<PAGE> 1
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A No. 2
JOINT ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 1-5759 51-0255124
(State or other jurisdiction of Commission File Number (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation Identification No.)
or organization)
BGLS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 33-93576 13-3593483
(State or other jurisdiction of Commission File Number (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
100 S.E. Second Street
Miami, Florida 33131
305/579-8000
(Address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code,
of the principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on
which registered
Brooke Group Ltd.
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share New York
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrants were required to file such reports),
and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[ X ] Yes [ ] No
Explanatory Note: BGLS Inc. is required to file all reports required by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act in connection with its 15.75% Series B
Senior Secured Notes due 2001. BGLS Inc. meets the conditions set forth in
General Instruction I(l)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this
form with the reduced disclosure format.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statement
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ X ] Yes [ ] No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of
Brooke Group Ltd. as of March 21, 1997 was approximately $33,640,000. Directors
and officers and ten percent or greater stockholders of Brooke Group Ltd. are
considered affiliates for purposes of this calculation but should not
necessarily be deemed affiliates for any other purpose.
At March 21, 1997, Brooke Group Ltd. had 18,097,096 shares of common
stock outstanding, and BGLS Inc. had 100 shares of common stock outstanding,
all of which are held by Brooke Group Ltd.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Part III (items 10, 11, 12 and 13) from the definitive Proxy Statement of
Brooke Group Ltd. for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of
the Registrant's fiscal year covered by this report.
================================================================================
<PAGE> 2
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
The annual report on Form 10-K for 1996 is amended by replacing the
financial statements and financial statement schedules included therein with the
following:
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
Financial Statements and Schedule of the Registrant and its
subsidiaries, required to be included in Items 14(a) (1) and (2),
and 14(d) are listed below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: ----
<S> <C>
Brooke Group Ltd./BGLS Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements
-------------------------------------------------------------
Reports of Independent Accountants................................................. F-3
Brooke Group Ltd. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 F-5
BGLS Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1995............. F-6
Brooke Group Ltd. Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994............................................... F-7
BGLS Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994........................................................ F-8
Brooke Group Ltd. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994................................... F-9
BGLS Inc. Consolidated Statements of Stockholder's Equity (Deficit) for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994......................................... F-10
Brooke Group Ltd. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994............................................... F-11
BGLS Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994........................................................ F-13
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements......................................... F-15
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE> 3
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE:
Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts................................... F-50
Financial Statement Schedules not listed above have been omitted
because they are not applicable or the required information is
contained in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements or
accompanying Notes.
New Valley Corporation
----------------------
Reports of Independent Accountants................................................. F-51
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994................. F-53
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994.................................................................. F-54
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994............................................... F-55
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994.................................................................. F-56
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements......................................... F-57
MAI Systems Corporation
-----------------------
Report of Independent Accountants.................................................. F-79
</TABLE>
F-2
<PAGE> 4
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Brooke Group Ltd. and BGLS Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brooke Group
Ltd. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") and BGLS Inc. and Subsidiaries ("BGLS") as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's and BGLS' management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did
not audit the financial statements of MAI Systems Corporation ("MAI"), a
discontinued subsidiary (Note 5), which statements reflect net income comprising
4% of the Company's and BGLS' consolidated net income for the year ended
December 31, 1994. Further, we did not audit the financial statements of New
Valley Corporation ("New Valley") for the year ended December 31, 1994, the
investment in which is being accounted for by the Company and BGLS using
the equity method of accounting (Note 2). The equity in the net income of New
Valley represents 85% and 88% of the Company's and BGLS' consolidated net
income for the year ended December 31, 1994, respectively. Those statements
were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us and our
opinion on the consolidated financial statements, insofar as it relates to the
amounts included for MAI and New Valley, are based solely upon the reports of
the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of Brooke Group Ltd. and
Subsidiaries and BGLS Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995 and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 20, the Company has engaged in negotiations with the
principal holders of BGLS Inc.'s 15.75% Senior Secured Notes ("the BGLS Notes")
to restructure certain of its debt service requirements. The Company has also
entered into a standstill and consent agreement with the principal holders of
the BGLS Notes whereby each of the principal holders waived the right to receive
on August 29, 1997 its pro rata share of the interest payment originally due on
July 31, 1997, in the total amount of $15,340,000. The standstill and consent
agreement expires on February 6, 1998. In addition, the Company has completed a
third party equity financing. While all liquidity requirements have not been
met, management currently believes that new debt and equity financing and a
successful restructuring of certain of its debt service requirements along with
cash provided from operations and distributions from New Valley, will provide
the Company with sufficient liquidity for 1998.
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Miami, Florida
March 27, 1997, except for Note 20, for which the date is January 30, 1998.
F-3
<PAGE> 5
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Brooke Group Ltd. and BGLS Inc.
Our report on the consolidated financial statements of Brooke Group Ltd. and
Subsidiaries and BGLS Inc. and Subsidiaries is included on Page F-3 of this
Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of such financial statements, we have
also audited the related financial statement schedule on page F-50 of this Form
10-K.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be
included therein.
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Miami, Florida
March 27, 1997
F-4
<PAGE> 6
BROOKE GROUP LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1996 1995
---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents............................................. $ 1,941 $ 3,370
Accounts receivable - trade........................................... 19,475 23,844
Other receivables..................................................... 1,217 1,448
Receivables from affiliates........................................... 47 1,502
Inventories........................................................... 53,691 60,522
Deferred tax assets................................................... 1,061
Other current assets.................................................. 4,181 4,868
--------- -------
Total current assets................................................ 80,552 96,615
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $31,047 and $27,323................................... 80,282 48,352
Intangible assets, at cost, less accumulated amortization
of $17,457 and $15,679................................................ 4,421 5,453
Investment in affiliate................................................. 3,051 63,901
Other assets............................................................ 9,371 11,299
--------- --------
Total assets........................................................ $177,677 $225,620
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt................... $ 55,242 $ 2,387
Accounts payable...................................................... 32,461 22,762
Due to affiliates..................................................... 990
Dividends payable..................................................... 1,387
Cash overdraft........................................................ 6 4,266
Accrued promotional expenses.......................................... 30,257 25,519
Accrued taxes payable................................................. 26,379 22,846
Accrued interest...................................................... 24,354 16,863
Other accrued liabilities............................................. 33,387 24,534
-------- --------
Total current liabilities........................................... 204,463 119,177
Notes payable, long-term debt and other obligations,
less current portion.................................................. 378,243 406,744
Noncurrent employee benefits............................................ 31,256 31,672
Other liabilities....................................................... 18,704 24,131
Commitments and contingencies...........................................
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, authorized 10,000,000
shares ............................................................
Series G Preferred Stock, 2,184.834 shares, convertible, participating,
cumulative, each share convertible to 1,000 shares of common
stock and cash or stock distribution, liquidation preference
of $1.00 per share .................................................
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share, authorized 40,000,000
shares, issued 24,998,043 shares, outstanding 18,497,096 shares..... 1,850 1,850
Additional paid-in capital............................................ 94,169 93,186
Deficit............................................................... (490,706) (428,173)
Other................................................................. (27,963) 9,372
Less: 6,500,947 shares of common stock in treasury, at cost.......... (32,339) (32,339)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit).............................. (454,989) (356,104)
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit).............. $177,677 $225,620
======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-5
<PAGE> 7
BGLS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1996 1995
----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................................. $ 1,940 $ 3,370
Accounts receivable - trade............................................... 19,475 23,844
Other receivables......................................................... 1,166 1,481
Receivables from affiliates............................................... 47 1,130
Inventories............................................................... 53,691 60,522
Deferred tax assets....................................................... 4,861
Other current assets...................................................... 3,878 4,435
--------- --------
Total current assets.................................................. 80,197 99,643
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation of $30,762 and $27,181....................................... 79,972 47,900
Intangible assets, at cost, less accumulated amortization
of $17,457 and $15,679.................................................... 4,421 5,453
Investment in affiliate..................................................... 3,051 63,901
Other assets................................................................ 10,467 12,345
-------- --------
Total assets.......................................................... $178,108 $229,242
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT):
Current liabilities:
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt....................... $ 53,945 $ 2,132
Accounts payable.......................................................... 32,336 22,637
Cash overdraft............................................................ 6 3,761
Due to parent............................................................. 29,598 26,054
Accrued promotional expenses.............................................. 30,257 25,519
Accrued taxes payable..................................................... 26,379 22,846
Accrued interest.......................................................... 24,354 16,863
Other accrued liabilities................................................. 32,861 23,073
-------- --------
Total current liabilities............................................. 229,736 142,885
Notes payable, long-term debt and other obligations, less current portion... 378,243 420,449
Noncurrent employee benefits................................................ 31,256 31,672
Other liabilities........................................................... 21,958 24,131
Commitments and contingencies...............................................
Stockholder's equity (deficit):
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 100 shares,
issued 100 shares, outstanding 100 shares...............................
Additional paid-in capital................................................ 39,081 23,594
Deficit................................................................... (499,264) (423,424)
Other..................................................................... (22,902) 9,935
-------- ---------
Total stockholder's equity (deficit).................................. (483,085) (389,895)
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity (deficit).................. $178,108 $229,242
======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-6
<PAGE> 8
BROOKE GROUP LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues*.................................................. $452,656 $461,459 $479,343
Cost of goods sold*........................................ 235,633 216,187 229,807
------- ------- -------
Gross profit...................................... 217,023 245,272 249,536
Operating, selling, administrative and general expenses.... 220,950 237,212 235,374
------- ------- -------
Operating (loss) income........................... (3,927) 8,060 14,162
Other income (expenses):
Interest income........................................ 220 989 533
Interest expense....................................... (60,556) (57,505) (55,952)
Equity in (loss) earnings of affiliate................. (7,211) 678
Sale of assets......................................... 6,716
Other, net............................................. 1,242 2,776 (1,221)
--------- -------- -------
(Loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes........................................... (63,516) (45,002) (42,478)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes....................... 1,402 342 (24,487)
--------- -------- ------
(Loss) from continuing operations.......................... (64,918) (45,344) (17,991)
-------- ------- ------
Discontinued operations:
(Loss) income from discontinued operations............. (1,591) 2,860 23,693
Gain on disposal....................................... 3,976 18,369 150,990
--------- ------- -------
Income from discontinued operations........................ 2,385 21,229 174,683
--------- ------- -------
(Loss) income before extraordinary items................... (62,533) (24,115) 156,692
-------- ------- -------
Extraordinary items:
(Loss) resulting from the early extinguishment of debt. (9,810) (47,513)
Gain on reorganization of MAI.......................... 916
--------- ----------- ----------
(Loss) from extraordinary items................... (9,810) (46,597)
--------- ------- --------
Net (loss) income................................. (62,533) (33,925) 110,095
Proportionate share of New Valley capital transactions,
retirement of Class A Preferred Shares................. 1,782 16,802
--------- -------- --------
Net (loss) income applicable to common shares..... $ (60,751) $ (17,123) $110,095
========= ========= ========
Per common share:
(Loss) from continuing operations...................... $(3.41) $(1.56) $(1.02)
====== ====== ======
Income from discontinued operations.................... $ 0.13 $ 1.16 $ 9.92
====== ====== ======
Extraordinary items.................................... $ $(0.54) $(2.65)
====== ====== ======
Net (loss) income applicable to common shares...... $(3.28) $(0.94) $ 6.25
====== ====== ======
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents
outstanding............................................ 18,497,096 18,301,186 17,610,898
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- ----------------------
* Revenues and Cost of goods sold include federal excise taxes of $104,518,
$123,420 and $131,877 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-7
<PAGE> 9
BGLS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues*............................................................... $452,656 $461,459 $479,341
Cost of goods sold*..................................................... 235,633 216,187 229,803
------- ------- -------
Gross profit................................................... 217,023 245,272 249,538
Operating, selling, administrative and
general expenses.................................................... 219,039 236,961 235,792
------- ------- -------
Operating (loss) income........................................ (2,016) 8,311 13,746
Other income (expenses):
Interest income..................................................... 157 989 225
Interest expense.................................................... (64,417) (61,036) (58,625)
Equity in (loss) earnings of affiliate.............................. (7,211) 678
Sale of assets...................................................... 6,716
Other, net.......................................................... (2,579) 2,292 (2,136)
--------- --------- --------
(Loss) from continuing operations before income taxes................... (69,350) (48,766) (46,790)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes.................................... 5,254 1,736 (24,943)
--------- --------- ------
(Loss) from continuing operations....................................... (74,604) (50,502) (21,847)
-------- -------- ------
Discontinued operations:
(Loss) income from discontinued operations.......................... (1,591) 2,860 23,693
Gain on disposal.................................................... 3,976 18,369 150,990
------ -------- -------
Income from discontinued operations..................................... 2,385 21,229 174,683
------ -------- -------
(Loss) income before extraordinary items................................ (72,219) (29,273) 152,836
-------- -------- -------
Extraordinary items:
(Loss) resulting from the early extinguishment of debt.............. (9,810) (47,513)
Gain on reorganization of MAI....................................... 916
--------- --------- --------
(Loss) from extraordinary items................................ (9,810) (46,597)
--------- --------- --------
Net (loss) income............................................ $(72,219) $(39,083) $106,239
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- ---------------------
* Revenues and Cost of goods sold include federal excise taxes of $104,518,
$123,420 and $131,877 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-8
<PAGE> 10
BROOKE GROUP LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Stock Additional
Series G Common Stock Paid-In Treasury
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Stock Other Total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993 ........... 2,184,834 $ 2 15,259,762 $ 1,526 $ 60,578 $(540,942) $(35,846) $(514,682)
Foreign currency adjustment .......... $ 201 201
Preferred stock exchanged for common . (2,184,834) (2) 2,184,834 218 (216)
Reclassification of former Vice
Chairman's loan to other receivables 1,500 1,500
Contingent Value Rights settlement ... 1,875 1,875
Repayment by Chairman of interest .... 1,163 1,163
Waiver of dividends, shareholder
settlement .......................... 6,250 3,200 9,450
Transfer of pension liability to
SkyBox .............................. 4,305 4,305
Stock grant to consultant ............ 250,000 25 (739) 1,182 468
Contract settlement .................. (371) (371)
Exercise of warrant .................. 607,889 61 (2,875) 2,875 61
Net income ........................... 110,095 110,095
Unrealized holding gain on
investment in New Valley............. 11,164 11,164
Treasury stock, at cost............... (41,641) (4) 4 1,672 (1,753) (81)
---------- --- ---------- ------ ----- ------- ----- -------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1994 ........... 18,260,844 1,826 66,245 (420,746) (33,542) 11,365 (374,852)
Net loss ............................. (33,925) (33,925)
Consolidation of foreign subsidiary .. 14,435 14,435
Distributions on common stock
($0.30 per share).................... (5,474) (5,474)
Stock grant to directors ............. 20,000 2 (2) 94 94
Stock grant to consultant ............ 250,000 25 (800) 1,244 469
Stock options granted to consultant .. 938 (563) 375
MAI spin-off ......................... 27,286 (201) 27,085
Unrealized holding loss on investment
in New Valley ....................... (2,332) (2,332)
Effect of New Valley capital
transactions ........................ 17,043 1,103 18,146
Treasury stock, at cost .............. (33,748) (3) 3 (135) (135)
Other, net ........................... (2) 12 10
---------- --- ---------- ------ ------ --------- ------- ------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1995 ........... 18,497,096 1,850 93,186 $(428,173) (32,339) 9,372 (356,104)
Net loss ............................. (62,533) (62,533)
Distributions on common stock
($0.30 per share) ................... (5,549) (5,549)
Amortization of deferred compensation 252 252
Stock options granted to consultant .. 4,750 (4,750)
Unrealized holding loss on investment
in New Valley ....................... (33,936) (33,936)
Effect of New Valley capital
transactions ........................ 1,782 1,099 2,881
---------- --- ---------- ------ ------- --------- -------- -------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1996 ........... $ 18,497,096 $1,850 $94,169 $(490,706) $(32,339) $(27,963) $(454,989)
========== === ========== ====== ======= ========= ======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-9
<PAGE> 11
BGLS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Additional
------------ Paid-in
Shares Amount Capital Deficit Other Total
------ ------ ------- ------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993........................... 100 $(508,675) $(508,675)
Distributions paid to parent......................... (9,212) (9,212)
Reclassification of former Vice
Chairman's loan to other receivables............... 1,500 1,500
Transfer of pension liability to SkyBox.............. 4,305 4,305
Repayment of loan.................................... 3,200 3,200
Net income........................................... 106,239 106,239
Unrealized holding gain on investment in New Valley.. $11,164 11,164
Foreign currency adjustment.......................... 201 201
------ --------- --------- ---------- ------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1994........................... 100 (402,643) 11,365 (391,278)
Distributions paid to parent......................... (5,872) (5,872)
Distribution of MAI to parent........................ 24,942 (201) 24,741
Net loss............................................. (39,083) (39,083)
Unrealized loss on investment in New Valley.......... (2,332) (2,332)
Effect of New Valley capital transactions............ $17,043 1,103 18,146
Forgiveness of debt by parent........................ 4,565 4,565
Capital contribution................................. 1,986 1,986
Other, net........................................... (768) (768)
------ --------- ---------- ---------- -------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1995........................... 100 23,594 (423,424) 9,935 (389,895)
Distributions paid to parent......................... (3,621) (3,621)
Net loss............................................. (72,219) (72,219)
Unrealized holding loss on investment in New Valley.. (33,936) (33,936)
Effect of New Valley capital transactions............ 1,782 1,099 2,881
Forgiveness of debt by parent........................ 13,705 13,705
------ --------- ------ ---------- --------- --------
Balance, December 31, 1996........................... 100 $ $39,081 $(499,264) $(22,902) $(483,085)
====== ========= ======= ========= ======== =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-10
<PAGE> 12
BROOKE GROUP LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income......................................... $(62,533) $(33,925) $110,095
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization......................... 8,819 9,076 6,821
Noncash compensation expense.......................... 252 559 8,463
Deferred income taxes................................. 1,061 (24,487)
Gain on sale of assets................................ (6,716) (1,042) (11,925)
Extraordinary item.................................... 9,810
Impact of discontinued operations..................... (2,385) (21,229) (117,275)
Other, net............................................ 7,211 4,167 6,265
Changes in assets and liabilities, net:
Receivables........................................... 6,222 6,561 (4,002)
Inventories........................................... 6,830 (7,490) (9,574)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.............. 27,716 (5,445) (8,576)
Other assets and liabilities, net..................... 9,818 15,972 135
----- ------ --------
Net cash used in operating activities....................... (3,705) (22,986) (44,060)
------ ------ ------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of business and assets................. 8,040 14,152 29,542
Impact of discontinued operations......................... (4,555)
Investments............................................... (2,811) (1,965)
Capital expenditures...................................... (34,241) (8,805) (3,023)
Dividends from New Valley................................. 24,733 61,832
Other, net................................................ 1,660 1,897
------- ------- -------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities......... (4,279) 66,874 23,861
------- ------ ------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-11
<PAGE> 13
BROOKE GROUP LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from debt.............................................. 20,702 2,568 9,261
Repayments of debt.............................................. (8,864) (37,196) (2,027)
Borrowings under revolver....................................... 353,365 397,873 369,806
Repayments on revolver.......................................... (350,105) (401,703) (366,544)
(Decrease) increase in cash overdraft........................... (4,256) (594) (12,669)
Series G preferred dividend..................................... (75) (5,923)
Distributions on common stock................................... (4,162) (5,475)
CVR settlement.................................................. 1,875
Treasury stock purchases........................................ (135) (21)
Deferred financing costs........................................ (2,705)
Stockholder loan and interest repayments........................ 17,774
Impact of discontinued operations............................... (437)
Other, net...................................................... (57) 375
------ ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities............... 6,680 (44,794) 8,765
------ ------- -----
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents...... (125) (63)
------ ------- --------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents......................... (1,429) (906) (11,497)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period.................... 3,370 4,276 15,773
------- ------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period.......................... $ 1,941 $ 3,370 $ 4,276
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-12
<PAGE> 14
BGLS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income................................................... $(72,219) $(39,083) $106,239
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization................................... 8,677 8,946 6,807
Noncash compensation expense.................................... 8,268
Gain on sale of assets.......................................... (6,716)
Deferred income taxes........................................... 4,861 (26,334)
Extraordinary item.............................................. 9,810
Impact of discontinued operations............................... (2,385) (21,229) (128,998)
Other, net...................................................... 7,211 (558) 6,014
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables..................................................... 5,863 7,261 (5,768)
Inventories..................................................... 6,830 (7,489) (9,573)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities........................ 34,461 1,001 9,518
Other assets and liabilities, net............................... 9,712 16,970 (1,970)
----- ------ -----
Net cash used in operating activities................................... (3,705) (24,371) (35,797)
------ ------ ------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of business and assets........................... 8,040 13,852 29,317
Impact of discontinued operations................................... (4,408)
Investments......................................................... (2,811) (2,765)
Capital expenditures................................................ (34,241) (8,569) (2,652)
Dividends from New Valley........................................... 24,733 61,832
Other, net.......................................................... 1,660 1,897
------ ------ ------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities..................... (4,279) 66,010 24,154
------ ------ ------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-13
<PAGE> 15
BGLS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-----------------------------------------
<S> <S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from debt................................................... 19,060 2,568 8,261
Repayments of debt................................................... (8,265) (37,166) (1,790)
Borrowings under revolver............................................ 353,365 397,873 369,806
Repayments on revolver............................................... (350,105) (401,703) (366,544)
(Decrease) increase in cash overdraft................................ (3,755) (215) 1,331
Deferred financing costs............................................. (2,705)
Distributions paid to parent......................................... (3,621) (5,871) (6,012)
Repayment to parent.................................................. (16,357)
Repayment from parent................................................ 12,500
Stockholder loan and interest repayments............................. 1,911
Impact of discontinued operations.................................... (437)
Other, net........................................................... 1,986 375
------- ------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities.................... 6,679 (42,528) 339
------- ------ --------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents........... (125) (63)
-------- -------- --------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents.............................. (1,430) (889) (11,367)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period......................... 3,370 4,259 15,626
------- ------ --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period............................... $ 1,940 $ 3,370 $ 4,259
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements
F-14
<PAGE> 16
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of Presentation:
The consolidated financial statements of Brooke Group Ltd. (the
"Company") include the consolidated statements of its wholly-owned
subsidiary, BGLS Inc. ("BGLS"). The consolidated statements of BGLS
include the accounts of Liggett Group Inc. ("Liggett"), Brooke
(Overseas) Ltd. ("BOL"), New Valley Holdings, Inc. ("NV Holdings") and
other less significant subsidiaries. Based on the Company's ability to
assert sufficient control, the Company consolidated the accounts of
Liggett-Ducat Ltd. ("Liggett-Ducat") at December 31, 1995. (Refer to
Note 4.) Liggett is engaged primarily in the manufacture and sale of
cigarettes, principally in the United States. Liggett-Ducat is engaged
in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes in Russia. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
(b) Liquidity:
The Company believes it will have sufficient liquidity for 1997. This
is based on, among other things, forecasts of cash flow for the
principal operating companies which indicate that they will be
self-sufficient, the sale of BrookeMil Ltd. ("BML"), a subsidiary of
BOL, to an affiliate, New Valley Corporation ("New Valley"), on
January 31, 1997, and certain funds available from New Valley subject
to limitations imposed by BGLS' indenture agreements. Liggett had net
capital and working capital deficiencies of $176,478 and $40,694,
respectively, at December 31, 1996, is highly leveraged and has
substantial near-term debt service requirements. These matters raise
substantial doubt about Liggett meeting its liquidity needs and its
ability to continue as a going concern. (Refer to Notes 2, 4 and 9.)
(c) Estimates and Assumptions:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Significant estimates
subject to material changes in the near term include deferred tax
assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, sales return and allowances,
actuarial assumptions of pension plans and litigation and defense
costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents:
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, cash includes cash on
hand, cash on deposit in banks and cash equivalents, comprised of
short-term investments which have an original maturity of 90 days or
less. Interest on short-term investments is recognized when earned.
(e) Financial Instruments:
The estimated fair value of the Company's long-term debt is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31, 1996 1995
--------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
-------- ----- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Long-term debt $433,485 $294,451 $409,131 $343,517
</TABLE>
F-15
<PAGE> 17
SHORT-TERM DEBT - The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets approximate fair value because of the variable interest
rates and the short maturity of these instruments.
LONG-TERM DEBT - Fair value is estimated based on current market
quotations, where available or based on an evaluation of the debt in
relation to market prices of the Company's publicly traded debt.
The methods and assumptions used by the Company's management in
estimating fair values for financial instruments as required by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 107,
"Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments," presented
herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could
realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market
assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect
on the estimated fair values.
(f) Significant Concentrations of Credit Risk:
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents and trade receivables. The Company places its temporary
cash in money market securities (investment grade or better) with what
management believes are high credit quality financial institutions.
Liggett's customers are primarily candy and tobacco distributors, the
military and large grocery, drug and convenience store chains. One
customer accounted for approximately 13.7% of net sales for the year
ended December 31, 1996 and 11.6% of net sales for the year ended
December 31, 1995, the majority of which were in the private label
discount segment. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of
the Company's net sales in 1994. Concentrations of credit risk with
respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number of
customers, located primarily throughout the United States, comprising
Liggett's customer base. Ongoing credit evaluations of customers'
financial condition are performed and, generally, no collateral is
required. Liggett maintains reserves for potential credit losses and
such losses, in the aggregate, have generally not exceeded
management's expectations.
(g) Accounts Receivable:
The allowance for doubtful accounts and cash discounts was $1,280 and
$1,536 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
(h) Inventories:
Liggett tobacco inventories, which comprise 93.4% and 83.3% of total
inventory in 1996 and 1995, respectively, are stated at the lower of
cost or market and are determined primarily by the last-in, first-out
(LIFO) method. Although portions of leaf tobacco inventories may not
be used or sold within one year because of the time required for
aging, they are included in current assets, which is common practice
in the industry. It is not practicable to determine the amount that
will not be used or sold within one year.
Remaining inventories are determined primarily on a first-in,
first-out (FIFO) basis.
F-16
<PAGE> 18
(i) Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which
are 20 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years for machinery and
equipment.
Interest costs are capitalized in connection with the construction of
major facilities. Capitalized interest is recorded as part of the
asset to which it relates and is amortized over the asset's estimated
useful life. In 1996 and 1995, interest costs of $6,387 and $1,004,
respectively, were capitalized. No interest was capitalized in 1994.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as
incurred. The costs of major renewals and betterments are capitalized.
The cost and related accumulated depreciation of property, plant and
equipment are removed from the accounts upon retirement or other
disposition and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.
(j) Intangible Assets:
Intangible assets, consisting principally of trademarks and goodwill,
are amortized using the straight-line method over 10-12 years.
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994 was $1,778, $1,725 and $1,722, respectively. Management
periodically reviews the carrying value of such assets to determine
whether asset values are impaired.
(k) Other Assets:
Other assets consist primarily of debt issuance costs. Such costs are
being amortized over the life of the debt.
(l) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of". The
Statement establishes accounting standards for the impairment of
long-lived assets, certain identifiable intangibles, and goodwill
related to those assets. There was no material effect on the financial
position or results of operations from the adoption because the
Company's prior impairment recognition practice was consistent with
the major provisions of the Statement. Under provisions of the
Statement, impairment losses are recognized when expected future cash
flows are less than the assets' carrying value. Accordingly, when
indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the
carrying value of property, plant and equipment and intangibles in
relation to the operating performance and estimates of future
discounted cash flows of the underlying business.
(m) Employee Benefits:
Liggett sponsors self-insured health and dental insurance plans for
all eligible employees. As a result, the expense recorded for such
benefits involves an estimate of unpaid claims as of December 31, 1996
and 1995 which are subject to significant fluctuations in the near
term.
F-17
<PAGE> 19
(n) Postretirement Benefits other than Pensions:
Under SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other Than Pensions", the cost of providing retiree health care and
life insurance benefits is actuarially determined and accrued over the
service period of the active employee group.
(o) Postemployment Benefits:
SFAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits",
establishes standards of financial accounting and reporting for the
estimated cost of benefits provided by an employer to former or
inactive employees after employment but before retirement. No expense
was associated with the adoption since the Company's previous policies
accounted for all items required by SFAS No. 112.
(p) Stock Options:
Effective January 1, 1996, SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", was adopted by the Company as required for its fiscal
1996 financial statements. The Company has elected to continue to
measure compensation expense for stock-based employee compensation
plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and will provide pro
forma disclosures of net income as if the fair value-based method
prescribed by SFAS No. 123 had been applied in measuring compensation
expense.
(q) Income Taxes:
Under SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", deferred taxes
reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of
assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and
the amounts recognized for tax purposes as well as tax credit
carryforwards and loss carryforwards. These deferred taxes are
measured by applying currently enacted tax rates. A valuation
allowance reduces deferred tax assets when it is deemed more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized.
(r) Revenue Recognition:
Revenues from sales are recognized upon the shipment of finished goods
to customers. The Company provides an allowance for expected sales
returns, net of related inventory cost recoveries. Since the Company's
primary line of business is tobacco, the Company's financial position
and its results of operations and cash flows could be materially
adversely affected by significant unit sales volume declines,
litigation and defense costs, increased tobacco costs or reductions in
the selling price of cigarettes in the near term.
(s) Earnings Per Share:
Per share calculations are based on the weighted average shares of
common stock outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents. For
the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, per share calculations
include the Company's proportionate share of excess carrying value of
New Valley redeemable preferred shares over the cost of shares
repurchased of $1,782 and $16,802, respectively.
F-18
<PAGE> 20
New Accounting Pronouncement. In February 1997, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share".
SFAS No. 128 specifies new standards designed to improve the earnings
per share ("EPS") information provided in financial statements by
simplifying the existing computational guidelines, revising the
disclosure requirements and increasing the comparability of EPS data
on an international basis. Some of the changes made to simplify the
EPS computations include: (a) eliminating the presentation of primary
EPS and replacing it with basic EPS, with the principal difference
being that common stock equivalents are not considered in computing
basic EPS, (b) eliminating the modified treasury stock method and the
three percent materiality provision and (c) revising the contingent
share provisions and the supplemental EPS data requirements. SFAS No.
128 also makes a number of changes to existing disclosure
requirements. SFAS No. 128 is effective for financial statements
issued for periods ending after December 15, 1997, including interim
periods. The Company has not yet determined the impact of the
implementation of SFAS No. 128.
(t) Foreign Currency Translation:
The Company accounts for translation of foreign currency in accordance
with SFAS No. 52, "Foreign Currency Translation." The Company's
Russian subsidiary operates in a "highly inflationary" economy and
uses the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. Therefore, certain
assets of this entity (principally inventories and property and
equipment) are translated at historical exchange rates with all other
assets and liabilities translated at year end exchange rates and all
translation adjustments are reflected in the consolidated statements
of operations.
(u) Reclassifications:
Certain amounts in prior years' financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
2. INVESTMENT IN NEW VALLEY CORPORATION
The Company's and BGLS' investment in New Valley at December 31, 1996
and 1995, respectively, is summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Fair Carrying Unrealized
Shares Value Amount Holding Gain (Loss)
--------- ----- -------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
----
Class A Preferred Shares....... 618,326 $ 72,962 $ 72,962 $(24,881)
Class B Preferred Shares....... 250,885 1,631 1,631 (223)
Common Shares.................. 3,989,710(A) 5,985 (71,542)
-------- -------- --------
$ 80,578 $ 3,051 $(25,104)
======== ======== ========
1995
----
Class A Preferred Shares....... 618,326 $109,386 $109,386 $ 7,424
Class B Preferred Shares....... 250,885 3,262 3,262 1,408
Common Shares.................. 79,794,229 21,544 (48,747)
-------- -------- --------
$134,192 $ 63,901 $ 8,832
======== ======== ========
---------
(A) Gives effect to July 1996 one-for-twenty stock split.
</TABLE>
The $15.00 Class A Increasing Rate Cumulative Senior Preferred Shares
($100 Liquidation Value), $.01 par value (the "Class A Preferred
Shares") and the $3.00 Class B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares
($25 Liquidation Value), $.10 par value (the "Class B Preferred
Shares") are accounted for as debt and equity securities,
respectively, pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 115,
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,"
and are classified as available-for-sale. Prior to January 1, 1996,
the Class A Preferred Shares' fair value had been estimated with
reference to the securities' preference features, including dividend
and liquidation
F-19
<PAGE> 21
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
preferences, and the composition and nature of the underlying net
assets of New Valley. During 1996, however, New Valley became engaged
in the ownership and management of commercial real estate and acquired
a controlling interest in Thinking Machines Corporation ("Thinking
Machines"). Because these businesses affected the composition and
nature of the underlying net assets of New Valley, the Company
determined the fair value of the Class A and Class B Preferred Shares
based on the quoted market price commencing with the quarter ended
March 31, 1996. Through September 1996 earnings on the Class A
Preferred Shares were comprised of dividends accrued during the period
and the accretion of the difference between the Company's basis and
their mandatory redemption price. New Valley's Common Shares, $.01 par
value (the "Common Shares") were accounted for pursuant to APB No. 18,
"The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock."
During the quarter ended September 30, 1996, the decline in the market
value of the Class A Preferred Shares, the dividend received on the
Class A Preferred Shares and the Company's equity in losses incurred
by New Valley caused the carrying value of the Company's investment in
New Valley to be reduced to zero. Beginning in the fourth quarter of
1996, the Company suspended the recording of its earnings on the
dividends accrued and the accretion of the difference between the
Company's basis in the Class A Preferred Shares and their mandatory
redemption price.
In November 1994, New Valley's First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization, as amended ("Joint Plan"), was confirmed by order of
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey and
on January 18, 1995, New Valley emerged from bankruptcy reorganization
proceedings and completed substantially all distributions to creditors
under the Joint Plan. Pursuant to the Joint Plan, among other things,
the Class A Preferred Shares, the Class B Preferred Shares and the
Common Shares, and other equity interests, were reinstated and
retained all of their legal, equitable and contractual rights.
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company's investment in New Valley
consisted of an approximate 42% voting interest. The Company's
investment in 1996 and 1995 was represented by 618,326 Class A
Preferred Shares, 3,989,710 Common Shares (41.7%) (giving effect to a
one-for-twenty reverse stock split by New Valley in July 1996) and
250,885 Class B Preferred Shares (9.0%). At December 31, 1996, the
Company owns 57.7% of the outstanding Class A Preferred Shares.
In February 1995, New Valley repurchased 54,445 Class A Preferred
Shares pursuant to a tender offer made as part of the Joint Plan.
During 1995, New Valley repurchased 339,400 additional Class A
Preferred Shares on the open market at an aggregate cost of $43,405.
During 1996, New Valley repurchased 72,104 Class A Preferred Shares
for a total amount of $10,530. The Company has recorded its
proportionate interest in the excess of the carrying value of the
shares over the cost of the shares repurchased as a credit to
additional paid-in capital in the amount of $1,782 and $16,802, along
with other New Valley capital transactions of $0 and $241, for the
years ended December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, respectively.
The Class A Preferred Shares of New Valley are required to be redeemed
on January 1, 2003 for $100.00 per share plus dividends accrued to the
redemption date. The shares are redeemable, at any time, at the option
of New Valley, at $100.00 per share plus accrued dividends. The
holders of Class A Preferred Shares are entitled to receive a
quarterly dividend, as declared by the Board of Directors, payable at
the rate of $19.00 per annum. At December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, the accrued and unpaid dividends arrearage was $117,117
($109.31 per share) and $121,893 ($110.06 per share). The Company
received $24,733 ($40.00 per share) and $61,832 ($100.00 per share) in
dividend distributions in 1996 and 1995, respectively.
F-20
<PAGE> 22
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Holders of the Class B Preferred Shares are entitled to receive a quarterly
dividend, as declared by the Board, at a rate of $3.00 per annum. At
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, the accrued and unpaid dividends
arrearage was $115,944 ($41.55 per share) and $95,118 ($34.08 per share).
No dividends on the Class B Preferred Shares have been declared since the
fourth quarter of 1988.
Summarized financial information for New Valley follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current assets, primarily cash and marketable
securities........................................... $183,720 $333,485
Noncurrent assets....................................... 222,820 52,337
Current liabilities..................................... 98,110 177,920
Noncurrent liabilities.................................. 170,223 11,967
Redeemable preferred stock.............................. 210,571 226,396
Shareholders' equity (deficit).......................... (72,364) (30,461)
Revenues ............................................. 111,954 67,730 $ 10,381
Costs and expenses...................................... 128,209 66,064 26,146
(Loss) income from continuing operations................ (13,216) 1,374 (15,265)
Income from discontinued operations..................... 5,726 16,873 1,135,706(A)
Extraordinary items..................................... (110,500)
Net (loss) income applicable to Common Shares(C)........ (65,160) (13,714) 929,904
Company's share of discontinued operations.............. 2,385 7,031 139,935(B)
Company's share of extraordinary item................... (46,487)(B)
------------------
(A) Includes gain on sale of New Valley's money transfer business of $1,056,081, net of income taxes of $52,000.
(B) The Company's share of the extraordinary item ($46,487) was related to extinguishment of debt in 1994.
The Company's share of income from discontinued operations in 1994 was determined after accounting for losses
not recognized in prior years as follows:
42.1% of income from discontinued operations................. $ 477,791
Losses not recognized in prior periods....................... (337,856)
Company's share of equity in discontinued ---------
operations of New Valley.................................... $ 139,935
=========
(C) Considers all preferred accrued dividends, whether or not declared and, in 1995 and 1996, the excess of carrying
value of redeemable preferred shares over cost of shares purchased.
</TABLE>
On January 31, 1997, New Valley acquired substantially all the common
shares of BML from BOL for $55,000. (Refer to Note 4.)
3. RJR NABISCO HOLDINGS CORP.
On October 17, 1995, New Valley and its subsidiary, ALKI Corp. ("ALKI"),
entered into an agreement, as amended (the "New Valley Agreement"), with
High River Limited Partnership ("High River"), an entity owned by Carl C.
Icahn. Pursuant to the New Valley Agreement, New Valley sold approximately
1,600,000 shares of common stock of RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp. ("RJR
Nabisco") to
F-21
<PAGE> 23
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
High River for an aggregate purchase price of $51,000. The New
Valley Agreement also provided for the parties to pay certain other fees to
each other under certain circumstances, including a payment to High River
equal to 20% of New Valley's profit on its RJR Nabisco common stock, after
certain expenses as defined in the New Valley Agreement.
On October 17, 1995, the Company and BGLS entered into a separate
agreement, as amended (the "High River Agreement"), with High River.
Pursuant to each of these agreements, the parties agreed to take certain
actions designed to cause RJR Nabisco to effectuate a spinoff of its food
business, Nabisco Holdings Corp. ("Nabisco"), at the earliest possible
date. Among other things, the Company agreed to solicit the holders of RJR
Nabisco common stock to adopt the Spinoff Resolution, which was an advisory
resolution to the Board of Directors of RJR Nabisco seeking a spinoff of
the 80.5% of Nabisco held by RJR Nabisco to stockholders. The High River
Agreement also provided that BGLS pay certain other fees to High River
under certain circumstances.
As of June 5, 1996, High River, the Company and BGLS terminated the High
River Agreement and New Valley, ALKI and High River terminated the New
Valley Agreement by mutual consent. The terminations leave in effect for
one year certain provisions of both the High River and New Valley
Agreements concerning payments to be made to High River in the event New
Valley achieves a profit (after deducting certain expenses) on the sale of
the shares of RJR Nabisco common stock which are held by it or they are
valued at the end of such year at higher than their purchase price or in
the event the Company or its affiliates engage in certain transactions with
RJR Nabisco.
On December 27, 1995, New Valley entered into an agreement with the Company
pursuant to which New Valley agreed to pay directly or reimburse the
Company and its subsidiaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in connection with the Company's solicitation of consents and proxies from
the stockholders of RJR Nabisco. New Valley has also agreed to pay to BGLS
a fee of 20% of the net profit received by New Valley or its subsidiaries
from the sale of shares of RJR Nabisco common stock after New Valley and
its subsidiaries have achieved a rate of return of 20% and after deduction
of certain expenses incurred by New Valley and its subsidiaries, including
the costs of the consent and proxy solicitations and of acquiring the
shares of common stock. New Valley has also agreed to indemnify the Company
and its affiliates against certain liabilities arising out of the
solicitations. During 1996, New Valley has reimbursed the Company and its
subsidiaries $2,370 pursuant to this agreement.
On December 28, 1995, New Valley, the Company and Liggett engaged Jefferies
& Company, Inc. ("Jefferies") to act as financial advisor in connection
with New Valley's investment in RJR Nabisco and the Company's solicitation
of consents and proxies. In connection with this engagement, New Valley
paid Jefferies $1,500 in 1995 and $1,538 in 1996. These companies also have
agreed to pay Jefferies 10% of the net profit (up to a maximum of $15,000)
with respect to RJR Nabisco common stock (including any distributions made
by RJR Nabisco) held or sold by these companies and their affiliates after
deduction of certain expenses, including the costs of the solicitations and
the costs of acquiring the shares of the common stock.
On December 29, 1995, the Company commenced solicitation of consents from
stockholders of RJR Nabisco seeking, among other things, the approval of
the Spinoff Resolution. In March 1996, the Company was informed that the
Spinoff Resolution was approved by the holders of a majority of RJR Nabisco
common stock.
On February 29, 1996, New Valley entered into a total return equity swap
transaction (the "Swap") with an unaffiliated company relating to 1,000,000
shares of RJR Nabisco common stock. During the
F-22
<PAGE> 24
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
third quarter of 1996, the Swap was terminated. New Valley recognized a
loss on the Swap of $7,305 for the year ended December 31, 1996.
On March 4, 1996, the Company commenced solicitation of proxies in favor of
its previously nominated slate of directors to replace RJR Nabisco's
incumbent Board of Directors at its 1996 annual meeting of stockholders. On
April 16, 1996, the Company announced that, based on the analysis of its
proxy solicitors, its nominees for election to the RJR Nabisco Board of
Directors would not be elected at RJR Nabisco's 1996 annual meeting of
stockholders. On November 5, 1996, the Company submitted to RJR Nabisco, in
order to comply with the requirements of RJR Nabisco's by-laws, a notice of
intent to nominate a slate of directors for election at the RJR Nabisco
1997 annual meeting of stockholders.
As of December 31, 1996, New Valley held approximately 1,700,000 shares of
RJR Nabisco common stock with a market value of $59,200 (cost of
approximately $53,400). As of March 14, 1997, New Valley held approximately
1,063,000 shares of RJR Nabisco common stock with a market value of $35,997
(cost of $32,574). During 1996 and 1995, New Valley expensed $11,724 and
$3,879, respectively, for costs relating to its RJR Nabisco investment.
Based on the market price of RJR Nabisco common stock at March 14, 1997, no
amounts are payable by the Company or New Valley under any of its net
profit-sharing arrangements with respect to the RJR Nabisco common stock
discussed above.
4. INVESTMENT IN BROOKE (OVERSEAS) LTD.
Prior to December 29, 1995, the Company did not consolidate Liggett-Ducat,
a Russian joint stock company, due to certain events continuing through
1995 which impaired the Company's ability to control the operations of
Liggett-Ducat. The amount invested in Russian ventures of $5,723 in 1994
was expensed, based on the determination that there was significant
uncertainty as to the recoverability of these amounts. The Company
reexamined the issue of consolidating Liggett-Ducat and at December 29,
1995 determined that a series of events in the latter part of 1995 (see
below) enabled the Company to exert sufficient control so that the
recoverability of its investment appeared reasonable.
During 1995, the Company increased its investment in Liggett-Ducat from
approximately 58% to 68% through a direct purchase of stock from other
shareholders. The Company recorded goodwill in the amount of $435 which is
being amortized over a ten-year period.
In October 1995, Liggett-Ducat entered into a loan agreement with
Vneshtorgbank, Moscow, Russia, pursuant to which Liggett-Ducat borrowed
$20,400 to fund real estate development. Interest on the note is based on
the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 10%. Principal repayments
are due from April through October of 1997. At December 31, 1996,
approximately $20,418 had been drawn down under the loan.
Also in October 1995, BML purchased certain buildings, which it had
previously leased from the Moscow Property Committee, for $4,369 excluding
related transaction costs. BML has developed, or is in the process of
developing, these buildings for commercial use.
On December 29, 1995, Liggett-Ducat relinquished its 59.4% ownership in a
joint real estate venture in exchange for 100% ownership of a partially
constructed manufacturing facility owned by the venture on the outskirts of
Moscow where Liggett-Ducat plans to build a new cigarette factory. In
connection with this exchange, a 49-year land lease was renegotiated in
1996 for the site on which
F-23
<PAGE> 25
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
the factory is to be built. Liggett-Ducat's cost basis in the joint real
estate venture of $2,675 was transferred to its basis in the new
manufacturing facility.
The additional amounts included in the financial statements as a result of
consolidating Liggett-Ducat at December 31, 1995 are as follows:
Current assets.................... $12,321
Total assets...................... 35,359
Current liabilities............... 10,602
Total liabilities................. 20,924
Stockholders' equity.............. 14,435
Revenues during 1995 from the date of consolidation (December 29, 1995) are
not material.
During the second quarter of 1996, the Company entered into stock purchase
agreements with the chairman of Liggett-Ducat and the former Director of
Liggett-Ducat's tobacco operations (the "Sellers"). Under the stock
purchase agreements, the Company acquired 142,558 shares held by the
Sellers for $2,143. The purchase price was payable in installments during
1996 and certain shares of Liggett-Ducat collateralize the Company's
obligation under both the purchase agreements and the consulting agreements
(described below).
Concurrently, the Company entered into consulting and non-compete
agreements with the Sellers. Under the terms of these agreements, the
Company will pay the Sellers a total of approximately $8,357 over five
years.
In December 1996, the Company purchased 46,337 additional shares of
Liggett-Ducat stock from other shareholders for $695. At December 31, 1996,
the Company's subsidiaries owned 95% of the stock of Liggett-Ducat.
In 1996, Russian tax authorities assessed Liggett-Ducat $7,600 for
outstanding tax liabilities, which amount was accrued in 1996. The
liability is payable in two parts, 50% within 2 1/2 years, the remaining
50% over the succeeding five years.
The performance of Liggett-Ducat's cigarette operations in Russia is
affected by uncertainties in Russia which may include, among others,
political or diplomatic developments, regional tensions, currency
repatriation restrictions, foreign exchange fluctuations, inflation, and an
undeveloped system of commercial laws and legislative reform relating to
foreign ownership in Russia.
F-24
<PAGE> 26
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUBSEQUENT EVENT:
Sale of BrookeMil:
On January 31, 1997, BOL sold all its shares of BML to New Valley for
$21,500 in cash and a promissory note of $33,500 payable $21,500 on June
30, 1997 and $12,000 on December 31, 1997 with interest at 9%. The
consideration received exceeded the carrying value of its investment in BML
by $43,700. The Company expects to recognize a gain on the sale in 1997 in
the amount of $21,300. The remaining $22,400 will be deferred in
recognition of the fact that the Company retains an interest in BML through
its 42% equity ownership in New Valley and that a portion of the property
sold is subject to a put option held by New Valley. The option allows New
Valley under certain circumstances, to put a portion of the property sold
back to the Company at the greater of the appraised fair value of the
property at the date of exercise or $13,600.
In connection with the sale of its BML shares to New Valley, certain
specified liabilities aggregating $40,800, including the Vneshtorgbank loan
with a balance of $20,419, remained with BML, and New Valley indemnified
the Company and its subsidiaries with respect to such liabilities.
On or about March 13, 1997, a shareholder derivative suit was filed against
New Valley, as a nominal defendant, its directors and the Company in the
Delaware Chancery Court, by a shareholder of New Valley. The suit alleges
that New Valley's purchase of the BML Shares constituted a self-dealing
transaction which involved the payment of excessive consideration by New
Valley. The plaintiff seeks (i) a declaration that New Valley's directors
breached their fiduciary duties, the Company aided and abetted such
breaches and such parties are therefore liable to New Valley, and (ii)
unspecified damages to be awarded to New Valley. The Company's time to
respond to the complaint has not yet expired. The Company believes that the
allegations are without merit, and it intends to defend the suit
vigorously.
5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
A summary of discontinued operations follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
1996 1995 1994
----------------- ---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Loss) income from discontinued operations:
New Valley........................................ $(1,591) $ 1,800
MAI............................................... 698 $ 3,628
SkyBox............................................ 362 20,065
------- ------ --------
(1,591) 2,860 23,693
------- ------ --------
Gain from disposal of operations:
New Valley........................................ 3,976 5,231 139,935
SkyBox............................................ 13,138 11,055
------- ------ --------
3,976 18,369 150,990
------- ------ --------
Income from discontinued operations................... $ 2,385 $21,229 $174,683
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
F-25
<PAGE> 27
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Net revenues of MAI Systems Corporation ("MAI") for the period January 1,
1995 to February 6, 1995 were $6,652 and for the year ended December 31,
1994 was $66,095.
New Valley:
During the fourth quarter of 1994, New Valley sold or was in the process of
selling virtually all of its current operations. In connection with the
implementation of the provisions of the Joint Plan, New Valley completed
the sale of Western Union Financial Services Inc. and certain other assets
to First Financial Management Corporation ("FFMC"). Accordingly, the
financial statements of the Company reflect its portion of the gain
($139,935) in gain on disposal of discontinued operations in 1994.
On October 31, 1995, New Valley sold substantially all the assets of its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Western Union Data Services Company, Inc. (the
"Messaging Service Business"), and conveyed substantially all of the
liabilities of the Messaging Service Business to FFMC for $17,540 in cash
and $2,460 in cancellation of intercompany indebtedness. The financial
statements of the Company reflect its portion of the gain ($5,231) in gain
on disposal of discontinued operations in 1995.
In October 1996, Thinking Machines adopted a plan to terminate its parallel
processing computer sales and service business. Consequently, the operating
results of this segment, including the write-down of certain assets,
principally inventory, to their net realizable value by $6,100 have been
classified as discontinued operations. The financial statements of the
Company reflect its portion of the loss from operations ($1,591) and the
gain on disposal ($3,976) in discontinued operations.
MAI:
On February 1, 1994, the Company renegotiated a December 21, 1992 agreement
with an unrelated third party which enabled the Company to purchase
additional MAI equity for $3,565 in the reorganized entity which had
emerged from bankruptcy on November 18, 1993. When combined with the
interest originally received in the MAI reorganization, total common
ownership held by the Company at December 31, 1994 was approximately 65.2%.
In addition, in connection with a transaction wherein MAI's United States
and Canadian bank lenders took title to the stock of MAI's European
subsidiaries in satisfaction of a total of approximately $84,000 of
indebtedness owed by MAI to such bank lenders, the Company may be required,
under certain limited circumstances, to purchase an equity interest of up
to $7,500 in a holding company controlled by the bank lenders. The $7,500
is recorded as a liability.
On January 25, 1995, the Board of Directors of BGLS determined to declare a
dividend of the stock of MAI to the Company with the intention of the
Company distributing a special dividend of MAI common stock to its
stockholders (the "MAI Distribution"). Accordingly, the Company approved
the MAI Distribution of the 65.2% equity interest in MAI through a special
dividend to its stockholders of one share of MAI for every six shares of
the Company's common stock. The distribution occurred on February 13, 1995.
As a result, MAI has been treated as a discontinued operation in the
financial statements for all periods presented. The MAI Distribution
reduced the Company's stockholders' equity (deficit) by $27,085 in the
first quarter of 1995.
F-26
<PAGE> 28
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
SkyBox:
During 1994 and the first quarter of 1995, the Company sold all of its
remaining common stock of its former subsidiary, SkyBox International Inc.
("SkyBox"), for approximately $20,000. In addition, during the same period
SkyBox redeemed the 220 shares of SkyBox Series A Preferred Stock which the
Company held for $22,000.
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1996 1995
----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Finished goods....................................... $15,304 $19,129
Work-in-process...................................... 4,435 3,570
Raw materials........................................ 34,002 29,021
Replacement parts and supplies....................... 4,406 4,903
------- -------
Inventories at current cost.......................... 58,147 56,623
LIFO adjustments..................................... (4,456) 3,899
------- -------
$53,691 $60,522
======= =======
</TABLE>
The Company has a leaf inventory management program whereby, among other
things, it is committed to purchase certain quantities of leaf tobacco. The
purchase commitments are for quantities not in excess of anticipated
requirements and are at prices, including carrying costs, established at
the date of the commitment. At December 31, 1996, Liggett had leaf tobacco
purchase commitments of approximately $20,116.
7. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1996 1995
----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land and improvements................................ $ 455 $ 542
Buildings............................................ 14,205 13,661
Machinery and equipment.............................. 49,401 42,877
Leasehold improvements............................... 302 309
Construction-in-progress............................. 46,966 18,286
-------- --------
111,329 75,675
Less accumulated depreciation........................ (31,047) (27,323)
-------- --------
$ 80,282 $ 48,352
======== ========
</TABLE>
The amounts provided for depreciation for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994 were $4,412, $4,699 and $4,609, respectively.
F-27
<PAGE> 29
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
The amount of capitalized interest included in property, plant and
equipment is $6,387 and $1,004 in 1996 and 1995, respectively.
8. SALE OF ASSETS
On July 15, 1996, the Company sold substantially all of the non-cash assets
and certain liabilities of COM Products, Inc. ("COM"), a subsidiary engaged
in the business of selling micrographics equipment and supplies, for
approximately $3,700 cash and a promissory note for $500. The Company
recognized a gain of approximately $3,000 on this transaction.
On May 14, 1996, Liggett sold to the County of Durham certain surplus
realty for $4,300. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $3,600.
Subsequent Event:
On January 31, 1997, BOL sold BML to New Valley for $21,500 in cash and a
promissory note of $33,500 payable $21,500 on June 30, 1997 and $12,000 on
December 31, 1997. (Refer to Note 4.)
On March 11, 1997, Liggett sold to Blue Devil Ventures, a North Carolina
limited liability partnership, additional surplus realty for $2,200. A gain
of approximately $1,600 is expected to be recognized in 1997.
9. NOTES PAYABLE, LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Notes payable, long-term debt and other obligations consist of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1996 1995
----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
15.75% Series B Senior Secured Notes due 2001,
net of unamortized discount of $1,511................. $231,353
13.75% Series 2 Senior Secured Notes due 1997............. $ 91,179
16.125% Senior Subordinated Reset Notes due 1997.......... 5,670
14.500% Subordinated Debentures due 1998.................. 800 126,295
Notes payable - Foreign................................... 22,668 11,122
Other..................................................... 2,425 2,084
Liggett:
11.500% Senior Secured Series B Notes due 1999, net of
unamortized discount of $0 and $424, respectively..... 119,688 119,485
Variable Rate Series C Senior Secured Notes due 1999...... 32,279 32,279
Revolving credit facility................................. 24,272 21,017
-------- --------
Total notes payable and long-term debt.................... 433,485 409,131
Less:
Current maturities.................................... 55,242 2,387
-------- --------
Amount due after one year................................. $378,243 $406,744
======== ========
</TABLE>
F-28
<PAGE> 30
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
OFFER TO EXCHANGE:
15.75% SERIES A SENIOR SECURED NOTES DUE 2001 FOR 13.75% SERIES 2
SENIOR SECURED NOTES DUE 1997, AND
15.75% SERIES B SENIOR SECURED NOTES DUE 2001 FOR 16.125% SENIOR
SUBORDINATED RESET NOTES DUE 1997 AND 14.500% SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES:
On November 27, 1995, BGLS commenced an offer to exchange a total of
$232,864 principal amount of 15.75% Senior Secured Notes due January 31,
2001, for all its outstanding Series 2 Notes, Reset Notes and Subordinated
Debentures. The exchange ratio was $1,087.47 principal amount of new 15.75%
Series A Senior Secured Notes ("Series A Notes") for each $1,000 principal
amount of Series 2 Notes exchanged, $1,132.28 principal amount of new
Series B Notes for each $1,000 principal amount of Reset Notes exchanged
and $1,000 principal amount of new Series B Notes for each $1,000 principal
amount of Subordinated Debentures exchanged. The new Series A Notes and the
new Series B Notes were identical except that the Series B Notes were not
subject to restrictions on transfer.
The exchange offer closed on January 30, 1996. All $91,179 of the Series 2
Notes and $125,495 of the Subordinated Debentures were exchanged. In
addition, BGLS cancelled all of the Subordinated Debentures ($13,705) held
by the Company. Subordinated Debentures in the amount of $800 remain
outstanding. As part of the exchange offer, substantially all of the
covenants and events of default were eliminated pertaining to the
Subordinated Debentures.
Holders of Reset Notes did not exchange, and the Reset Notes were redeemed
on March 29, 1996 for a total amount of $5,785, including premium, together
with accrued interest of $452. On March 7, 1996, an additional $7,397 face
amount of Series A Notes were sold for $6,300 including accrued interest
with the proceeds being used for the redemption of the Reset Notes.
Pursuant to a registered exchange offer, holders of the Series A Notes
exchanged all of the $107,373 outstanding principal amount for an equal
principal amount of Series B Notes. The exchange closed March 21, 1996. The
Company has cancelled all the Series A Notes.
The new Series B Notes are collateralized by substantially all of BGLS'
assets, including a pledge of BGLS' equity interests in Liggett, BOL and NV
Holdings as well as a pledge of all of the New Valley securities held by
BGLS and NV Holdings. The BGLS Series B Notes Indenture contains certain
covenants, which among other things, limit the ability of BGLS to make
distributions to the Company to $6,000 per year ($12,000 if less than 50%
of the Series B Notes remain outstanding), limit additional indebtedness of
BGLS to $10,000, limit guaranties of subsidiary indebtedness by BGLS to
$50,000, and restrict certain transactions with affiliates that exceed
$2,000 in any year subject to certain exceptions which include payments to
the Company not to exceed $6,500 per year for permitted operating expenses,
payment of the Chairman's salary and bonus and certain other expenses, fees
and payments. In addition, the Indenture contains certain restrictions on
the ability of the Chairman and certain of his affiliates to enter into
certain transactions with, and receive payments above specified levels
from, New Valley. The Series B Notes may be redeemed, in whole or in part,
through December 31, 1999 at a price of 101% of the principal amount and
thereafter at 100%. Interest is payable at the rate of 15.75% per annum on
January 31 and July 31 of each year, except for the period ended July 31,
1996 when interest was payable at 13.75% from October 1, 1995 to January
30, 1996 and at 15.75% from January 31, 1996 through July 31, 1996.
The Company recorded an extraordinary charge of approximately $9,700 for
the year ended December 31, 1995 relating to the exchanged debt securities
discussed above.
F-29
<PAGE> 31
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
13.75% SERIES 1 SENIOR SECURED NOTES DUE 1995
13.75% SERIES 2 SENIOR SECURED NOTES DUE 1997:
An Exchange and Termination Agreement (the "1994 Exchange Agreement") was
entered into as of September 30, 1994 among the Company, BGLS and certain
holders ("Participating Holders") of the 16.125% Senior Subordinated Reset
Notes due 1997 ("Reset Notes") and the 14.500% Subordinated Debentures due
1998 ("Subordinated Debentures") pursuant to which certain prior agreements
among the parties were terminated. The Participating Holders had advanced
$13,702 to BGLS under the prior agreements. In related transactions with
the same Participating Holders, BGLS issued $23,594 of 13.75% Series 1
Senior Secured Notes due 1995 ("Series 1 Notes") to the same Participating
Holders in consideration of the transfer to BGLS of previously issued
Senior Secured Notes, on account of new loans by the same holders in
respect of certain interest payable and to cover certain expenses of the
Participating Holders. On June 12, 1995, BGLS redeemed all the Series 1
Notes in the amount of $23,594 plus accrued interest of $670.
Under the 1994 Exchange Agreement, on October 3, 1994 BGLS exchanged an
aggregate of $49,900 of new BGLS 13.75% Series 2 Senior Secured Notes due
1997 ("Series 2 Notes") for an equal principal amount of Reset Notes. In
connection with the 1995 Exchange Offer, all of the Series 2 Notes were
exchanged for Senior Secured Notes and no Series 2 Notes remain
outstanding. BGLS and the Company also agreed, subject to applicable
securities laws, to offer the other holders of the Reset Notes the
opportunity to exchange the Reset Notes for the Series 2 Notes. That offer
commenced October 21, 1994 and was closed December 12, 1994. An additional
$33,675 of the Reset Notes were exchanged.
LIGGETT 11.500% SENIOR SECURED SERIES B NOTES DUE 1999:
On February 14, 1992, Liggett issued $150,000 in Senior Secured Notes (the
"Liggett Series B Notes"). Interest on the Liggett Series B Notes is
payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 at an annual rate of 11.5%.
The Liggett Series B Notes and Series C Notes referred to below
(collectively, the "Liggett Notes") require mandatory principal redemptions
of $7,500 on February 1 in each of the years 1993 through 1997 and $37,500
on February 1, 1998 with the balance of the Liggett Notes due on February
1, 1999. In February 1997, $7,500 of Liggett B Notes were purchased using
the Facility and credited against the mandatory redemption requirements.
The transaction resulted in a net gain of $2,963. The Liggett Notes are
collateralized by substantially all of the assets of Liggett, excluding
inventories and receivables. Eve Holdings Inc. is a guarantor for the
Liggett Notes. The Liggett Notes may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at a
price equal to 102% and 100% of the principal amount in the years 1997 and
1998, respectively, at the option of Liggett. The Liggett Notes contain
restrictions on Liggett's ability to declare or pay cash dividends, incur
additional debt, grant liens and enter into any new agreements with
affiliates, among others. While Liggett management currently intends to
seek to refinance and/or restructure with Liggett's note holders the
February 1, 1998 mandatory redemption payment of $37,500 and the $107,400
payment due on February 1, 1999 on maturity of the Liggett Notes and to
extend its revolving credit facility, there are no refinancing or
restructuring arrangements for the notes or commitments to extend the
facility at this time, and no assurances can be given in this regard.
ISSUANCE OF LIGGETT SERIES C VARIABLE RATE NOTES:
On January 31, 1994, Liggett issued $22,500 of Variable Rate Series C
Senior Secured Notes Due 1999 (the "Liggett Series C Notes"). The Liggett
Series C Notes bore a 16.5% interest rate, which
F-30
<PAGE> 32
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
was reset on February 1, 1995 to 19.75%, the maximum reset rate. Liggett
had received the necessary consents from the required percentage of holders
of Liggett Series B Notes allowing for an aggregate principal amount up to
but not exceeding $32,850 of Liggett Series C Notes to be issued under the
Liggett Series C Notes indenture. The Series C Notes have the same terms
(other than interest rate) and stated maturity as the Liggett Series B
Notes. In connection with the consents, holders of Liggett Series B Notes
received Liggett Series C Notes totaling $2,842 or 2% of their then current
Liggett Series B Notes holdings. Liggett issued the remaining $7,508 of
Series C Notes in November 1994.
On January 26, 1995, the Company sold the Series C Notes it held in face
amount of $2,935.
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY - LIGGETT:
On March 8, 1994, Liggett entered into a revolving credit facility (the
"Facility") for $40,000 with a syndicate of commercial banks. The Facility
is collateralized by all inventories and receivables of Liggett. At
December 31, 1996, $24,272 was outstanding and $13,098 was available under
the Facility. Borrowings under the Facility bore interest at the rate of
9.75%, a rate which is equal to 1.5% above the Philadelphia National Bank's
prime rate (8.25%) at December 31, 1996. The Facility requires Liggett's
compliance with certain financial and other covenants. The Facility also
limits the amount of cash dividends and distributions by Liggett. In
addition, the Facility imposes requirements with respect to Liggett's
adjusted net worth (not to fall below a deficit of $175,000 as computed in
accordance with the agreement) and working capital (not to fall below a
deficit of $35,000 as computed in accordance with the agreement). The
Facility is classified as short-term at December 31, 1996, as it was due on
March 8, 1997. In January 1997, the Facility was extended for a one-year
period ending March 8, 1998. No assurances can be given that the Facility
will be further extended.
During the first quarter of 1997, Liggett violated the working capital
covenant contained in the Facility as a result of the 1998 mandatory
redemption payment on the Liggett Notes becoming due within one year.
On March 19, 1997, the lead lender agreed to waive this covenant default,
and the Facility was amended as follows: (i) the working capital definition
was changed to exclude the Liggett Notes; (ii) the maximum permitted
working capital deficit was reduced to $12,000; (iii) the maximum permitted
adjusted net worth deficit was increased to $180,000; and (iv) the
permitted advance rates under the Facility for eligible inventory were
reduced by five percent.
FOREIGN LOANS:
In October, 1995, Liggett-Ducat, a subsidiary of BOL, entered into a
construction loan agreement with Vneshtorgbank, Moscow, Russia for a period
of two years on behalf of BML for $20,400. The interest rate is the London
Interbank Offered Rate, which was 5.55% and 5.66% at December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively, plus 10%. The outstanding balance at December 31, 1996
on the loan, which was assigned to BML on December 19, 1996, was $20,400.
Deferred financing fees of approximately $4,044 were recorded and are being
amortized over the term of the loan. (Refer to Note 4.)
In January 1996, Liggett-Ducat entered into a revolving credit facility for
$1,667 with the same bank. The facility was denominated in rubles and is
due within 180 days with an automatic renewal. Because the credit facility
exists in a hyperinflationary economy, it bore interest at a rate of 85%
per annum. During September 1996, this facility was fully retired.
F-31
<PAGE> 33
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled Maturities:
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt for each of the next five years are
as follows:
1997..................... $55,242
1998..................... 39,516
1999..................... 107,374
2000.....................
2001..................... 231,353
Thereafter...............
--------
$433,485
========
10. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
Liggett:
During the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, Liggett offered
severance and benefit programs to reduce personnel costs on an ongoing
basis. These programs resulted in a charge to operations of $3,428 and
$2,548, respectively.
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Benefit Retirement Plans:
The Company sponsors several defined benefit pension plans, covering
virtually all of Liggett's full-time employees. These plans provide pension
benefits for eligible employees based primarily on their compensation and
length of service. Contributions are made to the pension plans in amounts
necessary to meet the minimum funding requirements of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").
In a continuing effort to reduce operating expenses, all defined benefit
plans were frozen between 1993 and 1995 and several early retirement
windows were offered in 1995 and 1996. As a result of these actions, the
Company recorded a curtailment charge (see table below).
The Company's net pension expense consists of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost - benefits earned during the period..... $ 350 $ 454 $ 1,140
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation........ 12,241 12,850 12,363
Actual return on assets.............................. (21,143) (23,501) (5,144)
Curtailment related to plan restructuring............ 1,463 1,550 691
Net amortization and deferral........................ 7,384 9,547 (8,337)
--------- --------- ----------
$ 295 $ 900 $ 713
========= ========= ==========
</TABLE>
In accordance with SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions," the
overfunded and underfunded plans with respect to the accumulated benefit
obligation at December 31, 1996 have been segregated for financial
statement presentation. All plans were underfunded with respect to the
F-32
<PAGE> 34
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 1995. An analysis of the
funded status of the Company's defined benefit pension plans and amounts
recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 1996 and 1995 for the
pension plans are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1996 1995
---------------------------------- ------------
Assets Exceed Accumulated Accumulated
Accumulated Benefits Exceed Benefits Exceed
Benefits Assets Assets
---------------- ----------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
Vested benefit obligation............... $155,612 $2,900 $166,448
======== ====== ========
Accumulated benefit obligation.......... $160,587 $2,915 $172,317
======== ====== ========
Projected benefit obligation............ $160,587 $2,915 $172,317
Plan assets at fair value..................... 169,845 163,913
-------- ------ --------
Projected benefit obligation (less than) in
excess of plan assets................... (9,258) 2,915 8,404
Unrecognized net gain (loss).................. 28,221 (976) 14,449
Curtailment liability......................... 1,463
Adjustment required to recognize minimum
liability............................... 976 976
-------- ------ --------
Pension liability before purchase accounting
valuation adjustments................... 20,426 2,915 23,829
Purchase accounting valuation adjustments
related to income taxes................. (3,425) (3,773)
-------- ------ --------
Net pension liability included in the balance
sheets.................................. $ 17,001 $2,915 $ 20,056
======== ====== ========
</TABLE>
Assumptions used in the determination of net pension expense and the
actuarial present value of benefit obligations were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Discount rates............................................ 6.25 - 8.00% 6.25 - 8.50%
Accrued rates of return on invested assets................ 9.0% 9.0%
Salary increase assumptions............................... N/A N/A
per annum per annum
</TABLE>
Plan assets consist of commingled funds, marketable equity securities and
corporate and government debt securities.
Postretirement Medical and Life Insurance Plans:
BGLS and Liggett
Substantially all of Liggett's United States employees are eligible for
certain postretirement benefits if they reach retirement age while working
for the Company. Effective January 1, 1995, retirees are required to fund
100% of participant medical premiums.
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 are as follows:
F-33
<PAGE> 35
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost, benefits attributed to employee
service during the year...................................... $ 68 $ 68 $ 63
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation........................................... 829 970 1,037
Charge for special termination benefits........................... 489
Amortization of net (gain) loss................................... (92) (26) 33
---- ------ ------
Net periodic postretirement benefit expense....................... $805 $1,501 $1,133
==== ====== ======
</TABLE>
The following sets forth the actuarial present value of the Accumulated
Postretirement Benefit Obligation ("APBO") at December 31, 1996 and 1995
applicable to each employee group for benefits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Retired employees................................................. $ 7,899 $ 8,673
Active employees - fully eligible................................. 674 1,707
Active employees - not fully eligible............................. 515 1,078
------- --------
APBO......................................................... 9,088 11,458
Unrecognized net gain............................................. 3,324 1,339
Purchase accounting valuation adjustment related to
income taxes................................................. (1,072) (1,181)
------- -------
Postretirement liability.......................................... $11,340 $11,616
======= =======
</TABLE>
The APBO at December 31, 1996 was determined using a discount rate of 8%
and health care cost trend rates of 4%. A 1% increase in the trend rate for
health care costs would have increased the APBO and net periodic
postretirement benefit cost by $419 and $32, respectively, for the year
ended December 31, 1996. The Company does not hold any assets reserved for
use in the plan.
Profit Sharing Plan:
Liggett
The 401(k) plans originally called for Liggett contributions matching up to
a 3% employee contribution, plus additional Liggett contributions of up to
6% of salary based on the achievement of Liggett's profit objectives.
Effective January 1, 1994, Liggett suspended the 3% match for the salaried
employees' 401(k) Plan, but reinstated it on April 1, 1996. Liggett
contributed and expensed $2,712, $900 and $420 to the 401(k) plans for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
12. INCOME TAXES
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return that includes
its more than 80%-owned United States subsidiaries. At December 31, 1996,
the Company had $90,646 of unrecognized net deferred tax assets, comprised
primarily of net operating loss carryforwards, available to offset future
taxable income for federal tax purposes. A valuation allowance has been
provided against this deferred tax asset as it is presently deemed more
likely than not that the benefit of the tax asset will not be utilized. The
Company continues to evaluate the realizability of its deferred tax assets
and its estimate is subject to change.
F-34
<PAGE> 36
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
The amounts provided for income taxes are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
U.S. Federal..................................... $ $(24,714)
Foreign.......................................... 1,454
State............................................ (52) $ 342 227
-------- ----- --------
Total provision (benefit) for
continuing operations............................. $ 1,402 $ 342 $(24,487)
======== ===== ========
</TABLE>
The tax effect of temporary differences which give rise to a significant
portion of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995
----------------------------- -----------------------------
Deferred Tax Deferred Tax Deferred Tax Deferred Tax
Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales and product allowances....... $ 2,504 $ 2,337
Inventory.......................... 1,270 683 831 $ 1,280
Coupon accruals.................... 4,492 3,198
Property, plant and equipment...... 5,218 6,200
Employee benefit plan accruals..... 13,193 13,249
Debt restructuring charges......... 22,334 5,702
Excess of tax basis over book basis-
non-consolidated entities....... 9,467 4,327
Excess of book basis over tax basis-
non-consolidated entities....... 5,166 5,564
Legal settlements.................. 2,910 3,556
Net operating loss carryforwards... 45,543 54,860
Valuation allowance................ (90,646) (73,955)
Reclassifications.................. (11,067) (11,067) (13,044) (13,044)
-------- --------- -------- --------
$ $ $ 1,061 $
======== ========= ======== ========
</TABLE>
Differences between the amounts provided for income taxes and amounts
computed at the federal statutory tax rate are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes................................ $(63,516) $(45,002) $(42,478)
======== ======== ========
Federal income tax (benefit) at statutory rate....... (22,231) (15,751) (14,867)
Increases (decreases) resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal income tax
benefits.......................................... (34) 342 148
Foreign taxes...................................... 1,454
Changes in valuation allowance..................... 21,471 11,810 14,432
Other.............................................. 742 3,941
Reduction of reserves.............................. (24,200)
-------- --------- --------
Provision (benefit) for income tax................ $ 1,402 $ 342 $(24,487)
======== ========= ========
</TABLE>
The Company favorably settled an audit with the Internal Revenue Service in
the third quarter of 1994 and has adjusted its reserves accordingly.
At December 31, 1996, the Company and its consolidated group had net
operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $114,000
which may be subject to certain restrictions and limitations and which will
expire in the years 2006 to 2009.
F-35
<PAGE> 37
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
13. COMMITMENTS
Certain of the Company's subsidiaries lease certain facilities and
equipment used in its operations under both month-to-month and fixed-term
agreements. The aggregate minimum rentals under operating leases with
noncancelable terms for one year or more are as follows:
Year ending December 31:
1997.......................... $ 5,578
1998.......................... 4,130
1999.......................... 2,120
2000.......................... 1,310
2001.......................... 650
2002 and thereafter........... 33,918
-------
$47,706
=======
Lease commitments for 2002 and thereafter relate primarily to the remaining
45 years of a land lease and 23 years of an equipment lease in
Russia.
The total of minimum rentals to be received in the future by certain of the
Company's subsidiaries under noncancelable subleases are $126 for the year
ending December 31, 1997.
The Company's rental expense for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995
and 1994 was $5,471, $4,449 and $4,808, respectively.
14. EQUITY
Series G Preferred Stock:
During 1993 and 1994, special dividends payable on the Series G Preferred
Stock in connection with the distribution of SkyBox shares to the Company's
shareholders were accelerated and paid in two parts. To the extent that
such dividends were utilized to facilitate the repayment or defrayal of
certain debt obligations to the Company, cash dividends were disbursed or
dividends were waived to satisfy such obligations. The remaining portion of
the special dividend was payable in four installments on January 1, April
1, July 1 and October 1, 1994 payable in cash or shares of common stock at
the option of the Company using the prime rate announced by Citibank, N.A.
discounted by the number of days between the installment payment date and
October 6, 1994, the date the special dividend was to have been paid out.
(Refer to Note 17.) At December 31, 1994, all Series G Preferred Stock had
been converted into Company common stock.
Treasury Stock:
For information concerning the exercise in 1994 of a warrant for 607,889
shares of the Company's common stock. (Refer to Note 17.)
In 1995 and 1994, pursuant to a Stock Grant Agreement, the Company
purchased 33,748 and 41,641 shares of common stock, respectively, from two
former employees at market price. During 1995, the Company issued, in the
aggregate, 270,000 shares from treasury.
F-36
<PAGE> 38
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
15. STOCK PLANS
The Company's Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") provides that options and
stock appreciation rights ("SAR's") for up to 400,000 shares of common
stock may be granted to officers and other key employees of the Company.
All options must be granted on or before the tenth anniversary of the
effective date of the Plan (September 1, 1997) and at prices not less than
the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. The exercise price
may be paid in cash or in shares of the Company's common stock having a
fair market value equal to the cash amount for which it was substituted.
Shares received upon exercise of a portion of an option may be applied
automatically at their fair market value to purchase additional portions of
the option. Shares relating to options that expire or are canceled are
added back to shares authorized for future grants. At December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, no options were outstanding; however, there were 212,400
shares available to be granted under this Plan.
On December 16, 1996, the Company entered into a Stock Option Agreement
(the "Agreement") with a consultant who serves as a director and President
of New Valley. The Agreement granted such consultant non-qualified stock
options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an
exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options, which will become
exercisable over a ten-year term, vest in six equal annual installments
beginning on July 1, 1997. Pursuant to the Agreement, common stock dividend
equivalents are paid on each vested and unexercised option. The Company
estimated the fair value of such grants on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a
risk-free interest rate of 6.4%, expected life of 10 years, volatility of
81.4% and no expected dividends or forfeiture. Under this model the fair
value of stock options granted in 1996 was $4,750. The Company recognized
expense of $64 for the year ended 1996.
As of January 1, 1994, the Company had granted 500,000 shares of restricted
common stock to the same consultant. Of the total number of shares granted,
250,000 were immediately vested and issued during the third quarter. The
remaining 250,000 shares were issued in 1995 and will vest in 1997. In
addition, on January 25, 1995, the Company entered into a nonqualified
stock option agreement with the same consultant. Under the agreement,
options to purchase 500,000 shares were granted at $2.00 per share. The
options are exercisable over a ten-year period, beginning with 20% on the
grant date and 20% on each of the four anniversaries of the grant date. The
grant provides for dividend equivalent rights on all the shares underlying
the options.
During 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company recorded charges to income of $222,
$557 and $781, respectively, for compensation based on estimates of the
fair market value for the shares and options granted. In 1996 and 1995, the
Company also recorded charges to income of $150 and $150 for the dividend
equivalent rights.
Subsequent Event:
As of January 1, 1997, the Company granted to employees of the Company
non-qualified stock options to purchase 422,000 shares of the Company's
common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The options, which
will become exercisable over a ten-year term, vest in six equal annual
installments.
F-37
<PAGE> 39
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
16. CONTINGENCIES
Tobacco-Related Litigation:
Since 1954, Liggett and other United States cigarette manufacturers have
been named as defendants in a number of direct and third-party actions
predicated on the theory that they should be liable for damages from cancer
and other adverse health effects alleged to have been caused by cigarette
smoking or by exposure to secondary smoke (environmental tobacco smoke,
"ETS") from cigarettes. These cases are reported hereinafter as though
having been commenced against Liggett (without regard to whether such
actually were commenced against the Company or Liggett). New cases continue
to be commenced against Liggett and other cigarette manufacturers. As new
cases are commenced, the costs associated with defending such cases and the
risks attendant to the inherent unpredictability of litigation continue to
increase. Liggett had been receiving certain financial and other assistance
from others in the industry in defraying the costs and other burdens
incurred in the defense of smoking and health litigation and related
proceedings, but these benefits have recently ended. Certain joint defense
arrangements, and the financial benefits incident thereto, have also ended.
The future financial impact on the Company of the termination of this
assistance and the effects of the tobacco litigation settlements discussed
below is not quantifiable at this time.
As of March 14, 1997, there were 108 cases pending against Liggett where
individual plaintiffs allege injury resulting from cigarette smoking,
addiction to cigarette smoking or exposure to ETS and seek compensatory
and, in some cases, punitive damages. Of these, 58 are pending in the State
of Florida and 19 are pending in the State of New York. The balance of
individual cases are pending in 13 different states. The next individual
case scheduled for trial where Liggett is a defendant is CHUTZ-REYMERS V.
LIGGETT GROUP INC., ET AL, United States District Court, Middle District of
Florida, Tampa Division, which is scheduled for trial in June 1997. In
light of the settlements discussed below, this case will not proceed
against Liggett on that date. In addition to the foregoing, there are four
individual cases scheduled for trial in 1997 where Liggett is a defendant,
although trial dates are subject to change.
The plaintiffs' allegations of liability in those cases in which
individuals seek recovery for personal injuries allegedly caused by
cigarette smoking are based on various theories of recovery, including
negligence, gross negligence, strict liability, fraud, misrepresentation,
design defect, failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranties,
conspiracy, concert of action, unjust enrichment, common law public
nuisance, indemnity, market share liability, and violations of deceptive
trade practices laws and antitrust statutes. Plaintiffs also seek punitive
damages in many of these cases. Defenses raised by defendants in these
cases include lack of proximate cause, assumption of the risk, comparative
fault and/or contributory negligence, lack of design defect, statute of
limitations, equitable defenses such as "unclean hands" and lack
of benefit, failure to state a claim and preemption by the Federal
Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, as amended (the "Act"). Several
representative cases are described below.
On June 24, 1992, in the action entitled CIPOLLONE V. LIGGETT GROUP INC.,
ET AL., the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion concluding that
the Act did not preempt state common law damage claims but that The Public
Health Cigarette Smoking Act of 1969 (the "1969 Act"), did preempt certain,
but not all, state common law damage claims. The decision bars plaintiffs
from asserting claims that, after the effective date of the 1969 Act, the
tobacco companies either failed to warn adequately of the claimed health
risks of cigarette smoking or sought to neutralize those claimed risks in
their advertising or promotion of cigarettes. Bills have been introduced in
Congress on
F-38
<PAGE> 40
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
occasion to eliminate the federal preemption defense. Enactment of any
federal legislation with such an effect could result in a significant
increase in claims, liabilities and litigation costs.
On March 27, 1987, an action entitled YVONNE ROGERS V. LIGGETT GROUP INC.
ET AL., Superior Court, Marion County, Indiana, was filed against Liggett
and others. The plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages for
cancer alleged to have been caused by cigarette smoking. Trial commenced on
January 31, 1995. The trial ended on February 22, 1995 when the trial court
declared a mistrial due to the jury's inability to reach a verdict. The
Court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants as to the issue of
punitive damages during the trial of this action. A second trial commenced
on August 5, 1996 and, on August 23, 1996, the jury returned a verdict in
favor of the defendants. A Notice of Appeal has been filed by the
plaintiff.
On October 31, 1991, an action entitled BROIN, ET AL. V. PHILIP MORRIS
INCORPORATED, ET AL., Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial District in
and for Dade County, Florida, was filed against Liggett and others. This
case was the first class action commenced against the industry, and has
been brought by plaintiffs on behalf of all flight attendants that have
worked or are presently working for airlines based in the United States and
who have never regularly smoked cigarettes but allege that they have been
damaged by involuntary exposure to ETS. Plaintiff's motion to certify the
action as a class action was granted. The suit is scheduled to go to trial
on June 2, 1997. In addition to Broin, as of March 25, 1997 there were 12
actions which have either been certified as a class or are seeking class
certification. One of these actions, ENGLE, ET AL. V. R. J. REYNOLDS
TOBACCO COMPANY, ET AL., Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in
and for Dade County, Florida, involving a certified class of smokers in the
State of Florida, is scheduled to commence trial on September 8, 1997.
On May 12, 1992, an action entitled CORDOVA V. LIGGETT GROUP INC., ET AL.,
Superior Court of the State of California, City of San Diego, was filed
against Liggett and others. In her complaint, plaintiff, purportedly on
behalf of the general public, alleges that defendants have been engaged in
unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business practices by allegedly
misrepresenting and concealing from the public scientific studies
pertaining to smoking and health funded by, and misrepresenting the
independence of, the Council on Tobacco Research ("CTR") and its
predecessor. The complaint seeks equitable relief against the defendants,
including the imposition of a corrective advertising campaign, restitution
of funds, disgorgement of revenues and profits and the imposition of a
constructive trust. The case is presently in the discovery phase. This
action is scheduled for trial on December 12, 1997. A similar action has
been filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, City of San
Francisco.
On September 10, 1993, an action entitled SACKMAN V. LIGGETT GROUP INC.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Eastern District of New York, was filed
against Liggett alleging as injury lung cancer. On May 25, 1996, the
District Court granted Liggett summary judgment on plaintiffs' fraud and
breach of warranty claims. In addition, the District Court vacated the
Magistrate's March 19, 1996 order compelling Liggett to produce certain CTR
documents with respect to which Liggett had asserted various privilege
claims, and allowed the other cigarette manufacturers and the CTR to
intervene in order to assert their interests and privileges with respect to
those same documents. The Magistrate Judge is presently reconsidering
plaintiffs' motion to compel production of documents. No trial date has
been set.
On March 25, 1994, an action entitled CASTANO, ET AL. V. THE AMERICAN
TOBACCO COMPANY INC., ET AL., United States District Court, Eastern
District of Louisiana, was filed against Liggett and others. The class
action complaint sought relief for a nationwide class of smokers based on
their alleged addiction to nicotine. The District Court granted plaintiffs'
motion for class certification. On May 23, 1996, the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals decertified the class and instructed the District Court to
F-39
<PAGE> 41
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
dismiss the class complaint. On March 12, 1996, the Company and Liggett
entered into an agreement, subject to court approval, to settle the CASTANO
class action tobacco litigation.
Under the CASTANO settlement agreement, upon final court approval of the
settlement, the CASTANO class would be entitled to receive up to 5% of
Liggett's pretax income (income before income taxes) each year (up to a
maximum of $50,000 per year) for the next twenty-five years, subject to
certain reductions provided for in the agreement, and a $5,000 payment
from Liggett if the Company or Liggett fails to consummate a merger or
similar transaction with another non-settling tobacco company defendant
within three years of the date of the settlement. The Company and Liggett
have the right to terminate the CASTANO settlement under certain
circumstances. On May 11, 1996, the CASTANO Plaintiffs Legal Committee
filed a motion with the District Court seeking preliminary approval of the
CASTANO settlement. On September 6, 1996, the CASTANO plaintiffs withdrew
the motion for approval of the CASTANO settlement.
On March 14, 1996, the Company, CASTANO Plaintiffs Legal Committee and the
CASTANO plaintiffs entered into a letter agreement. According to the terms
of the letter agreement, for the period ending nine months from the date of
Final Approval (if granted) of the CASTANO settlement or, if earlier, the
completion by the Company or Liggett of a combination with any defendant in
CASTANO, except Philip Morris, the CASTANO plaintiffs and their counsel
agree not to enter into any more favorable settlement agreement with any
CASTANO defendant which would reduce the terms of the CASTANO settlement
agreement. If the CASTANO plaintiffs or their counsel enter into any such
settlement during this period, they shall pay the Company $250,000 within
thirty days of the more favorable agreement and offer the Company and
Liggett the option to enter into a settlement on terms at least as
favorable as those included in such other settlement. The letter agreement
further provides that during the same time period, and if the CASTANO
settlement agreement has not been earlier terminated by the Company in
accordance with its terms, the Company and its affiliates will not enter
into any business transaction with any third party which would cause the
termination of the CASTANO settlement agreement. If the Company or its
affiliates enter into any such transaction, then the CASTANO plaintiffs
will be entitled to receive $250,000 within thirty days from the
transacting party.
In February 1995, an action entitled GRADY CARTER, ET AL. V. THE AMERICAN
TOBACCO COMPANY, ET AL., Superior Court for the State of Florida, Duval
County, was filed against Liggett and others. Plaintiff sought compensatory
damages, including, but not limited to, reimbursement for medical costs.
Both American Tobacco and Liggett were subsequently dismissed from this
action. On August 9, 1996, a jury returned a verdict against the remaining
defendant, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., in the amount of $750. Brown &
Williamson has filed a Notice of Appeal.
On May 23, 1994, an action entitled MOORE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, EX REL STATE
OF MISSISSIPPI V. THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, ET AL., Chancery Court of
Jackson County, Mississippi, was commenced against Liggett and others
seeking restitution and indemnity for medical payments and expenses
allegedly made or incurred for tobacco related illnesses. In May 1994, the
State of Florida enacted legislation, effective July 1, 1994, allowing
certain state authorities or entities to commence litigation seeking
recovery of certain Medicaid payments made on behalf of Medicaid recipients
as a result of diseases (including, but not limited to, diseases allegedly
caused by cigarette smoking) allegedly caused by liable third parties
(including, but not limited to, the tobacco industry). On February 21,
1995, the State of Florida commenced an action pursuant to this statutory
scheme. In addition to the foregoing, similar actions have been filed on
behalf of 20 states and several municipalities. The Mississippi, Florida
and Texas Medicaid recovery actions are scheduled for trial in 1997.
Legislation similar to that enacted in Florida has been introduced in the
Massachusetts and New Jersey legislatures.
In certain of the pending proceedings, state and local government entities
and others seek reimbursement for Medicaid and other health care
expenditures allegedly caused by tobacco products. The claims asserted in
these Medicaid recovery actions vary. All plaintiffs assert the equitable
claim that the tobacco industry was "unjustly enriched" by plaintiffs'
payment of health care costs allegedly attributable to smoking and seek
reimbursement of those costs. Other claims made by some but not all
plaintiffs include the equitable claim of indemnity, common law claims of
negligence, strict liability, breach of express and implied warranty,
violation of a voluntary undertaking or special duty, fraud, negligent
misrepresentation, conspiracy, public nuisance, claims under state and
federal statutes governing consumer fraud, antitrust, deceptive trade
practices and false advertising, and claims under the Federal Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act.
On March 15, 1996, the Company and Liggett entered into a settlement of
tobacco-related litigation with the Attorneys General of Florida,
Louisiana, Mississippi, West Virginia and Massachusetts. The settlement
with the Attorneys General releases the Company and Liggett from all
tobacco-related claims by these states including claims for Medicaid
reimbursement and concerning sales of cigarettes to minors. The settlement
provides that additional states which commence similar Attorney General
actions may agree to be bound by the settlement prior to six months from
the date thereof (subject to extension of such period by the settling
defendants). Certain of the terms of the settlement are summarized below.
Under the settlement, the states would share an initial payment by Liggett
of $5,000 ($1,000 of which was paid on March 22, 1996, with the balance
payable over nine years and indexed and adjusted for inflation), provided
that any unpaid amount will be due sixty days after either a default by
Liggett in its payment obligations under the settlement or a merger or
other similar transaction by the Company or Liggett with another defendant
in the lawsuits. In addition, Liggett will be required to pay the states a
F-40
<PAGE> 42
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
percentage of Liggett's pretax income (income before income taxes) each
year from the second through the twenty-fifth year. This annual percentage
is 2-1/2% of Liggett's pretax income, subject to increase to 7-1/2%
depending on the number of additional states joining the settlement. No
additional states have joined this settlement to date. All of Liggett's
payments are subject to certain reductions provided for in the agreement.
Liggett has also agreed to pay to the states $5,000 if the Company or
Liggett fails to consummate a merger or other similar transaction with
another defendant in the lawsuits within three years of the date of the
settlement.
Settlement funds received by the Attorneys General will be used to
reimburse the states' smoking-related healthcare costs. While neither
consenting to FDA jurisdiction nor waiving their objections thereto, the
Company and Liggett also have agreed to phase in compliance with certain of
the proposed interim FDA regulations on the same basis as provided in the
CASTANO settlement.
The Company and Liggett have the right to terminate the settlement with
respect to any state participating in the settlement if any of the
remaining defendants in the litigation succeed on the merits in that
state's Attorney General action. The Company and Liggett may also terminate
the settlement if they conclude that too many states have filed Attorney
General actions and have not resolved such cases as to the settling
defendants by joining in the settlement.
At December 31, 1995, the Company had accrued approximately $4,000 for the
present value of the fixed payments under the March 1996 Attorneys General
settlement, and no additional amounts have been accrued with respect to the
recent settlements discussed below. The Company cannot quantify the future
costs of the settlements at this time as the amount Liggett must pay is
based, in part, on future operating results. Possible future payments based
on a percentage of pretax income, and other contingent payments based on
the occurrence of a business combination will be expensed when considered
probable.
The Company understands that a grand jury investigation is being conducted
by the office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New
York regarding possible violations of criminal law relating to the
activities of The Council for Tobacco Research - USA, Inc. Liggett was
a sponsor of The Council for Tobacco Research - USA, Inc. at one time. The
Company is unable, at this time, to predict the outcome of this
investigation.
In March 1996, Liggett received a subpoena from a Federal grand jury
sitting in the Southern District of New York. Documents have been produced
in response to the subpoena. The Company understands that this
investigation has been transferred to the main office of the United States
Department of Justice. In addition, in May 1996, Liggett was served with a
subpoena by a grand jury sitting in the District of Columbia. Liggett is in
the process of responding to that subpoena. The Company and Liggett are
unable, at this time, to predict the outcome of these investigations.
The Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice
investigation into the United States tobacco industry activities in
connection with product development efforts regarding "fire-safe" or
self-extinguishing cigarettes has been concluded. No action by the
Department of Justice was taken.
Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and it is possible that some
of the aforementioned actions could be decided unfavorably against the
Company. An unfavorable outcome of a pending smoking and health case could
encourage the commencement of additional similar litigation. The Company is
not able to evaluate the effect of these developing matters on pending
litigation or the possible commencement of additional litigation.
The Company is unable to make a meaningful estimate of the amount or range
of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome of the cases pending
against the Company and Liggett. It is possible that the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows could
be materially adversely affected by an ultimate unfavorable outcome in any
of such pending litigation.
There are several other proceedings, lawsuits and claims pending against
the Company unrelated to product liability. Management is of the opinion
that the liabilities, if any, ultimately resulting from such
F-41
<PAGE> 43
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
other proceedings, lawsuits and claims should not materially affect
the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Subsequent Events:
On March 20, 1997, Liggett, together with the Company, entered into a
comprehensive settlement of tobacco litigation through parallel agreements
with the Attorneys General of 17 states and with a nationwide class of
individuals and entities that allege smoking-related claims. The Company
and Liggett have now obtained settlements with each of the 22 states that
have commenced suit against them. The settlements cover all smoking-related
claims, including both addiction-based and tobacco injury claims against
the Company and Liggett, brought by the 22 states and, upon court approval,
the nationwide class.
The settlement with the Attorneys General, which does not require court
approval, includes the states of Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York,
Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. The Company's and
Liggett's previous settlements on March 15, 1996 with the Attorneys General
of Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi and West Virginia remain
in full force and effect.
The settlement with the nationwide class covers all smoking-related claims.
On March 20, 1997, Liggett, the Company and plaintiffs filed the mandatory
class settlement agreement in an action entitled FLETCHER, ET AL. V BROOKE
GROUP LTD., ET AL., Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, where the
court granted preliminary approval and preliminary certification of the
class. Class members will be notified of the settlement and will have an
opportunity to appear at a later court hearing. Effectiveness of the
mandatory settlement is conditioned on final court approval of the
settlement after a fairness hearing. There can be no assurance as to
whether or when such court approval will be obtained. There are no opt out
provisions in this settlement, except for Medicaid claims by states that
are not party to the Attorneys General settlements.
Pursuant to the settlements, the Company and Liggett have agreed to
cooperate fully with the Attorneys General and the nationwide class in
their lawsuits against the tobacco industry. The Company and Liggett have
agreed to provide to these parties all relevant tobacco documents in their
possession, other than those subject to claims of joint defense privilege,
and to waive, subject to court order, certain attorney-client privileges
and work product protections regarding Liggett's smoking-related documents
to the extent Liggett and the Company can so waive these privileges and
protections. The Attorneys General and the nationwide class have agreed to
keep Liggett's documents under protective order and, subject to final court
approval, to limit their use to those actions brought by parties to the
settlement agreements. Those documents that may be subject to a joint
defense privilege with other tobacco companies will not be produced to the
Attorneys General or the nationwide class, but will be, pursuant to court
order, submitted to the appropriate court and placed under seal for
possible in camera review. Additionally, under similar protective
conditions, the Company and Liggett have agreed to offer their employees
for witness interviews and testimony at deposition and trial. Pursuant to
both settlement agreements, Liggett has also agreed to place an additional
warning on its cigarette packaging stating that "smoking is addictive" and
to issue a public statement, as requested by the Attorneys General.
Under the terms of the new settlement agreements, Liggett will pay on an
annual basis 25% of its pretax income for the next 25 years into a
settlement fund, commencing with the first full fiscal year starting after
the date of the agreements. Monies collected in the settlement fund will be
overseen by a court-appointed committee and utilized to compensate state
health care programs and settlement class members and to provide
counter-market advertising. Liggett has also agreed to phase-in
F-42
<PAGE> 44
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
compliance with certain proposed FDA regulations regarding smoking by
children and adolescents, including a prohibition on the use of cartoon
characters in tobacco advertising and limitations on the use of promotional
materials and distribution of sample packages where minors are present.
Under both settlement agreements, any other tobacco company defendant,
except Philip Morris, merging or combining with Liggett or the Company,
prior to the fourth anniversary of the settlement agreements, would receive
certain settlement benefits, including limitations on potential liability
and not having to post a bond to appeal any future adverse judgment. In
addition, within 120 days following such a combination, Liggett would be
required to pay the settlement fund $25 million. Both the Attorneys General
and the nationwide class have also agreed not to seek an injunction
preventing a defendant tobacco company combining with Liggett or the
Company from spinning off any of its affiliates which are not engaged in
the domestic tobacco business.
The Company and Liggett are also entitled to certain "most favored nation"
benefits not available to the other defendant tobacco companies. In
addition, in the event of a "global" tobacco settlement enacted through
Federal legislation or otherwise, the Attorneys General and tobacco
plaintiffs have agreed to use their "best efforts" to ensure that the
Company and Liggett's liability under such a plan should be no more onerous
than under these new settlements.
On March 20, 1997, RJR, Philip Morris, B & W and Lorillard obtained a
temporary restraining order from a North Carolina state court preventing,
the Company and Liggett and their agents, employees, directors, officers
and lawyers from turning over documents allegedly subject to the joint
defense privilege in connection with the settlements. On March 24, 1997,
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and
state courts in Mississippi and Illinois each issued orders enjoining these
four companies from interfering with Liggett's filing with the courts,
under seal, those documents.
Legislation and Regulation:
On August 28, 1996, the FDA filed in the Federal Register a Final Rule
classifying tobacco as a drug, asserting jurisdiction by the FDA over the
manufacture and marketing of tobacco products and imposing restrictions on
the sale, advertising and promotion of tobacco products. The FDA's stated
objective and focus for its initiative is to limit access to cigarettes by
minors by measures beyond the restrictions either mandated by existing
federal, state and local laws or voluntarily implemented by major
manufacturers in the industry. Litigation has been commenced in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina challenging
the legal authority of the FDA to assert such jurisdiction, as well as
challenging the constitutionality of the rules. A hearing on the tobacco
industry's motion for summary judgment in that case was held on February
10, 1997, and a decision by the Court is expected soon. The FDA's proposed
restrictions, some of which became effective as early as February 28, 1997,
purport to (i) limit access to tobacco products and (ii) limit advertising
and marketing. Management is unable to predict whether the Final Rule will
be upheld as enforceable against the industry. Management is also unable to
predict the effects of the proposed restrictions, if implemented, on
Liggett's operations, but such actions could have an unfavorable impact
thereon.
The Company and Liggett, while neither consenting to FDA jurisdiction nor
waiving their objections thereto, agreed to withdraw their objections and
opposition to the proposed rule making and to phase in compliance with
certain of the proposed interim FDA regulations. See discussions of the
Castano and Attorneys General settlements above.
In August 1996, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts enacted legislation
requiring tobacco companies to publish information regarding the
ingredients in cigarettes and other tobacco products sold in that state.
Regulations adopted pursuant to this legislation are scheduled to become
effective on July 1, 1997. On February 7, 1997, the United States District
Court for the District of
F-43
<PAGE> 45
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Massachusetts denied an attempt to block the new legislation on the ground
that it is preempted by federal law.
In 1993, the United States Congress amended the Agricultural Adjustment Act
of 1938 to require each United States cigarette manufacturer to use at
least 75% domestic tobacco in the aggregate of the cigarettes manufactured
by it in the United States, effective January 1, 1994, on an annualized
basis or pay a domestic marketing assessment ("DMA") based upon price
differentials between foreign and domestic tobacco and, under certain
circumstances, make purchases of domestic tobacco from the tobacco
stabilization cooperatives organized by the United States government.
After an audit, the USDA informed Liggett that it did not satisfy the 75%
domestic tobacco usage requirement for 1994 and was subject to a DMA of
approximately $5,500. Liggett has agreed to pay this assessment in
quarterly installments with interest over a five-year period, and $4,900
was accrued for the assessment in 1995. Since the levels of domestic
tobacco inventories on hand at the tobacco stabilization organizations are
below reserve stock levels, Liggett was not obligated to make purchases
of domestic tobacco from the tobacco stabilization cooperatives.
On September 13, 1995, the President of the United States issued
Presidential Proclamation 6821, which established a tariff rate quota
("TRQ") on certain imported tobacco, imposing extremely high tariffs on
imports of flue-cured and burley tobacco in excess of certain levels which
vary from country to country. Oriental tobacco is exempt from the quota as
well as all tobacco originating from Canada, Mexico or Israel. Management
believes that the TRQ levels are sufficiently high to allow Liggett to
operate without material disruption to its business. In addition the
Presidential Proclamation served to limit the application of the DMA to
only those activities occurring in calendar year 1994.
On February 20, 1996, the United States Trade representative issued an
"advance notice of rule making" concerning how tobaccos imported under the
TRQ should be allocated. Currently, tobacco imported under the TRQ is
allocated on a "first-come, first-served" basis, meaning that entry is
allowed on an open basis to those first requesting entry in the quota year.
Others in the cigarette industry have suggested an "end-user licensing"
system under which the right to import tobacco under the quota would be
initially assigned on the basis of domestic market share. Such an approach,
if adopted, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
In April 1994, the United States Occupational Safety and Health
Administration ("OSHA") issued a proposed rule that could ultimately ban
smoking in the workplace. Hearings were completed during 1995. OSHA has not
yet issued a final rule or a proposed revised rule. While the Company
cannot predict the outcome, some form of federal regulation of smoking in
workplaces may result.
In January 1993, the EPA released a report on the respiratory effect of ETS
which concludes that ETS is a known human lung carcinogen in adults, and in
children causes increased respiratory tract disease and middle ear
disorders and increases the severity and frequency of asthma. In June 1993,
the two largest of the major domestic cigarette manufacturers, together
with other segments of the tobacco and distribution industries, commenced a
lawsuit against the EPA seeking a determination that the EPA did not have
the statutory authority to regulate ETS, and that given the current body of
scientific evidence and the EPA's failure to follow its own guidelines in
making the determination, the EPA's classification of ETS was arbitrary and
capricious. Whatever the outcome of this litigation, issuance of the report
may encourage efforts to limit smoking in public areas.
Liggett has been involved in certain environmental proceedings, none of
which, either individually or in the aggregate, rise to the level of
materiality. Liggett's current operations are
F-44
<PAGE> 46
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
conducted in accordance with all environmental laws and regulations.
Management is unaware of any material environmental conditions affecting
its existing facilities. Compliance with federal, state and local
provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or
otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, have not had a
material effect on the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive
position of Liggett.
In addition to the foregoing, there have been a number of other restrictive
regulatory actions, adverse political decisions and other unfavorable
developments concerning cigarette smoking and the tobacco industry, the
effects of which, at this time the Company is not able to evaluate.
Other Matters:
As a conclusion to the litigation commenced by a group of Contingent Value
Right ("CVR") Holders on September 20, 1993, the Delaware Court of Chancery
approved a settlement at a hearing conducted on June 4, 1996. The
settlement became final and nonappealable on or about July 8, 1996.
Distributions to the Company and to CVR Holders, pursuant to the
settlement, have been substantially completed. Under the terms of the
settlement, both the Company and the plaintiff CVR Holders may pursue
claims, in certain circumstances, against the CVR trustee. In connection
with the settlement, the Company recognized a gain of $2,263 during the
third quarter 1996.
At December 31, 1996, there were several other proceedings, lawsuits and
claims pending against the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company is of
the opinion that the liabilities, if any, ultimately resulting from such
other proceedings, lawsuits and claims should not materially affect its
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Subsequent Events:
In June 1993, the Company obtained expropriation and forced abandonment
insurance coverage for its investment in its Ducat Place I real estate
project in Moscow, Russia. Shortly thereafter, the Company submitted a
Notice of Loss to the insurer, under and pursuant to the policy. The
insurer denied the claim and, in July 1994, arbitration proceedings were
commenced in the United Kingdom. In January 1997, the Company recognized a
gain of $4,125 in settlement of the dispute.
17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On January 5, 1994, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer and controlling stockholder (the "Chairman") repaid his principal
indebtedness of $14,692 and that of certain of his affiliates in the total
amount of $15,695 with the use of dividends paid on December 31, 1993 on
Series G Preferred Stock. (Refer to Note 14.) On March 21, 1994, the
Chairman repaid all interest due on the various debts in the amount of
$1,163 and accordingly, the stock collateralizing the loans was released.
Effective July 1, 1990, a former executive transferred all of his equity in
the Company to the Chairman and resigned from substantially all of his
positions with the Company and its affiliates. In consideration for this
transfer, a partnership (the "Partnership") controlled by the Chairman
agreed, among other things, to make certain payments to the Company on
account of the former executive's outstanding indebtedness of $8,677
(deducted from equity). In connection with this transaction, the
Partnership had pledged 1,681,715 of the shares it held of the Company's
common stock to secure this non-recourse obligation, except as to the
pledged shares. In May 1994, the Partnership paid
F-45
<PAGE> 47
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
$3,200 in partial satisfaction of the obligation. In consideration thereof,
the Company released 1,281,715 of the pledged shares. On March 7, 1997, the
Partnership transferred to the Company the remaining 400,000 pledged shares
in final satisfaction of the obligation.
In conjunction with the transfer of 607,889 shares of the Company's common
stock in 1992, the former Vice Chairman of the Company was granted a
warrant (the "Warrant") to purchase 607,889 shares of common stock for an
exercise price of $7.60 a share, subsequently reduced to $0.10 per share as
a result of the SkyBox distribution. The Warrant was exercised in November
1994. The former Vice Chairman has served on the Board of Directors of New
Valley since 1990 and has been a consultant to Liggett in 1996 for which he
received $220 of consulting fees.
On December 16, 1996, the Company entered into a Stock Option Agreement
relating to 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock with a
consultant who serves as a director and President of New Valley. In
addition, the Company granted the same consultant 500,000 shares of
restricted common stock in 1994 and options to purchase 500,000 shares in
1995. (Refer to Note 15.) During 1996, the consultant received $480 of
consulting fees from the Company and a subsidiary.
An outside director of the Company is a stockholder of and serves as the
secretary and treasurer of a registered broker-dealer that has performed
services for the Company and its affiliates since before December 31, 1993.
The broker-dealer received brokerage commissions and other income of
approximately $317, $584 and $121 from the Company and/or its affiliates
during 1996, 1995, and 1994, respectively. The broker-dealer, in the
ordinary course of its business, engages in brokerage activities with New
Valley's broker-dealer subsidiary on customary terms. In connection with
the acquisition of certain office buildings by New Valley on January 10,
1996, this director received a commission of $220 from the seller.
During 1995, the Company and New Valley entered into an expense sharing
agreement whereby certain lease, legal and administrative expenses are
allocated to the entity incurring the expense. Expense reimbursements
amounted to $462 and $571 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
During 1996, the Company and BGLS entered into a court-approved Stipulation
and Agreement (the "Settlement") with New Valley relating to the Company's
and BGLS' application under the Federal Bankruptcy Code for reimbursement
of legal fees and expenses incurred by them in connection with New Valley's
bankruptcy reorganization proceedings. Pursuant to the Settlement, New
Valley reimbursed the Company and BGLS $655 for such legal fees and
expenses. The terms of the Settlement were substantially similar to the
terms of previous settlements between New Valley and other applicants who
had sought reimbursement of reorganization-related legal fees and expenses.
On December 18, 1996, New Valley loaned BGLS $990 under a short-term
promissory note due January 31, 1997 and bearing interest at 14%. On
January 2, 1997, New Valley loaned BGLS an additional $975 under another
short-term promissory note due January 31, 1997 and bearing interest at
14%. Both loans including interest were repaid on January 31, 1997. At
December 31, 1996, the loan and accrued interest thereon of $996 was
included in current liabilities as notes payable.
In connection with their agreement to serve as the Company's nominees at
RJR Nabisco's Annual Meeting, two directors of New Valley were each paid
$30 by the Company during the fourth quarter of 1995. In addition, the
Company also entered into an agreement with each of the Company nominees
whereby it has agreed to indemnify such nominees against certain
liabilities arising out of the solicitation of proxies in support of the
nominees' election at the annual meeting. As discussed in
F-46
<PAGE> 48
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (Continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Note 3, the Company has entered into certain other agreements with New
Valley in connection with RJR Nabisco.
Subsequent Events:
On January 31, 1997, New Valley entered into a stock purchase agreement
with BOL pursuant to which New Valley acquired 10,483 shares of BML common
stock (99.1%) for a purchase price of $55,000, consisting of $21,500 in
cash and a $33,500 promissory note with an interest rate of 9%. (Refer to
Note 4.)
18. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company's major operations are in tobacco products, principally
cigarettes, and real estate development. The tobacco segment operates in
the United States and in Russia; real estate activities are conducted in
Russia. Total assets of the foreign real estate and tobacco operations
included in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 1996 and 1995
were approximately $72,296 and $45,400, respectively. (Refer to Note 4.)
Industry Segment:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Real Corporate
1996 Tobacco Estate and Others Consolidated
---- ------- ------ ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.................. $447,522 $ 2,675 $ 2,459 $452,656
Operating income........... 4,805 99 (8,831) (3,927)
Identifiable assets........ 114,648 55,012 8,017 177,677
Capital expenditures....... 8,861 25,318 62 34,241
Depreciation and
amortization............. 8,185 253 381 8,819
Real Corporate
1995 Tobacco Estate and Others Consolidated
---- ------- ------ ---------- ------------
Net sales.................. $455,666 $ 5,793 $461,459
Operating income........... 16,725 $ (1,990) (6,675) 8,060
Identifiable assets........ 123,144 31,149 71,327 225,620
Capital expenditures....... 1,104 7,229 472 8,805
Depreciation and
amortization............. 7,972 1,104 9,076
</TABLE>
F-47
<PAGE> 49
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Geographic Area:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
United
1996 States Russia Consolidated
---- -------- ------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.............................. $403,521 $49,135 $452,656
Operating income....................... 6,045 (9,972) (3,927)
Identifiable assets.................... 105,381 72,296 177,677
</TABLE>
19. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash
Flows," supplemental cash flow information is disclosed below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
I. Cash paid during the period for:
Interest........................................ $57,362 $60,158 $39,429
Income taxes, net of refunds.................... 582 1,735 605
II. Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Dividends payable............................... $ 1,387 $ 131
Issuance and exchange of long-term debt......... 114,888
Distribution of MAI to stockholders............. $27,085
Series G dividend............................... 3,200
Shareholder settlement.......................... 6,250
Transfer of pension liability to SkyBox......... 4,305
Exchange of Series 2 Senior Secured Notes
for Series A Notes............................ 99,154
Exchange of 14.50% Subordinated Debentures
for Series B Notes............................ 125,495
Issuance of Series A Notes for options.......... 822
Exchange of Series A Notes for Series B Notes... 99,976
Issuance of promissory notes for shares
of Liggett-Ducat.............................. 1,643
</TABLE>
20. STANDSTILL AND CONSENT AGREEMENT; CURRENT REQUIREMENTS
The Company has engaged in negotiations with the principal holders of more
than 83% of the BGLS Notes to restructure certain of its debt service
requirements. A standstill and consent agreement was reached among the
Company, BGLS and the principal holders on August 28, 1997, as subsequently
amended, whereby each of the principal holders of the BGLS Notes waived the
right to receive on August 29, 1997 its pro rata share of the July 31, 1997
interest payment (in total, $15,340). Pending completion of the
negotiations with the principal holders, such holders have agreed that they
will be entitled to receive their portion of the July 31, 1997 interest
payment only after giving BGLS 20 days' notice but, in any event, by
February 6, 1998. The Company has recently completed a third party equity
financing. While all liquidity requirements have not been met, management
currently believes that new debt and equity financing and a successful
restructuring of certain of its debt service requirements along with cash
provided from operations and distributions from New Valley, will provide
the Company with sufficient liquidity for 1998.
F-48
<PAGE> 50
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) - (continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------
21. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly data for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996
----------------- ---------------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <S>
Revenues........................... $122,292 $114,635 $125,213 $90,516
Gross profit....................... 55,590 56,274 61,691 43,468
Loss from continuing operations.... (22,732) (13,737) (10,672) (17,777)
Income from discontinued
operations....................... 2,385
Net loss applicable to
common shares.................... (20,347) (13,737) (10,672) (15,995)
Per share data:
Loss from continuing operations.... $(1.23) $(0.74) $(0.58) $(0.86)
====== ====== ====== ======
Income from discontinued
operations....................... $ 0.13 $ $ $
====== ======== ======= =======
Net loss applicable to
common shares.................... $(1.10) $(0.74) $(0.58) $(0.86)
====== ======== ======= =======
SHARE PRICES:
High............................. 5 3/4 6 1/4 8 7/8 10 1/8
Low.............................. 4 1/4 4 5/8 5 5/8 7 3/4
December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31,
1995 1995 1995 1995
----------------- ---------------- ----------------- ----------------
Revenues........................... $119,741 $124,100 $122,328 $95,290
Gross profit....................... 62,320 69,474 64,566 48,912
Loss from continuing operations.... (17,671) (1,124) (13,639) (12,910)
Income from discontinued
operations....................... 5,231 98 1,114 14,786
Extraordinary items................ (9,810)
Net (loss) income applicable to
common shares.................... (22,269) 1,772 (1,571) 4,945
Per share data:
(Loss) income from continuing
operations....................... $(0.97) $ 0.09 $(0.15) $(0.53)
====== ====== ====== ======
Income from discontinued
operations....................... $ 0.29 $ 0.01 $ 0.06 $ 0.80
====== ====== ====== ======
Extraordinary items................ $(0.54) $ $ $
====== ====== ====== ======
Net (loss) income applicable to
common shares.................... $(1.22) $ 0.10 $(0.09) $ 0.27
====== ====== ====== ======
SHARE PRICES:
High............................. 9 7/8 11 3/8 5 1/2 4 1/4
Low.............................. 6 5/8 4 3/8 3 1/8 3 15/64
</TABLE>
F-49
<PAGE> 51
BROOKE GROUP LTD.
BGLS INC.
SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(Dollars in Thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additions
------------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged to Balance
Beginning Costs and Other at End
Description of Period Expenses Accounts Deductions of Period
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Allowances for:
Doubtful accounts .................... $ 921 $ 903 $ 1,074 $ 750
Cash discounts ....................... 615 13,929 14,014 530
Sales returns ........................ 5,000 5,000
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Total ............................. $ 6,536 $14,832 $ $ 15,088 $ 6,280
======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Provision for inventory obsolescence ....... $ 2,641 $ 1,341 $ $ 764 $ 3,218
======== ======== ======== ======== =======
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
Allowances for:
Doubtful accounts .................... $ 249 $ 260 $ 692(b) $ 280 $ 921
Cash discounts ....................... 720 14,579 14,684 615
Sales returns ........................ 5,800 1,030 (800)(a) 1,030 5,000
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total ............................. $ 6,769 $15,869 $ (108) $15,994 $ 6,536
======== ======= ======= ======= =======
Provision for inventory obsolescence ....... $ 1,369 $ 1,072 $ 630(b) $ 430 $ 2,641
======== ======= ======= ======= =======
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994
Allowances for:
Doubtful accounts .................... $ 235 $ 21 $ 7 $ 249
Cash discounts ....................... 745 12,337 12,362 720
Sales returns ........................ 6,300 $ 2,800(a) 3,300 5,800
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Total ............................. $ 7,280 $ 12,358 $ 2,800 $15,669 $ 6,769
======== ======== ======== ======= =======
Provision for inventory obsolescence ....... $ 1,418 $ 520 $ $ 569 $ 1,369
======== ======== ======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
(a) Charged to net sales.
(b) Amounts include impact of consolidating Liggett-Ducat.
F-50
<PAGE> 52
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and the
Shareholders of New Valley Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of New Valley
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. We have also audited the
financial statement schedule of New Valley Corporation (Schedule III - Real
Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 1996) listed in the index
on page 26 of this Form 10-K. These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of
Thinking Machines Corporation, a consolidated subsidiary, which
statements reflect total assets constituting 3% of consolidated total assets at
December 31, 1996 and a net loss (net of minority interest therein) constituting
90% of the consolidated net loss for the year ended December 31, 1996.
Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished
to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for
Thinking Machines Corporation, are based solely on the report of the other
auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors,
the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of New Valley Corporation
and subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information required to be included therein.
/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
--------------------------------------
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Miami, Florida
March 24, 1997
F-51
<PAGE> 53
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and the
Shareholders of New Valley Corporation
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 1994, appearing under Item 14(a)(1) and (2) present fairly, in all
material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of New Valley
Corporation and its subsidiaries (the "Company"), for the year, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our
audit of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
--------------------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Morristown, New Jersey
March 24, 1995
F-52
<PAGE> 54
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 57,282 $ 51,742
Investment securities available for sale.................. 61,454 210,315
Trading securities owned.................................. 29,761 31,211
Restricted assets......................................... 2,080 22,919
Receivable from clearing brokers.......................... 23,870 13,752
Other current assets...................................... 9,273 3,546
-------- --------
Total current assets.............................. 183,720 333,485
-------- --------
Investment in real estate................................... 179,571 --
Investment securities available for sale.................... 2,716 517
Restricted assets........................................... 6,766 15,086
Long-term investments, net.................................. 13,270 29,512
Other assets................................................ 20,497 7,222
-------- --------
Total assets...................................... $406,540 $385,822
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.................. $ 44,888 $ 27,712
Prepetition claims and restructuring accruals............. 15,526 33,392
Income taxes.............................................. 18,243 20,283
Securities sold, not yet purchased........................ 17,143 13,047
Margin loan payable....................................... -- 75,119
Current portion of notes payable and long-term
obligations............................................ 2,310 8,367
-------- --------
Total current liabilities......................... 98,110 177,920
-------- --------
Notes payable............................................... 157,941 --
Other long-term liabilities................................. 12,282 11,967
Redeemable preferred shares................................. 210,571 226,396
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity (deficit):
Cumulative preferred shares; liquidation preference of
$69,769, dividends in arrears: 1996 -- $115,944;
1995 -- $95,118........................................ 279 279
Common Shares, $.01 par value; 850,000,000 shares
authorized; 9,577,624 and 191,551,586 shares
outstanding............................................ 96 1,916
Additional paid-in capital................................ 644,789 679,058
Accumulated deficit....................................... (721,854) (714,364)
Unearned compensation on stock options.................... (731) --
Unrealized gain on investment securities, net of taxes of
$294 in 1995........................................... 5,057 2,650
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit).............. (72,364) (30,461)
-------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
(deficit)....................................... $406,540 $385,822
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-53
<PAGE> 55
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Principal transactions, net............................... $ 28,344 $ 18,237
Commissions............................................... 17,755 9,888
Real estate leasing....................................... 23,559 --
Interest and dividends.................................... 16,951 21,047 $ 7,104
Other income.............................................. 25,345 18,558 3,277
---------- ---------- -----------
Total revenues..................................... 111,954 67,730 10,381
---------- ---------- -----------
Costs and expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits........................ 60,884 30,994 219
Interest.................................................. 17,760 2,102 643
Provision for (recovery of) restructuring charges......... (9,706) (2,044) 22,734
Write-down of long-term investments (Note 8).............. 1,001 11,790 --
Other expenses............................................ 58,270 23,222 2,550
---------- ---------- -----------
Total costs and expenses........................... 128,209 66,064 26,146
---------- ---------- -----------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes, minority interests and extraordinary item.......... (16,255) 1,666 (15,765)
Income tax provision (benefit).............................. 300 292 (500)
Minority interests in loss from continuing operations of
consolidated subsidiary................................... 3,339 -- --
---------- ---------- -----------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
extraordinary item........................................ (13,216) 1,374 (15,265)
Discontinued operations (Note 4):
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
minority interests of $2,404 in 1996, and income taxes
of $480 in 1995 and $5,500 in 1994...................... (3,818) 4,315 79,625
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of
minority interests of $1,502 in 1996, and income taxes
of $1,400 in 1995 and $52,000 in 1994................... 9,544 12,558 1,056,081
---------- ---------- -----------
Income from discontinued operations................ 5,726 16,873 1,135,706
---------- ---------- -----------
Income (loss) before extraordinary item..................... (7,490) 18,247 1,120,441
Extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt, net of income
taxes of $3,475 (Note 17)................................. -- -- (110,500)
---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss)........................................... (7,490) 18,247 1,009,941
Dividend requirements on preferred shares................... (61,949) (72,303) (80,037)
Excess of carrying value of redeemable preferred shares over
cost of shares purchased.................................. 4,279 40,342 --
---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss) applicable to Common Shares...... $ (65,160) $ (13,714) $ 929,904
========== ========== ===========
Income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations before extraordinary item........... $ (7.40) $ (3.20) $ (10.12)
Discontinued operations................................... .60 1.77 120.63
---------- ---------- -----------
Before extraordinary item................................. (6.80) (1.43) 110.51
Extraordinary item........................................ -- -- (11.74)
---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss).................................. $ (6.80) $ (1.43) $ 98.77
========== ========== ===========
Number of shares used in computation........................ 9,578,000 9,554,000 9,415,000
========== ========== ===========
Income (loss) per common share assuming full dilution:
Continuing operations before extraordinary item........... $ (7.40) $ (3.20) $ (9.00)
Discontinued operations................................... .60 1.77 107.36
---------- ---------- -----------
Before extraordinary item................................. (6.80) (1.43) 98.36
Extraordinary item........................................ -- -- (10.45)
---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss).................................. $ (6.80) $ (1.43) $ 87.91
========== ========== ===========
Number of shares used in computation........................ 9,578,000 9,554,000 10,578,000
========== ========== ===========
Supplemental information:
Additional interest expense, absent the Chapter 11
filing.................................................. $ 2,314 $ 46,927
========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-54
<PAGE> 56
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNEARNED
CLASS B ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
PREFERRED COMMON PAID-IN ACCUMULATED ON STOCK UNREALIZED
SHARES SHARES CAPITAL DEFICIT OPTIONS GAINS
--------- ------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance December 31, 1993.................... $279 $1,881 $755,521 $(1,742,552)
Net income................................. 1,009,941
Undeclared dividends and accretion on
redeemable preferred shares.............. (63,635)
Conversion of preferred shares.............
Exercise of stock options.................. 6 115
---- ------- -------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1994................... 279 1,887 692,001 (732,611)
Net income................................. 18,247
Undeclared dividends and accretion on
redeemable preferred shares.............. (53,821)
Purchase of redeemable preferred shares.... 40,342
Exercise of stock options.................. 29 536
Unrealized gain on investment securities,
net of taxes............................. $2,650
---- ------- -------- ----------- ------
Balance, December 31, 1995................... 279 1,916 679,058 (714,364) 2,650
Net loss................................... (7,490)
Undeclared dividends and accretion on
redeemable preferred shares.............. (41,123)
Purchase of redeemable preferred shares.... 4,279
Effect of 1-for-20 reverse stock split..... (1,820) 1,820
Issuance of stock options.................. 755 $(755)
Compensation expense on stock option
grants................................... 24
Unrealized gain on investment securities... 2,407
---- ------- -------- ----------- ----- ------
Balance, December 31, 1996................... $279 $ 96 $644,789 $ (721,854) $(731) $5,057
==== ======= ======== =========== ===== ======
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-55
<PAGE> 57
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)......................................... $ (7,490) $ 18,247 $ 1,009,941
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used for operating activities:
Gain on disposal of business............................ (9,544) (12,558) (1,056,081)
Loss (income) from discontinued operations.............. 3,818 (4,315) (79,625)
Depreciation and amortization........................... 4,757 608 --
Provision for loss on long-term investments............. 1,001 11,790 --
Reversal of restructuring accruals...................... (9,706) (2,044) (318)
Extraordinary loss...................................... -- -- 110,500
Financial restructuring costs........................... -- -- 23,052
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisition:
Decrease (increase) in receivables and other assets... (16,069) 11,684 (7,571)
Decrease in income taxes payable and deferred taxes... (2,040) (32,517) --
Increase (decrease) in securities sold not yet
purchased............................................ 4,096 (9,359) --
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities.......................................... 6,437 5,223 (16,896)
--------- --------- -----------
Net cash used for continuing operations............. (24,740) (13,241) (16,998)
Net cash provided from discontinued operations...... 2,041 6,105 139,410
--------- --------- -----------
Net cash used for operating activities.............. (22,699) (7,136) 122,412
--------- --------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sale or maturity of investment securities................. 160,088 250,129 --
Purchase of investment securities......................... (12,825) (458,017) --
Sale or liquidation of long-term investments.............. 18,292 36,109 --
Purchase of long-term investments......................... (3,051) (77,411) --
Decrease (increase) in restricted assets.................. 29,159 341,634 (367,378)
Purchase of furniture and equipment....................... (5,240) -- --
Purchase of and additions to real estate.................. (24,496) -- --
Payment of prepetition claims and restructuring
accruals................................................ (8,160) (584,397) --
Payment for acquisitions, net of cash acquired............ 1,915 (25,750) --
Collection of contract receivable......................... -- 300,000 --
Net proceeds from disposal of business.................... 10,174 17,540 467,822
--------- --------- -----------
Net cash provided from (used for) investing activities...... 165,856 (200,163) 100,444
--------- --------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of preferred dividends............................ (41,419) (132,162)
Purchase of redeemable preferred shares................... (10,530) (47,761)
Increase (decrease) in margin loan payable................ (75,119) 75,119
Payment of long-term notes and other liabilities.......... (10,549) (12,890)
Exercise of stock options................................. -- 565
--------- ---------
Net cash used for financing activities...................... (137,617) (117,129)
--------- ---------
Expenses of financial restructuring......................... -- -- (23,052)
-----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents........ 5,540 (324,428) 199,804
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year................ 51,742 376,170 176,366
--------- --------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year...................... $ 57,282 $ 51,742 $ 376,170
========= ========= ===========
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest............................................ $ 17,482 $ 2,105 $ 476
Income taxes........................................ 2,341 33,662 882
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Contract receivable................................. 300,000
Pension liability discharge......................... 245,000
Detail of acquisitions:
Fair value of assets acquired............................. $ 27,301 $ 59,066
Liabilities assumed....................................... 16,701 32,316
--------- ---------
Cash paid................................................. 10,600 26,750
Less cash acquired........................................ 12,515 1,000
--------- ---------
Net cash paid (received) for acquisition.................. $ (1,915) $ 25,750
========= =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-56
<PAGE> 58
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of New Valley
Corporation and its majority owned subsidiaries (the "Company"). All significant
intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Certain amounts in the 1994 and 1995 financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 1996 presentation.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Company and its subsidiaries are engaged in the investment banking and
brokerage business, in the ownership and management of commercial real estate,
and in the acquisition of operating companies.
REORGANIZATION
On November 15, 1991, an involuntary petition under Chapter 11 of Title 11
of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") was commenced against the
Company in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey
(the "Bankruptcy Court"). On March 31, 1993, the Company consented to the entry
of an order for relief placing it under the protection of Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code.
On November 1, 1994, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the
First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, as amended (the "Joint
Plan"). The terms of the Joint Plan provided for, among other things, the sale
of Western Union Financial Services Company, Inc. ("FSI"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, and certain other Company assets related to FSI's
money transfer business, payment in cash of all allowed claims, payment of
postpetition interest in the amount of $178,000 to certain creditors, a $50 per
share cash dividend to the holders of the Company's $15.00 Class A Increasing
Rate Cumulative Senior Preferred Shares ($100 Liquidation Value), $.01 par value
per share (the "Class A Senior Preferred Shares"), a tender offer by the Company
for up to 150,000 shares of the Class A Senior Preferred Shares, at a price of
$80 per share, and the reinstatement of all of the Company's equity interests.
On November 15, 1994, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
October 20, 1994, as amended (the "Purchase Agreement"), by and between the
Company and First Financial Management Corporation ("FFMC"), FFMC purchased all
of the common stock of FSI and other assets relating to FSI's money transfer
business for $1,193,000 (the "Purchase Price"). The Purchase Price consisted of
$593,000 in cash, $300,000 representing the assumption of the Western Union
Pension Plan obligation, and $300,000 paid on January 13, 1995 for certain
intangible assets of FSI. The Purchase Agreement contained various terms and
conditions, including the escrow of $45,000 of the Purchase Price, a put option
by the Company to sell to FFMC, and a call option by FFMC to purchase, Western
Union Data Services Company, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
engaged in the messaging service business (the "Messaging Services Business"),
for $20,000, exercisable during the first quarter of 1996, and various services
agreements between the Company and FFMC.
On January 18, 1995, the effective date of the Joint Plan, the Company paid
approximately $550,000 on account of allowed prepetition claims and emerged from
bankruptcy. At December 31, 1996, the Company had accrued $15,526 for unsettled
prepetition claims and restructuring accruals (see Note 17).
On October 31, 1995, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of
the assets (exclusive of certain contracts), and conveyed substantially all of
the liabilities of the Messaging Services Business to FFMC for $20,000, which
consisted of $17,540 in cash and $2,460 in cancellation of intercompany
F-57
<PAGE> 59
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
indebtedness. The sale of the Messaging Services Business was effective as of
October 1, 1995, and the Company recognized a gain on the sale of such business
of $12,558, net of income taxes of $1,400.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reincorporation and Reverse Stock Split. On July 29, 1996, the Company
completed its reincorporation from the State of New York to the State of
Delaware and effected a one-for-twenty reverse stock split of the Company's
Common Shares. In connection with the reverse stock split, all per share data
have been restated to reflect retroactively the reverse stock split.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid
financial instruments with an original maturity of less than three months to be
cash equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Investments in securities and
securities sold, not yet purchased traded on a national securities exchange or
listed on NASDAQ are valued at the last reported sales prices of the reporting
period. Futures contracts are valued at their last reported sales price.
Investments in securities, principally warrants, which have exercise or holding
period restrictions, are valued at fair value as determined by the Company's
management based on the intrinsic value of the warrants discounted for such
restrictions. For cash and cash equivalents, restricted assets, receivable from
clearing brokers, and short-term loan, the carrying value of these amounts is a
reasonable estimate of their fair value. The fair value of long-term debt,
including current portion, is estimated based on current rates offered to the
Company for debt of the same maturities. The fair value of the Company's
redeemable preferred shares is based on their last reported sales price.
Investment Securities. The Company follows the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities", which requires certain investments
in debt and marketable equity securities be classified as either trading,
available for sale, or held to maturity. Trading securities are carried at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses included in income. Investments
classified as available for sale are carried at fair value, with net unrealized
gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders' equity
(deficit). Debt securities classified as held to maturity are carried at
amortized cost. Realized gains and losses are included in other income, except
for those relating to the Company's broker-dealer subsidiary which are included
in principal transactions revenues. The cost of securities sold is determined
based on average cost.
Restricted Assets. Restricted assets at December 31, 1996 consisted
primarily of $5,266 pledged as collateral for a $5,000 letter of credit which is
used as collateral for a long-term lease of commercial office space, and $3,275
pledged as collateral for a letter of credit which is used as collateral for an
insurance policy. At December 31, 1995, the current and noncurrent portions of
restricted assets consisted primarily of $28,200 held in escrow pursuant to the
sale of FSI to FFMC, which have been classified based on the terms of the
Purchase Agreement and the anticipated release of the escrow. Restricted assets
consisted of investments in U.S. government bonds. In 1996, the Company reached
an agreement with FFMC whereby FFMC released all of the remaining restricted
assets held in escrow. In addition, the agreement required the Company to pay
FFMC $7,000 in connection with the termination of the various service agreements
the Company had with FFMC. The Company recognized a gain on the termination of
these service agreements of $1,285, which amount is included in other income.
F-58
<PAGE> 60
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Property and Equipment. Buildings are depreciated over periods
approximating 40 years, the estimated useful life, using the straight-line
method (see Note 7). Furniture and equipment (including equipment subject to
capital leases) is depreciated over the estimated useful lives, using the
straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives or the lease term, if shorter. The cost
and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated upon retirement or other
disposition and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. As of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements had
a carrying value of $9,225 and $1,032, respectively. Depreciation and
amortization expense was $4,757, $608 and $9,000 in 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for 1994 is included in
discontinued operations.
Income Taxes. Under SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", deferred
taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of assets
and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
recognized for tax purposes as well as tax credit carryforwards and loss
carryforwards. These deferred taxes are measured by applying currently enacted
tax rates. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets when it is deemed
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized.
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased. Securities sold, not yet purchased
represent obligations of the Company to deliver a specified security at a
contracted price and thereby create a liability to repurchase the security in
the market at prevailing prices. Accordingly, these transactions involve, to
varying degrees, elements of market risk, as the Company's ultimate obligation
to satisfy the sale of securities sold, not yet purchased may exceed the amount
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet.
Real Estate Leasing Revenues. The real estate properties are being leased
to tenants under operating leases. Base rental revenue is generally recognized
on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The lease agreements for
certain properties contain provisions which provide for reimbursement of real
estate taxes and operating expenses over base year amounts, and in certain cases
as fixed increases in rent. In addition, the lease agreements for certain
tenants provide additional rentals based upon revenues in excess of base
amounts, and such amounts are accrued as earned. The future minimum rents on
non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 1996 are $18,620, $18,492,
$14,827, $12,073, $9,319 for the years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
respectively, and $38,246 for subsequent years.
Income (Loss) Per Common Share. Net income (loss) per common share is
based on the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding. Net income
(loss) per common share represents net income (loss) after dividend requirements
on redeemable and non-redeemable preferred shares (undeclared) and any
adjustment for the difference between excess of carrying value of redeemable
preferred shares over the cost of the shares purchased. Net income (loss) per
common share assuming full dilution is based on the weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding plus the additional common shares resulting from the
conversion of convertible preferred shares if such conversion was dilutive.
Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets. An impairment loss is recognized
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Beginning in 1995 with the adoption of SFAS No.
121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of", assets are grouped and evaluated at the lowest level
for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the
cash flows of other groups of assets. The Company considers historical
performance and future estimated results in its evaluation of potential
impairment and then compares the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated
future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset. If the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows,
the Company measures the amount of the impairment by comparing the carrying
amount of the asset to its fair value. The estimation of fair value is generally
measured by discounting expected future cash flows at the rate the Company
utilizes to evaluate potential investments. The Company estimates fair value
based on the best information available making whatever estimates, judgments and
projections are considered necessary.
F-59
<PAGE> 61
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
New Accounting Pronouncements. In February 1997, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board issued SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share". SFAS 128 specifies
new standards designed to improve the earnings per share ("EPS") information
provided in financial statements by simplifying the existing computational
guidelines, revising the disclosure requirements, and increasing the
comparability of EPS data on an international basis. Some of the changes made to
simplify the EPS computations include: (a) eliminating the presentation of
primary EPS and replacing it with basic EPS, with the principal difference being
that common stock equivalents (CSEs) are not considered in computing basic EPS,
(b) eliminating the modified treasury stock method and the three percent
materiality provision, and (c) revising the contingent share provisions and the
supplemental EPS data requirements. SFAS 128 also makes a number of changes to
existing disclosure requirements. SFAS 128 is effective for financial statements
issued for periods ending after December 15, 1997, including interim periods.
The Company has not yet determined the impact of the implementation of SFAS 128.
3. ACQUISITIONS
On May 31, 1995, the Company consummated its acquisition of Ladenburg,
Thalmann & Co. Inc. ("Ladenburg"), a registered broker-dealer and investment
bank, for $25,750, net of cash acquired. The acquisition was treated as a
purchase for financial reporting purposes and, accordingly, these consolidated
financial statements include the operations of Ladenburg from the date of
acquisition. The excess of the consideration paid over the estimated fair value
of net assets acquired of $1,342 has been recorded as goodwill to be amortized
on a straight-line basis over 15 years.
On January 10 and January 11, 1996, the Company acquired four commercial
office buildings (the "Office Buildings") and eight shopping centers (the
"Shopping Centers") for an aggregate purchase price of $183,900, consisting of
$23,900 in cash and $160,000 in non-recourse mortgage financing. In addition,
the Company has capitalized approximately $800 in costs related to the
acquisitions. The Company paid $11,400 in cash and executed four promissory
notes aggregating $100,000 for the Office Buildings. The Shopping Centers were
acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $72,500, consisting of $12,500 in
cash and $60,000 in eight promissory notes.
On January 11, 1996, the Company provided a $10,600 convertible bridge loan
to finance Thinking Machines Corporation ("Thinking Machines"), a developer and
marketer of data mining and knowledge discovery software and services. In
February 1996, the bridge loan was converted into a controlling interest in a
partnership which holds 3.3 million common shares of Thinking Machines which
represent 61.4% of Thinking Machines' outstanding common shares. The acquisition
of Thinking Machines through the conversion of the bridge loan was accounted for
as a purchase for financial reporting purposes, and accordingly, the operations
of Thinking Machines subsequent to January 31, 1996 are included in the
operations of the Company. The fair value of assets acquired, including goodwill
of $1,726, was $27,301 and liabilities assumed totaled $7,613. In addition,
minority interests in the amount of $9,088 were recognized at the time of
acquisition. Thinking Machines is also subject to uncertainties relating to,
without limitation, the development and marketing of computer products,
including customer acceptance and required funding, technological changes,
capitalization, and the ability to utilize and exploit its intellectual property
and propriety software technology.
F-60
<PAGE> 62
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The following table presents unaudited pro forma and actual results of
continuing operations as if the acquisitions of Ladenburg, Thinking Machines,
and the Office Buildings and Shopping Centers, had occurred on January 1, 1995.
These pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do
not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had each of these
acquisitions been consummated as of such date.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1996 1995
---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues.................................................... $ 111,954 $116,315
========= ========
Loss from continuing operations............................. $ (13,532) $ (3,715)
========= ========
Loss from continuing operations applicable to common
shares.................................................... $ (71,202) $(35,676)
========= ========
Loss from continuing operations per common share............ $ (7.43) $ (3.73)
========= ========
</TABLE>
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As noted above, the Company sold FSI during the fourth quarter of 1994 and
sold the Messaging Services Business effective October 1, 1995. During the
fourth quarter of 1996, Thinking Machines adopted a plan to terminate its
parallel processing computer sales and service business. Consequently, the
operating results of this segment have been classified as discontinued
operations. Thinking Machines wrote-down certain assets, principally inventory,
related to these operations to their net realizable value and recorded a charge
of $6,100 for these reserves, which is included in the loss on discontinued
operations. Accordingly, the financial statements reflect the financial position
and the results of operations of the discontinued operations of FSI, the
Messaging Services Business, and Thinking Machines separately from continuing
operations.
Summarized operating results of the discontinued operations, as shown
below, include the discontinued operations of Thinking Machines for the eleven
months ended December 31, 1996, the Messaging Services Business for the nine
months ended September 30, 1995 and the operations of FSI and Messaging Services
Business for the year ended December 31, 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues.................................................... $15,017 $37,771 $489,916
======= ======= ========
Operating (loss) income..................................... $(6,222) $ 4,795 $ 85,125
======= ======= ========
Income before income taxes and minority interests........... $(6,222) $ 4,795 $ 85,125
Provision for income taxes.................................. -- 480 5,500
Minority interests.......................................... 2,404 -- --
------- ------- --------
Net (loss) income........................................... $(3,818) $ 4,315 $ 79,625
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
In December 1996, Thinking Machines sold part of its discontinued
operations for $4,300 in cash which resulted in the Company recording a gain on
disposal of discontinued operations of $2,386, net of minority interests of
$1,502. No material gain or loss in the disposal of Thinking Machines' remaining
discontinued operations is anticipated.
During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Company received $5,774 in cash and
$600 in a promissory note in settlement of a receivable claim originally began
by Western Union Telegraph Company. The promissory note is payable $100 per
month for six months. In addition, the Company reduced its liability related to
certain Western Union retirees by $784. The Company recorded the gain on
settlement of $6,374 and liability reduction of $784 as gain on disposal of
discontinued operations.
F-61
<PAGE> 63
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
5. INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Investment securities classified as available for sale are carried at fair
value, with net unrealized gains included as a separate component of
shareholders' equity (deficit). The Company had net realized gains on sales of
investment securities available for sale of $1,347 ($6,114 of realized gains and
$4,767 of realized losses) for the year ended December 31, 1996, and $6,736
($9,223 of realized gains and $2,487 of realized losses) for the year ended
December 31, 1995.
The components of investment securities available for sale are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS
UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
COST GAIN LOSS VALUE
-------- ---------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
Marketable equity securities:
RJR Nabisco common stock.................... $ 53,372 $5,827 $ 59,199
Other marketable securities................. 2,057 674 $ 476 2,255
-------- ------ ------ --------
Total marketable equity
securities........................ 55,429 6,501 476 61,454
Marketable debt securities (long-term)........ 3,685 969 2,716
-------- ------ ------ --------
Total securities available for sale........... 59,114 6,501 1,445 64,170
Less long-term portion of investment
securities.................................. (3,685) (969) (2,716)
-------- ------ ------ --------
Investment securities -- current portion...... $ 55,429 $6,501 $ 476 $ 61,454
======== ====== ====== ========
1995
Marketable equity securities:
RJR Nabisco common stock.................... $149,005 $1,441 $150,446
Other marketable securities................. 9,147 1,667 $ 308 10,506
-------- ------ ------ --------
Total marketable equity
securities........................ 158,152 3,108 308 160,952
U.S. government securities.................... 49,219 144 -- 49,363
Marketable debt securities (long-term)........ 517 -- -- 517
-------- ------ ------ --------
Total investment securities................... 207,888 3,252 308 210,832
Less long-term portion of investment
securities.................................. (517) -- -- (517)
-------- ------ ------ --------
Investment securities -- current portion...... $207,371 $3,252 $ 308 $210,315
======== ====== ====== ========
</TABLE>
As of December 31, 1996, the long-term portion of investment securities
available for sale consisted of marketable debt securities which mature in two
years. In December 1996, the Company acquired marketable debt securities with a
face amount of $14,900 for a cost of $3,185 of a company that was in default at
the time of purchase and is currently in default under its various debt
obligations.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary,
held approximately 1.7 million shares of RJR Nabisco Holdings Corp. ("RJR
Nabisco") common stock with a market value of $59,199 (cost of $53,372). On
December 31, 1995, the Company held approximately 4.9 million shares of RJR
Nabisco common stock which collateralized margin loan financing of $75,119.
On October 17, 1995, the Company entered into an agreement, as amended (the
"Agreement"), with High River Limited Partnership ("High River"), an entity
owned by Carl C. Icahn. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company sold
approximately 1.6 million shares of RJR Nabisco common stock to High River for
an aggregate purchase price of $51,000. The Agreement also provided for the
parties to pay certain other fees to each other under certain circumstances,
including a fee to High River equal to 20% of the Company's profit on its RJR
Nabisco common stock, after certain expenses as defined in the Agreement.
F-62
<PAGE> 64
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
On December 27, 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with Brooke
Group Ltd. ("Brooke"), an affiliate of the Company, pursuant to which it agreed
to pay directly or reimburse Brooke and its subsidiaries for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with Brooke's solicitation of
consents and proxies from the shareholders of RJR Nabisco. The Company also
agreed to pay to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brooke a fee of 20% of the net
profit received by the Company or its subsidiaries from the sale of shares of
RJR Nabisco common stock after the Company and its subsidiaries have achieved a
rate of return of 20% and after deduction of certain expenses incurred by the
Company and its subsidiaries, including the cost of the consent and proxy
solicitations and of acquiring the shares of common stock. The Company has also
agreed to indemnify Brooke and its affiliates against certain liabilities
arising out of the solicitations.
On December 28, 1995, the Company, Brooke and Liggett, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Brooke, engaged Jefferies & Company, Inc. ("Jefferies") to act as
a financial advisor in connection with the Company's investment in RJR Nabisco
and Brooke's solicitation of consents and proxies. In connection with this
engagement, the Company paid Jefferies $1,538 and $1,500 in 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The companies also have agreed to pay Jefferies 10% of the net
profit (up to a maximum of $15,000) with respect to RJR Nabisco common stock
(including the distributions made by RJR Nabisco) held or sold by these
companies and their affiliates after deduction of certain expenses, including
the costs of the solicitations and the costs of acquiring the RJR Nabisco common
stock.
As of June 5, 1996, the Company and High River terminated the Agreement by
mutual consent. The termination leaves in effect for one year certain provisions
of the Agreement concerning payments to be made to High River in the event the
Company achieves a profit (after deducting certain expenses) on its shares of
RJR Nabisco common stock or such shares are valued at the end of such year at
higher than their purchase price or in the event the Company or Brooke engage in
certain transactions with RJR Nabisco.
The Company expensed $11,724 in 1996 and $3,879 in 1995 relating to the RJR
Nabisco investment. Included in this amount is $2,370 in out-of-pocket expenses
paid to Brooke in 1996 pursuant to the Brooke agreement. At March 14, 1997, the
Company held approximately 1,063,000 shares of RJR Nabisco common stock with a
market value of $35,997 (cost of $32,574). The Company's investment in RJR
Nabisco decreased from a $5,827 unrealized gain at December 31, 1996 to a $3,423
unrealized gain at March 14, 1997. Based on the market price of the RJR Nabisco
common stock at March 14, 1997, no amounts are payable by the Company under any
of its net profit-sharing arrangements with respect to the RJR Nabisco common
stock discussed above.
On February 29, 1996, the Company entered into a total return equity swap
transaction (the "Swap") with an unaffiliated company relating to 1,000,000
shares of RJR Nabisco common stock. The Swap was for a period of six months and
the Company realized a loss on the Swap of $7,305 for the year ended December
31, 1996.
6. TRADING SECURITIES OWNED AND SECURITIES SOLD, NOT YET PURCHASED
The components of trading securities owned and securities sold, not yet
purchased are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
-------------------------- --------------------------
TRADING SECURITIES TRADING SECURITIES
SECURITIES SOLD, NOT YET SECURITIES SOLD, NOT YET
OWNED PURCHASED OWNED PURCHASED
---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common stock............................... $21,248 $ 5,900 $21,828 $ 2,754
Equity and index options................... 6,241 11,243 6,134 10,293
Other...................................... 2,272 -- 3,249 --
------- ------- ------- -------
$29,761 $17,143 $31,211 $13,047
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
F-63
<PAGE> 65
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
7. INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE AND NOTES PAYABLE
The components of the Company's investment in real estate and the related
non-recourse notes payable collateralized by such real estate at December 31,
1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OFFICE SHOPPING
BUILDINGS CENTERS TOTAL
--------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Land.................................................... $ 19,450 $16,710 $ 36,160
Buildings............................................... 92,332 54,468 146,800
Construction-in-progress................................ -- 233 233
-------- ------- --------
Total......................................... 111,782 71,411 183,193
Less accumulated depreciated............................ (2,308) (1,314) (3,622)
-------- ------- --------
Net investment in real estate................. $109,474 $70,097 $179,571
======== ======= ========
Notes payable........................................... $ 99,704 $58,547 $158,251
Current portion of notes payable........................ 310 -- 310
-------- ------- --------
Notes payable -- long-term portion...................... $ 99,394 $58,547 $157,941
======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the Company's investment in real estate
collateralized four promissory notes aggregating $99,704 related to the Office
Buildings and eight promissory notes aggregating $58,547 related to the Shopping
Centers. The Office Building notes bear interest at 7.5%, require principal
amortization over approximately 40 years, with maturity dates ranging from 2006
to 2011. The Office Building notes have fixed monthly principal and interest
payments aggregating $648. Each Shopping Center note has a term of five years,
requires no principal amortization, and bears interest payable monthly at the
rate of 8% for the first two and one-half years and at the rate of 9% for the
remainder of the term.
Required principal payments on the notes payable over the next five years
are $310 in 1997, $336 in 1998, $361 in 1999, $390 in 2000, and $58,967 in 2001.
8. LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS
Long-term investments consisted of investments in the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
------------------ ------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
-------- ------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Limited partnerships.............................. $ 7,054 $ 7,914 $18,715 $23,200
Foreign corporations.............................. 2,000 2,000 6,000 6,000
Joint venture..................................... 3,796 3,796 3,796 3,796
Other............................................. 420 420 1,001 1,001
------- ------- ------- -------
Total................................... $13,270 $14,130 $29,512 $33,997
======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The principal business of the limited partnerships is investing in
investment securities. The estimated fair value of the limited partnerships was
provided by the partnerships based on the indicated market values of the
underlying investment portfolio. During 1996, the Company liquidated its
position in two limited partnerships with an aggregate carrying amount of
$14,500 and recognized a gain on such liquidations of $4,201. At December 31,
1996, the Company had committed to fund one of the limited partnerships up to an
additional $17,000. At December 31, 1995, the investment in foreign corporations
was comprised of an indirect ownership of a 1.9% interest in a Brazilian
airplane manufacturer acquired for $12,698, and a 10% equity interest in a
company that owns an interest in a Russian commercial bank acquired for $2,000
(which the Company has sold subsequent to December 31, 1996 for an amount
approximating its cost). The joint venture represents an investment of $6,888 in
bonds of a foreign republic with a face amount of approximately
F-64
<PAGE> 66
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
$12,000. The joint venture partner is in the process of litigation to collect
the amounts owed under these bonds. During 1995, the Company determined that an
other than temporary impairment in the value of its Brazilian investment and its
investment in the joint venture had occurred. Accordingly, $11,790 was provided
for the Brazilian investment and for the investment in the joint venture as an
impairment charge in 1995.
During 1996, the Company sold its Brazilian investment for $8,285 in cash,
which included $1,300 as reimbursement of the Company's expenses related to this
investment. The Company, after writing down this investment by $8,698 in 1995,
recognized a gain on the sale of the Brazilian investment of $4,285 in 1996
representing a partial recovery of the impaired carrying value. In 1996, the
Company determined that an other than temporary impairment in the value of its
equity interest in a computer software company had occurred and, accordingly,
$1,001 was provided as an impairment charge.
The fair value of the Company's long-term investments approximates its
carrying amount. The Company's estimate of the fair value of its long-term
investments are subject to judgment and are not necessarily indicative of the
amounts that could be realized in the current market.
9. PENSIONS AND RETIREE BENEFITS
Ladenburg has a Profit Sharing Plan (the "Plan") for substantially all its
employees. The Plan includes two features: profit sharing and a deferred
compensation vehicle. Contributions to the profit sharing portion of the Plan
are made by Ladenburg on a discretionary basis. The deferred compensation
feature of the Plan enables non-salaried employees to invest up to 15% of their
pre-tax annual compensation. For the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995,
employer contributions to the Plan were approximately $200 in each year,
excluding those made under the deferred compensation feature described above.
The Company maintains 401(k) plans for substantially all employees, except
those employees of Thinking Machines. These 401(k) plans allow eligible
employees to invest a percentage of their pre-tax compensation. The Company made
no discretionary contributions to these 401(k) plans in 1996.
During 1994, the Company maintained a suspended defined benefit plan and
two defined contribution plans which covered virtually all full-time employees.
Total pension costs accrued under all plans were $18,900 in 1994 and are
included in the results of the discontinued operations. Contributions were made
to the pension plans in amounts necessary to meet the minimum funding
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").
As discussed in Note 1, the liabilities related to these pension plans were
assumed by FFMC on November 15, 1994. These liabilities aggregated approximately
$245,000 at the date of sale.
Net pension cost accrued under defined benefit plans for 1994 was:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1994
------------
<S> <C>
Service cost................................................ $ 1,250
Interest cost............................................... 35,490
Return on assets............................................ (21,448)
Net amortization and deferral............................... --
--------
Net pension cost.................................. $ 15,292
========
</TABLE>
Actuarial assumptions underlying the above data for financial statement
purposes were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994
-------
<S> <C>
Discounted rates............................................ 7.5-8.5%
Assumed rates of return on invested assets.................. 10.0%
</TABLE>
F-65
<PAGE> 67
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The change in discount rates from 7.5% to 8.5% as of March 31, 1994
resulted in a $29,200 decrease in the minimum pension liability.
The Company made contributions to its suspended defined benefit pension
plans in amounts necessary to meet minimum funding requirements under ERISA.
Cash contributions to such suspended plans were $20,300 in 1994. Pension expense
for defined contribution plans was $3,100 in 1994. Effective November 15, 1994,
sponsorship of these defined contribution plans were assumed by FFMC.
10. COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The Company and Ladenburg are currently obligated under two noncancelable
lease agreements for office space, expiring in September 2000 and December 2015,
respectively. The following is a schedule by fiscal year of future minimum
rental payments required under the agreements that have noncancelable terms of
one year or more at December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997........................................................ $ 5,098
1998........................................................ 5,095
1999........................................................ 4,831
2000........................................................ 4,661
2001........................................................ 3,234
2002 and thereafter......................................... 52,973
-------
$75,892
=======
</TABLE>
During 1994, the Company leased certain real properties for use as customer
service centers, corporate headquarters and sales offices. It also leased
certain data communications terminals, electronic data processing equipment and
automobiles. Effective November 15, 1994, virtually all of these leases were
assumed by FFMC as part of the sale of FSI.
Rental expense for operating leases for the years ended 1996, 1995, and
1994 was $3,914, $1,677, and $3,600, respectively. Virtually all of the rental
expense for the year ended 1994 is included in the results of the discontinued
operations.
Lawsuits
The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits and may be subject to
unasserted claims primarily in connection with its activities as a securities
broker-dealer and participation in public underwritings. These lawsuits involve
claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts and are in varying stages of
legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, after consultation with
counsel, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
11. FEDERAL INCOME TAX
At December 31, 1996, the Company had $91,272 of unrecognized net deferred
tax assets, comprised primarily of net operating loss carryforwards, available
to offset future taxable income for federal tax purposes. A valuation allowance
has been provided against this deferred tax asset as it is presently deemed more
likely than not that the benefit of the tax asset will not be utilized. The
Company continues to evaluate the realizability of its deferred tax assets and
its estimate is subject to change. The provision for income taxes, which
represented the effect of the Alternative Minimum Tax and state income taxes,
for the three years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, does not bear a
customary relationship with pre-tax accounting income from continuing operations
principally as a consequence of the change in the valuation allowance
F-66
<PAGE> 68
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
relating to deferred tax assets. The provision for income taxes on continuing
operations differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the
applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate (35%) to pretax income from
continuing operations as a result of the following differences:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
-------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Loss) income from continuing operations................ $(13,216) $ 1,374 $(15,265)
-------- ------- --------
(Credit) provision under statutory U.S. tax rates....... (4,626) 583 (5,518)
(Decrease) increase in taxes resulting from:
Nontaxable items...................................... (119) 543 2,100
State taxes, net of Federal benefit................... 195 180 (122)
Increase (decrease) in valuation reserve................ 4,850 (1,014) 3,040
-------- ------- --------
Income tax provision (benefit)................ $ 300 $ 292 $ (500)
======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
Income taxes associated with discontinued operations and extraordinary
items have been shown net of the utilization of the net operating loss
carryforward and the change in other deferred tax assets.
Deferred tax amounts are comprised of the following at December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforward:
Restricted net operating loss.......................... $ 18,675 $ 21,786
Unrestricted net operating loss........................ 65,237 51,156
Other..................................................... 10,399 14,592
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets......................... 94,311 87,534
Deferred tax liabilities:
Other..................................................... (3,039) (2,856)
-------- --------
Total deferred tax liabilities.................... (3,039) (2,856)
-------- --------
Net deferred tax assets..................................... 91,272 84,678
Valuation allowance......................................... (91,272) (84,678)
-------- --------
Net deferred taxes................................ $ -- $ --
======== ========
</TABLE>
In December 1987, the Company consummated certain restructuring
transactions that included certain changes in the ownership of the Company's
stock. The Internal Revenue Code restricts the amount of future income that may
be offset by losses and credits incurred prior to an ownership change. The
Company's annual limitation on the use of its net operating losses is
approximately $7,700, computed by multiplying the "long-term tax exempt rate" at
the time of change of ownership by the fair market value of the company's
outstanding stock immediately before the ownership change. The limitation is
cumulative; any unused limitation from one year may be added to the limitation
of a following year. Operating losses incurred subsequent to an ownership change
are generally not subject to such restrictions.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had consolidated net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $208,000 for tax purposes, which expire at
various dates through 2007. Approximately $46,000 of net
F-67
<PAGE> 69
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
operating loss carryforwards constitute pre-change losses and $162,000 of net
operating losses were unrestricted.
12. OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
The components of other long-term liabilities, excluding notes payable, are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995
------------------- -------------------
LONG-TERM CURRENT LONG-TERM CURRENT
PORTION PORTION PORTION PORTION
--------- ------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Amount payable to FFMC pursuant to the purchase
contract........................................ $ 3,500 $6,567
Retiree and disability obligations................ $ 6,774 $1,700 8,467 1,800
Minority interests................................ 4,775 -- -- --
Other long-term liabilities....................... 733 300 -- --
------- ------ ------- ------
Total other long-term liabilities....... $12,282 $2,000 $11,967 $8,367
======= ====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
13. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED SHARES
At December 31, 1996, the Company had authorized and outstanding 2,000,000
and 1,071,462, respectively, of its Class A Senior Preferred Shares. At December
31, 1995, there were 1,107,566 Class A Senior Preferred Shares outstanding. At
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively, the carrying value of such shares
amounted to $210,571 and $226,396, including undeclared dividends of $117,117
and $121,893, or $109.31 and $110.06 per share.
The holders of Class A Senior Preferred Shares are currently entitled to
receive a quarterly dividend, as declared by the Board, payable at the rate of
$19.00 per annum. The Class A Senior Preferred Shares are mandatorily redeemable
on January 1, 2003 at $100 per share plus accrued dividends. The Class A Senior
Preferred Shares were recorded at their market value ($80 per share) at December
30, 1987, the date of issuance. The discount from the liquidation value is
accreted, utilizing the interest method, as a charge to additional paid-in
capital and an increase to the recorded value of the Class A Senior Preferred
Shares, through the redemption date. As of December 31, 1996, the unamortized
discount on the Class A Senior Preferred Shares was $5,430.
In the event a required dividend or redemption is not made on the Class A
Senior Preferred Shares, no dividends shall be paid or declared and no
distribution made on any junior stock other than a dividend payable in junior
stock. If at any time six quarterly dividends payable on the Class A Senior
Preferred Shares shall be in arrears or such shares are not redeemed when
required, the number of directors will be increased by two and the holders of
the Class A Senior Preferred Shares, voting as a class, will have the right to
elect two directors until full cumulative dividends shall have been paid or
declared and set aside for payment. Such directors were designated pursuant to
the Joint Plan in November 1994.
Pursuant to the Joint Plan, the Company made an $80 per share cash tender
offer for a maximum of 150,000 Class A Senior Preferred Shares. This tender
offer expired February 17, 1995 and resulted in a payment of $4,355 for 54,445
shares tendered and increased the Company's additional paid-in capital by
$7,358.
Pursuant to the Joint Plan, the Company declared a cash dividend in
December 1994 on the Class A Senior Preferred Shares of $50 per share which was
paid in January 1995. The Company declared and paid cash dividends on the Class
A Senior Preferred Shares of $40 per share in 1996 and $50 per share in 1995.
Undeclared dividends are accrued quarterly and such accrued and unpaid dividends
shall accrue additional
F-68
<PAGE> 70
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
dividends in respect thereof compounded monthly at the rate of 19% per annum,
both of which accruals are included in the carrying amount of redeemable
preferred shares, offset by a charge to additional paid-in capital.
On April 6, 1995, the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") authorized
the Company to repurchase as many as 200,000 shares of its Class A Senior
Preferred Shares. The Company completed the repurchase for an aggregate
consideration of $18,674 and thereafter, on June 21, 1995, the Board authorized
the Company to repurchase as many as 300,000 additional shares. The Company
repurchased in the open market 33,000 of such shares in July 1995 and 106,400 of
such shares in September 1995 for an aggregate consideration of $24,732. During
the first quarter of 1996, the Company repurchased 72,104 of such shares for an
aggregate consideration of $10,530. The repurchase of the Class A Senior
Preferred Shares increased the Company's additional paid-in capital by $4,279
for the 72,104 shares acquired in 1996 and by $32,984 for the 339,400 shares
acquired in 1995 based on the difference between the purchase price and the
carrying values of the shares.
On November 18, 1996, the Company granted to an officer of the Company
36,000 Class A Senior Preferred Shares (the "Award Shares"). The Award Shares
are identical with all other Class A Senior Preferred Shares issued and
outstanding as of July 1, 1996, including undeclared dividends of $3,776 and
declared dividends of $1,080. The Award Shares vest one-sixth on July 1, 1997
and one-sixth on each of the five succeeding one-year anniversaries thereof
through and including July 1, 2002. The Company recorded deferred compensation
of $5,436 representing the fair market value of the Award Shares on November 18,
1996 and $3,020 of original issue discount representing the difference between
the book value of the Award Shares on November 18, 1996 and their fair market
value. The deferred compensation will be amortized over the vesting period and
the original issue discount will be accreted, utilizing the interest method,
through the redemption date, both through a charge to compensation expense.
During 1996, the Company recorded $359 in compensation expense related to the
Award Shares and, at December 31, 1996, the balance of the deferred compensation
and the unamortized discount related to the Award Shares was $8,097.
For information on Class A Senior Preferred Shares owned by Brooke, see
Note 18.
14. PREFERRED SHARES NOT SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION REQUIREMENTS
The holders of the $3.00 Class B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares
($25 Liquidation Value), $.10 par value per share (the "Class B Preferred
Shares"), 12,000,000 shares authorized and 2,790,776 shares outstanding as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, are entitled to receive a quarterly dividend, as
declared by the Board, at a rate of $3.00 per annum. Undeclared dividends are
accrued quarterly at a rate of 12% per annum, and such accrued and unpaid
dividends shall accrue additional dividends in respect thereof, compounded
monthly at the rate of 12% per annum.
Each Class B Preferred Share is convertible at the option of the holder
into .41667 Common Shares based on a $25 liquidation value and a conversion
price of $60 per Common Share. During 1994, 155 Common Shares were issued upon
conversion of 372 Class B Preferred Shares.
At the option of the Company, the Class B Preferred Shares are redeemable
in the event that the closing price of the Common Shares equals or exceeds 140%
of the conversion price at a specified time prior to the redemption. If redeemed
by New Valley, the redemption price would equal $25 per share plus accrued
dividends.
In the event a required dividend is not paid on the Class B Preferred
Shares, no dividends shall be paid or declared and no distribution made on any
junior stock other than a dividend payable in junior stock. If at any time six
quarterly dividends on the Class B Preferred Shares are in arrears, the number
of directors will be increased by two, and the holders of Class B Preferred
Shares and any other classes of preferred shares similarly entitled to vote for
the election of two additional directors, voting together as a class, will have
the
F-69
<PAGE> 71
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
right to elect two directors to serve until full cumulative dividends shall have
been paid or declared and set aside for payment. Such directors were designated
pursuant to the Joint Plan in November 1994.
No dividends on the Class B Preferred Shares have been declared since the
fourth quarter of 1988. The undeclared dividends, as adjusted for conversions of
Class B Preferred Shares into Common Shares, cumulatively amounted to $115,944
and $95,100 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. These undeclared
dividends represent $41.55 and $34.08 per share as of the end of each period. No
accrual was recorded for such undeclared dividends as the Class B Preferred
Shares are not mandatorily redeemable.
15. COMMON SHARES
Stock Warrants. In 1996, 1995 and 1994, no warrants were exercised. Stock
warrants outstanding at December 31, 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON SHARES
SUBJECT TO EXERCISE
DATE ISSUED WARRANTS PRICE EXPIRATION DATE
----------- ------------- -------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
September 30, 1987.......................... 11,000 $50.00 November 13, 1997
October 30, 1987............................ 11,000 $50.00 November 13, 1997
------
22,000
======
</TABLE>
Stock Options. Under the 1987 Stock Option Plan (the "1987 Plan"), options
to purchase up to 1,500,000 Common Shares may be offered to key employees,
including officers, and non-employee directors. Options may be issued at an
exercise price of not less than 35% of the fair market value of the Common
Shares at date of grant.
A summary of transactions during 1995 with respect to options is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER
OF SHARES
OPTIONED PRICE RANGE
--------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at January 1, 1995.............................. 849,298 $4.00-$9.60
Exercised................................................... (141,250) $4.00
Canceled, expired or terminated............................. (708,048) $4.00-$9.60
--------
Outstanding at December 31, 1995............................ --
========
</TABLE>
On November 18, 1996, the Company granted an officer of the Company
nonqualified options to purchase 330,000 Common Shares at a price of $.58 per
share and 97,000 Class B Preferred Shares at a price of $1.85 per share. These
options may be exercised on or prior to July 1, 2006 and vest one-sixth on July
1, 1997 and one-sixth on each of the five succeeding anniversaries thereof
through and including July 1, 2002. The Company recognized compensation expense
of $24 in 1996 from these option grants and recorded deferred compensation of
$755 representing the intrinsic value of these options on December 31, 1996.
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations in
accounting for its stock options. In 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", which, if fully adopted, changes the
methods of recognition of cost on certain stock options. Had compensation cost
for the nonqualified stock options been determined based upon the fair value at
the grant date consistent with SFAS 123, the Company's net loss in 1996 would
have been increased by $33. The fair value of the nonqualified stock options was
estimated at $1,774 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following assumptions: volatility of 171% for the Class B Preferred Shares and
101% for the Common Shares, a risk free interest rate of 6.2%, an expected life
of 10 years, and no expected dividends or forfeiture.
F-70
<PAGE> 72
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
16. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
The composition of accounts payable and accrued liabilities is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------
1996 1995
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Accrued compensation...................................... $10,378 $ 6,981
Excise tax payable(a)..................................... 6,000 6,000
Subordinated loan payable(b).............................. 4,000 --
Deferred rent............................................. 4,388 --
Taxes (property and miscellaneous)........................ 2,637 2,637
Accrued expenses and other liabilities.................... 17,485 10,675
Due to affiliates......................................... -- 1,419
------- -------
Total............................................. $44,888 $27,712
======= =======
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(a) Represents an estimated liability related to excise taxes imposed on
annual contributions to retirement plans that exceed a certain percentage
of annual payroll. The Company intends to vigorously contest this tax
liability. Management's estimate of such amount is potentially subject to
material change in the near term.
(b) Represents a subordinated note payable held by Ladenburg's clearing broker.
The note paid interest at the rate of prime plus two percent and was paid
in full on January 14, 1997.
17. PREPETITION CLAIMS UNDER CHAPTER 11 AND RESTRUCTURING ACCRUALS
On January 18, 1995, approximately $550,000 of the approximately $620,000
of prepetition claims were paid pursuant to the Joint Plan. Another $54,000 of
prepetition claims and restructuring accruals have been settled and paid since
January 18, 1995. The remaining prepetition claims may be subject to future
adjustments depending on pending discussions with the various parties and the
decisions of the Bankruptcy Court.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------
1996 1995
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Restructuring accruals(a)................................... $ 9,024 $18,759
Money transfer payable(b)................................... 6,502 7,444
Accrued interest -- postpetition(c)......................... -- 3,634
Payable to connecting carriers.............................. -- 3,405
Other, miscellaneous........................................ -- 150
------- -------
Total............................................. $15,526 $33,392
======= =======
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(a) Restructuring accruals at December 31, 1996 consisted of $7,972 of disputed
claims, primarily related to leases and former employee benefits, and
$1,052 of other restructuring accruals. In 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company
reversed $9,706, $2,044 and $300, respectively, of prior year restructuring
accruals as a result of settlements on certain of its prepetition claims
and vacated real estate lease obligations. In 1994, the Company incurred
financial restructuring costs of $23,100 which consisted of professional
fees related to its financial restructuring.
(b) Represents unclaimed money transfers issued by the Company prior to January
1, 1990. The Company is currently in litigation in Bankruptcy Court seeking
a determination that these monies are not an obligation of the Company.
There can be no assurance as to the outcome of the litigation.
(c) Prior to the Joint Plan being confirmed on November 1, 1994, no interest
expense had been accrued on prepetition claims since December 31, 1992. The
terms of the Joint Plan provided for the payment of
F-71
<PAGE> 73
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
postpetition interest in the amount of $178,000 of which $174,366 was paid
in 1995 and $3,634 was paid in 1996. An extraordinary loss of $110,500 was
recorded for the extinguishment of this debt in 1995.
18. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
At December 31, 1996, Brooke, a company under the control of Bennett S.
LeBow, Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, held 3,989,710 Common
Shares (approximately 41.7% of such class), 618,326 Class A Senior Preferred
Shares (approximately 57.7% of such class), and 250,885 Class B Preferred Shares
(approximately 8.9% of such class) which represented in the aggregate 42.1% of
all voting power. Several of the other officers and directors of the Company are
also affiliated with Brooke. In 1995, the Company signed an expense sharing
agreement with Brooke pursuant to which certain lease, legal and administrative
expenses are allocated to the entity incurring the expense. The Company expensed
approximately $462 and $571 under this agreement in 1996 and 1995, respectively.
The Joint Plan imposes a number of restrictions on transactions between the
Company and certain affiliates of the Company, including Brooke, and establishes
certain restrictions on proposed investments.
On December 18, 1996, the Company loaned BGLS Inc. ("BGLS"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Brooke, $990 under a short-term promissory note due January 31,
1997 and bearing interest at 14%. On January 2, 1997, the Company loaned BGLS an
additional $975 under another short-term promissory note due January 31, 1997
and bearing interest at 14%. Both loans including interest were repaid on
January 31, 1997. At December 31, 1996, the loan and accrued interest thereon of
$996 was included in other current assets.
Two directors of the Company are affiliated with law firms that rendered
legal services to the Company. The Company paid these firms $4,141 and $1,083
during 1996 and 1995, respectively, for legal services. An executive officer and
director of the Company is a shareholder and registered representative in a
broker-dealer to which the Company paid $317 and $584 in 1996 and 1995,
respectively, in brokerage commissions and other income, and is also a
shareholder in an insurance company that received ordinary and customary
insurance commissions of $43 in 1996. The broker-dealer, in the ordinary course
of its business, engages in brokerage activities with Ladenburg on customary
terms. In 1995, a director of the Company received a commission of $800 on the
purchase of Ladenburg, of which $400 was paid by the Company and $400 was paid
by the selling shareholders.
In connection with their agreement to serve as Brooke nominees at RJR
Nabisco's 1996 annual meeting, two directors of the Company were each paid $30
by Brooke during the fourth quarter of 1995. In addition, Brooke also entered
into an agreement with each of the Brooke nominees whereby it agreed to
indemnify them against certain liabilities arising out of the solicitation of
proxies in support of the nominees' election at the annual meeting. As discussed
in Note 5, the Company has entered into certain other agreements with Brooke in
connection with its investment in RJR Nabisco.
During 1996, the Company entered into a court-approved Stipulation and
Agreement (the "Settlement") with Brooke and BGLS relating to Brooke's and
BGLS's application under the Federal Bankruptcy code for reimbursement of legal
fees and expenses incurred by them in connection with the Company's bankruptcy
reorganization proceedings. Pursuant to the Settlement, the Company reimbursed
to Brooke and BGLS $655 for such legal fees and expenses. The terms of the
Settlement were substantially similar to the terms of previous settlements
between the Company and other applicants who had sought reimbursement of
reorganization-related legal fees and expenses.
In connection with the acquisition of the Office Buildings by the Company
in 1996, a director of Brooke received a commission of $220 from the seller.
F-72
<PAGE> 74
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
See Note 22 for information concerning the purchase by the Company on
January 31, 1997 of BrookeMil Ltd. from a subsidiary of Brooke.
19. OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Ladenburg -- As a nonclearing broker, Ladenburg's transactions are cleared
by other brokers and dealers in securities pursuant to clearance agreements.
Although Ladenburg clears its customers through other brokers and dealers in
securities, Ladenburg is exposed to off-balance-sheet risk in the event that
customers or other parties fail to satisfy their obligations. In accordance with
industry practice, agency securities transactions are recorded on a
settlement-date basis. Should a customer fail to deliver cash or securities as
agreed, Ladenburg may be required to purchase or sell securities at unfavorable
market prices.
The clearing operations for Ladenburg's securities transactions are
provided by several brokers. At December 31, 1996, substantially all of the
securities owned and the amounts due from brokers reflected in the consolidated
balance sheet are positions held at and amounts due from one clearing broker.
Ladenburg is subject to credit risk should this broker be unable to fulfill its
obligations.
In the normal course of its business, Ladenburg enters into transactions in
financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments
consist of financial futures contracts and written index option contracts.
Financial futures contracts provide for the delayed delivery of a financial
instrument with the seller agreeing to make delivery at a specified future date,
at a specified price. These futures contracts involve elements of market risk in
excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of financial
condition. Risk arises from changes in the values of the underlying financial
instruments or indices. At December 31, 1996, Ladenburg had commitments to
purchase and sell financial instruments under futures contracts of $738 and
$3,120, respectively.
Equity index options give the holder the right to buy or sell a specified
number of units of a stock market index, at a specified price, within a
specified time from the seller ("writer") of the option and are settled in cash.
Ladenburg generally enters into these option contracts in order to reduce its
exposure to market risk on securities owned. Risk arises from the potential
inability of the counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts and
from changes in the value of a stock market index. As a writer of options,
Ladenburg receives a premium in exchange for bearing the risk of unfavorable
changes in the price of the securities underlying the option. Financial
instruments have the following notional amounts as December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG SHORT
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Equity and index options.................................... $351,126 $406,355
Financial futures contracts................................. 561 3,120
</TABLE>
The table below discloses the fair value at December 31, 1996 of these
commitments, as well as the average fair value during the period, based on
monthly observations.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AVERAGE
----------------- -----------------
LONG SHORT LONG SHORT
------ ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Equity and index options.............................. $6,241 $11,243 $9,967 $14,578
Financial futures contracts........................... 33 25 15 31
</TABLE>
For the year ended December 31, 1996, the net loss arising from options and
futures contracts included in net gain on principal transactions was $6,012. The
measurement of market risk is meaningful only when related and offsetting
transactions are taken into consideration.
F-73
<PAGE> 75
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
20. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments have been
determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies described below. However, considerable judgment is
required to develop the estimates of fair value and, accordingly, the estimates
presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be
realized in a current market exchange.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
-------------------- --------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents....................... $ 57,282 $ 57,282 $ 51,742 $ 51,742
Investments available for sale.................. 64,170 64,170 210,832 210,832
Trading securities owned........................ 29,761 29,761 31,211 31,211
Restricted assets............................... 8,846 8,846 38,005 38,005
Receivable from clearing brokers................ 23,870 23,870 13,752 13,752
Long-term investments (Note 8).................. 13,270 14,130 29,512 33,997
Financial liabilities:
Short-term loan................................. -- -- 75,119 75,119
Notes payable................................... 158,251 158,251
Redeemable preferred shares..................... 210,571 132,908 226,396 161,704
</TABLE>
21. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Prior to the acquisition of Ladenburg on May 1, 1995, virtually all of the
Company's operating businesses were reported as discontinued operations. The
following table presents certain financial information of the Company's
continuing operations before taxes and minority interests as of and for the
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SOFTWARE
BROKER- REAL ESTATE SALES AND CORPORATE
DEALER OPERATIONS SERVICES AND OTHER TOTAL
------- ----------- --------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
Revenues.............................. $71,960 $ 23,559 $ -- $ 16,435 $111,954
Operating income (loss)............... (345) (745) (8,860) (6,305) (16,255)
Identifiable assets................... 76,302 182,645 11,686 135,787 406,540
Depreciation and amortization......... 600 3,622 532 3 4,757
Capital expenditures.................. 3,644 183,193 1,596 18 188,451
1995
Revenues.............................. $40,418 $ 27,312 $ 67,730
Operating income...................... 1,475 191 1,666
Identifiable assets................... 61,175 324,647 385,822
Depreciation and amortization......... 608 -- 608
Capital expenditures.................. 372 -- 372
</TABLE>
22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Acquisition -- On January 31, 1997, the Company entered into a stock
purchase agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with Brooke (Overseas) Ltd.
("Brooke (Overseas)"), a wholly-subsidiary of Brooke, pursuant to which the
Company acquired 10,483 shares (the "BML Shares") of the common stock of
BrookeMil Ltd. ("BML") from Brooke (Overseas) for a purchase price of $55,000,
consisting of $21,500 in
F-74
<PAGE> 76
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
cash and a $33,500 9% promissory note of the Company (the "Note"). The BML
Shares comprise 99.1% of the outstanding shares of BML, a real estate
development company in Russia. The Note is collateralized by the BML Shares and
is payable $21,500 on June 30, 1997 and $12,000 on December 31, 1997.
BML is developing a three-phase complex on 2.2 acres of land in downtown
Moscow, for which it has a 98-year lease. In 1993, the first phase of the
project, Ducat Place I, a 46,500 sq. ft. Class-A office building, was
constructed and leased. On February 5, 1997, BML entered into an agreement to
sell Ducat Place I to one of its tenants for approximately $7,500, which
purchase price has been reduced to reflect prepayments of rent. The closing of
the sale is subject to a number of contingencies. If the transaction does not
occur by April 5, 1997, the tenant has the right to terminate the agreement and
apply its $1,000 down payment to its future rental obligations. In 1995, BML
began construction of Ducat Place II, a 150,000 sq. ft. office building. Ducat
Place II has been pre-leased to a number of leading international companies. The
third phase, Ducat Place III, is planned as a 400,000 sq. ft. mixed-use complex,
with construction anticipated to commence in 1998.
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, certain specified liabilities of
BML aggregating approximately $40,000 remained as liabilities of BML after the
purchase of the BML Shares of the Company. These liabilities include a $20,400
loan to a Russian bank for the construction of Ducat Place II. The loan, which
matures $6,100 in April 1997, $4,100 in July 1997 and $10,200 in October 1997,
is collateralized by a mortgage On Ducat Place II. In addition, the liabilities
of BML include approximately $13,800 of rents and related payments prepaid by
tenants of Ducat Place II for periods generally ranging from 15 to 18 months.
The Company is currently seeking long-term financing to replace the $20,400
construction loan related to Ducat Place II due in 1997 and for the development
of Ducat Place III. There is no assurance that the Company can obtain such
financing particularly in light of the political and economic risks associated
with investments in real estate in Russia.
On or about March 13, 1997, a shareholder derivative suit was filed against
the Company, as a nominal defendant, its directors and Brooke in the Delaware
Chancery Court, by a shareholder of the Company. The suit alleges that the
Company's purchase of the BML Shares constituted a self-dealing transaction
which involved the payment of excessive consideration by the Company. The
plaintiff seeks (i) a declaration that the Company's directors breached their
fiduciary duties, Brooke aided and abetted such breaches and such parties are
therefore liable to the Company, and (ii) unspecified damages to be awarded to
the Company. The Company's time to respond to the complaint has not yet expired.
The Company believes that the allegations are without merit, and it intends to
defend the suit vigorously.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed balance sheet gives effect to
the purchase of BML as if it had occurred on December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS REPORTED PRO FORMA
----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Assets:
Current assets............................................ $183,720 $172,867
Investment in real estate, net............................ 179,571 258,771
Other non-current assets.................................. 43,249 49,035
-------- --------
$406,540 $480,673
======== ========
Liabilities:
Current liabilities....................................... $ 98,110 $165,394
Long-term debt............................................ 157,942 157,942
Other long-term liabilities............................... 12,282 19,130
Redeemable preferred shares................................. 210,571 210,571
Shareholders' equity (deficit).............................. (72,364) (72,364)
-------- --------
$406,540 $480,673
======== ========
</TABLE>
F-75
<PAGE> 77
SCHEDULE II
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
(THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOSSES
ADDITIONS CHARGED TO
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO RESERVE, NET OTHER BALANCE AT
DESCRIPTION JANUARY 1, EXPENSES OF COLLECTIONS CHARGES(A) DECEMBER 31,
- ----------- ---------- ---------- -------------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year 1994
Allowance for uncollectible
receivables....................... $8,820 $4,614 $(4,946) $(8,488) $ --
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(a) The receivable and related allowance for uncollectible receivables were
sold to FFMC on November, 1994.
F-76
<PAGE> 78
SCHEDULE III
NEW VALLEY CORPORATION
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS AMOUNT CARRIED
COST AT CLOSE OF PERIOD
INITIAL COST CAPITALIZED --------------------------------
DESCRIPTION ----------------- NET OF BUILDINGS AND
AND LOCATION ENCUMBRANCES LAND BUILDING DELETIONS LAND IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL
------------ ------------ ------ -------- ----------- ------ ------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Office Buildings:
Bernards Township, NJ............... $ 43,960 $ 10,059 $ 38,432 -- $10,059 $ 38,432 $ 48,491
Bernards Township, NJ............... 10,312 2,342 9,172 -- 2,342 9,172 11,514
Troy, MI............................ 22,447 23,581 -- -- 23,581 23,581
Troy, MI............................ 22,985 7,049 21,147 -- 7,049 21,147 28,196
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
99,704 19,450 92,332 -- 19,450 92,332 111,782
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Shopping Centers:
Tri Cities, WA...................... 7,957 2,981 7,692 -- 2,981 7,692 10,673
Santa Fe, NM........................ 8,073 3,233 6,423 4 3,233 6,427 9,660
Portland, OR........................ 4,669 949 6,374 $(1,725) 722 4,876 5,598
Marathon, FL........................ 3,279 624 3,299 37 624 3,336 3,960
Seattle, WA......................... 10,386 3,354 9,069 35 3,354 9,104 12,458
Charleston, WV...................... 10,886 2,510 10,516 132 2,510 10,648 13,158
Royal Palm Beach, FL................ 8,274 2,032 7,867 1 2,032 7,868 9,900
Lincoln, NE......................... 5,020 1,254 4,750 -- 1,254 4,750 6,004
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
58,547 16,937 55,990 (1,516) 16,710 54,701 71,411
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Total................................. $158,251 $ 36,387 $148,322 $(1,516) $36,160 $147,033 $183,193
======== ======== ======= ======= ======= ======== ========
<CAPTION>
DESCRIPTION ACCUMULATED DATE DATE DEPRECIABLE
AND LOCATION DEPRECIATION CONSTRUCTED ACQUIRED LIFE
------------ ------------ ----------- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Office Buildings:
Bernards Township, NJ............... $ 961 1991 Jan 1996 40
Bernards Township, NJ............... 229 1994 Jan 1996 40
Troy, MI............................ 590 1987 Jan 1996 40
Troy, MI............................ 528 1990 Jan 1996 40
-------
$ 2,308
-------
Shopping Centers:
Tri Cities, WA...................... 192 1980 Jan 1996 40
Santa Fe, NM........................ 152 1964 Jan 1996 40
Portland, OR........................ 135 1978 Jan 1996 40
Marathon, FL........................ 79 1972 Jan 1996 40
Seatle, WA.......................... 187 1988 Jan 1996 40
Charleston, WV...................... 256 1985 Jan 1996 40
Royal Palm Beach, FL................ 195 1985 Jan 1996 40
Lincoln, NE......................... 118 1964 Jan 1996 40
-------
1,314
-------
Total................................. $ 3,622
=======
</TABLE>
(1) The Office Buildings were acquired on January 10, 1996 and the Shopping
Centers were acquired on January 11, 1996.
(2) The amounts shown for accumulated depreciation represents depreciation
expense for the year ended December 31, 1996.
(3) The only sale occurred at the shopping center located at Portland, OR. The
sale was for $1,750 and no gain or loss was recognized on the sale.
(4) Capital expenditures were approximately $234 for the year ended
December 31, 1996.
F-77
<PAGE> 79
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors of
Thinking Machines Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Thinking
Machines Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' investment and cash flows
for the period February 8, 1996 (Inception) to December 31, 1996. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Thinking
Machines Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for the period February 8, 1996
(Inception) to December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 11, 1997
F-78
<PAGE> 80
Independent Auditors' Report
The Board of Directors
MAI Systems Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' deficiency and cash flows of MAI Systems Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1994. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
MAI Systems Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1994,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
- ------------------------
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Orange County, California
March 9, 1995
F-79
