<PAGE> 1
===============================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
------------------------
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 25, 1994
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-2193
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
------------------------
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
STATE OF DELAWARE 95-0941880
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I. R. S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
4500 PARK GRANADA BOULEVARD
CALABASAS, CALIFORNIA 91399
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)
</TABLE>
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (818) 876-2000
------------------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- -----------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, $1 par value New York Stock Exchange; Pacific Stock
Exchange; The Stock Exchange, London; The
Stock Exchanges of Zurich and Geneva; and
Amsterdam Stock Exchange N.V.
(Prior to March 16, 1995)
</TABLE>
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained to the
best of registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. ___
At February 1, 1995, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $4,540,000,000.
At February 1, 1995, the registrant had 63,276,905 shares of common stock,
$1 par value, outstanding (9,775,996 shares held as treasury stock).
===============================================================================
<PAGE> 2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INCORPORATION
The Registrant is Lockheed Corporation which, together with its
consolidated subsidiaries (unless the context otherwise indicates), will be
referred to hereinafter as the "company," "Corporation," or "Lockheed." Lockheed
was incorporated in California in 1932. In 1986, under a plan of reorganization
approved by its stockholders, the company's domicile was changed from California
to Delaware. Its executive offices are located at 4500 Park Granada Boulevard,
Calabasas, California 91399, and its telephone number is (818) 876-2000.
On August 29, 1994, the company and Martin Marietta Corporation ("Martin")
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization pursuant to which, among
other things, the stockholders of each of the company and Martin would become
stockholders of a newly-formed holding company, named Lockheed Martin
Corporation ("Lockheed Martin"), and each of the company and Martin would become
wholly owned subsidiaries of Lockheed Martin (collectively, the "Combination").
The Combination was consummated on March 15, 1995 after approval by the
stockholders of each of the company and Martin. The financial statements
included in Part II were issued prior to the consummation of the Combination.
The information in this report describes the company prior to the Combination,
unless otherwise indicated.
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
Financial information about industry segments, foreign and domestic
operations, and export sales is included in the Selected Financial Data,
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part II.
Lockheed's primary businesses involve research, development, and production
of aerospace products, systems and services. Lockheed's operating companies are
aligned into four segments: Aeronautical Systems, Missiles and Space Systems,
Electronic Systems, and Technology Services. Information specific to particular
segments begins with the discussion related to Aeronautical Systems on page 4.
The company is engaged in a number of classified programs, and the results
of operations related to those programs are included in the company's
consolidated financial statements and other financial data included herein.
While no specific references to individual classified programs are -- or could
be -- made, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations provides comments regarding trends and results of the
classes of products that include these programs. The characteristics and
business risks associated with classified business do not differ materially from
those of the other programs and products in which the company participates.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
During 1994, 1993, and 1992, the company performed $2.8 billion, $3.1
billion, and $3.1 billion, respectively, of research and development work under
customer contracts. In addition, it expended $442 million in 1994, $449 million
in 1993, and $420 million in 1992 on company-sponsored research and development
and bid and proposal efforts, a substantial portion of which was included in
overhead allocable to U. S. government contracts.
During fiscal year 1994, the company did not undertake the development of a
new product or line of business requiring the investment of a material amount of
its total assets.
RAW MATERIALS
The company has not experienced difficulty in recent years in obtaining an
adequate supply of any raw materials or other supplies needed in its
manufacturing processes. The company believes that its experience in obtaining
such items will enable it to maintain its competitive position.
1
<PAGE> 3
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND OTHER RELATED AGREEMENTS
The company does not believe that expiration of any patent, trademark,
license, franchise, concession, or termination of any agreement relating thereto
would have a material effect on its business.
SEASONALITY
No portion of the business of the company is considered to be seasonal.
PROCUREMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
Many materials, items of equipment, and components used in the production
of the company's products are purchased from other manufacturers. The company
also purchases from outside sources such items as propulsion systems, guidance
systems, telemetry and gyroscopic devices, and electronic functional subsystems
in support of its missiles and space programs. In addition, the company often
subcontracts major sections of aircraft, such as wings, empennages, and landing
gears, to other companies. The company utilizes competitive bidding in its
procurement practices wherever feasible.
A significant portion of the equipment and components, especially engines,
selected avionics systems, and flight and engine instruments, used by the
company in the manufacture of its products under United States government
contracts is furnished without charge to the company by the government. The
company does not include in its sales that value which is represented by such
government-furnished equipment.
The company is dependent upon the ability of certain of its suppliers and
subcontractors to meet performance specifications, quality standards, and
delivery schedules in order to fulfill its commitments to its customers. While
the company endeavors to assure the availability of multiple sources of supply,
in certain cases involving complex equipment, it relies on a sole source. The
failure of certain suppliers or subcontractors to meet the company's needs would
adversely affect the company's operations.
Although certain priorities under United States government contracts may be
available, it has been and may continue to be necessary for the company to enter
early orders for its materials with long lead time requirements to assure
continued availability of materials needed for its programs under which such
priorities are unavailable.
DEPENDENCE UPON MAJOR CUSTOMER
A significant portion of the company's sales is associated with long-term
contracts and programs for the United States government in which there are
significant inherent risks. These risks include the uncertainty of economic
conditions, dependence on Congressional appropriations and administrative
allotment of funds, changes in governmental policies which may reflect military
and political developments, time required for design and development,
significant changes in contract scheduling, complexity of designs and the
rapidity with which product lines become obsolete due to technological advances,
constant necessity for design improvements, intense competition for available
government business, difficulty of forecasting costs and schedules when bidding
on developmental and highly sophisticated technical work, and other factors
characteristic of the industry. Foreign sales involve additional risks due to
possible changes in economic and political conditions.
FUNDED BACKLOG
Consolidated funded backlog at December 25, 1994, and December 26, 1993,
was $12.2 billion and $13.2 billion, respectively. Of the year-end 1994 backlog,
$4.3 billion is not anticipated to be filled by December 31, 1995. Funded
backlog by industry segment is included in Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II.
2
<PAGE> 4
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS AND REGULATIONS
The company's United States government business is performed under
cost-reimbursement-type contracts (cost-plus-fixed-fee, cost-plus-incentive-fee
and cost-plus-award-fee) and under fixed-price-type contracts (firm fixed-price
and fixed-price incentive). During 1994, 41 percent of the company's total sales
to the government were under fixed-price-type contracts, and 59 percent were
under cost-reimbursement-type contracts.
Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts provide for reimbursement of costs, to the
extent that such costs are allowable, and the payment of a fixed fee. This type
of contract differs from the cost-plus-incentive fee contract in that the latter
provides for increases or decreases in the contract fee, within specified
limits, based upon actual results as compared to contractual targets for such
factors as cost, quality, schedule, and performance. In addition, these contract
types differ from the cost-plus-award-fee contract in that the latter provides
for an award fee to be paid upon a subjective evaluation by the customer of the
company's performance, judged in such areas as quality, timeliness, ingenuity,
and cost-effectiveness of work.
Under firm fixed-price contracts, the company agrees to perform certain
work for a fixed price and, accordingly, realizes all the benefit or detriment
occasioned by decreased or increased costs of performing the contract.
Fixed-price incentive contracts are fixed-price-type contracts providing for
adjustment of profit and establishment of final contract prices by a formula
based on the relationship which final total costs bear to total target costs,
with the contractor absorbing costs which exceed a stipulated ceiling price.
Other factors affecting incentive compensation under a fixed-price incentive
contract, in addition to cost, may include reliability, schedule, and
performance.
Under United States government regulations, certain costs -- including
certain financing costs and marketing expenses -- are not allowable. The
government also regulates the methods under which costs are allocated to
government contracts. For information concerning the company's accounting
policies regarding sales and earnings, accounts receivable, and inventories
under government contracts, see Notes 1, 4, and 5, respectively, to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II.
United States government contracts are, by their terms, subject to
termination by the United States government either for its convenience or for
default of the contractor. Cost-reimbursement-type contracts provide that, upon
termination, the contractor is entitled to reimbursement of its allowable costs;
and, if the termination is for convenience, a total fee proportionate to the
percentage of the work completed under the contract. Fixed-price-type contracts
provide for payment upon termination for items delivered to and accepted by the
government; and, if the termination is for convenience, for payment of the
contractor's costs incurred plus the costs of settling and paying claims by
terminated subcontractors, other settlement expenses, and a reasonable profit on
its costs incurred. However, if a contract termination is for default, (i) the
contractor is paid such amount as may be agreed upon for completed and partially
completed products and services accepted by the government, (ii) the government
is not liable for the contractor's costs with respect to unaccepted items, and
is entitled repayment of advance payments and progress payments, if any, related
to the terminated portions of the contracts, and (iii) the contractor may be
liable for excess costs incurred by the government in procuring undelivered
items from another source.
In addition to the right of the government to terminate, government
contracts are conditioned upon the continuing availability of Congressional
appropriations. Congress usually appropriates funds on a fiscal-year basis even
though contract performance may take many years. Consequently, at the outset of
a major program, the contract is usually partially funded, and additional monies
are normally committed to the contract by the procuring agency only as
appropriations are made by Congress for future fiscal years.
Licenses are required from United States government agencies for export
from the United States of many of the company's products. The Export
Administration Act of 1979 forbids participation by Americans in international
boycotts of countries with which the United States maintains friendly trading
relations.
3
<PAGE> 5
COMPETITION AND RISK
The company encounters extensive competition in all of its lines of
business from numerous other companies. Substantial efforts must be undertaken
continually on a long-term basis in order to maintain existing levels of
business. In some cases, investment in fixed assets is involved.
Emphasis is placed by all United States government agencies on the
technical and managerial capabilities of the corporations seeking business.
Consequently, the degree to which the company may participate in future
government business will depend to a large extent on the effectiveness and
innovativeness of its research and development programs, its ability to offer
better program performance than its competitors at a lower cost to the
government, and its readiness in facilities, equipment, and manpower to
undertake the programs for which it may be competing.
For a further discussion of the risks inherent in the current defense
industry environment, see the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Part II.
AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS
The Aeronautical Systems segment comprises design and production of
fighter/bomber aircraft, special mission and high performance aircraft, and
systems for military operations, for airlift, for antisubmarine warfare, and for
reconnaissance and surveillance; and aircraft modification and maintenance for
military and civilian customers. Lockheed is the prime contractor on the F-16
"Fighting Falcon" fighter aircraft, the F-22 air superiority fighter program and
the C-130 airlift aircraft. Lockheed is also involved in upgrading aircraft,
including the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft and the F-117 fighter bomber.
MISSILES AND SPACE SYSTEMS
The Missiles and Space Systems segment comprises military and civil space
systems, research laboratories, strategic fleet ballistic missiles, tactical
defense missiles and communications systems. Lockheed is the prime contractor on
the Trident II, a submarine launched, strategic deterrent, fleet ballistic
missile, the Milstar communications satellite and the Theater High Altitude Area
Defense (THAAD) program which is intended to be a system capable of intercepting
theater ballistic missiles at high altitudes and long ranges. Lockheed also is a
principal subcontractor on the space station, has contracted to build spacecraft
for Motorola's Iridium TM/SM global communication system and has created a
partnership with two of the Russian Federation's major aerospace firms with
worldwide rights to Russia's Proton rocket, and offers Lockheed Launch Vehicle
services.
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS
The Electronic Systems segment participates in both defense and commercial
markets. For defense markets, Lockheed develops and manufactures radio
frequency, infrared, and electro-optic countermeasures systems; mission planning
systems; surveillance systems; automated test equipment; antisubmarine warfare
systems; microwave systems; and avionics. Lockheed also manufactures computer
graphics equipment and other electronic products and distributes computer
equipment and workstations for commercial markets worldwide.
TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
The Technology Services segment comprises space shuttle processing,
engineering sciences and support, management of the Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory for the Department of Energy, other environmental services, military
equipment maintenance and support services, airport facilities development and
management, data processing and transaction services.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The company, along with others, is involved, or has been notified of
potential involvement, in several United States Environmental Protection Agency
"Superfund" sites. Federal, state, and local requirements
4
<PAGE> 6
relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, the disposal of
hazardous wastes, and other factors affecting the environment have had and will
continue to have an impact on the manufacturing operations of the company. Thus
far, compliance with such provisions has been accomplished without material
effect on the company's capital expenditures, earnings, and competitive
position. For a further discussion, see Notes 1 and 10 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part II.
EMPLOYEES
At December 25, 1994, the company had approximately 82,500 employees, the
majority of whom are located in the United States. The company has a continuing
need for many skilled and professional personnel in order to meet contract
schedules and obtain new and ongoing orders for its products.
5
<PAGE> 7
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
At December 25, 1994, the company operated approximately 40 manufacturing
plants and research and development facilities throughout the U.S. and the
remainder consisted of sales offices, warehouses, and service centers. These
facilities had an aggregate floor space of approximately 42 million square feet,
a summary of which is listed in the table which follows. Of this floor space,
approximately 37% was owned by the company, approximately 21% was leased, with
the balance being made available under facilities contracts for use in the
performance of contracts with the United States government.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FLOOR AREA
--------------------------------------------
(THOUSANDS OF SQUARE FEET)
COMPANY GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS OWNED LEASED OWNED TOTAL
----------------- ------- ------ ---------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Aeronautical Systems Segment:
Abilene, Texas..................................... 369 395 764
Fort Worth, Texas.................................. 199 921 7,077 8,197
Palmdale, California............................... 2,213 168 758 3,139
Marietta, Georgia.................................. 1,744 414 6,460 8,618
Charleston, South Carolina......................... 160 160
Ontario, California................................ 1,057 1,057
Greenville, South Carolina......................... 607 607
Tucson, Arizona.................................... 270 270
San Bernardino, California......................... 198 198
Various(7)......................................... 118 87 205
Missiles and Space Systems Segment:
Sunnyvale and Palo Alto, California................ 6,538 2,439 833 9,810
Austin, Texas...................................... 609 116 725
Santa Cruz, California............................. 194 50 244
Huntsville, Alabama................................ 143 44 187
Various locations(15).............................. 241 241
Electronic Systems Segment:
Nashua, New Hampshire.............................. 2,494 90 2,584
Anaheim, California................................ 433 433
Scottsdale, Arizona................................ 68 14 82
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada............................ 108 108
Reno, Nevada....................................... 94 94
Various locations(90).............................. 12 375 387
Technology Services Segment:
Arlington, Texas................................... 36 36
Kennedy Space Center, Florida...................... 126 21 2,283 2,430
Stennis Space Center, Mississippi.................. 132 132
Teaneck, New Jersey................................ 41 41
Las Vegas, Nevada.................................. 108 4 112
Houston, Texas..................................... 283 34 317
Various locations(65).............................. 4 665 134 803
Corporate Office Facilities:
Calabasas, California.............................. 350 350
Washington, D.C.................................... 52 52
Denver, Colorado................................... 98 98
------ ----- ------ ------
Total...................................... 15,614 9,102 17,765 42,481
====== ===== ====== ======
</TABLE>
In addition to the amounts included in the above table, the company owned
or leased facilities with approximately 177,000 square feet in Seattle,
Washington, related to discontinued operations. The company also maintains
properties in Burbank, California, Plainfield, New Jersey, and at other
locations related to discontinued operations. A major portion of the properties
associated with discontinued operations are being prepared for sale or are
currently for sale.
6
<PAGE> 8
The company believes its facilities are generally well maintained, that it
has sufficient productive capacity to meet its projected needs, and such
productive capacity is adequately utilized but under continual review.
A large part of the company's activity is related to engineering and
research and development which is not susceptible to productive capacity
analysis. In the area of manufacturing, most of the operations are of a job-
order nature rather than an assembly line process, and productive equipment has
multiple uses for multiple products.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The EPA issued a notice of violation to the company on October 25, 1990,
alleging violation of the Clean Water Act by discharging chromiumcontaining
wastewater without pretreatment. During 1994, the company paid $460,000 in
settlement of this matter.
See also Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is
included in Part II.
The class action litigation referred to in Note 10 has been settled,
subject to court approval. The terms of the settlement are not materially
different from those reflected in the description of the agreement in principle.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not Applicable
7
<PAGE> 9
PART II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM PAGE
---- --------------
<C> <S> <C>
5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholders
Matters............................................................... 8
6. Selected Financial Data............................................... 9--10
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations................................................. 11--19
8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.............. 20--45
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.................................................. Not Applicable
</TABLE>
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
COMMON STOCK PRICES
(NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE -- COMPOSITE TRANSACTIONS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL
HIGH LOW CLOSE
---- ---- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1994 FISCAL QUARTERS
4th............................................... $74 3/8 $66 1/4 $71 3/4
3rd............................................... 79 1/2 60 7/8
2nd............................................... 66 1/2 58 3/4
1st............................................... 68 3/8 61 1/8
1993 FISCAL QUARTERS
4th............................................... 72 3/8 62 1/2 69 3/8
3rd............................................... 68 1/2 59 3/8
2nd............................................... 66 58
1st............................................... 63 54 1/4
</TABLE>
DIVIDENDS PAID ON COMMON STOCK
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1994
March 7............................. $.53
June 6.............................. .57
September 6......................... .57
December 5.......................... .57
1993
March 1............................. $.53
June 7.............................. .53
September 7......................... .53
December 6.......................... .53
</TABLE>
As of December 25, 1994, there were approximately, 11,000 holders of record
of Lockheed common stock.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Independent Auditors: Ernst & Young LLP, 515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Common Stock: Stock symbol: LK
Listed: New York; Pacific; London; Zurich and Geneva;
and Amsterdam stock exchanges
Transfer Agent: First Interstate Bank, 26610 West Agoura Road
Calabasas, California 91302
1-800-522-6645
</TABLE>
As a result of the consummation of the Combination, on March 15, 1995 each
share of the company's common stock was converted into a right to receive 1.63
shares of Lockheed Martin Common Stock. Trading in the company's common stock
ceased at the close of business on March 15, 1995. The company's common stock is
being delisted on all of the exchanges on which it was listed. The Lockheed
Martin Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
"LMT." The Transfer Agent for the Lockheed Martin Common Stock is First Chicago
Trust Company of New York.
8
<PAGE> 10
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following unaudited summary compares selected financial data for the
last ten years. Certain reclassifications and restatements have been made to
prior years' data on pages 9 and 10 to conform to the 1994 presentation,
including realignment of business segments and reclassification of operations
subsequently discontinued by the company. Aeronautical Systems reflects the
purchase of Lockheed Fort Worth Company (LFWC) in 1993. 1992 reflects the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106. Electronic
Systems reflects the purchase of Sanders and CalComp in 1986. Returns refer to
continuing operations before accounting change. Returns and trading turnover are
calculated using average balances as a base. Dividend yield represents the
annual dividend rate divided by year-end stock price.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- -----
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES, RATIOS, AND PER-SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING RESULTS
Sales ($):
Aeronautical Systems............ 6,573 6,010 2,957 2,635 2,722 2,944 3,566 4,455 4,264 4,017
Missiles and Space Systems...... 3,608 4,238 4,587 4,859 5,116 4,780 4,706 4,614 4,448 4,277
Electronic Systems.............. 1,650 1,396 1,289 1,122 963 1,107 1,256 1,226 429 105
Technology Services............. 1,299 1,427 1,267 1,193 1,157 1,060 905 783 801 824
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- -----
Total sales............... 13,130 13,071 10,100 9,809 9,958 9,891 10,433 11,078 9,942 9,223
====== ====== ====== ===== ===== ===== ====== ====== ===== =====
Program profits ($):
Aeronautical Systems............ 509 465 193 153 110 (365) 231 371 454 434
Missiles and Space Systems...... 266 348 401 360 379 368 364 364 310 273
Electronic Systems.............. 47 (1) 32 21 28 26 71 43 (6) (8)
Technology Services............. 33 32 18 42 44 24 34 36 23 27
------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ----- -----
Total program profits..... 855 844 644 576 561 53 700 814 781 726
====== ====== ====== ===== ===== ===== ====== ====== ===== =====
Program profit margins (%):
Aeronautical Systems............ 7.7 7.7 6.5 5.8 4.0 6.5 8.3 10.6 10.8
Missiles and Space Systems...... 7.4 8.2 8.7 7.4 7.4 7.7 7.7 7.9 7.0 6.4
Electronic Systems.............. 2.8 2.5 1.9 2.9 2.3 5.7 3.5
Technology Services............. 2.5 2.2 1.4 3.5 3.8 2.3 3.8 4.6 2.9 3.3
Consolidated program profit
margins....................... 6.5 6.5 6.4 5.9 5.6 0.5 6.7 7.3 7.9 7.9
Interest expense ($).............. 156 168 119 118 138 86 92 104 65 53
Earnings ($):
Continuing operations before
accounting change............. 445 422 348 308 335 6 458 438 421 398
Net earnings (loss)............. 445 422 (283) 308 335 2 624 421 408 401
Earnings per share ($):
Continuing operations before
accounting change............. 7.00 6.70 5.65 4.86 5.30 .10 7.61 6.67 6.38 6.06
Net earnings (loss)............. 7.00 6.70 (4.58) 4.86 5.30 .03 10.37 6.41 6.18 6.10
Dividends per share ($)........... 2.24 2.12 2.09 1.95 1.80 1.75 1.55 1.30 0.95 0.75
Average number of common and
common equivalent shares
outstanding..................... 63.6 62.9 61.7 63.4 63.2 62.6 60.2 65.7 66.0 65.7
Common shares outstanding at
year-end........................ 63.2 62.7 61.1 62.8 63.2 63.2 59.3 62.7 65.6 65.2
Return on common equity (%)....... 17.0 18.8 15.3 12.8 15.3 0.3 20.1 22.2 24.9 29.9
Return on assets (%).............. 4.9 5.3 5.1 4.6 4.9 0.1 7.0 7.0 8.0 10.4
Dividend payout ratio............. 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 17.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
</TABLE>
9
<PAGE> 11
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES, NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, RATIOS, AND PER-SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL POSITION
AT YEAR-END
Cash and cash
equivalents($)............. 452 147 294 266 372 86 269 40 72 64
Accounts receivable($)....... 1,732 1,644 1,590 1,590 1,880 1,786 1,816 1,868 1,558 1,550
Inventories($)............... 1,631 1,699 1,178 1,352 1,187 1,266 1,067 1,069 1,098 928
Property, plant, and
equipment($):
Cost, net of depreciation
and amortization......... 1,806 1,950 1,882 1,839 1,859 1,903 1,858 1,828 1,758 1,284
Depreciation for the year.. 299 328 294 284 319 328 318 292 233 175
Additions during the year.. 240 321 327 312 340 399 371 408 461 435
Total assets($).............. 9,113 8,961 7,024 6,617 6,860 6,792 6,643 6,460 6,133 4,328
Capitalization($):
Debt
Short-term............... 14 21 30 29 40 19 47 11 7 4
Long-term including
current portion........ 2,143 2,168 1,220 1,172 1,482 1,367 906 1,377 1,742 762
ESOP guarantee........... 382 407 431 452 472 490
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total debt............... 2,539 2,596 1,681 1,653 1,994 1,876 953 1,388 1,749 766
Common
stockholders' equity..... 2,807 2,443 2,042 2,503 2,309 2,062 2,476 2,087 1,866 1,511
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total capitalization... 5,346 5,039 3,723 4,156 4,303 3,938 3,429 3,475 3,615 2,277
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Percentage of total
capitalization represented
by(%):
Total debt................. 47 52 45 40 46 48 28 40 48 34
Total debt, ex-ESOP........ 40 43 34 29 35 35
Debt, net of cash.......... 43 50 40 36 41 46 22 39 47 32
Debt, ex-ESOP, net
of cash.................. 35 42 28 24 29 34
OTHER DATA
Funded sign-ups($)........... 12,139 17,371* 10,205 10,972 10,441 9,627 9,426 9,807 9,451 8,828
Funded backlog at
year-end($)................ 12,165 13,156 8,856 8,751 7,588 7,106 7,369 8,376 9,649 8,815
Negotiated backlog
at year-end($)............. 25,595 28,852 19,428 17,072 15,204 13,042 9,747 12,543 17,732 17,721
Company-sponsored research
and development (including
bid and proposal cost and
development cost-sharing)
($)........................ 442 449 420 384 450 506 503 506 441 399
Customer-sponsored
research and
development($)............. 2,836 3,134 3,102 3,282 3,750 3,715 3,456 2,946 2,701 2,946
Number of employees.......... 82,500 83,500 71,700 72,300 73,000 82,500 85,600 97,200 94,200 84,500
MARKET DATA AT FISCAL
YEAR-END
Stock price per
common share($)............ 71.75 69.38 56.88 44.00 33.63 39.00 42.75 36.75 50.63 48.00
Book value per common
share($)................... 44.41 38.96 33.42 39.86 36.53 32.63 41.75 33.29 28.45 23.17
Market value($).............. 4,535 4,350 3,475 2,763 2,125 2,465 2,535 2,304 3,321 3,130
Market to book ratio......... 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.8 2.1
Price to earnings ratio...... 10.3 10.4 10.1 9.1 6.3 390.0 5.6 5.5 7.9 7.9
Dividend yield(%)............ 3.1 3.1 3.7 4.5 5.4 4.6 3.7 3.8 2.0 1.7
Annual trading volume........ 34.3 27.0 29.5 66.3 30.2 71.9 60.9 114.5 88.4 66.5
Annual trading turnover(x)... 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.1 0.5 1.2 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.0
</TABLE>
---------------
* Includes acquisition of existing funded backlog of LFWC of approximately
$7 billion at acquisition date.
10
<PAGE> 12
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following unaudited analysis, comparing data from 1994, 1993, and 1992,
is intended to be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements
beginning on page 20. A broader, ten-year perspective may be obtained from the
tables of Selected Financial Data appearing on pages 9 and 10.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED SALES AND PROGRAM PROFITS
Consolidated sales in 1994 of $13.1 billion were relatively unchanged from
1993. Increases in Aeronautical and Electronic Systems sales were offset by
decreases in Missiles and Space Systems and Technology Services sales. The 29
percent sales increase from 1992 to 1993 reflects the 1993 acquisition of
Lockheed Fort Worth Company (LFWC), the former tactical military aircraft
business of General Dynamics Corporation. Sales to the U.S. government totalled
73 percent of 1994 sales compared to 77 percent in 1993. Defense sales to the
U.S. government remained constant at 64 percent of total sales in 1994 and 1993
versus 67 percent in 1992. Sales to foreign governments increased to 16 percent
in 1994 compared to 13 percent and eight percent in 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Sales made to foreign governments through the U.S. government are included in
sales to foreign governments. Sales to commercial customers increased slightly
to 11 percent of total sales. The table below illustrates the changing customer
mix.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SALES BY CUSTOMER 1994 1993 1992
----------------- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. government
Defense............................................... 64% 64% 67%
Nondefense............................................ 9 13 15
--- --- ---
73 77 82
Foreign governments..................................... 16 13 8
Commercial.............................................. 11 10 10
--- --- ---
100% 100% 100%
=== === ===
</TABLE>
Total program profits increased slightly in 1994 following an increase of
31 percent in 1993 from 1992 levels. Program profit margins were 6.5 percent in
1994 and 1993, and 6.4 percent in 1992. In 1994 program profit improvements in
Aeronautical Systems and Electronic Systems programs were offset in part by
charges against income for two programs in Missiles and Space Systems discussed
below. Program profit improvements in 1993 from 1992 primarily reflected the
LFWC acquisition.
Operations by business segment are discussed beginning on page 12.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense decreased in 1994 compared to 1993 due to lower average
outstanding balances offset in part by a slightly higher average effective
interest rate. Interest expense in 1993 was significantly higher than in 1992
due the higher debt incurred to finance the purchase of LFWC in 1993.
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS), NET
The results for 1994 reflect net other deductions of $4 million compared to
negligible net other income in 1993. The 1994 net amount was affected by higher
miscellaneous other deductions including merger related costs. Net other income
in 1992 reflected higher interest income from the temporary investment of excess
cash.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes in 1994 was lower than in 1993 reflecting a
lower effective tax rate (36 percent versus 38 percent). The decrease in the
effective tax rate was primarily due to interest received
11
<PAGE> 13
from adjustments to tax payments on long-term contracts and revisions to prior
years' estimated income tax liabilities, offset in part by a nondeductible fine
discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. Income tax
expense was higher in 1993 than in 1992 reflecting the higher pretax earnings
and a higher effective tax rate (38 percent versus 37 percent). The higher tax
rate was primarily due to the settlement of certain tax issues outstanding from
prior periods for a higher amount than had been accrued and a nondeductible
amount related to intangible asset amortization from the acquisition of LFWC.
EARNINGS BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
The five percent earnings increase in 1994 was primarily due to the higher
program profits, lower interest expense and lower provision for income taxes
offset by higher net other deductions. The per share earnings increase of four
percent was affected by a higher average number of shares and equivalents
outstanding in 1994. Earnings in 1993 increased 21 percent compared with 1992
due to the higher program profits, partly offset by higher interest expense,
lower other income and higher income tax expense.
If inflation were taken into account, earnings would differ from the
reported results due to the recognition of additional depreciation expense.
Contracts in the aerospace industry generally reflect the impact of anticipated
inflation in the selling price, and often contain price escalation clauses that
protect against abnormal inflation. In the case of depreciation, however,
regulations that determine U.S. government contract revenues do not allow
inflation-adjusted depreciation to be taken into account. Therefore, earnings
would have been lower than reported if inflation had been considered. Income
taxes would not have been adjusted because tax laws do not permit deductions of
such additional inflationary cost. Inflation rates in the United States have
been relatively low in recent years.
NET EARNINGS (LOSS)
Net earnings in 1994 and 1993 reflect the items discussed above. The net
loss in 1992 was caused by the effect of a change in accounting principle
related to the company's adoption of the accrual method of accounting for
retiree medical costs required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 106 (SFAS 106). The company's 1994 adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment
Benefits" (SFAS 112), and its 1992 adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" (SFAS 109), did not have a
significant impact.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS
Aeronautical Systems sales increased nine percent in 1994, and more than
doubled in 1993 reflecting the acquisition of LFWC effective February 28, 1993.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales
Fighter aircraft programs...................................... $4,039 $3,661 $ 363
Airlift aircraft programs...................................... 1,258 915 1,169
Aircraft modification and maintenance programs................. 525 517 538
Other aircraft programs and support activities................. 751 917 887
------ ------ ------
Total....................................................... $6,573 $6,010 $2,957
====== ====== ======
Program profits.................................................. $ 509 $ 465 $ 193
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Sales in fighter aircraft programs increased 10 percent in 1994 as a result
of higher F-22 and F-16 program revenues. F-16 fighter program revenues in 1994
compared to 1993 increased slightly while deliveries decreased (146 in 1994
versus 168 in 1993) reflecting changes in customer mix. The large increase in
1993 revenues compared to 1992 was primarily due to the acquisition of LFWC.
12
<PAGE> 14
Airlift aircraft program revenues increased 38 percent in 1994 due to
greater deliveries of C-130 aircraft (40 versus 30). The lower airlift aircraft
program revenues in 1993 reflect fewer deliveries in 1993 compared to the 35
aircraft delivered in 1992.
Revenues from aircraft modification and maintenance programs in 1994 were
relatively unchanged. The increases in military modification and maintenance
revenues were substantially offset by decreased sales in commercial modification
and maintenance programs. In 1993, both military and commercial aircraft
modification and maintenance revenues were lower than those reported in 1992.
Revenues from other aircraft programs and support activities were lower in
1994 compared to 1993 due to the absence of P-3 maritime patrol aircraft
deliveries compared to two deliveries in 1993. The decrease in 1994 also
reflects the absence of S-3 patrol aircraft upgrade sales due to completion of
the upgrade program in 1993. The increase in 1993 revenues compared with 1992
revenues reflects the delivery of two P-3 aircraft in 1993 compared to one in
1992, and higher S-3 upgrade sales offset by lower other programs and spares
sales.
Program profits in Aeronautical Systems in 1994 were nine percent higher
than 1993 reflecting the sales variances described above, improved performance
in C-130 programs and higher profit margins in special programs at LFWC offset
in part by a $25 million fine and civil settlement relating to charges contained
in a federal indictment (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements)
and higher spending on the development of an improved version of the C-130
aircraft (C-130J) than in 1993.
In addition, 1993 was significantly affected by the following third quarter
nonrecurring items. The company and the U.S. Navy settled their dispute relating
to the P-7A aircraft development program resulting in the reversal of
approximately $90 million of pretax losses recognized on this program in 1989.
Also, the company recorded a charge to program profits of $30 million resulting
from the closure of its wide-body commercial aircraft modification and
maintenance operation at Norton Air Force Base. Finally, the company recorded a
$35 million charge to program profits representing an excess of expected costs
over anticipated sales proceeds related to its Aeronautical Systems properties
in Burbank, California.
The program profits in 1993 were double the 1992 amount reflecting the LFWC
acquisition, sales variances described above, improved profit margins in most
areas, and the absence in 1993 of negative cost adjustments reflected in certain
programs in 1992, offset in part by lower profit in C-130 aircraft programs
reflecting fewer deliveries and a change in customer mix and higher spending on
the C-130J. Program profits for 1993 were also affected by the nonrecurring
items discussed above and intangible asset amortization of $84 million related
to the purchase of LFWC.
MISSILES AND SPACE SYSTEMS
Missiles and Space Systems sales continued to decline in 1994 following
declines experienced in 1993.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales
Space and other programs....................................... $2,049 $2,378 $2,655
Fleet ballistic missiles....................................... 1,093 1,281 1,503
Other missile systems.......................................... 466 579 429
------ ------ ------
Total....................................................... $3,608 $4,238 $4,587
====== ====== ======
Program profits.................................................. $ 266 $ 348 $ 401
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Revenues from space and other programs decreased 14 percent in 1994 and 10
percent in 1993 reflecting lower activity in various classified space programs
and lower revenues resulting from the termination of the Follow-on Early Warning
System program. Partially offsetting the 1993 sales decline were higher sales
from the Milstar military communications satellite program.
Trident II fleet ballistic missiles sales continued to decline in 1994
compared with 1993 reflecting decreased production contract requirements.
Trident II sales decreased in 1993 due to the completion of the development
portion of the program and transition to production.
13
<PAGE> 15
Other missile systems programs reflected lower sales in 1994 primarily due
to lower revenues resulting from the termination of the Advanced Solid Rocket
Motor program. Sales from other missile systems were higher in 1993 compared
with 1992 due to the Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) program.
Program profits in Missiles and Space Systems continued to decline in 1994
reflecting the decreased sales, a charge of $22 million related to the
cancellation and final settlement on the Mobile Satellite Antenna subcontract
and charges during 1994 totalling $43 million related to a military air command,
control and communication program for a foreign government. The declines and
charges were partially offset by performance incentives recognized in 1994 for
the Milstar, fleet ballistic missiles, and certain space systems programs.
The lower program profits in 1993 compared to 1992 also reflected the
impact of the lower sales volume as well as negative cost adjustments on several
programs and the absence in 1993 of significant amounts of reliability incentive
fees from the Trident II program recognized in 1992. The declines were partially
offset by higher operating profit margins in most other programs and the initial
recognition of profits related to the Iridium commercial satellite program.
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS
Sales in Electronic Systems were 18 percent and 8 percent higher in 1994
and 1993, respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales
Defense electronics programs................................... $ 588 $ 619 $ 622
Commercial product manufacturing............................... 498 388 413
Commercial distribution activities............................. 564 389 254
------ ------ ------
Total....................................................... $1,650 $1,396 $1,289
====== ====== ======
Program profits (loss)........................................... $ 47 $ (1) $ 32
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Defense electronics program revenues in 1994 were $31 million lower than
the $619 million reported in 1993, a five percent decrease. Decreased revenues
from countermeasures and antisubmarine warfare systems were partly offset by
increases in defense, information, and avionics systems. Revenues from defense
electronics in 1993 were approximately level with 1992 revenues reflecting
increases in countermeasures, information and avionics systems offset by
decreases in defense and surveillance systems programs.
Sales from commercial product manufacturing increased 28 percent in 1994
due to increased revenues from contract manufacturing activities. Sales from
commercial product manufacturing dipped six percent in 1993 primarily due to
weakness and competitive pricing pressures in the computer peripherals market.
Commercial distribution activities continued to grow in 1994 showing a 45
percent increase. Sales from this activity increased 53 percent in 1993 compared
to 1992. These increases reflect growth in the Access Graphics business.
Electronic Systems recognized a program profit of $47 million in 1994
compared to a slight program loss in 1993. The profit in 1994 reflects improved
performance in defense electronics programs and commercial product manufacturing
operations. The program loss in 1993 compared to a program profit in 1992 was
primarily due to significant operating losses at Calcomp due to market weakness
and pricing pressures as well as charges related to downsizing.
In addition, Electronic Systems program profits were negatively affected in
1993 when the company recognized an expense for future environmental remediation
costs that are expected to be allocated to the company's commercial business.
See Notes 1 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information on the company's accounting policies related to environmental
matters and the status of environmental matters now before the company.
14
<PAGE> 16
TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
Technology services sales decreased nine percent in 1994 following a 13
percent increase in 1993.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales
Space shuttle processing services.............................. $ 549 $ 609 $ 600
Engineering and scientific services............................ 287 335 349
State and municipal government services........................ 202 180 88
Other services................................................. 261 303 230
------ ------ ------
Total....................................................... $1,299 $1,427 $1,267
====== ====== ======
Program profits.................................................. $ 33 $ 32 $ 18
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Space shuttle processing revenues decreased ten percent in 1994. In 1993,
revenues were up approximately two percent. These variations reflect
fluctuations in levels of activity and cost reduction efforts in support of
space shuttle operations as NASA continues to review its budget, streamline
processes and vary the number of launches each year.
Sales from engineering and scientific services in 1994 and 1993 were down
from prior years. Decreases in support contracts for various NASA sites were
partly offset by increases in revenues from environmental services.
Revenues in 1994 from state and municipal government services were higher
compared to 1993 due to increased contract effort in children and family
services programs. Revenues from all other programs remained stable in 1994. In
1993, revenues in this line of business more than doubled due to expansion of
children and family services and transportation systems and services.
Other services revenues decreased approximately 14 percent in 1994
reflecting decreases in contract field support services and airport management.
Increases in 1993 reflected higher levels of contract field support services
provided to the military.
Program profits increased slightly in 1994. Program profits were positively
affected by improved performance in space shuttle processing services, contract
field support services, and various state and municipal government services.
Another positive factor was the commencement during the fourth quarter of 1994
of the environmental services management contract at the Idaho National
Engineering Laboratories (INEL). Program profits were negatively impacted by
higher business development costs at the company's Lockheed Air Terminal
subsidiary.
Program profits were substantially higher in 1993 compared to 1992
reflecting improved performance on contract field support programs and in
airport management and consulting operations, as well as a reduction in accrued
future retiree medical costs due to reduced employment levels.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIQUIDITY AND CASH FLOWS
Liquidity continued to be provided by cash generated from operating
activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $774 million and $795
million during 1994 and 1993, respectively. Both years primarily reflect
earnings plus depreciation and amortization, partly offset in 1994 by higher
working capital requirements.
At year end 1994, a portion of certain progress billings at LFWC that were
withheld by agreement with a U.S. government customer had been reduced to
approximately $94 million from approximately $167 million at year end 1993.
These billings are being withheld pending resolution of issues pertaining to
LFWC's manufacturing cost allocation system. The withheld amounts are expected
to be further reduced during 1995.
15
<PAGE> 17
Additions to property, plant, and equipment were $240 million in 1994,
compared to $321 million and $327 million in 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Depreciation expense (excluding amortization expense) was $299 million, $328
million, and $294 million for the three fiscal years ended 1994, 1993, and 1992.
The company continually monitors its capital spending in relation to current and
anticipated business needs. As circumstances dictate, facilities are added,
consolidated, disposed of, or modernized.
In the third quarter of 1994, the company disclosed that, as a part of its
downsizing activity and continuing review of property, plant, and equipment
requirements, it had been focusing attention on its Lockheed Missiles and Space
Company located predominately in Sunnyvale, California, and its commercial
aircraft maintenance facility at Tucson, Arizona. Although at that time no
action had been approved and no specific dollar effect could be reasonably
determined, management stated its belief that the net impact of a restructuring
charge at the Lockheed Missiles and Space Company would be in the range of $200
million before tax, absent any effect from the proposed Combination. In view of
the fact that the Combination was consummated on March 15, 1995, no further
decision to reorganize the Sunnyvale facilities has been made pending
consolidation plans of the combined company.
With respect to the Tucson facilities, management stated its belief that
the associated costs, if a decision were made to close the facility, would be
less than $40 million before tax. Improvements in the market for commercial
aircraft maintenance and the company's ability to sign up a number of new
contracts for the facility have caused management to view this facility as a
viable operation and integral to the continued success of the aircraft
maintenance line of business. Therefore, closure of this facility is not
currently being contemplated.
The company is holding and preparing for sale the excess property,
primarily in Burbank, California, resulting from a reorganization of its
Aeronautical Systems business in 1989. In view of changing market values for
real estate and uncertainty regarding the timing of availability of the
properties for sale, the sales value of the properties will continue to be
subject to change.
The cash inflow associated with the exercise of stock options in 1994
totalled $24 million compared to $71 million in 1993. The 1994 exercises
resulted in the issuance of approximately 500,000 shares of the company's stock.
Cash dividends amounted to $2.24, $2.12, and $2.09 per share in 1994, 1993,
and 1992, respectively.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Total debt, including the guarantee of salaried ESOP obligations, decreased
slightly to $2,539 million in 1994 from $2,596 million in 1993. Approximately
$277 million of long-term debt becomes due and payable in 1995.
Most of Lockheed's debt at the end of 1994 and 1993 was in the form of
publicly issued fixed-rate notes. Total debt including ESOP represented
approximately 47 percent and 52 percent of total capitalization at year-end 1994
and 1993, respectively. Total debt excluding ESOP (ex-ESOP) was 40 percent and
43 percent of total capitalization for the same respective periods. The
calculation of the debt ratio ex-ESOP reflects the fact that the assets of the
salaried ESOP trust, not reflected on the company's balance sheet, are available
for the service and repayment of the ESOP obligations guaranteed by the company.
The "net debt" ratio consists of total debt, net of cash, as a percentage
of total capitalization. Using this approach, the measures were 43 percent at
December 1994 and 50 percent at December 1993. Ex-ESOP, the amounts were 35
percent and 42 percent, respectively.
At December 25, 1994, the company had available a committed credit line
aggregating $1 billion from a group of domestic and foreign banks. Generally,
these lines are maintained to back up the company's commercial paper borrowings.
There were no commercial paper borrowings, nor any borrowings outstanding under
the committed lines, at year-end.
16
<PAGE> 18
The company receives advances on certain contracts and uses them to finance
the inventories required to complete the contracted work. The amount of such
advances in excess of costs incurred on these contracts was $448 million at
December 25, 1994, and was mostly related to contracts with foreign government
and commercial customers. These funds may be used for working capital
requirements and other general corporate purposes until needed to complete the
contracts.
Cash on hand and temporarily invested, internally generated funds, and
available financing resources are sufficient to meet anticipated operating and
debt service requirements and discretionary investment needs.
Stockholders' equity at December 25, 1994 was $2,807 million, up 15 percent
from the previous year-end. The increase reflects the retention of earnings in
excess of cash dividends paid, the issuance of new shares upon the exercise of
employee stock options, and accounting benefits related to the salaried ESOP
(the reduction of guaranteed debt and certain tax benefits).
OTHER MATTERS
COMPANY-SPONSORED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
In 1994, approximately $442 million was expended on company-sponsored
research and development, which is slightly less than the $449 million expended
in 1993. The amount in 1994 includes approximately $64 million spent on
development efforts for the next generation of the Hercules transport aircraft,
the C-130J. The company continually monitors its research and development effort
to assure an appropriate level of spending in relation to expected future
benefits. Company-sponsored research and development is necessary to support the
company's technologies and maintain its competitive position in the aerospace
and electronics industries.
BACKLOG
Funded backlog consists of unfilled firm orders for the company's products
for which funding has been both authorized and appropriated by the customer
(Congress, in the case of U.S. government customers). Negotiated (total) backlog
includes firm orders for which funding has not been appropriated.
The following table shows funded backlog by major category for the
company's two largest segments, and totals for the other two segments, at the
end of each of the last three years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------- ------- ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Aeronautical Systems
Fighter aircraft programs.................... $ 4,908 $ 6,229 $ 286
Airlift aircraft programs.................... 797 1,283 891
Aircraft modification and maintenance
programs.................................. 470 460 504
Other aircraft programs and support
activities................................ 1,350 1,361 1,599
------- ------- ------
7,525 9,333 3,280
Missiles and Space Systems
Fleet ballistic missiles..................... 1,580 1,423 2,389
Other missile systems........................ 157 90 317
Space and other programs..................... 1,765 1,273 1,605
------- ------- ------
3,502 2,786 4,311
Electronic Systems............................. 733 732 870
Technology Services............................ 405 305 395
------- ------- ------
$12,165 $13,156 $8,856
======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
Funded backlog was eight percent lower in 1994 compared to 1993. Decreases
in Aeronautical Systems programs were partially offset by increases in Missiles
and Space Systems and Technology Services programs.
17
<PAGE> 19
In 1993, funded backlog increased nearly 50 percent compared to 1992 due to
increases in Aeronautical Systems reflecting the acquisition of LFWC and its
existing backlog.
In Aeronautical Systems, funded backlog decreased 19 percent in 1994. The
fighter aircraft backlog decreased significantly, primarily reflecting
deliveries to the U.S. government without the addition of new U.S. government
orders. The decrease in the airlift aircraft backlog in 1994 is due to a
reduction in the number of aircraft ordered by the U.S. government. In 1994,
aircraft modification and maintenance and other aircraft program and support
activities remained stable compared to 1993. In 1993, the nearly-triple increase
in backlog was primarily attributable to the addition of LFWC's F-16 program and
its one-third share of the F-22 fighter program.
Although the funded backlog in Missiles and Space Systems increased 26
percent in 1994, it is 19 percent lower than the funded backlog at the end of
1992. Missiles and Space Systems programs continue to experience reductions in
funding and, in some cases, terminations by various government customers. Funded
backlog was lower at the end of 1993 reflecting delayed funding in several
programs. Delayed funding of the Trident II in 1993 was obtained in 1994 and is
reflected in the 1994 numbers. Other missile systems programs show an increase
primarily due to additional funding on the THAAD defensive missile development
program as that program nears its first flight test. Most of the other space
programs reflect moderate increases in funding in 1994 compared to 1993, the
most notable of which is the Milstar program.
In Electronic Systems, funded backlog in 1994 remained relatively constant
with the results from 1993. Moderate increases in the funded backlog for various
commercial electronic programs were offset by moderate decreases in various
defense electronics programs. Funded backlog for 1993 was 16 percent lower than
1992 reflecting decreases in defense electronics programs offset in part by
increases in commercial programs and surveillance systems and avionics programs.
The funded backlog for Technology Services increased approximately 33
percent in 1994 compared to 1993. The difference reflects increased funding for
various environmental programs plus higher NASA shuttle support and other
engineering support activities. The funding for contract field support services
remained the same in 1994. Funded backlog in 1993 was down from 1992 due to
lower backlog of contract field support services, and timing differences in NASA
funding of space shuttle processing and engineering and scientific support
activities.
The figures above do not include negotiated but unfunded amounts. Total
negotiated backlog, both funded and unfunded, amounted to $25.6 billion in 1994,
$28.9 billion in 1993, and $19.4 billion in 1992. The items affecting 1994
funded backlog discussed previously were also the primary reasons for the
decrease in the 1994 total negotiated backlog. The negotiated backlog increase
in 1993 was principally due to the addition of LFWC to the Aeronautical Systems
segment. Offsetting this increase were reductions in certain space programs in
the Missiles and Space Systems segment.
As in previous years, a substantial portion of unfunded backlog is related
to programs for the U.S. government and is dependent on future governmental
appropriations for funding.
DEFENSE INDUSTRY ENVIRONMENT
In recent years, significant changes in the global political climate have
redefined the needs of the Department of Defense (DOD). New requirements
emphasize a smaller, more technologically superior military, and the industrial
base to support it. In addition, initiatives to reduce the federal budget
deficit have placed increased downward pressure on defense budget levels.
Defense budgets have been declining in real terms (after accounting for
inflation) since 1985. Industry analysts continue to generally expect defense
spending to decline through the latter part of the decade and then hold constant
in real terms at a reduced level, but the ultimate outcome is uncertain. Reduced
budget levels, rapidly changing customer requirements, and increased competition
are expected for the defense industry in the years to come.
18
<PAGE> 20
The U.S. defense budget has a major impact on Lockheed's business base. In
1994, 64 percent of the company's sales were to DOD customers. The company
provides a wide variety of products and services, and Lockheed's major programs
have generally been well supported thus far during the budget decline. The
company is a leader in advanced technologies, research and development, and
limited production-rate manufacturing, all of which have been emphasized during
the ongoing debate over the focus of future defense spending. However,
uncertainty remains over the size and shape of future defense budgets and their
impact on specific programs.
The company has been focusing attention and resources on its most promising
businesses and opportunities in both defense and nondefense markets, and has
been reviewing its strategic options in light of the anticipated continuation of
decreases in military spending and the accelerated consolidation in the
aerospace/defense industry.
In defense markets, the company achieved significant milestones on the
C-130J airlift program and won an initial contract with the United Kingdom Royal
Air Force. Also, the company continues to demonstrate excellent performance on
U.S. government and foreign military programs such as the F-16, Trident II fleet
ballistic missile, and the Milstar communication satellite. Cost reduction
efforts and the continuous monitoring and adjustment of employment levels have
maintained the profitable position of these cornerstone product lines.
In nondefense markets, Lockheed has made significant progress in capturing
new business. The expanding commercial space market holds potential for new
business and is one in which Lockheed has initiated a presence through, among
others its joint venture relationship with Khrunichev Enterprise and NPO Energia
in Russia for space launch services, and its investment in Space Imaging
Incorporated for high resolution space-based photographs of the earth. Also, the
company made significant progress in the environmental lines of business with a
major contract award at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratories.
On March 15, 1995, the Combination of Lockheed and Martin was consummated.
The Combination was completed on a tax-free basis and without additional
financing. The Combination should reduce dependence on any single program and
the associated risks of program cancellations and is expected to offer
opportunities for improved efficiencies, to preserve critical elements of the
national defense industrial base of Lockheed, and to expand access to
commercial, civil, and international markets.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The company is involved in a number of proceedings and potential
proceedings relating to environmental matters. These matters and their impact on
the company are discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
As described in Note 10, a substantial portion of currently anticipated
environmental expenditures will be reflected in the company's sales and costs of
sales pursuant to U.S. government agreement or regulation. However, a timing
difference in cash flows is expected between incurrence of certain of the costs
related to the Burbank cleanup and allocation of these costs as part of the
company's general and administrative expense. At the end of 1994, expenditures
that had been made but not yet allocated amounted to approximately $80 million.
This timing difference is expected to increase through the end of 1995 before
declining in subsequent years.
19
<PAGE> 21
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------- ------- -------
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE
DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales
Aeronautical Systems........................................ $ 6,573 $ 6,010 $ 2,957
Missiles and Space Systems.................................. 3,608 4,238 4,587
Electronic Systems.......................................... 1,650 1,396 1,289
Technology Services......................................... 1,299 1,427 1,267
------- ------- -------
Total sales......................................... 13,130 13,071 10,100
Costs and expenses............................................ 12,275 12,227 9,456
------- ------- -------
Program profits
Aeronautical Systems........................................ 509 465 193
Missiles and Space Systems.................................. 266 348 401
Electronic Systems.......................................... 47 (1) 32
Technology Services......................................... 33 32 18
------- ------- -------
Total program profits............................... 855 844 644
Interest expense.............................................. (156) (168) (119)
Other income (deductions), net................................ (4) 24
------- ------- -------
Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle..................................... 695 676 549
Provision for income taxes.................................... 250 254 201
------- ------- -------
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle................................................... 445 422 348
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for
retiree medical benefits, net of tax........................ (631)
------- ------- -------
Net earnings (loss)......................................... $ 445 $ 422 $ (283)
======= ======= =======
Earnings per share
Before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle................................................ $ 7.00 $ 6.70 $ 5.65
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle......... (10.23)
------- ------- -------
Net earnings (loss) per share............................... $ 7.00 $ 6.70 $ (4.58)
======= ======= =======
Average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding................................................. 63.6 62.9 61.7
Number of common shares outstanding at year-end............... 63.2 62.7 61.1
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
20
<PAGE> 22
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
----- ------- -----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings (loss).............................................. $ 445 $ 422 $(283)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of
tax....................................................... 631
Depreciation and amortization............................... 485 498 355
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable....................................... (96) 232 (23)
Gross inventories......................................... 663 498 292
Accounts payable.......................................... 44 5 89
Salaries and related items................................ (21) (41) (31)
Income taxes.............................................. (95) 18 (15)
Customer advances and progress payments................... (746) (824) (238)
Other, net................................................ 95 (13) (192)
----- ------- -----
Net cash provided by operating activities................... 774 795 585
----- ------- -----
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property, plant, and equipment...................... (240) (321) (327)
Purchase of Lockheed Fort Worth Company.......................... (1,521)
Purchases of marketable securities............................... (200)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities..................... 210
Costs related to property held for sale.......................... (44) (26) (22)
Decrease (increase) in finance and other long-term receivables... 16 8 (11)
Other, net....................................................... (53) 41 (47)
----- ------- -----
Net cash used for investing activities...................... (321) (1,819) (397)
----- ------- -----
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Decrease in short-term borrowings................................ (7) (9) (2)
Borrowings of long-term debt..................................... 37 1,581 341
Repayments of long-term debt..................................... (61) (634) (294)
Purchases of treasury shares..................................... (101)
Cash dividends................................................... (141) (132) (128)
Proceeds from stock options exercised............................ 24 71 24
----- ------- -----
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities........ (148) 877 (160)
----- ------- -----
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents................. 305 (147) 28
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year..................... 147 294 266
----- ------- -----
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year........................... $ 452 $ 147 $ 294
===== ======= =====
Supplemental Disclosure Information
Cash paid during the year for
Interest.................................................... $ 152 $ 165 $ 101
Income taxes................................................ 378 230 219
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
21
<PAGE> 23
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993
------ ------
(DOLLAR FIGURES
IN
MILLIONS, EXCEPT
PER-SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents................................................ $ 452 $ 147
Accounts receivable...................................................... 1,732 1,644
Inventories.............................................................. 1,631 1,699
Deferred tax assets, net................................................. 123
Other current assets..................................................... 204 350
------ ------
Total current assets............................................. 4,142 3,840
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost
Land..................................................................... 94 93
Buildings, structures, and leasehold improvements........................ 1,611 1,686
Machinery and equipment.................................................. 2,641 2,812
------ ------
4,346 4,591
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization........................... 2,540 2,641
------ ------
Net property, plant, and equipment............................... 1,806 1,950
Noncurrent assets
Intangible assets related to tactical aircraft programs acquired (net of
accumulated amortization of $184 in 1994 and $84 in 1993)............. 1,326 1,425
Excess of purchase price over fair value of assets acquired (net of
accumulated amortization of $237 in 1994 and $204 in 1993)............ 757 782
Other noncurrent assets.................................................. 1,082 964
------ ------
$9,113 $8,961
====== ======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings.................................................... $ 14 $ 21
Accounts payable......................................................... 885 841
Salaries and related items............................................... 334 355
Deferred tax liabilities, net............................................ 44
Customers' advances in excess of related costs........................... 448 606
Current portion of long-term debt........................................ 277 28
Current portion of accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation........ 155 155
Other current liabilities................................................ 617 483
------ ------
Total current liabilities........................................ 2,730 2,533
Long-term debt............................................................. 2,248 2,547
Accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation............................. 893 942
Other long-term liabilities................................................ 435 496
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock..........................................................
Common stock, $1 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
73,007,724 shares issued (72,471,642 in 1993)......................... 73 73
Additional capital....................................................... 828 804
Retained earnings........................................................ 2,742 2,427
Treasury shares, at cost (9,775,996 shares).............................. (454) (454)
Guarantee of ESOP obligations............................................ (382) (407)
------ ------
Total stockholders' equity....................................... 2,807 2,443
------ ------
$9,113 $8,961
====== ======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
22
<PAGE> 24
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GUARANTEE
COMMON ADDITIONAL RETAINED TREASURY OF ESOP
STOCK CAPITAL EARNINGS SHARES OBLIGATIONS TOTAL
------ ---------- -------- -------- ----------- ------
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
At December 29, 1991..................... $70 $712 $2,526 $(353) $(452) $2,503
Earnings before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle...... 348 348
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of tax.... (631) (631)
Reduction of ESOP obligations
guaranteed.......................... 21 21
Tax benefits from dividends paid to
ESOP on unallocated shares.......... 6 6
Stock options exercised................ 1 23 24
Dividends declared on common stock
($2.09 per share)................... (128) (128)
Treasury shares purchased.............. (101) (101)
--- ---- ------ ----- ----- ------
At December 27, 1992..................... 71 735 2,121 (454) (431) 2,042
Net earnings........................... 422 422
Reduction of ESOP obligations
guaranteed.......................... 24 24
Tax benefits from dividends paid to
ESOP on unallocated shares and stock
options exercised................... 16 16
Stock options exercised................ 2 69 71
Dividends declared on common stock
($2.12 per share)................... (132) (132)
--- ---- ------ ----- ----- ------
At December 26, 1993..................... 73 804 2,427 (454) (407) 2,443
Net earnings........................... 445 445
Reduction of ESOP obligations
guaranteed.......................... 25 25
Tax benefits from dividends paid to
ESOP on unallocated shares and stock
options exercised................... 11 11
Stock options exercised................ 24 24
Dividends declared on common stock
($2.24 per share)................... (141) (141)
--- ---- ------ ----- ----- ------
At December 25, 1994..................... $73 $828 $2,742 $(454) $(382) $2,807
=== ==== ====== ===== ===== ======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
23
<PAGE> 25
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements for the
years ended December 25, 1994, December 26, 1993, and December 27, 1992, include
the accounts of wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. The accounts of
Lockheed Finance Corporation (LFC), a wholly owned finance company subsidiary,
are included in the consolidated financial statements. LFC's assets, revenues,
and earnings are immaterial and therefore not separately disclosed. Because
LFC's business differs significantly from the rest of Lockheed's operations,
LFC's results of operations are presented as a component of other income
(deductions), net.
Effective February 28, 1993, the company acquired Lockheed Fort Worth
Company (LFWC), formerly the tactical military aircraft business (Fort Worth
Division) of General Dynamics Corporation, for approximately $1.5 billion in
cash, plus the assumption of certain liabilities related to the business. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, and financed by intermediate and
long-term borrowings. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
the net assets acquired represented intangible assets related to the aircraft
programs acquired and amounted to approximately $1.5 billion. The operating
results of LFWC since February 28, 1993, are reported in the company's
Aeronautical Systems segment.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1993 and 1992 data to
conform to the 1994 presentation.
Cash and cash equivalents -- The company considers securities purchased
within three months of their date of maturity to be cash equivalents. Due to the
short maturity of these instruments, carrying value on the company's
consolidated balance sheet approximates fair value. Under Lockheed's cash
management system, certain divisions' and subsidiaries' cash accounts reflect
credit balances to the extent checks written have not been presented for
payment. The amounts of these credit balances included in accounts payable were
$171 million at December 25, 1994, and $154 million at December 26, 1993.
Inventories -- Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net
realizable value. In the case of materials and spare parts, cost represents
average cost.
Work-in-process inventory includes direct production costs, allocable
operating overhead, and, except for commercial contracts and programs, general
and administrative expenses.
Inventories are primarily attributable to long-term contracts or programs
on which the related operating cycles are longer than one year. In accordance
with industry practice, these inventories are included in current assets.
Property, plant, and equipment -- Depreciation is provided on most plant
and equipment using declining balance methods of depreciation during the first
half of the estimated useful lives of the assets; thereafter, straight-line
depreciation is used. Estimated useful lives generally range from eight years to
33 years for buildings and structures and two years to 20 years for machinery
and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the useful lives of the
related assets or the terms of the leases, whichever is shorter.
Intangible assets related to tactical aircraft programs
acquired -- Intangible assets related to the acquisition of LFWC are amortized
on a straight-line basis over an estimated period of benefit of fifteen years.
Excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired -- The
excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets of acquired businesses is
amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated periods of benefit. Such
periods do not exceed 40 years.
Sales and earnings -- Sales under cost-reimbursement-type contracts are
recorded as costs are incurred. Applicable estimated profits are included in
sales in the proportion that incurred costs bear to total estimated costs. Sales
and anticipated profits under certain fixed-price contracts that require
substantial performance over a long period of time before deliveries begin are
accounted for under the percentage-of-completion (cost-
24
<PAGE> 26
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
to-cost) method. Under all other contracts, sales are recorded at delivery or on
completion of specified tasks, as applicable, and estimated contract profits are
taken into earnings in proportion to recorded sales.
Some contracts include provisions for adjusting prices to reflect
specification changes and other matters. For accounting purposes, estimates of
such adjustments are used in recording sales and costs and expenses. Incentives
or penalties applicable to performance on contracts are considered in estimating
sales and profit rates and are recorded when there is sufficient information to
assess anticipated contract performance. When the adjustments are ultimately
determined, any changes from the estimates are reflected in earnings.
Any anticipated losses on contracts or programs are charged to earnings
when identified.
Research and development costs -- Company-sponsored research and
development costs (shown in Selected Financial Data on pages 2 and 3) primarily
include research and development and bid and proposal effort related to
government products and services. Except for certain arrangements described
below, these costs are generally included as part of the general and
administrative costs that are allocated among all contracts and programs under
U.S. government contractual arrangements. Company-sponsored product development
costs not otherwise allocable are charged to expense when incurred. Under
certain arrangements in which a customer shares in product development costs,
the company's portion of such costs is expensed as incurred. Customer-sponsored
research and development costs incurred pursuant to contracts are accounted for
as program costs.
Environmental matters -- The company records a liability for environmental
matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
can be reasonably estimated. A substantial portion of the costs are expected to
be reflected in sales and costs of sales pursuant to U.S. government agreement
or regulation. At the time a liability is recorded for future environmental
costs, an asset is recorded for the probable future recovery of the portion of
those costs in pricing U.S. government business. With the exception of
applicable amounts representing current assets and liabilities, these amounts
are included in other noncurrent assets and other long-term liabilities. The
portion of those costs expected to be allocated to commercial business is
reflected in cost of sales at the time the liability is established.
Earnings per share -- Earnings per share are computed from the weighted
average number of common shares, including common share equivalents, outstanding
during each year. In general, this computation assumes that dilutive stock
options were exercised and the resulting proceeds were used to purchase
outstanding common stock. When there is no material difference between the
computations of primary and fully diluted earnings per share, only the primary
number is presented.
NOTE 2 -- PROPOSED BUSINESS COMBINATION WITH MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION
On August 29, 1994 Lockheed and Martin Marietta Corporation (Martin
Marietta) entered into a definitive agreement to combine the two corporations
through an exchange of stock, whereby each share of Lockheed common stock will
be exchanged for 1.63 shares of common stock of a new company, Lockheed Martin
Corporation (Lockheed Martin). The combination is subject to government
antitrust review and on December 22, 1994, Lockheed, Martin Marietta, and
Lockheed Martin executed an Agreement Containing Consent Order (Consent Order)
with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) staff. On January 11, 1995, the FTC
announced it would not challenge the combination based upon the Consent Order,
which it provisionally accepted subject to final review at the end of a public
comment period. The combination is scheduled to be consummated in the first
quarter of 1995, subject to approval by the stockholders of Lockheed and Martin
Marietta.
25
<PAGE> 27
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The proposed business combination is expected to be accounted for as a
pooling of interests under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16, "Business
Combinations." Under this accounting method, the reported balance sheet amounts
and results of operations of Lockheed and Martin Marietta will be combined and
conformed, as appropriate, for the year in which the business combination occurs
as well as for all prior periods. The following presents unaudited pro forma
financial results for fiscal years 1994, 1993, and 1992 for Lockheed Martin
Corporation as if the business combination had occurred. The unaudited pro forma
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of actual or future results
of operations that would have occurred or will occur upon consummation of the
business combination and do not reflect any transaction expenses and
restructuring charges which may result from the business combination.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------- ------- -------
(UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT
PER-SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales..................................... $22,915 $22,376 $15,925
Earnings before cumulative effect of
accounting changes.......................... 1,061 865 678
Net earnings (loss)........................... 1,061 865 (382)
Net Earnings (loss) per common share:
Assuming no dilution:
Before cumulative effect of accounting
changes................................ 5.01 4.16 3.46
Net earnings (loss)...................... 5.01 4.16 (1.95)
Assuming full dilution:
Before cumulative effect of accounting
changes................................ 4.61 3.91 3.46
Net earnings (loss)...................... 4.61 3.91 (1.95)
</TABLE>
NOTE 3 -- OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS), NET
Other income (deductions), net consisted of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income....................................... $ 19 $ 14 $ 38
Earnings before income taxes of Lockheed Finance
Corporation......................................... 6 6
Other................................................. (23) (20) (20)
---- ---- ----
$ (4) $ $ 24
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
26
<PAGE> 28
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4 -- ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable consisted of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993
------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
U.S. government, primarily on long-term contracts.......... $ 556 $ 521
Commercial and foreign government
Long-term contracts...................................... 105 48
Other.................................................... 314 336
Unbilled costs and accrued profits, primarily related to
U.S. government and foreign government contracts......... 757 739
------ ------
$1,732 $1,644
====== ======
</TABLE>
Unbilled costs and accrued profits consisted primarily of revenues on
long-term contracts that had been recognized for accounting purposes but not yet
billed to customers. Of this total at December 25, 1994, it is expected that
approximately $661 million will be billed within 90 days. The remaining amount
of unbilled costs and accrued profits represent amounts related to Lockheed's
estimate of contract price adjustments that are expected to be billed and
collected on completion of negotiations.
NOTE 5 -- INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993
------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
Work in process, primarily on long-term contracts or
programs................................................. $2,737 $3,166
Materials and spare parts.................................. 254 310
Advances to subcontractors................................. 171 394
Finished goods............................................. 148 105
------ ------
3,310 3,975
Less customer advances and progress payments............... 1,679 2,276
------ ------
$1,631 $1,699
====== ======
</TABLE>
A substantial portion of inventories was applicable to U.S. government
contracts. Under contractual arrangements whereby Lockheed receives progress
payments from the U.S. government, title to inventories identified with the
related contracts is vested in the government.
Inventories do not include any significant amounts of unamortized tooling,
learning curve and other deferred costs, claims, or other similar items whose
recovery is uncertain.
An analysis of general and administrative costs follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------- ------ -----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Included in work in process-beginning of
period......................................... $ 372 $ 215 $ 186
Incurred during the year......................... 1,069 1,113 913
Charged to costs and expenses during the year.... (1,114) (956) (884)
------- ------ -----
Included in work in process-end of period........ $ 327 $ 372 $ 215
======= ====== =====
</TABLE>
Included in costs and expenses in 1994, 1993, and 1992, were general and
administrative costs of approximately $107 million, $110 million, and $102
million, respectively, incurred by business units whose sales were principally
not under government contracts.
27
<PAGE> 29
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6 -- INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
----- ---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current U.S. federal................................. $ 381 $ 83 $210
Foreign.............................................. 3 5 7
Deferred U.S. federal................................ (134) 166 (16)
----- ---- ----
$ 250 $254 $201
===== ==== ====
</TABLE>
All of the pretax earnings shown in the company's consolidated statement of
earnings were included in the computation of the provision for U.S. federal
income tax. For the approximate amounts of foreign pretax income, see Note 12.
Net provisions for state taxes on income are included in general and
administrative expenses which, as explained in Note 5, are primarily allocable
to government contracts. Such state taxes were $27 million in 1994, $30 million
in 1993, and $43 million in 1992.
The following is a reconciliation of the difference between the actual
provision for income taxes and the provision computed by applying the federal
statutory tax rate on earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Computed income taxes using statutory tax rate
(35% in 1994 and 1993, 34% in 1992)................. $243 $237 $187
Increases (reductions) from:
Amortization of purchase costs...................... 17 16 13
Revisions to prior years' estimated income tax
liabilities...................................... (15) 16 5
Other, net.......................................... 5 (15) (4)
---- ---- ----
$250 $254 $201
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109),
"Accounting for Income Taxes," deferred income tax assets and liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. SFAS 109 requires a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The company has no deferred tax
assets which require a valuation allowance.
28
<PAGE> 30
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 25, DECEMBER 26,
1994 1993
------------ ------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets related to:
Accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation... $367 $384
Accrued compensation and benefits................ 159 140
Other............................................ 30 14
---- ----
556 538
---- ----
Deferred tax liabilities related to:
Acquired intangible assets....................... 287 257
Contract costing methods......................... 67 170
Depreciation methods............................. 79 85
Debt settlement costs............................ 37
---- ----
433 549
---- ----
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)............ $123 $(11)
==== ====
</TABLE>
NOTE 7 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS
The company maintains contributory 401(k) savings plans for salaried
employees (the Salaried Plan) and hourly employees (the Hourly Plans) which
cover substantially all employees.
The Salaried Plan
In 1989, a leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) was created and
incorporated into the Salaried Plan. The ESOP purchased approximately 10.7
million shares of Lockheed stock with the proceeds from a $500 million note
issue which is guaranteed by Lockheed (see Note 9). These shares are held in a
suspense account in a salaried ESOP trust until allocated to participants as
described below.
Under provisions of the Salaried Plan, employees' eligible contributions
are matched by the company at a 60 percent rate. The company's matching
obligation is accounted for as compensation and was $103 million in 1994, $104
million in 1993, and $91 million in 1992. Since January 1992, one half of the
company match has consisted of cash contributions to employee-selected
investment options (including Lockheed stock) and one half of the company match
has consisted of Lockheed stock. The Lockheed stock portion of the matching
obligation is fulfilled, in part, with stock allocated from the suspense account
(approximately 710,000 shares per year based upon the debt repayment schedule)
through the year 2004. The balance of the stock portion of the matching
obligation is fulfilled through purchases of Lockheed stock from retiring
participants or on the open market. Approximately 3,000, 77,000, and 184,000
shares of Lockheed stock were purchased on the open market by the salaried ESOP
trust in 1994, 1993, and 1992, respectively. The salaried ESOP trust also sold
on the open market approximately 519,000, 110,000 and 285,000 shares purchased
from retirees in 1994, 1993, and 1992, respectively.
Company payments to the salaried ESOP trust for the stock portion of the
matching obligation consist of dividends on the unallocated shares, and an
amount sufficient to fully service the ESOP debt and meet the company's matching
obligation to employees that is not otherwise covered through the allocation of
suspense account shares.
29
<PAGE> 31
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In 1994 and 1993, compensation expense accrued and dividends on unallocated
shares exceeded the amount required to fully service the ESOP debt and fulfill
the company's matching obligation by approximately $4 million and $2 million,
respectively. These amounts were recognized as additions to the company's other
income (deductions), net. In 1992, the company paid an amount in excess of
compensation expense accrued and dividends on unallocated shares. These
additional payments were recognized as additions to Lockheed's interest expense.
The amount varied in each year due to changes in the market value of company
stock allocated from the suspense account. The impact of the ESOP on the company
also includes special tax benefits on dividends paid on allocated and
unallocated ESOP shares. These various items are reflected in components of the
company's consolidated statement of earnings or as direct increases to the
company's retained earnings. The aggregate of these items resulted in a net
favorable effect to the company of about $15 million, $12 million, and $6
million in 1994, 1993, and 1992, respectively.
The salaried ESOP trust requirements and the company's payments are shown
in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ESOP trust requirements:
Debt service (including interest of $33 million in
1994, $35 million in 1993, and $38 million in
1992).............................................. $59 $59 $59
Purchase of additional shares (required to meet
company matching obligation)....................... 4 8 12
--- --- ---
$63 $67 $71
=== === ===
Met by:
Dividends on unallocated shares....................... $16 $17 $18
Company matching funds (Lockheed stock portion)....... 51 52 45
Amounts recognized as additions to Lockheed's interest
expense (other income)............................. (4) (2) 8
---- --- ---
$63 $67 $71
=== === ===
</TABLE>
The Hourly Plans
In 1990, ESOPs were created and incorporated into the Hourly Plans. The
company matches 60 percent of a participating employee's eligible contribution
to the Hourly Plans through payments to an ESOP trust. The company's match
consists of Lockheed stock purchased by the ESOPs on the open market and from
retiring participants. The company's required match, which is reported as
compensation, was $12 million in 1994, $15 million in 1993, and $16 million in
1992. Approximately 81,000, 123,000, and 311,000 shares were purchased on the
open market to provide the company match in 1994, 1993, and 1992, respectively.
In 1994, the hourly ESOP trust sold on the open market approximately 51,000
shares purchased from retirees.
ESOP Ownership of the Company's Stock
The salaried and hourly ESOP trusts held approximately 15 million issued
and outstanding shares of the company's stock at December 25, 1994, and
approximately 16 million shares at December 26, 1993 and December 27, 1992,
representing about 24 percent, 26 percent, and 26 percent of the total shares
outstanding, respectively. The 15 million shares held at December 25, 1994
consisted of approximately 8 million allocated shares and 7 million unallocated
shares, including an insignificant number of unallocated shares committed to be
allocated after year-end. For earnings per share calculations, all shares held
by the ESOP trusts are included as outstanding shares.
30
<PAGE> 32
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Dividends on Allocated Shares
Dividends paid to the salaried and hourly ESOP trusts on the allocated
shares are paid by check annually by the ESOP trusts to the participants based
upon the number of shares allocated to each participant.
DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS
Most employees are covered by Lockheed-sponsored contributory or
noncontributory defined benefit pension plans. Normal retirement age is 65, but
provision is made for earlier retirement. Benefits for salaried plans are
generally based on salary and years of service, while those for hourly plans are
based on negotiated benefits and years of service. Substantially all benefits
are paid from funds previously provided to trustees. Lockheed's funding policy
is to make contributions that are consistent with U.S. government cost
allowability and Internal Revenue Service deductibility requirements, subject to
the full-funding limits of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA). When any Lockheed funded plan exceeds the full-funding limits of ERISA,
no contribution is made to that plan.
In addition, Lockheed has certain supplemental retirement and other benefit
plans which are not material. During 1994, Lockheed established a trust intended
to be used for payment of these benefits. Benefits paid by the trust on
Lockheed's behalf are charged against liabilities previously accrued. The assets
held by the trust do not qualify as plan assets under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 87 (SFAS 87) and the plans continue to be unfunded for
purposes of ERISA.
Net pension cost for 1994, 1993 and 1992, as determined by SFAS 87, was
$118 million, $110 million, and $76 million, respectively, as shown in the
following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
----- ----- -----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost -- benefits earned during the
period........................................... $ 245 $ 221 $ 176
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation...... 531 534 439
Actual return on plan assets....................... 78 (856) (358)
Net amortization and deferral...................... (733) 214 (178)
Employee contributions............................. (3) (3) (3)
----- ----- -----
$ 118 $ 110 $ 76
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE> 33
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The increase in net pension cost in 1993 from 1992 reflects costs
associated with the assumed obligations related to the Fort Worth Division of
General Dynamics.
An analysis of the status of the plans follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 25, DECEMBER 26,
1994 1993
------------ ------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
Plan assets, at fair value...................... $7,819 $8,322
====== ======
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations
Vested benefits............................... $6,065 $6,696
Nonvested benefits............................ 65 77
------ ------
Accumulated benefit obligation.................. 6,130 6,773
Effect of projected future salary increases..... 586 844
------ ------
Projected benefit obligation.................... 6,716 7,617
------ ------
Plan assets in excess of projected benefit
obligation.................................... $1,103 $ 705
====== ======
Consisting of:
Unrecognized net asset existing at the date of
initial application of SFAS 87............. $ 336 $ 422
Unrecognized prior service cost............... (227) (242)
Unrecognized net gain......................... 846 308
Prepaid pension expense....................... 148 217
------ ------
$1,103 $ 705
====== ======
</TABLE>
At December 25, 1994 and December 26, 1993, approximately 49 percent and 48
percent, respectively, of the plan assets were equity securities and the rest
were primarily fixed income securities. The actuarial determinations were based
on various assumptions as illustrated in the following table. Net pension costs
in 1994, 1993, and 1992 were based on assumptions in effect at the end of the
respective preceding year-end. Benefit obligations as of each year-end were
based on assumptions in effect as of those dates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Discount rate on benefit obligations................ 8.5% 7.0% 8.0%
Average of full-career compensation increases for
those employees whose benefits are affected by
compensation levels............................... 6.0% 6.0% 7.0%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.... 8.0% 8.0% 8.0%
</TABLE>
As required by SFAS 87, the projected benefit obligation includes the
effect of projected future salary increases, but not the effect of projected
future credited service. The excess of plan assets over the projected benefit
obligation will be required to fund the plans' continuing benefit obligations
that will result from, among other things, future credited service. The change
in this excess in 1994 from 1993 resulted from a decrease in the accumulated
benefit obligation primarily due to the higher discount rate, offset, in part,
by benefit payments in 1994.
The company has no present intention of terminating any of its pension
plans. However, if a qualified defined benefit pension plan is terminated, the
company would be required to vest all participants and purchase annuities with
plan assets to meet the accumulated benefit obligation for such participants. At
December 25, 1994, the cost to purchase annuities to satisfy the accumulated
benefit obligation of Lockheed's qualified defined benefit plans would be in
excess of $7.9 billion, compared to the $6.1 billion of accumulated benefit
obligation reflected on the first table above. The main salaried retirement plan
provides that, after satisfaction of the accumulated benefit obligation and
payment of federal excise taxes and federal and state
32
<PAGE> 34
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
income taxes, any remaining plan assets would, in the event of plan termination
within five years following a change in control of the company, be transferred
to a trust and applied to the payment of certain other employee benefits
otherwise payable to employees and retirees (e.g. retiree medical benefits). To
the extent that contributions to a defined benefit plan were reimbursed under
U.S. government contracts, any remaining surplus amounts at the time of plan
termination are subject to equitable sharing under an agreement with the
government.
RETIREE MEDICAL PLANS
Lockheed currently provides medical benefits under a contributory group
medical plan for certain early (pre-65) retirees and under a noncontributory
group Medicare supplement plan for certain retirees aged 65 and over (post-65).
Under the accrual accounting methods of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 106 (SFAS 106), "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other Than Pensions," the present value of the actuarially determined expected
future cost of providing medical benefits is attributed to each year of employee
service. The service and interest cost recognized each year is added to the
accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation.
Net retiree medical benefit costs as determined under SFAS 106 are shown in
the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost -- benefits accrued during the year...... $ 24 $ 24 $ 18
Interest cost on accumulated retiree medical benefit
obligation.......................................... 81 84 76
Actual return on plan assets.......................... (1) (5) (2)
Net amortization and deferral......................... (13) (1) (1)
---- ---- ----
$ 91 $102 $ 91
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
The 1993 net retiree medical benefit costs reflect the assumption of
benefit obligations for certain employees and retirees of the former Fort Worth
Division of General Dynamics Corporation.
Lockheed has implemented funding approaches to help manage future retiree
medical costs. A Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust was
established and began receiving funding in 1991, and other trusts established
under Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regulations began receiving funding in
1992. At December 25, 1994, these trusts held $149 million in assets, of which
49 and 52 percent respectively in 1994 and 1993 were equity securities and the
rest were primarily fixed income securities. The funded amounts are allowable
under government contracts in the pricing of the company's products and services
and are deductible in the year of contribution under IRS regulations. Earnings
on trust assets operate as a reduction to annual SFAS 106 costs.
Upon adopting SFAS 106 effective the beginning of fiscal 1992, Lockheed
elected to record the transition obligation (present value of future retiree
medical benefits attributed to years prior to 1992) on the immediate recognition
basis. This resulted in a charge to 1992 earnings for the cumulative effect of
the accounting change of $631 million, or $10.23 per share, after recognition of
the deferred tax benefit of $325 million associated with this transition
obligation.
33
<PAGE> 35
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Under SFAS 106, actual medical benefit payments to retirees reduce
Lockheed's accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation, and any trust funding
reduces the unfunded portion of this obligation on the company's consolidated
balance sheet. An analysis of the status of the retiree medical benefit plans
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 25, DECEMBER 26,
1994 1993
------------ ------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
Plan assets at fair value.......................... $ 149 $ 113
====== ======
Actuarial present value of benefit obligation:
Retirees......................................... $ 790 $ 726
Employees eligible to retire..................... 171 233
Employees not eligible to retire................. 209 309
------ ------
Accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation..... 1,170 1,268
Unrecognized net loss.............................. (6) (58)
Unrecognized prior service cost.................... 51
------ ------
Net unfunded retiree medical benefit obligation.... $1,066 $1,097
====== ======
</TABLE>
Actuarial determinations were based on various assumptions as illustrated
in the following table. Net retiree medical costs for 1994, 1993, and 1992 were
based on assumptions in effect at the end of the respective preceding years.
Benefit obligations as of the end of each year reflect assumptions in effect as
of those dates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Discount rate.......................................... 8.5% 7.0% 8.25%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets....... 8.0% 8.0% 8.0%
Range of medical trend rates:
Initial:
pre-65 retirees................................... 11.0% 13.0% 13.0%
post-65 retirees.................................. 6.0% 9.0% 10.0%
Ultimate (20 years and after):
pre-65 retirees................................... 5.0% 5.0% 6.0%
post-65 retirees.................................. 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
</TABLE>
An increase of one percentage point in the assumed medical trend rates
would result in an accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation of $1.3
billion at December 25, 1994, and a 1994 net retiree medical benefit cost of
approximately $94 million. The company believes that the cost containment
features it has previously adopted and the funding approaches under way will
allow it to effectively manage its retiree medical expenses, but it will
continue to monitor the costs of retiree medical benefits and may further modify
the plans if circumstances warrant.
The decline in the accumulated retiree medical benefit obligation from 1993
to 1994 was primarily due to the higher discount rate at year-end 1994, offset,
in part, by the effect of earlier than expected retirements.
POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
In November 1992, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 112 (SFAS 112), "Employers' Accounting for
Postemployment Benefits." This statement establishes standards for accounting
for benefits to former or inactive employees after employment, other than
retirement benefits. Lockheed's adoption of SFAS 112 in 1994 did not have a
significant effect on the company's financial statements.
34
<PAGE> 36
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 8 -- LEASES
Total rental expenses under operating leases, net of immaterial amounts of
sublease rentals and contingent rentals, were $99 million, $112 million, and
$114 million for 1994, 1993, and 1992, respectively.
Future minimum lease commitments at December 25, 1994, for all operating
leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $422 million ($83
million in 1995, $71 million in 1996, $54 million in 1997, $49 million in 1998,
$44 million in 1999, and $121 million in later years).
Substantially all real estate leases contain renewal options ranging from
one year to 10 years. Certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished
by the U.S. government under short-term or cancelable arrangements.
NOTE 9 -- DEBT
At December 25, 1994, the company had a loan agreement (the 1994 Agreement)
with a group of domestic and foreign banks. The agreement makes available $1
billion through September 15, 1999. The primary purpose of the agreement is to
back up the company's commercial paper borrowings. There were no borrowings
outstanding under the 1994 Agreement and no commercial paper borrowings
outstanding, at December 25, 1994.
Borrowings under the 1994 Agreement would be unsecured and bear interest,
at the company's option, at rates based on the Eurodollar rate or a bank base
rate (as defined). The 1994 Agreement contains financial covenants relating to
equity and debt, and provisions which relate to certain changes in control. In
conjunction with the completion of the proposed business combination with Martin
Marietta, the 1994 Agreement will be terminated and replaced with a new credit
facility for the Lockheed Martin Corporation.
Long-term debt consisted of the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993
------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
Variable-rate notes due 1995.............................. $ 200 $ 200
Fixed-rate notes due 1995 to 2004......................... 140 140
4 7/8% notes due 1996..................................... 275 275
5.65% notes due 1997...................................... 100 100
5 7/8% notes due 1998..................................... 300 300
9 3/8% notes due 1999..................................... 300 300
6 3/4% notes due 2003..................................... 300 300
9% notes due 2022......................................... 200 200
7 7/8% notes due 2023..................................... 300 300
Obligations under long-term capital leases................ 16 17
Other obligations......................................... 12 36
------ ------
2,143 2,168
Guarantee of ESOP obligations............................. 382 407
------ ------
2,525 2,575
Less portion due within one year.......................... 277 28
------ ------
$2,248 $2,547
====== ======
</TABLE>
All of the notes contain covenants relating to debt, and provisions which
relate to certain changes in control. The company will take necessary actions to
ensure that the proposed business combination with Martin Marietta does not
violate provisions related to changes in control.
35
<PAGE> 37
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The 9 3/8% notes due in 1999 stipulate that, in the event of both a
"designated event" and a related "rating decline" occurring within a specified
period of time, holders of the notes may require Lockheed to redeem the notes
and pay accrued interest. In general, a "designated event" occurs when any one
of certain ownership, control, or capitalization changes takes place. A "rating
decline" occurs when the ratings assigned to Lockheed debt are reduced below
investment-grade levels.
The variable-rate notes due in 1995 are unsecured and bear interest at
rates based on the Eurodollar rate.
The fixed-rate notes due in 1995 to 2004 are unsecured, were issued in
various denominations with various maturity dates, and bear interest at fixed
rates ranging from 4.55 percent to 8.34 percent.
Lockheed's leveraged ESOP (see Note 7) borrowed $500 million through a
private placement of notes in 1989. These notes bear interest at fixed rates
ranging from 8.27 percent to 8.41 percent, and are being repaid in quarterly
installments over terms ending in 2004. The ESOP note agreement stipulates that,
in the event that the ratings assigned to Lockheed's long-term senior unsecured
debt are below investment grade, holders of the notes may require Lockheed to
purchase the notes and pay accrued interest. These notes are obligations of the
ESOP but guaranteed by Lockheed and, in accordance with financial accounting
standards, are reported as debt on Lockheed's balance sheet, with a
corresponding offset to stockholders' equity. As the ESOP notes are repaid, the
amount guaranteed decreases, as do the amounts reported as Lockheed debt and
offsetting stockholders' equity. While the amount guaranteed affects Lockheed's
consolidated balance sheet, the issuance of the guarantee and the subsequent
reductions in its amount were not cash transactions and, accordingly, are not
reflected on the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Lockheed Finance Corporation (LFC) has a $155 million line of credit with a
group of banks. The agreement limits borrowings to an amount reduced by the
balance outstanding ($37 million at December 25, 1994) of LFC notes and leases
receivable sold to the banks with certain recourse provisions.
The company's long-term debt maturities, including those of LFC and the
guaranteed ESOP obligations, for the five years following December 25, 1994,
are: $277 million in 1995; $307 million in 1996; $162 million in 1997; $374
million in 1998; and $350 million in 1999.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments" and No. 119, "Disclosure about Derivative
Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments," require the
disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and
liabilities recognized and not recognized on the consolidated balance sheet, for
which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Unless otherwise indicated
elsewhere in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying
value of the company's financial instruments approximates fair value. The
estimated fair values of the company's long-term debt instruments at December
25, 1994, aggregated $2,491 million, compared with a carrying amount of $2,525
million on the consolidated balance sheet. The fair values were estimated based
on quoted market prices for those instruments publicly traded. For privately
placed debt, the fair values were estimated based on the quoted market prices
for the same or similar issues, or on current rates offered to the company for
debt of the same remaining maturities.
NOTE 10 -- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters -- In March 1991, the company entered into a consent
decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relating to certain
property in Burbank, California, which obligates the company to design and
construct facilities to monitor, extract, and treat groundwater and operate and
maintain such facilities for approximately eight years. The company currently
estimates that expenditures required to comply with the terms of the consent
decree over the remaining term of the project will be approximately $90 million.
36
<PAGE> 38
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The company has also been operating under a cleanup and abatement order
from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board affecting its
facilities in Burbank, California. This order requires site assessment and
action to abate groundwater contamination by a combination of groundwater and
soil cleanup and treatment. Based on experience being derived from initial
remediation activities, the company currently estimates the anticipated costs of
these actions in excess of the requirements under the EPA consent decree to
approximate $155 million over the remaining term of the project; however, this
estimate will be subject to changes as work progresses and as additional
experience is gained.
The company is also involved in several other proceedings and potential
proceedings relating to environmental matters, including disposal of hazardous
wastes and soil and water contamination. The company has not incurred any
material costs relating to the environmental matters. The extent of the
company's financial exposure cannot in all cases be reasonably estimated at this
time. A liability of approximately $65 million for those cases in which an
estimate of financial exposure can be determined has been recorded.
Under an agreement with the U.S. government, the Burbank groundwater
treatment and soil remediation expenditures are being allocated to all of the
company's operations as general and administrative costs (see Note 1), and under
existing government regulations these and other environmental expenditures
related to U.S. government business, after deducting any recoveries from
insurance or other responsible parties, are allowable in establishing the prices
of the company's products and services. As a result, a substantial portion of
the expenditures will be reflected in the company's sales and costs of sales
pursuant to U.S. government agreement or regulation. The company has recorded a
liability for probable future environmental costs as discussed above, and has
recorded an asset for probable future recovery of the portion of these costs in
pricing of the company's products and services for U.S. government business. The
portion that is expected to be allocated to commercial business has been
reflected in cost of sales. The recorded amounts do not reflect the possible
recovery of portions of the environmental costs through insurance policy
coverage or from other potentially responsible parties to the contamination,
which Lockheed is pursuing as required by agreement and U.S. government
regulation. Any such recoveries, when received, would reduce the company's
liability as well as the allocated amounts to be included in the company's U.S.
government sales and cost of sales.
Other Matters -- Lockheed and its directors are defendants in five class
action lawsuits related to the company's proposed business combination with
Martin Marietta Corporation. The plaintiffs' complaints include allegations that
the company's directors breached fiduciary duties to the company's shareholders
by approving the business combination and claims relating to Lockheed's plea
agreement (described below) and payment of $24.8 million in fines and civil
settlements to the United States in that action. An oral agreement in principle
was reached with counsel for the plaintiffs on January 30, 1995 with respect to
the terms of a proposed settlement of all claims in these lawsuits.
The agreement in principle, which is subject to the execution and delivery
of a mutually-satisfactory stipulation of settlement (Stipulation), contemplates
a settlement subject to Court approval involving the following elements: (a)
Lockheed Martin would agree, subject to any restrictions imposed by Maryland
law, to pay a regular quarterly dividend of $0.40 (rather than $0.35, as
otherwise contemplated) per share on each outstanding share of Lockheed Martin
Common Stock for each of the first three quarters after consummation of the
business combination and approval of the settlement in which net income
(excluding non-recurring restructure costs and extraordinary charges and
transaction expenses) is sufficient to pay such a dividend; (b) the provisions
of Section 6.7 of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated August 29,
1994, among Lockheed Martin, Martin Marietta, and Lockheed (Reorganization
Agreement) would be amended to permit either Lockheed or Martin Marietta to
initiate discussions with third parties regarding business combination
transactions if either company's Board of Directors, upon written advice of
counsel, has determined that it is in the best interests of such company's
stockholders to initiate such discussions; (c) the termination fee specified in
Section 8.2 of the Reorganization Agreement would be reduced from $100 million
to $50 million; (d) the
37
<PAGE> 39
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus related to the business combination would
reflect certain additional disclosures proposed by counsel for plaintiffs; (e)
in part as a result of the pendency of the plaintiffs' actions, Lockheed would
agree to strengthen its policies and procedures to help to insure compliance
with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; and (f) Lockheed Martin would agree to
the payment of $6 million in counsel fees and expenses to plaintiffs' counsel
with interest from the date plaintiffs' counsel delivers to defendants' counsel
a draft of the Stipulation.
It is contemplated that the proposed settlement will be expressly
conditioned upon (i) the business combination being consummated substantially on
the terms set forth in the Reorganization Agreement, (ii) Lockheed and Martin
Marietta receiving evidence satisfactory to them that the provisions of the
proposed settlement will not result in the pooling of interests method of
accounting for the business combination being unavailable under the requirements
of APB No. 16; (iii) certification of the stockholder classes (for the purpose
of obtaining approval of the Stipulation and entry of an appropriate judgment);
(iv) court approval of the Stipulation; and (v) final dismissal of the actions
with prejudice and release of the claims asserted in such actions with
prejudice. On February 7, 1995, Lockheed, Martin Marietta, and Lockheed Martin
made the amendments to Sections 6.7 and 8.2 of the Reorganization Agreement
contemplated by the terms of the proposed settlement.
Lockheed and the Lockheed directors have denied, and continue to deny, that
they have committed any violations of law, and they have agreed in principle to
the proposed settlement in order to eliminate the burden and expense of further
litigation and to facilitate the consummation of a transaction that they believe
to be in the best interests of the stockholders of Lockheed. If the proposed
settlement described above is not consummated, Lockheed and the Lockheed
directors intend to contest the claims asserted against them in these lawsuits.
On June 22, 1994, an indictment was returned by a federal grand jury
sitting in Atlanta, Georgia, against Lockheed and two of its employees. The
indictment charged that Lockheed and the two employees, one of whom was a
regional vice president of one of Lockheed's subsidiaries and the other a
divisional director of sales for the Middle East and North Africa, violated the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), conspired to violate the FCPA, conspired
to commit wire fraud, and impaired and impeded agencies of the United States
Department of Defense. The indictment related to allegations that Lockheed
retained a sales and marketing consultant in Egypt who was a member of the
Egyptian Parliament, and that the consultant received retainer payments and a $1
million contract termination payment in connection with the sale by Lockheed of
three C-130 Hercules Aircraft, in violation of the FCPA.
By letter dated August 18, 1994, the Acting Assistant Secretary, Department
of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (State Department) advised
Lockheed that it would be the State Department's policy prospectively to deny
defense-related export privileges to Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company
(LASC), a division of Lockheed. The State Department, referring to Sections 38,
39 and 42 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. Sections 2778, 2779 and
2791) announced that its action arose from the June 22, 1994, indictment
discussed above. The State Department announced that its action is confined to
LASC and does not affect any other divisions or subsidiaries of Lockheed,
although it is possible that the State Department could expand its action in the
future to cover Lockheed or other divisions of Lockheed or Lockheed Martin or
any of its divisions. Moreover, the State Department announced that the action
does not apply to any approvals granted to LASC's programs before June 22, 1994,
but rather to future export license applications. Lockheed may seek exceptions
to the announced policy on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the State
Department, Office of Defense Controls, which must consider United States
foreign policy and national security interests, as well as law enforcement
concerns. There is no stated time frame within which the State Department must
review an exception request. Lockheed has submitted written exception requests
on several major aircraft programs. The State Department has granted these
requests in a timely manner consistent with Lockheed's business plans, with no
request pending for more than ninety days. There can be no
38
<PAGE> 40
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
assurances as to how long the State Department will take to review any future
exception requests or whether any other exceptions will be granted.
On January 27, 1995, Lockheed and the United States of America entered into
a plea agreement pursuant to which Lockheed agreed to plead guilty to one count
of conspiring to violate the bribery provisions of the FCPA and conspiring to
falsify its books, records and accounts. All other counts of the indictment
referred to above were dismissed. To the knowledge of Lockheed, no directors or
executive officers of Lockheed have been or will be indicted in connection with
this matter. Lockheed agreed to pay the U.S. Government $24.8 million, which was
reflected as a charge against earnings in the fourth quarter of 1994, consisting
of a fine of $21.8 million and a civil settlement of $3 million. The United
States Attorney's Office stated that Lockheed fully cooperated in its efforts to
gather documents and in making witnesses available during the course of the
investigation. The plea agreement does not preclude the possibility that the
Department of Defense, the State Department, or the Securities and Exchange
Commission may take further action against Lockheed or Lockheed Martin or any of
their divisions as a result of Lockheed's guilty plea, which could include the
possibility of suspension or debarment from future government contracting.
Lockheed is cooperating with these regulatory agencies to satisfy their
concerns. Lockheed is also in the process of reviewing its relationships with
all sales and marketing international consultants to assure compliance with its
policies.
Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Lockheed, is a
defendant in a civil suit in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California brought under the so-called qui tam provisions of the
Civil False Claims Act, which permit an individual to bring suit in the name of
the government and share in any recovery received. The suit, captioned United
States ex rel. Margaret A. Newsham and Martin Overbeek Bloem v. Lockheed
Missiles and Space Company, Inc., was filed in 1988. The complaint sets forth
numerous allegations of improper conduct by Lockheed and seeks unspecified
damages. The Department of Justice conducted a thorough investigation of the
matter after the complaint was filed and has declined to intervene in the case.
It is entirely possible that some of the issues being pursued by plaintiffs will
be tried to a jury. However, the company believes the litigation to be without
merit and intends to aggressively defend its position.
A number of other lawsuits and administrative proceedings are pending
against the company and its subsidiaries. Management believes the lawsuits and
administrative proceedings are either without merit or if decided adversely,
would be covered by insurance or by contract or would not be of material
significance.
The company has entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other
arrangements with financial institutions primarily relating to the guarantee of
future performance on certain contracts. At December 25, 1994, the company was
contingently liable on outstanding letters of credit, guarantees, and other
arrangements aggregating approximately $434 million.
Lockheed Finance Corporation (LFC) sold certain finance notes and leases
receivable with certain recourse provisions in previous years. At December 25,
1994, the unpaid principal balance of these notes and leases was about $30
million.
At December 25, 1994, LFC had entered into approximately $320 million in
interest rate swap agreements to reduce the impact of changes in interest rates
on its operations. The effect of these agreements is that the aggregate of the
carrying value of LFC's financial instruments approximates their fair market
value. LFC is exposed to credit loss, to the extent of future interest rate
differentials, in the event of nonperformance by the intermediaries to the
interest rate swap agreements. The company does not anticipate nonperformance by
the intermediaries.
39
<PAGE> 41
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 11 -- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND RELATED ITEMS
EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS
Lockheed's 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Program (1992 Program) authorizes
grants of options to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of the company's authorized
but unissued common stock. Options granted under the 1992 Program and its
predecessors, the 1986 Program and the 1982 Program, can be exercised at a price
not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date that the option is
granted. At December 25, 1994, 2,894,920 shares of the company's common stock
were reserved for stock options granted.
The 1992 Program is composed of two separate stock option plans. The first
plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options. The second plan provides
for the grant of nonstatutory stock options that may, at the discretion of the
board of directors, be accompanied by stock appreciation rights.
The following table summarizes the options exercisable and available for
grant at December 25, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXERCISABLE
-------------------------- AVAILABLE
NUMBER PRICE RANGE FOR GRANT
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1992 Program........................... 710,300 $42.75-58.81 1,239,150
1986 Program........................... 1,192,383 31.94-55.31
1982 Program........................... 107,987 46.00-47.50
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes the activity under the company's plans
during 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTION SHARES
PRICE RANGE UNDER OPTION
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at December 26, 1993.................. $31.94-58.81 2,856,770
Granted......................................... 63.19-64.81 640,500
Terminated...................................... 58.31-64.81 (58,150)
Exercised....................................... 36.63-58.81 (544,200)
---------
Outstanding at December 25, 1994.................. 31.94-64.81 2,894,920
=========
</TABLE>
PREFERRED STOCK
There are 2,500,000 shares of preferred stock, $1 par value, authorized for
issuance. At December 25, 1994, there was no preferred stock outstanding and
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock were reserved for issuance in connection
with the rights described below.
In December 1986, Lockheed adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and
distributed a dividend of one right for each outstanding share of common stock.
Upon becoming exercisable, each right entitles the holder to purchase one
one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred stock
(Series A Preferred), par value $1, at a price of $150, which is subject to
adjustment. Shares of common stock issued by the company subsequent to the
adoption of the plan have had rights attached. The rights are not exercisable
into common stock or transferable apart from the common stock, and no separate
rights certificates will be distributed until ten business days after the public
announcement that a person or group either (i) has acquired, or has obtained the
right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of the outstanding
common shares, or (ii) has commenced, or announced an intention to make, a
tender offer or exchange offer if, upon consummation, such person or group would
be the beneficial owner of 20 percent or more of the outstanding common shares.
The plan was amended in 1994 by the Board of Directors to exclude the effect of
the proposed business combination with Martin Marietta Corporation.
When such rights become exercisable, as described above, each right will
entitle its holder, other than such person or group referred to above, upon
payment of the exercise price, to receive Lockheed common shares with a deemed
market value of twice such exercise price. Such rights will not be triggered in
the event
40
<PAGE> 42
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
of a "qualifying offer" (basically defined as an all cash offer, fully financed,
to acquire a majority of outstanding shares not owned by the offeror, which
meets specified irrevocable criteria), or if the 20 percent acquisition is made
pursuant to a tender or exchange offer for all outstanding common shares which a
majority of the directors of the company deem to be in the best interests of the
company and its stockholders. If there is a merger with an acquirer of 20
percent or more of Lockheed's common stock and Lockheed is not the surviving
corporation, or more than 50 percent of Lockheed's assets, earning power, or
cash flow is transferred or sold, each right will entitle its holder, other than
the acquirer, to receive the acquiring company's common shares with a deemed
market value of twice such exercise price.
All of the rights may be redeemed by the board of directors of the company
at a price of $.05 per right until the earlier of (i) ten business days after
the public announcement that a person or group has acquired beneficial ownership
of 20 percent or more of the outstanding common shares or (ii) December 1996.
After a person or group acquires 20 percent or more of Lockheed's common shares,
the board of directors may redeem the rights only with the concurrence of a
majority of the continuing directors (as defined in the plan). The rights, which
do not have voting rights and are not entitled to dividends, expire in December
1996.
NOTE 12 -- INFORMATION ON INDUSTRY SEGMENTS, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS,
AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
Unaudited information on Lockheed's business segments is included in the
Financial Analysis beginning on page 4.
Selected additional information is summarized below:
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------ ------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Depreciation and amortization
Aeronautical Systems........................... $ 225 $ 216 $ 106
Missiles and Space Systems..................... 145 164 156
Electronic Systems............................. 67 72 74
Technology Services............................ 14 14 11
Corporate*..................................... 34 32 8
------ ------ ------
Total.................................. $ 485 $ 498 $ 355
====== ====== ======
Expenditures for property, plant, and equipment
Aeronautical Systems........................... $ 89 $ 148 $ 140
Missiles and Space Systems..................... 79 98 133
Electronic Systems............................. 38 35 40
Technology Services............................ 11 10 12
------ ------ ------
Total segments................................. 217 291 325
Corporate...................................... 23 30 2
------ ------ ------
Total.................................. $ 240 $ 321 $ 327
====== ====== ======
Identifiable assets
Aeronautical Systems........................... $4,036 $4,336 $2,109
Missiles and Space Systems..................... 1,755 1,810 2,028
Electronic Systems............................. 1,523 1,468 1,506
Technology Services............................ 385 317 300
------ ------ ------
Total segments................................. 7,699 7,931 5,943
Lockheed Finance Corporation................... 110 112 121
Corporate...................................... 1,304 918 960
------ ------ ------
Total.................................. $9,113 $8,961 $7,024
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
---------------
* Depreciation and amortization applicable to corporate office assets is
allocated to the operating segments.
41
<PAGE> 43
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA*
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------- ------- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales
United States............................... $12,790 $12,670 $ 9,656
Other....................................... 340 401 444
------- ------- -------
Total............................... $13,130 $13,071 $10,100
======= ======= =======
Program profits
United States............................... $ 836 $ 839 $ 613
Other....................................... 19 5 31
------- ------- -------
Total............................... $ 855 $ 844 $ 644
======= ======= =======
Identifiable assets
United States............................... $ 8,829 $ 8,730 $ 6,777
Other....................................... 284 231 247
------- ------- -------
Total............................... $ 9,113 $ 8,961 $ 7,024
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
---------------
* Defined by the location of Lockheed operations and not necessarily the
locations of customers. Transfers between geographic areas were not material
in any year.
Identifiable assets in each segment or geographic area include the assets
used in Lockheed's operations, and any applicable excess of the purchase price
over the fair value of net assets acquired or intangible assets acquired, as
appropriate. Consistent with Securities and Exchange Commission rules,
identifiable assets are not reduced by identifiable liabilities. Corporate
assets consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, property, plant,
equipment, assets related to the probable future recovery of certain
environmental remediation costs, current and deferred tax assets, and
investments.
42
<PAGE> 44
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
SALES BY CUSTOMER CATEGORY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992
------ ------- ------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. government*
Aeronautical Systems.......................... $4,714 $ 4,477 $2,245
Missiles and Space Systems.................... 3,218 3,846 4,386
Electronic Systems............................ 525 547 507
Technology Services........................... 1,033 1,179 1,103
------ ------- ------
Total................................. $9,490 $10,049 $8,241
====== ======= ======
Foreign governments
Aeronautical Systems.......................... $1,780 $ 1,408 $ 551
Missiles and Space Systems.................... 290 282 172
Electronic Systems............................ 71 81 126
------ ------- ------
Total................................. $2,141 $ 1,771 $ 849
====== ======= ======
Commercial
Aeronautical Systems.......................... $ 79 $ 125 $ 161
Missiles and Space Systems.................... 100 110 29
Electronic Systems............................ 1,054 768 656
Technology Services........................... 266 248 164
------ ------- ------
Total................................. $1,499 $ 1,251 $1,010
====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
---------------
* Sales made to foreign governments through the U.S. government are included in
sales to foreign governments.
Export sales were $2,079 million, $1,743 million, and $831 million in 1994,
1993, and 1992, respectively.
NOTE 13 -- SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 QUARTERS
----------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH*
------ ------ ------ -------
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales......................................... $3,025 $3,096 $3,165 $3,844
Program profits............................... 194 208 219 234
Earnings before income taxes.................. 149 170 182 194
Net earnings.................................. 92 104 112 137
Earnings per share............................ 1.45 1.64 1.76 2.14
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 QUARTERS
----------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
------ ------ ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales......................................... $2,508 $3,349 $3,475 $3,739
Program profits............................... 158 200 226 260
Earnings before income taxes.................. 126 149 187 214
Net earnings.................................. 76 94 117 135
Earnings per share............................ 1.22 1.50 1.85 2.13
</TABLE>
---------------
* Includes a $25 million reduction in program profits resulting from settlement
of charges contained in a federal indictment, as discussed in Note 10,
partially offset by a $15 million reduction of prior years' estimated income
tax liabilities.
43
<PAGE> 45
NOTE 14 -- EVENT SUBSEQUENT TO DATE OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
(UNAUDITED)
On March 15, 1995, the proposed business combination with Martin Marietta
Corporation (see Note 2) was approved by the shareholders of Lockheed and Martin
Marietta and the business combination was consummated. Upon consummation,
Lockheed became a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation.
THE COMPANY'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management prepared, and is responsible for, the consolidated financial
statements and all related financial information contained in this report. The
consolidated financial statements, which include amounts based on estimates and
judgments, were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles appropriate in the circumstances. Other financial information in this
report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements.
Management recognizes its responsibilities for conducting the company's
affairs in an ethical and socially responsible manner. The company has written
policy statements covering its business code of ethics which emphasize the
importance of total allegiance to codes of personal and corporate conduct that
leave no latitude for legal infractions or moral improprieties. The importance
of ethical behavior is regularly communicated to all employees through ongoing
education and review programs that are designed to create a strong compliance
environment.
Management maintains an accounting system and related internal controls
which it believes provide reasonable assurance, at appropriate cost, that
transactions are properly executed and recorded, that assets are safeguarded,
and that accountability for assets is maintained. An environment that
establishes an appropriate level of control consciousness is maintained and
monitored and includes examinations by an internal audit staff.
The audit committee of the board of directors is composed of five outside
directors. This committee is convened at least four times a year and frequently
meets separately with representatives of the independent auditors, company
officers, and the internal auditors to review their activities.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, independent auditors, whose report follows.
44
<PAGE> 46
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lockheed Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Lockheed
Corporation at December 25, 1994 and December 26, 1993, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 25, 1994. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Lockheed Corporation at December 25, 1994 and December 26, 1993, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 25, 1994, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, effective December 30,
1991 (the beginning of Lockheed's 1992 fiscal year), the company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions."
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 31, 1995
45
<PAGE> 47
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth the name of each member of the Board of
Directors, age as of December 31, 1995, principal occupation and the name and
principal business of any corporation or organization in which such occupation
is carried on and the period during which the director has served. In connection
with the consummation of the Combination, each of the individuals listed below
resigned as a director of the company effective upon the consummation of the
Combination on March 15, 1995. William T. Vinson, Robert B. Corlett, Carol R.
Marshall, Robert E. Rulon and Walter E. Skowronski, all officers of Lockheed
Martin Corporation and the company, were elected directors of the company upon
consummation of the Combination. Their biographies are set forth below under
"Executive Officers of the Registrant."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRINCIPAL BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
DURING PAST FIVE YEARS AND DIRECTOR
NAME AGE OTHER INFORMATION SINCE
---- --- ----------------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Lynne V. Cheney 53 W. H. Brady, Jr., Distinguished Fellow at the American 1994
Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, an
independent, nonpartisan organization sponsoring
original research on domestic and international
economic policy, foreign and defense policy, and
social and political issues since 1992; served as
Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities,
an independent federal agency supporting education,
research, preservation, and public programs in
humanities, 1986-1992; director of Reader's Digest
Association, Inc., IDS Mutual Fund Group, and The
Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
Lodwrick M. Cook 66 Chairman of the Board of ARCO, a petroleum, coal, and 1991
chemical company; served as Chief Executive Officer of
ARCO from October 1985 to July 1994; served as a
director of ARCO since 1980; served as an executive
officer of ARCO since 1970; director of H. F. Ahmanson
& Company; director of Home Savings of America and
Chairman of the Board of Directors of ARCO Chemical
Company
Houston I. Flournoy 65 Special Assistant to the President for Governmental 1976
Affairs, University of Southern California,
Sacramento, California, since August 1981; Professor
of Public Administration, University of Southern
California, Sacramento, California, 1981 to 1993;
served as Vice President for Governmental Affairs,
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1978
to 1981; director of Fremont General Corporation,
Fremont Investment and Loan Corporation, and Tosco
Corporation
James F. Gibbons 63 Dean of the School of Engineering, Stanford 1985
University, Stanford, California, since September
1984; Professor of Electronics, Stanford University,
since 1964; director of Raychem Corporation,
Centrigram Communications Corporation, Cisco Systems
Incorporated and El Paso Natural Gas Company.
Robert G. Kirby 69 Senior Partner, The Capital Group Partners L.P., since 1990
1991; formerly Chairman of the Board of Capital
Guardian Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
The Capital Group, Inc., an investment manager for
pension funds and mutual funds, 1976 to 1991; director
of Capital Guardian Trust Company and Quiksilver Inc.;
member of Board of Governors of the Pacific Stock
Exchange, Incorporated
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE> 48
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRINCIPAL BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
DURING PAST FIVE YEARS AND DIRECTOR
NAME AGE OTHER INFORMATION SINCE
------------------------- --- ------------------------------------------------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Lawrence O. Kitchen 71 Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Corporation 1975
since January 1, 1989; served as Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, 1986
to 1988; served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Corporation, 1975 to 1985; serves on
the Advisory Board of the Industrial Bank of Japan;
director of Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd.
Vincent N. Marafino 64 Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial and 1980
Administrative Officer of the Corporation since August
1, 1988; served as Executive Vice President -- Chief
Financial and Administrative Officer of the
Corporation, 1983 to 1988; served as an executive
officer of the Corporation since 1971
J. J. Pinola 69 Served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive 1983
Officer of First Interstate Bancorp, 1978 to 1990;
director of First Interstate Bancorp, several First
Interstate subsidiaries, SCEcorp, and Southern
California Edison Company
David S. Potter 69 Served as Chairman of the Board of John Fluke 1987
Manufacturing Company, Inc., an electronic instrument
and sensor firm, Everett, Washington, 1990-1991;
retired Vice President and Group Executive of General
Motors Corporation; served as Vice President of
General Motors Corporation, 1976 to 1985; director of
John Fluke Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Frank Savage 56 Chairman, Alliance Capital Management International, 1990
an investment management company, since 1994; Senior
Vice President of The Equitable Life Assurance Society
of the United States since 1987; Chairman of the Board
of Alliance Corporate Finance Group, Inc. since 1993;
Chairman of the Board of Equitable Capital Management
Corporation, 1992-1993; and Vice Chairman of the Board
of Equitable Capital Management Corporation,
1986-1992; director of Alliance Capital Management
Corporation, ARCO Chemical Company, Lexmark Cor-
poration and Essence Communications, Inc.; trustee of
Johns Hopkins University and Howard University; member
of the Council on Foreign Relations; director of the
Boys Choir of Harlem, New York Philharmonic; and
former U.S. Presidential appointee to the Board of
Directors of U.S. Synthetic Fuels Corporation
Daniel M. Tellep 63 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of 1987
the Corporation since January 1, 1989; served as
President of the Corporation, August 1988 to December
1988; served as Group President -- Missiles and Space
Systems of the Corporation, 1986 to 1988, and
President, Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation, 1984 to
1988; served as an executive officer of the
Corporation since March 1983; director of First
Interstate Bancorp, Southern California Edison
Company, and SCEcorp.
Carlisle A. H. Trost 64 Retired Admiral, U.S. Navy, 1990; Chief of Naval 1990
Operations, United States Navy, 1986-1990; also served
as Commander in Chief, U.S. Atlantic Fleet, Commander
U.S. Seventh Fleet, and Deputy Commander in Chief of
the U.S. Pacific Fleet; director of Louisiana Land and
Exploration Company, General Public Utilities Corp.,
and General Public Utilities -- Nuclear Corp., General
Dynamics Corporation, Burdeshaw Associates Ltd.,
Precision Components Corporation, and Bird-Johnson
Company; and Trustee of the U.S. Navy Academy
Foundation
</TABLE>
47
<PAGE> 49
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRINCIPAL BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
DURING PAST FIVE YEARS AND DIRECTOR
NAME AGE OTHER INFORMATION SINCE
---- --- ----------------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
James R. Ukropina 57 Partner, O'Melveny & Myers, a law firm, Los Angeles, 1988
California, since 1992; former Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Enterprises, a
diversified holding company, 1989 to 1991; served as
President of Pacific Enterprises, 1986 to 1989; served
as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of
Pacific Lighting Corporation, 1984 to 1986; director
of Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company and member of
the Board of Trustees of Stanford University
Douglas C. Yearley 58 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive 1990
Officer of Phelps Dodge Corporation, a producer of
copper and copper products, carbon blacks, and wheels
and rims for medium and heavy trucks, Phoenix,
Arizona, serving as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer since 1989 and President since 1991; served as
Executive Vice President of Phelps Dodge Corporation
from 1987 to 1989; served as President of Phelps Dodge
Industries, a division of Phelps Dodge Corporation,
from 1988 to 1990; served as Senior Vice President of
Phelps Dodge Corporation from 1982 to 1986; director
of Phelps Dodge Corporation, J.P. Morgan & Co.
Incorporated, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New
York and USX Corporation
</TABLE>
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The Corporation's standard arrangement with respect to remuneration of
non-employee Directors includes an annual cash payment of $25,000 and payment of
$1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of
Directors attended by a Director. Under a deferred compensation plan, all or a
portion of such remuneration may be deferred to periods following the time a
participant ceases to be a Director. The Corporation has established a trust for
the purpose of securing such deferred cash amounts. In addition, $5,000 is paid
annually on behalf of each non-employee Director to a trust maintained under the
deferred compensation plan for the purpose of purchasing Common Stock on the
open market for the benefit of such non-employee Directors. Prior to 1993,
Directors could also direct a portion of the annual cash payment and meeting
fees to the trust for the purchase of Common Stock. Stock held by the trust is
distributable after a participant ceases to be a Director. The Corporation has
amended the deferred compensation plan so as to continue the deferral of the
cash and stock balances of those Directors who became members of the Lockheed
Martin Board of Directors until after they cease to be members of the Lockheed
Martin Board. Each share of Lockheed Common Stock held by the trust was
exchanged for 1.63 shares of Lockheed Martin Common Stock upon consummation of
the Combination.
Non-employee Directors who have ceased to be Directors and who have reached
age 65 with five or more years of service on the Board of Directors are entitled
to receive an annual retirement benefit equal to the amount of the annual fee,
including the portion contributed to the trust for the purchase of Common Stock,
in effect on the date the Director ceases to be a Director. Unless a Director
elects an equivalent lump sum payment, the benefits are payable monthly to the
retired Director or the Director's surviving spouse for a period equal to the
number of years (including any partial year), up to 20, that the Director served
on the Board of Directors. The Corporation has established a trust for the
purpose of securing benefits provided under this plan. The Corporation has
amended the retirement plan so as to (i) vest all benefits under the plan but
not otherwise increase the amount or duration of the benefits and (ii) make the
benefits payable on the latter of leaving the Board of Directors or the Board of
Directors of Lockheed Martin. As a result of the consummation of the
Combination, Directors Kirby, Savage, Trost and Yearley, each with slightly over
four years of service, became entitled to receive a monthly benefit of $2,500
for five years, payable as described in clause (ii) above. Similarly, Directors
Cheney and Cook became entitled to receive the same benefit for two years and
four years, respectively, based on service of approximately one year and 3 3/4
years, respectively.
During the Corporation's last fiscal year, the Corporation paid Mr. Kitchen
$50,000 in consideration for consultant services rendered to the Corporation in
1994 in regard to various operating and strategic matters.
48
<PAGE> 50
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Prior to the consummation of the Combination, the Board of Directors had
standing Audit, Management Development and Compensation, and Nominating
committees.
The Audit Committee was composed of Messrs. Flournoy, Kirby, Pinola,
Potter, and Ukropina.
The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the "Compensation
Committee") was composed of Messrs. Cook, Gibbons, Pinola, Potter, and Yearley.
The Nominating Committee was composed of Messrs. Cook, Gibbons, Kirby,
Pinola, Savage, and Trost.
Other committees of the Board of Directors consisted of the Executive
Committee composed of Messrs. Kirby, Kitchen, Pinola, Potter, Tellep, and
Ukropina and the Finance Committee composed of Messrs. Flournoy, Kitchen,
Marafino, Pinola, Savage, Trost, Ukropina, and Yearley.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
As of February 1, 1995, the following individuals were executive officers
of the company. Information relating to the ages and five-year position history
of these individuals is listed below. No family relationship between officers
exists. There were no arrangements or understandings between any officer and any
other person pursuant to which he was selected as an officer.
D. M. Tellep, 63, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since
1-1-89; Director since 1987.
V. N. Marafino, 64, Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial and
Administrative Officer since 8-1-88; Director since 1980.
V. D. Coffman, 50, Executive Vice President since 3-2-92. He was Vice
President from 10-3-88 to 3-2-92; President -- Space Systems Division, Lockheed
Missiles & Space Company, Inc., from 10-3-88 to 3-2-92. He was a Vice President
of Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., from 8-3-85 to 3-2-92 and an
employee of that company since 1967.
K. W. Cannestra, 64, President -- Aeronautical Systems Group since 11-7-88.
V. P. Peline, 64, President -- Electronic Systems Group since 3-2-87.
R. B. Young Jr., 60, Vice President since 4-4-83; President -- Technology
Services Group since 7-1-92; he was President -- Lockheed Engineering & Sciences
Company from 12-10-79 until 7-1-92.
D. O. Allen, 58, Vice President -- Information and Administrative Services
since 5-12-87.
M. S. Araki, 63, Executive Vice President, Missiles and Space Systems Group
and Executive Vice President -- Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., since
10-3-88.
J. A. Blackwell, 54, Vice President since 4-28-93; and
President -- Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company since 4-28-93. He has been an
executive employee of Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company since 9-27-86.
H. T. Bowling, 60, President -- Lockheed Aircraft Service Company since
2-6-89. He was Executive Vice President and General Manager -- Lockheed
Aeronautical Systems Company - Ontario from 9-3-87 until 2-6-89.
R. P. Caren, 62, Vice President -- Science and Engineering since 1-1-88.
49
<PAGE> 51
R. K. Cook, 63, Senior Vice President -- Washington Area since 8-1-94. He
was Vice President -- Washington Area from 5-1-73 until 8-1-94.
R. B. Corlett, 55, Vice President -- Human Resources since 3-1-91. He was
an employee of Lockheed Advanced Development Company from 5-21-90 until 3-1-91,
and an employee of Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company from 5-28-87 until
5-21-90.
J. F. Egan, 59, Vice President -- Corporate Development since 4-5-93; Vice
President, Planning and Technology -- Electronic Systems Group from 12-27-86
until 4-5-92.
G. R. England, 57, Vice President since 3-1-93; and President -- Lockheed
Fort Worth Company since 3-1-93. From 1975 until 3-1-93 he was an executive
employee of General Dynamics Corporation.
B. E. Ewing, 50, Vice President since 3-1-93; and Vice President Aircraft
Programs Operations -- Lockheed Fort Worth Company since 3-1-93. From 1-19-81
until 3-1-93 he was an employee of General Dynamics Corporation.
R. R. Finkbiner, 55, Vice President -- Contracts and Pricing since 8-3-92.
He has been an employee of Lockheed Corporation since 3-19-90. From 1987 until
3-19-90 he was an employee of Ernst & Young.
J. S. Gordon, 54, Vice President, and President -- Lockheed Advanced
Development Company, since 3-1-94. From 12-8-90 until 3-1-94 he was Executive
Vice President of Lockheed Advanced Development Company, and has been an
employee of that company since 8-5-63.
D. M. Hancock, 53, Vice President since 3-1-93; and Vice President and F-16
Program Director -- Lockheed Fort Worth Company since 3-1-93. From 1966 until
3-1-93 he was an employee of General Dynamics Corporation.
K. N. Hollander, 53, Vice President -- International Business Development
since 7-1-90. From 1988 until 7-1-90 he was an employee of Ford Aerospace, Inc.
J. R. Kreick, 50, Vice President since 1-1-88; President -- Lockheed
Sanders, Inc., since 1-1-90; President -- Sanders Associates, Inc., from 1-1-88
until 1-1-90.
J. F. Manuel, 55, Vice President -- Domestic Business Development since
4-5-93. He was Staff Vice President -- Domestic Business Development from 5-4-91
until 4-5-93; and has been an employee of the Corporation since 9-12-79.
C. R. Marshall, 41, Vice President -- Secretary and Assistant General
Counsel since 1-1-92. From 7-25-86 until 1-1-92 she was a Corporate Counsel for
the Corporation.
J. S. McLellan, 53, Vice President, and Executive Vice
President -- Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company, since 3-7-94. From 2-22-92
until 3-7-94 he was President -- Lockheed Aircraft Service Company, Executive
Vice President from 4-2-89 until 2-22-92, and had been an employee of that
company since 6-1-65.
L. D. Montague, 61, Vice President; and President -- Missile Systems
Division, Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., since 5-9-89. He has been an
executive employee of Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., since 2-19-77.
G. T. Oppliger, 58, Vice President since 6-3-91; and President -- Lockheed
Space Operations Company, Inc., since 8-1-91. He has been an employee of
Lockheed Space Operations Company, Inc., since 6-22-85.
R. P. Parten, 59, Vice President; and President -- Lockheed Engineering and
Sciences Company since 7-1-92. He has been an executive of that company since
7-1-85.
S. M. Pearce, 57, Vice President -- Corporate Communications since 7-17-90.
From 1979 until 7-17-90 she was an employee of Ford Aerospace, Inc.
J. B. Reagan, 60, Vice President; and Vice President and Assistant General
Manager -- Research and Development Division, Lockheed Missiles & Space Company,
Inc., since 1-1-91. He has been an employee of Lockheed Missiles & Space
Company, Inc., since 1959.
50
<PAGE> 52
P. C. Reynolds, 61, Assistant Treasurer since 10-5-92. He has been an
employee of Lockheed Corporation since 1960.
R. E. Rulon, 52, Vice President and Controller since 2-3-92. He was Vice
President -- Internal Audit from 8-6-90 until 2-3-92, and has been an executive
employee of Lockheed Corporation since 1981.
C. R. Scanlan, 60, Vice President since 1-2-90; Executive Vice President,
Missiles and Space Systems Group and Executive Vice President, Lockheed Missiles
& Space Company, Inc., since 1-2-90. He has been an employee of Lockheed
Missiles & Space Company, Inc., since 1961.
W. E. Skowronski, 46, Vice President and Treasurer since 9-18-92. He was
Staff Vice President -- Investor Relations from 1-2-90 until 9-18-92. He was
Assistant Treasurer of Boston Edison Company from 8-8-83 until 1-2-90.
W. R. Sorenson, 53, Vice President -- Operations since 1-1-92. He was Staff
Vice President -- Manufacturing from 1-2-91 until 1-1-92. From 3-31-81 until
1-2-91 he was an employee of Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company.
D. F. Tang, 61, Vice President since 10-7-91; President -- Space Systems
Division, Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., since 3-2-92. He was Vice
President and Assistant General Manager -- Space Systems Division of Lockheed
Missiles & Space Company, Inc. from 11-19-88 until 3-2-92.
R. E. Tokerud, 58, Vice President since 2-1-93; and President -- Lockheed
Support Systems, Inc., since 9-2-89. He has been an employee of the Corporation
since 4-12-65.
A. G. Van Schaick, 49, Vice President since 6-1-84; and Vice President
Business Operations -- Aeronautical Systems Group since 8-17-92. From 7-1-85
until 8-17-92 he was Vice President and Treasurer of the Corporation.
W. T. Vinson, 51, Vice President and General Counsel since 1-1-92. From
1-2-90 until 1-1-92 he was Vice President, Secretary and Assistant General
Counsel. From 7-1-75 until 1-2-90 he was an employee of Lockheed Missiles &
Space Company, Inc.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the
Corporation's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than
ten percent of a registered class of the Corporation's equity securities, to
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange
initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock
and other equity securities of the Corporation. Based solely on the
Corporation's review of the copies of such forms it has received and written
representations from certain reporting persons that they were not required to
file Forms 5 for specified fiscal years, the Corporation believes that all its
officers and directors complied with all filing requirements applicable to them
with respect to transactions during fiscal 1994. However, U.S. Trust Company of
California, as trustee of the Lockheed (ESOP feature) Trust did not file a Form
4 for a transaction in October 1994 during a period of personnel transition. A
Form 5 reflecting this transaction was filed on February 8, 1995.
51
<PAGE> 53
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the compensation for
services in all capacities earned by each of the Corporation's Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and the other four most highly compensated executive
officers of the Corporation and its subsidiaries (the "named executive
officers") during the three fiscal years ended December 25, 1994.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
COMPENSATION
-----------------------
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS
------------------------------------------- ----------- PAYOUTS
OTHER SECURITIES --------
ANNUAL UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER
NAME OF AND SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION OPTIONS PAYOUTS COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR ($)(A) ($)(B) ($)(C) (#) ($)(D) ($)(E)
------------------- ----- -------- -------- ------------- ----------- -------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D. M. Tellep 1994 820,000 800,000 -- 60,000 513,713 39,434
Chairman of the Board and 1993 762,500 650,000 -- 60,000 203,318 36,746
Chief Executive Officer 1992 750,000 600,000 -- 40,000 95,196 36,692
V. N. Marafino 1994 643,750 600,000 -- 30,000 406,866 30,933
Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief 1993 612,500 525,000 -- 30,000 161,539 29,428
Financial and Administrative Officer 1992 638,346 475,000 -- 30,000 77,574 28,491
V. D. Coffman 1994 411,250 350,000 -- 15,000 158,702 19,763
Executive Vice President 1993 382,500 300,000 -- 15,000 47,533 66,051
1992 350,719 200,000 -- 8,100 15,960 10,964
K. W. Cannestra 1994 356,750 338,000 -- 15,000 164,047 17,081
Group President -- 1993 330,769 285,000 -- 13,000 62,762 15,305
Aeronautical Systems 1992 312,115 189,000 -- 15,000 29,904 14,345
V. P. Peline 1994 311,250 285,000 -- 14,000 155,706 14,963
Group President -- 1993 293,750 235,000 -- 13,000 62,046 14,114
Electronic Systems 1992 278,750 233,000 -- 15,000 30,363 13,634
</TABLE>
---------------
(a) Base salary increases are generally effective in September of each year.
Amounts therefore can reflect a base salary earned for 75% of the year and
an increased base salary earned for 25% of the year. Mr. Cannestra received
a salary increase in March 1993 in connection with his assumption of
expanded responsibilities.
(b) Reported amounts include awards for 1994 performance that were paid in
early 1995 to Messrs. Coffman, Cannestra, and Peline under the
Corporation's Management Incentive Compensation Plan ("MICP"). Payment of
MICP awards for 1993 and 1994 made to Messrs. Tellep and Marafino has been
deferred and may be made in accordance with the provisions of the
Corporation's Deferred Management Incentive Compensation Plan, which
provides for interest on deferred amounts and payment in either a single
sum or installments, as elected by the participant.
(c) Other Annual Compensation in the form of the value of certain perquisites
did not, in the aggregate, exceed the lower of $50,000 or 10% of the
aggregate 1994 salary and bonus compensation of any of the named
executives.
(d) Amounts reported include Long-Term Performance Plan awards for the period
1991-1993 which were paid in 1994.
(e) 1994 amounts include the Corporation's contributions to the qualified
savings plan for Messrs. Tellep, Marafino, Coffman, Cannestra, and Peline
of $5,397; $11,250; $5,397; $11,254; and $11,250, respectively; and the
Corporation's contributions to the non-qualified supplemental plan of
$5,397; $19,683; $5,397; $5,827; and $3,714, respectively. Of the $66,051
shown for Mr. Coffman in 1993, $46,164 represents taxable relocation
reimbursement and $1,500 represents non-taxable relocation reimbursement.
52
<PAGE> 54
The table below shows information regarding grants of stock options made to
the named executive officers under the Corporation's 1992 Employee Stock Option
Program during the fiscal year ended December 25, 1994. The Corporation did not
grant any stock appreciation rights during the 1994 fiscal year. The amounts
shown for each of the named executive officers as potential realizable values
are based on arbitrarily assumed annualized rates of stock price appreciation of
zero percent, five percent and ten percent over the full ten-year term of the
options.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
----------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES % OF TOTAL POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT ASSUMED
UNDERLYING OPTIONS ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK PRICE
OPTIONS GRANTED TO EXERCISE OR APPRECIATION FOR OPTION TERM
GRANTED EMPLOYEES IN BASE PRICE EXPIRATION --------------------------------------
NAME (#)(A,B,C) FISCAL YEAR ($/SH) DATE 0% ($) 5% ($)(D) 10% ($)(D)
---------------------------------- ---------- ------------ ----------- ---------- ------ ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D. M. Tellep...................... 60,000 9.4 64.81 2/8/2004 0 2,445,520 6,197,427
V. N. Marafino.................... 30,000 4.7 64.81 2/8/2004 0 1,222,760 3,098,713
V. D. Coffman..................... 15,000 2.3 64.81 2/8/2004 0 611,380 1,549,357
K. W. Cannestra................... 15,000 2.3 64.81 2/8/2004 0 611,380 1,549,357
V. P. Peline...................... 14,000 2.2 64.81 2/8/2004 0 570,621 1,446,066
All Lockheed Stockholders(e)...... -- -- -- -- 0 2,577,240,551 6,531,233,566
</TABLE>
---------------
(a) Options granted pursuant to the Corporation's 1992 Employee Stock Option
Program. The options were exercisable starting 12 months after the grant
date with 50% of the shares covered thereby becoming exercisable at that
time and with an additional 50% of the option shares becoming exercisable
on the second anniversary date. The exercisability of all of the options
was accelerated as a result of the Combination. The options were granted
with an exercise price of 100% of fair market value on the date of grant
and for a term of 10 years (subject to earlier termination at or 12 months
after a termination of employment other than by reason of death, disability
or retirement). A description of certain additional features of this Option
Program is provided under the section herein entitled "Employee Stock
Option Programs."
(b) Under the terms of this Option Program, the Compensation Committee retains
discretion, subject to plan limits, to modify the terms of outstanding
options and to reprice the options.
(c) The exercise price and tax withholding obligations related to exercise may
be paid by delivery of already owned shares or by offset of the underlying
shares, subject to certain conditions.
(d) The potential realizable values shown are on a pre-tax basis.
(e) The stockholder amounts shown above do not include dividends, and are based
on the market price and outstanding shares of Common Stock held by all
stockholders (other than the Corporation) on the grant date.
As of the consummation of the Combination, each outstanding option under
the Option Program to purchase a share of Common Stock was converted into an
option to purchase 1.63 shares of common stock of Lockheed Martin.
THESE POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUES ARE BASED SOLELY ON ARBITRARILY ASSUMED
RATES OF APPRECIATION REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE SEC REGULATIONS AND ARE NOT
INTENDED TO FORECAST FUTURE APPRECIATION, IF ANY, OF THE COMMON STOCK. ACTUAL
GAINS, IF ANY, ON OPTION EXERCISES AND COMMON STOCK HOLDINGS ARE DEPENDENT ON
THE FUTURE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMON STOCK, OVERALL STOCK MARKET CONDITIONS, AND
OTHER FACTORS. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUES
SHOWN IN THIS TABLE WILL BE ACHIEVED.
53
<PAGE> 55
The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of stock
options during the 1994 fiscal year by each of the named executive officers and
the fiscal year-end spread on unexercised "in-the-money" options. No stock
appreciation rights were exercised in 1994 by the named executive officers or
held by them at fiscal year-end.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FY-END OPTION VALUE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
OPTIONS OPTIONS
AT FY-END AT FY-END
(#) ($)(A)
VALUE ------------ --------------------
SHARES ACQUIRED REALIZED(A) EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME ON EXERCISE(#) ($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- --------------- ----------- ------------ --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D. M. Tellep........................... 7,500 197,812 223,933/ 6,196,143/
90,000 798,975
V. N. Marafino......................... 0 0 175,998/ 5,037,132/
45,000 399,487
V. D. Coffman.......................... 0 0 38,409/ 1,017,218/
22,500 199,743
K. W. Cannestra........................ 0 0 37,332/ 1,020,794/
21,500 186,866
V. P. Peline........................... 5,500 143,000 88,895/ 2,549,778/
20,500 179,988
</TABLE>
---------------
(a) Market value of underlying securities at exercise date or year-end, as the
case may be, minus the exercise or base price of "in-the-money" options.
"Value Realized" and "Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options" are on a
pre-tax basis.
The following table sets forth information concerning individual awards
for the Long Term Performance Plan (the "LTPP") cycle beginning in the 1994
fiscal year for the 1994-1996 LTPP Cycle for each of the named executive
officers. The plan was terminated as of March 15, 1995 upon consummation of the
Combination.
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
PERFORMANCE OR UNDER NON-STOCK PRICE BASED PLANS(A, B)
OTHER PERIOD ---------------------------------------
UNTIL MATURATION THRESHOLD TARGET MAXIMUM
NAME OF PAYOUT(B) ($) ($) ($)
---- ---------------- --------- ------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
D. M. Tellep............................ 3 years 0 500,421 1,000,842
V. N. Marafino.......................... 3 years 0 390,405 780,810
V. D. Coffman........................... 3 years 0 199,710 399,420
K. W. Cannestra......................... 3 years 0 174,883 349,766
V. P. Peline............................ 3 years 0 151,577 303,154
</TABLE>
---------------
(a) Awards under the LTPP are based upon a combination of factors including (i)
the Corporation's absolute percentage gain in total stockholder value as
compared to an absolute target approved by the Compensation Committee, and
(ii) the Corporation's investment value relative to a peer group investment
value.
(b) As described below, the LTPP was terminated upon consummation of the
Combination.
54
<PAGE> 56
The LTPP was terminated upon consummation of the Combination on March 15,
1995. Under the terms of the LTPP, the participants were entitled to prorated
awards for compensation earned up to the date the Combination was consummated
for each performance cycle terminated prior to the end of the three year period,
with the awards calculated as if the pre-established targets had been obtained.
The total prorated payments for the 1993-1995 LTPP cycle and the 1994-1996 cycle
for each of the named executive officers were: D. M. Tellep ($555,770), V. N.
Marafino ($437,077), V. D. Coffman ($222,154), K. W. Cannestra ($193,154), and
V. P. Peline ($169,138). A new LTPP was instituted March 16, 1995 under which
participants may, based upon future performance, attain previously established
target awards or maximums.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
The Corporation's Management Incentive Compensation Plan provides for
incentive compensation payments to certain management employees selected by the
Compensation Committee, which administers the plan. Approximately 975 employees
are eligible to participate in this plan. The award of incentive compensation,
if any, is made on an annual basis, generally during the first quarter of the
year following the year during which the services on which the award is based
were performed, although the Compensation Committee may defer payment of any
individual participant's award. The aggregate amount of awards, if any, made
under this plan is at the discretion of the Board of Directors following the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee. Individual awards are typically
determined by a formula which takes into consideration the performance of the
employee and the operating company or organization to which the employee is
assigned during the year in respect of which the award is earned. Companies are
measured against specific financial objectives such as pre-tax earnings, cash
flow management, and funded sign-ups. Also measured are other significant
operational objectives. Subject to certain conditions, an employee may defer the
payment of all or a portion of an award. The Corporation has established a trust
for the purpose of securing payments of such deferred amounts. All amounts
accumulated and unpaid under this plan must be paid by the Corporation in a lump
sum within fifteen calendar days following a change in control, as defined. The
Combination was not a change in control for purposes of this plan.
SALARIED EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN
The Corporation's Savings Plan is available to substantially all salaried
employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Approximately 50,000
employees, including officers and key employees, participate in the Plan. The
Savings Plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(k) and 401(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Under the Savings Plan,
participants may elect to defer receipt of 2% to 12% of their regular
compensation and have it contributed to the Savings Plan or make such
contributions on an after-tax basis (the "Participant's Contribution"). The
Corporation presently matches 60% of the first 8% of compensation contributed on
behalf of the employee (the "Matching Contribution"). Under the Code, a maximum
of $9,240 (subject to annual indexing adjustments) can be deferred under the
Savings Plan in 1994. All amounts contributed to the Savings Plan by
participants in excess of such maximum limitation are not treated as deferred
compensation.
All contributions are paid to a trustee and invested for the benefit of the
participant. Participant Contributions are invested either entirely in a Bond
Fund, a Securities Fund or a Short Term Investment Fund, or in a combination
thereof, as specified by the individual participant. Alternatively, a
participant may specify that 25% of such contributions be invested in Common
Stock. 50% of the Corporation's Matching Contributions is invested in Common
Stock and the remaining 50% is invested in the same funds as the Participant's
Contribution.
Effective March 27, 1989, the Corporation amended the Savings Plan to
create the Lockheed (ESOP Feature) Trust (the "ESOP Trust") to fund a portion of
the Corporation's Matching Contributions. On April 4, 1989, the Corporation sold
to the ESOP Trust 10,613,458 shares of the Common Stock for an aggregate
purchase price of $500 million. The purchase price was borrowed by the ESOP
Trust and will be repaid over fifteen years, with release of shares from a
suspense account to participants in the plan over that period as the loan is
repaid. The Common Stock portion of the Corporation's Matching Contributions is
fulfilled, in part, with the stock allocated from the suspense account
(approximately 710,000 shares per year). The balance of
55
<PAGE> 57
the stock portion of the Corporation's Matching Contributions is fulfilled
through purchases of Common Stock on the open market or from participants who
terminate their employment by retirement or otherwise. 3,000 shares of Common
Stock were purchased on the open market by the ESOP Trust in 1994. Participants'
accounts become distributable to participants upon termination of employment,
except that all or portions of the Corporation's Matching Contributions are
forfeited under certain circumstances. In 1994 the ESOP Trust also sold on the
open market 519,000 shares purchased from participants who terminated their
employment by retirement or otherwise.
The Savings Plan provides that the participants may instruct the ESOP Trust
trustee to vote the shares allocated to their accounts and may separately
instruct the ESOP Trust trustee to vote a proportionate amount of the
unallocated shares held by the ESOP Trust. With respect to any allocated shares
held by the ESOP Trust for which instructions are not received, the ESOP Trust
trustee may vote such shares in its discretion. All unallocated shares held by
the ESOP Trust are to be voted by the ESOP Trust trustee on the same basis as
unallocated shares for which instructions are received.
Because of the limitations on annual contributions to the Savings Plan
contained in the Code, certain employees are not allowed to elect to contribute
the maximum 12% of compensation otherwise permitted by the Savings Plan. In
order to afford to such employees approximately equivalent benefits of such full
participation, the Board of Directors has authorized a supplemental plan in
which these employees may participate. This plan provides for the payment upon
termination of employment, subject to restrictions similar to those contained in
the Savings Plan, of amounts deferred by the employee in excess of the Code's
deferral limit, the Corporation's Matching Contributions and the income on both.
The Corporation has established a trust for the purpose of securing the payment
of the benefits provided under this plan. All amounts accumulated and unpaid
under this supplemental plan must be paid by the Corporation in a lump sum
within fifteen calendar days following a change in control, as defined. The
Combination was not a change in control for purposes of this plan.
RETIREMENT PLAN
The Corporation's salaried employees retirement plan, which covers certain
executive officers and most salaried employees, is noncontributory and provides
that those employees meeting certain age and service requirements shall be
entitled to certain benefits in the event of normal, early, disability, or
deferred retirement. The plan also allows payment of benefits to a deceased
employee's surviving spouse, provided that certain conditions are met. The
amount of retirement benefits received by a retiree is subject to adjustment if
one of several available optional payment arrangements is selected. The plan
also provides for certain death benefits payable to designated beneficiaries of
eligible retirees. The calculation of retirement benefits for the named
executives is by a formula which includes years of credited service and average
pay (salary plus bonus as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table) for the
highest five consecutive years of the last ten years of employment with the
Corporation preceding retirement.
The plan protects the benefits of participants and retirees thereunder in
the event of a non-Board approved change in control of the Corporation, as
defined. The plan generally provides that (i) the plan may not be terminated and
the benefits payable thereunder may not be adversely modified for a period of
two years following such change in control; (ii) the plan may not be merged or
consolidated with an underfunded plan during the five-year period following such
change in control; and (iii) if the plan is terminated within the five-year
period following such change in control, any surplus assets remaining after
satisfaction of all plan liabilities, taxes and other rightful claims of the
U.S. government shall be transferred to a trust and applied solely to the
payment of certain employee benefits otherwise payable to employees and retirees
(e.g., retiree medical benefits), which trust shall remain in existence at least
until the expiration of such five-year term. In addition, during the five-year
period following such change in control, the plan may not invest in securities
issued by the Corporation or any entity in which 10% or more of the equity
interests are held in the aggregate by officers, directors, or 5% stockholders
of the Corporation or any of their affiliates.
The maximum benefits under the plan are subject to the limitations from
time to time in effect under the Code. In order to provide certain employees
with a retirement benefit equal to that which they would have
56
<PAGE> 58
received in the absence of such limitations, the Board of Directors has
authorized a supplemental retirement plan for the employees who are subject to
such limitations. This supplemental plan provides for the payment of the
difference between the actual benefits payable under the salaried employees
retirement plan and the benefits that would have been payable under that plan
except for such limitations. The Board of Directors has also authorized a
supplemental retirement plan under which employees who are participants in the
Management Incentive Compensation Plan will receive an additional retirement
benefit in the amount of the difference between their benefit under the salaried
employees retirement plan and what their benefit would be if the portion of
their awards under the Management Incentive Compensation Plan not taken into
account in determining such benefit due to certain Code limitations were taken
into account and without regard to certain other limitations imposed by the
Code. The additional benefit payable under each of these supplemental plans is
calculated and payable in the same manner as the employee's benefit under the
salaried employees retirement plan; except that each supplemental retirement
plan provides that participants may elect a lump sum payment in lieu of annuity
payments and any participant in such plans at the time of a change in control of
the Corporation, as defined, will receive the actuarial equivalent of such
benefits in a lump sum payable by the Corporation within thirty calendar days
following the change in control. The Corporation has established a trust for the
purpose of securing the payment of benefits provided under these plans. The
Combination was not a change in control for purposes of these plans.
The following table sets forth estimated annual pension benefits under the
salaried employees retirement plan and the supplemental plans on a single life
annuity basis for representative years of credited service as defined in the
salaried employees retirement plan.
ESTIMATED RETIREMENT PLAN BENEFITS AT SELECTED COMPENSATION AND SERVICE
CATEGORIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED ANNUAL PENSION FOR
FIVE-YEAR REPRESENTATIVE YEARS OF CREDITED SERVICE
AVERAGE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION 15 20 25 30 35 40
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 300,000 $ 66,910 $ 89,213 $111,516 $133,819 $156,122 $ 178,620
400,000 89,408 119,210 149,013 178,816 208,618 238,616
500,000 111,906 149,208 186,510 223,812 261,114 298,611
600,000 134,406 179,208 224,010 268,812 313,614 358,606
700,000 156,902 209,203 261,504 313,805 366,106 418,601
800,000 179,041 239,201 299,001 358,801 418,601 478,597
900,000 201,899 269,198 336,498 403,798 471,097 538,592
1,000,000 224,397 299,196 373,995 448,794 523,593 598,587
1,100,000 246,895 329,194 411,492 493,790 576,089 658,582
1,200,000 269,393 359,191 448,989 538,787 628,585 718,582
1,300,000 291,893 389,191 486,489 583,787 681,085 778,577
1,400,000 314,392 419,189 523,986 628,783 733,580 838,573
1,500,000 336,890 449,186 561,483 673,780 786,076 898,568
1,600,000 359,388 479,184 598,980 718,776 838,572 958,563
1,700,000 381,886 509,182 636,477 736,772 891,068 1,018,558
</TABLE>
Such benefits are not subject to any deduction for Social Security benefits
or other offset amounts. Messrs. Tellep, Marafino, Coffman, Cannestra, and
Peline have approximately 39, 35, 27, 32, and 36 years of credited service under
the plan, respectively.
TERMINATION BENEFITS AGREEMENTS
In 1991, Lockheed entered into revised severance agreements (the
"Termination Benefits Agreements") with 23 of the current Board-elected
executive officers, including Messrs. Tellep, Marafino, Coffman, Cannestra, and
Peline. From January 1992 through March 1994, Lockheed entered into 14
additional Termination Benefits Agreements with certain executive officers when
they were elected by the Lockheed
57
<PAGE> 59
Board of Directors. The Termination Benefits Agreements provide for the payment
of certain benefits described below if, within three years after the occurrence
of certain events with respect to Lockheed (which are defined in the Termination
Benefits Agreements and includes the Combination), the covered executive officer
either (a) is terminated by Lockheed (other than on account of death, disability
or retirement of the officer or for "cause," defined in the Termination Benefits
Agreements to include, among other things, willful and continued failure to
substantially perform his or her duties, or willful misfeasance or gross
negligence related to his or her employment) or (b) terminates his or her
employment with Lockheed for "good reason" (as defined in the Termination
Benefits Agreements to include, among other things, a reduction in base salary,
bonus or certain other benefits, certain changes in status, duties or position
with Lockheed or geographic relocation).
Lockheed's Termination Benefits Agreements generally provide for a lump sum
cash payment (the "Lump Sum Payment") equal to the sum of the following amounts:
two times the officer's base annual salary at the time of the triggering event
or termination, two times an amount determined by multiplying the officer's base
salary by the average percentage of awards under the Lockheed Management
Incentive Compensation Plan to base salary paid during the last two years, and
the cash value of the officer's contingent award established under the Lockheed
Long Term Performance Plan for each incomplete performance cycle as of the date
of termination, calculated on the basis that all performance goals were fully
attained and such performance cycles were completed in their entirety. The
Termination Benefits Agreements also provide for a payment equal to the value of
certain health and dental insurance plans and other fringe benefits as in effect
prior to the change in control for a two-year period following termination.
Additional benefits provided by the Termination Benefits Agreements include the
vesting of all retirement benefits and the addition of two years of credited
service under Lockheed's salaried retirement plans and the entitlement to two
additional years of matching contributions under Lockheed's savings plans. If
the officer attains age 65 within two years of termination of employment,
certain benefits under the Termination Benefits Agreement will be pro-rated
accordingly. If the officer obtains other employment, the Lump Sum Payment
received on termination may be reduced if compensation received from the new
employer exceeds fifty percent of the annualized salary and bonus included in
the Lump Sum Payment, provided that in no event will the Lump Sum Payment be
reduced to an amount less than one year's annual compensation. Benefits under
the Termination Benefits Agreements may be subject to an excise tax payable by
the officer, and may not be deductible by Lockheed, to the extent they exceed
certain statutory limitations.
Each of the Termination Benefits Agreements continues in effect through the
end of the calendar year and is automatically extended on each January 1
thereafter for an additional year unless Lockheed gives the officer advance
notice to the contrary. Stockholder approval of the Combination on March 15,
1995 triggered an automatic extension of the Termination Benefits Agreements to
a date 36 months after such approval.
The severance policy of Lockheed with respect to executive officers as
reflected in the Termination Benefit Agreements was approved by an advisory vote
of the stockholders of Lockheed in April 1991.
As of March 15, 1995, three executive officers, including Messrs. Cannestra
and Peline, had expressed an intention to claim benefits under these agreements.
EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PROGRAMS
The Corporation's 1982 Employee Stock Purchase Program (the "1982 Program")
and 1986 Employee Stock Purchase Program (the "1986 Program") and 1992 Employee
Stock Option Program (the "1992 Program") initially authorized grants of options
and stock appreciation rights to acquire up to 1,250,000 shares, 2,750,000
shares and 3,000,000 shares, respectively, of the Corporation's authorized but
unissued Common Stock. Such grants are limited to officers and other key
employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Non-employee directors and
members of the Compensation Committee are not eligible to participate in the
1982 Program, the 1986 Program or the 1992 Program. The number of shares subject
to outstanding options theretofore granted under the 1982 Program and the number
of shares authorized for grants under the 1982 Program were adjusted in
accordance with their respective terms to reflect the three-for-one split of the
Corporation's Common Stock which became effective on August 22, 1983.
58
<PAGE> 60
The 1982 Program, the 1986 Program and the 1992 Program are each composed
of two separate stock option plans. The first plan provides for the grant of
options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422A of the
Code. Options granted under this incentive stock option plan cannot be
accompanied by stock appreciation rights. The second plan provides for the grant
of stock options that are not incentive stock options and that may, at the
discretion of the Board of Directors, include the grant (at the time the option
is granted or at any time during the option's term) of stock appreciation rights
relating to options. A stock appreciation right, which cannot be exercised
within the first six months of grant, relates to a particular option and extends
to a specified number of shares that can be no more than 50% of the number of
shares subject to the related option. The holder of an option with a companion
stock appreciation right, accordingly, is able to purchase half the shares then
exercisable under the stock option and receive payment, in cash or Common Stock,
as determined by the Compensation Committee, on the remaining half equal to the
appreciation in value of such shares since the date of such option grant.
Grants under the 1982 Program and the 1986 Program were made by the Board
of Directors after consideration of the recommendations of the Compensation
Committee. Under the terms of the 1992 Program, grants are made by the
Compensation Committee, which consists of non-employee directors who are not
eligible to participate in the 1982 Program, the 1986 Program, or the 1992
Program. The 1982 Program, the 1986 Program and the 1992 Program provide that
the option price may not be less than the fair market value of the Common Stock
on the date of grant and that, except as otherwise determined by the
Compensation Committee with respect to the 1986 Program and the 1992 Program,
options may not be exercised prior to one year after the date of grant. The 1986
Program and the 1992 Program further provide that, if the Board of Directors
determines that a change in control, as defined, has occurred or is about to
occur, outstanding options and any companion stock appreciation rights, to the
extent not exercisable, will become fully exercisable. No additional grants may
be made under the 1982 Program which terminated on February 28, 1992.
At March 1, 1995, 84,637, 1,145,348 and 1,559,250 shares of the
Corporation's Common Stock were reserved for issuance on exercise of options
under the 1982 Program, the 1986 Program and 1992 Program, respectively. Upon
consummation of the Combination, each option for a share of Lockheed common
stock was converted to an option for 1.63 shares of Lockheed Martin common stock
and all outstanding options became immediately exercisable. Subsequent to March
15, 1995, grants will no longer be made under these plans.
59
<PAGE> 61
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Lockheed Common
Stock beneficially owned, as of December 31, 1994 unless otherwise indicated.
The number of shares shown for each director and each of the named executive
officers represent less than 1 percent of the shares of Lockheed Common Stock
outstanding. The number of shares shown for all directors and executive officers
as a group represented approximately 2.7 percent of the Lockheed Common Stock
outstanding. Unless otherwise indicated, and except as such powers may be shared
with their spouses, the individuals named below have sole voting and investment
power with respect to the shares indicated below. Upon consummation of the
Combination, each share of Lockheed common stock was converted into 1.63 shares
of Lockheed Martin common stock.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES OF
LOCKHEED
COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIALLY
NAME OWNED
---- ------------
<S> <C>
K. W. Cannestra..................................................... 59,645(2)(3)
Lynne V. Cheney..................................................... 451(1)(4)
V. D. Coffman....................................................... 62,862(2)(3)
Lodwrick M. Cook.................................................... 1,414(1)
Houston I. Flournoy................................................. 1,152(1)(5)
James F. Gibbons.................................................... 2,429(1)
Robert G. Kirby..................................................... 1,577(1)
Lawrence O. Kitchen................................................. 25,689(1)(2)
Vincent N. Marafino................................................. 263,153(2)(3)
V. P. Peline........................................................ 115,937(2)(3)
J. J. Pinola........................................................ 1,152(1)(6)
David S. Potter..................................................... 5,081(1)
Frank Savage........................................................ 1,518(1)
Daniel M. Tellep.................................................... 327,179(2)(3)
Carlisle A. H. Trost................................................ 748(1)
James R. Ukropina................................................... 1,152(1)
Douglas C. Yearley.................................................. 1,152(1)
All directors and executive officers as a group
(50 individuals, including those named above)..................... 1,619,778(7)
</TABLE>
---------------
(1) Includes shares held in trust under Lockheed's directors deferred
compensation plan. As of December 31, 1994, Directors Cheney, Cook,
Flournoy, Gibbons, Kirby, Kitchen, Pinola, Potter, Savage, Trost, Ukropina
and Yearley have been credited with 151; 1,414; 152; 1,429; 1,577; 152; 152;
4,981; 768; 748; 152 and 152 shares, respectively, pursuant to such plan.
The directors do not have or share voting or investment power for their
respective shares held in the trust, except in the event of a tender offer.
(2) Shares of Lockheed Common Stock held beneficially by Messrs. Cannestra,
Coffman, Kitchen, Marafino, Peline and Tellep include 58,832; 60,909;
21,000; 220,998; 109,395; and 313,933 shares, respectively, which are
subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 1994 or upon
consummation of the Combination.
(3) Includes shares held under the Lockheed Salaried Employees Savings Plan
Plus, as of November 30, 1994. Messrs. Cannestra, Coffman, Marafino, Peline
and Tellep have been credited with 813; 753; 1,029; 1,042 and 877 shares,
respectively, pursuant to such plan.
(4) Includes 300 shares held in a trust of which Mrs. Cheney and her husband are
trustees and with respect to which she has shared voting and investment
power.
(5) Includes 350 shares held in trusts of which Mr. Flournoy and his wife are
trustees and with respect to which he has shared voting and investment
power.
60
<PAGE> 62
(6) Includes 1,000 shares held in a trust of which Mr. Pinola and his wife are
trustees and with respect to which he has shared voting and investment
power.
(7) Includes 1,509,637 shares which are subject to presently exercisable options
or options which will become exercisable upon consummation of the proposed
business combination; 24,007 shares held as of November 30, 1994, by the
Lockheed Savings Plan for the beneficial interest of officers; 11,828 shares
held for the benefit of non-employee directors as of December 31, 1994, by
the trustees of the Lockheed directors' deferred compensation plan and as to
which such non-employee directors have no voting or investment power, other
than as to a tender offer, and certain shares with respect to which the
officers and directors disclaim beneficial ownership or do not have sole
investment and voting power.
FIVE PERCENT STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the shares of
Lockheed Common Stock which are held by persons known to Lockheed to be the
beneficial owners of more than 5% of such stock. All information set forth in
the following table is as of December 31, 1994, except as otherwise indicated.
Each share of Lockheed Common Stock was converted on March 15, 1995 into a right
to receive 1.63 shares of the common stock of Lockheed Martin.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOCKHEED
COMMON STOCK
BENEFICIALLY OWNED
-----------------------
NUMBER PERCENT
NAME AND ADDRESS OF STOCKHOLDER OF SHARES OF CLASS
------------------------------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
US Trust Company of California, N.A., New York, N.Y., as trustee of the 15,429,145(1) 24.4%
Lockheed (ESOP Feature) Trust established under the Lockheed Salaried
Employee Savings Plan Plus, and the trustee of the Lockheed (Hourly
ESOP) Trust established under the Lockheed Hourly Employee Savings
Plan Plus and the Lockheed Space Operations Company Hourly Employee
Investment Plan Plus
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
INVESCO PLC 4,612,891(2) 7.3%
11 Devonshire Square
London EC2M 4YR
England
Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., Inc. 4,651,269(3) 7.4%
One State Street Plaza
New York, New York 10004-1545
</TABLE>
---------------
(1) As reported in Schedule 13G dated February 13, 1995. Stockholder has sole
dispositive power and shared voting power with respect to the number of
shares stated.
(2) As reported in Schedule 13G dated February 10, 1995, Stockholder has sole
voting power with respect to none of the shares, shared voting power with
respect to 4,612,891 of the shares, sole dispositive power with respect to
none of the shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 4,612,891 of
the shares.
(3) As reported in Schedule 13G dated February 7, 1995. Stockholder has sole
voting power with respect to 2,409,559 of the shares and sole dispositive
power with respect to 4,651,269 of the shares.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information required by this item is included in Item 10 of this Part III.
61
<PAGE> 63
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Index to Consolidated Financial Statements, Consolidated Financial Statement
Schedules and Exhibits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE NO.
--------
<S> <C> <C>
1. Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II
Consolidated Statement of Earnings for Years Ended December 25, 1994,
December 26, 1993, and December 27, 1992............................ 20
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for Years Ended December 25, 1994,
December 26, 1993, and December 27, 1992............................ 21
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 25, 1994, and December 26,
1993.................................................................. 22
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for Years Ended
December 25, 1994, December 26, 1993, and December 27, 1992......... 23
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.............................. 24
The Company's Responsibility for Financial Reporting.................... 44
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors....................... 45
2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted since the
required information is not present or is not present in amounts
sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the
information required is included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and related notes.
3. Index to Exhibits....................................................... 63
</TABLE>
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
Not Applicable
62
<PAGE> 64
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of August 29, 1994,
among Lockheed Martin Corporation, Martin Marietta Corporation and
the Registrant, as amended as of February 7, 1995(F).................
2.2 Plan and Agreement of Merger, dated as of August 29, 1994, among the
Registrant, Pacific Sub, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation (G)....
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation(A)......................................
3.2 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation(B).........................
3.3 Bylaws of Lockheed Corporation(C)....................................
3.4 Amendment to Bylaws of Lockheed Corporation(D).......................
4.1 Certificate of Incorporation(A)......................................
4.2 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation(B).........................
4.3 Bylaws of Lockheed Corporation(C)....................................
4.4 Amendment to Bylaws of Lockheed Corporation(D).......................
4.5 The registrant undertakes to file with the Commission upon its
request any agreements otherwise excluded from Item 601(b)(4) as not
exceeding ten percent of the total assets of the registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.................................
10.1 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 8, 1992, between the
Registrant and General Dynamics Corporation(E).......................
*10.2 Lockheed Corporation 1992 Employee Stock Option Program(H)...........
*10.3 Amendment to Lockheed Corporation 1992 Employee Stock Option
Plan(I)..............................................................
*10.4 Lockheed Corporation 1986 Employee Stock Purchase Program, as
amended(I)...........................................................
*10.5 Lockheed Corporation 1982 Employee Stock Purchase Program, as
amended(I)...........................................................
*10.6 Incentive Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain Executives of Lockheed
Corporation, as amended..............................................
*10.7 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain Transferred
Employees of Lockheed Corporation, as amended........................
*10.8 Supplemental Benefit Plan of Lockheed Corporation, as amended........
*10.9 Long-Term Performance Plan of Lockheed Corporation and its
Subsidiaries(I)......................................................
*10.10 Supplemental Savings Plan of Lockheed Corporation, as amended........
*10.11 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Lockheed Corporation, as
amended(I)...........................................................
*10.12 Lockheed Corporation Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended.......
*10.13 Form of Lockheed Corporation Termination Benefits Agreement effective
January 1, 1991(J)...................................................
*10.14 Trust Agreement, as amended February 3, 1995, between Lockheed
Corporation and First Interstate Bank of California(I)...............
*10.15 Lockheed Corporation Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan Trust
Agreement, as amended(I).............................................
*10.16 Trust Agreement, dated December 22, 1994, between Lockheed
Corporation and J.P. Morgan California with respect to certain
employee benefit plans of Lockheed Corporation(I)....................
---------------
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
</TABLE>
63
<PAGE> 65
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
11 Computation of Earnings per Share of Common Stock....................
12 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges...................................
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.......................................
23 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors...................
27 Financial Data Schedule (filed as an exhibit to registrant's report
on Form 8-K dated February 21, 1995).................................
99.1 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the Lockheed Salaried Employee Savings
Plan Plus (to be filed at a later date under Form 10-K/A)............
99.2 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the Lockheed Hourly Employee Savings
Plan Plus (to be filed at a later date under Form 10-K/A)............
99.3 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the Lockheed Space Operations Company
Hourly Employee Investment Plan Plus (to be filed at a later date
under Form 10-K/A)...................................................
99.4 Annual Report on Form 11-K for the Lockheed Corporation Hourly
Employee Savings and Stock Investment Plan -- Fort Worth and Abilene
Divisions (to be filed at a later date under Form 10-K/A)............
</TABLE>
---------------
(A) Incorporated by reference to registrant's registration on Form B filed July
1, 1986, as Exhibit 3(a).
(B) Incorporated by reference to registrant's report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 28, 1987, as Exhibit 3.
(C) Incorporated by reference to registrant's report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 27, 1993, as Exhibit 3.
(D) Incorporated by reference to registrant's report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 26, 1993.
(E) Incorporated by reference to registrant's report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 27, 1992.
(F) Incorporated by reference to Appendix I to the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus included as part of Lockheed Martin Corporation's
registration on Form S-4 filed February 9, 1995 (File No. 33-57645).
(G) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit D to Appendix I to the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus included as part of Lockheed Martin Corporation's
registration on Form S-4 filed February 9, 1995 (File No. 33-57645).
(H) Incorporated by reference to registrant's registration on Form S-8 filed
September 11, 1992 (File No. 33-49003).
(I) Incorporated by reference to Lockheed Martin Corporation's registration on
Form S-4 filed February 9, 1995 (File No. 33-57645).
(J) Incorporated by reference to registrant's report on Form 8, Amendment No. 1
to Exhibit 28 of Form 8-K dated November 5, 1990.
64
<PAGE> 66
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(Registrant)
/s/ C. R. MARSHALL
--------------------------------------
C. R. Marshall
(Vice President and Secretary)
Date: March 24, 1995
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ D. M. TELLEP Chief Executive Officer March 24, 1995
---------------------------------------------- (Principal Executive
D. M. Tellep Officer)
/s/ V. N. MARAFINO Chief Financial and March 24, 1995
---------------------------------------------- Administrative Officer
V. N. Marafino (Principal Financial
Officer)
/s/ R. E. RULON Controller (Principal March 24, 1995
---------------------------------------------- Accounting Officer) and
R. E. Rulon Director
/s/ W. T. VINSON Chairman of the Board March 24, 1995
----------------------------------------------
W. T. Vinson
/s/ R. B. CORLETT Director March 24, 1995
----------------------------------------------
R. B. Corlett
/s/ W. E. SKOWRONSKI Director March 24, 1995
----------------------------------------------
W. E. Skowronski
/s/ C. R. MARSHALL Director March 24, 1995
----------------------------------------------
C. R. Marshall
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.6
INCENTIVE RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
FOR CERTAIN EXECUTIVES OF
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED MARCH 15, 1995)
<PAGE> 2
INCENTIVE RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
FOR CERTAIN EXECUTIVES OF
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED MARCH 15, 1995)
ARTICLE I
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
This plan is established for the purpose of providing a retirement benefit
for certain executive employees which takes into account incentive compensation
for retirement benefit purposes.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
1. PLAN -- This Incentive Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain Executive
Employees.
2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS -- The Board of Directors of Lockheed Corporation.
3. COMMITTEE -- The Management Development and Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors as from time to time appointed or constituted by the
Board of Directors.
4. COMPANY -- Lockheed Corporation and its subsidiaries.
5. SALARY BOARD -- The Corporate Salary Board of Lockheed Corporation.
6. RETIREMENT PLAN -- The Lockheed Retirement Plan for Certain Salaried
Employees.
7. CREDITED SERVICE -- The term defined in Section 1.10 of the Retirement
Plan. In the case of an employee whose service with the Company, in whole or in
part, was not Credited Service under the Retirement Plan because he or she was
not in a Covered Group, as defined in said plan, or because of a limitation on
Credited Service under said plan, Credited Service shall be determined as though
the employee were not subject to such exclusion or limitation.
8. INCENTIVE RETIREMENT BENEFIT -- The monthly benefit payable in
accordance with the Plan.
9. PARTICIPANT -- A person eligible to receive a benefit under the Plan.
10. INCENTIVE PLAN -- The Management Incentive Compensation Plan (including
the Deferred Management Incentive Compensation Plan) of the Company, and any
incentive compensation plan of any subsidiary or affiliated corporation of
Lockheed Corporation which the Salary Board determines is a corresponding
incentive plan.
11. WEEKLY INCENTIVE COMPENSATION -- The award earned for any year under
the Incentive Plan divided by fifty-two (52) or, for any year in which a
pro-rated award is earned, the award earned divided by the number of weeks in
the pro-ration period, to the extent such amount is not included in the
Participant's Weekly Rate of Compensation.
12. EXCESS BASE RATE OF PAY -- The term defined in Section 1.12 of the
Retirement Plan.
13. EXCESS WEEKLY COMPENSATION -- The sum of Excess Base Rate of Pay plus
the Weekly Incentive Compensation, if any, for any year.
14. AVERAGE EXCESS WEEKLY COMPENSATION -- The amount obtained by dividing
the sum of Excess Weekly Compensation for each of the five (5) highest
consecutive years of the last ten (10) years of service with the Company by five
(5).
15. WEEKLY RATE OF COMPENSATION -- The term defined in Section 1.26 of the
Retirement Plan.
1
<PAGE> 3
16. TOTAL WEEKLY COMPENSATION -- The sum of Weekly Rate of Compensation
plus Weekly Incentive Compensation, if any, for any year.
17. AVERAGE WEEKLY COMPENSATION -- The amount obtained by dividing the sum
of Total Weekly Compensation for each of the five (5) highest consecutive years
of the last ten (10) years of service with the Company by five (5).
18. COMPENSATING PLAN -- Any deferred compensation plan or retirement plan
determined by the Salary Board to have been adopted by a Lockheed company in
lieu of the Retirement Plan.
19. COMPENSATING PLAN BENEFIT -- The monthly amount calculated by
converting the present value of the lump sum payable under the Compensating
Plan, at the time of a Participant's retirement or death, to an annuity of the
same form as the benefit payable under the Plan.
20. SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN -- The Supplemental Benefit Plan of Lockheed
Corporation.
21. ACTUARIAL EQUIVALENT -- A benefit which has the equivalent value
computed using the interest rate which would be used by the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation to determine the present value of an immediate lump sum
distribution on termination of a pension plan, as in effect on January 1 of the
year in which the Participant's termination of employment occurs, and the 1983
Group Annuity Mortality Table.
ARTICLE III
ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION
A. (1) An Employee or former employee of the Company who, on or after
January 1, 1984, (1) becomes eligible to receive a benefit under the
Retirement Plan or a Compensating Plan and (2) at the time of such
eligibility is, or for any year during his or her last ten (10) years of
service with the Company was, a participant in the Incentive Plan of the
Company, will be eligible to receive a Incentive Retirement Benefit
commencing on the date of the first payment of the benefit under the
Retirement Plan or a Compensating Plan.
(2) An Employee or former employee of the Company who, on or after
January 1, 1987, (1) becomes eligible to receive a benefit under the
Retirement Plan or a Compensating Plan and (2) at the time of such
eligibility is, or for any year during his or her last ten (10) years of
service with the Company was, a participant in an incentive compensation
plan of the Company which has not been determined to be a corresponding
incentive plan, and (3) who has been specifically named by the Salary Board
as a Participant, will be eligible to receive an Incentive Retirement
Benefit commencing on the date of the first payment of the benefit under
the Retirement Plan or a Compensating Plan. Such non-corresponding
incentive plan shall be deemed to be an Incentive Plan with respect to such
named Participant.
B. The surviving spouse of an employee who dies while in active employment
with the Company shall be eligible to receive an Incentive Retirement Benefit if
the surviving spouse is entitled to receive a surviving spouse benefit under the
Retirement Plan or a Compensating Plan.
C. An employee who terminated employment with the Company prior to January
1, 1984, when eligible for a deferred retirement benefit under Section 5.03 of
the Retirement Plan shall not be eligible to receive an Incentive Retirement
Benefit.
2
<PAGE> 4
ARTICLE IV
PLAN BENEFIT
A. The Incentive Retirement Benefit payable to a Participant at normal
retirement age as defined in Section 1.17 of the Retirement Plan or as the
result of total and permanent disability shall be determined as follows:
(1) Add (i) the amount obtained by multiplying Sixteen Dollars and
Twenty-five cents ($16.25) by the number of years of the Participant's
Credited Service not in excess of thirty-five (35) years and adding thereto
the amount obtained by taking One and One-half percent (1 1/2%) of the
Participant's Average Excess Weekly Compensation multiplied by four and
three hundred thirty-three thousandths (4.333) multiplied by the number of
years of the Participant's Credited Service not in excess of thirty-five
(35) years, plus (ii) the amount obtained by taking One and One-half
percent (1 1/2%) of the Participant's Average Weekly Compensation
multiplied by four and three hundred thirty-three thousandths (4.333)
multiplied by the number of years of the Participant's Credited Service
beyond thirty-five (35) years.
(2) Calculate the sum of the monthly benefit payable under the
Retirement Plan, the Compensating Plan Benefit, if any, and the
Supplemental Benefit Plan Benefit, if any, payable to the Participant.
(3) The Incentive Retirement Benefit shall be the amount determined in
(1), above, minus the amount determined in (2), above.
B. The Incentive Retirement Benefit payable to a Participant who satisfies
the Retirement Plan rules for early retirement eligibility as set forth in
Section 5.02 of said plan or for a deferred monthly retirement benefit in
accordance with the rules set forth in Section 5.03 of said plan, whether or not
such Participant is a member of said plan, shall be calculated in accordance
with the provisions of Section 6.02(A) of said plan, for early retirement, or
Section 6.03 of said plan, for deferred retirement, as applied to the Incentive
Retirement Benefit amount calculated in accordance with Paragraph A, above.
C. The Incentive Retirement Benefit payable to the surviving spouse of a
Participant who dies while in active employment with the Company shall be
calculated in the same manner as the pre-retirement surviving spouse annuity
under the Retirement Plan, based upon the Incentive Retirement Benefit amount
calculated in accordance with Paragraph A, above.
ARTICLE V
PAYMENT OF BENEFIT
A. Except as provided in Paragraphs B and C below and subject to the
provisions of Article VI the Incentive Retirement Benefit shall be paid to the
retired Participant, or to a Participant's surviving spouse, in accordance with
the payment provisions applicable to the retirement benefits under the
Retirement Plan, including any election made by the Participant in respect of
optional post retirement annuity forms, or any other available payment
provisions as stated in this Plan, in accordance with the provisions of Section
7 of the Retirement Plan.
B. In lieu of receipt of annuity payments under Paragraph A above, a
Participant may elect to receive in a single lump sum payment an amount equal to
the Actuarial Equivalent of his Incentive Retirement Benefit or, effective
October 1, 1993, the Participant also has the option to receive a partial
annuity payment in the same form as elected under the Lockheed Retirement Plan,
with the balance of the benefit amount paid to him in a lump sum.
Any benefit option election must be made within the sixty (60) day period
preceding retirement by following the procedure established by the
administrator. Payment will be made to the Participant six (6) months following
his retirement.
3
<PAGE> 5
C. (1) A Person receiving an annuity benefit from this Plan at the time of
a Change in Control shall be paid in a single lump sum within thirty (30)
calendar days following such Change in Control, an amount equal to the Actuarial
Equivalent of such annuity benefit. Within thirty (30) calendar days following a
Change in Control a Participant who has not yet retired shall be paid in a
single lump sum an amount equal to the Actuarial Equivalent of his or her
Incentive Retirement Benefit, calculated as if the Participant had retired on
the date of the Change in Control.
(2) For purposes of this Plan, a Change in Control shall be deemed to
have occurred if (i) any "person," as such term is used in Sections 13(d)
and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an
employee benefit plan of Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin") or
any of its subsidiaries, becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule
13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of
Lockheed Martin representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of
Lockheed Martin's then outstanding securities; or (ii) during any period of
two consecutive years (not including any period prior to the adoption of
this Paragraph C), individuals who at the beginning of such period
constitute the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin, and any new director
(other than a director designated by a person who has entered into an
agreement with Lockheed Martin to effect a transaction described in clause
(i) or (iii) of this Paragraph) whose election by the Board of Directors of
Lockheed Martin or nomination for election by Lockheed Martin's
shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the
directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning
of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously
so approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority
thereof; or (iii) the shareholders of Lockheed Martin approve a merger or
consolidation of Lockheed Martin with any other corporation, other than a
merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of
Lockheed Martin outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to
represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into
voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 80% of the combined
voting power of the voting securities of Lockheed Martin or such surviving
entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (iv)
the shareholders of Lockheed Martin approve a plan of complete liquidation
of Lockheed Martin or an agreement for the sale or disposition by Lockheed
Martin of all or substantially all of Lockheed Martin's assets.
A Change in Control shall not, however, include any transaction which
has been approved by individuals who at the beginning of any period of at
least two consecutive years (not including any period prior to the adoption
of this Paragraph C) constitute the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin
and any new director (other than a director designated by a person who has
entered into an agreement with Lockheed Martin to effect a transaction
described in clause (i) or (iii) of this Paragraph) whose election by the
Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin or nomination for election by
Lockheed Martin's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least
two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were
directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination
for election was previously so approved.
(3) This Paragraph C shall apply only to a Change in Control of
Lockheed Martin and shall not cause lump sum payment of annuity benefits in
any transaction involving Lockheed Martin's sale, liquidation, merger, or
other disposition of any subsidiary.
(4) This Paragraph C may be canceled or modified at any time prior to
a Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, this Paragraph C
shall remain in force and effect, and shall not be subject to cancellation
or modification for a period of five (5) years, and any other provision
defining a capitalized term used in Paragraph C shall, for purposes of
Paragraph C, be subject to cancellation or modification during the five (5)
year period.
4
<PAGE> 6
ARTICLE VI
NONASSIGNABILITY
No rights or interests of any Participant or surviving spouse under this
Plan shall be assignable, transferable or subject to anticipation, alienation,
encumbrance, pledge or charge of any nature. Any attempt to take such action in
violation of this Article shall be void and shall authorize the Committee, in
its discretion, to forfeit all or any further right and interest in the
Incentive Retirement Benefit of such Participant or surviving spouse.
ARTICLE VII
TRUST
Although the Plan is an unfunded plan, the Company has established a trust
(the "Trust") pursuant to a trust agreement dated December 22, 1994 by and
between the Company and J. P. Morgan California to hold assets, subject to the
claims of the Company's creditors in the event of its insolvency, to pay
benefits under this Plan. The Company shall no later than nine months following
the close of its fiscal year make contributions to the Trust in an amount
sufficient, when added to the then principal of the Trust and after
consideration of benefits to be paid pursuant to other plans covered by the
Trust, to equal the present value of benefits which have accrued under the Plan
during the preceding fiscal year, as such amount is determined by an independent
actuary.
ARTICLE VIII
ADMINISTRATION
The Plan shall be administered by the Salary Board under the general
direction of the Committee. Subject to such direction, and such rules and
procedures as the Committee may prescribe, the Salary Board shall have the right
and discretion to construe the Plan, to interpret any provision thereof, to make
rules and regulations relating to the Plan, and to determine any factual
question arising in connection with the Plan's operation after such
investigation or hearing as the Salary Board may deem appropriate. Any decision
made by the Salary Board under the provisions of this Article shall be
conclusive and binding on all parties concerned.
ARTICLE IX
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN
Except as provided in paragraph C(4) of Article V, the Board of Directors
shall have the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. In the event of
Plan amendment or termination which has the effect of eliminating or reducing an
accrued benefit under this Plan without a corresponding increase in benefits
under a plan described in Paragraph B of Article IV:
1. The Incentive Retirement Benefit payable on account of a retired
Participant or a surviving spouse shall not be impaired; and
2. The benefits of other Participants shall not be less than the Incentive
Retirement Benefit to which each such Participant would have been entitled if he
or she had retired immediately prior to such amendment or termination of the
Plan. Such benefit shall be calculated in accordance with Article IV, except
that for purposes of Section 6.02(A) of the Retirement Plan, the Participant's
age and Credited Service at the time of termination of employment, rather than
such age or service at the time of Plan amendment or termination, shall be
utilized in determining the eighty-five (85) rule. For such purposes, Credited
Service shall have the meaning defined in Article II.
5
<PAGE> 7
ARTICLE X
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS
Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to give any person any right to remain
in the employ of the Company or affect any right of the Company to terminate a
person's employment.
ARTICLE XI
EFFECTIVE DATE
The Plan shall be effective January 1, 1984.
6
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.7
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
FOR CERTAIN TRANSFERRED EMPLOYEES
OF LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED MARCH 15, 1995)
ARTICLE I
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
This plan is established for the purpose of providing an additional
retirement benefit for certain employees whose regular retirement benefits have
been reduced as a result of employment service at more than one Lockheed
company.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
1. BASIC RETIREMENT BENEFIT -- The monthly amount equal to the sum of a
Member's Retirement Plan Benefits and Compensating Plan Benefits.
2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS -- The Board of Directors of Lockheed Corporation.
3. COMMITTEE -- The Management Development and Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors as from time to time appointed or constituted by the
Board of Directors.
4. COMPANY -- Lockheed Corporation and its subsidiaries.
5. COMPENSATING PLAN -- Any deferred compensation plan or retirement
benefit plan adopted by a Company in lieu of the Retirement Plan.
6. COMPENSATING PLAN BENEFITS -- The monthly amount calculated by
converting the present value of Compensating Plan benefits, if any, at the time
of a Member's retirement or death, to an annuity of the same form as the Member
has elected under the Retirement Plan.
7. CREDITED SERVICE -- The term defined in Section 1.10 of the Retirement
Plan.
8. IMPUTED CREDITED SERVICE -- The period of employment service by a
Member of this Plan at a Participating Company at which no Credited Service is
earned.
9. IMPUTED RETIREMENT PLAN BENEFIT -- The Retirement Plan Benefits to
which a retiring Member, or a Member's surviving spouse, would be entitled if
such Member's Imputed Credited Service were deemed to be years of Credited
Service.
10. PARTICIPATING COMPANY -- A Lockheed Company designated by the Salary
Board as a Company at which employment service of a Member shall be Imputed
Credited Service.
11. PLAN -- This Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan for Certain
Transferred Employees.
12. RETIREMENT PLAN -- The Lockheed Retirement Plan for Certain Salaried
Employees.
13. RETIREMENT PLAN BENEFITS -- The monthly retirement benefit amount
payable under the Retirement Plan, and under the Supplemental Retirement Plan
for Certain Executives of Lockheed Corporation.
14. SALARY BOARD -- The Corporate Salary Board of Lockheed Corporation.
1
<PAGE> 2
ARTICLE III
ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION
Those employees of the Company who
(1) are Members of the Retirement Plan, and
(2) are transferred to a participating Company, and
(3) are identified by such Participating Company as a Key Employee at
the time of such transfer
will be considered eligible for selection by the Salary Board for membership in
the Plan. No member of the Salary Board shall be eligible for membership in the
Plan.
ARTICLE IV
PLAN BENEFIT
The Supplemental Benefit payable to a retiring Member, or to the surviving
spouse of a Member, shall be the monthly amount, if any, by which the Member's
Basic Retirement Benefit is less than the Imputed Retirement Plan Benefit for
such Member. In lieu of receipt of monthly benefit payments as described in this
Article IV, a participant may elect to receive in a single lump sum payment, an
amount equal to the actuarial equivalent of his benefit payment under this plan
in accordance with procedures as set forth by the Committee. The supplemental
benefit amount payable to a retiring member may, effective October 1, 1993, also
be elected in the form of a partial annuity payment extended in the same form as
elected under the Lockheed Retirement Plan, with the balance of the benefit
amount paid to him in a lump sum. Such Supplemental Benefit shall be determined
and fixed as of the date of the Member's retirement or death, and shall not be
subject to adjustment on account of subsequent amendment of the Retirement Plan.
ARTICLE V
PAYMENT OF BENEFIT
A. Subject to the provisions of Article VI and Article VII, the
Supplemental Benefit shall be paid to the retiring Member, or to a Member's
surviving spouse, in accordance with the payment provisions applicable to the
retirement benefits under the Retirement Plan, including any election made by
the Member under the Retirement Plan with respect to optional annuity forms, or
any other benefit payment options as provided by Section 7 of the Retirement
Plan.
B. (1) A Member receiving an annuity benefit from this Plan at the time of
a Change in Control shall be paid in a single lump sum within thirty (30)
calendar days following such Change in Control, an amount equal to the actuarial
equivalent of such annuity benefit. Within thirty (30) calendar days following a
Change in Control a Member who has not yet retired shall be paid in a single
lump sum an amount equal to the actuarial equivalent of his or her Supplemental
Benefit, calculated as if the Member had retired on the date of the Change in
Control.
(2) For purposes of this Plan, a Change in Control shall be deemed to have
occurred if (i) any "person," as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), other
than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit
plan of Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin") or any of its
subsidiaries, becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the
Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of Lockheed Martin
representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of Lockheed Martin's then
outstanding securities; or (ii) during any period of two consecutive years (not
including any period prior to the adoption of this Paragraph B), individuals who
at the beginning of such period constitute the Board of Directors of Lockheed
Martin, and any new director (other than a director designated by a person who
has entered into an agreement with Lockheed Martin to effect a transaction
described in clause (i) or (iii) of this Paragraph) whose election by the Board
of Directors of Lockheed Martin or nomination for election by Lockheed
2
<PAGE> 3
Martin's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of
the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of
the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so
approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof; or
(iii) the shareholders of Lockheed Martin approve a merger of consolidation of
Lockheed Martin with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation
which would result in the voting securities of Lockheed Martin outstanding
immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining
outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving
entity) at least 80% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of
Lockheed Martin or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such
merger or consolidation or (iv) the shareholders of Lockheed Martin approve a
plan of complete liquidation of Lockheed Martin or an agreement for the sale or
disposition by Lockheed Martin of all or substantially all of Lockheed Martin's
assets.
A Change in Control shall not, however, include any transaction which has
been approved by individuals who at the beginning of any period of at least two
consecutive years (not including any period prior to the adoption of this
Paragraph B) constitute the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin and any new
director (other than a director designated by a person who has entered into an
agreement with Lockheed Martin to effect a transaction described in clause (i)
or (iii) of this Paragraph) whose election by the Board of Directors of Lockheed
Martin or nomination for election by Lockheed Martin's shareholders was approved
by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office
who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or
nomination for election was previously so approved.
(3) This Paragraph B shall apply only to a Change in Control of Lockheed
Martin and shall not cause lump sum payment of annuity benefits in any
transaction involving Lockheed Martin's sale, liquidation, merger, or other
disposition of any subsidiary.
(4) This Paragraph B may be canceled or modified at any time prior to a
Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, this Paragraph B shall
remain in force and effect, and shall not be subject to cancellation or
modification for a period of five (5) years, and any other provision defining a
capitalized term used in Paragraph B shall, for purposes of Paragraph B, be
subject to cancellation or modification during the five (5) year period.
ARTICLE VI
FORFEITURE
In the event that a retired Member has taken or permitted some act or
omission resulting in damage or competitive injury to the Company, then, unless
such act or omission shall have been taken or permitted in good faith without
reasonable cause to believe that it was improper, or illegal, or harmful, a
majority of the Committee may, in its discretion, terminate or reduce all future
payments of Supplemental Benefits to such Member.
ARTICLE VII
NONASSIGNABILITY
No rights or interests of any Member or surviving spouse under this Plan
shall be assignable, transferable or subject to anticipation, alienation,
encumbrance, pledge or charge of any nature. Any attempt to take such action in
violation of this Article shall be void and shall authorize the Committee, in
its discretion, to forfeit all or any further right and interest in the
Supplemental Benefit of such Member or surviving spouse.
ARTICLE VIII
TRUST
Although the Plan is an unfunded plan, the Company has established a trust
(the "Trust") pursuant to a trust agreement dated December 22, 1994 by and
between the Company and J. P. Morgan California to hold
3
<PAGE> 4
assets, subject to the claims of the Company's creditors in the event of its
insolvency, to pay benefits under this Plan. The Company shall no later than
nine months following the close of its fiscal year make contributions to the
Trust in an amount sufficient, when added to the then principal of the Trust and
after consideration of benefits to be paid pursuant to other plans covered by
the Trust, to equal the present value of benefits which have accrued under the
Plan during the preceding fiscal year, as such amount is determined by an
independent actuary.
ARTICLE IX
ADMINISTRATION
The Plan shall be administered by the Salary Board under the general
direction of the Committee. Subject to such direction, and such rules and
procedures as the Committee may prescribe, the Salary Board shall have the right
to construe the Plan, to interpret any provision thereof, to make rules and
regulations relating to the Plan, and to determine any factual question arising
in connection with the Plan's operation after such investigation or hearing as
the Salary Board may deep appropriate. Any decision made by the Salary Board
under the provisions of this Article shall be conclusive and binding on all
parties concerned.
ARTICLE X
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN
The Board of Directors shall have the right to amend or terminate the Plan
at any time or in cases where amendments are necessary to implement changes not
affecting the overall functioning of the Plan; and such changes will not, in the
judgment of the Lockheed Corporate Salary Board, substantially alter the nature
or expense of the affected plan, then the power to amend shall also be
designated to the Corporate Salary Board under guidance from counsel. In the
event of Plan amendment or termination, the Supplemental Benefit payable on
account of a retired or deceased Member shall not be impaired, and the benefits
of other Members shall not be less than the Supplemental Benefit to which each
such member would have been entitled if he or she had retired immediately prior
to such amendment or termination of the Plan.
ARTICLE XI
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS
Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to give any person any right to remain
in the employ of the Company or affect any right of the Company to terminate a
person's employment.
ARTICLE XII
EFFECTIVE DATE
The Plan shall be effective January 1, 1984.
4
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.8
SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN
OF
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED MARCH 15, 1995)
<PAGE> 2
SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN
OF
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED MARCH 15, 1995)
ARTICLE I
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
This Plan is established to supplement the benefits of certain employees
under the Lockheed Retirement Plan for Certain Salaried Employees to the extent
that such benefits are reduced by the limitations on benefits imposed by Section
415 of the Internal Revenue Code. It is intended that this Plan shall be an
Excess Benefit Plan as defined in Section 3(36) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
1. PLAN -- This Supplemental Benefit Plan.
2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS -- The Board of Directors of Lockheed Corporation.
3. CODE -- The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
4. COMMITTEE -- The Management Development and Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors as from time to time appointed or constituted by the
Board of Directors.
5. COMPANY -- Lockheed Corporation and its Subsidiaries.
6. PARTICIPANT -- Any employee participating in the Plan in accordance with
its terms.
7. RETIREMENT PLAN -- The Lockheed Retirement Plan for Certain Salaried
Employees.
8. SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT -- The monthly benefit payable in accordance with
the Plan.
9. ACTUARIAL EQUIVALENT -- A benefit which has the equivalent value
computed using the interest rate which would be used by the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation to determine the present value of an immediate lump sum
distribution on termination of a pension plan, as in effect on January 1 of the
year in which the Participant's termination of employment occurs, and the 1983
Group Annuity Mortality Table.
ARTICLE III
ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION
Those employees of the Company who are members of the Retirement Plan and
whose benefits thereunder are affected by the limitation on benefits imposed by
Section 415 of the Code or who, prior to August 29, 1994, entered into a
Termination Benefits Agreement with Lockheed Corporation, shall be eligible to
participate in the Plan. No member of the Committee shall be eligible for
participation in the Plan.
ARTICLE IV
PLAN BENEFITS
A. The Supplemental Benefit which each Participant shall be entitled to
receive under this Plan shall be the difference between the actual benefits of
such Participant under the Retirement Plan and the benefits that would have been
payable under the Plan except for the limitations on benefits imposed by Section
415 of the Code, as provided in Section 10.01 of the Retirement Plan, plus any
additional benefits to which the Participant becomes entitled pursuant to
Section 6(a) of his or her Termination Benefits Agreement on account of the
merger of Lockheed Corporation contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization
1
<PAGE> 3
dated as of August 29, 1994, by and among Lockheed Martin Corporation, Martin
Marietta Corporation, and Lockheed Corporation.
B. Except as provided in Paragraphs C and D below, the benefits payable
under this Plan shall be payable to the Participant or to any other person who
is receiving or entitled to receive benefits with respect to the Participant
under the Retirement Plan, and shall be paid in the same form, at the same times
and for the same period as benefits are paid with respect to the Participant
under the Retirement Plan.
C. In lieu of receipt of the annuity payments under Paragraph B above, a
Participant may elect to receive in a single lump sum payment an amount equal to
the Actuarial Equivalent of his Supplemental Benefit. Effective October 1, 1993,
a Participant also has the option to receive a partial annuity payment, in the
same form as elected under the Lockheed Retirement Plan with the balance of the
benefit amount paid to him in a lump sum payment. Any election must be made
within the sixty (60) day period preceding retirement by following the procedure
established by the administrator. Payment will be made to the Participant six
(6) months following his retirement.
D. (1) A Person receiving an annuity benefit from this Plan at the
time of a Change in Control shall be paid in a single lump sum within
thirty (30) calendar days following such Change in Control, an amount equal
to the Actuarial Equivalent of such annuity benefit. Within thirty (30)
calendar days following a Change in Control a Participant who has not yet
retired shall be paid in a single lump sum an amount equal to the Actuarial
Equivalent of his or her Supplemental Benefit, calculated as if the
Participant had retired on the date of the Change in Control.
(2) For purposes of this Plan, a Change in Control shall be deemed to
have occurred if (i) any "person", as such term is used in Sections 13(d)
and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), other than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an
employee benefit plan of Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin") or
any of its subsidiaries, becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule
13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of
Lockheed Martin representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of
Lockheed Martin's then outstanding securities; or (ii) during any period of
two consecutive years (not including any period prior to the adoption of
this Paragraph D), individuals who at the beginning of such period
constitute the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin, and any new director
(other than a director designated by a person who has entered into an
agreement with Lockheed Martin to effect a transaction described in clause
(i) or (iii) of this Paragraph) whose election by the Board of Directors of
Lockheed Martin or nomination for election by Lockheed Martin's
shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the
directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning
of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously
so approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority
thereof; or (iii) the shareholders of Lockheed Martin approve a merger or
consolidation of Lockheed Martin with any other corporation, other than a
merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of
Lockheed Martin outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to
represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into
voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 80% of the combined
voting power of the voting securities of Lockheed Martin or such surviving
entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (iv)
the shareholders of Lockheed Martin approve a plan of complete liquidation
of Lockheed Martin or an agreement for the sale or disposition by Lockheed
Martin of all or substantially all of Lockheed Martin's assets.
A Change in Control shall not, however, include any transaction which
has been approved by individuals who at the beginning of any period of at
least two consecutive years (not including any period prior to the adoption
of this Paragraph D) constitute the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin
and any new director (other than a director designated by a person who has
entered into an agreement with Lockheed Martin to effect a transaction
described in clause (i) or (iii) of this Paragraph) whose election by the
Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin or nomination for election by
Lockheed Martin's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least
two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who
2
<PAGE> 4
either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or
nomination for election was previously so approved.
(3) This Paragraph D shall apply only to a Change in Control of
Lockheed Martin and shall not cause lump sum payment of annuity benefits in
any transaction involving Lockheed Martin's sale, liquidation, merger, or
other disposition of any subsidiary.
(4) This Paragraph D may be canceled or modified at any time prior to
a Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, this Paragraph D
shall remain in force and effect, and shall not be subject to cancellation
or modification for a period of five (5) years, and any provision defining
a capitalized term used in Paragraph D shall, for purposes of Paragraph D,
be subject to cancellation or modification during the five (5) year period.
ARTICLE V
TRUST
Although the Plan is an unfunded plan, the Company has established a trust
(the "Trust") pursuant to a trust agreement dated December 22, 1994 by and
between the Company and J. P. Morgan California to hold assets, subject to the
claims of the Company's creditors in the event of its insolvency, to pay
benefits under this Plan. The Company shall no later than nine months following
the close of its fiscal year make contributions to the Trust in an amount
sufficient, when added to the then principal of the Trust and after
consideration of benefits to be paid pursuant to other plans covered by the
Trust, to equal the present value of benefits which have accrued under the Plan
during the preceding fiscal year, as such amount is determined by an independent
actuary.
ARTICLE VI
ADMINISTRATION
The Plan shall be administered under the direction of the Committee. The
Committee shall have the right and discretion to construe the Plan, to interpret
any provision thereof, to make rules and regulations relating to the Plan, and
to determine any factual question arising in connection with the Plan's
operation after such investigation or hearing as the Committee may deem
appropriate. Any decision made by the Committee under the provisions of this
Article shall be conclusive and binding on all parties concerned.
ARTICLE VII
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN
Except as provided in Paragraph D(4) of Article IV, the Board of Directors
shall have the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. In the event of
Plan amendment or termination, a Participant's benefits under the Plan shall not
be less than the Plan benefits to which the Participant would have been entitled
if the Participant had retired immediately prior to such amendment or
termination of the Plan.
ARTICLE VIII
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS
Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to give any person any right to remain
in the employ of the Company or affect any right of the Company to terminate a
person's employment.
ARTICLE IX
EFFECTIVE DATE
The Plan shall be effective with respect to the plan years of the
Retirement Plan commencing on and after December 25, 1982.
3
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.10
SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN
OF
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED MARCH 15, 1995)
ARTICLE I
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
This Plan is established to supplement the benefits of certain employees
under the Lockheed Salaried Employees Savings Plan Plus ("Savings Plan") whose
benefits are reduced by (1) the limitation on Annual Additions under Code
Section 415 and (2) the compensation limit under Code Section 401(a)(17). It is
intended that this Plan shall be an Excess Benefit Plan as defined in Section 3
(36) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
The terms and definitions used in the Savings Plan are incorporated by
reference in this Plan unless superseded by this Plan's terms.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
1. PLAN -- Supplemental Savings Plan of Lockheed Corporation
2. ANNUAL ADDITION -- The term defined in Section 5.02(c)(1) of the
Savings Plan.
3. BOARD OF DIRECTORS -- The Board of Directors of Lockheed Corporation.
4. CODE -- The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to
time.
5. COMMITTEE -- The Management Development and Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors appointed by the Board of Directors.
6. CORPORATION -- Lockheed Corporation and its Subsidiaries.
7. PARTICIPANT -- Any employee who meets the Article III eligibility
requirements.
8. SAVINGS PLAN -- The Lockheed Salaried Employees Savings Plan Plus.
9. EXCESS SAVINGS AMOUNT -- The amount a Participant specifies to be
credited to the Participant's Account in lieu of paying such amount to the
Participant in cash, in accordance with the Participant's election to defer such
payment.
ARTICLE III
ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION
Employees of the Corporation who are Participants in the Savings Plan and
(1) whose benefits in that Plan are affected by (a) the Annual Additions
limitation of Code Section 415 or (b) the Code Section 401(a) (17) compensation
limit, or (2) who, prior to August 29, 1994, entered into a Termination Benefits
Agreement with Lockheed Corporation, may participate in the Plan. No member of
the Committee shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.
1
<PAGE> 2
ARTICLE IV
PLAN BENEFITS
Each Participant shall be entitled to receive a benefit under this Plan
which is the difference between the Participant's benefit under the Savings Plan
and the approximate benefits that would have been payable under that Plan except
for (1) the limitations on Annual Additions to a Participant's Account under
Code Section 415, as provided in Section 5.02 of the Savings Plan, and/or (2)
the Elective Deferral limitation of Code Section 402(g), and/or the compensation
limit under Code Section 401(a)(17). In addition, if a Participant becomes
entitled to the benefits described in Section 6(c) of his or her Termination
Benefits Agreement on account of the merger of Lockheed Corporation contemplated
by the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of August 29, 1994, by and
among Lockheed Martin Corporation, Martin Marietta Corporation, and Lockheed
Corporation, such benefits shall be paid at the same time and in the same manner
as the other benefits payable under this Plan.
ARTICLE V
EXCESS SAVINGS AMOUNT
1. An eligible employee may become a Participant by Filing With the
Committee documents specifying the Excess Savings Amount to be deducted from his
wages and credited to his Participant's Account. The Excess Savings Amount
deducted and credited shall be equal to the difference between the percentage
requested by the Participant on the election form in accordance with Section 3
of the Savings Plan and
(a) the Participant's actual Elective Deferral Percentage under the
Savings Plan as limited by the Annual Additions limit, or
(b) the Participant's actual Elective Deferral Percentage under the
Savings Plan as limited by the Code Section 402(g) Elective Deferral limit,
or
(c) the Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit.
2. Such amount shall be effective coincident with the effective date of
the Participant's Elective Deferral under the Savings Plan, and shall be
irrevocable for that Plan Year.
ARTICLE VI
PARTICIPANT'S ACCOUNT
A separate Participant's Account shall be maintained for each Participant
which shall show in dollars (1) the Excess Savings Amount specified by the
Participant and (2) the corresponding Corporation Matching Contributions, and in
terms of Units, (3) the portion of the Participant's Account in the Bond Fund,
the Securities Fund, and/or the short term investment fund ("STIF Fund") (the
"Funds"). The Units shall be valued in accordance with the procedures followed
in the Savings Plan.
ARTICLE VII
CORPORATION MATCHING CONTRIBUTION
When the Participant's Excess Savings Amounts are credited to his
Participant's Account, the Corporation will contribute for credit to the account
an amount equal to sixty percent (60%) of such Excess Savings Amounts. The
Corporation Matching Contribution, when added to the Corporation Matching
Contribution made under the Savings Plan, shall not exceed four and eight tenths
percent (4.8%) of the Participant's Weekly Rate of Compensation.
2
<PAGE> 3
ARTICLE VIII
ALLOCATION SPECIFICATIONS
1. Upon becoming a Participant, the Participant shall elect to have the
value of the amount equal to the sum of (1) the Participant's Excess Savings
Amount and (2) the Corporation Matching Contributions credited to his
Participant's Account allocated to the Funds by Filing With The Committee. The
election shall specify the percent of the total allocation in twenty five
percent (25%) increments following the procedures established under the Savings
Plan. A Participant may change the investment specifications and have the value
of all Units credited to his Participant's Account reallocated in accordance
with the procedures established under the Savings Plan.
ARTICLE IX
PAYMENT OF BENEFITS
1. A Participant shall receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the
dollar value of the Units in his Participant's Account coincident with or
immediately following the date of Termination of Employment for any of the
reasons set forth in Section 8.01 of the Savings Plan. Upon termination of
employment for any other reason, a Participant shall receive a cash payment in
an amount equal to the sum of the following:
(a) Amount of Payment
(1) The dollar value of the Units in his Participant's Account credited to
the Weekly Excess Savings Amounts; and
(2) The vested portion of the dollar value of the Units in his
Participant's Account which were credited to Corporation Matching Contributions.
The vested portion of Corporation Matching Contributions shall be determined in
accordance with the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS OF SERVICE VESTED PERCENT
---------------- --------------
<S> <C>
Less than 2 years.............................. 0%
2 years........................................ 25%
3 years........................................ 50%
4 years........................................ 75%
5 years or more................................ 100%
</TABLE>
(3) When a Participant Terminates Employment for reasons other than those
set forth in Section 8.01 of the Savings Plan, the Participant shall forfeit all
Units credited to the Participant's Account to which he is not entitled as a
benefit under the provisions of this Article IX, and the Participant shall have
no further rights in those Units.
(b) Payment Options
(1) When an eligible employee becomes a Participant, he shall File with the
Committee an election for the method of payment of benefits, as provided in
paragraph (b)(2) of this Article IX. The election shall be irrevocable, and is
applicable to the entire amount of the Participant's Account. However, a
Participant may petition the Committee at any time prior to one year before his
retirement to request a change in the method of payment described in paragraph
(b)(2) of this Article IX, which the Committee, at its sole discretion, may
grant.
(2) A Participant may elect, in lieu of a cash payment, that the total
number of Units in his Account be paid to him in five (5), ten (10), fifteen
(15), or twenty (20) equal annual installments beginning on the last day of the
month following the month in which the Participant's employment has been
terminated. The dollar amount of each payment shall be equal to the dollar value
of the Units to be paid in the installment, determined on the Valuation Date
immediately preceding the date payment is due. When a Participant dies before
payments begin, the Participant's method of payment election shall cease and his
beneficiary shall receive a lump sum payment. When a Participant dies on or
after payments begin but before payment of the
3
<PAGE> 4
entire amount due him, the dollar value of the remaining balance of the Units in
the Participant's Account shall be paid in a lump sum to the Participant's
beneficiary. The dollar value of the lump sum payment shall be determined on the
Valuation Date immediately following the Participant's date of death. Election
of the method of payment must be made in writing by Filing With the Committee
when the Participant begins participation in the Plan. The election shall be
irrevocable, as provided in Article V.
(c) Immediate Payout Upon Change in Control
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, all amounts
accumulated and unpaid in each Participant's Account, as determined in paragraph
(a) of this Article IX, shall be paid in a single lump sum within fifteen (15)
calendar days following a Change in Control. Paragraph (b) of this Article IX
regarding Payment Options shall not apply to payments under this paragraph (c)
and any elections made thereunder shall be void.
(2) For purposes of this Plan, a Change in Control shall be deemed to have
occurred if (i) any "person," as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), other
than a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit
plan of Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin") or any of its
subsidiaries, becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the
Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of Lockheed Martin
representing thirty percent (30%) or more of the combined voting power of
Lockheed Martin's then outstanding securities; or (ii) during any period of two
(2) consecutive years (not including any period prior to the adoption of this
paragraph (c)), individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the
Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin, and any new director (other than a
director designated by a person who has entered into an agreement with Lockheed
Martin to effect a transaction described in clause (i) or (iii) of this
paragraph) whose election by the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin or
nomination for election by Lockheed Martin's shareholders was approved by a vote
of at least two-thirds ( 2/3) of the directors then still in office who either
were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination
for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute at
least a majority thereof; or (iii) the shareholders of Lockheed Martin approve a
merger or consolidation of Lockheed Martin with any other corporation, other
than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of
Lockheed Martin outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent
(either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of
the surviving entity) at least eighty percent (80%) of the combined voting power
of the voting securities of Lockheed Martin or such surviving entity outstanding
immediately after such merger or consolidation or (iv) the shareholders of
Lockheed Martin approve a plan of complete liquidation of Lockheed Martin or an
agreement for the sale or disposition by Lockheed Martin of all or substantially
all of Lockheed Martin's assets.
(3) A Change in Control shall not, however, include any transaction which
has been approved by individuals who at the beginning of any period of at least
two (2) consecutive years (not including any period prior to the adoption of
this paragraph (c)) constitute the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin, and
any new director (other than a director designated by a person who has entered
into an agreement with Lockheed Martin to effect a transaction described in
clause (i) or (iii)) whose election by the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin
or nomination for election by Lockheed Martin's shareholders was approved by a
vote of at least two-thirds ( 2/3) of the directors then still in office who
either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or
nomination for election was previously so approved.
(4) This paragraph (c) shall apply only to a Change in Control of Lockheed
Martin and shall not cause immediate payout of any Participant's Account in any
transaction involving Lockheed Martin's sale, liquidation, merger, or other
disposition of any subsidiary.
(5) The Board of Directors may cancel or modify this paragraph (c) at any
time prior to a Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, this
paragraph (c) shall remain in force and effect, and shall not be subject to
cancellation or modification for a period of five (5) years, and any other
provision defining a capitalized term used in this paragraph (c) shall not, for
purposes of this paragraph (c), be subject to cancellation or modification
during the five year period.
4
<PAGE> 5
ARTICLE X
TRUST
Although the Plan is an unfunded plan, the Corporation has established a
trust (the "Trust") pursuant to a trust agreement dated December 22, 1994 by and
between the Corporation and J. P. Morgan California to hold assets, subject to
the claims of the Corporation's creditors in the event of its insolvency, to pay
benefits under this Plan. The Corporation shall no later than nine months
following the close of its fiscal year make contributions to the Trust in an
amount sufficient, when added to the then principal of the Trust and after
consideration of benefits to be paid pursuant to other plans covered by the
Trust, to equal the present value of benefits which have accrued under the Plan
during the preceding fiscal year.
ARTICLE XI
ADMINISTRATION
The Plan shall be administered by the Committee or in cases where
amendments are necessary to implement changes not affecting the overall
functioning of the Plan; and such changes will not, in the judgment of the
Lockheed Corporate Salary Board, substantially alter the nature or expense of
the affected plan, then the power to amend shall also be designated to the
Corporate Salary Board under guidance from counsel. The Committee shall have the
right to construe the Plan, to interpret any provision thereof, to make rules
and regulations relating to the Plan, and to determine any factual question
arising in connection with the Plan's operation after such investigation or
hearing as the Committee may deem appropriate. Any decision made by the
Committee under the provisions of this Article shall be conclusive and binding
on all parties concerned.
ARTICLE XII
AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN
The Board of Directors and/or the Corporate Salary Board shall have the
right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. When Plan is amended or
terminated, a Participant's plan benefits shall not be less than the Plan
benefits to which the Participant would have been entitled if the Participant
had retired immediately prior to the amendment or termination.
ARTICLE XIII
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS
Nothing in the Plan shall be deemed to give any person any right to remain
an employee of the Corporation or affect any right of the Corporation to
terminate a person's employment.
ARTICLE XIV
EFFECTIVE DATE
The effective date of the Plan is January 1, 1984.
5
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.12
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
RETIREMENT PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1987
AS AMENDED AS OF MARCH 10, 1995
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this plan shall be to provide recognition and retirement
compensation to eligible members of the Board of Directors ("Board") of Lockheed
Corporation ("Company") to facilitate the Company's ability to attract, retain,
and reward members of its Board.
II. ELIGIBILITY
Eligibility in this plan shall be limited to members of the Board who are
not employees of the Company who have at least five years of total service on
the Board as a director, and who resign or retire from the Board, or if such
director has also served on the Board of Lockheed Martin Corporation (the
"Lockheed Martin Board"), from the Lockheed Martin Board, in good standing.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, members of the Board on March 14, 1995 with less
than five years of service shall be eligible to receive benefits under this
plan.
III. AMOUNT OF BENEFIT
Each eligible director shall be entitled to an annual retirement benefit
which shall be equal to the annual retainer fee for directors as in effect at
the time of the eligible director's resignation, retirement or other cessation
of service as a member of the Board. For purposes of this calculation the annual
retainer fee shall include any annual amount automatically deposited in a trust
for the purpose of purchasing the Corporation's stock in accordance with the
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Lockheed Corporation. This benefit
shall be paid either monthly or in one lump sum, as provided in Article IV. No
additional amount shall be paid under this Plan for service on any of the
committees of the Board or for service on the Lockheed Martin Board, nor shall
interest be paid on these amounts.
IV. COMMENCEMENT AND DURATION OF BENEFITS
A. Monthly Payments.
Unless a lump sum payment is elected pursuant to paragraph B, benefit
payments will begin on the first day of the month on or after the later of the
date on which an eligible director leaves the Board or the date on which an
eligible director leaves the Lockheed Martin Board (for purposes of this Plan,
the later of such dates shall be the date the eligible director "Retires" or the
date of the eligible director's "Retirement") provided the director is at least
age 65. An eligible director who Retires prior to age 65 shall begin receiving
benefit payments on the first day of the month following the month in which the
director turns 65. Benefits will be paid on the first day of each month
thereafter and will be paid for a period equal to the number of years that the
eligible director served as an outside director of the Company, provided such
director, or spouse thereof, survives for such period. Fractional years of
service will be rounded up to the next higher whole year. In no event shall the
payment period exceed twenty (20) years. Upon the death of the eligible
director, any remaining retirement benefits under this plan will be paid to his
or her spouse according to the same payment schedule as set forth above. If
there is no spouse living at the time of death of the eligible director, no
further payments will be made.
B. Lump Sum Payment Option. In lieu of receipt of monthly payments under
paragraph A above, an eligible director may irrevocably elect to receive in a
single lump sum payment an amount which is the actuarial equivalent of the
monthly benefits described in paragraph A. The actuarial equivalent shall be
1
<PAGE> 2
computed using the interest rate which is one percent (1%) above the rate which
would be used by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to determine the
present value of an immediate lump sum distribution on termination of a pension
plan, as in effect on January 1 of the year in which monthly payments would
otherwise begin under this Plan, and the Lockheed Mortality Tables. The election
must be made within the sixty (60) day period preceding the later of the
director's Retirement or attainment of age sixty five (65), by filing a written
election with the Company's Vice President of Human Resources. Payment will be
made to the eligible director six (6) months following the date monthly payments
would otherwise begin pursuant to paragraph A.
If a director who elects a lump sum payment should die after Retirement but
before the lump sum payment date, the lump sum benefit will be paid on the lump
sum payment date to the director's spouse. If the spouse is not living on the
lump sum payment date, no payment will be made.
C. Death While a Board Member.
If the eligible director should die while still a member of the Board or
the Lockheed Martin Board, the spouse will receive 100% of the benefit to which
the director would have been entitled had the director resigned on the date he
or she died. Monthly payments will commence to the spouse on the earlier of the
date on which the eligible director would have become entitled to receive
payments, or on the first day of the month following the month the spouse
attains age 65, but in no event earlier than the first day of the third month
following the director's death. In lieu of receiving monthly payments, the
surviving spouse may irrevocably elect within sixty (60) days of the director's
death to receive an actuarially equivalent lump sum payment, calculated in
accordance with paragraph B, payable six (6) months after the date monthly
payments to the spouse would otherwise begin. If the spouse is not living at the
time benefits become payable, no payment will be made.
D. Involuntary Termination of Director Status. If an eligible director's
status as a Member of the Board or the Lockheed Martin Board is involuntarily
terminated other than by death, either before or after age 65, within thirty
(30) calendar days following such involuntary change in status there shall be
paid to such director an actuarially equivalent lump sum payment, calculated in
accordance with paragraph B, of the Director's retirement benefit.
V. ADMINISTRATION
The Salary Board of the Company, or the Vice President of Human Resources,
if authorized to act on its behalf, shall have full and final authority to
interpret this plan to make determinations which they believe advisable for the
administration of the plan, to approve ministerial changes or amendments to the
plan, to interpret plan provisions, and to approve changes as may from time to
time be required by law or regulation. All decisions and determinations by the
Salary Board shall be final and binding upon all parties.
If any person entitled to payments under this plan is, in the opinion of
the Salary Board or its designee, incapacitated and unable to use such payments
in his or her own best interest, the Salary Board or its designee may direct
that payments (or any portion) be made to that person's legal guardian or
conservator, or that person's spouse, as an alternative to the payment to the
person unable to use the payments. The Salary Board or its designee shall have
no obligation to supervise the use of such payments, and court-appointed
guardianship or conservatorship may be required.
This Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.
VI. TRUST
Although the Plan is an unfunded plan, the Company has established a trust
(the "Trust") pursuant to a trust agreement dated December 22, 1994 by and
between the Company and J. P. Morgan California to hold assets, subject to the
claims of the Company's creditors in the event of its insolvency, to pay
benefits under this Plan. The Company shall no later than nine months following
the close of its fiscal year make contributions to the Trust in an amount
sufficient, when added to the then principal of the Trust and after
consideration of
2
<PAGE> 3
benefits to be paid pursuant to other plans covered by the Trust, to equal the
present value of benefits which have accrued under the Plan during the preceding
fiscal year, as such amount is determined by an independent actuary.
VII. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN
The Board shall have the right to amend or terminate this Plan at any time.
In the event of Plan amendment or termination, the Plan benefit payable on
account of a retired or deceased director shall not be impaired, and the Plan
benefit of other directors shall not be less than the benefit to which each such
director would have been entitled if he or she had retired immediately prior to
such amendment or termination of the Plan.
3
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 11
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
(IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 25, DECEMBER 26, DECEMBER 27, DECEMBER 29, DECEMBER 30,
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings from continuing operations and
before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle available for
common stock............................ $ 445 $ 422 $ 348 $ 308 $ 335
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Net earnings (loss) available for common
stock................................... $ 445 $ 422 $ (283) $ 308 $ 335
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Applicable common stock shares:
Average outstanding during the period... 62.9 62.2 61.5 63.2 63.2
Weighted average shares issuable upon
exercise of common stock equivalents
outstanding based on the average
market price during the using the
"treasury stock" method............... .7 .7 .2 .2
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Total............................ 63.6 62.9 61.7 63.4 63.2
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Earnings from continuing operations and
before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle per share of common
stock................................... $ 7.00 $6.70 $ 5.65 $4.86 $5.30
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Net earnings (loss) per share of common
stock................................... $ 7.00 $6.70 $(4.58) $4.86 $5.30
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings from continuing operations and
before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle available for
common stock shown above................ $ 445 $ 422 $ 348 $ 308 $ 335
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Net earnings (loss) applicable to common
stock shown above....................... $ 445 $ 422 $ (283) $ 308 $ 335
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Applicable common stock shares:
Average outstanding during period....... 62.9 62.2 61.5 63.2 63.2
Weighted average shares issuable upon
exercise of common stock equivalents
outstanding based on the higher of the
closing or the average market price
during the period using the "treasury
stock" method......................... .9 .9 .2 .2
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Total............................ 63.8 63.1 61.7 63.4 63.2
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Earnings from continuing operations and
before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle per share of common
stock................................... $ 6.97 $6.68 $ 5.65 $4.86 $5.30
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
Net earnings (loss) per share of common
stock................................... $ 6.97 $6.68 $(4.58) $4.86 $5.30
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 12
LOCKHEED CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(IN MILLIONS EXCEPT RATIOS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAX AND CHANGE IN
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE......................................... $695 $676 $549 $474 $430
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
Capitalized interest......................................... 1 0 1 1 1
Interest expense............................................. 156 168 119 118 138
Interest expense for finance subsidiary...................... 1 1 1 1 12
Interest portion of rental expense........................... 34 37 38 41 46
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES............................................ $192 $206 $159 $161 $197
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES EXCLUDING CAPITALIZED INTEREST............. $191 $206 $158 $160 $196
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
EARNINGS PLUS FIXED CHARGES EXCLUDING CAPITALIZED EXPENSE...... $886 $882 $707 $634 $626
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES............................. 4.6 4.3 4.4 3.9 3.2
==== ==== ==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
Listed below are the principal operating divisions and subsidiaries of the
company and the percentage of voting securities of such subsidiaries owned by
the company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE
JURISDICTION IN OF VOTING
WHICH INCORPORATED SECURITIES
OR ORGANIZED OWNED
------------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Divisions:
Lockheed Advanced Development Company
Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company
Lockheed Aircraft Service Company
Lockheed Fort Worth Company
Subsidiaries:
Access Graphics, Inc. Delaware *
CalComp Inc. California **
Lockheed Aeromod Center, Inc. California 100
Lockheed Canada, Inc. Canada 100
Lockheed Commercial Electronics Company Delaware 100
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company Texas 100
Lockheed Environmental Systems and Technology Company Nevada ***
Lockheed Finance Corporation California 100
Lockheed Idaho Technologies Company Idaho 100
Lockheed Information Management Services Company New York 100
Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. California 100
Lockheed Sanders, Inc. Delaware 100
Lockheed Space Operations Company Nevada 100
Lockheed Support Systems, Inc. Oklahoma 100
MountainGate Data Systems, Inc. California 100
</TABLE>
---------------
* 100% owned subsidiary of AGT Holdings Inc., which is a 100% owned
subsidiary of CalComp Inc.
** 100% owned subsidiary of Lockheed Sanders, Inc.
*** 100% owned subsidiary of Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of Lockheed Corporation (Form S-3 No. 33-49327) and in the Registration
Statements of Lockheed Martin Corporation (Form S-3 No. 33-58067) pertaining to
the Lockheed Martin Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan;
(Form S-8 No. 33-58073) pertaining to the Lockheed Martin Directors Deferred
Stock Plan; (Form S-8 No. 58075) pertaining to Lockheed Martin Corporation's
Martin Marietta Corporation Performance Sharing Plan for Puerto Rico Employees;
(Form S-8 No. 58077) pertaining to Lockheed Martin 1995 Omnibus Performance
Award Plan; (Form S-8 No. 58079) pertaining to Lockheed Martin Corporation's
Sandia Corporation Savings and Income Plan and Sandia Corporation Savings and
Security Plan; (Form S-8 No. 33-58081) pertaining to Lockheed Martin
Corporation's Lockheed Corporation Hourly Employees Savings and Stock Investment
Plan Fort Worth and Abilene Divisions; (Form S-8 No. 33-58083) pertaining to
Lockheed Martin Corporation's Martin Marietta Corporation Performance Sharing
Plan; (Form S-8 No. 33-58085) pertaining to Lockheed Martin Corporation's Martin
Marietta Corporation Savings and Investment Plan for Hourly Employees; (Form S-8
No. 33-58089) pertaining to Lockheed Martin Corporation's Martin Marietta Energy
Systems, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan for Salaried Employees, Martin Marietta Energy
Systems, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan for Hourly Employees, and Martin Marietta
Energy Systems, Inc. Savings Plan for Salaried and Hourly Employees; (Form S-8
No. 33-58097) pertaining to Lockheed Martin Corporation's Lockheed Salaried
Employee Savings Plan Plus, Lockheed Hourly Employee Savings Plan Plus, and
Lockheed Space Operations Company Hourly Employee Investment Plan Plus; and
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 33-57645 of our report dated January 31, 1995, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Lockheed Corporation included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 25, 1994.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 27, 1995
