HILTON HOTELS CORP
DFAN14A, 1997-11-07
HOTELS & MOTELS
Previous: HILTON HOTELS CORP, SC 14D1/A, 1997-11-07
Next: DOVER INVESTMENTS CORP, SC 13D/A, 1997-11-07






                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant [_]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]

Check the appropriate box:

  [_]Preliminary Proxy Statement          [_]Confidential,for Use of the
  [_]Definitive Proxy Statement              Commission Only (as permitted
  [X]Definitive Additional Materials         by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
  [_]Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11 or Section 240.14a-12

                                ITT CORPORATION
                (NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

                           HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION

                                HLT CORPORATION
                   (NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

  [X] No fee required.

  [_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

      (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

      (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

      (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
          pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
          the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

      (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

      (5) Total fee paid:

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  [_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

  [_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
      Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
      paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
      number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

      (1) Amount Previously Paid:

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

      (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

      (3) Filing Party:

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------

      (4) Date Filed:

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------<PAGE>
        TO ALL ITT CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS:

                            TRUSTING ITT IS A GAMBLE

        THERE THEY GO AGAIN.  After nine months of doing everything
        possible to avoid even speaking with Hilton, ITT's directors are
        now asking you to re-elect them so that they can "auction" the
        company.

                                DON'T BELIEVE THEM

        REMEMBER:  In Spring of 1997, ITT delayed its annual meeting,
        arguing to a federal court that the delay was necessary to enable
        shareholders to make a "better informed" decision.

        BUT in July 1997, ITT sought to circumvent its shareholders
        altogether, by cramming down its "comprehensive plan" before the
        shareholders could have a chance to vote.

         - Only Hilton's efforts in court stopped them.

                                 DON'T TRUST THEM

         - Here's what the United States District Court concluded about
           ITT's attempts to evade Hilton and the ITT shareholders by
           implementing the comprehensive plan without shareholder
           approval:  "It has as its primary purpose the entrenchment of
           the incumbent ITT Board."1

         - ITT concocted its risky, disguised recap transaction with
           Starwood, including over $250 million of "break up fees,"
           without even speaking with Hilton.

                               DON'T RE-ELECT THEM

         - ITT described its efforts to evade Hilton as a "war" and told
           the press "we have no intention of losing this war."2

         - In fact Rand Araskog even wrote, in his book The ITT Wars,
           "[I]n the fight for survival, we flirted a bit ourselves,
           buying that most precious of commodities, time."3

         - Here's what ITT had to say just a few weeks ago about
           negotiating with Hilton:  "It'll be a cold day in hell"
           before ITT Chairman Rand Araskog would meet with Hilton's
           President and CEO Steve Bollenbach.4

                     THERE IS NO AUCTION AFTER NOVEMBER 12TH

         IF HILTON'S NOMINEES ARE NOT ELECTED, HILTON'S $80 OFFER IS
         GONE.

                         VOTE THE WHITE PROXY CARD TODAY

               Elect Hilton's Nominees On November 12th For A Board
                      That Is Truly Committed To Selling ITT

                                    IMPORTANT

         DO NOT DELAY!  Vote the WHITE proxy card as soon as you receive
         it.  REMEMBER--Tuesday the 11th of November is a U.S. post
         office holiday with no regularly scheduled mail deliveries.  To
         be sure your proxy is received in time please use Express Mail,
         FedEx, or UPS next day mail.  If you have any questions or need
         assistance in completing the WHITE proxy card, please contact:

         [LOGO OF           156 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York  10010
         MACKENZIE           (212) 929-5500 (call collect)
         PARTNERS, INC.]                    or
                                  CALL TOLL-FREE (800) 322-2885

                                 [LOGO OF
                                  HILTON
                             HOTELS CORPORATION]


         1Hilton Hotels Corporation and HLT Corporation vs. ITT
         Corporation, United States District Court, District of Nevada
         LEXIS 15707, p.28 (October 2, 1997, PMP).

         2Charles Pretzlik, "ITT chief's 'parachute' in bid war," The
         Daily Telegraph, London. October 16, 1997.

         3Rand Araskog, The ITT Wars. Henry Holt and Company: New York,
         1989. p.10

         4Gary Thompson, "ITT scrambles in wake of ruling," Las Vegas
         Sun. October 1, 1997.

         Permission to use these quotations was neither sought nor
         obtained.


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission