<PAGE>
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April __, 1996.
Registration Statement No. 33-___________
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
------------------------------------------------
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------------------------------
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
INDIANA 35-1544218
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
6712
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)
200 East Jackson Street
Muncie, Indiana 47305
(317) 747-1500
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of registrant's principal executive offices)
------------------------------------------------
Larry R. Helms With a copy to:
Senior Vice-President David R. Prechtel, Esq.
First Merchants Corporation Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
200 East Jackson Street 2700 Market Tower
Muncie, Indiana 47305 10 West Market Street
(317) 747-1500 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
(317) 635-8900
(Name, address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area
code, of agent for service)
Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the securities to
the public: As soon as practicable after the Registration Statement becomes
effective
If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. / /
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title of each class Amount Proposed Proposed Amount of
of securities to be maximum offering maximum aggregate registration
to be registered registered price per unit(1) offering price (1) fee
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common Stock, Up to
no par value 565,705 shares $ N/A $8,753,060 $3,018.06
</TABLE>
(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee and
calculated as of December 31,1995 in accordance with Rule 457(f)(2) on the
basis of the book value of the securities to be exchanged for the common
stock to be issued by the registrant.
-------------------------------------------------
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates
as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file
a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement
shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the
Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a),
may determine.
Page 1 of 156 Pages
Exhibit Index is on Page 148
<PAGE>
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET
FOR
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-4 AND PROSPECTUS
Items of Form S-4 Headings in Prospectus
----------------- ----------------------
1. Forepart of Registration Forepart of Registration Statement;
Statement and Outside Front Outside Front Cover Page
Cover Page of Prospectus
2. Inside Front and Outside Inside Front and Outside Back Cover
Back Cover Pages of Pages of Prospectus
Prospectus
3. Risk Factors, Ratio of Summary; Summary of Selected
Earnings to Fixed Charges Financial Data; Comparative Per
and Other Information Share Data
4. Terms of the Transaction Summary; General Information;
Proposed Merger; Federal Income Tax
Consequences; Comparative Per Share
Data; Comparison of Common Stock
5. Pro Forma Financial Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Information Financial Information
6. Material Contacts with the Not Applicable
Company Being Acquired
7. Additional Information Not Applicable
Required for Reoffering by
Persons and Parties Deemed
to be Underwriters
8. Interests of Named Experts Legal Opinions; Experts
and Counsel
9. Disclosure of Commission Not Applicable
Position on Indemnification
for Securities Act
Liabilities
10. Information with Respect to Summary of Selected Financial Data;
S-3 Registrants Comparative Per Share Data; Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information
11. Incorporation of Certain Incorporation of Certain Documents
Information by Reference by Reference
12. Information with Respect to Not Applicable
S-2 or S-3 Registrants
13. Incorporation of Certain Not Applicable
Information by Reference
14. Information with Respect to Not Applicable
Registrants Other Than S-3
or S-2 Registrants
15. Information with Respect to Not Applicable
S-3 Companies
<PAGE>
Items of Form S-4 Headings in Prospectus
----------------- ----------------------
16. Information with Respect to Not Applicable
S-2 or S-3 Companies
17. Information with Respect to Summary of Selected Financial Data;
Companies Other Than S-3 or Description of Randolph County;
S-2 Companies Randolph County's Management's
Discussion & Analysis of Financial
Condition & Results of Operations;
Regulation and Supervision of First
Merchants, Randolph County and
Subsidiaries; Comparative Per Share
Data; Index to Financial Statements
18. Information if Proxies, General Information; Proposed
Consents or Authorizations Merger; Description of First
are to be Solicited Merchants; Description of Randolph
County
19. Information if Proxies, Not Applicable
Consents or Authorizations
are not to be Solicited or
in an Exchange Offer
<PAGE>
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
122 West Washington Street
Winchester, Indiana 47394
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD
__________, 1996
To the Shareholders of
Randolph County Bancorp
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the call of the Board of
Directors, a Special Meeting of the Shareholders of Randolph County Bancorp
("Randolph County"), will be held on _______ ___, 1996, at ______ __.m. local
time, at the main office of The Randolph County Bank ("Bank") located at 122
West Washington Street, Winchester, Indiana.
The purposes of the Special Meeting are:
1. To consider and vote upon an Agreement of Reorganization and Merger
dated January 17, 1996 between First Merchants Corporation and Randolph County,
pursuant to which Randolph County will be merged with and into First Merchants
Corporation and the Bank will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of First
Merchants Corporation, as described in the accompanying Proxy
Statement-Prospectus; and
2. To transact such other business as may properly be presented at the
Special Meeting.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on _________ ___, 1996
will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting and any
adjournment thereof.
Shareholders of Randolph County are entitled to assert dissenters' rights
of appraisal in connection with the proposed merger under Chapter 44 of the
Indiana Business Corporation Law, a copy of which is attached as Appendix B to
the accompanying Proxy Statement-Prospectus.
_________ ___, 1996 By Order of the Board of Directors
Max Gordon, Chairman
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT - PLEASE MAIL YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY.
THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF HOLDERS OF AT LEAST A MAJORITY
OF THE OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY IS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
OF THE AGREEMENT OF REORGANIZATION AND MERGER.
IN ORDER THAT THERE MAY BE PROPER REPRESENTATION AT THE
MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND
RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS
OF
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
AND
PROXY STATEMENT
OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
COMMON STOCK
This Proxy Statement-Prospectus serves as a Prospectus with respect to a
maximum of 565,705 shares of common stock, no par value, of First Merchants
Corporation ("First Merchants") being offered to shareholders of Randolph County
Bancorp ("Randolph County") in connection with the proposed merger ("Merger") of
Randolph County with and into First Merchants. It also constitutes the Proxy
Statement of Randolph County to be used in connection with the Special Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on ________ ___, 1996, for the purpose of voting on
the Merger.
On the effective date of the Merger, Randolph County will merge with and
into First Merchants and each share of Randolph County common stock shall be
converted into the right to receive twenty and 53/100 (20.53) shares of First
Merchants common stock. First Merchants will pay cash for any fractional share
interests resulting from the exchange ratio.
The Merger is subject to the approval of the shareholders of Randolph
County, receipt of required regulatory approvals and certain other conditions
set forth in the Agreement of Reorganization and Merger (the "Agreement") dated
January 17, 1996, by and between First Merchants and Randolph County, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Appendix A. The Board of Directors of Randolph
County received the written opinion of Professional Bank Services, Inc.,
investment bankers, dated _______ ___, 1996, that the terms of the Merger are
fair from a financial point of view to Randolph County shareholders.
--------------------------------------------------
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN
APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, NOR HAS THE
COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR
ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION
TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
------------------------------------------------
The date of this Proxy Statement-Prospectus is _________ ___, 1996.
<PAGE>
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
First Merchants is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in accordance
therewith files reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Such reports, proxy
statements and other information may be inspected and copied at the public
reference facilities maintained by the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Judiciary Plaza, Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the Commission's
regional offices located at Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New
York 10048 and at Northwestern Atrium Center, Suite 1400, 500 West Madison
Street, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511. Copies of such material also can be
obtained at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Section of the
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549.
First Merchants' common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ National Market System and
such documents may also be inspected at the offices of the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc., 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.
First Merchants has filed with the Commission a Registration Statement on
Form S-4 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the
shares of First Merchants common stock to be issued in connection with the
Merger. This Proxy Statement-Prospectus does not contain all of the information
set forth in the Registration Statement, certain parts of which are omitted in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. Reference is made
to the Registration Statement, including the exhibits filed as a part thereof,
which can be inspected and copied at prescribed rates at the public reference
facilities maintained by the Commission at the addresses set forth above.
All information contained in this Proxy Statement-Prospectus with respect
to Randolph County and The Randolph County Bank ("Bank") has been supplied by
Randolph County and Bank, respectively, and all information contained in this
Proxy Statement-Prospectus with respect to First Merchants has been supplied by
First Merchants.
THIS PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS INCORPORATES DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE WHICH
ARE NOT PRESENTED HEREIN OR DELIVERED HEREWITH. THESE DOCUMENTS (EXCLUDING
UNINCORPORATED EXHIBITS) ARE AVAILABLE WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH PERSON (INCLUDING
ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER) TO WHOM THIS PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS IS DELIVERED UPON
WRITTEN OR ORAL REQUEST TO LARRY R. HELMS, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL
COUNSEL, FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION, 200 EAST JACKSON STREET, MUNCIE, INDIANA
47305 (317) 747-1500. IN ORDER TO ASSURE TIMELY DELIVERY OF SUCH DOCUMENTS, ANY
REQUESTS SHOULD BE MADE BY __________________, 1996.
The following documents previously filed by First Merchants with the
Commission pursuant to the Exchange Act are incorporated herein by reference:
1. First Merchants' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1995.
All documents subsequently filed by First Merchants pursuant to Sections
13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act prior to the date on which the
Special Meeting is held shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
this Proxy Statement-Prospectus and to be a part hereof from the date of filing
such documents.
Any statement contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded
for purposes of this Proxy Statement-Prospectus to the extent that a statement
contained herein or in any other subsequently filed document which also is or is
deemed to be incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes such
statement. Any such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed,
except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus.
<PAGE>
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY
REPRESENTATION OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS,
AND IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON
AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED. THIS PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO PURCHASE THE SECURITIES
OFFERED BY THIS PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS, NOR THE SOLICITATION OF A PROXY, IN
ANY JURISDICTION TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT WOULD BE UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER
OR SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER OR PROXY SOLICITATION IN SUCH JURISDICTION. NEITHER
THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS, NOR ANY DISTRIBUTION OF THE
SECURITIES COVERED HEREBY AT ANY TIME SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY
IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF FIRST MERCHANTS OR
RANDOLPH COUNTY SINCE THE DATE HEREOF OR THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN
IS CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF THIS PROXY
STATEMENT-PROSPECTUS.
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GENERAL INFORMATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROPOSED MERGER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Description of the Merger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Background and Reasons for the Merger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Opinion of Investment Banker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recommendation of the Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exchange of Randolph County Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rights of Dissenting Shareholders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resale of First Merchants Common Stock by Randolph County Affiliates .
Conditions to Consummation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Termination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restrictions Affecting Randolph County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Regulatory Approvals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective Date of the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management After the Merger. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nature of Trading Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Existing and Pro Forma Per Share Information . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . .
DESCRIPTION OF FIRST MERCHANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition Policy and Pending Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference. . . . . . . . . . . .
DESCRIPTION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Litigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . .
RANDOLPH COUNTY MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF FIRST MERCHANTS, . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RANDOLPH COUNTY AND SUBSIDIARIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank Holding Company Regulation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital Adequacy Guidelines for Bank Holding Companies . . . . . . . .
Bank Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank Capital Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Branches and Affiliates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<PAGE>
PAGE
----
FDICIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deposit Insurance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recent Legislation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMPARISON OF COMMON STOCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Authorized But Unissued Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preemptive Rights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend Rights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Voting Rights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dissenters' Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liquidation Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assessment and Redemption. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anti-Takeover Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Director Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LEGAL OPINIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EXPERTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER MATTERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
APPENDICES
A. Agreement of Reorganization and Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1
B. Indiana Business Corporation Law, Chapter 44
(Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1
C. Fairness Opinion of Professional Bank Services, Inc. . . . . . . . C-1
<PAGE>
SUMMARY
The following is a brief summary of certain information contained elsewhere
in this Proxy Statement-Prospectus and was prepared to assist shareholders in
their review of the Proxy Statement-Prospectus. This summary does not purport
to be complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of
this Proxy Statement-Prospectus and the appendices hereto.
THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETING:
Date, Time and Place __________ ____, 1996, at _____ o'clock
__.m., local time, at the main office of The
Randolph County Bank ("Bank"), 122 West
Washington Street, Winchester, Indiana 47394.
Purpose of the Meeting To consider and vote upon the Agreement of
Reorganization and Merger (the "Agreement"),
dated January 17, 1996 by and between First
Merchants Corporation ("First Merchants") and
Randolph County Bancorp ("Randolph County"),
pursuant to which Randolph County will merge
(the "Merger") with and into First Merchants
and the Bank will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of First Merchants. A copy of the
Agreement is attached to this Proxy Statement
Prospectus as Appendix A. See "NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS" and the
discussions under the captions "GENERAL
INFORMATION" and "PROPOSED MERGER."
Required Shareholder Vote Approval of the Agreement by the affirmative
vote, in person or by proxy, of the holders
of at least a majority of the outstanding
shares of Randolph County common stock is
required under Indiana law. Executive
officers and members of the Board of
Directors of Randolph County control in the
aggregate, directly and indirectly,
approximately 27.69% of the outstanding
shares of Randolph County common stock. Each
member of the Randolph County Board of
Directors has agreed to cause all shares of
Randolph County common stock beneficially
owned by him to be voted in favor of the
Merger. As of March 31, 1996, the members of
the Randolph County Board of Directors
beneficially owned 7,293 or approximately 26%
of the shares of Randolph County common stock
outstanding. See "GENERAL INFORMATION,"
"PROPOSED MERGER-- Conditions to
Consummation," "PROPOSED MERGER--
Recommendation of the Board of Directors,"
and "DESCRIPTION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY--Security
Ownership of Management."
Shares Outstanding and As of _______ ___, 1996, Randolph County had
Entitled to Vote 27,555 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding. Randolph County shareholders of
record at the close of business on ______
___, 1996 are entitled to notice of, and to
vote
i
<PAGE>
at, the Special Meeting of Shareholders. See
"GENERAL INFORMATION."
Proxies Proxies are revocable at any time before they
are exercised. See "GENERAL INFORMATION."
THE PARTIES TO THE First Merchants is a multi-bank holding
TRANSACTION: company organized under the laws of the State
of Indiana and headquartered in Muncie,
Indiana. First Merchants has three banking
subsidiaries, First Merchants Bank, National
Association ("First Merchants Bank"), First
United Bank and Pendleton Banking Company.
First Merchants' principal executive offices
are located at 200 East Jackson Street, Box
792, Muncie, Indiana 47305 and its telephone
number is (317) 747-1500. See "DESCRIPTION
OF FIRST MERCHANTS."
First Merchants has entered into a definitive
agreement to acquire Union National Bancorp
and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Union
County National Bank of Liberty. See
"DESCRIPTION OF FIRST MERCHANTS--Acquisition
Policy and Pending Affiliations."
Randolph County is a one bank holding company
organized under the laws of the State of
Indiana. The Bank is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Randolph County. Randolph
County's principal executive offices are
located at 122 West Washington Street,
Winchester, Indiana 47394 and its telephone
number is (317) 584-2501. See "DESCRIPTION
OF RANDOLPH COUNTY."
THE MERGER:
Description of the On the effective date of the Merger, Randolph
Merger County will merge with and into First
Merchants and the separate corporate
existence of Randolph County will cease. As
a result of the Merger, the Bank will become
a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Merchants.
First Merchants is accounting for the Merger
as a pooling of interests transaction. See
"PROPOSED MERGER--Description of the Merger."
Exchange of Randolph County On the effective date of the Merger, each
Common Stock outstanding share of Randolph County common
stock will be converted into the right to
receive twenty and 53/100 (20.53) shares of
First Merchants common stock. Cash will be
paid for fractional shares of First Merchants
common stock resulting from the exchange
ratio. See "PROPOSED MERGER--Exchange of
Randolph County Common Stock" and Appendix A
to this Proxy Statement-Prospectus.
ii
<PAGE>
Recommendation of the The Randolph County Board of Directors has
Board of Directors unanimously approved the Agreement and
unanimously recommends that Randolph County
shareholders approve the Agreement. Each
member of the Randolph County Board of
Directors has agreed to cause all shares of
Randolph County common stock beneficially
owned by him to be voted in favor of the
Merger. As of March 31, 1996, the members of
the Randolph County Board of Directors
beneficially owned 7,293 or approximately 26%
of the shares of Randolph County common stock
outstanding. See "PROPOSED MERGER --
Recommendation of the Board of Directors."
Reasons for the The Merger will provide the customers and
Merger communities that the Bank serves with
enhanced loan opportunities, additional
resources and banking expertise and the
opportunity to receive new and expanded
financial products and services. Randolph
County shareholders who receive First
Merchants common stock under the Agreement
may benefit from ownership in a company whose
common stock is traded in the
over-the-counter market and reported on the
NASDAQ National Market System, as there
presently exists no active trading market for
shares of Randolph County common stock. See
"PROPOSED MERGER--Background and Reasons for
the Merger."
Opinion of Investment The Board of Directors of Randolph County has
Banker received the written opinion of Professional
Bank Services, Inc., investment bankers,
dated _________ ___, 1996, that the terms of
the Merger are fair from a financial point of
view to the shareholders of Randolph County.
See "PROPOSED MERGER--Opinion of Investment
Banker" and Appendix C to this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus.
Conditions to the Consummation of the Merger is subject to
Merger certain conditions which include, among
others, the approval of the Agreement by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least
a majority of the outstanding shares of
Randolph County common stock, the receipt of
required regulatory approvals, the receipt of
a letter from First Merchants' independent
public accountants as to its ability to
account for the Merger as a pooling of
interests, and the receipt of an opinion
of counsel with respect to certain federal
income tax matters. See "PROPOSED MERGER--
Conditions to Consummation."
Termination of the The Agreement may be terminated before the
Merger Merger becomes effective upon the occurrence
of certain events, including, among others, a
material misrepresentation in or a breach of
the Agreement by First Merchants or Randolph
County, a material adverse change in the
financial condition of First Merchants or
iii
<PAGE>
Randolph County since September 30, 1995, the
failure of the Merger to qualify as a
tax-free reorganization, the failure of the
Merger to qualify for pooling of interests
accounting treatment, or the Merger not
having been consummated by September 30,
1996. See "PROPOSED MERGER -- Termination."
Effective Date of the First Merchants and Randolph County
Merger anticipate that the Merger will be completed
during the ______________ quarter of 1996.
See "PROPOSED MERGER--Effective Date of the
Merger."
Management and Operations As a result of the Merger, Randolph County's
After the Merger corporate existence will cease. Accordingly,
the directors and officers of Randolph County
will not serve in such capacities after the
effective date of the Merger. The directors
and officers of the Bank serving on the
effective date of the Merger will continue in
their respective positions after consummation
of the Merger, subject to the Bank's Articles
of Incorporation and By-Laws. In accordance
with the Agreement and in connection with the
first annual meeting of the shareholders of
First Merchants after the Merger, First
Merchants shall cause all necessary corporate
action to be taken to cause the current
Chairman of the Board of the Bank, Michael D.
Wickersham, to be nominated for election as a
member of First Merchants' Board of Directors
for a three (3)-year term. See "PROPOSED
MERGER-- Management After the Merger" and
"DESCRIPTION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY--Management."
Federal Income Tax In general, no gain or loss, for federal
Consequences to Randolph income tax purposes, will be recognized by
County Shareholders Randolph County shareholders with respect
to First Merchants common stock received in
the Merger. Gain or loss, for federal income
tax purposes, will be recognized, however,
with respect to cash payments made to
shareholders of Randolph County who perfect
their dissenters' rights or who receive cash
in lieu of fractional share interests
resulting from the exchange ratio.
Shareholders are urged to consult with their
tax advisors with respect to the tax
consequences of the Merger to them. See
"FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES."
Dissenters' Rights Shareholders of Randolph County have
dissenters' rights of appraisal established
by Indiana law entitling them to receive cash
for their shares of Randolph County common
stock. In general, to exercise these rights,
a shareholder must (1) deliver to Randolph
County before the vote on the Agreement is
taken, a written notice of the shareholder's
intent to demand payment in cash for the
shares of Randolph County common stock owned
by the shareholder, if the Merger is
iv
<PAGE>
effectuated; (2) not vote in favor of the
Agreement; and (3) follow all other
requirements of Indiana law. See "PROPOSED
MERGER--Rights of Dissenting Shareholders"
and Appendix B to this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus.
Resale of First Certain resale restrictions apply to the sale
Merchants Common Stock or transfer of the shares of First Merchants
common stock issued to directors, executive
officers and 10% shareholders of Randolph
County in exchange for their shares of
Randolph County common stock. See "PROPOSED
MERGER--Resale of First Merchants Common
Stock by Randolph County Affiliates."
Comparative Shareholder The rights of shareholders of First Merchants
Rights and Randolph County differ in some respects.
Upon completion of the Merger, Randolph
County shareholders who receive First
Merchants common stock will take such stock
subject to its terms and conditions. The
Articles of Incorporation of First Merchants
contain certain anti-takeover measures which
may discourage or render more difficult a
subsequent takeover of First Merchants by
another corporation. See "COMPARISON OF
COMMON STOCK."
Trading Market for There is currently no established trading
Stock market for shares of Randolph County common
stock. Shares of First Merchants common
stock are traded in the over-the-counter
market and are reported on the NASDAQ
National Market System. The closing price of
First Merchants common stock as reported by
the NASDAQ National Market System was $26.00
per share on November 16, 1995, the business
day before the Merger was publicly announced,
and was $______ per share on _______ ___,
1996. See "COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA."
v
<PAGE>
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA - FIRST MERCHANTS
The following summary sets forth selected consolidated financial
information regarding First Merchants. This information should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere within
this Proxy Statement-Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
(Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis) $29,245 $28,282 $26,806 $26,400 $23,277
Net Interest Income 27,881 26,983 25,508 25,210 21,957
Provision for Loan Losses 640 782 1,014 1,357 1,401
Net Interest Income After
Provision for Loan Losses 27,241 26,201 24,494 23,853 20,556
Total Other Income 6,907 6,298 6,588 5,576 5,229
Total Other Expenses 18,842 18,434 18,214 17,603 15,792
Income Before Income Tax
Expense and Change in
Accounting Method 15,306 14,065 12,868 11,826 9,993
Net Income 9,858 9,158 8,699 7,785 6,759
PER SHARE DATA (1)
Income Before Change in
Accounting Methods $1.95 $1.80 $1.65 $1.53 $1.39
Net Income 1.95 1.80 1.70 1.53 1.39
Cash Dividends Paid .77 .71 .63 .57 .53
December 31 Book Value 15.92 14.07 13.53 12.53 11.57
December 31 Market Value
(Bid Price) 25.75 20.83 19.33 19.00 12.45
AVERAGE BALANCES
Total Assets $665,347 $634,868 $626,398 $603,067 $560,412
Total Loans 413,940 388,639 357,028 329,750 300,276
Total Deposits 538,539 514,029 517,826 501,526 441,302
Total Stockholders' Equity 76,001 70,104 66,887 61,246 54,473
YEAR-END BALANCES
Total Assets $707,859 $644,606 $626,113 $616,859 $596,573
Total Loans 419,730 401,605 376,872 350,308 323,382
Total Deposits 588,156 529,830 506,302 511,971 484,824
Total Stockholders' Equity 80,473 71,018 68,804 63,935 58,472
vi
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Return on Average Assets 1.48% 1.44% 1.39% 1.29% 1.21%
Return on Average
Stockholders' Equity 12.97 13.06 13.01 12.71 12.41
Average Earning Assets
to Average Total Assets 94.65 94.05 93.71 93.93 93.82
Allowance for Loan Losses
as % of Total Loans 1.18 1.24 1.27 1.24 1.20
Dividend Payout Ratio 39.49 39.44 37.06 37.25 38.13
Average Stockholders' Equity
to Average Assets 11.42 11.04 10.68 10.16 9.72
Tax Equivalent Yield on
Earning Assets 8.15 7.44 7.38 8.31 9.48
Cost of Supporting Liabilities 3.51 2.70 2.81 3.65 5.05
Net Interest Margin on Earning
Assets 4.64 4.74 4.57 4.66 4.43
</TABLE>
- ----------------------------
(1) Per share amounts have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to First
Merchants' October, 1995 three-for-two stock split and January, 1993 three-
for-two stock split.
Amounts include First United Bank subsequent to its acquisition on July 31,
1991.
vii
<PAGE>
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA - RANDOLPH COUNTY
The following summary sets forth selected consolidated financial
information regarding Randolph County. This information should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere within
this Proxy Statement-Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
(Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis) $ 2,816 $ 2,809 $ 2,951 $ 2,555 $ 2,555
Net Interest Income 2,654 2,598 2,674 2,671 2,321
Provision for Loan Losses 408 120 240 180 120
Net Interest Income After
Provision for Loan Losses 2,246 2,478 2,434 2,491 2,201
Total Other Income 223 242 418 221 191
Total Other Expenses 1,535 1,614 1,404 1,308 1,230
Income Before Income Tax
Expense and Change in
Accounting Method 934 1,105 1,448 1,404 1,162
Net Income 667 802 1,072 1,030 863
PER SHARE DATA (1)
Income Before Change in
Accounting Methods $ 24.20 $ 29.10 $ 37.68 $ 37.36 $ 30.96
Net Income 24.20 29.10 38.89 37.36 30.96
Cash Dividends Paid 10.00 10.00 11.50 16.00 12.00
December 31 Book Value 317.66 302.06 282.97 250.24 218.14
AVERAGE BALANCES
Total Assets $72,606 $78,771 $76,379 $70,584 $67,356
Total Loans 43,950 42,703 37,370 34,337 33,930
Total Deposits 63,331 69,206 68,406 63,481 61,021
Total Stockholders' Equity 8,642 8,178 7,402 6,494 5,647
YEAR-END BALANCES
Total Assets $73,219 $78,432 $80,626 $77,053 $70,311
Total Loans 43,494 43,778 40,351 35,351 33,345
Total Deposits 63,441 68,781 71,544 68,475 62,845
Total Stockholders' Equity 8,753 8,327 7,801 6,898 6,026
viii
<PAGE>
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Return on Average Assets .92% 1.02% 1.40% 1.46% 1.28%
Return on Average
Stockholders' Equity 7.72 9.81 14.48 15.86 15.28
Average Earning Assets
to Average Total Assets 94.39 94.73 95.74 95.54 96.19
Allowance for Loan Losses
as % of Total Loans 1.36 1.12 1.40 1.08 .99
Dividend Payout Ratio 41.32 34.37 15.86 14.28 12.87
Average Stockholders' Equity
to Average Assets 11.90 10.38 9.69 9.20 8.38
Tax Equivalent Yield on
Earning Assets 7.75 6.94 7.50 8.67 9.88
Cost of Supporting Liabilities 3.64 3.18 3.46 4.39 5.93
Net Interest Margin on Earning
Assets 4.11 3.76 4.04 4.28 3.95
</TABLE>
- ---------------------------
(1) Per share amounts have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to Randolph
County's November, 1993 three-for-one stock split.
ix
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS OF PROXY STATEMENT OF
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
------------------------------------------------------------
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
TO BE HELD ON ____________, 1996
------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL INFORMATION
This Proxy Statement-Prospectus is furnished to the shareholders of
Randolph County Bancorp ("Randolph County") in connection with the solicitation
by the Board of Directors of Randolph County of proxies for use at the Special
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on _________________, _____________ ___,
1996, at _______ o'clock __.m., local time, at the main office of The Randolph
County Bank (the "Bank"), 122 West Washington Street, Winchester, Indiana 47394.
This Proxy Statement-Prospectus is first being mailed to Randolph County
shareholders on _________ ___, 1996.
The purpose of the Special Meeting is to consider and vote upon an
Agreement of Reorganization and Merger (the "Agreement"), dated January 17,
1996, by and between First Merchants Corporation ("First Merchants") and
Randolph County. Pursuant to the Agreement, Randolph County will merge with and
into First Merchants (the "Merger") and the Bank will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of First Merchants.
Approval of the Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least a majority of the outstanding shares of Randolph County common stock is
required. Only holders of record of Randolph County common stock at the close
of business on _________ ___, 1996, the record date, are entitled to notice of,
and to vote at, the Special Meeting. Randolph County had 27,555 shares of no
par value common stock issued and outstanding on the record date, which shares
were held of record by approximately 71 shareholders. For each matter to be
voted on at the Special Meeting, each share of Randolph County common stock is
entitled to one vote.
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by Randolph County. In
addition to use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by
telephone or telegraph by directors, officers, and certain employees of Randolph
County, who will not be specially compensated for such soliciting.
The shares represented by proxies properly signed and returned will be
voted at the Special Meeting as instructed by the shareholders giving the
proxies. In the absence of specific instructions to the contrary, proxies
will be voted FOR approval of the Agreement described in this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus and in accordance with the judgment of the persons named
as proxies in the proxy with respect to any other matter which may properly
come before the Special Meeting. See "PROPOSED MERGER--Rights of Dissenting
Shareholders." Any shareholder giving a proxy has the right to revoke it at
any time before it is exercised. Therefore, execution of a proxy will not
affect a shareholder's right to vote in person if he or she attends the
Special Meeting. Revocation may be made by a later dated proxy delivered to
Randolph County; by written notice sent to the Secretary of Randolph County
Bancorp at 122 West Washington Street, Winchester, Indiana 47394; or by
personal oral or written request at the Special Meeting. To be effective,
any revocation must be received before the proxy is exercised.
<PAGE>
PROPOSED MERGER
The following summary of certain aspects of the Agreement does not purport
to be a complete description of the terms of the Agreement and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Agreement, which is attached to this
Proxy Statement-Prospectus as Appendix A and is incorporated into this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus by reference.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MERGER
Under the terms of the Agreement, Randolph County will merge with and into
First Merchants and the separate corporate existence of Randolph County will
cease. As a result, the Bank will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of First
Merchants. It is the present intention of First Merchants to continue to
operate the Bank as a subsidiary after the effective date of the Merger. The
Merger will be accounted for as a pooling of interests transaction.
As of December 31, 1995, Randolph County had consolidated assets of
approximately $73.2 million, consolidated deposits of approximately $63.4
million, consolidated shareholders' equity of approximately $8.8 million and
consolidated net income for the year then ended of approximately $667,000.
Based on the pro forma financial information included elsewhere in this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus and assuming that the Merger had been consummated on
December 31, 1995, Randolph County represented as of such date 9.4% of the
consolidated assets of First Merchants, 9.7% of consolidated deposits, 9.8%
of consolidated shareholders' equity and, for the year then ended, 6.3% of
consolidated net income. See "PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION."
BACKGROUND AND REASONS FOR THE MERGER
In recent years, there has been, and there continues to be, substantial
consolidation in the United States banking and financial services industry.
This trend is of concern to smaller institutions like Randolph County because
larger entities that emerge from consolidations may acquire substantial
competitive advantages. Additionally, developments and deregulation in the
financial services sector of the economy have led to increased competition for
commercial banks.
In response to these competitive factors and after evaluation of financial,
economic, legal, and market considerations, the Board of Directors of Randolph
County concluded that an affiliation with a larger, more diversified financial
organization would be in the best interest of Randolph County and its
shareholders, employees and customers, as well as the communities that the Bank
serves. In the opinion of the Board of Directors of Randolph County, such an
affiliation will provide the Bank with enhanced lending capabilities, additional
resources and management expertise, the potential to achieve certain economies
of scale and the opportunity to develop new or expanded products and services.
Further, Randolph County shareholders will benefit from ownership of a larger
financial institution and from ownership of common stock which is traded in the
over-the-counter market and is reported on the NASDAQ National Market System.
The terms of the Agreement were agreed upon in arm's length negotiations
conducted between the respective managements of Randolph County and First
Merchants. The factors considered by the Board of Directors of Randolph County
prior to entering into the Agreement included, but were not limited to, the
amount and form of consideration offered by First Merchants for the shares of
Randolph County common stock; the financial condition, recent results of
operations and prospects of Randolph County and First Merchants; the strength of
the management of First Merchants; the historic prices for shares of Randolph
County and First Merchants common stock; and the future prospects of Randolph
County in light of increased deregulation and competition within the financial
services industry. Further, the Board of Directors of Randolph County relied
upon the opinion of Professional Bank Services, Inc., investment bankers, that
the Merger is fair from a financial point of view to the shareholders of
Randolph County. See "PROPOSED MERGER--Opinion of
2
<PAGE>
Investment Banker" and Appendix C. All of the foregoing factors were integral
components in the determination of the consideration to be exchanged for each
share of Randolph County common stock.
Based upon the foregoing reasons, the Board of Directors of Randolph County
concluded that, at this time, it is advantageous for Randolph County to
affiliate with First Merchants. The Board of Directors, in approving and
recommending that shareholders approve the Agreement, believes that the Merger
is in the best interest of Randolph County and its shareholders, employees and
customers and the communities which the Bank serves.
OPINION OF INVESTMENT BANKER
Professional Bank Services, Inc. ("PBS") was engaged by Randolph County to
advise the Randolph County Board of Directors as to the fairness of the
consideration, from a financial perspective, to be paid by First Merchants to
Randolph County's shareholders as set forth in the Agreement. PBS is a bank
consulting firm with offices in Louisville, Nashville, Indianapolis, Washington,
D.C., and Ocala, Florida. As part of its investment banking business, PBS is
regularly engaged in reviewing the fairness of financial institution acquisition
transactions from a financial perspective and in the valuation of financial
institutions and other businesses and their securities in connection with
mergers, acquisitions, estate settlements, and other transactions. Neither PBS
nor any of its affiliates has a material financial interest in Randolph County
or First Merchants. PBS was selected to advise the Randolph County Board of
Directors based upon its familiarity with Indiana financial institutions and its
knowledge of the banking industry as a whole.
Following Randolph County's selection of PBS, First Merchants retained PBS
to provide consulting services with respect to the section of the application
filed by First Merchants with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System relating to competition. PBS will be compensated for its services on an
hourly rate basis. PBS's relationship with Randolph County was not a
consideration in First Merchants' selection of PBS. Except as described in this
section, neither First Merchants nor Randolph County have had any material or
compensable relationship with PBS, its affiliates, and/or unaffiliated
representatives during the past two years.
PBS performed certain analyses described below and discussed the range of
values for Randolph County resulting from such analyses with the Board of
Directors of Randolph County in connection with its advice as to the fairness of
the consideration to be paid by First Merchants.
A Fairness Opinion of PBS was delivered to the Board of Directors of
Randolph County on ____________, 1996 at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors. A copy of the Fairness Opinion, which includes a summary of the
assumptions made and information analyzed in deriving the Fairness Opinion, is
attached as Appendix C to this Proxy Statement-Prospectus and should be read in
its entirety.
In arriving at its Fairness Opinion, PBS reviewed certain publicly
available business and financial information relating to Randolph County and
First Merchants. PBS considered certain financial and stock market data of
Randolph County and First Merchants, compared that data with similar data for
certain other publicly-held bank holding companies which own Indiana financial
institutions, and considered the financial terms of certain other comparable
Indiana bank transactions that had recently been effected. PBS also considered
such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and
financial, economic and market criteria that it deemed relevant. In connection
with its review, PBS did not independently verify the foregoing information and
relied on such information as being complete and accurate in all material
respects. Financial forecasts prepared by PBS were based on assumptions
believed by PBS to be reasonable and to reflect currently available information.
PBS did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets of
Randolph County or First Merchants. PBS reviewed the correspondence and
3
<PAGE>
information regarding the financial institutions who had also expressed an
interest in acquiring Randolph County. PBS reviewed all offers received by
Randolph County.
As part of preparing the Fairness Opinion, PBS performed a due diligence
review of First Merchants and its affiliate banks. As part of the due diligence
review, PBS reviewed minutes of Board of Directors meetings beginning January 1,
1994 through March 20, 1996; reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by First Merchants on Forms 10-K and 10-Q for the years ending
December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996 to date; report of independent auditors for the
years ending December 31, 1994 and 1995; management letters from independent
auditors for 1994 and management's responses thereto; Uniform Bank Performance
Reports; investment security holdings; listing of pending litigation provided by
independent counsel; analysis and calculation of the Allowance for Loan and
Lease Losses as of December 31, 1995; and internally identified special assets
and related reports.
PBS also interviewed senior management of First Merchants regarding
operations, performance and the future prospects of First Merchants. PBS
compared the historical common stock market of financial institutions
headquartered in Indiana to First Merchants.
PBS reviewed and analyzed the historical performance of Randolph County
contained in Audited Financial Statements dated December 31, 1994 and 1995;
unaudited internal financial statements of Randolph County dated September 30,
1995; December 31, 1995 and June 30, 1995 Consolidated Reports of Condition and
Income filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation by the Bank;
December 31, 1994, June 30, 1995 and September 30, 1995 Uniform Bank Performance
Report of the Bank; historical common stock trading activity of Randolph County;
and the premises and other fixed assets. PBS reviewed and tabulated statistical
data regarding the loan portfolio, securities portfolio and other performance
ratios and statistics. Financial projections were prepared and analyzed as well
as other financial studies, analyses and investigations as deemed relevant for
the purpose of the Fairness Opinion. In review of the aforementioned
information, PBS took into account its assessment of general market and
financial conditions, its experience in other transactions, and its knowledge of
the banking industry generally.
In connection with rendering the Fairness Opinion and preparing its various
written and oral presentations to Randolph County's Board of Directors, PBS
performed a variety of financial analyses, including those summarized below.
The summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete description of the
analyses performed by PBS in this regard. The preparation of a fairness opinion
involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods
of financial analysis and the application of these methods to the particular
circumstances and therefore such an opinion is not readily susceptible to
summary description. Accordingly, notwithstanding the separate factors
summarized below, PBS believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole
and that selecting portions of its analyses and of the factors considered by it,
without considering all analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of
the evaluation process underlying its opinion. In performing its analyses, PBS
made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, business and
economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond Randolph
County's or First Merchants' control. The analyses performed by PBS are not
necessarily indicative of actual values or future results which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. In
addition, analyses relating to the values of businesses do not purport to be
appraisals or to reflect the process by which businesses actually may be sold.
ACQUISITION COMPARISON ANALYSIS: In performing this analysis, PBS reviewed
171 Indiana bank acquisition transactions announced since 1985. The purpose of
the analysis was to obtain an evaluation range based on these Indiana
acquisition transactions. Multiples of earnings and book values implied by the
comparable transactions were utilized in obtaining a range for the acquisition
value of Randolph County. In addition to reviewing recent Indiana bank
transactions, PBS performed separate comparable analyses for acquisitions of
Indiana banks which, like Randolph
4
<PAGE>
County, had an equity-to-asset ratio greater than 11.0%, were located in non-
metropolitan areas and those with deposits between $25.0 and $75.0 million.
Values for the 171 Indiana bank acquisitions, expressed as multiples of both
book value and earnings were 1.45 and 14.42, respectively. The median multiples
of book value and earnings for acquisitions of Indiana banks with equity-to-
asset ratios greater than 11.0% were 1.41 and 15.52, respectively. For
acquisitions of Indiana banks located in non-metropolitan areas, the median
multiples were 1.40 and 13.89, respectively. For acquisitions of Indiana banks
with deposits between $25.0 and $75.0 million, the median multiples were 1.42
and 13.12, respectively. Assuming First Merchants' common stock price is $27.25
per share and earnings continue, the value should equal $559.44 per Randolph
County common share. This represents a multiple of book value and a multiple of
earnings of 1.76 and 23.11, respectively.
ADJUSTED NET ASSET VALUE ANALYSIS: PBS reviewed Randolph County's balance
sheet data to determine the amount of material adjustments required to the
stockholder's equity of Randolph County based on differences between the market
value of Randolph County's assets and their value reflected on Randolph County's
financial statements. PBS determined that one adjustment was warranted. PBS
reflected a value of the non-interest bearing deposits of approximately
$3,212,000. The adjusted net asset value was determined to be $434.22 per share
of Randolph County's common stock.
DISCOUNTED EARNINGS ANALYSIS: A dividend discount analysis was performed
by PBS pursuant to which a range of stand-alone values of Randolph County was
determined by adding (i) the present value of estimated future dividend streams
that Randolph County could generate over a five-year period beginning in 1996
and ending in 2000, and (ii) the present value of the "terminal value" of
Randolph County's common equity at the end of 2000. The "terminal value" of
Randolph County's common equity at the end of the five-year period was
determined by applying a multiple of 1.45 times the projected terminal year's
book value. The 1.45 multiple represents the median price paid as a multiple of
book value for all Indiana bank transactions since 1985.
Dividend streams and terminal values were discounted to present values
using a discount rate of 12%. This rate reflects assumptions regarding the
required rate of return of holders or buyers of Randolph County common stock.
The value of Randolph County, determined by adding the present value of the
total cash flows, was $379.02 per Randolph County common share. In addition,
using the five-year projection as a base, a twenty-year projection was prepared
assuming that an annual growth rate of 6.00% and a consistent return on assets
of 1.00% would remain in effect for the entire period, beginning in 1998.
Dividends also were assumed to be 50% of income for all years. This long-term
projection resulted in a value of $284.37 per Randolph County share.
SPECIFIC ACQUISITION ANALYSIS: PBS valued Randolph County based on an
acquisition analysis assuming a "break-even" earnings scenario to an acquiror as
to price, current interest rates and amortization of the premium paid. Based on
this analysis, an acquiring institution would pay $414.20 per share of Randolph
County common stock, assuming they were willing to accept no impact to their net
income in the initial year. This analysis was based on a funding cost of 6.5%
adjusted for taxes, amortization of the acquisition premium over 15 years and
1995 earnings for Randolph County of $667,000.
PRO FORMA MERGER ANALYSIS: PBS compared the historical performance of
Randolph County to that of First Merchants and other regional bank holding
companies. This included, among other things, a comparison of profitability,
asset quality and capital adequacy measures. In addition, the contribution of
each of Randolph County and First Merchants to the income statement and balance
sheet of the pro forma combined company was analyzed.
The effect of the affiliation on the historical and pro forma financial
data of Randolph County, as well as the projected financial data prepared by
PBS, was analyzed. Randolph County's historical financial data was compared to
pro forma
5
<PAGE>
combined historical and projected earnings and book value per share as well as
other measures of profitability, capital adequacy and asset quality.
The Fairness Opinion is directed only to the question of whether the
consideration to be received by Randolph County's shareholders under the
Agreement is fair and equitable from a financial perspective and does not
constitute a recommendation to any Randolph County shareholder to vote in favor
of the Merger. No limitations were imposed on PBS regarding the scope of its
investigation or otherwise by Randolph County or any of its affiliates.
Based on the results of the various analyses described above, PBS concluded
that the consideration to be received by Randolph County shareholders under the
Agreement is fair and equitable from a financial perspective to the shareholders
of Randolph County.
PBS will receive a fee of $15,000 and reimbursement for all reasonable out-
of-pocket expenses from Randolph County for the service of rendering this
Fairness Opinion. In addition, Randolph County has agreed to indemnify PBS and
its directors, officers and employees from liability in connection with the
Merger, and to hold PBS harmless from any losses, actions, claims, damages,
expenses or liabilities related to any of PBS's acts or decisions made in good
faith and in the best interest of Randolph County.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY HAS CAREFULLY CONSIDERED AND
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE AGREEMENT AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS
APPROVE THE AGREEMENT.
Each member of the Randolph County Board of Directors has agreed to cause
all shares of Randolph County common stock beneficially owned by him to be voted
in favor of the Merger. As of March 31, 1996, the members of the Randolph
County Board of Directors beneficially owned 7,293 or approximately 26% of the
shares of Randolph County common stock outstanding.
EXCHANGE OF RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMON STOCK
Under the terms of the Agreement, as of the effective date of the Merger,
each outstanding share of Randolph County common stock, other than shares as to
which dissenters' rights have been exercised, will be converted into the right
to receive twenty and 53/100 (20.53) shares of First Merchants common stock.
No fractional shares of First Merchants common stock will be issued to
shareholders of Randolph County in connection with the Merger. Each shareholder
who otherwise would be entitled to a fractional interest in a First Merchants
share as a result of the exchange ratio will, upon surrender of all certificates
representing Randolph County shares of common stock, promptly receive an amount
of cash equal to the fraction of the average of the closing price of First
Merchants common stock as reported on NASDAQ in the over-the-counter market for
the five business days immediately preceding the effective date of the Merger.
After the effective date of the Merger, stock certificates previously
representing Randolph County common stock will represent only the right to
receive shares of First Merchants common stock and cash for any fractional
shares, or, in the case of dissenters, the right to receive cash. Prior to the
surrender of Randolph County stock certificates for exchange subsequent to the
effective date, the holders of such shares entitled to receive shares of First
Merchants common stock and cash for fractional shares will not be entitled to
receive payment of dividends or other distributions declared on such shares of
First Merchants common stock. Upon exchange of such certificates, however, any
accumulated dividends or other distributions
6
<PAGE>
previously declared and withheld on the shares of First Merchants common stock
will be paid, without interest. On the effective date of the Merger, the stock
transfer books of Randolph County will be closed and no transfer of shares of
Randolph County common stock will thereafter be made. If, after the effective
date, certificates representing shares of Randolph County common stock are
presented for registration or transfer, they will be cancelled and exchanged for
shares of common stock and/or cash, as applicable.
Distribution of stock certificates representing shares of First Merchants
common stock and cash payments for fractional shares will be made to each former
shareholder of Randolph County within ten days of the shareholder's delivery,
after the effective date of the Merger, of his or her certificates representing
Randolph County common stock to First Merchants Bank, which will act as
conversion agent in the Merger. Instructions as to delivery of stock
certificates will be sent to each shareholder shortly after the effective date
of the Merger.
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
The Indiana Business Corporation Law ("IBCL") provides shareholders of
merging corporations with certain dissenters' rights. The dissenters' rights of
Randolph County shareholders are set forth in Chapter 44 of the IBCL, a copy of
which is attached to this Proxy Statement-Prospectus as Appendix B.
Shareholders will not be entitled to dissenters' rights absent strict compliance
with the procedures of Indiana law.
Chapter 44 of the IBCL provides that shareholders of Randolph County have
the right to demand payment in cash for the fair value of their shares of
Randolph County common stock immediately before the Merger becomes effective,
excluding any appreciation or depreciation in value in anticipation of the
Merger, unless a court determines that such exclusion would be inequitable. To
claim this right, the shareholder must first:
(a) deliver to Randolph County before the vote is taken, written
notice of the shareholder's intent to demand payment in cash for the
shareholder's shares if the Merger is effectuated, AND
(b) not vote in favor of the Merger in person or by proxy.
Dissenting shareholders may send their written notice to Max Gordon, Chairman,
Randolph County Bancorp, 122 West Washington Street, Winchester, Indiana 47394.
If the Merger is approved by the shareholders, First Merchants or Randolph
County will send a notice of dissenters' rights to those shareholders satisfying
the above conditions within 10 days after shareholder approval has occurred.
The notice will state the procedures the dissenting shareholder thereafter must
follow to exercise dissenters' rights in accordance with Indiana law.
A Randolph County shareholder who is sent such a notice must then
(a) demand payment for the shareholder's shares of Randolph County common stock,
(b) certify whether beneficial ownership of the Randolph County shares was
acquired before the date set forth in such notice, and (c) deposit the
shareholder's certificates representing shares of Randolph County common stock
in accordance with the terms of such notice. A Randolph County shareholder who
does not demand payment or deposit the shareholder's certificates representing
shares of Randolph County common stock as required and within applicable time
periods is considered to have voted the shareholder's shares of Randolph County
common stock in favor of the Merger and is not entitled to receive payment for
the shareholder's shares under Chapter 44 of the IBCL.
A SHAREHOLDER WHO DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS DESCRIBED
ABOVE WILL BE CONSIDERED NOT TO BE ENTITLED TO RIGHTS UNDER CHAPTER 44 OF THE
IBCL. SHAREHOLDERS WHO EXECUTE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY BUT DO NOT SPECIFY
A CHOICE
7
<PAGE>
ON THE MERGER PROPOSAL WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER AND
ACCORDINGLY TO HAVE WAIVED THEIR DISSENTERS' RIGHTS, UNLESS THE SHAREHOLDER
REVOKES THE PROXY PRIOR TO ITS BEING VOTED.
Upon consummation of the Merger, First Merchants will pay each dissenting
shareholder who has complied with all statutory requirements and Randolph
County's notice, and who was the beneficial owner of Randolph County common
stock prior to November 17, 1995 (the date the Merger proposal was first
publicly announced), First Merchants' estimate of the fair value of the shares
as of the time immediately prior to the Merger, excluding any appreciation in
value in anticipation of the Merger. For those dissenters who became beneficial
owners of shares on or after November 17, 1995, First Merchants may withhold
payment of the fair value of the shares until the dissenter agrees to accept the
amount in full satisfaction of the dissenter's demand or until First Merchants
is otherwise directed by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Dissenters who comply with certain procedures can object to the fair value
established by First Merchants by stating their estimate of the fair value and
demand payment of the additional amount claimed as fair value within thirty (30)
days after First Merchants made or offered payment to the dissenter. First
Merchants can elect to agree to the dissenter's fair value demand or can
commence an action in the Randolph County Circuit or Superior Court for a
judicial determination of the fair value. The Court may appoint appraisers to
determine the fair value. The costs of the proceeding, including compensation
and expenses of the appraisers, counsel for the parties and experts, will be
assessed against all parties to the action in such amounts as the Court finds
equitable. Each dissenter made a party to the action will be entitled to
receive the amount, if any, by which the Court finds the fair value of the
dissenter's shares, plus interest, exceeds the amount paid by First Merchants.
THE FOREGOING SUMMARY OF THE RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS ADDRESSES
ALL MATERIAL FEATURES OF THE APPLICABLE INDIANA DISSENTERS' RIGHTS STATUTE BUT
DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE
STATUTORY PROVISIONS ATTACHED HERETO AS APPENDIX B.
A SHAREHOLDER'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
EXERCISING DISSENTERS' RIGHTS WILL RESULT IN A LOSS OF SUCH RIGHTS AND
SHAREHOLDERS WHO MAY WISH TO EXERCISE DISSENTERS' RIGHTS SHOULD CONSIDER SEEKING
LEGAL COUNSEL.
RESALE OF FIRST MERCHANTS COMMON STOCK BY RANDOLPH COUNTY AFFILIATES
No restrictions on the sale or transfer of the shares of First Merchants
common stock issued pursuant to the Merger will be imposed solely as a result of
the Merger, other than restrictions on the transfer of such shares issued to any
shareholder who may be deemed to be an "affiliate" of Randolph County for
purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"). Directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders are
generally deemed to be affiliates for purposes of Rule 145.
The Agreement provides that Randolph County will provide First Merchants
with a list identifying each affiliate of Randolph County. The Agreement also
requires that each Randolph County affiliate deliver to First Merchants, prior
to the effective date of the Merger, a written agreement to the effect that such
affiliate will not sell, pledge, transfer or otherwise dispose or reduce such
affiliate's market risk with respect to the First Merchants common stock to be
received by such affiliate (a) during the period 30 days prior to the effective
date, (b) until such time as financial results covering at least 30 days of
combined operations of Randolph County and First Merchants have been published
within the meaning of Section 201.01 of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Codification of Financial Reporting Policies and (c) unless done pursuant to an
effective registration statement under the Securities Act or pursuant to
Rule 145 or another exemption from the registration requirements under the
Securities Act. The certificates representing First Merchants common stock
issued to Randolph County affiliates in the Merger may contain a legend
indicating these resale restrictions.
8
<PAGE>
As this is a general statement of certain restrictions regarding the sale
or transfer of the shares of First Merchants common stock to be issued in the
Merger, those shareholders of Randolph County who may be affiliates of Randolph
County should confer with their legal counsel regarding the resale restrictions
that may apply to them.
CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION
Consummation of the Merger is conditioned upon, among other things, the
approval of the Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Randolph County as
required under Indiana law; registration of the shares of First Merchants common
stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the receipt of all state
securities and blue sky approvals and authorizations required for the offer and
sale of the shares of First Merchants common stock to Randolph County
shareholders in accordance with the Agreement; the receipt of all regulatory
approvals required for the Merger; the receipt of an opinion of counsel with
respect to certain federal income tax matters; the receipt by First Merchants of
a letter from its independent public accountants confirming its ability to
account for the Merger as a pooling of interests; and the receipt by First
Merchants of certain undertakings from affiliates of Randolph County. Further,
consummation is conditioned upon the receipt by First Merchants and Randolph
County of certain officers' certificates and legal opinions, the accuracy on the
effective date of the Merger of representations and warranties contained in the
Agreement and the fulfillment of certain covenants set forth in the Agreement.
The conditions to consummation of the transaction, which are more fully
enumerated in the Agreement, which is fully set forth as Appendix A to this
Proxy Statement-Prospectus, are requirements not subject to unilateral waiver,
and those conditions not mandated by law may be altered only by the written
consent of the parties to the Agreement. See "PROPOSED MERGER -- Resale of
First Merchants Common Stock by Randolph County Affiliates," "PROPOSED MERGER --
Regulatory Approvals" and "FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES" and also Appendix A.
TERMINATION
The Agreement may be terminated before the Merger becomes effective if
either party makes a material misrepresentation in or materially breaches the
Agreement; if consummation of the Merger is inadvisable due to the commencement
or threat of material litigation or legal proceedings against one of the
parties; if a material adverse change occurs in the consolidated financial
condition or business of First Merchants or Randolph County since September 30,
1995; if the Merger will not constitute a tax-free reorganization under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; if the Merger cannot be accounted for
as a pooling of interests; if certain information provided pursuant to the
Agreement by Randolph County to First Merchants prior to consummation of the
Merger has had or may have a material adverse effect on the financial condition
or business of Randolph County or the Bank; or if consummation of the Merger has
not occurred by September 30, 1996. Upon termination for any of these reasons,
the Agreement will be void and of no further force or effect.
RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING RANDOLPH COUNTY
The Agreement contains certain restrictions regarding the conduct of
business of Randolph County and the Bank pending consummation of the Merger.
Among other items, neither Randolph County nor the Bank may, without the prior
written consent of First Merchants, materially change its capital structure or
declare or pay any dividends or make any other distribution to its shareholders,
except for the payment by Randolph County of quarterly dividends on its shares
of common stock of $1.50 per share in April of 1996 and $1.50 per share in July
of 1996. Randolph County may not pay any such dividend with respect to the
fiscal quarter in which the Merger becomes effective and in which Randolph
County shareholders will become entitled to receive dividends on the shares of
First Merchants common stock into which the shares of
9
<PAGE>
Randolph County are to be converted. The Bank is permitted under the Agreement
to pay dividends in the ordinary course of business.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
The Merger is subject to the prior approval requirements of the Indiana
Financial Institutions Act and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.
Applications thereunder have been filed with the Indiana Department of Financial
Institutions ("Indiana Department") and with the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve"). In reviewing the Indiana Department
application, the Indiana Department considers various factors including the
managerial and financial resources of First Merchants, whether First Merchants'
subsidiaries, First Merchants Bank, First United Bank and Pendleton Banking
Company, have met, and propose to continue to meet, the credit needs of their
communities, and whether the interests of depositors, creditors, and the public
generally are jeopardized by the transaction. In reviewing the Federal Reserve
application, the Federal Reserve takes into consideration various factors
including the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of First
Merchants and its subsidiaries, as well as the competitive effects of the
acquisition and the convenience and needs of the community served by the Bank.
The Federal Reserve may not approve a transaction if it finds that the effect of
the transaction substantially lessens competition, tends to create a monopoly or
results in a restraint of trade, unless the Federal Reserve finds that the
anti-competitive effects of the proposed transaction are outweighed by the
public interest and the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the
convenience and needs of the communities to be served.
After approval of the Federal Reserve is received, the Merger cannot be
consummated for 30 days, the first 20 days of which the United States Department
of Justice has the authority to challenge the Merger on antitrust grounds.
The approvals of the Indiana Department and the Federal Reserve are not to
be interpreted as the opinion of those regulatory authorities that the Merger is
favorable to the shareholders of Randolph County from a financial point of view
or that those regulatory authorities have considered the adequacy of the terms
of the Merger. The approvals in no way constitute an endorsement or a
recommendation of the Merger by the Indiana Department or the Federal Reserve.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE MERGER
The Merger will become effective in the month in which the last required
approval to consummate the Merger is received or, if later, in which any
applicable waiting period following an approval expires. First Merchants and
Randolph County currently anticipate that the effective date of the Merger will
occur during the ________________ quarter of 1996.
MANAGEMENT AFTER THE MERGER
First Merchants will be the surviving corporation in the Merger and
Randolph County's separate corporate existence will cease. Accordingly, the
directors and officers of Randolph County will no longer serve in such
capacities after the effective date of the Merger.
The officers and directors of the Bank immediately prior to the Merger will
continue to be the officers and directors of the Bank following the Merger
subject to the provisions of the Bank's Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws.
In accordance with the Agreement and in connection with the first annual
meeting of the shareholders of First Merchants after the Merger, First Merchants
shall cause all necessary corporate action to be taken to cause the current
Chairman of the Board of the Bank, Michael Wickersham, to be nominated for
election as a member of First Merchants' Board of Directors for a three (3)-year
term.
10
<PAGE>
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following discussion summarizes certain federal income tax aspects of
the Merger. The discussion does not purport to cover all federal income tax
consequences relating to the Merger and does not contain any information with
respect to state, local or other tax laws.
Assuming that (i) the Merger of Randolph County with and into First
Merchants qualifies as a statutory merger under state law; (ii) the Merger
constitutes a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 (a)(1)(A) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); (iii) after the
transaction, First Merchants, as successor of Randolph County, will hold
substantially all of its assets; and (iv) in the transaction, the Randolph
County shareholders will exchange an amount of stock constituting control of
Randolph County for First Merchants common stock; the following is a summary of
the federal income tax consequences which will result:
(1) No gain or loss will be recognized by Randolph County shareholders who
exchange all of their Randolph County common stock for First Merchants
common stock pursuant to the Merger, except to the extent of any cash
received in lieu of receipt of a fractional share of First Merchants
common stock.
(2) The basis of the First Merchants common stock received (including any
fractional share interests deemed received) by Randolph County
shareholders who exchange all of their Randolph County common stock
for First Merchants common stock will be the same as the basis of the
Randolph County common stock surrendered in exchange therefor.
(3) The holding period of the First Merchants common stock received
(including any fractional share interests deemed received) by Randolph
County shareholders who exchange all of their Randolph County common
stock for First Merchants common stock will include the period during
which the Randolph County common stock was held, provided the Randolph
County common stock was held as a capital asset on the date of the
exchange.
(4) Where a cash payment is received by a Randolph County shareholder in
lieu of fractional shares of First Merchants common stock, the cash
payment will be treated as a distribution in redemption of the
fractional share interest by First Merchants, subject to the
provisions and limitations of Section 302 of the Code. Where such
exchange qualifies under Section 302(a) of the Code, such shareholder
will recognize a capital gain or loss provided that the Randolph
County common stock was held as a capital asset on the date of the
Merger.
(5) Any Randolph County shareholder who perfects dissenter's rights and
receives solely cash in exchange for such shareholder's Randolph
County common stock shall be treated as having received such cash as a
distribution in redemption of the Randolph County common stock subject
to the provisions and limitations of Section 302 of the Code. Where,
as a result of such distribution, such Randolph County shareholder
owns no First Merchants common stock, either directly or through the
application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318(a) of
the Code, the redemption will be a complete termination of interest
within the meaning of Section 302(b)(3) of the Code and the cash will
be treated as a distribution in full payment and exchange for Randolph
County common stock as provided in Section 302(a) of the Code. Gain
or loss will be realized and recognized to such Randolph County
shareholder in an amount equal to the difference between the
redemption price and the adjusted basis of the Randolph County common
stock surrendered in exchange therefor.
11
<PAGE>
(6) No gain or loss will be recognized by Randolph County or First
Merchants in connection with the transaction.
(7) The basis of the assets of Randolph County acquired by First Merchants
in the Merger will be the same as the basis of such assets in the
hands of Randolph County immediately prior to the Merger.
Receipt of an opinion of tax counsel (the "Tax Opinion") with respect to
the above is a condition precedent to consummation of the Merger. The Tax
Opinion will be based upon representations made by the managements of First
Merchants and Randolph County.
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX DISCUSSION SET FORTH ABOVE IS BASED UPON THE CODE,
TREASURY REGULATIONS, CASE LAW AND INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE RULINGS AS IN EFFECT
ON THE DATE HEREOF WITHOUT CONSIDERATION OF THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF ANY
PARTICULAR SITUATION OF ANY RANDOLPH COUNTY SHAREHOLDER. THIS DISCUSSION
ASSUMES THAT RANDOLPH COUNTY SHAREHOLDERS HOLD THEIR RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMON
STOCK AS CAPITAL ASSETS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 1221 OF THE CODE. SPECIAL
TAX CONSIDERATIONS NOT DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY BE APPLICABLE TO PARTICULAR CLASSES
OF TAXPAYERS, SUCH AS BROKER-DEALERS, OR TO ANY SHAREHOLDER WHO ACQUIRED
RANDOLPH COUNTY COMMON STOCK THROUGH THE EXERCISE OF ANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION
OR OTHERWISE AS COMPENSATION. EACH SHAREHOLDER SHOULD CONSULT WITH HIS OR HER
OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO
HIM OR HER, INCLUDING THE APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
NATURE OF TRADING MARKET
Shares of First Merchants common stock are traded in the over-the-counter
market and share prices are reported by the NASDAQ National Market System under
the symbol FRME. On November 16, 1995, the business day immediately preceding
the public announcement of the Merger, the closing price of First Merchants
common stock reported by the NASDAQ National Market System was $26.00 per share.
On _________ ___, 1996, the closing price of First Merchants common stock
reported by the NASDAQ National Market System was $_______ per share. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing
prices per share of First Merchants common stock as reported by the NASDAQ
National Market System. Prices reflect inter-dealer prices without retail
mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
All prices have been adjusted to give effect to stock dividends and stock
splits.
12
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 HIGH LOW
---- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C>
First Quarter $20.33 $19.00
Second Quarter 19.67 18.67
Third Quarter 22.50 19.00
Fourth Quarter 22.33 20.33
1995
----
First Quarter 22.17 20.83
Second Quarter 23.50 21.33
Third Quarter 26.50 22.67
Fourth Quarter 26.75 25.75
1996
----
First Quarter 27.50 25.00
Second Quarter
(through ______ ___, 1996)
</TABLE>
There is no established public trading market for shares of Randolph County
common stock. Most trades are isolated and occur after private negotiations,
with the result that management of Randolph County is not directly informed of
trades or prices. The best information available to Randolph County management
indicates that in 1994, 1995 and 1996, the following number of shares of
Randolph County common stock were traded in the number of transactions and for
prices to be within the ranges set forth below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Sales Price
Shares Number of -----------
Year Traded Transactions High Low
---- ------ ------------ ---- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1994 57 1 $300.00 $300.00
1995 62 2 320.00 312.00
1996
(through _________ ___, 1996) 0 0 ---- ----
</TABLE>
Management of Randolph County has not verified the accuracy of the
above prices. Further, the prices may not be a reliable indicator of the price
at which more than a limited number of shares of Randolph County common stock
would trade and there may have been additional shares of Randolph County common
stock traded at higher or lower prices of which Randolph County management is
unaware. The last trade of Randolph County common stock, of which Randolph
County management is aware, occurred on or about November 14, 1995 and involved
the sale of 12 shares at a price which, to the best of Randolph County
management's knowledge, was approximately $320.00 per share.
As of March 31, 1996, there were approximately 1,127 holders of First
Merchants common stock and approximately 71 holders of Randolph County common
stock, not including individual participants in security position listings.
13
<PAGE>
DIVIDENDS
The following table sets forth the per share cash dividends declared on
shares of First Merchants common stock and Randolph County common stock since
January 1, 1994. All dividends have been adjusted to give effect to stock
dividends and stock splits.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
First Merchants Randolph County
1994 Common Stock (1) Common Stock
---- ---------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
First Quarter $0.17 $0.00
Second Quarter 0.17 3.00
Third Quarter 0.19 0.00
Fourth Quarter 0.19 7.00
1995
----
First Quarter 0.19 0.00
Second Quarter 0.19 3.00
Third Quarter 0.20 0.00
Fourth Quarter 0.20 7.00
1996
----
First Quarter 0.20 0.00
Second Quarter 1.50
(through _______ __, 1996)
</TABLE>
(1) There can be no assurance as to the amount of future dividends that may be
declared or paid on shares of First Merchants common stock since dividend
policies are subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors of First
Merchants, general business conditions and dividends paid to First
Merchants by its affiliate banks. For certain restrictions on the payment
of dividends on shares of First Merchants common stock, see "COMPARISON OF
COMMON STOCK--Dividend Rights."
(2) During 1994 and 1995, Randolph County has declared and paid dividends on a
semiannual basis. In accordance with the Agreement, Randolph County is
permitted to pay dividends on its common stock of $1.50 per share in April,
1996 and $1.50 in July, 1996, provided that Randolph County may not pay any
such dividend during the fiscal quarter in which the Merger becomes
effective and in which Randolph County shareholders become entitled to
receive dividends on the shares of First Merchants common stock into which
their shares of Randolph County common stock are to be converted.
EXISTING AND PRO FORMA PER SHARE INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain historical, pro forma and equivalent
per share information, giving effect to the Merger and to the pending merger
with Union National Bancorp ("Union National"). The data is based on historical
financial statements and the pro forma financial information included herein.
14
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As Reported
-----------
First Merchants Book Value At
- --------------- Net Income (5) Cash Dividends Period End
-------------- -------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended December 31,
1995 $1.95 $0.77 $15.92
1994 1.80 0.71 14.07
1993 1.65 0.63 13.53
Randolph County
- ---------------
Year Ended December 31,
1995 24.20 10.00 317.66
1994 29.10 10.00 302.06
1993 37.68 11.50 282.97
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Income (5)
--------------
FIRST RANDOLPH FIRST RANDOLPH
MERCHANTS COUNTY MERCHANTS COUNTY
Pro Forma (1) Equivalent (1) Pro Forma (2) Equivalent (2)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended
December 31
1995 $1.87 $38.39 $1.84 $37.78
1994 1.76 36.13 1.72 35.31
1993 1.67 34.29 1.64 33.67
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cash Dividends
--------------
FIRST RANDOLPH FIRST RANDOLPH
MERCHANTS COUNTY MERCHANTS COUNTY
Pro Forma (1) Equivalent (1) Pro Forma (2) Equivalent (2)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended
December 31
1995 $.77 $15.81 $.77 $15.81
1994 .71 14.58 .71 14.58
1993 .63 12.93 .63 12.93
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Book Value
----------
FIRST RANDOLPH FIRST RANDOLPH
MERCHANTS COUNTY MERCHANTS COUNTY
Pro Forma (1) Equivalent (1) Pro Forma (2) Equivalent (2)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
As of December
31, 1995 $15.88 $326.02 $16.00 $328.48
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Market Value of Common Stock
----------------------------
FIRST RANDOLPH RANDOLPH
MERCHANTS COUNTY COUNTY
Historical (4) Equivalent
<S> <C> <C> <C>
November 16, 1995 (3) $26.00 $317.66 $533.78
</TABLE>
(1) Considers the pending merger with Randolph County. See "PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION."
(2) Considers the pending merger with Randolph County, as well as the
pending merger with Union National. See "PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION."
(3) Represents the last business day prior to the public announcement of
the proposed merger with Randolph County.
(4) Based upon the per share book value of Randolph County common stock as
of December 31, 1995.
(5) Net income excludes the cumulative effect of change in accounting for
income taxes.
16
<PAGE>
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance sheet as of
December 31, 1995, and the pro forma combined condensed statements of income for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, give effect
to the Merger based on the historical consolidated financial statements of First
Merchants and its subsidiaries and the historical consolidated financial
statements of Randolph County and its subsidiary under the assumptions and
adjustments set forth in the accompanying notes to the pro forma financial
statements.
The pro forma financial statements have been prepared by the managements of
First Merchants and Randolph County based upon their respective financial
statements. These pro forma statements, which include results of operations as
if the Merger had been consummated at the beginning of each period presented,
may not be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the
Merger had been in effect on the dates indicated or which may be obtained in the
future. The pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the historical consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of First
Merchants and Randolph County incorporated by reference herein.
The following pro forma combined condensed balance sheet and condensed
statements of income include:
(a) First Merchant's historical consolidated financial information.
(b) Randolph County's historical consolidated financial information.
(c) The combined statements of First Merchants and Randolph County, which
have been designated herein as "First Merchants/Randolph County Pro
Forma Combined."
(d) Union National's historical consolidated financial information, which
has been designated herein as "Union National." First Merchants has
entered into a definitive agreement, dated January 24, 1996 to
acquire, for shares of First Merchants common stock, all of the
issued and outstanding common stock of Union National. The proposed
transaction would be accounted for as a pooling of interests;
accordingly, historical financial data for Union National is included
for all periods presented. There can be no assurance at this stage
of the process that the transaction will be completed. See
"DESCRIPTION OF FIRST MERCHANTS --Acquisition Policy and Pending
Transactions."
(e) The combined statements of First Merchants, Randolph County and Union
National which have been designated herein as "Pro Forma Combined."
17
<PAGE>
PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1995
(Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(1) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Pro Forma First Merchants Pro Forma
Adjustments Randolph County/ Adjustments
First Randolph Increase Pro Forma Union Increase Pro Forma
Merchants County (Decrease) Combined National (Decrease) Combined
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash and due from banks $ 31,432 $ 4,080 $ 35,512 $ 3,461 $ 38,973
Federal funds sold 37,500 1,400 38,900 38,900
Interest-bearing deposits 155 104 259 259
Investment securities:
Available for sale 143,120 22,029 165,149 60,789 225,938
Held to maturity 58,214 58,214 2,464 60,678
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total investment securities 201,334 22,029 223,363 63,253 286,616
Mortgage loans held for sale
736 736 736
Loans 418,994 43,494 462,488 89,850 552,338
Allowance for loan losses ( 4,957) ( 594) ( 5,551) ( 1,144) ( 6,695)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loans 414,037 42,900 456,937 88,706 545,643
Premises and equipment 10,476 1,331 11,807 3,207 14,834
Goodwill 1,845 1,845 1,845
Other assets 10,344 1,375 11,719 2,631 14,350
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets $ 707,859 $ 73,219 $ 781,078 $161,078 $ 942,156
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liabilities:
Deposits $ 588,156 63,441 $ 651,597 $132,339 $ 783,936
Repurchase agreements 27,293 27,293 1,594 28,887
Other short-term borrowings 6,682 6,682 1,808 8,490
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 1,000 1,000 8,000 9,000
Other liabilities 4,255 1,025 5,280 1,596 6,876
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities 627,386 64,466 691,852 145,337 $ 837,189
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock 632 2,756 ( 2,686)(1) 702 970 ( 852) (2) 820
Additional paid - in capital 15,852 709 2,686 (1) 19,247 1,957 852 (2) 22,056
Retained earnings 62,836 5,250 68,086 12,119 80,205
Net unrealized gain on
securities available for sale 1,153 38 1,191 695 1,886
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Stockholders' Equity 80,473 8,753 89,226 15,741 104,967
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders' Equity $707,859 $ 73,219 $ 781,078 $161,078 $ 942,156
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See notes to pro forma consolidated balance sheet
18
<PAGE>
NOTES TO PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
The following pro forma adjustments are necessary to record the Merger and
pending merger.
[1] To reflect exchange of shares of Randolph County common stock for shares of
First Merchants common stock, retaining the historical cost basis of
assets, liabilities and equity through the treatment as a pooling of
interest. A total of 565,704 shares of First Merchants common stock will
be issued at the exchange ratio of 20.53 shares of First Merchants common
stock for each of the 27,555 issued and outstanding shares of Randolph
County common stock as of December 31, 1995, resulting in a transfer from
common stock to additional paid-in capital of $2,686,000 to reflect the
decrease in the aggregate par value of the issued and outstanding shares of
First Merchants common stock relative to the aggregate par value of the
currently outstanding shares of Randolph County common stock.
Common stock $ (2,686)
Additional paid-in capital $ 2,686
[2] To reflect exchange of shares of Union National common stock for shares of
First Merchants common stock, retaining the historical cost basis of
assets, liabilities and equity through the treatment as a pooling of
interest. A total of 942,685 shares of First Merchants common stock will
be issued at the exchange ratio of 4.86 shares of First Merchants common
stock for each of the 193,968 issued and outstanding shares of Union
National common stock as of December 31, 1995, resulting in a transfer from
common stock to additional paid-in capital of $852,000 to reflect the
decrease in the aggregate par value of the issued and outstanding shares
of First Merchants common stock relative to the aggregate par value of the
currently outstanding shares of Union National common stock.
Common stock $ (852)
Additional paid-in capital $ 852
19
<PAGE>
PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 1995
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
First
Merchants/
Pro Forma Randolph Pro Forma
Adjustments County Adjustments
First Randolph Increase Pro Forma Union Increase Pro Forma
Merchants County (Decrease) Combined National (Decrease) Combined
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income $ 49,964 $ 5,152 $ 55,116 $ 11,332 $ 66,448
Interest expense 22,083 2,498 24,501 6,770 31,351
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income 27,881 2,654 30,535 4,562 35,097
Provision for loan losses 640 408 1,048 340 1,388
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses 27,881 2,246 29,487 4,222 33,709
Total other income 6,907 223 7,130 463 7,593
Total other expenses 18,842 1,535 20,377 2,617 22,994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes 15,306 934 16,240 2,068 18,308
Income taxes 5,448 267 5,715 545 6,260
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 9,858 $ 667 $ 10,525 $ 1,523 $ 12,048
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income per common share $ 1.95 $ 1.87 $ 1.84
Average Shares Outstanding $5,055,169 $5,621,078 $6,564,214
</TABLE>
20
<PAGE>
PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 1994
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Pro Forma First Pro Forma
Adjustments Merchants/ Adjustments
First Randolph Increase Randolph Union Increase Pro Forma
Merchants County (Decrease) County National (Decrease) Combined
Pro Forma
Combined
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income $ 43,114 $ 4,968 $ 48,082 $ 9,684 $ 57,766
Interest expense 16,131 2,370 18,501 5,327 23,828
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income 26,963 2,598 29,581 4,357 33,938
Provision for loan losses 762 120 902 300 1,202
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses 26,201 2,476 28,679 4,057 32,736
Total other income 6,298 241 6,539 379 6,918
Total other expenses 18,434 1,614 20,048 2,584 22,632
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes 14,065 1,105 15,170 1,852 17,022
Income taxes 4,907 303 5,210 449 5,659
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 9,158 $ 802 $ 9,960 $ 1,403 $ 11,363
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income per common share $ 1.80 $ 1.76 $ 1.72
Average Shares Outstanding 5,077,307 5,643,257 6,587,564
</TABLE>
21
<PAGE>
PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 1993
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Pro Forma First Merchants/ Pro Forma
Adjustments Randolph County Adjustments
First Randolph Increase Pro Forma Union Increase Pro Forma
Merchants County (Decrease) Combined National (Decrease) Combined
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income $ 42,006 $ 5,210 $ 47,216 $ 9,365 $ 56,581
Interest expense 16,498 2,536 19,034 5,022 24,056
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income 25,508 2,674 28,182 4,343 32,525
Provision for loan losses 1,014 240 1,254 400 1,654
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses 24,494 2,434 26,928 3,943 30,871
Total other income 6,589 418 7,007 343 7,350
Total other expenses 18,215 1,403 19,618 2,490 22,108
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes 12,868 1,449 14,317 1,796 16,113
Income taxes 4,396 410 4,806 444 5,250
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income(1) $ 8,472 $ 1,039 $ 9,511 $ 1,352 $ 10,863
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income per common share $ 1.65 $ 1.67 $ 1.64
Average Shares Outstanding 5,124,626 5,690,576 6,634,145
</TABLE>
(1) Net income excludes the cumulative effect of change in accounting for
income taxes.
22
<PAGE>
SUMMARY OF PRO FORMA COMBINED SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest Income $ 66,448 $ 57,766 $ 56,581
Interest Expense 31,351 23,828 24,056
Net Interest Income 35,097 33,938 32,525
Provision for Loan Losses 1,388 1,202 1,654
Net Interest Income After
Provision for Loan Losses 33,709 32,736 30,871
Total Other Income 7,593 6,918 7,350
Total Other Expenses 22,994 22,632 22,108
Net Income (2) 12,048 11,363 10,863
PER SHARE DATA (3)
Net Income (2) 1.84 1.72 1.64
Cash Dividends Paid .77 .71 .63
December 31 Book Value 16.00 12.68 12.14
YEAR-END BALANCES
Total Assets 942,156 868,153 842,681
Total Loans 553,074 528,641 495,703
Total Deposits 783,936 720,009 688,644
Total Federal Home Loan Bank
Advances 9,000 8,000 6,000
Total Stockholders' Equity 104,967 92,754 89,257
</TABLE>
23
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993
------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Return on Average Assets 1.35% 1.33% 1.30%
Return on Average
Stockholders' Equity 12.17 12.42 12.59
Average Earning Assets to
Average Total Assets 94.86 94.46 94.27
Allowance for Loan Losses
as % of Total Loans 1.21 1.25 1.30
Average Stockholders'
Equity to Average Assets 11.11 10.72 10.36
Tax Equivalent Yield on
Earning Assets 8.09 7.41 7.46
Cost of Supporting Liabilities 3.71 2.95 3.06
Net Interest Margin on Earning
Assets 4.38 4.46 4.40
</TABLE>
(1) The pro forma information set forth in this table gives effect to one
additional separate transaction, the acquisition of Union National, that is
presently pending and which is expected to be accounted for under the
pooling of interest method (see "DESCRIPTION OF FIRST MERCHANTS --
Acquisition Policy and Pending Transactions.")
(2) Net income excludes the cumulative effect of the change in accounting for
income taxes.
(3) Per share amounts have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to First
Merchants' three-for-two stock splits on October, 1995 and January, 1993.
24
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF FIRST MERCHANTS
BUSINESS
First Merchants was incorporated under Indiana law on September 20, 1982 as
the bank holding company for First Merchants Bank, a national banking
association incorporated on February 6, 1893. On November 30, 1988, First
Merchants acquired Pendleton Banking Company ("Pendleton"), a state chartered
commercial bank organized in 1872. On July 31, 1991, First Merchants acquired
First United Bank ("First United"), a state charted commercial bank organized in
1882.
First Merchants is headquartered in Muncie, Indiana and is presently
conducting commercial banking business through the 21 offices of its three bank
subsidiaries. These commercial banking activities include accepting demand,
savings and time deposits; making agricultural, commercial, industrial, consumer
and real estate loans; installment credit lending; collections; safe deposit
operations; performing fiduciary and trust services; and providing other
services relating to the general banking business.
First Merchants bank subsidiaries make and service both secured and
unsecured loans to individuals, firms and corporations. Their installment loan
departments make direct loans to individuals and purchase installment
obligations from retailers without recourse. In addition, First Merchants'
subsidiaries make a variety of residential, industrial, commercial and
agricultural loans.
ACQUISITION POLICY AND PENDING TRANSACTIONS
First Merchants anticipates that it will continue its policy of geographic
expansion through consideration of acquisitions of additional financial
institutions. Management of First Merchants periodically engages in reviewing
and analyzing potential acquisitions. As of the date of this Proxy Statement-
Prospectus, First Merchants is a party to a definitive agreement to merge with
Union National and thereby acquire its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Union County
National Bank of Liberty. Union National's principal executive offices are
located in Liberty, Indiana.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE
Additional information concerning First Merchants is included in the First
Merchants' documents incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement-
Prospectus. See "AVAILABLE INFORMATION" and "INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS
BY REFERENCE."
25
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY
BUSINESS
Randolph County is an Indiana corporation which was incorporated in 1984
and which is a registered bank holding company owning all of the issued and
outstanding common stock of the Bank. Randolph County's principal office is
located in Winchester, Indiana and its business consists primarily of the
ownership, supervision and control of the Bank. The common stock of the Bank is
Randolph County's principal asset and dividends paid by the Bank are Randolph
County's principal source of income.
The Bank is an Indiana-chartered bank which was originally organized in
1865 and which has been in continuous operation since that date. The Bank
provides various commercial and consumer banking services to the Winchester,
Indiana community and surrounding area. These services include accepting
demand, savings and time deposits; making commercial, consumer and real estate
loans; administering trusts and estates; and providing other services relating
to the general banking business, such as, for example, safe deposit facilities.
PROPERTIES
Randolph County owns no real or personal property of a material nature.
The main office of Randolph County and the Bank is located at 122 West
Washington Street, Winchester, Indiana. Such office is owned by the Bank and is
not subject to any significant encumbrances.
LITIGATION
There is no pending litigation of a material nature in which Randolph
County or the Bank is a party or in which any of their respective property is
subject, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the normal
business of Randolph County or the Bank. Further, except as set forth below,
there is no material legal proceeding in which any director, executive officer,
principal shareholder or associate of any such director, executive officer,
principal shareholder or affiliate is a party or has a material interest adverse
to Randolph County or the Bank. None of the ordinary routine litigation in
which Randolph County or the Bank is involved is expected to have a material
adverse impact upon the financial condition or results of operation of Randolph
County or the Bank.
Stanley R. Hendrickson is the President and a director of Randolph County
and the Bank. On July 15, 1993, in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Indiana, Mr. Hendrickson plead guilty under a March 24,
1993 indictment and was found guilty of knowingly failing to make a return to
the Internal Revenue Service regarding receipt of cash in amounts in excess of
$10,000 as required by 26 U.S.C. Section 6050I, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Section 7203. As a result of the foregoing, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation ("FDIC") filed on April 25, 1994 a Notice of Intention to Remove
From Office and to Prohibit From Further Participation against Mr. Hendrickson
(Cause No. FDIC-94-28e). The proceeding was instituted to determine whether an
appropriate order should be issued against Mr. Hendrickson removing him as an
officer, director and/or institution-affiliated party of the Bank and
prohibiting him from further participation in the conduct of the affairs of the
Bank and any other insured depository institution without the prior written
approval of the FDIC and such other appropriate federal financial institutions
regulatory agency. The proceeding was dismissed by the FDIC on March 22, 1996.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 1996, the Bank had 26 full-time equivalent employees to
whom it provides a variety of benefits. Management of the Bank considers its
relations with its employees to be good. As of the same date, Randolph County
had 2 employees, both of whom are executive officers of both Randolph County
and the Bank and neither of whom is separately compensated by Randolph County
for his services to Randolph County.
MANAGEMENT
The following table contains certain information about each director and
executive officer of Randolph County as of the date of this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus:
26
<PAGE>
DIRECTORS:
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION FOR SERVED AS DIRECTOR
NAME AGE THE LAST FIVE YEARS CONTINUOUSLY SINCE (1)
- ---- --- ------------------- ----------------------
James S. Fitzmaurice 78 Retired Businessman 1984 (1975)
Max Gordon 78 Retired Farmer 1984 (1973)
Stanley R. Hendrickson 57 President of Randolph 1992 (1992)
County and Bank since
1992. Prior thereto,
Comptroller of Silver
Towne, Inc.
Richard K. Peterson 68 Retired Banker 1993 (1993)(2)
William H. Ward 65 Associate of Matchett & 1993 (1993)
Ward Insurance Agency
Michael D. Wickersham 43 President & Director of 1988 (1988)
Wick's Pies, Inc.
(1) Years in parenthesis relate to service as a director of the Bank. All of
Randolph County's directors are also directors of the Bank.
(2) Mr. Peterson also served as a director of the Bank from 1960 through 1992
and Randolph County from 1984 through 1992.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:
NAME AGE OFFICE AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
- ---- --- ------------------------------
Max Gordon 78 Chairman of the Board of Randolph
County, Vice President of Bank and
Retired Farmer
Stanley R. Hendrickson 57 President of Randolph County and Bank
since 1993 and Comptroller of Silver
Towne, Inc. prior to that time
Alvin P. Peters 53 Vice President and Cashier of Bank
Brian A. Edwards 44 Vice President of Bank
Douglas E. Fields 50 Vice President-Mortgage Loans of Bank
Linda D. Brown 45 Vice President and Trust Officer of Bank
Rick D. Tudor 37 Vice President - Installment Loans of
Bank
All of Randolph County's directors and executive officers hold office for a
term of one year or until their respective successors are duly elected and
qualified. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the
directors or executive officers and any other persons according to which any of
Randolph County's or the Bank's directors or executive officers have been
selected for their respective positions.
In accordance with the Agreement and in connection with the first annual
meeting of the shareholders of First Merchants after the Merger, First Merchants
shall cause all necessary corporate action to be taken to cause the current
Chairman
27
<PAGE>
of the Board of Bank, Michael D. Wickersham, to be nominated for election as a
member of First Merchants Board of Directors for a three-year term. See
"PROPOSED MERGER -- Management After the Merger" and "DESCRIPTION OF FIRST
MERCHANTS -- Management."
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following is a summary of the amount and percent of Randolph County's
common stock beneficially owned on March 31, 1996 by each beneficial owner of
more than five percent of Randolph County's common stock, by each director of
Randolph County, by each executive officer of Randolph County, and by all
directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted, the
beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power.
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP (1) PERCENT OF CLASS
- ---------------- ------------------------ ----------------
James S. Fitzmaurice 228(2) *
Max Gordon 285(3) 1.03%
Stanley R. Hendrickson 330(4) 1.20%
Richard K. Peterson 600 2.18%
William H. Ward 5,820(5) 21.12%
Michael D. Wickersham 30 *
Linda D. Brown 100 *
Brian A. Edwards 173 *
Douglas E. Fields 20 *
Alvin P. Peters 40 *
Richard D. Tudor 5(6) *
Juanita I. Chenowith 3,000 10.89%
R.R. #4
Union City, Indiana
Edward G. Dunn 1,650 5.99%
7701 Spring Mill Road
Indianapolis, Indiana
MCCRAB & Co, Nations Bank 1,920 6.97%
Box 832246
Dallas, Texas
Trussal & Co., NBD Bank, N.A. 2,350 8.53%
Box 77975
Detroit, Michigan 48277
Estate of Robert M. Ward, Deceased 5,760 20.90%
c/o William H. Ward,
Personal Representative
251 E. South
Winchester, Indiana
28
<PAGE>
AMOUNT AND NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP (1) PERCENT OF CLASS
- ---------------- ------------------------ ----------------
Directors and Executive 7,631 27.69%
Officers as a Group
(11 Individuals)
(1) The information contained in this column is based upon information
furnished to Randolph County by the persons and entities named above and
shareholder records of Randolph County.
(2) Includes 218 shares held jointly with his spouse, Mary Fitzmaurice.
(3) Includes 105 shares held by his spouse, Eva Marie Gordon, in which he
disclaims any beneficial interest.
(4) Includes 200 shares held jointly with his spouse, Gretchen Hendrickson.
(5) Includes 5760 shares held in the estate of Robert M. Ward, deceased, in
which William H. Ward is personal representative.
(6) Includes 5 shares held jointly with his spouse, Kimberly Tudor.
* Percentage beneficially owned is less than 1% of the outstanding shares.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Certain directors and executive officers of Randolph County and the Bank
and their associates are customers of and have had transactions with Randolph
County or the Bank from time to time in the ordinary course of business.
Similar transactions may be expected to take place in the ordinary course of
business in the future. All loans included in such transactions were made on
substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and do not
involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable
features.
RANDOLPH COUNTY MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis reviews the consolidated operating
results and financial condition of Randolph County and its subsidiary, the Bank.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements, notes thereto and other financial information presented herein.
OVERVIEW AND PER SHARE INCOME
Net income for 1995 was $667,000, or 16.8% less than the $802,000 earned in
1994, which had decreased from 1993 net income of $1,072,000 by 25.2%. Net
income per share was $24.20 for 1995, a decrease of 16.8%, compared to $29.10
for 1994, which had decreased from $38.89, or 25.2% from 1993. The primary
reason for the decrease in net income in 1995 compared to 1994 was the increase
in the provision for loan losses to $408,000 in 1995 from $120,000 in 1994. Net
income in 1994 decreased compared to 1993 due to a decline in the net interest
margin and a $220,000 gain in 1993 on an investment security which was written
down in 1992.
29
<PAGE>
Return on average assets was .92% in 1995 compared with 1.02% in 1994 and
1.40% in 1993. Return on average stockholders' equity was 7.72%, 9.81% and
14.48% for 1995, 1994 and 1993.
ANALYSIS OF INCOME STATEMENT
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is Randolph County's largest component of income and
represents the difference between interest and fees earned on loans, investments
and other earning assets and the interest paid on interest bearing liabilities.
The net interest margin is a percent computed by dividing net interest income on
a fully taxable equivalent basis by average earning assets and represents a
measure of basic earnings on interest bearing assets held by Randolph County.
The net interest margin was 4.1% in 1995 compared to 3.8% in 1994 and 4.0% in
1993.
NET INTEREST INCOME AND NET INTEREST MARGIN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994 1993
---------------------------------------------------------
Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate
---------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total interest income $5,314 7.8% $5,180 6.9% $5,487 7.3%
Total interest expense 2,498 3.6 2,371 3.1 2,536 3.5
---------------------------------------------------------
Net interest $2,816 4.1% $2,809 3.8% $2,951 4.0%
income/margin
---------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Note: Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
Net interest income of $2,816,000 in 1995 increased over the $2,809,000
recorded in 1994. In 1994, net interest income decreased slightly from the
$2,951,000 recorded in 1993. The amount of net interest income is affected by
changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities, and the interest rates on these assets and liabilities. An
analysis of how volume and rate changes have affected net interest income since
1993 is presented below.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 over 1994 1994 over 1993
------------------------------------------------------------
Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total
------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest earning assets $(416) $ 303 $(113) $(166) $(241) $(407)
Interest bearing
liabilities (207) 334 127 49 214 (165)
------------------------------------------------------------
Change in net interest
income $(209) $( 31) $(240) $(215) $( 27) $(242)
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Note: Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
Average earning assets, comprised of loans, investment securities and other
earning assets decreased 8.2% in 1995 while average interest bearing liabilities
decreased 10.5%. Net interest margin increased to 4.1% for 1995 compared to
3.8% for 1994. As the above analysis indicates, decreased volume was the
primary reason net
30
<PAGE>
interest income increased in 1995. In addition, the decrease in margins during
1994 adversely affected net interest income in 1994.
Average earning assets increased 2.0% in 1994 while interest bearing
liabilities increased 1.3%. Net interest margin decreased to 3.6% for 1994 from
3.8% for 1993. The decrease in net interest margin over the two-year period was
primarily due to competitive factors and low rate car loan promotions.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses represents a charge against income and a
corresponding increase in the allowance for loan losses. This provision was
$408,000 in 1995 compared to $120,000 and $240,000 in 1994 and 1993. For an
analysis of loan losses and the allowance for loan losses - See "RANDOLPH COUNTY
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS - Loans."
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income decreased to $223,000 in 1995 compared to $242,000 in
1994, a decrease of 7.9% after decreasing 42.1% in 1994. Fees from fiduciary
activities may fluctuate significantly due to the level of estate assets
administered. In 1993, a gain of $220,000 was realized from proceeds of an
investment security written off in 1992. A comparison of the components of non-
interest income is presented in the following table.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percentage of Change
Year Ended December 31 Over Prior Years
------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1995 1994 1993
------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fiduciary activities $ 36 $ 60 $ 46 (40.0)% 30.4% (28.1)%
Service charges on
deposit accounts 144 119 112 21.0 6.3 ( 9.7)
Securities gain 220
Other customer fees 28 37 27 (24.3) 37.0 8.0
Other 15 26 13 (42.3) 100.0 30.0
------------------------------
Total non-interest
income $223 $242 $418 ( 7.9)% (42.1)% 89.1%
------------------------------
------------------------------
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Operating expenses, other than interest expense and the provision for loan
losses, were $1,535,000 in 1995, a decrease from 1994 of 4.9%. Operating
expenses increased 15.0% to $1,614,000 in 1994 compared to $1,404,000 in 1993.
A comparison of the components of non-interest expense is presented in the
following table.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percentage of Change
Year Ended December 31 Over Prior Year
----------------------------------------------------------
1995 1994 1993 1995 1994 1993
----------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Salaries and employee
benefits $ 813 $ 823 $ 773 ( 1.2)% 6.5% 3.2%
Net occupancy expense 144 153 56 ( 5.9) 173.2 21.7
Equipment expense 78 62 46 25.8 34.8 12.2
Data processing fees 71 70 67 1.4 4.5 0.0
Deposit insurance
expense 78 157 151 (50.3) 4.0 7.1
Printing and office
supplies 45 54 49 (16.7) 10.2 11.4
Advertising 46 45 40 2.2 12.5 33.3
Legal and professional
fees 70 51 40 37.3 27.5 53.8
Director and committee
fees 66 71 70 ( 7.0) 1.4 2.9
Other expenses 124 128 112 ( 3.1) 14.3 16.7
--------------------------
Total other expenses $1,535 $1,614 $1,404 ( 4.9)% 15.0% 7.3%
--------------------------
--------------------------
</TABLE>
Salaries and employee benefits, the largest component of non-interest
expense, were $813,000 and represented 53.0% of the 1995 total compared to 51.0%
and 55.1% for 1994 and 1993. The number of full-time equivalent employees
decreased from 28 to 26 during the period December 31, 1994 to December 31,
1995.
Premises and equipment expense increased 3.3% in 1995 to $378,000 after
increasing 110.8% in 1994. The increases are primarily due to increased
depreciation charges and provision for real estate taxes for the major
renovation of the main office which was completed in 1994.
Deposit insurance expense decreased 50.3% in 1995 after increasing 4.0% in
1994 and 7.1% in 1993. A reduction in the assessment rate by the FDIC in the
final two quarters of 1995 resulted in the decrease in 1995. The Bank is
currently in the lowest regulatory risk category and deposits are assessed at
the lowest rate. Since the Bank Insurance Fund reached a mandated funding level
in 1995, the assessment rate for the Bank has been further reduced to the $2,000
minimum level permissible in 1996.
32
<PAGE>
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense for 1995 was $267,000, as compared to $303,000 recorded
in 1994 and $410,000 in 1993. The decrease in income taxes of $36,000 for 1995
was due primarily to a decrease in pre-tax income of $171,000. Income taxes
also decreased in 1994 compared to 1993 due to the lower level of taxable
income. The effective tax rate was 28.6% for 1995 and 27.4% for 1994.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
OVERVIEW
At year-end 1995, Randolph County's consolidated assets decreased to
$73,219,000 compared to $78,432,000 at December 31, 1994. Average assets were
$72,606,000 during 1995, which represents a decrease of 7.8% compared to 1994
averages.
The financial condition of Randolph County at December 31, 1995, is
presented in the comparative balance sheet of the consolidated financial
statements included in this Proxy Statement-Prospectus. The following
discussion addresses investments, loans and other components of earning assets,
sources of funds supporting these earning assets, capital resources, and
liquidity.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The Bank maintains an investment portfolio to provide for liquidity, to
correct asset-liability imbalances over time, and to provide income. The bond
portfolio decreased by 14.1% from December 31, 1993 to December 31, 1994 and
decreased 23.4% from December 31, 1994 to December 31, 1995. Proceeds from
investment securities were used to fund deposit outflows.
The portfolio consists of U.S. Treasury and Agency obligations, non-taxable
and taxable obligations of states and municipalities and corporate obligations.
Certain local issues of the portfolio are unrated by a major rating service. In
each case, the Bank believes the unrated issues have investment quality
characteristics.
In December 1995, pursuant to a one-time opportunity to do so, the Bank
reclassified its entire investment portfolio as "available for sale" from "held
to maturity" as defined in SFAS 115. The reclassification was made to increase
the liquidity of the portfolio and give the Bank greater flexibility in
portfolio management. The regulatory agencies have announced that changes in a
bank's capital account due to changes in the market value of "available for
sale" securities would not in itself trigger certain regulatory action thus
reducing regulatory risks previously associated with large holdings of
"available for sale" securities.
33
<PAGE>
LOANS
Loans decreased .6% to $43,494,000 at December 31, 1995 compared to
$43,778,000 at December 31, 1994. Growth remained particularly strong in real
estate loans, which were 19.9% higher than the same period a year earlier. The
Bank increased its residential real estate portfolio because of the low-risk
nature of the loans, demand for such loans and lack of demand for traditional
commercial credits, and a decided regulatory emphasis toward real estate lending
as a key element in Community Reinvestment Act and other regulatory assessments
of the Bank. Consumer loans decreased from the high levels of 1994 and 1993 as
special rates and promotions were discontinued.
Randolph County experienced growth in loans at December 31, 1994 compared
to December 31, 1993 as loans increased 8.5% to $43,778,000 from $40,351,000.
Loan growth in 1994 occurred primarily in real estate and consumer loans.
The loan portfolio at the dates indicated is presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
--------------------------
(in Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Loans at December 31:
Commercial and industrial loans $ 3,230 $ 3,578
Agricultural production financing and
other loans to farmers 6,063 5,681
Real estate loans 22,590 18,848
Individuals' loans for household and
other personal expenditures 12,988 17,016
Tax-exempt loans 85 90
Other loans 5 47
--------------------------
44,961 45,260
Unearned interest on loans (1,467) (1,482)
--------------------------
Total loans $43,494 $43,778
--------------------------
--------------------------
</TABLE>
LOAN QUALITY
The allowance for loan losses was $594,000 at December 31, 1995,
representing 1.37% of total loans compared to $489,000 at December 31, 1994
which represented 1.12% of total loans. Net chargeoffs to average loans were
.69% and .25% for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994. During 1995,
one chargeoff represented 59% of total chargeoffs for the year. The ratio of
provision for loan losses to average loans was .56% for year ended December 31,
1995 and .15% for the same period in 1994. The allowance for loan losses was
substantially greater than nonperforming loans at both December 31, 1995 and
1994.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate
by management to absorb potential loan losses as determined by evaluations of
the loan portfolio on a continuing basis. This evaluation by management
includes consideration of past loan loss experience, changes in the composition
of the loan portfolio, the volume and condition of loans outstanding and current
market and economic conditions.
34
<PAGE>
The provision for loan losses charged to expense was $408,000 in 1995 and
$120,000 in 1994. Loan losses, net of recoveries, charged against the allowance
were $303,000 in 1995, compared to $198,000 in 1994.
A summary of loan loss experience and management's allocation of the
allowance for loan losses to various loan categories for the years indicated
follows.
SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31
--------------------------
1995 1994
--------------------------
(in Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at January 1 $489 $567
Chargeoffs:
Commercial 245 128
Real estate mortgage 12
Installment 79 78
--------------------------
Total chargeoffs 324 218
--------------------------
Recoveries:
Commercial 5 5
Installment 16 15
--------------------------
Total recoveries 21 20
--------------------------
Net chargeoffs 303 198
--------------------------
Provisions for loan losses 408 120
--------------------------
Balance at December 31 $594 $489
--------------------------
--------------------------
Ratio of net chargeoffs during the period to
average loans outstanding during the period. .69% .25%
</TABLE>
LOAN LOSS CHARGEOFF PROCEDURES
The Board of Directors has weekly meetings at which loan delinquencies,
maturities and problems are reviewed. The Board of Directors meets weekly to
approve or disapprove all new or disapprove any loan which is in excess of an
individual loan officer's lending limit.
All chargeoffs are approved by the Bank's Board. The Bank charges off
loans when a determination is made that all or a portion of a loan is not
collectable or as a result of examinations by regulators and the independent
auditors.
35
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AT DECEMBER 31:
Presented below is an analysis of the composition of the allowance for loan
losses and per cent of loans in each category total loans:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
----------------------------------------------
Amount Per Cent Amount Per Cent
----------------------------------------------
(in Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31:
Commercial, financial and
agricultural $400 21.6% $268 21.5%
Real estate - mortgage 79 51.9 66 43.1
Installment 115 26.5 155 35.4
----------------------------------------------
Totals $594 100.0% $489 100.0%
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
As indicated by the following table, on December 31, 1995 Randolph County's
nonperforming loans totaled $36,000 a decrease of $307,000 from year-end 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31
-----------------------
1995 1994
-----------------------
(in Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Nonaccruing loans $ 0 $ 0
Loans contractually past due 90 days or
more other than nonaccruing 36 343
-----------------------
$36 $343
-----------------------
-----------------------
</TABLE>
Nonaccruing loans are loans which are reclassified to a nonaccruing status
when in management's judgment the collateral value and financial condition of
the borrower do not justify accruing interest. Interest previously recorded but
not deemed collectible is reversed and charged against current income. Interest
income on these loans is then recognized when collected.
Management has identified certain other loans totaling $631,000 as of
December 31, 1995, not included in the risk elements table, which are current as
to principal and interest, about which there are doubts as to the borrowers'
ability to comply with present repayment terms.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Randolph County generally relies on customers' deposits along with
shareholders' equity, to fund its earning assets.
Average total deposits were $57,580,000 in 1995, a decrease of 9.3% from
the prior year.
36
<PAGE>
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Randolph County continues to maintain a strong capital position, to support
its current needs and provide a sound foundation for further expansion.
During 1995, stockholders' equity increased to $ 8,753,000, as a result of
net income after dividends of $276,000 and the net unrealized gain on securities
available for sale of $38,000 (net of taxes of $15,000). The dividend payout
ratio was 41.3% in 1995 compared to 34.4% in 1994 and was consistent with
management's policy of maintaining an appropriate balance between earnings
returned to stockholders in the form of dividends and earnings retained to
support future growth. Book value per share at year-end advanced to $317.66
from $302.06 one year earlier, an increase of 5.2% after increasing 6.7% in
1994. Randolph County continues to exceed all regulatory capital requirements.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity is a measure of Randolph County's ability to meet its customers'
present and future deposit withdrawals and/or increased loan demand. Randolph
County manages its liquidity through a coordinated asset/liability management
program.
Liquidity is provided by projecting credit demand and other financial needs
and then maintaining sufficient cash and assets readily convertible into cash to
meet these requirements. Randolph County has provided for its liquidity needs
through growth in core deposits, maturing loans, investments in its securities
portfolio and by maintaining adequate balances in money market assets. At
December 31, 1995, Randolph County had $10.7 million or 14.6% of total assets in
investment securities, federal funds sold and interest bearing time deposits
maturing within one year. This is considered by management to be more than
adequate in view of projected liquidity needs.
ACCOUNTING MATTERS
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 119 ("SFAS 119")
requires disclosures about derivative financial instruments - futures, forwards,
swap and option contracts and other financial instruments with similar
characteristics (e.g., interest rate caps or floors and loan commitments). The
definition of derivatives excludes all on-balance sheet receivables and
payables, including those that "derive" their values or cash flows from the
price of another security or index, such as mortgage-backed securities and
interest-only obligations.
SFAS 119 requires disclosures about amounts, nature and terms of
derivatives that are not subject to SFAS 105 because they do not result in off-
balance sheet risk of accounting loss. It requires that distinction be made
between financial instruments held or issued for trading purposes and financial
instruments held or issued for purposes other than trading. The required
disclosures, either in the body of the financial statements or in the footnotes,
include: (i) the face or contract amount (or notional principal amount) and (ii)
the nature and terms, including at a
37
<PAGE>
minimum, a discussion of (1) the credit and market risk of those instruments,
(2) the cash requirements of those instruments and (3) the related accounting
policy.
SFAS 119 amends SFAS 105 and 107 to require disaggregation of information
about financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk of accounting loss and
to require that fair value information be presented without combining,
aggregating or netting the fair values of derivatives with fair value of
nonderivatives and be presented together with the related carrying amounts in
the body of the financial statements, a single footnote or a summary table in a
form that makes it clear whether the amounts represent assets or liabilities.
SFAS 119 was effective for Randolph County's financial statements issued for the
year ended December 31, 1995.
At December 31, Randolph County did not have any derivative financial
instruments as defined in SFAS 119.
ACCOUNTING FOR MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
During 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS
No. 122 ("SFAS 122") ACCOUNTING FOR MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS. SFAS 122
pertains to mortgage banking enterprises and financial institutions that conduct
operations that are substantially similar to the primary operations of a
mortgage banking enterprise. SFAS 122 eliminates the accounting distinction
between mortgage servicing rights that are acquired through loan origination
activities and those acquired through purchase transactions. Under SFAS 122, if
a mortgage banking enterprise sells or securities loans and retains the mortgage
servicing rights, the enterprise must allocate the total cost of the mortgage
loans to the mortgage servicing rights and the loans (without the rights based
on their relative fair values if is practicable to estimate those fair values.
If it is not practicable, the entire cost should be allocated to the mortgage
loans and no cost should be allocated to the mortgage servicing rights. An
entity would measure impairment of mortgage servicing rights and loans based on
the excess of the carrying amount of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio
over the fair value of that portfolio.
SFAS 122 is to be applied prospectively in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 1995, to transactions in which an entity acquires mortgage
servicing rights and to impairment evaluations of all capitalized mortgage
servicing rights. Randolph County currently does not originate and sell
mortgage loans, so SFAS 122 is not expected to have a material effect on
financial conditions or results of operations in 1996.
ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The FASB issued SFAS 123, STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION. In December, 1994, the
FASB decided to require expanded disclosures rather than recognition of
compensation cost for fixed, in the money, options rather than recognition of
compensation expense as was originally proposed.
This statement establishes a fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based compensation plans. The FASB encourages employers to recognize the
related compensation expense: however, employers are permitted to continue to
apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25. Employers that choose to continue
to follow APB
38
<PAGE>
No. 25 are required to disclose in notes to the financial statements the pro
forma effects on their net income and earnings per share of the new accounting
method.
SFAS 123 is effective for Randolph County in 1996. Currently Randolph
County has no stock-based compensation plans and adoption of SFAS No. 123 is not
expected to have any effect on 1996 financial statements.
INFLATION
Changing prices of goods, services, and capital affect the financial
position of every business enterprise. The level of market interest rates and
the price of funds loaned or borrowed fluctuate due to changes in the rate of
inflation and various other factors, including government monetary policy.
Fluctuating interest rates affect Randolph County's net interest income,
loan volume, and other operating expenses, such as employees' salaries and
benefits, reflecting the effects of escalating prices, as well as increased
levels of operations and other factors. As the inflation rate increases, the
purchasing power of the dollar decreases. Those holding fixed-rate monetary
assets incur a loss, while those holding fixed rate monetary liabilities enjoy a
gain. The nature of a bank holding company's operations is such that there will
be an excess of monetary assets over monetary liabilities, and, thus, a bank
holding company will tend to suffer from an increase in the rate of inflation
and benefit from a decrease.
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
OF FIRST MERCHANTS, RANDOLPH COUNTY AND SUBSIDIARIES
BANK HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION
First Merchants and Randolph County are registered as bank holding
companies and are subject to the regulations of the Federal Reserve under the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHC Act"). Bank holding
companies are required to file periodic reports with and are subject to periodic
examination by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has issued regulations
under the BHC Act requiring a bank holding company to serve as a source of
financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. It is the policy of
the Federal Reserve that, pursuant to this requirement, a bank holding company
should stand ready to use its resources to provide adequate capital funds to its
subsidiary banks during periods of financial stress or adversity. Additionally,
under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
("FDICIA"), a bank holding company is required to guarantee the compliance of
any insured depository institution subsidiary that may become "undercapitalized"
(as defined in the statute) with the terms of any capital restoration plan filed
by such subsidiary with its appropriate federal banking agency up to the lesser
of (i) an amount equal to 5% of the institution's total assets at the time the
institution became undercapitalized, or (ii) the amount that is necessary (or
would have been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all
applicable capital standards as of the time the institution fails to comply with
such capital restoration plan. Under the BHC Act, the Federal Reserve has the
authority to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or
relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary (other than a nonbank subsidiary of a
bank) upon the Federal Reserve's determination that such activity or control
constitutes a serious
39
<PAGE>
risk to the financial soundness and stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank
holding company.
First Merchants and Randolph County are prohibited by the BHC Act from
acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the outstanding shares
of any class of voting stock or substantially all of the assets of any bank or
savings association or merging or consolidating with another bank holding
company without prior approval of the Federal Reserve. Additionally, First
Merchants and Randolph County are prohibited by the BHC Act from engaging in or
from acquiring ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of
any class of voting stock of any company engaged in a nonbanking business unless
such business is determined by the Federal Reserve to be so closely related to
banking as to be a proper incident thereto. The BHC Act does not place
territorial restrictions on the activities of such nonbanking-related
activities.
CAPITAL ADEQUACY GUIDELINES FOR BANK HOLDING COMPANIES
Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve's
risk-based capital guidelines which require a minimum ratio of total capital to
risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet activities such as
standby letters of credit) of 8%. At least half of the total required capital
must be "Tier 1 capital," consisting principally of common shareholders' equity,
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative
perpetual preferred stock and minority interest in the equity accounts of
consolidated subsidiaries, less certain goodwill items. The remainder ("Tier 2
capital") may consist of a limited amount of subordinated debt and intermediate-
term preferred stock, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt
securities, cumulative perpetual preferred stock, and a limited amount of the
general loan loss allowance. In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines,
the Federal Reserve has adopted a Tier 1 (leverage) capital ratio under which
the bank holding company must maintain a minimum level of Tier 1 capital to
average total consolidated assets of 3% in the case of bank holding companies
which have the highest regulatory examination ratings and are not contemplating
significant growth or expansion. All other bank holding companies are expected
to maintain a ratio of at least 1% to 2% above the stated minimum.
The following are First Merchants' and Randolph County's regulatory capital
ratios as of December 31, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST MERCHANTS RANDOLPH COUNTY
--------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Tier 1 Capital: 16.99% 16.78%
Total Capital: 18.07 17.92
Leverage Ratio: 10.98 11.90
</TABLE>
BANK REGULATION
First Merchants Bank is a national bank and is supervised, regulated and
examined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC"). First
United,
40
<PAGE>
Pendleton and the Bank are state banks chartered in Indiana and are supervised,
regulated and examined by the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions. In
addition, First United, Pendleton and the Bank are supervised and regulated by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"). Each regulator has the
authority to issue cease-and-desist orders if it determines that activities of
the bank regularly represent an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a
violation of law.
Both federal and state law extensively regulate various aspects of the
banking business such as reserve requirements, truth-in-lending and truth-in-
savings disclosure, equal credit opportunity, fair credit reporting, trading in
securities and other aspects of banking operations. Current federal law also
requires banks, among other things, to make deposited funds available within
specified time periods.
Insured state-chartered banks are prohibited under FDICIA from engaging as
principal in activities that are not permitted for national banks, unless (i)
the FDIC determines that the activity would pose no significant risk to the
appropriate deposit insurance fund and (ii) the bank is, and continues to be, in
compliance with all applicable capital standards.
BANK CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The FDIC and the OCC have adopted risk-based capital ratio guidelines to
which state-chartered banks and national banks under their respective
supervision are subject. The guidelines establish a systematic analytical
framework that makes regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to
differences in risk profiles among banking organizations. Risk-based capital
ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet
commitments to four risk weighted categories, with higher levels of capital
being required for the categories perceived as representing greater risk.
Like the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve, these
guidelines divide a bank's capital into two tiers. Banks are required to
maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8%. The FDIC or OCC may, however,
set higher capital requirements when a bank's particular circumstances warrant.
Banks experiencing or anticipating significant growth are expected to maintain
capital ratios, including tangible capital positions, well above the minimum
levels.
In addition, the FDIC and OCC established guidelines prescribing a minimum
Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets as specified in
the guidelines). These guidelines provide for a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio
of 3% for banks that meet certain specified criteria, including that they have
the highest regulatory rating and are not experiencing or anticipating
significant growth. All other banks are required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage
ratio of 3% plus a additional 100 to 200 basis points.
All of First Merchants' affiliate banks as well as the Bank exceed the
risk-based capital guidelines of the FDIC and OCC as of December 31, 1995.
FDICIA requires each federal banking agency to revise its risk-based
capital standards within 18 months of their enactment to ensure that those
standards take adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit
risk and the risk of nontraditional activities, as well as reflect the actual
performance and expected
41
<PAGE>
risk of loss on multifamily mortgages. Banking regulators continue to indicate
their desire to raise capital requirements applicable to banking organizations
beyond their current levels. Neither First Merchants nor Randolph County is
able to predict whether and when higher capital requirements would be imposed
and, if so, to what levels and on what schedule.
BRANCHES AND AFFILIATES
Branching by First Merchants' affiliate banks is subject to the
jurisdiction, and requires the prior approval, of the bank's primary federal
regulatory authority and, if the branching bank is a state bank, of the Indiana
Department of Financial Institutions.
First Merchants' affiliate banks and the Bank are subject to the Federal
Reserve Act, which restricts financial transactions between banks and affiliated
companies. The statute limits credit transactions between a bank and its
executive officers and its affiliates, prescribes terms and conditions for bank
affiliate transactions deemed to be consistent with safe and sound banking
practices, and restricts the types of collateral security permitted in
connection with a bank's extension of credit to an affiliate.
FDICIA
FDICIA requires, among other things, federal bank regulatory authorities to
take "prompt corrective action" with respect to banks which do not meet minimum
capital requirements. For these purposes, FDICIA establishes five capital
tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.
The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action
provisions of FDICIA. Among other things, the regulations define the relevant
capital measures for the five capital categories. An institution is deemed to
be "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or
greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater, and a leverage
ratio of 5% or greater, and is not subject to a regulatory order, agreement or
directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.
An institution is deemed to be "adequately capitalized" if it has a total risk-
based capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% or
greater, and generally a leverage ratio of 4% or greater. An institution is
deemed to be "undercapitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of
less than 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4%, or generally a
leverage ratio of less than 4%, and "significantly undercapitalized" if it has a
total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of less than 3%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3%. An institution is
deemed to be "critically undercapitalized" if it has a ratio of tangible equity
(as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than
2%.
"Undercapitalized" banks are subject to growth limitations and are required
to submit a capital restoration plan. A bank's compliance with such plan is
required to be guaranteed by any company that controls the undercapitalized
institution as described above. If an "undercapitalized" bank fails to submit
an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized.
"Significantly
42
<PAGE>
undercapitalized" banks are subject to one or more of a number of requirements
and restrictions, including an order by the FDIC to sell sufficient voting stock
to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets and cease
receipt of deposits from correspondent banks, and restrictions on compensation
of executive officers. "Critically undercapitalized" institutions may not,
beginning 60 days after become "critically undercapitalized," make any payment
of principal or interest on certain subordinated debt or extend credit for a
highly leveraged transaction or enter into any transaction outside the ordinary
course of business. In addition, "critically undercapitalized" institutions are
subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator.
FDICIA further directs that each federal banking agency prescribe standards
for depository institutions and depository institution holding companies
relating to internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth,
management compensation, a maximum ratio of classified assets to capital,
minimum earnings sufficient to absorb losses, a minimum ratio of market value to
book value or publicly traded shares and such other standards as the agency
deemed appropriate. The federal banking agencies have issued certain advance
notices of proposed rulemakings, soliciting comments on the implementation of
these FDICIA provisions. Neither First Merchants or Randolph County can predict
on what form such rules will eventually be adopted or what effect such rules
will have on First Merchants' affiliate banks or the Bank.
DEPOSIT INSURANCE
The deposits of First Merchants' affiliate banks are insured up to $100,000
per insured account, by the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF"). Accordingly, deposit
insurance premiums are paid to BIF. The Bank's deposits are insured up to
$100,000 per insured account by the BIF. If the FDIC believes that an increase
in the insurance rates is necessary, it may increase the insurance premiums
applicable to the BIF.
FDICIA required the FDIC to issue regulations, effective January 1, 1994,
which establish a system for setting deposit insurance premiums based upon the
risks a particular bank or savings association poses to the deposit insurance
funds. Effective January 1, 1993, the FDIC adopted a final rule that implements
a transitional risk-based assessment system whereby a base insurance premium,
yet unspecified, will be adjusted according to the capital category and
subcategory of an institution to one of three capital categories consisting of
(1) well capitalized, (2) adequately capitalized, or (3) undercapitalized, and
one of three subcategories consisting of (a) health, (b) supervisory concern, or
(c) substantial supervisory concern. An institution's assessment rate will
depend upon the capital category and supervisory category to which it is
assigned. Assessment rates will range from 0.23% for an institution in the
highest category (i.e., well capitalized) to 0.31% for an institution in the
lowest category (i.e. undercapitalized and substantial supervisory concern).
The supervisory subgroup to which an institution is assigned by the FDIC is
confidential and may not be disclosed. Deposit insurance assessments may
increase depending upon the category and subcategory, if any, to which the bank
is assigned by the FDIC. Any increase in insurance assessments could have an
adverse effect on the earnings of First Merchants' affiliate banks.
43
<PAGE>
RECENT LEGISLATION
The Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
("Act") contains seven titles pertaining to community development and home
ownership protection, small business capital formation, paperwork reduction and
regulatory improvement, money laundering and flood insurance. The Act grants
the authority to several agencies to promulgate regulations under the Act. No
regulations have yet been promulgated. Neither First Merchants, Randolph County
nor the Bank is able to predict the impact of the Act on the banking industry.
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
("Riegle-Neal Act") allows for interstate banking and interstate branching
without regard to whether such activity is permissible under state law. Since
September 29, 1995, bank holding companies were allowed to acquire banks
anywhere in the United States subject to certain state restrictions. Beginning
on June 1, 1997, an insured bank may merge with an insured bank in another state
without regard to whether such merger is prohibited by state law. Additionally,
an out-of-state bank may acquire the branches of an insured bank in another
state without acquiring the entire bank; provided, however, that the law of the
state where the branch is located permits such an acquisition. States may
permit interstate branching earlier than June 1, 1997, where both states
involved with the bank merger expressly permit it by statute. Further, bank
holding companies may merge existing bank subsidiaries located in different
states into one bank.
On March 14, 1996, the Governor of the State of Indiana signed
comprehensive new interstate banking and branching legislation which implements
the Riegle-Neal Act. This act carries an emergency clause which made it
effective immediately on passage.
The new legislation accelerates the date for interstate banking and
branching within Indiana. The following activities are now permitted:
(i) A merger of banks in different states, with the resulting bank operating
the acquired bank as a branch. Any branch may then be used to open
additional branches within that state.
(ii) A branch by acquisition in another state by purchase of a single branch
by an out of state bank.
(iii) The establishment of a de novo branch in another state by an out of state
bank.
Provisions (ii) and (iii) above require reciprocity with the home state of
the bank establishing the branch until June 1, 1997, when the provisions of the
Riegle-Neal Act become effective irrespective of state law. Furthermore, these
provisions permit an out of state bank to establish other branches throughout
Indiana once their initial branch is owned in Indiana. Additionally, the new
Indiana statute expands the definition of "branch" to include a mobile branch.
Since September 29, 1995, insured bank subsidiaries have been allowed to
act as an agent for an affiliated bank or thrift in offering limited banking
services
44
<PAGE>
(receive deposits, renew time deposits, close loans, service loans and receive
payments on loan obligations) both within the same state and across state lines.
Neither First Merchants, Randolph County nor the Bank is able to predict
with certainty the impact of this legislation on the banking industry.
ADDITIONAL MATTERS
In addition to the matters discussed above, First Merchants' affiliate
banks and the Bank are subject to additional regulation of their activities,
including a variety of consumer protection regulations affecting their lending,
deposit and collection activities and regulations affecting secondary mortgage
market activities.
The earnings of financial institutions are also affected by general
economic conditions and prevailing interest rates, both domestic and foreign,
and by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States Government and its
various agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve.
Additional legislation and administrative actions affecting the banking
industry may be considered by the United States Congress, state legislatures and
various regulatory agencies, including those referred to above. It cannot be
predicted with certainty whether such legislation of administrative action will
be enacted or the extent to which the banking industry in general or First
Merchants and its affiliate banks in particular would be affected thereby.
COMPARISON OF COMMON STOCK
The rights of holders of Randolph County common stock who receive First
Merchants common stock in the Merger will be governed by the IBCL, the state in
which First Merchants is incorporated, and by First Merchants' Articles of
Incorporation ("First Merchants' Articles") and By-Laws. The rights of Randolph
County shareholders are governed by the IBCL, the state in which Randolph County
is incorporated, and by Randolph County's Articles of Incorporation ("Randolph
County's Articles") and By-Laws. The rights of Randolph County shareholders
differ in certain respects from the rights they would have as First Merchants
shareholders, including certain anti-takeover measures and the vote percentage
required for the amendment of certain significant provisions of the articles of
incorporation and for the approval of certain significant corporate
transactions. The following summary comparison of First Merchants common stock
and Randolph County common stock includes all material features of such stocks
but does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to First Merchants' Articles and By-Laws and Randolph County's
Articles and By-Laws.
AUTHORIZED BUT UNISSUED SHARES
First Merchants' Articles authorize the issuance of 20,000,000 shares of
common stock, of which 5,060,661 whole shares were outstanding as of March 31,
1996. The remaining authorized but unissued shares of common stock may be
issued upon authorization of the Board of Directors without prior shareholder
approval. First
45
<PAGE>
Merchants has 500,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. These shares are
available to be issued, without prior shareholder approval, in classes with
relative rights, privileges and preferences determined for each class by the
Board of Directors of First Merchants. No shares of preferred stock have
currently been issued.
As of March 31, 1996, First Merchants had 151,988 shares of its common
stock reserved and remaining available for issuance under its Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and 203,775 shares of its common stock reserved and remaining
available for issuance under its Stock Option Plans. See "DESCRIPTION OF FIRST
MERCHANTS -- Compensation of Directors and -- Compensation of Executive
Officers."
The issuance of additional shares of First Merchants common stock to
persons who were not holders of First Merchants common stock prior to such
issuance or the issuance of First Merchants preferred stock may adversely affect
the interests of First Merchants shareholders.
Randolph County's Articles authorize the issuance of 60,000 shares of no
par value common stock, 27,555 of which shares are issued and outstanding.
Randolph County's Articles do not authorize the issuance of any other class of
stock.
PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS
As permitted by Indiana law, neither First Merchants' Articles nor Randolph
County's Articles provide for preemptive rights to subscribe for any new or
additional First Merchants or Randolph County shares of common stock.
Preemptive rights may be granted to First Merchants or Randolph County
shareholders if First Merchants' or Randolph County's Articles are amended
accordingly.
DIVIDEND RIGHTS
The holders of common stock of First Merchants and Randolph County are
entitled to dividends and other distributions when, as and if declared by their
respective Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. In
general, with respect to First Merchants, a dividend may not be paid if, after
giving it effect, (i) First Merchants would not be able to pay its debts as they
become due in the usual course of business, or (ii) First Merchants' total
assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless First
Merchants' Articles permitted otherwise, the amount that would be needed to
satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution, of shareholders whose
preferential rights are superior to those receiving the dividend if First
Merchants were to be dissolved at the time of the dividend. The same dividend
limitations apply to Randolph County shareholders.
The amount of dividends, if any, that may be declared by First Merchants in
the future will necessarily depend upon many factors, including, without
limitation, future earnings, capital requirements, business conditions and
capital levels of subsidiaries (since First Merchants is primarily dependent
upon dividends paid by its subsidiaries for revenues), the discretion of First
Merchants' Board of Directors and other factors that may be appropriate in
determining dividend policies.
46
<PAGE>
Dividends paid to First Merchants by its Indiana-chartered affiliate banks,
or paid to Randolph County by the Bank are limited by Indiana law to the balance
of the bank's undivided profits account adjusted for statutorily-defined bad
debts. The First Merchants Bank may pay dividends to First Merchants in cash on
its common stock only out of adjusted retained net profits for the year in which
the dividend is paid and the two preceding years.
Dividends paid by First Merchants' affiliate banks will ordinarily be
restricted to a lesser amount than is legally permissible because of the need
for the banks to maintain adequate capital consistent with the capital adequacy
guidelines promulgated by the banks' principal federal regulatory authorities.
See "REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OF FIRST MERCHANTS, RANDOLPH COUNTY AND
SUBSIDIARIES." If a bank's capital levels are deemed inadequate by the
regulatory authorities, payment of dividends to its parent holding company may
be prohibited without prior regulatory approval. Neither First Merchants'
present affiliate banks nor the Bank is subject to such a restriction.
VOTING RIGHTS
The holders of the outstanding shares of First Merchants and Randolph
County common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters presented
for shareholder vote. Neither First Merchants shareholders nor Randolph County
shareholders have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.
Indiana law generally requires that mergers, consolidations, sales, leases,
exchanges or other dispositions of all or substantially all of the assets of a
corporation be approved by a shareholder vote of a majority of votes entitled to
be cast at the shareholders meeting, subject to provisions in the corporations'
articles of incorporation requiring a higher percentage vote. First Merchants'
Articles provide that certain business combinations may, under certain
circumstances, require approval of more than a majority of the outstanding
voting shares of First Merchants common stock. Randolph County's Articles do
not contain such a provision. See "COMPARISON OF COMMON STOCK--Anti-Takeover
Provisions."
Indiana law requires shareholder approval for most amendments to a
corporation's articles of incorporation by a majority of a quorum present at a
shareholder's meeting (and, in certain cases, a majority of all shares held by
any voting group entitled to vote). Indiana law permits a corporation in its
articles of incorporation to prescribe a higher shareholder vote requirement for
certain amendments, and First Merchants' Articles require a super-majority
shareholder vote of seventy-five percent of the outstanding shares of common
stock for the amendment of certain significant provisions. Randolph County's
Articles do not contain such a provision.
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
The holders of First Merchants common stock possess dissenters' rights in
connection with certain mergers and other significant corporate actions. Under
Indiana law, a First Merchants shareholder is entitled to dissent from and
obtain payment of the fair value of the shareholder's shares in the event of
(i) consummation of a plan of merger to which First Merchants is a party, if
shareholder approval is required and the shareholder is entitled to vote
thereon; (ii) consummation of a plan of share exchange by which First Merchants'
shares will
47
<PAGE>
be acquired, if the shareholder is entitled to vote thereon; (iii) consummation
of a sale or exchange of all, or substantially all, the property of First
Merchants other than in the usual course of business, if the shareholder is
entitled to vote thereon; (iv) approval of a control share acquisition under
Indiana law; and (v) any corporate action taken pursuant to a shareholder vote
to the extent the articles of incorporation, by-laws or a resolution of the
board of directors provides that voting or non-voting shareholders are entitled
to dissent and obtain payment for their shares. Randolph County shareholders
have similar dissenters' rights.
The dissenters' rights provisions described above do not apply, however, to
the holders of shares of any class or series with respect to a merger, share
exchange or sale or exchange of property if the shares of that class or series
were registered on a United States securities exchange registered under the
Exchange Act or traded on the NASDAQ National Market System or a similar market.
As of the date of this Proxy Statement-Prospectus, shares of First Merchants
common stock are traded on the NASDAQ National Market System, and shares of
Randolph County common stock are not registered on a securities exchange nor
traded on the NASDAQ National Market System or any similar market. With respect
to dissenters' rights of Randolph County shareholders in connection with the
Merger, see the discussion under "PROPOSED MERGER -- Rights of Dissenting
Shareholders" and also Appendix B.
LIQUIDATION RIGHTS
In the event of any liquidation or dissolution of First Merchants, the
holders of shares of First Merchants common stock are entitled to receive pro
rata with respect to the number of shares held by them any assets distributable
to shareholders, subject to the payment of First Merchants' liabilities and any
rights of creditors and holders of shares of First Merchants preferred stock
then outstanding. In the event of any liquidation or dissolution of Randolph
County, the holders of shares of Randolph County common stock are entitled to
receive pro rata with respect to the number of shares held by them any assets
distributable to shareholders, subject to the payment of Randolph County's
liabilities and any rights of creditors.
ASSESSMENT AND REDEMPTION
Under Indiana law, neither the shares of First Merchants common stock nor
of Randolph County common stock are liable to further assessment.
Under Indiana law, First Merchants may redeem or acquire shares of its
common stock with funds legally available therefor, and shares so acquired
constitute authorized but unissued shares. First Merchants may not redeem or
acquire shares of common stock if, after giving such redemption or acquisition
effect, First Merchants would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in
the usual course of business, or First Merchants' total assets would be less
than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless First Merchants' Articles
permitted otherwise, the amount that would be needed to satisfy the preferential
rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose preferential rights are superior
to those whose stock is being redeemed or acquired if First Merchants were to be
dissolved at the time of the redemption or acquisition. Randolph County has
similar redemption rights under Indiana law.
48
<PAGE>
First Merchants and Randolph County must give prior notice to the Federal
Reserve if the consideration to be paid by them for any redemption or
acquisition of their respective shares, when aggregated with the consideration
paid for all redemptions or acquisitions for the preceding 12 months, equals or
exceeds 10% of the consolidated net worth of the company involved.
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS
The anti-takeover measures applicable to First Merchants and Randolph
County, as described below, may have the effect of discouraging or rendering it
more difficult for a person or other entity to acquire control of First
Merchants or Randolph County. These measures may have the effect of
discouraging certain tender offers for shares of First Merchants common stock or
Randolph County common stock which might otherwise be made at premium prices or
certain other acquisition transactions which might be viewed favorably by a
significant number of shareholders.
INDIANA LAW. Under the business combinations provisions of the IBCL, any
10% shareholder of an Indiana corporation, with a class of voting shares
registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or which has
specifically adopted this provision in the corporation's articles of
incorporation, is prohibited for a period of five (5) years from completing a
business combination with the corporation unless, prior to the acquisition of
such 10% interest, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the
acquisition of such interest or the proposed business combination. Further, the
corporation and a 10% shareholder may not consummate a business combination
unless all provisions of the articles of incorporation of the corporation are
complied with and a majority of disinterested shareholders approve the
transaction or all shareholders receive a price per share determined in
accordance with the business combinations provision of the IBCL.
An Indiana corporation may elect to remove itself from the protection
provided by the Indiana business combinations provision, but such an election
remains ineffective for eighteen (18) months and does not apply to a combination
with a shareholder who acquired a 10% ownership position prior to the effective
time of the election. First Merchants is covered by the business combinations
provisions of the IBCL and Randolph County is not covered. The constitutional
validity of the business combinations provision of Indiana law has in the past
been challenged and has been upheld by the United States Supreme Court.
In addition to the business combinations provision, the IBCL also contains
a "control share acquisition" provision which, although different in structure
from the business combinations provision, may have a similar effect of
discouraging or making more difficult a hostile takeover of an Indiana
corporation. This provision, however, also may have the effect of discouraging
premium bids for outstanding shares. The IBCL provides that, unless otherwise
provided in the corporation's articles of incorporation or by-laws, certain
acquisitions of shares of the corporation's common stock will be accorded voting
rights only if a majority of the disinterested shareholders approves a
resolution granting the potential acquiror the ability to vote such shares.
Upon disapproval of the resolution, the shares held by the acquiror shall be
redeemed by the corporation at the fair value of the shares as determined by the
control share acquisition provision.
This provision does not apply to a plan of affiliation and merger if the
corporation complies with the applicable merger provisions and is a party to the
agreement of merger or plan of share exchange. First Merchants is subject to
the
49
<PAGE>
control share acquisition provision. Randolph County is not subject to the
control share acquisition provision as a result of it having fewer than 100
shareholders.
FIRST MERCHANTS' ARTICLES. In addition to the protection afforded by the
IBCL, First Merchants' Articles provide that the directors of First Merchants
shall be divided into three classes, each serving three (3) year terms with one
class to be elected at each annual meeting of shareholders. First Merchants'
Articles provide that directors may be removed with or without cause by a
two-thirds (2/3) vote of the shares entitled to vote; provided, however, that if
the Board by a two-thirds (2/3) vote recommends removal of a director, that
director may be removed by a majority of the shares entitled to vote.
First Merchants' Articles also require the approval of the holders of
three-fourths (3/4) of the voting stock as a condition of certain business
combinations (which included but are not limited to mergers, consolidations,
sales, leases, liquidations, dissolutions, certain reorganizations, and
agreements relating to the foregoing) involving any shareholder who owns more
than 10% of the voting stock, unless either the transaction is approved by a
two-thirds (2/3) vote of the Board or the shareholders are to receive fair
consideration (generally, an amount per share equal to the higher of (a) the
highest per share price paid for the stock in the two (2) years preceding the
business combination and (b) the per share book value for the stock) for their
shares in the business combination. In the event two-thirds (2/3) Board
approval is obtained or the fair consideration is to be paid, then approval of
the business combination would only require the approval of the holders of
two-thirds (2/3) of the voting stock.
The above referred to provision of First Merchants' Articles can be amended
only with the approval of three-fourths (3/4) of the voting stock.
The existence of authorized but unissued common and preferred stocks of
First Merchants may have an anti-takeover effect, as the issuance of additional
First Merchants shares with sufficient voting power could have a dilutive effect
on First Merchants stock and may result in the defeat of an attempt to acquire
control of First Merchants. The Board may issue shares of common stock and/or
preferred stock at any time without shareholder approval. The relative rights,
preferences, limitations and restrictions attendant with the ownership of the
preferred stock would be determined by the Board prior to the issuance thereof.
The Board would determine whether any voting rights would attach to the
preferred stock. The Board has no present plans to issue any preferred stock or
common stock other than in connection with the Merger. The issuance of
preferred or common stock in the future could result in the dilution of
ownership and control of First Merchants by common shareholders because there is
no guarantee that current shareholders will have an opportunity to purchase any
of the preferred or common stock when and if it is issued since they do not have
preemptive rights.
RANDOLPH COUNTY'S ARTICLES. In addition to the protection afforded by the
IBCL, Randolph County's Articles provide that if the Board of Directors of
Randolph County consists of nine or more members, the By-Laws may provide that
the Directors shall be divided into two or more classes whose term of office
shall expire at different times, but no term shall continue more than three (3)
years. At the present time, Randolph County's By-Laws do not provide for such a
classified Board.
Randolph County's Articles provide that in the event a shareholder of any
shares of Randolph County's common stock decides to sell, exchange, or in any
manner
50
<PAGE>
dispose of any shares held by such shareholder (other than transfers by such
holder to the estate of such holder or to a direct family member of that holder,
including spouses, siblings and lineal descendants), such selling shareholder
shall first offer to Randolph County the right to purchase all, or any part of,
the shares proposed to be sold on the same terms and conditions and at the same
purchase price per share as the purchase terms in the proposed sale.
The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock of Randolph
County may have an anti-takeover effect, as the issuance of additional Randolph
County shares with sufficient voting power could have a dilutive effect on
Randolph County's stock and may result in the defeat of an attempt to acquire
control of Randolph County. The Board of Directors of Randolph County may issue
shares of common stock at any time without shareholder approval. The Agreement
prohibits the issuance by Randolph County of additional shares of common stock.
DIRECTOR LIABILITY
Under the IBCL, a director of First Merchants or Randolph County will not
be liable to shareholders for any action taken as a director, or any failure to
take any action, unless (i) the director has breached or failed to perform his
duties as a director in good faith with the care an ordinarily prudent person in
a like position would exercise under similar circumstances and in a manner the
director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation and
(ii) such breach or failure to perform constitutes willful misconduct or
recklessness.
LEGAL OPINIONS
Certain legal matters in connection with the Agreement will be passed upon
for First Merchants by the law firm of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman, 2700
Market Tower, 10 West Market Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 and for
Randolph County by the law firm of Cook & Haviza, 111 North Main Street,
Winchester, Indiana 47394. Frank A. Bracken is of counsel with Bingham Summers
Welsh & Spilman and a director of First Merchants and First Merchants Bank.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of First Merchants incorporated by
reference in this Proxy Statement-Prospectus have been audited by Geo. S. Olive
& Co., LLC, independent public accountants, to the extent and for the periods
indicated in their report thereon, and have been so incorporated by reference in
this Proxy Statement-Prospectus in reliance upon such report of Geo. S. Olive &
Co., LLC given on the authority of such firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Randolph County and Union National
included in this Proxy Statement-Prospectus have been audited by Geo. S. Olive &
Co., LLC, independent public accountants, to the extent and for the periods
indicated in their reports thereon, and have been so included in this Proxy
Statement-Prospectus in reliance on the reports of Geo. S. Olive & Co., LLC
given on the authority of such firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
51
<PAGE>
Representatives of Geo. S. Olive & Co., LLC are not expected to be at the
Special Meeting of Shareholders of Randolph County.
OTHER MATTERS
The Special Meeting of Shareholders is called for the purposes set forth in
the Notice. The Board of Directors of Randolph County knows of no other matter
for action by shareholders at such Special Meeting other than the matters
described in the Notice. However, the enclosed proxy will confer discretionary
authority with respect to matters which are not known to the Board of Directors
at the time of the printing thereof and which may properly come before the
Special Meeting. It is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote
pursuant to the proxy with respect to such matters in accordance with the
recommendation of management of Randolph County.
52
<PAGE>
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
Independent Auditor's Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 . . F-4
Consolidated Statement of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. . . . . . F-7
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . F-9
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP
Independent Auditor's Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-23
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 . . F-24
Consolidated Statement of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-25
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993. . . . . . F-26
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-27
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . F-28
F-1
<PAGE>
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994
F-2
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Stockholders and
Board of Directors
Randolph County Bancorp
Winchester, Indiana
We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Randolph County Bancorp and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements described above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Randolph County Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for income taxes in 1993.
GEO. S. OLIVE & CO. LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana
January 17, 1996, except for the last
paragraph of the note on Loans and
Allowance as to which the date is
March 19, 1996
F-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December 31 1995 1994
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 4,080,023 $ 2,503,628
Federal funds sold 1,400,000 1,050,000
-------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents 5,480,023 3,553,628
Interest-bearing deposits 103,595
Investment securities
Available for sale 22,029,295
Held to maturity 28,776,202
-------------------------------
Total investment securities 22,029,295 28,776,202
Loans 43,493,754 43,778,184
Allowance for loan losses (593,580) (489,409)
-------------------------------
Net loans 42,900,174 43,288,775
Premises and equipment 1,331,159 1,459,800
Interest receivable 1,082,609 1,037,736
Other assets 292,182 315,625
-------------------------------
Total assets $73,219,037 $78,431,766
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Noninterest bearing $ 7,333,464 $ 6,537,517
Interest bearing 56,107,793 62,243,689
-------------------------------
Total deposits 63,441,257 68,781,206
Due to broker 387,591 795,000
Interest payable 380,724 304,932
Other liabilities 256,405 223,635
-------------------------------
Total liabilities 64,465,977 70,104,773
-------------------------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, $100 stated value
Authorized--60,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--27,555 and 27,567 shares 2,755,500 2,756,700
Paid-in capital 709,036 709,344
Retained earnings 5,250,057 4,860,949
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale 38,467
-------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 8,753,060 8,326,993
-------------------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $73,219,037 $78,431,766
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
INTEREST INCOME
Loans receivable
Taxable $3,857,471 $3,446,748 $3,358,934
Tax exempt 26,112 34,340 34,793
Investment securities
Taxable 854,488 1,024,299 1,182,463
Tax exempt 340,132 435,395 586,638
Federal funds sold 68,798 27,523 46,706
Deposits with financial institutions 5,297 1,055
-----------------------------------------------
Total interest income 5,152,298 4,968,305 5,210,589
-----------------------------------------------
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits 2,489,584 2,326,572 2,532,477
Short-term borrowings 8,636 44,095 3,927
-----------------------------------------------
Total interest expense 2,498,220 2,370,667 2,536,404
-----------------------------------------------
NET INTEREST INCOME 2,654,078 2,597,638 2,674,185
Provision for loan losses 408,000 120,000 240,000
-----------------------------------------------
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN
LOSSES 2,246,078 2,477,638 2,434,185
-----------------------------------------------
OTHER INCOME
Fiduciary activities 35,680 59,705 45,635
Service charges on deposit accounts 143,992 119,292 112,264
Other customer fees 28,425 36,184 27,246
Security gain 220,000
Other income 14,715 26,494 12,775
-----------------------------------------------
Total other income 222,812 241,675 417,920
-----------------------------------------------
OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits 812,950 822,890 773,491
Net occupancy expenses 143,934 152,663 56,404
Equipment expenses 77,953 62,107 45,691
Data processing fees 71,209 70,211 66,583
Deposit insurance expense 78,431 156,958 151,157
Printing and office supplies 45,087 53,839 48,686
Advertising 46,250 44,650 39,500
Legal and professional fees 69,685 50,541 40,457
Director and committee fees 65,900 71,050 69,800
Other expenses 123,128 129,372 111,848
-----------------------------------------------
Total other expenses 1,534,527 1,614,281 1,403,617
-----------------------------------------------
(continued)
F-5
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX AND CUMULATIVE
EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING METHOD $ 934,363 $1,105,032 $1,448,488
Income tax expense 267,337 302,931 409,877
-----------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE
IN ACCOUNTING METHOD 667,026 802,101 1,038,611
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN METHOD OF
ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES 33,500
-----------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 667,026 $ 802,101 $1,072,111
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
PER SHARE
Income before cumulative effect of change
in accounting method $24.20 $29.10 $37.68
Net income 24.20 29.10 38.89
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING 27,565 27,567 27,567
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET
COMMON STOCK UNREALIZED
--------------------------- GAIN ON
SECURITIES
SHARES PAID-IN RETAINED AVAILABLE
OUTSTANDING AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS FOR SALE TOTAL
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCES, JANUARY 1, 1993 9,189 $ 918,900 $709,344 $5,270,204 $6,898,448
Net income for 1993 1,072,111 1,072,111
Cash dividends ($11.50 per
share) (169,997) (169,997)
200% stock dividend 18,378 1,837,800 (1,837,800)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1993 27,567 2,756,700 709,344 4,334,518 7,800,562
Net income for 1994 802,101 802,101
Cash dividends ($10 per share) (275,670) (275,670)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1994 27,567 2,756,700 709,344 4,860,949 8,326,993
Net income for 1995 667,026 667,026
Cash dividends ($10 per share) (275,586) (275,586)
Unrealized gain on securities
available for sale, net of taxes
of $15,237 $38,467 38,467
Purchase of stock (12) (1,200) (308) (2,332) (3,840)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1995 27,555 $2,755,500 $709,036 $5,250,057 $38,467 $8,753,060
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 667,026 $ 802,101 $1,072,111
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities
Provision for loan losses 408,000 120,000 240,000
Depreciation and amortization 130,957 100,449 36,353
Deferred income tax (15,862) 27,159 (76,018)
Investment securities amortization, net 95,274 361,978 312,138
Security gain (220,000)
Net change in
Interest receivable (44,873) 68,134 (60,642)
Interest payable 75,792 47,644 (48,100)
Other assets 111,231 (263,005) 110,380
Other adjustments 48,578 3,474 (61,023)
------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,476,123 1,267,934 1,305,199
------------------------------------------------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net change in interest-bearing deposits (103,595) 100,000
Purchases of securities held to maturity (8,133,079) (11,802,796) (19,940,074)
Proceeds from maturities and payments of securities held
to maturity 14,441,000 16,055,577 17,880,875
Net change in loans (132,280) (3,718,068) (5,110,851)
Purchases of premises and equipment (2,316) (707,920) (483,189)
Premiums paid on life insurance (744,800)
Refunds of life insurance premiums 744,800
Other 82,053 47,510
------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 6,069,730 653,646 (8,250,529)
------------------------------------------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in
Noninterest-bearing, NOW, money market and savings
deposits (3,256,441) (8,282,200) 2,268,738
Certificates of deposit (2,083,507) 5,519,650 799,827
Cash dividends (275,670) (179,186) (169,997)
Purchase of stock (3,840)
------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (5,619,458) (2,941,736) 2,898,568
------------------------------------------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,926,395 (1,020,156) (4,046,762)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR 3,553,628 4,573,784 8,620,546
------------------------------------------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR $5,480,023 $3,553,628 $4,573,784
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Interest paid $2,422,418 $2,429,994 $2,584,504
Income tax paid 249,253 404,195 419,860
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-8
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of Randolph County Bancorp ("Company"),
and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Randolph County Bank ("Bank"), conform to
generally accepted accounting principles and reporting practices followed by the
banking industry. The more significant of the policies are described below.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company is a bank holding company whose principal activity is the ownership
and management of the Bank. The Bank operates under a state bank charter and
provides full banking services, including trust services. As a state bank, the
Bank is subject to the regulation of the Department of Financial Institutions,
State of Indiana and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The Bank generates commercial, mortgage and consumer loans and receives deposits
from customers located primarily in Randolph County, Indiana and surrounding
counties. The Bank's loans are generally secured by specific items of
collateral including real property, consumer assets and business assets.
Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its
debtors' ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon economic conditions
in the agricultural industry.
CONSOLIDATION--The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and the Bank after elimination of all material intercompany transactions
and accounts.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES--The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND
EQUITY SECURITIES, on January 1, 1994.
Debt securities are classified as held to maturity when the Company has the
positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Securities held
to maturity are carried at amortized cost. Debt securities not classified as
held to maturity are classified as available for sale. Securities available for
sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported
separately in stockholders' equity, net of tax.
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded as interest
income from securities. Realized gains and losses are recorded as net security
gains (losses). Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the
specific-identification method.
At January 1, 1994, the Bank determined there were no securities which should be
reclassified as available for sale, and therefore there was no change in total
stockholders' equity.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 115, investment securities were carried at
cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and discounts. Realized gains and
losses on sales were included in other income. Gains and losses on the sale of
securities were determined on the specific-identification method.
F-9
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
LOANS are carried at the principal amount outstanding. Interest income is
accrued on the principal balances of loans, except for installment loans with
add-on interest, for which a method that approximates the level yield method is
used. Loans are placed in a nonaccrual status when the collection of interest
becomes doubtful. Interest income previously accrued but not deemed collectible
is reversed and charged against current income. Interest on nonaccrual loans is
then recognized as income when collected.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES is maintained to absorb potential loan losses based on
management's continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio and its
judgment as to the impact of economic conditions on the portfolio. The
evaluation by management includes consideration of past loss experience, changes
in the composition of the portfolio, the current condition and amount of loans
outstanding, and the probability of collecting all amounts due. Impaired loans
are measured by the present value of expected future cash flows, or the fair
value of the collateral of the loan, if collateral dependent.
The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the
economic environment and market conditions. Management believes that, as of
December 31, 1995, the allowance for loan losses is adequate based on
information currently available. A worsening or protracted economic decline in
the area within which the Company operates would increase the likelihood of
additional losses due to credit and market risks and could create the need for
additional loss reserves.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT are carried at cost net of accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method for bank premises and
the declining-balance method for equipment based principally on the estimated
useful lives of the assets. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred
while major additions and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on
dispositions are included in current operations.
ADVERTISING COSTS are expensed as incurred.
INCOME TAX in the consolidated statement of income includes deferred income tax
provisions or benefits for all significant temporary differences in recognizing
income and expenses for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The
Company files consolidated income tax returns with its subsidiary.
EARNINGS PER SHARE have been computed based upon the weighted average common
shares outstanding during each year.
- --> ACQUISITION OF COMPANY
In January, 1996, the Company signed a definitive agreement to be acquired by
First Merchants Corporation ("First"), Muncie, Indiana. The agreement provides
that each stockholder of the Company would receive shares of First common stock
for each common share of Company stock held. The proposed transaction is
subject to the approval of the Company's stockholders and appropriate regulatory
authorities.
F-10
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
- --> RESTRICTION ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Bank is required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or on deposit with
the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve required at December 31, 1995, was
$586,000.
- --> INVESTMENT SECURITIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
-----------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
DECEMBER 31 COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available for sale
U.S. Treasury $ 3,709 $ 23 $ 8 $ 3,724
Federal agencies 4,892 28 10 4,910
State and municipal 8,428 50 18 8,460
Corporate obligations 4,937 25 27 4,935
------------------------------------------------------------
Total investment securities $21,966 $126 $63 $22,029
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994
------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
DECEMBER 31 COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Held to maturity
U.S. Treasury $ 5,468 $182 $ 5,286
Federal agencies 4,999 120 4,879
State and municipal 9,826 $20 84 9,762
Corporate obligations 8,483 5 185 8,303
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total investment securities $28,776 $25 $571 $28,230
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
F-11
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
The amortized cost and estimated market value of securities available for sale
at December 31, 1995, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected
maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the
right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
----------------------
AMORTIZED FAIR
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION AT DECEMBER 31 COST VALUE
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Within one year $ 9,073 $ 9,073
One to five years 12,406 12,454
Five to ten years 352 367
After ten years 135 135
--------- --------
Totals $21,966 $22,029
--------- --------
--------- --------
</TABLE>
Securities with a carrying value of $103,000 and $99,600 were pledged at
December 31, 1995 and 1994 to secure certain deposits and for other purposes as
permitted or required by law.
There were no sales of investment securities during 1995, 1994 or 1993.
However, a gain of $220,000 was realized in 1993 from proceeds of an investment
security previously written off in 1992. The tax expense on this gain was
$87,000 in the year ended December 31, 1993.
On December 31, 1995, the Bank transferred all securities from held to maturity
to available for sale in accordance with a transition reclassification allowed
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Such securities had a carrying
value of $21,966,000 and a fair value of $22,029,000.
F-12
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Commercial and industrial loans $ 3,230 $ 3,578
Real estate loans (includes $10,111 and $9,687 secured
by farmland) 22,590 18,848
Agricultural production financing and other loans to
farmers 6,063 5,681
Individuals' loans for household and other personal
expenditures 12,988 17,016
Tax-exempt loans 85 90
Other loans 5 47
--------------------
44,961 45,260
Unearned interest on loans (1,467) (1,482)
--------------------
Total loans $43,494 $43,778
--------------------
--------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for loan losses
Balances, January 1 $489 $567 $382
Provision for losses 408 120 240
Recoveries on loans 21 20 16
Loans charged off (324) (218) (71)
-------------------------------
Balances, December 31 $594 $489 $567
-------------------------------
Nonperforming loans -------------------------------
Nonaccruing loans $33
Loans contractually past due 90 days or more other
than nonaccruing $36 $343 45
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
The Company adopted SFAS No. 114 and No. 118 ACCOUNTING BY CREDITORS FOR
IMPAIRMENT OF A LOAN and ACCOUNTING BY CREDITORS FOR IMPAIRMENT OF A LOAN -
INCOME RECOGNITION AND DISCLOSURES on January 1, 1995. The adoption of SFAS
No. 114 and 118 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial
position or results of operations. Impaired loans totaled $631,000 at
December 31, 1995. An allowance for losses at December 31, 1995, was not
deemed necessary for impaired loans totaling $525,000, but an allowance of
$73,000 was recorded for the remaining balance of impaired loans of $106,000.
The average balance of impaired loans for 1995 was $572,000. Interest
income and cash receipts of interest totaled $47,000 and $37,000 during the
period in 1995 that the loans were impaired.
The Bank has entered into transactions with certain directors, executive
officers, significant stockholders and their affiliates or associates
(related parties). Such transactions were made in the ordinary course of
business on substantially the same terms and conditions, including interest
rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable
transactions with other customers, and did not, in the opinion of management,
involve more than normal credit risk or present other unfavorable features.
The aggregate amount of loans, as defined, to such related parties were as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Balances, January 1 $963 $795
Changes in composition of related parties (442)
New loans, including renewals 84 1,167
Payments, etc., including renewals (96) (999)
-----------------
Balances, December 31 $509 $963
-----------------
-----------------
</TABLE>
On March 19, 1996, the Company charged off $188,000 in loans to a single
borrower. In conjucnction with the chargeoff, a provision for loan losses of
$188,000 was also recorded. These transactions were the result of information
related to the borrower which became available subsequent to December 31, 1995
and discussions with regulatory authorities. Both of these transactions are
reflected in the December 31, 1995 consolidated financial statements.
- --> PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land $ 223 $ 223
Buildings 1,208 1,203
Equipment 511 512
-----------------
Total cost 1,942 1,938
Accumulated depreciation (611) (478)
-----------------
Net $1,331 $1,460
-----------------
-----------------
</TABLE>
F-14
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
DEPOSITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Noninterest bearing $ 7,333 $ 6,538
Interest-bearing demand 9,446 10,464
Savings deposits 9,949 12,981
Certificates and other time deposits of
$100,000 or more 5,476 4,279
Other certificates and time deposits 31,237 34,519
----------------------
Total deposits $63,441 $68,781
----------------------
----------------------
</TABLE>
Certificates maturing in years ending December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1996 $25,555
1997 6,109
1998 4,154
1999 642
2000 253
-------
$36,713
-------
-------
</TABLE>
F-15
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
INCOME TAX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax expense
Currently payable
Federal $196 $188 $339
State 87 88 147
Deferred
Federal (12) 19 (55)
State (4) 8 (21)
------------------------
Total income tax expense $267 $303 $410
------------------------
------------------------
Reconciliation of federal statutory to actual
tax expense
Federal statutory income tax at 34% $318 $376 $492
Tax exempt interest (107) (139) (183)
Effect of state income taxes 55 63 83
Other 1 3 18
------------------------
Actual tax expense $267 $303 $410
------------------------
------------------------
</TABLE>
A cumulative net deferred tax asset is included in other assets. The components
of the asset are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Differences in depreciation methods $(32) $(17)
Differences in accounting for loan losses 187 143
State income tax (14) (13)
Differences in accounting for pensions (19) (2)
Differences in accounting for securities available for sale (25)
Other 5
---------------
$ 102 $111
---------------
---------------
Assets $192 $151
Liabilities (90) (32)
---------------
$ 102 $119
---------------
---------------
</TABLE>
F-16
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In the normal course of business there are outstanding commitments and
contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit, which are not included in the accompanying financial statements. The
Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party
to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those
instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making such commitments
as it does for instruments that are included in the consolidated balance sheet.
Financial instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk as of
December 31 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Commitments to extend credit $2,746 $3,276
Standby letters of credit 55 55
</TABLE>
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as
there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may
require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire
without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer's credit
worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed
necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit is based on management's credit
evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable,
inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
The Company and Bank are also subject to claims and lawsuits which arise
primarily in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management
that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the
Company.
- --> RESTRICTION ON DIVIDENDS
Without prior approval, the Bank is restricted by Indiana law and regulations
of the Department of Financial Institutions, State of Indiana, and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation as to the maximum amount of dividends it can pay
to its parent to the balance of the undivided profits account, adjusted for
defined bad debts. As a practical matter, the Bank restricts dividends to a
lesser amount because of the need to maintain an adequate capital structure.
At December 31, 1995, total stockholders' equity of the Bank was $8,756,000 of
which $6,152,000 was restricted from dividend distribution to the Company.
F-17
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
PENSION PLAN
The Bank's defined-benefit pension plan covers substantially all of its
employees. The benefits are based primarily on years of service and employees'
pay near retirement. Contributions are intended to provide not only for
benefits attributed to service to date, but also for those expected to be earned
in the future. Pension expense was $52,000 for 1995, $77,000 for 1994 and
$50,000 for 1993.
The following tables set forth the plan's funded status and amounts recognized
in the consolidated balance sheet:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of
Accumulated benefit obligation including vested benefits of $1,481
and $1,287
$1,510 $1,309
------------------
------------------
Projected benefit obligation for service rendered to date $(1,890) $(1,591)
Plan assets at fair value, primarily time deposits in financial institutions 1,678 1,411
------------------
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (212) (180)
Unrecognized net loss from experience different than that assumed 211 149
Unrecognized prior service cost 153 158
Unrecognized net asset at January 1, 1987 being recognized over 17
years (108) (123)
------------------
Prepaid pension cost included in other assets $ 44 $ 4
------------------
------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pension expense includes the following components
Service cost - benefits earned during the year $57 $65 $52
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 105 100 98
Actual return on plan assets (246) (6) (21)
Net amortization and deferral 136 (82) (79)
-----------------------------
$52 $77 $50
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
Assumptions used in the accounting were:
Discount rate 6.25% 6.75% 6.00%
Rate of increase in compensation 4.00% 4.00% 4.50%
Expected long-term rate of return on assets 8.00% 7.00% 7.00%
</TABLE>
F-18
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instrument:
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS--The fair value of cash and cash equivalents
approximates carrying value.
INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS--The fair value of interest-bearing time deposits
approximates carrying value.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES--Fair values are based on quoted market prices.
LOANS--For both short-term loans and variable-rate loans that reprice frequently
and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying
values. The fair value for other loans, are estimated using discounted cash
flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with
similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.
INTEREST RECEIVABLE/PAYABLE--The fair values of interest receivable/payable
approximate carrying values.
DEPOSITS--The fair values of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand
accounts are equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date.
Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a
discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being
offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities
on such time deposits.
DUE TO BROKER--The fair value of due to broker approximates carrying value.
The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
-----------------
DECEMBER 31 CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $5,480 $5,480
Interest-bearing deposits 104 104
Investment securities available for sale 22,029 22,029
Loans, net 42,900 42,939
Interest receivable 1,083 1,083
LIABILITIES
Deposits 63,441 63,409
Interest payable 381 381
Due to broker 388 388
</TABLE>
F-19
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
Presented below is condensed financial information as to financial position,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash $ 7 $ 2
Investment in subsidiary 8,756 8,321
Other assets 200 197
---------------------
Total assets $ 8,963 $ 8,520
---------------------
---------------------
LIABILITIES
Dividend payable $ 193 $ 193
Other liabilities 17
---------------------
Total liabilities 210 193
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 8,753 8,327
---------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 8,963 $ 8,520
---------------------
---------------------
</TABLE>
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income--dividends from subsidiary $281 $279 $174
Expense--other expense 18 2 1
---------------------
Income before income tax and equity in
undistributed income of
subsidiary 263 277 173
Income tax benefit 7 1
---------------------
Income before equity in undistributed
income of subsidiary 270 278 173
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary 397 524 899
---------------------
NET INCOME $667 $802 $1,072
---------------------
---------------------
</TABLE>
F-20
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $667 $802 $1,072
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary (397) (524) (899)
Change in
Other assets (3) (101) (4)
Other liabilities 18
---------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 285 177 169
---------------------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash dividends (276) (179) (165)
Purchase of stock (4)
---------------------------
Net cash used by financing activities (280) (179) (165)
---------------------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 5 (2) 4
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 2 4
---------------------------
CASH AT END OF YEAR $ 7 $ 2 $ 4
---------------------------
---------------------------
</TABLE>
F-21
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994
F-22
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Stockholders and
Board of Directors
Union National Bancorp
Liberty, Indiana
We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Union National Bancorp and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements described above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Union
National Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for investments in securities in 1994 and
income taxes in 1993.
GEO. S. OLIVE & CO., LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 2, 1996
F-23
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 3,461,220 $ 3,213,296
Federal funds sold 450,000
----------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents 3,461,220 3,663,296
Investment securities
Available for sale 60,789,224 22,791,661
Held to maturity 2,464,191 30,339,708
----------------------------------
Total investment securities 63,253,415 53,131,369
Loans 89,850,398 83,257,882
Allowance for loan losses (1,144,546) (1,116,077)
----------------------------------
Net loans 88,705,852 82,141,805
Premises and equipment 3,026,917 3,124,478
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock 810,000 800,800
Interest receivable 1,729,585 1,566,387
Other assets 90,546 686,777
----------------------------------
Total assets $161,077,535 $145,114,912
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Noninterest bearing $ 7,805,936 $ 7,795,091
Interest bearing 124,533,486 113,603,118
----------------------------------
Total deposits 132,339,422 121,398,209
Short-term borrowings 3,401,997 1,442,177
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 8,000,000 8,000,000
Interest payable 1,168,093 811,091
Other liabilities 426,739 54,330
----------------------------------
Total liabilities 145,336,251 131,705,807
----------------------------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, $5 stated value
Authorized--200,000 shares
Issued and outstanding--193,968 and 194,302 shares 969,840 971,510
Paid-in capital 1,957,192 1,982,242
Retained earnings 12,118,983 10,867,652
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale 695,269 (412,299)
----------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 15,741,284 13,409,105
----------------------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $161,077,535 $145,114,912
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-24
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Income
Loans receivable $ 7,451,813 $6,509,161 $6,200,780
Investment securities
Taxable 3,000,511 2,253,873 2,292,384
Tax exempt 827,269 894,628 846,576
Trading account securities
Taxable 7,879
Tax exempt 4,100
Federal funds sold 52,622 26,462 12,964
-----------------------------------------------
Total interest income 11,332,215 9,684,124 9,364,683
-----------------------------------------------
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits 6,172,877 4,782,135 4,566,096
Short-term borrowings 128,912 82,680 72,707
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 468,584 462,184 383,209
-----------------------------------------------
Total interest expense 6,770,373 5,326,999 5,022,012
-----------------------------------------------
NET INTEREST INCOME 4,561,842 4,357,125 4,342,671
Provision for loan losses 340,000 300,000 400,000
-----------------------------------------------
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 4,221,842 4,057,125 3,942,671
-----------------------------------------------
OTHER INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts 307,454 263,573 203,378
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities 36,683 12,931 38,281
Trading account securities gains, net 16,699
Other income 118,912 102,724 84,984
-----------------------------------------------
Total other income 463,049 379,228 343,342
-----------------------------------------------
OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits 1,418,349 1,313,166 1,283,705
Premises and equipment expenses 377,682 321,105 286,638
Data processing fees 168,943 168,988 154,609
Deposit insurance expense 142,735 257,073 240,357
Other expenses 509,054 523,821 524,710
-----------------------------------------------
Total other expenses 2,616,763 2,584,153 2,490,019
-----------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN
ACCOUNTING METHOD 2,068,128 1,852,200 1,795,994
Income tax expense 545,125 449,425 444,253
-----------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
METHOD 1,523,003 1,402,775 1,351,741
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN METHOD OF ACCOUNTING FOR
INCOME TAXES 68,848
-----------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 1,523,003 $1,402,775 $1,420,589
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
PER SHARE
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting method $7.85 $7.22 $6.96
Net income $7.85 $7.22 $7.32
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING 194,061 194,302 194,150
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-25
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK
--------------------------------
SHARES PAID-IN
OUTSTANDING AMOUNT CAPITAL
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCES, JANUARY 1, 1993 193,552 $967,760 $1,940,992
Net income for 1993
Cash dividends ($1.10 per share)
Sale of stock 750 3,750 41,250
------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1993 194,302 971,510 1,982,242
Net income for 1994
Cash dividends ($1.20 per share)
Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting for securities,
net of taxes of $182,000
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for
sale, net of taxes of $470,000
------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1994 194,302 971,510 1,982,242
Net income for 1995
Cash dividends ($1.40 per share)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for
sale, net of taxes of $740,000
Purchase of stock (334) (1,670) (25,050)
------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1995 193,968 $969,840 $1,957,192
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
NET
UNREALIZED
GAIN (LOSS)
ON SECURITIES
RETAINED AVAILABLE FOR
EARNINGS SALE TOTAL
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCES, JANUARY 1, 1993 $ 8,491,182 $11,399,934
Net income for 1993 1,420,589 1,420,589
Cash dividends ($1.10 per share) (213,732) (213,732)
Sale of stock 45,000
------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1993 9,698,039 12,651,791
Net income for 1994 1,402,775 1,402,775
Cash dividends ($1.20 per share) (233,162) (233,162)
Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting for securities,
net of taxes of $182,000 $272,568 272,568
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for
sale, net of taxes of $470,000 (684,867) (684,867)
------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1994 10,867,652 (412,299) 13,409,105
Net income for 1995 1,523,003 1,523,003
Cash dividends ($1.40 per share) (271,672) (271,672)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for
sale, net of taxes of $740,000 1,107,568 1,107,568
Purchase of stock (26,720)
------------------------------------------------
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 1995 $12,118,983 $695,269 $15,741,284
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-26
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $1,523,003 $1,402,775 $1,420,589
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities
Provision for loan losses 340,000 300,000 400,000
Depreciation and amortization 205,716 260,650 136,966
Deferred income tax (benefit) 52,432 35,503 (103,098)
Investment securities amortization (accretion), net 209 (26,110) (125,962)
Investment securities gains (36,683) (12,931) (38,281)
Net change in
Trading account securities 74,812
Interest receivable (163,198) (110,108) 236,168
Interest payable 357,002 197,342 (94,293)
Other adjustments 208,040 30,166 (143,509)
-------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 2,486,521 2,077,287 1,763,392
-------------------------------------------------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of securities available for sale (19,320,938) (10,154,162)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale 2,111,062 1,069,377
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale 9,178,784 1,684,439
Purchases of securities held to maturity (1,655,300) (1,065,000) (23,070,644)
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity 358,540
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity 1,089,426 6,444,010 18,708,311
Proceeds from investment securities sales 2,097,993
Net change in loans (6,935,457) (5,353,131) (9,495,633)
Purchases of premises and equipment (108,155) (1,078,980) (267,876)
Purchase of FHLB stock (9,200) (225,900)
Other investing activities 146,703 70,082
-------------------------------------------------
Net cash used by investing activities (15,291,238) (8,532,644) (11,957,767)
-------------------------------------------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in
Noninterest-bearing, interest-bearing and savings deposits (742,089) 351,096 6,256,540
Certificates of deposit 11,683,302 10,249,058 (123,997)
Short-term borrowings 1,959,820 (4,389,165) 2,446,893
FHLB advances 2,000,000 2,000,000
Cash dividends (271,672) (233,162) (213,732)
Stock sold (purchased) (26,720) 45,000
-------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 12,602,641 7,977,827 10,410,704
-------------------------------------------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (202,076) 1,522,470 216,329
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR 3,663,296 2,140,826 1,924,497
-------------------------------------------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR $3,461,220 $3,663,296 $2,140,826
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
Interest paid $6,413,371 $5,129,657 $5,116,305
Income tax paid 326,235 459,372 595,480
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-27
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
- - NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of Union National Bancorp ("Company"), and
its wholly owned subsidiary, Union County National Bank ("Bank"), conform to
generally accepted accounting principles and reporting practices followed by the
banking industry. The more significant of the policies are described below.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company is a bank holding company whose principal activity is the ownership
and management of the Bank. The Bank operates under a national bank charter and
provides full banking services, including trust services. As a national bank,
the Bank is subject to the regulation of the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The Bank generates commercial, mortgage and consumer loans and receives deposits
from customers located primarily in Union, Fayette and Wayne Counties, Indiana
and Butler County, Ohio. The Bank's loans are generally secured by specific
items of collateral including real property, consumer assets and business
assets. Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial
portion of its debtors' ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon
economic conditions in the agricultural industry.
CONSOLIDATION--The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and the Bank after elimination of all material intercompany transactions
and accounts.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES--The Company adopted SFAS 115, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN
INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES, on January 1, 1994.
Trading account securities are held for resale in anticipation of short-term
market movements and are valued at fair value. Gains and losses, both realized
and unrealized, are included in other income.
Debt securities are classified as held to maturity when the Company has the
positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Securities held
to maturity are carried at amortized cost.
Debt securities not classified as held to maturity or included in the trading
account and marketable equity securities not classified as trading are
classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale are carried at
fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported separately through
stockholders' equity, net of tax.
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded as interest
income from securities. Realized gains and losses are recorded as net security
gains (losses). Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the
specific-identification method.
F-28
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
At January 1, 1994, investment and trading account securities with an
approximate carrying value of $15,948,000 and $117,000 were reclassified as
available for sale. This reclassification resulted in an increase in total
stockholders' equity, net of taxes, of $272,600.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 115, investment securities were carried at
cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and discounts, and securities held
for sale and marketable equity securities were carried at the lower of aggregate
cost or market. Realized gains and losses on sales were included in other
income. Unrealized losses on securities held for sale were included in other
income. Unrealized losses on marketable equity securities were charged to
stockholders' equity. Gains and losses on the sale of securities were
determined on the specific-identification method.
LOANS are carried at the principal amount outstanding. Interest income is
accrued on the principal balances of loans, except for installment loans with
add-on interest, for which a method that approximates the level yield method is
used. Loans are placed in a nonaccrual status when the collection of interest
becomes doubtful. Interest income previously accrued but not deemed collectible
is reversed and charged against current income. Interest on these loans is then
recognized as income when collected. Loans are considered impaired when it
becomes probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Interest income on
these loans is recognized as described above depending on the accrual status of
the loan. Certain loan fees and direct costs are being deferred and amortized
as an adjustment of yield on the loans.
DIRECT LEASE FINANCING TRANSACTIONS are accounted for by the finance method.
Under this method, lease income (total lease payments receivable plus the
residual value less the cost of leased equipment) is recognized in decreasing
amounts over the term of the lease, thus providing a level return on the
unrecovered investment.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES is maintained to absorb potential loan losses based on
management's continuing review and evaluation of the loan portfolio and its
judgment as to the impact of economic conditions on the portfolio. The
evaluation by management includes consideration of past loan loss experience,
changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, the current condition and
amount of loans outstanding, and the probability of collecting all amounts due.
Impaired loans are measured by the present value of expected future cash flows,
or the fair value of the collateral of the loan, if collateral dependent.
The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the
economic environment and market conditions. Management believes that, as of
December 31, 1995 the allowance for loan losses is adequate based on information
currently available. A worsening or protracted economic decline in the area
within which the Bank operates would increase the likelihood of additional
losses due to credit and market risks and could create the need for additional
loss reserves.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT are carried at cost net of accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method for premises and the
declining-balance method for equipment based principally on the estimated useful
lives of the assets. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred while
major additions and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on
dispositions are included in current operations.
F-29
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
FEDERAL RESERVE AND FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK are required investments for
institutions that are members of the Federal Reserve (FRB) and Federal Home Loan
Bank (FHLB) system. The required investment in the common stock is based on a
predetermined formula.
INCOME TAX in the consolidated statement of income includes deferred income tax
provisions or benefits for all significant temporary differences in recognizing
income and expenses for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The
Company files consolidated income tax returns with its subsidiary.
EARNINGS PER SHARE have been computed based upon the weighted average common
shares outstanding during each year.
- - RESTRICTION ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Bank is required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or on deposit with
the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve required at December 31, 1995, was
$559,000.
- - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
-------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
DECEMBER 31 COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available for sale
U. S. Treasury $ 7,999 $ 135 $ 8,134
Federal agencies 11,637 202 $ 11 11,828
State and municipal 13,194 809 13 13,990
Mortgage-backed securities 23,422 201 162 23,461
Marketable equity securities 312 31 343
Corporate obligations 3,057 24 3,033
------------------------------------------------------------
Total available for sale 59,621 1,378 210 60,789
------------------------------------------------------------
Held to maturity
State and municipal 380 91 471
Other asset-backed securities 2,084 9 21 2,072
------------------------------------------------------------
Total held to maturity 2,464 100 21 2,543
------------------------------------------------------------
Total investment securities $62,085 $1,478 $231 $63,332
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
F-30
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994
-------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
DECEMBER 31 COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available for sale
U. S. Treasury $ 9,998 $ 128 $ 9,870
Federal agencies 4,495 $ 3 239 4,259
State and municipal 3,174 55 89 3,140
Mortgage-backed securities 3,223 296 2,927
Marketable equity securities 354 8 2 360
Corporate obligations 2,236 2,236
------------------------------------------------------------
Total available for sale 23,480 66 754 22,792
------------------------------------------------------------
Held to maturity
State and municipal 11,031 294 321 11,004
Mortgage-backed securities 17,569 69 905 16,733
Other asset-backed securities 1,740 33 1,707
------------------------------------------------------------
Total held to maturity 30,340 363 1,259 29,444
------------------------------------------------------------
Total investment securities $53,820 $429 $2,013 $52,236
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The amortized cost and fair value of securities held to maturity and available
for sale at December 31, 1995, by contractual maturity, are shown below.
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may
have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
-------------------------------------------------------------
AVAILABLE FOR SALE HELD TO MATURITY
-------------------------------------------------------------
AMORTIZED FAIR AMORTIZED FAIR
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION AT DECEMBER 31 COST VALUE COST VALUE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Within one year $ 5,201 $ 5,223
One to five years 21,590 22,096
Five to ten years 3,089 3,305 $ 187 $ 212
After ten years 6,007 6,360 193 259
------------------------------------------------------------
35,887 36,984 380 471
Mortgage-backed securities 23,422 23,462
Other asset-backed securities 2,084 2,072
Marketable equity securities 312 343
------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $59,621 $60,789 $2,464 $2,543
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Investment securities with a carrying value of $7,905,483 and $2,622,000 were
pledged at December 31, 1995 and 1994 to secure certain deposits, Federal Home
Loan Bank advances and for other purposes as permitted or required by law.
F-31
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
Proceeds from the sales of investment securities available for sale during 1995
and 1994 were $2,111,000 and $1,069,400. Gross losses of $900 and gross gains
of $10,800 were realized on the sales.
Proceeds from sales of investment securities held to maturity during 1993 were
$2,098,000. Gross gains of $38,300 for 1993 were realized on those sales.
During 1995, management inadvertently sold a bond backed by automobile loans
with an amortized cost of $353,568 from the held to maturity investment
portfolio, believing such investment had been classified as a loan and not as a
security. The realized gain on the sale was $4,972. There were no other sales
or transfers from the held to maturity investment portfolio other than the
transfer described below.
On December 12, 1995, the Bank transferred certain securities from held to
maturity to available for sale in accordance with a transition reclassification
allowed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Such securities had a
carrying value of $25,732,000 and a fair value of $26,364,000.
- - LOANS AND ALLOWANCE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Commercial and industrial loans $ 9,960 $ 7,175
Real estate loans (includes $8,896 and $9,288 secured
by farmland) 64,716 61,641
Agricultural production financing and other loans to
farmers 5,344 6,264
Individuals' loans for household and other personal
expenditures 9,332 7,636
Tax-exempt loans 256 220
Lease financing(1) 293 450
----------------------
89,901 83,386
Unearned interest on loans (51) (128)
----------------------
Total loans $89,850 $83,258
----------------------
----------------------
(1)Lease financing
Lease contracts receivable at December 31 $284 $371
Residual value of lease equipment 55 149
Unearned lease income (46) (70)
----------------------
Net investment in direct lease financing $293 $450
----------------------
----------------------
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1995, minimum lease payments receivable in succeeding years were
as follows: $114,000 in 1996, $86,000 in 1997, $57,000 in 1998, $21,000 in 1999
and $6,000 in 2000.
F-32
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for loan losses
Balance, January 1 $1,116 $1,100 $1,078
Provision for losses 340 300 400
Recoveries on loans 37 73 19
Loans charged off (348) (357) (397)
--------------------------------
Balance, December 31 $1,145 $1,116 $1,100
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
</TABLE>
The Company adopted SFAS No. 114 and No. 118 ACCOUNTING BY CREDITORS FOR
IMPAIRMENT OF A LOAN and ACCOUNTING BY CREDITORS FOR IMPAIRMENT OF A LOAN -
INCOME RECOGNITION AND DISCLOSURES on January 1, 1995. Impaired loans totaled
$1,059,000 at December 31, 1995. An allowance for losses at December 31, 1995,
was not deemed necessary for impaired loans totaling $72,600, but an allowance
of $545,000 was recorded for the remaining balance of impaired loans of
$986,400. The average balance of impaired loans for 1995 was $1,219,000.
Interest income and cash receipts of interest totaled $72,000 and $51,000 during
the period in 1995 that the loans were impaired.
In addition, at December 31, 1995, the Company had other nonaccrual loans of
approximately $107,000, for which impairment had not been recognized. If
interest on these loans had been recognized at the original interest rates,
interest income would have increased approximately $4,000 in 1995.
The Company has no commitments to loan additional funds to the borrowers of
impaired or nonaccrual loans.
Nonaccruing and restructured loans totaled $560,000 and $1,719,000 at December
31, 1994 and 1993. Additional interest income of approximately $18,000 for 1994
and $145,000 for 1993 would have been recorded had income on those loans been
considered collectible and accounted for on the accrual basis under the original
terms of the loans.
F-33
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
- - PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land $ 782 $ 782
Buildings 2,490 2,475
Equipment 1,593 1,510
-----------------------
Total cost 4,865 4,767
Accumulated depreciation (1,838) (1,643)
-----------------------
Net $3,027 $3,124
-----------------------
-----------------------
</TABLE>
- - DEPOSITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Noninterest bearing $ 7,806 $ 7,795
Interest-bearing demand 27,284 26,182
Savings deposits 10,442 12,298
Certificates and other time deposits of $100,000 or
more 15,795 11,850
Other certificates and time deposits 71,012 63,273
-------------------------
Total deposits $132,339 $121,398
-------------------------
-------------------------
</TABLE>
Certificates, including other time deposits of $100,000 or more, maturing in
years ending December 31:
<TABLE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
1996 $46,633
1997 23,107
1998 8,781
1999 4,466
2000 1,933
Thereafter 1,887
----------------
$86,807
----------------
----------------
</TABLE>
F-34
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
- - SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Federal funds purchased $1,600
Securities sold under repurchase agreements 1,594 $1,234
U. S. Treasury demand notes 208 208
----------------------
Total short-term borrowings $3,402 $1,442
----------------------
----------------------
</TABLE>
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consist of obligations of the
Bank to other parties. The obligations are secured by U. S. Treasury and
Federal agency obligations and such collateral is held by the Federal Reserve
Bank of Chicago. The following table summarizes certain information on these
repurchase agreements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Book value $1,594 $1,234
Collateral book value 4,954 2,738
Collateral market value 4,954 2,738
Average balance of agreements during year 1,804 1,307
Highest month-end balance during year 3,427 1,634
Interest payable at end of year 4 3
Weighted average interest rate at end of year 4.58% 3.58%
</TABLE>
- - FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
Advances from FHLB at December 31.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
-----------------------------------------------
MATURITIES IN YEARS ENDING INTEREST INTEREST
DECEMBER 31 AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT RATE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996 $1,000 8.10% $1,000 8.10%
1996 1,000 8.40 1,000 8.40
1996 1,000 5.33 1,000 5.33
1996 1,000 4.70 1,000 4.70
1997 2,000 4.76 2,000 4.76
1998 2,000 5.29 2,000 5.29
---------- ----------
Total advances $8,000 $8,000
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
F-35
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
The terms of a security agreement with the FHLB require the Company to pledge as
collateral for advances both qualifying first mortgage loans in an amount equal
to at least 170 percent of these advances. Advances are subject to restrictions
or penalties in the event of prepayment.
- - INCOME TAX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31 1995 1994 1993
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax expense
Currently payable
Federal $325 $277 $333
State 168 136 145
Deferred
Federal 44 18 (41)
State 8 18 7
-----------------------------------------------
Total income tax expense $545 $449 $444
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Reconciliation of federal statutory to actual tax expense
Federal statutory income
tax at 34% $703 $630 $611
Tax exempt interest (253) (279) (266)
Effect of state income taxes 117 102 100
Other (22) (4) (1)
-----------------------------------------------
Actual tax expense $545 $449 $444
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Tax expense applicable to security gains for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1994, and 1993 was $14,700, $5,200, and $15,300, respectively.
F-36
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
A cumulative deferred liability for 1995 and tax asset for 1994 is included in
other liabilities for 1995 and other assets for 1994. The components of the
(liability) asset are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Differences in depreciation methods $(190) $(172)
Accretion of investments discounts (5) (13)
Differences in accounting for loan fees (4) 25
Differences in accounting for loan losses 281 270
State income tax (18) (21)
Differences in accounting for leases (15) 2
Alternative minimum tax credit carryover 123 133
Net unrealized (gain) loss on securities
available for sale (464) 276
-----------------------------------------------
$(292) $ 500
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Assets $404 $706
Liabilities (696) (206)
-----------------------------------------------
$(292) $500
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
No valuation allowance was considered necessary at December 31, 1995.
The alternative minimum tax credit carryover is available to offset future
regular federal income tax liabilities and has an unlimited carryover period.
During 1993, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Standards No. 109,
ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES. As a result, the beginning deferred tax asset was
increased by $68,848, which is reported as the cumulative effect of a change in
accounting method.
- - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In the normal course of business there are outstanding commitments and
contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit, which are not included in the accompanying financial statements. The
Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other
party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those
instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making such
commitments as it does for instruments that are included in the consolidated
balance sheet.
F-37
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
Financial instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk as of
December 31 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Commitments to extend credit $5,545 $5,199
Standby letters of credit 363 233
</TABLE>
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as
there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may
require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire
without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer's
credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if
deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit is based on
management's credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts
receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial
properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
The Company and Bank are also subject to claims and lawsuits which arise
primarily in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management
that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the
Company.
- - RESTRICTION ON BANK DIVIDENDS
Without prior approval of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Bank is
restricted by national banking laws as to the maximum amount of dividends it can
pay to the parent in any calendar year to the Bank's retained net profits (as
defined) for that year and the two preceding years. The amount at December 31,
1995 available for 1996 dividends to the Company was $2,375,000. As a practical
matter, the Bank restricts dividends to a lesser amount because of the need to
maintain an adequate capital structure. Total equity capital of the Bank at
December 31, 1995 was $15,445,000 of which $13,070,000 was restricted from
dividend distribution to the Company.
- - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan in which substantially all
employees may participate. The Company matches employees' contributions at the
rate of 30 per cent for the first 6 per cent of base salary contributed by
participants. The Company's expense for the plan was $13,100 for 1995, $13,400
for 1994 and $12,400 for 1993.
F-38
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
The Company also has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan covering substantially all
of its employees. The cost of the plan is borne by the Company through
contributions to an Employee Stock Ownership Trust in amounts determined by the
Board of Directors. The contributions to the plan in 1995, 1994 and 1993 were
$79,000, $70,300 and $69,200, respectively.
- - FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instrument:
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS--The fair value of cash and cash equivalents
approximates carrying value.
SECURITIES AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES--Fair values are based on quoted
market prices.
LOANS--The fair values for loans are estimated using discounted cash flow
analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar
terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.
INTEREST RECEIVABLE/PAYABLE--The fair values of interest receivable/payable
approximate carrying values.
FRB AND FHLB STOCK--Fair value of FRB and FHLB stock is based on the price at
which it may be resold to the FRB and FHLB.
DEPOSITS--The fair values of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand
accounts are equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date.
Fair values for certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash
flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on
certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on such
time deposits.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES--The fair value of these borrowings are
estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation, based on current rates for
similar debt.
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS--Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase
agreements and U. S. Treasury demand notes are short-term borrowing
arrangements. The rates at December 31, 1995, approximate market rates, thus
the fair values approximate carrying values.
F-39
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
-----------------------------------------------
CARRYING FAIR
DECEMBER 31 AMOUNT VALUE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,461 $ 3,461
Securities available for sale 60,789 60,789
Securities held to maturity 2,464 2,543
Loans 89,850 88,838
Interest receivable 1,730 1,730
Stock in FRB and FHLB 810 810
LIABILITIES
Deposits 132,339 132,640
Short-term borrowings 3,402 3,402
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 8,000 7,976
Interest payable 1,168 1,168
</TABLE>
- - SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 24, 1996, the Company signed a definitive agreement to merge with
First Merchants Corporation of Muncie, Indiana (First Merchants). Under terms
of the agreement, shareholders will receive 4.86 shares of First Merchants stock
for each share of the Company's common stock owned. The transaction is subject
to approval by the Company's stockholders and regulatory agencies. Although the
Company anticipates that the merger will be consummated during the second
quarter of 1996, there can be no assurance that the acquisition will be
completed.
F-40
<PAGE>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
- - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
Presented below is condensed financial information as to financial position,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31 1995 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C>
Cash on deposit $ 35 $ 19
Investment securities available for sale 92 110
Investment in subsidiary 15,445 13,087
Premises and equipment, net 189 198
------------------------
Total assets $ 15,761 $ 13,414
------------------------
------------------------
LIABILITIES--income taxes $ 20 $ 4
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 15,741 13,410
-----------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 15,761 $ 13,414
------------------------
------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME
December 31 1995 1994 1993
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Dividends from subsidiary $ 240 $ 280 $ 220
Interest and dividend income on securities 6 8 13
Securities gains 20 9 17
Other income 25 6
-------------------------
Total income 291 303 250
Expenses 18 12 10
-------------------------
Income before income tax and equity in undistributed
income of subsidiary 273 291 240
Income tax expense 11 2 4
-------------------------
Income before equity in undistributed income of
subsidiary 262 289 236
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary 1,261 1,114 1,185
-------------------------
NET INCOME $ 1,523 $1,403 $1,421
-------------------------
-------------------------
</TABLE>
F-41
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNION NATIONAL BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABLE DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 1995 1994 1993
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income $ 1,523 $ 1,403 $ 1,421
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary (1,261) (1,114) (1,185)
Depreciation 9 5
Securities accretion, net (3)
Securities gains (20) (9)
Net change in other assets 1
Net change in trading account securities 75
Net change in other liabilities 10 2
-----------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 261 282 314
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available for sale (59) (43)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale 113 68
Purchase of premises and equipment (203)
-----------------------------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 54 (178)
-----------------------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash dividends (272) (233) (214)
Stock purchase (27) 45
------------------------------
Net cash used by financing activities (299) (233) (169)
------------------------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH 16 (129) 145
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 19 148 3
------------------------------
CASH AT END OF YEAR $ 35 $ 19 $ 148
------------------------------
------------------------------
</TABLE>
F-42
<PAGE>
APPENDIX A
AGREEMENT OF REORGANIZATION AND MERGER
BETWEEN
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
AND
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
THIS AGREEMENT OF REORGANIZATION AND MERGER ("Agreement"), is entered this
17th day of January, 1996, by and between FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION ("First
Merchants") and RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP ("Randolph County").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, First Merchants is a corporation duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Indiana and a registered bank holding company under the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, with its principal place of
business in Muncie, Delaware County, Indiana.
WHEREAS, Randolph County is a corporation duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Indiana and a registered bank holding company under the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, with its principal place of
business in Winchester, Randolph County, Indiana.
WHEREAS, The Randolph County Bank (the "Bank") is a banking institution
duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Randolph County with its principal banking office in
Winchester, Randolph County, Indiana.
WHEREAS, it is the desire of First Merchants and Randolph County to effect
a transaction whereby the Bank will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of First
Merchants through a statutory merger of Randolph County with and into First
Merchants.
WHEREAS, a majority of the entire Board of Directors of First Merchants and
a majority of the entire Board of Directors of Randolph County have approved
this Agreement, designated it as a plan of reorganization within the provisions
of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), and authorized its execution.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and
agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, First Merchants and Randolph County
hereby make this Agreement and prescribe the terms and conditions of the merger
of Randolph County with and into First Merchants and the mode of carrying the
transaction into effect as follows:
SECTION 1
THE MERGER
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, on the Effective
Date, as defined in Section 11 hereof, Randolph County shall be merged into and
under the Articles of Incorporation of First Merchants, which shall be the
"Continuing Company" and which shall continue its corporate existence under the
A-1
<PAGE>
laws of the State of Indiana, pursuant to the provisions of and with the effect
provided in the Indiana Business Corporation Law and particularly Indiana Code
chapter 23-1-40 (the "Merger").
SECTION 2
EFFECT OF THE MERGER
Upon the Merger becoming effective:
2.01. GENERAL DESCRIPTION. The separate existence of Randolph County
shall cease and the Continuing Company shall possess all of the assets of
Randolph County including all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital
stock of the Bank and all of its rights, privileges, immunities, powers, and
franchises and shall be subject to and assume all of the duties and liabilities
of Randolph County.
2.02. NAME, OFFICES, AND MANAGEMENT. The name of the Continuing Company
shall continue to be "First Merchants Corporation." Its principal banking
office shall be located at 200 E. Jackson Street, Muncie, Indiana. The Board of
Directors of the Continuing Company, until such time as their successors have
been elected and qualified, shall consist of the current Board of Directors of
First Merchants. The officers of First Merchants immediately prior to the
Effective Date shall continue as the officers of the Continuing Company.
2.03. CAPITAL STRUCTURE. The amount of capital stock of the Continuing
Company shall not be less than the capital stock of First Merchants immediately
prior to the Effective Date increased by the amount of capital stock issued in
accordance with Section 3 hereof.
2.04. ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS. The Articles of Incorporation
and Bylaws of the Continuing Company shall be those of First Merchants
immediately prior to the Effective Date until the same shall be further amended
as provided by law.
2.05. ASSETS AND LIABILITIES. The title to all assets, real estate and
other property owned by First Merchants and Randolph County shall vest in the
Continuing Company without reversion or impairment. All liabilities of Randolph
County shall be assumed by the Continuing Company.
SECTION 3
CONSIDERATION TO BE
DISTRIBUTED TO SHAREHOLDERS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY
3.01. CONSIDERATION. Upon and by reason of the Merger becoming effective,
shareholders of Randolph County of record on the Effective Date who have not
dissented to the Merger in accordance with Indiana Code Section 23-1-44, as
amended, shall be entitled to receive twenty and 53/100 (20.53) shares of First
Merchants common stock for each share of Randolph County common stock held.
3.02. NO FRACTIONAL FIRST MERCHANTS COMMON SHARES. Certificates for
fractional shares of common stock of First Merchants shall not be issued in
respect of fractional interests arising from the exchange ratio. Each Randolph
County shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a
First Merchants share, upon surrender of all of his/her certificates
representing Randolph County common shares, shall be paid in cash in an amount
equal to the fraction of the average of the closing price of First Merchants
common stock as quoted by NASDAQ for the five business days preceding the
Effective Date.
A-2
<PAGE>
3.03. RECAPITALIZATION. If, between the date of this Agreement and the
Effective Date, First Merchants issues a stock dividend with respect to its
shares of common stock, combines, subdivides, or splits up its outstanding
shares or takes any similar recapitalization action, then the number of shares
of First Merchants common stock into which each outstanding Randolph County
share will be converted under Section 3.01 hereof shall be adjusted so that each
Randolph County shareholder shall receive such number of First Merchants shares
as represents the same percentage of outstanding shares of First Merchants
common stock at the Effective Date as would have been represented by the number
of shares such shareholder would have received if the recapitalization had not
occurred.
3.04. DISTRIBUTION OF FIRST MERCHANTS COMMON STOCK AND CASH.
(a) Following the Effective Date, distribution of stock certificates
representing First Merchants common stock and cash payments for fractional
shares shall be made by First Merchants to each former shareholder of
Randolph County within ten (10) days of such shareholder's delivery of
his/her certificates representing common stock of Randolph County to the
conversion agent, First Merchants Bank (the "Conversion Agent"). Interest
shall not accrue or be payable with respect to any cash payments.
(b) Following the Effective Date, stock certificates representing
Randolph County common stock shall be deemed to evidence only the right to
receive ownership of First Merchants common stock (for all corporate
purposes other than the payment of dividends) and cash for fractional
shares, as applicable. No dividends or other distributions otherwise
payable subsequent to the Effective Date on stock of First Merchants shall
be paid to any shareholder entitled to receive the same until such
shareholder has surrendered his/her certificates for Randolph County common
stock to the Conversion Agent in exchange for certificates representing
First Merchants common stock and cash. Upon surrender, there shall be paid
to the recordholder of the new certificate(s) evidencing shares of First
Merchants common stock, the amount of all dividends and other
distributions, without interest thereon, withheld with respect to such
common stock.
(c) First Merchants shall be entitled to rely upon the stock transfer
books of Randolph County to establish the persons entitled to receive cash
and shares of common stock of First Merchants, which books, in the absence
of actual knowledge by First Merchants of any adverse claim thereto, shall
be conclusive with respect to the ownership of such stock.
(d) With respect to any certificate for shares of Randolph County
common stock which has been lost, stolen, or destroyed, First Merchants
shall be authorized to issue common stock to the registered owner of such
certificate upon receipt of an affidavit of lost stock certificate, in form
and substance satisfactory to First Merchants, and upon compliance by the
Randolph County shareholder with all procedures historically required by
Randolph County in connection with lost, stolen, or destroyed certificates.
SECTION 4
DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
Shareholders of Randolph County shall have the rights accorded to
dissenting shareholders under Indiana Code Section 23-1-44, as amended.
A-3
<PAGE>
SECTION 5
REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES OF RANDOLPH COUNTY
Randolph County represents and warrants to First Merchants with respect to
itself and the Bank as follows: (For the purposes of this Section, a
"Disclosure Letter" is defined as a letter referencing Section 5 of this
Agreement which shall be prepared and executed by an authorized executive
officer of Randolph County and delivered to and initialed by an authorized
executive officer of First Merchants contemporaneous with the execution of this
Agreement.)
5.01. ORGANIZATION AND AUTHORITY. Randolph County is a corporation duly
organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Indiana, and Bank
is a state banking association duly organized and validly existing under the
laws of the State of Indiana. Randolph County and Bank have the power and
authority (corporate and other) to conduct their respective businesses in the
manner and by the means utilized as of the date hereof. Randolph County's only
subsidiary is Bank, and Bank has no subsidiaries. Bank is subject to primary
federal regulatory supervision and regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation.
5.02. AUTHORIZATION.
(a) Randolph County has the corporate power and authority to enter
into this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder. This
Agreement, when executed and delivered, will have been duly authorized and
will constitute a valid and binding obligation of Randolph County,
enforceable in accordance with its terms except to the extent limited by
insolvency, reorganization, liquidation, readjustment of debt or other laws
of general application relating to or affecting the enforcement of
creditors' rights.
(b) Neither the execution of this Agreement, nor the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby, does or will (i) conflict with,
result in a breach of, or constitute a default under Randolph County's
Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws or, to the best of its knowledge, any
federal, foreign, state or local law, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation
or court or administrative order or decree, or any note, bond, indenture,
mortgage, security agreement, contract, arrangement or commitment, to which
Randolph County or Bank is subject or bound, the result of which would
materially affect the business or financial condition of Randolph County or
the Bank; (ii) result in the creation of or give any person the right to
create any lien, charge, encumbrance, security interest, or any other
rights of others or other adverse interest upon any right, property or
asset of Randolph County or Bank; (iii) terminate or give any person,
corporation or entity, the right to terminate, amend, abandon, or refuse to
perform any note, bond, indenture, mortgage, security agreement, contract,
arrangement or commitment to which Randolph County or Bank is subject or
bound; or (iv) accelerate or modify, or give any party thereto the right to
accelerate or modify, the time within which, or the terms according to
which, Randolph County is to perform any duties or obligations or receive
any rights or benefits under any note, bond, indenture, mortgage, security
agreement, contract, arrangement or commitment.
(c) Other than in connection or in compliance with the provisions of
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, federal and state securities laws and
applicable Indiana banking and corporate statutes, all as amended, and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, no notice to, filing with,
authorization of, exemption by, or consent or approval of, any
A-4
<PAGE>
public body or authority is necessary for the consummation by Randolph
County of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
5.03. CAPITALIZATION.
(a) As of December 31, 1995, Randolph County had 60,000 shares of
common stock authorized, no par value per share, 27,555 shares of which
were issued and outstanding. Such issued and outstanding shares of
Randolph County common stock have been duly and validly authorized by all
necessary corporate action of Randolph County, are validly issued, fully
paid and nonassessable and have not been issued in violation of any
preemptive rights of any shareholders. Randolph County has no intention or
obligation to authorize or issue additional shares of its common stock.
Randolph County has not authorized the issuance of any other class of
stock. On a consolidated basis as of December 31, 1995, Randolph County
had total capital of $8,902,996, which consisted of common stock of
$2,755,500, additional capital of $709,036, retained earnings of
$5,399,994, and unrealized gain of $38,466.
(b) As of December 31, 1995, Bank had 1,000 shares of common stock
authorized, $100.00 par value per share, all of which shares were issued
and outstanding to Randolph County. Such issued and outstanding shares of
Bank common stock have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary
corporate action of Bank, are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable,
and have not been issued in violation of any preemptive rights of any Bank
shareholders. All the issued and outstanding shares of Bank common stock
are owned by Randolph County free and clear of all liens, pledges, charges,
claims, encumbrances, restrictions, security interests, options and
preemptive rights and of all other rights of any other person, corporation
or entity with respect thereto. As of December 31, 1995, Bank had total
capital of $8,906,739, which consisted of common stock of $100,000, capital
surplus of $2,500,000, undivided profits of $6,268,273, and unrealized gain
of $38,466.
(c) There are no options, commitments, calls, agreements,
understandings, arrangements or subscription rights regarding the issuance,
purchase or acquisition of capital stock, or any securities convertible
into or representing the right to purchase or otherwise receive the capital
stock or any debt securities, of Randolph County or Bank by which Randolph
County or Bank is or may become bound. Neither Randolph County or Bank has
any outstanding contractual or other obligation to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any of its respective outstanding shares of capital
stock.
(d) Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter, no person or entity
beneficially owns 5% or more of Randolph County's outstanding shares of
common stock.
5.04. ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENTS. The respective Articles of Incorporation
or Association and By-Laws of Randolph County and Bank have been delivered to
First Merchants and represent true, accurate and complete copies of such
corporate documents of Randolph County and Bank in effect as of the date of this
Agreement.
5.05. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. Neither Randolph County nor Bank has engaged
in any activity nor taken or omitted to take any action which has resulted or,
to the knowledge of Randolph County could result, in the violation of any local,
state, federal or foreign law, statute, rule, regulation or ordinance or of any
order, injunction, judgment or decree of any court or government agency or body,
the violation of which could materially affect the business, prospects,
condition (financial or otherwise) or results of operations of Randolph County
or Bank. Randolph County and Bank possess all licenses, franchises, permits and
other
A-5
<PAGE>
authorizations necessary for the continued conduct of their respective
businesses without material interference or interruption and such licenses,
franchises, permits and authorizations shall be transferred to First Merchants
on the Effective Date without any restrictions or limitations thereon or the
need to obtain any consents of third parties. All agreements and understandings
with, and all orders and directives of, all regulatory agencies or government
authorities with respect to the business or operations of Randolph County or
Bank, including all correspondence, communications and commitments related
thereto, are set forth in the Disclosure Letter. Bank has received no inquiries
from any regulatory agency or government authority relating to its compliance
with the Bank Secrecy Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act or the Community
Reinvestment Act or any laws with respect to the protection of the environment
or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
5.06. ACCURACY OF STATEMENTS. Neither this Agreement nor any report,
statement, list, certificate or other information furnished or to be furnished
by Randolph County or Bank to First Merchants in connection with this Agreement
or any of the transactions contemplated hereby (including, without limitation,
any information which has been or shall be supplied by Randolph County or Bank
with respect to their businesses, operations and financial condition for
inclusion in the proxy statement and registration statement relating to the
Merger) contains or shall contain (in the case of information relating to the
proxy statement at the time it is mailed and for the registration statement at
the time it becomes effective) any untrue statement of a material fact or omits
or shall omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
contained herein or therein not misleading.
5.07. LITIGATION AND PENDING PROCEEDINGS. Except as set forth in the
Disclosure Letter, there are no material claims of any kind, nor any material
action, suits, proceedings, arbitrations or investigations pending or to the
knowledge of Randolph County or Bank threatened in any court or before any
government agency or body, arbitration panel or otherwise (nor does Randolph
County or Bank have any knowledge of a basis for any claim, action, suit,
proceeding, arbitration or investigation) against, by or materially adversely
affecting Randolph County or Bank or their respective officers and/or directors,
businesses, prospects, conditions (financial or otherwise), results of
operations or assets, or which would prevent the performance of this Agreement
or declare the same unlawful or cause the rescission hereof. There are no
material uncured violations, or violations with respect to which material
refunds or restitutions may be required, cited in any compliance report to
Randolph County or Bank as a result of an examination by any regulatory agency
or body.
5.08. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
(a) Randolph County's consolidated balance sheets as of the end of
the three fiscal years ended December 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994 and the nine
months ended September 30, 1995 and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years or period then
ended (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Financial Information")
present fairly the consolidated financial condition or position of Randolph
County as of the respective dates thereof and the consolidated results of
operations of Randolph County for the respective periods covered thereby
and have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles applied on a consistent basis. All required regulatory reports
have been filed by Randolph County and Bank with their respective primary
federal regulators during 1995, 1994, 1993 and 1992, are true, accurate and
complete and were prepared in conformity with generally accepted regulatory
accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.
(b) All loans reflected in the Financial Information and which have
been made, extended or acquired since September 30, 1995, (i) have been
A-6
<PAGE>
made for good, valuable and adequate consideration in the ordinary course
of business; (ii) constitute the legal, valid and binding obligation of the
obligor and any guarantor named therein; (iii) are evidenced by notes,
instruments or other evidences of indebtedness which are true, genuine and
what they purport to be; and (iv) to the extent that Bank has a security
interest in collateral or a mortgage securing such loans, are secured by
perfected security interests or mortgages naming Bank as the secured party
or mortgagee.
5.09. ABSENCE OF CERTAIN CHANGES. Except for events and conditions
relating to the business environment in general or as set forth in the
Disclosure Letter, since September 30, 1995, no events or conditions of any
character, whether actual, threatened or contemplated, have occurred, or, to the
knowledge of Randolph County, can reasonably be expected to occur, which
materially adversely affect Randolph County's or Bank's business, prospects,
conditions (financial or otherwise), assets or results of operations or which
have caused, or can reasonably be expected to cause, Randolph County's or Bank's
business to be conducted in a materially less profitable manner than prior to
September 30, 1995.
5.10. ABSENCE OF UNDISCLOSED LIABILITIES. Neither Randolph County nor
Bank is a party to any agreement, contract, obligation, commitment, arrangement,
liability, lease or license which individually exceeds $10,000 per year or which
may not be terminated within one year from the date of this Agreement, except as
set forth in the Disclosure Letter and except for unfunded loan commitments made
in the ordinary course of Bank's business consistent with past practices, nor to
the knowledge of Randolph County, does there exist any circumstances resulting
from transactions effected or to be effected or events which have occurred or
may occur or from any action taken or omitted to be taken which could reasonably
be expected to result in any such agreement, contract, obligation, commitment,
arrangement, liability, lease or license.
5.11. TITLE TO ASSETS. Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter,
Randolph County and Bank have good and marketable title in fee simple absolute
to all real property (including, without limitation, all real property used as
bank holding company or bank premises and all other real estate owned) and
personal property reflected in the Financial Information as of September 30,
1995, good and marketable title to all other properties and assets which
Randolph County or Bank purport to own, good and marketable title to or right to
use by terms of lease or contract all other property used in Randolph County's
or Bank's business and good and marketable title to all property and assets
acquired since September 30, 1995, free and clear of all mortgages, liens,
pledges, restrictions, security interests, charges, claims or encumbrances of
any nature. All real property owned by Randolph County or Bank is in compliance
with all applicable zoning laws and all laws, statutes, rules, regulations and
ordinances relating to the environment, pollution and the treatment, storage,
disposal, discharge or release of chemicals and hazardous or toxic substances or
wastes.
5.12. LOANS AND INVESTMENTS.
(a) Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter, there is no loan of
Bank in excess of $10,000 that has been classified by bank regulatory
examiners as "Other Loans Specially Mentioned," "Substandard," "Doubtful"
or "Loss," nor is there any loan of Bank in excess of $10,000 that has been
identified by accountants or auditors (internal or external) as having a
significant risk of uncollectibility. Bank's loan watch list and all loans
in excess if $10,000 that Bank's management has determined to be ninety
(90) days or more past due with respect to principal or interest or has
placed on nonaccrual status are set forth in the Disclosure Letter.
A-7
<PAGE>
(b) Each of the reserves and allowances for possible loan losses and
the carrying value for real estate owned which are shown on the Financial
Information is, in the opinion of Randolph County and Bank, adequate in all
material respects under the requirements of generally accepted accounting
principles applied on a consistent basis to provide for possible losses on
loans outstanding and real estate owned as of the date of such Financial
Information.
(c) Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter, none of the
investments reflected in the Financial Information and none of the
investments made by Randolph County or Bank since September 30, 1995 is
subject to any restrictions, whether contractual or statutory, which
materially impairs the ability of Randolph County or Bank to dispose freely
of such investment at any time. Except as set forth in the Disclosure
Letter, neither Randolph County nor Bank are a party to any repurchase
agreements with respect to securities.
5.13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS.
(a) The Disclosure Letter contains a list identifying each "employee
benefit plan," as defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), which (i) is subject to any
provision of ERISA, and (ii) is maintained, administered or contributed to
by Randolph County or Bank and covers any employee or former employee of
Randolph County or Bank under which Randolph County or Bank has any
liability. Copies of such plans (and, if applicable, related trust
agreements or insurance contracts) and all amendments thereto and written
interpretations thereof have been furnished to First Merchants together
with the three most recent annual reports prepared in connection with any
such plan and the current summary plan descriptions. Such plans are
hereinafter referred to individually as an "Employee Plan" and collectively
as the "Employee Plans." The Employee Plans which individually or
collectively would constitute an "employee pension benefit plan" as defined
in Section 3(2) of ERISA are identified in the list referred to above.
(b) The Employee Plans comply with and have been operated in
accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, rulings and other
requirements the breach or violation of which could materially affect
Randolph County, Bank, or an Employee Plan. Each Employee Plan has been
administered in substantial conformance with such requirements and all
reports and information required with respect to each Employee Plan has
been timely given.
(c) No "prohibited transaction," as defined in Section 406 of ERISA
or Section 4975 of the Code, for which no statutory or administrative
exemption exists, and no "reportable event," as defined in Section 4043(b)
of ERISA, has occurred with respect to any Employee Plan. Neither Randolph
County or Bank has any liability to the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation ("PBGC"), to the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), to the
Department of Labor ("DOL") or to an employee or Employee Plan beneficiary
under Section 502 of ERISA.
(d) No "fiduciary," as defined in Section (3)(21) of ERISA, of an
Employee Plan has failed to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of
ERISA.
(e) Each of the Employee Plans which is intended to be qualified
under Code Section 401(a) has been amended to comply in all material
respects with the applicable requirements of the Code, including the Tax
Reform Act of 1986, the Revenue Act of 1987, the Technical and
Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act
A-8
<PAGE>
of 1989, the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990, the Tax Extension Act of
1991, the Unemployment Compensation Amendments of 1992, the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, and the Retirement Protection Act of
1994 and any rules, regulations or other requirements promulgated
thereunder (the "Acts"). In addition, each such Employee Plan has been
and is being operated in substantial conformance with the applicable
provisions of ERISA and the Code, as amended by the Acts. Except as set
forth in the Disclosure Letter, Randolph County and/or Bank, as
applicable, sought and received favorable determination letters from the
IRS within the applicable remedial amendment periods under Code Section
401(b), and has furnished to First Merchants copies of the most recent
IRS determination letters with respect to any such Employee Plan.
(f) Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter, no Employee Plan
owns any security of Randolph County or Bank.
(g) No Employee Plan has incurred an "accumulated funding
deficiency," as determined under Code Section 412 and ERISA Section 302.
(h) No Employee Plan has been terminated or incurred a partial
termination (either voluntarily or involuntarily).
(i) No claims against an Employee Plan, Randolph County or Bank, with
respect to an Employee Plan, (other than normal benefit claims) have been
asserted or threatened.
(j) There is no contract, agreement, plan or arrangement covering any
employee or former employee of Randolph County or Bank that, individually
or collectively, could give rise to the payment of any amount that would
not be deductible by reason of Section 280G or Section 162(a)(1) of the
Code.
(k) No event has occurred that would cause the imposition of the tax
described in Code Section 4980B. All requirements of ERISA Section 601
have been met.
(l) The Disclosure Letter contains a list of each employment,
severance or other similar contract, arrangement or policy and each plan or
arrangement (written or oral) providing for insurance coverage (including
any self-insured arrangements), workers' compensation, disability benefits,
supplemental unemployment benefits, vacation benefits, retirement benefits
or deferred compensation, profit sharing, bonuses, stock options, stock
appreciation or other forms of incentive compensation or post-retirement
insurance, compensation or benefits which (i) is not an Employee Plan, (ii)
was entered into, maintained or contributed to, as the case may be, by
Randolph County or Bank and (iii) covers any employee or former employee of
Randolph County or Bank. Such contracts, plans and arrangements as are
described above, copies or descriptions of all of which have been furnished
previously to First Merchants, are hereinafter referred to collectively as
the "Benefit Arrangements." Each of the Benefit Arrangements has been
maintained in substantial compliance with its terms and with the
requirements prescribed by any and all statutes, orders, rules and
regulations which are applicable to such Benefit Arrangements.
(m) Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter, neither Randolph
County nor Bank has any present or future liability in respect of
post-retirement health and medical benefits for former employees of
Randolph County or Bank.
(n) Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter, there has been no
amendment to, written interpretation or announcement (whether or not
A-9
<PAGE>
written) by Randolph County or Bank relating to, or change in employee
participation or coverage under, any Employee Plan or Benefit Arrangement
which would increase materially the expense of maintaining such Employee
Plans or Benefit Arrangements above the level of the expense incurred in
respect thereof for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.
(o) For purposes of this Section 5.13, references to Randolph County
or Bank are deemed to include (i) all predecessors of Randolph County or
Bank, (ii) any subsidiary of Randolph County or Bank, (iii) all members of
any controlled group (as determined under Code Section 414(b) or (c)) that
includes Randolph County or Bank, and (iv) all members of any affiliated
service group (as determined under Code Section 414(m) or (n)) that
includes Randolph County or Bank.
5.14 OBLIGATIONS TO EMPLOYEES. Except as set forth in the Disclosure
Letter, all accrued obligations and liabilities of Randolph County and Bank,
whether arising by operation of law, by contract or by past custom, for payments
to trust or other funds, to any government agency or body or to any individual
director, officer, employee or agent (or his heirs, legatees or legal
representative) with respect to unemployment compensation or social security
benefits and all pension, retirement, savings, stock purchase, stock bonus,
stock ownership, stock option, stock appreciation rights or profit sharing plan,
any employment, deferred compensation, consultant, bonus or collective
bargaining agreement or group insurance contract or other incentive, welfare or
employee benefit plan or agreement maintained by Randolph County or Bank for
their current or former directors, officers, employees and agents have been and
are being paid to the extent required by law or by the plan or contract, and
adequate actuarial accruals and/or reserves for such payments have been and are
being made by Randolph County or Bank in accordance with generally accepted
accounting and actuarial principles. All obligations and liabilities of
Randolph County and Bank, whether arising by operation of law, by contract, or
by past custom, for all forms of compensation which are or may be payable to
their current or former directors, officers, employees or agents have been and
are being paid, and adequate accruals and/or reserves for payment therefor have
been and are being made in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. All accruals and reserves referred to in this Section 5.14, are
correctly and accurately reflected and accounted for in the books, statements
and records of Randolph County and Bank.
5.15. TAXES, RETURNS AND REPORTS. Randolph County and Bank have (a) duly
filed all federal, state, local and foreign tax returns of every type and kind
required to be filed as of the date hereof, and each return is true, complete
and accurate in all material respects; (b) paid in all materials respects all
taxes, assessments and other governmental charges due or claimed to be due upon
them or any of their income, properties or assets; and (c) not requested an
extension of time for any such payments (which extension is still in force).
Except for taxes not yet due and payable, the reserve for taxes on the Financial
Information is adequate to cover all of Randolph County's and Bank's tax
liabilities (including, without limitation, income taxes and franchise fees)
that may become payable in future years with respect to any transactions
consummated prior to December 31, 1994. Neither Randolph County nor Bank has or
will have, any liability for taxes of any nature for or with respect to the
operation of their business, including the assets of any subsidiary, from
December 31, 1994 up to and including the Effective Date, except to the extent
reflected on their Financial Information or on financial statements of Randolph
County or Bank subsequent to such date and as set forth in the Disclosure
Letter. Neither Randolph County nor Bank is currently under audit by any state
or federal taxing authority. Except as set forth in the Disclosure Letter,
neither the federal, state, or local tax returns of Randolph County or Bank have
been audited by any taxing authority during the past five (5) years.
A-10
<PAGE>
5.16. DEPOSIT INSURANCE. The deposits of Bank are insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") in accordance with the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act, and Bank has paid all premiums and assessments with respect to
such deposit insurance.
5.17. BROKER'S OR FINDER'S FEES. Except as set forth in the Disclosure
Letter, no agent, broker or other person acting on behalf of Randolph County or
Bank or under any authority of Randolph County or Bank is or shall be entitled
to any commission, broker's or finder's fee or any other form of compensation or
payment from any of the parties hereto, other than attorneys' or accountants'
fees, in connection with any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
5.18. BRING DOWN OF REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. All representations
and warranties of Randolph County and Bank contained in this Section 5 shall be
true, accurate and correct on and as of the Effective Date except as affected by
the transactions contemplated by and specified within the terms of this
Agreement.
5.19. NONSURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. The representations
and warranties contained in this Section 5 shall expire on the Effective Date,
and thereafter Randolph County and Bank and all directors, officers and
employees of Randolph County and Bank shall have no further liability with
respect thereto unless a court of competent jurisdiction should determine that
any misrepresentation or breach of a warranty was willfully or intentionally
caused either by action or inaction.
SECTION 6
REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES OF FIRST MERCHANTS
First Merchants hereby represents and warrants to Randolph County as
follows:
6.01. ORGANIZATION AND QUALIFICATION. First Merchants is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana and has the
corporate power and authority to conduct its business in the manner and by the
means utilized as of the date hereof.
6.02. AUTHORIZATION.
(a) First Merchants has the corporate power and authority to enter
into this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder subject to
certain required regulatory approvals. The Agreement, when executed and
delivered, will have been duly authorized and will constitute a valid and
binding obligation of First Merchants, enforceable in accordance with its
terms, except to the extent limited by insolvency, reorganization,
liquidation, readjustment of debt, or other laws of general application
relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditor's rights.
(b) Neither the execution of this Agreement, nor the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby, does or will (i) conflict with,
result in a breach of, or constitute a default under First Merchant's
Articles of Incorporation or By-laws or, to the best of its knowledge, any
federal, foreign, state, or local law, statute, ordinance, rule,
regulation, or court or administrative order or decree, or any note, bond,
indenture, mortgage, security agreement, contract, arrangement, or
commitment, to which First Merchants is subject or bound, the result of
which would materially affect the business or financial condition of First
Merchants; (ii) result in the creation of or give any person the right to
create any lien, charge, claim, encumbrance, security interest, or any
A-11
<PAGE>
other rights of others or other adverse interest upon any right, property
or asset of First Merchants; (iii) terminate or give any person,
corporation or entity the right to terminate, amend, abandon, or refuse
to perform any note, bond, indenture, mortgage, security agreement,
contract, arrangement, or commitment to which First Merchants is a party
or by which First Merchant is subject or bound; or (iv) accelerate or
modify, or give any party thereto the right to accelerate or modify, the
time within which, or the terms according to which, First Merchants is
to perform any duties or obligations or receive any rights or benefits
under any note, bond, indenture, mortgage, security agreement, contract,
arrangement, or commitment.
(c) Other than in connection or in compliance with the provisions of
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, federal and state securities laws,
and applicable Indiana banking and corporate statutes, all as amended, and
the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, no notice to, filing
with, authorization of, exemption by, or consent or approval of, any public
body or authority is necessary for the consummation by First Merchants of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
6.03. CAPITALIZATION.
(a) At December 31, 1995 First Merchants had 20,000,000 authorized,
no par value, of which 5,053,901 shares were issued and outstanding. The
5,053,901 shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.
(b) First Merchants has 500,000 shares of Preferred Stock authorized,
no par value, no shares of which have been issued and no commitments exist
to issue any of such shares.
(c) Other than in connection with the proposed merger of Union
National Bancorp with and into First Merchants and pursuant to First
Merchant's Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, Stock Option
Plans and Employee Stock Purchase Plans, there are no options, commitments,
calls or agreements outstanding regarding the issuance of capital stock or
any securities representing the right to purchase or otherwise receive such
stock, or any debt securities of First Merchants. First Merchants does not
have any outstanding contractual obligation to repurchase, redeem, or
otherwise acquire any of its outstanding shares of capital stock.
(d) The shares of First Merchants' common stock to be issued pursuant
to the Merger will be fully paid, validly issued and nonassessable.
6.04. ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENTS. The Articles of Incorporation and By-laws
of First Merchants in force as of the date hereof, have been delivered to
Randolph County. The documents delivered by it represent complete and accurate
copies of the corporate documents of First Merchants in effect as of the date of
this Agreement.
6.05. ACCURACY OF STATEMENTS. Neither this Agreement nor any report,
statement, list, certificate or other information furnished or to be furnished
by First Merchants to Randolph County in connection with this Agreement or any
of the transactions contemplated hereby (including, without limitation, any
information which has been or shall be supplied by First Merchants with respect
to its business, operations and financial condition for inclusion in the proxy
statement and registration statement relating to the Merger) contains or shall
contain (in the case of information relating to the proxy statement at the time
it is mailed and to the registration statement at the time it become effective)
any untrue statement of a material fact or omits or shall omit to state a
A-12
<PAGE>
material fact necessary to make the statements contained herein or therein, in
light of the circumstances in which they are made, not misleading.
6.06. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW. First Merchants has not engaged in any
activity nor taken or omitted to take any action which has resulted or, to the
knowledge of First Merchants, could result in the violation of any local, state,
federal or foreign law, statute, rule, regulation or ordinance or of any order,
injunction, judgment or decree of any court or government agency or body, the
violation of which could materially adversely affect the business, prospects,
condition (financial or otherwise) or results of operations of First Merchants.
First Merchants possesses all licenses, franchises, permits and other
authorizations necessary for the continued conduct of its business without
material interference or interruption. There are no agreements or
understandings with, nor any orders of directives of, any regulatory agencies or
government authorities, which would have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial position of First Merchants. First Merchants has
received no written inquiries from any regulatory agency or government authority
relating to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act
or the Community Reinvestment Act.
6.07. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. First Merchants consolidated balance sheets
as of the end of the three (3) fiscal years ended December 31, 1992, 1993 and
1994 and the nine months ended September 30, 1995 and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years or
period then ended present fairly the consolidated financial condition or
position of First Merchants as of the respective dates thereof and the
consolidated results of operations of First Merchants for the respective periods
covered thereby and have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. All required regulatory
reports have been filed by First Merchants with its primary federal regulator
during 1995, 1994, 1993 and 1992, are true, accurate and complete and have been
prepared in conformity with generally accepted regulatory accounting principles
applied on a consistent basis.
6.08. ABSENCE OF CERTAIN CHANGES. Except for events and conditions
relating to the business environment in general, since September 30, 1995, no
events or conditions of any character, whether actual, threatened or
contemplated, have occurred, or can reasonably be expected to occur, which
materially adversely affect First Merchants consolidated business, prospects,
conditions (financial or otherwise), assets or results of operations or which
have caused, or can reasonably be expected to cause, First Merchants business,
on a consolidated basis, to be conducted in a materially less profitable manner
than prior to September 30, 1995.
6.09. FIRST MERCHANTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FILINGS. First
Merchants has filed all reports and other documents required to be filed by it
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933,
including First Merchants' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994, and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1995, copies of which have previously been delivered to Randolph
County.
6.10. BRING DOWN OF REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. All representations
and warranties of First Merchants contained in this Section 6 shall be true,
accurate and correct on and as of the Effective Date except as affected by the
transactions contemplated by and specified within the terms of this Agreement.
6.11. NONSURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. The representations
and warranties contained in this Section 6 shall expire on the Effective Date,
and thereafter First Merchants and all directors, officers and employees of
First Merchants shall have no further liability with respect thereto unless a
court of
A-13
<PAGE>
competent jurisdiction should determine that any misrepresentation or breach of
a warranty was willfully or intentionally caused either by action or inaction.
SECTION 7
COVENANTS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY
Randolph County covenants and agrees with First Merchants, and covenants
and agrees to cause Bank to act, as follows:
7.01. SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL. Randolph County shall submit this Agreement
to its shareholders for approval at a meeting to be called and held in
accordance with applicable law and the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of
Randolph County at the earliest possible reasonable date, and the Board of
Directors of Randolph County shall subject to their fiduciary duties recommend
to the shareholders of Randolph County that such shareholders approve this
Agreement.
7.02. OTHER APPROVALS. Randolph County and Bank shall proceed
expeditiously, cooperate fully and use their best efforts to procure upon
reasonable terms and conditions all consents, authorizations, approvals,
registrations and certificates, to complete all filings and applications and to
satisfy all other requirements prescribed by law which are necessary for
consummation of the Merger on the terms and conditions provided in this
Agreement at the earliest possible reasonable date.
7.03. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS.
(a) On and after the date of this Agreement and until the Effective
Date or until this Agreement shall be terminated as herein provided,
neither Randolph County nor Bank shall, without the prior written consent
of First Merchants, (i) make any material changes in their capital
structure; (ii) authorize a class of stock or issue, or authorize the
issuance of, stock other than or in addition to the outstanding stock as
set forth in Section 5.03 hereof; (iii) declare, distribute or pay any
dividends on their shares of common stock, or authorize a stock split, or
make any other distribution to their shareholders, except for (a) the
payment by Randolph County prior to the Effective Date of quarterly cash
dividends on its common stock in April, 1996 (for the first fiscal quarter)
and July, 1996 (for the second fiscal quarter), which dividends shall not
exceed One and 50/100 Dollars ($1.50) and One and 50/100 Dollars ($1.50)
per share, respectively, provided that Randolph County shall not pay any
such dividend with respect to any fiscal quarter in which the Merger shall
become effective and in which Randolph County shareholders will become
entitled to receive dividends on the shares of First Merchants into which
the shares of Randolph County have been converted, and (b) the payment by
the Bank to Randolph County of dividends to pay Randolph County's expenses
of operations and its business and payment of fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; (iv)
merge, combine or consolidate with or sell their assets or any of their
securities to any other person, corporation or entity, effect a share
exchange or enter into any other transaction not in the ordinary course of
business; (v) incur any liability or obligation, make any commitment,
payment or disbursement, enter into any contract, agreement, understanding
or arrangement or engage in any transaction, or acquire or dispose of any
property or asset having a fair market value in excess of $10,000.00
(except for personal or real property acquired or disposed of in connection
with foreclosures on mortgages or enforcement of security interests and
loans made or sold by Bank in the ordinary course of business); (vi)
subject any of their properties or assets to a mortgage, lien, claim,
charge, option, restriction, security interest or encumbrance; (vii)
promote or increase or decrease the rate of
A-14
<PAGE>
compensation (except for promotions and non-material increases in the
ordinary course of business and in accordance with past practices) or
enter into any agreement to promote or increase or decrease the rate of
compensation of any director, officer or employee of Randolph County or
Bank; (viii) execute, create, institute, modify or amend any pension,
retirement, savings, stock purchase, stock bonus, stock ownership, stock
option, stock appreciation or depreciation right or profit sharing
plans, any employment, deferred compensation, consultant, bonus or
collective bargaining agreement, group insurance contract or other
incentive, welfare or employee benefit plan or agreement for current or
former directors, officers of employees of Randolph County or Bank,
change the level of benefits or payments under any of the foregoing or
increase or decrease any severance or termination of pay benefits or any
other fringe or employee benefits other than as required by law or
regulatory authorities; (ix) amend their Articles of Incorporation or
By-Laws from those in effect on the date of this Agreement; (x) modify,
amend or institute new employment policies or practices, or enter into,
renew or extend any employment or severance agreements with respect to
any present or former Randolph County or Bank directors, officers or
employees; (xi) give, dispose, sell, convey, assign, hypothecate,
pledge, encumber or otherwise transfer or grant a security interest in
any common stock of Bank; and (xii) fail to make additions to Bank's
reserve for loan, losses, or any other reserve account, in the ordinary
course of business and in accordance with sound banking practices.
(b) Randolph County and Bank shall maintain, or cause to be
maintained, in full force and effect insurance on its properties and
operations and fidelity coverage on its directors, officers and employees
in such amounts and with regard to such liabilities and hazards as
customarily are maintained by other companies operating similar businesses.
(c) Randolph County and Bank shall continue to give to First
Merchants and its employees, accountants, attorneys and other authorized
representatives reasonable access during regular business hours and other
reasonable times to all their premises, properties, statements, books and
records.
7.04. PRESERVATION OF BUSINESS. On and after the date of this Agreement
and until the Effective Date or until this Agreement is terminated as herein
provided. Randolph County and Bank each shall (a) carry on their business
diligently, substantially in the same manner as heretofore conducted, and in the
ordinary course of business; (b) use their best efforts to preserve their
business organizations intact, to keep their present officers and employees and
to preserve their present relationship with customers and others having business
dealings with them; and (c) not do or fail to do anything which will cause a
material breach of, or material default in, any contract, agreement, commitment,
obligation, understanding, arrangement, lease or license to which they are a
party or by which they are or may be subject or bound.
7.05. OTHER NEGOTIATIONS. Except with the prior written approval of First
Merchants, on and after the date of this Agreement and until the Effective Date,
Randolph County and Bank shall not, and shall not permit or authorize their
respective directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives to,
directly or indirectly, initiate, solicit, encourage, or engage in discussions
or negotiations with, or provide information to, any corporation, association,
partnership, person or other entity or group concerning any merger,
consolidation, share exchange, combination, purchase or sale of substantial
assets, sale of shares of capital stock (or securities convertible or
exchangeable into or otherwise evidencing, or any agreement or instrument
evidencing the right to acquire, capital stock), tender offer, acquisition of
control of Randolph County or Bank or similar transaction involving Randolph
A-15
<PAGE>
County or Bank (all such transactions hereinafter referred to as "Acquisition
Transactions"). Randolph County and Bank shall promptly communicate to First
Merchants the terms of any proposal, written or oral, which either may receive
with respect to an Acquisition Transaction and any request by or indication of
interest on the part of any third party with respect to initiation of any
Acquisition Transaction or discussion with respect thereto.
7.06. RESTRICTIONS REGARDING AFFILIATES. Randolph County shall, within 30
days after the date of this Agreement and promptly thereafter until the
Effective Date to reflect any changes, provide First Merchants with a list
identifying each person who may be deemed to be an "affiliate" of Randolph
County for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
("1933 Act"). Each director, executive officer and other person who is an
"affiliate" of Randolph County for purposes of the 1933 Act shall deliver to
First Merchants on or prior to the Effective Date hereunder a written agreement,
in form and substance satisfactory to counsel to First Merchants, providing that
such person will not sell, pledge, transfer, dispose of or otherwise reduce his
market risk with respect to shares of First Merchants common stock to be
received by such person pursuant to this Agreement (a) during the period 30 days
prior to the Effective Date, (b) until such time as financial results covering
at least 30 days of combined operations of First Merchants and Randolph County
have been published within the meaning of Section 201.01 of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Codification of Financial Reporting Policies, and (c)
unless such sales are pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
1933 Act or pursuant to Rule 145 of the Securities and Exchange Commission or
another exemption from the 1933 Act.
7.07. PRESS RELEASE. Neither Randolph County or Bank shall issue any
press releases or make any other public announcements or disclosures relating to
the Merger without the prior approval of First Merchants.
7.08. DISCLOSURE LETTER UPDATE. Randolph County shall promptly
supplement, amend and update monthly and as of the Effective Date the Disclosure
Letter with respect to any matters hereafter arising which, if in existence or
having occurred as of the date of this Agreement, would have been required to be
set forth or described in the Disclosure Letter.
SECTION 8
COVENANTS OF FIRST MERCHANTS
First Merchants covenants and agrees with Randolph County as follows:
8.01. APPROVALS. First Merchants shall proceed expeditiously, cooperate
fully and use its best efforts to procure upon reasonable terms and conditions
all consents, authorizations, approvals, registrations and certificates, to
complete all filings and applications and to satisfy all other requirements
prescribed by law which are necessary for consummation of the Merger on the
terms and conditions provided in this Agreement. First Merchants shall provide
Randolph County with copies of proposed regulatory filings in connection with
the Merger and afford Randolph County the opportunity to offer comment on the
filings before filing. The approval of First Merchants shareholders of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement is not required.
8.02. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS. Within one (1) year following the Effective
Date, First Merchants will permit Bank employees to participate in any
tax-qualified retirement plan First Merchants maintains for its employees,
provided that such an employee meets the applicable participation requirements,
in lieu of the Bank's current tax-qualified retirement plan. Until that time,
the Bank's current tax-qualified retirement plan will be maintained at the same
level, with respect to benefit accruals, provided for on the Effective Date.
A-16
<PAGE>
Following the Effective Date, Bank employees will otherwise receive employee
benefits that in the aggregate are substantially comparable to the employee
benefits provided to those employees by Randolph County or the Bank on the
Effective Date. For purposes of determining a Randolph County or Bank
employee's eligibility and vesting service under a First Merchant's employee
benefit plan that the employee is permitted to enter, service with Randolph
County or Bank will be treated as service with First Merchants; provided,
however, that service with Randolph County or Bank will not be treated as
service with First Merchants for purposes of benefit accrual.
8.03. FIRST MERCHANTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS. In connection with the first
annual meeting of the shareholders of First Merchants following the Effective
Date, First Merchants shall cause all necessary action to be taken to cause the
current Chairman of the Board of the Bank, Michael Wickersham, to be nominated
for election as a member of the First Merchants' Board of Directors for a three
(3)-year term.
8.04. PRESS RELEASE. Except as required by law, First Merchants shall not
issue any press release to any national wire service relating solely to the
Merger without the prior approval of Randolph County.
8.05. CONFIDENTIALITY. First Merchants shall, and shall use its best
efforts to cause its officers, employees, and authorized representatives to,
hold in strict confidence all confidential data and information obtained by it
from Randolph County or Bank, unless such information (i) was already known to
First Merchants, (ii) becomes available to First Merchants from other sources,
(iii) is independently developed by First Merchants, (iv) is disclosed outside
of First Merchants with and in accordance with the terms of prior written
approval of Randolph County or Bank , or (v) is or becomes readily ascertainable
from public or published information or trade sources or public disclosure of
such information is required by law or requested by a court or other
governmental agency, commission, or regulatory body. First Merchants further
agrees that in the event the Agreement is terminated, it will return to Randolph
County all information obtained by First Merchants regarding Randolph County or
Bank, including all copies made of such information by First Merchants.
8.06. COVENANTS REGARDING THE BANK. Upon consummation of the Merger, the
Bank shall be a bank organized under the laws of the State of Indiana and the
officers and directors of the Bank in office immediately prior to the
consummation of the Merger shall be the officers and directors of the Bank at
the Effective Date subject to the provisions of the Bank's Articles of
Incorporation and By-Laws. The Bank directors will be subject to First
Merchants' policy of mandatory retirement at age seventy (70); provided,
however, the policy of mandatory retirement will not apply to any of the Bank's
current directors until twelve (12) months after the Effective Date. First
Merchants intends to continue to operate the Bank as an operating subsidiary of
First Merchants under the name "The Randolph County Bank."
SECTION 9
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE MERGER
The obligation of each of the parties hereto to consummate the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement is subject to the satisfaction and fulfillment of
each of the following conditions on or prior to the Effective Date:
9.01. SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL. The shareholders of Randolph County shall
have approved, ratified and confirmed this Agreement as required by applicable
law.
A-17
<PAGE>
9.02. REGISTRATION STATEMENT EFFECTIVE. First Merchants shall have
registered its shares of common stock to be issued to shareholders of Randolph
County in accordance with this Agreement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the 1933 Act, and all state securities and "blue sky"
approvals and authorizations required to offer and sell such shares shall have
been received by First Merchants. The registration statement with respect
thereto shall have been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and no stop order shall have been issued or threatened.
9.03. TAX OPINION. The parties shall have obtained an opinion of counsel
which shall be in form and content satisfactory to counsel for all parties
hereto, to the effect that the Merger effected pursuant to this Agreement shall
constitute a tax-free transaction (except to the extent cash is received) to
each party hereto and to the shareholders of each party. Such opinion shall be
based upon factual representations received by such counsel from the parties,
which representations may take the form of written certifications.
9.04. AFFILIATE AGREEMENTS. First Merchants shall have obtained (a) from
Randolph County, a list identifying each affiliate of Randolph County and (b)
from each affiliate of Randolph County, the agreements contemplated by Section
7.06 hereof.
9.05. REGULATORY APPROVALS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System and the Indiana Department of Financial Institutions shall have
authorized and approved the Merger and the transactions related thereto. In
addition, all appropriate orders, consents, approvals and clearances from all
other regulatory agencies and governmental authorities whose orders, consents,
approvals or clearances are required by law for consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall have been obtained.
9.06. OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE. First Merchants and Randolph County shall
have delivered to each other a certificate signed by their Chairman or President
and their Secretary, dated the Effective Date, certifying that (a) all the
representations and warranties of their respective corporations are true,
accurate and correct on and as of the Effective Date; (b) all the covenants of
their respective corporations have been complied with from the date of the
Agreement through and as of the Effective Date; and (c) their respective
corporations have satisfied and fully complied with all conditions necessary to
make this Agreement effective as to them.
9.07. FAIRNESS OPINION. Randolph County shall have obtained an opinion
from an investment banker of its choosing to the effect that the terms of the
Merger, is fair to the shareholders of Randolph County from a financial
viewpoint. Such opinion shall be (a) in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Randolph County, (b) dated as of a date not later than the
mailing date of the Proxy Statement relating to the Merger and (c) included in
the Proxy Statement.
9.08. POOLING OF INTERESTS. First Merchants shall have obtained from its
independent accountants, Geo. S. Olive & Co. LLC, a letter stating that, based
upon their review of such documents and information which they deemed relevant,
such firm is currently unaware of any reason why the Merger cannot be accounted
for as a "pooling of interests."
SECTION 10
TERMINATION OF MERGER
10.01. MANNER OF TERMINATION. This Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Date by
A-18
<PAGE>
written notice delivered by First Merchants to Randolph County or by Randolph
County to First Merchants:
(a) By Randolph County or First Merchants, if there has been a
material misrepresentation, a breach of warranty or a failure to comply
with any covenant on the part of any party in the representation,
warranties, and covenants set forth herein; provided the party in default
shall have no right to terminate for its own default;
(b) By Randolph County or First Merchants, if it shall determine in
its sole discretion that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
have become inadvisable or impracticable by reason of commencement or
threat of material litigation or proceedings against any of the parties;
(c) By Randolph County or First Merchants, if the financial
condition, business, assets, or results of operations of the other party
shall have been materially and adversely changed from that in existence at
September 30, 1995;
(d) By Randolph County or First Merchants, if the transaction
contemplated herein has not been consummated by September 30, 1996;
(e) By First Merchants if any of the items, events or information set
forth in any update to the Disclosure Letter has had or may have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, business,
or prospects of Randolph County or Bank;
(f) By First Merchants or Randolph County if the Merger will not
constitute a tax-free reorganization under the Code; or
(g) By First Merchants if the Merger cannot be accounted for as a
"pooling of interests."
10.02. EFFECT OF TERMINATION. Upon termination by written notice, as
provided in this Section, this Agreement shall be void and of no further force
or effect and there shall be no obligation on the part of Randolph County or
First Merchants or their respective officers, directors, employees, agents, or
shareholders, except for payment of their respective expenses and First
Merchants obligations under Section 8.05.
SECTION 11
EFFECTIVE DATE OF MERGER
Subject to the terms and upon satisfaction of all requirements of law and
the conditions specified in this Agreement, the Merger shall become effective at
the close of business on the day specified in the Articles of Merger of Randolph
County with and into First Merchants as filed with the Secretary of State of
Indiana ("Effective Date"). The Effective Date shall occur no later than the
last business day of the month in which that thirty (30) day period following
the last approval of the Merger by a federal regulatory agency or governmental
authority expires.
SECTION 12
CLOSING
12.01. CLOSING DATE AND PLACE. The closing of the Merger ("Closing")
shall take place at the main office of First Merchants on the Effective Date.
A-19
<PAGE>
12.02. ARTICLES OF MERGER. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement,
on the Effective Date, the Articles of Merger shall be duly filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Indiana.
12.03. OPINIONS OF COUNSEL. At the Closing, Randolph County shall deliver
an opinion of its counsel, Cook & Haviza, to First Merchants, and First
Merchants shall deliver an opinion of its counsel, Bingham Summers Welsh &
Spilman, to Randolph County, dated as of the date of the Closing and
substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively,
attached hereto.
SECTION 13
MISCELLANEOUS
13.01. EFFECTIVE AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and
inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and
permitted assigns, but none of the provisions thereof shall inure to the benefit
of any other person, firm, or corporation whomsoever. Neither this Agreement
nor any of the rights, interests, or obligations hereunder shall be assigned or
transferred by either party hereto without the prior written consent of the
other party.
13.02. WAIVER; AMENDMENT.
(a) First Merchants and Randolph County may, by an instrument in
writing executed in the same manner as this Agreement: (i) extend the time
for the performance of any of the covenants or agreements of the other
party under this Agreement; (ii) waive any inaccuracies in the
representations or warranties of the other party contained in this
Agreement or in any document delivered pursuant hereto or thereto; (iii)
waive the performance by the other party of any of the covenants or
agreements to be performed by it or them under this Agreement; or (iv)
waive the satisfaction or fulfillment of any condition the nonsatisfaction
or nonfulfillment of which is a condition to the right of the party so
waiving to terminate this Agreement. The waiver by any party hereto of a
breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed
as a waiver of any other or subsequent breach hereunder.
(b) Notwithstanding approval by the shareholders of Randolph County,
this Agreement may be amended, modified, or supplemented by the written
agreement of Randolph County and First Merchants without further approval
of such shareholders, except that no such amendment, modification, or
supplement shall result in a decrease in the consideration specified in
Section 3 hereof or shall materially adversely affect the rights of
shareholders of Randolph County without the further approval of such
shareholders.
13.03. NOTICES. Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall
be deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person, receipted for or sent
by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as
follows:
If to First Merchants: With a copy to:
200 E. Jackson Street Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
Box 792 2700 Market Tower
Muncie, IN 47305 10 West Market Street
Attn: Stefan S. Anderson, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2982
President Attn: David R. Prechtel, Esq.
If to Randolph County: With a copy to:
A-20
<PAGE>
122 West Washington St. Cook & Haviza
Winchester, IN 47394 111 North Main Street
Attn: Max Gordon, Winchester, IN 47384
Chairman Attn: John T. Cook, Esq.
or such substituted address as any of them have given to the other in writing.
13.04. HEADINGS. The headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely
for the ease of reference and should not be considered in the interpretation or
construction of this Agreement.
13.05. SEVERABILITY. In case any one or more of the provisions contained
herein shall, for any reason, be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not
affect any other provision of this Agreement, but this Agreement shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision or provisions
had never been contained herein.
13.06. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but such counterparts shall
together constitute one and the same instrument.
13.07. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement is executed in and shall be
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Indiana.
13.08. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement supersedes any other agreement,
whether oral or written, between First Merchants and Randolph County relating to
the matters contemplated hereby, and constitutes the entire agreement between
the parties hereto.
13.09. EXPENSES. First Merchants and Randolph County shall each pay their
own expenses incidental to the transactions contemplated hereby. It is
understood that the cost of the fairness opinion referenced in Section 9.07
shall be borne by Randolph County whether or not the Merger is consummated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, First Merchants and Randolph County have made and
entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written and have
caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by their duly authorized
officers.
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
ATTEST:
/s/ Rodney A. Medler By /s/ Stefan S. Anderson
- ----------------------------- --------------------------------
Rodney A. Medler, Secretary Stefan S. Anderson, President
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
ATTEST:
/s/ William Ward By /s/ Max Gordon
- ----------------------------- --------------------------------
William Ward, Secretary Max Gordon, Chairman
A-21
<PAGE>
APPENDIX B
CHAPTER 44
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
23-1-44.1. "CORPORATION" DEFINED. - As used in this chapter, "corporation"
means the issuer of the shares held by a dissenter before the corporate action,
or the surviving or acquiring corporation by merger or share exchange of that
issuer. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-2. "DISSENTER" DEFINED. - As used in this chapter, "dissenter"
means a shareholder who is entitled to dissent from corporate action under
section 8 [IC 23-1-44-8] of this chapter and who exercises that right when and
in the manner required by sections 10 through 18 [IC 23-1-44-10 through IC 23-1-
44-18] of this chapter. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-3. "FAIR VALUE" DEFINED. - As used in this chapter, "fair value,"
with respect to a dissenter's shares, means the value of the shares immediately
before the effectuation of the corporate action to which the dissenter objects,
excluding any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the corporate
action unless exclusion would be inequitable. [P.L 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-4. "INTEREST" DEFINED. - As used in this chapter, "interest" means
interest from the effective date of the corporate action until the date of
payment, at the average rate currently paid by the corporation on its principal
bank loans, or, if none, at a rate that is fair and equitable under all the
circumstances. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-5. "RECORD SHAREHOLDER" DEFINED. - As used in this chapter,
"record shareholder" means the person in whose name shares are registered in the
records of a corporation or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent that
treatment as a record shareholder is provided under a recognition procedure or a
disclosure procedure established under IC 23-1-30-4. [P.L. 149-1986, Section
28.]
23-1-44-6. "BENEFICIAL SHAREHOLDER" DEFINED. - As used in this chapter,
"beneficial shareholder" means the person who is a beneficial owner of shares
held by a nominee as the record shareholder. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-7. "SHAREHOLDER" DEFINED. - As used in this chapter, "shareholder"
means the record shareholder or the beneficial shareholder. [P.L. 149-1986,
Section 28.]
23-1-44-8. SHAREHOLDER DISSENT. - (a) A shareholder is entitled to
dissent from, and obtain payment of the fair value of the shareholder's shares
in the event of, any of the following corporate actions:
(1) Consummation of a plan of merger to which the corporation is a
party if:
(A) Shareholder approval is required for the merger by IC 23-1-
40-3 or the articles of incorporation; and
(B) The shareholder is entitled to vote on the merger.
(2) Consummation of a plan of share exchange to which the corporation
is a party as the corporation whose shares will be acquired, if the
shareholder is entitled to vote on the plan.
B-1
<PAGE>
(3) Consummation of a sale or exchange of all, or substantially all,
of the property of the corporation other than in the usual and regular
course of business, if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the sale
or exchange, including a sale in dissolution, but not including a sale
pursuant to court order or a sale for cash pursuant to a plan by which
all or substantially all of the net proceeds of the sale will be
distributed to the shareholders within one (1) year after the date of
sale.
(4) The approval of a control share acquisition under IC 23-1-42.
(5) Any corporation action taken pursuant to a shareholder vote to
the extent the articles of incorporation, bylaws, or a resolution of
the board of directors provides that voting or nonvoting shareholders
are entitled to dissent and obtain payment for their shares.
(b) This section does not apply to the holders of shares of any class or
series if, on the date fixed to determine the shareholders entitled to receive
notice of and vote at the meeting of shareholders at which the merger, plan of
share exchange, or sale or exchange of property is to be acted on, the shares of
that class or series were:
(1) Registered on a United States securities exchange registered
under the Exchange Act (as defined in IC 23-1-43-9); or
(2) Traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
Automated Quotation System Over-the-Counter Markets - National Market
Issues or a similar market.
(c) A shareholder:
(1) Who is entitled to dissent and obtain payment for the
shareholder's shares under this chapter; or
(2) Who would be so entitled to dissent and obtain payment but for
the provisions of subsection (b);
may not challenge the corporate action creating (or that, but for the
provisions of subsection (b), would have created) the shareholder's
entitlement. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28; P.L. 107-1987, Section 19.]
23-1-44-9. BENEFICIAL SHAREHOLDER DISSENT. - (a) A record shareholder may
assert dissenters' rights as to fewer than all the shares registered in the
shareholder's name only if the shareholder dissents with respect to all shares
beneficially owned by any one (1) person and notifies the corporation in writing
of the name and address of each person on whose behalf the shareholder asserts
dissenters' rights. The rights of a partial dissenter under this subsection are
determined as if the shares as to which the shareholder dissents and the
shareholder's other shares were registered in the names of different
shareholders.
(b) A beneficial shareholder may assert dissenters' rights as to shares
held on the shareholder's behalf only if:
(1) The beneficial shareholder submits to the corporation the record
shareholder's written consent to the dissent not later than the time
the beneficial shareholder asserts dissenters' rights and
(2) The beneficial shareholder does so with respect to all the
beneficial shareholder's shares or those shares over which the
beneficial shareholder has power to direct the vote. [P.L. 149-1986,
Section 28.]
B-2
<PAGE>
23-1-44-10. NOTICE OF DISSENTERS' RIGHTS PRECEDING SHAREHOLDER VOTE. -
(a) If proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights under section 8
[IC 23-1-44-8] of this chapter is submitted to a vote at a shareholders'
meeting, the meeting notice must state that shareholders are or may be
entitled to assert dissenters' rights under this chapter.
(b) If corporate action creating dissenters' rights under section 8 of
this chapter is taken without a vote of shareholders, the corporation shall
notify in writing all shareholders entitled to assert dissenters' rights that
the action was taken and send them the dissenters' notice described in section
12 [IC 23-1-44-12] of this chapter. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28; P.L. 107-1987,
Section 20.]
23-1-44-11. NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISSENT. - (a) If proposed corporate
action creating dissenters' rights under section 8 [IC 23-1-44-8] of this
chapter is submitted to a vote at a shareholders' meeting, a shareholder who
wishes to assert dissenters' rights:
(1) Must deliver to the corporation before the vote is taken written
notice of the shareholder's intent to demand payment for the
shareholder's shares if the proposed action is effectuated; and
(2) Must not vote the shareholder's shares in favor of the proposed
action.
(b) A shareholder who does not satisfy the requirements of subsection (a)
is not entitled to payment for the shareholder's shares under this chapter.
[P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-12. NOTICE OF DISSENTERS' RIGHTS FOLLOWING ACTION CREATING RIGHTS.
- - (a) If proposed corporate action creating dissenters' rights under section 8
[IC 23-1-44-8] of this chapter is authorized at a shareholders' meeting, the
corporation shall deliver a written dissenters' notice to all shareholders who
satisfied the requirements of section 11 [IC 23-1-44-11] of this chapter.
(b) The dissenters' notice must be sent no later than ten (10) days after
approval by the shareholders, or if corporate action is taken without approval
by the shareholders, then ten (10) days after the corporate action was taken.
The dissenters' notice must:
(1) State where the payment demand must be sent and where and when
certificates for certificated shares must be deposited;
(2) Inform holders of uncertificated shares to what extent transfer
of the shares will be restricted after the payment demand is received;
(3) Supply a form for demanding payment that includes the date of the
first announcement to news media or to shareholders of the terms of
the proposed corporate action and requires that the person asserting
dissenters' rights certify whether or not the person acquired
beneficial ownership of the shares before that date;
(4) Set a date by which the corporation must receive the payment
demand, which date may not be fewer than thirty (30) nor more than
sixty (60) days after the date the subsection (a) notice is delivered;
and
(5) Be accompanied by a copy of this chapter. [P.L. 149-1986,
Section 28.]
23-1-44-13. DEMAND FOR PAYMENT BY DISSENTER. - (a) A shareholder sent a
dissenters' notice described in IC 23-1-42-11 or in section 12 [IC 23-1-44-12]
of this chapter must demand payment, certify whether the shareholder acquired
beneficial ownership of the shares before the date required to be set forth in
the dissenters'
B-3
<PAGE>
notice under section 12(b)(3) [IC 23-1-44-12(b)(3)] of this chapter, and deposit
the shareholder's certificates in accordance with the terms of the notice.
(b) The shareholder who demands payment and deposits the shareholder's
shares under subsection (a) retains all other rights of a shareholder until
these rights are cancelled or modified by the taking of the proposed corporate
action.
(c) A shareholder who does not demand payment or deposit the shareholder's
share certificates where required, each by the date set in the dissenters'
notice, is not entitled to payment for the shareholder's shares under this
chapter and is considered, for purposes of this article, to have voted the
shareholder's shares in favor of the proposed corporate action. [P.L. 149-1986,
Section 28.]
23-1-44-14. TRANSFER OF SHARES RESTRICTED AFTER DEMAND FOR PAYMENT. - (a)
The corporation may restrict the transfer of uncertificated shares from the date
the demand for their payment is received until the proposed corporate action is
taken or the restrictions released under section 16 [IC 23-1-44-16] of this
chapter.
(b) The person for whom dissenters' rights are asserted as to
uncertificated shares retains all other rights of a shareholder until these
rights are cancelled or modified by the taking of the proposed corporate action.
[P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-15. PAYMENT TO DISSENTER. - (a) Except as provided in section 17
[IC 23-1-44-17] of this chapter, as soon as the proposed corporate action is
taken, or, if the transaction did not need shareholder approval and has been
completed, upon receipt of a payment demand, the corporation shall pay each
dissenter who complied with section 13 [IC 23-1-44-13] of this chapter the
amount the corporation estimates to be the fair value of the dissenters' shares.
(b) The payment must be accompanied by:
(1) The corporation's balance sheet as of the end of a fiscal year
ending not more than sixteen (16) months before the date of payment,
an income statement for that year, a statement of changes in
shareholders' equity for that year, and the latest available interim
financial statements, if any;
(2) A statement of the corporation's estimate of the fair value of
the shares; and
(3) A statement of the dissenters' right to demand payment under
section 18 [IC 23-1-44-18] of this chapter. [P.L. 149-1986, Section
28; P.L. 107-1987, Section 21.]
23-1-44-16. RETURN OF SHARES AND RELEASE OF RESTRICTIONS. - (a) If the
corporation does not take the proposed action within sixty (60) days after the
date set for demanding payment and depositing share certificates, the
corporation shall return the deposited certificates and release the transfer
restrictions imposed on uncertificated shares.
(b) If after returning deposited certificates and releasing transfer
restrictions, the corporation takes the proposed action, it must send a new
dissenters' notice under section 12 [IC 23-1-44-12] of this chapter and repeat
the payment demand procedure. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-17. OFFER OF FAIR VALUE FOR SHARES OBTAINED AFTER FIRST
ANNOUNCEMENT. - (a) A corporation may elect to withhold payment required by
section 15 [IC 23-1-44-15] of this chapter from a dissenter unless the dissenter
was the beneficial owner of the shares before the date set forth in the
dissenters' notice as the date of the first announcement to news media or to
shareholders of the terms of the proposed corporate action.
B-4
<PAGE>
(b) To the extent the corporation elects to withhold payment under
subsection (a), after taking the proposed corporate action, it shall estimate
the fair value of the shares and shall pay this amount to each dissenter who
agrees to accept it in full satisfaction of the dissenter's demand. The
corporation shall send with its offer a statement of its estimate of the fair
value of the shares and a statement of the dissenter's right to demand payment
under section 18 [IC 23-1-44-18] of this chapter. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-18. DISSENTER DEMAND FOR FAIR VALUE UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS. -
(a) A dissenter may notify the corporation in writing of the dissenter's own
estimate of the fair value of the dissenter's shares and demand payment of the
dissenter's estimate (less any payment under section 15 [IC 23-1-44-15] of this
chapter), or reject the corporation's offer under section 17 [IC 23-1-44-17] of
this chapter and demand payment of the fair value of the dissenter's shares, if:
(1) The dissenter believes that the amount paid under section 15 of
this chapter or offered under section 17 of this chapter is less than
the fair value of the dissenter's shares;
(2) The corporation fails to make payment under section 15 of this
chapter within sixty (60) days after the date set for demanding
payment; or
(3) The corporation, having failed to take the proposed action, does
not return the deposited certificates or release the transfer
restrictions imposed on uncertificated shares within sixty (60) days
after the date set for demanding payment.
(b) A dissenter waives the right to demand payment under this section
unless the dissenter notifies the corporation of the dissenter's demand in
writing under subsection (a) within thirty (30) days after the corporation made
or offered payment for the dissenter's shares. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-19. EFFECT OF FAILURE TO PAY DEMAND - COMMENCEMENT OF JUDICIAL
APPRAISAL PROCEEDING. - (a) If a demand for payment under IC 23-1-42-11 or
under section 18 [IC 23-1-44-18] of this chapter remains unsettled, the
corporation shall commence a proceeding within sixty (60) days after receiving
the payment demand and petition the court to determine the fair value of the
shares. If the corporation does not commence the proceeding within the sixty
(60) day period, it shall pay each dissenter whose demand remains unsettled the
amount demanded.
(b) The corporation shall commence the proceeding in the circuit or
superior court of the county where a corporation's principal office (or, if none
in Indiana, its registered office) is located. If the corporation is a foreign
corporation without a registered office in Indiana, it shall commence the
proceeding, in the county in Indiana where the registered office of the domestic
corporation merged with or whose shares were acquired by the foreign corporation
was located.
(c) The corporation shall make all dissenters (whether or not residents of
this state) whose demands remain unsettled parties to the proceeding as in an
action against their shares and all parties must be served with a copy of the
petition. Nonresidents may be served by registered or certified mail or by
publication as provided by law.
(d) The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is commenced
under subsection (b) is plenary and exclusive. The court may appoint one (1) or
more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and recommend decision on the
question of fair value. The appraisers have the powers described in the order
appointing them or in any amendment to it. The dissenters are entitled to the
same discovery rights as parties in other civil proceedings.
(e) Each dissenter made a party to the proceeding is entitled to judgment.
B-5
<PAGE>
(1) For the amount, if any, by which the court finds the fair value
of the dissenter's shares, plus interest, exceeds the amount paid by
the corporation; or
(2) For the fair value, plus accrued interest, of the dissenter's
after-acquired shares for which the corporation elected to withhold
payment under section 17 [IC 23-1-44-17] of this chapter.
[P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
23-1-44-20. JUDICIAL DETERMINATION AND ASSESSMENT OF COSTS. - (a) The
court in an appraisal proceeding commenced under section 19 [IC 23-1-44-19] of
this chapter shall determine all costs of the proceeding, including the
reasonable compensation and expenses of appraisers appointed by the court. The
court shall assess the costs against such parties and in such amounts as the
court finds equitable.
(b) The court may also assess the fees and expenses of counsel and experts
for the respective parties, in amounts the court finds equitable:
(1) Against the corporation and in favor of any or all dissenters if
the court finds the corporation did not substantially comply with the
requirements of sections 10 through 18 [IC 23-1-44-10 through
IC 23-1-44-18] of this chapter; or
(2) Against either the corporation or a dissenter, in favor of any
other party, if the court finds that the party against whom the fees
and expenses are assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in
good faith with respect to the rights provided by this chapter.
(c) If the court finds that the services of counsel for any dissenter were
of substantial benefit to other dissenters similarly situated and that the fees
for those services should not be assessed against the corporation, the court may
award to these counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the amounts awarded the
dissenters who were benefited. [P.L. 149-1986, Section 28.]
B-6
<PAGE>
APPENDIX C
PROFESSIONAL BANK SERVICES
______________, 1996
Board of Directors
Randolph County Bancorp, Inc.
122 West Washington Street
Winchester, Indiana 47394
Dear Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as investment bankers as to the fairness, from a
financial perspective, to the common shareholders of Randolph County Bancorp,
Winchester, Indiana ("Company"), and its wholly owned subsidiary The Randolph
County Bank ("Bank"), of the proposed merger of the Company with and into First
Merchants Corporation, Muncie, Indiana ("First Merchants"). In the proposed
merger, Company shareholders will receive twenty and fifty-three one hundredths
(20.53) common shares of First Merchants per Company common share, subject to
certain adjustments as defined in the Definitive Merger Agreement (the
"Agreement").
Professional Bank Services, Inc. ("PBS") is a bank consulting firm and as part
of its investment banking business is continually engaged in reviewing the
fairness, from a financial perspective, of bank acquisition transactions and in
the valuation of banks and other businesses and their securities in connection
with mergers, acquisitions, estate settlements and other purposes. We are
independent with respect to the parties of the proposed transaction.
For purposes of this opinion, PBS reviewed and analyzed the historical
performance of the Company as set forth in: (i) December 31, 1995 audited
financial statements of the Company; (ii) December 31, 1995 and September 30,
1995 Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income as filed with the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), by the Bank; (iii) December 31, 1995
unaudited internal reports of condition and income for the Bank and the Company;
(iv) September 30, 1995 and December 31, 1994 Uniform Bank Performance Reports
of the Bank; (v) December 31, 1994 audited annual report of the Company; (vi)
the historical common stock trading activity of the Company; and (vii) the
premises and other fixed assets. We have reviewed and tabulated statistical
data regarding the loan portfolio, securities portfolio and other performance
ratios and statistics. Financial projections were prepared and analyzed, as
well as other financial studies, analyses and investigations as deemed relevant
for the purposes of this opinion. We have reviewed and tabulated consolidated
statistical data regarding growth, growth prospects for service markets,
liquidity, asset composition and quality, profitability, leverage and capital
adequacy. In review of the aforementioned information, we have taken into
account our assessment of general market and financial conditions, our
experience in other transactions, and our knowledge of the banking industry
generally.
In conjunction with our opinion, we have analyzed and evaluated the historical
performance and current financial condition of First Merchants as contained in:
(i) December 31, 1995 audited annual report and 10-K as filed with the SEC;
(ii) September 30, 1995 and June 30, 1995 10-Q's filed with the SEC; (iii)
audited annual reports for the years ending December 31, 1994, 1993; (iv)
February 17, 1995 Proxy Statement; (v) historical common stock trading and
dividend activity to date; (vi) the Agreement; and (vii) the financial terms of
certain other comparable transactions. We have prepared and analyzed the pro
forma
C-1
<PAGE>
Board of Directors
Randolph County Bancorp, Inc.
________________, 1996
Page 2
consolidated financial condition of the Company and First Merchants. We have
reviewed and tabulated consolidated statistical data regarding growth prospects
for service markets, liquidity, asset composition and quality, profitability,
leverage and capital adequacy.
We have not compiled, reviewed or audited the financial statements of the
Company or First Merchants, nor have we independently verified any of the
information reviewed; we have relied upon such information as being complete
and accurate in all material respects. We have not made independent evaluation
of the assets of the Company or First Merchants.
Based on the foregoing and all other factors deemed relevant, it is our opinion
as investment bankers that, as of the date hereof, the consideration proposed to
be received by the shareholders of the Company under the Agreement is fair and
equitable from a financial perspective.
Very truly yours,
PROFESSIONAL BANK SERVICES, INC.
C-2
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 20. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
The Registrant's Articles of Incorporation provide that the Registrant will
indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the
Registrant or of any other corporation for which he is or was serving in any
capacity at the request of the Registrant against all liability and expense that
may be incurred in connection with or resulting from or arising out of any
claim, action, suit or proceeding with respect to which such director, officer
or employee is wholly successful or acted in good faith in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the
Registrant or such other corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. A
director, officer, employee or agent of the Registrant is entitled to be
indemnified as a matter of right with respect to those claims, actions, suits or
proceedings where he has been wholly successful. In all other cases, such
director, officer, employee or agent will be indemnified only if the Board of
Directors of the Registrant or independent legal counsel finds that he has met
the standards of conduct set forth above.
ITEM 21. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) The following Exhibits are being filed as part of this Registration
Statement:
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit Form S-4 Page
- ------------ ---------------------- -------------
1. None
2. Agreement of Reorganization and Merger. . . . . . . . . . . (A)
3.a. Articles of Incorporation, dated September 20, 1982,
and the Articles of Amendment thereto dated
March 13, 1985 and March 14, 1988 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (B)
b. Bylaws and amendments thereto dated February 12, 1985,
February 20, 1987, July 14, 1987, December 8, 1987,
December 13, 1988, November 14, 1989, August 13, 1991,
April 14, 1992, February 15, 1994, August 9, 1994 and
June 13, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (H)
4. None
5. Opinion of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman (legality) . . . 150
6-7. None
8. Opinion of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
(tax matters) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
9. None
10.a. First Merchants Bank Management Incentive Plan. . . . . . . (C)
b. Unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended . . . . . . (D)
c. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1989) . . . . . . . . . . . . (E)
d. 1989 Stock Option Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (F)
e. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1994) . . . . . . . . . . . . (G)
f. 1994 Stock Option Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (G)
II-1
<PAGE>
g. Agreement of Reorganization and Merger dated
January 24, 1996 between First Merchants Corporation
and Union National Bancorp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (H)
11-20.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . None
21. Subsidiaries of Registrant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (H)
22. None
23.a. Consent of Geo. S. Olive & Co., LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
b. Consent of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman (legality) . . . (I)
c. Consent of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
(tax matters) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (I)
d. Consent of Professional Bank Services, Inc. . . . . . . . . 155
24. Power of Attorney included in "Signatures" section. . . . . 145
25-28. None
99. Form of Proxy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
(b) All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable
or not required or because the required information is
included in the consolidated financial statements or
related notes.
(c) Fairness opinion furnished as part of prospectus.
- ----------------------------
(A) Included as Appendix A to the Prospectus.
(B) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1994.
(C) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 33-110) ordered
effective on September 30, 1988.
(D) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1990.
(E) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 33-28900) effective
on May 24, 1989.
(F) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 33-28901) effective
on May 24, 1989.
(G) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1993.
(H) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995.
(I) Included in opinion.
II-2
<PAGE>
ITEM 22. UNDERTAKINGS.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the
registrant's annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(b) (1) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows: that
prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered hereunder through
the use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement, by any
person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule
145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain the
information called for by the applicable registration form with respect to
reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.
(2) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that every
prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) immediately preceding
or (ii) that purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933, and is used in connection with an offering of securities
subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration
statement and will not be used until such amendment is effective, and that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(c) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling
persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise,
the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the
payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer,
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person
in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless
in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(d) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of
1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of a
registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h)
under the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of this registration
statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(e) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-3
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant
has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Muncie, State of Indiana,
as of the 8th day of April, 1996.
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
By /s/ Stefan S. Anderson
------------------------------------------
Stefan S. Anderson, President
Each person who signature appears below constitutes and appoints Stefan S.
Anderson and Larry R. Helms and each of them his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and
in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this Registration Statement, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents full power and authority to perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed as of the 8th day of April, 1996 by
the following persons in the capacities indicated.
/s/ Stefan S. Anderson
- ------------------------------
Stefan S. Anderson Chairman of the Board, President and Director
(Principal and Chief Executive Officer)
/s/ James L. Thrash
- ------------------------------
James L. Thrash Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Frank A. Bracken
- ------------------------------
Frank A. Bracken Director
/s/ Thomas B. Clark
- ------------------------------
Thomas B. Clark Director
/s/ Michael L. Cox
- ------------------------------
Michael L. Cox Director
/s/ David A. Galliher
- ------------------------------
David A. Galliher Director
/s/ Thomas K. Gardiner
- ------------------------------
Thomas K. Gardiner Director
S-1
<PAGE>
/s/ Hurley C. Goodall
- ------------------------------
Hurley C. Goodall Director
/s/ John W. Hartmeyer
- ------------------------------
John W. Hartmeyer Director
/s/ Nelson W. Heinrichs
- ------------------------------
Nelson W. Heinrichs Director
/s/ Jon H. Moll
- ------------------------------
Jon H. Moll Director
/s/ George A. Sissel
- ------------------------------
George A. Sissel Director
/s/ Robert M. Smitson
- ------------------------------
Robert M. Smitson Director
/s/ Joseph E. Wilson
- ------------------------------
Joseph E. Wilson Director
/s/ Robert F. Wisehart
- ------------------------------
Robert F. Wisehart Director
/s/ John E. Worthen
- ------------------------------
John E. Worthen Director
S-2
<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
------------------------
EXHIBITS
To
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of 1933
--------------------------
FIRST MERCHANTS CORPORATION
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a) The following Exhibits are being filed as part of this Registration
Statement:
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit Form S-4 Page
- ----------- ---------------------- -------------
1. None
2. Agreement of Reorganization and Merger. . . . . . . . (A)
3.a. Articles of Incorporation, dated
September 20, 1982, and the Articles of Amendment
thereto dated March 13, 1985 and March 14, 1988 . . . (B)
b. Bylaws and amendments thereto dated
February 12, 1985, February 20, 1987,
July 14, 1987, December 8, 1987,
December 13, 1988, November 14, 1989,
August 13, 1991, April 14, 1992,
February 15, 1994, August 9, 1994 and
June 13, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (H)
4. None
5. Opinion of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
(legality). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
6-7. None
8. Opinion of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
(tax matters) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
9. None
10.a. First Merchants Bank Management Incentive Plan. . . . (C)
b. Unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended . . . (D)
c. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1989) . . . . . . . . . (E)
d. 1989 Stock Option Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (F)
e. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1994) . . . . . . . . . (G)
f. 1994 Stock Option Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (G)
g. Agreement of Reorganization and Merger dated
January 24, 1996 between First Merchants
Corporation and Union National Bancorp. . . . . . . . (H)
11-20. None
21. Subsidiaries of Registrant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (H)
22. None
23.a. Consent of Geo. S. Olive & Co., LLC . . . . . . . . . 154
b. Consent of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
(legality). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (I)
c. Consent of Bingham Summers Welsh & Spilman
(tax matters) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (I)
d. Consent of Professional Bank Services, Inc. . . . . . 155
24. Power of Attorney included in "Signatures" section. . 145
25-28. None
99. Form of Proxy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
(b) All schedules are omitted because they are
not applicable or not required or because the
required information is included in the
consolidated financial statements or
related notes.
(c) Fairness opinion furnished as part of prospectus.
- ----------------------------
(A) Included as Appendix A to the Prospectus.
<PAGE>
(B) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1994.
(C) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 33-110) ordered
effective on September 30, 1988.
(D) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1990.
(E) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 33-28900) effective
on May 24, 1989.
(F) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 33-28901) effective
on May 24, 1989.
(G) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1993.
(H) Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995.
(I) Included in opinion.
<PAGE>
April 8, 1996
First Merchants Corporation
200 East Jackson Street
Muncie, Indiana 47305
Gentlemen:
You have requested our opinion in connection with the proposed public
offering by First Merchants Corporation, an Indiana corporation (the "Company"),
of up to 565,705 shares of common stock ("Shares") covered by a Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about April 8, 1996.
In connection with your request to us, we have been provided with the
following:
1. The Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Company;
2. The minute book of the Company; and
3. A certificate from the Indiana Secretary of State
certifying that the Company is a corporation duly organized
and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State
of Indiana.
For purposes of this opinion, we have examined the above documents and
have relied upon them as to matters of fact. We have not independently checked
to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information set forth or certified
in such documents.
Based solely upon the foregoing documents and examination, and subject to
the foregoing limitations and qualifications, we are of the opinion that:
1. As of this date, the Company is a duly organized and
existing corporation under the laws of the State of Indiana
with the corporate power and authority to conduct its
business as described in the Registration Statement; and
2. The Shares, when issued as contemplated by the Registration
Statement in exchange for payment therefor, will be validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement and to the reference made to us in the Registration Statement and
Proxy Statement-Prospectus forming a part thereof under the caption "Legal
Opinions." By giving this consent, we do not admit that we come within the
category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission thereunder.
Very truly yours,
BINGHAM SUMMERS WELSH & SPILMAN
Ex. 5-1
<PAGE>
April 8, 1996
Board of Directors
First Merchants Corporation
200 E. Jackson Street, Box 792
Muncie, IN 47305
Board of Directors
Randolph County Bancorp
122 West Washington Street
Winchester, IN 47394
Re: Merger of Randolph County Bancorp with and into First Merchants
Corporation
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as special counsel to First Merchants Corporation, an
Indiana corporation registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956 ("First Merchants"), in connection with the proposed merger
of Randolph County Bancorp, an Indiana corporation registered as a bank holding
company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 ("Randolph County"), with and
into First Merchants, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement of Reorganization
and Merger between First Merchants and Randolph County, dated January 17, 1996
("Merger Agreement"), as described in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 to
be filed by First Merchants with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about April 8, 1996 ("Registration Statement").
This opinion is being rendered as required by Section 9 of the Merger
Agreement. All capitalized terms herein, unless otherwise specified, have the
meaning assigned to them in the Registration Statement.
In connection with this opinion, we have relied on and have examined, and
we are familiar with originals or copies of, certified or otherwise identified
to our satisfaction, the (i) Merger Agreement, the (ii) Registration Statement,
and (iii) such other documents as we have deemed necessary or appropriate in
order to enable us to render the opinions below. In our examination, we have
assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of all natural
persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the
conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as certified,
conformed or photostatic copies and the authenticity of the originals of such
copies. This opinion is subject to the receipt by us prior to the effective time
of the Merger of certain written representations and covenants of Randolph
County and First Merchants, the accuracy and truthfulness of which we shall
assume and rely upon without investigation.
In rendering our opinion, we have considered the applicable provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), Treasury
Regulations, pertinent judicial authorities, interpretive rulings of the
Internal Revenue Service and such other authorities as we have considered
relevant.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, provided that the merger of
Randolph County with and into First Merchants qualifies as a statutory merger
under applicable state law, and assuming that (i) after the transaction, First
Ex. 8-1
<PAGE>
Board of Directors
April 8, 1996
Page 2
Merchants, as successor of Randolph County, will hold substantially all of its
assets, and that (ii) in the transaction, the Randolph County shareholders will
exchange an amount of stock constituting majority control of Randolph County
solely for First Merchants common stock, we are of the opinion that the Merger
will, under current law, constitute a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code and that Randolph County and First Merchants
will each be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b)
of the Code. As a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code, the
Merger will have the following federal income tax consequences for Randolph
County shareholders, Randolph County, and First Merchants:
1. No gain or loss will be recognized by Randolph County
shareholders who exchange all of their Randolph County common stock for
First Merchants common stock pursuant to the Merger, except to the extent
of gain or loss attributable to any cash received in lieu of receipt of a
fractional share of First Merchants common stock.
2. The basis of First Merchants common stock (including deemed
fractional share interests) received by Randolph County shareholders who
exchange all of their Randolph County common stock for First Merchants
common stock will be the same as the basis of the Randolph County common
stock surrendered in exchange therefor.
3. The holding period of the First Merchants common stock
received by the Randolph County shareholders (including deemed fractional
share interests) who exchange all of their Randolph County common stock
for First Merchants common stock will include the period during which the
Randolph County common stock was held, provided the Randolph County
common stock was held as a capital asset on the date of the exchange.
4. Where a cash payment is received by a Randolph County
shareholder in lieu of fractional shares of First Merchants common stock,
the cash payment will be treated as a distribution in redemption of the
deemed fractional share interest by First Merchants, subject to the
provisions and limitations of Section 302 of the Code. Where such
exchange qualifies under Section 302(a) of the Code, such shareholder
will recognize a capital gain or loss provided that the Randolph County
common stock was held as a capital asset on the date of the Merger.
5. Any Randolph County shareholder who perfects dissenter's
rights and receives solely cash in exchange for such shareholder's
Randolph County common stock shall be treated as having received such
cash as a distribution in redemption of the Randolph County common stock
subject to the provisions and limitations of Section 302 of the Code. If,
as a result of such distribution, such Randolph County shareholder owns
no First Merchants common stock, either directly or through the
application of the constructive ownership rules of Section 318(a) of the
Code, the redemption will be a complete termination of interest within
the meaning of Section 302(b)(3) of the Code and the cash will be treated
as a distribution in full payment and exchange for the Randolph County
common stock as provided in Section 302(a) of the Code. Under Section
1001 of the
Ex. 8-2
<PAGE>
Board of Directors
April 8, 1996
Page 3
Code, gain or loss (subject to any applicable limitations of the Code)
will be realized and recognized by such Randolph County shareholder in an
amount equal to the difference between the redemption price and the
adjusted basis of the Randolph County common stock surrendered in
exchange therefor.
6. No gain or loss will be recognized by Randolph County or
First Merchants in connection with the transaction.
7. The basis of the assets of Randolph County acquired by First
Merchants in the Merger will be the same as the basis of such assets in
the hands of Randolph County immediately prior to the Merger.
The opinions expressed herein represent our conclusions as to the
application of existing federal income tax law to the facts as presented to us,
and we give no assurance that changes in such law or any interpretation thereof
will not affect the opinions expressed by us. Moreover, there can be no
assurance that these opinions will not be challenged by the Internal Revenue
Service or that a court considering the issues will not hold contrary to such
opinions. We express no opinion on the treatment of this transaction under the
income tax laws of any state or other taxing jurisdictions. We assume no
obligation to advise of any changes concerning the above, whether or not deemed
material, which may hereafter come or be brought to our attention.
Except as set forth above, we express no opinion as to the tax
consequences to any party, whether federal, state, local or foreign, of the
Merger or of any transactions related to the Merger or contemplated by the
Merger Agreement. This opinion is addressed to you and is being furnished to you
solely for your use in connection with the transaction that is the subject of
the Merger Agreement. We assume no professional responsibility to any other
person or entity. Accordingly, the opinions expressed herein are not to be
utilized or quoted by, delivered or disclosed to, in whole or in part, any other
person, corporation, entity or governmental authority, or for any other purpose,
without the prior written consent of this Firm. We hereby consent to the filing
of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.
Very truly yours,
BINGHAM SUMMERS WELSH & SPILMAN
Ex. 8-3
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference and the inclusion of our reports
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the following
companies:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Report Date
-----------
<S> <C>
First Merchants Corporation
and subsidiaries January 19, 1996, except for Note 2
as to which the date is January 24,
1996
Randolph County Bancorp and subsidiary January 17, 1996, except for the
last paragraph of the note on Loans
and Allowance as to which the date
is March 19, 1996
Union National Bancorp and subsidiary February 2, 1996
</TABLE>
included and incorporated by reference herein and to the reference to our firm
under the heading "Experts" in the Registration Statement.
/s/ Geo. S. Olive & Co., LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana
April 5, 1996
Ex. 23(a)-1
<PAGE>
PROFESSIONAL BANK SERVICES, INC.
April 5, 1996
CONSENT OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR
We consent to the use of our opinion letter as an appendix to the Proxy
Statement-Prospectus which forms a part of this Registration Statement on Form
S-4 and to the references to our firm in the Registration Statement on Form S-4.
/s/ Professional Bank Services, Inc.
PROFESSIONAL BANK SERVICES, INC.
Ex. 23(d)-1
<PAGE>
PROXY
RANDOLPH COUNTY BANCORP
122 W. Washington Street
Winchester, IN 47394
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints _____________________ and _____________________,
and each of them, proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution
and re-substitution, to represent and vote all shares of common stock of
Randolph County Bancorp ("Randolph County") which the undersigned would be
entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of Shareholders of Randolph County to be
held at the main office of The Randolph County Bank located at 122 West
Washington Street, Winchester, Indiana 47394, on ______________, ______________
___, 1996, at _____ __.m. local time, and at any adjournment thereof, with all
of the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present, as set forth
below.
The Board of Directors of Randolph County recommends a vote FOR approval of the
Agreement of Reorganization and Merger dated January 17, 1996, by and between
First Merchants Corporation ("First Merchants") and Randolph County pursuant to
which Randolph County will merge with and into First Merchants, and The Randolph
County Bank will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Merchants.
1. Approval of the Agreement of Reorganization and Merger:
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
------ ------ -----
2. In their discretion, on such other matters as may properly be
presented at the Special Meeting.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, BUT IF NOT OTHERWISE DIRECTED, THIS PROXY
WILL BE VOTED FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT OF REORGANIZATION AND MERGER. ON
ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY BE PRESENTED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY.
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY.
Dated: ______________, 1996
_______________________________
(SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER)
_______________________________
(SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER)
PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME APPEARS ON YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATE. JOINT
OWNERS SHOULD EACH SIGN PERSONALLY. TRUSTEES AND OTHERS SIGNING IN A
REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY SHOULD INDICATE THE CAPACITY IN WHICH THEY SIGN.
Ex. 99-1
