<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec. 240.14a-11(c) or sec. 240.14a-12
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No fee required.
[X] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(l) and
0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
Common Stock of Jacor Communications, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
66,569,503
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
$67.00*
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
$4,460,156,701.00
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
Fee calculated and paid by Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[X] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[X] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
$1,239,925
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
333-72839
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
2/24/99
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(4) as the average of the high
and low sale prices of Jacor common stock on February 19, 1999, as quoted on
the Nasdaq National Market.
<PAGE> 2
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
50 EAST RIVERCENTER BOULEVARD, 12TH FLOOR
COVINGTON, KENTUCKY 41011
-------------------------
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MARCH 26, 1999
-------------------------
A special meeting of stockholders of Jacor Communications, Inc. will be
held on March 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Metropolitan Club, 50
East RiverCenter Boulevard, 19th Floor, Covington, Kentucky for the purposes of
considering and acting on the following proposals:
1. A proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of October 8, 1998, among Clear Channel Communications,
Inc., CCU Merger Sub, Inc. and Jacor Communications, Inc., and
approve the merger. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to
the enclosed Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus as Annex A.
2. To transact such other business as may properly be presented at the
special meeting of stockholders or any adjournment or adjournments
thereof.
Holders of record of the Jacor common stock at the close of business on
February 22, 1999 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting
of stockholders.
The board of directors of Jacor unanimously recommends that stockholders
vote FOR approval of the merger and approval and adoption of the merger
agreement.
This Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus gives you more information about the
merger. We have also enclosed a proxy card for you to cast your vote.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS IN
PERSON, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE
ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE. YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY IN WRITING OR AT THE SPECIAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN PERSON. YOUR COOPERATION IN
SIGNING AND PROMPTLY RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Paul F. Solomon
Paul F. Solomon
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
February 23, 1999
<PAGE> 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SECTION PAGE
------- ----
<S> <C>
Questions and Answers About the Merger...................... 1
Who Can Help Answer Your Questions.......................... 4
Summary..................................................... 5
Risk Factors................................................ 18
Risks Relating to the Merger.............................. 18
The Merger Consideration to Be Received by Jacor
Stockholders is Not Determinable in Advance and Could
Substantially Differ from Their Expectations.......... 18
The Cap on the Exchange Ratio Could Result in a
Substantial Reduction in the Value of the Merger
Consideration to Be Received by Jacor Stockholders.... 18
The Merger May Be Terminated if Clear Channel's Stock
Price Falls Substantially............................. 18
The Combined Company Will Have Pro Forma Losses........ 18
Clear Channel Stockholders Will Be Diluted by the
Merger................................................ 18
We May Need to Divest Assets and Agree to Ongoing
Operating Restrictions to Obtain Antitrust Regulatory
Approvals Necessary for the Merger.................... 19
We May Need to Divest Assets and Agree to Ongoing
Operating Restrictions to Obtain FCC Regulatory
Approvals Necessary for the Merger.................... 19
Risks Arising After the Stockholder Meetings or the
Merger................................................. 20
Clear Channel Will Have More Debt...................... 20
Clear Channel May Need to Repay or Redeem Jacor
Indebtedness After the Merger......................... 20
Our Operations May Be Restricted by Jacor
Indebtedness.......................................... 20
We May Have Difficulties in Combining the Operations of
Clear Channel and Jacor............................... 21
Dependence on Key Personnel of Clear Channel and
Jacor................................................. 21
Our International Operations Have Added Risks.......... 21
Exchange Rates May Cause Future Losses in Clear
Channel's International Operations.................... 22
Extensive Government Regulation May Limit Our
Operations............................................ 22
Government Regulation of Outdoor Advertising May
Adversely Affect Clear Channel's Outdoor Advertising
Operations............................................ 23
Clear Channel's Acquisition Strategy Could Pose
Risks................................................. 24
We Face Intense Competition in the Broadcasting and
Advertising Industries................................ 25
New Technologies May Affect Clear Channel's
Broadcasting Operations............................... 25
Risks to Clear Channel Due to Changes in Restrictions
on Outdoor Tobacco Advertising and Alcohol
Advertising........................................... 26
We Must Successfully Implement Jacor's Strategy to
Develop Underdeveloped Properties..................... 26
Our System Must Be Year 2000 Compliant................. 27
Forward-Looking Statements May Prove Inaccurate............. 28
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 4
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SECTION PAGE
------- ----
<S> <C>
The Special Meetings........................................ 29
Times and Places; Purposes................................ 29
Record Dates; Voting Rights............................... 29
Votes Required............................................ 29
Quorum.................................................... 30
Proxies; Revocation of Proxies............................ 30
Solicitation of Proxies................................... 32
Share Ownership of Management............................. 32
The Merger.................................................. 33
Structure of the Merger................................... 33
Merger Consideration...................................... 33
No Fractional Shares...................................... 34
Effective Time of the Merger.............................. 34
Background of the Merger.................................. 34
Clear Channel Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of
the Clear Channel Board................................ 39
Jacor Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Jacor
Board.................................................. 40
Opinions of Financial Advisors............................ 42
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Clear Channel
Board................................................. 42
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the Jacor Board........ 50
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger................ 59
Employee Benefit Plans................................. 59
Jacor Change in Control Agreements..................... 59
Jacor Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights...... 59
Jacor Stock Units...................................... 60
Equity Group Investments, Inc. Advisory Agreement...... 60
Voting Agreements...................................... 60
Registration Rights Agreement............................. 61
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.............. 62
Anticipated Accounting Treatment.......................... 64
Regulatory Approvals...................................... 64
Percentage Ownership Interest of Jacor Stockholders After
the Merger............................................. 66
Absence of Appraisal Rights............................... 67
Stock Exchange Listing.................................... 67
Certain Consequences of the Merger........................ 67
Management After the Merger............................... 67
Resales of Clear Channel Common Stock..................... 67
Terms of the Merger Agreement............................... 68
Conversion of Shares in the Merger........................ 68
Exchange Agent; Procedures for Exchange of Certificates... 68
Representations and Warranties............................ 69
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger.................... 70
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 5
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SECTION PAGE
------- ----
<S> <C>
Other Covenants........................................... 72
Stockholders' Meetings................................. 72
Access to Information; Confidentiality................. 72
Filings; Other Actions................................. 73
No Solicitation........................................... 73
Conditions to the Merger.................................. 74
The Effect of the Merger on Jacor's Convertible
Securities............................................. 75
Jacor Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights...... 75
Reservation and Registration of Clear Channel Shares... 75
Jacor Stock Units...................................... 76
Jacor Stock Purchase Plans............................. 76
Rights Under Jacor Warrants............................ 76
Rights Under Jacor Liquid Yield Option(TM) Notes....... 77
Employee Matters.......................................... 77
Indemnification of Directors and Officers................. 78
Termination............................................... 79
Fees and Expenses......................................... 80
Termination Fee........................................... 80
Amendment................................................. 81
Waiver.................................................... 81
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial
Statements................................................ 82
Comparison of the Rights of Holders of Jacor Common Stock
and Clear Channel Common Stock............................ 99
Authorized Capital........................................ 99
Number of Directors; Removal; Vacancies................... 99
Charter Amendments........................................ 100
Bylaw Amendments.......................................... 101
Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business... 101
Special Meetings of Stockholders.......................... 101
Cumulative Voting......................................... 102
Stockholder Action Without a Meeting...................... 102
Required Vote for Certain Transactions.................... 102
State Takeover Legislation................................ 103
Standard of Conduct for Directors......................... 104
Indemnification of Directors and Officers................. 105
Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors and
Officers............................................... 107
Appraisal Rights.......................................... 108
Preemptive Rights......................................... 109
Denial of Voting Rights................................... 109
Payment of Dividends...................................... 109
Inspection of Books and Records........................... 109
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 6
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SECTION PAGE
------- ----
<S> <C>
Business of Jacor........................................... 110
Radio Broadcasting........................................ 110
Television Broadcasting................................... 112
Broadcasting Related Services............................. 112
Material Acquisition...................................... 112
Business of Clear Channel................................... 113
Industry Segments......................................... 113
Radio..................................................... 114
Television................................................ 115
Outdoor................................................... 116
Radio Broadcasting........................................ 116
Television Broadcasting................................... 118
Outdoor Advertising....................................... 119
Material Acquisitions..................................... 121
Beneficial Ownership of Jacor Common Stock.................. 122
Beneficial Ownership of Clear Channel Common Stock.......... 124
Experts..................................................... 125
Legal Opinions.............................................. 126
Where You Can Find More Information......................... 127
List of Annexes............................................. 129
ANNEX A Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended
ANNEX B Mays Voting Agreement
ANNEX C Form of Zell Voting Agreements
ANNEX D Registration Rights Agreement
ANNEX E Opinion of Salomon Smith Barney Inc.
ANNEX F Opinion of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
Securities Corporation
</TABLE>
-------------------------
This document incorporates important business and financial information
about Clear Channel and Jacor that is not included in or delivered with this
document. Stockholders may obtain this information from the appropriate company
without charge upon written or oral request to the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Clear Channel Communications, Inc. Jacor Communications, Inc.
200 Concord Plaza, Suite 600 50 East RiverCenter Blvd., 12th Floor
San Antonio, Texas 78216 Covington, Kentucky 41011
Attn: Office of Investor Relations Attn: Corporate Communications and
Tel: (210) 822-2828 Investor Relations
Tel: (606) 655-2267
</TABLE>
If you would like to request documents from us, please do so by March 15,
1999 so that you may receive them before the special stockholder meetings. If
you request any incorporated documents, we will mail them to you by first class
mail or other equally prompt means as soon as practicable after we receive your
request.
<PAGE> 7
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
Q: WHY DO CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR WANT TO MERGE?
A: A trend toward consolidation currently exists in the broadcasting industry.
We want to be a stronger competitive force in the broadcasting industry,
and accordingly, we have sought a strategic alliance between Clear Channel
and Jacor. Clear Channel is one of the world's largest out-of-home
advertising companies and the nation's third largest radio station company
in terms of radio stations. Jacor is the nation's second largest radio
company in terms of radio stations. The combination of Clear Channel and
Jacor should allow greater diversification, create new opportunities for
revenue growth and increase financial strength. For more detailed reasons
for the merger, see pages 39 through 42.
Q: WHAT WILL JACOR COMMON STOCKHOLDERS RECEIVE IN THE MERGER?
A: We will exchange each outstanding share of Jacor common stock for a
specified number of shares of Clear Channel common stock based on an
exchange ratio. Jacor stockholders will not receive any fractional shares.
Instead, they will receive cash based on the market value of a share of
Clear Channel common stock multiplied by the appropriate fraction in lieu
of any fractional shares.
Q: HOW IS THE EXCHANGE RATIO DETERMINED?
A: The exchange ratio is not a fixed number. It will vary depending on the
market price of Clear Channel common stock. We will determine the exchange
ratio by a formula based on the average closing price of Clear Channel
common stock as quoted on the NYSE during the 25 consecutive trading days
ending two trading days before the completion of the merger.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THEN EACH SHARE OF JACOR COMMON STOCK WILL
IF THE CLEAR CHANNEL AVERAGE CONVERT INTO THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF SHARES OF
CLOSING PRICE IS: CLEAR CHANNEL COMMON STOCK:
<S> <C> <C> <C>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than or equal to $42.86 1.40
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Above $42.86 but less 1.40 to 1.35, as determined by dividing
than or equal to $44.44 $60.00 by the Clear Channel average closing
price
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Above $44.44 but less than $50.00 1.35
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$50.00 or above Less than 1.35, as determined by dividing (A)
the sum of (x) $67.50, plus (y) the product
obtained by multiplying $.675 times the amount
by which the Clear Channel average closing
price exceeds $50.00, by (B) the Clear Channel
average closing price.
</TABLE>
1
<PAGE> 8
The following table illustrates how the exchange ratio will fluctuate as
the average closing price of Clear Channel's common stock fluctuates. The
table also shows how the dollar value of the merger consideration for each
share of Jacor common stock may fluctuate. The table assumes that the fair
market value of Clear Channel common stock on the closing date of the
merger is the same as the average closing price of Clear Channel common
stock used to calculate the exchange ratio. Shareholders should note that
the fair market value of Clear Channel common stock on the closing date of
the merger may be significantly different from the average closing price of
Clear Channel common stock used to calculate the exchange ratio. Therefore,
the dollar value of the merger consideration for each share of Jacor common
stock shown in the following table may differ substantially from the dollar
value that may actually be received in exchange for each share of Jacor
common stock.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DOLLAR VALUE OF MERGER
CLEAR CHANNEL AVERAGE CONSIDERATION PER SHARE OF
CLOSING PRICE EXCHANGE RATIO JACOR COMMON STOCK
- --------------------- -------------- --------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
$42.00 1.4000 $58.80
43.00 1.3953 60.00
44.00 1.3636 60.00
45.00 1.3500 60.75
46.00 1.3500 62.10
47.00 1.3500 63.45
48.00 1.3500 64.80
49.00 1.3500 66.15
50.00 1.3500 67.50
51.00 1.3368 68.18
52.00 1.3240 68.85
53.00 1.3118 69.53
54.00 1.3000 70.20
55.00 1.2886 70.88
56.00 1.2777 71.55
57.00 1.2671 72.23
58.00 1.2569 72.90
59.00 1.2470 73.58
60.00 1.2375 74.25
61.00 1.2283 74.93
62.00 1.2194 75.60
</TABLE>
The maximum number of shares of Clear Channel common stock into which we
will convert each share of Jacor common stock will be 1.4. There is no
minimum exchange ratio under the formula.
If you would like up-to-date information on what the exchange ratio would
be as of a date prior to the date of the special stockholders' meetings,
you may call Jacor's proxy solicitor, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., at (800)
322-2885. For more information on how we will determine the exchange ratio,
including examples based on different Clear Channel average closing prices,
see "The Merger -- Merger Consideration" on page 33.
2
<PAGE> 9
Q: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF CLEAR CHANNEL
COMMON STOCK WILL BE RECEIVED BY JACOR STOCKHOLDERS?
A: Assuming an exchange ratio of 1.228,
we estimate that the Jacor stockholders would own approximately 19.2% of
the outstanding Clear Channel common stock after the merger based on the
number of shares of Jacor common stock on February 22, 1999. As the
exchange ratio increases, the post-merger ownership percentage of the Jacor
stockholders will increase.
Q: WILL CLEAR CHANNEL STOCKHOLDERS
RECEIVE ANY SHARES AS A RESULT OF THE MERGER?
A: No. Clear Channel stockholders will
continue to hold the Clear Channel shares they own at the time of the
merger.
Q: WILL THE MERGER DILUTE THE OWNERSHIP OF
CLEAR CHANNEL STOCKHOLDERS?
A: Yes. The issuance of shares of Clear
Channel common stock to Jacor stockholders will dilute the ownership of
existing Clear Channel stockholders. The extent of the dilution will depend
upon the exchange ratio. As the exchange ratio increases, the post-merger
ownership percentage of the Clear Channel stockholders will decrease
relative to the post-merger ownership percentage of the Jacor stockholders.
Q: WHAT ARE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
MERGER TO JACOR AND CLEAR CHANNEL STOCKHOLDERS?
A: The exchange of shares by Jacor
stockholders will be tax-free to them for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
except for taxes payable on any gain recognized as a result of receiving
cash in lieu of fractional shares of Clear Channel common stock. The merger
will have no tax consequences to Clear Channel stockholders. A summary of
the material federal income tax consequences of the merger is included in
the section "The Merger -- Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences" on
page 62.
Q: WHEN DO YOU EXPECT TO COMPLETE THE
MERGER?
A: We hope to complete the merger as
soon as possible after the stockholders' meetings if we obtain the required
stockholder approvals at these meetings. However, we cannot complete the
merger until we satisfy numerous additional conditions. We cannot predict
when we will complete the merger since we do not know when we will satisfy
all of the conditions. For example, the FCC must approve the merger and the
federal and state antitrust authorities must complete the review of the
merger. Final approvals by the FCC and the antitrust authorities likely
will not occur until after the stockholders' meetings. However, either
company can terminate the merger agreement if we do not complete the merger
by October 8, 1999.
Q: WHAT DO I NEED TO DO NOW?
A: After reviewing this document, indicate
on your proxy card how you want to vote, sign it and mail it in the
enclosed return envelope as soon as possible so that the proxyholder may
vote your shares at your stockholders' meeting.
Q: HOW WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED IF I RETURN
A BLANK PROXY CARD?
A: If you sign and send in your proxy card
and do not indicate how you want to vote, we will count your proxy as a
vote in favor of the proposal submitted at your stockholders' meeting.
Q: WHAT WILL BE THE EFFECT IF I DO NOT VOTE?
A: If you are a Jacor stockholder and you
fail to return your proxy card, it will have the same effect as voting
against the merger.
Q: CAN I VOTE MY SHARES IN PERSON?
A: Yes. You may attend your stockholders'
meeting and vote your shares in person,
3
<PAGE> 10
rather than signing and mailing your proxy card.
Q: CAN I REVOKE MY PROXY AND CHANGE MY
VOTE?
A: Yes. You may revoke your proxy on or
before the day of your stockholders' meeting by following the directions on
page 30. Then you can either change your vote or attend your stockholders'
meeting and vote in person.
Q: IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN "STREET NAME"
BY MY BROKER, WILL MY BROKER VOTE MY SHARES FOR ME?
A: Your broker will vote your shares only
if you instruct your broker on how to vote. Your broker will send you
directions on how you can instruct your broker to vote. Your broker cannot
vote your shares without instructions from you.
Q: SHOULD I SEND IN MY STOCK CERTIFICATES
NOW?
A: No. After we complete the merger, we
will send Jacor stockholders written instructions to exchange their stock
certificates. Clear Channel stockholders will retain their stock
certificates after the merger.
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
If you have more questions about the merger you should contact:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
INVESTOR RELATIONS INVESTOR RELATIONS
Clear Channel Communications, Inc. Jacor Communications, Inc.
200 Concord Plaza, Suite 600 50 East RiverCenter Blvd., Suite 1200
San Antonio, Texas 78216 Covington, Kentucky 41011
Attention: Office of Investor Relations Attention: Corporate Communications and
Phone Number: (210) 822-2828 Investor Relations
Fax Number: (210) 822-2299 Phone Number: (606) 655-2267
Fax Number: (606) 655-9345
</TABLE>
If you would like additional copies of this document, if you want updated
information concerning the exchange ratio or if you have other questions about
the merger, you may contact Jacor's proxy solicitor:
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
156 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10010
Toll-Free Number: (800) 322-2885
Collect Phone Number: (212) 929-5500
Fax Number: (212) 929-0308
4
<PAGE> 11
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this document and may not
contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand the terms
of the merger fully and for a more complete description of these terms, you
should read carefully this entire document, including the annexes and the
documents we have referred you to. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on
page 127.
THE COMPANIES (SEE PAGE 110)
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
200 Concord Plaza, Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
(210) 822-2828
Clear Channel is a diversified media company with three primary lines of
business: radio, television and outdoor advertising. As of October 7, 1998,
Clear Channel:
- owned, programmed or sold airtime for 201 domestic radio stations;
- owned or programmed 20 domestic television stations; and
- was one of the world's largest outdoor advertising companies based on its
total estimated revenues.
In addition, Clear Channel has ownership interests in radio station
companies in Australia, New Zealand, Mexico and the Czech Republic. Clear
Channel also owns a 28.7% non-voting equity interest in Heftel Broadcasting
Corporation, a domestic Spanish-language broadcaster.
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
50 East RiverCenter Blvd., Suite 1200
Covington, Kentucky 41011
(606) 655-2267
As of October 7, 1998, Jacor was:
- the second largest radio group in the United States in terms of number of
radio stations;
- the third largest radio group in the nation as measured by revenue; and
- one of the country's leading providers of syndicated radio programming.
As of such date, Jacor owned, had under contract to own, programmed or sold
airtime in 55 markets across the United States for 230 radio stations and one
television station.
Jacor also produces more than 50 syndicated programs and services for more
than 4,000 radio stations, which programs include Rush Limbaugh, The Dr. Laura
Schlessinger Show and Dr. Dean Edell, the top three rated radio programs in the
United States.
OUR RECOMMENDATIONS TO STOCKHOLDERS (SEE PAGE 39)
TO CLEAR CHANNEL STOCKHOLDERS:
THE CLEAR CHANNEL BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES THAT THE MERGER IS ADVISABLE
AND IS IN YOUR BEST INTEREST AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE
CLEAR CHANNEL MERGER PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF CLEAR CHANNEL COMMON
STOCK IN THE MERGER.
TO JACOR STOCKHOLDERS:
THE JACOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES THAT THE MERGER IS ADVISABLE AND IS
IN YOUR BEST INTEREST AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE JACOR
MERGER PROPOSAL TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND APPROVE THE
MERGER.
5
<PAGE> 12
OPINIONS OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS (SEE PAGE 42)
In deciding to approve the merger, we considered opinions from our
respective financial advisors as to the fairness of the exchange ratio from a
financial point of view to the Clear Channel and Jacor stockholders. Clear
Channel received an opinion from Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and Jacor received an
opinion from Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation. These opinions
are attached as Annexes E and F to this document. We encourage you to read and
consider these opinions.
RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGER (SEE PAGE 18)
You should note that once the merger is completed, the combined company is
subject to certain risks as discussed in the section "Risk Factors" on pages 18
through 27 . These risks include,
- the substantial debt service obligations of the combined company after
the merger;
- uncertainty regarding the ability of the combined company to refinance
its debt on acceptable terms; and
- possible difficulties in combining two companies that were previously
operated independently.
THE CLEAR CHANNEL MEETING (SEE PAGE 29)
The special meeting of the Clear Channel stockholders will be held at 200
Concord Plaza, First Floor Conference Room, San Antonio, Texas on March 26,
1999, at 4:00 p.m. local time.
At the Clear Channel meeting, holders of Clear Channel common stock will
consider and vote upon the Clear Channel merger proposal to approve the issuance
of Clear Channel common stock to the Jacor stockholders in the merger.
Approval of the Clear Channel merger proposal requires the affirmative vote
of at least a majority of the votes cast at the Clear Channel meeting by the
holders of Clear Channel common stock entitled to vote at the Clear Channel
meeting.
Only Clear Channel common stockholders who hold Clear Channel common stock
at the close of business on the Clear Channel record date, February 22, 1999,
will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Clear Channel meeting. As of
February 22, 1999, directors and executive officers of Clear Channel and their
affiliates beneficially owned approximately 19.7% of the outstanding shares of
Clear Channel common stock.
In conjunction with the execution of the merger agreement, certain members
of the Mays family who are stockholders of Clear Channel entered into an
agreement with Jacor to vote all Clear Channel common stock under their voting
control in favor of the Clear Channel merger proposal. Together, such Mays
family stockholders have voting control over 30,881,964 shares of Clear Channel
common stock, which represents 11.6% of the outstanding shares of Clear Channel
common stock as of February 22, 1999.
As of February 22, 1999, Clear Channel had a total of 265,991,115 shares of
common stock outstanding.
THE JACOR MEETING (SEE PAGE 29)
The special meeting of the Jacor stockholders will be held at the
Metropolitan Club, 50 East RiverCenter Boulevard, 19th Floor, Covington,
6
<PAGE> 13
Kentucky on March 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. local time.
At the Jacor meeting, holders of Jacor common stock will consider and vote
upon the Jacor merger proposal to approve the merger and approve and adopt the
merger agreement. This approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Jacor common stock.
Only Jacor common stockholders who hold Jacor common stock at the close of
business on the Jacor record date, February 22, 1999, will be entitled to notice
of and to vote at the Jacor meeting. As of February 22, 1999, directors and
executive officers of Jacor and their affiliates beneficially owned
approximately 27.7% of the outstanding shares of Jacor common stock.
In conjunction with the execution of the merger agreement, certain Jacor
stockholders who hold an aggregate of approximately 26.8% of the outstanding
Jacor common stock as of the date of this document entered into voting
agreements with Clear Channel to vote all Jacor common stock under their voting
control in favor of approving the Jacor merger proposal.
As of February 22, 1999, Jacor had a total of 51,512,215 shares of common
stock outstanding.
THE MERGER
The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this document. We encourage
you to read the merger agreement because it is the legal document that governs
the merger.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER (SEE PAGE 74)
We will not complete the merger until we have satisfied numerous
conditions. Some of the conditions are listed below:
- the Clear Channel and Jacor stockholders approve the merger proposals;
- no law or court order prohibits the merger;
- regulatory agencies issue all required approvals under the federal
communications laws;
- the federal and state antitrust authorities complete their review of the
merger; and
- Clear Channel's and Jacor's legal counsel each deliver an opinion that
the merger will be tax-free to Jacor and its stockholders.
Certain conditions may be waived by the company entitled to assert the
condition.
REGULATORY APPROVALS (SEE PAGE 64)
Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, we must furnish
certain information and materials to the Department of Justice and the Federal
Trade Commission and wait a specified period of time before we can complete the
merger. The DOJ or the FTC has the authority to challenge the merger on
antitrust grounds before or after we complete the merger. We filed premerger
notification forms with the DOJ and the FTC on November 3, 1998. On December 3,
1998, we received a second request for additional information and materials from
the DOJ.
In addition, we filed applications with the Federal Communications
Commission on October 16, 1998 seeking its approval
7
<PAGE> 14
of the transfer of control of certain FCC licenses.
Some governmental authorities may seek conditions on the merger before
granting approval. We cannot predict whether we will obtain the required
regulatory approvals within the time frame specified in the merger agreement or
on conditions that would not be detrimental to either of us or the combined
company.
TERMINATION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT (SEE PAGE 79)
The board of directors of both companies can jointly agree to terminate the
merger agreement at any time without completing the merger. In addition, either
company can individually terminate the merger agreement if we do not complete
the merger by October 8, 1999 or the stockholders of either company fail to
approve such company's merger proposal. Jacor also has certain termination
rights if it receives a superior acquisition proposal or when the average
closing price of Clear Channel common stock during a specified period falls
below a stated price. Both companies have multiple additional termination rights
more specifically described in the section "Terms of the Merger
Agreement -- Termination."
Jacor must pay Clear Channel a termination fee of $115 million in certain
circumstances.
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT (SEE PAGE 64)
Clear Channel expects to account for the merger as a purchase. Under this
accounting method, Clear Channel will record Jacor's assets and liabilities at
their fair values, and, if the purchase price exceeds the total of these fair
market values, Clear Channel will record this excess as goodwill. Clear Channel
will include the revenues and expenses of Jacor in Clear Channel's financial
statements from the date of consummation of the merger.
NO APPRAISAL RIGHTS (SEE PAGE 67)
Neither Clear Channel's stockholders nor Jacor's stockholders have any
appraisal rights in connection with the merger.
DIRECTORS OF THE COMBINED ENTITY AFTER THE MERGER (SEE PAGE 67)
The current directors of Clear Channel will not change as a result of the
merger and will therefore become directors of the combined company.
8
<PAGE> 15
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following sets forth summary historical financial data for Clear
Channel for the three years ended December 31, 1997 and the nine month periods
ended September 30, 1997 and 1998. After tax cash flow is net income plus
depreciation, amortization of intangibles (including that of non-consolidated
affiliates) and deferred taxes. EBITDA is net income before interest expense,
income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. You should not consider after
tax cash flow and EBITDA in isolation from, or as a substitute for, or more
meaningful than, operating income, net income or cash flow and other
consolidated income or cash flow statement data computed in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles or as a measure of operating
performance, or as an alternative to operating cash flows as a measure of
liquidity. Although after tax cash flow and EBITDA are not calculated in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, they are widely used
in the media industry as a measure of a company's operating performance because
they assist in comparing performance on a consistent basis across companies
without regard to depreciation and amortization, which can vary significantly
depending on accounting methods, particularly where acquisitions are involved,
or non-operating factors such as historical cost bases.
Acquisitions and dispositions significantly impact the comparability of the
historical consolidated financial data reflected in this financial data. The
results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the
entire fiscal year. This information is only a summary and you should read the
information presented below in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and the Notes thereto for Clear Channel, incorporated into this
document by reference, which qualify the information presented below in its
entirety. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 127.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------------------- -----------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
--------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
DATA:
Net revenue................. $ 250,059 $ 351,739 $ 697,068 $ 469,176 $ 909,555
Operating expenses.......... 137,504 198,332 394,404 266,542 517,562
Depreciation and
amortization.............. 33,769 45,790 114,207 80,216 201,422
Corporate expenses.......... 7,414 8,527 20,883 13,699 25,739
--------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Operating income............ 71,372 99,090 167,574 108,719 164,832
Interest expense............ 20,752 30,080 75,076 51,804 94,555
Other income (expense)...... (803) 2,230 11,579 7,641 13,416
--------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Income before income
taxes..................... 49,817 71,240 104,077 64,556 83,693
Income taxes................ 20,292 28,386 47,116 31,642 48,766
--------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Income before equity income
(loss) of nonconsolidated
affiliates................ 29,525 42,854 56,961 32,914 34,927
Equity in net income (loss)
of nonconsolidated
affiliates................ 2,489 (5,158) 6,615 8,387 10,063
--------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Net income.................. $ 32,014 $ 37,696 $ 63,576 $ 41,301 $ 44,990
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
</TABLE>
9
<PAGE> 16
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------------------- -----------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
--------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income per common share:(1)
Basic..................... $ 0.23 $ 0.26 $ 0.36 $ 0.24 $ 0.19
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
Diluted................... $ 0.23 $ 0.26 $ 0.34 $ 0.23 $ 0.19
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
Weighted average common
shares outstanding(1):
Basic..................... 138,184 146,844 176,960 170,448 231,362
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
Diluted................... 140,140 149,260 183,030 176,443 243,817
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW DATA:
Cash flows from operating
activities............. $ 64,330 $ 107,604 $ 164,820 $ 120,196 $ 214,953
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
Cash flows from investing
activities............. $(159,672) $(796,764) $(1,345,793) $(646,329) $(1,436,897)
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
Cash flows from financing
activities............. $ 93,915 $ 700,470 $ 1,188,929 $ 544,610 $ 1,245,479
========= ========= =========== ========= ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------
1997 1998
-------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents................................ $ 35,178 $ 48,192
Total assets............................................. 92,700 7,261,285
Long-term debt, net of current(2)........................ 503,947 2,980,849
Shareholders' equity..................................... 302,420 3,763,702
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------ -------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OTHER DATA:
After tax cash flow............. $ 71,140 $107,318 $213,445 $137,106 $283,933
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
EBITDA.......................... $106,827 $141,952 $299,975 $204,963 $389,733
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges....................... 3.3 3.6 2.3 2.2 1.9
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Adjusted to reflect two-for-one stock splits effected in December 1996 and
July 1998.
(2) Includes $575 million aggregate principal amount of 2 5/8% senior
convertible notes due April 1, 2003 issued by Clear Channel on March 30,
1998.
10
<PAGE> 17
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following sets forth summary historical financial data for Jacor for
the three years ended December 31, 1997 and the nine month periods ended
September 30, 1997 and 1998. Broadcast cash flow is operating income before
depreciation and amortization, and corporate general and administrative
expenses. EBITDA is net income before extraordinary items, interest expense,
income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. You should not consider
broadcast cash flow and EBITDA in isolation from, or as a substitute for, or
more meaningful than, operating income, net income or cash flow and other
consolidated income or cash flow statement data computed in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles or as a measure of operating
performance, or as an alternative to operating cash flows as a measure of
liquidity. Although broadcast cash flow and EBITDA are not calculated in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, they are widely used
in the media industry as a measure of a company's operating performance because
they assist in comparing station performance on a consistent basis across
companies without regard to depreciation and amortization, which can vary
significantly depending on accounting methods, particularly where acquisitions
are involved, or non-operating factors such as historical cost bases. Broadcast
cash flow also excludes the effect of corporate general and administrative
expenses, which generally do not relate directly to station performance.
Broadcast cash flow margin equals broadcast cash flow as a percentage of net
revenue.
Acquisitions significantly impact the comparability of the historical
consolidated financial data reflected in this financial data. Net of
dispositions and exchanges, Jacor completed acquisitions of 39 radio stations
and one television station in 1996, 88 radio stations in 1997 and 46 radio
stations in the first nine months of 1998. Additionally, Jacor completed the
acquisition of four broadcasting services businesses in 1997. The results of
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal
year. This information is only a summary and you should read the information
presented below in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
the Notes thereto for Jacor, incorporated into this document by reference, which
qualify the information presented below in its entirety. See "Where You Can Find
More Information" on page 127.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------ -------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA
Net revenue...................... $118,891 $223,761 $530,574 $368,941 $530,372
Broadcast operating expenses..... 87,290 151,065 356,783 251,513 356,877
Depreciation and amortization.... 9,483 23,404 78,485 53,097 87,444
Corporate general and
administrative expenses........ 3,501 9,932 14,093 9,240 13,052
Operating income................. 18,617 39,360 81,213 55,091 72,999
Net income (loss)................ 10,965 5,105 (4,052) (5,412) (1,437)
</TABLE>
11
<PAGE> 18
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------------ -------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DATA
Cash provided by operating
activities..................... $ 20,625 $ 24,407 $ 56,040 $ 31,109 $ 64,601
Cash used in investing
activities..................... 64,340 859,264 658,333 487,521 700,105
Cash provided by financing
activities..................... 24,177 905,057 552,880 397,054 648,864
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
-----------------------
1997 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 18,779 $ 42,084
Total assets.............................................. 2,406,532 3,327,668
Long-term debt............................................ 834,500 1,229,565
Shareholders' equity...................................... 912,433 1,179,033
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------- -------------------
1995 1996 1997 1997 1998
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
Broadcast cash flow................ $31,601 $72,696 $173,791 $117,428 $173,495
Broadcast cash flow margin......... 26.6% 32.5% 32.8% 31.8% 32.7%
EBITDA............................. $28,100 $62,764 $159,658 $108,188 $160,443
Capital expenditures............... 4,969 11,852 19,980 12,485 23,354
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges.......................... 5.7 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.2
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE> 19
SUMMARY UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary unaudited pro forma financial data gives effect to
the merger, which we will account for as a purchase in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. The statement of operations data assumes that we
completed the merger at the beginning of the periods presented, and the balance
sheet data assumes that we completed the merger on September 30, 1998. Each
company's pro forma statement of operations data also gives effect to recently
completed acquisitions. The unaudited pro forma combined financial data does not
reflect any cost savings and other synergies which Clear Channel management
anticipates will result from the merger and is not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations or the financial position which would have occurred had
the merger been completed on the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily
indicative of future results of operations or financial position. This
information is only a summary and you should read the information presented
below in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of
Clear Channel and Jacor and the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial
Statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this document.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
CLEAR CLEAR
CHANNEL CHANNEL
CLEAR AND JACOR CLEAR AND JACOR
CHANNEL JACOR PRO FORMA CHANNEL JACOR PRO FORMA
PRO FORMA(1) PRO FORMA(2) FOR MERGER PRO FORMA(3) PRO FORMA(4) FOR MERGER
------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenue.......... $1,273,983 $650,844 $1,924,827 $1,109,521 $589,184 $1,698,705
Operating income..... 199,764 84,515 201,514 165,519 79,064 197,668
Net income (loss)
before
extraordinary
items.............. (36,624) (16,612) (136,001) (92) (6,053) (53,060)
Net income (loss)
before
extraordinary items
per common and
common equivalent
share:(5)
Basic.............. $ (0.17) $ (0.33) $ (0.47) $ (0.00) $ (0.12) (0.17)
Diluted............ $ (0.18) $ (0.33) $ (0.47) $ (0.00) $ (0.12) (0.17)
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding:
Basic.............. $ 218,810 $ 49,348 $ 288,587 $ 244,079 $ 50,133 $ 314,641
Diluted............ $ 225,486 $ 51,051 $ 297,647 $ 256,534 $ 54,347 $ 332,996
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE> 20
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
------------------------------------------
CLEAR CHANNEL
AND JACOR
CLEAR CHANNEL JACOR PRO FORMA
HISTORICAL HISTORICAL FOR MERGER
------------- ---------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets.............................................. $7,261,285 $3,327,668 $12,308,741
Long-term debt, net of current maturities(6).............. 2,405,849 1,229,565 3,635,414
Shareholders' equity...................................... 3,763,702 1,179,033 6,608,893
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Assumes the acquisitions of 93% of the outstanding capital stock of Eller
Media Corporation, the radio and certain outdoor advertising assets of
Paxson Communications Corp., all of the outstanding capital stock of More
Group Plc. and the merger with Universal Outdoor Holdings, Inc. had occurred
on January 1, 1997.
(2) Assumes the acquisitions of Nationwide Communications, Inc., the EFM
Companies and Premiere Radio Networks, Inc. had occurred on January 1, 1997.
(3) Assumes the acquisition of More and the merger with Universal had occurred
on January 1, 1998.
(4) Assumes the acquisition of Nationwide had occurred on January 1, 1998.
(5) Adjusted to reflect the effect of a two-for-one stock split distributed in
July 1998.
(6) Does not include $575 million in senior convertible notes or $356 million in
liquid yield option notes.
14
<PAGE> 21
SUMMARY PER SHARE DATA
We have set forth below historical earnings (loss) per share before
extraordinary items, cash dividends per share and book value per share data of
Jacor and Clear Channel and unaudited pro forma per share data. You should read
the data set forth below in conjunction with the Jacor and Clear Channel audited
financial statements, including the notes thereto, from which we have derived
the data set forth below and which we have incorporated into this document by
reference. You should also read the data in conjunction with the unaudited pro
forma combined condensed financial statements, including the notes thereto,
included elsewhere in this document. See "Where You Can Find More Information"
on page 127.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF OR FOR THE
YEAR ENDED AS OF OR FOR THE
DECEMBER 31, NINE MONTHS ENDED
1997 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
CLEAR CHANNEL -- HISTORICAL
Earnings (loss) per share: basic........... $ 0.36(1) $ 0.19
diluted...... 0.34(1) 0.19
Cash dividends per share................... -- --
Book value per share: basic................ 9.87(1) 16.27
diluted........... 9.54(1) 15.44
JACOR -- HISTORICAL
Earnings (loss) per share: basic........... $(0.10) $(0.03)
diluted...... (0.10) (0.03)
Cash dividends per share................... -- --
Book value per share: basic................ 22.65 23.52
diluted........... 21.73 21.69
PRO FORMA
Earnings (loss) per share: basic........... $(0.47) $(0.17)
diluted...... (0.47) (0.17)
Cash dividends per share................... -- --
Book value per share: basic................ n/a(2) 21.00
diluted........... n/a(2) 19.85
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Adjusted to reflect the effect of a two-for-one stock split distributed on
July 28, 1998 to shareholders of record on July 21, 1998.
(2) This information is not presented since a pro forma balance sheet at
December 31, 1997 is not required.
15
<PAGE> 22
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Clear Channel common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol "CCU." Jacor common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market
under the symbol "JCOR."
The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the
reported high and low sale prices of Clear Channel common stock as reported on
the NYSE and Jacor common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLEAR CHANNEL
COMMON JACOR COMMON
STOCK(1) STOCK
--------------- ---------------
MARKET PRICE MARKET PRICE
--------------- ---------------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
First Quarter.............................. $14.57 $10.25 $22.25 $16.00
Second Quarter............................. 21.50 13.50 31.25 19.50
Third Quarter.............................. 22.28 18.28 35.00 24.75
Fourth Quarter............................. 22.19 15.50 36.38 23.75
1997
First Quarter.............................. 24.81 17.13 31.75 25.63
Second Quarter............................. 31.69 21.38 38.63 26.50
Third Quarter.............................. 34.38 29.31 46.25 37.25
Fourth Quarter............................. 39.72 30.00 55.63 36.50
1998
First Quarter.............................. 50.03 36.72 63.00 46.00
Second Quarter............................. 54.56 44.06 63.63 50.25
Third Quarter.............................. 61.75 40.38 65.25 45.31
Fourth Quarter............................. 54.50 36.13 65.00 36.88
1999
First Quarter (through February 22,
1999)................................... 64.25 53.13 73.13 63.19
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Adjusted to reflect two-for-one stock splits in July 1998 and December 1996.
On October 7, 1998, the last full trading day prior to the public
announcement of the execution and delivery of the merger agreement, the closing
price per share of: (i) Clear Channel common stock was $37.00 and (ii) Jacor
common stock was $40.13. On February 22, 1999, the most recent practicable date
prior to the date of this document, the closing price per share of: (i) Clear
Channel common stock was $57.94 and (ii) Jacor common stock was $67.63. We urge
stockholders to obtain current market quotations before making any decision with
respect to the merger.
Neither Clear Channel nor Jacor has declared a cash dividend on its common
stock since it became a public company. Clear Channel intends to retain future
earnings for use in its business and does not anticipate paying any dividends on
Clear Channel common stock in the foreseeable future. Clear Channel's credit
facility limits its ability to pay
16
<PAGE> 23
dividends, other than dividends payable wholly in Clear Channel capital stock.
Under Jacor's existing credit facilities, Jacor is generally prohibited from
paying cash dividends on Jacor common stock.
There were approximately 629 holders of record of Clear Channel common
stock on the record date for the special meeting of the Clear Channel
stockholders. There were approximately 1,650 holders of record of Jacor common
stock on the record date for the special meeting of the Jacor stockholders.
Following the completion of the merger, shares of Clear Channel common
stock will continue to be traded on the NYSE, and shares of Jacor common stock
will cease to be traded on the Nasdaq National Market. The LYONs and warrants of
Jacor outstanding at the time of the merger will respectively become convertible
into or exercisable for that number of shares of Clear Channel common stock
resulting from multiplying the exchange ratio times the number of shares of
Jacor common stock that the shares and warrants were otherwise respectively
convertible into or exercisable for. The warrants of Jacor will continue to be
traded on the Nasdaq National Market and the LYONs will continue to be traded on
the Nasdaq Stock Market.
17
<PAGE> 24
RISK FACTORS
In making your determination as to how to vote on the merger proposals, you
should consider the following factors:
RISKS RELATING TO THE MERGER
THE MERGER CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY JACOR STOCKHOLDERS IS NOT
DETERMINABLE IN ADVANCE AND COULD SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFER FROM THEIR EXPECTATIONS
The number of shares that Jacor stockholders will receive in the merger
will fluctuate depending on the price of Clear Channel's common stock. The
exchange ratio will not be finalized until the closing date and may change
between now and the closing date. Based on the average closing price of Clear
Channel common stock during the 25 consecutive trading days ending February 22,
1999, the exchange ratio would have been 1.228 shares of Clear Channel common
stock having a value of $71.15 based on the closing price of Clear Channel
common stock on February 22, 1999 of $57.94.
THE CAP ON THE EXCHANGE RATIO COULD RESULT IN A SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION IN THE
VALUE OF THE MERGER CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY JACOR STOCKHOLDERS
The merger agreement caps the exchange ratio at 1.4 when the average
closing price of Clear Channel common stock falls below $42.86 per share. Thus,
Jacor stockholders cannot receive more than 1.4 shares of Clear Channel common
stock in exchange for each share of Jacor common stock regardless of how much
the average closing price of Clear Channel common stock falls below $42.86 per
share.
THE MERGER MAY BE TERMINATED IF CLEAR CHANNEL'S STOCK PRICE FALLS SUBSTANTIALLY
If the average closing price of Clear Channel's common stock falls below
$37.50, Jacor's board of directors has the authority to terminate the merger
agreement.
THE COMBINED COMPANY WILL HAVE PRO FORMA LOSSES
On a pro forma basis, giving effect to the acquisitions Clear Channel
completed in 1998, Clear Channel had a loss for the nine months ended September
30, 1998, and for the year ended December 31, 1997. In addition, if the merger
had been completed, the pro forma losses during these periods would have been
substantially greater. Because of the substantial amortization of goodwill
related to the merger and prior acquisitions, Clear Channel expects such losses
to continue. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Statements."
CLEAR CHANNEL STOCKHOLDERS WILL BE DILUTED BY THE MERGER
The merger will dilute the ownership position of the present stockholders
of Clear Channel. The extent of the dilution will depend upon the exchange
ratio. Because the exchange ratio will not be finalized until the closing date,
Clear Channel stockholders could experience a greater degree of dilution than
anticipated at the time they vote upon the merger if the price of Clear Channel
common stock drops prior to the closing date.
18
<PAGE> 25
Based on the number of shares of Jacor common stock outstanding on the date
of this document and assuming an exchange ratio of 1.228, Clear Channel will
issue to Jacor stockholders approximately 63,257,000 shares of Clear Channel
common stock in the merger. As a result, Jacor stockholders will hold
approximately 19.2% of the Clear Channel common stock outstanding after the
completion of the merger.
WE MAY NEED TO DIVEST ASSETS AND AGREE TO ONGOING OPERATING RESTRICTIONS TO
OBTAIN ANTITRUST REGULATORY APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE MERGER
Certain antitrust regulatory agencies must complete their reviews before we
can complete the merger. We can give no assurance that such agencies will either
complete these reviews in a timely manner or do so without imposing significant
restrictions or conditions.
Federal and state antitrust agencies reviewing the merger could challenge
all or certain aspects of the merger by seeking to block the merger in court or
impose conditions on the merger. A court could issue an injunction before or
after the stockholders' meetings. Clear Channel may have to divest or cause
Jacor to divest certain properties in order to obtain these approvals.
WE MAY NEED TO DIVEST ASSETS AND AGREE TO ONGOING OPERATING RESTRICTIONS TO
OBTAIN FCC REGULATORY APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR THE MERGER
We must receive certain FCC regulatory approvals before we can complete the
merger. We can give no assurance that we will either obtain these approvals or
obtain them without significant restrictions or conditions.
On October 16, 1998, we filed an application seeking the FCC's consent to
the transfer of control of Jacor from the stockholders of Jacor to Clear
Channel. In five areas, overlap between Jacor and Clear Channel radio stations
will exceed the numerical limits established in the Telecommunications Act of
1996 on the total number of stations any company may own in a particular area.
In the merger agreement Clear Channel agreed to take certain actions, including
divesting radio stations, in order to obtain timely approval of the merger.
Clear Channel and Jacor will be required to divest assets and may be forced to
agree to various operating restrictions in order to obtain approval for the
merger. As of the date of this document, Clear Channel has entered into letters
of intent to divest six radio stations in Florida and six radio stations in
Ohio. In addition, Jacor has entered into letters of intent to divest one radio
station in Florida and five radio stations in Kentucky. We may propose
additional divestitures.
The merger also implicates the FCC's "one-to-a-market" rule. This rule
prohibits a company from owning or controlling a television station and radio
station(s) in the same market. The FCC has separately granted Clear Channel and
Jacor temporary conditional waivers of the rule to permit television and radio
ownership in Jacksonville and Cincinnati. Clear Channel has requested continuing
waivers of the "one-to-a-market" rule in Jacksonville and Cincinnati. If
granted, the FCC would condition such waivers upon the outcome of the FCC's
ongoing consideration of the future of the "one-to-a-market" rule. Any changes
to the "one-to-a-market" rule could adversely affect both the merger and the
operations of Clear Channel after the merger. Such changes could also force
Clear
19
<PAGE> 26
Channel to divest either its radio or television stations in Cincinnati and
Jacksonville. See "-- Post Merger Risks -- Government Regulation May Limit Our
Operations."
Any divestitures could be material. Any divestitures may not be at a fair
market price and the reinvestment of the proceeds from any divestitures may not
produce for us operating profit at the same level as the divested assets. Any
operating restrictions could adversely affect our value. See "The
Merger -- Regulatory Approvals."
RISKS ARISING AFTER THE STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS OR THE MERGER
CLEAR CHANNEL WILL HAVE MORE DEBT
Following the merger, Clear Channel's debt obligations will significantly
increase. Clear Channel currently uses a significant portion of its operating
income for debt service. Clear Channel's leverage after the merger could make it
vulnerable to an increase in interest rates or a downturn in the operating
performance of its broadcast properties or outdoor advertising properties or a
decline in general economic conditions. At September 30, 1998, Clear Channel had
borrowings under its credit facility and other long term debt outstanding of
approximately $2.98 billion and shareholders' equity of $3.76 billion. Clear
Channel expects to continue to borrow funds to finance acquisitions of
broadcasting and outdoor advertising properties, as well as for other purposes.
Clear Channel may borrow up to $2 billion under its domestic credit facility at
floating rates equal to the London InterBank Offered Rate plus 0.50%. As of
December 31, 1998, Clear Channel had borrowed approximately $1.01 billion under
its domestic credit facility. At September 30, 1998, Jacor had total outstanding
indebtedness of approximately $1.53 billion, including publicly traded notes and
LYONs, and stockholders' equity of approximately $1.18 billion.
CLEAR CHANNEL MAY NEED TO REPAY OR REDEEM JACOR INDEBTEDNESS AFTER THE MERGER
Substantially all of Jacor's indebtedness could become payable upon
completion of the merger. At September 30, 1998, Jacor had total outstanding
indebtedness of approximately $1.53 billion, including publicly traded notes in
the aggregate principal amount of $539.6 million and LYONs which had an
aggregate accreted value of $302 million. Jacor's credit facility will become
payable as a result of the merger. The merger will also trigger the change in
control provisions of the Jacor notes and the Jacor LYONs. Clear Channel must
offer to purchase the outstanding Jacor notes for consideration equal to 101% of
the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Clear Channel must
also offer to purchase the outstanding Jacor LYONs. In the event that the
holders require that Clear Channel purchase all or a substantial portion of the
Jacor notes and Jacor LYONs, there can be no assurance that Clear Channel would
have the funds available to satisfy such obligations.
OUR OPERATIONS MAY BE RESTRICTED BY JACOR INDEBTEDNESS
If all or part of the Jacor indebtedness remains outstanding after the
merger because either the Jacor debt holders do not accept Clear Channel's
mandatory offers to purchase
20
<PAGE> 27
such indebtedness or Clear Channel does not otherwise purchase such indebtedness
on acceptable terms, the terms of such indebtedness may restrict the ability of
Clear Channel's merger subsidiary which succeeds to the Jacor business and its
subsidiaries to make funds available to Clear Channel in the form of dividends,
loans, advances or otherwise. Much of Jacor's indebtedness is high yield
indebtedness and restricts Jacor and its subsidiaries from incurring additional
indebtedness, selling assets or stock, engaging in asset swaps, mergers or
consolidations and entering into transactions with affiliates. The covenants for
this type of indebtedness are more restrictive than those contained in Clear
Channel's public indebtedness. In addition, if Jacor's credit facility remains
in place, Clear Channel's merger subsidiary which succeeds to the Jacor business
will be subject to a number of financial covenants, including interest coverage,
debt service coverage and a maximum ratio of debt to earnings before other
expenses (income), interest expenses, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
Clear Channel's credit facility also contains numerous restrictions, including
limitations on capital expenditures, the incurrence of additional indebtedness,
payment of cash dividends, and requirements to maintain certain financial
ratios. Accordingly, Jacor's indebtedness which remains outstanding after the
merger may:
- cause Clear Channel to incur substantial consolidated interest expense
and principal repayment obligations;
- limit Clear Channel's ability to obtain additional debt financing;
- make it more difficult for Clear Channel to combine its operations with
Jacor's; and
- place more restrictions on Clear Channel's ability to manage Jacor than
Clear Channel currently faces in the management of the rest of its
business.
WE MAY HAVE DIFFICULTIES IN COMBINING THE OPERATIONS OF CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
Clear Channel may not be able to successfully combine the operations of
Jacor with its own operations. Any unexpected delays or costs of combining the
two companies could adversely affect Clear Channel and disrupt its operations.
Additionally, the operations, management and personnel of the two companies may
not be compatible. Following the merger, Clear Channel may experience the loss
of key personnel.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL OF CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
Each of Clear Channel's and Jacor's business is dependent upon the
performance of certain key employees, including their chief executive officers
and other executive officers. Clear Channel and Jacor also employ or
independently contract with several on-air personalities and hosts of syndicated
radio programs with significant loyal audiences in their respective markets.
Although Clear Channel and Jacor have entered into long-term agreements with
certain of their executive officers, key on-air talent and program hosts to
protect their interests in those relationships, we can give no assurance that
after the merger all such key personnel will remain with us or will retain their
audiences.
OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS HAVE ADDED RISKS
Doing business in foreign countries carries with it certain risks that are
not found in doing business in the United States. Clear Channel currently
derives a portion of its
21
<PAGE> 28
revenues from international radio and outdoor operations in Europe, Mexico,
Australia and New Zealand. The risks of doing business in foreign countries
which could result in losses against which Clear Channel is not insured include:
- potential adverse changes in the diplomatic relations of foreign
countries with the United States;
- hostility from local populations;
- the adverse effect of currency exchange controls;
- restrictions on the withdrawal of foreign investment and earnings;
- government policies against businesses owned by foreigners;
- expropriations of property;
- the potential instability of foreign governments;
- the risk of insurrections;
- risks of renegotiation or modification of existing agreements with
governmental authorities;
- foreign exchange restrictions; and
- changes in taxation structure.
EXCHANGE RATES MAY CAUSE FUTURE LOSSES IN CLEAR CHANNEL'S INTERNATIONAL
OPERATIONS
Because Clear Channel owns assets overseas and derives revenues from its
international operations, Clear Channel may incur currency translation losses
due to changes in the values of foreign currencies and in the value of the U.S.
dollar. Clear Channel cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations
upon future operating results. To reduce its exposure to the risk of
international currency fluctuations, Clear Channel maintains a hedge by
incurring amounts of debt in each currency approximately equivalent to Clear
Channel's net assets in each such currency. Clear Channel reviews this hedge
position monthly. Clear Channel currently maintains no other derivative
instruments to reduce the exposure to translation and/or transaction risk but
may adopt other hedging strategies in the future.
EXTENSIVE GOVERNMENT REGULATION MAY LIMIT OUR OPERATIONS
BROADCASTING. The federal government extensively regulates the domestic
broadcasting industry, and any changes in the current regulatory scheme could
significantly affect Clear Channel. Clear Channel's broadcasting business
depends upon maintaining broadcasting licenses issued by the FCC for maximum
terms of eight years. Renewals of broadcasting licenses can be attained only
through the FCC's grant of appropriate applications. Although the FCC rarely
denies a renewal application, the FCC could deny future renewal applications.
Such a denial could adversely affect Clear Channel's operations.
The federal communications laws limit the number of broadcasting properties
Clear Channel or Jacor may own in a particular area. While the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 relaxed the FCC's multiple ownership limits, any
subsequent modifications that tighten those limits could adversely affect the
merger or Clear Channel following the
22
<PAGE> 29
merger by making it impossible for Clear Channel to complete the acquisition of
certain stations in the merger or other potential acquisitions or requiring
Clear Channel to divest stations it has already acquired.
Moreover, changes in governmental regulations and policies may have a
material impact upon Clear Channel. For example, Clear Channel currently
provides programming to several television stations it does not own and receives
programming from other parties for certain television stations it does own.
These programming arrangements are made through contracts known as local
marketing agreements. The FCC is currently considering revisions to its policy
regarding television local marketing agreements. These revisions could restrict
Clear Channel's ability to enter into television local marketing agreements in
the future, as well as require Clear Channel to terminate its programming
arrangements under existing local marketing agreements.
ANTITRUST. Additional acquisitions by Clear Channel of radio and television
stations and outdoor advertising properties will require antitrust review by the
federal antitrust agencies, and we can give no assurances that the DOJ or the
FTC will not seek to bar Clear Channel from acquiring additional radio or
television stations or outdoor advertising properties in any market where Clear
Channel already has a significant position. Following the passage of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996, the DOJ has become more aggressive in reviewing
proposed acquisitions of radio stations, particularly in instances where the
proposed acquiror already owns one or more radio station properties in a
particular market and seeks to acquire another radio station in the same market.
The DOJ has, in some cases, obtained consent decrees requiring radio station
divestitures in a particular market based on allegations that acquisitions would
lead to unacceptable concentration levels. The DOJ also actively reviews
proposed acquisitions of outdoor advertising properties. In addition, the
antitrust laws of foreign jurisdictions will apply if Clear Channel acquires
international broadcasting properties.
ENVIRONMENTAL. As the owner or operator of various real properties and
facilities, especially in Clear Channel's outdoor advertising operations, Clear
Channel and Jacor must comply with various federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations. Historically, neither Clear Channel nor
Jacor has incurred significant expenditures to comply with these laws. However,
additional environmental laws passed in the future or a finding of a violation
of existing laws could require the combined company to make significant
expenditures.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF OUTDOOR ADVERTISING MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT CLEAR
CHANNEL'S OUTDOOR ADVERTISING OPERATIONS
The outdoor advertising industry is subject to extensive governmental
regulation at the federal, state and local level and compliance with existing
and future regulations could have a significant financial impact on Clear
Channel. Federal law, principally the Highway Beautification Act of 1965,
encourages states to implement legislation to restrict billboards located within
660 feet of, or visible from, highways except in commercial or industrial areas.
Every state has implemented regulations at least as restrictive as the Highway
Beautification Act, including a ban on the construction of new billboards along
federally-aided highways and the removal of any illegal signs on these highways
at the owner's expense and without any compensation.
23
<PAGE> 30
States and local jurisdictions have, in some cases, passed additional
regulations on the construction, size, location and, in some instances,
advertising content of outdoor advertising structures adjacent to
federally-aided highways and other thoroughfares. From time to time governmental
authorities order the removal of billboards by the exercise of eminent domain
and certain jurisdictions have also adopted amortization of billboards in
varying forms. Amortization permits the billboard owner to operate its billboard
only as a non-conforming use for a specified period of time, after which it must
remove or otherwise conform its billboards to the applicable regulations at its
own cost without any compensation. Clear Channel or its acquired companies have
agreed to remove certain billboards in Jacksonville, Florida. Furthermore,
Tampa, Houston and San Francisco, which are municipalities within Clear
Channel's existing markets, have adopted amortization ordinances. Clear Channel
can give no assurance that it will be successful in negotiating acceptable
arrangements in circumstances in which its displays are subject to removal or
amortization, and what effect, if any, such regulations may have on its
operations.
In addition, we are unable to predict what additional regulations may be
imposed on outdoor advertising in the future. Legislation regulating the content
of billboard advertisements and additional billboard restrictions have been
introduced in Congress from time to time in the past. Changes in laws and
regulations affecting outdoor advertising at any level of government, including
laws of the foreign jurisdictions in which Clear Channel operates, could have a
material adverse effect on Clear Channel.
CLEAR CHANNEL'S ACQUISITION STRATEGY COULD POSE RISKS
OPERATIONAL RISKS. Clear Channel intends to grow through the acquisition of
broadcasting companies and assets, outdoor advertising companies, individual
outdoor advertising display faces, and other assets that Clear Channel believes
will assist its customers in marketing their products and services. Clear
Channel's acquisition strategy involves numerous risks, including:
- Certain of such acquisitions may prove unprofitable and fail to generate
anticipated cash flows;
- To successfully manage a rapidly expanding and significantly larger
portfolio of broadcasting and outdoor advertising properties, Clear
Channel may need to recruit additional senior management and expand
corporate infrastructure;
- Clear Channel may encounter difficulties in the integration of operations
and systems;
- Management's attention may be diverted from other business concerns; and
- Clear Channel may lose key employees of acquired companies or stations.
Clear Channel frequently evaluates strategic opportunities both within and
outside its existing lines of business. Clear Channel expects from time to time
to pursue additional acquisitions and may decide to dispose of certain
businesses. Such acquisitions or dispositions could be material. See "Business
of Clear Channel -- Material Acquisitions" on page 121. The merger agreement
does not prohibit Clear Channel from entering into acquisition agreements or
completing acquisitions, nor does it require Clear Channel to obtain the consent
of Jacor prior to entering into acquisition agreements or completing
24
<PAGE> 31
acquisitions, except for acquisitions that would hinder or delay the receipt of
approvals needed for the merger or affect Clear Channel's ability to complete
the merger.
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR ADDITIONAL ACQUISITION. Clear Channel
will face stiff competition from other broadcasting and outdoor advertising
companies for acquisition opportunities. If the prices sought by sellers of
these companies continue to rise, Clear Channel may find fewer acceptable
acquisition opportunities. In addition, the purchase price of possible
acquisitions could require additional debt or equity financing on the part of
Clear Channel. Clear Channel can give no assurance that it will obtain the
needed financing or that it will obtain such financing on attractive terms. See
"-- Clear Channel Will Have More Debt," "-- Clear Channel May Need to Repay or
Redeem Jacor Indebtedness After the Merger," and "-- Our Operations May Be
Restricted by Jacor Indebtedness." Additional indebtedness could increase Clear
Channel's leverage and make Clear Channel more vulnerable to economic downturns
and may limit its ability to withstand competitive pressures. Additional equity
financing could result in dilution to Clear Channel's stockholders.
WE FACE INTENSE COMPETITION IN THE BROADCASTING AND ADVERTISING INDUSTRIES
Clear Channel's three business segments are in highly competitive
industries, and Clear Channel may not be able to maintain or increase its
current audience ratings and advertising revenues. Clear Channel's radio and
television stations and outdoor advertising properties compete for audiences and
advertising revenues with other radio and television stations and outdoor
advertising companies, as well as with other media, such as newspapers,
magazines, cable television, and direct mail, within their respective markets.
Audience ratings and market shares are subject to change, which could have an
adverse effect on Clear Channel's revenues in that market. Other variables that
could affect Clear Channel's financial performance include:
- economic conditions, both general and relative to the broadcasting
industry;
- shifts in population and other demographics;
- the level of competition for advertising dollars;
- fluctuations in operating costs;
- technological changes and innovations;
- changes in labor conditions; and
- changes in governmental regulations and policies and actions of federal
regulatory bodies.
NEW TECHNOLOGIES MAY AFFECT CLEAR CHANNEL'S BROADCASTING OPERATIONS
The FCC is considering ways to introduce new technologies to the radio
broadcast industry, including satellite and terrestrial delivery of digital
audio broadcasting and the standardization of available technologies which
significantly enhance the sound quality of AM broadcasts. Clear Channel is
unable to predict the effect such technologies will have on its broadcasting
operations, but the capital expenditures necessary to implement such
technologies could be substantial. Clear Channel also faces risks in
implementing the
25
<PAGE> 32
conversion of its television stations to digital television, which the FCC has
ordered and for which it has established a timetable. Clear Channel will incur
considerable expense in the conversion to digital television and is unable to
predict the extent or timing of consumer demand for any such digital television
services. Moreover, the FCC may impose additional public service obligations on
television broadcasters in return for their use of digital television spectrum.
This could add to Clear Channel's operational costs. The most contentious issue
yet to be resolved is the extent to which cable systems will be required to
carry broadcasters' new digital channels. Clear Channel's television stations
are highly dependent on their carriage by cable systems in the areas they serve.
Thus, FCC rules that impose no or limited obligations on cable systems to carry
the digital television signals of television broadcast stations in their local
markets could adversely affect Clear Channel's television operations.
RISKS TO CLEAR CHANNEL DUE TO CHANGES IN RESTRICTIONS ON OUTDOOR TOBACCO
ADVERTISING AND ALCOHOL ADVERTISING
Regulations, potential legislation and recent settlement agreements related
to outdoor tobacco advertising could have a material adverse effect on Clear
Channel after the merger. The major U.S. tobacco companies that are defendants
in numerous class action suits throughout the country recently reached an
out-of-court settlement with 46 states that includes a ban on outdoor
advertising of tobacco products. The settlement agreement was finalized on
November 23, 1998, but must be ratified by the courts in each of the 46 states
participating in the settlement. In addition to the mass settlement, the tobacco
industry previously had come to terms with the remaining four states
individually. The terms of such individual settlements also included bans on
outdoor advertising of tobacco products. The elimination of billboard
advertising by the tobacco industry will cause a reduction in Clear Channel's
direct revenues from such advertisers and may simultaneously increase the
available space on the existing inventory of billboards in the outdoor
advertising industry. This industry-wide increase in space may in turn result in
a lowering of outdoor advertising rates or limit the ability of industry
participants to increase rates for some period of time. For the nine months
ended September 30, 1998, approximately 4% of Clear Channel's revenues came from
the outdoor advertising of tobacco products.
In addition to the settlement agreements, state and local governments are
also regulating the outdoor advertising of alcohol and tobacco products. For
example, several states and cities have laws restricting tobacco billboard
advertising near schools and other locations frequented by children. Some cities
have proposed even broader restrictions, including complete bans on outdoor
tobacco advertising on billboards, kiosks, and private business window displays.
It is possible that state and local governments may propose or pass similar
ordinances to limit outdoor advertising of alcohol and other products or
services in the future. Legislation regulating tobacco and alcohol advertising
has also been introduced in a number of European countries in which Clear
Channel conducts business, and could have a similar impact.
WE MUST SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENT JACOR'S STRATEGY TO DEVELOP UNDERDEVELOPED
PROPERTIES
Following the merger, we may not be able to improve the performance of our
portfolio of underdeveloped properties. Part of Jacor's business strategy has
been to improve the
26
<PAGE> 33
broadcast cash flow and ratings of its underdeveloped properties that had
insignificant broadcast cash flow or insignificant ratings. In evaluating
acquisition opportunities, Jacor sought out underdeveloped properties because
Jacor believed that such radio stations provide the potential for the greatest
improvement in broadcast cash flow. Typically, Jacor will make a substantial
investment in an underdeveloped property to improve its programming operations
and/or signal. Approximately one-half of Jacor's portfolio of radio stations
currently represent underdeveloped properties. We can give no assurance that
Jacor, or the combined company following the merger, will be successful in
improving the performance of these underdeveloped properties, even if we incur
substantial costs in implementing this aspect of our business strategy.
OUR SYSTEM MUST BE YEAR 2000 COMPLIANT
Clear Channel and Jacor are exposed to the risk that the year 2000 issue
could cause system failures or miscalculations in their respective broadcast,
outdoor and corporate locations which could cause disruptions of operations,
including, among other things, a temporary inability to produce broadcast
signals, process financial transactions, or engage in similar normal business
activities. As a result, Clear Channel and Jacor have determined that they will
be required to modify or replace portions of their software and certain hardware
so that those systems will properly utilize dates beyond December 31, 1999.
Clear Channel and Jacor presently believe that with modifications or
replacements of existing software and certain hardware, the year 2000 issue can
be mitigated. To date, the amounts incurred and expensed for developing and
carrying out the plans to complete the year 2000 modifications have not had a
material effect on Clear Channel's or Jacor's operations. Clear Channel and
Jacor plan to complete the year 2000 modifications, including testing, by July
1, 1999. The total remaining cost for addressing year 2000 is not expected to be
material to Clear Channel's or Jacor's operations. See "Item 2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Year
2000" included in Clear Channel's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1998, incorporated by reference into this document, and see
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Year 2000 Computer System Compliance" included in Jacor's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998,
incorporated by reference into this document. If such modifications and
replacements are not made, are not completed on time or are insufficient to
prevent systems failures or other disruptions, the year 2000 issue could have a
material impact on the operations of Clear Channel and Jacor.
In addition, the possibility of interruption exists in the event that the
information systems of Clear Channel's or Jacor's significant vendors are not
year 2000 compliant. The inability of such vendors to complete their year 2000
resolution process in a timely fashion could materially impact Clear Channel and
Jacor. The effect of non-compliance by such vendors is not determinable. In
addition, disruptions in the economy generally resulting from the year 2000
issues could also materially adversely affect Clear Channel and Jacor. Clear
Channel and Jacor could be subject to litigation for computer systems failure,
for example, equipment shutdown or failure to properly date business records.
The amount of potential liability and lost revenue cannot be reasonably
estimated at this time.
27
<PAGE> 34
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MAY PROVE INACCURATE
This document contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 about Clear
Channel, Jacor and the combined company. Although we believe that, in making any
such statements, our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such
statement may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and
results to be materially different from those projected. When used in this
document, the words "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "intends," and similar
expressions, as they relate to Clear Channel, Jacor or the combined company or
our respective managements, are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in forward-looking statements, certain of which are beyond
the control of Clear Channel, Jacor or the combined company, include:
- the impact of general economic conditions in the U.S. and in other
countries in which Clear Channel currently does business;
- industry conditions, including competition;
- fluctuations in exchange rates and currency values;
- capital expenditure requirements;
- legislative or regulatory requirements;
- interest rates;
- taxes; and
- access to capital markets.
The actual results, performance or achievements by Clear Channel, Jacor or
the combined company could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied
by, these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that any
of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will occur or, if
any of them do, what impact they will have on Clear Channel, Jacor or the
combined company.
28
<PAGE> 35
THE SPECIAL MEETINGS
This document is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies
from the Clear Channel common stockholders by the Clear Channel board for use at
the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting and the Jacor common stockholders by the
Jacor board for use at the Jacor stockholders' meeting.
TIMES AND PLACES; PURPOSES
The Clear Channel stockholders' meeting will be held on March 26, 1999, at
4:00 p.m., local time, at 200 Concord Plaza, First Floor Conference Room, San
Antonio, Texas. The purpose of the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting is to
consider and vote upon the Clear Channel merger proposal to approve the issuance
of shares of Clear Channel common stock in the merger and to transact any other
business which properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement. The bylaws of Clear Channel prohibit the transaction of any
business at a special meeting of stockholders other than the business specified
in the notice of special meeting.
The Jacor stockholders' meeting will be held on March 26, 1999, at 10:00
a.m., local time, at the Metropolitan Club, 50 East RiverCenter Boulevard, 19th
Floor, Covington, Kentucky. The purpose of the Jacor stockholders' meeting is to
consider and vote upon the Jacor merger proposal to approve and adopt the merger
agreement and approve the merger and to transact any other business which
properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement. The bylaws
of Jacor prohibit the transaction of any business at a special meeting of
stockholders other than the business specified in the notice of special meeting.
RECORD DATES; VOTING RIGHTS
Clear Channel. Only holders of record of Clear Channel common stock at the
close of business on February 22, 1999 are entitled to receive notice of and to
vote at the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting. At the close of business on
February 22, 1999, there were 265,991,115 shares of Clear Channel common stock
outstanding. Each share of Clear Channel common stock is entitled to one vote at
the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting.
Jacor. Only holders of record of Jacor common stock at the close of
business on February 22, 1999 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at
the Jacor stockholders' meeting. At the close of business on February 22, 1999,
there were 51,512,215 shares of Jacor common stock outstanding. Each share of
Jacor common stock is entitled to one vote at the Jacor stockholders' meeting.
VOTES REQUIRED
Clear Channel. The rules governing companies listed on the NYSE require
listed companies to obtain stockholder approval before issuing additional shares
of common stock if the number of additional shares proposed to be issued exceeds
20% of the shares outstanding before the issuance. Under these rules, the
issuance of Clear Channel common stock to the Jacor stockholders in the merger
requires the approval of a majority of votes cast on the Clear Channel merger
proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the Clear Channel merger
proposal exceeds 50% of the votes eligible to be cast on the proposal.
29
<PAGE> 36
Jacor. Delaware law and Jacor's certificate of incorporation require the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Jacor
common stock for the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and approval
of the merger.
QUORUM
Clear Channel. The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a
majority of the Clear Channel common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to
vote at the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting will constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business. The shares of Clear Channel common stock present at the
Clear Channel stockholders' meeting that abstain from voting or that are the
subject of broker non-votes will be counted as present for the purpose of
determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding stock for
a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular matter because the nominee does
not have discretionary voting power with respect to the matter and has not
received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. If a quorum is not
present at the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting, the Clear Channel board will
likely adjourn or postpone the meeting to solicit additional proxies.
Jacor. The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of
the Jacor common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Jacor
stockholders' meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
The shares of Jacor common stock present at the Jacor stockholders' meeting that
abstain from voting or that are the subject of broker non-votes will be counted
as present for the purpose of determining a quorum and will have the effect of a
vote against the Jacor merger proposal. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee
holding stock for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular matter
because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to the
matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. If a
quorum is not present at the Jacor stockholders' meeting, the Jacor board will
likely adjourn or postpone the meeting to solicit additional proxies.
PROXIES; REVOCATION OF PROXIES
Clear Channel. The Clear Channel board is soliciting proxies for the Clear
Channel stockholders' meeting to enable its stockholders to vote upon the Clear
Channel merger proposal, whether or not they attend the Clear Channel
stockholders' meeting. For all shares of Clear Channel common stock represented
by a properly executed proxy received before or at the Clear Channel
stockholders' meeting, the proxy holders will vote in accordance with the
instructions on the proxies. If no voting instructions are indicated on a proxy,
then the proxy holders will vote the shares represented by the proxy in favor of
the Clear Channel merger proposal.
In addition, the proxy holders will have discretion to vote on any matters
properly presented at the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting. If Clear Channel
proposes to adjourn the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting, the proxy holders
will vote all shares for which they have voting authority in favor of
adjournment, except for those shares that were voted against the Clear Channel
merger proposal. The Clear Channel board requests Clear Channel stockholders to
complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed
postage-prepaid envelope. Brokers who hold shares of Clear Channel common stock
as nominees will not have discretionary authority to vote the shares in the
30
<PAGE> 37
absence of instructions from the beneficial owners. Broker non-votes will not be
counted as votes cast with respect to, will not count as votes cast for or
against, and will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary
for approval of the Clear Channel merger proposal.
A Clear Channel stockholder may revoke its proxy at any time before the
proxy is exercised by filing a revoking instrument with the secretary of Clear
Channel or by executing another proxy bearing a later date. A Clear Channel
stockholder who executed a proxy may suspend the powers of the proxy holders
with respect to his shares by attending the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting
in person and voting or requesting the suspension. Attendance at the Clear
Channel stockholders' meeting will not, in itself, revoke a proxy.
If the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting is postponed or adjourned for
any reason, at any subsequent reconvening of the Clear Channel stockholders'
meeting, the proxy holders will vote all shares represented by a proxy in the
same manner as they would have been voted at the initial convening of the Clear
Channel stockholders' meeting, even if they were voted on the same or any other
matter at a previous meeting. However, the proxy holders will not vote those
shares represented by a proxy which was revoked or withdrawn before the
reconvened meeting.
Jacor. The Jacor board is soliciting proxies for the Jacor stockholders'
meeting to enable its stockholders to vote upon the Jacor merger proposal,
whether or not they attend the Jacor stockholders' meeting. For all shares of
Jacor common stock represented by a properly executed proxy received before or
at the Jacor stockholders' meeting, the proxy holders will vote in accordance
with the instructions on the proxies. If no voting instructions are indicated on
a proxy, then the proxy holders will vote the shares represented by the proxy in
favor of approval and adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the
merger.
In addition, the proxy holders will have discretion to vote on any matters
properly presented at the Jacor stockholders' meeting. If Jacor proposes to
adjourn the Jacor stockholders' meeting, the proxy holders will vote all shares
for which they have voting authority in favor of adjournment, except for those
shares that were voted against the Jacor merger proposal. The Jacor board
requests Jacor stockholders to complete, sign, date and promptly return the
enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. Brokers who hold
shares of Jacor common stock as nominees will not have discretionary authority
to vote the shares in the absence of instructions from the beneficial owners.
Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast, but will have the same
effect as votes cast against the Jacor merger proposal.
A Jacor stockholder may revoke its proxy at any time before the proxy is
exercised by filing a revoking instrument with the secretary of Jacor or by
executing another proxy bearing a later date. A Jacor stockholder who executed a
proxy may suspend the powers of the proxy holders with respect to his shares by
attending the Jacor stockholders' meeting in person and voting or requesting the
suspension. Attendance at the Jacor stockholders' meeting will not, in itself,
revoke a proxy.
If Jacor stockholders make a proper motion to adjourn or postpone the Jacor
stockholders' meeting to another time and/or place for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies in favor of the Jacor merger proposal, the proxy holders will
vote upon the motion as determined in the proxy holder's discretion. If Jacor
stockholders postpone or adjourn
31
<PAGE> 38
the Jacor stockholders' meeting for any reason, at any subsequent reconvening of
the Jacor stockholders' meeting, the proxy holders will vote all shares
represented by a proxy, in the same manner as they would have been voted at the
initial convening of the Jacor stockholders' meeting, even if they were voted on
the same or any other matter at a previous meeting. However, the proxy holders
will not vote those shares represented by a proxy which was revoked or withdrawn
before the reconvened meeting.
IN CONNECTION WITH THE JACOR STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING, HOLDERS OF JACOR COMMON
STOCK SHOULD NOT RETURN TO JACOR ANY STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH THEIR PROXY CARDS.
WE WILL INFORM YOU WHEN AND HOW TO RETURN YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATE AFTER THE
MERGER.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
Clear Channel and Jacor will each bear the cost of proxy solicitation for
their stockholders' meeting, including the reasonable expenses of brokers,
fiduciaries and other nominees in forwarding solicitation material to beneficial
owners. In addition to solicitation by mail, directors, officers and employees
of Clear Channel and Jacor may solicit proxies personally or by telephone,
facsimile transmission or otherwise. Clear Channel and Jacor will not pay
additional compensation to these directors, officers and employees for their
solicitation but may reimburse them for out-of-pocket expenses. We expect to
incur nominal expenses, if any, to engage in such solicitation. Jacor has
retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc., at an estimated cost of approximately $6,000,
plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in solicitation of
proxies. We will make arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees, fiduciaries and stockholders of record to forward proxy solicitation
materials to the beneficial owners of the stock held of record by such persons.
We may reimburse these solicitors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
SHARE OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
Clear Channel. At the close of business on February 22, 1999, directors and
executive officers of Clear Channel and their affiliates beneficially owned an
aggregate of approximately 53,028,876 shares or approximately 20% of the Clear
Channel common stock then outstanding, including 5,241,498 shares issuable
pursuant to options or other derivatives for Clear Channel common stock. See
"Beneficial Ownership of Clear Channel Common Stock" and "The
Merger -- Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger." In conjunction with the
execution of the merger agreement, L. Lowry Mays, Mark P. Mays, Randall T. Mays,
and certain family trusts for which they act as trustees, entered into a voting
agreement with Jacor to vote all shares of Clear Channel common stock under
their voting control in favor of the issuance of Clear Channel common stock in
the merger. See "The Merger -- Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger -- Voting Agreements" and "Beneficial Ownership of Clear Channel Common
Stock."
Jacor. At the close of business on February 22, 1999, directors and
executive officers of Jacor and their affiliates beneficially owned an aggregate
of approximately 14,260,583 shares or approximately 27.7% of the Jacor common
stock then outstanding, excluding 2,231,671 shares issuable pursuant to
warrants, vested options, stock appreciation rights and other rights currently
exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 1999, including 238,269 shares held
under the Jacor Communications, Inc. Retirement Plan, and excluding an aggregate
of 37,966 currently vested stock units granted to non-employee directors and
certain executive officers. See "Beneficial Ownership of Jacor Common Stock" and
"The
32
<PAGE> 39
Merger -- Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger." In conjunction with the
execution of the merger agreement, Samuel Zell, Zell/Chilmark Fund L.P.,
Samstock, L.L.C., and SZ2 (IGP) Partnership, the holders of approximately 26.8%
of the outstanding Jacor common stock as of the Jacor record date, each entered
into a voting agreement with Clear Channel. Pursuant to the voting agreements,
each of these Jacor stockholders agreed to vote all shares of Jacor common stock
under their voting control in favor of approving the merger and approving and
adopting the merger agreement. See "The Merger -- Interests of Certain Persons
in the Merger -- Voting Agreements" and "Beneficial Ownership of Jacor Common
Stock."
THE MERGER
The information in this document summarizes all material terms of the
merger agreement. We urge you to read the merger agreement which is the legal
document that governs the merger and which is attached hereto as Annex A and
incorporated by reference into this document.
STRUCTURE OF THE MERGER
At the time the merger becomes effective, Jacor will merge with and into a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Clear Channel and will cease to exist as a separate
corporation. Clear Channel's merger subsidiary and Jacor are both incorporated
in Delaware. Clear Channel's merger subsidiary will be the surviving corporation
and will succeed to all of Jacor's rights and obligations in accordance with
Delaware law.
MERGER CONSIDERATION
We will convert each share of Jacor common stock outstanding immediately
before the effective time of the merger into Clear Channel common stock at an
exchange ratio determined by the average closing price of Clear Channel common
stock as reported on the NYSE during the 25 consecutive trading days ending two
trading days before the completion of the merger. The exchange ratio is not a
fixed number. We will calculate the exchange ratio as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
If the Clear Channel average Then each share of Jacor common stock
closing price is: will convert into the following number of
shares of Clear Channel common stock:
Less than or equal to $42.86........... 1.40
Above $42.86 but less than or equal to
$44.44................................. 1.40 to 1.35, as determined by dividing
$60.00 by the Clear Channel average
closing price
</TABLE>
Example: Assume the average closing price of Clear Channel
common stock is $44.00. You can calculate the exchange ratio by
dividing $60.00 by $44.00, which equals approximately 1.364
shares of Clear Channel common stock for each share of Jacor
common stock.
33
<PAGE> 40
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Above $44.44 but
less than $50.00............... 1.35
$50.00 or above................ Less than 1.35, as determined by dividing (A)
the sum of (x) $67.50, plus (y) the product
obtained by multiplying $.675 times the amount
by which the Clear Channel average closing price
exceeds $50.00, by (B) the Clear Channel average
closing price.
</TABLE>
Example: Assume the average closing price of Clear Channel
common stock is $55.00. You can calculate the exchange ratio by
dividing (A) the sum of (x) $67.50, plus (y) $3.38 (which equals
$.675 multiplied by $5.00, which is the excess of the average
closing price of Clear Channel common stock over $50.00), or
$70.88, by (B) $55.00, which equals approximately 1.289 shares
of Clear Channel common stock for each share of Jacor common
stock.
If you would like up-to-date information on what the exchange ratio would
be as of a date prior to the special stockholders' meetings, you may call
Jacor's proxy solicitor, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., at (800) 322-2885.
NO FRACTIONAL SHARES
Clear Channel will not issue fractional shares of Clear Channel common
stock to Jacor stockholders. Instead, for each fractional share, Clear Channel
will pay an amount of cash determined by the closing price of Clear Channel
common stock reported on the NYSE on the last trading day before the completion
of the merger. For more information regarding the conversion of Jacor common
stock, see "Terms of the Merger Agreement -- Conversion of Shares in the
Merger."
Example: Assume both the average closing price of Clear Channel
common stock and the fractional share price are $45.00. If a
Jacor stockholder owns 10 shares of Jacor common stock, then the
exchange ratio is 1.35 shares of Clear Channel common stock.
Accordingly, this Jacor stockholder will receive 13 shares of
Clear Channel common stock and a check for the value of 0.5
fractional share, which will be $22.50 (0.5 fractional share
multiplied by $45.00).
EFFECTIVE TIME OF THE MERGER
The merger will become effective when we file the certificate of merger
with the Delaware Secretary of State. We will file the certificate of merger as
soon as practicable after all conditions in the merger agreement are waived or
satisfied. For more information regarding these conditions, see "Terms of the
Merger Agreement -- Conditions to the Merger."
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER
The United States radio broadcasting industry has experienced major changes
over the last five years. In 1992, the FCC began to liberalize historical limits
on the number of
34
<PAGE> 41
radio stations that one company could own in a single market and nationwide. The
Telecommunications Act of 1996 eliminated entirely the aggregate nationwide
limit and increased the number of radio stations that could be owned in a single
market to a maximum of eight depending on the size of the market. Coupled with
favorable economic conditions that increased available capital, the new
regulatory environment encouraged widespread consolidation throughout the radio
industry. Many radio companies began to grow through acquisitions in pursuit of
potential opportunities and synergies that could be achieved by operation of
additional stations at the local and national level. Both Clear Channel and
Jacor embraced this philosophy and, along with a handful of other companies,
have successfully completed numerous acquisitions and have become large radio
companies with nationwide operations.
Jacor first began to implement its acquisition strategy in 1993 following
the capital infusion of $72 million by Zell/Chilmark Fund L.P. in connection
with Jacor's financial restructuring. As a result of that restructuring,
Zell/Chilmark became Jacor's largest stockholder and acquired significant
representation on the Jacor board. The Jacor board appointed Randy Michaels as
Jacor's chief executive officer and Robert Lawrence as Jacor's president to
increase the value of Jacor for the benefit of all of its stockholders. In
addition, Zell/Chilmark's substantial ownership and the financial advice
provided to Jacor by Zell/Chilmark and its affiliate, Equity Group Investments,
greatly facilitated Jacor's access to the financing necessary to fuel Jacor's
growth.
Consistent with prevailing views within the radio industry, Jacor's
management and the Jacor board believed that successful radio companies needed
to be significantly larger to compete effectively and to increase stockholder
value. Between late 1993 and October 7, 1998, Jacor expanded from 13 radio
stations in six markets to 230 radio stations and one television station in 55
markets. Jacor also became the third largest provider in the nation of
syndicated radio programming. The market price for a share of Jacor common stock
increased from approximately $12.00 per share to its then all-time high of
$65.25 in July 1998.
Over the past several years, Jacor's management and/or Zell/Chilmark
periodically received unsolicited contacts from other radio companies expressing
an interest in engaging in a strategic business combination with Jacor or in
acquiring Jacor. Although discussions with interested parties occurred from time
to time, Jacor never sought or received any definitive proposals. Jacor's growth
strategy remained focused on acquisitions to enhance stockholder value.
Beginning in the fall of 1997, Company A, one of the radio companies that
had periodically expressed interest in pursuing a strategic business combination
with Jacor, increased the frequency and seriousness of its overtures. Jacor's
management and Zell/ Chilmark had discussions with Company A at various times
thereafter, but never reached agreement on the structure and terms of any
possible transaction. Other radio companies continued to inform Jacor's
management and Zell/Chilmark that they would be interested in seriously
exploring a transaction with Jacor when and if the Jacor board determined that
the time was right for such a transaction. It was also publicly known that
Zell/Chilmark would terminate in July 2000 by the terms of its partnership
agreement, subject to extension in certain circumstances, and that Zell/Chilmark
would need to sell or distribute its shares of Jacor common stock.
35
<PAGE> 42
In light of these ongoing developments, Jacor requested Donaldson, Lufkin &
Jenrette Securities Corporation, Jacor's primary investment banker since 1993,
to assist Jacor in responding to future expressions of interest from third
parties. On June 18, 1998, Mr. Lawrence, Jacor's President and a director, R.
Christopher Weber, Jacor's Chief Financial Officer, Paul F. Solomon, Jacor's
General Counsel, Rod Dammeyer and Sheli Rosenberg, each a Jacor director and
Zell/Chilmark affiliate, David Rosen and Nils Larsen of Equity Group
Investments, representatives of DLJ and outside legal counsel for Jacor and
Zell/Chilmark met. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss (1) whether it was
the appropriate time to undertake serious consideration of any proposals that
might be received for a business combination involving Jacor, and (2) how to
make any process for considering such transactions as minimally disruptive to
Jacor's ongoing business as possible, particularly if no transaction would
occur.
Representatives of DLJ advised that market conditions were likely optimal
for obtaining the best possible transaction if Jacor were to engage in a
business combination. They further advised that the parties most capable of
successfully consummating such a transaction, strategically and financially,
were three large radio companies, including Clear Channel and Company A. Jacor's
antitrust and FCC counsel discussed the likely regulatory issues that would be
raised by entering into a transaction with any of these three radio companies.
Counsel concluded that although varying degrees of complexity existed,
regulatory concerns would not necessarily preclude a transaction with any of
those entities.
Jacor's management and the Jacor directors present at the meeting agreed
that it would be appropriate to begin the internal process of analyzing Jacor's
value if a potential transaction would arise. In light of industry
consolidation, the likelihood of a high level of interest by potential
interested parties and general market conditions, they agreed it was appropriate
for the Jacor board to be better prepared to consider any future proposals. They
also agreed that no decision had been made to seek out a transaction.
Following the June 18, 1998 meeting, Jacor's management and its advisors
engaged in various analyses and examinations relating to Jacor's possible value,
either as a stand-alone entity or in conjunction with a combination with a third
party. Consistent with prior practice, Mr. Weber and Mr. Larsen also informally
updated members of the Jacor board of these developments.
In July 1998, Messrs. Michaels, Lawrence and Weber met with L. Lowry Mays,
Clear Channel's Chief Executive Officer, and Mark Mays, Clear Channel's
President and Chief Operating Officer, to discuss the potential fit between
Jacor and Clear Channel. Clear Channel was interested in a possible transaction
with Jacor because it believed the combined company would have greater operating
strengths and financial resources that would allow Clear Channel to better
compete with other national media companies. Clear Channel also was interested
in the possible new opportunities that could arise from Jacor's substantial
radio operations and Clear Channel's complementary television and outdoor
advertising media. Therefore, as Clear Channel's management had informally
informed Jacor's management from time to time, Clear Channel was prepared to
fully explore a transaction with Jacor if the opportunity arose.
Also in July 1998, Mr. Michaels met separately with Mr. Lowry Mays and with
the chief executive officers of Company A and of the other most likely
interested party, Company B, to preliminarily discuss the possible management
structure that could result
36
<PAGE> 43
from a business combination involving Jacor and that party. No specific
discussions regarding any proposal took place with any of Clear Channel, Company
A or Company B.
On August 11, 1998, Messrs. Michaels, Dammeyer and Larsen had a telephone
conversation to develop Jacor's specific strategy for responding to any
proposals for a possible business combination. Mr. Michaels subsequently
contacted Mr. Lowry Mays, Company A and Company B on August 11 and 12, 1998. He
informed each of them that Jacor might now consider proposals and that Jacor
believed that several companies would be interested in exploring possibilities.
He told them that, if they were interested, Jacor's management team was willing
to meet with them and that due diligence materials had been assembled for their
review. Mr. Michaels stressed that, although Jacor was willing to seriously
consider alternatives at this time, Jacor was not "for sale" and might not enter
into a transaction with any of the interested parties.
Each of the three potential interested parties said they wanted to be
involved in this process. They each executed a confidentiality agreement with
Jacor and scheduled a time to meet with Jacor's management and to examine the
available due diligence materials. Representatives of DLJ informed the potential
interested parties that any proposals should be made no later than September 11,
1998.
On August 26, 1998, the Jacor board met at a regularly scheduled meeting
and was updated on the status of the process undertaken through that date. The
Jacor board affirmed the appropriateness of the process and that viable
strategic alternatives to remaining an independent public company should be
fully considered. Jacor's management and representatives of Equity Group
Investments agreed to keep the directors apprised of ongoing developments.
On August 26, 1998, representatives of Company B met with representatives
of DLJ. On August 27, 1998, representatives of Company B met with Messrs.
Michaels, Lawrence, Weber and Larsen and conducted due diligence. On August 31,
1998, Messrs. Mark Mays and Randall Mays and representatives of Salomon Smith
Barney, Clear Channel's financial advisor, met with the same Jacor team and
conducted due diligence. Company A subsequently declined to meet and to conduct
due diligence, but informed Jacor that it had enough information on which it
could make a proposal.
During the week prior to September 11, 1998, the chief executive officer of
Company A called Mr. Michaels. He said that economic conditions would preclude
Company A from making a proposal for a business combination with Jacor but that
Company A remained interested in such a transaction. On September 11, 1998,
Clear Channel submitted a proposal for Jacor to merge with Clear Channel in a
stock-for-stock exchange. Company B informed representatives of DLJ that they
were interested in submitting a proposal but would not do so until the following
week. Subsequently, Company B declined to submit a proposal citing concerns over
the availability of the necessary capital. In addition, Company A's chief
executive officer called Mr. Michaels on several occasions to suggest that Jacor
not pursue any possible transaction at that time. He did not make any proposal
on behalf of Company A. Mr. Michaels encouraged him to make a proposal, but did
not inform him about the status of proposals from Clear Channel or any other
party.
At the outset of the process, Jacor and its financial advisors agreed to
contact only Clear Channel, Company A and Company B. Those three entities were
considered the
37
<PAGE> 44
most likely parties to propose a transaction that would produce greater value to
Jacor's stockholders than could be achieved by continuing to operate Jacor as an
independent entity. Such a targeted process is designed to obtain the most
favorable result for Jacor's stockholders without the disruption to business
operations that accompanies a wide-scale auction. Company A and Company B both
informed Jacor that economic conditions and uncertainty over available capital
precluded them from making a definitive proposal. Based on these responses from
two of the three most likely merger candidates, Jacor believed that it was
unlikely that any potentially interested entity other than Clear Channel would
have the requisite interest and be able to obtain the capital necessary to make
a compelling proposal at that time. Accordingly, Jacor determined not to seek
any other proposals. However, before Jacor could conclude its assessment of
possible strategic alternatives, Jacor needed to further explore Clear Channel's
proposal to determine whether it was a compelling proposal.
Therefore, Samuel Zell, Jacor's chairman of the board, Mr. Dammeyer and
Messrs. Lowry Mays, Mark Mays and Randall Mays had a series of telephonic
discussions and one in-person meeting on September 29, 1998. They discussed the
material terms of Clear Channel's proposal in greater detail. They did not reach
a definitive agreement, but the parties agreed that Clear Channel's legal
counsel should prepare a draft merger agreement. Clear Channel distributed the
first draft to Jacor's working group on October 2, 1998. Also on October 2,
Messrs. Michaels, Weber and Larsen met with Messrs. Mark Mays and Randall Mays.
Both Jacor and Clear Channel conducted additional due diligence on each other
and discussed ways in which Clear Channel and Jacor could both benefit from a
possible merger from an ongoing operational viewpoint. Representatives of DLJ
and Salomon Smith Barney also participated in that meeting.
From October 2 through October 4, the Jacor working group analyzed the
proposed terms and conditions of the merger and developed Jacor's responses to
Clear Channel on various points of contention and clarification through a series
of telephonic conference calls. On the evening of October 3, counsel for Clear
Channel and Jacor discussed major issues by telephone and agreed that the
respective working groups would meet beginning on October 5 to negotiate the
terms of a definitive agreement. On the evening of October 4, Jacor's counsel
delivered to the Clear Channel working group a detailed mark-up of the proposed
merger agreement reflecting all of Jacor's comments.
The Jacor and Clear Channel working groups commenced face-to-face
negotiations on October 5, 1998. Messrs. Weber and Larsen continued to
informally update the Jacor directors who were not directly involved in the
process of new developments and significant issues that needed to be resolved.
Negotiations continued through October 8, 1998. Concurrently, the parties
continued their respective due diligence reviews. The Zell Stockholders and
their legal counsel also negotiated the terms of the Zell Stockholders' voting
agreements and registration rights agreement. The terms of the Mays voting
agreements were also negotiated and agreed upon.
During these negotiations, the Jacor board met by telephone on the
afternoon of October 6, 1998 to discuss the current status of the proposed
merger with Clear Channel. Messrs. Weber, Solomon and Larsen, and Jacor's legal
counsel and representatives of DLJ also participated in this meeting. The terms
and structure of the transaction were discussed extensively. Representatives of
DLJ also provided the Jacor board with an overview of the analysis that it had
undertaken and indicated that it was likely to conclude that the exchange ratio
was fair to Jacor's stockholders from a financial point of view.
38
<PAGE> 45
Substantial progress in the negotiations between Clear Channel and Jacor
continued after the October 6 telephonic Jacor board meeting. Both Jacor and
Clear Channel scheduled meetings of their respective boards of directors for
October 7, 1998.
The Jacor board met on the afternoon of October 7, 1998 to consider the
terms of the proposed merger with Clear Channel. Messrs. Weber, Solomon and
Larsen, and Jacor's legal counsel and representatives of DLJ also participated
in this meeting. Jacor's legal counsel summarized the terms and conditions of
the merger agreement and led a discussion on those terms. Representatives of DLJ
reviewed the process undertaken by Jacor and the financial analysis of the
stock-for-stock merger and orally opined that the exchange ratio was fair to
Jacor's stockholders from a financial point of view. After discussion, the Jacor
board resolved that the merger was advisable and in the best interest of the
Jacor stockholders and unanimously approved the merger and the merger agreement.
The Clear Channel board met on the morning of October 7, 1998 to consider
the terms of the proposed merger with Jacor. Representatives of Salomon Smith
Barney Inc. reviewed the process undertaken by Clear Channel and the financial
analysis of the stock-for-stock merger and orally opined that the exchange ratio
was fair to Clear Channel from a financial point of view. After discussion, the
Clear Channel board then unanimously approved the merger and the merger
agreement.
Following those meetings, the parties negotiated the final changes to the
merger agreement. Clear Channel and Jacor executed the merger agreement early in
the morning on October 8, 1998. Clear Channel and Jacor then issued a joint
press release before the opening of the financial markets on October 8, 1998
announcing that they had entered into the merger agreement.
CLEAR CHANNEL REASONS FOR THE MERGER; RECOMMENDATION OF THE
CLEAR CHANNEL BOARD
The Clear Channel board believes that the terms of the merger are fair to
and in the best interest of Clear Channel and its stockholders. Accordingly, the
Clear Channel board has unanimously approved the merger agreement. In reaching
its determination, the Clear Channel board consulted with Clear Channel's
management, as well as its financial and legal advisors, and considered the
following material factors:
- the merger appears to provide significant enhanced benefits to Clear
Channel and its stockholders;
- the merger will solidify Clear Channel's position as a leading domestic
radio broadcaster, and by doing so, will augment Clear Channel's
credibility with various vendors and suppliers;
- the combined company will have greater competitive strengths and
financial resources to better compete with other national diversified
media companies, and will have new opportunities for further expansion;
- the combined company will have a more complete national presence owing to
the greater number of markets it will be able to market to its clients,
which should enhance its ability to compete with other national
diversified media companies;
39
<PAGE> 46
- the combined company will have a greater market capitalization than
either of the companies do on a stand-alone basis, which the Clear
Channel board believes will give it access to a more diverse shareholder
base, enhancing its ability to raise capital which may be necessary to
fund future growth;
- the combined company diversifies revenue and after-tax cash flow across a
larger number of geographic markets, thereby reducing reliance on any
individual market;
- the combined company will give Clear Channel an operating presence in a
number of domestic markets in which it does not now operate;
- the combined company will have increased management strength;
- the companies have very complementary corporate cultures, and the
combination of the two will facilitate the sharing of best practices
across the organization and allow the adoption of the most attractive
aspects of each independent company by the other;
- the complementary nature of the combined company's operations in radio,
television and outdoor advertising media;
- the merger provides opportunities for economies of scale and other
efficiencies through the increased presence of radio stations of Clear
Channel and Jacor; and
- the oral opinion of Salomon Smith Barney Inc. provided on October 7, 1998
and subsequently confirmed in writing on October 8, 1998 that, based upon
and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the
exchange ratio is fair to Clear Channel from a financial point of view.
In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the merger, the Clear Channel board did not find it practical, and
did not, quantify or otherwise attempt to assign relative weights to the
specific factors considered in reaching its determination. The Clear Channel
board relied on the experience and expertise of Salomon Smith Barney Inc., its
financial advisor, for quantitative analysis of the financial terms of the
merger.
THE CLEAR CHANNEL BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT CLEAR CHANNEL
STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE CLEAR CHANNEL MERGER PROPOSAL AT THE CLEAR
CHANNEL STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING.
JACOR REASONS FOR THE MERGER; RECOMMENDATION OF THE JACOR BOARD
The Jacor board believes that the terms of the merger are advisable and in
the best interests of Jacor and its stockholders. In reaching its determination
to approve the merger agreement and to recommend the merger to Jacor's
stockholders, the Jacor board consulted with Jacor's management and with Jacor's
financial and legal advisor. Together, they considered the following material
factors:
- the value of Clear Channel stock being offered to Jacor's stockholders
represented a significant premium over recent market prices of Jacor
stock. For example, as of October 6, 1998, one share of Jacor common
stock had a market value of $41.66. Under the terms of Clear Channel's
proposal, that share would have been exchanged for 1.4 shares of Clear
Channel common stock having a market value of $57.32, a premium of 37.6%;
40
<PAGE> 47
- the Jacor board's belief that Clear Channel was an attractive and strong
merger partner based on its record of strong financial performance over
the previous five years, particularly its 74% compound annual growth rate
in after tax cash flow;
- the Jacor board's belief that Clear Channel stock was an attractive form
of consideration as evidenced by the fact that the per share market price
for Clear Channel common stock had risen from approximately $3.00 to a
high of $61.75 between October 1993 and October 1998, providing investors
with a 65% compound annual growth rate;
- the opportunity for Jacor stockholders to continue to participate in the
equity of the business, including to benefit from any future increases in
the value of Clear Channel common stock received in the merger;
- the Jacor board's belief that the Jacor and Clear Channel management
teams will be able to work together effectively, and the favorable
business reputation of Clear Channel's management and major stockholders;
- Clear Channel's ability to complete the merger in a timely manner,
including the possibility that the merger might be able to close
substantially earlier than the October 8, 1999 drop dead date due to the
presence of a relatively small number of potential antitrust and FCC
obstacles;
- the structure of the merger which allows for the continued participation
of Jacor's management team in the business of the combined company after
the merger, thereby providing Jacor's stockholders with an ongoing
opportunity to indirectly benefit from management's expertise in
implementing Jacor's operating strategies through potential increases in
the market price of Clear Channel common stock;
- the Jacor board's belief that the combination of Jacor's radio stations
and syndicated radio programming with Clear Channel's radio and
television stations and outdoor advertising facilities will result in a
significant asset mix, revenue diversity, potential synergies and the
opportunity for cross selling and cross marketing advertising media,
thereby providing additional value;
- the Jacor board's belief that the merger represents the best strategic
alternative available to Jacor and its stockholders under present
circumstances, including the prospects for ongoing consolidation in the
radio industry;
- the increased financial strength that the companies would obtain by
combining Jacor with Clear Channel, providing Jacor and its stockholders
with greater revenues, greater financial leverage and enhanced prospects
for the future;
- the oral and written opinion of DLJ provided on October 7, 1998 that,
based on its review and analysis and subject to the limitations set forth
therein, the exchange ratio is fair to Jacor's stockholders from a
financial point of view;
- the terms of the merger agreement (including the floating exchange ratio
and the right to terminate the agreement if the average closing price of
Clear Channel common stock over a consecutive 25 day trading period is
below $37.50), the voting agreements and the registration rights
agreement;
- Jacor's ability under the merger agreement to consider and accept
superior proposals subject to the payment of a $115 million termination
fee to Clear Channel under certain conditions, which fee the Jacor board
believes is within the range of reasonableness for a transaction the size
of the merger;
41
<PAGE> 48
- the fact that the merger agreement provides for equal treatment of all
Jacor stockholders, including Zell/Chilmark; and
- the tax-free nature of the stock-for-stock merger to Jacor's
stockholders.
In view of the wide variety of factors considered, the Jacor board did not
assign relative weights to the factors discussed above or determine that any
factor was of particular importance. Rather, the Jacor board viewed its
positions and recommendation as being based upon the totality of the information
presented. The Jacor board relied on the experience and expertise of DLJ, its
financial advisor, for quantitative analysis of the financial terms of the
merger.
The Jacor board did not assign relative weights to the results of the
various analyses prepared by DLJ nor did it determine that any single analysis
was of particular importance. The Jacor board recognized that the percentage of
equity ownership to be owned by Jacor stockholders was lower than the percentage
of Jacor's contributions in a few categories. The Jacor board believed that such
contributions would be partially offset by the Jacor indebtedness to be assumed
by Clear Channel and by Jacor's lower operating margins compared to Clear
Channel's historical operating margins. The Jacor board determined not to place
undue emphasis on the few specific calculations in the relative contribution
analysis and considered the results of all the analyses presented by DLJ taken
as a whole.
In considering all of the factors described above, individual members of
the Jacor board may have given different weight to different factors. The Jacor
board considered all these factors as a whole, and considered the factors in
their totality to be favorable to and to support its determination to approve
the merger and recommend it to Jacor's stockholders.
THE JACOR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT JACOR STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN
FAVOR OF THE JACOR MERGER PROPOSAL AT THE JACOR STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING.
OPINIONS OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO THE CLEAR CHANNEL BOARD
Salomon Smith Barney Inc. has acted as the financial advisor to Clear
Channel in connection with the merger. On October 7, 1998, Salomon stated to the
Clear Channel board its oral opinion that, as of such date and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in the presentation, the
exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to Clear Channel. Such
opinion was confirmed in writing on October 8, 1998.
The opinion and presentation of Salomon to the Clear Channel board, in
connection with which Salomon was requested to evaluate, among other things, the
fairness from a financial point of view of the exchange ratio to Clear Channel,
was only one of many factors taken into consideration by the Clear Channel board
in making its determination to approve the merger agreement. The terms of the
merger were determined through
42
<PAGE> 49
negotiations between Clear Channel and Jacor and were approved by the Clear
Channel board.
THE FULL TEXT OF SALOMON'S OPINION, WHICH SETS FORTH THE ASSUMPTIONS MADE,
GENERAL PROCEDURES FOLLOWED, MATTERS CONSIDERED AND LIMITATIONS ON THE REVIEW
UNDERTAKEN BY SALOMON, IS ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT AS ANNEX E. SALOMON HAS
CONSENTED TO THE INCLUSION OF ITS OPINION AND TO THE INCLUSION OF THE SUMMARY
THEREOF IN THIS DOCUMENT. IN GIVING SUCH CONSENT, SALOMON DOES NOT CONCEDE THAT
IT COMES WITHIN THE CATEGORY OF PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION
7 OF THE SECURITIES ACT, OR THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE SEC THEREUNDER, NOR
DOES IT THEREBY CONCEDE THAT IT IS AN EXPERT WITH RESPECT TO ANY PART OF THE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT OF WHICH THIS DOCUMENT IS A PART WITHIN THE MEANING OF
THE TERM "EXPERTS" AS USED IN THE SECURITIES ACT OR THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF
THE SEC THEREUNDER. SALOMON'S OPINION SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY AND IN ITS
ENTIRETY. IT IS DIRECTED ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS, FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW,
OF THE EXCHANGE RATIO TO CLEAR CHANNEL AND DOES NOT ADDRESS CLEAR CHANNEL'S
UNDERLYING BUSINESS DECISION TO EFFECT THE MERGER OR CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION
TO ANY CLEAR CHANNEL STOCKHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH HOLDER SHOULD VOTE WITH RESPECT
TO THE MERGER. IT ALSO DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OPINION OR IMPLY ANY CONCLUSION OF
SALOMON AS TO THE LIKELY TRADING RANGE FOR THE CLEAR CHANNEL COMMON STOCK OR THE
JACOR COMMON STOCK FOLLOWING THE ANNOUNCEMENT OR CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER,
WHICH MAY VARY DEPENDING UPON VARIOUS FACTORS DISCUSSED IN THE OPINION. THE
SUMMARY OF SALOMON'S OPINION SET FORTH IN THIS DOCUMENT IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FULL TEXT OF THE OPINION.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Salomon, among other things:
- reviewed the October 8, 1998 draft of the merger agreement, including the
exhibits thereto and certain documents referred to therein, in the form
provided to Salomon, and assumed that the final form of such agreement
would not vary in any respect that is material to Salomon's analysis;
- reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information
that Salomon deemed relevant relating to Clear Channel and Jacor and the
industries in which they operate;
- reviewed certain internal non-public financial and operating data and
other information provided to Salomon by the managements of Clear Channel
and Jacor relating to Clear Channel's and Jacor's businesses, including
certain forecast and projection information as to the future financial
results of such businesses;
- reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information
with respect to certain other companies that Salomon believed to be
relevant or comparable in certain respects to Clear Channel and Jacor,
and the trading markets for such other companies' securities;
- reviewed and analyzed certain publicly available and other information
concerning the trading of, and the trading market for, the Clear Channel
common stock and the Jacor common stock;
- reviewed the financial terms of certain business combinations and
acquisition transactions that Salomon deemed to be reasonably comparable
to the merger and otherwise relevant to Salomon's inquiry;
- discussed with members of Clear Channel's and Jacor's senior managements
and other officers and employees of Clear Channel and Jacor the
foregoing, including
43
<PAGE> 50
the past and current business operations, financial condition and
prospects of Clear Channel and Jacor, respectively, before and after
giving effect to the merger; and
- considered such other information, financial studies, analyses,
investigations and financial, economic, market and trading criteria as
Salomon deemed relevant to its inquiry.
In its review and analysis and in arriving at its opinion, Salomon assumed
and relied upon, without assuming any responsibility for verification, the
accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information provided
to, discussed with, or reviewed by or for Salomon, or publicly available. With
respect to Clear Channel's and Jacor's financial projections, Salomon assumed
that they had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments on the part of the management of Clear Channel
or Jacor, as the case may be, as to the future financial performance of Clear
Channel or Jacor, as the case may be. Salomon expressed no view as to such
projections or information or the assumptions on which they are based. Salomon
did not assume any responsibility for making or obtaining any independent
evaluations or appraisals of any of the assets or liabilities of Clear Channel
or Jacor, nor for conducting a physical inspection of the properties and
facilities of Clear Channel or Jacor. The Salomon opinion was necessarily based
upon market, economic and other conditions as they existed and could be
evaluated on October 8, 1998, and Salomon assumed no responsibility to update or
revise their opinion based upon circumstances or events occurring after October
8, 1998.
For purposes of rendering its opinion, Salomon assumed, in all respects
material to its analysis, that the representations and warranties of each party
contained in the merger agreement were true and correct, that each party would
perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under
the merger agreement, and that all conditions to the consummation of the merger
would be satisfied without waiver thereof. Salomon also assumed that all
material governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals would be
obtained and that in the course of obtaining any necessary governmental,
regulatory or other consents and approvals, or any amendments, modifications or
waivers to any documents to which either Clear Channel or Jacor is a party, as
contemplated by the merger agreement, no restrictions would be imposed, or
amendments, modifications or waivers made that would have any material adverse
effect on the contemplated benefits of the merger. Salomon assumed the merger
would qualify as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In connection with rendering its opinion to the Clear Channel board,
Salomon performed certain financial analyses which it presented to the Clear
Channel board, the material portions of which are summarized below. In addition,
Salomon believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that
selecting portions of such analyses and the factors considered therein, without
considering all such analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of
the analyses and the process underlying its opinion. While the conclusions
reached in connection with each analysis were considered carefully by Salomon in
arriving at its opinion, Salomon made various subjective judgments in arriving
at its opinion and did not consider it practicable to, nor did it attempt to,
assign relative weights to the individual analyses and specific factors
considered in reaching its opinion.
44
<PAGE> 51
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not
necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In addition,
the process of preparing a fairness opinion necessarily requires a broad range
of subjective judgments with respect to appropriate comparable companies and
transactions, appropriate multiples of various selected financial data,
appropriate discount rates and other financial and other factors. Analyses and
estimates of the values of companies do not purport to be appraisals or
necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or their securities actually
may be sold. No public company utilized as a comparison is identical to Clear
Channel or Jacor, and none of the other business combinations utilized as a
comparison is identical to the proposed merger. Accordingly, any analysis of
publicly traded comparable companies or comparable business combinations is not
mathematical; rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the
companies involved and other factors that could affect the public trading value
of the companies or company to which they are being compared. The range of
valuation for any particular analysis should not be taken to be the view of
Salomon of the actual value of Clear Channel or Jacor.
The projections furnished to Salomon and used in formulating Salomon's
opinion were provided to Salomon, in connection with the review of the merger,
by the management of each of Clear Channel and Jacor. The projections were based
on numerous variables and assumptions which are inherently uncertain, including,
without limitation, factors related to general economic and competitive
conditions. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those set
forth in such projection.
THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE MATERIAL FINANCIAL ANALYSES USED BY
SALOMON IN CONNECTION WITH PROVIDING ITS OPINION TO THE CLEAR CHANNEL BOARD. THE
SUMMARIES OF FINANCIAL ANALYSES INCLUDE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN TABULAR FORMAT.
IN ORDER TO FULLY UNDERSTAND THE FINANCIAL ANALYSES USED BY SALOMON, THE TABLES
MUST BE READ WITH THE TEXT OF EACH SUMMARY. THE TABLES ALONE DO NOT CONSTITUTE A
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE FINANCIAL ANALYSES. When calculating firm value and
equity value for Jacor, Salomon assumed total debt of $1.4 billion, excluding
LYONs, cash and investments of $58 million, option proceeds of $247 million,
assuming the exercise of all outstanding options, and fully-diluted shares of
66.3 million, including LYONs.
45
<PAGE> 52
Historical Exchange Ratio Analysis. Salomon reviewed the ratio of the
closing prices of Jacor common stock over Clear Channel common stock at their
current market prices as of October 7, 1998, over the intervals of three months,
six months and one year prior to the announcement of the merger and the period
January 1, 1997 through October 7, 1998. The review indicated that the current
market prices of the Clear Channel common stock and Jacor common stock as of
October 7, 1998 corresponds to an exchange ratio of 1.08x and averaged 1.11x
over the three months, 1.13x over the six months, and 1.21x over the one year
prior to the announcement of the merger and averaged 1.26x for the period
January 1, 1997 through October 7, 1998. Salomon provided the foregoing
information to the Clear Channel board to assist in comparing the historical
exchange ratios described above to the exchange ratios contemplated in the
merger.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IMPLIED
EXCHANGE RATIO
AVERAGE AS OF OCTOBER 7,
PERIOD EXCHANGE RATIO 1998
------ -------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
3 months prior to announcement....................... 1.11x 1.08x
6 months prior to announcement....................... 1.13x
1 year prior to announcement......................... 1.21x
January 1, 1997 to October 7, 1998................... 1.26x
</TABLE>
Comparable Public Company Trading Analysis. Using publicly available
information and Wall Street consensus projections, Salomon compared each of
Clear Channel and Jacor to the following six radio companies: CBS Corporation,
Chancellor Media Corporation, Cox Radio, Inc., Emmis Broadcasting Corporation,
Citadel Communications Corporation and Cumulus Media Inc. based on various
measures of financial performance. Salomon noted that Clear Channel's and
Jacor's firm values as multiples of 1999 estimated broadcast cash flow were
15.3x and 11.7x, respectively, compared with a median of 11.2x for the selected
group. Salomon also noted that Clear Channel's and Jacor's market prices per
share as multiples of 1999 estimated after-tax cash flow were 18.6x and 13.6x,
respectively, compared with a median of 14.2x for the selected group. Salomon
provided the foregoing information to the Clear Channel board for the board's
use in evaluating the valuation of Jacor relative to certain comparable public
companies.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRM VALUES AS
MULTIPLES OF 1999
ESTIMATED BCF
------------------
<S> <C>
Clear Channel........................................ 15.3x
Jacor................................................ 11.7x
Median for Selected Group............................ 11.2x
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARKET PRICES PER
SHARE AS MULTIPLES
OF 1999
ESTIMATED ATCF
------------------
<S> <C>
Clear Channel........................................ 18.6x
Jacor................................................ 13.6x
Median for Selected Group............................ 14.2x
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE> 53
Implied Private Market Valuation of Jacor. Salomon derived an implied
private market valuation for Jacor based on projections from Clear Channel's
management and Wall Street consensus projections of 1999 broadcast cash flow for
Jacor on a stand-alone basis. Salomon reviewed publicly available information
regarding 36 selected merger transactions in the radio industry during 1995,
1996, 1997 and 1998. The median of the transaction values as multiples of
current year broadcast cash flow in the selected transactions was 12.1x in 1995,
12.5x in 1996, 14.0x in 1997 and 15.1x in 1998.
Salomon applied a range of multiples of 14.0x to 16.0x to 1999 estimated
broadcast cash flow of Jacor, resulting in a range of implied per share prices
for Jacor common stock of $55.00 to $66.00 based on projections from Clear
Channel's management and $51.00 to $61.00 based on Wall Street consensus
projections. This corresponds to an implied exchange ratio of 1.49x to 1.78x
based on Clear Channel's management projections and 1.38x to 1.65x based on Wall
Street consensus projections at a current market price for Clear Channel common
stock of $37.00 as of October 7, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IMPLIED PER SHARE IMPLIED EXCHANGE
PRICE RATIO
----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Based on Management Projections..................... $55.00 - $66.00 1.49x - 1.78x
Based on Wall Street Consensus Projections.......... $51.00 - $61.00 1.38x - 1.65x
</TABLE>
Implied Discounted Cash Flow Valuation of Jacor. Using a discounted cash
flow methodology, Salomon calculated a range of firm values of Jacor as of
January 1, 1999 based on (i) the estimated unlevered free cash flows that Jacor
could produce on a stand-alone basis, without giving effect to any operating or
other efficiencies arising from the merger, over the five-year period from
fiscal year end 1999 through fiscal year end 2003 and (ii) a range of 2003
terminal earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
multiples from 12.0x to 14.0x applied to 2003 EBITDA. Salomon discounted these
cash flows by a range of discount rates representing the weighted average cost
of capital from 9.5% to 10.5%, resulting in a range of firm values as of January
1, 1999 from $5,016 million to $5,531 million, using projections provided by
Clear Channel's management. This corresponds to a range of implied per share
equity values from $58.66 to $66.44 and implied exchange ratios based on a
current market price of $37.00 for Clear Channel common stock of 1.59x to 1.78x.
Using the average of the latest available Wall Street consensus projections,
where available, adjusted for Jacor's recently announced acquisitions, Salomon
derived a range of firm values as of January 1, 1999 from $4,741 million and
$5,227 million. This corresponds to a range of implied per share equity values
from $54.50 to $61.84, and implied exchange ratios based on a current market
price of $37.00 for Clear Channel common stock of 1.49x to 1.68x.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IMPLIED PER SHARE IMPLIED EXCHANGE
EQUITY VALUE RATIO
----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Based on Management Projections..................... $58.66 - $66.44 1.59x - 1.78x
Based on Wall Street Consensus Projections.......... $54.50 - $61.84 1.49x - 1.68x
</TABLE>
Pro Forma After-Tax Cash Flow Analysis. Using projections from Clear
Channel's management and Wall Street consensus projections, where available,
adjusted for recently announced Jacor acquisitions, Salomon analyzed the
potential impact of the merger on Clear Channel's 1999 and 2000 after tax cash
flow per share. The analysis excluded the benefits of projected operating
synergies, but reflected the refinancing of Jacor's bank debt and high-yield
bonds. Salomon analyzed the impact of combining the diluted after-tax
47
<PAGE> 54
cash flow of Clear Channel and Jacor, net of the exclusions mentioned above, at
the range of exchange ratios contemplated in the merger of 1.40x, 1.35x and
1.30x.
Salomon's analysis, using projections from Clear Channel's management,
indicated that at the exchange ratio of 1.40x, the merger would result in a 2.9%
per share accretion to Clear Channel's stand-alone 1999 estimated after-tax cash
flow, a 3.9% per share accretion at the exchange ratio of 1.35x and a 4.9% per
share accretion at the exchange ratio of 1.30x. At the exchange ratio of 1.40x,
the merger would result in a 3.5% per share accretion to Clear Channel's
stand-alone 2000 estimated after-tax cash flow, a 4.4% per share accretion at
the exchange ratio of 1.35x and a 5.4% per share accretion at the exchange ratio
of 1.30x.
Salomon's analysis, using Wall Street consensus projections, indicated that
at the exchange ratio of 1.40x, the merger would result in a 1.1% per share
accretion to Clear Channel's stand-alone 1999 estimated after-tax cash flow, a
2.1% per share accretion at the exchange ratio of 1.35x and a 3.1% per share
accretion at the exchange ratio of 1.30x. At the exchange ratio of 1.40x, the
merger would result in a 1.6% per share accretion to Clear Channel's stand-alone
2000 estimated after-tax cash flow, a 2.6% per share accretion at the exchange
ratio of 1.35x and a 3.5% per share accretion at the exchange ratio of 1.30x.
BASED ON MANAGEMENT PROJECTIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 2000
EXCHANGE RATIO % ACCRETION % ACCRETION
- -------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
1.40x 2.9% 3.5%
1.35x 3.9 4.4
1.30x 4.9 5.4
</TABLE>
BASED ON WALL STREET CONSENSUS PROJECTIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 2000
EXCHANGE RATIO % ACCRETION % ACCRETION
-------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
1.40x 1.1% 1.6%
1.35x 2.1 2.6
1.30x 3.1 3.5
</TABLE>
Pro Forma Broadcast Cash Flow Analysis. Using projections from Clear
Channel's management and Wall Street consensus projections, where available,
adjusted for recently announced Jacor acquisitions, Salomon analyzed the
potential impact of the merger on the share price of Clear Channel's common
stock assuming that Clear Channel's broadcast cash flow multiples would stay
constant after the merger. The analysis excluded the benefits of projected
operating synergies, but reflected the refinancing of Jacor's bank debt and
high-yield bonds. Salomon analyzed the impact of combining the broadcast cash
flow of Clear Channel and Jacor, net of the exclusions mentioned above, at the
range of exchange ratios contemplated in the merger of 1.40x, 1.35x and 1.30x.
Salomon's analysis, using projections from Clear Channel's management,
indicated based on 1999 broadcast cash flow estimates, the merger would result
in a 4.2% implied share price accretion to Clear Channel common stock at the
exchange ratio of 1.40x, a 5.2% implied share price accretion to Clear Channel
common stock at the exchange ratio of 1.35x and a 6.2% implied share price
accretion at the exchange ratio of 1.30x. Based on 2000 broadcast cash flow
estimates, the merger would result in a 3.7% implied share price
48
<PAGE> 55
accretion to Clear Channel common stock at the exchange ratio of 1.40x, 4.7%
implied share price accretion to Clear Channel common stock at the exchange
ratio of 1.35x and 5.7% implied share price accretion to Clear Channel common
stock at the exchange ratio of 1.30x.
Salomon's analysis, using Wall Street consensus projections, indicated that
based on 1999 broadcast cash flow estimates, the merger would result in a 2.0%
implied share price accretion to Clear Channel common stock at the exchange
ratio of 1.40x, a 3.0% implied share price accretion to Clear Channel common
stock at the exchange ratio of 1.35x and a 4.0% implied share price accretion at
the exchange ratio of 1.30x. Based on 2000 broadcast cash flow estimates, the
merger would result in a 1.5% implied share price accretion to Clear Channel
common stock at the exchange ratio of 1.40x, 2.5% implied share price accretion
to Clear Channel common stock at the exchange ratio of 1.35x and 3.5% implied
share price accretion to Clear Channel common stock at the exchange ratio of
1.30x.
BASED ON MANAGEMENT PROJECTIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 2000
EXCHANGE RATIO % ACCRETION % ACCRETION
- -------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
1.40x 4.2% 3.7%
1.35x 5.2 4.7
1.30x 6.2 5.7
</TABLE>
BASED ON WALL STREET CONSENSUS PROJECTIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 2000
EXCHANGE RATIO % ACCRETION % ACCRETION
- -------------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
1.40x 2.0% 1.5%
1.35x 3.0 2.5
1.30x 4.0 3.5
</TABLE>
Salomon is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that
regularly engages in the valuation of companies and their securities in
connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive
bids, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, and corporate,
estate and other purposes. Clear Channel retained Salomon as a financial advisor
because of its reputation, expertise in the valuation of companies and
substantial experience in transactions such as the merger.
In the past Salomon has rendered certain investment banking services to
Clear Channel for which it has been paid fees. Pursuant to an engagement letter
dated October 7, 1998, Clear Channel agreed to pay Salomon a fee of $1 million
upon the delivery of its opinion or the execution of the merger agreement and an
additional fee of $2 million upon the closing of the merger. Additionally, Clear
Channel has agreed to reimburse Salomon for reasonable out-of pocket expenses,
including, without limitation, reasonable fees and disbursements of Salomon's
legal counsel and agreed to indemnify Salomon and certain related persons
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities
laws, related to or arising out of its engagement. In the ordinary course of
business, Salomon or its affiliates may actively trade the securities of Clear
Channel and Jacor for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and,
accordingly, at any time may hold a long or short position in such securities.
49
<PAGE> 56
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO THE JACOR BOARD
In its role as financial advisor to Jacor, DLJ was asked by Jacor to render
an opinion to the Jacor board as to the fairness to the Jacor stockholders, from
a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio pursuant to the terms of the
merger agreement. DLJ was not retained as an advisor or agent to Jacor's
stockholders or any other person, other than as an advisor to the Jacor board.
On October 7, 1998, DLJ delivered an oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in
writing as of the same date, to the effect that as of the date of such opinion,
and based upon and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications
set forth in such opinion, the exchange ratio was fair to the Jacor stockholders
from a financial point of view.
THE FULL TEXT OF DLJ'S OPINION IS ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT AS ANNEX F.
JACOR STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ DLJ'S OPINION IN ITS ENTIRETY FOR
ASSUMPTIONS MADE, PROCEDURES FOLLOWED, OTHER MATTERS CONSIDERED AND LIMITS OF
THE REVIEW UNDERTAKEN IN ARRIVING AT SUCH OPINION. DLJ'S OPINION WAS PREPARED
FOR THE JACOR BOARD AND IS DIRECTED ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS OF THE EXCHANGE RATIO
TO THE JACOR STOCKHOLDERS FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW AND DOES NOT ADDRESS
THE MERITS OF THE UNDERLYING DECISION BY JACOR TO ENGAGE IN THE MERGER OR OTHER
BUSINESS STRATEGIES CONSIDERED BY THE JACOR BOARD. DLJ'S OPINION DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY JACOR STOCKHOLDER AS TO HOW SUCH STOCKHOLDER
SHOULD VOTE AT THE JACOR STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING.
DLJ's opinion does not constitute an opinion as to the price at which the
Clear Channel common stock or the Jacor common stock will actually trade at any
time. The exchange ratio was determined in arms-length negotiations between
Jacor and Clear Channel, in which negotiations DLJ advised Jacor. No
restrictions or limitations were imposed by Jacor upon DLJ with respect to the
investigations made or the procedures followed by DLJ in rendering its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, DLJ reviewed, among other things, the October
7, 1998 draft of the merger agreement and the exhibits thereto. DLJ also
reviewed financial and other information that was publicly available or
furnished to it by Jacor and Clear Channel, including information provided
during discussions with their respective managements. Included in the
information provided to DLJ were certain financial projections of Jacor prepared
by the management of Jacor and certain financial projections of Clear Channel
prepared by the management of Clear Channel. In addition, DLJ compared certain
financial and securities data of Jacor and Clear Channel with various other
companies whose securities are traded in public markets, reviewed the historical
stock prices and trading volumes of Jacor common stock and Clear Channel common
stock, reviewed prices and premiums paid in certain other business combinations
and conducted such other financial studies, analyses and investigations as DLJ
deemed appropriate for purposes of rendering its opinion.
In rendering its opinion, DLJ relied upon and assumed the accuracy,
completeness and fairness of all of the financial and other information that was
available to it from public sources, that was provided to it by Jacor and Clear
Channel or their respective representatives, or that was otherwise reviewed by
it. DLJ also assumed that the financial projections supplied to it were
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments of the respective managements of Jacor and Clear Channel as to the
future operating and financial performance of Jacor and Clear Channel,
50
<PAGE> 57
respectively. DLJ has not assumed any responsibility for making any independent
evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Jacor or Clear Channel,
nor did DLJ independently verify the information reviewed by it. DLJ relied on
the advice of counsel to Jacor as to certain legal matters.
DLJ's opinion is necessarily based on economic, market, financial and other
conditions as they existed on, and on the information made available to DLJ as
of, the date of its opinion. It should be understood that, although subsequent
developments may affect its opinion, DLJ does not have any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm its opinion as a result of changes in such conditions or
otherwise.
Included in the textual discussion below are summaries of certain of the
statistical information appearing in such discussion presented in a tabular
format. While these tables are presented for the purpose of clarity and ease of
reference, they are not substitutes for, and must be read along with, all of the
information appearing under the captions immediately preceding them as well as
all of the information under the caption "--Opinion of Financial Advisor to the
Jacor Board."
Common Stock Trading Price History. DLJ examined the historical closing
prices of Jacor common stock for the period from October 6, 1997 to October 6,
1998 and of Clear Channel common stock for the period from October 6, 1997 to
October 6, 1998. The information appearing in the table below was presented
solely to provide the Jacor board with background regarding the stock prices of
Jacor and Clear Channel over the periods indicated.
SUMMARY OF COMMON STOCK TRADING PRICE HISTORY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLEAR CHANNEL
JACOR COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK
------------------ ----------------
CONSECUTIVE TRADING DAYS ENDING ON OCTOBER 6, 1998 HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
- -------------------------------------------------- ------- ------- ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
10 days......................................... $52.38 $41.66 $50.50 $40.94
20 days......................................... $54.13 $41.66 $50.50 $40.38
30 days......................................... $61.25 $41.66 $53.06 $40.38
60 days......................................... $64.94 $41.66 $61.75 $40.38
90 days......................................... $65.13 $41.66 $61.75 $40.38
One year........................................ $65.13(1) $38.75(2) $61.75(3) $30.00(4)
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) July 13, 1998.
(2) October 28, 1997.
(3) July 20, 1998.
(4) October 28, 1997.
Exchange Ratio Analysis. DLJ reviewed the daily closing prices of Jacor
common stock and Clear Channel common stock to determine the implied exchange
ratio based upon the relative prices of Jacor common stock and Clear Channel
common stock. Based on October 6, 1998 closing prices of $41.66 for Jacor and
$40.94 for Clear Channel, the implied exchange ratio was 1.02x ($41.66 divided
by $40.94). DLJ analyzed the implied exchange ratio between Jacor common stock
and Clear Channel common stock for the period from October 6, 1997 to October 6,
1998. During such period, the average historical implied exchange ratio for the
last twelve months ending on October 6, 1998 was 1.20x. DLJ also calculated the
average historical implied exchange ratios for the last 10, 20, 30,
51
<PAGE> 58
60, and 90 trading days ending on October 6, 1998. The average implied exchange
ratios during each of the foregoing time periods were 1.06x, 1.10x, 1.14x,
1.10x, and 1.10x, respectively.
SUMMARY OF EXCHANGE RATIO ANALYSIS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TIME FRAME AT OR IMMEDIATELY
PRIOR TO OCTOBER 6, 1998 IMPLIED EXCHANGE RATIO
- ---------------------------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
October 6, 1998.................................. 1.02x
10-day average................................... 1.06x
20-day average................................... 1.10x
30-day average................................... 1.14x
60-day average................................... 1.10x
90-day average................................... 1.10x
Last 12-months average........................... 1.20x
</TABLE>
Relative Contribution Analysis. DLJ analyzed the relative contribution of
Jacor and Clear Channel to the combined entity (on a purely additive non-GAAP
pro forma basis) with respect to total revenues, broadcast cash flow, EBITDA and
after-tax cash flow. For purposes of DLJ's opinion, as for other purposes in
this document, broadcast cash flow is defined as net income before interest
expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and corporate expenses, EBITDA
is defined as net income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization, and after-tax cash flow is defined as net income before
depreciation, amortization, deferred taxes and interest expense on dilutive
convertible securities. This analysis was performed for the projected results
for the fiscal years ending December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1999 (based on
Jacor's and Clear Channel's management projections). Based on an exchange ratio
of 1.40x and the price of Jacor common stock and Clear Channel common stock as
of October 6, 1998 ($41.66 and $40.94 per share, respectively), Jacor and Clear
Channel provided 24.6% and 75.4%, respectively, of the combined equity value on
such a pro forma basis (including shares underlying outstanding options using
the treasury stock method) and 27.8% and 72.2%, respectively, of the combined
enterprise value. For purposes of DLJ's opinion, enterprise value is defined as
(A) the product of the stock price and total shares outstanding plus (B) total
debt and preferred equity less cash and cash equivalents and unconsolidated
investments. This compares with Jacor's contribution to the combined entity's
December 31, 1998 pro forma results of approximately 33.9% of revenues, 29.8% of
broadcast cash flow, 30.0% of EBITDA and 24.0% of after-tax cash flow. Jacor's
contribution to the combined entity's December 31, 1999 pro forma results are
approximately 34.8% of revenues, 31.5% of broadcast cash flow, 31.8% of EBITDA
and 26.7% of after-tax cash flow.
52
<PAGE> 59
SUMMARY OF RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION ANALYSIS(1)
Jacor Pro Forma Contribution to Combined Entity
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 EST. 1999 EST.
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue................................................... 33.9% 34.8%
BCF(2).................................................... 29.8% 31.5%
EBITDA(3)................................................. 30.0% 31.8%
ATCF(4)................................................... 24.0% 26.7%
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Jacor share of combined entity equity value................. 24.6%
Jacor share of combined entity Enterprise value............. 27.8%
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Data was calculated by adding Jacor's and Clear Channel's figures and assume
no synergies or cost savings. The methodology used to calculate the data was
not based on GAAP accounting. Data is based on estimates of each company
provided by their respective management. The data is presented assuming the
exchange rate of 1.40x or a transaction price of $57.31 per share of Jacor
common stock.
(2) BCF is defined as net income before interest expense, income taxes,
depreciation, amortization and corporate expenses.
(3) EBITDA is defined as net income before interest expense, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization.
(4) ATCF is defined as net income before depreciation, amortization, deferred
taxes and interest expense on dilutive convertible securities.
Pro Forma After-Tax Cash Flow per Share Analysis and Pro Forma Value per
Share Analysis. DLJ analyzed certain pro forma effects on the after-tax cash
flow per share of Jacor and Clear Channel resulting from the merger. The
analysis used (A) after-tax cash flow estimates for Jacor and Clear Channel
prepared by their respective management and (B) after-tax cash flow estimates
derived from published research analysts' reports prepared by investment banking
firms, including DLJ. The analysis did not take into account any realization of
operating synergies achievable as a result of the merger, or restructuring
charges and non-recurring transaction costs related to the merger.
The analysis indicated that on a pro forma basis using management estimates
and assuming an exchange ratio of 1.40x applied to the October 6, 1998 prices
for Jacor common stock ($41.66 per share) and Clear Channel common stock ($40.94
per share), the after-tax cash flow per share of Clear Channel would be $0.07,
or 3.7%, greater in the fiscal year ending December 31, 1999 than the management
estimates indicate for Clear Channel as a stand-alone entity during the same
period (and would be dilutive to the after-tax cash flow per share of Jacor as
compared to a stand-alone basis). The analysis also indicated that on a pro
forma basis using estimates published in research analysts' reports prepared by
investment banking firms, including DLJ, and assuming an exchange ratio of 1.40x
applied to the October 6, 1998 prices for Jacor common stock ($41.66 per share)
and Clear Channel common stock ($40.94 per share), the after-tax cash flow per
share of Clear Channel would be $0.04, or 2.1%, greater in the fiscal year
ending December 31, 1999 than the research analyst estimates indicate for Clear
Channel as a
53
<PAGE> 60
stand-alone entity during the same period (and would be dilutive to the
after-tax cash flow per share of Jacor as compared to a stand-alone basis).
SUMMARY OF PRO FORMA AFTER-TAX CASH FLOW PER SHARE ANALYSIS(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BASED ON BASED ON
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ANALYST
ESTIMATES ESTIMATES(2)
---------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Absolute effect of transaction on Clear Channel 1999
ATCF per share.................................... $0.07 $0.04
Percentage effect of transaction on Clear Channel
1999 ATCF per share............................... 3.7% 2.1%
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Data presented was based on an exchange rate of 1.40x or a transaction price
of $57.31 per share of Jacor common stock. The data was calculated by adding
Jacor's and Clear Channel's ATCF figures and assume no synergies or cost
savings. The methodology used to calculate the data was not based on GAAP
accounting.
(2) Based on estimates published most recently by a research analyst prior to
October 6, 1998.
DLJ calculated the pro forma value of an equivalent share of Jacor common
stock. The analysis described below indicated a range of pro forma values per
equivalent share of Jacor common stock of $36.37 to $59.45. This analysis was
based on: (A) an exchange ratio of 1.40x; (B) the pro forma projected fiscal
year 1999 after-tax cash flow per share of Jacor using management estimates; and
(C) an after-tax cash flow multiple equal to the ratio of common stock price to
projected after-tax cash flow per share of Clear Channel common stock. DLJ
assumed a closing price per share of Jacor common stock and Clear Channel common
stock on October 6, 1998 of $41.66 and $40.94, respectively, and concluded that
such after-tax cash flow multiple (using management estimates) of Jacor common
stock would have been 12.6x, and such after-tax cash flow multiple (using
management estimates) of Clear Channel common stock would have been 20.5x.
Accordingly, the range of such after-tax cash flow multiples for this analysis
was applied using a minimum of 12.6x and a maximum of 20.5x.
Analysis of Certain Other Publicly Traded Companies. To provide comparative
market information, DLJ compared selected historical common stock prices,
earnings and operating and financial ratios for Jacor to the corresponding data
and ratios of certain comparable companies whose securities are publicly traded,
including Clear Channel, based on October 6, 1998 prices for the stocks of these
comparable companies, projections derived from published research analysts'
reports prepared by investment banking firms, including DLJ, and consideration
per share of Jacor common stock of $57.31 (based on an exchange ratio of 1.40x
and October 6, 1998 prices) and $52.50 (based on the walk-away price per share
of $37.50 for Clear Channel common stock and an exchange ratio of 1.40x). The
comparable companies were chosen because they possess general business,
operating, and financial characteristics representative of companies in the
industry in which Jacor operates. The comparable companies consisted of: Clear
Channel, Chancellor Media Corporation, CBS Corporation, Cox Radio, Inc., Heftel
Broadcasting Corporation, Emmis
54
<PAGE> 61
Communications Corporation and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. Such data and
ratios included enterprise value as a multiple of projected broadcast cash flow
and projected EBITDA for 1998 and 1999 calculated based upon estimates contained
in published research analysts' research reports prepared by investment banking
firms, including DLJ.
The multiples of enterprise value to projected 1998 broadcast cash flow for
the comparable companies ranged from 8.7x to 26.8x, compared to 19.4x for Clear
Channel and 18.0x for Jacor based on an assumed consideration per share of Jacor
common stock of $57.31. The multiple of enterprise value to projected 1998
broadcast cash flow was 16.8x for Jacor based on an assumed consideration per
share of Jacor common stock of $52.50. The multiples of enterprise value to
projected 1998 EBITDA for the comparable companies ranged from 9.1x to 29.2x,
compared to 20.4x for Clear Channel and 19.1x for Jacor based on an assumed
consideration per share of Jacor common stock of $57.31. The multiple of
enterprise value to projected 1998 EBITDA was 17.9x for Jacor based on an
assumed consideration per share of Jacor common stock of $52.50. The multiples
of enterprise value to projected 1999 broadcast cash flow for the comparable
companies ranged from 7.9x to 20.3x, compared to 16.9x for Clear Channel and
15.4x for Jacor based on an assumed consideration per share of Jacor common
stock of $57.31. The multiple of enterprise value to projected 1999 broadcast
cash flow was 14.4x for Jacor based on an assumed consideration per share of
Jacor common stock of $52.50. The multiples of enterprise value to projected
1999 EBITDA for the comparable companies ranged from 8.2x to 21.7x, compared to
17.7x for Clear Channel and 16.3x for Jacor based on assumed consideration per
share of Jacor common stock of $57.31. The multiple of enterprise value to
projected 1999 EBITDA was 15.2x for Jacor based on an assumed consideration per
share of Jacor common stock of $52.50.
In addition, DLJ examined the 1998 and 1999 after-tax cash flow multiples
(based on reported closing prices on October 6, 1998 and projected fiscal year
1998 and 1999 after-tax cash flow estimates calculated relying upon estimates
contained in published research analysts' reports prepared by investment banks,
including DLJ). The 1998 after-tax cash flow multiples for the comparable
companies ranged from 7.0x to 33.3x, while the 1998 after-tax cash flow multiple
was 25.9x for Clear Channel and 22.7x for Jacor based on an assumed
consideration per share of Jacor common stock of $57.31. The 1998 after-tax cash
flow multiple was 20.8x for Jacor based on an assumed consideration per share of
Jacor common stock of $52.50. The 1999 after-tax cash flow multiples for the
comparable companies ranged from 5.7x to 26.6x, while the 1999 after-tax cash
flow multiple was 21.0x for Clear Channel and 18.8x for Jacor based on an
assumed consideration per share of Jacor common stock of $57.31. The 1999
after-tax cash flow multiple was 17.2x for Jacor based on an assumed
consideration per share of Jacor common stock of $52.50.
No other company utilized in DLJ's analysis of certain comparable publicly
traded companies is identical to Jacor or Clear Channel. Accordingly, such
analysis necessarily involves complex considerations and judgements concerning
differences in financial and operating characteristics of Jacor and Clear
Channel and other factors that could affect the public trading values of Jacor,
Clear Channel and the other companies included in such analysis.
55
<PAGE> 62
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS OF CERTAIN OTHER PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANIES(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL ENTERPRISE VALUE TO SHARE PRICE TO
--------------------------------------------- -----------------------
1998 EST. 1998 EST. 1999 EST. 1999 EST. 1998 EST. 1999 EST.
BCF EBITDA BCF EBITDA ATCF/SHARE ATCF/SHARE
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Jacor at transaction
price of $57.31....... 18.0x 19.1x 15.4x 16.3x 22.7x 18.8x
Jacor at walk-away price
of $52.50............. 16.8x 17.9x 14.4x 15.2x 20.8x 17.2x
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Clear Channel........... 19.4x 20.4x 16.9x 17.7x 25.9x 21.0x
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Average for selected
group(2).............. 14.7x 15.7x 12.5x 13.1x 18.9x 14.6x
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Estimates were based on data derived from published research analysts'
reports prepared by investment banking firms, including DLJ. The number of
shares outstanding was calculated using the treasury method and assuming
conversion of Jacor's Liquid Yield Option(TM) Notes due June 12, 2011.
(2) Includes Clear Channel.
Comparable Transaction Analysis. DLJ reviewed 10 selected comparable
acquisitions announced since January 1996 with transaction values greater than
$600 million. The comparable transactions included Chancellor Media
Corporation's acquisition of Capstar Broadcasting Corporation, Jacor's
acquisition of Nationwide Communications, Inc., CBS Corporation's acquisition of
American Radio Systems Corporation, Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst Inc.'s acquisition
of SFX Broadcasting, Inc., Clear Channel's acquisition of certain radio stations
from Paxson Communications Corp., Evergreen Media Corporation's acquisition of
Chancellor Broadcasting Company, Evergreen Media Corporation's acquisition of
certain radio assets from Viacom International, Inc., American Radio Systems
Corporation's acquisition of EZ Communications, Inc., Westinghouse Electric
Corporation's acquisition of Infinity Broadcasting Corporation and Jacor's
acquisition of Citicasters Inc.
For purposes of the comparable transaction analysis, total transaction
value was calculated as the aggregate purchase price of equity (in the case of
stock purchases), or the aggregate purchase price of the assets (in the case of
asset purchases), plus total debt and preferred equity less cash and cash
equivalents. For each of the comparable transactions, DLJ calculated a forward
broadcast cash flow multiple representing the ratio of transaction value to
forward broadcast cash flow values. Forward broadcast cash flow for purposes of
such analysis was defined as broadcast cash flow for the twelve months ended one
year from announcement of the relevant transaction. The analysis resulted in an
average forward broadcast cash flow multiple of 15.1x (excluding the high value
of 23.4x and low value of 11.1x) for the comparable transactions (implying a
price per share of Jacor common stock of $45.25), compared to 18.0x for Jacor
based on an assumed consideration per share of Jacor common stock of $57.31. The
analysis resulted in a forward broadcast cash flow multiple of 16.8x for Jacor
based on an assumed consideration per share of Jacor common stock of $52.50.
No transaction utilized in the comparable transaction analysis is identical
to the merger. Accordingly, such analysis necessarily involves complex
considerations and
56
<PAGE> 63
judgements concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of
Jacor and Clear Channel and other factors that could affect the acquisition
value of the companies to which they are being compared.
SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FORWARD BCF MULTIPLE(1)
-----------------------
<S> <C>
Jacor at transaction price of $57.31..................... 18.0x
Jacor at walk-away price of $52.50....................... 16.8x
----
Average for selected group(2)............................ 15.1x
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Forward BCF is defined as broadcast cash flow for the twelve months ended
one year from announcement of the relevant transaction.
(2) Excludes the high value of 23.4x and the low value of 11.1x.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. DLJ performed a discounted cash flow
analysis for the three-year period ending with fiscal year 2000 on the
stand-alone unlevered free cash flows of Jacor and Clear Channel, using
financial projections provided by the respective managements of both companies.
Unlevered free cash flows were calculated as: (A) the projected EBIT adjusted
for taxes; (B) plus projected depreciation and amortization; (C) plus (or minus)
projected net changes in working capital; and (D) minus projected capital
expenditures. DLJ calculated terminal values by applying a range of estimated
EBITDA multiples of 13.0x to 15.0x to projected EBITDA of Jacor and 18.5x to
20.5x to projected EBITDA of Clear Channel in the fiscal year 2000. The
unlevered free cash flows and terminal values were then discounted to the
present using a range of discount rates of 9.5% to 11.5%, representing an
estimated range of the weighted average cost of capital for Jacor and Clear
Channel and other subjective judgements including industry prospects. Based on
this analysis and using management estimates, DLJ calculated values per share of
Jacor common stock ranging from $49.42 to $62.61 and of Clear Channel common
stock ranging from $47.33 to $54.95, resulting in implied exchange ratios of
1.04x to 1.14x.
SUMMARY OF DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IMPLIED RANGE OF
PRESENT VALUE PER
SHARE OF COMMON STOCK(1)
------------------------
<S> <C>
Jacor.................................................... $49.42 to $62.61
Clear Channel............................................ $47.33 to $54.95
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Range calculated by applying estimated EBITDA multiples of 13.0x to 15.0x to
projected EBITDA of Jacor and 18.5x to 20.5x to projected EBITDA of Clear
Channel. Unlevered free cash flows and terminal values were discounted to
the present using a range of 9.5% to 11.5%.
The summary set forth above describes the material elements of the
presentation made by DLJ to the Jacor board on October 7, 1998. The preparation
of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most appropriate
and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of these methods
to the particular circumstances and,
57
<PAGE> 64
therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description.
Each of the analyses conducted by DLJ was carried out in order to provide a
different perspective on the transaction and add to the total mix of information
available. DLJ did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual analysis,
considered in isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion as to
fairness from a financial point of view. Rather, in reaching its conclusion, DLJ
considered the results of the analyses in light of each other and ultimately
reached its opinion based on the results of all analyses taken as a whole. DLJ
did not place particular reliance or weight on any individual analysis, but
instead concluded that its analyses, taken as a whole, supported its
determination. Accordingly, notwithstanding the separate factors summarized
above, DLJ believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that
selecting portions of its analysis and the factors considered by it, without
considering all analyses and factors, could create an incomplete or misleading
view of the evaluation process underlying its opinions. In performing its
analyses, DLJ made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance,
business and economic conditions and other matters. The analyses performed by
DLJ are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may
be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses.
Pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter, dated October 6, 1998, Jacor
agreed to pay DLJ (A) a fee of $1.8 million upon notification that DLJ was
prepared to deliver its opinion and (B) an additional fee of $9.0 million, less
the initial $1.8 million fee, which amount will be paid upon consummation of the
merger. Jacor has also agreed to reimburse DLJ promptly for all out-of-pocket
expenses, including the reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses of counsel,
incurred by DLJ in connection with its engagement, and to indemnify DLJ and
related persons against liabilities in connection with its engagement, including
liabilities under the federal securities laws. The terms of the fee arrangement
with DLJ, which DLJ and Jacor believe are customary in transactions of this
nature, were negotiated at arms-length between Jacor and DLJ and the Jacor board
was aware of such arrangement, including the fact that a significant portion of
the aggregate fee payable to DLJ is contingent upon consummation of the merger.
In the ordinary course of business, DLJ may actively trade the securities
of both Jacor and Clear Channel for its own account and for the accounts of its
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities.
DLJ, as part of its investment banking services, is regularly engaged in
the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers,
acquisition, underwritings, sales and distributions of listed and unlisted
securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
DLJ has performed investment banking and other services for Jacor in the past
and has received usual and customary compensation for such services, including
in the past two years (A) acting as a lead manager in a $170 million senior
subordinated notes offering in December 1996, (B) acting as a lead manager in a
$229 million common stock offering in May 1997, (C) acting as a sole placement
agent in a $150 million senior subordinated notes offering in June 1997, and (D)
acting as a lead manager in a $256 million common stock offering and a $120
million senior subordinated notes offering in February 1998.
58
<PAGE> 65
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Until December 31, 1999, Clear Channel will directly or indirectly provide
Jacor employees the same compensation, benefits, programs, policies and
arrangements provided by Jacor at the time of the merger. Clear Channel will not
merge Jacor's 401(k) plan into its 401(k) plan or merge its 401(k) plan into
Jacor's 401(k) plan until Clear Channel enters into an agreement with the
Internal Revenue Service that its 401(k) plan qualifies under Section 401(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code. Clear Channel will give each employee of Jacor and
its subsidiaries credit for all service to Jacor and its subsidiaries under all
applicable employee benefit plans that Clear Channel maintains and in which
these employees participate for purposes of eligibility, vesting and benefit
accrual.
JACOR CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS
The merger will trigger certain rights and benefits granted to some key
executives of Jacor under the terms of change in control agreements currently in
effect between Jacor and such key executives. Particularly, the surviving
corporation must provide continuing benefits following a termination of any such
executive's employment with the surviving corporation during the two-year period
after the merger. The surviving corporation must provide the continuing benefits
only if the surviving corporation terminates the employment for reasons defined
in the agreements to be "without cause" or if the executive terminates the
employment for reasons defined in the agreements to be "for good reason." The
continuing benefits vary with the executive's level of responsibility, but
generally include the following:
- all compensation accrued through the date of termination;
- a severance payment in the amount of one, two, or three times the sum of
the executive's highest base salary for the three years preceding the
date of termination and the executive's target bonus amount for the year
preceding the date of termination;
- the continuation of life, medical, dental and hospitalization benefits
for up to three years following the date of termination; and
- and a payment of 20% of the executive's base salary to be used for
out-placement services.
JACOR STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
As a result of the merger, all options and stock appreciation rights for
Jacor common stock not vested at the effective time of the merger become fully
vested and exercisable one day before the effective time of the merger. Clear
Channel will assume all of these options and stock appreciation rights on the
same terms and conditions as were applicable prior to the effective time of the
merger. The holders may exercise such options and stock appreciation rights for
or with respect to shares of Clear Channel common stock at an exercise price
adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio of the merger. See "Terms of the Merger
Agreement -- The Effect of the Merger on Jacor's Convertible Securities."
59
<PAGE> 66
JACOR STOCK UNITS
An aggregate of 18,803 stock units granted to Jacor's non-employee
directors remain outstanding. Jacor granted such stock units in lieu of cash
director fees and a special bonus. The holders of such stock units may convert
each unit into one share of Jacor common stock at times established by each
director in advance of the award date, generally the earlier of when such
individual no longer serves as a Jacor director and/or when Jacor common stock
exceeds a designated price for a specified time period. An aggregate of 22,487
stock units granted in 1996 to certain executive officers of Jacor (including
9,569 stock units to each of Messrs. Michaels and Lawrence) also remain
outstanding. The holders of such stock units may convert each unit into one
share of Jacor common stock at the earlier of the executive officer's
retirement, death, permanent disability or separation from service or upon a
change in control of Jacor. See "Terms of the Merger Agreement -- The Effect of
the Merger on Jacor's Convertible Securities" for a description of the treatment
of such stock units as a result of the merger.
EQUITY GROUP INVESTMENTS, INC. ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Equity Group Investments, Inc. and Jacor entered into an advisory agreement
in August 1998 pursuant to which Equity Group Investments agreed to provide
consulting services to Jacor with respect to any proposed merger, acquisition,
or other similar transaction. As a result of the merger, Equity Group
Investments will receive an advisory fee in an amount equal to 75 basis points
of the equity value of the transaction, calculated on a fully diluted basis.
Assuming an average closing price of Clear Channel common stock of $61.06 during
the 25 consecutive trading days ending two trading days before the completion of
the merger and a closing price of Clear Channel common stock of $57.94 on the
date the merger is completed, the advisory fee would equal approximately $33.6
million.
VOTING AGREEMENTS
Certain stockholders of Jacor entered into voting agreements with Clear
Channel as an inducement for Clear Channel to enter into the merger agreement.
Likewise, certain stockholders of Clear Channel entered into a voting agreement
with Jacor as an inducement for Jacor to enter into the merger agreement.
Pursuant to these voting agreements, the Jacor stockholders agreed to vote in
favor of the Jacor merger proposal, so long as the Jacor board has not changed
it, and the Clear Channel stockholders agreed to vote in favor of the Clear
Channel merger proposal. Each of these stockholders also agreed to vote against
certain extraordinary corporate transactions, asset sales, issuances of
securities, certain board changes and other actions which could delay or prevent
the merger, unless the merger agreement specifically permits such actions.
The voting agreements also impose certain stock transfer restrictions. In
particular, the Jacor stockholders subject to the voting agreements with Clear
Channel may not sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any shares of Jacor
common stock or any interest in such shares during a restriction period which
begins 57 trading days before the expected closing date of the merger and ends
on the second trading day before the estimated closing date. After consultation
with the general counsel of Jacor, the general counsel of Clear Channel will
select the estimated closing date for purposes of determining the restriction
period. The Clear Channel general counsel may subsequently change the estimated
closing date by
60
<PAGE> 67
complying with certain notice requirements and other procedures specified in the
voting agreements. In addition to the transfer restrictions applicable to shares
of Jacor common stock, each Jacor stockholder subject to the voting agreements
with Clear Channel also agreed not to sell or trade any equity security of Clear
Channel or enter into any derivative transaction which has a similar economic
effect during the restriction period.
Each Clear Channel stockholder subject to the voting agreement with Jacor
agreed not to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any shares of Clear Channel
common stock or any interest in such shares if:
- the number of shares proposed for disposition or a derivative transaction
having a similar economic effect taken together with all other such
dispositions made during the period from October 8, 1998 through the date
of the Clear Channel stockholders' meeting by all Clear Channel
stockholders subject to the voting agreement, exceeds 1% of the Clear
Channel common stock then outstanding; or
- the proposed disposition or a derivative transaction having a similar
economic effect, is reasonably likely to impact the average closing price
of Clear Channel common stock during the 25 consecutive trading days
ending two trading days before the completion of the merger.
If a Jacor stockholder subject to a voting agreement with Clear Channel
ceases to hold any shares of Jacor common stock, then his or her voting
agreement will terminate at such time. Likewise, a Clear Channel stockholder
subject to the voting agreement with Jacor will have the agreement terminated
when such stockholder ceases to hold any shares of Clear Channel common stock.
Otherwise, all of these voting agreements terminate when the merger is completed
or, if the merger is not completed, when the merger agreement is terminated. The
parties can also mutually agree to terminate the voting agreements at an earlier
date.
The Jacor stockholders bound by voting agreements with Clear Channel are
Samuel Zell, Zell/Chilmark Fund L.P., Samstock, L.L.C. and SZ2 (IGP)
Partnership. As of the record date for the Jacor stockholders' meeting, these
stockholders held approximately 27.0% of the outstanding shares of Jacor common
stock. The Clear Channel stockholders bound by a voting agreement with Jacor are
L. Lowry Mays, Randall T. Mays and Mark P. Mays. As of the record date for the
Clear Channel stockholders' meeting, these stockholders held approximately 12.1%
of the outstanding shares of Clear Channel common stock.
A form of voting agreement entered into between Clear Channel and
Zell/Chilmark Fund L.P. is attached to this document as Annex B. The voting
agreements entered into with Clear Channel by Samuel Zell, Samstock, L.L.C. and
SZ2 (IGP) Partnership are similar. A copy of the voting agreement entered into
by L. Lowry Mays, Randall T. Mays and Mark P. Mays with Jacor is attached to
this document as Annex C.
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
In connection with the merger agreement, Clear Channel granted Samuel Zell,
Zell/Chilmark Fund L.P., Samstock, L.L.C. and SZ2 (IGP) Partnership the right to
require Clear Channel to file registration statements with the SEC to register
all shares of Clear Channel common stock they receive in the merger in addition
to any Clear Channel
61
<PAGE> 68
common stock they acquire after the merger. These registration rights may also
run to certain affiliates of these Jacor stockholders and financial institutions
to whom any of such Jacor stockholders or affiliates pledge shares of Clear
Channel common stock.
The holders of at least a majority of the Clear Channel common stock to
which the registration rights apply can request that Clear Channel file a shelf
registration statement with the SEC which will permit them to sell such shares
of Clear Channel common stock over an extended period of time as long as the
shelf registration statement remains effective. The registration rights
agreement generally requires Clear Channel to file the shelf registration
statement within 15 days after the request and attempt to cause it to become
effective as soon as practicable. Clear Channel will keep this shelf
registration statement effective for a period of 12 months or such shorter
period as specified by the terms of the registration rights agreement.
In addition to their right to request that Clear Channel file a shelf
registration statement, the holders of at least a majority of the Clear Channel
common stock to which the registration rights apply can also request that Clear
Channel register their shares of Clear Channel common stock according to
particular methods which they specify. The registration rights agreement
generally requires Clear Channel to file a registration statement within 15 days
after the request and attempt to cause it to become effective within 30 days
after it is filed. They have the right to only one such demand registration.
Clear Channel will pay all expenses related to the filing of registration
statements pursuant to the registration rights agreement except:
- underwriting discounts and commissions;
- all out-of-pocket expenses, including those of Clear Channel and its
officers and employees, incurred for analyst or investor presentations or
any "road show";
- legal fees of separate counsel for individual holders, although Clear
Channel will pay legal fees for one legal counsel to represent all
holders; and
- internal costs incurred by the holders of the Clear Channel common stock
subject to registration.
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a discussion, which includes counsels' opinion, of the
material U.S. federal income tax consequences, as well as a discussion of
certain other tax consequences, of the merger. This discussion does not address
all tax consequences that may be relevant to particular taxpayers in light of
their personal circumstances or to taxpayers subject to special treatment under
the Internal Revenue Code including insurance companies, financial institutions,
dealers in securities, tax-exempt organizations, foreign corporations, foreign
partnerships or other foreign entities and individuals who are not citizens or
residents of the United States, persons who do not hold shares of Jacor common
stock as capital assets, persons who hold shares of Jacor common stock as part
of a straddle or a conversion transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
and individuals who received shares of Jacor common stock pursuant to the
exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation.
This discussion provides no information on tax consequences of the merger,
if any, under applicable foreign, state, local and other tax laws. This
discussion is based on the
62
<PAGE> 69
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, applicable Treasury Regulations
thereunder, IRS rulings and judicial decisions in effect as of the date of this
document. We can give no assurance that future legislative, administrative or
judicial changes or interpretations will not affect the accuracy of this
discussion. Any such change or interpretation could apply retroactively and
could affect the accuracy of this discussion. The discussion also is based upon
(i) certain factual representations made by Jacor, Clear Channel and others and
(ii) the assumption that the merger will be consummated in accordance with the
terms of the merger agreement. Neither Clear Channel nor Jacor will seek rulings
from the IRS concerning the tax consequences of the merger.
We urge each Jacor stockholder to consult such stockholder's own tax
advisor as to the specific tax consequences of the merger to such stockholder,
including the application of foreign, state, local and other tax laws.
Based on the assumptions discussed above and upon the representations of
Jacor, Clear Channel and others, it is the opinion of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen &
Hamilton, tax counsel to Jacor, and Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.,
tax counsel to Clear Channel, that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the
merger will constitute a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code, that Jacor, Clear Channel and Clear Channel's merger
subsidiary will each be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, and that, accordingly, none of
Jacor, Clear Channel or Clear Channel's merger subsidiary will recognize gain or
loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the merger and Jacor
stockholders will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax
purposes except to the extent they receive cash in lieu of fractional shares of
Clear Channel common stock. An opinion of counsel is not binding on the IRS and
we can give no assurance that the IRS will not take a position contrary to one
or more positions reflected in such opinions or that the courts will uphold such
opinions if challenged by the IRS.
A Jacor stockholder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of
Clear Channel common stock will be treated as having received this fractional
share as a part of the exchange and having it redeemed by Clear Channel for
cash. Assuming that the redemption of the fractional share of Clear Channel
common stock is characterized as a sale or exchange of such stock and not as a
dividend, such Jacor stockholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the
difference, if any, between the amount of cash so received and the tax basis of
the Jacor common stock allocable to this fractional share. This gain or loss
will constitute capital gain or loss if the stockholder held the Jacor common
stock as a capital asset at the time of the merger and will be long-term capital
gain or loss if the holding period was greater than one year at the effective
time of the merger. Any capital gain recognized as a result of the merger will
be taxed at rates applicable to capital gains. The tax rate applicable to
capital gains of an individual stockholder varies depending on the stockholder's
holding period for the shares. Pursuant to recently enacted legislation, in the
case of an individual, any such capital gain will be subject to a maximum
federal income tax rate of 20% if the stockholder's holding period in such stock
is more than 12 months at the effective time of the merger. The deductibility of
capital losses is subject to limitations for both individuals and corporations.
A Jacor stockholder will have a tax basis in the Clear Channel common stock
received in the merger equal to the tax basis of the stockholder's Jacor common
stock, less the tax basis allocable to any fractional share. The holding period
for such Clear Channel common stock will include the holding period of the
stockholder's Jacor common stock.
63
<PAGE> 70
The obligation of each of Jacor and Clear Channel to consummate the merger
is conditioned upon, among other things, the receipt by each of Jacor and Clear
Channel of a tax opinion from each of their respective tax counsels that is
identical in all material respects to the opinions set forth above. The opinions
to be delivered at closing will be based on the facts described therein and upon
certain assumptions and certain representations made by Jacor, Clear Channel and
others. In the event that Jacor or Clear Channel is unable to obtain its
respective opinion of counsel, as set forth above, each of Jacor and Clear
Channel is permitted, under the merger agreement, to waive the receipt of such
opinions as a condition to such party's obligation to consummate the merger. As
of the date of this document, neither Jacor nor Clear Channel intends to waive
the condition as to the receipt of opinions of counsel as set forth herein and
neither party anticipates that the material income tax consequences of the
merger will be materially different than those described above. In the event of
such a failure to obtain tax opinions as set forth above, and a party's
determination to waive such condition to the consummation of the merger, Jacor
and Clear Channel will resolicit the votes of its respective stockholders to
approve the merger.
ANTICIPATED ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
Clear Channel expects to account for the merger as a purchase under
generally accepted accounting principles. Under this accounting method, Clear
Channel will record Jacor's assets and liabilities at their fair market values,
and, if the purchase price exceeds the total of these fair market values, Clear
Channel will record this excess as an intangible asset. After the merger,
Jacor's assets and liabilities and results of operations will be consolidated
with Clear Channel's assets and liabilities and results of operations.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
We must comply with all applicable antitrust and FCC laws and regulations
before we can complete the merger. The FTC and the DOJ will review the potential
effects of the merger on competition in the markets where we operate. If they
determine that the merger will substantially reduce competition, they can
challenge all or certain aspects of the merger and seek to block the merger or
impose restrictive conditions on the merger. In addition, the FCC must approve
the transfer of control from Jacor's existing stockholders to Clear Channel's
stockholders. As part of the FCC's determination whether to approve the merger,
the FCC will examine whether the combined company will comply with the FCC's
limits on the number of radio and television stations that a company can own in
a single market. The FCC also conducts additional ownership concentration
analysis and assesses its effect on competition, diversity or other criteria
designated by the FCC. In recent years, the practice in radio acquisitions and
mergers has been for the DOJ to first resolve its issues before the FCC will
grant its approval of the transaction.
It can be a lengthy process to obtain the requisite clearances and
approvals needed from the DOJ and the FCC, sometimes taking more than one year
in large transactions such as this merger. Therefore, we quickly initiated the
formal process of obtaining the required regulatory approvals. We filed our
application for the consent to transfer control of Jacor with the FCC on October
16, 1998 and we filed our notification and report forms required for antitrust
purposes with the DOJ on November 3, 1998. We then commenced
64
<PAGE> 71
discussions with the DOJ to try to identify their specific concerns about the
merger and to discuss possible solutions as early as possible.
From the outset, we recognized that the merger would result in the combined
company exceeding FCC limitations in Cleveland, Dayton, Jacksonville, Louisville
and Tampa on the number of radio stations that one company may own in those
particular markets. Accordingly, we knew that we would have to divest at least
18 stations in the aggregate in those markets to comply with the FCC's numerical
limits. For FCC purposes, we must divest the necessary number of radio stations
to comply with FCC limits prior to completion of the merger. If we cannot
complete such transactions in a timely manner, we will have to transfer those
assets or the assets of other Clear Channel or Jacor stations into an FCC
approved trust prior to closing the merger.
We also knew that if the DOJ had concerns about the concentration of the
radio advertising market held by the combined company in those markets, then we
would have to discuss with the DOJ which stations needed to be divested to come
within their antitrust guidelines. It was possible that we might need to divest
more than 18 stations in those markets to satisfy antitrust concerns. We also
needed to determine if there were any other markets that concerned the DOJ
notwithstanding that we would be within FCC guidelines in those markets.
Based on our discussions with the DOJ during November 1998, we concluded
that our ability to satisfy their possible antitrust concerns in an expeditious
and cost-effective manner would significantly improve if we agreed to divest a
total of 20 radio stations in the five markets identified above. We also
determined that we would need to divest Jacor's right to sell advertising time
for an additional radio station in Louisville and the related option to buy that
station. We have entered into letters of intent with entities who will acquire
all but two of the stations we propose to divest. The 20 radio stations to be
divested are identified in the tables under the heading "Business of
Jacor -- Radio Broadcasting" beginning on page 110 and "Business of Clear
Channel -- Radio Broadcasting" beginning on page 116. Following our divestiture
of those stations, we will own, program or sell air time for 411 radio stations
in 95 U.S. markets.
Since we have identified the entities who will acquire all but two of the
stations that we will divest, on February 8, 9 and 10, 1999, we filed
applications with the FCC to assign the stations to those entities. The DOJ also
is currently reviewing whether those entities are capable of maintaining
competition in those markets and we have not yet obtained clearance of any kind
from the DOJ. We also filed applications with the FCC to assign the remaining
two stations to be divested (and other Clear Channel and Jacor stations, in case
the divestitures agreed upon to date cannot be completed in a timely manner) to
one of two trusts.
As we anticipated, on December 3, 1998 the DOJ issued to us a second
request for information about the effect of the merger in the five affected
markets. We believe that the DOJ issued the second request to preserve the
statutory waiting period beyond the initial 30 day period to ensure that the
divestitures proposed by us are consummated to the DOJ's satisfaction. Until we
either arrange and complete satisfactory divestitures to qualified parties or
comply with the second request, we will not be able to proceed with the merger
for antitrust purposes. As a third alternative, we could enter into a consent
decree with the DOJ where we would agree to complete the divestiture of agreed
upon stations within a specified period of time following the merger. While
Clear Channel agreed in the merger agreement to take any such action as may be
necessary to timely complete the
65
<PAGE> 72
merger, we currently hope to resolve the antitrust issues without entering into
any consent decrees. If practical, we would like to avoid being subject in the
five affected markets to additional operating restrictions that typically are
contained in a consent decree and which can last for up to 10 years following
the merger.
Two petitions to deny our application for the merger were filed at the FCC
by the petition deadline by competitors and the FCC is required to consider
those petitions. We have already responded to those petitions and have informed
the FCC why we believe those petitions should be denied. There is also a
petition to deny the transfer of an ancillary FCC authorization filed by a third
party. We have responded that this petition should also be denied by the FCC.
Although we do not expect that these or any other third party petitions will be
a significant obstacle to completion of the merger, we can give no assurances in
this regard. Such petitions could also cause a delay in our receipt of FCC
approval.
The merger also implicates the FCC's "one-to-a-market" rule which prohibits
a single entity from owning or controlling a television station and radio
station(s) in the same market. The FCC has separately granted Clear Channel and
Jacor temporary conditional waivers of the rule to permit television and radio
ownership in Jacksonville and Cincinnati, respectively. Such waivers are
conditioned upon the outcome of the FCC's ongoing rulemaking proceeding
considering the future of the "one-to-a-market" rule. Clear Channel has
requested in the FCC application further temporary conditional waivers of the
"one-to-a-market" rule relating to Jacksonville and Cincinnati. The FCC would
condition such waivers upon the outcome of the FCC's ongoing rulemaking
proceeding considering the future of the "one-to-a-market" rule if the
rulemaking proceeding is still pending. Any changes to the "one-to-a-market"
rule could adversely affect the merger and Clear Channel after the merger.
Although we are hopeful that our proposed divestiture of 20 radio stations
will result in compliance with all antitrust and FCC concerns, it is still
possible that the DOJ, the FCC and/or a state antitrust agency could require us
to divest additional assets or to agree to various operating restrictions. This
could happen at any time before or after stockholders vote on the merger or even
after the merger is completed. In addition, private persons may assert antitrust
claims against us in certain circumstances. If any of those events occur, we may
incur substantial expense in litigating any such claims and/or we may be
adversely affected by any operating restrictions that might be imposed upon us.
In addition, we cannot give you any current assurances that the terms of
all of our proposed divestitures will be at a price, or exchanged for equivalent
assets, that we believe reflects the full value of the assets being divested. We
also may not be able to reinvest cash proceeds from the divestitures in new
assets that produce the same level of profits or return on investment as we
obtained from the divested assets. However, even if we are not able to obtain
full value for the divested assets, we believe that our contemplated
divestitures will not have a material adverse effect on us.
PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP INTEREST OF JACOR STOCKHOLDERS AFTER THE MERGER
In the merger, Jacor stockholders will become stockholders of Clear
Channel. Based on the number of shares of Clear Channel and Jacor common stock
currently outstanding and assuming an exchange ratio of 1.228, we estimate that
the Clear Channel common stock to be issued to Jacor stockholders will represent
approximately 19.2% of the outstanding Clear Channel common stock after the
merger.
66
<PAGE> 73
ABSENCE OF APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Jacor common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market. The Clear
Channel common stock to be received by the Jacor stockholders will be listed on
the NYSE. As a result, Jacor stockholders will not be entitled to appraisal
rights under Delaware law in connection with the merger. Likewise, Clear Channel
stockholders will not be entitled to appraisal rights under Texas law in
connection with the merger.
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
As a condition to the merger, the NYSE must authorize the listing on the
NYSE of the Clear Channel common stock to be issued in the merger, subject only
to official notice of issuance.
CERTAIN CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
Jacor will merge with and into Clear Channel's merger subsidiary and will
cease to exist as a separate legal entity. Clear Channel's wholly-owned merger
subsidiary will be the surviving corporation to the merger. Following the
merger, Jacor common stock will no longer be traded on the Nasdaq National
Market, will be deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and will
no longer be publicly traded. Following the merger, the Jacor LYONs and Jacor
warrants will remain outstanding. Until the Jacor LYONs and Jacor warrants cease
to be outstanding or Clear Channel deregisters the Jacor LYONs and Jacor
warrants, the surviving corporation will file periodic reports under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Following the merger, the LYONs and warrants of
Jacor outstanding at the time of the merger will become convertible into or
exercisable for Clear Channel common stock. Such conversion or exercise would be
for that number of shares of Clear Channel common stock that the holder would
have received if he or she had converted or exercised for shares of Jacor common
stock immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, as adjusted to
reflect the exchange ratio of the merger. The warrants will continue to be
traded on the Nasdaq National Market, and the LYONs will continue to be traded
on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
MANAGEMENT AFTER THE MERGER
At the time Jacor merges into Clear Channel's merger subsidiary, the
directors of Clear Channel's merger subsidiary immediately before the merger
will remain the directors of the surviving corporation, and the officers of
Jacor immediately before the merger will become the officers of the surviving
corporation.
RESALES OF CLEAR CHANNEL COMMON STOCK
All shares of Clear Channel common stock to be issued in the merger will be
freely transferable, except for shares received by any person who may be deemed
to be an affiliate of Jacor under Rule 145 under the Securities Act, such as
directors and certain executive officers of Jacor. Under Rule 145, an affiliate
of Jacor may not resell his or her shares of Clear Channel common stock received
in the merger except in transactions permitted by Rule 145 or as otherwise
permitted under the Securities Act, including selling such shares pursuant to an
effective registration statement. Jacor will deliver to Clear Channel a list
setting forth the names and addresses of all persons who are, at the time of the
Jacor stockholders' meeting, in Jacor's reasonable judgment, affiliates of
Jacor. Clear
67
<PAGE> 74
Channel granted certain affiliates of Jacor the right to require Clear Channel
to register their Clear Channel Common Stock so that they may sell such shares
without being subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 145. See
"-- Registration Rights Agreement."
TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
CONVERSION OF SHARES IN THE MERGER
As of the effective time of the merger, by virtue of the merger and without
any additional action on the part of the Jacor stockholders or the stockholders
of Clear Channel's merger subsidiary:
- each share of Jacor common stock issued and outstanding immediately
before the effective time of the merger will be converted into a number
of shares of Clear Channel common stock determined by the exchange ratio.
Clear Channel will not issue any fractional shares of its common stock to
Jacor stockholders. Rather, Clear Channel will pay the Jacor stockholders
cash for these fractional shares. For more information regarding
fractional shares, see "The Merger -- No Fractional Shares;"
- each share of common stock of Clear Channel's merger subsidiary
outstanding immediately before the effective time of the merger will
become one share of common stock of the surviving corporation; and
- each share of Jacor common stock held, immediately before the effective
time of the merger, in Jacor's treasury, by any of Jacor's direct or
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, and by Clear Channel, Clear Channel's
merger subsidiary or any other subsidiary of Clear Channel, will
automatically be cancelled and retired and will cease to exist, and Clear
Channel will pay no consideration for these shares.
The Jacor common stock converted as described above will no longer be
outstanding, will automatically be cancelled and retired, and will cease to
exist. Each holder of Jacor common stock will cease to have any rights in Jacor
common stock, except the right to receive the appropriate number of shares of
Clear Channel common stock, cash in lieu of fractional shares and dividends, if
any, declared with a record date after the effective time of the merger. For
information regarding how to exchange Jacor common stock, see "-- Exchange
Agent; Procedures for Exchange of Certificates."
EXCHANGE AGENT; PROCEDURES FOR EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
After the merger, Clear Channel will appoint a bank or trust company to
serve as the exchange agent and will deliver to the exchange agent certificates
representing the number of shares of Clear Channel common stock to be issued to
Jacor stockholders in the merger. The exchange agent will, according to
irrevocable instructions, deliver to the Jacor stockholders the Clear Channel
common stock, any dividends or other distributions relating to such stock, and
any cash in lieu of fractional shares.
The exchange agent will mail to each Jacor stockholder a letter of
transmittal and instructions to surrender their certificates representing Jacor
common stock in exchange for certificates representing Clear Channel common
stock or cash in lieu of fractional shares. After a Jacor stockholder surrenders
his or her Jacor common stock certificate along with
68
<PAGE> 75
a duly executed and properly completed letter of transmittal and other required
documents, the exchange agent will deliver to such stockholder the following:
- a certificate representing the number of whole shares of Clear Channel
common stock to which such stockholder is entitled;
- cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Clear Channel common stock; and
- the amount of any dividends or other distributions declared on Clear
Channel common stock with a record date after the effective time of the
merger and a payment date before surrender of the Jacor common stock.
Jacor stockholders receiving Clear Channel common stock in the merger will
receive a payment at the appropriate payment date of the amount of dividends or
other distributions declared on Clear Channel common stock with a record date
after the effective time of the merger and a payment date after surrender of the
Jacor common stock.
The surviving corporation and the exchange agent may deduct and withhold
from the consideration payable to Jacor stockholders amounts required to be
deducted and withheld under the Internal Revenue Code, or any provision of
state, local or foreign tax law. If the surviving corporation or the exchange
agent deducts or withholds any amounts so required to be deducted or withheld,
then these amounts will be treated, for all purposes of the merger agreement, as
having been paid to the Jacor stockholders with respect to whom such amounts
were deducted or withheld.
JACOR STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD NOT FORWARD THEIR JACOR COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATES
WITH THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD NOR SHOULD THEY FORWARD THEIR JACOR COMMON STOCK
CERTIFICATES TO THE EXCHANGE AGENT UNTIL THEY HAVE RECEIVED THE PACKET OF
INFORMATION, INCLUDING A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, DESCRIBED ABOVE.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The merger agreement contains various representations and warranties of
Clear Channel, Jacor and Clear Channel's merger subsidiary, relating to, among
other things, the following:
- their incorporation, existence, good standing, corporate power and
similar corporate matters;
- their capitalization;
- their authorization, execution, delivery and performance and the
enforceability of the merger agreement, other agreements and related
matters, and the absence of violations;
- the documents, reports and financial statements filed with the SEC and
the accuracy and completeness of the information contained therein;
- the absence of undisclosed liabilities;
- compliance with laws, ordinances and regulations;
- environmental matters;
- employee benefit matters;
- the absence of certain material changes or events since June 30, 1998;
- pending or threatened investigations or litigation;
69
<PAGE> 76
- the registration statement and this document and the accuracy and
completeness of the information contained therein and herein and in the
merger agreement;
- the lack of ownership of each other's stock;
- tax matters;
- the receipt of opinions of financial advisors;
- required vote of stockholders;
- insurance;
- real property and title;
- collective bargaining agreements and labor matters; and
- material contracts.
In addition, the merger agreement contains a representation and warranty of
Jacor relating to, among other things, applicable state takeover statutes and
stockholder approval under Delaware law.
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PENDING THE MERGER
The merger agreement requires that until completion of the merger or
termination of the merger agreement, Clear Channel, Jacor and their subsidiaries
will conduct their operations according to their ordinary and usual course of
business. The merger agreement does not, however, limit Clear Channel's
discretion with respect to the issuance of debt or equity securities or
acquisitions, except for acquisitions that would adversely affect the ability of
Clear Channel to complete the merger or delay or hinder the receipt of certain
regulatory approvals.
Furthermore, the merger agreement specifies that Jacor and its subsidiaries
will:
- use reasonable best efforts to preserve its business organization and
goodwill in all material respects, keep available the services of its
officers and employees as a group and maintain satisfactory relationships
with its customers, suppliers, distributors and others having business
relationships with it;
- notify Clear Channel of any emergency, other change in the normal course
of its business or in the operation of its properties, and any
complaints, investigations or hearings of any governmental body or
authority if this emergency, change, complaint, investigation or hearing
could have a material adverse effect on Jacor;
- not adopt any amendments to its corporate charter or bylaws or authorize
or pay any dividends or distributions on its outstanding shares of
capital stock;
- not enter into or amend any employment, severance or similar agreements
or arrangements with any directors or executive officers;
- except in the ordinary course of business and except for agreements for
stay bonuses, not enter into any new agreements with, or materially
increase the benefits of, any officers, directors or employees with
employment agreements that provide for an annual base salary in excess of
$150,000 and an employment term in excess of one year;
- not authorize, propose or enter into an agreement for a merger,
consolidation or business combination, an acquisition of a material
amount of assets or securities, a
70
<PAGE> 77
disposition of assets or securities, or a release of any material
contract rights not in the ordinary course of business, except for, so
long as Jacor's ability to perform its obligations under the merger
agreement would not be materially delayed or impaired, (A) as previously
disclosed in writing to Clear Channel and Sub and (B) acquisitions for
cash that relate to Jacor's existing business and in which the aggregate
consideration is less than specified thresholds;
- not issue any shares of its capital stock, except upon exercise of
rights, warrants or options issued pursuant to existing employee
incentive or benefit plans and non-employee director plans;
- not effect a stock split not previously announced;
- not otherwise change its capitalization as it existed on June 30, 1998;
- not grant any options, warrants, conversion rights or other rights to
acquire any shares of its capital stock, except for rights to participate
in its employee stock purchase plan and as otherwise consistent with past
practice, provided that Jacor will not acquire shares of Jacor common
stock except in connection with its 401(k) plan;
- except in the ordinary course of business in connection with employee
incentive and benefit plans that exist on the date of the merger
agreement, not purchase or redeem any shares of its stock;
- not amend in any significant respect the terms of their respective
employee benefit plans or any severance agreements or arrangements that
exist on the date of the merger agreement, or adopt any new employee
benefit plans, except (A) Jacor may amend any annual incentive plan that
exists on the date of the merger agreement to prorate performance bonuses
for the period ending on the closing date of the merger consistent with
the 1998 target for this annual incentive plan, and (B) in the ordinary
course of business, as required by law, as required to maintain tax-
qualified status, or as requested by the Internal Revenue Service to
receive a determination letter;
- not materially amend its revolving credit agreement or enter into any
loan agreement as borrower or, except as consistent with past practice,
as lender;
- except for contracts involving sports broadcast rights, not enter into
any material agreement with aggregate consideration of $2 million per
year;
- not enter into an agreement with any affiliate of Jacor, any family
member of any affiliate of Jacor or any Jacor stockholder who owns more
than 10% of the outstanding capital stock of Jacor;
- not make any material tax election or settle or compromise any material
tax liability, other than in connection with currently pending
proceedings or other than in the ordinary course of business;
- except as required by law and except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practices in all material respects, not enter into
or amend any material collective bargaining or other labor agreement; and
- not buy, sell or trade any Clear Channel equity security, including
entering into any put, call, option, swap, collar or other similar
derivative transaction.
71
<PAGE> 78
Further, under the merger agreement, Clear Channel will cause its merger
subsidiary to complete the merger on the terms and conditions set forth in the
merger agreement and will vote, and cause its merger subsidiary to vote, all
Jacor common stock, if any, beneficially owned in favor of the merger and the
merger agreement at the Jacor stockholders' meeting.
In addition, under the merger agreement, Clear Channel will not, and will
not permit any of its subsidiaries to:
- acquire assets or securities, or sell, lease, encumber or otherwise
dispose of assets or securities, or enter into any similar transaction
that may adversely affect Clear Channel's ability to consummate the
merger, materially delay any required governmental approvals, or
otherwise delay the consummation of the merger;
- except as required by the SEC or GAAP, change any of its accounting
principles or practices; or
- buy, sell or trade any Clear Channel equity security, including entering
into any put, call, option, swap, collar or other similar derivative
transaction.
Finally, under the merger agreement, each of Clear Channel and Jacor has
agreed that it will not take any action that would make any representation or
warranty of such party in the merger agreement untrue.
OTHER COVENANTS
Under the merger agreement, Clear Channel and Jacor agreed to the following
additional covenants:
STOCKHOLDERS' MEETINGS
Clear Channel and Jacor will each duly call, give notice of, and hold a
special meeting of its stockholders to approve their respective merger
proposals. Jacor and Clear Channel will use their reasonable efforts to cause
their stockholders' meetings to occur within 45 days after the effective date of
the registration statement relating to the Clear Channel common stock to be
issued in the merger.
ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CONFIDENTIALITY
Clear Channel and Jacor will each permit the other party, and that party's
officers, employees, accountants, legal counsel, financial advisors and other
representatives, to inspect all of its properties, books, contracts, commitments
and records. Also, Clear Channel and Jacor will provide to the other party:
copies of registration statements and other documents filed by it or its
subsidiaries pursuant to applicable federal or state securities laws and all
other information concerning its business, properties and personnel as the other
party may reasonably request. However, neither Clear Channel, Jacor nor any or
their subsidiaries will be required to disclose any information if doing so
would violate any law or affect either party's competitive position in its
markets or with respect to activities it engages in. Each party will keep the
information provided to it by the other party confidential in accordance with
the terms of the confidentiality agreements in effect between Clear Channel and
Jacor.
72
<PAGE> 79
FILINGS; OTHER ACTIONS
Before we can complete the merger, we must satisfy all regulatory
requirements and obtain the approval of all regulatory agencies having
jurisdiction over the merger. To facilitate the regulatory review and approval
process, we have each agreed to promptly make all necessary filings, seek all
required approvals of relevant regulatory agencies and use reasonable efforts to
take all actions necessary to complete the merger. Accordingly, we must make
filings and other required submissions under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and the
Communications Act. We will also make any other filings or submissions and seek
the approval of all other applicable regulatory agencies, including the FCC, the
FTC, the DOJ, state antitrust enforcement authorities, and other governmental
authorities under antitrust or competition laws. This includes our prompt
compliance with requests by these agencies for additional information or
documentation following our initial filings or submissions.
Furthermore, we will each make reasonable efforts to resolve objections to
the merger raised by regulatory agencies. Particularly, Clear Channel agreed to
take the following actions to the extent such actions will prevent governmental
agencies from creating obstacles to the merger or otherwise delaying the merger:
- offer to sell or otherwise dispose of assets, categories of assets or
businesses of Jacor or Clear Channel or their subsidiaries;
- terminate existing relationships and contractual rights and obligations;
and
- amend or terminate existing licenses or other intellectual property
agreements.
Clear Channel also agreed to take all steps necessary to resolve any
obstacles raised by a court entering a permanent or preliminary injunction or
other order that would prevent or delay the completion of the merger. However,
the merger agreement does not require either party to take any action for the
purpose of facilitating the merger if such action would have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated businesses, assets or operations of Clear Channel and
Jacor as a result of a material change to the Communications Act or FCC policy
in enforcing the Communications Act.
During the regulatory review process, each party will consult with the
other, permit the other to review all material communications with regulatory
agencies and will give the other the opportunity to participate in all
conferences and meetings with regulatory agencies.
NO SOLICITATION
Before the termination of the merger agreement, Jacor and its subsidiaries
will not solicit, initiate, or encourage any proposal for a merger,
consolidation, liquidation, reorganization, tender offer or other business
combination involving Jacor or any proposal to acquire at least 50% of the
voting securities of Jacor or all or substantially all of the assets of Jacor or
any of its subsidiaries. Furthermore, Jacor and its subsidiaries will not
otherwise discuss or facilitate any such proposal or disclose information in
response to such a proposal.
However, Jacor is not prohibited from furnishing information to, or
discussing or negotiating with, any person that makes an unsolicited acquisition
proposal that Jacor
73
<PAGE> 80
determines in good faith to be more favorable from a financial point of view to
the Jacor stockholders than the merger. Before furnishing information or
discussing or negotiating with that person, Jacor must give Clear Channel two
business days' advance written notice. Also, if Jacor receives any inquiries,
offers or proposals from any person with respect to an acquisition proposal,
then Jacor will notify Clear Channel of the inquiry, offer or proposal within 24
hours after Jacor receives it. In addition, Jacor will give Clear Channel five
business days advance notice of any agreement to be entered into with, or any
information to be supplied to, the person that made the inquiry, offer or
proposal.
The merger agreement does not prohibit Jacor from disclosing to Jacor
stockholders the statement required by Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act with
respect to an acquisition proposal by means of a tender offer.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
We are not obligated to complete the merger unless the following conditions
are satisfied or waived:
- the SEC declares Clear Channel's registration statement effective for the
registration of the Clear Channel common stock to be issued in the merger
and does not issue a stop order suspending effectiveness or initiated any
proceedings for that purpose;
- the requisite number of Jacor stockholders approve the merger agreement
and the merger;
- the requisite number of Clear Channel stockholders approve the issuance
of Clear Channel common stock to Jacor stockholders in the merger;
- the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act expires or is terminated;
- the parties obtain all consents and approvals necessary for the merger,
other than those that in the aggregate are not material;
- the parties obtain all required FCC orders and approvals;
- the NYSE, subject to official notice of listing, authorizes for listing
the Clear Channel common stock to be issued in the merger; and
- Jacor and Clear Channel each receive an opinion from its legal counsel
relating to certain tax matters.
Furthermore, neither Clear Channel and its merger subsidiary nor Jacor is
obligated to complete the merger unless the other party's representations and
warranties in the merger agreement are true and correct in all respects on the
effective date of the merger and the other party has materially performed all of
its material agreements and covenants required to be performed or complied with
before the effective time of the merger. However, exceptions to a party's
representations and warranties that, in the aggregate, would not materially and
adversely affect such party will not give the other party the right to prevent
the completion of the merger. A party may waive certain unsatisfied conditions
if such party is entitled to require the satisfaction of such condition before
the completion of the merger.
74
<PAGE> 81
THE EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON JACOR'S CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES
JACOR STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
Certain options and stock appreciation rights covering Jacor common stock
that are outstanding immediately before the effective time of the merger,
whether or not exercisable, will accelerate and become exercisable one day
before the effective time of the merger. These options and stock appreciation
rights are those that Jacor granted under the Jacor 1993 Stock Option Plan, the
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreements, the 1997 Long-Term Incentive
Plan, the 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan or a certain nonqualified stock
option.
Clear Channel will assume each Jacor option outstanding at the effective
time of the merger. As a result, each Jacor option will, at the effective time
of the merger, become an option to acquire shares of Clear Channel common stock.
These options will remain on the same terms and conditions as before the
effective time of the merger. The number of shares of Clear Channel common stock
covered by the option will be that number that the holder of the Jacor option
would have received in the merger if the holder had exercised the Jacor option
in full immediately before the effective time of the merger. Also, we will
adjust the exercise price of each Jacor option to equal the aggregate exercise
price to purchase the Jacor common stock covered by that Jacor option, divided
by the number of shares of Clear Channel common stock covered by that Jacor
option.
Clear Channel will also assume each Jacor stock appreciation right
outstanding at the effective time of the merger. As a result, each Jacor stock
appreciation right will, at the effective time of the merger, become a Clear
Channel stock appreciation right. These stock appreciation rights will remain on
the same terms and conditions as before the effective time of the merger. The
resulting Clear Channel stock appreciation right will cover that number of
shares of Clear Channel common stock equal to the number of shares subject to
the Jacor stock appreciation right immediately before the effective time of the
merger that the holder of the Jacor stock appreciation right would have been
entitled to receive in the merger. Also, we will adjust the exercise price of
each Jacor stock appreciation right to equal the aggregate exercise price for
the Jacor common stock subject to that Jacor stock appreciation right, divided
by the number of shares of Clear Channel common stock to which that Jacor stock
appreciation right relates.
Immediately after the effective time of the merger, each Jacor option and
Jacor stock appreciation right assumed by Clear Channel will become immediately
exercisable in full and will remain exercisable until their terms expire. Also,
Clear Channel will not issue any fractional shares upon the exercise of any
Jacor option or Jacor stock appreciation right. Instead, Clear Channel will pay
cash for these fractional shares based on the last sales price per share of
Clear Channel common stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the trading day
immediately preceding the exercise date.
RESERVATION AND REGISTRATION OF CLEAR CHANNEL SHARES
Clear Channel will reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of
Clear Channel common stock for delivery when assumed Jacor options are
exercised. Within three business days after the effective time of the merger,
Clear Channel will use its best efforts to register the Clear Channel common
stock subject to the assumed Jacor options pursuant to a registration statement
on Form S-8.
75
<PAGE> 82
JACOR STOCK UNITS
On or before the effective time of the merger, Jacor will transfer to each
participant in the Jacor Executive Stock Unit Plan and to each holder of a stock
unit under a Non-Employee Director Stock Unit Agreement a number of shares of
Jacor common stock equal to the number of stock units then credited to the
participant's or holder's stock unit account, less any shares withheld for tax
obligations required by law to be withheld. These shares of Jacor common stock
will convert into Clear Channel common stock pursuant to the merger agreement.
JACOR STOCK PURCHASE PLANS
Jacor will cause the ending date of the then current offering period under
the Jacor Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Purchase Plan to immediately follow the last anticipated payroll date before the
effective time of the merger. On such ending date, Jacor will use the funds
credited within each participant's withholding account to purchase whole shares
of Jacor common stock in accordance with the purchase plans. As soon as
practicable after the ending date, Jacor will refund to each participant any
cash balance remaining in the participant's account. Each share of Jacor common
stock so purchased will convert into Clear Channel common stock pursuant to the
merger agreement.
RIGHTS UNDER JACOR WARRANTS
Jacor issued warrants pursuant to the terms of its February 1996 agreement
to acquire Citicasters Inc. through a merger of a Jacor subsidiary with and into
Citicasters Inc. Such Citicasters warrants initially entitled the holders
thereof to purchase an aggregate of 4,400,000 shares of Jacor common stock. Each
Citicasters warrant currently entitles the holder thereof to purchase .2035247
of a share of Jacor common stock at a price of $28.00 per full share. The
holders of the Citicasters warrants may exercise such warrants until September
18, 2001.
Jacor also issued warrants pursuant to the terms of its October 1996 merger
agreement with Regent Communications, Inc., whereby Regent Communications, Inc.
merged with and into Jacor. Such Regent warrants initially entitled the holders
thereof to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of Jacor common stock. Each
Regent warrant currently entitles the holder thereof to purchase .11271 of a
share of Jacor common stock at a price of $40.00 per full share. The holders of
the Regent warrants may exercise such warrants until February 27, 2002, unless
Jacor calls a redemption of such warrants upon certain terms prior to that date.
Pursuant to the terms of the Citicasters warrants and the Regent warrants,
the merger will result in each holder of such warrants becoming entitled to
exercise such warrants for shares of Clear Channel common stock instead of Jacor
common stock. Upon the exercise of such warrants after the merger, the holders
of such warrants will receive that number of shares of Clear Channel common
stock that the holder would have received if he or she had exercised such
warrants for shares of Jacor common stock immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger, as adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio of the merger.
76
<PAGE> 83
RIGHTS UNDER JACOR LIQUID YIELD OPTION(TM) NOTES
In June 1996, Jacor issued and sold Liquid Yield Option(TM) Notes due June
12, 2011 in the aggregate principal amount at maturity of $259.9 million. Each
LYON due 2011 had an issue price of $443.14 and a principal amount at maturity
of $1,000. The holders thereof may, at their option, convert each LYON due 2011
into shares of Jacor common stock at a conversion rate of 13.412 shares per LYON
due 2011. Such conversion may occur at any time on or prior to the maturity of
the LYON due 2011, unless Jacor has previously redeemed or otherwise purchased
the LYON due 2011. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of certain events affecting Jacor common stock. The original issue
discount regarding the LYONs due 2011 represents a 5.50% yield per annum,
computed on a semiannual bond equivalent basis.
In February 1998, Jacor issued and sold Liquid Yield Option(TM) Notes due
February 9, 2018 in the aggregate principal amount at maturity of $426.9
million. Each LYON due 2018 had an issue price of $391.06 and a principal amount
at maturity of $1,000. The holders thereof may, at their option, convert each
LYON due 2018 into shares of Jacor common stock at a conversion rate of 6.245
shares per LYON due 2018. Such conversion may occur at any time on or prior to
the maturity of the LYON due 2018, unless Jacor has previously redeemed or
otherwise purchased the LYON due 2018. The conversion rate is subject to
adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events affecting Jacor common stock.
The original issue discount regarding the LYONs due 2018 represents a 4.75%
yield per annum, computed on a semiannual bond equivalent basis.
Pursuant to the terms of the LYONs due 2011 and the LYONs due 2018, the
merger will result in each holder of such LYONs becoming entitled to put the
LYONs to Jacor. The price that Clear Channel will pay for each LYON will be
equal to the issue price for each LYON plus accrued original discount to the
effective time of the merger or such later date set for the purchase of the
LYONs by Clear Channel. In the event that the holders of the LYONs elect not to
exercise such put rights in full, the holders of the remaining outstanding LYONs
will be entitled to convert such LYONs for shares of Clear Channel common stock
at a conversion rate adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio of the merger.
EMPLOYEE MATTERS
Clear Channel will cause the surviving corporation and its subsidiaries to
honor all existing employment, severance, consulting and salary continuation
agreements between Jacor or any of its subsidiaries and any current or former
officer, director, employee or consultant of Jacor or any of its subsidiaries.
Until December 31, 1999, Clear Channel will cause the surviving corporation
and its subsidiaries to provide all applicable Jacor employees the compensation,
benefits, programs, policies and arrangements that Jacor is providing to its
employees as of the effective time of the merger. Also, Clear Channel will not
merge Jacor's 401(k) plan into its 401(k) plan or merge its 401(k) plan into
Jacor's 401(k) plan until Clear Channel enters into an agreement with the
Internal Revenue Service that its 401(k) plan qualifies under Section 401(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code through the date of that agreement. Clear Channel will
give each employee of Jacor or its subsidiaries credit for all service to Jacor
or it subsidiaries under all employee benefit plans that the surviving
corporation maintains
77
<PAGE> 84
and in which these employees participate for purposes of eligibility, vesting
and benefit accrual.
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The merger agreement provides that all rights to indemnification and all
limitations on liability that exist for any officer, director or employee of
Jacor or any of its subsidiaries and that are provided in Jacor's charter,
bylaws or any agreement will survive the merger and continue in full force and
effect. To the extent permitted by Delaware law, the Jacor charter and bylaws,
or any indemnity agreement, advancement of expenses pursuant to their terms will
be mandatory rather than permissive, and the surviving corporation and Clear
Channel must advance costs in connection with such indemnification. Clear
Channel will cause the surviving corporation to honor the terms of all indemnity
agreements.
The merger agreement also provides that, for six years after the merger,
Clear Channel will, or will cause the surviving corporation to, maintain
officers' and directors' liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance
covering those officers, directors or employee's who are covered as of the date
of the merger agreement by Jacor's existing liability insurance policies. The
terms of the new insurance policies will be no less advantageous to such
officers, directors or employee's than the existing insurance policies. However,
if neither Clear Channel nor the surviving corporation can obtain coverage
equivalent to the existing insurance policies at an annual premium equal to or
less than a specified ceiling, then Clear Channel or the surviving corporation
will maintain policies that in Clear Channel's good faith judgment provide
maximum coverage at an annual premium equal to the specified ceiling.
The merger agreement also requires that for a period of six years after the
merger, Clear Channel and the surviving corporation will indemnify Jacor's
former directors and officers for losses, claims, damages and certain other
expenses relating to their service as officers, directors or employees of Jacor
on or before the effective time of the merger. Clear Channel and the surviving
corporation will make advances to such directors and officers for all expenses
incurred in connection with any such indemnifiable claim. Unless otherwise
provided in any indemnity agreement, Clear Channel or the surviving corporation
may require an indemnitee to provide an undertaking to repay any expense
advances if a court ultimately determines that this indemnitee is not entitled
to indemnification from Clear Channel or the surviving corporation.
The merger agreement also provides that if any such officer, director or
employee asserts an indemnifiable claim within such six year period, such
person's rights to indemnification and advancement of expenses related to such
claim will continue until such claim is disposed of or all judgments, orders,
decrees or other rulings in connection with such claim are fully satisfied.
Clear Channel will not be liable for any settlement effected without its written
consent, and Clear Channel will not unreasonably withhold or delay its consent.
In addition, except as otherwise provided pursuant to any indemnity agreement,
any indemnitees as a group may retain only one law firm with respect to each
related claim except to the extent there is, in the opinion of counsel to such
an indemnitee, under applicable standards of professional conduct, a conflict on
any significant issue between positions of any two or more indemnitees.
78
<PAGE> 85
The obligations of Clear Channel, Jacor and the surviving corporation are
binding on all their successors and assigns and survive the completion of the
merger.
TERMINATION
The parties may terminate the merger agreement at any time before the
effective time of the merger as follows:
- by mutual written consent of Clear Channel and Jacor;
- unless Clear Channel is in material breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or agreement in the merger agreement, by Clear Channel
if Jacor breaches any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements in the merger agreement or if any representation or warranty
of Jacor becomes untrue, and such breach or untruth continues for ten
days following notice to Jacor of such breach or untruth, and the nature
of such breach or untruth is such that certain conditions to Clear
Channel's obligations to consummate the merger would be incapable of
being satisfied by October 8, 1999. A willful breach by Jacor will cause
such conditions to be incapable of being satisfied by October 8, 1999;
- unless Jacor is in material breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement in the merger agreement, by Jacor if Clear Channel
breaches any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
in the merger agreement or if any representation or warranty of Clear
Channel becomes untrue, and such breach or untruth continues for ten days
following notice to Clear Channel of such breach or untruth, and the
nature of such breach or untruth is such that certain conditions to
Jacor's obligations to consummate the merger would be incapable of being
satisfied by October 8, 1999. A willful breach by Clear Channel will
cause such conditions to be incapable of being satisfied by October 8,
1999;
- by either Clear Channel or Jacor if any governmental entity shall have
issued an order, decree or ruling, or taken any other action, permanently
enjoining, restraining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the
merger, and this order, decree, ruling or other action shall have become
final and nonappealable;
- by either Clear Channel or Jacor if the merger does not occur by October
8, 1999, unless the merger does not occur due to a breach of a covenant,
or a material breach of a representation or warranty, in the merger
agreement by the party seeking to terminate;
- by either Clear Channel or Jacor if the Jacor stockholders fail to
approve the Jacor merger proposal, as long as Jacor is not in material
breach under the merger agreement;
- by either Clear Channel or Jacor if the Clear Channel stockholders fail
to approve the Clear Channel merger proposal, as long as Clear Channel is
not in material breach under the merger agreement;
- by Jacor, if before the Jacor stockholders' meeting, a third party
presents an acquisition proposal to Jacor which Jacor determines in good
faith to be more favorable from a financial point of view to the Jacor
stockholders than the merger with Clear Channel. However, before Jacor
may terminate the merger agreement, it must give Clear Channel notice of
the proposed termination and the opportunity for Clear Channel to amend
the merger agreement to make it substantially similar to
79
<PAGE> 86
the third party proposal. Jacor may terminate the merger agreement if
Clear Channel and Jacor do not reach an agreement to amend the merger
agreement within five days following Clear Channel's receipt of Jacor's
termination notice;
- by Clear Channel if the Jacor board (A) withdraws or modifies adversely
its recommendation of the merger, (B) recommends an alternative
acquisition proposal to Jacor stockholders, or (C) fails to call or hold
the Jacor stockholders' meeting because Jacor received an alternative
acquisition proposal;
- by Jacor by notice delivered to Clear Channel on one of the two trading
days prior to the completion of the merger if the average closing price
of Clear Channel common stock as reported on the NYSE during the 25
consecutive trading days ending two trading days before completion of the
merger is less than or equal to $37.50; and
- by Jacor if, for a 25 consecutive trading day period beginning after the
date the parties signed the merger agreement and ending within five
trading days of Jacor's notice of termination to Clear Channel, the
average of the closing prices of Clear Channel common stock for that 25
day period, as reported on the NYSE, is less than or equal to $37.50.
The party desiring to terminate the merger agreement must give written
notice of such termination to the other party.
FEES AND EXPENSES
Except as described in "Terms of the Merger Agreement -- Termination Fee"
below, the party incurring costs and expenses will pay all such costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
TERMINATION FEE
Jacor must pay Clear Channel $115 million as a result of the termination of
the merger agreement under any of the following circumstances:
- Jacor terminated the merger agreement because it received an alternative
acquisition proposal which it determined to be financially superior for
the Jacor stockholders and it did not reach agreement with Clear Channel
to amend the merger agreement so as to make it substantially similar to
the alternative proposal;
- Clear Channel terminated the merger agreement because Jacor's board
withdrew or adversely modified its recommendation to its stockholders;
- An alternative acquisition proposal was made before the Jacor
stockholders' meeting and the Jacor stockholders do not approve the Jacor
merger proposal. Jacor must pay the $115 million termination fee if
within six months after the termination of the merger agreement Jacor
enters into an agreement with the third party presenting the alternative
acquisition proposal and completes an acquisition with such third party
within 18 months after the termination of the merger agreement on
substantially the same terms as presented in the alternative acquisition
proposal.
80
<PAGE> 87
AMENDMENT
Jacor and Clear Channel may amend or supplement the merger agreement in
writing at any time, except that following approval by the Jacor stockholders
and Clear Channel stockholders, there may be no amendment to the merger
agreement that by law requires further approval by the Jacor stockholders and
Clear Channel stockholders unless Jacor or Clear Channel, as applicable, first
obtains such approval.
WAIVER
The merger agreement permits Jacor, Clear Channel and Clear Channel's
merger subsidiary at any time before the effective time of the merger to:
- extend the time to perform any of the obligations or other acts of the
other parties;
- waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained in
the merger agreement or in any document delivered pursuant to the merger
agreement; and
- waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions of the other
party contained in the merger agreement unless, if such party waives
compliance after approval by the Jacor stockholders and the Clear Channel
stockholders, as applicable, and such waiver would require approval by
the Jacor stockholders, or the Clear Channel stockholders, as applicable,
such party first obtains such approval, in each case pursuant to a
written instrument.
The failure of any party to the merger agreement to assert any of its
rights thereunder or otherwise will not constitute a waiver of those rights.
81
<PAGE> 88
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements
give effect to the merger. For accounting purposes Clear Channel will account
for the merger as a purchase of Jacor; accordingly the net assets of Jacor have
been adjusted to their estimated fair values based upon a preliminary purchase
price allocation.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of operations for the
year ended December 31, 1997 and the nine months ended September 30, 1998 give
effect to the merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 1997 and January 1,
1998, respectively. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance sheet at
September 30, 1998 gives effect to the merger as if it occurred on September 30,
1998.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 1997 was prepared based upon the historical statement of
operations of Clear Channel, adjusted to reflect the acquisitions of 93% of the
outstanding capital stock of Eller, the radio assets and certain outdoor
advertising assets of Paxson, all of the outstanding capital stock of More and
the merger with Universal, as if such acquisitions and merger had occurred on
January 1, 1997 ("1997 Clear Channel Pro Forma"), and based upon the historical
statement of operations of Jacor adjusted to reflect the acquisition of the
assets of 17 radio stations from Nationwide, The EFM Companies, and Premiere, as
if such acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 1997 ("1997 Jacor Pro Forma").
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 1998 was prepared based upon the historical statement
of operations of Clear Channel, adjusted to reflect the merger with Universal
and the acquisition of More as if such merger and acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 1998 ("1998 Clear Channel Pro Forma"), and based upon the historical
statement of operations of Jacor adjusted to reflect the acquisition of the
assets of 17 radio stations from Nationwide as if such acquisition had occurred
on January 1, 1998 ("1998 Jacor Pro Forma"). The unaudited pro forma combined
condensed balance sheet was prepared based upon the historical balance sheet of
Clear Channel and the historical balance sheet of Jacor. Certain amounts in
Jacor's financial statements have been reclassified to conform to Clear
Channel's presentation.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the historical financial statements of Jacor and Clear
Channel incorporated herein by reference.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements are not
necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations or financial position
that would have occurred had the merger and the above described acquisitions and
merger transactions of Clear Channel and Jacor occurred on the dates indicated
nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial
position.
82
<PAGE> 89
CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLEAR CHANNEL
PRO FORMA AND JACOR
CLEAR CHANNEL JACOR MERGER PRO FORMA
HISTORICAL HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENT MERGER
------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.................... $ 48,192 $ 42,084 $ (50,000) $ 40,276
Accounts receivable, net..................... 287,067 198,327 -- 485,394
Other current assets......................... 65,603 29,385 -- 94,988
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Total Current Assets................... 400,862 269,796 (50,000) 620,658
Property, plant & equipment, net............... 1,713,449 260,212 -- 1,973,661
Intangible assets:
Contract valuations.......................... 275,211 360,000 -- 635,211
Licenses and goodwill........................ 4,362,111 2,508,450 1,613,629 8,484,190
Other intangible assets...................... 74,552 -- -- 74,552
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
4,711,874 2,868,450 1,613,629 9,193,953
Less accumulated amortization.................. (254,869) (156,159) 156,159 (254,869)
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
4,457,005 2,712,291 1,769,788 8,939,084
Other assets:
Notes receivable............................. 53,675 -- -- 53,675
Investments in and advances to,
nonconsolidated affiliates................. 346,215 -- -- 346,215
Other assets................................. 41,189 85,369 -- 126,558
Other investments............................ 248,890 -- -- 248,890
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
TOTAL ASSETS........................... $7,261,285 $3,327,668 $1,719,788 $12,308,741
========== ========== ========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
current liabilities........................ $ 238,166 $ 137,958 $ -- $ 376,124
Current portion of long-term debt............ 4,049 -- -- 4,049
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Total Current Liabilities.............. 242,215 137,958 -- 380,173
Long-term debt................................. 2,980,849 1,229,565 -- 4,210,414
Deferred income taxes.......................... 163,104 358,995 -- 522,099
Other long-term liabilities.................... 92,913 119,717 -- 212,630
Liquid yield options notes..................... -- 302,400 53,630 356,030
Minority interest.............................. 18,502 -- -- 18,502
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock.............................. -- -- -- --
Common stock................................. 24,856 511 6,639 32,006
Additional paid-in capital................... 3,322,268 1,114,520 1,680,950 6,117,738
Common stock warrants........................ -- 31,500 11,071 42,571
Retained earnings............................ 214,621 19,871 (19,871) 214,621
Other........................................ 49,288 -- -- 49,288
Unrealized gain on investments............... 154,642 12,631 (12,631) 154,642
Cost of shares held in treasury.............. (1,973) -- -- (1,973)
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Total Shareholders' Equity............. 3,763,702 1,179,033 1,666,158 6,608,893
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY............................... $7,261,285 $3,327,668 $1,719,788 $12,308,741
========== ========== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
83
<PAGE> 90
CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLEAR CHANNEL
1997 1997 PRO FORMA AND JACOR
CLEAR CHANNEL JACOR MERGER PRO FORMA
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENT MERGER
------------- --------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue.......................... $1,273,983 $650,844 $ -- $1,924,827
Operating expenses................... 749,796 445,726 -- 1,195,522
Depreciation and amortization........ 289,689 102,887 82,765 475,341
Corporate expenses................... 34,734 17,716 -- 52,450
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Operating income (loss).............. 199,764 84,515 (82,765) 260,514
Interest expense..................... 218,437 117,710 -- 336,147
Other income (expense) -- net........ 187 12,060 -- 12,247
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before income taxes.... (18,486) (21,135) (82,765) (122,386)
Income tax (expense) benefit......... (24,167) 4,526 -- (19,644)
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before equity in
earnings of nonconsolidated
affiliates......................... (42,653) (16,612) (82,765) (142,030)
Equity in earnings (loss) of
nonconsolidated affiliates......... 6,029 -- -- 6,029
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Net income (loss) before
extraordinary items................ $ (36,624) $(16,612) $(82,765) $ (136,001)
========== ======== ======== ==========
Net income (loss) before
extraordinary items per common
share:
Basic.............................. $ (.17) $ (.47)
========== ==========
Diluted............................ $ (.18) $ (.47)
========== ==========
</TABLE>
84
<PAGE> 91
CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLEAR CHANNEL
1998 1998 PRO FORMA AND JACOR
CLEAR CHANNEL JACOR MERGER PRO FORMA
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENT MERGER
------------- --------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue....................... $1,109,521 $589,184 $ -- $1,698,705
Operating expenses................ 659,215 398,310 -- 1,057,525
Depreciation and amortization..... 251,923 97,352 46,915 396,190
Corporate expenses................ 32,864 14,458 -- 47,322
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Operating income (loss)........... 165,519 79,064 (46,915) 197,668
Interest expense.................. 133,781 80,470 -- 214,251
Other income (expense) -- net..... 3,817 10,728 -- 14,545
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before income
taxes........................... 35,555 9,322 (46,915) (2,038)
Income tax (expense) benefit...... (45,339) (15,375) -- (60,714)
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before equity in
earnings of nonconsolidated
affiliates...................... (9,784) (6,053) (46,915) (62,752)
Equity in earnings (loss) of
nonconsolidated affiliates...... 9,692 -- -- 9,692
---------- -------- -------- ----------
Net income (loss) before
extraordinary items............. $ (92) $ (6,053) $(46,915) $ (53,060)
========== ======== ======== ==========
Net income (loss) before
extraordinary items per common
share:
Basic........................... $ (.00) $ (.17)
========== ==========
Diluted......................... $ (.00) $ (.17)
========== ==========
</TABLE>
85
<PAGE> 92
CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
Clear Channel and Jacor unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial
statements reflect the merger, accounted for as a purchase, as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Jacor common stock outstanding (in whole shares)............ 51,073,198
Exchange ratio (based on the estimated value per share of
$38.7054)................................................. 1.40
-------------
Clear Channel's common stock to be issued in the merger (in
whole shares)............................................. 71,502,477
Estimated value per share................................... X $ 38.7054
-------------
$ 2,767,532
Estimated value of common stock options..................... 35,088
Estimated transaction costs................................. 50,000
-------------
Total estimated purchase price.................... $ 2,852,620
=============
</TABLE>
For purpose of these statements the total estimated purchase price was
allocated as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Total estimated purchase price.............................. $ 2,852,620
Plus -- estimated fair value of LYONs notes in excess of
carrying value............................................ 53,630
Plus -- estimated fair value of Jacor common stock warrants
in excess of carrying value............................... 11,071
Less -- Jacor's net assets exchanged in the merger at
September 30, 1998 adjusted for the elimination of
existing net licenses and goodwill of $2,352,291.......... (1,204,758)
-----------
Estimated excess purchase price (allocated to licenses and
goodwill)................................................. $ 4,122,079
===========
</TABLE>
The estimated excess purchase price allocated to licenses and goodwill of
$4,122,079 will be amortized over a 25 year period using the straight line
method which will result in annual goodwill amortization of $164,883.
This pro forma is based on the maximum exchange ratio of 1.4 shares of
Clear Channel common shares per each share of Jacor common shares. As the
exchange ratio is variable, based on the moving average market price of Clear
Channel's common stock, the following analysis gives effect to a range of
possible pro forma results for selected items based on market prices varying
from $45.00 to $60.00 per share.
86
<PAGE> 93
CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARES
COMMON SHARE ------------------
TOTAL ASSETS NET LOSS BASIC & DILUTED BASIC DILUTED
------------ --------- --------------- ------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
At and for the year ended December 31, 1997
Price of Clear Channel Stock:
$45.00 n/a(1) $(138,433) $(0.48) 286,034 295,009
========= ====== ======= =======
$50.00 n/a(1) $(152,223) $(0.53) 286,034 295,009
========= ====== ======= =======
$55.00 n/a(1) $(158,981) $(0.56) 282,900 291,770
========= ====== ======= =======
$60.00 n/a(1) $(165,763) $(0.59) 280,288 289,071
========= ====== ======= =======
At and for the nine months ended September 30, 1998
Price of Clear Channel Stock:
$45.00 $12,641,133 $ (58,368) $(0.19) 312,088 330,232
=========== ========= ====== ======= =======
$50.00 $12,985,877 $ (68,710) $(0.22) 312,088 330,232
=========== ========= ====== ======= =======
$55.00 $13,154,844 $ (73,779) $(0.24) 308,954 326,839
=========== ========= ====== ======= =======
$60.00 $13,324,380 $ (78,866) $(0.26) 306,342 324,012
=========== ========= ====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) This information is not presented since a pro forma balance sheet of
December 31, 1997 is not required.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance sheet is based on the
assumption that Jacor's debt holders will accept the transfer of debt to Clear
Channel. However, Clear Channel must offer to purchase all outstanding senior
subordinated notes at 101% of the principal amount. Clear Channel must also
offer to purchase all liquid yield option notes at their accreted value of
$302,400 million. It is unlikely that the debt holders will accept Clear
Channel's offer, as the fair value of this debt is greater than the required
offer. If all of Jacor's debt holders would accept Clear Channel's offer, the
pro forma total debt balance would decrease by $48.2 million.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements of
operations excludes the effect of any divestiture of stations, which may be
required for regulatory approval, as Clear Channel intends the funds received
from any divestiture to be reinvested in acquisitions of similar stations in
other markets. Neither Clear Channel nor Jacor anticipates that any required
divestitures will be significant. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed
financial statements of operations also excludes the effect of retired or
refinanced debt as any retirement or refinancing of debt will not occur at or
prior to the closing of the merger.
These pro forma statements are contingent on the approval of the merger by
the stockholders of Clear Channel and Jacor. If the merger agreement is
terminated under certain circumstances, Jacor must pay Clear Channel a fee of
$115 million as a result of such termination. Also, see "Terms of the Merger
Agreement -- Termination Fee" for related matters in the event this merger is
terminated.
87
<PAGE> 94
CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
The pro forma merger adjustments at September 30, 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
----------
<S> <C> <C>
(a) Decrease in cash and cash equivalents resulting from
estimated merger expenses................................. $ (50,000)
(b) Increase in goodwill and licenses equal to the excess
purchase price of the merger.............................. 1,613,629
(c) Decrease in accumulated amortization resulting from the
elimination of Jacor's existing accumulated amortization
on goodwill............................................... 156,159
(d) Record liquid yield option notes at estimated fair value.... 53,630
(e) Increase common stock to account for Clear Channel common
stock given in the merger at $0.10 par value.............. 6,639
(f) Increase additional paid-in capital to account for Clear
Channel common stock given in the merger at $38.7054 per
share less $0.10 par value ($1,645,862) plus the value of
Jacor stock options included in the Merger ($35,088)...... 1,680,950
(g) Record common stock warrants at estimated fair value........ 11,071
(h) Eliminate Jacor's existing retained earnings balance........ (19,871)
(i) Eliminate Jacor's existing unrealized gain on investments
balance................................................... (12,631)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE (DECREASE)
TO INCOME
-------------------
12/31/97 9/30/98
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(j) Increase in amortization expense resulting from the
additional goodwill created by the merger and a
change in the life of goodwill amortization from 40
years (Jacor's policy) to 25 years (Clear Channel's
policy). This amortization expense results in a
permanent difference and will not be deductible for
federal income tax purposes........................ $(82,765) $(46,915)
</TABLE>
88
<PAGE> 95
CLEAR CHANNEL AND JACOR
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
Pro forma basic and diluted share information is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
12/31/97 9/30/98
-------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Basic
Clear Channel pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding............................................... 218,810 244,079
Jacor pro forma weighted average shares outstanding......... 49,348 50,133
Increase weighted average common stock outstanding to
account for Clear Channel's common stock given in the
merger at the exchange ratio of 1.40, (51,073 X .40)...... 20,429 20,429
------- -------
Clear Channel and Jacor Pro Forma Merger.................... 288,587 314,641
======= =======
Diluted
Clear Channel pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding............................................... 225,486 256,534
Jacor pro forma weighted average shares outstanding......... 51,051 54,347
Increase weighted average common stock outstanding to
account for Clear Channel common stock given in the merger
and to account for the dilution effect Jacor's common
stock warrants, employee stock options and other dilutive
shares have on the Company at the exchange ratio of 1.40,
(52,776 X .40) and (55,287 X .40), respectively........... 21,110 22,115
------- -------
Clear Channel and Jacor Pro Forma Merger.................... 297,647 332,996
======= =======
</TABLE>
89
<PAGE> 96
CLEAR CHANNEL
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLEAR CHANNEL ELLER PRO FORMA PAXSON PRO FORMA UNIVERSAL
HISTORICAL HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENT(1) HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENT(2) HISTORICAL
------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue.................... $697,068 $56,642 $ -- $78,104 $ -- $209,639
Operating expenses............. 394,404 33,804 -- 63,362 (1,246) 101,613
Depreciation and
amortization.................. 114,207 10,547 5,974 12,101 9,377 59,977
Noncash compensation expense... -- -- -- -- -- 8,289
Corporate expenses............. 20,883 2,318 -- 4,059 -- --
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss)........ 167,574 9,973 (5,974) (1,418) (8,131) 39,760
Interest expense............... 75,076 8,565 2,518 1,370 29,276 46,400
Other income
(expense) -- net.............. 11,579 (4,082) -- (1,034) -- (2,621)
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income
taxes......................... 104,077 (2,674) (8,492) (3,822) (37,407) (9,261)
Income tax (expense) benefit... (47,116) (3) 1,315 -- 14,963 --
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before equity in
earnings of nonconsolidated
affiliates.................... 56,961 (2,677) (7,177) (3,822) (22,444) (9,261)
Equity in earnings (loss) of
non-consolidated affiliates... 6,615 -- -- -- -- --
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Net income (loss).............. $ 63,576 $(2,677) $(7,177) $(3,822) $(22,444) $ (9,261)
======== ======= ======= ======= ======== ========
Net income (loss) per common
share:
Basic......................... $ .36
========
Diluted....................... $ .34
========
<CAPTION>
1997
PRO FORMA MORE PRO FORMA CLEAR CHANNEL
ADJUSTMENT(3) HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENT(4) PRO FORMA
------------- ---------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue.................... $ -- $232,530 $ -- $1,273,983
Operating expenses............. -- 157,859 -- 749,796
Depreciation and
amortization.................. 30,881 23,592 23,033 289,689
Noncash compensation expense... (8,289) 1,327 (1,327) --
Corporate expenses............. -- 7,474 -- 34,734
-------- -------- -------- ----------
Operating income (loss)........ (22,592) 42,278 (21,706) 199,764
Interest expense............... -- 4,383 50,849 218,437
Other income
(expense) -- net.............. -- (3,655) -- 187
-------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before income
taxes......................... (22,592) 34,240 (72,555) (18,486)
Income tax (expense) benefit... -- (10,705) 17,379 (24,167)
-------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before equity in
earnings of nonconsolidated
affiliates.................... (22,592) 23,535 (55,176) (42,653)
Equity in earnings (loss) of
non-consolidated affiliates... -- (586) -- 6,029
-------- -------- -------- ----------
Net income (loss).............. $(22,592) $ 22,949 $(55,176) (36,624)
======== ======== ======== ==========
Net income (loss) per common
share:
Basic......................... $ (.17)
==========
Diluted....................... $ (.18)
==========
</TABLE>
90
<PAGE> 97
CLEAR CHANNEL
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998
CLEAR CLEAR
CHANNEL UNIVERSAL PRO FORMA MORE PRO FORMA CHANNEL
HISTORICAL HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENT(5) HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENT(6) PRO FORMA
---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue......................... $909,555 $55,292 $ -- $144,674 $ -- $1,109,521
Operating expenses.................. 517,562 30,826 -- 110,827 -- 659,215
Depreciation and amortization....... 201,422 15,517 7,720 15,699 11,565 251,923
Noncash compensation expense........ -- 106 (106) 3,476 (3,476) --
Corporate expenses.................. 25,739 1,414 -- 5,711 -- 32,864
-------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ----------
Operating income (loss)............. 164,832 7,429 (7,614) 8,961 (8,089) 165,519
Interest expense.................... 94,555 13,159 -- 3,715 22,352 133,781
Other income (expense) -- net....... 13,416 (23) -- (9,576) -- 3,817
-------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before income taxes... 83,693 (5,753) (7,614) (4,330) (30,441) 35,555
Income tax (expense) benefit........ (48,766) -- -- (3,301) 6,728 (45,339)
-------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ----------
Income (loss) before equity in
earnings of nonconsolidated
affiliates........................ 34,927 (5,753) (7,614) (7,631) (23,713) (9,784)
Equity in earnings (loss) of non-
consolidated affiliates........... 10,063 -- -- (371) -- 9,692
-------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ----------
Net income (loss)................... $ 44,990 $(5,753) $(7,614) $ (8,002) $(23,713) $ (92)
======== ======= ======= ======== ======== ==========
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic............................. $ .19 $ (.00)
======== ==========
Diluted........................... $ .19 $ (.00)
======== ==========
</TABLE>
91
<PAGE> 98
CLEAR CHANNEL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
ELLER ACQUISITION
(1) Represents the pro forma effect of the acquisition of Eller assuming it
was acquired January 1, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE(DECREASE)
IN INCOME
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(a) Increase in amortization of goodwill of $5,205 resulting
from the additional goodwill created by the
acquisition and a decrease in amortizable life from 40
years (Eller) to 25 years (Clear Channel) and
additional depreciation of $769 related to the
adjustment of fixed assets to fair value. ............ $(5,974)
(b) Increase in interest expense due to a higher amount of
average debt outstanding, which was partially offset
by a lower average interest rate (6% average rate for
Clear Channel and 8.8% for Eller during the first
three months of 1997). ............................... (2,518)
(c) Tax effect of the above adjustments to depreciation and
interest expense at Clear Channel's effective federal
and state tax rate of 40%. ........................... 1,315
</TABLE>
PAXSON ACQUISITION
(2) Represents the pro forma effect of the Paxson acquisition assuming it
was acquired January 1, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE(DECREASE)
IN INCOME
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(d) Elimination of option plan compensation expense
resulting from the elimination of the plan............ $ 1,246
(e) Increase in amortization expense resulting from the
additional goodwill created by the acquisition........ (9,377)
(f) Increase in interest expense (at an average interest
rate of 6.5% for the first nine months of 1997) due to
additional borrowing on Clear Channel's facility to
finance the acquisition cost.......................... (29,276)
(g) Tax effect of the above adjustment at Clear Channel's
effective federal and state tax rate of 40%. ......... 13,339
(h) This pro forma does not include certain benefits Clear
Channel believes it achieved through the
discontinuance of a corporate headquarters operating
solely for the Paxson radio stations. Paxson's
historical statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 1997 includes $4,059, $2,435 net of
taxes, of expenses as the allocation of corporate
expense. Clear Channel has not incurred these expenses
relating to the Paxson radio stations since the
completion of this acquisition in December 1997.
</TABLE>
92
<PAGE> 99
CLEAR CHANNEL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
UNIVERSAL MERGER
(3) The pro forma merger adjustments for the year ended December 31, 1997
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
IN INCOME
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(i) Increase in amortization expense resulting from the
additional goodwill created by the merger............. $(30,881)
(j) Decrease in noncash compensation to reverse the effect
of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
123 ("FAS 123") from the statement of operations as
Clear Channel elected to follow Accounting Principles
Board Opinion Number 25 ("APB 25") for earnings
presentation and implemented FAS 123 for footnote
disclosure only....................................... 8,289
</TABLE>
MORE ACQUISITION
(4) More is headquartered in London. Accordingly, More's financial
statements are reported in British Pounds. The statement of operations
was translated into US Dollars using the average exchange rate for the
period and the balance sheet was translated into US Dollars using the
exchange rate at the end of the period. The pro forma adjustments for
the year ended December 31, 1997 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
IN INCOME
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(k) Increase in amortization expense resulting from the
additional goodwill created by the acquisition. ...... $(23,033)
(l) Decrease in noncash compensation to reverse the effect
of FAS 123 from the statement of operations as Clear
Channel elected to follow APB 25 for earnings
presentation and implemented FAS 123 for footnote
disclosure only. ..................................... 1,327
(m) Increase in interest expense due to financing the
acquisition price of More at Clear Channel's average
interest rate of 6.62% for 1997. ..................... (50,849)
(n) The tax effect of adjustment (l) at the 1997 UK
statutory rate of 31.5% offset by the tax benefit of
adjustment (m) at Clear Channel's federal U.S. tax
rate in 1997 of 35%. ................................. 17,379
</TABLE>
93
<PAGE> 100
CLEAR CHANNEL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
UNIVERSAL MERGER
(5) The pro forma merger adjustments for the nine months ended September
30, 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
IN INCOME
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(o) Increase in amortization expense resulting from the
additional goodwill created by the merger. ........... $(7,720)
(p) Decrease in Noncash compensation to reverse the effect
of FAS 123 from the statement of operations as the
Company elected to follow APB 25 for earnings
presentation and implemented FAS 123 for footnote
disclosure only. ..................................... 106
</TABLE>
MORE ACQUISITION
(6) More is headquartered in London. Accordingly, More's financial
statements are reported in British Pounds. The statement of operations
was translated into US Dollars using the average exchange rate for the
period and the balance sheet was translated into US Dollars using the
exchange rate at the end of the period. The pro forma adjustments for
the nine months ended September 30, 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
IN INCOME
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(q) Increase in amortization expense resulting from the
additional goodwill created by the acquisition. ...... $(11,565)
(r) Decrease in noncash compensation to reverse the effect
of FAS 123 from the statement of operations as Clear
Channel elected to follow APB 25 for earnings
presentation and implemented FAS 123 for footnote
disclosure only. ..................................... 3,476
(s) Increase in interest expense due to financing the
acquisition price of More at Clear Channel's average
interest rate of 6.62% for 1997. ..................... (22,352)
(t) The tax effect of adjustment (r) at the 1998 UK
statutory rate of 31.5% offset by the tax benefit of
adjustment (s) at Clear Channel's federal U.S. tax
rate in 1998 of 35%. ................................. 6,728
</TABLE>
94
<PAGE> 101
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OTHER
ACQUISITIONS NATIONWIDE ACQUISITION 1997
JACOR PRO FORMA HISTORICAL PRO FORMA PRO FORMA JACOR
HISTORICAL ADJUSTMENTS NATIONWIDE ADJUSTMENTS ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA
---------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue.................................. $530,574 $25,321(a) $ 97,997 $ 565(e) $ (3,613)(h) $ 650,844
Broadcast operating expenses................. 356,783 16,760(a) 81,958 723(e) (10,498)(h)(n) 445,726
Depreciation and amortization................ 78,485 8,182(a) 10,129 2,084(e) 4,007(i) 102,887
Corporate general and administrative
expenses................................... 14,093 -- 3,623 -- --(n) 17,716
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Operating income (loss)...................... 81,213 379 2,287 (2,242) 2,878 84,515
Interest expense, net........................ 80,008 9,303(b) 4,616 3,197(e) 20,586(j) 117,710
Gain on sale of radio stations............... 11,135 -- 44,132 (44,132)(f) -- 11,135
Other income (expense), net.................. 664 298(c) (37) -- -- 925
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes and
extraordinary
items...................................... 13,004 (8,626) 41,766 (49,571) (17,708) (21,135)
Income tax (expense) credit.................. (9,600) 4,358(d) (14,310) 16,992(g) 7,083(k) 4,523
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ---------
Income (loss) before extraordinary items..... $ 3,404 $(4,268) $ 27,456 $(32,579) $(10,625) $ (16,612)
======== ======= ======== ======== ======== =========
Income (loss) per common share:
Basic...................................... $ .08 $ (.33)
======== =========
Diluted.................................... $ .08 $ (.33)
======== =========
</TABLE>
95
<PAGE> 102
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HISTORICAL
NATIONWIDE
SIX MONTHS NATIONWIDE ACQUISITION 1998
JACOR ENDED PRO FORMA PRO FORMA JACOR
HISTORICAL JUNE 30, 1998 ADJUSTMENTS ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA
---------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue................ $530,372 $50,171 $ -- $ 8,641(l) $589,184
Broadcast operating
expenses................. 356,877 39,623 (738)(e) 2,548(l)(n) 398,310
Depreciation and
amortization............. 87,444 5,044 299(e) 4,565(i) 97,352
Corporate general and
administrative
expenses................. 13,052 1,406 -- --(n) 14,458
-------- ------- ----- -------- --------
Operating income (loss).... 72,999 4,098 439 1,528 79,064
Interest expense, net...... 65,968 (452) -- 14,954(j) 80,470
Gain on sale of radio
stations................. 10,896 -- -- -- 10,896
Other income (expense),
net...................... (164) (4) -- -- (168)
-------- ------- ----- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income
taxes and extraordinary
items.................... 17,763 4,546 439 (13,426) 9,322
Income tax (expense)
credit................... (19,200) (1,546) -- 5,371(k) (15,375)
-------- ------- ----- -------- --------
Income (loss) before
extraordinary items...... $ (1,437) $ 3,000 $ 439 $ (8,055) $ (6,053)
======== ======= ===== ======== ========
Income (loss) per common
share:
Basic.................... $ (.03) $ (.12)(m)
======== ========
Diluted.................. $ (.03) $ (.12)(m)
======== ========
</TABLE>
96
<PAGE> 103
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(a) These adjustments for the following acquisitions reflect additional
revenues and expenses for the period January 1, 1997 to the acquisition
consummation date. Depreciation and amortization expense adjustments
reflect Jacor's purchase cost of the assets acquired.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997
----------------------------------
BROADCAST DEPRECIATION
NET OPERATING AND
REVENUE EXPENSES AMORTIZATION
------- --------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Premiere Radio Networks, Inc. (completed June
1997)........................................ $14,130 $ 9,276 $4,348
EFM Companies (completed April 1997)........... 11,191 7,484 3,834
------- ------- ------
TOTAL................................ $25,321 $16,760 $8,182
======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
(b) The adjustment represents additional interest expense associated with
Jacor's borrowings under its credit facility and the issuance of various
debt securities in 1997. The assumed weighted average interest rate
associated with the borrowings is 7.9%.
(c) The adjustment represents miscellaneous income generated by Premiere for
periods prior to the acquisition.
(d) To provide for the tax effect of pro forma adjustments. The acquisition
adjustments described in Note (a) include non-deductible goodwill
amortization estimated to be approximately $1,350 for the year ended
December 31, 1997.
(e) The adjustments represent additional revenues and expenses, net of the
elimination of time brokerage agreement fees, related primarily to
Nationwide's acquisitions of radio stations in the Dallas, Phoenix and San
Diego broadcast areas. Nationwide has operated a majority of the stations
acquired in 1997 under local marketing agreements since January 1, 1997,
therefore a significant amount of the revenues and operating expenses
related to these stations are included in Nationwide's historical financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 1997. The adjustments for the
six months ended June 30, 1998 represent the elimination of time brokerage
agreement fees and additional depreciation and amortization expenses
resulting from the allocation of Nationwide's purchase price of KXGL in San
Diego.
(f) The adjustment represents elimination of Nationwide's gain on the sale and
exchange of certain radio stations in 1997.
(g) To provide for the tax effect of Nationwide's pro forma adjustments
relating to its 1997 acquisitions and divestitures at statutory rates.
(h) To eliminate the results for the divestiture of two San Diego stations.
(i) The adjustment reflects the additional depreciation and amortization
expense resulting from the allocation of Jacor's purchase price to the
assets acquired including an increase in property and equipment and
identifiable intangible assets to their estimated fair market values.
97
<PAGE> 104
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
(j) The adjustment reflects additional interest expense related to additional
borrowings under Jacor's credit facility, its 8% Notes and its 4 3/4%
Liquid Yield Option Notes offering completed during February of 1998 to
finance, in part, the acquisition of Nationwide.
(k) To provide for the tax effect of pro forma adjustments using an assumed
rate of 40%.
(l) To eliminate the results for the divestiture of two San Diego stations.
(m) The pro forma weighted average shares outstanding includes all shares
outstanding as of September 30, 1998. The pro forma weighted averages
shares outstanding of Jacor do not reflect any outstanding options and
warrants or the assumed conversion of the LYON's as they are antidilutive.
(n) The Company has experienced and anticipates continuing to experience
significant expense savings, which are not reflected in the pro forma
statements of operations, resulting from the elimination of redundant
broadcast operating expenses arising from the operation of multiple
stations in broadcast areas, changes in benefit plan and compensation
structures to conform with Jacor's and the elimination of Nationwide's
corporate office function.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS
YEAR ENDED ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
----------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ESTIMATED EXPENSE SAVINGS
Corporate general and administrative..... $ 3,623 $1,406
Benefit plan expenses.................... 2,850 1,741
Commissions.............................. 675 413
Promotion and programming................ 2,500 1,527
Personnel reductions..................... 3,200 1,955
Other.................................... 1,200 732
------- ------
TOTAL.......................... 14,048 7,774
Income Taxes............................. 5,619 3,110
------- ------
TOTAL, net of taxes............ $ 8,429 $4,664
======= ======
</TABLE>
98
<PAGE> 105
COMPARISON OF THE RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF JACOR COMMON
STOCK AND CLEAR CHANNEL COMMON STOCK
As a result of the merger, Jacor common stockholders will become holders of
Clear Channel common stock. Jacor is a Delaware corporation and Clear Channel is
a Texas corporation. The rights of Jacor stockholders are currently governed by
the Jacor charter, the Jacor bylaws and the laws of Delaware. Following the
merger, the rights of all former holders of Jacor common stock will be governed
by the Clear Channel charter, the Clear Channel bylaws, and the laws of Texas.
The following is a summary comparison of the material differences between the
rights of holders of Jacor common stock and holders of Clear Channel common
stock and more particularly certain material differences between certain
provisions of the Clear Channel charter and the Jacor charter, the Clear Channel
bylaws and the Jacor bylaws, and between certain provisions of the Delaware
General Corporation Law and the Texas Business Corporation Act. For information
on how to obtain copies of the Clear Channel charter, the Clear Channel bylaws,
the Jacor charter, and the Jacor bylaws, see "Where You Can Find More
Information." Furthermore, the description of the differences between Delaware
law and Texas law is a summary only, is not a complete description of the
differences between Delaware law and Texas law, and is qualified in its entirety
by references to Delaware law and Texas law.
AUTHORIZED CAPITAL
The total number of authorized shares of capital stock of Jacor is
104,000,000, consisting of 100,000,000 shares of Jacor common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, 2,000,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01
per share, and 2,000,000 shares of Class B Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per
share.
The total number of authorized shares of capital stock of Clear Channel is
610,000,000, consisting of 600,000,000 shares of Clear Channel common stock, par
value $0.10 per share, 2,000,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock, par value
$1.00 per share and 8,000,000 shares of Class B Preferred Stock, par value $1.00
per share.
NUMBER OF DIRECTORS; REMOVAL; VACANCIES
Number of Directors. Delaware law permits the charter or the bylaws of a
corporation to govern the number and terms of directors. However, if the charter
fixes the number of directors, such number may not be changed without amending
the certificate of incorporation. The Jacor bylaws state that the number of
directors shall be determined from time to time by the Jacor board, and in the
absence of such a determination by the Jacor board, such number shall be seven.
There are currently 10 directors serving on the Jacor board.
The Clear Channel bylaws authorize no less than one and no more than nine
directors, with the exact number to be determined by the Clear Channel board.
Delaware law permits the charter or bylaws of a corporation to provide that
directors be divided into up to three classes, with the term of office of each
class of directors expiring in successive years. Neither the Jacor charter nor
the Jacor bylaws provide for the Jacor board to be divided into classes.
Neither the Clear Channel charter nor the Clear Channel bylaws provide for
the Clear Channel board to be divided into classes.
99
<PAGE> 106
Removal. Under Delaware law, the holders of a majority of the shares
entitled to vote at any election of directors, or in the case of class voting,
the holders of a majority of the shares of that class may remove any director or
the entire board, with or without cause, except in the case of a corporation
with a classified board. If a Delaware corporation has a classified board,
stockholders may remove a director or directors only for cause, unless the
charter otherwise provides. The Jacor charter does not provide for a classified
board.
Under Texas law, the bylaws or charter of a Texas corporation may provide
that at any meeting of stockholders called expressly for that purpose, the
holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of
directors may vote to remove any director or the entire board, with or without
cause, subject to further restrictions on removal that the bylaws may contain.
No further restriction is contained in the Clear Channel bylaws. The Clear
Channel bylaws provide that a director may also be removed by written consent of
the stockholders.
Vacancies. Under Delaware law and the Jacor bylaws a majority of the
directors then in office (even though less than a quorum) may fill vacancies and
newly-created directorships. However, Delaware law also provides that if the
directors then in office constitute less than a majority of the whole board, the
Court of Chancery may, upon application of any stockholder or stockholders
holding at least 10% of the total number of shares at the time outstanding
entitled to vote for directors, order an election to be held to fill any such
vacancy or newly created directorship.
Under Texas law, the stockholders or a majority of the remaining directors
may fill any vacancy occurring in the board of directors. A directorship to be
filled by reason of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by the
stockholders or by the board of directors for a term of office continuing only
until the next election of one or more directors by the stockholders. However,
the board of directors may not fill more than two such directorships during the
period between any two successive annual meetings of stockholders.
CHARTER AMENDMENTS
Under Delaware law, the board and stockholders may amend the corporation's
charter if:
- the board sets forth the proposed amendment in a resolution, declares the
advisability of the amendment, and directs that it be submitted to a vote
at a meeting of stockholders; and
- the holders of at least a majority of shares of stock entitled to vote
thereon approve the amendment, unless the charter requires the vote of a
greater number of shares.
The Jacor charter does not require the vote of a greater number of shares.
In addition, each class or series of stock affected, even if such stock would
not otherwise have such rights, must approve by a majority vote amendments which
make changes relating to the capital stock by increasing or decreasing the par
value or the aggregate number of authorized shares of a class, or otherwise
adversely affecting the rights of such class.
Under Texas law, the board and stockholders may amend the corporation's
charter if:
- the board of directors sets forth the proposed amendment in a resolution
and directs that it be submitted to a vote at a meeting of stockholders;
and
100
<PAGE> 107
- the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to
vote thereon approve it by affirmative vote, unless the charter otherwise
requires the vote of a different number of shares.
In addition, each class or series of stock affected, even if such stock would
not otherwise have such rights, must approve by at least a two-thirds majority
vote amendments which make changes relating to the capital stock by increasing
or decreasing the par value or the aggregate number of authorized shares of such
class, or otherwise adversely affecting the rights of such class. The Clear
Channel charter does not require a number of shares different from Texas law to
approve an amendment to the Clear Channel charter.
BYLAW AMENDMENTS
Under Delaware law, the power to adopt, alter and repeal the bylaws is
vested in the stockholders, except to the extent that a corporation's charter or
bylaws vest it in the board of directors. However, if the power to adopt, alter
and repeal the bylaws is granted to the directors, the stockholders still hold
the power to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws. The Jacor charter grants the
Jacor board concurrent power with the stockholders to make, alter, amend,
change, add to or repeal the Jacor bylaws. The stockholders or board may alter,
amend or repeal the Jacor bylaws or adopt new bylaws by:
- the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the total
voting power of all shares of Jacor stock entitled to vote in the
election of directors, considered as one class; or
- the Jacor board, at any regular meeting of the stockholders or the Jacor
board or at any special meeting of the stockholders or of the Jacor
board, if notice of such alteration, amendment, repeal or adoption of new
bylaws is contained in the notice of such special meeting.
Under Texas law, a board of directors may amend or repeal a corporation's
bylaws, or adopt new bylaws, unless:
- the charter reserves such power exclusively to the stockholders; or
- the stockholders, in amending, repealing or adopting a particular by-law
provision, expressly provide that the board may not amend or repeal that
by-law.
In all cases, Texas law provides stockholders the power to amend or repeal
the bylaws unless the charter or a bylaw adopted by the stockholders provides
otherwise. The Clear Channel charter and the Clear Channel bylaws do not provide
otherwise.
ADVANCE NOTICE OF DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS AND NEW BUSINESS
Neither the Jacor charter nor Jacor bylaws contain any provisions regarding
advance notice of nominations of persons for election to the Jacor board or
submission of other business to be considered at a meeting of Jacor
stockholders.
Neither the Clear Channel charter nor Clear Channel bylaws contain any
provisions regarding advance notice of nominations of persons for election to
the Clear Channel board or submission of other business to be considered at a
meeting of Clear Channel stockholders.
SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS
Delaware law provides that the board of directors or such person or persons
authorized in the corporation's charter or bylaws may call a special meeting of
101
<PAGE> 108
stockholders. The Jacor bylaws provide that one-third of the directors then in
office, the chief executive officer, or stockholders holding at least 10% of all
issued and outstanding Jacor common stock may call special meetings.
Texas law provides that, in addition to the board of directors, the
president, or other persons authorized in the corporation's charter or bylaws,
holders of not less than 10% of all the shares entitled to vote have the right
to call a special stockholders' meeting, unless the charter provides otherwise.
The Clear Channel charter does not alter the statutory rule permitting the call
of a special meeting by holders of not less than 10%.
CUMULATIVE VOTING
Delaware law permits cumulative voting for the election of directors if
provided by the charter, but the Jacor charter does not so provide.
Texas law permits cumulative voting for the election of directors unless
the charter expressly prohibits cumulative voting. The Clear Channel charter
expressly prohibits cumulative voting.
STOCKHOLDER ACTION WITHOUT A MEETING
Under Delaware law, unless the charter provides otherwise, stockholders may
take any action without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if
the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of
votes that would be necessary to authorize such action at a meeting at which all
shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted sign a written consent
setting forth the action taken. The Jacor bylaws provide for such stockholder
consent by less than unanimous written consent.
Under Texas law, stockholders may take any action without a meeting,
without prior notice and without a vote if all stockholders entitled to vote on
the matter consent to the action in writing. If a corporation's charter so
provides, stockholders may take any action under Texas law by a consent signed
by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of
votes that would be necessary to authorize or take this action at a meeting. The
Clear Channel charter provides for such stockholder consent by less than
unanimous written consent.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
Extraordinary Transactions. Except as provided below, and in certain other
limited circumstances, Delaware law requires that a merger, a sale, lease,
exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the property of the
corporation not in the usual and regular course of the corporation's business,
or a dissolution of the corporation, be approved by the holders of a majority of
the shares entitled to vote thereon, unless the charter provides otherwise.
Except as provided below, and in certain other limited circumstances, Texas
law requires that such a merger, a disposition not in the regular course of
business, or a dissolution of the corporation be approved by the holder of at
least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote thereon, unless the charter
requires the vote of a different number of shares which may not be less than a
majority of the shares entitled to vote thereon.
Absence of Required Vote for Certain Mergers. Delaware law does not require
a vote of the stockholders of a corporation surviving a merger to approve a
merger if:
- the agreement of merger does not amend the charter of such corporation;
102
<PAGE> 109
- each share of stock of such corporation outstanding immediately before
the merger is to be an identical outstanding or treasury share of the
surviving corporation thereafter; and
- the number of shares of common stock of such corporation to be issued in
the merger, if any, does not exceed 20% of the number of shares
outstanding immediately before the merger.
Texas law does not require a vote of the stockholders of a corporation
surviving a merger to approve the merger if:
- such corporation is the sole surviving corporation in the merger;
- the charter of such corporation will not differ from its charter before
the merger;
- each stockholder of such corporation whose shares are outstanding
immediately before the effective date of the merger will hold the same
number of shares, with identical designations, preferences, limitations
and relative rights, immediately after the effective date of the merger;
- the voting power of the number of voting shares outstanding immediately
after the merger, plus the voting power of the number of voting shares of
such corporation that the corporation will issue in the merger, if any,
does not exceed 20% of the voting power of the total number of voting
shares outstanding immediately before the merger;
- the number of participating shares, that is, shares whose holders are
entitled to participate without limitation on dividends or other
distributions, of such corporation that the corporation will issue in the
merger, if any, does not exceed 20% of the number of such shares
outstanding immediately before the merger; and
- the board of directors of the corporation adopts a resolution approving
the plan of merger.
STATE TAKEOVER LEGISLATION
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits a corporation
from engaging in a "business combination," as defined below in this paragraph,
with a person who, together with his associates and affiliates, owns, or if the
person is an affiliate of the corporation did own within the last three years,
15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation for a period of
three years following the time that such person became an interested
stockholder, unless:
- prior to such time, the board of directors of the corporation approved
the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
- upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the interested
stockholder becoming such, the interested stockholder owned at least 85%
of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time such
transaction commenced, subject to certain adjustments; or
- on or after the date of the business combination, the board of directors
and the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock
not owned by the interested stockholder approve the business combination.
Delaware law defines a "business combination" generally as:
- a merger or consolidation with the interested stockholder or with any
other corporation if the merger or consolidation is caused by the
interested stockholder;
103
<PAGE> 110
- a sale or other disposition to or with the interested stockholder of
assets with an aggregate market value equal to 10% or more of either the
aggregate market value of all assets of the corporation or the aggregate
market value of all of the outstanding stock of the corporation;
- with certain exceptions, any transaction resulting in the issuance or
transfer by the corporation or any majority-owned subsidiary of any stock
of the corporation or such subsidiary to the interested stockholder;
- any transaction involving the corporation or a majority-owned subsidiary
that has the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the stock of
the corporation or any such subsidiary owned by the interested
stockholder; or
- any receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans or
other financial benefits provided by the corporation or any
majority-owned subsidiary.
Texas law imposes a special voting requirement for the approval of certain
business combinations and related party transactions between public corporations
and affiliated stockholders unless the board of directors of the corporation
approves the transaction or the acquisition of shares by the affiliated
stockholder prior to the affiliated stockholder becoming an affiliated
stockholder. Texas law prohibits certain mergers, sales of assets,
reclassifications and other transactions between stockholders beneficially
owning 20% or more of the outstanding stock of a Texas public corporation for a
period of three years following the stockholder acquiring shares representing
20% or more of the corporation's voting power unless two-thirds of the
unaffiliated stockholders approve the transaction at a meeting held no earlier
than six months after the stockholder acquires that ownership. Such a vote of
stockholders is not necessary if the board of directors approves the transaction
or approves the purchase of shares by the affiliated stockholder before the
affiliated stockholder acquires beneficial ownership of 20% of the shares, or if
the affiliated stockholder was an affiliated stockholder before December 31,
1996, and continued as such through the date of the transaction. Texas law does
not contain the Delaware 85% unaffiliated share tender offer exception.
Delaware law applies to business combinations in which Jacor may be
involved, including the merger. In connection with the merger, in approving the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the Jacor board
satisfied the prior approval requirement under Delaware law. Thus, Delaware law
will not restrict the merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement. Because Texas law and Delaware law are similar on this
issue, there will be no significant difference after the merger between Jacor's
current susceptibility to, and its stockholders' rights in the event of, a
business combination or takeover and Clear Channel's susceptibility to, and its
stockholders' rights in the event of, a business combination or takeover.
STANDARD OF CONDUCT FOR DIRECTORS
Under Delaware law, the standards of conduct for directors have developed
through written opinions of the Delaware courts in cases decided by them.
Generally, directors of Delaware corporations are subject to a duty of loyalty
and a duty of care. The duty of loyalty has been said to require directors to
refrain from self-dealing. According to the Delaware Supreme Court, the duty of
care requires "directors...in managing the corporate affairs...to use that
amount of care which ordinarily careful and prudent men would use in similar
circumstances." Later case law has established "gross negligence" as the test
for
104
<PAGE> 111
breach of the standard for the duty of care in the decision-making process of
directors of Delaware corporations.
Similarly, under Texas law, the standards of conduct for directors have
developed through written opinions of the Texas courts in cases decided by them.
However, Texas case law concerning standards of conduct for directors is not as
well developed as Delaware case law. Generally, directors of Texas corporations
are subject to a duty of loyalty and a duty of care. The duty of loyalty
prohibits a director from profiting at the expense of the corporation in
connection with the director's dealings with the corporation, third parties, and
stockholders. The duty of care requires directors to act in good faith and to
exercise the same degree of care and prudence that ordinary persons in a like
position under similar circumstances would use.
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Scope. Under Delaware law, indemnification rights are expressly
nonexclusive. A corporation is permitted to provide indemnification or
advancement of expenses, by a by-law provision, agreement or otherwise, against
judgments, fines, expenses and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such proceeding if he acted
in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interest of the corporation and with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, if he had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.
However, no indemnification shall be made with respect to any matter as to which
such person is adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless the court shall
determine that such person is entitled to indemnity.
The Jacor bylaws provide, in substance, that Jacor will indemnify any
person who was or is a party, or threatened to be made a party, to any type of
proceeding, because he or she is or was a director of Jacor (and Jacor, in the
discretion of the Jacor board, may so indemnify a person because he or she is or
was an officer or employee of Jacor or is or was serving at the request of Jacor
in any other capacity for or on behalf of Jacor), will be indemnified by Jacor
to the full extent permitted by Delaware law, against any liability or expense,
actually or reasonably incurred by such person in respect thereof; provided,
however, that Jacor will not be obligated to indemnify any such person:
- with respect to any proceedings, claims or actions initiated or brought
voluntarily without the authorization or consent of Jacor by such person
and not by way of defense; or
- for any amounts paid in settlement of an action without the prior written
consent of Jacor to that settlement.
Texas law permits a corporation to provide indemnification or advancement
of expenses, by a bylaw provision, agreement, security arrangement or otherwise
against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses
actually incurred by the person in connection with the proceeding if a court
determines:
- that the person conducted himself or herself in good faith;
- in the case of conduct in his or her official capacity, reasonably
believed that his or her conduct was in the corporation's best interest;
- in all other cases that his or her conduct was not opposed to the
corporation's best interests; and
105
<PAGE> 112
- in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe
his or her conduct was unlawful.
However, if the person is found liable to the corporation, or if the person is
found liable on the basis that he received an improper personal benefit,
indemnification under Texas law is limited to the reimbursement of reasonable
expenses. No indemnification will be available if the person is found liable for
willful or intentional misconduct.
The Clear Channel charter requires that Clear Channel indemnify directors
and officers, except in matters in which such director or officer is found
liable for negligence or misconduct in performing his duties to the corporation.
Advancement of Expenses. Delaware law provides for the advancement of
expenses for such proceedings upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of
such person to repay such amount if a court determines that such person is not
entitled to be indemnified. This undertaking, however, need not be in writing.
Delaware law does not require that such director give an affirmation regarding
his conduct in order to receive an advance of expenses.
Texas law provides that a corporation may pay or reimburse, in advance of
the final disposition of the proceedings, reasonable court costs and attorneys'
fees incurred by a director who was, is, or is threatened to be made, a named
defendant or respondent in a proceeding because the person is or was a director
of such corporation. The corporation may pay or reimburse such expenses after
the corporation receives:
- a written affirmation by the director of his good faith belief that he
has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification under Texas
law; and
- a written undertaking by the director to repay the amount paid or
reimbursed if it is ultimately determined that he has not met those
requirements or indemnification for such expenses is precluded under
Texas law.
Procedure for Indemnification. Delaware law provides that:
- a majority vote of directors who are not party to the proceeding even
though less than a quorum;
- if there are no such directors, or if such directors so direct,
independent legal counsel; or
- stockholder vote, can determine that indemnification is appropriate under
Delaware law.
Texas law provides that:
- a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who are not party to
the proceeding;
- if such a quorum cannot be obtained, a special committee of the board of
directors consisting of at least two directors not party to the
proceeding;
- special legal counsel; or
- stockholder vote excluding shares held by directors party to the
proceeding, can determine that indemnification is appropriate under Texas
law.
Mandatory Indemnification. Delaware law requires indemnification with
respect to any claim, issue or matter on which the director is successful on the
merits or otherwise, in the
106
<PAGE> 113
defense of the proceeding. Under Texas law, indemnification by the corporation
is mandatory only if the director is wholly successful on the merits or
otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding.
Insurance. Delaware law and Texas law both allow a corporation to purchase
and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation against any liability asserted
against such person and incurred by such person in such a capacity or arising
out of his status as such a person whether or not the corporation would have the
power to indemnify him against that liability. Under Texas law, a corporation
may also establish and maintain arrangements, other than insurance, to protect
these individuals, including a trust fund or surety arrangement. As noted above,
indemnification rights under Delaware law are expressly nonexclusive.
Persons Covered. Delaware law provides substantially the same
indemnification rights to officers, employees and agents as it provides for
directors. Texas law expressly and separately deals with the protection
available for officers, employees and agents. Such protections are similar to
those provided to directors.
Continuity of Indemnification. Delaware law contains a provision that
expressly provides that the statutory indemnification provisions:
- apply to a director after he leaves the corporation for acts he performed
while a director; and
- apply to the estate and personal representatives of the director.
Texas law does not have a provision that expressly provides indemnification
after a directorship has terminated for acts or omissions which took place prior
to such termination.
Stockholder Report. Texas law requires a report to the stockholders upon
indemnification or advancement of expenses. Delaware law does not have a similar
reporting requirement.
LIMITATION OF PERSONAL LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Delaware law provides that a corporation's charter may include a provision
limiting the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty as a director.
However, no such provision can limit the liability of a director for:
- any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders;
- acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of the law;
- violation of certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law;
- any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit; or
- any act or omission prior to the adoption of such a provision in the
charter.
The Jacor charter eliminates the monetary liability of directors to the fullest
extent permitted by law. Such provisions do not limit the availability of
equitable relief to Jacor or its stockholders.
Under Texas law, a corporation's charter may eliminate all monetary
liability of each director to the corporation or its stockholders for conduct in
the performance of such director's duties other than certain conduct
specifically excluded from protection. Texas law does not permit any limitation
of liability of a director for:
107
<PAGE> 114
- breaching the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;
- failing to act in good faith;
- engaging in intentional misconduct or a known violation of law;
- obtaining an improper personal benefit from the corporation; or
- violating applicable statutes that expressly provide for the liability of
a director.
The Clear Channel charter eliminates the monetary liability of Clear Channel's
directors to the fullest extent permitted by law.
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Generally under Delaware law, stockholders have the right to demand and
receive payment in cash of the fair value of their stock, as appraised pursuant
to judicial proceedings, in lieu of the consideration such stockholder would
otherwise receive in the event of a merger or consolidation in such transaction.
However, except as otherwise provided by Delaware law, a stockholder does not
have appraisal rights in connection with a merger or consolidation or in the
case of a disposition if:
- the shares of such corporation are listed on a national securities
exchange, designated as a national market system security by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record by more than
2,000 stockholders; or
- such corporation will be the surviving corporation of the merger and
Delaware law does not require a vote of the stockholders of the surviving
corporation to approve such merger.
However, a stockholder is entitled to appraisal rights in the case of a
merger or consolidation, if the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation
require such stockholder to accept in exchange for his shares anything other
than:
- shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such
merger or consolidation;
- shares of any other corporation that at the effective date of the merger
or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange
or designated as a national market system security by the NASD or held of
record by more than 2,000 stockholders; or
- cash in lieu of fractional shares.
Generally, under Texas law, a stockholder has:
- the right to dissent from any plan of merger or consolidation or
disposition to which such corporation is a party if Texas law requires a
stockholder vote; and
- appraisal rights upon compliance with the statutory procedures.
Under Texas law, a stockholder of a corporation does not have the right to
dissent or to assert appraisal rights if:
- the shares held by such stockholder are part of a class or series of
shares that are listed on a national securities exchange, or held of
record by not less than 2,000 holders, on the record date fixed to
determine the stockholders entitled to vote on the plan of merger or
consolidation or disposition; and
- the stockholder is not required by the terms of the plan of merger or
consolidation or disposition to accept for his shares any consideration
other than (a) shares of the corporation that, immediately after the
effective date of the merger, will be part of
108
<PAGE> 115
a class the shares of which are (x) listed or authorized for listing upon
official notice of issuance, on a national securities exchange, or (y)
held of record by not less than 2,000 holders or (b) cash in lieu of
fractional shares that such stockholder is otherwise entitled to receive.
PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
Under Delaware law, a stockholder does not have preemptive rights unless
the corporation's charter specifically grants such rights. The Jacor charter
provides that no Jacor stockholder shall by reason of holding shares of any
class of stock have any preemptive or preferential right to purchase or
subscribe to any shares of any class of Jacor stock or to any debt instruments
or other securities convertible into any class of such stock.
Under Texas law, preemptive rights exist automatically with respect to
unissued or treasury shares owned by the corporation, unless the charter limits
those rights. The Clear Channel charter expressly denies any such preemptive
rights.
DENIAL OF VOTING RIGHTS
Delaware law provides that holders of the outstanding shares of a class of
stock shall be entitled to vote as a class upon a proposed amendment to the
charter, whether or not entitled to vote thereon by the charter, if the
amendment would change the aggregate number of authorized shares or the par
value of the class or would adversely affect the powers, preferences or special
rights of the class.
Texas law provides that holders of each class of shares are entitled to
vote as a class upon a proposed amendment to the charter, whether or not
entitled to vote thereon by the charter, if the amendment would change the
number of authorized shares or the par value of the class, reclassify, cancel,
or exchange shares of the class, create a new class of shares having equal or
superior preferences or rights of the class, or increase the rights of an
already outstanding class, or would adversely affect the powers, preferences or
special rights of the class.
PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS
Under Delaware law, a board of directors may authorize a corporation to
make distributions to its stockholders, subject to any restrictions in its
charter, either out of surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits
for the fiscal year in which the board declares the dividend and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Delaware law does not permit distributions out of net
profits, however, if, following the distribution, the corporation's capital is
less than the aggregate amount of capital represented by the issued and
outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of
assets. The Jacor charter does not further restrict the ability of the Jacor
board to declare dividends.
Under Texas law, a board of directors may authorize a corporation to make
distributions to its stockholders out of its surplus, subject to any restriction
in its charter. Texas law does not permit distributions if such distribution
exceeds the surplus of the corporation or would render the corporation
insolvent. The Clear Channel charter does not further restrict the ability of
the Clear Channel board to declare dividends.
INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS
Under Delaware law, any stockholder of a Delaware corporation may examine
the list of stockholders and any stockholder making a written demand may inspect
any other
109
<PAGE> 116
corporate books and records for any purpose reasonably related to the
stockholder's interest as a stockholder.
Under Texas law, any stockholder who holds at least 5% of all of the
outstanding shares of a corporation or that has held his shares for at least six
months will have the right to examine at any reasonable time, for any proper
purpose, the relevant books and records of account, minutes and share transfer
records of the corporation.
BUSINESS OF JACOR
RADIO BROADCASTING
As of October 7, 1998, Jacor was the second largest radio group in the
United States in terms of number of radio stations, the third largest radio
group in the nation as measured by revenue, and a leading provider of syndicated
radio programming. As of such date, Jacor owned, operated, represented and/or
entered into agreements to acquire 230 radio stations and one television station
in 55 markets across the United States. Jacor also produces more than 50
syndicated programs and services for more than 4,000 radio stations, which
programs include Rush Limbaugh, The Dr. Laura Schlessinger Show and Dr. Dean
Edell, the top three rated radio programs in the United States.
The following table sets forth certain selected information with regard to
each of Jacor's 78 AM and 149 FM radio stations which it owned or programmed, or
for which it sold airtime, as of October 7, 1998. Excluded from the following
table are the one AM and two FM Mexican radio stations for which Jacor provides
programming to and sells the airtime for under exclusive sales agency
arrangements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AM FM
MARKET STATIONS STATIONS TOTAL
- ------ -------- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ARIZONA
Phoenix..................................... -- 2 2
CALIFORNIA
Antelope Valley............................. 1(a) 2(a) 3
Los Angeles/Thousand Oaks................... 3 2 5
Riverside................................... 2(b) -- 2
San Diego................................... 3 5 8
San Francisco............................... -- 2(b) 2
San Jose.................................... -- 3 3
Santa Barbara............................... 2 3 5
Santa Clarita............................... 1(a) -- 1
COLORADO
Denver...................................... 3 5 8
Ft. Collins-Greeley......................... 2 2 4
FLORIDA
Jacksonville................................ 2 3 5
Punta Gorda................................. 1 2 3
Sarasota.................................... 2 4(c) 6
Tampa/St. Petersburg........................ 2 5(d) 7
GEORGIA
Atlanta..................................... 1 4(b) 5
</TABLE>
110
<PAGE> 117
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AM FM
MARKET STATIONS STATIONS TOTAL
- ------ -------- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
IDAHO
Boise....................................... 2 4 6
Idaho Falls/Pocatello....................... 2 3 5
Twin Falls.................................. 1 2 3
IOWA
Cedar Rapids................................ 2 2 4
Des Moines.................................. 1 2 3
Ft. Madison/Burlington...................... 2 2 4
KENTUCKY
Lexington................................... 2 4 6
Louisville.................................. 1 5(e) 6(f)
LOUISIANA
Shreveport.................................. 2 3 5
MARYLAND
Baltimore................................... 2 1 3
MISSOURI
St. Louis................................... 1 5 6
NEVADA
Las Vegas................................... -- 4 4
NEW YORK
Rochester................................... 2 5 7
NORTH DAKOTA
Bismark..................................... 1 1 2
OHIO
Chillicothe................................. 2(b) 1 3
Cincinnati.................................. 4(g) 4(b) 8
Cleveland................................... 1 4 5
Columbus.................................... 2 3 5
Dayton...................................... 1 5 6
Findlay..................................... -- 2 2
Greenville.................................. -- 1 1
Lima........................................ 1 3 4
Marion...................................... 1 2 3
Sandusky.................................... 1 2 3
Springfield................................. 1 -- 1
Toledo...................................... 2 3 5
Washington Court House...................... 1 1 2
Youngstown.................................. 2(b) 3(b) 5
OREGON
Albany/Corvallis............................ 2 2 4
Medford..................................... 1 4 5
Portland.................................... 2 3(c) 5
PENNSYLVANIA
Pittsburgh.................................. 1 -- 1
SOUTH CAROLINA
Charleston.................................. -- 4 4
</TABLE>
111
<PAGE> 118
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AM FM
MARKET STATIONS STATIONS TOTAL
- ------ -------- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
TEXAS
Dallas...................................... -- 2 2
Houston..................................... -- 3 3
UTAH
Salt Lake City.............................. 3(b) 4(b) 7
WASHINGTON
Centralia................................... 1(a) 1(a) 2
WYOMING
Casper...................................... 2(c) 1 3
Cheyenne.................................... 1 4(b) 5
-- --- ---
Total............................. 78 149 227
== === ===
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) Jacor provides programming and sells airtime pursuant to a local marketing
agreement. Jacor does not own the FCC license for these stations.
(b) Includes one station for which Jacor provides programming and sells airtime
pursuant to a local marketing agreement. Jacor does not own the FCC
license.
(c) Includes one unconstructed station which is not yet operating.
(d) Includes one FM station in Tampa, Florida proposed to be divested in
connection with the merger.
(e) Includes one station for which Jacor sells airtime pursuant to a joint
sales agreement. The FCC license is not owned by Jacor.
(f) These Louisville stations, including the joint sales agreement, are
proposed to be divested in connection with the merger.
(g) Includes two stations for which Jacor provides programming and sells
airtime pursuant to a local marketing agreement. Jacor does not own the FCC
license.
TELEVISION BROADCASTING
Jacor also owns a television station, WKRC-TV, in Cincinnati. WKRC-TV is an
affiliate of CBS.
BROADCASTING RELATED SERVICES
Additionally, Jacor and its wholly owned subsidiary, Premiere Radio
Networks, Inc., are a leading provider of syndicated radio programming in the
country. Jacor syndicates the nation's leading radio talk shows, including Rush
Limbaugh, The Dr. Laura Schlessinger Show, Dr. Dean Edell and Art Bell's
overnight programs, Dreamland and Coast to Coast. Jacor also owns NSN Network
Services, Ltd., a satellite systems integration company that provides design,
communications technology and support to establish and maintain global satellite
connectivity to companies worldwide.
MATERIAL ACQUISITION
In August 1998, Jacor acquired the assets of 17 radio stations from
Nationwide Communications, Inc. and its affiliated entities. The price paid by
Jacor in this asset acquisition consisted of approximately $620 million in cash.
We have incorporated by reference in this document additional information
concerning Jacor. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 127.
112
<PAGE> 119
BUSINESS OF CLEAR CHANNEL
Clear Channel consists of three principal business segments -- radio
broadcasting, television broadcasting and outdoor advertising. The radio segment
includes both stations for which Clear Channel is the licensee and stations for
which Clear Channel programs and/or sells air time under local marketing
agreements or joint sales agreements. The radio segment also operates radio
networks. The television segment includes both television stations for which
Clear Channel is the licensee and stations programmed under local marketing
agreements. The outdoor advertising segment includes both advertising display
faces which Clear Channel owns and/or manages under license management
agreements.
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
For the year ended December 31, 1997, Clear Channel derived approximately
48% of its net revenue from radio operations, approximately 22% from television
operations, and approximately 30% from outdoor advertising operations.
The following table presents selected information relating to radio and
television broadcasting for 1995, 1996 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
RADIO
Net revenue.............................. $144,244 $217,189 $332,571
Operating expenses....................... 87,531 126,628 201,182
Depreciation............................. 6,974 8,916 13,252
Amortization of intangibles.............. 13,007 18,840 35,215
-------- -------- --------
$ 36,732 $ 62,805 $ 82,922
======== ======== ========
TELEVISION
Net revenue.............................. $105,815 $134,550 $157,062
Operating expenses....................... 49,973 71,704 85,132
Depreciation............................. 8,406 10,420 11,563
Amortization of intangibles.............. 5,382 7,614 6,353
-------- -------- --------
$ 42,054 $ 44,812 $ 54,014
======== ======== ========
OUTDOOR*
Net revenue.............................. -- -- $207,435
Operating expenses....................... -- -- 108,090
Depreciation............................. -- -- 26,885
Amortization of intangibles.............. -- -- 20,939
-------- -------- --------
-- -- $ 51,521
======== ======== ========
CONSOLIDATED
Net revenue.............................. $250,059 $351,739 $697,068
Operating expenses....................... 137,504 198,332 394,404
Depreciation............................. 15,380 19,336 51,700
Amortization of intangibles.............. 18,389 26,454 62,507
-------- -------- --------
$ 78,786 $107,617 $188,457
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
* Clear Channel acquired Eller Media Corporation in April 1997. Clear Channel
acquired Universal Outdoor Holdings, Inc. in April 1998. Clear Channel
acquired all of the outstanding stock of More Group, Plc. in multiple closings
and finalized the acquisition in August of 1998.
113
<PAGE> 120
The following comparative analyses of the operating results for 1997, 1996
and 1995 are presented on an as-reported and a pro forma basis. The pro forma
results for the 1997 vs. 1996 assume the following list of acquisitions by Clear
Channel had occurred on January 1, 1996. The pro forma results for the 1996 vs.
1995 assume the acquisitions Radio Equity Partners and US Radio, Inc. by Clear
Channel had occurred on January 1, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DATE
INCLUDED IN
BUSINESS MERGED/ACQUIRED SEGMENT AS-REPORTED
- ------------------------ ------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Paxson Radio........................... Radio & Outdoor October 1997
Eller Media Company.................... Outdoor April 1997
Radio Equity Partners.................. Radio June 1996
US Radio, Inc.......................... Radio May 1996
</TABLE>
RADIO
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 VS. 1996 1996 VS. 1995
------------------------ ------------------------
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, AS-REPORTED PRO FORMA AS-REPORTED PRO FORMA
------------------------------ % INCREASE % INCREASE % INCREASE % INCREASE
1997 1996 1995 (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
-------- -------- -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue............... $332,571 $217,189 $144,244 53.1% 25.0% 50.6% 25.9%
Operating expenses........ 201,182 126,628 87,531 58.9% 23.6% 44.7% 27.7%
Operating income before
depreciation and
amortization............ 131,389 90,561 56,713 45.1% 27.7% 59.7% 23.3%
Depreciation and
amortization............ 48,467 27,756 19,981 74.6% 9.9% 38.9% 5.2%
Operating income.......... 82,922 62,805 36,732 32.0% 49.5% 71.0% 39.7%
</TABLE>
With the passage of the Telecommunications Act in February 1996, the limit
on the maximum number of licenses that one company may own in the United States
was eliminated, and the limit on the number of licenses that one company may own
in any given market was changed. This limit depends on the size of the market;
in the largest markets, for example, one company may not own more than eight
licenses total, with no more than five licenses of one service (AM or FM). This
allows Clear Channel significant flexibility in future growth in its radio
broadcasting operations.
1997 VS. 1996. The majority of the increase in as-reported net revenue,
operating expenses and depreciation and amortization was due to the
aforementioned radio acquisitions. At December 31, 1997, the radio segment
included 156 stations for which Clear Channel owned the FCC license and 17
stations which Clear Channel programmed under local marketing or time brokerage
agreements. These 173 radio stations operate in 40 different markets.
The majority of the increase in pro forma net revenue is due to the
increase in rates charged to advertisers primarily related to an increase in
overall ratings, especially in our Houston, Austin, Tampa and Miami markets. The
majority of the increase in pro forma operating expenses is due to the increase
in selling and promotional expenses associated with the increase in revenue.
1996 VS. 1995. The majority of the increase in as-reported net revenue,
operating expenses and depreciation and amortization was due to the
aforementioned radio acquisitions of Radio Equity Partners and US Radio in 1996.
114
<PAGE> 121
The majority of the increase in pro forma revenue was due to the general
increase in radio revenues in our markets. Pro forma expenses increased as a
result of the increase in selling expenses related to these revenues.
TELEVISION
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 VS. 1996 1996 VS. 1995
------------------------ ------------------------
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, AS-REPORTED PRO FORMA AS-REPORTED PRO FORMA
------------------------------ % INCREASE % INCREASE % INCREASE % INCREASE
1997 1996 1995 (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
-------- -------- -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue............... $157,062 $134,550 $105,815 16.7 % n/a 27.2% n/a
Operating expenses........ 85,132 71,704 49,973 18.7 % n/a 43.5% n/a
Operating income before
depreciation and
amortization............ 71,930 62,846 55,842 14.5 % n/a 12.5% n/a
Depreciation and
amortization............ 17,916 18,034 13,788 (0.7)% n/a 30.8% n/a
Operating income.......... 54,014 44,812 42,054 20.5 % n/a 6.6% n/a
</TABLE>
With passage of the Telecommunications Act in February 1996, the
restrictions on ownership of television stations include a national ownership
limit of stations that reach no more than 35% of the total United States
television audience and the limit of one license per market for any one
broadcaster. This allows Clear Channel a greater opportunity to expand into
additional markets in television broadcasting.
1997 VS. 1996. The increase in as-reported net revenue was primarily due to
a full year of operations for WPRI-TV and WNAC-TV that were acquired in July of
1996 and from improved ratings at several of the television stations.
As-reported operating expenses rose predominantly due to the inclusion of a full
year of operations for the aforementioned television station acquisitions and
the increase in selling expenses related to the increase in revenue. At December
31, 1997, the television segment included 11 television stations for which Clear
Channel owned the FCC license and seven stations which Clear Channel programmed
under time sales or time brokerage agreements. These 18 television stations
operate in 11 different markets.
1996 VS. 1995. The majority of the increase in as-reported net revenue was
due to the inclusion of the aforementioned television acquisitions in 1996 and
WHP-TV and WLYH-TV in Harrisburg, PA and WTEV-TV in Jacksonville, FL in 1995.
Operating expenses rose due to the increase in selling expenses associated with
these revenue increases, the inclusion of the aforementioned television
acquisitions in 1996 and 1995, and the start-up costs of the news departments at
four television stations. The major cause of the increase in depreciation and
amortization was the acquisition of tangible and intangible assets associated
with the purchase of the aforementioned television stations.
115
<PAGE> 122
OUTDOOR
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 VS. 1996 1996 VS. 1995
YEARS ENDED ------------------------ ------------------------
DECEMBER 31, AS-REPORTED PRO FORMA AS-REPORTED PRO FORMA
---------------------- % INCREASE % INCREASE % INCREASE % INCREASE
1997 1996 1995 (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
-------- ---- ---- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenue...................... $207,435 n/a n/a n/a 11.4% n/a n/a
Operating expenses............... 108,090 n/a n/a n/a 0.0% n/a n/a
Operating income before
depreciation and
amortization................... 99,345 n/a n/a n/a 28.4% n/a n/a
Depreciation and amortization.... 47,824 n/a n/a n/a 0.3% n/a n/a
Operating income................. 51,521 n/a n/a n/a 86.4% n/a n/a
</TABLE>
1997 VS. 1996. In April 1997, Clear Channel entered the outdoor advertising
business through its acquisition of Eller Media Company. Pro forma revenue
increased primarily due to improved occupancy and increased rates for usage of
display faces resulting in the increases in pro forma operating income before
depreciation and amortization and pro forma operating income. At December 31,
1997, the outdoor segment owned 53,963 display faces and operated 3,697 displays
under lease management agreements, in 15 markets.
RADIO BROADCASTING
The following table sets forth certain selected information with regard to
each of Clear Channel's 66 AM and 135 FM radio stations that it owned or
programmed, or for which it sold airtime, as of October 7, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AM FM
MARKET STATIONS STATIONS TOTAL
- ------ -------- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ALABAMA
Mobile........................................ 2 4 6
ARKANSAS
Little Rock................................... -- 5 5
CALIFORNIA
Monterey...................................... 2 4 6
CONNECTICUT
New Haven..................................... 2 1 3
FLORIDA
Daytona Beach................................. -- 1 1
Florida Keys.................................. 1(a) 5 6
Ft. Myers/Naples.............................. 1 4 5
Jacksonville.................................. 2 4 6(b)
Miami/Ft. Lauderdale.......................... 2 5 7
Orlando....................................... 2 4 6
Panama City................................... 1 4 5
Pensacola..................................... -- 2(c) 2
Tallahassee................................... 1 4 5
Tampa/St. Petersburg.......................... 3 5 8(b)
West Palm Beach............................... 3(c) 4 7
KENTUCKY
Louisville.................................... 3 5 8
LOUISIANA
New Orleans................................... 2 5 7
</TABLE>
116
<PAGE> 123
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AM FM
MARKET STATIONS STATIONS TOTAL
- ------ -------- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
MASSACHUSETTS
Springfield................................... 1 1 2
MICHIGAN
Grand Rapids.................................. 2 4 6
MISSISSIPPI
Jackson....................................... 2 2 4
NEW YORK
Albany........................................ 1(d) 3(d) 4
NORTH CAROLINA
Greensboro.................................... 2 2 4
Raleigh....................................... 1 4 5
OHIO
Cleveland..................................... 1 2 3(b)
Dayton........................................ 1 2 3(b)
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma City................................. 3(a) 4 7
Tulsa......................................... 2(a) 4(e) 6
PENNSYLVANIA
Allentown..................................... 1 1 2
Lancaster..................................... 1 1 2
Reading....................................... 1 1 2
RHODE ISLAND
Providence.................................... -- 2 2
SOUTH CAROLINA
Columbia...................................... 1 3 4
Greenville.................................... 1 3 4
TENNESSEE
Cookeville.................................... 2 2 4
Memphis....................................... 3 4 7
TEXAS
Austin........................................ 1 3 4
El Paso....................................... 2 3 5
Houston....................................... 3(f) 4(a) 7
San Antonio................................... 3(a) 4(a) 7
VIRGINIA
Norfolk....................................... -- 4 4
Richmond...................................... 3 3 6
WISCONSIN
Milwaukee..................................... 1 3 4
-- --- ---
Total............................... 66 135 201
== === ===
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) Includes one station programmed pursuant to a local marketing agreement.
Clear Channel does not own the FCC license.
(b) Includes one AM and one FM station in Jacksonville, Florida, two AM and four
FM stations in Tampa/St. Petersburg, Florida, one AM and two FM stations in
Cleveland,
117
<PAGE> 124
Ohio, and one AM and two FM stations in Dayton, Ohio, proposed to be
divested in connection with the merger.
(c) Includes one station for which Clear Channel sells airtime pursuant to a
joint sales agreement. Clear Channel does not own the FCC license.
(d) Stations owned by Radio Enterprises, Inc., in which Clear Channel owns an
80% interest.
(e) Includes two stations programmed pursuant to a local marketing agreement.
Clear Channel does not own the FCC licenses.
(f) Includes two stations that are owned by CCC-Houston AM, Ltd., in which Clear
Channel owns an 80% interest.
Clear Channel also owns the Kentucky News Network based in Louisville,
Kentucky, the Virginia News Network based in Richmond, Virginia, the Oklahoma
News Network based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, the Voice of Southwest
Agriculture Network based in San Angelo, Texas, the Clear Channel Sports Network
based both in College Station, Texas, and Des Moines, Iowa, the Alabama Radio
Network based in Birmingham, Alabama, the Tennessee Radio Network based in
Nashville, Tennessee, the University of Miami Sports Network based in Miami,
Florida, the Florida Radio Network based in Maitland, Florida, the University of
Florida Sports Network based in Gainesville, Florida and Orlando, Florida, and
the Penn State Sports Network based in West Palm Beach, Florida.
TELEVISION BROADCASTING
The following table sets forth certain selected information with regard to
each of Clear Channel's 18 television stations and two satellite stations that
it owned or programmed as of October 7, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NETWORK
MARKET AFFILIATION
- ------ -----------
<S> <C>
ALBANY/SCHENECTADY/TROY, NEW YORK
WXXA-TV..................................................... FOX
HARRISBURG/LEBANON/LANCASTER/YORK, PENNSYLVANIA
WHP-TV...................................................... CBS
WLYH-TV(a).................................................. UPN
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
WAWS-TV..................................................... FOX
WTEV-TV(a).................................................. UPN
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
KLRT-TV..................................................... FOX
KASN-TV(a).................................................. UPN
MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
WPTY-TV..................................................... ABC
WLMT-TV(a).................................................. UPN
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
WFTC-TV..................................................... FOX
MOBILE, ALABAMA/PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
WPMI-TV..................................................... NBC
WJTC-TV(a).................................................. UPN
PROVIDENCE/NEW BEDFORD, RHODE ISLAND
WPRI-TV..................................................... CBS
WNAC-TV(a).................................................. FOX
</TABLE>
118
<PAGE> 125
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NETWORK
MARKET AFFILIATION
- ------ -----------
<S> <C>
HOISINGTON, KANSAS
KBDK-TV(c)(d)............................................... n/a
TUCSON, ARIZONA
KTTU-TV(b).................................................. UPN
TULSA, OKLAHOMA
KOKI-TV..................................................... FOX
KTFO-TV(a).................................................. UPN
WICHITA, KANSAS
KSAS-TV..................................................... FOX
SALINA, KANSAS
KAAS-TV(c).................................................. FOX
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) Station programmed pursuant to a local marketing agreement. Clear Channel
does not own the FCC license.
(b) Station programmed by another party pursuant to a local marketing agreement.
(c) Satellite station of KSAS-TV in Wichita, Kansas.
(d) Clear Channel holds a construction permit for this station which is not yet
operating.
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
The following table sets forth certain selected information with regard to
each of Clear Channel's outdoor advertising display faces as of September 30,
1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
DISPLAY
MARKET FACES(A)
- ------ --------
<S> <C>
DOMESTIC
ARIZONA
Phoenix..................................................... 356
Tucson...................................................... 1,450
CALIFORNIA
Southern California(b)...................................... 12,248
North California(c)......................................... 5,142
DELAWARE
Wilmington.................................................. 1,085
FLORIDA
West Coast(d)............................................... 2,006
Atlantic Coast.............................................. 739
Orlando..................................................... 1,968
Jacksonville................................................ 1,148
Gulf Coast.................................................. 619
Miami....................................................... 1,980
Ocala....................................................... 1,001
GEORGIA
Atlanta..................................................... 2,088
ILLINOIS
Chicago..................................................... 7,284
INDIANA
Indianapolis................................................ 1,385
</TABLE>
119
<PAGE> 126
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
DISPLAY
MARKET FACES(A)
- ------ --------
<S> <C>
IOWA
Des Moines.................................................. 646
MARYLAND
Baltimore................................................... 1,415
Salisbury................................................... 941
Washington.................................................. 669
MINNESOTA
Minneapolis................................................. 1,735
NEW YORK
Yonkers..................................................... 711
Hudson Valley............................................... 401
OHIO
Northeastern Ohio........................................... 2,264
PENNSYLVANIA
Philadelphia................................................ 2,659
SOUTH CAROLINA
Myrtle Beach................................................ 1,234
TENNESSEE
Chattanooga................................................. 1,457
Memphis..................................................... 2,513
TEXAS
Dallas...................................................... 4,771
San Antonio................................................. 3,451
Houston..................................................... 5,135
El Paso..................................................... 1,297
WISCONSIN
Milwaukee................................................... 1,666
OTHER OUT-OF-HOME
Various..................................................... 9,750
UNION PACIFIC SOUTHERN PACIFIC(F)
Various..................................................... 5,783
INTERNATIONAL
Great Britain............................................... 42,693
Ireland..................................................... 4,875
Belgium..................................................... 3,230
France...................................................... 4,446
Taiwan...................................................... 450
Nordic...................................................... 45,552
Canada...................................................... 55
Small Transit Displays(g)................................... 83,832
-------
Total............................................. 274,130
=======
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(a) Domestic display faces primarily include 20*x60* bulletins, 14*x48*
bulletins, 12*x25* Premier Panels(TM), 25*x25* Premier Plus Panels(TM),
12*x25* 30-sheet posters, 6*x12* 8-sheet posters, and various transit
displays. International display faces include street furniture, various
transit displays and billboards of various sizes.
120
<PAGE> 127
(b) Includes Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and
Ventura counties.
(c) Includes San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Santa Cruz, Sacramento and Solano
counties.
(d) Includes Tampa, Sarasota and Bradenton.
(e) Includes Cleveland, Akron and Canton.
(f) Represents licenses managed under Union Pacific Southern Pacific License
Management Agreement.
(g) Represents small display faces on the interior and exterior of various
public transportation vehicles.
MATERIAL ACQUISITIONS
Since December 31, 1997, Clear Channel has acquired all of the outstanding
stock of More Group Plc., an outdoor advertising company organized under the
laws of the United Kingdom. This acquisition increased Clear Channel's holdings
of outdoor advertising assets by approximately 90,000 outdoor advertising
display faces in 22 countries. Clear Channel acquired all of the outstanding
stock of More Group in multiple closings and finalized the acquisition on August
6, 1998.
In addition, Clear Channel closed its merger with Universal Outdoor
Holdings, Inc. on April 1, 1998, adding approximately 34,000 outdoor advertising
display faces in 23 major U.S. metropolitan markets.
Officers of Clear Channel have indicated in published reports that Clear
Channel is exploring whether to make an offer to acquire Chancellor Media Corp.
These statements were published following an announcement by Chancellor that it
had retained an investment banking firm to explore various options aimed at
increasing shareholder value. No assurances can be made that Clear Channel will
make any determination to pursue a transaction with Chancellor.
121
<PAGE> 128
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF JACOR COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth, as of February 22, 1999, the number of
shares and percentage of Jacor common stock beneficially owned by each person
who Jacor knows to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of Jacor common
stock, by Jacor's directors, by Jacor's five most highly compensated executive
officers in 1997, and by all of Jacor's executive officers and directors as a
group. No agreements, formal or informal, exist among the various officers and
directors to vote their shares collectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AGGREGATE
NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRABLE PERCENT
BENEFICIALLY WITHIN OF
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNED(1) 60 DAYS(1)(2) CLASS(2)
------------------------ ------------ ------------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
5% OR MORE BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Zell/Chilmark Fund L.P............... 13,349,720(3) 25.9%
Two North Riverside Plaza
Suite 600
Chicago, Illinois 60606
David M. Schulte..................... 13,349,720(3) 25.9%
875 N. Michigan Avenue
Suite 2200
Chicago, Illinois 60611
Massachusetts Financial Services
Company............................ 6,339,899(4) 12.3%
500 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116-3741
Janus Capital Corporation............ 3,236,605(4) 6.3%
100 Fillmore Street
Denver, Colorado 80206-4923
FMR Corp. and related reporting
persons............................ 2,676,869(4) 5.2%
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc........ 2,609,600(4) 5.1%
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
John W. Alexander.................... 42,279 15,841 *
Peter C.B. Bynoe..................... 5,539 6,841 *
Rod F. Dammeyer...................... 13,352,003(3) 8,841 25.9%
F. Philip Handy...................... 59,879 15,841 *
Marc Lasry........................... 40,874 5,591 *
Robert L. Lawrence................... 9,974 633,343 1.2%
Randy Michaels....................... 258,703(5) 947,665 2.3%
Sheli Z. Rosenberg................... 13,800,407(3) 76,084 26.9%
Mary Agnes Wilderotter............... 1,953 5,092 *
Samuel Zell.......................... 13,793,137(3) 67,084 26.9%
David H. Crowl....................... 999 94,276 *
John E. Hogan........................ 3,958 62,160 *
R. Christopher Weber................. 251,795(5) 332,315 1.1%
All executive officers and directors
as a group (23 persons)............ 14,260,583(5)(6) 2,231,671 30.7%
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
* Less than 1%
(1) The number of shares indicated are individually or jointly owned, or are
shares over which the individual has sole or shared voting or investment
power. Certain of Jacor's directors and executive officers disclaim
beneficial ownership of some of the shares shown that are held in the name
of family members, trusts and affiliated companies, as follows:
- Mr. Handy -- 100 shares held by his wife;
- Mr. Michaels -- 15 shares held by his wife; and
122
<PAGE> 129
- Mrs. Rosenberg and Mr. Zell -- 60,243 shares issuable upon the exercise
of warrants held by SZ2 (IGP) Limited Partnership, whose partners include
Mrs. Rosenberg and certain trusts created for the benefit of Mr. Zell,
and 437,858 shares beneficially owned by Samstock, L.L.C., whose indirect
members include certain trusts created for the benefit of Mr. Zell and
for which Mrs. Rosenberg is the trustee and a corporation whose sole
stockholder is a trust in which Mr. Zell is both the trustee and
beneficiary.
(2) Includes any securities not outstanding that are subject to options,
warrants or other rights exercisable within 60 days of February 22, 1999.
These securities are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing
the percentage of the class owned by such person but are not deemed to be
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class owned
by any other person.
(3) All shares beneficially owned by Zell/Chilmark are included in the shares
beneficially owned by Messrs. Zell, Schulte and Dammeyer and Mrs.
Rosenberg. Zell/Chilmark is a Delaware limited partnership controlled by
Mr. Zell, Chairman of the Board of Jacor, and Mr. Schulte, a former
director of Jacor. The sole general partner of Zell/Chilmark is ZC Limited
Partnership; the sole general partner of ZC Limited is ZC Partnership; the
sole general partners of ZC Partnership are ZC, Inc. and CZ Inc.; Mr. Zell
is the sole stockholder of ZC, Inc.; and Mr. Schulte is the sole
stockholder of CZ Inc. Messrs. Zell and Dammeyer indirectly share
beneficial ownership of an 80% limited partnership interest in ZC Limited;
Mr. Schulte indirectly shares beneficial ownership of a 20% limited
partnership interest in ZC Limited; and Messrs. Zell, Schulte and Dammeyer
and Mrs. Rosenberg constitute all of the members of the management
committee of ZC Limited.
(4) Based on the most recent Schedule 13G filed by these entities with the SEC
and which are publicly available from the SEC's EDGAR database. Detailed
information about the manner in which these entities beneficially own
shares of Jacor common stock is contained in those filings.
(5) Includes 238,269 shares held under the Jacor Communications, Inc.
Retirement Plan, of which Messrs. Michaels and Weber, as co-trustees, share
voting and investment power. Of these 238,269 shares, 8,407 shares are
beneficially owned by Jacor's five most highly compensated executive
officers.
(6) Does not include an aggregate of 12,155 outstanding stock units granted in
1996 and 1997 to Jacor's non-employee directors. Also does not include
6,648 stock units granted in 1998 to Jacor's non-employee directors of
which 3,324 are vested. These stock units are convertible into Jacor common
stock at times established by each director in advance of the award date,
generally the earlier of when such individual no longer serves as a Jacor
director and/or when Jacor common stock exceeds a designated price for a
specified time period. Also does not include an aggregate of 22,487
outstanding stock units granted in 1996 to certain executive officers of
Jacor including 9,569 stock units to each of Messrs. Michaels and Lawrence.
These units are convertible into Jacor common stock at the earlier of the
executive officer's retirement, death, permanent disability or separation
from service or upon a change in control of Jacor.
123
<PAGE> 130
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLEAR CHANNEL COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth, as of February 22, 1999, the number of
shares and percentage of Clear Channel common stock beneficially owned by Clear
Channel's directors, Clear Channel's chief executive officer, the four most
highly compensated other executive officers of Clear Channel, the Clear Channel
directors and executive officers as a group, and each person known to Clear
Channel to beneficially own more than 5% of the Clear Channel common stock
outstanding. Except as otherwise noted, each shareholder has sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AGGREGATE
NUMBER
OF SHARES ACQUIRABLE PERCENTAGE
BENEFICIALLY WITHIN 60 OF SHARES
NAME OWNED(1) DAYS(2) OUTSTANDING(3)
---- ------------ ---------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
L. Lowry Mays............................ 29,370,275 995,000 11.4%
Karl Eller............................... -- 3,951,050(4) 1.5%
Mark P. Mays............................. 942,961 22,224 *
Alan D. Feld............................. 16,000(5) 114,500 *
B. J. McCombs............................ 16,549,920(6) 12,000 6.2%
Theodore H. Strauss...................... 163,444 114,500 *
John H. Williams......................... 32,800 10,000 *
Scott Eller.............................. -- 1,902,938(4) *
Randall T. Mays.......................... 568,728 22,224 *
Putnam Investments(7).................... 21,872,334 -- 8.3%
FMR Corp. ............................... 16,156,548 -- 6.1%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a
Group (13 persons)..................... 47,787,378 5,241,498 19.7%
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
* Represents less than 1% of the Company's common stock.
(1) The number of shares shown includes shares that are individually owned, as
well as shares over which certain individuals have either sole or shared
investment or voting authority as follows:
- Mr. L. Mays -- 100,056 shares held by trusts of which Mr. L. Mays is
trustee, 218,570 shares held by the Mays Family Foundation, and
20,000,000 shares held by 4-M Partners, Ltd.
- Mr. M. Mays -- 85,976 shares held by trusts of which Mr. M. Mays is
trustee and 43,696 shares owned by Mr. M. Mays' minor child.
- Mr. McCombs -- 3,000,000 shares held by the McCombs Family 1998
Charitable Lead Trust.
- Mr. R. Mays -- 9,552 shares held by trusts of which Mr. R. Mays is
trustee.
(2) Reflects the number of shares that could be purchased by exercise of options
or put rights available at February 22, 1999 or within 60 days thereafter
under Clear Channel's stock option plans and stockholders agreements.
(3) Based on the number of shares outstanding at, or acquirable within 60 days
of, February 22, 1999.
(4) Includes 1,902,938 shares subject to a put right pursuant to a stockholders
agreement between Clear Channel and EM Holdings LLC.
(5) Does not include 61,630 shares owned by Mr. Feld's wife, as to which Mr.
Feld disclaims beneficial ownership.
(6) Does not include 6,153,452 shares held by trusts of which Mr. McCombs'
children are trustees, as to which Mr. McCombs disclaims beneficial
ownership.
(7) Address: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
(8) Address: 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
124
<PAGE> 131
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Clear Channel at December 31, 1997
and 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997,
incorporated by reference and the financial statement schedule incorporated by
reference and included in Clear Channel's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1997, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP,
independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon incorporated by
reference elsewhere herein which, as to the years 1996 and 1997, are based in
part on the reports of KPMG and KPMG LLP, respectively, independent auditors.
The financial statements referred to above are incorporated herein by reference
in reliance upon such reports given upon the authority of such firms as experts
in accounting and auditing.
The 1996 consolidated financial statements of Australian Radio Network Pty.
Ltd. not separately presented in Clear Channel's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, have been audited by KPMG, independent
auditors, as set forth in their report dated March 4, 1997 included in Clear
Channel's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and
incorporated herein by reference. Such report referred to above is incorporated
herein by reference in reliance upon the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Heftel Broadcasting Corporation
and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997 (not separately
presented in Clear Channel's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997), are incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon
the report of KPMG LLP, independent certified public accountants, and upon the
authority of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements incorporated in this Joint Proxy
Statement/ Prospectus by reference to the audited financial statements of
Universal Outdoor Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, included in Clear
Channel's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 12, 1998, as amended by Form
8-K/A filed on March 23, 1998, have been so incorporated in reliance on the
report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The financial statements incorporated in this Prospectus by reference to
the audited historical financial statements of Paxson Radio (a division of
Paxson Communications Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 1996 included
in Clear Channel's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 1997 have been
so incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
independent accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Eller Media as of December 31,
1996 and 1995 and for the year ended December 31, 1996 and for the period from
August 18, 1995 through December 31, 1995, together with the consolidated
financial statements of PMG Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries and the combined
financial statements of Eller Investment Company, Inc. for the period from
January 1, 1995 to August 17, 1995, incorporated by reference in this Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus and elsewhere in the Registration Statement are
included in Clear Channel's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 1997,
have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as
125
<PAGE> 132
indicated in their report with respect thereto, and are incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in
giving said reports.
The combined financial statements of Eller Investment Company, Inc. as of
and for the year ended December 31, 1994, incorporated by reference in this
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and elsewhere in the Registration Statement are
included in Clear Channel's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 17, 1997,
have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as
indicated in their report with respect thereto and are incorporated by reference
herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in giving said
reports.
The consolidated financial statements of More Group Plc. as of December 31,
1997 and for the year ended December 31, 1997, included in Clear Channel's
Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated September 4, 1998, have been audited by Price
Waterhouse Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors, London, England and
are incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon the report of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated balance sheets of Jacor Communications, Inc. and its
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997; the combined balance sheets of Talk Radio
Network, Inc. and Chancellor Broadcasting Co., Inc. as of September 30, 1997,
the combined balance sheets of Talk Radio Network, Inc., Chancellor Broadcasting
Co., Inc. and Broadcast Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
and the related combined statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995; the balance sheets of Tsunami Communications, Inc.
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1997; and the balance sheets of M3X, Inc. as of April 30,
1998 and July 31, 1997 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the nine months ended April 30, 1998 and for the years
ended July 31, 1997 and 1996; incorporated by reference in this Joint Proxy
Statement/ Prospectus, have been incorporated herein in reliance on the reports
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, given on the authority
of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of Nationwide Communications as of
December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996, and for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997, appearing in Jacor's Current Report
on Form 8-K/A dated October 23, 1997, as amended, have been audited by KPMG LLP,
independent certified public accountants, as set forth in their report thereon
included therein and incorporated herein by reference. Such combined financial
statements are incorporated by reference in reliance upon such report given upon
the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
LEGAL OPINIONS
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. will pass upon certain legal
matters relating to the validity of the shares of Clear Channel common stock to
be issued in the merger. In addition, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton and
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. will issue tax opinions to Jacor and
Clear Channel, respectively, in connection with the merger agreement. Alan D.
Feld, the sole shareholder of a professional corporation which is a partner of
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., is a director
126
<PAGE> 133
of Clear Channel and owns approximately 181,000 shares of Clear Channel common
stock (including presently exercisable options to acquire approximately 105,000
shares).
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Jacor and Clear Channel file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
reports, statements or other information we file at the SEC's public reference
rooms in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-8330 for further information on the public reference room.
Our SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document
retrieval services and at the web site maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
Clear Channel filed a registration statement on Form S-4 to register with
the SEC the Clear Channel common stock which Clear Channel will issue to the
Jacor stockholders in the merger. This document is part of that registration
statement and constitutes a prospectus of Clear Channel in addition to being a
proxy statement for Clear Channel and Jacor for their stockholders' meetings. As
allowed by SEC rules, this document does not contain all of the information you
can find in the registration statement or the exhibits to the registration
statement.
The SEC allows Clear Channel and Jacor to incorporate by reference
information into this document, which means that Clear Channel and Jacor can
disclose important information to you by referring to another document filed
separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to
be part of this document, except for any information superseded by information
in this document.
This document incorporates by reference the documents set forth below:
Clear Channel SEC Filings:
1. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1997
2. Definitive 14A Proxy Statement filed March 26, 1998.
3. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998
4. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998
5. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1998
6. Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 10, 1998, as amended by
Form 8-K/A filed February 23, 1999
7. Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 9, 1998
8. Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 11, 1998
9. Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 28, 1998
10. Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 10, 1998, as amended by Form
8-K/A filed September 4, 1998, Form 8-K/A filed January 14, 1999
and Form 8-K/A filed February 23, 1999
11. Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 10, 1998
12. Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 12, 1998, as amended by
Form 8-K/A filed March 23, 1998 and Form 8-K/A filed February 23,
1999
13. Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 1997, as amended by
Form 8-K/A filed February 23, 1999
14. Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 17, 1997
Jacor SEC Filings:
1. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1997, as amended by Form 10-K/A filed May 4, 1998 and Form 10-K/A
filed February 23, 1999
2. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998
3. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998
127
<PAGE> 134
4. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1998, as amended by Form 10-Q/A filed February 23, 1999
5. Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 4, 1997
6. Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 1998, as amended by
Form 8-K/A filed January 21, 1998, Form 8-K/A filed April 30,
1998, Form 8-K/A filed August 14, 1998 and Form 8-K/A filed
February 23, 1999
7. Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 4, 1998, as amended by
Form 8-K/A filed February 20, 1998
8. Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 15, 1998
9. Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 9, 1998
Clear Channel and Jacor are also incorporating by reference additional
documents that they file with the SEC between the date of this document and the
date of the stockholders' meetings.
If you are a stockholder of Clear Channel or Jacor, we may have sent you
some of the documents listed above, but you can obtain any of them from us or
the SEC. Documents listed above are available from us without charge, excluding
all exhibits unless the exhibits have specifically been incorporated by
reference in this document. Stockholders may obtain documents listed above by
requesting them in writing from the appropriate company at the following
address:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Clear Channel Communications, Inc. Jacor Communications, Inc.
200 Concord Plaza, Suite 600 50 East RiverCenter Blvd., 12th
San Antonio, Texas 78216 Floor
Attn: Office of Investor Relations Covington, Kentucky 41011
Tel: (210) 822-2828 Attn: Corporate Communications and
Investor Relations
Tel: (606) 655-2267
</TABLE>
If you would like to request documents from us, please do so by March 15,
1999, so that you may receive them before the stockholders' meetings. You should
rely only on the information contained in this document to vote on the proposals
submitted by the Clear Channel and Jacor Boards. We have not authorized anyone
to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this
document. This document is dated February 23, 1999. You should not assume that
the information contained in this document is accurate as of any date other than
such date, and neither the mailing of this document to stockholders of Clear
Channel and Jacor nor the issuance of Clear Channel common stock in the merger
shall create any implication to the contrary.
YOU ARE URGED TO SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE
ENCLOSED PREPAID ENVELOPE. PROMPT RETURN OF YOUR PROXY MAY SAVE JACOR AND CLEAR
CHANNEL ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION EXPENSE.
WE ENCOURAGE ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF JACOR AND CLEAR CHANNEL TO ATTEND THE
SPECIAL STOCKHOLDERS' MEETINGS ON MARCH 26, 1999.
128
<PAGE> 135
LIST OF ANNEXES
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
ANNEX A Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended
ANNEX B Mays Voting Agreement
ANNEX C Form of Zell Voting Agreements
ANNEX D Registration Rights Agreement
ANNEX E Opinion of Salomon Smith Barney Inc.
Opinion of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities
ANNEX F Corporation
</TABLE>
129
<PAGE> 136
ANNEX A
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AMONG
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
CCU MERGER SUB, INC.
AND
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
DATED AS OF OCTOBER 8, 1998
<PAGE> 137
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I.
THE MERGER
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Section 1.1. The Merger..................................... A-1
Section 1.2. Closing........................................ A-1
Section 1.3. Effective Time................................. A-2
Section 1.4. Effects of the Merger.......................... A-2
Section 1.5. Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the
Surviving Corporation..................................... A-2
Section 1.6. Directors...................................... A-2
Section 1.7. Officers....................................... A-2
ARTICLE II.
EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE
CONSTITUENT CORPORATIONS; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
Section 2.1. Capital Stock of Merger Sub.................... A-2
Section 2.2. Cancellation of Treasury Stock and Parent Owned
Stock..................................................... A-2
Section 2.3. Conversion of Company Common Stock and
Warrants.................................................. A-2
Section 2.4. Exchange of Certificates....................... A-3
Section 2.5. Stock Transfer Books........................... A-5
ARTICLE III.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTS OF THE COMPANY
Section 3.1. Organization, Qualification, Etc. ............. A-6
Section 3.2. Capital Stock.................................. A-6
Section 3.3. Corporate Authority Relative to this Agreement.
No Violation.............................................. A-7
Section 3.4. Reports and Financial Statements............... A-8
Section 3.5. No Undisclosed Liabilities..................... A-8
Section 3.6. No Violation of Law............................ A-8
Section 3.7. Environmental Laws and Regulations............. A-9
Section 3.8. No Undisclosed Employee Benefit Plan
Liabilities or Severance Arrangements..................... A-9
Section 3.9. Absence of Certain Changes or Events........... A-10
Section 3.10. Investigations; Litigation.................... A-10
Section 3.11. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement;
Other Information......................................... A-10
Section 3.12. Lack of Ownership of Parent Common Stock...... A-10
Section 3.13. Tax Matters................................... A-10
Section 3.14. Opinion of Financial Advisor.................. A-11
Section 3.15. Required Vote of the Company Stockholders..... A-11
Section 3.16. Insurance..................................... A-11
Section 3.17. Real Property; Title.......................... A-11
Section 3.18. Collective Bargaining Agreements and Labor.... A-11
Section 3.19. Material Contracts............................ A-12
Section 3.20. Takeover Statute.............................. A-12
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE> 138
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ARTICLE IV.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Section 4.1. Organization, Qualification, Etc. ............. A-12
Section 4.2. Capital Stock.................................. A-12
Section 4.3. Corporate Authority Relative to this Agreement.
No Violation.............................................. A-13
Section 4.4. Reports and Financial Statements............... A-14
Section 4.5. No Undisclosed Liabilities..................... A-14
Section 4.6. No Violation of Law............................ A-14
Section 4.7. Environmental Laws and Regulations............. A-14
Section 4.8. No Undisclosed Employee Benefit Plan
Liabilities or Severance Arrangements..................... A-14
Section 4.9. Absence of Certain Changes or Events........... A-15
Section 4.10. Investigations; Litigation.................... A-15
Section 4.11. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement;
Other Information......................................... A-15
Section 4.12. Lack of Ownership of Company Common Stock..... A-15
Section 4.13. Tax Matters................................... A-15
Section 4.14. Required Vote of Parent Stockholders.......... A-16
Section 4.15. Opinion of Financial Advisor.................. A-16
Section 4.16. Insurance..................................... A-16
Section 4.17. Real Property; Title.......................... A-16
Section 4.18. Collective Bargaining Agreements and Labor.... A-16
Section 4.19. Material Contracts............................ A-16
ARTICLE V.
COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
Section 5.1. Conduct of Business by the Company or Parent... A-17
Section 5.2. Proxy Material; Registration Statement......... A-19
Section 5.3. Stockholders' Meeting.......................... A-20
Section 5.4. Approvals and Consents; Cooperation............ A-20
Section 5.5. Access to Information; Confidentiality......... A-20
Section 5.6. Affiliates..................................... A-21
Section 5.7. Rights Under Stock Plans....................... A-21
Section 5.8. Filings; Other Action.......................... A-22
Section 5.9. Further Assurances............................. A-23
Section 5.10. No Inconsistent Activities.................... A-23
Section 5.11. Director and Officer Liability................ A-24
Section 5.12. Accountants' "Comfort" Letters................ A-25
Section 5.13. Additional Reports............................ A-25
Section 5.14. Plan of Reorganization........................ A-26
Section 5.15. Conveyance Taxes.............................. A-26
Section 5.16. Public Announcements.......................... A-26
Section 5.17. Employee Plans and Benefits and Employment
Contracts................................................. A-26
ARTICLE VI.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
Section 6.1. Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.... A-27
Section 6.2. Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and
Merger Sub................................................ A-28
Section 6.3. Conditions to the Obligations of the Company... A-28
</TABLE>
ii
<PAGE> 139
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ARTICLE VII.
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
Section 7.1. Termination.................................... A-29
Section 7.2. Effect of Termination.......................... A-30
Section 7.3. Amendment...................................... A-30
Section 7.4. Extension; Waiver.............................. A-30
Section 7.5. Termination Fee................................ A-30
Section 7.6. Procedure for Termination, Amendment, Extension
or Waiver................................................. A-31
ARTICLE VIII.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 8.1. Nonsurvival of Representations................. A-31
Section 8.2. Notices........................................ A-31
Section 8.3. Definitions.................................... A-32
Section 8.4. Counterparts................................... A-33
Section 8.5. Entire Agreement; No Third-Party
Beneficiaries............................................. A-33
Section 8.6. Assignment..................................... A-33
Section 8.7. Governing Law.................................. A-33
Section 8.8. Enforcement.................................... A-33
Section 8.9. Severability................................... A-33
Section 8.10. Interpretation................................ A-34
Section 8.11. Finders or Brokers............................ A-34
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBITS
- --------
<C> <S>
A Form of Company Tax Opinion Representation Letter
B Form of Parent Tax Opinion Representation Letter
</TABLE>
iii
<PAGE> 140
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of October 8, 1998, is entered
into by and among CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Texas corporation
("Parent"), CCU MERGER SUB, INC., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of Parent, Merger Sub and the
Company have approved the acquisition of the Company by Parent upon the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and Plan of Merger,
including, without limitation, the exhibits attached hereto (collectively, this
"Agreement");
WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of Parent, Merger Sub and the
Company have determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of their
respective shareholders for Merger Sub to merge with and into the Company as set
forth below (the "Merger") upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement, whereby each issued and outstanding share of common
stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company ("Company Common Stock"), other
than shares owned directly or indirectly by Parent, Merger Sub or by the
Company, will be converted into shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per
share, of Parent ("Parent Common Stock") in accordance with the provisions of
Article II of this Agreement;
WHEREAS, as a condition and inducement to Parent's and the Company's
willingness to enter into this Agreement, concurrently with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement, (i) Parent and certain stockholders of the Company
(the "Voting Stockholders") are entering into voting agreements dated as of the
date of this Agreement (collectively, the "Fund Voting Agreement") pursuant to
which such stockholders agree to vote their shares of Company Common Stock in
favor of the proposal to approve and adopt the Merger and this Agreement and
(ii) the Company and certain stockholders of Parent are entering into a Voting
Agreement dated as of the date of this Agreement (the "Parent Stockholders
Voting Agreement") pursuant to which such stockholders agree to vote their
shares of Parent Common Stock in favor of the proposal to approve the issuance
of Parent Common Stock in the Merger;
WHEREAS, for federal income tax purposes, the Merger is intended to qualify
as a reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the United States
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); and
WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company desire to make certain
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the
Merger and also to prescribe certain conditions to the Merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants
and agreements herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby,
Parent, Merger Sub and the Company hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I.
THE MERGER
SECTION 1.1. The Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement and the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL"),
Merger Sub shall be merged with and into the Company at the Effective Time (as
defined in Section 1.3) of the Merger. Following the Merger, the separate
corporate existence of Merger Sub shall cease, and the Company shall continue as
the surviving corporation (the "Surviving Corporation") and shall succeed to and
assume all the rights and obligations of Merger Sub in accordance with the DGCL.
SECTION 1.2. Closing. The closing of the Merger shall take place at 10:00
a.m. on a date to be specified by the parties which shall be no later than the
second business day after the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth
in Article VI (the "Closing Date") at such place as the parties may mutually
agree.
A-1
<PAGE> 141
SECTION 1.3. Effective Time. On the Closing Date, the parties shall execute
and file in the office of the Secretary of State of Delaware a certificate of
merger (a "Certificate of Merger") executed in accordance with the DGCL and
shall make all other filings or recordings, and take such other and further
action as may be required under the DGCL. The Merger shall become effective at
the time of filing of the Certificate of Merger, or at such later time as is
agreed upon by the parties hereto and set forth therein (such time as the Merger
becomes effective is referred to herein as the "Effective Time").
SECTION 1.4. Effects of the Merger. The Merger shall have the effects set
forth in the DGCL.
SECTION 1.5. Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Surviving
Corporation.
(a) The Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall become the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation after the Effective Time, and
thereafter may be amended as provided therein and as permitted by law and this
Agreement.
(b) The By-Laws of the Merger Sub as in effect immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall become the By-Laws of the Surviving Corporation after the
Effective Time, and thereafter may be amended as provided therein and as
permitted by law and this Agreement.
SECTION 1.6. Directors. The directors of the Merger Sub immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall become the directors of the Surviving Corporation,
until the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective
successors are duly elected and qualified, as the case may be.
SECTION 1.7. Officers. The officers of the Company immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall become the officers of the Surviving Corporation, until the
earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors are
duly elected and qualified, as the case may be.
ARTICLE II.
EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE
CONSTITUENT CORPORATIONS; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
SECTION 2.1. Capital Stock of Merger Sub. As of the Effective Time, by
virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any
shares of Company Common Stock or any shares of capital stock of Merger Sub,
each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Merger Sub issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into and
become one fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock, par value $0.01
per share, of the Surviving Corporation.
SECTION 2.2. Cancellation of Treasury Stock and Parent Owned Stock. As of
the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part
of the holder of any shares of Company Common Stock or any shares of capital
stock of Merger Sub, each share of Company Common Stock issued and held,
immediately prior to the Effective Time, in the Company's treasury or by any of
the Company's direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, and each share of
Company Common Stock that is owned by Parent, Merger Sub or any other subsidiary
of Parent, shall automatically be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist,
and no consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor.
SECTION 2.3. Conversion of Company Common Stock and Warrants. (a) As of the
Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of
the holder of any shares of Company Common Stock or any shares of capital stock
of Merger Sub, subject to this Section 2.3 and Section 2.4(f), each share of
Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective
Time (other than shares to be canceled in accordance with Section 2.2 (the
"Canceled Shares")) shall be converted into a number (the "Conversion Number")
of duly authorized, validly issued and nonassessable shares of Parent Common
Stock (the "Merger Consideration") in accordance with the following:
(i) If the Average Closing Price (as defined in Section 2.3(b) hereof)
is less than or equal to $42.86, the Conversion Number will be 1.4 shares
of Parent Common Stock,
A-2
<PAGE> 142
(ii) If the Average Closing Price is greater than $42.86 and less than
or equal to $44.44, the Conversion Number will be that number of shares of
Parent Common Stock with a value of $60.00, when measured at the Average
Closing Price,
(iii) If the Average Closing Price is greater than $44.44 and less
than $50.00, the Conversion Number will be 1.35 shares of Parent Common
Stock, and
(iv) If the Average Closing Price is greater than or equal to $50.00,
the Conversion Number will be the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the sum
of (x) $67.50 plus (y) the result obtained by multiplying $.675 times the
excess of the Average Closing Price over $50.00 by (B) the Average Closing
Price;
provided, however, that, in any event, if between the date of this Agreement and
the Effective Time, the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock shall have
been changed into a different number of shares or a different class, by reason
of any declared or completed stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification,
recapitalization, split, combination or exchange of shares, the Conversion
Number and the Walk-Away Price (as defined in Section 7.1(j) hereof) shall be
correspondingly adjusted to the extent appropriate to reflect such stock
dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split, combination or
exchange of shares. As of the Effective Time, all such shares of Company Common
Stock shall no longer be outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and
retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder of a certificate or a
certificate which immediately prior to the Effective Time represented
outstanding shares of Company Common Stock shall cease to have any rights with
respect thereto, except the right to receive the Merger Consideration.
(b) "Average Closing Price" means the average of the closing prices for a
share of Parent Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
("NYSE") Composite Transaction Tape (as reported in The Wall Street Journal or,
if not reported thereby, any other authoritative source) for the twenty-five
(25) consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day prior to the
Closing Date.
(c) The Company represents and warrants that the holders of the Company
Common Stock are not entitled to appraisal rights under the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company.
(d) Company Warrants. Each holder of a warrant to purchase Company Common
Stock ("Company Warrant") issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall have the right after the Effective Time, upon payment of
the exercise price of such Company Warrant that was in effect immediately prior
to the Effective Time as adjusted pursuant to the Warrant Agreements (as defined
in Section 8.3 hereof), to receive, upon the exercise of each Company Warrant,
the Merger Consideration which such holder would have received as a result of
the Merger had such Company Warrant been exercised immediately prior to the
Effective Time and converted in the Merger into the Merger Consideration.
SECTION 2.4. Exchange of Certificates.
(a) Exchange Agent. From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall deliver
to a bank or trust company designated by Parent and reasonably satisfactory to
the Company (the "Exchange Agent"), for the benefit of the holders of shares of
Company Common Stock for exchange in accordance with this Article II, through
the Exchange Agent, certificates evidencing such number of shares of Parent
Common Stock issuable to holders of Company Common Stock in the Merger pursuant
to Section 2.3 and cash in an amount required to be paid pursuant to Sections
2.4(d) and 2.4(f) (such certificates for shares of Parent Common Stock, together
with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto and cash, being
hereinafter referred to as the "Exchange Fund"). The Exchange Agent shall,
pursuant to irrevocable instructions, deliver, out of the Exchange Fund, to
holders of Company Common Stock the Parent Common Stock contemplated to be
issued pursuant to Section 2.3 (and any dividends or other distributions to
which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(d)) and the cash in lieu
of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to which such holders are entitled
to pursuant to Section 2.4(f) hereof out of the Exchange Fund. Except as
contemplated by Section 2.4(g) hereof, the Exchange Fund shall not be used for
any other purpose.
(b) Exchange Procedures. As promptly as practicable after the Effective
Time, Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of a
certificate or certificates (the "Certificates") which immediately prior to the
Effective Time represented outstanding shares of Company Common Stock (other
than Canceled
A-3
<PAGE> 143
Shares) (i) a letter of transmittal (which shall be in customary form and shall
specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the
Certificates shall pass, only upon proper delivery of the Certificates to the
Exchange Agent) and (ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the
Certificates in exchange for certificates evidencing shares of Parent Common
Stock, or cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to which such
holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(f) hereof.
(c) Exchange of Certificates. Upon surrender to the Exchange Agent of a
Certificate for cancellation, together with such letter of transmittal, duly
executed and completed in accordance with the instructions thereto, and such
other documents as may be reasonably required pursuant to such instructions, the
holder of such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor a
certificate representing that number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock
which such holder's shares of Company Common Stock have been converted into
pursuant to this Article II (and any cash in lieu of any fractional shares of
Parent Common Stock to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(f)
and any dividends or other distributions to which such holder is entitled
pursuant to Section 2.4(d)), and the Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith
be canceled. In the event of a transfer of ownership of shares of Company Common
Stock which is not registered in the transfer records of the Company, shares of
Parent Common Stock, cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Parent Common
Stock to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(f) and any
dividends or other distributions to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.4(d) may be issued to a transferee if the Certificate representing
such shares of Company Common Stock is presented to the Exchange Agent,
accompanied by all documents required to evidence and effect such transfer and
by evidence that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid. Until
surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.4, each Certificate shall be
deemed at all times after the Effective Time to represent only the right to
receive upon such surrender the number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock
into which the shares of Company Common Stock formerly represented thereby have
been converted, cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to
which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(f) and any dividends or
other distributions to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(d).
(d) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares of Parent Common
Stock. No dividends or other distributions declared or made after the Effective
Time with respect to Parent Common Stock with a record date after the Effective
Time shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered Certificate with respect
to the shares of Parent Common Stock represented thereby, and no cash payment in
lieu of any fractional shares shall be paid to any such holder pursuant to
Section 2.4(f), until the holder of such Certificate shall surrender such
Certificate. Subject to the effect of escheat, tax or other applicable laws,
following surrender of any such Certificate, there shall be paid to the holder
of the certificates representing whole shares of Parent Common Stock issued in
exchange therefor, without interest, (i) promptly, the amount of any cash
payable with respect to a fractional share of Parent Common Stock to which such
holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(f) and the amount of dividends or
other distributions with a record date after the Effective Time and theretofore
paid with respect to such whole shares of Parent Common Stock, and (ii) at the
appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other distributions, with a
record date after the Effective Time but prior to surrender and a payment date
occurring after surrender, payable with respect to such whole shares of Parent
Common Stock.
(e) No Further Rights in Company Common Stock. All shares of Parent Common
Stock issued upon conversion of the shares of Company Common Stock in accordance
with the terms hereof (including any cash paid pursuant to Section 2.4(d) or
(f)) shall be deemed to have been issued in full satisfaction of all rights
pertaining to such shares of Company Common Stock.
(f) No Fractional Shares.
(i) No certificates or scrip representing fractional shares of Parent
Common Stock shall be issued upon the surrender for exchange of
Certificates, no dividend or distribution of Parent shall relate to such
fractional share interests and such fractional share interests will not
entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any rights of a stockholder of
Parent.
(ii) In lieu of the issuance of fractional shares, each holder of
Company Common Stock shall be entitled to receive an amount in cash equal
to the product obtained by multiplying (A) the fractional share interest to
which such holder (after taking into account all shares of Company Common
Stock held
A-4
<PAGE> 144
at the Effective Time by such holder) would otherwise be entitled by (B)
the closing price for a share of Parent Common Stock as reported on the
NYSE Composite Transaction Tape (as reported in The Wall Street Journal or,
if not reported thereby, any other authoritative source) on the last
trading day prior to the Closing Date.
(g) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the Exchange Fund
(including any shares of Parent Common Stock) which remains undistributed to the
holders of Company Common Stock for six months after the Effective Time shall be
delivered to Parent, upon demand, and any holders of Company Common Stock who
have not theretofore complied with this Article II shall thereafter look only to
Parent for, and Parent shall deliver, the applicable Merger Consideration, any
cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to which they are
entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(f) and any dividends or other distributions
with respect to the Parent Common Stock to which they are entitled pursuant to
Section 2.4(d). Any portion of the Exchange Fund remaining unclaimed by holders
of shares of Company Common Stock as of a date which is immediately prior to
such time as such amounts would otherwise escheat to or become property of any
government entity shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, become the
property of Parent free and clear of any claims or interest of any person
previously entitled thereto.
(h) No Liability. None of the Exchange Agent, Parent nor the Surviving
Corporation shall be liable to any holder of shares of Company Common Stock for
any such shares of Parent Common Stock (or dividends or distributions with
respect thereto) or cash delivered to a public official pursuant to any
abandoned property, escheat or similar law.
(i) Withholding Rights. Each of the Surviving Corporation and the Exchange
Agent shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise
payable pursuant to this Agreement to any holder of shares of Company Common
Stock such amounts as it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the
making of such payment under the Code, or any provision of state, local or
foreign tax law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld by the Surviving
Corporation or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be, such withheld amounts
shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the
holder of the shares of Company Common Stock in respect of which such deduction
and withholding was made by the Surviving Corporation or the Exchange Agent, as
the case may be.
(j) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or
destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming
such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by the
Surviving Corporation, the posting by such person of a bond, in such reasonable
amount as the Surviving Corporation may direct, as indemnity against any claim
that may be made against it with respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent
will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the
applicable Merger Consideration, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent
Common Stock to which the holders thereof are entitled pursuant to Section
2.4(f) and any dividends or other distributions to which the holders thereof are
entitled pursuant to this Agreement.
(k) Further Assurances. If, at any time after the Effective Time, the
Surviving Corporation shall consider or be advised that any deeds, bills of
sale, assignments, assurances or any other actions or things are necessary or
desirable to vest, perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in the Surviving
Corporation its right, title or interest in, to or under any of the rights,
properties or assets of either of the Merger Sub or the Company acquired or to
be acquired by the Surviving Corporation as a result of, or in connection with,
the Merger or otherwise to carry out this Agreement, the officers of the
Surviving Corporation shall be authorized to execute and deliver, in the name
and on behalf of each of the Merger Sub and the Company or otherwise, all such
deeds, bills of sale, assignments and assurances and to take and do, in such
names and on such behalves or otherwise, all such other actions and things as
may be necessary or desirable to vest, perfect or confirm any and all right,
title and interest in, to and under such rights, properties or assets in the
Surviving Corporation or otherwise to carry out the purposes of this Agreement.
SECTION 2.5. Stock Transfer Books. At the Effective Time, the stock
transfer books of the Company shall be closed and there shall be no further
registration of transfers of shares of Company Common Stock thereafter on the
records of the Company. From and after the Effective Time, the holders of
Certificates
A-5
<PAGE> 145
representing shares of Company Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall cease to have any rights with respect to such shares of
Company Common Stock, except as otherwise provided herein or by law. On or after
the Effective Time, any Certificates presented to the Exchange Agent (or Parent
for any reason) shall be converted into shares of Parent Common Stock, any cash
in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock to which the holders thereof
are entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(f) and any dividends or other distributions
to which the holders thereof are entitled pursuant to Section 2.4(d).
ARTICLE III.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTS OF THE COMPANY
The Company hereby represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Sub that,
except as set forth in the disclosure letter delivered by the Company to Parent
and Merger Sub on the date hereof (the "Company Disclosure Letter"):
SECTION 3.1. Organization, Qualification, Etc. The Company is a corporation
duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
State of Delaware and has the corporate power and authority to own its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted
and is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in each
jurisdiction in which the ownership of its properties or the conduct of its
business requires such qualification, except for jurisdictions in which such
failure to be so qualified or to be in good standing would not in the aggregate
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. The copies of the Company's
charter and by-laws which have been made available to Parent are complete and
correct and in full force and effect on the date hereof. Each of the Company's
Significant Subsidiaries (as defined in Regulation S-X promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act")) is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization, has the corporate power and
authority to own its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being
conducted, and is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in each
jurisdiction in which the ownership of its property or the conduct of its
business requires such qualification, except for jurisdictions in which such
failure to be so qualified or to be in good standing would not in the aggregate
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. All the outstanding shares of
capital stock of, or other ownership interests in, the Company's Subsidiaries
are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable and are owned by the Company,
directly or indirectly, free and clear of all liens, claims, charges or
encumbrances. There are no existing options, rights of first refusal, preemptive
rights, calls or commitments of any character relating to the issued or unissued
capital stock or other securities of, or other ownership interests in, any
Subsidiary of the Company.
SECTION 3.2. Capital Stock. The authorized capital stock of the Company consists
of 100,000,000 shares of the Company Common Stock, 2,000,000 shares of the
Company's Class A preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Company Class
A Preferred Stock"), and 2,000,000 shares of the Company's Class B preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Company Class B Preferred Stock," and,
together with the Class A Preferred Stock, the "Company Preferred Stock"). As of
October 5, 1998, 51,036,531 shares of the Company Common Stock and no shares of
the Company Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding. All the outstanding
shares of the Company Common Stock have been validly issued and are fully paid
and non-assessable. As of October 8, 1998, there were no outstanding
subscriptions, options, warrants, rights or other arrangements or commitments
obligating the Company to issue any shares of its stock other than options and
other rights to receive or acquire an aggregate of 15,220,972 shares of the
Company Common Stock pursuant to:
(a) the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan;
(b) the Company's Amended and Restated 1995 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the "Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan");
(c) the Company's 1997 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan;
(d) the Company's 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan;
A-6
<PAGE> 146
(e) the Company's 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Purchase Plan;
(f) the Company's 1996 Executive Stock Unit Plan;
(g) the Company's non-employee directors stock units;
(h) the Company's non-employee directors stock option agreements;
(i) the Company's obligations pursuant to the Company-CMM Limited
Partnership Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended.
(j) the Company Warrants expiring September 18, 2001;
(k) the Company Warrants expiring February 27, 2002;
(l) the Company's liquid yield option notes due 2011;
(m) the Company's liquid yield option notes due 2018 (the notes
referred to in (l) and (m) being collectively the "LYONs"); and
(n) a non-qualified stock option for 100,000 shares.
Except for the issuance of shares of the Company Common Stock pursuant to
the options and other rights referred to in Sections 3.2(a)-(n) above, since
February 3, 1998, no shares of the Company Common Stock have been issued.
SECTION 3.3. Corporate Authority Relative to this Agreement. No
Violation. The Company has the corporate power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and the Parent Stockholders Voting Agreement and to carry out its
obligations hereunder and thereunder. The execution and delivery of this
Agreement and the Parent Stockholders Voting Agreement and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been duly and validly
authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company and, except for the approval
and adoption of the agreement of merger (as such term is used in Section 251 of
the DGCL) contained in this Agreement and the approval of the Merger by the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock, no
other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are necessary to
authorize this Agreement, the Parent Stockholders Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby. The Board of Directors of the Company has
determined that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable
and in the best interest of its stockholders and to recommend to such
stockholders that they vote in favor thereof. This Agreement and the Parent
Stockholders Agreement have been duly and validly executed and delivered by the
Company and, assuming this Agreement and the Parent Stockholders Agreement have
been duly and validly executed and delivered by the other parties hereto and
thereto, and subject to the Company Stockholder Approval (as defined in Section
5.3 hereof) this Agreement and the Parent Stockholders Agreement constitute
valid and binding agreements of the Company, enforceable against the Company in
accordance with its terms (except insofar as enforceability may be limited by
applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws
affecting creditors' rights generally, or by principles governing the
availability of equitable remedies). Other than in connection with or in
compliance with the provisions of the DGCL, the Securities Act, the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"), applicable
approvals of the Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC") pursuant to the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and any regulations promulgated
thereunder (the "Communications Act"), any non-United States competition,
antitrust and investment laws and the securities or blue sky laws of the various
states, and, other than the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the
Delaware Secretary of State and any necessary state filings to maintain the good
standing or qualification of the Surviving Corporation (collectively, the
"Company Required Approvals"), no authorization, consent or approval of, or
filing with, any governmental body or authority is necessary for the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
or the Parent Stockholder Voting Agreement, except for such authorizations,
consents, approvals or filings, the failure to obtain or make which would not,
in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company; provided that
the Company makes no representation with respect to such of the foregoing as are
required by reason of the regulatory status of Parent
A-7
<PAGE> 147
or any of its Subsidiaries or facts specifically pertaining to any of them.
Except for the Company Required Approvals, the Company is not subject to or
obligated under any charter, bylaw or contract provision or any governmental
licenses, franchise or permit, or subject to any order or decree, which would be
breached or violated by its executing or, subject to the approval of its
stockholders, carrying out this Agreement or the Parent Stockholder Voting
Agreement, except for any breaches or violations which would not, in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
SECTION 3.4. Reports and Financial Statements. The Company has made
available to Parent true and complete copies of:
(a) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") for the years ended December 31, 1996
and 1997;
(b) the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC
for the quarters ended March 31, 1998 and June 30, 1998;
(c) each definitive proxy statement filed by the Company with the
since SEC since December 31, 1996;
(d) each final prospectus filed by the Company with the SEC since
December 31, 1996, except any final prospectus on Form S-8; and
(e) all Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC
since December 31, 1997.
As of their respective dates, such reports, proxy statements, and
prospectuses filed on or prior to the date hereof (collectively, the "Company
SEC Reports") (i) complied as to form in all material respects with the
applicable requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder and (ii) did not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided, that the
foregoing clause (ii) shall not apply to the financial statements included in
the Company SEC Reports (which are covered by the following sentence). The
audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements included in the Company SEC Reports (including any related
notes and schedules) fairly present in all material respects the financial
position of the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates
thereof and their results of operations and cash flows for the periods or as of
the dates then ended (subject, where appropriate, to normal year-end
adjustments), in each case in accordance with past practice and generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") consistently
applied during the periods involved (except as otherwise disclosed in the notes
thereto and except that the unaudited financial statements therein do not
contain all of the footnote disclosures required by GAAP). Since January 1,
1997, the Company has timely filed all material reports, registration statements
and other filings required to be filed by it with the SEC under the rules and
regulations of the SEC.
SECTION 3.5. No Undisclosed Liabilities. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations of any nature, whether or not
accrued, contingent or otherwise, of a type required by GAAP to be reflected on
a consolidated balance sheet except (a) liabilities or obligations reflected in
any of the Company SEC Reports and (b) liabilities or obligations which would
not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
SECTION 3.6. No Violation of Law. The businesses of the Company and its
Subsidiaries are not being conducted in violation of any law, ordinance or
regulation of any governmental body or authority (provided that no
representation or warranty is made in this Section 3.6 with respect to
Environmental Laws (as defined in Section 3.7 below) which are dealt with
exclusively in Section 3.7) except (a) as described in any of the Company SEC
Reports and (b) for violations or possible violations which would not in the
aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. The Company and its
Subsidiaries have all permits, licenses and governmental authorizations material
to ownership or occupancy of their respective properties and assets and the
carrying on of their respective businesses, except for such permits, licenses
and governmental authorizations the failure of which to have would not have in
the aggregate a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
A-8
<PAGE> 148
To the best Knowledge of the Company, the Company's Subsidiaries which are FCC
licensees are financially qualified, and are otherwise qualified to be FCC
licensees.
SECTION 3.7. Environmental Laws and Regulations. Except as described in any
of the Company SEC Reports, (a) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries is in
material compliance with all applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws
and regulations relating to pollution or protection of human health or the
environment (including, without limitation, ambient air, surface water, ground
water, land surface or subsurface strata) (collectively, "Environmental Laws"),
except for non-compliance which would not in the aggregate have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company, which compliance includes, but is not limited to,
the possession by the Company and its Subsidiaries of material permits and other
governmental authorizations required under applicable Environmental Laws, and
material compliance with the terms and conditions thereof, (b) neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice of, or, to the
Knowledge of the Company, is the subject of, any actions, causes of action,
claims, investigations, demands or notices by any Person alleging liability
under or non-compliance with any Environmental Law or that the Company or any
Subsidiary is a potentially responsible party at any Superfund site or state
equivalent site ("Environmental Claims") which would in the aggregate have a
Material Adverse Effect on the Company, (c) to the Knowledge of the Company,
there are no circumstances that are reasonably likely to prevent or interfere
with such material compliance in the future, (d) to the Knowledge of the
Company, the Company and its Subsidiaries have not disposed of or released
hazardous materials (at a concentration or level which requires remedial action
under any Environmental Law) at any real property currently owned or leased by
the Company or any Subsidiary or at any other real property, except for such
disposals or releases as would not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company, and (e) neither the Company nor its Subsidiaries have
agreed to indemnify any predecessor or other party with respect to any
environmental liability, other than customary indemnity provisions contained in
agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business which would not in
the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
SECTION 3.8. No Undisclosed Employee Benefit Plan Liabilities or Severance
Arrangements. Except as described in any of the Company SEC Reports, all
"employee benefit plans," as defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA") (including any multi-employer
plan as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA), maintained or contributed to by the
Company or its Subsidiaries are in compliance with all applicable provisions of
ERISA, the Code and any other applicable laws except for violations that would
not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. To the
Knowledge of the Company, none of the Company nor its Subsidiaries with respect
to such plans has engaged in a "prohibited transaction" within the meaning of
Section 4975 of the Code or Title I, Part 4 of ERISA except for transactions (i)
which are exempt under applicable law, regulations and administrative exemptions
or (ii) which in the aggregate would not have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company, and the Company and its Subsidiaries do not have any liabilities or
obligations with respect to any such employee benefit plans, whether or not
accrued, contingent (including any potential material withdrawal liability with
respect to any such multi-employer plans) or otherwise, except (a) as described
in any of the Company SEC Reports or previously disclosed in writing to Parent
and (b) for instances of non-compliance transactions or liabilities or
obligations that would not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company. To the Knowledge of the Company, no employee of the Company will be
entitled to any additional benefits or any acceleration of the time of payment
or vesting of any benefits under any employee incentive or benefit plan, program
or arrangement as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
The Company has previously made available to Parent a true and correct copy of
the Company's 401(k) plan and the Form 5500 and the audit report (which fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of such plan) related thereto. The Company and its Subsidiaries do
not maintain any employee benefit pension plan which is subject to Title IV of
ERISA. The Company's 401(k) Plan is exempt from federal income taxation under
Section 501 of the Code, and, to the Knowledge of the Company, nothing has
occurred with respect to the operation of such plan which could cause the loss
of such qualification or exemption or the imposition of any lien, penalty, or
tax under ERISA or the Code which would in the aggregate have a Material Adverse
Effect on the Company, and the Company and its Subsidiaries have not received
any material adverse notice concerning the 401(k) plan from the Internal Revenue
Service, the Department of Labor or the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
("PBGC") within the four years
A-9
<PAGE> 149
preceding the date of this Agreement. None of the Company nor any Subsidiary has
incurred any outstanding liability under Section 4062 of ERISA to the PBGC, to a
trust established under Section 4041 or 4042 of ERISA, or to a trustee appointed
under Section 4042 of ERISA, except for such liabilities as would not in the
aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. None of the Company's
employee benefit plans contain any provisions which would prohibit the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. As of the Closing Date, no payment
that is owed or may become due any director, officer, employee, or agent of the
Company or a Subsidiary will be non-deductible by the Company or any Subsidiary
by reason of Section 280G of the Code or under Section 4999 of the Code.
Section 3.9. Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Other than as disclosed
in the Company SEC Reports or previously disclosed in writing to Parent, since
June 30, 1998, the businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries have been
conducted in all material respects in the ordinary course and there has not been
any event, occurrence, development or state of circumstances or facts that has
had a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. Since June 30, 1998, no dividends
or distributions have been declared or paid on or made with respect to the
shares of capital stock or other equity interests of the Company or its
Subsidiaries nor have any such shares been repurchased or redeemed, other than
dividends or distributions paid to the Company or a Subsidiary.
SECTION 3.10. Investigations; Litigation. Except as described in any of the
Company SEC Reports or previously disclosed in writing to Parent:
(a) to the Knowledge of the Company, no investigation or review by any
governmental body or authority with respect to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries which would in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company is pending nor has any governmental body or authority notified
the Company of an intention to conduct the same; and
(b) there are no actions, suits or proceedings pending (or, to the
Company's Knowledge, threatened) against or affecting the Company or its
Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties or before any federal,
state, local or foreign governmental body or authority, which, in the
aggregate, are reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on the
Company.
To the Knowledge of the Company, the Company Disclosure Letter lists all of
the pending litigation of the Company.
SECTION 3.11. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement; Other
Information. None of the information with respect to the Company or its
Subsidiaries to be included in the Joint Proxy Statement (as defined in Section
5.2) or the Registration Statement (as defined in Section 5.2) will, in the case
of the Joint Proxy Statement or any amendments thereof or supplements thereto,
at the time of the mailing of the Joint Proxy Statement or any amendments or
supplements thereto, and at the time of the Company Special Meeting (as defined
in Section 5.3), or, in the case of the Registration Statement, at the time it
becomes effective or at the time of any post-effective amendment, contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, except
that no representation is made by the Company with respect to information
supplied in writing by Parent or any affiliate of Parent specifically for
inclusion in the Joint Proxy Statement. The Joint Proxy Statement (as it relates
to the Company) will comply as to form in all material respects with the
provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
SECTION 3.12. Lack of Ownership of Parent Common Stock. Neither the Company
nor any of its Subsidiaries owns any shares of Parent Common Stock or other
securities convertible into shares of Parent Common Stock (exclusive of any
shares owned by the Company's employee benefit plans).
SECTION 3.13. Tax Matters.
(a) All federal, state, local and foreign Tax Returns required to be filed
by or on behalf of the Company, each of its Subsidiaries, and each affiliated,
combined, consolidated or unitary group of which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a member (a "Company Group") have been timely filed or requests
for extensions to
A-10
<PAGE> 150
file such returns or reports have been timely filed and granted and have not
expired, and all returns filed are complete and accurate except to the extent
any failure to file or any inaccuracies in filed returns would not, individually
or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company. All Taxes
due and owing by the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or any Company Group
have been paid, or adequately reserved for, except to the extent any failure to
pay or reserve would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company. There is no audit examination, deficiency, refund
litigation, proposed adjustment or matter in controversy with respect to any
Taxes due and owing by the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or any Company
Group nor has the Company or any Subsidiary filed any waiver of the statute of
limitations applicable to the assessment or collection of any Tax, in each case,
which would, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on
the Company. All assessments for Taxes due and owing by the Company, any
Subsidiary of the Company or any Company Group with respect to completed and
settled examinations or concluded litigation have been paid. Neither the Company
nor any Subsidiary is a party to any tax indemnity agreement, tax sharing
agreement or other agreement under which the Company or any Subsidiary could
become liable to another person as a result of the imposition of a Tax upon any
person, or the assessment or collection of a Tax, except for such agreements as
would not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect. The Company has
provided Parent with written schedules of (i) the taxable years of the Company
for which the statutes of limitations with respect to federal income Taxes have
not expired, and (ii) with respect to federal income Taxes, those years for
which examinations have been completed, those years for which examinations are
presently being conducted, and those years for which examinations have not yet
been initiated. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries has complied in all
material respects with all rules and regulations relating to the withholding of
Taxes, except to the extent any such failure to comply would not, individually
or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
(b) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has Knowledge of any
fact or has taken any action that could reasonably be expected to prevent the
Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)
of the Code.
SECTION 3.14. Opinion of Financial Advisor. The Board of Directors of the
Company has received the opinion of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities
Corporation ("DLJ") dated the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as of
such date, the Exchange Ratio (as defined therein) is fair to the Company's
stockholders from a financial point of view. A copy of the written opinion of
DLJ will be delivered to Parent as soon as practicable after the date of this
Agreement.
SECTION 3.15. Required Vote of the Company Stockholders. The affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company
Common Stock is required to approve the Merger. No other vote of the
stockholders of the Company is required by law or the charter or By-Laws of the
Company in order for the Company to consummate the Merger and the transactions
contemplated hereby.
SECTION 3.16. Insurance. The Company and its Subsidiaries have insurance
policies, including without limitation policies of life, fire, health and other
casualty and liability insurance, that the Company believes is sufficient for
its business and operations.
SECTION 3.17. Real Property; Title. The Company's Subsidiaries have good
and marketable title to all real properties owned by them except where the
failure to have such title would not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse
Effect.
SECTION 3.18. Collective Bargaining Agreements and Labor. The Company has
previously made available to Parent all labor or collective bargaining
agreements in effect as of the date of this Agreement which pertain to a
material number of the employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries. There are
no pending complaints, charges or claims against the Company or its Subsidiaries
filed with any public or governmental authority, arbitrator or court based upon
the employment or termination by the Company of any individual, except for such
complaints, charges or claims which if adversely determined would not in the
aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
A-11
<PAGE> 151
SECTION 3.19. Material Contracts. Neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries Knows of, or has received notice of, any violation or default under
any "material contract" (as such term is defined in item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K of the SEC) to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party except for such violations or defaults as would not in the aggregate have
a Material Adverse Effect on the Company.
SECTION 3.20. Takeover Statute. The Board of Directors of the Company has
approved this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby and, assuming
the accuracy of Parent's representation and warranty contained in Section 4.12,
such approval constitutes approval of the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby by the Board of Directors of the Company under the
provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL such that Section 203 of the DGCL does not
apply to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby. To the
knowledge of the Company, no other state takeover statute is applicable to the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby.
ARTICLE IV.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Parent and Merger Sub hereby jointly and severally represent and warrant to
the Company that except as set forth in the Parent Disclosure Letter delivered
to the Company on the date hereof:
SECTION 4.1. Organization, Qualification, Etc. Each of Parent and Merger
Sub is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under
the laws of its jurisdiction of organization and has the corporate power and
authority to own its properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is
now being conducted and is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing
in each jurisdiction in which the ownership of its properties or the conduct of
its business requires such qualification, except for jurisdictions in which such
failure to be so qualified or to be in good standing would not in the aggregate
have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent or Merger Sub. The copies of Parent's
Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Amended and Restated By-laws and
Merger Sub's charter and by-laws which have been made available to the Company
are complete and correct and in full force and effect on the date hereof. Each
of Parent's Significant Subsidiaries is a corporation or partnership duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization, has the corporate power and
authority to own its properties and to carry on its business as it is now being
conducted, and is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in each
jurisdiction in which the ownership of its property or the conduct of its
business requires such qualification, except for jurisdictions in which such
failure to be so qualified or to be in good standing would not in the aggregate
have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent or Merger Sub. All the outstanding
shares of capital stock of, or other ownership interests in, Parent's
Subsidiaries and Merger Sub are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable
and are owned by Parent, directly or indirectly, free and clear of all liens,
claims, charges or encumbrances, except for restrictions contained in credit
agreements and similar instruments to which Parent is a party. Except as
disclosed in the Parent SEC Reports, there are no existing options (except for
those set forth in Section 4.2 below), rights of first refusal, preemptive
rights, calls or commitments of any character relating to the issued or unissued
capital stock or other securities of, or other ownership interests in, any
Subsidiary of Parent or Merger Sub.
SECTION 4.2. Capital Stock. The authorized capital stock of Parent consists
of 600,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock, and 2,000,000 shares of Class A
Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share and 8,000,000 shares of Class B
Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (collectively, the "Parent Preferred
Stock"). The shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the Merger or upon
the exercise of the Company stock options, warrants, conversion rights or other
rights or upon vesting or payment of other Company equity-based awards
thereafter will, when issued, be validly issued fully paid and non-assessable.
As of September 30, 1998, 248,454,892 shares of Parent Common Stock and no
shares of Parent Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding. All the
outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock have been validly issued and are fully
paid and non-assessable. As of September 30, 1998, there were no outstanding
subscriptions, options, warrants, rights or other arrangements or commitments
obligating Parent to issue any shares of its capital stock other
A-12
<PAGE> 152
than options and other rights to receive or acquire an aggregate of 17,562,510
shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to:
(a) the 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Parent;
(b) the 1994 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Parent;
(c) the 1994 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan;
(d) the Parent Director's non-Qualified Stock Option Plan;
(e) the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan;
(f) the Stockholders Agreement, dated April 9, 1997, by and among
Parent, Eller Media Corporation, and EM Holdings, L.L.C.;
(g) various other option agreements with officers or employees of the
Parent or the Parent's Subsidiaries, option assumption agreements, and
incentive compensation grants; and
(h) Parent's 2 5/8% Senior Convertible Notes due 2003, convertible
into Parent Common Stock.
SECTION 4.3. Corporate Authority Relative to this Agreement. No
Violation. Each of Parent and Merger Sub has the corporate power and authority
to enter into this Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement dated the date
hereof between Parent and the Voting Stockholders (the "Registration Rights
Agreement" and, together with the Fund Voting Agreement, the "Ancillary
Agreements") and the Fund Voting Agreement and to carry out its obligations
hereunder and thereunder. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the
Ancillary Agreements and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby have been duly and validly authorized by the Boards of
Directors of Parent and Merger Sub and except for the approval of the issuance
of shares of Parent Common Stock in the Merger by the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock actually present and voting at the
Parent Special Meeting, no other corporate or stockholder proceedings on the
part of Parent or Merger Sub are necessary to authorize this Agreement, the
Ancillary Agreements, the issuance of the Parent Common Stock and the other
transactions contemplated hereby. The Board of Directors of each of Parent and
Merger Sub has determined that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
are advisable and in the best interest of its stockholders and to recommend to
such stockholders that they vote in favor thereof. This Agreement and the
Ancillary Agreements have been duly and validly executed and delivered by Parent
and Merger Sub and, assuming this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements have
been duly and validly executed and delivered by the other parties hereto, and
subject to the Parent Stockholder Approval (as defined in Section 5.3 hereof),
this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements constitute valid and binding
agreements of Parent and Merger Sub, enforceable against each of them in
accordance with its terms (except insofar as enforceability may be limited by
applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws
affecting creditors' rights generally, or by principles governing the
availability of equitable remedies). Other than in connection with or in
compliance with the provisions of the DGCL, the Securities Act, the Exchange
Act, the HSR Act, the Communications Act, any non-United States competition,
antitrust and investments laws and the securities or blue sky laws of the
various states, and, other than the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the
Delaware Secretary of State and any necessary state filings to maintain the good
standing or qualification of the Surviving Corporation (collectively, the
"Parent Required Approvals"), no authorization, consent or approval of, or
filing with, any governmental body or authority is necessary for the
consummation by Parent of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the
Ancillary Agreements, except for such authorizations, consents, approvals or
filings, the failure to obtain or make which would not, in the aggregate, have a
Material Adverse Effect on Parent; provided that Parent makes no representation
with respect to such of the foregoing as are required by reason of the
regulatory status of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or facts
specifically pertaining to any of them. Except for the Parent Required
Approvals, neither Parent nor Merger Sub is subject to or obligated under any
charter, by-law or contract provision or any governmental license, franchise or
permit, or subject to any order or decree, which would be breached or violated
by its executing or carrying out this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements,
except for any breaches or violations which would not, in the aggregate, have a
Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
A-13
<PAGE> 153
SECTION 4.4. Reports and Financial Statements. Parent has previously made
available to the Company true and complete copies of:
(a) Parent's Annual Reports on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for each
of the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997;
(b) Parent's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC for the
quarters ended March 31, 1998 and June 30, 1998;
(c) each definitive proxy statement filed by Parent with the SEC since
December 31, 1996;
(d) each final prospectus filed by Parent with the SEC since December
31, 1996, except any final prospectus on Form S-8; and
(e) all Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by Parent with the SEC since
December 31, 1997.
As of their respective dates, such reports, proxy statements and
prospectuses filed on or prior to the date hereof (collectively, "Parent SEC
Reports") (i) complied as to form in all material respect with the applicable
requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder and (ii) did not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; provided, that the
foregoing clause (ii) shall not apply to the financial statements included in
the Parent SEC Reports (which are covered by the following sentence). The
audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements included in the Parent SEC Reports (including any related
notes and schedules) fairly present in all material respects the financial
position of Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for the periods or as of
the dates then ended (subject, where appropriate, to normal year-end
adjustments), in each case in accordance with GAAP consistently applied during
the periods involved (except as otherwise disclosed in the notes thereto and
except that the unaudited financial statements therein do not contain all of the
footnote disclosures required by GAAP). Since January 1, 1997, Parent has timely
filed all material reports, registration statements and other filings required
to be filed by it with the SEC under the rules and regulations of the SEC.
SECTION 4.5. No Undisclosed Liabilities. Neither Parent nor any of its
Subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations of any nature, whether or not
accrued, contingent or otherwise, of a type required by GAAP to be reflected on
a consolidated balance sheet except (a) liabilities or obligations reflected in
any of the Parent SEC Reports and (b) liabilities or obligations which would not
in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
SECTION 4.6. No Violation of Law. The businesses of Parent and its
Subsidiaries are not being conducted in violation of any law, ordinance or
regulation of any governmental body or authority (provided that no
representation or warranty is made in this Section 4.6 with respect to
Environmental Laws) except (a) as described in any of the Parent SEC Reports and
(b) for violations or possible violations which would not in the aggregate have
a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
SECTION 4.7. Environmental Laws and Regulations. Except as described in any
of the Parent SEC Reports, (a) Parent and each of its Subsidiaries is in
material compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws, except for
non-compliance which would not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect
on Parent, which compliance includes, but is not limited to, the possession by
Parent and its Subsidiaries of material permits and other governmental
authorizations required under applicable Environmental Laws, and compliance with
the terms and conditions thereof; (b) neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries
has received written notice of, or, to the Knowledge of Parent, is the subject
of, any Environmental Claims which would in the aggregate have a Material
Adverse Effect on Parent; and (c) to the knowledge of Parent, there are no
circumstances that are reasonably likely to prevent or interfere with such
material compliance in the future.
SECTION 4.8. No Undisclosed Employee Benefit Plan Liabilities or Severance
Arrangements. Except as described in any of the Parent SEC Reports, all
"employee benefit plans" as defined in Section 3(3) of
A-14
<PAGE> 154
ERISA, maintained or contributed to by Parent or its Subsidiaries are in
material compliance with all applicable provisions of ERISA and the Code, and
Parent and its Subsidiaries do not have any liabilities or obligations with
respect to any such employee benefit plans, whether or not accrued, contingent
or otherwise, except (a) as described in any of the Parent SEC Reports and (b)
for instances of noncompliance or liabilities or obligations that would not in
the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. No employee of Parent
will be entitled to any additional benefits or any acceleration of the time of
payment or vesting of any benefits under any employee incentive or benefit plan,
program or arrangement as a result of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
SECTION 4.9. Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Other than as disclosed
in the Parent SEC Reports, since June 30, 1998, the businesses of Parent and its
Subsidiaries have been conducted in all material respects in the ordinary course
and there has not been any event, occurrence, development or state of
circumstances or facts that has had a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
SECTION 4.10. Investigations; Litigation. Except as described in any of the
Parent SEC Reports or previously disclosed in writing to the Company:
(a) to the Knowledge of Parent, no investigation or review by any
governmental body or authority with respect to Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries which would in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on
Parent is pending nor has any governmental body or authority notified
Parent of an intention to conduct the same; and
(b) there are no actions, suits or proceedings pending (or, to
Parent's Knowledge, threatened) against or affecting Parent or its
Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties, or before any federal,
state, local or foreign governmental body or authority which in the
aggregate is reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
SECTION 4.11. Joint Proxy Statement; Registration Statement; Other
Information. None of the information with respect to Parent or its Subsidiaries
to be included in the Joint Proxy Statement (as defined in Section 5.2) or the
Registration Statement (as defined in Section 5.2) will, in the case of the
Joint Proxy Statement or any amendments thereof or supplements thereto, at the
time of the mailing of the Proxy Statement or any amendments or supplements
thereto, and at the time of the Company Special Meeting, or, in the case of the
Registration Statement, at the time it becomes effective or at the time of any
post-effective amendment, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading, except that no representation is made by Parent
with respect to information supplied in writing by the Company or any affiliate
of the Company specifically for inclusion in the Joint Proxy Statement or the
Registration Statement. Each of the Joint Proxy Statement (as it relates to
Parent) and Registration Statement will comply as to form in all material
respects with the provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
SECTION 4.12. Lack of Ownership of Company Common Stock. Neither Parent nor
any of its Subsidiaries owns any shares of Company Common Stock or other
securities convertible into shares of Company Common Stock (exclusive of any
shares owned by Parent's employee benefit plans).
SECTION 4.13. Tax Matters.
(a) All federal, state, local and foreign Tax Returns required to be filed
by or on behalf of Parent, each of its Subsidiaries, and each affiliated,
combined, consolidated or unitary group of which Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries is a member (a "Parent Group") have been timely filed or requests
for extensions to file such returns or reports have been timely filed and
granted and have not expired, and all returns filed are complete and accurate
except to the extent any failure to file or any inaccuracies in filed returns
would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on
Parent. All Taxes due and owing by Parent, any Subsidiary of Parent or any
Parent Group have been paid, or adequately reserved for, except to the extent
any failure to pay or reserve would not, individually or in the aggregate, have
a Material Adverse Effect on Parent. There is no audit examination, deficiency,
refund litigation, proposed adjustment or matter in controversy with
A-15
<PAGE> 155
respect to any Taxes due and owing by Parent, any Subsidiary of Parent or any
Parent Group which would, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material
Adverse Effect on Parent. All assessments for Taxes due and owing by Parent, any
Subsidiary of Parent or any Parent Group with respect to completed and settled
examinations or concluded litigation have been paid. As soon as practicable
after the public announcement of the Merger Agreement, Parent will provide the
Company with written schedules of (i) the taxable years of Parent for which the
statutes of limitations with respect to federal income Taxes have not expired,
and (ii) with respect to federal income Taxes, those years for which
examinations have been completed, those years for which examinations are
presently being conducted, and those years for which examinations have not yet
been initiated. Parent and each of its Subsidiaries has complied in all material
respects with all rules and regulations relating to the withholding of Taxes,
except to the extent any such failure to comply would not, individually or in
the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
(b) Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries knows of any fact or has
taken any action that could reasonably be expected to prevent the Merger from
qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
SECTION 4.14. Required Vote of Parent Stockholders. The affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock
actually present and voting at the Parent Special Meeting (provided that at
least 50% of the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock are actually voted)
is required to approve the issuance of Parent Common Stock in the Merger. No
other vote of the stockholders of Parent or Merger Sub is required by law, the
charter or By-Laws of Parent or Merger Sub in order for Parent and Merger Sub to
consummate the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby.
SECTION 4.15. Opinion of Financial Advisor. The Board of Directors of
Parent has received the opinion of Salomon Smith Barney Inc. ("SSB") dated the
date of this Agreement to the effect that, as of such date, the Exchange Ratio
(as defined therein) is fair from a financial point of view to Parent. A copy of
the written opinion of SSB will be delivered to the Company as soon as
practicable after the date of this Agreement.
SECTION 4.16. Insurance. Parent and its Subsidiaries have insurance
policies, including without limitation policies of life, fire, health and other
casualty and liability insurance, that Parent believes is sufficient for its
business and operations.
SECTION 4.17. Real Property; Title. Parent has good and marketable title to
all real properties owned by it except where the failure to have such title
would not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect.
SECTION 4.18. Collective Bargaining Agreements and Labor. There are no
pending complaints, charges or claims against Parent or its Subsidiaries filed
with any public or governmental authority, arbitrator or court based upon the
employment or termination by Parent of any individual, except for such
complaints, charges or claims which if adversely determined would not in the
aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent.
SECTION 4.19. Material Contracts. Neither Parent nor any of its
Subsidiaries knows of, or has received notice of, any violation or default under
any material contract (as such term is defined in item 601(b)(10) of Regulation
S-K of the SEC) to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is a party except for
such violations or defaults as would not in the aggregate have a Material
Adverse Effect on Parent.
A-16
<PAGE> 156
ARTICLE V.
COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
SECTION 5.1. Conduct of Business by the Company or Parent. Except as
contemplated by this Agreement and in the Company Disclosure Letter or the
Parent Disclosure Letter, or as necessary or appropriate to satisfy the
obligations hereunder, prior to the Effective Time or the date, if any, on which
this Agreement is earlier terminated pursuant to Section 7.1, and except as may
be agreed to by the other parties hereto or as may be permitted pursuant to this
Agreement:
(a) The Company:
(i) shall, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, conduct its
operations according to their ordinary and usual course of business;
(ii) shall use its reasonable efforts, and cause each of its
Subsidiaries to use its reasonable efforts, consistent with prudent
business practice to (A) preserve intact its business organizations and
goodwill in all material respects, (B) keep available the services of
its officers and employees as a group, subject to changes in the
ordinary course, and (C) maintain satisfactory relationships with
suppliers, distributors, customers and others having business
relationships with them, in each case as a group;
(iii) shall notify Parent of any emergency or other change in the
normal course of its or its Subsidiaries' respective businesses or in
the operation of its or its Subsidiaries' respective properties and of
any complaints, investigations or hearings (or communications indicating
that the same may be contemplated) of any governmental body or authority
if such emergency, change, complaint, investigation or hearing could
have a Material Adverse Effect on the Company;
(iv) shall not authorize or pay any dividends on or make any
distribution with respect to its outstanding shares of stock;
(v) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
enter into or amend any severance or similar agreements or arrangements
which would be triggered by the transactions contemplated hereby, except
for the payment of stay bonuses as provided in Section 5.1(a)(vi)
hereof, with any of their respective directors or executive officers;
(vi) shall not, other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent in all material respects with past practice and other than
agreements with respect to the payment of reasonable stay bonuses, enter
into any new written material employment, consulting or salary
continuation agreements with any officers or directors or any employees
whose employment agreements provide for an annual base salary in excess
of $150,000 and have a term in excess of one year ("Key Employees"), or,
other than increases in the ordinary course of business, grant any
material increases in the compensation or benefits to officers,
directors, and Key Employees;
(vii) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
authorize, propose or announce an intention to authorize or propose, or
enter into an agreement with respect to, any merger, consolidation or
business combination, any acquisition of a material amount of assets or
securities, any disposition of assets or securities or any release or
relinquishment of any material contract rights not in the ordinary
course of business, except for (A) acquisitions previously disclosed in
the Company Disclosure Letter and (B) acquisitions for cash within the
scope of or related to the Company's existing business in which the
aggregate consideration is less than the sum of (x) fifty million
dollars ($50,000,000), (y) the monthly increase in the Company's
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
("EBITDA") multiplied by 2.5, provided, that pro forma EBITDA is in
excess of two hundred and seventy one million dollars ($271,000,000) for
the trailing twelve (12) month period and (z) ten percent (10%) of the
total proceeds of any equity share capital issued by Parent, in each
case which would not materially delay or impair the ability of the
Company to perform its obligations under this Agreement;
A-17
<PAGE> 157
(viii) shall not propose or adopt any amendments to its corporate
charter or by-laws;
(ix) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
(A) issue any shares of their capital stock, except upon exercise of
rights under the Company Stock Plans (as defined in Section 5.7), the
Company Warrants, the LYONs, any other agreement or arrangement referred
to in Section 3.2 or the Company Disclosure Letter, options issued
pursuant to existing employee incentive or benefit plans, programs or
arrangements and non-employee director plans (including, without
limitation, shares issued in connection with stock grants or awards or
the exercise of rights or options granted in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice pursuant to such plans, programs
or arrangements) or (B) effect any stock split not previously announced
or (C) otherwise change the capitalization of the Company as it existed
on June 30, 1998, except as contemplated herein;
(x) except as consistent with past practice but, in any event, not
in an amount in excess of 316,667 shares of Company Common Stock in the
aggregate, and except for rights to participate in the Company Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, shall not, and shall not permit any of its
Subsidiaries to, grant, confer or award any options, warrants,
conversion rights or other rights, to acquire any shares of its capital
stock, provided, that, the Company shall not acquire shares of Company
Common Stock except for such purchases by the Company made in connection
with the Company's 401(k) plan;
(xi) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
except in the ordinary course of business in connection with employee
incentive and benefit plans, programs or arrangements in existence on
the date hereof, purchase or redeem any shares of its stock;
(xii) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to
amend in any significant respect the terms of their respective employee
benefit plans, programs or arrangements in existence on the date hereof,
or adopt any new employee benefit plans, programs or arrangements except
(A) that the Company may amend any annual incentive plan existing on the
date hereof to provide for prorated incentive bonus awards related to
performance for the period ending on the Closing Date consistent with
the target for any such annual incentive plan for 1998, and (B) in the
ordinary course of business, as required by law or to maintain tax
qualified status or as requested by the Internal Revenue Service in
order to receive a determination letter for such employee benefit plan;
(xiii) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
amend in any material respect its Revolving Credit Agreement or enter
into any loan agreement as borrower, or, except as consistent with past
practice, as lender;
(xiv) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
except with respect to agreements contemplated by or permitted pursuant
to this Agreement, enter into any material agreement with aggregate
consideration of $2.0 million per year, except for any contract
involving sports broadcast rights;
(xv) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries, to
enter into an agreement with any Affiliate of the Company, any family
member of any Affiliate of the Company or any stockholder who owns more
than 10% of the outstanding capital stock of the Company;
(xvi) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to
make any material Tax election or settle or compromise any material Tax
liability, other than in connection with currently pending proceedings
or other than in the ordinary course of business;
(xvii) shall not enter into, amend, or extend any material
collective bargaining or other labor agreement, except as required by
law and except in the ordinary course of business consistent in all
material respects with past practices;
(xviii) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
buy, sell or trade any equity security of Parent including, without
limitation, entering into any put, call, option, swap, collar or any
other derivative transaction which has a similar economic effect; and
A-18
<PAGE> 158
(xix) shall not agree, or permit any of its Subsidiaries to agree,
in writing or otherwise, to take any of the foregoing actions described
in clauses (iv) through (xviii) or take any action which would make any
representation or warranty in Article III hereof untrue or incorrect.
(b) The Parent:
(i) shall, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, conduct its
operations according to their ordinary and usual course of business;
provided, however, that nothing contained in this proviso shall limit
Parent's ability to authorize or propose, or enter into, an agreement
with respect to any acquisitions or to issue any debt or equity
securities;
(ii) shall take all action necessary to cause Merger Sub to perform
its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the Merger on the
terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement;
(iii) shall and shall cause Merger Sub to vote all shares of
Company Common Stock, if any, beneficially owned by Merger Sub or its
affiliates in favor of adoption and approval of the Merger and this
Agreement at the Company Special Meeting (as defined in Section 5.3);
(iv) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
make any acquisition, by means of a merger or otherwise, of assets or
securities, or any sale, lease, encumbrance or other disposition of
assets or securities, or enter into any similar transaction, or enter
into an agreement to effect any of the foregoing, in each case which
would reasonably be expected to adversely affect the ability of Parent
to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or
materially delay obtaining any consents or approvals of any Governmental
Entity required under this Agreement or otherwise delay the Closing;
(v) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
change any of the accounting principles or practices used by it or any
of its Subsidiaries, except as required by the SEC or required by GAAP;
(vi) shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
buy, sell or trade any equity security of Parent including, without
limitation, entering into any put, call, option, swap, collar or any
other derivative transaction which has a similar economic effect; and
(vii) shall not agree, or permit any of its Subsidiaries to agree,
in writing or otherwise, to take any of the foregoing actions described
in clauses (iv) through (vi) or take any action which would make any
representation or warranty in Article IV hereof untrue or incorrect.
SECTION 5.2. Proxy Material; Registration Statement.
(a) The Company and the Parent will as promptly as practicable following
the date of this Agreement, prepare and file with the SEC, will use its
reasonable efforts to have cleared by the SEC and thereafter mail to its
stockholders as promptly as practicable, a joint proxy statement that will be
the same proxy statement/ prospectus contained in the Registration Statement (as
hereinafter defined) and a form of proxy, in connection with the vote of each of
the Company's and the Parent's stockholders with respect to the matters
contemplated hereby (such proxy statement/prospectus, together with any
amendments thereof or supplements thereto, in each case in the form or forms
mailed to the Company's and the Parent's stockholders, is herein called the
"Joint Proxy Statement").
(b) Parent will as promptly as practicable following the date of this
Agreement, prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement of the Parent
on Form S-4 (such registration statement together with all and any amendments
and supplements thereto, being herein referred to as the "Registration
Statement"), which shall include the Joint Proxy Statement. Such Registration
Statement shall be used for the purposes of registering with the SEC and with
applicable state securities authorities the issuance of Parent Common Stock to
holders of Company Common Stock in connection with the Merger. In addition, each
of Parent and the Company will upon reasonable advance notice provide the other
with all information and other data as may be reasonably
A-19
<PAGE> 159
requested by Parent or the Company, as the case may be, in connection with the
preparation and filing of the Registration Statement and the Joint Proxy
Statement.
(c) The Parent shall use its best efforts to cause the Registration
Statement to become effective under the Securities Act and applicable state
securities laws at the earliest practicable date and to remain effective until
the Effective Time.
SECTION 5.3. Stockholders' Meeting. Each of the Company and Parent shall,
in accordance with applicable law and their respective Certificate or Articles
of Incorporation and the By-Laws duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a
special meeting (which, as may be duly adjourned, shall be referred to as the
"Parent Special Meeting" or the "Company Special Meeting," as the case may be,
and, together as the "Special Meetings") of its respective stockholders as soon
as practicable for the purpose of, in the case of the Company, approving and
adopting the agreement of merger (as such term is used in Section 251 of the
DGCL) set forth in this Agreement and approving the Merger, and in the case of
Parent, approving the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock to the
stockholders of the Company in the Merger, by the holders of, in the case of the
Company, a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock and, in
the case of Parent, a majority of the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock
actually present and voting (the "Company Stockholder Approval" and the "Parent
Stockholder Approval," as the case may be). Parent and the Company agree to use
their reasonable efforts to cause the Special Meetings to occur within
forty-five (45) days after the date on which the Registration Statement becomes
effective. Each of Parent and the Company shall include in the Joint Proxy
Statement the recommendation of their Boards of Directors that stockholders vote
in favor of the Company Stockholder Approval or the Parent Stockholder Approval,
as the case may be; in each case subject to the duties of the respective Boards
of Directors to make any further disclosure to the stockholders (which shall
not, unless expressly stated, constitute a withdrawal or adverse modification of
such recommendation) and, in the case of the Company, subject to the right to
change such recommendation or terminate this Agreement following receipt of a
Superior Proposal as defined in Section 5.10.
SECTION 5.4. Approvals and Consents; Cooperation.
(a) The Company and Parent shall together, or pursuant to an allocation of
responsibility to be agreed upon between them:
(i) as soon as is reasonably practicable take all such action as may
be required under state blue sky or securities laws in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
(ii) promptly prepare and file with the NYSE and such other stock
exchanges as shall be agreed upon listing applications covering the shares
of Parent Common Stock issuable in the Merger or upon exercise of the
Company stock options, warrants, conversion rights or other rights or
vesting or payment of other Company equity-based awards and use its
reasonable best efforts to obtain, prior to the Effective Time, approval
for the listing of such Parent Common Stock, subject only to official
notice of issuance;
(iii) cooperate with one another in order to lift any injunctions or
remove any other impediment to the consummation of the transactions
contemplated herein; and
(iv) cooperate with one another in obtaining the opinions described in
Section 6.1(h) of this Agreement.
(b) Subject to the limitations contained in Section 5.2, the Company and
Parent shall each furnish to one another and to one another's counsel all such
information as may be required in order to effect the foregoing actions.
SECTION 5.5. Access to Information; Confidentiality. As permitted by law,
each of the Company and Parent shall, upon reasonable notice to an Executive
Officer (as defined in Section 8.3 hereof) of the Company or Parent, as the case
may be, afford to the other party, and to such party's authorized officers,
employees, accountants, counsel, financial advisors and other representatives,
reasonable access during normal business hours, in a manner so as not to
interfere with the normal operations of the Company or Parent and
A-20
<PAGE> 160
their Subsidiaries of either and subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by
an Executive Officer of the Company or Parent, as the case may be, during the
period prior to the Effective Time to all the properties, books, contracts,
commitments and records of the Company or Parent and its Subsidiaries, and
during such period, the Company or Parent shall furnish promptly to the other
party (a) a copy of each report, schedule, registration statement and other
document filed by it or its subsidiaries during such period pursuant to the
requirements of applicable federal or state securities laws and (b) all other
information concerning its business, properties and personnel as the other party
may reasonably request. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, neither party nor any or its Subsidiaries shall be required to
disclose any information to the other party or its authorized representatives if
doing so would (i) violate any federal, state, local or foreign law, rule or
regulation to which such party or any of its Subsidiaries is subject; or (ii)
directly or indirectly affect either party's competitive position in any of the
markets in which either party operates or in respect of the activities in which
either party is engaged. No investigation or information furnished pursuant to
this Section 5.5 shall affect any representations or warranties made by the
parties herein or the conditions to the obligations of the parties to consummate
the Merger. Each party will keep such information provided to it by the other
party confidential in accordance with the terms of the Confidentiality
Agreement, dated August 24, 1998, between the Parent and the Company or the
Confidentiality Agreement dated October 7, 1998 between the Company and Parent,
as the case may be (the "Confidentiality Agreements") the terms of which are
incorporated herein by reference, as if such information were Evaluation
Material (as such term is defined in the Confidentiality Agreements).
SECTION 5.6. Affiliates. The Company shall, prior to the Effective Time,
deliver to Parent a list (reasonably satisfactory to counsel for Parent),
setting forth the names and addresses of all persons who are, at the time of the
Company Meeting, in the Company's reasonable judgment, "affiliates" of the
Company for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act. The Company shall
furnish such information and documents as Parent may reasonably request for the
purpose of reviewing such list.
SECTION 5.7. Rights Under Stock Plans.
(a) Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Each outstanding option to
purchase shares of Company Common Stock ("Option") and each outstanding stock
appreciation right relating to appreciation in the value of a share of Company
Common Stock ("SAR") granted under the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan, the
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreements, the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
or the 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (the "Company Stock Plans"), which
is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, whether or not then
exercisable, shall, if necessary, accelerate and become exercisable one (1) day
prior to the Effective Time. The Option or SAR, as the case may be, shall be
assumed by Parent and deemed to constitute (A) with respect to each Option, an
option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions, mutatis mutandis
(including, without limitation adjustments for any stock dividend, subdivision,
reclassification, recapitalization, split, combination, exchange of shares or
similar transaction), as were applicable under such Option prior to the
Effective Time, the number of shares of Parent Common Stock as the holder of
such Option would have been entitled to receive pursuant to the Merger had such
holder exercised such Option in full immediately prior to the Effective Time
(not taking into account whether or not such Option was in fact exercisable) at
a price per share equal to (x) the aggregate exercise price for Company Common
Stock purchasable pursuant to such Option divided by (y) the number of shares of
Parent Common Stock deemed purchasable pursuant to such assumed Option and (B)
with respect to each SAR, a stock appreciation right, having the same terms and
conditions, mutatis mutandis (including, without limitation adjustments for any
stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification, recapitalization, split,
combination, exchange of shares or similar transaction), as were applicable to
such SAR immediately prior to the Effective Time, with respect to the number of
shares of Parent Common Stock that a holder of a number of shares of Company
Common Stock equal to the number of such shares subject to such SAR immediately
prior to the Effective Time would have been entitled to receive pursuant to the
Merger, at an exercise price per share equal to (x) the aggregate exercise price
for Company Common Stock subject to such SAR divided by (y) the number of shares
of Parent Common Stock to which such assumed SAR relates; provided, that each
such assumed Option and SAR shall, immediately following the Effective Time,
become and be immediately exercisable in full and shall remain exercisable until
the expiration of its term; and provided, further, that the
A-21
<PAGE> 161
number of shares of Parent Common Stock that may be purchased upon exercise of
any such assumed Option or that shall be subject to any such assumed SAR shall
not include any fractional share and, upon exercise of such assumed Option or
SAR, a cash payment shall be made for any fractional share based upon the last
sale price per share of Parent Common Stock on the trading day immediately
preceding the date of exercise. From and after the Effective Time, Parent and
the Surviving Corporation shall comply with the terms of the Company Stock
Plans. The adjustments provided herein with respect to any Options that are
"incentive stock options" (as defined in Section 422 of the Code) shall be
effected in a manner consistent with Section 424(a) of the Code.
(b) Stock Units. Prior to or at the Effective Time, the Company shall
transfer to each participant in the Company's Executive Stock Unit Plan (the
"SUP") and to each holder of a Stock Unit under a Non-Employee Director Stock
Unit Agreement (a "Stock Unit Agreement") a number of shares of Company Common
Stock equal to the number of Stock Units (within the meaning of the SUP or Stock
Unit Agreement, respectively) then credited to a Stock Unit Account (within the
meaning of the SUP or Stock Unit Agreement, respectively) maintained for the
benefit of such participant or holder of such Stock Unit, less any shares
withheld by the Company to satisfy federal, state and local tax obligations
required by law to be withheld with respect to any grant, exercise or payment
made (excluding any Stock Unit that has prior to such time been converted to
cash or paid out in shares of Common Stock). Each share so transferred shall be
converted into the Merger Consideration in accordance with Section 2.3 hereof.
(c) Reservation and Registration of Shares. Parent shall cause to be taken
all corporate action necessary to reserve for issuance a sufficient number of
shares of Parent Common Stock for delivery upon exercise of Options in
accordance with this Section 5.7. Within three Business Days after the Effective
Time, Parent shall use its best efforts to cause the Parent Common Stock subject
to assumed Options to be registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a
registration statement on Form S-8 (or any successor or other appropriate forms)
and shall use its best efforts to cause the effectiveness of such registration
statement (and current status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained
therein) to be maintained for so long as such Options remain outstanding.
(d) Stock Purchase Plan. The Company shall take such action as is necessary
to cause the ending date of the then current offering period under the Company's
Employee Stock Purchase Plan to be immediately following the last anticipated
payroll date occurring prior to the Effective Time (the "Final Purchase Date").
On the Final Purchase Date, the Company shall apply the funds credited as of
such date under such plan within each participant's payroll withholding account
to the purchase of whole shares of Company Common Stock in accordance with the
terms of such Company employee stock purchase plan. Any cash balance remaining
in a participant's account which is insufficient to purchase an additional whole
share of Company Common Stock shall be refunded to such participant as soon as
practicable following the Final Purchase Date. Each share of Company Common
Stock so purchased shall be converted into the Merger Consideration in
accordance with Section 2.3 hereof.
SECTION 5.8. Filings; Other Action.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, the Company and
Parent shall (i) promptly make their respective filings and thereafter make any
other required submissions under the HSR Act and the Communications Act, (ii)
use reasonable efforts to cooperate with one another in (A) determining whether
any filings are required to be made with, or consents, permits, authorizations
or approvals are required to be obtained from, any third party, the United
States government or any agencies, departments or instrumentalities thereof or
other governmental or regulatory bodies or authorities of federal, state, local
and foreign jurisdictions in connection with the execution and delivery of this
Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and
thereby and (B) timely making all such filings and timely seeking all such
consents, permits, authorizations or approvals, and (iii) take, or cause to be
taken, all other actions and do, or cause to be done, all other things
necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective the transactions
contemplated hereby, including, without limitation, taking or undertaking all
such further action as may be necessary to resolve such objections, if any, as
the FCC, the Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division of the Department
of Justice, state antitrust enforcement authorities or competition
A-22
<PAGE> 162
authorities of any other nation or other jurisdiction or any other person may
assert under relevant antitrust, competition or communications laws with respect
to the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) Without limiting the generality of the undertakings pursuant to Section
5.8(a): (i) each of Parent and the Company shall provide promptly to the FCC or
to Governmental Entities with regulatory jurisdiction over enforcement of any
applicable antitrust laws ("Government Antitrust Entity") information and
documents requested by the FCC or such Government Antitrust Entity or necessary,
proper or advisable to permit consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement; (ii) without in any way limiting the provisions of Section
5.8(a)(i) above, each of Parent and the Company shall file any Notification and
Report Form and related material required under the HSR Act as soon as
practicable after the date hereof, and thereafter use its best efforts to
certify as soon as practicable its substantial compliance with any requests for
additional information or documentary material that may be made under the HSR
Act; (iii) Parent shall proffer its willingness to (A) sell or otherwise dispose
of, or hold separate and agree to sell or otherwise dispose of, such assets,
categories of assets or businesses of the Company or Parent or either's
respective Subsidiaries, (B) terminate such existing relationships and
contractual rights and obligations and (C) amend or terminate such existing
licenses or other intellectual property agreements and to enter into such new
licenses or other intellectual property agreements (and, in each case, to enter
into agreements or stipulate to the entry of an order or decree or file
appropriate applications with the FCC or the relevant Government Antitrust
Entity giving effect thereto) in each case with respect to the foregoing clauses
(A), (B) or (C), if such action is likely to be necessary for the purpose of
avoiding or preventing any action by the FCC or any Government Antitrust Entity
which would restrain, enjoin or otherwise prevent or materially delay
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement prior to the
deadline specified in Section 7.1(b) hereof; (iv) Parent shall take promptly, in
the event that any permanent or preliminary injunction or other order is entered
or becomes reasonably foreseeable to be entered in any proceeding that would
make consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement unlawful or that would prevent or delay consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby, any and all steps (including the appeal
thereof, the posting of a bond or the taking of the steps contemplated by clause
(iii) of this subsection (b)) necessary to vacate, modify or suspend such
injunction or order so as to permit such consummation prior to the deadline
specified in Section 7.1 (b); (v) each of the Company and Parent will keep the
other informed of any material communication, and provide to the other copies of
all correspondence, between it (or its advisors) and the FCC or any Government
Antitrust Entity relating to this Agreement or any of the matters described in
this Section 5.8(b); and (vi) each of the Company and Parent shall permit the
other to review any material communication to be given by it to, and shall
consult with each other in advance of any telephonic calls, meeting or
conference with, the FCC or any Government Antitrust Entity and, to the extent
permitted, give the other party the opportunity to attend and participate in
such telephonic calls, meetings and conferences. Notwithstanding any of the
foregoing, no failure to obtain termination of the waiting period under the HSR
Act or consent of the FCC shall be deemed to be a breach hereunder by the
Company. Subject to the foregoing, Parent shall be principally responsible for
and in control of the process of dealing with the FCC or any Government
Antitrust Entity relating to its obligations under subsections (b) (iii) and (b)
(iv) hereof. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5.8(a) and 5.8(b), in the
event that either Parent or the Company is requested, as a condition to
obtaining the approval of the FCC to the transactions contemplated hereunder, to
take any action which arises from a material change in the Communications Act,
or in the policies of the FCC in implementing or enforcing the Communications
Act, which action if taken would have a Material Adverse Effect on the combined
consolidated businesses, assets or operations of Parent and Company, then
neither Parent nor the Company shall be required to take such action and no
failure by either Parent or the Company to take such actions shall be deemed a
breach of this Section 5.8 or of any other provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 5.9. Further Assurances. In case at any time after the Effective
Time any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement, the proper officers of the Company and Parent shall take all
such necessary action.
SECTION 5.10. No Inconsistent Activities. In light of the consideration
given by the Board of Directors of the Company prior to the execution of this
Agreement to, among other things, the transactions
A-23
<PAGE> 163
contemplated hereby, and to various alternatives to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, and in light of the Company's representations
contained in Section 3.14, the Company agrees that it shall not, nor shall it
permit any of its subsidiaries to, nor shall it authorize or expressly permit
any officer, director or employee of, or any investment banker, attorney or
other advisor or representative of, the Company or any of its subsidiaries to,
directly or indirectly, solicit or initiate, or encourage the submission of, any
Acquisition Proposal, or participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take any
other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that
constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, any Acquisition Proposal;
provided, however, that the foregoing shall not prohibit the Company's Board of
Directors from furnishing information to or entering into discussions or
negotiations with, any person or entity that makes an unsolicited bona fide
proposal to enter into a business combination with the Company pursuant to an
Acquisition Proposal which the Company's Board of Directors determines in good
faith is more favorable from a financial point of view to the Company's
stockholders than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (a "Superior
Proposal") so long as prior to furnishing such information to, or entering into
discussions or negotiations with, such a person or entity, the Company provides
two (2) business days' advance written notice to Parent to the effect that it is
furnishing information to, or entering into discussions or negotiations with, a
person or entity from whom the Company has received an executed confidentiality
agreement in form and substance similar to the Confidentiality Agreements. The
Company shall notify Parent orally and in writing of the fact that it received
inquiries, offers or proposals with respect to an Acquisition Proposal, within
24 hours after the Company obtains Knowledge of the receipt thereof, and shall
give Parent five (5) business days' advance notice (which notice shall include
the terms and conditions of such proposal) of any agreement to be entered into
with, or any information supplied to, any person or entity making such inquiry,
offer or proposal. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the Company from
disclosing to its shareholders the statement required by Rule 14e-2(a) under the
Exchange Act with respect to an Acquisition Proposal by means of a tender offer.
The Company will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing
activities, discussions or negotiations with any other person that have been
conducted heretofore with respect to a potential Acquisition Proposal. Except in
connection with a Superior Proposal, the Company agrees to enforce and not to
waive or release any confidentiality agreements which any persons have entered
into with the Company.
SECTION 5.11. Director and Officer Liability.
(a) Parent, Merger Sub and the Company agree that all rights to
indemnification and all limitations on liability existing in favor of any
Indemnitee (as defined below) as provided in the Company Certificate of
Incorporation, Company By-laws or any Indemnity Agreement (as defined below)
shall survive the Merger and continue in full force and effect. To the extent
permitted by (i) the DGCL, (ii) the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and
the Company's By-laws or (iii) any agreement providing for indemnification by
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company of any Indemnitee in effect on the
date of this Agreement (including any indemnity provisions contained in any
agreement providing for the registration of securities) (each, an "Indemnity
Agreement"), advancement of Expenses (as defined below) pursuant to this Section
5.11 shall be mandatory rather than permissive and the Surviving Corporation and
Parent shall advance Costs (as defined below) in connection with such
indemnification. Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation to,
expressly assume and honor in accordance with their terms all Indemnity
Agreements.
(b) For a period of six (6) years after the Effective Time, Parent shall,
or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, maintain officers' and directors'
liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance covering the Indemnitees
who are currently covered by the Company's existing officers' and directors' or
fiduciary liability insurance policies on terms no less advantageous to such
indemnified parties than such existing insurance; provided, however, that
neither Parent nor the Surviving Corporation will be required in order to
maintain such policies to pay an annual premium in excess of 150% of the greater
of (i) the last annual premium paid by the Company prior to the date of this
Agreement and (ii) the annual premium for the year in which the Closing occurs
(the "Cap"); and provided, further, that, if equivalent coverage cannot be
obtained, or can be obtained only by paying an annual premium in excess of the
Cap, then Parent shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, maintain
policies that, in Parent's good faith judgment, provide the maximum coverage
available at an annual premium equal to the Cap.
A-24
<PAGE> 164
(c) In addition to the other rights provided for in this Section 5.11 and
not in limitation thereof, for six years from and after the Effective Time,
Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law, (i) indemnify and hold harmless the
individuals who on or prior to the Effective Time were officers, directors or
employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and the heirs, executors,
trustees, fiduciaries and administrators of such officers, directors or
employees (collectively, the "Indemnitees") against all losses, Expenses (as
hereinafter defined), claims, damages, liabilities, judgments, or amounts paid
in settlement (collectively, "Costs") in respect to any threatened, pending or
completed claim, action, suit or proceeding, whether criminal, civil,
administrative or investigative based on, or arising out of or relating to the
fact that such person is or was a director, officer or employee of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries and arising out of acts or omissions occurring on or
prior to the Effective Time (including, without limitation, in respect of acts
or omissions in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby) (an "Indemnifiable Claim") and (ii) advance to such Indemnitees all
Expenses incurred in connection with any Indemnifiable Claim promptly after
receipt of reasonably detailed statements therefor; provided, that, except as
otherwise provided pursuant to any Indemnity Agreement, the person to whom
Expenses are to be advanced provides an undertaking to repay such advances if it
is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification
from Parent or the Surviving Corporation. In the event any Indemnifiable Claim
is asserted or made within such six year period, all rights to indemnification
and advancement of Expenses in respect of any such Indemnifiable Claim shall
continue until such Indemnifiable Claim is disposed of or all judgments, orders,
decrees or other rulings in connection with such Indemnifiable Claim are fully
satisfied; provided, however, that Parent shall not be liable for any settlement
effected without its written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed). Except as otherwise may be provided pursuant to any
Indemnity Agreement, the Indemnitees as a group may retain only one law firm
with respect to each related matter except to the extent there is, in the
opinion of counsel to an Indemnitee, under applicable standards of professional
conduct, a conflict on any significant issue between positions of any two or
more Indemnitees. For the purposes of this Section 5.11, "Expenses" shall
include reasonable attorneys' fees and all other costs, charges and expenses
paid or incurred in connection with investigating, defending, being a witness in
or participating in (including on appeal), or preparing to defend, be a witness
in or participate in any Indemnifiable Claim.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provisions hereof, the obligations of the
Company, the Surviving Corporation and Parent contained in this Section 5.11
shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of Parent and the Surviving
Corporation. In the event the Company or the Surviving Corporation or any of
their respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any
other Person or (ii) transfers all or substantially all of its properties or
assets to any Person, then, and in each case, proper provision shall be made so
that successors and assigns of the Company or the Surviving Corporation, as the
case may be, honor the indemnification obligations set forth in this Section
5.11.
(e) The obligations of the Company, the Surviving Corporation, and Parent
under this Section 5.11 shall survive the consummation of the Merger and shall
not be terminated or modified in such a manner as to adversely affect any
Indemnitee to whom this Section 5.11 applies without the consent of such
affected Indemnitee (it being expressly agreed that the Indemnitees to whom this
Section 5.11 applies shall be third party beneficiaries of this Section 5.11,
each of whom may enforce the provisions of this Section 5.11).
(f) Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, advance all
Expenses to any Indemnitee incurred enforcing the indemnity or other obligations
provided for in this Section 5.11.
SECTION 5.12. Accountants' "Comfort" Letters. The Company and Parent will
each use reasonable best efforts to cause to be delivered to each other letters
from their respective independent accountants, dated a date within two business
days before the effective date of the Registration Statement, in form reasonably
satisfactory to the recipient and customary in scope for comfort letters
delivered by independent accountants in connection with registration statements
on Form S-4 under the Securities Act.
SECTION 5.13. Additional Reports. The Company and Parent shall each furnish
to the other copies of any reports of the type referred to in Sections 3.4 and
4.4 which it files with the SEC on or after the date hereof, and the Company and
Parent, as the case may be, represents and warrants that as of the respective
A-25
<PAGE> 165
dates thereof, such reports will not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary
to make the statement therein, in light of the circumstances under which they
were made, not misleading; provided, that the foregoing shall not apply to the
financial statements contained therein (which are covered by the following
sentence). Any consolidated financial statements included in such reports
(including any related notes and schedules) will fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company and its consolidated
Subsidiaries or Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries, as the case may be, as
of the dates thereof and their results of operations and changes in financial
position or other information included therein for the periods or as of the date
then ended (subject, where appropriate, to normal year-end adjustments), in each
case in accordance with GAAP consistently applied during the periods involved
(except as otherwise disclosed in the notes thereto and except that such
financial statements will not include all of the notes required by GAAP).
SECTION 5.14. Plan of Reorganization. This Agreement is intended to
constitute a "plan of reorganization" within the meaning of Section 1.368-2(g)
of the income tax regulations promulgated under the Code. From and after the
date of this Agreement and until the Effective Time, each party hereto shall use
its reasonable efforts to cause the Merger to qualify, and will not knowingly
take any actions or cause any actions to be taken which could prevent the Merger
from qualifying, as a reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of
the Code. Following the Effective Time, neither the Surviving Corporation,
Parent nor any of their affiliates shall knowingly take any action or knowingly
cause any action to be taken which would cause the Merger to fail to qualify as
a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code.
SECTION 5.15. Conveyance Taxes. Each of Parent and the Company,
respectively, shall timely pay any real property transfer or gains, sales, use,
transfer, value added, stock transfer and stamp taxes, any transfer, recording,
registration and other fees, and any similar taxes or fees not including any
income tax, gross receipt tax or any similar tax measured with respect to gross
or net income (collectively, the "Conveyance Taxes") imposed on it at or prior
to the Effective Time in connection with the transactions contemplated hereunder
that are required to be paid in connection therewith. Parent and the Company
shall cooperate in the preparation, execution and filing of all Tax Returns,
questionnaires, applications, or other documents regarding any such Conveyance
Taxes.
SECTION 5.16. Public Announcements. The initial press release relating to
this Agreement shall be a joint press release mutually agreed upon by Parent and
the Company. Unless otherwise required by applicable law or the requirements of
any listing agreement with any applicable stock exchange, Parent and the Company
shall each use their reasonable efforts to consult with each other before
issuing any press release or otherwise making any public statements with respect
to this Agreement or any transaction contemplated by this Agreement and shall
not issue any such press release or make any such public statement prior to such
consultation.
SECTION 5.17. Employee Plans and Benefits and Employment Contracts
(a) From and after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation and its
Subsidiaries will honor in accordance with their terms all existing employment,
severance, consulting and salary continuation agreements between the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries and any current or former officer, director, employee or
consultant of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or group of such officers,
directors, employees or consultants.
(b) Until December 31, 1999, the Surviving Corporation and its Subsidiaries
will continue to provide to current and former employees of the Company or its
Subsidiaries (excluding employees covered by collective bargaining agreements)
the employee compensation, benefit plans, severance benefits, programs, policies
and arrangements, that are currently being provided by the Company and its
Subsidiaries to such employees and former employees. Furthermore, the Company's
401(k) plan shall not thereafter be merged into Parent's 401(k) plan nor shall
Parent's 401(k) plan be merged into the Company's 401(k) plan unless and until a
closing agreement has been entered into with the Internal Revenue Service
providing that Parent's 401(k) plan qualifies under Section 401(a) of the Code
through the date of such closing agreement. Nothing in this Section 5.17(b)
shall be deemed to prevent the Surviving Corporation or any of its Subsidiaries
from making any change required by law.
A-26
<PAGE> 166
(c) To the extent permitted under applicable law, each employee of the
Company or its Subsidiaries shall be given credit for all service with the
Company or its Subsidiaries (or service credited by the Company or its
Subsidiaries) under all employee benefit plans, programs, policies and
arrangements maintained by the Surviving Corporation in which they participate
or in which they become participants for purposes of eligibility, vesting and
benefit accrual including, without limitation, for purposes of determining (i)
short-term and long-term disability benefits; (ii) severance benefits; (iii)
vacation benefits; and (iv) benefits under any retirement plan.
(d) This Section 5.17, which shall survive the consummation of the Merger
at the Effective Time and shall continue without limit, is intended to benefit
and bind the Company, Parent, the Surviving Corporation and any person or entity
referenced in this Section 5.17, each of whom may enforce the provisions of this
Section 5.17 (whether or not parties to this Agreement).
ARTICLE VI.
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
SECTION 6.1. Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party. The obligations
of the Company, Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Merger are subject to
the satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of the following
conditions:
(a) Registration Statement. The Registration Statement shall have become
effective under the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the
effectiveness of the Registration Statement shall have been issued by the SEC
and no proceeding for that purpose shall have been initiated by the SEC.
(b) Stockholder Approvals. This Agreement shall have been approved by the
requisite affirmative vote of the stockholders of the Company in accordance with
the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the DGCL. The
issuance of Parent Common Stock in the Merger shall have been approved by the
requisite affirmative vote of the stockholders of Parent.
(c) No Injunction or Restraint. No statute, rule, regulation, executive
order, decree, preliminary or permanent injunction or restraining order shall
have been enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any Governmental Entity
which prohibits the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. No
action or proceeding (other than any action or proceeding pursuant to or in
connection with the Antitrust Laws) by any Governmental Entity shall have been
commenced (and be pending), or, to the knowledge of the parties hereto,
threatened, against the Company or Parent or any of their respective affiliates,
partners, associates, officers or directors, or any officers or directors of
such partners, seeking to prevent or delay the transactions contemplated hereby
or challenging any of the terms of provisions of this Agreement or seeking
material damages in connection therewith.
(d) Consents. All consents and approvals (other than any consent or
approval required pursuant to or in connection with the Antitrust Laws) of
Governmental Entities (other than the FCC) necessary for consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby shall have been obtained, other than those
which, if not obtained, would not in the aggregate have a Material Adverse
Effect.
(e) HSR Act. Any waiting period (and any extension thereof) applicable to
the consummation of the Merger under the HSR Act shall have expired or been
terminated.
(f) Communications Act. All orders and approvals of the FCC required in
connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall
have been obtained or made, whether or not any appeal or request for
reconsideration of such order is pending, or whether the time for filing any
such appeal or request for reconsideration or for any sua sponte action by the
FCC has expired.
(g) Stock Exchange Listing. The shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued
in the Merger shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE, subject to
official notice of listing.
(h) Tax Opinion. Each of the Company and Parent shall have received an
opinion of its tax counsel, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, and Akin, Gump,
Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., respectively, in form
A-27
<PAGE> 167
and substance reasonably satisfactory to it, and dated on or about the Closing
Date, to the effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations and
assumptions set forth in such opinions which are consistent with the state of
the facts existing at the Closing Date, the Merger will qualify for federal
income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code, that the Company, Parent and Merger Sub will each be a "party to the
reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code, and that
accordingly none of the Company, Parent and Merger Sub shall recognize gain or
loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of the Merger and stockholders
of the Company will not recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes
except to the extent they receive cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent
Common Stock. In rendering such opinions, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton and
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. may require and rely as to factual
matters, exclusively and without independent verification, upon representations
and covenants of officers of the Company and Parent substantially in the form of
Exhibits A and B.
SECTION 6.2. Conditions to the Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. The
obligations of Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Merger are subject to the
satisfaction or waiver by Parent on or prior to the Closing Date of the
following further conditions:
(a) Company Representations and Warranties. The representations and
warranties of the Company contained herein shall be true and correct in all
respects as of the Effective Time with the same effect as though made as of the
Effective Time except for such exceptions and qualifications which, in the
aggregate, for all such representations and warranties would not have a Material
Adverse Effect on the Company and except (i) for changes specifically permitted
by the terms of this Agreement and (ii) that the accuracy of representations and
warranties that by their terms speak as of the date of this Agreement or some
other date will be determined as of such date.
(b) The Company shall have performed in all material respects all material
obligations and complied in all material respects with all material agreements
and covenants required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by it
prior to the Effective Time.
(c) The Company shall have delivered to Parent a certificate, dated the
Effective Time and signed by its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer or a Senior Vice President, certifying to both such effects.
SECTION 6.3. Conditions to the Obligations of the Company. The obligations
of the Company to consummate the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or
waiver by the Company on or prior to the Closing Date of the following further
conditions:
(a) Parent and Merger Sub Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub contained herein shall
be true and correct in all respects as of the Effective Time with the same
effect as though made as of the Effective Time except for such exceptions and
qualifications which, in the aggregate, for all such representations and
warranties would not have a Material Adverse Effect on Parent and except (i) for
changes specifically permitted by the terms of this Agreement and (ii) that the
accuracy of representations and warranties that by their terms speak as of the
date of this Agreement or some other date will be determined as of such date.
(b) Parent shall have performed in all material respects all material
obligations and complied in all material respects with all material agreements
and covenants required by this Agreement to be performed or complied with by it
prior to the Effective Time.
(c) Parent shall have delivered to the Company a certificate, dated the
Effective Time and signed by its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer or a Senior Vice President, certifying to both such effects.
A-28
<PAGE> 168
ARTICLE VII.
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
SECTION 7.1. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time
prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after approval by the
shareholders of the Company or of Parent:
(a) by mutual written consent of Parent and the Company, if the Board of
Directors of each so determines by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
members its entire Board of Directors;
(b) by Parent (provided that Parent is not then in material breach of any
representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained herein), upon a
breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of the
Company set forth in this Agreement, or if any representation or warranty of the
Company shall have become untrue, in either case continuing ten (10) days
following notice to the Company of such breach or untruth and of a nature such
that the conditions set forth in Section 6.2(a) or Section 6.2(b), as the case
may be, would be incapable of being satisfied by October 8, 1999; provided that,
in any case, a willful breach shall be deemed to cause such conditions to be
incapable of being satisfied for purposes of this Section 7.1(b);
(c) by the Company (provided that the Company is not then in material
breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained
herein), upon a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement on
the part of Parent or Merger Sub set forth in this Agreement, or if any
representation or warranty of Parent or Merger Sub shall have become untrue, in
either case continuing ten (10) days following notice to Parent of such breach
or untruth and of a nature such that the conditions set forth in Section 6.3(a)
or Section 6.3(b), as the case may be, would be incapable of being satisfied by
October 8, 1999; provided that, in any case a willful breach shall be deemed to
cause such conditions to be incapable of being satisfied for purposes of this
Section 7.1(c);
(d) by either Parent or the Company (provided that the party seeking to so
terminate this Agreement is not then in material breach of Section 5.4(a)(iii)
or 5.8) if any Governmental Entity shall have issued an order, decree or ruling
or taken any other action permanently enjoining, restraining or otherwise
prohibiting the consummation of the Merger and such order, decree or filing or
other action shall have become final and nonappealable;
(e) by either Parent or the Company, if the Merger shall not have occurred
by October 8, 1999, unless the failure to consummate the Merger is the result of
a breach of covenant set forth in this Agreement or material breach of any
representation or warranty set forth in this Agreement by the party seeking to
terminate this Agreement;
(f) by either Parent or the Company (provided that if the terminating party
is the Company, the Company shall not be in material breach of any of its
obligations hereunder) if any approval of the shareholders of the Company
required for the consummation of the Merger shall not have been obtained by
reason of the failure to obtain the required vote at the Company Special Meeting
or at any adjournment or postponement thereof;
(g) by either Parent or the Company (provided that if the terminating party
is Parent, Parent shall not be in material breach of any of its obligations
hereunder) if any approval of the shareholders of Parent required for the
consummation of the Merger shall not have been obtained by reason of the failure
to obtain the required vote at the Parent Special Meeting or at any adjournment
or postponement thereof;
(h) by the Company, if, prior to approval of the Merger by its
shareholders, a Superior Proposal has been made; provided, however, that before
the Company may terminate this Agreement pursuant to this subsection 7.1(h), the
Company shall give notice to Parent of the proposed termination under subsection
7.1(h) (which notice may be the notice provided under Section 5.10) and Parent,
within five (5) days of receipt of such notice, shall have the right, in its
sole discretion, to offer to amend this Agreement to provide for terms
substantially similar to those of the Superior Proposal and the Company shall
negotiate in good faith with Parent with respect to such proposed amendment;
provided, further, that if Parent and the Company are
A-29
<PAGE> 169
unable to reach an agreement with respect to the Parent's proposed amendment
within such five (5) day period, the Company may terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this subsection 7.1(h);
(i) by Parent, if the Board of Directors of the Company (i) withdraws or
modifies adversely its recommendation of the Merger, (ii) recommends an
Acquisition Proposal to Company shareholders or (iii) fails to call or hold the
Company Special Meeting by reason of the receipt by the Company of an
Acquisition Proposal; provided, that the parties agree that disclosure made by
the Company regarding an Acquisition Proposal shall not, unless expressly
stated, be treated as or deemed to be a withdrawal or adverse modification of
any favorable recommendation of the Merger by the Board of Directors of the
Company;
(j) by the Company upon notice to Parent, authorized by the Board of
Directors of the Company and delivered to Parent on one of the two trading days
prior to the Closing Date if the Average Closing Price is less than or equal to
$37.50 (the "Walk-Away Price"); or
(k) by the Company upon notice to Parent, authorized by the Board of
Directors of the Company and delivered to Parent at any time, if for a
twenty-five (25) consecutive trading day period commencing after the date of
this Agreement and ending within 5 trading days of such notice the average of
the closing prices for Parent Common Stock on the NYSE Composite Transaction
Tape (as reported in The Wall Street Journal or, if not reported thereby, any
other authoritative source) is less than or equal to the Walk-Away Price.
SECTION 7.2. Effect of Termination. In the event of termination of this
Agreement by either the Company or Parent as provided in Section 7.1, this
Agreement shall forthwith become void and have no effect, without any liability
or obligation on the part of Parent, Sub or the Company or their respective
officers or directors, except as set forth in the last sentence of Section 5.5,
Section 7.5 and Article VIII which shall survive termination and except to the
extent that such termination results from the breach by a party of any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth in this
Agreement.
SECTION 7.3. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties at any
time before or after approval hereof by the shareholders of the Company and
Parent; provided, however, that after such shareholder approval there shall not
be made any amendment that by law requires further approval by the shareholders
of the Company or Parent without the further approval of such shareholders. This
Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf
of each of the parties.
SECTION 7.4. Extension; Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time,
the parties may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the
obligations or other acts of the other parties, (b) waive any inaccuracies in
the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement or in any
document delivered pursuant to this Agreement or (c) subject to the proviso of
Section 7.3, waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained
in this Agreement. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such extension or
waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing, signed on
behalf of such party. The failure of any party to this Agreement to assert any
of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of
those rights.
SECTION 7.5. Termination Fee. (a) In the event (i) the Company terminates
this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(h) or (ii) Parent terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(i), then the Company shall pay Parent an
amount equal to One Hundred Fifteen Million Dollars ($115,000,000) (the
"Termination Fee") by wire transfer of immediately available funds upon the
occurrence of such event, and as a condition to termination in the case of
termination pursuant to Section 7.1(h).
(b) In the event (i) Company Stockholder Approval is not received, (ii)
prior to the Company Special Meeting there shall have been an Acquisition
Proposal made and (iii) within six (6) months from the termination of the
Agreement, the Company shall have entered into an agreement for, and within
eighteen (18) months from such termination shall have consummated, a transaction
substantially in the form proposed in such Acquisition Proposal with the party
that made such Acquisition Proposal, then the Company shall pay Parent an amount
equal to the Termination Fee by wire transfer of immediately available funds,
payable upon consummation of such transaction.
(c) The Company agrees that the agreements contained in this Section 7.5
are an integral part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
A-30
<PAGE> 170
(d) The payment by the Company of the Termination Fee pursuant to the
preceding sentence, shall be Parent's and Merger Sub's exclusive remedy against
the Company other than for a willful breach by the Company of Section 5.10.
SECTION 7.6. Procedure for Termination, Amendment, Extension or Waiver. A
termination of this Agreement or other action attributed to the Board of
Directors pursuant to Section 7.1, an amendment of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.3 or an extension or waiver pursuant to Section 7.4 shall, in order to
be effective, require in the case of Parent, Merger Sub or the Company, action
by its Board of Directors, acting by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
members of the entire Board of Directors.
ARTICLE VIII.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 8.1. Nonsurvival of Representations. None of the representations
and warranties in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this
Agreement shall survive the Effective Time. This Section 8.1 shall not limit any
covenant or agreement of the parties which by its terms contemplates performance
after the Effective Time.
SECTION 8.2. Notices. All notices, requests, claims, demands and other
communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
given if delivered personally or sent by facsimile transmission or overnight
courier (providing proof of delivery) to the parties at the following addresses
(or at such address for a party as shall be specified by like notice):
(a) if to the Company, to:
Jacor Communications, Inc.
50 E. RiverCenter Blvd.
Suite 1200
Covington, KY 41011
Attention: Randy Michaels
Facsimile No.: (606) 655-9354
with a copy to:
Graydon Head & Ritchey
511 Walnut Street
1900 Fifth Third Center
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Attention: Richard G. Schmalzl
Facsimile No.: (513) 651-3836
and to:
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
One Liberty Plaza
New York, New York 10006
Attention: William A. Groll
Facsimile No.: (212) 225-3999
(b) if to Parent or Merger Sub, to:
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attention: Randall Mays
Facsimile No.: (210) 822-2299
A-31
<PAGE> 171
with a copy to:
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.
1700 Pacific Avenue
Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attention: Ford Lacy, P.C.
Facsimile No.: (214) 969-4343
SECTION 8.3. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement:
(a) "Acquisition Proposal" means any proposal (whether or not in
writing and whether or not delivered to the Company's shareholders
generally) for a merger, consolidation, liquidation, reorganization, tender
offer or other business combination involving the Company or any proposal
or offer to acquire in any manner, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of
the voting securities of, or all or substantially all of the assets of, the
Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) "Affiliate" of any person means another person that directly or
indirectly, through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by,
or is under common control with, such first person.
(c) "Antitrust Laws" mean and include the Sherman Act, as amended, the
Clayton Act, as amended, the HSR Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, as
amended, and all other federal, state or foreign statutes, rules,
regulations, orders, decrees, administrative and judicial doctrines and
other laws that are designed or intended to prohibit, restrict or regulate
actions having the purpose or effect of monopolization or restraint of
trade.
(d) "Control" (including the terms "controlled by" and "under common
control with") means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power
to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a
person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or
otherwise.
(e) "Governmental Entity" means any government or any agency, bureau,
board, commission, court, department, official, political subdivision,
tribunal or other instrumentality of any government, whether federal, state
or local, domestic or foreign.
(f) "Knowledge", "Know" or "Known" means, with respect to the matter
in question, if any of the executive officers of the Company or Parent,
listed on Schedule 8.3(g) hereof, as the case may be, has actual knowledge
of such matter.
(g) "Lien" means any encumbrance, hypothecation, infringement, lien,
mortgage, pledge, restriction, security interest, title retention or other
security arrangement, or any adverse right or interest, charge or claim of
any nature whatsoever of, on, or with respect to any asset, property or
property interest; provided, however, that the term "lien" shall not
include (i) liens for water and sewer charges and current taxes not yet due
and payable or being contested in good faith, (ii) mechanics', carriers',
workers', repairers', materialmen's, warehousemen's and other similar liens
arising or incurred in the ordinary course of business (iii) all liens
approved in writing by the other party hereto or (iv) restrictions on
transfer imposed by federal or state securities laws.
(h) "Material Adverse Change" or "Material Adverse Effect" means, any
adverse change in the business, financial condition or results of
operations of the Company or Parent, as the case may be, or its respective
Subsidiaries that is material to the Company or Parent, as the case may be,
and its respective Subsidiaries taken as a whole, excluding any such
adverse change that is due to (i) any sales or dispositions or other
actions pursuant to Section 5.8 or (ii) the announcement or anticipated
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(i) "Person" means any natural person, firm, individual, business
trust, trust, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture,
company, unincorporated entity or Governmental Entity.
A-32
<PAGE> 172
(j) "Subsidiary" or "Subsidiaries" of any Person means another Person,
an amount of the voting securities, other voting ownership or voting
partnership interests of which is sufficient to elect at least a majority
of its board of directors or other governing body (or, if there are no such
voting interests, 50% or more of the equity interests of which) is owned
directly or indirectly by such first Person.
(k) "Taxes" means any and all federal, state, local, foreign or other
taxes of any kind (together with any and all interest, penalties, additions
to tax and additional amounts imposed with respect thereto) imposed by any
taxing authority, including, without limitation, taxes or other charges on
or with respect to income, franchises, windfall or other profits, gross
receipts, property, sales, use, transfer, capital stock, payroll,
employment, social security, workers' compensation, unemployment
compensation, or net worth, and taxes or other charges in the nature of
excise, withholding, ad valorem or value added.
(l) "Tax Return" means any return, report or similar statement
(including the attached schedules) required to be filed with respect to any
Tax, including, without limitation, any information return, claim for
refund, amended return or declaration of estimated Tax.
(m) "Warrant Agreements" shall mean the agreements between the Company
and Keycorp Shareholder Services Inc. dated September 18, 1996 and February
27, 1997.
SECTION 8.4. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of
the parties and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all
parties need not sign the same counterpart.
SECTION 8.5. Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement
constitutes the entire agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings, both written and oral, among the parties with respect to the
subject matter of this Agreement (provided, however, that the provisions of the
Confidentiality Agreements shall remain valid and in effect) and, except for the
provisions of Article II and Sections 5.7, 5.11 and 5.17, is not intended to
confer upon any person other than the parties any rights or remedies hereunder.
SECTION 8.6. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights,
interests or obligations under this Agreement shall be assigned, in whole or in
part, by operation of law or otherwise by any of the parties hereto without the
prior written consent of the other parties, except that Merger Sub may assign,
in its sole discretion, any or all of its rights, interests and obligations
under this Agreement to Parent or to any direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent, but no such assignment shall relieve Merger Sub of any of
its obligations under this Agreement. Subject to the preceding sentence, this
Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by,
the parties and their respective successors and assigns.
SECTION 8.7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard
to any applicable conflicts of law.
SECTION 8.8. Enforcement. The parties agree that irreparable damage would
occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It
is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement in any court of the United States
located in the State of Delaware or in Delaware state court, this being in
addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. In
addition, each of the parties hereto (a) consents to submit itself to the
personal jurisdiction of any federal court located in the State of Delaware or
any Delaware state court in the event any dispute arises out of this Agreement
or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (b) agrees that it
will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other
request for leave from any such court and (c) agrees that it will not bring any
action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement in any court other than a federal or state court sitting in the
State of Delaware.
SECTION 8.9. Severability. Any term or provision of this Agreement which is
invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be
ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability
A-33
<PAGE> 173
without rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of
this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this Agreement is
so broad as to be unenforceable, such provision shall be interpreted to be only
so broad as is enforceable.
SECTION 8.10. Interpretation. Headings of the Articles and Sections of this
Agreement are for convenience of the parties only, and shall be given no
substantive or interpretive effect whatsoever. The disclosure of any matter in
any section of a Disclosure Letter hereto shall not be deemed to constitute an
admission by any party or to otherwise imply that any such matter is material or
may have a Material Adverse Effect for purposes of this Agreement.
SECTION 8.11. Finders or Brokers. Except for DLJ and Equity Group
Investments, Inc., with respect to the Company, and SSB, with respect to Parent,
a copy of whose engagement agreements have been provided by the Company and
Parent to the other, neither the Company nor Parent nor any of their respective
Subsidiaries has employed any investment banker, broker, finder or intermediary
in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby who might be entitled to
any fee or any commission in connection with or upon consummation of the Merger.
A-34
<PAGE> 174
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have caused this
Agreement to be signed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized,
all as of the date first written above.
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ RANDALL MAYS
-------------------------------------
Name: Randall Mays
Title: Chief Financial Officer
CCU MERGER SUB, INC.
By: /s/ RANDALL MAYS
-------------------------------------
Name: Randall Mays
Title: Chief Financial Officer
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ R. CHRISTOPHER WEBER
-------------------------------------
Name: R. Christopher Weber
Title: Chief Financial Officer
A-35
<PAGE> 175
Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 11, 1998 (this "Amendment"), to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), dated as of October 8,
1998, among Clear Channel Communications, Inc., a Texas Corporation ("Parent"),
CCU Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Jacor Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Merger Agreement.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have entered into the Merger
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company desire to amend the Merger
Agreement, in accordance with Section 7.3 thereof, so that Merger Sub will be
the Surviving Corporation in the Merger and to make such other amendments as are
set forth herein;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements
and covenants hereinafter set forth, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company agree as
follows:
1. Amendment to Second Recital. The second Recital of the Merger Agreement
is hereby amended by deleting the words "Merger Sub to merge with and into the
Company" in the third line thereof and inserting in lieu thereof the words "the
Company to merge with and into Merger Sub."
2. Amendment to Section 1.1. Section 1.1 of the Merger Agreement is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows: "Upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Delaware General Corporation Law
(the "DGCL"), the Company shall be merged with and into Merger Sub at the
Effective Time (as defined in Section 1.3) of the Merger. Following the Merger,
the separate corporate existence of the Company shall cease, and Merger Sub
shall continue as the surviving corporation under the name Jacor Communications,
Inc. (the "Surviving Corporation") and shall succeed to and assume all the
rights and obligations of the Company in accordance with the DGCL."
3. Amendment to Section 2.1. Section 2.1 of the Merger Agreement is hereby
amended by deleting the words "be converted into and become" in the fourth and
fifth lines of Section 2.1 and inserting in lieu thereof the words "remain
outstanding as."
4. General Interpretation of Merger Agreement. All references in the Merger
Agreement to the Merger shall be deemed to be references to the merger of the
Company with and into Merger Sub, and all references in the Merger Agreement to
the Surviving Corporation shall be deemed to be references to Merger Sub as the
Surviving Corporation.
5. Amendment to Section 5.1. Section 5.1(a)(x) of the Merger Agreement is
hereby amended by inserting the words "and the 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Purchase Plan" after the words "Purchase Plan" in the third line thereof.
6. Amendment to Section 5.7. (a) Section 5.7(a) of the Merger Agreement is
hereby amended by inserting the words "and the non-qualified stock option
described in Section 3.2(n)" after the defined term "(the "Company Stock
Plans")."
(b) Section 5.7(d) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended by inserting
the words "and the 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Purchase Plan" after the
words "Purchase Plan" on the third line thereof and by inserting the words "or
director" after the word "employee" on the seventh line thereof.
7. Amendment to Exhibits A and B. Exhibits A and B to the Merger Agreement
are hereby amended to read in their entirety as the forms of Exhibit A and B
attached to this Amendment.
8. Authorization. Each party hereto represents to the other that such party
(a) has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this
Amendment; (b) the execution and delivery by each party hereto of this Amendment
have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action on the part of such
party; and (c) this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by each party
hereto.
A-36
<PAGE> 176
9. Merger Agreement Remains in Effect. Except as expressly amended by this
Amendment, the Merger Agreement remains in full force and effect and nothing in
this Amendment shall otherwise affect any other provision of the Merger
Agreement or the rights and obligations of the parties thereto.
10. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed to be an original but
all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
11. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to any
applicable conflicts of law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have caused this
Amendment to be signed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized,
all as of the date first written above.
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ KENNETH E. WYKER
----------------------------------
Name: Kenneth E. Wyker
Title: Senior Vice President
for Legal Affairs
CCU MERGER SUB, INC.
By: /s/ KENNETH E. WYKER
----------------------------------
Name: Kenneth E. Wyker
Title: Secretary
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ R. CHRISTOPHER WEBER
----------------------------------
Name: R. Christopher Weber
Title: Chief Financial Officer
A-37
<PAGE> 177
EXHIBIT A
November 10, 1998
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.
300 Convent Street, Suite 1500
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
One Liberty Plaza
New York, New York 10006
Dear Sirs:
On behalf of [TARGET] (the "Company"), the undersigned, in connection with
the opinions to be delivered by your firms pursuant to Section 6.1(h) of the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 8, 1998 (the "Agreement") among
Parent, Merger Sub and the Company,(1) recognizing that each of you will rely on
this certificate in delivering said opinions, hereby certifies that the
descriptions of the facts contained in the Registration Statement and the Proxy
Statement completely and accurately describe the Merger and the transactions
leading up thereto and further that:
1. The Merger will be consummated solely in compliance with the
material terms and conditions of the Agreement and none of the material
terms and conditions thereof have been waived or modified.
2. The value of the Continuing Proprietary Interest (as defined
below), as of the Effective Time, will be at least 50 percent of the value,
as of the Effective Time, of the Existing Proprietary Interest (as defined
below) of the Company. For purposes of this paragraph 2:
(a) The Continuing Proprietary Interest means all of the shares of
outstanding Company Common Stock as of the Effective Time, other than
shares of Company Common Stock: (i) exchanged in the Merger for
consideration other than Parent Common Stock, but not including shares
of Company Common Stock surrendered by Parent in exchange for a direct
interest in the Company, (ii) acquired in connection with the Merger
(other than in exchange for Parent Common Stock) by Parent or by a
person related to Parent (within the meaning of Treasury Regulations
Section 1.368-1(e)(3)), (iii) exchanged in the Merger for Parent Company
stock that, pursuant to a plan or intent existing as of the Effective
Time, is either redeemed by Parent or acquired (other than in exchange
of Parent Common Stock) by a person related to Parent (within the
meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.368-1(e)(3)), or (iv) acquired
prior to the Effective Time and in connection with the Merger by persons
related to the Company (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation
Section 1.368-1(e)(3)(i)(B)), other than in exchange for Parent Common
Stock;
(b) The Existing Proprietary Interest means: (i) all of the shares
of outstanding Company Common Stock as of the Effective Time (including
shares acquired prior to the Effective Time and in connection with the
Merger by persons related to the Company (within the meaning of Treasury
Regulations Section 1.368-1(e)(3)(i)(B)), (ii) shares of Company Common
Stock redeemed prior to the Effective Time and in connection with the
Merger, and (iii) the amount of any extraordinary distributions made by
the Company with respect to the Company Common Stock prior to the
Effective Time and in connection with the Merger. For purposes of this
paragraph 2(b), extraordinary distributions will not include periodic
dividends that are consistent with the Company's historic dividend
practice;
- ---------------
(1) For purposes of this certificate, capitalized terms used and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Agreement.
A-38
<PAGE> 178
(c) An acquisition of Parent Common Stock or Company Common Stock
by a person acting as an intermediary for Parent or the Company, or a
person related to Parent or the Company (within the meaning of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.368-1(e)(3)) will be treated as made by Parent,
Company or the related person, respectively; and
(d) Any reference to Parent or Company includes a reference to any
successor or predecessor of such corporation to the extent provided in
Treasury Regulation Section 1.368-1(e)(5).
3. The Company and the stockholders of the Company will each pay their
respective expenses, if any, incurred in connection with the Merger.
4. Merger Sub will acquire at least 90 percent of the fair market
value of the net assets and at least 70 percent of the fair market value of
the gross assets that the Company held immediately prior to the Merger
(including the sales proceeds from any disposition of any assets prior to
or subsequent to the Merger and in contemplation thereof). For purposes of
this representation, Company assets used to pay its reorganization expenses
and all redemptions and distributions (except for regular, normal
dividends) made by the Company immediately preceding or in contemplation
of, the Merger will be included as assets of the Company prior to the
Merger.
5. Except as provided in Annex I attached herewith, immediately prior
to the time of the Merger, the Company will not have outstanding any
warrants, options, convertible securities or any other type of right
pursuant to which any person could acquire Company Common Stock.
6. The Company is not an investment company as defined in Section
368(a)(2)(F)(iii) and (iv) of the Code.
7. The Company will not take, and the Company is not aware of any plan
or intention of Company stockholders to take, any position on any federal,
state or local income or franchise tax return, or take any other tax
reporting position, that is inconsistent with the treatment of the Merger
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code,
unless otherwise required by a "determination" (as defined in Section
1313(a)(1) of the Code) or by applicable state or local income or franchise
tax law.
8. None of the compensation received by any stockholder-employee of
the Company in respect of periods at or prior to the Effective Time
represents separate consideration for, or is allocable to, any of their
Company Common Stock. None of the Parent Common Stock that will be received
by company stockholder-employees in the Merger represents separately
bargained-for consideration which is allocable to any employment agreement
or arrangement. The compensation paid to any shareholder-employees will be
for services actually rendered and will be determined by bargaining at
arm's-length.
9. There is no intercorporate indebtedness existing between Parent and
the Company or between Merger Sub and the Company that was issued or
acquired, or will be settled, at a discount.
10. The Company is not under jurisdiction of a court in a Title 11 or
similar case within the meaning of Section 368(a)(3)(A) of the Code.
11. The Agreement and the documents described in Section 5.5 of the
Agreement represent the entire understanding of the Company, Parent and
Merger Sub with respect to the Merger.
12. The Company Common Stock will be surrendered pursuant to the
Merger in an arms-length exchange, and the Parent Common Stock received in
exchange therefor represents the sole bargained-for consideration therefor.
The fair market value of the Parent Common Stock received by each holder of
Company Common Stock will be approximately equal to the fair market value
of the Company Common Stock surrendered in the Merger.
13. There will be no dissenters to the Merger.
14. On the date of the merger, the fair market value of the assets of
the Company will exceed the sum of its liabilities plus the liabilities, if
any, to which the assets are subject.
A-39
<PAGE> 179
15. The liabilities of the Company assumed by Merger Sub and the
liabilities to which the transferred assets of the Company are subject were
incurred by the Company in the ordinary course of its business.
16. The Company has no reason to believe that the certifications made
by Parent in the letter dated the date hereof and attached hereto as
Exhibit A are not true, correct and complete in all material respects. It
is understood for purposes of this representation that the Company has
neither investigated nor verified the accuracy of such Parent
certifications.
I understand that Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton as counsel for the
Company and Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. as counsel for Parent will
rely on this certificate in rendering their respective opinions concerning
certain of the federal income tax consequences of the Merger and hereby commit
to inform them if, for any reason, any of the foregoing representations becomes
untrue, incorrect or incomplete at or prior to the Effective Time.
[TARGET]
By:
------------------------------------
[TARGET OFFICER]
[TARGET OFFICER'S POSITION]
A-40
<PAGE> 180
EXHIBIT B
November 10, 1998
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.
300 Convent Street, Suite 1500
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
One Liberty Plaza
New York, New York 10006
Dear Sirs:
On behalf of Parent and Merger Sub, the undersigned, in connection with the
opinions to be delivered by your firms pursuant to Section 6.1(h) of the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 8, 1998 (the "Agreement") among
Parent, Merger Sub and the Company,((2)) recognizing that each of you will rely
on this certificate in delivering said opinions, hereby certifies that the
descriptions of the facts contained in the Registration Statement and the Proxy
Statement completely and accurately describe the Merger and the transactions
leading up thereto and further that:
1. The Merger will be consummated solely in compliance with the
material terms and conditions of the Agreement and none of the material
terms and conditions thereof have been waived or modified.
2. Cash payments to be made to stockholders of the Company in lieu of
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock that would otherwise be issued to
such stockholders in the Merger will be made for the purpose of saving
Parent the expense and inconvenience of issuing and transferring fractional
shares of Parent Common Stock, and do not represent separately bargained
for consideration.
3. Prior to the Merger, Parent will own all of the capital stock of
Merger Sub. Parent has no plan or intention to cause Merger Sub to issue
additional shares of its stock that would result in Parent owning less than
all of the capital stock of Merger Sub after the Merger.
4. Parent has no plan or intention, following the Merger, directly or
indirectly, to reacquire any of the Parent Common Stock issued in the
Merger.
5. Following the Merger, the qualified group, as defined in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.368-1(d)(4)(ii), of which Parent is a member, will
continue the Company's historic business or use a significant portion of
its historic business assets in a business.
6. Parent and Merger Sub will each pay their respective expenses, if
any, incurred in connection with this Merger.
7. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub is an investment company as defined in
Section 368(a)(2)(F)(iii) and (iv) of the Code.
8. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub will take any position on any
federal, state or local income or franchise tax return, or take any other
tax reporting position, that is inconsistent with the treatment of the
Merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code, unless otherwise required by a "determination" (as defined in Section
1313(a)(1) of the Code) or by applicable state or local income or franchise
tax law.
- ---------------
(2)For purposes of this certificate, capitalized terms used and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Agreement.
A-41
<PAGE> 181
9. None of the compensation received by any stockholder-employee of
the Company in respect of periods after the Effective Time represents
separate consideration for, or is allocable to, any of their Company Common
Stock. None of the Parent Common Stock that will be received by Company
stockholder-employees in the Merger represents separately bargained-for
consideration that is allocable to any employment agreement or arrangement.
The compensation paid to any shareholder-employees will be for services
actually rendered and will be determined by bargaining at arm's-length.
10. No stock of Merger Sub will be issued in the Merger.
11. There is no intercorporate indebtedness existing between Parent
and the Company or between Merger Sub and the Company that was issued or
acquired, or will be settled, at a discount.
12. The Agreement and the documents described in Section 5.5 of the
Agreement represent the entire understanding of the Company, Parent and
Merger Sub with respect to the Merger.
13. Merger Sub will acquire at least 90 percent of the fair market
value of the net assets and at least 70 percent of the fair market value of
the gross assets that the Company held immediately prior to the Merger
(including the sales proceeds from any disposition of any assets prior to
or subsequent to the Merger and in contemplation thereof). For purposes of
this representation, Company assets used to pay its reorganization expenses
and all redemptions and distributions (except for regular, normal
dividends) made by the Company immediately preceding or in contemplation
of, the Merger will be included as assets of the Company prior to the
Merger.
14. Parent will not assume any liabilities of the Company or any of
the Company's Subsidiaries.
15. The Company Common Stock will be surrendered pursuant to the
Merger in an arms-length exchange, and the Parent Common Stock received in
exchange therefor represents the sole bargained-for consideration therefor.
The fair market value of the Parent Common Stock received by each holder of
Company Common Stock will be approximately equal to the fair market value
of the Company Common Stock surrendered in the Merger.
16. There will be no dissenters to the Merger.
17. Parent has no plan or intention to liquidate Merger Sub; to merge
Merger Sub with or into another corporation; to sell or otherwise dispose
of the capital stock of Merger Sub except for transfers of stock described
in Treasury Regulation Section 1.368-2(k)(2); or to cause Merger Sub to
sell or otherwise dispose of any of the assets acquired from the Company,
except for dispositions in the ordinary course of business or transfers
described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.368-2(k)(2).
18. Parent has no reason to believe that the certifications made by
the Company in the letter dated the date hereof and attached hereto as
Exhibit A are not true, correct and complete in all material respects. It
is understood for purposes of this representation that Parent has neither
investigated nor verified the accuracy of such Company certifications.
I understand that Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton as counsel for the
Company and Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. as counsel for Parent will
rely on this certificate in rendering their opinion concerning certain federal
income tax consequences of the Merger and hereby commit to inform them if, for
any reason, any of the foregoing representations becomes untrue, incorrect or
incomplete at or prior to the Effective Time.
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By:
----------------------------------------
Its:
----------------------------------------
A-42
<PAGE> 182
ANNEX B
VOTING AGREEMENT
This VOTING AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of October 8, 1998, is
entered into by and among Jacor Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), and the other parties listed on the signature page hereof
(collectively, the "Stockholders" and, individually, a "Stockholder").
WHEREAS, the Company, Clear Channel Communications, Inc. ("Parent"), and
CCU Merger Sub, Inc. ("Merger Sub") have entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger of even date herewith (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which the
parties thereto have agreed, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth therein, to merge Merger Sub with and into the Company (the "Merger");
WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, each of the Stockholders is the owner of
the number of shares (the "Shares") of common stock, par value $0.10 per share,
of Parent ("Parent Common Stock") set forth opposite such Stockholder's name on
Schedule I attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, as a condition to its willingness to enter into the Merger
Agreement, the Company has required that the Stockholders agree, and each of the
Stockholders hereby agrees, to the matters set forth herein. Except as specified
herein, terms defined in the Merger Agreement are used herein as defined
therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the agreements set
forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Voting of Shares.
1.1. Voting Agreement. Each of the Stockholders hereby agrees to vote
(or cause to be voted) all of such Stockholder's Shares (and any and all
securities issued or issuable in respect thereof) which such Stockholder is
entitled to vote (or to provide his written consent thereto), at any
annual, special or other meeting of the stockholders of Parent, and at any
adjournment or adjournments thereof, or pursuant to any consent in lieu of
a meeting or otherwise:
(i) in favor of the Merger and the approval of the issuance of
Parent Common Stock in the Merger (the "Parent Proposal") and any
actions required in furtherance thereof;
(ii) against any action or agreement that is reasonably likely to
result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant,
representation or warranty or any other obligation of Parent under this
Agreement or the Merger Agreement; and
(iii) except for all such actions which may be permitted to Parent
under Section 5.1(b) of the Merger Agreement, against (A) any
extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, rights offering,
reorganization, recapitalization or liquidation involving Parent or any
of its subsidiaries other than the Merger, (B) a sale or transfer of a
material amount of assets of Parent or any of its material subsidiaries
or the issuance of any securities of Parent or any subsidiary, (C) any
change in the Board of Directors of Parent other than in connection with
an annual meeting of the shareholders of Parent with respect to the
slate of directors proposed by the incumbent Board of Directors of
Parent (in which case they agree to vote for the slate proposed by the
incumbent Board) or (D) any action that is reasonably likely to
materially impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or adversely affect
in any material respect the Merger and the transaction contemplated by
the Merger Agreement.
2. Representations and Warranties of Stockholders. Each of the Stockholders
severally represents and warrants to the Company as follows in each case as of
the date hereof:
2.1. Binding Agreement. The Stockholder has the capacity and full
power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate
the transactions contemplated hereby. The Stockholder has duly and validly
executed and delivered this Agreement and this Agreement constitutes a
legal, valid and binding obligation of the Stockholder, enforceable against
the Stockholder in accordance with its
B-1
<PAGE> 183
terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting
creditors' rights generally and by general equitable principles (regardless
of whether enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at
law).
2.2. No Conflict. Neither the execution and delivery of this
Agreement, nor the compliance with any of the provisions hereof in each
case by the Stockholder (a) require any consent, approval, authorization or
permit of, registration, declaration or filing (except for filings under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) with,
or notification to, any governmental entity, (b) result in a default (or an
event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become a default)
or give rise to any right of termination by any third party, cancellation,
amendment or acceleration under any material contract, agreement,
instrument, commitment, arrangement or understanding, or result in the
creation of a security interest, lien, charge, encumbrance, equity or claim
with respect to any of the Shares, (c) require any material consent,
authorization or approval of any person other than a governmental entity
which has not been obtained, or (d) violate or conflict with any order,
writ, injunction, decree or law applicable to such Stockholder or the
Shares.
2.3. Ownership of Shares. Except as set forth in Schedule II and
except as may be provided in the organizational documents, if any, of the
Stockholder, the Stockholder is the record and beneficial owner of the
Shares free and clear of any security interests, liens, charges,
encumbrances, options or restriction on the right to vote the Shares. The
Stockholder holds exclusive power to vote the Shares, subject to the
limitations set forth in Section 1 of this Agreement. The Shares represent
all of the shares of capital stock of Parent beneficially owned by
Stockholder.
3. Representations and Warranties of the Company. The Company represents
and warrants to each of the Stockholders as follows in each case as of the date
hereof:
3.1. Binding Agreement. The Company is a corporation duly
incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
State of Delaware and has full corporate power and authority to execute and
deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the Merger
Agreement by the Company and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby have been duly and validly authorized by
the Board of Directors of the Company, and no other corporate proceedings
on the part of the Company except for the approval and adoption of the
Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by a majority of the holders of
shares of Company common stock are necessary to authorize the execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Merger Agreement by the
Company and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby. The
Company has duly and validly executed this Agreement and this Agreement
constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company,
enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except as
such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization or other similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally
and by general equitable principles (regardless of whether enforceability
is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law).
3.2. No Conflict. Neither the execution and delivery of this
Agreement, the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated
hereby, nor the compliance by the Company with any of the provisions hereof
will (a) conflict with or result in a breach of any provision of its
Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws, (b) require any consent, approval,
authorization or permit of, registration, declaration or filing (except for
filings under the Exchange Act) with, or notification to, any governmental
entity, (c) result in a default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of
time or both, would become a default) or give rise to any right of
termination by any third party, cancellation, amendment or acceleration
under any contract, agreement, instrument, commitment, arrangement or
understanding, (d) require any material consent, authorization or approval
of any person other than a governmental entity, or (e) violate or conflict
with any order, writ, injunction, decree or law applicable to the Company.
B-2
<PAGE> 184
4. Transfer and Other Restrictions. For so long as the Merger Agreement is
in effect:
4.1. Certain Prohibited Transfers. Each of the Stockholders generally
agrees not to:
(a) sell, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of, or enter into
any contract, option or other arrangement or understanding with respect
to the sale, transfer, assignment or other disposition of, the Shares or
any interest contained therein if (i) such sale, transfer, assignment or
other disposition, taken together with all other sales, transfers,
assignments or other dispositions by the Stockholders, as a group,
during the period from the date hereof through the date of the meeting
held to consider the Parent Proposal, would be of shares in an amount in
excess of 1% of the Parent Common Stock then outstanding or (ii) such
sale, transfer, assignment or other disposition is reasonably likely to
impact the Average Closing Price (as defined in the Merger Agreement);
(b) except as contemplated by this Agreement, grant any proxies or
power of attorney or enter into a voting agreement or other arrangement
with respect to the Shares, other than this Agreement;
(c) deposit the Shares into a voting trust; nor
(d) buy, sell or trade any equity security of Parent including,
without limitation, entering into any put, call, option, swap or collar
derivative transaction which has a similar economic effect if such
purchase, sale or trade is reasonably likely to impact the Average
Closing Price.
4.2. Additional Shares. Without limiting the provisions of the Merger
Agreement, in the event of (i) any stock dividend, stock split,
recapitalization, reclassification, combination or exchange of shares of
capital stock of Parent on, or affecting the Shares or (ii) the Stockholder
shall become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Parent Common
Stock or other securities entitling the holder thereof to vote or give
consent with respect to the matters set forth in Section 1 hereof, then the
terms of this Agreement shall apply to the shares of capital stock or other
securities of Parent held by the Stockholder immediately following the
effectiveness of the events described in clause (i) or the Stockholder
becoming the beneficial owner thereof, as described in clause (ii), as
though they were Shares hereunder. Each of the Stockholders hereby agrees,
while this Agreement is in effect, to promptly notify the Company of the
number of any new shares of Company Common Stock acquired by the
Stockholder, if any, after the date hereof.
5. Specific Enforcement. The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage
would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with the terms hereof or were otherwise breached and
that each party shall be entitled to seek specific performance of the terms
hereof, in addition to any other remedy which may be available at law or in
equity.
6. Termination. Except for Sections 6 and 7 hereof, which shall survive for
the period specified therein, this Agreement shall terminate, with respect to a
Stockholder to whom any of the following applies, as applicable, but shall not
terminate with respect to the other Stockholders on the earlier of (i) the
termination of the Merger Agreement, (ii) the agreement of the parties hereto to
terminate this Agreement, (iii) consummation of the Merger and (iv) the date
such Stockholder ceases to own any Shares other than as a result of the breach
by such Stockholder of this Agreement.
7. Indemnification. The Company shall, to the fullest extent permitted
under applicable law, indemnify and hold harmless, each of the Stockholders
against any costs or expenses (including attorneys' fees as provided below),
judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages, liabilities and amounts paid in
settlement in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation by Parent or any stockholder of Parent asserting any breach by the
Stockholder of any fiduciary duty on his part to Parent or the other
stockholders of Parent by reason of the Stockholder entering into this
Agreement, for a period of six years after the date hereof. In the event the
Stockholder seeks indemnification from the Company for any such claim, action,
suit, proceeding or investigation (whether arising before or after the
termination of this Agreement), (a) the Company shall pay the fees and expenses
of one counsel selected by the Stockholder and reasonably acceptable to the
Company to represent the Stockholder in connection therewith promptly after
statements therefor are received, and (b) the Company will cooperate in the
defense of any such matter; provided,
B-3
<PAGE> 185
however, that the Company shall not be liable for any settlement effected
without its written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld);
provided, further, that in the event that any claim or claims for
indemnification are asserted or made within such six-year period, all rights to
indemnification in respect of any such claim or claims shall continue until the
disposition of any and all such claims.
8. Notices. All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed given upon (a) transmitter's confirmation of a
receipt of a facsimile transmission, (b) confirmed delivery by a standard
overnight carrier or when delivered by hand or (c) the expiration of five
business days after the day when mailed by certified or registered mail, postage
prepaid, addressed at the following addresses (or at such other address for a
party as shall be specified by like notice):
If to the Company, to:
Jacor Communications, Inc.
50 E. RiverCenter Blvd.
Suite 1200
Covington, KY 41011
Attention: Randy Michaels
Facsimile No.: (606) 655-9354
with a copy to:
Graydon Head & Ritchey
511 Walnut Street
1900 Fifth Third Center
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Attention: Richard S. Schwalzl
Facsimile No.: (513) 651-3836
and to:
Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton
One Liberty Plaza
New York, New York 10006
Attention: William A. Groll
Facsimile No.: (212) 225-3999
If to Stockholder, to:
The Stockholder
200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attention: the Stockholder
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
with a copy to:
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld L.L.P.
1700 Pacific Avenue
Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attention: Ford Lacy, P.C.
Facsimile No.: (214) 969-4343
9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the documents and
instruments referred to herein) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes
all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the
parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof.
B-4
<PAGE> 186
10. Consideration. This Agreement is granted in consideration of the
execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement by the Company.
11. Amendment. This Agreement may not be modified, amended, altered or
supplemented except upon the execution and delivery of a written agreement
executed by the parties hereto.
12. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall not be assigned by
operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of the other
parties hereto. This Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and
be enforceable by each party and such party's respective heirs, beneficiaries,
executors, representatives and permitted assigns.
13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
14. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects,
including validity, interpretation and effect, by the laws of the State of
Delaware (without giving effect to the provisions thereof relating to conflicts
of law).
15. Severability. Any term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid
or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be
ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability without
rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this
Agreement or affecting the validity or enforceability of any of the terms or
provisions of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this
Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision shall be interpreted
to be only so broad as is enforceable.
16. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference
purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
17. Shareholder Capacity. No Stockholder or designee of any Stockholder who
is or becomes during the term hereof a director or officer of Parent makes any
agreement or understanding herein in its capacity as such director or officer.
Each Stockholder signs solely in its capacity as the record holder and
beneficial owner of such Stockholder's Shares and nothing herein shall limit or
affect any actions taken by a Stockholder any designee of any Stockholder in his
or her capacity as an officer or director of Parent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
the Stockholder and a duly authorized officer of the Company on the day and year
first written above.
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ R. CHRISTOPHER WEBER
----------------------------------
Name: R. Christopher Weber
Title: Chief Financial Officer
B-5
<PAGE> 187
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
the Stockholder and a duly authorized officer of the Company on the day and year
first written above.
/s/ L. LOWRY MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
L. LOWRY MAYS
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ RANDALL T. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
RANDALL T. MAYS
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ MARK P. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
MARK P. MAYS
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ MARK P. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
MARK P. MAYS
As Trustee for Ryan Mays
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ MARK P. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
MARK P. MAYS
As Trustee for Patrick Mays
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ MARK P. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
MARK P. MAYS
As Trustee for Daniel Mays
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ MARK P. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
MARK P. MAYS
As Trustee for Andrew John Mays
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ RANDALL T. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
RANDALL T. MAYS
As Trustee for Grace Mays
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ RANDALL T. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
RANDALL T. MAYS
As Trustee for Lowry Thomas Mays
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ MARK P. MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
MARK P. MAYS
As Trustee for the Charlotte Moreau Family
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
B-6
<PAGE> 188
/s/ L. LOWRY MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
L. LOWRY MAYS
As Trustee for the Maddox Family Trust
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
/s/ L. LOWRY MAYS
- ------------------------------------------------------
L. LOWRY MAYS
As Trustee for the Ralph Maddox Family Trust
Address: 200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Facsimile No.: (210) 829-8080
B-7
<PAGE> 189
SCHEDULE I TO
VOTING AGREEMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF STOCKHOLDER NUMBER OF SHARES
- ------------------- ----------------
<S> <C>
L. Lowry Mays............................................... 29,084,078
Randall T. Mays............................................. 559,176
Mark Mays................................................... 795,296
Mark P. Mays................................................ 35,188
As Trustee for Ryan Mays
Mark P. Mays................................................ 35,196
As Trustee for Patrick Mays
Mark P. Mays................................................ 11,636
As Trustee for Daniel Mays
Mark P. Mays................................................ 1,260
As Trustee for Andrew John Mays
Randall T. Mays............................................. 6,444
As Trustee for Grace Mays
Randall T. Mays............................................. 3,108
As Trustee for Lowry Thomas Mays
Mark P. Mays................................................ 2,696
As Trustee for the Charlotte Moreau Family Trust
L. Lowry Mays............................................... 55,056
As Trustee for the Maddox Family Trust
L. Lowry Mays............................................... 45,000
As Trustee for the Ralph Maddox Family Trust
</TABLE>
B-8
<PAGE> 190
SCHEDULE II TO
VOTING AGREEMENT
Mark P. Mays holds 35,188 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for Ryan
Mays.
Mark P. Mays holds 35,196 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for
Patrick Mays.
Mark P. Mays holds 11,636 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for
Daniel Mays.
Mark P. Mays holds 1,260 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for Andrew
John Mays.
Randall T. Mays holds 6,444 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for
Grace Mays.
Randall T. Mays holds 3,108 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for
Lowry Thomas Mays.
Mark P. Mays holds 2,696 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for the
Charlotte Moreau Family Trust.
L. Lowry Mays holds 55,056 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for the
Maddox Family Trust.
L. Lowry Mays holds 45,000 Shares of Parent Common Stock as trustee for the
Ralph Maddox Family Trust.
B-9
<PAGE> 191
ANNEX C
VOTING AGREEMENT
This VOTING AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of October 8, 1998, is
entered into by and among Clear Channel Communications, Inc., a Texas
corporation ("Parent"), and the other party listed on the signature page hereof
(the "Stockholder").
WHEREAS, Parent, CCU Merger Sub, Inc. ("Merger Sub") and Jacor
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), have entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger of even date herewith (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which the
parties thereto have agreed, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth therein, to merge Merger Sub with and into the Company (the "Merger");
WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, the Stockholder is the owner of the number
of shares (the "Shares") of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the
Company (the "Company Common Stock") set forth opposite such Stockholder's name
on Schedule I attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, as a condition to its willingness to enter into the Merger
Agreement, Parent has required that the Stockholder agree, and the Stockholder
is willing to agree, to the matters set forth herein. Except as specified
herein, terms defined in the Merger Agreement are used herein as defined
therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the agreements set
forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Voting of Shares.
1.1. Voting Agreement. The Stockholder hereby agrees to vote (or cause to
be voted) all of the Shares (and any and all securities issued or issuable in
respect thereof) which such Stockholder is entitled to vote (or to provide his
written consent thereto), at any annual, special or other meeting of the
stockholders of the Company, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, or
pursuant to any consent in lieu of a meeting or otherwise:
(i) in favor of the Merger and the approval and adoption of the terms
contemplated by the Merger Agreement and any actions required in
furtherance thereof;
(ii) against any action or agreement that is reasonably likely to
result in a breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation
or warranty or any other obligation of the Company under this Agreement or
the Merger Agreement; and
(iii) except for all such actions which may be permitted to the
Company under Section 5.1 of the Merger Agreement, against (A) any
extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, rights offering,
reorganization, recapitalization or liquidation involving the Company or
any of its subsidiaries other than the Merger, (B) a sale or transfer of a
material amount of assets of the Company or any of its material
subsidiaries or the issuance of any securities of the Company or any
subsidiary, (C) any change in the Board of Directors of the Company other
than in connection with an annual meeting of the shareholders of the
Company with respect to the slate of directors proposed by the incumbent
Board of Directors of the Company (in which case they agree to vote for the
slate proposed by the incumbent Board) or (D) any action that is reasonably
likely to materially impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or adversely
affect in any material respect the Merger and the transaction contemplated
by the Merger Agreement.
2. Representations and Warranties of Stockholder. The Stockholder
represents and warrants to Parent as follows in each case as of the date hereof:
2.1. Binding Agreement. The Stockholder has the capacity to execute and
deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
The Stockholder has duly and validly executed and delivered this Agreement and
this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the
Stockholder, enforceable against the Stockholder in accordance with its terms,
except as such enforceability
C-1
<PAGE> 192
may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other
similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally and by general equitable
principles (regardless of whether enforceability is considered in a proceeding
in equity or at law).
2.2. No Conflict. Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, nor
the compliance with any of the provisions hereof in each case by the Stockholder
(a) require any consent, approval, authorization or permit of, registration,
declaration or filing (except for filings under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) with, or notification to, any
governmental entity, (b) result in a default (or an event which, with notice or
lapse of time or both, would become a default) or give rise to any right of
termination by any third party, cancellation, amendment or acceleration under
any material contract, agreement, instrument, commitment, arrangement or
understanding, or result in the creation of a security interest, lien, charge,
encumbrance, equity or claim with respect to any of the Shares, (c) require any
material consent, authorization or approval of any person other than a
governmental entity which has not been obtained, or (d) violate or conflict with
any order, writ, injunction, decree or law applicable to the Stockholder or the
Shares.
2.3. Ownership of Shares. Except as set forth in Schedule II and except as
may be provided in the organizational documents, if any, of the Stockholder, the
Stockholder is the record and beneficial owner of the Shares free and clear of
any security interests, liens, charges, encumbrances, options or restriction on
the right to vote the Shares. The Stockholder holds exclusive power to vote the
Shares, subject to the limitations set forth in Section 1 of this Agreement. The
Shares represent all of the shares of capital stock of the Company beneficially
owned by Stockholder.
3. Representations and Warranties of Parent. Parent represents and warrants
to the Stockholder as follows in each case as of the date hereof:
3.1. Binding Agreement. Parent is a corporation duly incorporated, validly
existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas and has full
corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement and the Merger Agreement by Parent and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby have been duly and validly
authorized by the Board of Directors of Parent, and except for the approval of
the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock in the Merger by holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock actually present and
voting at the Parent Special Meeting, no other corporate proceedings on the part
of Parent are necessary to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of
this Agreement and the Merger Agreement by Parent and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated thereby. Parent has duly and validly executed this
Agreement and this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation
of Parent, enforceable against Parent in accordance with its terms, except as
such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization or other similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally and
by general equitable principles (regardless of whether enforceability is
considered in a proceeding in equity or at law).
3.2. No Conflict. Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the
consummation by Parent of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the
compliance by Parent with any of the provisions hereof will (a) conflict with or
result in a breach of any provision of its Articles of Incorporation or By-laws,
(b) require any consent, approval, authorization or permit of, registration,
declaration or filing (except for filings under the Exchange Act) with, or
notification to, any governmental entity, (c) result in a default (or an event
which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become a default) or give
rise to any right of termination by any third party, cancellation, amendment or
acceleration under any contract, agreement, instrument, commitment, arrangement
or understanding, (d) require any material consent, authorization or approval of
any person other than a governmental entity, or (e) violate or conflict with any
order, writ, injunction, decree or law applicable to Parent.
C-2
<PAGE> 193
4. Transfer and Other Restrictions. For so long as the Merger Agreement is
in effect:
4.1. Certain Prohibited Transfers. The Stockholder agrees not to:
(a) sell, transfer, assign (except as part of a bona fide pledge) or
otherwise dispose of, or enter into any contract, option or other
arrangement or understanding with respect to the sale, transfer, assignment
or other disposition of, the Shares or any interest contained therein
(except as part of a bona fide pledge), during the period commencing 57
trading days prior to the Estimated Closing Date(a) sell, transfer, assign
(except as part of a bona fide pledge) or otherwise dispose of, or enter
into any contract, option or other arrangement or understanding with
respect to the sale, transfer, assignment or other disposition of, the
Shares or any interest contained therein (except as part of a bona fide
pledge), during the period commencing 57 trading days prior to the
Estimated Closing Date and ending on the second trading day prior to the
Estimated Closing Date (the "Restriction Period"). For purpose of this
Agreement, the term "Estimated Closing Date" shall mean, a date specified
in a notice delivered by Parent to the Stockholder, which date is to be
determined in good faith by the General Counsel of the Parent following
consultation with the General Counsel of the Company to be the date on
which the Merger will be consummated, and which Estimated Closing Date
shall be the later of (i) the sum of 90 calendar days plus 57 trading days
from the date hereof, and (ii) the sum of 20 calendar days plus 57 trading
days following the delivery of such notice.
(b) except as contemplated by this Agreement, grant any proxies or
power of attorney or enter into a voting agreement or other arrangement
with respect to the Shares, other than this Agreement; (b) except as
contemplated by this Agreement, grant any proxies or power of attorney or
enter into a voting agreement or other arrangement with respect to the
Shares, other than this Agreement;
(c) deposit the Shares into a voting trust; nor
(d) during the Restriction Period, buy, sell or trade any equity
security of Parent including, without limitation, entering into any put,
call, option, swap, collar or any other derivative transaction which has a
similar economic effect.
Any date selected by the General Counsel of Parent pursuant to Section
4.1(a) as the Estimated Closing Date may be delayed to a later date by the
General Counsel in like manner by notice delivered by the Parent to the
Stockholder at least 20 days prior to the end of the Restriction Period, but any
trading restriction resulting from such extension shall be suspended for a
period of ten trading days before becoming effective.
4.2. Additional Shares. Without limiting the provisions of the Merger
Agreement, in the event (i) of any stock dividend, stock split,
recapitalization, reclassification, combination or exchange of shares of capital
stock of the Company on, of or affecting the Shares or (ii) the Stockholder
shall become the beneficial owner of any additional shares of Company Common
Stock or other securities entitling the holder thereof to vote or give consent
with respect to the matters set forth in Section 1 hereof, then the terms of
this Agreement shall apply to the shares of capital stock or other securities of
the Company held by the Stockholder immediately following the effectiveness of
the events described in clause (i) or the Stockholder becoming the beneficial
owner thereof, as described in clause (ii), as though they were Shares
hereunder. The Stockholder hereby agrees, while this Agreement is in effect, to
promptly notify Parent of the number of any new shares of Company Common Stock
acquired by the Stockholder, if any, after the date hereof.
5. Specific Enforcement. The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage
would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with the terms hereof or were otherwise breached and
that each party shall be entitled to seek specific performance of the terms
hereof, in addition to any other remedy which may be available at law or in
equity.
6. Termination. Except for Sections 6 and 7 hereof, which shall survive for
the period specified therein, this Agreement shall terminate on the earlier of
(i) the termination of the Merger Agreement, (ii) the agreement of the parties
hereto to terminate this Agreement, (iii) consummation of the Merger and (iv)
the date the Stockholder ceases to own any Shares.
C-3
<PAGE> 194
7. Indemnification. Parent shall, to the fullest extent permitted under
applicable law, indemnify and hold harmless, the Stockholder against any costs
or expenses (including attorneys' fees as provided below), judgments, fines,
losses, claims, damages, liabilities and amounts paid in settlement in
connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation by the
Company or any stockholder of the Company asserting any breach by the
Stockholder of any fiduciary duty on his part to the Company or the other
stockholders of the Company by reason of the Stockholder entering into this
Agreement, for a period of six years after the date hereof. In the event the
Stockholder seeks indemnification from Parent for any such claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation (whether arising before or after the termination of
this Agreement), (a) Parent shall pay the fees and expenses of one counsel
selected by the Stockholder and reasonably acceptable to Parent to represent
Stockholder in connection therewith promptly after statements therefor are
received, and (b) Parent and Merger Sub will cooperate in the defense of any
such matter; provided, however, that Parent shall not be liable for any
settlement effected without its written consent (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld); provided, further, that in the event that any claim or
claims for indemnification are asserted or made within such six-year period, all
rights to indemnification in respect of any such claim or claims shall continue
until the disposition of any and all such claims.
8. Notices. All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed given upon (a) transmitter's confirmation of a
receipt of a facsimile transmission, (b) confirmed delivery by a standard
overnight carrier or when delivered by hand or (c) the expiration of five
business days after the day when mailed by certified or registered mail, postage
prepaid, addressed at the following addresses (or at such other address for a
party as shall be specified by like notice):
If to Parent, to:
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attention: Randall Mays
Facsimile No.: (210) 822-2299
with a copy to:
Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld L.L.P.
1700 Pacific Avenue
Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attention: Ford Lacy, P.C.
Facsimile No.: (214) 969-4343
If to Stockholder, to the Stockholder at:
2 North Riverside Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Facsimile No.: (312) 559-1279
with a copy to:
Rosenberg & Liebentritt
Two North Riverside Plaza
Suite 1600
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Attention: Alisa M. Singer
Facsimile No.: (312) 454-0335
9. Certain Events. The Stockholder agrees not to sell or transfer more than
2,600,000 Shares to any transferee that is not reasonably believed by the
Stockholder to be a financial investor engaged in the business of investing in
marketable securities, a bank, an insurance company, a pension fund or a person
described in
C-4
<PAGE> 195
Rule 13d-1(b)(ii) of the Exchange Act (collectively the Institutional
Investors) (it being understood that a leveraged buyout fund with significant
investments in the broadcast industry shall not be deemed to be an Institutional
Investor) unless the Stockholder obtains the agreement of such transferee to
execute an agreement containing the operative provisions of this Agreement,
excluding Sections 2, 4.1(a), 4.1(d), 4.2 and 9.
10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement (including the documents and
instruments referred to herein) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes
all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the
parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject matter hereof.
11. Consideration. This Agreement is granted in consideration of the
execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement by Parent.
12. Amendment. This Agreement may not be modified, amended, altered or
supplemented except upon the execution and delivery of a written agreement
executed by the parties hereto.
13. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall not be assigned by
operation of law or otherwise without the prior written consent of the other
parties hereto. This Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and
be enforceable by each party and such party's respective heirs, beneficiaries,
executors, representatives and permitted assigns; provided, that this Agreement
shall not be binding upon any transferee of the Shares, including without
limitation any Institutional Investors.
14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
15. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects,
including validity, interpretation and effect, by the laws of the State of
Delaware (without giving effect to the provisions thereof relating to conflicts
of law).
16. Severability. Any term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid
or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be
ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability without
rendering invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this
Agreement or affecting the validity or enforceability of any of the terms or
provisions of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this
Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision shall be interpreted
to be only so broad as is enforceable.
17. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference
purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
18. Shareholder Capacity. No Stockholder or designee of any Stockholder who
is or becomes during the term hereof a director or officer of the Company makes
any agreement or understanding herein in its capacity as such director or
officer. Each Stockholder signs solely in its capacity as the record holder and
beneficial owner of such Stockholder's Shares and nothing herein shall limit or
affect any actions taken by a Stockholder any designee of any Stockholder in his
or her capacity as an officer or director of the Company.
C-5
<PAGE> 196
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement haw been duly executed and delivered by
the Stockholder and a duly authorized officer of Parent on the day and year
first written above.
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By:
---------------------------------------------
Name: Randall Mays
Title: Chief Financial Officer
[EACH OF ZELL/CHILMARK FUND L.P., SAMSTOCK,
SZ2 (IGP) PARTNERSHIP and SAMUEL ZELL]
C-6
<PAGE> 197
ANNEX D
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
This REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT dated as of October 8, 1998 (this
"Agreement"), among Clear Channel Communications, Inc., a Texas corporation (the
"Issuer"), and the Holders (as defined herein).
WHEREAS, this Agreement is being entered into in connection with the
closing under the Merger Agreement referred to below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises,
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS
SECTION 1.1 Definitions. Terms defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of October 8, 1998 (the "Merger Agreement"), among the Issuer, CCU
Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation wholly owned by the Issuer, and Jacor
Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), are used herein as
defined therein. In addition, the following terms, as used herein, shall have
the following respective meanings:
"Commission" means the Securities and Exchange Commission or any
successor governmental body or agency.
"Common Stock" means the common stock, par value $.10 per share, of
the Issuer.
"Demand Registration" has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section
2.2(a).
"Demand Request" has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section 2.2(a).
"Disadvantageous Condition" has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 2.4.
"Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
"Holder" means a Person who owns Registrable Securities and is either
(i) an Investor or (ii) a Person that (A) has agreed to be bound by the
terms of this Agreement as if such Person were an Investor and (B) is (x) a
general or limited partner or limited liability company member, as
appropriate, of an Investor that has received Registrable Securities
pursuant to the distribution to such Person of Registrable Securities in
accordance with the agreement of limited or general partnership or limited
liability company agreement, as appropriate, governing the rights of such
Persons, (y) an individual that has a direct or indirect equity interest in
a general partner, a limited partner or a limited liability company member
of an Investor and has received Registrable Securities directly or
indirectly from such Investor or (z) any financial institution that has
received Registrable Securities pursuant to a bona fide pledge thereof by
any Holder referred to in the preceding clauses (x) or (y).
"Investor" means any of the following: (i) Zell/Chilmark Fund, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership, (ii) Samstock, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company, (iii) SZ2 (IGP) Partnership, Illinois general
partnership, and (iv) Samuel Zell.
"Permitted Holder" means each of the Zell Holders' Agent (or one
representative of the Zell Holders that (x) is designated by Zell Holders
that hold a majority of the Registrable Securities proposed to be sold by
Zell Holders in the applicable offering and (y) is reasonably acceptable to
the Issuer).
"Registrable Securities" means Common Stock acquired by the Holders
pursuant to the Merger (and any shares of stock or other securities into
which or for which such Common Stock may hereafter
D-1
<PAGE> 198
be changed, converted or exchanged and any other shares or securities
issued to Holders of such Common Stock (or such shares of stock or other
securities into which or for which such shares are so changed, converted or
exchanged) upon any reclassification, share combination, share subdivision,
share dividend, share exchange, merger, consolidation or similar
transaction or event) or otherwise. As to any particular Registrable
Securities, such Registrable Securities shall cease to be Registrable
Securities as soon as (i) such Registrable Securities have been sold or
otherwise disposed of pursuant to a registration statement that was filed
with the Commission in accordance with this Agreement and declared
effective under the Securities Act, (ii) such Registrable Securities shall
have been otherwise sold, transferred or disposed of by a Holder to any
Person that is not a Holder, or (iii) such Registrable Securities shall
have ceased to be outstanding.
"Registration Expenses" means any and all expenses incident to
performance of or compliance with any registration of securities pursuant
to Article 2, including, without limitation, (i) the fees, disbursements
and expenses of the Issuer's counsel and accountants (including in
connection with the delivery of opinions and/or comfort letters) in
connection with this Agreement and the performance of the Issuer's
obligations hereunder; (ii) all expenses, including filing fees, in
connection with the preparation, printing and filing of one or more
registration statements hereunder; (iii) the cost of printing or producing
any agreements among underwriters, underwriting agreements, and blue sky or
legal investment memoranda; (iv) the filing fees incident to securing any
required review by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. of
the terms of the sale of the securities to be disposed of; (v) transfer
agents' and registrars' fees and expenses in connection with such offering;
(vi) all security engraving and security printing expenses; (vii) all fees
and expenses payable in connection with the listing of the Registrable
Securities on any securities exchange or automated interdealer quotation
system on which the Common Stock is then listed; and (viii) all reasonable
fees and expenses of one legal counsel for the Holders in connection with
each of the Required Shelf Registration and the Demand Registration, which
legal counsel shall be selected by Holders owning a majority of the
Registrable Securities then being registered; provided that Registration
Expenses shall exclude (x) all underwriting discounts and commissions,
selling or placement agent or broker fees and commissions, and transfer
taxes, if any, in connection with the sale of any securities, (y) the fees
and expenses of counsel for any Holder (other than pursuant to clause
(viii)) and (z) all costs and expenses of the Issuer incurred as
contemplated in Section 2.6(g).
"Required Shelf Registration" has the meaning ascribed thereto in
Section 2.1.
"Rule 144" means Rule 144 (or any successor rule to similar effect)
promulgated under the Securities Act.
"Rule 145" means Rule 145 (or any successor rule to similar effect)
promulgated under the Securities Act.
"Rule 415 Offering" means an offering on a delayed or continuous basis
pursuant to Rule 415 (or any successor rule to similar effect) promulgated
under the Securities Act.
"Securities Act" means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
"Selling Holder" means any Holder who sells Registrable Securities
pursuant to a public offering registered hereunder.
"Shelf Registration" means the registration under the Securities Act
of a Rule 415 Offering.
"Shelf Registration Statement" means a registration statement intended
to effect a Shelf Registration.
"Zell Holders' Agent" has the meaning ascribed thereto in Section
3.11.
"Zell Holder" means an Investor, any Affiliate of an Investor that is
a Holder, and each Person referred to in clause (x) of the definition of
"Holder".
D-2
<PAGE> 199
SECTION 1.2. Internal References. Unless the context indicates otherwise,
references to Articles, Sections and paragraphs shall refer to the corresponding
articles, sections and paragraphs in this Agreement, and references to the
parties shall mean the parties to this Agreement.
ARTICLE 2
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
SECTION 2.1. Shelf Registration. If requested by a Holder or Holders
holding a majority in interest of the Registrable Securities, as soon as
practicable (but in any event not more than 15 days) after such request, the
Issuer shall prepare and file with the Commission a Shelf Registration Statement
on an appropriate form that shall include all Registrable Securities, and may
include securities of the Issuer for sale for the Issuer's own account (the
"Required Shelf Registration"). The Issuer shall use its reasonable best efforts
to cause such Shelf Registration Statement to be declared effective as soon as
practicable after such request. Notwithstanding anything else contained in this
Agreement, the Issuer shall only be obligated to keep such Shelf Registration
Statement effective until the earliest of:
(a) (y) 12 months after the date such Shelf Registration Statement has
been declared effective or (z) the date, which may not be earlier than 90
days following the date such Registration Statement has been declared
effective, on which the Issuer delivers to the Holders an opinion of
counsel, reasonably acceptable to the Issuer and the Zell Holders' Agent,
to the effect that in the opinion of such counsel, sales by a Holder (other
than a general partner of an Investor or Samuel Zell) would not be
aggregated with sales by other Holders for purposes of the volume
limitations of Rule 144 or 145, provided that such 12-month period or
90-day period, respectively, shall be extended by (i) the length of any
period during which the Issuer delays in maintaining the Shelf Registration
Statement current pursuant to Section 2.4, (ii) the length of any period
(in which such Shelf Registration Statement is required to be effective
hereunder) during which such Shelf Registration Statement is not maintained
effective, and (iii) such number of days that equals the number of days
elapsing from (x) the date the written notice contemplated by Section
2.6(e) below is given by the Issuer to (y) the date on which the Issuer
delivers to the Holders of Registrable Securities the supplement or
amendment contemplated by Section 2.6(e) below;
(b) such time as all Registrable Securities have been sold or disposed
of thereunder or sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of to a Person
that is not a Holder; and
(c) such time as all securities that were Registrable Securities on
the date hereof have ceased to be Registrable Securities (the earliest of
(a), (b) and (c) being the "Shelf Termination Date").
The Required Shelf Registration shall not be counted as a Demand
Registration for purposes of Section 2.2 of this Agreement.
SECTION 2.2. Demand Registration.
(a) Upon written notice to the Issuer from a Holder or Holders holding a
majority in interest of the Registrable Securities (but no later than the date
that is 12 months after the Effective Time) (the "Demand Request") requesting
that the Issuer effect the registration under the Securities Act of any or all
of the Registrable Securities held by such requesting Holders, which notice
shall specify the intended method or methods of disposition of such Registrable
Securities, the Issuer shall prepare as soon as practicable and, within 15 days
after such request, file with the Commission a registration statement with
respect to such Registrable Securities and thereafter use its reasonable best
efforts to cause such registration statement to be declared effective under the
Securities Act for purposes of dispositions in accordance with the intended
D-3
<PAGE> 200
method or methods of disposition stated in such request within 30 days after the
filing of such registration statement. Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Agreement to the contrary:
(i) the Holders may collectively exercise their rights to request
registration under this Section 2.2(a) on not more than one occasion (such
registration being referred to herein as the "Demand Registration");
(ii) the method of disposition requested by Holders in connection with
any Demand Registration may not, without the Issuer's written consent, be a
Rule 415 Offering; and
(iii) the Issuer shall not be required to effect the Demand
Registration hereunder if all securities that were Registrable Securities
on the date hereof have ceased to be Registrable Securities.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary,
a Demand Registration requested by Holders pursuant to this Section 2.2 shall
not be deemed to have been effected, and, therefore, not requested and the
rights of each Holder shall be deemed not to have been exercised for purposes of
paragraph (a) above, (i) if such Demand Registration has not become effective
under the Securities Act or (ii) if such Demand Registration, after it became
effective under the Securities Act, was not maintained effective under the
Securities Act (other than as a result of any stop order, injunction or other
order or requirement of the Commission or other government agency or court
solely on the account of a material misrepresentation or omission of a Holder)
for at least 30 days (or such shorter period ending when all the Registrable
Securities covered thereby have been disposed of pursuant thereto) and, as a
result thereof, the Registrable Securities requested to be registered cannot be
distributed in accordance with the plan of distribution set forth in the related
registration statement. So long as a Demand Request is made by the Holders
within the 12-month period referred to in Section 2.2(a), the Holders shall not
lose their right to their Demand Registration under Section 2.2 if the Demand
Registration related to such Demand Request is delayed or not effected in the
circumstances set forth in this clause (b).
(c) The Issuer shall have the right to cause the registration of additional
equity securities for sale for the account of the Issuer, but not for the
account of any other person, in the registration of Registrable Securities
requested by the Holders pursuant to Section 2.2(a) above, provided that if such
Holders are advised in writing (with a copy to the Issuer) by the lead or
managing underwriter referred to in Section 2.3(b) that, in such underwriter's
good faith view, all or a part of such Registrable Securities and additional
equity securities cannot be sold and the inclusion of such Registrable
Securities and additional equity securities in such registration would be likely
to have an adverse effect on the price, timing or distribution of the offering
and sale of the Registrable Securities and additional equity securities then
contemplated, then the number of securities that can, in the good faith view of
such underwriter, be sold in such offering without so adversely affecting such
offering shall be allocated pro rata among the requesting Holders and the Issuer
on the basis of the relative number requested to be included therein by the
Issuer and each such Holder; provided that in the event such a pro rata
allocation shall be made in connection with the Demand Request, the remaining
Holders shall be entitled to request one additional Demand Registration (without
needing to make a Demand Request therefor within the 12-month period referred to
in Section 2.2(a)); provided further that in connection with such additional
Demand Registration, if any, the Issuer may not include additional securities
therein for its own account if such inclusion would result in any reduction in
the Registrable Securities proposed to be sold therein by the Holders. The
Holders of the Registrable Securities to be offered pursuant to paragraph (a)
above may require that any such additional equity securities be included by the
Issuer in the offering proposed by such Holders on the same conditions as the
Registrable Securities that are included therein.
(d) Within 7 days after delivery of a Demand Request by a Holder, the
Issuer shall provide a written notice to each Holder (provided that, if so
requested by the Issuer after appropriate notice to the Zell Holders' Agent by
the Issuer, the Zell Holders' Agent shall provide written notice to each Zell
Holder), advising such Holder of its right to include any or all of the
Registrable Securities held by such Holder for sale pursuant to the Demand
Registration and advising such Holder of procedures to enable such Holder to
elect to so include Registrable Securities for sale in the Demand Registration.
Any Holder may, within 7 days of delivery to such Holder of a notice pursuant to
this Section 2.2(d), elect to so include Registrable Securities in the Demand
D-4
<PAGE> 201
Registration by written notice to such effect to the Issuer specifying the
number of Registrable Securities desired to be so included by such Holder.
SECTION 2.3. Other Matters In Connection With Registrations.
(a) Each Zell Holder shall keep the Zell Holders' Agent informed promptly
(x) of the name, address and other contact information of such Zell Holder, (y)
of the number of Registrable Securities held from time-to-time by such Zell
Holder, and (z) of each sale, transfer or other disposition of Registrable
Securities (including the number of shares sold) by each such Zell Holder. The
Zell Holders' Agent shall use its reasonable best efforts to keep the Issuer
informed promptly (x) of the name, address and other contact information of each
Zell Holder, (y) of the number of Registrable Securities held from time-to-time
by each such Zell Holder and (z) of each sale, transfer or other disposition of
Registrable Securities (including the number of shares sold) by each such Zell
Holder.
(b) In the event that any public offering pursuant to this Agreement shall
involve, in whole or in part, an underwritten offering, the Issuer shall have
the right to designate an underwriter or underwriters as the lead or managing
underwriters of such underwritten offering who shall be reasonably acceptable to
Holders owning a majority of the Registrable Securities proposed to be sold
therein.
SECTION 2.4. Certain Delay Rights. Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Agreement to the contrary, if at any time while the Required Shelf
Registration is effective the Issuer provides written notice to each Holder
(whether by notice directly to such Holder or, in the case of the Zell Holders,
through the Zell Holders' Agent) that in the Issuer's good faith and reasonable
judgment it would be materially disadvantageous to the Issuer (because the sale
of Registrable Securities covered by such registration statement or the
disclosure of information therein or in any related prospectus or prospectus
supplement would materially interfere with any acquisition, financing or other
material event or transaction in connection with which a registration of
securities under the Securities Act for the account of the Issuer is then
intended or the public disclosure of which at the time would be materially
prejudicial to the Issuer (a "Disadvantageous Condition") for sales of
Registrable Securities thereunder to then be permitted, and setting forth the
general reasons for such judgment, the Issuer may refrain from maintaining
current the prospectus contained in the Shelf Registration Statement until such
Disadvantageous Condition no longer exists (notice of which the Issuer shall
promptly deliver to each Holder (directly or, in the case of the Zell Holders,
through the Zell Holders' Agent)). Furthermore, notwithstanding anything else
contained in this Agreement, with respect to any registration statement filed,
or to be filed, pursuant to Section 2.2, if the Issuer provides written notice
to each Holder (whether by notice directly to such Holder or, in the case of the
Zell Holders, through the Zell Holders' Agent) that in the Issuer's good faith
and reasonable judgment it would be materially disadvantageous to the Issuer
(because of a Disadvantageous Condition) for such a registration statement to be
maintained effective, or to be filed and become effective, and setting forth the
general reasons for such judgment, the Issuer shall be entitled to cause such
registration statement to be withdrawn or the effectiveness of such registration
statement terminated, or, in the event no registration statement has yet been
filed, shall be entitled not to file any such registration statement, until such
Disadvantageous Condition no longer exists (notice of which the Issuer shall
promptly deliver to each Holder (directly or, in the case of the Zell Holders,
through the Zell Holders' Agent)). With respect to each Holder, upon the receipt
by such Holder of any such notice of a Disadvantageous Condition (directly from
the Issuer or, in the case of the Zell Holders, through the Zell Holders' Agent)
(i) in connection with the Required Shelf Registration, such Holder shall
forthwith discontinue use of the prospectus and any prospectus supplement under
such registration statement and shall suspend sales of Registrable Securities
until such Disadvantageous Condition no longer exists and (ii) in connection
with the Required Shelf Registration or the Demand Registration, as applicable,
if so directed by the Issuer by notice as aforesaid, such Holder will deliver to
the Issuer all copies, other than permanent filed copies then in such Holder's
possession, of the prospectus and prospectus supplements then covering such
Registrable Securities at the time of receipt of such notice as aforesaid.
Notwithstanding anything else contained in this Agreement, (x) neither the
filing nor the effectiveness of any registration statement under Section 2.2 may
be delayed for more than a total of 60 days pursuant to this Section 2.4 and (y)
the maintaining current of a prospectus (and the suspension of sales of
Registrable Securities) in connection with
D-5
<PAGE> 202
the Required Shelf Registration may not be delayed under this Section 2.4 for
more than a total of 60 days in any six-month period.
SECTION 2.5. Expenses. Except as provided herein, the Issuer shall pay all
Registration Expenses with respect to each registration hereunder.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) each Holder and the Issuer shall be
responsible for its own internal administrative and similar costs, which shall
not constitute Registration Expenses, (ii) each Holder shall be responsible for
the legal fees and expenses of its own counsel (except as provided in clause
(viii) of the definition of Registration Expenses), (iii) each Holder shall be
responsible for all underwriting discounts and commissions, selling or placement
agent or broker fees and commissions, and transfer taxes, if any, in connection
with the sale of securities by such Holder, and (iv) the Holders shall be
jointly and severally responsible for all out-of-pocket costs and expenses of
the Issuer and its officers and employees incurred in connection with providing
the assistance and/or attending analyst or investor presentations or any "road
show" undertaken in connection with the registration and/or marketing of any
Registrable Securities as contemplated in Section 2.6(g).
SECTION 2.6. Registration and Qualification. If and whenever the Issuer is
required to effect the registration of any Registrable Securities under the
Securities Act as provided in Sections 2.1 or 2.2, the Issuer shall as promptly
as practicable (but subject to the provisions of Sections 2.1 and 2.2):
(a) prepare, file and cause to become effective a registration
statement under the Securities Act relating to the Registrable Securities
to be offered in accordance with the intended method of disposition
thereof;
(b) prepare and file with the Commission such amendments and
supplements to such registration statement and the prospectus used in
connection therewith as may be necessary to keep such registration
statement effective and to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act
with respect to the disposition of all Registrable Securities (i) in the
case of the Required Shelf Registration, until the Shelf Termination Date
and (ii) in the case of the Demand Registration, until the earlier of (A)
such time as all Registrable Securities proposed to be sold therein have
been disposed of in accordance with the intended methods of disposition set
forth in such registration statement and (B) the expiration of 30 days
after such registration statement becomes effective, provided, that such
30-day period shall be extended for such number of days that equals the
number of days elapsing from (x) the date the written notice contemplated
by paragraph (e) below is given by the Issuer to (y) the date on which the
Issuer delivers to the Holders of Registrable Securities the supplement or
amendment contemplated by paragraph (e) below;
(c) furnish to the Holders of Registrable Securities and to any
underwriter of such Registrable Securities such number of conformed copies
of such registration statement and of each such amendment and supplement
thereto (in each case including all exhibits), such number of copies of the
prospectus included in such registration statement (including each
preliminary prospectus), in conformity with the requirements of the
Securities Act, and such documents incorporated by reference in such
registration statement or prospectus, as the Holders of Registrable
Securities or such underwriter may reasonably request;
(d) furnish to any underwriter of such Registrable Securities an
opinion of counsel for the Issuer and a "cold comfort" letter signed by the
independent public accountants who have audited the financial statements of
the Issuer included in the applicable registration statement, in each such
case covering substantially such matters with respect to such registration
statement (and the prospectus included therein) and the related offering as
are customarily covered in opinions of issuer's counsel with respect
thereto and in accountants' letters delivered to underwriters in
underwritten public offerings of securities and such other matters as such
underwriters may reasonably request;
(e) promptly notifying the Selling Holders in writing (i) at any time
when a prospectus relating to a registration pursuant to Section 2.1 or 2.2
is required to be delivered under the Securities Act of the happening of
any event as a result of which the prospectus included in such registration
statement, as then in effect, includes an untrue statement of a material
fact or omits to state any material fact required
D-6
<PAGE> 203
to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light
of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and (ii)
of any request by the Commission or any other regulatory body or other body
having jurisdiction for any amendment or supplement to any registration
statement or other document relating to such offering, and in either such
case, at the request of the Selling Holders prepare and furnish to the
Selling Holders a reasonable number of copies of a supplement to or an
amendment of such prospectus as may be necessary so that, as thereafter
delivered to the purchasers of such Registrable Securities, such prospectus
shall not include an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are
made, not misleading;
(f) use its reasonable best efforts to list all such Registrable
Securities covered by such registration on each securities exchange and
automated interdealer quotation system on which the Common Stock is then
listed;
(g) use reasonable efforts to assist the Holders in the marketing of
Common Stock in connection with up to two underwritten offerings hereunder
(including, to the extent reasonably consistent with work commitments,
using reasonable efforts to have officers of the Issuer attend "road shows"
and analyst or investor presentations scheduled in connection with such
registration), with all out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred by the
Issuer or such officers in connection with such attendance or assistance to
be paid by the Holders as provided in Section 2.5; and
(h) furnish for delivery in connection with the closing of any
offering of Registrable Securities pursuant to a registration effected
pursuant to Section 2.1 or 2.2 unlegended certificates representing
ownership of the Registrable Securities being sold in such denominations as
shall be requested by the Selling Holders or the underwriters.
SECTION 2.7. Underwriting; Due Diligence.
(a) If requested by the underwriters for any underwritten offering of
Registrable Securities pursuant to a registration requested under this Article
2, the Issuer shall enter into an underwriting agreement with such underwriters
for such offering, which agreement will contain such representations and
warranties by the Issuer and such other terms and provisions as are customarily
contained in underwriting agreements with respect to secondary distributions,
including, without limitation, indemnification and contribution provisions
substantially to the effect and to the extent provided in Section 2.8, and
agreements as to the provision of opinions of counsel and accountants' letters
to the effect and to the extent provided in Section 2.6(d). Such underwriting
agreement shall also contain such representations and warranties by such Selling
Holders and such other terms and provisions as are customarily contained in
underwriting agreements with respect to secondary distributions, including,
without limitation, indemnification and contribution provisions substantially to
the effect and to the extent provided in Section 2.8.
(b) In connection with the preparation and filing of each registration
statement registering Registrable Securities under the Securities Act pursuant
to this Article 2, the Issuer shall give the Permitted Holders of such
Registrable Securities and the underwriters, if any, and their respective
counsel and accountants (the identity and number of whom shall be reasonably
acceptable to the Issuer), such reasonable and customary access to its books,
records and properties and such opportunities to discuss the business and
affairs of the Issuer with its officers and the independent public accounts who
have certified the financial statements of the Issuer as shall be necessary, in
the opinion of such Holders and such underwriters or their respective counsel,
to conduct a reasonable investigation within the meaning of the Securities Act;
provided that the foregoing shall not require the Issuer to provide access to
(or copies of) any competitively sensitive information relating to the Issuer or
its subsidiaries or their respective business; provided further that (i) each
Holder and the underwriters and their respective counsel and accountants shall
have entered into a confidentiality agreement reasonably acceptable to the
Issuer and (ii) the Permitted Holders and the underwriters and their respective
counsel and accountants shall use their reasonable best efforts to minimize the
disruption to the Issuer's business and coordinate any such investigation of the
books, records and properties of the Issuer and any such
D-7
<PAGE> 204
discussions with the Issuer's officers and accountants so that all such
investigations occur at the same time and all such discussions occur at the same
time.
SECTION 2.8. Indemnification and Contribution.
(a) The Issuer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each Selling Holder
and each Person, if any, who controls such Selling Holder within the meaning of
either Section 15 of the Securities Act or Section 20 of the Exchange Act from
and against any and all losses, claims, damages and liabilities (including,
without limitation, any legal or other expenses reasonably incurred in
connection with defending or investigating any such action or claim) insofar as
such losses, claims, damages or liabilities are caused by any untrue statement
or alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained in any registration
statement or any amendment thereof, any preliminary prospectus or prospectus (as
amended or supplemented if the Issuer shall have furnished any amendments or
supplements thereto) relating to the Registrable Securities, or caused by any
omission or alleged omission to state therein a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading,
except insofar as such losses, claims, damages or liabilities are caused by any
such untrue statement or omission or alleged untrue statement or omission based
upon information furnished to the Issuer in writing by such Selling Holder
expressly for use therein. The Issuer also agrees to indemnify any underwriter
of the Registrable Securities so offered and each Person, if any, who controls
such underwriter on substantially the same basis as that of the indemnification
by the Issuer of the Selling Holders provided in this Section 2.8(a).
(b) Each Selling Holder agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Issuer,
its directors, the officers who sign the registration statement and each Person,
if any who controls the Issuer within the meaning of either Section 15 of the
Securities Act or Section 20 of the Exchange Act, from and against any and all
loses, claims, damages, liabilities (including, without limitation, any legal or
other expenses reasonably incurred in connection with defending or investigating
any such action or claim) insofar as such losses, claims, damages or liabilities
are caused by any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material
fact contained in any registration statement or any amendment thereof, any
preliminary prospectus or prospectus (as amended or supplemented if the Issuer
shall have furnished any amendments or supplements thereto) relating to the
Registrable Securities, or caused by any omission or alleged omission to state
therein a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the
statements therein not misleading, but only with reference to information
furnished in writing by such Selling Holder (or any representative thereof)
expressly for use in a registration statement, any preliminary prospectus,
prospectus or any amendments or supplements thereto. Each Selling Holder also
agrees to indemnify any underwriter of the Registrable Securities so offered and
each Person, if any, who controls such underwriter on substantially the same
basis as that of the indemnification by such Selling Holder of the Issuer
provided in this Section 2.8(b).
(c) Each party indemnified under paragraph (a) or (b) above shall, promptly
after receipt of notice of a claim or action against such indemnified party in
respect of which indemnity may be sought hereunder, notify the indemnifying
party in writing of the claim or action; provided that the failure to notify the
indemnifying party shall not relieve it from any liability that it may have to
an indemnified party on account of the indemnity agreement contained in
paragraph (a) or (b) above except to the extent that the indemnifying party was
actually prejudiced by such failure, and in no event shall such failure relieve
the indemnifying party from any other liability that it may have to such
indemnified party. If any such claim or action shall be brought against an
indemnified party, and it shall have notified the indemnifying party thereof,
unless based on the written advice of counsel to such indemnified party a
conflict of interest between such indemnified party and indemnifying parties may
exist in respect of such claim, the indemnifying party shall be entitled to
participate therein, and, to the extent that it wishes, jointly with any other
similarly notified indemnifying party, to assume the defense thereof. After
notice from the indemnifying party to the indemnified party of its election to
assume the defense of such claim or action, the indemnifying party shall not be
liable to the indemnified party under this Section 2.8 for any legal or other
expenses subsequently incurred by the indemnified party in connection with the
defense thereof. Any indemnifying party against whom indemnity may be sought
under this Section 2.8 shall not be liable to indemnify an indemnified party if
such indemnified party settles such claim or action without the consent of the
indemnifying party. The indemnifying party may not agree to any settlement of
any such claim or action, other than solely for monetary damages for which the
indemnifying party shall be
D-8
<PAGE> 205
responsible hereunder, the result of which any remedy or relief shall be applied
to or against the indemnified party, without the prior written consent of the
indemnified party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In any
action hereunder as to which the indemnifying party has assumed the defense
thereof, the indemnified party shall continue to be entitled to participate in
the defense thereof, with counsel of its own choice, but the indemnifying party
shall not be obligated hereunder to reimburse the indemnified party for the
costs thereof.
(d) If the indemnification provided for in this Section 2.8 shall for any
reason be unavailable (other than in accordance with its terms) to an
indemnified party in respect of any loss, liability, cost, claim or damage
referred to therein, then each indemnifying party shall, in lieu of indemnifying
such indemnified party, contribute to the amount paid or payable by such
indemnified party as a result of such loss, liability, cost, claim or damage (i)
in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect the relative benefits received
by the Issuer on the one hand and the Selling Holders on the other hand from the
offering of the Registrable Securities or (ii) if the allocation provided by
clause (i) above is not permitted by applicable law, in such proportion as is
appropriate to reflect not only the relative benefits referred to in clause (i)
above but also the relative fault of the indemnifying party or parties on the
one hand and of the indemnified party or parties on the other hand in connection
with the statements or omissions that resulted in such losses, claims, damages
or liabilities, as well as any other relevant equitable considerations. The
relative benefits received by the Issuer on the one hand and the Selling Holders
on the other hand in connection with the offering of the Registrable Securities
shall be deemed to be in the same respective proportions as the net proceeds
from the offering of the Registrable Securities (before deducting expenses)
received by the Issuer and the Selling Holders, respectively, bear to the
aggregate public offering price of the Registrable Securities. The relative
fault of the Issuer on the one hand and the Selling Holders on the other hand
shall be determined by reference to, among other things, whether the untrue or
alleged untrue statement of a material fact or the omission or alleged omission
to state a material fact relates to information supplied by the Issuer or a
Selling Holder and the parties' relative intent, knowledge, access to
information and opportunity to correct or prevent such statement or omission.
The amount paid or payable by an indemnified party as a result of the loss,
cost, claim, damage or liability, or action in respect thereof, referred to
above in this paragraph (d) shall be deemed to include, for purposes of this
paragraph (d), any legal or other expenses reasonably incurred by such
indemnified party in connection with investigating or defending any such action
or claim. The Issuer and the Selling Holders agree that it would not be just and
equitable if contribution pursuant to this Section 2.8 were determined by pro
rata allocation or by any other method of allocation which does not take account
of the equitable considerations referred to in this paragraph. Notwithstanding
any other provision of this Section 2.8, no Selling Holder shall be required to
contribute any amount in excess of the amount by which the total price at which
the Registrable Securities of such Selling Holder were offered to the public
exceeds the amount of any damages which such Selling Holder has otherwise been
required to pay by reason of such untrue or alleged untrue statement or omission
or alleged omission. No Person guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation (within
the meaning of Section 11(f) of the Securities Act) shall be entitled to
contribution from any Person who was not guilty of such fraudulent
misrepresentation.
(e) The obligations of the parties under this Section 2.8 shall be in
addition to any liability which any party may otherwise have to any other party.
SECTION 2.9. Holdback Agreement. If the Demand Registration pursuant to
this Article 2 shall be in connection with an underwritten public offering of
Registrable Securities, each Selling Holder agrees not to effect any sale or
distribution, including any sale under Rule 144, of any equity security of the
Issuer (otherwise than through the registered public offering then being made),
within 7 days prior to or 90 days (or such lesser period as the lead or managing
underwriters may permit) after the effective date of the applicable registration
statement.
D-9
<PAGE> 206
ARTICLE 3
MISCELLANEOUS
SECTION 3.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersedes all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
SECTION 3.2. Assignment. No party may assign any of its rights or
obligations hereunder by operation of law or otherwise without the prior written
consent of the other parties.
SECTION 3.3. Amendments, Waivers, Etc. This Agreement may not be amended,
changed, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified or terminated, except upon
the execution and delivery of a written agreement executed by the Issuer and
Holders representing a majority of the Registrable Securities then held by all
Holders.
SECTION 3.4. Notices. All notices, requests, claims, demands and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given (and shall be
deemed to have been duly received if given) by hand delivery or telecopy, or by
any courier service, such as Federal Express, providing proof of delivery. All
communications hereunder shall be delivered to the respective parties at the
address or telecopy number set forth on the signature pages hereto (unless such
contact information in the case of the Holders is updated pursuant to Section
2.3(a) or by written notice from the affected Holder to the Issuer).
SECTION 3.5. Severability. Whenever possible, each provision or portion of
any provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be
effective and valid under applicable law but if any provision or portion of any
provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in
any respect under any applicable law or rule in any jurisdiction, such
invalidity, illegality or unenforceability will not affect any other provision
or portion of any provision in such jurisdiction, and this Agreement will be
reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid,
illegal or unenforceable provision or portion of any provision had never been
contained herein.
SECTION 3.6. No Waiver. The failure of any party hereto to exercise any
right, power or remedy provided under this Agreement or otherwise available in
respect hereof at law or in equity, or to insist upon compliance by any other
party hereto with its obligations hereunder, and any custom or practice of the
parties at variance with the terms hereof, shall not constitute a waiver by such
party of its right to exercise any such or other right, power or remedy or to
demand such compliance.
SECTION 3.7. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended
to be for the benefit of, and shall not be enforceable by, any Person who or
which is not a party hereto; provided, that, this Agreement is also intended to
be for the benefit of and is enforceable by each Holder.
SECTION 3.8. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to
the principles of conflicts of law thereof.
SECTION 3.9. Jurisdiction. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the
exclusive jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York or any state court sitting in the City of New York, Borough
of Manhattan in any action, suit or proceeding arising in connection with this
Agreement, and agrees that any such action, suit or proceeding shall be brought
only in such courts (and waives any objection based on forum non convenience or
any other objection to venue therein); provided, however, that such consent to
jurisdiction is solely for the purpose referred to in this Section 3.9 and shall
not be deemed to be a general submission to the jurisdiction of said courts or
in the State of New York other than for such purposes. Each party hereto hereby
waives any right to a trial by jury in connection with any such action, suit or
proceeding.
SECTION 3.10. Descriptive Headings. The descriptive headings used herein
are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be part
of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
D-10
<PAGE> 207
SECTION 3.11. Holders' Agent. Each Zell Holder hereby appoints
Zell/Chilmark Fund, L.P. as its agent and attorney-in-fact (the "Zell Holders'
Agent") for purposes of the delivery and receipt of all notices and requests
pursuant to this Agreement. The Issuer may give notice to any Zell Holder
hereunder by giving such notice directly to such Holder. Alternatively, the
Issuer may request that the Zell Holders' Agent deliver to each Zell Holder any
notice given by the Issuer hereunder, in which event the Zell Holders' Agent
will promptly so give such notice to each Zell Holder. Prompt delivery by the
Zell Holders' Agent to the Zell Holders will be deemed satisfied if delivery is
made to the Zell Holders, in accordance with Section 3.4, not later than the
third business day after actual receipt of the applicable notice or document by
the Zell Holders' Agent from the Issuer. Notwithstanding anything else contained
herein, the Zell Holders' Agent will not be liable or responsible to any Person
should any Zell Holder fail to act in accordance with any notice so given to
such Zell Holder hereunder.
SECTION 3.12. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterpart,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which, taken
together, shall constitute one and the same Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer and the Holders have caused this Agreement
to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
By: /s/ RANDALL MAYS
--------------------------------
Name: Randall Mays
Address: 200 Concord Plaza,
Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78216
Facsimile No.: (210)
822-2299
HOLDERS:
ZELL/CHILMARK FUND, L.P.
By: ZC Limited Partnership, general partner
By: ZC Partnership, general partner
By: ZC Inc., a partner
SAMSTOCK, L.L.C.
By: SZ Investments, L.L.C., its sole member
By: Zell General Partnership, Inc.,
a member
By: /s/ SHELI Z. ROSENBERG
-----------------------------------------------------
Name: Sheli Z. Rosenberg
Address: 2 North Riverside Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Facsimile No.: (312) 454-0531
By: /s/ SHELI Z. ROSENBERG
-----------------------------------------------------
Name: Sheli Z. Rosenberg
Address: 2 North Riverside Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Facsimile No.: (312) 207-5243
SZ2 (IGP) PARTNERSHIP
By: /s/ SHELI Z. ROSENBERG
-----------------------------------------------------
Name: Sheli Z. Rosenberg
Address: 2 North Riverside Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Facsimile No.: (312) 454-0531
/s/ SAMUEL ZELL
- ------------------------------------------------------
SAMUEL ZELL
Address: 2 North Riverside Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Facsimile No.: (312) 207-5243
D-11
<PAGE> 208
ANNEX E
[LETTERHEAD OF SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC.]
October 8, 1998
Board of Directors
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
200 Concord Plaza
Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Dear Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as investment bankers as to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to Clear Channel Communications, Inc. ("Clear
Channel") of the Exchange Ratio (as defined below) contemplated by the Agreement
and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") by and among Clear Channel, CCU
Merger Sub, Inc. ("Merger Sub"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Clear Channel, and
Jacor Communications, Inc. ("Jacor") to be entered into in connection with the
proposed merger (the "Merger") of Merger Sub with and into Jacor. Pursuant to
the Merger Agreement, each share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of Jacor (the "Jacor Common Stock") issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the effective time of the Merger (other than Canceled Shares (as defined in
Section 2.3(a) of the Merger Agreement)) will be converted into the right to
receive either: (i) 1.40 shares (the "1.40 Fixed Exchange Ratio") of the common
stock, $0.10 par value per share, of Clear Channel (the "Clear Channel Common
Stock") if the Average Closing Price (as defined in Section 2.3(b) of the Merger
Agreement) of the Clear Channel Common Stock is less than or equal to $42.86 per
share; (ii) that number of shares of Clear Channel Common Stock that will value
the Jacor Common Stock at $60.00 per share when measured against the Average
Closing Price (the "Floating Exchange Ratio") if the Average Closing Price of
the Clear Channel Common Stock is greater than $42.86 per share and less than or
equal to $44.44 per share (such Floating Exchange Ratio will be between 1.40x
and 1.35x); (iii) 1.35 shares (the "1.35 Fixed Exchange Ratio") of Clear Channel
Common Stock if the Average Closing Price of the Clear Channel Common Stock is
greater than $44.44 per share and less than $50.00 per share; or (iv) that
number of shares of Clear Channel Common Stock that will equal the quotient
obtained by dividing (a) the sum of (I) $67.50 plus (II) the result obtained by
multiplying 0.675 times the excess of the Average Closing Price over $50.00 by
(b) the Average Closing Price (the "Declining Exchange Ratio" and, collectively
with the 1.40 Fixed Exchange Ratio, the Floating Exchange Ratio and the 1.35
Fixed Exchange Ratio, the "Exchange Ratio") if the Average Closing Price of the
Clear Channel Common Stock is equal to or greater than $50.00 per share (such
Declining Exchange Ratio will be 1.35x or less). In addition, if the Average
Closing Price of the Clear Channel Common Stock is equal to or less than $37.50
per share, Jacor will have the right to terminate the Merger Agreement.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, (i) Clear Channel and certain
stockholders of Jacor (the "Jacor Stockholders") propose to enter into an
agreement pursuant to which each Jacor Stockholder will agree, among other
things, to vote its shares of Jacor Common Stock in favor of the Merger and (ii)
Jacor and certain stockholders of Clear Channel (the "Clear Channel
Stockholders") propose to enter into an agreement pursuant to which each Clear
Channel Stockholder will agree, among other things, to vote its shares of Clear
Channel Common Stock in favor of the Merger.
We understand that the Merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free
reorganization for federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 368
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The terms and conditions of
the Merger are set forth in more detail in the Merger Agreement.
In connection with rendering our opinion, we have, among other things: (i)
reviewed the October 8, 1998 draft of the Merger Agreement, including the
exhibits thereto and certain documents referred to therein, in the form provided
to us and have assumed that the final form of such agreement will not vary in
any respect
E-1
<PAGE> 209
[LETTERHEAD OF SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC.]
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
October 8, 1998
Page 2
that is material to our analysis; (ii) reviewed certain publicly available
business and financial information that we deemed relevant relating to Clear
Channel and Jacor and the industries in which they operate; (iii) reviewed
certain internal non-public financial and operating data and other information
provided to us by the managements of Clear Channel and Jacor relating to Clear
Channel's and Jacor's businesses, including certain forecast and projection
information as to the future financial results of such businesses; (iv) reviewed
certain publicly available business and financial information with respect to
certain other companies that we believed to be relevant or comparable in certain
respects to Clear Channel and Jacor, and the trading markets for such other
companies' securities; (v) reviewed and analyzed certain publicly available and
other information concerning the trading of, and the trading market for, the
Clear Channel Common Stock and the Jacor Common Stock; (vi) reviewed the
financial terms of certain business combinations and acquisition transactions we
deem reasonably comparable to the Merger and otherwise relevant to our inquiry;
(vii) discussed with members of Clear Channel's and Jacor's senior managements
and other officers and employees of Clear Channel and Jacor the foregoing,
including the past and current business operations, financial condition and
prospects of Clear Channel and Jacor, respectively, before and after giving
effect to the Merger; and (viii) considered such other information, financial
studies, analyses, investigations and financial, economic, market and trading
criteria as we deemed relevant to our inquiry.
In our review and analysis and in arriving at our opinion, we have assumed
and relied upon, without assuming any responsibility for verification, the
accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information provided
to, discussed with, or reviewed by or for us, or publicly available. With
respect to Clear Channel's and Jacor's financial projections, we have assumed
that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgements on the part of management of Clear Channel or
Jacor, as to the future financial performance of Clear Channel or Jacor, as the
case may be. We express no view as to such projections or information or the
assumptions on which they are based. We have not assumed any responsibility for
making or obtaining any independent evaluations or appraisals of any of the
assets or liabilities of Clear Channel or Jacor, nor for conducting a physical
inspection of the properties and facilities of Clear Channel or Jacor.
For purposes of rendering our opinion, we have assumed, in all respects
material to our analysis, that the representations and warranties of each party
contained in the Merger Agreement are true and correct, that each party will
perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under
the Merger Agreement and that all conditions to the consummation of the Merger
will be satisfied without waiver thereof. We have also assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals will be obtained and
that in the course of obtaining any necessary governmental, regulatory or other
consents and approvals, or any amendments, modifications or waivers to any
documents to which either Clear Channel or Jacor is a party, as contemplated by
the Merger Agreement, no restrictions will be imposed or amendments,
modifications or waivers made that would have any material adverse effect on the
contemplated benefits of the Merger.
Our opinion necessarily is based on market, economic and other conditions
as they exist and can be evaluated on the date hereof, and we assume no
responsibility to update or revise our opinion based upon circumstances or
events occurring after the date hereof. Our opinion does not address Clear
Channel's underlying business decision to effect the Merger or constitute a
recommendation to any holder of Clear Channel Common Stock as to how such holder
should vote with respect to the Merger. Our opinion as expressed below does not
imply any conclusion as to the likely trading range for the Clear Channel Common
Stock or the Jacor Common Stock following the announcement or consummation of
the Merger, which may
E-2
<PAGE> 210
[LETTERHEAD OF SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC.]
Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
October 8, 1998
Page 3
vary depending upon, among other factors, changes in interest rates, dividend
rates, market conditions, general economic conditions and other factors that
generally influence the price of securities.
As you are aware, Salomon Smith Barney Inc. has acted as financial advisor
to Clear Channel in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee for such
services, a portion of which will be received in connection with the delivery of
this opinion and a portion of which will be received upon the consummation of
the Merger. In addition, Clear Channel has agreed to indemnify us for certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement. We, in the ordinary course of
business, have from time to time provided, and in the future may continue to
provide, investment banking, financial advisory and other related services to
Clear Channel, Jacor and/or their respective affiliates, as the case may be, for
which we have or will receive fees. In the ordinary course of business, we or
our affiliates may trade in the debt and equity securities of Clear Channel,
Jacor, and/or their respective affiliates, as the case may be, for our own
accounts and for the accounts of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time
hold a long or short position in such securities.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, as of
the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to
Clear Channel.
Very truly yours,
/S/ SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC.
E-3
<PAGE> 211
ANNEX F
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE LETTERHEAD
October 7, 1998
Board of Directors
Jacor Communications, Inc.
50 E. RiverCenter Blvd.
Suite 1200
Covington, KY 41011
Dear Ladies and Gentleman:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness from a financial point of
view to the stockholders of Jacor Communications, Inc. (the "Company" or
"Jacor") of the Conversion Number (as defined below) pursuant to the terms of
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 8, 1998 (the "Agreement"),
by and among the Company, Clear Channel Communications, Inc. ("Parent") and CCU
Merger Sub, Inc. ("Merger Sub"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent, pursuant
to which Merger Sub will be merged (the "Merger") with and into the Company.
Pursuant to the Agreement, each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of the Company will be converted into a number (the "Conversion Number")
of duly authorized, validly issued and nonassessable shares of common stock, par
value $0.10 per share, of Parent ("Parent Common Stock") in accordance with the
following:
(i) If the Average Closing Price (as defined below) is less than or
equal to $42.86 and the Company has not terminated the Agreement pursuant
to Section 7.1(j) of the Agreement, the Conversion Number will be 1.4
shares of Parent Common Stock,
(ii) If the Average Closing Price is greater than $42.86 and less than
or equal to $44.44, the Conversion Number will be that number of shares of
Parent Common Stock with a value of $60.00, when measured at the Average
Closing Price,
(iii) If the Average Closing Price is greater than $44.44 and less
than $50.00, the Conversion Number will be 1.35 shares of Parent Common
Stock, and
(iv) If the Average Closing Price is greater than or equal to $50.00,
the Conversion Number will be the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the sum
of (x) $67.50 plus (y) the result obtained by multiplying $0.675 times the
excess of the Average Closing Price over $50.00 by (B) the Average Closing
Price.
"Average Closing Price" means the average of the closing prices for a share
of Parent Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. ("NYSE")
Composite Transaction Tape (as reported in The Wall Street Journal or, if not
reported thereby, any other authoritative source) for the twenty-five (25)
consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day prior to the closing
date of the Merger.
In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed, among other things, the
October 7, 1998 draft of the Agreement and the exhibits thereto. We also have
reviewed financial and other information that was publicly available or
furnished to us by the Company and Parent, including information provided during
discussions with their respective management. Included in the information
provided during discussions with the respective management were certain
financial projections of the Company for the period beginning January 1, 1998
and ending December 31, 2000 prepared by the management of the Company and
certain financial projections of Parent for the period beginning January 1, 1998
and ending December 31, 2000 provided by the management of Parent. In addition,
we have compared certain financial and securities data of the Company and Parent
with various other companies whose securities are traded in the public markets,
reviewed the historical stock prices
F-1
<PAGE> 212
and trading volumes of the common stock of the Company and Parent, reviewed
prices and premiums paid in certain other business combinations and conducted
such other financial studies, analyses and investigations as we deemed
appropriate for purposes of this opinion.
In rendering our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the accuracy and
completeness of all of the financial and other information that was available to
us from public sources, that was provided to us by the Company and Parent or
their respective representatives, or that was otherwise reviewed by us. With
respect to the financial projections supplied to us, we have assumed that they
have been reasonably prepared on the basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company and Parent as
to the future operating and financial performance of the Company and Parent,
respectively. We have not assumed any responsibility for making an independent
evaluation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities of the Company or Parent or
for making any independent verification of any of the information reviewed by
us. We have relied as to certain legal matters on advice of counsel to the
Company.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market, financial and other
conditions as they exist on, and on the information made available to us as of,
the date of this letter. It should be understood that, although subsequent
developments may affect this opinion, we do not have any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm this opinion as a result of changes in these conditions or
otherwise. We are expressing no opinion herein as to the prices at which Parent
Common Stock will trade at any time. Our opinion does not address the relative
merits of the Merger or other business strategies being considered by the
Company's Board of Directors, nor does it address the Board's decision to
proceed with the Merger. Our opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any
stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote on the proposed transaction.
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation ("DLJ"), as part of its
investment banking services, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses
and securities in connection with mergers, acquisitions, underwritings, sales
and distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and
valuations for corporate and other purposes. DLJ has performed investment
banking and other services for the Company in the past and has received usual
and customary compensation for such services including in the past two years (i)
acting as a lead manager in a $170 million senior subordinated notes offering in
December 1996, (ii) acting as a lead manager in a $229 million common stock
offering in May 1997, (iii) acting as a sole placement agent in a $150 million
senior subordinated notes offering in June 1997, and (iv) acting as a lead
manager in a $256 million common stock offering and a $120 million senior
subordinated notes offering in February 1998.
Based upon the foregoing and such other factors as we deem relevant, we are
of the opinion that the Conversion Number is fair to the stockholders of the
Company from a financial point of view.
Very truly yours,
DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE
SECURITIES CORPORATION
By: /s/ MICHAEL K. HOOKS
-----------------------------------------
Michael K. Hooks
Managing Director
F-2
<PAGE> 213
EXHIBIT 99.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JACOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
PROXY FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
THE METROPOLITAN CLUB
50 EAST RIVERCENTER BOULEVARD, 19TH FLOOR
COVINGTON, KENTUCKY
MARCH 26, 1999, 10:00 A.M., LOCAL TIME
The undersigned hereby appoints Randy Michaels, R. Christopher Weber and
Jon M. Berry, and each of them, as Proxy Holders for the undersigned, with full
power of substitution, to appear and vote all of the shares of Jacor
Communications, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special
Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Metropolitan Club, 50 East RiverCenter
Boulevard, 19th Floor, Covington, Kentucky on March 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m.,
local time, and at any adjournment thereof, and in their discretion to act upon
any other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment
thereof.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND WILL BE VOTED AS
YOU SPECIFY. IF NOT SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL.
Please mark sign and date this proxy on the reverse side and return the
completed proxy promptly in the enclosed envelope.
(Continued, and to be dated and signed on the reverse side.)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 214
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Reverse side)
If you plan to attend the Special Meeting, please check the box on the proxy
indicating that you plan to attend. The proposal is fully explained in the
enclosed Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. To vote your proxy, please MARK by placing an "X" in the
appropriate box, SIGN and DATE the proxy. Then please DETACH and RETURN the
completed proxy promptly in the enclosed envelope, postage prepaid.
PROXY
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO
APPROVE AND ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND APPROVE THE MERGER.
1. Proposal to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
October 8, 1998, among Clear Channel Communications, Inc., CCU Merger Sub,
Inc. and Jacor Communications, Inc. (the "Merger Agreement"), and approve the
merger.
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
Shares in your name(s)
------------------ [ ] Attend Meeting
Dated:
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Signature(s)
-------------------------------------
Signature(s)
NOTE: PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS NAME
APPEARS TO THE LEFT. Joint owners
should each sign. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator,
trustee or guardian, please give full
title.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
