SCHERER HEALTHCARE INC
SC 13D/A, 2000-09-05
SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS
Previous: SYMPHONY TELECOM INTERNATIONAL INC, 8-K/A, EX-99, 2000-09-05
Next: DAILY TAX FREE INCOME FUND INC, DEFA14A, 2000-09-05



================================================================================

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  SCHEDULE 13D
                                 Amendment No. 2


                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                            SCHERER HEALTHCARE, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                (Name of issuer)

                          Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                   806530-10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 (Cusip Number)

   Bruce L. Newberg                                          Jon Brooks
11601 Wilshire Boulevard                             265 East 66th Street, #25F
 Los Angeles, CA 90025                                  New York, NY   10021

                                -with copies to-

                            Joseph F. Mazzella, Esq.
                          NUTTER MCCLENNEN & FISH, LLP
                            One International Place
                           Boston, Massachusetts 02110
                                 (617) 439-2000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive Notices and
                                 Communications)

                                September 5, 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Date of Event which Requires Filing of this Statement)

If the filing person has previously  filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report
the  acquisition  which is the subject of this  Schedule 13D, and is filing this
schedule because of Rule 13d-1(b)(3) or (4), check the following box [ ].

The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed
to be "filed" for the purpose of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934 ("Act") or otherwise  subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act
but  shall be  subject  to all other  provisions  of the Act  (however,  see the
Notes).

================================================================================
<PAGE>

--------------------------                            --------------------------
CUSIP No. 806530-10-1              SCHEDULE 13D/A              Page 2 of 5 Pages
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.                NAME OF REPORTING PERSON/S.S. OR I.R.S. IDENTIFICATION
                  NO. OF ABOVE PERSON

                  BRUCE L. NEWBERG
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.                CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX IF A MEMBER OF A GROUP    (A) [ ]
                                                                      (B) [X]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.                SEC USE ONLY

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.                SOURCE OF FUNDS

                  WC, OO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.                CHECK  BOX IF  DISCLOSURE  OF LEGAL  PROCEEDINGS  IS  REQUIRED
                  PURSUANT TO ITEMS 2(D) OR 2(E)                          [ ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.                CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION

                  USA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              7.      SOLE VOTING POWER

                                      0
   NUMBER OF                  --------------------------------------------------
    SHARES                     8.     SHARED VOTING POWER
 BENEFICIALLY
   OWNED BY                           203,748.78
    EACH                      --------------------------------------------------
  REPORTING                    9.     SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER
   PERSON
    WITH:                             0
                              --------------------------------------------------
                               10.    SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER

                                      203,748.78
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11.               AGGREGATE AMOUNT BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON

                  203,748.78
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12.               CHECK BOX IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT IN ROW (11) EXCLUDES
                  CERTAIN SHARES*                                          [ ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13.               PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY AMOUNT IN ROW (11)

                  4.7%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14.               TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON

                  IN
================================================================================

                      *SEE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE FILLING OUT!
          INCLUDE BOTH SIDES OF THE COVER PAGE, RESPONSES TO ITEMS 1-7
             (INCLUDING EXHIBITS) OF THE SCHEDULE, AND THE SIGNATURE
                                  ATTESTATION.



<PAGE>
--------------------------                            --------------------------
CUSIP No. 806530-10-1             SCHEDULE 13D/A               Page 3 of 5 Pages
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.                NAME OF REPORTING PERSON/S.S. OR I.R.S. IDENTIFICATION
                  NO. OF ABOVE PERSON

                  JON BROOKS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.                CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX IF A MEMBER OF A GROUP    (A) [ ]
                                                                      (B) [X]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.                SEC USE ONLY

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.                SOURCE OF FUNDS

                  PF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.                CHECK  BOX IF  DISCLOSURE  OF LEGAL  PROCEEDINGS  IS  REQUIRED
                  PURSUANT TO ITEMS 2(D) OR 2(E)                          [ ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.                CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION

                  USA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              7.      SOLE VOTING POWER

                                      121,425
   NUMBER OF                  --------------------------------------------------
    SHARES                     8.     SHARED VOTING POWER
 BENEFICIALLY
   OWNED BY                           0
    EACH                      --------------------------------------------------
  REPORTING                    9.     SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER
   PERSON
    WITH:                             121,425
                              --------------------------------------------------
                               10.    SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER

                                      0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11.               AGGREGATE AMOUNT BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON

                  121,425
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12.               CHECK BOX IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT IN ROW (11) EXCLUDES
                  CERTAIN SHARES                                          [ ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13.               PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY AMOUNT IN ROW (11)

                  2.8%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14.               TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON

                  IN
================================================================================

                      *SEE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE FILLING OUT!
          INCLUDE BOTH SIDES OF THE COVER PAGE, RESPONSES TO ITEMS 1-7
             (INCLUDING EXHIBITS) OF THE SCHEDULE, AND THE SIGNATURE
                                  ATTESTATION.


<PAGE>
CUSIP No.  806530-10-1            SCHEDULE 13D/A               Page 4 of 5 Pages
           -----------                                         -----------------

THIS  SCHEDULE 13D AMENDS AND  SUPPLEMENTS  THAT  CERTAIN  SCHEDULE 13D FILED ON
SEPTEMBER 17 , 1999, AS AMENDED ON JULY 18, 2000.

The  only  item  of the  Schedule  13D  amended  hereby  is  Item  4,  which  is
supplemented by the following information.


ITEM 4.  PURPOSE OF THE TRANSACTION

On July 18, 2000, the Reporting  Persons reported making an offer to acquire all
of the outstanding  capital stock of the Issuer for a price of $5.00, or higher,
per share in cash.  Such offer was made by letters dated July 18, 2000 (attached
as Exhibit B to Amendment  No. 1 to this  Schedule  13D).  Such  proposal is not
subject to any purchaser financing contingency,  but is subject to completion of
due diligence and execution of definitive purchase agreements.

Since the making of such proposal,  the Reporting  Persons have not received any
response from the Company,  and the Company has not indicated any willingness or
availability to discuss, negotiate or implement the Reporting Persons' proposal.
By letter dated September 5, 2000,  (attached as Exhibit D to this Amendment No.
2), the Reporting Persons:

a) informed the Board that the $5.00 per share offer will expire as of the close
of business on September  11,  2000,  unless the Board  accepts,  or enters into
serious discussions regarding such proposal; and

b) demanded that the Board disclose,  prior to the Annual  Meeting,  its reasons
for deciding not to take any "direct action" regarding the results of a recently
concluded  investigation  into whether Robert Scherer mis-used corporate assets,
and otherwise  breached his duties to shareholders.  The Reporting  Persons also
demanded that the Board disclose the nature of any wrongful actions indicated by
such  investigation,  in a manner that would allow shareholders to evaluate such
information prior to the election of directors at the Annual Meeting.

All other information  previously  reported  hereunder remains applicable and in
effect.

ITEM 5.    The Reporting Persons have not entered into any transactions in
securities of the Issuer within
    the past 60 days.

ITEM 7.  MATERIAL TO BE FILED AS EXHIBITS

Exhibit  B.  Letters  dated July 18,  2000 to the  Issuer's  Board of  Directors
             (previously filed).

Exhibit C. Press Release dated July 18, 2000 (previously filed).

Exhibit D. Letter dated September 5, 2000, filed herewith.

Exhibit E. Press Release dated September 5, 2000, filed herewith.

<PAGE>


CUSIP No.  806530-10-1               SCHEDULE 13D              Page 5 of 5 Pages
           -----------                                         -----------------

After  reasonable  inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify
that the information set forth in this statement is true,  complete and correct.
This  statement  may be  executed in any number of  counterparts,  each of which
shall  be  deemed  an  original  and  all of  which  shall  constitute  one  (1)
instrument.


Date:    September 5, 2000                           /S/ Bruce L. Newberg
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Bruce L. Newberg


Date:    September 5, 2000                           /S/ Jon Brooks
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Jon Brooks


<PAGE>
                                                                       EXHIBIT D


                                                               September 5, 2000
By Fax

Non-Employee Members of the
Board of Directors
Scherer Healthcare Inc.
120 Interstate N. Parkway, S.E.
Suite 305
Atlanta, Georgia  30339

Dear Sirs:

         It has now been seven  weeks  since we  formally  proposed to the Board
that we acquire all of the outstanding  stock of the Company for $5.00 per share
in  cash--more  than a 40% premium over the closing  price on July 14, 2000.  We
have followed up with several unsuccessful  attempts to commence discussions and
to proceed.

         Since we  submitted  our offer on July 18,  2000,  we have  received no
response  whatsoever  from the  Company.  We have not  received any requests for
further  information.  We have not been  asked to  clarify  or modify our offer.
Despite  the fact that we have  offered  the Board a  material  and  unequivocal
benefit to public shareholders, you have made no effort whatsoever to contact us
to discuss, negotiate or implement it.

         In fact,  the only  communication  we have  received  from the Board is
notification that it has "completed its investigation" of whether Robert Scherer
has mis-used and wasted  corporate assets for personal  purposes,  and otherwise
breached  his duties to  shareholders.  Even then,  rather  than  disclose  what
inappropriate activities may have been found, you have only informed us that you
have decided "not to take any direct  action"  regarding the results of this new
investigation.  Are  shareholders to conclude that wrongful  actions were found,
but that the Board has  chosen  to do  nothing?  If so,  such  inaction  further
indicates  that this Board is only  prepared to act to protect the  interests of
Robert Scherer.

         As you well know,  under the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, you are
obligated  to disclose  any and all facts that are  material to a  shareholder's
evaluation of the competence  and  qualifications  of the nominees  standing for
election at the  Company's  Annual  Meeting.  Your  decision  not to take action
regarding a  Director's  wrongful  behavior is not  dispositive  of whether such
behavior must be disclosed to  shareholders  who will cast votes for  directors.
Accordingly, as shareholders, we hereby demand that you supplement the Company's
proxy  material  to  fully  and  accurately  disclose  the full  results  of the
investigation,  and the basis on which the Board has  determined not to take any
"direct action" with regard to such results.  We submit that the results of such
investigation,  and the Board's reasons for not taking action, are material to a
shareholder's  evaluation of the competence and qualifications of each member of
the Board.

<PAGE>

         The Board's  continued  disregard for public  shareholders has left us,
and other shareholders as well, more than amazed- we are appalled.

         We cannot think of any other situation where a public company Board has
simply ignored a legitimate,  premium priced offer that would materially benefit
public shareholders. In fact, it appears that by treating public shareholders as
nothing more than a powerless,  second class of shareholder  you have, de facto,
created a second class of shares without  announcing or disclosing the effect it
has on an investor.

         Despite your apparent desire to close your eyes to this opportunity for
shareholders,  our offer  stands.  However,  since we  believe  that we, and all
shareholders,  deserve  action before the Company's  Annual  Meeting,  we hereby
notify you that this offer shall expire as of the close of business on September
11, 2000.

         It should be self-evident that by allowing our offer to expire, without
an  alternative  that offers  shareholders  comparable  value,  the Board is not
fulfilling  its  responsibilities  to those  shareholders.  Public  shareholders
deserve,  and are entitled to demand, that this Board act in their interest,  or
be held responsible for not doing so. We hope the Board is not so complacent and
dominated by Robert  Scherer,  that it believes  that we and other  shareholders
will not do so.

         We look forward to your long overdue response.


                                     Very truly yours,



                                     Bruce Newberg
                                     Jon Brooks

Cc:  David M. Calhoun, Esq. (via fax)
     Craig M. Frankel, Esq., Frankel & Associates (via fax)

<PAGE>
                                                                       EXHIBIT E

                  SCHERER BOARD FAILS TO RESPOND TO $5.00 OFFER
                               BUYERS SET DEADLINE


         September 5, 2000. Boston, Massachusetts. Two long-time stockholders of
Scherer Healthcare Inc. (NASDAQ: SCHR) who, on July 18, 2000, offered to acquire
all common  stock of the Company for a cash price of $5.00 per share,  announced
that their offer would expire on September  11, 2000.  The  stockholders  did so
after the Company failed to respond in any way to the proposal,  notwithstanding
that the offer  represented a 40% premium over  pre-offer  market prices for the
Company's stock.

         The stockholders,  Bruce L. Newberg and Jon Brooks, already own over 7%
of the  Company's  stock and have  repeatedly  asked the Board to pursue  higher
values for shareholders through a sale,  repurchase of shares from stockholders,
or a going-private merger. Their $5 offer,  contained in a letter dated July 18,
2000,  and related  correspondence,  were included in a 13D filing made with the
SEC.

         In a letter dated September 5, 2000, the Stockholders  commented on the
Board's lack of response,  stating that:  "...it appears that by treating public
shareholders  as nothing more than a powerless,  second class of shareholder you
have,  de  facto,  created  a  second  class of  shares  without  announcing  or
disclosing the effect it has on an investor....  It should be self-evident  that
by allowing our offer to expire, without an alternative that offers shareholders
comparable  value,  the Board is not  fulfilling its  responsibilities  to those
shareholders. Public shareholders deserve, and are entitled to demand, that this
Board act in their interest, or be held responsible for not doing so."

         In their letter to the Board, filed with a Schedule 13D Amendment,  the
stockholders  also noted the Board's recent  notification that it would not take
"direct  action"  on the  results of a new  investigation  into  whether  Robert
Scherer had mis-used  corporate  assets,  and  otherwise  breached his duties to
shareholders.  They  demanded  that the results of that  investigation,  and the
basis for the  Board's  inaction,  be  disclosed  to  shareholders  prior to the
election of Directors on September 18, 2000.

         They  stated  in  their   letter:   "....rather   than   disclose  what
inappropriate activities may have been found, you have only informed us that you
have decided "not to take any direct  action"  regarding  the  results.....  Are
shareholders  to conclude that wrongful  actions were found,  but that the Board
has chosen to do nothing? If so, such inaction further indicates that this Board
is only prepared to act to protect the interests of Robert Scherer.... We submit
that the results of such  investigation,  and the Board's reasons for not taking
action,  are  material  to a  shareholder's  evaluation  of the  competence  and
qualifications of each member of the Board."

         In their original offer, the  stockholder's  noted that the acquisition
price of $5 per was based solely on the Company's publicly  available  financial
information,  and requested  that the Board  commence  discussions  on price and
other terms as soon as possible.  The proposal does not  contemplate a financing
contingency.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission