<PAGE>
===============================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
[_] Confidential, for Use of Commission Only (as permitted by rule 14a-6(e)(2))
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 12a-6(i)(2)
[_] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0.11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(j)(2) or
Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[_] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
<PAGE>
[RELIANT ENERGY LOGO]
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 3, 2000
AND PROXY STATEMENT
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
-----
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
<S> <C>
Proxy Statement...................................................................................... 1
Voting Information................................................................................. 1
Information About Directors........................................................................ 1
Stock Ownership.................................................................................... 8
Executive Compensation Tables...................................................................... 9
Retirement Plans, Related Benefits and Other Arrangements.......................................... 11
Report of the Compensation Committee............................................................... 14
Stock Performance Graph............................................................................ 17
Proposal Regarding Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.............................................. 17
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Accountants and Auditors................................ 19
Shareholder Proposals for 2001 Annual Meeting...................................................... 19
Director Nominations for 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders....................................... 19
General Information................................................................................ 20
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance............................................ 20
Annual Report to Shareholders...................................................................... 20
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
[RELIANT ENERGY LOGO]
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Reliant Energy, Incorporated 2000
annual meeting of shareholders. The meeting will be held in the AUDITORIUM OF
RELIANT ENERGY PLAZA, 1111 LOUISIANA, HOUSTON, TEXAS, at 9:00 a.m. Central time,
on Wednesday, May 3, 2000. At the meeting, shareholders will be asked to:
. elect four Class I Directors for three-year terms;
. elect one Class III Director for a two-year term;
. to adopt the Reliant Energy, Incorporated Annual Incentive Compensation
Plan, including provisions relating to performance-based compensation
necessary to satisfy requirements under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code;
. ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent
accountants and auditors for the Company for 2000; and
. conduct other business if properly raised.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2000 are
entitled to vote. Each share entitles the holder to one vote. You may vote by
either attending the meeting or by proxy card. For specific voting information,
please see "Voting Information" on page 1. EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE
MEETING, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
Sincerely,
/s/ Hugh Rice Kelley
---------------------------------
Hugh Rice Kelly
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
Dated and first mailed
to Shareholders
on March 29, 2000
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
1111 LOUISIANA
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
(713) 207-3000
PROXY STATEMENT
VOTING INFORMATION
Who may vote. Shareholders recorded in our stock register on March 6, 2000,
may vote at the meeting. As of such date, there were 293,041,107 shares of
common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock has one vote.
Voting by proxy or in person. Your vote is important. You may vote in person
at the meeting or by proxy. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to
attend the meeting. You may always change your vote at the meeting. Giving us
your proxy means that you authorize us to vote your shares at the meeting in the
manner you indicated on your proxy card. You may vote for all, some, or none of
our director candidates. You may also vote for or against the other proposals or
abstain from voting.
If you sign and return the enclosed proxy card but do not specify how to
vote, we will vote your shares in favor of the director candidates, in favor of
the proposal regarding the Company's Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, and in
favor of the ratification of independent accountants.
Your proxy may be revoked before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with
a later date, by voting in person at the meeting, or by giving written notice to
Mr. Robert E. Smith, Assistant Corporate Secretary, at the Company's address
shown above.
If you plan to attend the meeting and your shares are held by banks,
brokers or investment plans (in "street name"), you will need proof of ownership
to be admitted to the meeting. A recent brokerage statement or letter from your
broker or bank are examples of proof of ownership.
Quorum needed. In order to carry on the business of the meeting, we must
have a quorum. This means at least a majority of the outstanding shares eligible
to vote must be represented at the meeting, either by proxy or in person. Shares
owned by the Company are not voted and do not count for this purpose.
Votes needed. The director candidates in each of Classes I and III
receiving the most votes will be elected to fill the open seats in the
respective classes on the Board. Approval of the adoption of the Reliant Energy,
Incorporated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and ratification of the
appointment of independent accountants require the favorable vote of a majority
of the shares of common stock voted for or against the matter. Abstentions and
broker non-votes count for quorum proposes. For voting purposes, abstentions and
broker non-votes do not affect the determination of whether the plan is approved
or the appointment of independent accountants is ratified. Broker non-votes
occur when a broker returns a proxy but does not have authority to vote on a
particular proposal.
INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS
The Company's Board of Directors is divided into three classes having
staggered terms of three years. The term of office of the directors in Class I
expires at this year's meeting. The terms of office of the Class II and Class
III directors will expire in 2001 and 2002, respectively. At each annual
meeting, directors are elected to succeed the Class of directors whose terms
have expired.
<PAGE>
The Board's nominees for Class I director are Laree E. Perez and current
Class I directors Robert J. Cruikshank, Linnet F. Deily, and T. Milton Honea.
Current Class I director Dr. Alexander F. Schilt is not standing for reelection.
In order to more evenly allocate the numbers of directors in the several
classes, Lee W. Hogan, currently a Class I director, is presented for reelection
as a Class III director.
If any nominee becomes unavailable for election, the Board of Directors can
name a substitute nominee and proxies will be voted for such substitute nominee
pursuant to discretionary authority.
Information about each of the nominees and the continuing directors is set
forth below.
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR
Nominees for Class I Director--Term Expiring 2003
ROBERT J. CRUIKSHANK, age 69, has been a director since 1993. Mr.
Cruikshank is primarily engaged in managing his personal investments in Houston,
Texas. Prior to his retirement in 1993, he was a Senior Partner in the
accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche. Mr. Cruikshank serves as a director of
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation, MAXXAM Inc., Texas Biotechnology Corporation and
Weingarten Realty Investors, and as an advisory director of Compass Bank.
LINNET F. DEILY, age 54, has been a director since 1993. Ms. Deily is Vice
Chairman of the Charles Schwab Corporation, in San Francisco, California and
President of the Schwab Retail Group, and is a member of the firm's planning and
management committees. She previously served as Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President of First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A. until April 1996,
having been Chairman since 1992, Chief Executive Officer since 1991 and
President since 1988.
T. MILTON HONEA, age 67, has been a director since 1997. Mr. Honea was
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of NorAm Energy
Corp. (NorAm) until its acquisition by the Company in 1997, having served in
that capacity since December 1992. He was Vice Chairman of the Board of NorAm
from July 1992 through December 1992. He was Executive Vice President of NorAm
from October 1991 until July 1992 and President and Chief Operating Officer of
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company, a division of NorAm, from October 1984 to
October 1991.
LAREE E. PEREZ, age 46, has not previously served as a director. Ms. Perez
is Vice President of Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P., in Albuquerque, New Mexico,
an investment management firm. Prior to 1996, Ms. Perez was co-founder,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Medallion Investment Management
Company, Inc. until it was acquired by Loomis Sayles.
Nominee for Class III Director - Term Expiring 2002
LEE W. HOGAN, age 55, has been a director since 1995. Mr. Hogan is a Vice
Chairman of the Company and has served in that capacity since June 1999. He has
served since 1990 in various positions as an executive officer of the Company
and its corporate predecessors and subsidiaries.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
Continuing Class II Directors--Term Expiring 2001
MILTON CARROLL, age 49, has been a director since 1992. Mr. Carroll is
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Instrument Products, Inc., an
oil-tool manufacturing company in Houston, Texas. He is a director of Health
Care Service Corporation, Ocean Energy, Inc. and TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
2
<PAGE>
JOHN T. CATER, age 64, has been a director since 1983. Mr. Cater is
Chairman of Compass Bank--Houston, Texas. He previously served as President of
Compass Bank--Houston, Texas, as Chairman and a director of River Oaks Trust
Company, and as President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of MCorp, a
Texas bank holding company.
R. STEVE LETBETTER, age 51, has been a director since 1995. Mr. Letbetter
is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, having been
Chairman since January 2000, President since June 1997, and Chief Executive
Officer since June 1999. He has served since 1978 in various positions as an
executive officer of the Company and its corporate predecessors. Mr. Letbetter
is a director of Chase Bank of Texas--Houston.
Continuing Class III Directors--Term Expiring 2002
JAMES A. BAKER, III, age 69, has been a director since 1996. Mr. Baker is
currently a senior partner in the law firm of Baker Botts L.L.P. in Houston,
Texas, Senior Counselor to The Carlyle Group, a merchant banking firm in
Washington, D. C., and a director of Electronic Data Systems Corporation. He
served as the U.S. Secretary of State from January 1989 through August 1992 and
as White House Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor to President Bush from August
1992 to January 1993. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Baker was the U.S. Secretary of the
Treasury and Chairman of the President's Economic Policy Council in the
administration of President Reagan, having previously served as President
Reagan's White House Chief of Staff from 1981 to 1985 and as President Ford's
Under Secretary of Commerce in 1975.
RICHARD E. BALZHISER, Ph.D., age 67, has been a director since 1996. Dr.
Balzhiser is President Emeritus of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
in Palo Alto, California, a collaborative research and development organization
funded by member electric utilities. Dr. Balzhiser joined EPRI in 1973 as
Director of the Fossil Fuel Advanced Systems Division. He became Vice President
of Research and Development in 1979 and Executive Vice President in 1987, and
served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1988 through August 1996.
He is a director of Electrosource Inc.
O. HOLCOMBE CROSSWELL, age 59, has been a director since 1997. Mr.
Crosswell is President of Griggs Corporation, a real estate and investment
company in Houston, Texas.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors periodically reviews trends in corporate governance to
ensure that it is providing effective governance over the affairs of the
Company. In 1999, the Board established the Governance Committee and directed
it to review best practices in corporate governance and to recommend to the
Board a set of corporate governance guidelines. The Governance Committee
reviewed the practices of a peer group of utility companies and a peer group of
similarly sized companies. As a result of this review, the Board of Directors
adopted the following set of corporate governance guidelines in November 1999.
The Governance Committee and the Board will continue to assess the
appropriateness and efficacy of the guidelines, and it is likely that changes to
the guidelines will be considered from time to time.
Reliant Energy, Incorporated Corporate Governance Guidelines
Role of Board
The Board of Directors is the ultimate decision-making body of Reliant Energy,
Incorporated except with respect to those matters reserved to the shareholders.
It elects the executive management team, which is charged with the conduct of
the Company's business. Having elected the executive management team, the Board
acts as an advisor and counselor to executive management and ultimately monitors
its performance.
The principal duty of the Board of Directors and management of the Company is
to assure that the Company is well managed in the interests of its shareholders.
3
<PAGE>
Board Structure
Number of Directors. The Board will normally consist of between nine and
eighteen directors, subject to the provisions of the Company's charter and
bylaws. The number of directors will be determined from time to time by the
Board, based upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, in
consultation with the CEO. The Board currently has eleven directors.
The Board, in its discretion, may appoint from time to time a limited
number of advisory directors. The advisory directors will attend Board meetings
but will not vote and will not be considered to be directors in the restrictions
set forth above in this item and in the next item.
Board Composition. A significant majority of the directors will be outside
directors. Outside directors are individuals who:
. are not past or present members of management;
. do not have a close family relationship with a member of management; and
. do not have any relationship with the Company that, in the opinion of
the Board, would adversely affect their ability to exercise independent
judgment as directors.
In addition, no less than two nor more than four voting directors will be
officers of the Company.
Selection of Directors. The Governance Committee, in consultation with the
CEO, will evaluate and recommend to the Board potential nominees for election to
the Board of Directors. All nominees shall meet the qualification and
eligibility requirements contained in the Company's bylaws. The CEO, upon
approval of the Board, will extend the offer to the candidate.
In nominating a slate of directors to shareholders, the Board's objective
is to select eligible individuals whose qualifications are such that they will
contribute to the formulation and implementation of the Company's strategic
direction. The Board will consider the need for a range among the directors of
business experience, diversity, professional skills, geographic background and
other qualities in light of the Company's business plan.
Board Leadership. The Chairman of the Board and the CEO shall be the same
person, except that it may be advisable during a CEO transition to have the
positions separated for a brief period.
Committees of the Board. The Governance Committee, based upon
recommendations of the CEO, will make the following recommendations to the
Board:
. membership of each committee, including chairs;
. responsibilities of each committee; and
. whether new committees should be formed and whether existing committees
should be continued, redirected or abolished.
The Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees will consist solely of
outside directors. The CEO will be an ex officio non-voting member of the
Governance Committee. In the case of the Audit Committee and the Compensation
Committee, counsel will be consulted to confirm that each member satisfies any
eligibility requirements under applicable securities law, stock exchange,
federal income tax and other legal requirements. Each committee chair, in
consultation with committee members, will determine the frequency and length of
the meetings of the committee, except as otherwise provided in the committee's
charter.
Stock Ownership. Directors are encouraged to own a significant equity
interest in the Company within a reasonable period after initial election to the
Board. To more closely align the interests of directors and the Company's
shareholders, a portion of director compensation will be paid in the form of
common stock.
4
<PAGE>
Board Functions
CEO Performance. The Board believes that the CEO's performance should be
evaluated annually, based on both qualitative and quantitative factors, and as a
regular part of any decision with respect to the CEO's compensation.
The Board and the Compensation Committee will share this responsibility
jointly. The Board has delegated responsibility to the Compensation Committee
to evaluate the CEO's performance in the course of recommending the CEO's
compensation. During an executive session of the Board, the Chairman of the
Compensation Committee will report to the Board on the evaluation of the CEO's
performance. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee will review comments of
the Board with the CEO following the executive session, as appropriate.
Approval of Major Strategies and Financial Objectives. Each year the Board
will review and approve the Company's business plan, as well as its long-term
strategic and financial goals. The Board will regularly monitor the Company's
performance with respect to these plans and goals.
Board Evaluation. The Governance Committee, in consultation with the CEO,
will consider and recommend to the Board measures by which the Board can
evaluate the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. The Chairman of the
Governance Committee will present the recommendations to the Board.
Management Succession and Development. The Compensation Committee will
review annually with the CEO management succession planning and development.
The CEO and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee will report to the Board
on management succession and development.
Executive Compensation. The Compensation Committee will review and make
recommendations to the Board concerning all executive officer compensation,
including salary and non-incentive based compensation, and the design of the
Company's incentive compensation plans for executives.
The Company's executive compensation policy is to have compensation
programs that:
. strengthen the relationship between pay and performance;
. attract, retain and encourage the development of highly qualified and
experienced executives;
. promote overall corporate performance; and
. provide compensation that is competitive externally and equitable
internally.
Director Compensation. The Governance Committee, in consultation with the
CEO, will periodically review director compensation in comparison with companies
that are similarly situated to ensure that such compensation is reasonable and
competitive.
Board Operations
Review of Board Operations. The Governance Committee, in consultation with
the CEO, except that if the Chairman of the Board and the CEO are not the same
person, then with the Chairman and the CEO jointly, will periodically review and
make recommendations to the Board regarding Board processes and policies,
including the appropriateness of Board meeting agendas and the frequency and
location of Board meetings. Regular meetings of the Board are now held seven
times per year, and special meetings are held as required.
Meeting Attendance. If a director's cumulative attendance falls below 66%
of Board and committee meetings in the aggregate held over a three-year period,
the director shall offer his or her resignation. The Governance Committee will
make a recommendation to the Board whether the Board should accept the
resignation.
Selection of Agenda Items for Board Meetings. The CEO will establish the
agenda for each Board meeting, except that if the Chairman of the Board and the
CEO are not the same person, then the Chairman and the CEO will
5
<PAGE>
jointly establish the agenda for each Board meeting. Each director is free to
suggest items for inclusion on the agenda, and each director is free to raise at
any Board meeting subjects that are not on the agenda for that meeting.
Pre-meeting Materials. To the extent feasible or appropriate, information
and data important to the directors' understanding of the matters to be
considered, including background summaries of presentations to be made at the
meeting, will be distributed prior to the meeting. Directors also will
routinely be sent monthly financial statements, earnings reports, press
releases, analyst reports and other information designed to keep them informed
of the material aspects of the Company's business, performance and prospects.
Conduct of Meetings. Board meetings will be conducted in a manner that
ensures open communication, meaningful participation and timely resolution of
issues.
Executive Sessions. Executive sessions or meetings of outside directors
without management present will be held at least once each year to review the
report of the outside auditors, the criteria upon which the performance of the
CEO is evaluated, the performance of the CEO against such criteria and the
compensation of the CEO. Additional executive sessions or meetings of outside
directors may be held from time to time as required. Executive sessions or
meetings are held from time to time with the CEO for a general discussion of
relevant subjects.
Board Access to Executive Management. Directors will have complete access
to the Company's executive management. It is assumed that directors will use
judgment to be sure that contact with management is not distracting to the
business operations of the Company.
Other Board Practices
Periodic Review of These Guidelines. These guidelines will be reviewed
periodically by the Governance Committee, in consultation with the CEO, and any
recommended revisions will be submitted to the full Board for action thereon.
Orientation of New Directors. An orientation process for all new directors
will be maintained. This process includes comprehensive background briefings by
the Company's executive officers. The orientation program is the responsibility
of the CEO and is administered by the Corporate Secretary.
BOARD ORGANIZATION AND COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors directs the management of the business and affairs
of the Company. The Board appoints committees to help carry out its duties. Last
year, the Board met 15 times and the committees met a total of 16 times. Each
director attended more than 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and
the committees on which he or she served. As of February 1, 2000, the Company
had the following committees.
The EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE has six members: Mr. Carroll, Mr. Cater, Mr.
Cruikshank, Ms. Deily, Mr. Honea and Mr. Letbetter. This committee reviews
management recommendations for organizational changes and consults on duties of
executive officers. The committee met once in 1999.
The AUDIT COMMITTEE has four non-employee director members: Mr. Carroll,
Mr. Crosswell, Mr. Cruikshank, and Dr. Schilt. This committee oversees
accounting and internal control matters. The committee recommends to the Board
of Directors the selection of the firm of independent public accountants to
audit the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and reviews
and approves the plan and scope of the independent public accountants' audit and
non-audit services and related fees. The committee met three times in 1999.
The FINANCE COMMITTEE has three members: Mr. Cater, Ms. Deily, and Mr.
Hogan. This committee reviews the Company's financial policies and strategies,
including capital structure, and approves specific debt and equity offerings
within limits set by the Board. The committee met once in 1999.
6
<PAGE>
The COMPENSATION COMMITTEE has three non-employee director members: Dr.
Balzhiser, Mr. Cruikshank and Ms. Deily. This committee oversees compensation
and benefits for the Company's senior officers, including salary, bonus and
incentive awards. The committee reviews human resource programs and monitors
and, in certain cases, administers employee benefit plans. The committee's
report on executive compensation begins on page 14. The committee met five
times in 1999.
The GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE has four non-employee director members: Mr. Baker,
Mr. Carroll, Mr. Cater and Mr. Cruikshank. This committee recommends the number
of directors to comprise the Board, evaluates directors whose terms are
expiring, evaluates and recommends potential candidates for election to the
Board, reviews non-employee director compensation, reviews board processes and
policies and other corporate governance issues. In evaluating potential director
nominees, the Governance Committee will consider qualified persons recommended
by shareholders. Any shareholder wishing to make a recommendation should write
to the Corporate Secretary at the Company's address shown above. The committee
met once in 1999.
The NUCLEAR COMMITTEE has three members: Dr. Balzhiser, Mr. Crosswell and
Dr. Schilt. This Committee reviews the Company's nuclear development efforts and
operations and makes recommendations about nuclear regulatory reports and
licensing requirements, management evaluations of nuclear engineering and
construction, and operations progress and performance. The committee met once in
1999.
The UNREGULATED BUSINESS COMMITTEE has three members: Dr. Balzhiser, Ms.
Deily and Mr. Honea. This committee reviews the Company's strategy and
activities in the areas of domestic and foreign independent power generation
projects and the privatization of foreign generating and distribution
facilities. The committee met four times in 1999.
Compensation of Directors
Company employees receive no extra pay for serving as directors.
Compensation for each non-employee director consists of an annual retainer fee
of $30,000, a fee of $1,200 for each board and committee meeting attended and
1,000 shares of Company common stock annually. Directors may defer all or part
of their annual retainer fees and meeting fees under the Company's deferred
compensation plan. The deferred compensation plan currently provides for accrual
of interest on deferred director compensation at a rate equal to the average
annual yield on the Moody's Long-Term Corporate Bond Index plus two percentage
points.
Non-employee directors participate in a director benefits plan under which
a director who serves at least one full year will receive an annual cash amount
equal to the annual retainer in effect the year the director terminates service.
Benefits under this plan commence the January following the later of the
director's termination of service or attainment of age 65, for a period equal to
the number of full years of service of the director.
Non-employee directors may also participate in the Company's executive life
insurance plan described under "Retirement Plans, Related Benefits and Other
Agreements." This plan provides split-dollar life insurance with a death benefit
equal to six times the director's annual retainer with coverage continuing after
termination of service as a director. The plan also permits the Company to
provide for a tax reimbursement payment to make the directors whole for any
imputed income recognized with respect to the term portion of the annual
insurance premiums. Upon death, the Company will receive the balance of the
insurance proceeds payable in excess of the specified death benefit. The plan is
designed so that the proceeds received by the Company are expected to be at
least sufficient to cover the Company's cumulative outlays to pay premiums and
the after-tax cost to the Company of the tax reimbursement payments.
Baker Botts L.L.P. provided legal services to the Company and its
subsidiaries during 1999, and is providing legal services during 2000. Fees for
these services were approximately $14,460,000 in 1999. Class III director Mr.
Baker is a senior partner at that firm.
Mr. Carroll performed consulting services for the Company during 1999 in
connection with deregulation issues, for which he was paid $240,000.
7
<PAGE>
STOCK OWNERSHIP
The following table shows stock ownership of beneficial owners of more than
5% of the Company's common stock, each director, the Chief Executive Officer,
the other most highly compensated executive officers, and the executive officers
and directors as a group, as of March 17, 2000. Each director and officer and
the directors and officers as a group beneficially owns less than 1% of the
Company's outstanding common stock.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Number of Shares
---- --------------------
<S> <C>
Northern Trust Corporation............................................... 35,255,088 (1)
50 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60675
James A. Baker, III...................................................... 3,000
Richard E. Balzhiser..................................................... 2,100
Milton Carroll........................................................... 5,000
John T. Cater............................................................ 2,000 (2)
O. Holcombe Crosswell.................................................... 11,595
Robert J. Cruikshank..................................................... 4,000
Linnet F. Deily.......................................................... 4,000 (3)
Lee W. Hogan............................................................. 133,803 (4)(5)
T. Milton Honea.......................................................... 102,111
Hugh Rice Kelly.......................................................... 163,773 (4)(5)
R. Steve Letbetter....................................................... 278,560 (4)(5)
Stephen W. Naeve......................................................... 123,560 (4)(5)
Joe Bob Perkins.......................................................... 74,289 (4)(5)
Alexander F. Schilt...................................................... 2,800
All of the above and other executive officers as a group (17 persons).... 1,087,307 (4)(5)
</TABLE>
(1) This represents 11.92% of the outstanding common stock of the Company. This
information is as of December 31, 1999 and is based on a Schedule 13G filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2000 by
Northern Trust Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries. The 13G reports
sole voting power for 703,194 shares, shared voting power for 34,517,670
shares, sole dispositive power for 1,005,819 shares and shared dispositive
power for 64,352 shares. The Company understands that the shares reported
include 34,111,957 shares held as trustee of the Company's savings plans.
(2) Does not include 1,000 shares held by an adult child.
(3) Owned jointly with spouse.
(4) Includes shares held under the Company's savings plan, as to which the
participant has sole voting power (subject to such power being exercised by
the plan's trustee in the same proportion as directed shares in the savings
plan are voted in the event the participant does not exercise voting
power).
(5) Includes shares covered by stock options that are exercisable within 60
days as follows: Mr. Hogan--81,001 shares; Mr. Kelly--90,314 shares; Mr.
Letbetter--202,442 shares; Mr. Naeve--82,941 shares; Mr. Perkins--64,708,
and the group--630,927 shares.
8
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
These tables show the compensation of the persons who served as chief
executive officer in 1999 and the four other most highly compensated executive
officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
-------------------------------------
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS
---------------------------------------------- ------------------------ PAYOUTS
OTHER RESTRICTED SECURITIES ----------
NAME AND ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY(1) BONUS(1) COMPENSATION AWARD(2) OPTIONS PAYOUTS(3) COMPENSATION(4)
- ------------------ ---- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R. Steve Letbetter...... 1999 $ 762,083 $1,215,500 $ 372 280,000 $ 449,024 $ 66,136
Chairman, President and 1998 559,583 624,750 65,225 100,000 307,714 50,988
Chief Executive officer 1997 481,250 447,525 266 9,938 151,612 45,727
Lee W. Hogan............ 1999 485,000 464,750 2,536 120,000 313,999 49,332
Vice Chairman 1998 429,167 405,000 61,126 50,000 335,000 34,690
1997 372,917 324,000 1,616 28,194
Stephen W. Naeve........ 1999 453,750 464,750 80 120,000 141,387 48,760
Vice Chairman and 1998 344,167 328,500 61 50,000 105,758 27,296
Chief Financial Officer 1997 294,167 191,363 55 4,777 55,724 23,997
Joe Bob Perkins......... 1999 387,500 396,286 95 100,000 135,757 37,478
President and Chief 1998 266,042 384,000 87 50,000 13,530
Operating Officer, 1997 233,750 113,400 44 3,042 10,727
Wholesale Group
Hugh Rice Kelly......... 1999 387,000 306,735 1,101 65,000 319,593 65,213
Executive Vice President, 1998 370,500 311,850 837 50,000 241,672 47,522
General Counsel and 1997 355,417 218,700 782 6,292 141,497 42,141
Corporate Secretary
Don D. Jordan (5)....... 1999 1,460,000 25,287 5,967,683 9,597,800
Former Chief Executive 1998 1,235,000 1,852,500 97,653 1,025,825 1,256,365
Officer 1997 1,000,000 1,080,000 640,754 $3,525,000 33,803 621,392 1,971,645
</TABLE>
__________
(1) The amounts shown include salary and bonus earned as well as earned but
deferred.
(2) On February 25, 1997, Mr. Jordan received a grant of 150,000 shares of
restricted stock that vested on June 1, 1999. The amount shown is the
closing market price of those shares on February 25, 1997.
(3) Amounts shown for each year represent the dollar value of the Company
common stock paid out in 1999 based on the achievement of performance goals
for the performance cycle ending in 1998, plus dividend equivalent accruals
during the performance period. For Mr. Jordan, the 1999 amount includes
150,000 shares granted in 1997 pursuant to an employment agreement, the
payment of which has been deferred until January 1, 2001.
(4) 1999 amounts include (i) matching contributions to the Company's savings
plans and accruals under the savings restoration plan for contributions as
follows: Mr. Letbetter, $44,697; Mr. Hogan, $35,790; Mr. Naeve, $35,201;
Mr. Perkins, $25,422; Mr. Kelly, $31,448; and Mr. Jordan, $45,000; (ii) the
term portion of the premiums paid by the Company under split-dollar life
insurance policies purchased in connection with the Company's executive
life insurance plan, as follows: Mr. Letbetter, $490; Mr. Hogan, $3,340;
Mr. Naeve, $105; Mr. Perkins, $125; Mr. Kelly, $1,451; and Mr. Jordan,
$33,300; (iii) accrued interest on deferred compensation that exceeds 120%
of the applicable federal long-term rate as follows: Mr. Letbetter,
$20,949; Mr. Hogan, $10,202; Mr. Naeve, $13,454; Mr. Perkins, $11,931; Mr.
Kelly, $32,314; and Mr. Jordan, $1,694,500. For Mr. Jordan, the 1999
amount includes a payment of $7,825,000 pursuant to his separation
agreement based upon Mr. Jordan's anticipated salary for 2000 and Mr.
Jordan's anticipated bonuses for 1999 and 2000, assuming such bonuses were
paid out at the maximum level under the annual incentive plan. The
derivation of these amounts is described in more detail on page 13.
(5) Mr. Jordan retired as Chief Executive Officer on June 1, 1999 and as
Chairman on December 31, 1999.
9
<PAGE>
OPTION GRANTS IN 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EXERCISE/
SHARES % OF 1999 BASE GRANT
UNDERLYING EMPLOYEE PURCHASE DATE
OPTIONS OPTION PRICE PER EXPIRATION PRESENT
NAME GRANTED(1) GRANTS SHARE ($) DATE VALUE(2) $
--------------------------------------- -------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R. Steve Letbetter..................... 280,000 7.36% 26.750000 03/01/09 875,196
Lee W. Hogan........................... 120,000 3.15% 26.750000 03/01/09 375,084
Stephen W. Naeve....................... 100,000 2.63% 26.750000 03/01/09 312,570
20,000 0.52% 29.781250 05/31/09 62,514
Joe Bob Perkins........................ 100,000 2.63% 26.750000 03/01/09 312,570
Hugh Rice Kelly........................ 65,000 1.71% 26.750000 03/01/09 203,171
</TABLE>
________
(1) Option grants vest in one-third increments per year from the date of grant
(so long as the officer remains an employee). All options would immediately
vest upon a change in control as defined in the Company's long-term incentive
plan. A "change in control" generally is deemed to have occurred if (a) any
person or group becomes the direct or indirect beneficial owner of 30% or more
of the Company's outstanding voting securities; (b) the majority of the Board
changes as a result of or in connection with, certain transactions; (c) as a
result of a merger or consolidation, less than 70% of the surviving
corporation's outstanding voting securities is owned by former shareholders of
the Company (excluding any party to the transaction or their affiliates); (d)
a tender offer or exchange offer is made and consummated for the ownership of
30% or more of the Company's outstanding voting securities; or (e) the Company
transfers all or substantially all of its assets to another corporation that
is not wholly owned by the Company.
(2) Grant date value is based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming
a ten-year term, volatility of 21.23%, an annual dividend of $1.50 per
share, and a risk-free interest rate of 5.10%. Actual gains, if any, will be
dependent on future performance of the common stock.
1999 YEAR END OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
NAME(1) DECEMBER 31, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1999(2)
- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE
------------------------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R. Steve Letbetter...................... 72,463 349,980 $ 60,013 $2,381
Lee W. Hogan............................ 24,334 153,334 4,466
Stephen W. Naeve........................ 31,349 154,926 21,101 1,144
Joe Bob Perkins......................... 18,694 134,348 1,458 729
Hugh Rice Kelly......................... 49,884 100,431 47,412 1,507
Don D. Jordan........................... 178,140 242,057
</TABLE>
_______
(1) None of the named officers exercised any options in 1999.
(2) Based on the average of the high and low sales prices of the Common Stock on
the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape, as reported in The Wall Street
Journal for December 31, 1999.
10
<PAGE>
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE--PLAN AWARDS IN 1999(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER
NON-STOCK PRICE-BASED PLANS(2)
------------------------------------------------
PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD TARGET MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF PERIOD UNTIL NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER
NAME SHARES PAYOUT OF SHARES OF SHARES OF SHARES
- ---------------------------------------------- -------------- ------------ -------------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R. Steve Letbetter............................ 14,172 12/31/01 7,086 14,172 21,258
Lee W. Hogan.................................. 8,124 12/31/01 4,062 8,124 12,186
Stephen W. Naeve.............................. 8,535 12/31/01 4,268 8,535 12,803
Joe Bob Perkins............................... 5,495 12/31/01 2,747 5,495 8,242
Hugh Rice Kelly............................... 5,226 12/31/01 2,613 5,226 7,839
</TABLE>
____________
(1) Amounts shown are potential payouts of awards of common stock under the
Company's long-term incentive plan. These awards have a three-year performance
cycle. Payouts will be based on growth in earnings per share, total
shareholder return and cash return on capitalization. If a change in control
occurs, such amounts will be paid in cash at the maximum level, without regard
to the achievement of performance goals. See the Report of the Compensation
Committee on page 14 for more information about the long-term incentive plan.
(2) The table does not reflect dividend equivalent accruals during the
performance period.
RETIREMENT PLANS, RELATED BENEFITS AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS
PENSION PLAN TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FINAL AVERAGE ESTIMATED ANNUAL PENSION BASED ON YEARS OF SERVICE(2)($)
ANNUAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION
AT AGE 65(1) ($) 15 20 25 30 35
- ---------------- -------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
500,000 143,183 190,911 238,639 286,367 334,095
750,000 215,933 287,911 359,889 431,867 503,845
1,000,000 288,683 384,911 481,139 577,367 673,595
1,250,000 361,433 481,911 602,389 722,867 843,345
1,500,000 434,183 578,911 723,639 868,367 1,013,095
1,750,000 506,933 675,911 844,889 1,013,867 1,182,845
2,000,000 579,683 772,911 966,139 1,159,367 1,352,595
2,250,000 652,433 869,911 1,087,389 1,304,867 1,522,345
2,500,000 725,183 966,911 1,208,639 1,450,367 1,692,095
2,750,000 797,933 1,063,911 1,329,889 1,595,867 1,861,845
3,000,000 870,683 1,160,911 1,451,139 1,741,367 2,031,595
3,250,000 943,433 1,257,911 1,572,389 1,886,867 2,201,345
3,500,000 1,016,183 1,354,911 1,693,639 2,032,367 2,371,095
3,750,000 1,088,933 1,451,911 1,814,889 2,177,867 2,540,845
4,000,000 1,161,683 1,548,911 1,936,139 2,323,367 2,710,595
4,250,000 1,234,433 1,645,911 2,057,389 2,468,867 2,880,345
</TABLE>
- -----------
(1) Effective January 1, 1999, the retirement plan provides a new cash balance
benefit formula in place of the final average pay formula on which the
benefits shown above are based. Retirement benefits for persons retiring on
or before December 31, 2008 will be based on the higher of the benefit
calculated under the final average pay formula and that calculated under
the new formula. For the named officers, benefits under the amended plan
are not expected to exceed the amounts reflected in the table. Final
average annual compensation means the highest compensation for 36
consecutive months out of the 120 consecutive months immediately preceding
retirement. It includes only salary and bonus amounts. At December 31,
1999, the credited years of service for the following persons were: 26
years for Mr. Letbetter; 9 years for Mr. Hogan; 25 years for Mr. Kelly (10
of which result from a supplemental agreement); 27 years for Mr. Naeve; 3
years for Mr. Perkins; and 35 years for Mr. Jordan. Under a supplemental
agreement with Mr. Hogan, upon the earliest of his normal retirement,
disability or death, Mr. Hogan will be eligible for supplemental pension
benefits determined as if his employment had commenced 15 years prior to
his first day of actual employment with the Company.
11
<PAGE>
(2) Amounts are determined on a single-life annuity basis and are not subject
to any deduction for Social Security or other offsetting amounts. The
qualified pension plan limits compensation and benefits in accordance with
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Pension benefits based on
compensation above the qualified plan limit or in excess of the limit on
annual benefits are provided through the benefits restoration plan.
The Company maintains an executive benefits plan that provides certain
salary continuation, disability and death benefits to certain key officers of
the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. All of the named officers
participate in this plan pursuant to individual agreements that generally
provide for (i) a salary continuation benefit of 100% of the officer's current
salary for 12 months after death during active employment and then 50% of salary
for nine years or until the deceased officer would have attained age 65, if
later, and (ii) if the officer retires after attainment of age 65, an annual
postretirement death benefit of 50% of the officer's preretirement annual salary
payable for six years. Coverage under this plan has not been provided to persons
attaining executive officer status after July 1, 1996.
The Company has an executive life insurance plan providing split-dollar
life insurance in the form of a death benefit for officers and members of the
Board of Directors. The death benefit coverage varies but in each case is based
on coverage (either single life or second to die) that is available for the same
amount of premium that could purchase coverage equal to four times current
salary for Messrs. Letbetter and Hogan; two times current salary for Mr. Kelly
and Mr. Naeve; $6,000,000 for Mr. Perkins; $30,000,000 for Mr. Jordan; and six
times the annual retainer for the Company's non-employee directors. The plan
also provides that the Company may make payments to the covered individuals to
compensate for tax consequences of imputed income that they must recognize for
federal income tax purposes based on the term portion of the annual premiums. If
a covered executive retires at age 65 or at an earlier age under circumstances
approved by the Board of Directors, rights under the plan vest so that coverage
is continued based on the same death benefit in effect at the time of
retirement. Upon death, the Company will receive the balance of the insurance
proceeds payable in excess of the specified death benefit, which is expected to
be at least sufficient to cover the Company's cumulative outlays to pay premiums
and the after-tax cost to the Company of the tax reimbursement payments. There
is no arrangement or understanding under which any covered individuals will
receive or be allocated any interest in any cash surrender value under the
policy.
Since 1985, the Company has had in effect deferred compensation plans which
permit eligible participants to elect each year to defer a percentage of that
year's salary (prior to December 1993 up to 25% or 40%, depending on age, and
beginning in December 1993, up to 100%) and up to 100% of that year's annual
bonus. In general, employees who attain the age of 60 during employment and
participate in the Company's deferred compensation plans may elect to have their
deferred compensation amounts repaid in (i) fifteen equal annual installments
commencing at the later of age 65 or termination of employment or (ii) a lump-
sum distribution following termination of employment. Directors participating in
these plans are entitled to receive distributions at age 70 or upon leaving the
Board, whichever is later. Interest generally accrues on deferrals made in 1989
and subsequent years at a rate equal to the average Moody's Long-Term Corporate
Bond Index plus 2%, determined annually until termination when the rate is fixed
at the greater of the rate in effect at age 64 or at age 65. Fixed rates of 19%
to 24% were established for deferrals made in 1985 through 1988, as a result of
then-higher prevailing rates and other factors. Current accruals of the above-
market portion of the interest on deferred compensation amounts are included in
the "All Other Compensation" column of the Summary Compensation Table.
The Company and one of its subsidiaries, Reliant Energy International,
Inc., are parties to a trust agreement with an independent trustee establishing
a "rabbi trust" for the purpose of funding benefits payable to participants
(which include each of the named officers) under the Company's deferred
compensation plans, executive incentive compensation plans, benefits restoration
plan and savings restoration plan (Designated Plans). The trust is a grantor
trust, irrevocable except in the event of an unfavorable ruling by the Internal
Revenue Service as to the tax status of the trust or certain changes in tax law.
It is currently funded with a nominal amount of cash. The Company and Reliant
Energy International, Inc. are required to make future contributions to the
grantor trust when required by the provisions of the Designated Plans or when
required by the Company's benefits committee. The benefits committee consists of
officers of the Company designated by the Board of Directors and has general
responsibility for funding decisions and selection of investment managers for
the Company's retirement plan and other administrative matters in connection
with other employee benefit plans of the Company. If there is a change in
control (defined in a manner generally the same as the comparable definition in
the Company's long-term incentive compensation plan),
12
<PAGE>
the Company and Reliant Energy International, Inc. are required to fully fund
the grantor trust, within 15 days following the change in control, with an
amount equal to the entire benefit to which each participant would be entitled
under the Designated Plans as of the date of the change in control (calculated
on the basis of the present value of the projected future benefits payable under
the Designated Plans). The assets of the grantor trust are required to be held
separate and apart from the other funds of the Company and its subsidiaries, but
remain subject to claims of general creditors under applicable state and federal
law.
Under an agreement dated March 1999, Mr. Jordan stepped down as chief
executive officer effective June 1, 1999 and agreed to continue his employment
as Chairman of the Board until December 31, 2000. On December 1, 1999, with the
consent of the Board of Directors, the Company and Mr. Jordan agreed that he
would retire from the position of Chairman of the Board on December 31, 1999.
The Company reached this agreement to accelerate Mr. Jordan's retirement based
on the positive progress in the transition of leadership from Mr. Jordan to Mr.
Letbetter, the interests of the Company and its shareholders in moving forward
with the transition process, and the value of Mr. Jordan's efforts in
effectuating this transition.
The March 1999 agreement provided for an annual salary of $1,460,000,
annual bonus awards under the Company's executive incentive compensation plan
and for participation in other employee benefit plans and programs on generally
the same basis as other peer executives. In addition, the March 1999 agreement
provided that if Mr. Jordan retired before the end of his employment term with
the consent of the Board or in certain other circumstances, the Company would
pay Mr. Jordan a lump-sum equal to his salary and all bonuses payable to him
through December 31, 2000 and any accrued vacation pay, would continue welfare
benefit coverage until that date, and would fulfill certain obligations
generally applicable upon termination of employment. In connection with Mr.
Jordan's retirement, the Company agreed to reimburse him for expenses incurred
in representing the Company's interests in certain activities. The March 1999
agreement also provided for the deferral of delivery to him of a 1997 award of
150,000 shares of time-based restricted stock and 150,000 shares of performance-
based restricted stock that were to vest on June 1, 1999, until the date 30 days
following his termination of employment, with crediting of dividend equivalents
during the deferral period into an interest-bearing account.
Under a December 1, 1999 agreement that provided for Mr. Jordan's early
retirement, for purposes of computing his lump-sum termination payment, his
benefits under the benefit restoration plan, and his benefits under the
executive benefit plan, Mr. Jordan's 2000 salary was deemed to be $1,635,000,
and his bonuses under the executive incentive compensation plan were deemed to
have been achieved at the maximum level. Mr. Jordan's payouts under the
Company's long-term incentive compensation plan for the 1997-1999 performance
cycle (the last cycle under which Mr. Jordan received a grant), were made in
January 2000 in accordance with the provisions of that plan. The December 1999
agreement also provided for continued deferral until January 1, 2001 of the
previously mentioned 1997 awards of restricted stock.
The March 1999 agreement provided for an extension of the commencement date
of the 15 annual installment payments of salary and bonus previously deferred
under the Company's deferred compensation plans until June 1, 2002. In addition,
the December 1999 agreement provided that Mr. Jordan's lump-sum payments under
this deferred compensation plan will commence as soon as practical following
January 1, 2001, rather than January 1, 2000. The December 1999 separation
agreement also provided for Mr. Jordan's deemed 2000 salary and his deemed bonus
under the executive incentive compensation plan for the years 1999 and 2000 to
be paid in December 1999 and to be subject to Mr. Jordan's current deferral
election under the deferred compensation plan.
In November 1997, the Company entered into severance agreements with
certain executive officers, including Mr. Letbetter, Mr. Hogan, Mr. Kelly, Mr.
Naeve and Mr. Perkins. These severance agreements provide for the payment of
certain benefits in the event of a covered termination of employment occurring
within three years after the occurrence of a Change in Control. A "covered
termination" occurs if the officer's employment is terminated for reasons other
than death, disability, termination on or after age 65, termination for Cause
(as defined), or resignation by the officer (unless the resignation occurs
during a 61-day period commencing on the date the officer experiences a
significant reduction in his duties, remuneration, or principal place of
employment following or in anticipation of a Change in Control). Under the
agreements, an officer experiencing a covered termination of employment will be
entitled to payment of three times a prescribed covered compensation amount as
13
<PAGE>
well as certain welfare benefits. An officer's covered compensation amount for
this purpose is the sum of his annual salary, target annual bonus (currently
ranging from 55 % to 100% of base salary) and (for all officers except
Mr. Perkins) an amount based on the maximum payout under the officer's grant of
performance-based restricted stock under the Company's long-term incentive
compensation plan (stated as a percentage of base salary, currently ranging from
60% to 90%). The agreements also provide for certain additional benefits,
including reimbursement of certain expenses associated with obtaining new
employment, providing financial planning services, providing benefits under the
Company's supplemental retirement plans (calculated as if the affected officer
had remained employed throughout a three-year period following the Change in
Control), and a tax gross-up payment in an amount necessary to make the officer
whole for any excise, income or other taxes paid as a result of the severance
payments. The agreements expire in September 2000.
Generally, a "Change in Control" is deemed to occur if (i) the individuals
constituting the Board of Directors of the Company on September 1, 1997,
including their designated successors (Incumbent Directors) cease to constitute
a majority of the Board; (ii) an individual, entity or group acquires beneficial
ownership of 30% or more of the Company's outstanding voting stock, unless the
acquisition is from the Company in a transaction approved by a majority of the
Incumbent Directors; (iii) a merger or other business combination involving the
Company is consummated unless, immediately following the transaction, (a) the
Company's stockholders prior to the business combination own more than 70% of
the outstanding shares of voting stock of the resulting parent entity in the
same relative proportions, (b) the total fair market value of any consideration
paid to another entity or its stockholders, plus the amount of long-term debt of
the entity acquired does not exceed 50% of the sum (determined prior to the
transaction) of the fair market value of the Company's outstanding voting stock
and the amount of its consolidated long-term debt, (c) there is not a 30%
stockholder of the resulting parent entity and (d) a majority of the board of
the resulting parent entity after the transaction were Incumbent Directors
immediately prior to consummation of the business combination; or (iv) there is
a disposition of 70% or more of the assets of the Company and its consolidated
subsidiaries unless, immediately following the transaction, the Company's
stockholders prior to such transaction own more than 70% of the then-outstanding
shares of voting stock of the Company and of the parent entity that acquires the
largest portion of such assets and a majority of the members of the board of
directors of the Company and of such acquiring parent entity were Incumbent
Directors immediately prior to the transaction.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of non-employee directors,
who are not eligible to participate in any of the compensation programs that the
Committee administers. The Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the
Board concerning all executive officer compensation. The Committee oversees and
administers the Company's incentive compensation programs, including the
determination of the annual and long-term incentive awards to the Company's
executive officers.
Compensation Policy. The Company's executive compensation policy is to have
compensation programs that:
. strengthen the relationship between pay and performance;
. attract, retain and encourage the development of highly qualified and
experienced executives;
. promote overall corporate performance; and
. provide compensation that is competitive externally and equitable
internally.
The Company retains an independent consulting firm each year to review the
executive compensation practices of companies considered comparable to the
Company in terms of size, type of business, performance, position and
compensation philosophy. In response to the increased competition in the energy
industry and changes in the size and mix of the Company's business, the database
is comprised of both traditional utility and general industry companies. The
companies included in the data are not the companies listed in the S&P Electric
Companies Index used in the creation of the "Stock Performance Graph" on page 17
because the Committee believes that the
14
<PAGE>
Company's most direct competitors for executive talent are not in all cases the
same as the companies included in the index chosen for comparing shareholder
returns. In applying the information in the database, the Company utilizes a
total compensation approach; that is, the total value of base salary, annual and
long-term incentives is considered in establishing ranges for the Company's
executives. As a result, a larger portion of the executive officer's
compensation is performance-based, through the annual and long-term plans. In
evaluating individual executive officers, the Company uses comparative data from
the most relevant companies in the database. For example, the total compensation
of an executive officer in the regulated utility operations of the Company is
compared to data for other electric utility companies in the database.
The Committee also obtains peer group data regarding companies in the utility
industry, the non-regulated power industry and other industries. This industry-
specific data is used primarily in the formulation of performance measurements
related to the Company's individual subsidiaries or business units.
In addition to considering comparative data and other peer groups, the
Committee makes its own subjective determination of executive officer
performance. In making such determinations, the Committee also takes into
account the chief executive officer's evaluations of other executive officers'
performance.
The Committee periodically evaluates the Company's executive compensation
programs in light of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code; this section
does not permit the Company to deduct compensation in excess of $1,000,000 for
certain executive officers unless certain requirements are met. Taking into
account expected deferrals of compensation, the Committee does not anticipate
any affected officer's compensation to exceed the deductibility limits. Other
than the long-term incentive awards established for Wholesale Group, the
performance goals under the Company's long-term incentive plan should be
deductible since the goals are performance-based and were approved by the
Company's shareholders. As described on page 17, the Company is asking
shareholders to approve performance goals for the annual incentive plan. If
approved, performance-based awards under that plan will qualify for a deduction.
The Company reserves the right to structure compensation in a manner not
eligible for a deduction.
Components of Compensation. The key elements of the Company's executive
compensation program are base salary, annual incentive awards and long-term
incentive awards. The Committee evaluates each element of compensation
separately and in relation to the other elements of an executive's total
compensation package, taking into consideration relevant comparative data for
compensation at the 50th percentile and 75th percentile. Compared to companies
in the database, total targeted compensation may vary from the 50th percentile,
depending on an executive officer's tenure, experience, leadership and level of
responsibility. Because a significant portion of an executive officer's
compensation includes at-risk components based on business performance, if the
performance exceeds that of the relevant peer group, compensation should be
above the targeted levels; likewise, if performance falls below that of the peer
group, compensation should be below the targeted level.
Base Salaries. The Committee's annual recommendations to the Board
concerning each executive officer's base salary are based on the Committee's
analysis of salary levels for comparable executive officer positions, its
subjective evaluation and, other than for Mr. Letbetter, management's evaluation
of each executive officer's individual performance and level of responsibility.
Annual Incentive Compensation. The annual incentive plan provides executive
officers with annual bonuses based on the achievement of Committee-approved
performance goals based upon certain financial objectives of the Company. The
goals are designed to encourage improved operating results and foster
achievement of particular strategic objectives. Performance goals for 1999 were
primarily based on earnings per share. Certain officers also had business unit
goals that affected a portion of their performance goals.
Annual incentive awards for executive officers in 1999 were possible at a
threshold level (50% payout), a target level (100% payout) or a maximum level
(50% to 100% over target, depending on the business unit). The individual
officers had award levels that ranged from 45% to 100% of base salary, depending
on the executive officer's level of responsibility. For 1999, the goals for most
of the Company's executive officers (including all the Named Officers) were
achieved at levels that resulted in bonuses paid ranging from 11% over target to
49% over target.
15
<PAGE>
Long-term Incentive Compensation. The long-term incentive plan provides for
grants of performance shares, stock options and stock appreciation rights. In
addition, a stock ownership guideline applicable to all of the officers sets a
goal of common stock ownership equal to two times the officer's base salary.
Under the plan, officers receive awards of performance shares based on
financial objectives measurable over a three-year performance cycle. For the
performance cycle that ended in 1998 (and paid in 1999), goals included a
combination of corporate and business unit goals, weighted 25% and 75% of the
total, respectively. The corporate goal for this performance cycle was based on
the Company's ranking in total return to shareholders compared to a group of
other electric utilities and utility holding companies. The business unit goals
were based on, for the electric utility operations, improvements in cash flow
and improvements in competitive position with respect to cost reduction and
revenue growth, and, for the non-regulated power business, achievement of
specified internal rates of return for particular projects and the closing of
transactions related to particular projects. For the performance cycles that
begin in 1999, performance goals consisted of three factors: growth in earnings
per share (40% weighting), total return to shareholders (40% weighting) and cash
return on capitalization (20% weighting), in each case relative to the S&P
Electric Companies Index.
In determining the size of the grant, the Committee reviews comparative
data, considers the level of responsibility of each of the Company's executive
officers and the recommendations of the chief executive officer, and then makes
a subjective determination of the appropriate target so that the award is in a
range of 40% to 60% of base salary.
Payout levels under plan are calculated by determining the percentage of
achievement of each goal. For each performance goal there are three possible
levels of achievement: threshold (for a payout of 50%), target (for a payout of
100%), or maximum (for a payout of 150%). Achievement levels between threshold,
target, and maximum result in payout levels that are adjusted proportionately.
The payout to the officer is made based on the weighting for each goal that was
assigned by the Committee.
For the performance cycle concluding in 1998 that paid out in 1999 the
composite goals for the Company's executive officers were achieved at levels
that resulted in a maximum payout.
Annual grants of stock options are made at an option price not less than the
fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. This design is
intended to focus executive officers on the creation of shareholder value over
the long-term and encourage equity ownership in the Company.
In determining the size of stock option grants to executive officers, the
Committee reviews comparative data. For 1999, grants ranged from 45,000 to
280,000 options, depending on the executive officer's position.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation. The Company's consultant prepared an
independent report on the Chief Executive Officer's compensation, considering
the Company's size, complexity and markets in which it competes for talent. In
June 1999, when Mr. Letbetter assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer, based
on a review of that market data, the Committee adjusted Mr. Letbetter's annual
base salary to $850,000 and adjusted his annual incentive target to 100% of base
salary. Also based upon the market data, the Committee granted Mr. Letbetter
options to purchase 280,000 shares of common stock. In 1999, Mr. Letbetter also
received a payout under the long-term incentive plan as described above. In
evaluating Mr. Letbetter's total compensation, the Committee also considered his
contributions to the success of the Company through his individual performance,
his experience with the Company, and his participation in important industry
organizations such as the Electric Power Research Institute, the Association of
Electric Companies of Texas, and the American Gas Association. The Committee
believes that Mr. Letbetter's compensation package will ensure his focus on
creating substantial improvements in
16
<PAGE>
shareholder value. Based on the market data prepared for the Committee and Mr.
Letbetter's recent election as Chief Executive Officer, the Committee believes
that Mr. Letbetter's total compensation will be under the 50th percentile of the
market when incentive plan performance expectations are met.
Robert J. Cruikshank
Richard E. Balzhiser
Linnet F. Deily
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph shows the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total
shareholder return on the common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the S&P Electric
Companies Index for the period from December 31, 1994 to December 31, 1999.
FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN(1)(2)
[GRAPH]
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Reliant Energy, Incorporated...... $100 $119 $119 $150 $190 $176
S&P Electric Companies Index...... $100 $114 $114 $144 $166 $154
S&P 500 Index..................... $100 $139 $171 $229 $294 $351
(1) Assumes that the value of the investment in common stock and each index was
$100 on December 31, 1994 and that all dividends were reinvested.
(2) Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future
price performance.
PROPOSAL REGARDING ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
The Board of Directors has adopted the Reliant Energy, Incorporated Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan. The plan is intended to encourage a high level of
corporate performance through the establishment of predetermined corporate and
individual goals. The achievement of these goals will require a high degree of
competence and diligence on the part of those employees of the Company selected
to participate in the Plan.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code does not permit deductions for
compensation in excess of $1,000,000 for some executive officers unless
specified requirements are met. There is an exception to this limit for
performance-based compensation where the material terms of the performance goals
have been approved by shareholders and certain other requirements are satisfied.
Shareholders must approve the class of employees
17
<PAGE>
eligible to participate, general performance criteria on which performance goals
are based, and the formula used to calculate the maximum amount of compensation
that a participant may receive if the goals are met. The performance goals for
the 2000 plan year are subject to approval of the plan by shareholders at the
annual meeting. If the shareholders approve the plan, the Company expects that
all awards under the plan will qualify as performance-based compensation under
Code Section 162(m).
A summary of the plan follows. A complete copy of the plan is attached as
Exhibit A. The Compensation Committee administers the Plan. The Committee may
delegate its duties under the Plan to the Chief Executive Officer and to other
senior officers of the Company. Employees of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries who are regular or part-time employees, who regularly work at least
20 hours per week and who are generally employed at least 90 days during the
plan year are eligible to participate in the plan. All or part of an award may
be subject to conditions established by the Committee, which may include
continuous service, achievement of specific individual and/or business
objectives and other measures of performance.
The Committee determines the terms and conditions of awards and designates
the recipients. Generally, awards are based on a percentage of base salary.
For 1999, awards were based on base salary as of December 31, 1999. Beginning in
2000, awards will be based on actual base salary paid to the participant during
the plan year, including vacation, holiday and sick time. Overtime is not
included in compensation for exempt employees but is included for non-exempt
employees. For any participant covered by a collective bargaining agreement,
compensation is calculated in the manner specified in the collective bargaining
agreement.
For performance awards, the Committee must establish objective goals within
the first 90 days of the performance period or within the first 25% of the
performance period, whichever is earlier, and in any event, while the outcome is
substantially uncertain. A performance goal is objective if a third party
having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether the goal has been
met. A performance goal may be based on one or more business criteria that
apply to the individual, one or more business units of the Company, or the
Company as a whole. Beginning with 2000, performance goals will be based on one
or more of the following financial factors: earnings per share, earnings per
share growth, total shareholder return, economic value added, cash return on
capitalization, increased revenue, revenue ratios (per employee or per
customer), net income, stock price, market share, return on equity, return on
assets, return on capital, return on capital compared to cost of capital,
shareholder value, net cash flow, operating income, earnings before interest and
taxes, cash flow, cash flow from operations, cost reductions, cost ratios (per
employee or per customer), proceeds from dispositions, project completion time
and budget goals, net cash flow before financing activities, customer growth and
total market value.
Performance goals need not be based on a positive result under a particular
business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or
limiting economic losses. Goals may also be based on performance relative to the
S&P 500 Electric Utilities Panel or other designated peer groups. The Committee
may decrease the amount payable pursuant to a performance award, but in no event
may the Committee increase such amount other than as provided in Section 162(m).
No participant may be granted performance awards that would result in the
payment of more than $3,500,000 per plan year.
Before paying any performance award, the Committee must certify in writing
that the applicable performance goals were satisfied. Awards will be paid in
cash as soon as practicable after the close of the plan year. Participants must
generally be employees on the payment date in order to receive payment of an
award. However, if prior to the payment date, a participant retires, dies or
terminates employment due to a disability as defined in the Company's long-term
disability plan, as soon as practicable following such termination, the
participant will receive a prorated award payment based on the participant's
target award. If a participant is an employee on the last day of the plan year
but is not an employee on the payment date, then the participant may receive, at
the discretion of the Committee, an award payment. Award payments under the Plan
are considered compensation under the retirement plan and the savings plan.
The Plan may be amended, modified, suspended, or terminated by the Board of
Directors in order to address any changes in legal requirements or for any other
purpose permitted by law, except that no amendment that would adversely affect
the rights of any participant under any award previously granted may be made
without the
18
<PAGE>
consent of the participant, and no amendment may be effective prior to its
approval by the shareholders of the Company, if such approval is required by
law.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ADOPTION OF THE PLAN.
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS
The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, has
appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants and auditors to
conduct the annual audit of the Company's accounts for the year 2000. Deloitte &
Touche LLP (and their predecessors) have served as independent accountants and
auditors for the Company and its predecessors since 1932. Ratification requires
the affirmative vote of a majority of shares of Common Stock voted for or
against the matter. If the appointment is not ratified by the shareholders, the
Board will reconsider the appointment.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the annual meeting
and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they wish. They will be
available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders at the meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE
APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2001 ANNUAL MEETING
Any shareholder who intends to present a proposal at the 2001 annual
meeting of shareholders and who requests inclusion of the proposal in the
Company's 2001 proxy statement and form of proxy in accordance with applicable
SEC rules must file such proposal with the Company by November 29, 2000.
The Company's bylaws also require advance notice of other proposals by
shareholders to be presented for action at an annual meeting. In the case of the
2001 annual meeting, the required notice must be received by the Company's
Corporate Secretary between November 4, 2000 and February 2, 2001. The proposal
must constitute a proper subject to be brought before the meeting and the notice
must contain prescribed information, including a description of the proposal and
the reasons for bringing it before the meeting, proof of the proponent's status
as a shareholder and the number of shares held and a description of all
arrangements and understandings between the proponent and anyone else in
connection with the proposal. If the proposal is for an amendment of the bylaws,
the notice must also include the text of the proposal and be accompanied by an
opinion of counsel to the effect the proposal would not conflict with the
Company's Restated Articles of Incorporation or Texas law. A copy of the Bylaws
describing the requirements for notice of shareholder proposals may be obtained
by writing Mr. Hugh Rice Kelly, Corporate Secretary, at the Company's address
shown above.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR 2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
The Company's bylaws provide that a shareholder may nominate a director for
election if the shareholder sends a notice to the Company's Corporate Secretary
identifying any other person making such nomination with the shareholder and
providing proof of shareholder status. This notice must be received at the
Company's principal executive offices between November 4, 2000 and February 2,
2001. The shareholder must also provide the information about the nominee that
would be required to be disclosed in the proxy statement. The Company is not
required to include any shareholder proposed nominee in the proxy statement. A
copy of the Bylaws describing the requirements for nomination of director
candidates by shareholders may be obtained by writing Mr. Hugh Rice Kelly,
Corporate Secretary, at the Company's address shown above.
19
<PAGE>
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Company began mailing this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card
to shareholders on March 29, 2000. The proxy statement and proxy card are being
furnished at the direction of the Board of Directors. The Company will pay all
solicitation costs, including the fee of Morrow & Co., who will help the Company
solicit proxies for $9,500, plus expenses. The Company will reimburse brokerage
firms, nominees, fiduciaries, custodians, and other agents for their expenses in
distributing proxy material to the beneficial owners of the Company's common
stock. In addition, certain of the Company's directors, officers, and employees
may solicit proxies by telephone and personal contact.
The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any other matters before the
meeting and has not been informed that any other matters are to be properly
presented to the meeting by others. If other business is properly raised, your
proxy card authorizes the people named as proxies to vote as they think best.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1935 requires the Company's
directors, executive officers, and holders of more than 10% of the Company's
common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of
changes in ownership of the Company's common stock. The Company believes that
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, its officers and directors
complied with these filing requirements.
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
The Summary Annual Report to Shareholders, together with the Appendix A--
1999 Financial Statements, which contains the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 1999, accompany the proxy material
being mailed to all shareholders. The Summary Annual Report is not a part of the
proxy solicitation material.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ R. S. Letbetter
--------------------------------------
R. Steve Letbetter
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2000
20
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT "A"
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1999)
RECITALS
Reliant Energy, Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the "Company"),
with its principal place of business in Houston, Harris County, Texas,
established an Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1991
(the "Prior Plan"), for the benefit of its eligible employees and retained the
right to amend the Prior Plan under Section 18 thereof. The Prior Plan has been
continued and is still in effect.
Effective as of January 1, 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized the amendment, restatement and continuation of the Prior Plan, as in
effect on December 31, 1998, in the form of this plan (the "Plan") to make
certain changes therein. The Plan is intended to supersede and replace the
annual incentive awards portion of the NorAm Energy Corp. 1994 Incentive Equity
Plan, the NorAm Energy Corp. Annual Incentive Plan, the NorAm Energy Corp. All
Employee Incentive Plan, the Minnegasco Variable Pay Plan, the ARKLA All
Employee Variable Pay Plan, the Entex 1996 Business Performance Pay Plan, the
Minnegasco Growth Results Management Team Six by '96 Supplemental Incentive
Plan, the Sales Incentive Program for Safety Plus Sales Reps and all other
existing annual incentive bonus plans or policies maintained by the Company and
all participating Subsidiaries.
There shall be no termination and no gap or lapse in time or effect
between the Prior Plan and this Plan. The amendment, restatement and
continuation of the Prior Plan in the form of this Plan shall not operate to
exclude, diminish, limit or restrict the payments or continuation of payments of
benefits to Participants under the terms of the Prior Plan as in effect prior to
its amendment, restatement and continuation in the form of this Plan. Except to
the extent otherwise required to reflect the fact that benefits accrued under
the Prior Plan are continued under this Plan, the provisions of this Plan shall
apply only to an employee eligible to participate under this Plan on or after
January 1, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 1999, the Company hereby
amends, restates in its entirety and continues the Reliant Energy, Incorporated
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan as follows:
1. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Plan is to encourage a high level of
corporate performance through the establishment of predetermined corporate,
Subsidiary or business unit and/or individual goals, the attainment of which
will require a high degree of competence and diligence on the part of those
Employees (including officers) of the Company or of its participating
Subsidiaries selected to participate in the Plan, and which will be beneficial
to the owners and customers of the Company.
2. DEFINITIONS: Unless the context otherwise clearly requires, the
following definitions are applicable to the Plan:
AWARD: An incentive compensation award payable in cash granted to a
Participant with respect to a particular Plan Year pursuant to any
applicable terms, conditions and limitations as the Committee may establish
in order to fulfill the objectives of the Plan.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS or BOARD: The Board of Directors of the Company.
CODE: The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to
time.
COMMITTEE: The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
COMPANY: Reliant Energy, Incorporated, or any successor thereto.
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION: For the 1999 Plan Year, Compensation means the
Participant's annual rate of base salary in effect on the last day of the
Plan Year. Effective January 1, 2000, Compensation means the actual base
salary paid to the Participant during the Plan Year, including vacation,
holiday and sick time. Overtime is not included in Compensation for exempt
Employees, but is included for non-exempt Employees in a manner consistent
with the requirements of applicable labor law. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, any Participant covered by the terms of a collective bargaining
agreement shall have his Compensation calculated in the manner specified in
the collective bargaining agreement.
EMPLOYEE: An employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries who
is a regular full or part-time employee and who regularly works at least 20
hours per week.
EMPLOYER: The Company and each Subsidiary which is designated by the
Committee as an Employer under this Plan.
PARTICIPANT: An Employee who is selected to participate in the Plan.
PERFORMANCE AWARD: An Award made to a Participant pursuant to this
Plan that is subject to the attainment of one or more Performance Goals.
PERFORMANCE GOALS: The performance objectives of the Company, its
Subsidiaries or its business units and/or individual Participants
established for the purpose of determining the level of Awards, if any,
earned during a Plan Year.
PLAN: This Reliant Energy, Incorporated Annual Incentive Compensation
Plan, as amended from time to time.
PLAN YEAR: The calendar year.
RETIREMENT PLAN: The Reliant Energy, Incorporated Retirement Plan, as
amended and restated effective January 1, 1999 and as thereafter amended.
SAVINGS PLAN: The Reliant Energy, Incorporated Savings Plan, as
amended and restated effective April 1, 1999 and as thereafter amended.
SUBSIDIARY: A subsidiary corporation with respect to the Company as
defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.
A pronoun or adjective in the masculine gender includes the feminine
gender, and the singular includes the plural, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise.
3. PARTICIPATION: The Committee (or its appropriately designated
delegate) shall select the Employees who will be Participants for each Plan
Year. Only Employees who are employed at least 90 days during the Plan Year and
are employed on the last day of the Plan Year are eligible for the payment of an
Award under the Plan, except as provided in Section 7(c). No Employee shall at
any time have the right (a) to be selected as a Participant in the Plan for any
Plan Year, (b) if so selected, to be entitled to an Award, or (c) if selected as
a Participant in one Plan Year, to be selected as a Participant in any
subsequent Plan Year.
The terms and conditions under which a Participant may participate in
the Plan shall be determined by the Committee (or its appropriately designated
delegate) in its sole discretion.
4. PLAN ADMINISTRATION: The Plan shall be administered by the Committee.
All decisions of the Committee shall be binding and conclusive on the
Participants. The Committee, on behalf of the Participants, shall enforce this
Plan in accordance with its terms and shall have all powers necessary for the
accomplishment of that purpose, including, but not by way of limitation, the
following powers:
<PAGE>
(a) To select the Participants;
(b) To interpret, construe, approve and adjust all terms, provisions,
conditions and limitations of this Plan;
(c) To decide any questions arising as to the interpretation or
application of any provision of the Plan;
(d) To prescribe forms and procedures to be followed by Employees for
participation in the Plan, or for other occurrences in the administration
of the Plan;
(e) To establish the terms and conditions of any Agreement under which
an Award may be earned and paid; and
(f) In addition to all other powers granted herein, the Committee
shall make and enforce such rules and regulations for the administration of
the Plan as are not inconsistent with the terms set forth herein.
No member of the Committee or officer of the Company to whom the
Committee has delegated authority in accordance with the provisions of Section 5
of this Plan shall be liable for anything done or omitted to be done by him, by
any member of the Committee or by any officer of the Company in connection with
the performance of any duties under this Plan, except for his own willful
misconduct or as expressly provided by statute.
5. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY: The Committee may delegate to the Chief
Executive Officer and to other senior officers of the Company its duties under
this Plan (including, but not limited to, its authority to select Participants)
pursuant to such conditions or limitations as the Committee may establish.
6. AWARDS: The Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of
Awards to be made under this Plan and shall designate from time to time the
individuals who are to be the recipients of Awards. Awards may also be made in
combination or in tandem with, in replacement of, or as alternative to, grants
or rights under this Plan or any other employee plan of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries, including the plan of any acquired entity. An Award may
provide for the grant or issuance of additional, replacement or alternative
Awards upon the occurrence of specified events. All or part of an Award may be
subject to conditions established by the Committee, which may include, but are
not limited to, continuous service with the Company and its Subsidiaries,
achievement of specific individual and/or business objectives, increases in
specified indices, attainment of specified growth rates and other comparable
measurements of performance. Unless specified otherwise by the Committee, the
amount payable pursuant to an Award shall be based on a percentage of the
Participant's Compensation.
An Award may be in the form of a Performance Award. A Performance
Award shall be paid, vested or otherwise deliverable solely on account of the
attainment of one or more pre-established, objective Performance Goals
established by the Committee prior to the earlier to occur of (x) 90 days after
the commencement of such period of service to which the Performance Goal relates
and (y) the lapse of 25% of such period of service (as scheduled in good faith
at the time the goal is established), and in any event while the outcome is
substantially uncertain. A Performance Goal is objective if a third party
having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether the goal is met.
Such a Performance Goal may be based on one or more business criteria that apply
to the individual, one or more business units of the Company, or the Company as
a whole. On and after January 1, 2000, Performance Goals shall be based upon
targets established by the Committee with respect to one or more of the
following financial factors, as applied to the Company or a business unit, as
applicable: earnings per share, earnings per share growth, total shareholder
return, economic value added, cash return on capitalization, increased revenue,
revenue ratios (per employee or per customer), net income, stock price, market
share, return on equity, return on assets, return on capital, return on capital
compared to cost of capital, shareholder value, net cash flow, operating income,
earnings before interest and taxes, cash flow, cash flow from operations, cost
reductions, cost ratios (per employee or per customer), proceeds from
dispositions, project completion time and budget goals, net cash flow before
financing activities, customer growth and total market value. Unless otherwise
stated, a Performance Goal need not be based upon an increase or positive result
<PAGE>
under a particular business criterion and could include, for example,
maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses (measured, in each case,
by reference to specific business criteria), and may also be based on
performance relative to the S&P 500 Electric Utilities Panel or other designated
peer group. Prior to the payment of any compensation based on the achievement
of Performance Goals, the Committee must certify in writing that applicable
Performance Goals and any of the material terms thereof were, in fact,
satisfied. The Committee in its sole discretion may decrease the amount payable
pursuant to a Performance Award, but in no event shall the Committee have
discretion to increase the amount payable pursuant to a Performance Award in a
manner inconsistent with the requirements for qualified performance-based
compensation under Code Section 162(m). In interpreting Plan provisions
applicable to Performance Goals and Performance Awards, it is the intent of the
Plan to conform with the standards of Code Section 162(m) applicable to
qualified performance-based compensation, and the Committee in establishing such
Performance Goals and interpreting the Plan shall be guided by such provisions.
Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and limitations
applicable to any Performance Awards pursuant to this Plan shall be determined
by the Committee. No Participant may be granted Performance Awards which will
result in the payment of more than $3,500,000 per Plan Year. Any Performance
Awards for the 2000 Plan Year shall be subject to the approval by the Company's
stockholders of the material terms of such Performance Awards at the Company's
2000 annual meeting in accordance with the requirements for qualified
performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m).
7. PAYMENT OF AWARDS: The Committee has sole and absolute authority and
discretion to determine the time and manner in which Awards, if any, shall be
paid under this Plan. Generally, however, the following provisions may apply:
(a) FORM OF PAYMENT: Payment of Awards shall be made in cash and may
be subject to such restrictions as the Committee shall determine.
(b) DATE OF PAYMENT: Payment of Awards shall be made as soon as
practicable (as determined by the Committee) following the close of the
Plan Year (the "Payment Date"), unless otherwise provided in Section 7(c).
(c) EMPLOYMENT REQUIRED: Except as provided below, Participants must
be Employees on the Payment Date in order to receive payment of an Award.
(1) Retirement, Death or Disability: If, prior to the Payment
Date, a Participant retires on his Retirement Date as defined in the
Retirement Plan, dies or terminates employment under circumstances
establishing eligibility for disability benefits under the Company's
long-term disability plan, then the Participant shall nonetheless
receive payment of the Award the Participant would have received had
the goals with respect to the Participant's Award been met at the
target level based on his Compensation earned prior to the
Participant's date of retirement, death or disability. Payments under
this Section 7(c)(1) shall be made as soon as practicable following
the date of the Participant's retirement, death or disability, but no
later than 30 days after the date of the Participant's retirement,
death or disability.
(2) Termination After Last Day of the Plan Year: If a Participant
is an Employee on the last day of the Plan Year and was employed at
least 90 days during the Plan Year, but is not an Employee on the
Payment Date, then the Participant may receive on the Payment Date, an
Award (if any) upon management's recommendation and approval by the
Committee.
(3) Employment for Less Than Entire Plan Year: For the 1999 Plan
Year, if a Participant is employed for at least 90 days during the
Plan Year (but not the entire Plan Year), and is employed on the
Payment Date, is employed on the last day of the Plan Year as provided
in Section 7(c)(2), or is terminated due to retirement, death or
disability as provided in Section 7(c)(1), then the Award payable
shall be prorated based on the number of days the Participant was
employed in the Plan Year.
<PAGE>
8. ASSIGNABILITY: Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and
provided in the Agreement, no Award or any other benefit under this Plan shall
be assignable or otherwise transferable, except by will or the laws of descent
and distribution. Any attempted assignment of an Award or any other benefit
under this Plan in violation of this Section 8 shall be null and void.
9. TAX WITHHOLDING: The Company shall have the right to withhold
applicable taxes from any Award payment and to take such other action as may be
necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for
withholding of such taxes.
10. FINALITY OF DETERMINATIONS: Any determination by the Committee in
carrying out or administering this Plan shall be final and binding for all
purposes and upon all interested persons and their heirs, successors, and
personal representatives.
11. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UNDER THE PLAN: No Employee or other person shall
have any claim or right to be granted an Award under this Plan. Neither the
Plan nor any action taken thereunder shall be construed as giving an Employee
any right to be retained in the employ of the Company or an Employer. No
Participant shall have any lien on any assets of the Company or an Employer by
reason of any Award made under this Plan.
12. AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION: The Board may
amend, modify, suspend or terminate this Plan for the purpose of meeting or
addressing any changes in legal requirements or for any other purpose permitted
by law, except that (i) no amendment or alteration that would adversely affect
the rights of any Participant under any Award previously granted to such
Participant shall be made without the consent of such Participant and (ii) no
amendment or alteration shall be effective prior to its approval by the
stockholders of the Company; however clause (ii) shall only apply if, and to the
extent, such approval is required by applicable legal requirements.
13. OTHER PLANS: The Award payments under this Plan shall be considered
compensation under the Retirement Plan and the Savings Plan.
14. GOVERNING LAW: This Plan and all determinations made and actions
taken pursuant hereto, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Texas.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Plan this _____ day
of ___________________, 2000, but effective as of January 1, 1999.
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
By
----------------------------------------
R. S. Letbetter
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ATTEST:
<PAGE>
CORRECTION FOR THE
SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH
SHOWN ON PAGE 17
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the
cumulative total shareholder return on the Common Stock with the cumulative
total return of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Electric Companies Index for the
period commencing January 1, 1995 and ending December 31, 1999.
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED, S&P 500 INDEX AND
THE S&P ELECTRIC COMPANIES INDEX
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 (1) (2)
[INSERT GRAPH HERE]
December 31,
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Reliant Energy, Incorporated $ 100 $ 146 $ 146 $ 185 $ 233 $ 176
S&P Electric Companies Index $ 100 $ 131 $ 131 $ 165 $ 191 $ 154
S&P 500 Index $ 100 $ 138 $ 169 $ 226 $ 290 $ 351
(1) Assumes that the value of the investment in the Common Stock and each index
was $100 on December 31, 1994 and that all dividends were reinvested.
(2) Historical stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future
price performance.
<PAGE>
[RELIANT ENERGY LOGO]
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
APPENDIX A
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information................ 1
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations of the Company............................... 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk................ 25
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of the Company................ 29
Statements of Consolidated Income......................................... 29
Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income........................... 30
Consolidated Balance Sheets............................................... 31
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows..................................... 32
Statements of Consolidated Stockholders' Equity........................... 33
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................ 34
Independent Auditor's Report.............................................. 76
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
1999 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
This Appendix A is derived from Item 7 (Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company), Item 7A
(Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk) and Item 8
(Financial Statements and Supplementary Data) of the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Reliant Energy Incorporated (Reliant Energy) and its subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company) for the year ended December 31, 1999 (Form 10-K). A
copy of the Form 10-K may be obtained without charge by contacting the Investor
Relations department of Reliant Energy at 1111 Louisiana, Houston, Texas 77002.
Reference is made to the 10-K for additional information about the business and
operations of the Company.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
From time to time, Reliant Energy makes statements concerning its
expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or
performance and underlying assumptions and other statements which are not
historical facts. These statements are "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although
Reliant Energy believes that the expectations and the underlying assumptions
reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you
that these expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements
involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ
materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.
The following are among the important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:
. state and federal legislative or regulatory developments
. national or regional economic conditions
. industrial, commercial and residential growth in service territories of
Reliant Energy and its subsidiaries
. the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and interest rates
. weather variations and other natural phenomena
. growth in opportunities for Reliant Energy's diversified operations
. the results of financing efforts
. the ability to consummate and timing of consummation of pending
acquisitions and dispositions
. the speed, degree and effect of continued electric industry
restructuring in North America and Western Europe, and
. risks incidental to Reliant Energy's and its subsidiaries' overseas
operations, including the effects of fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates
For a discussion of some additional factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking
statements, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations of the Company -- Certain Factors Affecting Future
Earnings of the Company." Any forward-looking statements should be considered in
light of these important factors and in conjunction with the other documents
filed by Reliant Energy with the SEC.
1
<PAGE>
New factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
described in forward-looking statements may emerge from time to time. It is not
possible for Reliant Energy to predict all of these factors, or the extent to
which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ
from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which the statement is made and Reliant
Energy does not undertake any obligation to update the information contained in
the statement to reflect subsequent developments or information.
The following sections contain forward-looking statements which you can
identify by the words "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "goal,"
"objective," "projection" or other similar words:
. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations of the Company --
. Results of Operation by Business Segment --
Wholesale Energy
Reliant Energy Europe
Reliant Energy Latin America
. Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company --
Competition and Restructuring of the Texas Electric Utility
Industry
Competition -- Reliant Energy Europe Operations
Competition -- Other Operations
Impact of the Year 2000 Issue and Other System Implementation
Issues
Entry into the European Market
Risk of Operations in Emerging Markets
Environmental Expenditures
. Liquidity and Capital Resources --
Company Consolidated Capital Requirements
Future Sources and Uses of Cash Flows
. New Accounting Issues
. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
2
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY
The following discussion and analysis should be read in combination with the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
The Company is a diversified international energy services company that
provides energy and energy services in North America, Western Europe and Latin
America. It operates one of the nation's largest electric utilities in terms of
kilowatt-hour (KWH) sales, and its three natural gas distribution divisions
together form the nation's third largest natural gas distribution operation in
terms of customers served. The Company invests in international and domestic
electric utility privatizations, gas distribution projects and the development
of non-rate regulated power generation projects. The Company is also an
interstate natural gas pipeline, providing gas transportation, supply, gathering
and storage, and also engages in wholesale energy marketing and trading.
The Company's financial reporting segments include: Electric Operations,
Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate Pipelines, Wholesale Energy, Reliant Energy
Europe, Reliant Energy Latin America and Corporate. For segment reporting
information, see Notes 1(a) and 18 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements. For a description of the segments, see Note 1(a) to the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 1999, the Company completed the first two phases of its acquisition of
N.V. UNA (UNA), a Dutch power generation company. The Company acquired 40% and
12% of UNA's capital stock on October 7, 1999 and December 1, 1999,
respectively. On March 1, 2000, the Company purchased the remaining 48% of the
shares of UNA. The total purchase price of the acquisition was approximately
$2.4 billion (based on an exchange rate of 2.0565 NLG per U.S. dollar as of
October 7, 1999), which includes a $426 million promissory note to UNA. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Effective October 1, 1999, the
Company recorded 100% of the operating results of UNA. For additional
information about this acquisition, including the Company's accounting treatment
of the acquisition, see Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In August 1997, the Company acquired Reliant Energy Resources Corp. (Resources
Corp.) and its subsidiaries (collectively, Resources), a natural gas gathering,
transmission, marketing and distribution company that conducted business under
the name "NorAm Energy Corp." prior to February 1999. The acquisition was
accounted for as a purchase; accordingly, the Company's results of operations
include the results of operations of Resources only for the period after the
acquisition date.
To enhance comparability between reporting periods, certain information is
presented on a pro forma basis and reflects the acquisition of Resources as if
it had occurred at the beginning of 1997 and the acquisition of UNA as if it had
occurred at the beginning of 1999 and 1998. Pro forma purchase-related
adjustments for these acquisitions include amortization of goodwill and the
allocation of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities. In addition,
pro forma adjustments have been made to reflect UNA's operating results in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The pro forma
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the combined results of
operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions occurred on such dates.
All dollar amounts in the tables that follow are in millions, except for per
share data.
3
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTUAL
----------------------------------------------------------------
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues.................................................... $ 15,303 $ 11,488 $ 6,878
Operating Expenses.......................................... (14,062) (10,022) (5,823)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Operating Income............................................ 1,241 1,466 1,055
Dividend Income............................................. 26 41 41
Interest Expense and Other Charges.......................... (563) (539) (424)
Unrealized Gain on Time Warner Investment................... 2,452
Unrealized Loss on Indexed Debt Securities.................. (630) (1,176) (121)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit................................ (899) 30 (206)
Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax.............................. (183)
Other Income - Net.......................................... 38 37 76
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders....... $ 1,482 $ (141) $ 421
================== ================== ==================
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share............................. $5.20 $ (0.50) $ 1.66
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share........................... $5.18 $ (0.50) $ 1.66
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRO FORMA
----------------------------------------------------------------
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues.................................................... $ 15,784 $ 12,320 $10,191
Operating Expenses.......................................... (14,436) (10,681) (8,985)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Operating Income............................................ 1,348 1,639 1,206
Dividend Income............................................. 26 41 41
Interest Expense and Other Charges.......................... (640) (647) (533)
Unrealized Gain on Time Warner Investment................... 2,452
Unrealized Loss on Indexed Debt Securities.................. (630) (1,176) (121)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit................................ (904) 24 (232)
Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax.............................. (183)
Other Income - Net.......................................... 56 58 76
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders....... $ 1,525 $ (61) $ 437
================== ================== ==================
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share............................. $5.35 $ (0.21) $ 1.55
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share........................... $5.33 $ (0.21) $ 1.55
</TABLE>
1999 (Actual) Compared to 1998 (Actual). The Company reported consolidated
earnings in 1999 of $1.482 billion ($5.20 per basic share) compared to a
consolidated net loss of $141 million ($0.50 per share) for 1998. The amount
for 1999 reflects a $1.575 billion (after-tax) non-cash, unrealized accounting
gain on the Company's investment in Time Warner (TW) common stock (TW Common);
a $409 million (after-tax) non-cash, unrealized accounting loss on indexed debt
securities; a $102 million (after-tax) loss resulting from the effect of the
devaluation of the Brazilian real on equity earnings of the Company's Brazilian
investments; and a $183 million (after-tax) extraordinary loss relating to an
accounting impairment of certain generation related regulatory assets of
Electric Operations. The reported loss for 1998 includes a $764 million (after-
tax) non-cash, unrealized accounting loss on indexed debt securities. For
information regarding the Company's investment in TW Common and Reliant Energy's
indexed debt securities, see Note 8 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements. For information regarding the $183 million extraordinary loss, see
"-- Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company -- Competition and
Restructuring of the Texas Electric Utility Industry" and Note 3 to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
After adjusting for unusual and other charges (as described above) in both
years, net income for 1999 would have been $601 million ($2.11 per share)
compared to $623 million ($2.19 per share) for 1998. The $22 million decrease
4
<PAGE>
was primarily due to an $80 million, or $0.28 per share, gain on the sale of an
Argentine electric distribution system in 1998 and lower earnings in 1999 for
the Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate Pipelines and Wholesale Energy
segments. These decreases were partially offset by higher earnings in the
Reliant Energy Latin America segment (after adjusting for the loss due to the
devaluation of the Brazilian real) and earnings of Reliant Energy Europe which
acquired UNA in the fourth quarter of 1999 (see Note 2 to the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements).
1999 (Pro Forma) Compared to 1998 (Pro Forma). Consolidated pro forma
earnings in 1999 were $1.525 billion ($5.35 per basic share) compared to a
consolidated pro forma net loss of $61 million ($0.21 per share) for 1998.
After adjusting for unusual and other charges (as described above) in both
years, pro forma net income for 1999 would have been $644 million ($2.26 per
share) compared to $703 million ($2.48 per share) for 1998. The decrease in the
1999 period can be attributed to the same factors discussed above and a decline
in pro forma operating income of Reliant Energy Europe.
1998 (Actual) Compared to 1997 (Actual). The Company reported a consolidated
net loss for 1998 of $141 million ($0.50 per share) compared to consolidated
net income of $421 million ($1.66 per share) in 1997. The 1998 consolidated
net loss resulted from the accounting treatment of Reliant Energy's indexed
debt securities, one series of which was issued in July 1997. The Company
recorded a non-cash, unrealized accounting loss (after-tax) of $764 million
on such series of indexed debt securities in 1998. In 1997, the Company
recorded a non-cash, unrealized accounting loss (after-tax) of $79 million on
such series of indexed debt securities, which was partially offset by $37
million of non-recurring interest income related to a refund of federal income
taxes in 1997. For a discussion of Reliant Energy's indexed debt securities,
see Note 8 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
After adjusting for unusual and other charges (as described above) in both
years, net income for 1998 would have been $623 million ($2.19 per share)
compared to $463 million ($1.83 per share) in 1997. The $160 million increase
in adjusted net income for 1998 compared to 1997 was due to improved results
from Interstate Pipelines, Wholesale Energy and Reliant Energy Latin America
segments. Net income for 1998 included an $80 million, or $0.28 per share, gain
on the sale of an investment in an electric distribution system in Argentina.
Also contributing to the increase were earnings from the businesses acquired in
the acquisition of Resources. These effects were partially offset by additional
depreciation of regulated power generation assets in compliance with Reliant
Energy HL&P's rate of return cap, as described below, and increased interest
expense primarily related to the acquisition of Resources.
1998 (Pro Forma) Compared to 1997 (Pro Forma). The consolidated pro forma net
loss for 1998 was $61 million ($0.21 per share) compared to consolidated pro
forma net income of $437 million ($1.55 per share) in 1997. After adjusting for
unusual and other charges (as described above) in both years, pro forma net
income for 1998 would have been $703 million ($2.48 per share) compared to
$479 million ($1.70 per share) in 1997. This increase in adjusted pro forma net
income for 1998 compared to 1997 was primarily due to the same factors discussed
above and $80 million of pro forma net income of UNA in 1998.
Interest Expense and Other Charges. In 1999, 1998 and 1997, interest expense
and other charges were $563 million, $539 million and $424 million,
respectively. Increased interest expense and other charges in 1999 compared to
1998 was primarily due to higher levels of short-term borrowings, long-term debt
and trust preferred securities. These increases were associated in part with
the acquisition of shares of UNA in the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company's
additional investment in TW Common in 1999, other acquisitions of businesses and
capital expenditures. The increase in 1999 was partially offset by a decrease in
the average interest rate for long-term debt. The increase in 1998 from 1997 was
primarily attributable to the acquisition of Resources in August 1997 and the
acquisitions of non-rate regulated electric power plants and equity investments
in Latin America in 1998.
Income Tax Expense. The effective tax rate for 1999, 1998, and 1997 was
35.1%, 17.7%, and 32.8%, respectively. After adjusting for the following unusual
and other charges: unrealized accounting gain on the investment in TW Common,
unrealized accounting loss on indexed debt securities, loss due to the
devaluation of the Brazilian real, and non-recurring interest income related to
a refund of federal income taxes in 1997, the adjusted effective tax rate for
1999, 1998, and 1997 was 33.0%, 37.9% and 33.1%, respectively. The decrease in
effective tax rate in 1999 compared
5
<PAGE>
to 1998 was primarily due to the discontinuance of SFAS No. 71, "Accounting for
the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation" (SFAS No. 71), for the generation
operations of Electric Operations. For information regarding the discontinuance
of SFAS No. 71 to the generation operations of Electric Operations, see Note 3
to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The increase in effective
tax rate in 1998 from 1997 was primarily due to non-deductible goodwill
resulting from the acquisition of Resources in August 1997.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
All business segment data (other than data relating to Electric Operations) is
presented on a pro forma basis and reflects the acquisition of Resources as if
it had occurred at the beginning of 1997 and the acquisition of UNA as if it had
occurred at the beginning of 1999 and 1998.
The following table presents operating income on an actual basis and a pro
forma basis for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 (in millions).
Certain amounts from the previous years have been reclassified to conform to the
1999 presentation of the financial statements. Such reclassifications do not
affect consolidated earnings.
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTUAL PRO FORMA
------------------------------- ------------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------- ------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1999 1998 1997
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Electric Operations........... $ 981 $1,002 $ 985 $ 981 $1,002 $ 985
Natural Gas Distribution...... 125 145 57 125 145 156
Interstate Pipelines.......... 113 128 32 113 128 99
Wholesale Energy.............. 45 59 1 45 59 (15)
Reliant Energy Europe......... 32 139 173
Reliant Energy Latin America.. (23) 182 20 (23) 182 17
Corporate..................... (32) (50) (40) (32) (50) (36)
------ ------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Total Consolidated............ $1,241 $1,466 $1,055 $1,348 1,639 $1 ,206
====== ====== ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
ELECTRIC OPERATIONS
Electric Operations conducts operations under the name "Reliant Energy HL&P,"
an unincorporated division of Reliant Energy. Electric Operations generates,
purchases, transmits and distributes electricity to approximately 1.7 million
customers in a 5,000 square mile area on the Texas Gulf Coast, including
Houston, Texas, the nation's fourth largest city.
In June 1999, the Texas legislature adopted the Texas Electric Choice Plan
(Legislation) that substantially amends the regulatory structure governing
electric utilities in Texas in order to allow retail competition beginning on
January 1, 2002. Prior to adoption of the Legislation, Electric Operations'
earnings were capped at an agreed overall rate of return formula on a calendar
year basis as part of the transition to competition plan (Transition Plan)
approved by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (Texas Utility Commission)
effective January 1, 1998. As a result of the Transition Plan, any earnings
prior to the Legislation above the maximum allowed return cap on invested
capital were offset by additional depreciation of Electric Operations' electric
generation assets. The Transition Plan also approved the implementation of base
rate credits to residential customers of 4% in 1998 and an additional 2% in
1999. Commercial customers whose monthly billing is 1000 kva or less received
base rate credits of 2% in 1998 and 1999. For more information regarding the
Transition Plan, see Notes 1(g) and 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements. For more information regarding the Legislation, see Note 3 to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
<PAGE>
The following table provides summary data regarding the actual results of
operations of Electric Operations for 1999, 1998 and 1997 (in millions):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------ ------ ------
Operating Revenues:
Base Revenues(1)............................ $2,968 $2,969 $2,839
Reconcilable Fuel Revenues(2)............... 1,515 1,381 1,413
------ ------ ------
Total Operating Revenues................ 4,483 4,350 4,252
------ ------ ------
Operating Expenses:
Fuel and Purchased Power.................... 1,569 1,455 1,477
Operation and Maintenance................... 916 890 885
Depreciation and Amortization Expense....... 667 663 582
Other Operating Expenses.................... 350 340 323
------ ------ ------
Total Operating Expenses................ 3,502 3,348 3,267
------ ------ ------
Operating Income............................... $ 981 $1,002 $ 985
====== ====== ------
________
(1) Includes miscellaneous revenues, certain non-reconcilable fuel revenues and
certain purchased power-related revenues.
(2) Includes revenues collected through a fixed fuel factor and surcharges net
of adjustments for over/under recovery of fuel. See "--Operating Revenues
--Electric Operations."
OPERATING INCOME -- ELECTRIC OPERATIONS
1999 Compared to 1998. Electric Operations' operating income for the year
ended December 31, 1999 was $981 million compared to $1,002 million for the same
period in 1998. The $21 million decrease was primarily due to the effects of
milder weather and additional base rate credits provided under the Transition
Plan partially offset by continued strong customer growth.
1998 Compared to 1997. Electric Operations' 1998 operating income was $1,002
million compared to $985 million the previous year. The increase of $17 million
in operating income was due to higher revenues from the unusually hot weather in
1998 and customer growth partially offset by base rate credits provided under
the Transition Plan.
OPERATING REVENUES -- ELECTRIC OPERATIONS
1999 Compared to 1998. Electric Operations' base revenues were $2,968 million
for 1999, a decrease of $1 million from 1998. The effects of milder weather in
1999 as compared to 1998 and additional base rate credits in 1999 were offset by
continued strong customer growth and increased usage per customer. Total KWH
sales were consistent between the two periods.
Electric Operations' 10% increase in reconcilable fuel revenue in 1999
resulted primarily from increased natural gas prices. The Texas Utility
Commission provides for recovery of certain fuel and purchased power costs
through a fixed fuel factor included in electric rates. Revenues collected
through such factor are adjusted monthly to equal expenses; therefore, such
revenues and expenses have no effect on earnings unless fuel costs are
determined not to be recoverable. The adjusted over/under recovery of fuel costs
is recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as deferred credits or
regulatory assets, respectively. Electric Operations filed a fuel
reconciliation proceeding with the Texas Utility Commission on January 30, 1998
covering $3.5 billion of fuel costs for the three year period ending July 31,
1997. In December 1998, the Texas Utility Commission issued a final order that
allowed Electric Operations to recover eligible fuel costs for the three-year
period ending July 31, 1997, with some exceptions including a disallowance of
$12 million in fuel expense relating to the three-year period ending July 31,
1997.
7
<PAGE>
1998 Compared to 1997. Electric Operations' $130 million increase in 1998
base revenues over 1997 was primarily the result of unusually hot weather and
the impact of customer growth, net of base rate credits implemented under the
Transition Plan. In 1998, Electric Operations implemented a base rate credit
which reduced revenues by $74 million. Growth in usage and number of customers
contributed an additional $48 million in base revenues in 1998.
Electric Operations' 2% decrease in reconcilable fuel revenue in 1998 resulted
primarily from decreased natural gas prices. The decrease in natural gas prices,
however, was largely offset by increased KWH sales resulting from hotter weather
in 1998.
FUEL AND PURCHASED POWER EXPENSE--ELECTRIC OPERATIONS
Fuel costs constitute the single largest expense for Electric Operations. The
mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is determined primarily by
system load and the unit cost of fuel consumed. The average cost of fuel used
by Electric Operations in 1999 was $1.87 per million British Thermal Units
(MMBtu) ($2.47 for natural gas, $1.76 for coal, $1.42 for lignite, and $0.44 for
nuclear). The average cost of fuel used by Electric Operations in 1998 was $1.70
per MMBtu ($2.18 for natural gas, $1.78 for coal, $1.19 for lignite, and $0.48
for nuclear). The average cost of fuel used by Electric Operations in 1997 was
$1.87 per MMBtu ($2.60 for natural gas, $2.02 for coal, $1.08 for lignite and
$0.54 for nuclear).
1999 Compared to 1998. Fuel and purchased power expenses in 1999 increased by
$114 million or 8% over 1998 expenses. The increase is a result of higher costs
for natural gas and higher reconcilable cost per unit of lignite. The increase
resulting from higher unit cost of fuel was partially offset by a $12 million
charge to non-reconcilable fuel in 1998 as discussed above.
1998 Compared to 1997. Fuel and purchased power expenses in 1998 decreased by
$22 million or 1% below 1997 expenses. The decrease was driven by a decrease in
the average unit cost of natural gas.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES, DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION AND OTHER--
ELECTRIC OPERATIONS
1999 Compared to 1998. Operation, maintenance and other operating expenses
increased $36 million in 1999, including $38 million due to transmission tariffs
within ERCOT. A portion of these transmission expenses were offset by an
increase of $28 million in transmission tariff revenue. State franchise taxes
increased $13 million in 1999 compared to 1998.
1998 Compared to 1997. Operation, maintenance and other operating expenses
increased $22 million in 1998 compared to 1997, including $9 million due to
transmission tariffs within ERCOT. These transmission expenses were largely
offset by an increase of $7 million in transmission tariff revenue. Franchise
fees paid to cities increased $11 million due to increased sales in 1998.
In 1998, the Company recorded additional depreciation expense for Electric
Operations of $194 million, which is $144 million more than recorded during
1997, as provided by the Transition Plan. The comparative increase was
mitigated because amortization of the investment in lignite reserves associated
with a canceled generation project was $62 million lower in 1998 than in 1997.
For information regarding the depreciation and amortization expense of Electric
Operations recorded in 1999 and 1998 pursuant to the Legislation and Transition
Plan, see Notes 1(d), 1(g), 3 and 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION
Natural Gas Distribution conducts operations through three divisions of
Resources Corp., Reliant Energy Arkla, Reliant Energy Entex and Reliant Energy
Minnegasco. Natural Gas Distribution's operations consist of intrastate natural
gas sales to, and natural gas transportation for residential, commercial and
industrial customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma
and Texas.
8
<PAGE>
The Company has retained a financial advisor to assist it in evaluating
strategic alternatives for Reliant Energy Arkla and Reliant Energy Minnegasco,
including divestiture.
The following table provides summary data regarding the actual results of
operations of Natural Gas Distribution for 1999 and 1998 and unaudited pro forma
results of operations for 1997 (in millions):
ACTUAL PRO FORMA
--------------- ------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
--------------- ------------
1999 1998 1997
------ ------ ------------
Operating Revenues:
Base Revenues.................................... $ 802 $ 845 $ 874
Recovered Gas Revenues........................... 1,095 1,034 1,388
------ ------ ------------
Total Operating Revenues........................ 1,897 1,879 2,262
------ ------ ------------
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas...................................... 1,102 1,085 1,440
Operation and Maintenance........................ 453 426 439
Depreciation and Amortization.................... 132 131 125
Other Operating Expenses......................... 85 92 102
------ ------ ------------
Total Operating Expenses........................ 1,772 1,734 2,106
------ ------ ------------
Operating Income.................................. $ 125 $ 145 $ 156
====== ====== ============
Throughput Data (in billion cubic feet (BCF)):
Residential and Commercial Sales................. 287 286 326
Industrial Sales................................. 56 56 59
Transportation................................... 46 44 42
------ ------ ------------
Total Throughput................................ 389 386 427
====== ====== ============
1999 (Actual) Compared to 1998 (Actual). Natural Gas Distribution's operating
income was $125 million in 1999 compared to $145 million in 1998. The $20
million decrease was primarily attributable to an increase in operating
expenses, in particular employee benefits, and costs associated with the
implementation of an enterprise wide information system.
The $18 million or 1% increase in 1999 operating revenues compared to 1998 is
primarily due to an increase in the price of purchased gas. Mild weather in
1999 continued to negatively impact the demand for natural gas heating.
1998 (Actual) Compared to 1997 (Pro Forma). Operating income was $145 million
in 1998 compared to pro forma operating income of $156 million in 1997. The $11
million decrease reflects the lower demand for natural gas heating that resulted
from milder weather in 1998. The negative impact of weather was partially offset
by (i) the favorable impact of purchased gas adjustments during this period on
Reliant Energy Arkla's operating income, (ii) lower operating expenses and
(iii) increased revenue resulting from Reliant Energy Minnegasco's performance
based rate plan.
The $383 million decrease in 1998 actual operating revenues compared to 1997
pro forma operating revenues is primarily attributable to a decrease in the
price of purchased gas and decreased sales volume primarily due to milder
weather in 1998.
INTERSTATE PIPELINES
Interstate Pipelines provides interstate gas transportation and related
services through two wholly owned subsidiaries of Resources Corp., Reliant
Energy Gas Transmission Company (REGT) and Mississippi River Transmission
Corporation (MRT).
9
<PAGE>
The Company has retained a financial advisor to assist it in evaluating
strategic alternatives for Interstate Pipelines, including divestiture.
The following table provides summary data regarding the actual results of
operations of Interstate Pipelines for 1999 and 1998 and unaudited pro forma
results of operations for 1997 (in millions):
ACTUAL PRO FORMA
--------------------- ------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
--------------------- ------------
1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- ------------
Operating Revenues....................... $ 275 $ 282 $ 295
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas............................. 27 32 51
Operation and Maintenance............... 71 64 82
Depreciation and Amortization........... 49 44 48
Other Operating Expenses................ 15 14 15
--------- --------- ------------
Total Operating Expenses............... 162 154 196
--------- --------- ------------
Operating Income......................... $ 113 $ 128 $ 99
========= ========= ============
Throughput Data (in BCF):
Natural Gas Sales........................ 15 16 18
Transportation........................... 836 825 911
Elimination(1).......................... (14) (15) (17)
--------- --------- ------------
Total Throughput......................... 837 826 912
========= ========= ============
_______
(1) Elimination of volumes both transported and sold.
1999 (Actual) Compared to 1998 (Actual). Interstate Pipelines' operating
income for 1999 was $113 million compared to $128 million for 1998. The $15
million decrease was due primarily to the settlement of a dispute related to
certain gas purchase contracts that resulted in the recognition of $6 million of
revenues in 1998, a reduction in depreciation and amortization in 1998 of $5
million related to a rate case settlement and an increase in operating expenses
in 1999, primarily employee benefit expenses.
Operating revenue for Interstate Pipelines decreased by $7 million in 1999
compared to 1998. The decrease was primarily attributable to the settlement of
outstanding gas purchase contract litigation in 1998 as discussed above. Natural
gas expense decreased $5 million in 1999 compared to 1998 primarily due to
expiration of gas supply contracts. Operation and maintenance expense increased
$7 million in 1999 as compared to 1998 primarily due to increases in employee
benefit expenses. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $5 million in
1999 due to a rate settlement recorded in 1998 as discussed above. The rate
settlement, effective January 1998, provided for a $5 million reduction in MRT's
depreciation rates retroactive to July 1996.
1998 (Actual) Compared to 1997 (Pro Forma). Interstate Pipelines' operating
income for 1998 was $128 million compared to $99 million for 1997 on a pro forma
basis. The $29 million increase in operating income for 1998 is primarily due
to $11 million of pre-tax, non-recurring items recorded in 1998 for favorable
litigation and rate case settlements as discussed above. The increase in
operating income also reflects improved operating margins and reductions in
operating expenses. The increase in operating income for 1998 was partially
offset by $7 million of non-recurring transportation revenues recorded in the
first quarter of 1997, as discussed below.
Operating revenues for Interstate Pipelines decreased by $13 million in 1998
compared to pro forma 1997 revenues. The decrease in revenues is due in part to
$7 million of non-recurring transportation revenues recognized in the first
quarter of 1997. These revenues were recognized following a settlement with
Reliant Energy Arkla related to transportation service. The settlement with
Reliant Energy Arkla resulted in reduced transportation rates which also reduced
revenues for 1998. Lower spot prices in 1998 and reduced sales volumes also
contributed to the reduction in operating revenues. These decreases were
partially offset by the settlement of outstanding gas purchase contract
10
<PAGE>
litigation, which resulted in the recognition of approximately $6 million of
revenues in 1998 as discussed above. The 9% decline in total throughput
reflected the impact of unseasonably warm winter weather.
Interstate Pipelines' 1998 operating expenses declined $42 million in
comparison to 1997 pro forma operating expenses. Contributing to the decrease
were the MRT rate settlement in 1998, the impact of cost control initiatives and
reduced pension and benefit expenses.
Natural gas expense decreased $19 million in 1998 compared to pro forma
natural gas expense in 1997 primarily due to lower gas sales volumes and lower
prices for purchased gas. Operation and maintenance expense decreased $18
million in 1998 in comparison to pro forma operation and maintenance expense for
1997. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of cost control initiatives,
reduced pension and benefit expenses and decreased maintenance due to milder
weather in the first quarter of 1998. Depreciation expense decreased $4 million
in 1998 compared to pro forma depreciation expense in 1997 primarily due to a
rate settlement recorded in 1998.
During 1999 and 1998, Interstate Pipelines' largest unaffiliated customer was
a natural gas utility that serves the greater St. Louis metropolitan area in
Illinois and Missouri. Revenues from this customer are generated pursuant to
several long-term firm storage and transportation agreements that currently are
scheduled to expire at various dates between October 2000 and May 2001.
Interstate Pipelines is currently negotiating with the natural gas utility to
renew these agreements. If such contracts are not renewed, the results of
operations of Interstate Pipelines could be adversely affected.
WHOLESALE ENERGY
Wholesale Energy conducts its operations through (i) Reliant Energy Power
Generation, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, Power Generation),
(ii) Reliant Energy Services, Inc. (Reliant Energy Services) and (iii) Reliant
Energy Field Services, Inc.
The Company has retained a financial advisor to assist it in evaluating
strategic alternatives for Reliant Energy Field Services, Inc., including
divestiture.
Wholesale Energy includes the acquisition, development and operation of, and
sales of capacity, energy and ancillary services from domestic unregulated power
generation facilities; wholesale energy trading, marketing and risk management
activities in North America; and domestic natural gas gathering activities.
Power Generation acquires and develops non-rate regulated power generation
facilities. From March 1997 through December 31, 1999, the Company invested
approximately $611 million in the acquisition and development of domestic non-
rate regulated power generation projects. As of December 31, 1999, Power
Generation had entered into commitments associated with various domestic
generation projects amounting to $324 million along with commitments to acquire
various generating equipment totaling $318 million for delivery from 2000 to
2001 that are to be used in future development projects. In February 2000, Power
Generation signed a definitive agreement to purchase from Sithe Energies, Inc.
its non-rate regulated power generating assets and sites located in
Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland having a net generating capacity of more
than 4,200 megawatts for an aggregate purchase price of $2.1 billion, subject to
certain adjustments. The acquisition is expected to close in the second quarter
of 2000 and is subject to obtaining certain regulatory approvals and satisfying
other closing conditions. The Company expects that Power Generation will
actively pursue the acquisition of additional generation assets and the
development of additional new non-rate regulated generation projects. Depending
on the timing and success of Power Generation's future efforts, the Company
believes that resulting expenditures could be substantial.
To minimize the Company's risks associated with fluctuations in the price of
natural gas and transportation, the Company, primarily through Reliant Energy
Services, enters into futures transactions, swaps and options in order to hedge
against market price changes affecting (i) certain commitments to buy, sell and
move electric power, natural gas, crude oil and refined products, (ii) existing
natural gas storage and heating oil inventory, (iii) future power sales and
natural gas purchases by generation facilities, (iv) crude oil and refined
products and (v) certain anticipated transactions,
11
<PAGE>
some of which carry off-balance sheet risk. Reliant Energy Services also enters
into commodity and weather derivatives in its trading and price risk management
activities. For a discussion of the Company's accounting treatment of derivative
instruments, see Note 5 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and
"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."
The Company believes that energy trading, marketing and risk management
activities complement its strategy of developing and/or acquiring non-rate
regulated generation assets in key markets. Reliant Energy Services purchases
fuel to supply Power Generation's existing generation assets and sells
electricity produced by these assets. As a result, the Company has made, and
expects to continue to make, significant investments in developing Reliant
Energy Services' infrastructure including software, trading and risk control
resources.
The following table provides summary data regarding the actual results of
operations of Wholesale Energy for 1999 and 1998 and unaudited pro forma results
of operations for 1997 (in millions):
ACTUAL PRO FORMA
--------------------- ------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
--------------------- ------------
1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- ------------
Operating Revenues........................ $ 7,949 $ 4,456 $ 3,042
Operating Expenses:
Natural Gas.............................. 3,959 2,413 2,645
Purchased Power.......................... 3,729 1,829 313
Operation and Maintenance................ 184 132 90
Depreciation and Amortization............ 26 18 7
Other Operating Expenses................. 6 5 2
--------- --------- ------------
Total Operating Expenses.............. 7,904 4,397 3,057
--------- --------- ------------
Operating Income.......................... $ 45 $ 59 $ (15)
========= ========= ============
Operations Data:
Natural Gas (in BCF):
Sales................................... 1,820 1,164 958
Gathering............................... 270 237 242
--------- --------- ------------
Total................................. 2,090 1,401 1,200
========= ========= ============
Electricity (in MMWH):
Wholesale Power Sales................... 112.1 65.2 25.0
========= ========= ============
1999 (Actual) Compared to 1998 (Actual). Wholesale Energy reported operating
income of $45 million compared to $59 million for 1998. The $14 million
decrease was due primarily to a decline in market prices for electricity in the
California market caused by milder than normal weather and increased
hydroelectric generation sold into the California market by competitors. This
decline more than offset significant increases in operating income in the
trading and marketing operation of Wholesale Energy.
Operating revenues for Wholesale Energy were $7.9 billion in 1999, a 78%
increase from 1998. The increase in revenues was primarily due to increased
trading volumes for power, gas and oil, as well as higher sales prices for these
same commodities.
Natural gas and purchased power expense increased $3.4 billion in 1999, an 81%
increase from 1998. The increase was primarily due to the corresponding
increase in trading sales volumes. Trading and marketing margin percentages
remained consistent between the two periods. Operation and maintenance expenses
in 1999 increased $52 million from 1998. The increase was primarily due to
increased operating expenses for the California plants which were acquired in
May 1998, increased development costs, and higher levels of trading and
marketing staffing to support the higher sales and expanded marketing efforts.
Depreciation and amortization in 1999 increased $8 million from 1998 due
primarily to a full year of depreciation for the California plants as well as
additional assets placed into operation during 1999.
12
<PAGE>
1998 (Actual) Compared to 1997 (Pro Forma). Wholesale Energy reported
operating income of $59 million in 1998 compared to a pro forma loss of $15
million in 1997. This $74 million increase was due to improved operating
results of both non-rate regulated generating assets and trading and marketing
activities. Capitalization of previously expensed development costs related to
successful project starts in Nevada, California and Texas also contributed to
the increase. These improved results were partially offset by increased
operating expenses in the trading and marketing operations, as discussed below.
In 1997, operating income was negatively affected by hedging losses associated
with sales under peaking contracts and losses from the sale of unhedged natural
gas held in storage in the first quarter of 1997 totaling $17 million.
Operating revenues in 1998 increased $1.4 billion, a 46% increase from pro
forma 1997 operating revenues, due almost entirely to an increase in wholesale
power sales.
Operating expense in 1998 increased $1.3 billion, or 44% compared to pro forma
operating expense for 1997 primarily due to $1.5 billion in increased power
costs related to energy trading and marketing activities. Natural gas expenses
in 1998 decreased $232 million, or 9%, compared to pro forma 1997 due to the
reduction in the price of natural gas in 1998. Operation and maintenance expense
increased $42 million, or 47%, in 1998 as compared to 1997 primarily due to
power plant acquisitions in California and costs associated with staffing
increases in the trading and marketing operation to support increased sales and
marketing efforts. Also contributing to the increase was an increase in a
credit reserve due to increased counterparty credit and performance risk
associated with higher prices and higher volatility in the electric power market
recorded in the second quarter of 1998.
RELIANT ENERGY EUROPE
The Company established its Reliant Energy Europe business segment in the
fourth quarter of 1999. Reliant Energy Europe owns, operates and sells power
from generation facilities in the Netherlands and plans to participate in the
emerging wholesale energy trading and marketing industry in the Netherlands and
other countries in Europe.
During 1999, the Company completed the first two phases of its acquisition of
UNA, a Dutch power generation company. The Company acquired 40% and 12% of
UNA's capital stock on October 7, 1999 and December 1, 1999, respectively. On
March 1, 2000, the Company purchased the remaining 48% of the shares of UNA. The
total purchase price of the acquisition was approximately $2.4 billion (based on
an exchange rate of 2.0565 NLG per U.S. dollar as of October 7, 1999), which
includes a $426 million promissory note to UNA. The Reliant Energy Europe
segment includes the operations of UNA and its subsidiaries and the operations
of Reliant Energy Trading & Marketing B.V. (Reliant Energy Marketing Europe),
which operations commenced in the fourth quarter of 1999. For additional
information about this acquisition, including the Company's accounting treatment
of the acquisition, see Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The following table provides summary data for the unaudited pro forma results
of operations of Reliant Energy Europe for 1999 and 1998 (in millions):
PRO FORMA
YEAR ENDED
-----------------------
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1999 1998
--------- ---------
Operating Revenues............................. $ 634 $ 832
Operating Expenses:
Fuel and Purchased Power.................... 284 435
Operation and Maintenance................... 126 136
Depreciation and Amortization............... 85 88
Total Operating Expenses................ 495 659
--------- ---------
Operating Income............................... $ 139 $ 173
========= =========
13
<PAGE>
1999 (Pro Forma) to 1998 (Pro Forma). For the year ended December 31, 1999,
pro forma operating income was $139 million compared to pro forma operating
income of $173 million in 1998. The $34 million decrease in operating income
between periods was primarily due to reduced revenues resulting from lower
regulated returns and recovery of costs. Operating expenses in 1999 associated
with the start-up costs of the European trading and marketing operations also
contributed to the decline.
Pro forma revenues declined in 1999 from 1998 due to lower regulated returns
and recovery of costs and due to the effects of milder weather and competition
from cogeneration and increased import power from other countries, which reduced
the generation of electricity from UNA's plants. Pro forma fuel expenses
declined in 1999 from 1998 primarily due to reduced production of electricity,
as discussed above. Operation and maintenance expenses decreased due to cost
control initiatives and lower ongoing maintenance expenses.
UNA, the other large Dutch generating companies and the Dutch distribution
companies are currently operating under various agreements which regulate, among
other things, the rates UNA may charge for its generation output. Under the
Cooperative Agreement (OvS Agreement), UNA and the other generators agreed to
sell their generating output to a national production pool (SEP) and, in return,
receive a standardized remuneration. The remuneration includes fuel cost,
capital cost and the cost of operations and maintenance expenses. UNA operates
under the protocol (Protocol) which is an agreement under which the generators
agreed to provide capacity and energy to distributors for a total payment of NLG
3.4 billion (approximately $1.6 billion U.S. dollars) over the period 1997
through 2000 plus compensation of actual fuel costs. The OvS will expire
substantially by the beginning of 2001. The Protocol, which was entered into in
order to facilitate the transition from a regulated energy market into an
unregulated energy market, will also expire substantially by the beginning of
2001.
Beginning 2001, UNA will begin operating in a deregulated market. Based on
current estimates, Reliant Energy anticipates that UNA will undergo a
significant decline in revenues in 2001 attributable to the deregulation of the
market. Another factor that will affect the operating results of Reliant Energy
Europe is the imposition in 2002 of standard Dutch corporate tax rates of 35% on
UNA. In 1999 and prior years, UNA was not subject to a corporate income tax.
For additional information on these and certain other factors that may affect
the future results of operations of Reliant Energy Europe, see "--Certain
Factors Affecting Future Earnings of the Company--Competition--Reliant
Energy Europe Operations."
RELIANT ENERGY LATIN AMERICA
Reliant Energy Latin America includes the results of operations of Reliant
Energy International, Inc. (Reliant Energy International) and the international
operations of Resources (Resources International). Reliant Energy Latin America
participates in the privatization of generation and distribution facilities and
independent power projects primarily in Latin America.
Reliant Energy is evaluating selling the Company's Latin American assets in
order to pursue business opportunities that are in line with its strategies for
the U.S. and Western Europe.
For information regarding foreign currency matters, including the impact of
the devaluation of the Brazilian real in 1999, see Note 7 to the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements, "-- Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings
of the Company -- Risks of Operations in Emerging Markets" and "Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk." For additional information about
the accounting treatment of certain of Reliant Energy Latin America's foreign
investments, see Note 7 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
14
<PAGE>
The following table provides summary data regarding the actual results of
operations of Reliant Energy Latin America for 1999 and 1998 and pro forma
results of operations for 1997 (in millions):
ACTUAL PRO FORMA
-------------- -------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
-------------- -------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
Operating Revenues........................... $ 80 $259 $92
Operating Expenses:
Fuel....................................... 49 25 21
Operation and Maintenance.................. 49 48 50
Depreciation and amortization.............. 5 4 4
---- ---- ---
Total Operating Expenses........... 103 77 75
---- ---- ---
Operating Income (Loss)...................... $(23) $182 $17
==== ==== ===
1999 (Actual) Compared to 1998 (Actual). In 1999, Reliant Energy Latin
America had an operating loss of $23 million compared to operating income of
$182 million in 1998. The operating loss for 1999 includes a $102 million
(after-tax) loss resulting from the effect of the devaluation of the Brazilian
real on equity earnings of the Company's Brazilian investments. In addition, the
decrease was due to a $138 million pre-tax gain on the sale of a 63% interest in
an Argentine electric distribution company in 1998 partially offset by increased
contributions from Argener and EDESE, a cogeneration project and a utility in
Argentina, and increased equity earnings in 1999.
1998 (Actual) Compared to 1997 (Pro Forma). Reliant Energy Latin America had
operating income of $182 million in 1998 compared to pro forma operating income
of $17 million in 1997. The increase in operating income is primarily due to a
$138 million pre-tax gain on the sale discussed above. Equity earnings from
investments in utility systems in El Salvador and Colombia acquired in 1998 also
contributed to the increase in operating income.
CORPORATE
Corporate includes the operations of certain non-rate regulated retail
services businesses, a communications business offering enhanced data, voice and
other services to customers in Texas, certain real estate holdings and
unallocated corporate costs.
Corporate had an operating loss of $32 million for 1999 compared to a $50
million operating loss for 1998. The decreased loss was primarily due to
decreased state franchise taxes partially offset by increased general insurance
liability and information system expenses.
Corporate incurred an operating loss of $50 million for 1998 compared to a pro
forma operating loss of $36 million for 1997. The increased loss was primarily
due to development costs, increased expenses associated with information system
costs and increased liabilities associated with certain compensation plans.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS OF THE COMPANY
Earnings for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future
earnings and results. The level of future earnings depends on numerous factors
including (i) state and federal legislative or regulatory developments,
(ii) national or regional economic conditions, (iii) industrial, commercial and
residential growth in service territories of the Company, (iv) the timing and
extent of changes in commodity prices and interest rates, (v) weather variations
and other natural phenomena, (vi) growth in opportunities for the Company's
diversified operations, (vii) the results of financing efforts, (viii) the
ability to consummate and timing of consummation of pending acquisitions and
dispositions, (ix) the speed, degree and effect of continued electric industry
restructuring in North America and Western Europe, and (x) risks incidental to
the Company's overseas operations, including the effects of fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates.
15
<PAGE>
In order to adapt to the increasingly competitive environment, the Company
continues to evaluate a wide array of potential business strategies, including
business combinations or acquisitions involving other utility or non-utility
businesses or properties, internal restructuring, reorganizations or
dispositions of currently owned businesses and new products, services and
customer strategies.
Competition and Restructuring of the Texas Electric Utility Industry
The electric utility industry is becoming increasingly competitive due to
changing government regulations, technological developments and the availability
of alternative energy sources.
Texas Electric Choice Plan. In June 1999, the Texas legislature adopted
legislation that substantially amends the regulatory structure governing
electric utilities in Texas in order to allow retail competition beginning with
respect to pilot projects for up to 5% of each utility's load in all customer
classes in June 2001 and for all other customers on January 1, 2002. In
preparation for that competition, the Company expects to make significant
changes in the electric utility operations it conducts through Reliant Energy
HL&P. Under the Legislation, on January 1, 2002, most retail customers of
investor-owned electric utilities in Texas will be entitled to purchase their
electricity from any of a number of "retail electric providers" which will have
been certified by the Texas Utility Commission. Power generators will sell
electric energy to wholesale purchasers, including retail electric providers, at
unregulated rates beginning January 1, 2002. For further information regarding
the Legislation, see Note 3 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Stranded Costs. Pursuant to the Legislation, Reliant Energy HL&P will be
entitled to recover its stranded costs (i.e., the excess of net book value of
generation assets, as defined by the Legislation, over the market value of those
assets) and its regulatory assets related to generation. The Legislation
prescribes specific methods for determining the amount of stranded costs and the
details for their recovery. However, during the base rate freeze period from
1999 through 2001, earnings above the utility's authorized return formula will
be applied in a manner to accelerate depreciation of generation related plant
assets for regulatory purposes. In addition, depreciation expense for
transmission and distribution related assets may be redirected to generation
assets for regulatory purposes during that period. The Legislation also
provides for Reliant Energy HL&P, or a special purpose entity, to issue
securitization bonds for the recovery of generation related regulatory assets
and stranded costs. Any stranded costs not recovered through the securitization
bonds will be recovered through a non-bypassable charge to transmission and
distribution customers.
Accounting. At June 30, 1999, the Company performed an impairment test of its
previously regulated electric generation assets pursuant to SFAS No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of", on a plant specific basis. The Company determined that $797
million of electric generation assets were impaired as of June 30, 1999. Of
such amounts, $745 million relate to the South Texas Project and $52 million
relate to two gas-fired generation plants. The Legislation provides recovery of
this impairment through regulated cash flows during the transition period and
through non-bypassable charges to transmission and distribution customers. As
such, a regulatory asset has been recorded for an amount equal to the impairment
loss and is included on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as a
regulatory asset.
The impairment analysis requires estimates of possible future market prices,
load growth, competition and many other factors over the lives of the plants.
The resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on these underlying
assumptions. In addition, after January 10, 2004, Reliant Energy HL&P must
finalize and reconcile stranded costs (as defined by the Legislation) in a
filing with the Texas Utility Commission. Any difference between the fair
market value and the regulatory net book value of the generation assets (as
defined by the Legislation) will either be refunded or collected through future
transmission and distribution rates. This final reconciliation allows
alternative methods of third party valuation of the fair market value of these
assets, including outright sale, stock valuations and asset exchanges. Because
generally accepted accounting principles require the Company to estimate fair
market values on a plant-by-plant basis in advance of the final reconciliation,
the financial impacts of the Legislation with respect to stranded costs are
subject to material changes. Factors affecting such change may include
estimation risk, uncertainty of future energy prices and the economic lives of
the plants. If events occur that make the recovery of all or a portion of the
regulatory
16
<PAGE>
assets associated with the generation plant impairment loss and deferred debits
created from discontinuance of SFAS No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of
Certain Types of Regulation" pursuant to the Legislation no longer probable, the
Company will write off the corresponding balance of such assets as a non-cash
charge against earnings.
In the fourth quarter of 1999, Reliant Energy HL&P filed an application to
securitize its generation related regulatory assets as defined by the
Legislation. The Texas Utility Commission, Reliant Energy HL&P and other
interested parties have been discussing proposed methodologies for calculating
the amount of such assets to be securitized. The parties have reached an
agreement in principle as to the amount to be securitized, which reflects the
economic value of the nominal book amount which prior to the deregulation
legislation would have been collected through rates over a much longer time
period. The Company has determined that a pre-tax accounting loss of $282
million exists. Therefore, the Company recorded an after-tax extraordinary loss
of $183 million for this accounting impairment of these regulatory assets in
1999.
Transmission System Open Access. In February 1996, the Texas Utility
Commission adopted rules granting third-party users of transmission systems open
access to such systems at rates, terms and conditions comparable to those
available to utilities owning such transmission assets. Under the Texas Utility
Commission order implementing the rule, Reliant Energy HL&P was required to
separate, on an operational basis, its wholesale power marketing operations from
the operations of the transmission grid and, for purposes of transmission
pricing, to disclose each of its separate costs of generation, transmission and
distribution. Within ERCOT, an independent system operator (ISO) manages the
state's electric grid, ensuring system reliability and providing non-
discriminatory transmission access to all power producers and traders.
Transition Plan. In June 1998, the Texas Utility Commission approved the
Transition Plan filed by Reliant Energy HL&P in December 1997. Certain parties
have appealed the order approving the Transition Plan. The provisions of the
Transition Plan expired by their own terms as of December 31, 1999. For
additional information, see Note 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
COMPETITION--RELIANT ENERGY EUROPE OPERATIONS
The European energy market is highly competitive. In addition, over the next
several years, an increasing consolidation of the participants in the Dutch
generating market is expected to occur.
Reliant Energy Europe competes in the Netherlands primarily against the three
other largest Dutch generating companies, various cogenerators of electric
power, various alternate sources of power and non-Dutch generators of electric
power, primarily from Germany. At present, the Dutch electricity system has
three operational interconnection points with Germany and two interconnection
points with Belgium. There are also a number of projects that are at various
stages of development and that may increase the number of interconnections in
the future including interconnections with Norway and the United Kingdom. The
Belgian interconnections are used to import electricity from France but a larger
portion of Dutch imports comes from Germany. In 1998, net power imports into
the Netherlands were approximately 11.7 terawatt hours. Based on current
information, it is estimated that net power imports into the Netherlands in 1999
increased significantly from 1998.
In 1999, UNA and the three other largest Dutch generators supplied
approximately 60% of the electricity consumed in the Netherlands. Smaller Dutch
producers supplied about 28% and the remainder was imported. The Dutch
electricity market is expected to be gradually opened for wholesale competition
including certain commercial and industrial customers beginning in 2001.
Competition is expected to increase in subsequent years and it is anticipated
that the market for small businesses and residential customers will become open
to competition by 2007. The timing of the opening of these markets is subject,
however, to change at the discretion of the Minister of Economic Affairs.
The trading and marketing operations of Reliant Energy Europe will also be
subject to increasing levels of competition. As of March 1, 2000, there were
approximately 25 trading and marketing companies registered with the Amsterdam
Power Exchange. Competition for marketing customers is intense and is expected
to increase with the
17
<PAGE>
deregulation of the market. The primary elements of competition in both the
generation and trading and marketing side of Reliant Energy Europe's business
operations are price, credit-support and supply and delivery reliability.
COMPETITION--OTHER OPERATIONS
Wholesale Energy. By the third quarter of 2000, Reliant Energy expects that
the Company will own and operate over 8,000 MW of non-rate regulated electric
generation assets that serve the wholesale energy markets located in the states
of California and Florida, and the Southwest, Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions
of the United States. Competitive factors affecting the results of operations
of these generation assets include: new market entrants, construction by others
of more efficient generation assets, the actions of regulatory authorities and
weather.
Other competitors operate power generation projects in most of the regions
where the Company has invested in non-rate regulated generation assets.
Although local permitting and siting issues often reduce the risk of a rapid
growth in supply of generation capacity in any particular region, over time,
projects are likely to be built which will increase competition and lower the
value of some of the Company's non-rate regulated electric generation assets.
The regulatory environment of the wholesale energy markets in which the
Company invests may adversely affect the competitive conditions of those
markets. In several regions, notably California and in the PJM Power Pool
Region (in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States), the independent system
operators have chosen to rely on price caps and market redesigns as a way of
minimizing market volatility.
The results of operations of the Company's non-rate regulated generation
assets are also affected by the weather conditions in the relevant wholesale
energy markets. Extreme seasonal weather conditions typically increase the
demand for wholesale energy. Conversely, mild weather conditions typically have
the opposite effect. In some regions, especially California, weather conditions
associated with hydroelectric generation resources such as rainfall and snowpack
can significantly influence market prices for electric power by increasing or
decreasing the availability and timing of hydro-based generation which is
imported into the California market.
Competition for acquisition of international and domestic non-rate regulated
power projects is intense. The Company competes against a number of other
participants in the non-utility power generation industry, some of which have
greater financial resources and have been engaged in non-utility power projects
for periods longer than the Company and have accumulated larger portfolios of
projects. Competitive factors relevant to the non-utility power industry include
financial resources, access to non-recourse funding and regulatory factors.
Reliant Energy Services competes for sales in its natural gas, electric power
and other energy derivatives trading and marketing business with other energy
merchants, producers and pipelines based on its ability to aggregate supplies at
competitive prices from different sources and locations and to efficiently
utilize transportation from third-party pipelines and transmission from electric
utilities. Reliant Energy Services also competes against other energy marketers
on the basis of its relative financial position and access to credit sources.
This competitive factor reflects the tendency of energy customers, wholesale
energy suppliers and transporters to seek financial guarantees and other
assurances that their energy contracts will be satisfied. As pricing information
becomes increasingly available in the energy trading and marketing business and
as deregulation in the electricity markets continues to accelerate, the Company
anticipates that Reliant Energy Services will experience greater competition and
downward pressure on per-unit profit margins in the energy marketing industry.
Natural Gas Distribution. Natural Gas Distribution competes primarily with
alternate energy sources such as electricity and other fuel sources. In
addition, as a result of federal regulatory changes affecting interstate
pipelines, it has become possible for other natural gas suppliers and
distributors to bypass Natural Gas Distribution's facilities and market, sell
and/or transport natural gas directly to small commercial and/or large volume
customers.
Interstate Pipelines. The Interstate Pipelines segment competes with other
interstate and intrastate pipelines in the transportation and storage of natural
gas. The principal elements of competition among pipelines are rates, terms of
18
<PAGE>
service, and flexibility and reliability of service. Interstate Pipelines
competes indirectly with other forms of energy available to its customers,
including electricity, coal and fuel oils. The primary competitive factor is
price. Changes in the availability of energy and pipeline capacity, the level of
business activity, conservation and governmental regulations, the capability to
convert to alternative fuels, and other factors, including weather, affect the
demand for natural gas in areas served by Interstate Pipelines and the level of
competition for transport and storage services.
FLUCTUATIONS IN COMMODITY PRICES AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
For information regarding the Company's exposure to risk as a result of
fluctuations in commodity prices and derivative instruments, see "Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."
INDEXED DEBT SECURITIES (ACES AND ZENS) AND TIME WARNER INVESTMENT
For information on Reliant Energy's indexed debt securities and its investment
in TW Common, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk"
and Note 8 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
IMPACT OF THE YEAR 2000 ISSUE AND OTHER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
In 1997, the Company initiated a corporate-wide Year 2000 project to address
mainframe application systems, information technology (IT) related equipment,
system software, client-developed applications, building controls and non-IT
embedded systems such as process controls for energy production and delivery.
The evaluation of Year 2000 issues included those related to significant
customers, key vendors, service suppliers and other parties material to the
Company's operations.
Remediation and testing of all systems and equipment were completed during
1999. The Company did not experience any Year 2000 problems that significantly
affected the operations of the Company. The Company will continue to monitor
and assess potential future problems. Total direct costs of resolving the Year
2000 issue with respect to the Company were $29 million.
The Company is in the process of implementing SAP America, Inc.'s (SAP)
proprietary R/3 enterprise software. Although the implementation of the SAP
system had the incidental effect of negating the need to modify many of the
Company's computer systems to accommodate the Year 2000 problem, the Company
does not deem the costs of the SAP system as directly related to its Year 2000
compliance program. Portions of the SAP system were implemented in December
1998, March 1999 and September 1999, and it is expected that the final portion
of the SAP system will be fully implemented by the fourth quarter of 2002. The
cost of implementing the SAP system is currently estimated to be approximately
$237 million, inclusive of internal costs. As of December 31, 1999, $192
million has been spent on the implementation.
ENTRY INTO THE EUROPEAN MARKET
Reliant Energy Europe owns, operates and sells power from generation
facilities in the Netherlands and plans to participate in the emerging wholesale
energy trading and marketing industry in the Netherlands and other countries in
Europe. Reliant Energy expects that the Dutch electric industry will undergo
change in response to market deregulation in 2001. These expected changes
include the anticipated expiration of certain transition agreements which have
governed the basic tariff rates that UNA and other generators have charged their
customers. Based on current forecasts and other assumptions, the revenues of
UNA could decline significantly from 1999 revenues after 2000.
One of the factors that could have a significant impact on the Dutch energy
industry, including the operations of UNA, is the ultimate resolution of
stranded cost issues in the Netherlands. The Dutch government is currently
seeking to establish a transitional regime in order to solve the problem of
stranded costs, which relate primarily to investments and contracts entered into
by SEP and certain licensed generators prior to the liberalization of the
market. SEP is owned in equal shares by each of the four large Dutch generating
companies, including UNA.
19
<PAGE>
In connection with the acquisition of UNA, the selling shareholders of UNA
agreed to indemnify UNA for certain stranded costs in an amount not to exceed
NLG 1.4 billion (approximately $639 million based on an exchange rate of 2.19
NLG per U.S. dollar as of December 31, 1999), which may be increased in certain
circumstances at the option of the Company up to NLG 1.9 billion (approximately
$868 million). Of the total consideration paid by the Company for the shares of
UNA, NLG 900 million (approximately $411 million) has been placed by the selling
shareholders in an escrow account to secure the indemnity obligations. Although
Reliant Energy believes that the indemnity provision will be sufficient to cover
UNA's ultimate share of any stranded cost obligation, this belief is based on
numerous assumptions regarding the ultimate outcome and timing of the resolution
of the stranded cost issue, the existing shareholders timely performance of
their obligations under the indemnity arrangement, and the amount of stranded
costs which at present is not determinable.
The Dutch government is expected to propose a legislative initiative regarding
stranded costs to the Dutch cabinet in March 2000. The proposed legislation
will be sent to the Dutch council of state for review. It is not anticipated
that the legislation will be reviewed by parliament until late in the summer of
2000.
For information about the Company's exposure through its investment in Reliant
Energy Europe to losses resulting from fluctuations in currency rates, see
"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."
RISK OF OPERATIONS IN EMERGING MARKETS
Reliant Energy Latin America's operations are subject to various risks
incidental to investing or operating in emerging market countries. These risks
include political risks, such as governmental instability, and economic risks,
such as fluctuations in currency exchange rates, restrictions on the
repatriation of foreign earnings and/or restrictions on the conversion of local
currency earnings into U.S. dollars. The Company's Latin American operations are
also highly capital intensive and, thus, dependent to a significant extent on
the continued availability of bank financing and other sources of capital on
commercially acceptable terms.
Impact of Currency Fluctuations on Company Earnings. The Company owns 11.78%
of the stock of Light Servicos de Eletricidade S.A. (Light) and, through its
investment in Light, a 9.2% interest in the stock of Metropolitana Electricidade
de Sao Paulo S.A. (Metropolitana). As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, Light and
Metropolitana had total borrowings of $2.9 billion and $3.2 billion,
respectively, denominated in non-local currencies. During the first quarter of
1999, the Brazilian real was devalued and allowed to float against other major
currencies. The effects of devaluation on the non-local currency denominated
borrowings caused the Company to record an after-tax charge for the year ended
December 31, 1999 of $102 million as a result of foreign currency transaction
losses recorded by both Light and Metropolitana in such periods. For additional
information regarding the effect of the devaluation of the Brazilian real, see
Note 7(a) in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Light's and Metropolitana's tariff adjustment mechanisms are not directly
indexed to the U.S. dollar or other non-local currencies. To partially offset
the devaluation of the Brazilian real, and the resulting increased operating
costs and inflation, Light and Metropolitana received tariff rate increases of
16% and 21%, respectively, which were phased in during June and July 1999.
Light also received its annual rate adjustment in November 1999 resulting in a
tariff rate increase of 11%. The Company is pursuing additional tariff increases
to mitigate the impact of the devaluation; however, there can be no assurance
that such adjustments will be timely or that they will permit substantial
recovery of the impact of the devaluation.
Certain of Reliant Energy Latin America's other foreign electric distribution
companies have incurred U.S. dollar and other non-local currency indebtedness
(approximately $600 million at December 31, 1999). For further analysis of
foreign currency fluctuations in the Company's earnings and cash flows, see
"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk -- Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk."
20
<PAGE>
Impact of Foreign Currency Devaluation on Projected Capital Resources. The
ability of Light and Metropolitana to repay or refinance their debt obligations
at maturity is dependent on many factors, including local and international
economic conditions prevailing at the time such debt matures. If economic
conditions in the international markets continue to be unsettled or deteriorate,
it is possible that Light, Metropolitana and the other foreign electric
distribution companies in which the Company holds investments might encounter
difficulties in refinancing their debt (both local currency and non-local
currency borrowings) on terms and conditions that are commercially acceptable to
them and their shareholders. In such circumstances, in lieu of declaring a
default or extending the maturity, it is possible that lenders might seek to
require, among other things, higher borrowing rates, and additional equity
contributions and/or increased levels of credit support from the shareholders of
such entities. For a discussion of the Company's anticipated capital
contributions in 2000, see "-- Liquidity and Capital Resources -- Future Sources
and Uses of Cash Flows -- Reliant Energy Latin America Capital Contributions and
Advances." In 2000, $1.6 billion of debt obligations of Light and Metropolitana
will mature. The availability or terms of refinancing such debt cannot be
assured. Currency fluctuation and instability affecting Latin America may also
adversely affect the Company's ability to refinance its equity investments with
debt.
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPENDITURES
The Company is subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations, which
require it to incur substantial costs to operate existing facilities, construct
and operate new facilities, and mitigate or remove the effect of past operations
on the environment.
Clean Air Act Expenditures. The Company expects the majority of capital
expenditures associated with environmental matters to be incurred by Electric
Operations in connection with new emission limitations under the Federal Clean
Air Act (Clean Air Act) for oxides of nitrogen (NOx). NOx reduction costs
incurred by Electric Operations generating units in the Houston, Texas area
totaled approximately $7 million in 1999 and $7 million in 1998. The Texas
Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC) is currently considering
additional NOx reduction requirements for electric generating units and other
industrial sources located in the Houston metropolitan area and the eastern half
of Texas as a means to attain the Clean Air Act standard for ozone. Although
the magnitude and timing of these requirements will not be established by the
TNRCC until November, 2000, NOx reductions approaching 90% of the emissions
level are anticipated. Expenditures for NOx controls on Electric Operations'
generating units have been estimated at $500 million to $600 million during the
period 2000 through 2003, with an estimated $80 million to be incurred during
2000. In addition, the Legislation created a program mandating air emissions
reductions for certain generating facilities of Electric Operations. The
Legislation provides for stranded cost recovery for costs associated with this
obligation incurred before May 1, 2003. For further information regarding the
Legislation, see Note 3 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Site Remediation Expenditures. From time to time the Company has received
notices from regulatory authorities or others regarding its status as a
potentially responsible party in connection with sites found to require
remediation due to the presence of environmental contaminants. Based on
currently available information, Reliant Energy believes that remediation costs
will not materially affect its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. There can be no assurance, however, that future developments, including
additional information about existing sites or the identification of new sites,
will not require material revisions to Reliant Energy's estimates. For
information about specific sites that are the subject of remediation claims, see
Note 14(h) to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mercury Contamination. Like other natural gas pipelines, the Company's
pipeline operations have in the past employed elemental mercury in meters used
on its pipelines. Although the mercury has now been removed from the meters, it
is possible that small amounts of mercury have been spilled at some of those
sites in the course of normal maintenance and replacement operations and that
such spills have contaminated the immediate area around the meters with
elemental mercury. Such contamination has been found at some sites in the past,
and the Company has conducted remediation at sites found to be contaminated.
Although the Company is not aware of additional specific sites, it is possible
that other contaminated sites exist and that remediation costs will be incurred
for such sites. Although the total amount of such costs cannot be known at this
time, based on experience of the Company and others in the natural gas
21
<PAGE>
industry to date and on the current regulations regarding remediation of such
sites, the Company believes that the cost of any remediation of such sites will
not be material to the Company's financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Other. In addition, the Company has been named as a defendant in litigation
related to such sites and in recent years has been named, along with numerous
others, as a defendant in several lawsuits filed by a large number of
individuals who claim injury due to exposure to asbestos while working at sites
along the Texas Gulf Coast. Most of these claimants have been workers who
participated in construction of various industrial facilities, including power
plants, and some of the claimants have worked at locations owned by the Company.
The Company anticipates that additional claims like those received may be
asserted in the future and intends to continue its practice of vigorously
contesting claims which it does not consider to have merit. Although their
ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, the Company does not believe,
based on its experience to date, that these matters, either individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
OTHER CONTINGENCIES
For a description of certain other legal and regulatory proceedings affecting
the Company, see Notes 3, 4 and 14 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
COMPANY CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The liquidity and capital requirements of the Company are affected primarily
by capital programs and debt service requirements. Expenditures in the table
reflect only expenditures made or to be made under existing contractual
commitments as of December 31, 1999. The Company expects to continue to
participate as a bidder in future acquisitions of independent power projects and
privatizations of generation facilities. Such capital requirements are expected
to be met with excess cash flows from operations, the proceeds of project
financings and the proceeds of Company borrowings. Additional capital
expenditures are dependent upon the nature and extent of future project
commitments (some of which may be substantial). The capital requirements for
1999 were, and as estimated for 2000 through 2004 are, as follows (in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 2000 (1) 2001 2002 2003 2004
------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Electric Operations (with nuclear fuel) (2)........ $ 573 $ 722 $ 885 $ 520 $ 524 $ 528
Natural Gas Distribution........................... 206 197 161 162 162 165
Interstate Pipelines............................... 30 20 17 17 17 17
Wholesale Energy (2)(3)............................ 530 720 225 265 192 126
Reliant Energy Europe.............................. 834 980 5 5 5 5
Reliant Energy Latin America....................... 93
Corporate.......................................... 90 86 87 84 86 104
Payments of long-term debt, sinking fund
requirements and minimum capital lease (1)........ 936 409 773 670 741 58
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total............................................ $3,292 $3,134 $2,153 $1,723 $1,727 $1,003
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
__________
(1) Excludes the ACES (see Note 8 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements) as the ACES may be settled with the Company's investment in TW
Common.
(2) Beginning in 2002, capital requirements for current generation operations
of Reliant Energy HL&P are included in Wholesale Energy rather than in
Electric Operations.
(3) Amounts do not reflect capital requirements related to the $2.1 billion
cost of the pending Sithe power generating assets acquisition described in
Note 19 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
22
<PAGE>
The net cash provided by/used in operating, investing and financing activities
for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 is as follows (in
millions):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------- ------- -------
Cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities....................... $ 1,162 $ 1,425 $ 1,111
Investing activities....................... (2,897) (1,230) (1,981)
Financing activities....................... 1,794 (218) 914
Net cash provided by operations in 1999 decreased $263 million compared to
1998 reflecting a $142 million federal tax refund received in 1998 and other
changes in working capital. Net cash provided by operations in 1998 increased
$314 million over 1997 primarily due to incremental cash flow provided by the
business segments purchased in the Resources acquisition, increased sales at
Electric Operations due to unusually hot weather during the second and third
quarters of 1998, and the receipt of a federal tax refund in 1998.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $1.7 billion in 1999 compared
to 1998 primarily due to the cash portion of the purchase price for 52% of UNA
totaling $833 million, the purchase of 9.2 million shares of TW Common for $537
million, increased capital expenditures and the sale of an investment in an
Argentine electric distribution company in 1998 partially offset by equity
investments made in 1998 by Reliant Energy Latin America. Net cash used in
investing activities decreased $751 million in 1998 compared to 1997 due
primarily to the Resources acquisition in 1997.
Cash flows provided by financing activities increased approximately $2.0
billion in 1999 primarily due to cash received from short-term borrowings, the
net issuance of long-term debt and the issuance of trust preferred securities
aggregating $2.3 billion (see Notes 10 and 11 to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements), partially offset by $91 million of purchases of Reliant
Energy's common stock. The net borrowings incurred during 1999 were utilized to
purchase TW Common, to complete the first and second phases of the acquisition
of UNA, to support increased capital expenditures, and to fund the working
capital requirements of the Company. Cash flows provided by financing
activities decreased approximately $1.1 billion in 1998 compared to 1997
primarily due to a decline in short-term borrowings of $1.1 billion. The net
borrowings incurred during 1997 were utilized primarily to finance a portion of
the cost of the Resources acquisition.
FUTURE SOURCES AND USES OF CASH FLOWS
Credit Facilities. As of December 31, 1999, the Company had credit
facilities, including facilities of various financing subsidiaries, Resources
and UNA, which provide for an aggregate of $3.7 billion in committed credit. As
of December 31, 1999, $2.7 billion was outstanding under these facilities,
including commercial paper of $1.8 billion. Unused credit facilities totaled
$1.0 billion as of December 31, 1999. For further discussion, see Note 10(a) to
the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. In February 2000, a financing
subsidiary of the Company borrowed $500 million under a $650 million revolving
credit facility that was established in February 2000 and will terminate on
April 30, 2000. Proceeds were used by the financing subsidiary to purchase
Series G Preference Stock of Reliant Energy. The Company used the proceeds from
the sale of Preference Stock for general corporate purposes, including the
repayment of indebtedness. In addition, in March 2000, the Company borrowed
$150 million under a revolving credit facility that was established in February
2000 and will terminate on May 31, 2000. The Company used the proceeds from the
borrowing for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of
indebtedness.
Shelf Registrations. At December 31, 1999, the Company had shelf registration
statements providing for the issuance of $230 million aggregate liquidation
value of its preferred stock, $580 million aggregate principal amount of its
debt securities and $125 million of trust preferred securities and related
junior subordinated debt securities (see Note 11 to the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements). In addition, the Company has a shelf registration for 15
23
<PAGE>
million shares of common stock which would have been worth approximately $343
million as of December 31, 1999 based on the closing price of the common stock
as of such date.
Money Fund. Reliant Energy has a "money fund" through which it and certain of
its subsidiaries can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are
aggregated and borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The
money fund's net funding requirements are generally met with commercial paper.
Securitization. Reliant Energy HL&P has filed an application with the Texas
Utility Commission requesting a financing order authorizing the issuance by a
special purpose entity organized by the Company, pursuant to the Legislation, of
transition bonds relating to Reliant Energy HL&P's generation related regulatory
assets. The Company estimates that approximately $750 million of transition
bonds will be authorized by the Texas Utility Commission. Payments on the
transition bonds will be made out of funds derived from non-bypassable
transition charges assessed to Reliant Energy HL&P's transmission and
distribution customers. The offering and sale of the transition bonds will be
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and, absent any appeals, are
expected to be consummated in the second or third quarter of 2000. The
transition bonds will only be offered and sold by means of a prospectus. This
report does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to
buy nor will there be any sale of the transition bonds in any state in which
such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or
qualification under the securities laws of such state.
Acquisition of UNA. The Company completed the first and second phases of the
acquisition of 52% of UNA in the fourth quarter of 1999 which consisted of total
consideration of $833 million in cash and $426 million in a five-year promissory
note to UNA. The promissory note must be prepaid in certain circumstances. On
March 1, 2000, the remaining 48% of the UNA shares were purchased for
approximately $975 million in cash. The total purchase price, payable in NLG,
of approximately $2.4 billion includes the $426 million promissory note to UNA
and assumes an exchange rate of 2.0565 NLG per U.S. dollar (the exchange rate on
October 7, 1999). Funds for the March 1, 2000 obligation were obtained, in
part, from a Euro 600 million (approximately $596 million) three-year term loan
facility established in February 2000.
Acquisition of Sithe Assets. In February 2000, Power Generation signed a
definitive agreement to purchase from Sithe Energies, Inc. non-rate regulated
power generating assets and sites located in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and
Maryland having a net generating capacity of more than 4,200 MW for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $2.1 billion, subject to certain adjustments.
The acquisition is expected to close in the second quarter of 2000 subject to
obtaining certain regulatory approvals and satisfying other closing conditions.
The acquisition will be accounted for as a purchase. The Company has executed
bank commitment letters and expects to enter into a bridge loan prior to
obtaining permanent financing. The permanent financing is likely to include an
operating lease covering a portion of the generating assets.
Treasury Stock Purchases. As of December 31, 1999, the Company was authorized
under its common stock repurchase program to purchase an additional $298 million
of its common stock. The Company's purchases under its repurchase program
depend on market conditions, might not be announced in advance and may be made
in open market or privately negotiated transactions. For information on the
Company's purchases since December 31, 1999, see Note 19 to the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reliant Energy Latin America Capital Contributions and Advances. Reliant
Energy Latin America expects to make capital contributions or advances in 2000
totaling approximately $108 million as a result of debt service payments at
certain of its holding companies. It is expected that part of these capital
contributions will be paid from a return of capital from one of its investments,
dividends from certain of its operating companies, proceeds from the sale of
certain of its investments and from additional capital contributions from
Reliant Energy.
Channelview Project. The Company's 780 MW gas-fired cogeneration plant
located in Channelview, Texas, which is currently under construction, is
expected to cost $463 million, $71 million of which had been incurred as of
December
24
<PAGE>
31, 1999. The project has been financed through obtaining commitments for an
equity bridge loan of $92 million and a non-recourse loan of $369 million.
Other Sources/Uses of Cash. The Company participates from time to time in
competitive bids and the development of new projects for generating and
distribution assets. Although the Company believes that its current level of
cash and borrowing capability along with future cash flows from operations are
sufficient to meet the existing operational needs of its businesses, the Company
may, when it deems necessary, or when it develops or acquires new businesses and
assets, supplement its available cash resources by seeking funds in the equity
or debt markets.
NEW ACCOUNTING ISSUES
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company is required to adopt Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting For Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities," as amended (SFAS No. 133), which establishes accounting
and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain hedging
instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as
derivatives) and for hedging activities. The Company is in the process of
determining the effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 133 on its consolidated
financial statements.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company has long-term debt, Company obligated mandatorily redeemable
preferred securities of subsidiary trusts holding solely junior subordinated
debentures of the Company (Trust Preferred Securities), securities held in the
Company's nuclear decommissioning trust, bank facilities, certain lease
obligations and interest rate swaps which subject the Company to the risk of
loss associated with movements in market interest rates.
At December 31, 1999, the Company had issued fixed-rate debt (excluding
indexed debt securities) and Trust Preferred Securities aggregating $5.8 billion
in principal amount and having a fair value of $5.6 billion. These instruments
are fixed-rate and, therefore, do not expose the Company to the risk of loss in
earnings due to changes in market interest rates (see Notes 10 and 11 to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). However, the fair value of these
instruments would increase by approximately $305 million if interest rates were
to decline by 10% from their levels at December 31, 1999. In general, such an
increase in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if the Company
were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments in the open market prior
to their maturity.
The Company's floating-rate obligations aggregated $3.1 billion at December
31, 1999 (see Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements),
inclusive of (i) amounts borrowed under short-term and long-term credit
facilities of the Company (including the issuance of commercial paper supported
by such facilities), (ii) borrowings underlying a receivables facility and (iii)
amounts subject to a master leasing agreement under which lease payments vary
depending on short-term interest rates. These floating-rate obligations expose
the Company to the risk of increased interest and lease expense in the event of
increases in short-term interest rates. If the floating rates were to increase
by 10% from December 31, 1999 levels, the Company's consolidated interest
expense and expense under operating leases would increase by a total of
approximately $1.6 million each month in which such increase continued.
As discussed in Notes 1(l) and 6(c) to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Company contributes $14.8 million per year to a trust
established to fund the Company's share of the decommissioning costs for the
South Texas Project. The securities held by the trust for decommissioning costs
had an estimated fair value of $145 million as of December 31, 1999, of which
approximately 40% were fixed-rate debt securities that subject the Company to
risk of loss of fair value with movements in market interest rates. If interest
rates were to increase by 10% from their levels at December 31, 1999, the
decrease in fair value of the fixed-rate debt securities would not be material
to the Company. In addition, the risk of an economic loss is mitigated. Any
unrealized gains or losses are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 71 as a
regulatory asset/liability because the Company believes that its future
contributions which are currently recovered through the rate-making process will
be adjusted for these gains and losses. For further discussion
25
<PAGE>
regarding the recovery of decommissioning costs pursuant to the Legislation, see
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As discussed in Note 1(l) to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements,
UNA holds fixed-rate debt securities, which had an estimated fair value of $133
million as of December 31, 1999, that subject the Company to risk of loss of
fair value and earnings with movements in market interest rates. If interest
rates were to increase by 10% from their levels at December 31, 1999, the
decrease in fair value and loss in earnings from this investment would not be
material to the Company.
The Company has entered into interest rate swaps for the purpose of decreasing
the amount of debt subject to interest rate fluctuations. At December 31, 1999,
these interest rate swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $64 million and
the cost to terminate would not result in a material loss in earnings and cash
flows to the Company (see Note 5 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements). An increase of 10% in the December 31, 1999 level of interest rates
would not increase the cost of termination of the swaps by a material amount to
the Company. Swap termination costs would impact the Company's earnings and cash
flows only if all or a portion of the swap instruments were terminated prior to
their expiration.
As discussed in Note 10(b) to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements,
in November 1998, Resources sold $500 million aggregate principal amount of its
6 3/8% TERM Notes which included an embedded option to remarket the securities.
The option is expected to be exercised in the event that the ten-year Treasury
rate in 2003 is below 5.66%. At December 31, 1999, the Company could terminate
the option at a cost of $11 million. A decrease of 10% in the December 31, 1999
level of interest rates would increase the cost of termination of the option by
approximately $5 million.
EQUITY MARKET RISK
As discussed in Note 8 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the
Company owns approximately 55 million shares of TW Common, of which
approximately 38 million and 17 million shares are held by the Company to
facilitate its ability to meet its obligations under the ACES and ZENS,
respectively. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the market
value of the Company's TW Common are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. Increases in the market value of TW Common result in an increase in
the liability for the ZENS and ACES and are recorded as a non-cash expense.
Such non-cash expense will be offset by an unrealized gain on the Company's TW
Common investment. However, if the market value of TW Common declines below
$58.25, the ZENS payment obligation will not decline below its original
principal amount. As of December 31, 1999, the market value of TW Common was
$72.31 per share. A decrease of 10% from the December 31, 1999 market value of
TW Common would not result in a loss. As of March 1, 2000, the market value of
TW Common was $84.38 per share. In addition, the Company has a $14 million
investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1999, which is classified
as trading under SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities"(SFAS No. 115). In January 2000, the Company entered into
financial instruments (a put option and a call option) to manage price risks
related to the Company's investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. A decline in the
market value of this investment would not materially impact the Company's
earnings and cash flows. The Company also has a $9 million investment in Itron,
Inc. (Itron) which is classified as "available for sale" under SFAS No. 115. The
Itron investment exposes the Company to losses in the fair value of Itron common
stock. A 10% decline in the market value per share of Itron common stock from
the December 31, 1999 levels would not result in a material loss in fair value
to the Company.
As discussed above under "--Interest Rate Risk," the Company contributes to a
trust established to fund the Company's share of the decommissioning costs for
the South Texas Project which held debt and equity securities as of December 31,
1999. The equity securities expose the Company to losses in fair value. If the
market prices of the individual equity securities were to decrease by 10% from
their levels at December 31, 1999, the resulting loss in fair value of these
securities would not be material to the Company. Currently, the risk of an
economic loss is mitigated as discussed above under "--Interest Rate Risk."
26
<PAGE>
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK
As further described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Company -- Certain Factors Affecting
Future Earnings of the Company -- Risks of Operations in Emerging Markets," the
Company has investments in electric generation and distribution facilities in
Latin America with a substantial portion accounted for under the equity method.
In addition, as further discussed in Note 2 of the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements, during the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company completed
the first and second phases of the acquisition of 52% of the shares UNA, a Dutch
power generation company and completed the final phase of the acquisition on
March 1, 2000. These foreign operations expose the Company to risk of loss in
earnings and cash flows due to the fluctuation in foreign currencies relative to
the Company's consolidated reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. The Company
accounts for adjustments resulting from translation of its investments with
functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar as a charge or credit directly
to a separate component of stockholders' equity. The Company has entered into
foreign currency swaps and has issued Euro denominated debt to hedge its net
investment in UNA. Changes in the value of the swap and debt are recorded as
foreign currency translation adjustments as a component of stockholders' equity.
For further discussion of the accounting for foreign currency adjustments, see
Note 1(m) in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The cumulative
translation loss of $77 million, recorded as of December 31, 1999, will be
realized as a loss in earnings and cash flows only upon the disposition of the
related investments. The cumulative translation loss was $34 million as of
December 31, 1998. The increase in cumulative translation loss from December
31, 1998 to December 31, 1999, was primarily due to the impact of devaluation of
the Brazilian real on the Company's investments in Light and Metropolitana.
In addition, certain of Reliant Energy Latin America's foreign operations have
entered into obligations in currencies other than their own functional
currencies which expose the Company to a loss in earnings. In such cases, as
the respective investment's functional currency devalues relative to the non-
local currencies, the Company will record its proportionate share of its
investments' foreign currency transaction losses related to the non-local
currency denominated debt. At December 31, 1999, Light and Metropolitana of
which the Company owns 11.78% and 9.2%, respectively, had total borrowings of
approximately $2.9 billion denominated in non-local currencies. As described in
Note 7 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, in 1999 the Company
reported a $102 million (after-tax) charge to net income and a $43 million
charge to other comprehensive income, due to the devaluation of the Brazilian
real. The charge to net income reflects increases in the liabilities at Light
and Metropolitana for their non-local currency denominated borrowings using the
exchange rate in effect at December 31, 1999 and a monthly weighted average
exchange rate for the year then ended. The charge to other comprehensive income
reflects the translation effect on the local currency denominated net assets
underlying the Company's investment in Light. As of December 31, 1999, the
Brazilian real exchange rate was 1.79 per U.S. dollar. An increase of 10% from
the December 31, 1999 exchange rate would result in the Company recording an
additional charge of $20 million and $23 million to net income and other
comprehensive income, respectively. As of March 1, 2000, the Brazilian real
exchange rate was 1.77 per U.S. dollar.
The Company attempts to manage and mitigate this foreign currency risk by
balancing the cost of financing with local denominated debt against the risk of
devaluation of that local currency and including a measure of the risk of
devaluation in its financial plans. In addition, where possible, Reliant Energy
Latin America attempts to structure its tariffs and revenue contracts to ensure
some measure of adjustment due to changes in inflation and currency exchange
rates; however, there can be no assurance that such efforts will compensate for
the full effect of currency devaluation, if any.
ENERGY COMMODITY PRICE RISK
As further described in Note 5 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Company utilizes a variety of derivative financial instruments
(Derivatives), including swaps, over-the-counter options and exchange-traded
futures and options, as part of the Company's overall hedging strategies and for
trading purposes. To reduce the risk from the adverse effect of market
fluctuations in the price of electric power, natural gas, crude oil and refined
products and related transportation and transmission, the Company enters into
futures transactions, forward contracts, swaps and options (Energy Derivatives)
in order to hedge certain commodities in storage, as well as certain expected
purchases, sales,
27
<PAGE>
transportation and transmission of energy commodities (a portion of which are
firm commitments at the inception of the hedge). The Company's policies prohibit
the use of leveraged financial instruments. In addition, Reliant Energy Services
maintains a portfolio of Energy Derivatives to provide price risk management
services and for trading purposes (Trading Derivatives).
The Company uses value-at-risk and a sensitivity analysis method for assessing
the market risk of its derivatives.
With respect to the Energy Derivatives (other than Trading Derivatives) held
by the Company as of December 31, 1999, an increase of 10% in the market prices
of natural gas and electric power from year-end levels would have decreased the
fair value of these instruments by approximately $12 million. As of December
31, 1998, a decrease of 10% in the market prices of natural gas and electric
power from year-end levels would have decreased the fair value of these
instruments by approximately $3 million.
The above analysis of the Energy Derivatives utilized for hedging purposes
does not include the favorable impact that the same hypothetical price movement
would have on the Company's physical purchases and sales of natural gas and
electric power to which the hedges relate. Furthermore, the Energy Derivative
portfolio is managed to complement the physical transaction portfolio, reducing
overall risks within limits. Therefore, the adverse impact to the fair value of
the portfolio of Energy Derivatives held for hedging purposes associated with
the hypothetical changes in commodity prices referenced above would be offset by
a favorable impact on the underlying hedged physical transactions, assuming
(i) the Energy Derivatives are not closed out in advance of their expected term,
(ii) the Energy Derivatives continue to function effectively as hedges of the
underlying risk and (iii) as applicable, anticipated transactions occur as
expected.
The disclosure with respect to the Energy Derivatives relies on the assumption
that the contracts will exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions.
If the underlying transactions or positions are liquidated prior to the maturity
of the Energy Derivatives, a loss on the financial instruments may occur, or the
options might be worthless as determined by the prevailing market value on their
termination or maturity date, whichever comes first.
With respect to the Trading Derivatives held by Reliant Energy Services,
consisting of natural gas, electric power, crude oil and refined products,
weather derivatives, physical forwards, swaps, options and exchange-traded
futures and options, the Company is exposed to losses in fair value due to
changes in the price and volatility of the underlying derivatives. During the
years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, the highest, lowest and average monthly
value-at-risk in the Trading Derivative portfolio was less than $10 million at a
95% confidence level and for a holding period of one business day. The Company
uses the variance/covariance method for calculating the value-at-risk and
includes delta approximation for option positions.
The Company has established a Risk Oversight Committee comprised of corporate
and business segment officers that oversees all commodity price and credit risk
activities, including derivative trading and hedging activities discussed above.
The committee's duties are to establish the Company's commodity risk policies,
allocate risk capital within limits established by the Company's board of
directors, approve trading of new products and commodities, monitor risk
positions and ensure compliance with the Company's risk management policies and
procedures and the trading limits established by the Company's board of
directors.
28
<PAGE>
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA OF THE COMPANY
----------------------------------------------------------
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(Thousands of Dollars, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES.......................................................... $15,302,810 $11,488,464 $6,878,225
EXPENSES:
Fuel and cost of gas sold........................................ 6,748,325 4,840,505 2,865,701
Purchased power.................................................. 4,137,414 2,215,049 698,823
Operation and maintenance........................................ 1,821,471 1,625,343 1,218,579
Taxes other than income taxes.................................... 443,964 471,656 374,702
Depreciation and amortization.................................... 911,122 870,093 665,374
----------- ----------- ----------
Total.......................................................... 14,062,296 10,022,646 5,823,179
----------- ----------- ----------
OPERATING INCOME.................................................. 1,240,514 1,465,818 1,055,046
----------- ----------- ----------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Unrealized gain in Time Warner investment........................ 2,452,406
Unrealized loss on indexed debt securities....................... (629,523) (1,176,211) (121,402)
Time Warner dividend income...................................... 25,770 41,250 41,340
Interest income - IRS refund..................................... 56,269
Other, net....................................................... 38,375 36,421 19,801
----------- ----------- ----------
Total.......................................................... 1,887,028 (1,098,540) (3,992)
----------- ----------- ----------
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES:
Interest......................................................... 511,474 509,601 395,085
Distribution on trust preferred securities....................... 51,220 29,201 26,230
Preferred dividends of subsidiary................................ 2,255
----------- ----------- ----------
Total.......................................................... 562,694 538,802 423,570
----------- ----------- ----------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES, EXTRAORDINARY ITEM AND
PREFERRED DIVIDENDS.............................................. 2,564,848 (171,524) 627,484
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)...................................... 899,117 (30,432) 206,374
----------- ----------- ----------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS... 1,665,731 (141,092) 421,110
Extraordinary Item, net of income tax of $98,679.................. 183,261
----------- ----------- ----------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PREFERRED DIVIDENDS.......................... 1,482,470 (141,092) 421,110
Preferred Dividends............................................... 389 390 162
----------- ----------- ----------
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS............. $ 1,482,081 $ (141,482) $ 420,948
=========== =========== ==========
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Income (Loss) Before Extraordinary Item.......................... $ 5.84 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== =========== ==========
Extraordinary Item............................................... $ (.64) $ $
=========== =========== ==========
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders............ $ 5.20 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== =========== ==========
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Income (Loss) Before Extraordinary Item.......................... $ 5.82 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== =========== ==========
Extraordinary Item............................................... $ (.64) $ $
=========== =========== ==========
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders............ $ 5.18 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
29
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Thousands of Dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
---------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> C>
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders................ $1,482,081 $(141,482) $420,948
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax of $23,143,
$17,656 and $247)................................................... (42,979) (32,790) (458)
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities (net of tax of
$373, $5,877 and $1,181)............................................ (1,224) (10,370) (1,897)
----------- ---------- ---------
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)........................................... $1,437,878 $(184,642) $418,593
=========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
30
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Thousands of Dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------------------
1999 1998
--------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................................................... $ 89,078 $ 29,673
Investment in Time Warner common stock...................................................... 3,979,461
Accounts receivable - net................................................................... 1,104,640 726,377
Accrued unbilled revenues................................................................... 172,629 175,515
Fuel stock and petroleum products........................................................... 152,292 211,750
Materials and supplies, at average cost..................................................... 188,167 171,998
Price risk management assets................................................................ 435,336 265,203
Prepayments and other current assets........................................................ 131,666 88,655
----------- -----------
Total current assets....................................................................... 6,253,269 1,669,171
----------- -----------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET.......................................................... 13,267,395 11,503,114
----------- -----------
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill and other intangibles - net........................................................ 3,034,361 2,098,890
Equity investments and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries.............................. 1,022,210 1,051,600
Investment in Time Warner preferred stock................................................... 990,000
Regulatory assets........................................................................... 1,739,507 1,313,362
Price risk management assets................................................................ 148,722 21,414
Deferred debits............................................................................. 755,472 490,971
----------- -----------
Total other assets......................................................................... 6,700,272 5,966,237
----------- -----------
Total Assets............................................................................... $26,220,936 $19,138,522
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Short-term borrowings....................................................................... $ 2,879,211 $ 1,812,739
Current portion of long-term debt........................................................... 4,382,136 397,454
Accounts payable............................................................................ 1,036,839 807,977
Taxes accrued............................................................................... 227,058 252,581
Interest accrued............................................................................ 116,274 115,201
Dividends declared.......................................................................... 110,811 111,058
Price risk management liabilities........................................................... 424,324 227,652
Accumulated deferred income taxes........................................................... 415,591
Business purchase obligation................................................................ 431,570
Other....................................................................................... 360,109 346,280
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities.................................................................. 10,383,923 4,070,942
----------- -----------
DEFERRED CREDITS:
Accumulated deferred income taxes........................................................... 2,451,619 2,364,036
Unamortized investment tax credit........................................................... 270,243 328,949
Price risk management liabilities........................................................... 117,437 40,532
Benefit obligations......................................................................... 400,849 378,747
Business purchase obligation................................................................ 596,303
Other....................................................................................... 1,027,648 490,468
----------- -----------
Total deferred credits..................................................................... 4,864,099 3,602,732
----------- -----------
LONG-TERM DEBT............................................................................... 4,961,310 6,800,748
----------- -----------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 14)
COMPANY OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS HOLDING
SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES OF THE COMPANY........................................ 705,272 342,232
----------- -----------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY......................................................................... 5,306,332 4,321,868
----------- -----------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity................................................. $26,220,936 $19,138,522
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
31
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Thousands of Dollars)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------------- --------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders................ $ 1,482,081 $ (141,482) $ 420,948
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization....................................... 911,122 870,093 665,374
Deferred income taxes............................................... 601,627 (423,904) 35,523
Investment tax credit............................................... (58,706) (20,123) (19,777)
Unrealized gain on Time Warner investment........................... (2,452,406)
Unrealized loss on indexed debt securities.......................... 629,523 1,176,211 121,402
Extraordinary item.................................................. 183,261
Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries............... 28,308 (27,350) (3,142)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable - net.......................................... (333,195) 266,938 (436,580)
Inventories........................................................ 51,576 (121,793) 55,111
Accounts payable................................................... 185,710 (92,652) 191,840
Other - net........................................................ (67,236) (60,579) 80,060
----------- ----------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities........................ 1,161,665 1,425,359 1,110,759
----------- ----------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures................................................. (1,179,466) (743,455) (328,724)
Investment in Time Warner securities................................. (537,055)
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired.......................... (871,168) (1,422,672)
Acquisition of non-rate regulated electric power plants.............. (188,832) (292,398)
Investments and advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries.............. (116,076) (445,042) (234,852)
Sale of equity investments in foreign electric system projects....... 242,744
Other - net.......................................................... (4,288) 8,375 4,795
Net cash used in investing activities............................. (2,896,885) (1,229,776) (1,981,453)
----------- ----------- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt - net................................... 2,032,386 1,267,107 1,136,516
Payments of long-term debt........................................... (935,908) (733,114) (780,186)
Proceeds from sale of trust preferred securities - net............... 362,994 340,785
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings - net................... 822,868 (312,217) 787,084
Redemption of preferred stock........................................ (153,628)
Payment of common stock dividends.................................... (427,255) (426,265) (405,288)
Purchase of treasury stock........................................... (90,708)
Other - net.......................................................... 30,248 (13,133) (10,878)
----------- ----------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.............. 1,794,625 (217,622) 914,405
----------- ----------- ----------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.................. 59,405 (22,039) 43,711
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD...................... 29,673 51,712 8,001
----------- ----------- ----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD............................ $ 89,078 $ 29,673 $ 51,712
=========== =========== ===========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash Payments:
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)................................ $ 517,897 $ 502,889 $ 414,467
Income taxes......................................................... 401,703 484,376 171,539
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
32
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
------------ ------------- -------------- ---------------- -------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Preference Stock, none outstanding.....
======= ------------ =========== ----------- ========== -----------
CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK
Balance, beginning of year............ 97 $ 9,740 97 $ 9,740 1,347 $ 135,179
Redemption of preferred stock......... (1,250) (125,439)
------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Balance, end of year.................. 97 9,740 97 9,740 97 9,740
======= ------------ =========== ----------- ========== -----------
COMMON STOCK, NO PAR; AUTHORIZED
700,000,000 SHARES
Balance, beginning of year............ 296,271 3,136,826 295,357 3,112,098 262,748 2,447,117
Issuances related to benefit and
investment plans..................... 1,341 46,062 914 24,734 811 16,737
Issuances of common stock in business
acquisition.......................... 47,840 1,011,924
Treasury shares retired............... (16,042) (361,196)
Other................................. (137) (6) (2,484)
------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Balance, end of year.................. 297,612 3,182,751 296,271 3,136,826 295,357 3,112,098
======= ------------ =========== ----------- ========== -----------
TREASURY STOCK
Balance, beginning of year............ (103) (2,384) (93) (2,066) (16,042) (361,196)
Shares acquired....................... (3,524) (90,708)
Treasury stock retired................ 16,042 361,196
Other................................. 2 (204) (10) (318) (93) (2,066)
------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Balance, end of year.................. (3,625) (93,296) (103) (2,384) (93) (2,066)
======= ------------ =========== ----------- ========== -----------
UNEARNED ESOP STOCK
Balance, beginning of year............ (11,674) (217,780) (12,389) (229,827) (13,371) (251,350)
Issuances related to benefit plans.... 995 18,554 715 12,047 982 21,523
------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- -----------
Balance, end of year.................. (10,679) (199,226) (11,674) (217,780) (12,389) (229,827)
======= ------------ =========== ----------- ========== -----------
RETAINED EARNINGS
Balance, beginning of year............ 1,445,081 2,013,055 1,997,490
Net income............................ 1,482,081 (141,482) 420,948
Common stock dividends - $1.50 per
share................................ (426,981) (426,492) (405,383)
----------- ----------- ----------
Balance, end of year.................. 2,500,181 1,445,081 2,013,055
----------- ----------- ----------
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Balance, beginning of year............ (49,615) (6,455) (4,100)
Foreign currency translation
adjustments.......................... (42,979) (32,790) (458)
Unrealized loss on available for sale
securities........................... (1,224) (10,370) (1,897)
----------- ----------- ----------
Balance, end of year.................. (93,818) (49,615) (6,455)
----------- ----------- ----------
Total Stockholders' Equity............ $5,306,332 $4,321,868 $4,896,545
=========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
33
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Years Ended December 31, 1999
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Nature of Operations.
Reliant Energy, Incorporated (Reliant Energy), formerly Houston Industries
Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company), is a
diversified international energy services company. Reliant Energy is both an
electric utility company and a utility holding company.
The Company's financial reporting segments include the following: Electric
Operations, Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate Pipelines, Wholesale Energy,
Reliant Energy Europe, Reliant Energy Latin America and Corporate. Electric
Operations includes the operations of Reliant Energy HL&P, an electric utility.
Natural Gas Distribution consists of natural gas sales to, and natural gas
transportation for, residential, commercial and industrial customers.
Interstate Pipelines includes the interstate natural gas pipeline operations.
Wholesale Energy is engaged in the acquisition, development and operation of
non-rate regulated power generation facilities as well as the wholesale energy
trading, marketing and risk management services, and the natural gas gathering
business in North America. Reliant Energy Europe, which was formed in 1999, is
engaged in the operation of power generation facilities in the Netherlands and
plans to participate in wholesale energy trading and marketing in Europe.
Reliant Energy Latin America primarily participates in the privatization of
foreign generation and distribution facilities and independent power projects in
Latin America. Corporate includes the Company's unregulated retail electric and
gas services businesses, a communications business, certain real estate holdings
and corporate costs.
In February 1999, the Company began doing business as Reliant Energy,
Incorporated. On May 5, 1999, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment
to its Restated Articles of Incorporation to change its name to "Reliant Energy,
Incorporated."
(b) Business Acquisitions.
For information regarding the Company's accounting for the acquisition of
capital stock of N.V. UNA (UNA) in 1999 and the acquisition of Reliant Energy
Resources Corp. (Resources Corp.) and its subsidiaries (collectively,
Resources), formerly NorAm Energy Corp., by the Company in 1997, see Note 2.
(c) Texas Electric Choice Plan and Discontinuance of SFAS No. 71 for Electric
Generation Operations.
For information regarding the Texas Electric Choice Plan (Legislation) and
discontinuance of SFAS No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation" (SFAS No. 71), for Reliant Energy HL&P's electric generation
operations, see Note 3.
(d) Regulatory Assets.
The Company applies the accounting policies established in SFAS No. 71 to the
accounts of transmission and distribution operations of Reliant Energy HL&P and
Natural Gas Distribution and to certain of the accounts of Interstate Pipelines.
For information regarding Reliant Energy HL&P's electric generation operations'
discontinuance of the application of SFAS No. 71 and the effect on its
regulatory assets, see Note 3.
The following is a list of regulatory assets/liabilities reflected on the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1999, detailed by
Electric Operations and other segments.
34
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ELECTRIC TOTAL
OPERATIONS Other COMPANY
-------------- -------------- --------------
(Millions of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Recoverable impaired plant costs -- net.................................. $ 587 $ $ 587
Recoverable electric generation related regulatory assets -- net......... 952 952
Regulatory tax liability -- net.......................................... (45) (45)
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt...................................... 69 69
Other deferred debits/credits............................................ (18) 4 (14)
------- ----- -------
Total.......................................................... $ 1,545 $ 4 $ 1,549
------- ----- -------
</TABLE>
Included in the above table is $191 million of regulatory liabilities recorded
as other deferred credits in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 1999, which primarily relates to the over recovery of Electric
Operations' fuel costs, gains on nuclear decommissioning trust funds, regulatory
tax liabilities and excess deferred income taxes.
Under a "deferred accounting" plan authorized by the Public Utility Commission
of Texas (Texas Utility Commission), Electric Operations was permitted for
regulatory purposes to accrue carrying costs in the form of allowance for funds
used during construction (AFUDC) on its investment in the South Texas Project
Electric Generating Station (South Texas Project) and to defer and capitalize
depreciation and other operating costs on its investment after commercial
operation until such costs were reflected in rates. In addition, the Texas
Utility Commission authorized Electric Operations under a "qualified phase-in
plan" to capitalize allowable costs (including return) deferred for future
recovery as deferred charges. These costs are included in recoverable electric
generation related regulatory assets.
In 1991, Electric Operations ceased all cost deferrals related to the South
Texas Project and began amortizing such amounts on a straight-line basis. Prior
to January 1, 1999, the accumulated deferrals for "deferred accounting" were
being amortized over the estimated depreciable life of the South Texas Project.
Starting in 1991, the accumulated deferrals for the "qualified phase-in plan"
were amortized over a ten-year phase-in period. The amortization of all deferred
plant costs (which totaled $26 million for each of the years 1998 and 1997) is
included on the Company's Statements of Consolidated Income as depreciation and
amortization expense. Pursuant to the Legislation (see Note 3), the Company
discontinued amortizing deferred plant costs effective January 1, 1999.
In 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company, as permitted by the 1995 rate case
settlement (Rate Case Settlement), also amortized $22 million, $4 million and
$66 million (pre-tax), respectively, of its investment in certain lignite
reserves associated with a canceled generating station. The remaining investment
in these reserves of $14 million is included in the above table as a component
of recoverable electric generation related regulatory assets and will be
amortized fully by December 31, 2001.
For additional information regarding recoverable impaired plant costs and
recoverable electric generation related assets, see Note 3.
If, as a result of changes in regulation or competition, the Company's ability
to recover these assets and liabilities would not be assured, then pursuant to
SFAS No. 101, "Regulated Enterprises Accounting for the Discontinuation of
Application of SFAS No. 71" (SFAS No. 101) and SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of"
(SFAS No. 121), the Company would be required to write off or write down such
regulatory assets and liabilities, unless some form of transition cost recovery
continues through rates established and collected for their remaining regulated
operations. In addition, the Company would be required to determine any
impairment to the carrying costs of plant and inventory assets.
35
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(e) Principles of Consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Reliant Energy
and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries including, effective as of
their acquisition dates, the accounts of UNA and Resources. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
Investments in entities in which the Company has an ownership interest between
20% and 50% or is able to exercise significant influence are accounted for using
the equity method. For additional information regarding investments recorded
using the equity method of accounting, see Note 7.
(f) Property, Plant and Equipment and Goodwill.
Property, plant and equipment includes the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1999 1998
------------ ------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Electric................................................................. $ 16,725,004 $ 13,941,275
Natural gas.............................................................. 1,941,668 1,686,159
Interstate pipelines..................................................... 1,330,969 1,302,829
Other property........................................................... 136,079 72,299
------------ ------------
Total................................................................... 20,133,720 17,002,562
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization........................... 6,866,325 5,499,448
------------ ------------
Property, plant and equipment - net..................................... $ 13,267,395 $ 11,503,114
============ ============
</TABLE>
Property, plant and equipment are stated at original cost. See Note 3 for
discussion of the impairment of previously regulated electric generation plant
and equipment. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed. The cost of utility
plant and equipment retirements is charged to accumulated depreciation.
Goodwill is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 to 40 years. The
Company had $139 million and $77 million accumulated goodwill and other
intangibles amortization at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The
Company will periodically compare the carrying value of its goodwill to the
anticipated undiscounted future net cash flows from the businesses whose
acquisition gave rise to the goodwill and as of yet no impairment is indicated.
(g) Depreciation and Amortization Expense.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on economic
lives or a regulatory mandated method. The range of plant and equipment
depreciable lives for electric, natural gas, interstate pipelines and other
property are 2 to 58 years, 5 to 50 years, 5 to 75 years and 3 to 40 years,
respectively. Depreciation expense for 1999 was $552 million compared to $561
million for 1998 and $488 million for 1997. Goodwill amortization relating to
acquisitions including UNA and Resources was $62 million, $55 million and $22
million in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. For additional information
regarding goodwill in connection with the respective acquisitions of UNA and
Resources, see Note 2. Other amortization expense, including amortization of
regulatory assets, was $297 million, $254 million and $155 million in 1999, 1998
and 1997, respectively. For information regarding amortization of deferred
plant costs and investments in certain lignite reserves included in regulatory
assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, see Note 1(d). For information
regarding the amortization of recoverable impaired plant costs included in
regulatory assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, see Note 3.
In June 1998, the Texas Utility Commission issued an order approving a
transition to competition plan (Transition Plan) filed by Electric Operations in
December 1997. In order to reduce Electric Operations' exposure to potentially
stranded costs related to generation assets, the Transition Plan permitted the
redirection to generation
36
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
assets of depreciation expense that Electric Operations otherwise would apply to
transmission, distribution and general plant assets. In addition, the Transition
Plan provides that all earnings above a stated overall annual rate of return on
invested capital be used to recover Electric Operations' investment in
generation assets. Electric Operations implemented the Transition Plan effective
January 1, 1998 and pursuant to its terms, recorded an aggregate of $104 million
in additional depreciation and $99 million in redirected depreciation for the
first six months in 1999 and $194 million in additional depreciation and $195
million in redirected depreciation in 1998 pursuant to the Transition Plan. Due
to the discontinuance of SFAS No. 71 to Electric Operations' generation
operations, the provisions for additional and redirected depreciation of the
Transition Plan are no longer applied. For additional information regarding this
legislation, see Note 3.
Pursuant to the Legislation, the Company is allowed to recover the generation
related regulatory assets reported in the Company's Form 10-K as of December 31,
1998. Therefore, the Company discontinued amortizing certain generation related
regulatory assets effective as of January 1, 1999.
The Company's depreciation expense included $50 million of additional
depreciation relating to the South Texas Project in 1997. The depreciation
expense recorded for the South Texas Project was made pursuant to the terms of
the Company's 1995 Rate Case Settlement.
(h) Fuel Stock and Petroleum Products.
Gas inventory (primarily using the average cost method) was $93 million and
$96 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Coal and lignite
inventory balances (using last-in, first-out) were $46 million and $31 million
at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Oil inventory balances,
principally heating oil, were $13 million and $85 million at December 31, 1999
and 1998, respectively. Heating oil that is used in trading operations is
marked-to-market in connection with the price risk management activities as
discussed in Note 5.
(i) Revenues.
The Company records electricity and natural gas sales under the accrual
method, whereby unbilled electricity and natural gas sales are estimated and
recorded each month. Reliant Energy Latin America revenues include electricity
sales of majority owned foreign electric utilities, which are also recorded
under the accrual method, and equity income (net of foreign taxes) in equity
investments. In 1998, Reliant Energy Latin America's revenues included the gain
on the sale of an Argentine distribution system. In 1998, the Company adopted
mark-to-market accounting for its energy price risk management and trading
activities. (See Notes 1(o) and 5).
(j) Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash equivalents are considered to be
short-term, highly liquid investments readily convertible to cash.
(k) Income Taxes.
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. The Company
follows a policy of comprehensive interperiod income tax allocation. The
Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and
measures deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary
differences. Investment tax credits were deferred and are being amortized over
the estimated lives of the related property. For additional information
regarding income taxes, see Note 13.
(l) Investment in Other Debt and Equity Securities.
The debt and equity securities held in the Company's nuclear decommissioning
trust are classified as "available-for-sale" and, in accordance with SFAS
No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
37
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Equity Securities" (SFAS No. 115), are reported at estimated fair value of $145
million as of December 31, 1999 and $119 million as of December 31, 1998 in the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets in deferred debits. The liability for
nuclear decommissioning is reported in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets
in other deferred credits. Any unrealized losses or gains are accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 71 as a regulatory asset/liability.
The Company also holds certain other marketable equity securities classified
as "available-for-sale" and reports such investments at estimated fair value in
the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as deferred debits and any unrealized
gain or loss, net of tax, as a separate component of stockholders' equity and
other comprehensive income. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the accumulated
unrealized loss, net of tax, relating to these equity securities was $17 million
and $16 million, respectively.
UNA holds $133 million of debt securities which are classified as "trading" in
accordance with SFAS No. 115. As of December 31, 1999, this investment is
recorded in deferred debits in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. For
information regarding the Company's investment in Time Warner common stock which
is classified as "trading" under SFAS No. 115, see Note 8.
(m) Foreign Currency Adjustments.
Foreign subsidiaries' assets and liabilities where the local currency is the
functional currency have been translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange
rate at the balance sheet date. Revenues, expenses, gains and losses have been
translated using the weighted average exchange rate for each month prevailing
during the periods reported. Cumulative adjustments resulting from translation
have been recorded in stockholders' equity in other comprehensive income.
However, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S.
dollar can have an impact on the reported equity earnings of the Company's
foreign investments. For additional information about the Company's investments
in Brazil and the devaluation of the Brazilian real in 1999, see Note 7.
When the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, the financial statements of
such foreign subsidiaries are remeasured in U.S. dollars using historical
exchange rates for non-monetary accounts and the current rate at the respective
balance sheet date and the weighted average exchange rate for all other balance
sheet and income statement accounts, respectively. All exchange gains and
losses from remeasurement and foreign currency transactions are included in
consolidated net income.
(n) Reclassifications and Use of Estimates.
Certain amounts from the previous years have been reclassified to conform to
the 1999 presentation of financial statements. Such reclassifications do not
affect earnings.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
(o) Change in Accounting Principle.
For discussion of discontinuance of SFAS No. 71 to the Reliant Energy HL&P's
electric generation operations, see Note 3.
In the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company adopted mark-to-market accounting
for all of its energy price risk management and trading activities. Under mark-
to-market accounting, the Company records the fair value of energy related
derivative financial instruments, including physical forward contracts, swaps,
options and exchange-traded futures and option contracts at each balance sheet
date. Such amounts are recorded as price risk management assets
38
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
and liabilities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The realized and
unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of revenues. The Company
applied mark-to-market accounting retroactively to January 1, 1998. There was no
material cumulative effect resulting from this accounting change.
The Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 98-10, "Accounting for
Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities"
(EITF 98-10) in 1999. The adoption of EITF 98-10 had no material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
(p) New Accounting Pronouncement.
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as amended (SFAS
No. 133), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain hedging instruments embedded in other contracts
and for hedging activities. The Company is in the process of determining the
effect of adopting SFAS No. 133 on its consolidated financial statements.
(2) BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
During 1999, the Company completed the first two phases of the acquisition of
UNA, a Dutch power generation company. The Company acquired 40% and 12% of
UNA's capital stock on October 7, 1999 and December 1, 1999, respectively. The
aggregate purchase price paid by the Company in connection with the first two
phases consisted of a total of $833 million in cash and $426 million in a five-
year promissory note to UNA. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, the
Company purchased the remaining shares of UNA on March 1, 2000 for approximately
$975 million. The commitment for this purchase was recorded as a business
purchase obligation in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1999
based on an exchange rate of 2.19 Dutch guilders (NLG) per U.S. dollar (the
exchange rate on December 31, 1999). A portion ($596 million) of the business
purchase obligation was recorded as a non-current liability as this portion of
the obligation was financed with a three-year term loan facility (see Note 19).
Effective October 1, 1999, the Company has recorded 100% of the operating
results of UNA. The total purchase price, payable in NLG, of approximately $2.4
billion includes the $426 million promissory note to UNA and assumes an exchange
rate of 2.0565 NLG per U.S. dollar (the exchange rate on October 7, 1999). The
Company recorded the acquisition under the purchase method of accounting with
assets and liabilities of UNA reflected at their estimated fair values. The
excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired of
approximately $840 million was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized over
35 years. On a preliminary basis, the Company's fair value adjustments included
increases in property, plant and equipment, long-term debt, and related deferred
taxes. The Company expects to finalize these fair value adjustments during
2000; however, it is not anticipated that any additional adjustments will be
material.
In August 1997, the former parent corporation (Former Parent) of the Company,
merged with and into Reliant Energy, and NorAm Energy Corp., a natural gas
gathering, transmission, marketing and distribution company (Former NorAm),
merged with and into Resources Corp. Effective upon the mergers (collectively,
the Merger), each outstanding share of common stock of Former Parent was
converted into one share of common stock (including associated preference stock
purchase rights) of the Company, and each outstanding share of common stock of
Former NorAm was converted into the right to receive $16.3051 cash or 0.74963
shares of common stock of the Company. The aggregate consideration paid to
Former NorAm stockholders in connection with the Merger consisted of $1.4
billion in cash and 47.8 million shares of the Company's common stock valued at
approximately $1.0 billion. The overall transaction was valued at $4.0 billion
consisting of $2.4 billion for Former NorAm's common stock and common stock
equivalents and $1.6 billion of Former NorAm debt. The Company recorded the
acquisition under the purchase method of accounting with assets and liabilities
of Former NorAm reflected at their estimated fair values. The Company recorded
the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets
acquired of $2.1 billion as goodwill and is amortizing this amount over 40
years. The Company's fair value adjustments included increases in property,
plant and equipment, long-term debt, unrecognized pension and postretirement
benefits liabilities and related deferred taxes.
39
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The Company's results of operations incorporate UNA's and Resources' results
of operations only for the period beginning with the effective date of their
respective acquisition. The following tables present certain actual financial
information for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997; unaudited pro
forma information for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, as if the
acquisition of UNA had occurred on January 1, 1999 and 1998; and unaudited pro
forma information for the year ended December 31, 1997, as if the Merger with
Resources had occurred on January 1, 1997.
ACTUAL AND PRO FORMA COMBINED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
---------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------
ACTUAL PRO FORMA ACTUAL PRO FORMA Actual Pro forma
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
(UNAUDITED) (UNAUDITED) (Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues............................... $15,303 $15,784 $11,488 $12,320 $6,878 $10,191
Net income (loss) attributable to
common stockholders................... 1,482 1,525 (141) (61) 421 437
Basic earnings per share............... 5.20 5.35 (.50) (.21) 1.66 1.55
Diluted earnings per share............. 5.18 5.33 (.50) (.21) 1.66 1.55
</TABLE>
These pro forma results are based on assumptions deemed appropriate by the
Company's management, have been prepared for informational purposes only and are
not necessarily indicative of the combined results that would have resulted if
the acquisition of UNA had occurred on January 1, 1999 and 1998 and the Merger
with Resources had occurred on January 1, 1997. Purchase related adjustments to
results of operations include amortization of goodwill and the effects on
depreciation, amortization, interest expense and deferred income taxes of the
assessed fair value of certain UNA and Resources assets and liabilities.
(3) TEXAS ELECTRIC CHOICE PLAN AND DISCONTINUANCE OF SFAS NO. 71 FOR ELECTRIC
GENERATION OPERATIONS
In June 1999, the Texas legislature adopted the Texas Electric Choice Plan
(Legislation). The Legislation substantially amends the regulatory structure
governing electric utilities in Texas in order to allow retail competition
beginning with respect to pilot projects for up to 5% of each utility's load in
all customer classes in June 2001 and for all other customers on January 1,
2002. In preparation for that competition, the Company expects to make
significant changes in the electric utility operations it conducts through
Reliant Energy HL&P. In addition, the Legislation requires the Texas Utility
Commission to issue a number of new rules and determinations in implementing the
Legislation.
The Legislation defines the process for competition and creates a transition
period during which most utility rates are frozen at rates not in excess of
their present levels. The Legislation provides for utilities to recover their
generation related stranded costs and regulatory assets (as defined in the
Legislation).
Retail Choice. Under the Legislation, on January 1, 2002, most retail
customers of investor-owned electric utilities in Texas will be entitled to
purchase their electricity from any of a number of "retail electric providers"
which will have been certified by the Texas Utility Commission. Retail electric
providers will not own or operate generation assets and their sales rates will
not be subject to traditional cost-of-service rate regulation. Retail electric
providers which are affiliates of electric utilities may compete substantially
statewide for these sales, but rates they charge within the affiliated electric
utility's traditional service territory are subject to certain limitations at
the outset of retail choice, as described below. The Texas Utility Commission
will prescribe regulations governing quality, reliability and other aspects of
service from retail electric providers. Transmission between the regulated
utility and its current and future competitive affiliates is subject to
regulatory scrutiny and must comply with a code of conduct established by the
Texas Utility Commission. The code of conduct governs interactions between
employees of
40
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
regulated and current and future unregulated affiliates as well as the exchange
of information between such affiliates.
Unbundling. By January 1, 2002, electric utilities in Texas such as Reliant
Energy HL&P will restructure their businesses in order to separate power
generation, transmission and distribution, and retail activities into different
units. Pursuant to the Legislation, the Company submitted a plan in January
2000 to accomplish the required separation of its regulated operations into
separate units and is awaiting approval from the Texas Utility Commission. The
transmission and distribution business will continue to be subject to cost-of-
service rate regulation and will be responsible for the delivery of electricity
to retail consumers.
Generation. Power generators will sell electric energy to wholesale
purchasers, including retail electric providers, at unregulated rates beginning
January 1, 2002. To facilitate a competitive market, Reliant Energy HL&P and
most other electric utilities will be required to sell at auction entitlements
to 15% of their installed generating capacity no later than 60 days before
January 1, 2002. That obligation to auction entitlements continues until the
earlier of January 1, 2007 or the date the Texas Utility Commission determines
that at least 40% of the residential and small commercial load served in the
electric utility's service area is being served by non-affiliated retail
electric providers. In addition, a power generator that owns and controls more
than 20% of the power generation in, or capable of delivering power to, a power
region after the reductions from the capacity auction (calculated as prescribed
in the Legislation) must submit a mitigation plan to reduce generation that it
owns and controls to no more than 20% in the power region. The Legislation also
creates a program mandating air emissions reductions for non-permitted
generating facilities. The Company anticipates that any stranded costs
associated with this obligation incurred before May 1, 2003 will be recoverable
through the stranded cost recovery mechanisms contained in the Legislation.
Rates. Base rates charged by Reliant Energy HL&P on September 1, 1999 will be
frozen until January 1, 2002. Effective January 1, 2002, retail rates charged
to residential and small commercial customers by the utility's affiliated retail
electric provider will be reduced by 6% from the average rates (on a bundled
basis) in effect on January 1, 1999. That reduced rate will be known as the
"price to beat" and will be charged by the affiliated retail electric provider
to residential and small commercial customers in Reliant Energy HL&P's service
area who have not elected service from another retail electric provider. The
affiliated retail electric provider may not offer different rates to residential
or small commercial customer classes in the utility's service area until the
earlier of the date the Texas Utility Commission determines that 40% of power
consumed by that class is being served by non-affiliated retail electric
providers or January 1, 2005. In addition, the affiliated retail electric
provider must make the price to beat available to eligible consumers until
January 1, 2007.
Stranded Costs. Reliant Energy HL&P will be entitled to recover its stranded
costs (i.e., the excess of net book value of generation assets (as defined by
the Legislation) over the market value of those assets) and its regulatory
assets related to generation. The Legislation prescribes specific methods for
determining the amount of stranded costs and the details for their recovery.
However, during the base rate freeze period from 1999 through 2001, earnings
above the utility's authorized return formula will be applied in a manner to
accelerate depreciation of generation related plant assets for regulatory
purposes. In addition, depreciation expense for transmission and distribution
related assets may be redirected to generation assets for regulatory purposes
during that period.
The Legislation provides for Reliant Energy HL&P, or a special purpose entity,
to issue securitization bonds for the recovery of generation related regulatory
assets and stranded costs. These bonds will be sold to third parties and will
be amortized through non-bypassable charges to transmission and distribution
customers. Any stranded costs not recovered through the securitization bonds
will be recovered through a non-bypassable charge to transmission and
distribution customers. Costs associated with nuclear decommissioning that have
not been recovered as of January 1, 2002, will continue to be subject to cost-
of-service rate regulation and will be included in a non-bypassable charge to
transmission and distribution customers.
41
<PAGE>
In November 1999, Reliant Energy HL&P filed an application with the Texas
Utility Commission requesting a financing order authorizing the issuance by a
special purpose entity organized by the Company, pursuant to the Legislation, of
transition bonds related to Reliant Energy HL&P's generation-related regulatory
assets. The Company believes the Texas Utility Commission will authorize the
issuance of approximately $750 million of transition bonds. Payments on the
transition bonds will be made out of funds derived from non-bypassable
transition charges to Reliant Energy HL&P's transmission and distribution
customers. The offering and sale of the transition bonds will be registered
under the Securities Act of 1933 and, absent any appeals, are expected to be
consummated in the second or third quarter of 2000.
Accounting. Historically, Reliant Energy HL&P has applied the accounting
policies established in SFAS No. 71. In general, SFAS No. 71 permits a company
with cost-based rates to defer certain costs that would otherwise be expensed to
the extent that it meets the following requirements: (1) its rates are regulated
by a third party; (2) its rates are cost-based; and (3) there exists a
reasonable assumption that all costs will be recoverable from customers through
rates. When a company determines that it no longer meets the requirements of
SFAS No. 71, pursuant to SFAS No. 101 and SFAS No. 121, it is required to write
off regulatory assets and liabilities unless some form of recovery continues
through rates established and collected from remaining regulated operations. In
addition, such company is required to determine any impairment to the carrying
costs of deregulated plant and inventory assets in accordance with SFAS No. 121.
In July 1997, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board reached a consensus on Issue No. 97-4, "Deregulation
of the Pricing of Electricity - Issues Related to the Application of FASB
Statements No. 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation,
and No. 101, Regulated Enterprises Accounting for the Discontinuation of
Application of FASB Statement No. 71" (EITF No. 97-4). EITF No. 97-4 concluded
that a company should stop applying SFAS No. 71 to a segment which is subject to
a deregulation plan at the time the deregulation legislation or enabling rate
order contains sufficient detail for the utility to reasonably determine how the
plan will affect the segment to be deregulated. In addition, EITF No. 97-4
requires that regulatory assets and liabilities be allocated to the applicable
portion of the electric utility from which the source of the regulated cash
flows will be derived.
The Company believes that the Legislation provides sufficient detail regarding
the deregulation of the Company's electric generation operations to require it
to discontinue the use of SFAS No. 71 for those operations. Effective June 30,
1999, the Company applied SFAS No. 101 to its electric generation operations.
Reliant Energy HL&P's transmission and distribution operations continue to meet
the criteria of SFAS No. 71.
In 1999, the Company evaluated the recovery of its generation related
regulatory assets and liabilities. The Company determined that a pre-tax
accounting loss of $282 million exists because it believes only the economic
value of its generation related regulatory assets (as defined by the
Legislation) will be recovered. Therefore, the Company recorded a $183 million
after tax extraordinary loss in the fourth quarter of 1999. If events were to
occur that made the recovery of certain of the remaining generation related
regulatory assets no longer probable, the Company would write off the remaining
balance of such assets as a non-cash charge against earnings. Pursuant to EITF
No. 97-4, the remaining recoverable regulatory assets will not be written off
and will become associated with the transmission and distribution portion of the
Company's electric utility business. For details regarding the Reliant Energy
HL&P's regulatory assets, see Note 1(d).
At June 30, 1999, the Company performed an impairment test of its previously
regulated electric generation assets pursuant to SFAS No. 121 on a plant
specific basis. Under SFAS No. 121, an asset is considered impaired, and should
be written down to fair value, if the future undiscounted net cash flows
expected to be generated by the use of the asset are insufficient to recover the
carrying amount of the asset. For assets that are impaired pursuant to SFAS
No. 121, the Company determined the fair value for each generating plant by
estimating the net present value of future cash inflows and outflows over the
estimated life of each plant. The difference between fair value and net book
value was recorded as a reduction in the current book value. The Company
determined that $797 million of
42
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
electric generation assets were impaired as of June 30, 1999. Of such amounts,
$745 million relates to the South Texas Project and $52 million relates to two
gas-fired generation plants. The Legislation provides recovery of this
impairment through regulated cash flows during the transition period and through
non-bypassable charges to transmission and distribution customers. As such, a
regulatory asset has been recorded for an amount equal to the impairment loss
and is included on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as a regulatory
asset. In addition, the Company recorded an additional $12 million of
recoverable impaired plant costs in the third quarter of 1999 related to
previously incurred costs that are now estimated to be recoverable pursuant to
the Legislation. During the third and fourth quarter of 1999, the Company
recorded amortization expense related to the recoverable impaired plant costs
and other deferred debits created from discontinuing SFAS No. 71 of $221
million. The Company will continue to amortize this regulatory asset as it is
recovered from regulated cash flows.
The impairment analysis requires estimates of possible future market prices,
load growth, competition and many other factors over the lives of the plants.
The resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on these underlying
assumptions. In addition, after January 10, 2004, Reliant Energy HL&P must
finalize and reconcile stranded costs (as defined by the Legislation) in a
filing with the Texas Utility Commission. Any difference between the fair
market value and the regulatory net book value of the generation assets (as
defined by the Legislation) will either be refunded or collected through future
non-bypassable charges. This final reconciliation allows alternative methods of
third party valuation of the fair market value of these assets, including
outright sale, stock valuations and asset exchanges. Because generally accepted
accounting principles require the Company to estimate fair market values on a
plant-by-plant basis in advance of the final reconciliation, the financial
impacts of the Legislation with respect to stranded costs are subject to
material changes. Factors affecting such change may include estimation risk,
uncertainty of future energy prices and the economic lives of the plants. If
events occur that make the recovery of all or a portion of the regulatory assets
associated with the generation plant impairment loss and deferred debits created
from discontinuance of SFAS No. 71 pursuant to the Legislation no longer
probable, the Company will write off the corresponding balance of such assets as
a non-cash charge against earnings. One of the results of discontinuing the
application of SFAS No. 71 for the generation operations is the elimination of
the regulatory accounting effects of excess deferred income taxes and investment
tax credits related to such operations. The Company believes it is probable
that some parties will seek to return such amounts to ratepayers and
accordingly, the Company has recorded an offsetting liability.
Following are the classes of electric property, plant and equipment at cost,
with associated accumulated depreciation at December 31, 1999 (including the
impairment loss discussed above) and December 31, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Transmission General Consolidated Electric
Generation Distribution and Intangible Plant in Service
------------- ------------------ ------------------ ---------------------
(Millions of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1999:
- ------------------
Original cost........................... $ 11,202 $ 4,531 $ 992 $ 16,725
Accumulated depreciation................ 4,767 1,263 251 6,281
-------- ------- ----- --------
Property, plant and equipment - net(1).. $ 6,435 $ 3,268 $ 741 $ 10,444
======== ======= ===== ========
December 31, 1998:
- -----------------
Original cost........................... $ 8,843 $ 4,196 $ 902 $ 13,941
Accumulated depreciation................ 3,822 1,276 207 5,305
-------- ------- ----- --------
Property, plant and equipment - net(1).. $ 5,021 $ 2,920 $ 695 $ 8,636
======== ======= ===== ========
</TABLE>
_____________________
(1) Includes non-rate regulated domestic and international generation
facilities of $696 million and $338 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998,
respectively, and international distribution facilities of $32 million and
$19 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Also, includes
property, plant and equipment of UNA of $1.8 billion at December 31, 1999.
43
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
In order to reduce potential exposure to stranded costs related to generation
assets, Reliant Energy HL&P redirected $99 million and $195 million of
depreciation in the six months ended June 30, 1999, and the year ended December
31, 1998, respectively, from transmission and distribution related plant assets
to generation assets for regulatory and financial reporting purposes. Such
redirection was in accordance with the Company's Transition Plan. See Note 4 for
additional information regarding the Transition Plan. The Legislation provides
that depreciation expense for transmission and distribution related assets may
be redirected to generation assets during the base rate freeze period from 1999
through 2001. For regulatory purposes, the Company has continued to redirect
transmission and distribution depreciation to generation assets. Beginning June
30, 1999, redirected depreciation expense cannot be recorded by the electric
generation operations portion of Reliant Energy HL&P for financial reporting
purposes as this portion of electric operations is no longer accounted for under
SFAS No. 71. During the third and fourth quarters of 1999, $99 million in
depreciation expense has been redirected from transmission and distribution for
regulatory purposes and has been established as an embedded regulatory asset
included in transmission and distribution related plant and equipment balances.
As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, the cumulative amount of redirected
depreciation for regulatory purposes is $393 million and $195 million,
respectively.
The Company reviewed its long-term purchase power contracts and fuel
contracts for potential loss in accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for
Contingencies" and Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory
Pricing." Based on projections of future market prices for wholesale
electricity, the analysis indicated no loss recognition is appropriate at this
time.
Other Accounting Policy Changes. As a result of discontinuing SFAS No. 71,
the accounting policies discussed below related to Electric Operations'
generation operations have been changed effective July 1, 1999. Allowance for
funds used during construction will no longer be accrued on generation related
construction projects. Instead, interest will be capitalized on these projects
in accordance with SFAS No. 34, "Capitalization of Interest Cost."
Previously, in accordance with SFAS No. 71, Reliant Energy HL&P deferred the
premiums and expenses that arose when long term debt was redeemed and amortized
these costs over the life of the new debt. If no new debt was issued, these
costs were amortized over the remaining original life of the retired debt.
Effective July 1, 1999, costs resulting from the retirement of debt attributable
to the generation operations of Reliant Energy HL&P will be recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of
Debt," unless such costs will be recovered through regulated cash flows. In
that case, these costs will be deferred and recorded as a regulatory asset by
the entity through which the source of the regulated cash flows will be derived.
During the third and fourth quarters of 1999, the generation portion of Reliant
Energy HL&P incurred $11 million of losses from extinguishment of debt which
Reliant Energy HL&P's transmission and distribution operations have recorded as
a regulatory asset. This regulatory asset will be amortized along with
recoverable impaired plant costs as the assets are recovered pursuant to the
Legislation.
(4) TRANSITION PLAN
In June 1998, the Texas Utility Commission issued an order in Docket No. 18465
approving the Company's Transition Plan filed by Electric Operations in December
1997. The Transition Plan included base rate credits to residential customers of
4% in 1998 and an additional 2% in 1999. Commercial customers whose monthly
billing is 1,000 kva or less are entitled to receive base rate credits of 2% in
each of 1998 and 1999. The Company implemented the Transition Plan effective
January 1, 1998. For additional information regarding the Transition Plan, see
Note 1(g).
Review of the Texas Utility Commission's order in Docket No. 18465 is
currently pending before the Travis County District Court. In August 1998, the
Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas and a Texas municipality
filed an appeal seeking, among other things, to reverse the portion of the Texas
Utility Commission's order relating to the redirection of depreciation expenses
under the Transition Plan. The Office of the Attorney
44
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
General has withdrawn its appeal, but the Texas municipality continues to
maintain its appeal. Because of the number of variables that can affect the
ultimate resolution of an appeal of Texas Utility Commission orders, the Company
cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the ultimate effect that adverse
action by the courts could have on the Company.
(5) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) Price Risk Management and Trading Activities.
The Company offers energy price risk management services primarily related to
natural gas, electricity, crude oil and refined products, weather, coal and
certain air emissions regulatory credits. The Company provides these services
by utilizing a variety of derivative financial instruments, including fixed and
variable-priced physical forward contracts, fixed and variable-priced swap
agreements and options traded in the over-the-counter financial markets and
exchange-traded energy futures and option contracts (Trading Derivatives).
Fixed-price swap agreements require payments to, or receipts of payments from,
counterparties based on the differential between a fixed and variable price for
the commodity. Variable-price swap agreements require payments to, or receipts
of payments from, counterparties based on the differential between industry
pricing publications or exchange quotations.
Prior to 1998, the Company applied hedge accounting to certain physical
commodity activities that qualified for hedge accounting. In 1998, the Company
adopted mark-to-market accounting for all of its price risk management and
trading activities. Accordingly, since 1998, such Trading Derivatives are
recorded at fair value with realized and unrealized gains (losses) recorded as a
component of revenues. The recognized, unrealized balance is included in price
risk management assets/liabilities (See Note 1(o)).
The notional quantities, maximum terms and the estimated fair value of Trading
Derivatives at December 31, 1999 and 1998 are presented below (volumes in
billions of British thermal units equivalent (Bbtue) and dollars in millions):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VOLUME-FIXED
VOLUME-FIXED PRICE MAXIMUM
PRICE PAYOR RECEIVER TERM (YEARS)
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1999
- ----
Natural gas.................................................. 936,716 939,416 9
Electricity.................................................. 251,592 248,176 10
Crude oil and refined products............................... 143,857 144,554 3
1998
- ---
Natural gas.................................................. 937,264 977,293 9
Electricity.................................................. 122,950 124,878 3
Crude oil and refined products............................... 205,499 204,223 3
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FAIR VALUE AVERAGE FAIR VALUE (A)
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
1999 ASSETS LIABILITIES ASSETS LIABILITIES
- ---- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Natural gas.............................................. $ 319 $ 299 $ 302 $ 283
Electricity.............................................. 131 98 103 80
Crude oil and refined products........................... 134 145 127 132
$ 584 $ 542 $ 532 $ 495
===== ===== ===== =====
1998
- ----
Natural gas.............................................. $ 224 $ 212 $ 124 $ 108
Electricity.............................................. 34 33 186 186
Crude oil and refined products........................... 29 23 21 17
$ 287 $ 268 $ 331 $ 311
===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
____________________
(a) Computed using the ending balance of each quarter.
45
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
In addition to the fixed-price notional volumes above, the Company also has
variable-priced agreements, as discussed above, totaling 3,797,824 and 1,702,977
Bbtue as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Notional amounts reflect
the volume of transactions but do not represent the amounts exchanged by the
parties to the financial instruments. Accordingly, notional amounts do not
accurately measure the Company's exposure to market or credit risks.
All of the fair values shown in the tables above at December 31, 1999 and 1998
have been recognized in income. The fair value as of December 31, 1999 and 1998
was estimated using quoted prices where available and considering the liquidity
of the market for the Trading Derivatives. The prices and fair values are
subject to significant changes based on changing market conditions.
The weighted-average term of the trading portfolio, based on volumes, is less
than one year. The maximum and average terms disclosed herein are not indicative
of likely future cash flows, as these positions may be changed by new
transactions in the trading portfolio at any time in response to changing market
conditions, market liquidity and the Company's risk management portfolio needs
and strategies. Terms regarding cash settlements of these contracts vary with
respect to the actual timing of cash receipts and payments.
In addition to the risk associated with price movements, credit risk is also
inherent in the Company's risk management activities. Credit risk relates to
the risk of loss resulting from non-performance of contractual obligations by a
counterparty. The following table shows the composition of the total price risk
management assets of the Company as of December 31, 1999 and 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Investment Investment
Grade (1) Total Grade (1) Total
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(Millions of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Energy marketers................................. $ 172 $ 183 $ 103 $ 124
Financial institutions........................... 119 119 62 62
Gas and electric utilities....................... 184 186 47 48
Oil and gas producers............................ 6 30 7 8
Industrials...................................... 4 5 2 3
Independent power producers...................... 4 6 1 1
Others........................................... 64 67 45 47
----- ----- ----- ----
Total.......................................... $ 553 596 $ 267 293
===== =====
Credit and other reserves........................ (12) (6)
----- -----
Energy price risk management assets(2)........... $ 584 $ 287
===== =====
</TABLE>
_________
(1) "Investment Grade" is primarily determined using publicly available credit
ratings along with the consideration of credit support (e.g., parent
company guarantees) and collateral, which encompass cash and standby
letters of credit.
(2) As of December 31, 1999, the Company had no credit risk exposure to any
single counterparty that represents greater than 5% of price risk
management assets.
(b) Non-Trading Activities.
To reduce the risk from market fluctuations in the revenues derived from
electric power, natural gas and related transportation, the Company enters into
futures transactions, swaps and options (Energy Derivatives) in order to hedge
certain natural gas in storage, as well as certain expected purchases, sales and
transportation of natural gas and electric power (a portion of which are firm
commitments at the inception of the hedge). Energy Derivatives are
46
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
also utilized to fix the price of compressor fuel or other future operational
gas requirements and to protect natural gas distribution earnings against
unseasonably warm weather during peak gas heating months, although usage to date
for this purpose has not been material. The Company applies hedge accounting
with respect to its derivative financial instruments utilized in non-trading
activities.
The Company utilizes interest-rate derivatives (principally interest-rate
swaps) in order to adjust the portion of its overall borrowings which are
subject to interest rate risk and also utilizes such derivatives to effectively
fix the interest rate on debt expected to be issued for refunding purposes. In
addition, in 1999, the Company entered into foreign currency swaps to hedge a
portion of its investment in UNA.
For transactions involving either Energy Derivatives or interest-rate and
foreign currency derivatives, hedge accounting is applied only if the derivative
(i) reduces the risk of the underlying hedged item and (ii) is designated as a
hedge at its inception. Additionally, the derivatives must be expected to result
in financial impacts which are inversely correlated to those of the item(s) to
be hedged. This correlation (a measure of hedge effectiveness) is measured both
at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, with an acceptable level
of correlation of at least 80% for hedge designation. If and when correlation
ceases to exist at an acceptable level, hedge accounting ceases and mark-to-
market accounting is applied.
In the case of interest-rate swaps associated with existing obligations, cash
flows and expenses associated with the interest-rate derivative transactions are
matched with the cash flows and interest expense of the obligation being hedged,
resulting in an adjustment to the effective interest rate. When interest rate
swaps are utilized to effectively fix the interest rate for an anticipated debt
issuance, changes in the market value of the interest-rate derivatives are
deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the effective interest rate on the
newly issued debt.
In the case of the foreign currency swaps which hedge a portion of the
Company's investment in UNA, income or loss associated with the foreign currency
derivative transactions is recorded as foreign currency translation adjustments
as a component of stockholders' equity. Such amounts generally offset amounts
recorded in stockholders' equity as adjustments resulting from translation of
the hedged investment into U.S. dollars.
Unrealized changes in the market value of Energy Derivatives utilized as
hedges are not generally recognized in the Company's Statements of Consolidated
Income until the underlying hedged transaction occurs. Once it becomes probable
that an anticipated transaction will not occur, deferred gains and losses are
recognized. In general, the financial impact of transactions involving these
Energy Derivatives is included in the Company's Statements of Consolidated
Income under the captions (i) fuel expenses, in the case of natural gas
transactions and (ii) purchased power, in the case of electric power
transactions. Cash flows resulting from these transactions in Energy Derivatives
are included in the Company's Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows in the same
category as the item being hedged.
At December 31, 1999, the Company was fixed-price payors and fixed-price
receivers in Energy Derivatives covering 33,108 billion British thermal units
(Bbtu) and 5,481 Bbtu of natural gas, respectively. At December 31, 1998, the
Company was fixed-price payors and fixed-price receivers in Energy Derivatives
covering 42,498 Bbtu and 3,930 Bbtu of natural gas, respectively. Also, at
December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company was a party to variable-priced Energy
Derivatives totaling 44,958 Bbtu and 21,437 Bbtu of natural gas, respectively.
The weighted average maturity of these instruments is less than one year.
The notional amount is intended to be indicative of the Company's level of
activity in such derivatives, although the amounts at risk are significantly
smaller because, in view of the price movement correlation required for hedge
accounting, changes in the market value of these derivatives generally are
offset by changes in the value associated with the underlying physical
transactions or in other derivatives. When Energy Derivatives are closed out in
advance of the underlying commitment or anticipated transaction, however, the
market value changes may not offset due to the fact that price movement
correlation ceases to exist when the positions are closed, as further
47
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
discussed below. Under such circumstances, gains (losses) are deferred and
recognized as a component of income when the underlying hedged item is
recognized in income.
The average maturity discussed above and the fair value discussed in Note 15
are not necessarily indicative of likely future cash flows as these positions
may be changed by new transactions in the trading portfolio at any time in
response to changing market conditions, market liquidity and the Company's risk
management portfolio needs and strategies. Terms regarding cash settlements of
these contracts vary with respect to the actual timing of cash receipts and
payments.
(c) Trading and Non-trading -- General Policy.
In addition to the risk associated with price movements, credit risk is also
inherent in the Company's risk management activities. Credit risk relates to the
risk of loss resulting from non-performance of contractual obligations by a
counterparty. While as yet the Company has experienced only minor losses due to
the credit risk associated with these arrangements, the Company has off-balance
sheet risk to the extent that the counterparties to these transactions may fail
to perform as required by the terms of each such contract. In order to minimize
this risk, the Company enters into such contracts primarily with counterparties
having a minimum Standard & Poor's or Moody's rating of BBB- or Baa3,
respectively. For long-term arrangements, the Company periodically reviews the
financial condition of such firms in addition to monitoring the effectiveness of
these financial contracts in achieving the Company's objectives. Should the
counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, the Company would seek to
compel performance at law or otherwise obtain compensatory damages in lieu
thereof. The Company might be forced to acquire alternative hedging arrangements
or be required to honor the underlying commitment at then-current market prices.
In such event, the Company might incur additional losses to the extent of
amounts, if any, already paid to the counterparties. In view of its criteria for
selecting counterparties, its process for monitoring the financial strength of
these counterparties and its experience to date in successfully completing these
transactions, the Company believes that the risk of incurring a significant
financial statement loss due to the non-performance of counterparties to these
transactions is minimal.
The Company's policies also prohibit the use of leveraged financial
instruments.
The Company has established a Risk Oversight Committee, comprised of corporate
and business segment officers that oversees all commodity price and credit risk
activities, including the Company's trading, marketing and risk management
activities. The committee's duties are to establish the Company's commodity risk
policies, allocate risk capital within limits established by the Company's board
of directors, approve trading of new products and commodities, monitor risk
positions and ensure compliance with the Company's risk management policies and
procedures and trading limits established by the Company's board of directors.
(6) JOINTLY OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANT
(a) Investment in South Texas Project.
The Company has a 30.8% interest in the South Texas Project, which consists of
two 1,250 megawatt (MW) nuclear generating units and bears a corresponding 30.8%
share of capital and operating costs associated with the project. As of December
31, 1999, the Company's investment in the South Texas Project was $382 million
(net of $2.1 billion accumulated depreciation which includes an impairment loss
recorded in 1999 of $745 million). For additional information regarding the
impairment loss, see Note 3. The Company's investment in nuclear fuel was $44
million (net of $251 million amortization) as of such date.
The South Texas Project is owned as a tenancy in common among its four co-
owners, with each owner retaining its undivided ownership interest in the two
nuclear-fueled generating units and the electrical output from those units. The
four co-owners have delegated management and operating responsibility for the
South Texas Project to the South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company
(STPNOC). STPNOC is managed by a board of
48
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
directors comprised of one director from each of the four owners, along with the
chief executive officer of STPNOC. The four owners provide oversight through an
owners' committee comprised of representatives of each of the owners and through
the board of directors of STPNOC. Prior to November 1997, the Company was the
operator of the South Texas Project.
(b) Nuclear Insurance.
The Company and the other owners of the South Texas Project maintain nuclear
property and nuclear liability insurance coverage as required by law and
periodically review available limits and coverage for additional protection. The
owners of the South Texas Project currently maintain $2.75 billion in property
damage insurance coverage, which is above the legally required minimum, but is
less than the total amount of insurance currently available for such losses.
This coverage consists of $500 million in primary property damage insurance and
excess property insurance in the amount of $2.25 billion. With respect to excess
property insurance, the Company and the other owners of the South Texas Project
are subject to assessments, the maximum aggregate assessment under current
policies being $17 million during any one policy year. The application of the
proceeds of such property insurance is subject to the priorities established by
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations relating to the safety of
licensed reactors and decontamination operations.
Pursuant to the Price Anderson Act, the maximum liability to the public of
owners of nuclear power plants was $8.9 billion as of December 31, 1999. Owners
are required under the Price Anderson Act to insure their liability for nuclear
incidents and protective evacuations by maintaining the maximum amount of
financial protection available from private sources and by maintaining secondary
financial protection through an industry retrospective rating plan. The
assessment of deferred premiums provided by the plan for each nuclear incident
is up to $84 million per reactor, subject to indexing for inflation, a possible
5% surcharge (but no more than $10 million per reactor per incident in any one
year) and a 3% state premium tax. The Company and the other owners of the South
Texas Project currently maintain the required nuclear liability insurance and
participate in the industry retrospective rating plan.
There can be no assurance that all potential losses or liabilities will be
insurable, or that the amount of insurance will be sufficient to cover them. Any
substantial losses not covered by insurance would have a material effect on the
Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
(c) Nuclear Decommissioning.
The Company contributes $14.8 million per year to a trust established to fund
its share of the decommissioning costs for the South Texas Project. For a
discussion of the accounting treatment for the securities held in the Company's
nuclear decommissioning trust, see Note 1(l). In July 1999, an outside
consultant estimated the Company's portion of decommissioning costs to be
approximately $363 million. The consultant's calculation of decommissioning
costs for financial planning purposes used the DECON methodology (prompt
removal/dismantling), one of the three alternatives acceptable to the NRC and
assumed deactivation of Units Nos. 1 and 2 upon the expiration of their 40-year
operating licenses. While the current and projected funding levels currently
exceed minimum NRC requirements, no assurance can be given that the amounts held
in trust will be adequate to cover the actual decommissioning costs of the South
Texas Project. Such costs may vary because of changes in the assumed date of
decommissioning and changes in regulatory requirements, technology and costs of
labor, materials and equipment. Pursuant to the Legislation, costs associated
with nuclear decommissioning that have not been recovered as of January 1, 2002,
will continue to be subject to cost-of-service rate regulation and will be
included in a non-bypassable charge to transmission and distribution customers.
49
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(7) EQUITY INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES TO UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
The Company accounts for investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries under the
equity method of accounting where (i) the ownership interest in the affiliate
ranges from 20% to 50%, (ii) the ownership interest is less than 20% but the
Company exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies of
such affiliate or (iii) the interest in the affiliate exceeds 50% but the
Company does not exercise control over the affiliate.
The Company's equity investments and advances in unconsolidated subsidiaries
at December 31, 1999 and 1998 were $1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
The Company's equity loss from these investments, was $14 million in 1999. For
1998 and 1997, the Company's equity income from these investments was $71
million and $49 million, respectively. Dividends received from these
investments amounted to $14 million, $44 million and $46 million in 1999, 1998
and 1997, respectively.
(a) Reliant Energy Latin America.
Reliant Energy is evaluating the sale of the Company's Latin American assets
in order to pursue business opportunities that are in line with its strategies
for the U.S. and Western Europe.
As of December 31, 1999, Reliant Energy Latin America indirectly holds
interests in Light Servicos de Eletricidade S.A. (Light) (11.78%) which
transmits and distributes electricity in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil and holds 77.81%
of the common stock of Metropolitana Electricidade de Sao Paulo S.A.
(Metropolitana) which transmits and distributes electricity in Sao Paulo,
Brazil; three Colombian electric systems, Empresa de Energia del Pacifico
S.A.E.S.P. (EPSA) (28.35%), Electricaribe (34.61%), and Electrocosta (35.17%);
and three electric systems in El Salvador (ranging from approximately 37% to
45%). In addition, Reliant Energy Latin America indirectly holds interests in
natural gas systems in Colombia and a power generation plant in India.
As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, Light and Metropolitana had total borrowings
of $2.9 billion and $3.2 billion denominated in non-local currencies. During
the first quarter of 1999, the Brazilian real was devalued and allowed to float
against other major currencies. The effects of devaluation on the non-local
currency denominated borrowings caused the Company to record, as a component of
its equity earnings, an after-tax charge for the year ended December 31, 1999 of
$102 million as a result of foreign currency transaction losses recorded by both
Light and Metropolitana. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, one U.S. dollar could be
exchanged for 1.79 Brazilian real and 1.21 Brazilian real, respectively.
Because the Company uses the Brazilian real as the functional currency to report
Light's equity earnings, any decrease in the value of the Brazilian real below
its December 31, 1999 level will increase Light's liability represented by the
non-local currency denominated borrowings. This amount will also be reflected
in the Company's consolidated earnings, to the extent of the Company's ownership
interest in Light. Similarly, any increase in the value of the Brazilian real
above its December 31, 1999 level will decrease Light's liability represented by
such borrowings.
In April 1998, Light purchased 74.88% of the common stock of Metropolitana.
The purchase price for the shares was approximately $1.8 billion and was
financed with proceeds from bank borrowings. In August 1998, Reliant Energy
Latin America and another unrelated entity jointly acquired, through
subsidiaries, 65% of the stock of two Colombian electric distribution companies,
Electricaribe and Electrocosta, for approximately $522 million. The shares of
these companies are indirectly held by an offshore holding company jointly owned
by the Company and the other entity. In addition, in 1998, the Company
acquired, for approximately $150 million, equity interests in three electric
distribution systems located in El Salvador.
In June 1997, a consortium of investors which included Reliant Energy Latin
America acquired for $496 million a 56.7% controlling ownership interest in
EPSA. Reliant Energy Latin America contributed $152 million of the purchase
price for a 28.35% ownership interest in EPSA.
50
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
In May 1997, Reliant Energy Latin America increased its indirect ownership
interest in an Argentine electric utility from 48% to 63%. The purchase price
of the additional interest was $28 million. On June 30, 1998, Reliant Energy
Latin America sold its 63% ownership interest in this Argentine affiliate and
certain related assets for approximately $243 million. Reliant Energy Latin
America acquired its initial ownership interests in the electric utility in
1992. The Company recorded an $80 million after-tax gain from this sale in the
second quarter of 1998.
(b) Wholesale Energy Domestic.
In April 1998, the Company formed a limited liability corporation to construct
and operate a 490 MW electric generation plant in Boulder City, Nevada in which
the Company retained a 50% interest. The plant is anticipated to be operational
in the second quarter of 2000. In October 1998, the Company entered into a
partnership to construct and operate a 100 MW cogeneration plant in Orange,
Texas in which its ownership interest is 50%. The plant began commercial
operation in December 1999. As of December 31, 1999, the Company's net
investment in these projects is $78 million and its total projected net
investment is approximately $90 million.
(c) Combined Financial Statement Data of Equity Investees and Advances to
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries.
The following tables set forth certain summarized financial information of the
Company's unconsolidated affiliates as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the
years then ended or periods from the respective affiliates' acquisition date
through December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, if shorter:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income Statement:
Revenues.......................................... $4,421,942 $2,449,335 $2,011,927
Operating expenses................................ 3,329,559 1,762,166 1,460,248
Net income........................................ (310,667) 514,005 403,323
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
---------------------- ----------------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet:
Current assets.................................................... $ 1,553,166 $ 1,841,857
Noncurrent assets................................................. 10,379,306 13,643,747
Current liabilities............................................... 2,714,621 4,074,603
Noncurrent liabilities............................................ 4,440,985 6,284,821
Owners' equity.................................................... 4,776,866 5,126,180
</TABLE>
(8) INDEXED DEBT SECURITIES (ACES AND ZENS) AND TIME WARNER SECURITIES
(a) Original investment in Time Warner Securities.
On July 6, 1999, the Company converted its 11 million shares of Time Warner
Inc. (TW) convertible preferred stock (TW Preferred) into 45.8 million shares of
Time Warner common stock (TW Common). Prior to the conversion, the Company's
investment in the TW Preferred was accounted for under the cost method at a
value of $990 million in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The TW
Preferred was redeemable after July 6, 2000, had an aggregate liquidation
preference of $100 per share (plus accrued and unpaid dividends), was entitled
to annual dividends of $3.75 per share until July 6, 1999 and was convertible by
the Company. The Company recorded pre-tax dividend income with respect to the
TW Preferred of $20.6 million in 1999 prior to the conversion and $41.3 million
in both 1998 and 1997. Due to the conversion, the Company will no longer
receive the quarterly pre-tax dividend of $10.3 million that was paid on the TW
Preferred but will receive dividends, if declared and paid,
51
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
on its investments in TW Common. Effective on the conversion date, the shares of
TW Common were classified as trading securities under SFAS No. 115 and an
unrealized gain was recorded in the amount of $2.4 billion ($1.5 billion after
tax) to reflect the cumulative appreciation in the fair value of the Company's
investment in Time Warner securities.
(b) ACES.
In July 1997, in order to monetize a portion of the cash value of its
investment in TW Preferred, the Company issued 22.9 million of its unsecured 7%
Automatic Common Exchange Securities (ACES) having an original principal amount
of approximately $1.052 billion. The market value of ACES is indexed to the
market value of TW Common. In July 2000, the ACES will be mandatorily
exchangeable for, at the Company's option, either shares of TW Common at the
exchange rate set forth below or cash with an equal value. The current exchange
rate is as follows:
Market Price of TW Common Exchange Rate
-------------------------- -------------
Below $22.96875 2.0 shares of TW Common
$22.96875 - $27.7922 Share equivalent of $45.9375
Above $27.7922 1.6528 shares of TW Common
Prior to maturity, the Company has the option of redeeming the ACES if (i)
changes in federal tax regulations require recognition of a taxable gain on the
Company's TW investment and (ii) the Company could defer such gain by redeeming
the ACES. The redemption price is 105% of the closing sales price of the ACES as
determined over a period prior to the day redemption notice is given. The
redemption price may be paid in cash or in shares of TW Common or a combination
of the two.
By issuing the ACES, the Company effectively eliminated the economic exposure
of its investment in TW securities to decreases in the price of TW Common below
$22.96875. In addition, the Company retained 100% of any increase in TW Common
price up to $27.7922 per share and 17% of any increase in market price above
$27.7922.
Prior to the July 1999 conversion of the TW Preferred, any increase in the
market value of TW Common above $27.7922 was treated for accounting purposes as
an increase in the payment amount of the ACES equal to 83% of the increase in
the market price per share and was recorded by the Company as a non-cash
expense. As a result, the Company recorded in 1999 (prior to conversion), 1998
and 1997 a non-cash, unrealized accounting loss of $435 million, $1.2 billion
and $121 million, respectively (which resulted in an after-tax earnings
reduction of $283 million, or $0.99 per share, $764 million, or $2.69 per share,
and $79 million, or $0.31 per share, respectively). Following the conversion of
TW Preferred into TW Common, changes in the market value of the Company's TW
Common and the related offsetting changes in the liability related to the
Company's obligation under the ACES will be recorded in the Company's Statement
of Consolidated Income.
(c) ZENS.
On September 21, 1999, the Company issued approximately 17.2 million of its
2.0% Zero-Premium Exchangeable Subordinated Notes due 2029 (ZENS) having an
original principal amount of approximately $1.0 billion. At maturity the
holders of the ZENS will receive in cash the higher of the original principal
amount of the ZENS or an amount based on the then-current market value of TW
Common, or other securities distributed with respect to TW Common (one share of
TW Common and such other securities, if any, are referred to as reference
shares). Each ZENS has an original principal amount of $58.25 (the closing
market price of the TW Common on September 15, 1999) and is exchangeable at any
time at the option of the holder for cash equal to 95% (100% in certain cases)
of the market value of the reference shares attributable to one ZENS. The
Company pays interest on each ZENS at an annual rate of 2% plus the amount of
any quarterly cash dividends paid in respect of the quarterly
52
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
interest period on the reference shares attributable to each ZENS. Subject to
certain conditions, the Company has the right to defer interest payments from
time to time on the ZENS for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods. As of
December 31, 1999, no interest payments on the ZENS had been deferred.
Of the $980 million net proceeds from the offering, the Company used $443
million for general corporate purposes, including repayment of Company
indebtedness. The Company used $537 million of the net proceeds to purchase 9.2
million shares of TW Common, which are classified as trading securities under
SFAS No. 115. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the market
value of the TW Common are recorded in the Company's Statements of Consolidated
Income.
An increase above $58.25 (subject to certain adjustments) in the market value
per share of TW Common results in an increase in the Company's liability for the
ZENS and is recorded by the Company as a non-cash expense. If the market value
per share of TW Common declines below $58.25 (subject to certain adjustments),
the liability for the ZENS would not decline below the original principal
amount. However, the decline in market value of the Company's investment in the
TW Common would be recorded as an unrealized loss as discussed above.
Prior to the purchase of additional shares of TW Common on September 21, 1999,
the Company owned approximately 8 million shares of TW Common that were in
excess of the 38 million shares needed to economically hedge its ACES
obligation. For the period from July 6, 1999 to the ZENS issuance date, losses
(due to the decline in the market value of the TW Common during such period) on
these 8 million shares were $122 million ($79 million after tax). The 8 million
shares of TW Common combined with the additional 9.2 million shares purchased
are expected to be held to facilitate the Company's ability to meet its
obligation under the ZENS.
The following table sets forth certain summarized financial information of the
Company's investment in TW securities and the Company's ACES and ZENS
obligations.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TW Investment ACES ZENS
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1997............................ $ 990,000
Issuance of indexed debt securities................... $ 1,052,384
Loss on indexed debt securities....................... 121,402
----------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1997.......................... 990,000 1,173,786
Loss on indexed debt securities....................... 1,176,211
----------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1998.......................... 990,000 2,349,997
Issuance of indexed debt securities................... $ 1,000,000
Purchase of TW Common................................. 537,055
Loss on indexed debt securities....................... 388,107 241,416
Gain on TW Common..................................... 2,452,406
----------- ----------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1999.......................... $ 3,979,461 $ 2,738,104 $ 1,241,416
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
(9) PREFERRED STOCK AND PREFERENCE STOCK
(a) Preferred Stock.
At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had 10,000,000 authorized shares of
cumulative preferred stock, of which 97,397 shares were outstanding. As of such
dates, the Company's only outstanding series of preferred stock was its $4.00
Preferred Stock. The $4.00 Preferred Stock pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per
share, is redeemable at $105 per share and has a liquidation price of $100 per
share.
53
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(b) Preference Stock.
At December 31, 1999 and 1998, Reliant Energy had 10,000,000 authorized shares
of preference stock which were designated and outstanding, as shown below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1999 DECEMBER 31, 1998
-------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
LIQUIDATION VALUE SHARES SHARES SHARES SHARES
PER SHARE DESIGNATED OUTSTANDING DESIGNATED OUTSTANDING
-------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Series A..... $ 1,000 700,000 700,000
Series B..... $100,000 27,000 17,000 27,000 17,000
Series C..... $100,000 1,575 1,575 1,575
Series D..... Euro 100,000(1) 5,880 5,880
Series E..... $100,000 3,160 3,160
Series F..... $100,000 2,400 2,400
</TABLE>
____________
(1) As of December 31, 1999, one U.S. dollar could be exchanged for 1.0062
Euros.
The Series A Preference Stock is issuable in accordance with the Company's
Shareholder Rights Agreement upon the occurrence of certain events. Each share
of common stock of the Company includes one associated preference stock purchase
right (Company Right). Under certain circumstances, each Company Right entitles
the registered holder to purchase from the Company a unit consisting of one-
thousandth of a share (Fractional Share) of Series A Preference Stock, without
par value, at a purchase price of $42.50 per Fractional Share, subject to
adjustments.
The Series C Preference Stock was redeemed in March 1999. The Series B, D, E
and F Preference Stock are not deemed outstanding for financial reporting
purposes because the sole holders of each series are wholly owned financing
subsidiaries of the Company.
54
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(10) LONG-TERM DEBT AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
--------------------------- --------------------------
Long-Term Current (1) Long-Term Current(1)
---------- ----------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Thousands of Dollars)
Short-term borrowings:
Commercial paper..................................................... $1,793,268 $1,360,239
Lines of credit (2).................................................. 563,472 150,000
Receivables facilities............................................... 350,000 300,000
Other (3)............................................................ 172,471 2,500
---------- ---------
Total short-term borrowings........................................... 2,879,211 1,812,739
---------- ----------
Long-term debt:
Reliant Energy
ACES (4)............................................................. 2,738,104 $2,349,997
ZENS (4)............................................................. 1,241,416
Debentures........................................................... $ 350,000 350,000
7.88% to 9.38% due 2001 to 2002 as of December 31, 1999 and 1998
First mortgage bonds................................................. 1,261,217 150,000 1,875,732 170,500
4.90% to 9.15% due 2002 to 2027 as of December 31, 1999
4.90% to 9.15% due 2000 to 2027 as of December 31, 1998
Pollution control bonds.............................................. 1,045,900 581,385
4.70% to 5.95% due 2011 to 2030 as of December 31, 1999
4.90% to 5.25% due 2015 to 2029 as of December 31, 1998
Notes payable........................................................ 529 31 561 31
12.50% due 2017 as of December 31, 1999 and 1998
Capitalized lease obligations........................................ 12,502 1,229 13,742 1,140
Financing Subsidiaries (directly or indirectly held by Reliant Energy)
Notes payable........................................................ 525,000
7.12% to 7.40% due 2001 to 2002 as of December 31, 1999
Reliant Energy International, Inc.
Notes payable, 9.00% due 2003 as of December 31, 1999 and 1998....... 92,667 27,905 126,522 22,345
Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc.
Notes payable........................................................ 70,247
Various market rates due 2002 as of December 31, 1999
N.V. UNA (3)(5)
Debentures........................................................... 390,626
3.50% to 9.13% due 2000 to 2010 as of December 31, 1999
Resources Corp. (5)
Convertible debentures............................................... 92,727 104,617
6.0% due 2012
Debentures........................................................... 961,545 1,010,919
6.38% to 8.90% due 2003 to 2008 as of December 31, 1999
6.38% to 10.00% due 2003 to 2019 as of December 31, 1998
Medium-term notes.................................................... 150,275 177,591
8.77% to 9.23% maturing 2001 as of December 31, 1999
8.77% to 9.39% maturing 2000 to 2001 as of December 31, 1998
Notes payable........................................................ 223,451 203,116 203,438
7.50% to 9.39% due 2000 as of December 31, 1999
7.50% to 8.88% due 1999 to 2000 as of December 31, 1998
Unamortized discount and premium...................................... 8,075 6,566
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total long-term borrowings............................................ 4,961,310 4,382,136 6,800,748 397,454
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total borrowings..................................................... $4,961,310 $7,261,347 $6,800,748 $2,210,193
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
_____________________________________
(1) Includes amounts due within one year of the date noted.
(2) Includes borrowings which are denominated in Euros as of December 31, 1999.
The assumed exchange rate is 1.0062 Euros per U.S. dollar (exchange rate on
December 31, 1999).
(3) Borrowings are primarily denominated in Dutch guilders. The assumed
exchange rate is 2.19 NLG per U.S. dollar (exchange rate on December 31,
1999).
(4) For additional information regarding ACES and ZENS, see Note 8. As ZENS
are exchangeable at any time at the option of the holders, these notes are
classified as a current portion of long-term debt.
(5) At the respective acquisition dates of UNA and Resources, the debt was
adjusted to fair market value as of that date. Included in unamortized
premium and discount is unamortized premium related to fair value
adjustments
55
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
of-long-term debt of approximately $48 million and $33 million at December
31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, and is being amortized over the respective
remaining term of the related long-term debt.
(a) Short-term Borrowings.
As of December 31, 1999, the Company has credit facilities, which included
facilities of various financing subsidiaries, UNA and Resources Corp., with
financial institutions which provide for an aggregate of $3.7 billion in
committed credit. The facilities expire as follows: $1.8 billion in 2000,
$1.6 billion in 2002 and $0.3 billion in 2003. Interest rates on borrowings
are based on the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) plus a margin, Euro
interbank deposits plus a margin, a base rate or at a rate determined through a
bidding process. Credit facilities aggregating $1.2 billion are unsecured.
These credit facilities contain covenants and requirements which must be met to
borrow funds. Such covenants are not anticipated to materially restrict the
Company from borrowing funds under such facilities. As of December 31, 1999,
unused credit facilities totaled $1.0 billion. In addition, one of the credit
facilities includes a $65 million sub-facility under which letters of credit
may be obtained. Letters of credit under the sub-facility aggregated
$9.3 million as of December 31, 1999.
The Company sells commercial paper to provide financing for general corporate
purposes. As of December 31, 1999, $1.8 billion of commercial paper was
outstanding. The commercial paper borrowings are supported by various credit
facilities discussed above including a $1.6 billion revolving credit facility
expiring in 2002, a $200 million revolving credit facility expiring in 2000 and
a $350 million revolving credit facility expiring in 2003.
As of December 31, 1999, the Company, through UNA, has $170 million (assuming
an exchange rate of 2.19 NLG per U.S. dollar, exchange rate as of December 31,
1999) of short-term borrowings arranged via brokers or directly from financial
institutions. These borrowings are used by UNA to meet its short-term liquidity
requirements.
The weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings in 1999, 1998 and
1997 was 5.84%, 5.77% and 6.12%, respectively.
(b) Long-term Debt.
Maturities of long-term debt and sinking fund requirements for the Company are
approximately $409 million in 2000, $773 million in 2001, $670 million in 2002,
$741 million in 2003 and $58 million in 2004. Maturities in 2000 exclude
indexed debt securities (see Note 8) which may be settled with the Company's
investment in TW Common.
Substantially all physical assets used in the conduct of the business and
operations of Electric Operations are subject to liens securing the First
Mortgage Bonds. Sinking fund requirements on the First Mortgage Bonds may be
satisfied by certification of property additions at 100% of the requirements as
defined by the Mortgage and Deed of Trust. Sinking or improvement/replacement
fund requirements for 1999 and prior years have been satisfied by certification
of property additions. The replacement fund requirement to be satisfied in 2000
is approximately $327 million.
At December 31, 1999, Resources Corp. had issued and outstanding $92.7 million
aggregate principal amount of its 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due
2012 (Subordinated Debentures). The holders of the Subordinated Debentures
receive interest quarterly and have the right at any time on or before the
maturity date thereof to convert each Subordinated Debenture into 0.65 shares of
Company common stock and $14.24 in cash. During 1999, Resources Corp. purchased
$12.0 million aggregate principal amount of its Subordinated Debentures.
In November 1998, Resources Corp. issued $500 million aggregate principal
amount of its 6 3/8% Term Enhanced ReMarketable Securities (TERM Notes).
Included within the TERM Notes is an embedded option sold to an investment bank
which gives the investment bank the right to remarket the TERM Notes commencing
in November 2003 if it chooses to exercise the option. The TERM Notes are
unsecured obligations of Resources Corp.
56
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
which bear interest at an annual rate of 6 3/8% through November 1, 2003. On
November 1, 2003, the holders of the TERM Notes are required to tender their
notes at 100% of their principal amount. The portion of the proceeds
attributable to the option premium will be amortized over the stated term of the
securities. If the option is not exercised by the investment bank, Resources
Corp. will repurchase the TERM Notes at 100% of their principal amount on
November 1, 2003. If the option is exercised, the TERM Notes will be remarketed
on a date, selected by Resources Corp., within the 52-week period beginning
November 1, 2003. During such period and prior to remarketing, the TERM Notes
will bear interest at rates, adjusted weekly, based on an index selected by
Resources Corp. If the TERM Notes are remarketed, the final maturity date of the
TERM Notes will be November 1, 2013, subject to adjustment, and the effective
interest rate on the remarketed TERM Notes will be 5.66% plus Resources Corp.'s
applicable credit spread at the time of such remarketing.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company capitalized
interest of $19 million, $14 million and $11 million, respectively, including
allowance for funds used during construction related to debt.
During the year ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company recorded
losses from the extinguishment of debt of $22 million, $20 million and $17
million, respectively. As these costs will be recovered through regulated cash
flows, these costs have been deferred and a regulatory asset has been recorded.
For further discussion regarding the accounting, see Note 3.
(11) TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
In February 1999, Reliant Energy and two newly created and wholly owned
Delaware statutory business trusts (REI Trust I and REI Trust II), registered
$500 million of trust preferred securities and related junior subordinated debt
securities. In February 1999, REI Trust I issued $375 million aggregate amount
of preferred securities to the public. The trust preferred securities
accumulate distributions at a rate of 7.20% payable quarterly in arrears, have a
stated liquidation amount of $25 per preferred security and must be redeemed by
March 2048. REI Trust I used the proceeds to purchase $375 million aggregate
principal amount of junior subordinated debentures from the Company having an
interest rate and maturity date that correspond to the distribution rate and
mandatory redemption date of the trust preferred securities. The Company used
the proceeds from the sale of the debentures for general corporate purposes,
including the repayment of short-term debt. Under the registration statement,
$125 million of these securities remain available for issuance. The issuance of
all securities registered by the Company is subject to market and other
conditions.
In February 1997, two Delaware statutory business trusts established by the
Company (HL&P Capital Trust I and HL&P Capital Trust II) issued (i) $250 million
of trust preferred securities and (ii) $100 million of capital securities,
respectively. The trust preferred securities have a distribution rate of 8.125%
payable quarterly in arrears, a stated liquidation amount of $25 per trust
preferred security and must be redeemed by March 2046. The capital securities
have a distribution rate of 8.257% payable quarterly in arrears, a stated
liquidation amount of $1,000 per capital security and must be redeemed by
February 2037. HL&P Capital Trust I and II used the proceeds to purchase $350
million aggregate principal amount of subordinated debentures from the Company
having interest rates and maturity dates that correspond to the distribution
rate and the mandatory redemption dates of the trust preferred securities.
The Company accounts for HL&P Capital Trust I and II and REI Trust I as wholly
owned consolidated subsidiaries. The subordinated debentures are the trusts'
sole asset and their entire operations. The Company has fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, all of HL&P Capital Trust I
and II and REI Trust I's obligations with respect to the preferred securities
and capital securities. The preferred securities and capital securities are
mandatorily redeemable upon the repayment of the subordinated debentures at
their stated maturity or earlier redemption. Subject to certain limitations,
the Company has the option of deferring payments of interest on the subordinated
debentures. During any deferral or event of default, the Company may not pay
dividends on its capital stock. As of December 31, 1999, no interest payments on
the subordinated debentures had been deferred.
57
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
In June 1996, a Delaware statutory business trust established by Resources
Corp. (Resources Trust) issued $172.5 million of convertible preferred
securities to the public. The convertible preferred securities have a
distribution rate of 6.25% payable quarterly in arrears, a stated liquidation
amount of $50 per convertible preferred security and must be redeemed by 2026.
The Resources Trust used the proceeds to purchase $172.5 million of 6.25%
convertible junior subordinated debentures from Resources Corp. having an
interest rate and a maturity date that correspond to the distribution rate and
the mandatory redemption date of the convertible preferred securities.
Resources Corp. accounts for Resources Trust as a wholly owned consolidated
subsidiary. The convertible junior subordinated debentures represent Resources
Trust's sole assets and its entire operations. Resources Corp. has fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, all of Resources Trust's
obligations with respect to the convertible preferred securities. The
convertible preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon the repayment
of the convertible junior subordinated debentures at their stated maturity or
earlier redemption. Each convertible preferred security is convertible at the
option of the holder into $33.62 of cash and 1.55 shares of Reliant Energy
common stock. During 1999 and 1998, convertible preferred securities
aggregating $0.2 million and $15.5 million, respectively, were converted,
leaving $0.7 million and $0.9 million liquidation amount of convertible
preferred securities outstanding at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Subject to certain limitations, Resources Corp. has the option of deferring
payments of interest on the convertible junior subordinated debentures. During
any deferral or event of default, Resources Corp. may not pay dividends on its
common stock to Reliant Energy. As of December 31, 1999, no interest payments on
the debentures had been deferred.
(12) STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS AND RETIREMENT PLANS
(a) Incentive Compensation Plans.
The Company has Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans (LICP) and other
incentive compensation plans that provide for the issuance of stock-based
incentives (including performance-based stock compensation, restricted shares,
stock options and stock appreciation rights) to key employees of the Company,
including officers. As of December 31, 1999, 485 current and former employees
participated in the plans. A maximum of approximately 24 million shares of
common stock may be issued under these plans. Under the LICP, beginning one year
after the grant date, the options become exercisable in one-third increments
each year. As of December 31, 1999, the weighted-average remaining contractual
life of outstanding options was 8.3 years. Performance-based stock compensation
issued and restricted shares granted were 294,271 in 1999, 98,413 in 1998 and
704,865 in 1997.
58
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Stock option activity for the years 1997 through 1999 is summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER PRICE AT DATE OF
OF SHARES GRANT OR EXERCISE
--------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at December 31, 1996......................................... 498,652 $21.7796
Options granted......................................................... 382,954 $21.0673
Options converted at acquisition(1)..................................... 622,504 $12.9002
Options exercised(1).................................................... (281,053) $ 9.2063
Options withheld for taxes.............................................. (72)
Options canceled........................................................ (148,418)
---------
Outstanding at December 31, 1997......................................... 1,074,567 $19.0728
---------
Options granted......................................................... 2,243,535 $26.3112
Options exercised(1).................................................... (287,591) $15.6576
Options withheld for taxes.............................................. (6,854)
Options canceled........................................................ (78,003)
----------
Outstanding at December 31, 1998......................................... 2,945,654 $24.8668
----------
Options granted......................................................... 3,806,051 $26.7372
Options exercised(1).................................................... (83,610) $19.3819
Options canceled........................................................ (205,124)
----------
Outstanding at December 31, 1999......................................... 6,462,971 $25.9937
==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER
OF SHARES
----------------
December 31, 1999
Exercisable at:
<S> <C>
$7.00 - 19.84................................................................................. 147,953
$21.01 - 30.25................................................................................ 1,202,421
December 31, 1998
Exercisable at:
$7.00 - 19.84................................................................................. 158,695
$20.01 - 35.18................................................................................ 373,160
December 31, 1997
Exercisable at:
$7.00 - 17.75................................................................................. 302,256
$20.01 - 35.18................................................................................ 343,048
</TABLE>
__________
(1) Effective upon the Merger with Resources Corp., each holder of an unexpired
Resources Corp. stock option, whether or not then exercisable, was entitled
to elect to either (i) have all or any portion of their Resources Corp.
stock options canceled and "cashed out" or (ii) have all or any portion of
their Resources Corp. stock options converted to Reliant Energy's stock
options. There were 828,297 Resources Corp. stock options converted into
622,504 of Reliant Energy's stock options at the Merger date. Options
exercised during 1999, 1998 and 1997 included approximately 26,000, 210,000
and 277,000 shares, respectively, related to Resources Corp. stock options
which were converted at the Merger.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"
the Company applies the rules contained in Accounting Principles Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and discloses the required pro forma
effect on net income and earnings per share of the fair value based method of
accounting for stock compensation as required by SFAS No. 123.
59
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The following pro forma summary of the Company's consolidated results of
operations has been prepared as if the fair value based method of accounting for
employee stock compensation had been applied:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
--------------- --------------- ---------------
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders as reported.... $ 1,482,081 $ (141,482) $ 420,948
SFAS No. 123 effect.................................................. (5,120) (6,383) (2,374)
----------- ---------- ---------
Pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders...... $ 1,476,961 $ (147,865) $ 418,574
=========== ========== =========
Pro forma basic earnings per share................................... $ 5.18 $ (.50) $ 1.66
Pro forma diluted earnings per share................................. 5.16 (.52) 1.65
</TABLE>
The fair value of options granted during 1999, 1998 and 1997 was calculated
using the Black-Scholes model. The significant assumptions incorporated in the
Black-Scholes model in estimating the fair value of the options include (i) an
interest rate of 5.10%, 5.65% and 6.58% for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively,
that represents the interest rate on a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity
date corresponding with the option term, (ii) an option term of ten years,
(iii) volatility of 21.23%, 24.01% and 22.06% for 1999, 1998 and 1997,
respectively, calculated using daily stock prices for the period prior to the
grant date and (iv) expected common dividends of $1.50 per share representing
annualized dividends at the date of grant.
(b) Pension.
The Company has a noncontributory retirement plan which covers the employees
of the Company. Prior to 1999, Resources had two noncontributory retirement
plans: (i) the plan which covered the employees of Resources other than
Minnegasco employees and (ii) the plan which covered Minnegasco employees. The
plans provided retirement benefits based on years of service and compensation.
Effective January 1, 1999, the two Resources noncontributory retirement plans
were merged into the Company's plan. The Company's funding policy is to review
amounts annually in accordance with applicable regulations in order to achieve
adequate funding of projected benefit obligations. The assets of the plan
consist principally of common stocks and high-quality, interest-bearing
obligations. The net periodic pension costs, prepaid pension costs and benefit
obligation have been determined separately for each plan prior to the plans
being merged.
Net pension cost for the Company includes the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost -- benefits earned during the period.................... $ 33,700 $ 33,436 $ 26,848
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation........................ 88,393 85,132 67,641
Expected return on plan assets....................................... (140,496) (121,196) (86,372)
Net amortization..................................................... (5,361) 6 6
--------- --------- --------
Net pension cost................................................ (23,764) (2,622) 8,123
Transfer of obligation to STPNOC..................................... (6,077)
SFAS No. 88 -- curtailment expense................................... 12,947
--------- --------- --------
Total pension cost (benefit).................................... $ (23,764) $ (2,622) $ 14,993
========= ========= ========
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Following are reconciliations of the Company's beginning and ending balances
of its retirement plan benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status for
1999 and 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
1999 1998
-------------------- --------------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION
Benefit obligation, beginning of year................................... $ 1,389,444 $ 1,246,582
Service cost............................................................ 33,700 33,436
Interest cost........................................................... 88,393 85,132
Benefits paid........................................................... (97,946) (69,182)
Plan amendments......................................................... (161,326)
Actuarial (gain) loss................................................... (181,548) 254,802
----------- -----------
Benefit obligation, end of year......................................... $ 1,232,043 $ 1,389,444
=========== ===========
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS
Plan asset, beginning of year........................................... $ 1,429,882 $ 1,304,023
Benefits paid........................................................... (97,946) (69,182)
Employer contributions.................................................. 47,406
Actual investment return................................................ 181,177 147,635
----------- -----------
Plan assets, end of year................................................ $ 1,513,113 $ 1,429,882
=========== ===========
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDED STATUS
Funded status........................................................... $ 281,070 $ 40,438
Unrecognized transition asset........................................... (5,401) (7,205)
Unrecognized prior service cost......................................... (137,950) (148,400)
Unrecognized actuarial loss............................................. 11,742 240,864
---------- -----------
Net amount recognized................................................... $ 149,461 $ 125,697
========== ===========
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
Discount rate........................................................... 7.5% 6.5%
Rate of increase in compensation levels................................. 3.5 - 5.5% 3.5 - 5.5%
Expected long-term rate of return on assets............................. 10.0% 10.0%
</TABLE>
The transitional asset at January 1, 1986, is being recognized over
approximately 17 years, and the prior service cost is being recognized over
approximately 15 years for the Company's plan. The unrecognized transitional
asset, prior service cost and net (gain) or loss related to the Resources' plans
were recognized at the Merger date.
In 1998, the Company's board of directors approved the amendment and
restatement of the retirement plan, effective January 1, 1999, which converted
the present value of the accrued benefits under the existing pension plans into
a cash balance pension plan. Under the cash balance formula, each participant
has an account, for recordkeeping purposes only, to which credits are allocated
annually based on a percentage of the participant's pay. The applicable
percentage for 1999 is 4%. The purpose of the plan change is to continue to
provide uniform retirement income benefits across all employee groups, which are
competitive both within the energy services industry as well as with other
companies within the United States. The Company will continue to reflect the
costs of the pension plan according to the provisions of SFAS No. 87,
"Employers' Accounting for Pensions" as amended. As a result of the January 1,
1999 amendment and restatement, which is reflected in the December 31, 1998
disclosure, the Company's projected benefit obligation declined $161 million.
The actuarial gains and losses are due to changes in certain actuarial
assumptions.
61
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
In addition to the noncontributory plans discussed above, the Company
maintains a non-qualified plan which allows participants to retain the benefits
to which they would have been entitled under the Company's noncontributory plan
except for the federally mandated limits on such benefits or on the level of
salary on which such benefits may be calculated. Prior to 1999, Resources
maintained certain similar non-qualified plans. Effective January 1, 1999,
Resources' non-qualified plans were merged into Reliant Energy's non-qualified
plan. The related benefit obligation at December 31, 1999 and 1998, was $28
million and $26 million, respectively. Expense of approximately $5 million
associated with these non-qualified plans was recorded each year during 1999,
1998 and 1997, respectively.
(c) Savings Plan.
Reliant Energy has an employee savings plan that qualifies as cash or deferred
arrangements under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (IRC). Under the plan, participating employees may contribute a portion
of their compensation, pre-tax or after-tax, up to a maximum of 16% of
compensation. In 1999, the savings plan was amended so that Reliant Energy now
matches 75% to 125% of the first 6% of each employee's compensation contributed,
subject to a vesting schedule, based on certain performance goals achieved by
the Company. Through 1998, Reliant Energy matched 70% of the first 6% of each
employee's compensation contributed, subject to a vesting schedule.
Substantially all of Reliant Energy's match is invested in Reliant Energy common
stock.
In October 1990, Reliant Energy amended its savings plan to add a leveraged
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) component. Reliant Energy may use ESOP
shares to satisfy its obligation to make matching contributions under the
savings plan. Debt service on the ESOP loan is paid using all dividends on
shares in the ESOP, interest earnings on funds held in the ESOP and cash
contributions by Reliant Energy. Shares of Reliant Energy common stock are
released from the encumbrance of the ESOP loan based on the proportion of debt
service paid during the period.
The Company recognizes benefit expense for the ESOP equal to the fair value of
the ESOP shares committed to be released. The Company credits to unearned ESOP
shares the original purchase price of ESOP shares committed to be released to
plan participants with the difference between the fair value of the shares and
the original purchase price recorded to common stock. Dividends on allocated
ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction to retained earnings; dividends on
unallocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of debt or accrued interest
on the ESOP loan.
The ESOP shares were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------------------------------
1999 1998
-------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Allocated shares transferred/distributed from the savings plan............. 2,115,536 1,916,508
Allocated shares........................................................... 5,967,159 5,171,613
Unearned shares............................................................ 10,679,489 11,674,063
------------- -------------
Total original ESOP shares............................................ 18,762,184 18,762,184
============= =============
Fair value of unearned ESOP shares......................................... $ 244,293,311 $ 374,270,460
</TABLE>
Prior to April 1, 1999, Resources had an employee savings plan that covered
substantially all Resources employees other than Reliant Energy Minnegasco
employees. Under the terms of the Resources savings plan, employees could
contribute up to 12% of total compensation in 1998 and 1997, which contributions
up to 6% were matched by the Company. Beginning January 1, 1999, employees
could contribute up to 16% of total compensation, which contributions up to 6%
were matched by the Company. Prior to April 1, 1999, the Reliant Energy
Minnegasco employees were covered by a savings plan, the terms of which were
somewhat similar to the Resources savings plan. Effective April 1, 1999, the
Resources and the Reliant Energy Minnegasco savings plans were merged into the
Company's savings plan.
62
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The Company's savings plan benefit expense was $26 million, $25million and $22
million in 1999, 1998, and 1997, respectively.
(d) Postretirement Benefits.
The Company records the liability for postretirement benefit plans other than
pensions (primarily health care) under SFAS No. 106, "Employer's Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" (SFAS No. 106). The Company is
amortizing over a 22 year period approximately $213 million to cover the
"transition cost" of adopting SFAS No. 106 (i.e., the Company's liability for
postretirement benefits payable with respect to employee service years accrued
prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 106). The unrecognized transitional asset and
net (gain) loss related to the Resources plans were recognized at the Merger
date.
As provided in the 1995 Rate Case Settlement, Reliant Energy HL&P is required
to fund during each year in an irrevocable external trust approximately $22
million of postretirement benefit costs which are included in its rates. Reliant
Energy Minnegasco is required to fund postretirement benefit costs for the
amount included in its rates. The Company, excluding Reliant Energy HL&P and
Reliant Energy Minnegasco, will continue funding its postretirement benefits on
a pay-as-you-go basis.
Net postretirement benefit cost for the Company includes the following
components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998 1997
----------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Thousands of Dollars)
Service cost -- benefits earned during the period........ $ 5,073 $ 8,060 $ 8,927
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation............ 26,259 17,270 14,176
Expected (return) loss on plan assets.................... (8,986) (5,977) (4,515)
Net amortization......................................... 14,629 3,298 4,011
-------- -------- --------
Net postretirement benefit cost........................ 36,975 22,651 22,599
Transfer of obligation to STPNOC......................... 173
-------- -------- --------
Total cost............................................. $ 36,975 $ 22,651 $ 22,772
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Following are reconciliations of the Company's beginning and ending balances
of its postretirement benefit plans benefit obligation, plan assets and funded
status for 1999 and 1998.
63
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
1999 1998
-------------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Thousands of Dollars)
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION
Benefit obligation, beginning of year................................... $ 409,811 $ 269,531
Service cost............................................................ 5,073 8,060
Interest cost........................................................... 26,259 17,270
Benefits paid........................................................... (21,846) (20,662)
Participant contributions............................................... 3,633 2,960
Acquisitions............................................................ 12,414
Plan amendments......................................................... 98,918
Actuarial (gain) loss................................................... (40,242) 33,734
---------- ---------
Benefit obligation, end of year......................................... $ 395,102 $ 409,811
========== =========
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS
Plan asset, beginning of year........................................... $ 84,068 $ 56,340
Benefits paid........................................................... (21,846) (20,662)
Employer contributions.................................................. 32,559 32,889
Participant contributions............................................... 3,633 2,960
Actual investment return................................................ 6,414 12,541
---------- ---------
Plan assets, end of year................................................ $ 104,828 $ 84,068
========== =========
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDED STATUS
Funded status........................................................... $ (290,274) $(325,743)
Unrecognized transition (asset) or obligation........................... 134,917 144,046
Unrecognized prior service cost......................................... 91,976 98,918
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss...................................... (97,758) (61,530)
---------- ---------
Net amount recognized at end of year.................................... $ (161,139) $(144,309)
========== =========
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
Discount rate........................................................... 7.5% 6.5%
Rate of increase in compensation levels................................. 3.5 - 5.5% 3.5 - 5.5%
Expected long-term rate of return on assets............................. 10.0% 10.0%
Health care cost trend rates - Under 65................................. 5.8% 6.0%
Health care cost trend rates - 65 and over.............................. 6.2% 6.7%
</TABLE>
The assumed health care rates gradually decline to 5.4% for both medical
categories by 2001.
If the health care cost trend rate assumptions were increased by 1%, the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 1999 would be
increased by approximately 4.9%. The annual effect of the 1% increase on the
total of the service and interest costs would be an increase of approximately
4.6%. If the healthcare cost trend rate assumptions were decreased by 1%, the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 1999 would be
decreased by approximately 4.8%. The annual effect of the 1% decrease on the
total of the service and interest costs would be a decrease of 4.4%.
In 1998, the Company's board of directors approved an amendment, effective
January 1, 1999, which created an account balance based on credited service at
December 31, 1998. Under the new plan, each participant has an account, for
recordkeeping purposes only, to which a $750 credit is allocated annually. This
account balance vests after 5 years of service after age 50. At retirement the
account balance can be used to purchase medical benefits. It may not be taken
as cash. The Company will continue to reflect the costs of the retiree medical
plan according to the provisions of SFAS No. 106 as amended. As a result of the
January 1, 1999 amendment, which is reflected in
64
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
the December 31, 1998 disclosure, the Company's benefit obligation increased $99
million. The plan amendment had no impact on 1998 expense.
The actuarial gains and losses are due to changes in certain actuarial
assumptions.
(e) Postemployment Benefits.
The Company records postemployment benefits based on SFAS No. 112, "Employer's
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," which requires the recognition of a
liability for benefits provided to former or inactive employees, their
beneficiaries and covered dependents, after employment but before retirement
(primarily health care and life insurance benefits for participants in the long-
term disability plan). Net postemployment benefit costs were $11 million in 1999
and were not material in 1998 and 1997.
(13) INCOME TAXES
The Company's current and deferred components of income tax expense (benefit)
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Thousands of Dollars)
Current.............................................................. $ 297,490 $ 439,322 $ 199,011
Deferred............................................................. 601,627 (469,754) 7,363
--------- --------- ---------
Income tax expense (benefit)......................................... $ 899,117 $ (30,432) $ 206,374
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective
income tax rate is below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
--------------- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Thousands of Dollars)
Income (loss) before income taxes...................................... $ 2,564,848 $ (171,524) $ 627,484
Preferred dividends of subsidiary...................................... 2,255
----------- ---------- ---------
Total................................................................ 2,564,848 (171,524) 629,739
Federal statutory rate................................................. 35% 35% 35%
----------- ---------- ---------
Income taxes at statutory rate......................................... 897,697 (60,033) 220,409
----------- ---------- ---------
Net addition (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit................. 24,764 16,853 (9)
Amortization of investment tax credit................................. (20,551) (20,123) (19,777)
Excess deferred taxes................................................. (4,543) (4,011) (5,570)
Difference between book and tax depreciation for which deferred taxes
have not been normalized............................................. 37,069 27,466
Equity dividend exclusion............................................. (980) (5,075)
Equity income - foreign affiliates.................................... (789) (23,241) (17,011)
Goodwill.............................................................. 18,045 18,049 7,242
Other - net........................................................... (15,506) 5,985 (1,301)
----------- ---------- ---------
Total................................................................ 1,420 29,601 (14,035)
----------- ---------- ---------
Income tax expense (benefit)........................................... $ 899,117 $ (30,432) $ 206,374
========== ========= =========
Effective rate......................................................... 35.1% 17.7% 32.8%
</TABLE>
UNA Tax Holiday. Under 1999 Dutch tax law relating to the Dutch electricity
industry, UNA qualifies for a zero tax rate through December 31, 2001. The tax
holiday applies only to the Dutch income earned by UNA. Beginning January 1,
2002, UNA will be subject to Dutch corporate income tax at standard statutory
rates.
65
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Permanent Reinvestment. As of December 31, 1999 the Company had approximately
$29 million of foreign income which is considered to be permanently reinvested
in foreign operations. Of this amount, $3 million is related to the Company's
operations in Argentina and $26 million is related to the Company's operations
in the Netherlands.
Following are the Company's tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their
respective tax bases:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------------------------
1999 1998
------------------ ----------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Current:
Unrealized loss on indexed debt securities..................................... $ 674,497
------------ ------------
Non-current:
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards................................... 34,536 $ 38,659
Employee benefits.............................................................. 98,388 153,367
Disallowed plant cost - net.................................................... 58,058 56,219
Unrealized loss on indexed debt securities..................................... 454,165
Operating loss carryforwards................................................... 38,954 23,178
Foreign income................................................................. 49,850 32,685
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments............................ 40,906 11,764
Contingent liabilities associated with discontinuance of SFAS No. 71........... 73,639
Other.......................................................................... 114,845 46,797
Valuation allowance............................................................ (19,139) (8,591)
------------ ------------
Total non-current deferred tax assets........................................ 490,037 808,243
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax assets - net............................................. $ 1 ,164,534 $ 808,243
------------ ------------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Current:
Unrealized gain on Time Warner investment...................................... $ 1,090,088
----------- ------------
Non-current:
Depreciation................................................................... 2,318,958 $ 2,090,014
Regulatory assets - net........................................................ 379,814 609,694
Capitalized taxes, employee benefits and removal costs......................... 47,907 60,099
Unrealized gain on Time Warner investment...................................... 222,942
Deferred state income taxes.................................................... 68,952 70,000
Deferred gas costs............................................................. 32,361 13,237
Other.......................................................................... 93,664 106,293
----------- ------------
Total non-current deferred tax liabilities................................... 2,941,656 3,172,279
----------- ------------
Total deferred tax liabilities............................................... 4,031,744 3,172,279
----------- -----------
Accumulated deferred income taxes - net................................ $ 2,867,210 $ 2,364,036
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Tax Attribute Carryforwards. At December 31, 1999, the Company had
approximately $492 million of state net operating losses available to offset
future state taxable income through the year 2019. In addition, the Company has
approximately $28 million of federal alternative minimum tax credits which are
available to reduce future federal income taxes payable over an indefinite
period and approximately $1 million of state alternative minimum tax credits
that are available to reduce future state income taxes payable through the year
2002. The valuation allowance reflects a net increase of $11 million in 1999.
This net increase results from a reassessment of the Company's usage of state
tax attributes, including the future ability to use state net operating loss and
alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards offset by changes in valuation
allowances provided for expiring state net operating loss carryforwards.
66
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Tax Refund Case. In July 1990, the Company paid approximately $105 million to
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) following an IRS audit of 1983 and 1984
federal income tax returns. In November 1991, the Company filed a refund suit in
the U.S. Court of Federal Claims seeking the return of $52 million of tax and
$36 million of accrued interest, plus interest on both of those amounts accruing
after July 1990. In September 1997, the United States Court of Appeals upheld a
lower court ruling that the Company was due a refund of federal income taxes
during 1983 and 1984 attributable to fuel cost overrecoveries that subsequently
were refunded to Reliant Energy HL&P's customers. In February 1998, the Company
received a refund of approximately $142 million in taxes and interest paid in
July 1990, including interest accrued since 1990 in the amount of approximately
$57 million. After giving effect to the Company's deferred recognition of the
1990 tax payment and payment of federal income taxes due on the accrued interest
on the refund, the refund had the effect of increasing the Company's earnings in
the fourth quarter of 1997 by $37 million (after-tax).
(14) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Commitments.
The Company has various commitments for capital expenditures, fuel, purchased
power and operating leases. Commitments in connection with Electric Operations'
capital program are generally revocable by the Company, subject to reimbursement
to manufacturers for expenditures incurred or other cancellation penalties.
Wholesale Energy has entered into commitments associated with various non-rate
regulated generating projects aggregating $324 million along with various
generating equipment purchases aggregating $318 million for delivery from 2000
to 2001 that are anticipated to be used for future development projects. The
Company's other commitments have various quantity requirements and durations.
However, if these requirements could not be met, various alternatives are
available to mitigate the cost associated with the contracts' commitments.
(b) Fuel and Purchased Power.
Reliant Energy HL&P is a party to several long-term coal, lignite and natural
gas contracts which have various quantity requirements and durations. Minimum
payment obligations for coal and transportation agreements that extend through
2011 are approximately $187 million in 2000, $188 million in 2001 and $188
million in 2002. Purchase commitments related to lignite mining and lease
agreements, natural gas purchases and storage contracts, and purchased power are
not material to the operations of the Company.
Currently Reliant Energy HL&P is allowed recovery of these costs through base
rates for electric service. As of December 31, 1999, certain of these contracts
are above market. The Company anticipates that stranded cost associated with
these obligations will be recoverable through the stranded cost recovery
mechanisms contained in the Legislation. For information regarding the
Legislation, see Note 3.
(c) Operations Agreement with City of San Antonio.
As part of the 1996 settlement of certain litigation claims asserted by the
City of San Antonio with respect to the South Texas Project, the Company entered
into a 10-year joint operations agreement under which the Company and the City
of San Antonio, acting through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio
(CPS), share savings resulting from the joint dispatching of their respective
generating assets in order to take advantage of each system's lower cost
resources. Under the terms of the joint operations agreement entered into
between CPS and Electric Operations, the Company has guaranteed CPS minimum
annual savings of $10 million and a minimum cumulative savings of $150 million
over the 10-year term of the agreement. Based on current forecasts and other
assumptions regarding the combined operation of the two generating systems, the
Company anticipates that the savings resulting from joint operations will equal
or exceed the minimum savings guaranteed under the joint operating agreement. In
1999, 1998 and 1997, savings generated for CPS' account were approximately $14
million, $14 million and $22 million,
67
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
respectively. Through December 31, 1999, cumulative earnings generated for CPS'
account were approximately $64 million.
(d) Transportation Agreement.
Resources had an agreement (ANR Agreement) with ANR Pipeline Company (ANR)
which contemplated that Resources would transfer to ANR an interest in certain
of Resources' pipeline and related assets. The interest represented capacity of
250 Mmcf/day. Under the ANR Agreement, an ANR affiliate advanced $125 million
to Resources. Subsequently, the parties restructured the ANR Agreement and
Resources refunded in 1995 and 1993, $50 million and $34 million, respectively,
to ANR. Resources recorded $41 million as a liability reflecting ANR's use of
130 Mmcf/day of capacity in certain of Resources' transportation facilities.
The level of transportation will decline to 100 Mmcf/day in the year 2003 with a
refund of $5 million to ANR. The ANR Agreement will terminate in 2005 with a
refund of the remaining balance.
(e) Lease Commitments.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Company's
obligations under non-cancelable long-term operating leases at December 31, 1999
which primarily relate to Resources principally consisting of rental agreements
for building space, data processing equipment and vehicles, including major work
equipment (in millions):
2000........................................ $ 16
2001........................................ 15
2002........................................ 10
2003........................................ 8
2004........................................ 7
2005 and beyond............................. 25
----
Total..................................... $ 81
----
(f) Letters of Credit.
At December 31, 1999, the Company had letters of credit totaling approximately
$14 million under which it is obligated to reimburse drawings, if any.
(g) Cross Border Leases.
During the period from 1994 through 1997, under cross border lease
transactions, UNA leased several of its power plants and related equipment and
turbines to non-Netherlands based investors and concurrently leased the
facilities back under sublease arrangements with remaining terms as of December
31, 1999 of two to 25 years. Such transactions involve the Company providing to
a foreign investor an ownership right in (but not necessarily title to) an
asset, with a leaseback of the asset. The net proceeds to UNA of the
transactions are being amortized to income over the lease terms. At December
31, 1999, the deferred gain on these transactions totaled $87 million assuming
an exchange rate of 2.19 NLG per U.S. dollar (the exchange rate on December 31,
1999). UNA utilized proceeds from the head lease transactions to prepay
sublease obligations as well as provide a source for payment of end of term
purchase options and other financial undertakings. The leased property remains
on the financial statements of UNA and continues to be depreciated. In the case
of early termination of the cross border leases, UNA would be contingently
liable for certain payments to the sublessors, which at December 31, 1999 are
estimated to be $254 million. Prior to March 1, 2000, UNA will be required by
some of the lease agreements to obtain standby letters of credit in favor of the
sublessors in the event of early termination in the amount of $205 million
(assumes an exchange rate of 2.19 NLG per U.S. dollar, the exchange rate on
December 31, 1999). Commitments for such letters of credit have been obtained
as of December 31, 1999.
68
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(h) Environmental Matters.
The Company is a defendant in litigation arising out of the environmental
remediation of a site in Corpus Christi, Texas. The litigation was instituted
in 1985 by adjacent landowners. The litigation is pending before the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi
Division. The site was operated by third parties as a metals reclaiming
operation. Although the Company neither operated nor owned the site, certain
transformers and other equipment originally sold by the Company may have been
delivered to the site by third parties. The Company and others have remediated
the site pursuant to a plan approved by appropriate state agencies and a federal
court. To date, the Company has recovered or has commitments to recover from
other responsible parties $2.2 million of the more than $3 million it has spent
on remediation.
In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (i)
identified the Company, along with several other parties, as "potentially
responsible parties" (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) for the costs of cleaning up a site
located adjacent to one of the Company's transmission lines in La Marque, Texas
and (ii) issued an administrative order for the remediation of the site. The
Company believes that the EPA took this action solely on the basis of
information indicating that the Company in the 1950s acquired record title to a
portion of the land on which the site is located. The Company does not believe
that it now or previously has held any ownership interest in the property
covered by the order and has obtained a judgment to that effect from a court in
Galveston County, Texas. Based on this judgment and other defenses that the
Company believes to be meritorious, the Company has elected not to adhere to the
EPA's administrative order, even though the Company understands that other PRPs
are proceeding with site remediation. To date, neither the EPA nor any other
PRP has instituted an action against the Company for any share of the
remediation costs for the site. However, if the Company was determined to be a
responsible party, the Company could be jointly and severally liable along with
the other PRPs for the aggregate remediation costs of the site (which the
Company currently estimates to be approximately $80 million in the aggregate)
and could be assessed substantial fines and damage claims. Although the
ultimate outcome of this matter cannot currently be predicted at this time, the
Company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition, or results of operations or cash flows.
From time to time the Company has received notices from regulatory authorities
or others regarding its status as a PRP in connection with sites found to
require remediation due to the presence of environmental contaminants. In
addition, the Company has been named as defendant in litigation related to such
sites and in recent years has been named, along with numerous others, as a
defendant in several lawsuits filed by a large number of individuals who claim
injury due to exposure to asbestos while working at sites along the Texas Gulf
Coast. Most of these claimants have been workers who participated in
construction of various industrial facilities, including power plants, and some
of the claimants have worked at locations owned by the Company. The Company
anticipates that additional claims like those received may be asserted in the
future and intends to continue vigorously contesting claims which it does not
consider to have merit. Although their ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at
this time, the Company does not believe, based on its experience to date, that
these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
(i) Other.
The Company is involved in legal, tax and regulatory proceedings before
various courts, regulatory commissions and governmental agencies regarding
matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve
substantial amounts. The Company's management regularly analyzes current
information and, as necessary, provides accruals for probable liabilities on the
eventual disposition of these matters. The Company's management believes that
the effect on the Company's respective financial statements, if any, from the
disposition of these matters will not be material.
In February 1996, the cities of Wharton, Galveston and Pasadena filed suit,
for themselves and a proposed class of all similarly situated cities in Reliant
Energy HL&P's service area, against the Company and Houston Industries
69
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Finance Inc. (formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) alleging
underpayment of municipal franchise fees. Plaintiffs in essence claim that they
are entitled to 4% of all receipts of any kind for business conducted within
city limits or with the use of city rights-of-way. Plaintiffs advance their
claims notwithstanding their failure to assert such claims over the previous
four decades. Because all of the franchise ordinances affecting Electric
Operations expressly impose fees only on the Company's own receipts and only
from sales of electricity for consumption within a city, the Company regards
plaintiffs' allegations as spurious and is vigorously contesting the case. The
plaintiffs' pleadings assert that their damages exceed $250 million. The 269th
Judicial District Court for Harris County has granted a partial summary judgment
in favor of the Company dismissing all claims for franchise fees based on sales
tax collections. Other motions for partial summary judgment were denied. A jury
trial of the remaining individual claims of the three named cities (but not the
entire class) began on February 14, 2000 and is expected to conclude by the end
of March 2000. The extent to which issues resolved in this trial may affect the
claims of the other class member cities cannot be determined until final
judgment is rendered. The Company believes that it is very unlikely that
resolution of this case will have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
(15) ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
-------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
----------------- ----------------- ---------------- -----------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial assets:
Investment in Time Warner securities.............. $ 3,979,461 $ 3,979,461 $ 990,000 $ 2,843,585
Energy derivatives - non-trading.................. 2,823
Foreign currency swaps............................ 6,011
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt (excluding capital leases)......... 9,329,715 9,212,871 7,183,320 7,470,785
Trust securities.................................. 705,272 598,690 342,232 367,649
Interest rate swaps............................... 38 92 109 3,160
Energy derivatives - non-trading.................. 1,105 8,166
</TABLE>
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, investments in debt and equity
security classified as "available-for-sale" and "trading" in accordance with
SFAS No. 115 (except for Time Warner securities), and notes payable are
estimated to be equivalent to carrying amounts and have been excluded from the
above table. The remaining fair values have been determined using quoted market
prices of the same or similar securities when available or other estimation
techniques.
The fair value of financial instruments included in the trading operations are
marked-to-market at December 31, 1999 and 1998 (see Note 5). Therefore, they
are stated at fair value and are excluded from the table.
70
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(16) Earnings Per Share
The following table reconciles numerators and denominators of the Company's
basic and diluted earnings per share calculations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Basic EPS calculation:
Income (loss) before extraordinary item and preferred $ 1,665,731 $ (141,092) $ 421,110
dividends...............................................
Less: Preferred dividends................................ 389 390 162
----------- ---------- ---------
Income (loss) attributable to common stockholders 1,665,342 (141,482) 420,948
before extraordinary item...............................
Extraordinary item....................................... (183,261)
----------- ---------- ---------
Net income (loss)........................................ $ 1,482,081 $ (141,482) $ 420,948
=========== ========== =========
Weighted average shares outstanding...................... 285,040 284,095 253,599
Basic EPS:
Income (loss) before extraordinary item.................. $ 5.84 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== ========== =========
Extraordinary item....................................... $ (.64) $ $
=========== ========== =========
Net income (loss)........................................ $ 5.20 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== ========== =========
Diluted EPS calculation:
Net income (loss)........................................ $ 1,482,081 $ (141,482) $ 420,948
Plus: Income impact of assumed conversions
Interest on 6 1/4% convertible trust preferred securities 30 668
----------- ---------- ---------
Total effect assuming dilution........................... $ 1,482,111 $ (141,482) $ 421,616
=========== ========== =========
Weighted average shares outstanding....................... 285,040 284,095 253,599
Plus: Incremental shares from assumed conversions (1)
Stock options............................................ 400 89
Restricted stock......................................... 701
6 1/4% convertible trust preferred securities............ 23 510
----------- ---------- ---------
Weighted average shares assuming dilution................ 286,164 284,095 254,198
=========== ========== =========
Diluted EPS:
Income (loss) before extraordinary item.................. $ 5.82 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== ========== =========
Extraordinary item....................................... $ (.64) $ $
=========== ========== =========
Net income (loss)........................................ $ 5.18 $ (.50) $ 1.66
=========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
_____________
(1) No assumed conversions were included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share for 1998 because additional shares outstanding would result in an
anti-dilutive per share amount. The computation of diluted EPS for 1998
excludes 492,000 shares of restricted stock and purchase options for
434,000 shares of common stock which would be anti-dilutive if exercised.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the computation of diluted EPS excludes
purchase options for 433,915 shares of common stock that have exercise prices
(ranging from $28.72 to $32.22 per share) greater than the $27.58 per share
average market price for the period.
71
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(7) UNAUDITED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
Summarized quarterly financial data is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31, 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
---------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
Revenues........................................... $2,642,904 $3,657,828 $4,947,192 $4,054,886
Operating income................................... 187,665 291,122 494,288 267,439
Extraordinary item, net of tax..................... 183,261
Net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders...................................... (209,789) 74,664 1,689,990 (72,784)
Basic earnings (loss) per share (2)
Extraordinary item, net of tax.................... (.64)
Net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders..................................... (.74) .26 5.92 (.26)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (2)
Extraordinary item, net of tax.................... (.64)
Net income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders..................................... (.74) .26 5.90 (.26)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31, 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
---------------- --------------- --------------- ----------------
<C> <C> <C> <C>
<S> (thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
Revenues (1)........................................ $2,631,322 $2,736,626 $3,465,487 $2,655,029
Operating income (1)................................ 281,735 454,208 506,994 222,881
Net income (loss) attributable to common (30,115) 41,484 251,709 (404,560)
stockholders (1)...................................
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (2)..... (.11) .15 .89 (1.42)
</TABLE>
__________
(1) Includes retroactive adjustment for change in accounting for energy price
risk management and trading activities to mark-to-market accounting for the
first, second and third quarters of 1998 (see Note 1(o)).
(2) Quarterly earnings per common share are based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the quarter, and the sum of the
quarters may not equal annual earnings per common share.
(18) REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
The Company's determination of reportable segments considers the strategic
operating units under which the Company manages sales, allocates resources and
assesses performance of various products and services to wholesale or retail
customers in differing regulatory environments. Financial information for
Resources and UNA are included in the segment disclosures only for periods
beginning on their respective acquisition dates. The accounting policies of the
segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant
accounting policies except that certain executive benefit costs have not been
allocated to segments. The Company evaluates performance based on operating
income excluding certain corporate costs not allocated to the segments. The
Company accounts for intersegment sales as if the sales were to third parties,
that is, at current market prices.
72
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The Company has identified the following reportable segments: Electric
Operations, Natural Gas Distribution, Interstate Pipelines, Wholesale Energy,
Reliant Energy Europe, Reliant Energy Latin America and Corporate. For
description of the financial reporting segments, see Note 1(a). Financial data
for business segments, products and services and geographic areas are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Reliant
Electric Natural Gas Insterstate Wholesale Energy
Operations Distribution Pipelines Energy Europe
---------- ------------ ----------- --------- ---------
(Thousands of Dollars)
As of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999:
- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues from external
customers....................... $ 4,483,126 $ 1,895,358 $ 121,514 $ 7,688,960 $ 152,865
Intersegment revenues............ 1,202 153,580 260,317
Depreciation and amortization.... 666,968 132,424 49,127 25,323 20,737
Operating income................. 981,006 124,863 113,018 45,308 32,049
Total assets..................... 9,940,685 3,386,596 2,211,842 2,773,070 3,247,290
Equity investments in and
advances to unconsolidated
subsidiaries.................... 78,041
Expenditures for long-lived
assets.......................... 572,625 205,545 30,131 529,805 834,300
As of and for the year ended
December 31, 1998:
- ------------------
Revenues from external
customers....................... 4,350,275 1,877,185 126,988 4,289,006
Intersegment revenues............ 1,167 155,508 167,152
Depreciation and amortization.... 663,740 130,658 44,025 18,204
Operating income................. 1,002,409 144,447 128,328 59,170
Total assets..................... 10,404,447 3,141,762 2,050,636 1,535,007
Equity investments in and
advances to unconsolidated
subsidiaries.................... 42,252
Expenditures for long-lived
assets.......................... 433,474 161,735 59,358 363,174
As of and for the year ended
December 31, 1997:
- ------------------
Revenues from external
customers....................... 4,251,243 920,125 49,655 1,288,357
Intersegment revenues............ 505 58,678 76,301
Depreciation and amortization.... 582,040 52,374 19,088 2,633
Operating income................. 985,484 56,842 31,978 912
Expenditures for long-lived
assets.......................... 236,977 61,078 16,304 14,038
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Reliant
Energy
Latin Reconciling
America Corporate Eliminations Consolidated
---------- ------------ -------------- -------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
As of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999:
- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues from external
customers....................... $ 79,717 $ 881,270 $ 15,302,810
Intersegment revenues............ 73,648 $ (488,747)
Depreciation and amortization.... 5,817 10,726 911,122
Operating income................. (23,021) (32,709) 1,240,514
Total assets..................... 1,155,500 4,645,403 (1,139,450) 26,220,936
Equity investments in and
advances to unconsolidated
subsidiaries.................... 944,169 1,022,210
Expenditures for long-lived
assets.......................... 93,296 89,840 2,355,542
As of and for the year ended
December 31, 1998:
- ------------------
Revenues from external
customers....................... 258,945 586,065 11,488,464
Intersegment revenues............ 97,181 (421,008)
Depreciation and amortization.... 3,820 9,646 870,093
Operating income................. 181,707 (50,243) 1,465,818
Total assets..................... 1,242,689 1,679,876 (915,895) 19,138,522
Equity investments in and
advances to unconsolidated
subsidiaries.................... 1,009,348 1,051,600
Expenditures for long-lived
assets.......................... 435,077 28,077 1,480,895
As of and for the year ended
December 31, 1997:
- ------------------
Revenues from external
customers....................... 92,028 276,817 6,878,225
Intersegment revenues............ 34,853 (170,337)
Depreciation and amortization.... 3,470 5,769 665,374
Operating income................. 19,510 (39,680) 1,055,046
Expenditures for long-lived
assets.......................... 231,528 1,426,323 1,986,248
</TABLE>
73
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Thousands of Dollars)
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME TO NET INCOME
(LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
Operating income.................................... $ 1,240,514 $ 1,465,818 $1,055,046
Interest income - IRS refund........................ 56,269
Time Warner dividend income......................... 25,770 41,250 41,340
Interest expense.................................... (511,474) (509,601) (395,085)
Unrealized gain on Time Warner investment........... 2,452,406
Unrealized loss on indexed debt securities.......... (629,523) (1,176,211) (121,402)
Distribution on trust securities.................... (51,220) (29,201) (26,230)
Income tax benefit (expense)........................ (899,117) 30,432 (206,374)
Other income (expense).............................. 37,986 36,031 17,384
Extraordinary item, net of tax...................... (183,261)
----------- ----------- ----------
Net income (loss) attributable to common $ 1,482,081 $ (141,482) $ 420,948
stockholders.......................................
=========== =========== ==========
REVENUES BY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES:
Retail power sales.................................. $ 4,483,126 $ 4,350,275 $4,251,243
Retail gas sales.................................... 2,669,393 2,372,086 1,156,618
Wholesale energy and energy related sales........... 7,808,401 4,248,181 1,271,400
Gas transport....................................... 157,530 167,812 66,265
Income from Latin America investments............... 79,717 258,945 92,028
Energy products and services........................ 104,643 91,165 40,671
----------- ----------- ----------
Total............................................... $15,302,810 $11,488,464 $6,878,225
=========== =========== ==========
REVENUES AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS BY GEOGRAPHIC AREAS:
REVENUES:
US.................................................. $14,953,546 $11,229,519 $6,786,197
Latin America....................................... 79,717 258,945 92,028
Netherlands......................................... 152,865
Other............................................... 116,682
----------- ----------- ----------
Total............................................... $15,302,810 $11,488,464 $6,878,225
=========== =========== ==========
LONG-LIVED ASSETS:
US.................................................. $15,664,491 $16,273,392
Latin America....................................... 1,116,928 1,195,849
Netherlands......................................... 3,186,146
Other............................................... 102 110
----------- -----------
Total............................................... $19,967,667 $17,469,351
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
74
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
(19) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
(a) Acquisition of Remaining Shares of UNA.
On March 1, 2000, the Company purchased the remaining 48% of the shares of UNA
for $975 million. Funds for the March 1, 2000 acquisition were obtained, in
part, from a Euro 600 million (approximately $596 million) three-year term loan
facility established in February 2000. See Note 2 for additional information
regarding the acquisition of UNA.
(b) Sithe Power Generating Assets Acquisition.
In February 2000, the Company signed a definitive agreement to purchase from
Sithe Energies, Inc. non-rate regulated power generating assets and sites
located in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland having a net generating
capacity of more than 4,200 megawatts for an aggregate purchase price of $2.1
billion, subject to certain adjustments. The acquisition is expected to close
in the second quarter of 2000 and is subject to obtaining certain regulatory
approvals and satisfying other closing conditions. The acquisition will be
accounted for as a purchase.
(c) Other Financings.
In February 2000, a financing subsidiary of the Company borrowed $500 million
under a $650 million revolving credit facility that was established in February
2000 and terminates on April 30, 2000. Proceeds were used by the financing
subsidiary to purchase Series G Preference Stock of Reliant Energy. The Company
used the proceeds from the sale of Preference Stock for general corporate
purposes, including the repayment of indebtedness. In addition, in March 2000,
the Company borrowed $150 million under a revolving credit facility that was
established in February 2000 and terminates on May 31, 2000. The Company used
the proceeds from the borrowing for general corporate purposes, including the
repayment of indebtedness.
(d) Treasury Stock Purchases.
During the period from January 1, 2000 through March 1, 2000, the Company
purchased 1,183,800 shares of its common stock for approximately $27 million at
an average price of $23.07 per share.
(e) Natural Gas Distribution and Interstate Pipelines (Unaudited).
In March 2000, the Company announced that it had retained an investment
banking firm to assist it in evaluating strategic alternatives, including
divestiture, for (i) two of its natural gas distribution divisions, Reliant
Energy Arkla and Reliant Energy Minnegasco, (ii) its Interstate Pipelines'
operations and (iii) its natural gas gathering and pipeline services operations.
75
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Reliant Energy, Incorporated:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Reliant
Energy, Incorporated and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31,
1999 and 1998, and the related statements of consolidated income, consolidated
comprehensive income, consolidated cash flows and consolidated stockholders'
equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Reliant Energy, Incorporated and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
March 1, 2000
76
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
PROXY COMMON STOCK
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints R. Steve Letbetter, Lee W. Hogan, and Robert J.
Cruikshank, and each of them, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to
vote as designated on the reverse side, all shares of common stock held by the
undersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Reliant Energy,
Incorporated to be held May 3, 2000, at 9 a. m. (CDT) in the Reliant Energy
Plaza auditorium, 1111 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas, or any adjournments
thereof, and with discretionary authority to vote on all other matters that may
properly come before the meeting.
IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS, YOU MAY JUST SIGN AND
DATE BELOW AND MAIL IN THE POSTAGE-
PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED. SPECIFIC
CHOICES MAY BE MADE ON THE REVERSE
SIDE. IN THE ABSENCE OF INSTRUCTIONS
TO THE CONTRARY, THE SHARES
REPRESENTED WILL BE VOTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD'S
RECOMMENDATION.
DATED:_________________________, 2000
Signature:___________________________
SIGNATURE:___________________________
NOTE: PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS NAME(S)
APPEARS HEREON. JOINT OWNERS SHOULD
EACH SIGN. WHEN SIGNING AS ATTORNEY,
EXECUTOR, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE OR
GUARDIAN, PLEASE GIVE FULL TITLE.
DO YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL
MEETING?____
Detach and Mail Card
Fellow Shareholder:
I am proud to serve as your new Chairman and CEO as Reliant Energy enters into
its third century of service. Just as we met the challenges of the 19th century
frontier, we will meet the challenges and seize the opportunities of unknown
frontiers in the 21st century.
Reliant Energy has a clear vision of how it intends to remain a leader as the
energy business evolves. We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to
participate in the restructuring of the energy industry and we will remain a
major force for positive change, evolution and innovation. We anticipated
restructuring of our industry and began investing early in the assets we will
need to remain a strong, resilient competitor.
Reliant Energy is evolving. The events and accomplishments over the past few
years have given us strength and experience, a solid base on which to build our
future. Although we were disappointed with our stock performance in 1999, we
realize that our stock price was an echo of many other companies in the
industry. The market is looking for a clear view of how we will tackle the
future. I believe that as the year unfolds, the market will see that we are
well positioned to maximize value in an evolving market.
Please join me at our 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be held
at 9 a.m., May 3, 2000, in the Reliant Energy Plaza auditorium. A map of
downtown Houston, printed on the back of this proxy, directs you to our building
and the Regency Parking Garage. If you are unable to attend the meeting, I urge
you to make your vote count by signing and returning the proxy card as soon as
possible.
R. Steve Letbetter
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>
RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED
PROXY (CONTINUED)
2000 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
The nominees for Class I directors are Robert J. Cruikshank, Linnet F. Deily, T.
Milton Honea and Laree E. Perez. The nominee for Class III director is Lee W.
Hogan. Terms for Class I directors will expire in 2003; term for Class III
director will expire in 2002. Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote
FOR all nominees for director, FOR the approval of the adoption of the Reliant
Energy, Incorporated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and FOR ratification of
the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent accountants and auditors
for 2000. To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee in Class I,
please write that nominee's name in the space provided below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FOR WITH- FOR ALL
ALL HOLD EXCEPT
1. Election of nominees 3. Approval of the adoption of the FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
for director in Class I. [ ] [ ] [ ] Reliant Energy, Incorporated [ ] [ ] [ ]
Annual Incentive Compensation
Exceptions:__________________ Plan.
FOR WITHHOLD
2. Election of nominee 4. Ratification of the Appointment FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
for director in Class III. [ ] [ ] of Deloitte & Touche LLP [ ] [ ] [ ]
as independent accountants
and auditors for 2000.
</TABLE>
