GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP /PA/
U-1/A, 1997-01-14
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: GENERAL MICROWAVE CORP, 10-Q, 1997-01-14
Next: GYRODYNE COMPANY OF AMERICA INC, SC 13G/A, 1997-01-14










                                                         AMENDMENT NO. 1 to
                                                       SEC File No. 70-8967

                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                WASHINGTON, DC  20549

                                       FORM U-1

                                     DECLARATION

                                        UNDER

                THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 ("Act")

                                  GPU, INC. ("GPU")
                                100 Interpace Parkway
                            Parsippany, New Jersey  07054

                    JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ("JCP&L")
                        METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ("MET-ED")
                      PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY ("PENELEC")
                                 2800 Pottsville Pike
                             Reading, Pennsylvania 19605
                    (Names of companies filing this statement and
                      addresses of principal executive offices)

                                        GPU, INC.                          
            (Name of top registered holding company parent of applicants)


          Scott L. Guibord                      Douglas E. Davidson, Esq.
          Secretary                             Berlack, Israels & Liberman
          Jersey Central Power & Light Company  LLP
          Metropolitan Edison Company           120 West 45th Street
          Pennsylvania Electric Company         New York, New York  10036
          2800 Pottsville Pike
          Reading, Pennsylvania 19605

          M.A. Nalewako, Secretary
          Michael J. Connolly, Esq., Assistant
            General Counsel
          GPU Service, Inc.
          100 Interpace Parkway
          Parsippany, New Jersey  07054


                     (Names and addresses of agents for service)<PAGE>
               GPU, JCP&L, Met-Ed and Penelec hereby amend their Declaration

          on Form U-1, docketed in SEC File No. 70-8967, as follows:

               1.   By amending Item 1  thereof to read in its  entirety as
                    follows:

          Item 1.  Description of Proposed Transactions.

               A.   JCP&L,   Met-Ed,   and   Penelec   (collectively,   the
          "Operating Companies") are electric utility  subsidiaries of GPU,
          a  registered holding company.  The service territory of JCP&L is
          in New Jersey and  the service territories of Met-Ed  and Penelec
          are in Pennsylvania.
           
               B.   The  Operating  Companies  maintain insurance  policies
          that   provide  coverage  for  workers  compensation  claims,  as
          required  by  state law.    The policies  also  provide liability
          insurance coverage for employee  claims made directly against the
          Operating Companies.  Prior  to 1993, in the cases of  Met-Ed and
          Penelec,  and 1994, in the  case of JCP&L,  the policies required
          the  insurance company to pay all claims without a deductible and
          to  pay all expenses and costs, including legal fees, incurred in
          connection with  the  investigation,  defense  or  settlement  of
          claims.

               C.   In order  to reduce  premium costs, commencing  in 1993
          for  Met-Ed  and Penelec  and in  1994  for JCP&L,  the Operating
          Companies modified the policies  to provide for the payment  of a
          deductible for each claim,  up to a specified maximum  amount for
          all  claims in  the  calendar  year,  and  to  pay  the  expenses
          attributable  to  all  claims.     While  the  insurance  company
          continues to administer and  pay all claims and expenses  as they
          arise,  the Operating Companies  reimburse the  insurance company
          for the  amount of each claim  paid up to the  deductible and all
          expenses paid in such month.

               D.   The insurance  companies required,  as  a condition  to
          permitting the policies to be modified to provide for the payment
          of  the  deductible,  that  the Operating  Companies  deliver  an
          irrevocable bank  letter of  credit ("L/C") as  security for  the
          Operating   Companies    obligations  to   pay   the  deductible.
          Accordingly, by  Order dated April  14, 1993 (HCAR  No. 35-25793)
          ("1993 Order"),  Met-Ed and Penelec were  authorized, among other
          things, to enter into L/C reimbursement agreements with banks and
          to deliver  to their insurance company irrevocable bank L/Cs from
          time  to  time through  December 31,  1998.   The  aggregate face
          amount  of the  L/Cs delivered  by Met-Ed  and Penelec  would not
          exceed $20 million, provided that the L/Cs delivered on behalf of
          Met-Ed  or Penelec individually would not exceed $15 million.  In
          addition,  by  Order dated  March  15, 1994  (HCAR  No. 35-26003)
          ("1994  Order"), JCP&L  was  authorized, among  other things,  to
          enter into L/C reimbursement agreements with banks and to deliver
          to its insurance  company irrevocable bank  L/Cs in an  aggregate
          face amount  of  up to  $15  million from  time  to time  through
          December 31, 1998.
               E.   The Operating Companies now anticipate that it might be
          more efficient for the workers compensation insurance policies to
          cover, in addition  to their employees, the  Pennsylvania and New

<PAGE>
          Jersey employees of GPU Service, Inc., GPU Nuclear, Inc., and GPU
          Generation, Inc.,  which are subsidiary service  companies of GPU
          ("Service  Companies").  Accordingly, it will now be necessary to
          furnish  L/Cs   to  the   insurance  companies  to   support  the
          obligations of the  Service Companies to pay  the deductible with
          respect  to claims, as well  as the obligations  of the Operating
          Companies.

               F.   Applicants have thus determined  that it would be cost-
          effective and less burdensome administratively for the L/Cs to be
          furnished by  GPU. Accordingly, GPU  proposes to  enter into  L/C
          reimbursement  agreements and  to deliver  the related  L/Cs from
          time to time through December 31, 2006 to the insurance companies
          providing   workers  compensation   insurance  coverage   to  the
          Operating  Companies and  Service  Companies.   The maximum  face
          amount of the L/Cs which would be outstanding with respect to all
          Pennsylvania  employees of  the Operating  Companies  and Service
          Companies would not  exceed $20 million.   Similarly, the maximum
          face amount of the  L/Cs which would be outstanding  with respect
          to all  New  Jersey  employees  of the  Operating  Companies  and
          Service  Companies would  not exceed  $20 million.   Accordingly,
          upon receipt of  the authorization herein requested, GPU would be
          authorized  to  enter into  L/C  reimbursement  agreements in  an
          aggregate face  amount of up to $40 million.  Each L/C would have
          a term not exceeding three years. Draws under the L/C  would bear
          interest  at not more than 5% above the issuing bank's prime rate
          as in effect from time to time.
           
               G.   GPU  would  allocate  the  fees  for  each  L/C to  the
          Operating Companies and Service Companies on whose behalf the L/C
          was  issued  based  on  loss exposure  (determined  generally  by
          payroll) in  the applicable  state. GPU would  seek reimbursement
          for  a  draw on  an L/C  from  the Operating  Company  or Service
          Company  which  failed to  pay  the  applicable deductible  which
          resulted in such draw.  Upon receipt of the authorization  herein
          requested,   the  Operating  Companies   would  relinquish  their
          authority to enter into  L/C reimbursement agreements pursuant to
          the 1993 and 1994 Orders, provided that such relinquishment would
          not affect  any currently outstanding L/C's  delivered under such
          orders.

               H.   The Applicants submit that all of the criteria of Rules
          53 and 54 under the Act with respect to the proposed transactions
          are satisfied:

                         (i)  The  average  consolidated retained  earnings
                    for GPU and its subsidiaries, as reported for  the four
                    most recent quarterly periods in GPU's Annual Report on
                    Form  10-K for  the year  ended December  31,  1995 and
                    Quarterly Reports  on Form 10-Q for  the quarters ended
                    March 31, 1996, June 30,  1996 and September 30,  1996,
                    as filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, was
                    approximately $2.07 billion. As of September  30, 1996,
                    GPU had  invested, or committed to  invest, directly or
                                          2
<PAGE>
                    indirectly,  an aggregate of approximately $244 million
                    in  exempt  wholesale   generators  ("EWGs")  and  $679
                    million  in foreign utility  companies ("FUCOs"). GPU's
                    aggregate  investment  in  EWGs  and  FUCOs,  including
                    amounts invested pursuant to all outstanding or pending
                    authorizations to  make investments  in EWGs or  FUCOs,
                    will  not   at  any  time  exceed   the  "safe  harbor"
                    limitation imposed by Rule  53 without prior Commission
                    authorization.(1)

                         (ii) GPU maintains  books and records  to identify
                    investments in, and earnings from, each EWG and FUCO in
                    which it directly or indirectly holds an interest.

                              (A) For  each United States EWG  in which GPU
          directly or indirectly holds an interest:

                                   (1)  the books and records for  such EWG
                         will  be  kept in  conformity  with  United States
                         generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP");

                                   (2)  the  financial  statements will  be
                         prepared in accordance with GAAP; and

                                   (3)  GPU   directly   or   through   its
                         subsidiaries undertakes to provide  the Commission
                         access  to such  books and  records  and financial
                         statements as the Commission may request.

                              (B)  For each FUCO or  foreign EWG which is a
          majority-owned subsidiary of GPU:

                                   (1)  the  books  and  records  for  such
                         subsidiary will be kept in accordance with GAAP;

                                   (2)  the  financial statements  for such
                         subsidiary  will  be prepared  in  accordance with
                         GAAP; and

                                   (3)  GPU   directly   or   through   its
                         subsidiaries undertakes to provide  the Commission
                         access to  such  books and  records and  financial
                         statements, or  copies thereof in English,  as the
                         Commission may request.

                         (C)  For  each FUCO  or foreign EWG  in which  GPU
          owns  50% or  less  of the  voting  securities, GPU  directly  or
          through  its subsidiaries  will  proceed in  good  faith, to  the
          extent reasonable under the circumstances, to cause

                                   (1)  such entity to  maintain books  and
                         records in accordance with GAAP;
           _________________________

          1    GPU has filed with the Commission a Post-Effective Amendment
          to its Application on  Form u-1 in docket No.  70-8593 requesting
          authorization  to  increase  this  limitation to  1005  of  GPU's
          "consolidated retained earnings."

                                          3
<PAGE>

                                   (2)  the  financial  statements of  such
                         entity to be prepared in accordance with GAAP; and

                                   (3)  access  by the  Commission  to such
                         books  and records  and  financial statements  (or
                         copies thereof) in English  as the Commission  may
                         request  and,  in  any  event,  will  provide  the
                         Commission on request copies  of such materials as
                         are made available to GPU and its subsidiaries. If
                         and  to  the  extent  that  such  entity's  books,
                         records or financial statements are not maintained
                         in accordance with GAAP, GPU will, upon request of
                         the   Commission,   describe  and   quantify  each
                         material variation therefrom as and to  the extent
                         required by  subparagraphs (a)  (2) (iii)  (A) and
                         (a) (2) (iii) (B) of Rule 53.

                         (iii)  No more  than 2%  of GPU's  domestic public
               utility  subsidiary  employees  will  render  any  services,
               directly  or indirectly,  to any  EWG or  FUCO in  which GPU
               directly or indirectly holds an interest.

                         (iv) Copies of this Application are being provided
               to  the  New  Jersey  Board  of  Public  Utilities  and  the
               Pennsylvania  Public Utility  Commission, the  only federal,
               state or local regulatory agencies  having jurisdiction over
               the retail  rates of GPU's electric utility subsidiaries.(2)
               In addition, GPU will submit to each such commission  copies
               of any Rule 24 certificates required hereunder, as well as a
               copy  of  Item 9  of GPU's  Form U5S  and  Exhibits H  and I
               thereof  (commencing with the Form  U5S to be  filed for the
               calendar year in which the authorization herein requested is
               granted).

                         (v)  None  of the provisions  of paragraph  (b) of
               Rule 53 render  paragraph (a)  of that Rule  unavailable for
               the proposed transactions.

                              (A)  Neither GPU nor any subsidiary of GPU is
          the subject of any pending bankruptcy or similar proceeding.

                              (B)  GPU's   average  consolidated   retained
          earnings   for   the   four   most   recent   quarterly   periods
          (approximately   $2.07  billion)   represented  an   increase  of
          approximately $200 million (or  approximately 10%) in the average
          consolidated  retained earnings  for the previous  four quarterly
          periods (approximately $1.87 billion).

          _____________________

          2    Penelec is also subject to retail rate regulation by the New
          York Public Service  Commission with respect to retail service to
          approximately  11,300 customers  in Waverly,  New York  served by
          Waverly  Electric Power  & Light  Company, a  Penelec subsidiary.
          Waverly Electric's revenues are  immaterial, accounting for  less
          than 1% of Penelec's total operating revenues.

                                          4
<PAGE>


                              (C)  GPU  did not incur operating losses from
          direct  or  indirect investments  in EWGs  and  FUCOs in  1995 in
          excess of 5% of GPU's consolidated retained earnings.

                         (iv) In accordance with  Rule 54, the requirements
               of Rule 53(a), (b) and (c) are fulfilled.

          2.   By filing a  new proposed form of public notice in Exhibit G
               of Item 6 thereof as follows:

                    (a)  Exhibits:

                         G         Proposed form of public notice.











































                                          5
<PAGE>





                                      SIGNATURE



                    PURSUANT  TO  THE REQUIREMENTS  OF  THE  PUBLIC UTILITY

          HOLDING COMPANY ACT  OF 1935, THE UNDERSIGNED COMPANIES HAVE DULY

          CAUSED  THIS  STATEMENT  TO BE  SIGNED  ON  THEIR  BEHALF BY  THE

          UNDERSIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.


                                   GPU, INC.
                                   JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
                                   METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
                                   PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY



                                   By:                                     
                                        T. G. Howson
                                        Vice President and Treasurer




          Date: January 14, 1997<PAGE>







                             EXHIBIT TO BE FILED BY EDGAR



                    (a)  Exhibits:

                         G         Proposed form of public notice.
<PAGE>







                                                                  EXHIBIT G



          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
          (Release no. 35-_________; 70-8967)



               GPU,  INC. ("GPU"),  a  registered holding  company, at  100
          Interpace  Parkway, Parsippany,  New  Jersey   07054, and  JERSEY
          CENTRAL  POWER  & LIGHT  COMPANY  ("JCP&L"),  METROPOLITAN EDISON
          COMPANY  ("Met-Ed") and PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY ("Penelec")
          (JCP&L,  Met-Ed   and  Penelec,  collectively,   the  "'Operating
          Companies"), each of 2800  Pottsville Pike, Reading, Pennsylvania
          19605  and  electric utility  subsidiaries  of GPU  have  filed a
          Declaration  pursuant to  Section 6(a),  7 and  12 of  the Public
          Utility  Holding Company Act of 1935 (the "Act") and Rules 45, 53
          and 54 thereunder.

               The Operating  Companies  maintain insurance  policies  that
          provide coverage for workers  compensation claims, as required by
          state  law.    The  policies  also  provide  liability  insurance
          coverage for employee claims  made directly against the Operating
          Companies.  Prior to  1993, in the cases  of Met-Ed and  Penelec,
          and  1994,  in  the case  of  JCP&L,  the  policies required  the
          insurance company to pay  all claims without a deductible  and to
          pay  all expenses  and costs, including  legal fees,  incurred in
          connection  with  the  investigation, defense  or  settlement  of
          claims.

               In order  to reduce premium  costs, commencing  in 1993  for
          Met-Ed and Penelec and in 1994 for JCP&L, the Operating Companies
          modified  the policies to provide for the payment of a deductible
          for each claim, up to  a specified maximum amount for  all claims
          in the calendar year, and to pay the expenses attributable to all
          claims.  While the insurance company continues to administer  and
          pay  all  claims  and  expenses  as  they  arise,  the  Operating
          Companies reimburse the insurance company  for the amount of each
          claim paid  up to the  deductible and all  expenses paid in  such
          month.

               The insurance companies required, as a condition to permitting
          the policies to be modified to provide for the payment of the  
          deductible, that the Operating Companies deliver an irrevocable
          bank letter of credit ("L/C") as security for the Operating
          Companies obligations to pay the deductible. Accordingly, by Order
          dated April 14, 1993 (HCAR No. 35-25793) ("1993 Order"), Met-Ed and
          Penelec were authorized, among other things, to enter into L/C
          reimbursement agreements with banks and to deliver to their
          insurance company irrevocable bank L/Cs from time to time through
          December 31, 1998.  The aggregate face amount of the L/Cs delivered
          by Met-Ed and Penelec would not exceed $20 million, provided that
          the L/Cs delivered on behalf of Met-Ed or Penelec individually 
          would not exceed $15 million.  In addition, by Order dated March
          15, 1994 (HCAR No.  35-26003) ("1994 Order"), JCP&L was authorized,

<PAGE>
          among other  things, to  enter into L/C  reimbursement agreements
          with banks  and to deliver  to its insurance  company irrevocable
          bank L/Cs in an aggregate  face amount of up to $15  million from
          time to time through December 31, 1998.

               The Operating Companies now anticipate that it might be more
          efficient to have  their insurance policies cover, in addition to
          their employees, the Pennsylvania and New Jersey employees of GPU
          Service, Inc., GPU Nuclear, Inc., and GPU Generation, Inc., which
          are subsidiary  service companies  of GPU  ("Service Companies").
          Accordingly,  it will  now be  necessary to  furnish L/Cs  to the
          insurance companies  to support the obligations  of the Operating
          Companies and of the Service Companies to pay the deductible with
          respect to claims.

               Applicants  have  thus determined  that  it  would be  cost-
          effective and less burdensome administratively for the L/Cs to be
          furnished  by GPU. Accordingly,  GPU proposes  to enter  into L/C
          reimbursement  agreements and  to deliver  the related  L/Cs from
          time to time through December 31, 2006 to the insurance companies
          providing   workers  compensation   insurance  coverage   to  the
          Operating  Companies and  Service  Companies.   The maximum  face
          amount of the L/Cs which would be outstanding with respect to all
          Pennsylvania employees would not  exceed $20 million.  Similarly,
          the  maximum face amount of  the L/Cs which  would be outstanding
          with respect to  all New  Jersey employees would  not exceed  $20
          million.   Accordingly, upon receipt of  the authorization herein
          requested,   GPU  would   be   authorized  to   enter  into   L/C
          reimbursement agreements in an aggregate face amount of up to $40
          million.  Each L/C would have  a term not exceeding three  years.
          Draws upon the L/C would bear interest at not more  than 5% above
          the issuing bank's prime rate as in effect from time to time. 

               GPU  would allocate the fees  for each L/C  to the Operating
          Companies  and Service  Companies  on whose  behalf  the L/C  was
          issued based  on loss exposure (determined  generally by payroll)
          in  the applicable state. GPU would seek reimbursement for a draw
          on an L/C  from the  Operating Company or  Service Company  which
          failed to  pay the applicable  deductible which resulted  in such
          draw.  Upon receipt  of the  authorization herein  requested, the
          Operating  Companies would  relinquish their  authority  to enter
          into L/C reimbursement  agreements pursuant to the 1993  and 1994
          Orders, provided  that such  relinquishment would not  affect any
          currently outstanding L/C's delivered under such orders.

               The Applicants submit that  all or the criteria of  Rules 53
          and  54 under the Act  with respect to  the proposed transactions
          are satisfied.

               The Declaration and any amendments thereto are available for
          public  inspection  through  the  Commission s  Office  of Public
          Reference.  Interested  persons wishing to  comment or request  a
          hearing should submit  their views in writing  by ________, 1997,
          to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington,
          DC 20549, and serve a copy on the applicants at the address above.

                                          2<PAGE>



          Proof of service (by affidavit, or in case of an attorney at law,
          by certificate) should be  filed with the  request.  Any
          request for a  hearing shall identify specifically  the issues of
          fact or law that are disputed.   A person who so requests will be
          notified of any hearing, if  ordered, and will receive a copy  of
          any notice  or order issued in this matter.  After said date, the
          Declaration, as it  may be  amended, may be  permitted to  become
          effective.



                                                  Jonathan G. Katz
                                                  Secretary











































                                          3<PAGE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission