PHARMOS CORP
S-3/A, 1995-12-29
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
Previous: CREATIVE COMPUTER APPLICATIONS INC, DEF 14A, 1995-12-29
Next: INTERFACE SYSTEMS INC, 10-K405, 1995-12-29




   
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 1995

                                                     Registration No. 33-64289  
    
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

   
                           AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM S-3
    
                             REGISTRATION STATEMENT 
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED


                               PHARMOS CORPORATION
                               -------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

             Nevada                         36-3207413
             ------                         ----------
  (State or other jurisdiction             (I.R.S. Employer
 of incorporation or organization)         Identification No.)
          


                               2 Innovation Drive
                             Alachua, Florida 32615
                                 (904) 462-1210

          (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
             area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)

                           ---------------------------

                                 S. COLIN NEILL
                               2 Innovation Drive
                             Alachua, Florida 32615
                                 (904) 462-1210
                (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone
               number, including area code, of agent for service) 


                           ---------------------------

                                   Copies to:
                             ADAM D. EILENBERG, ESQ.
                         Fitzpatrick Eilenberg & Zivian
                          666 Third Avenue, 30th Floor
                            New York, New York  10017

                           ---------------------------

     Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public:  As soon as
practicable after the effective date of the registration statement
      
      If the only securities being registered on this Form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following
box. |   |
      ---

      If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered
on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act
of 1933, other than securities offered in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box.  | X |
                                               ---


<PAGE>

                               CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
                               -------------------------------
<TABLE><CAPTION>

                                                Proposed
                                                Maximum         Proposed
                                                Offering        Maximum         Amount of
Title of Each Class of          Amount to be    Price Per       Aggregate       Registration
Securities to be Registered     Registered      Unit            Price           Fee
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                              <C>                <C>           <C>               <C>
Shares of Common stock to be        6,000,000         $1.84(2)     $11,040,000           $3807
sold by Selling Security
holders(1)

Shares of Common Stock                900,000         $1.80         $1,620,000            $559
issuable upon exercise of
Warrants to purchase 900,000
Shares at $1.80 per share*
Shares of Common Stock                 10,000         $0.78             $7,800              $3
issuable upon exercise of
Warrants to purchase 10,000
Shares at $.78 per share*

Shares of Common Stock                 50,000         $0.75            $37,500             $13
issuable upon exercise of
Warrants to purchase 50,000
Shares at $.75 per share*

Shares of Common Stock                 50,000         $1.00            $50,000             $17
issuable upon exercise of
Warrants to purchase 50,000
Shares at $1.00 per share*
Shares of Common Stock                 50,000         $1.50            $75,000             $26
issuable upon exercise of
Warrants to purchase 50,000
Shares at $1.50 per share*

Shares of Common Stock                 10,000         $1.88            $18,800              $6
issuable upon exercise of
Warrants to purchase 10,000
Shares at $1.88 per share*
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Registration Fee                                             $12,849,100          $4,431

</TABLE>

(1)            To be offered by selling security holders, at their discretion,
               from time to time over a period of three years from the effective
               date of this Registration Statement, at prevailing market prices
               at time of sale.

(2)            Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
               fee.  Proposed maximum offering price per share is estimated
               based upon the average of the high and low prices of the
               Company's Common Stock listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on
               November 10, 1995.

*              The amount of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants may
               be increased solely to account for applicable anti-dilution
               adjustments, if any.

     The registrant hereby amends the registration statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall
file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration
statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a),
may determine.                                        2

<PAGE>


                               PHARMOS CORPORATION

Cross Reference Sheet Showing Location in Prospectus of Information Required
Therein by 
Item 1 through 13 of Form S-3

      Registration Statement                         Prospectus Caption
          Item and Heading                               of Location    
      -----------------------                        -------------------

          1. Forepart of the Registration
             Statement and Outside Front
             Cover Page of Prospectus   . . . . . Outside Front Cover

          2. Inside Front and Outside Back
             Cover Pages and Prospectus   . . . . Inside Front Cover Page

          3. Summary Information, 
             Prospectus Summary
             and Ratio of Earnings to             Outside Front Cover,
             Fixed Charges  . . . . . . . . . . . Risk Factors

          4. Use of Proceeds  . . . . . . . . . . Use of Proceeds

          5. Determination of Offering Price  . . Cover Page

          6. Dilution   . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dilution

          7. Selling Security Holders   . . . . . Selling Security Holders

          8. Plan of Distribution   . . . . . . . Cover Page, Plan of 
                . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution

          9. Description of the Securities to
             be Registered  . . . . . . . . . . . Description of Securities

         10. Interest of Named Experts and 
             Counsel  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Experts

         11. Material Changes   . . . . . . . . . Recent Developments

         12. Incorporation of Certain
             Information by Reference   . . . . . Incorporation of Certain
                                                  Documents by Reference

         13. Disclosure of Commission Position
             on Indemnification for Securities
             Act Liabilities  . . . . . . . . . . Commission's Policy on
                                                  Indemnification for Securities
                                                  Act Liabilities
                                        3





<PAGE>



   
                             SUBJECT TO COMPLETION,
                             DATED DECEMBER 29, 1995
    

INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT.  A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.  THESE SECURITIES MAY INTO BE SOLD NOR MAY
OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES
EFFECTIVE.  THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES
IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR
TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE.

                               PHARMOS CORPORATION


                        6,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK,
                          $.03 PAR VALUE, TO BE SOLD BY
                            SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS

                    900,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE 
                  UPON EXERCISE OF WARRANTS TO PURCHASE SHARES 
                     AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $1.80 PER SHARE

                     10,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE 
                  UPON EXERCISE OF WARRANTS TO PURCHASE SHARES 
                     AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $0.78 PER SHARE

                     50,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE 
                  UPON EXERCISE OF WARRANTS TO PURCHASE SHARES 
                     AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $0.75 PER SHARE

                     50,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE 
                  UPON EXERCISE OF WARRANTS TO PURCHASE SHARES 
                     AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $1.00 PER SHARE

                     50,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE 
                  UPON EXERCISE OF WARRANTS TO PURCHASE SHARES 
                     AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $1.50 PER SHARE

                     10,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUABLE 
                  UPON EXERCISE OF WARRANTS TO PURCHASE SHARES 
                     AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $1.88 PER SHARE


     This Prospectus covers the proposed offer and resale of up to 6,000,000
shares (the "Shares") of common stock, par value $.03 ("Common Stock") of
Pharmos Corporation (the 
<PAGE>



"Company") held by stockholders (the "Selling Stockholders") who purchased such
Shares in a private placement transaction in September 1995 (the "Private
Placement Transaction"). 

     This Prospectus also covers the offer and proposed sale by the Company of
up to        (i) 900,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise by
the holders thereof of warrants to purchase 900,000 shares (which amount may
increase solely to account for applicable anti-dilution adjustments, if any) at
an exercise price of $1.80 per share issued to the Selling Stockholders and to
two finders in connection with the Private Placement Transaction; (ii) 10,000
shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise by the holder thereof of
warrants to purchase 10,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.78 per share
issued to the Company's financial advisor in connection with the Company's
acquisition of Oculon Corporation in April 1995; (iii) 150,000 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise by the holder thereof of warrants to purchase
150,000 shares issued to the Company's investment banker\financial consultant
and exercisable as follows: 50,000 of such warrants are exercisable at a price
of $0.75 per share, 50,000 of such warrants are exercisable at a price of $1.00
per share, and 50,000 of such warrants are exercisable at a price of $1.50 per
share; and (iv) 10,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise by the
holder thereof of warrants to purchase 10,000 shares at an exercise price of
$1.88 per share issued to the Company's Acting Chief Financial Officer in
connection with his efforts on behalf of the Company in the Private Placement
Transaction.  (All of the warrants set forth above are hereinafter separately
and collectively referred to as the "Warrants" and the shares of Common Stock
issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants are hereinafter separately and
collectively referred to as the "Warrant Shares.")

     In connection with this offering, the Selling Stockholders and certain
holders of the Warrants who may be deemed to be "affiliates" of the Company, as
that term is defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"),
may be deemed to be an "underwriter," as that term is defined under the Act, of
the Shares or Warrant Shares offered hereby.  It is anticipated that the Selling
Stockholders and such affiliates intend to sell the Shares or Warrant Shares
offered hereby from time to time for their own respective accounts in the open
market at the prices prevailing therein or in individually negotiated
transactions at such prices as may be agreed upon.  Each Selling Stockholder and
such affiliate will bear all expenses with respect to the offering of the Shares
or Warrant Shares offered hereby by him except the costs of legal counsel and
costs associated with registering such shares under the Act and preparing and
printing this Prospectus.

     The net proceeds from Shares to be sold by the Selling Stockholders (and by
holders of Warrant Shares who exercise their Warrants) will inure entirely to
their benefit and not that of the Company; however the Company will receive
proceeds from the exercise of the Warrants. 

   
     The Company's Common Stock is traded on the over-the-counter market and is
quoted on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbol "PARS"  The closing price
of the Company's Common Stock on December 28, 1995 was $1.44.
    



                                      (ii)

<PAGE>


THESE SECURITIES INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION AS
DESCRIBED HEREIN (SEE "RISK FACTORS" AND "DILUTION").

THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS.  ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS
A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

           The date of this Prospectus is ____________________, 1995.

                                      (iii)

<PAGE>

     The laws of many states  provide exemptions from registration, particularly
for sales of securities by  persons other than issuers,  such as the certain  of
the  Selling Stockholders and holders of the Warrants, who do not have a control
relationship with the issuer, and  for the subsequent resale of such  securities
by purchasers  thereof.  Purchasers  hereunder should consult with  their broker
and/or attorney to determine whether applicable state laws permit such purchases
and resales by them.

     With respect  to the  proposed sale  of the  Shares offered  hereby by  the
Selling Stockholders  and the  sale of the  Warrant Shares  by the  Company upon
exercise  of  the Warrants,  the  Company  is  taking steps  to  register  these
securities or  permit such  sales pursuant to  exemption from  registration only
under the laws of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Kentucky, Pennsylvania, New  Jersey and New  York.  However,  if holders of  the
Shares are not  residents of the aforementioned states, such holders will not be
able to resell their  Shares in any other states, including the  states in which
they reside.  In such event, such  holders must arrange either (i) to sell their
Shares  (through a broker/dealer or otherwise) only to  a resident of one of the
aforementioned states  or to an  entity, such  as a broker/dealer  registered in
such state, which may be exempt under applicable state laws, or (ii) pursuant to
another applicable exemption.  In such  event, the Company will only permit  the
transfer of  the Shares if its transfer agent  receives a certification from the
holder that  the sale was made to a resident of one of the aforementioned states
or to  a state registered  broker/dealer or the  Company receives an  opinion of
counsel, satisfactory to the Company's counsel, that the resale of the Shares is
otherwise exempt from registration under applicable state law. 

     With respect to the proposed sale of the Warrant  Shares, if holders of the
Warrants are not residents of the aforementioned states, the Company will not be
                                                         -----------------------
able to  permit them  to exercise  Warrants held  by them,  unless such  holders
- ----------------------------------------------------------
obtain an opinion of  counsel, satisfactory to the Company's counsel,  that such
transaction is exempt  from registration.  Under such  circumstances, their only
alternatives may be to sell their Warrants and/or  Common Stock to a resident of
the aforementioned states or to sell their Warrants and/or Warrant Shares  to an
entity, such as  a registered broker-dealer in  such state, which may  be exempt
under applicable state laws.

     Holders of  the Warrants  and/or Warrant Shares  should consult  with their
broker and/or attorney  to determine what actions should be taken to comply with
the laws of their  state with respect to any Warrants and/or Warrant Shares held
by them and, specifically with respect to  the Warrants, ensure that such action
is taken  well prior  to the  respective expiration  dates of  the Warrants,  if
necessary.

     The  Company  will  furnish  to each  person  to  whom  this Prospectus  is
delivered, upon written request, a copy of any  or all of the documents referred
to by reference, other than exhibits to  such documents unless such exhibits are
specifically incorporated herein by reference.  Requests should be addressed to:
Mr.  S. Colin  Neill, Acting  Chief  Financial Officer,  Pharmos Corporation,  2
Innovation Drive, Alachua, Florida 32615, (904) 462-1210.
                                      (iv)


<PAGE>

     NO  DEALER,  SALESMAN  OR OTHER  PERSON  HAS  BEEN AUTHORIZED  TO  GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR  TO MAKE ANY  REPRESENTATION OTHER  THAN THOSE CONTAINED  IN THIS
PROSPECTUS.  ANY INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION NOT HEREIN CONTAINED, IF GIVEN OR
MADE, MUST NOT BE RELIED  UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED  BY THE COMPANY.   THIS
PROSPECTUS  DOES NOT  CONSTITUTE  AN OFFER  OR  SOLICITATION IN  RESPECT  OF THE
SECURITIES  IN ANY  JURISDICTION IN  WHICH SUCH  OFFER OR SOLICITATION  WOULD BE
UNLAWFUL.   DELIVERY  OF THIS  PROSPECTUS  SHALL NOT,  UNDER ANY  CIRCUMSTANCES,
CREATE ANY  IMPLICATION THAT  THERE HAS  BEEN NO  CHANGE IN  THE AFFAIRS OF  THE
COMPANY SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS.





                                       (v)

<PAGE>

                             ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

     The  Company has  filed with  the Securities  and Exchange  Commission, 450
Fifth Street, Washington, D.C. 20549, a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under
the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the securities offered  hereby.  This
Prospectus filed as part of such Registration Statement does not contain all the
information set forth in, or annexed as exhibits to, the Registration Statement.
For  further information  pertaining to  the securities  offered hereby  and the
Company,  reference is  made  to  the Registration  Statement  and the  exhibits
thereto.   The Registration Statement  and exhibits thereto may  be inspected at
the Headquarters Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission located at 450
Fifth  Street, N.W.,  Room 1024, Washington,  D.C. 20549  and at certain  of the
Commission's regional  offices at  the following addresses:  75 Park  Place, New
York, New York; Room  1204, S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60604; and Suite 500
East, 5757 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles,  CA 90036.  Copies of such  material may
be obtained from the  Public Reference Section of the SEC, at  450 Fifth Street,
N.W., Room 1024, Washington, D.C. at prescribed rates.  The statements contained
in this Prospectus  concerning the contents of any contract or document referred
to are not necessarily complete, and in each instance, reference is made to such
contract or document  filed as an  exhibit to  the Registration Statement,  each
statement being qualified in all respects by provisions of such exhibit to which
reference is hereby made for a full statement of the provisions thereof.
                                      (vi)

<PAGE>

                                   THE COMPANY

     The Company is engaged in the development of novel pharmaceuticals based on
innovative drug delivery technologies targeting diseases of the eye, principally
ocular inflammation, and the brain, principally stroke and head trauma.

     Its leading  product, LotemaxTM,  is an  ophthalmic anti-inflammatory  drug
designed with  the Company's proprietary  "site active" delivery system  and has
demonstrated significant  efficacy in a  series of completed Phase  III clinical
trials and  a uniquely superior  safety profile compared to  currently available
ophthalmic steroids.  The  Company has completed the submission of  its New Drug
Application  ("NDA") for  LotemaxTM to  the  U.S. Food  and Drug  Administration
("FDA").

     The  Company's principal  executive  offices are  located  at 2  Innovation
Drive, Alachua, Florida 32615, telephone (904) 462-1210.

                                  RISK FACTORS
     The  Common Stock  being offered  hereby involves  a high  degree of  risk.
Prospective  investors should carefully  consider the following  risk factors in
addition to  other information  contained in this  Prospectus, in  evaluating an
investment in the shares of Common Stock offered hereby. 

Early Stage of Development; Technological Uncertainty

     Pharmos is at an early stage of development.  Apart from LotemaxTM, most of
the Company's other potential products are early in the research and development
phase,  and product  revenues may  not be  realized from  the sale  of  any such
products for at least the next several years,  if at all.  Many of the Company's
proposed products will  require significant additional research  and development
efforts  prior to  any  commercial  use,  including  extensive  preclinical  and
clinical  testing as  well as  lengthy  regulatory approval.   There  can  be no
assurance  that  the  Company's   research  and  development  efforts   will  be
successful,  that the  Company's potential  products will  prove to be  safe and
effective in clinical  trials or that any commercially  successful products will
ultimately be developed by the Company.

History of Operating Losses; Accumulated Deficit

     The  Company  has  experienced  significant   operating  losses  since  its
inception.  As of September  30, 1995, the Company had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $53 million.  The  Company expects to incur operating losses  over
at  least  the next  several  years as  the  Company's research  and development
efforts and preclinical and clinical testing activities continue.  The Company's
ability to achieve profitability depends in part upon its ability, alone or with
others, to successfully commercialize and receive approval on its first proposed
product,  to complete  development of  its  other proposed  products, to  obtain
required regulatory approvals and to manufacture and market such products.

<PAGE>

Future Capital Needs; Uncertainty of Additional Financing

     The Company's operations to date have consumed substantial amounts of cash.
The development of the Company's  technology and potential products will require
a  commitment of  substantial funds  to  conduct the  costly and  time-consuming
research necessary to  develop and optimize such technology,  and ultimately, to
establish  manufacturing  and  marketing  capabilities.   The  Company's  future
capital requirements will depend on many factors, including continued scientific
progress in the  research and development of  the Company's technology and  drug
programs, the  ability of  the Company to  establish and  maintain collaborative
arrangements with others  for drug  development, progress  with preclinical  and
clinical trials, the time and  costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals,
the  costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing
patent  claims, competing technological and  market developments, changes in its
existing  research   relationships  and   effective  product   commercialization
activities and arrangements.

     The Company  believes that its  current cash resources and  interest income
thereon, including approximately  $8.1 million in net cash  and cash equivalents
received by the  Company from the Private Placement  Transaction and contractual
amounts due from Bausch & Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Bausch & Lomb") under the
Company's marketing and manufacturing agreement  with Bausch & Lomb (See "Recent
Developments"), should be sufficient to  fund its operating expenses and capital
requirements  as currently  planned through  March 1997.  The Company  will seek
additional funding through  collaborative arrangements or through  future public
or private equity or debt financing.   There can be no assurance that additional
financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all.  If additional funds
are raised  by issuing equity  securities, further dilution to  stockholders may
result.  If  adequate funds are  not available, the Company  may be required  to
delay,  reduce  the  scope of  or  eliminate  one  or more  of  its  research or
development programs  or to obtain funds through arrangements with collaborative
partners or others that may require the Company to relinquish rights  to certain
of  its technologies,  product candidates  or  products that  the Company  would
otherwise seek to develop or commercialize itself. 

Dependence on Potential Collaborative Partners

     The   Company's   strategy   for   the   development,   clinical   testing,
manufacturing,  marketing and  commercialization  of  certain  of  its  products
includes  entering   into  various  collaborations   with  corporate   partners,
licensors, licensees  and others.   To  date, the  Company has  entered into  an
agreement  with  Bausch &  Lomb  to  manufacture and  market  its  lead product,
LotemaxTM,  in the United States.   The agreement also covers the co-development
of LotemaxTM  line extension products  currently being developed by  the Company
(See "Recent Developments").  There can be no assurance that the Company will be
able  to  negotiate  any  future   collaborative  agreement  with  companies  on
acceptable terms, or that any present or future collaborative agreements will be
successful.  To  the extent that  the Company chooses not  to or is not  able to
establish   such  arrangements, the  Company would experience  increased capital
requirements to undertake such activities at its own expense.  In  addition, the
Company may encounter significant delays in 

                                        2
<PAGE>


introducing  its  proposed  products currently  under  development  into certain
markets or find  that the  development, manufacture,  or sale of  its   proposed
products  in  such  markets  is  adversely  affected  by  the  absence  of  such
collaborative agreements.

Technological Change and Competition

     The   pharmaceutical  industry  is  subject  to  rapid,  unpredictable  and
significant  technological  change.    Competition  from universities,  research
institutions and other  pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology  companies is
intense.    Many competitors  or  potential competitors  have  greater financial
resources,  research   and  development  capabilities,  and   manufacturing  and
marketing  experience than the  Company.  To  this end, the  Company has entered
into  an  agreement with  Bausch &  Lomb  for the  manufacture and  marketing of
LotemaxTM  (See  "Recent  Developments").    There  can  be  no  assurance  that
developments by  the  Company's competitors  or potential  competitors will  not
render  the  Company's technology  or  proposed applications  of  its technology
obsolete.

Technologies Subject to Licenses

     As a  licensee of  certain research technologies,  the Company  has various
license agreements with certain U.S.  federal agencies and the State  of Israel,
certain universities and Dr.  Nicholas Bodor, a former  director of the  Company
(who previously  was also a vice president of  the Company), wherein the Company
has  acquired  exclusive and  coexclusive  rights to  develop  and commercialize
certain research technologies.  The  agreements generally require the Company to
pay royalties on sale  of products developed from the  licensed technologies and
fees  on  revenues from  sublicensees,  where  applicable,  and the  Company  is
responsible for  the costs of  filing and  prosecuting patent applications.   In
addition,  some of  the Company's  license agreements  require that  the Company
commit  certain sums  annually  for  research and  development  of the  licensed
products.  The  Company's license agreements with the  University of Florida and
with  Dr. Bodor require  the Company to  pay annual license  maintenance fees as
well as make  payments upon  completion of certain  milestones occurring in  the
clinical  trials  of  certain  licensed  products.   The  Company  is  currently
negotiating the modification of its agreement with the University of Florida and
is involved in litigation with Dr. Bodor relating to its agreement with him (see
"Legal Proceedings and Disputes").  

     The exclusivity of license agreements generally expires fifteen years after
the  later  of commercialization  or  the effectiveness  of the  patents.   Each
agreement  is terminable  by  either party,  upon  notice,  if the  other  party
defaults in its obligations.

Uncertainty of Protection of Patents and Proprietary Rights

     The Company's success  will depend in large  part on its ability  to obtain
patents,  maintain  trade   secrets  and  operate  without  infringing   on  the
proprietary rights  of others, both  in the  U.S. and in  other countries.   The
patent positions of pharmaceutical companies can be highly uncertain and involve
complex legal and factual questions, and therefore the breadth and





                                        3
<PAGE>


enforceability of claims allowed in  pharmaceutical patents cannot be predicted.
There can  be  no assurance  that any  issued  or pending  patents  will not  be
challenged,  invalidated or circumvented, or that  the rights granted thereunder
will provide proprietary protection or competitive advantages to the Company.  

     The commercial success of the Company also will depend, in part, on Pharmos
not  infringing  patents issued  to  others  and  not breaching  the  technology
licenses upon which any Company products are based.  It is uncertain whether any
third-party patents will require the Company to alter its products or processes,
obtain licenses or cease certain activities.  In addition, if patents are issued
to others which  contain competitive or conflicting claims,  and such claims are
ultimately  determined to  be  valid,  the Company  may  be required  to  obtain
licenses to these  patents or to develop  or obtain alternative technology.   If
any licenses are required,  there can be no  assurance that the Company will  be
able to  obtain any such  licenses on commercially  favorable terms, if  at all.
The  Company's breach of an  existing license or failure to  obtain a license to
any technology that  it may  require to  commercialize its products  may have  a
material adverse  impact on  the Company.   Litigation,  which  could result  in
substantial costs  to the Company, may also be  necessary to enforce any patents
licensed or issued  to the  Company or to  determine the scope  and validity  of
third-party proprietary rights.  If competitors of the Company  prepare and file
patent applications  in  the U.S.  that  claim technology  also  claimed by  the
Company,  the  Company may  have  to  participate  in  interference  proceedings
declared  by  the U.S.  Patent and  Trademark  Office to  determine  priority of
invention, which  could result in substantial costs to  the Company, even if the
eventual outcome is favorable to the Company.   An adverse outcome could subject
the Company to significant liabilities to third parties, require disputed rights
to  be licensed from  third parties or  require the Company to  cease using such
technology.

     The Company  also relies on  secrecy to protect its  technology, especially
where patent protection is not believed to  be appropriate or obtainable.  Thus,
Pharmos  protects  its  proprietary  technology   and  processes,  in  part,  by
confidentiality   agreements  with   its  employees,  consultants   and  certain
contractors.    There can  be no  assurance  that these  agreements will  not be
breached, that the  Company would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that
the Company's trade secrets will not otherwise become  known or be independently
discovered by competitors.

Legal Proceedings and Disputes

     The  Company recently  commenced an  action against  Dr. Nicholas  Bodor, a
former director  of the  Company, seeking to  enjoin Dr.  Bodor from  taking any
steps to  terminate or  interfere with the  Company's rights  under its  License
Agreement with  Dr. Bodor  relating to  LotemaxTM.   Dr. Bodor  claims that  the
advances against future  revenues of LotemaxTM recently received  by the Company
under its Marketing Agreement with Bausch & Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are an up
front licensing fee of which Dr. Bodor is entitled to receive a portion and that
the  failure to  pay would constitute  grounds for  his terminating  the License
Agreement.  Dr.  Bodor also claims  that the Marketing  Agreement is actually  a
sublicense  entitling  Dr.  Bodor  to additional  royalties  under  his  License
Agreement.  The Company strongly disagrees with Dr. 





                                        4
<PAGE>

Bodor's characterization of  the Bausch & Lomb Marketing  Agreement and believes
his  interpretation is incorrect  and has no  merit.  To prevent  Dr. Bodor from
wrongfully  terminating the License Agreement, the  Company commenced the action
to protect  its  rights under  both  the  License Agreement  and  the  Marketing
Agreement  (See "Recent Developments").
  
     The Company is also involved in separate disputes with two of its licensors
regarding the applicability  of the Company's license to a  new technology being
developed by  the licensor and  the priority of  a licensed  patent.  While  the
Company believes that its position is correct in both of these disputes and that
it will prevail,  an adverse determination  or resolution of  both or either  of
them could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its operations.

     The Company  has been  named as  an additional  co-defendant in  an amended
complaint filed in a pending purported class action suit against David Blech, D.
Blech &  Co. and a number of other  defendants, including eleven publicly traded
biotechnology  companies.   The  complaint  seeks damages  for  alleged unlawful
manipulation of  the stock market  prices of the named  biotechnology companies.
The Company believes that the claims  against it have no factual or legal  basis
and are without  merit and  has filed a  motion to dismiss  the claims  asserted
against it (See "Recent Developments").

Extensive Government Regulation

     The Company's  products require the approval of the  FDA before they can be
marketed in  the U.S.   In  addition, approvals  are also  required from  health
authorities  in most  foreign countries  before  the Company's  products can  be
marketed in such countries.  Before an NDA,  a type of submission used to obtain
FDA approval to  market a new  drug, can be filed  with the FDA, a  product must
undergo, among other things, extensive animal testing and human clinical trials,
which can take up to seven years to complete.  Except for LotemaxTM, the Company
has  not yet  filed NDAs  on its  products.   The  time required  for regulatory
approval of the Company's products after  acceptance for filing an NDA can  vary
and is usually one  to three years or more,  and the FDA may require  additional
animal studies and/or clinical trials before granting approval.  There can be no
assurance that  the FDA and foreign  regulatory agencies will be  satisfied with
the information,  including that  emanating from  clinical trials,  submitted to
them in applications (like NDAs) seeking approval and will approve the marketing
of any of the Company's potential products, or that problems will not arise that
could delay or prevent the commercialization of the Company's future products.  

     There can be  no assurance  that any  potential products  developed by  the
Company  alone or  in conjunction  with others  will be  proven to  be safe  and
effective in  clinical trials  and will meet  all of  the applicable  regulatory
requirements  needed   to  receive  marketing  approval.    Data  obtained  from
preclinical  testing  and   clinical  trials  can  be   susceptible  to  varying
interpretations which  could delay, limit  or prevent regulatory approvals.   In
addition, delays  or  disapprovals  may  be encountered  based  upon  additional
government regulation resulting from future legislation or administrative action
or changes in FDA policy  made during the period of product development  and FDA
regulatory review.  Similar delays may also be encountered in foreign

                                         5

<PAGE>


countries.    There  can  be  no  assurance  that  even  after  such   time  and
expenditures, regulatory approval  will be obtained  for any potential  products
developed  by the Company.  If regulatory approval of a product is granted, such
approval  will be limited  to those therapeutic  uses for which  the product has
been  demonstrated  through clinical  studies  and other  means  to be  safe and
effective.   Furthermore,  approval may  entail ongoing  requirements for  post-
marketing studies.  Even if regulatory approval is obtained, a marketed product,
its  manufacturer  and its  manufacturing  facilities are  subject  to continual
review and periodic inspections.  The regulatory standards for manufacturing are
currently being applied stringently by the FDA.  Discovery of previously unknown
problems with a product, manufacturer or facility may result in FDA restrictions
being placed on  such product or manufacturer or facility, including an order to
withdraw  a specific  product from  the  market, and  may also  result  in court
enforced sanctions against the product, manufacturer or facility.  

     The Company may  establish collaborative relationships to  conduct clinical
testing  and seek regulatory approvals  to market its  products in major markets
outside the U.S.  There can be no assurance that  the Company will be successful
in establishing such relationships or that such approvals will be received  in a
timely manner, if at  all.  To market its  products abroad, the Company is  also
subject to numerous and varying foreign regulatory requirements,  implemented by
foreign health authorities,  governing the design and conduct  of human clinical
trials, pricing  and marketing.   The approval procedure varies  among countries
and can involve additional testing, and the time required to obtain approval may
differ from that required to obtain FDA approval.  At present, foreign marketing
authorizations are applied for at a national level, although within the European
Union ("EU")  certain registration procedures are available to companies wishing
to  market  a product  in more  than one  EU  member country.   If  a regulatory
authority is  satisfied that adequate  evidence of safety, quality  and efficacy
has  been presented,  marketing authorization  is  almost always  granted.   The
foreign regulatory  approval process includes  all of the risks  associated with
obtaining  FDA approval set forth  above.  Approval  by the FDA  does not ensure
approval by other countries.

Lack of Sales and Marketing Capability

     The  Company has no  experience in  sales, marketing  or distribution.   To
market any of its products directly, the  Company must develop a marketing force
and sales  force  with  technical  expertise and  with  supporting  distribution
capability.    Alternatively,  the  Company  may  obtain  the  assistance  of  a
pharmaceutical company with  an established distribution system and sales force.
The Company recently announced that it has entered into an agreement with Bausch
& Lomb  to  market LotemaxTM  (See  "Recent Developments").    There can  be  no
assurance,  however,  that  the Company  will  be able  to  establish  sales and
distribution capabilities or be successful  in gaining market acceptance for its
products.

Lack of Manufacturing Capability

     The Company  currently has  limited manufacturing  capacity to produce  its
products for clinical trials.  The Company's recent agreement with Bausch & Lomb
addresses the 





                                        6
<PAGE>


manufacturing of LotemaxTM  (See "Recent Developments").   The proposed products
under development by the  Company have never been  manufactured on a  commercial
scale and there can be no assurances that such products can be manufactured at a
cost or in quantities necessary to make  them commercially viable.  Any delay in
availability of products may  result in delay in the submission  of products for
regulatory  approval or  the market  introduction and  subsequent sales  of such
products, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Need to Attract and Retain Key Employees and Consultants

     The Company is highly dependent on the principal members of its  scientific
and management  staff.   In  addition, the  Company  relies on  consultants  and
advisors  to assist  the Company  in  formulating its  research and  development
strategy.    Retaining  and  attracting  qualified  personnel,  consultants  and
advisors  will be critical  to the  Company's success.   In order to  pursue its
product development and  marketing plans, the  Company will be required  to hire
additional qualified scientific  personnel to perform research  and development,
as well as personnel with  expertise in clinical testing, government regulation,
manufacturing  and  marketing.   The  Company  faces competition  for  qualified
individuals   from   numerous   pharmaceutical   and  biotechnology   companies,
universities and  other research institutions.   There can be  no assurance that
the Company will  be able to attract  and retain such individuals  on acceptable
terms or at all.

     The  Company's  clinical  development is  conducted  under  agreements with
universities and medical institutions.   The Company depends on the availability
of a principal investigator for each such program, and the Company cannot assure
that these  individuals or their  research staffs will  be available to  conduct
clinical development.  The Company's academic collaborators are not employees of
the Company.  As a result, the Company has limited control over their activities
and  can expect  that only limited  amounts of  their time will  be dedicated to
Company activities.  The Company's academic collaborators may have relationships
with other commercial entities, some of which compete with the Company. 

Uncertainty of Health Care Reform Measures and Third-Party Reimbursement

     The   levels   of   revenues  and   profitability   of   biotechnology  and
pharmaceutical  companies  may  be   affected  by  the  continuing   efforts  of
governmental and  third-party payors to  contain or reduce  the costs of  health
care through various means.  For example, in certain foreign markets, pricing or
profitability  of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to government control.
In the U.S., there  have been, and the Company expects that  there will continue
to be,  a number of  federal and state proposals  to control health  care costs.
While  the Company  cannot predict  whether any  such legislative  or regulatory
proposals will be adopted or the effect such proposals may have on its business,
the uncertainty surrounding such proposals  could have a material adverse effect
on  the  Company.   Furthermore,  the  Company's  ability to  commercialize  its
potential  product portfolio may  be adversely affected to  the extent that such
proposals have  a material adverse  effect on the business,  financial condition
and  profitability of  other companies  that are  prospective  collaborators for
certain of the Company's proposed products.

                                        7



<PAGE>

Dependence on Reimbursement

     Pharmos' ability to  commercialize its products successfully may  depend in
part  on the  extent to which  reimbursement for  the cost of  such products and
related  treatments  will  be available  from  government  health administration
authorities,  private  health  insurers and  other  organizations.   Third-party
payors are increasingly challenging the  price of medical products and services.
Significant uncertainty exists as to  the reimbursement status of newly approved
health care  products, and there  can be no assurance  that adequate third-party
coverage will be available to enable Pharmos to maintain price levels sufficient
to realize an appropriate return on its investment in product development.  

Risk of Product Liability; Availability of Insurance

     The design, development and manufacture  of the Company's products  involve
an inherent risk  of product liability claims and  associated adverse publicity.
Although the  Company currently maintains general liability insurance, there can
be no  assurance that the  coverage limits  of the Company's  insurance policies
will be  adequate.   Similarly, the Company  currently maintains  clinical trial
liability insurance, but  there can be no  assurance that the coverage  limit of
the Company's insurance policies will be adequate.  The Company currently has no
product liability insurance, and there can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to obtain or maintain product liability insurance on acceptable terms or
with  adequate  coverage  against  potential  liabilities.   Such  insurance  is
expensive,  difficult  to obtain  and  may not  be  available in  the  future on
acceptable  terms or at all.  A  successful claim brought against the Company in
excess  of the Company's insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect
upon the Company and its financial condition.

Use of  Hazardous Materials;  Potential Liability to  Comply with  Environmental
Problems

     The Company's  research  and development  involves  the controlled  use  of
hazardous materials.   Although the Company believes that  its safety procedures
for handling  and disposing of  such materials  comply in all  material respects
with the  standard  prescribed by  state and  federal regulations,  the risk  of
accidental contamination or  injury from  these materials  cannot be  completely
eliminated.  In the event of such an accident, the  Company could be held liable
for any  damages that result, and any such  liability could exceed the resources
of  the  Company.   The  Company  may  incur substantial  costs  to  comply with
environmental regulations if the Company develops manufacturing capacity.  

Market for the  Company's Securities; Shares Eligible for  Future Sale; Possible
Volatility of Share Prices

     The market price of the Company's Common Stock, like that of other emerging
pharmaceutical companies,  has fluctuated significantly  in recent years  and is
likely to  fluctuate in  the future.   Announcements  by the  Company or  others
regarding   scientific  discoveries,   technological  innovations,   litigation,
products, patents or proprietary rights, the progress of

                                         8


<PAGE>

clinical trials, government regulation, public concern as to the safety of drugs
and  the reliability  of  the  Company's testing  processes  and general  market
conditions may  have a  significant impact  on the  market price  of the  Common
Stock.  The addition of the shares  being offered hereby and the shares issuable
upon exercise of the Company's currently outstanding warrants and options to the
number  of publicly-traded shares of  the Company's Common  Stock may affect the
volatility of share prices of the Company's Common Stock.

Outstanding Stock Options and Warrants

     As  of September  30, 1995,  the  Company had  outstanding incentive  stock
options to purchase an aggregate of 252,187 shares of Common Stock at an average
exercise price of $6.66 per share and non-qualified stock options to purchase an
aggregate  of 372,182 at an average exercise  price of $6.63 per share issued to
employees,  directors  and consultants  pursuant  to  stock  option plans    and
individual agreements with management and  directors of the Company and warrants
to purchase 3,367,674 shares  of the Company's Common Stock at  an average price
of  $2.31 per  share, excluding  the Warrants  to purchase an  additional 10,000
shares at an  exercise price of $1.88  per share issued to the  Company's Acting
Chief Financial Officer in connection with his  efforts on behalf of the Company
in the Private Placement Transaction.    

     The Company may issue additional  capital stock, warrants and/or options to
raise capital in the  future.  The Company  regularly examines opportunities  to
expand its  technology base  and product  line through  means such  as licenses,
joint  ventures and acquisition  of assets or  ongoing businesses  and may issue
securities in  connection with  such transactions.   However, no  commitments to
enter into or  pursue any such transaction  have been made  and there can be  no
assurance that any  such discussions will result  in any such  transaction being
concluded.  In order  to attract and retain key personnel,  the Company may also
issue additional  securities, including  stock options, in  connection with  its
employee benefit plans.   During  the terms  of such options  and warrants,  the
holders thereof are given  the opportunity to profit  from a rise in  the market
price of the Company's Common Stock.  The exercise of such options and  warrants
may  have an adverse effect  on the market value  of the Company's Common Stock.
Also, the existence  of such options and warrants may adversely affect the terms
on which the Company can obtain additional equity financing.  

Anti-Takeover Provisions

     The  Company is  subject  to  Sections 78.411-.444  of  the Nevada  General
Corporation  Law ("Nevada  Law"),  an anti-takeover  law,  which may  discourage
certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change in control
of the Company, including transactions in which the stockholders might otherwise
receive a premium  for their shares over  the current prices, and may  limit the
ability of the stockholders to approve a transaction that they may deem to be in
their best interests.   In addition,  the Board of  Directors has the  authority
without  action by  the stockholders to  fix the  rights and preferences  of and
issue  shares of  Preferred Stock,  which  may have  the effect  of  delaying or
preventing a change in control of the Company. 

                                        9
<PAGE>

Potential Future Acquisitions

     Due  to the  current  uncertainties  of the  capital  markets for  emerging
pharmaceutical  companies,  the  Company has  had  preliminary  discussions with
several  emerging pharmaceutical  and  biotechnology  companies about  potential
business and/or product consolidations, joint ventures, acquisitions, mergers or
other  business combinations (collectively  "acquisitions").   In the  event the
Company undertakes any such acquisitions it may  use some of its cash, including
part of the cash received in connection  with the Private Placement Transaction,
or  may issue  its  stock in  connection therewith.   Although  management would
attempt to structure  such acquisitions in a manner  that will minimize dilution
of  the equity  owned by current  stockholders, no  assurance can be  given that
acquisitions  will not result  in such dilution  or that control  of the Company
will not be changed as a result of  such acquisitions.  Such acquisitions may be
negotiated or may  be sought on an unsolicited basis and may involve speculative
and risky undertakings by the Company with increased risks to  its stockholders.
Under Nevada law, acquisitions do not require shareholders' approval except when
accomplished  by merger  or consolidation.   The  Company does not,  in general,
intend  to submit  acquisitions to  shareholder  vote except  where required  by
Nevada law.  The  Company has not entered into any  preliminary undertaking with
any  third parties  involving  any acquisitions  or  other business  combination
transactions. 

Special Considerations of Doing Business in Israel

     A significant part of the operations of  the Company is conducted in Israel
through its  wholly-owned subsidiary, Pharmos  Limited ("Pharmos Ltd."),  and is
directly  affected by  economic, political  and military  conditions there.   In
addition, Pharmos Ltd. has received certain funding from the Office of the Chief
Scientist of the  Israel Ministry of Industry and Trade  (the "Chief Scientist")
relating to its proprietary SubMicron Emulsion Technology and expects to file an
application  to receive  funding with  respect  to Dexanabinol,  a new  chemical
entity.   Such  funding prohibits the  transfer or  license of know-how  and the
manufacture of  resulting products outside  of Israel without the  permission of
the  Chief  Scientist.   Although  it is  the  Company's belief  that  the Chief
Scientist does not unreasonably withhold this permission if the request is based
upon commercially  justified circumstances  and any  royalty obligations  to the
Chief Scientist are  sufficiently assured, there  can be no assurance  that such
consent, if requested, would  be granted upon terms satisfactory  to the Company
or granted at all. 

Absence of Dividends

     No dividends  have been paid on the  Common Stock to date,  and the Company
does not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  





                                       10
<PAGE>
                                    DILUTION

     As  of September 30, 1995, the  net tangible book value  of the Company was
$6,887,165 or  $0.24 per share.  Net tangible book value per share is determined
by dividing the net  tangible book value  (tangible assets less liabilities)  of
the Company by the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at that date.  

     If all 900,000  of the Warrants exercisable  at an exercise price  of $1.80
per share are  exercised (each of  the Warrants purchasing  one share of  Common
Stock), there would  be 30,030,679 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a net
tangible book  value of $0.28 and the purchasers  of shares through the exercise
of such Warrants at a price  of $1.80 per share would suffer immediate  dilution
of $1.52 per share.  

     If all 10,000 of the Warrants exercisable at an exercise price of $0.78 per
share are exercised (each of the Warrants purchasing one share of Common Stock),
there would be 29,140,679 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a net tangible
book value of  $0.24 and the purchasers  of shares through the  exercise of such
Warrants at a price of $0.78 per share would suffer immediate dilution  of $0.54
per share.  

     If all 50,000 of the Warrants exercisable at an exercise price of $0.75 per
share are exercised (each of the Warrants purchasing one share of Common Stock),
there would be 29,180,679 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a net tangible
book value of  $0.24 and the purchasers  of shares through the exercise  of such
Warrants at a price of $0.75 per share  would suffer immediate dilution of $0.51
per share.  

     If all 50,000 of the Warrants exercisable at an exercise price of $1.00 per
share are exercised (each of the Warrants purchasing one share of Common Stock),
there would be 29,180,679 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a net tangible
book value of  $0.24 and the purchasers of  shares through the exercise  of such
Warrants at a price  of $1.00 per share would suffer immediate dilution of $0.76
per share.  

     If all 50,000 of the Warrants exercisable at an exercise price of $1.50 per
share are exercised (each of the Warrants purchasing one share of Common Stock),
there would be 29,180,679 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a net tangible
book value of $0.24  and the purchasers of  shares through the exercise  of such
Warrants at a price of $1.50 per share would suffer immediate dilution of  $1.26
per share.  

     If all 10,000 of the Warrants exercisable at an exercise price of $1.88 per
share are exercised (each of the Warrants purchasing one share of Common Stock),
there would be 29,140,679 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a net tangible
book value of $0.24  and the purchasers of  shares through the exercise of  such
Warrants at a price of $1.88 per share would  suffer immediate dilution of $1.64
per share.  


                                       11
<PAGE>

     If all of the  Warrants are exercised (each of the  Warrants purchasing one
share  of Common  Stock),  there  would be  30,200,679  shares  of Common  Stock
outstanding with a net  tangible book value of $0.29.   The purchasers of shares
through the exercise of such Warrants at a price of $1.80 per share would suffer
immediate  dilution of  $1.51 per  share; the purchasers  of shares  through the
exercise of such Warrants at  a price of $0.78 per share  would suffer immediate
dilution of $0.49  per share; the purchasers  of shares through the  exercise of
such Warrants  at a price of $0.75 per  share would suffer immediate dilution of
$0.46 per share; the purchasers of shares through the exercise of  such Warrants
at  a price  of $1.00  per share  would suffer immediate  dilution of  $0.71 per
share; the purchasers of shares through the exercise of such Warrants at a price
of $1.50  per share would suffer immediate dilution of  $1.21 per share; and the
purchasers  of shares through the exercise of  such Warrants at a price of $1.88
per share would suffer immediate dilution of $1.59 per share.       

                                 USE OF PROCEEDS
     The Company will receive  no proceeds from the  6,000,000 shares of  Common
Stock to be offered and resold by the Selling Stockholders.

     Assuming that all  of the 1,070,000 Warrants whose  underlying Common Stock
is  being offered hereby are exercised, the gross proceeds to be received by the
Company will be $1,809,100.  Such proceeds  will be added to working capital and
used  for general corporate purposes.  The amount  of proceeds to be received by
the Company, however, depends on the number of Warrants exercised.

     The Company  believes that its  current cash resources and  interest income
thereon, including  the funds obtained  from the Private  Placement Transaction,
combined with the  proceeds from the exercise  of the Warrants, assuming  all of
the 1,070,000 Warrants are  exercised (as to which there can  be no assurances),
should be sufficient to fund its operating expenses  and capital requirements as
currently planned through May 1997.  The amounts and timing of  expenditures for
each purpose  will  depend  on  the  progress  of  the  Company's  research  and
development programs,  technological advances,  determinations as  to commercial
potential,  the terms  of any  collaborative  arrangements entered  into by  the
Company for development  and licensing, regulatory approvals, and other factors,
many of which are beyond the Company's control.

     Pending  such  uses, the  cash  received  in  connection with  the  Private
Placement Transaction and the net proceeds from the exercise of the Warrants (if
exercised) will  be invested  in short-term,  interest-bearing investment  grade
securities.   Due  to the  current  uncertainties  of the  capital  markets  for
emerging pharmaceutical companies  the Company  has had preliminary  discussions
with several emerging pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies about potential
acquisitions.  Any such transaction might involve  the use of the Company's cash
resources as  consideration, including  part of the  proceeds of  this Offering.
The Company has  not entered into any  preliminary understanding with any  third
parties involving  any acquisitions  and is not  currently in  any negotiations.
See "Risk Factors -- Potential Acquisitions."

                                       12
<PAGE>



                            DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

Common Stock

     The Common Stock being offered hereby (i) by the Selling Stockholders, (ii)
by the Company upon the exercise  of the Warrants, and (iii) by any  "affiliate"
of the Company upon the resale of such Common Stock obtained from exercising the
Warrants is  fully described in the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A
dated January 30, 1984, filed pursuant to Section 12 of the  Securities Exchange
Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange Act").   See "Incorporation of  Certain
Documents by Reference".

     The  Company's Restated Articles  of Incorporation currently  authorize the
issuance of  up  to 50,000,000  shares of  Common Stock.    There are  currently
29,130,679 shares outstanding, or 33,132,722 shares taking into account exercise
of  all  outstanding stock  options  (and  stock options  which  the  Company is
contractually obligated to issue) and warrants (including the Warrants).   
Warrants

     The  900,000  Warrants  exercisable  at  an exercise  price  of  $1.80  are
exercisable commencing  September 14,  1996, and expire  on September  14, 2000.
The  10,000 Warrants exercisable  at an exercise price  of $0.78 are exercisable
from April 30, 1996 until April 30, 2005.  The 150,000 Warrants, 50,000 of which
are exercisable  at an exercise price of $0.75,  50,000 of which are exercisable
at  an exercise  price of  $1.00,  and 50,000  of  which are  exercisable at  an
exercise price of $1.50, are exercisable from May 1, 1996 until April  30, 2000.
The 10,000 Warrants  exercisable at an exercise  price of $1.88 are  exercisable
from October 31, 1996 until October 31, 2001.  All of the Warrants contain anti-
dilution provisions  providing for an  adjustment to  their respective  exercise
prices in the  event that the Company  effects a stock split  or stock dividend.
In  addition,  the number  and kind  of  shares of  Common Stock  underlying the
Warrants are subject to adjustments in  the event of any capital reorganization,
or  reclassification of the  capital stock of  the Company,  or consolidation or
merger  of  the  Company  with  another  corporation  or  entity  (other than  a
subsidiary of the  Company in which the  Company is the surviving  or continuing
corporation and no change occurs in the Company's Common Stock).

Other Securities--Preferred Stock

     The  Company's Restated Articles  of Incorporation currently  authorize the
issuance  of  up  to 1,250,000  shares  of  Preferred Stock,  none  of  which is
currently issued  and outstanding, and  empower the Board of  Directors, without
the  necessity  of further  action  or  authorization  by the  stockholders,  to
authorize  the issuance  of Preferred Stock  from time  to time  in one  or more
series and to fix the relative rights, preferences and limitations of  each such
series.  The issuance of Preferred Stock could adversely affect the voting power
of holders  of Common Stock  and the likelihood  that such holders  will receive
dividend payments  and payments upon  liquidation and  could have the  effect of
delaying, deferring  or preventing  a change  in control  of the  Company.   The
Company has no present plan to issue any shares of Preferred Stock.




                                       13

<PAGE>

Other Securities--Options and Class A and Class B Warrants

     As  of September  30, 1995,  the  Company had  outstanding incentive  stock
options to purchase an aggregate of 252,187 shares of Common Stock at an average
exercise price of $6.66 per share and non-qualified stock options to purchase an
aggregate of 372,182 at an  average exercise price of $6.63 per  share issued to
employees,  directors  and  consultants  pursuant  to  stock  option  plans  and
individual agreements with management and  directors of the Company and warrants
(excluding the  10,000 Warrants exercisable  at an  exercise price of  $1.88) to
purchase 3,367,674 shares of the Company's  Common Stock at an average price  of
$2.31 per share,  consisting of: 396,243  warrants which can be  exercised until
November 1998 each to purchase a single share of Common Stock for $3.06; 223,342
warrants which can  be exercised until November  1996 to each purchase  a single
share of Common Stock for $5.23; 36,393 Class A  warrants which can be exercised
until March 1998 to  purchase 36,393 shares of Common Stock for  $2.29 per share
and 41,083  Class B warrants,  which Class B warrants  expire in March  1999 and
allow the holder to purchase one share of Common Stock for  $2.84; unit purchase
options expiring in March 1998 which allow the holder to purchase 331,328 shares
of Common  Stock for $1.66 per share  and 200,146 Class A Warrants  which can be
exercised  to purchase 200,146  shares of Common  Stock for $3.61  per share and
225,940 Class B Warrants, which warrants can  be exercised to purchase one share
of  Common Stock per warrant for  $2.84 per share; 63,913  warrants which can be
exercised until  September 1999 each to purchase a  single share of Common Stock
for $2.30; 214,286  warrants which can be  exercised until October 1999  each to
purchase a single share of Common Stock for $0.84; 75,000 warrants which  can be
exercised until February  2000 each to purchase  a single share of  Common Stock
for $0.52; 500,000 warrants  which can be exercised from April  1996 until April
2005  to purchase one  share of  Common Stock per  warrant for  $2.75 per share;
10,000 Warrants  which can  be exercised  from April  1996 until  April 2005  to
purchase one  share of  Common Stock  per warrant  for $0.78  per share;  50,000
Warrants which can be exercised from  May 1996 until April 2000 to purchase  one
share of Common Stock per warrant for $.75  per share; 50,000 Warrants which can
be exercised from  May 1996  until April 2000  to purchase  one share of  Common
Stock per warrant  for $1.00 per share;  50,000 Warrants which can  be exercised
from May 1996 until April 2000 to purchase one share of Common Stock per warrant
for $1.50 per share; and 900,000 Warrants  which can be exercised from September
14, 1996  until September  14, 2000 to  purchase one share  of Common  Stock per
warrant for $1.80 per share.

Nevada Anti-Takeover Laws

     The Company is subject to the  provisions of Sections 78.411 through 78.444
of  the   Nevada  Law,  an  anti-takeover  statute  (the  "Business  Combination
Statute").  In  general, the Business Combination Statute  prohibits a publicly-
held Nevada  corporation from  engaging in a  "combination" with  an "interested
stockholder" for a period  of three years after the  date of the transaction  in
which the  person became an  interested stockholder, unless such  combination is
approved   in  a  prescribed  manner   and  continuing  thereafter  unless  such
combination  is approved in a prescribed  manner or satisfies certain fair value
requirements.     For  the   purposes  of  the   Business  Combination  Statute,
"combination" includes a merger, an asset sale,  the issuance or transfer by the
corporation of its shares in one transaction or a series of transactions, having
an aggregate fair market value  equal to five percent  or more of the  aggregate
market  value  of  the  corporation's  outstanding  shares,  to  the  interested
stockholder or to an associate of the interested 





                                       14

<PAGE>



stockholder, and  certain other types  of transactions resulting in  a financial
benefit the interested stockholder.  An "interested stockholder" is a person who
is the beneficial owner,  directly or indirectly, of ten percent or  more of the
corporation's voting stock or an affiliate  or associate of the corporation that
at any time  within the three years  immediately preceding the date  in question
was the beneficial  owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the
corporation's voting stock.

     By an amendment  to its By-laws, the  Company has exempted itself  from the
provisions of  Sections 78.378  through 78.3793  of the  Nevada Law,  a "control
share"  statute which  otherwise  prohibits an  acquiring person,  under certain
circumstances, from voting certain shares  of a target corporation's stock after
such  acquiring person's  percentage of  ownership of  such  corporation's stock
crosses  certain  thresholds,  unless  the  target  corporation's  disinterested
stockholders approve the granting of voting rights to such shares.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

     The transfer agent and registrar for the Company's Common Stock is American
Stock Transfer and Trust Company, New York, New York.

                              PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

     The Shares offered hereby by  the Selling Stockholders are 6,000,000 shares
of Common Stock  purchased by the Selling  Shareholders from the Company  in the
Private Placement Transaction.  This prospectus  also covers the issuance by the
Company  of up  to 1,070,000  shares of  Common Stock  upon the exercise  of the
Warrants, 900,000 of which were issued in connection with  the Private Placement
Transaction, 10,000 of  which were issued to a financial advisor to the Company,
150,000  of  which were  issued  to  the  Company's investment  banker\financial
consultant,  and  10,000 of  which were  issued  to the  Company's  Acting Chief
Financial Officer in recognition for his  efforts in connection with the Private
Placement Transaction.

     The sale  of all  or a  portion of  the Shares  and Warrant Shares  offered
hereby by  the Selling Stockholders  may be  effected from time  to time on  the
over-the-counter  market at  prevailing prices  at the  time of  such sales,  at
prices related to such prevailing prices  or at negotiated prices.  The  Selling
Stockholders may effect  such transactions by selling  to or though one  or more
broker-dealers, and such broker-dealers may  receive compensation in the form of
underwriting   discounts,   concessions   or   commissions   from  the   Selling
Stockholders.  The Selling Stockholders and any  broker-dealers that participate
in  the   distribution  may  under   certain  circumstances  be  deemed   to  be
"underwriters" within  the meaning  of the Securities  Act, and  any commissions
received by such broker-dealers and any profits realized on the resale of shares
by them may  be deemed to  be underwriting discounts  and commissions under  the
Securities Act.  The Company and the Selling Stockholders may agree to indemnify
such broker-dealers against certain liabilities, including,  without limitation,
certain  liabilities  under  the  Securities  Act,  or,  if  such  indemnity  is
unavailable, to contribute toward amounts required to be paid in respect of such
liabilities.

     To the extent required under  the Securities Act, a supplemental prospectus
will be  filed, disclosing  (a) the  name of  any such  broker-dealers, (b)  the
number of shares involved, (c) the 

                                       15

<PAGE>



price at which such shares are to be sold, (d) the commissions paid or discounts
or concessions allowed  to such broker-dealers, where applicable,  (e) that such
broker-dealers did not  conduct any investigation to verify  the information set
out or  incorporated by reference in  this prospectus, as supplemented,  and (f)
other facts material to the transaction.

     There is no assurance that any of the Selling Stockholders will sell any or
all of the shares of Common Stock hereby.
     The  Company  has agreed  to pay  certain  costs and  expenses  incurred in
connection with the  registration of the shares of Common  Stock offered hereby,
except  that the  Selling  Stockholders  shall be  responsible  for all  selling
commissions, transfer taxes and related charges in connection with the offer and
sale of such shares.

     The Company has  agreed to  keep the Registration  Statement of which  this
Prospectus forms  a part continuously  effective until  the earlier of  the date
that all  of such Shares  have been sold  or three years  from the date  of this
Prospectus. 

                            SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS
     The table below sets forth the name of each Selling Stockholder;  the total
amount of (i) shares of  Common Stock and (ii) shares of Warrant Shares issuable
upon the exercise  of the Warrants  beneficially owned by such  security holder;
the aggregate amount of Common Stock and/or Warrant Shares which may  be offered
for sale for  the account of  such security holder,  in his/her discretion  from
time to  time pursuant to this Prospectus; and the  amount of Common Stock which
would be beneficially owned by such security holder after sale of all securities
offered by  the Selling Stockholder  pursuant to  this Prospectus,  if they  are
offered and  sold, and  assuming that  any other  shares held  by such  security
holders are not  sold. None of the  Selling Stockholders referred to  herein has
held any position or office, or had  any material relationship, with the Company
or any of  its predecessors or affiliates within the last three years, except as
noted below, and none  of the Selling  Stockholders will own 1%  or more of  the
outstanding stock of  the Company after  completion of the  offering, except  as
noted below.

Because  the  initial issuance  by the  Company  of the  Warrant Shares  to non-
affiliated  holders is  covered  by  the Registration  Statement  of which  this
Prospectus forms  a part and  the resale thereof by  such non-affiliated holders
need  not  be registered  under the  Securities  Act, the  table below  does not
include the  non-affiliated holders  of the Warrants,  except for  the Company's
investment banker/financial consultant, Janssen-Meyers  Associates, L.P., who is
an  investor  in the  Private  Placement Transaction,  as  well as  a  holder of
Warrants.



                                       16

<PAGE>

<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                       Amount of        Shares of
                                                       Warrant Shares   Common Stock
                                      Shares of        Issuable upon    and/or Warrant
                                      Common Stock     Exercise of      Shares           Shares Owned
                Names                 Held(1)          Warrants Held    Offered(2)       After Sale

<S>                                        <C>              <C>               <C>             <C>
 Richard Stone                               231,371            7,500           100,000        131,371

 Michael G. Jesselson 4/8/71 Trust           120,833            9,063           120,833              0
 Jesselson 12/18/80 Trust FBO                120,833            9,062           120,833              0
 Grandchildren

 Esther Blech                                 83,333           31,250            83,333              0

 Edward Blech Family Trust                   333,334                0           333,334              0

 The Blech Family Trust                      250,000           18,750           250,000              0

 Stanley Shapiro                              68,610            5,000            66,667          1,943
 The Richard H. Davimos Trust                140,000            7,500           100,000         40,000
 UAD 5/12/92 FBO Richard Davimos

 David Russell                             1,000,000           75,000         1,000,000              0

 Robert E. Hernreich                          50,000            3,750            50,000              0

 Steven Oliveira                              25,000            1,875            25,000              0
 Janssen-Meyers Associates, L.P.             175,000          403,125           175,000              0

 J. M. Hull Associates, L.P.                 250,000           18,750           250,000              0

 Argonaut Partnership, L.P.                  175,000           13,125           175,000              0

 Argonaut Investment Fund Ltd.               325,000           24,375           325,000              0

 Stephen J. Buell                             25,000            1,875            25,000              0
 Apollo Capital Management Group,            100,000            7,500           100,000              0
 L.P.

 Fred Applegate                              100,000            7,500           100,000              0

 Bulldog Capital Partners, L.P.              178,000           11,250           150,000         28,000

 Contrarian Opportunities Fund,               25,000            1,875            25,000              0
 L.P.

 Everglades Partners, L.P.                    75,000            5,625            75,000              0

 The Fairmont Fund                           250,000           18,750           250,000              0

 Richard A. Gibbs, II                        185,000            9,375           125,000         60,000

 Richard A. Hansen                           100,000            7,500           100,000              0
 Philip J. Hempleman                          80,000            6,000            80,000              0

 Infinity Fund, L.P.                         165,400            7,500           100,000         65,400



                                       17
<PAGE>

<CAPTION> 

                                                       Amount of        Shares of
                                                       Warrant Shares   Common Stock
                                      Shares of        Issuable upon    and/or Warrant
                                      Common Stock     Exercise of      Shares           Shares Owned
                Names                 Held(1)          Warrants Held    Offered(2)       After Sale

<S>                                        <C>              <C>               <C>             <C>

 Little Wing, L.P.                           100,000            7,500           100,000              0

 Pamela L. Miles Trust DTD 4/26/91           100,000            7,500           100,000              0

 Harry Mittelman                             130,000            7,500           100,000         30,000
 Peqout Scout Fund, L.P.                     350,000           26,250           350,000              0

 Porter Partners, L.P.                       400,000           30,000           400,000              0

 Sanford Prater                               20,000            1,500            20,000              0

 Peter Rawlings                               70,000            5,250            70,000              0

 Morton H. Sachs, IRA                         50,000            3,750            50,000              0
 The Sachs Company                           100,000            7,500           100,000              0

 Seedling Fund, L.P.                          25,000            1,875            25,000              0

 Steven Silver                               100,000            7,500           100,000              0

 Sonz Partners, L.P.                         100,000            7,500           100,000              0

 John P. Weeks                               130,000            9,750           130,000              0
 Dr. Lance W. Willsey                         50,000            3,750            50,000              0

 S. Colin Neill                                5,000           10,000         10,000(3)          5,000
____________________
</TABLE>


                (1)     Does not include Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
Warrants held by Selling Stockholders.

                (2)     Does not include the Warrant  Shares because the initial
issuance  by the Company of the Warrant  Shares to non-affiliated holders is 
covered by the Registration Statement  of which this Prospectus forms  a part
and the resale  thereof by such non-affiliated holders need  not be 
registered under the Securities Act.

                (3)     Includes Mr. Neill's  Warrant Shares since Mr. Neill is
currently an affiliate of the Company, and, therefore,  the Registration of
which this Prospectus forms a part covers the issuance of his Warrant Shares by
the  Company upon the exercise of his Warrants and his resale of his
Warrant Shares.



                                       18

<PAGE>

                               RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

   
LotemaxTM NDA Status Update

     On December  19, 1995, the Company announced that  the Company and Bausch &
Lomb  had  recently met  with the  FDA  to discuss  the  status of  the clinical
segments of  the NDA  filed for  LotemaxTM.  Discussions  included the  clinical
importance of  uveitis, a severe form of eye  inflammation, to fully support the
broad class labeling claims  sought in the NDA.  As a result of the discussions,
Pharmos and Bausch & Lomb have opted to accelerate a previously planned Phase IV
uveitis clinical trial to provide the FDA  with additional data.  The study will
begin early in 1996 and  is planned to be completed by the middle of 1996.  This
will result in a product launch delay until late 1996.

     The  Company also  announced the  commencement  of two  clinical trials  on
LotemaxTM line extension  to treat eye allergies.  These studies use a different
dosage and a  different formulation from the 0.5%  Loteprednol etabonate used in
LotemaxTM, and will be designed to treat mild allergies of the eye, an important
segment of the opthalmic market.   The studies are scheduled to  be completed in
the middle of 1996 and the Company is planning to submit an NDA by late 1996.
    
 
Bodor Dispute

     On October 27, 1995, the Company commenced  an action in Supreme Court, New
York County (the  "State Court"), against Dr. Nicholas Bodor,  a former director
of  the Company, seeking to enjoin Dr.  Bodor from taking any steps to terminate
or interfere  with the Company's  rights under  its License  Agreement with  Dr.
Bodor relating to  LotemaxTM.  Dr. Bodor claims that the advances against future
revenues  of LotemaxTM  recently received  by  the Company  under its  Marketing
Agreement with Bausch & Lomb are an up front licensing fee of which Dr. Bodor is
entitled to  receive a  portion and  that the  failure to  pay would  constitute
grounds for  his terminating the License Agreement.   Dr. Bodor also claims that
the  Marketing  Agreement  is  actually  a sublicense  entitling  Dr.  Bodor  to
additional royalties under his License Agreement and in response has commenced a
separate action seeking  judicial clarification of these issues.  In such event,
Dr. Bodor  would be entitled to receive a portion of the Company's advances from
Bausch & Lomb as  well as a higher royalty percentage from the Company on future
sales of LotemaxTM.

      The Company  strongly disagrees with  Dr. Bodor's characterization  of the
Bausch & Lomb  Marketing Agreement and believes his  interpretation is incorrect
and has no merit.  To prevent  Dr. Bodor from wrongfully terminating the License
Agreement, the Company commenced the action to protect its rights under both the
License Agreement and the Marketing Agreement.


                                       19

<PAGE>




Amended Complaint in Blech Class Action

   
     In  September 1994,  a  class action  was commenced  in  the United  States
District  Court  for the  Southern  District  of New  York  against  David Blech
("Blech"), D.  Blech & Co. ("Blech & Co."), Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. and certain
other Defendants alleging  that Defendants conspired  to manipulate and  inflate
the prices  of the  securities  of a  number  of publicly  traded  biotechnology
companies in which  Blech and Blech &  Co. allegedly had a  controlling interest
for an alleged class period from July 1, 1991 through September 21, 1994.

     On March 28, 1995, an Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, entitled
In  re Blech  Securities Litigation,  94  Civ. 7696  (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.)  ("Amended
- -----------------------------------
Complaint") was filed,  in which action the  Company was named as  an additional
co-Defendant.   The Amended Complaint  names as  Defendants Blech, Blech  & Co.,
Bear  Stearns  & Co.,  Inc.  and  numerous  other Defendants,  including  eleven
publicly  traded biotechnology  companies,  one of  which is  the Company.   The
Amended Complaint asserts the same basic claims as the original complaint.   The
Amended Complaint seeks certification as a class action and requests unspecified
damages against Defendants in connection with the alleged  unlawful manipulation
of the stock market prices of twenty-four different biotechnology companies.

     The Company believes  that the claims against  it have no factual  or legal
basis, and  filed in June 1995  a motion to dismiss the  claims asserted against
it.  In  the Company's motion  to dismiss, the  Company maintained, inter  alia,
                                                                    -----  ----
that the  Amended Complaint did not  contain any specific or  legally cognizable
allegations of fraudulent conduct on the part of the Company, and that the named
Plaintiffs (none of whom are alleged  to have purchased or sold common  stock of
the Company) lacked standing to assert any claims against the Company.

     The Company's motion to  dismiss (along with motions to dismiss by numerous
other Defendants) was  argued and submitted before United  States District Court
Judge Robert W. Sweet, the Federal Judge assigned  the case on November 9, 1995.
The Federal Judge  took the motions under  submission at the conclusion  of oral
argument on November  9, 1995, and a  decision has not yet been  rendered by the
Court.
    

Marketing Agreement with Bausch & Lomb 

     On July 5,  1995, the  Company announced  that it has  signed a  definitive
agreement with Bausch & Lomb to  manufacture and market LotemaxTM in the  United
States.  Also  covered by the  agreement with Bausch  & Lomb are  LotemaxTM line
extension  products  currently  being  developed  by the  Company.    Under  the
agreement, Bausch  &  Lomb will  purchase  the active  drug substance  from  the
Company  for a cost of 29.4% of the  drug selling price.  The agreement provides
for cash advances relating to  future sales by the Company aggregating  up to $4
million.   The Company  received an  initial $1  million upon  signing and  will
receive another  $3 million by March 1996.   An additional $2 million is subject
to  reaching  certain development  milestones  in the  LotemaxTM  line extension
products.   Bausch  & Lomb  will also  collaborate in  the  development of  such
additional products by making available amounts up  to $3 million to fund 50% of
their  Phase  III  clinical  trial   costs.  The  Company  will  retain  certain
conditional co-marketing rights to  all of the products covered by the marketing
agreement.


                                       20

<PAGE>


                 INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE

     The  following documents  filed  by  the Company  with  the Commission  are
incorporated  herein by reference:

     (a)  The  Company's Annual Report  on Form 10-K, for  the fiscal year ended
December  31, 1994,  filed pursuant  to Section  13  of the  Exchange Act.   The
consolidated financial  statements included  in the  Company's Annual Report  on
Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with  the disclosures in Forms 8-K and a
related amendment filed subsequent to December 31, 1994.

     (b)  The Company's Quarterly Reports on  Form 10-Q, for the quarters ending
March 31, June 30 (as amended) and September 30, 1995, filed pursuant to Section
13 of the Exchange Act.

     (c)   The Company's  Current Report on  Form 8-K,  dated October  27, 1995,
filed pursuant  to Section 13 of the  Exchange Act.  As described  on page 17 of
this Prospectus  under the caption "Bodor Dispute,"  such Form 8-K reported that
the Company  has  commenced  an action  against  Dr. Nicholas  Bodor,  a  former
director of the Company,  seeking to enjoin Dr.  Bodor from taking any steps  to
terminate or  interfere with  the Company's rights  under its  License Agreement
with Dr. Bodor relating to LotemaxTM.

     (d)  The  Company's Current Report on  Form 8-K, dated September  14, 1995,
filed  pursuant to  Section  13 of  the  Exchange  Act, describing  the  Private
Placement Transaction.

     (e)   The Company's Current  Report on Form 8-K,  dated July 5, 1995, filed
pursuant  to  Section 13  of  the Exchange  Act,  describing the  Bausch  & Lomb
Marketing and Manufacturing Agreement.

     (f)   The Company's  Current Report on  Form 8-K, dated  April 26, 1995, as
amended,  filed pursuant  to Section  13  of the  Exchange  Act, describing  the
Company's acquisition of Oculon Corporation.

     (g)  The Company's Current Report on  Form 8-K, dated April 10, 1995, filed
pursuant to  Section 13 of the  Exchange Act.  As  described on page 17  of this
Prospectus under  the caption  "Amended Complaint in  Blech Class  Action," such
Form 8-K reported  that the Company has been named as an additional co-defendant
in an  amended complaint  filed in  a pending  class action  suit against  David
Blech,  D.  Blech &  Co.  and a  number  of other  defendants,  including eleven
publicly traded biotechnology companies.

     (h)    The description  of  the  Common Stock  contained  in the  Company's
Registration Statement  on Form 8-A  dated January  30, 1984, filed  pursuant to
Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

     In addition,  all reports and  other documents to  be filed by  the Company
pursuant to Sections  13(a), 13(c), 14 and  15(d) of the Exchange  Act, prior to
the filing  of a  post-effective amendment which  indicates that  all securities
offered hereby have been sold or which deregisters all securities offered hereby
then remaining unsold, as well as all such reports filed after the date 


                                       21

<PAGE>



hereof  and prior to  the termination of  this offering,  shall be deemed  to be
incorporated by reference herein and  shall be deemed to  be a part hereof  from
the date of the filing of each such report or document.

                     COMMISSION'S POLICY ON INDEMNIFICATION
                         FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

     Article 12 of the Company's  Restated Articles of Incorporation directs the
Company to provide  in its bylaws for provisions relating to the indemnification
of directors  and officers to  the full extent  permitted by law,  including the
federal  securities  law.   Section 78.751  of the  Nevada Revised  Statutes, as
amended,  authorizes the  Company to  indemnify  any director  or officer  under
certain  prescribed  circumstances and  subject  to certain  limitations against
certain costs  and expenses, including  attorneys' fees actually  and reasonably
incurred  in connection  with any  action,  suit or  proceeding, whether  civil,
criminal, administrative  or investigative, to which  such person is a  party by
reason of  being a director or officer  of the Company if it  is determined that
such  person acted  in accordance with  the applicable  standard of  conduct set
forth in such  statutory provisions.  The Company may also purchase and maintain
insurance for the benefit of any director or officer which may cover  claims for
which the Company could not indemnify such person.

          Insofar as indemnification  for liabilities arising under  the Act may
be permitted to directors, officers, and controlling persons of the Company,  or
to underwriters (or  controlling persons thereof) of which  an officer, partner,
or controlling person thereof is one of the foregoing pursuant to  the foregoing
provisions or otherwise, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Act  and is, therefore, unenforceable.  In the  event that a
claim for  indemnification against such  liabilities (other than the  payment by
the Company  of expenses incurred or paid by any such persons, in the successful
defense of any  action, suit or proceeding)  is asserted by any  such persons in
connection with the securities being registered, the Company will, unless in the
opinion of  its counsel the  matter has been  settled by  controlling precedent,
submit  to a  court of  appropriate  jurisdiction the  question of  whether such
indemnification  by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will
be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

                                 LEGAL OPINIONS
     Legal matters in  connection with the securities being  offered hereby will
be  passed upon  for the Company  by Fitzpatrick  Eilenberg & Zivian,  666 Third
Avenue, New York, New York  10017.

                                     EXPERTS

     The financial  statements incorporated in  this Prospectus by  reference to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for  the year ended December 31, 1994, have  been
so  incorporated in reliance on the report  of Price Waterhouse LLP, independent
accountants,  given on  the authority of  said firm  as experts in  auditing and
accounting.




                                       22

<PAGE>



                               PHARMOS CORPORATION
                               -------------------

                                __________, 1995



                                      INDEX
                                      -----



                                                                        Page No.


THE COMPANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    1

RISK FACTORS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    1

DILUTION  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   11

USE OF PROCEEDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   12

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   13

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   15

SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   16

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   19

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   21

COMMISSION'S POLICY ON INDEMNIFICATION
FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   22

LEGAL OPINIONS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   22

EXPERTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   22



<PAGE>




                                     PART II

                     INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 14.  Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
          -------------------------------------------
     The following  statement sets forth the estimated expenses(1) in connection
with the offering  described in the Registration Statement,  assuming all of the
Warrants are exercised at their respective exercise  price (all of which will be
borne by the Registrant).

Securities and Exchange Commission Fee  . .   $3,807
Printing and Engraving Expenses . . . . . . . .  100
Accountants' Fees and Expenses  . . . . . . .  1,000
Legal Fees and Expenses . . . . . . . . . .   15,000
Blue Sky Filing Fees  . . . . . . . . . . .   10,000
Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  193

TOTAL                                        $30,100


Item 15.  Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
          ------------------------------------------

     Article 12  of the Registrant's  Certificate of  Incorporation directs  the
Registrant  to   provide  in   its  bylaws  for   provisions  relating   to  the
indemnification of directors and officers  to the full extent permitted  by law.
Section  78.751 of  the  Nevada  Revised Statutes,  as  amended, authorizes  the
Registrant  to  indemnify  any  director  or  officer under  certain  prescribed
circumstances  and  subject to  certain  limitations against  certain  costs and
expenses,   including  attorneys'  fees  actually  and  reasonably  incurred  in
connection with any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, admini-
strative or investigative, to which such person is a party by reason  of being a
director or officer of the Registrant if it is determined that such person acted
in  accordance  with  the applicable  standard  of  conduct  set  forth in  such
statutory provisions.

     The Registrant  may also purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of
any director or  officer which may cover  claims for which the  Registrant could
not indemnify such person.

Item 16.  Exhibits 
          ---------
          4(a)      Specimen  of  Common  Stock   Certificate  (incorporated  by
                    reference to Form S-3 Registration  Statement of the Company
                    dated November 25, 1994 [No. 33-86720]) 

          4(b)      Restated   Articles   of  Incorporation   (incorporated   by
                    reference  to  Appendix  E  to  the Joint  Proxy  Statement/
                    Prospectus included in  the Form S-4 Registration  Statement
                    of the Registrant dated September 28, 1992 [No. 33-52398])




                                      II-1
<PAGE>




          4(c)      Certificate   of   Amendment   of   Restated   Articles   of
                    Incorporation (incorporated  by reference  to the  Company's
                    Annual Report on  Form 10-K for the year  ended December 31,
                    1994 [No. 0-11550]) 

          4(d)      Amended and  Restated By-Laws (incorporated  by reference to
                    Form  S-1 Registration Statement  of the Company  dated June
                    30, 1994 [No. 33-80916])

          4(e)      Form of Unit  Purchase Agreement dated  as of September  14,
                    1995  between the Company and the Investors (incorporated by
                    reference to the Company's Current  Report on Form 8-K dated
                    September 14, 1995 [No. 0-11550]) 

          4(f)      Form of  Warrant Agreement  dated as of  September 14,  1995
                    between  the  Company  and  the Investors  (incorporated  by
                    reference to the Company's Current  Report on Form 8-K dated
                    September 14, 1995 [No. 0-11550]) 

          *4(g)     Form of  Warrant Agreement dated  as of April  30, 1995
                    between the Company and Charles Stolper 

          *4(h)     Form of  Warrant Agreement dated  as of April  30, 1995
                    between the Company and Janssen/Meyers Associates, L.P.


          *4(i)     Form of Warrant Agreement dated as of  October 31, 1995
                    between the Company and S. Colin Neill 

          *5        Opinion re: legality

          23(a)     Consent of Fitzpatrick Eilenberg & Zivian  (included in
                    the Opinion filed as Exhibit 5)

          **23(b)   Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP

_______________

   
*    Filed with original S-3 Registration Statement filed on November 14, 1995.

**   Filed herewith.
    

Item 17.  Undertakings.
          ------------
     The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes;

     (1)  To file, during any period in which  offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this registration statement:





                                      II-2
<PAGE>




          (i)  To  include any  prospectus required by  section 10(a)(3)  of the
Securities Act of 1933;

          (ii) To reflect  in the prospectus  any facts or events  arising after
the  effective date  of the  registration statement  (or the  most recent  post-
effective  amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent
a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement;

          (iii) To include  any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution  not  previously disclosed  in  the registration  statement  or any
material change to such information in the registration statement.

     Provided, however, that Paragraphs  (i) and (ii) above do not  apply if the
     --------  -------
Registration  Statement is  on  Form  S-3 and  the  information required  to  be
included  in a  post-effective amendment  by  those paragraphs  is contained  in
periodic reports filed by the registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in the
Registration Statement.

     (2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933,  each such post-effective  amendment shall  be deemed to  be a  new
registration  statement  relating to  the  securities offered  therein,  and the
offering of such securities at that time shall  be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.  

     (3) To remove from  registration by means of a post-effective amendment any
of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering.

     (4) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, each  filing of the registrant's annual report  pursuant to Section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 (and,  where applicable,
each filing of  an employee  benefit plan's  annual report  pursuant to  Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934) that is incorporated by reference
in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to  the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

     Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be  permitted to directors, officers and controlling  persons of the
Registrant pursuant  to the foregoing  provisions, or otherwise,  the Registrant
has been  advised that in the opinion of  the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is  against public policy as  expressed in the Act  and is,
therefore unenforceable.  In the event that  a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant  of expenses incurred
or  paid by a director, officer, or controlling  person of the Registrant in the
successful defense  of any  action,  suit or  proceeding)  is asserted  by  such
director, officer or controlling person  in connection with the securities being
registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has  been settled by  controlling precedent,  submit to  a court  of appropriate
jurisdiction the question  whether such indemnification by it  is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.

                                      II-3
<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES
                                   ----------


   
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of  1933, the registrant
certifies that it  has reasonable grounds  to believe that it  meets all of  the
requirements for  filing on  Form  S-3 and  has  duly caused  this  registration
statement to  be  signed  on  its  behalf by  the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized,  in the  City of Alachua  and State  of Florida  on the 29th  day of
December, 1995.
    

                              PHARMOS CORPORATION


                              By:/s/       HAIM AVIV               
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Dr. Haim Aviv, Chairman, Chief
                                 Scientist, Chief Executive Officer
                                 and Director (Principal Executive
                                 Officer)

Pursuant  to the requirements  of the Securities Act  of 1933, this registration
statement or  amendment has been  signed below by  the following persons  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature                          Title                    Date
- ---------                      ---------                    ----
   

/s/ S. COLIN NEILL            Acting Chief             December 29, 1995
- ------------------
S. Colin Neill                Financial Officer
                              (Principal Financial and
                              Accounting Officer)



/s/ MARVIN P. LOEB            Director                 December 29, 1995
- ----------------------
Marvin P. Loeb


/s/ E. ANDREWS GRINSTEAD III  Director                 December 29, 1995
- ----------------------------
E. Andrews Grinstead III


/s/ STEPHEN C. KNIGHT         Director                 December 29, 1995
- ---------------------
Stephen C. Knight

/s/ DAVID SCHLACHET           Director                 December 29, 1995
- --------------------
David Schlachet

/s/ WILLIAM C. HULLEY         Director                 December 29, 1995
- ---------------------
William C. Hulley

    





                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(b)



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Pharmos Corporation

We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated
March 17, 1995 appearing in Pharmos Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994.  We also consent to the  reference to us under
the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.


   
/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
- ------------------------

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
New York, New York
December 29, 1995
    





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission