GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP /PA/
U-1/A, 1995-02-14
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORP /DE/, SC 13G/A, 1995-02-14
Next: GENERAL SIGNAL CORP, SC 13G, 1995-02-14









                                                       Amendment No 2 to
                                                       SEC File No. 70-8409

                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                WASHINGTON, DC  20549

                                       FORM U-1

                                     DECLARATION

                                        UNDER

                THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 ("Act")

                    JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ("JCP&L")
                                  300 Madison Avenue
                            Morristown, New Jersey  07960

                        METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ("Met-Ed")
                                 2800 Pottsville Pike
                             Reading, Pennsylvania  19640

                      PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY ("Penelec")
                                  1001 Broad Street
                            Johnstown, Pennsylvania  15907

                     GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION ("GPU")
                                100 Interpace Parkway
                            Parsippany, New Jersey  07054        
                    (Names of companies filing this statement and
                      addresses of principal executive offices)

                         GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION             
            (Name of top registered holding company parent of applicants)

          T. G. Howson, Vice                 W. Edwin Ogden, Esq.
          President and Treasurer            Ryan, Russell, Ogden & Seltzer
          M. A. Nalewako, Secretary          1100 Berkshire Boulevard
          GPU Service Corporation            P.O. Box 6219
          100 Interpace  Parkway             Reading, Pennsylvania 19610
          Parsippany, New Jersey 07054

          Richard S. Cohen, Esq.             Robert C. Gerlach, Esq.
          Jersey Central Power & Light       Ballard Spahr Andrews &
          Company                            Ingersoll
          300 Madison Avenue                 1735 Market Street
          Morristown, New Jersey 07960       Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

                                   Douglas E. Davidson, Esq.
                                   Berlack, Israels & Liberman
                                   120 West 45th Street
                                   New York, New York  10036               
                                                                           
                     (Names and addresses of agents for service)<PAGE>





               GPU, JCP&L,  Met-Ed and  Penelec amend their  Declaration on

          Form U-1, as  heretofore amended,  docketed in SEC  File No.  70-

          8409, as follows:

               1.  By amending paragraph J of Item 1 thereof to read in its

          entirety as follows:

                   J.    The  GPU  Companies   believe  that  the  combined

                   operation  of  the GPU  System's  non-nuclear generation

                   facilities will  result in future efficiencies  and cost

                   reductions.  Among other things, it is expected that the

                   formation of GPUGC will lead to a reduction of more than

                   150  jobs by  the end  of 1996,  resulting in  projected

                   annual savings  in  excess  of  $10 million.    The  GPU

                   Companies also  estimate that  up  to approximately  $10

                   million in  additional annual  savings will be  achieved

                   through  economies of  scale, improved  interaction with

                   suppliers,  the implementation  of  new  procedures  for

                   procuring  fuels, materials, supplies  and services, and

                   improvements in station  production, availability,  heat

                   rates, environmental matters and safety.  Other savings,

                   which cannot be quantified at this time, are expected to

                   be  realized from  other  operating  initiatives  to  be

                   implemented  by GPUGC, such as performance improvements,

                   operation  of plants  as individual  profit centers  and

                   improved utilization of the work force through training,

                   restructuring and revised job descriptions.  As noted in

                   paragraph  E of Item 1, to the extent practicable, costs

                   will be determined and  accumulated and allocated to the

                   GPU Company  owner of the particular generation facility

                                          1<PAGE>





                   to  which the services relate.  To the extent that costs

                   are not  directly allocable  to a  particular generation

                   facility,  such costs  will be  allocated among  the GPU

                   Companies  in the  same proportion  as the  direct costs

                   (less  fuel) are  allocated,  except that  a  relatively

                   minor  portion  of  such   costs  may  be  allocated  in

                   accordance with one of the allocation formulae listed on

                   Exhibit I hereto, if one of such formulae is deemed more

                   appropriate for a particular cost.

               2.  By  amending Item 2 thereof  to read in  its entirety as

          follows:

          ITEM 2.  FEES, COMMISSIONS AND EXPENSES.

                   The estimated fees, commissions and expenses expected to

          be incurred in connection with  the proposed transactions are  as

          follows:


                    Filing fees - Securities and Exchange
                      Commission                                   $ 2,000 
                    Legal fees:
                      Berlack, Israels & Liberman                   70,000 
                      Richard S. Cohen, Esq.                         2,000 
                      Ryan, Russell, Ogden & Seltzer                 8,500 
                      Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll              7,500 
                    Miscellaneous                                   10,000 
                      Total                                       $100,000 


               3.   By filing the following exhibits in Item 6(a) thereof:

                    (a)  Exhibits:

                         D-1(a)    Copy  of  Order  and  clarifying  Order,

                                   dated  December 28, 1994 and February 8,

                                   1995, respectively, of New  Jersey Board

                                   of Public Utilities.



                                          2<PAGE>





                         D-2(a)    Copy   of   Opinion  and   Order,  dated

                                   September 1, 1994, of PAPUC.

                         F-1       Opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman.

                         F-2       Opinion of Richard S. Cohen, Esq.

                         F-3       Opinion  of  Ryan,   Russell,  Ogden   &

                                   Seltzer.

                         F-4       Opinion  of  Ballard  Spahr   Andrews  &

                                   Ingersoll.

                         I         Alternative Allocation Formulae







































                                          3<PAGE>





                                      SIGNATURES

                    PURSUANT  TO THE  REQUIREMENTS  OF  THE PUBLIC  UTILITY

          HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935, THE UNDERSIGNED COMPANIES  HAVE DULY

          CAUSED  THIS  STATEMENT  TO BE  SIGNED  ON  THEIR  BEHALF BY  THE

          UNDERSIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.



                                   GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION
                                   JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
                                   METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
                                   PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY




                                   BY:                                 
                                        T.  G.  Howson, Vice  President and
                                        Treasurer


          Date:  February 14, 1995<PAGE>








                            EXHIBITS TO BE FILED BY EDGAR


               Exhibits:

                         D-1(a)    Copy  of  Order  and  clarifying  Order,
                                   dated  December 28, 1994 and February 8,
                                   1995, respectively, of New  Jersey Board
                                   of Public Utilities.

                         D-2(a)    Copy   of   Opinion  and   Order,  dated
                                   September 1, 1994, of PAPUC.

                         F-1       Opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman.

                         F-2       Opinion of Richard S. Cohen, Esq.

                         F-3       Opinion  of  Ryan,   Russell,  Ogden   &
                                   Seltzer.

                         F-4       Opinion  of  Ballard  Spahr   Andrews  &
                                   Ingersoll.

                         I         Alternative Allocation Formulae<PAGE>







                                                             Exhibit D-1(a)
                                                      Agenda Date: 11/21/94

                                 State of New Jersey
                              Board of Public Utilities
                                  Two Gateway Center
                                  Newark, N.J. 07102

                                                                   Electric

          IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF   )
          JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT     )           DECISION AND ORDER
          COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF AN         )
          OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH GPU       )        DOCKET NO. EE94030079
          GENERATION CORPORATION.            )

                               (SERVICE LIST ATTACHED)

          BY THE BOARD:

               Jersey Central  Power and Light Company  (JCP&L, Company, or
          Petitioner)  is  a  wholly  owned subsidiary  of  General  Public
          Utilities Corporation  (GPU) which provides  electric service  to
          various portions of the State of New Jersey.  Metropolitan Edison
          Corporation  (Met-Ed) and Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec)
          are also  wholly owned subsidiaries  of GPU and  provide electric
          service to certain portions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

               On  March  24,  1994,  JCP&L  filed  a  petition  requesting
          approval  to combine  the operations  of all  of the  GPU systems
          fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, and  natural gas) and hydroelectric
          generation  facilities into a single unified management structure
          know as GPU Generation Corporation (GPUGC).  GPUGC will also be a
          wholly owned subsidiary of GPU.

               JCP&L owns  all or part of seven (7) fossil fuel and one (1)
          hydroelectric   generating  facilities.    Those  facilities  are
          located in certain localities in the State of  New Jersey and the
          Commonwealth of  Pennsylvania and have  a net summer  capacity of
          1,959 megawatts  (MW).  Met-Ed  owns all or  part of twelve  (12)
          fossil  fuel  and  one (1)  hydroelectric  generating facilities.
          Those  facilities are also  located in certain  localities in the
          State of New Jersey and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and have
          a  net summer capacity of 1,209 MW.   Penelec owns all or part of
          nine  (9)  fossil fuel  and  three  (3) hydroelectric  generating
          facilities  in certain localities in the States of New Jersey and
          Maryland  and  in  the   Commonwealth  of  Pennsylvania.    Those
          facilities have  a net  summer capacity  of 2,091  MW.   With one
          exception, all of the<PAGE>





          foregoing generating  stations are  currently operated  by either
          JCP&L, Met-Ed, or Penelec.(1)

               JCP&L, Met-Ed, and Penelec jointly own the 786 MW Three Mile
          Island   (TMI)   nuclear   generating  station   in   Middletown,
          Pennsylvania.   JCP&L owns the 610 MW Oyster Creek (Oyster Creek)
          nuclear  generating station  that is  located in  Lacey Township,
          Ocean County, New  Jersey.  By order  dated October 14,  1981, in
          Docket No.  804-254,  the Board  approved  the formation  of  GPU
          Nuclear Corporation (GPUNC).  GPUNC is a wholly owned  subsidiary
          of GPU and currently operates and maintains both Oyster Creek and
          TMI  pursuant to  the terms  of an  operating agreement  that was
          approved by the Board in  the foregoing Order.  The  petition for
          the  instant  matter  requests  authorization  to reorganize  the
          Company's  non-nuclear  generating  facilities  in  a  comparable
          fashion.

               N.J.S.A 48:3-7.1 provides in pertinent part that 

                    "no  management,  advisory  service,   construction  or
                    engineering contract  ...  made by  any public  utility
                    with  any  person  or corporation  owning,  holding  or
                    controlling separately, or  in affiliation with another
                    person  or corporation,  five  percent or  more of  the
                    capital stock or such public utility ... shall be valid
                    or effective until approved in writing by the Board."

                    The foregoing Statute also provides that:

                    "The  [B]oard  shall  disapprove  such  contract  if it
                    determines that such contract violates the laws of this
                    state or of  the United  States, or that  the price  or
                    fair compensation thereby fixed exceeds  the fair price
                    or fair  compensation for the property  to be furnished
                    or the work to be  done or the services to  be rendered
                    thereunder  or  is  contrary to  the  public  interest:
                    otherwise the Board shall approve such contract."

               The   Petitioner  maintains  that  the  basic  objective  of
               establishing GPUGC is to  enable the customers of  the three
               GPU  utilities to  have  long-term, reliable  access to  the
               lowest cost energy and  capacity reasonably achievable.  The
               Company believes  that the  combination of the  GPU System's
               non-nuclear  generation  operations   will  enable  the  GPU
               companies  to  increase  efficiency,  improve  productivity,
               enhance  performance  and compete  more  effectively in  the
               emerging  competitive   environment,  ultimately  benefiting
               JCP&L's customers by the  resulting cost controls,  improved
               quality,  efficiency and  competitive  pricing  of  electric
               energy and customer service.

                         
          1.   York Haven Power Company, which is a wholly owned subsidiary
               of Met-Ed, owns and  operates one (1) hydroelectric facility
               in  the   Commonwealth  of  Pennsylvania.     Its  operating
               statistics are included in Met-Ed's net summer capacity.
<PAGE>






               GPU,  JCP&L,  Met-Ed and  Penelec propose  to enter  into an
          operating agreement  ("Operating Agreement") with  GPUGC, wherein
          GPUGC would undertake the operation and maintenance of all of the
          GPU  Companies' non-nuclear generation facilities, with ownership
          of  the facilities  to be  retained by  the individual  operating
          companies.(2)  This arrangement is similar to  the one previously
          approved by the Board with respect to  GPUNC and the GPU systems'
          nuclear  generating facilities.    GPUGC's main  offices will  be
          maintained in Johnstown, Pennsylvania.

               JCP&L,  Met-Ed and Penelec  will maintain existing oversight
          of their respective companies' generation and operations, GPUGC's
          capital and operating budgets and expenses will be subject to the
          companies' each individual company's  review and approval.  GPUGC
          will  not procure  title  to or  ownership  interest in  the  GPU
          companies' generation facilities or their electrical output.

               Under the  terms of the  Operating Agreement, GPUGC  will be
          responsible for the:

               a)   Safe and  economical operation  and maintenance  of the
                    existing non-nuclear generation facilities;

               b)   The design,  construction and start-up of  any new non-
                    nuclear generation facilities;

               c)   Budgeting, accounting and other data collection;

               d)   Customary   generation   support  activities   such  as
                    procurement of materials,  supplies, outside  services,
                    fuel purchasing and fuel supplies as requested.

               Following an  extensive  discovery process  and  conferences
          between  JCP&L,  Electric  Division  Staff and  the  Division  of
          Ratepayer  Advocate,  the  parties  entered  into  a  Stipulation
          recommending approval of  the Operating Agreement  between JCP&L,
          GPU, Met-Ed, Penelec and GPUGC.

               Staff believes that the Stipulation represents  a reasonable
          resolution of the  issues in this  proceeding and recommends  its
          approval subject to the conditions set forth therein.

               Based upon a  complete review of  the Company's filing,  and
          its correspondence and responses to discovery requests, the Board
          FINDS that  the Operating Agreement  is not unreasonable  and not
          contrary to the  public interest  and is in  accordance with  the
          law.  Moreover, we believe that with the  consolidated management
          structure, JCP&L has  the opportunity to realize the  benefits of
          enhanced efficiencies  and thereby ultimately reduce  its cost to
          ratepayers.  Further, we believe that the conditions embodied in

               
          2.   As  indicated in  the  previous footnote,  York Haven  Power
          Company (YHP) is  a wholly  owned subsidiary of  Met-Ed.   Met-Ed
          will execute the Operating Agreement on behalf of YHP.

                                               3
<PAGE>






          the  Stipulation  provide  important  ratepayer  protections  and
          continued regulatory  oversight.  Accordingly,  the Board concurs
          with  Staff's recommendation  and HEREBY  APPROVES the  Operating
          Agreement between JCP&L, GPU,  Met-Ed, Penelec and GPUGC, subject
          to the terms and conditions set forth in the attached Stipulation
          of the parties  as well as those  set forth herein below.   In so
          doing,  we note that the  proposed Operating Agreement with GPUGC
          will not alter the level of existing plant ownership by JCP&L and
          JCP&L will  continue to  have a  voice in  the management  of its
          fossil  fuel and  hydroelectric generating  stations.   We expect
          that  all charges  by  GPUGC under  the  terms of  the  Operating
          Agreement will  be at actual  cost, fairly and  equitably charged
          and  allocated and  will  not  exceed  the  fair  price  or  fair
          compensation for the property and services rendered.   We believe
          that the actual  attainment of cost efficiencies and  the ability
          to  compete  aggressively   in  today's  competitive   generation
          environment holds  the potential for greater  financial stability
          for the Company and lower rates for JCP&L ratepayers.

               This Order  is issued subject to the following provisions as
          specifically provided for in the Stipulation:

               1.   JCP&L shall  file with the  New Jersey Board  of Public
                    Utilities (Board) a letter stating the following:

                         Notwithstanding the filing with the Securities and
                         Exchange  Commission  (SEC),  and/or  the  Federal
                         Energy    Regulatory    Commission   (FERC),    if
                         applicable, or approval by the SEC and/or the FERC
                         of the  operating agreement between  GPUGC and the
                         GPU  Companies, JCP&L  agrees  that  is shall  not
                         assert,   in   any   administrative,   regulatory,
                         judicial or quasi-judicial forum, that such filing
                         in any way preempts the New Jersey Board of Public
                         Utilities' ability  to  review and  rule upon  the
                         prudence, reasonableness, and the  utility's right
                         to recovery in its  retail rates of costs incurred
                         by JCP&L under the Operating Agreement.

               2.   JCP&L   shall   submit   to   the  Board,   a   written
                    certification  executed  by  an authorized  officer  of
                    JCP&L  stating that  it is  JCP&L's intention  that the
                    letter immediately referenced above will be enforceable
                    in future regulatory proceedings.

               3.   This order shall  not affect  or in any  way limit  the
                    exercise  of the authority of the Board or of the State
                    in  any  future  petition  or in  any  proceeding  with
                    respect  to  rates,  franchises,   services,  financing
                    capitalization, depreciation,  accounting, maintenance,
                    operations or any other matter affecting GPUGC,  JCP&L,
                    and the BPU.

               4.   The Board of Directors of GPUGC shall  agree in writing
                    to the terms and conditions of this Order.

                                          4
<PAGE>





               5.   Approval of  the Operating Agreement does  not preclude
                    the   Board  from   investigating  during   any  formal
                    proceeding,  or from  conducting an  inquiry into,  the
                    reasonableness  of charges incurred under the Operating
                    Agreement.

               6.   It  should  be emphasized  that  this  Board has  ample
                    statutory authority to  regulate all utility activities
                    in this State, and if  required by then existing  facts
                    or  circumstances, to  take reasonable  and appropriate
                    action.   Approval  of  the formation  of GPUGC  cannot
                    alter or diminish  Board's pervasive regulation of  and
                    jurisdiction  over all  New Jersey  utility operations,
                    including  rates,  service and  assets.    In order  to
                    assure the  continuation of  safe, adequate  and proper
                    service, the activities of the Company will continue to
                    be  subject  to  ongoing  surveillance  by  this  Board
                    pursuant  to  Title  48  of  the  New  Jersey  Statutes
                    Annotated, including, but not limited to N.J.S.A. 48:2-
                    13,      N.J.S.A.  48:2-29.1,      N.J.S.A.  48:2-29.2,
                    N.J.S.A.  48:3-7,  N.J.S.A.  48:3-7.1,   N.J.S.A. 48:3-
                    7.2,  N.J.S.A. 48:3-9  and  N.J.S.A. 48:3-10.

               7.   The  Operating Agreement  will not  affect the  Board's
                    jurisdiction over all plant activities and safety.

               8.   Full access shall be  provided to the BPU to  any books
                    and   records  and  other   information  of  any  kind,
                    documentary  or  otherwise,  of  GPUGC or  any  of  its
                    divisions or subsidiaries.

               9.   GPUGC   shall  maintain   its  books  and   records  in
                    accordance  with  the  appropriate  Uniform  System  of
                    Accounts as prescribed by  this Board, provided that in
                    the  event  of  any  conflict in  connection  with  the
                    accounting rules prescribed by the  Pennsylvania Public
                    Utility Commission (PaPUC) with those required by  this
                    Board. JCP&L or GPUGC  shall notify the Board Staff  of
                    the conflict  in accounting rules  as soon as  JCP&L or
                    GPUGC becomes  aware of the conflict  in the accounting
                    rules  of the New Jersey Board  of Public Utilities and
                    the PaPUC.  The Board's Staff shall coordinate with the
                    PaPUC's  Staff to  reconcile  such conflicts  so as  to
                    reach a consistent system of accounting for GPUGC.

               10.  JCP&L  shall file with the  Board a signed  copy of the
                    executed Operating Agreement between GPUGC, JCP&L, Met-
                    Ed and Penelec within ten working days of its effective
                    date.

               11.  JCP&L  shall also file a copy of all amendments made to
                    the  original Operating  Agreement  and  copies of  all
                    subsequent  Operating Agreements and the Board shall be
                    in receipt of  the amendments  or subsequent  Operating


                                          5
<PAGE>





                    Agreements  at  least  fifteen   days  prior  to  their
                    proposed effective date.

               12.  The terms and conditions  of the Operating Agreement as
                    actually executed by  and between GPUGC, JCP&L,  Met-Ed
                    and Penelec shall not be changed substantively from the
                    draft  Operating Agreement currently  on file  with the
                    Board.

               13.  JCP&L shall  file with this Board, and  the Board shall
                    be in receipt of, a copy of the final SEC approval with
                    respect to this Operating Agreement  within ten working
                    days of receipt of the approvals by JCP&L.  JCP&L shall
                    also  file with this Board copies of all future SEC and
                    FERC approvals  received by GPUGC that  affect JCP&L in
                    any way, within  ten working days of JCP&L's receipt of
                    same.

               14.  Once the Operating Agreement  is in effect, JCP&L shall
                    file with this Board a GPUGC quarterly operating report
                    containing   the  same  type   of  information  and  in
                    substantially  the same  format as  is currently  being
                    filed  by  JCP&L,   covering  its  existing  generation
                    facilities   and   including   data    on   generation,
                    transmission and energy purchases, actual and estimated
                    fuel  consumption  and fuel  inventory levels  for each
                    JCP&L generation unit or  station, unless and until the
                    Board directs otherwise.

               15.  GPUGC shall record costs and, to the extent applicable,
                    all allocations  of costs  billed to JCP&L  through the
                    Operating Agreement on a  per generating plant basis by
                    type  (steam,  hydraulic and  other) and  in sufficient
                    detail  to allow  the  Board to  analyze, evaluate  and
                    render  a  determination  as  to  their   fairness  and
                    reasonableness for ratemaking purposes.

               16.  Salaries for  GPUGC operations  charged to  JCP&L shall
                    continue to be subject to  ongoing review by this Board
                    as  to  their reasonableness  for  ratemaking purposes,
                    subject  to  the confidentiality  procedures previously
                    approved  and followed  by  the Board  with respect  to
                    personal data relating  to individual employees,  where
                    applicable.

               17.  Information regarding total  salary of GPUGC  employees
                    and, where available, employees of contractors hired by
                    GPUGC,  as well  as  allocations of  the employees'  or
                    contractors employees' total salary for which  JCP&L is
                    being billed shall be  maintained and made available to
                    the Board during each rate proceeding and upon request.

               18.  All SEC  and FERC  filings relating  to changes  in the
                    GPUGC  Operating Agreement cost  allocation formulas as
                    well as the  initial filing of  such formulas with  the

                                          6
<PAGE>





                    SEC  or other  such  matters affecting  JCP&L shall  be
                    submitted to  the Board or  its successors at  least 45
                    days prior to  submitting the filing to  the SEC and/or
                    FERC.   JCP&L  shall also  submit to  the Board  or its
                    successors, the workpapers associated with such SEC and
                    FERC  filing at least 45  days prior to  the formal SEC
                    and FERC  filing.   Copies of  all annual, periodic  or
                    other reports filed by GPUGC with the SEC or FERC shall
                    be contemporaneously submitted to the Board.

               19.  GPUGC and  JCP&L shall prepare data as requested by the
                    NJBPU or its successors.

               20.  JCP&L   shall  seek  to   prioritize  and  protect  the
                    interests  of JCP&L and its ratepayers just as if JCP&L
                    were operating  its generating units  on a  stand-alone
                    basis.   JCP&L shall  exercise diligent  oversight over
                    GPUGC  to insure  that JCP&L's facilities  are operated
                    and  maintained  in   accordance  with  the   Operating
                    Agreement's  terms.    During   regulatory  proceedings
                    before the Board or its successors,  JCP&L/GPUGC shall,
                    upon  request, provide information showing the benefits
                    to JCP&L and JCP&L ratepayers of establishing GPUGC and
                    maintaining  operations  under   the  GPUGC   Operating
                    Agreement.

               21.  The  Board's   or  its  successors'  approval  of  this
                    Operating  Agreement does not  reduce or  constrain any
                    existing   authority  the   Board  or   its  successors
                    currently  have   to  review  the   capital  costs  and
                    operating  and maintenance  expenses of  the generating
                    facilities.

               22.  While  it is understood that  most of the current JCP&L
                    generation  personnel  will  be transferred  to  GPUGC,
                    Board approval of this Operating Agreement is not to be
                    construed as  Board approval to erode  the JCP&L talent
                    pool through an inappropriate transfer of knowledge and
                    personnel to GPUGC.

               23.  JCP&L  will  not  seek   to  recover  from  New  Jersey
                    ratepayers  any  costs,  either  direct   or  indirect,
                    associated with utility operations for generating units
                    in  which JCP&L  does not  have an  ownership interest,
                    except  for power  production costs  related to  energy
                    purchased or transferred to  JCP&L in the normal course
                    of GPU System operations as is currently the case.

               24.  GPUGC will not obtain and JCP&L will not give GPUGC any
                    portion of JCP&L's ownership interest in any generating
                    station  without prior  approval  of the  Board or  its
                    successors.    Likewise,  GPUGC   will  not  obtain  an
                    ownership  interest in  any generating  station without
                    prior  notification   by  JCP&L  to  the   BPU  or  its
                    successor, and JCP&L will  also promptly advise the BPU

                                          7
<PAGE>





                    or its successor concerning the allocation of costs and
                    liabilities,  if  any,  from  such plants  to  the  GPU
                    Companies including JCP&L.

               25.  The level of insurance protection provided to JCP&L and
                    its ratepayers under JCP&L's existing insurance program
                    with respect to the non-nuclear generating  stations to
                    be  operated by GPUGC shall not decrease as a result of
                    JCP&L entering into this Operating Agreement.


               26.  JCP&L's anticipated liability with respect  to the non-
                    nuclear  generating stations  to be  operated  by GPUGC
                    shall  not increase as a result  of JCP&L entering into
                    this Operating Agreement.

               27.  JCP&L  will  maintain  a  full  accounting,  on  a  per
                    generating  plant basis  by type (steam,  hydraulic and
                    other)  where  applicable,  of  any  and  all  services
                    provided by JCP&L to GPUGC.

               28.  JCP&L agrees that it  will not seek or be  permitted to
                    receive  ratemaking  recovery  from New  Jersey  retail
                    ratepayers of any liability, costs or expenses it might
                    incur by  reason of the activities  undertaken by GPUGC
                    in connection with the operation or maintenance of non-
                    nuclear generations  facilities in which JCP&L does not
                    have  any  ownership interest.    With  respect to  any
                    expenses,  capital costs,  or other  costs of  any type
                    relating  to  any  liabilities  that  may  result  from
                    GPUGC's operation  of facilities  in which JCP&L  has a
                    partial ownership interest,  JCP&L agrees that  it will
                    not seek or be permitted to recover, through rates from
                    its customers, an  amount that would  be greater (on  a
                    percentage basis) than  JCP&L's percentage ownership of
                    the specific facility.

               29.  In  addition to  providing identified  data, documents,
                    reports  and notifications  to the  Board as  set forth
                    above.   JCP&L  agrees that  all such  information will
                    likewise be  submitted simultaneously to the New Jersey
                    Division of the Ratepayer Advocate.

            
          DATED: December 28, 1994           BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
                                             BY:

                                             /s/ Herbert H. Tate
                                             HERBERT H. TATE
                                             PRESIDENT

          (SEAL)                                  /s/ Carmen J. Armenti
                                             CARMEN J. ARMENTI
                                             COMMISSIONER


                                          8
<PAGE>





                                             /s/ Edward H. Salmon
                                             EDWARD H. SALMON
                                             COMMISSIONER
          ATTEST:

               /s/ Blossom A. Peretz
               BLOSSOM A. PERETZ
               SECRETARY


               I HEREBY CERTIFY that the 
               within document is a true
               copy of the original in 
               the files of the Board of
               Public Utilities.

               /s/ Blossom A. Peretz
               BLOSSOM A. PERETZ, ESQ.
               SECRETARY





































                                          9
<PAGE>





                                                      Agenda Date: 11/21/94

                                 State of New Jersey
                              Board of Public Utilities
                                  Two Gateway Center
                                  Newark, N.J. 07102

                                                                   Electric

          IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF   )       ORDER CLARIFYING FINAL
          JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT     )           DECISION AND ORDER
          COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF AN         )
          OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH GPU       )        DOCKET NO. EE94030079
          GENERATION CORPORATION.            )

                               (SERVICE LIST ATTACHED)


          BY THE BOARD:

               This Board, by  Order dated December 28,  1994, approved the
          March 24, 1994 petition  of Jersey Central Power &  Light Company
          (JCP&L) to combine the  operations of all the GPU  systems fossil
          fuel  and  hydroelectric  generation  facilities  into  a  single
          unified  management structure  known as General  Public Utilities
          Generation  Corporation  (GPUGC).     GPUGC  is  a  wholly  owned
          subsidiary of General Public Utilities.  The Board's December 28,
          1994 Order adopted the  Revised Stipulation (attached), signed by
          representatives  of JCP&L,  Board  Staff and  the  Office of  the
          Ratepayer  Advocate  which  set  forth a  number  of  recommended
          conditions for Board approval of the Petition.

               By  letter dated January 5, 1995, Petitioner states that the
          Board's Order dated  December 28,  1994 in this  docket does  not
          accurately  reflect the  Revised  Stipulation signed  by all  the
          parties  and is seeking  an Order  of Clarification  adopting the
          terms of the Revised Stipulation as specifically set forth in the
          Revised Stipulation signed by all parties to this proceeding.

               This Order is written to clarify the fact that 1) it was and
          is  the Board's intent to approve  without modification the terms
          and conditions  of  the Revised  Stipulation  in this  docket  as
          specifically set forth  in the Revised Stipulation in this docket
          and  signed by  representatives  of JCP&L,  Board  Staff and  the
          Office  of the Ratepayer Advocate;  2) any divergence in verbiage
          as contained in our  December 28, 1994 Order versus  the specific
          language  set   forth  in   the  Revised  Stipulation   were  for
          descriptive  purposes only, and it neither was nor is the Board's
          intent   to  modify,  in  any  way,  the  terms  of  the  Revised
          Stipulation; and 3) the Board APPROVES the Revised Stipulation in
          its entirety and incorporates same specifically by reference into
          its Order of Approval.<PAGE>






          DATED: February 8, 1995                 BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
                                                  BY:

                                                  /s/ Herbert H. Tate
                                                  HERBERT H. TATE
                                                  PRESIDENT

          (SEAL)                                  /s/ Carmen J. Armenti
                                                  CARMEN J. ARMENTI
                                                  COMMISSIONER

                                                  /s/ Edward H. Salmon
                                                  EDWARD H. SALMON
                                                  COMMISSIONER
          ATTEST:   /s/ Blossom A. Peretz
                    BLOSSOM A. PERETZ
                    SECRETARY

                    I HEREBY CERTIFY that the
                    within document is a true
                    copy of the original in
                    the files of the Board of
                    Public Utilities.

                    /s/ Blossom A. Peretz
                    BLOSSOM A. PERETZ, ESQ.
                    SECRETARY




























                                          2<PAGE>








                                                             Exhibit D-2(a)
                                     PENNSYLVANIA
                              PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
                              Harrisburg, PA. 17103-3265

                                     Public Meeting, held September 1, 1994

          Commissioners Present:

               David W. Rolka, Chairman
               Joseph Rhodes, Jr., Vice-Chairman
               John M. Quain
               Lisa Crutchfield
               John Kanger

          Affiliated Interest Agreement between                  Docket No.
          Metropolitan Edison Company,                           G009403687
          Pennsylvania Electric Company, Jersey
          Central Power and Light Company and
          GPU Generation Corporation

                                  OPINION AND ORDER

          BY THE COMMISSION:

               On  March  25,   1994,  an  Affiliated  Interest   Agreement
          ("Agreement")  between  Metropolitan  Edison Company  ("Met-Ed"),
          Pennsylvania Electric Company  ("Penelec"), Jersey Central  Power
          and Light ("JCP&L") and  GPU Generation Corporation ("GPUGC") was
          filed to become effective April 24, 1994.  On April 14, 1994, the
          period  for consideration  of this  Agreement was  extended until
          June 23, 1994.  As a result of negotiations between the office of
          Consumer Advocate ("OCA")  and Respondent, on June 16,  1994, the
          Commission  extended  the  period   for  consideration  of   this
          Agreement to September 23, 1994.

               This Agreement  provides for the  operation, maintenance and
          rehabilitation   by  GPUGC   of   various  non-nuclear   electric
          generation facilities which are  owned and/or operated by Met-Ed,
          Penelec and JCP&L.   It also provides for GPUGC  to construct any
          new  non-nuclear  electric  generation facilities  which  the GPU
          Companies  may require  in the  future.   The Agreement  will not
          affect the  Commission's jurisdiction  over all  plant activities
          and safety. 

               As  a result  of negations between  Respondent and  OCA with
          regards to  certain language in  the Agreement, the  parties have
          agreed to the following stipulation:<PAGE>





                    "Notwithstanding  the  filing  the   SEC,  or
                    approval,  by  the   SEC,  of  the  operating
                    agreement   between   GPUGC   and   the   GPU
                    Companies, Met-Ed and Penelec agree that they
                    shall not raise  such filing for the  purpose
                    of preempting the Pennsylvania Public Utility
                    Commission's  ability to review and rule upon
                    the  prudence, reasonableness,  and utility's
                    right  to recovery  in  its retail  rates  of
                    costs  incurred  by  the  utility  under  the
                    operating agreement."

               All  charges  between  and  among the  GPU  Companies,  with
          respect to services to be performed by GPUGC, will be at cost.

               A  question has arisen as  to any potential conflict between
          the instant agreement and  the Commission's upcoming revisions to
          its competitive bidding regulations at Section 1 Pa. Code Section
          57.31-87.28.   This issue is addressed in  ordering paragraph No.
          2.

               The Agreement  is filed in accordance  with the requirements
          of  Section 2102(b)  of  the Public  Utility  Code, 66  Pa.  C.S.
          2102(b).

               We have examined  the Agreement and have  determined that it
          appears to be reasonable and consistent with the public interest;
          however, approval  of the  Agreement  does not  preclude us  from
          investigating during any formal proceeding, the reasonableness of
          charges incurred under the Agreement; THEREFORE,

          IT IS ORDERED:

                    1.   That  the  Affiliated  Interest Agreement  between
          Met-Ed, Penelec, JCP&L and GPUGC be, and hereby is, approved.

                    2.   That if there is  any conflict between the instant
          Affiliated  Interest  Agreement  and upcoming  revisions  to  the
          Commission's competitive  bidding regulations  at  Section 2  Pa.
          Code  Section 57.31-57.39,  the  revised  Commission  regulations
          shall prevail.

                    3.   That acceptance does  not preclude the  Commission
          from   investigating    during   any   formal    proceeding   the
          reasonableness of charges incurred under the Agreement.

                                        BY THE COMMISSION


                                        John G. Alford,
                                        Secretary

          (SEAL)

          ORDER ADOPTED:  September 1, 1994

                                          2<PAGE>





          ORDER ENTERED:  SEP 1 1994























































                                          3<PAGE>







                                                                Exhibit F-1









                                                       February 14, 1995




          Securities and Exchange Commission
          450 Fifth Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C. 20549

                    Re:  General Public Utilities Corporation
                         Jersey Central Power & Light Company
                         Metropolitan Edison Company
                         Pennsylvania Electric Company
                         Declaration on Form U-1
                         SEC File No. 70-8409                

          Gentlemen:

                    We  have examined  the Declaration  on Form  U-1, dated
          April  5, 1994, under the  Public Utility Holding  Company Act of
          1935 (the  "Act"), filed by General  Public Utilities Corporation
          ("GPU"),  Jersey  Central   Power  &  Light   Company  ("JCP&L"),
          Metropolitan Edison Company ("Met-Ed") and  Pennsylvania Electric
          Company ("Penelec" and,  together with JCP&L and Met-Ed, the "GPU
          Companies") with  the  Securities and  Exchange  Commission  (the
          "Commission") and docketed in SEC File No. 70-8409, as amended by
          Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated May  10, 1994, and Amendment No. 2
          thereto, dated this date, of which  this opinion is to be a part.
          (The Declaration, as  so amended and  as thus to  be amended,  is
          hereinafter referred to as the "Declaration".)

                    The  Declaration contemplates, among  other things, the
          organization by GPU  of GPU Generation Corporation ("GPUGC") as a
          new,  wholly-owned  subsidiary   company,  which  will  undertake
          responsibility,   among   other   things,   for   the  operation,
          maintenance  and rehabilitation  of  all  non-nuclear  generation
          facilities owned and/or operated by the GPU Companies pursuant to
          an operating  agreement (the "Operating Agreement") between GPUGC
          and  the GPU Companies.   GPUGC may  also construct  any new non-
          nuclear generation facilities which the GPU Companies may require
          in the  future.   The Declaration further  contemplates that  GPU
          would  acquire for  cash all  of the  2,500 authorized  shares of
          GPUGC's  common stock, par value $20 per share (the "GPUGC Common
          Stock"),  for  a  price   of  $20  per  share  or   an  aggregate
          consideration  of $50,000  and would also  be authorized  to make
          open account advances to GPUGC from  time to time up to an amount
          outstanding at any time of not more than $1 million.<PAGE>





          Securities and Exchange Commission
          February 14, 1995
          Page 2


                    For  many   years,  we  have  participated  in  various
          proceedings related to the issuance and sale of securities by GPU
          and the GPU Companies, and we  are familiar with the terms of the
          outstanding securities of the corporations comprising the General
          Public Utilities holding company system.

                    We have examined copies, signed, certified or otherwise
          proven to our satisfaction, of the  Articles of Incorporation and
          By-Laws of  GPUGC, the Restated Certificate  of Incorporation and
          By-Laws of JCP&L  and the Restated Articles of  Incorporation and
          By-Laws of  each  of Met-Ed  and  Penelec,  and of  the  form  of
          Operating  Agreement.  We have also examined the filing made with
          the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("PaPUC") with respect
          to  the  Operating Agreement  and the  Opinion  and Order  of the
          PaPUC,  dated September 1, 1994, with respect thereto, as well as
          the  Petition filed  by  JCP&L  with  the  New  Jersey  Board  of
          Regulatory  Commissioners (now  the  New Jersey  Board of  Public
          Utilities  (the  "Board"))  with  respect  to  the   transactions
          contemplated  by  the  Declaration  and  the  Board's  Order  and
          clarifying  Order, dated December 28,  1994 and February 8, 1995,
          respectively,  with  respect  thereto.    In  addition,  we  have
          examined  such other  instruments, agreements  and  documents and
          made  such further investigation as we have deemed necessary as a
          basis for this opinion.

                    With  respect  to  all   matters  of  Pennsylvania  law
          involving  GPU, GPUGC, Penelec and JCP&L, we have relied upon the
          opinion of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, with respect to all
          matters of Pennsylvania law involving Met-Ed, we have relied upon
          the opinion of Ryan,  Russell, Ogden & Seltzer, and  with respect
          to all matters of  New Jersey law involving JCP&L, we have relied
          upon the opinion of Richard S. Cohen, Esq., which are being filed
          as Exhibits F-2, F-3 and F-4, respectively, to the Declaration.

                    Based  upon  the  foregoing,  and   assuming  that  the
          transactions therein proposed are  carried out in accordance with
          the  Declaration, we  are  of  the  opinion  that  when  (i)  the
          Commission  shall have  entered an  order forthwith  granting the
          Declaration, (ii) all necessary  corporate action required on the
          part  of GPU, the  GPU Companies and  GPUGC shall have  been duly
          taken, and (iii) GPU  shall have acquired the GPUGC  Common Stock
          for an aggregate consideration of $50,000 in cash,

                    (a)  all  State  laws applicable  to  the proposed
               transactions will have been complied with; 

                    (b)  GPUGC is validly organized and duly existing;

                    (c)  the  GPUGC  Common  Stock  will   be  validly
               issued, fully paid and  non-assessable, and GPU will be
               entitled  to  the  rights and  privileges  appertaining
               thereto set forth in GPUGC's Articles of Incorporation;<PAGE>






          Securities and Exchange Commission
          February, 14, 1995
          Page 3




                    (d)  GPU  will legally  acquire  the GPUGC  Common
               Stock; and 

                    (e)  the consummation of the proposed transactions
               will not violate the legal rights of the holders of any
               securities issued by GPU, the GPU Companies or GPUGC or
               any "associate company" thereof, as defined in the Act.

                    We hereby consent to  the filing of this opinion  as an
          exhibit  to the  Declaration and  in any  proceedings before  the
          Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                                        Very truly yours,



                                        BERLACK, ISRAELS & LIBERMAN<PAGE>








                                                       Exhibit F-2



                                             February 14, 1995


          Securities and Exchange Commission
          450 Fifth Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C. 20549

                    Re:  General Public Utilities Corporation
                         Jersey Central Power & Light Company
                         Metropolitan Edison Company
                         Pennsylvania Electric Company
                         Declaration on Form U-1
                         SEC File No. 70-8409                

          Gentlemen:

               I  have examined the Declaration on Form U-1, dated April 5,
          1994, under the Public  Utility Holding Company Act of  1935 (the
          "Act"), filed  by General Public  Utilities Corporation  ("GPU"),
          Jersey  Central Power  &  Light  Company ("JCP&L"),  Metropolitan
          Edison  Company  ("Met-Ed")  and  Pennsylvania  Electric  Company
          ("Penelec"  and,  together  with   JCP&L  and  Met-Ed,  the  "GPU
          Companies")  with  the  Securities and  Exchange  Commission (the
          "Commission") and docketed in SEC File No. 70-8409, as amended by
          Amendment  No. 1 thereto, dated May 10, 1994, and Amendment No. 2
          thereto, dated  this date, of which this opinion is to be a part.
          (The Declaration,  as so amended  and as  thus to be  amended, is
          hereinafter referred to as the "Declaration".)

               The   Declaration  contemplates,  among  other  things,  the
          organization by GPU of GPU  Generation Corporation ("GPUGC") as a
          new,  wholly-owned  subsidiary  company,  which   will  undertake
          responsibility,   among  other   things,   for   the   operation,
          maintenance  and  rehabilitation  of all  non-nuclear  generation
          facilities owned and/or operated by the GPU Companies pursuant to
          an operating agreement (the "Operating  Agreement") between GPUGC
          and the  GPU Companies.   GPUGC may  also construct any  new non-
          nuclear generation facilities which the GPU Companies may require
          in  the future.  The  Declaration further  contemplates that  GPU
          would  acquire for  cash all  of the  2,500 authorized  shares of
          GPUGC's  common stock, par value $20 per share (the "GPUGC Common
          Stock"),  for  a  price   of  $20  per  share  or   an  aggregate
          consideration  of $50,000  and would  also be authorized  to make
          open account  advances to GPUGC from time to time up to an amount
          outstanding at any time of not more than $1 million.

               For many  years, I have participated  in various proceedings
          related to the issuance and sale of securities by JCP&L, and I am
          familiar with the terms of the outstanding securities of JCP&L.

               I  have examined  copies,  signed,  certified  or  otherwise
          proven  to  my  satisfaction,  of  the  Restated  Certificate  of<PAGE>





          Incorporation  and By-Laws of JCP&L, each as amended to date, and
          the form of the 

          Securities and Exchange Commission
          February 14, 1995
          Page 2

          Operating  Agreement.  I have also examined the Petition filed by
          JCP&L with the New Jersey Board of  Regulatory Commissioners (now
          the New  Jersey Board  of  Public Utilities  (the "Board"))  with
          respect to the transactions  contemplated by the Declaration, and
          the Board's Order  and clarifying Order, dated  December 28, 1994
          and February 8,  1995, respectively,  with respect  thereto.   In
          addition, I have examined  such other instruments, agreements and
          documents  and made such  further investigation as  I have deemed
          necessary as a basis for this opinion.

               Based upon the foregoing, and assuming that the transactions
          therein  proposed   are  carried  out  in   accordance  with  the
          Declaration,  I am of the opinion, insofar as matters governed by
          the laws  of the State of New Jersey are concerned, that when (i)
          the Commission shall have entered an order forthwith granting the
          Declaration, (ii) all necessary  corporate action required on the
          part  of GPU,  the GPU Companies  and GPUGC shall  have been duly
          taken, and (iii) GPU  shall have acquired the GPUGC  Common Stock
          for an aggregate consideration of $50,000 in cash,

                    (a)  all laws of the State of New Jersey applicable  to
               the proposed transactions will have been complied with; and

                    (b)  the consummation of the proposed transactions will
               not violate  the legal rights  of holders of  any securities
               issued by JCP&L.

               I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
          to the Declaration and in  any proceedings before the  Commission
          that may be held in connection therewith.

                                        Very truly yours,





                                        Richard S. Cohen, Esquire<PAGE>







                                                                Exhibit F-3









                                             February 14, 1995



          Securities and Exchange Commission
          450 Fifth Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C. 20549

                    Re:  General Public Utilities Corporation
                         Jersey Central Power & Light Company
                         Metropolitan Edison Company
                         Pennsylvania Electric Company
                         Declaration on Form U-1
                         SEC File No. 70-8409             

          Gentlemen:

                    We  have examined  the Declaration  on Form  U-1, dated
          April  5, 1994, under the  Public Utility Holding  Company Act of
          1935 (the  "Act"), filed by General  Public Utilities Corporation
          ("GPU"),  Jersey   Central  Power  &  Light   Company  ("JCP&L"),
          Metropolitan Edison Company  ("Met-Ed") and Pennsylvania Electric
          Company  ("Penelec" and, together with JCP&L and Met-Ed, the "GPU
          Companies")  with  the  Securities and  Exchange  Commission (the
          "Commission") and docketed in SEC File No. 70-8409, as amended by
          Amendment No. 1 thereto,  dated May 10, 1994, and Amendment No. 2
          thereto, dated this date, of which this opinion is to  be a part.
          (The  Declaration, as so  amended and as  thus to  be amended, is
          hereinafter referred to as the "Declaration".)

                    The Declaration  contemplates, among other  things, the
          organization  by GPU of GPU Generation Corporation ("GPUGC") as a
          new,   wholly-owned  subsidiary  company,  which  will  undertake
          responsibility,   among   other   things,  for   the   operation,
          maintenance  and  rehabilitation  of  all  non-nuclear generation
          facilities owned and/or operated by the GPU Companies pursuant to
          an operating agreement (the "Operating  Agreement") between GPUGC
          and the  GPU Companies.   GPUGC may  also construct any  new non-
          nuclear generation facilities which the GPU Companies may require
          in the  future.  The  Declaration further  contemplated that  GPU
          would  acquire for  cash all  of the  2,500 authorized  shares of
          GPUGC's  common stock, par value $20 per share (the "GPUGC Common
          Stock"),  for  a  price   of  $20  per  share  or   an  aggregate
          consideration  of $50,000 and  would also  be authorized  to make
          open account advances to GPUGC from time to time up  to an amount
          outstanding at any time of not more than $1 million.<PAGE>





          Securities and Exchange Commission
          February 14, 1995
          Page 2




                    We have examined copies, signed, certified or otherwise
          proven  to   our  satisfaction,  of  the   Restated  Articles  of
          Incorporation and By-Laws of Met-Ed, and of the form of Operating
          Agreement.  We have  also participated in the preparation  of the
          filing  made  with  the  Pennsylvania Public  Utility  Commission
          ("PaPUC")  with  respect to  the  Operating Agreement.    We have
          examined the Opinion and  Order of the PaPUC, dated  September 1,
          1994, with respect thereto.   We are familiar with  the corporate
          history  of Met-Ed.   In  addition, we  have examined  such other
          instruments,  agreements  and  documents and  made  such  further
          investigation as we  have deemed  necessary as a  basis for  this
          opinion.

                    Based  upon  the  foregoing,  and  assuming   that  the
          transactions therein proposed are  carried out in accordance with
          the  Declaration, we  are  of  the  opinion  that  when  (i)  the
          Commission  shall have  entered an  order forthwith  granting the
          Declaration, (ii) all necessary  corporate action required on the
          part of  GPU, the GPU  Companies and  GPUGC shall have  been duly
          taken, and (iii) GPU  shall have acquired the GPUGC  Common Stock
          for an aggregate consideration of $50,000 in cash,

                    (a)  all  Pennsylvania  laws  applicable   to  Met-Ed's
               participation in  the proposed  transactions will  have been
               complied with; and

                    (b)  the consummation of the proposed transactions will
               not  violate  the  legal  rights   of  the  holders  of  any
               securities issued by Met-Ed.

                    We hereby consent to  the filing of this opinion  as an
          exhibit  to the  Declaration and  in any  proceedings before  the
          Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                                        Very truly yours,



                                        RYAN, RUSSELL, OGDEN & SELTZER<PAGE>







                                                                Exhibit F-4










                                             February 14, 1995



          Securities and Exchange Commission
          450 Fifth Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C.  20549

                    Re:  General Public Utilities Corporation
                         Jersey Central Power & Light Company
                         Metropolitan Edison Company
                         Pennsylvania Electric Company
                         Declaration on Form U-1
                         SEC File No. 70-8409                

          Gentlemen:

                    We  have examined  the Declaration  on Form  U-1, dated
          April  5, 1994, under the  Public Utility Holding  Company Act of
          1935 (the  "Act"), filed by General  Public Utilities Corporation
          ("GPU"),  Jersey  Central   Power  &  Light   Company  ("JCP&L"),
          Metropolitan Edison Company ("Met-Ed") and  Pennsylvania Electric
          Company ("Penelec" and,  together with JCP&L and Met-Ed, the "GPU
          Companies") with  the  Securities and  Exchange  Commission  (the
          "Commission") and docketed in SEC File No. 70-8409, as amended by
          Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated May  10, 1994, and Amendment No. 2
          thereto, dated this date, of which  this opinion is to be a part.
          (The Declaration, as  so amended and  as thus to  be amended,  is
          hereinafter referred to as the "Declaration").

                    The  Declaration contemplates, among  other things, the
          organization by GPU  of GPU Generation Corporation ("GPUGC") as a
          new,  wholly-owned  subsidiary   company,  which  will  undertake
          responsibility,   among   other   things,   for   the  operation,
          maintenance  and rehabilitation  of  all  non-nuclear  generation
          facilities owned and/or operated by the GPU Companies pursuant to
          an operating  agreement (the "Operating Agreement") between GPUGC
          and  the GPU Companies.   GPUGC may  also construct  any new non-
          nuclear generation facilities which the GPU Companies may require
          in the  future.   The Declaration further  contemplates that  GPU
          would  acquire for  cash all  of the  2,500 authorized  shares of
          GPUGC's  common stock, par value $20 per share (the "GPUGC Common
          Stock"),  for  a  price   of  $20  per  share  or   an  aggregate
          consideration  of $50,000  and would also  be authorized  to make
          open account advances to GPUGC from  time to time up to an amount
          outstanding at any time of not more than $1 million.<PAGE>





          Securities and Exchange Commission
          February 14, 1995
          Page 2

                    We  have  been  counsel  to  Penelec  and  Pennsylvania
          counsel to  GPU and JCP&L for  many years.  In  such capacity, we
          have examined  copies, signed,  certified or otherwise  proven to
          our satisfaction, of the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of
          GPUGC and the Restated Articles  of Incorporation and By-Laws  of
          Penelec, and of  the form of Operating  Agreement.  We have  also
          examined  the filing  made with  the Pennsylvania  Public Utility
          Commission ("PaPUC") with respect  to the Operating Agreement and
          the Opinion and Order of the PaPUC, dated September 1, 1994, with
          respect to the transactions contemplated by the Declaration.   In
          addition, we have examined such other instruments, agreements and
          documents  and made such further  investigation as we have deemed
          necessary as a basis for this opinion.

                    Based  upon  the  foregoing,  and   assuming  that  the
          transactions therein proposed are  carried out in accordance with
          the  Declaration, we are of  the opinion, insofar  as matters are
          governed by the  laws of the  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,  that
          when (i)  the Commission shall  have entered  an order  forthwith
          granting  the Declaration,  (ii) all  necessary corporate  action
          required on the part  of GPU, the GPU  Companies and GPUGC  shall
          have been duly taken, and (iii) GPU shall have acquired the GPUGC
          Common Stock for an aggregate consideration of $50,000 in cash,

                         (a)  all  Pennsylvania  laws  applicable   to  the
               proposed transactions by Penelec,  GPU, GPUGC and JCP&L will
               have been complied with;

                         (b)  GPUGC is validly organized and duly existing;

                         (c)  the  GPUGC  Common   Stock  will  be  validly
               issued,  fully  paid and  non-assessable,  and  GPU will  be
               entitled to  the rights and  privileges appertaining thereto
               set forth in GPUGC's Articles of Incorporation;

                         (d)  GPU  will  legally acquire  the  GPUGC Common
               Stock; and

                         (e)  the consummation of the proposed transactions
               will  not violate  the legal  rights of  the holders  of any
               securities  issued  by  GPU,  GPUGC,  Penelec  or  Penelec's
               wholly-owned subsidiary, Nineveh Water Company.

                    We hereby consent to  the filing of this opinion  as an
          exhibit  to  the Declaration  and in  any proceedings  before the
          Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL<PAGE>







                                                                       EXHIBIT I




                              ALTERNATIVE ALLOCATION FORMULAE


          Direct Labor Basis
          Under  this allocation method, each  plant would be  charged an amount
          based upon  the percentage of  direct labor billings by  plant for the
          preceding year.

          Employee Basis
          Under  this allocation method, each  plant would be  charged an amount
          based upon the percentage of average number of plant employees for the
          preceding year.

          Fuel Expense Basis
          Under  this allocation method, each  plant would be  charged an amount
          based upon the percentage  of fuel expense by plant for  the preceding
          year.

          Installed Capacity Rating (MW) Basis
          Under  this allocation method, each  plant would be  charged an amount
          based  upon the percentage of  installed capacity rating  by plant for
          the preceding year.<PAGE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission