<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
/X/ Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended
August 31, 1996
or
/ / Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
------------------------
Commission File
Nos. 33-83868 and 333-11693
------------------------
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MINNESOTA 84-0004720
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification
Number)
101 NORTH THIRD STREET
MOORHEAD, MN 56560 (218) 236-4400
(Address of principal executive (Registrant's telephone number)
offices)
</TABLE>
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
NONE
------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES /X/ NO / /
------------------------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. / /
------------------------
As of November 22, 1996, 2,441 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock and
415,255 shares of the Registrant's Preferred Stock were outstanding. As there is
only a limited, private market for shares of the Registrant's stock and the
Registrant does not obtain information regarding the transfer price in
transactions between its members, the Registrant is not able to estimate the
aggregate market value of the Registrant's shares held by non-affiliates.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain exhibits to this Report are incorporated by reference from the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File number 33-83868), declared
effective on November 23, 1994, from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1995 and from the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File number 333-11693), declared effective on November
13, 1996.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
American Crystal Sugar Company ("American Crystal" or the "Company") is a
Minnesota agricultural cooperative corporation owned by approximately 2,443
sugarbeet growers in the Minnesota and North Dakota portions of the Red River
Valley. (The Red River Valley, the largest sugarbeet growing area in the United
States, forms a band approximately 35 miles on either side of the North Dakota
and Minnesota border and extends approximately 200 miles south from the border
of the United States and Canada.) The Company currently processes sugarbeets
from a base level of approximately 415,000 acres, subject to tolerances for
overplanting and underplanting established by the Board of Directors each year.
By owning and operating five sugarbeet processing facilities in the Red River
Valley, the Company provides its shareholders with the ability to process their
sugarbeets into sugar and by-products, such as molasses and beet pulp. The sugar
is pooled and then marketed through the services of a marketing agent under
contract with the Company. The sugar marketing agent, United Sugars Corporation,
is a cooperative owned by its members, American Crystal, Southern Minnesota Beet
Sugar Cooperative and Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative. The Company's molasses, beet
pulp and Concentrated Separated By-Product (CSB) (a by-product of the molasses
desugarization process) are also marketed through a marketing agent, Midwest
Agri-Commodities Company. Midwest Agri-Commodities Company is a cooperative
whose members are the Company, Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative and Southern
Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative. The Company is also one of three members of
ProGold Limited Liability Company, a joint venture the purpose of which is to
construct and operate a corn wet milling plant in Wahpeton, North Dakota.
American Crystal was organized in 1973 by sugarbeet growers to acquire the
business and assets of American Crystal Sugar Company, then a publicly held New
Jersey corporation in operation since 1899.
American Crystal's corporate headquarters are located at 101 North Third
Street, Moorhead, Minnesota 56560 (telephone number (218) 236-4400). Its fiscal
year ends August 31.
PRODUCTS AND PRODUCTION
American Crystal is engaged primarily in the production and marketing of
sugar from sugarbeets. American Crystal also markets beet pulp, molasses and
CSB, which are by-products of the sugar it produces, and sugarbeet seed.
American Crystal processes sugarbeets grown by its members in five factories
located in the Red River Valley area of Minnesota and North Dakota. The growing
area is divided into five factory districts, each containing one sugar
processing plant.
The period during which the Company's plants are in operation to process
sugarbeets into sugar and by-products is referred to as the "campaign." During
the campaign, each of the Company's factories is operated twenty-four hours per
day, seven days per week. The campaign is expected to begin in September, when a
small portion of the sugarbeet crop is harvested, and continues until the
available supply of beets has been depleted, which generally occurs in March or
April of the following year. Based on current processing capacity, an average
campaign lasts approximately 226 days, assuming normal crop yields.
Once the sugarbeets are harvested, rapid processing is important to maximize
sugar extraction and minimize spoilage. Members transport their crop by truck to
receiving stations designated by the Company and receive a hauling allowance
under the Grower's Contract. Beets are then stored in factory yards and at
outlying piling stations until processing.
American Crystal's total sugar production is presently influenced by the
amount and quality of sugarbeets grown by its members, the processing capacity
of the Company's plants and by the ability to store harvested beets. Most of the
beet harvest is stored in piles. Although frozen sugarbeets may be stored
2
<PAGE>
for extended periods, beets stored in unprotected piles at temperatures above
freezing must be processed within approximately 150 days. In most years,
therefore, the cold weather in North Dakota and Minnesota offers an advantage to
the Company as it permits the outdoor storage of sugarbeets in below-freezing
weather conditions. By contrast, unprotected piles of sugarbeets would
experience cycles of freezing and thawing and, therefore, be subject to some
deterioration. Subject to such freeze and thaw cycles, beets on the exterior of
piles freeze naturally. Beets near the center of the piles, however, may not
freeze and thus may be more subject to spoilage. The Company utilizes a process
called "split pile storage" in which beets from the center of the piles are
removed for processing first. Split pile storage permits more of the stored
beets to freeze naturally.
American Crystal also utilizes a ventilation technique to further reduce
spoilage. In this process, fans circulate air through ventilation channels
constructed within beet piles in order to precool and then deep freeze the
beets. Approximately 11% of an average crop may be stored in ventilated storage
sites. Enclosed cold storage facilities are also used to extend the beet storage
period at each of the Company's factory locations. Cold storage sites presently
have the capacity to cover approximately 8% of an average crop.
Once the sugarbeets arrive in the factory, the basic steps in producing
sugar from them include: washing; slicing into thin strips called "cossettes";
extracting the sugar from the cossettes in a diffuser; purifying the resulting
"raw juice" and boiling it, first in an evaporator to thicken it and then in
vacuum pans to crystalize the sugar; separating the sugar crystals in a
centrifuge; drying the sugar; storing sugar in bulk form and grading and
screening the crystals for packaging and bulk shipping.
The Company's sugarbeet by-products include molasses and beet pulp. After
the extraction of raw juice from the cossettes, the remaining pulp is dried and
processed into animal feeds. The Company processes approximately one-half of its
molasses through its molasses desugarization facility to extract additional
sugar. The remaining molasses and CSB from the molasses desugarization process
are marketed through Midwest Agri-Commodities and are sold primarily to yeast
and pharmaceutical manufacturers and for use in animal feeds.
The Company also has its own Seed Division which has been in existence since
the 1920s. The goal of the Seed Division is to ensure that the Company's
shareholders have the highest quality sugarbeet hybrids available to maximize
their production. Since the mid-1970s, American Crystal has had an effective
working arrangement with Danisco Seed of Denmark. Exchange of germplasm between
American Crystal and Danisco provides a wide genetic base in developing hybrids
by both companies. The Seed Division markets its seed to sugarbeet growers in
Michigan, Ohio, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Nebraska, Idaho, Oregon and
Washington.
RECENT CROPS
The recently completed harvest of the sugarbeet crop grown during 1996
produced a total of approximately 18 tons of sugarbeets per acre from roughly
459,000 acres. That production exceeded 16.8 tons per acre, which is the
ten-year average of tons per acre for the years from 1986 through 1995. The
sugar content of the 1996 crop is 17.34%, in comparison to a ten year average
for the applicable period of 17.5%. The Company expects to produce a total of
roughly 21.9 million hundredweight of sugar from the 1996 sugarbeet crop.
American Crystal's members harvested approximately 8.0 million tons of
sugarbeets from 430,000 acres for the 1995 crop. The approximately 18.7 ton per
acre crop yield will be higher than the then-current 16.6 ton per acre 10 year
average. Sugar content for the 1995 crop was approximately 16.4%, which is 1.1%
lower than the then-current ten year average of 17.5%. Beet processing began on
September 7, 1995 and the Company produced 20.2 million hundredweights of sugar
during the 1995-1996 campaign.
For a discussion of the 1995, 1994 and 1993 crops and results of operations
for fiscal years 1996, 1995 and 1994, see "Management's Discussion of the
Results of Operations".
3
<PAGE>
MARKET AND COMPETITION
According to United States government estimates, the United States market
for sugar during the year beginning on October 1, 1995 and ending on September
30, 1996 totalled approximately 176 million hundredweights of sugar. That
estimate suggests the continuation of a trend of growth in the market in recent
years at a compounded rate of approximately 2% per year with estimates for 1996
and 1997 indicating a 1.3% increase in consumption. For example, from a market
of approximately 146 million hundredweights in 1986, the total domestic market
grew to a total of approximately 174 million hundredweights in 1995. Given the
size of the total market, the Company's sugar production and sales represented
slightly more than 11.1% of the total domestic market for refined sugar in 1994
and 1995.
The growth in the market for refined sugar in the late 1980s and the early
1990s is a reversal of trends in the 1970s and early 1980s which resulted in a
reduced market for refined sugar. During the 1970s and early 1980s, high
fructose corn syrup was increasingly used as a replacement for refined sugar in
certain food products. (The prime example of this trend was the use of high
fructose corn syrup in beverages such as soft drinks.) In addition,
non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame were developed and used in food
products. While high fructose corn syrup and non-nutritive sweeteners constitute
a large portion of the overall sweetener market, the Company believes that the
recent trend of increased use of refined sugar results from population growth
and, more importantly, increased acceptance of the use of sugar as a desirable
natural ingredient in a normal diet.
The trends described in the preceding paragraph are illustrated by the
following chart:
EDGAR REPRESENTATION OF DATA POINTS USED IN PRINTED GRAPHIC
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MILLION SHORT TONS RAW VALUE
<S> <C>
81/2 9.206
82/3 8.874
83/4 8.578
84/5 8.097
85/6 7.794
86/7 8.046
87/8 8.193
88/9 8.264
89/0 8.531
90/1 8.901
91/2 9.006
92/3 9.197
93/4 9.333
94/5 9.337
95/6 9.700
</TABLE>
The Company's main competitors in the domestic market are beet sugar
processors including Holly Sugar Corporation (a division of Imperial Holly
Corporation), Western Sugar Company (a subsidiary of Tate & Lyle, Inc.),
Amalgamated Sugar Company, Michigan Sugar Company (wholly-owned by Savannah
Foods and Industries, Inc.) and Monitor Sugar Company, Inc. The Company's
products also compete with
4
<PAGE>
cane sugar refined by Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., California and
Hawaiian Sugar Company, Imperial Holly Corporation and Domino Sugar (a
subsidiary of Tate & Lyle, Inc.) Because sugar is a fungible commodity,
competition for sales volume is based primarily upon price, customer service and
reliability. However, recent information suggests a decrease in sugar production
in the United States of approximately 5% in 1996 and 1997.
According to United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") statistics,
the Red River Valley is generally one of the most cost efficient sugarbeet
producing areas in the nation. As a result, the Company's management believes
that it possesses the ability to compete successfully with other producers of
sugar in the United States. In spite of this competitive advantage, substitute
products and sugar imports could have a material and adverse effect on the
Company's operations in the future.
GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS AND REGULATION
Domestic sugar prices are supported under a program administered by the
USDA. Under the current program, which was initiated in 1981 and extended under
the Food Security Act of 1985, the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act
of 1990 and the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (the
"FAIR Act"), the price of sugar is required to be maintained above the price at
which producers could forfeit sugar to repay nonrecourse loans obtained through
the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). The USDA maintains sugar prices without
cost to the U.S. Treasury by regulating the quantity of sugar imports. Under the
"Tariff Rate Quota" implemented October 1, 1990, sugar producing countries are
assigned a fixed quantity of imports duty-free or subject to minimal duties.
Unlimited additional quantities may be imported upon payment of a tariff of 16
cents per pound prior to shipment. (To date, only minute quantities of sugar
have been imported under this higher tariff level.)
The Uruguay Round agreement under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) mandates imports of at least 1,257,000 short tons of sugar per year into
the United States. The FAIR Act maintains the basic 18 cent per pound loan rate
for raw sugar and puts in place a 22.90 cent per pound loan rate for refined
beet sugar. Both loan rates are effective for crop years 1996 through 2002.
Price support loans are to be made on a non-recourse basis provided the US sugar
imports for domestic usage exceed 1.5 million short tons raw value in a given
fiscal (October through September) year. Loans made on a non-recourse basis
enable the sugar processor to forfeit sugar to the CCC if sugar prices are below
the loan rate. If imports during a given year are less than 1.5 million short
tons, loans must be made on a recourse basis, meaning that processors will not
be able to forfeit sugar to the CCC at its full loan value. In order to recover
the full value of a recourse loan, the CCC could require that cash or other
assets be provided in addition to the sugar used as collateral when the loan is
made. Another new provision of the FAIR Act is a one cent per pound penalty paid
by processors if the processor defaults on sugar price support loans.
The nature and scope of future legislation affecting the sugar market cannot
be predicted and there can be no assurance that price supports will continue in
their present form. As a result of uncertainty regarding the impact of the
absence of price supports, the Company is not able to predict if such changes in
legislation would have an adverse impact on the Company or the magnitude of such
impact.
MARKETING, CUSTOMERS AND PRICES
Since January, 1994, American Crystal's sugar has been marketed by United
Sugars Corporation, a cooperative common marketing agency. United Sugars
Corporation was formed in late 1993, at which time American Crystal contributed
approximately $6,880,000, in the form of certain assets, to the capital of
United Sugars Corporation. In exchange for that capital contribution, the
Company received an ownership interest of approximately 69%. (American Crystal's
representatives on the United Sugars Corporation Board of Directors total
one-third of the members of the United Sugars Board and, therefore, American
Crystal does not possess a controlling interest in the day-to-day affairs of
United Sugars Corporation, except to the extent that certain Board actions must
also be approved by the members of the association,
5
<PAGE>
for example mergers or consolidations, sales or liquidations of substantially
all of the association's assets, and dissolution of the association.) Upon
completion of the incorporation and capitalization of United Sugars Corporation,
American Crystal entered into a "Uniform Member Marketing Agreement" with United
Sugars. Under that agreement, the sugar produced by American Crystal is pooled
with sugar produced by Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative and Southern Minnesota Beet
Sugar Cooperative and is then sold through the efforts of United Sugars. The
Company receives payment for its sugar by receiving its pro rata share of the
net proceeds from the sale of the pooled sugar. The net proceeds of such sales
represent the gross proceeds of sale of the sugar, adjusted for the various
costs and expenses of marketing the pooled sugar, including the Company's pro
rata share of the marketing and sales expenses incurred by United Sugars
Corporation. Any net proceeds from the operation of United Sugars Corporation
are distributed to the various members on a patronage basis.
In 1993 and earlier years, American Crystal marketed most of its sugar
through direct sales efforts, supplemented by the efforts of sugar brokers
retained by the Company. Since 1994, the Company has marketed its sugar
exclusively through United Sugars Corporation. The Company's sugar is sold in
bulk, as liquid sugar and in cartons and bags ranging in size from 1 to 100
pounds.
The Company's sugar is marketed by United Sugars Corporation primarily to
industrial users such as confectioners, breakfast cereal manufacturers and
bakeries. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 1995, 84% (by weight) of the
Company's sugar production was sold to industrial users. The remaining portion
is marketed by United Sugars Corporation through sugar brokers to wholesalers
and retailers under the "Crystal Sugar" brand name and various private labels
for household consumption.
Customers are located primarily in Illinois, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin,
Pennsylvania, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri and Tennessee. During fiscal
1995, the Company's 10 largest customers purchased approximately 46% (by weight)
of the Company's sugar sold.
The prices at which United Sugars Corporation sells the Company's sugar
fluctuates periodically based on changes in domestic sugar supply and demand.
The largest proportion of American Crystal's sales are contracted one or more
quarters in advance, with the effect of stabilizing fluctuations in revenue from
quarter to quarter. Retail (grocery) products are sold on a spot price basis.
American Crystal markets dried beet pulp, molasses and CSB through Midwest
Agri-Commodities Company, a cooperative whose members are American Crystal,
Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative and Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative. Beet
pulp is marketed to livestock feed mixers and livestock feeders in the United
States and foreign markets. For the year ended August 31, 1995, approximately
95% of American Crystal's pulp production was exported to Japan and Europe. The
market for beet pulp is affected by the availability and quality of competitive
feedstuffs. Beet molasses is marketed primarily to yeast manufacturers,
pharmaceutical houses, livestock feed mixers and livestock feeders. By-product
sales accounted for approximately 9% of the Company's total revenues during
fiscal 1995. This relationship is primarily a function of the average market
prices for sugar, pulp and molasses and is not necessarily indicative of future
relationships between by-product and sugar revenues, because prices of these
commodities fluctuate independently of each other.
For a short period of time in the early 1990s, the Company (through United
Sugars) sold a portion of its sugar in the Canadian market. Due to the
imposition of significant duties, the Company does not currently consider Canada
to be a market for its products. The company believes that consumption in the
United States represents an adequate market for the Company's sugar.
GROWERS' CONTRACTS
American Crystal purchases virtually all of its sugarbeets from members
under contract with the Company. All members have five-year contracts with the
Company covering the growing seasons of 1993 through 1997 (the "Growers'
Contract"). In addition, each member has an annual contract with the
6
<PAGE>
Company specifying the number of acres the member is obligated to grow. Each
share of Preferred Stock held by a member entitles that member to grow one acre
of sugarbeets for sale to the Company. The Company's Board of Directors has the
discretion to adjust the acreage which may be planted for each share of
Preferred Stock held by the members. However, it is management's current
intention and recommendation to the Board of Directors that the relationship
between shares of Preferred Stock and acres of sugarbeet production be
maintained at a ratio of 1 to 1 for the foreseeable future, subject to
tolerances for overplanting and underplanting established by the Board each
year.
The total price for sugarbeets paid to a member (the "Net Beet Payment") is
based on the "Gross Beet Payment," as adjusted by certain allowances, costs, and
deductions. The Gross Beet Payment is the value of recovered sugar from the
beets a member delivers plus the member's share of by-product revenues, minus
the member's share of member business operating costs, including depreciation
and interest. The following allowances, costs and deductions, if applicable, are
used to adjust the Gross Beet Payment to arrive at the Net Beet Payment: hauling
allowance program costs, early delivery allowance program costs, minimum payment
allowance program costs, and unit retains. Growers are paid a hauling allowance
based on the distance they must transport beets for delivery to the Company and
may also receive minimum beet payments and an allowance for early delivery of
beets prior to the commencement of the stockpiling of harvested sugarbeets. The
costs of these programs are shared among members on the basis of the net tonnage
of beets delivered by each member.
Under the current Growers' Contracts, payments to members for sugarbeets
must be made in at least four installments: (i) on or about November 15, 60% of
the Company's estimate of the grower's Net Beet Payment; (ii) on or about March
31, an amount which combined with the November payment equals 85% of the
estimated Net Beet Payment; (iii) on or about September 30, an amount which
combined with the November and March payments equals 95% of the estimated Net
Beet Payment; and (iv) not more than 15 days after completion and acceptance of
the audit of the Company's annual financial statements, the remainder of the
member's Net Beet Payment. Except for unit retains, the Company must pay to
members for their sugarbeets all proceeds from the sale of sugar and by-products
in excess of related member business operating costs, as described above.
7
<PAGE>
The following tables summarize the "Gross Beet Payment" and "Net Beet
Payment" and the "Sugar Content of Sugarbeets" for each of the last 10 completed
fiscal years, respectively:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
DISTRIBUTION OF NET PROCEEDS--TOTALS (IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Proceeds.................. $222,816 $270,736 $216,878 $209,510 $259,229 $269,388 $303,842 $261,571 $320,549 $310,206
Non-Member (Income)/Loss...... 328 (802) 844 698 1,058 1,075 77 544 15 396
Hauling Allowance............. 5,115 5,769 3,482 3,900 4,140 5,522 5,413 4,531 6,144 6,038
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross Beet Payment............ $228,259 $275,703 $221,204 $214,108 $264,427 $275,985 $309,332 $266,646 $326,708 $316,640
Unit Retains.................. (8,745) (9,610) (7,316) (7,995) (8,010) (10,364) (20,223) (19,328) (16,648) (16,040)
Member Tax ADJ, Net........... (524) (3,141) 1,908 1,922 589 676 447 12,585 5,621 0
Hauling Allowance............. (5,115) (5,769) (3,482) (3,900) (4,140) (5,522) (5,413) (4,531) (6,144) (6,038)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net Beet Payment.............. $213,875 $257,183 $212,314 $204,135 $252,866 $260,775 $284,143 $255,372 $309,537 $294,562
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<CAPTION>
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
DISTRIBUTION OF NET PROCEEDS--PER TON HARVESTED(1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Proceeds.................. $ 38.19 $ 42.22 $ 44.44 $ 39.27 $ 48.50 $ 38.95 $ 45.03 $ 40.55 $ 38.47 $ 38.64
Non-Member (Income)/Loss...... 0.05 (0.12) 0.17 0.13 0.20 0.16 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.05
Hauling Allowance............. 0.88 0.90 0.71 0.73 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.74 0.75
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross Beet Payment............ $ 39.12 $ 43.00 $ 45.32 $ 40.13 $ 49.47 $ 39.91 $ 45.84 $ 41.34 $ 39.21 $ 39.44
Unit Retains.................. (1.50) (1.50) (1.50) (1.50) (1.50) (1.50) (3.00) (3.00) (2.00) (2.00)
Member Tax ADJ, Net........... (0.09) (0.49) 0.39 0.36 0.11 0.10 0.07 1.95 0.67 0.00
Hauling Allowance............. (0.88) (0.90) (0.71) (0.73) (0.77) (0.80) (0.80) (0.70) (0.74) (0.75)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net Beet Payment.............. $ 36.65 $ 40.11 $ 43.50 $ 38.26 $ 47.31 $ 37.71 $ 42.11 $ 39.59 $ 37.15 $ 36.69
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<CAPTION>
SUGAR CONTENT OF SUGARBEETS(1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tons Harvested (In
Thousands).................. 5,835 6,413 4,881 5,336 5,345 6,915 6,748 6,450 8,332 8,029
Tons Purchased Per Acre
Harvested................... 17.6 19.3 13.4 14.5 13.4 17.4 16.9 16.3 20.2 18.7
Sugar Content of Beets........ 17.1% 18.1% 18.2% 16.7% 18.6% 17.0% 18.0% 17.6% 16.8% 16.4%
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
(1) Information provided with respect to net proceeds, gross beet payment, tons
harvested per acre and sugar content of beets represents an average of the
financial and production results experienced by the Company's members. As
described elsewhere in this prospectus, the return to members for their
sugarbeets is based upon the value of the recovered sugar from the beets
delivered to the Company by each member. As a result of variations in the
sugar content of the sugarbeets delivered by the various members to the
Company, the payments received by the various members also vary.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
American Crystal operates a research complex in Moorhead, Minnesota. The
Research Center is primarily involved in the development of technologies related
to improved factory operations and development of process efficiency technology.
The Company's research and development expenses for 1996, 1995 and 1994 were
approximately $4,535,000, $4,669,000, and $4,566,000, respectively.
In recent years research conducted by the Company has been diversified into
technical services and agriculture research. Technical services has focused
primarily on the testing and evaluation of technologies related to improve
factory operations and development of process efficiency concepts. Technical
services research also concentrates on developing tests and recommending
instrumentation for use in monitoring beet sugar processes, including molasses
desugarization. The results of these efforts will allow plant operators to be
proactive and to react to problems quickly thereby improving the overall
recovery of sugar from the beets.
The Company is also engaged in ongoing research with respect to beet seed.
This research focuses primarily on the development of agricultural practices for
the piling and storage of sugarbeets, as well as the monitoring and treatment of
sugarbeet diseases and insect infestations. Additionally, coded variety testing
and reporting are key services this area provides for the growers. The results
of this testing is critical in assisting growers decision making during the
selection of beet seed for planting. The Company and its
8
<PAGE>
members also contribute resources to a number of public research institutions
for general research related to sugarbeets and their use. Those institutions
include North Dakota State University, University of Minnesota, University of
Minnesota--Crookston, the Beet Sugar Development Foundation and programs
operated by the USDA.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
American Crystal is subject to extensive federal and state environmental
laws and regulations with respect to water and air quality, solid waste disposal
and odor and noise control. The Company conducts an on-going and expanding
control program designed to meet these environmental laws and regulations.
American Crystal believes that it is in substantial compliance with applicable
environmental laws and regulations.
The Company was cited in July 1994 by the State of Minnesota for
non-compliance with nitrous oxide emissions for the pulp driers at the East
Grand Forks facility. The notice of violation indicated that the operation of
the East Grand Forks facility created emissions in excess of those described in
the permit previously granted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ("MPCA")
for that facility. The Company submitted an application to the MPCA requesting
that the limits be changed. The MPCA has not yet responded to this request. The
Company believes that the request will be granted.
The Company is in the process of converting the pulp drier operations at its
Moorhead and Crookston facilities. The conversion from coal to natural gas will
allow the Company to operate the driers in compliance with state and federal
requirements. Permits have been issued by the MPCA for the conversion. The
conversion for East Grand Forks was completed in 1995. The conversion for the
Moorhead and Crookston facilities is expected to be completed in 1996.
A notice of violation was received in April 1995, from the State of North
Dakota regarding emissions from the pulp drier at the Hillsboro factory. The
Company retested emissions from the drier and is in compliance with North Dakota
emission limits. Plans are also in place to convert the pulp driers at the
Drayton factory, through the use of natural gas as an energy source, to ensure
compliance with North Dakota emission limits.
JOINT VENTURE WITH PROGOLD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
American Crystal is one of three member of ProGold Limited Liability Company
("ProGold"). ProGold was formed in July, 1994 as a limited liability company to
serve as a joint venture mechanism for the Company, Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative
and Golden Growers Cooperative ("Golden Growers"), a North Dakota cooperative
association comprised of corn producers. The proposed purpose of the joint
venture is to construct and operate a corn wet milling plant capable of
processing corn to produce corn sweeteners (including high fructose corn
syrups), corn starch, corn oil, ethanol and various by-products.
American Crystal contributed a total of approximately $48 million for its
membership interest in ProGold and received a 46% interest in ProGold. Golden
Growers contributed approximately $51 million in exchange for a 49% interest in
ProGold, while Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative made a capital contribution of
approximately $5.2 million in exchange for a 5% interest in ProGold. Under the
terms of the ProGold Member Control Agreement, in each year after September 1,
1997, the ProGold Board of Governors can require that the three members of
ProGold provide additional capital contributions in an aggregate amount not to
exceed $5 million per year, with each member obligated to provide a portion of
that capital contribution proportionate to its ownership interest in ProGold. As
a result, the Company could be required to make annual contributions in an
amount not greater than $2.3 million per year, based on the Company's ownership
of a 46% interest in ProGold. Any other capital contributions can be required
only with the prior written consent of all of ProGold's members.
9
<PAGE>
Representatives of ProGold, the Company, Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative and
Golden Growers have entered into various agreements relating to the ownership
and operation of ProGold and the corn wet-milling plant. The contracts include
(i) contract marketing agreements under which United Sugars Corporation and
Midwest Agri-Commodities Company would market various products on behalf of
ProGold, (ii) Uniform Member Marketing Agreements under which American Crystal,
Minn-Dak and Golden Growers would be obligated to deliver to ProGold the corn to
be processed at the proposed plant and (iii) administrative services agreements
under which the Company would provide services such as accounting, financial
planning support and human resources services to both ProGold and Golden
Growers. When ProGold's corn wet-milling facility is fully operational, it is
expected to require 30 million bushels of corn for processing each year. The
Company will be responsible for providing corn to ProGold in proportion to the
Company's ownership interest in ProGold. As a result, the Company will need to
provide 46% of the corn used at ProGold's facility. In years when the ProGold
facility is operating at full capacity, the Company would be required to deliver
approximately 13.8 million bushels of corn to ProGold. Under the Company's
agreements with ProGold, the Company does not receive payment for the corn upon
delivery. Instead, the Company will receive payment of its proportionate share
of ProGold's revenues from sale of corn sweeteners and related products, less
its proportionate share of ProGold's operating expenses (which will not include
the cost of corn.) The distribution of ProGold's net revenues is intended to
provide both compensation for the corn delivered to ProGold by the Company and
the Company's share of ProGold's profits, if any. While ProGold intends to
distribute net revenues to its members as soon as possible following receipt of
proceeds from the sale of its products, the Company anticipates that it will
receive periodic distributions from ProGold during each year, with a final
distribution to be made following the close of ProGold's fiscal year. The
Company believes that ProGold could suffer a loss during its initial operations
of the corn wet-milling facility.
In connection with its involvement with ProGold, the Company provides a
variety of services related to corn procurement. Doing business under the name
"ProGold Grain", the Company, acting through certain of its employees, procures
corn to satisfy the obligations of the Company and Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative
to deliver corn to ProGold. In addition, the Company also manages the corn
procurement function and corn pool arrangements for Golden Growers. In the
performance of those services, the Company purchases large quantities of corn,
as well as entering into various commodities contracts (including hedge and
futures contracts) with the goal of reducing price, delivery and other risks
associated with the purchase of corn and sale of corn sweetener. The Company
anticipates that its ProGold Grain activities will increase after the corn
wet-milling plant begins operations.
Construction of the corn wet-milling plant has begun and is nearly complete,
with testing procedures due to commence during October, 1996. ProGold expects
that the plant will begin operations in late 1996. If there are significant
delays in completion of the plant, ProGold may not be able to obtain
certification of the plant by various customers on a schedule which will permit
ProGold to perform certain contractual obligations for the delivery of
sweeteners to those customers in a timely manner; as a result, a substantial
delay in commencement of operational activities could have a material, adverse
effect on ProGold.
If, through the operation of the corn wet-milling facility, ProGold is
successful in generating profits for distribution to is members, those
distributions would become the property of the Company. Under the Company's
Articles of Incorporation and By-laws, the return, if any, from the Company's
involvement with ProGold would be classified as amount received from
"non-patronage" sources. The Company's By-laws currently provide that any
non-patronage net income is to become the property of the Company and is not to
be distributed directly to the members of the Company. Distributions from
ProGold could, in the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors, redound to
the benefit of the Company's members through such means as future reductions of
annual unit retain amounts, repayment of unit retains in advance of the current
seven year repayment schedule and the use of such returns, if any, for capital
investment in the Company. To date, the Company's Board of Directors has not
adopted any resolutions or made any commitments regarding the distribution of
non-patronage revenues directly to the Company's
10
<PAGE>
members or the application of any such amounts for the indirect benefit of the
Company's members. As described above, any decisions regarding the application
of distributions received by the Company from ProGold will be made in the
discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.
EMPLOYEES
As of August 31, 1996, American Crystal had 1,187 full-time employees, of
which 877 were hourly, 310 were salaried and 31 were temporary workers. The
Company also employs approximately 1,250 additional hourly seasonal workers
during the sugarbeet harvest and approximately 575 hourly seasonal workers
during the remainder of the sugarbeet processing campaign.
Substantially all of the hourly employees at the factories, including
full-time and seasonal employees, are represented by the American Federation of
Grain Millers, AFL-CIO, and are covered by a collective bargaining agreement
expiring July 31, 1999. Office, clerical and management employees are not
unionized, except for certain office employees at the Moorhead and Crookston,
Minnesota, and Hillsboro, North Dakota, factories who are covered by the
collective bargaining agreement with the Grain Millers. The Company considers
its employee relations to be excellent.
Substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements of age and
length of service are covered by one of the Company's two retirement plans. Plan
A (nonunion employees) and Plan B (union employees) are defined benefit,
noncontributory plans. The plans provide for vesting in five years with benefits
for early retirement, normal retirement and disability or death. The Company's
policy is to fund pension costs accrued, and the plans were fully funded for
vested benefits as of February 28, 1996, the end of the most recent plan year.
Union and nonunion employees are also eligible to participate in 401(k) savings
plans.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
American Crystal operates five sugarbeet processing factories in the Red
River Valley. The factories are located in Crookston, East Grand Forks and
Moorhead, Minnesota and Drayton and Hillsboro, North Dakota. American Crystal
owns all of its factories and the land on which they are located. The factories
range in size from 150,000 to 400,000 square feet and have a combined beet
processing capacity, expressed in terms of quantity of sugarbeets which may be
sliced into strips or "cossettes", of approximately 30,400 tons per day. The
Crookston, Minnesota plant has a capacity of 5,300 tons of sugarbeets per day,
the East Grand Forks, Minnesota plant has a capacity of 8,000 tons of sugarbeets
per day and the Moorhead plant has a capacity of 5,300 tons of sugarbeets per
day. The Company's Hillsboro, North Dakota plant has a capacity of 5,900 tons of
sugarbeets per day, while the Drayton, North Dakota plant has a capacity of
5,900 tons of sugarbeets per day. Each of the processing factories includes the
physical facilities and equipment necessary to process sugarbeets into sugar.
Each factory has space for sugarbeet storage, including ventilated and cold
storage sites. However, only approximately 20% of the sugarbeet crop is stored
in either ventilated storage sites or cold storage facilities. Each processing
factory includes the washing and slicing equipment necessary to cut the
sugarbeets into cossettes, the diffusers necessary to extract sugar from the
cossettes in the form of "raw juice" and the purification systems necessary to
remove impurities from the raw juice. The factories also contain the evaporators
and vacuum pans necessary to thicken the raw juice and then to crystalize the
sugar. Each factory also contains the centrifuges and dryers necessary to
complete the process. The Company's sugar packaging facilities are located at
the Moorhead, Hillsboro, Crookston and East Grand Forks factories. Each of the
Company's facilities is currently operating at or near its capacity.
The Company has recently completed a number of capital improvements to its
sugar factories. For example, at both the Hillsboro and Drayton factories beet
storage facilities and refined sugar conditioning/ storage bins were added. (The
beet storage facilities allow for expanding acres by extending the length of the
beet slicing campaign. The sugar conditioning/storage bins are used to condition
and store refined
11
<PAGE>
sugar.) A clarifier mud press was added to the Moorhead factory to help reduce
odors. The Moorhead factory also completed a sugar screening station project
designed to improve the packaging operations there. A new beet piler was
purchased for the Drayton factory district to increase beet receiving capacity
and efficiency. New juice purification stations have been added at Drayton,
Crookston and Moorhead. Evaporation equipment at Hillsboro and East Grand Forks
has been upgraded.
The Board of Directors recently approved funding for a number of capital
expenditures aimed at enhancing the Company's processing capacity. During the
period ending on August 31, 1999, the Company proposes to spend a total of up to
$82.5 million on a new molasses desugarization facility. The new facility is
expected to increase the Company's sugar production significantly. From the date
hereof until August 31, 1998, the Company proposes to spend a total of up to
$56.9 million on increasing the ability of the current Hillsboro processing
facility to slice sugarbeets by approximately 1,800 tons per day.
American Crystal's corporate office is located in a 30,000 square foot,
two-story office building in Moorhead, Minnesota. The Company also has a 100,000
square foot research center situated on approximately 200 acres in Moorhead,
Minnesota, a portion of which is used for the offices of United Sugars
Corporation, the Company's marketing agent. (United Sugars Corporation does own
certain facilities separate from the facilities owned by the Company.) The
Company owns both facilities, and owns numerous sites as sugarbeet receiving and
storage stations. All the Company's property, plant and equipment is mortgaged
or pledged as collateral for its indebtedness to the St. Paul Bank for
Cooperatives.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time and in the ordinary course of its business, the Company is
named as a defendant in legal proceedings related to various issues, including
worker's compensation claims, tort claims and contractual disputes. The Company
is currently involved in certain legal proceedings which have arisen in the
ordinary course of American Crystal's business; the Company is also aware of
certain other potential claims which could result in the commencement of legal
proceedings. The Company carries insurance which provides protection against
certain types of claims. With respect to current litigation and potential claims
of which the Company is aware, the Company's management believes that (i) the
Company has insurance protection to cover all or a portion of any judgments
which may be rendered against the Company with respect to certain claims or
actions and (ii) any judgments which may be entered against the Company and
which may exceed such insurance coverage or which may arise in actions involving
potential liabilities not covered by insurance policies are not likely to have a
material adverse effect upon the Company, or its assets or operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's shareholders during the
quarter ended August 31, 1996.
12
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
There is only a limited, private market for shares of the Company's Common
or Preferred Stock, as such shares may be held only by farmer-producers who are
eligible for membership in the Company. The Company's shares are not listed for
trading on any exchange or quotation system. Although transfers of the Company's
shares may occur only with the consent of the Company's Board of Directors, the
Company does not obtain information regarding the transfer price in connection
with such transfers. As a result, the Company is not able to provide information
regarding the prices at which the Company's shares have be transferred.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues.......................................... $ 688,012 $ 605,960 $ 563,420 $ 542,665 $ 545,220
Net Proceeds Before Accounting Change............. $ 310,206 $ 320,549 $ 273,785 $ 303,842 $ 269,388
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change (1)........ -- -- (12,214) -- --
Net Proceeds (2).................................. $ 310,206 $ 320,549 $ 261,571 $ 303,842 $ 269,388
Total Assets...................................... $ 465,136 $ 420,890 $ 324,469 $ 303,318 $ 278,989
Long-term Debt, including current maturities...... $ 190,919 $ 119,029 $ 115,834 $ 98,039 $ 91,615
Members' Investments.............................. $ 152,136 $ 142,047 $ 115,609 $ 120,113 $ 107,679
Property and Equipment Additions, net of
retirements..................................... $ 43,168 $ 48,394 $ 50,824 $ 35,659 $ 42,046
Working Capital................................... $ 32,071 $ 28,046 $ 30,859 $ 32,819 $ 27,254
Ratio of Long-Term Debt to Equity (3)............. 1.17:1 .75:1 .88:1 .71:1 .71:1
Ratio of Net Proceeds to Fixed Charges (4)........ 14.3 11.6 15.0 14.2 15.0
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) During 1994, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other than
Pensions" and Financial Accounting Standards No. 112, "Employers Accounting
for Post-employment Benefits." The cumulative effect of application of the
new standards resulted in the reduction of net proceeds shown above for the
year ended August, 1994. See note number 8 to the Financial Statements for a
more detailed description of the accounting change.
(2) Net Proceeds are the Company's gross revenues, less the costs and expenses
of producing and marketing sugar, by-products and beet seed, but before
payments to members for sugarbeets. Payments to be made to members for the
delivery of sugarbeets are liabilities of the Company. (For a more complete
description of the calculation of Net Proceeds, see "Business--Growers'
Contracts".)
(3) Calculated by dividing the Company's long term debt, exclusive of the
current maturities of such debt, by members' investments.
(4) Computed by dividing (i) the sum of Net Proceeds plus interest plus
depreciation by (ii) the sum of interest plus principal payments. Although
the Company does lease certain items, such as some office furniture, office
equipment and computers, due to the proportionately small amounts involved,
such lease payments have not been included in the total of the Company's
Fixed Charges or the calculation of this ratio.
13
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS:
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Because American Crystal operates as a cooperative, payments for member
delivered sugarbeets, the principal raw material used in producing the sugar and
agri-products it sells, are subordinated to all member business expenses. In
addition, actual cash payments to members are spread over a period of
approximately one year following delivery of their sugarbeet crops to American
Crystal and are net of unit retains allocated to them, both of which remain
available to meet American Crystal's capital requirements. This member financing
arrangement may result in an additional source of liquidity and reduced outside
financing requirements in comparison to a similar business operated on a
non-cooperative basis. However, because sugar is sold throughout the year (while
sugarbeets are processed primarily in the fall and winter) and because
substantial amounts of equipment are required for its operations, American
Crystal has utilized substantial outside financing on both a seasonal and
long-term basis to fund such operations. The majority of such financing has been
provided by the St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives (the "Bank"). American Crystal
has a short-term line of credit with the Bank in 1996 of $210 million. The
Company also expects to expand its commercial paper program, which may provide
short-term borrowings of up to $75 million.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INDUSTRY ENVIRONMENT
During most of the 1970s and 1980s, the sweetener industry witnessed two
significant trends: the increase in consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners,
principally aspartame, and the increased use of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS)
in place of refined sugar (sucrose) in certain food products, primarily
beverages.
During the late 1980s and the early 1990s, the domestic consumption of
refined sugar continuously increased, from 146 million hundredweights in 1986 to
174 million hundredweights in 1995. The growth has been at a compounded rate of
approximately 2% a year during that period. The Company believes that this
recent market trend has been due to population growth and general acceptability
of sugar as a desirable natural ingredient of a normal diet.
The Company's results of operations are substantially dependent on market
factors, including domestic prices for refined sugar. These market factors are
influenced by a variety of forces, including weather conditions and United
States farm and trade policy, that the company is unable to predict. See
"Business--Government Programs and Regulations." In addition, weather conditions
during the growing, harvesting and processing seasons, as well as diseases and
insects, may materially affect the quality and quantity of sugar beets available
for purchase as well as the unit costs of raw materials and processing.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996, AND 1995
Revenue for the year ended August 31, 1996, was $688.0 million, an increase
of $82.0 million from 1995. Revenue from total sugar sales increased 15.4%,
reflecting a 12.6% increase in hundredweight sold and a 2.5% increase in the
average selling price per hundredweight. Revenue from pulp sales decreased 7.5%,
due to a 16.9% decrease in the volume of pulp sold partially offset by an 11.3%
increase in the average selling price per ton. Revenue from molasses sales
increased 32.4%, due to a 29.0% increase in the volume of molasses sold and a
2.6% increase in the average selling price per ton. Revenue from Concentrated
Separated By-Products ("CSB") increased 4.6%, due to a 2.4% increase in the
volume of a CSB sold and a 2.2% increase in the average selling price per ton.
Revenue from beet seed sales was down 4.5%, primarily due to decreased sales
volume offset by an increase in sales prices.
14
<PAGE>
Cost of product sold, exclusive of payments to members for sugarbeets,
increased $72.5 million. The increase was primarily due to changes in product
inventory levels between 1996 and 1995, which impacted the cost of product sold
unfavorably by $77.1 million. Direct processing costs for sugar and pulp
decreased 2.5% primarily due to the harvesting and processing of a 3.6% smaller
crop. Fixed and committed expenses decreased by 2.9% due to a shorter processing
campaign.
Selling expenses increased $17.9 million. The increase is attributable
primarily to increased sales volume. General and administrative expenses
increased $4.5 million due primarily to higher Information Services costs,
capital projects expense and general increases in personnel costs, partially
offset by a favorable settlement of an IRS tax case.
Interest expense decreased $3.2 million from $14.5 million in 1995, to $11.3
million in 1996. This resulted from lower 1996 average interest rates for both
long-term and short-term debt, partially offset by higher average borrowing
levels.
Non-member business activities resulted in a loss of $396,000 in 1996 and a
loss of $15,000 in 1995.
Unit retains of $16.0 million and $16.6 million were withheld from members
in 1996 and 1995, respectively. The unit retain per-ton-purchased was $2.00 in
1996 and 1995.
Payments to members for sugarbeets decreased by $14.9 million from $309.5
million in 1995 to $294.6 million in 1996. The decrease is attributable
primarily to a decrease in tons harvested and a lower average sugar content from
the 1995 crop of sugarbeets.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1995, AND 1994
Revenue for the year ended August 31, 1995 was $606 million, an increase of
$42.5 million from 1994. Revenue from total sugar sales increased 4.6%,
reflecting a 1.3% increase in hundredweight sold and a 3.3% increase in the
average selling price per hundredweight. Revenue from pulp sales increased
42.8%, due to a 41.6% increase in the volume of pulp sold and an 0.8% increase
in the average selling price per ton. Revenue from molasses sales increased
49.9% due to a 36.1% increase in the volume of molasses sold and a 10.1%
increase in the average selling price per ton. Revenue from beet seed sales was
down 4.1% primarily due to decreased sales volume.
Cost of product sold, exclusive of payments for sugarbeets, decreased $25.4
million from $169.1 million in 1994 to $143.7 million in 1995. This was
primarily due to changes in product inventory levels between 1995 and 1994,
which impacted the cost of product sold favorably by $61.2 million. Also, the
cost of product sold was partially offset by increased process costs associated
with a large crop and higher costs for purchased sugar due to increased sales
volume.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $19.1 million from
$113.7 million to $132.8 million. This was due primarily to higher selling
expenses associated with the increased volumes of products sold. General and
administrative expenses increased 15.4% due primarily to higher outside service
costs and general increases in personnel costs.
Interest expenses increased $6.6 million from $7.9 million in 1994 to $14.5
million in 1995. This resulted from a higher 1995 average borrowing levels and
higher interest rates for both long-term and short-term debt.
Non-member business activities resulted in a loss of $15,000 in 1995 and a
loss of $544,000 in 1994.
Unit retains of $16.6 million and $19.3 million were withheld form members
in 1995 and 1994, respectively. The unit retain per-ton-purchased was $2.00 in
1995 and $3.00 in 1994.
Payments to members for sugarbeets increased by $54.1 million from $255.4
million in 1994, to $309.5 million in 1995 due primarily to an increase in tons
harvested in the 1994 crop.
15
<PAGE>
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1994, AND 1993
Revenue for the year ended August 31, 1994 was $563.4 million, an increase
of $20.7 million from 1993. Revenue from total sugar sales increased 6.0%,
reflecting an 8.3% increase in hundredweight sold partially offset by a 2.2%
decrease in the average selling price per hundredweight. Revenue from pulp sales
decreased 12.1% due to a 12.8% decrease in the volume of pulp sold partially
offset by an 0.8% increase in the average selling price per ton. Revenue from
molasses sales decreased 45.5% due to a 53.6% decrease in the volume of molasses
sold partially offset by a 17.4% increase in the average selling price per ton.
The large decrease in molasses volume was due primarily to the reprocessing of
molasses into refined sugar through the desugarization process. Revenue from
beet seed sales was up 7.3% primarily due to increased sales volume.
Cost of product sold, exclusive of payments for sugarbeets, increased $48.6
million from $123.0 million in 1993, to $169.1 million in 1994. This was
primarily due to changes in product inventory levels between 1994 and 1993,
which impacted the cost of product sold unfavorably by $37.7 million. Also,
contributing to this variance was increased depreciation and process costs
associated with the desugarization process and higher costs for purchased sugar
due to increased sales volume.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $4.5 million from
$109.2 million to $113.7 million. This was due primarily to higher sugar selling
expenses associated with the increased volume of sugar sold partially offset by
lower pulp and molasses selling expenses associated with the lower sales volumes
of these products. General and administrative expenses and research expenses
decreased 19.8% due primarily to lower personnel costs in 1994 and
reorganization costs incurred in 1993.
Interest expense increased $700,000 from $7.2 million in 1993, to $7.9
million in 1994. This resulted from a higher 1994 average borrowing level for
long-term debt partially offset by lower average interest rates for long-term
debt and lower average borrowings for short-term debt.
Non-member business activities resulted in a loss of $544,000 in 1994 and a
loss of $77,000 in 1993.
Unit retains of $19.3 million and $20.2 million were withheld from members
in 1994 and 1993, respectively. The unit retain per-ton-purchased was $3.00 in
1994 and 1993.
Payments to members for sugarbeets decreased by $28.7 million from $284.1
million in 1993, to $255.4 million in 1994 due primarily to a decrease in tons
harvested and the lower sugar content of the 1993 crop.
1996 CROP AND ESTIMATED FISCAL YEAR 1997 INFORMATION
As noted in the "Growers Contracts" subsection of the "Description of
Business", the agreements between the Company and its members regarding the
delivery of sugarbeets to the Company require payment for members' sugarbeets in
four installments throughout the year after harvest of the applicable sugarbeet
crop. As only the final payment is made after the close of the fiscal year in
question, the first three payments to members for their sugarbeets are, of
necessity, based upon the Company's then-current estimates of the Net Beet
Payment arising from the processing of the crop in question and the subsequent
sale of the products obtained from processing those sugarbeets. This discussion
contains a summary of the Company's current estimates of the financial results
to be obtained from the Company's processing of the 1996 sugarbeet crop. There
can be no assurance that such estimates will prove accurate; in addition, the
Company believes that the estimates set froth in this section will be subject to
change as a result of factors beyond the control of the Company. As indicated
above, the Company will prepare new, then-current estimates in connection with
the payment to the members of the second and third installments of the Net Beet
Payment. (Those installments are expected to be made to the members with respect
to the 1996 sugarbeet crop on or about March 31, 1997 and September 30, 1997,
respectively.)
16
<PAGE>
The recently completed harvest of the sugarbeet crop grown during 1996
produced a total of 8.3 million tons of sugarbeets, or approximately 18.1 tons
of sugarbeets per acre from roughly 459,000 acres. That production exceeded 16.8
tons per acre, which is the ten-year average of tons per acre for the years from
1986 through 1995. The sugar content of the 1996 crop is 17.34%, in comparison
to a ten year average for the applicable period of approximately 17.5%. The
Company expects to produce a total of roughly 21.9 million hundredweight of
sugar from the 1996 sugarbeet crop, representing an estimated increase of
approximately 2,000,000 hundredweight of sugar in comparison to the 1995
sugarbeet crop. Such sugar production provides a total sugar recovery of
approximately 273 pounds of sugar for each ton of sugarbeets harvested by the
Company.
Based on marketing information developed by United Sugars Corporation, the
Company's current estimate is that the average net selling price of the
Company's sugar will be approximately $24.30 per hundredweight, an increase of
nearly $1.00 from the ten year average of $23.36. The effect of the estimated
net selling price, when combined with the Company's anticipated recovery of
sugar from each ton of sugarbeets, results in expected sugar revenue per ton of
sugarbeets in an amount equal to $64.03 per ton.
To the revenue from the Company's sales of sugar must be added revenue
produced by the agri-products: molasses, beet pulp and Concentrated Separated
By-product. As the Company's estimates of the net selling prices for the
agri-products are greater than the net selling prices for such products produced
from the 1995 crop, the Company anticipates obtaining additional revenue of
$6.99 per ton of sugarbeets.
From the revenues generated from the sale of products produced from each ton
of sugarbeets must be deducted the Company's operating costs, which are
currently estimated to be $26.18 per ton. The deduction of those operating costs
results in an estimated gross beet payment of $44.84 per ton of sugarbeets. With
the subsequent deduction of a hauling allowance of $0.84 per ton and anticipated
unit retains of $2.00 per ton for the fiscal year ending on August 31, 1997, the
Company's current estimated Net Beet Payment is $42.00 per ton of sugarbeets. If
successful in achieving the estimated results, the Company's Net Beet Payment
will exceed the ten year average Net Beet Payment by roughly $2.70 per ton.
THE COMPANY'S CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN
The Company's Board of Directors and management have been involved in a
continuing process of reviewing the Company's current business and plans for the
future. In considering the Company's future activities, the Company's Board of
Directors and management have focused on possible scenarios in which the
marketplace might present a future environment in which prices for the Company's
products remain relatively stable while the Company's costs might increase at
roughly the rate of inflation. In order to prevent the possible negative impact
if such a scenario were to arise, the Company's Board of Directors and
management have identified four key strategies which the Company intends to
pursue. First, the Company believes that it would be in the best interest of the
Company to increase its market share. Second, the Company believes it
appropriate to optimize the selling price for its products while, third,
maintaining its current low cost producer status by further reducing costs.
Finally, the Company will seek to continue its efforts to diversify its
business.
With respect to increasing the Company's share of the domestic market for
sugar, the Company believes that it could sell more product if it could produce
the additional sugar. However, including the sugarbeet production represented by
the shares of Preferred Stock to be sold in the offering described in this
prospectus, the Company's facilities will be near their current production
capacity. Instead of investing the substantial sums necessary to build another
sugarbeet processing facility, the Company's management proposes to increase the
Company's capacity to process sugarbeets through sequential increases in
processing capacity at some of the Company's current facilities over the course
of the next ten years. The Company believes that adopting such a procedure will
allow the Company to complete an appropriate course of expansion without being
exposed to excessive debt or financing risk and while still allowing the Company
to retain the flexibility to reconsider the decision with respect to each
incremental increase in
17
<PAGE>
production capacity immediately prior to engaging in that activity. The Company
also believes that it may be possible for the Company to increase its market
share through acquisitions of or joint ventures with other sugar producers. The
Company will consider each such transaction if and when such opportunities
arise.
In order to obtain the best selling price for its products, the Company
intends to focus on sales and marketing strategies which allow the Company to
provide its customers with an appropriate mixture of the Company's products. For
example, once the ProGold corn sweetener plant begins operations, the Company
will seek opportunities to sell both sugar and sweetener products to the same
customers. The Company also believes that additional storage capacity will allow
the Company additional flexibility in managing its inventory and sales and
marketing strategies.
To pursue the goal of maintaining and improving upon its current status as a
low cost producer, the Company intends to focus on working with its members to
increase the productivity of the members' sugarbeet farming operations. In
addition, the Company plans to focus on cost reduction at the factory level. At
the member level, the Company expects to focus on, among others, programs for
nitrogen management and new seed varieties. At the factory level, the Company
intends to pursue expansion of the Company's molasses desugarization
capabilities and on-going maintenance and improvement related to, for example,
diffuser replacement at the East Grand Forks, Crookston and Moorhead factories.
Finally, the Company will continue to pursue opportunities to diversify the
Company's business in the best interest of the Company and its members. Such
efforts are expected to include a continuation of the Company's involvement with
ProGold LLC and careful consideration of such other opportunities as may arise.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
18
<PAGE>
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Report of Independent Auditors........................................ F-3
Balance Sheets as of August 31, 1996, and 1995........................ F-4
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended August 31, 1996, 1995,
and 1994............................................................. F-6
Statements of Changes in Members' Investment for the Years Ended
August 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994...................................... F-7
Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended August 31, 1996, 1995, and
1994................................................................. F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................ F-9
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
F-2
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Members of American Crystal Sugar Company,
Moorhead, Minnesota
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of the American Crystal
Sugar Company (a Minnesota agricultural cooperative corporation) as of August
31, 1996, and 1995, and the related statements of operations, changes in
members' investments and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended August 31, 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the American Crystal Sugar
Company as of August 31, 1996, and 1995, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 1996,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
As described in Note 1 to the financial statements, the company changed its
method of depreciating certain classes of property and equipment in 1996.
/s/ Eide Helmeke PLLP
Eide Helmeke PLLP
October 8, 1996
Fargo, North Dakota
F-3
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AUGUST 31
------------------------
1996 1995
----------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents............................................................. $ 3,807 $ 3,420
Receivables:
Trade................................................................................. 50,915 48,113
Members............................................................................... 3,845 4,207
Other................................................................................. 1,399 5,194
Advances to Related Parties............................................................. 10,308 6,091
Inventories............................................................................. 72,677 103,291
Prepaid Expenses........................................................................ 3,088 3,825
----------- -----------
Total Current Assets.................................................................... 146,039 174,141
----------- -----------
Property and Equipment:
Land.................................................................................. 12,059 11,876
Buildings and Equipment............................................................... 572,446 535,587
Construction in Progress.............................................................. 41,098 36,934
Less Accumulated Depreciation......................................................... (391,665) (373,709)
----------- -----------
Net Property and Equipment.............................................................. 233,938 210,688
----------- -----------
Other Assets:
Investments in Banks for Cooperatives................................................. 15,177 13,932
Investments in Marketing Cooperatives................................................. 15,468 5,545
Investments in ProGold Limited Liability Company...................................... 51,330 12,452
Other Assets.......................................................................... 3,184 4,132
----------- -----------
Total Other Assets...................................................................... 85,159 36,061
----------- -----------
Total Assets............................................................................ $ 465,136 $ 420,890
----------- -----------
----------- -----------
</TABLE>
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' INVESTMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AUGUST 31
----------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Current Liabilities:
Short-Term Debt......................................................................... $ 13,643 $ 53,932
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt.................................................... 13,525 12,115
Accounts Payable........................................................................ 24,550 25,893
Other Current Liabilities............................................................... 15,132 13,918
Amounts Due Members..................................................................... 47,118 40,237
---------- ----------
Total Current Liabilities................................................................. 113,968 146,095
Long-Term Debt, Net of Current Maturities................................................. 177,394 106,914
Deferred Income Taxes..................................................................... -- 1,029
Other Liabilities......................................................................... 21,638 24,805
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities......................................................................... 313,000 278,843
---------- ----------
Members' Investments:
Preferred Stock......................................................................... 31,879 31,879
Common Stock............................................................................ 24 23
Additional Paid-in Capital.............................................................. 33,041 32,417
Unit Retains............................................................................ 97,191 88,487
Pension Liability Adjustment............................................................ (4,518) (5,674)
Retained Earnings....................................................................... (5,481) (5,085)
---------- ----------
Total Members' Investments................................................................ 152,136 142,047
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities and Members' Investments................................................ $ 465,136 $ 420,890
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31
----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Revenue.................................................................... $ 688,012 $ 605,960 $ 563,420
Cost of Product Sold, Excluding Payments to Members for Sugarbeets............. 216,229 143,652 169,112
---------- ---------- ----------
Gross Proceeds................................................................. 471,783 462,308 394,308
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses................................... 155,188 132,752 113,679
---------- ---------- ----------
Operating Proceeds............................................................. 316,595 329,556 280,629
---------- ---------- ----------
Other Income (Expense):
Interest Income.............................................................. 485 281 641
Other Income................................................................. 4,200 1,934 2,081
Interest Expense, Net........................................................ (11,252) (14,532) (7,859)
Other Expenses............................................................... (371) (612) (1,419)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total Other Income (Expense)................................................... (6,938) (12,929) (6,556)
---------- ---------- ----------
Proceeds Before Income Taxes................................................... 309,657 316,627 274,073
Income Tax Benefit/(Expense)................................................... 549 3,922 (288)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net Proceeds Before Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principle....... 310,206 320,549 273,785
Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principle........................... -- -- (12,214)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net Proceeds Resulting from Member and Non-Member Business..................... $ 310,206 $ 320,549 $ 261,571
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------
Distribution of Net Proceeds:
Credited (Charged) to Members' Investments:
Member Tax Accounting Adjustment, Net...................................... $ -- $ (5,621) $ (12,585)
Non-Member Business (Loss)................................................. (396) (15) (544)
Unit Retains Declared to Members........................................... 16,040 16,648 19,328
---------- ---------- ----------
Net Credit to Members' Investments............................................. 15,644 11,012 6,199
Payments to Members for Sugarbeets, Net of Unit Retains Declared............... 294,562 309,537 255,372
---------- ---------- ----------
Total.......................................................................... $ 310,206 $ 320,549 $ 261,571
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS' INVESTMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONAL PENSION
PREFERRED PAID-IN UNIT LIABILITY
STOCK COMMON STOCK CAPITAL RETAINS ADJUSTMENT
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1993.................... $ 30,429 $ 21 $ 5,558 $ 71,076 $ (651)
Member Tax Accounting Adjustment, Net..... -- -- -- -- --
Non-Member Business (Loss)................ -- -- -- -- --
Unit Retains Withheld from Members
($3.00/Ton)............................. -- -- -- 19,328 --
Payments to Estates and Disabled
Individuals............................. -- -- -- (552) --
Payments of 1986 Crop Unit Retains to
Members................................. -- -- -- (8,419) --
Pension Liability Adjustment.............. -- -- -- -- (1,735)
Common Stock Issued/(Redeemed), Net....... -- 3 -- -- --
------------- --- ------------- ------------- -------------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1994.................... $ 30,429 $ 24 $ 5,558 $ 81,433 $ (2,386)
------------- --- ------------- ------------- -------------
Member Tax Accounting Adjustment, Net..... -- -- -- -- --
Non-Member Business (Loss)................ -- -- -- -- --
Unit Retains Withheld from Members
($2.00/Ton)............................. -- -- -- 16,648 --
Payments to Estates and Disabled
Individuals............................. -- -- -- (374) --
Payments of 1987 Crop Unit Retains to
Members................................. -- -- -- (9,220) --
Contributed Capital of Investee........... -- -- 460 -- --
Pension Liability Adjustment.............. -- -- -- -- (3,288)
Stock Issued/(Redeemed), Net.............. 1,450 (1) 26,399 -- --
------------- --- ------------- ------------- -------------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1995.................... $ 31,879 $ 23 $ 32,417 $ 88,487 $ (5,674)
------------- --- ------------- ------------- -------------
Member Tax Accounting Adjustment, Net..... -- -- -- -- --
Non-Member Business (Loss)................ -- -- -- -- --
Unit Retains Withheld from Members
($2.00/Ton)............................. -- -- -- 16,040 --
Payments to Estates and Disabled
Individuals............................. -- -- -- (296) --
Payments of 1988 Crop Unit Retains to
Members................................. -- -- -- (7,040) --
Contributed Capital of Investee........... -- -- 624 -- --
Pension Liability Adjustment.............. -- -- -- -- 1,156
Stock Issued/(Redeemed), Net.............. -- 1 -- -- --
------------- --- ------------- ------------- -------------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1996.................... $ 31,879 $ 24 $ 33,041 $ 97,191 $ (4,518)
------------- --- ------------- ------------- -------------
------------- --- ------------- ------------- -------------
<CAPTION>
RETAINED
EARNINGS TOTAL
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1993.................... $ 13,680 $ 120,113
Member Tax Accounting Adjustment, Net..... (12,585) (12,585)
Non-Member Business (Loss)................ (544) (544)
Unit Retains Withheld from Members
($3.00/Ton)............................. -- 19,328
Payments to Estates and Disabled
Individuals............................. -- (552)
Payments of 1986 Crop Unit Retains to
Members................................. -- (8,419)
Pension Liability Adjustment.............. -- (1,735)
Common Stock Issued/(Redeemed), Net....... -- 3
------------- -------------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1994.................... $ 551 $ 115,609
------------- -------------
Member Tax Accounting Adjustment, Net..... (5,621) (5,621)
Non-Member Business (Loss)................ (15) (15)
Unit Retains Withheld from Members
($2.00/Ton)............................. -- 16,648
Payments to Estates and Disabled
Individuals............................. -- (374)
Payments of 1987 Crop Unit Retains to
Members................................. -- (9,220)
Contributed Capital of Investee........... -- 460
Pension Liability Adjustment.............. -- (3,288)
Stock Issued/(Redeemed), Net.............. -- 27,848
------------- -------------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1995.................... $ (5,085) $ 142,047
------------- -------------
Member Tax Accounting Adjustment, Net..... -- --
Non-Member Business (Loss)................ (396) (396)
Unit Retains Withheld from Members
($2.00/Ton)............................. -- 16,040
Payments to Estates and Disabled
Individuals............................. -- (296)
Payments of 1988 Crop Unit Retains to
Members................................. -- (7,040)
Contributed Capital of Investee........... -- 624
Pension Liability Adjustment.............. -- 1,156
Stock Issued/(Redeemed), Net.............. -- 1
------------- -------------
BALANCE, AUGUST 31, 1996.................... $ (5,481) $ 152,136
------------- -------------
------------- -------------
</TABLE>
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31
-------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Provided By (Used In) Operations:
Net Proceeds Resulting from Member and Non-Member Business............... $ 310,206 $ 320,549 $ 261,571
Payments to Members for Sugarbeets, Net of Unit Retains.................. (294,562) (309,537) (255,372)
Add (Deduct) Non-Cash Items:
Depreciation and Amortization............................................ 20,314 28,174 25,117
Deferred Income Taxes.................................................... (1,216) (3,629) 175
Loss on the Disposition of Property and Equipment........................ 230 50 48
Non-Cash Portion of Patronage Dividend from the Banks for Cooperatives... (1,404) (1,653) (1,111)
Deferred Gain Recognition................................................ (223) (223) (149)
Changes in Certain Elements of Working Capital:
Accounts Receivable:
Trade.................................................................. (2,802) (14,120) (1,261)
Members................................................................ 362 8 (231)
Other.................................................................. 3,795 (2,827) (579)
Inventories.............................................................. 30,614 (49,511) 16,243
Prepaid Expenses......................................................... 737 1,727 540
Advances to Related Parties.............................................. (4,217) (1,898) 3,073
Accounts Payable......................................................... (1,343) 9,831 (2,758)
Other Current Liabilities................................................ 1,214 525 1,675
Amount Due Members....................................................... 6,881 (3,658) (232)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Cash (Used)/Provided By Operations..................................... 68,586 (26,192) 46,749
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities:
Purchases of Property and Equipment...................................... (43,549) (48,636) (50,015)
Proceeds from the Sale of Property and Equipment......................... 151 191 135
Investment in Banks for Cooperatives..................................... 159 770 1,178
Investments in Marketing Cooperatives.................................... (9,700) (4,482) (405)
Investment in ProGold Limited Liability Company.......................... (38,878) (12,262) (190)
Changes in Other Assets.................................................. (271) 178 (449)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities...................................... (92,088) (64,241) (49,746)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities:
Net Proceeds (Payments) on Short-Term Debt............................... (40,289) 53,932 (4,568)
Proceeds from Long-Term Debt............................................. 85,000 20,300 30,100
Long-Term Debt Repayment................................................. (13,115) (17,110) (12,310)
Payment of Unit Retains.................................................. (7,336) (9,594) (8,971)
Changes in Preferred Stock............................................... -- 1,450 --
Changes in Common Stock.................................................. 1 1 3
Changes in Additional Paid-In Capital.................................... 623 26,859 --
Changes in Other Long-Term Liabilities................................... (995) 3,601 10,734
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities.................................. 23,889 79,439 14,988
----------- ----------- -----------
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents........................... 387 (10,994) 11,991
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period............................. 3,420 14,414 2,423
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period................................... $ 3,807 $ 3,420 $ 14,414
----------- ----------- -----------
----------- ----------- -----------
</TABLE>
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements.
F-8
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
ORGANIZATION
American Crystal Sugar Company (American Crystal) is a Minnesota
agricultural cooperative corporation, which processes and markets sugar and
sugar beet pulp, molasses and seed. Business done with its shareholders
(members) constitutes "patronage business" as defined by the Internal Revenue
Code and the net proceeds therefrom are credited to members' investments in the
form of unit retains or distributed to members in the form of payments for sugar
beets. Members are paid the net amounts realized from the current year's
production less member operating costs determined on a book basis.
On April 26, 1995, the Company's shareholders amended the Bylaws of the
Company and the Grower Agreement between the Company and each of its
shareholders. The amendment changed the method by which the grower beet payment
is determined. Previously, the grower beet payment was on the basis of the
Company's taxable income. Effective with the fiscal year beginning September 1,
1995, the grower beet payment is calculated on the basis of the Company's book
income as reported in its financial statements.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
American Crystal considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with
a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. American Crystal
places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial
institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the applicable
insurance limit.
RECEIVABLES
American Crystal grants credit, individually and through its marketing
cooperatives, to its customers which are primarily companies in the food
processing industry located throughout the United States. Ongoing credit
evaluations of customers' financial condition are performed and the Company
maintains a reserve for potential credit losses. American Crystal does not
believe it is dependent upon one or a few customers.
INVENTORIES
Sugar, pulp and molasses inventories are valued at estimated net realizable
value. Maintenance parts and supplies and beet seed inventories are valued at
the lower of average cost or market.
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principals requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND DEPRECIATION
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Indirect costs and construction
period interest are capitalized as a component of the cost of qualified assets.
Property and equipment are depreciated for financial reporting purposes
principally using straight line methods with estimated useful lives ranging from
3 to 45 years. Statutory lives and methods are used for income tax reporting
purposes.
F-9
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: (CONTINUED)
Property and equipment acquired prior to September 1, 1995, was depreciated
for financial statement purposes, principally using declining balance methods
with estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 45 years. Effective September 1,
1995, property and equipment was depreciated using the straight-line method. The
straight-line method of depreciation was adopted during fiscal 1996 to more
accurately reflect the allocation of the cost of the property and equipment in
the proper period and to conform with general industry practice. The effect of
the change was to increase net proceeds resulting from member and non-member
business for the year ended August 31, 1996, by $9.7 million.
Indirect costs capitalized were $1.0 million, $845,000 and $1.1 million in
1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Construction-period interest capitalized was
$3.8 million, $1.5 million and $1.4 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
INVESTMENTS
Investments in the Banks for Cooperatives are stated at cost plus unredeemed
patronage refunds received or estimated to be received in the form of capital
stock. Investments in Marketing Cooperatives and ProGold Limited Liability
Company (ProGold) are accounted for using the equity method.
MEMBERS' INVESTMENTS
PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK--The ownership of common and preferred stock is
restricted to a "farm operator" as defined by the bylaws of American Crystal.
Each "farm operator" may own only one share of common stock and is entitled to
one vote in the affairs of American Crystal. Each "farm operator" is entitled to
grow a specified number of acres of sugar beets in proportion to the shares of
preferred stock owned. The preferred shares are non-voting. All transfers of
stock must be approved by American Crystal's board of directors and any
shareholder desiring to sell stock must first offer it to American Crystal for
repurchase at its par value. American Crystal has never exercised this
repurchase option. The bylaws do not allow dividends to be paid on either the
common or preferred stock. The articles of incorporation of the Company were
amended to allow recapitalization of the Company to authorize the issuance of
600,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $76.77. As part of that
recapitalization, each share of preferred stock was changed and reclassified
into 65/100 (.65) of one share of preferred stock, with par value of $76.77 per
share.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES
SHARES ISSUED &
PAR VALUE AUTHORIZED OUTSTANDING
----------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Preferred Stock:
August 31, 1996...................................... $ 76.77 600,000 415,255
August 31, 1995...................................... 76.77 600,000 415,255
August 31, 1994...................................... 50.00 700,000 608,582
Common Stock:
August 31, 1996...................................... $ 10.00 4,000 2,441
August 31, 1995...................................... 10.00 4,000 2,343
August 31, 1994...................................... 10.00 4,000 2,363
</TABLE>
UNIT RETAINS--The bylaws authorize American Crystal's board of directors to
require additional direct capital investments by members in the form of a
variable unit retain of up to a maximum of 10% of the weighted average gross
per-ton beet payment.
F-10
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: (CONTINUED)
RETAINED EARNINGS--Retained earnings represent the cumulative net
income/(loss) resulting from non-member business and the difference between
member income as determined for financial reporting purposes and federal income
tax reporting purposes from the years prior to 1996. The non-member net loss was
$396,000, $15,000 and $544,000 in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Subsequent to year-end, American Crystal filed a registration statement with
the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the issuance of up to 21,729
shares.
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET
American Crystal earns patronage dividends from the Banks for Cooperatives
based on American Crystal's share of the net interest income earned by the
banks. These patronage dividends are applied against interest expense.
INCOME TAXES
American Crystal is a non-exempt cooperative for federal income tax
purposes. As such, American Crystal is subject to corporate income taxes on its
net income from non-member sources. The provision for income taxes relates to
the results of operations from non-member business, state income taxes and
certain other permanent differences between financial and income tax reporting.
Deferred income taxes are provided for timing differences between financial and
income tax reporting. The Company has a $962,000 deferred income tax asset
balance attributable to alternative minimum tax credits and non-member net
operating losses, resulting in a $549,000 income tax benefit in the current
year.
Examinations of the Company's federal income tax returns for the years ended
on or before August 31, 1992, were conducted by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) in prior years. Statutory notices of deficiency had been issued by the
IRS, proposing additional income taxes of $5.4 million, plus accrued interest.
Petitions were filed with the Tax Court to contest the proposed increase in
income taxes. During the year ended August 31, 1996, issues involving $4.4
million of proposed taxes were resolved in favor of American Crystal. A tax
payment of $642,000, plus interest of $695,000, was made with respect to issues
conceded by American Crystal. The issues involved with the remaining proposed
deficiency of $440,000 are still awaiting trial in the Tax Court. At this time,
it is not possible to determine the additional taxes and interest, if any, that
may become due upon the resolution of the remaining contested matters. The
eventual resolution of these income tax matters, will not have a material effect
on these financial statements.
Net income tax payments (refunds) for the years ended August 31, 1996, 1995,
and 1994 were $(139,000), $183,000 and $63,000, respectively.
(2) INVENTORIES:
The major components of inventories are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
--------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Refined Sugar, Pulp, Molasses and Beet Seed................................... $ 46,155 $ 78,440
Maintenance Parts and Supplies................................................ 26,522 24,851
--------- ----------
Total Inventories............................................................. $ 72,677 $ 103,291
--------- ----------
--------- ----------
</TABLE>
F-11
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(3) INVESTMENT IN MARKETING COOPERATIVES:
As of January 1, 1994, American Crystal entered into a marketing agreement
with United Sugars Corporation (United), whereby United will market the
cooperative's production of sugar. The amount of the investment is accounted for
using the equity method. American Crystal's investment in United was comprised
of contributed assets with a net book value of $1.7 million and transferred
liabilities of $1.1 million. Upon transfer, certain assets were revalued based
on appraisals that increased the value of those assets by $4.2 million. This
increased value was recorded by United as a capital contribution from American
Crystal. American Crystal has recorded this $4.2 million as a deferred gain, net
of deferred income taxes, and will amortize it over a period of 31 years. The
investment in United is reported net of the unamortized deferred gain. During
1996, American Crystal invested an additional $10.0 million in United. This
investment was associated with the funding of United's current capital projects.
All sugar produced is sold by United as an agent for American Crystal. As of
August 31, 1996, American Crystal has a 71% ownership interest in United,
however, American Crystal has only one-third voting rights. The amount of sales
and related costs to be recognized by each owner is allocated based on their pro
rata share of production for the year. The owners provide United with cash
advances on an ongoing basis for operating and marketing expenses incurred by
United. During the year ended August 31, 1996 and 1995, American Crystal
advanced United $66.8 million and $59.5 million, respectively. American Crystal
had net advances to United of $7.1 million and $6.6 million as of August 31,
1996 and 1995, respectively. American Crystal provides administrative services
for United and is reimbursed for costs incurred. American Crystal was reimbursed
$708,000and $655,000 for services provided during 1996 amd 1995, respectively.
American Crystal has a one-third ownership interest in Midwest
Agri-Commodities Company (Midwest). The amount of the investment is accounted
for using the equity method. All beet pulp and molasses produced is sold by
Midwest as an agent for American Crystal. The amount of sales and related costs
to be recognized by each owner is allocated based on their pro-rata share of
production for the year. The owners provide Midwest with cash advances on an
ongoing basis for operating and marketing expenses incurred by Midwest. American
Crystal advanced Midwest $41.2 million, and $34.4 million, during the years
ended August 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively. American Crystal had outstanding
advances to Midwest of $3.2 million, and ($545,000) as of August 31, 1996, and
1995, respectively. The owners are guarantors of the short-term line of credit
Midwest has with the St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives (Bank). As of August 31,
1996 Midwest had outstanding short-term debt with the Bank of $1.7 million, of
which $1.4 million was guaranteed by American Crystal.
(4) PROGOLD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
American Crystal has a 46% ownership interest in ProGold Limited Liability
Company. ProGold Limited Liability Company was formed to construct and operate a
corn wet milling plant, which intends to produce high-fructose corn syrup
sweetener. Construction of the plant began in May, 1995, with the anticipated
start-up set for the Fall of 1996. Following is summary financial information
for ProGold Limited Liability Company.
F-12
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(4) PROGOLD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (CONTINUED)
SUMMARY INFORMATION (IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Current Assets......................................................... $ 1,222 $ 12,608
Fixed Assets........................................................... 194,916 36,090
Other Assets........................................................... 5,026 388
---------- ---------
Total Assets....................................................... $ 201,164 $ 49,086
---------- ---------
---------- ---------
Current Liabilities.................................................... $ 24,268 $ 11,050
Long-Term Liabilities.................................................. 71,962 --
---------- ---------
Total Liabilities.................................................. 96,230 11,050
Equity................................................................. 104,934 38,036
---------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Equity........................................... $ 201,164 $ 49,086
---------- ---------
---------- ---------
Sales Revenue.......................................................... $ -- $ --
Cost of Sales.......................................................... -- --
---------- ---------
Gross Margins.......................................................... -- --
Other Income........................................................... 482 381
Expenses............................................................... (1,228) (1,099)
---------- ---------
Net (Loss)............................................................. $ (746) $ (718)
---------- ---------
---------- ---------
</TABLE>
(5) LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM DEBT:
The long-term debt outstanding as of August 31, 1996 and 1995, is summarized
below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Term Loans from the St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives, Due in Varying Amounts
Through 2008, Interest at 6.07% to 9.2%, with First Lien on Substantially all
Property and Equipment........................................................ $ 168,800 $ 94,900
Term Loans from the First Bank, Minneapolis, Due in Equal Amounts Through 2002,
Interest at 7.60% to 8.25%, unsecured......................................... 6,000 7,000
Term Loan from the Bank of North Dakota Due in Equal Amounts Through 2009, with
Interest at 6.34%, unsecured.................................................. 10,400 11,200
Pollution Control and Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Due in Varying
Amounts Through 2018, Interest at 6.00% to 8.00%.............................. 5,719 5,929
---------- ----------
190,919 119,029
Less Current Maturities....................................................... (13,525) (12,115)
---------- ----------
Total Long-Term Debt........................................................ $ 177,394 $ 106,914
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(5) LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM DEBT: (CONTINUED)
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997...................................................... $ 13,525
1998...................................................... 14,300
1999...................................................... 14,300
2000...................................................... 14,415
2001...................................................... 14,425
Thereafter................................................ 119,954
---------
Total................................................. $ 190,919
---------
---------
</TABLE>
There is no unused term loan line of credit with the St. Paul Bank for
Cooperatives.
During the year ended August 31, 1996, American Crystal borrowed from the
St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives, the Commodity Credit Corporation and issued
commercial paper to meet its short-term borrowing requirements. American Crystal
had outstanding short-term debt with the St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives of $5
million and with the Commodity Credit Corporation of $8.6 million as of August
31, 1996. During the year ended August 31, 1996, American Crystal had available
short-term lines of credit totaling $220 million.
Maximum borrowings, average borrowing levels and average interest rates for
short-term debt for the years ended August 31, 1996 and 1995, follow:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---------- ----------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT
INTEREST RATES)
<S> <C> <C>
Maximum Borrowings........................................ $ 190,798 $ 189,200
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
Average Borrowing Levels.................................. $ 118,481 $ 101,500
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
Average Interest Rates.................................... 5.77% 6.8%
</TABLE>
The terms of the loan agreements with the St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives
contain certain covenants related to, among other matters, the: level of working
capital; ratio of term liabilities to members' investments; ratio of short-term
debt balances to working capital; level of term debt to net funds generated; and
investment in bank stock in amounts prescribed by the bank. As of August 31,
1996, American Crystal was in compliance with the terms of the loan agreements,
or had obtained applicable waivers.
Interest paid was $16.1 million, $16.8 million and $10.3 million for the
years ended August 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 respectively. Interest capitalized
was $3.8 million, $1.5 million and $1.4 million for the years ended August 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
(6) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The fair value of financial instruments is generally defined as the amount
at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between
willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation sale. Quoted market prices
are generally not available for the Company's financial instruments.
Accordingly, fair values are based on judgments regarding anticipated cash
flows, future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk
characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These
estimates involve uncertainties and matters of judgment, and, therefore, cannot
be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect
the estimates.
F-14
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(6) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: (CONTINUED)
The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of
August 31, 1996 and 1995, are as follows:
LONG-TERM DEBT--Based upon current borrowing rates with similar maturities,
the fair value of the long-term debt approximates the carrying value.
INVESTMENTS IN BANKS FOR COOPERATIVES, INVESTMENTS IN MARKETING
COOPERATIVES, AND INVESTMENT IN PROGOLD LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY--American
Crystal believes it is not practical to estimate the fair value of these
investments without incurring excessive costs because there is no established
market for these securities and it is inappropriate to estimate future cash
flows which are largely dependent on future earnings of these organizations.
(7) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
COMPANY-SPONSORED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
Substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements of age and
length of service are covered by a Company-sponsored retirement plan. Plan A
(nonunion employees) and Plan B (union employees) are defined benefit,
noncontributory plans. The plans provide for vesting after 5 years of service
with benefits for early retirement, normal retirement and disability or death.
The assets of the plans are held by an insurance company. American Crystal's
funding policy for Plan A is to contribute the normal cost of the plan
determined under the entry age normal actuarial cost method, plus amounts
necessary to amortize changes over 30 years. The funding policy for Plan B is to
contribute the minimum required amount determined under the frozen initial
liability actuarial cost method. The actuarial assumptions are shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
----- ----- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Discount Rate...................................................................... 7.5% 7.5% 8.25%
Compensation Rate Increase (Plan A Only)........................................... 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Rate of Return..................................................................... 9.0% 9.0% 9.0%
</TABLE>
During 1995, the Company adopted a non-qualified Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan for a select group of management and employees. The plan is
unfunded and provides for vesting after 5 years of service with benefits for
early retirement, normal retirement and disability or death.
F-15
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(7) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS: (CONTINUED)
The plans' status as of August 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, is shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Normal Service Cost.................................................. $ 1,366 $ 1,281 $ 1,071
Interest Cost on Projected Benefit Obligation........................ 3,718 3,388 3,050
Return on Plan Assets................................................ (7,414) (3,458) (1,456)
Multiple Employer Adjustment......................................... (17) (21) --
Net Amortization (Deferral).......................................... 4,739 511 (1,674)
---------- ---------- ---------
Net Pension Expense.................................................. $ 2,392 $ 1,701 $ 991
---------- ---------- ---------
---------- ---------- ---------
Actuarial Present Value of Benefit Obligations:
Estimated Present Value of Vested Benefits......................... $ 44,933 $ 41,855 $ 30,055
Estimated Present Value of Non-Vested Benefits..................... 3,368 2,901 3,963
---------- ---------- ---------
Accumulated Benefit Obligation....................................... 48,301 44,756 34,018
Value of Future Pay Increases........................................ 7,239 6,086 4,108
---------- ---------- ---------
Projected Benefit Obligation......................................... 55,540 50,842 38,126
Estimated Market Value of Plan Assets................................ 43,853 37,385 34,453
---------- ---------- ---------
Projected Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets................ 11,687 13,457 3,673
Unrecognized Net Costs............................................... (14,407) (17,262) (8,004)
Unrecognized Net Assets.............................................. 2,049 2,345 2,604
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment................................. 6,872 9,043 2,858
---------- ---------- ---------
Net Pension Liability................................................ $ 6,201 $ 7,583 $ 1,131
---------- ---------- ---------
---------- ---------- ---------
</TABLE>
As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87,
"Employers' Accounting for Pensions," American Crystal has recognized, as of
August 31, 1996, a minimum pension liability of $6.9 million, an intangible
pension asset of $2.4 million and a direct equity reduction of $4.5 million.
POSTRETIREMENT AND POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
During 1994, American Crystal adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than
Pensions" and Financial Accounting Standards No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for
Postemployment Benefits." The standards changed the method of accounting for the
postretirement and postemployment benefits from a cash basis to the accrual
basis. The result of these changes in accounting principle resulted in a
reduction of net proceeds resulting from member and non-member business of $13.3
million in 1994. Prior fiscal years were not restated and the cumulative effect
of the change on periods prior to the year ended August 31, 1994, totaling $12.2
million was charged, net of tax, against 1994 net proceeds resulting from member
and non-member business. The change had no effect on the growers' 1994, 1995 or
1996 net beet payments.
American Crystal Sugar Company has a medical plan and a Medicare supplement
plan which are available to substantially all American Crystal retirees.
American Crystal also has a medical plan that covers disabled employees who have
not attained retirement age. The cost of this program is paid by the company.
F-16
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(7) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS: (CONTINUED)
The rates used in determining the actuarial present value of the accumulated
other postretirement and postemployment benefit (OPEB) obligations are in the
following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Discount Rate................................................ 7.5% 7.5% 8.0%
Increase in Future Health Cost............................... 9.75% 10.5% 11.25%
Health Care Trend Rate....................................... 5.5% 5.5% 6.0%
</TABLE>
The components of accumulated OPEB obligations and the periodic OPEB cost
are set forth in the following table. If the health care cost trend rate was
increased by one percentage point for each year, OPEB expense would have
increased approximately $271,000 in 1996, and the actuarial present value of
accumulated OPEB obligations at August 31, 1996, would have increased
approximately $1.9 million.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial Present Value of Accumulated OPEB Obligations
Retiree Benefits..................................................... $ 3,552 $ 3,261 $ 3,509
Other Fully Eligible Active Plan Participants........................ 2,295 1,934 1,961
Other Active Plan Participants....................................... 7,186 5,292 5,579
--------- --------- ---------
Present Value of Accumulated OPEB Obligations.......................... 13,033 10,487 11,049
Unrecognized Net Gain from Experience Different from Actuarial
Assumptions........................................................ 1,255 2,627 1,202
--------- --------- ---------
Total Accrued OPEB Obligation........................................ 14,288 13,114 12,251
Less Current Portion................................................. 831 397 437
--------- --------- ---------
Non-Current Accrued OPEB Obligation................................ $ 13,457 $ 12,717 $ 11,814
--------- --------- ---------
Net Periodic OPEB Cost:
Service Cost......................................................... $ 903 $ 770 $ 245
Interest Cost........................................................ 742 802 800
Amortization......................................................... (100) (11) --
Transition Obligation................................................ -- -- 12,214
--------- --------- ---------
Net Periodic OPEB Cost................................................. $ 1,545 $ 1,561 $ 13,259
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
The Long-Term Incentive Plan provides deferred compensation to certain key
executives of American Crystal Sugar Company effective September 1, 1995. The
Plan creates financial incentives that are based upon contract rights which are
available to the executive under the terms of the Plan, the value of which is
related to the value of preferred shares of the Company. As of August 31, 1996,
there were 234 rights issued, of which 50% were vested.
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS
American Crystal also has qualified 401(k) plans for all eligible employees.
The plans provide for immediate vesting of benefits. Participants contribute a
percentage of their gross earnings each pay period as provided in the
participation agreement. The Company matches the nonunion and union
participants' contribution up to 4% and 1% respectively, of their gross
earnings. The company's contributions to this
F-17
<PAGE>
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(7) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS: (CONTINUED)
plan were $936,000, $887,000 and $580,000 for the years ended August 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively.
(8) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
American Crystal had outstanding letters of credit totaling $3.9 million as
of August 31, 1996.
American Crystal is subject to various lawsuits and claims that arise in the
ordinary course of its business. Management believes the disposition of all such
proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, should not have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial condition.
American Crystal is subject to extensive federal and state environmental
laws and regulations with respect to water pollution, discharge permits, air
pollution, noise pollution and solid waste disposal. American Crystal conducts
an ongoing pollution control program designed to meet these environmental laws
and regulations.
During 1995, the United Sugars' board of directors authorized the
construction of a sugar storage facility at the Crookston factory at a total
estimated cost of approximately $6.5 million. American Crystal is responsible
for the construction of this asset and all costs incurred are reimbursed by
United Sugars. As of August 31, 1996, costs incurred related to the sugar
storage facility were $4.4 million. The company was also committed to an
additional $1.0 million for the sugar storage facility.
American Crystal has outstanding commitments totaling $8.7 million as of
August 31, 1996, for consulting services, equipment and construction contracts
related to various capital projects.
F-18
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors of the Company consists of three directors from each
of the five factory districts. Directors must be common shareholders or
representatives of common shareholders belonging to the district they represent
and are elected by the members of that district. In the case of a common
shareholder who is other than a natural person, a duly appointed or elected
representative of such common shareholder may serve as a director. The directors
have been elected to serve terms expiring in December of the years indicated in
the table below. One director is elected each year from each factory district.
The table below lists the current directors and directors-elect of the
Company. Brief biographies for each of the directors and directors-elect are
included after the table.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF DIRECTOR TERM EXPIRES
NAME AND ADDRESS BIRTH FACTORY DISTRICT SINCE IN DEC.
- ----------------------------------------------- ------------ -------------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Michael Astrup ................................ 1953 Moorhead 1996 1999(1)
P.O. Box 219
Dilworth, MN 56529
Jerry Bitker .................................. 1948 Hillsboro 1996 1999(2)
R.R. 1, Box 106
Halstad, MN 56548
Paul Borgen ................................... 1947 Moorhead 1985 1997
R.R. 1, Box 43
Georgetown, MN 56546
Thomas Bryl ................................... 1947 Hillsboro 1993 1996(3)
P.O. Box 171
Hillsboro, ND 58045-0171
Aime J. Dufault ............................... 1954 East Grand Forks 1990 1997
R.R. 1, Box 162
Argyle, MN 56713
Steven M. Goodwin ............................. 1958 East Grand Forks 1995 1998
R.R. 3, Box 116
Angus, MN 56712
Court G. Hanson ............................... 1948 Hillsboro 1993 1998
R.R. 2, Box 1
Blanchard, ND 58009
Lonn M. Keil .................................. 1953 Crookston 1994 1997
R.R. 3, Box 71
Crookston, MN 56716
</TABLE>
19
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF DIRECTOR TERM EXPIRES
NAME AND ADDRESS BIRTH FACTORY DISTRICT SINCE IN DEC.
- ----------------------------------------------- ------------ -------------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
David J. Kragnes .............................. 1952 Moorhead 1995 1998
R.R. 1, Box 100
Felton, MN 56536
Francis Kritzberger ........................... 1945 Hillsboro 1996 1997(4)
R.R. 1, Box 22
Hillsboro, MN 58045
Wayne Langen .................................. 1939 Drayton 1988 1997
P.O. Box 133
Kennedy, MN 56733
Duane Lien .................................... 1931 Crookston 1984 1996(5)
R.R. 1, Box 57
Crookston, MN 56716
Patrick D. Mahar .............................. 1942 Drayton 1993 1999
R.R. 1, Box 363
Cavalier, ND 58220-9789
Barry W. Malme ................................ 1947 Crookston 1986 1998
R.R. 1, Box 19K
Shelly, MN 56581
Robert Nyquist, Chairman ...................... 1933 Moorhead 1984 1996(6)
R.R. 2, Box 176
Moorhead, MN 56560
Ronald Reitmeier .............................. 1945 Crookston 1996 1999(7)
R.R. 1, Box 49
Fisher, MN 56723
G. Terry Stadstad ............................. 1943 East Grand Forks 1993 1999
R.R. 2, Box 98
Grand Forks, ND 58203-9644
Robert Vivatson ............................... 1949 Drayton 1992 1998
P.O. Box 63
Cavalier, ND 58220
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) At the Company's Factory District Meeting for the Moorhead district held in
November 1996, Mr. Astrup was elected to a three-year term as a director of
the Company to assume the seat now held by Robert Nyquist. Mr. Astrup's term
begins in December 1996 and expires in December 1999.
(2) At the Company's Factory District Meeting for the Hillsboro district held in
November 1996, Mr. Bitker was elected to a three-year term as a director of
the Company to assume the seat now held by Mr. Thomas Bryl. Mr. Bitker's
term begins in December 1996 and expires in December 1999.
(3) Mr. Bryl's term as a director of the Company from the Hillsboro district
expires in December 1996. Mr. Bryl will be replaced by Mr. Jerry Bitker.
(4) At the Company's Factory District Meeting for the Hillsboro district held in
November 1996, Mr. Kritzberger was elected as a director of the Company to
fill the vacancy caused by the resignation from the Board in September 1996
of Mr. Michael Warner. Mr. Kritzberger will serve for a term expiring in
December 1997.
20
<PAGE>
(5) Mr. Lien's term as a director of the Company from the Crookston district
expires in December 1996. Mr Lien was not eligible to stand for re-election
due to those provisions of the Company's By-laws which prohibit any person
from serving more than four (4) consecutive terms as a director. Mr. Lien
will be replaced by Mr. Ronald Reitmeier.
(6) Mr. Nyquist's term as a director of the Company from the Moorhead district
expires in December 1996. Mr Nyquist was not eligible to stand for
re-election due to those provisions of the Company's By-laws which prohibit
any person from serving more than four (4) consecutive terms as a director.
Mr. Nyquist will be replaced by Mr. Michael Astrup.
(7) At the Company's Factory District Meeting for the Crookston district held in
November 1996, Mr. Reitmeier was elected to a three-year term as a director
of the Company to assume the seat now held by Mr. Duane Lien. Mr.
Reitmeier's term begins in December 1996 and expires in December 1999.
MICHAEL ASTRUP. Mr. Astrup is a director-elect, elected to assume the seat
now held by Mr. Robert Nyquist. Mr. Astrup's three-year term of office will
begin in December 1996 and expire in December 1999. Mr. Astrup has been a farmer
since 1976, and currently farms near Moorhead. Mr. Astrup is the President of
Astrup Farms Inc.
JERRY BITKER. Mr. Bitker is a director-elect, elected to assume the seat
now held by Mr. Thomas Bryl. Mr. Bitker's three-year term of office will begin
in December 1996 and expire in December 1999. Mr. Bitker has been a farmer since
1974, and currently farms near Ada and Halstad, Minnesota.
PAUL BORGEN. Mr. Borgen has been a director since 1985 and has been a
farmer since 1968. Mr. Borgen's operations are near Georgetown, Minnesota and
Mr. Borgen serves as President of Paul Borgen Farms, Inc. Mr. Borgen serves on
the Boards of Directors of American Bank, Moorhead, Minnesota, United Sugars
Corporation and American Sugar Beet Growers Association, Washington, D.C.
THOMAS BRYL. Mr. Bryl has been a director since 1993 and a farmer since
1973. Mr. Bryl is president of T.M. Bryl, Inc. and operates its farming
operations near Hillsboro, North Dakota.
AIME J. DUFAULT. Mr. Dufault has been a director since 1990. He has farmed
near Argyle, Minnesota since 1974.
STEVEN M. GOODWIN. Mr. Goodwin has been a director since 1995. Mr. Goodwin
has been a farmer since 1980 and owns and operates a farm near Angus, Minnesota.
COURT G. HANSON. Mr. Hanson has been a director since 1993 and has been a
farmer since 1971. Mr. Hanson is president of C. Hanson Farm, Inc., operating
near Blanchard, North Dakota. Prior to farming, Mr. Hanson was an assistant
national bank examiner from 1970 to 1973.
LONN M. KIEL. Mr. Kiel has been a director since 1994 and has been farming
near Crookston, Minnesota since 1982. He is the President of Kiel Corporation
and also serves on the Board of Directors of the Crookston Fuel Company.
FRANCIS KRITZBERGER. Mr. Kritzberger was elected in November, 1996 to
assume the seat vacated by the resignation of Mr. Michael Warner in September
1996. Mr. Kritzberger's term of office will expire in December 1997. Mr.
Kritzberger has been a farmer since 1974 and farms near Hillsboro. He served on
the Company's Board of Directors between 1989 and 1993. He currently serves on
the Board of Directors of Norwest Bank in Hillsboro and on the Board of
Bloomfield Township, North Dakota.
DAVID J. KRAGNES. Mr. Kragnes has been a director since 1995. Mr. Kragnes
has been a farmer since 1972, with his farming operation located near Felton,
Minnesota.
21
<PAGE>
WAYNE LANGEN. Mr. Langen has been a director since 1988 and a farmer since
1963. Mr. Langen is a partner of Langen Bros. Joint Venture and operates its
farming operations near Kennedy, Minnesota. Mr. Langen serves on the board of
directors of Kennedy Farmers Elevator Company, United Sugars Corporation and
Midwest Agri-Commodities Company.
DUANE LIEN. Mr. Lien has been a director since 1984 and has been a farmer
since 1949. As a stockholder of Double D Inc., Mr. Lien operates near Crookston,
Minnesota. Mr. Lien serves on the Board of Directors of Midwest Agri-Commodities
Company.
PATRICK D. MAHAR. Mr. Mahar has been a director since 1993 and has been a
farmer since 1962. He is currently a partner of Mahar Farms near Cavalier, North
Dakota. Mr. Mahar previously served as president of the Red River Valley
Sugarbeet Growers Association, Fargo, North Dakota and as president of the
American Sugarbeet Growers Association, Washington, D.C. Mr. Mahar is currently
serving on the boards of directors of First State Bank and Farmers Coop
Elevator, both of Cavalier, North Dakota.
BARRY W. MALME. Mr. Malme has been a director since 1986. Mr. Malme has
been a farmer near Crookston, Minnesota since 1974. Mr. Malme is a director of
Midwest Agri-Commodities Company.
ROBERT NYQUIST. Mr. Nyquist has been a director since 1984 and is currently
chairman of the Company's board of directors. Mr. Nyquist has been a farmer
since 1952 and currently owns and operates Robert Nyquist Farms near Moorhead,
Minnesota. Mr. Nyquist serves on the boards of directors of United Sugars
Corporation and Midwest Agri-Commodities Company and on the board of governors
of ProGold Limited Liability Company.
RONALD REITMEIER. Mr. Reitmeier is a director-elect, elected to assume the
seat now held by Mr. Duane Lien. Mr. Reitmeier's three-year term of office will
begin in December 1996 and expire in December 1999. Mr. Reitmeier has been a
farmer since 1968, and currently farms near Crookston.
G. TERRY STADSTAD. Mr. Stadstad has been a director since 1993 and has been
farming near Grand Forks, North Dakota since 1965. Mr. Stadstad serves on the
Board of Directors of United Sugars Corporation.
ROBERT VIVATSON. Mr. Vivatson has been a director since 1992. Operating as
a farmer near Cavalier, North Dakota, since 1975, Mr. Vivatson is a partner of
Vivatson Bros. and president of Vivatson Farms Inc. Mr. Vivatson is serving on
the boards of directors of First State Bank, Cavalier, North Dakota and on the
Board of Governors of ProGold Limited Liability Company.
The Board of Directors meets monthly. The Company provides its directors
with minimal compensation, consisting of (i) a payment of $200 per month, (ii) a
per diem payment of $200 for each day spent on Company activities, including
board meetings and other Company functions, and (iii) reimbursement of expenses
for attendance at Board of Directors' meetings. The Chairman of the Board of
Directors receives a payment of $500 per month, rather than $200 per month; the
Chairman also receives a per diem in the amount of $200 for each day spent on
Company activities.
22
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The table below lists the principal officers of the Company, none of whom
owns any common or preferred shares. Officers are elected annually by the Board
of Directors.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF
NAME BIRTH POSITION
- ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Daniel J. McCarty................... 1952 Chief Executive Officer
Marcus F. Richardson................ 1941 Chief Operating Officer
Robert W. Levos..................... 1943 Vice President--Agriculture
James J. Horvath.................... 1945 Chief Financial Officer
Lawrence L. Mathias................. 1941 Vice President--Human Resources and Public Relations
David A. Berg....................... 1954 Vice President--Strategic Planning
James Dudley........................ 1950 Vice President--Operations
Ralph K. Morris..................... 1940 Secretary
Samuel S.M. Wai..................... 1953 Corporate Controller, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Mark L. Lembke...................... 1955 Corporate Accounting Manager, Assistant Secretary and Assistant
Treasurer
Daniel C. Mott...................... 1959 Assistant Secretary
Joseph J. Talley.................... 1960 Treasurer
Brian F. Ingulsrud.................. 1962 Financial Planning Manager, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary
Ronald K. Peterson.................. 1955 Financial Systems Manager, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary
</TABLE>
DANIEL J. MCCARTY. Mr. McCarty was named Chief Executive Officer in April,
1996. Mr. McCarty has over fifteen years of experience in managing major
agricultural businesses. From 1992 through 1995, he was with Pet, Inc. as Group
Vice-President and President of the William Underwood subsidiary. He was
previously with Del Monte Foods for over ten years, where he was Director of the
flagship Del Monte Vegetable brand. Mr. McCarty serves on several Boards of
Directors, including United Sugars, Midwest Agri-Commodities Company, the Sugar
Association, Inc. and the U.S. Beet Sugar Association.
MARCUS F. RICHARDSON. Mr. Richardson has been Chief Operating Officer since
1995. Mr. Richardson has served in various manufacturing positions with the
Company since 1980 including, from 1986 to 1995, Vice President--Operations. Mr.
Richardson currently serves as a director of the Beet Sugar Development
Foundation, a non-profit industry association, and on the Board of Governors of
ProGold Limited Liability Company. Mr. Richardson also serves on the Board of
Directors of the Moorhead Economic Development Authority.
ROBERT W. LEVOS. Mr. Levos as been Vice President--Agriculture since 1986.
From 1981 to 1986 he was General Agriculturalist. He has been employed by the
Company since 1965. Mr. Levos currently serves on the boards of directors of
West Coast Beet Seed Company and the Beet Sugar Development Foundation.
23
<PAGE>
JAMES J. HORVATH. Mr. Horvath was named Chief Financial Officer in March,
1996. From June, 1994 to March, 1996, Mr. Horvath served as the Company's Vice
President--Joint Ventures as well as Chief Manager and Chief Operating Officer
of ProGold Limited Liability Company. Mr. Horvath also served as the Company's
Vice President--Finance from 1985-1994.
LAWRENCE L. MATHIAS. Mr. Mathias has been Vice President--Human Resources
and Public Relations since 1990. He was Industrial Relations Manager with the
Company from 1976 to 1990. He currently serves on the board of directors of Blue
Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota.
DAVID A. BERG. Mr. Berg was named Vice President--Business Development in
1996. He served as the Company's Vice President--Strategic Planning from 1994 to
1996, Director--Market Information from 1992-1994, Manager of Marketing and
Analysis from 1990 to 1992 and Manager--Economic Research from 1987 to 1990. He
currently serves on the Regulatory Task Force of the U.S. Beet Sugar Association
and the Domestic Sugar Committee of the New York Coffee, Sugar and Cocoa
Exchange.
JAMES DUDLEY. Mr. Dudley has been Vice President--Operations since 1995.
From 1993 until August of 1995, Mr. Dudley served as Regional Manager and then
as Factory Operations Manager. Mr. Dudley served as Operations Manager at the
Company's Crookston factory from 1985 through 1993.
RALPH K. MORRIS. Mr. Morris has been Secretary of the Company since 1995.
He is a shareholder and the Chief Executive Officer of the law firm of Doherty,
Rumble & Butler Professional Association. The firm acts as corporate counsel to
American Crystal. Mr. Morris is not an employee of the Company.
SAMUEL S.M. WAI. Mr. Wai was named Corporate Controller, Assistant
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary in November 1996. Mr. Wai was Treasurer from
1985 to November, 1996 and held various financial positions with the Company
from 1979 to 1985. Mr. Wai also serves as Treasurer to the American Crystal
Sugar Political Action Committee.
JOSEPH J. TALLEY. Mr. Talley was named Treasurer in November, 1996. From
March, 1996 to November, 1996, Mr. Talley served as Finance Director, Assistant
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary. From July 1994 to March 1996, Mr. Talley
served as Finance Director of ProGold Limited Liability Company. He currently
serves as Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of ProGold Limited Liability Company
as well as Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Golden Growers
Cooperative. Prior to July 1994, Mr. Talley was a partner with the accounting
firm of Eide Helmeke PLLP.
MARK L. LEMBKE. Mr. Lembke was named Corporate Accounting Manager,
Assistant Secretary and Assistant Treasurer in March 1996. Mr. Lembke also
served as the company's Corporate Accounting Manager since August 1995. From
July 1987 through July 1995, Mr. Lembke served as Factory Accounting Supervisor.
BRIAN F. INGULSRUD. Mr. Ingulsrud was named Financial Planning Manager,
Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary in November, 1996. Mr. Ingulsrud has
held various financial positions with the Company since joining the Company in
1990.
RONALD K. PETERSON. Mr. Peterson was named Financial Systems Manager,
Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary in November, 1996. Mr. Peterson has
held various financial positions with the Company since joining the Company in
1979.
DANIEL C. MOTT. Mr. Mott has been Assistant Secretary of the Company since
1995. He is a shareholder in the law firm of Doherty, Rumble & Butler
Professional Association. The firm acts as corporate counsel to American
Crystal. Mr. Mott is not an employee of the Company.
24
<PAGE>
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes the amount of compensation paid for services
rendered to the Company during the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996 and the two
prior fiscal years to those persons serving as the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and to the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the
Company whose cash compensation exceeded $100,000 per annum.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION
------------------------------------------------------
OTHER ANNUAL
COMPENSATION
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY ($) BONUS ($) ($)(1)
- -------------------------------------------------- ----- ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Daniel J. McCarty (2)............................. 1996 $ 149,808 $ 70,000 $ 77,372
Chief Executive Officer
Joseph P. Famalette (3)........................... 1996 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Chief Executive Officer 1995 $ 296,966 $ 0 $ 48,904
1994 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 34,001
Marcus F. Richardson (5).......................... 1996 $ 245,000 $ 93,683 $ 60,550
Chief Operating Officer 1995 $ 268,000 $ 81,104 $ 31,220
1994 $ 190,700 $ 76,286 $ 13,767
James J. Horvath.................................. 1996 $ 205,330 $ 71,866 $ 27,646
Chief Financial Officer 1995 $ 175,000 $ 61,250 $ 17,603
1994 $ 147,552 $ 52,500 $ 18,511
Robert W. Levos................................... 1996 $ 178,490 $ 62,472 $ 37,222
Vice President--Agriculture 1995 $ 163,750 $ 57,313 $ 19,192
1994 $ 155,948 $ 46,785 $ 7,683
Lawrence L. Mathias............................... 1996 $ 162,840 $ 56,994 $ 31,121
Vice President--Human 1995 $ 148,710 $ 52,049 $ 20,084
Resources and Public Relations 1994 $ 131,600 $ 52,640 $ 12,366
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM COMPENSATION AWARDS PAYOUTS
---------------------------------------------------------
RESTRICTED ALL OTHER
STOCK OPTIONS/ LTIP PAYOUTS COMPENSATION
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION AWARD(S) ($) SARS (#) ($) ($)
- -------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Daniel J. McCarty (2).............................
Chief Executive Officer
Joseph P. Famalette (3)........................... $ 159,510(4)
Chief Executive Officer $ 83,333(4)
$ 83,333(4)
Marcus F. Richardson (5)..........................
Chief Operating Officer
James J. Horvath..................................
Chief Financial Officer
Robert W. Levos...................................
Vice President--Agriculture
Lawrence L. Mathias...............................
Vice President--Human
Resources and Public Relations
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
(1) Includes the cost of additional life insurance coverage, use of a company
car, costs of tax return preparation, imputed interest, taxable moving
expenses reimbursed, the Company's matching contribution for 401(k) and SERP
and pension valuations.
(2) Mr. McCarty's employment with the Company began on March 28, 1996.
Calculated on an annualized basis, Mr. McCarty's salary for the fiscal year
ending on August 31, 1996 was $410,000.
(3) Mr. Famalette's employment with the Company ended on May 31, 1995.
(4) Represents forgiveness of installment payments due under loans from the
Company to Mr. Famalette. The loan arrangements and related agreements are
described below.
(5) Mr. Richardson also served as interim Chief Executive Officer between June
1995 and March 1996.
Effective April 8, 1996, the Company and Mr. McCarty entered into an
"Employment Agreement" regarding Mr. McCarty's employment by the Company. The
agreement provides that such employment is for an initial term of three years,
after which Mr. McCarty shall serve as an "at will" employee at the pleasure of
the Board of Directors. Among other terms, the agreement establishes Mr.
McCarty's base compensation at $410,000 per year, and also provides that he may
participate in other benefit plans offered by the Company. Pursuant to the
agreement, Mr. McCarty was paid a signing bonus by the Company of $70,000 (less
applicable deductions), in lieu of participation in the Company's annual
management incentive plan through August 31, 1996. If during the initial term
the Board of Directors terminates Mr. McCarty's employment with the Company
without cause, Mr. McCarty is entitled to receive a severance payment equal to
$7,884.62 times the number of weeks between the date of termination and April 7,
1999.
During Mr. Famalette's tenure with the Company, the Company entered into
certain contractual arrangements with Mr. Famalette regarding his employment by
the Company. Although the agreements
25
<PAGE>
specifically indicate that Mr. Famalette is an employee at will, they were
intended to govern both (i) Mr. Famalette's bonuses during the period prior to
1996 and (ii) severance payments due Mr. Famalette should his employment with
the Company be terminated.
Effective March 2, 1992, the Company and Mr. Famalette entered into a
"Compensation, Loan and Severance Agreement". Among other terms, that agreement
established Mr. Famalette's initial compensation at $250,000 per year. The
agreement also provided for a loan of $250,000 to Mr. Famalette. Evidenced by a
promissory note, the loan was to be repaid in three equal installments of
$83,333.33. The first such installment was due on March 2, 1993, the next
installment was due on March 2, 1994 and the final installment became due on
March 2, 1995. However, the "Compensation, Loan and Severance Agreement"
provides that for each full year in which Mr. Famalette remained employed as the
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the sum of $83,333.33 due
under the note would be forgiven. As a result, on March 2, 1993, March 2, 1994,
and March 2, 1995 the Company forgave the installment payments due under the
promissory note. The "Compensation, Loan and Severance Agreement" specified that
the loan and any amounts forgiven under the terms of the agreement were provided
to Mr. Famalette in lieu of any other severance benefits to be paid upon
termination of Mr. Famalette's employment with the Company.
Effective October 1, 1993, the Company entered into a Compensation and Loan
Agreement with Mr. Famalette. The agreement governed Mr. Famalette's
compensation as of Mr. Famalette's employment by the Company. The Compensation
and Loan Agreement stated that Mr. Famalette's annual base compensation during
the period was to be $250,000, unless adjusted by the Board of Directors of the
Company. Effective October 1, 1994, Mr. Famalette's annual base compensation was
established as $359,500. The agreement further provided that Mr. Famalette was
not eligible for any executive incentive compensation or bonuses, but would
receive the loan described in this paragraph. Instead of participating in the
executive incentive program described below, Mr. Famalette received a loan in
the amount of $420,000. The loan bore no interest and was due in full on January
2, 1997; provided, that the loan was to be forgiven on January 2, 1997 if Mr.
Famalette remained in the employ of the Company through September 30, 1996. Upon
Mr. Famalette's departure from the Company, an Amendment to the Compensation and
Loan Agreement was mutually agreed upon providing that $140,000 of the loan
would be forgiven at such time as Mr. Famalette repaid the other $280,000 of the
loan. Mr. Famalette has since repaid the whole $280,000.
On March 11, 1994, a loan was made to Mr. Famalette. The amount of the loan
was $420,000 and bore interest at a rate of 4% per annum. Mr. Famalette repaid
the loan in full on August 29, 1994.
Certain management employees are entitled to participate in an incentive
program that provides for cash awards based partially on the performance of the
Company and partially on achievement of certain management performance
objectives. Those performance objectives are determined by the Board of
Directors. An executive is not eligible for any awards under the incentive
program unless that executive's performance for the applicable fiscal year is
rated as "fully satisfactory" or better. Depending on the executive's
responsibilities, the performance of the Company (measured in terms of percent
of sugar revenues returned to the members) and the results of the executive's
evaluation for the fiscal year, the program provides for an incentive bonus in
amounts ranging from 4% to 40% of the eligible executive's base salary.
The Company has also adopted a Long Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") which
provides deferred compensation to certain key executives of American Crystal
effective September 1, 1995. The LTIP creates financial incentives that reward
executives for long-term commitment to the Company and for successfully
implementing the Company's long-term growth strategies. Such incentives are
based upon contract rights which are available to the executive under the terms
of the LTIP, the value of which is related to the value of preferred shares of
the Company. The LTIP allows participants to purchase a limited number of
contract rights at the end of each three-year cycle. The LTIP establishes both
minimum and maximum
26
<PAGE>
ownership levels. When an executive reaches his minimum ownership level, he may
sell any vested shares at the time of his termination, disability or death. At
the point of sale, the contract right becomes a share of Preferred Stock which
the Company issues to the purchasing grower. The executive receives the proceeds
of the sale, less appropriate taxes. The long-term cost of the stock will not be
to the Company, but to the grower who eventually purchases the stock from the
executive.
Management employees are also eligible to participate in the Company's
Retirement Plan "A", a 401(k) savings plan and, beginning on September 1, 1994,
a "Supplemental Executive Plan." Those plans are described below.
RETIREMENT PLANS
The Company has established noncontributory, defined benefit retirement
plans which are available to all eligible employees of the Company. Those
employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement participate in
one plan, while employees who are not subject to a collective bargaining
agreement, including the executive officers listed on the Summary Compensation
Table, participate in another pension plan. That plan is known as Retirement
Plan "A". The benefits of the plan are funded by periodic Company contributions
to a retirement trust which invests the Company's contributions and the earnings
from such contributions in order to pay the benefits to the employees. The plan
provides for the payment of monthly retirement benefits determined under a
calculation based on years of service and a participant's compensation.
Retirement benefits are paid to participants upon normal retirement at the age
of 65 or later or upon early retirement. The plan also provides for the payment
of certain disability and death benefits.
The following table reflects the estimated annual benefits payable to a
fully-vested executive officer of the Company under Retirement Plan "A", upon
retirement at age 65, after 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 years of annual service at the
remuneration levels set forth in the table:
American Crystal Sugar Company
1996 Calculation
PLAN A--QUALIFIED BENEFITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS OF SERVICE
------------------------------------------------------------
RENUMERATION 15 20 25 30 35
- ------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$125,000 $ 24,595 $ 32,794 $ 40,993 $ 49,191 $ 49,191
$150,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
$175,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
$200,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
$225,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
$250,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
$300,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
$400,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
$500,000 $ 29,846 $ 39,794 $ 49,743 $ 59,691 $ 59,691
</TABLE>
The five executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table have
years of service under the plan as follows: Mr. McCarty has served for less than
1 year; Mr. Richardson has served for 16 years; Mr. Horvath has served for 12
years; Mr. Levos has served for 31 years; Mr. Mathias has served for 21 years.
The Company maintains a Section 401(k) plan that permits employees to elect
to set aside, on a pre-tax basis, a portion of their gross compensation in trust
to pay future retirement benefits. The Company matches 100% of the employee's
first 4% of compensation. The total annual pre-income tax addition to any
employees account in any calendar year may not exceed the lesser of (i) $30,000
or (ii) 25% of annual
27
<PAGE>
compensation less the amount of the contribution and any salary conversion.
During 1996, the employee pre-income tax contribution was limited to $9,500. An
employee may also contribute up to 10% of his annual compensation on an
after-tax basis. Benefits under the 401(k) plan begin to be paid to the employee
upon the close of the plan year in which one of the following events has
occurred: the date the employee attains age 65, the date the employee terminates
his service with the employer and the date specified in a written election made
by the employee to receive benefits no later than April 1 of the year following
the calendar year in which the employee retires, dies, becomes disabled, reaches
age 70 1/2 or is terminated.
Effective September 1, 1994, certain executive employees of the Company
became eligible to participate in a "Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan".
That plan was adopted by the Company's Board of Directors on June 30, 1994.
Subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors, the plan provides for the
Company to credit to the account of each executive eligible to participate in
the Supplemental Plan amounts equal to (i) the difference between amounts
actually contributed to the Company's 401(k) plan on behalf of the executive and
the amounts which could have been contributed if certain provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code did not prohibit the contribution of such amounts and (ii)
the difference between the benefits actually payable to executive under the
provisions of Retirement Plan "A" and the amounts which would be payable under
Retirement Plan "A" if certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code did not
prohibit the payment of such benefits. In addition, the executive may elect to
defer a portion of his or her compensation, ranging from 2% to 16%, by regular
payroll deductions under the Supplemental Plan, and may also so defer 100% of
all bonus and profits-per-acre payments. The Supplemental Plan is an "unfunded"
plan, with all amounts to be paid under the Supplemental Plan to be paid from
the general assets of the Company when due and also to be subject to the claims
of the Company's creditors.
The following table reflects the estimated annual benefits payable to a
fully-vested executive officer of the Company under the Supplemental Plan, upon
retirement at age 65, after 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 years of annual service at the
remuneration levels set forth in the table:
PLAN A--NON-QUALIFIED BENEFITS 1996 CALCULATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS OF SERVICE
------------------------------------------------------------
RENUMERATION 15 20 25 30 35
- ------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$125,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
$150,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
$175,000 $ 5,250 $ 7,000 $ 8,750 $ 10,500 $ 10,500
$200,000 $ 10,500 $ 14,000 $ 17,500 $ 21,000 $ 21,000
$225,000 $ 15,750 $ 21,000 $ 26,250 $ 31,500 $ 31,500
$250,000 $ 21,000 $ 28,000 $ 35,000 $ 42,000 $ 42,000
$300,000 $ 31,500 $ 42,000 $ 52,500 $ 63,000 $ 63,000
$400,000 $ 52,500 $ 70,000 $ 87,500 $105,000 $105,000
$450,000 $ 63,000 $ 84,000 $105,000 $126,000 $126,000
$500,000 $ 73,500 $ 98,000 $122,500 $147,000 $147,000
</TABLE>
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
As of the date hereof, no director owns beneficially more than 1% of the
Company's issued and outstanding Preferred Stock and the directors, as a group,
beneficially own less than 2% of the Company's issued and outstanding Preferred
Stock. To the best of the Company's knowledge, no other party beneficially owns
more than 1% of the Company's Preferred Stock. Moreover, the offering will not
have any material effect on the amount and percentage of Preferred Stock owned
by each director and all directors as a group.
28
<PAGE>
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Each of the Company's directors is also a sugarbeet farmer and a shareholder
member or representative of a shareholder member of American Crystal. By virtue
of their status as such members of the Company, each director or the member he
represents sells sugarbeets to the Company and receives payments for those
sugarbeets. Such payments for sugarbeets often exceed $60,000. However, such
payments are received by the directors or the entities they represent on exactly
the same basis as payments are received by other members of the Company for the
delivery of their sugarbeets. Except for the sugarbeets sales described in the
preceding sentences, none of the directors or executive officers of the Company
have engaged in any other transactions with the Company involving amounts in
excess of $60,000.
PART IV.
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
None
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The Company was not required to and did not file any reports on Form 8-K
during the three months ended August 31, 1996.
EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
3(i)* Restated Articles of Incorporation of American Crystal Sugar Company.
3(ii)*** Restated Bylaws of American Crystal Sugar Company.
5.1*** Opinion of Doherty, Rumble & Butler Professional Association.
10(f)*** Growers' Contract (5-year Agreement).
10(g)* Growers' Contract (Annual Contract).
10(h)* Coal Supply Agreement between Registrant and Spring Creek Coal Company, dated
August 1, 1986.
10(i)* Coal Transportation Agreement between Registrant and Northern Coal
Transportation Company, dated August 1, 1986.
10(j)* Beet Loading and Hauling Agreement between Registrant and Transystems, Inc.,
dated May 18, 1993.
10(k)* Form of Uniform Member Marketing Agreement between Registrant and United Sugars
Corporation, dated January 1, 1994.
10(l)* Trademark License Agreement between Registrant and United Sugars Corporation,
dated November 1, 1993.
10(m)* Uniform Member Marketing Agreement, Pool Basis between Registrant and Midwest
Agri-Commodities Company, dated April 14, 1992.
10(n)* Stipulation Agreement between Registrant and State of Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency.
10(o)* Master Agreement between Registrant, United Sugars Corporation, American
Federation of Grain Millers, AFL-CIO, CLC, et al.
10(p)* Loan Agreement between Registrant and St. Paul Bank for Cooperatives, dated
December 20, 1993.
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10(q)* Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between Registrant and First Bank National
Association, dated November 22, 1993.
10(r)* Pension Contract and Amendments.
10(s)* Compensation, Severance and Loan Agreement with Mr. J. Famalette, dated March 2,
1992.
10(t)* Compensation and Loan Agreement with Mr. J. Famalette, dated October 1, 1993.
10(u)* Form of Operating Agreement between Registrant and ProGold Limited Liability
Company.
10(v)* Form of Member Control Agreement between Registrant and ProGold Limited
Liability Company.
10(w)* Administrative Services Agreement between Registrant and ProGold Limited
Liability Company.
10(x)* Uniform Member Marketing Agreement.
10(y)** Coal Supply Agreement between Registrant and Spring Creek Coal Company, dated
August 25, 1995 (Confidential Treatment Requested as to certain provisions).
10(z)** Coal Transportation Agreement between Registrant and Northern Coal
Transportation Company, dated August 25, 1995 (Confidential Treatment
Requested as to certain provisions).
10(aa)*** Gas Sales Contract between Registrant and Coastal Gas Marketing Company, dated
as of March 20, 1996 (Confidential treatment requested as to certain
provisions).
10(bb)*** Employment Agreement with Mr. Daniel McCarty, dated as of April 8, 1996.
10(cc)*** Form of Subscription Agreement for Preferred Stock (Current Members).
Subscription Document A.
10(dd)*** Form of Indication of Interest in Purchasing Additional Shares of Preferred
Stock (Current Members). Subscription Document B.
10(ee)*** Form of Indication of Interest in Purchasing Shares of Preferred Stock
(Prospective Members). Subscription Document C.
10(ff)*** Form of Subscription Agreement (Prospective Members). Subscription Document D.
10(gg)*** Form of Representations and Warranties. Subscription Document E.
23 Consent of Independent Public Accountant.
99 Consents of Directors-Elect.
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Incorporated by reference from the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 33-83868), declared effective November 23, 1994.
** Incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ending August 30, 1995.
*** Incorporated by reference from the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File number 333-11693), declared effective on November 13, 1996.
30
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY
By /s/ DANIEL J. MCCARTY
-----------------------------------------
Daniel J. McCarty,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Dated: November 22, 1996
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this report has
been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- ------------------------------ -------------------------- -------------------
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ DANIEL J. MCCARTY
- ------------------------------ Chief Executive Officer November 22, 1996
Daniel J. McCarty
/s/ JAMES J. HORVATH
- ------------------------------ Chief Financial Officer November 22, 1996
James J. Horvath
/s/ SAMUEL S.M. WAI
- ------------------------------ Corporate Controller November 22, 1996
Samuel S.M. Wai
/s/ PAUL BORGEN
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Paul Borgen
/s/ THOMAS BRYL
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Thomas Bryl
/s/ AIME J. DUFAULT
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Aime J. Dufault
/s/ STEVEN M. GOODWIN
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Steven M. Goodwin
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- ------------------------------ -------------------------- -------------------
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ COURT G. HANSON
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Court G. Hanson
/s/ LONN M. KIEL
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Lonn M. Kiel
/s/ DAVID KRAGNES
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
David Kragnes
/s/ FRANCIS KRITZBERGER
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Francis Kritzberger
/s/ WAYNE LANGEN
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Wayne Langen
/s/ DUANE LIEN
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Duane Lien
/s/ PATRICK D. MAHAR
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Patrick D. Mahar
/s/ BARRY W. MALME
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Barry W. Malme
/s/ ROBERT NYQUIST
- ------------------------------ Chairman November 22, 1996
Robert Nyquist
/s/ G. TERRY STADSTAD
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
G. Terry Stadstad
/s/ ROBERT VIVATSON
- ------------------------------ Director November 22, 1996
Robert Vivatson
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the use of our report dated October 8, 1996, with respect to
the financial statements of American Crystal Sugar Company for the year ended
August 31, 1996, in this Form 10-K (file number 33-83868 and 333-11693).
EIDE HELMEKE PLLP
November 20, 1996
Fargo, North Dakota
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF DIRECTOR-ELECT
The undersigned hereby consents to the reference to him as a director-elect
of American Crystal Sugar Company from the Moorhead Factory District in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1996
and the inclusion of biographical material regarding the undersigned in such
Form 10-K.
November 22, 1996 /s/ MICHAEL ASTRUP
------------------------------------------
Michael Astrup
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF DIRECTOR-ELECT
The undersigned hereby consents to the reference to him as a director-elect
of American Crystal Sugar Company from the Hillsboro Factory District in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1996
and the inclusion of biographical material regarding the undersigned in such
Form 10-K.
November 22, 1996 /s/ JERRY BITKER
------------------------------------------
Jerry Bitker
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF DIRECTOR-ELECT
The undersigned hereby consents to the reference to him as a director-elect
of American Crystal Sugar Company from the Crookston Factory District in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1996
and the inclusion of biographical material regarding the undersigned in such
Form 10-K.
November 22, 1996 /s/ RONALD REITMEIER
------------------------------------------
Ronald Reitmeier
