MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XIV LTD
SC 14D9/A, 1995-09-13
OPERATORS OF NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Previous: KRAUSES FURNITURE INC, 10-Q, 1995-09-13
Next: PAINEWEBBER RMA TAX FREE FUND INC, N14AE24, 1995-09-13



                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
                          ________________________


                             SCHEDULE 14D-9
       SOLICITATION/RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(D)(4)
                    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                           (AMENDMENT NO. 3)
                            ________________

       MCNEIL PACIFIC INVESTORS FUND 1972    MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XIV, LTD.

       MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND V, LTD.       MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XV, LTD.

       MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND IX, LTD.      MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XX, L.P.

       MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND X, LTD.       MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXIV, L.P.

       MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XI, LTD.      MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXV, L.P.
                               (NAME OF SUBJECT COMPANY)

                                 MCNEIL PARTNERS, L.P.
                          (NAME OF PERSON FILING STATEMENT)

                            Limited Partnership Units
                          (TITLE OF CLASS OF SECURITIES)

                 582566 10 5                     582568 88 7
                 582568 20 0                     582568 50 7
                 582568 10 1                     None
                 582568 20 0                     582568 88 7
                 582568 30 9                     582568 87 9
                   (CUSIP NUMBERS OF CLASSES OF SECURITIES)
                             ______________________

                               Donald K. Reed
                           MCNEIL PARTNERS, L.P.
                      13760 Noel Road, Suite 700, LB70
                           Dallas, Texas  75240
                              (214) 448-5800
     (NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO
     RECEIVE NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PERSON(S)
     FILING STATEMENT)

                                Copy to:

                          Patrick J. Foye, Esq.
                  SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM
                           919 Third Avenue
                       New York, New York  10022
                           (212) 735-2274



               This Amendment No. 3 amends and supplements Items 3, 8
     and 9 of the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule
     14D-9 (the "Schedule 14D-9") of McNeil Partners, L.P., a Delaware
     limited partnership (the "Partnership"), filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on August
     18, 1995, Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 14D-9 filed with the
     Commission on August 25, 1995 and Amendment No. 2 to the Schedule
     14D-9 filed with the Commission on September 8, 1995.  Unless
     otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used but not defined
     in this Amendment No. 3 have the meanings set forth in the
     Schedule 14D-9, as amended.

     ITEM 3.   IDENTITY AND BACKGROUND.

               Item 3(b) is hereby supplemented by adding the
     following:

               The information set forth in Exhibit (c)(6) attached
     hereto is incorporated herein by reference.

     ITEM 8.   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED.

               Item 8 is hereby supplemented by adding the following:

               On or about August 18, 1995, three individuals
     commenced an action in the Superior Court of the State of
     California for the County of Los Angeles (the "California 
     Superior Court"), against McNeil Partners, McNeil Investors, 
     McREMI, Robert A. McNeil, Carole J. McNeil, Donald K. Reed 
     ("Reed") and Robert C. Irvine ("Irvine"), entitled James 
     F. Schofield et al. v. McNeil Partners, L.P. et al., Case 
     No. BC133799.  The Schofield action is purportedly brought 
     in part as a class action, on behalf of all the limited
     partners (the "Limited Partners") of McNeil Real Estate Fund V,
     Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund IX, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund
     X, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XI, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate
     Fund XIV, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XV, Ltd., McNeil Real
     Estate Fund XX, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXIV, L.P., and
     McNeil Real Estate Fund XXV, L.P., and in part as a derivative
     action on behalf of such Partnerships.

               The Schofield Complaint asserts that defendants have
     breached their fiduciary duties to the Limited Partners and have
     breached the partnership agreements of the aforementioned
     Partnerships by allegedly, inter alia, failing to maximize the
     value of such Partnerships, seeking to entrench themselves in the
     management of such Partnerships, and receiving excessive
     management and other fees from such Partnerships.  The Complaint
     seeks, inter alia, an order directing defendants to discharge
     their fiduciary duties to such Partnerships and enjoining them
     from violating their fiduciary duties, as well as an award to
     plaintiffs and to such Partnerships of compensatory damages in an
     unspecified amount.

               On or about August 21, 1995, the same persons who filed
     the Schofield action in the California Superior Court filed
     another purported class-action and derivative Complaint in the
     United States District Court for the Southern District of New
     York, entitled James F. Schofield et al. v. McNeil Partners,
     L.P. et al, 95 Civ. 6711.  The Schofield plaintiff's federal Com-
     plaint contains allegations similar to those of their California
     Complaint, together with a claim that defendants violated
     Sections 14(d) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
     in that the Partnerships' Schedules 14D-9 filed on August 18,
     1995 in connection with the HR Offers contained inadequate and
     incomplete information.

               On or about August 22, 1995, two individuals filed
     separate, but substantially identical, Complaints in the California 
     Superior Court, entitled Warren Heller v. McNeil Partners L.P. et al.,
     Case No. BC133957, and Alfred Napoletano v. McNeil Partners L.P.
     et al., Case No. BC133849.  These Complaints are purportedly
     brought as class actions, on behalf of all the limited partners
     of the ten Partnerships, against defendants McNeil Partners,
     McNeil Investors, Robert McNeil, Carole McNeil and the ten
     Partnerships.  Each of the Complaints alleges, in substance, that
     defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the limited
     partners by failing to maximize the value of the Partnerships. 
     The Complaints seek, inter alia, an order directing defendants to
     fulfill their fiduciary duties and enjoining them from blocking
     any potential acquisition proposal for the Partnerships, and an
     award of damages in an unspecified amount.

               On or about August 23, 1995, an action was filed in the
     District Court of Dallas County, Texas, entitled Robert Lewis v.
     McNeil Partners, L.P. et al.  The Original Petition is
     purportedly brought on behalf of a class consisting of all the
     limited partners of the ten Partnerships, against defendants
     McNeil Partners, McNeil Investors, Robert McNeil, Reed and
     Irvine.  The Lewis Complaint alleges that defendants have
     breached their fiduciary duties and the partnership agreements of
     the Partnerships by failing to maximize the value of the
     Partnerships upon receipt of the HR Offers.  The Complaint seeks,
     inter alia, an order directing defendants to take steps to
     maximize the price to be paid to limited partners for their units
     in the Partnerships.  On or about September 7, 1995, the
     plaintiff in the Lewis action filed a motion for a temporary
     injunction to this effect, together with a request for a
     temporary restraining order prohibiting defendants from
     registering any change in the ownership of units in the
     Partnerships pending a hearing on the injunction motion.

               Each of the five actions described above is at a
     preliminary stage.  Defendants have not yet responded to the
     Complaint or Petition in any of these actions.

     ITEM 9.   MATERIAL TO BE FILED AS EXHIBITS.

               Item 9 is hereby supplemented by adding the following:

               (c)(6)         Letter Agreement dated September 12,
                              1995 by and among Carl C. Icahn, High
                              River, and McNeil Partners.


                                 SIGNATURE

               After reasonable inquiry and to the best of my
     knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set forth in
     this statement is true, complete and correct.

     Dated:  September 8, 1995

                              MCNEIL PARTNERS, L.P.
                              General Partner of each of the Partnerships

                                 By:    McNeil Investors, Inc.
                                        General Partner

                                   By:  /s/ Donald K. Reed       
                                        __________________________
                                            Donald K. Reed
                                            President


                               EXHIBIT INDEX

       Exhibit                  Description                    Page

       (c)(6)   Letter Agreement dated September 12, 1995
                by and among Carl C. Icahn, High River and
                McNeil Partners.




                                                     Exhibit (c)(6)

                        HIGH RIVER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                        September 12, 1995

          Robert A. McNeil
          Carole J. McNeil
          McNeil Partners, L.P.
          13760 Noel Road, Suite 700
          Dallas, Texas  75240

          Dear Mr. and Mrs. McNeil:

                    Reference is made to the letter agreement among
          the undersigned and McNeil Partners, L.P. dated August
          24, 1995, as amended by the letter agreement among the
          undersigned and McNeil Partners, L.P., Inc. dated
          September 7, 1995 (the "August 24th Letter Agreement"). 
          Capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have
          the meanings ascribed to them in the August 24th Letter
          Agreement.

                    The parties to this letter agreement hereby
          agree that, except as otherwise hereafter agreed in
          writing by the such parties:

               1.   The August 24th Letter Agreement is hereby
          amended by substituting "September 15, 1995" for
          "September 12, 1995" in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 of
          such August 24th Letter Agreement.

               2.   McNeil Partners shall have the absolute right,
          from time to time through 12 o'clock noon on September
          14, 1995, to require High River to extend, and upon
          receipt of written notice from McNeil Partners, High
          River shall unconditionally extend, the expiration date
          of the Offers to Purchase and High River shall, upon
          receipt of such notice, issue a press release no later
          than the next business day announcing such extension;
          provided, however, under no circumstances shall McNeil
          Partners have the right to require High River to extend
          the expiration date of the Offers to Purchase beyond
          September 28, 1995.

               3.   Each party to this letter agreement represents
          and warrants to the other party that during the period
          commencing upon the termination of its obligations under
          Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the August 24th Letter
          Agreement (the "Obligations") and ending upon the
          execution of this letter agreement, it has not done any
          act which would have violated the Obligations had they
          been in effect at that time. 

               4.   Notwithstanding Paragraph 5 of the August 24th
          Letter Agreement, McNeil Partners may, in its discretion,
          mail or cause to be mailed to limited partners of the
          Partnerships, the attached press release.

               5.   Nothing in this letter agreement shall be
          deemed to be, or shall be, a waiver by either party to
          this letter agreement of the respective rights under the
          August 24th Letter Agreement or the letter agreement
          dated September 7, 1995 among the undersigned and McNeil
          Partners.

               If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please so
          indicate by executing this letter in the space provided
          below.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   High River Limited Partnership

                                        By: Riverdale Investors Corp., Inc.

                                        /s/ Edward E. Mattner      
                                        _____________________________ 
                                        Edward E. Mattner

                                   /s/ Carl C. Icahn           
                                   __________________________
                                   Carl C. Icahn

          Agreed and Accepted

          McNeil Partners, L.P.

               By:  McNeil Investors, Inc.

               /s/ Robert A. McNeil          
               ________________________
               Robert A. McNeil
               Chairman

               /s/ Carole J. McNeil           
               ________________________
               Carole J. McNeil 
               Co-Chairman


          CONTACT: D.F. King & Co., Inc.     The Herman Group, Inc.
                   (800) 628-8538            (800) 658-2007

          FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

                      HIGH RIVER TENDER OFFERS FOR MCNEIL 
                         LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS EXTENDED 

                    Dallas, Texas and New York, New York, September
          12, 1995--High River Limited Partnership announced today
          that it has extended the expiration date of its tender
          offers (the "Tender Offers") for units of limited
          partnership interest in each of McNeil Pacific Investors
          Fund 1972, McNeil Real Estate Fund V, Ltd., McNeil Real
          Estate Fund IX, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund X, Ltd.,
          McNeil Real Estate Fund XI, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund
          XIV, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XV, Ltd., McNeil Real
          Estate Fund XX, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXIV, L.P.
          and McNeil Real Estate Fund XXV, L.P. (collectively, the
          "Partnerships") until 12:00 midnight, New York City time,
          on September 25, 1995.  

                    High River and McNeil Partners, L.P., the general
          partner of each of the Partnerships ("McNeil Partners"),
          are currently engaged in settlement discussions which,
          among other things, may result in settlement of litigation
          with respect to the Tender Offers.  No assurance can be
          given as to the outcome of those discussions.  

                    The Tender Offers are being made pursuant to the
          Offers to Purchase dated August 3, 1995, as amended and
          supplemented. 




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission