GPU INC /PA/
35-CERT, 1998-03-03
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORP, 424B3, 1998-03-03
Next: GTE CORP, DEF 14A, 1998-03-03



                                                          SEC FILE NO. 70-8877



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549







                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

                                     RULE 24

                          OF COMPLETION OF TRANSACTIONS









                                    GPU, INC.


<PAGE>




SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

- --------------------------------------:
In the Matter of                      :
                                      :
GPU, Inc.                             :     Certificate Pursuant to
File No. 70-8877                      :     Rule 24 of Completion of
                                      :     Transactions
(Public Utility Holding               :
Company Act of 1935)                  :
- --------------------------------------


To the Members of the Securities and Exchange Commission:

                  The undersigned,  GPU, Inc. ("GPU"), hereby certifies pursuant
to Rule 24 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Public Utility Holding
Company  Act  of  1935  (the  "Act"),  that  the  transactions  proposed  in the
Application, as amended, docketed in SEC File No. 70-8877, have been carried out
in accordance  with the terms and conditions of, and for the purposes  requested
in, said Application and pursuant to the Commission's  Order,  dated October 10,
1996 (HCAR No. 26591), with respect thereto, as follows:

                  1. On February  12,  1998,  GPU entered  into an  Underwriting
Agreement (the  "Underwriting  Agreement") with Goldman,  Sachs & Co., Merrill &
Lynch Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan Stanley
& Co. Incorporated,  as representatives of the several  underwriters,  including
such firms named in Schedule A thereto (the  "Underwriters"),  providing for the
issuance  and sale by GPU of  6,100,000  shares of GPU Common  Stock,  $2.50 par
value per share  (the  "Additional  Common  Stock"),  to the  Underwriters.  The
Underwriting  Agreement  provided  for the purchase by the  Underwriters  of the
Additional  Common  Stock at a price of $39.5625  per share (or an  aggregate of
$241,331,250) less an underwriting  discount of $1.07 per share (or an aggregate
of  $6,527,000).  Such  underwriting  discount  represents 2.7% of the price per
share.

                  2. Under the Underwriting Agreement, the Underwriters received
an option (the "Overallotment Option"), exercisable for 30 days from the date of
the Underwriting  Agreement,  to purchase up to an additional  900,000 shares of
GPU  Common  Stock to cover  over-allotment,  if any.  The  purchase  price  and
underwriting  discounts for the Overallotment  Option shares were to be the same
as for the Additional Common Stock.

                  3. On  February  17,  1998,  the  Underwriters  exercised  the
Overallotment Option.  Accordingly, on February 19, 1998, GPU issued and sold to
the  Underwriters a total of 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock for a net purchase
price of  $269,447,500.  GPU will  apply  approximately  $244.7  million  of net


<PAGE>


proceeds to pay interest and prepay  outstanding  indebtedness  incurred for the
Midlands Electricity plc and PowerNet Victoria acquisitions. The balance will be
used to repay  approximately  $5.3  million  of  outstanding  GPU  International
indebtedness and $19.4 million for other corporate purposes.

                  4. The following exhibits in Item 6 are filed herewith:

B-1(b)   -   Underwriting   Agreement   dated   February   12,  1998  -
             Incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 1 to GPU Form 8-K, dated
             February 17, 1998 (File No. 1-6047).

F-1(a)   -   "Past tense" opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP.

F-2(a)   -   "Past tense" opinion of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP.




<PAGE>



                                    SIGNATURE

                  PURSUANT TO THE  REQUIREMENTS  OF THE PUBLIC  UTILITY  HOLDING
COMPANY ACT OF 1935, THE  UNDERSIGNED  COMPANY HAS DULY CAUSED THIS STATEMENT TO
BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

                                    GPU, INC.




                                    By:___________________________
                                        T.G. Howson
                                        Vice President and Treasurer


Date:  March 3, 1998






                          EXHIBITS TO BE FILED BY EDGAR
                          -----------------------------



Exhibits:

F-1(a) - "Past tense" opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP.

F-2(a) - "Past tense" opinion of Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP.






                                                                 Exhibit F-1(a)






                                               March 3, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

                  Re:      GPU, Inc.
                           Application on Form U-1
                           SEC File No. 70-8877
                           --------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  We refer to our  opinion,  dated  October  7,  1996,  filed as
Exhibit F-1 to Amendment No. 1, dated the same date, to the  Application on Form
U-1, dated June 24, 1996,  under the Public Utility  Holding Company Act of 1935
(the "Act"),  filed by GPU, Inc., a Pennsylvania  corporation  (the  "Company"),
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the  "Commission") and docketed in
SEC File No. 70-8877. (The Application, as thus amended, is hereinafter referred
to as the "Application").

                  The Application contemplated, among other things, the issuance
and sale by the  Company  of up to  7,000,000  additional  shares of its  common
stock,  par value $2.50 per share (the "Additional  Common Stock").  The Company
would  issue and sell the  Additional  Common  Stock  from  time to time  either
through (i) one or more negotiated  transactions with one or more  underwriters,
(ii) one or more selling or placement agents who regularly engage in the sale or
placement  of such  securities  pursuant  to a selling  agency  or  distribution
agreement,  or (iii) direct  placement  transactions,  sales to institutional or
other purchasers through privately negotiated  transactions,  or any combination
of the foregoing.  In addition,  it was also contemplated that the Company might
sell Additional  Common Stock through a selling agent, as principal,  for resale
to the public either directly or through  dealers.  It was anticipated that such
sales would be made from time to time (x) in one or more market  transactions on
the floor of the New York Stock  Exchange or any regional  exchange on which the
Company's  common  stock  may  be  admitted  to  trading  privileges,  in  block
transactions  on such  exchanges,  fixed price  offerings  off the floor of such
exchanges or other special type  offerings or  distributions  made in accordance
with the rules of such exchanges and/or (y) in private placement transactions.

                  For many years, we have  participated  in various  proceedings
related  to the  issuance  and  sale of  securities  by the  Company  and we are



<PAGE>


familiar  with  the  terms of the  outstanding  securities  of the  corporations
comprising the GPU holding company system.

                  In  addition  to the  examination  recited  in  the  aforesaid
opinion,  we have  examined  a signed  copy of your  Commission's  Order,  dated
October 10, 1996,  forthwith  permitting the  Application,  as then amended,  to
become  effective.  We attended the closing of the transactions  contemplated by
the Application and examined the various instruments,  documents, agreements and
certificates executed and delivered at the closing. We have also examined a copy
of the Company's  Certificate Pursuant to Rule 24 of Completion of Transactions,
dated this date,  under the Act,  with which  Certificate  this opinion is being
filed,  certifying  to  the  completion  of  the  transactions  proposed  in the
Application.

                  With  respect to all  matters  of  Pennsylvania  law,  we have
relied upon the opinion of Ballard  Spahr  Andrews &  Ingersoll,  LLP,  which is
being filed as Exhibit F-2(a) to the aforesaid Rule 24 Certificate.

                  Based upon the  foregoing,  and assuming that all action under
state "Blue Sky" laws to permit the consummation of the subject transactions has
been completed, we are of the opinion that:

         (a) all State laws applicable to the proposed transactions have 
been complied with;

         (b) the  Additional  Common Stock has been validly  issued and is fully
paid and non-assessable,  and the holders thereof are entitled to the rights and
privileges   appertaining  thereto  set  forth  in  the  Company's  Articles  of
Incorporation; and

         (c) the  consummation of the proposed  transactions did not violate the
legal  rights of the  holders  of any  securities  issued by the  Company or any
"associate company" thereof, as defined in the Act.

                  We hereby  consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the Rule 24 Certificate and in any proceedings before the Commission that may
be held in connection therewith.

                                               Very truly yours,




                                               BERLACK, ISRAELS & LIBERMAN LLP




             (LETTERHEAD OF BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP)


                                                                 Exhibit F-2(a)








                                               March 3, 1998


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

                  Re:  GPU, Inc.
                       Application on Form U-1
                       SEC File No. 70-8877
                       --------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:


                  We refer to our  opinion,  dated  October  7,  1996,  filed
as Exhibit  F-2 to Amendment No. 1, dated the same date, to the Application on 
Form U-1, dated June 24,  1996,  under the Public  Utility  Holding  Company
Act of 1935 (the "Act"), filed by GPU, Inc., a Pennsylvania  corporation 
("GPU"), with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Commission") and 
docketed by the Commission in SEC File No. 70-8877. (The Application, as so 
amended, is hereinafter referred to as the "Application").

                  The Application contemplated, among other things, the issuance
and sale by GPU of up to 7,000,000  additional  shares of its common stock,  par
value $2.50 per share (the "Additional Common Stock"), either through (i) one or
more negotiated  transactions  with one or more  underwriters,  (ii) one or more
selling or  placement  agents who  regularly  engage in the sale or placement of
such securities  pursuant to a selling agency or distribution  agreement,  (iii)
direct  placement  transactions or sales to  institutional  or other  purchasers
through  privately  negotiated  transactions,  or (iv)  any  combination  of the
foregoing.  In addition, it was also contemplated that GPU might sell Additional
Common Stock to a selling agent,  as principal,  for resale to the public either
directly or through  dealers.  It was anticipated  that such sales would be made
from time to time (x) in one or more market transactions on the floor of the New
York Stock Exchange or any regional  exchange on which GPU's common stock may be
admitted to trading  privileges,  in block  transactions on such  exchanges,  in
fixed price offerings off the floor of such exchanges or other such special type


<PAGE>


offerings or  distributions  made in accordance with the rules of such exchanges
and/or (y) in private placement transactions.

                  We have been  Pennsylvania  counsel to GPU and  certain of its
subsidiaries  for many  years.  In addition  to the  examination  recited in the
aforesaid  opinion,  we have examined a signed copy of the  Commission's  Order,
dated October 10, 1996, forthwith  permitting the Application,  as then amended,
to become effective. We examined the various instruments,  documents, agreements
and  certificates  executed and  delivered  at the closing for the  transactions
contemplated  by  the  Application.  We  have  also  examined  a copy  of  GPU's
Certificate Pursuant to Rule 24 of Completion of Transactions,  dated this date,
under the Act, with which Certificate this opinion is being filed, certifying to
the completion of the transactions proposed in the Application.

                  Based upon the foregoing,  we are of the opinion that, insofar
as matters of Pennsylvania law are concerned:

         (a)      all Pennsylvania laws applicable to the proposed transactions
                  have been complied with;

         (b)      the Additional  Common Stock has been validly issued, is fully
                  paid and non-assessable,  and the holders thereof are entitled
                  to the rights and privileges appertaining thereto set forth in
                  GPU's Articles of Incorporation; and

         (c)      the issuance and sale of the  Additional  Common Stock did not
                  violate  the legal  rights of the  holders  of any  securities
                  issued  by  GPU,   Pennsylvania   Electric   Company   or  its
                  subsidiaries Ninevah Water Company, Penelec Preferred Capital,
                  Inc. and Penelec Capital, L.P.

                  We hereby  consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to  the  aforesaid  Rule  24  Certificate  and  in any  proceedings  before  the
Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                                         Very truly yours,




                                         Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission