<PAGE>
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S)240.14a-11(c) or (S)240.14a-12
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL INC.
------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL INC.
------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
[X] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), or 14a-6(j)(2).
[_] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-
6(i)(3).
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:*
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- - --------
*Set forth the amount on which the filing is calculated and state how it was
determined.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
Notes:
<PAGE>
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R. E. HOWSON 1450 Poydras Street
Chairman of the Board and P.O. Box 61961
Chief Executive Officer New Orleans, Louisiana,
70161-1961
(504) 587-5682
July 6, 1994
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on Tuesday, August 9, 1994, in the
La Salle Ballroom of the Hotel Inter-Continental, 444 St.
Charles Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana, commencing at 9:30
a.m. local time. We look forward to greeting personally as
many of our stockholders as possible at the meeting.
We hope you will join us at this year's meeting; but,
whether or not you personally plan to attend, please take a
few minutes now to sign, date and return your Proxy in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope. Regardless of the number of
McDermott International shares you may own, your vote is
important.
Thank you for your continued interest in our Company.
Very truly yours,
R. E. HOWSON
<PAGE>
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
1450 POYDRAS STREET
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70112-6050
----------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 9, 1994
----------------
To the Stockholders of
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of
McDermott International, Inc., a Panama corporation, for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 1994 will be held in the La Salle Ballroom of the Hotel Inter-
Continental, 444 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana, on Tuesday, August
9, 1994, at 9:30 a.m. local time, for the following purposes:
(1) To elect four Directors to Class III of the Company's Board of
Directors;
(2) To consider and act upon a proposal to approve and adopt the 1994
Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan, as described in the Proxy
Statement;
(3) To consider and act upon a proposal to retain Ernst & Young as
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1995; and
(4) To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 30, 1994 as
the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and
to vote at the meeting and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
Stockholders are urged to sign the enclosed Proxy and return it promptly to
the Company in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in
the United States.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
LAWRENCE R. PURTELL
Secretary
Dated: July 6, 1994
<PAGE>
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
1450 POYDRAS STREET
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70112-6050
----------------
PROXY STATEMENT
----------------
The accompanying Proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of McDermott
International, Inc. (the "Company"), and the Company will bear all expenses
incurred in connection with such solicitation. It is expected that solicitation
of Proxies will be primarily by mail. Morrow & Co., Inc. has been engaged to
assist in the solicitation of Proxies for a fee of $7,000, plus out-of-pocket
expenses. In addition to solicitation by mail and by such proxy soliciting
firm, officers and regular employees of the Company may solicit Proxies by
personal interview and telephone and telegraph, for which they will receive no
additional compensation. Brokerage houses, banks and other custodians, nominees
and fiduciaries will be reimbursed for their customary out-of-pocket and
reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding materials to their clients who are
beneficial owners of shares. Any Proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its
exercise by written notice to the Secretary of the Company, by submission of
another Proxy having a later date or by voting in person at the meeting. This
Proxy Statement is first being mailed to stockholders on or about July 6, 1994.
VOTING AT MEETING
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on June 30, 1994, will
be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. There were outstanding at the record
date 53,638,915 shares of the Company's Common Stock ("Common Stock"), each of
which is entitled to one vote. On the record date, 100,000 shares of Common
Stock were held by McDermott Incorporated ("McDermott"), a Delaware
corporation, with its address at 1450 Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana.
The Company has been informed by McDermott that it will not vote its shares of
Common Stock at the meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares present in
person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions and
broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is
present but are not counted for any other purposes.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting, four Directors are to be elected to Class III of the
Board of Directors, each to hold office until the 1997 Annual Meeting and until
his successor is elected and qualifies. The persons named as proxies in the
enclosed Proxy have been designated by the Board of Directors and, unless
otherwise directed, intend to vote for the election of the nominees named below
under Class III to the Board of Directors. If any nominee named below should
become unavailable for election, the shares will be voted for
<PAGE>
such substitute nominee as may be proposed by the Board of Directors. No
circumstances are now known, however, that would prevent any of the nominees
from serving. Set forth under Class I and Class II are the names of other
Directors of the Company currently in office. Class I Directors are to serve
until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 1995 and Class II Directors are to
serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 1996. All Directors have been
elected previously as Directors of the Company by the stockholders except for
Messrs. Hattox and Turner, who, upon recommendation of the Directors Nominating
Committee, were elected by the Board of Directors to Class I and III,
respectively, effective June 14, 1993; Mr. Turner is now standing for re-
election as a Class III Director. Pursuant to the By-Laws of the Company, W. T.
Seawell, whose term will expire at the Annual Meeting, cannot be re-elected as
a director due to his attainment of retirement age. In order to maintain
balance among the classes as required by the Articles of Incorporation of the
Company, Mr. Dutt, elected to Class II of the Board of Directors effective
August 10, 1993, is now standing for election as a Class III Director.
The information appearing below with respect to the business experience of
each Director during the past five years, directorships held, and beneficial
ownership of the capital stock of the Company has been furnished by the
respective Directors individually as of May 10, 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIRECTOR
NAME AGE SINCE
---- --- --------
CLASS III NOMINEES
<S> <C> <C>
James L. Dutt................................................... 69 1983(1)
Chairman of the Board of Stratxx Ltd. (Management Consultants)
since 1986, and former Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Beatrice Companies, Inc.; he is a Director
of GATX Corporation.
Robert E. Howson................................................ 62 1981
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and of McDermott Incorporated since August 1988. Prior to
assuming this position, he was President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company and of McDermott Incorporated from
August 1987; he is a Director of McDermott Incorporated and
Whitney Holding Corporation.
James A. Hunt................................................... 63 1983(1)
President, James A. Hunt, Inc. (Investment Banking) since
January 1990. Prior to assuming this position, he was a partner
in Kalb, Voorhis & Co. (Investment Banking) from 1967 until
December 1989.
John N. Turner.................................................. 65 1993
Partner, Miller Thomson (Barristers & Solicitors), Toronto,
Canada since 1990. Prior to assuming this position, he was
Leader of Opposition of the Parliament of Canada since 1984; he
is a Director of E-L Financial Corporation, Harvard
International Technologies Ltd., The Loewen Group Inc. and
Noranda Forest Inc.
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIRECTOR
NAME AGE SINCE
---- --- --------
CLASS I DIRECTORS
<S> <C> <C>
Thomas D. Barrow................................................. 69 1985
Oil and Gas Exploration; he is a Director of GPS Technology and
Chairman of GX Technology (formerly GeoQuest Technology
Corporation).
John F. Bookout.................................................. 71 1988
Until his retirement in June 1988, Mr. Bookout was President and
Chief Executive Officer of Shell Oil Company; he is a Director
of The Investment Company of America.
Philip J. Burguieres............................................. 50 1990
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Weatherford
International Incorporated (Supplier of Products, Equipment and
Services to the Worldwide Petroleum Industry). He was formerly
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Panhandle
Eastern Corporation (Natural Gas Transmission), and prior to
that, he was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cameron Iron Works, Inc. (Manufacturer of Oil Tools, Ball Valves
and Forged Products); he is a Director of Texas Commerce
Bancshares, Inc. and Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation.
Brock A. Hattox.................................................. 46 1993
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
and of McDermott since March 1991. During the past five years,
and before assuming his present position, Mr. Hattox was Vice
President, Controller and Planning, of the Eaton Corporation
(Manufacturer of engineered products for automotive, industrial,
commercial and defense markets); he is a Director of McDermott
Incorporated.
CLASS II DIRECTORS
Theodore H. Black................................................ 65 1993
Until his retirement in October 1993, Mr. Black was Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Ingersoll-Rand Company
(Heavy Equipment Manufacturing) since 1988; he is a Director of
CPC International, Inc., General Public Utilities Corporation
and Ingersoll-Rand Company.
J. Howard Macdonald.............................................. 66 1985
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of NatWest Investment
Bank, prior to which he was Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of NatWest Investment Bank since January 1989; he is a
Director of Anglo American Insurance Co. plc, The BOC Group plc,
and The Weir Group plc.
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIRECTOR
NAME AGE SINCE
---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
William McCollam, Jr. .......................................... 69 1990
Energy Management Consultant, and President Emeritus of Edison
Electric Institute (Electric Utility Company Association) since
May 1990. From April 1978 to May 1990, he was President of
Edison Electric Institute.
John A. Morgan.................................................. 63 1983(1)
Partner in Morgan Lewis Githens & Ahn (Investment Banking) since
1982; he is a Director of Masco Corporation, MascoTech, Inc.,
FlightSafety International, Inc. and Trimas Corporation.
</TABLE>
- - --------
(1) Each of Messrs. Dutt, Hunt and Morgan served as a Director of McDermott
Incorporated (the former parent corporation of the Company) from 1982, 1974
and 1973, respectively, until he was elected a Director of the Company.
The only individuals currently considered Executive Officers of the Company
not identified above are:
Daniel R. Gaubert, 45, Vice President and Controller, of the Company and
of McDermott since February 1992. During the past five years, and before
assuming his present position, he was Corporate Controller of the Company
and of McDermott from July 1991; and prior to that Group Controller, Power
Generation Group of Babcock & Wilcox Investment Company and of The Babcock
& Wilcox Company;
William L. Higgins, III, 51, Executive Vice President and Group
Executive, Engineering and Industrial Group of McDermott and President and
Chief Operating Officer of McDermott Energy Services, Inc. since February
1993. During the past five years, and before assuming his present position,
Mr. Higgins was Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Domestic and
Southeast Asia Operations of the Company and of McDermott; Executive Vice
President and Group Executive, McDermott Marine Construction, and Senior
Vice President and Group Executive, McDermott Marine Construction;
Lawrence R. Purtell, 47, Senior Vice President and General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary of the Company and of McDermott since May 1993. During
the past five years, and before assuming his present position, Mr. Purtell
was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Carrier Corporation, a
United Technologies Corporation subsidiary, from December 1992; and prior
to that he was Corporate Secretary and Associate General Counsel of United
Technologies Corporation from June 1989;
Joe J. Stewart, 56, President and Chief Operating Officer of Babcock &
Wilcox Investment Company and The Babcock & Wilcox Company since February
1993. During the past five years, and before assuming his present position,
Mr. Stewart was Executive Vice President and Group Executive, Power
Generation Group of Babcock & Wilcox Investment Company and of The Babcock
& Wilcox Company from August 1990; and prior to that, Senior Vice President
and Group Executive, Power Generation Group of Babcock & Wilcox Investment
Company and of The Babcock & Wilcox Company;
4
<PAGE>
James J. Wildasin, 59, President and Chief Operating Officer of the
Company's McDermott Marine Construction Unit since February 1993. During
the last five years, and before assuming his present position, Mr. Wildasin
was Senior Vice President and Group Executive, North Sea, Middle East and
West Africa Operations of the Company from February, 1992; prior to that he
was Vice President and Group Executive, North Sea, Middle East and West
Africa Operations of the Company from July, 1991; prior to that he was Vice
President and General Manager, London Engineering of the Company; and prior
to that he was President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of McDermott-ETPM,
Inc.;
Edgar Allen Womack, Jr., 51, Senior Vice President and Chief Technical
Officer of the Company and of McDermott since February 1993. During the
last five years, and before assuming his present position, Mr. Womack was
Senior Vice President, Research and Development and Contract Research
Divisions of Babcock & Wilcox Investment Company and The Babcock & Wilcox
Company from August 1991; and prior to that Vice President, Research and
Development and Contract Research Divisions of Babcock & Wilcox Investment
Company and The Babcock & Wilcox Company; and
Richard E. Woolbert, 60, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer of the Company and of McDermott since August 1991. During the past
five years, and before assuming his present position, Mr. Woolbert was Vice
President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company and of McDermott
from November 1988.
5
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the number of shares of each class of voting
securities of the Company beneficially owned by all current Directors and the
named executive officers of the Company as a group (16 persons) as of May 10,
1994.
AS OF MAY 10, 1994
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. COMMON STOCK
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES PERCENT
BENEFICIALLY OF
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OWNED CLASS
- - ------------------ ------------ -------
<S> <C> <C>
Thomas D. Barrow(1)(2)..................................... 23,025 *
Theodore H. Black(2)....................................... 6,425 *
John F. Bookout(2)......................................... 4,025 *
Philip J. Burguieres(2).................................... 4,025 *
James L. Dutt(2)........................................... 3,475 *
Brock A. Hattox(3)......................................... 72,320 *
Robert E. Howson(3)........................................ 355,509 *
James A. Hunt(2)........................................... 2,625 *
J. Howard Macdonald(2)..................................... 2,475 *
William McCollam, Jr.(2)................................... 4,475 *
John A. Morgan(2).......................................... 4,475 *
William T. Seawell(2)...................................... 3,525 *
Joe J. Stewart(3).......................................... 100,003 *
John N. Turner(2).......................................... 525 *
James J. Wildasin(3)....................................... 63,451 *
Richard E. Woolbert(3)..................................... 93,605 *
</TABLE>
Common Stock holdings of all directors and named executive officers as a
group were 742,813. All directors and named executive officers as a group own
1.39% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company.
- - --------
*Denotes ownership of less than one percent of the class outstanding.
(1) Does not include 5,000 shares as to which Mr. Barrow disclaims beneficial
ownership.
(2) In respect of each of Messrs. Dutt, Macdonald, McCollam and Morgan,
includes 1,650 shares of Common Stock; in respect of Messrs. Barrow,
Bookout, Burguieres, Hunt and Seawell, includes 1,350 shares of Common
Stock; in respect of Mr. Black, includes 950 shares each of Common Stock;
and in respect of Mr. Turner, includes 350 shares each of Common Stock;
which are issuable upon the exercise of certain stock options, currently
exercisable, held under the 1992 Director Stock Program. In respect of
Messrs. Dutt, Macdonald, McCollam and Morgan, includes 450 shares each of
Common Stock; in respect of Messrs. Barrow and Burguieres, includes 600
shares each of Common Stock; in respect of Messrs. Bookout, Hunt and
Seawell, includes 675 shares each of Common Stock; in respect of Mr. Black,
6
<PAGE>
includes 450 shares of Common Stock; and in respect of Mr. Turner, includes
175 shares of Common Stock; all of which have been purchased, subject to
plan restrictions, under the 1992 Director Stock Program.
(3) In respect of Messrs. Hattox, Howson, Stewart, Wildasin and Woolbert,
includes 42,460, 215,029, 53,413, 29,460 and 55,070 shares, respectively,
of Common Stock which are issuable upon the exercise of certain stock
options, currently exercisable, held under the 1983 and 1987 Long-Term
Performance Incentive Compensation Programs and 1992 Officer Stock
Incentive Program. In respect of Messrs. Hattox, Howson, Stewart, Wildasin
and Woolbert, includes 29,860, 112,820, 43,845, 31,420 and 29,240 shares,
respectively, of Common Stock which have been purchased, subject to plan
restrictions, under the 1987 Long-Term Performance Incentive Compensation
Program and 1992 Officer Stock Incentive Program.
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF MORE THAN 5% OF ANY CLASS OF VOTING SECURITIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMOUNT AND
NATURE OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL PERCENT
TITLE OF CLASS BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP* OF CLASS
-------------- ------------------------ ---------- --------
<C> <S> <C> <C>
Common Stock..................... Putnam Investments, Inc. 2,755,600** 5.2%
One Post Office Square
Boston, MA 02109
Common Stock..................... Norwest Corporation 3,497,629*** 6.7%
Sixth and Marquette
Minneapolis, MN 55479-
1000
Common Stock..................... FMR Corp. 3,742,431**** 7.18%
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
Common Stock..................... Delaware Management 5,347,530***** 10.03%
Company, Inc.
1818 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
</TABLE>
- - --------
* Sole voting and investment power unless otherwise noted.
** As reported on a Schedule 13-G by Putnam Investments, Inc., a subsidiary of
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., dated January 26, 1994.
*** As reported on a Schedule 13-G dated February 4, 1994.
**** As reported on a Schedule 13-G dated February 14, 1994.
***** As reported on a Schedule 13-G dated March 31, 1994.
7
<PAGE>
AUDIT, COMPENSATION AND DIRECTORS NOMINATING COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors of the Company has several standing committees,
including the Audit, Directors Nominating and Compensation Committees.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Macdonald (Chairman),
Barrow, Black, Burguieres, Hunt and McCollam. During the last fiscal year, the
Audit Committee met three times. The functions of the Audit Committee include
reviewing the accounting principles and practices employed by the Company and,
to the extent the Committee deems appropriate, by the Company's subsidiaries;
meeting with the Company's independent auditors to review their report on their
examination of the Company's accounts, their comments on the internal controls
and audit procedures of the Company and the action taken by Management with
regard to such comments; approving professional services, including non-audit
services, rendered by such independent auditors; and recommending annually to
the Board of Directors the appointment of the Company's independent auditors.
The Directors Nominating Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Hunt
(Chairman), Dutt, McCollam, Morgan, Seawell and Turner. During the last fiscal
year, the Directors Nominating Committee met twice. The function of the
Directors Nominating Committee is to recommend nominees for election to the
Company's Board of Directors. The Directors Nominating Committee will consider
nominees recommended by stockholders for election as Directors. Any such
recommendation, together with the nominee's qualifications and consent to be
considered as a nominee, should be sent to the Secretary of the Company.
The Compensation Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Seawell
(Chairman), Black, Bookout, Hunt and Macdonald. During the last fiscal year,
the Compensation Committee met five times. The Compensation Committee
determines the salaries of all of the Company's officers elected to their
positions by the Board, and also reviews and makes recommendations regarding
the salaries of officers of the Company's subsidiaries; administers and makes
awards under the Company's Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan; and
administers and makes awards under the 1992 Officer Stock Incentive Program.
DIRECTORS' ATTENDANCE AND COMPENSATION
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 1994 there were seven meetings of the
Board of Directors of the Company. Each incumbent Director attended 75% or more
of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and of the Committees on which he
served. Each Director who is not an employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries receives an annual stipend of $23,000 plus a fee of $2,500 for
each Board meeting attended and a fee of $1,000 for each telephonic Board
meeting in which such Director participates.
The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $3,000 and
other members of the Audit Committee each receive an annual fee of $2,000. A
fee of $1,650 for each committee meeting attended is also received.
8
<PAGE>
The Chairmen of the Compensation Committee, the Directors Nominating
Committee, the Employee Benefits Committee, the Finance Committee and the
Technical Oversight Committee each receive an annual fee of $2,500, and other
members of those committees who are not employees of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries each receive an annual fee of $1,750. A fee of $1,650 for each
committee meeting attended is also received.
The Company maintains an unfunded retirement plan in which all Directors who
are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries participate. The
Retirement Plan for Non-Management Directors of McDermott International, Inc.
provides an annual benefit equal to the greater of (1) 50% of the final average
three years of compensation received by the Director from the Company or (2)
the annual stipend (excluding meeting and committee fees and expenses) which
the Company paid non-management Directors immediately preceding the last annual
meeting held prior to the Director's retirement. Benefits are payable
quarterly, commencing upon the Mandatory Retirement Date or Disability (as such
terms are defined in the Plan). The number of quarterly payments due equals the
number of months of service as a Director. A death benefit is also provided in
the event that the Director dies prior to the last quarterly payment due under
the Plan. The Directors participate in the health care plan of McDermott under
the same terms and conditions applicable to employees.
On August 11, 1992, the Stockholders of the Company approved the 1992
Director Stock Program. The program, which is administered by a committee of
all the employees serving on the Board of Directors (the "Committee"), granted
to directors who are not employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries
stock options and rights to purchase stock in an aggregate of up to 50,000
shares of Common Stock. The options shall be granted at no less than 100% of
the fair market value on the date of grant. Generally, options become
exercisable in full six months after the date of grant, and remain exercisable
not more than ten years and one day after the date of grant.
Pursuant to the program, eligible directors were granted options to purchase
at fair market value 900, 300 and 300 shares on the first day of the first,
second and third years, respectively, of a director's term. Also pursuant to
the program, eligible directors were granted rights to purchase 450, 150 and
150 shares on the first day of the first, second and third years, respectively,
of a director's term at the purchase price of par value ($1.00 per share)
subject to restrictions on transfer. The restrictions generally lapse on all
stock purchased under grants made during a director's term at the end of such
term. In the event of a change in control of the Company, all such restrictions
shall lapse and the exercisability of any options outstanding will be
accelerated.
During the last fiscal year, 6,400 options were awarded under the 1992
Director Stock Program, and rights to purchase 3,200 shares were granted.
9
<PAGE>
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
Directors and Executive Officers, and persons who own more than 10% of the
Company's Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership
of such equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
and the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Directors, Executive Officers and greater
than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company
with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the
Company, or written representations that no forms were required, the Company
believes that its Directors, Executive Officers and greater than 10% beneficial
owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the most
recent fiscal year, except for Mr. J. P. Eckert, formerly President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company, and of McDermott, who filed a Form 4 six days
late during a month in which he was no longer an Executive Officer of the
Company but was still subject to Section 16 rules.
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS
The Company's Compensation Committee is comprised of five independent,
nonemployee directors who have no "interlocking" relationships with the
Company. The Committee exists to develop executive compensation policies that
support the Company's strategic business objectives and values. The duties of
this Committee include:
. The review and approval of the design of executive compensation programs and
all salary arrangements Company executives receive;
. Assessment of the effectiveness of the programs in light of compensation
policies;
. Evaluation of executive performance; and
. Assistance in succession planning.
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
The Committee works within an established philosophy for executive
compensation. This philosophy supports the Company's business strategies. These
strategies include to:
. Generate profits;
. Maximize shareholder value over the long term;
. Strengthen cash flow; and
. Provide products and services of the highest value.
10
<PAGE>
Our report to you last year discussed these compensation philosophies in
detail. They are summarized here for your review.
. Emphasize at-risk compensation. Balance short- and long-term compensation to
support the Company's business and financial strategic goals.
. Reflect positive, as well as negative, Company and individual performance in
pay.
. Encourage equity-based compensation to reinforce management's focus on
shareholder value.
. Provide adequate, fair, and competitive pay opportunities which will
attract, retain, and develop executive talent.
To address these four philosophies, Company executives participate in a
comprehensive compensation program. The key components of this program include
base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives (stock options and
restricted stock), and benefits.
Each of these components is reviewed by the Committee, as described
previously. To ensure the Company's pay is comparable to median market
practices, competitive market data is collected from multiple external sources.
The data collected is both on an industry-specific basis and an overall
industrial basis. The industry-specific comparison is collected using a group
of companies who tend to have national and international business operations
and similar sales volumes, market capitalizations, employment levels, and lines
of business. The Committee reviews and approves the selection of companies used
for this purpose and attempts to mirror the peer group reflected in the
Performance Graph. However, the comparator groups are not identical because the
market data used by the Company is much broader based than the companies
included in the Performance Graph peer group. This market information is
reviewed annually by the members of the Committee. The same market basis is
used for assessing all components of the Company executives' pay.
When setting compensation levels, the Committee considers each component of
an executive's pay. Certain quantitative formulas have been adopted for the
individual compensation plans themselves (e.g., incentive plans). However,
specific weights are not used in setting each component of pay relative to
another. Instead, the Committee uses a combination of the results of the
performance-based compensation determiners (mathematical formulas) and
discretion, depending on the particular component involved.
Each of the components of pay is discussed in greater detail below.
BASE SALARY
Salaries reflect an individual's level of responsibility, prior experience,
breadth of knowledge, personal contributions, position within the Company's
executive structure, and market pay practices. Overall, salaries are targeted
at the median of market salaries.
11
<PAGE>
A qualitative assessment of performance is considered when making annual
adjustments. Many factors are considered, including individual performance,
both past and present. The factors used in making this evaluation may vary by
position.
Mr. Howson received a 9.6 percent increase in fiscal year 1994 ($63,790).
This increase reflects the Committee's evaluation of Company financial
performance and Mr. Howson's individual contributions, both short and long
term. In addition, his base salary was reviewed in light of competitive data
for chief executive officers for relevant companies (see earlier discussion
regarding companies considered). Mr. Howson's salary is near the median of
these peers. Other executives' base pay increased in recognition of the factors
described previously. Mr. Wildasin's salary was increased by a more significant
amount in recognition of his promotion during late fiscal year 1993 to Chief
Operating Officer, McDermott Marine Construction.
ANNUAL INCENTIVES
The Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan was established in 1987 to
support the Company's short-term financial focus. Through this plan, executives
receive pay linked to, and determined by, annual performance.
For fiscal year 1994, the plan was tied to cash flow return on capital. The
plan is formula driven and self-funded, based on a minimum level of cash flow
return on capital to be achieved each year. Executives' opportunities under the
plan are expressed as a targeted percent of base salary. These targets, like
base salary, are set at approximately the median market levels, as indicated by
the group of similar companies. The Committee believes the goals associated
with target bonus payments are achievable, yet require considerable effort on
the part of each executive. Executives only receive payments under the plan if
the minimum level of performance is reached.
Mr. Howson's fiscal year 1994 bonus payment was $325,264, which represents 42
percent of his base salary in effect at the time of the payment (versus a 70%
target percent). This reflects the Company's audited performance relative to
cash flow return on capital. While performance exceeded the minimum required
level, it fell short of the previous year's performance. Therefore, Mr.
Howson's bonus payment was less than that received for fiscal year 1993. Like
Mr. Howson, bonuses paid to the other named executives decreased in comparison
with fiscal year 1993.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVES
The 1992 Officer Stock Incentive Program provides executives with long-term,
equity-based opportunities. Like base salary, the Committee considers multiple
factors when determining award sizes. Weightings between the factors (listed
below) are informal, not quantitative.
. Various financial performance criteria (which may include returns on capital
and assets, profitability, shareholder return);
12
<PAGE>
. Level of responsibility;
. Prior experience;
. Historical award data; and
. Market practices among similar companies.
STOCK OPTIONS
At the Company, stock options are granted at prices equal to fair market
value on the date of grant. Executives do not realize value unless stock price
rises above the price on the date of grant. This, in turn, creates value for
shareholders (a primary focus at the Company). In addition, stock options
encourage accumulation of stock ownership among executives.
Mr. Howson was granted 65,820 stock options in fiscal year 1994. These
options are priced at market value on the date of grant: $24.125. The face
value of the options granted is somewhat larger than those granted in fiscal
year 1993. An increased number of options was granted in order to provide Mr.
Howson with a grant which more closely resembled the median awards received by
his peers in industry. For this same reason, other named executives' awards
were increased as well. The face value of Mr. Wildasins' award increased by
more than the other named officers in recognition of his promotion during late
fiscal year 1993 to Chief Operating Officer, McDermott Marine Construction.
RESTRICTED STOCK
Restricted stock is also granted to certain executives to reinforce the
importance of share ownership and to focus executives on creating shareholder
value. One-half of each grant vests with performance; the other one-half vests
at the end of five years. Performance vesting allows restrictions to lapse
between the third and tenth anniversary of the date of grant. The specific
vesting dates are determined based upon the Company's average return on capital
versus a group of peer companies.
The peer companies are selected by the Compensation Committee based upon
industry relevance and market capitalization, as well as other factors. This
group remained fairly constant for the past six years, mirroring as closely as
possible the companies used in determining market pay levels. For awards made
in or after fiscal year 1994, the peer group is the same as those companies
represented in the performance graph.
Shares are forfeited in the event of a termination not caused by death,
disability, retirement, or a change in control. Executives receive voting and
dividend rights at the time of the grant.
Mr. Howson received an award of 24,520 restricted shares in fiscal year 1994.
This award closely resembles his fiscal year 1993 award. The Committee
considered Mr. Howson's total stock holdings, as well as his career restricted
stock awards when making this grant. The size of the grant is reflective of
median practices at comparable companies. Other named officers' awards varied
between years for a number of reasons, all of which are reflective of the
factors considered in the initial discussion of long-term incentives in this
report.
13
<PAGE>
OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT OF 1993
OBRA '93 introduced language to the Internal Revenue Code limiting the
deduction corporations can claim for executive compensation. Specifically,
compensation provided to the named executive officers in the proxy statement
must meet certain administrative and performance-based requirements, or its
deduction will be limited.
McDermott's 1994 Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan is being submitted
to shareholders for approval. With approval, these performance-based amounts
will continue to be tax deductible to the Company. The 1992 Officer Stock
Incentive Program also provides performance-based compensation. However, due to
the recent tax law changes, amendments may be necessary in the future to ensure
its continued compliance with the tax laws governing tax deductibility. Under
transition rules provided by the IRS, these amendments are not necessary at
this time.
We are continuing to monitor the ongoing drafting of tax law in this area to
ensure any further decisions made regarding the Company's executive
compensation program benefit from optimum information available.
CONCLUSION
These programs have been designed to support the Company and the
shareholders, while remaining fair and equitable to the Company's management
team. We monitor these programs and their effectiveness on an ongoing basis;
this responsibility remains a critical part of our charter.
William T. Seawell, Chairman
Theodore H. Black
John F. Bookout
James A. Hunt
J. Howard Macdonald
14
<PAGE>
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder
return on Company Common Stock with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500
Stock Index and a peer group index, which reflects the Company's two primary
business segments, composed of the common stock of CBI Industries, Inc., Cooper
Industries, Inc., Dresser Industries, Fluor Corporation, Foster Wheeler
Corporation, Halliburton Company, Offshore Pipelines, Inc., Raytheon Company,
Schlumberger Ltd., Stone & Webster Inc., Trinity Industries, United Dominion
Industries, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Zurn Industries, Inc., in
each case on a total return assuming reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly
basis for the period commencing March 31, 1989 and ending March 31, 1994.
(Baroid Corporation is not included in the peer group due to the merger between
Dresser Industries and Baroid Corporation effective as of January 24, 1994.)
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC; S&P 500; AND PEER GROUP
[GRAPH APPEARS HERE]
* Assumes $100 invested on March 31, 1989 in McDermott International, Inc.
common stock; S&P 500; and the Peer Group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
3/31/89 3/31/90 3/31/91 3/31/92 3/31/93 3/31/94
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
McDermott International, Inc.... $100.00 $151.63 $151.26 $140.93 $186.01 $140.70
Standard & Poor's 500........... $100.00 $119.18 $136.30 $151.28 $174.26 $176.84
Peer Group...................... $100.00 $139.05 $147.84 $130.18 $142.48 $139.43
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table summarizes the annual and long-term compensation of the
Company's Chief Executive Officer and four highest paid executive officers
(collectively, the "named executive officers") for 1994, 1993 and 1992:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION(1) LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
-------------------------- --------------------------
AWARDS
OTHER ------------------ PAYOUTS ALL
FISCAL ANNUAL RESTRICTED STOCK LTIP OTHER
NAME PRINCIPLE POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMP. STOCK(2) OPTIONS PAYOUTS COMP.(3)
---- ------------------ ------ -------- -------- -------- ---------- ------- ------- --------
<C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R.E. Howson. Chairman & Chief 1994 $729,210 $325,264 $ 41,496 $567,025 65,820 $ 0 $ 7,074
Executive Officer 1993 $665,420 $600,279 $ 21,166 $522,493 59,410 $ 0 $ 6,864
1992 $605,000 $555,087 $400,348 57,010 $ 0
B.A. Hattox. Senior VP & Chief 1994 $306,325 $ 92,008 $ 5,126 $178,756 18,860 $ 0 $27,074(5)
Financial Officer 1993 $285,275 $171,239 $ 5,683 $252,512 17,400 $ 0 $52,865(5)
1992 $258,625 $161,795 $135,188 17,490 $ 0
J.J. Stew- President & Chief 1994 $344,615 $119,849 $ 4,487 $217,838 24,060 $ 0 $ 7,074
art........
Operating Officer, 1993 $301,870 $224,724 $ 1,186 $301,517 20,770 $ 0 $ 6,861
Babcock & Wilcox 1992 $275,535 $208,050 $182,310 23,610 $ 0
J.J. President & Chief 1994 $103,508 $281,427(4) $182,919 20,200 $ 0 $ 7,074
Wildasin... $333,684
Operating Officer, 1993 $253,339 $189,054 $200,181(4) $273,611 14,160 $ 0 $ 6,866
McDermott Marine 1992 $215,870 $125,948 $102,356 13,260 $ 0
Construction
R. E. Senior VP & Chief 1994 $ 84,848 $ 13,569 $163,262 17,230 $ 0 $ 7,074
Woolbert... $280,085
Administrative 1993 $258,440 $156,441 $ 4,329 $152,460 15,750 $ 0 $ 6,865
Officer 1992 $227,410 $146,455 $210,699 15,390 $ 0
</TABLE>
- - --------
(1) Includes amounts earned in fiscal year, whether or not deferred.
(2) The total number of restricted shares and the aggregate market value at
March 31, 1994: Mr. Howson held 112,820 shares valued at $2,143,580; Mr.
Hattox held 29,860 shares valued at $567,340; Mr. Stewart held 43,845
valued at $833,055; Mr. Widasin held 31,420 shares valued at $596,980; Mr.
Woolbert Held 29,240 shares valued at $555,560. The aggregate market value
at year end is based on the fair market value of Company stock on March 31,
1994 of $20.00. Dividends are paid on the restricted shares at the same
time and at the same rate as dividends paid to shareholders of unrestricted
shares. Grants of restricted stock generally vest fifty percent in five
years with the remaining fifty percent vesting in three to ten years based
on performance. In the event of a change of control of the Company, the
Compensation committee may cause all restrictions to lapse.
(3) Relates to company matching contributions to Thrift/401(K) Plan.
(4) Includes commodities, services, housing, utilities, expenses and tax
equalization associated with Mr. Wildasin's international assignment.
(5) Includes $20,000 and $46,000, respectively, representing amounts paid to
Mr. Hattox as a signing bonus.
16
<PAGE>
OPTION GRANT TABLE
The following table shows, as to the named executive officers of the Company,
information about option grants in the last fiscal year. The Company does not
grant any Stock Appreciation Rights.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE
AT ASSUME ANNUAL RATES OF
STOCK APPRECIATION FOR 10
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS IN 1994 YEAR TERM(4)
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------
% OF TOTAL 5% 10%
OPTIONS ------------ --------------
OPTIONS GRANTED TO EXERCISE EXPIRATION DOLLAR
NAME GRANTED EMPLOYEES(2) PRICE(3) DATE DOLLAR GAINS GAINS
---- ------- ------------ -------- ---------- ------------ --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R.E. Howson............. 65,820 10.16 $24.1250 2/07/04 $998,819 $2,530,450
B.A. Hattox............. 18,860 2.91 $24.1250 2/07/04 $286,201 $725,073
J.J. Stewart............ 24,060 3.72 $24.1250 2/07/04 $365,111 $924,987
J.J. Wildasin........... 20,200 3.12 $24,1250 2/07/04 $306,535 $776,589
R.E. Woolbert........... 17,230 2.66 $24.1250 2/07/04 $261,465 $662,407
All Shareholders........ (1) -- $24.1250 -- $812,537,287 $2,058,517,034
Named executive officers' gains as a % of all shareholder's
gains........................................................... 0.2730% 0.2730%
</TABLE>
- - --------
(1) Total dollar gains based on the assumed annual rates of appreciation shown
here and calculated on 53,544,467 outstanding shares on March 31, 1994.
(2) Based on 647,640 options granted to all employees during the fiscal year
ended March 31, 1994. Options vest in equal installments of one-third
beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant through the third
anniversary of the date of grant and expire ten years from date of grant.
(3) Fair market value on date of grant.
(4) At a five percent and ten percent annual rate of appreciation, the stock
price would be approximately $39.30 and $62.57, respectively, if the
assumed annual rates of stock price appreciation shown were to be achieved.
17
<PAGE>
OPTION EXERCISES AND YEAR-END VALUE TABLE
The following table sets forth information concerning each exercise of stock
options during fiscal year 1994 by each of the named executive officers and the
value at March 31, 1994 of unexercised options held by such individuals.
Options generally vest in equal installments of one-third beginning on the
first anniversary of the date of grant through the third anniversary of the
date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant. In general, vesting
is contingent on continuing employment with the Company. In the event of a
change in control of the Company, the Committee may accelerate the
exercisability of any options outstanding. The value of unexercised options
reflects the increase in market value of Company Common Stock from the date of
grant through March 31, 1994 (when the closing price of Company Common Stock
was $20.00 per share.) The value actually realized upon exercise of the options
by the named executive officers will depend on the value of Company Common
Stock at the time of exercise.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION
VALUES TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER
OF TOTAL NUMBER OF TOTAL VALUE OF
SHARES UNEXERCISED OPTIONS HELD UNEXERCISED, IN-THE-MONEY
ACQUIRED AT FISCAL YEAR END OPTIONS HELD AT FISCAL YEAR-END
ON VALUE ------------------------- -------------------------------
NAME EXERCISE REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE(1) UNEXERCISABLE(1)
---- -------- -------- ----------- ------------- -------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
R.E. Howson............. 52,530 $797,799 215,029 124,431 $267,436 $10,690
B.A. Hattox............. 0 $ 0 42,460 36,290 $ 6,559 $ 3,279
J.J. Stewart............ 21,540 $325,476 53,413 45,777 $ 40,031 $ 4,427
J.J. Wildasin........... 11,200 $174,300 29,460 34,060 $ 36,023 $ 2,486
R.E. Woolbert........... 2,485 $ 39,760 55,070 32,860 $ 88,639 $ 2,886
</TABLE>
- - --------
(1) Based on a fair market value of Company stock on March 31, 1994 of $20.875.
18
<PAGE>
VARIABLE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION PLAN
The Company has a Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan based on the
achievement of certain performance standards for managerial and other key
employees, including officers, of the Company and its consolidated
subsidiaries. Under the Plan, the Aggregate Amount Available for Award in
respect of the 1994 fiscal year shall equal the sum of 1% of that portion of
Cash Flow for such year as would produce a Cash Flow Return on Capital of no
more than 14.5% plus 6% of Cash Flow in excess of such portion. Cash Flow
Return on Capital is defined as Cash Flow divided by Capital (as those terms
are defined in the Plan). Except on a selected basis, no awards will be made in
respect of a fiscal year during which Cash Flow Return on Capital does not
equal or exceed 14.5%. If an award is made during a fiscal year when the Cash
Flow Return on Capital requirement is not achieved, then the award, generally,
will be equal only to one-half of the guideline amounts set forth below.
Allocations of awards to eligible employees are made at the discretion of the
Compensation Committee, consisting of five Directors, none of whom is in the
employ of the Company or its subsidiaries, which may use the following
guidelines (expressed as a percentage of salary):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLASS POSITION % OF SALARY
----- -------- -----------
<C> <S> <C>
1 Chief Executive Officer................................. 70.0%
2 Chief Operating Officers................................ 55.0%
3 Executive and Senior VPs................................ 47.5%
4 VP and Group Executives................................. 40.0%
5 Division Head and Staff VPs............................. 35.0%
6 Other VPs and Controllers to COOs....................... 30.0%
7 Major Department Heads.................................. 25.0%
8 Other Department Heads.................................. 20.0%
9 Others.................................................. 15.0%
</TABLE>
Awards are payable to the recipients within thirty (30) days of the
Compensation Committee's determination, unless deferred by such recipients.
Awards may be deferred until termination of employment other than by retirement
or until up to fifteen (15) years after retirement and accrue interest,
compounded daily, at the minimum commercial lending rate of a designated bank,
until paid. The Plan is unfunded and no assets will be segregated to secure
payment of awards.
RETIREMENT PLANS
The Company maintains several funded retirement plans covering substantially
all regular full-time employees, except certain non-resident alien employees
who are not citizens of a European Community country or who do not earn income
in the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom. All officers and Directors
of the Company who are employees of the Company or certain of its subsidiaries,
including McDermott, are covered under the McDermott Retirement Plan. Officers
and Directors who are employed by The Babcock & Wilcox Company ("B&W"), a
subsidiary of the Company, or certain of its subsidiaries or
19
<PAGE>
affiliates, are covered under B&W's Employee Retirement Plan. Employees do not
contribute to either of the two plans and Company contributions are funded on
an actuarial basis. In order to comply with the limitations prescribed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, pension benefits
will be paid directly by the Company or a subsidiary under the terms of the
unfunded excess benefit plans maintained by McDermott and B&W (the "Excess
Plans") when such benefits are in excess of those permitted by such Act to be
paid from federal income tax qualified pension plans.
The following table shows the annual benefit under the McDermott Retirement
Plan payable at age 65 (the normal retirement age) to employees retiring in
1994 in accordance with the lifetime only method of payment and before profit
sharing plan offsets. Benefits are based on the formula of a specified
percentage (dependent on years of service) of average annual basic earnings
(exclusive of bonus and allowances) in the five consecutive years of the ten
years prior to retirement in which such earnings were highest ("Final Average
Earnings"). The average annual basic earnings and credited service under the
McDermott Retirement Plan at December 31, 1993 for Mr. Howson was $603,818, 22
years. Messrs. Hattox and Wildasin had less than three and five years,
respectively, of credited service under the McDermott Retirement Plan. Unless
elected otherwise by the employee, payment will be made in the form of a joint
and survivor annuity of equivalent actuarial value to the amount shown below.
MCDERMOTT RETIREMENT PLAN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FINAL ANNUAL BENEFITS AT AGE 65 FOR YEARS OF SERVICE INDICATED
AVERAGE -------------------------------------------------------------
EARNINGS 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
100,000 $14,373 $ 21,559 $ 29,215 $ 38,954 $ 48,692 $ 56,807 $ 64,926
125,000 18,539 27,809 37,079 48,954 61,192 71,390 81,593
150,000 22,706 34,059 45,412 58,954 73,692 85,974 98,261
200,000 31,039 46,559 62,079 78,954 98,692 115,140 131,596
250,000 39,373 59,059 78,745 98,954 123,692 144,307 164,931
300,000 47,706 71,559 95,412 119,265 148,692 173,473 198,266
400,000 64,373 96,559 128,745 160,932 198,692 231,806 264,936
500,000 81,039 121,559 162,079 202,598 248,692 290,139 331,606
550,000 89,373 134,059 178,745 223,432 273,692 319,306 364,941
600,000 97,706 146,559 195,412 244,265 298,692 348,472 398,276
</TABLE>
20
<PAGE>
The following table shows the annual benefit under the B&W Employee
Retirement Plan payable at age 65 (the normal retirement age) to employees
retiring in 1994 in accordance with the lifetime only method of payment.
Benefits are based on the formula of a specified percentage (dependent on the
level of wages subject to social security taxes during the employee's career)
of average annual earnings (inclusive of bonuses) in five consecutive years of
the ten years prior to retirement in which such earnings were highest ("Final
Average Earnings"). The average annual earnings and credited service under the
B&W Employee Retirement Plan at December 31, 1993 for Messrs. Stewart and
Woolbert were $369,325, 22 years; and $294,263, 38 years, respectively. Unless
elected otherwise by the employee, payment will be made in the form of a joint
and survivor annuity of equivalent actuarial value to the amount shown below.
BABCOCK & WILCOX RETIREMENT PLAN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FINAL ANNUAL BENEFITS AT AGE 65 FOR YEARS OF SERVICE INDICATED
AVERAGE -------------------------------------------------------------
EARNINGS 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
100,000 $11,885 $ 17,828 $ 23,770 $ 29,713 $ 35,655 $ 41,598 $ 47,540
125,000 15,010 22,515 30,020 37,525 45,030 52,535 60,040
150,000 18,135 27,203 36,270 45,338 54,405 63,473 72,540
200,000 24,385 36,578 48,770 60,963 73,155 85,348 97,540
250,000 30,635 45,953 61,270 76,588 91,905 107,223 122,540
300,000 36,885 55,328 73,770 92,213 110,655 129,098 147,540
400,000 49,385 74,078 98,770 123,463 148,155 172,848 197,540
500,000 61,885 92,828 123,770 154,713 185,655 216,598 247,540
550,000 68,135 102,203 136,270 170,338 204,405 238,473 272,540
600,000 74,385 111,578 148,770 185,963 223,155 260,348 297,540
</TABLE>
An unfunded supplemental retirement plan called the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the "SERP Plan") was established in June of 1980 by McDermott
and was amended to become a Plan of the Company in September of 1989. The SERP
Plan covers certain officers of the Company and other designated companies,
including McDermott and B&W, and originally only provided benefits to
participants who elected to retire prior to normal retirement age. The 1989
amendment added participants and provided benefits to such participants upon
retirement at normal retirement age. Original participants, upon the request of
the Chief Executive Officer and/or the Board of Directors, may now elect to
retire at normal retirement age and, in such circumstances, will receive
benefits under the SERP Plan. Benefits are based upon a specified percentage
(determined by age, years of service and date of initial participation in the
SERP Plan) of final 3-year average cash compensation (salary plus supplemental
compensation for the highest three out of the last ten years of service) or 3-
year average cash compensation prior to SERP Plan scheduled retirement date,
whichever is greater; the maximum benefit shall not exceed 60-65% (dependent
upon date of initial participation in the SERP Plan) of such 3-year average
cash compensation. Payments under the SERP Plan will be reduced by an amount
equal to pension benefits payable under any other retirement plan maintained
21
<PAGE>
by the Company, any of its subsidiary companies or any previous employer. A
death benefit is also provided under the SERP Plan. Before giving effect to
such reductions, the approximate annual benefit payable under the SERP Plan to
Messrs. Hattox, Howson, Stewart, Wildasin and Woolbert at retirement age as
stated in the SERP Plan is 60%, 65%, 60%, 31.75% and 65%, respectively, of each
such person's final 3-year average cash compensation.
The Company has caused the establishment of a trust (assets of the trust
constitute corporate assets) which is designed to ensure the payment of
benefits arising under the SERP Plan, the Excess Plans and certain other
contracts and arrangements (collectively, the "Plans") in the event of an
effective change in control of the Company. Although the Company would retain
primary responsibility for such payments, the trust would provide for payments
to designated participants, in the form of lump sum distributions, if certain
events occur following an effective change in control of the Company, including
but not limited to failure by the Company to make such payments and termination
of a participant's employment under certain specified circumstances. In
addition, with respect to benefits which otherwise would have been paid in the
form of an annuity, the trust provides for certain lump sum equalization
payments which, when added to the basic lump sum payments described above,
would be sufficient, after payment of all applicable taxes, to enable each
active participant receiving a lump sum distribution to purchase an annuity
which would provide such participant with the same net after-tax stream of
annuity benefits that such participant would have realized had he retired as of
the date of the lump sum distribution and commenced to receive annuity payments
at that time under the terms of the applicable Plan, based on salary and
service factors at the time of the effective change in control. With respect to
designated participants who retire prior to an effective change in control and
who receive a basic lump sum distribution under the circumstances described
above, the trust provides for similar lump sum equalization payments, based on
salary and service factors at the time of actual retirement.
RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Mr. Dutt is Chairman of STRATXX Ltd., which provides consulting services to
the Company and its subsidiary and affiliated companies in the field of
strategic resource development and planning. Fees for such services paid to
STRATXX in respect of the fiscal year ended March 31, 1994 were $51,000.
PROPOSED COMPENSATION PLAN
The Board of Directors of the Company has adopted, for fiscal years beginning
after March 31, 1994, the Company's 1994 Variable Supplemental Compensation
Plan (the "1994 Plan") and directed that the 1994 Plan be submitted to
stockholders for their approval at the Annual Meeting. The purpose of the 1994
Plan is to provide a means to compensate managerial and other key employees who
contribute materially to the success of the Company and its subsidiary and
affiliated companies.
In the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Congress enacted 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code, which limits to $1,000,000 per year the tax
deduction available to public companies for certain
22
<PAGE>
compensation paid to covered employees, subject to exceptions for compensation
which is performance based. On December 15, 1993, the Internal Revenue Service
(the "IRS") proposed a set of regulations in connection with 162(m) which
provides guidance on this exception for performance based compensation.
Generally, the performance based compensation exception to the 162(m) deduction
limit is available with respect to compensation (i) which is conditioned upon
and only paid upon satisfaction of the attainment of certain performance
business goals and (ii) that such goals and the maximum amount of compensation,
which may be paid provided such performance goals are attained, are disclosed
to and approved by stockholders.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the
1994 Plan. The 1994 Plan will become effective upon approval by a majority of
the stockholders entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy at the
meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
The 1994 Plan is set forth as Exhibit A hereto, and the following description
is qualified in its entirety by reference thereto.
The 1994 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee, composed of
disinterested outside directors appointed by the Board. All salaried employees
are eligible to participate in the 1994 Plan. The Chief Executive Officer shall
automatically participate in the 1994 Plan. Actual participation in the 1994
Plan by all other salaried employees shall be based upon recommendations by the
Chief Executive Officer, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee will establish, for each Plan year, performance
goals and award opportunities, in writing, which correspond to various levels
of achievement of the preestablished performance goals. The award opportunity
for any Named Executive Officer shall be based on the following performance
criteria: (i) the Named Executive Officer's target incentive award; (ii) the
potential final award in relation to the various levels of achievement of the
preestablished performance goals; and (iii) company, group, or division
performance in relation to the preestablished performance goal. For Plan
participants covered by the new IRS rules referred to above (a"covered
employee"), performance measures which may be used to determine award
opportunities for any covered employee, shall be limited to Cash Flow, Cash
Flow Return on Capital, Cash Flow Return on Equity, Net Income, Return on
Capital, Return on Assets, and Return on Equity, as defined in the 1994 Plan.
The specific performance goals for Plan year 1995 have been established. Once
established, performance goals normally shall not be changed during the Plan
year. However, if the Compensation Committee determines that external changes
or other unanticipated business conditions have materially affected the
fairness of the goals, then the Compensation Committee may approve appropriate
adjustments to the performance goals during the Plan year as such goals apply
to the award opportunities to the extent permitted by 162(m). In addition, the
Compensation Committee shall have the authority to reduce or eliminate final
awards, based upon any criteria it deems appropriate.
At the end of each Plan year, awards shall be computed for each Plan
participant. Final individual awards may vary above or below the target award,
based on the level of achievement of the preestablished performance goal. The
maximum payout with respect to any award payable to any one Plan participant in
23
<PAGE>
any given Plan year shall be nine hundred thousand dollars ($900,000). However,
the Compensation Committee may establish minimum levels of performance goal
achievement, below which no awards will be paid to any Plan participant. The
Committee may amend the 1994 Plan from time to time, as consistent with the
Plan.
The table below shows, for illustrative purposes only, the amounts paid under
the predecessor Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan for the fiscal year
ending March 31, 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DOLLAR
NAME POSITION VALUE
---- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
R. E. Howson................. Chairman & Chief Executive Officer $ 325,264
B. A. Hattox................. Senior VP & Chief Financial Officer 92,008
J. J. Stewart................ President & Chief Operating Officer,
Babcock & Wilcox Company 119,849
J. J. Wildasin............... President & Chief Operating Officer,
McDermott Marine Construction 103,508
Senior VP & Chief Administrative
R. E. Woolbert............... Officer 84,848
All Executive Officers as a
Group....................... 1,919,632
All Employees as a Group
(including Executive
Officers)................... $4,041,000
</TABLE>
APPROVAL OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING MARCH 31, 1995
Upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors has
approved the retention of Ernst & Young, independent public accountants, to
serve as independent auditors to audit the accounts of the Company for the
fiscal year ending March 31, 1995. Although not required to do so, the Board of
Directors considers it advisable that such retention be submitted to the
stockholders for their approval. Ernst & Young served as independent auditors
of the Company and its subsidiaries during the fiscal year ended March 31,
1994. During such fiscal year Ernst & Young performed audit and tax services
for the Company and its subsidiaries for which they have received or will
receive, in the aggregate, approximately $4,400,000 in fees.
Representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the Annual Meeting and
will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to
respond to appropriate questions.
A majority of the voting power of the shares of the outstanding capital stock
of the Company entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy at the
meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof is required to approve this
proposal. Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the enclosed Proxy
intend to vote for approval of the retention of Ernst & Young. If the
stockholders do not approve the proposal to retain Ernst & Young, the Board of
Directors will retain other independent auditors. The Board of Directors
recommends that the stockholders vote "FOR" the retention of Ernst & Young as
independent auditors.
24
<PAGE>
STOCKHOLDERS' PROPOSALS AND OTHER MATTERS
No business other than that set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual
Meeting of Stockholders is expected to come before the meeting, but should any
other matters requiring a vote arise, including a question of adjourning the
meeting, the persons named as proxies in the enclosed Proxy will vote thereon
according to their judgment in the best interests of the Company. All shares
represented by valid Proxies will be voted in accordance with the choice made
by the stockholder with respect to each specific proposal listed thereon. If a
choice is not made with respect to such proposal, the Proxy will be voted for
(i) the election of Directors as described under "Election of Directors," (ii)
the approval and adoption of the 1994 Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan,
and (iii) the appointment of Ernst & Young as independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending March 31, 1995.
Proposals by stockholders intended to be presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting
must be received by the Corporate Secretary of the Company no later than March
9, 1995, in order to be qualified for inclusion in the Company's Proxy
Statement and form of proxy for such meeting. Concurrently therewith,
proponents shall provide the Company in writing with his or her name, address,
the number of shares of Common Stock held of record or beneficially, the date
or dates upon which such Common Stock was acquired and documentary support for
a claim of beneficial ownership.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
LAWRENCE R. PURTELL
Secretary
Dated: July 6, 1994
25
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT A
The 1994 Variable Supplemental
Compensation Plan
Article 1. Purpose
The purpose of the plan is to make provision for the payment of supplemental
compensation to managerial and other key Employees who contribute materially to
the success of the Company or one or more of its Subsidiary or Affiliated
Companies, thereby affording them an incentive for and a means of participating
in that success.
Article 2. Definitions
For the purposes of the Plan, the following definitions shall be applicable:
(a) AFFILIATED COMPANY. Any corporation, joint venture, or other legal
entity in which McDermott International, Inc., directly or indirectly,
through one or more Subsidiaries, owns less than 50 percent but at
least 20 percent of its voting control.
(b) ASSETS. Corporate Assets are defined as "total assets" as reported in
the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Group and division assets are
defined as "total assets" attributable to the group or division
averaged over each of the four quarters in the plan year, excluding
cash, long-term notes payable, interest payable, and interest
receivable.
(c) AWARD OPPORTUNITY. The various levels of incentive award payouts which
a Participant may earn under the Plan, as established by the Committee
pursuant to Sections 6(a) and 6(b) herein.
(d) BOARD. The Board of Directors of McDermott International, Inc.
(e) CAPITAL. With respect to each fiscal year of the Company, the sum of
(i) Notes Payable and Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt
(cumulatively also known as "Short-Term Debt"), (ii) Long-Term Debt,
(iii) Deferred and Noncurrent Income Taxes, (iv) Total Minority
Interest, and (v) Stockholders' Equity, all as reported in or
determined from the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at the end of
such year.
(f) CASH FLOW. With respect to each fiscal year of the Company, Corporate
Cash Flow is defined as the sum of (i) Net Income (ii) Depreciation and
Amortization, (iii) Minority Interest Dividends on Preferred Stock of
Subsidiary, (iv) Interest Expense, all as reported in the Company's
Consolidated Statement of Income and Retained Earnings, and (v) the
difference between Deferred and Noncurrent Income Taxes as at the end
of such fiscal year and the Deferred and
<PAGE>
Noncurrent Income Taxes as at the end of the immediately preceding
fiscal year, as reported in or determined from the Company's
Consolidated Balance Sheet at the end of such year. Group and division
Cash Flow is further adjusted to remove all financing elements
(including, but not limited to, debt and interest income).
(g) CASH FLOW RETURN ON ASSETS. With respect to each fiscal year of the
Company, that fraction, stated as a percentage, the numerator of which
is "Cash Flow" and the denominator of which is "Assets."
(h) CASH FLOW RETURN ON CAPITAL. With respect to each fiscal year of the
Company, that fraction, stated as a percentage, the numerator of which
is "Cash Flow" and the denominator of which is "Capital."
(i) CASH FLOW RETURN ON EQUITY. With respect to each fiscal year of the
Company, that fraction, stated as a percentage, the numerator of which
is "Cash Flow" and the denominator of which is "Equity."
(j) COMMITTEE. "Committee" means the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. The Committee shall be constituted so as to permit the
Program to comply with the exemptive provisions of Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules promulgated thereunder,
and the rules and regulations approved by national securities
exchanges.
(k) COMPANY. "Company" means McDermott International, Inc., a Panamanian
corporation (or any successor thereto) and its subsidiaries and
affiliates.
(l) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND
RETAINED EARNINGS. With respect to each fiscal year of the Company, the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Income and
Retained Earnings, included in the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements for such year, as certified by the Company's independent
public accountants, and set forth in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(m) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. With respect to each fiscal year of
the Company, the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated
Statement of Income and Retained Earnings for such year.
(n) EMPLOYEE. Any person who is regularly employed by the Company or any of
its Subsidiary or Affiliated Companies on a full-time salaried basis,
including any Employee who also is an officer or director of the
Company or of any of its Subsidiary or Affiliated Companies.
(o) EQUITY. Total stockholders' equity as reported in the Company's
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(p) FINAL AWARD. The actual award earned during a plan year by a
Participant, as determined by the Committee following the end of a plan
year.
<PAGE>
(q) NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER. A Participant who, as of the date of a payout
of a Final Award, is one of the group of "covered employees," as
defined in the Regulations promulgated under Section 162(m)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(r) NET INCOME. Corporate Net Income is defined as after-tax net income, as
reported in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Group and
division Net Income is defined as pre-tax net income attributable to a
specific business unit.
(s) PARTICIPANT. An Employee who has received an Award.
(t) PLAN. The Variable Supplemental Compensation Plan of McDermott
International, Inc.
(u) RETIREMENT PLANS. The Retirement Plan for Employees of McDermott
Incorporated, The Babcock & Wilcox Company Employee Retirement Plan,
and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of McDermott
Incorporated.
(v) RETURN ON ASSETS. With respect to each fiscal year of the Company, that
fraction, stated as a percentage, the numerator of which is "Net
Income" and the denominator of which is "Assets."
(w) RETURN ON CAPITAL. With respect to each fiscal year of the Company,
that fraction, stated as a percentage, the numerator of which is "Net
Income" and the denominator of which is "Capital."
(x) RETURN ON EQUITY. With respect to each fiscal year of the Company, that
fraction, stated as a percentage, the numerator of which is "Net
Income" and the denominator of which is "Equity."
(y) SALARY. The annual basic compensation payable (including any portion
which may have been deferred) which was in effect on March 31, the last
day of the fiscal year of the Company.
(z) SUBSIDIARY. Any corporation, joint venture or other legal entity in
which the Company, directly or indirectly, owns more than 50 percent of
its voting control.
(aa) TARGET INCENTIVE AWARD. The award to be paid to Participants when the
Company meets "targeted" performance results, as established by the
Committee.
Article 3. Unfunded Status of the Plan
(a) Each Final Award shall be paid from the general funds of the Company. The
entire expense of administering the Plan shall be borne by McDermott
International, Inc.
(b) No special or separate funds shall be established, or other segregation
of assets made, to execute payment of Final Awards. No Employee, or other
person, shall have, under any circumstances, any interest whatsoever, vested or
contingent, in any particular property or asset of the Company or any
Subsidiary or Affiliated Company by virtue of any Final Award.
<PAGE>
Article 4. Administration of the Plan
Full power and authority to construe, interpret, and administer the Plan
shall be vested in the Committee. A determination by the Committee in carrying
out or administering the Plan shall be final and binding for all purposes and
upon all interested persons, their heirs, and personal representative(s).
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation
(a) All salaried Employees are eligible for participation in the Plan. Actual
participation in the Plan shall be based upon recommendations by the Chief
Executive Officer, subject to approval by the Committee. The Chief Executive
Officer shall automatically participate in the Plan.
(b) An Employee who becomes eligible after the beginning of a plan year may
participate in the Plan for that plan year. Such situations may include, but
are not limited to, (i) new hires, (ii) when an Employee is promoted from a
position which did not meet the eligibility criteria, or (iii) when an Employee
is transferred from an affiliate which does not participate in the Plan. The
Committee, in its sole discretion, retains the right to prohibit or allow
participation in the initial plan year of eligibility for any of the
aforementioned Employees.
Article 6. Award Determination
(a) PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND PERFORMANCE GOALS. For each plan year, the
Committee shall select performance measures and shall establish performance
goals for that plan year. Except as provided in Article 8 herein, the
performance measures may be based on any combination of Corporate, group,
divisional, and/or individual goals.
For each plan year, the Committee shall establish ranges of performance goals
which will correspond to various levels of Award Opportunities. Each
performance goal range shall include a level of performance at which one
hundred percent (100%) of the Target Incentive Award shall be earned. In
addition, each range shall include levels of performance above and below the
one hundred percent (100%) performance level.
After the performance goals are established, the Committee will align the
achievement of the performance goals with the Award Opportunities (as described
in Article 6(b) herein), such that the level of achievement of the
preestablished performance goals at the end of the plan year will determine the
Final Awards. Except as provided in Article 8 herein, the Committee shall have
the authority to exercise subjective discretion in the determination of Final
Awards, and the authority to delegate the ability to exercise subjective
discretion in this respect.
The Committee may establish one or more Company-wide performance measures
which must be achieved for any Participant to receive a Final Award payment for
that plan year.
<PAGE>
(b) AWARD OPPORTUNITIES. For each plan year, the Committee shall establish,
in writing, Award Opportunities which correspond to various levels of
achievement of the preestablished performance goals. The established Award
Opportunities shall vary in relation to the job classification of each
Participant.
(c) ADJUSTMENT OF PERFORMANCE GOALS AND AWARD OPPORTUNITIES. Once
established, performance goals normally shall not be changed during the plan
year. However, except as provided in Article 8 herein, if the Committee
determines that external changes or other unanticipated business conditions
have materially affected the fairness of the goals, then the Committee may
approve appropriate adjustments to the performance goals (either up or down)
during the plan year as such goals apply to the Award Opportunities of
specified Participants. In addition, the Committee shall have the authority to
reduce or eliminate the Final Award determinations, based upon any objective or
subjective criteria it deems appropriate.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, in the event of any change
in Corporate capitalization, such as a stock split, or a Corporate transaction,
such as any merger, consolidation, separation, including a spin-off, or other
distribution of stock or property of the Company, any reorganization (whether
or not such reorganization comes within the definition of such term in Code
Section 368), or any partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such
adjustment shall be made in the Award Opportunities and/or the performance
measures or performance goals related to then-current performance periods, as
may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee, in its sole
discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights; provided, however,
that subject to Article 8 herein, any such adjustment shall not be made if it
would eliminate the ability of Award Opportunities held by Named Executive
Officers to qualify for the "performance-based" exception under Code Section
162(m).
(d) FINAL AWARD DETERMINATIONS. At the end of each plan year, Final Awards
shall be computed for each Participant as determined by the Committee. Subject
to the terms of Article 8 herein, Final Award amounts may vary above or below
the Target Incentive Award, based on the level of achievement of the
preestablished Corporate, group, divisional, and/or individual performance
goals.
(e) AWARD LIMIT. The Committee may establish guidelines governing the maximum
Final Awards that may be earned by Participants (either in the aggregate, by
Employee class, or among individual Participants) in each plan year. The
guidelines may be expressed as a percentage of Company-wide goals or financial
measures, or such other measures as the Committee shall from time to time
determine; provided, however, that the maximum payout with respect to a Final
Award payable to any one Participant in connection with performance in any one
plan year shall be nine hundred thousand dollars ($900,000).
(f) THRESHOLD LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE. The Committee may establish minimum
levels of performance goal achievement, below which no payouts of Final Awards
shall be made to any Participant.
<PAGE>
Article 7. Payment of Awards
Each and every Final Award shall be payable in a lump sum within thirty (30)
days of the Committee's determination; provided, however, at the election of an
Employee made in writing to the Committee not later than the end of a calendar
year, an Employee may irrevocably elect to defer receipt of payment, subject to
the conditions hereinafter set forth, of all or any portion of a Final Award
until a date, as selected by such employee, on or up to fifteen (15) years
after such Employee's retirement under any of the Retirement Plans (or, if not
a participant in any of the Retirement Plans, under any Subsidiary or
Affiliated Companies), but, in no event, later than such employee's termination
of employment other than by reason of such retirement. Payment of any portion
of a Final Award so deferred shall be made in a lump sum on such deferred
payment date, or as soon after such employee's earlier termination of
employment, other than by reason of retirement, as shall be practicable.
Amounts deferred shall earn interest until paid, compounded daily, at a rate
determined by the Committee periodically from the date the Final Award is
determined. In the event of the death of a Participant, either before or after
retirement, all amounts deferred hereunder, plus interest thereon as provided
above, shall be paid to the legal representative(s) of such Participant's
estate in a lump sum within thirty (30) days of the Committee's receiving
notice satisfactory to it of the judicial recognition or appointment of said
representative(s).
Article 8. Named Executive Officers
(a) APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 8. The provisions of this Article 8 shall apply
only to Named Executive Officers. In the event of any inconsistencies between
this Article 8 and the other Plan provisions as they pertain to Named Executive
Officers, the provisions of this Article 8 shall control.
(b) ESTABLISHMENT OF AWARD OPPORTUNITIES. Except as provided in Article 8(g)
herein, Award Opportunities for Named Executive Officers shall be established
as a function of each Named Executive Officer's base Salary. For each plan
year, the Committee shall establish, in writing, various levels of Final Awards
which will be paid with respect to specified levels of attainment of the
preestablished performance goals.
(c) COMPONENTS OF AWARD OPPORTUNITIES. Each Named Executive Officer's Award
Opportunity shall be based on: (a) the Named Executive Officer's Target
Incentive Award; (b) the potential Final Awards corresponding to various levels
of achievement of the preestablished performance goals, as established by the
Committee; and (c) Company, group, or division performance in relation to the
preestablished performance goals. Except as provided in Article 8(g) herein,
performance measures which may serve as determinants of Named Executive
Officers' Award Opportunities shall be limited to Cash Flow, Cash Flow Return
on Capital, Cash Flow Return on Assets, Cash Flow Return on Equity, Net Income,
Return on Capital, Return on Assets, and Return on Equity. Definitions for each
of these performance measures has been set forth in Article 2. However, the
resulting performance, determined by compliance with the applicable
definition(s) shall, to the extent not inconsistent with Section 162(m), be
adjusted to exclude any negative impact caused by changes in accounting
principles and unusual, nonrecurring events and
<PAGE>
extraordinary items (including, but not limited to, write-offs, capital gains
and losses, acquisitions or dispositions of businesses). The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors shall have the right through discretionary
downward adjustments to exclude the positive impact of the aforementioned items
and occurrences.
(d) NO MID-YEAR CHANGE IN AWARD OPPORTUNITIES. Except as provided in Article
8(c) and (g) herein, each Named Executive Officer's Final Award shall be based
exclusively on the Award Opportunity levels established by the Committee.
(e) NONADJUSTMENT OF PERFORMANCE GOALS. Except as provided in Article 8(c)
and (g) herein, performance goals shall not be changed following their
establishment, and Named Executive Officers shall not receive any payout when
the minimum performance goals are not met or exceeded.
(f) INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND DISCRETIONARY ADJUSTMENTS. Except as provided
in Article 8(g) herein, subjective evaluations of individual performance of
Named Executive Officers shall not be reflected in their Final Awards. However,
the Committee shall have the discretion to decrease or eliminate the amount of
the Final Award otherwise payable to a Named Executive Officer.
(g) PERMISSABLE MODIFICATIONS. If, on the advice of the Company's tax
counsel, the Committee determines that Code Section 162(m) and the Regulations
thereunder will not adversely affect the deductibility for federal income tax
purposes of any amount paid under the Plan by permitting greater discretion
and/or flexibility with respect to Award Opportunities granted to Named
Executive Officers pursuant to this Article 8, then the Committee may, in its
sole discretion, apply such greater discretion and/or flexibility to such Award
Opportunities as is consistent with the terms of this Plan, and without regard
to the restrictive provisions of this Article 8.
Article 9. Limitations
(a) No person shall at any time have any right to a payment hereunder for any
fiscal year, and no person shall have authority to enter into an agreement for
the making of an Award Opportunity or payment of a Final Award or to make any
representation or guarantee with respect thereto.
(b) An employee receiving an Award Opportunity shall have no rights in
respect of such Award Opportunity, except the right to receive payments,
subject to the conditions herein, of such Award Opportunity, which right may
not be assigned or transferred except by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution.
(c) Neither the action of the Company in establishing the Plan, nor any
action taken by the Committee under the Plan, nor any provision of the Plan
shall be construed as giving to any person the right to be retained in the
employ of the Company or any of its Subsidiary or Affiliated Companies.
<PAGE>
Article 10. Amendment, Suspension, Termination, or Alteration of the Plan
The Board may, at any time or from time to time, amend, suspend, terminate or
alter the Plan, in whole or in part, but it may not thereby affect adversely
rights of Participants, their spouses, children, and personal representative(s)
with respect to Final Awards previously made.
Article 11. Commencement of Awards
The Company's fiscal year ending March 31, 1995 shall be the first fiscal
year with respect to which Awards may be made under the Plan.
<PAGE>
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Solicited by the Board of Directors
P
The undersigned stockholder(s) of McDermott International, Inc. a Panama
R corporation, hereby appoint Brock A. Hattox, Lawrence R. Purtell and R. E.
Woolbert and each of them, attorneys, agents and proxies of the undersigned,
O with full power of substitution to each of them to vote all the shares of
Common Stock which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual
X Meeting of Stockholders of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31,
1994 to be held in the La Salle Ballroom of the Hotel Inter-Continental, 444
Y St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana, on Tuesday, August 9, 1994, at
9:30 a.m. local time and at any adjournment(s) of such meeting, with all
powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Annual Report for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1994 and the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and Proxy Statement of the Company for the above-mentioned Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Every properly signed Proxy will be voted in accordance with the
specifications made thereon. IF NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE
VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND IN THE MANNER FAVORED BY THE
DIRECTORS AS INDICATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.
Election of Directors:
Nominees: James L. Dutt, Robert E. Howson, James A. Hunt and John N. Turner.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN AND DATE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD AND PROMPTLY
RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
X Please mark your
votes as in this
example.
IMPORTANT-PLEASE MARK APPROPRIATE BOXES ONLY IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN:
1. Election of FOR WITHHELD
Directors
(See Reverse)
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
___________________________
2. To approve and adopt the 1994 Variable Supplemental FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Compensation Plan, as described in the Proxy Statement
(the Directors favor a vote "FOR"):
3. To approve the retention of Ernst & Young as FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 1995 (the Directors favor a vote "FOR"):
4. Upon such other matters as may properly come before
the meeting.
(Signature(s) should agree with name(s) on
stock certificates as specified hereon.
Executors, administrators, trustees, etc.,
should indicate when signing).
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
SIGNATURE(S) DATE
- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
