<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant /X/
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
/ / Preliminary Proxy Statement
/ / Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
/X/ Definitive Proxy Statement
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Pursuant to 240.14a-11(c) or 240.14a-12
THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY
----------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ No fee required.
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previous Paid:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
[MAY LOGO]
The May Department Stores Company
611 Olive Street
St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1799
April 17, 1997
Dear Fellow Shareowner:
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of shareowners
to be held at the Cervantes Convention Center, Washington at 8th Street, St.
Louis, Missouri, on Friday, May 23, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight
Time.
We are pleased to have achieved our 22nd consecutive year of record
sales and earnings per share from continuing operations. During 1996 we
continued to focus our efforts on delivering more value to our customers by
executing with more speed and agility, enhancing our leadership position with
super brands, strengthening our position in higher quality prestige
merchandise, developing important niche businesses, simplifying the shopping
experience for our customers and becoming a more powerful holiday and gift
store. We continue to target significant growth from new stores,
acquisitions, and expansions. We remain dedicated to developing the best
talent in retailing and treating the customer right.
We appreciate your continued support for our efforts. We are committed
to continuing to grow and enhance the value of your investment.
It is important that your shares be represented at this meeting. Even
if you plan to attend, we encourage you to promptly sign, date and return
your proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
Very truly yours,
/s/ David C. Farrell /s/ Jerome T. Loeb
David C. Farrell Jerome T. Loeb
Chairman of the Board and President
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE> 3
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREOWNERS
The annual meeting of shareowners of The May Department Stores Company, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held at the Cervantes
Convention Center, Washington at Eighth Street, St. Louis, Missouri, on
Friday, May 23, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, to consider and
act upon the following matters:
(a) The election of four directors;
(b) The ratification of the appointment of independent auditors; and
(c) Proposals by certain shareowners.
The foregoing matters are more fully described in the following proxy
statement. All common shareowners and owners of ESOP preference shares of
record at the close of business on April 1, 1997 (the "Record Date") are
entitled to vote at the meeting.
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished to shareowners of common stock of the
Company and to owners of ESOP (Employee Stock Ownership Plan) preference
shares of the Company ("ESOP stock") in connection with the solicitation by
the board of directors of proxies for use at the annual meeting of
shareowners and at all adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy
statement and the enclosed form of proxy are being mailed to shareowners on
or about April 17, 1997.
Owners of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share
owned. The outstanding voting securities of the Company as of the Record
Date, which carry 250,606,163 votes, consisted of (i) 235,236,024 shares of
common stock (excluding 78,400,972 shares of treasury stock), and (ii)
682,359 shares of ESOP stock which carry 15,370,139 votes. The owners of the
outstanding common stock and of the ESOP stock are entitled to vote together
as a single class.
Shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted by the persons
named as proxies in accordance with the specifications marked on the proxy.
If no such specifications are made, the shares will be voted in accordance
with the recommendations of the board of directors. The board of directors
recommends that shareowners vote for Proposals (a) and (b) and against the
shareowner proposals. See "General - Other Matters" below for information
concerning the voting of proxies if other matters are properly brought before
the annual meeting.
The Company knows of no person who is the beneficial owner of more than
5% of the Company's voting securities, except that:
(i) the Oppenheimer Group, Oppenheimer Tower, World Financial Center,
New York, New York, has filed a Form 13G indicating that, as of January 17,
1997, it owned 15,010,014 shares of common stock (5.96% of the shares of
common stock outstanding on that date); and
(ii) as of the Record Date, the Company's Profit Sharing Plan
beneficially owned 11,519,951 shares of common stock (4.9% of the outstanding
shares of common stock) and 100% of the outstanding shares of ESOP stock
which carry 15,370,139 votes. Members direct the voting of all shares held by
the Profit Sharing Plan. Together, the ESOP stock and the common stock owned
by the Profit Sharing Plan represent 10.7% of the votes which can be cast at
the meeting.
THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Proposal (a) on the accompanying proxy card.
Nominees. The board of directors proposes the election of four directors.
These four directors, together with the ten directors whose terms continue
beyond this year's annual meeting, will comprise the board of directors.
The shares represented by the accompanying proxy card will be voted
(unless voting authority is withheld) in favor of electing the persons named
below as directors. Such proxies will be voted to elect Jerome T. Loeb,
Russell E. Palmer, Michael R. Quinlan and William P. Stiritz to serve as
directors for terms expiring at the 2000 annual meeting of shareowners and
until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. Mrs.
Kaplan and Messrs. Kahn, Meyer, Pearson and Weidenbaum were previously
elected to serve as directors for terms expiring at the 1998 annual meeting
of shareowners, and Messrs. Battram, Farrell, Storey, Torcasio and Whitacre
were previously elected to serve as directors for terms expiring at the 1999
annual meeting of shareowners, and, accordingly, these directors do not stand
for election at the 1997 annual meeting.
If any nominee should subsequently become unavailable for election, the
holders of proxies may, in their discretion, vote for a substitute or the
board of directors may reduce the number of directors to be elected. The ages
shown on the following pages are as of May 23, 1997, and the shares shown are
the shares of common stock of the Company over which the director had sole or
shared voting and investment power as of March 24, 1997 and phantom stock
units held in deferred compensation accounts as of such date. No director
reported beneficial ownership of any shares of preferred stock of the Company
other than ESOP stock owned by the Profit Sharing Plan. The shares of common
stock reported reflect interests in shares owned by the Company's Profit
Sharing Plan.
The executive officers and directors, as a group (23 individuals), (i)
had, as of March 24, 1997, sole voting and investment power over 1,981,242
shares of common stock (less than 1% of common shares outstanding) and
disclaim beneficial ownership as to 4,384 of such shares and (ii) have the
right to acquire sole or shared voting and investment power over 712,742
shares on or before May 23, 1997, and disclaim beneficial ownership as to all
of such shares and (iii) had, as of March 24, 1997, 130,868 phantom stock
units held in deferred compensation accounts. The figures in this paragraph
include the shares reported on the following pages with respect to each of
the nominees.
1
<PAGE> 4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David C. Farrell, Director since 1974, age 63
Mr. Farrell, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of
the Company, joined the Company in 1956. He became chief executive
officer in 1979 and chairman of the board in 1985. He is also a
[PHOTO] director of Emerson Electric Co. and Ralston Purina Company. Mr.
Farrell beneficially owns 885,298 shares of common stock and
28,696 deferred phantom stock units and has the right to acquire
an additional 244,475 shares of common stock on or before May 23,
1997.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard L. Battram, Director since 1984, age 62
Mr. Battram, executive vice chairman of the Company, joined the
Company in 1972. He became vice chairman of the Company in 1984
[PHOTO] and executive vice chairman in 1996. Mr. Battram beneficially
owns 180,448 shares of common stock and has the right to acquire
an additional 102,207 shares of common stock on or before May 23,
1997.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eugene S. Kahn, Director since 1996, age 47
Mr. Kahn, vice chairman of the Company, joined the Company in
1990. He served as president of G. Fox from 1990 to 1992 and as
president and chief executive officer of Filene's from 1992 to
[PHOTO] March 1996 when he became vice chairman. Mr. Kahn beneficially
owns 128,719 shares of common stock and 29,791 deferred phantom
stock units and has the right to acquire an additional 58,867
shares of common stock on or before May 23, 1997.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helene L. Kaplan, Director since 1985, age 63
Mrs. Kaplan is of counsel to the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP. She was a partner in the law firm of Webster &
Sheffield from 1978 to 1985 and served as counsel to Webster &
Sheffield from 1986 to 1990. She is a director of Chase Manhattan
[PHOTO] Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Mobil
Corporation and NYNEX Corporation. Mrs. Kaplan also serves as a
trustee or director of many non-profit cultural, educational and
scientific organizations. Mrs. Kaplan beneficially owns 8,910
shares of common stock and 2,823 deferred phantom stock units.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerome T. Loeb, Director since 1984, age 56 (Standing for election
at this meeting)
Mr. Loeb, president of the Company, joined the Company in 1964. He
served as vice chairman from 1986 to 1993, when he became
president. Mr. Loeb also served as chief financial officer from
[PHOTO] 1981 to May, 1996. Mr. Loeb beneficially owns 329,996 shares of
common stock (and disclaims beneficial interest in 4,384 of those
shares) and has the right to acquire an additional 66,181 shares
on or before May 23, 1997.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward H. Meyer, Director since 1979, age 70
Mr. Meyer is chairman of the board of directors, president and
chief executive officer of Grey Advertising Inc. Mr. Meyer joined
Grey Advertising Inc. in 1956 and became president in 1968, chief
executive officer in 1970 and chairman of the board in 1972. Mr.
[PHOTO] Meyer is also a director of Bowne & Co., Inc., Ethan Allen
Interiors, Inc. and Harman International Industries, Incorporated,
and he is a director/trustee of 31 mutual funds advised by Merrill
Lynch Asset Management, Inc. Mr. Meyer beneficially owns 15,150
shares of common stock and 5,225 deferred phantom stock units.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell E. Palmer, Director since 1984, age 62 (Standing for
election at this meeting)
Mr. Palmer is the chairman and chief executive officer of The
Palmer Group, a corporate investment firm. He is the retired
managing director and chief executive officer of Touche Ross
International and the retired Dean of The Wharton School and
[PHOTO] Reliance Professor of Management and Private Enterprise at the
University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Palmer is also a director of
Allied-Signal Inc., Bankers Trust New York Corporation, Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, GTE Corporation and Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. Mr. Palmer beneficially owns 5,510 shares of
common stock and 1,370 deferred phantom stock units.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
<PAGE> 5
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrall E. Pearson, Director since 1982, age 71
Mr. Pearson is a general partner in Clayton, Dubilier and Rice, a
private investment firm, and has served as the chairman of the
board of Kraft Foodservice, Inc. since February 13, 1995. He is
the retired president and chief operating officer of PepsiCo, Inc.
[photo] He also served as the Class of 1958 Professor of Business
Administration, Harvard University Graduate School of Business
Administration. Mr. Pearson is also a director of Alliant
Foodservice, Kinko's and Travelers Group. Mr. Pearson
beneficially owns 5,510 shares of common stock and 7,453 deferred
phantom stock units.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael R. Quinlan, Director since 1993, age 52 (Standing for
election at this meeting)
Mr. Quinlan is chairman and chief executive officer of McDonald's
Corporation. He joined McDonald's in 1963 and served as chief
operating officer from 1982 to 1987 and as president from 1982 to
1989. He became chief executive officer in 1987 and chairman in
[PHOTO] 1990. Mr. Quinlan is also a director of Dun & Bradstreet
Corporation and Catalyst, a non-profit organization, and a member
of the board of trustees of Ronald McDonald Children's Charities
and Loyola University of Chicago. Mr. Quinlan beneficially owns
3,810 shares of common stock and 505 deferred phantom stock units.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William P. Stiritz, Director since 1983, age 62 (Standing for
election at this meeting)
Mr. Stiritz is chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer of Ralston Purina Company. Mr. Stiritz is also
a director of Angelica Corporation, Ball Corporation, General
[PHOTO] American Life Insurance Company, Interstate Bakeries Corporation,
Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. and Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. Mr.
Stiritz beneficially owns 5,510 shares of common stock and 13,743
deferred phantom stock units.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert D. Storey, Director since 1989, age 61
Mr. Storey is a partner in the law firm of Thompson, Hine & Flory
LLP, in Cleveland, Ohio. Prior to joining his present law firm in
1993, Mr. Storey was a partner for 19 years in the law firm of
Burke, Haber & Berick, also in Cleveland. Mr. Storey is also a
[PHOTO] director of Bank One, Cleveland, GTE Corporation and The Procter &
Gamble Company, and a trustee of the Kresge Foundation, the George
Gund Foundation, Case Western Reserve University, and Spelman
College. Mr. Storey beneficially owns 5,771 shares of common
stock and 1,760 deferred phantom stock units.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony J. Torcasio, Director since 1996, age 51
Mr. Torcasio, president and chief executive officer of May
Merchandising Company, joined the Company in 1967. He served as
president and chief executive officer of L. S. Ayres from 1988 to
1991 and as president and chief executive officer of Famous-Barr
[PHOTO] from 1991 to 1993, when he assumed his current position. Mr.
Torcasio beneficially owns 83,478 shares of common stock and has
the right to acquire an additional 84,805 shares of common stock
on or before May 23, 1997.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Murray L. Weidenbaum, Director 1978-1981 and since 1982, age 70
Dr. Weidenbaum is chairman of the Center for the Study of American
Business and is the Mallinckrodt Distinguished University
Professor at Washington University. He joined the faculty of
Washington University in 1964, and from time to time served in
[PHOTO] certain governmental positions, including chairman of the Council
of Economic Advisers in 1981 and 1982. Dr. Weidenbaum is also a
director of Harbour Group, Ltd., Macroeconomics Advisors L.L.C.,
and Tesoro Petroleum. Dr. Weidenbaum beneficially owns 5,510
shares of common stock.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward E. Whitacre, Jr., Director since 1989, age 55
Mr. Whitacre is chairman of the board and chief executive officer
of SBC Communications, Inc. and has served in this capacity since
[PHOTO] January 1990. He is a director of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.,
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and Emerson Electric Co.
Mr. Whitacre beneficially owns 5,510 shares of common stock.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
<PAGE> 6
Executive Compensation. The Summary Compensation Table on the next page shows
the compensation in each of the last three fiscal years of the executive
officers whose compensation is required to be disclosed pursuant to current
proxy rules.
Performance Based Bonus Plans. The Company has three performance based bonus
plans that cover approximately 3,000 associates. Each plan links a major
portion of the associates' potential total pay to the associates' performance
and to the Company's performance.
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Corporate Executives. The
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Corporate Executives applies to
nine individuals, including the five individuals named in the Summary
Compensation Table. Participants may receive annual cash awards (for
individual fiscal years) and long-term cash awards (for three-year long-term
performance periods). These awards are based upon attaining earnings per
share and return on net assets (RONA) performance standards relating to the
Company as a whole and are also based on the performance of the Company's
stock price over the long-term performance periods. In addition, awards
are subject to an automatic upward or downward adjustment to reflect the
Company's performance as compared to the performance of a group of
competitors identified at the beginning of each measurement period. The plan
is administered by the executive compensation and development committee of
the board of directors (the "Committee"), which is comprised solely of
non-management directors. The performance standards are set by the Committee
at the beginning of the measurement periods and are measured by the Committee
after the close of the measurement periods. The maximum annual award payable
under the plan's formula is 45% (90% for the chief executive officer) of the
executive's base salary, and the maximum long-term award payable under the
plan's formula is 45% (90% for the chief executive officer) of the executive's
average base salary over the three-year period. The awards for the named
executive officers can be adjusted downward on a discretionary basis by the
Committee. (See the Long-Term Incentive Plan table on this page.)
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Company Principals. The
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Company Principals applies to the
17 presidents, chairmen and vice chairmen of the Company's operating
divisions. Participants may receive annual cash awards (for individual fiscal
years) and long-term cash awards (for three-year long-term performance
periods). These awards are based upon attaining earnings growth and RONA
performance standards relating to the participants' respective divisions and
are also based on the performance of the Company's stock price over the
long-term performance periods. The plan is administered by the Committee,
which may (and has) delegated certain decisions regarding the implementation
of the plan to a management committee comprised of the chief executive
officer, the president and certain other management executives, none of whom
can be participants in the plan (the "Management Committee"). The performance
standards are set by the Management Committee at the beginning of the
measurement periods and are measured by the Management Committee after the
close of the measurement periods. The maximum annual award payable under the
plan's formula is 45% of the participants' base salary, and the maximum
long-term award payable under the plan's formula is 45% of the participants'
average base salary over the three-year period. The Management Committee may
adjust any of the awards upward or downward, in its sole and absolute
discretion. Awards are reviewed annually by the Committee.
Performance Incentive Plan. The Performance Incentive Plan applies to
approximately 2,970 associates of the Company and its subsidiaries. Participants
may receive annual cash awards based upon attaining certain measures of
performance tailored to the participant's job. Performance standards are set at
the beginning of the fiscal year and measured after the close of the fiscal
year. The maximum annual award payable under the plan's formula ranges from 10%
to 50% of the associate's base salary.
Approximately $35.7 million was awarded to all participants in the three
plans for the performance periods ending in the last fiscal year. Amounts
awarded under these plans are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
During the last fiscal year, each of the five executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table became eligible to receive a potential long-term
cash award for the three fiscal years 1996 to 1998. The table below shows the
maximum long-term cash awards payable to each of them for that long-term period.
<TABLE>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<CAPTION>
Performance
or Other Estimated Maximum
Period Until Future Payouts
Maturation Under Non-Stock
Name or Payout Price Based Plan <F1>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
David C. Farrell Earned over $1,106,250
Jerome T. Loeb three fiscal $437,325
Richard L. Battram years (1996-1998) $378,825
Eugene S. Kahn ending 1/30/99 $318,888
Anthony J. Torcasio $300,225
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
<F1> Payouts may range from $0 to the "maximum" award value. The estimate
above assumes that the individual remains eligible to participate
throughout the three-year period, the maximum performance goals
have been met and that the stock price has increased sufficiently
to result in the maximum stock price adjustment.
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE> 7
<TABLE>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<CAPTION>
Annual
Compensation<F2> Long-Term Compensation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Awards Payouts
------------------------------------------
Restricted Long-Term All Other
Name and Stock Stock Incentive Compen-
Principal Position Year Salary<F1><F3> Bonus<F1><F4> Awards<F5> Options<F6> Payouts<F1><F7> sation<F8>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
David C. Farrell 1996 $1,200,000 $818,100 $3,022,500 220,995 $684,640 $7,710
Chairman of the Board and 1995 $1,175,000 $720,000 $0 35,000 $675,300 $5,576
Chief Executive Officer 1994 $1,100,000 $532,820 $0 35,000 $827,584 $5,329
Jerome T. Loeb 1996 $925,000 $323,832 $2,378,125 60,773 $254,277 $7,710
President 1995 $843,750 $255,000 $0 23,500 $239,700 $5,576
1994 $812,500 $199,807 $2,062,500 73,500 $277,351 $5,329
Richard L. Battram 1996 $806,250 $281,222 $0 52,486 $223,000 $7,710
Executive Vice Chairman 1995 $743,750 $225,000 $0 17,500 $213,100 $5,576
1994 $713,750 $175,588 $343,125 17,500 $254,076 $5,329
Eugene S. Kahn <F9> 1996 $666,667 $230,090 $0 24,862 $174,279 $7,710
Vice Chairman
Anthony J. Torcasio 1996 $637,500 $221,569 $0 52,486 $176,085 $7,710
President and Chief Executive 1995 $600,000 $180,000 $1,299,375 17,500 $165,100 $5,576
Officer 1994 $550,000 $145,314 $0 17,500 $181,818 $5,329
May Merchandising Company
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
<F1> Total Cash Compensation. As supplemental information, the following
table shows the total cash compensation (Salary, Bonus and Long-Term
Incentive Payouts) paid to the named executive officers for the fiscal
year.
<CAPTION>
Year Mr. Farrell Mr. Loeb Mr. Battram Mr. Kahn Mr. Torcasio
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996 $2,702,740 $1,503,109 $1,310,472 $1,071,036 $1,035,154
1995 $2,570,300 $1,338,450 $1,181,850 $945,100
1994 $2,460,404 $1,289,658 $1,143,414 $877,132
<F2> The Summary Compensation Table does not reflect certain non-cash
compensation made available to the named executive officers for the
last three fiscal years because the aggregate amounts of such
compensation are below the required disclosure thresholds.
<F3> The table reflects salary paid or deferred during the respective fiscal
years shown. Annual salary changes for each of the named executives
and for all salaried associates normally occur on May 1 of each year.
<F4> "Bonus" reflects the annual portion of the bonus payable under the
Company's Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Corporate
Executives. See "Performance Based Bonus Plans" on page 4. The
bonuses were paid or were deferred under the Company's Deferred
Compensation Plan, which provides that all deferrals will be
distributed to participants in lump sum cash payments immediately
following a change in control of the Company (as defined in the plan).
<F5> Restricted Stock is valued at the average price of the common stock on
the date of grant. The aggregate value of the restricted stock owned by
each of the named executive officers as of the end of the last fiscal
year (at $45.125 per share) was $3,587,799 for Mr. Farrell (79,508
shares), $5,866,250 for Mr. Loeb (130,000 shares), $4,061,250 for Mr.
Kahn (90,000 shares), and $2,166,000 for Mr. Torcasio (48,000 shares).
Dividends are paid on these shares quarterly. 30,000 shares of Mr.
Farrell's 1996 grant of 60,000 shares vest on April 30, 1997 and the
remaining 30,000 shares vest on April 30, 1998. Shares of restricted
stock are included in the common stock ownership numbers on pages 1
through 3. Under some circumstances, restricted shares continue to be
forfeitable for up to 10 years from the date of grant. The restricted
stock plan and the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan provide that, upon a change
in control of the Company (as defined in the plans), restricted stock
grants will be fully vested and all restrictions will be waived.
<F6> "Stock Options" represent non-qualified 10-year options under the
Company's 1976 and 1987 stock option plans and the 1994 Stock
Incentive Plan. Generally, one-fourth of the options become
exercisable on each of the first through fourth anniversaries of
the grant date. The plans provide that all outstanding options
become fully exercisable upon the occurrence of a change in control
of the Company (as defined in the plans). 1996 option numbers are
adjusted to reflect the May 4, 1996 spin-off of Payless ShoeSource,
Inc. by the Company.
<F7> "Long-Term Incentive Payouts" represents the long-term portion of the
bonus payable under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for
Corporate Executives. Such amounts were paid or were deferred under
the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan. See "Performance Based
Bonus Plans" on page 4 and note 4 above.
<F8> "All Other Compensation" represents the Company's effective matching
allocation to the named individuals' accounts in the Company's
Profit Sharing Plan. See "Profit Sharing Plan" on page 6.
<F9> Mr. Kahn became an executive officer for reporting purposes for the
first time in 1996 and, therefore, no information is provided for
earlier years.
</TABLE>
5
<PAGE> 8
Profit Sharing Plan. During 1996, over 48,700 associates invested $65.8
million in the Profit Sharing Plan, $40.7 million of which was invested in
the Company's common stock. In addition, $43.3 million of the Company's
common stock and ESOP stock was added to associates' accounts as a result of
the matching formula. As of the Record Date, the plan beneficially owned 4.9%
(11,519,951 shares) of the outstanding common stock and 100% (equivalent to
15,370,139 shares of common stock) of the outstanding ESOP stock, which
together represent 10.7% of the voting power of the Company.
The plan links its benefits to the Company's performance each year and
to the value of the Company's common stock. Generally, the Company matches up
to the first 5% of pay each pay period that an associate invests in the plan.
In 1996, our associates made $42.1 million of "matchable" contributions to
the plan. The matching rate for any year is variable and discretionary. The
matching rate is based on the Company's earnings per share (EPS) performance.
If the EPS increases by 6% from one year to the next, the matching rate is
50% (i.e., 50 cents for every matchable dollar invested). The matching rate
increases by 1.25 percentage points over 50% for every one percentage point
by which the EPS increase exceeds 6%; the matching rate also decreases based
on the same formula if the EPS change is less than a 6% increase. In
addition, if the price of the Company's common stock exceeds $22.5083 per
share, the effective matching rate will be higher as a result of the
operation of the ESOP feature of the plan (added in April 1989). The
effective matching rate for 1996 was 103%, the highest match in the 27-year
history of the Profit Sharing Plan and the first time over 100%. The
effective matching rate has averaged 85% over the last five years.
Associates with one year of service (with at least 1,000 hours of paid
employment) and who are at least 21 years old may participate. The plan
offers associates four professionally managed investment funds for associate
contributions: a money market fund, a fixed income index fund, a common stock
index fund and a Company common stock fund.
Retirement Plans. The Company has a noncontributory retirement plan covering
substantially all associates who are paid for 1,000 or more hours per year.
In addition, the Company has a supplementary retirement plan (the
"Supplementary Plan") covering, generally, associates who, at one time, had
compensation in a calendar year equal to at least twice the amount of "wages"
then subject to the payment of old age, survivor and disability insurance
Social Security taxes. Under the Supplementary Plan, covered associates
become entitled to a single life annuity retirement benefit equal to (i) 2%
of the average of the highest three out of the last five fiscal years of
final annual salary and bonuses (reported as salary, bonus and long-term
incentive payouts in the Summary Compensation Table) multiplied by their
years of service, up to a maximum of 25 years (ii) reduced by primary Social
Security benefits, Company-provided benefits provided under the Company's
retirement, profit sharing and disability plans and, if appropriate, by
amounts to reflect early retirement. The minimum benefit under the
Supplementary Plan is the amount of Company-provided benefits which would
have been payable under the Company's retirement and profit sharing plans,
determined without regard to any statutory limits, less the amount of
Company-provided benefits actually payable under those plans.
The Supplementary Plan provides that, in the event of a change in
control (as defined in the plan), vesting would be accelerated in limited
circumstances and benefits would not be forfeitable. The Company established
a trust which would be funded upon a potential change in control to provide
accrued benefits under the Supplementary Plan and which would, upon an actual
change in control, become irrevocable.
The following table shows the estimated aggregate annual benefits
payable upon retirement (assuming a retirement in 1996) for persons in
specified compensation and years of service classifications covered by the
Company's retirement plan and, if eligible, the Supplementary Plan. (The
individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table had, as of
December 31, 1996, the following years of service, respectively: David C.
Farrell, 41 years; Jerome T. Loeb, 33 years; Richard L. Battram, 24 years;
Eugene S. Kahn, 6 years; and Anthony J. Torcasio, 25 years.)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Years of Service
Annual --------------------------------------------------------
Earnings 10 25 30 35 40
- ------------------------ -------- -------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 800,000 $117,590 $217,651 $255,815 $ 293,978 $ 332,142
1,000,000 153,735 276,059 323,970 371,881 419,792
1,300,000 207,953 363,671 426,203 488,735 551,267
1,600,000 262,170 451,282 528,435 605,588 682,741
1,900,000 316,387 538,894 630,667 722,441 814,215
2,200,000 370,605 626,504 732,900 839,295 945,690
2,500,000 424,823 714,115 835,132 956,148 1,077,164
2,800,000 479,040 801,726 937,365 1,073,002 1,208,639
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
With respect to the last fiscal year, the expense to the Company of the
Company's retirement plans for associates aggregated $30.8 million.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements. The Company has entered into severance agreements with the
five executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. The
agreements provide that the executive is entitled to benefits if (i) a change
in control of the Company (as defined in the agreement) occurs and (ii)
during the 180 days following such change in control, the executive
determines in good faith that as a result of the change in control he is
unable to execute his duties effectively. Following such 180-day period,
employment must be actually or constructively terminated other than for cause
or disability during the term of the agreement for benefits to be payable.
6
<PAGE> 9
Under the severance agreements, a change in control would include any of the
following events: (i) any "person," as defined in the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, acquires 50% or more of the Company's voting securities;
(ii) a majority of the Company's directors are replaced during a two-year
period; or (iii) shareowners approve certain mergers, or a liquidation, or
sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets.
The severance agreements provide a lump sum payment equal to three
times the sum of (i) base salary at termination or, if greater, base salary
immediately prior to the change in control plus (ii) target bonus with
maximum share price adjustment for the year in which the change in control
occurs. Each agreement also provides 36 months of continued medical and life
insurance benefits and, if the terminated executive is within five years of
his or her eligibility date, eligibility in the Company's post-retirement
life and medical insurance benefits. The agreements with officers who are
subject to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provide for a
cash payment in cancellation of stock options. The agreement with the
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer provides a "tax gross-up"
payment to ensure that the above-mentioned payments are not subject to net
reduction due to imposition of excise taxes which are payable under Section
4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. The agreement with the President provides
for 50% of such payment. The Company established a trust which would be
funded upon a potential change in control to provide the benefits under the
severance agreements and which would, upon an actual change in control,
become irrevocable.
All of the named executive officers have individual written contracts
of employment with the Company which expire at various dates on or before
April 30, 2001 and which provide for annual base salaries at rates not less
than the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
<TABLE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STOCK OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL 1996
<CAPTION>
Percent of
Options Total Options Exercise or Expiration Grant Date
Name Granted<F1> Granted Base Price<F2> Date Present Value<F3>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
David C. Farrell 165,746 6.4% $45.5894 3/15/2003 $2,401,660
55,249 2.1% $45.2500 5/08/2006 $ 923,763
Jerome T. Loeb 27,624 1.1% $43.0441 4/10/2006 $ 433,144
33,149 1.3% $45.2500 5/08/2006 $ 554,251
Richard L. Battram 27,624 1.1% $45.5894 3/15/2006 $ 461,597
24,862 1.0% $45.2500 5/08/2006 $ 415,693
Eugene S. Kahn 24,862 1.0% $45.2500 5/08/2006 $ 415,693
Anthony J. Torcasio 52,486 2.0% $45.2500 5/08/2006 $ 877,566
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
<F1> Generally, one-fourth of the options become exercisable on May 8, 1997,
the first anniversary of the date of the grant, and on each of the
second through fourth anniversaries thereafter. One-fourth of the
options of Mr. Farrell's 165,746 share option grant become
exercisable on December 31, in each of 1996 through 1999.
One-fourth of the options of Mr. Loeb's 27,624 share option grant
become exercisable on April 10, in each of 1997 through 2000. All
of Mr. Battram's 27,624 share option grant becomes exercisable on
April 15, 1997.
<F2> The exercise price is the market price on the date the options were
granted.
<F3> The Grant Date Present Values were determined using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The estimated values under the model are
based on assumptions as to variables such as option term, interest
rates, stock price volatility and dividend yield. The actual
value, if any, the option holder may realize will depend on the
excess of the actual market price of the stock over the exercise
price on the date the option is exercised. The Grant Date Present
Value calculation is presented in accordance with SEC proxy
disclosure requirements, and the Company has no way to determine
whether the Black-Scholes model can properly determine the value
of an option. There is no assurance that the value that may be
realized by the option holder will be at or near the value
estimated by the Black-Scholes model. The model assumes: (a) an
option term of 10 years, which represents the length of time
between the grant date of options under the Company's plans and
the latest possible exercise date by the named executive officers;
(b) an interest rate that represents the interest rate on a U.S.
Treasury Bond with a maturity date corresponding to that of the
option's term; (c) stock price volatility calculated based on
daily stock price changes during the year prior to the grant date;
and (d) dividends at the rate of $1.16 per share, the annual
dividend rate with respect to a share of stock on the grant date.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGGREGATED STOCK OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL 1996
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
<CAPTION>
Total Number of Value of Unexercised
Shares Total Unexercised Options Held In-the-Money Options<F2>
Acquired Gain -------------------------------- -----------------------------
Name on Exercise Realized<F1> Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
David C. Farrell 66,229 $1,841,375 103,590 294,201 $682,768 $2,118,265
Jerome T. Loeb 40,939 $ 771,320 31,584 155,853 $340,883 $1,020,992
Richard L. Battram 22,099 $ 453,116 53,175 82,183 $791,727 $ 329,773
Eugene S. Kahn 79,420 $1,334,867 48,342 101,520 $692,677 $ 518,426
Anthony J. Torcasio 0 $ 0 56,491 82,183 $840,208 $ 329,773
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
<F1> The amounts "realized" reflect the appreciation on the date of exercise
(based on the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the
date of exercise over the exercise price). However, because the
executive officers may keep the shares they acquired upon the
exercise of the option (or sell them at different prices), these
amounts do not reflect cash realized upon the sale of those shares.
<F2> "In the-Money Options" are options outstanding at the end of the last
fiscal year for which the fair market value of the Company's
common stock at the end of the last fiscal year ($45.125 per
share) exceeded the exercise price of the options.
</TABLE>
7
<PAGE> 10
Stock Price Performance. The graph below compares the Company's cumulative
total shareowner return on an investment of $100 at the close of the market
on February 1, 1992 (the end of fiscal 1991) in Company common stock against
the returns of the S&P 500 stock index, an index of the competitors used in
determining bonuses for fiscal 1995 under the Company's performance based
bonus plans (the "1995 Competitor Group") and the S&P Retail Department
Stores Index.
Comparison of 5-Year Cumulative Return
May, S&P 500 Index, 1995 Competitor Group Index
and S&P Retail Department Stores Index
[GRAPH]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
May $100.0 $131.7 $151.3 $138.0 $179.7 $202.1
S&P 500 $100.0 $110.6 $124.8 $125.5 $174.0 $219.8
1995 Competitor Group $100.0 $119.6 $122.6 $111.0 $123.4 $148.0
S&P-Dept. Stores $100.0 $111.6 $128.0 $113.5 $135.5 $145.6
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The 1995 Competitor Group is comprised of Dayton Hudson, Dillard's, J.C.
Penney, Melville, Mercantile and Nordstrom. During 1995, Melville announced
plans to significantly restructure its business. The Company dropped it from
the group of competitors used in determining bonuses for fiscal 1996. In
addition, on May 4, 1996, the Company completed the spin-off of its
self-service family shoe store business, Payless ShoeSource, Inc. With the
disposition of Payless, the Company's continuing operations comprise one
industry segment, department stores. Given these changes, management
believes that a comparison to the S&P Retail Department Stores Index is now
appropriate for the stock price performance graph. The companies included in
the S&P Retail Department Stores Index are Dillard's, Federated, J.C. Penney,
May, Mercantile and Nordstrom.
Executive Stock Ownership. The Company encourages all of its associates to
make a personal investment in Company stock, further aligning their interests
with those of shareowners. In 1994, the Company adopted the following minimum
stock ownership guidelines for the Company's top management group:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ownership
Guideline
(Multiple of
Executive Level Base Salary)
- ------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Chief Executive Officer 5.0 times
Corporate Senior Management
Committee<Fa> 3.5 times
Presidents, Chairmen and Vice Chairmen
of Operating Divisions 2.5 times
Corporate Executive Vice Presidents and
Senior Vice Presidents and the
Senior Management Committees of
Operating Divisions 1.5 times
- ------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
<Fa> Currently includes Mr. Farrell (whose guideline is the CEO guideline
above) and the other named executive officers.
</TABLE>
These minimum guidelines are expected to be satisfied within five years of
when they first apply to an executive in a position, and may be satisfied
through direct ownership of shares, share equivalents under the Company's
Profit Sharing Plan or phantom stock under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
Executive Compensation and Development Committee Report. The executive
compensation and development committee (the "Committee") reviews and
approves, among other things, the compensation payable to each of the
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. Each member of
the Committee is an independent, non-management director.
Compensation Philosophy. The Company's basic compensation philosophy is
that the compensation program should:
* attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executives;
* be competitive;
* align the executive's compensation with the Company's objectives; and
* be meaningfully related to the value created for shareowners.
Compensation for senior executives is comprised of a base salary, bonus
opportunities (a significant portion of total compensation) and long-term
stock related incentives. The Committee reviews compensation based on the
foregoing philosophy, on the performance of the Company and on competitive
practices. As part of its review of competitive pay levels, the Committee
looks at the base salary levels, annual bonus levels and long-term related
incentives at a broad group of companies, including other retail companies
and companies in other industries of similar size and complexity to the
Company. The Committee did not target a specific percentage level of
compensation within the group, but, as discussed under the "Additional
Information" heading below, determined, based on that review, that the
Company's current overall compensation program is consistent with and
furthers the compensation philosophy described above.
8
<PAGE> 11
Base Salary. Base salaries are reviewed by the Committee on an annual
basis and may be increased at that time based on (i) the individual's
contribution to the Company, including changes in responsibilities, (ii)
competitive pay levels and (iii) management's recommendations. As a result
of this overall review, including a review of changes in responsibilities of
the named executive officers, the annual rate of the base salaries for the
named executive officers increased in May 1996 by an average of 5.5%.
Bonus Opportunities. The Company has three performance based bonus
plans that cover approximately 3,000 associates. Each plan links a major
portion of the associates' potential total pay to the associates' performance
and to the Company's performance. The three plans are described on page 4.
The bonus opportunities for the most senior executives and executive officers
include both annual and long-term opportunities. Each named executive
participates in the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Corporate
Executives, which provides an opportunity for both an annual bonus and a
long-term bonus.
For 1996, the annual bonus opportunity was for up to 45% (90% for Mr.
Farrell) of base salary, and was determined based on whether the Company
achieved certain performance levels (threshold, target or maximum) determined
in advance by the Committee for (i) earnings per share ("EPS") and (ii)
return on net assets ("RONA") over the year. The annual bonus is subject to
an automatic upward or downward adjustment based on the Company's performance
relative to the EPS and RONA performances of a predetermined group of
competitors consisting of Dayton Hudson, Dillard's, J.C. Penney, Mercantile,
Nordstrom and Sears (the "Competitor Group"). While return on equity is the
Company's principal measure in evaluating its performance for shareowners and
its ability to profitably invest shareowners' funds, the bonus plans use RONA
in evaluating this element of bonus opportunity in order to facilitate
industry comparisons without having to make adjustments for different levels
of leverage among the Competitor Group. The Company's rank relative to the
Competitor Group is determined based on data provided to the Committee by the
Company's independent public accountants. The annual bonus also can be
adjusted downward on a discretionary basis by the Committee. For 1996, the
Company exceeded the target performance level set by the Committee for EPS
and achieved the target performance level for RONA (no adjustment was made
based on the Company's relative rank in the Competitor Group). Based on
these results, the annual bonus represented 68.2% of base salary for Mr.
Farrell and 34.1% of base salary for each of the other named executive
officers.
For the three-fiscal-year period ended in 1996, the long-term bonus
opportunity was for up to 45% (90% for Mr. Farrell) of average base salary,
and was determined based on whether the Company achieved certain performance
levels (threshold, target or maximum) determined in advance by the Committee
for (i) compound growth rate for EPS and (ii) average RONA over the
three-fiscal-year period. The long-term bonus is subject to an automatic
upward or downward adjustment (i) based on predetermined levels of changes in
the common stock price over the period and (ii) based on the Company's
performance as compared to the EPS and RONA performances of the Competitor
Group. The Company's rank relative to the Competitor Group is determined
based on data provided to the Committee by the Company's independent public
accountants. The long-term bonus also can be adjusted downward on a
discretionary basis by the Committee. For the three-year period which ended
with fiscal 1996, the Company's performance exceeded the target performance
level set by the Committee for compound growth for EPS and exceeded the
target performance level set for average RONA (no adjustment was made based
on the Company's relative rank in the Competitor Group), and the common stock
price increased by 26.2%, resulting in a 26.2% increase in the long term
bonuses. Based on these results, the long-term bonuses awarded for the
three-year period which ended with fiscal 1996 represented approximately
59.1% of average base salary for Mr. Farrell and approximately 29.6% of
average base salary for each of the other named executive officers.
Long-Term Stock Related Incentives. The Company provides long-term
stock related incentives with stock options and restricted stock, which are
designed to attract, retain and motivate management associates and relate
their compensation directly to the performance of the Company's stock. Stock
options are granted at fair market value on the date of the grant and will
only have value to the executives if the Company's stock price increases. The
Committee establishes guidelines for the grant of options for all executives
and specifically approves any grants to executive officers. The Committee has
established option guidelines for annual grants based on competitive
practices and position levels. Restricted stock grants are approved by the
Committee in special circumstances.
The 1996 annual option grants to the named executive officers
(including Mr. Farrell) were consistent with the normal annual grant levels
previously established for those officers. In addition, during 1996, the
Committee approved additional stock option grants to Messrs. Farrell, Loeb,
Battram and Torcasio and grants of restricted stock to Messrs. Farrell and
Loeb, all in connection with renewals of employment contracts. Except as
described above, no other grants were made to the named executive officers in
1996.
9
<PAGE> 12
Additional Information. During 1996, the Company selected and retained
independent, professional compensation experts to study the compensation of
the executive group in the Company's operating divisions and of the senior
management committee in the corporate office. The experts reviewed the
Company's base salary levels, annual bonus levels and long-term incentives as
compared with the compensation packages of a broad group of companies,
including the Competitor Group, other retail companies and companies in other
industries of similar size and complexity to the Company. Based on the
experts' review, the Committee has determined that the Company's current
compensation program, taking into account base compensation, bonus
opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities, is consistent with and
furthers the compensation philosophy described above.
During 1996, the Committee continued to review the new tax law and
proposed IRS regulations limiting the tax deductibility of executive
compensation in excess of $1 million. The Committee also reviewed the
exceptions that permit tax deductions on such compensation, including
exceptions for performance based compensation. The Committee's policy
continues to be that the Company should attempt, wherever reasonably
possible, to qualify future compensation to be tax deductible.
Executive Compensation and Development Committee:
Edward H. Meyer, Chairman
Russell E. Palmer
Edward E. Whitacre, Jr.
Miscellaneous. Executive officers and directors are required to report to
the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ownership of and transactions in Company
common stock. Based solely on a review of copies of reports provided to it
by such individuals, the Company believes that all reporting requirements
were satisfied.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The board of directors held 8 meetings during the last fiscal year. Each
incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total
number of board meetings held during the period for which such director held
such office and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all board
committees on which such director served during the periods that such
director served. Overall, the average percentage for all directors'
attendance was 98%.
Compensation of Directors. Directors receive an annual fee of $30,000 and, in
addition, $2,000 for attending each board meeting and $1,000 for attending
each committee meeting. A non-management chairperson of a committee receives
an additional annual fee of $5,000. Non-management directors may defer all
or any portion of their cash fees under a deferred compensation plan that is
substantially similar to the Deferred Compensation Plan for management
associates.
Each new director, upon joining the board, receives 2,000 shares of
common stock which are subject to restrictions on transferability and to
forfeiture for five years. In addition, each director receives the
equivalent of $40,000 in the form of either restricted stock, which is not
transferable, or phantom stock units which are credited under the deferred
compensation plan. Management board members receive no compensation or fees
for attending board or committee meetings.
The board of directors has an audit committee, an executive committee,
an executive compensation and development committee, a finance committee and
a nominating committee, each of which is described below.
Audit Committee. The audit committee is comprised of Mrs. Kaplan and Messrs.
Meyer, Palmer (chairman), Quinlan, Stiritz, Storey and Weidenbaum. The
committee met four times during the last fiscal year. The audit committee
makes recommendations to the board of directors as to the selection of and
proposed arrangements with the firm of independent public accountants and
auditors that examines the books and accounts of the Company for each fiscal
year, reviews the results of audits, reviews the coordination between the
independent public accountants and auditors and the Company's internal
auditing staff, and oversees the Company's policies concerning sensitive
payments and conflict of interest.
Executive Committee. The executive committee is comprised of Messrs. Farrell
(chairman), Loeb, Meyer, Palmer, Pearson and Stiritz. The committee acted by
unanimous written consent one time during the last fiscal year. The
executive committee exercises, on a "standby" or "emergency" basis, and
subject to the direction of the full board of directors, all of the powers of
the board of directors (with certain specified exceptions required by law)
during intervals between meetings.
Executive Compensation and Development Committee. The executive compensation
and development committee is comprised of Messrs. Meyer (chairman), Palmer
and Whitacre. The committee met four times during the last fiscal year. In
addition, frequent telephone conversations occurred among the committee
members. The committee considers and recommends to the board the Company's
overall compensation programs, reviews and approves the compensation payable
to all senior management personnel, reviews the compensation payable to store
company principals, reviews and approves new compensation programs that
involve Company stock or affect
10
<PAGE> 13
compensation to senior management personnel and store company principals,
advises management on all other executive compensation matters as requested,
and reviews and monitors management development efforts to assure development
of a group of executives that would provide for adequate and orderly
management succession. The committee also administers (directly, or in some
circumstances by delegation or the establishment of operating guidelines) the
1994 Stock Incentive Plan, the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for
Corporate Executives, the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Company
Principals and the Deferred Compensation Plan.
Finance Committee. The finance committee is comprised of Mrs. Kaplan and
Messrs. Loeb, Pearson (chairman), Quinlan, Stiritz, Weidenbaum and Whitacre.
The committee met three times during the last fiscal year. In addition,
frequent telephone conversations occurred among the committee members. The
finance committee reviews the financial policies, plans and structure of the
Company and reviews and recommends to the board the Company's long-range
financial plans, the Company's capital expenditure program, specific debt and
equity placement activities, financial public relations and communications
programs, financial aspects of proposed acquisitions or divestitures, and the
administration and evaluation of the retirement and profit sharing plans'
investments.
Nominating Committee. The nominating committee is comprised of Mrs. Kaplan
and Messrs. Stiritz (chairman), Storey and Whitacre. The committee met two
times during the last fiscal year. In addition, frequent telephone
conversations occurred among the committee members. The nominating committee
recommends to the board nominees for directors, nominees for the successor to
the chief executive officer when a vacancy in that office occurs, and
nominees for chairpersons and members of all committees of the board. The
committee also advises the board with respect to criteria relating to
director tenure and compensation of non-management directors. The committee
considers suggestions as to nominees for directors from any source, including
any shareowner. Nominations by shareowners should be submitted in writing to
the Company's Secretary, 611 Olive Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1799
and, to be effective, must comply with the advance notice procedures set
forth in the Company's by-laws. A copy of the notice procedures is available
upon request to the Company's Secretary.
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Proposal (b) on the accompanying proxy card.
Upon recommendation of the audit committee, the board of directors appointed
Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as auditors of the
Company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending January 31, 1998
subject to ratification by the shareowners at the annual meeting. It is
intended that, unless otherwise directed by shareowners, proxies will be
voted for the ratification of this appointment. A member of the firm of
Arthur Andersen LLP will be present at the meeting to make such statements as
that firm may desire and to answer any questions by shareowners. The
aggregate amount of fees paid in fiscal 1996 by the Company to Arthur
Andersen LLP was $3.2 million. The board of directors unanimously recommends
a vote FOR Proposal (b), and your proxy will be so voted unless you specify
otherwise.
PROPOSAL BY A SHAREOWNER CONCERNING
A CLASSIFIED BOARD
Proposal (c) on the accompanying proxy card.
Evelyn Y. Davis, Watergate Office Building, Suite 215, 2600 Virginia Ave.,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, who is the owner of 50 shares of common stock
of the Company, has advised the Company that she plans to introduce the
following resolution at the annual meeting:
Resolved, that the shareholders of The May Department Stores Company
recommend that the Board of Directors take the necessary steps to reinstate the
election of directors annually, instead of the stagger system which was recently
adopted.
This shareowner has submitted the following statement in support of this
resolution:
Until recently, directors of May were elected annually by all
shareholders.
The great majority of New York Stock Exchange listed corporations
elect all their directors each year.
This ensures that all directors will be more accountable to all
shareholders each year and to a certain extent prevents the self-
perpetuation of the Board.
Last year, the owners of 95,387,369 shares, representing
approximately 45.0% of shares voting, voted FOR this proposal.
If you agree, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution.
The board of directors opposes the foregoing resolution. The staggered
election of directors is intended to prevent precipitous changes in the
composition of the board by preventing the election of an entirely new board
in a single year. By providing that directors will serve three-year terms
rather than one-year terms, it facilitates continuity and stability of
leadership and policy by assuring that several experienced directors familiar
with the Company and its business will be on the board at all times.
Preventing such a precipitous change serves to moderate changes in corporate
policies, business strategies and operations which are not in the best
interests of the Company and its shareowners.
11
<PAGE> 14
The annual election of directors would enable a group of individuals or
entities owning a significant but minority position in the Company to obtain
actual control of the Company or further some other personal goal with
respect to the Company or its shares or assets by electing at a single annual
meeting its own slate of directors. Such an attempt, even if unsuccessful,
can seriously disrupt the business of the Company and cause it to incur
substantial expense. Board classification encourages any person or group
seeking to acquire control of the Company to initiate such action through
arm's-length negotiations with management and the board of directors, who are
in the best position to negotiate a transaction which is fair to all Company
shareowners. In the event the board is radically changed, it may be unable
or unwilling to protect the interest of all shareowners from the abusive
tactics of a corporate raider who seeks to obtain effective control of any
public corporation for its own purposes rather than to create long-term value
for the shareowners.
The Company has had a classified system of electing directors in place
for 70 of its 87 years of existence. For all of the reasons described above,
the board of directors continues to believe that the classified system is
advantageous to the Company and its shareowners. The board of directors
unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal (c), and your proxy will be so
voted unless you specify otherwise.
PROPOSAL BY A SHAREOWNER CONCERNING VENDOR STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
Proposal (d) on the accompanying proxy card.
The Southern Regional Joint Board of the Union of Needletrades, Industrial
and Textile Employees ("UNITE"), owner of 37 shares of common stock of the
Company, has advised the Company that it plans to introduce the following
resolution at the annual meeting:
That the shareholders of The May Department Stores Company ("Company")
request that the Board of Directors review compliance with its
"Vendor Standards of Conduct," and prepare a report at reasonable
expense, which would be available to shareholders by November
1997. The report should describe the Company's current and future
compliance efforts and plans. We further request that our Company
add the following compliance-related measures to its vendor
policies:
1. Establish independent monitoring mechanisms in conjunction with
non-governmental organizations, including allowing direct access to employees
who make Company products;
2. Strengthen internal monitoring procedures;
3. Translate "Vendor Standards of Conduct" into the language of
employees of Company suppliers and require suppliers to distribute these
documents to employees.
This shareowner has submitted the following statement in support of this
resolution:
Our Company purchases merchandise from contractors in the United States
and around the world. It has tremendous power over the terms of
these relationships. We believe our Company should take active
steps to ensure that its suppliers meet certain minimum standards
for the treatment and working conditions of their employees, in
order to protect these workers from unethical and illegal business
practices and violations of their human rights.
A national consumer survey by Marymount University released in November
1996 reported that nearly four out of five shoppers would avoid a
retailer selling garments made in sweatshops. U.S. Labor
Secretary Robert Reich commented that the survey showed "in the
long run, sweatshops hurt a company's bottom line." In addition
our Company's supplier standards are supposed to prevent illegal
forms of worker abuse.
However, our Company has been implicated repeatedly in worker abuse and
sweatshop scandals. In February 1996 clothes sold at May stores
were identified by Thai garment workers as having been produced at
an El Monte, California sweatshop where these workers were held
captive under the threat of rape or murder and paid as little as
fifty cents per hour. An expose released by the Union of
Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE) in December
1996 reports abusive conditions at several manufacturers producing
private label products for the May Company.
The UNITE report found that at contractors for May in New York, workers
"face physical abuse, sexual harassment, sub-minimum wages, child
labor, and overtime without pay." At May's overseas contractors
in Indonesia and Honduras, conditions cited include the employment
of child labor, daily strip searches of workers, life-threatening
conditions, and sexual harassment. UNITE also reported that the
Company's manufacturer of its "Pant-her" line of clothing, Norton
McNaughton, contracts with sweatshops in Brooklyn which operate
illegal networks of industrial homeworkers.
These persistent reports implicating our Company make clear that it
should review and strengthen its current system of supplier
oversight. We believe that this is necessary to protect the
Company from legal and other implications of supplier conduct.
Our Company's image and the actions behind that image are of great
concern to customers and should be to shareholders as well.
Adherence to high corporate standards, particularly in the area of
supplier conduct, makes both moral and economic sense.
12
<PAGE> 15
The board of directors opposes the foregoing resolution. The Company
recognizes the importance, as both an ethical and a business responsibility,
of obtaining appropriate assurances that the merchandise sold in its stores
is manufactured in accordance with all applicable laws, including those
relating to the rights and welfare of the workers producing the merchandise.
As the proposal correctly acknowledges, the Company has adopted a Vendor
Responsibility Program, formalizing its policies and practices designed to
protect the interests of workers engaged in the manufacture of merchandise
for the Company.
Although well-intentioned, the board of directors believes that the
proposal is unnecessary in that the Company's management has for years
utilized careful and effective procedures
for monitoring compliance with its policies and continues to enhance and
strengthen the enforcement of its Vendor Responsibility Program with new
initiatives.
* Since 1994, the Company has notified all overseas suppliers of its
private label merchandise of the Company's policies and standards with
respect to labor laws, child labor and prison labor. All suppliers must
certify in writing their compliance with those policies. The Company
obtains this certification from every new supplier at the time the
business relationship is established and annually thereafter. No orders
are placed with a supplier unless there is a current certification
in the Company's files.
* Every year, the Company notifies each current domestic brand name
and private label supplier of the Company's labor policies and standards
and informs them that a supplier's failure to operate in compliance with
the policies and standards would prevent the Company from continuing to do
business with the supplier.
* Every time the Company places a purchase order, the purchase order,
on its face, requires certification and warranty by the manufacturers that
it, and all third party contractors, comply with all labor laws,
regulations and codes, including laws relating to the employment of
children and prison labor.
* The Company inspects each factory and subcontract or factory of a
supplier of the Company's private label merchandise before an initial
order is placed with the supplier and annually thereafter. The Company's
inspectors look for and note any labor law violations. The Company
notifies a supplier of any violations noted during an inspection and if
the violations are not corrected, the Company ceases to purchase
merchandise from that supplier.
* Over the years, the Company has established long-term relationships
with several private label suppliers, and management believes that the
Company's high standards of business ethics and corporate responsibility
have, and will continue to, influence the standards of those suppliers.
* In 1996, the Company adopted the National Retail Federation
Statement of Principles on Supplier Legal Compliance. It has designated a
contact person to work with the Department of Labor on Fair Labor
Standards Act matters. Management representatives of the Company work
with and through the National Retail Federation to conduct supplier
compliance seminars to educate suppliers and increase their awareness of
the Company's policies.
Consistent with the sound business practices and ethical
responsibilities reflected in the Company's policy described above, the
Company investigated the specific examples of alleged abusive conditions
involving the manufacture of merchandise for May referred to by the proponent
in its supporting statement, which involve eight manufacturers. We believe
that the allegations of the proponent are not accurate. Company personnel or
representatives of one of the "big six" independent public accounting firms
inspected the factories of three of the manufacturers and found no labor law
violations. In addition, the Company does not buy merchandise from three of
the manufacturers, nor does it have any knowledge that it ever received any
goods allegedly produced by the El Monte, California factory referred to by
the proponent. Furthermore, the Company understands that the remaining
manufacturer had stopped using the factory mentioned in the proponent's
report before the alleged events referred to in that report had occurred.
The board of directors believes that the concerns reflected in the
proposal already have been addressed by the Company and will continue to be
the subject of close scrutiny as the Company continues to implement its
Vendor Responsibility Program. The Company's procedures for monitoring
compliance with the program are extensive and effective. Assuring that the
Company's suppliers treat their employees with dignity and respect is not a
new idea at the Company. The Company devotes substantial resources, both in
dollars and in hours, to establish its formal policies and to monitor
compliance with them. The Company believes that further expenditures of time
and money would be redundant and not in the best interests of the Company and
its shareowners. The Company believes that the interests of its shareowners
will be best served if its efforts remain focused on monitoring its existing
policies and practices, to enhance compliance by its suppliers. Accordingly,
the board of directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal (d),
and your proxy will be so voted unless you specify otherwise.
13
<PAGE> 16
GENERAL
1998 Shareowner Proposals. Shareowner proposals for the 1998 annual meeting
of shareowners must be received at the Company's principal executive offices,
611 Olive Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1799, Attention: Secretary, on
or prior to December 25, 1997, for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement
and the form of proxy for such meeting.
Vote Required. The election of directors requires a plurality of votes cast.
The affirmative vote of the owners of a majority of the shares represented in
person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the item is required to approve
the ratification of auditors and the shareowner proposals. The shares
represented by abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and
entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Abstentions and
broker non-votes are not counted as either FOR or AGAINST for purposes of the
election of directors. An abstention is counted as a vote AGAINST, and a
broker non-vote is not counted as either FOR or AGAINST, for purposes of
approving the other matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting.
Other Matters. In addition to Proposal (d) on the accompanying proxy card,
UNITE has informed the Company that it intends to introduce two proposals for
consideration at the Company's 1997 annual meeting of shareowners. One
proposal is an amendment to the Company's by-laws that would require the
Company not to adopt or maintain a shareowner rights plan without shareowner
approval and to redeem its current shareowner rights plan. The other
proposal requests that the board of directors take the steps necessary to
eliminate the classified board of directors. The proxy holders intend to
exercise their discretionary authority to vote against these proposals should
they be properly presented at the annual meeting.
Management knows of no other matters to be presented at the annual
meeting. However, if other matters are presented for a vote at the meeting,
the proxy holders will vote the shares represented by properly executed
proxies according to their judgment on those matters. Any shareowner has the
power to revoke his or her proxy at any time during or prior to the annual
meeting.
Solicitation of Proxies. Your signature on the accompanying proxy card is
solicited by the Company's board of directors. The expenses of solicitation
of proxies hereunder will be paid by the Company. Proxies may be solicited by
directors, officers and regular employees of the Company personally, by mail,
telegraph and telephone from and through registered owners, nominees and
others acting as principals and as intermediaries. The Company may reimburse
persons holding shares in their names or those of their nominees for their
expenses in sending proxies and proxy material to principals. In addition,
the Company has retained D. F. King & Co., Inc., to assist in the
solicitation of proxies for a fee of $18,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please complete, sign
and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope, which requires
no postage if mailed in the United States. Your cooperation in giving this
matter your immediate attention will be appreciated.
By order of the board of directors.
14
<PAGE> 17
Directions to Cervantes Convention Center
Washington at Eighth Street
St. Louis, Missouri
The Cervantes Convention Center
is located on Washington Avenue
at 8th Street, 2 blocks north of
Famous-Barr. Please enter the
convention center through the
Convention Plaza entrance on the
east side of the building. The
meeting will be held in the
Lecture Hall on the first floor.
[MAP]
Parking has been reserved for
you in the parking garage
adjacent to the convention
center. From the garage, you may
enter the convention center two
ways. You may take a garage
elevator to the street level and
walk outside to the Convention
Plaza entrance next to the garage
or, you may take the stairs that
connect the second level of the
parking garage with the second
level of the convention center,
and take the escalator down to
the first floor. The meeting
room is on the first level of the
convention center, immediately
to your left as you enter the
building.
<PAGE> 18
[MAY LOGO]
The May Department Stores Company
611 Olive Street
St. Louis, MO 63101-1799
To Shareowners of The May Department Stores Company:
The annual meeting of May shareowners will be held at the Cervantes
Convention Center, Washington at Eighth Street, St. Louis, Missouri, on
Friday, May 23, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time. The enclosed
proxy statement provides you with information regarding the meeting.
It is important that your shares be represented at this meeting. Even if you
plan to attend, please promptly sign, date and return your proxy in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope.
ADMISSION TICKET
(Please detach the proxy card below and return it in the enclosed envelope.
If you are planning to attend the annual meeting, please save this Admission
Ticket and bring it to the meeting for admission.)
Detach Proxy Card Here
/ /
To vote your shares for all listed nominees, please mark the FOR box in Item
(a). To withhold voting for all nominees, please mark the WITHHOLD box. If
you do not wish your shares voted FOR a particular nominee, please mark the
EXCEPTION box and enter the name of the exception(s) in the space provided.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management recommends a vote FOR Items (a) and (b).
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Election of Directors For Withhold Exception
Exception(s) ------------------- /X/ /X/ /X/
--------------------------------
For Against Abstain
(b) Ratification of the appointment /X/ /X/ /X/
of independent auditors
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management recommends a vote AGAINST Items (c) and (d).
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Against Abstain
(c) Proposal by a shareowner /X/ /X/ /X/
concerning a classified board
(d) Proposal by a shareowner
concerning vendor standards of /X/ /X/ /X/
conduct
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you plan to attend the annual /X/
meeting, please mark here.
Address change and/or comments, /X/
please mark here.
Please sign name(s) exactly as shown on this card.
Date: --------------------------------, 1997
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Signature(s)
Votes MUST be indicated
(x) in Black or Blue ink.
<PAGE> 19
DIRECTIONS TO CERVANTES CONVENTION CENTER
Washington at Eighth Street
St. Louis, Missouri
The Cervantes Convention Center
is located on Washington Avenue
at 8th Street, 2 blocks north of
Famous-Barr. Please enter the
convention center through the
Convention Plaza entrance on the
east side of the building. The
meeting will be held in the
Lecture Hall on the first floor.
[MAP]
Parking has been reserved for
you in the parking garage
adjacent to the convention
center. From the garage, you may
enter the convention center two
ways. You may take a garage
elevator to the street level and
walk outside to the Convention
Plaza entrance next to the garage
or, you may take the stairs that
connect the second level of the
parking garage with the second
level of the convention center,
and take the escalator down to
the first floor. The meeting
room is on the first level of the
convention center, immediately
to your left as you enter the building.
[MAY LOGO] PROXY
THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors for the annual
meeting on May 23, 1997.
By signing this card, the undersigned appoints each of David C. Farrell,
Louis J. Garr, Jr. and Richard A. Brickson, as proxy, with full power of
substitution, to vote all common shares of the undersigned in The May
Department Stores Company at the May 23, 1997 annual meeting of shareowners,
and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, on all subjects that
may properly come before the meeting, subject to the directions on the other
side of this card. This card is also the undersigned's voting instruction
for any and all shares held of record by The Bank of New York for the
undersigned's account in the Company's Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR election of all listed director
nominees, FOR proposal (b) and AGAINST proposals (c) and (d) listed on the
other side of this card. If no directions are given, and this signed card is
returned, the undersigned understands that the proxies will vote in accordance
with recommendations of the board of directors and in each proxy's discretion on
any other matter that may properly come before the meeting and at any
adjournment or postponement thereof. See "General - Other Matters" in the
Company's proxy statement for the 1997 annual meeting.
The nominees for the board of directors are Jerome T. Loeb, Russell E. Palmer,
Michael R. Quinlan and William P. Stiritz.
Please sign the other side of this card and THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY
return this card promptly to the address P.O. BOX 631
shown on the right in the enclosed return WILMINGTON, DE 19899-9905
envelope.
<PAGE> 20
Payless ShoeSource
3231 East Sixth Street
Topeka, Kansas 66607
To Members of the Payless ShoeSource, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan:
You have shares of The May Department Stores Company common stock in the May
Common Stock Fund, one of the investment funds under the Payless Profit
Sharing Plan. You have the opportunity to direct the trustee on how to vote
these shares at May's 1997 Annual Meeting.
Enclosed please find May's 1996 Annual Report to Shareowners, the proxy
statement for May's 1997 Annual Meeting, a confidential voting instruction
card and a return envelope. It is important that you vote. The
recommendations of May's management on each issue and the reasons for the
recommendations are described in the proxy statement.
Please complete, sign and return the confidential voting instruction card.
The Profit Sharing Plan trustee (The Bank of New York) will follow your
voting instructions. These instructions cannot be disclosed by the trustee.
Detach Voting Instruction Card Here
/ /
To vote your shares for all listed nominees, please mark the FOR box in Item
(a). To withhold voting for all nominees, please mark the WITHHOLD box. If
you do not wish your shares voted FOR a particular nominee, please mark the
EXCEPTION box and enter the name of the exception(s) in the space provided.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management recommends a vote FOR Items (a) and (b).
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Election of Directors For Withhold Exception
Exception(s) ------------------- /X/ /X/ /X/
--------------------------------
For Against Abstain
(b) Ratification of the appointment /X/ /X/ /X/
of independent auditors
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management recommends a vote AGAINST Items (c) and (d).
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Against Abstain
(c) Proposal by a shareowner /X/ /X/ /X/
concerning a classified board
(d) Proposal by a shareowner
concerning vendor standards of /X/ /X/ /X/
conduct
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address change and/or comments, /X/
please mark here.
Please sign name(s) exactly as shown on this card.
Date: --------------------------------, 1997
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Signature(s)
Votes MUST be indicated
(x) in Black or Blue ink.
<PAGE> 21
CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE UNDER
THE PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN
By signing this card, I appoint the Trustee to vote all shares of common
stock of The May Department Stores Company credited to my account in the May
Common Stock Fund of the Payless ShoeSource, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan at the
May 23, 1997 annual meeting of shareowners, and at any adjournment or
postponement of the meeting, on all subjects that may properly come before
the meeting, subject to the directions on the other side of this card, on the
basis of my interests in The May Common Stock Fund, as of January 31, 1997
(the latest practicable Valuation Date).
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR election of all listed director
nominees, FOR proposal (b) and AGAINST proposals (c) and (d) listed on the
other side of this card. If no directions are given, and this signed card is
returned, I understand that the Trustee will vote in accordance with
recommendations of the board of directors and in its discretion on any other
matter that may properly come before the meeting and at any adjournment or
postponement thereof. See "General - Other Matters" in the Company's proxy
statement for the 1997 annual meeting. If this card is not received by the
Trustee on or before May 16, 1997, the Trustee will vote my shares in the same
proportion as the other shares held by the Trustee are voted pursuant to
instructions received from other participants in the Payless ShoeSource, Inc.
Profit Sharing Plan.
The nominees for the board of directors are Jerome T. Loeb, Russell E.
Palmer, Michael R. Quinlan and William P. Stiritz.
Please sign the other side of this card and THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY
return this card promptly to the address P.O. BOX 631
shown on the right in the enclosed return WILMINGTON, DE 19899-9905
envelope.
<PAGE> 22
[MAY LOGO]
The May Department Stores Company
611 Olive Street
St. Louis, MO 63101-1799
Dear Fellow Member of the Profit Sharing Plan:
Enclosed is the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Shareowners, which summarizes
May's performance for the year. Also enclosed are the proxy statement for
the 1997 Annual Meeting, a confidential voting instruction card and a return
envelope. It is important that you vote. Management's recommendations on
each issue and the reasons for the recommendations are described in the proxy
statement.
In 1996, we achieved our 22nd consecutive year of record sales and earnings
per share from continuing operations. During 1996, we continued to focus our
efforts on delivering more value to our customers by executing with more
speed and agility, enhancing our leadership position with super brands,
strengthening our position in higher quality prestige merchandise, developing
important niche businesses, simplifying the shopping experience for our
customers and becoming a more powerful holiday and gift store. In this
year's annual report we salute you and your commitment to treating the
customer right, featuring (on pages 10 and 11) associates who represent the
thousands of May associates whose high level of performance has enabled us to
achieve another year of progress toward our mission of Excellence in
Retailing.
Please complete, sign and return the confidential voting instruction card.
The Profit Sharing Plan trustee (The Bank of New York) will follow your
voting instructions. These instructions cannot be disclosed by the trustee.
Again we thank you for your accomplishments.
Very Truly Yours,
/s/ David C. Farrell /s/ Jerome T. Loeb
David C. Farrell Jerome T. Loeb
Chairman of the Board and President
Chief Executive Officer
Detach Voting Instruction Card Here
/ /
To vote your shares for all listed nominees, please mark the FOR box in Item
(a). To withhold voting for all nominees, please mark the WITHHOLD box. If
you do not wish your shares voted FOR a particular nominee, please mark the
EXCEPTION box and enter the name of the exception(s) in the space provided.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management recommends a vote FOR Items (a) and (b).
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Election of Directors For Withhold Exception
Exception(s) ------------------- /X/ /X/ /X/
--------------------------------
For Against Abstain
(b) Ratification of the appointment /X/ /X/ /X/
of independent auditors
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management recommends a vote AGAINST Items (c) and (d).
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Against Abstain
(c) Proposal by a shareowner /X/ /X/ /X/
concerning a classified board
(d) Proposal by a shareowner
concerning vendor standards of /X/ /X/ /X/
conduct
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address change and/or comments, /X/
please mark here.
Please sign name(s) exactly as shown on this card.
Date: --------------------------------, 1997
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Signature(s)
Votes MUST be indicated
(x) in Black or Blue ink.
<PAGE> 23
[MAY LOGO] CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONS TO
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE UNDER
THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY PROFIT SHARING PLAN
By signing this card, I appoint the Trustee to vote all shares of common
stock of The May Department Stores Company represented by units credited to
my account in the May Common Stock Fund of the Profit Sharing Plan and all
shares of ESOP Preference Shares of the Company credited to my account in the
ESOP Preference Fund of the Profit Sharing Plan, all as of January 31, 1997
(the latest practicable Valuation Date), at the May 23, 1997 annual meeting
of shareowners, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, on all
subjects that may properly come before the meeting, subject to the directions
on the other side of this card.
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR election of all listed director
nominees, FOR proposal (b) and AGAINST proposals (c) and (d) listed on the
other side of this card. If no directions are given, and this signed card is
returned, I understand that the Trustee will vote in accordance with
recommendations of the board of directors and in its discretion on any other
matter that may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof. See "General - Other Matters" in the Company's proxy
statement for the 1997 annual meeting. If this card is not received by the
Trustee on or before May 16, 1997, the Trustee will vote my shares in the same
proportion as the other shares held by the Trustee are voted pursuant to
instructions received from other participants in the Profit Sharing Plan.
The nominees for the board of directors are Jerome T. Loeb, Russell E. Palmer,
Michael R. Quinlan and William P. Stiritz.
Please sign the other side of this card and THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY
return this card promptly to the address P.O. BOX 631
shown on the right in the enclosed return WILMINGTON, DE 19899-9905
envelope.
<PAGE> 24
APPENDIX
Page 8 of the printed Proxy contains a Comparison of 5-Year Cumulative
Return graph. The information contained in the graph is stated in a tabular
format immediately following the graph.
