<PAGE>
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______________ to _____________
Commission file number: 0-11635
LASER PHOTONICS, INC.
---------------------
(Name of small business issuer specified in its charter)
Delaware 59-2058100
-------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
2431 Impala Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008
---------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(760) 602-3300
--------------
(Issuer's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
------------------- -------------------
None None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
----------------------------------------
(Title of Class)
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [___]
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's Common Stock as of December 31,
1998, was 9,895,684 shares. The aggregate market value of the Common Stock
(9,763,417 shares) held by non-affiliates, based on the average of the bid and
asked prices ($5.94) of the Common Stock as of April 14, 1999 was $57,994,697.
<PAGE>
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (THE "REPORT") MAY BE DEEMED TO CONTAIN
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT OR
HEREAFTER INCLUDED IN OTHER PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION"), REPORTS TO THE COMPANY'S
STOCKHOLDERS AND OTHER PUBLICLY AVAILABLE STATEMENTS ISSUED OR RELEASED BY THE
COMPANY INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH
COULD CAUSE THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE (FINANCIAL OR OPERATING)
OR ACHIEVEMENTS TO DIFFER FROM THE FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE (FINANCIAL OR
OPERATING) OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. SUCH FUTURE RESULTS ARE BASED UPON MANAGEMENT'S BEST ESTIMATES BASED
UPON CURRENT CONDITIONS AND THE MOST RECENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. THESE RISKS
INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE RISKS SET FORTH HEREIN, EACH OF WHICH COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The following should be read in conjunction with the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto, contained
elsewhere in this Report. This Report contains forward-looking statements, which
involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ
significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the term "Company" refers to Laser
Photonics, Inc. a Delaware corporation ("Laser Photonics"), Laser Analytics,
Inc., a Massachusetts corporation ("Laser Analytic"), its wholly owned
subsidiary, and Acculase, Inc., a California corporation ("Acculase"), its 76.1%
owned subsidiary.
HISTORY OF THE COMPANY
The Company historically has pursued a strategy of development of a
wide range of laser products using different solid state lasers, including solid
state Ruby, Nd: YAG, frequency-doubled Nd: YAG and Alexandrite lasers, all for
medical applications. Since 1986, the Company has sold over 1,000 lasers,
usually on a private label basis to other manufacturers. This strategy proved to
be unsuccessful, in the opinion of current management of the Company as the
Company generated revenues from the sale of numerous of its products, but was
unable to operate profitably. See "Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
On May 13, 1994, the Company filed a Petition for Reorganization (the
"Bankruptcy Proceeding") under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act on May
13, 1994, Case No. 94-02608-611 - Federal Bankruptcy Court - Middle District,
Florida (the "Bankruptcy Court"). An order was issued on May 22, 1995 confirming
the Company's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization (the "Bankruptcy
Reorganization" or the "Plan"). The Company was subsequently authorized to
conduct its business operations as a debtor-in-possession subject to the
jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. The Plan included, among other things,
that in exchange for the forgiveness of certain unsecured debt, the Company
issued to its unsecured creditors shares of the Company's Common Stock, par
value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), such that, following the issuance of
all Common Stock to be issued under the Plan, the unsecured creditors owned
1,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, representing 20% of the issued
and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company. The shares of Common
Stock of the Company's prior existing stockholders were cancelled and reissued
into 250,000 shares of Common Stock, which represented 5% of the then total
issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.
The Plan further provided that Helionetics, Inc., ("Helionetics"), the
former parent of Acculase, transfer to the Company 76.1% of the common stock of
Acculase. Further, during the pendency of the Bankruptcy Proceeding, Helionetics
contributed $1,000,000 in cash to the Company, which funds were utilized for
cash payments under the Plan. Helionetics loaned to the Company $300,000 to fund
the cost of research and development of the Company's excimer lasers. Under the
Plan, Helionetics received 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company,
which represented 75% of the then total issued and outstanding shares of Common
Stock. All of the shares received by Helionetics were resold pursuant to an
exemption provided by the Plan and not pursuant to a registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"). As of the date
of this Report, Helionetics does not own any shares of the Company's Common
Stock.
Acculase was founded in 1985 for the purpose of commercializing
products that utilize its proprietary excimer laser and fiber optic
technologies. Acculase has focused primarily on the development of medical
products for the treatment of coronary heart disease.
The Acculase excimer laser power source was developed to perform a
variety of materials processing applications. The Acculase AL-1000M XeCl pulsed
excimer laser was developed for microsurgical applications. The first medical
2
<PAGE>
application of the AL-1000M excimer laser system was approved by the United
States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") under investigational device
exemption ("IDE") No. G920163 for use in the treatment of occlusive coronary
artery disease ("CAD") as an adjunct to coronary bypass surgery. Acculase chose
not to pursue completion of IDE No. G920163 because of difficulties in
recruiting patients into a randomized study comparing bypass surgery with
adjunctive Acculase laser angioplasty to bypass surgery alone.
Due to the limited financial resources of the Company, the Company's
strategy changed in 1997 to focus its efforts on the Company's excimer laser
technology in order to develop a broad base of excimer laser and excimer laser
delivery products for both medical and non-medical applications. The Company
believes that excimer laser technology provides the basis for reliable
cost-effective systems that will increasingly be used in connection with a
variety of applications. The Company is engaged in the development of
proprietary excimer laser and fiberoptic equipment and techniques directed
initially toward the treatment of coronary heart disease and psoriasis, as well
as other medical and non-medical applications.
BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
The Company is engaged in the development of proprietary excimer laser
and fiber optic equipment and techniques directed toward the treatment of
cardiovascular and vascular disease and the treatment of psoriasis. The Company
anticipates developing such equipment and technologies to treat other medical
problems as well as non-medical applications. However, no assurance to this
effect can be given.
The Company's initial medical applications for its excimer laser
technology are intended to be used in the treatment of: (i) cardiovascular
disease and (ii) psoriasis. The Company's cardiovascular and vascular
applications are in connection with an experimental procedure known as
transmyocardial revascularization ("TMR"), in which the Company's excimer laser
technology products relating to the treatment of cardiovascular and vascular
disease (the "TMR System") are currently in Phase I Human Clinical trials
(defined below). The Company and Baxter Healthcare Corporation ("Baxter") are
engaged in a strategic alliance for the development and marketing for excimer
laser products for TMR. The Company began testing its excimer laser system for
the treatment of psoriasis at Massachusetts General Hospital ("MGH") in 1998
with a Dose Response Study under Institutional Review Boards ("IRB") approval.
The final data from this study was collected in December, 1998. This data is
anticipated to serve as the basis for a 510 (k) submission to the FDA in the
third quarter of 1999. The Company believes the excimer laser psoriasis system
will be determined to be substantially equivalent to currently marketed devices.
However, no assurance to this effect can be given.
The Company entered into certain agreements with respect to the
manufacturing and marketing of its excimer lasers and delivery systems in 1997
with Baxter and MGH. Although the Company has developed strategic alliances with
Baxter and MGH related to the Company's excimer lasers, there can be no
assurances that the Company will ever develop significant revenues or profitable
operations with respect to this new business plan. See "Business-Strategic
Alliance with Baxter Healthcare Corporation" and "Business-Excimer Laser Systems
for the Treatment of Psoriasis."
Since the Company's laser system products are still in the clinical
trials stage, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to
successfully prove their anticipated benefits, obtain required governmental
approvals for their use, or reach anticipated markets ahead of competing
technologies and competitors.
In the non-medical applications of the excimer laser technology, the
Company intends to evaluate its technology as it applies as an illumination
source for use in deep ultraviolet ("DUV") photolithography systems for the
semiconductor manufacturing industry. There can be no assurances that the
Company's excimer laser systems will be developed into marketable products.
RELATIONSHIP WITH ACCULASE SUBSIDIARY. Laser Photonics owns 76.1% of
the issued and outstanding common stock of Acculase. In addition to Laser
Photonics, there are other stockholders of Acculase, including certain former
officers and directors of the Company. Helionetics is no longer a stockholder of
Acculase. Acculase owns certain technologies related to the Company's excimer
lasers and their delivery systems. The loss of any of these technologies to the
Company could have a material adverse effect upon the business of the Company.
See "Business - Strategic Alliance with Baxter Healthcare Corporation" and
"Business-Intellectual Property."
In the early 1990's, Acculase was unable to raise equity or debt
financing to further the development of its excimer laser technology
development. Only with the initial assistance of Helionetics and, that of Laser
Photonics, was Acculase able to obtain the capital needed to develop its excimer
laser products and, consequently, develop the business relationship with Baxter.
See "Business-Strategic Alliance with Baxter Healthcare Corporation."
3
<PAGE>
Of the stockholders of Acculase, only Laser Photonics participates in
the day-to-day management of Acculase or contributes any financing to the
operations or the development of Acculase. Laser Photonics has been required to
engage in significant financing activities since 1997 to obtain the funding
necessary to support Acculase's ability to develop its excimer laser products.
Laser Photonics has provided incentives and compensation to its management and
ongoing funding to develop and commercialize the excimer laser technology. See
"Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of of Operations" and "Item 13- Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
On September 18, 1997, the Company, Pennsylvania Merchant Group, Ltd.
("PMG"), the Company's investment banker, and Baxter agreed, in connection with
fulfilling the obligations of the parties under the Baxter Agreement, that the
Company needed to acquire a license (the "Lasersight License") from Lasersight
Patents, Inc. ("Lasersight"), an unrelated third party, for certain patents
which relate to the use of excimer lasers for the cardiovascular and vascular
markets. On September 23, 1997, Baxter purchased certain patent rights to
related patents from Lasersight for $4,000,000, and in December, 1997, the
Company received from Baxter a sublicense to these patent rights (the
"Lasersight License"). Laser Photonics then paid $4,000,000 to Baxter for the
transfer of the Lasersight License, having raised the funds from a private
placement of the Company's securities. In the event that Baxter terminates the
Baxter Agreement, Baxter will grant to the Company an exclusive sublicense of
all of Baxter's rights under the Lasersight License. In such event, the Company
will acknowledge and agree that upon the grant of such exclusive sublicense, the
Company will assume all obligations and liabilities of Baxter under the
Lasersight License. See "Business-Strategic Alliance with Baxter Healthcare
Corporation," "Business-Intellectual Property" and "Item 13.- Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."
Management of the Company believes that the provision of financing and
management assistance to Acculase has provided a significant benefit to Acculase
and the Acculase stockholders, other than the Company, and that Acculase could
not have obtained any of these benefits without the financial and management
assistance provided by Laser Photonics. The financing was obtained by the sale
of Laser Photonics securities. This has resulted in significant dilution in
ownership of Laser Photonics to the stockholders of Laser Photonics prior to
these financings. To rectify the potential inequity that has been created for
the stockholders, the Company's Board of Directors intends to make an offer to
the other stockholders of Acculase to acquire the 23.9% of Acculase not already
owned by the Company in exchange for shares of the Common Stock of the Company.
The exact terms of such offer are not yet known, nor can any assurance be given
that such offer, once made, will be on terms favorable to the Company or that
such offer will be accepted by such stockholders of Acculase. In the event that
such an offer is not accepted by enough of the Acculase stockholders to enable
the Company to own at least 90% of the issued and outstanding shares of
Acculase, the Company is not certain how it will proceed. The Company's Board of
Directors has not determined what action it will take if the other stockholders
of Acculase do not accept the Company's offer to acquire their shares of
Acculase.
EXCIMER LASERS TECHNOLOGY
The basis of the Company's business is its excimer laser technology. An
excimer laser uses a medium in which the dimers exist only in the excited state.
The Company uses xenon chloride gas as a medium, pumps electricity in and
generates excited dimers. This system creates and excites the dimers at the same
time. Once the power is shut off, the dimers cease to exist. This type of laser
usually, though not always, generates beams in the ultraviolet ("UV") end of the
light wave spectrum. The wavelength of the beam depends largely on the type of
gas used. In the case of the Company's laser technology, the wavelengths may
vary between 174 nm and 351 nm.
Many lasers cut things, but different lasers do so in different ways.
An excimer laser, sometimes called a "cold lasers," having photon energy greater
than most organic bonds, cuts organic material by directly breaking bonds that
hold the organic material together ("photoablation"). Other lasers, sometimes
called "hot laser," involve vibrating water molecules, which create steam, and
which in turn cut organic material ("thermal ablation").
4
<PAGE>
Management of the Company believes that a cold laser has significant
advantages over a hot laser. Certain of the Company's competitors are using
either a homium (Ho:YAG) laser technology or CO2 laser technology (both of which
are hot lasers). These technologies require a surgeon or cardiologist to send
one or more high-energy pulses of energy through the myocardium to create the
desired channels. The Company believes that its excimer laser technology has
significant advantages over the competition's laser technology for TMR. However,
no assurance to this effect can be given. See "Business-Competition."
Some of the companies attempting to develop laser driven TMR
technologies use flexible fibers capable of delivering the laser energy either
through a small incision in the chest or percutaneously through a catheter
inserted in the femoral artery in the groin. This method of delivering laser
energy has certain obstacles in optimizing the delivery of that energy.
Management of the Company believes that using an excimer laser has the following
additional benefits over hot lasers: (i) tissue ablation may be performed in the
absence of significant injury to neighboring tissues; (ii) creation of TMR
channels will avoid the formation of steam bubbles to the brain; (iii) the use
of an excimer laser is likely to cause less thermal damage to neighboring
tissues then that of a hot laser; and (iv) the excimer laser allows for the more
rapid creation of TMR channels leading to less operating room time. See
"Business Strategic Alliance with Baxter Healthcare Corporation."
EXCIMER LASER SYSTEM FOR TREATMENT OF TMR
GENERAL. Heart muscle, like all tissues of the body, must be constantly
supplied with oxygen in order to function effectively. Oxygen is delivered to
the myocardium by the blood, which is distributed to the myocardium through the
right and left coronary arteries. If these arteries are narrowed or blocked as a
result of atherosclerosis, oxygen-rich blood cannot supply the metabolic demand
of the myocardium. Cardiovascular disease eventually may cause ischemia
myocardium (oxygen-starved heart tissue), often evidenced by severe and
debilitating angina or chest pains caused by lack of oxygen to the heart muscle,
which can progress to myocardial infarction (the death of an area of the heart
muscle). Advanced multi-vessel ischemic heart disease is typically treated with
bypass surgery.
The Company has under development the TMR System for the treatment of
coronary heart disease in a procedure called TMR, a procedure that creates new
channels for blood to flow to ischemic (oxygen-starved) heart muscle tissue.
Rather than opening narrowed coronary arteries, the TMR System is intended to
treat ischemic myocardium directly. This is accomplished by lasing small
channels through ischemic areas of the heart, which connect directly with the
left ventricle of the heart, a reservoir of oxygen-rich blood. Management
believes that these channels may provide new pathways for blood flow into the
heart muscle. However, there can be no assurances to this effect.
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AND ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT METHODS. According to
the American Heart Association, cardiovascular disease, the partial or total
blockage of arteries, is the leading cause of death and disability in the United
States. Coronary artery disease accounts for approximately one million, or
one-half, of all deaths in the United States annually. Approximately 1,500,000
new cases of heart attacks or angina (chest pain due to heart disease) are
reported each year. Over 13,000,000 Americans suffer from coronary heart disease
and 350,000 new cases of heart disease are diagnosed every year in the United
States.
Atherosclerosis, the principal form of cardiovascular disease, is
characterized by a progressive narrowing of the coronary arteries due to
accumulated plaque (lesions) on the walls of the arteries, which supply
oxygenated blood to the heart, potentially resulting in angina and damage to the
5
<PAGE>
heart. Typically, the condition worsens over time and often leads to heart
attack or death. More than 6,000,000 Americans experience anginal symptoms per
year. Drug therapy may be effective for mild cases of coronary artery disease
and angina, either through medical effects on the arteries that improve blood
flow without reducing plaque or by decreasing the rate of formation of
additional plaque (i.e., by reducing blood levels of cholesterol).
The primary therapeutic options for treatment of coronary artery
disease are drug therapy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
("PTCA") or balloon angioplasty, including techniques, which augment or replace
PTCA, such as stent placement and atherectomy, and coronary artery bypass graft
surgery ("CABG") or open heart bypass surgery. The objective of each of the
different approaches is to increase blood flow through the coronary arteries to
the heart. According to the American Hospital Association, approximately 1,100
hospitals in the United States perform cardiovascular related surgical
procedures.
When these primary therapeutic options are exhausted, the patient is
left with no viable surgical alternative other than, in limited cases, heart
transplantation. Without a viable surgical alternative, the patient is generally
managed with drug therapy, but often with significant lifestyle limitations. TMR
offers potential relief to this large class of patients with severe
cardiovascular disease.
According to the 1998 Heart and Stroke Facts Statistics published by
the American Heart Association, approximately 573,000 coronary bypass operations
were performed on 360,000 patients and 434,000 balloon angioplasty procedures
were performed in the United States on approximately 408,000 patients in 1995.
The American Heart Association estimates the cost of cardiovascular disease in
1997 at $259.1 billion, including physician and nursing services, hospital and
nursing home services, medications and lost productivity resulting from
disability. Hospital charges for bypass surgery are typically between $25,000 to
$45,000, and bypass surgery requires prolonged hospitalization and extensive
recuperation periods.
CABG is an open chest procedure developed in the 1960s in which conduit
vessels are taken from elsewhere in the body and grafted to the blocked coronary
arteries so that blood can bypass the blockage. CABG typically requires use of a
heart-lung machine to render the heart inactive (to allow the surgeon to operate
on a still, relatively bloodless heart) and involves prolonged hospitalization
and patient recovery periods. Accordingly, it is generally reserved for patients
with severe cases of coronary artery disease or those who have previously failed
to receive adequate relief of their symptoms from PTCA or related techniques.
Unfortunately, most bypass grafts fail within one to fifteen years following the
procedure. Repeating the surgery ("re-do bypass surgery") is possible, but is
made more difficult because of scar tissue and adhesions that typically form as
a result of the first operation. The American Heart Journal estimates that 12%
of all CABG procedures in the United States are re-do bypass surgeries.
Moreover, for many patients, CABG is inadvisable for various reasons, such as
the severity of the patient's overall condition, the extent of coronary artery
disease or the small size of the blocked arteries.
PTCA is a less-invasive alternative to CABG, which was introduced as an
approved procedure in the early 1980s. PTCA is a procedure in which a
balloon-tipped catheter is inserted into an artery, typically near the groin,
and guided to the areas of blockage in the coronary arteries. The balloon is
then inflated and deflated at each blockage site, thereby rupturing the blockage
and stretching the vessel. Although the procedure is usually successful in
widening the blocked channel, the artery often renarrows within six months of
the procedure, a process called "restenosis," often necessitating a repeat
procedure. A variety of techniques for use in conjunction with PTCA have been
developed in an attempt to reduce the frequency of restenosis, including stent
placement and atherectomy. Stents are small metal frames delivered to the area
of blockage using a balloon catheter that is deployed or expanded within the
coronary artery. The stent is a permanent implant intended to keep the channel
open. Atherectomy is a means of using mechanical, laser or other techniques at
the tip of a catheter to cut or grind away plaque.
When these treatment options are exhausted, the patient is left with no
viable surgical alternative other than, in limited cases, heart transplantation.
Without a viable surgical alternative, the patient is generally managed with
drug therapy, often with significant lifestyle limitations. TMR, currently under
clinical investigation by the Company and certain other companies, offers
potential relief to a large class of patients with severe cardiovascular
disease. There are an estimated 120,000 people worldwide per year who qualify
for TMR under the conditions set forth above.
STRATEGIC ALLIANCE WITH BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION. On August 19,
1997, Acculase executed a series of agreements with Baxter. These agreements
(collectively, the "Baxter Agreement") provide for an alliance with Baxter in
which the Company granted to Baxter an exclusive worldwide right and license to
manufacture and sell certain of the Company's
6
<PAGE>
TMR Systems and disposable products associated therewith. The Company agreed to
manufacture the TMR System to the specifications of Baxter at a schedule of
prices, based upon the volume of TMR Systems purchased by Baxter from the
Company. Pursuant to the Baxter Agreement, the Company agreed, for a period of
five years, not to engage in any business competitive with the laser products
licensed by Baxter. The Company has granted to Baxter a security interest in all
of its patents to secure the Company's performance under the Baxter Agreement.
The Baxter Agreement expires upon the expiration of the last to expire of the
licensed patents, which is currently scheduled to expire in 2008. However,
Baxter may terminate the Baxter Agreement at any time upon five days' written
notice. Due to Baxter's strong worldwide marketing presence, relationships with
leading clinicians and regulatory expertise, Baxter is absorbing many of the
significant expenses of bringing the Company's TMR products to market. See
"Business-Intellectual Property," "Business-Research and Development" and
"Business-Markets and Marketing."
Pursuant to the terms of the Baxter Agreement, Baxter has paid Acculase
the sum of $1,550,000 in cash and Acculase has delivered the first two laser
systems. Payments made by Baxter aggregate $1,959,000, which include certain
advances for additional excimer laser systems and CE markings ("CE Mark")
compliance, which is a requirement for Baxter to sell the Company's TMR Systems
within the European Economic Area ("EEA"). In addition, Baxter has agreed to:
(i) pay to the Company a royalty of 10% of the sales price received for each
disposable product sold, or if the laser equipment is sold on a "per treatment"
basis, the imputed average sales price based on average sales other than on a
"per treatment" basis, calculated quarterly for such disposable products sold,
adjusted to amortize and recapture, over a 36-month period, Baxter's cost of
manufacturing such products; (ii) purchase from the Company certain existing
excimer laser systems for cardiovascular and vascular disease; (iii) fund the
total cost of obtaining regulatory approvals worldwide for the use of the TMR
System for the treatment of cardiovascular and vascular disease; (iv) fund all
sales and marketing costs related to the introduction and marketing of the TMR
System to treat cardiovascular and vascular disease; and (v) pay a per unit
price on a reducing scale from $75,000 to $45,000 per TMR System, based on the
number of TMR Systems purchased by Baxter. Prices for TMR Systems may be
adjusted annually after three years, based upon changes in costs of materials
(but not overhead or profit margin). See "Business-Government Regulation,"
"Business-Markets and Marketing," "Business-Competition" and
"Business-Intellectual Property."
As of the date of this Report, there have been no commercial sales of
the TMR System, other than to Baxter. The only sales made by Baxter have been to
research facilities for experimentation and for purposes of completing studies
of the efficacy of the TMR System for regulatory purposes. The Company has
received orders from Baxter for ten TMR Systems. Further, the Company has
delivered two laser systems in accordance with the Baxter Agreement and has been
paid pursuant thereto. The Company has received a deposit from Baxter in the
amount of $250,000 for the ten laser systems, which have not yet been delivered.
See "Business-Research and Development," "Business-Government Regulation" and
"Business-Markets and Marketing."
In September, 1997, the Company, PMG and Baxter agreed, in connection
with fulfilling the obligations of the parties under the Baxter Agreement, that
the Company needed to acquire the Lasersight License, for certain patents which
relate to the use of excimer lasers for the cardiovascular and vascular markets.
On September 23, 1997, Baxter purchased certain patents rights to related
patents from Lasersight for $4,000,000. In December, 1997, the Company acquired
from Baxter a license to the patent rights for $4,000,000, from the proceeds of
a private placement of the Company's securities. See "Business-Intellectual
Property" and "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
TMR TREATMENT USING EXCIMER LASERS. TMR is a surgical procedure
performed on the beating heart, in which a laser device is used to create
pathways through the myocardium directly into the heart chamber. The pathways
are intended to enable improved perfusion, or blood supply to the myocardium
from the heart chamber, reducing angina in the patient. TMR potentially can be
performed using any of several different surgical approaches, including open
chest surgery, minimally invasive surgery through small openings in the chest or
percutaneous surgery involving the use of a laser-tipped catheter threaded
through a peripheral artery. The Company is pursuing a treatment protocol using
small openings in the chest for better access to the myocardium. TMR is designed
to be less invasive and less expensive than bypass surgery. Also, TMR may be
useful in conjunction with angioplasty or bypass surgery to obtain more complete
revascularization. TMR potentially offers end-stage cardiac patients, who are
not candidates for PTCA or CABG, a means to alleviate their symptoms and improve
their quality of life. No assurance can be given that the TMR System will be
found to be effective in relieving symptoms of CAD or that it will receive
government approval for commercialization. See "Business-Government Regulation."
7
<PAGE>
The main challenge in treating atherosclerosis is to allow blood flow
to the heart muscle without significantly damaging the heart. TMR does not
target the coronary arteries for treatment. During the TMR procedure, the
patient is given general anesthesia, and an incision is made in the patient's
side between the ribs exposing the heart. Laser systems competitive with the
Company's TMR System use much greater energy and power levels, and are required
to synchronize the laser pulse with the electrocardiogram to protect the patient
from adverse arrhythmia's or excessive energy levels if the heart is not full of
blood acting as a laser pulse "backstop." The Company's TMR System does not need
this synchronization due to the lower overall power and energy requirements of
the excimer laser. Animal results have indicated that excimer laser channels
remain open for extended periods of time, whereas no such data is available from
any competitive companies which manufacture TMR type systems. Management
believes that these open channels may provide pathways for oxygenated blood from
the ventricle to the heart muscle to get into the heart muscle, which is the
ultimate purpose of such procedures as CABG and angioplasty. However, no
assurance to this effect can be given.
Based on clinical results to date, the Company believes that its TMR
System will provide the following benefits, including: (i) the use of the TMR
System may be used on patients as an alternative to bypass or angioplasty
procedures or on patients who would otherwise not be suitable for coronary
bypass surgery; (ii) the TMR System may allow the surgeon to provide oxygenated
blood to areas of the heart muscle that are not accessible by coronary bypass
grafts. With the advent of the procedures, where coronary artery bypass graft
surgery are performed on a beating heart, management believes that TMR will be
an effective complement to this procedure. TMR can be performed on the anterior,
posterior and lateral walls of the heart while the procedures usually are only
performed on the anterior wall of the heart; (iii) management believes that the
medical costs associated with the use of the TMR System will be less than the
costs of traditional bypass surgery, which requires a larger surgical team, more
supporting equipment and a longer hospital stay. The cost of TMR in some
situations may also be less than angioplasty when combinations of additional
devices such as atherectomy catheters, stents or intravascular ultrasound are
required; (iv) since the use of the TMR System is less invasive and does not
involve stopping and starting the heart, the patient may recover more quickly
than if conventional bypass techniques were used, with a potentially reduced
risk of complications compared with the risks associated with bypass surgery;
and (v) TMR may potentially be used on post-transplant patients suffering from
chronic rejection atherosclerosis. Presently, the only treatment for this
condition is re-transplantation.
No assurance can be given that any of these benefits will be obtained
by patients receiving TMR or that, if they are, such benefits will result in
revenues or profitable operations to the Company, or the FDA will approve the
TMR System. See "Business-Government Regulation."
EXCIMER LASER SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF PSORIASIS.
GENERAL. As of the date of this Report, the Company has developed an
excimer laser and laser delivery system for the treatment of psoriasis.
Psoriasis or autogenic skin cell proliferation is a chronic inflammatory skin
disease for which there is no known cure. Plaque psoriasis, the most common
form, is characterized by inflamed lesions topped with silvery white scales.
Psoriasis can be limited to a few plaques or it can cover moderate to extensive
areas of skin. No one knows exactly what causes psoriasis, although it is
believed to be an immune medical disorder. Normal skin cells mature in 28 to 30
days, but psoriasis skin cells take only three to six days to mature, thus
creating the silvery white scales.
According to the National Psoriasis Foundation ("NPF"), there are three
(3) approaches to treat psoriasis: topical therapy (creams and lotions),
phototherapy (ultraviolet light-UVA and UVB) and systemic medications. The
Company's excimer laser technology for the treatment of psoriasis, if
successful, is intended to replace and/or augment all of the current treatment
modalities.
The NPF estimates that between 1% to 3% of the world's population is
affected by psoriasis, that this medical condition affects more than 6.5 million
Americans and that between 150,000 and 260,000 new cases occur each year.
Approximately 75% of these cases have a mild form of the disease. Both genders
are affected by the condition, being slightly more prevalent among women.
Approximately 10% to 15% of the people who suffer from psoriasis are under the
age of ten. The NPF further estimates that patients suffering from psoriasis
make approximately 2.4 million visits to dermatologists each year and that the
overall current yearly cost to treat psoriasis may exceed $3 billion. In
addition to costs, the NPF estimates that 56 million hours of work are lost each
year by psoriasis sufferers. Approximately 400 people in the United States per
year die from complications caused by psoriasis. An additional 400 people per
year receive Social Security benefits for disability due to psoriasis symptoms
each year.
8
<PAGE>
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL AGREEMENT. On November 26, 1997, the
Company entered into a license agreement (the "MGH Agreement") with the General
Hospital Corporation, an unaffiliated third party, doing business as MGH,
pursuant to which the Company obtained an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing
license from MGH to commercially develop, manufacture, use and sell products,
utilizing certain technology of MGH, related to the diagnosis and treatment of
certain dermatological conditions and diseases, including psoriasis.
The Company has paid $37,500 to MGH in connection with the MGH
Agreement, and has further agreed to pay MGH $50,000 upon issuance by the United
States Patent and Trademark Office of any patent right (which has not yet
occurred as of the date of this Report) and an additional $50,000 upon approval
by the FDA of the first 510(k), PMA or PMA Supplement (which has not occurred as
of the date of this Report). Before a new medical device can be marketed, such
as the Company's excimer laser for the treatment of psoriasis, marketing
clearance must be obtained through a pre-market notification under Section
510(k) of the FDC Act or a PMA application under Section 515 of the FDA Act.
Beginning with the first commercial sale of the products in any country, on any
sales of products made anywhere in the world by the Company, or its affiliates
and sublicensees, the Company has agreed to pay royalties to MGH, as follows:
(i) 4% of the net sales price, so long as the products manufactured, used or
sold are covered by a valid claim of patent licensed exclusively to the Company;
(ii) 2% of the net sales price whenever the products manufactured, used or sold
are covered by a valid claim licensed exclusively to the Company; and (iii) 1%
of the net sales price whenever the products manufactured, used or sold, on
which no royalty is payable under items (i) and (ii) above, during the ten year
period following the first commercial sales anywhere in the world. In addition
to the royalties provided for above, the Company has agreed to pay MGH 25% of
any and all non-royalty income, including license fees and milestone payments,
received from affiliates or sublicensees of the Company. See
"Business-Intellectual Property."
The licensed technology is the subject of a currently pending
provisional patent application filed with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office by MGH. The Company has agreed to use its best efforts to develop and
make commercially available products with respect to the licensed technology
within certain time frames defined in the MGH Agreement, or MGH may have the
right to cancel the exclusive license or convert any exclusive license to a
non-exclusive license. See "Business-Intellectual Property."
On March 17, 1998, the Company entered into a clinical trial agreement
with the MGH (the "Clinical Trial Agreement") to compare the effect of excimer
laser light using its excimer laser technology to the current UVB treatment
being used to treat psoriasis. The Company provided prototype laser equipment
for pre-clinical dose response studies. The Company has agreed to support the
clinical trials with a research grant of approximately $160,000, of which
$50,000 has been paid as of the date of this Report. The final data from the
study was collected in December, 1998, but the final report has not been
received as of the date of this Report. This data is anticipated to serve as the
basis for a 510 (k) submission to the FDA in the third quarter of 1999. There
can be no assurances that the Company will be able to develop any products
utilizing the licensed technology within the contractual time frame, or at all.
See "Business-Excimer Laser System for the Treatment of Psoriasis,"
"Business-Government Regulation," "Business-Markets and Marketing,"
"Business-Competition" and "Business-Intellectual Property."
The Company believes that its excimer laser system may replace and/or
augment the current phototherapy modalities in use to treat the symptoms of
psoriasis. The Company will first test its excimer laser system, as it compares
to the UVB therapy currently being extensively used to control psoriasis. In
using UVB, the patient stands in a light box lined with special UVB lamps and
the whole body is radiated (other than protected areas such as eyes and
genitals). The need for long periods of treatment is due to the fact that the
healthy skin, as well as the psoriasis affected skin, is being treated in the
current light boxes, so that the dosage or radiation must be controlled or the
patient will be severely burned. The Company's excimer laser, however, can be
used to treat only the skin area that is affected by psoriasis. Since it is
believed that skin that is affected by psoriasis is not as susceptible to UVB
radiation, the Company believes that a high dose of UVB applied directly to the
affected area could significantly reduce the number of treatments and the time
9
<PAGE>
needed to control psoriasis. The Company has entered into an agreement with MGH
to study the affects of different dosages of UVB on psoriasis. This study, which
commenced in May, 1998, is anticipated to lead to the Company's submission of a
510(k) to the FDA, in the third quarter of 1999, requesting approval of the
Company's excimer laser system to be used to treat psoriasis. However, no
assurance to this effect can be given. See "Business- Government Regulation."
TREATMENT OF PSORIASIS USING EXCIMER LASERS. The Company expects that
the number of treatments that will be needed to control psoriasis using the
Company's excimer laser system should decrease from over 30 to less than 10.
Further, the Company estimates that the typical treatment time using the
Company's excimer laser will be greatly reduced. However, no assurance to this
effect can be given. The other benefits to the use of the Company's excimer
laser should be to reduce or eliminate the side effects of current treatment
modalities. UVB treatments have the same long term effects as chronic sun
exposure, which causes skin cancer and/or premature skin aging. It is hoped that
by treating only the psoriasis affected skin with the Company's excimer laser
equipment, total radiation dosage will be reduced, thereby reducing of the
chances of cancer and premature skin aging. However, no assurances to this
effect can be given.
The Company's excimer laser equipment that is designed to treat
psoriasis generates UV light with a wavelength of 308 nm. The UVB light
currently being used in phototherapy of psoriasis has a wavelength of 310 nm.
The Company believes that the Company's excimer laser system will be effective
in replacing the UVB light. The Company believes that the use of fiber optics to
deliver UV light allows for precise control of the light and an ability to
deliver the light to areas that are currently not excisable with standard
treatments (i.e., the scalp). The Company believes that its excimer laser system
should become the preferred method to treat many psoriasis plaques because
management believes that it can intensely treat affected areas without affecting
healthy skin with radiation that would otherwise cause adverse side effects.
Current UVB therapy cannot deliver such dosages without causing sickness as a
result of their radiation. The more intense excimer plaque doses will result in
faster and fewer visits, all with fewer side effects. The very narrow band of
radiation from the excimer laser will also help avoid potential mutanagenic
effects of broad band UV light sources. There can be no assurances that the
Company's excimer laser technology will be successful in treating psoriasis or
result in a commercially viable product. See "Business-Government Regulation."
On January 2, 1998, the Company and Rox Anderson, M.D. ("Anderson"),
entered into consulting agreement (the "Anderson Agreement") wherein Anderson
has agreed to provide consulting services to the Company in connection with an
IDE for the development of data in connection with the proposed psoriasis
products the Company is attempting to develop. Anderson is paid at the rate of
$1,000 per day when services are provided specifically at the request of the
Company.
SALE OF THE COMPANY'S NON-EXCIMER LASER ASSETS AND BUSINESS.
The Company's historical business strategy was the development of a
wide range of laser products using different solid state lasers. Since 1986, the
Company sold over 1,000 lasers, usually on a private label basis, to other
manufacturers. This strategy proved to be unsuccessful, in the opinion of
current management of the Company, as the Company generated revenues from the
sale of numerous of its products, but was unable to operate profitably. Due to
the limited financial resources of the Company, the Company's strategy changed
in 1997 to focus its efforts on excimer laser technology in order to develop a
broad base of excimer laser and excimer laser delivery products for both medical
and non-medical applications. To facilitate the Company's focus on excimer laser
technology, the Company is in the process of selling all of the Company's
non-excimer laser businesses.
The Company's non-excimer laser business that is being sold involve
laser applications and products which have been sold in two markets, medical
applications and scientific applications.
In the first of these markets, the Company developed a number of
medical lasers, such as Ruby Laser Systems, ND: YAG Laser Systems and
Alexandrite Laser Systems. Only the Ruby Laser System have generated any
meaningful revenues since 1995. Set forth below is a brief summary of the
Company's non-excimer medical laser systems and the Company's laser product for
treating psoriasis, which are being manufactured or upon which any of the
Company's resources are being expended.
RUBY LASER SYSTEM. The use of solid-state laser systems, such as
dermatology for the treatment of benign pigmented lesions of the skin, such as
nevus of ota, moles, age spots and tattoos, represents an extension of the
Company's scientific ruby laser technology, a technology that was one of the
earliest laser systems developed by the Company for commercial use. Laser energy
created by the ruby laser is highly absorbed by pigmented lesions, but poorly
absorbed by normal skin. Using the Ruby Laser System,
10
<PAGE>
therefore, allows the physician to treat effectively the skin lesion without
anesthesia and without causing normal pigmented changes or scarring. The Company
began manufacturing and shipping these systems in August, 1991 on a private
label basis. The manufacturing/distribution agreement with the customer
officially terminated in 1993. In May, 1995, the Company resumed production of
the ruby laser using a distributor network for marketing the product. Research
and development programs have been geared toward modification to allow long
pulse width operation for other dermatological applications, including hair
removal. Ruby lasers have shown the ability to remove hair without damage to the
surrounding tissue while removing the hair for long periods of time. Repeated
application may lead to permanent hair removal.
Ruby laser revenue for fiscal years ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and
1998, were $37,000, $180,000 and $65,000, respectively. Sales were limited due
to prolonged engineering time to develop the higher energy, longer pulse width
system and by the inability of the Company's customer to establish a strong
distribution network while awaiting the upgraded product.
SCIENTIFIC LASER SYSTEMS. The Company's scientific products have been
sold into niche markets for use principally in applications such as
spectroscopy, calibration, alignment and ultra-fast event measurement by
universities, government and private industry research laboratories. The Company
has manufactured and marketed scientific products based on a wide range of
technologies which include: nitrogen laser systems, nitrogen pumped dye laser
systems, solid state mid infrared laser systems, as well as laser diodes and
laser diode spectrometers. Set forth below is a brief summary of the Company's
current scientific laser systems:
In February, 1989, the Company acquired Laser Analytics, formerly a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Spectra Physics Inc., an unaffiliated third party.
Since the acquisition, the Company has funded continued development efforts
focused primarily on improvements in the production of tunable infrared laser
diodes. This technology uses a spectrometer based on the Company's tunable
infrared laser diode to measure naturally occurring, non-radioactive stable
isotopes in exhaled breath. These measurements are useful in diagnosing such
medical problems as diabetes, lung and liver dysfunction and digestive tract
diseases, such as the detection of helicobactor pylori, which has been shown to
be a precursor to liver and stomach cancer.
The Company's tunable diode lasers are based on lead-salt semiconductor
technology for use in advanced research, such as high-resolution molecular
spectroscopy, combustion diagnostic studies and atmospheric chemistry. These are
"high end" instruments designed for research, which require a high level of
sophistication and performance. These lasers are sold both as a standardized
unit and as a customized unit. In addition, the Company has designed a system
using the tunable diode laser technology for pollution monitoring applications.
As of January 4, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement for the
sale of certain assets (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") between the Company and
Laser Analytics, on the one hand, and Laser Analytics, Inc., a Texas corporation
(the "Buyer"), which is unaffiliated with the Company. The closing on the Asset
Purchase Agreement is scheduled to occur by the end of April, 1999. The Asset
Purchase Agreement provides that the Buyer will pay and/or assume an aggregate
of $1,200,000 of the accrued and unpaid accounts payable and/or other debts of
the Company. These debts include, but are not limited to the debt owed to the
Company's landlord in Orlando, Florida. The Comapny intends to tranfer to the
Buyer certain assets of Laser Photonics and Laser Analytics which are related to
the Company's non-excimer laser business. Completion of this transaction will
result in the sale of all of the Company's non-excimer laser business assets.
Management's decision to sell the assets of the Company's business operations
not related to the Company's excimer laser technology will result in the
divestiture of the Company's business operations which have generated
substantially all of the Company's revenues before December 31, 1997. As of the
date of this Report, the Company has received $30,000 as a good faith deposit
against the purchase price. No assurance can be given that the Buyer will
complete the purchase under the Asset Purchase Agreement, or if not, that the
Company will be able to find an alternative on as favorable terms as set forth
in the Asset Purchase Agreement. See "Business-Legal Proceedings-Lease Dispute."
SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF RAW MATERIALS.
Management believes that the Company currently has good relationships
with vendors of materials for medical and scientific lasers. Most major
components and raw materials, including solid state laser rods, laser crystals,
optics and electro-optic devices are available from a variety of sources. The
Company does not rely on sole source vendors. Cash flow constraints are the main
limiting factors in parts availability.
11
<PAGE>
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
UNITED STATES PRODUCT REGULATION. The Company's proposed products and
its research and development activities are subject to regulation by numerous
governmental authorities, principally, the FDA, and corresponding state and
foreign regulatory agencies. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ("FDC
Act"), the regulations promulgated thereunder, and other federal and state
statutes and regulations, govern, among other things, the pre-clinical and
clinical testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, labeling, storage, record
keeping, advertising and promotion of medical devices and drugs, including the
products currently under development by the Company. Product development and
approval within this regulatory framework takes a number of years and involves
the expenditure of substantial resources.
In the United States, medical devices are classified into three
different classes, class I, II and III, on the basis of controls deemed
necessary to reasonably ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. Class
I devices are subject to general controls (i.e. labeling, pre-market
notification and adherence to FDA's good manufacturing practice ("GMP")
requirements) and class II devices are subject to general and special controls
(i.e. performance standards, postmarket surveillance, patient registries and FDA
guidelines). Generally, class III devices are those which must receive premarket
approval by the FDA to ensure their safety and effectiveness (i.e.
life-sustaining, life-supporting and implantable devices, or new devices, which
have been found not to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed devices).
Before a new medical device can be marketed, such as the Company's
excimer laser for the treatment of psoriasis, marketing clearance must be
obtained through a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the FDC Act or
a PMA application under Section 515 of the FDA Act. A 510(k) clearance will
typically be granted by the FDA if it can be established that the device is
substantially equivalent to a "predicate device," which is a legally marketed
class I or II device or a preamendment class III device (i.e. one that has been
marketed since a date prior to May 28, 1976) for which the FDA has not called
for PMAs. The FDA has been requiring an increasingly rigorous demonstration of
substantial equivalence, which may include a requirement to submit human
clinical trial data. It generally takes four (4) to twelve (12) months from the
date of a 510(k) submission to obtain clearance, but it may take longer.
The FDA may determine that a medical device is not substantially
equivalent to a predicate device, or that additional information is needed
before a substantial equivalence determination can be made. A "not substantially
equivalent" determination, or a request for additional information, may prevent
or delay the market introduction of new products that fall into this category.
For any devices that are cleared through the 510(k) process, modifications or
enhancements that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness, or
that constitute a major change in the intended use of the device, will require
new 510(k) submissions.
A PMA application may be required, if a proposed device is not
substantially equivalent to a legally marketed class I or II device, or if it is
a preamendment class III device for which the FDA has called for PMAs. A PMA
application must be supported by valid scientific evidence to demonstrate the
safety and effectiveness of the device, typically including the results of
clinical trials, bench tests and laboratory and animal studies. The PMA must
also contain a complete description of the device and its components, and a
detailed description of the methods, facilities and controls used to manufacture
the device. In addition, the submission must include the proposed labeling,
advertising literature and any training materials. The PMA process can be
expensive, uncertain and lengthy, and a number of devices for which FDA approval
has been sought by other companies have never been approved for marketing.
Upon receipt of a PMA application, the FDA makes a threshold
determination as to whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a
substantive review. If the FDA so determines, the FDA will accept the
application for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA
begins an in-depth review of the PMA. The FDA review of a PMA application
generally takes one to three years from the date the PMA is accepted for filing,
but may take significantly longer. The review time is often significantly
extended by the FDA's asking for more information or clarification of
12
<PAGE>
information already provided in the submission. During the review period, an
advisory committee, typically a panel of clinicians, may be convened to review
and evaluate the application and provide a recommendation to the FDA as to
whether the device should be approved. The FDA accords substantial weight to,
but is not bound by, the recommendation. Toward the end of the PMA review
process, the FDA generally will conduct an inspection of the manufacturer's
facilities to ensure compliance with applicable GMP requirements, which include
elaborate testing, control documentation and other quality assurance procedures.
The Company has not yet undergone an FDA GMP inspection, and does not anticipate
that it will undergo such an inspection until after filing of an initial PMA
application by Baxter for the TMR System.
If FDA evaluations of both the PMA application and the manufacturing
facilities are favorable, the FDA may issue either an approval letter or an
approvable letter, which usually contain a number of conditions that must be met
in order to secure final approval of the PMA. When and if those conditions have
been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the FDA, the FDA will issue a PMA approval
letter, authorizing marketing of the device for certain indications. If the
FDA's evaluation of the PMA application or manufacturing facilities is not
favorable, the FDA will deny approval of the PMA application or issue a
"non-approvable" letter. The FDA may determine that additional clinical trials
are necessary, in which case the PMA may be delayed for one or more years, while
additional clinical trials are conducted and submitted in an amendment to the
PMA. Modifications to a device that is the subject of an approved PMA, its
labeling or manufacturing process, may require approval by the FDA of PMA
supplements or new PMAs. Supplements to a PMA often require the submission of
the same type of information required for an initial PMA, except that the
supplement is generally limited to that information needed to support the
proposed change from the product covered by the original PMA.
If human clinical trials of a device are required, either for a 510(k)
submission or a PMA application, and, in the opinion of the FDA, if the device
presents a "significant risk," the sponsor of the trial (usually the
manufacturer or the distributor of the device) must file an IDE application
prior to commencing human clinical trials. The IDE application must be supported
by data, typically including the results of animal and laboratory testing. If
the IDE application is approved by the FDA and one or more appropriate IRBs,
human clinical trials may begin at a specific number of investigational sites
with a specific number of patients, as approved by the FDA. If the device
presents a "nonsignificant risk" to the patient, a sponsor may begin the
clinical trial after obtaining approval for the study by one or more appropriate
IRBs without the need for FDA approval. Submission of an IDE does not give
assurance that the FDA will approve the IDE and, if it is approved, there can be
no assurance that FDA will determine that the data derived from the studies
support the safety and efficacy of the device or warrant the continuation of
clinical studies.
Sponsors of clinical trials are permitted to sell investigational
devices distributed in the course of the study, provided such compensation does
not exceed recovery of the costs of manufacture, research, development and
handling. An IDE supplement must be submitted to and approved by the FDA before
a sponsor or investigator may make a change to the investigational plan that may
affect its scientific soundness or the rights, safety or welfare of human
subjects.
The Company's TMR System is anticipated be regulated as a class III
medical device and to require PMA approval prior to being marketed in the United
States. Although the Company has received an IDE from the FDA permitting the
Company to conduct clinical trials of its TMR System in the United States, and
such clinical study has recently commenced, there can be no assurance that data
from such studies will demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the TMR
System or will adequately support a PMA application for the product. In the
first quarter of 1998, the IDE was transferred to Baxter from the Company in
connection with the Baxter Agreement. In addition, Baxter may be required to
obtain additional IDEs for other applications of the TMR System , and for other
products that the Company develops that are regulated by the FDA as medical
devices. There is no assurance that data, typically the results of animal and
laboratory testing, that may be provided by Baxter in support of future IDE
applications, will be deemed adequate for the purpose of obtaining IDE approval
or that the Baxter will obtain approval to conduct clinical studies of any such
future product.
Management of Acculase met with representatives of the FDA in January,
1995 to discuss preclinical data submission requirements necessary to initiate
human trials of the TMR System. Animal testing of the TMR System was then
performed in collaboration with several heart research institutions in the
United States, culminating in a study at The New York Hospital Cornell Medical
Center, which serves as the pre-clinical basis for an IDE that was granted by
the FDA in August, 1996. All of the Company's rights under the IDE have been
assigned to Baxter. Pursuant to this IDE, Phase I human clinical studies began
at New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center and at Good Samaritan Hospital in
Los Angeles, California. The IDE submission provides for the TMR System to be
used in open-heart procedures. The Phase I study only includes patients that are
suffering from ischemia and angina, and who are not candidates for CABG or for
13
<PAGE>
balloon angioplasty. Depending upon the outcomes of the Phase I study, Baxter
intends to petition for the Phase II studies before mid-1999. Baxter is
currently in discussion with the FDA for transition from Phase I to Phase II.
Baxter intends to expand the Phase II studies to a multi-site study (more than
10 institutions). However, no assurance to this effect can be given. The Company
does not expect Baxter to submit a PMA to the FDA before the year 2001, and
possibly later.
If clearance or approval is obtained, any device manufactured or
distributed by the Company will be subject to pervasive and continuing
regulation by the FDA. The Company will be subject to routine inspection by the
FDA and will have to comply with the host of regulatory requirements that
usually apply to medical devices marketed in the United States, including
labeling regulations, GMP requirements, Medical Device Reporting ("MDR")
regulation (which requires a manufacturer to report to the FDA certain types of
adverse events involving its products), and the FDA's prohibitions against
promoting products for unapproved or "off-label" uses. The Company's failure to
comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in enforcement
action by the FDA, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations.
The President signed into law the Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act of 1997. This legislation makes changes to the device
provisions of the FDC Act and other provisions in the FDC Act affecting the
regulation of devices. Among other things, the changes will affect the IDE,
510(k) and PMA processes, and also will affect device standards and data
requirements, procedures relating to humanitarian and breakthrough devices,
tracking and postmarket surveillance, accredited third party review and the
dissemination of off label information. The Company cannot predict how or when
these changes will be implemented or what effect the changes will have on the
regulation of the Company's products and anticipated products.
If the FDA believes that a company is not in compliance with law, it
can institute proceedings to detain or seize products, issue a recall, enjoin
future violations and assess civil and criminal penalties against that company,
its officers and its employees. Failure to comply with the regulatory
requirements could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, regulations
regarding the manufacture and sale of the Company's products are subject to
change. The Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that such changes might
have on its business, financial condition or results of operations.
In complying with the GMP regulations, manufacturers must continue to
expend time, money and effort in product, record keeping and quality control to
assure that the product meets applicable specifications and other requirements.
The FDA periodically inspects device manufacturing facilities in the United
States in order to assure compliance with applicable GMP requirements. The
Company is required by the FDA under GMP guidelines to carry certain inventories
of its medical lasers for emergency medical service. Typically, major service
problems must be responded to within 24 hours. The Company estimates that
$250,000 of service inventories is on hand at any given time for emergency
response. The Company is not required by any regulatory body to keep inventories
on hand to meet service or delivery issues. Certain raw materials have lead
times of greater than sixteen (16) weeks. The Company keeps a safety stock of
these items when appropriate. The Company estimates that less than $100,000 of
current inventory is set-aside for safety stock. Failure of the Company to
comply with the GMP regulations or other FDA regulatory requirements could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or
results of operations.
The Company is also subject to the Radiation Control for Health and
Safety Act with laser radiation safety regulations administered by the Center
for Devices and Radiological Health ("CDRH") of the FDA. These regulations
require laser manufactures to file new product and annual reports, to maintain
quality control, product testing and sales records, to incorporate certain
design and operating features in lasers sold to end users and to certify and
label each laser sold (except those sold to private label customers) as
belonging to one of four classes, based on the level of radiation from the laser
that is accessible to users. Various warning labels must be affixed and certain
protective devices installed, depending on the class of product. CDRH is
empowered to seek fines and other remedies for violations of the regulatory
requirements. To date, the Company has filed the documentation with CDRH for its
laser products requiring such filing, and has not experienced any difficulties
or incurred significant costs in complying with such regulations.
THIRD PARTY REIMBURSEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES. In the United States,
healthcare providers, including hospitals and physicians, that purchase devices
with medical applications for treatment of their patients, generally rely on
third-party payors, principally federal Medicare, state Medicaid and private
health insurance plans, to reimburse all or a part of the costs and fees
associated with the procedures performed using these devices. The Company's
14
<PAGE>
ultimate success will be dependent upon, among other things, the ability of
healthcare providers to obtain satisfactory reimbursement from third-party
payors for medical procedures in which the laser and delivery system products
are used. The TMR System is generally purchased by hospitals, which then bill
various third-party payors, such as government programs and private insurance
plans, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. Unlike balloon
angioplasty and atherectomy, laser angioplasty requires the purchase of
expensive capital equipment. Third-party payors may deny reimbursement if they
determine that a prescribed device has not received appropriate regulatory
clearances or approvals, is not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment
methods as determined by the payor, or is experimental, unnecessary or
inappropriate. If the FDA clearance or approval is received, third-party
reimbursement would also depend upon decisions by Health Care Financing
Administration ("HCFA") for Medicare, as well as by individual health
maintenance organizations, private insurers and other payors.
Certain third-party payors, such as Medicare, determine whether to
provide coverage for a particular procedure and then reimburse hospitals for
inpatient medical services at a prospectively fixed rate based on the diagnosis
related group ("DRG") to which the case is assigned. DRG assignment is based on
the diagnosis of the patient and the procedures performed. The fixed rate of
reimbursement established by Medicare is independent of the hospital's cost
incurred for the specific case and the specific devices used. Medicare and other
third-party payors are increasingly scrutinizing whether to cover new products
and the level of reimbursement for covered products. The Company intends to work
with government officials to secure a DRG assignment for its TMR System that
would provide hospitals with appropriate payment. A failure by the Company to
secure approval of a DRG that adequately reflects the costs associated with use
of the Company's TMR System could have a material adverse effect on its
business, financial condition and results of operations. Baxter has begun an
effort to educate the different segments of the market concerning reimbursement
for TMR procedures. It is important that the hospital and physician providers,
the insurance industry, the health plan underwriters, employers and patients
understand the clinical and economic benefits of TMR, as indicated by the IDE
studies. Study results are concurrent with the quality of care and economic
issues currently driving the healthcare market. The market for the Company's
products also could be adversely affected by future legislation to reform the
nation's healthcare system or by changes in industry practices regarding
reimbursement policies and procedures.
In February, 1997, HCFA published a national non-coverage instruction
for TMR based on its belief that scientific evidence substantiating the safety
and effectiveness of TMR was not currently available. It is not unusual for HCFA
to deny reimbursement for procedures performed using devices that have not yet
received FDA approval. The non-coverage instruction applies to procedures
performed on or after May 19, 1997, on Medicare beneficiaries. In April, 1999,
HCFA announced that as of July 1, 1999, Medicare intermediaries and carriers
would be instructed to cover the costs of TMR for patients with certain severe
angina, which has not responded to standard medical treatment. No assurance can
be given that HCFA's policy change will result in the generation of revenue to
the Company.
Third-party payors that do not use prospectively fixed payments
increasingly use other cost-containment processes that may pose administrative
hurdles to the use of the Company's products. Potential purchasers must
determine whether the clinical benefits of the Company's TMR Systems justifies
the additional cost or the additional effort required to obtain prior
authorization or coverage and the uncertainty of actually obtaining such
authorization or coverage.
Physician services are reimbursed by Medicare based on a physician fee
schedule coding system. There is no assurance the codes that will be used for
submitting claims for TMR procedures using the Company's products will result in
Medicare payment levels that physicians consider to be adequate. These codes and
their associated weights are used by many other third-party payors, in addition
to Medicare. A failure by physicians to receive what they consider to be
adequate reimbursement for the TMR procedures, in which the Company's products
are used, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
INTERNATIONAL PRODUCT REGULATION. For the Company to market its TMR
System and psoriasis products in the EEA and certain other foreign countries,
the Company must obtain certain regulatory approvals and clearances and
otherwise comply with extensive regulations regarding product safety,
manufacturing processes and quality. These regulations, including the
requirements for approvals or clearance to market and the time required for
regulatory review, vary from country to country. The Company is preparing to
apply for CE Mark approval to market its TMR System in the EEA. The CE Mark is
granted to companies whose products meet the essential requirements of the EEA
and provides the regulatory approval necessary for commercialization in Europe.
The Company may rely, in some circumstances, on Baxter, for the receipt of
premarket approvals and compliance with clinical trial requirements in certain
countries where Baxter intends to market its TMR products. Any enforcement
action by regulatory authorities with respect to past or future regulatory
noncompliance could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
15
<PAGE>
The time required to obtain approval for sale in foreign countries may
be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval for United States sales
and the requirements may differ. In addition, there may be foreign regulatory
barriers other than premarket approval. The FDA must approve exports of devices
that require a PMA, but are not yet approved domestically, unless they are
approved for sale by any member country of the EEA and the other "listed"
countries, including Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Switzerland
and South Africa, in which case they can be exported for sale to any country
without prior FDA approval. In addition, an unapproved device may be exported
without prior FDA approval to the listed countries for investigational use in
accordance with the laws of those countries. To obtain FDA export approval when
required, Baxter must provide the FDA with data and information to demonstrate
that the device: (i) is not contrary to public health and safety; and (ii) has
the approval of the country to which it is intended for export. To allow the FDA
to determine that export of a device is not contrary to public health and
safety, Baxter is required to submit basic data regarding the safety of the
device, unless the device is the subject of an FDA-approved IDE and the device
will be marketed or used for clinical trials in the importing country for the
same intended use, or at least two IRBs in the United States have determined
that the device is a non-significant risk device and the device will be marketed
or used for clinical trials in the importing country for the same intended use.
Baxter also must submit a letter to the FDA from the foreign country approving
importation of the device.
To sell its products within the EEA, consisting of the countries of the
European Union ("EU"), Norway and Iceland, the Company is required to meet the
requirements of the EEA and to affix the CE Mark on its products to attest to
such compliance. To comply, the Company's products must meet the "essential
requirements" relating to safety and performances and the Company must
successfully undergo verification of its regulatory compliance ("conformity
assessment") by a "notified body" selected by the Company. Under EEA
regulations, the Company's excimer laser products are in class III, the highest
risk class, and therefore, are subject to the most rigorous controls. In
addition to having to comply with the requirements of any particular country,
the authorities have the right to prohibit a particular investigation and impose
specific conditions.
Once the Company has obtained the CE Mark approval for its excimer
laser products, it will be subject to continued supervision by the notified body
and will be required to report any serious adverse incidents to the appropriate
authorities. The Company has received ISO 9001/EN46001 certification, which is
required to meet the CE mark certification prerequisites. The Company also will
be required to comply with additional national requirements that are outside the
scope of EEA regulations. As of the date of this Report, no application has been
made outside the United States. Baxter anticipates that it will be in a position
to distribute the TMR System in Europe and Japan, once the necessary filings
have been approved. No assurance can be given that distribution will occur when
anticipated by Baxter, if at all. Even if distribution begins, no assurance can
be given that distribution of the TMR System by Baxter will result in sales of
the TMR System or revenues of profits to the Company.
FOREIGN THIRD PARTY REIMBURSEMENTS. If the Company obtains the
necessary foreign regulatory registrations or approvals, market acceptance of
the Company's products in international markets would be dependent, in part,
upon the availability of reimbursement within prevailing healthcare payment
systems. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets
vary significantly by country, and include both government sponsored healthcare
and private insurance. Although Baxter intends to seek international
reimbursement approvals, there can be no assurance any such approvals will be
obtained in a timely manner, if at all. Failure to receive international
reimbursement approvals could have a material adverse effect on market
acceptance of the Company's products in the international markets in which such
approvals are sought.
The Company believes the overall escalating cost of medical products
and services has led, and will continue to lead, to increased pressures on the
healthcare industry, both foreign and domestic, to reduce the cost of products
and services, including products offered by the Company. There can be no
assurance in either United States or international markets that third-party
reimbursement and coverage will be available or adequate, that current
reimbursement amounts will not be decreased in the future or that future
legislation, regulation or reimbursement policies of third-party payors will not
otherwise adversely affect the demand for the Company's products or its ability
to sell its products on a profitable basis. The unavailability of third-party
payor coverage or the inadequacy of reimbursement could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, fundamental reforms in the healthcare industry in the United States
and Europe continue to be considered, although the Company cannot predict
whether or when any healthcare reform proposals will be adopted and what impact
such proposals might have.
16
<PAGE>
Reimbursement systems in international markets vary significantly by
country and by region within some countries, and reimbursement approvals must be
obtained on a country-by-country basis. Many international markets have
government managed healthcare systems that control reimbursement for new devices
and procedures. In most markets, there are private insurance systems as well as
government managed systems. There can be no assurance that reimbursement for the
Company's products will be available in the United States or in international
markets under either government or private reimbursement systems, or that
physicians will support and advocate reimbursement for procedures using the
Company's products. Failure by hospitals and other users of the Company's
products to obtain reimbursement from third-party payors, or changes in
government and private third-party payors' policies toward reimbursement for
procedures employing the Company's products, would have a material adverse
effect on the Company's ultimate business prospects. Moreover, management is
unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation, if any, relating to
the healthcare industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted
in the future, or what effect such legislation or regulation would have.
DEPENDENCE ON NEW CUSTOMERS
The Company recognized revenue from Baxter equaling 33% of gross
revenues for the year ended December, 1998. No single customer, other than
Baxter, accounted for sales in excess of 10% in 1998.
PRODUCT WARRANTIES
The Company's standard warranty on most products is one year for parts
and labor. Consumables have a ninety (90) day warranty period. Selected medical
products have a 12-month parts only warranty. During the warranty period, the
Company pays shipping charges one way. In connection with the Baxter Agreement,
the Company has agreed to warrant products for twelve (12) months from the date
of delivery to Baxter's customer or eighteen (18) months from the date shipped
by the Company, whichever is less. The Company warrants that the product is free
from defects in workmanship, materials and handling. The Company has established
a reserve for warranty costs based upon the estimated costs to be incurred over
the warranty period of the Company's products. The Company does not provide the
right to return units of its TMR System. In some cases, demonstration equipment
is sent to the customer prior to the sale to determine suitability. In rare
cases, the Company has allowed returns when accompanied by a substantial
restocking fee. See "Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations."
PRODUCT LIABILITY INSURANCE
The Company maintains liability insurance with coverage limits of
$3,000,000 per occurrence. Although the Company has never been subject to a
product liability claim, there can be no assurance that the coverage limits of
the Company's insurance policies will be adequate or that one or more successful
claims brought against the Company would not have a material adverse effect upon
the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company's research and development emphasis has shifted from pure
research to product modification and development to meet new market demands.
Baxter does not pay for any research and development for the Company's
cardiovascular and vascular related product applications. However, Baxter is
paying for all costs related to regulatory matters, which, if successful, will
enable the commercial sales of the Company's excimer laser system for TMR
pursuant to the Baxter Agreement. The Company's strategy is to utilize and
modify its existing excimer laser technology and component base to develop new
products and applications in targeted medical and scientific markets. In
addition to internal development, the Company may take advantage of
opportunities, if they arise, in the current laser market environment of
consolidation and market specialization by continuing to seek out and acquire
both products and technology at a cost the Company believes to be lower than the
cost of similar products internal development.
The Company began testing its excimer laser system for the treatment of
psoriasis at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1998 with a Dose Response Study
under IRBs approval. The final data from this study was collected in December,
1998. This data is anticipated to serve as the basis for a 510(k) submission to
the FDA in the third quarter of 1999. The Company will expend significant
amounts for research and development in the development of the excimer laser
products for psoriasis. See "Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
17
<PAGE>
The Company does not have any present acquisition plans. Because the
Company products are focused in specific niche scientific and medical markets,
the Company does not believe the decline in research and development
expenditures will affect the Company's abilities to be competitive in its
markets.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
The Company's medical lasers are not believed to cause any
environmental concerns. The Company does not knowingly use any products known to
harm the environment. All solvents and cleaners are biodegradable. Cooling
systems, where applicable, use refrigerant which are free of toxic materials.
Many medical lasers are solid-state construction, so no hazardous gases or
liquid dyes are used in their operation or manufacture. In winter months,
medical laser cooling systems are filled with an ethylene glycol and water
mixture to prevent freezing during shipment. This mixture must be removed and
discarded upon installation. Once the asset sale is completed this will no
longer be an issue for the Company.
The Company's TMR Systems utilizes xenon-chloride gas as a lasing
medium. The chlorine component of this gas is extremely corrosive and must be
handled with care. Although only a small quantity of gas is present in each
laser, proper handling is essential for safe operation. Depleted gas is reacted
prior to disposal. Excimer lasers are common in hospitals and laboratories and
the disposal and handling of these gases is well known. Management of the
Company believes that the use of these gases is not expected to impact the
desirability of these lasers in the market place.
MARKETS AND MARKETING
In connection with the Baxter Agreement, the Company will market its
TMR Systems under the Baxter name. Baxter has also assumed the obligation to
fund the total costs of obtaining regulatory approvals worldwide for the use of
the TMR System for the treatment of cardiovascular and vascular disease and to
fund all sales and marketing costs relating to the introduction and marketing of
the TMR System to treat cardiovascular and vascular disease. The Company does
not anticipate that Baxter will be ready to market the TMR System in the United
States prior to the end of 2001. Due to Baxter's strong worldwide market
presence, relationships with leading clinicians and regulatory expertise, many
of the significant expenses of bringing some of the Company's excimer laser
systems to market are being absorbed by Baxter. In the opinion of management of
the Company, because of the significant costs being borne by Baxter because of
the favorable terms of the Baxter Agreement, the Company's earnings potential
has not been compromised by the Baxter Agreement whereas the Company's risk
related to development and introduction of its TMR System has been shifted to
Baxter. It is anticipated that, once government approval has been received for
marketing of the Company's TMR System, the relationship with Baxter will be a
significant marketing and competitive advantage to the Company. However, no
assurance to this effect can be given.
The Company historically has marketed its scientific products through a
direct sales force in the United States and through a network of distributors
outside of the United States. The Company has promoted its products through
attendance at tradeshows, advertising in scientific journals and industry
magazines and direct mail programs. The Company has not yet determined how it
will market its excimer laser system for the treatment of psoriasis. It may be
favorable for the Company to use its traditional source of independent
18
<PAGE>
representatives to sell the Company's product for the treatment of psoriasis or
to find a strategic alliance with another company, such as the one that it
currently has with Baxter. No assurance can be given that such an alliance can
be obtained, and if obtained, that such alliance would be on terms favorable to
the Company.
AGREEMENT WITH COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION. On October 29, 1998, the
Company and Computer Sciences Corporation ("CSC") through CSC Healthcare-Life
Sciences Practice group entered into an agreement (the "CSC Agreement"), whereby
CSC is to develop a commercial strategy, define required execution resources and
obtain required resources for the commercial exploitation of the Company's
excimer laser technology. CSC provides consulting services to various
businesses, including the Company, regarding the introduction of medical
technology for commercialization. CSC has earned for its consulting services
through the payment of approximately $231,100 in fees and expenses. In addition
to the fees that have been accrued in 1998, the Company is to pay to CSC an
additional $157,600 as contingent compensation at such time as the Company
raises no less then $6,000,000 in equity. Warwick Alex Charlton, Vice President
of CSC is also the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company. See "Item
10 - Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant" and "Item 13 - Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."
COMPETITION
The markets for the Company's proposed products are extremely
competitive. The Company directly and indirectly competes with other businesses,
including businesses in the laser industry. In many cases, these competitors are
substantially larger and more firmly established than the Company. In addition,
many of such competitors have greater marketing and development budgets and
substantially greater capital resources than the Company. Accordingly, there can
be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve and maintain a
competitive position in the Company's industry. The Company believes that its
competitive success will be based on its ability to create and maintain
scientifically advanced technology, attract and retain scientific personnel,
obtain patent or other protection for its products, obtain required regulatory
approvals and manufacture and successfully market its products either directly
or through outside parties.
The Company does not have comparable resources with which to invest in
research and development and advertising and is at a competitive disadvantage
with respect to its ability to develop products. The Company may also encounter
difficulties in customer acceptance because it is likely to be perceived as a
new entrant into the market whose identity is not yet well known and whose
reputation and commercial longevity is not yet established. Substantial
marketing and promotional costs, possibly in excess of what the Company can
afford, may be required to overcome barriers to customer acceptance. The Company
expects substantial direct competition, both from existing competitors and from
new market entrants. Larger and more established competitors may seek to impede
the Company's ability to establish a market share for any products, which may be
developed by the Company through competitive pricing activities. Also,
prospective customers for the Company's products may be reluctant to disrupt
relationships with well-established distributors of products, which may be
comparable in quality, or pricing to any of the Company's products. The failure
to gain customer acceptance of the Company's excimer laser technology would have
a material adverse effect on the Company.
Market acceptance of laser treatment of psoriasis is dependent on the
Company's ability to establish with the medical community the clinical efficacy
of excimer laser technology to treat psoriasis. As a result of such factors,
there can be no assurance that the marketplace will be receptive to excimer
laser technology over competing therapies. Failure of the Company's products to
achieve market acceptance would have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Competition in the market for the treatment of coronary artery disease,
and in the medical device industry generally, is intense and is expected to
increase. The Company competes primarily with other producers of TMR systems for
patients with end stage heart disease. Many companies, research institutes and
universities are working in a number of disciplines to develop therapeutic
devices and procedures aimed at vascular and cardiovascular disease. Some of the
Company's competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater name
recognition and capital resources than does the Company and also may have
greater resources and expertise in the areas of research and development,
obtaining regulatory approvals, manufacturing and marketing. There can be no
assurance the Company's competitors will not succeed in developing TMR products
or procedures that are more effective or more effectively marketed than products
marketed by the Company or that render the Company's technology obsolete. In
addition, even if the Company's products yield performance comparable to
competing products, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain
necessary regulatory approvals to compete against competitors in manufacturing,
marketing and selling its products. The Company believes that the primary
competitive factors in the interventional cardiovascular market are: the ability
to treat safely end stage heart disease patients; the impact of managed care
practices and procedure costs; ease of use; and research and development
capabilities. Certain companies, including PLC Systems, Inc. ("PLC") and Eclipse
Surgical Technologies, Inc. (Eclipse"), have completed enrollment in randomized
clinical trials of products and procedures involving TMR that compete with those
offered by the Company, and have received regulatory approvals in Europe to
begin commercially marketing their respective TMR products. PLC and Eclipse have
received approval from the FDA to commercially market its TMR products in the
United States. Earlier entrants in the market in a therapeutic area often obtain
and maintain greater market share than later entrants. Furthermore, the length
of time required for products to be developed and receive regulatory approval
and the ability to use patents or other proprietary rights to prevent sales by
competitors are also important competitive factors.
19
<PAGE>
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY. The Company regards its technological
processes and product designs as proprietary and seeks to protect its rights in
them through a combination of patents, internal procedures and non-disclosure
agreements. The Company also utilizes licenses from third parties for processes
and designs used by the Company, which are proprietary to other parties. The
Company believes that its success will depend in part on the protection of its
proprietary information and patents, and the acquisition of licenses of
technologies from third parties.
There can be no assurances as to the range or degree of protection any
patent or registration which may be owned or licensed by the Company will
afford, that such patents or registrations will provide any competitive
advantages for the Company, or that others will not obtain patents or
registrations similar to any patents or registrations owned or licensed by the
Company. There can be no assurances that any patents or registrations owned or
licensed by the Company will not be challenged by third parties, invalidated,
rendered unenforceable or designed around, or that the Company's competitors
will not independently develop technologies, which are substantially equivalent
or superior to the technologies owned or licensed by the Company and which do
not infringe patents or proprietary rights of the Company. There can be no
assurances that the Company or any licensor to the Company will be successful in
protecting its proprietary rights. There can be no assurances that any pending
patent or registration applications or future applications will result in the
issuance of a patent or registration.
To the extent that the Company relies upon trade secrets and unpatented
know-how, and the development of new products and improvements of existing
products in establishing and maintaining a competitive advantage in the market
for the Company's products and services, there can be no assurances that such
proprietary technology will remain a trade secret or be available to the
Company, or that others will not develop substantially equivalent or superior
technologies to compete with the Company's products and services.
Any asserted claims or litigation to determine the validity of any
third party infringement claims could result in significant expense to the
Company or any licensor of such technology and divert the efforts of the
Company's technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is
resolved in favor of the Company or any such licensor. In the event of an
adverse result in any such litigation, the Company or any such licensor could be
required to expend significant time and resources to develop non-infringing
technology or to obtain licenses to the disputed technology from third parties.
There can be no assurances that the Company or any such licensor would be
successful in such development or that any such licenses would be available to
the Company on commercially reasonably terms, if at all.
Although the Company believes its patents to be of significant value,
successful litigation against these patents by a competitor could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and
20
<PAGE>
results of operations. No assurance can be given that the existing patents will
be held valid if challenged, that any additional patents will be issued or that
the scope of any patent protection will exclude competitors. The breadth of
claims in medical technology patents involves complex legal and factual issues,
and therefore, can be highly uncertain.
The Company also relies upon unpatented proprietary technology and
trade secrets that it seeks to protect, in part, through confidentiality
agreements with employees and other parties. No assurance can be given that
these agreements will not be breached, that the Company will have adequate
remedies for any breach, that others will not independently develop or otherwise
acquire substantially equivalent proprietary technology and trade secrets or
disclose such technology or that the Company can meaningfully protect its rights
in such unpatented technology. In addition, others may hold or receive patents,
which contain claims that may cover products developed by the Company.
PATENTS ISSUED. The Company owns 26 patents and Acculase owns an
additional 5 patents, worldwide. 22 of the Company's patents are in the United
States and there are one each in Canada, Switzerland, France and Great Britain.
Of the 5 patents owned by Acculase, all are filed in the United States, two
patents are in each of Australia, Canada, Israel, and one is in the EU, France,
Germany, Japan, Switzerland/Liechtenstein and Great Britain.
In connection with the sale of assets related to the Company's
non-excimer laser business, certain of the Company's patents are being sold to
the Buyer of those assets. All of the patents being sold relate to non-excimer
laser technology. No assurance can be given that the sale of assets will be
completed. See "Business - Sale of the Company's Non-Excimer Laser Assets and
Business."
In connection with the Company's excimer laser technology, the Company
has been issued two patents. The first patent, which was issued in January,
1990, provides patent protection until 2007 and covers the Company's base
excimer laser design. The second patent, which was issued in May, 1990, provides
patent protection until 2007 and covers a liquid filled flexible laser light
guide. The third patent, which was issued in May, 1991, provides patent
protection until 2007, and covers a means of measuring optical fiber power
output. The fourth patent, which was issued in September, 1991, provides patent
protection until 2008 and relates to the laser optical fiber coupling apparatus
used in the Company's excimer lasers. The Company also has one U.S. patent
application pending relating to a proprietary laser catheter design, which
application was initially denied. The Company has not continued to pursue this
patent application.
The Company also received patents for its base excimer laser design in
Australia in November, 1991, Canada in December, 1992, and Israel in February,
1993. The Australian, Canadian, and Israeli patents provide protection until
August, 2004, December, 2009, and August, 2008, respectively. Patent
applications are pending in these countries and in Japan for a fiber optic laser
catheter design.
All of the patents issued to the Company and all applications for
Letters Patent related to the Company's excimer laser technology have been
pledged by the Company to Baxter pursuant to the Baxter Agreement and act a
security for the obligations of the Company under and pursuant to the Baxter
Agreement. See "Business - Strategic Alliance with Baxter Healthcare
Corporation."
LICENSED TECHNOLOGY. In September 18, 1997, the Company, PMG and Baxter
agreed, in connection with fulfilling the obligations of the parties under the
Baxter Agreement, that the Company needed to acquire a license from Lasersight
for certain patents which relate to the use of excimer lasers for the
cardiovascular and vascular markets. On September 23, 1997, Baxter purchased
certain patent rights to related patents from Lasersight for $4,000,000, and in
December, 1997, Baxter granted the Company a sublicense to these patent rights.
The Company paid $4,000,000 to Baxter for the transfer of the Lasersight
License, having raised the funds from a private placement of the Company's
securities. In the event that Baxter terminates the Baxter Agreement, Baxter
will grant to the Company an exclusive sublicense of all of Baxter's rights
under the Lasersight License. In such event, the Company will acknowledge and
agree that upon the grant of such exclusive sublicense, the Company will assume
all obligations and liabilities of Baxter under the Lasersight License. See
"Business-Strategic Alliance with Baxter Healthcare Corporation,"
"Business-Intellectual Property" and "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions."
On November 26, 1997, the Company entered into the MGH Agreement with
the General Hospital Corporation, an unaffiliated third party, doing business as
MGH, pursuant to which the Company obtained an exclusive, worldwide,
royalty-bearing license from MGH to commercially develop, manufacture, use and
sell products, utilizing certain technology related to the diagnosis and
treatment of certain dermatological conditions and diseases, including
psoriasis.
21
<PAGE>
The Company has paid to MGH $37,500 pursuant to the MGH Agreement and
has agreed to pay to MGH $50,000 upon issuance by the United States Patent and
Trademark Office of any patent right $50,000 upon approval by the FDA of the
first 510(k), PMA or PMA Supplement, which has not occurred as of the date of
this Report. Beginning with the first commercial sale of the products in any
country, on any sales of products made anywhere in the world by the Company, or
its affiliates and sublicensees, the Company has agreed to pay royalties, as
follows: (i) 4.00% of the net sales price so long as the products manufactured,
used or sold are covered by a valid claim of patent licensed exclusively to the
Company; (ii) 2.00% of the net sales price whenever the products manufactured,
used or sells is covered by a valid claim of patent licensed exclusively to the
Company; and (iii) 1% of the net sales price whenever the products manufactured,
used or sold on which no royalty is payable under items (i) and (ii) above,
during the ten year period following the first commercial sales anywhere in the
world. In addition to the royalties provided for above, the Company has agreed
to pay MGH 25% of any and all non-royalty income, including license fees and
milestone payments received from affiliates or sublicensees of the Company. See
"Busines - Massachusetts General Hospital Agreement."
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 1999, the Company had 14 full-time employees. These
employees include four (4) executive officers, four (4) technical, four (4)
administrative and two (2) clerical personnel. The Company intends to hire
additional personnel as the development of the Company's business makes such
action appropriate. The loss of the services of such key employees as Chaim
Markheim and Raymond A. Hartman could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business. Since there is intense competition for qualified personnel
knowledgeable of the Company's industry, no assurances can be given that the
Company will be successful in retaining and recruiting needed personnel. See
"Management."
The Company's employees are not represented by a labor union or covered
by a collective bargaining agreement, and the Company believes it has good
relations with its employees. The Company provides its employees with certain
benefits, including health insurance.
RISK FACTORS
This Report may be deemed to contain forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements in this Report or hereafter included in other
publicly available documents filed with the Commission, reports to the Company's
stockholders and other publicly available statements issued or released by the
Company involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which
could cause the Company's actual results, performance (financial or operating)
or achievements to differ from the future results, performance (financial or
operating) or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Such future results are based upon management's best estimates based
upon current conditions and the most recent results of operations. These risks
include, but are not limited to, risks set forth herein, each of which could
adversely affect the Company's business and the accuracy of the forward-looking
statements contained herein.
There is a limited public market for the Company's Common Stock.
Persons who may own or intend to purchase shares of Common Stock in any market
where the Common Stock may trade should consider the following risk factors,
together with other information contained elsewhere in the Company's reports,
proxy statements and other available public information, as filed with the
Commission, prior to purchasing shares of the Common Stock:
22
<PAGE>
LACK OF PROFITABILITY AND HISTORY OF LOSSES; BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING. On
May 13, 1994, the Company filed the Bankruptcy Proceeding with the Bankruptcy
Court. On May 22, 1995, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Company's Plan. The
Company incurred losses of $5,357,968, $2,307,151 and $5,908,587 for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. As of December 31, 1998,
the Company had an accumulated deficit of $15,697,470. The Company expects to
continue to incur significant operating losses over at least the next two years
as it continues to devote significant financial resources to product development
activities and as the Company expands its operations. In order to achieve
profitability, the Company will have to manufacture and market products, which
are accepted on a commercial basis. There can be no assurance given that the
Company will manufacture or market any products successfully, operate profitably
in the future, or that the Company will not require significant additional
financing in order to accomplish the Company's business plan. See "Business,"
"Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations," "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions" and "Financial Statements."
NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING AND POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT DILUTION TO
SHAREHOLDERS. The Company has historically financed its operations through
working capital provided from operations, loans and the private placement of
equity and debt securities. The Company has significant debts, which will
require additional financing in order to repay such debts in full. The Company
has approximately $1,300,000 of cash on hand, as of March 31, 1999. The Company
will require additional financing to implement the Company's business plan. The
Company's day-to-day operations require cash of approximately $150,000 per month
or an aggregate of $2,700,000 over the next eighteen (18) months. In addition,
management believes that the Company will require approximately $1,200,000 over
the next twelve (12) month period following the date of this Report to finance
continued development of its psoriasis laser system. Additional amounts may be
required to pay various costs of operations such as professional and consulting
fees.
Management believes that approximately $750,000 of anticipated revenues
will be generated from the sale of lasers to Baxter under the Baxter Agreement
in 1999. Approximately $1,200,000 of the Company's debts may be assumed by the
purchaser of the Company's non-excimer laser assets and business. However, no
assurance to this effect can be given. Therefore, to finance its business plan,
the Company will be required to raise debt or equity of at least $5,000,000
before the end of the third quarter of 1999 to sustain the required levels of
operations for a period of at least twelve (12) months following the date of
this Report. Upon completion of the development of the psoriasis product, the
Company anticipates the need for as much as $50,000,000 over and above the
initial $5,000,000. to finance the marketing plan for the Company's psoriasis
product. No assurance can be given that Baxter will honor the Baxter Agreement
or that additional financing will become available to the Company, or at all, or
that the business of the Company will ever achieve profitable operations.
Further, any additional financing may be senior to the Company's Common Stock or
result in significant dilution to the holders of the Company's Common Stock. In
the event the Company does not receive any such financing or generate profitable
operations, management may have to suspend or discontinue its business activity
or certain components thereof in its present form or cease operations
altogether. See "Business-Excimer Laser System for the Treatment of Psoriasis",
"Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources," "Item 8 - Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data," and "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions."
POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS IN OPERATING RESULTS. Results of operations are
expected to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon
numerous factors, including the timing and results of clinical trials; delays
associated with the FDA and other regulatory approval processes; healthcare
reform and reimbursement policies; demand for the Company's products; changes in
pricing policies by the Company or its competitors; the number, timing and
significance of product enhancements and new product announcements by the
Company and its competitors; the ability of the Company to develop, introduce
and market new and enhanced versions of the Company's products on a timely
basis; customer order deferrals in anticipation of new or enhanced products
offered by the Company or its competitors; product quality problems; personnel
changes; and changes in Company strategy. Quarter to quarter operating results
could also be affected by the timing of the receipt of individual customer
orders, order fulfillment and revenue recognition with respect to small numbers
of individual laser units, since each unit carries a high price per unit. See
"Business-Government Regulation," "Business-Markets and Marketing," and
"Business-Competition," and "Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
23
<PAGE>
POSSIBLE LACK OF NET INCOME DUE TO HIGH AMORTIZATION OF GOODWILL AND
PATENT EXPENSES. The Company's business depends on the exploitation of a number
of technologies, some of which are the subject of patents. For financial
statement purposes, the Company is required to amortize the cost of acquisition
of these patents and patent licenses over a period of years. In addition,
acquisitions of business operations and reorganization of existing operations
have required the Company to record certain assets as goodwill on its financial
statements and to amortize such goodwill over periods of years. Reorganization
Goodwill (defined below) is amortized over five years, license fees paid are
amortized over the life of the license and patent expenses are amortized over
the life of the patent. The impact on the current and future financial
statements of the Company is a reduction of net income in the amount of such
amortization. For 1998, the total of such amortization was $1,028,035. This
amount of amortization, when compared to the Company's revenue for such years,
will make it very difficult for the Company to show profitability until net
revenues from operations increase significantly or until most of the items
requiring amortization have in fact been completely amortized. However, even if
the Company's net revenues increase to an amount to offset existing levels of
amortization, no assurance can be given that in future years the Company will
not incur other expenditures or undergo other reorganizations which will require
it to book significant amounts of amortization. No assurance can be given that
the Company will ever earn enough net revenue to offset most or all of its then
current amount of amortization expenses. See "Item 7 - Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Financial
Statements."
POSSIBLE FURTHER DILUTION FROM ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK TO PAY DEBTS OF
THE COMPANY. Historically, the Company has issued its securities to raise
capital to pay its current and long term obligations and support operations. A
significant portion of the money raised by the Company has been used to loan
money to Acculase, the Company's 76.1% owned subsidiary. Management of the
Company believes that the financing has provided significant benefits to
Acculase and that without the financing provided by Laser Photonics, Acculase
could not have obtained any of these benefits. To accomplish the development of
the excimer laser product, through the raising of capital through stock sales,
there has been significant dilution in stock ownership to the stockholders of
Laser Photonics. The Company anticipates being required to raise additional
capital over the next eighteen (18) months to meet the Company's operational
requirements. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be
available on terms favorable to the Company, if at all. To the extent that
additional capital is raised through the sale of additional equity or
convertible securities, the issuance of such securities could result in
additional dilution to the Company's stockholders. No assurance can be given
that there will not be further significant dilution to existing stockholders of
the Company to continue to finance the operations of Acculase, which dilution
and cost of financing is not borne by the other stockholders of Acculase. See
"Business-Business of the Company-Relationship with Acculase Subsidiary," "Item
7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources," "Item 13 - Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions" and "Financial Statements."
RISKS OF OWNING LESS THEN 100% OF THE SHARES OF ACCULASE. Acculase is
Laser Photonics' 76.1% owned subsidiary. Due to the inability of Acculase to
raise financing to capitalize the development of its excimer lasers, Laser
Photonics engaged in significant financing activities in 1997, 1998 and 1999
through the date of this Report and provided incentives and compensation to
management of Laser Photonics and ongoing funding to develop and commercialize
the Company's excimer laser technology. As of December 31, 1998, Acculase owes
to Laser Photonics the sum of $4,741,000. To accomplish the development of the
excimer laser business, there has been significant dilution in ownership to the
stockholders of Laser Photonics from the raising of capital for the Company,
which capital was used to benefit the other stockholders of Acculase through
loans to Acculase. The Company's Board of Directors intends to make an offer to
the other stockholders of Acculase to acquire the shares of common stock of
Acculase representing the 23.9% of Acculase not already owned by the Company in
exchange for shares of the Common Stock of the Company. The exact terms of such
offer are not yet determined. No assurance can be given that there will not be
further dilution to existing stockholders of the Company in order to finance the
operations of Acculase, which dilution and cost of financing may be borne by the
stockholders of Laser Photonics and, that the offer to acquire the other shares
of Acculase, once made, will be on terms favorable to the Company or that such
offer will be accepted by the other stockholders of Acculase. The Company's
Board of Directors has not determined what action it will take if the other
stockholders of Acculase do not accept the Company's offer to acquire their
shares of Acculase. See "Business - Relationship with Acculase Subsidiary,"
"Business-Intellectual Property" and "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions."
SALE OF CERTAIN REVENUE GENERATING ASPECTS OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS.
Management is in the process of selling all of the Company's non-excimer laser
business operations. This proposed transaction is scheduled to close in April,
1999. No assurance can be given that that this proposed transaction will
24
<PAGE>
close when scheduled. The effect of this transaction will be to divest the
Company of the business operations which, although have never been profitable,
have generated sales revenues for the years ended December 31, 1997, and 1998 of
$2,960,330 and $1,580,422, respectively. The Company has retained its excimer
lasers and laser delivery systems for TMR and psoriasis related to the business
operations of Acculase. Although the Company has developed a strategic alliance
with Baxter (resulting in receipts as of the date of this Report of $1,959,000)
related to the Company's excimer technology, there can be no assurances that the
Company will ever develop significant revenues or profitable operations with
respect to the Company's current business plan. See "Business," "Item 7 -
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources," "Item 13 - Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions" and "Financial Statements."
DEPENDENCE ON THIRD PARTIES FOR MANUFACTURE AND MARKETING OF PRODUCTS
AND RISKS OF ACCESS TO ALTERNATIVE SOURCES AND DELAYS. The Company does not
currently have sufficient financial resources to conduct human clinical trials
necessary to commercialize the application of the laser and delivery system to
cardiovascular and vascular applications for medical use. The Company has
entered into the Baxter Agreement, pursuant to which Baxter has agreed to fund
and market the Company's laser technology for cardiovascular and vascular
applications. However, Baxter may terminate such funding and marketing
commitment and cease further funding at any time. Should Baxter terminate the
Baxter Agreement, the Company will have to seek out other parties for the
marketing of its products. The Company believes that third parties would have an
economic incentive to provide such assistance for the Company due to the fact
that the Company's excimer laser products are believed by management of the
Company to be technically superior and less expensive than lasers from other
manufacturers used for the same medical applications. However, no assurance to
this effect can be given. Management of the Company believes that this alone
could make a strategic alliance or similar business relationship with the
Company attractive to another Company, which might assume Baxter's
responsibilities under the Baxter Agreement, although no assurance to this
effect can be given.
There can be no assurance that any third party would be willing or able
to meet the Company's needs in a satisfactory and timely manner, if at all.
Should the Company be unable to locate third parties willing or able to meet the
Company's needs, management may have to suspend or discontinue its business
activities or certain components thereof or cease operations altogether. The
amount and timing of resources to be devoted to these activities are not within
the control of the Company, and there can be no assurance that manufacturing and
marketing problems will not occur in the future.
Production of the Company's lasers requires specific component parts
obtained from certain suppliers. In the event that such suppliers cannot meet
the Company's needs, the Company believes that alternative suppliers could be
found. However, a change in suppliers or any significant delay in the Company's
ability to have access to such resources would have a material adverse effect on
the Company's delivery schedules, business, operating results and financial
condition. See "Business- Sources and Availability of Raw Materials."
The Company maintains limited manufacturing facilities which may need
to be expanded in the future. The Company estimates that it will only be able to
produce 200 lasers per year in its facility in Carlsbad, California. Should
demand exceed that number of lasers, the Company's facilities will have to be
expanded. Although certain members of the Company's management have
manufacturing experience, the expansion of the Company's manufacturing
facilities and capabilities will subject the Company to numerous risks,
including unanticipated technological problems or delays. Such expansion will
also require additional sources of capital, which may not be available on
commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If demand for the Company's products
becomes great enough to require expansion of its manufacturing capability and if
the Company is unable to expand its manufacturing capabilities, the Company may
be required to enter into arrangements with others for the manufacture and
packaging of its products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to enter into any such arrangements on commercially reasonable terms, or at
all, or that the Company will ever be able to establish the capability to
manufacture its products on a commercial basis, in which case the Company's
business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially
adversely affected. See "Business - Alliance with Baxter Healthcare Corporation"
and "Business - Research and Development."
UNCERTAIN MARKET ACCEPTANCE. The cost of the Company's products may be
significantly greater than the cost of therapeutic capital equipment required
with balloon angioplasty, stent implantation or atherectomy procedures in the
case of TMR.
25
<PAGE>
Market acceptance of laser TMR for end stage heart disease patients. will
depend, in part, on Baxter's ability to establish, with the medical community,
the clinical efficacy of excimer laser TMR. The use of excimer laser technology
to treat psoriasis has never been used before and once introduced, if
introduced, will compete with established methodologies of treating the symptoms
of psoriasis. Market acceptance of laser treatment of psoriasis is dependent on
the Company's ability to establish, with the medical community, the clinical
efficacy of excimer laser technology to treat psoriasis. As a result of such
factors, there can be no assurance that the marketplace will be receptive to
excimer laser technology over competing therapies. Failure of the Company's
products to achieve market acceptance would have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See
"Business-Government Regulation," "Business-Markets and Marketing" and
"Business-Competition."
HIGHLY COMPETITIVE MARKETS; RISK OF ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES. Competition
in the market for the treatment of CAD, and in the medical device industry
generally is intense and is expected to increase. The Company's TMR System, if
approved for general sale by the FDA, will compete primarily with other
suppliers of TMR equipment for the treatment of patients with end stage heart
disease. Companies producing competitive products may succeed in developing
products that are more effective or less costly in treating coronary disease
than the TMR System, and may be more successful than the Company in
manufacturing and marketing their products. In the TMR market, the Company
competes primarily with other producers of TMR Systems. Many companies, research
institutes and universities are working in a number of disciplines to develop
therapeutic devices and procedures aimed at vascular and cardiovascular disease.
The Company's requirements for regulatory approval, and marketing of
some of its products for cardiovascular and vascular disease have been assumed
by Baxter. The Company's competitors and many of its potential competitors have
substantially greater capital resources than does the Company. There can be no
assurance the Company's competitors will not succeed in developing TMR products
or procedures that are more effective or more effectively marketed than products
marketed by Baxter or that render the Company's technology obsolete. Even if the
Company's products provide performance comparable or superior to competing
products, there can be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain necessary
regulatory approvals to compete against competitors in terms of manufacturing,
marketing and sales. PLC and Eclipse received regulatory approvals in Europe to
begin marketing their various TMR products and received approval from the FDA to
market their TMR products in the United States. Earlier entrants in the market
in a therapeutic area often obtain and maintain greater market share than later
entrants. The Company believes the primary competitive factors in the market for
TMR systems include clinical performance, product safety and reliability,
availability of third-party reimbursement, product design specifically for TMR
use, product quality, ease of use, price, customer service and company
reputation. In addition, the length of time required for products to be
developed and receive regulatory approval and the ability to use patents or
other proprietary rights to prevent sales by competitors are also important
competitive factors. Many of the medical indications that may be treatable with
TMR are currently being treated by drug therapies or surgery and other
interventional therapies, including CABG and PTCA. A number of these therapies
are widely accepted in the medical community, have a long history of use and
continue to be enhanced frequently. There is no assurance that procedures using
TMR will be able to replace or augment such established treatments or that
clinical research will support the use of TMR. Additionally, new surgical
procedures and new drug therapies are being developed by other parties to treat
CAD. New procedures and drug therapies could be more effective, safer or more
cost-effective than TMR. The inability of TMR to replace or augment existing
therapies or to be more effective, safer or more cost-effective than new
therapies could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. See "Business - Government
Regulation," "Business - Markets and Marketing" and "Business - Competition."
NO MARKETING STUDIES. No independent studies with regard to the
feasibility of the Company's proposed business plan have been conducted at the
expense of the Company or by any independent third parties with respect to the
Company's present and future business prospects and capital requirements. In
addition, there can be no assurances that the Company's products will find
sufficient acceptance in the marketplace to enable the Company to fulfill its
long and short term goals, even if adequate financing is available and products
are ready for market, of which there can be no assurance. See "Business."
26
<PAGE>
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL. The Company is dependent upon the skills
of its management and technical team. There is strong competition for qualified
personnel in the laser industry, and the loss of key personnel or an inability
to continue to attract, retain and motivate key personnel could adversely affect
the Company's business. The Company has no employment agreements with any of the
Company's key employees. There can be no assurances that the Company will be
able to retain its existing key personnel or to attract additional qualified
personnel. The Company does not have key-person life insurance on any of its
employees. See "Item 10 - Directors and Executive Officers of Registrant."
GOVERNMENT REGULATION; NO ASSURANCE OF REGULATORY APPROVALS. Clinical
testing, manufacture, promotion and sale of the Company's products are subject
to extensive regulation by numerous governmental authorities in the United
States, principally the FDA, and corresponding foreign regulatory agencies. The
FDC Act, and other federal and state statutes and regulations govern or
influence the testing, manufacture, labeling, advertising, distribution and
promotion of medical devices. Noncompliance with applicable requirements can
result in fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products,
total or partial suspension of production, refusal to authorize the marketing of
new products or to allow the Company to enter into supply contracts and criminal
prosecution. The Company's excimer laser devices for the various applications
discussed in this Report will be regulated as either a Class II or Class III
medical device. Class II devices may claim "substantial equivalence" to an
existing (predicate) device, and may receive approval the 510(k) process from
the FDA. Some Class II devices may not be found "substantially equivalent" to
existing devices, and may be assigned a new classification, which may or may not
require further clinical data or which may have certain restrictions including
post-market surveillance. Furthermore, it is unusual, but possible, that the FDA
will assign a new Class II device to a PMA device. Class II devices for which
there is no predicate device require a PMA. FDA approval of a PMA must be
obtained prior to commercial distribution in the United States. A PMA
application must be supported by extensive information, including preclinical
and clinical trial data. The PMA process is expensive, lengthy and uncertain,
and a number of products for which PMA applications have been submitted by other
companies have never been approved for marketing. If granted, the approval of
the PMA application may include significant limitations on the indicated uses
for which a product may be marketed. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to obtain necessary PMA application approvals to market its excimer
laser systems for all or any, of the currently anticipated applications, or any
other products, on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to obtain or delays in
receipt of such approvals, the loss of previously received approvals, or failure
to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Although the Company has received and transfered to Baxter a
conditionally approved IDE from the FDA, permitting the Company to conduct
clinical trials of the TMR System, and such clinical study has recently
commenced, there can be no assurance that data from such studies will
demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the TMR System for the treatment of
TMR or will adequately support a PMA application for the TMR System. In
addition, Baxter will be required to obtain additional IDEs for other
applications of the Company's excimer laser technology. There can be no
assurance that data, typically the results of animal and laboratory testing,
that may be provided by the Company in support of future IDE submissions, will
be deemed adequate for the purposes of obtaining IDE approval or that the
Company will obtain approval to conduct clinical studies of any such future
product. Even if IDE approval is obtained and clinical studies are conducted,
there can be no assurance that data from such studies will demonstrate the
safety and effectiveness of any such product or will adequately support a PMA
application for any such product. Manufacturers of medical devices are also
required to comply with applicable FDA GMP requirements, which include standards
relating to product testing and quality assurance as well as the corresponding
maintenance of records and documentation. There is no assurance that the Company
will be able to comply with applicable GMP requirements. See
"Business-Government Regulation."
NEED TO COMPLY WITH INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT REGULATION. International
sales of medical devices often are subject to regulatory requirements in foreign
countries, which vary from country to country. Sale and use of the Company's
products are subject to pre-market approval in the EU and subject to other
regulatory requirements in those and other countries. The time required to
obtain approval for sale in foreign countries may be longer or shorter than
required for FDA approval, and the requirements may differ materially. In
addition, there may be foreign regulatory barriers other than pre-market
approval. The FDA must approve exports of devices that require a PMA, but are
not yet approved domestically, unless they are approved for sale by any member
country of the EU or the other "listed" countries, including Australia, Canada,
Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Switzerland and South Africa, in which case they can
be exported for sale to any country without prior FDA approval. In addition, an
unapproved device may be exported without prior FDA approval to the
27
<PAGE>
listed countries for investigational use in accordance with the laws of those
countries.
To sell its TMR Systems within the EEA, the Company will have to
receive approval to affix CE Mark on its products to attest to the Company's
compliance with the requirements of the EEA. The Company also will be required
to comply with additional individual national requirements that are outside the
scope of those required by the EEA. In addition, the Company has received ISO
9001/EN 46001 certification, which is required to meet the CE Mark certification
prerequisites. The Company has not received CE Mark certification for the sale
of its TMR System in the EEA. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory
requirements can result in fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recalls or
seizures of products, total or partial suspensions of production, refusals by
foreign governments to permit product sales and criminal prosecution.
Furthermore, changes in existing regulations or adoption of new regulations or
policies could prevent the Company from obtaining, or affect the timing of,
future regulatory approvals or clearances. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to obtain necessary regulatory clearances or approvals on a
timely basis or at all or that the Company will not be required to incur
significant costs in obtaining or maintaining such foreign regulatory approvals.
Delays in receipt of, or failure to receive, such approvals or clearances, the
loss of previously obtained approvals or clearances or the failure to comply
with existing or future regulatory requirements would have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
See "Business-Government Regulation-International Product Regulation."
UNCERTAINTY RELATED TO THIRD-PARTY REIMBURSEMENT. In the United States,
healthcare providers that purchase devices with medical applications for
treatment of their patients generally rely on third-party payers, principally
federal Medicare, state Medicaid and private health insurance plans, to
reimburse all or a part of the costs and fees associated with the procedures
using these devices. The Company's ultimate success will be dependent upon,
among other things, the ability of healthcare providers to obtain satisfactory
reimbursement from third-party payers for medical procedures in which the laser
and delivery system products are used. Unlike balloon angioplasty and
atherectomy, the use of laser technology for TMR requires the purchase of
expensive capital equipment. Third-party payors may deny reimbursement if they
determine that a prescribed device has not received appropriate regulatory
clearances or approvals, is not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment
methods as determined by the payor, or is experimental, unnecessary or
inappropriate. If the FDA clearance or approval were received, third-party
reimbursement would also depend upon decisions by HCFA for Medicare, as well as
by individual health maintenance organizations, private insurers and other
payors. Potential purchasers must determine whether the clinical benefits of the
Company's TMR System justify the additional cost or effort required to obtain
prior authorization or coverage and the uncertainty of actually obtaining such
authorization or coverage. If the Company obtains the necessary foreign
regulatory registrations or approvals, market acceptance of the Company's
products in international markets would be dependent, in part, upon the
availability of reimbursement within applicable healthcare payment systems.
Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary
significantly by country, and include both government-sponsored healthcare and
private insurance. Although the Company believes that Baxter intends to seek
international reimbursement approvals, there can be no assurance that any such
approvals will be obtained in a timely manner, if at all. Failure to receive
international reimbursement approvals could have a material adverse effect on
market acceptance of the Company's products in the international markets in
which such approvals are sought. In addition, fundamental reforms in the
healthcare industry in the United States and the EU continue to be considered,
although the Company cannot predict whether or when any healthcare reform
proposals will be adopted and what impact such proposals might have. Moreover,
management is unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation, if
any, relating to the healthcare industry or third-party coverage and
reimbursement may be enacted in the future, or what effect such legislation or
regulation would have. See "Business-Government Regulation."
PRODUCT DEFECTS; LIMITS OF PRODUCT LIABILITY INSURANCE. One or more of
the Company's products may be found to be defective after the Company has
already shipped such products in volume, requiring a product replacement.
Product returns and the potential need to remedy defects or provide replacement
products or parts could impose substantial costs on the Company and have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations. The
clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing and use of the Company's devices and
procedures may expose the Company to product liability claims. The Company
maintains liability insurance with coverage limits of $3,000,000 per occurrence.
Although the Company has never been subject to a product liability claim, there
can be no assurance that the coverage limits of the Company's insurance policies
will be adequate or that one or more successful claims brought against the
Company would not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. See "Business - Product Liability
Insurance."
28
<PAGE>
RELIANCE ON PATENT PROTECTION AND PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY. The Company's
business could be adversely affected if it is unable to protect its intellectual
property, including patented and other proprietary technology, certain of which
is licensed by the Company and certain of which is owned by the Company. If the
Company or the owners of the proprietary technology are unsuccessful in
protecting their rights thereto or such technology may infringe on proprietary
rights of third parties, that portion of the Company's business could suffer. To
the extent that the Company relies upon unpatented trade secrets and know-how,
there can be no assurances that such proprietary technology will remain a trade
secret or that others will not develop substantially equivalent or superior
technologies to compete with the Company's products. In addition, there can be
no assurance given that others will not independently develop similar or
superior technologies, enabling them to provide superior products or services to
those of the Company. There can be no assurances that patentable improvements on
such technology will be developed or that existing or improved technology will
have competitive advantages or not be challenged by third parties. The laser
industry has been marked by costly and time-consuming litigation with respect to
intellectual property rights between competitors. There can be no assurances
that third parties will not claim that some or all of the Company's proprietary
technology infringes on proprietary rights of others. Such litigation may be
used to seek damages or to enjoin alleged infringement of proprietary rights of
others. Further, the defense of any such litigation, whether or not meritorious,
may divert financial and other resources of the Company from the Company's
business plan and, therefore, may have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of the Company. An adverse decision to the Company in any
such litigation may result in a significant damage awards payable by the Company
or enjoin the Company from marketing its then existing products, which would
have an adverse effect on the Company's ability to continue in business. In the
event of an adverse result in such litigation, the Company would be required to
expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or to obtain
licenses to the disputed technology from third parties. There can be no
assurances that the Company will have the resources to develop or license such
technology, or if so, that the Company would be successful in such development
or that any such licenses would be available on commercially reasonable terms.
Further, the Company may be required to commence litigation against third
parties to protect any proprietary technology rights of the Company. There can
be no assurances that the Company will be able to afford to prosecute such
litigation, or if so, that such litigation will be successful. See
"Business-Intellectual Property."
DISCLOSURE RELATING TO LOW-PRICED STOCKS. The Company's Common Stock is
currently listed for trading in the over-the-counter market (the
"Over-The-Counter Market") in the so-called "pink sheets" or the "Electronic
Bulletin Board" of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. The
Company's securities are subject to the "penny stock rules" adopted pursuant to
Section 15 (g) of the Exchange Act of 1934. The penny stock rules apply to
non-NASDAQ companies whose common stock trades at less than $5.00 per share or
which have tangible net worth of less than $5,000,000 ($2,000,000 if the company
has been operating for three or more years). Such rules require, among other
things, that brokers who trade "penny stock" to persons other than "established
customers" complete certain documentation, make suitability inquiries of
investors and provide investors with certain information concerning trading in
the security, including a risk disclosure document and quote information under
certain circumstances. Many brokers have decided not to trade "penny stock"
because of the requirements of the penny stock rules and, as a result, the
number of broker-dealers willing to act as market makers in such securities is
limited. Because the Company's securities are subject to the "penny stock
rules," investors will find it more difficult to dispose of the securities of
the Company. Further, for companies whose securities are traded on the
Over-The-Counter Market, it is more difficult: (i) to obtain accurate
quotations; (ii) to obtain coverage for significant news events because major
wire services, such as the Dow Jones News Service, generally do not publish
press releases about such companies; and (iii) to obtain needed capital. See
"Item 5 - Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters"
and "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
EFFECTS OF CERTAIN REGISTRATION RIGHTS. The Company is registering
7,092,500 shares of Common Stock, including 2,170,000 shares underlying various
Warrants and 228,000 shares underlying certain Options, in connection with a
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the "Registration Statement"). The Company
currently has 9,895,684 shares issued and outstanding. There can be no
assurances that the registration of the shares that are the subject of the
Registration Statement will not have a material adverse effect on the market
price for the Company's Common Stock resulting from the increased number of free
trading shares of Common Stock in the market. See "Item 13 - Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."
LACK OF DIVIDENDS ON COMMON STOCK. The Company has paid no dividends on
its Common Stock to date and there are no plans for paying dividends in the
foreseeable future. The Company intends to retain earnings, if any, to provide
funds for the expansion of the Company's business. See "Item 5 - Market for
Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters."
POTENTIAL ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECT OF DELAWARE LAW. The Company is subject
to certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law which, in general,
restrict the ability of a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in
29
<PAGE>
certain "business combinations," with certain exceptions, with "interested
stockholders" for a period of three (3) years after the date of transaction in
which the person became an "interested stockholder." The effect of such
"anti-takeover" provisions may delay, deter or prevent a takeover of the Company
which the stockholders may consider to be in their best interests, thereby
possibly depriving holders of the Company's securities of certain opportunities
to sell or otherwise dispose of their securities at above-market prices, or
limit the ability of stockholders to remove incumbent directors as readily as
the stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. See "Item 5 -
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters - Certain
Business Combinations and Other Provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation."
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE; ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES. Future
sales of shares of Common Stock by the Company and its stockholders could
adversely affect the prevailing market price of the Common Stock and could have
a material adverse effect on the ability of the Company to raise new capital.
There are currently 2,844,445 restricted shares and 7,051,239 shares of Common
Stock which are freely tradable, eligible to have the restrictive legend removed
pursuant to Rule 144(k) promulgated under the Securities Act or are the subject
of this Report or other registration statements. Further, the Company has
granted options to purchase up to an additional 1,694,263 shares of Common
Stock, of which 1,599,263 are currently exercisable, and Warrants to purchase up
to 2,170,000 shares of Common Stock which are the subject of registration
statements. Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock in the public market,
or the perception that such sales may occur, could have a material adverse
effect on the market price of the Common Stock. Pursuant to its Certificate of
Incorporation, the Company has the authority to issue additional shares of
Common Stock. The issuance of such shares could result in the dilution of the
voting power of Common Stock purchased in the Offering. See "Item 12 - Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Item 13 - Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."
EFFECT OF OUTSTANDING WARRANTS AND OPTIONS. The holders of the Warrants
and certain options are given an opportunity to profit from a rise in the market
price of the Common Stock, with a resulting dilution in the interest of the
other stockholders. The terms on which the Company might obtain additional
financing during the period may be adversely affected by the existence of the
Warrants and options. The holders of the Warrants may exercise the Warrants and
options at a time when the Company might be able to obtain additional capital
through a new offering of securities on terms more favorable than those provided
herein.
LIMITATIONS ON DIRECTOR LIABILITY. The Company's Certificate of
Incorporation provides, as permitted by governing Delaware law, that a director
of the Company shall not be personally liable to the Company or its stockholders
for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, with certain
exceptions. These provisions may discourage stockholders from bringing suit
against a director for breach of fiduciary duty and may reduce the likelihood of
derivative litigation brought by stockholders on behalf of the Company against a
director. In addition, the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
provide for mandatory indemnification of directors and officers to the fullest
extent permitted by Delaware law. See "Business" and "Item 10 - Directors and
Executive Officers of the Registrant".
CONSENT DECREE. In 1996, as a result of certain alleged securities law
violations in 1992 and early 1993 under prior management, the Company entered
into a Consent Decree with the Commission where it neither admitted nor denied
liability, but consented to the issuance of an injunction against any future
violation. The alleged events occurred prior to the Company's Bankruptcy
Reorganization and involve events, which occurred prior to the change in the
Company's management and directors. There can be no assurance that the Consent
Decree will not have an adverse effect on the Company's ability to conduct
financing in the future. See "Business-Legal Proceedings."
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company entered into a lease on August 4, 1998, with an
unaffiliated third party consisting of 11,500 square feet consisting of office
space, manufacturing and warehousing located at 2431 Impala Drive, Carlsbad,
California, 92008. The term of the lease is 57 months, commencing December 1,
1998. The lease cost is $8,050 per month. There are two five-year options to
extend the term of the lease, for a total occupancy of approximately 15 years,
if desired by the Company. The terms of this lease are guaranteed by PMG. See
"Item 13 - Certain Relationship and Related Transactions."
The Company currently occupies approximately 12,000 square feet of
office and light manufacturing space in Orlando, Florida, at a monthly rent of
$11,000 per month, on a month to month basis. The Company is at risk of being
evicted from these offices. At September 1, 1998, the Company was delinquent in
payment of approximately $650,000 of rental obligations on such lease. The
landlord in connection with delinquent rent has sued the Company and obtained a
judgment against the Company in the amount of approximately $45,560. A
30
<PAGE>
portion of this judgment has been paid and the balance of the judgment and the
accumulated delinquent rent are anticipated to be assumed by the purchaser of
the non-excimer laser assets. No assurance can be given that the asset sale will
close and that the obligation of this judgment and accumulated rent will be
assumed by or paid by the purchase of the non-excimer laser assets. See
"Business-Sale of the Company's Non-Excimer Laser Assets and Business" and
"Item 3 - Legal Proceedings-Lease Disputes."
The Company's Laser Analytics subsidiary occupies a 13,000 square foot
office and light manufacturing facility in Wilmington, Massachusetts, which
commenced in December, 1996, for a five-year period at $5,600 per month. This
lease is with an unaffiliated third party.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
BANKRUPTCY REORGANIZATION. The Company filed the Bankruptcy Proceeding
on May 13, 1994 (Case No. 94-02608-611). The Plan was confirmed on May 22, 1995.
See "Business - History of the Company."
CONSENT DECREE. In 1996, the Company entered into a Consent Decree with
the Commission where it neither admitted nor denied alleged securities law
violations in 1992 and early 1993 under prior management, but consented to the
issuance of an injunction against any future violation. The alleged events
occurred prior to the Bankruptcy Reorganization and involve events, which
occurred prior to the change in the Company's management and directors. The
current management and directors have no connection with this proceeding. No
monetary damages were sought.
LEASE DISPUTES. In 1998 Riverboat Landing, Inc., as plaintiff, in the
County Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, Seminole County, Florida
obtained a judgment in the amount of $45,560 for delinquent rent obligations for
a facility in Sanford, Florida. The Company has paid a small portion of this
judgment and agreed to a monthly payout of the balance. As of the date of this
Report, the Company owes approximately $6,000 of this obligation.
On April 21, 1998, City National Bank of Florida, Trustee ("Landlord")
filed suit against the Company for unpaid rent for the Company's facility in
Orlando. City National Bank of Florida, Trustee v. Laser Photonics, Inc.,
Circuit Court, Ninth Judicial District, Orange County, Florida, #CI198-3526.
Plaintiff subsequently obtained a final judgment which, including interest and
late fees, totaled approximately $695,000 as of the date of this Report. The
purchaser of the Company's non-excimer laser business has agreed, as part of the
purchaser price, to assume this obligation. No assurance can be given that the
asset sale will close and that the obligation for this judgment will be assumed
by or paid by the Buyer of the non-excimer laser assets. See "Business-Sale of
the Company's Non-Excimer Laser Assets and Business."
Except as set forth above, the Company knows of no material legal
actions, pending or threatened, or judgment entered against the Company or any
executive officer or director of the Company, in his capacity as such.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
During the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company's stockholders
adopted no resolutions at a meeting. On February 4, 1998 a majority of the
31
<PAGE>
shareholders adopted a resolution by majority consent to increase the authorized
number of shares of common stock from 10,000,000 to 15,000,000.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
As of the date of this Report, the Company had 9,895,684 shares of
Common Stock issued and outstanding. Further, the Company has issued and
outstanding Options to purchase 1,694,263 shares of Common Stock and Warrants to
purchase up to 2,170,000 shares of Common Stock.
The Company's Common Stock is listed for trading in the
Over-The-Counter Market under the symbol "LSPT." The Company's Common Stock,
subsequent to the confirmation of Plan on May 22, 1995, has been quoted on the
Electronic Bulletin Board since approximately January 22, 1996 under the stock
symbol "LSPT."
The following table sets forth quotations for the bid and asked prices
for the Common Stock for the periods indicated below, based upon quotations
between dealers, without adjustments for stock splits, dividends, retail
mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions, and therefore, may not represent actual
transactions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BID PRICES ASKED PRICES
---------- ------------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
---- --- ---- ---
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1st Quarter 7 3/4 4 1/2 8 1/4 5 3/4
2nd Quarter 8 1/4 3 3/4 8 1/2 4 1/4
3rd Quarter 5 3/8 3 5/8 5 5/8 5 5/8
4th Quarter 3 11/16 11/16 4 1/8 13/16
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
1st Quarter 2 9/32 5/16 2 5/16 3/8
2nd Quarter 1 5/16 5/16 1 7/16 13/32
3rd Quarter 4 3/8 7/8 4 9/16 1 1/16
4th Quarter 6 1/8 2 31/32 6 3/8 3 1/8
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
1st Quarter 4 1/8 2 1/2 4 3/8 2 11/16
2nd Quarter 3 3/4 2 1/8 3 7/8 2 3/8
3rd Quarter 2 9/16 1 1/8 2 3/4 1 1/4
4th Quarter 3 1/16 1 1/4 3 1/4 1 3/8
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1999
1st Quarter 4 1/4 2 3/8 4 1/2 2 17/32
</TABLE>
On April 14, 1999, the closing market price for the Company's Common
Stock in the Over-The-Counter Market was approximately $5.94 share. As of
April 14, 1999, the Company had approximately 1,029 stockholders of record.
32
<PAGE>
CERTAIN BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION
As a Delaware corporation, the Company is currently subject to the
anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
("Section 203"). Section 203 provides, with certain exceptions, that a Delaware
corporation may not engage in any of a broad range of business combinations with
a person or an affiliate, or associate of such person, who is an "interested
stockholder" for a period of three (3) years from the date that such person
became an interested stockholder unless: (i) the transaction resulting in a
person becoming an interested stockholder, or the business combination, is
approved by the Board of Directors of the corporation before the person becomes
an interested stockholder; (ii) the interested stockholder acquired eighty five
percent (85%) or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation in the
same transaction that makes such person an interested stockholder (excluding
shares owned by persons who are both officers and directors of the corporation,
and shares held by certain employee stock ownership plans); or (iii) on or after
the date the person becomes an interested stockholder, the business combination
is approved by the corporation's board of directors and by the holders of at
least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66-2/3%) of the corporation's
outstanding voting stock at an annual or special meeting, excluding shares owned
by the interested stockholder. Under Section 203, an "interested stockholder" is
defined as any person who is: (i) the owner of fifteen percent (15%) or more of
the outstanding voting stock of the corporations; or (ii) an affiliate or
associate of the corporation and who was the owner of fifteen percent (15%) or
more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation at any time within the
three (3) year period immediately prior to the date on which it is sought to be
determined whether such person is an interested stockholder.
A corporation may, at its option, exclude itself from the coverage of
Section 203 by amending its certificate of incorporation or bylaws by action of
its stockholders to exempt itself from coverage, provided that such bylaw or
certificate of incorporation amendment shall not become effective until twelve
(12) months after the date it is adopted. The Company has not adopted such an
amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws.
ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The Selected Consolidated Financial Data for the years ended December
31, 1994 through 1998 set forth below are derived from the Consolidated
Financial Statements of the Company and Notes thereto. The Consolidated
Financial Balance Sheets and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations,
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) and Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997, 1996 and 1994, and the periods from January 1, 1995 to May 22, 1995
and May 23, 1995 to December 31, 1995, appear elsewhere in this Report. The
Selected Consolidated Financial Data are qualified in their entirety by
reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Consolidated Financial
Statements and related
33
<PAGE>
Notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this Report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, MAY 23, TO YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER TO MAY 22, DECEMBER DECEMBER 31,
31, 1994 1995(1) 31, 1995(1) 1996 1997 1998
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
DATA: (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 5,715 $ 1,242 $ 1,408 $ 2,901 $ 3,815 $ 2,349
Costs and Expenses 6,713 2,082 3,351 7,704 5,746 7,746
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Loss from operations (998) (840) (1,942) (4,802) (1,931) (5,397)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Other income (expenses) (1,236) (89) (181) (556) (372) (508)
Income tax expense -- -- -- -- (4) (3)
Extraordinary item-gain
>From reorganization -- 5,768 -- -- -- --
Net income (loss) $ (2,234) $ 4,839(2) $ (2,124) $ (5,358) $ (2,307) $ (5,908)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============ =============
Basic and diluted income
(loss) per share (0.35) (0.75) (0.42) (0.95) (0.35) (0.64)
Weighted average shares(3) 6,312 6,312 5,000 5,620 6,531 9,288
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):
Working capital (deficit) 960 (99) (610) (1,728) 15 (1,843)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
Total Assets 2,144 1,715 5,796 3,195 7,808 4,870
Long-term debt (net of current -- -- 867 283 283 70
portion)
Liabilities subject to compromise 7,930 7,564 -- -- -- --
Total stockholders' equity (6,643) (7,404) 686 (2,090) 4,929 1,841
(deficit)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------
</TABLE>
(FOOTNOTES ARE ON FOLLOWING PAGE)
34
<PAGE>
(FOOTNOTES FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
(1) In connection with the confirmation of the Bankruptcy Reorganization on
May 22, 1995, the Company was required to adopt fresh start reporting as
of May 23, 1995 since the reorganization value (approximate fair value at
the date of reorganization) was less than the total of all post-petition
liabilities and allowed claims, and holders of existing voting shares from
January 1, 1995, through May 23, 1995 received less than 50% of the voting
shares of the emerging entity. Accordingly, the statement of operations
for the period ended May 22, 1995 reflects the effects of the forgiveness
of debt resulting from the confirmation of the Bankruptcy Reorganization
and the effects of the adjustments to restate assets and liabilities to
reflect the reorganization value. In addition, the Company's accumulated
deficit of the Company was eliminated and the Company's capital structure
was recast in conformity with the Bankruptcy Reorganization. As such, the
consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 1995,
1996, 1997 and 1998 and for the period from May 23, 1995 to December 31,
1995, and the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, reflect that
of the Company on and after May 23, 1995, which, in effect, is a new
entity for financial reporting purposes with assets, liabilities, and a
capital structure having carrying values not comparable with prior
periods. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1993 and 1994
and as of May 22, 1995, and for the period from January 1, 1995 to May 22,
1995 and the year ended December 31, 1994 reflect that of the Company
prior to May 23, 1995. See "Business - Business of the Company" and "Item
3 - Legal Proceedings."
(2) Includes an extraordinary gain of $5,768,405. See "Item 7 - Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
(3) Common Stock equivalents and convertible issues are antidilutive and,
therefore, are not included in the weighted shares outstanding during the
years the Company incurred net losses.
35
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
THIS REPORT, INCLUDING THE DISCLOSURES BELOW, CONTAINS CERTAIN
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES.
WHEN USED HEREIN, THE TERMS "ANTICIPATES," "EXPECTS," "ESTIMATES," "BELIEVES"
AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS, AS THEY RELATE TO THE COMPANY OR ITS MANAGEMENT, ARE
INTENDED TO IDENTIFY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL
RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED
OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR
CONTRIBUTE TO SUCH MATERIAL DIFFERENCES INCLUDE THE FACTORS DISCLOSED IN THE
"RISK FACTORS" SECTION OF THIS REPORT, WHICH READERS OF THIS REPORT SHOULD
CONSIDER CAREFULLY.
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES INCLUDED ELSEWHERE
IN THIS REPORT.
OVERVIEW OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS
The Company is engaged in the development of proprietary excimer laser
and fiber optic equipment and techniques directed toward the treatment of
cardiovascular and vascular disease and the treatment of psoriasis. The Company
anticipates developing such equipment and technologies to treat other medical
problems as well as non-medical applications. However, no assurance to this
effect can be given.
On May 13, 1994, the Company filed for Bankruptcy Reorganization. The
Company was subsequently authorized to conduct its business operations as a
debtor-in-possession subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. On May
22, 1995, the Company's Plan was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. The
implementation of the terms of the Plan resulted in the Company's adoption of
"fresh start" accounting. The Plan provided, that in exchange for the
forgiveness of certain unsecured debt, the Company issued to unsecured creditors
shares of the Company's Common Stock such that, following the issuance of all
Common Stock to be issued under the Plan, the unsecured creditors owned
1,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, representing 20% of the issued
and outstanding Common Stock of the Company. The shares of Common Stock of the
Company's prior existing stockholders were cancelled and reissued into 250,000
shares of Common Stock, which represented 5% of the then total issued and
outstanding shares of Common Stock.
The Plan further provided that Helionetics transfer to the Company
76.1% of the common stock of Acculase. Further, during the pendency of the
Bankruptcy Proceeding, Helionetics contributed $1,000,000 in cash to the
Company, which funds were utilized for cash payments under the Plan, Helionetics
loaned to the Company $300,000 to fund the cost of research and development of
the Company's excimer lasers, which has been repaid. Under the Plan, Helionetics
received 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, which represented 75%
of the then total issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.
During April, 1997, Helionetics filed a voluntary petition of
reorganization ("Helionetics Reorganization") with the United States Bankruptcy
Court in the Central District of California for protection under Chapter 11 of
Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As a result, the Company wrote
off its $662,775 receivable from Helionetics as of December 31, 1996. On
September 30, 1997, Pennsylvania Merchant Group ("PMG"), the Company's
investment banker, purchased from the Helionetics bankruptcy estate, a note
payable from Acculase to Helionetics in the amount of $2,159,708, including
accrued interest. During October, 1997, PMG sold the note to the Company for
800,000 shares of Common Stock.
Acculase was founded in 1985 for the purpose of commercializing
products that utilize its proprietary excimer laser and fiberoptic technologies.
Acculase has focused primarily on the development of medical products for the
treatment of coronary heart disease.
The Company believes that excimer laser technology provides the basis
for reliable cost-effective systems that will increasingly be used in connection
with a variety of applications. The Company is engaged in the development of
proprietary excimer laser and fiberoptic equipment and techniques directed
initially toward the treatment of coronary heart disease and psoriasis, as well
as other medical and non-medical applications.
36
<PAGE>
In 1997, the Company entered into certain agreements with Baxter and
MGH with respect to the manufacturing and marketing of its excimer lasers and
delivery systems. There can be no assurances that the Company will ever develop
significant revenues or profitable operations from such agreements.
The Company's initial medical applications for its excimer laser
technology are intended to be used in the treatment of: (i) cardiovascular
disease; and (ii) psoriasis. The Company's cardiovascular and vascular
applications are in connection with an experimental procedure known as TMR, in
which the Company's TMR System is currently in Phase I Human Clinical trials.
The Company and Baxter are engaged in a strategic alliance in the development
and marketing of excimer laser products for TMR. The Company began testing its
excimer laser system for psoriasis at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1998
with a Dose Response Study under IRB approval. The final data from the study was
collected in December, 1998. The Company believes that this data will serve as
the basis for a 510(k) submission to the FDA in the third quarter of 1999.
In addition to the agreement with Baxter, the Company has entered into
an agreement with MGH, pursuant to which the Company obtained an exclusive,
worldwide, royalty-bearing license from MGH to commercially develop,
manufacture, use and sell products, utilizing certain technology of MGH, related
to the diagnosis and treatment of certain dermatological conditions and
diseases, particularly psoriasis. On March 17, 1998, the Company entered into
the Clinical Trial Agreement with MGH to evaluate the use of excimer laser light
to treat psoriasis.
BASIS FOR PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
The consolidated financial statements filed elsewhere herein have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets
and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business, and, where
applicable, in conformity with Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting
by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code," issued in November,
1990, by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("SOP 90-7").
Under the provisions of SOP 90-7 and in connection with the
confirmation of the Bankruptcy Reorganization on May 22, 1995, the Company was
required to adopt fresh start reporting as of May 23, 1995, since the
reorganization value (approximate fair value at the date of reorganization) was
less than the total of all post-petition liabilities and allowed claims, and
holders of existing voting shares before May 23, 1995 received less than 50% of
the voting shares of the emerging entity. Accordingly, the consolidated
statements of operations for the period from January 1, 1995 to May 22, 1995
reflects the effects of the forgiveness of debt resulting from the confirmation
of the Bankruptcy Reorganization and the adjustments to restate assets and
liabilities to reflect the reorganization value.
In adopting fresh start reporting, the Company was required to
determine its reorganization value, which represented the fair value of the
Company before considering liabilities and the approximate amount a willing
buyer would pay for the assets of the Company immediately after the Bankruptcy
Reorganization. The reorganization value was based upon the consideration given
by Helionetics to acquire a 75% interest in the Company. The purchase price of
$1,894,122 was determined based upon cash paid and the carrying value of the
76.1% interest in Acculase previously owned by Helionetics, which was
transferred to the Company in connection with the Bankruptcy Reorganization.
All assets and liabilities were restated to reflect their
reorganization value in accordance with procedures specified in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion 16 "Business Combinations," as required by SOP 90-7.
The portion of the reorganization value that could not be attributed to specific
tangible or identified intangible assets was classified as reorganization value
in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets ("Reorganization
Goodwill") and was being amortized over five years. Because of the magnitude of
the Company's losses since emerging from the Bankruptcy Reorganization, the
balance of the Reorganization Goodwill was written off as of December 31, 1996.
37
<PAGE>
In addition, the accumulated deficit of the Company was eliminated, and
its capital structure was recast in conformity with the Bankruptcy
Reorganization. As such, the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 1996, 1997, 1998, and the consolidated statements of operations for
the years ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, reflect in effect, a new
entity for financial reporting purposes, as of May 23, 1995, with assets,
liabilities, and a capital structure having carrying values not comparable with
periods prior to May 23, 1995.
The Company's consolidated income statements for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, which form a part of the Company's
consolidated financial statements for such years, reflect the consolidated
results of operations of Laser Photonics, Laser Analytics and Acculase.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents selected consolidated financial
information stated as a percentage of revenues for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1997 and 1998:
Year ended December 31,
1996 1997 1998
------ ------ ------
Revenues 100% 100% 100%
Costs of sales 80 55 77
------ ------ ------
Gross profit 6 20 23
------ ------ ------
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 40 57 154
Research and development 30 18 53
Bad debt expense related to
related party receivable 23 1 --
Write-off reorganization
goodwill 51 -- --
Depreciation and amortization 42 19 46
------ ------ ------
Loss from operations (166) (50) (230)
Other expense (19) (10) (21)
------ ------ ------
Loss before income tax (185) (60) (251)
Income tax expense -- -- --
------ ------ ------
Net loss (185)% (60)% (251)%
====== ====== ======
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
DECEMBER 31, 1997. Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 1998 decreased
approximately 38% to $2,349,448 from $3,815,330 for the year ended December 31,
1997. Total revenues for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 primarily
consisted of: (i) sales of $1,580,422 and $2,960,330, in the respective years,
of the Company scientific and medical lasers from the operations of the
Company's Florida and Massachusetts facilities, and (ii) revenues of $769,026
and $855,000, in the respective years, relating to the sale of the Company's
excimer lasers to Baxter and the recognition of certain payments made by Baxter
to commercialize the Company's excimer lasers in connection with the Baxter
Agreement. Revenues on sales of medical and scientific lasers decreased in 1998
due to reduced volume of sales and discounting on sales of medical and
scientific lasers in connection with the Company's focusing its marketing
efforts on its excimer laser systems.
Total costs and expenses during the year ended December 31, 1998,
increased approximately 35% to $7,746,686 from $5,746,170 during the year ended
December 31, 1997. Total costs and expenses include: (i) cost of sales, (ii)
selling, general and administrative expenses, (iii) research and development,
(iv) depreciation and amortization, and (v) certain bad debt expenses, as
follows:
38
<PAGE>
Cost of sales during the year ended December 31, 1998, decreased
approximately 14% to $1,806,557 from $2,090,276 during the year ended December
31, 1997. This decrease primarily resulted from reduced sales and higher costs
in connection with the development of the Company's excimer laser system.
As a result, cost of sales as a percentage of sales increased to
approximately 77% in 1998 from 55% in 1997.
Selling, general and administrative expenses during the year ended
December 31, 1998 increased approximately 65% to $3,608,108 from $2,181,304
during the year ended December 31, 1997. This increase primarily resulted from:
(i) compensation recognized in 1998 of $1,318,200 related to the issuance of
warrants to PMG for financial advisory services, and (ii) consulting fees of
$231,000 to CSC related to the marketing of the Company's excimer lasers.
Research and development during the year ended December 31, 1998
increased to $1,243,372 from $685,109 during the year ended December 31, 1997.
This increase primarily related to the availability of funds in 1998 from
financings conducted in the fourth quarter of 1997 and in 1998 as sources of
funding for research and development activities. Research and development
expenses in 1998 primarily related to the development of the Company's psoriasis
laser system and to additional testing related to meet CE Mark and UL standards
for the Company's excimer lasers.
Bad debt expense related to related party receivables during the year
ended December 31, 1998 was none, as compared to $48,000 during the year ended
December 31, 1997. The Company had incurred a non-recurring bad debt expense of
$48,000 in 1997 related to the write-off of a receivable from Helionetics.
Depreciation and amortization during the year ended December 31, 1998
increased to $1,088,649 from $741,481 during the year ended December 31, 1997.
This increase related to the amortization of the prepaid license fee from Baxter
and the depreciation of newly acquired equipment in 1998.
Other expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 1998 to
$508,049 from $372,361 during the year ended December 31, 1997. This increase in
other expenses between the respective years resulted primarily from increased
interest expense of $510,948 in 1998 from $386,069 in 1997.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company experienced a net loss of
$5,908,587 during the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared to a net loss of
$2,307,101 during the year ended December 31, 1997. The Company also experienced
a net loss from operations of $5,397,238 during the year ended December 31,
1998, as compared to a net loss from operations of $1,930,840 during the year
ended December 31, 1997. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources."
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
DECEMBER 31, 1996. Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 1997 increased
approximately 32% to $3,815,330 from $2,901,454 for the year ended December 31,
1996. Total revenues for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996 primarily
consisted of sales of $2,960,330 and $2,901,454, in the respective years, of the
Company scientific and medical lasers from the operations of the Company's
Florida and Massachusetts facilities. However, the Company generated revenues in
1997 of $855,000 relating to the sale of its excimer lasers to Baxter and the
recognition of certain payments made by Baxter to commercialize the Company's
excimer lasers in connection with the Baxter Agreement, which did not occur in
1996, and which primarily resulted in the increased revenues for 1997 as
compared to 1996.
Total costs and expenses during the year ended December 31, 1997
decreased 25% to $5,746,170 from $7,703,607 during the year ended December 31,
1996. Total costs and expenses include: (i) cost of sales, (ii) selling, general
and administrative expenses, (iii) research and development, (iv) depreciation
and amortization, and (v) certain bad debt expenses, as follows:
Cost of sales during the year ended December 31, 1997 decreased
approximately 10% to $2,090,276 from $2,329,299 during the year ended December
31, 1996. This decrease primarily resulted from increased efficiency in the
Company's focus on the marketing of laser products with lower margins and the
purchasing of materials at volume discounts due to improved relations with
vendors as part of the restructuring of cost controls instituted by new
management following the Bankruptcy Reorganization.
39
<PAGE>
As a result, cost of sales as a percentage of sales decreased to
approximately 55% in 1997 from 80% in 1996.
Selling, general and administrative expenses during the year ended
December 31, 1997 increased approximately 88% to $2,181,304 from $1,158,841
during the year ended December 31, 1996. This increase primarily resulted from:
(i) compensation of $671,323 recognized upon issuance of stock options and
$95,625 of Common Stock issued as payment for professional services in 1997, as
compared to $326,250 of Common Stock issued as payment of a litigation
settlement (and recorded as rental expense) and employee compensation in 1996,
(ii) payment of $71,000 in federal tax penalties in 1997 which did not occur in
1996, and (iii) the increased focus of the Company's excimer laser business
operations to marketing in 1997 from research and development in 1996 in
connection with the execution of the Baxter Agreement in August, 1997. The
Company believes that the issuance of securities as related to compensation and
rental expenses and the cash payment of tax penalties will be nonrecurring
expenses in the future.
Research and development during the year ended December 31, 1997
decreased to $685,109 from $850,993 during the year ended December 31, 1996.
This decrease primarily related to the Company's increased focus of the
Company's excimer laser business operations to marketing in 1997 from research
and development in 1996 in connection with the execution of the Baxter Agreement
in August, 1997.
Bad debt expense related to related party receivables during the year
ended December 31, 1997 decreased to $48,000 from $662,775 during the year ended
December 31, 1996. The Company incurred a bad debt expense of $662,775 in 1996
related to the write-off of a receivable from Helionetics and of $48,000 in 1997
related to the write-off of a receivable from a subsidiary of Helionetics. These
items will be nonrecurring expenses in the future.
The Company incurred an expense of the write-off of Reorganization
Goodwill initially recognized in connection with the Bankruptcy Reorganization
of $1,486,823 during the year ended December 31, 1996, which did not occur
during the year ended December 31, 1997. The Reorganization Goodwill recognized
in connection with the Bankruptcy Reorganization represented the portion of the
reorganization value that could not be attributed to specific tangible or
identified assets, which were being amortized over five (5) years. The
Reorganization Goodwill was written-off as of December 31, 1996 because of the
magnitude of the Company's losses following the Bankruptcy Reorganization.
Depreciation and amortization during the year ended December 31, 1997
decreased to $741,481 from $1,214,876 during the year ended December 31, 1996.
This decrease related to the reduction of $1,486,823 of Reorganization Goodwill
on the Company balance sheet as of December 31, 1996.
Other expenses decreased during the year ended December 31, 1997 to
$372,361 from $555,815 during the year ended December 31, 1996. This decrease in
other expenses between the respective years resulted primarily from increased
interest income of $52,280 in 1997 from none in 1996.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company experienced a net loss of
$2,307,101 during the year ended December 31, 1997, as compared to a net loss of
$5,357,968 during the year ended December 31, 1996. The Company also experienced
a net loss from operations of $1,930,840 during the year ended December 31,
1997, as compared to a net loss from operations of $4,802,153 during the year
ended December 31, 1996. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources."
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES. At December 31, 1998, the ratio of
current assets to current liabilities was 0.28 to 1.00 compared to 1.01 to 1.00
at December 31, 1997.
The Company has historically financed its operations through the use of
working capital provided from operations, loans and equity and debt financing to
the Company. The Company's cash flow needs for the years ended December 31, 1998
and 1997 were primarily provided from operations, loans and equity financing.
40
<PAGE>
The Company experienced severe cash flow problems during the first six
(6) months of 1997 and throughout 1996 and 1995. These cash flow problems
limited the Company's ability to purchase materials and parts incorporated in
the Company's laser products, and further restricted the Company's ability to
purchase such materials at volume discounts, thereby reducing revenues from
potential sales and gross profits from concluded sales. New management
instituted policies of cost controls, improved product selection, staff
reduction, budgeting and corporate planning in 1997, which have increased the
Company's business efficiencies, including decreases in cost of sales as a
percentage of sales, reduction in net losses and losses from operations and the
focusing on a business plan aimed at excimer laser products which management
believes has greater potential of success than the Company's laser products
preceding the Bankruptcy Reorganization.
Due to the limited financial resources of the Company, the Company's
strategy changed in 1997 to focus its efforts on the Company's excimer laser
technology and expertise in order to develop a broad base of excimer laser and
excimer laser delivery products for both medical and non-medical applications.
To facilitate the Company's new focus on excimer laser technology, in October,
1997, the Company is in the process of selling all of the Company's non-excimer
laser business. As of January 4, 1999, the Company entered into the Asset
Purchase Agreement, which is scheduled to close in April, 1999. The Asset
Purchase Agreement provides that the Buyer will pay and/or assume an aggregate
of $1,200,000 of the accrued and unpaid accounts payable and/or other debts of
the Company. These debts include, but are not limited to, the debt owed to the
Company's landlord in Orlando, Florida. The Company intends to transfer to the
Buyer certain assets of Laser Photonics and Laser Analytics which are related to
the Company's non-excimer laser business.
Completion of this transaction will result in the sale of all of the
Company's non-excimer laser business assets. Management's decision to sell the
assets of the Company business operations not related to the Company's excimer
laser technology will result in the divestiture of the Company's business
operations which have generated substantially all of the Company's revenues
before December 31, 1998. Total assets and total liabilities at December 31,
1998 related to the Company's non-excimer laser business operations, which are
the subject of the Asset Purchase Agreement, were $806,335 and $1,200,000,
respectively. Revenues from such operation for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 were $1,580,000, $2,960,000 and $2,901,000, respectively.
Loss from the related operations during these periods was $996,000, $647,000 and
$926,000, respectively. As of the date of this Report, the Company has received
$30,000 as a good faith deposit against the purchase price. No assurance can be
given that the Buyer will complete the purchase under the Asset Purchase
Agreement, or if not, that the Company will be able to find an alternative on as
favorable terms as set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement.
Although the Company has developed strategic alliances with Baxter
related to the Company's excimer lasers, there can be no assurances that the
Company will ever develop significant revenues or profitable operations with
respect to this new business plan.
In September and October, 1997, the Company privately sold a total of
679,500 restricted shares of its Common Stock in a private placement at a price
of $1.25 per share through PMG. The price of the Common Stock on the date of
this transaction was $2.50 per share. These funds were used in part to pay
outstanding accounts payable and delinquent federal and state taxes outstanding.
The Company sold an additional 28,601 shares at a price of $1.25 per share in
the third quarter of 1997, but did not receive payment for the shares until the
first quarter of 1998. The price of the Common Stock on the date of this
transaction was $2.56 per share.
During September, 1997, the Company purchased from PMG a note payable
in the amount of $2,159,708 of its partially owned Acculase subsidiary, for
800,000 shares of Common Stock, or approximately $2.70 per share. During the
quarter ended September 30, 1997, the mean between the average of the high and
low bid and asked prices for the Common Stock was approximately $2.71 per share.
The effect on the Company's financial statements was to reduce long-term debt
with a corresponding increase in stockholders' equity in the amount of the note.
In November, 1997, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock,
and 750,000 warrants in connection with a private financing of $6,000,000 to the
Company through PMG. The price of the Common Stock at November 30, 1997 was
approximately $5.06 per share. The Company also issued 150,000 warrants and paid
a commission of $480,000 to PMG as a placement agent fee. The warrants issued in
connection with the private financing are to purchase up to 900,000 shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share, which expire on November
26, 2002. The 900,000 shares underlying the warrants are being registered in
41
<PAGE>
connection with a registration statement on Form S-1. The Company used
$4,000,000 of these proceeds to acquire a license from Baxter related to the
Company's excimer lasers in connection with the Baxter Agreement. The Company
used the remaining $2,000,000 raised in the private financing as follows:
$530,000 to pay commissions and fees to PMG, $60,000 to pay fees and expenses to
professional in connection with the private financing, $48,000 to pay certain
tax liabilities of the Company and $1,362,000 for working capital.
On December 15, 1997, the Company issued warrants to PMG to purchase up
to 300,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, which
expire on December 15, 2002. The warrants were issued to PMG as compensation for
past and future investment banking and advisory services. The 300,000 shares
underlying the Warrants are being registered on Form S-1.
The Company has agreed to issue to PMG an additional 75,000 warrants
(the "Contingent Warrants") at a purchase price of $0.001 per share at such time
as any of the 750,000 warrants related to the $6,000,000 private placement have
been exercised. The Contingent Warrants will be exercisable for a period of five
years following the date of issue at an exercise price equal to the average
closing bid price for the Common Stock for the ten trading days preceding the
date of issue. The warrants may be redeemed by the Company, upon 30 days'
notice, at a redemption price of $0.10 per share, if the closing bid price of
the Common Stock exceeds $8.00 per share for a period of thirty consecutive
trading days.
In July, 1998, the Company granted warrants to acquire 300,000 shares
of Common Stock to PMG at an exercise price of $2.00 per share in consideration
for the guarantee, by PMG, of a lease of office space in Carlsbad, California by
the Company and the raising of a bridge loan of $1,000,000. Such warrants are
exercisable at anytime until July 15, 2003. The shares underlying these warrants
are being registered on Form S-1. See "Item 13-Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions - Convertible Debt and Conversion of Convertible Debt."
During July and August, 1998, PMG, the Company's investment banker,
arranged to have Acculase, the Company's 76.1% owned subsidiary, issue
$1,000,000 of 10% Convertible Promissory Notes (the "Convertible Notes") to
various investors. The Convertible Notes were guaranteed by the Company.
Interest is payable annually and may be paid in cash or in the Company's Common
Stock at the Company's option. The principal amount of Convertible Notes
automatically converted into 500,000 shares of Common Stock on December 31,
1998. Additional shares will be issued subsequently in exchange for accrued, but
unpaid interest on the notes. At December 31, 1998, the amount of accrued and
unpaid interest on the Convertible Notes was $41,735. As of the date of this
Report, the exact amount of additional shares to be issued is unknown, but the
Company estimates that the number will not exceed 25,000 shares. The shares of
Common Stock issued in conversion of the Convertible Notes are being registered
pursuant to a registration statement.
As of March 31, 1999, PMG arranged for the Company to issue to various
investors $2,380,000 of units of its securities (the "Units"), each Unit
consisting of: (i) $10,000 principal amount of 7% Series A Convertible
Subordinated Notes (the "Subordinated Notes"); and (ii) common stock purchase
warrants to purchase up to 2,500 shares of Common Stock (the "Unit Warrants").
The entire principal is due and payable in one payment on the earlier of: (i)
December 15, 1999; or (ii) the date that is three business days after the
Company consummates its next equity financing (the "Subsequent Financing") in
which the Company receives net proceeds of at least $2,380,000 (the "Due Date").
Interest accruing on the Subordinated Notes through June 15, 1999 is payable on
June 15, 1999. Interest accrued as of the earlier of the Due Date or December
15, 1999, is payable on the earlier of the Due Date or December 15, 1999.
Payment of principal and interest on the Subordinated Notes is subordinate and
junior in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all senior debt of
the Company. The Subordinated Note holders may convert the Subordinated Notes
and accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, into shares of Common Stock at
any time prior to maturity or receipt of prepayment into shares of Common Stock
at a conversion price of $2.00 per share. The Subordinated Notes provide that
the conversion price is to be adjusted in the event that the Company issues
shares of Common Stock for consideration of less than $2.00 per share. In such
event, the per share conversion price will be adjusted to the issue price of
such additionally issued shares of Common Stock.
The Unit Warrants are exercisable into an initial 1,250 shares of
Common Stock at any time after purchase until March 31, 2004. The balance of the
Unit Warrants are exercisable into an additional 1,250 shares of Common Stock
(the "Contingent Shares") if the Unit holder has voluntarily converted at least
a portion of the principal amount of the Subordinated Note that make up a
42
<PAGE>
portion of the Unit into shares of Common Stock. The amount of Contingent Shares
that may be acquired by a Unit Warrant holder will be proportionate to the ratio
of the amount of principal of the Subordinated Notes which are converted into
shares of Common Stock over the original principal amount of the Subordinated
Notes. The exercise price of the Unit Warrants will be the lower of (i) $2.00
per share of Common Stock; and (ii) the price per share of Common Stock in the
Subsequent Financing. The Unit Warrants provide that they may be adjusted in the
event that the Company issues shares of Common Stock for consideration of less
than $2.00 per share. In such event, the per share exercise price of the Unit
Warrants will be adjusted to the issue price of such additionally issued shares
of Common Stock. As of the date of this Report, no adjustments have been made.
All of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Subordinated Notes and the Unit
Warrants are being registered on Form S-1.
Cash and cash equivalents were $174,468 as of December 31, 1998, as
compared to $1,225,932 as of December 31, 1997. This decrease was primarily
attributable to the utilization of cash raised in connection with the series of
equity financings arranged by PMG and cash generated from the Baxter Agreement
to fund marketing activities, increased research and development activities, to
make investments in inventory to support anticipated sales of excimer lasers to
Baxter and to pay off certain liabilities.
As of December 31, 1998, the Company had long-term borrowing in the
aggregate amount of $69,893, less the current portion. As of December 31, 1997,
the Company had long-term borrowings of $282,559, less the current portion. The
decrease in long-term borrowings relates to payments of certain scheduled
obligations, including: (a) obligations payable in the total amount of $282,559,
pursuant to the Plan, to former members of the Board of Directors of the
Company. Interest accrues at the prime rate and is payable quarterly until
October 1, 1999. The principal amounts of these obligations are due October 1,
1999. The notes related to those obligations went into default in the first
quarter of 1999 and are the subject of a suit filed by certain former directors
of the Company. The Company paid these notes from the proceeds of the $2,380,000
Subordinated Note Offering received by the Company in April, 1999; (b)
promissory notes payable in the total amount of $168,158, pursuant to the Plan,
to the former unsecured creditors of the Company. Interest accrues at the prime
rate and is payable quarterly until October 1, 1999; (c) secured promissory
notes payable in the total amount of $127,860 pursuant to the Plan, to Novatis
Corp., formerly known as CIBA-GEIGY. Interest accrues at the rate of 10% per
annum and is payable quarterly through May 5, 1997, and, thereafter, with
monthly principal and interest payments of $6,384 through May, 1999. This
promissory note is secured by the assets of Laser Analytics; (d) a promissory
note payable to the U.S. Treasury for delinquent taxes in the amount of
$109,574. This note bears interest at the rate of 9% per annum, payable in
monthly principal and interest installments of $5,000 through December, 1999.
This promissory note is secured by all assets of the Company; (e) unsecured
promissory notes payable to various creditors in the amount of $70,750. These
notes are payable with interest at 9% per annum, in various monthly principal
and interest installments through July, 2000; and (f) a secured promissory note
in the amount of $37,624, payable to Laser Center of America, with interest at
the rate of 9% per annum, in monthly installments of principal and interest of
$1,258, through January, 2001. This promissory note is collateralized by certain
personal property of the Company. The payments on this promissory note are past
due. See Item 13 "Certain Relationships and Related Transaction-Conversion of
Convertible Debt."
Net cash used in operating activities was $2,083,230, $993,851 and
$1,010,589 for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
Net cash used in operating activities during the years ended December 31, 1998,
1997 and 1996 primarily consisted of net losses (after giving effect to the debt
forgiveness in connection with the Bankruptcy Reorganization), increases in net
current liabilities (1997 only) and decreases in net current assets (1997 and
1996 only), offset by depreciation and amortization, the payment in the
Company's securities of compensation and fees for services, bad debt expenses
with respect to a related party receivable (1997 and 1996 only), decreases in
net current liabilities (1998 and 1996 only) and increases in net current assets
(1998 only).
Net cash used in investing activities was $145,758, $4,093,293 and
$308,924 for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. In
the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company utilized $116,158 to purchase
equipment and for the construction of a laser to be used as a demonstration
model. In the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company utilized $4,001,926 to
make payments to Baxter under the Baxter Agreement, $37,541 to purchase certain
equipment and $73,000 as an advance payment to a related party, which was offset
by the receipt of $19,174 from the sale of certain equipment. In the year ended
December 31, 1996, the Company utilized $292,900 as an advance payment to
Helionetics and $16,024 to purchase certain equipment. These advances to
Helionetics were accomplished at a time when the Company was under different
management and was a majority-owned subsidiary of the related party.
43
<PAGE>
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,177,524, $6,313,076,
and $1,258,427 during the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. In the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company utilized $135,187
to reduce certain debt obligations, which was offset by the receipt of $35,751
of proceeds from the sale of Common Stock and $1,276,960 from the proceeds of
the issuance of the Convertible Notes. In the year ended December 31, 1997, the
Company received $6,259,077 from the sale of Common Stock and Warrants, $71,094
of proceeds from certain notes payable and $140,448 as capital contributions
from Helionetics, which was offset by the payment of $157,543 on certain notes
payable.
The Company has historically financed its operations through working
capital provided from operations, loans and the private placement of equity and
debt securities. The Company has significant debts, which will require
additional financing in order to repay such debts in full. The Company has
approximately $1,300,000 of cash on hand, as of March 31, 1999. The Company will
require additional financing to implement the Company's business plan. The
Company's day-to-day operations require cash of approximately $150,000 per month
or an aggregate of $1,800,000 over the next twelve (12) months. In addition,
management believes that the Company will require approximately $1,200,000 over
the next twelve (12) month period following the date of this Report to finance
continued development of its psoriasis laser system. Additional amounts may be
required to pay various costs of operations such as professional and consulting
fees.
Management believes that approximately $750,000 of anticipated revenues
will be generated from the sale of lasers to Baxter under the Baxter Agreement
in 1999. Approximately $1,200,000 of the Company's debts may be assumed by the
purchaser of the Company's non-excimer laser assets and business. However, no
assurance to this effect can be given. Therefore, to finance its business plan
completely, the Company will be required to raise debt or equity of at least
$5,000,000 before the end of the third quarter of 1999 to sustain the required
levels of operations for a period of at least twelve (12) months following the
date of this Report. Upon completion of the development of the psoriasis
product, the Company anticipates the need for as much as $50,000,000 to finance
the marketing plan for the Company's psoriasis product over and above the
$5,000,000 referenced in this paragraph. No assurance can be given that Baxter
will honor the Baxter Agreement or that additional financing will become
available to the Company, or at all, or that the business of the Company will
ever achieve profitable operations. Further, any additional financing may be
senior to the Company's Common Stock or result in significant dilution to the
holders of the Company's Common Stock. In the event the Company does not receive
any such financing or generate profitable operations, management may have to
suspend or discontinue its business activity or certain components thereof in
its present form or cease operations altogether. See "Business-Excimer Laser
System for the Treatment of Psoriasis" and "Item 8 - Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data" and "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
The Company's ability to expand business operations is currently
dependent on financing from external sources. There can be no assurance that
changes in the Company's research and development plans or other changes
affecting the Company's operating expenses and business strategy will not result
in the expenditure of such resources before such time or that the Company will
be able to develop profitable operations prior to such date, or at all, or that
the Company will not require additional financing at or prior to such time in
order to continue operations and product development. There can be no assurance
that additional capital will be available on terms favorable to the Company, if
at all. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of
additional equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such
securities could result in additional dilution to the Company's stockholders.
Moreover, the Company's cash requirements may vary materially from those now
planned because of results of research and development, product testing, changes
in the focus and direction of the Company's research and development programs,
competitive and technological advances, the level of working capital required to
sustain the Company's planned growth, litigation, operating results, including
the extent and duration of operating losses, and other factors. In the event
that the Company experiences the need for additional capital, and is not able to
generate capital from financing sources or from future operations, management
may be required to modify, suspend or discontinue the business plan of the
Company. See "Risk Factors."
SEASONAL FACTORS
Seasonality is not a significant factor in medical laser sales.
Budgetary cycles and funding are spread out in various hospitals, chains and
organizations, so that funding is not as cyclical as in the scientific laser
market.
44
<PAGE>
IMPACT OF INFLATION
The Company has not operated in a highly inflationary period, and its
management does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on sales or
expenses.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") recently issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," which is required to be adopted
as of December 31, 1999. SFAS No. 133 establishes standards for reporting
financial and descriptive information regarding derivatives and hedging
activity. Since the Company does not have any derivative instruments, this
standard will have no impact on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.
FASB 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits" and FASB 134, "Accounting for Mortgage-Backed
Securities Retained after the Securitization of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale by
a Mortgage Banking Enterprise," were issued in 1998 and are not expected to
impact the Company's future financial statement disclosures, results of
operations or financial position.
YEAR 2000
One of the major challenges facing any company whose products or
services rely on the operation of computers or other equipment containing
computer chips is the issue of Year 2000 compliance. Many existing computer
programs use only two digits to identify a year in the date field. If not
corrected, many computer applications could fail or create erroneous results by
or at the Year 2000. The Company and third parties with which the Company does
business rely on numerous computer programs in their day-to-day operations. The
Company is evaluating the Year 2000 issue as it relates to the Company's
internal computer systems and third party computer systems with which the
Company interacts. The Company expects to incur internal staff costs as well as
consulting and other expenses related to these issues of no more than $10,000.
These costs will be expensed as incurred. In addition, the appropriate course of
action may include replacement or an upgrade of certain systems or equipment.
The Company plans to commence a program to contact its vendors and customers to
determine their compliance with the Year 2000 issue. The Company anticipates
that such program will be completed by the end of the second quarter of 1999.
There can be no assurance that the Year 2000 issues will be resolved in 1999.
The Company does not expect the Year 2000 issue to have a significant adverse
impact on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition.
45
<PAGE>
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is not currently exposed to market risks due to changes in
interest rates and foreign currency rates and therefore the Company does not use
derivative financial instruments to address risk management issues in connection
with changes in interest rates and foreign currency rates.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes and
Schedules of Laser Photonics, Inc. and subsidiaries including the consolidated
balance sheets at December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, included elsewhere in this Report, have
been so included in reliance on the report of Hein + Associates LLP, independent
certified public accountants, given on the authority of such firm as experts in
auditing and accounting.
The financial statements required by this Item 8 are included elsewhere
in this Report and incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable
46
<PAGE>
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT
The directors of the Company currently have terms which will end at the
next annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company or until their successors
are elected and qualify, subject to their prior death, resignation or removal.
There is no familial relationship among any of the officers or directors of the
Company. The following reflects certain biographical information on the current
directors and executive officers of the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITION AGE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Warwick Alex Charlton Non-Executive Chairman of the
Board of Directors 39
Raymond A. Hartman Director, President and Chief 51
Executive Officer
Chaim Markheim Director, Chief Operating Officer 53
and Chief Financial Officer
John J. McAtee, Jr. Director 61
Alan R. Novak Director 64
Steven A. Qualls Director and Executive Vice-President- 42
East Coast Operations
</TABLE>
WARWICK ALEX CHARLTON was appointed to the Board of Directors and
became the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors on March 8, 1999.
Mr. Charlton is a Vice President of Computer Science Corporation ("CSC") and is
also the Vice President and North American Practice Leader of CSC Healthcare,
Inc., where Mr. Charlton is responsible for business development and operating
performance. In his capacity at CSC, Mr. Charlton provides consulting services
to various businesses, including the Company, regarding the introduction of
medical technology for commercialization. CSC provides such services to the
Company in connection with a consulting agreement dated October 29, 1998. Mr.
Charlton has 19 years of business experience, consisting of ten years of line
management experience and nine years in the consulting profession (previously
with Booz Allen & Hamilton and the Wilkerson Group). Mr. Charlton received an
honors degree in Marketing from the University of Newcastle and an MBA form
Cranfield Institute of Technology. See "Business - Markets and
Marketing-Agreement with Computer Science Corporation," "Item 11 - Executive
Compensation of - Compensation of Directors" and "Item 13 - Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions."
RAYMOND A. HARTMAN was appointed to the Board of Directors in October,
1997, and also serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Laser
Photonics and Acculase. Mr. Hartman is responsible for the engineering and
development of the excimer laser, handpieces and fiberoptics for TMR. Prior
employment includes: Founder and President of Electrode Technology, Inc., Union
City, California; Vice President of Manufacturing and Research and Development,
Applied Medical Technology, Palo Alto, California. Mr. Hartman was an Assistant
Professor at the Ohio State University in Columbus Ohio, Business Law and
Marketing (Graduate School of Business); Business Policy (Graduate School of
Business) and Seapower and Maritime Affairs (ROTC). Mr. Hartman was a Lieutenant
in the United States Navy. He received his MBA from the Ohio State University,
and a BS with Honors in Chemistry at Montana State University.
CHAIM MARKHEIM was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company
in May, 1995. He also serves as the Company's Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Markheim was a director and the Chief Operating Officer
of Helionetics from May, 1992 until January, 1998. Helionetics filed a petition
for bankruptcy reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Act in
1997. Mr. Markheim acted as business consultant to a diverse group of companies,
including Helionetics from 1985 to 1992. From 1980 to 1985, Mr. Markheim served
in various financial positions with Campbell Soup Company. His last position was
Controller of the Beverage Division. From 1976 to 1980, Mr. Markheim served in a
number of financial positions with Atlantic Richfield Company. Prior to 1976, he
47
<PAGE>
was employed as an auditor with Coopers and Lybrand and Seidman & Seidman. Mr.
Markheim was a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of California.
Mr. Markheim holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from California
State University, at Northridge.
JOHN J. MCATEE, JR. has been a member of the Board of Directors of the
Company since March 4, 1998. From March 4, 1998 until March 8, 1999, Mr. McAtee
served as the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. From 1990 to
1996, Mr. McAtee was Vice Chairman of Smith Barney, Inc. (now Salomon Smith
Barney), one of the world's largest banking and brokerage firms. Before that, he
was a partner in the New York law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell for more than
twenty years. Mr. McAtee is a graduate of Princeton University and Yale Law
School. Mr. McAtee is also a director of U.S. Industries, Inc., a diversified
industrial management corporation, and Whitehall Corporation, which provides
products and services to the commercial and military markets.
ALAN R. NOVAK was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company in
October, 1997. Mr. Novak is Chairman of Infra Group, L.L.C., an international
project finance and development company. He is also Chairman of Lano
International, Inc., a real estate development company, and a director of
Strategic Partners (Holdings) Limited, an international airport and seaport
development company. Mr. Novak is a graduate of Yale University, Yale Law
School, and Oxford University as a Marshall scholar. Mr. Novak practiced law at
Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Swidler & Berlin, Chartered. His public service
includes three years as an officer in the United States Marine Corp., a U.S.
Supreme Court clerkship with Justice Potter Stewart, Senior Counsel, Senator E.
M. Kennedy, Senior Executive Assistant to Undersecretary of State, Eugene
Rostow, and Executive Director, President Johnson's Telecommunications Task
Force. Mr. Novak was appointed by President Carter and served for five years as
Federal Fine Arts Commissioner.
STEVEN A. QUALLS was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company
in May, 1995. Mr. Qualls has been an employee of the Company since 1987 and
currently serves as the Company's Executive Vice President. He previously served
as the Company's General Manager, Chief Operating Officer, President and Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Qualls holds an MBA from the Crummer Graduate School of
Business at Rollins College in Winter Park, Florida, and received a BS in
Physics from the University of Central Florida.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors and executive
officers and beneficial holders of more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock
to file with the Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes
in ownership and reports of changes in ownership of such equity securities of
the Company. As of the date of this Report, the Company believes that all
reports needed to be filed have been filed in a timely manner for the year ended
December 31, 1998.
LIMITATION ON DIRECTORS' LIABILITIES. Pursuant to the Company's
Certificate of Incorporation and under Delaware law, directors of the Company
are not liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty, except for liability in connection with a breach of
duty of loyalty, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, for dividend payments or
stock repurchases illegal under Delaware law or any transaction in which a
director has derived an improper personal benefit.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
48
<PAGE>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
compensation of certain of the Company's executive officers,
including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and all executive officers (the
"Named Executives") whose total annual salary and bonus exceeded $100,000, for
the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Long Term Compensation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
AWARDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAYOUTS
-----------------------------------------
Name and Restricted Securities
Principal Other annual Stock Underlying LTIP All other
Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation Awards (s) Options/SARs Payouts Compensation
($) ($) (#) ($) ($)
- ------------------------ ----- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Steven A. Qualls 1997 $ 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
(CEO)(1) 1996 $ 75,000 0 0 $15,000 $60,000 0 0
Raymond A. 1998 $ 125,008 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hartman (CEO)(2) 1997 $ 125,000(3) 0 0 0 0 0 270
Chaim Markheim (COO) 1998 $ 125,008 0 0 0 0 0 0
- -----------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1) Mr. Qualls served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer until October,
1997.
(2) Mr. Hartman became the Company's Chief Executive Officer in October, 1997.
(3) Includes paid and accrued salary for each such fiscal year.
49
<PAGE>
OPTION/SAR GRANTS TABLE
The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of
stock options to certain of the Company's executive officers, including the
Named Executives for the year ended December 31, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Potential Realizable
Value at Assumed
Annual Rate of
Stock Price Appreciation
Individuals Grants For Option Term (1)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)
Number of % of
Securities Total
Underlying Options/
Options/ SARs Exercise
SARs Granted to Or Base
Granted Employees Price Expiration
Name (#) In Fiscal Year ($/Share) (1) Date (1) 5% ($) 10%($)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Chaim Markheim 250,000 64% 2.875 4/10/03 107,794 276,838
- --------------------------------
</TABLE>
1. This chart assumes a market price of $ 2.72 for the Common Stock,
the average of the bid and asked prices for the Company's Common Stock in the
Over-The-Counter Market as of December 31, 1998, as the assumed market price for
the Common Stock with respect to determining the "potential realizable value" of
the shares of Common Stock underlying the options described in the chart, as
reduced by any lesser exercise price for such options. Further, the chart
assumes the annual compounding of such assumed market price over the relevant
periods, without giving effect to commissions or other costs or expenses
relating to potential sales of such securities. The Company's Common Stock has a
very limited trading history. These values are not intended to forecast the
possible future appreciation, if any, price or value of the Common Stock.
OPTION EXERCISES IN 1998
No Named Executive exercised any stock option in 1998.
1995 NON-QUALIFIED OPTION PLAN
On January 2, 1996, the Company adopted the Company's 1995
Non-Qualified Option Plan for key employees, officers, directors and
consultants, and reserved up to 500,000 options to be granted thereunder. The
option exercise price is not less than 100% of market value on the date granted;
40% of granted options vest immediately; 30% vest beginning one year after
grant; and the remaining 30% vest and may be exercised beginning two (2) years
from grant.
No options may be exercised more than ten (10) years after grant,
options are not transferable (other than at death), and in the event of complete
termination "for cause" (other than death or disability) or "voluntary"
termination, all "unvested" options automatically terminate.
On January 2, 1996, the Company granted a total of 335,000 options at
an exercise price of $1.50 per share to certain directors, employees and
consultants.
50
<PAGE>
LIMITATION ON DIRECTORS' LIABILITIES; INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws designate the
relative duties and responsibilities of the Company's officers, establish
procedures for actions by directors and stockholders and other items. The
Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws also contain extensive
indemnification provisions, which permit the Company to indemnify its officers
and directors to the maximum extent provided by Delaware law. Pursuant to the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation and under Delaware law, directors of the
Company are not liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages
for breach of fiduciary duty, except for liability in connection with a breach
of duty of loyalty, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, for dividend payments or
stock repurchases illegal under Delaware law or any transaction in which a
director has derived an improper personal benefit.
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS
The Company has no compensatory plans or arrangements which relate to
the resignation, retirement or any other termination of an executive officer or
key employee with the Company, a change in control of the Company or a change in
such executive officer's or key employee's responsibilities following a change
in control.
COMPENSATION AND AUDIT COMMITTEES; COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
The Board has a Compensation Committee comprised of John J. McAtee, Jr.
and Alan R. Novak, and an Audit Committee comprised of Chaim Markheim, John J.
McAtee, Jr. and Alan R. Novak. Messrs. McAtee and Novak may be deemed to be
outside/non-employee directors. The Board has no standing committee on
nominations or any other committees performing equivalent functions.
The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the annual salary and
bonus for each executive officer (consistent with the terms of any applicable
employment agreement), reviews, approves and recommends terms and conditions for
all employee benefit plans (and changes thereto) and administers the Company's
stock option plans and such other employee benefit plans as may be adopted by
the Company from time to time.
The Audit Committee reports to the Board regarding the appointment of
the independent public accountants of the Company, the scope and fees of the
prospective annual audit and the results thereof, compliance with the Company's
accounting and financial policies and management's procedures and policies
relative to the adequacy of the Company's system of internal accounting
controls.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS. Outside/non-employee members of the Board of
Directors receive options to purchase up to 20,000 shares of Common Stock as
compensation, on an annual basis, at an exercise price equal to the market price
of the Common Stock on the last trading day of the preceding year. The options
vest at the rate of 5,000 options per quarter during each quarter in which such
person serves as a member of the Board of Directors. The Company granted to each
of John J. McAtee and Alan R. Novak options to purchase up to 20,000 shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.875 per share for services rendered
during 1998; all such options are vested. The Company granted to each of Messrs.
McAtee and Novak, options to purchase an additional 20,000 shares of Common
Stock at an exercise price of $2.8125 per share for services to be rendered
during 1999. Of these options, 5,000 are vested as of the date of this Report.
Upon Mr. Charlton's joining the Company's Board of Directors on March 8, 1999,
he was granted two sets of options. The first consisted of options to purchase
20,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.8125 per share for
services to be rendered during 1999. Of these options, 5,000 are vested as of
the date of this Report. The second set of options consisted of options, all of
which are vested, to acquire up to 150,000 shares of Common Stock at $3.00 per
share. See "Business - Agreement with Computer Sciences Corporation" and "Item
13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
The Company has obtained directors' and officers' liability insurance
with a $2,500,000 limit of liability and a $2,500,000 excess coverage. The
policy period expires on February 24, 2000. The Company intends to renew such
policy or obtain comparable coverage after the expiration of such policy.
However, there can be no assurances to this effect.
51
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table reflects, as of April 6, 1999, the beneficial
Common Stock ownership of: (a) each director of the Company, (b) each Named
Executive (See "Compensation of Executive Officer and Directors"), (c) each
person known by the Company to be a beneficial holder of five percent (5%) or
more of its Common Stock, and (d) all executive officers and directors of the
Company as a group:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT #
NAME AND ADDRESS
OF BENEFICIAL OWNER NUMBER OF SHARES BEFORE OFFERING *
- ------------------- ---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Chaim Markheim(1) 320,250 3.13
Raymond A. Hartman(2) 340,250 3.32
Steven A. Qualls(3) 64,666 *
Alan R. Novak(4) 125,000 1.25
John J. McAtee, Jr.(5) 209,000 2.09
Calvin Hori and Hori
Capital Management, Inc.(6) 933,100 9.43
Platinum Partners, LP(6) 759,000 7.67
Warwick Alex Charlton (7) 155,000 1.54
Pennsylvania Merchant Group Ltd(8) 869,840 8.37
Richard Hansen (8) 869,840 8.37
Joseph E. Gallo, Trustee(9) 950,500 9.54
All directors and
Officers as a group
(6 persons)(10) 1,214,166 11.04
- -----------------------
</TABLE>
(FOOTNOTES CONTINUE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE)
<PAGE>
(FOOTNOTES FROM THE PRIOR PAGE)
# Pursuant to the rules of the Commission, shares of Common Stock which
an individual or group has a right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to the
exercise of options or warrants are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group, but are not
deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership
of any other person shown in the table.
* Less than 1%.
1. Includes options to purchase up to 320,250 shares of Common Stock.
Mr. Markheim's address is 2431 Impala Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.
2. Includes options to purchase up to 330,250 shares of Common Stock
registered in his name and options to purchase up to 10,000 shares of Common
Stock registered in the name of his wife, Sandra Hartman. Mr. Hartman's address
is 2431 Impala Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.
3. Includes 4,666 shares of Common Stock and options to purchase up to
60,000 shares of Common Stock. Mr. Qualls' address is 12351 Research Parkway,
Orlando, Florida 32826.
4. Includes 28,601 shares of Common Stock, which are being registered
on Form S-1 and options to purchase up to 96,399 shares of Common Stock. Does
include options to purchase up to 25,000 shares of Common Stock, which are
vested, and does not include 15,000 options, which may vest periodically during
the course of the year. Mr. Novak's address is 3050 K Street, NW, Suite 105,
Washington, D.C. 20007.
5. Includes 99,000 shares of Common Stock, including 84,000 of which
are being registered on Form S-1 and options to purchase up to 110,000 shares of
Common Stock. Does include options to purchase up to 25,000 shares of Common
Stock, which are vested, and does not include 15,000 options, which may vest
periodically during the course of the year. Mr. McAtee's address is Two
Greenwich Plaza, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830.
6. The listed persons, Calvin Hori ("Hori"), Hori Capital Management,
Inc. ("Hori Capital") and Platinum Partners, LP ("Platinum") have jointly filed
an Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13D (the "Schedule 13D"), dated December 1, 1997,
with respect to 933,100 shares of Common Stock. The Schedule 13D provides, in
pertinent part, that: (a) Hori, Hori Capital and Platinum may be deemed to be
the beneficial owners of 759,000 of these shares, and (b) Hori and Hori Capital
may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of an additional 174,100 of these
shares. The address for each of the listed persons is One Washington Mall,
Boston, Massachusetts 02108.
7. Includes options to purchase 155,000 shares of Common Stock. Does
not include options to purchase up to 15,000 shares of Common Stock, which may
vest subject to certain schedules periodically during the course of the year.
Mr. Charlton's address is 304 Old Colony Road, Hartsdale, New York 10530.
8. Includes 369,840 shares of Common Stock and 500,000 Warrants
to purchase shares of Common Stock. This figure also includes 50,000 shares of
Common Stock owned by Penelope Hansen, wife of Richard Hanson in her own name.
Of the Warrants listed above, 75,000 are contingent on certain events occurring
and may vest at any time. PMG and Mr. Hansen's address is Four Falls Corp
Center, West Conshocken, PA 19428. See "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions."
9. Includes 888,000 shares of Common Stock and 52,500 Warrants to
purchase shares of Common Stock. Mr.Gallo is the Trustee of four (4) trusts
which own these securities. All of the shares of Common Stock and the shares
underlying the Warrants are being registered on Form S-1. In addition, three of
these trusts are entitled to receive additional shares which will be issued
subsequent to the date of this Report in exchange for accrued but unpaid
interest on loans made to the Company. As of the date of this Report the exact
amount of additional shares to be issued is unknown but the Company estimates
that the number will not exceed 25,000 shares. Mr. Gallo's address is 600
Yosemite Blvd., Modesto, CA 95354. See "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions."
10. Includes 132,267 shares of Common Stock and options to purchase up
to 1,106,899 shares of Common Stock. Does not include options to purchase up to
45,000 shares of Common Stock, which may vest subject to certain schedules. See
"Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
50
<PAGE>
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
CONVERTIBLE DEBT AND CONVERSION OF CONVERTIBLE DEBT
In 1995, the Company sold an aggregate of $500,000 in six-month
convertible secured notes in a private transaction, pursuant to an exemption
from registration under Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act. The
Company also issued to such persons warrants to purchase up to 500,000 shares of
Common Stock which expired in 1995 due to the Company's meeting of certain
filing requirements. The noteholders were also granted a transferable one-year
option to purchase 134,000 additional shares at $2.25 per share, and 134,000
shares at $3.00 per share, which were exercised in 1996, and 107,000 shares at
$3.75 per share, which expired without exercise. In January and April 1996, the
notes were converted into an aggregate of 538,583 shares of Common Stock at a
conversion price of $0.96 per share. In April 1996, an additional 30,000 shares
were issued pursuant to Regulation S as payment of past due rent valued at
$60,000.
During July and August, 1998, Acculase issued $1,000,000 of 10%
Convertible Promissory Notes (the "Convertible Notes"). The Convertible Notes
were guaranteed by the Company. Interest was payable annually and could be paid
in cash or in the Company's Common Stock at the Company's option. The entire
amount of principal was automatically converted in 500,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock, at a conversion price of $2.00 per share, on December
31, 1998. Additional shares will be issued subsequently in exchange for accrued
but unpaid interest. As of the date of this Report the exact amount of
additional shares to be issued is unknown but the Company estimates that the
number will not exceed 25,000 shares. The shares issued in conversion of the
Convertible Notes are being registered on Form S-1. At December 31, 1998, the
amount of accrued and unpaid interest on the Convertible Notes was $41,735.
As of March 31, 1999, PMG arranged for the Company to issue to various
investors $2,380,000 of units of its securities (the "Units"), each Unit
consisting of: (i) $10,000 principal amount of 7% Series A Convertible
Subordinated Notes (the "Subordinated Notes"); and (ii) common stock purchase
warrants to purchase up to 2,500 shares of Common Stock (the "Unit Warrants").
The entire principal is due and payable in one payment on the earlier of: (i)
December 15, 1999; or (ii) the date that is three business days after the
Company consummates its next equity financing (the "Subsequent Financing") in
which the Company receives net proceeds of at least $2,380,000 (the "Due Date").
Interest accruing on the Subordinated Notes through June 15, 1999 is payable on
June 15, 1999. Interest accrued as of the earlier of the Due Date or December
15, 1999, is payable on the earlier of the Due Date or December 15, 1999.
Payment of principal and interest on the Subordinated Notes is subordinate and
junior in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all senior debt of
the Company. The Subordinated Note holders may convert the Subordinated Notes
and accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, into shares of Common Stock at
any time prior to maturity or receipt of prepayment into shares of Common Stock
at a conversion price of $2.00 per share. The Subordinated Notes provide that
the conversion price is to be adjusted in the event that the Company issues
shares of Common Stock for consideration of less than $2.00 per share. In such
event, the per share conversion price will be adjusted to the issue price of
such additionally issued shares of Common Stock.
The Unit Warrants are exercisable into an initial 1,250 shares of
Common Stock at any time after purchase until March 31, 2004. The balance of the
Unit Warrants are exercisable into an additional 1,250 shares of Common Stock
(the "Contingent Shares") if the Unit holder has voluntarily converted at least
a portion of the principal amount of the Subordinated Note that make up a
portion of the Unit into shares of Common Stock. The amount of Contingent Shares
that may be acquired by a Unit Warrant holder will be proportionate to the ratio
of the amount of principal of the Subordinated Notes which are converted into
shares of Common Stock over the original principal amount of the Subordinated
Notes. The exercise price of the Unit Warrants will be the lower of (i) $2.00
per share of Common Stock; and (ii) the price per share of Common Stock in the
Subsequent Financing. The Unit Warrants provide that they may be adjusted in the
event that the Company issues shares of Common Stock for consideration of less
than $2.00 per share. In such event, the per share exercise price of the Unit
Warrants will be adjusted to the issue price of such additionally issued shares
of Common Stock. As of the date of this Report, no adjustments have been made.
All of the shares of Common Stock underlying the Subordinated Notes and the Unit
Warrants are being registered on Form S-1.
51
<PAGE>
CERTAIN ISSUANCES TO FORMER AFFILIATES
In February, 1996, the Company issued 25,000 shares of Common Stock to
Susan E. Barnes, the wife of Bernard B. Katz, a former director and Chairman of
the Board of the Company, in consideration for her personal guaranty of $81,000
in lease obligations associated with the Company's Andover, Massachusetts
facility. In February, 1996, the Company agreed to issue to Ms. Barnes 50,000
shares of Common Stock at a value of $1.00 per share for services she arranged
to provide in connection with raising $1.5 million to finance the Company's
emergence from the Bankruptcy Proceeding.
In October, 1996, the Company issued an additional 100,000 shares of
Common Stock to Ms. Barnes in connection with a second guaranty of the Andover
lease and lease extension, after the lease went into default and the landlord
was threatening immediate eviction. This second personal guaranty was secured by
a pledge of 391,360 shares of her personally owned Helionetics common stock. The
Andover lease was subsequently terminated. The Andover lease was the only lease
of the Company guaranteed by stockholders of the Company. All guarantees of Ms.
Barnes have been terminated.
ISSUANCE OF SHARES, OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
On January 2, 1996, the Company adopted the Company's 1995
Non-Qualified Option Plan for key employees, officers, directors and
consultants, and reserved up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock for which options
could be granted thereunder. On January 2, 1996, the Company granted a total of
335,000 options at an exercise price of $1.50 per share to certain directors,
employees and consultants.
During 1996, the Company issued 151,000 shares of Common Stock and
options to purchase up to 62,500 shares of Common Stock in exempt transactions
to key employees and consultants for services rendered and as compensation at an
exercise price of $2.50 per share. Included were issuances to certain current
and former officers and directors for services rendered, as follows: (i) Steven
A. Qualls (10,000 shares), (ii) Chaim Markheim (5,000 shares) and (iii) Maxwell
Malone (5,000 shares).
During 1997, the Company issued a total of 105,000 shares of Common
Stock to Don Davis, Esq. as a consultant in connection with legal services
rendered to the Company. The services included, but were not limited to, general
representation of the Company and securities disclosure work in relation to the
Company's continuing obligation to provide reports pursuant to the Exchange Act.
In addition, the Company issued, to Raymond A. Hartman options to acquire
250,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and
having a five-year term, contingent upon certain performance contingencies. On
April 5, 1999, the Company's Board of Directors deemed all such contingencies
fulfilled and the options vested.
On July 1, 1997, the Company granted a total of 108,500 options at an
exercise price of $1.00 per share to certain employees and consultants. On
October 31, 1997, the Company issued options to purchase up to 20,000 shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share to a former director of the
Company. In October, 1997, in satisfaction of all compensation owed by the
Company to K.B. Equities, Inc. ("KB Entities"), an affiliate of Mr. Katz and Ms.
Barnes, for consulting services rendered to the Company in 1997, the Board of
Directors granted options to acquire 100,000 shares of Common Stock to K.B.
Equities at an exercise price of $0.75 per share, and with a term of seven
years. Mr. Katz resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company on October
9, 1997.
In August, 1997, the Company issued options to purchase up to 211,899
shares of Common Stock to the following persons, who are currently officers and
directors of the Company, at an exercise price of $1.25 per share with a term of
five (5) years: (i) Chaim Markheim (20,250 options), (ii) Raymond A. Hartman
(20,250 options), (iii) Alan R. Novak (71,399 options), and (iv) John J. McAtee,
Jr. (100,000 options).
On December 15, 1997, the Company issued Warrants to PMG to purchase up
to 300,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, which
expire on December 15, 2002. The Warrants were issued to PMG as compensation for
past and future investment banking and advisory services. The 300,000 shares
underlying the Warrants are being registered on Form S-1.
In April, 1998, the Company issued options to Chaim Markheim to
purchase up to 250,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.875 per
share with a five (5) year term.
In April, 1998, the Company issued options to purchase up to 100,000
52
<PAGE>
shares of Common Stock, at the exercise price of $2.875 per share, with a
five-year term, and 20,000 shares of Common Stock, to certain consultants for
services rendered. The 20,000 shares were issued for services rendered at a
$1.00 per share.
Outside/non-employee members of the Board of Directors receive options
to purchase up to 20,000 shares of Common Stock as compensation, on an annual
basis, at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Common Stock on the
last trading day of the preceding year. The options vest at the rate of 5,000
options per quarter during each quarter in which such person has served as a
member of the Board of Directors. The Company granted to John J. McAtee and Alan
R. Novak options to purchase up to 20,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $2.875 per share for services rendered during 1998. The Company granted
to Messrs. McAtee and Novak an additional 20,000 options to purchase a like
number of shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.8125 per share for
services to be rendered during 1999. Of these options, 5,000 are vested as of
the date of this Report.
Upon Warwick Alex Charlton's joining the Company's Board of Directors
on March 8, 1999, he was granted options to purchase 20,000 shares of Common
Stock at an exercise price of $2.8125 per share for services to be rendered
during 1999. Of these options 5,000 are vested as of the date of this Report.
In 1999, in respect of the period August, 1998, through February, 1999,
the Company granted to its current legal counsel, Matthias & Berg LLP ("M& B"),
options to acquire an aggregate of 17,864 shares of the Company's Common Stock
at exercise prices of between $1.50 and $2.56 per share. The options are
exercisable for a period of 120 months from the date of grant. These options
were issued as a part of a fee agreement between the Company and M&B, whereby
M&B received options having an exercise price equal to 20% of its monthly fees
in the form of common stock of the Company valued at the closing bid price on
the last day of each month. M&B agreed to forego collection of such fees, and
use the uncollected fees to exercise the options by cancellation of the
outstanding fees.
On April 5, 1999, the Company issued to a non-executive employee
options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise
price of $3.1875. Such options vest, pursuant to a schedule, over a period of
five years.
CERTAIN ISSUANCES OF SECURITIES
In September and October, 1997, the Company privately sold a total of
679,500 restricted shares of Common Stock in a private placement at a price of
$1.25 per share. The price of the Common Stock on the date of this transaction
was $2.50 per share. The Company sold an additional 28,601 shares at a price of
$1.25 per share in the third quarter of 1997. The price of the Common Stock on
the date of this transaction was $2.56 per share. These funds were used in part
to pay outstanding accounts payable and to make a partial payment on delinquent
Federal and State taxes outstanding. See "Item 7 - Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
In September, 1997, PMG purchased from Helionetics, with the approval
of the Federal Bankruptcy Court in the pending Helionetics Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
proceeding, all debt owed by Acculase to Helionetics. In October, 1997, the
Company purchased the debt owing by Acculase, in the amount of $2,159,708 from
PMG in consideration of 800,000 shares of Common Stock.
In November, 1997, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock
and 750,000 warrants (the "Warrants"), with an exercise price of $4.00 per share
and a term of five (5) years, in a private placement, resulting in gross
proceeds of $6,000,000 to the Company. The price of the Common Stock at November
30, 1997, was $5.06 per share. The Company also issued 150,000 Warrants and paid
a commission of $480,000 to PMG as a placement agent fee. The Warrants have an
exercise price of $4.00 per share. The Warrants provide that they may be
adjusted in the event that the Company issues shares of Common Stock for
consideration of less than $4.00 per share. In such event, the per share
exercise price will be adjusted to the issue price of such additionally issued
shares of Common Stock. In December, 1998, the Company issued shares of its
Common Stock at $1.50 per share. The effect of such issuance was to reduce the
exercise price of the 750,000 Warrants and the 150,000 Warrants issued to PMG,
at $1.50 per share. The Shares underlying these Warrants are being registered on
Form S-1. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations."
The Company has agreed to issue to PMG an additional 75,000 warrants
(the "Contingent Warrants") at a purchase price of $0.001 per share at such time
as any of the other 750,000 Warrants have been exercised. The Contingent
53
<PAGE>
Warrants will be exercisable for a period of five years following the date of
issue at an exercise price equal to the average closing bid price for the Common
Stock for the ten trading days preceding the date of issue. The Warrants may be
redeemed by the Company, upon 30 days' notice, at a redemption price of $0.10
per share if the closing bid price of the Common Stock exceeds $8.00 per share
for a period of thirty consecutive trading days.
In July, 1998, the Company granted warrants to acquire 300,000 shares
of Common Stock to PMG at an exercise price of $2.00 per share in consideration
for the guarantee, by PMG, of a lease of office space in Carlsbad, California by
the Company and the raising of a bridge loan of $1,000,000. Such Warrants are
exercisable at anytime until July 15, 2003. The shares underlying these Warrants
are being registered on Form S-1. See "Item 13 - Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions - Convertible Debt and Conversion of Convertible Debt."
On December 31, 1998, the Company sold to Mr. & Mrs. Richard A. Hansen
an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company's restricted Common Stock $1.50
per share. The price of the Common Stock at December 30, 1998, was $2.50 per
share. Mr. Hansen is the President of PMG, the Company's investment banker.
These Shares are being registered on Form S-1.
The Company believes that all such transactions with affiliates of the
Company have been entered into on terms no less favorable to the Company than
could have been obtained from independent third parties. The Company intends
that any transactions and loans with officers, directors and five percent (5%)
or greater stockholders, following the date of this Report, will be on terms no
less favorable to the Company than could be obtained from independent third
parties and will be approved by a majority of the independent, disinterested
directors of the Company.
54
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
A. Financial Statements
--------------------
Consolidated balance sheet of Laser Photonics, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998.
B. Reports on Form 8-K
-------------------
Not Applicable
C. Other Exhibits
--------------
27 Financial Data Schedule
- ----------------------
* Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The Company is currently subject to the reporting requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and in
accordance therewith files reports, proxy statements and other information with
the Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be
inspected and copied at the public reference facilities of the Commission at
Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549; at its New York
Regional Office, Suite 1300, 7 World Trade Center, New York, New York 10048; and
its Chicago Regional Office, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago,
Illinois 60661,and copies of such materials can be obtained from the Public
Reference Section of the Commission at its principal office in Washington, D.C.,
at prescribed rates. In addition, such materials may be accessed electronically
at the Commission's site on the World Wide Web, located at http://www.sec.gov.
The Company intends to furnish its stockholders with annual reports containing
audited financial statements and such other periodic reports as the Company may
determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law.
Certain documents listed above, as exhibits to this Report on Form
10-K, are incorporated by reference from other documents previously filed by the
Company with the Commission as follows:
55
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LASER PHOTONICS, INC.
Date: April 15, 1999 By: /s/ Raymond A. Hartman
-------------------------
Raymond A. Hartman
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
LASER PHOTONICS, INC.
Date: April 15, 1999 By: /s/ Raymond A. Hartman
-------------------------
Raymond A. Hartman
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Date: April 15, 1999 By: /s/ Chaim Markheim
-------------------------
Chaim Markheim
Director, Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: April 15, 1999 By: /s/ Steven A. Qualls
-------------------------
Steven A. Qualls
Director and Executive Vice
President
Date: April 15, 1999 By: /s/ Alan R. Novak
-------------------------
Alan R. Novak
Director
Date: April 15, 1999 By: /s/ John J. McAtee, Jr
-------------------------
John J. McAtee, Jr.
Director
Date: April 15, 1999 By: /s/ Warwick Alex Charlton
-------------------------
Warwick Alex Charlton
Chairman of the Board of Directors
56
<PAGE>
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
----
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT.................................................F-2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - December 31, 1998 and 1997.....................F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - For the Years ended December
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.................................................F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY - For the Years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996........................................F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - For the Years ended December
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.................................................F-6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS...................................F-7
F-1
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Laser Photonics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
San Diego, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Laser Photonics,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1998.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Laser Photonics,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year period
ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Our audits referred to above include audits of the financial statement schedule
listed under Item 14(a)(2) of Form 10-K. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, in relation to the financial
statements taken as a whole, the information required to be stated therein.
/s/HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Orange, California
April 8, 1999
F-2
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
-------------- --------------
ASSETS
------
<S> <C> <C>
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 174,468 $ 1,225,932
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $68,000 and $75,000 in 1998 and 1997, respectively 34,676 343,465
Receivable from related party 54,600 25,000
Inventories 458,343 951,209
Prepaid expenses and other assets - 66,463
-------------- --------------
Total current assets 722,087 2,612,069
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net 127,190 141,432
PATENT COSTS, net of accumulated amortization of $32,318 and
$23,965 in 1998 and 1997, respectively 52,480 60,833
PREPAID LICENSE FEE, net of accumulated amortization of $541,667
and $41,667 in 1998 and 1997, respectively 3,458,333 3,958,333
EXCESS OF COST OVER NET ASSETS OF ACQUIRED COMPANY, net
of accumulated amortization of $1,862,296 and $1,342,614 in
1998 and 1997, respectively 476,273 995,955
OTHER ASSETS 33,932 39,682
-------------- --------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 4,870,295 $ 7,808,304
============== ==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current portion of notes payable and long-term debt $ 620,581 $ 573,782
Payable to related party 136,002 36,222
Accounts payable 404,666 859,559
Accrued payroll and related expenses 393,339 400,222
Other accrued liabilities 666,852 631,808
Deferred revenue 343,906 95,000
-------------- --------------
Total current liabilities 2,565,346 2,596,593
NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion 69,893 282,559
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF ASSETS HELD FOR SALE 393,665 -
-------------- --------------
Total liabilities 3,028,904 2,879,152
-------------- --------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 3, 8 and 11) - -
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock, $.01 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized,
9,895,684 and 9,247,083 shares outstanding in 1998
and 1997, respectively 98,957 92,471
Additional paid-in capital 17,439,904 14,625,564
Accumulated deficit (15,697,470) (9,788,883)
-------------- --------------
Total stockholders' equity 1,841,391 4,929,152
-------------- --------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 4,870,295 $ 7,808,304
============== ==============
</TABLE>
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
F-3
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Sales $ 1,580,422 $ 2,960,330 $ 2,901,454
Other 769,026 855,000 -
-------------- -------------- --------------
2,349,448 3,815,330 2,901,454
-------------- -------------- --------------
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of sales 1,806,557 2,090,276 2,329,299
Selling, general and administrative 3,608,108 2,181,304 1,158,841
Research and development 1,243,372 685,109 850,993
Bad debt expense related to related party receivable - 48,000 662,775
Impairment recognized on reorganization goodwill - - 1,486,823
Depreciation and amortization 1,088,649 741,481 1,214,876
-------------- -------------- --------------
7,746,686 5,746,170 7,703,607
-------------- -------------- --------------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS (5,397,238) (1,930,840) (4,802,153)
-------------- -------------- --------------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense (510,948) (386,069) (392,000)
Interest income 8,907 52,280 -
Other (6,008) (38,572) (163,815)
-------------- -------------- --------------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX (5,905,287) (2,303,201) (5,357,968)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (3,300) (3,900) -
-------------- -------------- --------------
NET LOSS $ (5,908,587) $ (2,307,101) $ (5,357,968)
============== ============== ==============
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE $ (0.64) $ (0.35) $ (0.95)
============== ============== ==============
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES 9,287,507 6,531,190 5,619,668
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
F-4
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL
------------------------------- PAID-IN ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT TOTAL
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCES, January 1, 1996 5,000,000 50,000 2,760,028 (2,123,814) 686,214
Conversion of convertible debentures
and related accrued interest 538,583 5,386 519,896 - 525,282
Exercise of stock options 268,000 2,680 700,820 - 703,500
Stock issued for prior year services 148,500 1,485 171,640 - 173,125
Stock issued for rent 30,000 300 59,700 - 60,000
Stock issued as compensation 177,500 1,775 264,475 - 266,250
Capital contribution from Helionetics - - 853,669 - 853,669
Net Loss - - - (5,357,968) (5,357,968)
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
BALANCES, December 31, 1996 6,162,583 61,626 5,330,228 (7,481,782) (2,089,928)
Sale of stock and warrants, net of
expenses 2,179,500 21,795 6,237,282 - 6,259,077
Stock issued for services 105,000 1,050 94,575 - 95,625
Stock issued to purchase debt and
accrued interest 800,000 8,000 2,151,708 - 2,159,708
Capital contributions from Helionetics - - 140,448 - 140,448
Compensation recognized upon issuance
of stock options - - 671,323 - 671,323
Net Loss - - - (2,307,101) (2,307,101)
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
BALANCES, December 31, 1997 9,247,083 92,471 14,625,564 (9,788,883) 4,929,152
Conversion of convertible notes payable 600,000 6,000 1,144,000 - 1,150,000
Sale of stock 28,601 286 35,465 - 35,751
Warrants issued for services - - 1,318,200 - 1,318,200
Stock issued for services 20,000 200 19,800 - 20,000
Allocation of proceeds from notes payable
due to beneficial conversion feature - - 296,875 - 296,875
Net Loss - - - (5,908,587) (5,908,587)
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
BALANCES, December 31, 1998 9,895,684 $ 98,957 $ 17,439,904 $ (15,697,470) $ 1,841,391
============== ============== ============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
F-5
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss $ (5,908,587) $ (2,307,101) $ (5,357,968)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,088,650 741,581 1,214,876
Amortization of debt issuance costs 296,875 - -
Impairment recognized on reorganization goodwill - - 1,486,823
Bad debt expense related to related party receivable - 48,000 662,775
Allowance for doubtful accounts - (25,000) -
Stock issued to pay interest - 168,268 25,282
Warrants issued for services 1,318,200 - -
Stock issued for services 20,000 95,625 -
Stock issued for rent - - 60,000
Stock issued as compensation - - 266,250
Compensation recognized upon issuance of stock
options - 671,323 -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 168,789 64,970 (127,066)
Inventories 40,105 (60,198) (35,147)
Prepaid expenses and other assets (1,576) (63,350) 16,838
Accounts payable 355,379 161,273 17,830
Accrued payroll and related expenses 36,893 (270,259) 317,923
Accrued research consulting fees 291,000 - -
Other accrued liabilities (37,864) (313,983) 440,995
Deferred revenue 248,906 95,000 -
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash used in operating activities (2,083,230) (993,851) (1,010,589)
-------------- -------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisitions of property and equipment (116,158) (37,541) (16,024)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment - 19,174 -
Acquisition of patents and licenses - (4,001,926)
Advances to related parties (29,600) (73,000) (292,900)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash used in investing activities (145,758) (4,093,293) (308,924)
-------------- -------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of stock and warrants 35,751 6,259,077 -
Proceeds from notes payable 1,276,960 71,094 92,952
Payments on notes payable (135,187) (157,543) (67,647)
Capital contributions from Parent Company - 140,448 529,622
Proceeds from exercise of stock options - - 703,500
-------------- -------------- --------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,177,524 6,313,076 1,258,427
-------------- -------------- --------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (1,051,464) 1,225,932 (61,086)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period 1,225,932 - 61,086
-------------- -------------- --------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period $ 174,468 $ 1,225,932 $ -
============== ============== ==============
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest $ 137,572 $ 158,939 $ 189,021
============== ============== ==============
Income taxes $ - $ - $ -
============== ============== ==============
Non-cash transactions:
Conversion of convertible debentures to common stock $ 1,150,000 $ - $ 500,000
============== ============== ==============
Note payable issued to acquire leasehold improvements $ 70,000 $ - $ -
============== ============== ==============
Stock issued to purchase debt and accrued interest $ - $ 2,159,708 $ -
============== ============== ==============
Stock issued for accrued prior year services $ - $ - $ 173,125
============== ============== ==============
Reclassification of Helionetics advances to
additional paid-in capital $ - $ - $ 324,047
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
F-6
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS:
--------------------------------------
NATURE OF OPERATIONS - Laser Photonics, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") operates in one segment and is principally engaged in the
development, manufacture and marketing of laser systems and accessories
for medical and scientific applications and, through its approximately
76% owned subsidiary, AccuLase, Inc., is developing excimer laser and
fiber optic equipment and techniques directed toward the treatment of
coronary heart disease.
BANKRUPTCY FILING AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION - On May 13, 1994, the
Company filed a voluntary petition of reorganization with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court in the Middle District of Florida for protection under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Out of the
reorganization, Helionetics, Inc. (Helionetics) acquired a 75% interest
in the Company in exchange for cash and the contribution of its 76.1%
interest in AccuLase, Inc. Helionetics has since filed for bankruptcy
and sold its interests such that it is no longer an owner of the
Company.
The acquisition of AccuLase has been accounted for as a purchase and
the results of operations of AccuLase have been included in these
consolidated financial statements since May 23, 1995.
After emerging from the reorganization, all assets and liabilities of
the Company were restated to reflect their reorganization value in
accordance with procedures specified in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion 16 "BUSINESS COMBINATIONS" (APB16) as required by SOP 90-7,
"Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy
Code." The portion of the reorganization value that could not be
attributed to specific tangible or identified intangible assets was
classified as reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets ("Reorganization Goodwill") and was being amortized
over five years. Because of the magnitude of the Company's losses since
emerging from bankruptcy, the balance was considered impaired and
written off as of December 31, 1996.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
-------------------------------------------
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION - The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries,
Laser Analytics, Inc. and AccuLase, Inc. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - For purposes of the statements of cash flows,
the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS - In the event that facts and
circumstances indicate that the cost of long lived assets may be
impaired, an evaluation of recoverability would be performed. If an
evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
associated with the asset would be compared to the asset's carrying
amount to determine if a write-down to market value or discounted cash
flow value is required.
F-7
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION - The Company has elected to follow Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK ISSUED TO
EMPLOYEES" (APB25) and related interpretations in accounting for its
employee stock options. In accordance with FASB Statement No. 123
"ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION" (FASB123), the Company will
disclose the impact of adopting the fair value accounting of employee
stock options. Transactions in equity instruments with non-employees
for goods or services have been accounted for using the fair value
method as prescribed by FASB123.
REVENUE RECOGNITION - Revenues are recognized upon shipment of products
to customers. Deferred revenue relates to payments received under the
Baxter Agreement (See Note 11) in advance of delivery of related
product.
INVENTORIES - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market,
determined by the first-in, first-out method.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives (ranging from 3 to
7 years) of the respective assets. The cost of normal maintenance and
repairs is charged to operating expenses as incurred. Material
expenditures which increase the life of an asset are capitalized and
depreciated over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset. The
cost of properties sold, or otherwise disposed of, and the related
accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts,
and any gains or losses are reflected in current operations.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS - Patents and license fees are carried at cost less
accumulated amortization which is calculated on a straight-line basis
over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from eight
to twelve years.
Excess of cost over net assets of acquired company represents the
goodwill recorded by Helionetics for the purchase of AccuLase that has
been "pushed down" to the Company. The balance is being amortized using
the straight-line basis over 5 years.
ACCRUED WARRANTY COSTS - Estimated warranty costs are provided for at
the time of sale of the warranted product. The Company generally
extends warranty coverage for one year from the date of sale.
USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of the Company's consolidated
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires the Company's management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
The Company's financial statements are based upon a number of
significant estimates, including the allowance for doubtful accounts,
obsolescence of inventories, the estimated useful lives selected for
property and equipment and intangible assets, realizability of deferred
tax assets, estimated future warranty costs, and penalties and interest
F-8
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for delinquent payroll taxes. Due to the uncertainties inherent in the
estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that these
estimates will be further revised in the near term and such revisions
could be material.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT - Research and development costs are charged
to operations in the period incurred.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK - Credit risk represents the accounting
loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties
failed completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit
risk (whether on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial
instruments exist for groups of customers or counterparties when they
have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to
meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in
economic or other conditions described below. In accordance with FASB
Statement No. 105, "DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK" the credit risk amounts shown do not
take into account the value of any collateral or security.
The Company operates primarily in one industry segment and a geographic
concentration exists because the Company's customers are generally
located in the United States. Financial instruments that subject the
Company to credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable.
As of December 31, 1998, the Company maintained cash in banks that was
approximately $28,000 in excess of the federally insured limit.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - The estimated fair values for
financial instruments under FAS No. 107, "DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE
OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS", are determined at discrete points in time
based on relevant market information. These estimates involve
uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The fair value
of cash is based on its demand value, which is equal to its carrying
value. The fair values of notes payable are based on borrowing rates
that are available to the Company for loans with similar terms,
collateral, and maturity. The estimated fair values of notes payable
approximate their carrying values.
INCOME TAXES - The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "ACCOUNTING FOR
INCOME TAXES". Under the asset and liability method of Statement 109,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the
period that includes the enactment date.
LOSS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES - Basic earnings per share
excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing income available to
common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the
F-9
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to
issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or
resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the
earnings of the entity. Common stock equivalents as of December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 were anti-dilutive and excluded in the earnings per
share computation.
IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED STANDARDS - In June 1998, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133 (FASB133), "ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND
HEDGING ACTIVITIES," This statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 1999. Earlier application is encouraged;
however, the Company does not anticipate adopting FASB133 until the
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2000. FASB133 requires that an entity
recognize all derivatives as assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. The
Company does not believe the adoption of FASB133 will have a material
impact on assets, liabilities or equity. The Company has not yet
determined the impact of FASB133 on the income statement or the impact
on comprehensive income.
FASB132, "EMPLOYERS' DISCLOSURES ABOUT PENSIONS AND OTHER
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS" and FASB134, "ACCOUNTING FOR MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITIES RETAINED AFTER THE SECURITIZATION OF MORTGAGE LOANS HELD FOR
SALE BY A MORTGAGE BANKING ENTERPRISE" were issued in 1998 and are not
expected to impact the Company's future financial statement
disclosures, results of operations or financial position.
RECLASSIFICATIONS - Certain reclassifications have been made to prior
year's consolidated financial statements to conform with the current
presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net loss.
3. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
----------------------
As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has
reported significant net losses for the years ended December 31, 1998,
1997 and 1996 resulting in an accumulated deficit of $15,697,470 as of
December 31, 1998.
During 1997 and 1998, the Company took steps to mitigate the losses and
enhance its future viability, as follows: AccuLase entered into a
Master Technology Agreement with Baxter Healthcare Corporation (see
Note 11) under which AccuLase has received $1,550,000 and will receive
additional purchase commitments and future royalty payments. During
1998, the Company received proceeds of $1,150,000 through the issuance
of convertible debentures, which were converted into 600,000 shares of
the Company's common stock on December 31, 1998. The Company's board of
directors authorized management to pursue the sale of the assets of
Laser Photonics, Inc. and Laser Analytics, Inc. or consider the closure
of their operations. Additionally, during March 1999, the Company
issued convertible notes generating gross proceeds of approximately
$2,300,000 to the Company. Also, the Company anticipates delivering
certain lasers to Baxter under its agreement with them during the
second quarter of 1999 which will generate an additional $600,000 cash
to the Company. Finally, management expects to raise additional working
F-10
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
capital through the issuance of debt and equity securities. Management
believes that these actions will allow the Company to continue as a
going concern.
4. INVENTORIES:
------------
Inventories are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials $ 229,199 $ 1,255,107
Work-in-progress 249,144 435,854
Finished goods - 79,772
-------------- --------------
478,343 1,770,733
Allowance for obsolescence (20,000) (819,524)
-------------- --------------
$ 458,343 $ 951,209
============== ==============
</TABLE>
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
-----------------------
Property and equipment consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Machinery and equipment $ 18,434 $ 248,439
Furniture and fixtures 49,988 53,708
Leasehold improvements 76,688 -
-------------- --------------
145,110 302,147
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (17,920) (160,715)
-------------- --------------
$ 127,190 $ 141,432
============== ==============
</TABLE>
Depreciation expense amounted to $60,615, $171,777 and $258,304 in
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
F-11
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
6. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES:
--------------------------
Other accrued liabilities consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accrued consulting fees $ 291,000 $ -
Accrued interest 163,983 87,482
Accrued property taxes 41,918 123,828
Accrued royalty 62,020 54,733
Accrued warranty - 100,000
Customer deposits - 76,588
Other accrued liabilities 107,931 189,177
-------------- --------------
$ 666,852 $ 631,808
============== ==============
</TABLE>
7. NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT:
---------------------------------
Notes payable and long-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Notes payable - unsecured creditors, interest at prime rate,
quarterly interest only payments beginning October 1, 1995,
principal due October 1, 1999, unsecured. $ 282,559 $ 282,559
Notes payable - unsecured creditors, interest at prime rate,
quarterly interest only payments beginning October 1, 1995,
principal due October 1, 1999, unsecured. Interest past due. 165,298 165,298
Note payable - creditor, interest at 10%, monthly interest
only payments through May 5, 1997, thereafter monthly
interest and principal payments of $6,384 through May 1999,
unsecured. Payments past due. 127,860 127,860
Note payable - U.S. Treasury, interest at 9%, payable in
monthly principal and interest installments through July
2000, unsecured. Payments past due. 58,554 131,094
</TABLE>
F-12
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C>
Notes payable - various creditors, interest at 9%, payable in
various monthly principal and interest installments through
July 2000, unsecured. Payments past due. 85,250 100,726
Note payable - creditor, interest at 9%, payable in monthly
principal and interest installments of $1,258 through January
2001, collateralized by personal property of the Company.
Payments past due. 28,813 48,804
Note payable - lessor, interest at 10%, payable in monthly
principal and interest installments of $1,775 through
December 31, 2002, unsecured. 70,000 -
-------------- --------------
818,334 856,341
Less amount included in liabilities in excess of assets held for sale (127,860) -
Less current maturities (620,581) (573,782)
-------------- --------------
$ 69,893 $ 282,559
============== ==============
</TABLE>
As a result of the past due payments on some of the notes listed above,
the notes are callable at the option of the holder. Therefore, these
notes have been classified as current. Aggregate maturities required on
notes payable and long-term debt at December 31, 1998 are due in future
years as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1999 $ 748,441
2000 26,274
2001 23,425
2002 20,194
--------------
$ 818,334
==============
</TABLE>
8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
---------------------
In 1995, the Company sold an aggregate of $500,000 in six month
convertible, secured notes in a private transaction to four offshore
corporations. In January and April 1996, the notes and related accrued
interest were converted into 538,583 shares of common stock of the
Company.
In conjunction with the issuance of convertible notes payable in 1995,
the Company granted to the note holders a transferable one year option
to purchase 375,000 additional shares of the Company's common stock,
exercisable as follows: (1) 134,000 shares at $2.25 per share, (2)
134,000 shares at $3.00 per share, and (3) 107,000 shares at $3.75 per
share. During July and August of 1996, 268,000 of these options were
exercised for proceeds of $703,500. The remaining 107,000 options
expired during 1996.
F-13
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On January 2, 1996, the Company adopted the 1995 Non-Qualified Option
Plan (the Plan) for key employees, officers, directors, and
consultants, and provided for up to 500,000 options to be issued
thereunder. The option exercise price shall not be less than 100% of
market value on the date granted, 40% of granted options vest
immediately and may be exercised immediately; 30% vest and may be
exercised beginning 12 months after grant; and the remaining 30% vest
and may be exercised beginning 24 months from grant. No options may be
exercised more than 10 years after grant, options are not transferable
(other than at death), and in the event of complete termination "for
cause" (other than death or disability) or "voluntary" termination, all
"unvested" options automatically terminate.
In January 1996, the Board approved the grant of options to certain key
employees and consultants, to purchase 335,000 shares of common stock
under the Plan. On the date of grant, 110,000 options were vested and
the balance vested in 1997 and 1998. The options were granted with an
exercise price of $1.50 per share and are exercisable through January
2006.
In February 1996, the board approved the issuance of 50,000 shares of
common stock to the Company's chairman, and 98,500 shares of common
stock and options to purchase 62,500 shares of common stock to
consultants for services rendered during 1995. The options were granted
with an exercise price of $2.50 per share, are fully vested and are
exercisable through February 2001.
In April 1996, the board approved the issuance of 30,000 shares of
common stock as payment of past due rent valued at $60,000.
In October 1996, the Board approved the issuance of 125,000 shares of
common stock to the Company's chairman for consulting services rendered
and 52,500 shares of common stock to employees and consultants for
services rendered. The Company has recognized $266,250 in compensation
expense related to these services for the year ended December 31, 1996.
During May 1997, the Board granted options to purchase 250,000 shares
of common stock at $0.50 per share to the Company's president. The
options vest immediately and expire in May 2002. The Company has
recognized $62,500 in compensation expense related to these options for
the year ended December 31, 1997.
On July 1, 1997, the Board approved the grant of options to certain
employees and consultants to purchase 108,500 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options vest immediately and
expire in July 2007. The Company has recognized $56,030 in compensation
expense related to these options for the year ended December 31, 1997.
During August 1997, the Board granted options to purchase 211,899
shares of common stock at $1.25 per share to certain officers and
directors of the Company. The options vest immediately and expire in
August 2002. The Company has recognized $172,168 in compensation
expense related to these options for the year ended December 31, 1997.
F-14
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In August 1997, the Company's board of directors authorized the sale of
750,000 shares of common stock at $1.25 per share through an investment
banker ("the investment banker") pursuant to Regulation D under the
Securities Act of 1933. In 1997, the Company sold 679,500 shares of
common stock for $849,375. In 1998, the Company sold 28,601 shares of
common stock for $35,751.
On September 30, 1997, an investment banker purchased from the
Helionetics bankruptcy estate the note payable from AccuLase to
Helionetics in the amount of $2,159,708 including accrued interest.
During October 1997, the investment banker sold such note to the
Company for 800,000 shares of the Company's common stock.
On October 10, 1997, the Board granted options to a former director to
purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.75.
On October 31, 1997, the Board granted options to a former director to
purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00.
These options vest immediately and expire in October 2004. The Company
has recognized $380,625 as compensation expense related to these
options for the year ended December 31, 1997.
In October 1997, the Company's board of directors authorized the sale
of 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $4.00 per share through an
investment banker ("the investment banker") pursuant to Regulation D
under the Securities Act of 1933. Each share issued had attached a
share purchase warrant to purchase a share of common stock for each two
shares purchased in the offering for a period of five years at $4.00
per share. In the event these warrants are exercised, then the Company
must issue the investment banker one additional warrant for every ten
warrants exercised, exercisable for a period of five years at an
exercise price equal to the average closing bid price for the common
stock for the ten trading days preceding the date of issuance. As of
December 31, 1997, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock
for $6,000,000. In connection with this sale, the Company granted the
investment banker warrants to purchase 150,000 at $4.00 per share for a
period of five years. The warrants provide that they may be adjusted in
the event that the Company issues shares of common stock for
consideration of less than $4.00 per share. In such event, the per
share exercise price will be adjusted to the issue price of such
additionally issued shares of common stock. In December, 1998, the
Company issued shares of its common stock at $1.50 per share. The
effect of such issuance was to reduce the exercise price of these
900,000 warrants to $1.50 per share.
In April 1998, the Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock in
exchange for legal services of $20,000.
In April 1998, the Board granted options to purchase 390,000 shares of
common stock to certain officers and directors of the Company. The
options are exercisable at $2.88 per share which was the market price
on the date of grant. The options were fully vested at December 31,
1998 and expire in April 2003.
During July and August, 1998, the Company arranged to have AccuLase,
issue $1,000,000 of 10% convertible promissory notes to various
investors. The convertible notes were guaranteed by the Company.
Interest was payable annually in cash or in the Company's common stock
at the Company's option. The entire principal was due and payable in
one payment on or before December 31, 1998. The holders of the
F-15
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
convertible notes may convert any or all outstanding balances into the
Company's common stock at a conversion price of $2.00 per share at any
time. The market price of the Company's common stock on the date the
convertible notes were issued was $2.59 per share. The Company recorded
$296,875 as a deferred financing cost which was recorded as expense in
1998. All balances outstanding as of the maturity date of the
convertible notes, if not paid, automatically convert into shares of
the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $2.00 per share.
The holders of convertible notes converted the notes into 500,000
shares. Additional shares will be issued subsequently in exchange for
accrued but unpaid interest.
In addition, in December 1998, the Company issued a note payable to the
President of the Company's investment banker for $150,000 in cash. The
note is convertible to shares of the Company's restricted common stock
at $1.50 per share at the option of the holder of the note. The note
was converted to 100,000 shares of stock in December 1998.
In 1998, the Company issued warrants to acquire 600,000 shares of the
Company's common stock at $2.00 per share to its investment banker for
services provided. The Company recognized expense of $1,318,200 upon
issuance of the warrants.
A summary of option transactions during 1996, 1997, and 1998 under the
Plan follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AVERAGE
SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at January 1, 1996 - -
Granted 397,500 1.66
Expired/canceled - -
-------------- --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1996 397,500 1.66
Granted - -
Expired/canceled - -
-------------- --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1997 397,500 1.66
Granted - -
Expired/canceled - -
-------------- --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1998 397,500 1.66
============== ==============
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1998, all plan options to purchase shares were
exercisable at prices ranging from $1.50 to $2.50 per share.
F-16
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
If not previously exercised the outstanding plan options will expire as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AVERAGE
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
------------------------ -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
2001 62,500 $ 2.50
2002 - -
2003 - -
2004 - -
2005 - -
2006 335,000 1.50
-------------- --------------
397,500 $ 1.66
============== ==============
</TABLE>
A summary of non-plan option transactions during 1996, 1997, and 1998
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AVERAGE
SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at December 31, 1995 375,000 $ 3.00
Granted - -
Exercised (268,000) 2.63
Expired/canceled (107,000) 3.75
-------------- --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1996 - -
Granted 690,399 0.86
Expired/canceled - -
-------------- --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1997 690,399 0.86
Granted 390,000 2.88
Expired/canceled - -
-------------- --------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1998 1,080,399 $ 1.59
============== ==============
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1998, all non-plan options to purchase shares were
exercisable at prices ranging from $0.50 to $2.88.
F-17
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
If not previously exercised the outstanding non-plan options will
expire as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AVERAGE
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
------------------------ -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
2002 570,399 $ 0.87
2003 390,000 2.88
2004 120,000 0.79
-------------- --------------
1,080,399 $ 1.59
============== ==============
</TABLE>
As stated in Note 2, the Company has not adopted the fair value
accounting prescribed by FASB123 for employees. Had compensation cost
for stock options issued to employees been determined based on the fair
value at grant date for awards in 1998, 1997 and 1996 consistent with
the provisions of FASB123, the Company's net loss and net loss per
share would have increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net loss $ (6,784,686) $ (2,965,259) $ (5,502,273)
============== ============== ==============
Net loss per share $ (0.73) $ (0.45) $ (0.98)
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using
the present value of the exercise price and is pro-rated based on the
percent of time from the grant date to the end of the vesting period.
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during 1998,
1997 and 1996 was $1.97, $1.75 and $1.08, respectively. The following
assumptions were used for grants in 1998; risk-free interest rate of
5.6%; expected lives of two years; dividend yield of 0%; and expected
volatility of 137%. The following assumptions were used for grants in
1997: risk-free interest rate equal to the yield on government bonds
and notes with a maturity equal to the expected life for the month the
options were granted; expected lives of two years; dividend yield of
0%, and expected volatility of 134%. The following assumptions were
used for grants in 1996; risk-free interest rate of 4.9%; expected
lives of two years; dividend yield of 0%; and expected volatility of
148%.
AccuLase has reserved 800,000 shares of its common stock for issuance
under a noncompensatory employee stock option plan. Options are
exercisable over a period of up to ten years from the date of grant.
During 1993 and 1992, 5,000 and 28,500 options were granted at an
exercise price of $.10 and $2.80 per share, respectively. At December
31, 1998, all outstanding options are exercisable.
On February 4, 1998, the majority of the stockholders of the Company
voted to increase the authorized number of common shares to 15,000,000.
F-18
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
9. INCOME TAXES:
Income tax expense (benefit) is comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT
Federal $ - $ - $ -
State 3,300 3,900 -
-------------- -------------- --------------
3,300 3,900 -
-------------- -------------- --------------
DEFERRED
Federal - - -
State - - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
- - -
-------------- -------------- --------------
INCOME TAX EXPENSE $ 3,300 $ 3,900 $ -
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant
portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented
below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Current deferred tax assets:
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowances
for doubtful accounts $ 27,000 $ 29,000
Compensated absences, principally due to accrual
for financial reporting purposes 21,000 8,000
Warranty reserve, principally due to accrual for
financial reporting purposes 19,000 39,000
Inventory obsolescence reserve 409,000 316,000
Stock option compensation 769,000 260,000
Accrued expenses 63,000 35,000
Deferred revenue - 39,000
UNICAP 34,000 -
-------------- --------------
1,342,000 726,000
Less valuation allowance (1,342,000) (726,000)
-------------- --------------
Net current deferred tax assets $ - $ -
============== ==============
</TABLE>
F-19
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:
Tax credit carryforwards $ 334,000 $ 329,000
Net operating loss carryforwards 6,534,000 5,301,000
Depreciation and amortization 101,000 21,000
Capitalized research and development costs 339,000 323,000
-------------- --------------
7,308,000 5,974,000
Less valuation allowance (7,308,000) (5,974,000)
-------------- --------------
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets $ - $ -
============== ==============
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1998, Laser Photonics and AccuLase had net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $7,438,000 and $9,508,000, which
expire in various years through 2018. These net operating losses are
subject to annual limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code due
to change in control of the Companies.
Total income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying
the U.S. federal statutory tax rates to pre-tax income as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total expense (benefit) computed by
applying the U.S. statutory rate (34.0%) (34.0%) (34.0%)
Permanent differences 14.6 25.7 47.8
State income taxes - 0.2 -
Effect of valuation allowance 19.4 8.3 (13.8)
-------------- -------------- --------------
- % 0.2% - %
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
---------------------------
During April 1997, Helionetics filed a voluntary petition of
reorganization with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Central District
of California for protection under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code. As a result, the Company wrote off its $662,775
receivable from Helionetics as of December 31, 1996.
The Company advanced $48,000 to an affiliated company which was
subsequently written off during 1997.
The Company has agreed to pay commissions to an officer of the Company
for efforts in securing the Baxter Agreement (See Note 11). In 1998,
the Company recognized $72,000 of commission expense related to this
F-20
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
agreement. In addition, the Company has received advances from the
officer for operating expenditures. At December 31, 1998 and 1997, the
amounts due to the officer were $136,002 and $36,222, respectively.
At December 31, 1998 and 1997, the Company had $54,600 and $25,000 due
from an officer of the Company for advances made.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
------------------------------
LEASES - The Company leases its main facility under a month-to-month
operating lease which requires monthly payments of $11,000. AccuLase
leases its facility under a non-cancelable operating lease which
expires during 2003. The Company's other subsidiary leases its facility
under a non-cancelable operating lease which expires during 2001.
Rental expense for these leases amounted to $298,287, $346,260 and
$376,147 for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The future annual minimum payments under the
non-cancelable leases are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
<S> <C>
1999 $ 164,000
2000 170,000
2001 170,000
2002 97,000
2003 64,000
--------------
Minimum lease payments $ 665,000
==============
</TABLE>
BAXTER AGREEMENT - On August 19, 1997, AccuLase executed a series of
Agreements with Baxter Healthcare Corporation ("Baxter"). These
Agreements provided among other things for the following:
1. AccuLase granted to Baxter an exclusive world-wide right and
license to manufacture and sell the AccuLase Laser and disposable
products associated therewith, for the purposes of treatment of
cardiovascular and vascular diseases.
2. In exchange Baxter agreed to:
a) Pay AccuLase $700,000 in cash at closing, agreed to pay
AccuLase an additional $250,000 in cash three months after
closing, and agreed to pay an additional $600,000 upon delivery
of the first two commercial excimer lasers.
b) To pay AccuLase a royalty equal to 10% of the "End User Price"
for each disposable product sold, or if the laser equipment is
sold on a per treatment basis, the "imputed" average sale price
based on "non" per procedure sales.
c) To purchase from AccuLase excimer laser systems for
cardiovascular and vascular disease.
F-21
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
d) To fund the total cost of obtaining regulatory approvals
world-wide for the use of the AccuLase laser and delivery
systems for the treatment of cardiovascular and vascular
disease.
e) To fund all sales and marketing costs related to the
cardiovascular and vascular business.
3. AccuLase agreed to manufacture the excimer laser system to
specifications for Baxter. Baxter agreed to pay a fixed price per
laser for the first 8 lasers to be manufactured by AccuLase, and
thereafter to pay unit prices on a reducing scale of from $75,000
to $45,000 per laser, based upon the annual number of lasers sold
to Baxter.
4. AccuLase agreed for a period of five years not to engage in any
business competitive with the laser products for cardiovascular
and vascular applications licensed to Baxter.
5. AccuLase has granted Baxter a security interest in all of its
patents to secure performance under the Baxter Agreement. The
agreement expires upon the expiration of the last to expire
license patent, however, Baxter may terminate the agreement at any
time.
Revenues recognized on the Baxter Agreement in 1998 and 1997 were
$769,000 and $855,000, respectively, and represented 33% and 22%,
respectively, of total revenues.
LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH BAXTER AND LASER SIGHT - On September 23, 1997,
Baxter purchased certain patent rights to related patents from a third
party for $4,000,000. In December 1997, the Company acquired a license
to the acquired patent rights from Baxter. An agreement between the
Company and AccuLase to determine how costs will be allocated has not
yet been entered into.
LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH GENERAL HOSPITAL - On November 26, 1997, the
Company entered into a license agreement with The General Hospital
Corporation ("General") whereby General grants the Company an
exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license. In consideration for the
use of the license, the Company has agreed to pay General $12,500 for
costs incurred prior to the effective date of the agreement, $25,000
upon execution of the agreement, $50,000 upon issuance by the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office of any Patent right, and $50,000 upon
approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the First NDA
510(k), PMA or PMA Supplement. The Company has agreed to pay royalties
of 4% of the net sales price on products that are covered by a valid
claim of any patent right licensed exclusively to the Company, 2% of
net sales price on products covered by a valid claim of any patent
right licensed non-exclusively to the Company, 1% of net sales of
products on which no royalty is payable for the next ten years
following the first commercial sale and 25% of all non-royalty income.
CLINICAL TRIAL AGREEMENT WITH MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL - On March
17, 1998, the Company entered into a clinical trial agreement with
Massachusetts General Hospital. The Company has agreed to support the
clinical trials with a research grant of approximately $160,000,
payable $50,000 upon execution of the agreement, $60,000 upon
collection of final data from the study (which was completed in
December 1998) and $50,000 upon delivery of the final report to serve
as the basis for a 510 (k) submission to the FDA. At December 31, 1998,
$60,000 was accrued and payable under the agreement.
F-22
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AGREEMENT WITH CSC HEALTHCARE - In November 1998 the Company entered
into a consulting agreement with CSC Healthcare ("CSC") to assist the
Company in its commercialization efforts of its Excimer technologies.
For the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company incurred expense with
CSC of $157,600 for services under the agreement and $73,500 for
expenses. Additional consideration of $157,600 is payable in the event
that the company raises more than $6,000,000 in subsequent financing.
At December 31, 1998, $231,000 was accrued and payable under the
agreement.
PROPOSED SALE OF ASSETS - In December, 1998, the Company entered into a
letter of intent with a third party to sell certain assets of its
non-excimer laser business operations, subject to the assumption of
certain liabilities. The completion of the transaction is subject to
numerous items, including but not limited to, the execution of a final
written agreement. The assets and liabilities attributed to this
transaction have been classified in the consolidated balance sheet as
liabilities in excess of assets held for sale. The amounts are stated
at their carrying amounts which are less than their fair value as
estimated based on the expected proceeds from the proposed sale. The
amounts included in the financial statements at December 31, 1998
consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
ASSETS:
Accounts receivable $ 140,000
Inventories 452,761
Prepaid expenses and other assets 73,789
Property and equipment, net 139,785
--------------
Total assets 806,335
--------------
LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable 810,272
Accrued payroll and related expenses 43,776
Accrued property taxes 111,962
Other accrued liabilities 106,130
Note payable 127,860
--------------
Total liabilities 1,200,000
--------------
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF ASSETS HELD FOR SALE $ 393,665
==============
</TABLE>
Revenues of the related operations were $1,580,000, $2,960,000 and
$2,901,000 for 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Loss from the related
operations was $996,000, $647,000 and $926,000 in 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
F-23
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONS
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
BEGINNING COSTS AND END OF
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIOD EXPENSES DEDUCTIONS PERIOD
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1998:
Accumulated amortization - patent costs $ 23,965 $ 8,353 $ - $ 32,318
============== ============== ============== ==============
Accumulated amortization - excess of cost
over net assets of acquired companies $ 1,342,614 $ 519,682 $ - $ 1,862,296
============== ============== ============== ==============
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 75,000 $ - $ 7,000 $ 68,000
============== ============== ============== ==============
Allowance for inventory obsolescence $ 819,524 $ 239,776 $ - $ 1,059,300
============== ============== ============== ==============
For the year ended December 31, 1997:
Accumulated amortization - patent costs $ 15,612 $ 8,353 $ - $ 23,965
============== ============== ============== ==============
Accumulated amortization - excess of cost
over net assets of acquired companies $ 822,830 $ 519,784 $ - $ 1,342,614
============== ============== ============== ==============
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 100,000 $ - $ 25,000 $ 75,000
============== ============== ============== ==============
Allowance for inventory obsolescence $ 996,299 $ - $ 176,775 $ 819,524
============== ============== ============== ==============
For the year ended December 31, 1996:
Accumulated amortization - patent costs $ 7,259 $ 8,353 $ - $ 15,612
============== ============== ============== ==============
Accumulated amortization - excess of cost
over net assets of acquired companies $ 303,148 $ 519,682 $ - $ 822,830
============== ============== ============== ==============
Accumulated amortization - reorganization
goodwill $ 222,600 $ 1,914,425 $ - $ 2,137,025
============== ============== ============== ==============
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000
============== ============== ============== ==============
Allowance for inventory obsolescence $ 1,477,000 $ - $ 480,701 $ 966,299
============== ============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
F-24
<PAGE>
LASER PHOTONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended
December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1998
<CASH> 174468
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 34676
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 458343
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 722087
<PP&E> 0
<DEPRECIATION> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 4870295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2565346
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 98957
<OTHER-SE> 1742434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 4870295
<SALES> 1580422
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 2349448
<CGS> 1806557
<TOTAL-COSTS> 7746686
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 6008
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 510948
<INCOME-PRETAX> (5905287)
<INCOME-TAX> 3300
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (5908587)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (5908587)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED> (.64)
</TABLE>
