DIANA CORP
8-K/A, 1997-11-05
GROCERIES & RELATED PRODUCTS
Previous: LACLEDE STEEL CO /DE/, 10-Q, 1997-11-05
Next: MAXXAM INC, 10-Q, 1997-11-05



                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                    Washington, D.C.  20549


                           FORM 8-K/A
                        (Amendment No. 2)

                         CURRENT REPORT

             Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Earliest Event Reported):  October 15, 1997

Exact name of Registrant
 as specified in its charter:  The Diana Corporation

State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation:  Delaware

Commission File Number:  1-5486

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number:  36-2448698

Address of Principal Executive Office:  26025 Mureau Road         
                                        Calabasas, CA 91302

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:  (818) 878-7711

ITEM 4.  CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

(a)    Previous independent accountants

(i)    On October 15, 1997, after completion of the March 31, 1997
       fiscal year audit, Price Waterhouse LLP, the Registrant's
       former independent accountants, in a letter addressed to the
       Registrant's Chairman and CEO with a copy to the Chief
       Accountant at the SEC, confirmed that the client - auditor
       relationship between The Diana Corporation and Price
       Waterhouse LLP had ceased upon the resignation of Price
       Waterhouse LLP.  During the third quarter of fiscal 1997,
       ending on January 4, 1997, the Registrant announced a
       restructuring plan to concentrate its resources on one line
       of business (communications switching) via its holdings in
       Sattel Communications LLC, and to discontinue, from an
       accounting standpoint, and to divest its other holdings. 
       Its largest subsidiary, Atlanta Provision Company, Inc., was
       sold in February 1997.  The Registrant subsequently moved
       its headquarters to Calabasas, California from Milwaukee,
       Wisconsin.  The remaining two discontinued operations are to
       be sold before March 31, 1998.  The change in both scope and
       size of annual revenues (from over $200,000,000 to
       approximately $10,000,000) going forward as well as the
       change in management and locations (now the former Sattel
       management in California) led to the cessation of the client
       - auditor relationship between Price Waterhouse LLP and the
       Registrant.

                                   1

<PAGE>

(ii)   The reports of Price Waterhouse LLP on the financial
       statements for the past two fiscal years contained no
       adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not
       qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
       accounting principle, except as to the uncertainties noted
       in the Report of Independent Accountants filed with the
       Registrant's Form 10-K dated September 22, 1997.  The
       uncertainties noted were as follows:

       The Registrant initiated a restructuring plan during fiscal
       1997 which resulted in Sattel Communications ("Sattel")
       becoming the sole operating company comprising the
       Registrant's continuing operations.  Sattel has a limited
       operating history and has not yet achieved significant sales
       of its products.  The Registrant's other operating companies
       were sold or are held for sale as of March 31, 1997. 
       Management believes the Registrant will have sufficient cash
       resources, including proceeds from those net assets held for
       sale, to fund its operations for the fiscal year ending
       March 31, 1998.  However, any material delay during fiscal
       1998 in the timing of disposal and the ultimate receipt of
       cash proceeds by the Registrant with respect to the net
       assets held for sale could have a material adverse effect on
       the Registrant.  In addition, the Registrant's viability is
       further dependent on Sattel achieving sales levels and
       operating results sufficient to fund the Company's
       operations.  Finally, the Registrant is subject to
       uncertainties relating to class action litigation asserted
       against the Registrant and other potential claims by
       investors, the ultimate effects of which on the Registrant's
       financial position, results of operations and cash flows
       cannot presently be determined.

(iii)  The Registrant's Audit Committee members and the
       Registrant's Chief Accounting Officer, have begun the
       process of searching for a new independent accounting firm. 
       The Company's audit committee was not involved by Price
       Waterhouse LLP regarding its decision to end the client -
       auditor relationship with the Registrant.

(iv)   Except as mentioned below, in connection with its audits for
       the two most recent fiscal years and through October 15,
       1997, there have been no disagreements with Price Waterhouse
       LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
       financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
       procedure which disagreements if not resolved to the
       satisfaction of Price Waterhouse LLP would have caused them
       to make reference thereto in their report on the financial
       statements for such years.

       During the audit of the fiscal 1997 financial statements a
       difference of opinion arose relating to the audit procedures
       necessary with respect to certain customer sales, including
       CNC.  The difference of opinion was with respect to the
       timing and manner of further Price Waterhouse LLP direct
       contact in addition to written receivable confirmation
       requests with the Registrant's customers and the Registrant
       management's concern regarding both pending legal

                                   2
<PAGE>

       proceedings with customers and/or potential adverse effect
       on the Registrant's customer relationships.  After further
       discussion, the manner of the customer contact was mutually
       agreed upon and the initial disagreement thus was promptly
       (within 1 day) resolved.  No disagreements in accounting
       related to these sales arose.  The Audit Committee discussed
       the subject matter of this disagreement with Price
       Waterhouse LLP.  The Company has authorized Price Waterhouse
       LLP to respond fully to the inquiries of its successor
       auditors concerning the subject matter of this disagreement.

(v)    During the two most recent fiscal years and through October
       15, 1997, the Registrant's management believes that there
       have been no reportable events (as defined in Regulation S-K
       Item 304(a)(1)(v)) except as follows:

       (1)   During the year-end audit of the accounts for fiscal
             1997, the following weaknesses in internal control
             were identified:

             (1.1)  Errors, including instances of failure to
                    properly consider, with respect to the
                    Registrant's policy, the effect of non-
                    standard contract provisions on revenue
                    recognition.
             (1.2)  Need for a more structured approach by which
                    to thoroughly complete and document a review
                    of relevant terms and conditions for all
                    contracts consistent with the Registrant's
                    revenue recognition policy/procedure and
                    required revenue recognition criteria. 

             Upon further review by the Company it was determined
             that certain sales transactions at the Registrant's
             Sattel Communications ("Sattel") operation were not
             consistent with the Sattel policy and procedure and
             the criteria required to support revenue recognition
             in accordance with generally accepted accounting
             principles.  These errors resulted in revisions to
             previously reported unaudited financial information
             with respect to the second and third quarters of
             fiscal 1997.  These revisions, which were included and
             reported in Note 16 Quarterly Results of Operations
             (Unaudited) of Form 10-K filed in respect of the
             fiscal year 1997, were as follows:

                                   3
<PAGE>

                          FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
                      (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

                                      12 Weeks Ended    
                         ----------------------------------------
                           October 12, 1996     January 4, 1997
                         -------------------  -------------------
                         Originally           Originally   
                          Reported   Revised   Reported   Revised
                         ----------  -------  ----------  -------

          Net Sales       $ 4,046   $ 3,666    $ 4,337   $ 2,552
          Gross Profit
           (Loss)           3,034     2,775      3,057     1,842

          Net Loss        $(4,598)  $(4,737)   $(4,001)  $(5,936)

          Net Loss Per
           Common Share   $  (.87)  $  (.90)   $  (.76)  $ (1.12)


       (2)   In addition to the matter reported in (v)(1) above, it
             was also noted that internal control weaknesses
             existed, which did not result in revisions to
             previously reported financial information, relative to
             insufficient identification and control surrounding
             Sattel's maintenance of detailed historical cost and
             accumulated depreciation information by individual
             asset, and that the timeliness and quality of account
             reconciliations and supporting analysis requires
             improvement in order to ensure that procedures are in
             place to support expected increases in transaction
             volumes anticipated by the Registrant.

       The following actions are being taken by the Registrant's
       management to correct the identified weaknesses:

       -  Strengthening of the Registrant's financial organization
          to increase the number of personnel qualified to address
          revenue recognition issues and to improve the timeliness
          and quality of account reconciliations and analysis.

       -  Implementation of a more timely and diligent review and
          resolution by management of all non-standard contract
          terms and conditions.

       -  Development and implementation of a comprehensive system
          to identify and properly address relevant revenue
          recognition considerations.

       -  Implementation of an enhanced fixed assets accounting and
          control system.

(b)    New independent accountants

(i)    The Registrant will file a separate current report on Form
       8-K once it has engaged its new independent accountants.

                                   4
<PAGE>

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(c)    Exhibits

       16.1  Letter dated November 5, 1997 from Price Waterhouse
             LLP


                           SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

           
                                   THE DIANA CORPORATION
                                   (Registrant)


Date:  November 5, 1997            /s/ Brian A. Robson
                                   Vice President and Controller


                                   5

                      Price Waterhouse LLP
                   100 East Wisconsin Avenue
                           Suite 1500
                      Milwaukee, WI  53202



November 5, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                      The Diana Corporation

We have read Item 4 of The Diana Corporation's Form 8-K/A
(Amendment No. 2) dated October 15, 1997 and are in agreement with
the statements contained in paragraph 4(a) therein, with the
following exceptions:

(a)(i)    We make no comment regarding the sentences following the
          first sentence of paragraph 4(a)(i).

(a)(v)    We make no comment regarding the actions which management
          has indicated are being taken to correct the identified
          weaknesses.

Further, we wish to note that the identified weaknesses reported in
paragraph 4(a)(v) were communicated in writing by us to the Audit
Committee.

Yours very truly,

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission