MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO
10-Q/A, 1999-03-31
ABRASIVE, ASBESTOS & MISC NONMETALLIC MINERAL PRODS
Previous: MILLS MUSIC TRUST, 10-K, 1999-03-31
Next: MOBIL CORP, 10-K, 1999-03-31




The Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 1998, filed on November 6, 1998, via EDGAR
has been amended (Form 10-Q/A).  The inventory portion of the
restructuring charge ($29 million) has been reclassified in the
Consolidated Statement of Income and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
to be consistent with the presentation in the year-end 1998 Form 10-K.

In the Consolidated Statement of Income, the inventory portion of the
restructuring charge has been classified as a component of cost of goods
sold.  This change did not impact reported operating income.  In the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows this charge has now been included
as part of "Asset impairment charges", instead of as part of "Working
capital and other changes - net".  This change did not impact net cash
provided by operating activities.  Related discussion in the
"Restructuring Charge" note and in "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" has been updated.  The
financial data schedule has been updated to reflect the change in cost
of goods sold and the remaining restructuring charge has been included
in other expenses. 

<PAGE>  1             
                             

                          UNITED STATES
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                    Washington, D.C. 20549



                          FORM 10-Q/A

       QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
           OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For Quarter ended September 30, 1998     
                             Commission file number: 1-3285


          MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY


State of Incorporation: Delaware
               I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 41-0417775

   Executive offices: 3M Center, St. Paul, Minnesota 55144

              Telephone number: (651) 733-1110



    Indicate  by check mark whether the Registrant  (1)  has
filed  all  reports required to be filed by  Section  13  or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934  during  the
preceding  12  months (or for such shorter period  that  the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and  (2)  has
been  subject to such filing requirements for  the  past  90
days.  Yes   X  .  No      .



On September 30, 1998, there were 401,345,869 shares of the
Registrant's common stock outstanding.



               This document contains 31 pages.
           The exhibit index is set forth on page 28.



<PAGE>  2                                

<TABLE>

       Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries

                     PART I.  Financial Information

                    Consolidated Statement of Income
             (Amounts in millions, except per-share amounts)
                              (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                               Three months ended     Nine months ended
                                   September 30          September 30
                                1998       1997        1998        1997
<S>                            <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
Net sales                      $3,766     $3,826     $11,236     $11,357

Operating expenses
  Cost of goods sold            2,190      2,173       6,448       6,418
  Restructuring charge-
    inventory                      29         --          29          --
      Total cost of goods sold  2,219      2,173       6,477       6,418
  Selling, general and
    administrative expenses       947        952       2,838       2,861
  Restructuring charge - other    303         --         303          --
         Total                  3,469      3,125       9,618       9,279

Operating income                  297        701       1,618       2,078

Other income and expense
  Interest expense                 37         23         106          74
  Investment and other
    income - net                  (11)       (13)        (33)        (44)
  Gain on divestiture - net       (10)      (803)        (10)       (803)
         Total                     16       (793)         63        (773)

Income before income taxes
  and minority interest           281      1,494       1,555       2,851

Provision for income taxes         96        549         552       1,035

Minority interest                   7         18          39          61

Net income                     $  178     $  927      $  964      $1,755

Weighted average common
  shares outstanding            402.7      412.5       403.7       414.7
Earnings per share - basic     $ 0.44     $ 2.25      $ 2.39      $ 4.23

Weighted average common
  and common equivalent
  shares outstanding            406.7      419.2       408.7       420.9
Earnings per share - diluted   $ 0.44     $ 2.21       $2.36       $4.17

<FN>
<F1>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of this statement.
</FN>
</TABLE>

<PAGE>  3

<TABLE>

          Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries

                          Consolidated Balance Sheet
                             (Dollars in millions)
<CAPTION>
                                             September 30,
                                                 1998         December 31,
                                              (Unaudited)         1997
<S>                                           <C>             <C>                                     
Assets
Current assets        
   Cash and cash equivalents                       $   204         $   230
   Other securities                                    177             247
   Accounts receivable - net                         2,664           2,434
   Inventories
      Finished goods                                 1,324           1,293
      Work in process                                  636             605
      Raw materials and supplies                       468             501
         Total inventories                           2,428           2,399

   Other current assets                              1,017             858
            Total current assets                     6,490           6,168

Investments                                            623             613

Property, plant and equipment                       12,995          12,098
   Less accumulated depreciation                    (7,684)         (7,064)
      Property, plant and equipment - net            5,311           5,034

Other assets                                         1,541           1,423
            Total                                  $13,965         $13,238

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
   Accounts payable                                $   878         $   898
   Payroll                                             466             306
   Income taxes                                        261             238
   Short-term debt                                   1,696           1,499
   Other current liabilities                         1,199           1,042
            Total current liabilities                4,500           3,983

Other liabilities                                    2,155           2,314
Long-term debt                                       1,426           1,015
Stockholders' equity - net                           5,884           5,926
   Shares outstanding
       September 30, 1998, 401,345,869
       December 31, 1997,  404,724,947
                                                   ________        ________
            Total                                  $13,965         $13,238

<FN>
<F1>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of this statement.
</FN>
</TABLE>

<PAGE>  4

<TABLE>

    Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries

     Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
    (Dollars and shares in millions, except per-share amounts)
                           (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                                           Three months ended  Nine months ended
                                                 September 30       September 30
                                                1998     1997      1998    1997
<S>                                          <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>
Common stock and capital in excess of        
   par value at beginning and end of period  $   296  $   296   $   296  $  296

Retained earnings
  Balance at beginning of period              10,081    9,061     9,848   8,756
  Net income (A)                                 178      927       964   1,755
  Dividends paid (per share:
    $0.55, $0.53, $1.65, $1.59)                 (221)    (220)     (666)   (661)
  Stock option plans and other                   (13)     (24)     (121)   (106)
Balance at end of period                      10,025    9,744    10,025   9,744

Accumulated other comprehensive income - net
  Balance at beginning of period
    Cumulative foreign currency translation
       adjustments                              (624)    (302)     (547)   (178)
    Unrealized gain on securities - net            8        5         8      15
  Other comprehensive income
    Foreign currency translation and other
      adjustments - net (B)                       71      (92)       (6)   (216)
    Unrealized gain (loss) on
      securities - net (C)                        (3)       2        (3)     (8)
  Balance at end of period
    Cumulative foreign currency translation
      adjustments                               (553)    (394)     (553)   (394)
    Unrealized gain on securities - net            5        7         5       7
Balance at end of period                        (548)    (387)     (548)   (387)

Unearned compensation - ESOP
  Balance at beginning of period                (360)    (396)     (379)   (412)
  Amortization                                    10        8        29      24
Balance at end of period                        (350)    (388)     (350)   (388)

Treasury stock, at cost
  Balance at beginning of period
    (shares:  68.1, 56.5, 67.3, 55.2)         (3,357)  (2,315)   (3,300) (2,193)
  Reacquired stock
    (shares:  3.1, 7.9, 7.3, 13.6)              (229)    (728)     (606) (1,229)
  Issuances pursuant to stock option plans
    (shares:  0.5, 1.1, 3.9, 5.5)                 47      102       367     481
Balance at end of period                      (3,539)  (2,941)   (3,539) (2,941)
    (shares: 70.7, 63.3, 70.7, 63.3)

Stockholders' equity - net                   $ 5,884  $ 6,324  $  5,884 $ 6,324

Total comprehensive income (A + B + C)       $   246  $   837   $   955 $ 1,531

<FN>
<F1>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an
integral part of this statement.
</FN>
</TABLE>

<PAGE>  5

<TABLE>

         Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries

                     Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
                            (Dollars in millions)
                                 (Unaudited)

<CAPTION>
                                                      Nine months ended
                                                         September 30
                                                        1998       1997

<S>                                                   <C>        <C>       
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income                                            $  964     $1,755

Adjustments to reconcile net income
    to net cash provided by operating activities
  Depreciation and amortization                          644        654
  Asset impairment charges                               190         --
  Gain on divestiture - net                              (10)      (803)
  Income tax payable relating to divestiture               4        308
  Implant litigation - net                              (209)       130
  Working capital and other changes - net                (85)      (386)
Net cash provided by continuing operations             1,498      1,658
Net cash used by discontinued operations                 --         (92)
Net cash provided by operating activities              1,498      1,566

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures                                  (1,056)    (1,002)
Proceeds from National Advertising Company divestiture    --      1,000
Other changes - net                                      (68)        37
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities      (1,124)        35

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Change in short-term debt - net                          145        (90)
Repayment of long-term debt                              (52)      (546)
Proceeds from long-term debt                             556        334
Purchases of treasury stock                             (606)    (1,229)
Reissuances of treasury stock                            245        294
Payment of dividends                                    (666)      (661)
Other                                                    (19)       (22)
Net cash used in financing activities                   (397)    (1,920)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash                   (3)        42

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                (26)      (277)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year           230        583
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period            $  204     $  306

<FN>
<F1>
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of this statement.
</FN>
</TABLE>

<PAGE>  6

        Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries
                 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                                (Unaudited)

The interim financial statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of  financial position, results of operations and cash flows for  the
periods  presented.  These adjustments consist of  normal,  recurring
items,  except  for the restructuring charge recorded  in  the  third
quarter  of  1998.  The results of operations for any interim  period
are  not  necessarily indicative of results for the full  year.   The
condensed  consolidated financial statements and notes are  presented
as  permitted  by the requirements for Form 10-Q and do  not  contain
certain  information  included in the company's  annual  consolidated
financial  statements and notes.  This Form 10-Q should  be  read  in
conjunction with the company's consolidated financial statements  and
notes included in its 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Restructuring Charge:
3M is rationalizing product lines that have marginal returns and/or a
decreasing    strategic   fit;   consolidating   some   manufacturing
operations;  and identifying and eliminating lower-value  activities.
As  a  result  of  these initiatives, by the end of  1999,  including
personnel reductions in the second half of 1998, the company  expects
a total reduction of 4,500 employees.

In the third quarter of 1998, in connection with this plan to improve
productivity  and reduce costs, the company recorded a  restructuring
charge of $332 million ($214 million after-tax).  Major components of
this  estimated charge include $161 million related to the write-down
of  certain assets to net realizable value, $102 million of  employee
severance  and related costs, $40 million relating to  losses  on
business   dispositions  and  other  costs, and $29 million relating
to inventory write-downs.   These  components  are reflected  on  the
consolidated balance  sheet  as  a  reduction in property,  plant and
equipment - net, and as accruals in payroll, other current liabilities,
and inventory, respectively.  The inventory write-down of $29 million,
which has been classified as a component of cost of goods sold, is for
certain product lines that are being discontinued.  As of September 30,
1998, only  minimal payments had been made relating to the restructuring
charge.

The severance and related costs component of the restructuring charge
does  not  represent all of the amounts to be recorded in  connection
with  the separation of the employees referred to above.  The company
expects  additional charges relating to productivity  improvement  as
the  assessment  of  the  employees  impacted  and  communication  of
severance benefits to affected employees is finalized.  Restructuring
charges,  including the third quarter 1998 charge,  are  expected  to
total about $500 million.


<PAGE>  7

Derivatives and Hedging Activities:
In  June  1998,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting  for
Derivative  Instruments and Hedging Activities."   The  company  must
adopt  this  standard no later than January 1, 2000.  The company  is
reviewing  the  requirements  of  this  standard,   which  are  quite
complex.  Although  the company expects that this standard  will  not
materially  affect its financial position and results of  operations,
it  has  not  yet  determined the impact  of  this  standard  on  its
financial statements.

Debt issuances:
In  October  1998, a Japanese subsidiary of the company, Sumitomo  3M
Limited,  completed  a  5-year,  10 billion  yen  (approximately  $85
million), 0.795 percent fixed rate private placement note.

In  July  1998,  a German subsidiary of the company,  3M  Deutschland
GmbH,  completed  a  3-year,  $200  million,  5.75  percent  Eurobond
offering.  After giving effect to an interest rate swap, the  company
will have an interest obligation based on a floating LIBOR index.

Comprehensive income:
Effective January 1, 1998, the company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting  Standards  No.  130,  "Reporting  Comprehensive  Income."
Total  comprehensive income and the components of  accumulated  other
comprehensive income are presented in the Consolidated  Statement  of
Changes in Stockholders' Equity.

Earnings per share:
The  difference  in  the  weighted  average  shares  outstanding  for
calculating  basic and diluted earnings per share is attributable  to
the  assumed exercise of the Management Stock Ownership Program stock
options  for  the three-month and nine-month periods ended  September
30, 1998 and 1997.  Effective July 1997, all General Employees' Stock
Purchase Plan options are exercised on the last business day of  each
month of grant, resulting in no dilutive effect.

Other:
Discussion  of legal matters is cross-referenced to this  Form  10-Q,
Part  II,  Item  1,  Legal Proceedings, and should be  considered  an
integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the company's independent auditors,  have
performed  a  review  of the unaudited interim  financial  statements
included  herein  and  their review report thereon  accompanies  this
filing.


<PAGE>  8

               Review Report of Independent Auditors


To the Stockholders of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company:

We  have  reviewed  the  accompanying condensed consolidated  balance
sheet  of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries
as  of  September  30,  1998, and the related condensed  consolidated
statements  of  income and changes in stockholders'  equity  for  the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997,
and  cash  flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30,  1998
and  1997.  These financial statements are the responsibility of  the
Company's management.

We  conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review  of
interim   financial  information  consists  principally  of  applying
analytical  procedures  to financial data  and  making  inquiries  of
persons  responsible  for financial and accounting  matters.   It  is
substantially  less  in scope than an audit conducted  in  accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based  on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications
that   should  be  made  to  the  condensed  consolidated   financial
statements  referred  to  above for them to  be  in  conformity  with
generally accepted accounting principles.

We  have  previously  audited, in accordance with generally  accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
1997,  and the related consolidated statements of income, changes  in
stockholders'  equity  and cash flows for the year  then  ended  (not
presented  herein); and in our report dated February 9, 1998,  except
for  the  last  paragraph  under Debt in the  Notes  to  Consolidated
Financial Statements, as to which the date is February 18,  1998,  we
expressed  an  unqualified  opinion on those  consolidated  financial
statements.  In  our  opinion,  the  information  set  forth  in  the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December  31,
1997,  is fairly stated in all material respects in relation  to  the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


                               /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



St. Paul, Minnesota
October 22, 1998

<PAGE>  9

       Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries

                 Management's Discussion and Analysis of
              Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Third Quarter
Worldwide  sales for the third quarter totaled $3.766  billion,  down
1.6  percent from the third quarter last year.  Excluding changes  in
currency  exchange  rates,  sales rose about  2  percent.   Worldwide
volume and selling prices were both up about 1 percent.

In  the  United  States, sales decreased about 1  percent  to  $1.892
billion.   Adjusting for the third-quarter 1997 sale of  the  outdoor
advertising business, sales rose about 1 percent.  A number  of  U.S.
businesses  posted good growth, with gains in consumer,  office,  and
safety  and security businesses.  The company experienced soft demand
in  businesses  serving  the electronics, transportation  safety  and
industrial  markets.  In electronics, U.S. sales of  several  product
lines  --  including  connectors, chip transport  media,  performance
chemicals, and bonding systems -- were impacted by industry weakness,
as   well   as  by  shifts  in  customer  production  to  Asia.    In
transportation  safety,  the enactment of  the  new  federal  highway
funding  law  has  not  yet  translated  into  increased  demand  for
reflective sheetings.  3M expects benefits from this new funding  act
to  begin  in 1999.  In industrial markets, abrasive, tape and  other
industrial  businesses  have  been negatively  affected  by  industry
slowdowns.

Internationally,  sales  totaled  $1.874  billion.   Overall,  local-
currency sales gains of about 5 percent, driven about equally between
volume  and  selling  prices,  were  more  than  offset  by  currency
translation.   Expressed in dollars, international sales  declined  2
percent.    The  company  increased  selling  prices  in  all   major
geographic areas, helping to offset part of the currency devaluation.
Currency  translation reduced international sales by about 7 percent.
In  Europe, volume increased about 3 percent.  Good volume gains were
posted in Germany, Spain and in the Nordic region, but volume was  up
only 2 percent in France and was flat in the U.K.  In Eastern Europe,
where  3M  has traditionally posted volume gains of about 20 percent,
unit  sales rose about 2 percent, impacted by the spillover from  the
Russian  economic instability.  In the Asia Pacific area, volume  was
flat.   In  Japan, despite the continuing recession, volume increased
about  5  percent.   In Asia outside Japan, volume declined  about  7
percent.   3M  posted  solid gains in Singapore and  China,  but  was
negatively  affected  by the economic turmoil in  Korea,  Hong  Kong,
Thailand and Malaysia.  In Latin America, volume increased 3 percent,
due  to  economic  slowing brought about by  the  Asian  and  Russian
instability.   In  Brazil  and Argentina  volume  was  flat  for  the
quarter. In Mexico, unit sales increased about 5 percent.  In Canada,
volume increased about 11 percent.


<PAGE> 10

The cost of goods sold discussion that follows excludes the inventory
portion of the restructuring charge.

Cost  of  goods  sold,  which  includes manufacturing,  research  and
development,  and  engineering, was 58.1 percent  of  sales,  up  1.3
percentage  points from the third quarter last year.   Gross  margins
benefited  from  higher selling prices and lower raw material  costs.
However, the effects of currency exchange rates and low volume growth
more  than offset these benefits.  Currency reduced gross margins  by
seven-tenths of a percentage point.  The currency effect  relates  to
the  impact of currency fluctuations on the transfer of goods between
3M operations in the United States and abroad.

Selling,  general  and administrative spending was  25.2  percent  of
sales,  up slightly as a percent of sales from the same quarter  last
year, but down $5 million.

During  the  third quarter, 3M recorded a $332 million ($214  million
after-tax) restructuring charge.  Details of the restructuring charge
are discussed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The   operating   income   discussion  that  follows   excludes   the
restructuring charge.  Worldwide operating income was 16.7 percent of
sales,  down 1.6 percentage points from the third quarter last  year.
Margins were down nearly 3 percentage points in the United States and
four-tenths  of a point internationally.  Operating income  was  $629
million,  down 10.3 percent from the year-earlier quarter.   Currency
reduced operating income by about $55 million, or 8 percent.

Third quarter interest expense of $37 million was up $14 million from
the  same  quarter last year, reflecting a moderate increase  in  the
company's  financial leverage.  Net investment and other  income  was
$11 million, in line with the level averaged in each of the past four
quarters.   The  third  quarter  of  1998  reflects  a  $10   million
adjustment  to  finalize the accounting for the 1997  divestiture  of
National Advertising Company.

The  impact  of the 1998 restructuring charge and the  1997  gain  on
divestiture  on 3M's income statement and tax rate is  summarized  in
the following table.

<PAGE> 11

<TABLE>

Supplemental Consolidated Statement of Income Information (Unaudited)
(Millions, except per-share amounts)
Three months ended
<CAPTION>
                      September 30, 1998              September 30, 1997
                  Excluding
                   Restruc-  Restruc-             Excluding   Gain on
                     turing    turing  Reported      Dives-    Dives-  Reported
                     Charge    Charge     Total      titure    titure     Total
<S>                 <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>
Operating income    $  629    $ (332)   $   297    $    701   $   --    $   701
Other income and
  expense               16        --         16          10      (803)     (793)
Income before income
 taxes and minority
 interest           $  613    $ (332)   $   281     $   691    $  803   $ 1,494
Provision for income
 taxes                 214      (118)        96         241       308       549
Effective tax rate    35.0%     35.5%      34.3%       35.0%     38.4%     36.8%
Minority interest        7        --          7          18        --        18
Net income          $  392    $ (214)   $   178     $   432    $  495   $   927
Earnings per
 share - diluted    $ 0.97    $(0.53)   $  0.44     $  1.03    $ 1.18   $  2.21

</TABLE>
 
Excluding  the  1998  restructuring  charge  and  the  1997  gain  on
divestiture, the worldwide effective income tax rate for the  quarter
was  35.0  percent, the same as in the third quarter last year.   The
1998  restructuring charge was taxed at a rate of 35.5 percent.   The
1997  gain on divestiture was taxed fully in the United States  at  a
rate  of 38.4 percent (federal statutory rate of 35.0 percent  and  a
net  effective  state tax rate of 3.4 percent).  This  results  in  a
total  3M  combined effective tax rate of 34.3 percent for the  third
quarter, compared to 36.8 percent in the third quarter last year.

Net income totaled $178 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, compared
with  $927 million, or $2.21 per diluted share, in the third  quarter
of  1997.  Excluding the 1998 restructuring charge and the 1997  gain
on divestiture, net income totaled $392 million, or $0.97 per diluted
share, compared with $432 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, in the
third  quarter  of 1997.  The company estimates that changes  in  the
value  of the U.S. dollar decreased earnings for the quarter by about
8  cents  per  share compared with the third quarter of  1997.   This
estimate  includes  the  effect  of translating  profits  from  local
currencies into U.S. dollars; the impact of currency fluctuations  on
the  transfer of goods between 3M operations in the United States and
abroad; and transaction gains and losses.

Year-to-date
On  a  year-to-date basis, worldwide sales totaled  $11.236  billion,
down  about  1  percent  from the same period last  year.   Excluding
changes in currency exchange rates, sales rose about 3 percent.  Unit
sales increased about 2 percent, while selling prices were up about 1
percent.


<PAGE> 12

In  the  United  States, sales decreased slightly to $5.457  billion.
Adjusting  for the third-quarter 1997 sale of the outdoor advertising
business, sales rose about 2 percent.  Internationally, sales totaled
$5.779  billion, with local-currency sales gains more than offset  by
currency  translation.   Expressed in  dollars,  international  sales
declined  2  percent.  Volume increased about 5 percent  and  selling
prices were up 2 percent.  Currency translation reduced international
sales by about 9 percent.

The cost of goods sold discussion that follows excludes the inventory
portion of the restructuring charge.

Cost  of  goods  sold,  which  includes manufacturing,  research  and
development,  and engineering, was 57.3 percent of sales,  up  eight-
tenths of a  percentage  point  from the same period last year.   The
factors that influenced gross margins for the third quarter were  the
same factors that affected the year-to-date results.

Selling,  general  and administrative spending was  25.3  percent  of
sales,  up  slightly as a percent of sales from the same period  last
year, but down $23 million.

The   operating   income   discussion  that  follows   excludes   the
restructuring charge.  Worldwide operating income was 17.4 percent of
sales,  down  nine-tenths of a percentage point from the same  period
last  year.   Margins were down 1.7 percentage points in  the  United
States  and  down  slightly internationally.   Operating  income  was
$1.950  billion,  down  6.2  percent from  the  year-earlier  period.
Currency  reduced  operating income by  about  $200  million,  or  10
percent.

Interest  expense of $106 million was up $32 million from  the  first
nine  months of last year, reflecting the company's strategy to lower
its  cost of capital by moderately increasing its financial leverage.
This strategy may increase interest expense by about $50 million  for
total  year  1998  when compared to 1997.  Net investment  and  other
income was $33 million, in line with recent trends.

The  impact  of the 1998 restructuring charge and the  1997  gain  on
divestiture  on 3M's income statement is summarized in the  following
table.

<PAGE> 13

<TABLE>

Supplemental Consolidated Statement of Income Information (Unaudited)
(Millions, except per-share amounts)
Nine months ended

<CAPTION>
                      September 30, 1998             September 30, 1997
                  Excluding
                   Restruc-  Restruc-             Excluding   Gain on
                     turing    turing  Reported      Dives-    Dives-  Reported
                     Charge    Charge     Total      titure    titure     Total
<S>                  <C>      <C>       <C>        <C>         <C>      <C>
Operating income     $1,950   $ (332)   $ 1,618    $  2,078    $   --   $ 2,078
Other income and
 expense                 63       --         63          30      (803)     (773)
Income before income
 taxes and minority
 interest            $1,887   $ (332)   $ 1,555     $ 2,048    $  803   $ 2,851
Provision for income
 taxes                  670     (118)       552         727       308     1,035
Effective tax rate     35.5%    35.5%      35.5%       35.5%     38.4%     36.3%
Minority interest        39       --         39          61        --        61
Net income           $1,178   $ (214)   $   964     $ 1,260    $  495   $ 1,755
Earnings per
 share - diluted     $ 2.88   $(0.52)   $  2.36     $  2.99    $ 1.18   $  4.17

</TABLE>

The worldwide effective income tax rate for the first nine months was
35.5  percent,  the  same  as the tax rate  (excluding  the  gain  on
divestiture) in the same period last year.

Net income totaled $964 million, or $2.36 per diluted share, compared
with  $1.755 billion, or $4.17 per diluted share, in the  first  nine
months of 1997.  Excluding the 1998 restructuring charge and the 1997
gain on divestiture, net income totaled $1.178 billion, or $2.88  per
diluted  share,  compared with $1.260 billion, or $2.99  per  diluted
share, in the first nine months of 1997.  The company estimates  that
changes  in the value of the U.S. dollar decreased earnings  for  the
first nine months by about 29 cents per share compared with the  same
period  in  1997.  This estimate includes the effect  of  translating
profits  from  local  currencies into U.S.  dollars;  the  impact  of
currency  fluctuations on the transfer of goods between 3M operations
in the United States and abroad; and transaction gains and losses.

FUTURE OUTLOOK
3M  expects  higher  fourth-quarter 1998 sales and earnings  compared
with  the  same  quarter  last  year, excluding  the  impact  of  any
additional restructuring charges taken in the fourth quarter of 1998.
The  company expects to take additional restructuring charges related
to productivity improvement initiatives in the fourth quarter of 1998
and possibly into 1999, which would bring total restructuring charges
to  an  estimated  $500 million.  Currency, due  to  purchased  goods
effects, is expected to reduce earnings in the fourth quarter of 1998
by about 5 cents per share.

Results are expected to benefit from 3M's cost reduction efforts.  3M
has  an  8  percent  annual  productivity improvement  objective,  as
measured  by sales growth per employee in local currencies.   Due  to
the  turmoil  in  the  Asia  Pacific area  and  softness  in  certain
businesses in


<PAGE> 14

the  United  States, 1998 productivity will not meet  the  8  percent
target  for  the first time in 4 years.  During the third quarter  of
1998,  employment  declined about 1,600 people,  about  1,000  people
excluding summer temporary workers.  The company expects to reduce up
to  an additional 1,000 positions by the end of 1998.  By the end  of
1999, including personnel reductions in the second half of 1998,  the
company  expects a total reduction of 4,500 employees.  These actions
should help the company regain and sustain its 8 percent productivity-
improvement target.

The  company is monitoring worldwide business conditions closely  and
will  adjusts prices, costs and investments as appropriate.  Overall,
the company has experienced earnings declines of about 20 percent  in
the Asia Pacific area for the first nine months of 1998.  The company
does  not expect a significant change in this situation in the fourth
quarter  of 1998.  3M expects that the Latin American economies  will
continue  to  decelerate.  3M is also cautious  about  the  near-term
outlook for the U.S. and European economies.  Given this scenario, 3M
expects modest sales growth in the fourth quarter when compared  with
the same quarter last year.

For  total year 1998, the company expects to buy back about 9 million
shares of 3M stock.  This is expected to result in shares outstanding
at  year-end 1998, net of issuances, of about one percent  less  when
comparing to year-end 1997 balances.

IMPACT OF THE YEAR 2000 ISSUE
The  Year 2000 issue is the result of using only the last two  digits
to  indicate the year in computer hardware and software programs  and
embedded  technology such as micro-controllers. As  a  result,  these
programs  do  not  properly recognize a year that  begins  with  "20"
instead of the familiar "19."  If uncorrected, such programs will  be
unable  to  interpret dates beyond the year 1999, which  could  cause
computer system failure or other errors disrupting operations.

The  company recognizes the importance of the Year 2000 issue and has
given  it  high  priority.  In November 1996, the company  created  a
corporate-wide  Year  2000  project  team  representing  all  company
business  and  staff units.  The team's objective  is  to  ensure  an
uninterrupted transition to the year 2000 by assessing,  testing  and
modifying products and IT and non-IT systems (defined below) so  that
they will perform as intended, regardless of the date (before, during
and  after  December 31, 1999), and dates (before, during  and  after
December  31, 1999 and including February 29, 2000) can be  processed
with  expected results ("Year 2000 Compliant"). The scope of the Year
2000  compliance  effort includes (i) information  technology  ("IT")
such  as  software  and  hardware; (ii) non-IT  systems  or  embedded
technology   such   as   micro-controllers   contained   in   various
manufacturing  and lab equipment, environmental and  safety  systems,
facilities  and utilities, and date-sensitive company  products;  and
(iii)  the  readiness of key third parties, including  suppliers  and
customers, and the electronic data interchange (EDI) with  those  key
third parties.


<PAGE> 15

The Year 2000 project team has taken inventory of products and IT and
non-IT  systems or components that might malfunction or fail  at  the
end  of  the  millennium.   The project teams  then  categorized  the
potential  date  component  failures into three  categories:  "Vital"
(stops   the  business  operation  and  no  short-term  solution   is
available); "Critical" (inconvenient to the business operation and  a
short-term solution is available); and "Marginal" (inconsequential to
the business operation).

IT  Systems  -  The  company  is using  both  internal  and  external
resources  to  remediate and test millions of  lines  of  application
software  code. As of September 30, 1998, approximately  95%  of  the
core IT systems (e.g., general ledger, payroll, procurement and order
management) located in the United States that are deemed "Vital"  and
"Critical"  are Year 2000 Compliant.  As of September 30, 1998,
approximately  75%  of  the  IT systems in subsidiaries  outside  the
United  States that are deemed "Vital" and "Critical" are  Year  2000
Compliant.  

Non-IT  Systems  -  The  company has over 100 manufacturing  and  lab
locations worldwide with varying degrees of non-IT systems  (such  as
programmable  logic  controllers,  gauging  guidance  and  adjustment
systems  and  testing equipment). Assessment and  testing  of  non-IT
systems for Year 2000 compliance has proven much more difficult  than
assessing  compliance  of IT systems. Compliance  testing  of  non-IT
systems  often requires shutdown of the manufacturing operations.  To
minimize  these disruptions, the company has contacted the  suppliers
of  non-IT  systems  used  in the company's facilities  and  obtained
statements on whether the system is Year 2000 Compliant.  The company
has  relied on such vendor statements and tested components of non-IT
systems   where   the   testing  does  not  interrupt   manufacturing
operations. As of September 30, 1998, approximately  75%  of  the
non-IT  systems located in the United States that are deemed  "Vital"
and  "Critical"  and  approximately 65%  of  the  non-IT  systems  in
subsidiaries  outside the United States that are deemed  "Vital"  and
"Critical" are believed to be Year 2000 Compliant.

Third  Parties  -  In addition to internal Year 2000  IT  and  non-IT
remediation activities, the company is in contact with key  suppliers
and  electronic  commerce customers to minimize  disruptions  in  the
relationship  between the company and these important  third  parties
from  the  Year  2000  issue.  While  the  company  cannot  guarantee
compliance  by  third  parties, the company will  consider  alternate
sources of supply in the event a key supplier cannot demonstrate  its
systems or products are Year 2000 Compliant.

Contingency  Planning - The primary focus of the  Year  2000  project
teams has been directed at making the company's IT and non-IT systems 
and products Year 2000 Compliant. The company is working on contingency
plans specifying what the company will do if failures occur in its IT
and  non-IT  systems or important third parties  are  not 


<PAGE> 16 

Year 2000 Compliant.  The  company  expects  to have such contingency
plans finalized by March 31, 1999 for its IT and non-IT systems and 
by April 30, 1999 for its key suppliers.

Company  Products - The vast majority of the company's  products  are
not  date-sensitive. The company has collected information on current
and  discontinued  date-sensitive  products.   This  information   is
available to customers as of the date of this filing.

Costs - Through September 30, 1998, the company had expensed incremental
costs  of  $41  million related to the Year 2000  issue.   The  total
remaining incremental cost is estimated to be approximately $34 million.
The company is expensing as incurred all costs related to the assessment
and remediation of the Year 2000 issue.  These costs are being funded
through operating cash flows.  The company's total cost for the  Year
2000   issue  includes  estimated  costs  and  time  associated  with
interfacing  with third parties' Year 2000 issues.   These  estimates
are based on currently available information.

The  company's  current estimates of the amount  of  time  and  costs
necessary to remediate and test its computer systems are based on the
facts  and  circumstances existing at this time.  The estimates  were
made  using  assumptions  of future events  including  the  continued
availability  of  certain  resources, Year 2000  modification  plans,
implementation success by key third-parties, and other factors.   New
developments  may occur that could affect the company's estimates  of
the amount of time and costs needed to modify and test its IT and non-
IT systems for Year 2000 compliance.  These developments include, but
are  not  limited  to:  (i) the availability and  cost  of  personnel
trained  in  this  area; (ii) the ability to locate and  correct  all
relevant date-sensitive codes in both IT and non-IT systems; (iii)
unanticipated failures in its IT and non-IT systems; and (iv) the
planning and Year 2000 compliance success that key customers and
suppliers attain.

The company cannot determine the impact of these potential developments
on the current estimate of probable costs of making its products and IT
and non-IT systems Year 2000 Compliant.  Accordingly, the company is not
able to estimate its possible future costs beyond the current estimate
of costs.  As new developments occur, these cost estimates may be revised
to reflect the impact of these developments on the costs to the company
of making its products and IT and non-IT systems Year 2000 Compliant.
Such revisions in costs could have a material adverse impact on the 
company's net income in the quarterly period in which they are recorded.
Although the company considers it unlikely, such revisions could also
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or
annual results of operations of the company.

THE EURO CONVERSION
On  January  1, 1999, eleven of the fifteen member countries  of  the
European Union (EU) will establish fixed conversion rates through the
European  Central Bank (ECB) between their existing local  currencies
and  the  Euro,  the EU's future single currency.  The  participating


<PAGE> 17

countries  have  agreed  to  adopt the Euro  as  their  common  legal
currency  on  that  date.   The  Euro will  then  trade  on  currency
exchanges and be available for non-cash transactions.

Following introduction of the Euro, the local currencies will  remain
legal tender between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2002.  During the
transition  period, goods and services may be paid for  using  either
the  Euro  or  the local currency under the EU's "no  compulsion,  no
prohibition" principle.  If cross-border payments are made in a local
currency  during  this transition period, the amount  will  first  be
converted  into the Euro and then converted from the  Euro  into  the
second  local  currency at the rates fixed by the ECB.  Beginning  no
later  than  January 1, 2002, the participating countries will  issue
new  Euro-denominated bills and coins for use in  cash  transactions.
By  no  later  than  July 1, 2002, the participating  countries  will
withdraw all bills and coins denominated in local currencies,  making
conversion to the Euro complete.

In February 1997, the company created a European Monetary Union (EMU)
Steering  Committee  and  project  teams  representing  all   company
business  and  staff  units in Europe.  The teams'  objective  is  to
ensure   a  smooth  transition  to  EMU  for  the  company  and   its
constituencies.   The  scope  of  the  teams'  efforts  includes  (i)
assessing  the  Euro's impact on the company's business  and  pricing
strategies  for customers and suppliers, and (ii) ensuring  that  the
company's business processes and information technology (IT)  systems
can  process  transactions in Euros and local currencies  during  the
transition  period and achieve the conversion of all  relevant  local
currency  data  to  the Euro by January 1, 2002 in the  participating
countries.

Europe  is a significant market for the company, contributing 24%  of
consolidated sales and 16% of consolidated operating income in  1997.
The  company believes that the Euro will, over time, create increased
price  competition for the company's products across  Europe  due  to
cross-border price transparency. The company also believes  that  the
adverse effects of increased price competition will be offset to some
extent  by  new business opportunities and efficiencies in what  will
become  the world's second largest economy. The company, however,  is
not  able  to  estimate the anticipated net long-term impact  of  the
introduction of the Euro on the company.

The  company  has consolidated its IT operations and made significant
investments  in its IT systems in Europe over the past few  years  in
anticipation of the EMU.  The company expects that these  investments
will enable the company to manage customer orders, invoices, payments
and  accounts in Euros and in local currencies according to  customer
needs  by  January 1, 1999. During the three-year transition  period,
the  company  anticipates  spending  approximately  $25  million   to
complete  the  conversion to the Euro. The company has not  developed
contingency  plans  at this time since the company  believes  its  IT
systems will be ready by January 1, 2002 for the Euro conversion.

The  introduction  of the Euro is not expected  to  have  a  material
impact  on the company's overall currency risk.  Although the company
engages  in  significant trade within the EU,  the  impact  today  of
changes in currency exchange rates on the trade within the EU has not


<PAGE> 18

been  material.   The  company anticipates  the  Euro  will  simplify
financial  issues related to cross-border trade in the EU and  reduce
the  transaction  costs and administrative time necessary  to  manage
this  trade  and related risks.  The company believes, however,  that
the savings will not be material to corporate results.

The  company does have derivatives outstanding beyond January 1, 1999
in  several  of the European local currencies.  Under  the  EU's  "no
compulsion,  no  prohibition" principle, the  outstanding  derivative
positions  will either mature as local currency contracts or  convert
to Euro contracts at no additional economic cost to the company.  The
company  believes  that systems used to monitor derivative  positions
can  be  appropriately  modified  for  these  changes.   The  company
believes  the impact of the introduction of the Euro on the company's
derivative positions will not be material.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe
harbor"  for  certain  forward-looking  statements.   This  Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-Q  contains  forward-looking  statements,  which
reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and
financial performance.

These  forward-looking statements are subject to  certain  risks  and
uncertainties,  including those identified below, which  could  cause
actual results to differ materially from historical results or  those
anticipated.   The  words  "aim," "believe," "expect,"  "anticipate,"
"intend," "estimate," "will," "should," "could" and other expressions
which  indicate  future  events and trends  identify  forward-looking
statements.

Actual   future  results  and  trends  may  differ  materially   from
historical  results or those anticipated depending on  a  variety  of
factors,  including, but not limited to:  foreign exchange rates  and
fluctuations  in  those  rates;  the  effects  of,  and  changes  in,
worldwide economic conditions; raw materials, including shortages and
increases in the costs of key raw materials; the impact of  the  Year
2000   issue;  and  legal  proceedings  (see  discussion   of   Legal
Proceedings in Part II, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q).

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
The company's financial condition and liquidity remain strong.

Working capital decreased $195 million to $1.990 billion at September
30,  1998, compared to $2.185 billion at year-end 1997.  The accounts
receivable average days' sales outstanding was 57 days, down slightly
from  year-end.   The company's key inventory index was  3.8  months,
unchanged  from year-end.  The company's current ratio was 1.4,  down
from 1.5 at year-end.

Total  debt  increased  $608 million from  year-end  1997  to  $3.122
billion.   In line with the company's strategy to lower its  cost  of
capital, total debt increased from an average of about $2 billion  in
1997 to $3.122 billion as of September 30, 1998.  As of September 30,
1998, total debt was 35 percent of total capital.


<PAGE> 19

The company's strong credit rating provides ready and ample access to
funds  in  global  capital  markets.  In February  1998,  the  parent
company issued $330 million of 30-year, 6.375 percent debentures.  In
July  1998, a German subsidiary of the company, 3M Deutschland  GmbH,
completed a 3-year, $200 million, 5.75 percent Eurobond offering.  In
October  1998,  a  Japanese subsidiary of the  company,  Sumitomo  3M
Limited,  completed  a  5-year,  10 billion  yen  (approximately  $85
million),  0.795  percent  fixed rate  private  placement  note.   At
September  30,  1998, the company had available short-term  lines  of
credit totaling about $600 million.

Net  cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations
totaled  $1.498  billion in the first nine months of the  year,  down
$160  million from the same period last year.  Net cash outflows from
mammary implant litigation were $339 million higher than in the  same
period last year.  Asset impairment charges of $190 million relate to
the third quarter 1998 restructuring and represent the write-down  of
certain assets to net realizable value ($161 million relating to prop-
erty, plant and equipment and an inventory write-down of $29 million).
Working capital and other changes in  1998 includes the impact of the
employee  severance  and business disposition components of the
restructuring charges.

Timing differences between payment of implant liabilities and receipt
of related insurance recoveries could affect the cash flows of future
periods.  This is discussed in Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings, of
this Form 10-Q.

Net  cash  used by operating activities from discontinued  operations
was  $92 million in the first nine months of 1997.  Payments made  in
1997  were  primarily  severance  payments  related  to  discontinued
operations.

Cash  used  in investing activities was $1.124 billion in  the  first
nine months of the year, compared to cash provided of $35 million  in
the  same  period last year.  In 1997, cash proceeds related  to  the
sale  of  National  Advertising Company totaled $1 billion.   Capital
expenditures  for the first nine months of 1998 were $1.056  billion,
an increase of 5.5 percent compared with the same period last year.

Treasury  stock repurchases for the first nine months  of  1998  were
$606  million, compared with repurchases in the same period last year
of  $1.229 billion.  In the third quarter of 1997, net proceeds  from
the  National Advertising Company divestiture were primarily used  to
repurchase   shares  and  to  reduce  short-term   debt.    Financing
activities for both short-term and long-term debt provided  net  cash
inflows  of  $649  million, compared with net cash outflows  of  $302
million in the first nine months last year.

The  company repurchased about 7.3 million shares of common stock  in
the  first nine months of 1998, compared with 13.6 million shares  in
the  same period last year.  In November 1997, the Board of Directors
authorized  the repurchase of up to 25 million shares  of  3M  common
stock  through  December 31, 1998.  As of September  30,  1998,  15.3
million shares remained authorized for repurchase.  Stock repurchases
are  made  to  support employee stock purchase plans  and  for  other
corporate purposes.


<PAGE> 20

Cash dividends paid to shareholders totaled $666 million in the first
nine  months  of this year, compared with $661 million  in  the  same
period  last  year.   In  February 1998, the quarterly  dividend  was
increased to 55 cents a share.

Legal  proceedings are discussed in the Legal Proceedings section  in
Part  II, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q.  There can be no certainty  that
the   company   may  not  ultimately  incur  charges,   whether   for
governmental  proceedings  and  claims,  products  liability  claims,
environmental  proceedings or other actions, in excess  of  presently
established  accruals.   While  such  future  charges  could  have  a
material  adverse  impact  on   the  company's  net  income  in   the
quarterly   period  in which they are recorded, the company  believes
that  such  additional charges, if any, would  not  have  a  material
adverse  effect  on  the consolidated financial  position  or  annual
results  of operations of the company. (NOTE: The preceding  sentence
applies  to  all legal proceedings involving the company  except  the
breast   implant  litigation.   See  discussion  of  breast   implant
litigation in Legal Proceedings, Part II, Item 1.)

The company expects to complete the refinancing of its Employee Stock
Ownership Plan in late 1998 or early 1999, which would result  in  an
estimated  $40 million after tax charge (estimated $0.10 per  diluted
share).  This would be reported as an extraordinary loss  from  early
extinguishment of debt.


<PAGE> 21


      Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries
                      PART II.  Other Information

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

The  company and certain of its subsidiaries are named as defendants
in  a  number  of  actions,  governmental  proceedings  and  claims,
including  environmental proceedings and products  liability  claims
involving  products now or formerly manufactured  and  sold  by  the
company.   In some actions, the claimants seek damages  as  well  as
other   relief,   which,  if  granted,  would  require   substantial
expenditures.  The  company has accrued certain  liabilities,  which
represent reasonable estimates of its probable liabilities for these
matters.  The company also has recorded receivables for the probable
amount of insurance recoverable with respect to these matters.

Some  of these matters raise difficult and complex factual and legal
issues,  and are subject to many uncertainties, including,  but  not
limited  to, the facts and circumstances of each particular  action,
the  jurisdiction and forum in which each action is  proceeding  and
differences  in  applicable law. Accordingly,  the  company  is  not
always   able  to  estimate  the  amount  of  its  possible   future
liabilities with respect to such matters.

There  can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur
charges,  whether for governmental proceedings and claims,  products
liability  claims,  environmental proceedings or other  actions,  in
excess of presently established accruals.  While such future charges
could have a material adverse impact on the company's net income  in
the  quarterly  period  in  which they  are  recorded,  the  company
believes  that  such additional charges, if any, would  not  have  a
material  adverse effect on the consolidated financial  position  or
annual  results of operations of the company.  (NOTE: The  preceding
sentence  applies  to  all legal proceedings involving  the  company
except  the breast implant litigation, which is discussed separately
in the next section).

Breast Implant Litigation

As of September 30, 1998, the company had been named as a defendant,
often  with multiple co-defendants, in 6,929 lawsuits and 144 claims
in  various  courts, all seeking damages for personal injuries  from
allegedly  defective  breast implants.  These  claims  and  lawsuits
purport  to  represent 22,757 individual claimants. It  is  not  yet
certain  how  many  of  these lawsuits and claims  involve  products
manufactured  and  sold  by  the  company,  as  opposed   to   other
manufacturers.   The company entered the business  of  manufacturing
breast  implants  in 1977 by purchasing McGhan Medical  Corporation.
In  1984,  the company sold the business to a corporation that  also
was named McGhan Medical Corporation.


<PAGE> 22

The  typical  claim  or  lawsuit  alleges  the  individual's  breast
implants caused one or more of a wide variety of ailments and  local
complications,   including,  but  not   limited   to,   non-specific
autoimmune   disease,  scleroderma,  lupus,  rheumatoid   arthritis,
fibromyalgia,  mixed connective tissue disease, Sjogren's  Syndrome,
dermatomyositis, polymyositis and chronic fatigue.

Plaintiffs in these cases typically seek monetary damages, often  in
unspecified  amounts, and also may seek certain types  of  equitable
relief, including requiring the company to fund the costs associated
with removal of the breast implants.

A  number  of  breast  implant claims and lawsuits  seek  to  impose
liability  on  the  company  under  various  theories  for  personal
injuries  allegedly caused by breast implants manufactured and  sold
by   manufacturers  other  than  the  company.  These  manufacturers
include,  but  are  not limited to, McGhan Medical  Corporation  and
manufacturers that are no longer in business or that are  insolvent,
whose  breast implants may or may not have been used in  conjunction
with  implants manufactured and sold by the company.   These  claims
raise  many difficult and complex factual and legal issues that  are
subject to many uncertainties, including the facts and circumstances
of  each  particular claim, the jurisdiction in which each  suit  is
brought, and differences in applicable law and insurance coverage.

A  number  of  breast  implant lawsuits  seek  to  recover  punitive
damages.  Any  punitive  damages that may  be  awarded  against  the
company  may  or  may  not be covered by certain insurance  policies
depending  on  the language of the insurance policy, applicable  law
and agreements with insurers.

In  addition to individual suits against the company, a class action
on  behalf  of  all  women with breast implants  filed  against  all
manufacturers of such implants has been conditionally certified  and
is  pending  in  the United States District Court for  the  Northern
District of Alabama (the "Court")(DANTE, ET AL., V. DOW CORNING,  ET
AL., U.S.D.C., N. Dist., Ala., 92-2589; part of IN RE: SILICONE  GEL
BREAST  IMPLANT  PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,  U.S.D.C.,  N.  Dist.
Ala., MDL 926, U.S.D.C., N. Dist. Ala., CV 92-P-10000-S; now held in
abeyance  pending  settlement proceedings in  the  settlement  class
action  LINDSEY,  ET  AL.,  V.  DOW  CORNING  CORPORATION,  ET  AL.,
U.S.D.C., N. Dist., Ala., CV 94-P-11558-S). Class actions,  some  of
which  have  been  certified, are pending in various  state  courts,
including, among others, Louisiana, Florida and Illinois, and in the
British Columbia courts in Canada.  The Louisiana state court action
(SPITZFADEN, ET AL., v. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, ET AL., Dist.  Ct.,
Parish of Orleans, 92-2589) has been decertified by the trial court.
Plaintiffs'  writ  for an emergency appeal from the  decertification
has  been  denied  by the Louisiana Supreme Court. A  normal  appeal
remains pending.

The  company  also  has  been served with a purported  class  action
brought on behalf of children allegedly exposed to silicone in utero


<PAGE> 23

and  through  breast  milk.  (FEUER, ET  AL.,  V.  MCGHAN,  ET  AL.,
U.S.D.C., E. Dist. NY, 93-0146.)  The suit names all breast  implant
manufacturers  as  defendants  and seeks  to  establish  a  medical-
monitoring fund.

On  December  22,  1995, the Court approved a revised  class  action
settlement  program  for resolution of claims  seeking  damages  for
personal  injuries  from allegedly defective  breast  implants  (the
"Revised Settlement Program").  The Revised Settlement Program is  a
revision  of  a  previous settlement pursuant to  a  Breast  Implant
Litigation Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") reached
on April 8, 1994, and approved by the Court on September 1, 1994.

The  Court ordered that, beginning after November 30, 1995,  members
of  the  plaintiff class may choose to participate  in  the  Revised
Settlement  Program  or  opt out, which would  then  allow  them  to
proceed with separate products liability actions.

The  Revised  Settlement Program as supplemented now  includes  both
foreign  and  domestic class members with implants  manufactured  by
certain  manufacturer  defendants, including  Baxter  International,
Bristol  Meyers-Squibb, the company and McGhan Medical  Corporation.
The  company's obligations under the Revised Settlement Program  are
limited  to  eligible  claimants with implants manufactured  by  the
company or its predecessors ("3M implants") or manufactured only  by
McGhan Medical Corporation after its divestiture from the company on
August  3,  1984  ("Post 8/84 McGhan implants").   With  respect  to
foreign  claimants and claimants with only Post 8/84 McGhan implants
(or only Post 8/84 McGhan implants plus certain other manufacturers'
implants), the benefits are more limited than for domestic claimants
with  3M implants. Post 8/84 McGhan implant benefits are payable  by
the   company,   Union  Carbide  Corporation  and   McGhan   Medical
Corporation.

In  general, the amounts payable to individual current claimants (as
defined  in the Court's order) under the Revised Settlement Program,
and  the company's obligations to make those payments, will  not  be
affected by the number of class members electing to opt out  of  the
Revised  Settlement  Program or the number of class  members  making
claims  under the Revised Settlement Program. In addition to certain
miscellaneous benefits, the Revised Settlement Program provides  for
two compensation options for current claimants with 3M implants.

Under  the  first  option,  denominated as  Fixed  Amount  Benefits,
current  claimants  with  3M implants who satisfy  disease  criteria
established  in the prior Settlement Agreement will receive  amounts
ranging  from $5,000 to $100,000, depending on disease  severity  or
disability  level;  whether  the claimant  can  establish  that  her
implants  have  ruptured;  and whether the  claimant  also  has  had
implants  manufactured  by Dow Corning.  Under  the  second  option,
denominated  as  Long-Term  Benefits,  current  claimants  with   3M
implants who satisfy more restrictive disease and severity criteria
specified under the Revised Settlement Program can receive  benefits
ranging from $37,500 to $250,000.


<PAGE> 24

In addition, current claimants with 3M implants are eligible for (a)
a  one-time payment of $3,000 upon removal of 3M implants during the
course of the class settlement, and (b) an advance payment of $5,000
against  the  above  referenced benefits upon  proof  of  having  3M
implants and upon waiving or not timely exercising the right to  opt
out  of the Revised Settlement Program.  Current claimants with only
Post  8/84  McGhan implants (or only Post 8/84 McGhan implants  plus
certain  other  manufacturers'  implants)  are  eligible  only   for
benefits ranging from $10,000 to $50,000.

Eligible  participants with 3M implants who  did  not  file  current
claims  but  are  able to satisfy the more restrictive  disease  and
severity  criteria  during an ongoing period of  15  years  will  be
eligible  for  the  Long-Term Benefits, subject to  certain  funding
limitations.  Such participants also will be eligible for an advance
payment  of $1,000 upon proof of having 3M implants and upon waiving
or  not  timely  exercising the right to  opt  out  of  the  Revised
Settlement  Program  or,  as an elective  option  expiring  on  June
15,1999,  a  payment  of  $3,500 in full settlement  of  all  breast
implant claims including any claim for Long-Term Benefits under  the
Revised   Settlement   Program.    Benefit   levels   for   eligible
participants who are not current claimants and have only  Post  8/84
McGhan  implants  (or  only Post 8/84 McGhan implants  plus  certain
other  manufacturers' implants) or who are current foreign claimants
will range from $10,000 to $50,000.  A benefit payment of $3,500 for
foreign registrants other than current foreign claimants,  so called
Other Registrants, has been agreed to by the Company and the Foreign
Claimants  Committee.   This  benefit  thus  completes  the  foreign
claimant  aspects of the Revised Settlement Program.   A  notice  to
foreign registrants has been approved by the Court.

As   of  the  date  of  this  filing,  the  company  believes   that
approximately 90% of the registrants, including those claimants  who
filed  current  claims, have elected to participate in  the  Revised
Settlement Program. It is still unknown as to what disease  criteria
all claimants have satisfied, and what options they have chosen.  As
a  result,  the total amount and timing of the company's prospective
payments  under the Revised Settlement Program cannot be  determined
with  precision at this time. As of September 30, 1998  the  company
has  paid $232 million into the court-administered fund as a reserve
against  costs  of claims payable by the company under  the  Revised
Settlement   Program   (including  a   $5   million   administrative
assessment). Additional payments will be made as necessary. Payments
to  date  have been consistent with the company's estimates  of  the
total liability for these claims.

In  the first quarter of 1994, the company took a pre-tax charge  of
$35  million ($22 million after tax) in recognition of its then best
estimate of its probable liabilities and associated expenses, net of
the probable amount of insurance recoverable from its carriers.   In
the  second  quarter of 1998, the company increased its estimate  of
the   minimum  probable  liabilities  and  associated  expenses   to
approximately  $1.1  billion. This amount represents  the  company's
best estimate of the minimum amount to cover the cost and expense of


<PAGE> 25

the Revised Settlement Program and the cost and expense of resolving
opt-out  claims and recovering insurance proceeds. After subtracting
payments  of $912 million as of September 30, 1998, for defense  and
other  costs  and  settlements  with litigants  and  claimants,  the
company had accrued liabilities of $188 million.

The  company  has substantial primary and excess products  liability
occurrence  insurance  coverage and claims-made  products  liability
insurance   coverage,  which  it  believes  provide   coverage   for
substantially all of its current exposure for breast implant  claims
and defense costs. Most insurers have alleged reservations of rights
to deny all or part of the coverage for differing reasons, including
each  insurer's obligations in relation to the other insurers  (i.e.
allocation) and which claims trigger both the various occurrence and
claims-made  insurance  policies. Some insurers  have  resolved  and
paid,  or  committed  to,  their  policy  obligations.  The  company
believes  the  failure  of many insurers to voluntarily  perform  as
promised  subjects them to the company's claims for excess liability
and damages for breach of the insurers' obligation of good faith.

On  September  22,  1994, three excess coverage occurrence  insurers
initiated  in  the  courts of the State of Minnesota  a  declaratory
judgment  action against the company and numerous insurance carriers
seeking adjudication of certain coverage issues and allocation among
insurers.  On  December  9, 1994, the company  initiated  an  action
against its occurrence insurers in the Texas State Court in and  for
Harrison County, seeking a determination of responsibility among the
company's various occurrence insurers with applicable coverages. The
state  of Texas has the most implant claims.  This action has  since
been  removed to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas,
and  stayed  pending resolution of the litigation in  the  Minnesota
courts.

The insurers that are parties to these actions generally acknowledge
that  they  issued products liability insurance to the  company  and
that  breast implant claims are products liability claims. The trial
in  Minnesota  to resolve the company's insurance coverage  and  the
financial  responsibility of occurrence insurers for breast  implant
claims and defense costs began on June 4, 1996, and is continuing in
phases with the next trial phase scheduled for January 4, 1999.

In mid-October 1995, the occurrence insurers that are parties to the
litigation  in  Minnesota filed more than  30  motions  for  summary
judgment  or  partial summary judgment. The insurers, through  these
motions,  attempted to shift all or a portion of the  responsibility
for  those  claims the company believes fall within  the  period  of
occurrence-based coverage (before 1986) into the period  of  claims-
made  coverage  (from and after 1986). The trial  court  denied  the
insurers'  motions,  ruling  that the  key  issues  of  trigger  and
allocation raised in these motions would be resolved at trial.   In
the  trial's  first  phase  in 1996, the court  granted  3M  partial
declaratory  judgment on the question of when insurance coverage  is



<PAGE> 26

"triggered."   The  court  also granted  the  insurers'  motion  for
partial  declaratory  judgment on the  question  of  the  allocation
method to be applied in the case. In July 1997 the trial court ruled
further  on the trigger issue and on the general allocation  method.
That  ruling was consistent with and further supported the company's
opinion  as  stated in the following paragraph.  In  November  1997,
upon  reconsideration,  the court reversed a  portion  of  its  July
ruling  and reinstated a portion of its previous ruling. The company
believes  that  conflicting  rulings  now  exist  that  need  to  be
clarified by the court and reconciled with applicable law.   Motions
to  clarify  the allocation methodology of triggered policies  under
these  rulings  are  pending.  Court options include  clarification,
further  trial  followed by additional rulings or certification  for
interlocutory (while the case is still pending) appeal.

The  company  believes it ultimately will prevail in this  insurance
litigation.   The  company's belief is based on an analysis  of  its
insurance  policies;  court decisions on these and  similar  issues;
reimbursement   by  insurers  for  these  types   of   claims;   and
consultation  with  outside counsel who  are  experts  in  insurance
coverage  matters.  If, however, the occurrence insurers  ultimately
prevail   in  this  insurance  litigation,  the  company  could   be
effectively   deprived  of  significant  and  potentially   material
insurance  coverage for breast implant claims.  (See  discussion  of
the accrued receivables for insurance recoveries below.)

As  of  September 30, 1998, the company had accrued receivables  for
insurance recoveries of $772 million, substantially all of which  is
contested  by the insurance carriers.  Various factors could  affect
the timing and amount of proceeds to be received under the company's
various  insurance  policies, including (i) the timing  of  payments
made  in  settlement  of  claims; (ii)  the  outcome  of  occurrence
insurance litigation in the courts of Minnesota (as discussed above)
and  Texas;  (iii) potential arbitration with claims-made  insurers;
(iv)  delays  in  payment by insurers; and (v) the extent  to  which
insurers  may  become  insolvent in the  future.  There  can  be  no
absolute assurance that the company will collect all amounts accrued
as being probable of recovery from its insurers.

The   company's  current  estimate  of  the  probable   liabilities,
associated expenses and probable insurance recoveries related to the
breast  implant  claims  is  based on the  facts  and  circumstances
existing at this time. New developments may occur that could  affect
the   company's   estimates  of  probable   liabilities   (including
associated   expenses)  and  the  probable   amount   of   insurance
recoveries.  These developments include, but are not limited to, (i)
the  ultimate Fixed Amount Benefit distribution to claimants in  the
Revised  Settlement Program; (ii) the success of and  costs  to  the
company  in  defending  opt-out claims, including  claims  involving
breast  implants not manufactured or sold by the company; (iii)  the
outcome  of  the occurrence insurance litigation in  the  courts  of
Minnesota  and Texas; and (iv) the outcome of potential  arbitration
with claims-made insurers.


<PAGE> 27

The   company  cannot  determine  the  impact  of  these   potential
developments  on  the  current  estimate  of  probable   liabilities
(including associated expenses) and the probable amount of insurance
recoveries.   Accordingly, the company is not able to  estimate  its
possible  future  liabilities  and  recoveries  beyond  the  current
estimates  of  probable amounts.  As new developments  occur,  these
estimates may be revised, or additional charges may be necessary  to
reflect the impact of these developments on the costs to the company
of   resolving  breast  implant  litigation,  claims  and  insurance
recoveries. Such revisions or additional future charges could have a
material adverse impact on the company's net income in the quarterly
period in which they are recorded. Although the company considers it
unlikely,  such  revisions or additional future charges  could  also
have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  consolidated  financial
position or annual results of operations of the company.

The  company conducts ongoing reviews, assisted by outside  counsel,
to  determine the adequacy and extent of insurance coverage provided
by  its  occurrence and claims-made insurers. The company  believes,
based on these ongoing reviews and the bases described in the fourth
preceding  paragraph,  it is probable that the collectible  coverage
provided by its applicable insurance policies is sufficient to cover
substantially all of its current exposure for breast implant  claims
and  defense  costs.  Based on the availability  of  this  insurance
coverage, the company believes that its uninsured financial exposure
has  not  materially  changed  since  the  first  quarter  of  1994.
Therefore, no recognition of additional charges has been made.

Environmental Matters

The   company   also  is  involved  in  a  number  of  environmental
proceedings   by  governmental  agencies  and  by  private   parties
asserting  liability  for  past waste  disposal  and  other  alleged
environmental  damage. The company conducts ongoing  investigations,
assisted by environmental consultants, to determine accruals for the
probable, estimable costs of remediation.  The remediation  accruals
are reviewed each quarter and changes are made as appropriate.


<PAGE> 28

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

      (a) The  following  documents are filed  as  exhibits  to  this
             Report.

           (12) A statement regarding the calculation of the ratio of
                earnings to fixed charges.  Page 30.

           (15) A letter from the company's independent auditors
                regarding unaudited interim financial statements.
                Page 31.

           (27) Financial data schedule (EDGAR filing only).

      (b)  Reports on Form 8-K:
The company filed a report on Form 8-K dated August 27, 1998.
In  a  release dated August 27, 1998, the company announced  that  it
expects  double-digit earnings growth for the coming three years  and
sales  to increase an average of eight percent per year.  The company
also  announced  its  plans for growth and productivity  improvement.
The company stated that it anticipates a pre-tax charge of as much as
$500  million  associated with actions outlined in the release.   The
news   release  contained  forward-looking  statements  relating   to
earnings  and  sales  growth  over the next  three  years  and  other
matters.  The news release was attached as Exhibit 99 to the Form 8-K.

None  of  the  other item requirements of Part II of  Form  10-Q  are
applicable to the company for the quarter ended September 30, 1998.


<PAGE> 29

                                 SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



                          MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY
                                         (Registrant)



Date:           March 31, 1999


                          /s/ Ronald G. Nelson

                           Ronald G. Nelson, 
                           Vice President and Controller



<PAGE> 30
<TABLE>

                                                       EXHIBIT 12

         MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
            CALCULATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in millions)
                                  (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                       Nine Months
                          Ended
                       September 30, Year    Year    Year    Year    Year
                             1998    1997    1996    1995    1994    1993
                           ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S>                         <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
EARNINGS
Income from continuing
  operations before
  income taxes and
  minority interest*        $1,555  $3,440  $2,479  $2,168  $2,011  $1,851

Add:
Interest on debt               106      94      79     102      70      39

Interest component of the
ESOP benefit expense            22      32      34      37      39      41

Portion of rent under
operating leases
representative of the
interest component              33      41      46      51      46      44

Less: Equity in undistributed
income of 20-50% owned
companies                        4       3      --       1       2      --
                            ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL EARNINGS AVAILABLE
FOR FIXED CHARGES           $1,712  $3,604  $2,638  $2,357  $2,164  $1,975
                            ======  ======  ======  ======  ======  ======

FIXED CHARGES
Interest on debt               106      94      79     102      70      39

Interest component of the
ESOP benefit expense            22      32      34      37      39      41

Portion of rent under
operating leases
representative of the
interest component              33      41      46      51      46      44
                            ------  ------  ------  ------  ------  ------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES         $  161  $  167  $  159  $  190  $  155  $  124
                            ======  ======  ======  ======  ======  ======

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
FIXED CHARGES                10.63   21.58   16.59   12.41   13.96   15.93

<FN>
<F1>
*1998  includes  a  pre-tax  restructuring charge  of  $332  million;  1997
includes a pre-tax gain on the sale of National Advertising Company of $803
million; 1995 includes a pre-tax restructuring charge of $79 million.
</FN>
</TABLE>

<PAGE>  31


                                                    EXHIBIT 15



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


We  are aware that our report dated October 22, 1998 on our reviews of
interim  condensed  consolidated financial  information  of  Minnesota
Mining  and  Manufacturing Company and Subsidiaries (the Company)  for
the  three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,  1998  and
1997,  and  included in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
September  30,  1998, is incorporated by reference  in  the  Company's
registration  statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-14791,  33-
49842,  33-58767, 333-26957, 333-30689 and 333-30691),  and  Form  S-3
(Registration  No.  33-48089). Pursuant  to  Rule  436(c),  under  the
Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of
the  registration statements prepared or certified by  us  within  the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



                                    /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


St. Paul, Minnesota
November 6, 1998


<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                       177
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,490
<PP&E>                                          12,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,500
<BONDS>                                          1,426
                                0
                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,965
<SALES>                                         11,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,236
<CGS>                                            6,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                       552
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                964
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       964
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.36
        

</TABLE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission