<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 26, 2000
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission file number: 0-15086
---------------
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 94-2805249
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
901 SAN ANTONIO ROAD, PALO ALTO, CA 94303
(Address of principal executive offices with zip code)
(650) 960-1300
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
--------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES [X] NO [ ]
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practical date.
CLASS OUTSTANDING AT MARCH 26, 2000
Common Stock - $0.00067 par value 1,586,413,077
<PAGE> 2
INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
COVER PAGE 1
INDEX 2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income 3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 7
Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 14
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk 27
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings 28
Item 5 - Other Information 29
Item 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 30
SIGNATURES 31
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 3
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
---------------------------- ----------------------------
March 26, March 28, March 26, March 28,
2000 1999 2000 1999
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues:
Products $ 3,428,763 $ 2,546,978 $ 9,093,315 $ 7,124,504
Services 575,926 409,416 1,610,853 1,144,182
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total net revenues 4,004,689 2,956,394 10,704,168 8,268,686
Cost and expenses:
Cost of sales - products 1,541,723 1,175,783 4,119,741 3,295,968
Cost of sales - services 371,062 226,481 1,025,023 680,291
Research and development 417,002 327,016 1,171,598 921,795
Selling, general and administrative 1,067,476 814,375 2,901,809 2,294,319
Purchased in-process research and development 4,900 28,700 8,400 120,700
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total costs and expenses 3,402,163 2,572,355 9,226,571 7,313,073
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income 602,526 384,039 1,477,597 955,613
Interest income, net 43,684 22,683 103,814 59,089
Gain on sale of investments 112,200 -- 112,200 --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income before income taxes 758,410 406,722 1,693,611 1,014,702
Provision for income taxes 250,275 144,985 559,929 380,018
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income $ 508,135 $ 261,737 $ 1,133,682 $ 634,684
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Net income per common share - basic $ 0.32 $ 0.17 $ 0.72 $ 0.41
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Net income per common share - diluted $ 0.30 $ 0.16 $ 0.67 $ 0.39
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Shares used in the calculation of net income per share -
basic 1,584,901 1,551,942 1,570,783 1,538,245
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Shares used in the calculation of net income per share -
diluted 1,698,650 1,659,586 1,684,274 1,632,049
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
3
<PAGE> 4
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 26, June 30,
2000 1999
----------- -----------
(unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,464,093 $ 1,100,761
Short-term marketable securities 1,668,768 1,590,959
Accounts receivable, net 2,531,549 2,310,142
Inventories, net 557,589 307,873
Deferred tax assets 577,479 506,411
Other current assets 544,600 372,480
----------- -----------
Total current assets 7,344,078 6,188,626
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,894,416 1,613,628
Long-term marketable securities 1,912,357 --
Other assets, net 1,350,916 696,581
----------- -----------
$12,501,767 $ 8,498,835
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings $ 1,722 $ 1,646
Accounts payable 851,661 755,797
Accrued liabilities 2,214,548 1,655,554
Income taxes payable 152,122 402,813
Deferred revenue 623,773 432,452
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities 3,843,826 3,248,262
Long-term debt and other obligations 2,134,204 383,297
Total stockholders' equity 6,523,737 4,867,276
----------- -----------
$12,501,767 $ 8,498,835
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
4
<PAGE> 5
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nine Months Ended
-------------------------------
March 26, March 28,
2000 1999
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 1,133,682 $ 634,684
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 535,404 453,361
Tax benefits from employee stock plans 522,207 165,633
Purchased in-process research and development 8,400 120,700
Gain on sale of investments (112,200) --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (215,002) (358,674)
Inventories (249,716) 35,237
Other current and long-term assets (251,977) (445,364)
Accounts payable 95,108 223,515
Other current and long-term liabilities 536,094 647,469
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 2,002,000 1,476,561
----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of marketable securities (6,001,430) (1,537,851)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities 2,337,335 443,080
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities 1,668,592 265,229
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (646,517) (514,010)
Acquisition of spare parts and other assets (48,724) (90,522)
Purchases of equity securities (215,240) --
Proceeds from sales of equity securities 117,281 --
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired (84,033) (130,300)
----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (2,872,736) (1,564,374)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net 80,518 126,711
Acquisition of treasury stock (488,933) (218,679)
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plans 138,535 58,540
Net increase in borrowings and other obligations 1,503,948 1,632
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,234,068 (31,796)
----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 363,332 (119,609)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 1,100,761 835,625
----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 1,464,093 $ 716,016
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
5
<PAGE> 6
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(continued)
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nine Months Ended
---------------------------
March 26, March 28,
2000 1999
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 52,728 $ 672
========= =========
Income taxes $ 275,972 $ 82,358
========= =========
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
In conjunction with the Company's acquisitions,
liabilities were assumed as follows:
Fair value of assets acquired $ 106,926 $ 305,242
Cash paid for assets (84,253) (134,895)
Stock issued and options assumed (823) (144,483)
--------- ---------
Liabilities assumed $ 21,850 $ 25,864
========= =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
6
<PAGE> 7
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun" or the "Company") is a provider of products,
services, and support solutions for building and maintaining network computing
environments. Sun sells scalable computer systems, high-speed microprocessors,
and a line of high-performance software for operating networks, computing
equipment, and storage products. Sun also provides a full range of services
including support, education, and professional services. The Company markets its
products primarily to business, government, and education customers and operates
in various product segments across geographically diverse markets.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Fiscal Year
Sun's first three quarters end on the last Sunday in September, December and
March. The fourth quarter ends on June 30.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated. Certain amounts from prior years have been reclassified to conform
with the current year presentation.
On October 19, 1999, Sun completed its merger with Forte Software, Inc.
("Forte"). This merger was accounted for as a pooling of interests and,
accordingly, historical consolidated financial statements of the Company have
been restated to include the financial position, results of operations and cash
flows of Forte for all periods presented.
On December 7, 1999, the Company effected a two-for-one split of its common
stock paid in the form of a stock dividend. All share and per share data have
been adjusted to reflect the split for all periods presented.
While the quarterly financial information is unaudited, the financial statements
included in this report reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) that the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of the
results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial
condition of the Company at the date of the interim balance sheet. The results
for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the
entire year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 1999 has
been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date. The
information included in this report should be read in conjunction with the 1999
Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated by reference in the
Company's 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
7
<PAGE> 8
Computation of Net Income Per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is computed using the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common
share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive
common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive common
equivalent shares consist primarily of stock options.
Recent Pronouncements
In June 1998, Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("FAS 133"), "Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" was issued and is effective
for the Company July 1, 2000. FAS 133, as amended, requires the Company to
recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and to measure those
instruments at fair value. It further provides criteria for derivative
instruments to be designated as fair value, cash flow and foreign currency
hedges and establishes respective accounting standards for reporting changes in
the fair value of the derivative instruments. Upon adoption, the Company will be
required to adjust hedging instruments to fair value in the balance sheet and
recognize the offsetting gains or losses as adjustments to be reported in net
income or other comprehensive income, as appropriate. The Company does not
expect adoption of FAS 133 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101"), "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements." SAB 101 summarizes certain of the SEC's views in applying generally
accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements.
The Company is required to adopt SAB 101 no later than the first quarter of
fiscal 2001. Sun is currently evaluating the impact of SAB 101 on the Company's
results of operations and financial position.
3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
POOLING OF INTERESTS COMBINATION
On October 19, 1999, the Company completed its merger with Forte Software, Inc.
("Forte"), a software company that designs, develops, markets and supports a set
of products for developing, deploying and managing production applications in
distributed environments, including client/server and the Internet. Under the
terms of the merger agreement, the Company issued 12.7 million shares of Sun
common stock (with a fair market value of $47.03 per share on such date) in
exchange for all of Forte's common stock. In addition, Sun issued 2.7 million
stock options in exchange for Forte's previously outstanding stock options. The
number of Sun shares was calculated using an exchange ratio of 0.6 shares of Sun
stock for each share of Forte common stock. The transaction was accounted for as
a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the historical condensed consolidated
financial statements of the Company have been restated to include the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of Forte for all periods
presented. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the
effect of the merger on the Company's financial statements was not material.
8
<PAGE> 9
PURCHASE COMBINATIONS
The Company has completed several purchase acquisitions in fiscal 2000. The
consolidated financial statements include the operating results of each business
from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been
presented because the effects of these acquisitions were not material on either
an individual or an aggregate basis.
The Company calculated amounts allocated to in-process research and development
("IPRD") using established valuation techniques in the high-technology industry
and expensed such amounts in the quarter that the related acquisition was
consummated because technological feasibility of the in-process technology had
not been achieved and no alternate future uses had been established. Research
and development costs to bring the products from the acquired companies to
technological feasibility are not expected to have a material impact on the
Company's future results of operations or cash flows. The Company computed its
valuations of IPRD for the acquisitions discussed in the following paragraphs
using a discounted cash flow analysis on the anticipated income stream to be
generated by the purchased technology.
The excess purchase price over the estimated value of the net tangible assets
and IPRD was allocated to various intangible assets, consisting primarily of
developed technology and goodwill, as well as other intangible assets, such as
customer base and assembled workforce. The value of developed technology was
based upon future discounted cash flows related to the existing products'
projected income streams. The value of the customer base was determined based
upon the value of existing relationships and the expected revenue streams. The
value of the assembled workforce was based upon the cost to replace that
workforce. Intangible assets, including goodwill, are being amortized over their
estimated useful lives, ranging from two to five years.
On January 31, 2000, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of Trustbase Limited ("Trustbase"), the United Kingdom parent company of JCP
Computer Services Limited ("JCP"), by means of a stock purchase transaction
pursuant to which all of the shares of Trustbase were converted into the right
to receive cash. JCP is a developer of highly secure public key infrastructure
enabling technology. The total purchase price for Trustbase was approximately
$20.5 million. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase, with the excess
of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets
being allocated to various intangible assets, including goodwill ($7.4 million),
developed technology ($5.0 million) and assembled workforce and other
intangibles ($1.5 million). In addition to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired, the Company recorded a $4.9 million charge, representing the write-off
of IPRD.
On October 18, 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of NetBeans Ceska Republika a.s. ("NetBeans") by means of an asset purchase from
NetBeans' parent holding company, NetBeans, Inc., a British Virgin Islands
company, pursuant to which all of the shares of NetBeans were converted into the
right to receive cash. NetBeans is a Czech Republic joint stock company and a
developer of cross-platform Java(TM) technology-based integrated development
environments. The total purchase price was approximately $9.0 million. This
transaction was accounted for as a purchase, with the excess of the purchase
price over the estimated fair value of the tangible assets being allocated
primarily to various intangible assets, including goodwill ($8.0 million),
developed technology ($0.8 million) and other intangible assets ($0.2 million).
There was no IPRD associated with this acquisition.
9
<PAGE> 10
On August 5, 1999, Sun acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Star
Division Corporation ("Star Division") by means of a merger transaction pursuant
to which all of the shares of Star Division were converted into the right to
receive cash. Star Division is a company conducting development, engineering,
and testing activities associated with the completion of a new enterprise
application platform product. The total purchase price for Star Division was
approximately $59.5 million. Simultaneous with the acquisition of Star Division,
Sun acquired certain assets and liabilities of Star Division
Software-Entwicklung und Vertriebs GmbH ("Star Company"), a related party of
Star Division, for total cash consideration of approximately $14 million. These
transactions were accounted for as purchases, with the excess of the purchase
price over the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets being allocated
primarily to various intangible assets, including goodwill ($69.7 million),
developed technology ($3.3 million), distribution contracts ($1.1 million) and
assembled workforce ($1 million). In addition to the intangible assets acquired,
the Company recorded a $3.5 million charge, representing the write-off of IPRD.
4. INVENTORIES
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 26, 2000 June 30, 1999
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $174,568 $113,070
Work in process 76,045 51,183
Finished goods 306,976 143,620
-------- --------
$557,589 $307,873
======== ========
</TABLE>
5. MARKETABLE SECURITIES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET
Marketable securities and other assets, net of related amortization, are
comprised of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 26, 2000 June 30, 1999
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Marketable securities:
Short-term $1,668,768 $1,590,959
Long-term 1,912,357 --
---------- ----------
Total $3,581,125 $1,590,959
========== ==========
Other assets:
Equity securities in public companies $ 512,282 $ --
Equity securities in nonpublic companies 140,070 --
Intangible assets, net 221,522 205,431
Prepaid assets 232,501 286,732
Other 244,541 204,418
---------- ----------
Total $1,350,916 $ 696,581
========== ==========
</TABLE>
Marketable securities consist of money market funds, commercial paper,
certificates of deposits and debt securities of varying maturities. Equity
securities in public companies represent common stock holdings in public
companies. Marketable securities and equity securities in public companies are
considered available-for-sale and are reported at fair value with changes in
unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable taxes, recorded in stockholders'
equity. Gross unrealized gains related to the equity securities for the nine
months ended March 26, 2000 were $442.2 million. Equity securities in nonpublic
companies represent preferred or convertible stock holdings in nonpublic
companies and investments in venture capital funds. These investments are
recorded at the
10
<PAGE> 11
lower of cost or net realizable value. Realized gains and losses for all
investments are calculated based on the specific identification method.
6. DEBT OFFERING
On July 14, 1999, the shelf registration statement which Sun filed with the SEC
on June 18, 1999 became effective. The shelf registration statement registered
senior and subordinated debt securities and common and preferred stock with an
aggregate initial offering price of up to $3 billion. The securities registered
by Sun were in addition to the $1 billion of securities previously registered
and declared effective under a separate shelf registration statement filed with
the SEC. On August 4, 1999, the Company issued $1.5 billion of unsecured senior
debt securities in four tranches. The four tranches are comprised of the
following notes (the "Senior Notes"): $200 million (due on August 15, 2002 and
bearing interest at 7%), $250 million (due on August 15, 2004 and bearing
interest at 7.35%), $500 million (due on August 15, 2006 and bearing interest at
7.5%), and $550 million (due on August 15, 2009 and bearing interest at 7.65%).
Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually starting January 2000. Sun
may redeem all or any part of any tranche of the Senior Notes at any time at a
price equal to 100% of the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest in
addition to an amount determined by a quotation agent, representing the present
value of the remaining scheduled payments. The net proceeds from this offering
are being used to fund the expansion of the Company's business, including
additional working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions of products,
technologies and businesses and general corporate matters. Sun also entered into
various interest rate swap agreements to modify the interest characteristics of
the Senior Notes so that the interest associated with the Senior Notes
effectively becomes variable.
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income, net of related taxes, are as follows (in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
--------------------------------- ---------------------------------
March 26, March 28, March 26, March 28,
2000 1999 2000 1999
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income $ 508,135 $ 261,737 $ 1,133,682 $ 634,684
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on
investments, net (121,903) 1,839 268,228 (18,798)
Change in cumulative translation
adjustments (13,773) (6,971) (19,312) (4,672)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Comprehensive income $ 372,459 $ 256,605 $ 1,382,598 $ 611,214
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related taxes,
at March 26, 2000 and June 30, 1999, are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
March 26, 2000 June 30, 1999
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net $ 267,899 $ (329)
Cumulative translation adjustments (29,014) (9,702)
--------- ---------
Accumulated other comprehensive income $ 238,885 $ (10,031)
========= =========
</TABLE>
11
<PAGE> 12
8. OPERATING SEGMENTS
Although the Company has various divisions, the following are the only
reportable segments under the criteria of FAS 131: (1) Computer Systems and
Storage; and (2) Enterprise Services. Products in the Computer Systems and
Storage segment include a broad range of desktop systems, servers, storage, and
network switches, incorporating the UltraSPARC (TM) processors and Solaris(TM)
Operating Environment. In the Enterprise Services segment, the Company provides
a full range of services and support to existing and new customers, including
education, professional services, and systems integration. The Other segment
consists of various software and other miscellaneous divisions, such as
corporate, which did not meet the requirements individually for a reportable
segment as defined by FAS 131.
Information on reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
March 26, March 28, March 26, March 28,
2000 1999 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Computer Systems and Storage $ 3,027,989 $ 2,391,896 $ 8,204,040 $ 6,708,918
Enterprise Services 575,926 409,416 1,610,853 1,144,182
Other 400,774 155,052 889,275 415,586
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total $ 4,004,689 $ 2,956,394 $ 10,704,168 $ 8,268,686
============ ============ ============ ============
Interdivision revenues:
Computer Systems and Storage $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Enterprise Services 99,881 78,374 275,544 233,533
Other (99,881) (78,374) (275,544) (233,533)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
============ ============ ============ ============
Operating income:
Computer Systems and Storage $ 672,509 $ 443,842 $ 1,717,766 $ 1,136,168
Enterprise Services 72,003 51,524 200,850 139,364
Other (141,986) (111,327) (441,019) (319,919)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total $ 602,526 $ 384,039 $ 1,477,597 $ 955,613
============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Segment assets have not changed materially from June 30, 1999.
12
<PAGE> 13
9. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per
share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
------------------------------ ------------------------------
March 26, March 28, March 26, March 28,
2000 1999 2000 1999
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income $ 508,135 $ 261,737 $1,133,682 $ 634,684
========== ========== ========== ==========
Denominator:
Weighted average common 1,584,901 1,551,942 1,570,783 1,538,245
shares - basic
Effect of dilutive securities 113,749 107,644 113,491 93,804
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Weighted average common 1,698,650 1,659,586 1,684,274 1,632,049
shares - diluted ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income per common share - basic $ 0.32 $ 0.17 $ 0.72 $ 0.41
========== ========== ========== ==========
Net income per common share - diluted $ 0.30 $ 0.16 $ 0.67 $ 0.39
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 30, 2000, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
Innosoft International, Inc. ("Innosoft") by means of a merger transaction
pursuant to which all of the outstanding capital stock and options of Innosoft
were converted into the right to receive cash and shares of Sun common stock.
Innosoft is a developer of Internet standard-based messaging and directory
solutions. The total purchase price was approximately $47.0 million, comprised
of $3.6 million in cash, 406,285 shares of Sun common stock and the assumption
of vested stock options. This transaction will be accounted for as a purchase,
with the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net
tangible assets and IPRD being allocated to various intangible assets.
13
<PAGE> 14
ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth items from the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Income as a percentage of total net revenues:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
------------------------ ------------------------
March 26, March 28, March 26, March 28,
2000 1999 2000 1999
--------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues:
Products 85.6% 86.2% 85.0% 86.2%
Services 14.4 13.8 15.0 13.8
----- ----- ----- -----
Total net revenues 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
----- ----- ----- -----
Cost of sales:
Products 38.5 39.8 38.5 39.9
Services 9.3 7.6 9.6 8.2
----- ----- ----- -----
Total cost of sales 47.8 47.4 48.1 48.1
----- ----- ----- -----
Gross margin 52.2 52.6 51.9 51.9
Research and development 10.4 11.1 10.9 11.1
Selling, general and administrative 26.7 27.5 27.1 27.7
Purchased in-process research and development 0.1 1.0 0.1 1.5
----- ----- ----- -----
Operating income 15.0 13.0 13.8 11.6
Interest income, net 1.1 0.8 1.0 0.7
Gain on sale of investments 2.8 -- 1.0 --
----- ----- ----- -----
Income before income taxes 18.9 13.8 15.8 12.3
Provision for income taxes 6.2 4.9 5.2 4.6
----- ----- ----- -----
Net income 12.7% 8.9% 10.6% 7.7%
===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
All historical financial information has been restated to reflect the merger
with Forte Software, Inc. ("Forte") on October 19, 2000. The merger was
accounted for as a pooling of interests and, as such, the historical
consolidated financial statements of the Company have been restated to include
the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Forte for all
periods presented.
The following section contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly statements
regarding Japanese macroeconomic trends, the impact on our gross margin from
shifts in product mix, our expectations to invest in our services business,
services gross margin expectations for fiscal year 2000, our expectations
relating to future research and development and
14
<PAGE> 15
selling, general and administrative expenses, our expectations to continue
hiring personnel in certain areas, our expected effective income tax rate for
fiscal 2000, our liquidity and capital resources and as set forth in the section
entitled "Purchased in-process research and development," expected product
release dates, dates for which we expect to begin generating benefits from
projects, projected revenues, costs of revenue, selling, general and
administrative expenses and maintenance research and development information and
discount rates used by us to calculate discounted cash flows and our
expectations to continue and successfully complete product development as well
as realize our expected economic return. These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, and the cautionary statements set forth below
and those contained in "Future Operating Results," identify important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in any
such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
increased competition, adverse changes in general economic conditions, including
adverse changes in the specific markets for our products, adverse business
conditions, adverse changes in customer order patterns, lack of acceptance of
new products, pricing pressures, lack of success in technological advancements,
risks associated with foreign operations, failure to reduce costs or improve
operating efficiencies and our ability to attract, hire and retain key and
qualified employees. With respect to risks related to purchased in-process
research and development identified above, such factors also include but are not
limited to, delays in the development of in-process technologies or the release
of products into the market, or that we will receive any economic benefit from
such products as a result of delays in the development of the technology, the
complexity of the technology, our ability to successfully manage product
introductions, lack of customer acceptance, competition and changes in
technological trends, and fluctuations in market or general economic conditions.
Other factors that may affect our results and financial condition are set forth
in our 1999 Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated by reference in
our Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET REVENUES
Our net revenues were $4,004.7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2000 and
$10,704.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2000, representing an
increase of 35.5% and 29.5%, respectively, over the corresponding periods of
fiscal 1999.
Our products net revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2000 increased by
$881.8 million, or 34.6% to $3,428.8 million, over the corresponding period of
fiscal 1999. Products net revenue was $9,093.3 million for the nine months ended
March 26, 2000, an increase of $1,968.8 million, or 27.6% over the corresponding
period of fiscal 1999. Over 70% and more than half of the increase in products
net revenue for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2000,
respectively, are due to continued strong demand for our enterprise, including
our Sun Enterprise(TM) 10000 product line, and our workgroup servers. In
addition, increased revenues generated by our storage products and network
service provider offerings also contributed to our increased products net
revenue. As a result of the strong demand in our servers, high-end and low-end
desktop system revenue as a percentage of products net revenues has declined for
the three and nine months ended March 26, 2000, as compared to the corresponding
periods of fiscal 1999.
Our services net revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2000 increased by
$166.5 million, or 40.7% to $575.9 million over the corresponding period of
fiscal 1999. Services net revenue was $1,610.9 million for the nine months ended
March 26, 2000, an increase of $466.7 million, or 40.8% over the corresponding
period of fiscal 1999. The increases in services net revenue are primarily the
result of: (1) an overall shift towards premium service and support contracts
resulting from a larger installed base of high-end server products; (2) a larger
installed service base related to increased product unit sales; and (3)
increased revenues associated with our professional and educational services.
15
<PAGE> 16
Our domestic net revenues increased by 29.9% and 29.4% in the third quarter and
first nine months of fiscal 2000, respectively, over the corresponding periods
of fiscal 1999. Our international net revenues grew 41.0% and 29.5% in the third
quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2000, respectively, compared to the
corresponding periods of fiscal 1999. In US dollars, European net revenues
increased 39.7% and 26.4%, Rest of World (ROW) net revenues increased 62.0% and
43.1%, and Japanese net revenues increased 23.5% and 23.2%, in the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2000, respectively, as compared to the
corresponding periods of fiscal 1999. The increases in Europe are primarily due
to continued market acceptance of our products and services in UK, Germany and
southern European countries, as well as increased demand from northern European
countries. Although we have experienced U.S. dollar revenue growth in the
European marketplace on a year over year basis, there can be no assurance that
such trends will continue. In particular, if capital spending declines in
certain countries or industries, our results of operations and cash flow could
suffer. The increases in ROW and Japanese net revenues are attributable to
increased demand across the Asia Pacific region for our products and services.
Despite signs of recovery in the Japanese economy, we remain cautious with
regard to the Japanese market. In addition, if the economic trends in Japan
significantly worsen in a quarter or decline over an extended period of time,
our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.
A portion of our operations consists of manufacturing and sales activities
outside of the U.S. As a result, our results of operations could be
significantly adversely affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency
exchange rates or economic conditions in the foreign markets in which we
distribute our products. We are primarily exposed to changes in exchange rates
on the Japanese yen, the British pound and the Euro. When the U.S. dollar
strengthens against these currencies, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S.
dollar-based sales decreases. When the U.S. dollar weakens against these
currencies, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S. dollar-based sales increases.
Correspondingly, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S. dollar-based costs increases
when the U.S. dollar weakens and decreases when the U.S. dollar strengthens.
Overall, we are a net receiver of currencies other than the U.S. dollar and, as
such, benefit from a weaker dollar, and are adversely affected by a stronger
dollar relative to major currencies worldwide. Accordingly, changes in exchange
rates, and in particular a strengthening of the U.S. dollar, may adversely
affect our consolidated sales and operating margins as expressed in U.S.
dollars.
To mitigate the short-term effect of changes in currency exchange rates on our
non-U.S. dollar-based sales, product procurement, and operating expenses, we
routinely hedge our net non-U.S. dollar-based exposures by entering into foreign
exchange forward and option contracts. Currently, hedges of transactions do not
extend beyond three months. Given the short term nature of our foreign exchange
forward and option contracts, our exposure to risk associated with currency
market movement on the instruments is not material.
GROSS MARGIN
Total gross margin was 52.2% and 51.9%, for the third quarter and the first nine
months of fiscal 2000, respectively, compared to 52.6% and 51.9% for the
corresponding periods of fiscal 1999.
Products gross margin was 55.0% and 54.7% in the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2000, respectively, compared to 53.8% and 53.7% for the
corresponding periods of fiscal 1999. The increases in products gross margin for
the three and nine month periods in fiscal 2000 reflect the effects of increased
volumes of higher margin servers, partially offset by increased volumes of lower
margin workstations, as compared to the corresponding periods in fiscal 1999.
There could be a possible downward impact on our products gross margin should
the mix of higher margin servers and lower margin workstations change.
Services gross margin was 35.6% and 36.4% in the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2000, respectively, compared to 44.7% and 40.5% for the
corresponding periods of fiscal 1999. The decreases in services gross margin
reflect the impact of building additional infrastructure, improvements in
existing service delivery technologies and processes, and increased field
support headcount. These additional costs are partially
16
<PAGE> 17
offset by: (1) increased market penetration in enterprise data center accounts;
(2) an overall shift towards premium service and support contracts resulting
from a larger installed base of high-end server products; (3) continued growth
in professional and educational services revenues; and (4) increased economies
of scale in certain geographic markets. We expect to continue to invest in our
services business by hiring employees, increasing availability of spares
inventory in order to improve customer service response time, and evaluating
other infrastructure-related initiatives. We currently expect our services gross
margin to be in the mid-to-high thirty percent range for fiscal 2000.
We continuously evaluate the competitiveness of our product and service
offerings. These evaluations could result in repricing actions in the near term.
Our future operating results would be adversely affected if such repricing
actions were to occur and we were unable to mitigate the resulting margin
pressure by maintaining a favorable mix of systems, software, service, and other
products and by achieving component cost reductions, operating efficiencies and
increasing volumes.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
Our research and development (R&D) expenses increased by 27.5% to $417.0 million
in the third quarter of fiscal 2000, compared to $327.0 million for the
corresponding period of fiscal 1999. R&D expenses were $1,171.6 million for the
first nine months of fiscal 2000, an increase of $249.8 million, or 27.1%, in
comparison to the corresponding period in fiscal 1999. As a percentage of net
revenues, R&D expenses decreased to 10.4% and 10.9% in the third quarter and
first nine months of fiscal 2000, respectively, from 11.1% in both of the
corresponding periods of fiscal 1999. The dollar increases in R&D expenses in
the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2000, over the corresponding
periods in fiscal 1999, reflect our continued development of a broad line of
scaleable hardware products, including servers, workstations, storage
technologies and SPARC(TM) microprocessors, as well as software products which
utilize the Java(TM) platform, Solaris Operating Environment software and Jini
(TM) connection technology. Furthermore, R&D expenses have increased due to
additional development of products acquired through acquisitions and increased
compensation and compensation-related costs related to higher levels of R&D
staffing. The increases in R&D spending reflect our belief that to maintain our
competitive position in a market characterized by rapid rates of technological
advancement, we must continue to invest significant resources in new systems,
software, and microprocessor development, as well as continue to enhance
existing products. All of our R&D costs are expensed as incurred. While we
expect the dollar amount of research and development expenses to increase during
the fourth quarter, R&D as a percentage of revenue for fiscal 2000 is expected
to be in the range of 10.0% to 11.0% of total net revenue.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased by 31.1% to
$1,067.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2000 compared to $814.4 million
for the corresponding period of fiscal 1999. SG&A was $2,901.8 million for the
first nine months of fiscal 2000, an increase of $607.5 million, or 26.5%, in
comparison to the corresponding period of fiscal 1999. As a percentage of net
revenues, SG&A expenses decreased to 26.7% and 27.1% in the third quarter and
first nine months of fiscal 2000, respectively, from 27.5% and 27.7%,
respectively, in the corresponding periods of fiscal 1999. The dollar increases
in fiscal 2000 are primarily attributable to: (1) compensation resulting from
higher levels of headcount, principally in the sales organization; (2) annual
salary adjustments; (3) increased commissions and bonuses; and (4) marketing
costs related to promotional programs. We also made additional investments aimed
at improving our internal business processes. As a result, in fiscal 2000 we
expect SG&A expense to increase in dollar amount, as we continue to invest in
efforts to achieve additional future operating efficiencies through the
continual review and improvement of business processes. In addition, we expect
to continue to hire personnel to drive demand-creation programs and
17
<PAGE> 18
to build service and support organizations. SG&A as a percentage of revenue for
fiscal 2000 is expected to be in the range of 26.0% to 27.0% of total net
revenue.
PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
Purchased in-process research and development ("IPRD") of $8.4 million in the
first nine months of fiscal 2000 represents the write-off of in-process
technologies associated with our acquisitions of: (1) Trustbase Limited
("Trustbase"); and (2) Star Division Corporation ("Star Division") and certain
assets and liabilities of Star Division Software-Entwicklung und Vertriebs GmbH
("Star Company"), a related party of Star Division. (Collectively, these
companies are referred to as the "Star Companies"). Purchased IPRD of $120.7
million in the first nine months of fiscal 1999 represents the write-off of
in-process technologies associated with our acquisitions of: (1) NetDynamics,
Inc.; (2) i-Planet, Inc.; (3) Beduin Communications Incorporated; and (4)
Maxstrat Corporation. All of these business combinations are known collectively
as "Acquired Companies". At the date of each acquisition noted above, the
projects associated with the IPRD efforts had not yet reached technological
feasibility and the R&D in-process had no alternative future uses. Accordingly,
these amounts were expensed on the respective acquisition dates of each of the
Acquired Companies. Also see Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Unaudited) - Business Combinations.
Trustbase - Overview
On January 31, 2000, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of Trustbase, the United Kingdom parent company of JCP Computer Services Limited
("JCP"), by means of a stock purchase transaction pursuant to which all of the
shares of Trustbase were converted into the right to receive cash. JCP is a
developer of highly secure public key infrastructure enabling technology. The
total purchase price for Trustbase was approximately $20.5 million. This
transaction was accounted for as a purchase, with the purchase price being
allocated to tangible assets, intangible assets and IPRD.
At the acquisition date, Trustbase was engaged in development activity
associated with the Trustbase(TM) Transaction Manager, a software messaging
framework that supports the functions required to be deployed as an Indentrus
Transaction Coordinator. The Indentrus Transaction Coordinator is a messaging
specification jointly developed by Trustbase and a consortium of the world's
leading banks (Identrus) that enables business to business e-commerce through
financial institutions.
Key product features under development included:
- Implementation of the logical functions that would allow the use of
Identrus-enabled transactions at financial institutions.
- Support for the messaging framework that would allow interoperability
between financial institutions.
- Implementation of security, transaction protocols, authentication, and
authorization as specified in the Identrus Transaction Coordinator.
At the acquisition date, Trustbase had made substantial progress in the areas of
product definition, architecture design and coding. Remaining efforts necessary
to complete the Trustbase Transaction Manager relate primarily to additional
coding, testing and implementation. We anticipate pilot deployments of the
product during the May to August 2000 time frame, with a general availability
version scheduled for release in September, 2000, at which time we expect to
realize economic benefits associated with the Trustbase Transaction Manager.
18
<PAGE> 19
Star Companies - Overview
On August 5, 1999, Sun acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Star
Division Corporation by means of a merger transaction pursuant to which all of
the shares of Star Division were converted into the right to receive cash. Star
Division is a company conducting development, engineering, and testing
activities associated with the completion of a new enterprise application
platform product. The total purchase price for Star Division was approximately
$59.5 million. Simultaneous with the acquisition of Star Division, we acquired
certain assets and liabilities of Star Division Software-Entwicklung und
Vertriebs GmbH, a related party of Star Division, for total cash consideration
of approximately $14 million. These transactions were accounted for as
purchases, with the purchase price being allocated to tangible assets,
intangible assets and IPRD.
Trustbase and Star Companies - Valuation Analysis
We calculated the value of the in-process technologies acquired from Trustbase
and Star Companies using discounted cash flow analysis on the anticipated income
streams for each acquisition. The discounted cash flow analysis was based upon
our forecast of future revenues, cost of revenues, and operating expenses
related to the technology acquired. We projected revenue from the acquired
technology to increase each year during the project life and decrease after a
certain period as we expect to introduce new product technologies. Please refer
to our Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended December 26, 1999 for the Star
Companies discounted cash flow analysis and related assumptions.
For the Trustbase acquisition, we projected revenue from the acquired technology
to increase each year from fiscal 2000 through fiscal 2003, and then to decrease
in fiscal 2004, as we expect to introduce new project technologies. The
projections are based on our estimates of market size and growth, expected
trends in technology, and expected timing of new product introductions.
Our assumptions with respect to operating expenses used in the valuation
analysis included: (1) cost of goods sold; (2) SG&A expenses; and (3) R&D
expenses. Selected operating expense assumptions used were based on evaluations
of the overall business models for Trustbase, including both historical and
expected direct expense levels (as appropriate), and an assessment of general
industry metrics. The assumptions used for Trustbase are as follows: (1) we
projected that cost of revenues (expressed as a percentage of revenue) for the
IPRD averages 15% over the projection period; (2) we estimated that SG&A
(expressed as a percentage of revenue) for the IPRD averages 33% over the
projection period; and (3) maintenance R&D related to the IPRD was estimated to
be approximately 2% of revenue over the projection period.
The discount rates used in the discounted cash flow analysis were derived from
our weighted average cost of capital analysis for the acquisition, as well as
consideration of other factors, including useful life of the technology,
profitability levels of the technology, the uncertainty of technology advances
that are known at the valuation date, and the stage of completion of the
technology. The discount rates we used for the IPRD are typically adjusted
upward to reflect additional risks inherent in the product development life
cycle. The IPRD discount rate we selected for Trustbase was 30%.
The value of the IPRD reflects the relative value and contribution of the
acquired research and development. We gave consideration to the R&D's stage of
completion, the complexity of the work completed to date, the difficulty of
completing the remaining development, costs already incurred, and the projected
cost to complete the project in determining the value assigned to IPRD.
19
<PAGE> 20
Trustbase and Star Companies - Comparison to Actual Results
At March 26, 2000, we had incurred approximately $0.6 million of the planned
total costs to complete the acquired Trustbase R&D projects and approximately
$5.8 million of the $9.2 million planned total costs to complete for the
acquired Star Companies R&D projects. No significant adjustments have been made
in the estimated costs to complete the projects, the economic assumptions, or
expectations which underlie our acquisition decisions and related purchase
accounting. We are continuing our development efforts related to the in-process
technologies acquired. These development efforts are advancing at a rate
consistent with our expectations.
Given the uncertainties of the development and commercialization process, no
assurance can be given that deviations from these estimates will not occur. We
expect to continue the development of the acquired technologies and believe that
there is a reasonable chance of successfully completing such development.
However, as there is risk associated with the completion of the in-process
project and commercialization due to the remaining efforts to achieve
technological feasibility, rapidly changing customer needs, complexity of
technology and growing competitive pressures, there can be no assurance that the
project will meet with commercial success. Failure to successfully develop and
commercialize these in-process projects would result in the loss of the expected
economic return inherent in the fair value allocation. Additionally, the value
of our intangible assets acquired may become impaired.
Overall Status of Business Combinations Prior to Fiscal 2000
With respect to acquisitions completed prior to fiscal 2000, we believe that the
projections we used in performing our valuations for each acquisition are still
valid in all material respects; however, there can be no assurance that the
projected results will be achieved. We continue to make substantial progress
related to the development and commercialization of acquired technologies.
Although we have experienced delays in the completion of certain of our
development efforts and their related commercialization, the expected total
costs to complete such technologies have not materially increased, individually
or in the aggregate. We periodically evaluate our product development timeline
and modify our overall business plan in response to various factors.
Modifications to our business plan include the reallocation of resources among
various alternative development projects. The impact of delays in the
realization of economic benefits related to acquired technologies, individually
or in the aggregate, has not been material to our overall consolidated financial
position or results of operations as of and for the nine months ended March 26,
2000.
INTEREST INCOME, NET
Our net interest income was $43.7 million and $103.8 million for the third
quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2000, respectively, compared to
$22.7 million and $59.1 million, respectively, for the corresponding periods in
fiscal 1999. Our cash and investment portfolio increased in August 1999 due to
our issuance of $1.5 billion of unsecured senior debt securities. The increases
in interest income, net of interest expense, are primarily the result of higher
interest earnings on a larger portfolio base of cash and marketable securities,
partially offset by interest expense related to our issuance of the $1.5 billion
of unsecured debt securities.
Our interest income and expenses are sensitive to changes in the general level
of U.S. interest rates. In this regard, changes in U.S. interest rates affect
the interest earned on our cash equivalents and marketable securities. In
addition, to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in U.S. interest rates on our
fixed-rate unsecured debt securities, we have entered into interest rate swap
transactions so that the interest associated with these debt securities
effectively becomes variable.
20
<PAGE> 21
GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENTS
Gain on sale of investments was $112.2 million for the third quarter and first
nine months of fiscal 2000. There were no such gains for the corresponding
periods in fiscal 1999.
INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was 33.0% for the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2000, excluding non-recurring tax charges of $1.2 million
resulting from the write-off of IPRD associated with the acquisition of Star
Division in the first quarter of fiscal 2000. Our effective income tax rate,
including such charges for the third quarter and nine months ended March 26,
2000, was 33.0% and 33.1%, respectively.
Our effective income tax rate was 33.0% and 33.1% for the third quarter and
first nine months of fiscal 1999, respectively, excluding non-recurring tax
charges of $10.9 million resulting from the write-off of IPRD associated with
the acquisition of Maxstrat in the third quarter of fiscal 1999, $3.2 million
resulting from the write-off of IPRD associated with the acquisition of i-Planet
in the second quarter of fiscal 1999, and of $30.4 million resulting from the
write-off of IPRD associated with the acquisition of NetDynamics in the first
quarter of fiscal 1999. Our effective rate including such charges for the third
quarter and nine months ended March 28, 1999 was 35.6% and 37.5%, respectively.
We currently expect our effective income tax rate to remain at 33.0% for the
remainder of fiscal 2000. The expected tax rate excludes the impact of potential
mergers and acquisitions. The tax effects of merger and acquisition transactions
would be accounted for in the interim quarter in which the transactions occur.
Our expected rate is based on current tax law and current estimates of earnings,
and is subject to change.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $5,045.2 million at March
26, 2000. This represents an increase of $2,353.5 million from June 30, 1999.
The increase is primarily due to cash provided by operating activities of
$2,002.0 million and the issuance of the $1.5 billion of unsecured debt
securities. This increase was partially offset by (1) capital spending for real
estate development and capital additions to support increased headcount,
primarily in our services, engineering and marketing organizations of $646.5
million; and (2) acquisition of treasury stock of $488.9 million.
Accounts receivable increased by $215.0 million from June 30, 1999 to March 26,
2000. The growth in accounts receivable is primarily due to increased revenues.
Days sales outstanding (DSO) has improved from 59 days at June 30, 1999 to 57
days at March 26, 2000. Inventory levels have increased by $249.7 million from
June 30, 1999 to March 26, 2000. Inventory turns were 17.3 turns at June 30,
1999 and 15.7 turns at March 26, 2000. The increase in inventory and decrease in
inventory turns are primarily due to Sun's changes in business processes to
carry more inventory in order to better meet customer demand and provide
effective customer service. The increases in other current and long-term
liabilities of $536.1 million are primarily due to increases in accrued
liabilities. Accrued liabilities increased by $559.0 million from June 30, 1999
to March 26, 2000 primarily due to overall growth in the business and increased
compensation and compensation-related costs, as well as increases in sales and
marketing costs.
Purchases of equity securities, net of proceeds from sales, were $98.0 million
for the nine months ended March 26, 2000. Based on the strategic fit and the
potential returns, Sun invests in certain public or non-public companies. These
investments are typically long-term in nature as Sun may collaborate with the
investees to develop new technologies as well as to enhance existing products.
21
<PAGE> 22
At March 26, 2000, we had a revolving credit facility ("Facility") with banks
aggregating $500 million. The Facility is available subject to compliance with
certain covenants. No amounts were outstanding under the Facility.
On October 16, 1997, we filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities
and Exchange Commission relating to the registration for public offering of
senior and subordinated debt securities and common stock with an aggregate
initial public offering price of up to $1 billion. On October 24, 1997, this
shelf registration statement became effective. On June 18, 1999, we filed an
additional shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission relating to the registration for public offering of senior and
subordinated debt securities and common and preferred stock with an aggregate
initial public offering price of up to $3 billion. On July 14, 1999, this shelf
registration statement became effective. As a result, we were able to offer up
to $4 billion, from time to time, of debt securities and common and preferred
stock pursuant to Rule 415 in one or more separate series, in amounts, at prices
and on terms to be set forth in the prospectus contained in these registration
statements and in one or more supplements to the prospectus. On August 4, 1999,
we issued $1.5 billion in unsecured debt securities in four tranches. The four
tranches are comprised of the following notes (the "Senior Notes"): $200 million
(due on August 15, 2002 and bearing interest at 7%), $250 million (due on August
15, 2004 and bearing interest at 7.35%), $500 million (due on August 15, 2006
and bearing interest at 7.5%), $550 million (due on August 15, 2009 and bearing
interest at 7.65%). Sun also entered into various interest rate swap agreements
to modify the interest characteristics of the Senior Notes so that the interest
associated with the Senior Notes effectively becomes variable.
We believe that the liquidity provided by existing cash and marketable
securities and the borrowing arrangements described above will provide
sufficient capital to meet our requirements through fiscal 2001. We believe the
level of financial resources is a significant competitive factor in our industry
and we may choose at any time to raise additional capital through debt or equity
financings to strengthen our financial position, facilitate growth and provide
us with additional flexibility to take advantage of business opportunities that
may arise.
FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY WITH EXISTING OR NEW COMPETITORS, OUR
RESULTING LOSS OF COMPETITIVE POSITION COULD RESULT IN PRICE REDUCTIONS, FEWER
CUSTOMER ORDERS, REDUCED REVENUES, REDUCED MARGINS, REDUCED LEVELS OF
PROFITABILITY AND LOSS OF MARKET SHARE.
We compete in the hardware and software products and services markets. These
markets are intensely competitive. If we fail to compete successfully in these
markets, the demand for our products would decrease. Any reduction in demand
could lead to a decrease in the prices of our products, fewer customer orders,
reduced revenues, reduced margins, reduced levels of profitability, and loss of
market share. These competitive pressures could seriously harm our business and
operating results.
Our competitors are some of the largest, most successful companies in the world.
They include Hewlett Packard Company (HP), International Business Machines
Corporation (IBM), Compaq Computer Corporation (Compaq), and EMC Corporation
(EMC). Our future competitive performance depends on a number of factors,
including our ability to: continually develop and introduce new products and
services with better prices and performance than offered by our competitors;
offer a wide range of products and solutions from small single-processor systems
to large complex enterprise-level systems; offer solutions to customers that
operate effectively within a computing environment that includes hardware and
software from multiple vendors; offer products that are reliable and that ensure
the security of data and information; create products for which third party
software vendors will develop a wide range of applications; and offer high
quality products and services.
22
<PAGE> 23
We also compete with systems manufacturers and resellers of systems based on
microprocessors from Intel Corporation (Intel) and Windows NT operating system
software from Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft). These competitors include Dell
Computer Corporation (Dell), HP, and Compaq, in addition to Intel and Microsoft.
This competition creates increased pressure, including pricing pressure, on our
workstation and lower-end server product lines. We expect this competitive
pressure to intensify considerably during the remainder of our fiscal year 2000
and through fiscal year 2001 with the anticipated releases of new software
products from Microsoft and new microprocessors from Intel.
The computer systems that we sell are made up of many products and components,
including workstations, servers, storage products, microprocessors, the Solaris
Operating Environment and other software products. In addition, we sell some of
these components separately and as add-ons to installed systems. If we are
unable to offer products and services that compete successfully with the
products and services offered by our competitors or that meet the complex needs
of our customers, our business and operating results could be seriously harmed.
In addition, if in responding to competitive pressures, we are forced to lower
the prices of our products and services and we are unable to reduce our
component costs or improve operating efficiencies, our business and operating
results would be seriously harmed.
Over the last three years, we have invested significantly in our storage
products business with a view to increasing the sales of these products both on
a stand-alone basis to customers using the systems of our competitors, and as
part of the systems that we sell. The intelligent storage products business is
intensely competitive. EMC is currently the leader in this market. To the extent
we are unable to penetrate this market and compete effectively, our business and
operating results could be seriously harmed. In addition, we will be making
significant investments over the next few years to develop, market, and sell
software products under our recent alliance with America Online, Inc. (AOL) and
have agreed to significant minimum revenue commitments. These alliance products
are targeted at the e-commerce market and are strategic to our ability to
successfully compete in this market. If we are unable to successfully compete in
this market, our business and operating results could be seriously harmed.
THE PRODUCTS WE MAKE ARE VERY COMPLEX AND IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RAPIDLY AND
SUCCESSFULLY DEVELOP AND INTRODUCE NEW PRODUCTS, WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SATISFY
CUSTOMER DEMAND.
We operate in a highly competitive, quickly changing environment, and our future
success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products that our
customers choose to buy. If we are unable to develop new products, our business
and operating results would be seriously harmed. We must quickly develop,
introduce, and deliver in quantity new, complex systems, software, and hardware
products and components including our UltraSPARC microprocessors, the Solaris
Operating Environment, our intelligent storage products, and other software
products, such as those products under development or to be developed under our
alliance with AOL. The development process for these complicated products is
very uncertain. It requires high levels of innovation from both our product
designers and our suppliers of the components used in our products. The
development process is also lengthy and costly. If we fail to accurately
anticipate our customers' needs and technological trends, or are otherwise
unable to complete the development of a product on a timely basis, we will be
unable to introduce new products into the market on a timely basis, if at all,
and our business and operating results would be adversely affected. In addition,
the successful development of software products under our alliance with AOL
depends on many factors, including our ability to work effectively within the
alliance on complex product development and any encumbrances that may arise from
time to time that may prevent us from developing, marketing, or selling these
alliance software products. If we are unable to successfully develop, market, or
sell the alliance software products or other software products, our business and
operating results could be seriously harmed.
23
<PAGE> 24
Software and hardware products such as ours may contain known as well as
undetected errors, and these defects may be found following introduction and
shipment of new products or enhancements to existing products. Although we
attempt to fix errors that we believe would be considered critical by our
customers prior to shipment, we may not be able to detect or fix all such
errors, and this could result in lost revenues and delays in customer
acceptance, and could be detrimental to our business and reputation.
The manufacture and introduction of our new hardware and software products is
also a complicated process. Once we have developed a new product we face the
following challenges in the manufacturing process. We must be able to
manufacture new products in high enough volumes so that we can have an adequate
supply of new products to meet customer demand. We must be able to manufacture
the new products at acceptable costs. This requires us to be able to accurately
forecast customer demand so that we can procure the appropriate components at
optimal costs. Forecasting demand requires us to predict order volumes, the
correct mixes of our software and hardware products, and the correct
configurations of these products. We must manage new product introductions so
that we can minimize the impact of customers delaying purchases of existing
products in anticipation of the new product release. We must also try to reduce
the levels of older product and component inventories to minimize inventory
write-offs. Additionally, we may decide to adjust prices of our existing
products during this process in order to try to increase customer demand for
these products. If we are introducing new products at the same time or shortly
after the price adjustment, this will complicate our ability to anticipate
customer demand for our new products.
If we were unable to timely develop, manufacture, and introduce new products in
sufficient quantity to meet customer demand at acceptable costs, or if we were
unable to correctly anticipate customer demand for our new products, our
business and operating results could be significantly harmed.
OUR RELIANCE ON SINGLE SOURCE SUPPLIERS COULD DELAY PRODUCT SHIPMENTS AND
INCREASE OUR COSTS.
We depend on many suppliers for the necessary parts and components to
manufacture our products. There are a number of vendors producing the parts and
components that we need. However, there are some components that can only be
purchased from a single vendor due to price, quality, or technology reasons. For
example, we depend on Sony for various monitors, and on Texas Instruments for
our SPARC microprocessors. If we were unable to purchase the necessary parts and
components from a particular vendor and we had to find a new supplier for such
parts and components, our new and existing product shipments could be delayed,
severely affecting our business and operating results.
OUR FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS DEPEND ON OUR ABILITY TO PURCHASE A SUFFICIENT
AMOUNT OF COMPONENTS TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF OUR CUSTOMERS.
We depend heavily on our suppliers to timely design, manufacture, and deliver
the necessary components for our products. While many of the components we
purchase are standard, we do purchase some components, specifically color
monitors and custom memory integrated circuits such as SRAMS and VRAMS, that
require long lead times to manufacture and deliver. Long lead times make it
difficult for us to plan component inventory levels in order to meet the
customer demand for our products. In addition, in the past, we have experienced
shortages in certain of our components (specifically DRAMS and SRAMS). If a
component delivery from a supplier is delayed, if we experience a shortage in
one or more components or if we are unable to provide for adequate levels of
component inventory, our new and existing product shipments could be delayed and
our business and operating results could suffer.
24
<PAGE> 25
SINCE WE ORDER OUR COMPONENTS (AND IN SOME CASES COMMIT TO PURCHASE) FROM
SUPPLIERS IN ADVANCE OF RECEIPT OF CUSTOMER ORDERS FOR OUR PRODUCTS WHICH
INCLUDE THESE COMPONENTS, WE FACE A SUBSTANTIAL INVENTORY RISK.
As part of our component inventory planning, we frequently pay certain suppliers
well in advance of receipt of customer orders. For example, we often enter into
noncancelable purchase commitments with vendors early in the manufacturing
process of our microprocessors to make sure we have enough of these components
for our new products to meet customer demand. Because the design and
manufacturing process for these components is very complicated it is possible
that we could experience a design or manufacturing flaw that could delay or even
prevent the production of the components for which we have previously committed
to pay. We also face the risk of ordering too many components, or conversely,
not enough components, since the orders are based on the forecasts of customer
orders rather than actual orders. If we cannot change or be released from the
noncancelable purchase commitments, we could incur significant costs from the
purchase of unusable components, due to a delay in the production of the
components or as a result of inaccurately predicting component orders in advance
of customer orders. Our business and operating results could be seriously harmed
as a result of these increased costs.
DELAYS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT OR CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW
PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES COULD SERIOUSLY HARM OUR BUSINESS.
Delays in product development and customer acceptance and implementation of new
products could seriously harm our business. Delays in the development and
introduction of our products may occur for various reasons. For example, delays
in software development could delay shipments of related new hardware products.
Generally, the computer systems we sell to customers incorporate hardware and
software products that we sell, such as the UltraSPARC microprocessor, the
Solaris Operating Environment and intelligent storage products. Any delay in the
development of the software and hardware included in our systems could delay our
shipment of these systems.
In addition, if customers decided to delay the adoption and implementation of
new releases of our Solaris Operating Environment this could also delay customer
acceptance of new hardware products tied to that release. Adopting a new release
of an operating environment requires a great deal of time and money for a
customer to convert its systems to the new release. The customer must also work
with software vendors who port their software applications to the new operating
system and make sure these applications will run on the new operating system. As
a result, customers may decide to delay their adoption of a new release of an
operating system because of the cost of a new system and the effort involved to
implement it.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO CONTINUE GENERATING SUBSTANTIAL REVENUES FROM INTERNATIONAL
SALES OUR BUSINESS COULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY HARMED.
Currently, approximately half of our revenues come from international sales. Our
ability to sell our products internationally is subject to the following risks:
general economic and political conditions in each country could adversely affect
demand for our products and services in these markets; currency exchange rate
fluctuations could result in lower demand for our products, as well as currency
translation losses; changes to and compliance with a variety of foreign laws and
regulations may increase our cost of doing business in these jurisdictions;
trade protection measures and import and export licensing requirements subject
us to additional regulation and may prevent us from shipping products to a
particular market, and increase our operating costs.
WE EXPECT OUR QUARTERLY REVENUES AND OPERATING RESULTS TO FLUCTUATE FOR A NUMBER
OF REASONS.
Future operating results will continue to be subject to quarterly
fluctuations based on a wide variety of factors, including:
25
<PAGE> 26
Seasonality. Our sequential quarterly operating results usually
fluctuate downward in the first quarter of each fiscal year when compared to the
immediately preceding fourth quarter.
Increases in Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses will continue to
increase as we continue to expand our operations. Our operating results could
suffer if our revenues do not increase at least as fast as our expenses.
Acquisitions/Alliances. If, in the future, we acquire technologies,
products, or businesses, or we form alliances with companies requiring
technology investments or revenue commitments (such as our alliance with AOL),
we will face a number of risks to our business. The risks we may encounter
include those associated with integrating or comanaging operations, personnel,
and technologies acquired or licensed, and the potential for unknown liabilities
of the acquired or combined business. Also, we will include amortization expense
of acquired intangible assets in our financial statements for several years
following these acquisitions. Our business and operating results on a quarterly
basis could be harmed if our acquisition or alliance activities are not
successful.
Significant Customers. One of our customers, a major reseller, accounts
for more than 10% of our revenues in fiscal 1999. Sales to this customer
accounted for approximately 14% of our fiscal 1999 revenues. Our business could
suffer if this customer or any other significant customer terminated its
business relationship with us or significantly reduced the amount of business it
did with us.
YEAR 2000 READINESS
We have not experienced any known material adverse impacts on our products,
services, systems or internal systems as a result of the Year 2000 issue. The
costs associated with our Year 2000 efforts were not material. Although we
believe that the cost of Year 2000 modifications for both internal use software
and systems, as well as Sun's products, is not material, we cannot be sure that
various factors relating to the Year 2000 compliance issues will not seriously
harm our business or operating results. Even though we do not believe that we
are legally responsible for our customers' Year 2000 compliance obligations, it
is unclear whether different governments or governmental agencies may decide to
allocate liability relating to Year 2000 compliance to us without regard to
specific warranties or warranty disclaimers. Our business could suffer in any
given quarter if any liability is allocated to us. A significant disruption of
our financial management and control systems or a lengthy interruption in our
operations caused by a Year 2000 related issue could also result in a material
adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.
OUR ACQUISITION AND ALLIANCE ACTIVITIES COULD DISRUPT OUR ONGOING BUSINESS.
We intend to continue to make investments in companies, products and
technologies, either through acquisitions or investment alliances. For example,
we have purchased several companies in the past and have also formed alliances,
including our alliance with AOL. Acquisitions and alliance activities often
involve potential risks, including: difficulty in assimilating the acquired
operations and employees; difficulty in managing product codevelopment
activities with our alliance partners; retaining the key employees of the
acquired operation; disruption of our ongoing business; inability to
successfully integrate the acquired technology and operations into our business
and maintain uniform standards, controls, policies, and procedures; and lacking
the experience to enter into new markets, products, or technologies.
Some of these factors are beyond our control. Failure to manage these alliance
activities effectively and to integrate entities or assets that we acquire could
affect our operating results or financial condition.
26
<PAGE> 27
WE DEPEND ON KEY EMPLOYEES AND FACE COMPETITION IN HIRING AND RETAINING
QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES.
Our employees are vital to our success, and our key management, engineering, and
other employees are difficult to replace. We generally do not have employment
contracts with our key employees. Further, we do not maintain key person life
insurance on any of our employees. The expansion of high technology companies in
Silicon Valley and Colorado, as well as many other cities, has increased demand
and competition for qualified personnel. We may not be able to attract,
assimilate, or retain additional highly qualified employees in the future. These
factors could harm our business.
ITEM 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to financial market risks at March 26, 2000, including changes in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and marketable security prices.
However, we do not believe any such exposures are material. Our interest rate
risk exposure relates to our investment portfolio of cash and marketable
securities, as well as our unsecured senior debt and related interest rate
swaps. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk related to our
foreign exchange option and forward contracts. We are exposed to equity market
price risks on our portfolio of marketable equity securities. To reduce certain
risks, we utilize derivative financial instruments. We do not use derivative
financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Specifically, we are exposed to equity market price risks related to our equity
securities in public companies. Changes in the values of these equity securities
may be substantial and are difficult to predict as they are affected by the
volatility of the equity market. The market value of the equity securities as of
March 26, 2000 was $512.3 million. The market value of the same equity
securities holdings at April 21, 2000 was $259.2 million.
See further comments regarding market risk under the "Results of Operations" and
"Liquidity and Capital Resources" headings in "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 2.
27
<PAGE> 28
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On October 7, 1997, we filed suit against Microsoft in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California alleging breach of
contract, trademark infringement, false advertising, unfair competition,
interference with prospective economic advantage and inducing breach of
contract. We filed an amended complaint on October 14, 1997. Microsoft filed its
answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaims to the amended complaint. The
counterclaims include breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith
and fair dealing, violation of the California Business & Professions Code and
declaratory judgment. We believe that the counterclaims are without merit and/or
that we have affirmative defenses and intend to vigorously defend ourselves with
respect thereto. On March 24, 1998, the United States District Court judge ruled
in our favor granting a preliminary injunction directing Microsoft to cease
using our Java Compatible Logo(TM) on Microsoft products that failed to pass the
applicable test suites from Sun. In addition, on May 12, 1998, we filed a second
amended complaint alleging copyright infringement by Microsoft and motions
requesting further preliminary injunctive relief directed against the planned
release by Microsoft of additional products that failed to pass our applicable
test suites. The Court held hearings and arguments on such motions on September
8, 9, and 10, 1998. On November 17, 1998, the District Court issued an Order
granting, in substantial part, our request for preliminary injunctions. On
December 15, 1998, Microsoft filed notice of its intent to appeal the District
Court's Order and on December 18, 1998, Microsoft filed Motions with the
District Court to extend the time for compliance with the Order and to clarify
or modify the Order. On January 13, 1999, Microsoft filed an appeal to the
District Court's Order issued on November 17, 1998. On January 22, 1999, Sun and
Microsoft filed numerous motions for summary judgment with the District Court.
On February 24 and April 5, 2000, respectively, the Court denied various motions
for summary adjudication filed by Microsoft and Sun.
An appellate argument before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals relating to the
November 1998 preliminary injunction granted in our favor occurred on June 16,
1999. On August 23, 1999, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals issued an opinion and ruling on Microsoft's appeal to that Court of the
November 1998 preliminary injunction issued by the District Court. The Ninth
Circuit panel, in its ruling, found sufficient evidence in the record to support
the District Court's conclusion that Sun is likely to prevail on the merits of
its breach of contract claims against Microsoft. However, the panel vacated the
copyright infringement-based injunction that the District Court had entered and
remanded the case back to the District Court for further consideration. The
Remand Order and the lifting of the injunction took effect on September 13,
1999. The District Court held a hearing regarding the Remand Order on October
15, 1999. On January 24, 2000, the District Court issued an Order reinstating,
in substantial part, the Court's previous preliminary injunction. The District
Court's Order was based upon a finding of unfair competition by Microsoft rather
than on a basis of copyright infringement. We believe that the outcome of this
matter will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows in any given fiscal period.
28
<PAGE> 29
ITEM 5 - OTHER INFORMATION
SCHEDULE OF SALES BY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS DURING THE QUARTER
The following is a summary of all sales of our Common Stock by our executive
officers and directors who are subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, during the fiscal quarter ended March 26, 2000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OFFICER/ NUMBER OF
DIRECTOR DATE PRICE SHARES SOLD
====================================================================================================
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Mel Friedman 2/23/00 $ 95.1270 96,000
Lawrence W. Hambly 2/24/00 $ 96.9375 25,000
2/24/00 $ 95.0625 25,000
2/24/00 $ 95.9375 25,000
2/29/00 $ 95.1250 25,000
Masood A. Jabbar 2/10/00 $ 94.0812 100,000
James Judson 2/9/00 $ 90.9375 10,000
Michael E. Lehman 1/31/00 $ 75.0000 112,000
2/10/00 $ 92.6699 160,000
2/16/00 $ 92.5313 80,000
2/25/00 $ 95.3125 80,000
Robert L. Long 2/2/00 $ 82.0000 20,000
2/9/00 $ 91.2500 10,000
2/23/00 $ 92.0000 20,000
John E. Marselle 2/23/00 $ 94.4063 40,000
John S. McFarlane 2/3/00 $ 83.0000 10,000
2/10/00 $ 94.5625 10,000
2/18/00 $ 94.6250 8,000
Stephen T. McGowan 1/26/00 $ 81.3864 50,000
Scott G. McNealy 2/8/00 $ 85.2639 18,000
Michael H. Morris 2/2/00 $ 82.0000 12,000
Alton D. Page 2/9/00 $ 91.3438 62,800
Gregory M. Papadopoulos 2/15/00 $ 93.0000 32,000
2/15/00 $ 90.8125 40,000
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE> 30
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Frank A. Pinto 2/9/00 $ 91.2604 30,000
2/10/00 $ 95.0900 20,000
2/24/00 $ 94.0600 50,000
Michael L. Popov 2/4/00 $ 84.0000 8,000
Janpieter T. Scheerder 2/4/00 $ 83.0000 20,000
2/10/00 $ 94.6250 3,200
2/10/00 $ 94.5625 1,800
2/24/00 $ 95.2500 80,000
John C. Shoemaker 2/4/00 $ 83.9230 48,000
2/25/00 $ 95.6950 48,000
Mark E. Tolliver 2/28/00 $ 94.5000 20,000
Edward J. Zander 2/3/00 $ 82.2813 50,000
2/4/00 $ 84.1500 50,000
2/10/00 $ 94.3359 100,000
</TABLE>
ITEM 6 - EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
27.0 Financial Data Schedule for the period ended March 26, 2000.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the period ended March 28, 1999 (restated for pooling of
interests merger with Forte Software, Inc.).
</TABLE>
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended March 26,
2000.
30
<PAGE> 31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
BY
/s/ MICHAEL E. LEHMAN
------------------------------------
Michael E. Lehman
Vice President, Corporate Resources
and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ MICHAEL L. POPOV
------------------------------------
Michael L. Popov
Vice President and Corporate Controller,
Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: May 9, 2000
31
<PAGE> 32
Exhibit Index
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
No. Description
- --- -----------
<S> <C>
27.0 Financial Data Schedule for the period ended March 26, 2000.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the period ended March 28, 1999
(restated for pooling of interests merger with Forte Software, Inc.)
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START> JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END> MAR-26-2000
<CASH> 1,464,093
<SECURITIES> 1,668,768
<RECEIVABLES> 2,531,549
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 557,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 7,344,078
<PP&E> 3,436,943
<DEPRECIATION> 1,542,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 12,501,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,843,826
<BONDS> 2,134,204
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 6,523,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 12,501,767
<SALES> 9,093,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 10,704,168
<CGS> 4,119,741
<TOTAL-COSTS> 5,144,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 4,081,807
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,693,611
<INCOME-TAX> 559,929
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 1,133,682
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 1,133,682
<EPS-BASIC> 0.72
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.67
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED TO REFLECT MERGER WITH FORTE SOFTWARE, INC. ON OCTOBER 19, 1999,
ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF INTEREST.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START> JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> MAR-28-1999
<CASH> 716,016
<SECURITIES> 1,307,790
<RECEIVABLES> 2,232,833
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 311,842
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 5,369,870
<PP&E> 2,674,852
<DEPRECIATION> 1,163,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 7,584,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,816,748
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 4,466,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 7,584,642
<SALES> 7,124,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 8,268,686
<CGS> 3,295,968
<TOTAL-COSTS> 3,976,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 3,336,814
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,014,702
<INCOME-TAX> 380,018
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 634,684
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 634,684
<EPS-BASIC> 0.41
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.39
</TABLE>
