<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______________ to _______________
------------------------------
Commission file number 1-3187
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 74-0694415
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1111 Louisiana
Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(713) 207-3000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Commission file number 1-13265
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 76-0511406
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1111 Louisiana
Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(713) 207-3000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
-----------------------------
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL
INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM 10-Q
WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants: (1) have filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
As of August 6, 1999, Reliant Energy, Incorporated had 295,814,956 shares of
common stock outstanding, including 10,719,489 ESOP shares not deemed
outstanding for financial statement purposes and excluding 1,133,235 shares held
as treasury stock. As of August 6, 1999, all 1,000 shares of Reliant Energy
Resources Corp. common stock were held by Reliant Energy, Incorporated.
<PAGE> 2
THIS COMBINED QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q IS SEPARATELY FILED BY RELIANT
ENERGY, INCORPORATED (COMPANY) AND RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. (RESOURCES).
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN RELATING TO RESOURCES IS FILED BY THE COMPANY AND
SEPARATELY BY RESOURCES ON ITS OWN BEHALF. RESOURCES MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS
TO INFORMATION RELATING TO THE COMPANY (EXCEPT AS IT MAY RELATE TO RESOURCES AND
ITS SUBSIDIARIES) OR TO ANY OTHER AFFILIATE OR SUBSIDIARY OF THE COMPANY.
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
AND RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPANY:
<S> <C>
Financial Statements........................................................................1
Statements of Consolidated Operations
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited).........................1
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and December 31, 1998.......................................2
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)...................................4
Statements of Consolidated Retained Earnings and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited).........................6
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements..................................7
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of the Company............................................................20
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk of the Company..................32
RESOURCES:
Financial Statements.......................................................................34
Statements of Consolidated Operations
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)........................34
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and December 31, 1998......................................35
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)..................................37
Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)........................38
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.................................39
Management's Narrative Analysis of the Results of
Operations of Resources..............................................................41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings..............................................................43
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............................43
Item 5. Other Information..............................................................44
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K...............................................44
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
------------------------ --------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Electric Operations .......................................... $ 1,166,642 $ 1,181,300 $ 2,016,548 $ 2,027,862
Natural Gas Distribution ..................................... 329,340 330,667 1,007,455 1,061,385
Interstate Pipelines ......................................... 66,117 76,516 132,222 147,497
Wholesale Energy ............................................. 1,937,830 914,022 2,945,933 1,805,395
International ................................................ 43,631 169,435 (7,853) 196,681
Corporate .................................................... 202,739 156,231 423,173 345,242
Eliminations ................................................. (88,471) (91,545) (216,746) (216,114)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total ................................................... 3,657,828 2,736,626 6,300,732 5,367,948
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
EXPENSES:
Fuel and cost of gas sold .................................... 1,621,239 1,050,669 3,038,603 2,329,063
Purchased power .............................................. 924,481 489,479 1,252,988 902,516
Operation and maintenance .................................... 436,656 386,190 835,668 757,830
Taxes other than income taxes ................................ 126,150 119,444 243,471 229,204
Depreciation and amortization ................................ 225,919 235,035 416,504 410,634
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total ................................................... 3,334,445 2,280,817 5,787,234 4,629,247
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
OPERATING INCOME ................................................ 323,383 455,809 513,498 738,701
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Unrealized loss on Automatic Common Exchange Securities (ACES) (68,628) (254,458) (399,939) (443,778)
Time Warner dividend income .................................. 10,312 10,312 20,625 20,625
Other - net .................................................. 1,480 6,295 2,182 13,509
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total ................................................... (56,836) (237,851) (377,132) (409,644)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES:
Interest on long-term debt ................................... 105,866 103,326 209,720 209,355
Other interest ............................................... 21,859 23,034 45,198 47,393
Distributions on trust securities ............................ 13,990 7,302 23,781 14,712
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction ........ (1,405) (612) (2,335) (1,569)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total ................................................... 140,310 133,050 276,364 269,891
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS ....... 126,237 84,908 (139,998) 59,166
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) .................................... 51,475 43,326 (5,068) 47,602
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCOME (LOSS) ............................................... 74,762 41,582 (134,930) 11,564
PREFERRED DIVIDENDS ............................................. 98 98 195 195
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS ........... $ 74,664 $ 41,484 $ (135,125) $ 11,369
=========== =========== =========== ===========
BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE ................ $ .26 $ .15 $ (.47) $ .04
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
<PAGE> 4
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents .................................. $ 66,639 $ 29,673
Accounts receivable - net .................................. 755,888 726,377
Accrued unbilled revenues .................................. 70,609 175,515
Fuel stock and petroleum products .......................... 212,000 211,750
Materials and supplies, at average cost .................... 181,903 171,998
Price risk management assets ............................... 294,950 265,203
Restricted deposit for bond redemption ..................... 200,000
Prepayments and other current assets ....................... 109,091 88,655
----------- -----------
Total current assets ..................................... 1,891,080 1,669,171
----------- -----------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT -- AT COST:
Electric ................................................... 14,238,519 13,969,302
Natural gas distribution and gathering systems ............. 1,801,632 1,686,159
Interstate pipelines ....................................... 1,310,143 1,302,829
Other property ............................................. 107,708 72,299
----------- -----------
Total .................................................... 17,458,002 17,030,589
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization ............. 6,641,995 5,499,448
----------- -----------
Property, plant and equipment - net ...................... 10,816,007 11,531,141
----------- -----------
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill - net ............................................. 2,089,601 2,098,890
Equity investments and advances to unconsolidated affiliates 923,243 1,051,600
Investment in Time Warner securities ....................... 990,000 990,000
Recoverable impaired plant costs ........................... 796,666
Price risk management assets ............................... 92,310 21,414
Other ...................................................... 1,861,493 1,800,681
----------- -----------
Total other assets ....................................... 6,753,313 5,962,585
----------- -----------
TOTAL ASSETS .......................................... $19,460,400 $19,162,897
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
<PAGE> 5
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - (CONTINUED)
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Notes payable .............................................................. $ 1,812,849 $ 1,812,739
Accounts payable ........................................................... 774,846 807,977
Price risk management liabilities .......................................... 255,916 227,652
Current portion of long-term debt .......................................... 647,144 397,454
Other ...................................................................... 791,604 825,120
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities ............................................. 4,282,359 4,070,942
------------ ------------
DEFERRED CREDITS:
Accumulated deferred income taxes .......................................... 2,064,132 2,364,036
Unamortized investment tax credit .......................................... 277,998 328,949
Price risk management liabilities .......................................... 84,753 29,108
Other ...................................................................... 1,134,595 905,014
------------ ------------
Total deferred credits ................................................ 3,561,478 3,627,107
------------ ------------
LONG-TERM DEBT ................................................................ 6,946,144 6,800,748
------------ ------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 1)
Total liabilities ................................................... 14,789,981 14,498,797
------------ ------------
COMPANY/RESOURCES OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS
HOLDING SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
OF COMPANY/RESOURCES - NET ............................................... 705,294 342,232
------------ ------------
PREFERENCE STOCK, NONE OUTSTANDING
CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK, NOT SUBJECT
TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION .................................................. 9,740 9,740
------------ ------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock, no par value ............................................... 3,160,013 3,136,826
Treasury stock, at cost .................................................. (2,390) (2,384)
Unearned ESOP shares ..................................................... (207,071) (217,780)
Retained earnings ........................................................ 1,096,058 1,445,081
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ..................................... (91,225) (49,615)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity ............................................ 3,955,385 4,312,128
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY .......................... $ 19,460,400 $ 19,162,897
============ ============
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
3
<PAGE> 6
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
---------------------
1999 1998
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ........... $(135,125) $ 11,369
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ................................. 416,504 410,634
Deferred income taxes ......................................... (151,386) (122,370)
Investment tax credit ......................................... (50,951) (10,062)
Unrealized loss on ACES ....................................... 399,939 443,778
Undistributed loss (earnings) of equity investments
in unconsolidated affiliates ............................... 64,654 (10,566)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable - net .................................. 70,899 179,348
Accounts receivable - IRS .................................. 140,532
Inventory .................................................. (8,693) (18,315)
Other current assets ....................................... (20,437) (6,741)
Accounts payable ........................................... (33,131) (102,394)
Interest and taxes accrued ................................. (9,663) (31,824)
Other current liabilities .................................. (54,267) (16,746)
Net price risk management assets ........................... (16,734) 25
Other - net ................................................ 84,392 (52,590)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities ................ 556,001 814,078
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures (including allowance for
borrowed funds used during construction) ...................... (441,296) (268,567)
Acquisitions of non-rate regulated electric power plants ........ (230,462)
Sale of equity investments in foreign electric system projects .. 242,744
Equity investment and advances to unconsolidated affiliates - net (20,458) (175,706)
Other - net .................................................... 7,980 (19,892)
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities .................... $(453,774) $(451,883)
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
(Continued on next page)
4
<PAGE> 7
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
---------------------
1999 1998
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payment of matured bonds ........................................ $ (29,000)
Proceeds from issuance of trust preferred securities ............ $ 362,994
Proceeds from issuance of pollution control revenue bonds ....... 215,023 386,634
Restricted deposit for bond redemption .......................... (200,000)
Proceeds from issuance of debentures ............................ 298,514
Payment of debentures ........................................... (12,718)
Payment of common stock dividends ............................... (213,641) (210,376)
Decrease in notes payable - net ................................. (6,725) (339,854)
Extinguishment of long-term debt ................................ (195,636) (402,587)
Conversion of convertible securities ............................ (6) (10,097)
Other - net ..................................................... (14,552) (17,587)
--------- ---------
Net cash used in financing activities ...................... (65,261) (324,353)
--------- ---------
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS .......................... 36,966 37,842
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD ................... 29,673 51,712
--------- ---------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD ......................... $ 66,639 $ 89,554
========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash payments:
Interest (net of amounts capitalized) ........................... $ 243,463 $ 276,679
Income taxes .................................................... 181,210 164,655
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
<PAGE> 8
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED RETAINED EARNINGS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
---------------------------- -----------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance at beginning of period................ $ 1,128,387 $ 1,876,435
Net income.................................... 74,664 $ 74,664 41,484 $ 41,484
------------ -----------
Total.................................... 1,203,051 1,917,919
Common stock dividends........................ (106,993) (103,985)
------------ -----------
Balance at end of period...................... $ 1,096,058 $ 1,813,934
------------ -----------
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS), NET OF TAX:
Balance at beginning of period................ $ (98,495) $ (4,957)
Foreign currency translation adjustments...... 8,049 8,049 (5,164) (5,164)
Unrealized loss on available
for sale securities......................... (779) (779) (6,414) (6,414)
------------ -----------
Balance at end of period...................... $ (91,225) $ (16,535)
============ ===========
========== ===========
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME............................. $ 81,934 $ 29,906
========== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
------------------------------ -----------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance at beginning of period................ $ 1,445,081 $ 2,013,055
Net income (loss)............................. (135,125) $ (135,125) 11,369 $ 11,369
------------ -----------
Total.................................... 1,309,956 2,024,424
Common stock dividends........................ (213,898) (210,490)
------------ -----------
Balance at end of period...................... $ 1,096,058 $ 1,813,934
============ ===========
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS), NET OF TAX:
Balance at beginning of period................ $ (49,615) $ (6,455)
Foreign currency translation adjustments...... (42,929) (42,929) (5,045) (5,045)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available
for sale securities......................... 1,319 1,319 (5,035) (5,035)
------------ -----------
Balance at end of period...................... $ (91,225) $ (16,535)
------------ -----------
------------ -----------
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)...................... $ (176,735) $ 1,289
============ ===========
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
<PAGE> 9
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Included in this combined Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q) for Reliant Energy,
Incorporated (Company) and for Reliant Energy Resources Corp. (Resources) are
the Company's and Resources' consolidated interim financial statements and notes
(Interim Financial Statements) including such companies' wholly owned and
majority owned subsidiaries. The Interim Financial Statements are unaudited,
omit certain financial statement disclosures and should be read with the
combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (Company Form 10-K) and
Resources (Resources Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998 and the
combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (Company First Quarter
10-Q) and Resources (Resources First Quarter 10-Q) for the quarter ended March
31, 1999. For additional information regarding the presentation of interim
period results, see Note 14.
The financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30,
1998 have been restated to reflect the Company's and Resources' adoption of
mark-to-market accounting in the fourth quarter of 1998, retroactive to January
1, 1998. See Note 1(r) of the Company 10-K Notes (as defined below).
The following notes to the financial statements in the Company Form
10-K and the Resources Form 10-K relate to material contingencies. These notes,
as updated herein, are incorporated herein by reference:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company (Company
10-K Notes): Note 1(c) (Regulatory Assets and Other Long-Lived
Assets), Note 1(n) (Investments in Time Warner Securities), Note
1(p) (Foreign Currency Adjustments), Note 2 (Derivative Financial
Instruments), Note 3 (Rate Matters), Note 4 (Jointly Owned Electric
Utility Plant), Note 5 (Equity Investments and Advances to
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries), Note 12 (Commitments and
Contingencies) and Note 16(a) (Foreign Currency Devaluation).
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Resources (Resources
10-K Notes): Note 1(c) (Regulatory Assets and Regulation), Note 2
(Derivative Financial Instruments) and Note 8 (Commitments and
Contingencies).
Historically, the Company has applied the accounting policies
established in SFAS No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation" (SFAS No. 71). For a discussion of the Company's accounting policies
under SFAS No. 71, see Note 1(c) of the Company 10-K Notes. The Texas Electric
Choice Plan, enacted in June 1999, will ultimately deregulate the Company's
electric generation operations. As a result, the Company is required to
discontinue the use of SFAS No. 71 for such operations. For additional
information on the discontinuation of SFAS No. 71, see Note 2.
(2) TEXAS ELECTRIC CHOICE PLAN AND DISCONTINUANCE OF SFAS NO. 71 FOR
ELECTRIC GENERATION OPERATIONS
In June 1999, Texas adopted the Texas Electric Choice Plan
(Legislation) that substantially amends the regulatory structure governing
electric utilities in order to allow retail competition beginning on January 1,
2002. In preparation for that competition, the Company will make significant
changes in the electric utility operations it conducts through Reliant Energy
HL&P. In addition, the Legislation requires the Public Utility Commission of
Texas (Texas PUC) to issue a number of new rules and determinations in
implementing the Legislation.
7
<PAGE> 10
The Legislation defines the process for competition and creates a
transition period during which most utility rates are frozen at their present
levels. The Legislation provides for utilities to recover 100 percent of their
generation related stranded costs and regulatory assets (as defined in the
Legislation).
Retail Choice. Under the Legislation, on January 1, 2002, most
retail customers of investor-owned electric utilities in Texas will be entitled
to purchase their electricity from any of a number of "retail electric
providers" which will have been certified by the Texas PUC. Retail electric
providers will not own or operate generation assets and their sales rates will
not be subject to traditional cost-of-service regulation. Retail electric
providers affiliated with the Company may compete statewide for these sales, but
rates they charge within the electric utility's traditional service territory
are subject to certain limitations at the outset of retail choice, as described
below. The Texas PUC will prescribe regulations governing quality, reliability
and other aspects of service from retail electric providers.
Unbundling. By January 1, 2002, electric utilities in Texas such as
Reliant Energy HL&P will restructure their businesses in order to separate power
generation, transmission and distribution and retail activities into different
units. Under the Legislation, Reliant Energy HL&P is required to submit a plan
to accomplish that separation to the Texas PUC by January 10, 2000. The
transmission and distribution business will continue to be subject to
cost-of-service rate regulation and will be responsible for the delivery of
electricity to retail consumers.
Generation. Power generators will sell electric energy to wholesale
purchasers, including retail electric providers, at unregulated rates beginning
January 1, 2002. To facilitate a competitive market, Reliant Energy HL&P and
most other electric utilities will be required to sell at auction entitlements
to 15 percent of their installed generating capacity no later than 60 days
before January 1, 2002. That obligation to auction entitlements continues until
the earlier of January 1, 2007 or the date the Texas PUC determines that at
least 40 percent of the residential and small commercial load served in the
electric utility's service area is being served by non-affiliated retail
electric providers. In addition, a power generator that owns and controls more
than 20 percent of the power generation in, or capable of delivering power to, a
power region after the reductions from the capacity auction (calculated as
prescribed in the Legislation) must submit a mitigation plan to reduce
generation that it owns and controls to no more than 20 percent in the power
region. The Legislation also creates a program mandating air emissions
reductions for non-permitted generating facilities. The Company anticipates that
costs associated with this obligation will be recoverable through the stranded
cost recovery mechanisms contained in the Legislation.
Rates. Base rates charged by Reliant Energy HL&P on September 1,
1999 will be frozen until January 1, 2002. Effective January 1, 2002, retail
rates charged to residential and small commercial customers by the utility's
affiliated retail electric provider will be reduced by 6 percent from the
average rates (on a bundled basis) in effect on January 1, 1999. That reduced
rate will be known as the "price to beat" and will be charged by the affiliated
retail electric provider to residential and small commercial customers in
Reliant Energy HL&P's service area who have not elected service from another
retail electric provider. The affiliated retail electric provider may not offer
different rates to residential or small commercial customer classes in the
utility's service area until the earlier of the date the Texas PUC determines
that 40 percent of power consumed by that class is being served by
non-affiliated retail electric providers or January 1, 2005. In addition, the
affiliated retail electric provider must make the price to beat available to
consumers until January 1, 2007.
Stranded Costs. Reliant Energy HL&P will be entitled to recover its
stranded costs (i.e., the excess of net book value of generation assets (as
defined by the Legislation) over the market value of those assets) and
regulatory assets related to generation. The Legislation prescribes specific
methods for determining the amount of stranded costs and the details for their
recovery. However, during the base rate freeze from 1999 until January 2002,
earnings above the utility's authorized return formula will be applied in a
manner to accelerate depreciation of generation related plant assets for
8
<PAGE> 11
regulatory purposes. In addition, depreciation expense for transmission and
distribution related assets may be redirected to generation assets for
regulatory purposes during that period.
The Legislation provides for Reliant Energy HL&P, or a special
purpose entity, to issue securitization bonds for regulatory assets and for
stranded costs. These bonds will be sold to third parties and will be amortized
through non-bypassable charges to transmission and distribution customers. Any
stranded costs not recovered through the securitization bonds will be recovered
through a non-bypassable charge to transmission and distribution customers.
Costs associated with nuclear decommissioning that have not been recovered as of
January 1, 2002, will continue to be subject to cost-of-service rate regulation
and will be included in a non-bypassable charge to transmission and distribution
customers.
Accounting. Historically, the Company has applied the accounting
policies established in SFAS No. 71. For a discussion of the Company's
accounting policies under SFAS No. 71, see Note 1(c) of the Company 10-K Notes.
In general, SFAS No. 71 permits a company with cost-based rates to defer certain
costs that would otherwise be expensed to the extent that it meets the following
requirements: (1) its rates are regulated by a third party; (2) its rates are
cost-based; and (3) there exists a reasonable assumption that all costs will be
recoverable from customers through rates. When a company determines that it no
longer meets the requirements of SFAS No. 71, pursuant to SFAS No. 101,
"Accounting for the Discontinuation of Application of SFAS No. 71" (SFAS No.
101) and SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of" (SFAS No. 121), it is required to write
off regulatory assets and liabilities unless some form of recovery continues
through rates established and collected from remaining regulated operations. In
addition, such company is required to determine any impairment to the carrying
costs of deregulated plant and inventory assets in accordance with SFAS No. 121.
In July 1997, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board reached a consensus on Issue No. 97-4, "Deregulation
of the Pricing of Electricity - Issues Related to the Application of FASB
Statements No. 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation,
and No. 101, Regulated Enterprises - Accounting for the Discontinuation of
Application of FASB Statement No. 71" (EITF No. 97-4). EITF No. 97-4 concluded
that a company should stop applying SFAS No. 71 to a segment which is subject to
a deregulation plan at the time the deregulation legislation or enabling rate
order contains sufficient detail for the utility to reasonably determine how the
plan will affect the segment to be deregulated. In addition, EITF No. 97-4
requires that regulatory assets and liabilities be allocated to the applicable
portion of the electric utility from which the source of the regulated cash
flows will be derived.
The Company believes that the Legislation provides sufficient detail
regarding the deregulation of the Company's electric generation operations to
require it to discontinue the use of SFAS No. 71 for those operations. Effective
June 30, 1999, the Company applied SFAS No. 101 to its electric generation
operations. Reliant Energy HL&P's transmission and distribution operations
continue to meet the criteria of SFAS No. 71.
The Company has evaluated the recovery of its generation related
regulatory assets and liabilities. Because the Legislation provides for the
issuance of securitization bonds up to the amount of generation related
regulatory assets at December 31, 1998 and because these bonds will be amortized
through non-bypassable charges to transmission and distribution customers, the
Company believes these amounts are probable of full recovery. If events were to
occur that made the recovery of certain of these regulatory assets no longer
probable, the Company would write off the remaining balance of such assets as a
non-cash charge against earnings. Pursuant to EITF No. 97-4, the recoverable
regulatory assets will not be written off and will become associated with the
transmission and distribution portion of the Company's electric utility
business.
At June 30, 1999, the Company performed an impairment test of its
previously regulated electric generation assets pursuant to SFAS No. 121 on a
plant specific basis. Under SFAS No. 121, an asset is considered
9
<PAGE> 12
impaired, and should be written down to fair value, if the future undiscounted
cash flows generated by the use of the asset are insufficient to recover the
carrying amount of the asset. For assets that are impaired pursuant to SFAS No.
121, the Company determined the fair value for each generating plant by
estimating the net present value of future cash inflows and outflows over the
estimated life of each plant. The difference between fair value and net book
value was recorded as a reduction in the current book value. The Company
determined that $797 million of its $4.5 billion electric generation assets
(prior to the impairment loss) was impaired as of June 30, 1999. Of such
amounts, $745 million relate to the South Texas Project Electric Generating
Station and $52 million relate to two gas-fired generation plants. The
Legislation provides recovery of this impairment through regulated cash flows
during the transition period and through non-bypassable charges to transmission
and distribution customers. As such, a regulatory asset has been recorded for an
amount equal to the impairment loss and is included on the Company's
Consolidated Balance Sheets as recoverable impaired plant costs. This new
regulatory asset will be amortized as it is recovered.
The impairment analysis requires estimates of possible future market
prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the lives of the
plants. The resulting $797 million pre-tax impairment loss is highly dependent
on these underlying assumptions. In addition, after January 10, 2004, Reliant
Energy HL&P must finalize and reconcile stranded costs (as defined by the
Legislation) in a filing with the Texas PUC. Any difference between the fair
market value and the regulatory net book value of the generation assets (as
defined by the Legislation) will either be refunded or collected through future
transmission and distribution rates. This final reconciliation allows
alternative methods of third party valuation of the fair market value of these
assets, including outright sale, stock valuations and asset exchanges. Because
generally accepted accounting principles require the Company to estimate fair
market values on a plant by plant basis in advance of the final reconciliation,
the financial impacts of the Legislation with respect to stranded costs are
subject to material changes. Factors affecting such change may include
estimation risk, uncertainty of future energy prices, the passage of time during
the transition period and the economic lives of the plants. If events occur that
make the recovery of the regulatory asset associated with the generation plant
impairment loss and deferred debits created from discontinuance of SFAS No. 71
pursuant to the Legislation no longer probable, the Company will write off the
remaining balance of such assets as a non-cash charge against earnings. One of
the results of discontinuing the application of SFAS No. 71 for the generation
operations is the elimination of the regulatory accounting effects of excess
deferred income taxes and investment tax credits related to such operations. The
Company believes it is probable that some parties will seek to return such
amounts to ratepayers and accordingly, the Company has recorded an offsetting
liability.
Following are the classes of electric property, plant and equipment
at cost, with associated accumulated depreciation, at June 30, 1999 (including
the impairment loss discussed above) and December 31, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED
TRANSMISSION GENERAL ELECTRIC
AND AND PLANT IN
GENERATION DISTRIBUTION INTANGIBLE SERVICE
---------- ------------ ---------- ------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
June 30, 1999:
Original cost ........................ $ 8,920 $ 4,349 $ 970 $14,239
Accumulated depreciation ............. 4,904 1,270 210 6,384
Property, plant and equipment - net(1) 4,016 3,079 760 7,855
December 31, 1998:
Original cost ........................ $ 8,843 $ 4,196 $ 930 $13,969
Accumulated depreciation ............. 3,822 1,276 207 5,305
Property, plant and equipment - net(1) 5,021 2,920 723 8,664
</TABLE>
- -------------
(1) Includes non-utility generation facilities of $354 million at
June 30, 1999 and $338 million at December 31, 1998 and international
distribution facilities of $25 million at June 30, 1999 and $19 million
at December 31, 1998.
10
<PAGE> 13
In order to reduce potential exposure to stranded costs related to
generation assets, Reliant Energy HL&P redirected $102 million and $195 million
of depreciation in the six months ended June 30, 1999 and year ended December
31, 1998, respectively, from transmission, distribution and general plant assets
to generation assets. Such redirection is in accordance with the Company's
transition to competition plan, approved by the Texas PUC (Transition Plan). See
Note 3(b) of the Company 10-K Notes. The cumulative amount of redirected
depreciation of $297 million is an embedded regulatory asset included in
transmission and distribution and general plant and equipment balances.
The Company reviewed its long-term purchase power contracts and
fuel contracts for potential loss in accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for
Contingencies" and Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory
Pricing." Based on projections of future market prices for wholesale
electricity, the analysis indicated no loss recognition is appropriate at this
time.
Other Accounting Policy Changes. As a result of discontinuing SFAS
No. 71, other accounting policies related to the Company's electric generation
plant have been changed effective July 1, 1999. Allowance for funds used during
construction will no longer be accrued on generation related construction
projects. Instead, interest will be capitalized on these projects in accordance
with SFAS No. 34, "Capitalization of Interest Cost."
In accordance with SFAS No. 71, Reliant Energy HL&P deferred the
premiums and expenses that arose when long term debt was redeemed and amortized
these costs over the life of the new debt. When no new debt was issued to
refinance the retired debt, these costs were amortized over the remaining life
of the retired debt. Effective July 1, 1999, costs resulting from the retirement
of debt attributable to the generation operations of Reliant Energy HL&P will be
recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from
Extinguishment of Debt."
The economic lives of Reliant Energy HL&P's generation plant and
equipment will be reassessed and prospective depreciation rates may be revised
due to changing economic circumstances as a result of the Legislation.
(3) FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENTS
For information about the Company's foreign currency adjustments,
see Note 1(p) of the Company 10-K Notes. The Company has an indirect 11.8%
common stock interest in Light Servicos de Eletricidade S.A. (Light) and through
its investment in Light, has a 9.1% common stock interest in Metropolitana
Eletricidade de Sao Paulo S.A. (Metropolitana), both in Brazil. The Company
accounts for its investment in Light under the equity method of accounting and
records its proportionate share, based on stock ownership, in the net income of
Light and its affiliates (including Metropolitana) as part of the Company's
consolidated net income.
As of June 30, 1999, Light and Metropolitana had total borrowings of
$2.8 billion in non-local currencies. During the first quarter of 1999, the
Brazilian real was devalued and allowed to float against other major currencies.
The effects of devaluation on the non-local currency denominated borrowings
caused the Company to record a non-cash, after-tax charge of $4 million and $91
million in the second quarter and first quarter of 1999, respectively, as a
result of foreign currency translation losses recorded by both Light and
Metropolitana in such periods. At June 30, 1999, one U.S. dollar could be
exchanged for 1.7695 Brazilian reais. Because the Company uses the Brazilian
real as the functional currency in which it reports Light's equity earnings, any
decrease in the value of the Brazilian real below its June 30, 1999 level will
increase Light's liability represented by the non-local currency denominated
borrowings
11
<PAGE> 14
which will also be reflected in the Company's consolidated earnings, to the
extent of the Company's 11.8% ownership interest in Light. Similarly, any
increase in the value of the Brazilian real above its June 30, 1999 level will
decrease Light's liability represented by such borrowings.
(4) DEPRECIATION
(a) Company.
The Company calculates depreciation using the straight-line method.
The Company's depreciation expense for the second quarter and first half of 1999
was $196 million and $335 million, respectively, compared to $193 million and
$332 million for the corresponding 1998 periods. Pursuant to the Transition
Plan, the Company recorded $45 million and $58 million of additional
depreciation for the second quarter and first half of 1999, respectively,
compared to $68 million and $80 million for the corresponding 1998 periods. For
information regarding the additional depreciation of electric utility generating
assets under the Transition Plan, see Note 3(b) of the Company 10-K Notes.
(b) Resources.
Resources calculates depreciation using the straight-line method.
Resources' depreciation expense for the second quarter and first half of 1999
was $34 million and $71 million, respectively, compared to $30 million and $63
million for the corresponding 1998 periods.
(5) COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA OF EQUITY INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES
TO UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
The following table shows certain summary financial information for
the Company's unconsolidated affiliates:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
---------------------------- ---------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues...................... $1,240 $2,045 $2,383 $2,680
Operating expenses............ 913 1,544 1,744 1,986
Net income (loss)............. 107 145 (566) 276
</TABLE>
Dividends received from these affiliates equaled $8.4 million and
$10.5 million for the second quarter and first half of 1999, respectively,
compared to $23.1 million and $26.7 million for the corresponding 1998 periods.
(6) CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
The Company and Resources adopted Emerging Issues Task Force 98-10,
"Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management
Activities" (EITF 98-10) on January 1, 1999 for the energy trading activities of
Reliant Energy Services, Inc. The adoption of EITF 98-10 had no material impact
on the Company's or Resources' consolidated financial statements.
(7) TIME WARNER SECURITIES INVESTMENT
As of June 30, 1999, the Company owned 11 million shares of Time
Warner Inc. (Time Warner) convertible preferred stock (TW Preferred). On July 6,
1999, the Company converted its TW Preferred into 45.8 million shares of Time
Warner common stock (TW Common). Accordingly, the Company will no longer receive
the quarterly pre-tax dividend of $10.3 million that was paid on the TW
Preferred, but
12
<PAGE> 15
is expected to receive a quarterly pre-tax dividend on the TW Common of
approximately $2.1 million (based on current dividend levels).
In 1997, in order to monetize a portion of the cash value of its
investment in Time Warner, the Company sold 22.9 million of its unsecured 7%
Automatic Common Exchange Securities (ACES). The market value of ACES is indexed
to the market value of TW Common. In July 2000, the ACES will be mandatorily
exchangeable for, at the Company's option, either shares of TW Common at the
exchange rate set forth below or cash with an equal value. The current exchange
rate is as follows:
MARKET PRICE OF TW COMMON EXCHANGE RATE
------------------------- -------------
Below $22.96875 2.0 shares of TW Common
$22.96875 - $27.7922 Share equivalent of $45.9375
Above $27.7922 1.6528 shares of TW Common
By issuing the ACES, the Company effectively eliminated the economic
exposure of its investment in Time Warner to decreases in the price of TW Common
below $22.96875. In addition, the Company retained 100% of any increase in TW
Common price up to $27.7922 per share and 17% of any increase in market price
above $27.7922. The closing price per share of TW Common on June 30, 1999 was
$72.625.
Prior to the July 1999 conversion of the TW Preferred, any increase
in the market value of TW Common above $27.7922 was treated for accounting
purposes as an increase in the payment amount of the ACES equal to 83% of the
increase in the market price per share and was recorded by the Company as a
non-cash expense. As a result, the Company recorded in the second quarter and
first half of 1999 a non-cash, unrealized accounting loss of $69 million and
$400 million, respectively (which resulted in an after-tax earnings reduction of
$44 million, or $0.16 per share, and $260 million, or $0.91 per share,
respectively); this correlates to the $83 million and $484 million unrecorded
unrealized gain related to the increase in the market value of TW Common during
the second quarter and first half of 1999. The Company believes the cumulative
unrealized loss for the ACES of $1.7 billion is more than economically hedged by
the approximately $2.3 billion unrecorded unrealized gain at June 30, 1999,
relating to the increase in market value of the TW Common from the Company's
cost.
Upon conversion, the Company recorded an increase in its investment
in TW Common of $2.3 billion, which represents the increase in market value of
TW Common over the Company's cost for the TW Preferred. In addition, the Company
recognized an increase of $1.5 billion in other comprehensive income, which
represents the change in market price of TW Common, net of related deferred
taxes. Upon the sale or other disposition of the TW Common, the Company is
expected to record a gain equal to the amount realized on the sale or
disposition less the original cost of the TW Preferred. As a result of the
conversion, the Company will now record changes in the market price of the TW
Common and the related changes in the market value of the ACES as a component of
stockholders' equity and other comprehensive income.
(8) CAPITAL STOCK
(a) Common Stock.
The Company has 700,000,000 authorized shares of common stock. At
June 30, 1999, the Company had 296,904,308 shares of common stock issued
(286,093,084 outstanding). At December 31, 1998, the Company had 296,271,063
shares of common stock issued (284,494,195 outstanding). Outstanding common
shares exclude (i) shares pledged to secure a loan to the Company's Employee
Stock Ownership Plan (10,719,489 and 11,674,063 at June 30, 1999 and December
31, 1998, respectively) and (ii) treasury shares (91,735 and 102,805 at June 30,
1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively), which are shares received by the
Company in partial payment of exercised stock options.
13
<PAGE> 16
In June 1999, the Company registered the sale of up to 15,000,000
shares of its common stock. The shares may be sold in one or more public
offerings.
As of June 30, 1999, the Company had the authority to repurchase up
to $89 million of its common stock under a repurchase program approved in 1996.
Any repurchase depends on market conditions, might not be announced in advance
and may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions. For
information on the Company's repurchases of its stock since June 30, 1999, see
Note 13.
(b) Earnings Per Share.
The following table presents the Company's basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS) calculation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
------------------- -----------------------
1999(1) 1998 1999(2) 1998
-------- -------- ---------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Basic EPS Calculation:
Income (loss) before preferred dividends ........................ $ 74,762 $ 41,582 $ (134,930) $ 11,564
Preferred dividends ............................................. 98 98 195 195
======== ======== ========== =========
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock .................. $ 74,664 $ 41,484 $ (135,125) $ 11,369
======== ======== ========== =========
Weighted average shares outstanding ............................. 285,474 284,015 285,222 283,773
Basic EPS:
Income (loss) before preferred dividends ........................ $ 0.26 $ 0.15 $ (0.47) $ 0.04
Preferred dividends ............................................. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
======== ======== ========== =========
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock .................. $ 0.26 $ 0.15 $ (0.47) $ 0.04
======== ======== ========== =========
Diluted EPS Calculation:
Income before preferred dividends ............................... $ 74,762 $ 41,582 (134,930) $ 11,564
Interest on 6-1/4% convertible debentures ................... 9 14 18 29
-------- -------- ---------- ---------
Income before preferred dividends assuming dilution.............. 74,771 41,596 (134,912) 11,593
Preferred dividends ............................................. 98 98 195 195
======== ======== ========== =========
Net income attributable to common stock ......................... $ 74,673 $ 41,498 (135,107) $ 11,398
======== ======== ========== =========
Weighted average shares outstanding ............................. 285,474 284,015 285,222 283,773
Stock options .............................................. 576 469 358
Restricted stock ........................................... 740 496 496
6-1/4% convertible debentures .............................. 27 44 44
-------- -------- ---------- ---------
Weighted average shares assuming dilution ....................... 286,817 285,024 285,222 284,671
======== ======== ========== =========
Diluted EPS:
Income (loss) before preferred dividends ........................ $ 0.26 $ 0.15 $ (0.47) $ 0.04
Preferred dividends ................................................ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
======== ======== ========== =========
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock .................. $ 0.26 $ 0.15 $ (0.47) $ 0.04
======== ======== ========== =========
</TABLE>
- ----------------
(1) For the three months ended June 30, 1999, the computation of diluted
EPS excludes purchase options for 23,334 shares of common stock that
have exercise prices (ranging from $28.71 to
14
<PAGE> 17
$35.18 per share) greater than the $28.52 per share average market
price for the period and would thus be anti-dilutive if exercised.
(2) Assumed conversions were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 1999 because
additional shares outstanding would result in an anti-dilutive per
share amount. The computation for the six months ended June 30, 1999
excludes 740,000 shares of restricted stock, 27,000 shares for
assumed conversion of debentures and purchase options for 628,000
shares of common stock, which would be anti-dilutive if exercised.
(c) Preferred Stock.
At June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998, the Company had 10,000,000
authorized shares of preferred stock, of which 97,397 shares of $4.00 Preferred
Stock were outstanding. The Preferred Stock pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per
share, is redeemable at $105 per share and has a liquidation price of $100 per
share.
(d) Preference Stock.
At June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998, the Company had 10,000,000
authorized shares of preference stock, of which 700,000 shares are classified as
Series A Preference Stock, 27,000 shares are classified as Series B Preference
Stock and 1,575 are classified as Series C Preference Stock. At June 30, 1999
and December 31, 1998, there were no shares of Series A Preference Stock issued
and outstanding (such shares being issuable in accordance with the Company's
Shareholder Rights Agreement upon the occurrence of certain events) and 17,000
shares of Series B Preference Stock issued and outstanding. At June 30, 1999,
there were no shares of Series C Preference Stock issued and outstanding (due to
a redemption of 1,575 shares in March 1999). The Series B Preference Stock is
not deemed outstanding for financial reporting purposes, because the sole holder
of such series is a wholly owned financing subsidiary of the Company.
(9) COMPANY/RESOURCES OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE TRUST PREFERRED
SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS HOLDING SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED
DEBENTURES OF THE COMPANY/RESOURCES
(a) Company.
For information regarding $375 million of preferred securities
issued by a statutory business trust formed by the Company, see Note 8(a) of the
Company First Quarter 10-Q. For information regarding $250 million of preferred
securities and $100 million of capital securities previously issued by statutory
business trusts formed by the Company, see Note 9(a) of the Company 10-K Notes.
The sole asset of each trust consists of junior subordinated debentures of the
Company having interest rates and maturity dates corresponding to each issue of
preferred or capital securities, and the principal amounts corresponding to the
common and preferred or capital securities issued by such trust.
The Company has a registration statement under which $125 million of
trust preferred securities and related junior subordinated debt securities are
available for issuance. The issuance of all securities registered by the Company
and its affiliates is subject to market and other conditions.
(b) Resources.
For information regarding $177.8 million of convertible preferred
securities previously issued by a statutory business trust formed by Resources,
of which approximately $1 million was outstanding at June 30, 1999, see Note 5
of Resources 10-K Notes. The sole asset of the trust consists of junior
subordinated debentures of Resources having an interest rate and maturity date
corresponding to the preferred
15
<PAGE> 18
securities, and a principal amount corresponding to the common and preferred
securities issued by the trust.
(10) LONG-TERM DEBT AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING
(a) Company.
(i) Consolidated Debt.
The Company's consolidated long-term and short-term debt outstanding
is summarized in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, 1999 DECEMBER 31, 1998
---------------------- ---------------------
LONG-TERM CURRENT LONG-TERM CURRENT
--------- ------- --------- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
Short-Term Borrowings (1):
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Commercial Paper........................................... $ 1,511 $ 1,360
Lines of Credit............................................ 150
Resources Receivables Facility............................. 300 300
Notes Payable.............................................. 2 3
------- ------- ------ -------
Total Short-Term Borrowings................................... 1,813 1,813
------- ------- ------ -------
Long-Term Debt - net:
ACES ...................................................... $ 2,750 $ 2,350
Debentures (2)(3).......................................... 1,469 1,482
First Mortgage Bonds (2)................................... 1,427 420 1,866 170
Pollution Control Bonds.................................... 801 581
Resources Medium-Term Notes (3)............................ 175 178
Notes Payable (3).......................................... 311 226 330 226
Capital Leases............................................. 13 1 14 1
------- ------- ------ -------
Total Long-Term Debt.......................................... 6,946 647 6,801 397
------- ------- ------ -------
Total Long-Term and Short-Term Debt........................ $ 6,946 $ 2,460 $ 6,801 $ 2,210
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
- -------------
(1) Includes amounts due within one year of the date noted.
(2) Includes unamortized discount related to debentures of approximately
$0.4 million at June 30, 1999 and $1 million at December 31, 1998
and unamortized premium related to debentures of approximately $16.7
million at June 30, 1999 and $17.0 million at December 31, 1998. The
unamortized discount related to first mortgage bonds was
approximately $9.5 million at June 30, 1999 and $9.9 million at
December 31, 1998.
(3) Includes unamortized premium related to fair value adjustments of
approximately $17.2 million and $18.1 million for debentures at June
30, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively. The unamortized
premium for Resources long-term notes was approximately $9.5 million
and $12 million at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998,
respectively. The unamortized premium for long-term and current
notes payable was approximately $2.1 million and $0.5 million at
June 30, 1999 and $3 million each at December 31, 1998,
respectively.
Consolidated maturities of long-term debt and sinking fund
requirements for the Company (including Resources) are approximately $212
million for the remainder of 1999.
(ii) Financing Developments.
At June 30, 1999, a financing subsidiary of the Company had $1.464
billion in commercial paper borrowings supported by a $1.644 billion revolving
credit facility. At June 30, 1999, the weighted average interest rate of these
commercial paper borrowings was 5.26%. At June 30, 1999, the Company had $46.6
16
<PAGE> 19
million in commercial paper borrowings supported by a $200 million revolving
credit facility. The weighted average interest rate of these commercial paper
borrowings was 6.10% at June 30, 1999. For additional information regarding the
Company's and its subsidiaries' financings and repayments, see Note 8(c) and (d)
of the Company 10-K Notes and Note 9(a) of the Company First Quarter 10-Q.
In April 1999, the Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority (GCWDA)
issued on behalf of the Company $19.2 million of revenue refunding bonds having
an annual interest rate of 4.70%. The GCWDA bonds will mature in 2011, and
proceeds from the issuance were used on June 1, 1999 to redeem all outstanding
7.0% GCWDA Series 1989A collateralized revenue refunding bonds ($19.2 million)
at a redemption price of 102% of their aggregate principal amount.
In April 1999, the Matagorda County Navigation District Number One
(MCND) issued on behalf of the Company $100 million of revenue refunding bonds
having an annual interest rate of 5.25%. The MCND bonds will mature in 2026, and
proceeds from the issuance were used on July 1, 1999 to redeem all outstanding
7.125% MCND Series 1989C collateralized revenue refunding bonds ($100 million)
at a redemption price of 102% of their aggregate principal amount.
In April 1999, the Brazos River Authority (BRA) issued on behalf of
the Company $100 million of revenue refunding bonds having an annual interest
rate of 5.375%. The BRA bonds will mature in 2019, and proceeds from the
issuance were used on July 1, 1999 to redeem all outstanding 7.625% BRA Series
1989A collateralized revenue refunding bonds ($100 million) at a redemption
price of 102% of their aggregate principal amount.
For financial reporting purposes, both the MCND and BRA bonds issued
in April 1999 and the MCND and BRA revenue refunding bonds redeemed in July 1999
were deemed to be outstanding at June 30, 1999.
(b) Resources.
As of June 30, 1999, Resources had outstanding $2.0 billion of
long-term and short-term debt. Consolidated maturities of long-term debt and
sinking fund requirements for Resources are approximately $200 million for the
remainder of 1999.
In the second quarter of 1999, Resources purchased $6 million of its
6% convertible subordinated debentures due 2012 at an average purchase price of
96.125% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest. Resources
plans to use the purchased debentures to satisfy the March 2001 sinking fund
requirement of the 6% convertible subordinated debentures. For more information
regarding Resources' financing arrangements, lease commitments and letters of
credit, see Notes 4 and 8(a) and (b) of the Resources 10-K Notes and Note 9(b)
of the Company First Quarter 10-Q.
For information regarding Resources' $300 million receivables
facility, see Note 4(a) of the Resources 10-K Notes. At June 30, 1999, Resources
had sold $300 million of receivables under the facility. The weighted average
interest rate was 5.11%.
For information regarding Resources' $350 million revolving credit
facility, see Note 4(a) of the Resources 10-K Notes. At June 30, 1999, there
were no commercial paper borrowings or loans outstanding under the facility and
letters of credit issued under the facility aggregated $15.2 million.
(11) ACQUISITIONS
As previously disclosed in the Company First Quarter 10-Q, the
Company and one of its subsidiaries have entered into an agreement to acquire an
interest in N.V. Energieproduktiebedrijf UNA (UNA), a
17
<PAGE> 20
power generation company providing service in the Netherlands. Consummation of
that transaction is awaiting certain government approvals in the Netherlands. It
is anticipated that the transaction will close in the third or fourth quarter of
1999. The acquisition schedule contemplates an initial purchase of 40% of UNA's
capital stock, with up to 52% to be acquired no later than December 31, 2002 and
the remainder to be acquired no later than December 31, 2006. It is possible
that some of the acquisition dates may be accelerated. The transaction is
subject to usual and customary conditions, including the receipt of government
approvals on terms and conditions acceptable to the Company. For further
information see Note 11 of the Company First Quarter 10-Q.
(12) REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
In accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information," the Company has identified the following
reportable segments: Electric Operations, Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate
Pipelines, Wholesale Energy, International and Corporate. Electric Operations
provides electric utility generation, transmission, distribution and sales to
customers. Natural Gas Distribution operations consist of natural gas utility
sales to, and natural gas utility transportation for, residential, commercial
and industrial customers. Interstate Pipelines operates two interstate natural
gas pipelines. Wholesale Energy is engaged in the acquisition, development and
operation of, and sale of capacity and energy from, domestic and certain
international non-utility power generation facilities and in the wholesale
energy trading and marketing and natural gas gathering businesses. International
invests in foreign electric and gas utility operations, primarily in Latin
America. Corporate includes a non-rate regulated retail service business,
certain real estate holdings and corporate expenses.
Financial data for the business segments are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRIC NATURAL GAS INTERSTATE WHOLESALE INTER- RECONCILING
OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION PIPELINES ENERGY NATIONAL CORPORATE ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
---------- ------------ ---------- --------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 1999:
Revenues ................. $1,166,642 $ 329,027 $ 26,824 $1,905,758 $ 43,631 $ 185,946 $3,657,828
Intersegment revenues .... 313 39,293 32,072 16,793 $(88,471)
Operating income (loss) .. 284,920 (5,700) 27,206 8,616 15,197 (6,856) 323,383
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 1998:
Revenues ................. 1,181,300 330,363 36,577 885,374 169,435 133,577 2,736,626
Intersegment revenues .... 303 39,940 28,648 22,654 (91,545)
Operating income (loss) .. 293,753 (5,127) 32,849 (26,473) 151,031 9,776 455,809
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE> 21
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRIC NATURAL GAS INTERSTATE WHOLESALE INTER- RECONCILING
OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION PIPELINES ENERGY NATIONAL CORPORATE ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
---------- ------------ --------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 1999:
Revenues....................... $2,016,548 $ 1,006,854 $ 53,305 $ 2,844,640 $ (7,853) $ 387,238 $ 6,300,732
Intersegment revenues.......... 601 78,917 101,293 35,935 $ (216,746)
Operating income (loss)........ 429,400 92,490 55,099 9,794 (62,703) (10,582) 513,498
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 1998
Revenues....................... 2,027,862 1,060,761 69,810 1,713,537 196,681 299,297 5,367,948
Intersegment revenues.......... 624 77,688 91,859 45,943 (216,114)
Operating income (loss)........ 436,364 97,615 64,922 (25,960) 162,011 3,749 738,701
</TABLE>
Reconciliation of Operating Income to Net Income (Loss) (in thousands) is
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
--------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating income................................ $ 323,383 $ 455,809 $ 513,498 $ 738,701
Dividend income................................. 10,312 10,312 20,625 20,625
Interest expense................................ 127,725 126,360 254,918 256,748
Unrealized loss on ACES......................... 68,628 254,458 399,939 443,778
Distribution on trust securities................ 13,990 7,302 23,781 14,712
Income tax expense (benefit).................... 51,475 43,326 (5,068) 47,602
Other income.................................... 2,787 6,809 4,322 14,883
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) attributable to common
shareholders.................................. $ 74,664 $ 41,484 $(135,125) $ 11,369
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
(13) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In July 1999, the MCND issued on behalf of the Company $70.3 million
of revenue refunding bonds having an annual interest rate of 5.95%. The MCND
bonds will mature in 2030 and proceeds from the issuance will be used on October
1, 1999 to redeem all outstanding 7.60% MCND Series 1989D collateralized
pollution revenue bonds at a redemption price of 102% of their aggregate
principal amount.
During the period from July 7, 1999 through August 6, 1999, the
Company purchased 1,041,500 shares of its common stock for $28.6 million at an
average price of $27.47 per share. See Note 7 for more information.
On July 6, 1999, the 11,000,000 shares of TW Preferred owned by the
Company were converted into approximately 45.8 million shares of TW Common. See
Note 7 for more information.
In July 1999, Resources repaid at maturity $200 million of its
8.875% Notes.
(14) COMPANY/RESOURCES INTERIM PERIOD RESULTS; RECLASSIFICATIONS
The Company's and Resources' Interim Financial Statements reflect all
normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary
to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the
respective periods. Amounts reported in the Company's Statements of Consolidated
Operations and Resources' Statements of Consolidated Operations are not
necessarily indicative of amounts expected for a full-year period due to the
effects of, among other things,
19
<PAGE> 22
(i) seasonal variations in energy consumption, (ii) timing of maintenance and
other expenditures and (iii) acquisitions and dispositions of assets and other
interests. In addition, certain amounts from the prior year have been
reclassified to conform to the Company's and Resources' presentation of
financial statements in the current year. These reclassifications do not affect
their respective earnings.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY
The following should be read in combination with the unaudited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
Reliant Energy, Incorporated (Company), together with various
divisions and subsidiaries, including Reliant Energy Resources Corp.
(Resources), is a diversified international energy services company. The Company
reports its financial information in six segments. The Company's Electric
Operations segment operates the nation's tenth largest utility in terms of
kilowatt-hour (KWH) sales. The Natural Gas Distribution segment includes the gas
utility operations of Resources and is the third largest such operation in the
U.S. in terms of number of customers served. The Interstate Pipelines segment
operates two interstate natural gas pipelines. The Wholesale Energy segment is
engaged in the acquisition, development and operation of, and sale of capacity,
energy and ancillary services from, domestic and certain international
non-utility power generation facilities, and in the wholesale energy trading and
marketing and natural gas gathering businesses. The International segment
invests in foreign electric and gas utility operations, primarily in Latin
America. The Corporate segment includes a non-rate regulated retail service
business, certain real estate holdings and corporate expenses.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, PERCENT JUNE 30, PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE 1999 1998 CHANGE
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT
PER SHARE DATA) PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues.............................. $ 3,658 $ 2,737 34% $ 6,301 $ 5,368 17%
Operating Expenses.................... 3,335 2,281 46% 5,788 4,629 25%
Operating Income...................... 323 456 (29%) 513 739 (31%)
Other Expenses(1)..................... 57 238 (76%) 377 410 (8%)
Interest and Other Charges............ 140 133 5% 276 270 2%
Income Tax Expense (Benefit).......... 51 44 16% (5) 48 --
------- ------- ------- -------
Net Income (Loss)(1).................. $ 75 $ 41 83% $ (135) $ 11 --
======= ======= ======= =======
Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per
Share(1)............................ $ .26 $ .15 73% $ (.47) $ .04 --
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Other Expenses and Net Income (Loss) reflect the effect of a $69 million
and $400 million non-cash, unrealized pre-tax accounting loss recorded in
the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to a $254 million and
$444 million pre-tax loss in the same periods in 1998 relating to the
Company's 7% Automatic Common Exchange Securities (ACES). See Note 7 to the
Company's Interim Financial Statements.
Second Quarter of 1999 Compared to Second Quarter of 1998. The Company
reported consolidated net income of $75 million ($0.26 per share) for the second
quarter of 1999 compared to consolidated net income of $41 million ($0.15 per
share) for the second quarter of 1998. The 1999 results reflect a $44 million
after-tax, non-cash, unrealized accounting loss on the ACES and a $4 million
20
<PAGE> 23
after-tax, non-cash loss due to the devaluation of the Brazilian real. The 1998
results reflect a $165 million, after-tax, non-cash unrealized accounting loss
on the ACES.
After adjusting for the charges described above, the Company would
have had consolidated net income of $123 million ($0.43 per share) in the second
quarter of 1999 and $206 million ($0.73 per share) in the second quarter of
1998. The decrease was primarily due to an $80 million, or $0.28 per share, gain
on the sale of the Company's indirect interest in an electric distribution
system in Argentina in the second quarter of 1998. Also contributing to the
decrease was a settlement relating to gas purchase contracts that resulted in
the recognition of approximately $6 million of revenues at Interstate Pipelines
in the second quarter of 1998.
First Six Months of 1999 Compared to First Six Months of 1998. The
Company reported a consolidated net loss of $135 million ($0.47 per share) for
the first six months of 1999 compared to consolidated net income of $11 million
($0.04 per share) for the same period of 1998. The 1999 results reflect a $260
million after-tax, non-cash, unrealized accounting loss on the ACES and a $95
million after-tax, non-cash loss due to the devaluation of the Brazilian real.
The 1998 results reflect a $288 million after-tax, non-cash unrealized
accounting loss on the ACES.
After adjusting for the charges described above, the Company would
have had consolidated net income of $220 million ($0.77 per share) for the first
six months of 1999 and $299 million ($1.05 per share) for the first six months
of 1998. The $79 million decrease was primarily due to the same factors
mentioned above for the quarterly period.
The Company's income tax benefit for the first six months of 1999 was
$5 million. In addition, an income tax benefit is reflected in International's
revenues relating to the Company's after-tax interest in the operations of its
foreign affiliates accounted for under the equity method.
The table below shows operating income (loss) by segment:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
------------------ ------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Electric Operations.................................. $ 285 $ 294 $ 429 $ 436
Natural Gas Distribution............................. (6) (5) 92 98
Interstate Pipelines................................. 27 33 55 65
Wholesale Energy..................................... 9 (26) 10 (26)
International........................................ 15 151 (63) 162
Corporate............................................ (7) 9 (10) 4
------ ------ ------ ------
Total Consolidated................................ $ 323 $ 456 $ 513 $ 739
====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
ELECTRIC OPERATIONS
Electric Operations are conducted under the name "Reliant Energy
HL&P," an unincorporated division of the Company. Electric Operations provides
electric generation, transmission, distribution and sales to approximately 1.6
million customers in a 5,000 square mile area on the Texas Gulf Coast, including
Houston (the nation's fourth largest city).
21
<PAGE> 24
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------------ PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
----------- ----------- -----------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues:
Base Revenues (1) ......................... $ 787 $ 802 (2%)
Reconcilable Fuel Revenues (2) ............ 379 379 --
----------- -----------
Total Operating Revenues ............ 1,166 1,181 (1%)
=========== ===========
Operating Expenses:
Fuel and Purchased Power .................. 394 395 --
Operation and Maintenance ................. 217 214 1%
Depreciation and Amortization ............. 172 185 (7%)
Other Operating Expenses .................. 98 93 5%
----------- -----------
Total Operating Expenses ............. 881 887 (1%)
----------- -----------
Operating Income ............................ $ 285 $ 294 (3%)
=========== ===========
Electric Sales (MWH):
Residential ............................... 4,727,387 4,475,019 6%
Commercial ............................... 4,036,304 3,897,340 4%
Industrial - Firm ........................ 6,678,597 6,773,768 (1%)
Municipal & Public Utilities ............. 91,100 76,521 19%
=========== ===========
Total Firm Billed Sales ............. 15,533,388 15,222,648 2%
=========== ===========
Average Cost of Reconcilable Fuel
(Cents/MMBtu) ............................ 181.8 176.8 3%
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------------ PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
----------- ----------- -----------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues:
Base Revenues (1) ......................... $ 1,356 $ 1,357 --
Reconcilable Fuel Revenues (2) ............ 661 671 (1%)
----------- -----------
Total Operating Revenues .............. 2,017 2,028 (1%)
=========== ===========
Operating Expenses:
Fuel and Purchased Power .................. 688 700 (2%)
Operation and Maintenance ................. 407 408
Depreciation and Amortization ............. 308 315 (2%)
Other Operating Expenses .................. 185 169 9%
----------- -----------
Total Operating Expenses .............. 1,588 1,592 --
----------- -----------
Operating Income ............................ $ 429 $ 436 (2%)
=========== ===========
Electric Sales (MWH):
Residential ............................... 8,553,151 8,072,040 6%
Commercial ................................ 7,652,980 7,321,690 5%
Industrial - Firm ......................... 12,846,497 13,141,747 (2%)
Municipal & Public Utilities .............. 166,395 157,909 5%
=========== ===========
Total Firm Billed Sales ............... 29,219,023 28,693,386 2%
=========== ===========
Average Cost of Reconcilable Fuel
(Cents/MMBtu) ............................. 169.1 179.2 (6%)
</TABLE>
- -------------------
(1) Includes miscellaneous revenues (including transmission revenues) and
certain purchased power-related revenues.
(2) Includes revenues collected through a fixed fuel factor and surcharge, net
of over/under recovery.
22
<PAGE> 25
Electric Operations earnings are capped at an overall rate of return
formula on a calendar year basis as part of the Transition Plan. As a result,
any earnings over the maximum allowed return on invested capital will be used as
additional depreciation of generation assets, mitigating potential stranded
costs. For information on the Transition Plan, see Note 3(b) of the Company 10-K
Notes.
Electric Operations operating income for the second quarter and first
half of 1999 decreased $9 million and $7 million, respectively, compared to the
corresponding 1998 periods. For both periods of 1999, higher base rate credits,
as required under the Transition Plan, and milder weather combined to reduce
operating revenues. Strong customer growth partially offset these effects.
The Company recorded additional depreciation of $58 million and $80
million on generation assets for the first half of 1999 and 1998, respectively.
The Company recorded additional depreciation on generation assets of $45 million
and $68 million for the second quarter of 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Fuel and purchased power expenses for the second quarter of 1999
decreased slightly compared to the 1998 period. For the first half of 1999, such
expenses decreased $12 million compared to the 1998 period as a result of lower
cost per unit for purchased power ($0.0228 per KWH in the 1999 period compared
to $0.0241 per KWH in the 1998 period) and lower reconcilable cost of natural
gas ($2.16 per MMBtu in the 1999 period and $2.31 per MMBtu in the 1998 period),
offset somewhat by higher reconcilable cost per unit of lignite ($1.23 per MMBtu
in the 1999 period compared to $1.10 per MMBtu in the 1998 period).
Other operating expenses increased for the second quarter and first
half of 1999 largely due to higher state franchise and gross receipts taxes.
NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION
Natural Gas Distribution operations are conducted through three
divisions of Resources: Reliant Energy Arkla, Reliant Energy Entex and Reliant
Energy Minnegasco. These operations consist of intrastate natural gas sales to,
and natural gas transportation for, residential, commercial and industrial
customers in six states: Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma
and Texas.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
-------- -------- --------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues:
Base Revenues ............................. $ 155 $ 154 1%
Recovered Gas Revenues .................... 174 177 (2%)
-------- --------
Total Operating Revenues ................ 329 331 (1%)
-------- --------
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas ............................... 172 174 (1%)
Operation and Maintenance ................. 109 107 2%
Depreciation and Amortization ............. 32 32 --
Other Operating Expenses .................. 22 23 (4%)
-------- --------
Total Operating Expenses ................ 335 336 --
-------- --------
Operating Loss .............................. $ (6) $ (5) (20%)
-------- --------
Throughput Data (in Bcf):
Residential and Commercial Sales .......... 43 43 --
Industrial Sales .......................... 13 13 --
Transportation ............................ 10 10 --
-------- --------
Total Throughput ........................ 66 66 --
======== ========
</TABLE>
23
<PAGE> 26
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
------ ------ -------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues:
Base Revenues..................................... $ 422 $ 429 (2%)
Recovered Gas Cost Revenues....................... 585 632 (7%)
------ ------
Total Operating Revenues........................ 1,007 1,061 (5%)
------ ------
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas....................................... 586 632 (7%)
Operation and Maintenance......................... 217 218 --
Depreciation and Amortization..................... 65 63 3%
Other Operating Expenses.......................... 47 50 (6%)
------ ------
Total Operating Expenses........................ 915 963 (5%)
------ ------
Operating Income.................................... $ 92 $ 98 (6%)
====== ======
Throughput Data (in Bcf):
Residential and Commercial Sales.................. 167 169 (1%)
Industrial Sales.................................. 27 29 (7%)
Transportation.................................... 23 22 5%
------ ------
Total Throughput................................ 217 220 (1%)
====== ======
</TABLE>
Natural Gas Distribution operating income for the first half of 1999
decreased $6 million compared to the 1998 period primarily due to a change in
the regulatory methodology of calculating the price of gas charged to customers
in Louisiana at Reliant Energy Arkla. The decreases in recovered gas cost
revenues and purchased gas costs reflect a lower average cost of gas.
INTERSTATE PIPELINES
The Interstate Pipelines segment provides interstate gas
transportation and related services to customers. These operations are conducted
by Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company and Mississippi River Transmission
Corporation, two wholly owned subsidiaries of Resources.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
------ ------ -------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues.................................. $ 66 $ 77 (14%)
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas....................................... 4 8 (50%)
Operation and Maintenance......................... 19 22 (14%)
Depreciation and Amortization..................... 12 10 20%
Other Operating Expenses.......................... 4 4 --
------ ------
Total Operating Expenses........................ 39 44 (11%)
------ ------
Operating Income.................................... $ 27 $ 33 (18%)
====== ======
Throughput Data (in MMBtu):
Natural Gas Sales................................. 4 4 --
Transportation.................................... 204 187 9%
Elimination(1).................................. (4) (4) --
------ ------
Total Throughput.................................... 204 187 9%
====== ======
</TABLE>
24
<PAGE> 27
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
------ ------ -------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues.................................. $ 132 $ 148 (11%)
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas....................................... 9 16 (44%)
Operation and Maintenance......................... 36 40 (10%)
Depreciation and Amortization..................... 24 19 26%
Other Operating Expenses.......................... 8 8 --
------ ------
Total Operating Expenses........................ 77 83 (7%)
------ ------
Operating Income.................................... $ 55 $ 65 (15%)
====== ======
Throughput Data (in MMBtu):
Natural Gas Sales................................. 7 8 (13%)
Transportation.................................... 435 424 3%
Elimination(1).................................. (7) (7) --
------ ------
Total Throughput.................................... 435 425 2%
====== ======
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Elimination of volumes both transported and sold.
Interstate Pipelines operating income decreased by $6 million and $10
million in the second quarter and first half of 1999 compared to the same
periods in 1998. The decreases are primarily due to the settlement of a dispute
related to certain gas purchase contracts that resulted in $6 million of
revenues in the second quarter of 1998 and a rate settlement, reflected in the
first quarter of 1998 as a $5 million reduction of depreciation rates
retroactive to July 1996.
Second quarter operating revenues, net of natural gas purchased cost,
decreased $7 million from 1998 primarily due to the gas purchase contract
settlement discussed above. Expenses, other than natural gas purchased,
decreased $1 million due to continued cost control initiatives.
Operating revenues, net of natural gas purchased cost, for the first
half of 1999 decreased $9 million primarily due to the recognition of $6 million
in revenues from the settlement in the second quarter of 1998 as discussed above
and lower transportation revenues. Lower transportation revenues are primarily
attributable to less weather-related demand and lower spot market transportation
differentials.
WHOLESALE ENERGY
Wholesale Energy includes the acquisition, development and operation
of, and international sales of capacity, energy and ancillary services from,
domestic and certain international non-utility power generation facilities;
wholesale energy trading and marketing; and natural gas gathering activities.
This segment includes operations of subsidiaries owned by the Company and
Resources.
25
<PAGE> 28
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
---------- ------------ --------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues ................... $ 1,938 $ 914 112%
-------- --------
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas ........................ 1,023 501 104%
Purchased Power .................... 834 396 111%
Operation and Maintenance .......... 64 38 68%
Depreciation and Amortization ........ 6 4 50%
Other Operating Expenses ........... 2 1 100%
-------- --------
Total Operating Expenses ......... 1,929 940 105%
-------- --------
Operating Income (Loss) .............. $ 9 $ (26) 135%
======== ========
Operations Data:
Natural Gas (in Bcf):
Sales .............................. 528 242 118%
Gathering .......................... 67 57 18%
-------- --------
Total ............................ 595 299 99%
======== ========
Electricity (in thousand MWH):
Wholesale Power Sales .............. 23,500 16,348 44%
======== ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
---------- ------------ --------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues ................... $ 2,946 $ 1,805 63%
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas ........................ 1,729 1,066 62%
Purchased Power .................... 1,075 697 54%
Operation and Maintenance .......... 116 60 93%
Depreciation and Amortization ...... 12 6 100%
Other Operating Expenses ........... 4 2 100%
-------- --------
Total Operating Expenses ......... 2,936 1,831 60%
-------- --------
Operating Income (Loss) .............. $ 10 $ (26) 138%
======== ========
Operations Data:
Natural Gas (in Bcf):
Sales .............................. 885 506 75%
Gathering .......................... 128 115 11%
-------- --------
Total ............................ 1,013 621 63%
======== ========
Electricity (in thousand MWH):
Wholesale Power Sales .............. 33,768 30,118 12%
======== ========
</TABLE>
Wholesale Energy operating income for the second quarter and first half
of 1999 increased by $35 million and $36 million, respectively, over the 1998
periods primarily due to higher operating income from trading and marketing
activities, partially offset by increased operating and maintenance expenses of
the California power plants, most of which were purchased and began operations
during the second quarter of 1998. The operations of the California plants are
seasonal with the plants running primarily in the third quarter of the year.
Improved results from trading were due to improved margins and volumes on the
sale of natural gas and electricity, net of higher operating expenses due to
staffing increases.
26
<PAGE> 29
Wholesale Energy operating revenues increased $1.02 billion and $1.14
billion in the second quarter and first half of 1999, respectively, primarily
due to an increase in gas and power marketing sales volumes partially offset by
a decrease in the average sales price of gas.
Wholesale Energy purchased natural gas costs increased $522 million and
$663 million in the second quarter and first half of 1999, respectively, due to
an increase in gas sales volume partially offset by a decrease in the average
sales price of gas. Wholesale Energy purchased power expense increased $438
million and $378 million in the second quarter and first half of 1999,
respectively, primarily due to increased power sales volume.
Operation and maintenance expense for Wholesale Energy increased $26
million and $56 million in the second quarter and first half of 1999,
respectively, primarily due to operating expenses of the California plants and
staffing increases.
Depreciation and amortization expense for Wholesale Energy increased $6
million for the first half of 1999 largely due to the depreciation of the
California plants.
To minimize the Company's risks associated with fluctuations in the
price of natural gas and transportation, the Company, primarily through Reliant
Energy Services, Inc. (a subsidiary of Resources), enters into futures
transactions, swaps and options relating to (i) certain commitments to buy, sell
and transport natural gas, (ii) existing natural gas and heating oil inventory,
(iii) future power sales and natural gas purchases by generation facilities,
(iv) crude oil and refined products and (v) certain anticipated transactions,
some of which carry off-balance sheet risk. Reliant Energy Services also enters
into commodity derivatives in its trading and price risk management activities.
For a discussion of the Company's accounting treatment of derivative
instruments, see Note 2 of the Company 10-K Notes and Item 7A (Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk) in the Company's Form 10-K.
INTERNATIONAL
The International segment includes Reliant Energy International, Inc.
(a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) and the international operations of
Resources. Substantially all of International's operations are in Latin America.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
--------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
---- ---- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues ................... $ 44 $169 (74%)
Operating Expenses:
Fuel ............................... 13 5 160%
Operation and Maintenance .......... 14 12 17%
Depreciation and Amortization ...... 2 1 100%
---- ----
Total Operating Expenses ......... 29 18 61%
---- ----
Operating Income ..................... $ 15 $151 (90%)
==== ====
</TABLE>
27
<PAGE> 30
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
---- ---- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues ................... $ (8) $197 (104%)
Operating Expenses:
Fuel ............................... 25 10 150%
Operation and Maintenance .......... 28 23 22%
Depreciation and Amortization ...... 2 2 --
---- ----
Total Operating Expenses ......... 55 35 57%
---- ----
Operating Income (Loss) .............. $(63) $162 (139%)
==== ====
</TABLE>
International had operating income of $15 million in the second quarter
of 1999 and operating loss of $63 million in the first half of 1999 compared to
operating income of $151 and $162 million in the same periods of 1998,
respectively. Results for the second quarter and first half of 1999 reflect a $4
million and $95 million, respectively, after-tax, non-cash charge relating to
the Company's share of foreign exchange losses incurred by its Brazilian
affiliates, Light and Metropolitana, with respect to their non-local currency
denominated borrowings. Such devaluation losses stem from the Brazilian
government's January 1999 decision to allow the Brazilian real to float against
other foreign currencies. Excluding the devaluation loss, operating income for
the second quarter and first half of 1999 would have been $19 million and $32
million, respectively. The decrease in 1999 compared to 1998 operating income
was primarily due to a $138 million pre-tax gain on the sale of International's
63 percent interest in an Argentine electric distribution company in 1998,
partially offset by increased earnings in 1999 from equity investments made in
1998. For more information regarding risks of the Company's international
operations, see "Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings- Risks of
International Operations" below.
Fuel expenses and operation and maintenance expenses were higher in the
1999 periods compared to the 1998 periods primarily due to completion of a
160-megawatt cogeneration facility in Argentina, which commenced operation in
November 1998.
CORPORATE
In the second quarter of 1999, Corporate had an operating loss of $7
million compared to income of $9 million in 1998. Operating loss for the first
half of 1999 was $10 million compared to operating income for $4 million for the
1998 period. The decline in the 1999 periods compared to the 1998 periods is
primarily due to increased information system and business development expenses
and increased expenses associated with certain compensation plans.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
For information on developments, factors and trends that may have an
impact on the Company's future earnings, please read "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries"
in the Company's Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference. Among the
factors discussed are: "Competition and Restructuring of the Electric Utility
Industry," "Competition - Other Operations," "Fluctuation In Commodity Prices
and Derivative Instruments," "Accounting Treatment of ACES," "Impact of the Year
2000 Issue and Other System Implementation Issues," "Risks of International
Operations," "Environmental Expenditures" and "Other Contingencies." Certain
updated information contained in the Notes to the Company's Interim Financial
Statements is referenced below.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ACES
The Company accounts for its investment in Time Warner under the cost
method. As a result of the Company's issuance of the ACES, prior to the
conversion of the TW Preferred into TW Common in
28
<PAGE> 31
July 1999, a portion of the increase in the market value above $27.7922 per
share of TW Common resulted in unrealized accounting losses to the Company.
Excluding the unrealized, non-cash accounting loss for ACES, the Company's
retained earnings and total common stock equity would have been $2.2 billion and
$5.1 billion, respectively, at June 30, 1999. For additional information
regarding the accounting treatment of the ACES and the Time Warner investment,
see Note 7 to the Company's Interim Financial Statements.
TEXAS ELECTRIC CHOICE PLAN
In June 1999, Texas adopted the Texas Electric Choice Plan that
substantially amends the regulatory structure governing electric utilities in
order to allow retail competition beginning on January 1, 2002. In preparation
for that competition, the Company will make significant changes in the electric
utility operations it conducts through Reliant Energy HL&P. For additional
information regarding the Legislation, see Note 2 to the Company's Interim
Financial Statements.
IMPACT OF THE YEAR 2000 AND OTHER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
For a description of the Company's Year 2000 and other system
implementation issues, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company - Certain Factors Affecting
Future Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries - Impact of the Year 2000
and Other System Implementation Issues" in the Company Form 10-K.
All of the Company's and its subsidiaries' business units have
completed a Year 2000 Project analysis of critical systems and equipment that
control the production and delivery of energy, as well as corporate,
departmental and personnel systems and equipment. Remediation and testing of all
systems and equipment that could affect the production and delivery of energy
(Priority 1 items) were completed during the second quarter of 1999. The Company
also completed Year 2000 contingency planning during the second quarter of 1999.
It is anticipated that work will be completed by September 30, 1999 with respect
to Priority 2 items, and by December 1, 1999 with respect to Priority 3 items.
The following table illustrates the Company's completion percentages for the
Year 2000 activities as of July 31, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Assessment.............................................. 100% 99% 98%
Conversion.............................................. 100% 95% 97%
Testing................................................. 100% 92% 95%
Implementation.......................................... 100% 85% 93%
</TABLE>
Total direct costs of resolving the Year 2000 issue with respect to the
Company and its subsidiaries are expected to be between $35 and $40 million and
include approximately $23 million spent through June 30, 1999.
The Company is in the process of implementing SAP America, Inc.'s (SAP)
proprietary R/3 enterprise software. Although it is anticipated that the
implementation of the SAP system will have the incidental effect of negating the
need to modify many of the Company's computer systems to accommodate the Year
2000 problem, the Company does not deem the costs of the SAP system as directly
related to its Year 2000 compliance program. Portions of the SAP system were
implemented in December 1998 and March 1999, and it is expected that the final
portion of the SAP system will be fully implemented by August 2000. The cost of
implementing the SAP system is currently estimated to be approximately $226
million, inclusive of internal costs. As of June 30, 1999, $153 million has been
spent on the implementation.
29
<PAGE> 32
RISKS OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
The Company's international operations are subject to various risks
incidental to investing or operating in emerging market countries. These risks
include political risks, such as government instability, and economic risks,
such as fluctuations in currency exchange rates, restrictions on the
repatriation of foreign earnings and/or restrictions on the conversion of local
currency earnings into U.S. dollars. The Company's international operations are
also highly capital intensive and significantly dependent on the availability of
bank financing and other sources of capital on commercially acceptable terms.
As a result of the devaluation of the Brazilian real, and the resulting
increased operating costs and inflation, Light and Metropolitana received tariff
rate increases of 16% and 21%, respectively, which were phased in over June and
July 1999. Light also anticipates another rate increase in November 1999, for
its annual rate adjustment. The Company is pursuing additional tariff increases
to mitigate the impact of the devaluation; however, there can be no assurance
that such adjustments will be timely or that they will permit substantial
recovery of impact of the devaluation.
For more information on the risks of international operations, see
"Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk of the Company"
herein, Note 3 to the Company's Interim Financial Statements and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the
Company - Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and its
Subsidiaries - Risks of International Operations" in the Company Form 10-K.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
For the first half of 1999, the Company's net cash provided by
operating activities decreased $258 million over the same period in 1998 due in
part to a $141 million tax refund received in the 1998 period and changes in
working capital.
Net cash used in financing activities for the first half of 1999
reflected a $65 million outflow compared to a $324 million outflow for the same
period of 1998. The cash outflow in 1999 included the payment of common stock
dividends, the restricted deposit for bond redemptions and the extinguishment of
long-term debt, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of trust
preferred securities and the issuance of pollution control revenue refunding
bonds.
The following tables provide information about the Company's and
Resources' unused sources of capital at June 30, 1999 and financing transactions
that occurred in the second quarter of 1999:
UNUSED SOURCES OF CAPITAL AT JUNE 30, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SOURCE AVAILABILITY
------ ------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
COMPANY:
$200 million revolving credit facility (1)......................... $ 153
Shelf registration statements (2).................................. 230 preferred stock
580 debt securities
125 trust preferred securities and
related junior subordinated debt
securities
414 common stock(3)
FINANCECO LP:
$1.6 billion revolving credit facility (4)......................... 180
RESOURCES:(5)
$350 million revolving credit facility (6)......................... 335
</TABLE>
- ----------------
(1) Supports up to $200 million of commercial paper borrowings.
(2) Issuance of securities under the shelf registration statements is
subject to market and other conditions.
(3) Amount is based on the closing price of the common stock as of June 30,
1999. The registration statement covers the sale of 15 million shares.
(4) Supports up to $1.6 billion of commercial paper borrowings.
30
<PAGE> 33
(5) Resources also has a $300 million receivables facility that was fully
utilized at June 30, 1999. The Company expects to amend this facility in
the third quarter of 1999 to add an additional $50 million capacity.
(6) Supports commercial paper borrowings and has a $65 million subfacility,
which may be used for letters of credit. At June 30, 1999, there were
outstanding letters of credit totaling $15.2 million.
SECOND QUARTER 1999 REPAYMENTS AND REPURCHASES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TYPE OF DEBT AMOUNT
- ------------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C>
COMPANY:
7% First Mortgage Bonds, pollution control series, due 2008............ $ 19.2
RESOURCES:
6.0% Convertible subordinated debentures due 2012 (1).................. 6.0
</TABLE>
- -----------------
(1) The average purchase price was 96.125%. These debentures will be used to
fully fund the sinking fund for the 6% convertible subordinated
debentures in March 2001.
During the period from July 7, 1999 through August 6, 1999, the Company
purchased 1,041,500 shares of its common stock for $28.6 million. As of August
6, 1999, the Company was authorized to purchase an additional $60 million of its
common stock.
In July 1999, Resources repaid $200 million of its 8.875% notes at
maturity with proceeds from cash generated by operations and newly issued
commercial paper.
SECOND QUARTER 1999 REFUNDING ISSUANCES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE
------ ------------- -------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Brazos River Authority (BRA)............... $100 revenue refunding bonds 5.375%(1) 2019
Matagorda County Navigation
District Number One (MCND)............... $100 revenue refunding bonds 5.25%(2) 2026
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal
Authority (GCWDA)....................... $19.2 revenue refunding bonds 4.70%(3) 2011
</TABLE>
- --------------
(1) On behalf of the Company. Proceeds from the sale were used July 1, 1999
to redeem $100 million 7.625% BRA Series 1989A collateralized revenue
refunding bonds at a price of 102%.
(2) On behalf of the Company. Proceeds from the sale were used July 1, 1999
to redeem $100 million 7.125% MCND Series 1989C collateralized revenue
refunding bonds at a price of 102%.
(3) On behalf of the Company. Proceeds from the sale were used June 1, 1999
to redeem $19.2 million 7% GCWDA Series 1989A collateralized revenue
refunding bonds at a price of 102%.
In July 1999, the Company completed the following refunding issuance:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE
------ ------------- -------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
MCND (1) $70.315 revenue refunding bonds 5.95%(1) 2030
</TABLE>
- --------------
(1) On behalf of the Company. Proceeds will be used on October 1, 1999 to
redeem $70.315 million 7.60% MCND Series 1989D collateralized pollution
control revenue bonds at a price of 102%.
As of June 30, 1999, Light and Metropolitana had $2.8 billion in
non-local currency denominated borrowings. In April 1999, approximately $1.2
billion was refinanced with U.S. Dollar denominated
31
<PAGE> 34
loans, which expire within one year to 14 months, and $300 million was funded
through a 60-day local currency loan. The short-term loan was guaranteed by a
subsidiary of the Company, Light and certain other shareholders of Light and was
repaid through capital contributions in the second quarter of 1999. The
Company's portion of the capital contributions was $28.8 million. Certain
shareholders elected not to contribute their share of the required capital
contributions which increased the Company's capital contribution to $28.8
million from $28.1 million and increased the Company's ownership in Light to
11.8% from 11.69%. For the same reason, Light, through its capital
contributions, increased its ownership interest in Metropolitana to 77.5% from
74.88%, which in turn increased the Company's indirect ownership interest in
Metropolitana to 9.1% from 8.75%.
Due to a number of circumstances, the Company now expects that 1999
operating cash flow for certain of its Colombian operations will not meet
working capital and capital expenditure needs. Consequently, a short-term loan
arrangement was entered into by the Colombian operating companies. It is
currently anticipated that an equity contribution will be made by a subsidiary
of the Company and its partner in this venture. The Company's 50% share is
approximately $30 million in September 1999, with an additional infusion of $15
million in November 1999. This equity injection will be used in large part to
repay the loan.
The Company has a "money fund" through which it and its subsidiaries
can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated and
borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The money fund's net
funding requirements are generally met with commercial paper issued by a
financing subsidiary. At June 30, 1999, Resources had $159.4 million in
investments in this fund.
The Company believes that its current level of cash and borrowing
capability along with future cash flows from operations is sufficient to meet
the needs of its existing businesses. However, to achieve its objectives, the
Company may, when necessary, supplement its available cash resources by seeking
funds in the equity or debt markets.
NEW ACCOUNTING ISSUES
In 2001, the Company and Resources expect to adopt SFAS No. 133,
"Accounting For Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as amended (SFAS
No. 133), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain hedging instruments embedded in other contracts
(collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. The
Company and Resources are in the process of determining the effect of adoption
of SFAS No. 133 on their consolidated financial statements.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK OF THE COMPANY
The Company and its subsidiaries have financial instruments that
involve various market risks and uncertainties. For information regarding the
Company's exposure to risks associated with interest rates, equity market
prices, foreign currency exchange rate risk and energy commodity prices, see
Item 7A of the Company's Form 10-K. These risks have not materially changed from
the market risks disclosed in the Company's Form 10-K. As described in
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations of the Company," in the first half of 1999, the Company reported a
$95 million charge to net income and a $43 million charge to other comprehensive
income, due to the devaluation of the Brazilian real. The charge to net income
reflects increases in the liabilities at Light and Metropolitana for their
non-local currency denominated borrowings using the exchange rate in effect at
June 30, 1999 and a monthly weighted average exchange rate for the first six
months of 1999. The charge to other comprehensive income reflects the
translation effect on the local currency denominated net assets underlying the
Company's investment in Light. As of June 30, 1999, the Brazilian real exchange
rate was 1.7695 per U.S. dollar. An increase of 10% from the June 30, 1999
32
<PAGE> 35
exchange rate would result in the Company recording an additional charge of $17
million and $15 million to net income and other comprehensive income,
respectively.
In the second quarter and first six months of 1999, the Company
recorded an additional $44 million and $260 million unrealized loss (net of tax)
related to the ACES. For further discussion of this loss, see Note 7 to the
Company's Interim Financial Statements. The Company believes that this
additional unrealized loss for the ACES is more than economically hedged by the
unrecorded unrealized gain relating to the increase in the fair value of the TW
Common underlying the investment in TW Preferred since the date of its
acquisition. The Company converted its TW Preferred into TW Common in July 1999.
33
<PAGE> 36
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED)
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
---------------------------- ----------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES ........................................ $ 2,430,890 $ 1,380,470 $ 4,258,954 $ 3,135,011
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
EXPENSES:
Natural gas and purchased power - net ......... 2,149,755 1,140,518 3,593,438 2,521,554
Operation and maintenance ..................... 160,453 149,686 314,367 301,295
Depreciation and amortization ................. 48,096 46,335 98,114 91,065
Taxes other than income taxes ................. 27,637 28,197 57,909 61,869
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
2,385,941 1,364,736 4,063,828 2,975,783
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
OPERATING INCOME ................................ 44,949 15,734 195,126 159,228
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense .............................. (30,191) (25,479) (59,853) (52,379)
Dividend requirement on preferred securities
subsidiary trust............................. (98) (159) (197) (427)
Other - net.................................... 3,727 1,980 6,758 4,536
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(26,562) (23,658) (53,292) (48,270)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES ............... 18,387 (7,924) 141,834 110,958
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) .................... 12,431 (3,051) 64,905 54,003
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCOME (LOSS) ............................... $ 5,956 $ (4,873) $ 76,929 $ 56,955
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
See Notes to Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements.
34
<PAGE> 37
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents............................................. $ 14,448 $ 26,576
Accounts and notes receivable, principally customer................... 732,984 682,552
Unbilled revenue...................................................... 23,278 145,131
Accounts and notes receivable - affiliated companies.................. 200,859 193,177
Income tax receivable................................................. 36,472
Gas in underground storage............................................ 109,758 79,855
Materials and supplies................................................ 33,096 33,947
Fuel stock and petroleum products..................................... 34,878 81,230
Price risk management assets.......................................... 294,950 265,203
Other current assets.................................................. 65,641 39,234
------------- -------------
Total current assets................................................ 1,546,364 1,546,905
------------- -------------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Natural gas distribution and gathering systems........................ 1,801,632 1,686,159
Interstate pipelines.................................................. 1,310,144 1,302,829
Other................................................................. 18,088 13,976
------------- -------------
Total............................................................... 3,129,864 3,002,964
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization........................ 250,289 187,936
------------- -------------
Property, plant and equipment - net................................... 2,879,575 2,815,028
------------- -------------
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill, net......................................................... 2,021,940 2,050,386
Price risk management assets.......................................... 92,310 21,414
Deferred debits - net................................................. 218,964 221,788
------------- -------------
Total other assets.................................................. 2,333,214 2,293,588
------------- -------------
TOTAL ASSETS............................................................ $ 6,759,153 $ 6,655,521
============= =============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements.
35
<PAGE> 38
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - (CONTINUED)
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current maturities of long-term debt.................................. $ 200,491 $ 203,438
Receivables facility.................................................. 300,000 300,000
Accounts payable, principally trade................................... 575,646 622,262
Accounts payable - affiliated companies............................... 64,262
Interest payable...................................................... 35,529 36,197
Other taxes........................................................... 32,973 42,107
Customer deposits..................................................... 34,780 36,985
Price risk management liabilities..................................... 255,916 227,652
Other current liabilities............................................. 108,528 172,616
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities....................................... 1,608,125 1,641,257
------------- -------------
DEFERRED CREDITS AND OTHER LIABILITIES:
Accumulated deferred income taxes..................................... 534,988 511,070
Price risk management liabilities..................................... 84,753 29,108
Other................................................................. 392,866 397,141
------------- -------------
Total deferred credits and other liabilities...................... 1,012,607 937,319
------------- -------------
LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES................................. 1,496,530 1,513,289
------------- -------------
Total Liabilities................................................ 4,117,262 4,091,865
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 1)
RESOURCES OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED
SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUST HOLDING SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED
DEBENTURES OF RESOURCES - NET ........................................ 1,144 1,157
------------- -------------
STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY:
Common stock.......................................................... 1 1
Paid-in capital....................................................... 2,463,831 2,463,831
Retained earnings..................................................... 191,600 114,671
Accumulated other comprehensive income................................ (14,685) (16,004)
------------- -------------
Total stockholder's equity...................................... 2,640,747 2,562,499
------------- -------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY........................... $ 6,759,153 $ 6,655,521
============= =============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements.
36
<PAGE> 39
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED)
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------------
1999 1998
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income............................................................ $ 76,929 $ 56,955
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization....................................... 98,114 91,065
Deferred income taxes............................................... 28,027 29,734
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable - net................................. 59,239 189,924
Inventories......................................................... 17,300 (12,591)
Other current assets................................................ (54,479) 23,110
Accounts payable.................................................... 17,646 (83,462)
Interest and taxes accrued.......................................... (9,802) (41,932)
Other current liabilities........................................... (66,293) (11,909)
Net price risk management activities................................ (16,734) 25
Other - net......................................................... (12,641) 30,964
------------- -------------
Net cash provided by operating activities....................... 137,306 271,883
------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures.................................................. (135,467) (106,267)
Other - net........................................................... 5,752 1,147
------------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities........................... (129,715) (105,120)
============= =============
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Retirements and reacquisitions of long-term debt...................... (12,042) (29,000)
Decrease in notes payable............................................. (419,779)
Proceeds from issuance of debentures.................................. 298,514
Redemption of convertible securities.................................. (6) (10,097)
Other - net........................................................... (7,671) (12,126)
------------- -------------
Net cash used in financing activities............................. (19,719) (172,488)
------------- -------------
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS............................... (12,128) (5,725)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD.................... 26,576 35,682
------------- -------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF THE PERIOD.......................... $ 14,448 $ 29,957
============= =============
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash payments:
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)................................. $ 46,359 $ 63,798
Income taxes - net.................................................... 62,606 75,129
</TABLE>
See Notes to Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements.
37
<PAGE> 40
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
------------------------------ -------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance at beginning of period................. $ 185,644 $ 82,675
Net Income (Loss).............................. 5,956 $ 5,956 (4,873) $ (4,873)
------------- -------------
Balance at end of period....................... $ 191,600 $ 77,802
============= =============
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS), NET OF TAX:
Balance at beginning of period................. $ (13,906) $ (4,255)
Unrealized loss on available for sale
securities, net tax of $442 and $3,635....... (779) (779) (6,414) (6,414)
------------- -------------
Balance at end of period....................... $ (14,685) $ (10,669)
============= =============
------------- -------------
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)...................... $ 5,177 $ (11,287)
============= =============
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
------------------------------ -------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance at beginning of period................. $ 114,671 $ 20,847
Net income..................................... 76,929 $ 76,929 56,955 $ 56,955
------------- -------------
Balance at end of period....................... $ 191,600 $ 77,802
============= =============
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS), NET OF TAX:
Balance at beginning of period................. $ (16,004) $ (5,634)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale
securities, net tax of $(747) and $2,854..... 1,319 1,319 (5,035) (5,035)
------------- -------------
Balance at end of period....................... $ (14,685) $ (10,669)
============= =============
------------- -------------
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME............................. $ 78,248 $ 51,920
============= =============
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements.
38
<PAGE> 41
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Reliant
Energy Resources Corp. (Resources) are included in the Notes to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements of Reliant Energy, Incorporated (Company) as
follows and are incorporated herein by reference:
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION -- see Note 1 to the Company's Interim Financial
Statements.
(2) DEPRECIATION -- see Note 4(b) to the Company's Interim Financial
Statements.
(3) CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE -- see Note 6 to the Company's Interim
Financial Statements.
(4) COMPANY/RESOURCES OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE TRUST PREFERRED
SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS HOLDING SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED
DEBENTURES OF THE COMPANY/RESOURCES -- see Note 9(b) to the Company's
Interim Financial Statements.
(5) LONG-TERM DEBT AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING -- see Note 10(b) to the
Company's Interim Financial Statements.
(6) REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
Effective January 1, 1998, Resources adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS No. 131). Because
Resources is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Resources has determined
its reportable segments based in part on the operating units under which its
parent manages sales to wholesale or retail customers in differing regulatory
environments. The segment financial data include information for the Company and
Resources on a combined basis, except for Electric Operations, which has no
Resources operations, and International, which has minimal Resources operations.
Reconciling items included under the caption "Elimination of Non-Resources
Operations" reduce the amounts by those operations not conducted within the
Resources legal entity. Operations not owned or operated by Resources, but
included in segment information before elimination, include primarily the
operations of the Company's non-rate regulated power generation business, and
non-Resources corporate expenses.
In accordance with SFAS No. 131, the Company has identified the
following reportable segments: Electric Operations, Natural Gas Distribution,
Interstate Pipelines, Wholesale Energy, International and Corporate. See Note 12
to the Company's Interim Financial Statements for a description of these
segments.
39
<PAGE> 42
Financial data for business segments are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELIMINATION OF
NON-
NATURAL GAS INTERSTATE WHOLESALE CORPORATE RECONCILING RESOURCES
DISTRIBUTION PIPELINES ENERGY AND OTHER ELIMINATIONS(1) OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATED
------------ ---------- ----------- --------- --------------- -------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 1999:
Revenues....................... $ 329,027 $ 26,824 $ 1,905,758 $ 185,946 $ (16,665) $ 2,430,890
Intersegment revenues.......... 313 39,293 32,072 16,793 $ (88,471)
Operating income (loss)........ (5,700) 27,206 8,616 (6,856) 21,683 44,949
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 1998:
Revenues....................... 330,363 36,577 885,374 133,577 (5,421) 1,380,470
Intersegment revenues.......... 303 39,940 28,648 22,654 (91,545)
Operating income (loss)........ (5,127) 32,849 (26,473) 9,776 4,709 15,734
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 1999:
Revenues....................... $ 1,006,854 $ 53,305 $ 2,844,640 $ 387,238 $ (33,083) $ 4,258,954
Intersegment revenues.......... 601 78,917 101,293 35,935 $ (216,746)
Operating income (loss)........ 92,490 55,099 9,794 (10,582) 48,325 195,126
For the Six Months Ended
June 30, 1998:
Revenues....................... 1,060,761 69,810 1,713,537 299,297 (8,394) 3,135,011
Intersegment revenues.......... 624 77,688 91,859 45,943 (216,114)
Operating income (loss)........ 97,615 64,922 (25,960) 3,749 18,902 159,228
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Includes data for operations conducted at the parent level and for
subsidiaries of the Company that are not Resources entities. This data is
eliminated for purposes of the consolidated data at the Resources level.
Reconciliation of Operating Income to Net Income (Loss) (in thousands) is
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
------------------------ ------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating income ............................ $ 44,949 $ 15,734 $ 195,126 $ 159,228
Interest expense ............................ 30,191 25,479 59,853 52,379
Distribution on preferred trust securities... 98 159 197 427
Income tax expense (benefit) ................ 12,431 (3,051) 64,905 54,003
Other income - net .......................... 3,727 1,980 6,758 4,536
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) ........................... $ 5,956 $ (4,873) $ 76,929 $ 56,955
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(7) COMPANY/RESOURCES INTERIM PERIOD RESULTS; RECLASSIFICATIONS -- see
Note 14 to the Company's Interim Financial Statements.
40
<PAGE> 43
MANAGEMENT'S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF
THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RESOURCES
Resources reports its financial information in the following segments:
Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate Pipelines, Wholesale Energy (through which
Resources conducts energy trading and marketing operations and natural gas
gathering operations, but does not conduct the operations of Reliant Energy
Power Generation, Inc.) and Corporate. Although Resources has international
operations, they are not significant.
Resources meets the conditions specified in General Instruction H to
Form 10-Q and is permitted to use the reduced disclosure format for wholly owned
subsidiaries of reporting companies. Accordingly, Resources has omitted from
this report the information called for by Item 3 (quantitative and qualitative
disclosure about market risk) of Part I and the following Part II items of Form
10-Q: Item 2 (changes in securities and use of proceeds), Item 3 (defaults upon
senior securities) and Item 4 (submission of matters to a vote of security
holders). The following discussion explains material changes in the amount of
revenue and expense items of Resources between the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 1999 and 1998. Reference is made to Management's Narrative
Analysis of the Results of Operations in Item 7 of Resources' Form 10-K, the
Resources 10-K Notes referred to herein and Resources' Interim Financial
Statements contained in this Form 10-Q.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
----------- ----------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues ......................... $ 2,430,890 $ 1,380,470 76%
Operating Expenses ......................... 2,385,941 1,364,736 75%
Operating Income - Net ..................... 44,949 15,734 186%
Interest Expense - Net ..................... 30,191 25,479 18%
Distributions on Subsidiary Trust Securities 98 159 (38%)
Other Income - Net ........................ 3,727 1,980 88%
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) ............... 12,431 (3,051) --
----------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) ........................ $ 5,956 $ (4,873) --
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------- PERCENT
1999 1998 CHANGE
----------- ----------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues ......................... $ 4,258,954 $ 3,135,011 36%
Operating Expenses ......................... 4,063,828 2,975,783 37%
Operating Income - Net ..................... 195,126 159,228 23%
Interest Expense - Net ..................... 59,853 52,379 14%
Distributions on Subsidiary Trust Securities 197 427 (54%)
Other Income - Net ......................... 6,758 4,536 49%
Income Tax Expense ......................... 64,905 54,003 20%
----------- -----------
Net Income ............................... $ 76,929 $ 56,955 35%
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Second Quarter of 1999 Compared to Second Quarter of 1998. Resources'
net income improved $10.8 million in the second quarter of 1999 compared to the
1998 period. This increase was primarily due to increased operating income
related to improved trading and marketing results at Wholesale Energy partially
offset by lower 1999 earnings at Interstate Pipelines due to the settlement of a
dispute related to certain gas purchase contracts that resulted in $6 million of
revenues in the second quarter of 1998.
Resources' net income increased $20 million in the first six months of
1999 compared to the 1998 period primarily due to increased operating income
related to improved trading and marketing results at
41
<PAGE> 44
Wholesale Energy. This increase was partially offset by lower earnings at
Interstate Pipelines due to the gas purchase contracts settlement discussed
above and a rate settlement in the first quarter of 1998 which resulted in $5
million of reduced depreciation expense in that period. Improved results from
trading and marketing in the second quarter and first half of 1999 were due to
improved margins and volumes on the sale of natural gas and electricity, net of
higher operating expenses due to staffing increases.
Resources' revenues increased $1.05 billion and $1.1 billion in the
second quarter and first half of 1999, respectively, compared to the same
periods of 1998 primarily due to increased trading and marketing activities at
Wholesale Energy. This increase was partially offset by a decrease at Natural
Gas Distribution due to a lower average cost of gas and at Interstate Pipelines
due to the $6 million settlement in 1998 discussed above and lower
transportation revenues. Lower transportation revenues are primarily
attributable to less weather-related demand and lower spot market transportation
differentials.
Resources' operating expenses increased $1.02 billion and $1.09 billion
in the second quarter and first half of 1999, respectively, compared to the
corresponding periods in 1998 primarily due to increases in purchased natural
gas costs and purchased power expenses at Wholesale Energy. Purchased natural
gas cost increased primarily due to greater gas sales volumes partially offset
by a decrease in the average sales price of gas. Purchased power expenses
increased primarily due to increased power sales volumes.
To minimize risks associated with fluctuations in the price of natural
gas and transportation, Resources, through its subsidiary, Reliant Energy
Services, Inc., enters into futures transactions, swaps and options relating to
(i) certain commitments to buy, sell and transport natural gas, (ii) existing
natural gas and heating oil inventory, (iii) crude oil and refined products and
(iv) certain anticipated transactions, some of which carry off-balance sheet
risk. Reliant Energy Services also enters into commodity derivatives in its
trading and price risk management activities. For a discussion of the accounting
treatment of derivative instruments, see Note 2 of Resources 10-K Notes and Item
7A (Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk) in the Company's
Form 10-K.
Seasonality and Other Factors. Resources results of operations are
affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for and, to a lesser extent, the
price of natural gas. Resources results of operations are also affected by,
among other things, the actions of various federal and state governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over rates charged by Resources and its
subsidiaries, competition in Resources various business operations, debt service
costs and income tax expense. For a discussion of certain other factors that may
affect Resources future earnings see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company - Certain Factors
Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries - Competition -
Other Operations," "- Fluctuations in Commodity Prices and Derivative
Instruments," "Environmental Expenditures" and "- Other Contingencies " in the
Company's Form 10-K.
NEW ACCOUNTING ISSUES
Reference is made to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -- New Accounting Issues" in
the Company's Form 10-Q for a discussion of certain new accounting issues
affecting Resources.
42
<PAGE> 45
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Company:
For a description of legal proceedings affecting the Company
and its subsidiaries, please review Item 3 of the Company Form
10-K and Notes 3(b), 12(h) and 12(i) of the Company 10-K
Notes, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Resources:
For a description of legal proceedings affecting Resources,
please review Note 8(g) of the Resources 10-K Notes, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Company
At the annual meeting of the Company's shareholders held on
May 5, 1999, the matters voted upon and the number of votes
cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of
abstentions and broker non-votes as to such matters (including
a separate tabulation with respect to each nominee for office)
were as stated below:
The following four nominees for Class III directors were
elected to serve three-year terms expiring in 2002:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR WITHHELD
----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
James A. Baker, III 246,485,461 4,339,053
Richard E. Balzhiser 246,589,050 4,235,464
O. Holcombe Crosswell 246,787,595 4,036,919
Don D. Jordan 246,423,076 4,401,438
</TABLE>
The proposal to amend the Company's Restated Articles of
Incorporation to change its name from "Houston Industries
Incorporated" to "Reliant Energy, Incorporated" was approved
with 246,013,385 votes for, 3,012,801 votes against and
1,798,328 abstentions.
The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP
as independent accountants and auditors for the Company for
1999 was approved with 247,073,625 votes for, 2,301,536 votes
against and 1,449,353 abstentions.
There were no broker non-votes.
Resources
Omitted pursuant to Instruction H(2)(b).
43
<PAGE> 46
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
Forward-Looking Statements. From time to time, the Company and
Resources may make statements regarding their assumptions, projections,
expectations, intentions or beliefs about future events. These
statements and other statements that are not historical facts are
intended as "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company and Resources caution that
assumptions, projections, expectations, intentions or beliefs about
future events may and often do vary materially from actual results, and
the differences between assumptions, projections, expectations,
intentions or beliefs and actual results can be material. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ
materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements.
The following are some of the factors that could cause actual results
to differ from those expressed or implied in forward-looking
statements: (i) state and federal legislative and regulatory
initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on
rate structures and affect the speed and degree to which competition
enters the electric and natural gas industries; (ii) industrial,
commercial and residential growth in service territories of the Company
and Resources; (iii) the weather and other natural phenomena; (iv) the
timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and interest rates;
(v) changes in environmental and other laws and regulations to which
the Company, Resources and their respective subsidiaries are subject or
other external factors over which the Company and Resources have no
control; (vi) the results of financing efforts; (vii) growth in
opportunities for the Company's and Resources' subsidiaries and
diversified operations; (viii) risks incidental to the Company's
overseas operations (including the effects of fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates); (ix) the effect of the Company's and
Resources' accounting policies; (x) the timing of the closing of the
Company's acquisition of an interest in UNA; and (xi) other factors
discussed in this and other filings by the Company and Resources with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
When used in the Company's or Resources' documents or oral
presentations, the words "anticipate," "estimate," "expect,"
"objective," "projection," "forecast," "goal" or similar words are
intended to identify forward-looking statements.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) Exhibits.
Company:
Exhibit 12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
Dividends.
Exhibit 27 Financial Data Schedule.
Exhibit 99 Items incorporated by reference from the Company
Form 10-K: Item 3 "Legal Proceedings," Item 7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the
Company and its Subsidiaries" and "- New Accounting
Issues," and Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk" and Note 1(c)
(Regulatory Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets),
Note 1(f) (Depreciation and Amortization Expense),
Note 1(n) (Investments in Time Warner Securities),
Note 1(p) (Foreign Currency Adjustments), Note 1(r)
(Change in Accounting Principle), Note 2 (Derivative
Financial Instruments), Note 3 (Rate Matters), Note
4 (Jointly Owned Electric Utility Plant), Note 5
(Equity Investments and Advances to Unconsolidated
Subsidiaries), Note 8(c) (FinanceCo and
44
<PAGE> 47
FinanceCo II Credit Facilities), Note 8(d) (Company
Credit Facility), Note 9(a) (Trust Securities -
Company), Note 12 (Commitments and Contingencies)
and Note 16(a) (Foreign Currency Devaluation) of the
Company 10-K Notes. Items incorporated by reference
from the Company First Quarter 10-Q: Note 8(a)
(Company/Resources Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable
Trust Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts
Holding Solely Junior Subordinated Debentures of the
Company/Resources), Note 9(a) (Long-Term Debt and
Short-Term Financing) and Note 11 (Acquisitions).
Resources:
Exhibit 12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
Exhibit 27 Financial Data Schedule.
Exhibit 99 Items incorporated by reference from Resources Form
10-K: Item 3 "Legal Proceedings," Item 7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the
Company and its Subsidiaries" and "- New Accounting
Issues," Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk," Item 7 "Management's
Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations of
Reliant Energy Resources Corp. and Consolidated
Subsidiaries" and Note 1(c) (Regulatory Assets and
Regulation), Note 2 (Derivative Financial
Instruments), Note 4 (Long-Term and Short-Term
Financing), Note 5 (Trust Securities), and Note 8
(Commitments and Contingencies) of Resources 10-K
Notes. Item incorporated by reference from the
Resources First Quarter 10-Q: Note 9(b) (Long-Term
Debt and Short-Term Financing).
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
Company:
Form 8-K filed July 7, 1999 regarding the passage of Texas Electric
Choice Plan.
Resources:
None.
45
<PAGE> 48
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Mary P. Ricciardello
-------------------------------------
Mary Ricciardello
Senior Vice President and Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 13, 1999
<PAGE> 49
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Mary P. Ricciardello
-------------------------------------
Mary Ricciardello
Senior Vice President and Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 13, 1999
<PAGE> 50
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Company:
--------
<S> <C>
Exhibit 12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
Dividends.
Exhibit 27 Financial Data Schedule.
Exhibit 99 Items incorporated by reference from the Company
Form 10-K: Item 3 "Legal Proceedings," Item 7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the
Company and its Subsidiaries" and "- New Accounting
Issues," and Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk" and Note 1(c)
(Regulatory Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets),
Note 1(f) (Depreciation and Amortization Expense),
Note 1(n) (Investments in Time Warner Securities),
Note 1(p) (Foreign Currency Adjustments), Note 1(r)
(Change in Accounting Principle), Note 2 (Derivative
Financial Instruments), Note 3 (Rate Matters), Note
4 (Jointly Owned Electric Utility Plant), Note 5
(Equity Investments and Advances to Unconsolidated
Subsidiaries), Note 8(c) (FinanceCo and FinanceCo II
Credit Facilities), Note 8(d) (Company Credit
Facility), Note 9(a) (Trust Securities - Company),
Note 12 (Commitments and Contingencies) and Note
16(a) (Foreign Currency Devaluation) of the Company
10-K Notes. Items incorporated by reference from the
Company First Quarter 10-Q: Note 8(a)
(Company/Resources Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable
Trust Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts
Holding Solely Junior Subordinated Debentures of the
Company/Resources), Note 9(a) (Long-Term Debt and
Short-Term Financing) and Note 11 (Acquisitions).
Resources:
----------
Exhibit 12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
Exhibit 27 Financial Data Schedule.
Exhibit 99 Items incorporated by reference from Resources Form
10-K: Item 3 "Legal Proceedings," Item 7
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the
Company and its Subsidiaries" and "- New Accounting
Issues," Item 7A "Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk," Item 7 "Management's
Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations of
Reliant Energy Resources Corp. and Consolidated
Subsidiaries" and Note 1(c) (Regulatory Assets and
Regulation), Note 2 (Derivative Financial
Instruments), Note 4 (Long-Term and Short-Term
Financing), Note 5 (Trust Securities), and Note 8
(Commitments and Contingencies) of Resources 10-K
Notes. Item incorporated by reference from the
Resources First Quarter 10-Q: Note 9(b) (Long-Term
Debt and Short-Term Financing).
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 12
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Six Twelve
Months Ended Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
1999 1999
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Fixed Charges as Defined:
(1) Interest on Long-Term Debt ..................................... $ 209,720 $ 416,503
(2) Other Interest ................................................. 45,198 95,572
(3) Capitalized Interest ........................................... 1,653 6,472
(4) Distribution on Trust Securities ............................... 23,781 38,270
(5) Interest Component of Rentals Charged to Operating Expense ..... 5,482 11,513
---------- ----------
(6) Total Fixed Charges ............................................ $ 285,834 $ 568,330
========== ==========
Earnings as Defined:
(7) Income (loss) from Continuing Operations ....................... $ (135,125) $ (287,976)
(8) Income Taxes for Continuing Operations ......................... (5,068) (83,102)
(9) Fixed Charges (line 6) ......................................... 285,834 568,329
(10) Capitalized Interest ........................................... (1,653) (6,472)
---------- ----------
(11) Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
and Fixed Charges............................................... $ 143,988 $ 190,780
========== ==========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(line 11 divided by line 6)..................................... 0.50 0.34
Preferred Dividends Requirements:
(12) Preferred Stock Dividends ...................................... $ 195 $ 390
(13) Less Tax Deduction for Preferred Dividends ..................... 27 54
---------- ----------
(14) Total .......................................................... $ 168 $ 336
========== ==========
(15) Ratio of Pre-Tax Income from Continuing Operations to Net
Income (line 7 plus line 8 divided by line 7)................... 1.04 1.29
---------- ----------
(16) Line 14 times line 15 .......................................... $ 175 $ 433
(17) Add Back Tax Deduction (line 13) ............................... 27 54
---------- ----------
(18) Preferred Dividends Factor ..................................... $ 202 $ 487
========== ==========
(19) Total Fixed Charges (line 6) ................................... $ 285,834 $ 568,330
(20) Preferred Dividends Factor (line 18) ........................... 202 487
---------- ----------
(21) Total .......................................................... $ 285,036 $ 568,817
========== ==========
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends
(line 11 divided by line 21) ................................... 0.50 0.34
========== ==========
</TABLE>
Earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges; the coverage deficiency is
approximately $142 million for the six-month period ending June 30, 1999 and
$378 million for the twelve-month period ending June 30, 1999. The deficiency
results from the non-cash, unrealized accounting loss recorded for the ACES of
$400 million for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and $1.1 billion for the
twelve months ended June 30, 1999. Excluding the ACES, the ratio of earnings
from continuing operations to fixed charges would have been 1.90 and 2.33 for
the six months and twelve months ended June 30, 1999, respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000048732
<NAME> RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE> PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT> 8,884,110
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST> 3,845,139
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS> 1,891,081
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES> 4,840,070
<OTHER-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 19,460,400
<COMMON> 2,950,552
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN> 0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS> 1,004,833
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ> 3,955,385
0
9,740
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET> 7,151,308
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES> 302,100
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE> 487,001
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS> 1,510,749
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT> 647,144
0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS> 13,129
<LEASES-CURRENT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB> 5,383,844
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB> 19,460,400
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE> 6,300,732
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE> (5,068)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES> 5,787,234
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES> 5,787,234
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS> 513,498
<OTHER-INCOME-NET> (377,132)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN> 136,366
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE> 276,364
<NET-INCOME> (134,930)
195
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM> (135,125)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS> 213,898
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS> 172,887
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS> 556,001
<EPS-BASIC> (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED> (0.47)
<FN>
<F1>TOTAL ANNUAL INTEREST CHARGES ON ALL BONDS IS AS OF YEAR-TO-DATE 06/30/99.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 99A
[ITEMS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE FROM THE COMPANY 10-K AND THE
COMPANY FIRST QUARTER 10-Q.]
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
(a) Company.
For a description of certain legal and regulatory proceedings affecting the
Company, see Notes 3(b), 12(h) and 12(i) to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, which notes are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM. 7 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
OF THE COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
Earnings for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future
earnings and results. The level of future earnings depends on numerous factors
including (i) the future growth in the Company's and its subsidiaries' energy
sales; (ii) weather; (iii) the success of the Company's and its subsidiaries'
entry into non-rate regulated businesses such as energy marketing and
international and domestic power projects; (iv) the Company's and its
subsidiaries' ability to respond to rapid changes in a competitive environment
and in the legislative and regulatory framework under which they have
traditionally operated; (v) rates of economic growth in the Company's and its
subsidiaries' service areas; (vi) the ability of the Company and its
subsidiaries to control costs and to maintain pricing structures that are both
attractive to customers and profitable; (vii) the outcome of future rate
proceedings; (viii) the effect that foreign exchange rate changes may have on
the Company's investments in international operations; and (ix) future
legislative initiatives.
In order to adapt to the increasingly competitive environment in which the
Company operates, the Company continues to evaluate a wide array of potential
business strategies, including business combinations or acquisitions involving
other utility or non-utility businesses or properties, internal restructuring,
reorganizations or dispositions of currently owned properties or currently
operating business units and new products, services and customer strategies. In
addition, the Company continues to engage in new business ventures, such as
electric power trading and marketing, which arise from competitive and
regulatory changes in the utility industry.
COMPETITION AND RESTRUCTURING OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY
The electric utility industry is becoming increasingly competitive due to
changing government regulations, technological developments and the availability
of alternative energy sources.
Long-Term Trends in Electric Utility Industry. The electric utility
industry historically has been composed of vertically integrated companies
providing electric service on an exclusive basis within governmentally-defined
geographic areas. Prices for electric service have typically been set by
governmental authorities under principles designed to provide the utility with
an opportunity to recover its cost of providing electric service plus a
reasonable return on its invested capital. Federal legislation and regulation as
well as legislative and regulatory initiatives in various states have encouraged
competition among electric utility and non-utility owned power generators. These
developments, combined with increased demand for lower-priced electricity and
technological advances in electric generation, have continued to move the
electric utility industry in the direction of more competition.
Based on a strategic review of the Company's business and of ongoing
developments in the electric utility and related industries regarding
competition, regulation and consolidation, the Company's management believes
that the electric utility industry will continue its path toward competition,
albeit on a state-by-state basis. The Company's management also believes the
business of electricity and natural gas are converging and consolidating and
these trends will alter the structure and business practices of companies
serving these markets in the future.
Competition in Wholesale Market. The Federal Energy Policy Act of 1992, the
Public Utility Regulatory Act of 1995 (now the Texas Utilities Code) and
regulations promulgated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
contain provisions intended to facilitate the development of a wholesale energy
market. Although Reliant Energy HL&P's wholesale sales traditionally have
accounted for less than 1% of its total revenues, the expansion of competition
in the wholesale electric market is significant in that it has increased the
range of non-utility competitors, such as exempt wholesale generators (EWGs) and
power marketers, in the Texas electric market as well as resulted in fundamental
changes in the operation of the state transmission grid.
In February 1996, the Texas Utility Commission adopted rules granting
third-party users of transmission systems open access to such systems at rates,
terms and conditions comparable to those available to utilities owning such
transmission assets. Under the Texas Utility Commission order implementing the
rule, Reliant Energy HL&P was required to separate, on an operational basis, its
wholesale power marketing operations from the operations of the transmission
grid and, for purposes of transmission pricing, to disclose each of its separate
costs of generation, transmission and distribution.
Within ERCOT, an independent system operator (ISO) manages the state's
electric grid, ensuring system reliability and providing non-discriminatory
transmission access to all power producers and traders. The ERCOT ISO, the first
in the nation, is a key component for implementing the Texas Utility
Commission's overall strategy to create a
<PAGE> 2
competitive wholesale market. ERCOT formed an ad hoc committee in early 1998 to
investigate the potential impacts of a competitive retail market on the ISO. The
ERCOT committee report was released in December 1998 and concluded that the
ISO's role and function would necessarily expand in a competitive retail
environment, but the changes required of the ISO to support retail choice should
not impede introduction of retail choice.
Competition in Retail Market. The Company estimates that, since 1978,
cogeneration projects representing approximately one-third of current total peak
generating capability have been built in the Houston area and that, as a result,
Reliant Energy HL&P has seen a reduction of approximately 2,500 MW in customer
load to self-generation. Reliant Energy HL&P has utilized flexible pricing to
respond to situations where large industrial customers have an alternative to
buying power from it, primarily by constructing their own generating facilities.
Under a tariff option approved by the Texas Utility Commission in 1995, Reliant
Energy HL&P was permitted to implement contracts based upon flexible pricing for
up to 700 MW. Currently, this rate is fully subscribed.
Texas law currently does not permit retail sales by unregulated entities
such as cogenerators. The Company anticipates that cogenerators and other
interests will continue to exert pressure to obtain access to the electric
transmission and distribution systems of regulated utilities for the purpose of
making retail sales to customers of regulated utilities.
Legislative Proposals. A number of proposals to restructure the electric
utility industry have been introduced in the 1999 session of the Texas
legislature. If adopted, legislation may permit and encourage alternative
suppliers to compete to serve Reliant Energy HL&P's current rate-regulated
retail customers. The various legislative proposals include provisions governing
recovery of stranded costs and permitting securitization of those costs;
freezing rates until 2002; requiring firm sales of energy to competing retail
electric providers; requiring disaggregation of generation, transmission and
distribution, and retail sales into separate companies and limiting the ability
of existing utilities' affiliates competing for retail electric customers on the
basis of price until they have lost a substantial percentage of their
residential and small commercial load to alternative retail providers. In
addition to the Texas legislative proposals, a number of federal legislative
proposals to promote retail electric competition or restructure the U.S.
electric utility industry have been introduced during the current congressional
session.
At this time, the Company is unable to make any prediction as to whether
any legislation to restructure electric operations or provide retail competition
will be enacted or as to the content or impact on the Company of any legislation
which may be enacted. However, because the proposed legislation is intended to
fundamentally restructure electric utility operations, it is likely that enacted
legislation would have a material impact on the Company.
Stranded Costs. As the U.S. electric utility industry continues its
transition to a more competitive environment, a substantial amount of fixed
costs previously approved for recovery under traditional utility regulatory
practices (including regulatory assets and liabilities) may become "stranded,"
i.e., unrecoverable at competitive market prices. The issue of stranded costs
could be particularly significant with respect to fixed costs incurred in
connection with the past construction of generation plants, such as nuclear
power plants, which, because of their high fixed costs, would not command the
same price for their output as they have in a regulated environment.
In January 1997, the Texas Utility Commission delivered a report to the
Texas legislature on stranded investments in the electric utility industry in
Texas (referred to by the Texas Utility Commission as "Excess Cost Over Market")
(ECOM). In April 1998, the Texas Utility Commission submitted to the Texas
Senate Interim Committee on Electric Utility Restructuring an updated study of
ECOM estimates. Assuming that retail competition is adopted at the beginning of
2002, the updated study estimated that the total amount of stranded costs for
all Texas electric utilities could be $4.5 billion. If instead, retail
competition is adopted one year later, the study estimates statewide ECOM to be
$3.3 billion. Estimates of ECOM vary widely and there is inherent uncertainty in
calculating these costs.
Transition Plan. In June 1998, the Texas Utility Commission approved the
Transition Plan filed by Reliant Energy HL&P in December 1997. The Transition
Plan included base rate credits to residential and certain commercial
2
<PAGE> 3
customers in 1998 and 1999, an overall rate of return cap formula for 1998 and
1999 and approval of accounting procedures designed to accelerate recovery of
stranded costs which may arise under restructuring legislation. The Transition
Plan permits the redirection of depreciation expense to generation assets that
Electric Operations otherwise would apply to transmission, distribution and
general plant assets. In addition, the Transition Plan provides that all
earnings above a 9.844% overall annual rate of return on invested capital be
used to recover Electric Operations' investment in generation assets. In
1998, Reliant Energy HL&P recorded an additional $194 million in depreciation
under the Transition Plan. Certain parties have appealed the order approving the
Transition Plan. For additional information, see Notes 1(f) and 3(b) to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
COMPETITION -- OTHER OPERATIONs
Natural Gas Distribution competes primarily with alternate energy sources
such as electricity and other fuel sources as well as with providers of energy
conservation products. In addition, as a result of federal regulatory changes
affecting interstate pipelines, it has become possible for other natural gas
suppliers and distributors to bypass Natural Gas Distribution's facilities and
market, sell and/or transport natural gas directly to small commercial and/or
large volume customers.
The Interstate Pipeline segment competes with other interstate and
intrastate pipelines in the transportation and storage of natural gas. The
principal elements of competition among pipelines are rates, terms of service,
and flexibility and reliability of service. Interstate Pipeline competes
indirectly with other forms of energy available to its customers, including
electricity, coal and fuel oils. The primary competitive factor is price.
Changes in the availability of energy and pipeline capacity, the level of
business activity, conservation and governmental regulations, the capability to
convert to alternative fuels, and other factors, including weather, affect the
demand for natural gas in areas served by Interstate Pipeline and the level of
competition for transport and storage services.
Reliant Energy Services competes for sales in its gas and power trading and
marketing business with other natural gas and power merchants, producers and
pipelines based on its ability to aggregate supplies at competitive prices from
different sources and locations and to efficiently utilize transportation from
third-party pipelines and transmission from electric utilities. Reliant Energy
Services also competes against other energy marketers on the basis of its
relative financial position and access to credit sources. This competitive
factor reflects the tendency of energy customers, natural gas suppliers and
natural gas transporters to seek financial guarantees and other assurances that
their energy contracts will be satisfied. As pricing information becomes
increasingly available in the energy trading and marketing business and as
deregulation in the electricity markets continues to accelerate, the Company
anticipates that Reliant Energy Services will experience greater competition and
downward pressure on per-unit profit margins in the energy marketing industry.
Competition for acquisition of international and domestic non-rate
regulated power projects is intense. International and Power Generation compete
against a number of other participants in the non-utility power generation
industry, some of which have greater financial resources and have been engaged
in non-utility power projects for periods longer than the Company and have
accumulated greater portfolios of projects. Competitive factors relevant to the
non-utility power industry include financial resources, access to non-recourse
funding and regulatory factors.
FLUCTUATIONS IN COMMODITY PRICES AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
For information regarding the Company's exposure to risk as a result of
fluctuations in commodity prices and derivative instruments, see "Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in Item 7A of this Report.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ACES
The Company accounts for its investment in Time Warner Convertible
Preferred Stock (TW Preferred) under the cost method. As a result of the
Company's issuance of the ACES, a portion of the increase in the market value
above $27.7922 per share of Time Warner common stock (the security into which
the TW Preferred is convertible) (TW
3
<PAGE> 4
Common) results in unrealized accounting losses to the Company, pending the
conversion of the Company's TW Preferred into TW Common. For consistency
purposes, the TW Common and related per share prices retroactively reflect a 2
for 1 stock split effective December 15, 1998.
Prior to the conversion of the TW Preferred into TW Common, when the market
price of TW Common increases above $27.7922, the Company records in Other Income
(Expense) an unrealized, non-cash accounting loss for the ACES equal to the
aggregate amount of such increase as applicable to all ACES multiplied by
0.8264. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, this
accounting loss (which reflects the unrealized increase in the Company's
indebtedness with respect to the ACES) may not be offset by accounting
recognition of the increase in the market value of the TW Common that underlies
the TW Preferred. Upon conversion of the TW Preferred (which is anticipated to
occur in June 1999 when the preferential dividend on the TW Preferred expires),
the Company will begin recording future unrealized net changes in the market
prices of the TW Common and the ACES as a component of common stock equity and
other comprehensive income.
As of December 31, 1998, the market price of TW Common was $62.062 per
share. Accordingly, the Company recognized an increase of $1.2 billion in 1998
in the unrealized liability relating to its ACES indebtedness (which resulted in
an after-tax earnings reduction of $764 million or $2.69 basic earnings per
share in 1998). The Company believes that the cumulative unrealized loss for the
ACES of approximately $1.3 billion is more than economically offset by the
approximately $1.8 billion unrecorded unrealized gain at December 31, 1998
relating to the increase in the fair value of the TW Common underlying the
investment in TW Preferred since the date of its acquisition. Any gain related
to the increase in fair value of TW Common would be recognized as a component of
net income upon the sale of the TW Preferred or the shares of TW Common into
which such TW Preferred is converted. As of March 11, 1999, the price of TW
Common was $70.75 per share, which would have resulted in the Company
recognizing an additional increase of $329 million in the unrealized liability
represented by its indebtedness under the ACES. The related unrecorded
unrealized gain as of March 11, 1999 would have been computed as an additional
$398 million.
Excluding the unrealized, non-cash accounting loss for ACES, the Company's
retained earnings and total common stock equity would have been $2.3 billion and
$5.2 billion, respectively.
IMPACT OF THE YEAR 2000 ISSUE AND OTHER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Year 2000 Problem. At midnight on December 31, 1999, unless the proper
modifications have been made, the program logic in many of the world's computer
systems will start to produce erroneous results because, among other things, the
systems will incorrectly read the date "01/01/00" as being January 1 of the year
1900 or another incorrect date. In addition, certain systems may fail to detect
that the year 2000 is a leap year. Problems can also arise earlier than January
1, 2000, as dates in the next millennium are entered into non-Year 2000
compliant programs.
Compliance Program. In 1997, the Company initiated a corporate-wide Year
2000 project to address mainframe application systems, information technology
(IT) related equipment, system software, client-developed applications, building
controls and non-IT embedded systems such as process controls for energy
production and delivery. Incorporated into this project were Resources' and
other Company subsidiaries' mainframe applications, infrastructures, embedded
systems and client-developed applications that will not be migrated into
existing or planned Company or Resources systems prior to the year 2000. The
evaluation of Year 2000 issues included those related to significant customers,
key vendors, service suppliers and other parties material to the Company's and
its subsidiaries' operations. In the course of this evaluation, the Company has
sought written assurances from such third parties as to their state of Year 2000
readiness.
State of Readiness. Work has been prioritized in accordance with business
risk. The highest priority has been assigned to activities that would disrupt
the physical delivery of energy (Priority 1); activities that would impact back
office activities such as billing (Priority 2); activities that would cause
inconvenience or productivity loss in normal business operations (e.g. air
conditioning systems and elevators) (Priority 3). All business units have
completed an analysis of critical systems and equipment that control the
production and delivery of energy, as well as corporate, departmental and
personnel systems and equipment. The remediation and replacement work on the
majority of IT
4
<PAGE> 5
systems, non-IT systems and infrastructure began in the first quarter of 1998
and is expected to be completed by the second quarter of 1999. Testing of these
systems began in the second quarter of 1998 and is scheduled to be completed in
third quarter of 1999. The following table illustrates the Company's completion
percentages for the Year 2000 activities as of February 28, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3
-------------- -------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Assessment.............................................. 95% 86% 96%
Conversion.............................................. 86% 70% 91%
Testing................................................. 80% 61% 87%
Implementation.......................................... 76% 54% 75%
</TABLE>
Costs to Address Year 2000 Compliance Issues. Based on current internal
studies, as well as recently solicited bids from various computer software
vendors, the Company estimates that the total direct cost of resolving the Year
2000 issue with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries will be between $35
and $40 million. This estimate includes approximately $7 million related to
salaries and expenses of existing employees and approximately $3 million in
hardware purchases that the Company expects to capitalize. In addition, the $35
to $40 million estimate includes approximately $2 million spent prior to 1998
and approximately $12 million during 1998. The remaining costs related to
resolving the Year 2000 issue are expected to be expended in 1999.
The Company expects to fund these expenditures through internal sources.
In September 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with SAP America,
Inc. (SAP) to license SAP proprietary R/3 enterprise software. The licensed
software includes customer care, finance and accounting, human resources,
materials management and service delivery components. The Company's purchase of
this software license and related computer hardware is part of its response to
changes in the electric utility and energy services industries, as well as
changes in the Company's businesses and operations resulting from the
acquisition of Resources and the Company's expansion into the energy trading and
marketing business. Although it is anticipated that the implementation of the
SAP system will have the incidental effect of negating the need to modify many
of the Company's computer systems to accommodate the Year 2000 problem, the
Company does not deem the costs of the SAP system as directly related to its
Year 2000 compliance program. Portions of the SAP system were implemented in
December 1998 and March 1999, and it is expected that the final portion of the
SAP system will be fully implemented by July 2000. The estimated costs of
implementing the SAP system is approximately $182 million, inclusive of internal
costs. In 1998, the Company and its subsidiaries spent $108 million of such
costs. In 1999, the Company and its subsidiaries expect to spend $59 million
with the remaining amounts to be spent in 2000.
The estimated Year 2000 project costs do not give effect to any future
corporate acquisitions or divestitures made by the Company or its subsidiaries.
Risks and Contingency Plans. The major systems which pose the greatest Year
2000 risks for the Company and its subsidiaries if implementation of the Year
2000 compliance program is not successful are the process control systems for
energy delivery systems; the time in use, demand and recorder metering system
for commercial and industrial customers; the outage analysis system; and the
power billing systems. The potential problems related to these systems are
temporary electric service interruptions to customers, temporary interruptions
in revenue data gathering and temporary poor customer relations resulting from
delayed billing. Although the Company does not believe that this scenario will
occur, the Company has considerable experience responding to emergency
situations, including computer failure. Existing emergency operations, disaster
recovery and business continuation plans are being enhanced to ensure
preparedness and to mitigate the long-term effect of such a scenario.
The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) is coordinating
electric utility industry contingency planning on a national level. Additional
contingency planning is being done at the regional electric reliability council
level. Reliant Energy HL&P filed a draft Year 2000 Contingency Plan with NERC
and with the Texas Utility Commission in December 1998. The draft plan addresses
restoration of electric service and related business processes, and is designed
to work in conjunction with the Emergency Operating Plan and with the plans of
NERC and ERCOT.
5
<PAGE> 6
A final contingency plan is scheduled to be complete by June 30, 1999. In
addition, Reliant Energy HL&P will participate in industry preparedness drills,
such as the two NERC drills scheduled to be held on April 9, 1999 and September
9, 1999.
The existing business continuity disaster recovery and emergency operations
plans are being reviewed and enhanced, and where necessary, additional plans
will be developed to include mitigation strategies and action plans specifically
addressing potential Year 2000 scenarios. The expected completion date for these
plans is June 30, 1999.
In order to assist in preparing for and mitigating the foregoing scenarios,
the Company intends to complete all mission critical Year 2000 remediation and
testing activity by the end of the second quarter of 1999. In addition, the
Company has initiated Year 2000 communications with significant customers, key
vendors, service suppliers and other parties material to the Company's
operations and is diligently monitoring the progress of such third parties' Year
2000 projects. The Company expects to meet with mission-critical third parties,
including suppliers, in order to ascertain and assess the relative risks of
Year-2000-related issues, and to mitigate such risks. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Company cautions that (i) the nature of testing is such that it
cannot comprehensively address all future combinations of dates and events and
(ii) it is impossible for the Company to assess with precision or certainty the
compliance of third parties with Year 2000 remediation efforts. Due to the
speculative and uncertain nature of contingency planning, there can be no
assurance that such plans actually will be sufficient to reduce the risk of
material impacts on the Company's and its subsidiaries' operations.
RISKS OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
The Company's international operations are subject to various risks
incidental to investing or operating in emerging market countries. These risks
include political risks, such as governmental instability, and economic risks,
such as fluctuations in currency exchange rates, restrictions on the
repatriation of foreign earnings and/or restrictions on the conversion of local
currency earnings into U.S. dollars. The Company's international operations are
also highly capital intensive and, thus, dependent to a significant extent on
the continued availability of bank financing and other sources of capital on
commercially acceptable terms.
Impact of Currency Fluctuations on Company Earnings. The Company, through
Reliant Energy International's subsidiaries, owns 11.69% of the stock of Light
and, through its investment in Light, an 8.753% interest in the stock of
Metropolitana Electricidade de Sao Paulo S.A. (Metropolitana). The Company
accounts for its investment in Light under the equity method of accounting and
records its proportionate share, based on stock ownership, in the net income of
Light and its affiliates (including Metropolitana) as part of the Company's
consolidated net income.
At December 31, 1998, Light and Metropolitana had total borrowings of
approximately $3.2 billion denominated in non-local currencies. Because of the
devaluation of the Brazilian real subsequent to December 31, 1998, Light and
Metropolitana are expected to record a charge to March 31, 1999 earnings that
reflects the increase in the liability represented by their non-local currency
denominated bank borrowings relative to the Brazilian real. Because the Company
uses the Brazilian real as the functional currency in which it reports Light's
equity earnings, the resulting decrease in Light's earnings will also be
reflected in the Company's consolidated earnings to the extent of the Company's
11.69% ownership interest in Light. At December 31, 1998, one U. S. dollar could
be exchanged for 1.21 Brazilian reais. Using the exchange rate of 2.06 Brazilian
reais in effect at the end of February, and the average exchange rate in effect
since the end of the year, the Company estimates that its share of the after-tax
charge to be recorded by Light would be approximately $125 million. This
estimate does not reflect the possibility of additional fluctuations in the
exchange rate and does not include other non-debt-related impacts of Brazil's
currency devaluation on Light's and Metropolitana's future earnings.
6
<PAGE> 7
None of Light's or Metropolitana's tariff adjustment mechanisms are
directly indexed to the U.S. dollar or other non-local currencies. Each company
currently is evaluating various options including regulatory rate relief to
mitigate the impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real. For example, the
long-term concession contracts under which Light and Metropolitana operate
contain mechanisms for adjusting electricity tariffs to reflect changes in
operating costs resulting from inflation. If the devaluation of the Brazilian
real results in an increase in the local rate of inflation and if an adjustment
to tariff rates is made promptly to reflect such increase, the Company believes
that the financial results of Light and Metropolitana should be protected, at
least in part, from the effects of devaluation. However, there can be no
assurance the implementation of such tariff adjustments will be timely or that
the economic impact of the devaluation will be completely reflected in increased
inflation rates.
Certain of Reliant Energy International's other foreign electric
distribution companies have incurred U.S. dollar and other non-local currency
indebtedness (approximately $71 million at December 31, 1998). For further
analysis of foreign currency fluctuations in the Company's earnings and cash
flows, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk --
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk" in Item 7A of this Form 10-K.
Impact of Foreign Currency Devaluation on Project Capital Resources. In the
first quarter of 1999, approximately $117 million of Metropolitana's U.S. dollar
denominated debt will mature. In the second quarter of 1999, approximately $980
million of Light's and approximately $696 million of Metropolitana's U.S. and
non-local currency denominated bank debt will mature. In March 1999, Light
refinanced approximately $130 million of its U.S. dollar denominated debt
through a local - currency denominated loan. The ability of Light and
Metropolitana to repay or refinance their debt obligations at maturity is
dependent on many factors, including local and international economic conditions
prevailing at the time such debt matures.
If economic conditions in the international markets continue to be
unsettled or deteriorate, it is possible that Light, Metropolitana and the other
foreign electric distribution companies in which the Company holds investments
might encounter difficulties in refinancing their debt (both local currency and
non-local currency borrowings) on terms and conditions that are commercially
acceptable to them and their shareholders. In such circumstances, in lieu of
declaring a default or extending the maturity, it is possible that lenders might
seek to require, among other things, higher borrowing rates, and additional
equity contributions and/or increased levels of credit support from the
shareholders of such entities. The availability or terms of refinancing such
debt cannot be assured.
Currency fluctuation and instability affecting Latin America may also
adversely affect Reliant Energy International's ability to refinance its equity
investments with debt. In 1998, Reliant Energy International invested $411
million in Colombia and El Salvador. As of January 1999, $100 million of these
investments were refinanced with debt. Reliant Energy International intends to
refinance approximately $75 million more of such initial investments with debt.
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPENDITURES
The Company and its subsidiaries, including Resources, are subject to
numerous environmental laws and regulations, which require them to incur
substantial costs to operate existing facilities, construct and operate new
facilities, and mitigate or remove the effect of past operations on the
environment.
Clean Air Act Expenditures. The Company expects the majority of capital
expenditures associated with environmental matters to be incurred by Electric
Operations in connection with new emission limitations under the Federal Clean
Air Act (Clean Air Act) for oxides of nitrogen (NOx). The standards applicable
to Electric Operations' generating units in the Houston, Texas area will become
effective in November 1999. NOx reduction costs incurred by Electric Operations
totaled approximately $7 million in 1998. The Company estimates that Electric
Operations will incur approximately $8 million in 1999 and $10 million in 2000
for such expenditures. The Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission
(TNRCC) has indicated that additional NOx reduction will be required after 2000;
however, since the magnitude and timing of these reductions have not yet been
established, it is impossible for the Company to estimate a reasonable range of
such expenditures at this time.
7
<PAGE> 8
In 1998, the Wholesale Energy spent approximately $100,000 in order to
comply with NOx reduction with respect to Southern California generating
facilities acquired by Power Generation from Southern California Edison (SCE) in
1998. In 1999, based on existing requirements, the Company projects that it will
spend an additional $100,000 on NOx reduction standards with respect to such
plants and approximately $1 million on continuous emission monitoring system
upgrades for such plants.
Site Remediation Expenditures. From time to time the Company and its
subsidiaries have received notices from regulatory authorities or others
regarding their status as potentially responsible parties in connection with
sites found to require remediation due to the presence of environmental
contaminants.
The Company's identified sites with respect to which it may be claimed to
have a remediation liability include several sites for which there is a lack of
current available information, including the nature and magnitude of
contamination, and the extent, if any, to which the Company may be held
responsible for contributing to any costs incurred for remediating these sites.
Thus, no reasonable estimate of cleanup costs can now be made for these sites.
Based on currently available information, the Company believes that such costs
ultimately will not materially affect its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance, however, that future
developments, including additional information about existing sites or the
identification of new sites, will not require material revisions to such
estimates. For information about specific sites that are the subject of
remediation claims, see Note 12(h) to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements and Note 8(g) to Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements, each
of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Mercury Contamination. Like other natural gas pipelines, Resources'
pipeline operations have in the past employed elemental mercury in meters used
on its pipelines. Although the mercury has now been removed from the meters, it
is possible that small amounts of mercury have been spilled at some of those
sites in the course of normal maintenance and replacement operations and that
such spills have contaminated the immediate area around the meters with
elemental mercury. Such contamination has been found by Resources at some sites
in the past, and Resources has conducted remediation at sites found to be
contaminated. Although Resources is not aware of additional specific sites, it
is possible that other contaminated sites exist and that remediation costs will
be incurred for such sites. Although the total amount of such costs cannot be
known at this time, based on experience of Resources and others in the natural
gas industry to date and on the current regulations regarding remediation of
such sites, the Company and Resources believe that the cost of any remediation
of such sites will not be material to the Company's or Resources' financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other. In addition, the Company has been named as a defendant in litigation
related to such sites and in recent years has been named, along with numerous
others, as a defendant in several lawsuits filed by a large number of
individuals who claim injury due to exposure to asbestos while working at sites
along the Texas Gulf Coast. Most of these claimants have been workers who
participated in construction of various industrial facilities, including power
plants, and some of the claimants have worked at locations owned by the Company.
The Company anticipates that additional claims like those received may be
asserted in the future and intends to continue its practice of vigorously
contesting claims which it does not consider to have merit. Although their
ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, the Company does not believe,
based on its experience to date, that these matters, either individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
OTHER CONTINGENCIES
For a description of certain other legal and regulatory proceedings
affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, see Notes 3, 4, 5 and 12 to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 8 to Resources'
Consolidated Financial Statements, which notes are incorporated herein by
reference.
8
<PAGE> 9
NEW ACCOUNTING ISSUES
In 1998, the Company and Resources adopted SFAS No. 130, "Reporting
Comprehensive Income" (SFAS No. 130), SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS No. 131) and SFAS No. 132,
"Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits" (SFAS
No. 132). For further discussion of these accounting statements, see Note 15 to
the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 9 to Resources'
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2000, the Company and Resources expect to adopt SFAS No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133),
which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
(collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. The
Company is in the process of determining the effect of adoption of SFAS No. 133
on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 1998, The Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board reached consensus on Issue 98-10, "Accounting for
Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" (EITF Issue
98-10). EITF Issue 98-10 requires energy trading contracts to be recorded at
fair value on the balance sheet, with the changes in fair value included in
earnings. EITF Issue 98-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 1998. The Company expects to adopt EITF Issue 98-10 in the first
quarter of 1999. The Company does not expect the implementation of EITF Issue
98-10 to be material to its consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company and its subsidiaries have long-term debt, Company/ Resources
obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts
holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company/Resources (Trust
Securities), securities held in the Company's nuclear decommissioning trust,
bank facilities, certain lease obligations and interest rate swaps which subject
the Company, Resources and certain of their subsidiaries to the risk of loss
associated with movements in market interest rates.
At December 31, 1998, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries had
issued fixed-rate long-term debt (excluding ACES) and Trust Securities
aggregating $5.0 billion in principal amount and having a fair value of $5.2
billion. These instruments are fixed-rate and, therefore, do not expose the
Company and its subsidiaries to the risk of earnings loss due to changes in
market interest rates (see Notes 8 and 9 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements). However, the fair value of these instruments would increase by
approximately $260.6 million if interest rates were to decline by 10% from their
levels at December 31, 1998. In general, such an increase in fair value would
impact earnings and cash flows only if the Company and its subsidiaries were to
reacquire all or a portion of these instruments in the open market prior to
their maturity.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries' floating-rate obligations
aggregated $1.8 billion at December 31, 1998 (see Note 8 to the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements), inclusive of (i) amounts borrowed under
short-term and long-term credit facilities of the Company and its subsidiaries
(including the issuance of commercial paper supported by such facilities), (ii)
borrowings underlying Resources' receivables facility and (iii) amounts subject
to a master leasing agreement of Resources under which lease payments vary
depending on short-term interest rates. These floating-rate obligations expose
the Company, Resources and their subsidiaries to the risk of increased interest
and lease expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If the
floating rates were to increase by 10% from December 31, 1998 levels, the
Company's consolidated interest expense and expense under operating leases would
increase by a total of approximately $0.9 million each month in which such
increase continued.
As discussed in Notes 1(o), 4(c) and 13 to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements, the Company contributes $14.8 million per year to a trust
established to fund the Company's share of the decommissioning costs for the
South Texas Project. The securities held by the trust for decommissioning costs
had an estimated fair value of $119.1 million as of December 31, 1998, of which
approximately 44% were fixed-rate debt securities that subject the Company to
risk of loss of fair value with movements in market interest rates. If interest
rates were to increase by 10% from their levels at December 31, 1998, the
decrease in fair value of the fixed-rate debt securities would not be material
to the Company. In addition, the risk of an economic loss is mitigated at this
time as a result of the Company's regulated status. Any unrealized gains or
losses are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 71 as a regulatory
asset/liability because the Company believes that its future contributions which
are currently recovered through the rate-making process will be adjusted for
these gains and losses.
Certain subsidiaries of the Company have entered into interest rate swaps
for the purpose of decreasing the amount of debt subject to interest rate
fluctuations. At December 31, 1998, these interest rate swaps had an aggregate
notional amount of $75.4 million, which the Company could terminate at a cost of
$3.2 million (see Notes 2 and 13 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements). An increase of 10% in the December 31, 1998 level of interest rates
would not increase the cost of termination of the swaps by a material amount to
the Company. Swap termination costs would impact the Company's and its
subsidiaries' earnings and cash flows only if all or a portion of the swap
instruments were terminated prior to their expiration.
12
<PAGE> 10
As discussed in Note 8(h) to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, Resources sold $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 6 3/8%
TERM Notes which included an embedded option to remarket the securities. The
option is expected to be exercised in the event that the ten-year Treasury rate
in 2003 is below 5.66%. At December 31, 1998, the Company could terminate the
option at a cost of $30.7 million. A decrease of 10% in the December 31, 1998
level of interest rates would not increase the cost of termination of the option
by a material amount to the Company.
The change in exposure to loss in earnings and cash flows related to
interest rate risk from December 31, 1997 to December 31, 1998 is not material
to the Company.
EQUITY MARKET RISK
The Company holds an investment in TW Preferred which is convertible into
Time Warner common stock (TW Common) as described in "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company --
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries --
Accounting Treatment of ACES" in Item 7 of this Form 10-K. As a result, the
Company is exposed to losses in the fair value of this security. For purposes of
analyzing market risk in this Item 7A, the Company assumed that the TW Preferred
was converted into TW Common. In addition, Resources' investment in the common
stock of Itron, Inc. (Itron) exposes the Company and Resources to losses in the
fair value of Itron common stock. A 10% decline in the market value per share of
TW Common and Itron common stock from the December 31, 1998 levels would result
in a loss in fair value of approximately $284.4 million and $1.1 million,
respectively.
The Company's and its subsidiaries' ability to realize gains and losses
related to the TW Preferred and the Itron common stock is limited by the
following: (i) the TW Preferred is not publicly traded and its sale is subject
to certain limitations and (ii) the market for the common stock of Itron is
fairly illiquid.
The ACES expose the Company to accounting losses as the Company is required
to record in Other Income (Expense) an unrealized accounting loss equal to (i)
the aggregate amount of the increase in the market price of TW Common above
$27.7922 as applicable to all ACES multiplied by (ii) 0.8264. Prior to the
conversion of the TW Preferred into TW Common, such loss would affect earnings.
After conversion, such loss would be recognized as an adjustment to common stock
equity through a reduction of other comprehensive income. However, there would
be an offsetting increase in common stock equity through an increase in
accumulated other comprehensive income on the Company's Statements of
Consolidated Retained Earnings and Comprehensive Income for the fair value
increase in the investment in TW Common. For additional information on the
accounting treatment of the ACES and related accounting losses recorded in 1998,
see Note 1(n) to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. An increase of
15% in the price of the TW Common above its December 31, 1998 market value of
$62.062 per share would result in the recognition of an additional unrealized
accounting loss (net of tax) of approximately $229.1 million. The Company
believes that this additional unrealized loss for the ACES would be more than
economically hedged by the unrecorded unrealized gain relating to the increase
in the fair value of the TW Common underlying the investment in TW Preferred
since the date of its acquisition.
For a discussion of the non-cash, unrealized accounting loss recorded in
1998 and 1997 related to the ACES, see "-- Certain Factors Affecting Future
Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries -- Accounting Treatment of ACES" in
Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
As discussed above under "-- Interest Rate Risk," the Company contributes
to a trust established to fund the Company's share of the decommissioning costs
for the South Texas Project which held debt and equity securities as of December
31, 1998. The equity securities expose the Company to losses in fair value. If
the market prices of the individual equity securities were to decrease by 10%
from their levels at December 31, 1998, the resulting loss in fair value of
these securities would not be material to the Company. Currently, the risk of an
economic loss is mitigated as a result of the Company's regulated status as
discussed above under "--Interest Rate Risk."
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK
As further described in "Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the
Company and Its Subsidiaries -- Risks of International Operations" in Item 7 of
this Form 10-K, the Company, through Reliant Energy International invests in
certain foreign operations which to date have been primarily in South America.
As of December 31, 1998, the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected
$1.1 billion of foreign investments, a substantial portion of which represent
investments accounted for under the equity method. These foreign investments
expose the Company to risk of loss in earnings and cash flows due to the
fluctuation in foreign currencies relative to the Company's consolidated
reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. The Company accounts for adjustments
resulting from translation of its investments with functional currencies other
than the U.S. dollar as a charge or credit directly to a separate component of
stockholders' equity. For further discussion of the accounting for foreign
currency adjustments, see Note 1(p) in the Notes to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements. The cumulative translation loss of $34 million, recorded
as of December 31, 1998, will be realized as a loss in earnings and cash flows
only upon the disposition of the related investment. The foreign currency loss
in earnings and cash flows related to debt obligations held by foreign
operations in currencies other than their own functional currencies was not
material to the Company as of December 31, 1997.
13
<PAGE> 11
In addition, certain of Reliant Energy International's foreign operations
have entered into obligations in currencies other than their own functional
currencies which expose the Company to a loss in earnings. In such cases, as the
respective investment's functional currency devalues relative to the non-local
currencies, the Company will record its proportionate share of its investments'
foreign currency transaction losses related to the non-local currency
denominated debt. At December 31, 1998, Light and Metropolitana had borrowings
of approximately $3.2 billion denominated in non-local currencies. Because of
the devaluation of the Brazilian real subsequent to December 31, 1998, Light and
Metropolitana are expected to record a charge to earnings for the quarter ended
March 31, 1999, primarily related to foreign currency transaction losses on
their non-local currency denominated debt. For further discussion and analysis
of the possible effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, see
"Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and Its Subsidiaries
- -- Risks of International Operations" in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
The company attempts to manage and mitigate this foreign risk by properly
balancing the higher cost of financing with local denominated debt against the
risk of devaluation of that local currency and including a measure of the risk
of devaluation in all its financial plans. In addition, where possible, Reliant
Energy International attempts to structure its tariffs and revenue contracts to
ensure some measure of adjustment due to changes in inflation and currency
exchange rates; however, there can be no assurance that such efforts will
compensate for the full effect of currency devaluation, if any.
ENERGY COMMODITY PRICE RISK
As further described in Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, certain of the Company's subsidiaries utilize a variety of
derivative financial instruments (Derivatives), including swaps and
exchange-traded futures and options, as part of the Company's overall hedging
strategies and for trading purposes. To reduce the risk from the adverse effect
of market fluctuations in the price of electric power, natural gas, crude oil
and refined products and related transportation, Resources and certain
subsidiaries of the Company and Resources enter into futures transactions,
forward contracts, swaps and options (Energy Derivatives) in order to hedge
certain commodities in storage, as well as certain expected purchases, sales and
transportation of energy commodities (a portion of which are firm commitments at
the inception of the hedge). The Company's policies prohibit the use of
leveraged financial instruments. In addition, Reliant Energy Services, a
subsidiary of Resources, maintains a portfolio of Energy Derivatives to provide
price risk management services and for trading purposes (Trading Derivatives).
The Company uses value-at-risk and a sensitivity analysis method for
assessing the market risk of its derivatives.
With respect to the Energy Derivatives (other than Trading Derivatives)
held by subsidiaries of the Company and Resources as of December 31, 1998, a
decrease of 10% in the market prices of natural gas and electric power from
year-end levels would decrease the fair value of these instruments by
approximately $3 million. As of December 31, 1997, a decrease of 10% in the
prices of natural gas would have resulted in a loss of $7 million in fair values
of the Energy Derivatives (other than for trading purposes).
The above analysis of the Energy Derivatives utilized for hedging purposes
does not include the favorable impact that the same hypothetical price movement
would have on the Company's and its subsidiaries' physical purchases and sales
of natural gas and electric power to which the hedges relate. The portfolio of
Energy Derivatives held for hedging purposes is no greater than the notional
quantity of the expected or committed transaction volume of physical commodities
with equal and opposite commodity price risk for the same time periods.
Furthermore, the Energy Derivative portfolio is managed to complement the
physical transaction portfolio, reducing overall risks within limits. Therefore,
the adverse impact to the fair value of the portfolio of Energy Derivatives held
for hedging purposes associated with the hypothetical changes in commodity
prices referenced above would be offset by a favorable impact on the underlying
hedged physical transactions, assuming (i) the Energy Derivatives are not closed
out in advance of their expected term, (ii) the Energy Derivatives continue to
function effectively as hedges of the underlying risk and (iii) as applicable,
anticipated transactions occur as expected.
The disclosure with respect to the Energy Derivatives relies on the
assumption that the contracts will exist parallel to the underlying physical
transactions. If the underlying transactions or positions are liquidated prior
to the maturity of the Energy Derivatives, a loss on the financial instruments
may occur, or the options might be worthless as determined by the prevailing
market value on their termination or maturity date, whichever comes first.
With respect to the Trading Derivatives held by Reliant Energy Services,
consisting of natural gas, electric power, crude oil and refined products,
physical forwards, swaps, options and exchange-traded futures, this subsidiary
is exposed to losses in fair value due to changes in the price and volatility of
the underlying derivatives. During the year ended December 31, 1998 and 1997,
the highest, lowest and average monthly value-at-risk in the Trading Derivative
portfolio was less than $5 million at a 95% confidence level and for a holding
period of one business day. The Company uses the variance/covariance method for
calculating the value-at-risk and includes the delta approximation for options
positions.
The Company has established a Corporate Risk Oversight Committee comprised
of corporate and business segment officers that oversees all corporate price and
credit risk activities, including derivative trading activities discussed above.
The committee's duties are to establish the Company's policies and to monitor
and ensure compliance with risk management policies and procedures and the
trading limits established by the Company's board of directors.
14
<PAGE> 12
COMPANY 10-K NOTES
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(c) Regulatory Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets.
The Company and certain subsidiaries of Resources apply the accounting
policies established in SFAS No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain
Types of Regulation" (SFAS No. 71), to the accounts of Electric Operations,
Natural Gas Distribution and the Interstate Pipeline operations of a subsidiary
of Resources. In general, SFAS No. 71 permits a company with cost-based rates to
defer certain costs that would otherwise be expensed to the extent that the rate
regulated company is recovering or expects to recover such costs in rates
charged to its customers.
The following is a list of regulatory assets/liabilities reflected on the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998, detailed by
Electric Operations and other segments.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRIC TOTAL
OPERATIONS OTHER COMPANY
---------- ----- -------
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Deferred plant costs-- net............................................ $ 536 $ $ 536
Recoverable project costs-- net....................................... 55 55
Regulatory tax asset-- net............................................ 418 418
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt................................... 140 140
Fuel-related debits/credits-- net..................................... (15) (15)
Other deferred debits................................................. 54 12 66
--------- -------- --------
Total....................................................... $ 1,188 $ 12 $ 1,200
--------- -------- --------
</TABLE>
If, as a result of changes in regulation or competition, the Company's and
Resources' ability to recover these assets and liabilities would not be assured,
then pursuant to SFAS No. 101, "Accounting for the Discontinuation of
Application of SFAS No. 71" (SFAS No. 101) and SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of"
(SFAS No. 121), the Company and Resources would be required to write off or
write down such regulatory assets and liabilities, unless some form of
transition cost recovery continues through rates established and collected for
their remaining regulated operations. In addition, the Company and Resources
would be required to determine any impairment to the carrying costs of
deregulated plant and inventory assets. In order to reduce exposure to
potentially stranded costs related to generation assets, Electric Operations
redirected $195 million of depreciation in 1998 from transmission, distribution
and general plant assets to generation assets. Such redirection is in accordance
with the Company's transition to competition plan (Transition Plan) described in
Note 1(f). If Electric Operations was required to apply SFAS No. 101 to the
generation portion of its business only, the cumulative amount of redirected
depreciation of $195 million would become a regulatory asset of the transmission
and distribution portion of its business.
Effective January 1, 1996, the Company and Resources adopted SFAS No. 121.
SFAS No. 121 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles to be held and used or disposed of by an entity be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Adoption of the standard did
not result in a write-down of the carrying amount of any asset on the books of
the Company or Resources.
In July 1997, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board reached a consensus on Issue No. 97-4, "Deregulation
of the Pricing of Electricity -- Issues Related to the Application of FASB
Statements No. 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation,
and No. 101, Regulated Enterprises -- Accounting for the Discontinuation of
Application of FASB Statement No. 71" (EITF 97-4). EITF 97-4 concluded that the
application of SFAS No. 71 to a segment which is subject to a deregulation plan
should cease when the legislation and enabling rate order contain sufficient
detail for the utility to reasonably determine how the plan will affect the
segment to be deregulated. In addition, EITF 97-4 requires the regulatory assets
and liabilities to be allocated to the applicable portion of the electric
utility from which the source of the regulated cash flows will be derived. As a
part of the Transition Plan, the Company has agreed to support future
legislation providing for retail customer choice and other provisions consistent
with those in the 1997 proposed Texas legislation. At this time, the Company is
unable to make any predictions as to the details of legislation being considered
by the Texas legislature or the likelihood that such legislation will ultimately
be enacted. Although the Company has determined that no impairment loss or
write-offs of regulatory assets or carrying costs of plant and inventory assets
need to be recognized for applicable assets of Electric Operations as of
December 31, 1998, this conclusion may change in the future (i) as competition
influences wholesale and retail pricing in the electric utility industry, (ii)
depending on regulatory action, if any and (iii) depending on legislation, if
any, that is passed.
<PAGE> 13
(f) Depreciation and Amortization Expense.
The Company's consolidated depreciation expense for 1998 was $548 million
compared to $475 million for 1997 and $410 million for 1996.
In June 1998, the Public Utility Commission of Texas (Texas Utility
Commission) issued an order approving the Transition Plan filed by Electric
Operations in December 1997. In order to reduce Electric Operations' exposure
to potentially stranded costs related to generation assets, the Transition Plan
permits the redirection to generation assets of depreciation expense that
Electric Operations otherwise would apply to transmission, distribution and
general plant assets. In addition, the Transition Plan provides that all
earnings above a 9.844% overall annual rate of return on invested capital be
used to recover Electric Operations' investment in generation assets. Electric
Operations implemented the Transition Plan effective January 1, 1998 and
pursuant to its terms, recorded an aggregate of $194 million in additional
depreciation and $195 million in redirected depreciation in 1998.
The Company's depreciation and amortization expenses included $50 million
of additional depreciation relating to the South Texas Project Electric
Generating Station (South Texas Project) in both 1997 and 1996 and goodwill
amortization relating to the acquisition of Resources of $55 million in 1998
and $22 million in 1997. For additional information regarding the operation of
goodwill in connection with the Merger, see Note 1(b) above. The depreciation
expense recorded for the South Texas Project was made pursuant to the terms of
the Company's 1995 rate case settlement (1995 Rate Case Settlement), which
permitted the Company to write down as much as $50 million per year of its
investment in the South Texas Project through December 31, 1999. These
write-downs are treated under the 1995 Rate Case Settlement as reasonable and
necessary expenses for purposes of any future earnings reviews or other
proceedings.
In 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Company, as permitted by the 1995 Rate Case
Settlement, also amortized $4 million, $66 million and $50 million (pre-tax),
respectively, of its $153 million investment in certain lignite reserves
associated with a canceled generating station. The Company's remaining
investment in the canceled generating station and certain lignite reserves will
be amortized fully no later than December 31, 2002.
(n) Investments in Time Warner Securities.
The Company owns 11 million shares of non-publicly traded Time Warner
convertible preferred stock (TW Preferred). The TW Preferred is redeemable after
July 6, 2000, has an aggregate liquidation preference of $100 per share (plus
accrued and unpaid dividends), is entitled to annual dividends of $3.75 per
share until July 6, 1999, is currently convertible by the Company and after July
6, 1999 is exchangeable by Time Warner into approximately 45.8 million shares of
Time Warner common stock (TW Common). Each share of TW Preferred is entitled to
two votes (voting together with the holders of the TW Common as a single class).
The Company has accounted for its investment in TW Preferred under the cost
method at a value of $990 million on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Dividends on these securities are recognized as income at the time they are
earned. The Company recorded pre-tax dividend income with respect to the Time
Warner securities of $41.3 million in 1998 and 1997 and $41.6 million in 1996.
To monetize its investment in the TW Preferred, the Company sold in July
1997, 22.9 million of ACES. At maturity in July 2000, the principal amount of
the ACES will be mandatorily exchangeable by the Company into either (i) a
number of shares of TW Common based on an exchange rate or (ii) cash having an
equal value. Subject to adjustments that may result from certain dilution
events, the exchange rate for each ACES is determined as follows: (i) 1.6528
shares of TW Common if the price of TW Common at maturity (Maturity Price) is at
least $27.7922 per share, (ii) a fractional share of TW Common such that the
fractional share will have a value equal to $22.96875 if the Maturity Price is
less than $27.7922 but greater than $22.96875 and (iii) one share of TW Common
if the Maturity Price is not more than $22.96875. The closing price of TW Common
was $62.062 per share on December 31, 1998.
Prior to maturity, the Company has the option of redeeming the ACES if (i)
changes in federal tax regulations require recognition of a taxable gain on the
Company's TW Preferred and (ii) the Company could defer such gain by redeeming
the ACES. The redemption price is 105% of the closing sales price of the ACES as
determined over a period prior to the redemption notice. The redemption price
may be paid in cash or in shares of TW Common or a combination of the two.
As a result of the issuance of the ACES, a portion of the increase in the
market value above $27.7922 per share of TW Common results in non-cash,
unrealized accounting losses to the Company for the ACES, pending the conversion
of the Company's TW Preferred into TW Common. For example, prior to the
conversion, when the market price of TW Common increases above $27.7922, the
Company records in Other Income (Expense) an unrealized, non-cash accounting
loss for the ACES equal to (i) the aggregate amount of such increase as
applicable to all ACES multiplied by (ii) 0.8264. In accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, this accounting loss (which reflects the
unrealized increase in the Company's indebtedness with respect to the ACES) may
not be offset by accounting recognition of the increase in the market value of
the TW Common that underlies the TW Preferred. Upon conversion of the TW
Preferred (anticipated to occur in July 1999), the Company will begin recording
future unrealized net changes in the market prices of the TW Common and the ACES
as a component of common stock equity and other comprehensive income.
As of December 31, 1998 and 1997, the market price of TW Common was $62.062
and $31.00 per share, respectively. Accordingly, the Company recognized an
increase of $1.2 billion in 1998 and $121 million in 1997 in the unrealized
liability relating to its ACES indebtedness (which resulted in an after-tax
earnings reduction of $764 million or $2.69 basic earnings per share and $79
million or $.31 basic earnings per share, respectively). The Company believes
that the cumulative unrealized loss for the ACES of approximately $1.3 billion
is more than economically hedged by the approximately $1.8 billion unrecorded
unrealized gain at December 31, 1998 relating to the increase in the fair value
of the TW Common underlying the investment in TW Preferred since the date of its
acquisition. Any gain related to the increase in fair value of TW Common would
be recognized as a component of net income upon the sale of the TW Preferred or
the shares of TW Common into which such TW Preferred is converted. As of March
11, 1999, the price of TW Common was $70.75 per share which would have resulted
in the Company recognizing an additional increase of $329 million in the
unrealized liability relating to its ACES indebtedness. The related unrecorded
unrealized gain as of March 11, 1999 would have been computed as an additional
$398 million.
(p) Foreign Currency Adjustments
International assets and liabilities where the local currency is the
functional currency, have been translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange
rate at the balance sheet date. Revenues, expenses, gains, and losses have been
translated using the weighted average exchange rate for each month prevailing
during the periods reported. Cumulative adjustments resulting from translation
have been recorded in stockholders' equity and other comprehensive income. When
the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, the financial statements of
International are remeasured in U.S. dollars using historical exchange rates for
non-monetary accounts and the current rate at the respective balance sheet date
and the weighted average exchange rate for all other balance sheet and income
statement accounts, respectively. All exchange gains and losses from
remeasurement and foreign currency transactions are included in consolidated net
income. However, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the
U.S. dollar can have an impact on the reported equity earnings of the Company's
foreign investments. For additional information about the Company's investments
in unconsolidated affiliates, see Note 5. For additional information about the
Company's investments in Brazil and the devaluation of the Brazilian real in
January 1999, see Note 16(a).
2
<PAGE> 14
(r) Change in Accounting Principle.
In the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company adopted mark-to-market
accounting for all of the energy price risk management and trading activities of
Reliant Energy Services. Under mark-to-market accounting, the Company records
the fair value of energy-related derivative financial instruments, including
physical forward contracts, swaps, options and exchange-traded futures contracts
at each balance sheet date. Such amounts are recorded in the Company's
Consolidated Balance Sheet as price risk management assets, price risk
management liabilities, deferred debits and deferred liabilities. The realized
and unrealized gains (losses) are recorded as a component of operating revenues
in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has applied
mark-to-market accounting retroactively to January 1, 1998. This change was made
in order to adopt a generally accepted accounting methodology that provided
consistency between financial reporting and the methodology used in all reported
periods by the Company in managing its trading activities. There was no material
cumulative effect resulting from the accounting change.
The Company will adopt Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 98-10, "Accounting
for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" in the
first quarter of 1999 for Reliant Energy Services' trading activities. The
Company does not expect the implementation of EITF Issue 98-10 to be material
to its consolidated financial statements.
(2) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) Price Risk Management and Trading Activities.
The Company, through Reliant Energy Services, offers energy price risk
management services primarily in the natural gas, electric and crude oil and
refined product industries. Reliant Energy Services provides these services by
utilizing, a variety of derivative financial instruments, including fixed and
variable-priced physical forward contracts, fixed-price swap agreements,
variable-price swap agreements, exchange-traded energy futures and option
contracts, and swaps and options traded in the over-the-counter financial
markets (Trading Derivatives). Fixed-price swap agreements require payments to,
or receipts of payments from, counterparties based on the differential between
a fixed and variable price for the commodity. Variable-price swap agreements
require payments to, or receipts of payments from, counterparties based on the
differential between industry pricing publications or exchange quotations.
Prior to 1998, Reliant Energy Services applied hedge accounting to certain
physical commodity activities that qualified for hedge accounting. In 1998,
Reliant Energy Services adopted mark-to-market accounting for all of its price
risk management and trading activities. Accordingly, as of such date such
Trading Derivatives are recorded at fair value with realized and unrealized
gains (losses) recorded as a component of operating revenues in the Company's
Consolidated Statements of Income. The recognized, unrealized balance is
recorded as price risk management assets/liabilities and deferred
debits/credits on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets (See Note 1(r)).
The notional quantities, maximum terms and the estimated fair value of
Trading Derivatives at December 31, 1998 are presented below (volumes in
billions of British thermal units equivalent (BBtue) and dollars in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VOLUME-FIXED
VOLUME-FIXED PRICE MAXIMUM
1998 PRICE PAYOR RECEIVER TERM (YEARS)
---- ----------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.................................................. 937,264 977,293 9
Electricity.................................................. 122,950 124,878 3
Crude oil and products....................................... 205,499 204,223 3
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE FAIR
FAIR VALUE VALUE (a)
---------------------- ----------------------
1998 ASSETS LIABILITIES ASSETS LIABILITIES
---- ------ ----------- ------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.............................................. $ 224 $ 213 $ 124 $ 108
Electricity.............................................. 34 33 186 186
Crude oil and products................................... 29 23 21 17
------ ----------- ------ -----------
$ 287 $ 269 $ 331 $ 311
====== =========== ====== ===========
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE> 15
The notional quantities, maximum terms and the estimated fair value of
derivative financial instruments at December 31, 1997 are presented below
(volumes in BBtue and dollars in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VOLUME-FIXED
VOLUME-FIXED PRICE MAXIMUM
1997 PRICE PAYOR RECEIVER TERM (YEARS)
---- ----------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.................................................. 85,701 64,890 4
Electricity.................................................. 40,511 42,976 1
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE FAIR
FAIR VALUE VALUE (a)
---------------------- ----------------------
1997 ASSETS LIABILITIES ASSETS LIABILITIES
---- ------ ----------- ------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.............................................. $ 46 $ 39 $ 56 $ 48
Electricity.............................................. 6 6 3 2
------ ----------- ------ -----------
$ 52 $ 45 $ 59 $ 50
====== =========== ====== ===========
</TABLE>
- ---------
(a) Computed using the ending balance of each month.
In addition to the fixed-price notional volumes above, Reliant Energy
Services also has variable-priced agreements, as discussed above, totaling
1,702,977 and 101,465 BBtue as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Notional amounts reflect the volume of transactions but do not represent the
amounts exchanged by the parties to the financial instruments. Accordingly,
notional amounts do not accurately measure the Company's exposure to market or
credit risks.
All of the fair value shown in the table above at December 31, 1998 and
substantially all of the fair value at December 31, 1997 have been recognized in
income. The fair value as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 was estimated using
quoted prices where available and considering the liquidity of the market for
the Trading Derivatives. The prices are subject to significant changes based on
changing market conditions.
At December 31, 1998, $22 million of the fair value of the assets and $41
million of the fair value of the liabilities are recorded as long-term on
deferred debits and deferred credits, respectively on the Company's Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
The weighted-average term of the trading portfolio, based on volumes, is
less than one year. The maximum and average terms disclosed herein are not
indicative of likely future cash flows, as these positions may be changed by new
transactions in the trading portfolio at any time in response to changing market
conditions, market liquidity and the Company's risk management portfolio needs
and strategies. Terms regarding cash settlements of these contracts vary with
respect to the actual timing of cash receipts and payments.
In addition to the risk associated with price movements, credit risk is
also inherent in the Company and its subsidiaries' risk management activities.
Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from non-performance of
contractual obligations by a counterparty. The following table shows the
composition of the total price risk management assets of Reliant Energy Services
as of December 31, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INVESTMENT
GRADE (1) TOTAL
---------------------------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Energy marketers....................................... $ 102,458 $ 123,779
Financial institutions................................. 61,572 61,572
Gas and electric utilities............................. 46,880 48,015
Oil and gas producers.................................. 7,197 8,323
Industrials............................................ 1,807 3,233
Independent power producers............................ 1,452 1,463
Others................................................. 45,421 46,696
------------ ------------
Total............................................. $ 266,787 $ 293,081
============
Credit and other reserves.............................. (6,464)
------------
Energy price risk management assets (2)................ $ 286,617
============
</TABLE>
- ---------
(1) "Investment Grade" is primarily determined using publicly available credit
ratings along with the consideration of credit support (e.g., parent
company guarantees) and collateral, which encompass cash and standby
letters of credit.
(2) The Company has credit risk exposure with respect to two investment grade
customers, each of which represents an amount greater than 5% but less than
10% of Price Risk Management Assets.
4
<PAGE> 16
(b) Non-Trading Activities.
To reduce the risk from market fluctuations in the price of electric power,
natural gas and related transportation, the Company, Resources and certain of
its subsidiaries enter into futures transactions, swaps and options (Energy
Derivatives) in order to hedge certain natural gas in storage, as well as
certain expected purchases, sales and transportation of natural gas and electric
power (a portion of which are firm commitments at the inception of the hedge).
Energy Derivatives are also utilized to fix the price of compressor fuel or
other future operational gas requirements, although usage to date for this
purpose has not been material. The Company applies hedge accounting with respect
to its derivative financial instruments.
Certain subsidiaries of the Company also utilize interest-rate derivatives
(principally interest-rate swaps) in order to adjust the portion of its overall
borrowings which are subject to interest rate risk and also utilize such
derivatives to effectively fix the interest rate on debt expected to be issued
for refunding purposes.
For transactions involving either Energy Derivatives or interest-rate
derivatives, hedge accounting is applied only if the derivative (i) reduces the
price risk of the underlying hedged item and (ii) is designated as a hedge at
its inception. Additionally, the derivatives must be expected to result in
financial impacts which are inversely correlated to those of the item(s) to be
hedged. This correlation (a measure of hedge effectiveness) is measured both at
the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, with an acceptable level of
correlation of at least 80% for hedge designation. If and when correlation
ceases to exist at an acceptable level, hedge accounting ceases and
mark-to-market accounting is applied.
In the case of interest-rate swaps associated with existing obligations,
cash flows and expenses associated with the interest-rate derivative
transactions are matched with the cash flows and interest expense of the
obligation being hedged, resulting in an adjustment to the effective interest
rate. When interest rate swaps are utilized to effectively fix the interest rate
for an anticipated debt issuance, changes in the market value of the
interest-rate derivatives are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the
effective interest rate on the newly issued debt.
Unrealized changes in the market value of Energy Derivatives utilized as
hedges are not generally recognized in the Company's Consolidated Statements of
Income until the underlying hedged transaction occurs. Once it becomes probable
that an anticipated transaction will not occur, deferred gains and losses are
recognized. In general, the financial impact of transactions involving these
Energy Derivatives is included in the Company's Statements of Consolidated
Income under the captions (i) fuel expenses, in the case of natural gas
transactions and (ii) purchased power, in the case of electric power
transactions. Cash flows resulting from these transactions in Energy Derivatives
are included in the Company's Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows in the same
category as the item being hedged.
At December 31, 1998, subsidiaries of Resources were fixed-price payors and
fixed-price receivers in Energy Derivatives covering 42,498 billion British
thermal units (Bbtu) and 3,930 BBtu of natural gas, respectively. At December
31, 1997, subsidiaries of Resources were fixed-price payors and fixed-price
receivers in Energy Derivatives covering 38,754 BBtu and 7,647 BBtu of natural
gas, respectively. Also, at December 31, 1998 and 1997, subsidiaries of
Resources were parties to variable-priced Energy Derivatives totaling 21,437
Bbtu and 3,630 BBtu of natural gas, respectively. The weighted average maturity
of these instruments is less than one year.
The notional amount is intended to be indicative of the Company's and its
subsidiaries' level of activity in such derivatives, although the amounts at
risk are significantly smaller because, in view of the price movement
correlation required for hedge accounting, changes in the market value of these
derivatives generally are offset by changes in the value associated with the
underlying physical transactions or in other derivatives. When Energy
Derivatives are closed out in advance of the underlying commitment or
anticipated transaction, however, the market value changes may not offset due to
the fact that price movement correlation ceases to exist when the positions are
closed, as further discussed below. Under such circumstances, gains (losses) are
deferred and recognized as a component of income when the underlying hedged item
is recognized in income.
The average maturity discussed above and the fair value discussed in Note
13 are not necessarily indicative of likely future cash flows as these positions
may be changed by new transactions in the trading portfolio at any time in
response to changing market conditions, market liquidity and the Company's risk
management portfolio needs and strategies. Terms regarding cash settlements of
these contracts vary with respect to the actual timing of cash receipts and
payments.
5
<PAGE> 17
(c) Trading and Non-trading -- General Policy.
In addition to the risk associated with price movements, credit risk is
also inherent in the Company's and its subsidiaries' risk management activities.
Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from non-performance of
contractual obligations by a counterparty. While as yet the Company and its
subsidiaries have experienced only minor losses due to the credit risk
associated with these arrangements, the Company has off-balance sheet risk to
the extent that the counterparties to these transactions may fail to perform as
required by the terms of each such contract. In order to minimize this risk, the
Company and/or its subsidiaries, as the case may be, enter into such contracts
primarily with those counterparties with a minimum Standard & Poor's or Moody's
rating of BBB- or Baa3, respectively. For long-term arrangements, the Company
and its subsidiaries periodically review the financial condition of such firms
in addition to monitoring the effectiveness of these financial contracts in
achieving the Company's objectives. Should the counterparties to these
arrangements fail to perform, the Company would seek to compel performance at
law or otherwise or obtain compensatory damages in lieu thereof. The Company
might be forced to acquire alternative hedging arrangements or be required to
honor the underlying commitment at then- current market prices. In such event,
the Company might incur additional loss to the extent of amounts, if any,
already paid to the counterparties. In view of its criteria for selecting
counterparties, its process for monitoring the financial strength of these
counterparties and its experience to date in successfully completing these
transactions, the Company believes that the risk of incurring a significant
financial statement loss due to the non-performance of counterparties to these
transactions is minimal.
The Company's policies prohibit the use of leveraged financial instruments.
The Company has established a Corporate Risk Oversight Committee, comprised
of corporate and business segment officers, to oversee all corporate price and
credit risks, including Reliant Energy Services' trading, marketing and risk
management activities. The Corporate Risk Oversight Committee's responsibilities
include reviewing the Company's and its subsidiaries' hedging, trading and price
risk management strategies, activities and limits and monitoring to ensure
compliance with the Company's risk management policies and procedures and
trading limits established by the Company's board of directors.
(3) RATE MATTERS
(a) Electric Proceedings.
The Texas Utility Commission has original (or in some cases appellate)
jurisdiction over Electric Operations' electric rates and services. Texas
Utility Commission orders may be appealed to a District Court in Travis County,
and from that court's decision an appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals
for the 3rd District at Austin (Austin Court of Appeals). Discretionary review
by the Supreme Court of Texas may be sought from decisions of the Austin Court
of Appeals. In the event that the courts ultimately reverse actions of the Texas
Utility Commission, such matters are remanded to the Texas Utility Commission
for action in light of the courts' orders.
(b) Transition Plan.
In June 1998, the Texas Utility Commission issued an order in Docket No.
18465 approving the Company's Transition Plan filed by Electric Operations in
December 1997. The Transition Plan included base rate credits to residential
customers of 4% in 1998 and an additional 2% in 1999. Commercial customers whose
monthly billing is 1,000 kva or less are entitled to receive base rate credits
of 2% in each of 1998 and 1999. The Company implemented the Transition Plan
effective January 1, 1998.
For information about additional depreciation of generation assets and
redirecting depreciation pursuant to the Transition Plan, see Note 1(f).
Review of the Texas Utility Commission's order in Docket No. 18465 is
currently pending before the Travis County District Court. In August 1998, the
Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas and a Texas municipality
filed an appeal seeking, among other things, to reverse the portion of the Texas
Utility Commission's order relating to the redirection of depreciation expenses
under the Transition Plan. Because of the number of variables that can affect
the ultimate resolution of an appeal of Commission orders, the Company is not in
a position at this time to predict the outcome of this matter or the ultimate
effect that adverse action by the courts could have on the Company.
(4) JOINTLY OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANT
(a) Investment in South Texas Project.
The Company has a 30.8% interest in the South Texas Project, which consists
of two 1,250 megawatt (MW) nuclear generating units and bears a corresponding
30.8% share of capital and operating costs associated with the project. As of
December 31, 1998, the Company's investment in the South Texas Project
(including AFUDC) was $1.4 billion (net of $1.1 billion accumulated
depreciation). The Company's investment in nuclear fuel (including AFUDC) was
$41 million (net of $230 million amortization) as of such date.
6
<PAGE> 18
The South Texas Project is owned as a tenancy in common among its four
co-owners, with each owner retaining its undivided ownership interest in the two
nuclear-fueled generating units and the electrical output from those units. The
four co-owners have delegated management and operation responsibility for the
South Texas Project to the South Texas Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC).
STPNOC is managed by a board of directors comprised of one director from each of
the four owners, along with the chief executive officer of STPNOC. The four
owners provide oversight through an owners' committee comprised of
representatives of each of the owners and through the board of directors of
STPNOC. Prior to November 1997, the Company was the operator of the South Texas
Project.
(b) Nuclear Insurance.
The Company and the other owners of the South Texas Project maintain
nuclear property and nuclear liability insurance coverage as required by law and
periodically review available limits and coverage for additional protection. The
owners of the South Texas Project currently maintain $2.75 billion in property
damage insurance coverage, which is above the legally required minimum, but is
less than the total amount of insurance currently available for such losses.
This coverage consists of $500 million in primary property damage insurance and
excess property insurance in the amount of $2.25 billion. With respect to excess
property insurance, the Company and the other owners of the South Texas Project
are subject to assessments, the maximum aggregate assessment under current
policies being $16.5 million during any one policy year. The application of the
proceeds of such property insurance is subject to the priorities established by
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations relating to the safety of
licensed reactors and decontamination operations.
Pursuant to the Price Anderson Act, the maximum liability to the public of
owners of nuclear power plants, such as the South Texas Project, was $9.145
billion as of December 31, 1998. Owners are required under the Price Anderson
Act to insure their liability for nuclear incidents and protective evacuations
by maintaining the maximum amount of financial protection available from private
sources and by maintaining secondary financial protection through an industry
retrospective rating plan. The assessment of deferred premiums provided by the
plan for each nuclear incident is up to $83.9 million per reactor, subject to
indexing for inflation, a possible 5% surcharge (but no more than $10 million
per reactor per incident in any one year) and a 3% state premium tax. The
Company and the other owners of the South Texas Project currently maintain the
required nuclear liability insurance and participate in the industry
retrospective rating plan.
There can be no assurance that all potential losses or liabilities will be
insurable, or that the amount of insurance will be sufficient to cover them. Any
substantial losses not covered by insurance would have a material effect on the
Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
(c) Nuclear Decommissioning.
The Company contributes $14.8 million per year to a trust established to
fund its share of the decommissioning costs for the South Texas Project. For a
discussion of the accounting treatment for the securities held in the Company's
nuclear decommissioning trust, see Note 1(o). In May 1994, an outside consultant
estimated the Company's portion of decommissioning costs to be approximately
$318 million (1994 dollars). The consultant's calculation of decommissioning
costs for financial planning purposes used the DECON methodology (prompt
removal/dismantling), one of the three alternatives acceptable to the NRC and
assumed deactivation of Units Nos. 1 and 2 upon the expiration of their 40-year
operating licenses. While the current and projected funding levels currently
exceed minimum NRC requirements, no assurance can be given that the amounts held
in trust will be adequate to cover the actual decommissioning costs of the South
Texas Project. Such costs may vary because of changes in the assumed date of
decommissioning, changes in regulatory and accounting requirements, changes in
technology and changes in costs of labor, materials and equipment. An update of
the 1994 study is in the process of being completed.
(d) Assessment Fees for Spent Fuel Disposal and Enrichment and Decommissioning.
By contract, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) has committed
itself ultimately to take possession of all spent fuel generated by the South
Texas Project. The DOE contract currently requires payment of a spent fuel
disposal fee on nuclear plant-generated electricity of one mill (one-tenth of a
cent) per net KWH sold. This fee is subject to adjustment to ensure full cost
recovery by the DOE. The Energy Policy Act also includes a provision that
assesses a fee upon domestic utilities that purchased nuclear fuel enrichment
services from the DOE before October 24, 1992. The South Texas Project's
assessment is approximately $2 million per year (subject to escalation for
inflation). The Company has a remaining estimated liability of $5 million for
such assessments.
7
<PAGE> 19
(e) 1996 Settlement of South Texas Project Litigation.
In 1996, the Company recorded an aggregate $95 million ($62 million net of
tax) charge in connection with various settlements of lawsuits filed by
co-owners of the South Texas Project. For information about the execution of an
operations agreement with the City of San Antonio in connection with one of
these settlements, see Note 12(c).
(5) EQUITY INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES TO UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
The Company accounts for affiliate investments of its subsidiaries under
the equity method of accounting where (i) the subsidiary's ownership interest in
the affiliate ranges from 20% to 50%, (ii) the ownership interest is less than
20% but the subsidiary exercises significant influence over operating and
financial policies of such affiliate or (iii) the subsidiary's ownership
interest in the affiliate exceeds 50% but the subsidiary does not exercise
control over the affiliate.
The Company's and its subsidiaries' equity investments and advances in
unconsolidated subsidiaries at December 31, 1998 and 1997 were $1 billion and
$704 million, respectively. The Company's and its subsidiaries' equity income
from these investments, included in International revenues and other net income,
was $71 million, $49 million and $17 million in 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. Dividends received from the investments amounted to $44 million
and $46 million in 1998 and 1997, respectively. No dividends were received from
these investments in 1996.
(a) International.
In April 1998, Light ServiHos de Eletricidade S.A. (Light), a
Brazilian corporation in which Reliant Energy International, Inc. (Reliant
Energy International) indirectly owns an 11.69% common stock interest, purchased
74.88% of the common stock of Metropolitana Eletricidade de Sao Paulo S.A.
(Metropolitana), an electric distribution company that serves the metropolitan
area of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The purchase price for the shares was approximately
$1.8 billion and was financed with proceeds from bank borrowings. As of December
31, 1998, Light and Metropolitana had approximately $3.2 billion in non-local
currency denominated borrowings. For information regarding foreign currency
adjustments, see Note 1(p). For information about the devaluation of the
Brazilian real in January 1999, see Note 16(a).
In May 1997, Reliant Energy International increased its indirect ownership
interest in an Argentine electric utility from 48% to 63%. The purchase price
of the additional interest was $28 million.
On June 30, 1998, Reliant Energy International sold its 63% ownership
interest in an Argentine affiliate and certain related assets for approximately
$243 million. Reliant Energy International acquired its initial ownership
interests in the electric utility in 1992. The Company recorded an $80 million
after-tax gain from this sale in the second quarter of 1998.
In 1998, a subsidiary of Reliant Energy International acquired for
approximately $150 million, equity interests (currently ranging from
approximately 36% to 45%) in three electric distribution systems located in El
Salvador. Corporacion EDC S.A.C.A. (CEDC), Reliant Energy International's
partner in this venture, acquired majority interests in the systems when they
were privatized in early 1998. On June 30, 1998, CEDC closed on the sale of
approximately half of its interests in the systems to a subsidiary of Reliant
Energy International.
In August 1998, Reliant Energy International and CEDC jointly acquired,
through subsidiaries, 65% of the stock of two Colombian electric distribution
companies, Electricaribe and Electrocosta. The shares of these companies are
indirectly held by an offshore holding company jointly owned by special purpose
subsidiaries of CEDC and Reliant Energy International.
The purchase price for the joint investment in Electricaribe and
Electrocosta was approximately $522 million, excluding transaction costs. The
purchase price was funded with capital contributions from Reliant Energy
International and CEDC and a U.S. $200 million loan obtained by the holding
company from a United States bank. A $100 million advance on the loan was
obtained in October 1998 with subsequent advances of $25 million and $75 million
obtained in December 1998 and January 1999, respectively. The loan will mature
on October 31, 2003. Reliant Energy International funded its capital
contributions with a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Argentine
affiliate discussed above and capital contributions from the Company. Under the
terms of a support agreement, Reliant Energy International and CEDC have agreed,
among other things, to repurchase up to U.S. $50 million of the loan from the
bank to the extent that the bank is unable to syndicate that portion of the loan
to other banks on or prior to June 15, 1999.
In June 1997, a consortium of investors which included a subsidiary of
Reliant Energy International, acquired for $496 million a 56.7% controlling
ownership interest in Empresa de Energia del Pacifico S.A.E.S.P. (EPSA), an
electric utility system serving the Valle de Cauca province of Colombia,
including the area surrounding the city of Cali. Reliant Energy International
contributed $152 million of the purchase price for a 28.35% ownership interest
in EPSA. In addition to its distribution facilities, EPSA owns 850 MW of
electric generation capacity.
8
<PAGE> 20
Reliant Energy International has accounted for these transactions under
purchase accounting and has recorded its investments and its interest in the
affiliates' earnings after the acquisition dates using the equity method. The
purchase prices were allocated, on a preliminary basis, using the estimated fair
market values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the dates
of acquisition. The differences between the amounts paid and the underlying fair
values of the net assets acquired are being amortized as a component of earnings
attributable to unconsolidated affiliates over the estimated lives of the
projects ranging from 30 to 40 years. Purchase price adjustments to fixed assets
are being amortized over the underlying assets' estimated useful lives.
(b) Combined Financial Statement Data of Equity Investments and Advances to
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries.
The following table sets forth certain summarized financial information of
the Company's unconsolidated affiliates as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for
the years then ended or periods from the respective affiliates' acquisition date
through December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, if shorter:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
($ IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income Statement:
Revenues....................... $ 2,449,335 $ 2,011,927 $ 994,743
Operating Expenses............. 1,762,166 1,460,248 768,993
Net Income..................... 514,005 403,323 149,038
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------
1998 1997
---------------- ----------------
($ IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet:
Current Assets................... $ 1,841,857 $ 726,997
Noncurrent Assets................ 13,643,747 5,791,858
Current Liabilities.............. 4,074,603 566,596
Noncurrent Liabilities........... 6,284,821 1,398,385
Owner's Equity................... 5,126,180 4,553,874
</TABLE>
(8) LONG-TERM DEBT AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
(c) FinanceCo and FinanceCo II Credit Facilities.
In August 1997, a limited partnership special purpose subsidiary of the
Company (FinanceCo) established a five-year, $1.644 billion revolving credit
facility (FinanceCo Facility). The FinanceCo Facility supported $1.360 billion
in commercial paper borrowings by FinanceCo at December 31, 1998 recorded as
notes payable on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The weighted average
interest rate of these borrowings was 5.88% at December 31, 1998, and 6.15%
at December 31, 1997.
Borrowings under the FinanceCo Facility bear interest at a rate based upon
the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) plus a margin, a base rate or at a
rate determined through a bidding process. The FinanceCo Facility may be used
(i) to support the issuance of commercial paper or other short-term indebtedness
of FinanceCo, (ii) subject to certain limitations, to finance purchases of
Company common stock and (iii) subject to certain limitations, to provide funds
for general purposes of FinanceCo, including the making of intercompany loans
to, or securing letters of credit for the benefit of, FinanceCo's affiliates.
The FinanceCo Facility requires the Company to maintain a ratio of
consolidated indebtedness for borrowed money to consolidated capitalization (as
defined) that does not exceed 0.65:1.00. The FinanceCo Facility also contains
restrictions applicable to the Company and certain of its subsidiaries with
respect to, among other things, (i) liens, (ii) consolidations, mergers and
dispositions of assets, (iii) dividends and purchases of common stock, (iv)
certain types of investments and (v) certain changes in its business. The
FinanceCo Facility contains customary covenants and default provisions
applicable to FinanceCo and its subsidiaries, including limitations on, among
other things, additional indebtedness (other than certain permitted
indebtedness), liens and certain investments or loans.
Subject to certain conditions and limitations, the Company is required to
make cash payments from time to time to FinanceCo from excess cash flow (as
defined in the FinanceCo Facility) to the extent necessary to enable FinanceCo
to meet its financial obligations. At December 31, 1998, commercial paper
supported by the FinanceCo Facility was secured by pledges of (i) all of the
limited and general partner interests of FinanceCo, (ii) the Series B Preference
Stock and (iii) certain intercompany notes held by FinanceCo. The obligations
under the FinanceCo Facility are not secured by the utility assets of the
Company or Resources or by the Company's investment in Time Warner securities.
In March 1998, a limited partnership special purpose subsidiary of the
Company (FinanceCo II) executed a $150 million credit agreement (FinanceCo II
Facility) which terminated March 2, 1999. Proceeds from $150 million of
borrowings under the FinanceCo II Facility were used to fund a portion of the
April 1998 purchase by Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc. (Power Generation)
of four electric generation plants. Borrowings under the FinanceCo II Facility
bore interest at LIBOR-based and negotiated rates. At December 31, 1998,
FinanceCo II had $150 million of borrowings under this facility at an interest
rate of 5.75%. In March 1999, the $150 million of borrowings under the FinanceCo
II facility were paid at maturity with borrowings under the FinanceCo facility.
9
<PAGE> 21
(d) Company Credit Facility.
The Company meets its short-term financing needs primarily through sales of
commercial paper supported by a $200 million revolving credit facility.
Borrowings under the facility are unsecured and a facility fee is paid. At
December 31, 1998, there was no outstanding commercial paper and there were no
outstanding borrowings under the bank facility.
(9) TRUST SECURITIES
(a) Company.
In February 1997, two Delaware statutory business trusts (Reliant Trusts)
established by the Company issued (i) $250 million of preferred securities and
(ii) $100 million of capital securities, respectively. The preferred securities
have a distribution rate of 8.125% payable quarterly in arrears, a stated
liquidation amount of $25 per preferred security and must be redeemed by March
2046. The capital securities have a distribution rate of 8.257% payable
quarterly in arrears, a stated liquidation amount of $1,000 per capital security
and must be redeemed by February 2037.
The Reliant Trusts sold the preferred and capital securities to the public
and used the proceeds to purchase $350 million aggregate principal amount of
subordinated debentures (Debentures) from the Company having interest rates
corresponding to the distribution rates of the securities and maturity dates
corresponding to the mandatory redemption dates of the securities. The Reliant
Trusts are accounted for as wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries of the
Company. The Debentures represent the Reliant Trusts' sole assets and its entire
operations. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a
subordinated basis, each Trust's obligations, including the payment of
distributions and all other payments due with respect to the respective
preferred and capital securities. The preferred and capital securities are
mandatorily redeemable upon the repayment of the related Debentures at their
stated maturity or earlier redemption.
Subject to certain limitations, the Company has the option of deferring
payments of interest on the Debentures held by the Reliant Trusts. If and for as
long as interest payments on the Debentures have been deferred, or an event of
default under the indenture relating thereto has occurred and is continuing, the
Company may not pay dividends on its capital stock. As of December 31, 1998, no
interest payments on the Debentures had been deferred.
(12) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Commitments.
The Company has various commitments for capital expenditures, fuel,
purchased power, cooling water and operating leases. Commitments in connection
with Electric Operations' capital program are generally revocable by the
Company, subject to reimbursement to manufacturers for expenditures incurred or
other cancellation penalties. The Company's and its subsidiaries' other
commitments have various quantity requirements and durations. However, if these
requirements could not be met, various alternatives are available to mitigate
the cost associated with the contracts' commitments.
(b) Fuel and Purchased Power.
The Company is a party to several long-term coal, lignite and natural gas
contracts which have various quantity requirements and durations. Minimum
payment obligations for coal and transportation agreements are approximately
$210 million in 1999, $187 million in 2000 and $188 million in 2001.
Additionally, minimum payment obligations for lignite mining and lease
agreements are approximately $9 million for 1999, $10 million for 2000 and $10
million for 2001. Minimum payment obligations for both natural gas purchase and
storage contracts associated with Electric Operations are approximately $10
million in 1999, $9 million in 2000 and $9 million in 2001.
The Company also has commitments to purchase firm capacity from two
cogenerators totaling approximately $22 million in both 1999 and 2000. Texas
Utility Commission rules currently allow recovery of these costs through
Electric Operations' base rates for electric service and additionally authorize
the Company to charge or credit customers through a purchased power cost
recovery factor for any variation in actual purchased power costs from the cost
utilized to determine its base rates. In the event that the Texas Utility
Commission, at some future date, does not allow recovery through rates of any
amount of purchased power payments, these two firm capacity contracts contain
provisions allowing the Company to suspend or reduce payments and seek repayment
for amounts disallowed. Both of these firm capacity contracts have initial terms
ending March 31, 2005.
10
<PAGE> 22
(c) Operations Agreement with City of San Antonio.
As part of the 1996 settlement of certain litigation claims asserted by the
City of San Antonio with respect to the South Texas Project, the Company entered
into a 10-year joint operations agreement under which the Company and the City
of San Antonio, acting through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio
(CPS), share savings resulting from the joint dispatching of their respective
generating assets in order to take advantage of each system's lower cost
resources. Under the terms of the joint operations agreement entered into
between CPS and Electric Operations, the Company has guaranteed CPS minimum
annual savings of $10 million and a minimum cumulative savings of $150 million
over the 10-year term of the agreement. Based on current forecasts and other
assumptions regarding the combined operation of the two generating systems, the
Company anticipates that the savings resulting from joint operations will equal
or exceed the minimum savings guaranteed under the joint operating agreement. In
1996, savings generated for CPS' account for a partial year of joint operations
were approximately $14 million. In 1997 and 1998, savings generated for CPS'
account for a full year of operation were approximately $22 million and $14
million, respectively.
(d) Transportation Agreement.
Resources had an agreement (ANR Agreement) with ANR Pipeline Company (ANR)
which contemplated that Resources would transfer to ANR an interest in certain
of Resources' pipeline and related assets. The interest represented capacity of
250 Mmcf/day. Under the ANR Agreement, an ANR affiliate advanced $125 million to
Resources. Subsequently, the parties restructured the ANR Agreement and
Resources refunded in 1995 and 1993, respectively, $50 million and $34 million
to ANR or an affiliate. Resources recorded $41 million as a liability reflecting
ANR's or its affiliates' use of 130 Mmcf/day of capacity in certain of
Resources' transportation facilities. The level of transportation will decline
to 100 Mmcf/day in the year 2003 with a refund of $5 million to an ANR
affiliate. The ANR Agreement will terminate in 2005 with a refund of the
remaining balance.
(e) Lease Commitments.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Company's
obligations under non-cancelable long-term operating leases:
Minimum Lease Commitments at December 31, 1998 (1)
(Millions of Dollars)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1999.................................................... $ 20
2000.................................................... 16
2001.................................................... 15
2002.................................................... 11
2003.................................................... 10
2004 and beyond......................................... 66
---------
Total......................................... $ 138
---------
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Principally consisting of rental agreements for building space and data
processing equipment and vehicles (including major work equipment).
Resources has a master leasing agreement which provides for the lease of
vehicles, construction equipment, office furniture, data processing equipment
and other property. For accounting purposes, the lease is treated as an
operating lease. Resources does not expect to lease additional property under
this lease agreement.
Total rental expense for all Resources' leases was approximately $25
million in 1998. Total rental expense for all leases in 1997 since the
Acquisition Date was approximately $15 million.
(f) Letters of Credit.
At December 31, 1998, the Company and Resources had letters of credit
incidental with their ordinary business operations totaling approximately $34
million under which they are obligated to reimburse drawings, if any.
(g) Indemnity Provisions.
At December 31, 1998, Resources had a $5.8 million accounting reserve on
the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet in Other Deferred Credits for possible
indemnity claims asserted in connection with its disposition of Resources'
former subsidiaries or divisions, including the sale of (i) Louisiana Intrastate
Gas Corporation, a former Resources subsidiary engaged in the intrastate
pipeline and liquids extraction business; (ii) Arkla Exploration Company, a
former Resources subsidiary engaged in oil and gas exploration and production
activities; and (iii) Dyco Petroleum Company, a former Resources subsidiary
engaged in oil and gas exploration and production.
(h) Environmental Matters.
The Company is a defendant in litigation arising out of the environmental
remediation of a site in Corpus Christi, Texas. The litigation was instituted in
1985 by adjacent landowners. The litigation is pending before the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division. The
site was operated by third parties as a metals reclaiming operation. Although
the Company neither operated nor owned the site, certain transformers and other
equipment originally sold by the Company may have been delivered to the site by
third parties. The Company and others have remediated the site pursuant to a
plan approved by appropriate state agencies and a federal court. To date, the
Company has recovered or has commitments to recover from other responsible
parties $2.2 million of the more than $3 million it has spent on remediation.
11
<PAGE> 23
In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (i)
identified the Company, along with several other parties, as "potentially
responsible parties" (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) for the costs of cleaning up a site
located adjacent to one of the Company's transmission lines in La Marque, Texas
and (ii) issued an administrative order for the remediation of the site. The
Company believes that the EPA took this action solely on the basis of
information indicating that the Company in the 1950s acquired record title to a
portion of the land on which the site is located. The Company does not believe
that it now or previously has held any ownership interest in the property
covered by the order and has obtained a judgement to that effect from a court in
Galveston County, Texas. Based on this judgement and other defenses that the
Company believes to be meritorious, the Company has elected not to adhere to the
EPA's administrative order, even though the Company understands that other PRPs
are proceeding with site remediation. To date, neither the EPA nor any other PRP
has instituted an action against the Company for any share of the remediation
costs for the site. However, if the Company was determined to be a responsible
party, the Company could be jointly and severally liable along with the other
PRPs for the aggregate remediation costs of the site (which the Company
currently estimates to be approximately $80 million in the aggregate) and could
be assessed substantial fines and damage claims. Although the ultimate outcome
of this matter cannot currently be predicted at this time, the Company does not
believe that this case will have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
From time to time the Company and its subsidiaries have received notices
from regulatory authorities or others regarding their status as potential PRPs
in connection with sites found to require remediation due to the presence of
environmental contaminants. In addition, the Company has been named as defendant
in litigation related to such sites and in recent years has been named, along
with numerous others, as a defendant in several lawsuits filed by a large number
of individuals who claim injury due to exposure to asbestos while working at
sites along the Texas Gulf Coast. Most of these claimants have been workers who
participated in construction of various industrial facilities, including power
plants, and some of the claimants have worked at locations owned by the Company.
The Company anticipates that additional claims like those received may be
asserted in the future and intends to continue its practice of vigorously
contesting claims which it does not consider to have merit. Although their
ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, the Company does not believe,
based on its experience to date, that these matters, either individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position, results of operation or cash flows.
(i) Other.
Electric Operations' service area is heavily dependent on oil, gas, refined
products, petrochemicals and related businesses. Significant adverse events
affecting these industries would negatively affect the revenues of the Company.
The Company and Resources are involved in legal, tax and regulatory
proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions and governmental
agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of
which involve substantial amounts. The Company's management regularly analyzes
current information and, as necessary, provides accruals for probable
liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. The Company's
management believes that the effect on the Company's and Resources' respective
financial statements, if any, from the disposition of these matters will not be
material.
In February 1996, the cities of Wharton, Galveston and Pasadena filed suit,
for themselves and a proposed class, against the Company and Houston Industries
Finance Inc. (formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) citing
underpayment of municipal franchise fees. The plaintiffs claim, among other
things, that from 1957 to the present, franchise fees should have been paid on
sales taxes collected by Electric Operations on receipts from sales to other
utilities and on receipts from services as well as sales of electricity.
Plaintiffs advance their claims notwithstanding their failure to notice such
claims over the previous four decades. Because all of the franchise ordinances
affecting Electric Operations expressly impose fees only on receipts from sales
of electricity for consumption within a city, the Company regards plaintiffs'
allegations as spurious and is vigorously contesting the matter. The plaintiffs'
pleadings assert that their damages exceed $250 million. The District Court for
Harris County has granted a partial summary judgment in favor of the Company
dismissing all claims for franchise fees based on sales tax collections. Other
motions for partial summary judgment remain pending. Although the Company
believes the claims to be without merit, the Company cannot at this time
estimate a range of possible loss, if any, from the lawsuit, nor can any
assurance be given as to its ultimate outcome.
(16) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
(a) Foreign Currency Devaluation.
In January 1999, the Brazilian real was devalued and allowed to float
against other major currencies. The Company expects to take a charge against
first quarter earnings as a result of the Brazilian devaluation. The charge will
reflect the Company's proportionate share of the impact of the devaluation on
foreign denominated debt of Brazilian corporations in which the Company holds an
equity interest. The amount of the charge will not be known until the end of the
first quarter.
At December 31, 1998, one U.S. dollar could be exchanged for 1.21 Brazilian
reais. Using the exchange rate of 2.06 reais/dollar in effect at the end of
February, and the average exchange rate in effect since the end of the year, the
Company estimates that its share of the after-tax charge that would be recorded
by the Brazilian companies in which it owns an interest would be approximately
$125 million.
12
<PAGE> 24
COMPANY FIRST QUARTER 10-Q NOTES
(8) COMPANY/RESOURCES OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE TRUST PREFERRED
SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS HOLDING SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED
DEBENTURES OF THE COMPANY/RESOURCES
(a) Company.
In the first quarter of 1999, the Company, through the use of a
Delaware statutory business trust (REI Trust I), registered $500 million of
trust preferred securities and related junior subordinated debt securities. In
February 1999, REI Trust I issued $375 million of preferred securities to the
public and $11.6 million of common securities to the Company. The preferred
securities have a distribution rate of 7.20% payable quarterly in arrears, a
stated liquidation amount of $25 per preferred security and must be redeemed by
March 2048. REI Trust I used the proceeds to purchase $386.6 million aggregate
principal amount of subordinated debentures (REI Debentures) from the Company
having an interest rate and maturity date that correspond to the distribution
rate and mandatory redemption date of the preferred securities. The Company used
the proceeds from the sale of the REI Debentures for general corporate purposes,
including the repayment of short-term debt. The Company accounts for REI Trust I
as a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary. The REI Debentures are the trust's
sole asset and its entire operations. The Company has fully and unconditionally
guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, all of REI Trust I's obligations with
respect to the preferred securities. The preferred securities are mandatorily
redeemable upon the repayment of the REI Debentures at their stated maturity or
earlier redemption. Subject to certain limitations, the Company has the option
of deferring payments of interest on the REI Debentures. During any period of
deferral or event of default, the Company may not pay dividends on its capital
stock. Under the registration statement, $125 million of these securities remain
available for issuance. The issuance of all securities registered by the Company
and its affiliates is subject to market and other conditions.
For information regarding $250 million of preferred securities and $100
million of capital securities previously issued by statutory business trusts
formed by the Company, see Note 9(a) of the Company 10-K Notes. The sole asset
of each trust consists of junior subordinated debentures of the Company having
interest rates and maturity dates corresponding to each issue of preferred or
capital securities, and the principal amounts corresponding to the common and
preferred or capital securities issued by such trust.
13
<PAGE> 25
(9) LONG-TERM DEBT AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING
(a) Company.
(i) Consolidated Debt.
The Company's consolidated long-term and short-term debt outstanding is
summarized in the following table.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 31, 1999 DECEMBER 31, 1998
------------------------------- -------------------------------
LONG-TERM CURRENT LONG-TERM CURRENT
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Short-Term Borrowings (1):
Commercial Paper............................ $ 1,436 $ 1,360
Lines of Credit............................. 150
Resources Receivables Facility.............. 300 300
Notes Payable............................... 2 3
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total Short-Term Borrowings................... 1,738 1,813
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Long-Term Debt - net:
ACES $ 2,681 $ 2,350
Debentures (2)(3)........................... 1,476 1,482
First Mortgage Bonds (2).................... 1,716 150 1,866 170
Pollution Control Bonds..................... 581 581
Resources Medium-Term Notes (3)............. 176 178
Notes Payable (3)........................... 330 224 330 226
Capital Leases.............................. 14 1 14 1
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total Long-Term Debt.......................... 6,974 375 6,801 397
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total Long-Term and Short-Term Debt......... $ 6,974 $ 2,113 $ 6,801 $ 2,210
============= ============= ============= =============
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Includes amounts due within one year of the date noted.
(2) Includes unamortized discount related to debentures of approximately
$0.5 million at March 31, 1999 and $1 million at December 31, 1998 and
unamortized premium related to debentures of approximately $17 million
at March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively. The unamortized
discount related to first mortgage bonds was approximately $10 million
at March 31, 1999 and $10 million at December 31, 1998.
(3) Includes unamortized premium related to fair value adjustments of
approximately $17.6 million and $18.1 million for debentures at March
31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively. The unamortized premium
for Resources long-term notes was approximately $11 million and $12
million at March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively. The
unamortized premium for long-term and current notes payable was
approximately $3 million and $2 million at March 31, 1999 and $3
million each at December 31, 1998, respectively.
Consolidated maturities of long-term debt and sinking fund requirements
for the Company (including Resources) are approximately $222 million for the
remainder of 1999.
(ii) Financing Developments.
At March 31, 1999, a financing subsidiary of the Company had $1.293
billion in commercial paper borrowings supported by a $1.644 billion revolving
credit facility. At March 31, 1999, the weighted average interest rate of these
commercial paper borrowings was 5.12%.
14
<PAGE> 26
On March 2, 1999, another financing subsidiary of the Company terminated a
credit agreement under which it had borrowed $150 million. Funds for the
repayment of the loan were indirectly obtained from the issuance of commercial
paper by a separate financing subsidiary. For additional information regarding
the Company's and its subsidiaries' financings, see Note 8(c) and (d) of the
Company 10-K Notes.
In February 1999, the Company repaid at maturity $25.4 million and
$145.1 million of its Series A medium-term notes with interest rates of 9.85%
and 9.80%, respectively.
(11) ACQUISITIONS
On March 29, 1999, the Company and one of its subsidiaries, N.V.
Energieproduktiebedrijf UNA, a Dutch electric generating company (UNA), and the
shareholders of UNA entered into an agreement providing for the initial
acquisition of 40% of the capital stock of UNA by a subsidiary of the Company.
The purchase price for the initial 40% interest is Dutch guilders (NLG) 1.6
billion (U.S. $840 million). The purchase price for the remaining 60% of UNA is
approximately NLG 2.7 billion (U.S. $1.4 billion) and is expected to be paid no
later than December 31, 2006. Depending on the timing of regulatory approvals
and other conditions, the acquisition of the remaining interest could occur
significantly earlier than 2006.
All purchase price obligations are denominated in Dutch guilders. The
amounts shown above are subject to adjustment and assume a conversion rate of
NLG 1.88 per U.S. Dollar. It is anticipated that the closing of the initial 40%
interest will occur in June 1999, subject to receipt of various Dutch regulatory
approvals and the satisfaction of other closing conditions.
UNA is one of four large Dutch generators with approximately 3,400
megawatts of generating capacity, representing nearly 20% of the Dutch market.
It operates a mix of gas, coal and cogeneration plants in the Amsterdam and
Utrecht areas.
15
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 12
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
---------- ----------
1999 1999
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Income from Continuing Operations ........................................... $ 76,929 $ 113,798
Income Taxes from Continuing Operations ..................................... 64,905 122,732
Non-Utility Interest Capitalized ............................................
---------- ----------
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes ....................... $ 141,834 $ 236,530
========== ==========
Fixed Charges Interest ...................................................... $ 59,234 $ 119,067
Amortization of debt discount and expense ................................... 816 145
Portion of Rents Considered to Represent an Interest Factor ................. 4,537 9,670
---------- ----------
Total Fixed Charges ......................................................... $ 64,587 $ 128,882
========== ==========
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Fixed Charges ..... $ 206,421 $ 365,412
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges .......................................... 3.20 2.84
========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RESOURCES'
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001042773
<NAME> RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP.
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE> PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT> 1,383,285
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST> 1,509,156
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS> 1,546,364
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES> 2,320,348
<OTHER-ASSETS> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 6,759,153
<COMMON> 1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN> 2,463,831
<RETAINED-EARNINGS> 176,915
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ> 2,640,747
0
0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET> 1,497,674
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES> 300,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE> 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS> 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT> 200,491
0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS> 0
<LEASES-CURRENT> 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB> 2,120,241
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB> 6,759,153
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE> 4,258,954
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE> 64,905
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES> 4,063,828
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES> 4,063,828
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS> 195,126
<OTHER-INCOME-NET> 6,758
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN> 201,884
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE> 60,050
<NET-INCOME> 76,929
0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM> 76,929
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS> 0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS> 46,359<F1>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS> 137,306
<EPS-BASIC> 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.00
<FN>
<F1>TOTAL ANNUAL INTEREST CHARGES ON ALL BONDS IS AS OF YEAR-TO-DATE 06/30/99.
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 99B
[ITEMS INCORPORATED
FROM THE RESOURCES 10-K AND THE
RESOURCES FIRST QUARTER 10-Q]
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
(b) Resources.
For a description of certain legal and regulatory proceedings affecting
Resources, see Note 8(g) to Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements, which
note is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM. 7 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS
OF THE COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
Earnings for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future
earnings and results. The level of future earnings depends on numerous factors
including (i) the future growth in the Company's and its subsidiaries' energy
sales; (ii) weather; (iii) the success of the Company's and its subsidiaries'
entry into non-rate regulated businesses such as energy marketing and
international and domestic power projects; (iv) the Company's and its
subsidiaries' ability to respond to rapid changes in a competitive environment
and in the legislative and regulatory framework under which they have
traditionally operated; (v) rates of economic growth in the Company's and its
subsidiaries' service areas; (vi) the ability of the Company and its
subsidiaries to control costs and to maintain pricing structures that are both
attractive to customers and profitable; (vii) the outcome of future rate
proceedings; (viii) the effect that foreign exchange rate changes may have on
the Company's investments in international operations; and (ix) future
legislative initiatives.
In order to adapt to the increasingly competitive environment in which the
Company operates, the Company continues to evaluate a wide array of potential
business strategies, including business combinations or acquisitions involving
other utility or non-utility businesses or properties, internal restructuring,
reorganizations or dispositions of currently owned properties or currently
operating business units and new products, services and customer strategies. In
addition, the Company continues to engage in new business ventures, such as
electric power trading and marketing, which arise from competitive and
regulatory changes in the utility industry.
COMPETITION AND RESTRUCTURING OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY
The electric utility industry is becoming increasingly competitive due to
changing government regulations, technological developments and the availability
of alternative energy sources.
Long-Term Trends in Electric Utility Industry. The electric utility
industry historically has been composed of vertically integrated companies
providing electric service on an exclusive basis within governmentally-defined
geographic areas. Prices for electric service have typically been set by
governmental authorities under principles designed to provide the utility with
an opportunity to recover its cost of providing electric service plus a
reasonable return on its invested capital. Federal legislation and regulation as
well as legislative and regulatory initiatives in various states have encouraged
competition among electric utility and non-utility owned power generators. These
developments, combined with increased demand for lower-priced electricity and
technological advances in electric generation, have continued to move the
electric utility industry in the direction of more competition.
Based on a strategic review of the Company's business and of ongoing
developments in the electric utility and related industries regarding
competition, regulation and consolidation, the Company's management believes
that the electric utility industry will continue its path toward competition,
albeit on a state-by-state basis. The Company's management also believes the
business of electricity and natural gas are converging and consolidating and
these trends will alter the structure and business practices of companies
serving these markets in the future.
Competition in Wholesale Market. The Federal Energy Policy Act of 1992, the
Public Utility Regulatory Act of 1995 (now the Texas Utilities Code) and
regulations promulgated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
contain provisions intended to facilitate the development of a wholesale energy
market. Although Reliant Energy HL&P's wholesale sales traditionally have
accounted for less than 1% of its total revenues, the expansion of competition
in the wholesale electric market is significant in that it has increased the
range of non-utility competitors, such as exempt wholesale generators (EWGs) and
power marketers, in the Texas electric market as well as resulted in fundamental
changes in the operation of the state transmission grid.
In February 1996, the Texas Utility Commission adopted rules granting
third-party users of transmission systems open access to such systems at rates,
terms and conditions comparable to those available to utilities owning such
transmission assets. Under the Texas Utility Commission order implementing the
rule, Reliant Energy HL&P was required to separate, on an operational basis, its
wholesale power marketing operations from the operations of the transmission
grid and, for purposes of transmission pricing, to disclose each of its separate
costs of generation, transmission and distribution.
Within ERCOT, an independent system operator (ISO) manages the state's
electric grid, ensuring system reliability and providing non-discriminatory
transmission access to all power producers and traders. The ERCOT ISO, the first
in the nation, is a key component for implementing the Texas Utility
Commission's overall strategy to create a
<PAGE> 2
competitive wholesale market. ERCOT formed an ad hoc committee in early 1998 to
investigate the potential impacts of a competitive retail market on the ISO. The
ERCOT committee report was released in December 1998 and concluded that the
ISO's role and function would necessarily expand in a competitive retail
environment, but the changes required of the ISO to support retail choice should
not impede introduction of retail choice.
Competition in Retail Market. The Company estimates that, since 1978,
cogeneration projects representing approximately one-third of current total peak
generating capability have been built in the Houston area and that, as a result,
Reliant Energy HL&P has seen a reduction of approximately 2,500 MW in customer
load to self-generation. Reliant Energy HL&P has utilized flexible pricing to
respond to situations where large industrial customers have an alternative to
buying power from it, primarily by constructing their own generating facilities.
Under a tariff option approved by the Texas Utility Commission in 1995, Reliant
Energy HL&P was permitted to implement contracts based upon flexible pricing for
up to 700 MW. Currently, this rate is fully subscribed.
Texas law currently does not permit retail sales by unregulated entities
such as cogenerators. The Company anticipates that cogenerators and other
interests will continue to exert pressure to obtain access to the electric
transmission and distribution systems of regulated utilities for the purpose of
making retail sales to customers of regulated utilities.
Legislative Proposals. A number of proposals to restructure the electric
utility industry have been introduced in the 1999 session of the Texas
legislature. If adopted, legislation may permit and encourage alternative
suppliers to compete to serve Reliant Energy HL&P's current rate-regulated
retail customers. The various legislative proposals include provisions governing
recovery of stranded costs and permitting securitization of those costs;
freezing rates until 2002; requiring firm sales of energy to competing retail
electric providers; requiring disaggregation of generation, transmission and
distribution, and retail sales into separate companies and limiting the ability
of existing utilities' affiliates competing for retail electric customers on the
basis of price until they have lost a substantial percentage of their
residential and small commercial load to alternative retail providers. In
addition to the Texas legislative proposals, a number of federal legislative
proposals to promote retail electric competition or restructure the U.S.
electric utility industry have been introduced during the current congressional
session.
At this time, the Company is unable to make any prediction as to whether
any legislation to restructure electric operations or provide retail competition
will be enacted or as to the content or impact on the Company of any legislation
which may be enacted. However, because the proposed legislation is intended to
fundamentally restructure electric utility operations, it is likely that enacted
legislation would have a material impact on the Company.
Stranded Costs. As the U.S. electric utility industry continues its
transition to a more competitive environment, a substantial amount of fixed
costs previously approved for recovery under traditional utility regulatory
practices (including regulatory assets and liabilities) may become "stranded,"
i.e., unrecoverable at competitive market prices. The issue of stranded costs
could be particularly significant with respect to fixed costs incurred in
connection with the past construction of generation plants, such as nuclear
power plants, which, because of their high fixed costs, would not command the
same price for their output as they have in a regulated environment.
In January 1997, the Texas Utility Commission delivered a report to the
Texas legislature on stranded investments in the electric utility industry in
Texas (referred to by the Texas Utility Commission as "Excess Cost Over Market")
(ECOM). In April 1998, the Texas Utility Commission submitted to the Texas
Senate Interim Committee on Electric Utility Restructuring an updated study of
ECOM estimates. Assuming that retail competition is adopted at the beginning of
2002, the updated study estimated that the total amount of stranded costs for
all Texas electric utilities could be $4.5 billion. If instead, retail
competition is adopted one year later, the study estimates statewide ECOM to be
$3.3 billion. Estimates of ECOM vary widely and there is inherent uncertainty in
calculating these costs.
Transition Plan. In June 1998, the Texas Utility Commission approved the
Transition Plan filed by Reliant Energy HL&P in December 1997. The Transition
Plan included base rate credits to residential and certain commercial
2
<PAGE> 3
customers in 1998 and 1999, an overall rate of return cap formula for 1998 and
1999 and approval of accounting procedures designed to accelerate recovery of
stranded costs which may arise under restructuring legislation. The Transition
Plan permits the redirection of depreciation expense to generation assets that
Electric Operations otherwise would apply to transmission, distribution and
general plant assets. In addition, the Transition Plan provides that all
earnings above a 9.844% overall annual rate of return on invested capital be
used to recover Electric Operations' investment in generation assets. In
1998, Reliant Energy HL&P recorded an additional $194 million in depreciation
under the Transition Plan. Certain parties have appealed the order approving the
Transition Plan. For additional information, see Notes 1(f) and 3(b) to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
COMPETITION -- OTHER OPERATIONs
Natural Gas Distribution competes primarily with alternate energy sources
such as electricity and other fuel sources as well as with providers of energy
conservation products. In addition, as a result of federal regulatory changes
affecting interstate pipelines, it has become possible for other natural gas
suppliers and distributors to bypass Natural Gas Distribution's facilities and
market, sell and/or transport natural gas directly to small commercial and/or
large volume customers.
The Interstate Pipeline segment competes with other interstate and
intrastate pipelines in the transportation and storage of natural gas. The
principal elements of competition among pipelines are rates, terms of service,
and flexibility and reliability of service. Interstate Pipeline competes
indirectly with other forms of energy available to its customers, including
electricity, coal and fuel oils. The primary competitive factor is price.
Changes in the availability of energy and pipeline capacity, the level of
business activity, conservation and governmental regulations, the capability to
convert to alternative fuels, and other factors, including weather, affect the
demand for natural gas in areas served by Interstate Pipeline and the level of
competition for transport and storage services.
Reliant Energy Services competes for sales in its gas and power trading and
marketing business with other natural gas and power merchants, producers and
pipelines based on its ability to aggregate supplies at competitive prices from
different sources and locations and to efficiently utilize transportation from
third-party pipelines and transmission from electric utilities. Reliant Energy
Services also competes against other energy marketers on the basis of its
relative financial position and access to credit sources. This competitive
factor reflects the tendency of energy customers, natural gas suppliers and
natural gas transporters to seek financial guarantees and other assurances that
their energy contracts will be satisfied. As pricing information becomes
increasingly available in the energy trading and marketing business and as
deregulation in the electricity markets continues to accelerate, the Company
anticipates that Reliant Energy Services will experience greater competition and
downward pressure on per-unit profit margins in the energy marketing industry.
Competition for acquisition of international and domestic non-rate
regulated power projects is intense. International and Power Generation compete
against a number of other participants in the non-utility power generation
industry, some of which have greater financial resources and have been engaged
in non-utility power projects for periods longer than the Company and have
accumulated greater portfolios of projects. Competitive factors relevant to the
non-utility power industry include financial resources, access to non-recourse
funding and regulatory factors.
FLUCTUATIONS IN COMMODITY PRICES AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
For information regarding the Company's exposure to risk as a result of
fluctuations in commodity prices and derivative instruments, see "Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in Item 7A of this Report.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF ACES
The Company accounts for its investment in Time Warner Convertible
Preferred Stock (TW Preferred) under the cost method. As a result of the
Company's issuance of the ACES, a portion of the increase in the market value
above $27.7922 per share of Time Warner common stock (the security into which
the TW Preferred is convertible) (TW
3
<PAGE> 4
Common) results in unrealized accounting losses to the Company, pending the
conversion of the Company's TW Preferred into TW Common. For consistency
purposes, the TW Common and related per share prices retroactively reflect a 2
for 1 stock split effective December 15, 1998.
Prior to the conversion of the TW Preferred into TW Common, when the market
price of TW Common increases above $27.7922, the Company records in Other Income
(Expense) an unrealized, non-cash accounting loss for the ACES equal to the
aggregate amount of such increase as applicable to all ACES multiplied by
0.8264. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, this
accounting loss (which reflects the unrealized increase in the Company's
indebtedness with respect to the ACES) may not be offset by accounting
recognition of the increase in the market value of the TW Common that underlies
the TW Preferred. Upon conversion of the TW Preferred (which is anticipated to
occur in June 1999 when the preferential dividend on the TW Preferred expires),
the Company will begin recording future unrealized net changes in the market
prices of the TW Common and the ACES as a component of common stock equity and
other comprehensive income.
As of December 31, 1998, the market price of TW Common was $62.062 per
share. Accordingly, the Company recognized an increase of $1.2 billion in 1998
in the unrealized liability relating to its ACES indebtedness (which resulted in
an after-tax earnings reduction of $764 million or $2.69 basic earnings per
share in 1998). The Company believes that the cumulative unrealized loss for the
ACES of approximately $1.3 billion is more than economically offset by the
approximately $1.8 billion unrecorded unrealized gain at December 31, 1998
relating to the increase in the fair value of the TW Common underlying the
investment in TW Preferred since the date of its acquisition. Any gain related
to the increase in fair value of TW Common would be recognized as a component of
net income upon the sale of the TW Preferred or the shares of TW Common into
which such TW Preferred is converted. As of March 11, 1999, the price of TW
Common was $70.75 per share, which would have resulted in the Company
recognizing an additional increase of $329 million in the unrealized liability
represented by its indebtedness under the ACES. The related unrecorded
unrealized gain as of March 11, 1999 would have been computed as an additional
$398 million.
Excluding the unrealized, non-cash accounting loss for ACES, the Company's
retained earnings and total common stock equity would have been $2.3 billion and
$5.2 billion, respectively.
IMPACT OF THE YEAR 2000 ISSUE AND OTHER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Year 2000 Problem. At midnight on December 31, 1999, unless the proper
modifications have been made, the program logic in many of the world's computer
systems will start to produce erroneous results because, among other things, the
systems will incorrectly read the date "01/01/00" as being January 1 of the year
1900 or another incorrect date. In addition, certain systems may fail to detect
that the year 2000 is a leap year. Problems can also arise earlier than January
1, 2000, as dates in the next millennium are entered into non-Year 2000
compliant programs.
Compliance Program. In 1997, the Company initiated a corporate-wide Year
2000 project to address mainframe application systems, information technology
(IT) related equipment, system software, client-developed applications, building
controls and non-IT embedded systems such as process controls for energy
production and delivery. Incorporated into this project were Resources' and
other Company subsidiaries' mainframe applications, infrastructures, embedded
systems and client-developed applications that will not be migrated into
existing or planned Company or Resources systems prior to the year 2000. The
evaluation of Year 2000 issues included those related to significant customers,
key vendors, service suppliers and other parties material to the Company's and
its subsidiaries' operations. In the course of this evaluation, the Company has
sought written assurances from such third parties as to their state of Year 2000
readiness.
State of Readiness. Work has been prioritized in accordance with business
risk. The highest priority has been assigned to activities that would disrupt
the physical delivery of energy (Priority 1); activities that would impact back
office activities such as billing (Priority 2); activities that would cause
inconvenience or productivity loss in normal business operations (e.g. air
conditioning systems and elevators) (Priority 3). All business units have
completed an analysis of critical systems and equipment that control the
production and delivery of energy, as well as corporate, departmental and
personnel systems and equipment. The remediation and replacement work on the
majority of IT
4
<PAGE> 5
systems, non-IT systems and infrastructure began in the first quarter of 1998
and is expected to be completed by the second quarter of 1999. Testing of these
systems began in the second quarter of 1998 and is scheduled to be completed in
third quarter of 1999. The following table illustrates the Company's completion
percentages for the Year 2000 activities as of February 28, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3
-------------- -------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Assessment.............................................. 95% 86% 96%
Conversion.............................................. 86% 70% 91%
Testing................................................. 80% 61% 87%
Implementation.......................................... 76% 54% 75%
</TABLE>
Costs to Address Year 2000 Compliance Issues. Based on current internal
studies, as well as recently solicited bids from various computer software
vendors, the Company estimates that the total direct cost of resolving the Year
2000 issue with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries will be between $35
and $40 million. This estimate includes approximately $7 million related to
salaries and expenses of existing employees and approximately $3 million in
hardware purchases that the Company expects to capitalize. In addition, the $35
to $40 million estimate includes approximately $2 million spent prior to 1998
and approximately $12 million during 1998. The remaining costs related to
resolving the Year 2000 issue are expected to be expended in 1999.
The Company expects to fund these expenditures through internal sources.
In September 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with SAP America,
Inc. (SAP) to license SAP proprietary R/3 enterprise software. The licensed
software includes customer care, finance and accounting, human resources,
materials management and service delivery components. The Company's purchase of
this software license and related computer hardware is part of its response to
changes in the electric utility and energy services industries, as well as
changes in the Company's businesses and operations resulting from the
acquisition of Resources and the Company's expansion into the energy trading and
marketing business. Although it is anticipated that the implementation of the
SAP system will have the incidental effect of negating the need to modify many
of the Company's computer systems to accommodate the Year 2000 problem, the
Company does not deem the costs of the SAP system as directly related to its
Year 2000 compliance program. Portions of the SAP system were implemented in
December 1998 and March 1999, and it is expected that the final portion of the
SAP system will be fully implemented by July 2000. The estimated costs of
implementing the SAP system is approximately $182 million, inclusive of internal
costs. In 1998, the Company and its subsidiaries spent $108 million of such
costs. In 1999, the Company and its subsidiaries expect to spend $59 million
with the remaining amounts to be spent in 2000.
The estimated Year 2000 project costs do not give effect to any future
corporate acquisitions or divestitures made by the Company or its subsidiaries.
Risks and Contingency Plans. The major systems which pose the greatest Year
2000 risks for the Company and its subsidiaries if implementation of the Year
2000 compliance program is not successful are the process control systems for
energy delivery systems; the time in use, demand and recorder metering system
for commercial and industrial customers; the outage analysis system; and the
power billing systems. The potential problems related to these systems are
temporary electric service interruptions to customers, temporary interruptions
in revenue data gathering and temporary poor customer relations resulting from
delayed billing. Although the Company does not believe that this scenario will
occur, the Company has considerable experience responding to emergency
situations, including computer failure. Existing emergency operations, disaster
recovery and business continuation plans are being enhanced to ensure
preparedness and to mitigate the long-term effect of such a scenario.
The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) is coordinating
electric utility industry contingency planning on a national level. Additional
contingency planning is being done at the regional electric reliability council
level. Reliant Energy HL&P filed a draft Year 2000 Contingency Plan with NERC
and with the Texas Utility Commission in December 1998. The draft plan addresses
restoration of electric service and related business processes, and is designed
to work in conjunction with the Emergency Operating Plan and with the plans of
NERC and ERCOT.
5
<PAGE> 6
A final contingency plan is scheduled to be complete by June 30, 1999. In
addition, Reliant Energy HL&P will participate in industry preparedness drills,
such as the two NERC drills scheduled to be held on April 9, 1999 and September
9, 1999.
The existing business continuity disaster recovery and emergency operations
plans are being reviewed and enhanced, and where necessary, additional plans
will be developed to include mitigation strategies and action plans specifically
addressing potential Year 2000 scenarios. The expected completion date for these
plans is June 30, 1999.
In order to assist in preparing for and mitigating the foregoing scenarios,
the Company intends to complete all mission critical Year 2000 remediation and
testing activity by the end of the second quarter of 1999. In addition, the
Company has initiated Year 2000 communications with significant customers, key
vendors, service suppliers and other parties material to the Company's
operations and is diligently monitoring the progress of such third parties' Year
2000 projects. The Company expects to meet with mission-critical third parties,
including suppliers, in order to ascertain and assess the relative risks of
Year-2000-related issues, and to mitigate such risks. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Company cautions that (i) the nature of testing is such that it
cannot comprehensively address all future combinations of dates and events and
(ii) it is impossible for the Company to assess with precision or certainty the
compliance of third parties with Year 2000 remediation efforts. Due to the
speculative and uncertain nature of contingency planning, there can be no
assurance that such plans actually will be sufficient to reduce the risk of
material impacts on the Company's and its subsidiaries' operations.
RISKS OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
The Company's international operations are subject to various risks
incidental to investing or operating in emerging market countries. These risks
include political risks, such as governmental instability, and economic risks,
such as fluctuations in currency exchange rates, restrictions on the
repatriation of foreign earnings and/or restrictions on the conversion of local
currency earnings into U.S. dollars. The Company's international operations are
also highly capital intensive and, thus, dependent to a significant extent on
the continued availability of bank financing and other sources of capital on
commercially acceptable terms.
Impact of Currency Fluctuations on Company Earnings. The Company, through
Reliant Energy International's subsidiaries, owns 11.69% of the stock of Light
and, through its investment in Light, an 8.753% interest in the stock of
Metropolitana Electricidade de Sao Paulo S.A. (Metropolitana). The Company
accounts for its investment in Light under the equity method of accounting and
records its proportionate share, based on stock ownership, in the net income of
Light and its affiliates (including Metropolitana) as part of the Company's
consolidated net income.
At December 31, 1998, Light and Metropolitana had total borrowings of
approximately $3.2 billion denominated in non-local currencies. Because of the
devaluation of the Brazilian real subsequent to December 31, 1998, Light and
Metropolitana are expected to record a charge to March 31, 1999 earnings that
reflects the increase in the liability represented by their non-local currency
denominated bank borrowings relative to the Brazilian real. Because the Company
uses the Brazilian real as the functional currency in which it reports Light's
equity earnings, the resulting decrease in Light's earnings will also be
reflected in the Company's consolidated earnings to the extent of the Company's
11.69% ownership interest in Light. At December 31, 1998, one U. S. dollar could
be exchanged for 1.21 Brazilian reais. Using the exchange rate of 2.06 Brazilian
reais in effect at the end of February, and the average exchange rate in effect
since the end of the year, the Company estimates that its share of the after-tax
charge to be recorded by Light would be approximately $125 million. This
estimate does not reflect the possibility of additional fluctuations in the
exchange rate and does not include other non-debt-related impacts of Brazil's
currency devaluation on Light's and Metropolitana's future earnings.
6
<PAGE> 7
None of Light's or Metropolitana's tariff adjustment mechanisms are
directly indexed to the U.S. dollar or other non-local currencies. Each company
currently is evaluating various options including regulatory rate relief to
mitigate the impact of the devaluation of the Brazilian real. For example, the
long-term concession contracts under which Light and Metropolitana operate
contain mechanisms for adjusting electricity tariffs to reflect changes in
operating costs resulting from inflation. If the devaluation of the Brazilian
real results in an increase in the local rate of inflation and if an adjustment
to tariff rates is made promptly to reflect such increase, the Company believes
that the financial results of Light and Metropolitana should be protected, at
least in part, from the effects of devaluation. However, there can be no
assurance the implementation of such tariff adjustments will be timely or that
the economic impact of the devaluation will be completely reflected in increased
inflation rates.
Certain of Reliant Energy International's other foreign electric
distribution companies have incurred U.S. dollar and other non-local currency
indebtedness (approximately $71 million at December 31, 1998). For further
analysis of foreign currency fluctuations in the Company's earnings and cash
flows, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk --
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk" in Item 7A of this Form 10-K.
Impact of Foreign Currency Devaluation on Project Capital Resources. In the
first quarter of 1999, approximately $117 million of Metropolitana's U.S. dollar
denominated debt will mature. In the second quarter of 1999, approximately $980
million of Light's and approximately $696 million of Metropolitana's U.S. and
non-local currency denominated bank debt will mature. In March 1999, Light
refinanced approximately $130 million of its U.S. dollar denominated debt
through a local - currency denominated loan. The ability of Light and
Metropolitana to repay or refinance their debt obligations at maturity is
dependent on many factors, including local and international economic conditions
prevailing at the time such debt matures.
If economic conditions in the international markets continue to be
unsettled or deteriorate, it is possible that Light, Metropolitana and the other
foreign electric distribution companies in which the Company holds investments
might encounter difficulties in refinancing their debt (both local currency and
non-local currency borrowings) on terms and conditions that are commercially
acceptable to them and their shareholders. In such circumstances, in lieu of
declaring a default or extending the maturity, it is possible that lenders might
seek to require, among other things, higher borrowing rates, and additional
equity contributions and/or increased levels of credit support from the
shareholders of such entities. The availability or terms of refinancing such
debt cannot be assured.
Currency fluctuation and instability affecting Latin America may also
adversely affect Reliant Energy International's ability to refinance its equity
investments with debt. In 1998, Reliant Energy International invested $411
million in Colombia and El Salvador. As of January 1999, $100 million of these
investments were refinanced with debt. Reliant Energy International intends to
refinance approximately $75 million more of such initial investments with debt.
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPENDITURES
The Company and its subsidiaries, including Resources, are subject to
numerous environmental laws and regulations, which require them to incur
substantial costs to operate existing facilities, construct and operate new
facilities, and mitigate or remove the effect of past operations on the
environment.
Clean Air Act Expenditures. The Company expects the majority of capital
expenditures associated with environmental matters to be incurred by Electric
Operations in connection with new emission limitations under the Federal Clean
Air Act (Clean Air Act) for oxides of nitrogen (NOx). The standards applicable
to Electric Operations' generating units in the Houston, Texas area will become
effective in November 1999. NOx reduction costs incurred by Electric Operations
totaled approximately $7 million in 1998. The Company estimates that Electric
Operations will incur approximately $8 million in 1999 and $10 million in 2000
for such expenditures. The Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission
(TNRCC) has indicated that additional NOx reduction will be required after 2000;
however, since the magnitude and timing of these reductions have not yet been
established, it is impossible for the Company to estimate a reasonable range of
such expenditures at this time.
7
<PAGE> 8
In 1998, the Wholesale Energy spent approximately $100,000 in order to
comply with NOx reduction with respect to Southern California generating
facilities acquired by Power Generation from Southern California Edison (SCE) in
1998. In 1999, based on existing requirements, the Company projects that it will
spend an additional $100,000 on NOx reduction standards with respect to such
plants and approximately $1 million on continuous emission monitoring system
upgrades for such plants.
Site Remediation Expenditures. From time to time the Company and its
subsidiaries have received notices from regulatory authorities or others
regarding their status as potentially responsible parties in connection with
sites found to require remediation due to the presence of environmental
contaminants.
The Company's identified sites with respect to which it may be claimed to
have a remediation liability include several sites for which there is a lack of
current available information, including the nature and magnitude of
contamination, and the extent, if any, to which the Company may be held
responsible for contributing to any costs incurred for remediating these sites.
Thus, no reasonable estimate of cleanup costs can now be made for these sites.
Based on currently available information, the Company believes that such costs
ultimately will not materially affect its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance, however, that future
developments, including additional information about existing sites or the
identification of new sites, will not require material revisions to such
estimates. For information about specific sites that are the subject of
remediation claims, see Note 12(h) to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements and Note 8(g) to Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements, each
of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Mercury Contamination. Like other natural gas pipelines, Resources'
pipeline operations have in the past employed elemental mercury in meters used
on its pipelines. Although the mercury has now been removed from the meters, it
is possible that small amounts of mercury have been spilled at some of those
sites in the course of normal maintenance and replacement operations and that
such spills have contaminated the immediate area around the meters with
elemental mercury. Such contamination has been found by Resources at some sites
in the past, and Resources has conducted remediation at sites found to be
contaminated. Although Resources is not aware of additional specific sites, it
is possible that other contaminated sites exist and that remediation costs will
be incurred for such sites. Although the total amount of such costs cannot be
known at this time, based on experience of Resources and others in the natural
gas industry to date and on the current regulations regarding remediation of
such sites, the Company and Resources believe that the cost of any remediation
of such sites will not be material to the Company's or Resources' financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other. In addition, the Company has been named as a defendant in litigation
related to such sites and in recent years has been named, along with numerous
others, as a defendant in several lawsuits filed by a large number of
individuals who claim injury due to exposure to asbestos while working at sites
along the Texas Gulf Coast. Most of these claimants have been workers who
participated in construction of various industrial facilities, including power
plants, and some of the claimants have worked at locations owned by the Company.
The Company anticipates that additional claims like those received may be
asserted in the future and intends to continue its practice of vigorously
contesting claims which it does not consider to have merit. Although their
ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, the Company does not believe,
based on its experience to date, that these matters, either individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
OTHER CONTINGENCIES
For a description of certain other legal and regulatory proceedings
affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, see Notes 3, 4, 5 and 12 to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 8 to Resources'
Consolidated Financial Statements, which notes are incorporated herein by
reference.
8
<PAGE> 9
NEW ACCOUNTING ISSUES
In 1998, the Company and Resources adopted SFAS No. 130, "Reporting
Comprehensive Income" (SFAS No. 130), SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS No. 131) and SFAS No. 132,
"Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits" (SFAS
No. 132). For further discussion of these accounting statements, see Note 15 to
the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 9 to Resources'
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2000, the Company and Resources expect to adopt SFAS No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133),
which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
(collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. The
Company is in the process of determining the effect of adoption of SFAS No. 133
on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 1998, The Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board reached consensus on Issue 98-10, "Accounting for
Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" (EITF Issue
98-10). EITF Issue 98-10 requires energy trading contracts to be recorded at
fair value on the balance sheet, with the changes in fair value included in
earnings. EITF Issue 98-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 1998. The Company expects to adopt EITF Issue 98-10 in the first
quarter of 1999. The Company does not expect the implementation of EITF Issue
98-10 to be material to its consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company and its subsidiaries have long-term debt, Company/ Resources
obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts
holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company/Resources (Trust
Securities), securities held in the Company's nuclear decommissioning trust,
bank facilities, certain lease obligations and interest rate swaps which subject
the Company, Resources and certain of their subsidiaries to the risk of loss
associated with movements in market interest rates.
At December 31, 1998, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries had
issued fixed-rate long-term debt (excluding ACES) and Trust Securities
aggregating $5.0 billion in principal amount and having a fair value of $5.2
billion. These instruments are fixed-rate and, therefore, do not expose the
Company and its subsidiaries to the risk of earnings loss due to changes in
market interest rates (see Notes 8 and 9 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements). However, the fair value of these instruments would increase by
approximately $260.6 million if interest rates were to decline by 10% from their
levels at December 31, 1998. In general, such an increase in fair value would
impact earnings and cash flows only if the Company and its subsidiaries were to
reacquire all or a portion of these instruments in the open market prior to
their maturity.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries' floating-rate obligations
aggregated $1.8 billion at December 31, 1998 (see Note 8 to the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements), inclusive of (i) amounts borrowed under
short-term and long-term credit facilities of the Company and its subsidiaries
(including the issuance of commercial paper supported by such facilities), (ii)
borrowings underlying Resources' receivables facility and (iii) amounts subject
to a master leasing agreement of Resources under which lease payments vary
depending on short-term interest rates. These floating-rate obligations expose
the Company, Resources and their subsidiaries to the risk of increased interest
and lease expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If the
floating rates were to increase by 10% from December 31, 1998 levels, the
Company's consolidated interest expense and expense under operating leases would
increase by a total of approximately $0.9 million each month in which such
increase continued.
As discussed in Notes 1(o), 4(c) and 13 to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements, the Company contributes $14.8 million per year to a trust
established to fund the Company's share of the decommissioning costs for the
South Texas Project. The securities held by the trust for decommissioning costs
had an estimated fair value of $119.1 million as of December 31, 1998, of which
approximately 44% were fixed-rate debt securities that subject the Company to
risk of loss of fair value with movements in market interest rates. If interest
rates were to increase by 10% from their levels at December 31, 1998, the
decrease in fair value of the fixed-rate debt securities would not be material
to the Company. In addition, the risk of an economic loss is mitigated at this
time as a result of the Company's regulated status. Any unrealized gains or
losses are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 71 as a regulatory
asset/liability because the Company believes that its future contributions which
are currently recovered through the rate-making process will be adjusted for
these gains and losses.
9
<PAGE> 10
Certain subsidiaries of the Company have entered into interest rate swaps
for the purpose of decreasing the amount of debt subject to interest rate
fluctuations. At December 31, 1998, these interest rate swaps had an aggregate
notional amount of $75.4 million, which the Company could terminate at a cost of
$3.2 million (see Notes 2 and 13 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements). An increase of 10% in the December 31, 1998 level of interest rates
would not increase the cost of termination of the swaps by a material amount to
the Company. Swap termination costs would impact the Company's and its
subsidiaries' earnings and cash flows only if all or a portion of the swap
instruments were terminated prior to their expiration.
As discussed in Note 8(h) to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, Resources sold $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 6 3/8%
TERM Notes which included an embedded option to remarket the securities. The
option is expected to be exercised in the event that the ten-year Treasury rate
in 2003 is below 5.66%. At December 31, 1998, the Company could terminate the
option at a cost of $30.7 million. A decrease of 10% in the December 31, 1998
level of interest rates would not increase the cost of termination of the option
by a material amount to the Company.
The change in exposure to loss in earnings and cash flows related to
interest rate risk from December 31, 1997 to December 31, 1998 is not material
to the Company.
EQUITY MARKET RISK
The Company holds an investment in TW Preferred which is convertible into
Time Warner common stock (TW Common) as described in "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company --
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries --
Accounting Treatment of ACES" in Item 7 of this Form 10-K. As a result, the
Company is exposed to losses in the fair value of this security. For purposes of
analyzing market risk in this Item 7A, the Company assumed that the TW Preferred
was converted into TW Common. In addition, Resources' investment in the common
stock of Itron, Inc. (Itron) exposes the Company and Resources to losses in the
fair value of Itron common stock. A 10% decline in the market value per share of
TW Common and Itron common stock from the December 31, 1998 levels would result
in a loss in fair value of approximately $284.4 million and $1.1 million,
respectively.
The Company's and its subsidiaries' ability to realize gains and losses
related to the TW Preferred and the Itron common stock is limited by the
following: (i) the TW Preferred is not publicly traded and its sale is subject
to certain limitations and (ii) the market for the common stock of Itron is
fairly illiquid.
The ACES expose the Company to accounting losses as the Company is required
to record in Other Income (Expense) an unrealized accounting loss equal to (i)
the aggregate amount of the increase in the market price of TW Common above
$27.7922 as applicable to all ACES multiplied by (ii) 0.8264. Prior to the
conversion of the TW Preferred into TW Common, such loss would affect earnings.
After conversion, such loss would be recognized as an adjustment to common stock
equity through a reduction of other comprehensive income. However, there would
be an offsetting increase in common stock equity through an increase in
accumulated other comprehensive income on the Company's Statements of
Consolidated Retained Earnings and Comprehensive Income for the fair value
increase in the investment in TW Common. For additional information on the
accounting treatment of the ACES and related accounting losses recorded in 1998,
see Note 1(n) to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. An increase of
15% in the price of the TW Common above its December 31, 1998 market value of
$62.062 per share would result in the recognition of an additional unrealized
accounting loss (net of tax) of approximately $229.1 million. The Company
believes that this additional unrealized loss for the ACES would be more than
economically hedged by the unrecorded unrealized gain relating to the increase
in the fair value of the TW Common underlying the investment in TW Preferred
since the date of its acquisition.
For a discussion of the non-cash, unrealized accounting loss recorded in
1998 and 1997 related to the ACES, see "-- Certain Factors Affecting Future
Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries -- Accounting Treatment of ACES" in
Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
As discussed above under "-- Interest Rate Risk," the Company contributes
to a trust established to fund the Company's share of the decommissioning costs
for the South Texas Project which held debt and equity securities as of December
31, 1998. The equity securities expose the Company to losses in fair value. If
the market prices of the individual equity securities were to decrease by 10%
from their levels at December 31, 1998, the resulting loss in fair value of
these securities would not be material to the Company. Currently, the risk of an
economic loss is mitigated as a result of the Company's regulated status as
discussed above under "--Interest Rate Risk."
10
<PAGE> 11
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK
As further described in "Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the
Company and Its Subsidiaries -- Risks of International Operations" in Item 7 of
this Form 10-K, the Company, through Reliant Energy International invests in
certain foreign operations which to date have been primarily in South America.
As of December 31, 1998, the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets reflected
$1.1 billion of foreign investments, a substantial portion of which represent
investments accounted for under the equity method. These foreign investments
expose the Company to risk of loss in earnings and cash flows due to the
fluctuation in foreign currencies relative to the Company's consolidated
reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. The Company accounts for adjustments
resulting from translation of its investments with functional currencies other
than the U.S. dollar as a charge or credit directly to a separate component of
stockholders' equity. For further discussion of the accounting for foreign
currency adjustments, see Note 1(p) in the Notes to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements. The cumulative translation loss of $34 million, recorded
as of December 31, 1998, will be realized as a loss in earnings and cash flows
only upon the disposition of the related investment. The foreign currency loss
in earnings and cash flows related to debt obligations held by foreign
operations in currencies other than their own functional currencies was not
material to the Company as of December 31, 1997.
In addition, certain of Reliant Energy International's foreign operations
have entered into obligations in currencies other than their own functional
currencies which expose the Company to a loss in earnings. In such cases, as the
respective investment's functional currency devalues relative to the non-local
currencies, the Company will record its proportionate share of its investments'
foreign currency transaction losses related to the non-local currency
denominated debt. At December 31, 1998, Light and Metropolitana had borrowings
of approximately $3.2 billion denominated in non-local currencies. Because of
the devaluation of the Brazilian real subsequent to December 31, 1998, Light and
Metropolitana are expected to record a charge to earnings for the quarter ended
March 31, 1999, primarily related to foreign currency transaction losses on
their non-local currency denominated debt. For further discussion and analysis
of the possible effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, see
"Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and Its Subsidiaries
- -- Risks of International Operations" in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
The company attempts to manage and mitigate this foreign risk by properly
balancing the higher cost of financing with local denominated debt against the
risk of devaluation of that local currency and including a measure of the risk
of devaluation in all its financial plans. In addition, where possible, Reliant
Energy International attempts to structure its tariffs and revenue contracts to
ensure some measure of adjustment due to changes in inflation and currency
exchange rates; however, there can be no assurance that such efforts will
compensate for the full effect of currency devaluation, if any.
ENERGY COMMODITY PRICE RISK
As further described in Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, certain of the Company's subsidiaries utilize a variety of
derivative financial instruments (Derivatives), including swaps and
exchange-traded futures and options, as part of the Company's overall hedging
strategies and for trading purposes. To reduce the risk from the adverse effect
of market fluctuations in the price of electric power, natural gas, crude oil
and refined products and related transportation, Resources and certain
subsidiaries of the Company and Resources enter into futures transactions,
forward contracts, swaps and options (Energy Derivatives) in order to hedge
certain commodities in storage, as well as certain expected purchases, sales and
transportation of energy commodities (a portion of which are firm commitments at
the inception of the hedge). The Company's policies prohibit the use of
leveraged financial instruments. In addition, Reliant Energy Services, a
subsidiary of Resources, maintains a portfolio of Energy Derivatives to provide
price risk management services and for trading purposes (Trading Derivatives).
The Company uses value-at-risk and a sensitivity analysis method for
assessing the market risk of its derivatives.
11
<PAGE> 12
With respect to the Energy Derivatives (other than Trading Derivatives)
held by subsidiaries of the Company and Resources as of December 31, 1998, a
decrease of 10% in the market prices of natural gas and electric power from
year-end levels would decrease the fair value of these instruments by
approximately $3 million. As of December 31, 1997, a decrease of 10% in the
prices of natural gas would have resulted in a loss of $7 million in fair values
of the Energy Derivatives (other than for trading purposes).
The above analysis of the Energy Derivatives utilized for hedging purposes
does not include the favorable impact that the same hypothetical price movement
would have on the Company's and its subsidiaries' physical purchases and sales
of natural gas and electric power to which the hedges relate. The portfolio of
Energy Derivatives held for hedging purposes is no greater than the notional
quantity of the expected or committed transaction volume of physical commodities
with equal and opposite commodity price risk for the same time periods.
Furthermore, the Energy Derivative portfolio is managed to complement the
physical transaction portfolio, reducing overall risks within limits. Therefore,
the adverse impact to the fair value of the portfolio of Energy Derivatives held
for hedging purposes associated with the hypothetical changes in commodity
prices referenced above would be offset by a favorable impact on the underlying
hedged physical transactions, assuming (i) the Energy Derivatives are not closed
out in advance of their expected term, (ii) the Energy Derivatives continue to
function effectively as hedges of the underlying risk and (iii) as applicable,
anticipated transactions occur as expected.
The disclosure with respect to the Energy Derivatives relies on the
assumption that the contracts will exist parallel to the underlying physical
transactions. If the underlying transactions or positions are liquidated prior
to the maturity of the Energy Derivatives, a loss on the financial instruments
may occur, or the options might be worthless as determined by the prevailing
market value on their termination or maturity date, whichever comes first.
With respect to the Trading Derivatives held by Reliant Energy Services,
consisting of natural gas, electric power, crude oil and refined products,
physical forwards, swaps, options and exchange-traded futures, this subsidiary
is exposed to losses in fair value due to changes in the price and volatility of
the underlying derivatives. During the year ended December 31, 1998 and 1997,
the highest, lowest and average monthly value-at-risk in the Trading Derivative
portfolio was less than $5 million at a 95% confidence level and for a holding
period of one business day. The Company uses the variance/covariance method for
calculating the value-at-risk and includes the delta approximation for options
positions.
The Company has established a Corporate Risk Oversight Committee comprised
of corporate and business segment officers that oversees all corporate price and
credit risk activities, including derivative trading activities discussed above.
The committee's duties are to establish the Company's policies and to monitor
and ensure compliance with risk management policies and procedures and the
trading limits established by the Company's board of directors.
12
<PAGE> 13
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF RELIANT
ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES.
The following narrative and analysis should be read in combination with the
consolidated financial statements and notes (Resources' Consolidated Financial
Statements) of Reliant Energy Resources Corp. (formerly NorAm Energy Corp.)
(Resources) contained in Item 8 of the Form 10-K of Resources.
RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP.
On August 6, 1997 (Acquisition Date), the former parent corporation (Former
Parent) of Houston Industries Incorporated d/b/a Reliant Energy, Incorporated
(Reliant Energy) merged with and into Reliant Energy, and NorAm Energy Corp.
(Former Resources) merged with and into Resources. Effective upon the mergers
(collectively, the Merger), each outstanding share of common stock of Former
Parent was converted into one share of common stock (including associated
preference stock purchase rights) of Reliant Energy, and each outstanding share
of common stock of Former Resources was converted into the right to receive
$16.3051 cash or 0.74963 shares of common stock of Reliant Energy. The aggregate
consideration paid to Former Resources stockholders in connection with the
Merger consisted of $1.4 billion in cash and 47.8 million shares of Reliant
Energy's common stock valued at approximately $1.0 billion. The overall
transaction was valued at $4.0 billion consisting of $2.4 billion for Former
Resources' common stock and common stock equivalents and $1.6 billion of Former
Resources debt ($1.3 billion of which was long-term debt.)
The Merger was recorded under the purchase method of accounting with assets
and liabilities of Resources reflected at their estimated fair values as of the
Acquisition Date, resulting in a "new basis" of accounting. In Resources'
Consolidated Financial Statements, periods which reflect the new basis of
accounting are labeled as "Current Resources" and periods which do not reflect
the new basis of accounting are labeled as "Former Resources." Former Resources'
Statement of Consolidated Income for the seven months ended July 31, 1997
included certain adjustments from August 1, 1997 to the Acquisition Date for
pre-merger transactions.
Effective January 1, 1998, Resources adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS No. 131). Because
Resources is a wholly owned subsidiary of Reliant Energy, Resources'
determination of reportable segments considers the strategic operating units
under which Reliant Energy manages sales of various products and services to
wholesale or retail customers in differing regulatory environments. In
accordance with SFAS No. 131, Reliant Energy has identified the following
reportable segments: Electric Operations, Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate
Pipelines, Wholesale Energy Marketing and Generation (Wholesale Energy),
International and Corporate. Of these segments, the following operations are
conducted by Resources: Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate Pipelines,
Wholesale Energy (which includes the energy trading and marketing operations and
natural gas gathering operations of the Wholesale Energy segment but excludes
the operations of Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc.) and Corporate
(excluding the impact of ACES).
Resources meets the conditions specified in General Instruction I to Form
10-K and is thereby permitted to use the reduced disclosure format for wholly
owned subsidiaries of reporting companies specified therein. Accordingly,
Resources has omitted from this Combined Annual Report the information called
for by Item 4 (submission of matters to a vote of security holders), Item 10
(directors and executive officers), Item 11 (executive compensation), Item 12
(security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management) and Item 13
(certain relationships and related transactions) of Form 10-K. In lieu of the
information called for by Item 6 (selected financial data) and Item 7
(management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations) of Form 10-K, Resources has included the following Management's
Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations to explain material changes in
the amount of revenue and expense items of Resources between 1998 and 1997.
Reference is hereby made to Item 1 (business), Item 2 (properties), Item 3
(legal proceedings), Item 5 (market for common equity and related stockholder
matters), Item 7A (quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk)
and Item 9 (changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and
financial disclosure) of this Combined Annual Report for additional information
regarding Resources required by the reduced disclosure format of General
Instruction I to Form 10-K.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Seasonality and Other Factors. Resources' results of operations are
affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for and, to a lesser
extent, the price of natural gas. Resources' results of operations are also
affected by,
<PAGE> 14
among other things, the actions of various federal and state governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over rates charged by Resources and its
subsidiaries, competition in Resources' various business operations, debt
service costs and income tax expense. For a discussion of certain other factors
that may affect Resources' future earnings see "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company --
Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries
- -- Competition -- Other Operations"; "-- Impact of the Year 2000 Issue and Other
System Implementation Issues" and "-- Environmental Expenditures -- Mercury
Contamination" in Item 7 of Reliant Energy's Form 10-K.
Accounting Impact of the Merger. The Merger created a new basis of
accounting for Resources, resulting in new carrying values for certain of
Resources' assets, liabilities and equity commencing upon the Acquisition Date.
Resources' financial statements for periods subsequent to the Acquisition Date
are not comparable to prior periods because of the following purchase
accounting adjustments:
1. The impact of the amortization of newly-recognized goodwill ($39.4
million);
2. The amortization (to interest expense) of the revaluation of
long-term debt ($9.8 million);
3. The removal of the amortization (to operating expense) previously
associated with the pension and postretirement obligations ($2.1
million); and
4. The deferred income tax expense associated with these adjustments
($4.9 million).
Interest expense and related debt incurred by Reliant Energy to fund the cash
portion of the purchase consideration has not been pushed down to Resources and
its subsidiaries.
Because results of operations and other financial information for periods
before and after the Acquisition Date are not comparable, Resources is
presenting certain financial data on: (i) an actual basis for Resources for
1998 and 1997 and (ii) a pro forma basis for 1997 as if the Merger had taken
place at the beginning of the period. These results do not necessarily reflect
the results which would have been obtained if the Merger had actually occurred
on the dates indicated or the results that may be expected in the future.
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on an
actual and pro forma basis for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997,
followed by a discussion of significant variances in period-to-period results:
SELECTED FINANCIAL RESULTS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNAUDITED
ACTUAL PRO FORMA (1)
--------------------------------------------- --------------
YEAR FIVE MONTHS SEVEN MONTHS YEAR ACTUAL TO
ENDED ENDED ENDED ENDED PRO FORMA
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, JULY 31, DECEMBER 31, PERCENTAGE
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- CHANGE
1998 1997 1997 1997
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating Revenues .................. $ 6,758,412 $ 2,526,182 $ 3,313,591 $ 5,839,773 16%
Operating Expenses .................. 6,448,107 2,434,282 3,141,295 5,597,716 15%
Operating Income .................... 310,305 91,900 172,296 242,057 28%
Merger Transaction Costs (2) ........ 1,144 17,256
Consolidated ........................ 310,305 90,756 155,040 242,057 28%
Interest Expense, Net ............... 111,337 47,490 78,660 112,996 (1%)
Distributions on Subsidiary Trust
Securities .......................... 632 279 6,317 1,479 (57%)
Other (Income) and Deductions ....... (7,318) (2,243) (7,210) (9,453) (23%)
Income Tax Expense .................. 111,830 24,383 31,398 71,093 57%
Extraordinary (Gain), Less Taxes .... (237)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net Income ........................ $ 93,824 $ 20,847 $ 46,112 $ 65,942 42%
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 15
- ----------
(1) Pro forma results reflect purchase accounting adjustments as if the Merger
had occurred on January 1, 1997.
(2) For expenses associated with the completion of the business combination
with Reliant Energy, see Note 1(o) to Resources' Consolidated Financial
Statements.
1998 Compared to 1997 (Actual). Resources' consolidated net income for 1998 was
$94 million compared to consolidated net income of $67 million in 1997. The
increase in net income for 1998 as compared to 1997 was due to increased
operating income from several business segments as discussed below, partially
offset by a decrease in operating income from Resources' Natural Gas
Distribution segment due to the effects of warm weather. Also contributing to
the increase in net income was a reduction in interest expense due to the
refinancing of debt and reduced interest expense due to debt fair value
devaluation at the time of the Merger.
Resources operating revenues for 1998 were $6.8 billion as compared to
$5.8 billion in 1997. The $900 million, or 16% increase was primarily
attributable to a $1.4 billion increase in wholesale trading revenue. Wholesale
trading revenue increased due to increased power and natural gas trading
volumes. The increase in trading revenues was offset by reduced revenues at
Resources' Natural Gas Distribution unit of approximately $400 million,
principally due to warmer weather.
Resources operating expenses for 1998 were $6.4 billion compared to $5.6
billion in 1997. The $800 million, or 16% increase was primarily due to
increased natural gas and purchased power expenses associated with increased
wholesale trading activities. The increase in operating expenses was offset by
decreased natural gas purchases at Resources' Natural Gas Distribution unit
because of lower volumes resulting from the warmer weather.
Operating income increased in 1998 by $65 million over 1997 due to improved
operating results at Interstate Pipelines, Corporate retail operations and
Wholesale Energy, partially offset by the unfavorable effects of warm weather on
the operations of Natural Gas Distribution. Operating income for 1997 included
approximately $18 million of merger-related costs that did not recur in 1998.
Improved results at Interstate Pipelines were due to continued cost control
initiatives and reduced benefits expenses, as well as the effects of a rate case
settlement and a dispute settlement which contributed to the increase in
operating income. In addition, margins at Wholesale Energy improved over margins
in 1997; however, this effect was partially offset by increased staffing
expenses to support increased sales and marketing efforts and an increase in
credit reserves. Improved results at Wholesale Energy were also due to the fact
that operating income in 1997 for Wholesale Energy was negatively impacted by
hedging losses associated with sales under peaking contracts and losses from the
sale of natural gas held in storage and unhedged in the first quarter of 1997
totaling $17 million.
1998 (Actual) Compared to 1997 (Pro Forma). Resources' consolidated net income
for 1998 was $94 million compared to pro forma net income of $66 million in
1997. The increase in earnings for 1998 as compared to pro forma 1997 was due
to increased operating income from several business segments, as discussed
below, offset by the effects of unfavorable weather at Resources' Natural Gas
Distribution unit. Also contributing to the increase in earnings is a
reduction in interest expense due to the refinancing of debt.
Resources operating revenues for 1998 were $6.8 billion compared to pro
forma operating revenues of $5.8 billion in 1997. The $919 million, or 16%
increase was primarily attributable to an $1.4 billion increase in wholesale
trading revenue. Wholesale trading revenue increased due to increased electric
and natural gas trading volumes. The increase in trading revenues was offset by
reduced revenues at Resources' Natural Gas Distribution unit of approximately
$400 million, principally due to warmer weather.
Resources operating expenses for 1998 were $6.4 billion compared to pro
forma operating expense of $5.6 billion in 1997. The $800 million, or 16%
increase was primarily due to increased natural gas and purchased power
expenses associated with increased wholesale trading activities. The increase
in operating expense was offset by decreased natural gas purchases at
Resources' Natural Gas Distribution unit because of lower volumes resulting
from warmer weather.
3
<PAGE> 16
Operating income increased in 1998 by $68 million over pro forma 1997 due
to improved operating results at Interstate Pipelines, Corporate retail
operations and Wholesale Energy, partially offset by the unfavorable effects of
Warm weather on the operations of Natural Gas Distribution. Improved results at
Interstate Pipelines are due to continued cost control initiatives and reduced
benefits expenses as well as the effects of a rate case settlement and a dispute
settlement. In addition, margins at Wholesale Energy improved over margins in
1997, however, this effect was partially offset by increased staffing expenses
to support increased sales and marketing efforts and an increase in credit
reserves at Wholesale Energy also contributed to the increase in operating
income. Operating income in 1997 for Wholesale Energy was negatively impacted by
hedging losses associated with sales under peaking contracts and losses from the
sale of natural gas held in storage and unhedged in the first quarter of 1997
totaling $17 million.
Resources estimates that its total direct cost of resolving the Year 2000
issues will be between $5 and $6 million. This estimate includes approximately
$3.4 million spent through year-end 1998. For additional information regarding
Year 2000 issues, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -- Certain Factors Affecting
Future Earnings of the Company and its Subsidiaries -- Impact of the Year 2000
Issue and Other System Implementation Issues" in Item 7 of the Form 10-K of
Reliant Energy, which has been jointly filed with the Resources Form 10-K.
NEW ACCOUNTING ISSUES
Reference is made to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -- New Accounting Issues" in
Item 7 of the Form 10-K of Reliant Energy, which has been jointly filed with
the Resources Form 10-K, for discussion of certain new accounting issues.
RESOURCES 10-K NOTES
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(c) Regulatory Assets and Regulation.
In general, Resources' Interstate Pipelines operations are subject to
regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, while its Natural Gas
Distribution operations are subject to regulation at the state or municipal
level. Historically, all of Resources' rate-regulated businesses have followed
the accounting guidance contained in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation" (SFAS No.
71). Resources discontinued application of SFAS No. 71 to REGT in 1992. As a
result of the continued application of SFAS No. 71 to MRT and the Natural Gas
Distribution operations, Resources' financial statements contain assets and
liabilities which would not be recognized by unregulated entities.
At December 31, 1998 Resources' Consolidated Balance Sheet included
approximately $12 million in regulatory assets recorded as deferred debits.
These assets represent probable future revenue to Resources associated with
certain incurred costs as these costs are recovered through the rate making
process. These costs are being recovered through rates over varying periods up
to 40 years.
(2) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) Price Risk Management and Trading Activities.
Resources, through its subsidiary, Reliant Energy Services, offers energy
price risk management services primarily in the natural gas, electric and crude
oil and refined product industries. Reliant Energy Services provides these
services by utilizing a variety of derivative financial instruments, including
fixed and variable-priced physical forward contracts, fixed-price swap
agreements, variable-price swap agreements, exchange-traded energy futures and
option contracts, and swaps and options traded in the over-the-counter financial
markets (Trading Derivatives). Fixed-price swap agreements require payments to,
or receipts of payments from, counterparties based on the differential between a
fixed and variable price for the commodity. Variable-price swap agreements
require payments to, or receipts of payments from, counterparties based on the
differential between industry pricing publications or exchange quotations.
Prior to 1998 Reliant Energy Services applied hedge accounting to certain
physical commodity activities that qualified for hedge accounting. In 1998,
Reliant Energy Services adopted mark-to-market accounting for all of its price
risk management and trading activities. Accordingly, as of such date, such
Trading Derivatives are recorded at fair value with realized and unrealized
gains (losses) recorded as a component of operating revenues in Resources'
Consolidated Statements of Income. The recognized, unrealized balance is
recorded as price risk management assets/liabilities and deferred debits/credits
on Resources' Consolidated Balance Sheets (See Note 1(r)).
The notional quantities, maximum terms and the estimated fair value of
Trading Derivatives at December 31, 1998 are presented below (volumes in
billions of British thermal units equivalent (BBtue) and dollars in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VOLUME-FIXED
VOLUME-FIXED PRICE MAXIMUM
1998 PRICE PAYOR RECEIVER TERM (YEARS)
---- ----------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.................................................. 937,264 977,293 9
Electricity.................................................. 122,950 124,878 3
Crude oil and products....................................... 205,499 204,223 3
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE> 17
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE FAIR
FAIR VALUE VALUE (a)
--------------------------- ---------------------------
1998 ASSETS LIABILITIES ASSETS LIABILITIES
---- ------ ----------- ------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.............................................. $ 224 $ 213 $ 124 $ 108
Electricity.............................................. 34 33 186 186
Crude oil and products................................... 29 23 21 17
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 287 $ 269 $ 331 $ 311
</TABLE>
The notional quantities, maximum terms and the estimated fair value of
derivative financial instruments at December 31, 1997 are presented below
(volumes in BBtue and dollars in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VOLUME-FIXED
VOLUME-FIXED PRICE MAXIMUM
1997 PRICE PAYOR RECEIVER TERM (YEARS)
----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.................................................. 85,701 64,890 4
Electricity.................................................. 40,511 42,976 1
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE FAIR
FAIR VALUE VALUE (A)
--------------------------- ---------------------------
1997 ASSETS LIABILITIES ASSETS LIABILITIES
---- ------ ----------- ------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.............................................. $ 46 $ 39 $ 56 $ 48
Electricity.............................................. 6 6 3 2
------- ------- ------- -------
$ 52 $ 45 $ 59 $ 50
</TABLE>
- ---------
(a) Computed using the ending balance of each month.
In addition to the fixed-price notional volumes above, Reliant Energy
Services also has variable-priced agreements, as discussed above, totaling
1,702,977 and 101,465 BBtue as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Notional amounts reflect the volume of transactions but do not represent the
amounts exchanged by the parties to the financial instruments. Accordingly,
notional amounts do not accurately measure Resources' exposure to market or
credit risks.
All of the fair values shown in the table above at December 31, 1998 and
substantially all at December 31, 1997 have been recognized in income. The fair
value as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 was estimated using quoted prices where
available and considering the liquidity of the market for the Trading
Derivatives. The prices are subject to significant changes based on changing
market conditions.
At December 31, 1998, $22 million of the fair value of the assets and $41
million of the fair value of the liabilities are recorded as long-term in
deferred debits and deferred credits, respectively, on Resources' Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
The weighted-average term of the trading portfolio, based on volumes, is
less than one year. The maximum and average terms disclosed herein are not
indicative of likely future cash flows, as these positions may be changed by
new transactions in the trading portfolio at any time in response to changing
market conditions, market liquidity and Resources' risk management portfolio
needs and strategies. Terms regarding cash settlements of these contracts vary
with respect to the actual timing of cash receipts and payments.
In addition to the risk associated with price movements, credit risk is
also inherent in Resources', and its subsidiaries' risk management activities.
Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from non-performance of
contractual obligations by a counterparty. The following table shows the
composition of the total price risk management assets of Reliant Energy
Services as of December 31, 1998.
5
<PAGE> 18
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INVESTMENT
GRADE (1) TOTAL
----------------- -----------------
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<S> <C> <C>
Energy marketers.......................................................... $ 102,458 $ 123,779
Financial institutions.................................................... 61,572 61,572
Gas and electric utilities................................................ 46,880 48,015
Oil and gas producers..................................................... 7,197 8,323
Industrials............................................................... 1,807 3,233
Independent power producers............................................... 1,452 1,463
Others.................................................................... 45,421 46,696
------------- -------------
Total................................................................ $ 266,787 293,081
=============
Credit and other reserves................................................. (6,464)
-------------
Energy price risk management assets(2).................................... $ 286,617
=============
</TABLE>
- ---------
(1) "Investment Grade" is primarily determined using publicly available credit
ratings along with the consideration of credit support (e.g., parent
company guarantees) and collateral, which encompass cash and standby
letters of credit.
(2) Resources has credit risk exposure with respect to two investment grade
customers, each of which represents an amount greater than 5% but less than
10% of Price Risk Management Assets.
(b) Non-Trading Activities.
To reduce the risk from market fluctuations in the price of electric
power, natural gas and related transportation, Resources and certain of its
subsidiaries enter into futures transactions, swaps and options (Energy
Derivatives) in order to hedge certain natural gas in storage, as well as
certain expected purchases, sales and transportation of natural gas and
electric power (a portion of which are firm commitments at the inception of the
hedge). Energy Derivatives are also utilized to fix the price of compressor
fuel or other future operational gas requirements, although usage to date for
this purpose has not been material. Resources applies hedge accounting with
respect to its derivative financial instruments.
Certain subsidiaries of Resources also utilize interest rate derivatives
(principally interest rate swaps) in order to adjust the portion of its overall
borrowings which are subject to interest rate risk and also utilize such
derivatives to effectively fix the interest rate on debt expected to be issued
for refunding purposes.
For transactions involving either Energy Derivatives or interest rate
derivatives, hedge accounting is applied only if the derivative (i) reduces the
price risk of the underlying hedged item and (ii) is designated as a hedge at
its inception. Additionally, the derivatives must be expected to result in
financial impacts which are inversely correlated to those of the item(s) to be
hedged. This correlation (a measure of hedge effectiveness) is measured both at
the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, with an acceptable level of
correlation of at least 80% for hedge designation. If and when correlation
ceases to exist at an acceptable level, hedge accounting ceases and
mark-to-market accounting is applied.
In the case of interest rate swaps associated with existing obligations,
cash flows and expenses associated with the interest rate derivative
transactions are matched with the cash flows and interest expense of the
obligation being hedged, resulting in an adjustment to the effective interest
rate. When interest rate swaps are utilized to effectively fix the interest
rate for an anticipated debt issuance, changes in the market value of the
interest rate derivatives are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the
effective interest rate on the newly issued debt.
Unrealized changes in the market value of Energy Derivatives utilized as
hedges are not generally recognized in Resources' Consolidated Statements of
Income until the underlying hedged transaction occurs. Once it becomes
6
<PAGE> 19
probable that an anticipated transaction will not occur, deferred gains and
losses are recognized. In general, the financial impact of transactions
involving these Energy Derivatives is included in Resources' Statements of
Consolidated Income under the captions (i) fuel expenses, in the case of
natural gas transactions and (ii) purchased power, in the case of electric
power transactions. Cash flows resulting from these transactions in Energy
Derivatives are included in Resources' Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows in
the same category as the item being hedged.
At December 31, 1998, subsidiaries of Resources were fixed-price payors
and fixed-price receivers in Energy Derivatives covering 42,498 billion British
thermal units (BBtu) and 3,930 BBtu of natural gas, respectively. At December
31, 1997, subsidiaries of Resources were fixed-price payors and fixed-price
receivers in Energy Derivatives covering 38,754 BBtu and 7,647 BBtu of natural
gas, respectively. Also, at December 31, 1998 and 1997, subsidiaries of
Resources were parties to variable-priced Energy Derivatives totaling 21,437
BBtu and 3,630 BBtu of natural gas, respectively. The weighted average maturity
of these instruments is less than one year.
The notional amount is intended to be indicative of Resources' and its
subsidiaries' level of activity in such derivatives, although the amounts at
risk are significantly smaller because, in view of the price movement
correlation required for hedge accounting, changes in the market value of these
derivatives generally are offset by changes in the value associated with the
underlying physical transactions or in other derivatives. When Energy
Derivatives are closed out in advance of the underlying commitment or
anticipated transaction, however, the market value changes may not offset due
to the fact that price movement correlation ceases to exist when the positions
are closed, as further discussed below. Under such circumstances, gains
(losses) are deferred and recognized as a component of income when the
underlying hedged item is recognized in income.
The average maturity discussed above and the fair value discussed in Note
10 are not necessarily indicative of likely future cash flows as these
positions may be changed by new transactions in the trading portfolio at any
time in response to changing market conditions, market liquidity and Resources'
risk management portfolio needs and strategies. Terms regarding cash
settlements of these contracts vary with respect to the actual timing of cash
receipts and payments.
(c) Trading and Non-trading -- General Policy.
In addition to the risk associated with price movements, credit risk is
also inherent in Resources' and its subsidiaries' risk management activities.
Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from non-performance of
contractual obligations by a counterparty. While as yet Resources and its
subsidiaries have experienced only minor losses due to the credit risk
associated with these arrangements, Resources has off-balance sheet risk to the
extent that the counterparties to these transactions may fail to perform as
required by the terms of each such contract. In order to minimize this risk,
Resources and/or its subsidiaries, as the case may be, enter into such
contracts primarily with those counterparties with a minimum Standard & Poor's
or Moody's rating of BBB- or Baa3, respectively. For long-term arrangements,
Resources and its subsidiaries periodically review the financial condition of
such firms in addition to monitoring the effectiveness of these financial
contracts in achieving Resources' objectives. Should the counterparties to
these arrangements fail to perform, Resources would seek to compel performance
at law or otherwise or obtain compensatory damages in lieu thereof. Resources
might be forced to acquire alternative hedging arrangements or be required to
honor the underlying commitment at then-current market prices. In such event,
Resources might incur additional loss to the extent of amounts, if any, already
paid to the counterparties. In view of its criteria for selecting
counterparties, its process for monitoring the financial strength of these
counterparties and its experience to date in successfully completing these
transactions, Resources believes that the risk of incurring a significant
financial statement loss due to the non-performance of counterparties to these
transactions is minimal.
Resources' policies prohibit the use of leveraged financial instruments.
(4) LONG-TERM AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING
(a) Short-term Financing.
In 1998, Resources met its short-term financing needs primarily through a
bank facility, bank lines of credit, a receivables facility and the issuance of
commercial paper. In March 1998, Resources replaced its $400 million revolving
credit facility with a five-year $350 million revolving credit facility
(Resources Credit Facility). Borrowings under the Resources Credit Facility are
unsecured and bear interest at a rate based upon either the London interbank
offered rate (LIBOR) plus a margin, a base rate or a rate determined through a
bidding process. The Resources Credit Facility is used to support Resources'
issuance of up to $350 million of commercial paper. There were no commercial
paper borrowings and no loans outstanding under the Resources Credit Facility
at December 31, 1998. Borrowings under Resources' prior credit facility at
December 31, 1997 were $340 million. In addition, Resources had $50 million of
outstanding loans under uncommitted lines of credit at December 31, 1997 having
a weighted average interest rate of 6.82%.
7
<PAGE> 20
A $65 million committed bank facility under which Resources obtained
letters of credit and all of Resources' uncommitted lines of credit were
terminated in 1998. Subsequent to the December 1998 termination, Resources
obtained letters of credit under an uncommitted line. Resources expects to amend
the Resources Credit Facility in March 1999 to add a $65 million letter of
credit subfacility.
Under a trade receivables facility (Receivables Facility) which expires in
August 1999, Resources sells, with limited recourse, an undivided interest
(limited to a maximum of $300 million) in a designated pool of accounts
receivable. The amount of receivables sold and uncollected was $300 million at
December 31, 1998 and at December 31, 1997. The weighted average interest rate
was approximately 5.54% at December 31, 1998 and 5.65% at December 31, 1997.
Certain of Resources' remaining receivables serve as collateral for receivables
sold and represent the maximum exposure to Resources should all receivables sold
prove ultimately uncollectible. Resources has retained servicing responsibility
under the Receivables Facility for which it is paid a servicing fee. Pursuant to
SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishment of Liabilities", Resources accounts for amounts transferred
pursuant to the Receivables Facility as collateralized borrowings. As a result,
these receivables are recorded as assets on Resources' Consolidated Balance
Sheet and amounts received by Resources pursuant to this facility are recorded
as a current liability under the caption "Receivables Facility."
(b) Long-term Debt.
Resources' consolidated long-term debt outstanding, which is summarized in
the following table, is noncallable and without sinking fund requirements
except as noted. Carrying amounts and amounts due in one year reflect $33.2
million and $3.4 million, respectively, for fair value adjustments recorded in
connection with the Merger.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1998
--------------------------------------------------------
CARRYING AMOUNTS
----------------------------
EFFECTIVE PRINCIPAL NON-CURRENT CURRENT
RATE AMOUNT PORTION PORTION
---- ------ ------- -------
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Medium-term notes, Series A and B due through
2001, weighted average rate of 8.96% at
December 31, 1998................................... 6.4% $ 165.6 $ 177.6
8.875% Series due 1999................................. 6.3% 200.0 $ 202.7
7.5% Series due 2000................................... 6.4% 200.0 203.1
8.9% Series due 2006................................... 6.8% 145.1 163.4
6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2012........ 6.5% 109.6 104.6
10% Series due 2019(1)................................. 8.8% 42.8 47.6
6 1/2% Series due 2008................................. 6.5% 300.0 300.0
6 %% Series due 2003................................... 6.4% 517.0 517.0
Other.................................................. 0.7
---------- ---------- ----------
$ 1,680.1 $ 1,513.3 $ 203.4
========== ========== ==========
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1997
--------------------------------------------------------
CARRYING AMOUNTS
----------------------------
EFFECTIVE PRINCIPAL NON-CURRENT CURRENT
RATE AMOUNT PORTION PORTION
---- ------ ------- -------
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Medium-term notes, Series A and B due through
2001, weighted average rate of 8.90% at
December 31, 1997............................ 6.4% $ 241.6 $ 183.8 $ 78.8
Bank Term Loan due 1998................................ 6.2% 150.0 153.3
8.875% Series due 1999................................. 6.3% 200.0 207.2
7.5% Series due 2000................................... 6.4% 200.0 205.0
8.9% Series due 2006................................... 6.8% 145.1 165.1
6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2012........ 6.5% 116.3 107.2
10% Series due 2019(1)................................. 8.8% 42.8 47.8
Other.................................................. 4.1% 0.6 0.6
---------- ---------- -----------
$ 1,096.4 $ 916.7 $ 232.1
========== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) In the fourth quarter of 1997 Resources purchased $101.4 million aggregate
principal amount of its 10% Debentures due 2019 at an average price of
111.98% plus accrued interest. Because Resources' debt was stated at fair
market value as of the Acquisition Date, the loss on the reacquisition of
these debentures was not material.
8
<PAGE> 21
Consolidated maturities of long-term debt and sinking fund requirements
for Resources are approximately $207 million for 1999, $228 million in 2000,
$151 million in 2001, $7 million in 2002 and $7 million in 2003.
Resources' retirements and reacquisitions of long-term debt are summarized
in the following table. In cases where premiums were paid or discounts were
realized in association with these reacquisitions and retirements, such amounts
are reported in Resources' Statements of Consolidated Income as "Extraordinary
gain (loss) on early retirement of debt, less taxes" and are net of taxes of
$0.1 million and ($2.5) million in 1997 and 1996, respectively. For retirements
and reacquisitions after the Acquisition Date, gains or losses on early
retirement are immaterial since the carrying amounts reflect the fair value
adjustments described above.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1998(1) 1997(1)
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Reacquisition of 10% Debentures due 2019................................. $ 101.4
Reacquisition of 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2012(2)...... $ 6.7 5.8
Retirement, at maturity, of Medium Term Notes(3)......................... 76.0 52.0
Retirement of Bank Term Loan due 2000.................................... 150.0
Retirement of 9.875% Notes due 1997...................................... 225.0
Net (gain) loss on reacquisition of debt, less taxes..................... (0.2)
-------------- --------------
$ 232.7 $ 384.0
============== ==============
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Excludes the conversion of 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2012
in the amount of approximately $0 and $.7 million at December 31, 1998 and
December 31, 1997, respectively.
(2) These reacquired debentures may be credited against sinking fund
requirements.
(3) Weighted average interest rate of 8.75% and 9.25% in 1998 and 1997,
respectively.
In June 1996, Resources exercised its right to exchange the $130 million
principal amount of its $3.00 Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series
A for its 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2012 (Subordinated
Debentures). The holders of the Subordinated Debentures receive interest
quarterly and have the right at any time on or before the maturity date thereof
to convert each Subordinated Debenture into 0.65 shares of common stock of
Reliant Energy and $14.24 in cash. The Subordinated Debentures are callable
beginning in 1999 at redemption prices beginning at 105.0% and declining to par
in November 2009. Resources is required to make annual sinking fund payments of
$6.5 million on the Subordinated Debentures which began on March 15, 1997 and
will continue on each succeeding March 15 up to and including March 15, 2011.
Resources (i) may credit against the sinking fund requirements any Subordinated
Debentures redeemed by Resources and Subordinated Debentures which have been
converted at the option of the holder and (ii) may deliver purchased
Subordinated Debentures in satisfaction of the sinking fund requirements.
Resources satisfied its 1998 sinking fund requirement of $6.5 million by
delivering Subordinated Debentures purchased in 1996 and 1997.
In February 1998, Resources issued $300 million principal amount of 6.5%
debentures due February 1, 2008. The proceeds from the sale of the debentures
were used to repay short-term indebtedness of Resources, including the
indebtedness incurred in connection with the 1997 purchase of $101 million
aggregate principal amount of its 10% debentures and the repayment of $53
million aggregate principal amount of Resources debt that matured in December
1997 and January 1998. In connection with the issuance of the 6.5% debentures,
Resources received approximately $1 million upon unwinding a $300 million
treasury rate lock agreement, which was tied to the interest rate on 10-year
treasury bonds. The rate lock agreement was executed in January 1998, and
proceeds from the unwind will be amortized over the 10 year life of Resources'
6.5% debentures.
In November 1998, Resources sold $500 million aggregate principal amount
of its 6 3/8% Term Enhanced ReMarketable Securities (TERM Notes). Included
within the TERM Notes is an embedded option sold to an investment bank which
gives the investment bank the right to remarket the TERM Notes in 2003 if it
chooses to exercise the option. The net proceeds of $514 million from the
offering of the TERM Notes were used for general corporate purposes, including
the repayment of (i) $178.5 million of Resources' outstanding commercial paper
and (ii) a $150 million term loan of Resources that matured on November 13,
1998. The TERM Notes are unsecured obligations of Resources which bear interest
at an annual rate of 6 3/8% through November 1, 2003. On November 1, 2003, the
holders of the TERM Notes are required to tender their notes at 100% of their
principal amount. The portion of the proceeds attributable to the option
premium will be amortized over the stated term of the securities. If the option
is not exercised, Resources will repurchase the TERM Notes at 100% of their
principal amount on November 1, 2003. If the option is exercised, the TERM
Notes will be remarketed on a date, selected by Resources, within the 52-week
period beginning November 1, 2003. During such period and prior to remarketing,
the TERM Notes will bear interest at rates, adjusted weekly, based on an index
selected by Resources. If the TERM Notes are
9
<PAGE> 22
remarketed, the final maturity date of the TERM Notes will be November 1, 2013,
subject to adjustment, and the effective interest rate on the remarketed TERM
Notes will be 5.66% plus Resources' applicable credit spread at the time of
such remarketing.
(b) Restrictions on Debt.
Under the provisions of the Resources Credit Facility, Resources' total
debt is limited to 55% of its total capitalization. This provision did not
significantly restrict Resources' ability to issue debt or to pay dividends in
1998. At December 31, 1998, Resources' total debt to total capitalization
equaled 40%.
(5) TRUST SECURITIES
In June 1996, a Delaware statutory business trust (Resources Trust)
established by Resources issued in a public offering $172.5 million of
convertible preferred securities and sold approximately $5.3 million of
Resources Trust common stock (106,720 shares, representing 100% of the
Resources Trust's common equity) to Resources. The convertible preferred
securities have a distribution rate of 6.25% payable quarterly in arrears, a
stated liquidation amount of $50 per convertible preferred security and must be
redeemed by 2026. The proceeds from the sale of the preferred and common
securities were used by Resources Trust to purchase $177.8 million of 6.25%
Convertible Junior Subordinated Debentures from Resources having an interest
rate corresponding to the distribution rate of the convertible preferred
securities and a maturity date corresponding to the mandatory redemption date
of the convertible preferred securities. Under existing law, interest payments
made by Resources for the junior subordinated debentures are deductible for
federal income tax purposes. Resources has the right at any time and from time
to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debentures for
successive periods not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters for each such
extension period. In such case, (1) quarterly distributions on the junior
subordinated debentures would also be deferred and (2) Resources has agreed to
not declare or pay any dividend on any common or preferred stock, except in
certain instances.
The Resources Trust is accounted for as a wholly owned consolidated
subsidiary of Resources. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole assets
of the Resources Trust. Resources has fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on
a subordinated basis, the Resources Trust's obligations, including the payment
of distributions and all other payments, with respect to the convertible
preferred securities. The convertible preferred securities are mandatorily
redeemable upon the repayment of the related junior subordinated debentures at
their stated maturity or earlier redemption. Each convertible preferred security
is convertible at the option of the holder into $33.62 of cash and 1.55 shares
of Reliant Energy common stock. During 1998, convertible preferred securities
aggregating $15.5 million were converted, leaving $0.9 million liquidation
amount of convertible preferred securities outstanding at December 31, 1998.
(8) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Lease Commitments.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning Resources'
obligations under operating leases:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Minimum Lease Commitments at December 31, 1998(1)
(millions of dollars)
<S> <C>
1999........................................................................ $ 19
2000........................................................................ 15
2001........................................................................ 14
2002........................................................................ 10
2003........................................................................ 9
2004 and beyond............................................................. 61
----------
Total......................................................................... $ 128
==========
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Principally consisting of rental agreements for building space and data
processing equipment and vehicles (including major work equipment);
approximately $16 million represents rental agreements with Reliant
Energy.
10
<PAGE> 23
Resources has a master leasing agreement which provides for the lease of
vehicles, construction equipment, office furniture, data processing equipment
and other property. For accounting purposes, the lease is treated as an
operating lease. At December 31, 1998, the unamortized value of equipment
covered by the master leasing agreement was $26.9 million. Resources does not
expect to lease additional property under this lease agreement.
Total rental expense for all leases was $25.0 million, $24.0 million and
$33.4 million in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
(b) Letters of Credit.
At December 31, 1998, Resources had letters of credit incidental to its
ordinary business operations totaling approximately $30 million under which
Resources is obligated to reimburse drawings, if any.
(c) Indemnity Provisions.
At December 31, 1998, Resources had a $5.8 million accounting reserve on
its Consolidated Balance Sheets in "Estimated obligations under indemnification
provisions of sale agreements" for possible indemnity claims asserted in
connection with its disposition of former subsidiaries or divisions, including
the sale of (i) Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corporation, a former subsidiary
engaged in the intrastate pipeline and liquids extraction business (1992); (ii)
Arkla Exploration Company, a former subsidiary engaged in oil and gas
exploration and production activities (June 1991); and (iii) Dyco Petroleum
Company, a former subsidiary engaged in oil and gas exploration and production
(1991).
(d) Sale of Receivables.
Certain of Resources' receivables are collateral for receivables which
have been sold pursuant to the terms of the Receivables Facility. For
information regarding these receivables, see Note 4(a).
(e) Gas Purchase Claims.
In conjunction with settlements of "take-or-pay" claims, Resources has
prepaid for certain volumes of gas, which prepayments have been recorded at
their net realizable value and, to the extent that Resources is unable to
realize at least the carrying amount as the gas is delivered and sold,
Resources' earnings will be reduced, although such reduction is not expected to
be material. In addition to these prepayments, Resources is a party to a number
of agreements which require it to either purchase or sell gas in the future at
prices which may differ from then prevailing market prices or which require it
to deliver gas at a point other than the expected receipt point for volumes to
be purchased. To the extent that Resources expects that these commitments will
result in losses over the contract term, Resources has established reserves
equal to such expected losses. As of December 31, 1998, these reserves were not
material.
(f) Transportation Agreement.
Resources had an agreement (ANR Agreement) with ANR Pipeline Company (ANR)
which contemplated that Resources would transfer to ANR an interest in certain
of Resources' pipeline and related assets. The interest represented capacity of
250 Mmcf/day. Under the ANR Agreement, an ANR affiliate advanced $125 million
to Resources. Subsequently, the parties restructured the ANR Agreement and
Resources refunded in 1995 and 1993, respectively, $50 million and $34 million
to ANR or an affiliate. Resources recorded $41 million as a liability
reflecting ANR's or its affiliates' use of 130 Mmcf/ day of capacity in certain
of Resources' transportation facilities. The level of transportation will
decline to 100 Mmcf/day in the year 2003 with a refund of $5 million to an ANR
affiliate. The ANR Agreement will terminate in 2005 with a refund of the
remaining balance.
(g) Environmental Matters.
To the extent that potential environmental remediation costs are
quantified within a range, Resources establishes reserves equal to the most
likely level of costs within the range and adjusts such accruals as better
information becomes available. In determining the amount of the liability,
future costs are not discounted to their present value and the liability is not
offset by expected insurance recoveries. If justified by circumstances within
Resources' business subject to SFAS No. 71, corresponding regulatory assets are
recorded in anticipation of recovery through the rate making process.
Manufactured Gas Plant Sites. Resources and its predecessors operated a
manufactured gas plant (MGP) adjacent to the Mississippi River in Minnesota
formerly known as Minneapolis Gas Works (FMGW) until 1960. Resources has
substantially completed remediation of the main site other than ongoing water
monitoring and treatment. There are six other former MGP sites in the Minnesota
service territory. Remediation has been completed on one site. Of the remaining
five sites, Resources believes that two were neither owned nor operated by
Resources; two were owned by Resources at one time but were operated by others
and are currently owned by others; and one site was previously owned and
operated by Resources but is currently owned by others. Resources believes it
has no liability with respect to the sites it neither owned nor operated.
At December 31, 1998, Resources had estimated a range of $12 million to
$70 million for possible remediation of the Minnesota sites. The low end of the
range was determined based on only those sites presently owned or known to have
been operated by Resources, assuming use of Resources' proposed remediation
methods. The upper end of the range was determined based on the sites once
owned by Resources, whether or not operated by Resources. The cost estimates of
the FMGW site are based on studies of that site. The remediation costs for the
other sites are based on industry average costs for remediation of sites of
similar size. The actual remediation costs will be dependent upon the number of
sites remediated, the participation of other potentially responsible parties,
if any, and the remediation methods used.
11
<PAGE> 24
At December 31, 1998 and 1997, Resources had recorded accruals of $5.4
million and $3.3 million, respectively (with a maximum estimated exposure of
approximately $8 million and $18 million at December 31, 1998 and 1997,
respectively) and an offsetting regulatory asset for environmental matters in
connection with a former fire training facility, a landfill and an underground
gas storage facility for which future remediation may be required. This accrual
is in addition to the accrual for MGP sites as previously discussed.
In its 1995 rate case, Reliant Energy Minnegasco was allowed to recover
approximately $7 million annually for remediation costs. In 1998, Reliant
Energy Minnegasco received approval to reduce its annual recovery rate to zero.
Remediation costs are subject to a true-up mechanism whereby any over or under
recovered amounts, net of certain insurance recoveries, plus carrying charges,
would be deferred for recovery or refund in the next rate case. At December 31,
1998 and 1997, Reliant Energy Minnegasco had over recovered $13 million and
$1.8 million, respectively. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, Minnegasco had
recorded a liability of $20.7 million and $21.7 million, respectively, to cover
the cost of future remediation. In addition, at December 31, 1998, Minnegasco
had receivables from insurance settlements of $.6 million. These insurance
settlements will be collected in 1999. Minnegasco expects that approximately
43% of its accrual as of December 31, 1998 will be expended within the next
five years. The remainder will be expended on an ongoing basis for an estimated
40 years. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 71, a regulatory asset
has been recorded equal to the liability accrued. Minnegasco is continuing to
pursue recovery of at least a portion of these costs from insurers. Minnegasco
believes the difference between any cash expenditures for these costs and the
amount recovered in rates during any year will not be material to Resources'
overall cash requirements, results of operations or cash flows.
Issues relating to the identification and remediation of MGPs are common
in the natural gas distribution industry. Resources has received notices from
the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and others regarding
its status as a potentially responsible party (PRP) for other sites. Based on
current information, Resources has not been able to quantify a range of
environmental expenditures for potential remediation expenditures with respect
to other MGP sites.
Mercury Contamination. Like other natural gas pipelines, Resources'
pipeline operations have in the past employed elemental mercury in meters used
on its pipelines. Although the mercury has now been removed from the meters, it
is possible that small amounts of mercury have been spilled at some of those
sites in the course of normal maintenance and replacement operations and that
such spills have contaminated the immediate area around the meters with
elemental mercury. Such contamination has been found by Resources at some sites
in the past, and Resources has conducted remediation at sites found to be
contaminated. Although Resources is not aware of additional specific sites, it
is possible that other contaminated sites exist and that remediation costs will
be incurred for such sites. Although the total amount of such costs cannot be
known at this time, based on experience by Resources and others in the natural
gas industry to date and on the current regulations regarding remediation of
such sites, Resources believes that the cost of any remediation of such sites
will not be material to Resources' financial position, results of operation or
cash flows.
Potentially Responsible Party Notifications. From time to time Resources
and its subsidiaries have been notified that they are PRP's with respect to
properties which environmental authorities have determined warrant remediation
under state or federal environmental laws and regulations. In October 1994 the
EPA issued such a notice with respect to the South 8th Street landfill site in
West Memphis, Arkansas, and in December 1995, the Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality advised that one of Resources' subsidiaries had been
identified as a PRP with respect to a hazardous waste site in Shreveport,
Louisiana.
In 1998, MRT received a notice of potential liability from the EPA
regarding MRT's PRP status with respect to the Gurley Pit Superfund Site. The
notice stated that MRT is a PRP for the response costs at this site because MRT
allegedly generated materials that were disposed of at the site. MRT
subsequently notified the EPA that it does not believe that it has liability
because it did not have operations in the state from which the material was
allegedly hauled. In December 1998, MRT learned that the South 8th Street
Superfund Site Group and the EPA reached a tentative settlement regarding the
South 8th Street and Gurley Pit Superfund Sites.
Considering the information currently known about such sites and the
involvement of Resources or its subsidiaries in activities at these sites,
Resources does not believe that these matters will have a material adverse
effect on Resources' financial position, results of operation or cash flows.
Resources is a party to litigation (other than that specifically noted)
which arises in the normal course of business. Management regularly analyzes
current information and, as necessary, provides accruals for probable
liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. Management believes
that the effect on Resources' Consolidated Financial Statements, if any, from
the disposition of these matters will not be material.
12
<PAGE> 25
RESOURCES FIRST QUARTER 10-Q NOTES
(9) LONG-TERM DEBT AND SHORT-TERM FINANCING
(b) Resources.
As of March 31, 1999, Resources had outstanding $2.0 billion of
long-term and short-term debt. Consolidated maturities of long-term debt and
sinking fund requirements for Resources are approximately $200 million for the
remainder of 1999.
In the first quarter of 1999, Resources purchased $6.04 million of its
6% convertible subordinated debentures due 2012 at an average purchase price of
98.3% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest. Resources plans
to use the purchased debentures to satisfy March 2000 and 2001 sinking fund
requirements of the 6% convertible subordinated debentures. For more information
regarding Resources' financing arrangements, lease commitments and letters of
credit, see Notes 4 and 8 (a) and (b) of the Resources 10-K Notes.
For information regarding Resources' $300 million receivables facility,
see Note 4(a) of the Resources 10-K Notes. At March 31, 1999, Resources had sold
$300 million of receivables under the facility. The weighted average interest
rate was 4.88%.
For information regarding Resources' $350 million revolving credit
facility, see Note 4(a) of the Resources 10-K Notes. In March 1999, this
facility was amended to include a $65 million sub-facility under which letters
of credit may be obtained. At March 31, 1999, there were no commercial paper
borrowings or loans outstanding under the facility and letters of credit issued
under the facility aggregated $14.6 million.
13
