<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. 1)
Filed by the registrant [x]
Filed by a party other than the registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary proxy statement
[x] Definitive proxy statement
[ ] Definitive additional materials
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
________________________________________________________________________________
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
________________________________________________________________________________
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[x] $125 per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(j)(2).
[ ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
14a-6(i)(3).
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
________________________________________________________________________________
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transactions applies:
________________________________________________________________________________
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:
________________________________________________________________________________
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
________________________________________________________________________________
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identity the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid:
________________________________________________________________________________
(2) Form, schedule or registration statement no.:
________________________________________________________________________________
(3) Filing party:
________________________________________________________________________________
(4) Date filed:
________________________________________________________________________________
<PAGE> 2
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
47200 Bayside Parkway
Fremont, California 94538
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
March 23, 1995
TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS:
You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SEEQ
TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), to be held on
Thursday, March 23, 1995 at 3:00 p.m., local time, at the offices of the
Company at 47200 Bayside Parkway, Fremont, California 94538, for the
following purposes:
1. To elect directors to serve for the ensuing year.
2. To ratify the appointment of Price Waterhouse LLP as independent
accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending September 24, 1995.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournment thereof.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy
Statement that accompanies this Notice.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on February 7, 1995,
are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any
continuation or adjournment thereof.
By order of the Board of Directors
RALPH J. HARMS
Secretary
Fremont, California
February 15, 1995
ALL STOCKHOLDERS ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN
PERSON. HOWEVER, TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE
URGED TO VOTE, SIGN, AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN
THE POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE ENCLOSED FOR THAT PURPOSE.
<PAGE> 3
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
TO BE HELD MARCH 23, 1995
GENERAL
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the
Board of Directors of SEEQ Technology Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company" or "SEEQ"), of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on March 23, 1995, or at any adjournment or
postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Stockholders of record on February 7, 1995
will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be
held at 3:00 p.m. at the principal executive offices of the Company located at
47200 Bayside Parkway, Fremont, California 94538.
It is anticipated that this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card will
be first mailed to stockholders on or about February 15, 1995.
VOTING RIGHTS
The close of business on February 7, 1995 was the record date for
stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any
adjournments thereof. As of that date, the Company had 25,818,152 shares of
its common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding and entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share of common stock so held. A majority of the shares of common stock
entitled to vote will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at
the Annual Meeting.
If any stockholder is unable to attend the Annual Meeting, such stockholder
may vote by proxy. The enclosed proxy card is solicited by the Company's Board
of Directors (the "Board of Directors" or the "Board") and, when the proxy card
is returned properly completed, it will be voted as directed by the stockholder
on the proxy card. Stockholders are urged to specify their choices on the
proxy card. If a proxy card is signed and returned without choices specified,
in the absence of contrary instructions, the shares of common stock represented
by such proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1 and 2. Management does not know of
any matters to be presented at this Annual Meeting other than those set forth
in this Proxy Statement and in the Notice accompanying this Proxy Statement.
If other matters should properly come before the meeting, the proxy holders
will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
An affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and voting at the
meeting is required for approval of all items being submitted to the
stockholders for their consideration. Abstentions and broker non-votes each
are included in determining the number of shares present and voting at the
Annual Meeting and each is tabulated separately. Abstentions are counted in
tabulations of the votes cast on proposals presented to stockholders, whereas
broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of determining whether a proposal
has been approved.
1.
<PAGE> 4
The Annual Report of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 25, 1994
has been mailed concurrently with the mailing of the Notice of Annual Meeting
and Proxy Statement to all stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at
the Annual Meeting.
REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES
Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before its
exercise. A proxy may be revoked by filing with the Secretary of the Company
an instrument of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or
may be revoked by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The Company will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. Copies of
solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries, and
custodians holding shares in their names that are beneficially owned by others
to forward to such beneficial owners. The Company may reimburse such persons
for their costs of forwarding the solicitation material to such beneficial
owners. The original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by
solicitation by telephone, telegram, or other means by directors, officers,
employees or agents of the Company. No additional compensation will be paid to
these individuals for any such services. Except as described above, the
Company does not intend to solicit proxies other than by mail.
2.
<PAGE> 5
PROPOSAL NO. 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Each director to be elected at the Annual Meeting will hold office until the
next annual meeting of stockholders and until a successor for such director is
elected and has qualified, or until the death, resignation, or removal of such
director. There are four nominees, each of whom is currently a director of
the Company. Each of the Company's current directors, other than Charles C.
Harwood, was elected to the Board by the stockholders at the last annual
meeting. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected,
and the Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will be
unavailable or will decline to serve. In the event, however, that any nominee
is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting,
the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by the
current Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. In the event that additional
persons are nominated for election as directors, the proxyholders intend to
vote all proxies received by them for the nominees listed below. Unless
otherwise instructed, the proxyholders will vote the proxies received by them
for the nominees named below. Mr. J. Daniel McCranie is not standing for
re-election to the Board of Directors and will cease to be a Director effective
as of the date of the Annual Meeting. The four candidates receiving the
highest number of the affirmative votes of the shares entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting will be elected directors of the Company. The proxies solicited
by this Proxy Statement may not be voted for more than four nominees.
NOMINEES
Set forth below is information regarding the nominees to the Board of
Directors.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age
---- ---
<S> <C>
Alan V. Gregory 61
Charles C. Harwood 67
Phillip J. Salsbury 52
Peter C. Chen 55
</TABLE>
Alan V. Gregory has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the
Company since August 1992 and has served as the Company's Chairman of the Board
since October 1993. Since 1983, Mr. Gregory has been President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of XECOM, Inc., a
modem manufacturer. From 1978 to 1983, Mr. Gregory was a private investor.
From 1975 to 1978, he served as Vice President and General manager of the MOS
Divisions of Fairchild Semiconductor Incorporated, a semiconductor
manufacturer. From 1969 to 1975, Mr. Gregory was employed by Signetics
Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer, and served as Corporate Vice
President and General manager of the Analog Division from 1973 to 1975. Mr.
Gregory was also a co-founder of Omni Technology Incorporated, an electronics
test services company, and served as one of its directors from 1980 to 1986.
Charles C. Harwood has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the
Company since May 1994. Since December 1992, Mr. Harwood has been an
independent management consultant. From 1985 through December 1992, Mr. Harwood
was a co-founder of The Quality Improvement Company, a management
consulting firm. From 1970 through 1985, Mr. Harwood served as President of
Signetics Corporation. Mr. Harwood is also a director of XECOM and North
American Management Company, an investment advisory firm.
Phillip J. Salsbury, a founder of the Company, has served as the Company's
President and Chief Executive Officer since October 1993. Dr. Salsbury has
served as a member of the Board of Directors since
3.
<PAGE> 6
the founding of the Company in 1981 and, from 1981 through September 1993,
served as the Company's Vice President, Chief Technical Officer and Secretary.
From 1973 until 1980, Dr. Salsbury served in various engineering management
positions for Intel Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer. Dr. Salsbury is
a co-inventor under nine patents in the area of MOS (metal oxide silicon)
devices and circuits.
Peter C. Chen has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company
since January 18, 1994. Since December 1992, Dr. Chen has been Chairman of
Specom Technology Corporation, a multimedia communications subsystem
manufacturer, and President of Crosslink Semiconductor Corporation, a
semiconductor design company. From December 1991 to May 1992, Dr. Chen was the
Chairman of Mosel-Vitelic Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer. From 1983
to December 1991, Dr. Chen served as the President and CEO of MOS Electronics
Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer. Dr. Chen received a Ph.D. in
Electrical Engineering from Cornell University in 1971. Dr. Chen was appointed
to the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to the right of Hualon
Microelectronics Corporation to designate one member of the Board of Directors
for election by the stockholders. See the "Certain Transactions" section
below.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL OF THE ABOVE
NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors held ten (10) meetings during fiscal 1994. Each
director, other than Mr. McCranie and Mr. Chen, attended more than seventy-five
percent (75%) of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board
of Directors held during the fiscal year, or portion of the fiscal year, during
which such director served as a member of the Board, and (ii) the total number
of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which such director served.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors recommends engagement of the
Company's independent accountants, approves services performed by such
accountants, and reviews and evaluates the Company's accounting system and its
system of internal controls. This committee, which consists of Directors
Gregory and Harwood, held two (2) meetings during fiscal 1994.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has overall
responsibility for the Company's compensation policies and determines the
compensation payable to the Company's executive officers, including their
participation in certain of the Company's employee benefit plans. This
committee, which consists of Directors Gregory, Harwood and Salsbury, held one
(1) meeting during fiscal 1994.
The Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors has the exclusive
authority to administer the Company's Restated 1982 Stock Option Plan (the
"1982 Stock Option Plan") and to make stock option grants under the Plan,
including grants to executive officers. This committee, which consists of
Directors Gregory and Harwood, held one (1) meeting during fiscal 1994.
The Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors nominates persons to serve
on the Board of Directors. Any stockholder who wishes to recommend a
prospective nominee for the Board of Directors for consideration by the
nominating Committee may submit such recommendation to Mr. Alan V. Gregory,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, SEEQ Technology Incorporated, 47200
Bayside Parkway, Fremont, California 94538. This Committee, which consists of
Directors Gregory, Harwood and Salsbury, held one (1) meeting during fiscal
1994.
4.
<PAGE> 7
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
It is the general policy of the Company that each non-employee director of
the Company who is not appointed as a director pursuant to any contractual or
other right or arrangement be paid $2,000 for each quarterly meeting of the
Board of Directors attended and $1,000 for certain additional Board or
committee meetings attended. In addition, each such director is eligible for
reimbursement in accordance with Company policy for expenses incurred in
connection with his attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and the
committees thereof.
Under the Company's 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "1989
Stock Option Plan"), an individual who is not an employee of the Company and
has not been appointed or elected as a director pursuant to any contractual or
other right or arrangement will receive an automatic option grant for 20,000
shares of the Company's common stock upon becoming a member of the Board, and
each such individual who continues to serve as a non-employee Board member will
receive additional automatic option grants, each for 10,000 shares, at annual
intervals over his period of Board service, beginning with the second Annual
Stockholders Meeting following his initial election or appointment to the
Board. Under this Plan, Mr. Gregory received a 20,000 share option grant in
August 1992 with an exercise price of $1.4375 per share, and a 10,000 share
option grant in February 1994 with an exercise price of $1.375 per share; and
Mr. Harwood received a 20,000 share option grant in April, 1994 with an
exercise price of $1.125 per share. Each option granted under the 1989 Stock
Option Plan will have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market
value of the Company's common stock on the automatic grant date and will have a
maximum term of 10 years. The option will become exercisable for all the
option shares upon the optionee's completion of 6 months of Board service
measured from the grant date, but any shares purchased under the option will be
subject to repurchase by the Company, at the original exercise price paid per
share, should the optionee cease Board service prior to vesting in the
purchased shares. Each 20,000 share option grant will vest in two equal annual
installments over the optionee's period of Board service measured from the
grant date, and the 10,000 share option grant which will be made to each
eligible non-employee Board member at the time of the 1995 Annual
Stockholders Meeting will vest upon that individual's completion of two years
of Board service measured from the grant date. However, the shares subject to
each outstanding option grant under the 1989 Stock Option Plan will immediately
vest should the Company be acquired by merger or asset sale or should the
optionee die or become disabled while serving as a Board member or should there
occur a hostile takeover of the Company through tender offer for 25% or more of
the outstanding common stock or change in the majority of the Board by proxy
contest. Upon the successful completion of a hostile tender offer for 25% or
more of the outstanding common stock, each automatic option grant will be
canceled in return for a cash payment from the Company in an amount per
canceled option share equal to the greater of (i) the highest tender offer
price per share paid for the common stock or (ii) the fair market value per
share on the option cancellation date, less the option exercise price per
share.
No other compensation is paid to directors of the Company in respect of their
services as directors.
5.
<PAGE> 8
MANAGEMENT
Set forth below is information regarding the executive officers of the
Company who are not directors:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Ralph J. Harms 45 Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Philip A. Ortiz 48 Vice President, Worldwide Sales
Walter P. Gebauer 47 Vice President, Manufacturing
</TABLE>
Ralph J. Harms has served as the Company's Vice President, Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary since October 1993. From
January 1991 to October 1993, he served as the Company's Vice President,
Finance, and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Harms served as the Company's Vice
President, Business Development from January 1990 to January 1991. Mr. Harms
served as the Company's Vice President, General Manager, Logic Division, from
March 1989 through December 1989, as the Company's Vice President, Controller
from July 1988 through March 1989, and as the Company's Corporate Controller
from September 1983 to March 1989. From January 1981 until September 1983, he
was controller of the MOS memories division at Signetics Corporation, a
semiconductor manufacturer. From December 1979 until January 1981, Mr. Harms
was finance manager of fabrication facilities at Intel Corporation, a
semiconductor manufacturer.
Philip A. Ortiz has served as the Company's Vice President, Worldwide
Sales since September 1992. From October 1988 until June 1992, he was the
Company's Vice President, Worldwide Sales. From June 1992 to September 1992,
Mr. Ortiz was on leave from the Company. Mr. Ortiz served as the Company's
Vice President, International Sales from March 1988 to October 1988. Mr. Ortiz
has served in international and domestic sales activities for the Company since
1983 and was first appointed as Vice President in January 1987. From 1980 to
1983, Mr. Ortiz was director of marketing and sales for California Devices,
Inc., a semiconductor manufacturer. From 1970 to 1980, he held various
marketing and sales positions at American Micro-Systems, Inc., a semiconductor
manufacturer.
Walter P. Gebauer has served as the Company's Vice President of
Manufacturing since July 1994. From February 1992 to June 1994, Mr. Gebauer
served as General Manager and Director of Operations for Kodiak Technology
Incorporated, a subsidiary of the Company. From March 1991 to January 1992,
Mr. Gebauer served as Director of Operations for the Company. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Gebauer spent twelve years in various management positions
with National Semiconductor and five years with Signetics Corporation, both
semiconductor manufacturers.
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
SEEQ and Hualon Microelectronics Corporation, a corporation organized
under the laws of Taiwan, the Republic of China ("Hualon"), entered into a
Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 16, 1990 (the "Stock Purchase Agreement")
pursuant to which Hualon purchased for cash 1,625,000 shares of SEEQ common
stock at $3.25 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $5,281,250. In
addition, the Stock Purchase Agreement provides for the election of a
representative of Hualon to the SEEQ Board of Directors on the terms set forth
in the Stock Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to this right, Hualon has appointed
Dr. Peter C. Chen to the Company's Board of Directors. SEEQ and Hualon also
entered into a Technology Transfer and Foundry Agreement dated July 16, 1990
(the "Foundry Agreement") pursuant to which SEEQ agreed to
6.
<PAGE> 9
license to Hualon certain of SEEQ's processes and products, and the underlying
technology with respect thereto, and Hualon agreed to manufacture products on
SEEQ's behalf and act as an alternate source for certain of such products in
certain geographical markets (in exchange for which SEEQ will receive royalty
payments). In addition, the Foundry Agreement provides for the joint
development of new products and processes based on certain of the products and
processes licensed by SEEQ under such Agreement. The Foundry Agreement was
terminated by SEEQ during fiscal 1994. Pursuant to the Foundry Agreement, the
Company paid to Hualon an aggregate of approximately $1.5 million during fiscal
1994.
7.
<PAGE> 10
SHARE OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
ownership of the Company's common stock as of December 31, 1994 by (i) all
persons known by the Company to be beneficial owners of five percent (5%) or
more of its outstanding common stock, (ii) each director of the Company and
each nominee for director, (iii) each of the named executive officers, and (iv)
all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP(1)
-------------------------------------
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER SHARES CLASS
------------------------ ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Atmel Corporation 3,614,701 14.0%
2125 O'Nel Drive
San Jose, CA 95131
Hualon Microelectronics Corporation 1,625,000 6.3%
c/o The E-Hsin International Corporation
42 Station 2, 6th Floor
Chung Shan North Road
Taipei, Taiwan
Advanced Micro Devices 1,333,350 5.2%
906 Thompson Place
Sunnyvale, CA 94088
Phillip J. Salsbury 545,492(2) 2.1%
Alan V. Gregory 118,500(3) *
Charles C. Harwood 87,000(4) *
Peter C. Chen 0(5) *
Ralph J. Harms 177,844(6) *
Philip A. Ortiz 69,535(7) *
Walter P. Gebauer 71,706(8) *
All current directors and executive officers
as a group (7 persons) 1,070,077(9) 4.0%
</TABLE>
- ----------------------
* Less than one percent.
(1) Unless otherwise indicated, each of the beneficial owners named in the
table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares
shown as owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.
(2) Does not include 1,333 shares of common stock owned by trusts for the
benefit of Mr. Salsbury's children, as to which Dr. Salsbury disclaims
beneficial ownership. Includes 471,889 shares of common stock subject to
issuance upon exercise of options exercisable on December 31, 1994 or
within 60 days thereafter.
(3) Includes 30,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 1994.
8.
<PAGE> 11
(4) Includes 20,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 1994.
(5) Does not include the 1,625,000 shares held by Hualon. Dr. Chen has been
appointed to the Company's Board of Directors as the representative of
Hualon. See "Certain Transactions."
(6) Includes 177,844 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 1994.
(7) Includes 69,528 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 1994.
(8) Includes 71,706 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 1994.
(9) Includes 840,967 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are exercisable within 60 days after December 31, 1994.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 requires the
Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten
percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities
of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders
are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
To the Company's knowledge, based solely upon review of copies of such
reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other
reports were required, during the fiscal year ended September 25, 1994, all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Company's officers,
directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners stock were complied
with.
9.
<PAGE> 12
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION
The following table provides certain summary information concerning
compensation earned by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and each of the
three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company
(determined as of the end of the last fiscal year) for services rendered in all
capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries for the 1994, 1993 and 1992
fiscal years. Such individuals will be hereinafter referred to as the Named
Executive Officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-Term
Annual Compensation Other Compensation
------------------- Annual Awards All Other
Name and Fiscal Compensation (Options) Compen-
Principal Position Year Salary($)(1) Bonus($)(1) ($)(2)(3) (No. of Shares) sation($)(4)
------------------ ---- ------------ ----------- ---------- --------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Phillip J. Salsbury 1994 214,499 -- 62,519 400,000 362,536
President and 1993 148,843 3,588 40,588 185,208(6) --
Chief Executive 1992 152,105 -- 66,135 50,000 --
Officer(5)
Ralph J. Harms 1994 130,000 20,000 9,870 135,000 72,872
Vice President, 1993 123,982 2,949 9,328 94,370(6) --
Finance and 1992 122,351 15,000 20,157 75,000 --
Administration,
Chief Financial
Officer and
Secretary
Philip A. Ortiz 1994 100,001 -- 81,999(7) 20,000 98,560
Vice President, 1993 90,963 1,125 77,531(7) 109,728 --
Worldwide Sales 1992 100,604 -- 72,368(7) -- --
Walter P. Gebauer 1994 117,162 -- -- 100,000 --
Vice President, 1993 109,154 -- -- -- --
Manufacturing 1992 108,731 -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Includes amounts deferred under the Company's Retirement Income (401(k))
Plan.
(2) Except where otherwise specifically noted, all amounts shown in the column
"Other Annual Compensation" represent amounts reimbursed to the named
executive officers in respect of certain financial and tax preparation
services and automobile allowances.
(3) Except where otherwise specifically described in footnotes (2) and (7),
all amounts shown in the column "Other Annual Compensation" represent
amounts paid to each Named Executive Officer pursuant to the Company's
Supplemental Cash Bonus Plan. A portion of each such award was
immediately repaid to the Company in satisfaction of the accrued interest
on the outstanding promissory notes which the Named Executive Officer
delivered to the Company in payment of the exercise price of shares
purchased by that individual under the Company's 1982 Stock Option Plan,
and the remainder of the award represented a reimbursement for income
taxes payable by the Named Executive Officer with respect to the bonus
award. The bonus awards for each Named Executive Officer were as follows:
(i) for fiscal year 1994: Dr. Salsbury: $62,519, of which $39,075
represented the amount repaid to the Company as interest and $23,444
represented the tax reimbursement on the
10.
<PAGE> 13
award; Mr. Harms: $8,870, of which $5,544 represented the amount repaid to
the Company as interest and $3,326 represented the tax reimbursement on
the award; and Mr. Ortiz: $17,411, of which $10,882 represented the amount
repaid to the Company as interest and $6,529 represented the tax
reimbursement on the award; (ii) for fiscal year 1993: Dr. Salsbury:
$39,203, of which $24,502 represented the amount repaid to the Company as
interest and $14,701 represented the tax reimbursement on the award; Mr.
Harms: $7,767, of which $4,854 represented the amount repaid to the
Company as interest and $2,913 represented the tax reimbursement on the
award; and Mr. Ortiz: $11,080, of which $6,925 represented the amount
repaid to the Company as interest and $4,155 represented the tax
reimbursement on the award; (iii) for fiscal year 1992: Dr. Salsbury:
$66,135, of which $37,322 represented the amount repaid to the Company as
interest and $28,813 represented the tax reimbursement on the award; Mr.
Harms: $19,107, of which $8,110 represented the amount repaid to the
Company as interest and $10,997 represented the tax reimbursement on the
award; and Mr. Ortiz: $20,307, of which $10,763 represented amount repaid
to the Company as interest and $9,544 represented tax reimbursement on the
award. For a description of the Supplemental Cash Bonus Plan, see
"Supplemental Cash Bonus Plan" below.
(4) All amounts shown in the column "All Other Compensation" represents: (i)
the amount of forgiveness of indebtedness which the Named Executive
Officer owed to the Company under the promissory notes such Named
Executive Officer delivered in payment of the option exercise price of
certain stock options granted under the 1982 Stock Option Plan. Under the
terms of the Special Loan Forgiveness Program adopted by the Company, such
indebtedness is to be forgiven over an 18-month period beginning October
1, 1993 so long as such Named Executive Officer continues as an employee
of the Company; and (ii) the amount reimbursed to the Named Executive
Officer for the income tax liability incurred as a result of the
forgiveness of such promissory notes; provided, however, that, for
accounting purposes, the entire amount of such forgiveness and
reimbursement has been accrued as compensation expense for the 1994 fiscal
year. During fiscal 1994, the amounts forgiven and reimbursed to the
Named Executive Officers under the Special Loan Forgiveness Program were
as follows: Dr. Salsbury: $226,584 forgiven and $135,952 reimbursed; Mr.
Harms: $45,544 forgiven and $27,328 reimbursed; and Mr. Ortiz: $61,600
forgiven and $39,960 reimbursed. See "Special Loan Forgiveness Program."
(5) Dr. Salsbury was appointed to be President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company on October 1, 1993. Prior thereto, Dr. Salsbury was the
Company's Vice President and Chief Technical Officer.
(6) The options granted to the named executive officers during fiscal 1993
include options to purchase shares of common stock granted under the
Company's 1982 Stock Option Plan in replacement of the shares previously
purchased upon the exercise of options and subsequently sold by such
officers pursuant to the Company's Loan Forgiveness Program in the
following amounts: Mr. Salsbury: 110,208 shares; Mr. Harms: 19,370 shares;
and Mr. Ortiz: 29,728 shares. See "Special Loan Forgiveness Program."
(7) Includes sales commissions paid to Mr. Ortiz in the amount of $56,349,
$58,463 and $46,155 for fiscal years 1994, 1993, and 1992, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH BONUS PLAN
The Supplemental Cash Bonus Plan was implemented as a special program
to provide the Named Executive Officers with an opportunity to earn additional
compensation to be applied to the satisfaction of their outstanding
indebtedness to the Company arising from the exercise of the stock options
granted to them under the Company's 1982 Stock Option Plan. At the time when
those options were exercised, the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission applicable to short-swing trading transactions in the Company's
common stock required the officer to hold the purchased shares for at least six
months before those shares could be sold without short-swing liability. In
order to avoid liquidity problems for the Named Executive Officers, the Company
permitted the option exercise price to be paid through a promissory note. The
purchased shares were then held by the Company as security for the notes and
were to be released as the shares were sold and the proceeds applied to the
payment of the notes. During fiscal 1987 and 1988, the Company accepted
promissory notes from the following Named Executive Officers in payment of the
11.
<PAGE> 14
option exercise price for the number of shares specified for each such
individual: Dr. Salsbury: 110,208 shares at an average exercise price of $4.18
per share; Mr. Harms: 19,370 shares at an average exercise price of $4.68 per
share; and Mr. Ortiz: 29,728 shares at an average exercise price of $4.27 per
share. Accordingly, the amount of the promissory notes delivered under the
1982 Stock Option Plan in payment for the shares purchased by the Named
Executive Officers were in the following aggregate amounts: Dr. Salsbury:
$460,539; Mr. Harms: $90,748; and Mr. Ortiz: $126,831. Each promissory note is
full recourse and currently bears interest at 6% per annum. The promissory
notes were originally due and payable within three years after issuance, but
the due date for payment has been extended on several occasions, including the
recent extension to March 1995 under the terms of the Loan Forgiveness Program,
as described below. During fiscal year 1994, the amount of the outstanding
notes of each Named Executive Officer has been reduced through payments applied
to such indebtedness pursuant to the Loan Forgiveness Program.
Under the Supplemental Cash Bonus Plan, each officer of the Company
with an outstanding promissory note under the 1982 Stock Option Plan is to
receive an annual cash payment equal to the interest due and payable on his
promissory note plus an additional amount to reimburse him for the additional
income tax incurred as a result of the payment. No executive officer to whom
payments have been made under the Supplemental Cash Bonus Plan has received any
amounts thereunder in excess of the amount necessary to satisfy the interest
payment due on his promissory note and the taxes payable on the bonus. The
total amounts accrued and paid in fiscal 1994, 1993 and 1992 under the
Supplemental Cash Bonus Plan on behalf of the Named Executive Officers are
included in the Summary Compensation Table and described in footnote (3)
thereto.
SPECIAL LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAM
The Special Loan Forgiveness Program (the "Loan Forgiveness Program")
adopted by the Company was designed to achieve two primary purposes: (i)
obtain working capital for the Company and (ii) allow the Named Executive
Officers who have outstanding promissory notes under the 1982 Stock Option Plan
the opportunity to have that indebtedness forgiven over their period of
continued service with the Company. The Loan Forgiveness Program consists of
three separate components: the sale of the pledged shares and the paydown of
the promissory note, the grant of new stock options and the forgiveness of the
balance of the note over a period of future service.
Accordingly, each Named Executive Officer was required to sell all the
shares of Company's common stock securing his promissory note and to apply the
entire sale proceeds (net of sales commissions) to the partial payment of such
note. The remaining balance of the note is forgiven in six equal and
successive quarterly increments. However, unless otherwise provided by the
Company, the Named Executive Officer must continue in the Company's employ
through each forgiveness date in order to have the increment for that quarter
forgiven. If the Named Executive Officer leaves the Company's employ prior to
full forgiveness of his promissory note, then, unless otherwise provided by the
Company, the entire unpaid balance of that note will become due and payable on
the fifteenth (15th) day following such cessation of employee status.
The number of shares of the Company's common stock sold by each of the
Named Executive Officers under the Loan Forgiveness Program, the sales prices
per share, and the total net proceeds paid to the Company as a result of such
sales were as follows: Mr. Salsbury sold 52,650 shares at $1.0625 per share
and 57,567 shares at $1.15625 per share, for total net proceeds of
approximately $120,664; Mr. Ortiz sold 14,250 shares at $1.0625 per share and
15,478 shares at $1.3125 per share, for total net proceeds of approximately
$34,433; and Mr. Harms sold 9,300 shares at $1.0625 per share and 10,070 shares
at $1.1325 per share, for total net proceeds of approximately $22,431.
As the promissory note is forgiven in quarterly increments, the Named
Executive Officer receives a cash bonus as a reimbursement from the Company in
an amount equal to the Federal and state income tax liability incurred as a
result of (i) the loan forgiveness and (ii) the cash bonus. As a result, the
officer incurs no additional tax liability in connection with the forgiveness
of his promissory note. The total amounts
12.
<PAGE> 15
forgiven and reimbursed under the Loan Forgiveness Program on behalf of the
Named Executive Officers are included in the Summary Compensation Table and
described in footnote (4) thereto.
Each Named Executive Officer was granted a new stock option under the
1982 Stock Option Plan for the same number of shares of common stock as were
sold in connection with the paydown of his promissory note. The exercise price
is equal 100% of the fair market value per share of the Company's common stock
on the grant date and the option will vest on a daily basis over an 18-month
period over the officer's continued service with the Company, measured from the
grant date. Any shares purchased by the Named Executive Officer under the new
option will automatically be pledged as security for the unpaid balance of his
promissory note and will be released incrementally as that note is forgiven.
STOCK OPTIONS
The following table sets forth information concerning the stock
options granted under the 1982 Stock Option Plan during the 1994 fiscal year to
the Named Executive Officers. The table also sets forth hypothetical gains or
potential "option spreads" for those options at the end of their respective
ten-year terms. These potential realizable values are based on the assumption
that the market price of the Company's common stock will appreciate at the rate
of five percent (5%) and ten percent (10%), compounded annually, from the date
the option was granted to the last day of the full option term. The actual
value realized upon the exercise of these options, if any, will be dependent
upon the future performance of the Company's common stock and overall market
conditions. During the 1994 fiscal year, no stock appreciation rights were
granted to the Named Executive Officers.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants Potential Realizable
--------------------------------------------------------- Value at Assumed
% of Total Annual Rates of
Options Stock Price
Options Granted to Appreciation
Granted Employees Exercise for Option Term(2)
(No. of in Fiscal Price Expiration --------------------
Name Shares) Year(1) Per Share($) Date 5%($) 10%($)
---------- ------- ----------- ------------ ---------- ----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Philip J. Salsbury 75,000 5.0% 1.375 Sept. 2003 $ 64,855 $164,355
175,000 11.7% 1.375 Sept. 2003 $151,328 $383,494
50,000 3.3% 1.344 Nov. 2003 $ 42,262 $107,099
100,000 6.7% 1.250 July 2004 $ 78,612 $199,218
Ralph J. Harms 75,000 5.0% 1.344 Nov. 2003 $ 63,393 $160,649
60,000 4.0% 1.250 July 2004 $ 47,167 $119,531
Philip A. Ortiz 20,000 1.3% 1.250 July 2004 $ 15,722 $ 39,844
Walter P. Gebauer 50,000 3.3% 1.344 Nov. 2003 $ 42,262 $107,099
50,000 3.3% 1.250 July 2004 $ 39,306 $ 99,609
- -----------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1) The Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,488,265 shares of
common stock during the year ended September 25, 1994.
(2) The five percent (5%) and ten percent (10%) assumed annual rates of
compound stock price appreciation are mandated by the rules of the SEC
and do not represent the Company's estimate or a projection by the
Company of future stock prices.
(3) Represents options granted in replacement of shares sold pursuant to
the Loan Forgiveness Program. See "Loan Forgiveness Program" for a
description thereof.
13.
<PAGE> 16
STOCK OPTION EXERCISES AND HOLDINGS
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the
number of options exercised during the fiscal year ended September 25, 1994 and
the number of shares subject to exercisable and unexercisable stock options
held by the named executive officers as of September 25, 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
Value of unexercised
in-the-money options at
Shares Number of unexercised fiscal year end (market price
acquired on Value options at fiscal year-end of shares less
Name exercise realized(1) (No. of Shares) exercise price)($)(2)(3)
------ ----------- ----------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------
Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
----------- ------------- ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Phillip J. Salsbury -- -- 410,713 363,316 $13,751 $ 25
Ralph J. Harms -- -- 57,871 71,857 $ 5,160 $3,556
Philip A. Ortiz -- -- 132,936 151,976 $ 2,421 --
Walter P. Gebauer -- -- 49,567 85,433 -- --
-----------------------
</TABLE>
(1) The "value realized" represents the difference between the base (or
exercise) price of the option shares and the market price of the
option shares on the date the option was exercised. The value
realized was determined without considering any taxes which may have
been owed.
(2) "In-the-money" options are options whose base (or exercise) price was
less than the market price of common stock at September 25, 1994.
(3) Assuming a stock price of $1.125 per share, which was the closing
price of a share of the Company's common stock reported on the
Nasdaq National Market on September 25, 1994.
COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation and Stock Option Committees of the Board of Directors
(the "Committees") administer the Company's compensation policies and programs.
The Compensation Committee makes and reviews recommendations regarding the
Company's compensation policies and executive compensation, including setting
the base salaries of the Company's executive officers, approving individual
bonuses and bonus programs for executive officers, and administering certain of
the Company's stock option and other employee benefit plans. The Stock Option
Committee is solely responsible for administering the Company's 1982 Stock
Option Plan, under which grants may be made to executive officers and other key
employees. The following is a summary of policies of the Committees that
affect the compensation paid to executive officers, as reflected in the tables
and text set forth elsewhere in this proxy statement.
GENERAL COMPENSATION POLICY. The overall policy of the Committees is
to offer the Company's executive officers competitive compensation
opportunities based upon their personal performance, the financial performance
of the Company and their contribution to that performance. One of the primary
objectives is to have a substantial portion of each executive officer's
compensation contingent upon the Company's performance as well as upon such
executive officer's own level of performance. Each executive officer's
compensation package is generally comprised of three elements: (i) base salary,
which reflects an individual's position and responsibilities, as well as past
performance, and is generally designed primarily
14.
<PAGE> 17
to be competitive with the salary levels of the Company's competitors in the
semiconductor industry, (ii) annual variable performance awards payable in cash
and tied to the achievement of annual performance goals, and (iii) long-term
stock-based incentive awards designed to strengthen the mutuality of interests
between the executive officers and the Company's stockholders. Generally, as
an executive officer's level of responsibility increases, a greater portion of
such executive officer's total compensation will be dependent upon Company
performance and stock price appreciation rather than base salary.
FACTORS. Several important factors considered in establishing the
components of each executive officer's compensation package for the 1994 fiscal
year are summarized below. Additional factors were taken into account to a
lesser degree. The Committees may in their discretion apply entirely different
factors, such as different measures of financial performance, for future fiscal
years. However, it is currently contemplated that all compensation decisions
will be designed to further the overall compensation policy described above.
BASE SALARY. The base salary for each officer is primarily
set on the basis of personal performance and internal comparability
considerations, and, to a lesser extent, on the financial performance of the
Company. Because of the Company's financial performance over the past three
fiscal years, the base salary levels of the executive officers have not
increased significantly above the levels in effect for the 1992 fiscal year,
except to compensate them for the promotions and the accompanying additional
responsibilities assumed by Dr. Salsbury, Mr. Harms and Mr. Gebauer.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION. For the 1994 fiscal year, a
bonus program was established under which each executive officer could earn a
series of quarterly bonuses on the basis of the Company's pre-tax profits for
each fiscal quarter. Under the program, a specified portion of the pre-tax
profits for each quarter was to be reserved for allocation to all individuals
employed by the Company at the end of that quarter. The amount allocated to
each employee was to be based upon such employee's salary for that quarter, and
the allocated amount was to be paid out at the end of each quarter. The
amounts paid to each executive officer under the program were not substantial
and ranged from a high of $20,000 to a low of $0 for the entire 1994 fiscal
year. For prior fiscal years, the bonuses payable to executive officers were
based primarily on individual performance and were not tied to Company
performance.
LONG-TERM STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION. Generally, the
Stock Option Committee approves annual grants of stock options to each of the
Company's executive officers under the 1982 Stock Option Plan. The grants are
designed to align the interests of each executive officer with those of the
stockholders and provide each individual with a significant incentive to manage
the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the
business. Each grant generally allows the officer to acquire shares of the
Company's common stock at a fixed price per share (the market price on the
grant date) over a specified period of time (up to 10 years), thus providing a
return to the executive officer only if the market price of the shares
appreciates over the option term and the officer continues in the Company's
employ. The size of the option grant to each executive officer is designed to
create a meaningful opportunity for stock ownership based upon the executive
officer's current position with the Company, internal comparability with option
grants made to other Company executives, the executive officer's current level
of performance and the executive officer's potential for future responsibility
and promotion over the option term. The Stock Option Committee also takes into
account the number of vested and unvested options held by the executive officer
in order to maintain an appropriate level of equity incentive for that
individual. However, the Stock Option Committee does not adhere to any
specific guidelines as to the relative option holdings of the Company's
executive officers. In fiscal year 1994, larger than normal option grants were
made to the executive officers to compensate for the lack of any significant
increase in their base salaries, to compensate them for their promotions and
the accompanying additional promotions, and to make their total compensation
more dependent upon future appreciation in the market price of the Company's
common stock.
15.
<PAGE> 18
CEO COMPENSATION. In setting the compensation payable to Mr.
Salsbury, the Company's Chief Executive Officer during fiscal 1994, the
Compensation Committee sought to be competitive with the Company's competitors
in the semiconductor industry, while at the same time tying a significant
percentage of such compensation to Company performance and stock price
appreciation. The Compensation Committee established Mr. Salsbury's base
salary for fiscal 1994 with the intent to provide him with a minimum level of
compensation not tied to any significant degree to Company performance factors.
The incentive bonus component of Mr. Salsbury's compensation for the
1994 fiscal year was dependent primarily upon the Company's pre-tax quarterly
profits and provided no dollar guarantees. No bonus was earned by Mr.
Salsbury during fiscal 1994 on the basis of this performance factor. However,
as described above, Mr. Salsbury also participated in the Supplemental Cash
Bonus Plan and the Loan Forgiveness Program, along with other executive
officers of the Company, and earned compensation under those programs solely on
the basis of his continued employment.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee and Stock Option Committee of
the Board of Directors:
Alan V. Gregory, Member, Compensation and Stock Option Committees
Charles C. Harwood, Member, Compensation and Stock Option Committees
Phillip J. Salsbury, Member, Compensation Committee
COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Dr. Salsbury, a member of the Company's Board of Directors and the
Compensation Committee, is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company.
No executive officer of the Company serves as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any entity which has one or more
executive officers serving as a member of the Company's Board of Directors or
Compensation Committee.
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS
Effective October 1, 1993, Mr. J. Daniel McCranie resigned from his
positions as the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
after serving as an employee of the Company in various positions since 1981.
In connection with Mr. McCranie's resignation, the Company entered into a
separation agreement with Mr. McCranie which, among other things, provided for
certain payments and other financial compensation. Pursuant to the separation
agreement, Mr. McCranie agreed to remain a director of the Company and to act
as a consultant to the Company for a period of one year after the effective
date of his resignation. Pursuant to the separation agreement, the Company
agreed to pay to Mr. McCranie a $50,000 bonus for services rendered during
fiscal 1993, and paid him $26,550 as salary continuation pay for a limited
period after the effective date of his resignation. The Company also provided
continued health coverage to Mr. McCranie for this period. The Company agreed
to accelerate the vesting of stock options previously granted to Mr. McCranie
so that such options became vested as of the effective date of his resignation
with respect to all shares that such options would have become vested had he
continued as an employee of the Company through September 30, 1994. The
Company also agreed to extend the period during which Mr. McCranie is entitled
to exercise his options through September 30, 1994. The Company also agreed to
forgive the full amount of all outstanding indebtedness incurred by Mr.
McCranie under the deferred payment arrangements of the 1982 Stock Option Plan
and to reimburse Mr. McCranie for increased taxes payable by him as a result of
such forgiveness, all in accordance with the terms of the Loan Forgiveness
Program previously adopted by the Company. The principal amount of
indebtedness subject to forgiveness under the terms of the separation agreement
was $413,275. See "Loan Forgiveness Program."
16.
<PAGE> 19
Effective March 4, 1994, Mr. Michael E. Villott resigned from his
position as the Company's Vice President, Marketing after serving as an
employee of the Company in various positions since 1982. In connection with
Mr. Villott's resignation, the Company entered into a separation agreement with
Mr. Villott which, among other things, provided for certain payments and other
financial compensation. Pursuant to the separation agreement, the Company
agreed to pay Mr. Villott $30,480, which represented a payment of one week of
salary at Mr. Villott's then-current base salary for each of the twelve years
he served as an employee of the Company. The Company also agreed to forgive
the full amount of all outstanding indebtedness incurred by Mr. Villott under
the deferred payment arrangements of the 1982 Stock Option Plan and to continue
to make payments to Mr. Villott in accordance with the terms of the Loan
Forgiveness Program in an amount equal to the amount of bonus Mr. Villott would
have been entitled to under such program. The principal amount of indebtedness
subject to forgiveness under the terms of the separation agreement was
$95,058. See "Loan Forgiveness Program."
In July 1987, the Company's Board of Directors adopted a special
Severance Pay Program for the benefit of its executive officers. Under the
program, a participant who voluntarily terminates such participant's employment
within 12 months following a change in control of the Company will remain as a
consultant to the Company for a maximum of six months following such
termination of employment. For each month during the period the participant is
available to provide consulting services, the Company will pay the participant
1/12th of such participant's then current annual compensation (i.e., annualized
base salary for the year plus the amount of any commissions, cash bonuses and
deferred compensation for the prior year). A participant whose employment is
involuntarily terminated within 18 months of a change in control will receive a
lump sum severance payment equal to 1.5 times such participant's then current
annual compensation. Under the program, full vesting of all outstanding stock
options may also occur upon certain changes in control, and the participants
will have the right, in the event of a hostile change in control, to surrender
their options for a cash distribution equal to the difference between the
aggregate fair market value of the shares purchasable under their options and
the aggregate exercise price payable for such shares ("limited stock
appreciation rights"). Under no circumstances may the aggregate value of the
payments and benefits under the program exceed three times the participant's
average W-2 wages for the five calendar years immediately preceding the
calendar year in which the change in control occurs. For purposes of the
program, a change in control will occur in the event of (i) a
stockholder-approved merger or acquisition of the Company in which 50% or more
of the Company's outstanding voting stock is transferred to different holders,
(ii) the acquisition of 25% or more of the Company's outstanding voting stock
pursuant to a tender or exchange offer which the Company's Board of Directors
does not recommend the stockholders of the Company accept, or (iii) a change in
the composition of the Board of Directors which results in members of the Board
who were elected at the last uncontested election of Board members ceasing to
comprise a majority of the Board by reason of a contested election. Each of
the named executive officers is a participant in the Severance Pay Program.
Under the terms of the 1982 Stock Option Plan, an officer or director
subject to the short-swing profit trading restrictions of the Federal
securities laws may be granted a limited right to surrender an option upon the
occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the 1982 Stock Option Plan).
Such a limited right will not require the approval of the Board of Directors or
any committee thereof and will be paid in cash. For purposes of computing the
appreciation distribution payable on a limited right, the fair market value of
the shares subject to the surrendered option will be the greater of (i) the
fair market value of such shares on the date of surrender (as determined in
accordance with the valuation provisions of the 1982 Stock Option Plan) or (ii)
the highest reported price per share paid by the acquiring entity in effecting
the change in control. For these purposes, a "change in control" will be
deemed to occur should either of the following occur: (i) a person or related
group of persons, other than the Company or a person that directly or
indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the
Company, acquire (i) twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the outstanding
common stock pursuant to a tender or exchange offer which the Board of
Directors does not recommend the stockholders to accept or (ii) fifty percent
(50%) or more of the Company's outstanding common stock in a single transaction
or in a series of related transactions (other than a "corporate transaction"
(as such term is defined in the 1982 Stock Option Plan)), or (ii) there occurs
a change in the composition of the Board of Directors such that the individuals
elected to the Board at the
17.
<PAGE> 20
last stockholder meeting at which there is not a contested election
subsequently cease to comprise a majority of the Board by reason of a contested
election for Board membership. Each of the named executive officers is a
participant in the 1983 Stock Option Plan and, as a result, is eligible to
benefit from these provisions.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on
the common stock of the Company with that of the S&P 500 Stock Index, a broad
market index published by the Standard & Poor's Corporation, and the H&Q
Semiconductor Index, a semiconductor company stock index published by Hambrecht
& Quist Incorporated. The comparison for each of the periods assumes that $100
was invested on September 30, 1989 in the Company's common stock, the stocks
included in the S&P 500 Stock Index and the stocks included in the H&Q
Semiconductor Index. These indices, which reflect formulas for dividend
reinvestment and weighting of individual stocks, do not necessarily reflect
returns that could be achieved by individual investors.
18.
<PAGE> 21
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
9/30/89 9/30/90 9/30/91 9/30/92 9/30/93 9/30/94
SEEQ $100 $ 36 $ 47 $ 24 $ 33 $ 26
S&P 500 $100 $ 91 $119 $132 $149 $155
H&Q Semiconductor $100 $ 85 $112 $163 $346 $356
</TABLE>
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the
Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that might incorporate future
filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the preceding
Compensation and Stock Option Committee Report on Executive Compensation and
the preceding Company Stock Performance Graph shall not be incorporated by
reference into any such filings; nor shall such Report or Graph be incorporated
by reference into any future filings.
PROPOSAL NO. 2:
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Company is asking the stockholders to ratify the selection of Price
Waterhouse LLP as the Company's independent public accountants for the fiscal
year ending September 24, 1995. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the shares represented and voting at the Annual Meeting will be
required to ratify the selection of Price Waterhouse LLP.
In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors will consider it as a direction to select
other auditors for the subsequent year. Even if the selection is ratified, the
Board in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent
accounting firm at any time during the year if the Board determines that such a
change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.
Price Waterhouse LLP has audited the Company's financial statements
annually since its inception. Its representatives are expected to be present
at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they
desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE
SELECTION OF PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 24, 1995.
19.
<PAGE> 22
OTHER BUSINESS
The Board of Directors knows of no other business that will be
presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If other matters are
properly brought before the Annual Meeting, however, it is the intention of the
persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote the shares represented thereby
on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals of stockholders that are intended to be presented at the
Company's annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 1996 must be received by
October 18, 1995 in order to be included in the proxy statement and proxy
relating to that meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors
RALPH J. HARMS
Secretary
February 15, 1995
20.
<PAGE> 23
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.
PHILLIP J. SALSBURY and RALPH J. HARMS, or either of them, are hereby
appointed as the lawful agents and proxies of the undersigned (with all powers
the undersigned would possess if personally present, including full power of
substitution) to represent and to vote all shares of capital stock of SEEQ
Technology Incorporated (the "Company") which the undersigned is entitled to
vote at the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders on March 23, 1995, and at
any adjournments or postponements thereof as follows:
(Please Sign and Date the Proxy on the Reverse Side)
_______________________________________________________________________________
[x] Please mark your votes as in this example.
1. Election of Directors as described in the Proxy Statement:
[ ] FOR [ ] AUTHORIZATION WITHHELD
NOMINEES: Alan V. Gregory Charles C. Harwood
Phillip J. Salsbury Peter C. Chen
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write
such name or names in the space provided below.)
________________________________________________________________
2. Proposal to ratify the appointment of Price Waterhouse LLP as independent
accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending September 24, 1995.
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
3. Transaction of any other business which may properly come before the
meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the above
proposals. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS
INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE PROPOSALS AND, AT THE DISCRETION
OF THE PERSONS NAMED AS PROXIES, UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME
BEFORE THE MEETING. This proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY
USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Signature________________ Date_______ Signature_______________ Date_______
NOTE: (Please sign exactly as shown on your stock certificate and on the
envelope in which this proxy was mailed. When signing as partner,
corporate officer, attorney, executor, administrator, trustee,
guardian or in any other representative capacity, give full title as
such and sign your own name as well. If stock is held jointly, each
joint owner should sign.)
<PAGE> 24
EVENTS DURING 1994
- Improved balance sheet by over $10 million through the sale of
non-volatile memory assets.
- Restructured and down-sized the company to specialize 100% on datacom
products for local area networks.
- Achieved qualification and delivered volume production of custom-designed
Ethernet Transceivers to Apple Computer.
- Realigned and reinforced wafer foundry relationships to support datacom
product line.
- Returned to profitability in second half '94.
- Increased quarterly sales from datacom products by 87% from Q4 '93 to Q4
'94.
- Intensified product development focus on the emerging Fast Ethernet and
ATM markets.
- Introduced the 84C300 four-port 100 Mbps controller, the first member of
our new Hurricane(TM) Fast Ethernet product family.
- In a subsequent event, subleased current headquarters facility and
secured new, smaller building for occupancy in early '95.
[PHOTO]
SEEQ's 84C300 provides four independent ports that can each operate at data
rates up to 200 Mbps in Full Duplex mode.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
<PAGE> 25
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND THE CEO
INTRODUCTION
The fiscal year 1994 was one of dramatic change and progress for SEEQ
Technology. The first half of the year was dominated by the sale of the
company's EEPROM assets, and by the associated restructuring and re-aligning
required to forge a new company focused entirely on the datacom market. The
second half brought the first results from the re-engineered organization,
highlighted by a return to profitability and by the introduction of a new family
of products targeted at emerging high speed datacom networks.
The EEPROM asset sale in February, 1994 signaled a turning point for SEEQ. This
transaction strengthened our balance sheet and allowed us to accelerate our
transition to becoming a datacom-only company. Following this transaction we
substantially reduced our operating costs while driving up sales from our
datacom products. As a result, the company recorded a profit of $.04 per share
for the second half of the year, on revenues that were substantially less than
those posted for the comparable prior-year period.
On the manufacturing front, operations were simplified and streamlined. Wafer
foundry relationships were strengthened with IMP, Rohm and Ricoh, and ASIC
supply agreements were put in place with VLSI and Samsung.
Within R&D, we redoubled our efforts to expand our line of 10 Mbps Ethernet
components and to push ahead with advanced Fast Ethernet and Asynchronous
Transfer Mode (ATM) products. During the year we reaped the first results from
these efforts. New product introductions included a new line of Ethernet media
interface adapters and, of special significance, the first member of SEEQ's
Hurricane(TM) Fast Ethernet product family.
[PHOTO]
EM2 Thinnet Ethernet Transceiver with
On-Board Isolation and Power Supply
Events of the past year transformed the Company into a "really new" SEEQ - a
smaller but highly focused company specializing in the rapidly developing
datacom marketplace. We are proud of our accomplishments during this year of
rapid transition, and are enthusiastic over the potential of our datacom
strategy.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
<PAGE> 26
SEEQ'S FOUNDRY NETWORK
SEEQ's foundry partners are vital to our manufacturing strategy. As a fabless
semiconductor company, we depend on these partners for strength in wafer
processing and, in some cases, turn-key manufacturing. We believe that solid,
long term foundry relationships are essential to maintaining an adequate supply
of our proprietary products. We have selected our foundry sources based on their
ability to manufacture leading-edge processes at a fair price while achieving
consistent yields, high quality and dependable output.
Changes occurring within our foundry network reflect the overall transition of
SEEQ. The total number of wafer foundries was reduced to three - IMP, Rohm, and
Ricoh - where relationships were strengthened and activity re-targeted to our
proprietary datacom processes. This rapid change-over was achieved through close
cooperation with the foundries and strong engineering efforts from our own
engineering team, as well as from their foundry counterparts. Significantly,
these combined efforts were successful in maintaining our flow of datacom wafers
throughout the second half of the year, in spite of an untimely cut-off of
supply by one of our former foundries.
[PHOTO]
SEEQ's Foundry Partners
In addition to reinforcing our strategic sources of wafer-based products, supply
agreements were established with VLSI Technology and Samsung for our logic
products. We have designed these products using an ASIC-like methodology, and we
depend on these suppliers for turn-key manufacturing using either a standard
cell or a gate array approach.
We view the "win-win" relationships with these wafer-based and ASIC-based
suppliers as important assets of our company. Together, we believe these
suppliers can provide us with the capacity that we need for our current
products, and also provide us with the advanced sub-micron processing capability
required for our future products, both analog and digital.
[PHOTO]
80C04A 10Mbps AutoDUPLEX
Ethernet Data Link Controller
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
<PAGE> 27
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The most singular financial event of the past year occurred with the sale of the
company's non-volatile memory assets, significantly increasing liquidity and
setting the stage for a return to profitability in the second half.
During the second fiscal quarter SEEQ sold its non-volatile memory business and
all associated assets to the Atmel Corporation for $10.0M. This transaction
improved cash, reduced equipment lease obligations, and resulted in a
significant improvement in the balance sheet. Following this event, we adopted a
restructuring plan consistent with our new focus on the datacom market. As part
of that plan, we reduced the number of employees to 70 (down from 165 at the end
of 1993), eliminated certain facilities, and drove down our operating costs. In
a separate event, we discontinued our low-margin end-user Ethernet adapter board
products.
These events set the stage for a return to profitability in the second half of
the year. For the entire fiscal year 1994, we reported revenues of $21.5
million, a 35% decrease from the previous year's $33.0 million. On the bottom
line, we recorded a loss of $7.9 million, of which $4.8 million were costs
associated with restructuring. None of these numbers are cause for celebration.
[PHOTO]
SEEQ's new Corporate Headquarters in Fremont California.
However, for the second half of the fiscal year the "New SEEQ" generated a net
income of $0.9 million, or $0.04 per share. And even though total company sales
were below the 1993 level, sales for the datacom-only segment actually increased
87% from Q4'93 to Q4'94. This growth resulted primarily from increasing volumes
on our coax transceiver, achieving volume production on our CMOS controllers,
plus the turn-on of the Apple transceiver business. For the year, datacom sales
increased 13% over corresponding 1993 results.
At year's end, cash stood at $2.3 million, an increase of $1.6 million over the
previous year. Liquidity and capital resources also improved from the prior
year, thanks to a $5.0 million bank line of credit, restricted to eligible
accounts receivable, from The CIT Group and to $5.0 million from the memory
asset sale (held in two escrow accounts). Furthermore, in an event subsequent to
fiscal 1994, we subleased our under-utilized headquarters facility and leased a
smaller building, thereby cutting in half our facility expenses going forward in
1995.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
<PAGE> 28
In summary, during 1994 we strengthened the balance sheet, positioned the
company for profitability, and achieved profitability in the second half.
Increases in datacom sales for the year suggests that we are on the right track
with our business strategy. As a result of our accomplishments in 1994, we
believe that we have the financial resources to meet our needs for the
foreseeable future.
PRODUCTS POSITIONED IN THE DATACOM MARKET
The datacom marketplace is a growing, rapidly evolving environment. It is driven
by customers' need to exchange computer data in ever increasing amounts at ever
increasing speeds across networks of ever increasing complexity. Networking
itself has become a household word, popularized by the enormous publicity
surrounding the Internet, and by countless media references to "navigating the
Information Superhighway".
SEEQ today is a fabless semiconductor company specializing in this datacom
marketplace. Our products focus on the network connection, and provide the
"silicon solutions" required to connect a computer product (like a PC, printer,
hub, router, . . . ) to a local area network. We believe that SEEQ brings a
combination of experience and expertise that positions us to serve this network
connectivity market segment in a particularly effective way.
In 1982, SEEQ pioneered connectivity solutions for Ethernet Local Area Networks
(LAN's). During that year, SEEQ developed and introduced the industry's first
Ethernet data link controller, working in strategic partnership with 3Com.
Today, SEEQ offers a broad range of connectivity solutions for networking
hardware such as
TYPICAL LAN (LOCAL AREA NETWORK) CONFIGURATION
[FIGURE 1]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5
<PAGE> 29
bridges, routers, switching hubs, network printers, network analyzers and
adapter cards. Customers include 3Com, Apple Computer, Cabletron, Cisco, Compaq,
Hewlett Packard, Intel Systems, Tektronix and Xircom.
SEEQ's served market spans the entire range of applications represented in the
LAN configuration shown on page 5. SEEQ's products are targeted to the large
installed base of standard 10 million-bits-per-second (Mbps) Ethernet LAN's as
well as the emerging high speed networks like 100 Mbps Fast Ethernet and ATM.
The market size for Ethernet only connectivity components has been growing
throughout the last decade, and is estimated to be over $600 million in 1995. Of
special significance for our new products, the emerging Fast Ethernet segment is
estimated to be $100 million for the same period.
One of SEEQ's primary goals is to provide our customers with highly integrated
products whose features and performance bring added value and lower overall
system cost. This year we ramped volume production our new generation 80C03 and
80C04 controllers for bridge, router, hub, and printer applications. Both
products offer low power CMOS technology and increased network performance,
while providing a seamless migration path from older products. We also
introduced three new Media Interface Adapters (MIA) for the 10 Mbps market.
These new MIA's implement SEEQ's patented AutoDUPLEX(TM) feature for 20 Mbps
performance, as well as on-chip waveshaping for lower system cost. With the
introduction of these devices, SEEQ became the industry's first supplier to
offer complete component solutions for Full Duplex Ethernet.
PROJECTED MARKET GROWTH OF ETHERNET CONNECTIVITY COMPONENTS
TOTAL AVAILABLE MARKET
($ in Millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FAST ETHERNET
-------------
1994 1995 1996 1997
- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
100 150 300 400
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL ETHERNET
-------------
1994 1995 1996 1997
- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
590 650 1,000 1,300
</TABLE>
Source: Composite IDC & SEEQ
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6
<PAGE> 30
[PHOTO]
ZeitNet Ethernet adapter card for PCI bus, utilizing the 84C300 Hurricane 4-Port
Controller and four 80C24 AutoDUPLEX MIAs.
In a separate and much-followed event, we began shipments of Ethernet
Transceiver units to Apple Computer in March '94. This event marked the
successful completion of rigorous qualification testing at Apple, and the
beginning of shipments to Apple that continued throughout the balance of 1994.
These shipments represent a significant achievement for SEEQ, particularly in
the disciplines of Engineering and Quality.
In September 1994, SEEQ introduced the first member of our Fast Ethernet
Hurricane(TM) family, a four-port 100 Mbps controller called the 84C300. This
controller, the first of its kind in the industry, allows customers to integrate
10/100 Mbps functionality into their multi-port products, and provides easy
migration to Fast Ethernet.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND R&D
SEEQ's new product developments hold the keys to our future growth. Early in
1994, we redoubled our efforts to expand our line of 10 Mbps Ethernet components
and to push ahead with advanced products for the emerging 100 Mbps Ethernet
market. During the year we maintained R&D spending at 1993 levels despite the
downsizing of the company. As a result, R&D spending as a percentage of sales
grew to over 15% in 1994, up from 10% in 1993. Later in 1994, we reaped the
first results from these efforts with the product introductions described in the
paragraphs above.
Our R&D strengths flow from a blending of process and device experience, forged
over our thirteen years of history as a semiconductor manufacturer, together
with state-of-the-art digital and mixed-signal design expertise. This strength
is then focused by careful listening to customers' application needs, and
sharpened by a sense of urgency and an understanding of the importance of
time-to-market.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
<PAGE> 31
Within the industry, SEEQ is committed to open standards for compliant products,
and we feel an obligation to protect our customers' investments with
economically justifiable upgrade paths. To achieve this goal, SEEQ actively
participates in key industry alliances, and is currently an active contributing
member in the Fast Ethernet Alliance, the Full Duplex Switched Ethernet
Alliance, and the Desktop ATM25 Alliance. Within this framework, SEEQ is working
to introduce next-generation products which will offer customers an easy path to
100 Mbps Fast Ethernet, while insuring backward compatibility to existing legacy
10 Mbps Ethernet LANs.
Our goal is to be a leading supplier of connectivity products for our customers.
In pursuing this goal, we are dedicated to providing complete connectivity
solutions for local area networks of each generation.
CONCLUSION
The datacom marketplace is growing rapidly, and we believe that we are
well-positioned to serve this market. Events of 1994, led by the sale of our
non-volatile memory assets, accelerated our transition to becoming a
datacom-only company. We are excited over the potential of our new strategy, and
draw encouragement from our accomplishments of 1994. We closed 1994 with a
stronger financial balance sheet, a restructured company, a focused new product
strategy and a new family of products ready to launch. We thank our customers
for their business, our shareholders for their interest and patience, our
employees for their hard work and enthusiasm and our suppliers for their
partnership - all during a year of rapid transition. We look upon 1994 with a
sense of progress, and look forward to 1995 with optimism.
/s/ P.J. SALSBURY
- ------------------------
Dr. Phillip Salsbury
CEO and President
/s/ ALAN V. GREGORY
- ------------------------
Alan V. Gregory,
Board Chairman
[PHOTO]
Left: Alan V. Gregory, Board Chairman
Right: Dr. Phillip Salsbury, CEO and President
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8
<PAGE> 32
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
/X/ Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1994
OR
/ / Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission File Number 0-11778
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 94-2711298
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
47131 Bayside Pkwy., Fremont, California 94538
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (510) 226-7400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01
par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. /X/
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant, based upon the closing price of the Common Stock on December 21,
1994 as reported by Nasdaq, was approximately $22,513,043.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant's Common Stock on December
21, 1994 was 25,829,192.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(1) Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders as filed
with the Commission (the "Proxy Statement") - Part III, Items 10, 11, 12
and 13.
9
<PAGE> 33
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
SEEQ Technology Incorporated (herein "SEEQ" or the "Company") is a leading
supplier of Ethernet data communications products for networking applications.
The Company was founded in 1981 to develop, manufacture and market products
incorporating metal-oxide-silicon ("MOS") reprogrammable, nonvolatile memory
integrated circuit technology. In 1983, the Company successfully developed the
industry's first integrated Ethernet data communications controller in
cooperation with 3COM Corporation. The Company combines its strengths in digital
circuit and analog design with its communications systems expertise to produce
mixed-signal data communication solutions that provide increased functionality
and greater reliability and that result in lower total system cost. In February
1994, the Company sold its nonvolatile memory technology and related assets to
focus on the data communications market.
SEEQ has applied its advanced proprietary complementary metal oxide silicon
("CMOS") process technology to build media signaling integrated circuits for
data communication applications. SEEQ's product development and marketing
strategy is to target its products for sale to rapidly growing systems
manufacturers in the high growth personal computer, workstation, printer,
networking and telecommunication markets. SEEQ intends to target new and
existing systems manufacturers who are performance and volume leaders in these
markets. SEEQ's complete product line includes Ethernet data communication
controllers, AutoDUPLEXTM Ethernet chip sets for automatic full duplex switched
Ethernet applications, encoders/decoders, coaxial cable CMOS transceivers and
unshielded twisted pair cable CMOS transceivers, and networking modules. The
Company also designs media signaling integrated circuits for the emerging high
speed local area network ("LAN") markets including Fast Ethernet and
Asynchronous Transfer Mode ("ATM").
The Company's more than 125 customers worldwide include such personal
computer, workstation and data communication industry leaders as Apple Computer,
Cisco Systems, Hewlett Packard, 3COM, Cabletron, Compaq, and Silicon Graphics.
SEEQ's Ethernet data communications products are sold in all market applications
of Ethernet adapter cards, workstations, media attachment units, print servers,
file servers, multiport repeaters, standard hubs, switching hubs, bridges and
routers.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Corporate computing networks during the late 1960s and 1970s were
characterized by expensive computer resources which were concentrated in a
central location and accessed by remote display terminals. As the declining cost
of computing power made distributed data processing possible, LANs developed in
the early 1980s which provided departmental level processing in the form of
powerful small personal computers ("PCs") and microprocessor-based workstations.
LANs are used at the departmental level for information exchange among the local
computers and sharing of peripherals.
Although the computer industry initially favored proprietary LAN solutions,
a cooperative effort between computer and communications vendors under the
sponsorship of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers ("IEEE")
resulted in several LAN protocol standards including Ethernet and Token Ring.
These standard-based LANs provide a local shared communications facility which
can be accessed by products from multiple vendors, even though the higher level
protocols for these products may be incompatible. Under these standards, the
installation of LANs has expanded significantly, with over half of the worldwide
PCs now connected to some form of LAN.
The PC LAN network consists of the following three major hardware elements
allowing data communication through a network operating system: network
interface cards ("NICs"), physical media transfer communication hardware and
file servers. The NIC is the hardware which allows a PC or workstation to link
via the physical media of transmission to the other network users and
peripherals. The physical media transfer communication hardware are the
connectors used to connect the NICs to the network and the type of wire or
transmission media used through the LAN. The choices of wiring include thick and
thin Ethernet cable, shielded and unshielded twisted pair (telephone cable), and
fiber optic cabling. The use of the growing installed base of twisted-pair
copper telephone lines is expected to remain the primary means for local
connectivity to the
10
<PAGE> 34
information superhighway. Currently, unshielded twisted-pair copper wire is the
most cost-effective means of transmitting information at the data rates
typically required for local connectivity. Systems original equipment
manufacturers ("OEMs") must address the technological limitation of twisted-pair
copper wire, the leading transmission medium, while rapidly reacting to evolving
industry protocols and standards.
Demand for LAN products has grown rapidly in recent years, as a result of
the growth in corporate networks, the introduction of client/server computing,
the expansion of personal computer and workstation markets, and the development
of new applications, including video conferencing, image processing and
multimedia. As networks grow in size and these new applications require faster
and faster data rates, business networks will require more throughput capacity
than is currently provided by current implementations such as 10 megabit per
second ("Mbps") Ethernet or 16Mbps Token Ring. Over the next several years,
high-speed network connection requirements will move beyond current areas of
deployment such as network servers and LAN interconnects and extend to include
desktop PCs. A new class of LAN interconnect devices called switching hubs have
recently emerged to address these needs.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
SEEQ's objective is to be a leading provider of digital and mixed-signal
silicon "connectivity" solutions for data communication applications. Key
elements of the Company's business strategy include the following:
IDENTIFY FAST GROWING SYSTEMS MANUFACTURERS IN TARGET MARKETS
SEEQ's marketing strategy is to identify fast growing applications and OEM
customers in the high growth personal computer, workstation, printer, data
communication applications and telecommunication markets. SEEQ's products are
designed to satisfy the requirements of the customer's application and to bring
added value to the end product. The Company encourages close contact with its
customers in pursuing this strategy.
DEVELOP PRODUCTS TARGETED AT SPECIALIZED MARKETS WITH PROPRIETARY
TECHNOLOGIES
A key element of SEEQ's strategy is to develop and market a variety of
products which are individually targeted at specialized markets but which
together address a large aggregate market. SEEQ's proprietary technologies and
its focus on specialized markets have made the Company the sole source supplier
of a number of its products. This result provides SEEQ with a number of
opportunities for value pricing these products, and enables a close working
relationship with OEM customers to develop products to be incorporated into
future systems being developed by those OEMs.
EXTEND STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS WITH INDUSTRY LEADERS
SEEQ continues to work closely with systems manufacturers that are market
and technology leaders, which in selected cases has led to strategic sole-source
supplier arrangements. At the heart of customer relationships, the applications
team at the Company focuses on meeting a customer's specific system
requirements. In addition, the Company plays an active role in industry-wide
alliances aimed at developing standards for new LAN technologies. SEEQ is a
contributing member of the Fast Ethernet Alliance, Full Duplex Switched Ethernet
Consortium and the Desktop ATM25 Alliance.
CAPITALIZE ON MIXED-SIGNAL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS EXPERTISE
The Company has assembled a talented group of engineers possessing both
mixed-signal integrated circuit and communications systems design skills. SEEQ
believes that its design staff is one of the leading mixed-signal design teams
in the industry and represents one of the Company's core competitive strengths.
The Company's strategy is to utilize its process development and LAN technology
expertise, together with its manufacturing knowledge, to supply highly
integrated connectivity solutions at lower system cost than competitors'
products.
11
<PAGE> 35
INTEGRATE COMPONENTS INTO SUBSYSTEMS
The Company's strategy is to use its circuit and process technology
knowledge to develop both integrated circuits and subsystems for use in data
communication applications. In the development of subsystems, SEEQ intends to
make significant use of integrated circuit products developed by SEEQ. In
maintaining the ownership of critical semiconductor technology in these
subsystems, SEEQ believes this will provide certain competitive advantages based
on time-to-market, product features and lower product costs.
EXPAND ETHERNET PRODUCT LINE AND CUSTOMER BASE
The Company is committed to the introduction of new data communication
products into existing and new high-speed LAN market segments (such as Fast
Ethernet and ATM), which enable system OEMs to improve performance, address new
applications and further integrate higher levels of system functionality which
meet industry standards. The Company's existing line of Ethernet products enable
SEEQ to provide a full range of LAN data communication solutions to its
customers. The Company's more than 125 customers worldwide include such personal
computer, workstation and data communication industry leaders as Apple Computer,
Cisco Systems, Hewlett Packard, 3COM, Cabletron, Compaq, and Silicon Graphics.
SEEQ's Ethernet products are sold in all market applications of Ethernet adapter
cards, workstations, media attachment units, print servers, file servers,
multiport repeaters, standard hubs, switching hubs, bridges and routers.
MAINTAIN COST-EFFECTIVE SILICON FOUNDRY RELATIONSHIPS
SEEQ maintains the necessary supply of finished wafers to meet its
manufacturing needs through selective foundry arrangements with major
semiconductor manufacturers. These agreements are intended to provide SEEQ with
the required wafer fabrication capacity, and to provide the Company with access
to next generation silicon process technology. The Company currently has such
agreements with International Microelectronics Products, Exel and Ricoh. The
Company also has supply agreements with VLSI Technology and Samsung.
PRODUCTS
Electronic data communication is one of the largest and fastest growing
segments of the integrated electronics market. LANs, representing networks
connecting two or more computers and peripherals within a localized geographical
area (e.g., office floor, building, or campus), address the need to share
information among individuals in close proximity. The most popular data
communication LAN technology in the market is Ethernet. The speed of Ethernet is
10Mbps. Signal detection on Ethernet is based upon the concept of carrier sense
multiple access with collision detection ("CSMA/CD"). Today the vast majority of
Ethernet products are based on IEEE 802.3 standards. The most popular Ethernet
standard is 10Base-T, the operation of Ethernet over unshielded twisted pair
("UTP") wiring.
The Company's Ethernet data link controllers are used in local area network
systems that can interconnect a wide variety of computers and peripheral
devices. They are generally used in Ethernet-compatible systems, and replace a
substantial number of discrete components previously contained on a printed
circuit board. The Company also produces a set of Ethernet encoder/decoder
circuits, media interface adapters ("MIAs"), and Ethernet transceiver circuits.
The Company's data communication products have significantly reduced the cost of
Ethernet connections for local area network manufacturers.
The Company is also a leader in the application of automatic full duplex
technology to Ethernet LANs. SEEQ's AutoDuplex feature uses specially coded link
pulses to determine if the channel has duplex capabilities. The SEEQ patented
technique allows any node in a 10Base-T network to determine if it has a full
duplex channel for its use and to automatically modify its behavior when
establishing independent transmit and receive communication channels. This
technique effectively doubles the communications channel bandwidth available to
the node. In a 10Base-T network with full duplex nodes connected to a switching
hub or multiport bridge, the effective network bandwidth is doubled to 20
Mbits/sec. SEEQ has extended this technique to Fast Ethernet to effectively
increase the network bandwidth to 200 Mbits/sec.
12
<PAGE> 36
In order to meet customers' needs for higher-speed LAN solutions, the
Company has developed a new generation of products for the new LAN technology
called Fast Ethernet. Fast Ethernet is a 100Mbps version of traditional 10Base-T
Ethernet (10Mbps). Fast Ethernet technology is currently being considered for
standards approval by the IEEE 802.3 committee. The Company recently introduced
its first Fast Ethernet product, the 100Mbps four port Fast Ethernet controller,
for this emerging market and expects to introduce other products during fiscal
1995.
MARKETING AND SALES
The Company sells its products to OEMs and distributors representing a wide
range of markets, including computer systems, facsimile equipment, engineering
workstations, modems, process controllers, and commercial data processing
systems. The Company's ten largest customers accounted for approximately 32%,
34% and 54% of net revenues for fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1994, respectively.
No one customer accounted for 10 percent or more of revenues in fiscal 1992 and
1993, while Apple Computer and Cisco Systems accounted for approximately 16% and
11% of revenues in fiscal 1994, respectively.
The Company coordinates all domestic sales through two regional sales
offices in addition to its Fremont, California headquarters. The Company's three
OEM sales managers work closely with manufacturers' representatives and
distributors to secure design-ins and production orders.
The Company markets its products through a network of independent
manufacturers' representatives and independent distributors. The Company has
contracted with seven national distributors to stock and sell the Company's
products from an aggregate of approximately 10 stocking locations. In addition,
the Company has contracted approximately 18 independent manufacturers'
representatives throughout the United States, representing approximately 150
individual salespeople. The representatives obtain orders for SEEQ, which the
Company fills by shipping directly to the purchaser and for which the Company
pays the representatives commissions based on the sales.
International sales were approximately $6.8 million, $6.3 million and $7.1
million, representing approximately 18%, 19% and 33% of product sales, for
fiscal years 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively. International sales are
accomplished through a network of approximately 30 stocking representatives,
together with international sales management in Fremont, California. Sales to
foreign customers are shipped from the Company's headquarters F.O.B. and are
usually billed and paid in United States dollars. Although sales may be made
subject to tariffs in certain countries or with regard to certain products, at
present the Company's average selling prices for foreign sales are not
significantly different from those for domestic sales. Foreign sales are subject
to certain control restrictions imposed by the United States and foreign
governments, but the Company has not encountered any such limitations that have
materially affected its foreign sales.
Although SEEQ receives volume purchase orders, such orders do not
necessarily result in sales as they are, in most cases, consistent with industry
practice, terminable by the customer without significant penalty. Consequently,
backlog figures are not necessarily indicative of future sales.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Expertise in a variety of related disciplines and functions is necessary to
design, develop and manufacture mixed signal semiconductor integrated circuits
which combine both digital and analog circuits. These disciplines include
systems and application engineering, computer aided design, device physics,
semiconductor process engineering, circuit design, reliability physics and test
engineering. The Company has committed and will continue to commit substantial
resources over an extended period to develop new products and technologies
utilizing all of these disciplines.
The Company is concentrating on the application of its proprietary
technologies for the development of mixed signal integrated circuits for the
data communications market. Present research and development efforts are focused
on the development of Ethernet controllers and media signaling integrated
circuits for the 100Mbps Fast Ethernet market and ATM market, and more highly
integrated signaling devices for the 10Mbps Ethernet market. The Company
invented the AutoDUPLEX tech-
13
<PAGE> 37
nique for automatic full duplex operation in switched Ethernet applications
running over twisted pair cabling. The Company has one issued patent pertaining
to automatic full duplex and other applications pending.
The Company's research and development expenditures were approximately
$4,722,000, $3,289,000 and $3,278,000 for fiscal years 1992, 1993 and 1994,
respectively. As of September 30, 1994, 19 employees were engaged in research
and development activities.
MANUFACTURING
The manufacturing process for semiconductors is divided into three basic
operations: silicon wafer fabrication, assembly and testing. SEEQ has chosen to
use independent silicon foundries and assembly subcontractors to fabricate and
assemble its integrated circuits. This strategy enables the Company to focus its
resources on the design and test areas, where the Company believes it has
greater competitive advantages, and to eliminate the high cost of owning and
operating a semiconductor silicon fabrication and assembly facilities.
In fiscal 1990 a strategy was adopted to have all products manufactured by
outside foundries and to convert the Company's fabrication facility into a
preproduction and process development facility. As a result, in fiscal 1990, the
Company was successful in implementing subcontract silicon wafer fabrication
(i.e., silicon wafer foundry). The Company signed long term foundry and
technology agreements with major semiconductor suppliers such as Philips
Components- Signetics. These relationships gave the Company access to
state-of-the-art clean rooms and equipment for the production of its products.
In the first quarter of fiscal 1992, the Company entered into a silicon
fabrication agreement with IMP which provided the Company with the opportunity
to perform all preproduction and process development at outside silicon
foundries. As a result of this agreement, the Company completely phased out its
silicon fabrication operation in the third quarter of fiscal 1992.
After receiving processed silicon wafers from its foundry partners, the
Company currently ships its silicon to an independent assembly contractor in
Southeast Asia for separation into individual chips and packaging. Prior to the
end of fiscal 1991, the Company used one Korean assembly vendor exclusively.
The Company has not had any significant problems with its foreign assembly
contractors to date. However, the Company's reliance on one or more foreign
assembly contractors and its maintenance of inventories at such contractor's
facilities entail certain political and economic risks, including political
instability and expropriation, currency controls, and changes in tariff and
freight rates. In the event the Company's foreign assembly operations were
disrupted, the Company's operations could be materially and adversely affected.
The Company has experienced some difficulties in receiving steady supplies
of processed silicon wafers from some of its foundry partners. During the fourth
quarter of fiscal 1993, the Company experienced reduced yields and deliveries
from some of its foundry partners. To solve these problems, the Company is
working closely with its foundry partners to obtain a steady and predictable
supply of integrated circuits and is in the process of adding new foundry
partners to increase capacity.
Test operations are performed during each phase of the manufacturing
process. SEEQ uses sophisticated testing equipment to test the die on each
silicon wafer prior to shipment for assembly. After assembly, each unit (i.e.,
packaged die) undergoes final electrical testing at the Company.
Although the manufacturing process is highly controlled, equipment
malfunctions, process complexities, minute impurities, or defects in the masks
may cause a substantial percentage of the silicon wafers to be rejected or
individual chips to be non-functional, a problem indigenous to the semiconductor
industry. There can be no assurance that the Company or any of its foundry
suppliers will not experience yield problems in the future.
14
<PAGE> 38
COMPETITION
The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive. SEEQ believes that no
single competitor offers similar products across SEEQ's entire product line.
However, several semiconductor manufacturers offer products competitive with
certain of those offered by the Company. The Company competes principally on the
basis of the timely and successful development and introduction of new products
and technologies, the quality, functionality, price and performance
characteristics of its products and the adaptability of such products to
specific applications. SEEQ believes that it competes favorably with respect to
most of these factors. In addition, SEEQ believes that its principal competitive
strengths arise from its technological capabilities in the development of both
mixed-signal integrated circuit and communications systems designs and its use
of CMOS process technologies. Many of SEEQ's competitors have substantially
greater technical, financial, manufacturing and marketing resources than the
Company, and no assurance can be given that the Company can continue to compete
successfully in the future.
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES
The Company pursues a policy of obtaining patents for appropriate
inventions, although the Company believes its success depends primarily upon the
experience and creative skills of its employees rather than upon the ownership
of patents. The Company has obtained nonexclusive licenses from certain other
organizations, such as Texas Instruments, Incorporated and Xerox Corporation,
for use of product designs or specifications in the development of the Company's
products. Such license arrangements on a nonexclusive basis are customary in the
industry.
The Company has one United States patent issued which expires in May 2011.
However, there can be no assurance that the patent will provide SEEQ with any
meaningful protection. The Company also has certain federally registered
trademarks. The Company is pursuing a systematic strategy of submitting patent
applications whenever justified by a combination of business and technical
considerations. In addition, the Company avails itself of mask work protection
for its designs.
As in the case with many companies in the semiconductor industry, it may
become necessary or desirable in the future for SEEQ to obtain licenses relating
to its products from others. SEEQ has in the past received notification of
possible infringement of patents from certain other semiconductor manufacturers
and these matters are under consideration. Although patent holders in the
industry typically offer licenses, and SEEQ in the past has entered into license
agreements, there can be no assurance that licenses can be obtained on
acceptable terms.
The Company, from time to time, enters into technology and second source
agreements. The Company has not granted any rights relative to its process or
design technology which are or will be exclusive.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
The manufacture of semiconductors requires the use and storage of
substantial amounts of toxic chemicals and other hazardous materials. There have
been several incidents in the semiconductor industry of environmental pollution
or personal injury related to improper storage or use of these substances. The
Company believes that its facilities are in compliance with applicable
environmental regulations, and that its operations have not caused any
significant environmental problems. The regulations concerning environmental
protection have grown increasingly complex and rigorous, however, and there can
be no assurance that the Company's continued compliance will not require it to
incur substantial expenses.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 30, 1994, the Company had 67 employees, including 10 in
marketing and sales, 19 in research, development and engineering related
functions, 30 in manufacturing and 8 in management, administration and finance.
The Company's success depends on a number of key employees, the loss of one or
more of whom could adversely affect the Company. The Company believes that its
future success will depend in large part upon its ability to attract, retain and
motivate highly skilled employees. The Company has never had a work stoppage,
slow-down or strike. None of the Company's employees are represented by a labor
union. The Company considers its employee relations to be good.
15
<PAGE> 39
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
The Company's executive offices and manufacturing and principal research
and design facilities currently occupy a 101,000 square foot building located in
Fremont, California. The building is leased by the Company under a lease
scheduled to expire in 2002 with two five-year renewal options. During November
1994, the Company entered into a sublease for the entire building, which will
commence on February 1, 1995. As a result, the Company is actively seeking a new
location for its executive offices and other facilities. The Company also leases
additional offices for its area sales managers in Westlake, California, and
Burlington, Massachusetts.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
On March 30, 1994, the Company filed a lawsuit in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California against Hualon
Microelectronics Corporation, one of the Company's former foundries and joint
development partners. In the lawsuit, the Company originally sought injunctive
relief from the court to prevent Hualon from using certain of the nonvolatile
memory technology sold by the Company to Atmel pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement, to which Hualon has asserted certain license rights under an alleged
license agreement. In response to the Company's claims, Hualon asserted
affirmative defenses and counterclaims seeking a declaration by the court that
the alleged license agreement is valid and seeking specific performance of the
alleged license agreement and other agreements previously entered into by the
two parties. Hualon filed a motion for summary judgment and the Company's
initial claim was subsequently dismissed by the court. Hualon has subsequently
amended its counterclaims to include additional claims in the proceeding,
including claims for damages for breach of, and for money owed pursuant to,
other agreements between the Company and Hualon. The Company has subsequently
amended its original complaint to include a number of additional claims against
Hualon, including claims for damages for breach of, and for money owed pursuant
to, such other agreements. Under the terms of one of the escrow agreements
entered into with Atmel in connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale, under which
$4,329,000 has been deposited in escrow, the Company will only be entitled to
receive such funds if it is determined that the alleged license agreement is
invalid, to the extent that any claims made by Atmel to such funds are
unsuccessful, if Atmel fails to make a claim to such funds by February 1999, or
as otherwise agreed by the Company and Atmel. The Company intends to vigorously
prosecute its claims in this lawsuit and to defend the claims made by Hualon.
The Company believes that its claims and defenses in this lawsuit are
meritorious. However, there can be no assurance as to the possible outcome of
this proceeding. In the event that the Company is not successful in invalidating
the alleged license agreement, Atmel may assert a claim against the Company
under the Asset Purchase Agreement, including a claim for damages, if any,
suffered by Atmel as a result of Hualon's use of any of such technology, and, in
the event any such claim by Atmel is determined to be valid, Atmel may recover
any such damages from the escrow described above. The Company believes that, in
the event of any claim by Atmel, the amount of damages that may be payable by
the Company upon a resolution thereof will not have a material adverse effect on
the Company's cash flow, financial position or results of operations. However,
there can be no assurance as to such matters.
On September 4, 1992, an action was filed against the Company by GOCO
Realty Fund I, a previous landlord, for rent and damages under a lease of the
premises previously occupied by the Company. The Company vacated the premises in
July 1992. The claims asserted in this action were subsequently assigned to
Brazos Partners L.P. ("Brazos"). In the action, plaintiff is seeking rent
through the original expiration date of the lease, which was September 9, 1994.
The lease provided for monthly rental payments of $106,142 from July 1992
through September 1992, $111,449 from October 1992 through September 1993 and
$117,021 from October 1993 through September 1994. In addition, plaintiff is
seeking certain additional rent and specified damages and costs, including
attorneys' fees and courts costs incurred in the litigation. In April 1994, the
Company proposed a settlement of this action, and Brazos indicated such a
settlement would be acceptable to Brazos. The terms of the settlement would
provide for the payment by the Company of $37,500, the issuance by the Company
to Brazos of 375,000 shares of its common stock, and the assignment by the
Company to plaintiff of a $360,000 promissory note and the $75,000 security
deposit on such premises which are both currently due to the Company. Since
April 1994, the Company has been in the process of
16
<PAGE> 40
preparing the final settlement agreement and registering the Shares under the
Securities Act. In November 1994, Brazos filed an additional lawsuit against the
Company alleging that Brazos has incurred certain damages because the Company
and Brazos have not yet entered into a final settlement agreement. The Company
believes that this additional lawsuit is without merit. Promptly following the
date of this Prospectus, the Company plans to enter into a final settlement of
the litigation with Brazos. Upon the execution of the settlement agreement and
the fulfillment of the terms thereof, all such actions and related claims
against the Company will be dismissed. The Company believes that a settlement
agreement containing such terms will be executed and that the terms of such
settlement agreement will be fulfilled by the Company. In the event that such a
settlement agreement were not executed or the terms of such settlement agreement
were not fulfilled by the Company, these actions would proceed and, in the event
the Company were not successful in these actions and it were determined that the
plaintiff is entitled to recover damages from the Company, the Company's results
of operations and financial conditions would be materially and adversely
affected.
In addition, SEEQ is involved in certain other routine litigation in the
ordinary course of its business. SEEQ is not involved in any legal proceedings
which it believes will have a material adverse effect on its financial position
or results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter
ended September 30, 1994.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The Company's stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol "SEEQ". The tables below present the high and low market prices for
fiscal years 1994 and 1993. The Company has never paid dividends on common
shares and has no present plans to do so.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal 1994 Fiscal 1993
----------- -----------
Quarter High Low High Low
- ------- ---- --- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First $1-3/4 $1-1/16 $1-1/2 $ 13/16
Second $1-1/2 $1-3/32 $1-11/16 $1
Third $1-15/16 $ 15/16 $1-5/8 $1
Fourth $1-9/32 $ 15/16 $1-3/4 $ 31/32
</TABLE>
The approximate number of stockholders of record at September 30, 1994 was 918.
17
<PAGE> 41
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The consolidated selected financial data presented below as of September
30, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 and 1994, and for each of the years in the five-year
period ended September 30, 1994, are derived from the consolidated financial
statements of the Company. The consolidated financial statements as of September
30, 1993 and 1994, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1994, have been audited by Price Waterhouse LLP, independent
accountants.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,(1)
---------------------------------------------------------------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 45,070 $48,563 $ 37,080 $32,980 $21,480
Cost and expenses:
Cost of revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,062 33,470 24,765 21,796 15,632
Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . 8,889 7,076 4,722 3,289 3,278
Marketing, general and
administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,190 10,637 10,173 7,827 6,939
Restructuring and other expenses . . . . . . . . 11,398(2) -- 7,431(3) 3,236(4) 4,932(5)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . 71,539 51,183 47,091 36,148 30,781
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from operations . . . . . . . . . . (26,469) (2,620) (10,011) (3,168) (9,301)
Interest (expense) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,424) (1,172) (1,444) (1,056) (456)
Interest and other income, net . . . . . . . . . 1,763 578 154 100 187
Gain on sales of stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- -- -- -- 1,693(6)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . (26,130) (3,214) (11,301) (4,124) (7,877)
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . -- -- -- -- --
===================================================================
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(26,130) $(3,214) $(11,301) $(4,124) $(7,877)
===================================================================
Net income (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . $ (2.00) $ (0.22) $ (0.74) $ (0.25) $ (0.32)
===================================================================
Average common shares
and equivalents outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . 13,042 14,454 15,243 16,741 24,273
===================================================================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30,
---------------------------------------------------------------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,541 $ 5,557 $ (607) $ 5,088 $ 908
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,995 38,795 23,728 17,871 17,307
Long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,531 6,283 1,602 1,926 2,564
Stockholders' equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,046 13,742 4,472 6,544 4,056
</TABLE>
- ---------------------------
(1) The Selected Financial Data for fiscal years ended September 30, 1990
through September 30, 1993 does not give effect to the sale of assets in the
EEPROM Asset Sale on February 7, 1994, which constituted a significant
portion of the Company's operations during these fiscal years. See the
discussion under "Recent Developments," "Pro Forma Condensed Financial
Information," and Notes 3 and 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(2) The Company recorded an $11,398,000 charge against operations in fiscal 1990
associated with restructuring its manufacturing facility.
(3) The Company recorded $7,431,000 in charges against operations in fiscal 1992
associated with closing its wafer fabrication facility. See Note 4 to Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4) The Company recorded $3,236,000 in charges against operations in fiscal 1993
reflecting an adjustment to its prior estimates in connection with closing
its wafer fabrication facility and costs associated with the resignation of
the Company's previous president and chief executive officer. See Note 4 to
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5) The Company recorded $4,932,000 representing a loss and other restructuring
costs associated with the EEPROM Asset Sale and the discontinuation of the
Company's end-user Ethernet adapter board products. See Notes 3 and 4 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(6) The Company recorded a gain on the sale of the stock of $1,693,000. See Note
3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
18
<PAGE> 42
The following table sets forth consolidated statements of operations
data for each of the eight quarters beginning October 1, 1992 and ending
September 30, 1994. This information has been derived from unaudited
consolidated quarterly financial statements of the Company, which include all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, except for
adjustments relating to certain restructuring and other expenses and gains on
sales of stock, that the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of
the information when read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus. The results
of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for any future period.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended,(1)
---------------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, March 31, June 30, Sept. 30,
1992 1993 1993 1993
---- ---- ---- ----
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 8,636 $ 8,943 $ 8,773 $ 6,628
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues 5,364 5,309 5,564 5,559
Research and development 791 791 798 909
Marketing, general and administrative 2,085 2,064 1,824 1,854
Restructuring and other expenses -- -- -- 3,236
--------------------------------------------------
Total costs and expenses 8,240 8,164 8,186 11,558
--------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from operations 396 779 587 (4,930)
Interest expense (319) (279) (296) (162)
Interest and other income, net 43 38 (1) 20
Gain on sales of stock -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes 120 538 290 (5,072)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 15 56 26 (97)
--------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $ 105 $ 482 $ 264 $(4,975)
==================================================
Net income (loss) per share $ 0.01 $ 0.03 $ 0.02 $ (0.26)
==================================================
Average common shares and
equivalents outstanding 15,659 15,945 16,681 19,210
Three Months Ended,(1)
---------------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, Mar. 31, June 30, Sept. 30,
1993 1994 1994 1994
---- ---- ---- ----
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 5,828 $ 4,292 $ 5,943 $ 5,418
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues 4,728 3,939 3,446 3,518
Research and development 740 1,072 794 671
Marketing, general and administrative 2,059 2,803 1,219 858
Restructuring and other expenses -- 3,391 1,664 (123)
--------------------------------------------------
Total costs and expenses 7,527 11,205 7,123 4,924
--------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from operations (1,699) (6,913) (1,180) 494
Interest expense (132) (164) (72) (89)
Interest and other income, net 46 55 32 53
Gain on sales of stock -- -- 1,693 --
--------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes (1,785) (7,022) 473 458
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $(1,785) $(7,022) $ 473 $ 458
==================================================
Net income (loss) per share $ (0.08) $ (0.29) $ 0.02 $ 0.02
==================================================
Average common shares and
equivalents outstanding 21,803 23,816 25,788 25,895
</TABLE>
- -----------------
(1) The Quarterly Selected Financial Data for the fiscal quarters ended December
31, 1992 through December 31, 1993 does not give effect to the sale of
assets in the EEPROM Asset Sale on February 7, 1994, which constituted a
significant portion of the Company's operations during these quarters. See
the discussion under "Recent Developments," "Pro Forma Condensed Financial
Information," and Notes 3 and 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
BACKGROUND
The Company was founded in 1981 to focus on the development and manufacture
of EEPROMs, and in 1982 began developing Ethernet data communication products.
The Company recorded its first profitable year in fiscal 1987 and the growth
continued in fiscal 1988 as both revenues and net income reached record levels.
In addition, the Company's financial condition was strengthened when a public
common stock offering was completed in May 1988. Fiscal 1989 results were
adversely affected by weakening market conditions and production problems. In
fiscal 1989, the Company adopted a strategy to have its products manufactured by
outside foundries. In fiscal 1989, a manufacturing and technology agreement with
Philips Components-Signetics provided alternate source and foundry services for
the Company's Flash and EEPROM products. In fiscal 1990, the Company further
solidified its foundry strategy with an agreement with Hualon Microelectronics
Corporation ("Hualon"). With the aid of these alliances, in September 1990, the
Company decided to convert its existing manufacturing
19
<PAGE> 43
plant into a pre-production and process development facility. As a result of
this decision, in fiscal 1990, the Company recorded an $11,398,000 restructuring
charge for equipment write-offs, facility, lease and other equipment costs,
severance and incentive payments and the costs of foundry transfer. In the first
quarter of fiscal 1992, the Company entered into a wafer fabrication foundry
agreement with International Microelectronics Products, Inc. ("IMP") which
allows the Company to perform all of its pre-production and process development
activities at outside foundries. As a result of the IMP agreement, the Company
made a decision to completely phaseout its fabrication operations, and recorded
$7,431,000 in restructuring charges in fiscal 1992 as a result of the closure of
the wafer manufacturing facility. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1993, the
Company recorded an additional $2,449,000 restructuring charge. This additional
charge was attributable to the Company's unsuccessful attempts to sell certain
remaining fabrication equipment from the Company's fabrication facility and a
write-off of certain inventory manufactured by the Company which became
nonsalable as a result of the production and delivery of qualified products from
the Company's foundry partners. Additional reserves were also recorded due to
certain pending litigation which arose as a result of the Company's decision to
abandon its fabrication facility. See "Business--Litigation."
During the quarter ended March 31, 1994, the Company sold its assets
related to its electrically erasable programmable read only memory ("EEPROM")
products (the "EEPROM Asset Sale") to Atmel Corporation ("Atmel"). Under the
terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 1994 between SEEQ and
Atmel, Atmel acquired all rights in SEEQ's assets related to EEPROM products,
including intellectual property, equipment, inventory and a portion of the
accounts receivable. The purchase price for such assets consisted of 135,593
shares of Atmel's Common Stock and $481,632 in cash. In addition, Atmel assumed
certain liabilities under equipment leases for equipment used in producing
EEPROM products.
During the third quarter of fiscal 1994, SEEQ sold the 135,593 shares of
Atmel Common Stock it received in the EEPROM Asset Sale for total proceeds of
$6,693,000, reflecting a gain on the sale of $1,693,000. A significant portion
of the proceeds from the stock sale was deposited in two escrow accounts subject
to claims of indemnity by Atmel under the Asset Purchase Agreement. One escrow
account, containing $600,000 (recorded as other current assets), is subject to
claims by Atmel with respect to the equipment, inventory and accounts receivable
sold to Atmel in the EEPROM Asset Sale. Atmel has asserted a claim for the full
amount deposited in this escrow account. SEEQ has notified Atmel that it
disagrees with the claim, and Atmel and SEEQ are currently attempting to resolve
this claim under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. The funds in this
escrow account will remain in escrow until the claim is resolved by an agreement
between SEEQ and Atmel, or a determination is made by a court or arbitrator. The
second escrow account, containing $4,329,000 (recorded as other assets), is
subject to claims that may be made by Atmel with respect to the EEPROM
technology sold to Atmel in the EEPROM Asset Sale. Atmel has notified SEEQ that,
based on certain claims asserted by Hualon that SEEQ previously granted Hualon
certain license rights to the EEPROM technology, Atmel believes it may be
entitled to assert a claim against this escrow account, although Atmel has not
done so to date. The funds in this escrow account will remain in escrow until
February 1999, or if a determination is made that SEEQ is entitled to such funds
under any release condition in the escrow agreement, or if Atmel makes a claim
prior to February 1999 under such escrow then until such claim is resolved by a
court. See "Business--Litigation."
In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale, Atmel acquired 3,614,701 shares
of SEEQ's Common Stock pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 7,
1994, representing approximately 14% of SEEQ's outstanding shares of Common
Stock as of such date. Such shares were purchased at a price of $1.25 per share,
for a total purchase price of $4,518,376.
As a result of the EEPROM Asset Sale, the Company's revenue since the date
of sale is derived solely from sales of data communication products. Sales of
EEPROM products represented approximately $16,698,000, or 50.6%, and $3,036,000,
or 14.1%, of the Company's revenues during fiscal 1993 and 1994, respectively.
In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale and the Company's decision in the
second quarter of fiscal 1994 to discontinue its end-user Ethernet adapter board
product line, the Company adopted a restructuring plan pursuant to which, among
other things, certain business operations were discontinued, certain facilities
are being eliminated and certain employees were termi-
20
<PAGE> 44
nated. As a result of the EEPROM Asset Sale and restructuring plan and certain
adjustments to the reserve at September 30, 1993, the Company recorded total
restructuring and other costs of $4,932,000 as set forth in the following table
and as described below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Restructuring
Benefit Utilization of
Reserve at (Charge) (Benefit) Reserve at
September 30, Recorded in Charge During September 30,
1993 Fiscal 1994 Fiscal 1994 1994
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Facility lease, inventory and other
equipment costs $(2,055) $ 1,026 $ 413 $ (616)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EEPROM Asset Sale Restructuring: --
Sale proceeds -- 5,482 (5,482) --
Less: Costs of assets transferred -- (5,656) 5,656 --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss on sale -- (174) 174 --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess facilities -- (3,186) 652 (2,534)
Severance -- (421) 421 --
Discontinued inventories -- (404) 254 (150)
Excess property and leasehold -- (158) 158 --
improvements
Other costs -- (578) 231 (347)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- (4,747) 1,716 (3,031)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
End-user Ethernet adapter board
products write-off:
Discontinued inventories -- (808) 808 --
Other costs -- (229) 229 --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- (1,037) 1,037 --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $(2,055) $(4,932) $ 3,340 $(3,647)
=====================================================================
</TABLE>
FACILITY LEASE, INVENTORY AND OTHER EQUIPMENT COSTS
In fiscal 1994, the Company recorded an adjustment to a reserve previously
recorded in prior fiscal years to cover estimated costs in connection with the
termination of the Company's prior facility lease. See Note 11 to Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
EEPROM ASSET SALE RESTRUCTURING
In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale, the Company incurred certain
restructuring costs as follows:
Excess facilities. The Company determined that the Company's current
headquarters' office and manufacturing space is substantially in excess of the
facilities necessary to operate the Company's continuing business. Since the
Company occupies these facilities under a lease with a remaining term of
approximately eight years, the Company decided to sublease its facilities for
the remaining term of the lease. The Company recorded reserves representing the
Company's estimate of the difference between the rent payable by the Company
under the lease and the anticipated rent payable to the Company under a
sublease. During November 1994, the Company sublet the entire facility in which
its headquarters and operations are currently located and plans to relocate to a
new location during the quarter ending March 31, 1995.
21
<PAGE> 45
Severance. The Company substantially reduced its workforce as a result of
the termination of 78 employees in the quarter ended March 31, 1994.
Discontinued inventories. As a result of the EEPROM Asset Sale, the Company
discontinued certain inventories.
Excess property and leasehold improvements. The Company wrote off fixtures
and other property and leasehold improvements related to the assets sold that
were no longer usable in the Company's continuing operations.
Other costs. The Company recorded other costs, including property tax
obligations, obsolete computer systems and legal fees.
END-USER ETHERNET ADAPTER BOARD PRODUCTS WRITE-OFF
During the quarter ended March 31, 1994, the Company discontinued its
end-user Ethernet adapter board product line, and recorded restructuring costs
as follows:
Discontinued inventories. The Company wrote off Ethernet adapter board
product inventories that the Company discontinued.
Other costs. The Company recorded other costs, including severance costs,
component supplier termination charges and excess property and leasehold
improvement write-offs.
ANNUAL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FISCAL 1994 COMPARED TO FISCAL 1993
The Company's revenues in fiscal 1994 were $21,480,000, a reduction of 35%
from $32,980,000 in fiscal 1993. This reduction primarily reflects the failure
by Hualon to deliver to the Company sufficient quantities of wafers having
acceptable yields and quality for EEPROM products during the first and second
quarters of fiscal 1994 and the effect of the EEPROM Asset Sale on February 7,
1994, which resulted in a decrease in EEPROM product sales from $16,494,000 in
fiscal 1993 to $3,036,000 in fiscal 1994. Local area network ("LAN") integrated
circuit product sales increased $285,000, or 2.0%, to $14,258,000 in fiscal 1994
as compared to fiscal 1993 due to a 21.3% increase in unit sales volumes,
partially offset by a 15.6% decrease in average selling prices. LAN subsystem
product sales increased $1,673,000, or 66.6%, to $4,186,000 in fiscal 1994 as
compared to fiscal 1993. The increase in LAN subsystem product sales in fiscal
1994 was primarily due to shipments of proprietary transceiver products to Apple
Computer which began in March 1994. The increase in revenues attributable to
sales of transceiver products to Apple Computer was partially offset by a
decrease in sales of Ethernet adapter board products as a result of the
discontinuance of the Company's Ethernet adapter board product line in the
second quarter of fiscal 1994. Sales of transceiver products to Apple Computer
represented 17.8% of the Company's revenues in fiscal 1994.
Gross margins decreased to 27.2% in fiscal 1994 compared to 33.9% in fiscal
1993. The decrease in gross margin percentage in fiscal 1994 is largely
attributable to the loss of certain economies of scale as a result of lower
production volumes for EEPROM products in the first and second quarters of
fiscal 1994, primarily as a result of the low levels of supply and poor yields
on wafers to be manufactured by Hualon, which decreased production efficiency
and increased the overall per unit product cost. As a result of the EEPROM Asset
Sale, the Company substantially reduced its workforce, reduced its facility
requirements and eliminated its lower margin products. Gross margins in future
periods will be affected primarily by sales levels and product mix, average
selling prices, wafer yields, the introduction of new products and improvements
in manufacturing costs.
22
<PAGE> 46
Research and development expenditures for fiscal 1994 were $3,278,000 and were
essentially unchanged as compared to fiscal 1993 expenditures of $3,289,000.
Lower payroll costs as a result of the termination of personnel associated with
EEPROM products research and development during the second quarter of fiscal
1994 were offset by increased engineering materials, contracting and equipment
expenses associated with the development of the Company's next generation of LAN
integrated circuits. Research and development expenditures were 15.3% of
revenues in fiscal 1994 compared to 10.0% of revenues in fiscal 1993, primarily
reflecting the lower sales levels as a result of the EEPROM Asset Sale. The
Company believes that the development of new products and enhancement of
existing products is essential to its continued success. Consequently, the
Company anticipates that its research and development expenditures will be
somewhat higher in future periods as a result of increased development efforts
on new LAN products.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 1994 decreased
$888,000, or 11.3%, to $6,939,000 as compared to fiscal 1993. This decrease was
attributable primarily to a decrease in payroll, reductions in marketing and
selling commissions, product advertising and administrative expenses after the
Company reduced its workforce and terminated operations of sales offices no
longer needed after the EEPROM Asset Sale. These year-to-year expense reductions
were partially offset by increases in litigation expenses, payments made to
certain executive officers of the Company under the special loan forgiveness
program, and reserves for future payments and associated costs under the officer
loan forgiveness program covering the full amount of the notes to be forgiven.
As a percentage of revenues, marketing, general and administrative expenses were
32.3% in fiscal 1994 compared to 23.7% in fiscal 1993, primarily reflecting
lower sales levels of EEPROM products as a result of the EEPROM Asset Sale. The
Company anticipates that marketing, general and administrative expenses will be
lower in future periods primarily as a result of continued efforts to reduce
overhead expenses offset partially by increased variable selling commissions.
Interest expense has resulted primarily from borrowings under the Company's
credit facility and from equipment leases. Interest expense in fiscal 1994
decreased $600,000 to $456,000 as compared to fiscal 1993 as a result of a
reduction in lease payments, primarily attributable to the assignment of certain
lease obligations to Atmel in the EEPROM Asset Sale.
On October 1, 1993, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109 (FAS 109), "Accounting for Income Taxes." The adoption of FAS
109 changes the Company's method of accounting for income taxes from the
deferred method (APB 11) to an asset and liability approach. Previously the
Company deferred the past tax effects of timing differences between financial
reporting and taxable income. The asset and liability approach requires the
recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases
of assets and liabilities. Adoption of FAS 109 did not have a significant effect
on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
FISCAL 1993 COMPARED TO FISCAL 1992
Revenues in fiscal 1993 decreased 11.1% from fiscal 1992, as revenues were
$32,980,000 in fiscal 1993 compared to $37,080,000 in fiscal 1992. Revenues in
fiscal 1992 included $1,000,000 in non-recurring license fees. The decrease in
revenues in fiscal 1993 compared to fiscal 1992 was due primarily to a 21.1%
decrease in sales of the Company's EEPROM and UVEPROM products as a result of
decreased unit volume, partially offset by an increase in average selling prices
due to a high percentage of sales of more highly priced and more advanced
memories. In addition, the decrease in product sales was partially due to
certain events in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1993: failure by the Company's
foundry partners to deliver on a timely basis sufficient quantities of wafer
products having acceptable yields and sufficient quality, and a cash shortage at
the beginning of the quarter which restricted the Company's ability to start new
wafers. Although there was a decline in the overall sales of memory products of
the Company, fiscal 1993 sales of these products to military customers increased
10.4% from fiscal 1992. The decrease in sales of memory products was partially
offset by a 9.0% increase in sales of the Company's Ethernet data communication
products. The Ethernet data communication product sales increase was a result of
an increase in the unit volume of such products, offset partially by a decrease
in the average selling prices of such products primarily as a result of a change
in product mix reflecting the sales of a greater number of lower priced
products.
23
<PAGE> 47
Gross profit was $11,184,000 or 33.9% of net sales in fiscal 1993 as compared
to $12,315,000, or 33.2% of net sales in fiscal 1992. Gross profit margins
continued to be favorably impacted by increased sales of higher margin Ethernet
data communication products. The Company believes that gross profit margins have
been and will continue to be favorably affected by the reduction in costs
achieved by the Company in connection with its restructuring and workforce
reductions in prior periods. Further improvements in the Company's gross margins
will be dependent upon achieving additional cost reductions through the
Company's long-term foundry arrangements.
Research and development expenses in fiscal 1993 were $3,289,000 or 10.0% of
net sales, compared to $4,722,000 or 12.7% of net sales in fiscal 1992. Although
research and development expenditures were lower in fiscal 1993 than in fiscal
1992, the Company continued to invest significant amounts in research and
development of its core EEPROM and Ethernet data communication technologies and
in the development of new products and processes. The decrease in research and
development expenditures was due primarily to decreased salary and benefits
expenses resulting from a reduction in personnel and lower indirect material
costs. As a part of the Company's efforts to reduce expenses and its
restructuring, the Company's expenditures on research and development activities
have been significantly reduced during recent periods due primarily to a
substantial decrease in the number of engineers devoting their efforts to
research and development. These reductions have resulted in a decrease in the
Company's research and development efforts in substantially all areas, including
new products and manufacturing process development.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses were $7,827,000 or 23.7% of net
sales in fiscal 1993 compared to $10,173,000 or 27.4% of net sales in fiscal
1992. The decrease in expenses was principally attributable to decreased salary
and benefits expenses due to a reduction in personnel as a part of the Company's
workforce reductions in prior periods, lower bad debt, product advertising and
other overhead expenses associated with a reduced headcount, partially offset by
higher sales representative's commission expense.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1993, a $3,236,000 charge was recorded for
restructuring and other expenses as a result of several factors. The Company
recorded a writedown of the remaining fabrication equipment from the 1992 plant
closure resulting from unsuccessful attempts to sell this rapidly aging
equipment. In addition, there was a writeoff of SEEQ manufactured inventory that
relates to three products originally manufactured in the Company's closed
fabrication facility, which became obsolete after receiving qualified products
from the Company's foundry partners in the fourth quarter. Additional reserves
were also recorded due to certain pending litigation. Finally, as a result of
the resignation of the Company's previous president and chief executive officer,
the Company recorded other non-recurring expenses relating to severance costs
and his portion of the officer loan forgiveness program adopted by the Company's
Board of Directors in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1993 (See Note 4 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
Interest expense was $1,056,000 in fiscal 1993 compared to $1,444,000 in
fiscal 1992 due to lower interest expense associated with equipment leases that
were paid off as part of the restructure and shut-down of the Company's
fabrication facility. Nominal interest income declined due to lower average cash
balances and the absence of short-term cash investments.
No income tax benefit from net operating loss carryforwards was recorded in
fiscal 1993 since future realization of such carryforwards is not assured. As of
September 30, 1993, the Company had significant net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the "Act") also may impair or
reduce future annual utilization of net operating loss carryforwards under
certain circumstances, including the event of a cumulative stock ownership
change of greater than 50% over a three-year period as defined under the Act.
FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE RESULTS
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical. The industry is characterized
by rapid technological change, fluctuations in end-user demand and price
erosion. Accordingly, a particular company's operating results may be affected
not only by industry-wide demand, but also by timely introduction of new
products, market acceptance of competitive products, price competition and the
distribution channels for its products. The Company's future quarterly operating
results may also fluctuate as a result of other Company specific factors, such
as price competition for mature products, growth of the Ethernet local area
24
<PAGE> 48
networking segment of the electronics market and acceptance of the Company's
newly introduced products for that market segment, variations in manufacturing
yields for its products and significant expenditures for new products and
process development. Due to the foregoing and other factors, past results may
not be indicative of future results.
In addition, the securities of many high-technology companies have
historically been subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations. The Company
may be subject to these same fluctuations which may adversely affect the market
price of the Common Stock.
With specific reference to customer product shipment demands, the increase in
LAN subsystem product sales for the third quarter of fiscal 1994 was primarily
due to shipments of proprietary transceiver products to Apple Computer which
began in March 1994. Since there is no long term contract with Apple Computer
for these proprietary products, the Company is limiting its production to meet
only firm purchase orders received from Apple Computer. These shipments
represented 23.2% of the Company's revenues for the third quarter of fiscal
1994. The Company cannot predict the long term future requirements of this
customer with any degree of certainty. Due to the foregoing and other factors,
past results may not be indicative of future results.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has financed its operations and met its capital requirements
through cash raised from operations, private and public placements of equity and
debt securities, capital leases and bank lines of credit.
Management believes that existing sources of liquidity, anticipated cash flow
from operations, borrowings under the Company's credit facility, and expected
results of litigation (see Item 3), will be adequate to satisfy its projected
working capital expenditures through the end of fiscal 1995. However, there can
be no assurance that the Company will have adequate resources to satisfy such
requirements. It may become necessary for the Company to raise additional funds
from debt and/or equity financing. There can be no assurance that such funds
will be available on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.
The Company's cash and cash equivalents balance increased from $774,000 as of
September 30, 1993 to $2,253,000 as of September 30, 1994, primarily as a result
of the proceeds from the sale of the Company's common stock to Atmel in
connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash flows used for operating activities in fiscal 1994 were $1,923,000
compared to $969,000 in fiscal 1993. The increase in cash flows used by
operating activities for fiscal 1994 compared to fiscal 1993 was due primarily
to the net loss in fiscal 1994 of $4,638,000 before provisions for restructuring
of $4,932,000 and before the effect of the gain on sales of stock of $1,693,000
compared to the net loss in fiscal 1993 of $888,000 before provisions for
restructuring of $3,236,000 and payments of certain other accrued liabilities
associated with the assets sold in the EEPROM Asset Sale. Partially offsetting
these unfavorable operating activities, the year-to-year changes in current
assets and liabilities accounts favorably affected operating cash flows in
fiscal 1994 compared to fiscal 1993.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash flows used for investing activities in fiscal 1994 were $3,296,000,
reflecting cash invested in property and equipment acquisitions of $394,000,
partially offset by cash provided by $98,000 of proceeds attributable to the
disposal of equipment. Cash flows used for investing activities in fiscal 1993
were $200,000, reflecting cash invested in property and equipment acquisition of
$271,000, partially offset by cash provided by proceeds on disposal of equipment
of $71,000. During fiscal 1994, the Company used cash resources to reduce its
effective short-term credit borrowings interest rate by borrowing the minimum
required borrowings of $3,000,000 under a secured bank line of credit with CIT
Group/Credit Finance, Inc. ("CIT"), and investing the proceeds in a short-term
certificate of deposit. The Company anticipates modest capital expenditures in
future periods associated with its research and development activities and for
test operations.
25
<PAGE> 49
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash flows provided by financing activities in fiscal 1994 were $6,698,000.
During fiscal 1994, the Company received $4,917,000 in proceeds from the
issuance and sale of its common stock to Atmel. During fiscal 1994, the Company
borrowed $3,000,000 under its bank line of credit with CIT and invested the
proceeds in a short-term certificate of deposit. Finally, cash flows used to pay
capital lease obligations in fiscal 1994 were $1,219,000, primarily as a result
of the EEPROM Asset Sale, in which the Company terminated its equipment leases
associated with equipment transferred to Atmel. In November 1993, the Company
entered into a secured two year asset-based line of credit agreement with CIT.
The agreement provides for borrowings of up to 80% of eligible accounts
receivable not to exceed $5,000,000. The revolving credit facility is secured by
the assets of the Company and requires the Company to maintain certain
restrictive and financial covenants, including covenants requiring the Company
to maintain working capital of $750,000 and a net worth of $3,000,000, and
prohibiting the Company from incurring or agreeing to incur capital expenditures
of in excess of $1,200,000 in any fiscal year. The Company is currently in
compliance with such covenants. Interest on borrowings is payable at the
lender's reference prime rate plus 2.25% per annum, with a minimum quarterly
interest charge based on average borrowings of $3,000,000, and is payable
monthly. The credit facility has an initial term of two years and is subject to
renewal thereafter.
IMPACT OF CURRENCY AND INFLATION
The Company purchases its materials and services in U.S. dollars, and its
foreign sales are primarily billed in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the Company has
not been subject to substantial currency exchange fluctuations. However, there
can be no guarantee that this trend will continue. The effect of inflation on
SEEQ's financial results have not been significant to date.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Index to Financial Statements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Financial Statements Page
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Accountants 27
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 1994 and September 30, 1993 28
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 1994, 1993 and 1992 29
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 1994, 1993 and 1992 29
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 1994, 1993 and 1992 30
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 31-40
Financial Statement Schedules Page
II Amounts Receivable from Related Parties and Underwriters,
Promoters, and Employees Other than Related Parties S-1
V Property and Equipment S-2
VI Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization of Property and Equipment S-3
VII Valuation and Qualifying Accounts S-4
X Supplementary Statement of Operations Information S-5
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not
applicable or are not required or the information required to be set
forth therein is included in the Financial Statements or notes thereto.
</TABLE>
26
<PAGE> 50
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
In our opinion, the financial statements listed in the accompanying index
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SEEQ
Technology Incorporated and its subsidiaries at September 30, 1994 and 1993, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
fiscal years in the period ended September 30, 1994, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
San Jose, California
October 21, 1994, except for
Note 12, which is as of
November 23, 1994
27
<PAGE> 51
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 30, September 30,
(Thousands, except share amounts) 1994 1993
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash $ 2,253 $ 774
Restricted cash 3,000 --
Accounts receivable, less allowances for sales
returns and doubtful accounts of $664 and $1,692 3,254 6,210
Inventories 2,138 6,839
Other current assets 950 666
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 11,595 14,489
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property
and equipment:
Machinery and equipment 6,795 19,771
Furniture and fixtures 4,224 6,094
Leasehold improvements 195 210
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11,214 26,075
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (9,915) (22,973)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,299 3,102
Other assets 4,413 280
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 17,307 $ 17,871
===================================================================================================
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Note payable to bank $ 3,000 $ --
Accounts payable 3,185 4,015
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits 786 1,193
Other accrued liabilities 2,719 2,462
Deferred income on sales to distributors 105 69
Current portion of capitalized lease obligations 892 1,417
Current portion of notes payable -- 245
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 10,687 9,401
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term liabilities 2,564 1,926
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 8 and 11)
Stockholders' equity
Convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000
shares authorized, no shares outstanding -- --
Issuance of common stock, $.01 par value; 40,000,000 shares
authorized, 25,799,535 and 21,687,810 shares outstanding 258 217
Additional paid-in capital 117,511 112,636
Notes receivable from sale of common stock -- (472)
Accumulated deficit $(113,713) (105,837)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 4,056 6,544
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 17,307 $ 17,871
===================================================================================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
<PAGE> 52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended September 30,
----------------------------
(Thousands, except per share amounts) 1994 1993 1992
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $21,480 $32,980 $37,080
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues 15,632 21,796 24,765
Research and development 3,278 3,289 4,722
Marketing, and general and administrative 6,939 7,827 10,173
Restructuring and other expenses 4,932 3,236 7,431
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
30,781 36,148 47,091
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loss from operations (9,301) (3,168) (10,011)
Interest expense (456) (1,056) (1,444)
Interest and other income, net 187 100 154
Gain on sales of stock 1,693 -- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $(7,877) $(4,124) $(11,301)
============================================================================
Net loss per share $ (0.32) $ (0.25) $ (0.74)
============================================================================
Average common shares outstanding 24,273 16,741 15,243
============================================================================
</TABLE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Years ended September 30, 1994, 1993 and 1992
Common Stock Additional
------------------ Paid-in Notes Accumulated
(In thousands) Shares Amount Capital Receivable Deficit Total
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at September 30, 1991 14,504 $145 $105,531 $(1,522) $ (90,412) $ 13,742
=======================================================================================================================
Issuances to employees under
employee stock plans 360 4 491 -- -- 495
Issuance of common stock 700 7 1,279 -- -- 1,286
Write-off of stockholder loan -- -- -- 250 -- 250
Net loss -- -- -- -- (11,301) (11,301)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at September 30, 1992 15,564 156 107,301 (1,272) (101,713) 4,472
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issuances to employees under
employee stock plans 87 1 108 -- -- 109
Issuance of common stock 5,804 58 4,987 -- -- 5,045
Exercise of warrants 233 2 195 -- -- 197
Payment received on officer loans -- -- -- 350 -- 350
Forgiveness of officer loans -- -- -- 450 -- 450
Vesting of officer stock options -- -- 45 -- -- 45
Net loss -- -- -- -- (4,124) (4,124)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at September 30, 1993 21,688 217 112,636 (472) (105,837) 6,544
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issuances to employees under
employee stock plans 186 2 218 -- -- 220
Issuance of common stock 3,615 36 4,397 -- -- 4,433
Exercise of warrants 311 3 261 -- -- 264
Forgiveness of officer loans -- -- -- 472 -- 472
Net loss -- -- -- -- (7,877) (7,877)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at September 30, 1994 25,800 $258 $117,512 $ -- $(113,714) $ 4,056
=======================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
<PAGE> 53
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Ended September 30,
--------------------------
(Increase/(Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, in thousands) 1994 1993 1992
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $(7,877) $(4,124) $(11,301)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
used for operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,069 1,865 3,424
Gain on sales of stock (1,195) -- --
Provision for restructuring and other 4,932 3,236 7,431
Other 25 5 54
Forgiveness of officer loans 472 88 250
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 2,326 (346) 2,315
Inventories 1,597 2,285 1,641
Other current assets 316 (254) 351
Other assets 196 656 (23)
Accounts payable (830) (3,306) 2,039
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits (407) 348 (406)
Other accrued liabilities (2,100) (988) (8,154)
Deferred income on sales to distributors 36 (93) (178)
Long-term obligations (483) (341) (791)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used for operating activities (1,923) (969) (3,348)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures (394) (271) (758)
Proceeds on disposal of equipment 98 71 3,185
Short-term investments in restricted account (3,000) -- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities (3,296) (200) 2,427
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from (payments on) short-term borrowings 3,000 (4,297) 2,297
Payments of capital lease obligations (1,219) (1,108) (6,130)
Proceeds from issuances of stock 4,917 5,351 1,781
Proceeds from notes receivable on sale of stock -- 350 --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities 6,698 296 (2,052)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,479 (873) (2,973)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 774 1,647 4,620
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 2,253 $ 774 $ 1,647
=======================================================================================================
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for interest $ 433 $ 1,146 $ 1,693
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and
financing activities:
Capital lease obligations incurred for the acquisition
of equipment $ 29 $ 61 $ 51
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
<PAGE> 54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. THE COMPANY
SEEQ Technology Incorporated (the "Company") was incorporated in California on
January 13, 1981 to engage in the development, production and sale of
state-of-the-art, high technology semiconductor devices. During fiscal 1987, the
Company changed its state of incorporation from California to Delaware.
For purposes of presentation, the Company has indicated its fiscal year as
ending on September 30; whereas, in fact, the Company operates on a 52/53-week
fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in September of each year. Fiscal 1992,
1993 and 1994 are 52-week years. Two customers accounted for approximately 15.6%
and 10.6% of the Company's revenues in fiscal 1994. No one customer accounted
for 10 percent or more of revenues in fiscal 1993 or 1992. Sales to foreign
customers in fiscal years 1994, 1993 and 1992 were approximately 33%, 19% and
18%, respectively, of revenues during such years. During fiscal years 1994, 1993
and 1992, approximately $3.4 million, $3.3 million and $4.9 million
respectively, represented sales to customers in Europe, and approximately $3.6
million, $2.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, represented sales to
customers in the Asian/Pacific Rim region. Sales to other geographical regions
during such years were not material.
NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of SEEQ Technology Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Upon
consolidation, all significant intercompany accounts and transactions are
eliminated.
INVENTORIES. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined on a first-in, first-out basis.
Inventories consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------
September 30,
(Thousands) 1994 1993
- -----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $ 928 $1,766
Work in process 1,162 3,699
Finished goods 48 1,374
- -----------------------------------------------------
$2,138 $6,839
- -----------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT. Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation
is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets, generally five years. Depreciation of leasehold improvements is
computed using the shorter of the remaining term of the leases or the estimated
useful lives of the improvements. Depreciation for federal income tax purposes
is computed using accelerated methods.
LICENSE AND ROYALTY INCOME RECOGNITION. Income resulting from the licensing of
the Company's products to other manufacturers is recognized when the related
contractual obligations are fulfilled and the related fees are billable. Royalty
income is recognized upon the reported sale of products subject to royalties.
License revenue of $1 million was recognized in fiscal 1992.
SALES TO DISTRIBUTORS. The Company sells to certain domestic distributors under
agreements allowing certain rights of return and price protection on unsold
merchandise. Such sales are not recognized for financial reporting purposes
until the merchandise is sold by the distributor, as reported by the distributor
for its fiscal month end closest to that of the Company. Upon shipment of
semiconductor devices by the Company, amounts billed to domestic distributors by
the Company are included as accounts receivable; inventory is relieved; and the
sale and estimated gross profit are deferred until all the conditions of sale
are met. Semiconductor revenue from sales to international distributors is
recognized at the time of shipment. The amount of inventory maintained at
international distributors that is subject to returns and allowances is not
material.
31
<PAGE> 55
CASH EQUIVALENTS. For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company
considers all highly liquid investment instruments with a maturity of three
months or less to be cash equivalents.
INCOME TAXES. On October 1, 1993, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109 (FAS 109), "Accounting for Income Taxes." The
adoption of FAS 109 changes the Company's method of accounting for income taxes
from the deferred method (APB 11) to an Asset and Liability approach.
Previously, the Company deferred the past tax effects of timing differences
between financial reporting and taxable income. The asset and liability approach
requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for expected
future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts
and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Adoption of FAS 109 did not have a
significant effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.
BONUS PLANS. The Company's employees earn bonuses for services rendered based
upon the level of profitability achieved by the Company and the attainment of
certain performance standards by the employee. Approximately $20,000 and
$150,000 in bonuses were earned and paid in fiscal 1994 and 1993, respectively.
No bonuses were earned during fiscal 1992.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK. Financial instruments which potentially subject
the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash
equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company invests primarily in money
market accounts.
The Company's accounts receivable are derived primarily from sales to customers
located primarily in the U.S., Europe and the Asia/Pacific Rim. The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not
require collateral.
At September 30, 1994, outstanding receivables from four customers accounted for
21%, 11%, 7% and 6% of the Company's accounts receivable. At September 30, 1993,
outstanding receivables from three customers accounted for 9%, 7% and 5% of the
Company's accounts receivable.
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE. Net income per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent shares
outstanding during the applicable period. Common equivalent shares, which result
from the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants were not included in the
calculation of net (loss) per share as their effect was antidilutive.
NOTE 3. SALE OF EEPROM ASSETS AND SEEQ COMMON STOCK TO ATMEL
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 1994 (the "Asset
Purchase Agreement"), by and between SEEQ and Atmel Corporation ("Atmel"), Atmel
purchased the assets of SEEQ related to its electrically erasable programmable
read only memory ("EEPROM") products (the "EEPROM Asset Sale"). Under the terms
of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Atmel acquired all of SEEQ's rights in assets
related to SEEQ's EEPROM products, including intellectual property, equipment,
inventory and a portion of the accounts receivable. The purchase price for such
assets consisted of 135,593 shares of Atmel's common stock and $481,632 in cash.
In addition, Atmel assumed certain liabilities under equipment leases for
equipment used in producing EEPROM products.
During the third quarter of fiscal 1994, SEEQ sold the 135,593 shares of Atmel
common stock it received in the EEPROM Asset Sale for total proceeds of
$6,693,000, reflecting a gain on the sale of $1,693,000. A significant portion
of the proceeds from the stock sale was deposited in two escrow accounts subject
to claims of indemnity by Atmel under the Asset Purchase Agreement. One escrow
account, containing $600,000 (recorded as other current assets) is subject to
claims by Atmel with respect to the equipment, inventory and accounts receivable
sold to Atmel in the EEPROM Asset Sale. Atmel has asserted a claim for the full
amount deposited in this escrow account. SEEQ has notified Atmel that it
disagrees with the claim, and Atmel and SEEQ are currently attempting to resolve
this claim under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. The funds in this
escrow account will remain in escrow until the claim is resolved by an agreement
between SEEQ and Atmel, or a determination is made by a court or arbitrator. The
Company believes that it will be successful in refuting Atmel's claim and that
it will recover the full amount of $600,000 held in the escrow account. The
second escrow account, containing $4,329,000 (recorded as other assets), is
subject to claims by Atmel with respect to the EEPROM technology sold to Atmel
in the EEPROM Asset
32
<PAGE> 56
Sale. Atmel has notified SEEQ that, based on certain claims asserted by Hualon
Microelectronics Corporation ("Hualon") that SEEQ previously granted Hualon
certain license rights to the EEPROM technology, Atmel believes it may be
entitled to assert a claim against this escrow account, although Atmel has not
done so to date. The funds in this escrow account will remain in escrow until
February 1999, or if a determination is made that SEEQ is entitled to such funds
under any release condition in the escrow agreement, or if Atmel makes a claim
prior to February 1999 under such escrow then until such claim is revolved. (SEE
NOTE 11. LITIGATION.)
In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale, Atmel acquired 3,614,701 shares of
SEEQ's common stock pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 7,
1994, representing approximately 14% of SEEQ's outstanding shares as of such
date. Such shares were purchased at a price of $1.25 per share, for a total
purchase price of $4,518,376.
The following unaudited pro forma information reflects the results of operations
for the years ended September 30, 1994 and September 30, 1993 as if the EEPROM
Asset Sale had occurred as of October 1, 1992 after giving effect to certain
adjustments, including reversal of the revenue and related costs of sales
attributable to EEPROM products, reduction in research and development and
marketing expenses associated with the development and marketing of EEPROM
products and reduction in interest expense associated with leased equipment used
in manufacturing EEPROM products. The pro forma information excludes the effect
of the restructuring charges which were recorded in fiscal 1994, as a
consequence of the sale of assets in the EEPROM Asset Sale, and the effect of
the gain of sales of stock which was recorded in fiscal 1994. The average number
of shares outstanding in both periods presented has been adjusted to reflect the
effect of issuing the shares of SEEQ's common stock to Atmel pursuant to the
purchase agreement as if they had been outstanding for the entire period. The
pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not
purport to be indicative of what operating results would have been had the
acquisition actually taken place at October 1, 1992 or of operating results
which may occur in the future.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Year ended September 30,
1994 1993
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
- -------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net Sales $18,444 $16,486
Net Loss $(4,113) $(4,338)
Net Loss per Share $ (0.16) $ (0.21)
- -------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
NOTE 4. RESTRUCTURINGS
SUBCONTRACT MANUFACTURING RESTRUCTURING. In September 1990, the decision was
made to convert the Company's manufacturing plant into a pre-production and
process development facility. In order to achieve this objective, the Company
needed to develop foundry arrangements to provide the Company with an adequate
source of wafer supply.
In fiscal 1992, the Company secured additional foundry arrangements, and, as a
consequence, decided to close its manufacturing facility. In connection with the
closure of its facility in fiscal 1992, management recorded a $7,431,000
restructuring charge. This restructuring charge included facility and lease
costs, equipment writeoffs and severance payments. The restructuring charges
recorded in fiscal 1992 were in part based on management's best estimates of the
sales value of certain equipment and the cost to transfer manufacturing
processes to outside foundries.
In fiscal 1993, the Company recorded an additional $2,449,000 restructuring
charge. This charge was as a result of unsuccessful attempts by the Company to
sell certain remaining fabrication equipment and a provision was made to write
off certain Company manufactured inventory which became non-saleable as a result
of qualified products from the Company's foundry partners being produced.
Additional reserves were also recorded due to certain pending litigation (SEE
NOTE 11. LITIGATION).
33
<PAGE> 57
In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale (SEE NOTE 3. SALE OF EEPROM ASSETS AND
SEEQ COMMON STOCK TO ATMEL) and the Company's decision in the second quarter of
fiscal 1994 to discontinue its end-user Ethernet adapter board product line, the
Company adopted a restructuring plan pursuant to which, among other things,
certain business operations were discontinued, certain facilities are being
eliminated and certain employees were terminated. As a result of the EEPROM
Asset Sale and restructuring plan and certain adjustments to the reserve at
September 30, 1993, the Company recorded total restructuring and other costs of
$4,932,000.
The following table summarizes the restructuring provisions at September 30,
1994 and 1993 (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restructuring
Benefit Utilization of
(Charge) (Benefit)
Reserve at Recorded in Charge During Reserve at
September 30, 1993 Fiscal 1994 Fiscal 1994 September 30, 1994
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Facility, lease inventory and other
equipment costs $(2,055) $ 1,026 $ 413 $ (616)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EEPROM Asset Sale Restructuring --
Sale proceeds -- 5,482 (5,482) --
Less: Costs of assets transferred -- (5,656) 5,656 --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss on sale -- (174) 174 --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess facilities -- (3,186) 652 (2,534)
Severance -- (421) 421 --
Discontinued inventories -- (404) 254 (150)
Excess property and leasehold
improvements -- (158) 158 --
Other costs -- (578) 231 (347)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- (4,747) 1,716 (3,031)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-user Ethernet adapter board
products write-off
Discontinued inventories -- (808) 808 --
Other costs -- (229) 229 --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- (1,037) 1,037 --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $(2,055) $(4,932) $ 3,340 $(3,647)
============================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
FACILITY LEASE, INVENTORY AND OTHER EQUIPMENT COSTS.
This reversal in fiscal 1994 reflects an adjustment to a reserve recorded in
prior fiscal years by the Company to cover estimated costs in connection with
the termination of the Company's prior facility lease. SEE NOTE 11. LITIGATION.
EEPROM ASSET SALE RESTRUCTURING
In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale, the Company incurred certain
restructuring costs as follows:
Excess facilities. The Company determined that the Company's current
headquarters' office and manufacturing space is substantially in excess of the
facilities necessary to operate the Company's continuing business. Since the
Company occupies these facilities under a lease with a remaining term of
approximately eight years, the Company decided to sublease its facilities
34
<PAGE> 58
for the remaining term of the lease. The Company recorded reserve representing
the Company's estimate of the difference between rent payable by the Company
under the lease and the rent payable to the Company under a sublease.
Severance. The Company substantially reduced its workforce as a result of the
termination of 78 employees in the quarter ended March 31, 1994.
Discontinued inventories. As a result of the EEPROM Asset Sale, the Company
discontinued certain inventories.
Excess property and leasehold improvements. The Company wrote off fixtures and
other property and leasehold improvements related to the assets sold that were
no longer usable in the Company's continuing operations.
Other costs. The Company recorded other costs, including property tax
obligations, obsolete computer systems and legal fees.
END-USER ETHERNET ADAPTER BOARD PRODUCTS WRITE-OFF
During the quarter ended March 31, 1994, the Company discontinued its end-user
Ethernet adapter board product line, and recorded restructuring costs as
follows:
Discontinued inventories. The Company wrote off Ethernet adapter board product
inventories that the Company discontinued.
Other costs. The Company recorded other costs, including severance costs,
component supplier termination charges and excess property and leasehold
improvement write-offs.
NOTE 5. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
WARRANTS. In fiscal 1991, as partial consideration for a bank credit agreement,
the Company issued a warrant exercisable for five years to purchase 150,000
shares of the Company's common stock at $1.56 per share. In fiscal 1992, as
consideration to extend the credit agreement for an additional year, the Company
issued an additional warrant exercisable through August 1, 1995 to purchase
100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $3.13 per share. In fiscal 1992,
in conjunction with the private placement of 700,000 shares of common stock,
warrants for the purchase of a like number of shares were issued, exercisable
for three years to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at $2.75 per
share. In addition, the placement agent was granted the right to purchase 70,000
shares of common stock at $2.00 per share together with a warrant to purchase an
additional 70,000 shares of common stock at $2.75 per share. The warrants issued
in conjunction with the private placement were repriced in fiscal 1993 to
purchase the Company's common stock at $.85 per share. In fiscal 1993, in
conjunction a foreign equity offering, warrants were issued to purchase 120,000
shares of common stock at $1.25 per share. In the third quarter of fiscal 1993,
as part of a public offering of 4.6 million shares of the Company's common
stock, warrants to purchase an additional 2.3 million shares at $1.40 per share
were issued. In addition, the selling agent was granted warrants to purchase
460,000 shares of common stock at $1.06. The value of these warrants was
immaterial at the date of issuance for fiscal years 1993, 1992 and 1991.
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK. At September 30, 1994, 1,000,000 shares of
preferred stock are authorized for issuance with no shares outstanding.
Attributes of the preferred stock, such as dividend rates, voting rights, and
liquidation preferences, are subject to determination by the Company's Board of
Directors upon issuance.
COMMON SHARES. The Company's amended articles of incorporation authorize the
issuance of up to 40,000,000 common shares. The following table summarizes
shares of common stock reserved for issuance as of September 30, 1994:
35
<PAGE> 59
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Issuable upon Number of Shares
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Exercise of stock warrants 3,357,385
Exercise of stock options,
including shares available for option 5,118,965
Periodic Purchase Plan 142,273
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
8,618,623
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
NOTES RECEIVABLE. Notes receivable represent loans made to certain executive
officers during fiscal 1987 and 1988 to exercise their stock options. These
promissory notes were with full recourse to such executive officers, were
secured by the shares purchased, and were originally due and payable within
three years of issuance. The Company subsequently agreed to extend the date for
repayment of amounts borrowed by all of these executive officers through
September 30, 1993.
Because the market price of the Company's common stock declined substantially to
a level below the exercise price of such options, in fiscal 1993 the Board of
Directors adopted a Special Loan Forgiveness Program (Program). The Program was
designed so that the executive would sell the shares held in pledge by the
Company, remit the proceeds to the Company and the balance of the indebtedness
would be forgiven in quarterly installments through June 1995 to serve as a
motivation for the executives to continue in the employment of the Company.
The executives in the Program sold all SEEQ shares held in pledge by the Company
during fiscal 1993 and applied the entire proceeds of $350,000 to the repayment
of loans outstanding to the Company. In fiscal 1993, the Company's former Chief
Executive Officer left the Company and the Board of Directors decided to forgive
in full his indebtedness of $415,000. In fiscal 1994, another officer left the
Company and the Board of Directors also decided to forgive his full
indebtedness. As a consequence of the Board of Director's decisions, the Company
decided that it should reserve in full the remaining costs associated with the
Program of $667,000.
NOTE 6. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS
PERIODIC PURCHASE PLAN. All employees who have met the minimum service period
are eligible to participate in the Company's Periodic Purchase Plan. Employees
may purchase shares subject to the Plan at a price not less than 85% of the
lesser of the fair market value at the beginning or end of the offering period.
The term of each offering period is six months. During fiscal 1994, 1993 and
1992, 17,000, 19,000 and 17,000 shares were issued at average purchase prices of
$1.01, $0.85 and $1.47 per share, respectively. At September 30, 1994, 142,273
shares are available for issuance under the plan.
STOCK OPTION PLANS. During fiscal 1982 the Company adopted two stock option
plans; an incentive plan for employees and a non-statutory plan for certain
employees, directors, sales representatives, distributors and consultants. The
plans were subsequently combined. Under the restated plan, as amended, a total
of 6,360,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the
combined plan. Options are granted for a period not in excess of ten years from
the date of grant. Terms for exercising options are determined by the Board of
Directors. Options outstanding at September 30, 1994 become exercisable in
cumulative increments proportionately over a four-year period from the date of
grant, except that if termination occurs within six months from commencement
date, no options are exercisable. Options are granted to purchase shares at
prices not less than the fair market value at the date of grant. The plan
expires in 2002.
In fiscal 1990, the Company adopted a non-statutory stock option plan for
non-employee directors. A total of 200,000 shares of common stock were reserved
for issuance under the plan. Options are automatically granted to eligible board
members at the director's initial election or appointment and subsequent annual
meetings commencing with the second annual meeting following the date of initial
election or appointment. Options are exercisable after an initial six month
waiting period following the date of grant at prices not less than the fair
market value on the date of the grant. Options are subject to repurchase rights
by the Company to the extent that they are not vested at the time of termination
of Board membership.
36
<PAGE> 60
In fiscal 1990, the Company's subsidiary, Kodiak Technology Incorporated,
adopted a non-statutory stock option plan for certain employees of both Kodiak
and the Company. A total of 200,000 shares of the common stock of Kodiak were
reserved under the plan. Terms for exercising options are determined by the
Board of Directors. Options outstanding at September 30, 1993, become
exercisable after an initial waiting period of six months following the date of
grant. Options are subject to repurchase by the Company to the extent that they
are not vested at the time of termination of employment.
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the restated 1982
stock option plan:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Options Outstanding
Available --------------------------------------
(Thousands except per share amounts) For Grant Shares Price Per Share Amount
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance 9/30/91 3,428 2,272 $1.063 -- $9.250 $ 3,497
Granted (1,254) 1,254 2.250 -- 2.875 3,156
Canceled 419 (419) 1.063 -- 9.250 (975)
Exercised (343) 1.063 -- 1.875 (470)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance 9/30/92 2,593 2,764 1.063 -- 7.875 5,208
Granted (1,514) 1,514 1.000 -- 1.563 1,795
Canceled 691 (691) 1.063 -- 5.500 (1,314)
Exercised (76) 1.063 -- 1.375 (103)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance 9/30/93 1,770 3,511 1.063 -- 7.875 5,586
Granted (1,518) 1,518 1.344 -- 1.375 1,986
Canceled 1,746 (1,746) 1.063 -- 5.500 (3,106)
Exercised (162) 1.500 -- 1.625 (192)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance 9/30/94 1,998 3,121 1.000 -- 7.875 4,274
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options exercisable at 9/30/94 1,731 $1.000 -- $7.875 $ 2,454
==============================================================================================
</TABLE>
NOTE 7. SHORT-TERM NOTE PAYABLE
In fiscal 1991, the Company entered into a bank credit agreement which was
renewed in fiscal 1992. The agreement provided for borrowings of up to 80% of
eligible accounts receivable, not to exceed $5.0 million. Interest was charged
at the bank's prime rate plus 4.00% and was payable monthly. The line of credit
facility was secured by the assets of the Company and required the Company to
maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum balance of $1.5 million at the
financial institution. On February 15, 1993 the credit facility was converted
from a revolving line of credit based on eligible accounts receivable to a term
loan and extended the expiration date through September 30, 1993. The loan was
paid in full in September 1993.
In November 1993, the Company entered into a secured, two-year, asset-based line
of credit agreement with the CIT Group/ Credit Finance. The agreement provides
for borrowings at up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable not to exceed
$5,000,000. The revolving credit facility is secured by the assets of the
Company and requires the Company to maintain certain restrictive and financial
covenants, including covenants requiring the company to maintain working capital
of $750,000 and a net worth of $3,000,000, and prohibiting the Company from
incurring or agreeing to incur capital expenditures in excess of $1.2 million in
any fiscal year. The Company is currently in compliance with such covenants.
Interest on borrowings is payable at the lender's reference prime rate (7.75% at
September 30, 1994) plus 2.25% per annum, with a minimum quarterly interest
charge based on average borrowings of $3,000,000, and is payable monthly. The
credit facility has an initial term of two years and is subject to renewal
thereafter.
During fiscal 1994, in order to reduce its effective short-term credit
borrowings interest rate, the Company borrowed the minimum required borrowings
of $3,000,000 under the bank line of credit and invested the proceeds in a
short-term certificate of deposit. This investment of $3,000,000 is classified
as restricted cash.
37
<PAGE> 61
NOTE 8. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
Long-term obligations consisted of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
September 30,
1994 1993
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Other long-term obligations
Notes payable $ -- $ 245
Capitalized lease obligations 976 2,921
Facility lease obligations 2,480 422
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
3,456 3,588
Less: current portion 892 1,662
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,564 $1,926
=======================================================================
</TABLE>
The Company leases its facilities and certain manufacturing and office equipment
under non-cancelable lease arrangements. The major facility lease expires in
2002 and provides for base rental rates which are increased at various times
during the terms of the lease and for renewal options to extend the lease for
two additional five-year periods. The non-cancelable equipment leases are for
terms of three to seven years and generally provide for the lessor to retain the
depreciation for income tax purposes. Most of the leases require the Company to
pay property taxes, insurance and normal maintenance and repairs.
Leases meeting certain specific criteria are accounted for as the acquisition of
an asset and the incurrence of a liability (i.e., a capital lease). Assets
recorded as property and equipment under capital leases were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
September 30,
(Thousands) 1994 1993
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Machinery and equipment $ 1,926 $ 5,462
Furniture and fixtures 302 1,226
2,228 6,688
Accumulated amortization (2,152) (4,937)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 76 $ 1,751
=======================================================================
</TABLE>
Minimum future lease payments (in thousands) for non-cancelable leases as of
September 30, 1994 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Years ended Capital Operating
September 30, Leases Leases
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1995 $ 957 $1,105
1996 62 1,050
1997 30 1,060
1998 -- 1,075
1999 -- 1,079
Thereafter -- 2,865
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total minimum lease payments 1,049 $8,234
------------------------
Amount representing interest (73)
- -----------------------------------------------------
Present value of minimum
lease payments 976
Current portion (892)
- -----------------------------------------------------
Long-term lease obligations $ 84
- -----------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Rental expense under all operating leases was $1,522,000 for fiscal 1992,
$1,206,000 for fiscal 1993, and $1,056,000 for fiscal 1994.
38
<PAGE> 62
NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal and state income taxes has been recorded as the Company
incurred net operating losses through September 30, 1994. At September 30, 1994
the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $103,000,000
for federal income tax purposes, which may be utilized to reduce future taxable
income through 2009. Under the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the amounts of and the
benefit from net operating losses that can be carried forward may be impaired or
limited in certain circumstances. Events which may cause changes in the amount
of net operating losses that the Company may utilize in any one year include,
but are not limited to, a cumulative stock ownership change of more than 50%
over a three-year period.
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
October 1, 1993 September 30, 1994
--------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net operating loss carryforwards $ 35,845 $ 37,873
Restructuring accruals 683 1,753
Inventory reserves and basis of difference 681 177
Compensation accruals 289 154
Account receivable sales return reserve 267 303
Other 300 433
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross deferred tax assets 38,065 40,693
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depreciation and amortization (272) --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross deferred tax liabilities (272) --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance (37,793) (40,693)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total net deferred asset $ -- $ --
=======================================================================================
</TABLE>
The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset
because of the uncertainty regarding realizability.
NOTE 10. DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS
In July 1990, the Company entered into an eight year renewable manufacturing and
technology agreement with Hualon Microelectronics Corporation ("Hualon"). Hualon
provided foundry services to the Company through the second quarter of fiscal
1994. In fiscal 1994, as a result of the EEPROM Asset Sale and disputes with
Hualon, the Company is no longer utilizing Hualon's foundry services.
During the first quarter of fiscal 1992, the Company entered into a wafer
fabrication agreement with International Microelectronic Products, Inc. (IMP).
Under the agreement, IMP will provide foundry services to the Company for the
fabrication of Company designed semiconductor products. The agreement can be
terminated by either party provided a written notice of at least 18 months is
given.
NOTE 11. LITIGATION
On March 30, 1994, the Company filed a lawsuit in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California against Hualon, one of the
Company's former foundries and joint development partners. In the lawsuit, the
Company originally sought injunctive relief from the court to prevent Hualon
from using certain of the nonvolatile memory technology sold by the Company to
Atmel pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, to which Hualon has asserted
certain license rights under an alleged license agreement. In response to the
Company's claims, Hualon asserted affirmative defenses and counterclaims seeking
a declaration by the court that the alleged license agreement is valid and
seeking specific performance of the alleged license agreement and other
agreements previously entered into by the two parties. Hualon filed a motion for
summary judgment and the Company's initial claim was subsequently dismissed by
the court. Hualon has subsequently amended its counterclaims to include
additional claims in the proceeding, including claims for damages for breach of,
and for money owed pursuant to, other agreements between the Company and Hualon.
The Company has subsequently amended its original complaint to
39
<PAGE> 63
include a number of additional claims against Hualon, including claims for
damages for breach of, and for money owed pursuant to, such other agreements.
The Company intends to vigorously prosecute its claims in this lawsuit and to
defend the claims made by Hualon. The Company believes that its claims and
defenses in this lawsuit are meritorious. Under the terms of one of the escrow
agreements entered into with Atmel in connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale,
$4,329,000 has been deposited in escrow. In the event that the Company is not
successful in invalidating the alleged license agreement, Atmel may assert a
claim against the Company under the Asset Purchase Agreement, including a claim
for damages, if any, suffered by Atmel as a result of Hualon's use of any of
such technology, and, in the event any such claim by Atmel is determined to be
valid, Atmel may recover any such damages from the escrow described above. The
Company believes that, in the event of any claim by Atmel, the amount of damages
that may be payable by the Company upon a resolution thereof will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's cash flow, financial position or
results of operations.
On September 4, 1992, an action was filed against the Company by GOCO Realty
Fund I, a previous landlord, for rent and damages under a lease of the premises
previously occupied by the Company. The Company vacated the premises in July
1992. The claims asserted in this action were subsequently assigned to Brazos
Partners, L.P. ("Brazos"). In the action, plaintiff is seeking rent through the
original expiration date of the lease, which was September 9, 1994. The lease
provided for monthly rental payments of $106,142 from July 1992 through
September 1992, $111,449 from October 1992 through September 1993 and $117,021
from October 1993 through September 1994. In addition, plaintiff is seeking
certain additional rent and specified damages and costs, including attorneys'
fees and courts costs incurred in the litigation. In April 1994, the Company
proposed a settlement of this action, and Brazos indicated such a settlement
would be acceptable to Brazos. The terms of the settlement would provide for the
payment by the Company of $37,500, the issuance by the Company to Brazos of
375,000 shares of its common stock, and the assignment by the Company to
plaintiff of a $360,000 promissory note and the $75,000 security deposit on such
premises which are both currently due to the Company. Since April 1994, the
Company has been in the process of preparing the final settlement agreement and
registering the Shares under the Securities Act. In November 1994, Brazos filed
an additional lawsuit against the Company alleging that Brazos has incurred
certain damages because the Company and Brazos have not yet entered into a final
settlement agreement. The Company believes that this additional lawsuit is
without merit. Promptly following the registration of the shares of common stock
to be issued to Brazos, the Company plans to enter into a final settlement of
the litigation with Brazos. Upon the execution of the settlement agreement and
the fulfillment of the terms thereof, all such actions and related claims
against the Company will be dismissed. The Company believes that a settlement
agreement containing such terms will be executed and that the terms of such
settlement agreement will be fulfilled by the Company. In the event that such a
settlement agreement were not executed or the terms of such settlement agreement
were not fulfilled by the Company, these actions would proceed and, in the event
the Company were not successful in these actions and it were determined that the
plaintiff is entitled to recover damages from the Company, the Company's results
of operations and financial conditions would be materially and adversely
affected.
The Company is involved in various other litigation and potential claims which
management believes, based in part upon discussion with counsel, will not have
an adverse effect on the results of operations or the financial position of the
Company.
NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale, the Company accrued excess facility
costs related to its existing facilities. (NOTE 3. SALE OF EEPROM ASSETS AND
SEEQ COMMON STOCK TO ATMEL, AND NOTE 4. RESTRUCTURING.) The Company entered into
a sublease dated November 21, 1994 for such facilities, which will commence on
February 1, 1995. Based upon the terms of the sublease, in the first quarter of
fiscal 1995, the Company will reduce its accrual for excess facility costs by
approximately $800,000.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
40
<PAGE> 64
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the section entitled "Election of Directors" contained
in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the section entitled "Executive Compensation" contained
in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the section entitled "Election of Directors - Share
Ownership" contained in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the section entitled "Election of Directors" contained
in the Proxy Statement.
41
<PAGE> 65
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
See Item 8 for a list of Financial Statements and Financial Statement
Schedules.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1. Exhibits
<S> <C>
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-47985)).
3.2 Bylaws (incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-47985)).
10.1 Form of Indemnification Agreement with Directors and Officers
(incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Form 8-B filed on June
2, 1987).
10.2 Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements.
10.2.1 Restated Periodic Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by
reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1991).
10.2.2 Notice of Periodic Purchase Plan Offerings (incorporated herein by
reference to Registrant's Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration
No. 33-27419) filed on March 7, 1989).
10.2.3 Restated 1982 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by
reference to Registrant's Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration
No. 33-6544) filed on July 2, 1993).
10.2.4 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Registrant's Form S-8 Registration Statement (Registration
No. 33-35838) filed on July 11, 1990).
10.2.5 Kodiak Technology Incorporated 1989 Stock Option Plan, and related
Stock Option and Stock Purchase Agreements (incorporated herein by
reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1989).
10.2.6 Separation Agreement dated as of October 1, 1993, between the
Company and J. Daniel McCranie.
10.2.7 Separation Agreement dated as of March 4, 1994, between the Company and
Michael E. Villott.
10.3 Build to Suit Lease dated as of October 15, 1982, as amended ("1982
Lease"), between the Company and David W. Mariani Investment Partnership
dba Mariani Financial Co. (incorporated herein by reference to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1986).
10.4 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 16, 1990 between the Company
and Hualon Microelectronics Corporation (incorporated herein by referenc
to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 1990).
10.5 Technology Transfer and Foundry Agreement dated as of July 16, 1990
between the Company and Hualon Microelectronics Corporation (subject to
confidential treatment) (incorporated herein by reference to Registrant'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1990).
10.6 Business Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank dated as of August 2,
1991 (incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991).
10.7 Amendment to Business Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank as of
February 24, 1993 (incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-47985)).
10.8 Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 1991 with Silicon
Valley Bank and warrant issued pursuant thereto (incorporated herein by
reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1991).
</TABLE>
42
<PAGE> 66
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
10.9 Foundry Agreement dated as of November 15, 1991 between the Company and
International Microelectronic Products Inc. (subject to request for
confidential treatment) (incorporated herein by reference to Registrant'
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991).
10.10 Loan and Security Agreement with CIT Group/Credit Finance, Inc. dated
November 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference herein to the Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1993).
10.11 Warrant Agreement dated January 29, 1992 between the Company and certain
stockholders (incorporated by reference herein to Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-64822)).
10.12 Warrant Agreement dated April 27, 1993 between the Company and certain
stockholders (incorporated by reference herein to Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-64822)).
10.13 Form of Warrant issued by the Company to certain stockholders on July 30
1993 (incorporated by reference herein to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-64822)).
10.14 Stock Purchase Agreement and Exhibits thereto dated January 10, 1992
between the Company and certain stockholders (incorporated by reference
herein to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-64822)).
10.15 Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 1994 between the Company and
Atmel Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K
dated February 7, 1994).
10.16 Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 1994 between the Company and
Atmel Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K
dated February 7, 1994).
10.17 Escrow Agreement dated February 7, 1994 between the Company, Atmel
Corporation and Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. (incorporated b
reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated February 7, 1994).
10.18 Escrow Agreement dated April 14, 1994 between the Company, Atmel and Ban
of America NT&SA (incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1994).
13.1 Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
21.1 The Company has four subsidiaries: Kodiak Technology Incorporated, a
Delaware Corporation, Talus Technology Incorporated, a California
Corporation, SEEQ International Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation an
SEEQ International SARL, a French Corporation.
23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP, Independent Accountants.
24.1 Power of Attorney. Reference is made to the Signature Page.
(a) Reports on Form 8-K. The Company filed no Current Reports on Form 8-K
during the quarter ended September 30, 1994.
</TABLE>
Undertakings
For purposes of complying with the amendments to the rules governing Form S-8
(effective July 13, 1990) under the Securities Act of 1933, the undersigned
registrant hereby undertakes as follows:
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of
1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or controlling persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the 1933
43
<PAGE> 67
Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of the expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person
in connection with the securities being registered on the Form S-8 identified
below, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has
been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The preceding undertaking shall be incorporated by reference into registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. (Registration 33-6554), filed July 2,
1993; registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
33-35838), filed July 11, 1990; and registrant's Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 33-27419), filed March 7, 1989.
44
<PAGE> 68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
By /s/ PHILLIP J. SALSBURY
-------------------------
Phillip J. Salsbury
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: December 22, 1994
45
<PAGE> 69
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Know All Persons By These Presents, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Phillip J. Salsbury and Ralph J. Harms,
and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place, and
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report
on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof:
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in
the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
- --------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ PHILLIP J. SALSBURY Chief Executive Officer December 22, 1994
- ----------------------- and Director
(Phillip J. Salsbury) (Principal Executive
Officer)
/s/ RALPH J. HARMS Vice President, Finance December 22, 1994
- ----------------------- and Administration
(Ralph J. Harms) (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
/s/ ALAN V. GREGORY Chairman of the Board December 22, 1994
- ----------------------- and Director
(Alan V. Gregory)
/s/ J. DANIEL McCRANIE Director December 22, 1994
- -----------------------
(J. Daniel McCranie)
/s/ CHARLES HARWOOD Director December 22, 1994
- -----------------------
(Charles Harwood)
- ----------------------- Director December 22, 1994
(Peter Cheng)
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE> 70
EXHIBIT 23.1
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
Constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-27419),
the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File
No. 33-6554), the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 33-35838) of SEEQ Technology Incorporated of our report dated
October 21, 1994, except for Note 12, which is as of November 23, 1994,
appearing on page 27 of the 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
San Jose, California
December 21, 1994
47
<PAGE> 71
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SCHEDULE II
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
AMOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM RELATED PARTIES AND
UNDERWRITERS, PROMOTERS, AND EMPLOYEES OTHER THAN RELATED PARTIES
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
(IN THOUSANDS)
Balance at Balance at
Beginning Amounts Amounts End
Name of Debtor of Year Additions Collected Forgiven of Year
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1992
J. Daniel McCranie,
Chairman and CEO $ 547 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 547
Phillip J. Salsbury
Vice President 461 -- -- -- 461
Michael E. Villott,
Vice President 153 -- -- -- 153
Philip A. Ortiz
Vice President 127 -- -- -- 127
Ralph J. Harms
Vice President 91 -- -- -- 91
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,379 $ -- $ -- $ -- $1,379
==========================================================================================================================
1993
J. Daniel McCranie
Chairman and CEO $ 547 $ -- $ 132 $ 415 $ --
Phillip J. Salsbury
Vice President 461 -- 121 49 291
Michael E. Villott
Vice President 153 -- 39 16 98
Philip A. Ortiz
Vice President 127 -- 35 13 79
Ralph J. Harms
Vice President 91 -- 23 10 58
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,379 $ -- $ 350 $ 503 $ 526
==========================================================================================================================
1994
Phillip J. Salsbury
President and CEO $ 291 $ -- $ -- $ 291 $ --
Michael E. Villott
Vice President 98 -- -- 98 --
Philip A. Ortiz
Vice President 79 -- -- 79 --
Ralph Harms
Vice President 58 -- -- 58 --
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 526 $ -- $ -- $ 526 $ --
==========================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
S-1
48
<PAGE> 72
SCHEDULE V
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Other
Balance at Memory Changes Add Balance
Beginning Additions Sale(1) (Deduct)- at End
of Year at Cost Retirements Retirements Reclassification of Year
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1992
Machinery and Equipment $ 44,338 $ 473 $ 20,276 $ -- $ -- $ 24,535
Furniture and Fixtures 6,539 163 417 -- -- 6,285
Leasehold Improvements 11,228 173 11,205 -- -- 196
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 62,105 $ 809 $ 31,898 $ -- $ -- $ 31,016
=====================================================================================================================
1993
Machinery and Equipment $ 24,535 $ 164 $ 4,928 $ -- $ -- $ 19,771
Furniture and Fixtures 6,285 146 337 -- -- 6,094
Leasehold Improvements 196 22 8 -- -- 210
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 31,016 $ 332 $ 5,273 $ -- $ -- $ 26,075
=====================================================================================================================
1994
Machinery and Equipment $ 19,771 $ 40 $ 4,831 $ 8,156 $(29) $ 6,795
Furniture and Fixtures 6,094 383 1,473 809 29 4,224
Leasehold Improvements 210 -- 15 -- -- 195
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 26,075 $ 423 $ 6,319 $ 8,965 $ -- $ 11,214
=====================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
(1) In connection with the EEPROM Asset Sale, the Company sold these assets to
Atmel.
S-2
49
<PAGE> 73
SCHEDULE VI
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION OF
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additions
Balance at Charged to Other Changes Balance
Beginning Costs and Memory Sale(1) Add (Deduct)- at End
of Year Expenses Retirements Retirements Describe of Year
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1992
Machinery and Equipment $ 35,212 $ 2,321 $ (17,071) $ -- $ 661(1) $ 21,123
Furniture and Fixtures 3,722 786 (381) -- -- 4,127
Leasehold Improvements 9,616 317 (11,205) -- 1,293(1) 21
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 48,550 $ 3,424 $ (28,657) $ -- $1,954 $ 25,271
=====================================================================================================================
1993
Machinery and Equipment $ 21,123 $ 1,315 $ (4,854) $ -- $1,035(1) $ 18,619
Furniture and Fixtures 4,127 530 (336) -- -- 4,321
Leasehold Improvements 21 20 (8) -- -- 33
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 25,271 $ 1,865 $ (5,198) $ -- $1,035 $ 22,973
=====================================================================================================================
1994
Machinery and Equipment $ 18,619 $ 612 $ (5,623) $ (7,494) $ 13(2) $ 6,127
Furniture and Fixtures 4,321 443 (590) (689) 110(2) 3,595
Leasehold Improvements 33 14 (12) (0) 158(2) 193
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 22,973 $ 1,069 $ 6,225 $ 8,183 $ 281 $ 9,915
=====================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
(1) Accumulated depreciation related to the EEPROM assets sold to Atmel.
(2) Reserve for disposal of equipment charged to restructure charge.
S-3
50
<PAGE> 74
SCHEDULE VII
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additions
------------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged Balance
Beginning Costs and Against Deductions - at End
of Year Expenses Revenues Describe of Year
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1992
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts and Sales Returns $ 658 $ 1,046 $ 3,658 $ 2,720(1) $ 2,642
=============================================================================================================
1993
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts and Sales Returns $ 2,642 $ 489 $ 3,295 $ 4,734(1) $ 1,692
=============================================================================================================
1994
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts and Sales Returns $ 1,692 $ 138 $ 1,511 $ 2,677(1) $ 664
=============================================================================================================
</TABLE>
(1) Doubtful account write-offs and customer returns and price adjustments.
S-4
51
<PAGE> 75
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
SUPPLEMENTARY STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM 1994 1993 1992
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Maintenance and Repairs $ 286 $ 266 $ 553
Advertising 159 199 482
Property taxes 225 149 458
=======================================================================
</TABLE>
Items omitted if less than 1% of revenues or separately reported in the
financial statements in the 1994 Annual Report to Stockholders of SEEQ
Technology Incorporated.
S-5
52
<PAGE> 76
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Sequentially
Numbered
Exhibit Description Page
<S> <C> <C>
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference
to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 33- 47985)).
3.2 Bylaws (incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-47985)).
10.1 Form of Indemnification Agreement with Directors and Officers
(incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Form 8-B
filed on June 2, 1987).
10.2 Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements.
10.2.1 Restated Periodic Purchase Plan, as amended (incorporated
herein by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991).
10.2.2 Notice of Periodic Purchase Plan Offerings (incorporated herein by
reference to Registrant's Form S-8 Registration Statement
(Registration No. 33-27419) filed on March 7, 1989).
10.2.3 Restated 1982 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated herein
by reference to Registrant's Form S-8 Registration Statement
(Registration No. 33-6544) filed on July 2, 1993).
10.2.4 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein
by reference to Registrant's Form S-8 Registration Statement
(Registration No. 33-35838) filed on July 11, 1990).
10.2.5 Kodiak Technology Incorporated 1989 Stock Option Plan, and
related Stock Option and Stock Purchase Agreements
(incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1989).
10.2.6 Separation Agreement dated as of October 1, 1993, between the
Company and J. Daniel McCranie.
10.2.7 Separation Agreement dated as of March 4, 1994, between the
Company and Michael E. Villott.
10.3 Build to Suit Lease dated as of October 15, 1982, as amended
("1982 Lease"), between the Company and David W. Mariani
Investment Partnership dba Mariani Financial Co. (incorporated
herein by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1986).
</TABLE>
53
<PAGE> 77
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C>
10.4 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 16, 1990 between the
Company and Hualon Microelectronics Corporation (incorporated
herein by reference to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1990).
10.5 Technology Transfer and Foundry Agreement dated as of July 16,
1990 between the Company and Hualon Microelectronics
Corporation (subject to confidential treatment) (incorporated
herein by reference to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1990).
10.6 Business Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank dated as of
August 2, 1991 (incorporated herein by reference to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1991).
10.7 Amendment to Business Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank
as of February 24, 1993 (incorporated herein by reference to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-47985)).
10.8 Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 1991 with
Silicon Valley Bank and warrant issued pursuant thereto
(incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1991).
10.9 Foundry Agreement dated as of November 15, 1991 between the
Company and International Microelectronic Products Inc.
(subject to request for confidential treatment) (incorporated
herein by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1991).
10.10 Loan and Security Agreement with CIT Group/Credit Finance, Inc.
dated November 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference into the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1993).
10.11 Warrant Agreement dated January 29, 1992 between the Company
and certain stockholders (incorporated by reference herein to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-64822)).
10.12 Warrant Agreement dated April 27, 1993 between the Company and
certain stockholders (incorporated by reference herein to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-64822)).
10.13 Form of Warrant issued by the Company to certain stockholders
on July 30, 1993 (incorporated by reference herein to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-64822)).
10.14 Stock Purchase Agreement and Exhibits thereto dated January 10,
1992 between the Company and certain stockholders
(incorporated by reference herein to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-64822)).
10.15 Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 1994 between the
Company and Atmel Corporation (incorporated by reference to the
Company's Form 8-K dated February 7, 1994).
10.16 Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 1994 between the
Company and Atmel Corporation (incorporated by reference to
the Company's Form 8-K dated February 7, 1994).
10.17 Escrow Agreement dated February 7, 1994 between the Company,
Atmel Corporation and Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
(incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K dated
February 7, 1994).
10.18 Escrow Agreement dated April 14, 1994 between the Company,
Atmel and Bank of America NT&SA (incorporated by reference to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 1994).
</TABLE>
54
<PAGE> 78
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C>
13.1 Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
21.1 The Company has four subsidiaries: Kodiak Technology
Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Talus Technology
Incorporated, a California Corporation, SEEQ International
Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation and SEEQ International
SARL, a French Corporation.
23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP, Independent Accountants.
24.1 Power of Attorney. Reference is made to the Signature Page.
</TABLE>
55
<PAGE> 79
56
<PAGE> 80
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
THE DATA COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
COMPANY PROFILE
SEEQ Technology Incorporated is a leading designer and manufacturer of Data
Communication products. As an Ethernet silicon pioneer, it introduced the
industry's first Ethernet chip set in 1982. SEEQ manufactures integrated
circuits that use specialized complementary metal oxide silicon (CMOS) process
technology and mixed signal design techniques. Founded in 1981, the Fremont,
California-based company has shipped more than 10 million LAN integrated
circuits. SEEQ's Ethernet solutions are used in industry leading products for
bridges and routers, switching hubs, LAN and wide area network (WAN) analyzers,
workstations and network printers. In September 1994, it unveiled the industry's
first Fast Ethernet (100 mega-bits/second) four-port controllers. SEEQ also
pioneered Full Duplex Ethernet chip solutions introducing the industry's first
offering in November 1992. SEEQ's broadened vision as The Data Communications
Company enables it to further leverage its capabilities in the evolving data
communications marketplace, including Fast Ethernet and Asynchronous Transfer
Mode (ATM). SEEQ is a contributing member of the Fast Ethernet Alliance, Full
Duplex Switched Ethernet Consortium and the Desktop ATM 25 Alliance. SEEQ
completed its initial public offering of common stock in October 1983 and is
located at 47200 Bayside Parkway, Fremont, California 94538. Telephone (510)
226-7400.
SEEQ HURRICANE(TM) AND AUTODUPLEX(TM) DESIGNATION.
[PHOTO]
SEEQ's Hurricane family of products offer 100 Mbit Fast Ethernet Solutions.
Symbol indentifies product as a part of SEEQ's Hurricane family.
[PHOTO]
Symbol indentifies product as AutoDUPLEX device.
Hurricane and AutoDUPLEX are trademarks of SEEQ Technology Incorporated.
<PAGE> 81
Board of Directors
ALAN V. GREGORY
Chairman of the Board
SEEQ Technology Incorporated
Chairman and CEO
XECOM, Inc.
DR. PHILLIP J. SALSBURY
Chief Executive Officer, President
SEEQ Technology Incorporated
CHARLES HARWOOD
Director
SEEQ Technology Incorporated
J. DANIEL McCRANIE
Director
SEEQ Technology Incorporated
Vice President, Sales and Marketing
Cypress Semiconductor
PETER CHENG
Director
SEEQ Technology Incorporated
President, Crosslink Semiconductor, Inc.
Corporate Officers
DR. PHILLIP J. SALSBURY
Chief Executive Officer, President
RALPH J. HARMS
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary
PHILIP A. ORTIZ
Vice President, Worldwide Sales
WALTER B. GEBAUER
Vice President, Manufacturing
Corporate Counsel
BROBECK, PHLEGER &
HARRISON
San Francisco, California
Independent Accountants
PRICE WATERHOUSE
San Jose, California
Registrar & Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company
40 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005
Corporate Headquarters
47200 Bayside Parkway
Fremont, California 94538
Additional copies of this report
are available by writing to:
SEEQ Technology Incorporated
47200 Bayside Parkway
Fremont, California 94538
(510) 226-7400
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of stockholders
will be held 3:00 PM, March 23, 1995
at SEEQ Technology, Inc.
47200 Bayside Parkway
Fremont, CA 94538
