GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP /PA/
U-1/A, 1995-06-09
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP /PA/, 424B2, 1995-06-09
Next: GENERAL SIGNAL CORP, SC 13G/A, 1995-06-09









                                         Amendment No. 3 to
                                         SEC File No. 70-8593





                 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                       WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549




                              FORM U-1

                            APPLICATION

                               UNDER


       THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 ("Act")






            GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION ("GPU")
                       100 Interpace Parkway
                   Parsippany, New Jersey  07054                  

             (Name of company filing this statement and
               address of principal executive office)









 T. G. Howson, Vice President       Douglas E. Davidson, Esq.
   and Treasurer                    Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP
 M. A. Nalewako, Secretary          120 West 45th Street
 GPU Service Corporation            New York, New York 10036
 100 Interpace Parkway
 Parsippany, New Jersey 07054
                                                                 

            (Names and addresses of agents for service)
<PAGE>





           GPU hereby amends its Application on Form U-1, docketed

 in SEC File No. 70-8593, as heretofore amended, as follows:

           1.   By  completing  Item  2  thereof to  read  in  its

 entirety as follows:

           ITEM 2.  FEES, COMMISSIONS AND EXPENSES.

                 The  estimated  fees,  commissions  and  expenses
           expected to be incurred in connection with the proposed
           transactions are as follows:

                Filing Fees:
                   Securities and Exchange Commission   $ 2,000

                Legal Fees:
                   Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP       10,000
                   Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll      1,000

                Miscellaneous                             5,000
                                              Total     $18,000

           2.   By   filing  the  following  exhibits  in  Item  6
 thereof:

                Exhibits:

                     A-1  -    Form  of  Promissory  Note   to  be
                               issued  by  Subsidiary  Company  to
                               GPU.

                     F-1  -    Opinion   of  Berlack,   Israels  &
                               Liberman LLP.

                     F-2  -    Opinion of Ballard Spahr  Andrews &
                               Ingersoll.


















                                 1
<PAGE>





                             SIGNATURE



           PURSUANT  TO  THE REQUIREMENTS  OF  THE  PUBLIC UTILITY

 HOLDING COMPANY  ACT OF  1935, THE  UNDERSIGNED COMPANY HAS  DULY

 CAUSED  THIS  STATEMENT  TO  BE  SIGNED  ON  ITS  BEHALF  BY  THE

 UNDERSIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

                               GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION



                               By:______________________________
                                    T. G. Howson, Vice President
                                    and Treasurer


 Date:  June 9, 1995
<PAGE>








              EXHIBITS TO BE FILED BY EDGAR



 Exhibits:


      A-1  -    Form  of  Promissory  Note to  be  issued  by
                Subsidiary Company to GPU.

      F-1  -    Opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP.

      F-2  -    Opinion of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll.
<PAGE>








                                                       EXHIBIT A-1



                        [SUBSIDIARY COMPANY]

                     UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE



                                                              19  

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the  undersigned ("Borrower") promises to pay
 to  the order of General Public  Utilities Corporation ("GPU") at
 its office at  100 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, New  Jersey, on
 or  before the maturity date  of             the unpaid principal
 balance hereof together with accrued interest.  Interest from the
 date funds are credited to Borrower's account shall accrue on the
 unpaid principal balance  at                    calculated on the
 actual number of days elapsed.  

 IN WITNESS HEREOF,  the undersigned has  duly executed this  Note
 the date and year first above written.

                                    [SUBSIDIARY COMPANY]

                                    BY:                           

                                    NAME:                         

                                    TITLE:                        
<PAGE>








          (LETTERHEAD OF BERLACK, ISRAELS & LIBERMAN LLP)

                                                       Exhibit F-1









                                    June 9, 1995


 Securities and Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
 Washington, D.C.  20549

           Re:  General Public Utilities Corporation
                Application on Form U-1
                SEC File No. 70-8593                

 Ladies and Gentlemen:

           We  have examined  the Application  on Form  U-1, dated
 March 15, 1995, under  the Public Utility Holding Company  Act of
 1935  ("Act"),  filed  by  General  Public Utilities  Corporation
 ("GPU"),  a Pennsylvania  corporation,  with  the Securities  and
 Exchange  Commission   ("Commission"),   and  docketed   by   the
 Commission in SEC File No. 70-8593, as amended by Amendment No. 1
 thereto, dated March 22, 1995, and Amendment No. 2 thereto, dated
 April 14,  1995, and as to be amended by Amendment No. 3 thereto,
 dated this  date, of which  this opinion is  to be a  part.  (The
 Application,  as so  amended  and  as  thus  to  be  amended,  is
 hereinafter referred to as the "Application").

           The  Application  contemplates,  among   other  things:
 (i) the  acquisition  by  GPU  of  the  capital  stock  or  other
 securities ("Subsidiary Securities")  of one  or more  subsidiary
 companies (each, a "Subsidiary Company") to be formed  which will
 be engaged in  the business  of, among other  things, owning  the
 interests and  securities of foreign utility  companies ("FUCOs")
 and/or  exempt wholesale  generators  ("EWGs") (each,  an "Exempt
 Entity"); (ii) the investment by GPU in such Subsidiary Companies
 from  time  to time  through December  31,  1997 in  an aggregate
 amount of up to  $200 million, which investment may take the form
 of, among other things,  guarantees or other similar undertakings
 of   GPU  ("Subsidiary  Guarantees"),   or  loans   evidenced  by
 promissory notes  of the Subsidiary Company  ("Subsidiary Company
 Notes");  (iii) the entering into by GPU of guarantees or similar
 undertakings of  obligations of  Exempt Entities  ("Exempt Entity
 Guarantees"); and (iv) the issuance by each Subsidiary Company of
 equity and debt  securities to persons other  than GPU in one  or
 more transactions from time to time in an aggregate  amount of up
 to $500 million ("Additional Subsidiary Securities"). 
<PAGE>
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 June 9, 1995
 Page 2

           We have  been counsel to  GPU and its  subsidiaries for
 many  years.  In that connection, we have participated in various
 proceedings relating to the issuance of securities by GPU and its
 subsidiaries,  and   we  are  familiar  with  the  terms  of  the
 outstanding  securities  of the  corporations comprising  the GPU
 holding company system.

           We are  members of the Bar of the State of New York and
 do not purport to be expert on the laws of any jurisdiction other
 than the laws  of the State of  New York and the  Federal laws of
 the  United States.  The opinions expressed herein are limited to
 matters governed by  the laws of  the State of  New York and  the
 Federal laws of  the United States.  As to  all matters which are
 governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, we have
 relied  on the opinion of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll which
 is being filed as Exhibit F-2 to the Application.

           We have  assumed that (i) each  Subsidiary Company will
 be  duly  formed and  validly  existing  in accordance  with  the
 respective  laws of  the  jurisdiction of  incorporation of  such
 Subsidiary  Company; (ii)  at  the  time  of their  issuance  and
 delivery,  the  Subsidiary  Securities,   Subsidiary  Guarantees,
 Subsidiary Company Notes, Exempt Entity Guarantees and Additional
 Subsidiary Securities  will have  been duly  authorized, executed
 and  delivered  by  the  issuer  thereof;  (iii)  the  execution,
 delivery and performance of each  Subsidiary Security, Subsidiary
 Guarantee, Subsidiary Company Note,  Exempt Entity Guarantee  and
 Additional  Subsidiary Security will  not violate  any applicable
 law  or any restriction imposed by any court or governmental body
 having  jurisdiction  over  the  issuer thereof;  and  (iv)  with
 respect to  any Subsidiary  Securities and  Additional Subsidiary
 Securities,  the issuer will have received consideration therefor
 at  least equal to the par or stated value (or equivalent amount)
 of such security.  

           Based upon  and subject to the  foregoing, and assuming
 that  the  transactions  therein  proposed  are  carried  out  in
 accordance  with the Application, we are of the opinion that when
 the Commission shall have entered an order forthwith granting the
 Application, 

           (a)  all State laws applicable to the proposed transac-
                tions will have been complied with,

           (b)  GPU is validly organized and existing,

           (c)  in  the   case   of  Subsidiary   Securities   and
                Additional Subsidiary  Securities which constitute
                equity securities, such securities will be validly
                issued, fully paid and nonassessable,  
<PAGE>
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 June 9, 1995
 Page 3

           (d)  in  the  case  of (i)  Subsidiary  Securities  and
                Additional Subsidiary  Securities which constitute
                debt  securities,  (ii) Subsidiary  Company Notes,
                and (iii) Subsidiary  Guarantees and Exempt Entity
                Guarantees, such  instruments  will be  valid  and
                binding obligations of  the respective issuers  or
                guarantors thereof in accordance with their terms,
                subject   to   the   effect   of   any  applicable
                bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent
                conveyance,  moratorium  or  other   similar  laws
                affecting creditors' rights generally  and general
                principles  of equity limiting the availability of
                equitable remedies, 

           (e)  GPU will legally acquire the Subsidiary Securities
                and Subsidiary Company Notes, and 

           (f)  the consummation of  the transactions proposed  in
                the Application will not violate  the legal rights
                of the holders of any securities issued  by GPU or
                any "associate company" thereof, as defined in the
                Act.

           We hereby consent to  the filing of this opinion  as an
 exhibit  to the  Application  and in  any proceedings  before the
 Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                               Very truly yours,


                               BERLACK, ISRAELS & LIBERMAN LLP
<PAGE>








         (LETTERHEAD OF BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL)

                                                       Exhibit F-2










                                    June 9, 1995



 Securities and Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
 Washington, D.C.  20549

           Re:  General Public Utilities Corporation
                Application on Form U-1
                SEC File No. 70-8593                

 Ladies and Gentlemen:

           We  have examined  the Application  on Form  U-1, dated
 March 15, 1995, under the  Public Utility Holding Company Act  of
 1935  ("Act"),  filed  by  General  Public  Utilities Corporation
 ("GPU"),  a Pennsylvania  corporation,  with  the Securities  and
 Exchange   Commission  ("Commission"),   and   docketed  by   the
 Commission in SEC File No. 70-8593, as amended by Amendment No. 1
 thereto,  dated March 22,  1995, Amendment  No. 2  thereto, dated
 April 14, 1995, and Amendment No. 3  thereto, dated this date, of
 which  this opinion is a part.   (The Application, as so amended,
 is hereinafter referred to as the "Application").

           The  Application contemplates, among other things:  (i)
 the acquisition by GPU  of the capital stock or  other securities
 ("Subsidiary  Securities") of  one or  more  subsidiary companies
 (each, a "Subsidiary Company") to be formed which will be engaged
 in  the business of, among other things, owning the interests and
 securities of  foreign utility companies  ("FUCOs") and/or exempt
 wholesale generators  ("EWGs") (each,  an "Exempt  Entity"); (ii)
 the investment by GPU  in such Subsidiary Companies from  time to
 time  through December 31, 1997 in  an aggregate amount  of up to
 $200  million, which investment may take the form of, among other
 things,   guarantees  or  other   similar  undertakings   by  GPU
 ("Subsidiary Guarantees"), or loans evidenced by promissory notes
 of the Subsidiary Company ("Subsidiary Company Notes"); (iii) the
 entering into  by GPU  of guarantees  or similar undertakings  of
 obligations  of Exempt Entities ("Exempt Entity Guarantees"); and
 (iv) the issuance by  each Subsidiary Company of equity  and debt
 securities  to persons other than GPU in one or more transactions
 from time  to time in an  aggregate amount of up  to $500 million
 ("Additional Subsidiary Securities").
<PAGE>
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 June 9, 1995
 Page 2



           We have been Pennsylvania counsel to GPU and certain of
 its  subsidiaries  for  many  years.   In  connection  with  this
 opinion,  we  have  examined   such  documents,  instruments  and
 agreements and have  made such further  investigation as we  have
 deemed necessary as a basis for this opinion.

           We have  assumed that (i) each  Subsidiary Company will
 be duly  formed  and  validly  existing in  accordance  with  the
 respective  laws of  the  jurisdiction of  incorporation of  such
 Subsidiary Company;  (ii)  at  the time  of  their  issuance  and
 delivery,  the  Subsidiary  Securities,   Subsidiary  Guarantees,
 Subsidiary Company Notes, Exempt Entity Guarantees and Additional
 Subsidiary Securities will  have been  duly authorized,  executed
 and  delivered  by  the  issuer  thereof;  (iii)  the  execution,
 delivery and performance of each Subsidiary  Security, Subsidiary
 Guarantee, Subsidiary  Company Note, Exempt Entity  Guarantee and
 Additional Subsidiary  Security will not  violate any  applicable
 law  or any restriction imposed by any court or governmental body
 having jurisdiction over  the issuer thereof or any instrument or
 agreement to which  GPU or its subsidiaries is a  party; and (iv)
 with  respect  to  any   Subsidiary  Securities  and   Additional
 Subsidiary    Securities,   the   issuer   will   have   received
 consideration  therefor at least equal to the par or stated value
 (or equivalent amount) of such security.

           Based upon  and subject to the  foregoing, and assuming
 that  the  transactions  therein  proposed  are  carried  out  in
 accordance with the Application, we are of the opinion insofar as
 matters of Pennsylvania law apply  that when the Commission shall
 have entered an order forthwith granting the Application, 

           (a)  all Pennsylvania  laws applicable to  the proposed
                transactions will have been complied with,

           (b)  GPU is validly organized and existing,

           (c)  the  Subsidiary  Guarantees   and  Exempt   Entity
                Guarantees will  be valid and  binding obligations
                of GPU in accordance  with their terms, subject to
                the   effect   of   any   applicable   bankruptcy,
                insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance,
                moratorium   or   other  similar   laws  affecting
                creditors' rights generally and general principles
                of equity  limiting the availability  of equitable
                remedies, 

           (d)  GPU will legally acquire the Subsidiary Securities
                and Subsidiary Company Notes, and
<PAGE>

 Securities and Exchange Commission
 June 9, 1995
 Page 3



           (e)  the consummation of  the transactions proposed  in
                the Application will not  violate the legal rights
                of the  holders of  any securities issued  by GPU,
                Pennsylvania  Electric Company,  Penelec Preferred
                Capital,  Inc., Penelec  Capital, L.P.  or Ninevah
                Water Company.

           We hereby consent to  the filing of this opinion  as an
 exhibit  to the  Application and  in  any proceedings  before the
 Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                               Very truly yours,



                               BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL
<PAGE>



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission