|
Previous: ALLIANCE MUNICIPAL TRUST, NSAR-A/A, 2000-03-02 |
Next: COUNTRYWIDE STRATEGIC TRUST, 485APOS, 2000-03-02 |
1999 Annual Report
THE |
ROYCE PREMIER FUND
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL FUND
ROYCE SELECT FUND
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND
ROYCE TOTAL RETURN FUND
ROYCE LOW-PRICED STOCK FUND
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND
www.roycefunds.com
THE ROYCE FUNDS ROAD MAP
For more than 25 years, Royce & Associates has utilized
a disciplined value approach to invest in small-cap companies.
We believe that the small-cap universe is comprised of two distinct markets,
small- and micro-cap, and
that each requires a distinct investment strategy.
MICRO-CAP
The micro-cap segment (companies with market caps less than $300 million) provides many choices (more than 6,100 companies), yet faces significant trading difficulties, including limited trading volumes and high volatility. Therefore, we broadly diversify most of the Funds' portfolios investing in this segment by holding relatively smaller positions in most securities.
SMALL-CAP
The upper tier of the small-cap universe (companies with market caps between $300 million and $1.5 billion) is more efficient, offering greater trading volume and narrower bid/ask spreads. Therefore, we use a more concentrated approach in this tier, holding larger positions in a relatively limited number of securities.
PORTFOLIO
APPROACH
|
||
Concentrated |
Broadly Diversified |
|
|
||
Small-Cap Companies |
Royce Premier Fund |
|
|
||
Small- and Micro-Cap |
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund |
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund |
|
||
Micro-Cap Companies |
Royce Micro-Cap Fund |
CONCENTRATED FUNDS
Royce Premier Fund - a portfolio whose top 35 holdings, selected almost exclusively from the upper tier of small-cap, represent approximately 80% of the portfolio's equities.
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund - a small- and micro-cap portfolio for gifting and estate-planning that allows a donor to combine the advantages of a trust with the benefits of a mutual fund.
Royce Select Fund - a small- and micro-cap portfolio for qualified investors that incorporates an all-inclusive performance management fee.
BROADLY DIVERSIFIED FUNDS
Royce Micro-Cap Fund - a portfolio that selects companies with market capitalizations below $300 million that meet its pricing and valuation parameters.
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund - our flagship fund managed by Chuck Royce since 1973 that invests in small- and micro-cap companies.
Royce Total Return Fund - a small- and micro-cap portfolio that invests in dividend-paying companies.
Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund - a portfolio that invests primarily in small- and micro-cap companies trading at less than $15 per share at the time of purchase.
Royce Opportunity Fund - a small- and micro-cap portfolio incorporating an opportunistic value approach, managed by Buzz Zaino.
THE
ROYCE FUNDS
|
ANNUAL REPORT REFERENCE GUIDE
For more than 25 years, our approach has focused on evaluating a company's current worth what we believe a business would sell for in a private transaction between rational and well-informed parties. This requires a thorough analysis of the financial and operating dynamics of a business, as though we were purchasing the entire company. The price that we pay for a security must be substantially lower than our appraisal of its current worth.
[GRAPHIC: Looking through magnifying glass at The Royce Funds listing in newspaper]
Letter to Our Shareholders:
Better Late Than Never: Small-Caps Join the Party
Performance and Portfolio Review: Royce Premier
Fund, Royce Micro-Cap Fund,
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund, Royce Select Fund, Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund,
Royce Total Return Fund, Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund and Royce Opportunity Fund
Q & A Session with Chuck Royce, Whitney George and Jack Fockler
Updates and Notes: What's New at www.roycefunds.com and elsewhere at the firm
Schedules of Investments and Other Financial Statements
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS Through December 31, 1999 |
|||||||||
FUND |
1-YEAR |
3-YEAR |
5-YEAR |
FROM |
INCEPTION
|
||||
|
|||||||||
Royce Premier Fund |
11.5 |
% |
12.1 |
% |
14.4 |
% |
13.7 |
% |
12/31/91 |
|
|||||||||
Royce Micro-Cap Fund* |
13.7 |
11.1 |
13.5 |
15.3 |
12/31/91 |
||||
|
|||||||||
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund* |
6.0 |
11.3 |
13.1 |
15.6 |
6/30/73 |
||||
|
|||||||||
Royce Select Fund |
35.4 |
n/a |
n/a |
40.3 |
11/18/98 |
||||
|
|||||||||
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund* |
41.8 |
28.8 |
n/a |
27.9 |
12/27/95 |
||||
|
|||||||||
Royce Total Return Fund |
1.6 |
9.6 |
15.9 |
13.9 |
12/15/93 |
||||
|
|||||||||
Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund |
29.8 |
16.7 |
19.0 |
16.1 |
12/15/93 |
||||
|
|||||||||
Royce Opportunity Fund |
32.3 |
18.8 |
n/a |
20.0 |
11/19/96 |
||||
|
|||||||||
Russell 2000 |
21.3 |
13.1 |
16.7 |
||||||
|
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund's 10-year average annual total return for the period ended 12/31/99 was 10.7%.
*Investment Class
LETTER TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS
[PHOTO]
Charles M. Royce, President
Over the last 20 years, falling interest rates have been the engine driving the stock market's record-breaking run, but the ride may soon slow down. As of December 31, 1999, the annual coupon yield on the long-term Treasury bond had declined 57% from its 1981 high of 15.2% to the current 6.5%. Short-term yields declined 70% from an annual rate high of 17.7% in 1981 to 5.3% currently. In order to match the magnitude of this drop, long-term rates would have to decline below 2.8% and short-term rates would have to fall below 1.6% a possible, but unlikely scenario. Without this powerful backdrop, we think that the longevity of high stock market returns is questionable.
[GRAPHIC: The Royce Funds portfolio managers celebrating in Times Square]
Watching for Value at the Dot.Com Party
BETTER LATE THAN NEVER: SMALL-CAPS JOIN THE PARTY
It was only fitting that the stock market concluded the year with a fireworks display that would have made the pyrotechnists at the Eiffel Tower envious. The technology-laden Nasdaq Composite exploded with an 85.6% gain for 1999, the best single-year performance ever by a diversified domestic equity index. For an unprecedented fifth consecutive year, large-cap indices, the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average, concluded 1999 with strong double-digit gains. Small-cap companies managed a fourth-quarter flurry of their own that enabled the Russell 2000 (+21.3%) to edge out the S&P 500 (+21.1%) in 1999 for the first time since 1993, news that risks being lost in the wake of the Nasdaq Composite's record-shattering year.
If all of this were not enough to convince you that the stock market succumbed to millennium madness, consider that, according to Lipper, Inc., the average technology fund rose 134.8% in 1999. Contributing to this unheard of ascent was a torrid IPO (initial public offering) market that produced first-day gains of 100% or more for 101 companies.
2 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
If this were to continue, IPO would need to be relabeled "instant profit opportunity." To put 1999 into perspective, over the prior 207 years, or since investors began gathering at Wall Street's buttonwood tree in 1792, there had only been 42 IPOs with first-day gains of more than 100% (Source: The Wall Street Journal).
We can perhaps be indulged in a bit of hyperbole in saying that small-cap stocks, like the heroic warriors in Braveheart, refused to surrender to their large-cap counterparts. After five long years of underperformance, the Russell 2000 eked out its small edge versus the S&P 500 with better performance in the second and fourth quarters after a complete disconnect in the first quarter. Not on most investors' radar screens is the fact that 1999's calendar year results also reflected excellent small-cap performance from both the 10/8/98 Russell 2000 market trough (Russell 2000 +65.2% versus S&P 500 +55.6%) and the 1999 Russell 2000 low on 3/23/99 (Russell 2000 +33.1% versus S&P 500 +17.5%). Another little noticed, but compelling statistic is that, for the first time ever, the dividend yield of the Russell 2000 is greater than that of the S&P 500 and was so for all of 1999. Do we think that this is the start of something good for our asset class? "You betcha."
Growth handily trounced value in all capitalization classes. In 1999, the year was like the old country music song, in which growth investors got the goldmine and value investors got the shaft. |
NEVER SURRENDER
Technology's dominance extended across all capitalization categories. The sector now accounts for approximately 29% of the stocks in the S&P 500. In 1999, 66% of the S&P 500's return was attributable to just 10 stocks, eight of which were technology issues. Approximately 93% of the Russell 2000's gain for the year resulted from stocks in the technology sector, and it is now the largest sector in the Russell 2000, up from third at the beginning of 1999. In spite of these impressive statistics, technology's impact was perhaps nowhere more evident than in the divergence between the growth and value investment styles. In all capitalization classes, growth stocks, typically those with high price/earnings and price/book ratios and high earnings growth rates, handily trounced value stocks, typically those with low P/E and P/B ratios and cyclical growth rates. In 1999, the year was like the old country music song, in which growth investors got the goldmine and value investors got the shaft.
3 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
We looked at historical Russell 2000, Russell 2000 Value and Russell 2000 Growth index full market cycle returns to see if growth stocks had generally outperformed in up markets and value stocks in down markets over the last two decades. A full market cycle incorporates at least one up and one down phase and requires a move of at least 15% from the previous peak or trough.
Small-cap value outper-formed growth during five out of six down market periods. Surprisingly, value also outperformed growth in four out of six up market periods. So despite strong recent performance by growth stocks on the verge of winning their first full-market cycle out of six full market cycle periods throughout the small-cap index's history (since 1979) we believe that the long-term case for value remains compelling.
1999 SMALL-CAP VS. LARGE-CAP RESULTS BY QUARTER |
||||
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
4th Qtr |
|
Russell 2000 |
-5.4% |
15.6% |
-6.3% |
18.4% |
S&P 500 |
5.0% |
7.1% |
-6.3% |
14.9% |
The divergence between growth and value in the small-cap sector was especially prominent. There was also substantial disparity within small-cap value. While performance spreads were consistent between growth and value in the Russell and the Wilshire small-cap style indicesgrowth outdistanced value1999 returns in the value category were markedly different for each index. The Russell 2000 Value index lost 1.5% in 1999, yet the Wilshire Small-Cap Value index's return was even more miserable, down 15.6%. Since the Wilshire Small-Cap Value Index is made up of arguably higher-quality constituents than the Russell 2000 Value, as measured by lower debt-to-capital and higher return-on-assets and return-on-equity ratios, the travails suffered by small-cap value investors in 1999 are readily evident (Source: Prudential Securities).
Our most risk-averse portfolios (Pennsylvania Mutual Fund and Royce Total Return Fund) were underperformers, while our relatively more aggressive portfolios (Royce Select Fund, Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund, Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund and Royce Opportunity Fund) excelled in both an absolute and relative sense. |
EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED
1999 was as confounding and at times difficult a year as we have seen for our
investment universe and our style, with some Royce portfolios turning in excellent
performances while others languished. Our most risk-averse portfolios (Pennsylvania
Mutual Fund and Royce Total Return Fund) were
4 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
underperformers, while our relatively
more aggressive portfolios (Royce Select Fund, Royce Trust & GiftShares
Fund, Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund and Royce Opportunity Fund) excelled in both
an absolute and relative sense. After performing atypically in 1999's first half (all but one Royce Fund portfolio
underperformed the Russell 2000 during the first quarter downturn, and all but
one portfolio outperformed the Russell 2000 during the dynamic second quarter),
our Funds returned to their more historically normal performance patterns in
the second half. During the difficult third quarter, in which the Russell 2000
and S&P 500 were each down 6.3%, all Royce Fund portfolios outperformed
the indices. The Russell 2000 soared in the potent fourth quarter, up 18.4%,
with only two Royce Fund portfolios (Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund and Royce
Low-Priced Stock Fund) keeping pace.
1999 RESULTS FOR THE ROYCE FUNDS VS. RUSSELL 2000 |
||||||||
RSF |
RTG |
RLP |
ROF |
Russell 2000 |
RPR |
RMC |
PMF |
RTR |
35.4% |
41.8% |
29.8% |
32.3% |
21.3% |
11.5% |
13.7% |
6.0% |
1.6% |
Two of our concentrated portfolios (Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund and Royce Select Fund) and two of our broadly diversified portfolios (Royce Opportunity Fund and Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund) outperformed the Russell 2000 in 1999. However, the relative weighting of technology stocks seemed to be a primary factor in performance, as was the level of relative volatility. For a complete review and discussion of individual fund results and risk profiles, see pages 10 - 25.
5 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
It comes as no surprise that technology, representing an average 15% of the index for the year, was the Russell 2000's best performing sector in 1999, surging 101%. Less well-known is the fact that the Utilities sector (7% of the index) was up more than 40%. Offsetting these strong performances was the poor return of the highest weighted sector in the index, Financial Services (22% of the index), which was down almost 6% for the year.
Among small-caps, performance was skewed across the P/E range in 1999. The best performance was turned in by the companies with no earnings, up more than 85%, while the quintile with the lowest P/E ratios (median P/E of 7.5x) had the worst performance, down more than 10%.
[GRAPHIC: The Royce Funds portfolio managers conducting research.]
Investors in a Speculators' Market
NEW MILLENNIUM CONJECTURE
Like most people, we have spent some time reflecting on what the future might bring. Perhaps it is an occupational hazard, but looking forward always involves some looking backward for us as well. Investors in general seem comfortable taking more risk in order to achieve higher returns. Within the small-cap universe in 1999, the market appeared to us to undervalue good financial characteristics and to overvalue hopes, dreams and potential earnings growth. As a result, many "higher-quality" small-cap stocks are still waiting for their chance to shine. We have many portfolio companies that are very attractive to us from an earnings and balance sheet standpoint, yet their stocks performed worse in 1999 than most momentum- driven stocks that are highly leveraged and that have no earnings history. "Go figure."
6 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
Building long-term wealth is not simply a byproduct of a favorable market. It is produced by applying a consistent discipline over time, and recognizing that in order to provide excellent long-term, absolute and relative results, our portfolios are likely to underperform over some short-term periods. |
What does it all mean for the future? Consider that, aside from technology, most stocks had an unspectacular year. Technology certainly led the market in terms of performance, but other sectors were generally unable to follow its lead. We think that this very narrow market environment could be followed by a return to "quality," a period where market performance will be driven less by momentum and more by business characteristics. While we recognize that technology is a very important factor in our economy, this offers no assurance that it must inevitably remain a market leader.
[PHOTO]
(l-r) Jack Fockler, Whitney George, Chuck Royce,
Charlie Dreifus, Buzz Zaino
As we evaluate 1999's performance and consider what 2000 may hold, it occurs to us that the traditional distinction between the terms "speculator" and "investor" is more relevant than ever. Speculators ("traders") are only concerned about a short-term change in price, whereas investors, ourselves included, are concerned about the long-term appreciation potential of an enterprise.
We think that the current environment of record-setting stock market returns is unlikely to continue. For the speculator, this is bad news; for the long-term investor, it is of less concern. Building long-term wealth is not simply a byproduct of a favorable market. It is produced by applying a consistent discipline over time, and recognizing that in order to provide excellent long-term, absolute and relative results, our portfolios are likely to underperform over some short-term periods.
In this period of extreme divergence between growth and value, we have no interest in exchanging our investment charter for that of the speculator. Current conditions seem ripe to us for a return to value, with the accompanying prospect of higher short-term returns for this style. Whatever the outcome in the near term, we believe that the individual companies in the Funds' portfolios offer substantial long-term performance opportunity.
Sincerely,
/s/ Charles M. RoyceCharles M. Royce
President
/s/ W. Whitney George
W. Whitney George
Vice President
/s/ Jack E. Fockler, Jr.
Jack E. Fockler, Jr.
Vice President
January 31, 2000
PS We invite you to visit our Website at www.roycefunds.com for up-to-date information on our Funds and our company. Your questions and comments are welcome.
7 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
ROYCE FUNDS VS. RUSSELL 2000
Performance measurement refers to the idea of comparing returns against a benchmark exactly which benchmark and over what time periods are always the questions.
Although a number of style indices within the small-cap sector are now available, each incorporates different, in some cases substantially different, definitions of value. Since we select securities from the entire small-cap universe, not just the "value" portion of the sector, we believe that the broadly defined Russell 2000 is a better index with which to compare our investment results.
Traditional performance presentations revolve around fixed time periods (e.g., one- three- and five-year returns), rather than around market cycles, even though this method may not reveal the complete picture. In contrast, we believe that peak-to-peak, or full-market-cycle, analyses capture performance more completely because they include both up and down phases.
1996 - 1998 MARKET CYCLE RUSSELL 2000 |
|
12/31/95 |
1159.603 |
1162.624 |
|
1156.601 |
|
1140.408 |
|
1145.57 |
|
1145.449 |
|
1128.029 |
|
1111.876 |
|
1122.127 |
|
1120.153 |
|
1109.049 |
|
1107.92 |
|
1111.2 |
|
1116.188 |
|
1121.004 |
|
1128.004 |
|
1132.207 |
|
1139.877 |
|
1140.219 |
|
1142.593 |
|
1144.833 |
|
1150.935 |
|
1158.356 |
|
1165.696 |
|
1166.74 |
|
1169.7 |
|
1175.875 |
|
1173.69 |
|
1177.422 |
|
1180.124 |
|
1181.014 |
|
1175.809 |
|
1180.501 |
|
1179.413 |
|
1182.585 |
|
1172.482 |
|
1181.421 |
|
1195.307 |
|
1197.452 |
|
1195.876 |
|
1194.262 |
|
1195.828 |
|
1194.461 |
|
1191.851 |
|
1197.271 |
|
1202.014 |
|
1203.07 |
|
1204.361 |
|
1174.153 |
|
1184.779 |
|
1180.914 |
|
1190.357 |
|
1196.744 |
|
1196.662 |
|
1209.752 |
|
1210.76 |
|
1208.858 |
|
1210.754 |
|
1212.805 |
|
1206.464 |
|
1206.78 |
|
1210.164 |
|
1211.253 |
|
1218.774 |
|
1224.379 |
|
1227.424 |
|
1230.311 |
|
1233.121 |
|
1218.106 |
|
1224.703 |
|
1219.525 |
|
1214.059 |
|
1220.085 |
|
1228.701 |
|
1236.151 |
|
1233.843 |
|
1243.392 |
|
1247.458 |
|
1256.49 |
|
1265.592 |
|
1270.01 |
|
1275.966 |
|
1281.811 |
|
1283.638 |
|
1283.944 |
|
1291.24 |
|
1275.418 |
|
1278.645 |
|
1278.681 |
|
1274.141 |
|
1272.759 |
|
1281.629 |
|
1294.307 |
|
1306.699 |
|
1317.843 |
|
1320.232 |
|
1323.09 |
|
1329.682 |
|
1338.687 |
|
1338.138 |
|
1343.717 |
|
1343.203 |
|
1344.142 |
|
1333.428 |
|
1324.395 |
|
1329.072 |
|
1334.541 |
|
1332.674 |
|
1337.293 |
|
1340.949 |
|
1332.179 |
|
1323.251 |
|
1326.645 |
|
1325.662 |
|
1327.02 |
|
1318.861 |
|
1310.634 |
|
1306.081 |
|
1288.526 |
|
1281.818 |
|
1270.708 |
|
1274.661 |
|
1280.527 |
|
1272.021 |
|
1255.482 |
|
1263.249 |
|
1279.74 |
|
1283.506 |
|
1280.712 |
|
1272.785 |
|
1253.82 |
|
1243.206 |
|
1242.374 |
|
1228.879 |
|
1199.197 |
|
1195.733 |
|
1162.891 |
|
1145.612 |
|
1175.349 |
|
1193.101 |
|
1187.889 |
|
1173.641 |
|
1151.78 |
|
1136.955 |
|
1151.249 |
|
1162.099 |
|
1156.949 |
|
1158.847 |
|
1167.963 |
|
1180.945 |
|
1199.24 |
|
1200.64 |
|
1202.477 |
|
1211.201 |
|
1210.988 |
|
1210.656 |
|
1210.408 |
|
1204.363 |
|
1208.478 |
|
1212.143 |
|
1216.9 |
|
1218.588 |
|
1218.045 |
|
1217.235 |
|
1226.193 |
|
1227.572 |
|
1226.505 |
|
1234.903 |
|
1241.89 |
|
1238.14 |
|
1235.775 |
|
1233.726 |
|
1238.201 |
|
1227.45 |
|
1236.445 |
|
1242.231 |
|
1244.62 |
|
1246.654 |
|
1252.502 |
|
1262.163 |
|
1268.005 |
|
1267.576 |
|
1265.602 |
|
1264.635 |
|
1270.137 |
|
1265.371 |
|
1269.455 |
|
1273.365 |
|
1278.39 |
|
1280.535 |
|
1284.068 |
|
1280.169 |
|
1290.871 |
|
1287.316 |
|
1294.828 |
|
1293.253 |
|
1287.775 |
|
1283.46 |
|
1285.327 |
|
1290.117 |
|
1294.147 |
|
1294.497 |
|
1292.058 |
|
1291.638 |
|
1290.176 |
|
1283.92 |
|
1271.802 |
|
1271.999 |
|
1272.705 |
|
1272.518 |
|
1261.94 |
|
1254.658 |
|
1255.467 |
|
1264.278 |
|
1261.543 |
|
1262.015 |
|
1261.884 |
|
1271.902 |
|
1278.692 |
|
1279.884 |
|
1284.154 |
|
1285.712 |
|
1286.063 |
|
1290.386 |
|
1287.912 |
|
1285.733 |
|
1289.47 |
|
1291.806 |
|
1290.403 |
|
1300.884 |
|
1309.614 |
|
1306.495 |
|
1311.2 |
|
1316.372 |
|
1321.197 |
|
1330.573 |
|
1331.896 |
|
1335.526 |
|
1321.988 |
|
1340.7 |
|
1343.934 |
|
1330.835 |
|
1326.239 |
|
1318.032 |
|
1304.437 |
|
1303.2 |
|
1314.263 |
|
1325.795 |
|
1327.964 |
|
1323.308 |
|
1324.886 |
|
1331.869 |
|
1337.836 |
|
1341.042 |
|
12/31/96 |
1350.871 |
1337.442 |
|
1348.111 |
|
1349.883 |
|
1356.8 |
|
1357.012 |
|
1362.574 |
|
1364.306 |
|
1363.642 |
|
1369.936 |
|
1368.836 |
|
1368.095 |
|
1371.507 |
|
1376.957 |
|
1380.566 |
|
1381.867 |
|
1381.144 |
|
1372.291 |
|
1362.738 |
|
1366.281 |
|
1365.69 |
|
1373.533 |
|
1377.868 |
|
1378.765 |
|
1373.598 |
|
1363.249 |
|
1363.427 |
|
1367.937 |
|
1358.475 |
|
1353.502 |
|
1363.713 |
|
1374.126 |
|
1377.721 |
|
1381.114 |
|
1381.762 |
|
1372.072 |
|
1367.505 |
|
1367.717 |
|
1369.151 |
|
1358.576 |
|
1348.471 |
|
1344.459 |
|
1346.299 |
|
1351.537 |
|
1359.218 |
|
1358.945 |
|
1364.95 |
|
1371.038 |
|
1373.96 |
|
1361.544 |
|
1345.548 |
|
1349.089 |
|
1335.574 |
|
1326.616 |
|
1314.823 |
|
1316.807 |
|
1314.623 |
|
1306.176 |
|
1310.642 |
|
1317.212 |
|
1304.63 |
|
1281.019 |
|
1275.068 |
|
1263.703 |
|
1258.489 |
|
1275.08 |
|
1290.07 |
|
1293.949 |
|
1297.13 |
|
1291.183 |
|
1269.493 |
|
1267.2 |
|
1275.271 |
|
1273.443 |
|
1274.298 |
|
1279.171 |
|
1266.242 |
|
1265.575 |
|
1266.753 |
|
1266.985 |
|
1257.387 |
|
1258.496 |
|
1275.336 |
|
1284.59 |
|
1294.651 |
|
1325.735 |
|
1357.262 |
|
1354.682 |
|
1349.214 |
|
1348.739 |
|
1353.729 |
|
1362.497 |
|
1361.983 |
|
1365.771 |
|
1371.168 |
|
1369.053 |
|
1373.639 |
|
1379.73 |
|
1386.797 |
|
1392.128 |
|
1408.029 |
|
1412.027 |
|
1416.23 |
|
1418.683 |
|
1427.5 |
|
1437.833 |
|
1436.92 |
|
1434.827 |
|
1443.325 |
|
1451.511 |
|
1454.396 |
|
1452.422 |
|
1453.936 |
|
1461.433 |
|
1470.992 |
|
1471.57 |
|
1472.606 |
|
1472.739 |
|
1487.734 |
|
1477.176 |
|
1466.736 |
|
1476.186 |
|
1468.458 |
|
1465.398 |
|
1474.076 |
|
1488.676 |
|
1480.111 |
|
1481.944 |
|
1487.432 |
|
1487.589 |
|
1495.021 |
|
1491.934 |
|
1498.879 |
|
1510.508 |
|
1516.568 |
|
1526.035 |
|
1540.968 |
|
1533.34 |
|
1524.978 |
|
1516.09 |
|
1526.074 |
|
1531.531 |
|
1533.631 |
|
1535.139 |
|
1535.6 |
|
1540.135 |
|
1553.818 |
|
1557.948 |
|
1556.93 |
|
1562.434 |
|
1572.399 |
|
1581.395 |
|
1579.305 |
|
1557.031 |
|
1551.361 |
|
1546.984 |
|
1548.264 |
|
1549.197 |
|
1536.917 |
|
1537.317 |
|
1556.6 |
|
1576.105 |
|
1568.427 |
|
1563.781 |
|
1572.506 |
|
1573.457 |
|
1583.25 |
|
1586.463 |
|
1593.595 |
|
1610.864 |
|
1613.644 |
|
1616.899 |
|
1629.532 |
|
1640.77 |
|
1647.379 |
|
1644.381 |
|
1641.087 |
|
1657.039 |
|
1657.422 |
|
1676.58 |
|
1680.282 |
|
1681.708 |
|
1684.324 |
|
1691.271 |
|
1693.078 |
|
1689.788 |
|
1687.285 |
|
1691.458 |
|
1700.297 |
|
1710.237 |
|
1713.145 |
|
1721.595 |
|
1731.706 |
|
1739.655 |
|
1747.309 |
|
1747.066 |
|
1750.424 |
|
1752.335 |
|
1752.991 |
|
1748.446 |
|
1744.85 |
|
1724.248 |
|
1694.428 |
|
1711.662 |
|
1730.867 |
|
1728.651 |
|
1695.065 |
|
1688.659 |
|
1585.402 |
|
1621.245 |
|
1640.59 |
|
1617.468 |
|
1635.109 |
|
1664.007 |
|
1668.803 |
|
1678.415 |
|
1671.26 |
|
1642.61 |
|
1643.37 |
|
1636.002 |
|
1598.892 |
|
1598.725 |
|
1617.61 |
|
1644.834 |
|
1631.855 |
|
1626.687 |
|
1645.486 |
|
1642.988 |
|
1616.311 |
|
1612.9 |
|
1617.841 |
|
1624.533 |
|
1640.433 |
|
1634.025 |
|
1639.133 |
|
1643.103 |
|
1654.941 |
|
1669.946 |
|
1655.577 |
|
1635.561 |
|
1605.393 |
|
1597.837 |
|
1590.795 |
|
1607.708 |
|
1611.796 |
|
1589.217 |
|
1587.864 |
|
1598.846 |
|
1595.724 |
|
1591.767 |
|
1591.767 |
|
1593.304 |
|
1613.496 |
|
1641.127 |
|
12/31/97 |
1652.967 |
1650.89 |
|
1652.774 |
|
1637.92 |
|
1625.711 |
|
1610.42 |
|
1562.528 |
|
1554.605 |
|
1583.383 |
|
1596.587 |
|
1596.181 |
|
1613.395 |
|
1632.364 |
|
1626.643 |
|
1612.877 |
|
1607.337 |
|
1592.873 |
|
1598.612 |
|
1621.285 |
|
1634.18 |
|
1626.88 |
|
1626.88 |
|
1643.096 |
|
1655.527 |
|
1671.205 |
|
1679.615 |
|
1685.211 |
|
1692.072 |
|
1706.844 |
|
1710.29 |
|
1711.828 |
|
1719.062 |
|
1714.224 |
|
1720 |
|
1718.431 |
|
1717.632 |
|
1726.222 |
|
1718.762 |
|
1734.645 |
|
1746.328 |
|
1747.177 |
|
1747.177 |
|
1745.856 |
|
1749.482 |
|
1748.272 |
|
1728.208 |
|
1754.047 |
|
1744.109 |
|
1757.106 |
|
1766.758 |
|
1769.339 |
|
1773.154 |
|
1784.309 |
|
1781.649 |
|
1786.294 |
|
1794.504 |
|
1794.482 |
|
1793.574 |
|
1802.396 |
|
1805.059 |
|
1807.904 |
|
1805.838 |
|
1802.67 |
|
1819.235 |
|
1835.398 |
|
1840.737 |
|
1838.415 |
|
1823.739 |
|
1798.908 |
|
1799.583 |
|
1817.398 |
|
1815.564 |
|
1835.505 |
|
1844.482 |
|
1834.125 |
|
1844.132 |
|
1850.563 |
|
1860.459 |
|
1998 - CURRENT PERIOD |
|
1859.628 |
|
1836.363 |
|
1818.711 |
|
1774.536 |
|
1789.677 |
|
1806.655 |
|
1829.301 |
|
1837.264 |
|
1839.102 |
|
1825.168 |
|
1816.631 |
|
1804.028 |
|
1817.294 |
|
1807.556 |
|
1804.465 |
|
1809.626 |
|
1802.198 |
|
1790.393 |
|
1771.896 |
|
1784.229 |
|
1775.434 |
|
1770.503 |
|
1754.703 |
|
1724.95 |
|
1706.786 |
|
1728.138 |
|
1730.781 |
|
1730.781 |
|
1710.284 |
|
1705.111 |
|
1703.02 |
|
1712.916 |
|
1722.445 |
|
1730.281 |
|
1731.472 |
|
1710.392 |
|
1684.958 |
|
1675.221 |
|
1646.059 |
|
1663.141 |
|
1684.932 |
|
1668.182 |
|
1663.077 |
|
1675.152 |
|
1696.925 |
|
1712.623 |
|
1707.728 |
|
1708.623 |
|
1721.424 |
|
1734.422 |
|
1743.948 |
|
1738.191 |
|
1744.878 |
|
1741.363 |
|
1744.743 |
|
1744.953 |
|
1739.033 |
|
1740.422 |
|
1742.84 |
|
1752.73 |
|
1759.182 |
|
1754.427 |
|
1753.009 |
|
1731.563 |
|
1711.585 |
|
1679.046 |
|
1664.64 |
|
1644.019 |
|
1622.534 |
|
1617.455 |
|
1630.373 |
|
1594.014 |
|
1569.596 |
|
1525.135 |
|
1514.037 |
|
1544.202 |
|
1579.146 |
|
1563.278 |
|
1521.334 |
|
1551.898 |
|
1534.041 |
|
1529.829 |
|
1534.245 |
|
1562.036 |
|
1541.509 |
|
1526.193 |
|
1503.303 |
|
1495.838 |
|
1480.806 |
|
1445.479 |
|
1390.822 |
|
1362.452 |
|
1284.489 |
|
1323.101 |
|
1340.447 |
|
1316.01 |
|
1318.99 |
|
1375.82 |
|
1340.66 |
|
1311.34 |
|
1344.41 |
|
1360.3 |
|
1360.31 |
|
1369.16 |
|
1351.71 |
|
1381.9 |
|
1379.53 |
|
1400.93 |
|
1430.76 |
|
1408.84 |
|
1404.28 |
|
1401.37 |
|
1392.94 |
|
1385.01 |
|
1333.74 |
|
1332.96 |
|
1283.67 |
|
1267.3 |
|
1228.06 |
|
1182.12 |
|
1212.87 |
|
1240.47 |
|
1220.79 |
|
1238.52 |
|
1276.25 |
|
1307.29 |
|
1343.65 |
|
1365.82 |
|
1372.15 |
|
1396.73 |
|
1399.05 |
|
1417.91 |
|
1415.59 |
|
1415.7 |
|
1427.11 |
|
1441.5 |
|
1474.05 |
|
1476.82 |
|
1497.62 |
|
1512.24 |
|
1525.61 |
|
1518.27 |
|
1512.58 |
|
1499.84 |
|
1495.14 |
|
1484.5 |
|
1488.79 |
|
1484.89 |
|
1494.93 |
|
1503.52 |
|
1503.56 |
|
1518.03 |
|
1512.32 |
|
1522.78 |
|
1533.1 |
|
1517.02 |
|
1520.78 |
|
1516.23 |
|
1506.76 |
|
1519.62 |
|
1530.56 |
|
1531.76 |
|
1533.85 |
|
1512.93 |
|
1508.68 |
|
1480.27 |
|
1486.51 |
|
1487.72 |
|
1502.83 |
|
1516.74 |
|
1533.13 |
|
1526.94 |
|
1544.39 |
|
1547.37 |
|
1557.5 |
|
1566.37 |
|
1572.46 |
|
12/31/98 |
1610.89 |
1608.42 |
|
1611.66 |
|
1633.44 |
|
1634.18 |
|
1647.22 |
|
1655.07 |
|
1633.09 |
|
1623.33 |
|
1604.99 |
|
1631.12 |
|
1646.37 |
|
1645.19 |
|
1620.08 |
|
1613.99 |
|
1612.46 |
|
1624.7 |
|
1608.74 |
|
1619.79 |
|
1632.3 |
|
1628.06 |
|
1611.58 |
|
1619.25 |
|
1596.81 |
|
1577.85 |
|
1572.32 |
|
1540.91 |
|
1521.67 |
|
1552.96 |
|
1523 |
|
1515.92 |
|
1489.92 |
|
1495.64 |
|
1500.41 |
|
1521.29 |
|
1525.75 |
|
1511.29 |
|
1501.88 |
|
1500.09 |
|
1508.22 |
|
1508.39 |
|
1499.15 |
|
1507.16 |
|
1522.3 |
|
1530.07 |
|
1527.2 |
|
1534.79 |
|
1534.87 |
|
1524.7 |
|
1534.14 |
|
1527.73 |
|
1525.04 |
|
1529.38 |
|
1517.99 |
|
1504.94 |
|
1467.54 |
|
1471.84 |
|
1504.67 |
|
1508.39 |
|
1531.36 |
|
1527.79 |
|
1523.51 |
|
1527.77 |
|
1541.32 |
|
1536.69 |
|
1524.19 |
|
1532.42 |
|
1555.26 |
|
1580.02 |
|
1599.1 |
|
1599.86 |
|
1601.07 |
|
1616.05 |
|
1581.03 |
|
1592.32 |
|
1635.23 |
|
1643.81 |
|
1655.08 |
|
1667.52 |
|
1668.29 |
|
1662.38 |
|
1660.36 |
|
1660.03 |
|
1661.84 |
|
1659.23 |
|
1665.8 |
|
1662.43 |
|
1672.95 |
|
1695.14 |
|
1714.15 |
|
1723.74 |
|
1730.09 |
|
1700.62 |
|
1693.68 |
|
1698.18 |
|
1712.5 |
|
1719.71 |
|
1723.86 |
|
1690.41 |
|
1667.62 |
|
1671.33 |
|
1661.98 |
|
1684.28 |
|
1679.58 |
|
1676.97 |
|
1674.13 |
|
1698.51 |
|
1715.91 |
|
1704.74 |
|
1709.78 |
|
1698.47 |
|
1682.5 |
|
1657.65 |
|
1666.76 |
|
1694.98 |
|
1703.44 |
|
1709.87 |
|
1726.72 |
|
1718.67 |
|
1717.72 |
|
1702.94 |
|
1702.84 |
|
1724.42 |
|
1745.64 |
|
1760.44 |
|
1760.44 |
|
1747.77 |
|
1755.72 |
|
1755.86 |
|
1741.2 |
|
1749.25 |
|
1761.78 |
|
1766.84 |
|
1762.33 |
|
1775.38 |
|
1792.03 |
|
1789.91 |
|
1775.07 |
|
1745.02 |
|
1749.23 |
|
1737.21 |
|
1725.32 |
|
1704.28 |
|
1718.19 |
|
1718.8 |
|
1699.82 |
|
1712.14 |
|
1703.89 |
|
1679.62 |
|
1654.3 |
|
1654.51 |
|
1648.16 |
|
1639.98 |
|
1628.23 |
|
1649.2 |
|
1651.59 |
|
1671.7 |
|
1671.03 |
|
1679.35 |
|
1668.47 |
|
1667.13 |
|
1673.52 |
|
1684.41 |
|
1684 |
|
1687.05 |
|
1679.96 |
|
1666.35 |
|
1646.96 |
|
1648.77 |
|
1661.19 |
|
1647.56 |
|
1680.25 |
|
1689.16 |
|
1680.46 |
|
1687.58 |
|
1700.64 |
|
1695.15 |
|
1689.68 |
|
1682.52 |
|
1659.24 |
|
1675.45 |
|
1670.54 |
|
1644.77 |
|
1648.95 |
|
1620.78 |
|
1608.79 |
|
1627.21 |
|
1614.78 |
|
1626.57 |
|
1649.13 |
|
1634.52 |
|
1646.4 |
|
1644.05 |
|
1658.88 |
|
1652.46 |
|
1650.92 |
|
1660.52 |
|
1639.45 |
|
1618.97 |
|
1619.03 |
|
1601.05 |
|
1578.78 |
|
1586.75 |
|
1598.29 |
|
1599.69 |
|
1616.77 |
|
1613.22 |
|
1605.56 |
|
1609.74 |
|
1633.03 |
|
1655.81 |
|
1667.9 |
|
1670.11 |
|
1693.92 |
|
1699.51 |
|
1709.24 |
|
1719.64 |
|
1724.4 |
|
1734.08 |
|
1729.4 |
|
1737.83 |
|
1750.44 |
|
1765.74 |
|
1765.8 |
|
1784.96 |
|
1781.91 |
|
1780.16 |
|
1755.73 |
|
1761.51 |
|
1773.04 |
|
1765.91 |
|
1754.68 |
|
1753.25 |
|
1779.36 |
|
1795.43 |
|
1800.06 |
|
1800.03 |
|
1812.16 |
|
1796.99 |
|
1803.95 |
|
1818.57 |
|
1788.92 |
|
1784.02 |
|
1799.5 |
|
1803.14 |
|
1806.99 |
|
1840.15 |
|
1848.59 |
|
1865.82 |
|
1873.47 |
|
1889.46 |
|
1924.03 |
|
1921.75 |
|
1953.31 |
|
12/31/99 |
1953.31 |
|
1996 PEAK TO 1998 PEAK |
1998 PEAK TO CURRENT |
1996 PEAK TO CURRENT |
Russell 2000 |
38.5% |
5.0% |
45.4% |
Russell 2000 Value |
60.2 |
-16.6 |
33.7 |
Russell 2000 Growth |
19.3 |
26.2 |
50.6 |
CONCENTRATED |
|||
Royce Premier |
43.1 |
6.2 |
51.9 |
Royce Trust & GiftShares |
61.7 |
44.7 |
133.9 |
BROADLY DIVERSIFIED FUNDS |
|||
Royce Micro-Cap |
43.1 |
-2.5 |
39.5 |
Pennsylvania Mutual |
46.7 |
-1.4 |
44.7 |
Royce Total Return |
51.1 |
-2.6 |
47.2 |
Royce Low-Priced Stock |
36.4 |
13.0 |
54.1 |
Royce Opportunity |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
All Royce Funds either approximated or beat the Russell 2000 index during the last full market cycle, attributable primarily to outperformance during the cycle's decline.
Four out of seven Royce Funds are outperforming the index in the 1998 peak-to-current period. Once again, outperformance relates primarily to better down market results.
Five out of six Royce Funds are either approximating or outperforming the Russell 2000 from the 1996 peak.
8 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
During a period in
which growth has dominated, |
1998 SMALL-CAP PEAK
4/21/98-12/31/99 |
1999
SMALL-CAP
LOW |
||
|
||||
RUSSELL 2000 |
5.0 |
% |
33.1 |
% |
RUSSELL 2000 VALUE |
-16.6 |
11.5 |
||
|
||||
ROYCE
PREMIER FUND |
6.2 |
30.8 |
||
|
||||
ROYCE
MICRO-CAP FUND* |
-2.5 |
36.5 |
||
|
||||
PENNSYLVANIA
MUTUAL FUND* |
-1.4 |
21.9 |
||
|
||||
ROYCE
SELECT FUND |
n/a |
42.6 |
||
|
||||
ROYCE
TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND* |
44.8 |
65.2 |
||
|
||||
ROYCE
TOTAL RETURN FUND |
-2.6 |
12.9 |
||
|
||||
ROYCE
LOW-PRICED STOCK FUND |
13.0 |
46.9 |
||
|
||||
ROYCE
OPPORTUNITY FUND |
21.8 |
51.5 |
||
|
*All performance and risk information
reflect Investment Class results. Shares of the Funds' Consultant Class bear
an annual distribution expense and are subject to a deferred sales charge, which
are not borne by the Investment Class. See pages 10-25 for a complete discussion
of performance returns.
9 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
ROYCE PREMIER FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW
|
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
11.0 |
% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
4.2 |
|
1-Year |
11.5 |
|
3-Year |
12.1 |
|
5-Year |
14.4 |
|
Since Inception (12/31/91) |
13.7 |
*Not annualized.
MORNINGSTAR VOLATILITY MEASURES*
|
RPR |
Category |
Best Decile |
Standard Deviation |
17.44 |
25.72 |
18.20 |
Mstar Risk Ratio |
0.94 |
1.31 |
1.00 |
Beta |
0.67 |
1.00 |
0.69 |
*Three years ended 12/31/99. Category Median and Best Decile
Breakpoint based on
289 small-cap objective funds (lowest expense class only) with at least three
years of history.
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE
COMPARISON
All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater, in Percentages (%)
RPR |
Russell |
|
2/12/92-7/8/92 |
0.0 |
-12.0 |
3/18/94-12/9/94 |
-4.2 |
-12.3 |
5/22/96-7/24/96 |
-6.4 |
-15.4 |
1/22/97-4/25/97 |
0.3 |
-9.0 |
10/13/97-1/12/98 |
-11.0 |
-11.3 |
4/21/98-10/8/98 |
-26.9 |
-36.5 |
Year |
RPR |
|
|
||
1999 |
11.5 |
% |
1998 |
6.7 |
|
1997 |
18.4 |
|
1996 |
18.1 |
|
1995 |
17.8 |
|
1994 |
3.3 |
|
1993 |
19.0 |
|
1992 |
15.8 |
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Royce Premier Fund (RPR) was no exception to the oddities that affected small-cap value investing in 1999. For the full year, RPR was up 11.5%, lagging its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000, which was up 21.3%. RPR's average annual total return since inception (12/31/91) was 13.7%.
The Fund exemplified in many ways the topsy-turvy nature of the last year. RPR atypically lost ground against its benchmark in the first quarter's downturn and then atypically outperformed it during the subsequent second-quarter rally. The second half of this year saw more historically characteristic performance patterns RPR outperformed the Russell 2000 in the third-quarter downturn and lagged in the fourth-quarter upswing. With these ups and downs, RPR's performance was virtually flat through the end of the third quarter, before taking off in the fourth quarter, reinforcing the need for a long-term investment outlook.
The Fund's use of concentration, in our view, neither hindered nor helped its 1999 performance. RPR's preference for small-cap companies with "higher quality" balance sheets trading at low valuations was out of step with a market that rewarded higher-risk, higher-valuation investments. However, we did have our share of success stories, reflected in the Fund's total net realized and unrealized gain on investments of $58,817,696.
The Fund's holdings in the Technology sector made the greatest positive impact on its performance, followed by Health stocks at a distant second. This was not surprising, considering technology's dominance of the market as a whole last year. In RPR's portfolio, Technology's strong performance came without the benefit of a single Internet issue; in fact, the bulk of our technology holdings are not "cutting edge" companies. The increase in the portfolio's median market capitalization, from $534 million at 12/31/98 to $945 million at year end, was in part due to the addition of top positions in this sector, such as Comdisco and National Instruments. We also initiated new positions in two information technology service companies, CIBER and Keane, when the market's Y2K concerns brought their prices down.
Hurting the Fund's performance in 1999 were companies in the Consumer Products and Financial Intermediaries sectors. We took advantage of low prices in the latter sector throughout the year, particularly when insurance company stocks declined to what we believe were attractive levels. We added significantly to our position in Commerce Group and made new purchases in Medical Assurance and White Mountain Insurance Group.
In the Industrial Services sector, we increased our exposure during the year in the transportation and logistics industry, adding Circle International Group and buying additional shares of Air Express International (currently merging), as we were attracted by the low valuations of this under-followed industry. We initiated a position in Interim Services, a company that provides staffing services, because of its combination of low valuations and high balance sheet quality. New portfolio positions in the Natural Resources sector included Nabors Industries, an energy services company, and Devon Energy, an oil and gas exploration company. Companies in this industry drew our interest when prices in oil stocks fell dramatically in the first quarter.
Although valuations for the portfolio have risen as measured by weighted average P/E and P/B ratios, we still see plenty of return potential based on each company's underlying fundamentals.
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
1999 Net Realized
and Unrealized Gain
Comdisco |
$16,433,452 |
Avnet |
7,662,786 |
Charming Shoppes |
7,537,898 |
Chiron Corporation |
7,426,821 |
Air Express International |
7,154,657 |
Comdisco This firm has leveraged its expertise in leasing computer equipment and technology into a profitable combination of leasing information technology services, Internet access and Internet venture capital opportunities.
Charming Shoppes The stock of this women's fashion retailer, a long-term holding with solid (and, in our view, improving) business fundamentals, continues to benefit from the increasing attention of other investors.
10 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME
Trenwick Group |
$7,312,663 |
New England Business Service |
6,266,752 |
Unifi |
5,440,913 |
Mutual Risk Management |
5,253,421 |
Kaydon Corporation |
5,171,867 |
Trenwick Group This mid-size re-insurer was confronted with two difficulties insurance stock prices dropped throughout the year and the stock price was further penalized by what we think was an important and positive acquisition. We remain confident that they will survive, and perhaps thrive, when insurance stocks recover.
New England Business Service Unfortunately, 1999 was as bad as 1998 was good for this business product marketer, with the decline in stock price exacerbated by a modestly missed third-quarter earnings report. Our continued optimism stems from the company's management strength and diverse client base, as well as what we think is a very favorable valuation.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$945 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
17.0x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
2.1x |
Weighted Average Yield |
1.0% |
Fund Net Assets |
$568 million |
Turnover Rate |
48% |
Symbol |
RYPRX |
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets
Comdisco |
3.7 |
% |
Interim Services |
3.4 |
|
Avnet |
3.4 |
|
Haemonetics |
3.1 |
|
National Computer Systems |
3.1 |
|
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
3.1 |
|
Florida Rock Industries |
2.8 |
|
Air Express International |
2.7 |
|
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
2.6 |
|
Simpson Manufacturing |
2.6 |
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN
% of Net Assets
Technology |
24.2 |
% |
Industrial Services |
14.8 |
|
Industrial Products |
13.8 |
|
Financial Intermediaries |
12.9 |
|
Financial Services |
10.4 |
|
Natural Resources |
8.0 |
|
Health |
3.1 |
|
Consumer Products |
2.1 |
|
Consumer Services |
1.8 |
|
Cash &Cash Equivalents |
8.9 |
ROYCE PREMIER FUND vs. RUSSELL 2000
|
RPR |
Russell 2000 |
12/31/1991 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
3/31/1992 |
10,160 |
10,750 |
6/30/1992 |
10,140 |
10,017 |
9/30/1992 |
10,440 |
10,303 |
12/31/1992 |
11,580 |
11,841 |
3/31/1993 |
12,125 |
12,346 |
6/30/1993 |
12,608 |
12,615 |
9/30/1993 |
12,923 |
13,718 |
12/31/1993 |
13,784 |
14,079 |
3/31/1994 |
13,891 |
13,704 |
6/30/1994 |
13,741 |
13,171 |
9/30/1994 |
14,258 |
14,085 |
12/31/1994 |
14,236 |
13,823 |
3/31/1995 |
14,851 |
14,460 |
6/30/1995 |
16,103 |
15,815 |
9/30/1995 |
16,807 |
17,378 |
12/31/1995 |
16,774 |
17,755 |
3/31/1996 |
17,339 |
18,662 |
6/30/1996 |
18,022 |
19,595 |
9/30/1996 |
18,469 |
19,662 |
12/31/1996 |
19,813 |
20,684 |
3/31/1997 |
20,041 |
19,613 |
6/30/1997 |
22,705 |
22,794 |
9/30/1997 |
24,837 |
26,186 |
12/31/1997 |
23,460 |
25,309 |
3/31/1998 |
25,726 |
27,852 |
6/30/1998 |
25,456 |
26,554 |
9/30/1998 |
21,762 |
21,206 |
12/31/1998 |
25,041 |
24,665 |
3/31/1999 |
22,137 |
23,328 |
6/30/1999 |
26,795 |
26,956 |
9/30/1999 |
25,151 |
25,252 |
12/31/1999 |
27,919 |
29,910 |
Includes reinvestment
of distributions.
11 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW
|
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
Through 12/31/99
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
13.3 |
% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
10.6 |
|
1-Year |
13.7 |
|
3-Year |
11.1 |
|
5-Year |
13.5 |
|
Since Inception (12/31/91) |
15.3 |
*Not annualized.
|
RMC |
Category |
Best
Quartile |
Standard Deviation |
21.07 |
23.85 |
19.73 |
Mstar Risk Ratio |
1.17 |
1.33 |
1.14 |
Beta |
0.73 |
0.80 |
0.67 |
*Three years ended 12/31/99.
Category Median and Best Decile Breakpoint based on 24 micro-cap
objective funds (lowest expense class only) with at least three years of history.
(All small-cap objective funds with median market capitalizations below $250
million.)
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater, in Percentages (%)
RMC |
Russell |
|
2/12/92-7/8/92 |
-1.5 |
-12.0 |
3/18/94-12/9/94 |
-4.4 |
-12.3 |
5/22/96-7/24/96 |
-8.7 |
-15.4 |
1/22/97-4/25/97 |
-5.1 |
-9.0 |
10/13/97-1/12/98 |
-7.8 |
-11.3 |
4/21/98-10/8/98 |
-33.6 |
-36.5 |
CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL RETURNS
Year |
RMC |
|
|
||
1999 |
13.7 |
% |
1998 |
-3.3 |
|
1997 |
24.7 |
|
1996 |
15.5 |
|
1995 |
19.1 |
|
1994 |
3.6 |
|
1993 |
23.7 |
|
1992 |
29.4 |
12 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
If Julius Caesar had gotten his way and been allowed to begin the calendar year with the spring equinox, we would be quite pleased with Royce Micro-Cap Fund's (RMC) performance. After getting off to a slow start in the first quarter, it finished strongly in 1999. For the last nine months of the year (3/31/99 - 12/31/99), RMC was up 35.5% versus 28.2% for its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000. Unfortunately, the difficult first quarter hindered its 1999 performance. For the full year, RMC was up 13.7% versus a gain of 21.3% for the Russell 2000. RMC's average annual total return since inception (12/31/91) was 15.3%.
After being virtually ignored from April 98 through April 99, micro-cap securities began to rebound in the second quarter, led by the technology sector. RMC followed suit, posting strong second-quarter results, holding its own in the third-quarter downdraft and performing solidly in the fourth quarter. In a year characterized by wildly divergent micro-cap stock performance, we are not unhappy with RMC's return, given its relatively low-risk profile. The micro-cap companies that we hold generally possess solid balance sheets and earnings records. Although we avoided Internet-related micro-cap companies, we still enjoyed a measure of success, shown in the Fund's net realized and unrealized gain on investments of $12,264,066.
The Technology sector, which dominated every asset class in the market last year, was our best performer in 1999, with Financial Services a distant second. We enjoyed particular success in the semiconductor industry with companies such as Exar, Unitrode and Electroglas. In the Financial Services sector, we benefited from a strong performance from Duff & Phelps Credit Rating, a core holding. While the Industrial Services and Industrial Products sectors had the greatest negative impact, with most positions showing losses. These sectors contain what we believe are solid companies, including Puerto Rican Cement, Woodhead Industries and Circle International Group.
There are several new names among the Fund's top ten holdings, such as Rainbow Technologies and Pioneer-Standard Electronics. We initiated a new position in Carlisle Holdings because we liked the way this offshore consolidator of facilities and staffing services restructured to focus on acquisitions and accounts. The relative lack of change in the Fund's core holdings reflects our ongoing confidence in the portfolio and our approach. We believe that the Fund's holdings at year end remain considerably undervalued by the market.
During 1999, we initiated a position in Input/Output, a manufacturer of seismic data instruments that we believe possesses excellent turnaround potential. Another new position was PAREXEL International, a service provider to the pharmaceutical industry, which we bought at approximately $9 per share in the fourth quarter when its market position and short-term earnings difficulties attracted our attention.
While we are pleased by the recent resurgence in micro-cap performance, we are even more excited about the opportunities in the non-technology sectors where we believe potential is yet to be realized. Many of these securities performed worse in 1999 than those of companies that are highly leveraged and have no earnings history. This lack of correlation between individual company quality and 1999 performance fuels our hopes for a profitable new year.
All performance and risk information presented herein is for RMC's Investment Class. Shares of RMC's Consultant Class, which commenced operations on May 4, 1998, bear an annual distribution expense which is not borne by the Investment Class.GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
1999 Net Realized and Unrealized Gain
Exar |
$2,393,902 |
Electroglas |
1,909,845 |
Kronos |
1,880,707 |
Coherent |
1,764,591 |
Performance Technologies |
1,369,732 |
Exar The management of this analog semiconductor manufacturer developed new telecommunications products that created a major turnaround in the company's prospects and caused the stock price to surge in the fourth quarter.
Electroglas A semiconductor capital equipment manufacturer and a long-term holding, the stock was purchased at a low point in the business cycle for semiconductors, only to rise precipitously in the subsequent rebound of semiconductor stocks.
GOOD IDEAS AT THE
TIME
1999 Net Realized and Unrealized Loss
Ezenia! |
$1,510,050 |
HMT Technology |
1,341,193 |
800 JR Cigar |
1,296,310 |
Special Metals |
1,170,356 |
Midwest Grain Products |
906,406 |
Ezenia! Formerly VideoServer, this supplier of video conferencing and network equipment was one of the many technology companies that suffered through the 1998 third-quarter downturn, but one of the few that failed to recover. We gave back most of the gains we made in 1998, as the stock nosedived in 1999.
HMT Technology Proof that 1999 was not a banner year for every technology company, this manufacturer of high-performance thin-film disks for use in hard disk drives has so far been unable to recover from excess supply and price pressure in the computer media storage business. We are holding on for now, but are uncertain about its future.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$175 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
14.1x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
1.3x |
Weighted Average Yield |
0.7% |
Fund Net Assets |
$113 million |
Turnover Rate |
24% |
Symbol (Investment Class) |
RYOTX |
(Consultant Class) |
RYMCX |
Kronos |
3.3 |
% |
Rainbow Technologies |
2.1 |
|
Richardson Electronics |
2.1 |
|
Sevenson Environmental Services |
2.0 |
|
Pioneer-Standard Electronics |
1.9 |
|
Conso International |
1.9 |
|
Carlisle Holdings |
1.8 |
|
Lazare Kaplan International |
1.8 |
|
Florida Rock Industries |
1.7 |
|
Thor Industries |
1.6 |
Technology |
32.2 |
% |
Industrial Services |
15.1 |
|
Industrial Products |
13.9 |
|
Consumer Products |
10.7 |
|
Natural Resources |
6.2 |
|
Health |
5.0 |
|
Financial Intermediaries |
2.5 |
|
Financial Services |
2.1 |
|
Consumer Services |
1.6 |
|
Miscellaneous |
4.5 |
|
Cash &Cash Equivalents |
6.2 |
Royce MICRO-CAP Fund vs.
Russell 2000
Value of $10,000
Invested on 12/31/91
|
RMC |
Russell |
12/31/1991 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
3/31/1992 |
11,100 |
10,750 |
6/30/1992 |
10,700 |
10,017 |
9/30/1992 |
11,421 |
10,303 |
12/31/1992 |
12,941 |
11,841 |
3/31/1993 |
14,184 |
12,346 |
6/30/1993 |
14,207 |
12,615 |
9/30/1993 |
15,316 |
13,718 |
12/31/1993 |
16,004 |
14,079 |
3/31/1994 |
16,127 |
13,704 |
6/30/1994 |
15,855 |
13,171 |
9/30/1994 |
16,770 |
14,085 |
12/31/1994 |
16,572 |
13,823 |
3/31/1995 |
17,185 |
14,460 |
6/30/1995 |
18,464 |
15,815 |
9/30/1995 |
19,717 |
17,378 |
12/31/1995 |
19,731 |
17,755 |
3/31/1996 |
20,544 |
18,662 |
6/30/1996 |
21,906 |
19,595 |
9/30/1996 |
21,172 |
19,662 |
12/31/1996 |
22,798 |
20,684 |
3/31/1997 |
22,602 |
19,613 |
6/30/1997 |
25,095 |
22,794 |
9/30/1997 |
29,015 |
26,186 |
12/31/1997 |
28,427 |
25,309 |
3/31/1998 |
31,360 |
27,852 |
6/30/1998 |
30,241 |
26,554 |
9/30/1998 |
23,981 |
21,206 |
12/31/1998 |
27,476 |
24,665 |
3/31/1999 |
23,042 |
23,328 |
6/30/1999 |
28,248 |
26,956 |
9/30/1999 |
27,573 |
25,252 |
12/31/1999 |
31,228 |
29,910 |
Includes reinvestment of distributions.
13 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
Through 12/31/99
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
5.8 |
% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
0.6 |
|
1-Year |
6.0 |
|
3-Year |
11.3 |
|
5-Year |
13.1 |
|
10-Year |
10.7 |
|
20-Year |
14.1 |
|
25-Year |
19.7 |
|
Since Inception (6/30/73) |
15.6 |
|
*Not annualized. |
MORNINGSTAR VOLATILITY MEASURES*
|
PMF |
Category |
Best Decile |
Standard Deviation |
16.64 |
25.72 |
18.20 |
Mstar Risk Ratio |
0.93 |
1.31 |
1.00 |
Beta |
0.61 |
1.00 |
0.69 |
*Three years ended 12/31/99.
Category Median and Best Decile Breakpoint based
on 289 small-cap objective funds (lowest expense class only) with at least three
years of history.
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE
COMPARISON
All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater
Over the Last 15 Years, in Percentages (%)
PMF |
Russell 2000 |
|
7/3/86-9/16/86 |
-8.6 |
-14.6 |
8/25/87-10/28/87 |
-23.2 |
-38.9 |
10/9/89-10/31/90 |
-20.9 |
-32.5 |
2/12/92-7/8/92 |
-2.6 |
-12.0 |
3/18/94-12/9/94 |
-7.6 |
-12.3 |
5/22/96-7/24/96 |
-6.5 |
-15.4 |
1/22/97-4/25/97 |
-2.5 |
-9.0 |
10/13/97-1/12/98 |
-7.5 |
-11.3 |
4/21/98-10/8/98 |
-25.1 |
-36.5 |
CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL RETURNS
Year |
PMF |
Year |
PMF |
||
|
|||||
1999 |
6.0 |
% |
1991 |
31.8 |
% |
1998 |
4.2 |
1990 |
-11.5 |
||
1997 |
25.0 |
1989 |
16.7 |
||
1996 |
12.8 |
1988 |
24.6 |
||
1995 |
18.7 |
1987 |
1.4 |
||
1994 |
-0.7 |
1986 |
11.2 |
||
1993 |
11.3 |
1985 |
26.8 |
||
1992 |
16.2 |
14 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund (PMF), our flagship fund, had a relatively disappointing 1999, up 6.0% and lagging its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000 (21.3%). The Fund's average annual total return for the 25 years ended December 31, 1999 was 19.7%.
For small-cap value in general, and PMF in particular, performance anomalies were common in 1999. After losing ground against its benchmark during the first quarter, the Fund outperformed the Russell 2000 during the more dynamic second quarter and in the third quarter downturn. With these ups and downs, PMF's performance was virtually flat through the end of the third quarter, and holding its own relative to its benchmark. During the explosive fourth quarter, however, the Fund failed to keep pace, gaining only 5.8% while the Russell 2000 raced ahead 18.4%.
We would like to think that the stock prices of the companies that we own would generally come to reflect their business fundamentals, over time. However, in 1999 our holdings received little attention from a market that was focused on momentum, and the portfolio's valuations, as measured by weighted average P/E and P/B ratios, actually declined from the end of 1998. While the attributes that we seek, namely strong balance sheets and strong records of earnings, did not consistently translate into high performance in 1999, we did have our share of success stories, shown in the panel below and in the Fund's total net realized and unrealized gain on investments of $24,584,046.
Despite these anomalies, portfolio turnover was within the Fund's historical range, at 21% for the year. We increased our holdings in the Technology sector, which also saw the greatest positive impact on performance. We initiated several new positions in information technology service companies whose valuations became attractive to us in a moment of Y2K anxiety in the market, including CIBER, JDA Software Group and Keane. Other new technology companies included Arrow Electronics, the world's largest distributor of electronics components and computer products, whose stock price had been depressed since the Asian crisis, and Plantronics, a telecommunications equipment manufacturer and market leader in the rapidly growing headset industry.
The Natural Resources sector also enjoyed strong 1999 performance. We added to our position in Tidewater, an energy services company whose price fell dramatically earlier in the year owing to a first-quarter downturn that affected many energy stocks. We also took a new position in Input/Output, a manufacturer of seismic data instruments that we believe has excellent turnaround potential. In other sectors, we increased two of our larger positions Arnold Industries, an attractively valued trucking company in an industry that received scant investment attention, and Penn Engineering & Manufacturing, a commercial fastener manufacturer that was selling at what we believe was an exceptionally low price. We sold our positions in Unitrode, The Topps Company, Eaton Vance and Applebee's International at substantial profits.
In our view, PMF's portfolio is well-positioned to take advantage of opportunities in the small- and micro-cap sectors. We believe that when the market again emphasizes "quality," as opposed to its current emphasis on momentum, good things will follow for Pennsylvania Mutual Fund.
All performance and risk information presented herein is for PMF's Investment Class. Shares of PMF's Consultant Class, which commenced operations on June 18, 1997, bear an annual distribution expense which is not borne by the Investment Class.
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
1999 Net Realized and Unrealized Gain
Exar |
$8,889,154 |
Unitrode Corporation |
7,952,947 |
Avnet |
3,942,731 |
The Topps Company |
3,485,053 |
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
3,298,253 |
Exar This manufacturer of integrated circuits for high-speed broadband communications developed new products that created a major turnaround in the company's prospects, leading the stock price to surge in the fourth quarter.
Unitrode Corporation Small-cap stocks are often subject to an advantageous "urge to merge," and a takeover last summer by Texas Instruments sent the price of this analog semiconductor manufacturer well beyond our initial sell target.
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME
1999 Net Realized and Unrealized Loss
Medical Assurance |
$2,742,045 |
New England Business Service |
2,712,277 |
PXRE Group |
2,683,768 |
Stone & Webster |
2,499,517 |
800 JR Cigar |
2,488,250 |
Medical Assurance The stock of this malpractice protection insurance provider plummeted during 1999 along with that of other insurance companies. We continued to build our position as its price dropped, confident that the stock will rebound once insurance stocks recover.
New England Business Service Unfortunately, 1999 was as bad as 1998 was good for this business product marketer, with the decline in stock price exacerbated by a modestly missed third-quarter earnings report. Our continued optimism stems from the company's management strength and diverse client base, as well as what we think is a very favorable valuation.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$412 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
14.2x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
1.6x |
Weighted Average Yield |
1.5% |
Fund Net Assets |
$500 million |
Turnover Rate |
21% |
Symbol (Investment Class) |
PENNX |
(Consultant Class) |
RYPCX |
TOP 10 POSITIONS %
of Net Assets
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
1.9 |
% |
Simpson Manufacturing |
1.6 |
|
Duff & Phelps Credit Rating |
1.5 |
|
Velcro Industries |
1.5 |
|
Curtiss-Wright |
1.4 |
|
Circle International Group |
1.3 |
|
Florida Rock Industries |
1.3 |
|
Haemonetics |
1.3 |
|
Arnold Industries |
1.3 |
|
National Computer Systems |
1.2 |
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN
% of Net Assets
Technology |
16.7 |
% |
Industrial Products |
16.7 |
|
Industrial Services |
16.2 |
|
Financial Services |
10.2 |
|
Financial Intermediaries |
9.7 |
|
Consumer Products |
9.4 |
|
Natural Resources |
7.0 |
|
Consumer Services |
3.7 |
|
Health |
3.0 |
|
Miscellaneous |
4.5 |
|
Cash &Cash Equivalents |
2.9 |
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL FUND
VS. RUSSELL 2000
Value of $10,000
Invested on 12/31/79
|
PMF |
Russell 2000 |
12/31/1979 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
03/31/1980 |
8,097 |
8,719 |
06/30/1980 |
9,675 |
10,480 |
09/30/1980 |
11,929 |
12,853 |
12/31/1980 |
12,571 |
13,858 |
03/31/1981 |
13,352 |
15,007 |
06/30/1981 |
14,672 |
15,564 |
09/30/1981 |
11,185 |
12,835 |
12/31/1981 |
12,654 |
14,140 |
03/31/1982 |
11,569 |
12,822 |
06/30/1982 |
11,761 |
12,637 |
09/30/1982 |
13,139 |
13,969 |
12/31/1982 |
16,889 |
17,667 |
03/31/1983 |
20,106 |
20,749 |
06/30/1983 |
23,368 |
24,959 |
09/30/1983 |
23,078 |
23,736 |
12/31/1983 |
23,731 |
22,813 |
03/31/1984 |
22,910 |
21,282 |
06/30/1984 |
22,708 |
20,642 |
09/30/1984 |
24,155 |
21,777 |
12/31/1984 |
24,476 |
21,146 |
03/31/1985 |
27,102 |
24,087 |
06/30/1985 |
27,980 |
24,941 |
09/30/1985 |
27,896 |
23,854 |
12/31/1985 |
31,029 |
27,711 |
03/31/1986 |
34,337 |
31,634 |
06/30/1986 |
36,270 |
33,169 |
09/30/1986 |
33,713 |
29,105 |
12/31/1986 |
34,499 |
29,286 |
03/31/1987 |
39,515 |
36,407 |
06/30/1987 |
40,024 |
36,148 |
09/30/1987 |
41,910 |
37,662 |
12/31/1987 |
34,974 |
26,717 |
03/31/1988 |
40,024 |
31,813 |
06/30/1988 |
42,645 |
33,910 |
09/30/1988 |
43,221 |
33,591 |
12/31/1988 |
43,567 |
33,369 |
03/31/1989 |
46,625 |
35,939 |
06/30/1989 |
49,343 |
38,228 |
09/30/1989 |
51,450 |
40,809 |
12/31/1989 |
50,838 |
38,789 |
03/31/1990 |
50,391 |
37,931 |
06/30/1990 |
52,023 |
39,395 |
09/30/1990 |
43,413 |
29,728 |
12/31/1990 |
44,972 |
31,223 |
03/31/1991 |
54,074 |
40,508 |
06/30/1991 |
54,620 |
39,881 |
09/30/1991 |
56,800 |
43,131 |
12/31/1991 |
59,288 |
45,602 |
03/31/1992 |
63,758 |
49,022 |
06/30/1992 |
62,132 |
45,679 |
09/30/1992 |
63,598 |
46,986 |
12/31/1992 |
68,883 |
53,996 |
03/31/1993 |
72,410 |
56,301 |
06/30/1993 |
71,636 |
57,529 |
09/30/1993 |
74,479 |
62,557 |
12/31/1993 |
76,632 |
64,202 |
03/31/1994 |
75,804 |
62,494 |
06/30/1994 |
74,144 |
60,063 |
09/30/1994 |
76,910 |
64,232 |
12/31/1994 |
76,079 |
63,037 |
03/31/1995 |
79,160 |
65,943 |
06/30/1995 |
84,298 |
72,122 |
09/30/1995 |
90,249 |
79,247 |
12/31/1995 |
90,321 |
80,967 |
03/31/1996 |
92,200 |
85,104 |
06/30/1996 |
95,482 |
89,360 |
09/30/1996 |
95,482 |
89,663 |
12/31/1996 |
101,928 |
94,326 |
03/31/1997 |
102,356 |
89,440 |
06/30/1997 |
115,263 |
103,947 |
09/30/1997 |
129,890 |
119,414 |
12/31/1997 |
127,367 |
115,414 |
03/31/1998 |
139,583 |
127,013 |
06/30/1998 |
138,606 |
121,094 |
09/30/1998 |
117,921 |
96,706 |
12/31/1998 |
132,673 |
112,479 |
03/31/1999 |
116,788 |
106,382 |
06/30/1999 |
139,532 |
122,925 |
09/30/1999 |
132,853 |
115,156 |
12/31/1999 |
140,582 |
136,528 |
15 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
Includes reinvestment of distributions.
ROYCE SELECT FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
Through 12/31/99
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
10.7 |
% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
10.7 |
|
1-Year |
35.4 |
|
Since Inception (11/18/98) |
40.3 |
*Not annualized.
CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL RETURNS
Year |
RSF |
|
|
1999 |
35.4% |
16 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Royce Select Fund (RSF) made its first full year of performance a good one. In 1999, the Fund was up 35.4%, significantly ahead of its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000, which was up 21.3%. The Fund's average annual total return since inception (11/18/98) was 40.3%, well in excess of what we think is sustainable over time.
Although the Fund got off to a slow start, it managed to decline less than its benchmark in the first quarter. RSF stayed well ahead of the Russell 2000 in the second and third quarters and performed solidly in the fourth quarter. RSF achieved its impressive return in a year in which value considerably underperformed growth across all capitalization categories. The Fund's modest asset size and healthy cash flow contributed to 1999 performance by providing the flexibility needed to capture opportunities.
The Fund's portfolio of small- and micro-cap stocks took on slightly more risk in 1999, although the attributes that we look for in the portfolio remained generally conservative, as measured by balance sheet quality and cash flow characteristics. This approach proved to be effective in an environment that rewarded higher risk. The sectors that made the greatest positive impact on the Fund's performance were Technology and Industrial Services, while those with the greatest negative impact were Consumer Products and Industrial Products. The Fund's success can be seen in its total net realized and unrealized gain on investments in 1999 of $2,121,055.
In 1999, we found what we think are still good values in the under-followed logistics and transportation industry, increasing our position in Pittston BAX Group and initiating one in Circle International Group. Taking advantage of bargain-priced insurance stocks throughout 1999, we took new positions in LaSalle Re Holdings, a reinsurance company, and PMA Capital Cl. A, an insurer offering property, casualty and workers' compensation coverage. We also purchased Haemonetics, a manufacturer of medical products for the collection of blood and plasma.
Seven new positions were among the Fund's top ten holdings, including Titan Exploration, an oil and gas exploration company whose price declined in the first quarter, Henry Schein, a dental supply distributor whose stock we purchased during a short-term earnings interruption, Interim Services, a leading staffing services company with a solid balance sheet, and Pioneer-Standard Electronics, an electronics and computer components distributor whose price has yet to fully recover from the Asian crisis.
We are very pleased with the Fund's early performance, and remain excited about the Fund's long-term return potential. The Fund invests in a concentrated portfolio of small- and micro-cap stocks and is available only for qualified investors. Daily net asset values are available on our website, www.roycefunds.com, or by calling Investor Services at (800) 221-4268.
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
REMEC |
$301,205 |
Pioneer-Standard Electronics |
157,500 |
Interim Services |
120,883 |
Arrow Electronics |
114,449 |
Charming Shoppes |
111,605 |
Pioneer-Standard Electronics The price of this international distributor of electronic components and computer systems remained low through the first quarter of 1999, following 1998's third-quarter correction. It began to recover in 1999's second quarter and remained at lofty levels through the end of the year.
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME
North Face (The) |
$159,995 |
PCD |
81,680 |
Structural Dynamics Research |
59,566 |
Cornell Corrections |
42,490 |
Frozen Food Express Industries |
37,438 |
North Face (The)
The stock price of this outerwear designer reflected the turmoil that the company
suffered both financially and organizationally in 1999. We like their strong
brand name, but see a need for the company to strengthen all aspects of its
operation before any rebound occurs.
PCD This designer and manufacturer of electronic connectors was penalized by earnings disappointments and a failure to expand its business and rebuild its inventory effectively. We are sticking with it for now, confident that management can make up for past mistakes.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$387 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
13.2x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
1.2x |
Weighted Average Yield |
0.7% |
Fund Net Assets |
$10 million |
Turnover Rate |
136% |
Titan Exploration |
4.7 |
% |
Schein (Henry) |
4.5 |
|
Interim Services |
3.6 |
|
Pittson BAX Group |
3.4 |
|
LaSalle Re Holdings |
3.3 |
|
PMACapital Cl. A |
3.3 |
|
Medical Assurance |
3.2 |
|
Zenith National Insurance |
3.1 |
|
Pioneer-Standard Electronics |
2.9 |
|
North Face (The) |
2.9 |
Industrial Services |
21.9 |
% |
Technology |
18.5 |
|
Financial Intermediaries |
16.0 |
|
Natural Resources |
14.4 |
|
Industrial Products |
9.2 |
|
Health |
6.5 |
|
Consumer Products |
6.2 |
|
Consumer Services |
2.9 |
|
Financial Services |
2.7 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
1.7 |
ROYCE SELECT FUND VS.
RUSSELL 2000
Value of $10,000
Invested on 11/18/98
|
RSF |
Russell 2000 |
11/18/1998 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
11/30/1998 |
10,016 |
10,148 |
12/31/1998 |
10,785 |
10,776 |
01/31/1999 |
10,889 |
10,919 |
02/28/1999 |
10,433 |
10,035 |
03/31/1999 |
10,336 |
10,192 |
04/30/1999 |
11,605 |
11,105 |
05/31/1999 |
12,454 |
11,267 |
06/30/1999 |
13,196 |
11,776 |
07/31/1999 |
13,222 |
11,453 |
08/31/1999 |
13,134 |
11,030 |
09/30/1999 |
13,190 |
11,032 |
10/31/1999 |
12,945 |
11,077 |
11/30/1999 |
13,381 |
11,738 |
12/31/1999 |
14,606 |
13,067 |
Includes reinvestment
of distributions.
17 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL
RETURNS
Through 12/31/99
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
18.9% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
21.7 |
1-Year |
41.8 |
3-Year |
28.8 |
Since Inception (12/27/95) |
27.9 |
*Not annualized. |
MORNINGSTAR VOLATILITY MEASURES*
RTG |
Category
Median
|
Best
Decile
Breakpoint
|
|
Standard Deviation |
24.47 |
25.72 |
18.20 |
Mstar Risk Ratio |
0.78 |
1.31 |
1.00 |
Beta |
0.70 |
1.00 |
0.69 |
*Three years ended 12/31/99. Category
Median and Best Decile Breakpoint based on 289 small-cap objective funds (lowest
expense class only) with at least three years of history.
RTG |
Russell 2000 |
|
5/22/96-7/24/96 |
-3.5 |
-15.4 |
1/22/97-4/25/97 |
-0.5 |
-9.0 |
10/13/97-1/12/98 |
-3.8 |
-11.3 |
4/21/98-10/8/98 |
-30.7 |
-36.5 |
Year |
RTG |
|
|
||
1999 |
41.8 |
% |
1998 |
19.5 |
|
1997 |
26.0 |
|
1996 |
25.6 |
18 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund (RTG) had an outstanding year. In 1999, the Fund was up 41.8%, significantly ahead of its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000, which was up 21.3%. The Fund's average annual total return since inception (12/27/95) was 27.9%.
The Fund made up for its slow first-quarter start by substantially outperforming its benchmark in the second and third quarters and maintained a slight edge in the fourth quarter. RTG achieved its impressive return in a year in which value considerably underperformed growth across all capitalization categories. The Fund's modest asset size and relatively stable pool of capital gave it enough flexibility to take advantage of several profitable opportunities this year.
The long-term nature of the Fund's trust account structure enabled us to take on slightly more risk in a concentrated portfolio of both small- and micro-cap stocks. This approach was ideally suited to 1999's market environment, which rewarded higher risk. The sectors that made the greatest positive impact on the Fund's performance were Technology and Industrial Services. One measure of the Fund's success is its 1999 total realized and unrealized gain of $5,243,892.
We increased our exposure during the year in the Industrial Services and Natural Resources sectors. New positions in the Industrial Services sector included AirNet Systems and Pittston BAX Group, two conservatively capitalized logistics and transportation companies. We also picked up Olsten, a temporary employment agency in the process of a hoped-for major turnaround, at an average price of approximately $7.50 in the first half. We purchased a new position in Input/Output, a manufacturer of seismic data instruments for the oil and gas industry that we think has strong recovery potential. We also added to our position in Titan Exploration, an oil and gas exploration company, when energy stocks became cheaper earlier in the year.
From a portfolio diagnostics standpoint, there were few changes in 1999. However, several new positions were among the Fund's top ten holdings Stone & Webster, an engineering, design and construction firm in the process of restructuring; Interim Services, a staffing and career management services company that offers what in our view is a winning combination of attractive value and high balance sheet quality; and Henry Schein, a dental supply distributor whose stock we purchased during a short-term earnings interruption. Departing the portfolio were former top ten holdings Chiron and Sunglass Hut International, both of which appreciated beyond our sell targets.
As pleased as we were with RTG's 1999 performance, we remain excited about the portfolio's long-term return potential. The Fund remains one of the only gifting and estate-planning portfolios available. Daily net asset values are now available in most major newspapers, and can be found online by entering the Fund's symbol, RGFAX for the Investment Class or RGFCX for the Consultant Class. Along with our other funds, daily net asset values can also be found at www.roycefunds.com.
All performance
and risk information presented herein is for RTG's Investment Class. Shares
of RTG's Consultant Class, which commenced operations on September 26, 1997,
bear an annual distribution expense and are subject to a deferred sales charge,
which are not borne by the Investment Class.
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
1999 Net Realized and Unrealized Gain
Exar |
$436,047 |
REMEC |
353,986 |
Trex Company |
251,326 |
Check Point Software |
246,121 |
CIBER |
240,290 |
Exar
This manufacturer of integrated circuits for high-speed broadband communications
developed new products that created a major turnaround in the company's prospects,
leading the stock price to surge in the fourth quarter.
REMEC The stock of this microwave component manufacturer see-sawed up and down through most of 1999. Acquisition complications during the spring drove prices further down, enabling us to build a larger position before a major upsurge late in the fourth quarter.
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME
North Face (The) |
$224,213 |
800 JR Cigar |
142,764 |
Respironics |
126,215 |
PCD |
107,741 |
BHA Group Holdings |
95,493 |
North Face (The)
The stock price of this outerwear designer reflected the turmoil that the
company suffered both financially and organizationally in 1999. We like their
strong brand name, but see a need for the company to strengthen all aspects
of its operation before any rebound occurs.
800 JR Cigar A glut of premium cigars caused this mail-order distributor to miss quarterly earnings estimates and subsequently slump just like other tobacco-related companies did in 1999. We remain optimistic due to the company's low valuation and the fact that company management holds about 75% of the stock.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$383 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
15.5x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
1.4x |
Weighted Average Yield |
0.6% |
Fund Net Assets |
$19 million |
Turnover Rate |
152% |
Symbol (Investment Class) |
RGFAX |
(Consultant Class) |
RGFCX |
Stone & Webster |
4.2 |
% |
Titan Exploration |
3.5 |
|
Interim Services |
3.0 |
|
Schein (Henry) |
2.8 |
|
Medical Assurance |
2.8 |
|
Pittson BAX Group |
2.7 |
|
Input/Output |
2.7 |
|
RCM Technologies |
2.5 |
|
REMEC |
2.5 |
|
Carbo Ceramics |
2.5 |
Technology |
23.3 |
% |
Industrial Services |
18.6 |
|
Natural Resources |
14.8 |
|
Financial Intermediaries |
8.4 |
|
Consumer Products |
8.1 |
|
Health |
6.9 |
|
Industrial Products |
5.5 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
14.4 |
Value of $10,000 Invested on 12/27/95
|
RTG |
Russell 2000 |
12/27/1995 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
12/31/1995 |
10,020 |
10,064 |
03/31/1996 |
10,600 |
10,578 |
06/30/1996 |
11,500 |
11,107 |
09/30/1996 |
11,600 |
11,145 |
12/31/1996 |
12,580 |
11,724 |
03/31/1997 |
12,645 |
11,117 |
06/30/1997 |
14,111 |
12,920 |
09/30/1997 |
15,621 |
14,843 |
12/31/1997 |
15,853 |
14,346 |
03/31/1998 |
18,033 |
15,787 |
06/30/1998 |
17,941 |
15,052 |
09/30/1998 |
14,752 |
12,020 |
12/31/1998 |
18,941 |
13,981 |
03/31/1999 |
16,505 |
13,223 |
06/30/1999 |
22,067 |
15,279 |
09/30/1999 |
22,573 |
14,314 |
12/31/1999 |
26,848 |
16,954 |
Includes reinvestment
of distributions.
19 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
ROYCE TOTAL RETURN FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
Through 12/31/99
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
3.5 |
% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
-0.4 |
|
1-Year |
1.6 |
|
3-Year |
9.6 |
|
5-Year |
15.9 |
|
Since Inception (12/15/93) |
13.9 |
|
*Not annualized. |
RTR |
Category Median |
Best Decile Breakpoint |
|
Standard Deviation |
12.47 |
25.72 |
18.20 |
Mstar Risk Ratio |
0.67 |
1.31 |
1.00 |
Beta |
0.46 |
1.00 |
0.69 |
*Three years ended
12/31/99. Category Median and Best Decile Breakpoint based on 289 small-cap
objective funds (lowest expense class only) with at least three years of history.
RTR |
Russell 2000 |
|
3/18/94-12/9/94 |
1.8 |
-12.3 |
5/22/96-7/24/96 |
-0.5 |
-15.4 |
1/22/97-4/25/97 |
0.2 |
-9.0 |
10/13/97-1/12/98 |
-2.7 |
-11.3 |
4/21/98-10/8/98 |
-19.0 |
-36.5 |
CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL RETURNS
Year |
RTR |
|
|
||
1999 |
1.6 |
% |
1998 |
4.8 |
|
1997 |
23.7 |
|
1996 |
25.5 |
|
1995 |
26.9 |
|
1994 |
5.1 |
20 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
If, at the end of 1998, someone had asked us which of our portfolios would perform best in 1999, we would have put Royce Total Return Fund (RTR) at the top of the list. And we would have been dead wrong. For the full year, RTR was up 1.6%, significantly lagging its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000, which was up 21.3%. We were disappointed with the Fund's performance vis-a-vis the other Royce Funds and our long-term performance goals for the portfolio. That said, the Fund outperformed the Russell 2000 Value index, down 1.5%, and the Wilshire Small-Cap Value index, down 15.6%. The Fund also managed to finish in the top 46% of the 230 small-cap value funds tracked by Morningstar for 1999 (top 22% for the five years ended 12/31/99 out of 76 funds in the category). RTR's average annual total return since inception (12/15/93) was 13.9%.
The Fund began the year with uncharacteristic performance, losing ground to the Russell 2000 in the first-quarter downturn and unable to gain on its benchmark in the second-quarter rally. In the third quarter, RTR returned to its more historically typical standard of outperforming the Russell 2000 in a down market, and underperforming in the dynamic fourth quarter. The Fund's relative difficulties late in the year are primarily attributable to its low investment in technology and other high-growth companies during a period in which little else performed well.
RTR's net increase from investment operations in 1999 was $2.1 million, which includes $5.8 million of net investment income. The Fund's wide range of stock price performance can be seen in the panel below. We did not expect to be so severely penalized in 1999 for investing in what we viewed as lower-risk small-cap companies. The attributes that we seek, namely strong balance sheets, strong earnings records and dividends, did not consistently translate into high performance in 1999.
Making the greatest positive impact on the Fund's performance were technology and natural resources companies, unfortunately two of our smaller sectors. We did increase our technology holdings in 1999, adding to our position in Comdisco before selling most of it after its price ran up late in the year. We also increased our holdings in Industrial Products and Financial Intermediaries.
We initiated new positions in, among others, Kimball International Cl. B, a furniture manufacturer with what we hope are excellent financial characteristics; Puerto Rican Cement, a cement, ready-mix concrete and aggregates manufacturer with an attractively low price; and Sun Hydraulics, a manufacturer of fluid power system components that recently experienced what we think are temporary earnings difficulties. The plunging prices of insurance stocks made them very attractive to us throughout 1999, so we added WR Berkley and Mutual Risk Management and built a larger position in Trenwick Group.
We continue to see considerable return potential based on the underlying business characteristics of the companies in the portfolio. The companies that we own have become more attractively valued, as measured by decreased weighted average P/E and P/B ratios, now respectively at 12.9x and 1.3x. We believe that a return to "quality," as opposed to the current environment that has rewarded momentum, would mean a return to good things for Royce Total Return Fund.
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
Comdisco |
$3,085,830 |
Helix Technology |
2,997,197 |
Roper Industries |
1,655,012 |
True North Communications |
1,639,423 |
Air Express International |
1,518,173 |
Comdisco This firm has leveraged their expertise in leasing computer equipment and technology into a profitable combination of leasing information technology services, Internet access and Internet venture capital opportunities.
True North Communications The stock price of this leading advertising agency took off in the fourth quarter. The company has been a major beneficiary of the fattening advertising budgets of Internet and other high-growth companies.
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME
PXRE Group |
$1,543,040 |
Enesco Group |
1,493,748 |
Fab Industries |
1,444,117 |
Frozen Food Express Industries |
1,433,877 |
Capital Transamerica |
1,424,337 |
PXRE Group
An offshore multi-line reinsurer, the company endured a dismal 1999 as did
most of the insurance industry, as the stock price steadily declined throughout
the year. As the price dropped to lower and lower levels, we recognized a wonderful
opportunity to keep buying what we think is a solid company that will hopefully
participate in an insurance stock comeback.
Enesco Group The stock of this designer of collectible figurines and ornaments enjoyed an all-too-brief second-quarter upswing before a sharp decline in the collectibles industry began in June and lasted through the end of the year. We are holding on for now, unsure about the company's ability to get back on track.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$362 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
12.9x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
1.3x |
Weighted Average Yield |
3.4% |
Fund Net Assets |
$248 million |
Turnover Rate |
39% |
Symbol |
RYTRX |
Trenwick Group |
2.2 |
% |
Charming Shoppes |
2.2 |
|
Arrow International |
1.7 |
|
NNBall & Roller |
1.6 |
|
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
1.6 |
|
Avnet |
1.5 |
|
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
1.5 |
|
Anglogold ADR |
1.5 |
|
Zenith National Insurance |
1.5 |
|
Woodward Governor |
1.3 |
Industrial Products |
25.2 |
% |
Financial Intermediaries |
15.5 |
|
Industrial Services |
13.1 |
|
Natural Resources |
7.7 |
|
Financial Services |
6.8 |
|
Technology |
6.6 |
|
Consumer Products |
6.6 |
|
Health |
1.7 |
|
Consumer Services |
0.9 |
|
Utilities |
0.5 |
|
Miscellaneous |
4.8 |
|
Bonds & Preferred Stocks |
7.1 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
3.5 |
ROYCE TOTAL RETURN FUND
VS. RUSSELL 2000
Value of $10,000 Invested
on 12/15/93
|
RTR |
Russell 2000 |
12/15/1993 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
12/31/1993 |
10,000 |
10,354 |
03/31/1994 |
9,940 |
10,079 |
06/30/1994 |
9,960 |
9,687 |
09/30/1994 |
10,360 |
10,359 |
12/31/1994 |
10,513 |
10,166 |
03/31/1995 |
11,149 |
10,635 |
06/30/1995 |
12,010 |
11,631 |
09/30/1995 |
12,996 |
12,780 |
12/31/1995 |
13,336 |
13,058 |
03/31/1996 |
13,961 |
13,725 |
06/30/1996 |
15,234 |
14,411 |
09/30/1996 |
15,512 |
14,460 |
12/31/1996 |
16,734 |
15,212 |
03/31/1997 |
17,159 |
14,424 |
06/30/1997 |
18,861 |
16,764 |
09/30/1997 |
20,483 |
19,258 |
12/31/1997 |
20,698 |
18,613 |
03/31/1998 |
22,129 |
20,484 |
06/30/1998 |
22,212 |
19,529 |
09/30/1998 |
19,872 |
15,596 |
12/31/1998 |
21,682 |
18,140 |
03/31/1999 |
19,671 |
17,157 |
06/30/1999 |
22,095 |
19,824 |
09/30/1999 |
21,280 |
18,571 |
12/31/1999 |
22,017 |
21,997 |
Includes reinvestment
of distributions.
21 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
ROYCE LOW-PRICED STOCK FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
Through 12/31/99
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
18.5 |
% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
13.5 |
|
1-Year |
29.8 |
|
3-Year |
16.7 |
|
5-Year |
19.0 |
|
Since Inception (12/15/93) |
16.1 |
|
*Not annualized. |
MORNINGSTAR VOLATILITY MEASURES*
RLP |
Category
Median
|
Best
Quartile
Breakpoint
|
|
Standard Deviation |
22.73 |
25.72 |
20.95 |
Mstar Risk Ratio |
1.10 |
1.31 |
1.14 |
Beta |
0.66 |
1.00 |
0.82 |
*Three years ended
12/31/99. Category Median and Best Decile Breakpoint based on 289 small-cap
objective funds (lowest expense class only) with at least three years of history.
RLP |
Russell 2000 |
|
3/18/94-12/9/94 |
-2.7 |
-12.3 |
5/22/96-7/24/96 |
-10.5 |
-15.4 |
1/22/97-4/25/97 |
-4.8 |
-9.0 |
10/13/97-1/12/98 |
-9.9 |
-11.3 |
4/21/98-10/8/98 |
-31.3 |
-36.5 |
CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL RETURNS
Year |
RLP |
|
|
||
1999 |
29.8 |
% |
1998 |
2.4 |
|
1997 |
19.5 |
|
1996 |
22.8 |
|
1995 |
22.5 |
|
1994 |
3.0 |
22 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund (RLP) enjoyed a strong year in both a relative and an absolute sense. For the full year, the Fund was up 29.8%, ahead of its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000, which was up 21.3%. The Fund's average annual total return since inception (12/15/93) was 16.1%. Effective January 1, 2000, W. Whitney George became the Fund's Portfolio Manager. He has been actively involved with the Fund for several years.
In terms of quarterly performance patterns, 1999 was as odd as it was profitable. After a slow first-quarter start, RLP rebounded sharply in the second quarter, held its own in the third-quarter downturn and matched its benchmark with a strong fourth-quarter finish. Performance was historically uncharacteristic in that value typically outperforms during downdrafts and underperforms during updrafts, but in 1999's first two quarters, the opposite was true for RLP.
The Fund's investments in more volatile low-priced stocks served it well in a market that seemed to reward higher risk with higher returns. In spite of this inherent volatility, RLP attempts to invest in securities that have low leverage and strong earnings records and/or prospects. We believe that investing in a more volatile sector with a conservative approach enabled the Fund to perform well. Some major contributors to the Fund's total realized and unrealized gain can be found below.
The sector that made the greatest positive impact on the Fund's performance was Technology, followed by Consumer Services and Consumer Products. During the year, we purchased new positions in the information technology services providers CIBER and Syntel when Y2K anxiety created an earnings slowdown; a subsequent recovery came about as excellent opportunities, including e-commerce for CIBER, began to materialize. Another new technology position is Comdisco, a long-term holding in other Royce portfolios, that has successfully parlayed its expertise in the technology leasing business into new areas such as Internet access and Internet venture capital. We sold part of our position in the fourth quarter, but held on to the rest as we remain believers in the company's long-term prospects. We also sold our entire position in Helix Technology when it reached our estimate of its full value.
We initiated new positions in PAREXEL International, a contract research services provider and a leader in the growing business of pharmaceutical outsourcing whose recent reorganization makes us hopeful that it can resume its previous pattern of steady growth; Aurora Biosciences, what we believe is a well-managed drug development company; Stone & Webster, an engineering, design and construction firm whose share price plunged as the company weathered a financial crisis that has recently shown signs of abating; and Interim Services, a staffing services company that went through a rough year itself, but emerged from the successful integration of a merger with a solid balance sheet and steady business growth intact.
Although valuations for the portfolio have risen as measured by weighted average P/E and P/B ratios, we still see plenty of return potential based on the underlying fundamentals of the companies in RLP's portfolio. Looking forward, we are particularly interested in out-of-favor sectors such as energy and insurance.
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
Aurora Biosciences |
$668,628 |
Corel |
552,073 |
Comdisco |
468,386 |
Marshall Industries |
427,926 |
Helix Technology |
415,654 |
Aurora Biosciences
Both institutional interest and the stock price were low early in 1999 for
this designer and developer of systems that enhance and accelerate the discovery
of new drugs, although we were drawn by what we thought was terrific management.
Late in the year, the company attracted serious attention from Wall Street,
which led to a significant increase in the stock price.
Corel This long-troubled Canadian software designer and manufacturer seemed to struggle until the company began to produce software for use in the Linux operating systems. Shortly afterwards, growth investors could not seem to get enough of the stock, which nearly quadrupled in value during the fourth quarter.
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME
Oakley |
$300,749 |
800 JR Cigar |
197,404 |
Cornell Corrections |
177,619 |
Richardson Electronics |
167,895 |
Frozen Food Express Industries |
163,751 |
Oakley
The company continues to be the dominant force in the sunglasses business,
but its stock price was stomped on as a result of its slow start in the footwear
industry. We still have high hopes based on their strong brand name and talented
management.
800 JR Cigar A glut of premium cigars caused this mail-order distributor to miss quarterly earnings estimates and subsequently slump just like other tobacco-related companies did in 1999. We remain optimistic due to the company's low valuation and the fact that company management holds about 75% of the stock.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$400 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
14.9x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
1.4x |
Weighted Average Yield |
0.8% |
Fund Net Assets |
$25 million |
Turnover Rate |
103% |
Symbol |
RYLPX |
TOP 10 POSITIONS %
of Net Assets
Charming Shoppes |
3.2 |
% |
Richardson Electronics |
2.6 |
|
Sevenson Environmental Services |
2.5 |
|
Titan Exploration |
2.5 |
|
Morrison Knudsen |
2.5 |
|
PAREXEL International |
2.4 |
|
CIBER |
2.2 |
|
Denbury Resources |
2.2 |
|
Aurora Biosciences |
2.2 |
|
West Teleservices |
2.0 |
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN
% of Net Assets
Industrial Services |
20.8 |
% |
Technology |
20.7 |
|
Natural Resources |
13.8 |
|
Health |
10.3 |
|
Consumer Products |
7.8 |
|
Consumer Services |
7.6 |
|
Financial Intermediaries |
2.5 |
|
Financial Services |
2.1 |
|
Industrial Products |
1.8 |
|
Miscellaneous |
4.6 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
8.0 |
ROYCE LOW-PRICED STOCK FUND VS.
RUSSELL 2000
Value of $10,000 Invested on 12/15/93
|
RLP |
Russell 2000 |
12/15/1993 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
12/31/1993 |
10,020 |
10,354 |
03/31/1994 |
9,780 |
10,079 |
06/30/1994 |
9,659 |
9,687 |
09/30/1994 |
10,259 |
10,359 |
12/31/1994 |
10,319 |
10,166 |
03/31/1995 |
11,011 |
10,635 |
06/30/1995 |
12,131 |
11,631 |
09/30/1995 |
13,005 |
12,780 |
12/31/1995 |
12,644 |
13,058 |
03/31/1996 |
14,443 |
13,725 |
06/30/1996 |
15,388 |
14,411 |
09/30/1996 |
14,780 |
14,460 |
12/31/1996 |
15,526 |
15,212 |
03/31/1997 |
15,404 |
14,424 |
06/30/1997 |
16,660 |
16,764 |
09/30/1997 |
19,125 |
19,258 |
12/31/1997 |
18,550 |
18,613 |
03/31/1998 |
21,107 |
20,484 |
06/30/1998 |
21,379 |
19,529 |
09/30/1998 |
16,782 |
15,596 |
12/31/1998 |
18,989 |
18,140 |
03/31/1999 |
17,159 |
17,157 |
06/30/1999 |
21,722 |
19,824 |
09/30/1999 |
20,793 |
18,571 |
12/31/1999 |
24,644 |
21,997 |
23 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
Includes reinvestment
of distributions.
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND |
PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO REVIEW |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL
RETURNS
Through 12/31/99
Fourth Quarter 1999* |
15.3 |
% |
Jul-Dec 1999* |
14.8 |
|
1-Year |
32.3 |
|
3-Year |
18.8 |
|
Since Inception (11/19/96) |
20.0 |
*Not annualized.
MORNINGSTAR VOLATILITY MEASURES*
ROF |
Category |
Best
Quartile |
|
Standard Deviation |
23.85 |
25.72 |
20.95 |
Mstar Risk Ratio |
1.05 |
1.31 |
1.14 |
Beta |
0.73 |
1.00 |
0.82 |
*Three
years ended 12/31/99. Category Median and Best Decile Breakpoint based on 289
small-cap
objective funds (lowest expense class only) with at least three years of history.
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE
COMPARISON
All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater, in Percentages (%)
ROF |
Russell 2000 |
|
1/22/97-4/25/97 |
-1.1 |
-9.0 |
10/13/97-1/12/98 |
-10.1 |
-11.3 |
4/21/98-10/8/98 |
-33.6 |
-36.5 |
CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL RETURNS
Year |
ROF |
|
|
||
1999 |
32.3 |
% |
1998 |
4.9 |
|
1997 |
20.8 |
24 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
MANAGER'S DISCUSSION
Royce Opportunity Fund (ROF), managed by Buzz Zaino, enjoyed a strong year. ROF was up 32.3%, significantly ahead of its benchmark, the small-cap oriented Russell 2000, which was up 21.3% in 1999. The Fund's average annual total return since inception (11/19/96) was 20.0%.
More than making up for its slow first-quarter start, the Fund substantially out-performed its benchmark in the second and third quarters and then performed solidly in the fourth quarter. The Fund's more opportunistic approach, which allows us to take on relatively more risk in a portfolio of primarily small- and micro-cap stocks, was ideally suited to a market driven by the notion that more risk meant more return. The Fund benefited from its substantial weightings in technology companies, the dominant sector in 1999, as well as from some key positions in micro-cap companies, where higher risk, in the form of pricing inefficiencies and higher volatility creates the potential for higher returns. ROF's total realized and unrealized gain on investments in 1999 of $12,999,670 is a revealing indicator of its success.
Companies in the Technology sector made the greatest positive impact on the Fund's performance, with those in Industrial Products a distant second. Industry problems and market neglect kept insurance stocks in the Financial Intermediaries sector struggling for most of the year. However, their low prices also provided us with the opportunity to pick up new positions both in the reinsurer PXRE Group and the multi-line insurer WR Berkley, two companies that we think are very well managed and thus poised for a reversal of market fortunes. We also took new positions in FLIR Systems, a well-run designer and manufacturer of thermal imaging units, and two companies in the pumps, valves and bearings industry Flowserve, whose consolidating, cost-cutting management should help to improve earnings, and Commercial Intertech (currently being acquired), whose declining price during the first and fourth quarters made it an even more attractive buy.
Seven new positions were among the Fund's top-ten holdings, including Keithley Instruments, a manufacturer of semiconductor testing equipment whose low price late in 98 and early in 99 attracted our attention as it transformed its product line, paid down debt and repurchased stock; Cubic, a dual-business company that builds military simulation systems and revenue collection systems for urban mass transit systems London is a new client that we think has terrific management, excellent financial characteristics and a major share of two fast-growing, little-noticed industries; Robotic Vision Systems, a machine vision product manufacturer, whose fourth-quarter turnaround was tied to the semiconductor capital equipment business cycle; and Arch Chemicals, a specialty chemicals company with talented management that was a spin-off of Olin Corporation. Exiting the portfolio, due to substantial price appreciation, was Adaptive Broadband, previously one of the Fund's larger holdings, whose price climbed to levels well in excess of our estimate of its value, no doubt helped along by 1999's mania for all things technological.
We are very pleased with the Fund's 1999 performance, and are excited about its long-term return potential. In our view, the portfolio is well-positioned to continue to take advantage of the opportunities in the small- and micro-cap sectors.
Adaptive Broadband |
$762,576 |
Photon Dynamics |
714,544 |
Media 100 |
517,602 |
California Micro Devices |
495,246 |
Keithley Instruments |
482,668 |
Photon Dynamics A depressed price for a company with few competitors first
attracted us to this manufacturer of test equipment for the flat panel display
industry. Its business began to grow and the market followed as the company's
stock price soared during 1999's fourth quarter.
GOOD IDEAS
AT THE TIME
1999 Net Realized
and Unrealized Loss
Modtech Holdings |
$414,966 |
American Bank Note Holographics |
358,673 |
AMC Entertainment |
288,492 |
Pameco Corporation |
265,971 |
HMT Technology |
263,749 |
Modtech A 1999 turnaround failed to materialize for this modular builder because political wrangling held up a contract to build schools in California.
American Bank Note Holographics What first appeared to be a profitable and promising manufacturer of holographic financial products turned out to be a company engaging in fraudulent accounting practices. We subsequently sold our position.
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS
Median Market Cap. |
$203 million |
Weighted Average P/E Ratio |
12.9x |
Weighted Average P/B Ratio |
1.2x |
Weighted Average Yield |
0.9% |
Fund Net Assets |
$60 million |
Turnover Rate |
122% |
Symbol |
RYPNX |
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets
Bell Microproducts |
1.2% |
Keithley Instruments |
1.2 |
MSC.Software |
1.1 |
Robotic Vision Systems |
1.1 |
Cable Design Technologies |
1.0 |
Arch Chemicals |
1.0 |
Cubic |
0.9 |
ESSTechnology |
0.9 |
Precision Castparts |
0.9 |
Good Guys (The) |
0.9 |
PORTFOLIO
SECTOR BREAKDOWN
% of Net Assets
Technology |
33.5 |
% |
Industrial Products |
28.6 |
|
Industrial Services |
9.8 |
|
Consumer Services |
5.9 |
|
Natural Resources |
4.9 |
|
Consumer Products |
4.7 |
|
Health |
2.4 |
|
Financial Intermediaries |
2.0 |
|
Miscellaneous |
4.8 |
|
Bond |
0.1 |
|
Cash &Cash Equivalents |
3.3 |
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND
VS. RUSSELL 2000
Value of $10,000 Invested on 11/19/96
ROF |
Russell |
|
12/15/93 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
12/31/96 |
10,520 |
10,476 |
3/31/97 |
10,420 |
9,933 |
6/30/97 |
11,620 |
11,545 |
9/30/97 |
13,340 |
13,262 |
12/31/97 |
12,711 |
12,818 |
3/31/98 |
14,129 |
14,106 |
6/30/98 |
13,678 |
13,449 |
9/30/98 |
10,929 |
10,740 |
12/31/98 |
13,336 |
12,492 |
3/31/99 |
11,719 |
11,815 |
6/30/99 |
15,374 |
13,652 |
9/30/99 |
15,307 |
12,789 |
12/31/99 |
17,648 |
15,148 |
25 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
Includes reinvestment of distributions.
Q&A WITH CHUCK ROYCE, WHITNEY GEORGE AND JACK FOCKLER
Senior staff members Chuck Royce, Jack Fockler and Whitney George recently sat down to discuss some of the changes that have taken place in mutual fund investing. Chuck Royce has been President of Royce & Associates since 1973 and manages most of the firm's offerings. Whitney George, who joined the firm as an analyst in 1991 and became a portfolio manager in 1997, is a Vice President and Managing Director of Royce & Associates and portfolio manager of Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund. Vice President and Managing Director of Royce & Associates, Jack Fockler has worked closely with Chuck since joining the firm in 1989. Jack, Whitney and Chuck are also members of the firm's Executive Committee.
Jack: Individual stocks such as Microsoft and AOL have had extraordinary returns through the 90s. At the same time, managed account investing is no longer the exclusive province of the wealthiest institutions and individuals. Why, then, should investors buy mutual funds today?
Chuck: The classic argument in favor of mutual fund investing was to build a diversified investment portfolio by using an active manager or by investing in an index. Recently, the Internet has given individual investors access to information, trading, and order placement that they lacked five or ten years ago. It has also provided people with a greater sense of control over their money. However, these developments have not invalidated the idea that there are advantages to professional management, particularly in the small-cap world, even if this year's results and the longer-term returns of a few very successful stocks appear to have obscured its importance.
Whitney: The individual may feel that he or she is winning in the short-term, especially if they've invested in Internet stocks or those in the Nasdaq 100, but I have substantial doubts about the long-term viability of such high returns and the idea that risk doesn't need to be a primary consideration. With our approach, there is always an attempt to reduce risk, and we continue to view active professional management as having a distinct advantage over the long term. Which is not to say that owning mutual funds is mutually exclusive from owning individual stocks, only that there are important differences between the two.
Jack: Do you think that there has been a tendency among investment managers to emphasize short-term performance?
Whitney: To some degree, this is true. Money managers have to answer to shareholders and institutional clients, and no manager wants to have to explain why he or she didn't do something that they could have done. As a result, many professional investors have hopped on the momentum bandwagon to pacify and preserve their client base, even if they may not think it's the right move over the long term.
Chuck: I agree. The dream of high performance with little or no consideration of risk has affected almost everyone to a certain extent, so it's understandable that some professional investors would capitulate to the trend. We're looking like the turtles in this race because we continue to pick stocks the way we always have. Fortunately, we have very experienced managers and a solid base of informed investors in our open-and closed-end funds, as well as in our institutional business.
Jack: Chuck, when you began to manage Pennsylvania Mutual Fund in the early 70s, you weren't wed to a particular asset class or investment styleyou simply bought the stocks of companies that satisfied your own risk-averse criteria. Did the increasing professionalization and popularity of money management in the 90s have a negative effect by limiting managers to style and asset categories too rigidly? How valid are the lines that many of us draw between value and growth?
26 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
Chuck: I think it has had an unintended limiting effect, but more in terms of investment style than asset class. Many companies that we look at don't fit the classic, Ben Graham-style value mold, but they probably wouldn't be classified as growth companies, either. We try to buy cheap companies that we believe have the potential to grow, but we also pay close attention to risk factors that should give us protection against the downside. I don't really like being considered a straight-out value investor. I want to be known as a very good investor in the small-cap world, one who takes into account both risk and reward. Whether small-cap growth is doing better than value, or vice-versa, is not something that affects our day-to-day work.
Jack: Has the delineation of asset classes and investment styles created too much emphasis on relative performance and not enough on absolute?
Whitney: Unfortunately, there's no question that relative performance is the name of the game today. We've often said that you can't eat from the table of relative performance, but many investors think that a fund's investment objective is to be the top performer in its asset class every single quarter. We think our job as active managers is to deliver above-average absolute returns, adjusted for both risk and inflation. We try to accomplish this over long-term periods, usually three or more years. It's unreasonable to expect a manager to outperform in every short-term performance period. It's a nice idea, and we're certainly proud of our relative performance achievements, but that's not our goal. Short-term returns are only important insofar as they contribute to the goal of building strong absolute returns over the long term.
I want to be known as a very good investor in the small-cap world, one who takes into account both risk and reward. Whether small-cap growth is doing better than value, or vice-versa, is not something that affects our day-to-day work. |
Jack: Is it old-fashioned to talk about absolute performance when so many investors own funds in different classes with different styles and are generally just looking at the top performers in the most recent period and making their picks that way?
Chuck: It's true that many people tend to invest by looking in the rearview mirrorthey want yesterday's stellar returns today and in the future. Since this is essentially impossible, we think that investors should look instead at a fund's long-term returns and how they were achieved. They should also learn about a manager's methodology, philosophy and risk tolerance. Unfortunately, the typical investor presumes that what worked in the last few years will work in the next few. We're thrilled that some of The Royce Funds did well last year, but I certainly couldn't have predicted in 1998 which portfolios would do well in 1999. There was no way of telling that Royce Total Return Fund would have been a disappointment or that Royce Select Fund and Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund would perform so well. I'm sure that this year will have its own surprises. This takes us back to the importance of staying true to our approach over the long haul.
27 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
UPDATES AND NOTES TO PERFORMANCE AND RISK INFORMATION
FIRM UPDATES
W. Whitney George became the Portfolio Manager for Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund effective January 1, 2000. Mr. George, a Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, has been actively involved with the Fund for several years.
The Investment Classes of all of our funds are available directly through The Royce Funds. Royce Premier Fund, Royce Total Return Fund and Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund are also generally available for purchase on a no-transaction-fee basis through most mutual fund supermarkets (discount brokers). Following recent changes, other Royce Funds, including Pennsylvania Mutual Fund (PMF), Royce Micro-Cap Fund (RMC) and Royce Opportunity Fund, can be purchased through the supermarkets on a transaction-fee basis, or in the case of PMF and RMC, through full service brokers. Royce Select Fund is generally available through financial advisors, while Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund can be purchased directly through The Royce Funds and through certain brokerage firms.
Effective January 1, 2000, The Royce Funds' early redemption fee period was reduced from one year to six months. This policy, which applies to purchases made directly or through mutual fund supermarkets (discount brokers), assesses an early redemption fee of 1% to discourage short-term investing. (There are no redemption fees on Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund Investment Class, and the redemption fee period for Royce Select Fund remains at three years.)
We are pleased to report that we began the new year with no Y2K-related problems in our internal computer systems.
[GRAPHIC: Computer monitor with The Royce Funds displayed on the screen]
NEW @ www.roycefunds.com
We completed the redesign of our website in November, with a new look for our homepage and improved navigation. Please e-mail us at [email protected] and let us know what you think.
This Annual Report is available on our website in both PDF (Portable Document Format) for easy printing and HTML format for easy online reading.
NOTES TO PERFORMANCE AND RISK INFORMATIONAll performance information is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when redeemed. The Royce Funds invest primarily in securities of small-cap and/or micro-cap companies that may involve considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap companies (see "Primary Risks" in the prospectus). Historical market trends are not necessarily indicative of future market movements. There can be no assurance that securities mentioned in this report will be included in any Royce-managed portfolio in the future.
Morningstar proprietary risk ratio measures a fund's downside volatility relative to all equity funds, which have an average score of 1.00. The lower the risk ratio, the lower a fund's downside volatility has been. For the 289 funds in the small-cap objective category with a three-year history, the average Morningstar risk ratio was 1.35 for the three years ended 12/31/99. Beta is a measure of sensitivity to market movements compared to the unmanaged S&P Index, with the beta of the S&P500 equal to 1.00. A low beta means that a fund's market reflected volatility has been low. Standard deviation is a statistical measure within which a fund's total returns have varied over time. The greater the standard deviation, the greater a fund's volatility.
The Russell 2000, Russell 2000 Value, Russell 2000 Growth, Wilshire Small-cap Value, Nasdaq Composite, Nasdaq 100, Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 are unmanaged indices of domestic common stocks. The Royce Funds and Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund are service marks of The Royce Funds. Distributor: Royce Fund Services, Inc.
28 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
DECEMBER 31, 1999 |
ROYCE PREMIER FUND |
|||
COMMON STOCKS 91.1% |
|||
SHARES |
VALUE |
||
Consumer Products2.1% |
|||
Apparel and Shoes0.9% |
|||
Wolverine World Wide |
451,800 |
$ 4,941,562 |
|
|
|
||
Sports and Recreation1.2% |
|||
Oakley* |
1,191,300 |
6,626,606 |
|
|
|
||
11,568,168 |
|||
|
|
||
Consumer Services1.8% |
|||
Retail Stores1.8% |
|||
Charming Shoppes* |
1,556,800 |
10,313,800 |
|
|
|
||
Financial Intermediaries12.9% |
|||
Insurance12.9% |
|||
Commerce Group |
533,900 |
13,948,137 |
|
Erie Indemnity Company Cl. A |
299,900 |
9,709,263 |
|
Medical Assurance* |
400,190 |
8,479,026 |
|
RenaissanceRe Holdings |
209,600 |
8,567,400 |
|
Wesco Financial |
44,550 |
10,914,750 |
|
White Mountains Insurance Group |
64,600 |
7,784,300 |
|
Zenith National Insurance |
682,000 |
14,066,250 |
|
|
|
||
73,469,126 |
|||
|
|
||
Financial Services10.4% |
|||
Information and Processing2.3% |
|||
Fair, Isaac and Co. |
251,300 |
13,318,900 |
|
|
|
||
Insurance Brokers4.8% |
|||
Blanch (E.W.) Holdings |
153,800 |
9,420,250 |
|
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
272,900 |
17,670,275 |
|
|
|
||
27,090,525 |
|||
|
|
||
Investment Management3.3% |
|||
John Nuveen Company Cl. A |
216,800 |
7,818,350 |
|
Pioneer Group (The)* |
689,900 |
10,865,925 |
|
|
|
||
18,684,275 |
|||
|
|
||
59,093,700 |
|||
|
|
||
Health3.1% |
|||
Surgical Products and Devices3.1% |
|||
Haemonetics* |
746,000 |
17,764,125 |
|
|
|
||
Industrial Products13.8% |
|||
Building Systems and Components2.6% |
|||
Simpson Manufacturing* |
331,300 |
14,494,375 |
|
|
|
||
Construction Materials2.7% |
|||
Florida Rock Industries |
453,700 |
15,624,294 |
|
|
|
||
Machinery4.6% |
|||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
723,990 |
14,932,294 |
|
Nordson |
232,800 |
11,232,600 |
|
|
|
||
26,164,894 |
|||
|
|
||
Pumps, Valves and Bearings1.5% |
|||
Roper Industries |
223,500 |
8,451,094 |
|
|
|
||
Textiles2.4% |
|||
Unifi* |
1,116,700 |
13,749,369 |
|
|
|
||
78,484,026 |
|||
|
|
||
Industrial Services14.8% |
|||
Commercial Services4.6% |
|||
Interim Services* |
784,900 |
19,426,275 |
|
Shared Medical Systems |
135,000 |
6,876,562 |
|
|
|
||
26,302,837 |
|||
|
|
||
Engineering and Construction1.5% |
|||
Morrison Knudsen* |
1,093,000 |
8,539,062 |
|
|
|
||
Printing2.2% |
|||
Bowne & Co. |
381,100 |
5,144,850 |
|
New England Business Service |
298,900 |
7,304,369 |
|
|
|
||
12,449,219 |
|||
|
|
||
Transportation and Logistics6.5% |
|||
Air Express International |
475,500 |
15,364,594 |
|
C. H. Robinson Worldwide |
93,300 |
3,708,675 |
|
Circle International Group |
278,100 |
6,187,725 |
|
Expeditors International of Washington |
121,600 |
5,327,600 |
|
Pittston Brink's Group |
276,700 |
6,087,400 |
|
|
|
||
36,675,994 |
|||
|
|
||
83,967,112 |
|||
|
|
||
Natural Resources8.0% |
|||
Energy Services1.3% |
|||
Nabors Industries* |
250,100 |
7,737,469 |
|
|
|
||
Gold1.3% |
|||
Anglogold ADR+ |
280,100 |
7,195,069 |
|
|
|
||
Oil and Gas5.4% |
|||
Tom Brown* |
886,610 |
11,858,409 |
|
Devon Energy |
230,100 |
7,564,537 |
|
Renaissance Energy* |
1,113,300 |
11,183,131 |
|
|
|
||
30,606,077 |
|||
|
|
||
45,538,615 |
|||
|
|
||
Technology24.2% |
|||
Aerospace/Defense3.9% |
|||
Curtiss-Wright |
361,600 |
13,334,000 |
|
Woodward Governor |
309,556 |
8,512,790 |
|
|
|
||
21,846,790 |
|||
|
|
||
Components and Systems4.0% |
|||
Dionex* |
236,700 |
9,749,081 |
|
National Instruments* |
339,950 |
13,003,087 |
|
|
|
||
22,752,168 |
|||
|
|
||
Distribution4.5% |
|||
Arrow Electronics* |
240,200 |
6,095,075 |
|
Avnet |
318,881 |
19,292,301 |
|
|
|
||
25,387,376 |
|||
|
|
||
Semiconductors and Equipment1.3% |
|||
Dallas Semiconductor |
111,300 |
7,171,894 |
|
|
|
||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|||
29 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
|||
ROYCE PREMIER FUND (continued) |
|||
Technology (continued) |
|||
Software/Services9.4% |
|||
American Management Systems* |
177,100 |
5,556,513 |
|
CIBER* |
180,000 |
4,950,000 |
|
Comdisco |
562,600 |
20,956,850 |
|
Keane* |
140,400 |
4,457,700 |
|
National Computer Systems |
470,700 |
17,710,087 |
|
|
|
||
53,631,150 |
|||
|
|
||
Telecommunication1.1% |
|||
Plantronics* |
90,000 |
6,440,625 |
|
137,230,003 |
|||
|
|
||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
|||
(Cost $397,732,441) |
517,428,675 |
||
|
|
||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT5.8% |
|||
State Street Bank & Trust Company, 2.50%
dated 12/31/99, due 1/3/00, maturity value $32,721,816 (collateralized
by U.S. Treasury Bonds, 6.50% 8.50% due 5/15/16 11/15/26, valued
at $33,375,619) |
32,715,000 |
||
|
|
||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS96.9% |
|||
(Cost $430,447,441) |
550,143,675 |
||
CASH AND OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES3.1% |
17,689,908 |
||
|
|
||
NET ASSETS100.0% |
$567,833,583 |
||
|
|
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND
COMMON STOCKS 93.8%
SHARES |
VALUE |
|||
Consumer Products10.7% |
||||
Apparel and Shoes1.5% |
||||
North Face (The)* |
167,300 |
$ 679,656 |
||
Oshkosh B'Gosh Cl. A |
47,200 |
994,150 |
||
|
||||
1,673,806 |
||||
|
||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco0.9% |
||||
Barbeques Galore ADR+* |
20,000 |
155,000 |
||
800 JR Cigar* |
95,400 |
828,787 |
||
|
||||
983,787 |
||||
|
||||
Home Furnishing/Appliances3.3% |
||||
Bassett Furniture Industries |
45,000 |
720,000 |
||
Conso International* |
252,200 |
2,175,225 |
||
Lifetime Hoan |
127,780 |
670,845 |
||
Neutral Posture Ergonomics* |
127,200 |
166,950 |
||
|
||||
3,733,020 |
||||
|
||||
Publishing1.5% |
||||
Gibson Greetings* |
75,000 |
672,656 |
||
Marvel Enterprises* |
185,400 |
1,019,700 |
||
|
||||
1,692,356 |
||||
|
||||
Sports and Recreation1.0% |
||||
Aldila* |
348,500 |
479,188 |
||
Johnson Worldwide Associates Cl. A* |
45,250 |
320,992 |
||
Lund International Holdings* |
65,750 |
386,281 |
||
|
||||
1,186,461 |
||||
|
||||
Other Consumer Products2.5% |
||||
Lazare Kaplan International* |
243,700 |
1,980,062 |
||
Rock of Ages Cl. A* |
83,500 |
380,969 |
||
Velcro Industries |
34,100 |
411,331 |
||
|
||||
2,772,362 |
||||
|
||||
12,041,792 |
||||
|
||||
Consumer Services1.6% |
||||
Restaurants/Lodgings0.5% |
||||
Pizza Inn |
133,400 |
550,275 |
||
|
||||
Retail Stores1.1% |
||||
Mikasa |
70,000 |
704,375 |
||
Stein Mart* |
56,200 |
319,637 |
||
Urban Outfitters* |
7,900 |
230,088 |
||
|
||||
1,254,100 |
||||
|
||||
1,804,375 |
||||
|
||||
30 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
Financial Intermediaries2.5% |
||||
Banking0.3% |
||||
Bay Bancshares |
20,000 |
$357,500 |
||
|
||||
Insurance2.2% |
||||
Capitol Transamerica |
20,835 |
209,652 |
||
Highlands Insurance Group* |
63,200 |
600,400 |
||
NYMAGIC |
41,800 |
551,238 |
||
Navigators Group* |
33,600 |
336,000 |
||
Nobel Insurance* |
33,750 |
8,437 |
||
PXRE Group |
55,800 |
725,400 |
||
|
||||
2,431,127 |
||||
|
||||
2,788,627 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Services2.1% |
||||
Information and Processing1.5% |
||||
Duff & Phelps Credit Rating |
19,600 |
1,743,175 |
||
|
||||
Insurance Brokers0.4% |
||||
CorVel* |
20,000 |
470,000 |
||
|
||||
Investment Management0.2% |
||||
U.S. Global Investors Cl. A* |
137,000 |
205,500 |
||
|
||||
2,418,675 |
||||
|
||||
Health5.0% |
||||
Commercial Services3.0% |
||||
ChiRex* |
43,300 |
633,263 |
||
PAREXEL International* |
115,600 |
1,365,525 |
||
Young Innovations* |
98,100 |
1,440,844 |
||
|
||||
3,439,632 |
||||
|
||||
Drugs and Biotech1.8% |
||||
Aurora Biosciences* |
50,000 |
1,325,000 |
||
BioReliance* |
100,700 |
575,878 |
||
Cerus Corporation* |
5,000 |
132,500 |
||
|
||||
2,033,378 |
||||
|
||||
Surgical Products and Devices0.2% |
||||
Allied Healthcare Products* |
71,000 |
168,625 |
||
|
||||
5,641,635 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Products13.9% |
||||
Building Systems and Components3.4% |
||||
Falcon Products |
52,500 |
452,812 |
||
Simpson Manufacturing* |
36,200 |
1,583,750 |
||
Thor Industries |
58,800 |
1,789,725 |
||
|
||||
3,826,287 |
||||
|
||||
Construction Materials2.8% |
||||
Florida Rock Industries |
57,200 |
1,969,825 |
||
Puerto Rican Cement |
37,000 |
1,258,000 |
||
|
||||
3,227,825 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Components0.9% |
||||
Woodhead Industries |
85,800 |
997,425 |
||
|
||||
Machinery0.1% |
||||
DeVlieg-Bullard* |
570,000 |
79,800 |
||
|
||||
Paper and Packaging1.2% |
||||
PalEx* |
200,400 |
1,402,800 |
||
|
||||
Pumps, Valves and Bearings1.8% |
||||
Denison International ADR+* |
67,400 |
690,850 |
||
NN Ball & Roller |
55,700 |
403,825 |
||
Sun Hydraulics |
137,600 |
894,400 |
||
|
||||
1,989,075 |
||||
|
||||
Specialty Chemicals and Materials2.1% |
||||
CFC International* |
105,600 |
693,000 |
||
Chemfab* |
56,400 |
881,250 |
||
Hauser* |
51,300 |
160,312 |
||
Synalloy |
80,700 |
605,250 |
||
|
||||
2,339,812 |
||||
|
||||
Textiles0.3% |
||||
Fab Industries |
30,700 |
331,944 |
||
|
||||
Other Industrial Products1.3% |
||||
Aerovox* |
224,200 |
700,625 |
||
BHA Group Holdings |
74,346 |
585,475 |
||
Mestek* |
12,000 |
243,000 |
||
|
||||
1,529,100 |
||||
|
||||
15,724,068 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Services15.1% |
||||
Commercial Services5.5% |
||||
Applied Analytical Industries* |
78,700 |
718,137 |
||
Business Resource Group* |
168,400 |
894,625 |
||
Carlisle Holdings* |
172,900 |
2,074,800 |
||
Cornell Corrections* |
77,200 |
646,550 |
||
RCM Technologies* |
69,600 |
1,200,600 |
||
RemedyTemp Cl. A* |
34,200 |
649,800 |
||
|
||||
6,184,512 |
||||
|
||||
Engineering and Construction2.9% |
||||
Sevenson Environmental Services |
229,880 |
2,212,595 |
||
Stone & Webster |
67,100 |
1,128,119 |
||
|
||||
3,340,714 |
||||
|
||||
Food/Tobacco Processors0.5% |
||||
Midwest Grain Products* |
80,550 |
594,056 |
||
|
||||
Industrial Distribution0.2% |
||||
MPW Industrial Services Group* |
28,800 |
228,600 |
||
|
||||
Printing1.1% |
||||
Ennis Business Forms |
154,600 |
1,198,150 |
||
|
||||
Transportation and Logistics 4.9% |
||||
AirNet Systems* |
152,700 |
1,087,988 |
||
Circle International Group |
48,200 |
1,072,450 |
||
Forward Air* |
28,400 |
1,231,850 |
||
Frozen Food Express Industries* |
100,050 |
387,694 |
||
Kenan Transport |
34,430 |
1,091,001 |
||
Pittston BAX Group |
64,600 |
686,375 |
||
|
||||
5,557,358 |
||||
|
||||
17,103,390 |
||||
|
||||
31 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND (continued) |
||||
Natural Resources6.2% |
||||
Energy Services2.8% |
||||
Carbo Ceramics |
70,600 |
1,544,375 |
||
Dril-Quip* |
31,500 |
956,812 |
||
Input/Output* |
129,800 |
657,113 |
||
|
||||
3,158,300 |
||||
|
||||
Oil and Gas3.4% |
||||
Denbury Resources* |
211,800 |
913,387 |
||
PetroCorp* |
202,300 |
1,175,869 |
||
Titan Exploration* |
324,100 |
1,762,294 |
||
|
||||
3,851,550 |
||||
|
||||
7,009,850 |
||||
|
||||
Technology32.2% |
||||
Aerospace/Defense1.8% |
||||
Cubic |
52,900 |
1,157,187 |
||
Woodward Governor |
30,448 |
837,320 |
||
|
||||
1,994,507 |
||||
|
||||
Components and Systems10.8% |
||||
CEM* |
67,600 |
726,700 |
||
Coherent* |
46,300 |
1,238,525 |
||
Ezenia!* |
116,100 |
921,544 |
||
HMT Technology* |
154,000 |
616,000 |
||
Indigo* |
10,000 |
31,875 |
||
MOCON |
162,975 |
977,850 |
||
Newport |
21,900 |
1,001,925 |
||
PCD* |
84,500 |
570,375 |
||
Penn Engineering & Manufacturing |
29,300 |
677,562 |
||
Perceptron* |
65,000 |
260,000 |
||
Performance Technologies* |
54,250 |
942,594 |
||
Rainbow Technologies* |
103,450 |
2,405,212 |
||
SBS Technologies* |
19,700 |
719,050 |
||
Spectra-Physics Lasers* |
32,500 |
910,000 |
||
TransAct Technologies* |
33,500 |
253,344 |
||
|
||||
12,252,556 |
||||
|
||||
Distribution4.9% |
||||
Jaco Electronics* |
101,800 |
528,087 |
||
Kent Electronics* |
18,800 |
427,700 |
||
Pioneer-Standard Electronics |
151,100 |
2,181,506 |
||
Richardson Electronics |
317,000 |
2,377,500 |
||
|
||||
5,514,793 |
||||
|
||||
Semiconductors and Equipment2.1% |
||||
Electroglas* |
40,600 |
1,030,225 |
||
Exar* |
11,000 |
647,625 |
||
Veeco Instruments* |
14,600 |
683,462 |
||
|
||||
2,361,312 |
||||
|
||||
Software/Services10.1% |
||||
CCC Information Services Group* |
43,900 |
751,788 |
||
CFI ProServices* |
20,000 |
163,750 |
||
CSP* |
123,523 |
941,863 |
||
JDA Software Group* |
70,900 |
1,160,987 |
||
Kronos* |
62,700 |
3,762,000 |
||
MSC.Software* |
84,700 |
857,588 |
||
Mastech Corporation* |
51,300 |
1,269,675 |
||
New Horizons Worldwide* |
68,900 |
818,187 |
||
SPSS* |
24,800 |
626,200 |
||
Tyler Technologies* |
200,400 |
1,102,200 |
||
|
||||
11,454,238 |
||||
|
||||
Telecommunication2.5% |
||||
InterVoice-Brite* |
50,000 |
1,162,500 |
||
Quanta Services* |
5,000 |
141,250 |
||
REMEC* |
59,200 |
1,509,600 |
||
|
||||
2,813,350 |
||||
|
||||
36,390,756 |
||||
|
||||
Miscellaneous4.5% |
4,997,665 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
||||
(Cost $88,873,670) |
105,920,833 |
|||
|
||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT4.1% |
||||
State Street Bank & Trust Company, 2.50% dated 12/31/99, due 1/3/00, maturity value $4,690,977 (collateralized by U.S. Treasury Bonds, 7.25% 8.50% due 5/15/16 2/15/20, valued at $4,787,550) |
4,690,000 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS97.9% |
||||
(Cost $93,563,670) |
110,610,833 |
|||
CASH AND OTHER ASSETS |
2,358,565 |
|||
|
||||
NET ASSETS100.0% |
$112,969,398 |
|||
|
||||
32 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL
COMMON STOCKS 97.1%
SHARES |
VALUE |
|||
Consumer Products9.4% |
||||
Apparel and Shoes2.9% |
||||
Garan |
89,500 |
$ 2,561,938 |
||
K-Swiss Cl. A |
93,100 |
1,729,623 |
||
**North Face (The)* |
461,500 |
1,874,844 |
||
Oshkosh B'Gosh Cl. A |
130,100 |
2,740,231 |
||
Weyco Group |
196,600 |
5,050,162 |
||
Wolverine World Wide |
46,700 |
510,781 |
||
|
||||
14,467,579 |
||||
|
||||
Collectibles0.5% |
||||
**Department 56* |
56,700 |
1,282,838 |
||
Enesco Group |
106,400 |
1,177,050 |
||
|
||||
2,459,888 |
||||
|
||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco0.1% |
||||
**800 JR Cigar* |
78,000 |
677,625 |
||
|
||||
Home Furnishing/Appliances 1.4% |
||||
Bassett Furniture Industries |
173,575 |
2,777,200 |
||
Burnham Corporation Cl. A |
51,526 |
1,829,173 |
||
Conso International* |
41,700 |
359,662 |
||
Lifetime Hoan |
368,199 |
1,933,045 |
||
|
||||
6,899,080 |
||||
|
||||
Publishing0.5% |
||||
**Marvel Enterprises* |
419,600 |
2,307,800 |
||
|
||||
Sports and Recreation1.5% |
||||
Johnson Worldwide Associates Cl. A* |
193,970 |
1,375,975 |
||
Lund International Holdings* |
217,800 |
1,279,575 |
||
**Oakley* |
371,700 |
2,067,581 |
||
Sturm, Ruger & Co. |
325,000 |
2,884,375 |
||
|
||||
7,607,506 |
||||
|
||||
Other Consumer Products2.5% |
||||
Koala Corporation* |
33,000 |
462,000 |
||
Lazare Kaplan International* |
136,500 |
1,109,063 |
||
**Matthews International Cl. A |
138,200 |
3,800,500 |
||
Velcro Industries |
601,500 |
7,255,594 |
||
|
||||
12,627,157 |
||||
|
||||
47,046,635 |
||||
|
||||
Consumer Services3.7% |
||||
Restaurants/Lodgings0.8% |
||||
Buffets* |
404,400 |
4,044,000 |
||
|
||||
Retail Stores2.9% |
||||
Charming Shoppes* |
869,600 |
5,761,100 |
||
**Claire's Stores |
73,700 |
1,649,038 |
||
Mikasa |
202,200 |
2,034,638 |
||
**Sunglass Hut International* |
262,100 |
2,948,625 |
||
Urban Outfitters* |
75,700 |
2,204,762 |
||
|
||||
14,598,163 |
||||
|
||||
18,642,163 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Intermediaries9.7% |
||||
Banking1.9% |
||||
Baker Boyer Bancorp |
31,300 |
1,690,200 |
||
Community Banks |
65,677 |
1,502,361 |
||
F & M Bancorporation (OK) |
13,800 |
814,200 |
||
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach |
1,266 |
3,304,260 |
||
Hanmi Bank* |
27,848 |
400,315 |
||
Oriental Financial Group |
84,833 |
1,871,628 |
||
|
||||
9,582,964 |
||||
|
||||
Insurance7.8% |
||||
Alleghany Corporation* |
5,409 |
1,003,369 |
||
Argonaut Group |
31,700 |
630,038 |
||
Baldwin & Lyons Cl. B |
115,678 |
2,559,376 |
||
Berkley (W. R.) |
38,700 |
807,862 |
||
Capitol Transamerica |
163,745 |
1,647,684 |
||
Chicago Title |
40,609 |
1,878,166 |
||
Commerce Group |
92,542 |
2,417,660 |
||
Medical Assurance* |
230,909 |
4,892,384 |
||
**Mutual Risk Management |
257,900 |
4,335,944 |
||
Old Republic International |
67,300 |
916,963 |
||
PMA Capital Cl. A |
231,932 |
4,609,648 |
||
RLI |
46,681 |
1,587,154 |
||
Trenwick Group |
233,800 |
3,959,988 |
||
Wesco Financial |
13,560 |
3,322,200 |
||
Zenith National Insurance |
211,000 |
4,351,875 |
||
|
||||
38,920,311 |
||||
|
||||
48,503,275 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Services10.2% |
||||
Information and Processing3.6% |
||||
BARRA* |
78,000 |
2,476,500 |
||
Duff & Phelps Credit Rating |
87,099 |
7,746,367 |
||
Fair, Isaac and Co. |
69,100 |
3,662,300 |
||
Investors Financial Services |
85,608 |
3,937,968 |
||
|
||||
17,823,135 |
||||
|
||||
Insurance Brokers4.4% |
||||
Blanch (E.W.) Holdings |
58,000 |
3,552,500 |
||
Clark/Bardes Holdings* |
109,100 |
1,568,312 |
||
Crawford & Co. Cl. A |
386,875 |
4,400,703 |
||
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
147,500 |
9,550,625 |
||
Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton |
108,600 |
3,067,950 |
||
|
||||
22,140,090 |
||||
|
||||
Investment Management2.2% |
||||
Affiliated Managers Group* |
73,300 |
2,964,069 |
||
John Nuveen Company Cl. A |
67,800 |
2,445,037 |
||
Nvest LP |
88,800 |
1,409,700 |
||
Phoenix Investment Partners |
226,600 |
1,841,125 |
||
Pioneer Group (The)* |
161,300 |
2,540,475 |
||
|
||||
11,200,406 |
||||
|
||||
51,163,631 |
||||
|
||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||||
33 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
Health3.0% |
||||
Commercial Services0.9% |
||||
PAREXEL International* |
223,500 |
2,640,094 |
||
**Young Innovations* |
129,000 |
1,894,688 |
||
|
||||
4,534,782 |
||||
|
||||
Drugs and Biotech0.8% |
||||
BioReliance* |
92,800 |
530,700 |
||
Chiron* |
81,400 |
3,449,325 |
||
|
||||
3,980,025 |
||||
|
||||
Surgical Products and Devices1.3% |
||||
Haemonetics* |
273,400 |
6,510,337 |
||
|
||||
15,025,144 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Products16.7% |
||||
Building Systems and Components 6.0% |
||||
Falcon Products |
310,500 |
2,678,063 |
||
International Aluminum |
131,700 |
3,094,950 |
||
Kimball International Cl. B |
178,000 |
2,937,000 |
||
Liberty Homes Cl. A |
93,350 |
764,303 |
||
Liberty Homes Cl. B |
21,950 |
174,228 |
||
Preformed Line Products Company |
189,786 |
3,131,469 |
||
Simpson Manufacturing* |
179,900 |
7,870,625 |
||
Skyline |
156,800 |
3,684,800 |
||
Thor Industries |
183,100 |
5,573,106 |
||
|
||||
29,908,544 |
||||
|
||||
Construction Materials3.3% |
||||
Ash Grove Cement Company |
50,018 |
5,001,800 |
||
Ash Grove Cement Company Cl. B |
5,000 |
500,000 |
||
Florida Rock Industries |
189,900 |
6,539,681 |
||
Puerto Rican Cement |
135,600 |
4,610,400 |
||
|
||||
16,651,881 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Components0.3% |
||||
Woodhead Industries |
104,650 |
1,216,556 |
||
|
||||
Machinery1.5% |
||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
257,380 |
5,308,463 |
||
Nordson |
48,900 |
2,359,425 |
||
|
||||
7,667,888 |
||||
|
||||
Paper and Packaging1.2% |
||||
CLARCOR |
58,175 |
1,047,150 |
||
Liqui-Box |
60,800 |
3,009,600 |
||
PalEx* |
286,300 |
2,004,100 |
||
|
||||
6,060,850 |
||||
|
||||
Pumps, Valves and Bearings0.9% |
||||
Kaydon Corporation |
172,300 |
4,619,794 |
||
|
||||
Specialty Chemicals and Materials 2.2% |
||||
CFC International* |
149,200 |
979,125 |
||
Chemfab* |
74,300 |
1,160,938 |
||
Lilly Industries Cl. A |
377,861 |
5,077,507 |
||
MacDermid |
86,231 |
3,540,860 |
||
|
||||
10,758,430 |
||||
|
||||
Textiles0.5% |
||||
Fab Industries |
189,232 |
2,046,071 |
||
Unifi* |
46,300 |
570,069 |
||
|
||||
2,616,140 |
||||
|
||||
Other Industrial Products0.8% |
||||
BHA Group Holdings |
189,857 |
1,495,124 |
||
Myers Industries |
148,645 |
2,341,159 |
||
|
||||
3,836,283 |
||||
|
||||
83,336,366 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Services16.2% |
||||
Advertising/Publishing1.2% |
||||
Grey Advertising |
8,031 |
3,212,400 |
||
True North Communications |
63,300 |
2,828,719 |
||
|
||||
6,041,119 |
||||
|
||||
Commercial Services3.5% |
||||
ABM Industries |
96,600 |
1,968,225 |
||
CDI* |
57,900 |
1,396,837 |
||
**Carlisle Holdings* |
310,500 |
3,726,000 |
||
Cornell Corrections* |
102,700 |
860,113 |
||
Interim Services* |
222,600 |
5,509,350 |
||
Modis Professional Services* |
282,300 |
4,022,775 |
||
|
||||
17,483,300 |
||||
|
||||
Engineering and Construction2.4% |
||||
Danaher |
16,073 |
775,522 |
||
Morrison Knudsen* |
462,500 |
3,613,281 |
||
Sevenson Environmental Services |
234,400 |
2,256,100 |
||
Stone & Webster |
171,100 |
2,876,619 |
||
Willbros Group* |
481,950 |
2,229,019 |
||
|
||||
11,750,541 |
||||
|
||||
Food/Tobacco Processors1.5% |
||||
Farmer Bros. |
18,475 |
2,937,525 |
||
Midwest Grain Products* |
369,950 |
2,728,381 |
||
Standard Commercial |
545,521 |
1,943,419 |
||
|
||||
7,609,325 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Distribution0.2% |
||||
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers* |
42,100 |
1,168,275 |
||
Printing2.3% |
||||
Bowne & Co. |
183,300 |
2,474,550 |
||
Ennis Business Forms |
346,100 |
2,682,275 |
||
New England Business Service |
129,900 |
3,174,431 |
||
Standard Register (The) |
155,210 |
3,007,194 |
||
|
||||
11,338,450 |
||||
|
||||
Transportation and Logistics5.1% |
||||
Air Express International |
178,330 |
5,762,288 |
||
AirNet Systems* |
108,200 |
770,925 |
||
Arnold Industries |
445,048 |
6,258,488 |
||
Circle International Group |
298,874 |
6,649,947 |
||
Fritz Companies* |
59,000 |
619,500 |
||
Frozen Food Express Industries |
418,867 |
1,623,110 |
||
Kenan Transport |
76,300 |
2,417,756 |
||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||||
34 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
Pittston BAX Group |
126,300 |
1,341,937 |
||
|
||||
25,443,951 |
||||
|
||||
80,834,961 |
||||
|
||||
Natural Resources7.0% |
||||
Energy Services2.3% |
||||
**Carbo Ceramics |
164,000 |
3,587,500 |
||
Global Industries* |
109,400 |
943,575 |
||
Helmerich & Payne |
136,700 |
2,981,769 |
||
Input/Output* |
337,800 |
1,710,112 |
||
Nabors Industries* |
27,600 |
853,875 |
||
Tidewater |
32,000 |
1,152,000 |
||
|
||||
11,228,831 |
||||
|
||||
Oil and Gas4.1% |
||||
Barrett Resources* |
156,200 |
4,598,138 |
||
Tom Brown* |
325,600 |
4,354,900 |
||
Denbury Resources* |
1,254,272 |
5,409,048 |
||
Devon Energy |
107,300 |
3,527,487 |
||
PetroCorp* |
99,700 |
579,506 |
||
Titan Exploration* |
404,400 |
2,198,925 |
||
|
||||
20,668,004 |
||||
|
||||
Real Estate0.6% |
||||
Consolidated-Tomoka Land |
39,800 |
507,450 |
||
FRP Properties* |
102,500 |
2,408,750 |
||
|
||||
2,916,200 |
||||
|
||||
34,813,035 |
||||
|
||||
Technology16.7% |
||||
Aerospace/Defense2.1% |
||||
Curtiss-Wright |
185,400 |
6,836,625 |
||
Woodward Governor |
145,772 |
4,008,730 |
||
|
||||
10,845,355 |
||||
|
||||
Components and Systems4.8% |
||||
CEM* |
49,000 |
526,750 |
||
Coherent* |
149,500 |
3,999,125 |
||
Dionex* |
132,276 |
5,448,118 |
||
Ezenia!* |
98,100 |
778,669 |
||
MOCON |
73,400 |
440,400 |
||
National Instruments* |
80,250 |
3,069,562 |
||
**Newport |
44,700 |
2,045,025 |
||
PCD* |
91,100 |
614,925 |
||
Penn Engineering & Manufacturing |
210,750 |
4,873,594 |
||
Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Cl. A |
47,050 |
993,931 |
||
Perceptron* |
215,800 |
863,200 |
||
Scitex* |
25,000 |
364,062 |
||
|
||||
24,017,361 |
||||
|
||||
Distribution1.7% |
||||
Arrow Electronics* |
40,500 |
1,027,687 |
||
Avnet |
91,374 |
5,528,127 |
||
Richardson Electronics |
270,262 |
2,026,965 |
||
|
||||
8,582,779 |
||||
|
||||
Semiconductors and Equipment 3.4% |
||||
ADE* |
50,000 |
825,000 |
||
Credence Systems* |
15,400 |
1,332,100 |
||
Dallas Semiconductor |
28,400 |
1,830,025 |
||
Electroglas* |
171,100 |
4,341,663 |
||
**Exar* |
68,800 |
4,050,600 |
||
Helix Technology |
48,000 |
2,151,000 |
||
Kulicke & Soffa Industries* |
39,600 |
1,685,475 |
||
PRI Automation* |
10,000 |
671,250 |
||
|
||||
16,887,113 |
||||
|
||||
Software/Services4.1% |
||||
Cognex* |
101,200 |
3,946,800 |
||
Comdisco |
78,800 |
2,935,300 |
||
Harbinger* |
41,300 |
1,313,856 |
||
JDA Software Group* |
183,800 |
3,009,725 |
||
Kronos* |
21,900 |
1,314,000 |
||
MSC.Software* |
144,500 |
1,463,062 |
||
National Computer Systems |
166,106 |
6,249,738 |
||
**Syntel* |
25,600 |
414,400 |
||
|
||||
20,646,881 |
||||
|
||||
Telecommunication0.6% |
||||
**Plantronics* |
26,900 |
1,925,031 |
||
REMEC* |
37,800 |
963,900 |
||
|
||||
2,888,931 |
||||
|
||||
83,868,420 |
||||
|
||||
Miscellaneous4.5% |
22,623,682 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
||||
(Cost $331,886,490) |
485,857,312 |
|||
|
||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT3.1% |
||||
State Street Bank & Trust Company, 2.50% dated 12/31/99,
due 1/3/00, maturity value $15,230,172 (collateralized by U.S. Treasury
Bonds, 7.25% 8.50% due 5/15/16 2/15/20, valued at $15,539,700) |
15,227,000 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS100.2% |
||||
(Cost $347,113,490) |
501,084,312 |
|||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH |
(768,640) |
|||
|
||||
NET ASSETS100.0% |
$500,315,672 |
|||
|
||||
35 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
ROYCE SELECT FUND
COMMON STOCKS 98.3%
SHARES |
VALUE |
|||
Consumer Products6.2% |
||||
Apparel and Shoes2.9% |
||||
North Face (The)* |
70,500 |
$ 286,406 |
||
  |
|
|||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco2.0% |
||||
800 JR Cigar* |
22,600 |
196,338 |
||
|
||||
Other Consumer Products1.3% |
||||
Lazare Kaplan International* |
9,000 |
73,125 |
||
Velcro Industries |
4,300 |
51,869 |
||
|
||||
124,994 |
||||
|
||||
607,738 |
||||
|
||||
Consumer Services2.9% |
||||
Restaurants/Lodgings1.3% |
||||
Buffets* |
13,300 |
133,000 |
||
|
||||
Retail Stores1.6% |
||||
Claire's Stores |
7,000 |
156,625 |
||
|
||||
289,625 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Intermediaries16.0% |
||||
Insurance16.0% |
||||
Erie Indemnity Company Cl. A |
3,800 |
123,025 |
||
Frontier Insurance Group |
52,000 |
178,750 |
||
LaSalle Re Holdings |
19,900 |
328,350 |
||
Medical Assurance* |
14,750 |
312,516 |
||
PMA Capital Cl. A |
16,400 |
325,950 |
||
Zenith National Insurance |
15,000 |
309,375 |
||
|
||||
1,577,966 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Services2.7% |
||||
Information and Processing 2.7% |
||||
Fair, Isaac and Co. |
5,000 |
265,000 |
||
|
||||
Health6.5% |
||||
Commercial Services4.5% |
||||
Schein (Henry)* |
33,500 |
445,969 |
||
|
||||
Surgical Products and Devices 2.0% |
||||
Haemonetics* |
8,000 |
190,500 |
||
|
||||
636,469 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Products9.2% |
||||
Construction Materials1.9% |
||||
Florida Rock Industries |
5,500 |
189,406 |
||
|
||||
Machinery3.4% |
||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
13,700 |
282,562 |
||
Nordson |
1,000 |
48,250 |
||
|
||||
330,812 |
||||
|
||||
Paper and Packaging1.4% |
||||
Peak International* |
14,000 |
143,500 |
||
|
||||
Specialty Chemicals and Materials1.3% |
||||
Arch Chemicals |
6,000 |
125,625 |
||
|
||||
Other Industrial Products1.2% |
||||
BHA Group Holdings |
15,600 |
122,850 |
||
|
||||
912,193 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Services21.9% |
||||
Commercial Services5.5% |
||||
CDI* |
8,100 |
195,412 |
||
Interim Services* |
14,200 |
351,450 |
||
|
||||
546,862 |
||||
|
||||
Engineering and Construction5.9% |
||||
Morrison Knudsen* |
17,600 |
137,500 |
||
Stone & Webster |
17,000 |
285,812 |
||
Willbros Group* |
33,300 |
154,013 |
||
|
||||
577,325 |
||||
|
||||
Transportation and Logistics10.5% |
||||
Air Express International |
5,000 |
161,562 |
||
AirNet Systems* |
23,000 |
163,875 |
||
Aramex International* |
20,800 |
191,100 |
||
Circle International Group |
8,000 |
178,000 |
||
Pittston BAX Group |
32,000 |
340,000 |
||
|
||||
1,034,537 |
||||
|
||||
2,158,724 |
||||
|
||||
Natural Resources14.4% |
||||
Energy Services5.1% |
||||
Carbo Ceramics |
8,200 |
179,375 |
||
Global Industries* |
11,400 |
98,325 |
||
Input/Output* |
45,000 |
227,813 |
||
|
||||
505,513 |
||||
|
||||
Oil and Gas9.3% |
||||
Tom Brown* |
20,000 |
267,500 |
||
Denbury Resources* |
44,000 |
189,750 |
||
Titan Exploration* |
85,000 |
462,187 |
||
|
||||
919,437 |
||||
|
||||
1,424,950 |
||||
|
||||
Technology18.5% |
||||
Aerospace/Defense2.6% |
||||
Curtiss-Wright |
6,800 |
250,750 |
||
|
||||
Components and Systems1.6% |
||||
National Instruments* |
4,050 |
154,913 |
||
|
||||
Distribution9.8% |
||||
Arrow Electronics* |
7,000 |
177,625 |
||
Avnet |
4,400 |
266,200 |
||
Pioneer-Standard Electronics |
20,000 |
288,750 |
||
Richardson Electronics |
31,000 |
232,500 |
||
|
||||
965,075 |
||||
|
||||
Semiconductors and Equipment2.2% |
||||
Align-Rite International* |
10,000 |
219,375 |
||
|
||||
Telecommunication2.3% |
||||
REMEC* |
9,000 |
229,500 |
||
|
||||
1,819,613 |
||||
|
||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||||
36 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
||||
(Cost $8,146,358) |
9,692,278 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS98.3% |
||||
(Cost $8,146,358) |
9,692,278 |
|||
|
||||
CASH AND OTHER ASSETS |
165,419 |
|||
|
||||
NET ASSETS100.0% |
$9,857,697 |
|||
|
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND
COMMON STOCKS 85.6%
SHARES |
VALUE |
|||
Consumer Products8.1% |
||||
Apparel and Shoes0.9% |
||||
North Face (The)* |
41,000 |
$ 166,562 |
||
|
||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco1.5% |
||||
800 JR Cigar* |
33,500 |
291,031 |
||
|
||||
Publishing1.9% |
||||
Marvel Enterprises* |
65,000 |
357,500 |
||
|
||||
Sports and Recreation1.8% |
||||
Oakley* |
60,000 |
333,750 |
||
|
||||
Other Consumer Products2.0% |
||||
Lazare Kaplan International* |
22,800 |
185,250 |
||
Velcro Industries |
17,000 |
205,062 |
||
|
||||
390,312 |
||||
|
||||
1,539,155 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Intermediaries8.4% |
||||
Insurance8.4% |
||||
Frontier Insurance Group |
78,300 |
269,156 |
||
LaSalle Re Holdings |
23,200 |
382,800 |
||
Medical Assurance* |
24,618 |
521,594 |
||
Zenith National Insurance |
20,000 |
412,500 |
||
|
||||
1,586,050 |
||||
|
||||
Health6.9% |
||||
Commercial Services2.8% |
||||
Schein (Henry)* |
40,000 |
532,500 |
||
|
||||
Surgical Products and Devices4.1% |
||||
Arrow International |
12,500 |
362,500 |
||
Haemonetics* |
17,600 |
419,100 |
||
|
||||
781,600 |
||||
|
||||
1,314,100 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Products5.5% |
||||
Machinery2.3% |
||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
20,900 |
431,063 |
||
|
||||
Paper and Packaging1.6% |
||||
Peak International* |
29,000 |
297,250 |
||
|
||||
Specialty Chemicals and Materials0.9% |
||||
Synalloy |
22,000 |
165,000 |
||
|
||||
Other Industrial Products0.7% |
||||
BHA Group Holdings |
17,443 |
137,364 |
||
|
||||
1,030,677 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Services18.6% |
||||
Commercial Services8.5% |
||||
Interim Services* |
22,900 |
566,775 |
||
Manpower |
4,700 |
176,837 |
||
Olsten |
34,000 |
384,625 |
||
RCM Technologies* |
28,000 |
483,000 |
||
|
||||
1,611,237 |
||||
|
||||
37 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND (continued) |
||||
Industrial Services (continued) |
||||
Engineering and Construction5.0% |
||||
Morrison Knudsen* |
17,600 |
137,500 |
||
Stone & Webster |
47,800 |
803,638 |
||
|
||||
941,138 |
||||
|
||||
Transportation and Logistics5.1% |
||||
AirNet Systems* |
45,000 |
320,625 |
||
Circle International Group |
6,500 |
144,625 |
||
Pittston BAX Group |
48,000 |
510,000 |
||
|
||||
975,250 |
||||
|
||||
3,527,625 |
||||
|
||||
Natural Resources14.8% |
||||
Energy Services6.6% |
||||
Carbo Ceramics |
22,000 |
481,250 |
||
Global Industries* |
30,000 |
258,750 |
||
Input/Output* |
100,000 |
506,250 |
||
|
||||
1,246,250 |
||||
|
||||
Gold0.8% |
||||
Homestake Mining |
20,000 |
156,250 |
||
|
||||
Oil and Gas7.4% |
||||
Barrett Resources* |
4,300 |
126,581 |
||
Tom Brown* |
12,500 |
167,187 |
||
Denbury Resources* |
70,000 |
301,875 |
||
Devon Energy |
4,200 |
138,075 |
||
Titan Exploration* |
123,300 |
670,444 |
||
|
||||
1,404,162 |
||||
|
||||
2,806,662 |
||||
|
||||
Technology23.3% |
||||
Components and Systems3.1% |
||||
National Instruments* |
8,400 |
321,300 |
||
Newport |
6,000 |
274,500 |
||
|
||||
595,800 |
||||
|
||||
Distribution9.6% |
||||
Arrow Electronics* |
9,000 |
228,375 |
||
Avnet |
7,500 |
453,750 |
||
Kent Electronics* |
9,700 |
220,675 |
||
Pioneer-Standard Electronics |
30,000 |
433,125 |
||
Richardson Electronics |
63,300 |
474,750 |
||
|
||||
1,810,675 |
||||
|
||||
Semiconductors and Equipment1.1% |
||||
ESS Technology* |
9,000 |
199,688 |
||
|
||||
Software/Services7.0% |
||||
CIBER* |
15,000 |
412,500 |
||
JDA Software Group* |
20,000 |
327,500 |
||
Kronos* |
4,500 |
270,000 |
||
New Horizons Worldwide* |
26,000 |
308,750 |
||
|
||||
1,318,750 |
||||
|
||||
Telecommunication2.5% |
||||
REMEC* |
18,900 |
481,950 |
||
|
||||
4,406,863 |
||||
|
||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
||||
(Cost $13,276,256) |
16,211,132 |
|||
|
||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT11.7% |
||||
State Street Bank & Trust Company, 2.50% dated 12/31/99, due 1/3/00,
maturity value $2,223,463 (collateralized by U.S. Treasury Bonds, 8.00%
14.00% due 11/15/11 11/15/21, valued at $2,271,869) |
2,223,000 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS97.3% |
||||
(Cost $15,499,256) |
18,434,132 |
|||
CASH AND OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES2.7% |
508,841 |
|||
|
||||
NET ASSETS100% |
$18,942,973 |
|||
|
||||
38 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
ROYCE TOTAL RETURN FUND
COMMON STOCKS 89.4%
SHARES |
VALUE |
||||
Consumer Products6.6% |
|||||
Apparel and Shoes1.4% |
|||||
Garan |
49,600 |
$ 1,419,800 |
|||
Oshkosh B'Gosh Cl. A |
41,100 |
865,669 |
|||
Wolverine World Wide |
115,000 |
1,257,812 |
|||
|
|||||
3,543,281 |
|||||
|
|||||
Collectibles0.8% |
|||||
Enesco Group |
169,400 |
1,873,988 |
|||
|
|||||
Home Furnishing/Appliances2.1% |
|||||
Bassett Furniture Industries |
166,700 |
2,667,200 |
|||
Flexsteel Industries |
175,500 |
2,347,312 |
|||
Lifetime Hoan |
43,570 |
228,743 |
|||
|
|||||
5,243,255 |
|||||
|
|||||
Sports and Recreation1.0% |
|||||
Sturm, Ruger & Co. |
283,000 |
2,511,625 |
|||
|
|||||
Other Consumer Products1.3% |
|||||
Velcro Industries |
222,000 |
2,677,875 |
|||
WD-40 |
18,400 |
407,100 |
|||
|
|||||
3,084,975 |
|||||
|
|||||
16,257,124 |
|||||
|
|||||
Consumer Services0.9% |
|||||
Retail Stores0.9% |
|||||
Claire's Stores |
48,000 |
1,074,000 |
|||
Mikasa |
111,900 |
1,125,994 |
|||
|
|||||
2,199,994 |
|||||
|
|||||
Financial Intermediaries15.5% |
|||||
Banking0.4% |
|||||
Bank of the Ozarks |
17,500 |
341,250 |
|||
Texas Regional Bancshares Cl. A |
20,000 |
580,000 |
|||
|
|||||
921,250 |
|||||
|
|||||
Insurance15.0% |
|||||
Argonaut Group |
112,200 |
2,229,975 |
|||
Berkley (W. R.) |
88,000 |
1,837,000 |
|||
Capitol Transamerica |
182,800 |
1,839,425 |
|||
Chicago Title |
48,800 |
2,257,000 |
|||
Commerce Group |
64,100 |
1,674,612 |
|||
Erie Indemnity Company Cl. A |
79,000 |
2,557,625 |
|||
LandAmerica Financial Group |
75,600 |
1,389,150 |
|||
LaSalle Re Holdings |
34,900 |
575,850 |
|||
Mutual Risk Management |
98,000 |
1,647,625 |
|||
NYMAGIC |
134,300 |
1,771,081 |
|||
Nationwide Financial Services Cl. A |
45,000 |
1,257,188 |
|||
Old Republic International |
120,000 |
1,635,000 |
|||
PMA Capital Cl. A |
152,580 |
3,032,527 |
|||
PXRE Group |
171,424 |
2,228,512 |
|||
Trenwick Group |
326,860 |
5,536,191 |
|||
White Mountains Insurance Group |
18,500 |
2,229,250 |
|||
Zenith National Insurance |
178,800 |
3,687,750 |
|||
|
|||||
37,385,761 |
|||||
|
|||||
Securities Brokers0.1% |
|||||
Legg Mason |
9,666 |
350,393 |
|||
|
|||||
38,657,404 |
|||||
|
|||||
Financial Services6.8% |
|||||
Information and Processing0.3% |
|||||
Duff & Phelps Credit Rating |
8,000 |
711,500 |
|||
|
|||||
Insurance Brokers3.1% |
|||||
Aon |
45,000 |
1,800,000 |
|||
Crawford & Co. Cl. A |
202,700 |
2,305,712 |
|||
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
58,400 |
3,781,400 |
|||
|
|||||
7,887,112 |
|||||
|
|||||
Investment Management3.4% |
|||||
Alliance Capital Management Holding L.P. |
37,000 |
1,107,688 |
|||
John Nuveen Company Cl. A |
87,900 |
3,169,894 |
|||
Mackenzie Financial |
101,400 |
1,254,825 |
|||
Phoenix Investment Partners |
354,000 |
2,876,250 |
|||
|
|||||
8,408,657 |
|||||
|
|||||
17,007,269 |
|||||
|
|||||
Health1.7% |
|||||
Surgical Products and Devices1.7% |
|||||
Arrow International |
143,200 |
4,152,800 |
|||
|
|||||
Industrial Products25.2% |
|||||
Building Systems and Components4.1% |
|||||
Falcon Products |
178,300 |
1,537,837 |
|||
Fleetwood Enterprises |
47,000 |
969,375 |
|||
International Aluminum |
50,000 |
1,175,000 |
|||
Kimball International Cl. B |
100,200 |
1,653,300 |
|||
++Mueller (Paul) |
59,500 |
1,718,063 |
|||
Skyline |
40,000 |
940,000 |
|||
Thor Industries |
75,000 |
2,282,812 |
|||
|
|||||
10,276,387 |
|||||
|
|||||
Construction Materials4.4% |
|||||
Ameron International |
20,500 |
811,031 |
|||
Ash Grove Cement Company |
610 |
61,000 |
|||
Ash Grove Cement Company Cl. B |
27,000 |
2,700,000 |
|||
Florida Rock Industries |
85,000 |
2,927,188 |
|||
Oregon Steel Mills |
272,900 |
2,166,144 |
|||
Puerto Rican Cement |
68,600 |
2,332,400 |
|||
|
|||||
10,997,763 |
|||||
|
|||||
Industrial Components0.9% |
|||||
Woodhead Industries |
184,100 |
2,140,162 |
|||
|
|||||
Machinery3.1% |
|||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
188,300 |
3,883,688 |
|||
Minuteman International |
143,000 |
1,304,875 |
|||
Nordson |
51,300 |
2,475,225 |
|||
|
|||||
7,663,788 |
|||||
|
|||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|||||
39 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
|||||
ROYCE TOTAL RETURN FUND (continued) |
|||||
Industrial Products (continued) |
|||||
Paper and Packaging0.4% |
|||||
Peak TRENDS Trust |
128,400 |
1,107,450 |
|||
|
|||||
Pumps, Valves and Bearings4.4% |
|||||
Franklin Electric |
22,900 |
1,607,294 |
|||
Kaydon Corporation |
30,000 |
804,375 |
|||
NN Ball & Roller |
549,900 |
3,986,775 |
|||
Roper Industries |
56,500 |
2,136,406 |
|||
Sun Hydraulics |
304,550 |
1,979,575 |
|||
Tech/Ops Sevcon |
43,700 |
437,000 |
|||
|
|||||
10,951,425 |
|||||
|
|||||
Specialty Chemicals and Materials4.8% |
|||||
Arch Chemicals |
122,500 |
2,564,844 |
|||
Brady (W.H.) Cl. A |
78,700 |
2,670,881 |
|||
Calgon Carbon |
144,000 |
855,000 |
|||
Lilly Industries Cl. A |
100,000 |
1,343,750 |
|||
MacDermid |
40,000 |
1,642,500 |
|||
Regal-Beloit |
30,000 |
618,750 |
|||
Synalloy |
295,000 |
2,212,500 |
|||
|
|||||
11,908,225 |
|||||
|
|||||
Textiles0.6% |
|||||
Fab Industries |
130,100 |
1,406,706 |
|||
|
|||||
Other Industrial Products2.5% |
|||||
BHA Group Holdings |
222,829 |
1,754,778 |
|||
Baldor Electric |
100,000 |
1,812,500 |
|||
Landauer |
49,600 |
1,085,000 |
|||
Myers Industries |
34,870 |
549,202 |
|||
Tennant |
30,000 |
982,500 |
|||
|
|||||
6,183,980 |
|||||
|
|||||
62,635,886 |
|||||
|
|||||
Industrial Services13.1% |
|||||
Advertising/Publishing1.0% |
|||||
True North Communications |
56,000 |
2,502,500 |
|||
|
|||||
Commercial Services3.4% |
|||||
ABM Industries |
134,800 |
2,746,550 |
|||
Angelica |
86,700 |
845,325 |
|||
Hardinge |
136,400 |
1,781,725 |
|||
Manpower |
18,400 |
692,300 |
|||
Shared Medical Systems |
18,000 |
916,875 |
|||
Superior Uniform Group |
164,200 |
1,477,800 |
|||
|
|||||
8,460,575 |
|||||
|
|||||
Engineering and Construction0.4% |
|||||
Sevenson Environmental Services |
96,960 |
933,240 |
|||
|
|||||
Food/Tobacco Processors1.6% |
|||||
DIMON |
612,200 |
1,989,650 |
|||
Universal |
85,000 |
1,939,063 |
|||
|
|||||
3,928,713 |
|||||
|
|||||
Industrial Distribution1.0% |
|||||
Central Steel & Wire |
3,898 |
2,377,780 |
|||
|
|||||
Printing1.0% |
|||||
Ennis Business Forms |
311,500 |
2,414,125 |
|||
New England Business Service |
10,000 |
244,375 |
|||
|
|||||
2,658,500 |
|||||
|
|||||
Transportation and Logistics4.7% |
|||||
Airborne Freight |
52,500 |
1,155,000 |
|||
Arnold Industries |
202,800 |
2,851,875 |
|||
Circle International Group |
126,400 |
2,812,400 |
|||
Frozen Food Express Industries* |
456,635 |
1,769,461 |
|||
Pittston BAX Group |
288,800 |
3,068,500 |
|||
|
|||||
11,657,236 |
|||||
|
|||||
32,518,544 |
|||||
|
|||||
Natural Resources7.7% |
|||||
Energy Services3.0% |
|||||
Carbo Ceramics |
124,000 |
2,712,500 |
|||
Helmerich & Payne |
121,100 |
2,641,494 |
|||
Lufkin Industries |
67,700 |
1,015,500 |
|||
Tidewater |
29,000 |
1,044,000 |
|||
|
|||||
7,413,494 |
|||||
|
|||||
Gold1.5% |
|||||
Anglogold ADR+ |
143,600 |
3,688,725 |
|||
|
|||||
Oil and Gas1.4% |
|||||
Devon Energy |
65,100 |
2,140,162 |
|||
Titan Exploration* |
231,100 |
1,256,606 |
|||
|
|||||
3,396,768 |
|||||
|
|||||
Real Estate1.8% |
|||||
Chelsea GCA Realty |
98,500 |
2,930,375 |
|||
Redwood Trust |
5,000 |
62,500 |
|||
Thornburg Mortgage Asset |
115,000 |
948,750 |
|||
Vornado Realty Trust |
20,000 |
650,000 |
|||
|
|||||
4,591,625 |
|||||
|
|||||
19,090,612 |
|||||
|
|||||
Technology6.6% |
|||||
Aerospace/Defense2.5% |
|||||
Curtiss-Wright |
76,800 |
2,832,000 |
|||
Woodward Governor |
120,100 |
3,302,750 |
|||
|
|||||
6,134,750 |
|||||
|
|||||
Components and Systems0.8% |
|||||
Innovex |
30,000 |
281,250 |
|||
Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Cl. A |
78,600 |
1,660,425 |
|||
|
|||||
1,941,675 |
|||||
|
|||||
Distribution2.0% |
|||||
Avnet |
63,200 |
3,823,600 |
|||
Richardson Electronics |
164,400 |
1,233,000 |
|||
|
|||||
5,056,600 |
|||||
|
|||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|||||
40 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
|||||
Technology (continued) |
|||||
Software/Services0.7% |
|||||
Comdisco |
50,100 |
1,866,225 |
|||
|
|||||
Telecommunication0.6% |
|||||
Communications Systems |
89,000 |
1,157,000 |
|||
|
|||||
FirstWorld Communications |
|||||
(Warrants)* |
3,500 |
350,000 |
|||
|
|||||
1,507,000 |
|||||
|
|||||
16,506,250 |
|||||
|
|||||
Utilities0.5% |
|||||
EnergySouth |
11,950 |
247,963 |
|||
NUI |
35,000 |
923,125 |
|||
|
|||||
1,171,088 |
|||||
|
|||||
Miscellaneous4.8% |
11,898,870 |
||||
|
|||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
|||||
(Cost $233,550,936) |
222,095,841 |
||||
|
|||||
PREFERRED STOCKS1.3% |
|||||
Fleetwood Capital Trust 6.00% Conv. |
50,000 |
1,625,000 |
|||
Frontier Financing Trust 6.25% Conv. |
50,000 |
850,000 |
|||
Vornado Realty Trust 6.50% Conv. |
15,000 |
699,375 |
|||
|
|||||
TOTAL PREFERRED STOCKS |
|||||
(Cost $3,766,406) |
3,174,375 |
||||
|
|||||
PRINCIPAL |
VALUE |
||||
CORPORATE BONDS5.8% |
|||||
Charming Shoppes 7.50% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Note due 7/15/06 |
$5,250,000 |
$5,355,000 |
|||
Credence Systems 5.25% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Note due 9/15/02 |
1,000,000 |
1,362,500 |
|||
Cymer 3.50% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Note due 8/06/04 |
1,000,000 |
1,107,500 |
|||
FirstWorld Communications 0% |
|||||
(Step)*** Sr. Note due 4/15/08 |
3,500,000 |
1,925,000 |
|||
HMT Technology 5.75% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Note due 1/15/04 |
2,750,000 |
1,086,250 |
|||
Richardson Electronics 8.25% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Deb. due 6/15/06 |
1,657,000 |
1,325,600 |
|||
Standard Commercial 7.25% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Deb. due 3/31/07 |
500,000 |
241,250 |
|||
Sunglass Hut International 5.25% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Note due 6/15/03 |
1,750,000 |
1,428,437 |
|||
System Software Associates 7.00% |
|||||
Conv. Sub. Note due 9/15/02 |
2,449,000 |
743,884 |
|||
|
|||||
TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS |
|||||
(Cost $14,716,380) |
14,575,421 |
||||
|
|||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT2.7% |
|||||
State Street Bank & Trust Company, 2.50% dated 12/31/99, due 1/3/00,
maturity value $6,659,387 (collateralized by U.S. Treasury Bonds, 7.25%
8.50% due 5/15/16 2/15/20, valued at $6,798,600) |
6,658,000 |
||||
|
|||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS99.2% |
|||||
(Cost $258,691,722) |
246,503,637 |
||||
CASH AND OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES0.8% |
1,944,330 |
||||
|
|||||
NET ASSETS100.0% |
$248,447,967 |
||||
|
|||||
41 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
|||||
ROYCE LOW-PRICED STOCK FUND
COMMON STOCKS 92.0%
SHARES |
VALUE |
|||
Consumer Products7.8% |
||||
Collectibles2.0% |
||||
Enesco Group |
45,000 |
$ 497,813 |
||
|
||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco1.5% |
||||
800 JR Cigar* |
42,900 |
372,694 |
||
|
||||
Publishing2.5% |
||||
Gibson Greetings* |
48,300 |
433,191 |
||
Topps Company (The)* |
16,800 |
174,300 |
||
|
||||
607,491 |
||||
|
||||
Sports and Recreation1.8% |
||||
Oakley* |
80,000 |
445,000 |
||
|
||||
1,922,998 |
||||
|
||||
Consumer Services7.6% |
||||
Restaurants/Lodgings1.7% |
||||
Buffets* |
40,400 |
404,000 |
||
|
||||
Retail Stores5.9% |
||||
Charming Shoppes* |
119,600 |
792,350 |
||
Claire's Stores |
15,000 |
335,625 |
||
Finish Line (The) Cl. A* |
60,500 |
328,969 |
||
|
||||
1,456,944 |
||||
|
||||
1,860,944 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Intermediaries2.5% |
||||
Insurance2.5% |
||||
HCC Insurance Holdings |
20,000 |
263,750 |
||
Trenwick Group |
20,000 |
338,750 |
||
|
||||
602,500 |
||||
|
||||
Financial Services2.1% |
||||
Investment Management2.1% |
||||
Phoenix Investment Partners |
17,900 |
145,437 |
||
Pioneer Group (The)* |
23,700 |
373,275 |
||
|
||||
518,712 |
||||
|
||||
Health10.3% |
||||
Commercial Services5.8% |
||||
Analysts International |
27,500 |
343,750 |
||
PAREXEL International* |
50,000 |
590,625 |
||
Schein (Henry)* |
20,000 |
266,250 |
||
Young Innovations* |
15,000 |
220,312 |
||
|
||||
1,420,937 |
||||
|
||||
Drugs and Biotech4.5% |
||||
Aurora Biosciences* |
20,000 |
530,000 |
||
Dura Pharmaceuticals* |
20,000 |
278,750 |
||
Liposome Company (The)* |
25,000 |
305,078 |
||
|
||||
1,113,828 |
||||
|
||||
2,534,765 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Products1.8% |
||||
Textiles1.8% |
||||
Unifi* |
34,900 |
429,706 |
||
|
||||
Industrial Services20.8% |
||||
Commercial Services7.2% |
||||
Applied Analytical Industries* |
40,000 |
365,000 |
||
Carlisle Holdings* |
20,000 |
240,000 |
||
Cornell Corrections* |
35,000 |
293,125 |
||
Interim Services* |
20,000 |
495,000 |
||
RemedyTemp Cl. A* |
20,000 |
380,000 |
||
|
||||
1,773,125 |
||||
|
||||
Engineering and Construction7.6% |
||||
McDermott International |
25,000 |
226,563 |
||
Morrison Knudsen* |
77,300 |
603,906 |
||
Sevenson Environmental Services |
63,660 |
612,727 |
||
Stone & Webster |
25,000 |
420,313 |
||
|
||||
1,863,509 |
||||
|
||||
Printing1.9% |
||||
Bowne & Co. |
20,000 |
270,000 |
||
Ennis Business Forms |
25,000 |
193,750 |
||
|
||||
463,750 |
||||
|
||||
Transportation and Logistics4.1% |
||||
AirNet Systems* |
52,900 |
376,912 |
||
Arnold Industries |
26,200 |
368,438 |
||
Knight Transportation* |
15,000 |
256,875 |
||
|
||||
1,002,225 |
||||
|
||||
5,102,609 |
||||
|
||||
Natural Resources13.8% |
||||
Energy Services3.5% |
||||
Global Industries* |
45,000 |
388,125 |
||
Input/Output* |
95,000 |
480,937 |
||
|
||||
869,062 |
||||
|
||||
Gold1.6% |
||||
Homestake Mining |
50,000 |
390,625 |
||
|
||||
Oil and Gas8.7% |
||||
Tom Brown* |
33,000 |
441,375 |
||
Denbury Resources* |
125,000 |
539,063 |
||
IRI International* |
60,000 |
240,000 |
||
Renaissance Energy* |
30,000 |
301,351 |
||
Titan Exploration* |
112,300 |
610,631 |
||
|
||||
2,132,420 |
||||
|
||||
3,392,107 |
||||
|
||||
Technology20.7% |
||||
Distribution2.6% |
||||
Richardson Electronics |
85,700 |
642,750 |
||
|
||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||||
42 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
Technology (continued) |
||||
Semiconductors and Equipment2.4% |
||||
ESS Technology* |
15,000 |
332,812 |
||
Silicon Valley Group* |
15,000 |
266,250 |
||
|
||||
599,062 |
||||
|
||||
Software/Services10.5% |
||||
Aspen Technology* |
5,000 |
132,188 |
||
CSP* |
20,000 |
152,500 |
||
CIBER* |
20,000 |
550,000 |
||
Comdisco |
9,900 |
368,775 |
||
Informix* |
20,000 |
228,750 |
||
JDA Software Group* |
30,100 |
492,887 |
||
Syntel* |
30,000 |
485,625 |
||
Tyler Technologies* |
30,000 |
165,000 |
||
|
||||
2,575,725 |
||||
|
||||
Telecommunication5.2% |
||||
Globecomm Systems* |
15,000 |
378,750 |
||
REMEC* |
15,400 |
392,700 |
||
West Teleservices* |
20,400 |
498,525 |
||
|
||||
1,269,975 |
||||
|
||||
5,087,512 |
||||
|
||||
Miscellaneous4.6% |
1,122,275 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
||||
(Cost $19,606,242) |
22,574,128 |
|||
|
||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 6.3% |
||||
State Street Bank & Trust Company, 2.50% dated 12/31/99, due 1/3/00,
maturity value $1,553,324 (collateralized by U.S. Treasury Bonds, 8.50%
14.00% due 11/15/11 2/15/20, valued at $1,589,944) |
1,553,000 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS98.3% |
||||
(Cost $21,159,242) |
24,127,128 |
|||
CASH AND OTHER ASSETS |
403,160 |
|||
|
||||
NET ASSETS100.0% |
$24,530,288 |
|||
|
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND
COMMON STOCKS 96.6%
SHARES |
VALUE |
|||
Consumer Products4.7% |
||||
Apparel and Shoes1.7% |
||||
Burlington Industries* |
66,400 |
$ 265,600 |
||
Donna Karan International* |
69,700 |
457,406 |
||
Warnaco Group (The) |
25,000 |
307,813 |
||
|
||||
1,030,819 |
||||
|
||||
Collectibles0.5% |
||||
Enesco Group |
29,500 |
326,344 |
||
|
||||
Publishing1.2% |
||||
Houghton Mifflin |
12,000 |
506,250 |
||
Topps Company (The)* |
22,300 |
231,362 |
||
|
||||
737,612 |
||||
|
||||
Other Consumer Products1.3% |
||||
Cross (A. T.) & Company Cl. A* |
54,800 |
246,600 |
||
Jostens |
5,000 |
121,562 |
||
Velcro Industries |
34,200 |
412,538 |
||
|
||||
780,700 |
||||
|
||||
2,875,475 |
||||
|
||||
Consumer Services5.9% |
||||
Direct Marketing0.5% |
||||
Spiegel Cl. A* |
43,200 |
303,750 |
||
|
||||
Leisure/Entertainment1.1% |
||||
AMC Entertainment* |
43,000 |
370,875 |
||
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer* |
12,000 |
282,750 |
||
|
||||
653,625 |
||||
|
||||
Restaurants/Lodgings0.5% |
||||
Cooker Restaurant |
58,200 |
167,325 |
||
Piccadilly Cafeterias |
35,500 |
142,000 |
||
|
||||
309,325 |
||||
|
||||
Retail Stores3.8% |
||||
Bombay Company (The)* |
67,500 |
303,750 |
||
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse |
23,000 |
319,125 |
||
Elder-Beerman Stores* |
41,500 |
212,688 |
||
Fred's |
31,800 |
506,812 |
||
Good Guys (The)* |
58,000 |
540,125 |
||
Noodle Kidoodle* |
51,800 |
246,050 |
||
Phar-Mor* |
68,000 |
187,000 |
||
|
||||
2,315,550 |
||||
|
||||
3,582,250 |
||||
|
||||
43 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND (continued) |
||||
Financial Intermediaries2.0% |
||||
Banking0.9% |
||||
East West Bancorp |
47,000 |
537,562 |
||
|
||||
Insurance1.1% |
||||
Berkley (W. R.) |
16,000 |
334,000 |
||
PXRE Group |
25,000 |
325,000 |
||
|
||||
659,000 |
||||
|
||||
1,196,562 |
||||
|
||||
Health2.4% |
||||
Drugs and Biotech0.6% |
||||
QuadraMed* |
40,500 |
353,109 |
||
|
||||
Consumer Health Services0.2% |
||||
Balanced Care* |
87,300 |
114,581 |
||
|
||||
Personal Care0.9% |
||||
Herbalife International Cl. A |
20,000 |
287,500 |
||
Weider Nutrition International |
75,000 |
276,562 |
||
|
||||
564,062 |
||||
|
||||
Surgical Products and Devices0.7% |
||||
Varian Medical Systems* |
15,200 |
453,150 |
||
|
||||
1,484,902 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Products28.6% |
||||
Building Systems and Components1.7% |
||||
Aztec Manufacturing |
29,900 |
366,275 |
||
Pameco Corporation* |
58,600 |
238,063 |
||
The Shaw Group* |
15,500 |
392,344 |
||
|
||||
996,682 |
||||
|
||||
Construction Materials1.7% |
||||
Foster (L.B.) Cl. A* |
55,700 |
271,537 |
||
Huttig Building Products* |
89,100 |
439,931 |
||
Lamson & Sessions* |
32,800 |
159,900 |
||
Northwest Pipe* |
12,000 |
168,000 |
||
|
||||
1,039,368 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial Components4.5% |
||||
ACX Technologies* |
30,000 |
320,625 |
||
Cable Design Technologies* |
27,500 |
632,500 |
||
DT Industries |
59,000 |
464,625 |
||
Flowserve |
30,500 |
518,500 |
||
Gundle/SLT Environmental* |
60,200 |
210,700 |
||
LeCroy* |
15,800 |
193,550 |
||
Woodhead Industries |
29,000 |
337,125 |
||
|
||||
2,677,625 |
||||
|
||||
Industrial OEM0.7% |
||||
Smith (A.O.)* |
18,800 |
411,250 |
||
|
||||
Machinery7.7% |
||||
Atchison Casting* |
41,500 |
378,688 |
||
CMI Cl. A |
63,000 |
444,938 |
||
Chart Industries |
74,900 |
299,600 |
||
Commercial Intertech |
38,200 |
487,050 |
||
ESCO Electronics* |
36,000 |
418,500 |
||
GSI Lumonics* |
50,100 |
438,375 |
||
Hurco Companies* |
56,300 |
197,050 |
||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
20,000 |
412,500 |
||
MTS Systems |
35,900 |
278,225 |
||
Osmonics* |
43,000 |
395,062 |
||
Precision Castparts |
21,200 |
556,500 |
||
UNOVA* |
28,000 |
364,000 |
||
|
||||
4,670,488 |
||||
|
||||
Paper and Packaging2.2% |
||||
Applied Extrusion Technologies* |
65,300 |
399,963 |
||
Longview Fibre |
29,600 |
421,800 |
||
Peak International* |
49,100 |
503,275 |
||
|
||||
1,325,038 |
||||
|
||||
Pumps, Valves and Bearings0.5% |
||||
NN Ball & Roller |
42,000 |
304,500 |
||
|
||||
Specialty Chemicals and Materials5.9% |
||||
Albany International Cl. A* |
29,826 |
462,303 |
||
Arch Chemicals |
29,500 |
617,656 |
||
Calgon Carbon |
25,000 |
148,437 |
||
Carpenter Technology |
14,900 |
408,819 |
||
Deswell Industries |
30,500 |
472,750 |
||
Lydall* |
48,300 |
319,987 |
||
NL Industries |
13,200 |
198,825 |
||
Rogers* |
14,000 |
535,500 |
||
Sheldahl* |
51,100 |
220,369 |
||
Sybron Chemicals* |
17,600 |
206,800 |
||
|
||||
3,591,446 |
||||
|
||||
Textiles0.2% |
||||
Cone Mills* |
28,200 |
126,900 |
||
|
||||
Other Industrial Products3.5% |
||||
FLIR Systems* |
30,000 |
487,500 |
||
Fansteel* |
52,300 |
202,663 |
||
Griffon* |
52,700 |
411,719 |
||
Integral Vision* |
39,300 |
83,512 |
||
Kaman Corporation Cl. A |
24,500 |
315,438 |
||
Maxwell Technologies* |
16,600 |
166,000 |
||
Stewart & Stevenson Services |
36,000 |
426,375 |
||
|
||||
2,093,207 |
||||
|
||||
17,236,504 |
||||
|
||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||||
44 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
Industrial Services9.8% |
||||
Advertising/Publishing0.9% |
||||
True North Communications |
12,000 |
536,250 |
||
|
||||
Commercial Services2.3% |
||||
AAR Corporation |
16,400 |
294,175 |
||
Alexander & Baldwin |
12,500 |
285,156 |
||
Ogden Corporation |
36,300 |
433,331 |
||
Volt Information Sciences* |
16,000 |
382,000 |
||
|
||||
1,394,662 |
||||
|
||||
Engineering and Construction1.0% |
||||
Modtech Holdings* |
54,800 |
328,800 |
||
Weston (Roy F.) Cl. A* |
55,200 |
113,850 |
||
Willbros Group* |
36,600 |
169,275 |
||
|
||||
611,925 |
||||
|
||||
Food/Tobacco Processors0.3% |
||||
Midwest Grain Products* |
25,000 |
184,375 |
||
|
||||
Industrial Distribution0.9% |
||||
Del Global Technologies* |
36,000 |
279,000 |
||
Lawson Products |
10,000 |
231,250 |
||
|
||||
510,250 |
||||
|
||||
Printing0.8% |
||||
Bowne & Co. |
37,000 |
499,500 |
||
|
||||
Transportation and Logistics3.6% |
||||
Arkansas Best* |
23,900 |
286,800 |
||
Circle International Group |
14,500 |
322,625 |
||
Fritz Companies* |
44,000 |
462,000 |
||
Genesee & Wyoming Cl. A* |
30,000 |
386,250 |
||
Mesa Air Group* |
60,000 |
285,000 |
||
OMI Corporation* |
61,500 |
126,844 |
||
Sea Containers Cl. A |
11,000 |
292,875 |
||
|
||||
2,162,394 |
||||
|
||||
5,899,356 |
||||
|
||||
Natural Resources4.9% |
||||
Energy Services0.6% |
||||
Pride International* |
25,000 |
365,625 |
||
|
||||
Metals and Mining1.7% |
||||
Brush Wellman |
25,000 |
420,313 |
||
Century Aluminum |
16,700 |
250,500 |
||
Cleveland-Cliffs |
10,000 |
311,250 |
||
|
||||
982,063 |
||||
|
||||
Oil and Gas2.1% |
||||
Tom Brown* |
14,100 |
188,587 |
||
Forest Oil* |
30,900 |
407,494 |
||
Patina Oil & Gas |
48,900 |
421,763 |
||
Santa Fe Snyder* |
32,325 |
258,600 |
||
|
||||
1,276,444 |
||||
|
||||
Other Natural Resources0.5% |
||||
Cadiz* |
33,000 |
313,500 |
||
|
||||
2,937,632 |
||||
|
||||
Technology33.5% |
||||
Aerospace/Defense2.5% |
||||
Cubic |
25,600 |
560,000 |
||
DRS Technologies* |
51,000 |
497,250 |
||
Hawker Pacific Aerospace* |
61,200 |
443,700 |
||
|
||||
1,500,950 |
||||
|
||||
Components and Systems8.7% |
||||
Auspex Systems* |
40,400 |
414,100 |
||
Boca Research* |
41,800 |
276,925 |
||
Chyron* |
97,200 |
145,800 |
||
Ciprico* |
18,700 |
216,219 |
||
Dot Hill Systems* |
70,600 |
348,588 |
||
Exabyte* |
48,000 |
360,000 |
||
HMT Technology* |
25,000 |
100,000 |
||
Innovex |
21,500 |
201,562 |
||
Keithley Instruments |
35,000 |
713,125 |
||
Mentor Graphics* |
15,000 |
197,813 |
||
Newport |
5,000 |
228,750 |
||
PSC* |
57,900 |
427,012 |
||
Penn Engineering & Manufacturing |
20,000 |
462,500 |
||
Robotic Vision Systems* |
70,100 |
648,425 |
||
SBS Technologies* |
14,000 |
511,000 |
||
|
||||
5,251,819 |
||||
|
||||
Distribution3.5% |
||||
Bell Industries |
40,600 |
301,962 |
||
Bell Microproducts* |
65,000 |
715,000 |
||
Kent Electronics* |
3,100 |
70,525 |
||
Pioneer-Standard Electronics |
25,000 |
360,938 |
||
Richardson Electronics |
34,700 |
260,250 |
||
Ultrak* |
55,900 |
433,225 |
||
|
||||
2,141,900 |
||||
|
||||
Semiconductors and Equipment7.0% |
||||
California Micro Devices* |
44,600 |
524,050 |
||
Cirrus Logic* |
31,000 |
412,687 |
||
ESS Technology* |
25,100 |
556,906 |
||
FSI International* |
37,500 |
431,250 |
||
International Rectifier* |
4,000 |
104,000 |
||
MEMC Electronic Materials* |
30,000 |
367,500 |
||
Microsemi* |
45,700 |
405,588 |
||
S3 Incorporated* |
18,800 |
217,375 |
||
Sigma Designs* |
28,800 |
316,800 |
||
Silicon Valley Group* |
25,800 |
457,950 |
||
White Electronic Designs* |
88,200 |
418,950 |
||
|
||||
4,213,056 |
||||
|
||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||||
45 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999 |
||||
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND (continued) |
||||
Technology (continued) |
||||
Software/Services7.6% |
||||
Benchmark Electronics* |
18,300 |
419,756 |
||
Carreker-Antinori* |
44,000 |
398,750 |
||
Computer Horizons* |
27,600 |
446,775 |
||
Epicor Software* |
65,000 |
329,062 |
||
Evans & Sutherland Computer* |
35,000 |
400,313 |
||
MSC.Software* |
66,700 |
675,337 |
||
Merix* |
40,000 |
440,000 |
||
Network Equipment Technologies* |
36,500 |
431,156 |
||
Phoenix Technologies* |
33,500 |
529,719 |
||
Planar Systems* |
48,900 |
323,963 |
||
SCB Computer Technology* |
70,900 |
221,562 |
||
|
||||
4,616,393 |
||||
|
||||
Telecommunication4.2% |
||||
Allen Telecom* |
44,100 |
509,906 |
||
Comtech Telecommunications* |
15,000 |
221,250 |
||
General DataComm Industries* |
48,300 |
319,988 |
||
Spectrian* |
8,900 |
251,425 |
||
Symmetricom* |
47,500 |
472,031 |
||
Watkins-Johnson |
9,700 |
388,000 |
||
Westell Technologies Cl. A* |
34,000 |
365,500 |
||
|
||||
2,528,100 |
||||
|
||||
20,252,218 |
||||
|
||||
Miscellaneous4.8% |
$2,893,895 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
||||
(Cost $51,716,375) |
58,358,794 |
|||
|
||||
CORPORATE BOND0.1% |
||||
System Software Associates 7.00% Conv. Sub. Note due 9/15/02, principal
amount $200,000 |
60,750 |
|||
|
||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT2.2% |
||||
State Street Bank & Trust Company, 2.50% dated 12/31/99, due 1/3/00,
maturity value $1,326,276 (collateralized by U.S. Treasury Bonds, 7.25%
14.00% due 11/15/11 5/15/16, valued at $1,362,569) |
1,326,000 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS98.9% |
||||
(Cost $53,133,875) |
59,745,544 |
|||
CASH AND OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES1.1% |
653,123 |
|||
|
||||
NET ASSETS100.0% |
$60,398,667 |
|||
|
+ American Depository Receipt.
++ At December 31, 1999, the Fund owned 5% or more of the Company's outstanding voting securities thereby making the Company an Affiliated Company as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
** A portion of these securities were on loan at December 31, 1999. Total market value of all securities on loan at December 31, 1999 was $8,578,789, for which the Fund had received $8,820,524 as collateral.
*** Coupon rate of 0% to 4/2003; thereafter 13%.
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS46 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
DECEMBER 31, 1999 |
Royce |
Royce |
Pennsylvania |
Royce |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments at value* |
$ |
517,428,675 |
$ |
105,920,833 |
$ |
485,857,312 |
$ |
9,692,278 |
||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) |
32,715,000 |
4,690,000 |
15,227,000 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
|
38 |
|
551,572 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral from brokers on securities loaned |
|
|
8,820,524 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable for investments sold |
18,860,480 |
2,554,729 |
411,500 |
364,038 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable for capital shares sold |
907,027 |
63,256 |
35,422 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable for dividends and interest |
480,310 |
35,326 |
682,105 |
5,810 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
20,405 |
5,110 |
20,970 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
570,411,897 |
113,269,292 |
511,054,833 |
10,613,698 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for collateral on securities loaned |
|
|
8,820,524 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for investments purchased |
1,567,327 |
86,801 |
777,650 |
523,394 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed |
324,490 |
25,927 |
407,642 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for investment advisory fees |
466,885 |
104,629 |
343,203 |
232,607 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
219,612 |
82,537 |
390,142 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
2,578,314 |
299,894 |
10,739,161 |
756,001 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets |
$ |
567,833,583 |
$ |
112,969,398 |
$ |
500,315,672 |
$ |
9,857,697 |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undistributed net investment income |
$ |
310,193 |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain on investments |
10,192,736 |
5,460,467 |
36,902,756 |
146,722 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
119,696,234 |
17,047,163 |
153,970,822 |
1,545,920 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital shares |
59,397 |
11,888 |
68,715 |
70 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
437,575,023 |
90,449,880 |
309,373,379 |
8,164,985 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets |
$ |
567,833,583 |
$ |
112,969,398 |
$ |
500,315,672 |
$ |
9,857,697 |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
$ |
567,833,583 |
$ |
111,806,167 |
$ |
371,054,788 |
$ |
9,857,697 |
||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
$ |
1,163,231 |
$ |
129,260,884 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares authorized for each Fund) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
59,397,055 |
11,764,615 |
50,966,500 |
69,893 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
123,110 |
17,748,162 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Net Assets / Shares Outstanding) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class (1) |
$ |
9.56 |
$ |
9.50 |
$ |
7.28 |
$ |
141.04 |
||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class (2) |
$ | $ |
9.45 |
$ |
7.28 |
$ | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Investments at identified cost |
$ |
397,732,441 |
$ |
88,873,670 |
$ |
331,886,490 |
$ |
8,146,358 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Royce Trust & |
Royce |
Royce |
Royce |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments at value* |
$ |
16,211,132 |
$ |
239,845,637 |
$ |
22,574,128 |
$ |
58,419,544 |
||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) |
2,223,000 |
6,658,000 |
1,553,000 |
1,326,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
121 |
146 |
186 |
751 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral from brokers on securities loaned |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable for investments sold |
748,009 |
1,199,811 |
73,350 |
705,841 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable for capital shares sold |
279,200 |
1,032,247 |
356,500 |
596,101 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable for dividends and interest |
6,965 |
848,463 |
16,963 |
32,517 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
4,113 |
9,317 |
722 |
10,654 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
19,472,540 |
249,593,621 |
24,574,849 |
61,091,408 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for collateral on securities loaned |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for investments purchased |
488,942 |
162,625 |
|
578,273 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed |
|
639,070 |
322 |
26,592 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Payable for investment advisory fees |
11,707 |
201,176 |
19,001 |
46,859 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
28,918 |
142,783 |
25,238 |
41,017 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
529,567 |
1,145,654 |
44,561 |
692,741 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets |
$ |
18,942,973 |
$ |
248,447,967 |
$ |
24,530,288 |
$ |
60,398,667 |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undistributed net investment income |
$ |
|
$ |
341,112 |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain on investments |
1,571,993 |
7,975,913 |
1,750,904 |
4,040,769 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) |
2,934,876 |
(12,188,012) |
2,967,886 |
6,611,669 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital shares |
1,881 |
34,764 |
3,007 |
8,399 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
14,434,223 |
252,284,190 |
19,808,491 |
49,737,830 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets |
$ |
18,942,973 |
$ |
248,447,967 |
$ |
24,530,288 |
$ |
60,398,667 |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
$ |
15,474,275 |
$ |
248,447,967 |
$ |
24,530,288 |
$ |
60,398,667 |
||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
$ |
3,468,698 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares authorized for each Fund) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
1,531,383 |
34,764,337 |
3,006,952 |
8,399,082 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
349,977 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Net Assets / Shares Outstanding) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class (1) |
$ |
10.10 |
$ |
7.15 |
$ |
8.16 |
$ |
7.19 |
||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class (2) |
$ |
9.91 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Investments at identified cost |
$ |
13,276,256 |
$ |
252,033,722 |
$ |
19,606,242 |
$ |
51,807,875 |
||||||||||||||||
|
(1) Offering and redemption price per share; shares redeemed within six months
of purchase are subject to a 1% redemption fee, payable to the Fund (2% for
Royce Select Fund within three years of purchase, N/A for Royce Trust &
GiftShares Fund).
(2) Offering and redemption price per share; redemption price per share is equal to NAV, less applicable deferred sales charge.
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
47 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royce
Premier Fund
|
Royce
Micro-Cap Fund
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
ended December 31,
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$
|
623,449 |
$
|
3,026,370 |
$
|
(918,186 |
)
|
$
|
(1,077,422 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
35,201,455 |
16,476,014 |
13,613,347 |
11,052,305 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments |
23,616,241 |
15,256,788 |
(1,349,281 |
) |
(17,036,282 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease)
in net assets from |
59,441,145 |
34,759,172 |
11,345,880 |
(7,061,399 |
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(559,042 |
)
|
(3,095,427 |
)
|
|
(72,742 |
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|
(293 |
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(32,917,955 |
)
|
(5,571,075 |
)
|
(2,442,694 |
) |
(9,504,473 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(14,421 |
)
|
(44,548 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions |
(33,476,997 |
)
|
(8,666,502 |
)
|
(2,457,115 |
)
|
(9,622,056 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
209,759,206 |
221,957,563 |
40,224,271 |
55,074,780 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
876,925 |
925,930 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
32,606,628 |
8,428,754 |
2,385,304 |
9,270,159 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
13,976 |
39,659 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(269,484,982 |
)
|
(220,631,891 |
)
|
(104,983,480 |
)
|
(81,986,610 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(607,065 |
)
|
(106,404 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease)
in net assets from |
(27,119,148 |
)
|
9,754,426 |
(62,090,069 |
)
|
(16,782,486 |
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS |
(1,155,000 |
)
|
35,847,096 |
(53,201,304 |
)
|
(33,465,941 |
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSETS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
568,988,583 |
533,141,487 |
166,170,702 |
199,636,643 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of period |
$
|
567,833,583 |
$
|
568,988,583 |
$
|
112,969,398 |
$
|
166,170,702 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
UNDISTRIBUTED NET
INVESTMENT INCOME |
$
|
310,193 |
$
|
297,955 |
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (IN SHARES): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
23,316,380 |
24,809,013 |
4,833,895 |
5,872,063 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
106,795 |
96,259 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
3,643,201 |
963,284 |
266,252 |
1,138,769 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
1,568 |
4,902 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(29,796,842 |
)
|
(24,840,814 |
)
|
(12,677,352 |
)
|
(8,912,344 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(73,655 |
)
|
(12,759 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(2,837,261 |
)
|
931,483 |
(7,577,205 |
)
|
(1,901,512 |
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
34,708 |
88,402 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania
Mutual Fund
|
Royce
Select Fund
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
ended December 31,
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
1999 |
|
1998(a) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$
|
1,730,855 |
$
|
2,847,051 |
$
|
(198,784 |
)
|
$
|
582 |
||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
74,551,017 |
67,731,907 |
626,805 |
26,721 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments |
(49,966,971 |
)
|
(43,310,982 |
)
|
1,494,250 |
51,670 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease)
in net assets from |
26,314,901 |
27,267,976 |
1,922,271 |
78,973 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(2,134,230 |
)
|
(2,894,969 |
)
|
|
(601 |
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(24,038,046 |
)
|
(41,174,076 |
)
|
(308,001 |
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(7,297,352 |
)
|
(12,374,251 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions |
(33,469,628 |
)
|
(56,443,296 |
)
|
(308,001 |
)
|
(601 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
110,144,607 |
131,448,215 |
6,959,269 |
1,011,000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
8,441,698 |
4,633,372 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
24,614,377 |
41,415,445 |
215,515 |
601 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
6,960,350 |
11,840,244 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(224,864,326 |
)
|
(192,077,698 |
)
|
(21,330 |
)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(24,725,094 |
)
|
(20,768,837 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease)
in net assets from |
(99,428,388 |
)
|
(23,509,259 |
)
|
7,153,454 |
1,011,601 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS |
(106,583,115 |
)
|
(52,684,579 |
)
|
8,767,724 |
1,089,973 |
|||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSETS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
606,898,787 |
659,583,366 |
1,089,973 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of period |
$
|
500,315,672 |
$
|
606,898,787 |
$
|
9,857,697 |
$
|
1,089,973 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
UNDISTRIBUTED NET
INVESTMENT INCOME |
$
|
|
$
|
50,325 |
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (IN SHARES): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
15,393,095 |
16,866,770 |
58,314 |
10,106 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
1,161,060 |
579,570 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
3,506,321 |
5,899,787 |
1,625 |
6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
991,503 |
1,686,598 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(31,484,752 |
)
|
(24,138,522 |
)
|
(158 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(3,475,881 |
)
|
(2,651,359 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(12,585,336 |
)
|
(1,371,965 |
)
|
59,781 |
10,112 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(1,323,318 |
)
|
(385,191 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(a) Royce Select Fund commenced operations on November 18, 1998.
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
48 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royce
Trust & GiftShares Fund
|
Royce
Total Return Fund
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
ended December 31,
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$
|
(95,958 |
)
|
$
|
(28,802 |
)
|
$
|
5,841,476 |
$
|
4,629,697 |
|||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
3,337,654 |
585,011 |
9,427,902 |
15,482,353 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized
appreciation |
1,906,238 |
730,213 |
(13,140,078 |
)
|
(10,546,575 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net
assets from investment |
5,147,934 |
1,286,422 |
2,129,300 |
9,565,475 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
|
|
(5,500,364 |
)
|
(4,676,552 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(1,839,807 |
)
|
(13,608 |
)
|
(11,884,623 |
)
|
(4,986,404 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(381,924 |
)
|
(2,159 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions |
(2,221,731 |
)
|
(15,767 |
)
|
(17,384,987 |
)
|
(9,662,956 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
2,803,572 |
3,728,172 |
174,904,937 |
224,193,061 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
1,382,324 |
1,021,791 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
1,839,613 |
13,603 |
16,150,461 |
8,855,052 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
379,837 |
2,136 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(43,597 |
)
|
(57,930 |
)
|
(172,341,101 |
)
|
(108,407,737 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(39,171 |
)
|
(5,398 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net
assets from capital share |
6,322,578 |
4,702,374 |
18,714,297 |
124,640,376 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS |
9,248,781 |
5,973,029 |
3,458,610 |
124,542,895 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSETS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
9,694,192 |
3,721,163 |
244,989,357 |
120,446,462 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of period |
$
|
18,942,973 |
$
|
9,694,192 |
$
|
248,447,967 |
$
|
244,989,357 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
UNDISTRIBUTED NET
INVESTMENT INCOME |
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
341,112 |
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (IN SHARES): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
316,220 |
503,437 |
23,846,182 |
29,334,388 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
156,335 |
141,588 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
198,448 |
1,753 |
2,304,373 |
1,199,870 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
41,741 |
278 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(4,453 |
)
|
(7,319 |
)
|
(23,809,533 |
)
|
(14,135,279 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
(4,840 |
)
|
(692 |
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
510,215 |
497,871 |
2,341,022 |
16,398,979 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
193,236 |
141,174 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royce
Low-Priced Stock Fund
|
Royce
Opportunity Fund
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year
ended December 31,
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$
|
(96,152 |
)
|
$
|
(22,279 |
)
|
$
|
(28,090 |
)
|
$
|
(44,314 |
) | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
3,043,498 |
1,031,027 |
8,130,158 |
1,597,782 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized
appreciation |
2,355,583 |
(925,593 |
)
|
4,869,512 |
(373,765 |
) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net
assets from investment |
5,302,929 |
83,155 |
12,971,580 |
1,179,703 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(2,139,524 |
)
|
(95,688 |
)
|
(5,264,466 |
)
|
(933,562 |
) | |||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions |
(2,139,524 |
)
|
(95,688 |
)
|
(5,264,466 |
)
|
(933,562 |
) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
9,773,106 |
14,794,912 |
34,020,800 |
15,585,247 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
2,116,496 |
94,106 |
5,105,827 |
891,292 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(11,696,326 |
)
|
(11,799,296 |
)
|
(20,712,759 |
)
|
(4,688,495 |
) | |||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net
assets from capital share |
193,276 |
3,089,722 |
18,413,868 |
11,788,044 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS |
3,356,681 |
3,077,189 |
26,120,982 |
12,034,185 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSETS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
21,173,607 |
18,096,418 |
34,277,685 |
22,243,500 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of period |
$
|
24,530,288 |
$
|
21,173,607 |
$
|
60,398,667 |
$
|
34,277,685 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
UNDISTRIBUTED NET
INVESTMENT INCOME |
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (IN SHARES): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares sold |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
1,284,856 |
2,009,166 |
5,125,146 |
2,584,105 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued for reinvestment of distributions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
282,226 |
14,237 |
745,409 |
156,949 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares redeemed |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(1,606,069 |
)
|
(1,632,413 |
)
|
(3,162,986 |
)
|
(808,098 |
) | |||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Class |
(38,987 |
)
|
390,990 |
2,707,569 |
1,932,956 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consultant Class |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
49 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royce
|
Royce
|
Pennsylvania
|
Royce
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
$ |
6,176,326 |
$ |
822,173 |
$ |
7,466,379 |
$ |
33,823 |
|||||||||||||||||
Interest |
1,167,030 |
143,867 |
873,108 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Income |
7,343,356 |
966,040 |
8,339,487 |
33,823 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fees |
5,464,280 |
1,885,554 |
4,287,443 |
271,352 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution feesInvestment Class |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution feesConsultant Class |
|
11,242 |
1,284,073 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder servicingInvestment Class |
380,060 |
119,766 |
301,628 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder servicingConsultant Class |
|
7,852 |
57,982 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder reportsInvestment Class |
257,710 |
93,582 |
253,622 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder reportsConsultant Class |
|
2,116 |
81,726 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Administrative and office facilities |
254,147 |
68,895 |
267,369 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Custodian |
111,708 |
74,842 |
127,321 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Trustees' fees |
86,476 |
20,950 |
87,872 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Audit |
37,325 |
20,725 |
46,900 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
RegistrationInvestment Class |
31,453 |
21,962 |
18,804 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
RegistrationConsultant Class |
|
4,917 |
10,500 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Legal |
30,336 |
8,007 |
34,846 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
66,412 |
20,556 |
69,564 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Expenses |
6,719,907 |
2,360,966 |
6,929,650 |
271,352 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Fees Waived by Investment
Adviser |
|
(464,060) |
(321,018) |
(38,745) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses Reimbursed
by Investment |
|
(12,680) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Expenses |
6,719,907 |
1,884,226 |
6,608,632 |
232,607 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
623,449 |
(918,186) |
1,730,855 |
(198,784) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
35,201,455 |
13,613,347 |
74,551,017 |
626,805 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized
appreciation |
23,616,241 |
(1,349,281) |
(49,966,971) |
1,494,250 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized
gain (loss) |
58,817,696 |
12,264,066 |
24,584,046 |
2,121,055 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN
NET |
$ |
59,441,145 |
$ |
11,345,880 |
$ |
26,314,901 |
$ |
1,922,271 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royce
Trust & |
Royce |
Royce |
Royce |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
$ |
83,210 |
$ |
6,695,418 |
$ |
156,342 |
$ |
527,033 |
|||||||||||||||||
Interest |
29,004 |
2,299,926 |
42,031 |
61,559 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Income |
112,214 |
8,995,344 |
198,373 |
588,592 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fees |
126,080 |
2,523,095 |
296,501 |
421,670 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution feesInvestment Class |
26,442 |
|
49,417 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution feesConsultant Class |
20,312 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder servicingInvestment Class |
10,847 |
270,284 |
20,855 |
23,290 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder servicingConsultant Class |
7,897 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder reportsInvestment Class |
23,073 |
178,547 |
11,773 |
17,370 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder reportsConsultant Class |
5,897 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Administrative and office facilities |
4,728 |
110,930 |
9,125 |
16,472 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Custodian |
18,167 |
80,974 |
26,349 |
88,586 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Trustees' fees |
1,828 |
40,110 |
3,045 |
6,137 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Audit |
19,175 |
22,825 |
14,450 |
16,175 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RegistrationInvestment Class |
14,268 |
35,240 |
15,083 |
15,245 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
RegistrationConsultant Class |
9,925 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Legal |
921 |
13,450 |
1,086 |
2,018 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
6,219 |
25,575 |
3,450 |
9,719 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Expenses |
295,779 |
3,301,030 |
451,134 |
616,682 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Fees Waived by Investment
Adviser |
(74,169) |
(147,162) |
(156,609) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses Reimbursed
by Investment |
(13,438) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Expenses |
208,172 |
3,153,868 |
294,525 |
616,682 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
(95,958) |
5,841,476 |
(96,152) |
(28,090 |
) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
3,337,654 |
9,427,902 |
3,043,498 |
8,130,158 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized
appreciation |
1,906,238 |
(13,140,078) |
2,355,583 |
4,869,512 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized
gain (loss) |
5,243,892 |
(3,712,176) |
5,399,081 |
12,999,670 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN
NET |
$ |
5,147,934 |
$ |
2,129,300 |
$ |
5,302,929 |
$ |
12,971,580 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
50 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments |
Total from Investment Operations |
Distributions from Net Investment Income |
Distribution from Net Realized Gain on Investments |
Total Distributions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE PREMIER FUND |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 9.14 |
$0.01 |
$ 1.00 |
$ 1.01 |
$(0.01) |
$(0.58) |
$(0.59) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
8.70 |
0.05 |
0.53 |
0.58 |
(0.05) |
(0.09) |
(0.14) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
7.81 |
0.09 |
1.35 |
1.44 |
(0.09) |
(0.46) |
(0.55) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
7.12 |
0.10 |
1.18 |
1.28 |
(0.10) |
(0.49) |
(0.59) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
6.48 |
0.10 |
1.05 |
1.15 |
(0.09) |
(0.42) |
(0.51) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND INVESTMENT CLASS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 8.55 |
$(0.08) |
$ 1.24 |
$ 1.16 |
$ |
$(0.21) |
$(0.21) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
9.40 |
(0.05) |
(0.29) |
(0.34) |
(0.01) |
(0.50) |
(0.51) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
8.14 |
|
2.01 |
2.01 |
|
(0.75) |
(0.75) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
7.53 |
(0.01) |
1.17 |
1.16 |
|
(0.55) |
(0.55) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
6.48 |
|
1.24 |
1.24 |
|
(0.19) |
(0.19) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND CONSULTANT CLASS (a) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 8.50 |
$(0.16) |
$ 1.23 |
$ 1.07 |
$ |
$(0.12) |
$(0.12) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
10.58 |
(0.07) |
(1.50) |
(1.57) |
(0.01) |
(0.50) |
(0.51) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT CLASS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 7.35 |
$0.04 |
$ 0.38 |
$ 0.42 |
$(0.04) |
$(0.45) |
$(0.49) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
7.82 |
0.05 |
0.24 |
0.29 |
(0.05) |
(0.71) |
(0.76) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
7.11 |
0.07 |
1.70 |
1.77 |
(0.06) |
(1.00) |
(1.06) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
7.71 |
0.11 |
0.84 |
0.95 |
(0.11) |
(1.44) |
(1.55) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
7.41 |
0.11 |
1.27 |
1.38 |
(0.11) |
(0.97) |
(1.08) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL FUND CONSULTANT CLASS (b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 7.34 |
$(0.02) |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.37 |
$ |
$(0.43) |
$(0.43) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
7.81 |
(0.01) |
0.24 |
0.23 |
|
(0.70) |
(0.70) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
7.90 |
0.02 |
0.93 |
0.95 |
(0.04) |
(1.00) |
(1.04) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE SELECT FUND (c) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$107.79 |
$(2.84) |
$40.71 |
$37.87 |
$ |
$(4.62) |
$(4.62) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
100.00 |
0.06 |
7.79 |
7.85 |
(0.06) |
|
(0.06) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return |
Net
Assets, |
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (d) |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE PREMIER FUND |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 9.56 |
11.5% |
$567,834 |
1.23% |
0.11% |
48% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
9.14 |
6.7% |
568,989 |
1.23% |
0.55% |
46% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
8.70 |
18.4% |
533,141 |
1.24% |
1.20% |
18% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
7.81 |
18.1% |
317,024 |
1.25% |
1.25% |
34% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
7.12 |
17.8% |
302,239 |
1.25% |
1.48% |
39% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND INVESTMENT CLASS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 9.50 |
13.7% |
$111,806 |
1.49% |
(0.72)% |
24% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
8.55 |
(3.3)% |
165,420 |
1.49% |
(0.57)% |
56% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
9.40 |
24.7% |
199,637 |
1.49% |
0.04% |
38% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
8.14 |
15.5% |
141,329 |
1.79% |
(0.20)% |
70% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
7.53 |
19.1% |
97,729 |
1.94% |
0.10% |
25% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE MICRO-CAP FUND CONSULTANT CLASS (a) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 9.45 |
12.7% |
$ 1,163 |
2.49% |
(1.71)% |
24% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
8.50 |
(14.6)% |
751 |
2.49%* |
(1.62)%* |
56% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT CLASS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 7.28 |
6.0% |
$371,055 |
1.04% |
0.49% |
21% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
7.35 |
4.2% |
466,857 |
1.01% |
0.62% |
29% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
7.82 |
25.0% |
507,635 |
1.05% |
0.88% |
18% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
7.11 |
12.8% |
456,868 |
0.99% |
1.05% |
29% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
7.71 |
18.7% |
630,119 |
0.98% |
1.18% |
10% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PENNSYLVANIA MUTUAL FUND CONSULTANT CLASS (b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$ 7.28 |
5.3% |
$129,261 |
1.77% |
(0.24)% |
21% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
7.34 |
3.4% |
140,042 |
1.74% |
(0.11)% |
29% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
7.81 |
12.0% |
151,948 |
1.65%* |
0.29%* |
18% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE SELECT FUND (c) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
$141.04 |
35.4% |
$ 9,858 |
4.61% |
(3.94)% |
136% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
107.79 |
7.9% |
1,090 |
0.00% |
0.50%* |
27% |
(a) The Class commenced operations on May 4, 1998.
(b) The Class commenced operations on June 18, 1997.
(c) The Fund commenced operations on November 18, 1998.
(d) Expense ratios are shown net of fee waivers and expense reimbursements by the adviser and/or the distributor, as applicable. Expense ratios for each period before the waivers and reimbursements would have been: 1.28% in 1996 for Royce Premier Fund; 1.86%, 1.81%, 1.80%, 1.87% and 1.97% in 1999 to 1995, respectively, for Royce Micro-Cap Fund-Investment Class; 3.99% and 4.52% in 1999 and 1998, respectively, for Royce Micro-Cap Fund-Consultant Class; 1.03% and 0.99% in 1996 and 1995, respectively, for Pennsylvania Mutual Fund-Investment Class; 2.02%, 1.99% and 2.00% in 1999 to 1997, respectively, for Pennsylvania Mutual Fund-Consultant Class; and 5.38% and 1.03% in 1999 and 1998, respectively, for Royce Select Fund.
* Annualized.
51 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
Net Investment Income (Loss) |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments |
Total from Investment Operations |
Distributions from Net Investment Income |
Distributions from Net Realized Gain on Investments |
Total Distributions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND INVESTMENT CLASS (a) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
$8.24 |
|
|
$(0.04) |
|
|
$3.35 |
|
|
$3.31 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$(1.45) |
|
|
$(1.45) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
1998 |
6.91 |
(0.02) |
1.37 |
1.35 |
|
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
5.83 |
(0.01) |
1.52 |
1.51 |
|
(0.43) |
(0.43) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
5.01 |
|
1.27 |
1.27 |
|
(0.45) |
(0.45) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
5.00 |
|
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND CONSULTANT CLASS (b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
$8.14 |
|
|
$(0.09) |
|
|
$3.25 |
|
|
$3.16 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$(1.39) |
|
|
$(1.39) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
6.88 |
(0.06) |
1.34 |
1.28 |
|
(0.02) |
(0.02) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
7.21 |
(0.01) |
0.11 |
0.10 |
|
(0.43) |
(0.43) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE TOTAL RETURN FUND |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
$7.56 |
|
|
$0.17 |
|
|
$(0.07) |
|
|
$0.10 |
|
|
$ (0.16) |
|
|
$(0.35) |
|
|
$(0.51) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
7.52 |
0.15 |
0.20 |
0.35 |
(0.15) |
(0.16) |
(0.31) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
6.29 |
0.11 |
1.38 |
1.49 |
(0.11) |
(0.15) |
(0.26) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
5.76 |
0.14 |
1.28 |
1.42 |
(0.16) |
(0.73) |
(0.89) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
5.12 |
0.13 |
1.24 |
1.37 |
(0.13) |
(0.60) |
(0.73) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE LOW-PRICED STOCK FUND |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
$6.95 |
|
|
$(0.03) |
|
|
$2.03 |
|
|
$2.00 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$(0.79) |
|
|
$(0.79) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
6.82 |
(0.01) |
0.17 |
0.16 |
|
(0.03) |
(0.03) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
6.30 |
(0.03) |
1.26 |
1.23 |
|
(0.71) |
(0.71) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
5.62 |
(0.03) |
1.31 |
1.28 |
|
(0.60) |
(0.60) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
5.07 |
(0.04) |
1.18 |
1.14 |
|
(0.59) |
(0.59) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND (c) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
$6.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$1.91 |
|
|
$1.91 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$(0.74) |
|
|
$(0.74) |
|
||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
5.92 |
(0.01) |
0.29 |
0.28 |
|
(0.18) |
(0.18) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
5.26 |
0.07 |
1.03 |
1.10 |
(0.08) |
(0.36) |
(0.44) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
5.00 |
|
0.26 |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period |
Total Return |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) |
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets (d) |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets |
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND INVESTMENT CLASS (a) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
|
$10.10 |
|
|
41.8% |
|
|
$15,474 |
|
|
1.49% |
|
|
(0.60)% |
|
|
152% |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
8.24 |
19.5% |
8,418 |
1.49% |
(0.35)% |
153% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
6.91 |
26.0% |
3,614 |
1.49% |
(0.32)% |
64% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
5.83 |
25.6% |
1,064 |
1.49% |
(0.05)% |
93% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
5.01 |
0.2% |
502 |
0.70%* |
0.00%* |
0% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE TRUST & GIFTSHARES FUND CONSULTANT CLASS (b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
|
$ 9.91 |
|
|
40.3% |
|
|
$ 3,469 |
|
|
2.49% |
|
|
(1.60)% |
|
|
152% |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
8.14 |
18.5% |
1,276 |
2.49% |
(1.39)% |
153% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
6.88 |
1.5% |
107 |
2.49%* |
(1.35)%* |
64% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE TOTAL RETURN FUND |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
|
$ 7.15 |
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
$248,448 |
|
|
1.25% |
|
|
2.32% |
|
|
39% |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
7.56 |
4.8% |
244,989 |
1.25% |
2.75% |
66% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
7.52 |
23.7% |
120,446 |
1.25% |
3.15% |
26% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
6.29 |
25.5% |
6,234 |
1.25% |
2.50% |
111% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
5.76 |
26.9% |
2,548 |
1.67% |
2.42% |
68% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE LOW-PRICED STOCK FUND |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
|
$ 8.16 |
|
|
29.8% |
|
|
$ 24,530 |
|
|
1.49% |
|
|
(0.49)% |
|
|
103% |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
6.95 |
2.4% |
21,174 |
1.49% |
(0.11)% |
111% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
6.82 |
19.5% |
18,096 |
1.49% |
(0.47)% |
99% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
6.30 |
22.8% |
15,905 |
1.88% |
(0.67)% |
137% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 |
5.62 |
22.5% |
4,215 |
1.97% |
(1.11)% |
114% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROYCE OPPORTUNITY FUND (c) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1999 |
|
|
$ 7.19 |
|
|
32.3% |
|
|
$ 60,399 |
|
|
1.46% |
|
|
(0.07)% |
|
|
122% |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1998 |
6.02 |
4.9% |
34,278 |
1.25% |
(0.16)% |
120% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1997 |
5.92 |
20.8% |
22,244 |
0.99% |
1.23% |
77% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1996 |
5.26 |
5.2% |
17,857 |
0.97%* |
0.83%* |
1% |
(a) The Fund commenced operations on December 27, 1995.
(b) The Class commenced operations on September 26, 1997.
(c) The Fund commenced operations on November 19, 1996.
(d) Expense ratios are shown net of fee waivers and expense reimbursements by the adviser and/or the distributor, as applicable. Expense ratios for each period before the waivers and reimbursements would have been: 2.12%, 2.45%, 3.82%, 6.53% and 1.95% in 1999 to 1995, respectively, for Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund-Investment Class; 3.53%, 4.70% and 30.28% in 1999 to 1997, respectively, for Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund-Consultant Class; 1.31%, 1.35%, 1.67%, 2.23% and 2.38% in 1999 to 1995, respectively, for Royce Total Return Fund; 2.28%, 2.31%, 2.38%, 2.59% and 3.47% in 1999 to 1995, respectively, for Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund; and 1.54%, 1.56% and 1.97% in 1998 to 1996, respectively, for Royce Opportunity Fund.
* Annualized.
52 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Royce Premier Fund, Royce Micro-Cap Fund, Pennsylvania Mutual Fund, Royce Select Fund, Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund, Royce Total Return Fund, Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund and Royce Opportunity Fund (the "Fund" or "Funds"), are eight series of The Royce Fund (the "Trust"), a diversified open-end management investment company organized as a Delaware business trust. Effective April 30, 1999, Royce GiftShares Fund changed its name to Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund and PMF II changed its name to Royce Opportunity Fund.
Three funds in the series, Pennsylvania Mutual Fund, Royce Micro-Cap Fund and Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund, offer two classes of shares; an Investment Class and a Consultant Class. Classes of shares have equal rights as to earnings and assets, except that each class may bear different fees and expenses for distribution, shareholder servicing, registration and shareholder reports, and different expense reimbursements. Investment income, realized and unrealized capital gains or losses on investments, and expenses other than those attributable to a specific class are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Valuation of investments:
Securities listed on an exchange or on the Nasdaq National Market System are valued on the basis of the last reported sale prior to the time the valuation is made or, if no sale is reported for such day, at their bid price for exchange-listed securities and at the average of their bid and asked prices for Nasdaq securities. Quotations are taken from the market where the security is primarily traded. Other over-the-counter securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at their bid price. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at their fair value under procedures established by the Board of Trustees. Bonds and other fixed income securities may be valued by reference to other securities with comparable ratings, interest rates and maturities, using established independent pricing services.
Investment transactions and related investment income:
Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date and any non-cash dividend income is recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are determined on the basis of identified cost for book and tax purposes.
Expenses:
The Funds incur direct and indirect expenses. Expenses directly attributable to a Fund are charged to the Fund's operations, while expenses applicable to more than one series of the Trust are allocated in an equitable manner. Allocated personnel and occupancy costs related to The Royce Funds are included in administrative and office facilities expenses. The Fund has adopted a deferred fee agreement that allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees Fees payable on or after July 1, 1999. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Royce funds until distribution in accordance with the agreement.
Taxes:
As qualified regulated investment companies under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, the Funds are not subject to income taxes to the extent that each Fund distributes substantially all of its taxable income for its fiscal year.
Distributions:
Royce Total Return Fund pays dividends from its net investment income on a quarterly basis and makes any distributions from net realized capital gains annually in December. The other Funds pay any dividends and capital gain distributions annually in December. These distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications within the capital accounts. Undistributed net investment income may include temporary book and tax basis differences, which will reverse in a subsequent period. Any taxable income or gain remaining undistributed at fiscal year end is distributed in the following year. The Funds have designated the following amounts as a capital gain dividend for the purpose of the dividend paid deduction for 1999 (000's):
|
|
Royce Premier Fund |
$17,305 |
Royce Micro-Cap Fund |
2,409 |
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund |
25,409 |
Royce Select Fund |
|
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund |
93 |
Royce Total Return Fund |
5,603 |
Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund |
948 |
Royce Opportunity Fund |
1,138 |
|
Repurchase agreements:
The Funds enter into repurchase agreements with respect to portfolio securities solely with State Street Bank and Trust Company ("SSB&T"), the custodian of the Funds' assets. Each Fund restricts repurchase agreements to maturities of no more than seven days. Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements, which are held by SSB&T until maturity of the repurchase agreements, are marked-to-market daily and maintained at a value at least equal to the principal amount of the repurchase agreement (including accrued interest). Repurchase agreements could involve certain risks in the event of default or insolvency of SSB&T, including possible delays or restrictions upon the ability of each Fund to dispose of its underlying securities.
Security lending:
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund loans securities to qualified institutional investors for the purpose of realizing additional income. This income is included in interest income. Collateral on all securities loaned for Pennsylvania Mutual Fund is accepted in cash and is invested temporarily, typically in money market mutual funds, by the custodian. The collateral is equal to at least 100% of the current market value of the loaned securities.
INVESTMENT ADVISER AND DISTRIBUTOR:
Investment Adviser:
Under the Trust's investment advisory agreements with Royce & Associates, Inc. ("Royce"), Royce is entitled to receive management fees that are computed daily and, except for Royce Select Fund in 1999, payable monthly. Royce contractually committed to waive its fees and reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to maintain certain Funds' net annual operating expense ratios at specified levels through December 31, 1999.
53 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
|
Annual
contractual advisory fee as a |
Committed
net annual expense ratio
|
Year ended December 31, 1999 |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Investment Class |
Consultant Class |
Net advisory fees accrued |
Advisory fees waived |
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Royce Premier Fund |
1.00% |
N/A |
N/A |
$ 5,464,280 |
$ |
|||||
Royce Micro-Cap Fund |
1.50% |
1.49% |
2.49% |
1,421,494 |
464,060 |
|||||
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund |
0.78%* |
N/A |
N/A |
4,287,443 |
|
|||||
Royce Select Fund |
see below |
|||||||||
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund |
1.00% |
1.49% |
2.49% |
78,353 |
47,727 |
|||||
Royce Total Return Fund |
1.00% |
1.25% |
N/A |
2,375,933 |
147,162 |
|||||
Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund |
1.50% |
1.49% |
N/A |
189,309 |
107,192 |
|||||
Royce Opportunity Fund |
1.00% |
1.49% |
N/A |
421,670 |
|
|||||
|
Royce is entitled to receive from Royce Select Fund a performance fee of 12.5% of the Fund's pre-fee total return. The agreement provides that all expenses of the Fund, except brokerage commissions, taxes, interest and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by Royce. This fee is calculated and accrued daily, based on the Fund's then current net assets. The fee for the period from commencement date (November 18, 1998) through December 31, 1999 was payable on December 31, 1999. Royce voluntarily committed to waive performance fees until the Fund achieved a 15% total return since inception of the Fund. This condition was met on April 27, 1999. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Fund accrued $232,607 of performance fees (net of voluntary waivers of $38,745). Beginning January 1, 2000, the performance fee will be payable on a monthly basis and subject to high watermark accounting.
Distributor:
Royce Fund Services, Inc. ("RFS"), the distributor of the Trust's shares, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Royce. For the year ended December 31, 1999, RFS received 12b-1 distribution fees of $963,055 (net of voluntary waivers of $321,018), $11,242 and $20,312 from the Consultant Classes of Pennsylvania Mutual, Royce Micro-Cap and Royce Trust & GiftShares Funds, respectively. RFS voluntarily waived the distribution fees of $26,442 and $49,417 from the Investment Class of Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund and Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund. The distribution agreement provides for maximum fees at the annual rate of 1.0% of each Fund's Consultant Class average net assets and 0.25% of the average net assets of the Investment Class of Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund and Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund.
PURCHASES AND SALES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES:
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the cost of purchases and the proceeds from sales of investment securities, other than short-term securities, were as follows:
Purchases |
Sales |
|||
|
||||
Royce Premier Fund |
$247,533,567 |
$307,757,461 |
||
Royce Micro-Cap Fund |
29,387,549 |
99,078,582 |
||
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund |
112,693,975 |
242,984,332 |
||
Royce Select Fund |
12,957,950 |
6,174,480 |
||
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund |
19,410,753 |
17,533,790 |
||
Royce Total Return Fund |
120,458,259 |
90,890,426 |
||
Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund |
19,203,434 |
22,239,776 |
||
Royce Opportunity Fund |
61,603,782 |
49,762,550 |
||
|
At December 31, 1999, tax basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) was equal to the difference between aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of market value over tax cost, and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over market value, as follows:
Tax Basis Cost |
Net
Unrealized |
Gross Unrealized |
||||||
|
||||||||
Appreciation |
Depreciation |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Royce Premier Fund |
$431,318,550 |
$118,825,125 |
$148,030,711 |
$29,205,586 |
||||
Royce Micro-Cap Fund |
93,903,269 |
16,707,564 |
28,126,437 |
11,418,873 |
||||
Pennsylvania Mutual Fund |
348,475,688 |
152,608,624 |
187,334,323 |
34,725,699 |
||||
Royce Select Fund |
8,146,358 |
1,545,920 |
1,699,307 |
153,387 |
||||
Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund |
15,518,699 |
2,915,433 |
3,311,188 |
395,755 |
||||
Royce Total Return Fund |
259,075,623 |
(12,571,986) |
23,226,441 |
35,798,427 |
||||
Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund |
21,267,351 |
2,859,777 |
4,412,045 |
1,552,268 |
||||
Royce Opportunity Fund |
53,518,062 |
6,227,482 |
10,872,372 |
4,644,890 |
TRANSACTIONS IN AFFILIATED COMPANIES:
An "Affiliated Company," as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, is a company in which a Fund owns 5% or more of the company's outstanding voting securities. The following transactions were effected in shares of such companies for the year ended December 31, 1999.
Affiliated
|
Purchases |
Sales |
Realized
|
Dividend
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Shares |
Cost |
Shares |
Cost |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Royce Total Return Fund |
Mueller (Paul) |
|
|
|
|
|
$142,800 |
|||||||
|
54 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Trustees
of The Royce Fund and the Shareholders
of Royce Premier Fund, Royce Micro-Cap Fund, Pennsylvania
Mutual Fund, Royce Select Fund, Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund,
Royce Total Return Fund, Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund, and
Royce Opportunity Fund
In our opinion, the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Royce Premier Fund, Royce Micro-Cap Fund, Pennsylvania Mutual Fund, Royce Select Fund, Royce Trust & GiftShares Fund, Royce Total Return Fund, Royce Low-Priced Stock Fund and Royce Opportunity Fund (each a portfolio of The Royce Fund, hereafter referred to as the "Funds") at December 31, 1999, the results of each of their operations, the changes in each of their net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Funds' management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, which require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 1999 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 10, 2000
55 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
OFFICERS
Charles
M. Royce, President and Treasurer
Jack E. Fockler, Jr., Vice President
W. Whitney George, Vice President
Daniel A. O'Byrne, Vice President and Assistant Secretary
John E. Denneen, Secretary
TRUSTEES
Donald R. Dwight
Dwight Partners, Inc., President
Richard M. Galkin
Richard M. Galkin Associates, Inc., President
Stephen L. Isaacs
The Center for Health and Social Policy,
President; Attorney
William L. Koke
Shoreline Financial Consultants
Registered Investment Adviser
David L. Meister
SeniorLife.com, President
Charles M. Royce
Royce & Associates, Inc., President
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
CUSTODIAN AND TRANSFER AGENT
State Street Bank and Trust Company
56 | The Royce Funds Annual Report 1999
THIS JUST IN...
The advent of cable television, the proliferation of magazines and newsletters, and the increasing influence of the Internet have brought financial information closer to people than ever before. The effort to create a better educated investor is a great idea one that we wholeheartedly support. We also think that, for the most part, the various media do a fine job of keeping the public informed about important financial events. At the cable networks, however, something seems to have gotten lost along the way. In their zeal to cover every price movement as an earth-shattering news event, they often get too caught up in short-term minutiae. Movement of an eighth of a point on a $100 stock is treated as something that can only be properly understood by market experts who seem to never agree on anything. Have they forgotten that information and opinion are not synonymous with knowledge? Exposure to this endless stream of instant analysis throughout the day does not automatically result in a smarter investor. What follows is a cheerfully exaggerated version of the kind of constant commentary that often appears on financial networks:
9:30 a.m.
TERESA: Good Morning, I'm Teresa Bourse for Financial Update News Network. The Street is buzzing today with rumors that a major announcement is due regarding humongotech.com, the Internet services and technology company. Will it be another stock split? A merger, perhaps? Here's FUNN market expert Phil Fulminate with the latest. Phil?
PHIL: Terry, FUNN viewers may recall that I recommended this stock two years ago, at the time of its Initial Public Offering. This is a high-quality company with a major Internet presence whose stock has nowhere to go but up.
9:51 a.m.
TERESA: After-hours trading and endless gossip have resulted in a surprising opening for humongotech.com the stock opened at $120 per share, down 6 points. Let's go now to Steve deBear for additional insight into what has to be a shocking opening for many investors.
STEVE: Shocking for some, Teresa, but not to me. This stock is a dog that's been barking for some time. Call me old-fashioned, but no earnings means "Beware of the Dog."
[GRAPHIC: Computer monitor displaying newscaster of "FUNN" network]
10:29 a.m.
TERESA: This just in, humongotech.com has just jumped a point, to $121.
PHIL: In today's lightning-paced New Economy, you simply cannot keep a strong company like this down for long. The market is showing us that right now.
11:45 a.m.
TERESA: We're getting word now that the stock is up again, a full five points, to $126.
PHIL: That's not surprising the sky's the only limit for humongotech.com.
1:17 p.m.
TERESA: Humongotech.com is on its way to a dazzling day, currently at $154. Any comments, Steve?
STEVE: A sure sign that the bubble is about to burst. No bull can run forever. I may have been wrong about this in 1996. Okay, and in 1997, too. In 1998, my bear market prediction was more premature than inaccurate, but this time it's really true.
3:17 p.m.
TERESA: Humongotech.com, a market favorite well into afternoon trading until around 2:30, is struggling to rally after some brisk selling dragged it down to its current price of $128.
PHIL: I think that this is actually a good sign, a sign that timid investors are getting out and the stock's true believers are hanging around and hanging tough. This is a terrific stock, and I think it's poised for a big run-up in the next few days.
4:02 p.m.
TERESA: What a day for humongotech.com. A disappointing opening, followed by some furious buying, then a late flurry of even more furious selling on the heels of less-than-optimistic comments by analysts at Great Bull Brokerage. When the smoke cleared, the stock closed unchanged at $126 per share. Please stay tuned for our post-market analysis, folks.
THE
ROYCE
FUNDS
ONE OF THE INDUSTRY'S MOST EXPERIENCED AND
HIGHLY RESPECTED SMALL-COMPANY VALUE MANAGERS
Charles M. Royce, who has been our primary portfolio manager since 1973, enjoys one of the longest tenures of any active mutual fund manager. Today, with $3 billion in total assets under management, Royce & Associates remains an independent firm committed to the same principles that have served us well for more than 25 years.
MULTIPLE FUNDS, COMMON FOCUS
Over the years, we have chosen to concentrate on small-company value investing. Chuck Royce and his team provide investors with a range of funds that take full advantage of the large and diverse small-cap sector. Our goal is to offer both individual and institutional investors the best available small-cap value portfolios by participating in the small-cap market's total returns with below-average volatility.
REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS AND CONSISTENT DISCIPLINE
We have cultivated our approach by paying close attention to risk and by always maintaining the same discipline, regardless of market movements and trends. Royce Premier Fund, Royce Total Return Fund and Pennsylvania Mutual Fund have been among the least volatile small-cap equity funds available.
CO-OWNERSHIP OF FUNDS
As part of this commitment, it is important that our employees and shareholders share a common financial goal; our officers, employees and their families currently have approximately $39 million invested in The Royce Funds.
THE ROYCE FUNDS
1414 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK NY 10019
GENERAL INFORMATION SHAREHOLDER SERVICES AUTOMATED TELEPHONE SERVICES |
ADVISOR SERVICES BROKER/DEALER SERVICES |
www.roycefunds.com
[email protected]
This report must be accompanied or preceded by a current prospectus
for the Funds.
Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
|