NEUBERGER & BERMAN EQUITY FUNDS
497, 1996-04-04
Previous: GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORP, 424B3, 1996-04-04
Next: NEUBERGER & BERMAN EQUITY FUNDS, 497, 1996-04-04


<PAGE>
                           Neuberger & Berman Equity Funds

                Supplement to the Statement of Additional Information
                               Dated December 15, 1995

                     Neuberger & Berman Socially Responsive Fund

              Effective April 8, 1996, the following supplements information
     about the above-mentioned series appearing in the Statement of Additional
     Information of Neuberger & Berman Equity Funds.  Except as otherwise
     provided herein, all capitalized terms have the meanings set forth in the
     Statement of Additional Information.

                                INVESTMENT INFORMATION

              Janet W. Prindle, Portfolio Manager of Neuberger & Berman
                        Socially Responsive Portfolio (p. 14)

     An Interview with Janet Prindle
     -------------------------------

     Q:       FIRST THINGS FIRST.  HOW DO YOU BEGIN YOUR STOCK SELECTION
     PROCESS?

     A:       Our first question is always:  On financial grounds alone, is a
     company a smart investment?  For a company's stock to meet our financial
     test, it must pass a number of hurdles.

              We look for bargains, just like the portfolio managers of other
     Neuberger & Berman Equity Funds.  More specifically, we search for
     companies that we believe have terrific products, excellent customer
     service, and solid balance sheets -- but because they may have missed
     quarterly earnings expectations by a few pennies, because their sectors
     are currently out of favor, because Wall Street overreacted to a temporary
     setback, or because the company's merits aren't widely known, their stocks
     are selling at a discount.

              While we look at the stock's fundamentals carefully, that's not
     all we examine.  We meet an awful lot of CEOs and CFOs.  Top officers of
     over 400 companies visit Neuberger & Berman each year, and I'm also
     frequently on the road visiting dozens of corporations.  From Neuberger &
     Berman Socially Responsive Fund's inception, we've met with every company
     we own.

              When I'm face to face with a CEO, I'm searching for answers to
     two crucial questions:  "Does the company have a vision of where it wants
     to go?" and "Can the management team make it happen?"  I've analyzed
     companies for over three decades, and I always look for companies that
     have both clear strategies and management talent.

     Q:       WHEN YOU EVALUATE A COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET, WHAT MATTERS THE
     MOST TO YOU?
<PAGE>






     A:       Definitely a company's "free cash flow."  Compare it to your
     household's discretionary income -- the money you have left over each
     month after you pay off your monthly debt and other expenses.  With ample
     free cash flow, a company can do any number of things.  It can buy back
     its stock.  Make important acquisitions.  Expand its research &
     development spending.  Or increase its dividend payments.

              When a company generates lots of excess cash flow, it has growth
     capital at its disposal.  It can invest for higher profits down the line
     and improve shareholder value.  Determining exactly how a company intends
     to spend its excess cash is an entirely different matter -- and that's
     where the information learned in our company meetings come in.  Still,
     you've got to have the extra cash in the first place.  Which is why we pay
     so much attention to it.

     Q:       SO YOU TAKE A HARD LOOK AT A COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AND ITS
     MANAGEMENT.  AFTER A COMPANY PASSES YOUR FINANCIAL TEST, WHAT DO YOU DO
     NEXT?

     A:       After we're convinced of a company's merits on financial grounds
     alone, we review its record as a corporate citizen.  In particular, we
     look for evidence of leadership in three key areas:  concern for the
     environment, workplace diversity, and enlightened employment practices.

              It should be clear that our social screening always takes place
     after we search far and wide for what we believe are the best investment
     opportunities available.  This is a crucial point, and I'll use an analogy
     to explain it.  Let's assume you're looking to fill a vital position in
     your company.  What you'd pay attention to first is the candidate's
     competence:  Can he or she do the job?  So after interviewing a number of
     candidates, you'd narrow your list to those that are highly qualified.  To
     choose from this smaller group, you might look at the candidate's
     personality:  Can he or she get along with everyone in your group?

              Obviously, you wouldn't hire an unqualified person simply because
     he or she is likable.  What you'd probably do is give the job to a highly
     qualified person who is also compatible with your group.

              Now, let's turn to the companies that do make our financial cuts. 
     How do we decide whether they meet our social criteria?  Once again, our
     regular meetings with CEOs are key.  We look for top management's support
     of programs that put more women and minorities in the pipeline to be
     future officers and board members; that minimize emissions, reduce waste,
     conserve energy, and protect natural resources; and that enable employees
     to balance work and family life with benefits such as flextime and
     generous maternal and paternal leave.

              We realize that companies are not all good or all bad.  Instead
     of looking for ethical perfection, we analyze how a company responds to
     troublesome problems.  If a company is cited for breaking a pollution law,
     we evaluate its reaction.  We also ask:  is it the first time?  Do its top
     executives have a plan for making sure it doesn't happen again -- and how
     committed are they?
<PAGE>






              If we're satisfied with the answers, a company makes it into our
     portfolio.  When all is said and done, we invest in companies that have
     diverse work forces, strong CEOs, tough environmental standards, and
     terrific balance sheets.  In our judgment, financially strong companies
     that are also good corporate citizens are more likely to enjoy a
     competitive advantage.  These days, more and more people won't buy a
     product unless they know it's environmentally friendly.  In a similar
     vein, companies that treat their workers well may be more productive and
     profitable.

     Q:       WHY HAVE INVESTORS BEEN ATTRACTED TO NEUBERGER & BERMAN SOCIALLY
     RESPONSIVE FUND?

     A:       Our shareholders are looking to invest for the future in more
     ways than one.  While they care deeply about their own financial futures,
     they're equally passionate about the world they leave to later
     generations.  They want to be able to meet their college bills and leave a
     world where the air is a little cleaner and where the doors to the
     executive suite are a little more open.
<PAGE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission