a portion of the 1994 award under the same plan.
In July 1994, a director, exercised 4,688 options at an exercise price of
$2.60 per share from his option under the 1988 stock option plan.
In March 1993, two past directors of the Company exercised 4,688 options
each at an exercise price of $2.60 per share from their options under the 1988
Stock Option Plan.
At December 31, 1995 the Company's outstanding warrants to purchase
common stock consisted of:
NUMBER OF WARRANTS EXERCISE PRICE RANGE EXPIRATION DATE
------------------ -------------------- ---------------
187,500 $ 3.88 06/30/96
10,000 $ 2.40 12/19/96
35,000 $ 1.88 12/20/96
100,000 $ 6.00 12/11/97
50,000 $ 4.63 12/11/97
2,133,903 $ 3.75 - $ 4.41 09/28/98
57,375 $11.14 10/05/98*
45,000 $ 2.75 01/06/00
25,000 $ 3.25 05/30/00
1,200,000 $ 4.75 05/12/00
100,000 $ 4.75 08/01/00
60,000 $ 3.63 09/06/00
----------
4,003,778
----------
* Each warrant permits the holder to purchase 3.3 shares of common stock
plus two stock purchase warrants, expiring September 28, 1998, which
permit the holder to purchase one additional share of common stock at an
exercise price of $3.75.
(11) MAJOR CUSTOMER
The Company sold oil representing 56% of its oil production under
contracts to one customer for the year ended December 31, 1995. 71% of the
Company's gas production was sold under contracts to three customers (29%, 26%
and 16%, respectively) for the year ended December 31, 1995.
The Company sold oil representing 72% of its oil production under
contracts to one customer for the year ended December 31, 1994. 88% of the
Company's gas production was sold to three customers (48%, 25% and 15%,
respectively) for the year ended December 31, 1994.
F-18
<PAGE>
The Company sold oil representing 82% of its oil production under
contracts to two customers (68% and 14%, respectively) for the year ended
December 31, 1993. 90% of the Company's gas production was sold to two customers
(64% and 26%, respectively) for the year ended December 31, 1993.
(12) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, debt and other financial assets and liabilities approximate
their fair value.
(13) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 8, 1996 the option to acquire a 4.1667% working interest in the
South Timbalier Block 76 was exercised for $790,000 plus the retention by
Fortune of a $150,000 deposit for a total of $940,000 reducing the Company's
interest in the block to 12-1/2% working interest (9.375% net revenue interest)
effective January 1, 1996. The closing of the transaction took place on March
11, 1996.
The interest acquired by Fortune was originally owned by PetroFina, Inc.,
which had agreed to sell the interest to Northport Production Company. In turn,
Northport had agreed to sell the property to Mr. Donald L. Walker. In order to
secure the right to purchase the interest, Mr. Walker gave PetroFina a
non-refundable security deposit of $150,000. In order to step into Mr. Walker's
position, Fortune paid Mr. Walker $100,000 in cash, agreed to issue stock
purchase warrants for 150,000 shares of Common Stock and granted Mr. Walker the
option referred to below. (The warrants are exercisable for two years at the
following prices: 50,000 shares at $4.63 per share and 100,000 shares at $6.00
per share.) In addition, Fortune gave an additional security deposit to
PetroFina of $100,000.
Fortune paid a total of $2.9 million for its interest in the South
Timbalier Block. Of that amount, approximately $560,000 was paid out of the net
cash flow from Fortune's interest in the property between June 1, 1995 and
approximately mid-October 1995. In addition, the $150,000 deposit paid by Mr.
Walker and the $100,000 deposit paid by Fortune were applied to the purchase
price. At the closing of the transaction, the net cash paid by Fortune for its
interest in the South Timbalier Block was approximately $2,090,000. Fortune
granted Pendragon Resources, a Texas limited liability company owned by Donald
L. Walker, the right, exercisable until March 11, 1996, to acquire the 4-1/6%
working interest in the South Timbalier Block for $790,000 and the retention of
a deposit of $150,000. As noted above, Pendragon Resources exercised this option
on March 8, 1996.
During 1995 the Company had entered into a purchase and sale agreement to
sell the majority of its California properties comprising of Hopper Canyon,
Holser Canyon, Oxnard Field and Shiels Canyon in Ventura County and Bacon Hills
Lease in Kern County. The properties were divested on February 23, 1996, to a
private oil and gas producer group for a combined price of $840,000 with an
effective date of December 31, 1995. The Company has signed a letter of intent
to sell its remaining California property to Seneca Resources Corporation, to be
effective December 1, 1995. The transaction is expected to close on March 31,
1996. At December 31, 1995, the Company has classified as oil and gas properties
held for sale the net proceeds estimated to be received from both of these
transactions and recorded an impairment reserve of $1.4 million.
(14) UNAUDITED PRO-FORMA OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES AND OIL AND GAS COST
INFORMATION
All of the Company's reserves are located within the United States. Proved
reserves represent estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which
geological and engineering data demonstrate to be reasonably certain to be
recoverable in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic and
operating conditions Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can
be expected to be recovered through existing wells using existing equipment and
operating methods.
For the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993, the oil and gas reserve
estimates were reviewed by Huddleston & Co., Inc., ("Huddleston") Houston, Texas
independent petroleum engineers and Sherwin D. Yoelin, independent petroleum
engineer, and for the year ended December 31, 1995, by Huddleston, in accordance
with guidelines established by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such
estimates are subject to numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of
quantities of proved reserves and in the projection of future rates of
production, prices and the timing of development expenditures. The future cash
inflow, as reflected in the "Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash
Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves", determined from such reserve
data are estimates only, and the present values thereof should not be construed
to be the current market values of the Company's oil and gas reserves or the
costs that would be incurred to obtain equivalent reserves.
F-19
<PAGE>
CHANGES IN ESTIMATED RESERVE QUANTITIES
The Company's net interests in estimated quantities of proved developed
and undeveloped reserves of crude oil and natural gas at December 31, 1993,
1994, and 1995, and changes in such quantities during the years, 1993, 1994 and
1995, were as follows:
CRUDE OIL (BARRELS)
-----------------------------
YEAR YEAR YEAR
1993 1994 1995
------ ------ ------
(in thousands)
BEGINNING OF PERIOD ........................ 2,066 813 1,647
Revisions of previous estimates ........ (1,195) 866 (160)
Production ............................. (79) (88) (92)
Purchase of minerals in place .......... 77 56 174
sales of minerals in place* ............ (56) -- (1,222)
------ ------ ------
END OF PERIOD .............................. 813 1,647 347
====== ====== ======
Proved developed reserves
Beginning of period ................. 983 666 675
====== ====== ======
End of period ......................... 666 675 324
====== ====== ======
NATURAL GAS (MCF)
-----------------------------
YEAR YEAR YEAR
1993 1994 1995
------ ------ ------
(in thousands)
BEGINNING OF PERIOD ........................ 4,795 5,562 5,911
Revisions of previous estimates ........ (1,183) 533 (388)
Production ............................. (724) (1,017) (909)
Purchase of minerals in place .......... 3,010 833 2,934
Sales of minerals in place* ............ (336) -- (1,610)
------ ------ ------
END OF PERIOD .............................. 5,562 5,911 5,938
====== ====== ======
Proved developed reserves
Beginning of period ................... 2,582 4,221 3,317
====== ====== ======
End of period ......................... 4,221 3,317 4,686
====== ====== ======
* During 1995, the Company's interests in its California properties, which
were sold in February 1996, were transferred to oil and gas properties held for
sale.
F-20
<PAGE>
NET CASH FLOWS RELATING TO PROVED OIL AND GAS RESERVES
This statement attempts to present future net cash flows related to proved
oil and gas reserves without the subjectivity inherent in either direct
estimation of market value or entity specific discounted net cash flow. This
measure is not a measure of fair market value nor a measure of the present value
of future cash flows, but rather a rough estimation of such.
This measure should be responsive to some of the key variables that affect
fair market value, such as changes in reserve quantities, selling prices,
production costs and tax rates.
The future net cash inflows are developed as follows:
(1) Estimates are made of quantities of proved reserves and the
future periods during which they are expected to be produced
based on period-end economic conditions.
(2) The estimated future production of proved reserves is priced on
the basis of period-end prices except for fixed and determinable
escalation provisions in existing contracts.
(3) The resulting future gross revenue streams are reduced by
estimated future costs to develop and to produce the proved
reserves, based on period-end cost estimates.
(4) The resulting future net revenue streams are reduced to present
value amounts by applying a 10 percent discount factor.
STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS RELATING TO PROVED OIL
AND GAS RESERVES
Disclosure of the principal component of the standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows provides information concerning the factors
involved in making the calculation. In addition, the disclosure of both
undiscounted and discounted net flows provides a measure of comparing proved oil
and gas reserves both with and without an estimate of production timing. The
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved
reserves reflects income taxes.
1993 1994 1995
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Future cash inflows ........................ $ 22,153 $ 32,898 $ 19,531
Future costs:
Production .............................. (7,950) (11,283) (6,050)
Development ............................. (1,368) (5,683) (881)
-------- -------- --------
Future net inflows before income taxes ..... 12,835 15,932 12,600
Future income taxes ........................ -- -- --
-------- -------- --------
Future net cash flows ...................... 12,835 15,932 $ 12,600
10% discount factor ........................ (4,281) (7,784) (3,658)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of
discounted net cash flows ................ $ 8,554 $ 8,148 $ 8,942
======== ======== ========
F-21
<PAGE>
CHANGES IN STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF DISCOUNTED FUTURE NET CASH FLOWS FROM PROVEN
RESERVE QUANTITIES
This statement discloses the sources of changes in the standardized measure
from period to period. The amount reported as "Net change in sales and transfer
prices" represents the approximate effect of increasing the evaluation of
reserves proved in prior periods to reflect higher prices in effect in the
following years. The "Accretion of discount" was computed by applying the 10
percent discount factor to be valuation of the proved reserves as of the
beginning of the period before income tax effects. "Changes in estimated future
development costs" arise from several sources: (1) revisions of previous
estimates for both development costs actually incurred in the current period and
for development costs estimated to be incurred in succeeding periods, (2) new
discoveries from which future development must be performed and (3)
current-period expenditures which reduced the future expenditures estimated in
prior periods (the amounts at the beginning of the period). The "Sales and
transfers, net of production costs" are expressed in actual dollar amounts.
"Revisions of quantity estimates" are expressed at period-end prices. The "Net
change in income taxes" is computed as the change in present value of future
income taxes. The "Changes in production rates (timing) and other" reflects all
other changes, such as changes in timing, and includes the residual from
estimation errors in computing other elements of change.
1993 1994 1995
-------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Standardized Measure:
Beginning of period ................ $ 5,646 $ 8,554 $ 8,148
Increases (decreases):
Sales and transfers, net of
production costs ....................... (1,816) (2,249) (1,445)
Net change in sales and transfer
prices net of production costs ......... (2,087) (1,635) 460
Changes in estimated future
development costs ...................... 4,197 (4,315) 500
Revisions of quantity estimates ........ (10,999) 6,385 (871)
Accretion of discount .................. 565 855 814
Net change in income taxes ............. 5,905 -- --
Purchases of reserves in place ......... 7,231 1,464 5,329
Sales of reserves in place* ............ (291) -- (3,024)
Changes in production rates
(timing) and other ..................... 203 (911) (969)
-------- ------- -------
Standardized Measure:
End of period .......................... $ 8,554 $ 8,148 $ 8,942
======== ======= =======
*During 1995, the Company's interests in its California properties,which
were sold in February 1996, were transferred to oil and gas properties
held for sale.
F-22
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Unaudited) (Audited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents ............................................. $ 1,409,000 $ 1,888,000
Accounts receivable ................................................... 547,000 1,035,000
Oil and gas properties held for sale .................................. -- 1,180,000
Prepaid expenses and oil inventory .................................... 62,000 127,000
------------ ------------
Total Current Assets ................................................ 2,018,000 4,230,000
------------ ------------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Oil and gas properties, accounted for
using the successful efforts method ................................. 18,994,000 18,960,000
Automotive, office and other .......................................... 332,000 227,000
------------ ------------
19,326,000 19,187,000
Less--accumulated depletion, depreciation
and amortization ................................................... (8,647,000) (7,821,000)
------------ ------------
10,679,000 11,366,000
------------ ------------
OTHER ASSETS:
Materials, supplies and other ......................................... 187,000 62,000
Bond issuance costs (net of accumulated
amortization of $224,000 and $180,000) .............................. 65,000 109,000
Restricted cash ....................................................... 2,780,000
------------
3,230,000
3,032,000 3,401,000
------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS ............................................................ $ 15,729,000 $ 18,997,000
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
------------------ -----------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current portion of long term debt ..................................... $ 1,475,000 $ 3,208,000
Accounts payable ...................................................... 192,000 280,000
Accrued expenses ...................................................... 98,000 96,000
Royalties and working interests payable ............................... 20,000 94,000
Accrued interest ...................................................... 57,000 119,000
------------ ------------
Total Current Liabilities ......................................... 1,842,000 3,797,000
------------ ------------
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion ................................. 1,680,000 1,689,000
------------ ------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value:
Authorized--2,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--None ........................................ -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value :
Authorized--40,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding 11,431,664 and
11,139,709 at September 30, 1996 and
December 31, 1995, respectively ..................................... 114,000 111,000
Capital in excess of par value ........................................ 28,101,000 27,228,000
Accumulated deficit ................................................... (16,008,000) (13,828,000)
------------ ------------
NET STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY .............................................. 12,207,000 13,511,000
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY ............................ $ 15,729,000 $ 18,997,000
============ ============
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-23
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
--------------------------------
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 1995
------------ -----------
REVENUES
Sales of oil and gas, net of royalties .... $ 2,830,000 $ 2,030,000
Gain on sale of oil and gas properties, net 243,000 --
Other income .............................. 160,000 153,000
------------ -----------
3,233,000 2,183,000
------------ -----------
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Production and operating ................ 1,000,000 1,037,000
Exploration ............................. 825,000 383,000
Dryhole ................................. 754,000 --
Provision for depletion, depreciation
and amortization ...................... 834,000 989,000
Impairment to oil and gas properties .... 37,000 --
General and administrative .............. 1,418,000 855,000
Office relocation and severance ......... 207,000 --
Interest ................................ 338,000 533,000
------------ -----------
5,413,000 3,797,000
------------ -----------
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES ........................ (2,180,000) (1,614,000)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES ................ -- --
------------ -----------
NET LOSS .................................. $ (2,180,000) $(1,614,000)
============ ===========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING ............... 11,284,701 5,432,712
============ ===========
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE ................. $ (0.19) $ (0.30)
============ ===========
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-24
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK CAPITAL IN
-------------------------- EXCESS OF ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT PAR VALUE DEFICIT NET
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, January 1, 1995 ................. 2,644,032 $ 26,000 $ 11,253,000 $ (7,614,000) $ 3,665,000
=========== ======== ============ ============ ============
Common stock returned to treasury ......... (12) -- -- -- --
Common stock issued for exercise
of stock options ....................... 202,481 2,000 500,000 -- 502,000
Common stock issued for
directors fees ......................... 14,445 -- 39,000 -- 39,000
Common stock issued for
stock offerings ........................ 6,569,117 65,000 11,729,000 -- 11,794,000
Common stock issued for merger ............ 1,200,000 12,000 2,480,000 -- 2,492,000
Common stock and warrants issued
for payment of investment
banking services ....................... 100,000 2,000 263,000 -- 265,000
Common stock issued for
warrant conversion ..................... 115,479 1,000 392,000 -- 393,000
Common stock issued for
note conversion ........................ 294,167 3,000 572,000 -- 575,000
Net loss .................................. -- -- -- (6,214,000) (6,214,000)
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE, December 31, 1995 ................ 11,139,709 $111,000 $ 27,228,000 $(13,828,000) $ 13,511,000
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Common stock issued for exercise
of stock options ....................... 46,150 -- 114,000 -- 114,000
Common stock issued for
exercise of warrants ................... 245,638 3,000 785,000 -- 788,000
Common stock issued for
directors' fees ........................ 1,395 -- 4,000 -- 4,000
Common stock canceled and
stock issuance cost .................... (1,227) -- (30,000) -- (30,000)
Common stock returned to treasury ......... (1) -- -- -- --
Net loss .................................. -- -- -- (2,180,000) (2,180,000)
----------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 ............... 11,431,664 $114,000 $ 28,101,000 $(16,008,000) $ 12,207,000
=========== ======== ============ ============ ============
(Unaudited)
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-25
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Unaudited)
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
----------------------------------------
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss ..................................................................... $(2,180,000) $(1,614,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Common stock issued for directors' fees ...................................... 4,000 29,000
Depletion, depreciation and amortization ..................................... 834,000 989,000
Exploration and dry hole cost ................................................ 1,579,000 383,000
Gain on disposition of assets ................................................ (243,000) --
Impairment of oil and gas assets ............................................. 37,000 --
Provision for executive severance ............................................ -- (17,000)
Amortization of financing cost ............................................... 56,000 --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable ....................................................... 488,000 (41,000)
Prepaids and oil inventory ................................................ 65,000 (56,000)
Notes receivable .......................................................... -- 11,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses ..................................... (86,000) (138,000)
Payment of executive severance ............................................ -- (91,000)
Royalties and working interest payable .................................... (74,000) 19,000
Accrued interest .......................................................... (62,000) (54,000)
Other ..................................................................... -- 122,000
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities .......................... 418,000 (458,000)
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Expenditures for oil and gas properties ...................................... (1,059,000) (1,937,000)
Expenditures for exploration and dry hole costs .............................. (1,194,000) (355,000)
Restricted cash used ......................................................... 450,000 (2,373,000)
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment ............................... 2,018,000 --
Expenditures for other property and equipment
and other assets ........................................................... (233,000) (6,000)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities .......................... (18,000) (4,671,000)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of long term debt .................................................. (1,754,000) (1,078,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock ....................................... 903,000 8,869,000
Expenditures for offering cost ............................................... (28,000) (390,000)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities .......................... (879,000) 7,401,000
----------- -----------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ............................................................. (479,000) 2,272,000
----------- -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD ..................................... 1,888,000 398,000
----------- -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD ........................................... $ 1,409,000 $ 2,670,000
=========== ===========
Supplemental information:
Interest paid in cash ........................................................ $ 283,000 $ 587,000
Non-cash transactions:
Common stock issued or issuable as directors' fees ........................... 4,000 29,000
Common Stock issued for payment of executive severance ....................... -- 43,000
Common Stock issued to acquire LEX ........................................... -- 2,492,000
Common Stock issued to conversion of debt .................................... -- 200,000
Common Stock and warrants issued for payment
of investment banking fees ................................................. -- 265,000
</TABLE>
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-26
<PAGE>
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 1996
(1) LINE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES
The condensed financial statements at September 30, 1996, and for the nine
months then ended included herein have been prepared by the Company, without
audit, pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such Rules and
Regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to
make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the
notes thereto included in the Company's latest annual report on Form 10-KSB.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to
presentation in the current period. In the opinion of the Company, the financial
statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of Fortune
Petroleum Corporation as of September 30, 1996 and December 31, 1995, the
results of its operations for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and
September 30, 1995, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 1996
and September 30, 1995. The results of the operations for such interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
(2) LONG TERM DEBT
At September 30, 1996, a summary of long-term debt is as follows:
September 30, December 31,
1996 1995
---------- ----------
Convertible Subordinated Debentures
of $1,725,000 (net of discount of
$45,000 and $57,000) due
December 31, 1997, including
interest of 10-1/2%
per annum paid semi-annually .............. $1,680,000 $1,668,000
Bank One credit facility due
July 1, 1997 including interest
at 1-1/2% over Bank One, Texas,
NA's prime rate payable monthly ........... 1,475,000 3,200,000
Other debt with interest ranging
from 0% to 9-1/4% per annum ................ -- 29,000
---------- ----------
Total long-term debt ......................... 3,155,000 4,897,000
Less current installments .................... 1,475,000 3,208,000
---------- ----------
Long-term debt, excluding
current installments ...................... $1,680,000 $1,689,000
========== ==========
The 10-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due December 31, 1997 bear
an effective interest rate of 12.13% and are convertible into shares of the
Company's common stock, after April 1, 1994, at a conversion price of $6.32 per
share or 158 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debenture. Therefore, if all
$1,725,000 were converted, the number of the Company's common shares then
outstanding would increase by 272,981 shares. The Company has filed a
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection
with a possible exchange offer to be made to holders of the Company's
outstanding Debentures. If the exchange offer is made, the Company anticipates
that the exchange ratio would be based upon a common stock price substantially
lower than the $6.32 per share conversion price called for under the terms of
the Debentures and the exchange offer may include additional consideration
payable to the Debentureholders who convert, such as common stock warrants. In
such event, the Company would issue substantially more common shares upon
successful completion of the exchange offer than the 272,981 shares discussed
above. Further, the Company would incur a non-cash debt conversion expense equal
to the excess of the fair market value of all common stock and common stock
warrants issued in
F-27
<PAGE>
connection with the exchange offer over the fair market value of the 272,981
shares of common stock that could have been issued under the original terms of
the Debentures. The purpose of the exchange offer would be to relieve the
Company of $1,725,000 of long term debt and approximately $180,000 of annual
interest expense. No assurance can be given that such exchange offer will be
made by the Company or, if made, that it will result in the exchange of any of
the Debentures into shares of common stock.
The Company has a credit facility with Bank One, Texas, N.A. under which
it has the ability to borrow amounts up to an available borrowing base as
defined in the credit agreement. The amount the Company may borrow under the
Credit Facility is determined by the borrowing base as calculated by the Bank
semi-annually on the basis of the Company's oil and gas reserves. The credit
facility contains various financial covenants, is secured by all of the
Company's oil and gas producing properties and currently requires monthly
principal payments of $75,000. At December 31, 1995, the Company was not in
compliance with its cash flow coverage ratio covenant in the credit agreement.
Under the terms of credit agreement, the bank has the right to demand repayment
of the entire loan balance in the event of covenant defaults. The Company
obtained a waiver of this covenant from the bank as of December 31, 1995;
however, the Company is not able to borrow additional amounts under the credit
facility because Bank One has set the borrowing base equal to the loan balance
which declines by $75,000 per month. The Company has determined that it is in
compliance with the cash flow coverage ratio for the quarter ended September 30,
1996. During February 1996, the Company made a principal reduction of
$1,100,000, primarily from the proceeds of the sale of its California
properties.
The Company's maturities of long-term debt over the next two years are as
follows:
YEAR LONG-TERM DEBT MATURITY
---- -----------------------
1996 $ 225,000
1997 2,930,000
$ 3,155,000
(3) INCOME TAX EXPENSE
No provision for income taxes was required for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 1996.
At September 30, 1996, the Company estimates it had cumulative net
operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $10.7 million
which are significantly restricted under IRC Section 382. These carryforwards
are available to offset future federal taxable income, if any, with various
expirations through 2008. The Company is uncertain as to the recoverability of
the above deferred tax assets and has therefore applied a 100% valuation
allowance.
The Company has available IRC Section 29 Tax Credits that may be used to
reduce or eliminate any corporate taxable income in future years. It is
uncertain at this time to what extent the Company will be able to utilize these
federal tax credits, as their utilization is dependent upon the amount, if any,
of future federal income tax incurred, after application of the Company's net
operating loss carryforwards.
(4) LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no pending material legal proceedings involving any of the
Company's properties or which involve a claim for damages which exceed 10% of
the Company's current assets.
On March 26, 1996, Fortune was served with a lawsuit which had been filed
in the Federal District Court in Delaware by one of the purchasers of Fortune
common stock in an offering in December 1995 under Regulation S. Under the terms
of the subscription agreement, the plaintiff was entitled to receive additional
shares of Fortune stock if the market price fell below a stated level during a
specified period following the 40-day holding period prescribed by Regulation S.
Plaintiff's complaint alleges that the price during the relevant interval did
fall below the level necessary for plaintiff to receive additional shares, but
that Fortune has failed to issue the stock.
F-28
<PAGE>
Fortune has responded, admitting the essential allegations of the
complaint, but has pled, by way of affirmative defense, that suspicious trading
activity in Fortune stock occurred immediately prior to and during the time
period in which the additional-share allocation was computed. Fortune requested,
and the American Stock Exchange commenced, an investigation into such trading
irregularities. That investigation is continuing. Fortune does not intend to
issue any additional shares to plaintiff pending the outcome of the
investigation; however, in connection with this litigation, the Company has
placed 31,042 shares of common stock into escrow with the Federal District Court
in Delaware. This stock represents the maximum number of shares that the Company
will be required to issue to the plaintiff in the event the Company's suspicions
concerning the plaintiff's trading activity prove to be unfounded. Fortune has
also commenced, and intends to aggressively pursue, discovery in an attempt to
determine whether any action of the purchasers in this offering contributed to
its share price fluctuation.
On April 16, 1996, Fortune was advised that similar suits had been filed
in Federal District Court in New York by two other buyers in the same offering.
The allegations parallel those contained in the earlier suit filed in Delaware,
and Fortune is responding in the same manner. No shares of Fortune common stock
have been issued into escrow in connection with these two actions.
(5) COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Primary earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding. Common equivalent shares are shares which may be issuable upon
exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants; however, they are not
included in the computation for the nine month period ended September 30, 1996
since they would not have a dilutive effect on earnings per share.
Fully diluted earnings per common share are not presented, since the
conversion of the Company's 10-1/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures would
have an anti-dilutive effect.
(6) ACQUISITIONS
On July 1, 1996, the Company sold all of its interest in the Ainsworth
Lease in Scurry County, Texas for $76,500 to a third party. The Company recorded
a $3,000 gain from sale on this transaction.
(7) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In late July 1996, the Company received invoices from Ampolex (USA), Inc.,
the operator of the Company's New Mexico properties, billing Fortune for
$232,805 of outstanding accounts receivable attributable to two other working
interest owners in the properties which the operator failed to collect from such
owners. The Company is reviewing this matter.
F-29
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors
Fortune Petroleum Corporation
We have audited the accompanying statements of revenues and direct
operating expenses of the oil and gas property interests acquired from PetroFina
S.A. (the PetroFina Properties) for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1994. These statements of revenues and direct operating
expenses are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these statements of revenues and direct operating
expenses based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the statements of revenues and direct
operating expenses are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the statements of revenues and direct operating expenses. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the statements of
revenues and direct operating expenses. We believe that our audits of the
statements of revenues and direct operating expenses provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
The accompanying statements were prepared as described in Note 1 for the
purpose of complying with certain rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) for inclusion in certain SEC regulatory reports and
filings and are not intended to be a complete financial presentation.
In our opinion, the accompanying statements of revenues and direct
operating expenses present fairly, in all material respects, the revenues and
direct operating expenses of the PetroFina Properties for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 1994, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Houston, Texas
December 20, 1995
F-30
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES
ACQUIRED FROM PETROFINA S.A. (NOTE 1) FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1992, 1993 AND 1994 AND FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 AND 1995 (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
(unaudited)
1992 1993 1994 1994 1995
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES
Sales of oil and gas, net of
royalties ................................ $2,101,807 $2,005,626 $1,599,418 $1,350,770 $1,508,258
DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES ..................... 304,171 229,199 700,031 117,232 252,073
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
REVENUES IN EXCESS OF DIRECT
OPERATING EXPENSES ........................ $1,797,636 $1,776,427 $ 899,387 $1,233,538 $1,256,185
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
See notes to Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses for Assets
Acquired from PetroFina S.A.
F-31
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES
ACQUIRED FROM PETROFINA S.A. FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1992, 1993 AND
1994 AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 AND 1995 (UNAUDITED)
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying statements present the revenues and direct operating
expenses of the working interests in certain oil and gas properties (the
PetroFina Properties) purchased by Fortune Petroleum Corporation (the Company)
from PetroFina S.A. (PetroFina) during December 1995 for $2.9 million. The
PetroFina Properties are located in federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico.
The accompanying statements of revenues and direct operating expenses were
derived from the historical accounting records of PetroFina. Direct operating
expenses include payroll, lease and well repairs, maintenance and other direct
operating expenses.
The unaudited statements of revenues and direct operating expenses for the
nine months ended September 30, 1994 and 1995 include all material adjustments,
which consist only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation, and are not necessarily indicative of results for an entire year.
OMITTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Full historical financial statements, including exploration expense,
general and administrative expenses, interest expense and income tax expense,
have not been presented because they have not historically been allocated at
this level. Historical depletion expense has not been included in such
statements as the Company will adjust the basis in its purchase price allocation
and the historical depletion will no longer be relevant.
ACCRUAL BASIS STATEMENTS
Memorandum adjustments have been made to the financial information derived
from the predecessor owner in order to present the accompanying statements of
revenues and direct operating expenses in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
All of the production from the PetroFina Properties was sold to a
subsidiary of PetroFina. Gas production was sold for average prices of $1.73,
$2.27 and $2.10 per Mcf during 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively. Oil production
was sold for average price of $17.71, $15.56 and $14.15 during 1992, 1993 and
1994, respectively.
(2) GAS BALANCING POSITIONS
The PetroFina Properties have an immaterial imbalance position as of
December 31, 1995. The entitlements method is used; therefore, production
imbalances are recorded at the sales price in effect at the time of production.
Substantially all of the imbalance position is anticipated to be settled with
production in future periods.
F-32
<PAGE>
(3) SUPPLEMENTAL OIL AND GAS RESERVE INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Total proved and proved developed oil and gas reserves of the PetroFina
Properties at December 31, 1994, have been estimated based on reserve estimates
prepared by Huddleston & Co., Inc. as of November 1, 1995, adjusted for
production from January 1, 1995 through October 31, 1995. No comparable
estimates were available for prior periods. Therefore, reserves for 1992, 1993
and 1994 have been calculated by adjusting the November 1, 1995 amounts for
prior period producing activities and, consequently, no revisions of previous
estimates have been reflected. All reserve estimates are based on economic and
operating conditions existing at November 1, 1995. The future net cash flows
from production of these proved reserve quantities were computed by applying
current prices of oil and gas (with consideration of price changes only to the
extent provided by contractual arrangements) as of November 1, 1995 to estimated
future production of proved oil and gas reserves less the estimated future
expenditures (based on current costs) as of November 1, 1995, to be incurred in
developing and producing proved reserves. Income taxes were calculated without
consideration of any remaining historical cost basis of the PetroFina
Properties. The PetroFina Properties are located in federal waters in the Gulf
of Mexico.
Estimated Quantities of Oil and Gas Reserves:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1992 1993 1994
-------------- -------------- --------------
Oil Gas Oil Gas Oil Gas
(MBBL) (MMCF) (MBBL) (MMCF) (MBBL) (MMCF)
---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Proved reserves:
Beginning of year ...... 346 5,493 291 4,751 251 4,159
Production ............. (55) (742) (40) (592) (34) (533)
---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
End of year ............ 291 4,751 251 4,159 217 3,626
==== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Proved developed reserves:
Beginning of year ...... 346 5,493 291 4,751 251 4,159
End of year ............ 291 4,751 251 4,159 217 3,626
==== ====== ==== ====== ==== ======
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved
Oil and Gas Reserves (in 000s):
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1992 1993 1994
-------- -------- --------
Future cash inflows ............... $ 15,017 $ 13,011 $ 11,412
Future production costs ........... (2,597) (2,368) (1,668)
Future development costs .......... (200) (200) (200)
-------- -------- --------
Future net inflows before
income taxes ................... 12,220 10,443 9,544
Income taxes ...................... (4,277) (3,655) (3,340)
-------- -------- --------
Future net cash flows ............. 7,943 6,788 6,204
10% discount factor ............... (2,264) (1,935) (1,766)
-------- -------- --------
Standardized measure of
discounted net cash flows ....... $ 5,679 $ 4,853 $ 4,438
======== ======== ========
Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows from
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (in 000s):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1992 1993 1994
------- ------- -------
Standardized measure, beginning of year .... $ 6,515 $ 5,679 $ 4,853
Sales, net of production costs .......... (1,798) (1,776) (899)
Net change in income taxes .............. 450 445 225
Accretion of discount ...................... 512 505 259
------- ------- -------
Standardized measure, end of year .......... $ 5,679 $ 4,853 $ 4,438
======= ======= =======
F-33
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DECEMBER 31, 1995
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations reflects the
results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1995 as if the PetroFina
acquisition of the South Timbalier Block 76 leasehold interests and this
financing occurred as of January 1 of the year then ended.
The acquisition is reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined
financial information using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the
carrying value of the property acquired has been adjusted to reflect fair values
assigned to assets and liabilities and are included in the Company's combined
financial statements commencing on the date of such acquisition.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information should be read in
conjunction with the Company's historical financial statements and related
notes. The pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the
periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results of future
operations.
F-34
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PETROFINA
LEASEHOLD
HISTORICAL INTEREST PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
FORTUNE ACQUISITION ADJUSTMENTS COMBINED
----------- ---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Oil and gas sales ............ $ 2,959,000 $1,258,000 -- $ 4,217,000
Other ........................ 234,000 -- -- 234,000
----------- ---------- ------------ ------------
3,193,000 1,258,000 -- 4,451,000
Costs and expenses: (a)
Oil and gas production costs . 1,514,000 210,000 -- 1,724,000
General and administrative ... 1,212,000 -- 1,212,000
Abandoned leasehold costs .... 56,000 -- 56,000
Dry hole expense ............. 998,000 -- -- 998,000
Impairment to oil and gas
properties ............... 2,530,000 -- -- 2,530,000
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization ............... 1,809,000 -- 488,000 2,297,000
Geological and geophysical
expense .................... 418,000 -- -- 418,000
Interest Expense ............. 870,000 -- -- 870,000
----------- ---------- ------------ ------------
9,407,000 210,000 488,000 10,105,000
----------- ---------- ------------ ------------
Income (loss) before income
taxes ........................ (6,214,000) 1,048,000 (488,000) (5,654,000)
Income tax expense ............... -- -- -- --
----------- ---------- ------------ ------------
Net Income (loss) ................ $(6,214,000) $1,048,000 $ (488,000) $ (5,654,000)
=========== ========== ============ ============
Average number of common
shares outstanding (b) ....... 6,555,875 1,235,742 -- 7,791,617
=========== ========== ============ ============
Net income (loss) per common
share ........................ $ (0.95)
============
Pro Forma net income (loss) per common
share ........................ $ (0.73)
============
</TABLE>
- ------------
(a) It is anticipated that there will be no indirect expense as a result of
the asset acquisition.
(b) Acquisition shares computed using the private offering price of $3.22 per
share for 1,321,117 shares.
See notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
F-35
<PAGE>
FORTUNE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
DECEMBER 31, 1995
An explanation of the pro forma adjustments is as follows:
(1) Adjustment to reflect the depreciation, depletion and amortization of
the acquired assets of $488,000, for the year ended December 31, 1995
using the units of production method.
F-36
<PAGE>
================================================================================
NO DEALER, SALESMAN OR ANY OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND,
IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS
HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY OR ANY UNDERWRITER. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES
NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OF ANY SECURITIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT RELATES
OR AN OFFER TO SELL, OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, TO ANY PERSON IN ANY
JURISDICTION WHERE SUCH AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION WOULD BE UNLAWFUL. NEITHER THE
DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS
CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE HEREOF.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
Available Information 2
Prospectus Summary 3
Risk Factors 6
Use of Proceeds 11
Dilution 11
Capitalization 12
Dividend Policy 13
Price Range of Common Stock 13
Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of
Operations 14
Business and Properties 19
Management 33
Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions 38
Principal Stockholders 40
Exchange Offer 42
Certain Federal Income Tax
Considerations 42
Description of Securities 45
Legal Matters 49
Experts 50
Glossary 50
Index to Financial Statements F-1
================================================================================
493,350 SHARES
500,250 WARRANTS
FORTUNE PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
------------
PROSPECTUS
------------
EXCHANGE OFFER
DECEMBER 2, 1996
================================================================================
