UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
---------------
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
Commission File Number 1-3924
MAXXAM INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE 95-2078752
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or Identification Number)
organization)
5847 SAN FELIPE, SUITE 2600 77057
HOUSTON, TEXAS (Zip Code)
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 975-7600
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes /X/ No / /
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at April 17, 1997: 8,617,747
MAXXAM INC.
INDEX
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION PAGE
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997 and
December 31, 1996 3
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three
months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996 4
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three
months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996 5
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 12
PART II. - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 23
Item 5. Other Information 23
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 23
Signatures S-1
MAXXAM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, December 31,
1997 1996
------------- -------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
<S> <S> <S>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 193.7 $ 336.6
Marketable securities 52.4 50.3
Receivables:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $5.2 243.2 200.7
Other 72.7 85.9
Inventories 640.9 634.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 174.7 169.1
------------- -------------
Total current assets 1,377.6 1,477.4
Property, plant and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $794.0 and
$769.5, respectively 1,298.5 1,297.9
Timber and timberlands, net of accumulated
depletion of $156.9 and $154.6,
respectively 300.1 301.8
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated
affiliates 174.0 179.5
Deferred income taxes 423.3 419.7
Long-term receivables and other assets 455.9 439.4
------------- -------------
$ 4,029.4 $ 4,115.7
============= =============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 161.7 $ 201.5
Accrued interest 35.1 61.5
Accrued compensation and related benefits 152.6 158.7
Other accrued liabilities 156.6 154.1
Payable to affiliates 92.3 98.1
Long-term debt, current maturities 25.6 69.6
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities 623.9 743.5
Long-term debt, less current maturities 1,918.4 1,881.9
Accrued postretirement medical benefits 729.0 731.9
Other noncurrent liabilities 588.6 589.4
------------- -------------
Total liabilities 3,859.9 3,946.7
------------- -------------
Commitments and contingencies
Minority interests 220.4 219.8
Stockholders' deficit:
Preferred stock, $.50 par value;
12,500,000 shares authorized; Class A
$.05 Non-Cumulative Participating
Convertible Preferred Stock; shares
issued: 669,701 .3 .3
Common stock, $.50 par value; 28,000,000
shares authorized; shares issued:
10,063,885 5.0 5.0
Additional capital 156.6 155.9
Accumulated deficit (184.9) (185.6)
Pension liability adjustment (5.1) (5.1)
Treasury stock, at cost (shares held:
preferred - 845; common: 1,435,212
and 1,400,112, respectively) (22.8) (21.3)
------------- -------------
Total stockholders' deficit (50.9) (50.8)
------------- -------------
$ 4,029.4 $ 4,115.7
============= =============
<FN>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
</TABLE>
MAXXAM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
-------------- --------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales:
Aluminum operations $ 547.4 $ 531.1
Forest products operations 66.8 59.8
Real estate and other operations 17.4 21.3
-------------- --------------
631.6 612.2
-------------- --------------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales and operations (exclusive of
depreciation and depletion):
Aluminum operations 460.7 433.7
Forest products operations 38.0 33.1
Real estate and other operations 10.0 16.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses 44.5 44.7
Depreciation and depletion 29.4 30.6
-------------- --------------
582.6 559.0
-------------- --------------
Operating income 49.0 53.2
Other income (expense):
Investment, interest and other income
(expense) 10.9 5.3
Interest expense (53.1) (45.1)
-------------- --------------
Income before income taxes and minority interests 6.8 13.4
Provision for income taxes (2.7) (5.0)
Minority interests (3.4) (2.6)
-------------- --------------
Net income $ .7 $ 5.8
============== ==============
Net income per common and common equivalent share $ .07 $ .61
============== ==============
<FN>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
</TABLE>
MAXXAM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
------------- --------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ .7 $ 5.8
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash used for operating
activities:
Depreciation and depletion 29.4 30.6
Net sales (purchases) of marketable
securities (.9) 28.2
Minority interests 3.4 2.6
Amortization of deferred financing costs
and discounts on long-term debt 6.3 5.1
Equity in (earnings) loss of
unconsolidated affiliates, net of
dividends received 7.8 (7.0)
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting
from changes in:
Receivables (34.8) 11.3
Payable to affiliates and other
liabilities (2.9) 1.3
Inventories (7.9) (41.7)
Accrued interest (26.0) (32.6)
Prepaid expenses and other assets (27.5) (23.5)
Accounts payable (39.7) (20.9)
Accrued and deferred income taxes .1 (5.1)
Other (1.8) 1.2
------------- -------------
Net cash used for operating
activities (93.8) (44.7)
------------- -------------<PAGE>
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from disposition of property and
investments 7.1 .4
Capital expenditures (27.2) (24.3)
Investment in subsidiaries and joint ventures (7.1) (1.1)
Other (2.7) (2.2)
-------------- --------------
Net cash used for investing
activities (29.9) (27.2)
-------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net borrowings under revolving
credit agreements 42.0 90.9
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 19.0 4.2
Redemptions, repurchases of and principal
payments on long-term debt (63.7) (10.5)
Dividends paid to Kaiser's minority preferred
stockholders (2.1) (2.1)
Redemption of preference stock (1.6) (2.0)
Restricted cash deposits (12.6) -
Other (.2) 1.0
-------------- --------------
Net cash provided by (used
for) financing activities (19.2) 81.5
-------------- --------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS (142.9) 9.6
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 336.6 104.2
-------------- --------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $ 193.7 $ 113.8
============== ==============
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest $ 72.8 $ 72.6
Income taxes paid 2.1 8.8
<FN>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
</TABLE>
MAXXAM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share amounts)
1. GENERAL
The information contained in the following notes to the
consolidated financial statements is condensed from that which would appear
in the annual consolidated financial statements; accordingly, the
consolidated financial statements included herein should be reviewed in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by MAXXAM Inc.
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 (the "Form 10-K"). All references to the "Company"
include MAXXAM Inc. and its subsidiary companies unless otherwise indicated
or the context indicates otherwise. Any capitalized items used but not
defined in these Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements have
the same meaning given to them in the Form 10-K. Accounting measurements
at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than at
year end. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire
year.
The consolidated financial statements included herein are
unaudited; however, they include all adjustments of a normal recurring
nature which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly
the consolidated financial position of the Company at March 31, 1997 and
the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three months
ended March 31, 1997 and 1996. Certain reclassifications of prior period
information have been made to conform to the current presentation.
2. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, December 31,
1997 1996
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Aluminum Operations:
Finished fabricated aluminum products $ 106.3 $ 113.5
Primary aluminum and work in process 213.1 200.3
Bauxite and alumina 126.6 110.2
Operating supplies and repair and
maintenance parts 129.9 138.2
-------------- --------------
575.9 562.2
-------------- --------------
Forest Products Operations:
Lumber 53.7 55.8
Logs 11.3 16.8
-------------- --------------
65.0 72.6
-------------- --------------
$ 640.9 $ 634.8
============== ==============
</TABLE>
3. RESTRICTED CASH
Long-term receivables and other assets includes restricted cash
in the amount of $42.4 and $30.0 at March 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996,
respectively. Such restricted cash primarily represents the amount
held by the trustee under the indenture governing the Timber Notes.
4. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 31, December 31,
1997 1996
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
14% MAXXAM Senior Subordinated Reset
Notes due May 20, 2000 $ - $ 25.0
12-1/2% MAXXAM Subordinated Debentures
due December 15, 1999, net
of discount - 17.6
12% MGHI Senior Secured Notes due August
1, 2003 130.0 130.0
11-1/4% MGI Senior Secured Notes due
August 1, 2003 100.0 100.0
12-1/4% MGI Senior Secured Discount Notes
due August 1, 2003, net of discount 107.3 104.2
10-1/2% Pacific Lumber Senior Notes due
March 1, 2003 235.0 235.0
7.95% Scotia Pacific Timber
Collateralized Notes due July 20,
2015 327.4 336.1
KACC Credit Agreement 41.9 -
10-7/8% KACC Senior Notes due October 15,
2006, including premium 225.9 225.9
9-7/8% KACC Senior Notes due February 15,
2002, net of discount 224.1 224.0
12-3/4% KACC Senior Subordinated Notes
due February 1, 2003 400.0 400.0
Alpart CARIFA Loans 60.0 60.0
Other aluminum operations debt 66.7 52.0
Other notes and contracts, primarily
secured by receivables, buildings,
real estate and equipment 25.7 41.7
-------------- --------------
1,944.0 1,951.5
Less: current maturities (25.6) (69.6)
-------------- --------------
$ 1,918.4 $ 1,881.9
============== ==============
</TABLE>
5. PER SHARE INFORMATION
Per share calculations are based on the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding in each period and, if dilutive, weighted
average common equivalent shares assumed to be issued from the exercise of
common stock options based upon the average price of the Company's common
stock during the period.
New Accounting Pronouncement
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share"
("SFAS No. 128"). Under SFAS No. 128, primary earnings per share
("Primary EPS") will be replaced by basic earnings per share ("Basic EPS"),
and fully diluted earnings per share ("Fully Diluted EPS") will be replaced
by diluted earnings per share ("Diluted EPS"). Basic EPS differs from
Primary EPS in that it only includes the weighted average impact of
outstanding shares of the Company's common stock (i.e., it excludes common
stock equivalents and the dilutive effect of options, etc.). Diluted EPS is
substantially similar to Fully Diluted EPS. The provisions of SFAS No. 128
will result in the retroactive restatement of previously reported Primary
EPS and Fully Diluted EPS figures. SFAS No. 128 is effective for periods
ending after December 15, 1997, including interim periods; earlier
application is not permitted. On a pro forma basis, Basic EPS would have
been $.08 and $.67 for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. Diluted EPS would have been $.07 and $.61 for the three
months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively, which is the same as
the amounts reported previously for Primary and Fully Diluted EPS.
6. CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Contingencies
Kaiser and KACC are subject to a number of environmental laws and
regulations, to fines or penalties assessed for alleged breaches of such
environmental laws and regulations, and to claims and litigation based upon
such laws. KACC currently is subject to a number of lawsuits under CERCLA,
and, along with certain other entities, has been named as a potentially
responsible party for remedial costs at certain third-party sites listed on
the National Priorities List under CERCLA.
Based on Kaiser's evaluation of these and other environmental
matters, Kaiser has established environmental accruals, primarily related
to potential solid waste disposal and soil and groundwater remediation
matters. At March 31, 1997, the balance of such accruals, which are
primarily included in other noncurrent liabilities, was $32.7. These
environmental accruals represent Kaiser's estimate of costs reasonably
expected to be incurred based on presently enacted laws and regulations,
currently available facts, existing technology and Kaiser's assessment of
the likely remediation actions to be taken. Kaiser expects that these
remediation actions will be taken over the next several years and estimates
that annual expenditures to be charged to these environmental accruals will
be approximately $3.0 to $9.0 for the years 1997 through 2001 and
an aggregate of approximately $6.0 thereafter.
As additional facts are developed and definitive remediation
plans and necessary regulatory approvals for implementation of remediation
are established or alternative technologies are developed, changes in these
and other factors may result in actual costs exceeding the current
environmental accruals. Kaiser believes that it is reasonably possible
that costs associated with these environmental matters may exceed current
accruals by amounts that could range, in the aggregate, up to an estimated
$22.0 and that, subject to further regulatory review and approval,
the factors upon which a substantial portion of this estimate is based are
expected to be resolved during 1997. While uncertainties are inherent in
the final outcome of these environmental matters, and it is impossible to
determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred, management
believes that the resolution of such uncertainties should not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
Asbestos Contingencies
KACC is a defendant in a number of lawsuits, some of which
involve claims of multiple persons, in which the plaintiffs allege that
certain of their injuries were caused by, among other things, exposure to
asbestos during, and as a result of, their employment or association with
KACC or exposure to products containing asbestos produced or sold by KACC.
The lawsuits generally relate to products KACC has not manufactured for at
least 15 years. At March 31, 1997, the number of such claims pending was
approximately 72,500 as compared with 71,100 at December 31, 1996. In
1996, approximately 21,100 of such claims were received and 9,700 were
settled or dismissed. During the quarter ended March 31, 1997,
approximately 2,600 of such claims were received and 1,200 of such claims
were settled or dismissed.
A substantial portion of the asbestos-related claims that were
filed and served on KACC during 1995 and 1996 were filed in Texas. KACC
has been advised by its counsel that, although there can be no assurance,
the increase in pending claims may have been attributable in part to tort
reform legislation in Texas. Although asbestos-related claims are
currently exempt from certain aspects of the Texas tort reform legislation,
KACC has been advised that efforts to remove the asbestos-related
exemption in the tort reform legislation as well as other developments in
the legislative and legal environment in Texas may be responsible for the
accelerated pace of new claims experienced in late 1995 and its continuance
in 1996, albeit at a somewhat reduced rate.
Based on past experience and reasonably anticipated future
activity, Kaiser has established an accrual for estimated asbestos-related
costs for claims filed and estimated to be filed through 2008. There are
inherent uncertainties involved in estimating asbestos-related costs, and
Kaiser's actual costs could exceed or be less than these estimates.
Kaiser's accrual was calculated based on the current and anticipated number
of asbestos-related claims, the prior timing and amounts of asbestos-
elated payments, and the advice of Wharton Levin Ehrmantraut Klein & Nash,
P.A. with respect to the current state of the law related to asbestos
claims. Accordingly, an estimated asbestos-related cost accrual of $134.4,
before consideration of insurance recoveries, is included
primarily in other noncurrent liabilities at March 31, 1997. While Kaiser
does not believe there is a reasonable basis for estimating such costs
beyond 2008 and, accordingly, no accrual has been recorded for such costs
which may be incurred beyond 2008, there is a reasonable possibility that
such costs may continue beyond 2008, and such costs may be substantial.
Kaiser estimates that annual future cash payments in connection with such
litigation will be approximately $8.0 to $17.0 for each of the years 1997
through 2001, and an aggregate of approximately $80.0 thereafter.
Kaiser believes that KACC has insurance coverage available to
recover a substantial portion of its asbestos-related costs. Claims for
recovery from some of KACC's insurance carriers are currently subject to
pending litigation and other carriers have raised certain defenses, which
have resulted in delays in recovering costs from the insurance carriers.
The timing and amount of ultimate recoveries from these insurance carriers
are dependent upon the resolution of these disputes. Kaiser believes,
based on prior insurance-related recoveries in respect of asbestos-related
claims, existing insurance policies, and the advice of Thelen, Marrin,
Johnson & Bridges LLP with respect to applicable insurance coverage law
relating to the terms and conditions of these policies, that substantial
recoveries from the insurance carriers are probable. Accordingly, an
estimated aggregate insurance recovery of $112.0, determined on the
same basis as the asbestos-related cost accrual, is recorded primarily in
long-term receivables and other assets at March 31, 1997.
Kaiser continues to monitor claims activity, the status of
lawsuits (including settlement initiatives), legislative progress and
costs incurred in order to ascertain whether an adjustment to the existing
accruals should be made to the extent that historical experience may differ
significantly from Kaiser's underlying assumptions. While uncertainties
are inherent in the final outcome of these asbestos matters and it is
presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be
incurred and insurance recoveries that will be received, Kaiser
believes that, based on the factors discussed in the preceding paragraphs,
the resolution of asbestos-related uncertainties and the incurrence of
asbestos-related costs net of related insurance recoveries should not have
a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.
OTS Contingency and Related Matters
On December 26, 1995, the OTS initiated formal administrative
proceedings against the Company and others by filing the Notice. The
Notice alleges misconduct by the Company, Federated, Mr. Charles Hurwitz
and others (the "respondents") with respect to the failure of USAT, a
wholly owned subsidiary of UFG. The Notice claims that the Company was a
savings and loan holding company, that with others it controlled USAT, and
that it was therefore obligated to maintain the net worth of USAT. The
Notice makes numerous other allegations against the Company and the other
respondents, including, among other things, allegations that through USAT
it was involved in prohibited transactions with Drexel, Burnham, Lambert
Inc. The OTS, among other things, seeks unspecified damages in excess of
$138.0 from the Company and Federated, civil money penalties and a removal
from, and prohibition against the Company and the other respondents
engaging in, the banking industry. The date for the hearing on the
merits is scheduled for September 22, 1997.
On August 2, 1995, the FDIC filed the FDIC action in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Texas (the "Court"). The
original complaint against Mr. Hurwitz seeks damages in excess of $250.0
based on the allegation that Mr. Hurwitz was a controlling shareholder, de
facto senior officer and director of USAT, and was involved in certain
decisions which contributed to the insolvency of USAT. The original
complaint further alleges, among other things, that Mr. Hurwitz was
obligated to ensure that UFG, Federated and MAXXAM maintained the net worth
of USAT. The Court has joined the OTS as a party to the FDIC action and
granted the motions to intervene filed by the Company and three other
respondents in the OTS administrative proceeding. The OTS is seeking to be
dismissed from the FDIC action. On January 15, 1997, the FDIC filed an
amended complaint which seeks, conditioned on the OTS prevailing in its
administrative proceeding, unspecified damages from Mr. Hurwitz relating to
amounts the OTS does not collect from the Company and Federated with
respect to alleged obligations to maintain USAT's net worth.
The Company's bylaws provide for indemnification of its officers
and directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. The Company
is obligated to advance defense costs to its officers and directors,
subject to the individual's obligation to repay such amount if it is
ultimately determined that the individual was not entitled to
indemnification. In addition, the Company's indemnity obligation can,
under certain circumstances, include amounts other than defense costs,
including judgments and settlements. The Company has concluded that it is
unable to determine a reasonable estimate of the loss (or range of loss),
if any, that could result from these contingencies. Accordingly, it is
impossible to assess the ultimate outcome of the foregoing matters or its
potential impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results
of operations or liquidity.
Other Matters
The Company is involved in various other claims, lawsuits and
other proceedings relating to a wide variety of matters. While
uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of such matters and it is
presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be
incurred, management believes that the resolution of such uncertainties and
the incurrence of such costs should not have a material adverse effect on
the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED HEDGING PROGRAMS
At March 31, 1997, the net unrealized loss, including unamortized
net option premiums, on KACC's position in aluminum forward sales and
option contracts, (based on an average price of $1,636 per ton ($.74 per
pound) of primary aluminum), natural gas and fuel oil forward purchase and
option contracts, and forward foreign exchange contracts, was approximately
$19.2.
Alumina and Aluminum
Kaiser's earnings are sensitive to changes in the prices of
alumina, primary aluminum and fabricated aluminum products, and also depend
to a significant degree upon the volume and mix of all products sold.
Primary aluminum prices have historically been subject to significant
cyclical fluctuations. During the period January 1, 1993 through March
31, 1997, the average Midwest United States transaction price for
primary aluminum has ranged from approximately $.50 to $1.00 per pound.
Alumina prices as well as fabricated aluminum product prices (which vary
considerably among products) are significantly influenced by changes in the
price of primary aluminum but generally lag behind primary aluminum price
changes by up to three months.
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, KACC enters
into hedging transactions to provide price risk management in respect of
the net exposure of earnings resulting from (i) anticipated sales of
alumina, primary aluminum and fabricated aluminum products, less (ii)
expected purchases of certain items, such as aluminum scrap, rolling ingot
and bauxite, whose prices fluctuate with the price of primary aluminum.
Forward sales contracts are used by KACC to effectively lock-in or fix the
price that KACC will receive for its shipments. KACC also uses option
contracts (i) to establish a minimum price for its product shipments, (ii)
to establish a "collar" or range of prices for KACC's anticipated sales,
and/or (iii) to permit KACC to realize possible upside price movements. As
of March 31, 1997, KACC had sold forward, at fixed prices, approximately
51,750, 93,600 and 24,000 tons of primary aluminum with respect to 1997,
1998 and 1999, respectively. As of March 31, 1997, KACC had also purchased
put options to establish a minimum price for approximately 154,750 and
52,000 tons with respect to 1997 and 1998, respectively, and had entered
into option contracts that established a price range for an additional
103,000, 231,600 and 97,500 tons for 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
As of March 31, 1997, KACC had sold forward virtually
all of the alumina available to it in excess of its projected internal
smelting requirements for 1997, 1998 and 1999 at prices indexed to future
prices of primary aluminum.
Energy
KACC is exposed to energy price risk from fluctuating prices for
fuel oil and natural gas consumed in the production process. Accordingly,
KACC from time to time in the ordinary course of business enters into
hedging transactions with major suppliers of energy and energy related
financial instruments. As of March 31, 1997, KACC had a combination of
fixed price purchase and option contracts for the purchase of approximately
44,000 MMBtu of natural gas per day during the 1997, and for 25,000 MMBtu
of natural gas per day for 1998. As of March 31, 1997, KACC also held
option contracts for an average of 213,000 barrels of fuel oil per month
for 1997 and 222,000 barrels of fuel oil per month for 1998.
Foreign Currency
KACC enters into forward exchange contracts to hedge material
cash commitments to foreign subsidiaries or affiliates. At March 31, 1997,
KACC had net forward foreign exchange contracts totaling approximately
$127.1 for the purchase of 165.5 Australian dollars from April 1997
through June 1998, in respect of its commitments for 1997 and 1988
expenditures denominated in Australian dollars.
MAXXAM INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following should be read in conjunction with the response to
Part I, Item 1 of this Report and Items 7 and 8 of the Form 10-K. Any
capitalized terms used but not defined in this Item have the same meaning
given to them in the Form 10-K.
This section contains statements which constitute "forward-
looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements appear in a number of places in this
Form 10-Q. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "estimates," "will,"
"should," "plans" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other
variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of
strategy. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance and involve significant risks and
uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from those in
the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These
factors include the effectiveness of management's strategies and decisions,
general economic and business conditions, developments in technology, new
or modified statutory or regulatory requirements and changing prices and
market conditions. This section and the Company's Form 10-K identify other
factors that could cause such differences. No assurance can be given that
these are all of the factors that could cause actual results to vary
materially from the forward-looking statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company operates in three principal industries: aluminum,
through its majority owned subsidiary, Kaiser, a fully integrated aluminum
producer; forest products, through MGI and its wholly owned subsidiaries,
principally Pacific Lumber and Britt; real estate investment and
development, managed through MAXXAM Property Company; and other commercial
operations through various other wholly owned subsidiaries. MGHI owns 100%
of MGI and is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. All references to
the "Company," "Kaiser," "MGHI," "MGI" and "Pacific Lumber" refer to the
respective companies and their subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or
the context indicates otherwise.
ALUMINUM OPERATIONS
Aluminum operations account for a substantial portion of the
Company's revenues and operating results. Kaiser, through its principal
subsidiary KACC, operates in two business segments: bauxite and alumina,
and aluminum processing. As an integrated aluminum producer, Kaiser uses a
portion of its bauxite, alumina and primary aluminum production for
additional processing at certain of its facilities.
Profit Enhancement and Cost Reduction Initiative
Kaiser has set a goal of achieving significant cost reductions
and other profit improvements during 1997, with the full effect planned to
be realized in 1998. The initiative is based on Kaiser's conclusion that
the current level of performance of its existing facilities and businesses
will not achieve the level of profits Kaiser considers satisfactory based
upon historic long-term average prices for primary aluminum and alumina.
To achieve this goal, Kaiser plans reductions in production costs,
decreases in corporate selling, general and administrative expenses, and
enhancements to product mix. There can be no assurance that the initiative
will result in the desired cost reductions and other profit improvements.
Recent Events
In April 1997 KACC announced that it had signed a letter of
intent with Reynolds Metal Company ("Reynolds") to purchase Reynolds'
McCook, Illinois, sheet and plate plant and Bellwood, Virginia, extrusions
plant. The transaction is subject to regulatory and board approvals,
negotiation and execution of definitive agreements, and other customary
closing conditions; accordingly, no assurances can be given that the
transaction will ultimately be consummated.
Summary
The following table presents selected operational and financial
information for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996. The
information presented in the table is in millions of dollars except
shipments and prices.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Shipments: (1)
Alumina 385.5 476.2
Aluminum products:
Primary aluminum 78.5 74.8
Fabricated aluminum products 93.9 77.2
-------------- --------------
Total aluminum products 172.4 152.0
============== ==============
Average realized sales price:
Alumina (per ton) $ 190 $ 208
Primary aluminum (per pound) .75 .72
Net sales:
Bauxite and alumina:
Alumina $ 73.2 $ 99.0
Other (2) (3) 26.6 24.4
-------------- --------------
Total bauxite and alumina 99.8 123.4
-------------- --------------
Aluminum processing:
Primary aluminum 129.2 119.1
Fabricated aluminum products 314.4 284.9
Other (3) 4.0 3.7
-------------- --------------
Total aluminum processing 447.6 407.7
-------------- --------------
Total net sales $ 547.4 $ 531.1
============== ==============
Operating income $ 32.8 $ 41.8
============== ==============
Income before income taxes and minority
interests $ 7.9 $ 18.8
============== ==============
Capital expenditures $ 21.8 $ 19.8
============== ==============
<FN>
- ---------------
(1) Shipments are expressed in thousands of metric tons. A metric ton is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds.
(2) Includes net sales of bauxite.
(3) Includes the portion of net sales attributable to minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries.
</TABLE>
Overview
Kaiser's operating results are sensitive to changes in the prices
of alumina, primary aluminum and fabricated aluminum products, and also
depend to a significant degree on the volume and mix of all products sold
and on KACC's hedging strategies. Primary aluminum prices have
historically been subject to significant cyclical fluctuations.
Alumina prices as well as fabricated aluminum product prices (which vary
considerably among products) are significantly influenced by changes in the
price of primary aluminum but generally lag behind primary aluminum price
changes by up to three months.
During the first half of 1996, the AMT Price for primary aluminum
remained relatively stable in the $.75 per pound range. However, during the
second half of the year the AMT Price fell, reaching a low of $.65 per pound for
October 1996, before recovering late in the year. During the period 1993-March
31, 1997, the AMT Price for primary aluminum ranged from approximately $.50 to
$1.00 per pound. The AMT Price for primary aluminum for the week ended April
11, 1997, was approximately $.76 per pound.
Net Sales--Bauxite and Alumina
Net sales of alumina decreased by 26% for the quarter ended
March 31, 1997, from the comparable period in the prior year as a result
of a 19% decrease in shipments of alumina and a 9% decline in average
prices realized from the sale of alumina. The reduction in average prices
realized reflects the substantial decline in primary aluminum prices
experienced in the latter half of 1996 discussed above.
Net Sales--Aluminum Processing
Net sales of primary aluminum increased by 8% for the quarter
ended March 31, 1997, from the comparable prior year period as a result of
a 3% increase in average prices realized and a 5% increase in shipments.
Net sales of fabricated aluminum products were up 10% for the quarter ended
March 31, 1997 as compared to the prior year period as a result of a 22%
increase in shipments. The impact of increased product shipments on net
sales was partially offset by a 9% decrease in average prices realized from
the sale of fabricated aluminum products for the quarter ended March 31,
1997.
Operating Income
Operating income for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 declined
from the prior year comparative period as a result of lower net sales from
bauxite and alumina as discussed above, and lower margins on fabricated
aluminum products due to the 9% decrease in realized prices discussed
above. These decreases were partially offset by approximately $5.0 million
of operating income realized in the first quarter of 1997 from the
settlement of certain energy service contracts.
FOREST PRODUCTS OPERATIONS
The Company's forest products operations are conducted by MGI
through its principal operating subsidiaries. MGI's business is seasonal
in that the forest products business generally experiences lower first
quarter sales due largely to the general decline in construction-related
activity during the winter months. Accordingly, MGI's results for any one
quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the
full year. The following table presents selected operational and financial
information for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996. The
information presented in the table is in millions of dollars except
shipments and prices.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
---------------------------
1997 1996
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Shipments:
Lumber: (1)
Redwood upper grades 13.0 10.4
Redwood common grades 57.2 57.3
Douglas-fir upper grades 2.5 2.2
Douglas-fir common grades 19.4 19.3
Other 3.9 1.9
------------- -------------
Total lumber 96.0 91.1
============= =============
Logs (2) 2.5 5.9
============= =============
Wood chips (3) 60.2 49.0
============= =============
Average sales price:
Lumber: (4)
Redwood upper grades $ 1,322 $ 1,386
Redwood common grades 505 482
Douglas-fir upper grades 1,211 1,153
Douglas-fir common grades 486 378
Logs (4) 478 469
Wood chips (5) 75 87
Net sales:
Lumber, net of discount $ 59.1 $ 51.9
Logs 1.2 2.8
Wood chips 4.5 4.3
Cogeneration power 1.0 .4
Other 1.0 .4
------------- -------------
Total net sales $ 66.8 $ 59.8
============= =============
Operating income $ 18.8 $ 16.6
============= =============
Operating cash flow (6) $ 25.4 $ 23.1
============= =============
Income before income taxes and minority
interests $ .3 $ .6
============= =============
Capital expenditures $ 2.4 $ 2.8
============= =============
<FN>
- ---------------
(1) Lumber shipments are expressed in millions of board feet.
(2) Log shipments are expressed in millions of feet, net Scribner scale.
(3) Wood chip shipments are expressed in thousands of bone dry units of 2,400 pounds.
(4) Dollars per thousand board feet.
(5) Dollars per bone dry unit.
(6) Operating income before depletion and depreciation, also referred to as "EBITDA."
</TABLE>
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 1997 increased
from the three months ended March 31, 1996, principally due to higher
average realized prices for common grade redwood and Douglas-fir lumber and
increased shipments of manufactured upper grade redwood lumber.
Operating income
Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 1997
increased from the three months ended March 31, 1996, principally due to
the increase in sales discussed above.
Income before income taxes and minority interests
Income before income taxes and minority interests for the three
months ended March 31, 1997 was substantially unchanged from the three
months ended March 31, 1996. While operating income was higher as
discussed above, investment, interest and other income was lower primarily
due to lower earnings from marketable securities.
REAL ESTATE AND OTHER OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
-------------- --------------
(In millions of dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 17.4 $ 21.3
Operating income (loss) .4 (1.7)
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority
interests 3.1 (.8)
</TABLE>
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 1997 declined from
the three months ended March 31, 1996, principally due to lower revenues
from resort and commercial operations reflecting various asset dispositions
during 1996 and the first quarter of 1997.
Operating income (loss)
For the three months ended March 31, 1997, the Company's real
estate and other operations had operating income of $.4 million as compared
to a loss of $1.7 million for the same period in 1996, principally due to
operating income attributable to SHRP, Ltd., as compared to an operating
loss by SHRP, Ltd. in the 1996 first quarter, and a bulk land sale at the
Fountain Hills development in Arizona.
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
The Company's real estate and other operations had income before
income taxes and minority interests for the three months ended March 31,
1997, as compared to a loss for the same period in 1996. In addition to
the improvements in operating income discussed above, investment, interest
and other income for the three months ended March 31, 1997 increased over
the comparable prior year period due to a gain from the sale of a retail
center from the RTC Portfolio.
OTHER ITEMS NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996
-------------- --------------
(In millions of dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
Operating loss $ (3.0) $ (3.5)
Loss before income taxes and
minority interests (4.5) (5.2)
</TABLE>
Operating loss
The operating losses represent corporate general and
administrative expenses that are not allocated to the Company's industry
segments. The operating loss for the three months ended March 31, 1997 was
substantially unchanged from the three months ended March 31, 1996.
Loss before income taxes and minority interests
The loss before income taxes and minority interests includes
operating losses, investment, interest and other income (expense) and
interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, that
are not attributable to the Company's industry segments. The loss for the
three months ended March 31, 1997 decreased from the three months ended
March 31, 1996, principally due to higher gains from marketable securities
and reductions in other noncash expenses.
Minority interests
Minority interests represent the minority stockholders' interest
in the Company's aluminum operations and minority partners' interest in
SHRP, Ltd.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
PARENT COMPANY AND MGHI
The various credit instruments of MGHI, KACC, MGI, Pacific
Lumber and Scotia Pacific contain various covenants which, among other
things, limit the ability of such entities to incur additional indebtedness
and liens, to engage in transactions with affiliates, to pay dividends and
to make investments. As of March 31, 1997, no dividends could be paid by
MGHI and $0.3 million of dividends could be paid by MGI. Pursuant to the
terms of the KACC Credit Agreement, Kaiser is prohibited from paying any
dividends with respect to its common stock. The most restrictive covenants
governing debt of the Company's real estate and other subsidiaries would
not restrict payment to the Company of all nonrestricted cash and unused
borrowing availability for such subsidiaries (approximately $14.1 million
could be paid as of March 31, 1997).
In January 1997, the Company used the proceeds from the
Intercompany Note to redeem its 12-1/2% Subordinated Debentures and 14%
Senior Subordinated Reset Notes together with accrued interest thereon, for
$43.3 million.
Kaiser has an effective shelf registration statement covering the
offering of up to 10 million shares of Kaiser common stock owned by the
Company.
The Company has stated that from time to time it may purchase
its common stock on national exchanges or in privately negotiated
transactions. During the three months ended March 31, 1997, the Company
purchased 35,100 shares of its common stock.
As of March 31, 1997, the Company (excluding its subsidiaries)
had cash and marketable securities of approximately $128.0 million and
available borrowings under the Custodial Trust Agreement of $25.0 million.
The Company believes that its existing resources, together with the cash
available from subsidiaries and other sources of financing, will be
sufficient to fund its working capital requirements for the next year.
With respect to its long-term liquidity, the Company believes that its
existing cash and cash resources, together with the cash proceeds from the
sale of assets and distributions from its subsidiaries should be sufficient
to meet its working capital requirements. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company's cash resources, together with the cash
proceeds from the sale of assets, distributions from its subsidiaries and
other sources of financing, will be sufficient for such purposes. Any
adverse outcome of the litigation described in Note 6 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements could have a material adverse affect on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. See
Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the
Company's material contingencies.
ALUMINUM OPERATIONS
Kaiser has an effective shelf registration statement covering the
offering from time to time of up to $150.0 million of equity securities.
On December 31, 1997, unless either previously redeemed by Kaiser
or converted at the option of the holder, each of the outstanding shares of
PRIDES will mandatorily convert into one share of Kaiser's Common Stock,
subject to adjustment in certain events.
At March 31, 1997, $231.9 million (of which $73.9 million could
have been used for letters of credit) was available to KACC under the KACC
Credit Agreement. Loans under the KACC Credit Agreement bear interest at a
premium (which varies based on the results of a financial test) over either
a base rate or LIBOR, at the Company's option. During the first quarter of
1997, the average per annum interest rate was 9.75%.
Kaiser's capital expenditures during the first quarter of 1997
were $21.8 million, which were used primarily to improve production
efficiency, reduce operating costs, expand capacity at existing facilities,
and construct new facilities. Kaiser's micromill facility, which was
constructed in Nevada during 1996 as a demonstration and production facility,
achieved operational start-up by year-end 1996. Kaiser expects that the
Nevada micromill facility will be in a start-up mode for the first half of 1997
and will be able to commence limited product shipments to customers in the
latter part of the year.
Total consolidated capital expenditures (of which approximately
7% is expected to be funded by Kaiser's minority partners in certain
foreign joint ventures) are expected to be between $70.0 and $140.0 million
per annum in each of 1997 through 1999. Management continues to evaluate
numerous projects all of which require substantial capital, including
Kaiser's micromill project, the previously discussed transaction with
Reynolds, and other potential opportunities both in the United States and
overseas.
In 1995, Kaiser Yellow River Investment Limited ("KYRIL"), a
subsidiary of Kaiser, entered into a joint venture agreement and related
agreements (the "Joint Venture Agreements") with the Lanzhou Aluminum
Smelters ("LAS") of the China National Nonferrous Metals Industry
Corporation (the "CNNC") relating to the formation and operation of Yellow
River Aluminum Industry Company Limited, a Sino-foreign joint equity
enterprise (the "Joint Venture") organized under the laws of the People's
Republic of China ("PRC"). KYRIL contributed $9.0 million to the capital
of the Joint Venture in July 1995. The parties to the Joint Venture are
engaged in discussions concerning the future of the Joint Venture. At a
meeting of the board of directors of the Joint Venture held in January
1997, the Joint Venture directors adopted a resolution that, among other
things, (i) extended until June 30, 1997, discussions concerning the future
of the Joint Venture, (ii) provided that KYRIL granted to LAS the right to
seek a buyer to purchase KYRIL's equity interest in the Joint Venture, and
(iii) provided that if a buyer to purchase KYRIL's equity interest in the
Joint Venture was not found by June 30, 1997, the Joint Venture would be
terminated and dissolved. More recent negotiations between KYRIL and LAS
have focused on LAS and/or the CNNC making a payment to KRYIL in return for
its existing interest in the Joint Venture. However, no agreement has been
reached concerning the amount of or terms for any such payment.
Governmental approval in the PRC will be necessary in order to implement
any arrangements agreed to by the parties, and there can be no assurance
such approvals will be obtained.
Kaiser believes that its existing cash resources, together with
cash flow from operations and borrowings under the KACC Credit
Agreement, will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital and capital
expenditure requirements for the next year. With respect to its long-term
liquidity, Kaiser believes that its history of prior operating cash flow,
together with its ability to obtain both short- and long-term financing,
should provide sufficient funds to meet its long-term working capital and
capital expenditure requirements.
FOREST PRODUCTS OPERATIONS
As of March 31, 1997, $39.1 million of borrowings was available
under the Pacific Lumber Credit Agreement, of which $4.7 million was
available for letters of credit and $30.0 million was restricted to
timberland acquisitions. No borrowings were outstanding as of March 31,
1997, and letters of credit outstanding amounted to $10.3 million.
MGI and its subsidiaries anticipate that cash from operations,
together with existing cash, marketable securities and available sources of
financing, will be sufficient to fund their working capital and capital
expenditure requirements for the next year. With respect to their long-
term liquidity, MGI and its subsidiaries believe that their existing cash
and cash equivalents, together with their ability to generate sufficient
levels of cash from operations and their ability to obtain both short- and
long-term financing, should provide sufficient funds to meet their working
capital and capital expenditure requirements. However, due to their highly
leveraged condition, MGI and its subsidiaries (and in turn MGHI) are more
sensitive than less leveraged companies to factors affecting their
operations, including governmental regulation affecting their timber
harvesting practices (see "--Trends" below), increased competition from
other lumber producers or alternative building products and general
economic conditions.
REAL ESTATE AND OTHER OPERATIONS
As of March 31, 1997, the Company's real estate and other
subsidiaries had approximately $10.6 million available for use under the
MCOP Credit Agreement. The Company believes that the existing cash and
credit facilities of its real estate and other subsidiaries are sufficient
to fund the working capital and capital expenditure requirements of such
subsidiaries for the next year. With respect to the long-term liquidity of
such subsidiaries, the Company believes that their ability to generate cash
from the sale of their existing real estate, together with their ability to
obtain financing, should provide sufficient funds to meet their working
capital and capital expenditure requirements.
TRENDS
FOREST PRODUCTS OPERATIONS
Regulatory and Environmental Matters
Pacific Lumber's operations are subject to a variety of
California and federal laws and regulations dealing with timber harvesting,
endangered species and critical habitat, and air and water quality.
Moreover, these laws and regulations are modified from time to time and are
subject to judicial and administrative interpretation. Compliance with
such laws, regulations and judicial and administrative interpretations,
together with the cost of litigation incurred in connection with certain
timber harvesting operations of Pacific Lumber, have increased the cost of
logging operations. Pacific Lumber is subject to certain pending matters
described below which could have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of
Pacific Lumber, and in turn MGI and MGHI. There can be no assurance that
certain pending or future governmental regulations, legislation, judicial
or administrative decisions or California ballot initiatives will not have
a material adverse affect on MGI and in turn MGHI.
In May 1996, the USFWS published the Final Designation of
critical habitat for the marbled murrelet, a coastal seabird, which
designated over four million acres as critical habitat for the marbled
murrelet. Although nearly all of the designated habitat is public land,
approximately 33,000 acres of Pacific Lumber's timberlands are included in
the Final Designation, the substantial portion of such acreage being young
growth timberlands. In order to mitigate the impact of the Final
Designation, particularly with respect to timberlands occupied by the
marbled murrelet, Pacific Lumber over the last few years has attempted to
develop the Murrelet HCP. Due to, among other things, the unfavorable
response of the USFWS to Pacific Lumber's initial Murrelet HCP efforts,
Pacific Lumber and its subsidiaries filed the Takings Litigation alleging
that certain portions of its timberlands have been "taken" and seeking just
compensation. Pursuant to the Headwaters Agreement entered into by Pacific
Lumber, the Company, the United States and California on September 28, 1996
as described below, the Takings Litigation has been stayed by the Court at
the request of the parties.
It is impossible for Pacific Lumber to determine the potential
adverse effect of the Final Designation on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity until such time as various
regulatory and legal issues are resolved; however, if Pacific Lumber is
unable to harvest, or is severely limited in harvesting, on timberlands
designated as critical habitat for the marbled murrelet, such effect could
be materially adverse to Pacific Lumber, and in turn MGI and MGHI. If
Pacific Lumber is unable to harvest or is severely limited in harvesting,
it intends to seek just compensation from the appropriate governmental
agencies on the grounds that such restrictions constitute a governmental
taking. There continue to be other regulatory actions and lawsuits seeking
to have other species listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA
and/or the CESA and to designate critical habitat for such species. For
example, the NMFS has announced that by April 25, 1997, it will make
a final determination concerning whether to list the coho salmon under the
ESA in northern California, including, potentially, lands owned by Pacific
Lumber. It is uncertain what impact, if any, such listings and/or
designations of critical habitat would have on the consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity of Pacific Lumber, and in turn
MGI and MGHI.
In 1994, the BOF adopted certain regulations regarding compliance
with long-term sustained yield ("LTSY") objectives. These regulations
require that timber companies project timber growth and harvest on their
timberlands over a 100-year planning period and establish a LTSY harvest
level that takes into account environmental and economic considerations.
Timber companies must submit an SYP which demonstrates that the average
annual harvest over any rolling ten-year period will not exceed the LTSY
harvest level and that Pacific Lumber's projected timber inventory is
capable of sustaining the LTSY harvest level in the last decade of the 100-
ear planning period. On December 17, 1996, Pacific Lumber submitted a
proposed SYP to the CDF. The proposed SYP sets forth an LTSY harvest level
substantially the same as Pacific Lumber's average annual timber harvest
over the last six years. The proposed SYP also indicates that Pacific
Lumber's average annual timber harvest during the first decade of the SYP
would approximate the LTSY harvest level. During the second decade of the
proposed SYP, Pacific Lumber's average annual timber harvest would be
approximately 8% less than that proposed for the first decade. The SYP,
when approved, will be valid for ten years. Thereafter, revised SYPs will
be prepared every decade that will address the LTSY harvest level based
upon reassessment of changes in the resource base and protection of public
resources.
The proposed SYP assumes that the transactions contemplated by
the Headwaters Agreement will be consummated and that the Multi-Species HCP
will permit Pacific Lumber to harvest its timberlands (including over the
next two decades a substantial portion of its old growth timberlands not
transferred pursuant to the Headwaters Agreement) to achieve maximum
sustained yield. The SYP is subject to review and approval by the CDF, and
there can be no assurance that the SYP will be approved in its proposed
form. Until the SYP is reviewed and approved, Pacific Lumber is unable to
predict the impact that these regulations will have on its future timber
harvesting practices. It is possible that the results of the review and
approval process could require Pacific Lumber to reduce its timber harvest
in future years from the harvest levels set forth in the proposed SYP.
Pacific Lumber believes it would be able to mitigate the effect of any
required reduction in harvest level by acquisitions of additional
timberlands and making corresponding amendments to its SYP; however, there
can be no assurance that Pacific Lumber would be able to do so, and the
amount of such acquisitions would be limited by Pacific Lumber's available
financial resources. Pacific Lumber is unable to predict the ultimate
impact the sustained yield regulations will have on its future financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
Various groups and individuals have filed objections with the CDF
and the BOF regarding the CDF's and the BOF's actions and rulings with
respect to certain of Pacific Lumber's THPs and other timber harvesting
operations, and Pacific Lumber expects that such groups and individuals
will continue to file such objections. In addition, lawsuits are pending
or threatened which seek to prevent Pacific Lumber from implementing
certain of its approved THPs or which challenge other operations by Pacific
Lumber. These challenges have severely restricted Pacific Lumber's ability
to harvest old growth timber on its property. To date, challenges with
respect to Pacific Lumber's THPs relating to young growth timber and to its
other operations have been limited; however, no assurance can be given as
to the extent of such challenges in the future. Pacific Lumber believes
that environmentally focused challenges to its timber harvesting and other
operations are likely to occur in the future, particularly with respect to
virgin and residual old growth timber. Although such challenges have
delayed or prevented Pacific Lumber from conducting a portion of its
operations, they have not had a material adverse effect on Pacific Lumber's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Nevertheless, it is impossible to predict the future nature or degree of
such challenges or their ultimate impact on the consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity of Pacific Lumber, and in turn
MGI and MGHI.
Headwaters Agreement
On September 28, 1996, the Pacific Lumber Parties entered into
the Headwaters Agreement with the United States and California. The
Headwaters Agreement provides the framework for the acquisition by the
United States and California of the approximately 5,600 acres of Pacific
Lumber's timberlands commonly referred to as the Headwaters Forest and the
Elk Head Springs Forest (collectively, "Headwaters Timberlands"). A
substantial portion of the Headwaters Timberlands consist of virgin old
growth timberlands. The Headwaters Timberlands would be transferred in
exchange for (a) property and other consideration (possibly including cash)
from the United States and California having an aggregate fair market value
of $300 million and (b) approximately 7,755 acres of adjacent timberlands
to be acquired by the United States and California ("Elk River
Timberlands") from a third party.
The Headwaters Agreement also provides, among other things, for
expedited processing by the United States of a Permit (an incidental take
permit) to be based upon a Multi-Species HCP covering (a) the Resulting
Pacific Lumber Timber Property (the property Pacific Lumber will own after
consummation of the Headwaters Agreement) and (b) the Headwaters
Timberlands and the 1,900 acres of additional timberlands to be acquired
and retained by the United States and California (both as conserved
habitat). The agreement also requires expedited processing by California
of an SYP covering the Resulting Pacific Lumber Timber Property.
On December 5, 1996, the United States and California each
furnished a list of properties consisting of oil and gas interests,
timberlands and a variety of other real estate properties for Pacific
Lumber's review and approval. Neither list was accompanied by the
requisite background information, although both lists did indicate that
additional information would be made available. On December 10, 1996,
Pacific Lumber wrote to the United States and California, stating, among
other things, that the requisite background information had not been
furnished, requesting the missing information and indicating that certain
of the properties did not appear to be "available," as legislative action
would be required for exchange of certain of the properties. In February
1997, as permitted by the Headwaters Agreement, Pacific Lumber notified
California that its presented properties were not acceptable.
As part of the Headwaters Agreement, the Pacific Lumber Parties
agreed to not enter the Headwaters Forest or the Elk Head Forest to conduct
logging operations, including salvage logging (the "Moratorium"). The
Moratorium was to terminate if by July 28, 1997 the parties had not
achieved the Specified Items to their respective satisfaction. On March
11, 1997, the Pacific Lumber Parties agreed to amend the Headwaters
Agreement to extend the period of time during which these closing
conditions must be met to February 17, 1998. The extension is, however,
subject to the achievement of certain milestones toward completion of the
Headwaters Agreement. The parties have agreed to execute an amendment to
the Headwaters Agreement evidencing these modifications.
Closing of the Headwaters Agreement is subject to various
conditions, including (a) acquisition by the government of the Elk River
Timberlands from a third party, (b) approval of an SYP and a Multi-Species
HCP and issuance of a Permit, each in form and substance satisfactory to
Pacific Lumber, (c) the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service and the
California Franchise Tax Board of closing agreements in form and substance
sought by and satisfactory to the Pacific Lumber Parties, (d) the absence
of a judicial decision in any litigation brought by third parties that any
party reasonably believes will significantly delay or impair the
transactions described in the Headwaters Agreement, and (e) the dismissal
with prejudice at closing of the Takings Litigation. The parties to the
Headwaters Agreement are working to satisfy these conditions; however,
there can be no assurance that the Headwaters Agreement will be
consummated.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Reference is made to Item 3 of the Form 10-K for information
concerning material legal proceedings with respect to the Company. The
following material developments have occurred with respect to such legal
proceedings. Any capitalized or italicized terms used but not defined in
this Item have the same meaning given to them in the Form 10-K.
With respect to the In re MAXXAM Inc./Federated Shareholders
Litigation described under "MAXXAM Inc. Litigation--Rancho Mirage
Litigation," on April 4, 1997, the Court issued its opinion concerning the
merits of the case. The Court found, among other things, that Federated
and the director defendants, respectively, caused and allowed the Company
and MCOP to agree to terms in the Mirada transaction which were unfair to
the Company and MCOP. The Court mentioned various theories of damages
which had been presented at the trial (ranging from $3.6 million to $49.4
million, which would be payable to the Company). However, the Court
deferred a decision on damages, stating that it would reconsider rescission
as a possible remedy and might await any appeal of its decision.
With respect to CID No. 11356 described under "Kaiser Litigation-
- -DOJ Proceedings," Kaiser was informed in April 1997 that the DOJ has
officially closed its investigation and will return the documents submitted
by KACC.
With respect to the Matheson action described under "Kaiser
Litigation--Other Proceedings--Matheson, et al. v. Kaiser Aluminum
Corporation, et al.," on March 27, 1997, the Court of Chancery signed a
final order awarding $800,000 of fees and expenses to plaintiffs,
dissolving the preliminary injunction, and dismissing plaintiffs' case with
prejudice.
With respect to the Marbled Murrelet action described under
"Pacific Lumber Litigation," on April 18, 1997, the U.S. Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision which had
preliminarily enjoined eight already-approved THPs to the extent they rely
on the Federal Owl Plan. Pacific Lumber had previously obtained regulatory
reapproval of seven of the eight THPs and confirmed with the trial court
that six of those THPs were no longer subject to the preliminary
injunction. This favorable ruling vacating the trial court's preliminary
injunction disposes of the remainder of this case.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A) EXHIBITS:
11 Computation of Net Income Per Common and
Common Equivalent Share
27 Financial Data Schedule
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:
On March 12, 1997, the Company filed a Current Report
on Form 8-K (under Item 5), dated March 11, 1997, concerning an agreement
to amend the Headwaters Agreement to extend the period of time during which
the closing conditions must be met to February 17, 1998.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, who has signed this report on
behalf of the Registrant and as the principal accounting officer of the
Registrant.
MAXXAM INC.
Date: April 21, 1997 By: /S/ PAUL N. SCHWARTZ
Paul N. Schwartz
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11
MAXXAM INC.
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME
PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
March 31,
---------------------------
1997 1996
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares outstanding during each period 9,326,330 9,376,703
Common equivalent shares attributable to stock
options and convertible securities 101,780 98,369
------------- -------------
Total common and common equivalent shares 9,428,110 9,475,072
============= =============
Net income $ .7 $ 5.8
============= =============
Net income per common and common equivalent
share $ .07 $ .61
============= =============
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE> 1
<CASH> 193,700
<SECURITIES> 52,400
<RECEIVABLES> 248,400
<ALLOWANCES> 5,200
<INVENTORY> 640,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 1,377,600
<PP&E> 2,092,500
<DEPRECIATION> 794,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 4,029,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 623,900
<BONDS> 1,944,000
0
300
<COMMON> 5,000
<OTHER-SE> (56,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 4,029,400
<SALES> 631,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 631,600
<CGS> 508,700
<TOTAL-COSTS> 508,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 73,900
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 53,100
<INCOME-PRETAX> 6,800
<INCOME-TAX> 2,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 700
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 700
<EPS-PRIMARY> .07
<EPS-DILUTED> .07
</TABLE>
