JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO
U-1/A, 1996-07-24
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: SUMMIT FAMILY RESTAURANTS INC, 15-12G, 1996-07-24
Next: KANEB SERVICES INC, S-8, 1996-07-24









                                        Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to  
                                                     SEC File No. 70-8289  



                          SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                WASHINGTON, DC  20549

                                       FORM U-1

                                     APPLICATION

                                        UNDER

                THE PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935 ("Act")

                         GPU Generation Corporation ("GENCO")
                                  1001 Broad Street
                            Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15907

                    JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ("JCP&L")
                                  300 Madison Avenue
                            Morristown, New Jersey  07960

                        METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY ("MET-ED")
                      PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY ("PENELEC")
                                 2800 Pottsville Pike
                            Reading, Pennsylvania 19640          
                    (Names of companies filing this statement and
                      addresses of principal executive offices)

                         GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORPORATION ("GPU")      

            (Name of top registered holding company parent of applicants)



          T. G. Howson, Vice President       S. L. Guibord, Secretary
            and Treasurer                    Metropolitan Edison Company
          M. A. Nalewako, Secretary          Pennsylvania Electric Company
          M. J. Connolly, Esq., Director     P.O. Box 16001
            of Legal Services                Reading, Pennsylvania 19640
          GPU Service Corporation
          100 Interpace Parkway              Douglas E. Davidson, Esq.
          Parsippany, New Jersey  07054      Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP
                                             120 West 45th Street
          S. L. Guibord, Secretary           New York, New York  10036
          Jersey Central Power & Light
           Company
          300 Madison Avenue
          Morristown, New Jersey  07960

                                                                          

                     (Names and addresses of agents for service)<PAGE>





               GENCO,  JCP&L,  Met-Ed and  Penelec  hereby post-effectively

          amend their Application on Form U-1, docketed in SEC File No. 70-

          8289, as heretofore amended, as follows:

               1.   By amending paragraph F of Post-Effective Amendment No.

          1 thereof to read in its entirety as follows:

          ITEM 2.   FEES, COMMISSIONS AND EXPENSES.

                    The estimated fees,  commissions and expenses  expected

          to be incurred  in connection with the proposed  transactions are

          as follows:


                    Filing fees - Securities and Exchange
                      Commission                                   $ 2,000 
                    Legal fees:
                      Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP                5,000 
                    Miscellaneous                                    1,000 
                      Total                                       $  8,000 


               2.   By  adding new paragraph  P to Post-Effective Amendment

          No. 1 thereof to read in its entirety as follows:

                    P.   GPU  submits that all of the  criteria of Rules 53

          and  54 under the Act  with respect to  the proposed transactions

          are satisfied:

                         (i)  The  average  consolidated retained  earnings

          for  GPU  and its  subsidiaries, as  reported  for the  four most

          recent  quarterly periods in GPU's Annual Report on Form 10-K for

          the  year ended December 31,  1995 and Quarterly  Reports on Form

          10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 1995, September 30, 1995 and

          March 31, 1996,  as filed  under the  Securities Exchange  Act of

          1934, was approximately $1.99 billion.  As of June 30,  1996, GPU

          had invested, or  committed to invest, directly or indirectly, an

          aggregate  of  approximately  $241  million in  exempt  wholesale


                                         -1-<PAGE>





          generators ("EWGs") and $673 million in foreign utility companies

          ("FUCOs"),  which  as  of that  date  would  permit  GPU to  make

          additional  such  investments of  approximately $113  million and

          remain  within the  50% ("safe  harbor") limitation  of  Rule 53.

          GPU's aggregate  investment in EWGs and  FUCOs, including amounts

          invested pursuant to all outstanding or pending authorizations to

          make investments in EWGs or FUCOs will not at any time exceed the

          "safe  harbor"  limitation  imposed  by  Rule  53  without  prior

          Commission authorization.

                         (ii) GPU maintains books  and records to  identify

          investments in, and earnings from, each EWG  and FUCO in which it

          directly or indirectly holds an interest.

                              (A)  For  each United States EWG in which GPU

          directly or indirectly holds an interest:

                                   (1)  the books and  records for such EWG

          will be kept in conformity with  United States generally accepted

          accounting principles ("GAAP");

                                   (2)  the  financial  statements will  be

          prepared in accordance with GAAP; and

                                   (3)  GPU   directly   or   through   its

          subsidiaries undertakes to provide  the Commission access to such

          books and records  and financial statements as the Commission may

          request.

                              (B)  For each FUCO or  foreign EWG which is a

          majority-owned subsidiary of GPU:

                                   (1)  the  books  and  records  for  such

          subsidiary will be kept in accordance with GAAP;



                                         -2-<PAGE>





                                   (2)  the  financial statements  for such

          subsidiary will be prepared in accordance with GAAP; and

                                   (3)  GPU   directly   or   through   its

          subsidiaries undertakes to provide  the Commission access to such

          books and records and financial statements, or  copies thereof in

          English, as the Commission may request.

                              (C)   For  each FUCO or foreign EWG  in which

          GPU owns  50% or less of  the voting securities, GPU  directly or

          through  its subsidiaries  will  proceed in  good  faith, to  the

          extent reasonable under the circumstances, to cause

                                   (1)  such entity to  maintain books  and

          records in accordance with GAAP;

                                   (2)  the  financial  statements of  such

          entity to be prepared in accordance with GAAP; and

                                   (3)  access by  the  Commission to  such

          books and records and financial statements (or copies thereof) in

          English as the  Commission may  request and, in  any event,  will

          provide the Commission on request copies of such materials as are

          made available to GPU and its subsidiaries.  If and to the extent

          that such entity's books, records or financial statements are not

          maintained in accordance with GAAP, GPU will, upon request of the

          Commission,  describe  and   quantify  each  material   variation

          therefrom  as and to the extent required by subparagraphs (a) (2)

          (iii) (A) and (a) (2) (iii) (B) of Rule 53.

                         (iii)  No  more than 2%  of GPU's domestic  public

          utility subsidiary  employees will render  any services, directly

          or  indirectly, to  any  EWG or  FUCO in  which  GPU directly  or

          indirectly holds an interest.

                                         -3-<PAGE>





                         (iv) Copies of this Application are being provided

          to the  New Jersey  Board of  Public Utilities,  the Pennsylvania

          Public  Utility  Commission  and  the  New  York  Public  Service

          Commission, the only federal,  state or local regulatory agencies

          having  jurisdiction  over the  retail  rates  of GPU's  electric

          utility  subsidiaries.  In addition, GPU will submit to each such

          commission copies of any Rule 24 certificates required hereunder,

          as well as a  copy of Item 9 of GPU's Form U5S and Exhibits G and

          H thereof  (commencing with  the  Form U5S  to be  filed for  the

          calendar  year in  which  the authorization  herein requested  is

          granted).

                         (v)  None of  the provisions of  paragraph (b)  of

          Rule 53 render  paragraph (a)  of that  Rule unavailable for  the

          proposed transactions.

                              (A)  Neither GPU nor any subsidiary of GPU is

          the subject of any pending bankruptcy or similar proceeding.

                              (B)  GPU's   average  consolidated   retained

          earnings   for   the   four   most   recent   quarterly   periods

          (approximately   $1.99  billion)   represented  an   increase  of

          approximately $199 million (or  approximately 11%) in the average

          consolidated retained  earnings for  the previous four  quarterly

          periods (approximately $1.79 billion).

                              (C)  GPU did not incur operating  losses from

          direct  or  indirect investments  in EWGs  and  FUCOs in  1995 in

          excess of 5% of GPU's consolidated retained earnings.

                         (vi) In accordance with Rule 54,  the requirements

          of Rule 53(a), (b) and (c) are fulfilled.



                                         -4-<PAGE>







               3.   By filing the following exhibits in Item 6(a) thereof:

                    F-1(a)    Opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP.

                    F-2(a)    Opinion of Michael J. Connolly, Esq.

















































                                         -5-<PAGE>





                                      SIGNATURE

                    PURSUANT  TO THE  REQUIREMENTS  OF  THE PUBLIC  UTILITY

          HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935, THE UNDERSIGNED COMPANIES  HAVE DULY

          CAUSED  THIS STATEMENT TO BE SIGNED ON THEIR BEHALF BY THE UNDER-

          SIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.



                                        GPU GENERATION CORPORATION 
                                        JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
                                        METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
                                        PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY


                                        By:  ________________________________
                                             T. G. Howson
                                             Vice President and Treasurer


          Date:  July 24, 1996<PAGE>







                            EXHIBITS TO BE FILED BY EDGAR



          Exhibits:

                    F-1(a)    Opinion of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP.

                    F-2(a)    Opinion of Michael J. Connolly, Esq.<PAGE>







                   (Letterhead of Berlack, Israels & Liberman LLP)


                                                             Exhibit F-1(a)



                                             July 24, 1996



          Securities and Exchange Commission
          450 Fifth Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C.  20549

                    Re:  GPU Generation Corporation
                         Jersey Central Power & Light Company
                         Metropolitan Edison Company
                         Pennsylvania Electric Company
                         Application on Form U-1 
                         SEC File No. 70-8289                    

          Dear Sirs:

                    We  have examined Post-Effective Amendment No. 1, dated
          April 17, 1996, to the Application on Form U-1, dated October 14,
          1993, under the Public  Utility Holding Company Act of  1935 (the
          "Act"), filed  by  GPU Generation  Corporation ("GENCO"),  Jersey
          Central  Power &  Light  Company  ("JCP&L"), Metropolitan  Edison
          Company ("Met-Ed") and Pennsylvania Electric  Company ("Penelec";
          together with  JCP&L and Met-Ed, the  "Operating Companies") with
          the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "Commission")  and
          docketed by the Commission in SEC File No. 70-8289, as amended by
          Post-Effective  Amendment No. 2 thereto,  dated May 17, 1996, and
          as to be amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 thereto, dated
          this  date,  of  which  this  opinion is  to  be  a  part.   (The
          Application,  as so  amended  and  as  thus  to  be  amended,  is
          hereinafter referred to as the "Application".)

                    The Application now  contemplates, among other  things,
          the  entering   into  by  GENCO  of   operation  and  maintenance
          agreements  with non-utility generating  facilities with which an
          Operating Company has entered into a power purchase agreement.

                    In  addition to the  matters set forth  in our previous
          opinion dated  December 7, 1993 and  filed as Exhibit  F-1 to the
          Application,  we  have  examined  copies,  signed,  certified  or
          otherwise  proven  to  our   satisfaction,  of  the  articles  of
          incorporation and by-laws of GENCO and a copy of the Commission's
          Order, dated December 15, 1993, granting the Application, as then
          amended.  In  addition, we have examined such  other instruments,
          agreements and documents  and made such other investigation as we
          have deemed necessary as a basis for this opinion.<PAGE>





          Securities and Exchange Commission
          July 24, 1996
          Page 2



                    For  many  years,  we  have  participated   in  various
          proceedings relating  to the issuance  and sale of  securities by
          General   Public   Utilities   Corporation   ("GPU")    and   its
          subsidiaries,  and  we  are  familiar  with  the  terms  of   the
          outstanding securities  of the  corporations  comprising the  GPU
          holding company system.

                    We are members of the Bar  of the State of New York and
          do not purport to be expert in the laws of any jurisdiction other
          than  the laws of the  State of New York and  the Federal laws of
          the United States.   With respect to all matters  of Pennsylvania
          law,  we have relied on the opinion of Michael J. Connolly, Esq.,
          which is being filed as Exhibit F-2(a) to the Application.

                    Based  upon  the  foregoing,  and  assuming   that  the
          transactions therein proposed are  carried out in accordance with
          the Application, we are  of the opinion that when  the Commission
          shall have entered an order forthwith granting the Application, 

                    (a)  all   State  laws   applicable  to   the  proposed
                         transactions will have been complied with; and

                    (b)  the consummation  of the transactions  proposed in
                         the Application will not violate the legal  rights
                         of the holders of any securities  issued by GPU or
                         any "associate company" thereof, as defined in the
                         Act.

                    We hereby consent to  the filing of this opinion  as an
          exhibit to  the  Application and  in any  proceedings before  the
          Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                                             Very truly yours,



                                             BERLACK, ISRAELS & LIBERMAN LLP
<PAGE>







                       (Letterhead of GPU Service Corporation)


                                                             Exhibit F-2(a)


                                             July 24, 1996



          Securities and Exchange Commission
          450 Fifth Street, N.W.
          Washington, D.C.  20549

                    Re:  GPU Generation Corporation
                         Jersey Central Power & Light Company
                         Metropolitan Edison Company
                         Pennsylvania Electric Company
                         Application on Form U-1 
                         SEC File No. 70-8289                    

          Dear Sirs:

                    I have  examined Post-Effective Amendment No.  1, dated
          April 17, 1996, to the Application on Form U-1, dated October 14,
          1993, under the Public  Utility Holding Company Act of  1935 (the
          "Act"),  filed by  GPU Generation  Corporation  ("GENCO"), Jersey
          Central Power  &  Light Company  ("JCP&L"),  Metropolitan  Edison
          Company ("Met-Ed") and  Pennsylvania Electric Company ("Penelec";
          together with  JCP&L and Met-Ed, the  "Operating Companies") with
          the  Securities and  Exchange Commission  (the "Commission")  and
          docketed by the Commission in SEC File No. 70-8289, as amended by
          Post-Effective Amendment No.  2 thereto, dated May 17,  1996, and
          as to be amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 thereto, dated
          this  date,  of  which this  opinion  is  to  be  a part.    (The
          Application,  as so  amended  and  as  thus  to  be  amended,  is
          hereinafter referred to as the "Application".)

                    The  Application now contemplates,  among other things,
          the  entering   into  by  GENCO  of   operation  and  maintenance
          agreements with non-utility generating  facilities with which  an
          Operating Company has entered into a power purchase agreement.

                    In connection  with the post-effective  Amendment No. 1
          and No. 2, I have examined copies, signed, certified or otherwise
          proven to our satisfaction, of the articles of incorporation  and
          by-laws  of GENCO  and a  copy of  the Commission's  Order, dated
          December 15, 1993, granting the Application, as then amended.  In
          addition, I have examined  such other instruments, agreements and
          documents  and made  such  other investigation  as I  have deemed
          necessary as a basis for this opinion.<PAGE>





          Securities and Exchange Commission
          July 24, 1996
          Page 2


                    I  am  the Director  of  Legal  Services and  Assistant
          General Counsel  for GPU  Service Corporation  and I am  familiar
          with the terms of the  outstanding securities of the corporations
          comprising the GPU holding company system.

                    I  am  a  member of  the  Bar  of  the Commonwealth  of
          Pennsylvania and do not  express any opinion with respect  to the
          laws  of any jurisdiction other than the laws of the Commonwealth
          of Pennsylvania and the Federal laws of the United States.

                    Based  upon  the  foregoing,  and  assuming  that   the
          transactions therein proposed are  carried out in accordance with
          the Application, I  am of  the opinion that  when the  Commission
          shall have entered an order forthwith granting the Application, 

                    (a)  all   State  laws   applicable  to   the  proposed
                         transactions will have been complied with; and

                    (b)  the  consummation of the  transactions proposed in
                         the  Application will not violate the legal rights
                         of the holders of any  securities issued by GPU or
                         any "associate company" thereof, as defined in the
                         Act.

                    I  hereby consent to the  filing of this  opinion as an
          exhibit  to  the Application  and in  any proceedings  before the
          Commission that may be held in connection therewith.

                                             Very truly yours,



                                             Michael J. Connolly
                                             Director of Legal Services and
                                             Assistant General Counsel<PAGE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission