<PAGE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
___________
FORM 10-Q/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-23193
___________
APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 94-2586591
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
6290 SEQUENCE DRIVE
SAN DIEGO, CA 92121
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (619) 450-9333
___________
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES [x] NO [_]
As of July 31, 1998, 23,077,405 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock
were issued and outstanding.
<PAGE>
ITEM PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements......................................... 1
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.................................... 6
The Registrant hereby amends the following items of its Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 1998 previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
<PAGE>
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, 1998 MARCH 31, 1998
-------------- ---------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
------
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................................................... $ 7,126 $ 6,460
Short-term investments available-for-sale.......................................... 61,509 61,436
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $337 and $350
at June 30, 1998 (unaudited) and March 31, 1998, respectively..................... 12,026 12,179
Inventories......................................................................... 8,845 8,185
Deferred income taxes............................................................... 3,582 3,882
Notes receivable from officer and employees......................................... 829 87
Other current assets................................................................ 2,224 2,297
-------- --------
Total current assets............................................................ 96,141 94,526
Notes receivable from officers and employees............................................. 186 1,090
Property and equipment, net.............................................................. 18,834 17,218
-------- --------
Total assets......................................................................... $115,161 $112,834
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................................................... $ 3,773 $ 5,215
Accrued payroll and related expenses................................................ 3,936 5,057
Other accrued liabilities........................................................... 2,799 2,344
Deferred revenue.................................................................... 1,460 1,873
Current portion of long-term debt................................................... 671 567
Current portion of capital lease obligations........................................ 1,258 2,053
-------- --------
Total current liabilities....................................................... 13,897 17,109
Long-term debt, less current portion..................................................... 3,026 2,736
Long-term capital lease obligations, less current portion................................ 1,139 1,355
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value:
2,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding.......................... - -
Common Stock, $0.01 par value:
Authorized shares - 60,000,000
Issued and outstanding shares - 22,786,543 at June 30, 1998 (unaudited)
and 22,536,013 at March 31, 1998............................................... 228 225
Additional paid-in capital.......................................................... 88,020 86,660
Deferred compensation, net.......................................................... (432) (472)
Retained earnings................................................................... 9,784 5,722
Notes receivable from stockholders.................................................. (501) (501)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity.................................................... 97,099 91,634
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity......................................... $115,161 $112,834
======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
<PAGE>
APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30,
--------
1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Net revenues................................................ $23,687 $17,053
Cost of revenues............................................ 9,399 8,156
------- -------
Gross profit................................................ 14,288 8,897
Operating expenses:
Research and development................................ 4,656 2,525
Selling, general and administrative..................... 4,096 3,339
------- -------
Total operating expenses............................ 8,752 5,864
------- -------
Operating income............................................ 5,536 3,033
Interest income, net........................................ 811 66
------- -------
Income before income taxes.................................. 6,347 3,099
Provision for income taxes.................................. 2,285 81
------- -------
Net income.................................................. $ 4,062 $ 3,018
======= =======
Basic earnings per share:
Earnings per share...................................... $ 0.18 $ 0.60
======= =======
Shares used in calculating basic earnings per share..... 22,057 5,031
======= =======
Diluted earnings per share:
======= =======
Earnings per share...................................... $ 0.17 $ 0.16
======= =======
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share... 24,471 18,941
======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
<PAGE>
APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------
JUNE 30,
---------
1998 1997
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Operating Activities
Net income........................................................................................ $ 4,062 $ 3,018
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization................................................................... 1,566 1,200
Amortization of deferred compensation........................................................... 40 10
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable........................................................................... 153 (1,224)
Inventories................................................................................... (660) (9)
Other current assets.......................................................................... 73 (17)
Accounts payable.............................................................................. (1,442) 1,543
Accrued payroll and other accrued liabilities................................................. 580 (735)
Deferred income taxes......................................................................... 300 (437)
Deferred revenue.............................................................................. (413) 272
-------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities.................................................. 4,259 3,621
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments...................................... 52,287 3,329
Purchase of short-term investments................................................................ (52,360) (4,603)
Notes receivable from officers and employees...................................................... 162 (8)
Purchase of property and equipment................................................................ (3,182) (1,035)
-------- -------
Net cash used for investing activities..................................................... (3,093) (2,317)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net....................................................... 116 25
Repurchase of preferred stock..................................................................... - (3,877)
Payments on capital lease obligations............................................................. (1,011) (785)
Proceeds from long-term debt...................................................................... 533 -
Payments on long-term debt........................................................................ (138) (37)
-------- -------
Net cash used for financing activities..................................................... (500) (4,674)
-------- -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents....................................... 666 (3,370)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period...................................................... 6,460 5,488
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............................................................ $ 7,126 $ 2,118
======== =======
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
Interest........................................................................................ $ 127 $ 124
Income taxes.................................................................................... $ 240 $ 24
</TABLE>
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
<PAGE>
APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. The accompanying financial statements reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion
of management, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for
the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of
results for a full year. The Company has experienced significant quarterly
fluctuations in operating results and it expects that these fluctuations in
sales, expenses and net income or losses will continue.
The financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the
presumption that users of the interim financial information have read or have
access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fiscal year.
Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the year ended March 31, 1998.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 128.
"Earnings per Share," which supersedes APB Opinion No. 15. SFAS 128 replaces the
presentation of primary earnings per share (EPS) with "Basic EPS" which includes
no dilution and is based on weighted-average common shares outstanding for the
period. Companies with complex capital structures, including AMCC, are also
required to present "Diluted EPS" that reflects the potential dilution of
securities such as employee stock options and warrants to purchase common stock.
SFAS 128 is effective for financial statements issued for periods ending after
December 15, 1997. On February 3, 1998, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 98 which revised the previous instructions for determining the
dilutive effects in earnings per share computations of common stock and common
stock equivalents issued at prices below the Company's initial public offering
(the "IPO") price prior to the effectiveness of the IPO.
4
<PAGE>
The reconciliation of shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings
per shares consists of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30,
------------------------
1998 1997
------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Shares used in basic earnings per share computations -
weighted average common shares outstanding 22,057 5,031
Effect of assumed conversion of preferred
stock from date of issuance -- 12,593
Net effect of dilutive common share
equivalents based on the treasury stock method 2,414 1,317
------ ------
Shares used in diluted earnings per share
computations 24,471 18,941
====== ======
</TABLE>
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
On April 1, 1998 the Company adopted, the Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, and SFAS No. 131,
Segment Information. SFAS No. 130 requires that all components of comprehensive
income, including net income, be reported in the financial statements in the
period in which they are recognized. Comprehensive income is defined as the
change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and
circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income for the three months
ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 did not differ from net income for the same
periods. SFAS No. 131 amends the requirements for public enterprises to report
financial and descriptive information about its reportable operating segments.
Operating segments, as defined in SFAS No. 131, are components of an enterprise
for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly
by the Company in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. The Company believes it operates in one business and operating
segment. The adoption of SFAS No. 131 did not have a material impact on the
Company's operations or financial position.
2. CERTAIN FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
JUNE 30, MARCH 31,
1998 1998
---- ----
Inventories (in thousands):
Raw materials $1,281 $1,207
Work in process 5,641 5,161
Finished goods 1,923 1,817
------ ------
$8,845 $8,185
====== ======
5
<PAGE>
3. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
In July 1998 the Company acquired the right to purchase, in the form of a
ground lease, a parcel of land as a site for its new wafer fabrication facility.
This parcel of land is located approximately one quarter mile from the Company's
headquarters in San Diego, California. The Company made payments of $0.9 million
related to this transaction in July 1998. The lease provides the Company with
the option, subject to certain conditions, to acquire the land for additional
payments of approximately $3.8 million through May 31, 1999. However, if certain
conditions are met the landlord can require the Company to purchase the land by
May 31, 1999. This lease may not be extended beyond May 31, 1999.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and the notes thereto and with Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that are included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1998 for Applied
Micro Circuit Corporation (the "Company" or "AMCC"). This quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, and in particular Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements
regarding future events or the future performance of the Company that involve
certain risks and uncertainties including those discussed in "Factors that May
Affect Future Results" below. Actual events or the actual future results of the
Company may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to such
risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as of
the date hereof. The Company assumes no obligation to update these forward-
looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or
assumptions affecting such forward-looking assumptions.
OVERVIEW
AMCC designs, develops, manufactures and markets high-performance, high-
bandwidth silicon solutions for the world's communications infrastructure. The
Company tailors solutions to customer and market requirements by using a
combination of high-frequency, mixed-signal design expertise, system-level
knowledge and multiple silicon process technologies. AMCC believes that its
internal bipolar and BiCMOS processes, complemented by advanced CMOS and planned
silicon germanium BiCMOS processes from external foundries, enable the Company
to offer high-performance, high-speed solutions optimized for specific
applications and customer requirements. The Company further believes that its
products provide significant cost, power, performance and reliability advantages
for systems OEMs in addition to accelerating time to market. The Company also
leverages its technology to provide products for the automated test equipment
("ATE"), high-speed computing and military markets.
In fiscal 1997, the Company substantially reorganized its management team and
increased its focus on becoming the leading supplier of high-performance, high-
bandwidth connectivity integrated circuits ("ICs") for the world's
communications infrastructure. Accordingly, the Company accelerated the pace of
development of new products for high-performance telecommunications and data
communications markets. Following the reorganization of the Company's management
team in fiscal 1997 and its renewed focus on application specific standard
products ("ASSPs") for the telecommunications and data communications markets,
the Company returned to profitability after two years of incurring net losses.
The Company's revenues have increased in each of the last nine fiscal quarters.
In addition, as a result primarily of the $25.6 million of net income generated
in fiscal 1997, fiscal 1998 and the first quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company
transitioned from an accumulated deficit of $15.4 million at March 31, 1996 to
retained earnings of $9.8 million at June 30, 1998.
6
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statement of operations
data as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
1998 1997
------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Net revenues................................................ 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of revenues............................................ 39.7% 47.8%
----- -----
Gross profit................................................ 60.3% 52.2%
Operating expenses:
Research and development.................................. 19.7% 14.8%
Selling, general and administrative....................... 17.3% 19.6%
----- -----
Total operating expenses............................... 37.0% 34.4%
----- -----
Operating income............................................ 23.3% 17.8%
Net interest income......................................... 3.4% 0.4%
----- -----
Income before provisions for income taxes................... 26.7% 18.2%
Provision for income taxes.................................. 9.6% .5%
----- -----
Net income.................................................. 17.1% 17.7%
===== =====
</TABLE>
Net Revenues. Net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 1998
were approximately $23.7 million, representing an increase of 39% over net
revenues of approximately $17.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
1997. Revenues from sales of communications products increased from 47% of net
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 1997, to 50% of net revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 1998, reflecting unit growth in shipments of
existing products, as well as the introduction of new products for these
markets. Revenues from sales of products to other markets, consisting of the
ATE, high-speed computing and military markets, decreased from 53% of net
revenues during the three months ended June 30, 1997, to 50% of net revenues for
the three months ended June 30, 1998, although aggregate revenues from sales to
these other markets increased in absolute dollars. The increase in absolute
dollars in revenues attributable to these other markets was primarily due to an
increase in shipments to the ATE Market, although sales in the ATE market
decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 1999 relative to sales in the ATE
market in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998. Sales to Nortel, the Company's
largest customer, accounted for 17% of net revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 1998 as compared to 20% for the three months ended June 30, 1997. Sales
outside of North America accounted for 29% of net revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 1998, as compared to 24% for the three months ended June 30,
1997. Although less than nine percent of the Company's revenues were
attributable to sales in Asia during the three months ended June 30, 1998, the
recent economic instability in certain Asian countries could adversely affect
the Company's business, financial condition and operating results, particularly
to the extent that this instability impacts the sales of products manufactured
by the Company's customers. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results--
International Sales."
Gross Margin. Gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of net revenues) was
60.3% for the three months ended June 30, 1998, as compared to 52.2% for the
three months ended June 30, 1997. The increase in gross margin resulted from
increased utilization of the Company's wafer fabrication facility, as well as a
$400,000 cost reduction on purchased parts, direct materials and services. The
Company's gross margin is primarily impacted by factory utilization, wafer
yields, product mix and the Company's timing of depreciation expense and other
costs associated with expanding its manufacturing capacity. Although AMCC does
not expect its gross margin to continue to increase at the rates reflected
above, its strategy is to maximize factory utilization whenever possible,
maintain or improve its manufacturing yields, and focus on the development and
sales of high-performance products that can have higher gross margins. There can
be no assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in achieving these
objectives or that the trend of increasing gross margins will continue. In
addition, these factors can vary significantly from quarter to quarter, which
would likely result in fluctuations in quarterly gross margin and net income.
See "Factors That May Affect Future Results-- Fluctuations in Operating
Results."
Research and Development. Research and development ("R&D") expenses increased
to approximately $4.7 million, or 19.7% of net revenues, for the three months
ended June 30, 1998, from approximately $2.5 million, or 14.8% of net revenues,
for the three months ended June 30, 1997. The increase in R&D expenses was due
to
7
<PAGE>
accelerated new product and process development efforts including a $800,000
increase in compensation costs and a $1.3 million increase in prototyping and
outside contractor costs. The Company believes that a continued commitment to
R&D is vital to maintain a leadership position with innovative communications
products. Accordingly, the Company expects R&D expenses to increase in absolute
dollars in the future. Currently, R&D expenses are primarily focused on the
development of products and processes for the telecommunications and data
communications markets, and the Company expects to continue this focus.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative
("SG&A") expenses were approximately $4.1 million, or 17.3% of net revenues, for
the three months ended June 30, 1998, as compared to approximately $3.3 million,
or 19.6% of net revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 1997. This
increase in SG&A expenses for the three months ended June 30, 1998, primarily
reflected a $300,000 increase in compensation costs, a $100,000 increase in
product promotion expenses, a $300,000 increase in costs associated with being a
public company and increases in certain other expenses. The decrease in SG&A
expenses as a percentage of net revenues in the three months ended June 30, 1998
was a result of net revenues increasing more rapidly than SG&A expenses. The
Company expects SG&A expenses to increase in the future due to additional
staffing in its sales and marketing departments.
Operating Margin. The Company's operating margin increased to 23.3% of net
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 1998, compared to 17.8% for the
three months ended June 30, 1997, principally as a result of the increase in
gross margin and decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues,
partially offset by the increase in R&D expenses as a percentage of net
revenues.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased to $811,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 1998 from $66,000 for the three months ended June
30, 1997. This increase was due principally to a $700,000 increase in interest
income resulting from larger cash and short-term investment balances generated
by the proceeds from the Company's public offerings completed in the year ended
March 31, 1998.
Income Taxes. The Company's estimated annual effective tax rate used for
the three months ended June 30, 1998 was 36% compared to an effective tax rate
of 2.6% for the three months ended June 30, 1997. This increase in the tax rate
was to due to the Company's expectation that its effective tax rate will
approximate statutory rates in fiscal 1999. Fiscal 1998's effective tax rate was
decreased from statutory rates due to the reduction of a valuation allowance
recorded against deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards and
credits.
Deferred Compensation. In connection with the grant of certain stock
options to employees during the six months ended September 30, 1997, the Company
recorded aggregate deferred compensation of $599,000, representing the
difference between the fair value of the Common Stock at the date of grant for
accounting purposes and the option exercise price of such options. Such amount
is presented as a reduction of stockholders' equity and amortized ratably over
the vesting period of the applicable options. Amortization of deferred
compensation recorded for the three months ended June 30, 1998 was $40,000. The
Company currently expects to record amortization of deferred compensation with
respect to these option grants of approximately $159,000, $159,000, $129,000 and
$25,000 during the fiscal years ended March 31, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002,
respectively.
Backlog. The Company's sales are made primarily pursuant to standard
purchase orders for delivery of products. Quantities of the Company's products
to be delivered and delivery schedules are frequently revised to reflect changes
in customer needs, and customer orders can be canceled or rescheduled without
significant penalty to the customer. For these reasons, the Company's backlog as
of any particular date is not representative of actual sales for any succeeding
period, and the Company therefore believes that backlog is not a good indicator
of future revenue. The Company's backlog for products requested to be shipped
and nonrecurring engineering services to be completed in the next six months was
$35.2 million on June 30, 1998, compared to $21.3 million on June 30, 1997.
Included in backlog at June 30, 1998 is an $8.6 million dollar order received in
the three months ended June 30, 1998 from Raytheon Systems Co. related to a end-
of-life buy for integrated circuits used in its high speed radar systems. See
"Factors That May Affect Future Results--Fluctuations in Operating Results."
8
<PAGE>
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards. In April 1998, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, "Reporting
Comprehensive Income" and SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information". The adoption of these standards did not
effect the operations or financial position of the Company at June 30, 1998 or
for the three months then ended.
Year 2000 Compliance. Many currently installed computer systems and
software products are coded to accept only two digit entries in the date code
field. These date code fields will need to accept four digits to distinguish
21st century dates from 20th century dates. Therefore, any of such computer
systems and software products that recognize a date code field of "00" as the
year 1900 rather than the year 2000 could result in errors or system failures.
As a result, many companies' software and computer systems may need to be
upgraded or replaced in order to resolve the potential impact of this
misinterpretation and the resulting errors or system failures and to make such
systems, equipment and software Year 2000 compliant. The Company has commenced
taking actions to correct such internal systems and is in the early stages of
conducting an audit of its third party suppliers as to the Year 2000 compliance
of their systems. Failure of the Company's internal computer systems or of such
third-party equipment or software, or of systems maintained by the Company's
suppliers, to operate properly with regard to the Year 2000 and thereafter could
require the Company to incur unanticipated expenses to remedy any problems,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating
results and the financial condition. Furthermore, the purchasing patterns of
customers or potential customers may be affected by Year 2000 issues as
companies expend significant resources to correct their current systems for Year
2000 compliance. These expenditures may result in reduced funds available to
purchase the Company's products, which could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, operating results and financial condition.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company's principal source of liquidity as of June 30, 1998 consisted
of $68.6 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Working
capital as of June 30, 1998 was $82.2 million, compared to $77.4 million as of
March 31, 1998. This increase in working capital was primarily due to net cash
provided by operating activities, offset by the purchase of property and
equipment.
For the three months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, net cash provided by
operating activities was $4.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively. Net cash
provided by operating activities for the three months ended June 30,1998
primarily reflected net income before depreciation and amortization expense less
decreased accounts payable. Net cash provided by operating activities for the
three months ended June 30, 1997 primarily reflected net income before
depreciation and amortization expense, plus increased accounts payable and less
increased accounts receivable.
Capital expenditures totaled $3.2 million and $1.0 million for the three
months ended June 30,1998, and 1997, respectively, of which $500,000 was
financed using debt for the three months ended June 30, 1998. The Company
intends to increase its capital expenditures for manufacturing equipment, test
equipment and computer hardware and software. The Company has tentative plans to
expand the cleanroom in its existing wafer fabrication facility to accommodate
new equipment that would expand capacity and would be used for process
development, however the Company is also evaluating other alternatives to
provide for additional capacity and process development. In addition, the
Company has tentative plans to initiate construction of a new six-inch wafer
fabrication facility during 1999 and to complete the physical plant during 2000.
The Company believes the new facility will not begin commercial production prior
to late 2000. The Company currently expects to spend approximately $14.8 million
on capital expenditures in the last three quarters of fiscal 1999, of which
approximately $5.7 million is currently estimated to be related to the potential
expansion of its existing wafer fabrication facility and approximately $6.0
million is planned to relate to the initial site acquisition and construction of
the Company's new wafer fabrication facility. In July 1998 the Company acquired
the right to purchase, in the form of a ground lease, a parcel of land as a site
for its new wafer fabrication facility. This parcel of land is located
approximately one-quarter mile from the Company's headquarters in San Diego,
California. The Company made payments of $0.9 million related to this
transaction in July 1998. The lease provides the Company with the option,
subject to certain conditions, to acquire the land for total additional payments
of approximately
9
<PAGE>
$3.8 million through May 31, 1999. However, the lease provides that, if certain
conditions are met, the landlord can require the Company to purchase the land by
May 31, 1999. The lease may not be extended beyond May 31, 1999. In the course
of acquiring land and securing financing for the proposed new facility, the
Company may be required to expend additional funds and to provide marketable
securities as collateral. The Company estimates that the total cost of the new
wafer fabrication facility will be at least $80.0 million, of which at least
$30.0 million relates to the purchase of land and construction of the facility
and at least $50.0 million relates to capital equipment purchases. The Company
plans to finance the new wafer fabrication facility through a combination of
available cash, cash equivalents and short term investments, cash from
operations, debt and lease financing and approximately $24.0 million of the net
proceeds of its initial and secondary public offerings. The Company is also
exploring other alternatives for the expansion of its manufacturing capacity,
including purchasing a wafer fabrication facility or entering into strategic
relationships to obtain additional capacity. Although the Company believes that
it will be able to obtain financing for a significant portion of the planned
capital expenditures at competitive rates and terms from its existing and new
financing sources, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful
in these efforts or that the new facility will be completed and in volume
production within its current budget or within the period currently scheduled by
the Company. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that other alternatives to
constructing a new wafer fabrication facility will be available on a timely
basis or at all. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results--Manufacturing
Capacity Limitations; New Production Facility," "--Dependence on Third-Party
Manufacturing and Supply Relationships" and "--Need For Additional Capital."
The Company believes that its available cash, cash equivalents and short-
term investments, and cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet
the Company's capital requirements for the next 12 months, although the Company
could be required, or could elect, to seek to raise additional capital during
such period. The Company expects that it will need to raise additional debt or
equity financing in the future. There can be no assurance that such additional
debt or equity financing will be available on commercially reasonable terms or
at all. See " Factors That May Affect Future Results--Need for Additional
Capital."
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Fluctuations in Operating Results
AMCC has experienced and may in the future experience fluctuations in its
operating results. The Company had fluctuating revenues and incurred net losses
in fiscal 1995 and 1996. The Company's quarterly and annual operating results
are affected by a wide variety of factors that could materially and adversely
affect revenues, gross profit and operating income, including, but not limited
to: the rescheduling or cancellation of orders by customers; fluctuations in the
timing and amount of customer requests for product shipments; fluctuations in
manufacturing output and yields and inventory levels; changes in product mix;
the Company's ability to introduce new products and technologies on a timely
basis; the announcement or introduction of products and technologies by the
Company's competitors; the availability of external foundry capacity, purchased
parts and raw materials; competitive pressures on selling prices; the timing of
investments in research and development; market acceptance of the Company's and
its customers' products; the timing of depreciation and other expenses to be
incurred by the Company in connection with the expansion of its existing
manufacturing facility and in connection with its proposed new wafer fabrication
facility; costs associated with compliance with applicable environmental
regulations; costs associated with future litigation, if any, including without
limitation, litigation or settlements relating to the use or ownership of
intellectual property; general semiconductor industry conditions; and general
economic conditions, including, but not limited to, economic conditions in Asia.
The Company's expense levels are relatively fixed and are based, in part,
on its expectations of future revenues. Because the Company is continuing to
increase its operating expenses for personnel and new product development and is
limited in its ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to any revenue
shortfalls, the Company's business, financial condition and operating results
would be adversely affected if increased revenues are not achieved. Furthermore,
sudden shortages of raw materials or production capacity constraints can lead
producers to allocate available supplies or capacity to customers with resources
greater than those of the Company,
10
<PAGE>
which could interrupt the Company's ability to meet its production obligations.
Finally, average selling prices in the semiconductor industry historically have
decreased over the life of a product, and as a result, the average selling
prices of the Company's products may be subject to significant pricing pressures
in the future. In response to such pressures, the Company may take pricing or
other actions that could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and operating results.
The Company's business is characterized by short-term orders and shipment
schedules, and customer orders typically can be canceled or rescheduled without
significant penalty to the customer. Due to the absence of substantial
noncancellable backlog, the Company typically plans its production and inventory
levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand, which is highly
unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. In addition, from time to time,
in response to anticipated long lead times to obtain inventory and materials
from its outside foundries, the Company may order materials in advance of
anticipated customer demand, which might result in excess inventory levels or
unanticipated inventory write-downs if expected orders fail to materialize or
other factors render the customer's products less marketable. Furthermore, the
Company currently anticipates that an increasing portion of its revenues in
future periods will be derived from sales of application-specific standard
products ("ASSPs"), as compared to application-specific integrated circuits
("ASICs"). Customer orders for ASSPs typically have shorter lead times than
orders for ASICs, which may make it increasingly difficult for the Company to
predict its revenues and inventory levels and adjust production appropriately in
future periods. A failure by the Company to plan inventory and production levels
effectively could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and operating results.
As a result of the foregoing or other factors, the Company may experience
fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly or annual basis that
could materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and
operating results. For example, as a result of the termination of a relationship
with a strategic foundry partner, decreased orders from two major customers,
charges associated with a reduction in the Company's workforce and charges for
excess inventory, the Company experienced revenue fluctuations and incurred net
losses in fiscal 1995 and 1996. Accordingly, the Company believes that period-
to-period comparisons of its operating results should not be relied upon as an
indication of future performance. In addition, the results of any quarterly
period are not indicative of results to be expected for a full fiscal year.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve increased
sales or maintain its profitability in any future period. In certain future
quarters, the Company's operating results may be below the expectations of
public market analysts or investors. In such event, the market price of the
Company's Common Stock could be materially and adversely affected.
Manufacturing Yields
The fabrication of semiconductors is a complex and precise process. Minute
levels of contaminants in the manufacturing environment, defects in masks used
to print circuits on a wafer, difficulties in the fabrication process or other
factors can cause a substantial percentage of wafers to be rejected or a
significant number of die on each wafer to be nonfunctional. In addition, the
Company's ongoing expansion of the manufacturing capacity of its existing wafer
fabrication facility could increase the risk to the Company of contaminants in
such facility. Many of these problems are difficult to diagnose, time consuming
and expensive to remedy and can result in shipment delays. As a result,
semiconductor companies often experience problems in achieving acceptable wafer
manufacturing yields, which are represented by the number of good die as a
proportion of the total number of die on any particular wafer, particularly in
connection with the commencement of production in a new fabrication facility or
the transfer of manufacturing operations between fabrication facilities. Because
the majority of the Company's costs of manufacturing are relatively fixed,
maintenance of the number of shippable die per wafer is critical to the
Company's results of operations. Yield decreases can result in substantially
higher unit costs and may result in reduced gross profit and net income. The
Company has in the past experienced yield problems in connection with the
manufacture of its products. For example, in the second quarter of fiscal 1997
the Company experienced a decrease in internal yields primarily due to the
Company's increasing volume production of a single product at less than normal
production yields in support of a customer's delivery requirements. This
decrease in internal yields adversely impacted the Company's gross margin for
the quarter by approximately $600,000. The Company estimates yields per wafer in
order to estimate the value of inventory. If yields are materially different
11
<PAGE>
than projected, work-in-process inventory may need to be revalued. The Company
has in the past and may in the future from time to time take inventory write-
downs as a result of decreases in manufacturing yields. There can be no
assurance that the Company will not suffer periodic yield problems in connection
with new or existing products or in connection with the commencement of
production in the Company's proposed new manufacturing facility or the transfer
of the Company's manufacturing operations to such facility, any of which
problems could cause the Company's business, financial condition and operating
results to be materially and adversely affected. See "--Manufacturing Capacity
Limitations; New Production Facility."
Semiconductor manufacturing yields are a function both of product design
and process technology. In cases where products are manufactured for the Company
by an outside foundry, the process technology is typically proprietary to the
manufacturer. Since low yields may result from either design or process
technology failures, yield problems may not be effectively determined or
resolved until an actual product exists that can be analyzed and tested to
identify process sensitivities relating to the design rules that are used. As a
result, yield problems may not be identified until well into the production
process, and resolution of yield problems would require cooperation by and
communication between the Company and the manufacturer. In some cases this risk
could be compounded by the offshore location of certain of the Company's
manufacturers, increasing the effort and time required to identify, communicate
and resolve manufacturing yield problems. If the Company develops relationships
with additional outside foundries, yields could be adversely affected due to
difficulties associated with adapting the Company's technology and product
design to the proprietary process technology and design rules of such new
foundries. Because of the Company's limited access to wafer fabrication capacity
from its outside foundries for certain of its products, any decrease in
manufacturing yields of such products could result in an increase in the
Company's per unit costs for such products and force the Company to allocate its
available product supply among its customers, thus potentially adversely
impacting customer relationships as well as revenues and gross margin. There can
be no assurance that the Company's outside foundries will achieve or maintain
acceptable manufacturing yields in the future. Furthermore, the Company also
faces the risk of product recalls resulting from design or manufacturing defects
which are not discovered during the manufacturing and testing process. Any of
the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and operating results.
Increasing Dependence on Telecommunications and Data Communications Markets and
Increasing Dependence on Application-Specific Standard Products
An important part of the Company's strategy is to continue its focus on the
telecommunications market and to leverage its technology and expertise to
penetrate further the data communications market for high-speed ICs. The Company
anticipates that sales to its other traditional markets will grow more slowly or
not at all and, in some instances, as in the case of military markets, may
decrease over time. The telecommunications and data communications markets are
characterized by extreme price competition, rapid technological change, industry
standards that are continually evolving and, in many cases, short product life
cycles. These markets frequently undergo transitions in which products rapidly
incorporate new features and performance standards on an industry wide basis.
If, at the beginning of each such transition, the Company's products are unable
to support the new features or performance levels being required by OEMs in
these markets, the Company would be likely to lose business from an existing or
potential customer and, moreover, would not have the opportunity to compete for
new design wins until the next product transition occurs. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to penetrate the telecommunications
or data communications market successfully. A failure by the Company to
develop products with required features or performance standards for the
telecommunications or data communications markets, a delay as short as a few
months in bringing a new product to market or a failure by the Company's
telecommunications or data communications customers to achieve market acceptance
of their products by end-users could significantly reduce the Company's revenues
for a substantial period, which would have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and operating results.
A significant portion of the Company's revenues in recent periods has been,
and is expected to continue to be, derived from sales of products based on the
Synchronous Optical Network ("SONET")/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy ("SDH")
transmission standards and the Asynchronous Transfer Mode ("ATM") transmission
standard.
12
<PAGE>
If the communications market evolves to new standards, there is no assurance the
Company will be able to successfully design and manufacture new products that
address the needs of its customers or that such new products will meet with
substantial market acceptance. Although the Company has developed some initial
products for the emerging Gigabit Ethernet and Fibre Channel communications
standards, volume sales of these products have only recently commenced, and
there is no assurance AMCC will be successful in addressing the market
opportunities for products based on these standards. See "--Rapid Technological
Change; Necessity to Develop and Introduce New Products."
The Company has under development a number of ASSPs for the
telecommunications and data communications markets, from which it expects to
derive an increasing portion of its future revenues. The Company has a limited
operating history in selling ASSPs, particularly to customers in the
telecommunications and data communications markets, upon which an evaluation of
the Company's prospects in such markets can be based. In addition, the Company's
relationships with certain customers in these markets have been established
recently. The Company's future success in selling ASSPs, and in particular,
selling ASSPs to customers in the telecommunications and data communications
markets, will depend in large part on whether the Company's ASSPs are developed
on a timely basis and whether such products achieve market acceptance among new
and existing customers, and on the timing of the commencement of volume
production of the OEMs' products, if at all. The Company has in the past
encountered difficulties in introducing new products in accordance with
customers' delivery schedules and the Company's initial expectations. There can
be no assurance the Company will not encounter such difficulties in the future
or that the Company will be able to develop and introduce ASSPs in a timely
manner so as to meet customer demands. Any such difficulties or a failure by the
Company to develop and timely introduce such ASSPs could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition and operating results. See
"--Rapid Technological Change; Necessity to Develop and Introduce New Products."
Dependence on the Automated Test Equipment Market
The Company historically has derived significant revenues from product sales
to customers in the Automated Test Equipment ("ATE") market and currently
anticipates that it will continue to derive significant revenues from sales to
customers in this market in the near term. Customers in the ATE market have
recently experienced decreased demand due primarily to changing growth in the
slower semiconductor industry and economic turmoil in Asia. Accordingly, the
Company's net revenues in the ATE market declined in the first quarter of fiscal
1999 relative to the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998.
There can be no assurance that conditions in the semiconductor industry
will improve or that the economic situation in Asia will improve. Because the
Company's revenues in the ATE market depend on the demand for its customers' ATE
products, any further reduction in such demand due to further downturns in the
semiconductor industry or continued economic turmoil in Asia could adversely
affect the Company's business, operating results and financial condition.
Dependence on High-Speed Computing Market
The Company historically has derived significant revenues from product
sales to customers in the high-speed computing market and currently anticipates
that it will continue to derive significant revenues from sales to customers in
this market in the near term. The market for high-speed computing IC products is
subject to extreme price competition. The Company believes that the average
selling prices of the Company's IC products for the high-speed computing market
will decline in future periods and that the Company's gross margin on sales of
such products also will decline in future periods. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to reduce the costs of manufacturing its high-
speed computing IC products in response to declining average selling prices.
Even if the Company successfully utilizes new processes or technologies to
reduce the manufacturing costs of its high-speed computing products in a timely
manner, there can be no assurance that the Company's customers in the high-speed
computing market will purchase such new products. A failure by the Company to
reduce its manufacturing costs sufficiently or a failure by the Company's
customers to purchase such products could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and operating results. Furthermore, the
13
<PAGE>
Company expects that certain of its competitors may seek to develop and
introduce products that integrate the functions performed by the Company's high-
speed computing IC products on a single chip. In addition, one or more of the
Company's customers may choose to utilize discrete components to perform the
functions served by the Company's high-speed computing IC products or may use
their own design and fabrication facilities to create a similar product. In
either case, the need for high-speed computing customers to purchase the
Company's IC products could be eliminated, which could adversely affect the
Company's business, financial condition and operating results. See "--Intense
Competition."
Rapid Technological Change; Necessity to Develop and Introduce New Products
The markets for the Company's products are characterized by rapidly
changing technologies, evolving and competing industry standards, short product
life cycles, changing customer needs, emerging competition, frequent new product
introductions and enhancements and rapid product obsolescence. The Company's
future success will depend, in large part, on its ability to develop, gain
access to and use leading technologies in a cost-effective and timely manner and
on its ability to continue to develop its technical and design expertise. The
Company's ability to have its products designed into its customers' future
products, to maintain close working relationships with key customers in order to
develop new products, particularly ASSPs, that meet customers' changing needs
and to respond to changing industry standards and other technological changes on
a timely and cost-effective basis will also be a critical factor in the
Company's future success. Furthermore, once a customer has designed a supplier's
product into its system, the customer typically is extremely reluctant to change
its supply source due to significant costs associated with qualifying a new
supplier. Accordingly, the failure by the Company to achieve design wins with
its key customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Products for telecommunications and data communications applications, as
well as for high-speed computing applications are based on industry standards
that are continually evolving. The Company's ability to compete in the future
will depend on its ability to identify and ensure compliance with evolving
industry standards. The emergence of new industry standards could render the
Company's products incompatible with products developed by major systems
manufacturers. As a result, the Company could be required to invest significant
time and effort and to incur significant expense to redesign the Company's
products to ensure compliance with relevant standards. If the Company's products
are not in compliance with prevailing industry standards for a significant
period of time, the Company could miss opportunities to achieve crucial design
wins. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in
developing or using new technologies or in developing new products or product
enhancements on a timely basis, or that such new technologies, products or
product enhancements will achieve market acceptance. In the past, the Company
has encountered difficulties in introducing new products and product
enhancements in accordance with customers' delivery schedules and the Company's
initial expectations. The Company could encounter such difficulties in the
future. The Company's pursuit of necessary technological advances may require
substantial time and expense. A failure by the Company, for technological or
other reasons, to develop and introduce new or enhanced products on a timely
basis that are compatible with industry standards and satisfy customer price and
performance requirements could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and operating results. See "--Fluctuations in
Operating Results," and "--Increasing Dependence on Telecommunications and Data
Communications Markets and Increasing Dependence on Application-Specific
Standard Products."
Intense Competition
The semiconductor market is highly competitive and subject to rapid
technological change, price erosion and heightened international competition.
The telecommunications, data communications, ATE and high-speed computing
industries in particular are intensely competitive. The Company believes that
the principal factors of competition in its markets are price, product
performance, product quality and time-to-market. The ability of the Company to
compete successfully in its markets depends on a number of factors, including
success in designing and subcontracting the manufacture of new products that
implement new technologies, product quality, reliability,
14
<PAGE>
price, the efficiency of production, design wins for its IC products, ramp up of
production of the Company's products for particular systems manufacturers, end-
user acceptance of the systems manufacturers' products, market acceptance of
competitors' products and general economic conditions. In addition, the
Company's competitors may offer enhancements to existing products or offer new
products based on new technologies, industry standards or customer requirements
that are available to customers on a more timely basis than comparable products
from the Company or that have the potential to replace or provide lower-cost
alternatives to the Company's products. The introduction of such enhancements or
new products by the Company's competitors could render the Company's existing
and future products obsolete or unmarketable. Furthermore, once a customer has
designed a supplier's product into its system, the customer is extremely
reluctant to change its supply source due to the significant costs associated
with qualifying a new supplier. Finally, the Company expects that certain of its
competitors and other semiconductor companies may seek to develop and introduce
products that integrate the functions performed by the Company's IC products on
a single chip, thus eliminating the need for the Company's products. Each of
these factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. See "--Dependence on High-Speed
Computing Market."
In the telecommunications and data communications markets, the Company
competes primarily against gallium arsenide ("GaAs") based companies such as
Giga, Rockwell International, TriQuint and Vitesse, and silicon based products
from companies such as Giga, Hewlett-Packard, Maxim, Philips, Sony and Texas
Instruments. In certain circumstances, most notably with respect to ASICs
supplied to Nortel, AMCC's customers or potential customers have internal IC
manufacturing capabilities, and this internal source is an alternative available
to the customer. In the ATE market, the Company's products compete primarily
against GaAs based products offered by Vitesse and silicon ECL and BiCMOS
products offered principally by semiconductor manufacturers such as Analog
Devices, Lucent Technologies and Maxim. In the high-speed computing market, the
Company competes primarily against Chrontel, Cypress, ICS, PLX and Tundra. Many
of these companies and potential new competitors have significantly greater
financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than the Company.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to develop new products
to compete with new technologies on a timely basis or in a cost-effective
manner. Any failure by the Company to compete successfully in its target
markets, particularly in the telecommunications and data communications markets,
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations. See "-- Increasing Dependence on
Telecommunications and Data Communications Markets and Increasing Dependence on
Application-Specific Standard Products."
Manufacturing Capacity Limitations; New Production Facility
The Company currently manufactures a majority of its IC products at its
four-inch wafer fabrication facility located in San Diego, California. The
Company believes that, upon the completion of further potential expansion of
capacity at its existing fabrication facility, it will be able to
satisfy its production needs of products produced in its fabrication facility
through 2000, although this date may vary depending on, among other things, the
Company's rate of growth. The Company will be required to hire, train and manage
additional production personnel in order to increase its production capacity as
scheduled. In the event the Company's expansion of the manufacturing capacity of
its fabrication facility is not completed on a timely basis, the Company could
face production capacity constraints, which could have a material adverse effect
on the Company's business, financial condition and operating results.
Based on the Company's current forecasts of its future need for
manufacturing capacity, the Company has tentative plans for the construction of
a new six-inch wafer fabrication facility, initially to complement, and
potentially to replace, its existing facility in San Diego. The Company is also
exploring other alternatives for the expansion of its manufacturing capacity,
including purchasing a wafer fabrication facility or entering into strategic
relationships to obtain additional capacity. In July 1998 the Company acquired
the right to purchase, in the form of a ground lease, a parcel of land as a site
for its new wafer fabrication facility. This parcel of land is located
approximately one quarter mile from the Company's headquarters in San Diego,
California. The Company made
15
<PAGE>
payments of $0.9 million related to this transaction in July 1998. This lease
provides the Company with the option, subject to certain conditions, to acquire
the land for total additional payments of approximately $3.8 million through May
31, 1999. However, the lease provides that if certain conditions are met, the
landlord can require the Company to purchase the land by May 31, 1999. The lease
may not be extended beyond May 31, 1999. The Company currently plans to acquire
the site to which it has rights by late-1998, to initiate construction of the
new facility during 1999 and to complete the physical plant during 2000.
Following the completion of the physical plant, the Company must install
equipment and perform necessary testing prior to commencing commercial
production at the facility, a process which the Company anticipates will take at
least nine months. Accordingly, the Company believes the new facility will not
commence commercial production prior to late 2000. This new fabrication facility
will have room for additional equipment and manufacturing capacity. The Company
estimates that the cost of the new wafer fabrication facility will be at least
$80.0 million, of which at least $30.0 million relates to the purchase of land
and construction of the building and at least $50.0 million relates to capital
equipment purchases necessary to establish the initial manufacturing capacity of
the facility. The Company currently anticipates that a significant portion of
these capital equipment purchases will occur prior to the end of 1999. The
Company intends to fund approximately $24.0 million of the total cost of the new
facility with a portion of the proceeds from the Company's initial and secondary
public offering. The balance of the cost of this facility is expected to be
funded through a combination of available cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments, cash from operations and additional debt, lease or equity
financing. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the
additional financing necessary to fund the construction and completion of the
new manufacturing facility. Any failure by the Company to obtain such financing
on a timely basis could delay the completion of the facility and have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations. As the rights to acquire the site for the Company's proposed new
manufacturing facility are subject to certain conditions, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to acquire the site in a timely manner,
if at all. Any significant delay by the Company in acquiring the site or, if
such site becomes unavailable, finding a new site for the potential wafer
fabrication facility, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, the Company's
existing wafer fabrication facility is, and its proposed new wafer fabrication
facility is expected to be, located in California. There can be no assurance
that these facilities will not be subject to natural disasters such as
earthquakes or floods. In addition, the depreciation and other expenses to be
incurred by the Company in connection with the expansion of its existing
manufacturing facility and in connection with its proposed new wafer fabrication
facility may adversely effect the Company's gross margin in any future fiscal
period. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that other alternatives to
constructing a new wafer fabrication facility will be available on a timely
basis or at all. See "--Dependence on Third-Party Manufacturing and Supply
Relationships" and "--Need For Additional Capital."
The construction of the new wafer fabrication facility entails significant
risks, including shortages of materials and skilled labor, unforeseen
environmental or engineering problems, work stoppages, weather interferences and
unanticipated cost increases, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on the building, equipping and production start-up of the new facility. In
addition, unexpected changes or concessions required by local, state or federal
regulatory agencies with respect to necessary licenses, land use permits, site
approvals and building permits could involve significant additional costs and
delay the scheduled opening of the facility and could reduce the Company's
anticipated revenues. Also, the timing of commencement of operation of the new
facility will depend upon the availability, timely delivery and successful
installation and testing of the necessary process equipment. As a result of the
foregoing and other factors, there can be no assurance that the new facility
will be completed and in volume production within its current budget or within
the period currently scheduled by the Company, which could have a material
adverse effect on its business, financial condition and operating results.
Furthermore, if the Company is unable to achieve adequate manufacturing
yields in its proposed new fabrication facility in a timely manner or if the
Company's revenues do not increase commensurate with the anticipated increase in
manufacturing capacity associated with the new facility, the Company's business,
financial condition and operating results could also be materially adversely
affected. In addition, in the future, the Company may be required for
competitive reasons to make capital investments in its existing wafer
fabrication facility or to accelerate the timing of the construction of its new
wafer fabrication facility in order to expedite the manufacture of products
based on more advanced manufacturing processes. To the extent such capital
investments are required,
16
<PAGE>
the Company's gross profit and, as a result, its business, financial condition
and operating results, could be materially and adversely affected. See "--
Manufacturing Yields."
The successful operation of the Company's proposed new wafer fabrication
facility, if completed, as well as the Company's overall production operations,
will also be subject to numerous risks. The Company has no prior experience with
the operation of the equipment or the processes involved in producing finished
six-inch wafers, which differ significantly from those involved in the
production of four-inch wafers. The Company will be required to hire, train and
manage production personnel in order to effectively operate the new facility.
The Company does not have sufficient excess production capacity at its existing
San Diego facility to fully offset any failure of the proposed new wafer
fabrication facility to meet planned production goals. The Company may transfer
its current San Diego manufacturing operations into the proposed new wafer
fabrication facility subsequent to its completion. Should this transfer occur,
there can be no assurance that the Company will not experience delays in
completing product testing and documentation required by customers to qualify or
requalify the Company's products from this facility as being from an approved
source as a result of this transfer, which could materially adversely affect the
Company's business, financial condition and operating results. The Company will
also have to effectively coordinate and manage two manufacturing facilities to
successfully meet its overall production goals. The Company has no experience in
coordinating and managing production facilities that are located at different
sites or in the transfer of manufacturing operations from one facility to
another. As a result of these and other factors, the failure of the Company to
successfully operate the proposed new wafer fabrication facility, to
successfully coordinate and manage the two sites or to transfer the Company's
manufacturing operations could adversely affect the Company's overall production
and could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition
and operating results.
Transition to New Process Technologies
The markets for the Company's products are characterized by rapid changes
in manufacturing process technologies. To provide competitive products to its
target markets, the Company must develop or otherwise gain access to improved
process technologies. The Company's future success will depend, in large part,
upon its ability to continue to improve its existing process technologies,
develop new process technologies, and adapt its process technologies to emerging
industry standards. The Company may in the future be required to transition one
or more of its products to process technologies with smaller geometries, other
materials or higher speeds in order to reduce costs and/or improve product
performance. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to improve
its process technologies and develop or otherwise gain access to new process
technologies, including, but not limited to silicon germanium process
technologies, in a timely or affordable manner or that such improvements or
developments will result in products that achieve market acceptance. A failure
by the Company to improve its existing process technologies or processes or
develop or otherwise gain access to new process technologies in a timely or
affordable manner could adversely affect the Company's business, financial
condition and operating results. See "--Rapid Technological Change; Necessity to
Develop and Introduce New Products," and "--Manufacturing Capacity Limitations;
New Production Facility."
Dependence on Third-Party Manufacturing and Supply Relationships
The Company relies on outside foundries for the manufacture of certain of
its products, including all of its products designed on CMOS processes, and all
of its products that it anticipates will be designed on silicon germanium
processes. The Company generally does not have long-term wafer supply agreements
with its outside foundries that guarantee wafer or product quantities, prices or
delivery lead times. Instead, the Company's products that are manufactured by
outside foundries are manufactured on a purchase order basis. The Company
expects that, for the foreseeable future, certain of its products will be
manufactured by a single outside foundry. Because establishing relationships
with new outside foundries takes several months, there is no readily available
alternative source of supply for these products. A manufacturing disruption
experienced by one or more of the Company's outside foundries would impact the
production of the Company's products for a substantial period of time, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and operating results. Furthermore, in the event that the transition
to the next generation of manufacturing technologies at one or more of the
Company's outside
17
<PAGE>
foundries is unsuccessful or delayed, the Company's business, financial
condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
There are additional risks associated with the Company's dependence upon
third-party manufacturers for certain of its products, including, but not
limited to, reduced control over delivery schedules, quality assurance,
manufacturing yields and costs, the potential lack of adequate capacity during
periods of excess demand, limited warranties on wafers or products supplied to
the Company, increases in prices and potential misappropriation of the Company's
intellectual property. With respect to certain of its products, the Company
depends upon external foundries to produce wafers and, in some cases, finished
products of acceptable quality, to deliver those wafers and products to the
Company on a timely basis and to allocate to the Company a portion of their
manufacturing capacity sufficient to meet the Company's needs. On occasion, the
Company has experienced difficulties in causing these events to occur
satisfactorily. The Company's wafer and product requirements typically represent
a very small portion of the total production of these external foundries. The
Company is subject to the risk that a producer will cease production on an older
or lower-volume process that is used to produce the Company's parts.
Additionally, there can be no assurance that such external foundries will
continue to devote resources to the production of the Company's products or
continue to advance the process design technologies on which the manufacturing
of the Company's products are based. Any such difficulties could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and operating
results. See "--Manufacturing Yields."
Certain of the Company's products are assembled and packaged by third-party
subcontractors. The Company does not have long-term agreements with any of these
subcontractors. Such assembly and packaging is conducted on a purchase order
basis. As a result of its reliance on third-party subcontractors to assemble and
package its products, the Company cannot directly control product delivery
schedules, which could lead to product shortages or quality assurance problems
that could increase the costs of manufacturing, assembly or packaging of the
Company's products. In addition, the Company may, from time to time, be required
to accept price increases for such assembly or packaging services that could
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition
and operating results. Due to the amount of time normally required to qualify
assembly and packaging subcontractors, product shipments could be delayed
significantly if the Company is required to find alternative subcontractors. In
the future, the Company may contract with third parties for the testing of its
products. Any problems associated with the delivery, quality or cost of the
assembly, testing or packaging of the Company's products could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and operating
results.
Due to an industry transition to six-inch and eight-inch wafer fabrication
facilities, there is a limited number of suppliers of the four-inch wafers used
by the Company to build products in its existing manufacturing facility, and the
Company relies on a single supplier for such wafers. Although the Company
believes that it will have sufficient access to four-inch wafers to support
production in its existing fabrication facility for the foreseeable future,
there can be no assurance that the Company's current supplier will continue to
supply the Company with four-inch wafers on a long-term basis. Additionally, the
availability of manufacturing equipment needed for a four-inch process is
limited and certain new equipment required for more advanced processes may not
be available for a four-inch process. If the Company is not able to obtain a
sufficient supply of four-inch wafers or to obtain the requisite equipment for
be four-inch process, the Company's business, financial condition and operating
results would be materially adversely affected.
Customer Concentration
Historically, a relatively small number of customers has accounted for a
significant portion of the Company's revenues in any particular period. The
Company has no long-term volume purchase commitments from any of its major
customers. In fiscal 1997, fiscal 1998 and the first quarter of fiscal 1999, the
Company's five largest customers accounted for approximately 44%, 46% and 48% of
the Company's revenues in each of such periods and sales to Nortel accounted for
approximately 20%, 21% and 17% of the Company's revenues in each of such
periods. The Company anticipates that sales of its products to relatively few
customers will continue to account for a significant portion of its revenues. In
the event of a reduction, delay or cancellation of orders from one or more
significant customers or if one or more of its significant customers select
products manufactured by
18
<PAGE>
one of the Company's competitors for inclusion in future product generations,
the Company's business, financial condition and operating results could be
materially and adversely affected. There can be no assurance that the Company's
current customers will continue to place orders with the Company, that orders by
existing customers will continue at current or historical levels or that the
Company will be able to obtain orders from new customers. The loss of one or
more of the Company's current significant customers could materially and
adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and operating
results. See "--Intense Competition," and "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
Management of Growth
The Company has experienced, and may continue to experience, periods of
rapid growth and expansion, which have placed, and could continue to place, a
significant strain on the Company's limited personnel and other resources. To
manage these expanded operations effectively, the Company will be required to
continue to improve its operational, financial and management systems and to
successfully hire, train, motivate and manage its employees. The Company's
ability to manage growth successfully will require such personnel to work
together effectively. In addition, the expansion of the Company's current wafer
fabrication facility, the construction and operation of the Company's planned
wafer fabrication facility, the initial integration of the proposed new wafer
fabrication facility with the Company's current facility and the subsequent
potential transfer of the Company's manufacturing operations to the proposed new
wafer fabrication facility will require significant management, technical and
administrative resources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to manage its growth or effectively integrate its planned wafer
fabrication facility into its current operations, and a failure to do so could
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition
and operating results.
Dependence on Qualified Personnel
The Company's future success depends in part on the continued service of
its key design engineering, sales, marketing and executive personnel and its
ability to identify, hire and retain additional personnel. There is intense
competition for qualified personnel in the semiconductor industry, in particular
design engineers, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
continue to attract and train such engineers or other qualified personnel
necessary for the development of its business or to replace engineers or other
qualified personnel who may leave the Company's employ in the future. The
Company's anticipated growth is expected to place increased demands on the
Company's resources and will likely require the addition of new management
personnel and the development of additional expertise by existing management
personnel. Although the Company has entered into an "at-will" employment
agreement with David M. Rickey, the Company's President and Chief Executive
Officer, the Company has not entered into fixed term employment agreements with
any of its executive officers. In addition, the Company has not obtained key-man
life insurance on any of its executive officers or key employees. Loss of the
services of, or failure to recruit, key design engineers or other technical and
management personnel could be significantly detrimental to the Company's product
and process development programs or otherwise have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, financial condition and operating results.
Need for Additional Capital
The Company requires substantial working capital to fund its business,
particularly to finance inventories and accounts receivable and for capital
expenditures. The Company believes its available cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments and cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to
meet the Company's capital requirements through the next 12 months, although the
Company could be required, or could elect, to seek to raise additional financing
during such period. The Company's future capital requirements will depend on
many factors, including the costs associated with the expansion of its
manufacturing operations, the rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of
spending to support research and development programs and expansion of sales and
marketing, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to
existing products, and market acceptance of the Company's products. The Company
expects that it will need to raise additional debt or equity financing in the
future, primarily for purposes of financing the acquisition of property for its
proposed new wafer fabrication facility, the construction of the proposed new
wafer fabrication facility and the purchase of equipment
19
<PAGE>
for the proposed new wafer fabrication facility. There can be no assurance that
such additional debt or equity financing will be available on commercially
reasonable terms or at all.
Uncertainty Regarding Patents and Protection of Proprietary Rights
The Company relies in part on patents to protect its intellectual property.
There can be no assurance that the Company's pending patent applications or any
future applications will be approved, or that any issued patents will provide
the Company with competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third
parties, or that if challenged, will be found to be valid or enforceable, or
that the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on the Company's
ability to do business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others will
not independently develop similar products or processes, duplicate the Company's
products or processes or design around any patents that may be issued the
Company.
To protect its intellectual property, the Company also relies on the
combination of mask work protection under the Federal Semiconductor Chip
Protection Act of 1984, trademarks, copyrights, trade secret laws, employee and
third-party nondisclosure agreements and licensing arrangements. Despite these
efforts, there can be no assurance that others will not independently develop
substantially equivalent intellectual property or otherwise gain access to the
Company's trade secrets or intellectual property, or disclose such intellectual
property or trade secrets, or that the Company can meaningfully protect its
intellectual property. A failure by the Company to meaningfully protect its
intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and operating results.
As a general matter, the semiconductor industry is characterized by
substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights.
The Company in the past has been and in the future may be notified that it may
be infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The Company has
certain indemnification obligations to customers with respect to the
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights by its products. There
can be no assurance that infringement claims by third parties or claims for
indemnification by customers or end users of the Company's products resulting
from infringement claims will not be asserted in the future or that such
assertions, if proven to be true, will not materially adversely affect the
Company's business, financial condition or operating results. In March 1997, the
Company received a written notice from legal counsel for Dr. Chou Li asserting
that the Company manufactures certain of its products in ways that appear to
such counsel to infringe a United States patent held by Dr. Li (the "Li
Patent"). After a review of its technology in light of such assertion, the
Company believes that the Company's processes do not infringe any of the claims
of this patent. On January 6, 1998, in a lawsuit between a third party and Dr.
Li filed in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the
court ruled that the Li Patent was invalid for inequitable conduct. On July 31,
1998, the Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation Limited Partnership
(the "Lemelson Partnership") filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Arizona against 26 companies, including the Company, engaged in the
manufacture and/or sale of IC products. The complaint alleges infringement by
the defendants of certain U.S. patents (the "Lemelson Patents") held by the
Lemelson Partnership relating to certain semiconductor manufacturing processes.
The complaint seeks, among other things, injunctive relief and unspecified
treble damages. Previously, the Lemelson Partnership has offered the Company a
license under the Lemelson patents. The Company is monitoring this matter and,
although the ultimate outcome of this matter is not currently determinable, the
Company believes, based in part on the licensing terms previously offered by the
Lemelson Partnership, that the resolution of this matter will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or liquidity;
however, there can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of this matter
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations
for any quarter. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Company would
prevail in any such litigation.
Any litigation relating to the intellectual property rights of third
parties, including, but not limited to the Lemelson Patents, whether or not
determined in the Company's favor or settled by the Company, would at a minimum
be costly and could divert the efforts and attention of the Company's management
and technical personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition or operating results. In the event of
any adverse ruling in any such matter, the Company could be required to pay
substantial
20
<PAGE>
damages, which could include treble damages, cease the manufacturing, use and
sale of infringing products, discontinue the use of certain processes or obtain
a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party claiming
infringement. There can be no assurance, however, that a license would be
available on reasonable terms or at all. Any limitations on the Company's
ability to market its products, any delays and costs associated with redesigning
its products or payments of license fees to third parties or any failure by the
Company to develop or license a substitute technology on commercially reasonable
terms could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and operating results.
International Sales
International sales (including sales to Canada) accounted for 40%, 42% and
44% of revenues in fiscal 1997, fiscal 1998 and the first quarter of fiscal
1999, respectively. The Company anticipates that international sales may
increase in future periods and may account for an increasing portion of the
Company's revenues. As a result, an increasing portion of the Company's revenues
may be subject to certain risks, including changes in regulatory requirements,
tariffs and other barriers, timing and availability of export licenses,
political and economic instability, difficulties in accounts receivable
collections, natural disasters, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign
subsidiary and branch operations, difficulties in managing distributors,
difficulties in obtaining governmental approvals for telecommunications and
other products, foreign currency exchange fluctuations, the burden of complying
with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and treaties and potentially adverse
tax consequences. Although less than nine percent of the Company's revenues were
attributable to sales in Asia during the three months ended June 30, 1998, the
recent economic instability in certain Asian countries could adversely affect
the Company's business, financial condition and operating results, particularly
to the extent that this instability impacts the sales of products manufactured
by the Company's customers. The Company is also subject to the risks associated
with the imposition of legislation and regulations relating to the import or
export of high technology products. The Company cannot predict whether quotas,
duties, taxes or other charges or restrictions upon the importation or
exportation of the Company's products will be implemented by the United States
or other countries. Because sales of the Company's products have been
denominated to date primarily in United States dollars, increases in the value
of the United States dollar could increase the price of the Company's products
so that they become relatively more expensive to customers in the local currency
of a particular country, leading to a reduction in sales and profitability in
that country. Future international activity may result in increased foreign
currency denominated sales. Gains and losses on the conversion to United States
dollars of accounts receivable, accounts payable and other monetary assets and
liabilities arising from international operations may contribute to fluctuations
in the Company's results of operations. Some of the Company's customer purchase
orders and agreements are governed by foreign laws, which may differ
significantly from United States laws. Therefore, the Company may be limited in
its ability to enforce its rights under such agreements and to collect damages,
if awarded. Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, financial condition and operating results.
Environmental Regulations
The Company is subject to a variety of federal, state and local
governmental regulations related to the use, storage, discharge and disposal of
toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in its manufacturing
process. Any failure to comply with present or future regulations could result
in the imposition of fines on the Company, the suspension of production or a
cessation of operations. In addition, such regulations could restrict the
Company's ability to expand its facilities at its present location or construct
or operate its planned wafer fabrication facility or could require the Company
to acquire costly equipment or incur other significant expenses to comply with
environmental regulations or clean up prior discharges. In this regard, since
1993 the Company has been named as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") along
with a large number of other companies that used Omega Chemical Corporation
("Omega") in Whittier, California to handle and dispose of certain hazardous
waste material. The Company is a member of a large group of PRPs that has agreed
to fund certain remediation efforts at the Omega site, which efforts are
ongoing. To date, the Company's payment obligations with respect to such funding
efforts have not been material and the Company believes that its future
obligations to fund such efforts will not have a material adverse effect on its
business, financial condition or operating results. Although the Company
21
<PAGE>
believes that it is currently in material compliance with applicable
environmental laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that the Company
is or will be in material compliance with such laws or regulations or that the
Company's future obligations to fund any remediation efforts, including those at
the Omega site, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition or operating results.
The Company uses significant amounts of water throughout its manufacturing
process. Previous droughts in California have resulted in restrictions being
placed on water use by manufacturers and residents in California. In the event
of future drought, reductions in water use may be mandated generally, and it is
unclear how such reductions will be allocated among California's different
users. There can be no assurance that near term reductions in water allocations
to manufacturers will not occur, which could have a material adverse affect on
the Company's business, financial condition or operating results.
Volatility of Stock Price
The market price of the Common Stock has fluctuated significantly to date.
In addition, the market price of the Common Stock could be subject to
significant fluctuations due to general market conditions and in response to
quarter-to-quarter variations in the Company's anticipated or actual operating
results; announcements or introductions of new products; technological
innovations or setbacks by the Company or its competitors; conditions in the
semiconductor, telecommunications, data communications, ATE, high-speed
computing or military markets; the commencement of litigation; changes in
estimates of the Company's performance by securities analysts; and other events
or factors. In addition, the stock market in recent years has experienced
extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of
many high technology companies, particularly semiconductor companies, and that
have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
companies. These fluctuations, as well as general economic and market
conditions, may affect adversely the market price of the Common Stock.
Year 2000 Compliance
Many currently installed computer systems and software products are coded
to accept only two digit entries in the date code field. These date code fields
will need to accept four digits to distinguish 21st century dates from 20th
century dates. Therefore, any of such computer systems and software products
that recognize a date code field of "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year
2000 could result in errors or system failures. As a result, many companies'
software and computer systems may need to be upgraded or replaced in order to
resolve the potential impact of this misinterpretation and the resulting errors
or system failures and to make such systems, equipment and software Year 2000
compliant. The Company has commenced taking actions to correct such internal
systems and is in the early stages of conducting an audit of its third party
suppliers as to the Year 2000 compliance of their systems. Failure of the
Company's internal computer systems or of such third-party equipment or
software, or of systems maintained by the Company's suppliers, to operate
properly with regard to the Year 2000 and thereafter could require the Company
to incur unanticipated expenses to remedy any problems, which could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and the
financial condition. Furthermore, the purchasing patterns of customers or
potential customers may be affected by Year 2000 issues as companies expend
significant resources to correct their current systems for Year 2000 compliance.
These expenditures may result in reduced funds available to purchase the
Company's products, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, operating results and financial condition.
Effect of Anti-Takeover Provisions
The Company's Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 2,000,000
shares of Preferred Stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences and
privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without
any further vote or action by the Company's stockholders. The rights of the
holders of Common Stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by,
the rights of the holders of any shares of Preferred Stock that may be issued in
the future. The issuance of Preferred Stock may delay, defer or prevent a change
in control of the Company, as the terms of the Preferred Stock that might be
issued could potentially prohibit the Company's
22
<PAGE>
consummation of any merger, reorganization, sale of substantially all of its
assets, liquidation or other extraordinary corporate transaction without the
approval of the holders of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock. In
addition, the issuance of Preferred Stock could have a dilutive effect on
stockholders of the Company. Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law, to which the Company is subject, restricts certain business combinations
with any "interested stockholder" as defined by such statute. The statute may
delay, defer or prevent a change of control of the Company.
23
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: October 15, 1998 Applied Micro Circuits Corporation
By: /s/ Joel O. Holliday
----------------------
Joel O. Holliday
Vice President, Finance and Administration
And Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Signatory and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
24
