<PAGE> 1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant /X/
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
/ / Preliminary Proxy Statement / / CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION
ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
/X/ Definitive Proxy Statement
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec.240.14a-11(c) or sec.240.14a-12
</TABLE>
MONARCH
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2) or
Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
/ / $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
THE MONARCH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY
SIDNEY, OHIO 45365
[MONARCH LOGO]
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 1995
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of THE MONARCH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY, an
Ohio corporation, will be held at the office of the Company, 615 North Oak
Street, Sidney, Ohio, on Tuesday, May 2, 1995, at 1:00 o'clock P.M., Eastern
Daylight Savings Time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect three Directors to serve for a term expiring in 1998;
2. To act upon such other matters, including the shareholder proposal
(described in the accompanying proxy statement), as may properly come
before the meeting.
The close of business on March 14, 1995, has been fixed by the Board of
Directors as the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of
the meeting and to vote.
By Order of the Board of Directors
ROBERT J. SIEWERT
President
March 28, 1995
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IMPORTANT |
| YOUR PROXY IS ENCLOSED, PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN YOUR PROXY NOW. |
| THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE |
| UNITED STATES. |
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 3
THE MONARCH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY
615 NORTH OAK STREET
SIDNEY, OHIO 45365
------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
------------------
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 1995
SOLICITATION OF PROXY
The accompanying Proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors, and
the persons named in the Proxy have been selected by it. Solicitation is to be
made through the mails; the cost of preparing, assembling, and mailing the form
of Proxy and material used in the solicitation is to be paid by the Company. The
shares represented by Proxies in the accompanying form that are duly executed
and received by the Board of Directors before 1:00 o'clock P.M. on May 2, 1995,
will be voted. This Notice and Proxy Statement is being mailed to shareholders
on March 28, 1995.
REVOCATION OF PROXY
A shareholder may revoke a proxy at anytime prior to its exercise by
delivering to the Company a later dated Proxy or by giving notice to the Company
in writing or in open meeting.
VOTING SECURITIES
In accordance with the Regulations of the Company, the Board of Directors
has designated the close of business on March 14, 1995, as the record date for
the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the
meeting. As of that date, an aggregate of 3,759,724 voting shares, comprised of
3,744,967 Common Shares and 14,757 Series A Preferred Shares, were outstanding
and entitled to one vote each.
The holders of voting shares represented, in person or by proxy, at the
Annual Meeting constitute a quorum for the election of directors; but for any
other purpose, the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting shares of the
Company must be represented at the meeting, in person or by proxy.
Shares represented by proxies received by the Company will be counted as
present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining the existence of a
quorum, regardless of how or whether such shares are voted on a specific
proposal. Abstentions will be treated as votes cast on a particular proposal as
well as shares present at the Annual Meeting. Where nominee shareholders are not
permitted to vote on a specific issue because they did not receive specific
<PAGE> 4
instructions on the specific issue from the beneficial owners of the shares
("Broker Nonvotes"), such Broker Nonvotes will be treated as not present at the
meeting for purposes of calculating the results of the vote on the specific
issue. Accordingly, abstentions and Broker Nonvotes have the effect of a
negative vote on any proposal where the vote required to pass the proposal is a
percentage of the outstanding shares, but only abstentions have the effect of a
negative vote when the vote required to pass a proposal is a percentage of the
shares present at the Annual Meeting.
Under Ohio General Corporation Law the nominees for election as Directors
receiving the most votes are elected. Ohio law also provides that, if notice in
writing is given by any shareholder to the President, a Vice President, or the
Secretary of the Company not less than 48 hours before the time fixed for the
holding of the meeting that he desires that the voting for the election of
Directors be cumulative, and, if an announcement of the giving of the notice is
made upon the convening of the meeting, each shareholder shall have the right to
cumulate such voting power as he possesses in the election of Directors and to
give one candidate as many votes as the number of Directors to be elected
multiplied by the number of his votes equals, or to distribute his votes on the
same principle among two or more candidates, as he sees fit.
In the event that Directors are elected by cumulative voting and the
cumulated votes represented by Proxies given to the Board of Directors are
insufficient to elect all the nominees of the Board, then the Board's proxy
agents will vote such proxies cumulatively for the election of as many of the
nominees named below as possible, and in such order as the proxy agents may
determine. The order in which proxies may be cumulated by the proxy agents will
depend on a number of factors, including the number of directors that can be
elected based upon the shares voted for the Board's nominees and the manner in
which shareholders cumulate their votes in favor of particular candidates.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Company's Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with two
classes comprised of three directors and the other class being comprised of four
directors. One class of directors is elected at each Annual Meeting of
Shareholders for a term of three years.
At the 1995 Annual Meeting, shareholders will elect three directors who
will hold office until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 1998. The three
persons who have been nominated by the Board of Directors are William A. Enouen,
Joseph M. Rigot, and Robert J. Siewert, all of whom are currently directors of
the Company and are nominated to succeed themselves. In case any of these
nominees is, for any reason, not a candidate at the Annual Meeting, the Proxy to
that extent will be voted for such person or persons as the Board of Directors
may recommend. The Board, however, knows of no reason to anticipate that this
will occur.
2
<PAGE> 5
The nominees for election to the class of Directors whose term of office
will expire in 1998, and the other Directors whose terms of office continue
after the meeting, with information as to each of them, as of February 28, 1995,
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXPIRATION
OF
PRESENT
YEAR TERM OR
FIRST OF
NAME, AGE, ELECTED TERM FOR
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION, BUSINESS EXPERIENCE, AS WHICH
AND OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS DIRECTOR NOMINATED
- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
DAVID E. LUNDEEN (age 66), Retired as Vice President of the 1970 1997
Company and General Manager, Monarch Cortland, in November
1994, a position he had held for more than five years.
ROBERT B. MEEKER (age 66), President, Robert B. Meeker 1973 1997
Consultants since 1981; Senior Vice President and Group
Executive, Hobart Corporation, Troy, Ohio, manufacturer of
food processing and related machinery, prior to 1981. (2)
(3)
JOHN M. RICHARDSON (age 74), Retired on December 31,1982; 1979 1997
Senior Vice President, A. O. Smith Corporation,
diversified manufacturer of automobile and truck frames,
water heaters, agricultural equipment, and electric
motors, prior to December 31, 1982. (2) (3) (4)
JOHN A. BERTRAND (age 56), President of A. O. Smith 1993 1996
Electrical Products Company, a manufacturer of electric
motors (a division of A. O. Smith Corporation), for more
than five years. (1) (2) (4)
WALDEMAR M. GOULET (age 59), Professor of Finance at Wright 1991 1996
State University for more than five years and former Dean
of the College of Business and Administration at Wright
State University. (1)
KENNETH H. HOPKINS (age 66), Chairman of the Board of Field 1993 1996
Abrasive Incorporated, a manufacturer of abrasive
specialties, for more than five years. (1)
JOHN F. TORLEY (age 83), Chairman and Director of Morris 1966 1996
Bean & Co.; President from 1985 to 1992 of the Miami
Valley Research Institute, a promoter of research at local
universities in the Dayton, Ohio area, and former
President and current Director of the related Miami Valley
Research Foundation; formerly Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer, Amcast Industrial Corporation,
Dayton, Ohio, producer of metal castings; Director of Van
Dyne Crotty, Inc. (1) (2) (3) (4)
3
<PAGE> 6
<CAPTION>
EXPIRATION
OF
PRESENT
YEAR TERM OR
FIRST OF
NAME, AGE, ELECTED TERM FOR
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION, BUSINESS EXPERIENCE, AS WHICH
AND OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS DIRECTOR NOMINATED
- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
JOSEPH M. RIGOT (age 51), Partner-in-Charge, Thompson, Hine 1994 1998
and Flory, Dayton, Ohio office (attorneys) since May 1993
and a partner in such firm for more than five years. (3)
(5)
WILLIAM A. ENOUEN (age 66), Retired beginning December 1, 1990 1998
1993; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
The Mead Corporation, Dayton, Ohio, a forest products and
electronic publishing company, prior to December 1, 1993;
Director of Morris Bean & Co. (1) (2) (4)
ROBERT J. SIEWERT (age 57), President of the Company since 1988 1998
April 1988; formerly Vice President and General
Manager-Machine Tool Group of Oerlikon Motch Corporation,
a manufacturer of metal working machine tools, from August
1986 to April 1988, and Vice President and General Manager
of Giddings & Lewis Machine Tool Company, a manufacturer
of machine tool equipment, from August 1984 to August 1986
and of its Davis Tool Company subsidiary for more than
five years prior to August 1984; Director of Peerless
Machinery Corp. (2)
- ---------------
<FN>
(1) Member of the Audit Committee, which met twice during 1994 for the purpose
of reviewing with the independent auditors of the Company the scope and
thoroughness of the auditors' examination, considering recommendations of
the independent auditors, reviewing the adequacy of the Company's systems of
internal accounting controls with the independent auditors and management,
and recommending to the Board of Directors the selection of independent
auditors for the year.
(2) Member of the Executive Committee, which met once during 1994. The Executive
Committee has responsibility for acting on various matters between meetings
of the Board of Directors.
(3) Member of the Compensation Committee, which met twice during 1994.
(4) Member of the Nominating Committee, which met once during 1994. The
Nominating Committee is willing to consider any shareholder recommendations
respecting possible candidates for positions on the Board of Directors, and
a shareholder desiring to submit a recommendation to the Committee may do so
by sending the candidate's resume to the Secretary of the Company.
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE> 7
(5) The law firm of Thompson, Hine and Flory performed legal services for the
Company last year and is performing legal services for the Company during
the current year.
During 1994, there were four meetings of the Board of Directors, in
addition to meetings of Board committees. No Director attended fewer than 75
percent of the total number of Board meetings and meetings held by the
Committees of the Board on which he served. A member of the Board of Directors
who is not an officer of the Company is compensated for services as a Director
at the annual rate of $10,000 and also receives $800 per meeting for attendance
at Board meetings. In addition, a non-officer Director who serves on a Board
Committee is compensated for services on the basis of $600 per meeting for
attendance at Committee meetings, or $800 per meeting if he is Chairman of the
Committee.
<TABLE>
OWNERSHIP OF SHARES
The following table sets forth, as of March 14, 1995 unless otherwise
indicated, the number and percent of the Company's Common Shares beneficially
owned by each Director or nominee for election as a Director of the Company, by
each Named Officer, by each person known to the Company to be the beneficial
owner of more than five percent of the Company's Common Shares, and by all of
the Company's Directors and executive officers as a group.
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF COMMON
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR SHARES PERCENT
GROUP BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1) OF CLASS
- ----------------------------------- --------------------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
John A. Bertrand................... 200 (2)
William A. Enouen.................. 1,000 (2)
Waldemar M. Goulet................. 500 (2)
Kenneth H. Hopkins................. 1,000 (2)
Robert J. Kindt.................... 1,500 (2)
David E. Lundeen................... 12,600 (2)
Robert B. Meeker................... 4,672 (2)
John M. Richardson................. 100 (2)
Joseph M. Rigot.................... 500 (2)
Robert J. Siewert.................. 6,225 (2)
John F. Torley..................... 8,056 (2)
14 Directors and executive officers
as a group, including those
listed above..................... 39,555 1.1%
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc..... 232,800(3) 6.2%
Foyston, Gordon & Payne, Inc....... 255,300(4) 6.8%
Tweedy, Browne Company L.P., TBK
Partners, L.P. and Vanderbilt
Partners, L.P.................... 270,918(5) 7.2%
5
<PAGE> 8
- ---------------
<FN>
(1) Shares are treated as "beneficially owned" if a person has or shares voting
or dispositive power with respect to the shares or has a right to acquire
the shares within 60 days of March 14, 1995. Unless otherwise indicated,
total voting power and total dispositive power are exercised by each
individual and/or a member of his household. The number of shares included
in the table which a listed person or group has a right to acquire within 60
days of March 14, 1995 are: Mr. Kindt -- 1,500; Mr. Siewert -- 5,000 and
directors and executive officers as a group -- 9,250.
(2) Less than 1%.
(3) Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. ("Dimensional"), 1299 Ocean Avenue, Santa
Monica, CA 90401, a registered investment advisor, is deemed to own
beneficially 232,800 Common Shares as of December 31, 1994. These shares are
held in portfolios of DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., a registered
open-end investment company, or in series of the DFH Investment Trust
Company, a Delaware business trust, or the DFA Group Trust and DFA
Participation Group Trust, all of which Dimensional serves as investment
manager. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of all of these shares.
(4) Foyston, Gordon & Payne Inc., a registered investment counsel, is located at
151 Yonge Street, Suite 1208, Toronto, Ontario M5C 2W7.
(5) Tweedy, Browne Company L.P. ("TBC"), TBK Partners, L.P. ("TBK"), and
Vanderbilt Partners, L.P. ("Vanderbilt") have an address at 52 Vanderbilt
Avenue, New York, NY 10017. TBC is engaged primarily in the business of a
securities broker-dealer and investment advisor. TBK and Vanderbilt are
private investment partnerships engaged in the business of investing in
securities for their own accounts. TBC, TBK, and Vanderbilt may be deemed to
own beneficially 250,418, 15,000, and 5,500 Common Shares, respectively, and
may also be deemed a group under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. TBC,
TBK, and Vanderbilt make no admission that they are members of a group, and
they disclaim beneficial ownership of all of these shares.
</TABLE>
6
<PAGE> 9
BOARD COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Company's Executive Compensation program is administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. During 1994, the Committee was
comprised of the three independent, nonemployee Directors listed below. The
Committee has responsibility for fixing compensation for executives of the
Company and considering employee benefit programs generally. The Committee
submits the following report:
"EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICY. The Compensation Committee is
committed to a strong, positive link between business, performance, and
benefit programs. Our compensation policy is designed to improve
shareholder value by: attracting and retaining highly qualified and
productive individuals; maintaining externally competitive and internally
equitable compensation; basing compensation levels on both Company and
individual performance; and encouraging executive stock ownership so that
the executive shares the same interests as the shareholder.
BASE SALARY. The salaries of the executives are reviewed
annually. The Committee establishes salary levels based on responsibility,
Company performance, individual performance, internal equity, and
competitiveness.
STOCK OPTIONS. To better align the interests of Company
management and the shareholder, the Company, in 1994, designed and adopted
an employee stock option plan to replace the expired 1984 Employee Stock
Option Plan. This new plan covers all divisions and subsidiaries of the
Company.
CEO AND OTHER OFFICER COMPENSATION. Mr. Robert J. Siewert has
been President of the Company since 1988. Mr. Siewert's total compensation,
as well as that of two additional Company officers, is set forth in the
Summary Compensation Table. The Committee took into consideration the
present economic situation of the country, as well as that of the machine
tool industry, in considering compensation for all the Company's
executives. For 1994, Mr. Siewert's salary was the same as for 1993, and
the salary of the other two executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table was slightly increased to better reflect compensation
levels in the industry. No incentive compensation was payable to Mr.
Siewert or any other officer for 1994 services. We believe that Mr.
Siewert's total compensation, as well as that of the other officers, is
competitive in the external marketplace and reflective of Company and
individual performance. Throughout 1994, the Board of Directors of the
Company did not modify or reject any action or recommendation of the
Compensation Committee."
Compensation Committee
Robert B. Meeker
John M. Richardson
John F. Torley
7
<PAGE> 10
<TABLE>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the annual, long-term compensation and all
other compensation paid by the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31,
1994, 1993, and 1992, to the chief executive officer and the other executive
officers of the Company who earned in excess of $100,000 in salary and bonus for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994 (the "Named Officers").
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
COMPENSATION
------------
NUMBER OF
COMMON
ANNUAL SHARES
NAME AND PRINCIPAL COMPENSATION UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
POSITION YEAR SALARY($) OPTIONS COMPENSATION(1)
- ----------------------- -------- ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert J. Siewert 1994 $185,000 5,000 $924
President 1993 185,000 0 899
1992 184,583 0 873
David E. Lundeen (2) 1994 $129,770 2,000 $908
V.P. & General 1993 125,500 0 878
Manager 1992 119,500 0 837
Robert J. Kindt 1994 $124,250 2,000 $373
V.P. & General 1993 115,500 0 347
Manager 1992 109,167 0 328
- ---------------
<FN>
(1) The amount represents the Company's contribution for the Named Officers
under the Company's Retirement Savings Plan.
(2) Mr. Lundeen retired in November, 1994 as an employee of the Company after
more than 35 years of dedicated service.
</TABLE>
FISCAL 1994 STOCK OPTION GRANTS
The following table sets forth information concerning stock options granted
in fiscal 1994 under the Company's 1994 Employees Stock Option Plan to the Named
Officers. The table also sets forth the hypothetical gains that would exist for
the options at the end of their ten-year
8
<PAGE> 11
terms, assuming compound rates of stock appreciation of 0%, 5%, and 10%. The
actual future value of the options will depend on the market value of the
Company's common shares.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS(1) POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
-------------------------------------------- VALUE AT ASSUMED ANNUAL
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL RATES OF STOCK PRICE
SHARES OPTIONS APPRECIATION FOR OPTION
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO TERM(2)
OPTION EMPLOYEES IN EXERCISE EXPIRATION -----------------------
NAME GRANTS 1994 PRICE DATE 0% 5% 10%
- ------------------------------- ------------ -------- ---------- --- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert J. Siewert.... 5,000 22.6% $9.687 8/2/04 $0 $30,450 $77,150
David E. Lundeen..... 2,000 9.0% 9.687 8/2/04 0 12,180 30,860
Robert J. Kindt...... 2,000 9.0% 9.687 8/2/04 0 12,180 30,860
- ---------------
<FN>
(1) All options granted in 1994 were incentive stock options within the meaning
of the Internal Revenue Code, and 25% of the shares subject to an option
first become exercisable in each of the second, third, fourth, and fifth
year after the date of grant. The Committee which administers the plan may
permit the option price to be paid in cash, shares of the Company, or any
combination of the foregoing.
(2) The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of calculations at 0%
and at the 5% and 10% rates prescribed by rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and are not intended to forecast possible appreciation
of the Company's share price.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table sets forth information with respect to unexercised
options to purchase the Company's common shares granted under the Company's
employee stock option plans to the Named Officers and held by them at December
31, 1994. None of the Named Officers exercised stock options during fiscal 1994.
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES
UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED IN-
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS THE-MONEY OPTIONS
AT 12/31/94 AT 12/31/94(1)
----------------------------- -----------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ------------------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert J. Siewert........ 5,000 5,000 $ 0 $ 1,565
David E. Lundeen......... 0 0 0 0
Robert J. Kindt.......... 1,125 2,375 0 626
- ---------------
<FN>
(1) None of the exercisable options held at fiscal year end by the Named
Officers were in-the-money, and thus no values are indicated, because the
fair market value of the underlying securities did not exceed the exercise
price of the options.
</TABLE>
9
<PAGE> 12
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company provides retirement benefits for its salaried employees. The
Company's Pension Plan A provides for benefits based on the average of the
aggregate compensation during the five consecutive years of employment in the
ten consecutive years of employment preceding retirement that yield the highest
average. Compensation covered by the Plan includes salary paid for service
rendered while an employee but excludes bonuses.
The following table sets forth the estimated annual benefits payable at
normal retirement (age 65) under the Company's Pension Plan A to an employee,
including the Named Officers, with indicated final average base compensation, as
defined in the Plan, and periods of service. The benefit amounts are based upon
years of benefit service (not in excess of 35) multiplied by 1.25% of the final
average base compensation. The amounts shown in the table below have been
prepared on the straight life equivalent basis.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED ANNUAL BENEFIT
FINAL AVERAGE (ASSUMING RETIREMENT ON JANUARY 1, 1995)
ANNUAL BASE ------------------------------------------------------------
COMPENSATION 15 YEARS 20 YEARS 25 YEARS 30 YEARS 35 YEARS
- ---------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$125,000 $ 25,711 $ 34,281 $ 42,852 $ 51,422 $ 59,992
150,000 30,853 41,138 51,422 61,706 71,991
175,000 30,853 41,138 51,422 61,706 71,991
200,000 30,853 41,138 51,422 61,706 71,991
225,000 30,853 41,138 51,422 61,706 71,991
</TABLE>
The applicable years of benefit service as of January 1, 1995, for the
Named Officers are Mr. Siewert -- 7 years, Mr. Lundeen -- 35 years, and Mr.
Kindt -- 5 years. As noted above, Pension Plan A limits the maximum amount of
benefits thereunder by assuming a maximum period of benefit service of 35 years.
10
<PAGE> 13
COMMON SHARE PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following Common Share Performance Graph compares the five year
cumulative return, assuming dividend reinvestment, from investing $100 on
December 31, 1989, in each of the Company's Common Shares, the S&P 500 Index of
companies, and a peer group of various machine tool companies (the "Peer Group")
consisting of the following companies: Acme-Cleveland Corporation, Brown &
Sharpe Manufacturing Company, Cincinnati Milacron, Inc., Gleason Corporation,
The Monarch Machine Tool Company, Giddings & Lewis Inc., Hurco Companies Inc.,
Met-Coil Systems Corporation, and Salem Corporation.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Measurement Period Monarch
(Fiscal Year Covered) Machine Tool Peer Group S&P 500
<S> <C> <C> <C>
12/31/89 100.00 100.00 100.00
12/31/90 77.00 74.00 97.00
12/31/91 79.00 94.00 126.00
12/31/92 93.00 134.00 136.00
12/31/93 88.00 148.00 150.00
12/31/94 81.00 125.00 152.00
</TABLE>
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
Mr. Paul M. Lehman, 3747 E. Dorothy Drive, Orange, California 92669, owner
of 65,800 common shares, has given notice that he intends to present for action
at the Annual Meeting the following resolution:
11
<PAGE> 14
"Resolved that we the shareholders of The Monarch Machine Tool Company
recommend to the board of directors that they engage an investment banker
to advise them on ways to maximize shareholder value.
"Supporting Statement. Despite management's statements over the past
few years that operations would improve, the company is in its third
consecutive year of reporting losses to its shareholders. The company
reduced its annual dividend from $.80 to $.20 a share and it hasn't even
been able to earn the reduced dividend. The common stock is trading near
the low end of its range for many years and well below its book value.
"In view of the company's poor performance, I believe it is time for
the shareowners of the company to request that the directors explore other
ways to maximize the shareholders investment. Your vote for this proposal
will make that request clear to them."
YOUR DIRECTORS RECOMMEND A VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. Your Directors are
unequivocally committed to maximizing shareholder value. The Board and
management have, and will continue to be, focused on a business strategy which
involves, among other things, divestiture of underperforming units, acquisition
of compatible product lines, introduction of new products more responsive to
market demand, and cost reduction. While the Company's bottom line performance
has not yet reflected the benefits of these initiatives, the Board believes the
Company is positioned to compete profitably and effectively on a long-term basis
in the machine tool industry. Your Directors are opposed to the proposal to
engage an investment banker because it is only one narrowly-focused method, and
not the appropriate method at the present time to maximize shareholder value.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Coopers & Lybrand has been appointed as the Company's independent auditors
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1995, pursuant to the recommendation of
the Company's Audit Committee. Coopers & Lybrand has served as independent
auditors for the Company for more than 40 years.
A representative of Coopers & Lybrand is expected to be present at the
Annual Meeting with an opportunity to make a statement if he desires to do so,
and to respond to appropriate questions, with respect to that firm's examination
of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1994.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors has no knowledge of any other matters to be
presented at the meeting. In the event other matters do properly come before the
meeting, the persons named in the Proxy will vote in accordance with their best
judgment on the particular matters.
12
<PAGE> 15
1996 ANNUAL MEETING
The 1996 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is currently scheduled to be held
on May 7, 1996. The deadline for shareholders to submit proposals to be
considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for that meeting is November 30,
1995.
ANNUAL REPORT
The Annual Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 1994, was
mailed on March 23, 1995, to each shareholder of record on March 14, 1995.
THE MONARCH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY
ROBERT J. SIEWERT
President
March 28, 1995
13
<PAGE> 16
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
Copies of The Monarch Machine Tool Company's 1994 Annual Report on Form
10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are available without
charge (other than for exhibits) to shareholders upon written request sent to:
Attention: Corporate Secretary
The Monarch Machine Tool Company
P.O. Box 668
Sidney, Ohio 45365-0668
- ----------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------
NOTICE
OF
ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS
AND
PROXY STATEMENT
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[MONARCH LOGO] [MONARCH LOGO]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT
Each shareholder is requested to date, fill in, sign, and promptly return the
enclosed Proxy in the envelope provided.
A shareholder wishing to attend the meeting may withdraw his Proxy if he has
previously sent in his Proxy and vote in person.
ANNUAL MEETING
OF
SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 2, 1995
- ----------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 17
THE MONARCH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY
P R O X Y
ANNUAL MEETING, MAY 2, 1995
ROBERT B. RIETHMAN and EARL J. HULL, and each of
them, are hereby authorized to represent me at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on May
2, 1995, and at any adjournment, and at the meeting to
vote my shares on the following:
1. Election of Directors.
/ / FOR all nominees of the Board of Directors,
namely William A. Enouen, Joseph M. Rigot, and
Robert J. Siewert (except as marked to the
contrary below), including authority to cumulate
votes selectively among such nominees.
/ / WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees
listed below.
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for
any individual nominee, write that
nominee's name on the line provided
below.)
-----------------------------------------------------
2. Shareholder Proposal Described in Proxy Statement.
/ / For / / Against / / Abstain
3. Upon any other business that may properly come
before the meeting.
(Continued, and to be signed, on the reverse side.)
(Continued from the reverse side.)
THE MONARCH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY
P R O X Y
IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS
SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE SIDE, AND, WHERE NO CHOICE
IS SPECIFIED BY THE SHAREHOLDER, THE PROXY WILL BE
VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND
AGAINST PROPOSAL 2.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON
BEHALF
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
Dated , 1995
---------------
----------------------------
----------------------------
Please sign your name as
imprinted hereon, and, in
the case of multiple or
joint ownership, all should
sign.
Proxy Card