MERCURY AIR GROUP INC
PRER14A, 1996-02-05
AIRPORTS, FLYING FIELDS & AIRPORT TERMINAL SERVICES
Previous: GROUND ROUND RESTAURANTS INC, SC 13D, 1996-02-05
Next: JOSTENS INC, S-8, 1996-02-05



<PAGE>
                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                  Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

    Filed by the Registrant /X/
    Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /

    Check the appropriate box:
    /X/  Preliminary Proxy Statement
    / /  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
         14a-6(e)(2))
    / /  Definitive Proxy Statement
    / /  Definitive Additional Materials
    / /  Soliciting  Material  Pursuant  to  Section  240.14a-11(c)  or  Section
         240.14a-12

                                     MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

/ /  $125 per  Exchange Act  Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii),  14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2)  or
     Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
/ /  $500  per  each party  to  the controversy  pursuant  to Exchange  Act Rule
     14a-6(i)(3).
/ /  Fee  computed  on   table  below   per  Exchange   Act  Rules   14a-6(i)(4)
     and 0-11.
     1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
        pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
        filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     5) Total fee paid:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
/X/  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ /  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
     0-11(a)(2)  and identify the  filing for which the  offsetting fee was paid
     previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement  number,
     or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     1) Amount Previously Paid:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     3) Filing Party:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     4) Date Filed:
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                            MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.

                               ------------------

                    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                            ------------------------

   
                           TO BE HELD MARCH 21, 1996
    

To the Shareholders of Mercury Air Group, Inc.:

   
    NOTICE  IS  HEREBY GIVEN  that an  Annual Meeting  of the  Shareholders (the
"Meeting") of Mercury Air Group, Inc. (the "Company") will be held on March  21,
1996  at 10:00 o'clock a.m. Pacific Standard Time at the principal office of the
Company located at  5456 McConnell  Avenue, Suite 100,  Los Angeles,  California
90066, for the following purposes:
    

        1.   To elect  six directors to  serve until the  next Annual Meeting of
    Shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

        2.  To  consider and vote  upon an amendment  to the Company's  Restated
    Certificate  of Incorporation to  increase from 9,000,000  to 18,000,000 the
    number of authorized  shares of  Mercury common  stock, par  value $.01  per
    share ("Mercury Common Stock").

        3.   To  transact such  other business as  may properly  come before the
    Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

   
    Only holders  of  record of  the  Company's Common  Stock  at the  close  of
business  on February 14, 1996  which has been fixed as  the record date for the
Meeting, shall be  entitled to  notice of  and to vote  at the  Meeting and  any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
    

    Shareholders  are cordially invited to attend the Meeting in person. Whether
or not you plan to attend the Meeting, please sign, date and return the enclosed
proxy to ensure that  your shares are represented  at the Meeting.  Shareholders
who  attend the Meeting may  vote their shares personally  even though they have
sent in their proxies.

                                          Randolph E. Ajer
                                          SECRETARY

Los Angeles, California
   
February   , 1996
    
<PAGE>
                            MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.
                             5456 MCCONNELL AVENUE
                                   SUITE 100
                         LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90066

                                PROXY STATEMENT

                         ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
   
                                 MARCH 21, 1996
    

   
    This  Proxy Statement  is furnished in  connection with  the solicitation of
proxies by  the Board  of  Directors of  Mercury Air  Group,  Inc., a  New  York
corporation  (the "Company"), to be voted  at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of the Company (the  "Meeting") which will  be held on March  21, 1996 at  10:00
o'clock  a.m.  Pacific Standard  Time at  the principal  offices of  the Company
located at 5456 McConnell Avenue, Suite 100, Los Angeles, California 90066,  and
any  adjournment  or postponement  thereof, for  the purposes  set forth  in the
accompanying Notice  of  Annual  Meeting  of  Shareholders  and  in  this  Proxy
Statement.
    

   
    The  Company will bear the entire cost of solicitation of proxies, including
preparation, assembly, printing and mailing  of this Proxy Statement, the  proxy
and any additional information furnished to shareholders. Copies of solicitation
material   will  be  furnished  to  banks,  brokerage  houses,  fiduciaries  and
custodians holding in their names shares  of Common Stock beneficially owned  by
others  to forward  proxy materials to  such beneficial owners.  The Company may
reimburse persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in
forwarding  solicitation  material  to  such  beneficial  owners.  The  original
solicitation  of proxies by  mail may be supplemented  by telephone, telegram or
personal solicitation by directors, officers  or other regular employees of  the
Company. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers or other
regular employees for such services.
    

    Proxies  duly executed and received in time for the Meeting will be voted at
the  Meeting  in  accordance  with  the  instructions  on  the  proxies.  Unless
previously  revoked or unless other instructions  are on the proxy, proxies will
be voted at the Meeting: (a) for the six director nominees named herein, (b) for
the amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, and (c) as
determined by the persons holding the  proxies with regard to all other  matters
which come before the Meeting.

   
    The  approximate date on  which this Proxy  Statement and accompanying proxy
will first be sent or given to shareholders is February 14, 1996.
    

                               VOTING SECURITIES

   
    At the record date for  the Meeting, the close  of business on February  14,
1996  (the "Record Date"), the Company had outstanding          shares of common
stock, par value  $0.01 ("Common Stock").  Each shareholder is  entitled to  one
vote for every share of Common Stock standing in his name as of the Record Date.
A  shareholder who  has given a  proxy may  revoke it at  any time  before it is
exercised at the Meeting by filing with  the Secretary of the Company a  written
notice  of revocation, by executing and  delivering a subsequent proxy bearing a
later date, or by attending  the Meeting and voting  in person. The presence  at
the Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, in person or by proxy,
of  the  holders of  record  of one-third  of the  shares  of Common  Stock will
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Shareholders who either (a)
specifically abstained from voting  on one or more  matters by so marking  their
ballot  or  proxy card  (abstentions)  or (b)  are  nominees holding  shares for
beneficial owners who, although  they may have voted  on certain matters at  the
meeting  pursuant to discretionary authority or instructions from the beneficial
owners, have not voted on the specific matter in question because they have  not
received instructions from the beneficial owners with respect to such matter and
they do not have discretionary authority with respect thereto (broker non-votes)
will be considered as present at the Meeting for purposes of determining whether
a quorum exists with respect to all other matters considered at the Meeting. Mr.
Seymour  Kahn, Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer of the company
and the beneficial owner of approximately 25.5% of the outstanding Common Stock,
has indicated that he intends to vote for the six director nominees named herein
and for the amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
    
<PAGE>
                      PROPOSAL 1 -- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

    The Board of  Directors has nominated  six individuals for  election to  the
Company's  Board of Directors. The  solicited proxies may be  voted to fill only
the six vacancies on the Board of Directors for which nominees are named in this
Proxy Statement. Each director  elected will hold office  until the next  annual
meeting  of shareholders  and until  his successor  is elected  and qualified or
until the director's earlier death,  resignation or removal. With the  exception
of  Joseph A. Czyzyk, who  was appointed to the  Board of Directors in November,
1994, all of  the nominees  are currently  directors of  the Company  previously
elected by the shareholders.

    Unless  otherwise indicated thereon,  all proxies received  will be voted in
favor of the election of  the indicated six nominees  of the Board of  Directors
named below as directors of the Company. Should any of the nominees not remain a
candidate  for election on the date of the Meeting (which contingency is not now
contemplated or foreseen by the Board of Directors), proxies solicited hereunder
may be  voted  for substitute  nominees  selected  by the  Board  of  Directors.
Directors  shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the Common Stock
at the Meeting.

INFORMATION REGARDING NOMINEES

    Listed below are the persons who  have been nominated to serve as  directors
for the ensuing year, together with their ages and all Company positions held by
them.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             NAME               AGE                   POSITIONS
- ------------------------------  ----  ------------------------------------------
<S>                             <C>   <C>
Seymour Kahn                     68   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                       Officer of Mercury

Joseph A. Czyzyk                 48   President, Chief Operating Officer and
                                       Director of Mercury and President of
                                       Mercury Air Cargo

Philip J. Fagan, Jr., M.D.       51   Director

Frederick H. Kopko, Jr.          40   Director

William G. Langton               49   Director

Robert L. List                   59   Director
</TABLE>

   
    SEYMOUR  KAHN served as  President of Mercury  from 1969 until  1989 and has
served as Chief  Executive Officer  and Chairman of  the Board  of Directors  of
Mercury since 1974.
    

   
    JOSEPH  A. CZYZYK has been President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director
of Mercury since November 1994 and  President of Mercury Air Cargo since  August
1988.  Mr. Czyzyk  also served  as President of  Mercury Service,  a division of
Mercury which sells aviation fuel and provides refueling services for commercial
aircraft, from August 1985 until August 1988. Mr. Czyzyk served as an  Executive
Vice  President of Mercury from November 1990 through November 1994. Pursuant to
his employment agreement, the Board of  Directors will continue to nominate  Mr.
Czyzyk  as a candidate for  election to the Board  of Directors while Mr. Czyzyk
remains employed by Mercury. See "-- Employment Agreements".
    

   
    PHILIP J. FAGAN, JR.,  M.D. has been a  director of Mercury since  September
1989.  Dr.  Fagan has  been the  Chief  Executive Officer  and President  of the
Emergency Department Physicians Medical Group, Inc. since its inception in 1978.
Dr. Fagan has also  been President of Fagan  Emergency Room Medical Group  since
its  inception  in  1989.  Both  companies  are  currently  located  in Burbank,
California.
    

    FREDERICK H. KOPKO, JR. has been  a director of Mercury since October  1992.
Mr.  Kopko has been a partner in the  law firm of McBreen, McBreen & Kopko since
January 1990. Previously, Mr. Kopko served  as managing partner of the law  firm
of  D'Ancona &  Pflaum, a  firm which  he was  associated with  from August 1983
through December 1989. Mr. Kopko presently  serves on the board of directors  of
Butler International, Inc.

                                       2
<PAGE>
   
    WILLIAM  G. LANGTON has  been a director  of Mercury since  August 1993. Mr.
Langton  has  been  President  and  Chief  Operating  Officer  of  Southern  Air
Transport,  a provider of  a wide range of  commercial and supplemental aviation
services, for over ten years.
    

   
    ROBERT L.  LIST has  been a  director of  Mercury since  1990. Mr.  List  is
presently  an  independent financial  consultant. From  December 1989  to August
1992, Mr.  List was  President of  Yellowstone Environmental  Services, Inc.  of
Phoenix,  Arizona, an environmental/engineering consulting  firm. Prior to that,
Mr. List owned and  operated Cimarron Research,  an investment consulting  firm,
based  in Durango, Colorado and Dallas, Texas since 1977. Mr. List serves on the
board of directors of Pancho's Mexican Buffet, Inc.
    

    There were seven  meetings of  the Board of  Directors of  the Company  held
during fiscal 1995, the period from July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995.

   
    The  Audit Committee  reviews the internal  controls of the  Company and the
objectivity of  its  financial  reporting and  meets  with  appropriate  Company
financial   personnel  and  the  Company's  independent  public  accountants  in
connection with these reviews. During fiscal 1995, the Audit Committee consisted
of Messrs. Kopko and List and Dr. Fagan. During fiscal 1995, the Audit Committee
met one time.
    

    The Compensation Committee makes all  decisions regarding cash and  non-cash
compensation  (excluding standard employee benefits)  paid or given to executive
officers of the Company; administers  the Company's non-cash employee  incentive
plans, including stock purchase and stock option grants; negotiates and approves
all  employment agreements with executive  officers; and negotiates and approves
all transactions between the Company and its executive officers (whether or  not
the  primary purpose of such transactions are compensatory). During fiscal 1995,
the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Kopko and List and Dr. Fagan.

    The Board  does not  have  a nominating  committee  or any  other  committee
performing a similar function.

    During  fiscal 1995, each member of the Board of Directors attended at least
75% of the Board meetings and committee meetings for the committees on which  he
served.

   
    Under  New  York  law, election  of  the  directors requires  approval  of a
majority of the votes cast for or against, so long as a quorum is present at the
Meeting. Consequently, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect  of
reducing the number of votes needed to elect directors.
    

    THE  MERCURY BOARD OF  DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS  THAT THE HOLDERS OF
COMMON STOCK VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES.

                             PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

   
    The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31,  1995,
with  respect  to the  ownership  of the  Company's  Common Stock  by:  (a) each
director or director nominee of the Company; (b) each executive officer named in
the Summary  Compensation Table  on page  6  of this  Proxy Statement;  (c)  the
directors,  nominees and executive officers of the  Company, as a group; and (d)
all persons known to the Company to  be the beneficial owners of more than  five
percent  of its outstanding  Common Stock. As  of December 31,  1995, there were
5,380,087 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
    

                                       3
<PAGE>
The stock ownership information includes  current shareholdings and shares  with
respect  to  which the  named  individual has  the  right to  acquire beneficial
ownership under options exercisable within 60 days.

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AND ADDRESS (1)                                          SHARES OF COMMON   PERCENT
- ------------------------------------------------------------  ----------------   -------
<S>                                                           <C>                <C>
Seymour Kahn................................................   1,398,140(2)       25.5%

Joseph A. Czyzyk............................................     396,450(3)        7.3%

Randolph E. Ajer............................................     143,000(4)        2.6%

Kevin J. Walsh..............................................     132,000(5)        2.4%

William L. Silva............................................     137,500(6)        2.5%

Robert L. List..............................................      11,000(7)        *
 810 Duval Street
 Key West, FL 33040

Philip J. Fagan, Jr., M.D...................................      99,000(8)        1.8%
 624A South San Fernando Blvd.
 Burbank, CA 91502

Frederick H. Kopko, Jr......................................      33,000(9)        *
 20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 2520
 Chicago, IL 60606

William G. Langton..........................................      22,000(10)       *
 2255 Kimberly Parkway, East
 Columbus, OH 43232

Kennedy Capital Management, Inc. (11).......................     395,000           7.3%
 425 N. New Ballas Road #181
 St. Louis, MO 63141-6821

All directors and executive officers as a group (9
 persons)...................................................   1,932,090(12)      33.8%
</TABLE>
    

- ------------------------
*   Less than one percent.

(1) Unless  otherwise  indicated in  the  table, the  address  for each  of  the
    individuals  named in  the table  is 5456  McConnell Avenue,  Suite 100, Los
    Angeles, California 90066.

(2) Includes 829,660 shares held of  record by SK Acquisition, Inc., a  Delaware
    corporation  wholly-owned by Mr. Kahn ("SKAI"). Also includes 440,000 shares
    owned by four executive officers of Mercury which SKAI holds a proxy to vote
    and which are  subject to  a security interest  held by  SKAI. See  "Certain
    Transactions." Includes 110,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options
    exercisable  within 60 days from the date hereof. Also includes 8,800 shares
    held of record by Mr. Kahn's wife, as to which Mr. Kahn disclaims beneficial
    ownership.

(3) Includes 22,800 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable  within
    60  days from the date hereof. Includes 110,000 shares beneficially owned by
    Mr. Czyzyk for which Mr.  Czyzyk has granted a proxy  to SKAI and which  are
    subject  to pledges. See "Certain  Transactions." Includes 3,850 shares held
    by Mr. Czyzyk, as custodian for his  children, and 1,100 shares held by  Mr.
    Czyzyk's  spouse's IRA  account with respect  to which  Mr. Czyzyk disclaims
    beneficial ownership.

(4) Includes 22,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable  within
    60  days from the date hereof. Includes 110,000 shares beneficially owned by
    Mr. Ajer  for which  Mr. Ajer  has granted  a proxy  to SKAI  and which  are
    subject to pledges. See "Certain Transactions."

                                       4
<PAGE>
(5)  Includes 22,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within
    60 days from the date hereof. Includes 110,000 shares beneficially owned  by
    Mr.  Walsh for  which Mr. Walsh  has granted a  proxy to SKAI  and which are
    subjected to pledges. See "Certain Transactions."

(6) Includes 27,500 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable  within
    60  days from the date hereof. Includes 110,000 shares beneficially owned by
    Mr. Silva which Mr. Silva has granted a proxy to SKAI and which are  subject
    to pledges. See "Certain Transactions."

(7)  Consists of  11,000 shares  issuable upon  exercise of  options exercisable
    within 60 days from the date hereof.

(8) Includes 66,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable  within
    60 days from the date hereof.

(9)  Consists of  33,000 shares  issuable upon  exercise of  options exercisable
    within 60 days from the date hereof.

(10) Consists of  22,000 shares  issuable upon exercise  of options  exercisable
    within 60 days from the date hereof.

   
(11) Information is as disclosed in a Schedule 13G dated February 15, 1995 filed
    by  Gerald T. Kennedy  for Kennedy Capital Management  pursuant to the rules
    and  regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  under  the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
    

   
(12)  Includes  336,300 shares  issuable  upon exercise  of  options exercisable
    within 60 days from the date hereof.
    

             EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

    Set forth in the table below are  the names, ages and positions held by  all
executive officers of the Company.

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        NAME           AGE                          POSITIONS
- ---------------------  ----  -------------------------------------------------------
<S>                    <C>   <C>
Seymour Kahn            68   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
                              Mercury

Joseph A. Czyzyk        48   President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of
                              Mercury and President of Mercury Air Cargo, Inc.
                              ("Mercury Air Cargo")

Randolph E. Ajer        42   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                              Secretary and Treasurer of Mercury

William L. Silva        45   Executive Vice President of Mercury and Executive Vice
                              President of Maytag Aircraft Corporation ("Maytag")

Kevin J. Walsh          45   Executive Vice President and Senior Vice President of
                              Maytag
</TABLE>
    

    Executive officers of the Company are elected and serve at the discretion of
the  Board of Directors. Set forth below  is a brief description of the business
experience for the  previous five  years of  all executive  officers other  than
Messrs.  Kahn and Czyzyk, who are  also directors and whose business experiences
are described above under the caption "Information Regarding Nominees."

   
    RANDOLPH E. AJER has been Chief Financial Officer of Mercury since 1987  and
Secretary and Treasurer since May 1985. Mr. Ajer served as a director of Mercury
from  September 1989  until December  1990. He  was appointed  an Executive Vice
President of Mercury in November 1990.
    

   
    WILLIAM L. SILVA  served as Director  of Operations of  Maytag from  October
1982  to October  1987 and  was appointed Vice  President of  Maytag in November
1987. Since June 1992, Mr. Silva has been an Executive Vice President of Maytag.
Mr. Silva became an Executive Vice President of Mercury in August 1993.
    

                                       5
<PAGE>
    KEVIN J. WALSH served  as Vice President  of Maytag from  1987 to June  1992
when  he was appointed Senior Vice President  of Maytag. Since January 1992, Mr.
Walsh has been managing the Mercury Service division. Mr. Walsh was appointed an
Executive Vice  President  of Mercury  in  November  1990. Mr.  Walsh  has  been
employed by Mercury in various capacities since 1972.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

    The  following table sets forth the cash compensation paid or accrued by the
Company for the Chairman of the Board  and Chief Executive Officer and for  each
of the four additional most highly compensated executive officers (collectively,
the "named executive officers"):

                           SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
                                                                    --------------------------
                                                                          AWARDS PAYOUTS
                                                                    --------------------------
                                            ANNUAL COMPENSATION     SECURITIES     LONG-TERM
                                 FISCAL    ----------------------   UNDERLYING    COMPENSATION        ALL OTHER
 NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION    YEAR (1)   SALARY ($)   BONUS ($)   OPTIONS (#)   PAYOUTS ($)    COMPENSATION (2)($)
- ------------------------------  --------   ----------   ---------   -----------   ------------   -------------------
<S>                             <C>        <C>          <C>         <C>           <C>            <C>
Seymour Kahn                      1995        300,000     408,000         -0-         -0-              14,362(3)
 Chairman of the Board            1994        230,000     301,500         -0-         -0-               2,536
                                  1993        230,000     196,433     100,000         -0-               2,436

Joseph A. Czyzyk                  1995        271,000     136,000         -0-         -0-              56,030(4)
 Executive Vice President         1994        271,000         -0-         -0-         -0-              54,388
                                  1993        271,000         -0-      25,000         -0-                 288

Randolph E. Ajer                  1995        130,000     258,000         -0-         -0-              55,382(5)
 Executive Vice President         1994        126,500     198,500         -0-         -0-              54,388
                                  1993        126,500      71,092         -0-         -0-                 288

Kevin J. Walsh                    1995        156,000      40,000         -0-         -0-              55,463(6)
 Executive Vice President         1994        144,375      75,000         -0-         -0-              54,188
                                  1993        137,500      10,000         -0-         -0-                 188

William L. Silva                  1995        102,917      37,000         -0-         -0-                 410(7)
 Executive Vice President         1994        100,000      50,000         -0-         -0-                 200
                                  1993         80,000      33,738         -0-         -0-                 100
</TABLE>
    

- ------------------------

(1)  The period July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993 is referred to as Fiscal Year
    1993; the period July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994 is referred to as Fiscal
    Year 1994; and the period July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995 is referred  to
    as Fiscal Year 1995.

(2)   Amounts  reflected  include  Mercury's  contributions  to  a  401(k)  Plan
    maintained for  the  benefit  of  all  employees,  premiums  paid  for  life
    insurance  policies to the  extent such policies  are for the  benefit of an
    executive officer's designated beneficiary and loan forgiveness with respect
    to Mercury financed purchases of Common Stock. See "Certain Transactions."

   
(3) Consists of 401(k) contributions and life insurance premiums in the  amounts
    of $200 and $14,162, respectively.
    

   
(4)   Consists  of  401(k)  contributions,  life  insurance  premiums  and  loan
    forgiveness in the amounts of $200, $1,830 and $54,000, respectively.
    

   
(5)  Consists  of  401(k)  contributions,  life  insurance  premiums  and   loan
    forgiveness in the amounts of $200, $1,182 and $54,000, respectively.
    

   
(6)  Consists of life insurance premiums and  loan forgiveness in the amounts of
    $1,463 and $54,000, respectively.
    

   
(7) Consists of 401(k) contributions and life insurance premiums in the  amounts
    of $200 and $210, respectively.
    

                                       6
<PAGE>
    The following table sets forth information regarding option exercises during
fiscal  year 1995, as  well as the  number and total  of in-the-money options at
June 30, 1995,  for each  of the named  executive officers.  No named  executive
officers were granted options during fiscal year 1995.

            AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR AND
                       FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES (1)

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                VALUE OF
                                                                                    NUMBER OF              UNEXERCISED IN-THE-
                                                                             UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT         MONEY OPTIONS AT
                                           SHARES                              FISCAL YEAR-END (#)      FISCAL YEAR-END ($)(3)(4)
                                        ACQUIRED ON          VALUE          -------------------------   -------------------------
NAME                                    EXERCISE (#)   REALIZED ($)(2)(3)   EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE   EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE
- --------------------------------------  ------------   ------------------   -------------------------   -------------------------
<S>                                     <C>            <C>                  <C>                         <C>
Seymour Kahn..........................       -0-                -0-                110,000/-0-                 688,050/-0-
Joseph A. Czyzyk......................     4,620             31,500                 22,800/-0-                 146,946/-0-
Randolph E. Ajer......................     5,500             30,875                 22,000/-0-                 139,150/-0-
Kevin J. Walsh........................     5,500             32,500                 22,000/-0-                 139,150/-0-
William L. Silva......................       -0-                -0-                 27,500/-0-                 153,807/-0-
</TABLE>
    

- ------------------------
(1) As adjusted for 10% stock dividend, effective June 16, 1995.

(2) In  accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
    amounts set  forth  in  the  "Value  Realized"  column  of  this  table  are
    calculated  by subtracting the exercise price  from the fair market value of
    the underlying Common Stock on the exercise date. The amounts reported  thus
    reflect  the increase in the price of Mercury's common stock from the option
    grant date  to the  option exercise  date, but  do not  necessarily  reflect
    actual proceeds received upon option exercises.

(3) For purposes of this table, fair market value is deemed to be the average of
    the  high and low Common Stock price reported by the American Stock Exchange
    Composite Transactions on the date indicated.

(4) Based upon a fair market value of $8.375 per share at June 30, 1995.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

    Mr. Kahn has an  employment agreement with Mercury  dated as of December  1,
1993  pursuant to  which Mercury will  employ him  as Chairman of  the Board and
Chief Executive  Officer  for  a  three year  period  with  automatic  one  year
extensions  at the end of each year unless either party terminates the agreement
in writing prior  to such renewal.  Under the employment  agreement, Mr.  Kahn's
annual  compensation was  $230,000 from  December 1,  1993 to  December 1, 1994.
Since December 1,  1994, Mr.  Kahn has  been paid  compensation at  the rate  of
$350,000 per year.

    If  Mr.  Kahn  is disabled  for  more  than six  weeks  while  employed, his
compensation will be  reduced by  50%. If  Mr. Kahn  is disabled  for more  than
twelve  months, Mercury  may terminate his  employment with  a severance payment
equal to his  salary for the  lesser of one  year or the  remaining term of  the
employment  agreement.  If Mr.  Kahn's employment  is terminated  without cause,
Mercury will be obligated to pay him  all amounts which would otherwise be  paid
to  him  over the  remaining  term of  the  employment agreement.  Mr.  Kahn may
voluntarily terminate the  employment agreement  and receive  all amounts  which
would  otherwise  be paid  to  him over  the  remaining term  of  the employment
agreement if  any of  the following  events occurs  without Mr.  Kahn's  written
consent,  including: (i)  any person  gains sufficient  control over  the voting
stock of Mercury so as to control Mercury  or the election of a majority of  the
Board  of Directors, (ii) Mercury is  acquired by another entity, either through
the purchase of  Mercury's assets or  stock or a  combination thereof, or  (iii)
Mercury  is  merged or  consolidated with  another entity  or reorganized,  in a
manner in which Mercury's  present status, business or  methods are changed.  If
Mr.  Kahn dies during the term of  the employment agreement, Mercury will pay to
Mr. Kahn's estate  the compensation which  would otherwise be  paid to Mr.  Kahn
through the end of the month in which he dies. In addition, Mercury will pay Mr.
Kahn's estate or

                                       7
<PAGE>
   
other  designated  beneficiary  $2,250,000  upon  his  death.  Relating  to this
obligation, Mercury has obtained a life  insurance policy on Mr. Kahn's life  in
the amount of $2,025,000 which designates Mr. Kahn's wife as beneficiary to fund
this payment.
    

    Mr. Kahn has agreed not to compete with Mercury within a radius of 300 miles
from Mercury's present place of business for five years after the termination of
the  employment agreement. Mercury must make  the severance payments required by
the employment agreement for this non-competition agreement to be effective.

    Mr. Czyzyk has an  employment agreement with Mercury,  dated as of  November
15,  1994,  pursuant to  which Mercury  will employ  him as  its President/Chief
Operating Officer and as the president of Mercury Air Cargo for a term ending on
November 15,  1997, subject  to automatic  one-year extensions  each  successive
November  15,  unless either  party gives  30 days'  notice of  non-renewal. The
agreement provides that Mr. Czyzyk's tenure as President/Chief Operating Officer
shall serve as  a period  of training and  evaluation for  appointment as  Chief
Executive  Officer of Mercury, when  and as such position  may be vacated by Mr.
Kahn, subject to the sole discretion and judgment of the Board of Directors. The
agreement further provides  for the continued  nomination of Mr.  Czyzyk to  the
Board  of Directors  of Mercury,  so long  as Mr.  Czyzyk continues  to serve as
President/Chief Operating Officer.

    Mr. Czyzyk will receive an annual salary of $270,000 plus a bonus at the end
of each fiscal year based  on the following: (i) for  fiscal 1995, in the  event
Mercury's  operating  income on  a consolidated  basis  minus sales  and general
administrative expense and depreciation  (EBIT) for that  year exceeds EBIT  for
fiscal  1994,  then  Mr.  Czyzyk shall  be  paid  a  bonus of  25%  of  his base
compensation, under part I of the Bonus Plan  and 2 1/2% of the amount of  which
fiscal 1995 EBIT exceeds fiscal 1994 EBIT, under part II of the Bonus Plan; (ii)
for  fiscal 1996, part I and  part II of the Bonus  Plan remain in effect except
that the threshold  EBIT is based  on the average  of EBIT for  fiscal 1994  and
1995;  and (iii) for fiscal years subsequent to  fiscal 1996, part I and part II
of the Bonus Plan remain in effect except that the threshold EBIT is based on  a
trailing average of EBIT for the prior three (3) fiscal years.

    In  the event  Mr. Czyzyk's employment  is terminated for  cause, Mr. Czyzyk
will not be entitled to  receive or be paid a  bonus. In the event Mr.  Czyzyk's
employment  is terminated  without cause, Mercury  will be obligated  to pay Mr.
Czyzyk the lesser of one year's base compensation or the base compensation  that
would  otherwise be paid to him over the  remaining term of the agreement, and a
bonus for the fiscal year of termination  in an amount which would otherwise  be
paid to him prorated over the days Mr. Czyzyk was employed by Mercury during the
fiscal  year of termination.  "Cause" is defined in  the employment agreement as
misappropriation  of  corporate  funds,   negligence,  Mr.  Czyzyk's   voluntary
abandonment of his job (other than following a Change in Control) or a breach of
the  employment  agreement. In  the event  of Mr.  Czyzyk's death,  Mr. Czyzyk's
estate or  beneficiary will  be entitled  to  receive the  death benefits  of  a
$1,000,000  insurance  policy, but  all other  obligations under  his employment
agreement will terminate and Mercury's only obligation will be to pay Mr. Czyzyk
or his estate all accrued salary through the  end of the month of his death.  In
the  event  of Mr.  Czyzyk's disability  (as determined  by the  Chief Executive
Officer of Mercury), Mr. Czyzyk's base salary will be reduced by 50% during  the
period  of disability. If  Mr. Czyzyk is disabled  for a period  of more than 12
months (as determined by the Chief  Executive Officer of Mercury), Mercury  will
be  obligated to pay Mr. Czyzyk the same amount that would have been paid to Mr.
Czyzyk if his employment was terminated  without cause, except that all  amounts
paid to Mr. Czyzyk under any long-term disability insurance policy maintained by
Mercury  will be credited as  if paid by Mercury to  Mr. Czyzyk and after giving
effect to any  federal or state  income tax savings  resulting from the  payment
under  a  disability  policy  (as opposed  to  taxable  salary).  The employment
agreement  further  provides  that  Mr.  Czyzyk  may  terminate  his  employment
following  a "Change in Control", in which  event Mr. Czyzyk will be entitled to
be paid the lesser of one year's base compensation or the entire balance of  his
base  compensation remaining to be paid to Mr. Czyzyk over the remaining term of
the agreement.

                                       8
<PAGE>
    Mr. Czyzyk also received a signing bonus in the amount of $100,000 upon  the
execution  of the employment  agreement. The agreement  provides for a five-year
post-employment, non-competition covenant.

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

   
    In November 1994, Mercury acquired from Mr. Czyzyk the outstanding  minority
interest  in Mercury's 80% owned subsidiary,  Mercury Air Cargo. The transaction
included a redemption of 5%  of the capital stock of  Mercury Air Cargo held  by
Mr. Czyzyk in exchange for $450,000 in cash and acquisition of the remaining 15%
of  the  capital stock  of  Mercury Air  Cargo held  by  Mr. Czyzyk  through the
issuance of 225,000 shares of Mercury's common stock valued at $1,406,000 ($6.25
per share, the closing  price of Mercury's  common stock on  the date the  Board
approved  the transaction) for a total  consideration of $1,856,000, $130,000 of
which was  a repayment  of a  September  1994 loan  from Mercury.  In  addition,
concurrent  with the acquisition,  Mercury entered into  an employment agreement
with Mr. Czyzyk. See "-- Employment Agreements."
    

    Pursuant  to  a  Stock  Purchase   Agreement  (the  "First  Stock   Purchase
Agreement")  dated December  10, 1990 between  Mercury, SK  Acquisition, Inc., a
Delaware corporation wholly-owned by Mr. Kahn ("SKAI"), Randolph E. Ajer,  Kevin
J.  Walsh,  Grant G.  Murray,  a former  full-time  employee and  Executive Vice
President of Mercury, and Joseph A.  Czyzyk (the "First Purchasers"), SKAI  sold
110,000  shares  of Common  Stock to  each  of Messrs.  Ajer, Walsh,  Murray and
Czyzyk, at the price of $2.73 per  share, with each purchaser paying a  purchase
price  of $300,000,  or an  aggregate of $1,200,000.  On December  10, 1990, the
closing price of the Common Stock on  the American Stock Exchange was $2.73  per
share.  Pursuant  to  a Stock  Purchase  Agreement (the  "Second  Stock Purchase
Agreement", collectively, the  First and  Second Stock  Purchase Agreements  are
hereinafter  referred to as the "Stock Purchase Agreement") dated August 9, 1993
between Mercury, SKAI and William L.  Silva, SKAI sold 110,000 shares of  Common
Stock  to Mr. Silva at a price of $2.73 per share, with Mr. Silva paying a total
purchase price of $300,000. On August 9,  1993, the closing price of the  Common
Stock  on the  American Stock Exchange  was $2.84  per share. Each  of the First
Purchasers and Mr. Silva (collectively,  the "Purchasers") paid $30,000 cash  at
the  closing of his purchase, or an aggregate of $150,000, and agreed to pay the
remaining $270,000, or an aggregate of  $1,350,000, over a period of five  years
from  the date of purchase, together with interest  at the rate of 10% per annum
on the outstanding  balance. The purchase  price owed  to SKAI is  secured by  a
first security interest in the Common Stock sold to each Purchaser and each such
loan is non-recourse. Each Purchaser has given SKAI an irrevocable proxy to vote
the  Common Stock purchased by him for all purposes until the purchase price for
his Common Stock has been paid in full.

   
    As part of  the Stock  Purchase Agreement, Mercury  has agreed  to loan  the
principal  balance of the unpaid purchase price to each of the Purchasers during
the five-year payment period as each payment is required to be made on March  1,
June  1, September 1 and December 1 of each year until the principal amount owed
by each Purchaser  is paid in  full, which will  occur by the  end of 1995  with
respect  to the First Purchasers and the end  of 1998 with respect to Mr. Silva.
Such loans  are non-recourse,  bear no  interest, and  are secured  by a  second
security interest in the purchased stock. The Purchasers have each agreed to pay
their  own interest on the balance of  the purchase price due SKAI from personal
funds. Commencing March 1, 1994, and annually thereafter, for each of the  First
Purchasers  who  remain  employed by  Mercury,  one-fifth  of his  loan  will be
forgiven. For each First Purchaser who remains employed by Mercury through March
1, 1998, his loan will be forgiven in  full, his shares of Common Stock will  be
owned without any further lien in favor of Mercury or SKAI and the proxy granted
to  SKAI will  expire by  its terms.  Commencing January  1, 1997,  and annually
thereafter, for Mr. Silva  if he remains employed  by Mercury, one-fifth of  his
loan  will be forgiven. If Mr. Silva remains employed by Mercury through January
1, 2001, his loans will be forgiven in full, his shares of Common Stock will  be
owned without any further lien in favor of Mercury or SKAI and the proxy granted
to SKAI will expire by its terms.
    

                                       9
<PAGE>
   
    During  fiscal 1995,  Mercury loaned an  aggregate of $337,500  to the First
Purchasers and Mr. Silva which was used to make the June 1, 1994 through June 1,
1995 payments to SKAI. Amounts outstanding on  the loans made by the Company  as
of June 30, 1995 and September 30, 1995, respectively, were as follows: Mr. Ajer
$121,500  and $135,000, Mr. Walsh $121,500  and 135,000, Mr. Murray $121,500 and
$0, Mr. Czyzyk  $121,500 and $135,000  and Mr. Silva  $94,500 and $108,000.  The
maximum  amounts outstanding on the loans made by the Company during fiscal 1995
were as follows: Mr. Ajer $162,000, Mr. Walsh $162,000, Mr. Murray $162,000, Mr.
Czyzyk $162,000 and Mr. Silva $94,500.
    

    During March 1994 and March 1995, Mercury loaned Mr. Ajer $19,274, Mr. Walsh
$19,143, and  Mr.  Murray $22,491,  which  was  used to  pay  withholding  taxes
associated  with the loan forgiveness under  the First Stock Purchase Agreement.
Such loans bore or bear no interest and were or are being repaid through ratable
payroll deductions over a one-year period.

    On August 1,  1995, Grant G.  Murray and Mercury  entered into an  agreement
("Agreement") in connection with the termination of Mr. Murray's employment. The
Agreement  provides  for the  payment to  Mr. Murray  by Mercury  of the  sum of
$275,000, payable $75,000 upon execution of the Agreement followed by  quarterly
payments  of $50,000  on November  1, 1995,  February 1,  1996, May  1, 1996 and
August 1, 1996.

   
    In consideration  for the  payment of  $275,000, Mr.  Murray transferred  to
Mercury  110,000 shares  acquired by  him pursuant  to the  First Stock Purchase
Agreement and  returned  all stock  options  held  by him.  The  Agreement  also
provides  (i) for the  forgiveness of all debts  or loans owed  by Mr. Murray to
Mercury ($178,000); (ii) for Mr. Murray to procure new business for Mercury  and
to  receive as  compensation a  percentage of net  margins realized  on such new
business; (iii) for  Mr. Murray not  to compete with  Mercury or its  affiliates
until  August 1, 1996;  (iv) for the  continuation of medical  insurance for Mr.
Murray through December, 1995;  (v) for a  release by Mr.  Murray of all  claims
against  Mercury,  including  his claim  with  respect  to an  accrued  bonus of
$60,000; and (vi) for a release by Mercury of all claims against Mr. Murray.  In
consideration  for  SKAI's  facilitating  the  stock  repurchase  transaction by
waiving its  right to  restrict the  transfer  of Mr.  Murray's shares,  and  as
payment  in full of all interest and remaining amounts due to SKAI in connection
with the purchase transaction, Mercury agreed to pay SKAI the amount of $100,000
in the form of options to purchase 30,000 shares of Mercury's Common Stock. Such
options are to be granted at $3.33  below the closing price of Mercury's  Common
Stock  on the American Stock Exchange as of  August 24, 1995 (the date the Board
approved the transaction), and will,  subject to continued employment, vest  and
become  exercisable six  months from  the date  of grant.  Such options  will be
granted subject to: (1) an increase in  the authorized shares of Mercury at  the
next annual meeting of shareholders; and (2) acceptance of the shares underlying
such  options for listing on the American  Stock Exchange. If the conditions for
the issuance of the  options are not  met, Mercury will  reconsider the form  of
payment  of the $100,000 to SKAI. Based  on the consideration paid by Mercury to
Mr. Murray, the effective per share price paid by Mercury for the 110,000 shares
acquired from Mr. Murray  was approximately $4.12. The  per share price paid  by
Mercury  will be  increased by  an additional $.91  per share  when the $100,000
amount becomes payable to SKAI, in options or otherwise.
    

   
    During  Fiscal  1995,  Mercury  sold  approximately  $211,000  in  fuel   to
Millionaire  of Long Beach, a company owned  by Mr. Murray. The sales prices for
such fuel were based on cost plus a normal competitive mark-up, but the level of
credit extended may have been greater  than what would have been available  from
an unaffiliated party. Mercury has been paid in full for the fuel purchases.
    

    Mercury  has Indemnity Agreements  with each of  its directors and executive
officers which require Mercury,  among other things,  to indemnify them  against
certain  liabilities that  may arise  by reason  of their  status or  service as
directors,  officers,  employees  or  agents  of  Mercury,  and,  under  certain
circumstances,  to advance  their expenses incurred  as a  result of proceedings
brought against

                                       10
<PAGE>
them. In  order to  be entitled  to indemnification,  the executive  officer  or
director  must  have acted  in a  manner reasonably  believed to  be in,  or not
opposed to,  the best  interests of  Mercury  and, with  respect to  a  criminal
matter, in a manner which he had no reason to believe was illegal.

   
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
    

   
    During  fiscal 1995,  directors who were  not employees of  the Company were
paid $1,000 per meeting with an annual minimum of $7,500 in fees paid in advance
on the annual  meeting date. Directors  were also reimbursed  for their  travel,
meals,  lodging and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending
Board meetings. In addition,  during fiscal 1995  and continuing through  fiscal
1996, the law firm of McBreen, McBreen & Kopko, of which Mr. Kopko is a partner,
has  been providing legal services to the Company at its standard billing rates.
See "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation."
    

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

   
    The Company's Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. List and Kopko  and
Dr.  Fagan. During fiscal 1995  and the six months  ended December 31, 1995, the
Company paid  $5,534 and  $10,351, respectively,  to the  law firm  of  McBreen,
McBreen & Kopko for legal services.
    

                      REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
                           OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    This  report of the Compensation Committee  shall not be deemed incorporated
by reference  by any  general statement  incorporating by  reference this  Proxy
Statement  into any filing made by the  Company under the Securities Act of 1933
or under the  Securities Exchange Act  of 1934,  except to the  extent that  the
Company  specifically incorporates this information  by reference, and shall not
otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

    Under the rules established by  the Securities and Exchange Commission,  the
Company  is  required  to provide  certain  data and  information  regarding the
compensation and benefits provided  to the Company's Chairman  of the board  and
Chief  Executive Officer, Mr.  Kahn, and the four  other most highly compensated
executive officers,  Messrs.  Czyzyk,  Ajer, Walsh  and  Silva.  The  disclosure
requirements  for the named executive  officers include the use  of tables and a
report explaining  the  rationale and  considerations  that led  to  fundamental
executive  compensation decisions affecting those individuals. In fulfillment of
this requirement, the Compensation Committee, at  the direction of the Board  of
Directors,  has  prepared  the  following report  for  inclusion  in  this Proxy
Statement.

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

   
    This report reflects  the Company's compensation  philosophy as endorsed  by
the  Compensation Committee and  resulting actions taken by  the Company for the
reporting periods  shown  in the  various  compensation tables  supporting  this
report.  The Compensation Committee  determines salary and  bonus amounts, other
award levels  and  benefits  for  all executive  officers  of  the  Company.  In
connection  with its decisions, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers
the written recommendations  of the Company's  Chairman of the  Board and  Chief
Executive  Officer, Mr. Kahn. As described below,  a large portion of Mr. Kahn's
compensation is  based  on  the earnings  of  the  Company and  Mr.  Kahn  is  a
significant  shareholder of the Company. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee
believes that Mr.  Kahn's recommendations are  consistent with the  Compensation
Committee's  philosophy of  encouraging earnings growth  and strategic decisions
designed to maximize shareholder return.
    

    The executive compensation programs of the Company have been designed to:

    - Embody a  pay  for  performance  policy  where  compensation  amounts  are
      affected  by  corporate,  operating  unit  and  individual  performance as
      measured by earnings;

    - Motivate key senior executives  to achieve strategic business  initiatives
      and reward them for their achievements;

                                       11
<PAGE>
   
    - Provide  compensation  opportunities which  are,  in the  judgment  of the
      Compensation Committee,  comparable  to  those offered  by  other  leading
      companies,  thus allowing the  Company to compete  for and retain talented
      executives who are critical to the Company's long-term success; and
    

    - Align  the  interest  of  executives  with  long-term  interests  of   the
      shareholders through common stock ownership and stock option programs.

COMPENSATION MECHANISMS

    At  present,  the executive  compensation  program is  comprised  of salary,
annual cash bonus  programs, long-term  incentive opportunities in  the form  of
Company  financed  stock ownership  opportunities  and stock  options  and other
benefits typically provided to executives by major corporations.

   
    Executive officer salaries are  determined based on individual  performance,
position  tenure, salary  history, internal comparability  considerations and in
some instances the results of arm's  length negotiations in connection with  the
start-up  of a  new operating  unit. In  determining salaries,  the Compensation
Committee uses  the personal  knowledge of  its members  regarding  compensation
levels  for similar  positions at  other companies  generally. No  peer group or
other salary  surveys  were  undertaken  to  determine  salaries  at  comparable
companies.   For  each  executive  officer,   a  significant  portion  of  total
compensation is a bonus  based on the  earnings of the  Company or the  specific
operating  unit for which he has profit  and loss statement responsibility. As a
result,  an  executive  officer's  compensation  can  vary  substantially   from
year-to-year  based on  the Company's  or a  specific operating  unit's earnings
performance. Except as described below, for fiscal 1995 and 1996, the bonus  for
executive  officers with operating  unit responsibility was/will  be based on an
individual's success in exceeding the budgeted earnings for his operating  unit.
The  budgeted earnings for each unit are based on a comprehensive review of unit
operations conducted  by Messrs.  Kahn,  Czyzyk, and  Ajer and  the  responsible
executive  officer at the start of each  fiscal year and are subject to approval
by the Board of Directors. During the budget process, Messrs. Kahn, Czyzyk,  and
Ajer  focus on challenging  each executive officer to  attain revenue growth and
cost savings for  his operating  unit. As described  below, the  bonus plan  for
Messrs.  Kahn,  Czyzyk, and  Ajer is  based on  exceeding the  Company's average
earnings for the prior three years,  encouraging Messrs. Kahn, Czyzyk, and  Ajer
to  budget  for  aggressive  growth.  The  Compensation  Committee  also retains
discretion to  reward  exceptional achievement  through  discretionary  bonuses.
During  fiscal 1995, the Compensation Committee  awarded one executive officer a
bonus for operating unit results in excess of budget. A second executive officer
had met,  but  not exceeded  his  budget. However,  the  Compensation  Committee
awarded  the officer a discretionary bonus based on his strong efforts in laying
the foundation for additional growth in his unit.
    

    Each of the Company's executive officers is also compensated in part through
Company financed common stock ownership and stock options. The Company currently
has in place the 1990 Long-Term  Incentive Plan which provides for stock  option
grants  to key employees (other than Mr.  Kahn) at the current fair market value
on the date of grant. Each  of the Company's executive officers currently  holds
options  granted under  the plan. Option  awards to each  executive officer have
been based  on the  executive's level  of responsibility,  past performance  and
internal  comparability considerations.  In addition,  the Company  is currently
financing the purchase of 110,000 shares of Common Stock at $2.73 per share  for
each  executive officer  (other than Mr.  Kahn). The shares  are being purchased
from SKAI,  a  corporation  wholly-owned  by  Mr.  Kahn.  Subject  to  continued
employment, each executive officer will have fully-paid for the Common Stock and
all  loans made by the Company to facilitate the stock purchase will be forgiven
seven years  from  the  date of  the  purchase.  In addition  to  serving  as  a
compensation  device,  the  stock purchase  program  was designed  to  insure an
orderly transition in control of the Company, to avoid excessive dilution and to
some degree to  maintain internal  comparability in officer  compensation. As  a
result of the stock options and company financed stock purchases, each executive
officer  has a strong incentive to continue his association with the Company and
to enhance the value of the Company's equity securities in the long-term.

                                       12
<PAGE>
    During fiscal 1995,  the executive officers  requested assistance in  paying
taxes  associated with the  annual forgiveness of the  stock purchase loans. The
compensation Committee  determined that  each  executive vice  president  should
invest  in  his own  future  and the  Company  by personally  bearing  the taxes
associated  with  the  loan  forgiveness.  The  Compensation  Committee  agreed,
however, to somewhat mitigate the cash flow effects of the withholding for taxes
by  providing annual, interest-free loans to be  paid back from bonus or payroll
deductions. See "Certain Transactions."

FISCAL 1995 COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

   
    Mr. Kahn has an employment agreement  with the Company dated as of  December
1,  1993 pursuant to which Mercury will employ  him as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive  Officer  for  a  three year  period  with  automatic  one  year
extensions  at the end of each year unless either party terminates the agreement
in writing prior  to such renewal.  Under the employment  agreement, Mr.  Kahn's
annual  compensation was  $230,000 from  December 1,  1993 to  December 1, 1994.
Pursuant to a decision  of the Compensation Committee  on December 1, 1994,  Mr.
Kahn's annual compensation was increased, as of that date, to $350,000 per year.
The  Compensation  Committee  based  Mr.  Kahn's  compensation  on  the policies
described above. In determining the  compensation of Mr. Kahn, the  Compensation
Committee  weighed the following factors more  heavily than the others: internal
comparability considerations, the Company's profitability and the performance of
the Company's common stock. The Compensation Committee also weighed heavily  its
assessment  of  Mr.  Kahn's  individual performance  and  leadership  within the
Company, and the longevity of his service to the Company.
    

    A cash bonus plan  for Mr. Kahn  was approved by the  Board of Directors  in
November 1990 (commencing fiscal 1991). The Compensation Committee continued the
bonus  plan during fiscal  1995 and will  continue the bonus  plan during fiscal
1996. The two-part  bonus plan is  based on earnings  before interest and  taxes
("EBIT")  of the Company  for the year  in which the  bonus is calculated. Under
Part I of the bonus plan, if the bonus year's EBIT meets or exceeds the trailing
three-year EBIT average, Mr.  Kahn is entitled  to a bonus equal  to 25% of  his
salary.  For years where  EBIT falls below the  trailing three-year average, any
bonus paid  to  Mr.  Kahn  is  solely at  the  discretion  of  the  Compensation
Committee.  Under Part II of the bonus plan,  an additional bonus is paid to Mr.
Kahn in an amount equal to 6.67% of any increase in the bonus year's EBIT  level
over the trailing three-year average EBIT level.

    For fiscal 1995, Mr. Kahn earned a bonus in the amount of $448,000 under the
bonus  plan.  At  Mr.  Kahn's  request,  the  Compensation  Committee,  however,
re-allocated $40,000 of  Mr. Kahn's  earned bonus, as  a special  bonus for  Mr.
Ajer, and paid Mr. Kahn a bonus of $408,000. Mr. Kahn made this request based on
his  personal appreciation of  Mr. Ajer's over-all  contribution to the Company.
The Compensation  Committee  felt Mr.  Kahn's  perceptions regarding  merit  and
personal generosity should be respected.

OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

    Mr.  Czyzyk  is compensated  pursuant to  an employment  agreement described
under "Employment Agreements." A  cash bonus plan for  Mr. Ajer was approved  by
the   Board  of  Directors  in  November  1990  (commencing  fiscal  1991).  The
Compensation Committee  continued the  bonus plan  during fiscal  1995 and  will
continue the bonus plan during fiscal 1996. As with Mr. Kahn, the two-part bonus
plan  is  based on  EBIT of  the  Company for  the year  in  which the  bonus is
calculated. Under Part I of  the bonus plan, if the  bonus year's EBIT meets  or
exceeds  the trailing three-year EBIT  average, Mr. Ajer is  entitled to a bonus
equal to  25% of  his salary.  For years  where EBIT  falls below  the  trailing
three-year  average, any bonus paid  to Mr. Ajer is  solely at the discretion of
the Compensation Committee. Under Part II of the bonus plan, an additional bonus
is paid to Mr.  Ajer in an amount  equal to 3.33% of  any increase in the  bonus
year's  EBIT level over  the trailing three-year average  EBIT level. For fiscal
1995, Mr. Ajer earned a  bonus in the amount of  $218,000 under the bonus  plan.
Due  to the reallocation of $40,000 of Mr. Kahn's bonus, as described above, Mr.
Ajer was paid a total bonus of $258,000.

                                       13
<PAGE>
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 162(M)

    Section 162(m)  of the  Internal  Revenue Code,  generally disallows  a  tax
deduction  to public companies for annual compensation over $1 million paid to a
corporation's chief executive  officer and  four other  most highly  compensated
individuals.  Qualifying performance-based  compensation will not  be subject to
the deduction  limit  if  certain  requirements are  met.  Because  the  current
compensation  levels of the  Company's executive officers are  well below the $1
million threshold, the Compensation Committee has not determined what steps  are
required  to structure qualifying performance-based  compensation and whether or
not the required steps would be in the best interest of the Company.

                                          COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS

                                          Robert L. List
   
                                          Frederick H. Kopko, Jr.
                                          Dr. Philip J. Fagan, Jr.
    

                                       14
<PAGE>
                         STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH

    The Stock  Price Performance  Graph  set forth  below  shall not  be  deemed
incorporated  by reference by  any general statement  incorporating by reference
this Proxy Statement into  any filing made by  the Company under the  Securities
Act  of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, except to the extent
that the Company  specifically incorporates this  information by reference,  and
shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

    The graph below compares cumulative total return of Mercury Air Group, Inc.,
the AMEX Market Value and the S & P Transportation Index.

                COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
              AMONG MERCURY AIR GROUP, THE AMEX MARKET VALUE INDEX
                        AND THE S&P TRANSPORTATION INDEX

EDGAR REPRESENTATION OF DATA POINTS USED IN PRINTED GRAPHIC

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            6/90       6/91       6/92       6/93       6/94       6/95
<S>                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
MERCURY AIR GROUP               100        147         76        141        253        435
AMEX MARKET VALUE               100         99        105        120        117        138
S&P TRANSPORTATION              100        105        128        146        152        167
</TABLE>

* $100  Invested  on  06/30/90  in Stock  or  Index,  including  reinvestment of
  dividends. Fiscal year ending June 30.

                             SECTION 16 DISCLOSURE

   
    Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the  Company's
officers  and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Common
Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities
and Exchange Commission  and the American  Stock Exchange. Based  solely on  its
review  of the copies of  such forms received by  it, or written representations
from certain reporting persons that  no annual corrective filings were  required
for  those persons, the Company believes that all filing requirements applicable
to its officers, directors and  greater than ten-percent beneficial owners  were
complied  with, except that Mr. List failed to timely file a report with respect
to one transaction.
    

                                       15
<PAGE>
      PROPOSAL 2 -- AMENDMENT OF THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
          TO INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

    The Board of Directors recommends  that the shareholders approve a  proposal
to  amend  the  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of  the  Company  (the
"Certificate") to increase the  authorized shares of  Mercury Common Stock  from
9,000,000 shares to 18,000,000 shares.

   
    At  January 31,  1996, there were  5,380,087 shares of  Mercury Common Stock
outstanding and an  additional 3,600,493  were reserved for  issuance, of  which
2,803,308  shares of Common Stock were  reserved for issuance upon conversion of
the Company's  7  3/4% Convertible  Subordinated  Debentures due  2006,  280,500
shares  of Common Stock were reserved for  issuance upon the exercise of options
granted or to be granted under the Company's 1990 Director's Stock Option  Plan,
220,380  shares of Common Stock were reserved  for issuance upon the exercise of
options granted or to  be granted under the  Company's 1990 Long-Term  Incentive
Stock  Plan, 110,000 shares of Common Stock  were reserved for issuance upon the
exercise of a Non-Qualified Stock Option  dated January 31, 1993, 18,335  shares
of Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of a certain Common
Stock  Purchase Warrant  dated January  20, 1994,  and 167,970  shares of Common
Stock were  reserved  for  issuance  upon conversion  of  a  debenture.  If  the
amendment  is adopted,  approximately 9,019,420  shares of  Mercury Common Stock
would be authorized and unissued.
    

   
    The Company may utilize  up to 30,000 shares  of Common Stock in  connection
with  options to be granted to SKAI, a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. Kahn. See
"Executive   Officers,   Compensation   and   Other   Information   --   Certain
Transactions."  In addition, the Company has, contingent upon an increase in the
authorized number of  shares of Common  Stock, agreed to  issue to certain  non-
executive  officers stock  awards consisting  of a  total of  100,000 restricted
shares of Common Stock.
    

   
    There are no pre-emptive rights relating to the Mercury Common Stock. Except
to the extent  that the Company  may issue  the shares of  Mercury Common  Stock
reserved  therefor pursuant to its stock option plans, and, except to the extent
the Company may issue securities  in connection with the transactions  described
above, the Company has not entered into any agreement or understandings, and has
no present plans, for the issuance of additional shares of Mercury Common Stock,
but  wishes to have such  shares available for future  issuances as the need may
arise. No further shareholder approval would  be required prior to the  issuance
of the additional shares authorized by this amendment.
    

    The  Board's purpose in  proposing the increase in  the number of authorized
shares of Mercury Common Stock is to have shares available for future  issuances
from  time to time in connection  with the financing transaction described above
or in other instances as and when  the Board determines that such issuances  may
be  desirable. The  Securities and Exchange  Commission requires  the Company to
discuss how such  shares could be  used to make  it more difficult  to effect  a
change  in control of the Company. For example, the additional shares of Mercury
Common Stock could be used to dilute the stock ownership of a person seeking  to
obtain  control of the Company or could  be privately placed with purchasers who
would support the Board in opposing a hostile takeover attempt. This proposal to
amend the Certificate is not in response  to any effort of which the Company  is
aware  to accumulate Mercury Common Stock or  obtain control of the Company, nor
is it part of a plan by  management to recommend a series of similar  amendments
to  the  Board  of Directors  and  shareholders.  The Board  does  not presently
contemplate recommending the adoption of any other amendments to the Certificate
which could be construed to affect the ability of third parties to take over  or
change control of the Company.

    In  addition to  Mercury Common  Stock, under  the current  Certificate, the
Company is authorized to  issue 3,000,000 shares of  Preferred Stock, par  value
$.01  per  share ("Preferred  Stock").  There are  currently  no shares  of such
Preferred Stock outstanding.

    Approval of  this  amendment  to  the Certificate  requires  approval  by  a
majority  of the shares of  Mercury Common Stock entitled  to vote thereon. As a
result, any  shares  not  voted  (whether  by  abstention,  broker  non-vote  or
otherwise) will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

                                       16
<PAGE>
    Your  Board of Directors recommends a vote  FOR the proposal to approve this
Amendment.

             INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   
    The Company's  independent  public accountants  for  fiscal year  1995  were
Deloitte  &  Touche and  the  Board of  Directors  of the  Company  has selected
Deloitte & Touche  as the  Company's independent public  accountants for  fiscal
year  1996. Representatives of Deloitte  & Touche are expected  to be present at
the Meeting and will have an opportunity to respond to appropriate questions and
to make a statement if they desire to do so.
    

                     ANNUAL REPORT ON FORMS 10-K AND 10-K/A

   
    Any shareholder of record  on February 14,  1996 may request  at no cost  to
such shareholder a copy of the Annual Report on Forms 10-K and 10-K/A filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission by mailing such  request to Randolph E.
Ajer, Secretary, Mercury Air Group, Inc., 5456 McConnell Avenue, Suite 100,  Los
Angeles,   California  90066.  Such  request  must  indicate  the  name  of  the
shareholder, the amount of shares held on  February 14, 1996 and the address  to
which the Forms 10-K and 10-K/A are to be sent.
    

                 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

   
    Any  shareholder proposal  intended to  be presented  at the  Company's next
annual meeting  must be  received by  Randolph  E. Ajer,  the Secretary  of  the
Company,  at 5456 McConnell Avenue, Suite 100, Los Angeles, California 90066, no
later than               , 1996 in order  to be considered for inclusion in  the
proxy statement and form of proxy for such meeting.
    

                                 OTHER MATTERS

    Management knows of no other matters to be presented at the Meeting which is
a  proper subject for action by the  shareholders. However, if any other matters
should properly come  before the  Meeting, it is  intended that  proxies in  the
accompanying  form will be voted thereon in  accordance with the judgment of the
person or persons voting such proxies.

   
    The Annual Report to Shareholders of  the Company for the fiscal year  ended
June  30,  1995 was  recently transmitted  to the  shareholders of  the Company.
Except to the extent that portions of such report are specifically referenced in
this Proxy Statement,  such report  is not to  be regarded  as proxy  soliciting
material and is not incorporated in this Proxy Statement.
    

                                          By Order of the Board of Directors

                                          Randolph E. Ajer
                                          SECRETARY

Los Angeles, California
   
February   , 1996
    

   
                   [Balance of page intentionally left blank]
    

                                       17
<PAGE>

                             MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.

                 PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                       FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


     The undersigned shareholder of Mercury Air Group, Inc., a New York
corporation (the "Company"), acting under the New York General Corporation Law,
hereby constitutes and appoints Seymour Kahn and Randolph E. Ajer, and each of
them, the attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, each with the power of
substitution, to attend and act for the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of the Company (the "Meeting") to be held on March 21, 1996 at
10:00 A.M., Pacific Standard Time, at the Company's headquarters located at
5456 McConnell Avenue, Suite 100, Los Angeles, California 90066 and at any
adjournments thereof, and in connection therewith to vote and represent all of
the shares of Common Stock of the Company which the undersigned would be
entitled to vote, as specified on the reverse side.
     Said attorneys and proxies, and each of them, shall have all the powers
which the undersigned would have if acting in person. The undersigned hereby
revokes any other proxy to vote at the Meeting and hereby ratifies and confirms
all that said attorneys and proxies, and each of them, may lawfully do by virtue
hereof. Said proxies, without hereby limiting their general authority, are
specifically authorized to vote in accordance with their best judgement with
respect to matters incident to the conduct of the Meeting; matters presented at
the Meeting but which are not known to the Board of Directors at the time of the
solicitation of this Proxy; and with respect to the election of any person as a
director if a bona fide nominee for that office is named in the Proxy Statement
and such nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve.

                   IMPORTANT -- PLEASE SIGN ON THE OTHER SIDE.

<PAGE>

/X/ PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTES AS IN THIS EXAMPLE.

PROPOSAL 1.    Election of Directors:   Seymour Kahn, Joseph A. Czyzyk,
                                        Dr. Philip J. Fagan, Jr., Frederick H.
                                        Kopko, Jr., William G. Langton and
                                        Robert L. List.

/ /   FOR ALL NOMINEES (EXCEPT AS MARKED TO THE CONTRARY BELOW).

/ /   WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES.

INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any nominee, write that
nominee's name in the space provided. ________________________________________

PROPOSAL 2.    Amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation
to increase from 9,000,000 to 18,000,000 the number of authorized shares of
Mercury Common Stock.

/ /   FOR    / /   AGAINST    / /   ABSTAIN

A majority of the above-named proxies present at the Meeting, either in person
or by substitute (or if only one thereof shall be present and act, then that
one), shall have and exercise all the powers of said proxies hereunder. This
proxy will be voted in accordance with the choices specified by the undersigned
above. IF NO INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRARY ARE INDICATED HEREON, THIS PROXY WILL
BE TREATED AS A GRANT OF AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NAMED ABOVE AND FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION.

The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Notice of Annual
Meeting and Proxy Statement and a copy of the Company's previously-delivered
Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended June 30, 1995.

DATE:
      -------------------------------------------------

SHAREHOLDERS SIGNATURE(S)

- -------------------------------------------------------

- -------------------------------------------------------

IMPORTANT. Sign your name or names on the signature line in the same way it is
stenciled on this proxy.



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission