SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. __)
Filed by the Registrant /x/
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
/ / Preliminary Proxy Statement
/ / Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
/x/ Definitive Proxy Statement
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/x/ $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2) or Item
22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A
/ / $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3)
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
<PAGE>
[LOGO]
MARSH & McLENNAN
COMPANIES
1996
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
AND PROXY STATEMENT
<PAGE>
[LOGO]
MARSH & McLENNAN
COMPANIES
Dear Marsh & McLennan Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., which will be held at 10:00 a.m. on
Tuesday, May 21, 1996 in the auditorium on the second floor at 1221 Avenue of
the Americas, New York, New York.
The major items of business, as outlined in this Proxy Statement, will be
the election of six persons to serve as Class II directors and one person to
serve as a Class I director, the approval of an amendment to the Marsh &
McLennan Companies Stock Investment Plan and the ratification of the appointment
of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent public accountants for 1996.
Whether you plan to come to the Annual Meeting or not, your representation
and vote are important and your shares should be voted. Please complete, date,
sign and return the enclosed proxy card promptly.
We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
Very truly yours,
/s/ A.J.C. Smith
Chairman of the Board March 29, 1996
<PAGE>
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
AND
PROXY STATEMENT
OF
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
1166 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036-2774
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the 'Company'), will be held on Tuesday, May 21, 1996 at
10:00 a.m. (local time) in the second floor auditorium at 1221 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, New York for the following purposes:
(1) To elect six persons to serve as Class II directors and one person
to serve as a Class I director;
(2) To approve an amendment to the Marsh & McLennan Companies Stock
Investment Plan;
(3) To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent
public accountants for the Company for its fiscal year ending December 31,
1996; and
(4) To transact such other business as may properly be brought before
the meeting.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 22, 1996 are
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. As of that
date, 72,788,615 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to one
vote on all matters submitted to stockholders. A list of stockholders will be
available for inspection for at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting at
the principal executive offices of the Company at 1166 Avenue of the Americas,
New York, New York.
This proxy solicitation material is being mailed on or about March 29, 1996
to stockholders as of the record date with a copy of the Company's 1995 Annual
Report to Stockholders, which includes financial statements for the period ended
December 31, 1995.
The matters to be acted upon are described in this Notice of Annual Meeting
of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. Proxies will be voted at the Annual
Meeting, or at any adjournment thereof, at which a quorum is present, in
accordance with the directions on the proxy card. The holders of a majority of
the Company's common stock outstanding and entitled to vote who are present
either in person or represented by proxy constitute a quorum for the Annual
Meeting.
Unless otherwise directed in the proxy, the persons named therein will vote
FOR the election of the director nominees listed below, FOR the amendment to the
Marsh & McLennan Companies Stock Investment Plan and FOR the ratification of the
appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent public
accountants for its fiscal year ending December 31, 1996.
<PAGE>
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. 'Plurality' means
that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast 'For' are
elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the
Annual Meeting. Consequently, any shares not voted 'For' a particular director
(whether as a result of a direction to withhold or a broker nonvote) will not be
counted in such director's favor.
All other matters to be acted on at the Annual Meeting require the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present at the meeting to
constitute the action of the stockholders. In accordance with Delaware law,
abstentions will, while broker nonvotes will not, be treated as present for
purposes of the preceding sentence. A broker nonvote is a proxy submitted by a
broker in which the broker fails to vote on behalf of a client on a particular
matter for lack of instruction when such instruction is required by the New York
Stock Exchange.
As of the date hereof, the Board of Directors knows of no other business
that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If other
business shall properly come before the Annual Meeting, including any proposal
submitted by a stockholder which was omitted from this Proxy Statement in
accordance with applicable provisions of the federal securities laws, the
persons named in the proxy will vote according to their best judgment.
DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes. The regular terms of
office for the Class II, Class III and Class I directors expire at the 1996,
1997 and 1998 annual meetings of stockholders, respectively. Six persons are to
be elected at the Annual Meeting to hold office as Class II directors for a term
of three years and until their respective successors are elected and qualified,
except that Mr. Robert Clements, who has served as a director since 1981,
intends to serve only until October 1997. One person is to be elected at the
Annual Meeting to hold office as a Class I director for a term expiring in 1998
and until his successor is elected and qualified. The remaining Class I and the
Class III directors will not be elected at the Annual Meeting as their
respective terms will continue.
Each director has served as a director of the Company since the year
indicated. Mr. Richard E. Heckert and Mr. Robert M.G. Husson, Class I directors,
are retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Philip L. Wroughton, a
Class II director, is also retiring from the Board and is not standing for re-
election. Mr. Jeffrey W. Greenberg is a new nominee standing for election as a
Class II director and Mr. Robert F. Erburu is a new nominee standing for
election as a Class I director.
It is intended that shares represented by the proxies will be voted for the
election of all of the Class II nominees and the Class I nominee listed below.
In the unexpected event that any nominee should become unavailable to serve as a
director prior to the Annual Meeting for any reason, the persons designated as
proxies reserve full discretion to cast their votes for another person whom the
Board of Directors of the Company might designate in substitution.
2
<PAGE>
NOMINEE FOR CLASS I DIRECTOR
(TERM EXPIRING IN 1998)
[PHOTO] ROBERT F. ERBURU NEW NOMINEE
Mr. Erburu, age 65, retired as Chairman of the Board of The Times Mirror
Company, a Los Angeles-based news and information company, on January 1, 1996, a
position he had held since 1986. Mr. Erburu served as President of The Times
Mirror Company from 1974 through 1986 and from 1994 to 1995, and as Chief
Executive Officer from 1981 to 1995. Mr. Erburu continues to serve as a director
of The Times Mirror Company. He is also a director of the Tejon Ranch Company,
Cox Communications, Inc., the Pacific Council on International Policy, the Tomas
Rivera Center, the Los Angeles Annenberg Metropolitan Project and the Skirball
Institute of American Values. He is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The
Huntington Library, Art Collections and Botanical Gardens and of the J. Paul
Getty Trust, as well as a trustee of the National Gallery of Art, The Flora and
William Hewlett Foundation and The Ahmanson Foundation, and a Fellow of the
American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Mr. Erburu is also a member of the
Business Council.
NOMINEES FOR CLASS II DIRECTORS
(TERMS EXPIRING IN 1999)
[PHOTO] ROBERT CLEMENTS DIRECTOR SINCE 1981
Mr. Clements, age 63, became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Marsh &
McLennan Risk Capital Corp., a subsidiary of the Company ('MMRCC'), in 1994.
Prior thereto he served as President of the Company from 1992, having been Vice
Chairman during 1991. Mr. Clements will be retiring from the Company and
resigning as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MMRCC on April 1, 1996,
whereupon he will become an advisor to MMRCC. He joined Marsh & McLennan, Ltd.,
a Canadian subsidiary of the Company, in 1959. Mr. Clements is Chairman and a
director of Risk Capital Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiary, Risk Capital
Reinsurance Company, and a director of EXEL Limited. He is also an Overseer of
the Institute for Civil Justice and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The
College of Insurance.
3
<PAGE>
[PHOTO] JEFFREY W. GREENBERG NEW NOMINEE
Mr. Greenberg, age 44, is an executive of Marsh & McLennan Risk Capital Corp., a
subsidiary of the Company, which he joined in 1995. He is expected to become its
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on April 1, 1996. From 1978 to 1995, he was
employed by American International Group, including serving from 1991 as
executive vice president with responsibility for its domestic brokerage group.
Mr. Greenberg is a director of ACE Limited and a trustee of Brown University,
the Spence School in New York City and the Children's Oncology Society of New
York.
[PHOTO] RICHARD S. HICKOK** DIRECTOR SINCE 1983
Mr. Hickok, age 70, is Chairman of Hickok Associates, Inc., a financial
consulting firm. He retired in 1983 from KMG Main Hurdman, Certified Public
Accountants, where he had been Chairman. Mr. Hickok is a director of Alpine Lace
Brands, Inc., Comstock Resources Inc., Projectavision, Inc. and Marcam
Corporation.
[PHOTO] DAVID D. HOLBROOK DIRECTOR SINCE 1992
Mr. Holbrook, age 57, became Chairman of Marsh & McLennan, Incorporated, a
subsidiary of the Company, in 1995, having served as its President from 1988 and
its Co-Chief Executive Officer from 1992 to 1994. He joined Marsh & McLennan in
1960. Mr. Holbrook is Chairman of the Board of Directors of The Theatre
Development Fund in New York City and a director of Security Equity Life
Insurance Company, Security Mutual Life Insurance Company and World Insurance
Network, Ltd. He is also a trustee of The Millbrook School, Millbrook, N.Y., St.
Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center in New York City and the Business Council for
the United Nations, and an Advisor to Outward Bound, U.S.A.
4
<PAGE>
[PHOTO] ADELE SMITH SIMMONS** DIRECTOR SINCE 1978
Mrs. Simmons, age 54, has been President of the John D. and Catherine T.
MacArthur Foundation since 1989. She is a director of First Chicago/NBD
Corporation, the Synergos Institute and the Union of Concerned Scientists.
[PHOTO] A. J. C. SMITH* DIRECTOR SINCE 1977
Mr. Smith, age 61, has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company since 1992. He served as President from 1986 to 1992. He joined
William M. Mercer Limited, a Canadian subsidiary of the Company, in 1961. Mr.
Smith is a trustee of the various mutual funds managed by Putnam Investment
Management, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. He is also a member of the Board
of Trustees of the Central Park Conservancy and the Carnegie Hall Society, both
in New York City.
CONTINUING CLASS III DIRECTORS
(TERMS EXPIRING IN 1997)
[PHOTO] PETER COSTER DIRECTOR SINCE 1988
Mr. Coster, age 56, is President of Mercer Consulting Group, Inc. and of William
M. Mercer Companies, Inc., subsidiaries of the Company. He joined Mercer in 1984
upon its acquisition of a U.K. benefits consulting firm that Mr. Coster had
joined in 1962.
5
<PAGE>
[PHOTO] LAWRENCE J. LASSER DIRECTOR SINCE 1987
Mr. Lasser, age 53, is President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam
Investments, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. He joined Putnam in 1969. Mr.
Lasser is a trustee of the various mutual funds managed by Putnam Investment
Management, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. He is a director of
INROADS/Central New England Inc. and a member of the Boards of Overseers of the
Museum of Fine Arts and of The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, all in Boston.
He is also a trustee of Beth Israel Hospital in Boston and of the Buckingham,
Browne and Nichols School in Cambridge, MA.
[PHOTO] RICHARD M. MORROW** DIRECTOR SINCE 1991
Mr. Morrow, age 70, served as Chairman of the Board of Westinghouse Electric
Corporation during part of 1993. He retired as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Amoco Corporation in 1991. Mr. Morrow is a director of Potlatch
Corporation, Seagull Energy Corporation and Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
He is also a trustee of the University of Chicago and Rush-Presbyterian-St.
Lukes Medical Center in Chicago.
[PHOTO] JOHN T. SINNOTT DIRECTOR SINCE 1992
Mr. Sinnott, age 56, became President and Chief Executive Officer of Marsh &
McLennan, Incorporated, a subsidiary of the Company, in 1995, having previously
served as President from 1990 and Co-Chief Executive from 1992. He joined Marsh
& McLennan in 1963. Mr. Sinnott is a trustee of the Insurance Institute of
America.
6
<PAGE>
[PHOTO] FRANK J. TASCO* ** DIRECTOR SINCE 1979
Mr. Tasco, age 68, retired in 1992 as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, a position he had held since 1986. From December 1993 to
December 1994, he served as Chairman of Borden, Inc. Mr. Tasco is a director of
The Travelers Corporation, Mid Ocean Limited, New York Telephone Company, and
New England Telephone and Telegraph Company.
[PHOTO] R.J. VENTRES*** DIRECTOR SINCE 1988
Mr. Ventres, age 71, is a director of Schering-Plough Corp. and a trustee of St.
Clare's Hospital and Health Center in New York City. He retired as Chief
Executive Officer of Borden, Inc. in 1991, as Chairman in 1992 and as Chairman
of its Executive Committee in 1993.
CONTINUING CLASS I DIRECTORS
(TERMS EXPIRING IN 1998)
[PHOTO] LEWIS W. BERNARD*** DIRECTOR SINCE 1992
Mr. Bernard, age 54, is Chairman of Classroom, Inc., a non-profit educational
corporation. He retired in 1991 from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. where for almost
30 years he held numerous positions, most recently as chief administrative and
financial officer. Mr. Bernard is a trustee or director of the American Museum
of Natural History and the Central Park Conservancy in New York City and of The
Commonwealth Fund, the Educational Broadcasting Corporation, the Harvard
Management Company, and the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation.
7
<PAGE>
[PHOTO] RICHARD H. BLUM DIRECTOR SINCE 1985
Mr. Blum, age 57, served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Guy
Carpenter & Company, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, from 1990 until January
1996, when he became an executive of the Company with responsibility for leading
the integration of insurance broking, reinsurance intermediary, risk management
and insurance program management capabilities. He joined Carpenter in 1958. Mr.
Blum is a trustee of The College of Insurance.
[PHOTO] FRANK J. BORELLI DIRECTOR SINCE 1988
Mr. Borelli, age 60, has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company since 1984. He is a director of The Interpublic Group of
Companies, Inc., Mid Ocean Limited and United Water Resources, Inc. Mr. Borelli
is Vice Chairman and a director of the Financial Executives Institute, a
director of the Private Sector Council, and a trustee of the New York City
Chapter of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and the Nyack Hospital.
[PHOTO] RAY J. GROVES** DIRECTOR SINCE 1994
Mr. Groves, age 60, is Chairman of Legg Mason Merchant Banking, Inc. He retired
in 1994 from Ernst & Young where he had held numerous positions for 37 years,
including the last 17 years as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. He is a
director of Consolidated Natural Gas Company and RJR Nabisco, Inc. Mr. Groves is
a member of the Board of Trustees of the Business Council of the United Nations
and of the New York Public Policy Institute. He is also a managing director and
treasurer of the Metropolitan Opera Association.
8
<PAGE>
[PHOTO] GEORGE PUTNAM DIRECTOR SINCE 1987
Mr. Putnam, age 69, is Chairman of Putnam Investment Management, Inc., a
subsidiary of the Company, and is Chairman of the Board of Trustees and
President of the various mutual funds managed by Putnam. He is a director of The
Boston Company, Inc., The Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Company, Freeport-McMoRan,
Inc., General Mills, Inc., Houghton Mifflin Company, McMoRan Oil & Gas Inc.,
Copper & Gold, Inc. and Rockefeller Group, Inc. Mr. Putnam is also Chairman of
the WGBH Educational Foundation, President of McLean Hospital, a trustee of the
Museum of Fine Arts (Boston), the Boston Museum of Science, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Trustees of Reservations and the National Center for
Non-Profit Boards, and an Overseer of Northeastern University.
- - ------------------
* Member of the Executive Committee, of which Mr. Smith is Chairman. Mr.
Heckert, a director who is retiring at the Annual Meeting, also has been a
member.
** Member of the Audit Committee, of which Mr. Hickok is Chairman.
*** Member of the Compensation Committee, of which Mr. Heckert, a director who
is retiring at the Annual Meeting, is Chairman.
The Executive Committee has all the powers of the Board of Directors, when
it is not in session, in the management of the business and affairs of the
Company, except as otherwise provided in the Company's by-laws or in resolutions
of the Board of Directors and under applicable law. The Executive Committee held
two meetings during 1995.
The Audit Committee submits recommendations to the Board of Directors with
respect to the selection of the Company's independent public accountants and on
any other matters it deems appropriate. It reviews the annual financial
statements of the Company with the Company's independent public accountants, the
practices and procedures adopted by the Company in the preparation of such
statements, and the independent public accountants' annual scope of audit. The
Audit Committee is required to meet at least annually with such accountants and
at any time when considered appropriate by the Audit Committee or such
accountants. The Audit Committee held seven meetings during 1995.
The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of the Company's
Chief Executive Officer, approves the compensation of other senior executives of
the Company and approves the retention by the Company of consultants on matters
relating to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and senior
executives of the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee oversees
general compensation policies and practices and administers the Company's
stock-based award plans. No member of the Compensation Committee may be an
employee of the Company or be eligible to receive grants under any plan that the
Compensation Committee administers. The Compensation Committee held nine
meetings during 1995.
The Board of Directors conducted five meetings during 1995. The average
attendance by directors at the meetings of the Board of Directors and committees
thereof was 96% and all directors other than Mr. Husson attended at least 75% of
the meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which they served.
9
<PAGE>
DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION
As compensation for their services, Messrs. Bernard, Groves, Heckert,
Hickok, Morrow, Putnam, Tasco and Ventres, and Mrs. Simmons, each receive, and
upon election Mr. Erburu will receive, a retainer of $40,000 per year. These
directors also receive a fee of $1,000, and reimbursement of related expenses
for each meeting of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof they attend.
The chairman of each committee (other than Mr. Smith as Chairman of the
Executive Committee) receives an additional retainer of $5,000 per year; other
members of committees receive an additional retainer of $2,000 per year.
Under the terms of the Company's Directors Stock Compensation Plan, which
was approved by the stockholders at the 1995 Annual Meeting, the directors
receive twenty-five percent of the basic retainer in shares of the Company's
stock at the fair market value thereof on each June 1. The balance of their
compensation (including attendance fees and committee retainers) is paid in
shares of the Company's stock or cash as the director elects. The directors may
defer receipt of all or a portion of their compensation to be paid in shares
until the year following either their date of retirement from the Board or a
specified earlier date. Upon retirement from the Board, these directors become
advisory directors, available for consultation with management, and receive
until age 80 an annual amount equal to their Board retainer at the time of
retirement.
The remaining directors receive no specific compensation for their services
as directors or members of any committee.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Marsh & McLennan Risk Capital Corp. ('MMRCC'), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company, has employment agreements with Mr. Robert Clements, its Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer (the 'Clements Agreement') and with Mr. Jeffrey W.
Greenberg, a new nominee for the Board who is expected to replace Mr. Clements
as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MMRCC on April 1, 1996 (the
'Greenberg Agreement'). The Company has guaranteed MMRCC's obligations under
these agreements.
The Clements Agreement, until recently amended as described below, provided
for Mr. Clements to be employed by MMRCC through September 30, 1997 at a base
salary of $800,000 per year, a stipend of $450,000 per year for services to the
Company, and minimum bonuses of $800,000 for the years 1994 through 1996 and
$600,000 for 1997. In addition, Mr. Clements is entitled to certain performance
payments based on the extent to which the annual rate of return on The Trident
Partnership, L.P., a Cayman Islands limited partnership for which MMRCC is an
investment advisor ('Trident'), exceeds 15%. The Company and Mr. Clements are in
discussion concerning additional compensation in connection with his role in the
establishment in 1995 of Risk Capital Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded
reinsurance holding company.
Mr. Clements will retire as an employee on April 1, 1996. In recognition of
the change in Mr. Clements' status, the Clements Agreement has been amended to
provide that he or an entity employing him will become an investment advisor to
MMRCC from April 1, 1996 through September 30, 1997 for a fee at the rate of
$2,250,000 per year. Thereafter, for the two-year period ending September 30,
1999, Mr. Clements or such entity is to provide consulting services to MMRCC,
the fee for the first year of such period to be $1,000,000 and for the second
year to be as agreed to by the parties in good faith reflecting business
conditions at the time.
10
<PAGE>
The Clements Agreement provides that if Mr. Clements' position is
terminated by MMRCC (other than for cause or disability) or by Mr. Clements for
'Good Reason' (as defined below), he or such entity will be entitled to receive
the fees that would have been received had the termination not occurred, as well
as the Trident performance payments described above.
Under the Greenberg Agreement, the term of which expires on September 30,
2000 (and, unless notice is given not later than October 1 of the preceding
year, will be extended for annual periods), Mr. Greenberg receives an initial
salary of $100,000 per month from October 1, 1995 until he becomes Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of MMRCC. In addition, Mr. Greenberg received a signing
bonus of $300,000, a deferred bonus of $300,000, an award of 20,000 shares of
restricted stock of the Company vesting in 20% annual increments beginning
October 1, 1996 and stock options for 50,000 shares of Company stock at an
exercise price equal to the market value at the date of grant, which become
exercisable 25% a year beginning October 1, 1996. The Greenberg Agreement also
provides that Mr. Greenberg is to be nominated for election as a director of the
Company at the 1996 Annual Meeting.
Upon Mr. Greenberg becoming Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MMRCC,
expected to occur on April 1, 1996, his salary will be $750,000 per year. Mr.
Greenberg will also be entitled to certain performance payments based on the
extent of the Company's investment return and fees from Trident relating to the
period from October 1, 1995 until he no longer is Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of MMRCC.
Mr. Greenberg will be eligible to participate in the Company's Senior
Management Incentive Compensation Plan and retirement and welfare plans. He is
also entitled to receive annually (i) restricted stock awards of the Company
with a value equal to 25% of his base salary vesting on the third anniversary of
the date of grant, (ii) restricted stock awards with a value equal to 40% of his
base salary vesting on the January 1 next following the tenth anniversary of the
date of grant and (iii) options to acquire a minimum of 20,000 shares of Company
stock with an exercise price equal to the market value of such stock on the date
of grant, which become exercisable 25% a year beginning one year from the date
of grant.
If Mr. Greenberg's employment is terminated by MMRCC (other than for cause
or disability) or if he terminates his employment for 'Good Reason', Mr.
Greenberg will be entitled to receive his base salary for a period of two years
after the termination of employment, as well as annual bonuses (at the annual
rate of not less than $750,000) and continuation of benefits for such period. In
addition, he will be entitled to full vesting of all previously granted stock
option and restricted stock awards and to the performance payments on the basis
described above.
'Good Reason' is defined in both Agreements generally to include a
reduction in compensation; the failure to continue the individual in his
positions during the employment period; a change in duties materially
inconsistent with the status of those positions; a change in control of the
Company (as described in footnote 2 to the 'Summary Compensation Table' below)
or of MMRCC (defined to mean that the Company no longer owns at least 50% of
MMRCC); and, under the Greenberg Agreement, Mr. Greenberg's voluntary
termination in 1999 under specified circumstances (in which case, he would
receive, in lieu of his base salary and bonus for two years as described above,
a cash lump sum of $500,000).
11
<PAGE>
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
The following table reflects as of February 29, 1996 (except with respect
to interests in the Company's Stock Investment Plan and Stock Investment
Supplemental Plan, which are as of December 31, 1995) the number of shares of
common stock which each director, each nominee and each named executive officer
has reported as owning beneficially, and which all directors, nominees and
executive officers of the Company have reported as owning beneficially as a
group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP(1)
-----------------------------------------------------
OTHER
SOLE VOTING THAN SOLE SUBJECT TO
AND VOTING AND EXERCISABLE
INVESTMENT INVESTMENT STOCK
NAME POWER POWER(2) OPTIONS TOTAL
- - --------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Lewis W. Bernard......................................... 1,000 2,066 -- 3,066
Richard H. Blum.......................................... 4,400 99,945 61,500 165,845
Frank J. Borelli......................................... 24,335 39,994 62,500 126,829
Robert Clements.......................................... 4,980 51,290 130,000 186,270
Peter Coster............................................. 3,006 35,336 78,000 116,342
Robert F. Erburu......................................... -- -- -- --
Jeffrey W. Greenberg..................................... -- 20,000 -- 20,000
Ray J. Groves............................................ -- 1,651 -- 1,651
Richard E. Heckert....................................... 500 595 -- 1,095
Richard S. Hickok........................................ 900 3,944 -- 4,844
David D. Holbrook........................................ 23,015 44,029 61,250 128,294
Robert M.G. Husson....................................... 200 250,240 -- 250,440
Lawrence J. Lasser....................................... -- 92,200 82,500 174,700
Richard M. Morrow........................................ 1,000 3,371 -- 4,371
George Putnam............................................ 152,168 28,211 -- 180,379
Adele Smith Simmons...................................... 72,500 48,685 -- 121,185
John T. Sinnott.......................................... 10,830 44,971 61,250 117,051
A.J.C. Smith............................................. 100,371 95,851 189,000 385,222
Frank J. Tasco........................................... 76,721 35,355 180,000 292,076
R.J. Ventres............................................. 5,126 -- -- 5,126
Philip L. Wroughton...................................... 11,519 23,512 77,500 112,531
All directors, nominees and executive
officers as a group, including
the above (23 individuals)............................. 510,780 945,089 1,028,000 2,483,869
</TABLE>
(footnotes on following page)
12
<PAGE>
- - ------------
(1) As of February 29, 1996, no director, nominee or named executive officer
beneficially owned more than 1% of the outstanding common stock, and all
directors, nominees and executive officers as a group beneficially owned
approximately 3.29% of the outstanding common stock.
(2) Reflects the number of shares of common stock (i) that are held in the form
of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units that may in the
future vest to such individuals, (ii) that are held indirectly for the
benefit of such individuals, or jointly, or directly or indirectly for
certain members of such individuals' families, with respect to which
beneficial ownership of shares may be, in certain cases, disclaimed, (iii)
that represent such individuals' interests as of December 31, 1995 in the
Company's Stock Investment Plan and Stock Investment Supplemental Plan but
not any such interests which may have accrued since that date and (iv) that
represent such individuals' interests in shares deferred under the Company's
Directors Stock Compensation Plan.
The following table reflects the number of shares of common stock
beneficially owned by persons known to the Company to own more than 5% of the
outstanding shares:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND
NATURE OF PERCENT OF COMMON
BENEFICIAL STOCK OUTSTANDING AT
NAME AND ADDRESS OWNERSHIP DECEMBER 31, 1995
- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Marsh & McLennan Companies Stock Investment Plan(1) ..................... 4,660,295 6.40%
1166 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Invesco PLC(2)........................................................... 5,312,518 7.30%
</TABLE>
- - ------------
(1) Under the provisions of the Stock Investment Plan, voting rights are passed
through to the employees in proportion to their interests. Unvoted shares
will generally be voted by the trustee in proportion to the shares voted.
Shares held in the Plan are registered in the name of the Plan's trustee and
not in the names of the individual participants. Of the 4,660,295 shares
held in the Plan at December 31, 1995, 24,791 or 0.5% were held for
directors and executive officers of the Company and are included in the
security ownership table above.
(2) Based upon the number of shares listed in a Schedule 13G filed by Invesco
PLC, dated February 2, 1996, on behalf of itself and affiliated entities.
13
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth cash and other compensation paid or accrued
for services rendered in 1995, 1994 and 1993 to the Chief Executive Officer and
each of the five most highly compensated executive officers of the Company
(other than the Chief Executive Officer) whose cash compensation exceeded
$100,000.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION ----------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------ RESTRICTED SECURITIES
OTHER ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND COMPENSATION AWARDS OPTIONS COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY ($) BONUS ($) ($)(1) ($)(2) (#) ($)(3)
- - -------------------------- ---- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A. J. C. Smith 1995 1,125,000 775,000 337,348 1,339,208 50,000 45,000
Chairman and Chief 1994 1,050,000 775,000 276,406 1,149,659 -- 42,000
Executive Officer 1993 1,000,000 675,000 82,911 449,400 100,000 40,000
Marsh & McLennan
Companies, Inc.
Lawrence J. Lasser 1995 820,000 5,000,000 -- 4,537,125* 15,000 123,000
President 1994 820,000 10,500,000* -- 368,438 -- 123,000
Putnam Investments, 1993 770,000 3,200,000 -- 346,413 50,000 3,115,500
Inc.
Peter Coster 1995 625,000 350,000 130,037 422,780 15,000 25,000
President 1994 595,000 280,000 149,822 375,244 -- 23,800
Mercer Consulting 1993 575,000 210,000 80,346 262,150 40,000 22,999
Group, Inc.
Richard H. Blum 1995 605,000 300,000 322,872 570,121 15,000 24,200
Chairman 1994 575,000 275,000 19,819 530,460 -- 23,000
Guy Carpenter & 1993 540,000 250,000 -- 243,425 30,000 21,599
Company, Inc.
David D. Holbrook 1995 560,000 350,000 293,861 289,946 15,000 22,400
Chairman 1994 525,000 315,000 146,093 237,438 -- 21,000
Marsh & McLennan, 1993 515,000 225,000 57,903 234,063 35,000 20,600
Incorporated
John T. Sinnott 1995 560,000 350,000 191,468 289,946 15,000 22,400
President and Chief 1994 525,000 315,000 138,501 237,438 -- 21,000
Executive Officer 1993 515,000 225,000 51,994 234,063 35,000 20,600
Marsh & McLennan,
Incorporated
</TABLE>
- - ------------
(*) Of Mr. Lasser's 1995 restricted stock award and bonus for 1994,
approximately 90% of the restricted stock award and two-thirds of the bonus
are non-recurring amounts reflecting (a) Mr. Lasser's role in the continued
exceptional financial results of Putnam Investments, Inc. and its
contribution to Company stockholder value, (b) Putnam's market share growth
and profitability relative to publicly-
14
<PAGE>
owned investment management companies and (c) the compensation of chief
executives of Putnam's competitors.
(1) Represents the amount of payments in applicable years to the affected
individuals to cover tax liabilities arising from the funding of annuities
under the Benefit Equalization and Supplemental Retirement Programs, which
are part of the United States retirement program.
(2) At December 31, 1995, each individual in the Summary Compensation Table had
outstanding restricted stock units with an aggregate value as follows: Mr.
Smith, 22,820 units worth $2,025,275; Mr. Lasser, 31,900 units worth
$2,831,125; Mr. Coster, 3,080 units worth $273,350; Mr. Blum, 10,246 units
worth $909,333; Mr. Holbrook, 2,990 units worth $265,363; and Mr. Sinnott,
2,990 units worth $265,363. Holders of restricted stock units receive
dividend equivalents that are equal in value to dividends paid on the
outstanding shares of common stock and such units generally vest three years
from the date of grant. Vesting of such units may be accelerated upon a
change of control. 'Change in Control' of the Company means generally any
'person' owning securities with 50% or more of the voting power of the
Company; within a two-year period (with certain exceptions) a change in
directors constituting a majority of the Board of Directors; a merger or
consolidation of the Company resulting in the Company's stockholders not
owning securities with 50% or more of the voting power of the surviving
entity; or an agreement for the sale or disposition of all or substantially
all of the Company's assets.
At December 31, 1995, each individual in the Summary Compensation Table had
outstanding shares of restricted stock with an aggregate value as follows:
Mr. Smith, 57,300 shares worth $5,085,375; Mr. Lasser, 65,300 shares worth
$5,795,375; Mr. Coster, 25,960 shares worth $2,303,950; Mr. Blum, 36,270
shares worth $3,218,963; Mr. Holbrook, 26,700 shares worth $2,369,625; and
Mr. Sinnott, 26,700 shares worth $2,369,625. Holders of shares of restricted
stock receive the same dividends as those paid on the outstanding shares of
common stock and such shares generally vest on the January 1 next following
the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. Vesting of such shares may be
accelerated upon a change of control (as described in the preceding
paragraph).
Under the Special Severance Pay Plan, holders of restricted stock or awards
in lieu of restricted stock with at least 10 years of service will receive
payment in cash or shares of stock upon forfeiture of their award if their
employment with the Company terminates. The amount of such payment is based
on years of service, with the individual receiving up to a maximum of 90% of
the value of the restricted shares after 25 years of service, and is subject
to execution of a non-solicitation agreement.
(3) Represents for 1995 (a) Company matching contributions under the Stock
Investment Plan of $6,000 for each of Messrs. Coster, Blum and Holbrook and
$4,620 for Mr. Sinnott, and under the Stock Investment Supplemental Plan of
$45,000 for Mr. Smith, $19,000 for Mr. Coster, $18,200 for Mr. Blum, $16,400
for Mr. Holbrook and $17,780 for Mr. Sinnott and (b) contributions by Putnam
Investments, Inc. of $22,500 to the Putnam Profit Sharing Retirement Plan
and $100,500 to the Putnam Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for Mr.
Lasser. In addition, Mr. Lasser received in 1993 a special payment of $3
million.
15
<PAGE>
STOCK OPTION GRANTS IN 1995
The following table sets forth certain information concerning stock options
granted during 1995 by the Company to the Chief Executive Officer and each of
the five most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (other than
the Chief Executive Officer).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS(1) POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
------------------------------------------------- VALUE AT ASSUMED
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
SECURITIES OPTIONS PRICE APPRECIATION
UNDERLYING GRANTED EXERCISE FOR OPTION TERM(2)
OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES PRICE EXPIRATION -----------------------------
NAME GRANTED IN 1995 ($/SH) DATE 5% ($) 10% ($)
- - ------------------------------- ---------- ------------ -------- ---------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A.J.C. Smith................... 50,000 4.4 78.5625 5/15/05 2,470,377 6,260,420
Lawrence J. Lasser............. 15,000 1.3 78.5625 5/15/05 741,113 1,878,126
Peter Coster................... 15,000 1.3 78.5625 5/15/05 741,113 1,878,126
Richard H. Blum................ 15,000 1.3 78.5625 5/15/05 741,113 1,878,126
David D. Holbrook.............. 15,000 1.3 78.5625 5/15/05 741,113 1,878,126
John T. Sinnott................ 15,000 1.3 78.5625 5/15/05 741,113 1,878,126
MMC Stockholders(3)............ 3,595,573,442 9,111,889,051
</TABLE>
- - ------------
(1) The options described above are non-qualified options that become
exercisable 25% a year beginning one year from May 16, 1995, the date of
grant. The exercise price of these options may be paid in cash or in shares
of common stock, including shares of restricted stock. In the event of a
change in control of the Company (as described in footnote 2 to the 'Summary
Compensation Table' above), all stock options will become fully exercisable
and vested, and any restrictions contained in the terms and conditions of
the option grants shall lapse. If any payments made in connection with a
change in control are subject to the excise tax imposed under the Federal
tax laws, the Company will increase the option holder's payment as necessary
to restore such option holder to the same after-tax position had the excise
tax not been imposed.
(2) The dollar amounts are the result of calculations at the 5% and 10% growth
rates set by the Securities and Exchange Commission; the rates are not
intended to be a forecast of future stock price appreciation. A zero percent
stock price growth rate will result in a zero gain for optionees.
(3) The dollar amounts reflected herein are included for comparative purposes to
show the gain that would be achieved by the holders of the outstanding
common stock at the assumed stock price appreciation rates at the end of the
10-year term of the options granted in 1995 at an exercise price of
$78.5625.
16
<PAGE>
AGGREGATED STOCK OPTION EXERCISES IN 1995 AND
STOCK OPTION VALUE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995
The following table sets forth certain information concerning stock options
exercised during 1995 by the Chief Executive Officer and each of the five most
highly compensated executive officers of the Company (other than the Chief
Executive Officer) and the number and value of specified unexercised options at
December 31, 1995. The value of unexercised in-the-money stock options at
December 31, 1995 shown below is presented pursuant to SEC rules and is based on
the December 29, 1995 closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange of $88.75 per share. The actual amount, if any, realized upon exercise
of stock options will depend upon the market price of the common stock relative
to the exercise price per share at the time the stock option is exercised. There
is no assurance that the values of unexercised in-the-money stock options
reflected in this table will be realized. There were no options exercised in
1995 by any of the individuals listed in the table below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
SHARES DECEMBER 31, 1995 DECEMBER 31, 1995
ACQUIRED VALUE ---------------------------- ----------------------------
ON EXERCISE REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
NAME (#) ($) (#) (#) ($) ($)
- - ----------------------------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
A.J.C. Smith................. -- -- 180,375 100,000 1,837,469 509,375
Lawrence J. Lasser........... -- -- 70,000 40,000 583,125 152,813
Peter Coster................. -- -- 68,000 35,000 570,750 152,813
Richard H. Blum.............. -- -- 75,000 30,000 1,271,063 152,813
David D. Holbrook............ -- -- 52,500 32,500 411,875 152,813
John T. Sinnott.............. -- -- 55,500 32,500 476,375 152,813
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES RETIREMENT PROGRAM
The Company maintains a United States retirement program consisting of the
Marsh & McLennan Companies Retirement Plan, a non-qualified Benefit Equalization
Program and a non-qualified Supplemental Retirement Program.
The following table shows the estimated annual straight-life annuity
benefit payable (or in the case of those covered by the Benefit Equalization and
Supplemental Retirement Programs, the before-tax equivalents of the after-tax
benefits received) under these retirement programs to employees with the
specified Maximum Average Salary (average salary over the 60 consecutive months
of employment that
17
<PAGE>
produces the highest average) and specified years of service upon retirement at
age 65, after giving effect to adjustments for Social Security benefits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS OF SERVICE
MAXIMUM --------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE SALARY 20 25 30 35 40
- - ----------------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 500,000...................................... $188,019 $235,024 $275,024 $300,024 $325,024
$ 600,000...................................... $228,019 $285,024 $333,024 $363,024 $393,024
$ 700,000...................................... $268,019 $335,024 $391,024 $426,024 $461,024
$ 800,000...................................... $308,019 $385,024 $449,024 $489,024 $529,024
$ 900,000...................................... $348,019 $435,024 $507,024 $552,024 $597,024
$1,000,000..................................... $388,019 $485,024 $565,024 $615,024 $665,024
$1,100,000..................................... $428,019 $535,024 $623,024 $678,024 $733,024
$1,200,000..................................... $468,019 $585,024 $681,024 $741,024 $801,024
</TABLE>
The compensation of participants used to calculate the retirement benefit
consists of regular salary as disclosed in the 'Salary' column of the Summary
Compensation Table and excludes bonuses and other forms of compensation not
regularly received. For the six individuals named above, other than Mr. Lasser
who participates in the Putnam Profit Sharing and related plans and not in the
Company's U.S. retirement program, the 1995 compensation used to calculate the
Maximum Average Salary and the number of years of credited service are as
follows: Mr. Smith, $1,125,000, 33 years; Mr. Coster, $625,000, 34 years; Mr.
Blum, $605,000, 38 years; Mr. Holbrook, $560,000, 36 years; and Mr. Sinnott,
$560,000, 33 years.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY, POLICIES AND PLANS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Company is a professional services firm with businesses having distinct
economic characteristics, marketplaces and operating conditions. The leadership
position attained over time by the Company's operating subsidiaries in their
respective businesses in terms of services rendered, market share, revenue,
profitability and rate of growth has been earned largely through the selection,
training and development of top caliber executive, managerial and professional
talent. Ongoing investment in the firm's human capital has produced favorable
long-term returns to Company stockholders. Therefore, it is critical to the
ongoing success of the Company that its executives continue to be among the most
highly qualified and talented available in their respective businesses to lead
the organization in the creation of stockholder value.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, all of whose members
are disinterested outside directors, is charged by the Company's by-laws with
ensuring that the Company's compensation
18
<PAGE>
philosophy and policies, which are intended to attract, retain and motivate
highly capable and productive employees, are in the Company's best interests. To
that end, the Company's executive compensation program is designed to reinforce
business strategies, reflect marketplace practices and dynamics, and provide
cost and tax effective forms of remuneration. The Committee reviews the program
regularly to consider and implement any changes necessary to achieve these
ongoing objectives.
The Company's pay-for-performance philosophy is implemented through
compensation policies and plans intended to enhance financial performance in a
highly competitive marketplace, which includes competition from privately-held
firms offering attractive equity ownership opportunities. In terms of
compensation data, the Committee periodically reviews the levels of executive
compensation from a number of general survey sources, with a focus on available
pay data relating to professional talent in the Company's businesses. In
addition, the Committee periodically evaluates chief executive officer
compensation by comparing it to data derived from a selected group of 25-30
major corporations in diversified financial, banking, insurance and industrial
business sectors. This selective grouping is broader than the peer grouping in
the Comparison of Cumulative Total Shareholder Return in order to obtain a more
meaningful representation of competitive compensation practices and levels for
senior executive positions.
The Chief Executive Officer of the Company heads a group of senior
management officers, most of whom are executives of the Company's operating
subsidiaries. These senior officers participate in a common set of compensation
plans and are paid in accordance with award guidelines and performance criteria
that reflect overall Company and individual operating unit performance. The
plans, which include short-term and long-term elements, are intended to be
retrospective, reflecting prior individual and organizational performance, as
well as prospective, providing motivation and rewards for achieving future
success. Such compensation is designed to vary directly with the combined annual
and long-term performance of the employee, the operating subsidiary and the
Company. Moreover, individual contributions by these executives are assessed in
the context of a top management team that views itself as a professional
partnership.
Short-Term Compensation (Salary and Annual Incentive Awards)
With regard to short-term compensation, salaries are reviewed annually and
increases granted by the Committee on a discretionary basis in consideration of
current individual and organizational performance, length of service,
affordability and marketplace practices. Organizational performance refers to
the business unit's success in achieving business objectives and addressing
conditions affecting long-term growth and profits. For participants in the
senior management compensation program, salaries are compared to the top
quartile of the relevant marketplace, with aggregate annual cash compensation
adjusted
19
<PAGE>
to reflect Company performance. Salaries comprised 36% of their total
compensation (excluding stock options) in 1995.
The size of the incentive award pool for senior management cash bonuses is
based on profit and reflects the Company's net operating income growth. However,
the Committee may, in its sole discretion, authorize a payout of less than the
full bonus pool as it did for 1995. In this regard, a specific target level is
not established for the award pool, nor, absent contractual obligations, are
minimum award levels guaranteed for bonus recipients. With respect to individual
award determinations, such assessments by the Committee are largely judgmental,
not formulaic, and reflect the executive's role within the organization,
relative contribution (compared to the internal peer group) to the firm's
earnings growth, and marketplace compensation levels. For 1995, bonus awards at
Putnam Investments, Inc. reflected continued exceptional financial performance,
while awards to executives in the Company's other business sectors were, on
average, five percentage points above 1994. In the senior management group,
individual bonuses comprised 35% of total compensation (excluding stock options)
for 1995.
Long-Term Compensation (Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit and Stock Option
Awards)
It is the Committee's strong belief that the continuing success of the
Company is dependent on the effective retention and motivation of its
executives. Accordingly, long-term compensation is designed to recognize the
individual's past and potential contributions to the organization, and to link
the executive's financial interests with those of the Company's stockholders by
fostering Company stock ownership. Such equity opportunities for Company
executives are made available through stockholder-approved plans that provide
for restricted stock, restricted stock unit and stock option grants. Moreover,
in order to help promote retention of key talent through stock ownership that is
at risk, ownership rights to restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock
options are acquired over time. In addition, under a voluntary deferral program,
a supplemental equity award with vesting requirements may be granted as an
incentive for long-term stock ownership.
Within this framework, the size of each executive's equity grants is
determined at the sole discretion of the Committee. Such determinations include
consideration of the Company's future profit performance expectations and the
individual's organizational role, current performance and potential to
contribute to the long-term success of the Company, as well as a review of
competitive practices on which award guidelines are based. These considerations,
and not prior stock-based awards or Company stock ownership targets, determine
the size of stock grants to individuals.
Most members of the senior management group are eligible to receive annual
discretionary restricted stock grants on the basis described above. In 1995,
such awards for this group accounted for 26% of total compensation (excluding
stock options).
20
<PAGE>
The most senior members of the executive group are also eligible for an
annual discretionary grant of restricted stock units, which are deferred
stock-based awards. The awards reflect the Company's earnings and growth, with
individual grants based on the subjective factors outlined above including each
executive's organizational level and performance. Historically, the grant value
of individual awards has ranged from approximately 50% to 100% of the
executive's cash bonus. Units earned are distributable in shares and generally
vest after completion of three years of service from the date of grant. The
restricted stock units granted in 1995 made up 3% of total compensation
(excluding stock options) for the year.
Stock options are another element of senior management compensation.
Options were generally granted on a three-year cycle until 1995 when annual
grants were instituted. Award size guidelines were adjusted proportionately to
reflect more frequent grants. Such grants are made without reference to present
holdings of unexercised options or appreciation thereon. The size of an
individual grant reflects the factors discussed above including organizational
level, performance and marketplace practices.
Tax Considerations
As noted above, the Company's executive compensation program is designed to
be cost and tax effective. The Committee's policy is to take actions which it
deems to be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders,
recognizing, however, that payment of compensation may not in all instances
qualify for tax deductibility because of the restrictions set forth in Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
BASIS FOR CEO COMPENSATION
Both the quantitative and qualitative criteria referenced above are applied
in assessing the performance and determining the compensation of the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, A.J.C. Smith. The current and
long-term financial performance of the Company--information which is available
to all Company stockholders--are major factors in arriving at the judgmental
compensation determinations made by the Committee relative to Mr. Smith.
Consideration is also given to his leadership and the impact of his
decision-making on the long-term health and performance of the Company. Critical
aspects considered in this performance evaluation include: (1) mastery of the
market and economic dynamics of each operating subsidiary, thus enabling the
Chief Executive Officer to evaluate effectively and approve business strategies
intended to exploit business opportunities; (2) the selection, assignment and
motivation of executives at the Company and operating subsidiary levels; and (3)
providing perspective and counsel to business heads to foster initiatives that
enhance the position of the Company and the value of its services on a global
basis.
21
<PAGE>
On January 1, 1995, Mr. Smith's annual base salary was increased by
$75,000, or 7.1%, from its previous level of $1,050,000, as part of the
Company's annual merit increases. With regard to cash bonus, Mr. Smith
participates in the same Company annual incentive plan as other senior
management officers. His 1995 award under the plan was $775,000, the same amount
he received for the prior year. Based on the previously referenced review of
chief executive officer compensation for 1994 (latest data available), Mr.
Smith's 1995 cash compensation was positioned at about the 45th percentile of
the 1994 survey market.
In connection with long-term compensation, Mr. Smith was granted 6,200
shares of restricted stock in 1995 under terms previously described and valued
at 45% of his base salary at grant. This is the same percentage level he was
awarded in 1994. In addition, Mr. Smith was granted 9,870 restricted stock units
with a value approximating his 1994 cash bonus award. He also was granted 600
restricted stock units for deferring receipt of vested shares of restricted
stock. The combined value of his restricted stock and restricted stock units
grants was $1,339,208. Based on chief executive officer compensation data, Mr.
Smith's 1995 long-term compensation (including any long-term incentive plan
payouts but excluding stock options) was at about the 65th percentile of the
1994 survey market. Mr. Smith was granted 50,000 stock options during 1995, and
the size of this grant was at about the 45th percentile of the 1994 survey
market.
Total compensation for Mr. Smith, which includes all elements of pay from
the Summary Compensation Table except stock option grants, was $3,621,556 in
1995. Based on the data from the comparison group, such compensation for Mr.
Smith was at about the 60th percentile of the 1994 survey market.
Lewis W. Bernard Richard E. Heckert R. J. Ventres
22
<PAGE>
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN
The following graph compares the Company's cumulative total stockholder
return on its common stock (assuming reinvestment of dividends) with the
cumulative total return on the published Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and
the cumulative total return on a Company-constructed composite industry index,
consisting of Alexander & Alexander Services Inc., Aon Corporation, Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co., Sedgwick Group PLC and Willis Corroon Group PLC, over the
five-year period from December 31, 1990 through December 31, 1995.
CHART
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
The Company $100 $108 $125 $115 $116 $134
S&P 500 $100 $130 $140 $155 $157 $215
Composite Industry Index $100 $ 99 $108 $120 $112 $168
Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1990 with dividends reinvested.
23
<PAGE>
TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS; OTHER INFORMATION
During 1995, subsidiaries of the Company employed in the ordinary course of
business individuals related to executive officers and directors of the Company.
In addition, corporations and other entities with which directors are or were
associated had insurance or other transactions with the Company and certain of
its subsidiaries and affiliates in the ordinary course of business, all of which
transactions were on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the
time for comparable transactions with others. None of such insurance or other
transactions involved during 1995, or is expected to involve in 1996, payments
to the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates for property or services in
excess of 5% of the Company's consolidated gross revenue during 1995.
Mr. Husson, who is retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting, has had a
consulting agreement with Marsh & McLennan, Incorporated, a subsidiary of the
Company, for compensation in addition to that as Chairman of Faugere & Jutheau
S.A., a subsidiary of the Company, of at least $100,000 per year. The consulting
agreement has been amended to reflect Mr. Husson's impending retirement as
Chairman of Faugere & Jutheau. Under the amended consulting agreement, which is
to expire in February 2003, Mr. Husson is to be compensated at the rate of
$100,000 per year through 1997, in addition to compensation at the rate of
$40,000 per year as a member of a Conseil de Surveillance of Faugere & Jutheau,
and at the rate of approximately $70,000 per year after 1997. The Company also
has an equity interest in, and correspondent relationship with, certain
insurance broking firms in Africa in which the Husson family has an equity
interest, and Faugere & Jutheau maintains an exclusive correspondent
relationship with an insurance broker in Monaco controlled by the Husson family.
PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STOCK INVESTMENT PLAN
The Board of Directors of the Company has placed on the agenda for the
Annual Meeting a proposal to amend the Marsh & McLennan Companies Stock
Investment Plan (the 'Plan'). The Plan is an employee stock ownership plan and
is intended to qualify under the relevant sections of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the 'Code'). The Plan (including a predecessor plan) has
been in effect continuously since 1966.
All U.S. salaried employees of the Company who are eighteen years or older
are eligible to participate in the Plan after one year of service (currently,
approximately 10,000 employees) by electing to contribute up to 15% (increased
from 12%, effective January 1, 1997) of their base salary to the Plan on either
a pre-tax (pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Code) or after-tax basis, subject
to limits imposed by law. The Company currently contributes to the Plan amounts
equal to 66-2/3% of the employee's contribution, up to a maximum of 66-2/3% of
6% of the employee's salary. All contributions to the Plan are generally
invested in shares of the Company's common stock, except that employees who are
either over age 55 or whose age plus years of Plan service equals or exceeds 65
may elect to direct their account balances to other investment options.
Dividends payable with respect to Company shares in the Plan are either credited
to
24
<PAGE>
participants' accounts or, at their individual election, paid out to such
participants. Under the Code, the Company is allowed a tax deduction with
respect to those dividends that are paid out.
On March 21, 1996, the Company's Board of Directors adopted an amendment to
the Plan, subject to stockholder approval. The amendment provides for an
increase in the Company's matching contribution from 66-2/3% to 71-2/3%
beginning in 1997 for those participants who elect, pursuant to Section 3.1.4 of
the Plan, both to have all or a portion of the dividends on their Plan shares
paid out to them and to make an additional pre-tax contribution to their Plan
account in an amount equal to the amount of the dividends.
The purpose of this amendment is to encourage participants to elect the
dividend pay-out option. Because of the tax deductibility of the dividend
payments made to Plan participants, this new provision, if adopted, is expected
to have a positive effect on the Company's after-tax earnings starting in 1997.
It is not possible to determine how many eligible employees will make the
elections necessary to receive the additional Company matching contribution if
it becomes available. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the dollar
value of the additional allocation that would be made to an employee under the
Plan. However, the maximum additional allocation to any participant is limited
by the Code. Based on limitations in effect for 1996, the maximum additional
allocation per employee under the amended Plan (if the benefit were available in
1996) would be $450.
The Plan currently provides in pertinent part that the Board of Directors
may, at any time, amend the Plan, provided that no amendment shall be adopted
without the approval of the Company's stockholders where such amendment, as now
proposed, would increase the percentage of the Company's matching contributions.
The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote FOR the
proposal to increase the Company's matching contribution to the Plan under the
circumstances described above, effective January 1, 1997. The affirmative vote
of the holders of at least the majority of outstanding shares of the Company's
common stock present or represented at the Annual Meeting is required for the
approval of the amendment to the Plan. The amendment is set forth in the
following proposed resolution.
RESOLVED, that the following amendment to the Plan, as adopted by the
Board of Directors on March 21, 1996, is hereby approved:
The first sentence of Section 3.8.1 (relating to the amount of
Participating Company Matching Contributions) is amended by inserting the
following parenthetical clause after the words 'in an amount equal to two
thirds':
'(seventy one and two thirds percent with respect to each
Participant who has an election in effect pursuant to Section
3.1.4)'
25
<PAGE>
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, has
selected the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent public accountants, to
audit the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 1996. Deloitte & Touche LLP acted as the Company's independent
public accountants for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995. Representatives
of Deloitte & Touche LLP will attend the Annual Meeting, will have an
opportunity to make a statement if desiring to do so and will be available to
answer any pertinent questions.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The Board of Directors of the Company hereby solicits proxies for use at
the 1996 Annual Meeting and at any adjournment thereof. Stockholders who execute
a proxy may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. A proxy may be
revoked at any time before it is voted by giving to the Secretary of the
Company, at the Company's principal executive offices indicated above, written
notice bearing a later date than the proxy, by submission of a later dated proxy
or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Executors, administrators,
trustees, guardians, attorneys and other representatives should indicate the
capacity in which they are signing and corporations should sign by an authorized
officer whose title should be indicated. Mere attendance at the Annual Meeting
will not revoke a proxy which was previously submitted to the Company.
The cost of this proxy solicitation is borne directly by the Company.
Georgeson & Company Inc. has been retained to assist in the proxy solicitation
at a fee of approximately $10,000, plus expenses. In addition to solicitation of
proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone and by
facsimile by the Company's directors, officers and other employees. Such persons
will receive no additional compensation for such services. The Company will also
request brokers and other nominees to forward soliciting material to the
beneficial owners of shares which are held of record by them, and will pay the
necessary expenses.
STOCKHOLDER AND OTHER PROPOSALS
Stockholders who wish to present a proposal at the 1997 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of the Company must submit such proposal in writing to the Company
in care of the Secretary of the Company on or before November 29, 1996 to be
considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for that meeting. In addition,
the by-laws of the Company contain requirements relating to the timing and
content of the notice which stockholders must provide to the Secretary for any
nomination or matter to be properly presented at a stockholders meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Gregory Van Gundy
Gregory Van Gundy
Secretary
26
<PAGE>
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1166 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036-2774
<PAGE>
PROXY PROXY
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE 1996 ANNUAL MEETING
The undersigned hereby appoints A.J.C. Smith and Gregory Van Gundy proxies
(each with power to act alone and with the power of substitution) of the
undersigned to vote as directed on the reverse side all shares which the
undersigned would be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. to be held on Tuesday, May 21, 1996 at 10:00
a.m. (New York City time) in the Auditorium, 2nd Floor, 1221 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, New York and at any adjournment thereof.
IMPORTANT--This proxy must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
<PAGE>
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
PLEASE MARK VOTE IN OVAL IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER USING DARK INK ONLY. /x/
[INDICIA]
1996 For All
For Withheld Except
1. Election of Directors:
Robert Clements, Robert F. Erburu, / / / / / /
Jeffrey W. Greenberg, Richard S. Hickok,
P David D. Holbrook, Adele Smith Simmons, ____________________________
R A.J.C. Smith Nominee Exception(s)
O
X 2. Approval of Amendment to Stock For Against Abstain
Y Investment Plan / / / / / /
3. Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as For Against Abstain
auditors for 1996 / / / / / /
Sign here as name(s) appear on card
Dated _________________________, 1996
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
The signer hereby revokes all proxies heretofore given by the signer to vote at
said meeting or any adjournments thereof. If signing for a corporation or
partnership or as agent, attorney or fiduciary, indicate capacity in which you
are signing.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN.
IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THEY WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS 1,2 AND 3.
PLEASE RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE
<PAGE>
CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES STOCK INVESTMENT PLAN
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, MAY 21, 1996
By signing and returning this card, the undersigned directs Bankers Trust
Company, Trustee under the Marsh & McLennan Companies Stock Investment Plan, to
vote in person or by proxy all shares of stock of Marsh & McLennan Companies,
Inc. (the 'Company') allocated to the undersigned under said Plan upon all
matters at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company on May 21, 1996 and
at any adjournment thereof.
Provided this card is received by May 16, 1996, voting rights will be
exercised by the Trustee as directed or, if not specifically directed, FOR the
items stated herein. Under the Plan, the Trustee shall vote all other shares in
the same proportion as those shares for which it has received a signed
instruction card.
<PAGE>
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
PLEASE MARK VOTE IN OVAL IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER USING DARK INK ONLY. /x/
[INDICIA]
1996 For All
For Withheld Except
1. Election of Directors:
Robert Clements, Robert F. Erburu, / / / / / /
Jeffrey W. Greenberg, Richard S. Hickok,
P David D. Holbrook, Adele Smith Simmons, ____________________________
R A.J.C. Smith Nominee Exception(s)
O
X 2. Approval of Amendment to Stock For Against Abstain
Y Investment Plan / / / / / /
3. Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as For Against Abstain
auditors for 1996 / / / / / /
Sign here as name(s) appear on card
Dated _________________________, 1996
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
The signer hereby revokes all proxies heretofore given by the signer to vote at
said meeting or any adjournments thereof. If signing for a corporation or
partnership or as agent, attorney or fiduciary, indicate capacity in which you
are signing.
THE ALLOCATED SHARES WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE
UNDERSIGNED. IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THEY WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS 1,2 AND 3.
PLEASE RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE
