<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
-----------------------
FORM 10-KSB
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-15982
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
CALIFORNIA
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
1840 CENTURY PARK EAST
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
(Address to principal executive offices)
95-3819685
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
90067
(Zip Code)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (310) 277-2265
NO SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE
SERIES A NONCUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK
(TITLE OF CLASS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. /X/ Yes / / No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the registrant`s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB. / /
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of its
Common Stock as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers
Automated Quotation System on March 15, 1999, was approximately $2,682,734.
The number of shares of Common Stock, no par value, of the registrant
outstanding as of March 15, 1999 was 677,048.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
<PAGE>
Certain portions of the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the
Commission pursuant to Rule 14a-6 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in
connection with the Company's 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are
incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10-13 of this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB.
THIS REPORT INCLUDES A TOTAL OF 71 PAGES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS ON PAGE 70
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE(S) IN
FORM
10-KSB
----------
<S> <C>
PART I
Item 1. Business.........................................................................................1
Item 2. Properties.......................................................................................6
Item 3. Legal Proceedings................................................................................7
Item 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders..............................................7
PART II
Item 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity And Related Shareholder Matters...........................7
Item 6. Selected Financial Data..........................................................................8
Item 7. Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations...........10
Item 8. Financial Statements And Supplementary Data.....................................................43
Item 9. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure............43
PART III
Item 10. Directors And Executive Officers Of The Registrant..............................................43
Item 11. Executive Compensation..........................................................................43
Item 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management..................................43
Item 13. Certain Relationships And Related Transactions..................................................43
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, And Reports On Form 8-K................................44
Signatures ................................................................................................44
Financial Statements.........................................................................................46
Exhibit Index................................................................................................70
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-KSB may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act") and as such may involve risks and uncertainties. These
forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the
business environment in which the Company operates, projections of future
performance, perceived opportunities in the market and statements regarding the
Company's mission and vision. The Company's actual results, performance, or
achievements may differ significantly from the results, performance, or
achievements expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. For
discussion of the factors that might cause such a difference, see "Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Factors Which May Affect Future Operating Results".
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
National Mercantile Bancorp (the "Company") is a corporation which was
organized under the laws of the State of California in 1983 and is registered as
a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
(the "BHC Act"). The Company's principal asset is the capital stock of
Mercantile National Bank (the "Bank"), its wholly owned subsidiary. The
Company's principal business is to serve as a holding company for the Bank, and
for other banking or banking-related subsidiaries which the Company may
establish or acquire. Because the Bank comprises substantially all of the
business of the Company, references in this form 10-KSB to the "Company" reflect
the consolidated activities of the Company and Bank. The Company has been
authorized by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the "Reserve Bank") to
engage in lending activities separate from the Bank but to date has not done so.
The Bank was organized in 1981 as a national banking association and
obtained a Certificate of Authority to commence the business of banking from the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC") in 1982. The Bank's
primary business activities are to generate loans and deposits. The Bank
provides revolving lines of credit, term loans, equipment loans, asset-based
loans, commercial real estate secured loans and deposits, investment and other
business services. The Company's business strategy is to build upon providing
traditional banking services to the niche markets represented by professional,
business and entertainment borrowers, and associated individuals with commercial
banking and personal banking needs from its single location in Century City,
California.
The Company continues to expand upon and develop products and services
specifically tailored for each of its market niches. The Company has hired
relationship managers who are knowledgeable about the specified needs and
product requirements of these markets. The Company delivers these products and
services through a team approach, combining an experienced relationship
management officer with an operations support professional to ensure smooth
transition from establishment of the account relationships to ongoing account
maintenance and service. The Company believes that this team approach enables it
to provide a consistently higher level of service to its clients and
differentiates the Company from its competitors and, particularly, from the
large banks.
The Company primarily focuses on small-sized to medium-sized companies in
its primary service area (an eighteen mile radius from its office in Century
City), with specific emphasis on professional and entertainment firms,
executives, business managers and high net worth individuals and other large
deposit clients. The Company believes recent merger activity in the banking
arena has created opportunities for the Bank to continue to compete for the
business of companies and individuals in the Bank's existing markets.
During 1998, the Company completed the process of increasing the size of
its Board of Directors by adding directors that have significant contacts in the
market niches the Company serves. These new directors are Don Benson, Executive
Vice President of Marquette Bancshares, Inc; Joe Cohen, President and Founder of
American Entertainment Investors, Inc.; Antoinette Hubenette, M.D., President of
Cedars-Sinai Medical Group; Retired Superior Court Judge Dion Morrow; and Carl
Terzian, Chairman of Carl Terzian Associates. The Company believes that the
combination of local decision making bankers who know and understand the
client's business, and a Board of Directors whose members are actively involved
in the community may generate a substantial number of referrals.
Page 1
<PAGE>
In order to grow and expand its array of products and services, the Company
may from time to time acquire other financial service-related companies
including "in-market' acquisitions with banks of similar size and market
presence. The Company has hired a seasoned management team and plan to build on
the strengths of that team and the Company's enhanced capital structure. The
Company has no current arrangements, understandings or agreements regarding any
such acquisition. No assurance can be made that the Company will identify an
acquisition which can be completed on terms and conditions acceptable to the
Company or that the Company could obtain the necessary regulatory approvals.
COMPETITION
The banking business is highly competitive. The Bank's primary service area
is dominated by a relatively small number of major banks which have many offices
operating over a wide geographical area. The Bank competes for loans and
deposits primarily with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations,
credit unions, and thrift and loan companies, as well as with non-depository
institutions, including mortgage companies, commercial finance lenders and
providers of money market mutual funds. Non-depository institutions can be
expected to increase the extent to which they act as financial intermediaries.
Large institutional users and sources of credit may also increase the extent to
which they interact directly, meeting business credit needs outside the banking
system. Furthermore, the geographic constraints on portions of the financial
services industry can be expected to erode. In addition, many of the major
commercial banks operating in the Bank's primary service area offer services,
such as trust services, which are not offered directly by the Bank and, by
virtue of their greater total capitalization, such banks have substantially
higher lending limits than the Bank.
To compete with other financial institutions in its primary service area,
the Bank relies principally upon personal contact by its officers, directors and
employees and providing, through third parties, specialized services such as
messenger services and escrow accounting services. For clients whose loan
demands exceed the Bank's legal lending limit, the Bank will arrange for such
loans on a participation basis with other banks. The Bank also assists clients
requiring other services not offered by the Bank in obtaining such services from
other providers.
MONETARY POLICY
The net income of the Bank is affected not only by general economic
conditions, but also by the policies of various governmental regulatory
authorities in the U.S. and abroad. In particular, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve Board") exerts a substantial influence
on interest rates and credit conditions, primarily through open market
operations in United States government securities, varying the discount rate on
member bank borrowings and setting reserve requirements against deposits.
Federal Reserve Board's monetary policies have had a significant effect on the
operating results of financial institutions in the past and are expected to
continue to do so in the future.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
Bank holding companies, banks and their non-bank affiliates are extensively
regulated under both federal and state law. The following is not intended to be
an exhaustive description of the statutes and regulations applicable to the
Company's or the Bank's business. The description of statutory and regulatory
provisions is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory
or regulatory provisions.
Moreover, new legislation and other regulatory changes affecting bank
holding companies, banks and the financial services industry in general have
occurred in the last several years and can be expected to occur in the future.
The nature, timing and impact of new and amended laws and regulations cannot be
accurately predicted.
BANK HOLDING COMPANIES
Bank holding companies are regulated under the BHC Act and are supervised
by the Federal Reserve Board. Under the BHC Act, the Company files reports of
its operations and other information with the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal
Reserve Board may conduct examinations of the Company and the Bank.
Page 2
<PAGE>
The BHC Act requires, among other things, the Federal Reserve Board's prior
approval whenever a bank holding company proposes to (i) acquire all or
substantially all the assets of a bank, (ii) acquire direct or indirect
ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of a bank, (iii) merge
or consolidate with another bank holding company, (iv) with certain exceptions,
from acquiring more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a
bank and (v) from engaging in any activities without the Federal Reserve Board's
prior approval other than (1) managing or controlling banks and other
subsidiaries authorized by the BHC Act, or (2) furnishing services to, or
performing services for, its subsidiaries. The BHC Act authorizes the Federal
Reserve Board to approve the ownership of shares in any company, the activities
of which have been determined to be so closely related to banking or to managing
or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.
Consistent with its "source of strength" policy (see "Capital Adequacy
Requirements," below), the Federal Reserve Board has stated that, as a matter of
prudent banking, a bank holding company generally should not pay cash dividends
unless its net income available to common shareholders has been sufficient to
fully fund the dividends, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears
consistent with the company's capital needs, asset quality and overall financial
condition.
Under the BHC Act and regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve Board, a
bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in
certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or
sale of property or financing of services.
The Federal Reserve Board may, among other things, issue cease-and-desist
orders with respect to activities of bank holding companies and nonbanking
subsidiaries that represent unsafe or unsound practices or violate a law,
administrative order or written agreement with a federal banking regulator. The
Federal Reserve Board can also assess civil money penalties against companies or
individuals who violate the BHC Act or other federal laws or regulations, order
termination of nonbanking activities by nonbanking subsidiaries of bank holding
companies and order termination of ownership and control of a nonbanking
subsidiary by a bank holding company.
NATIONAL BANKS
OCC. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to supervision and examination
by the OCC and requirements and restrictions under federal and state law,
including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on
the types and amounts of loans that may be granted and limitations on the types
of investments that may be made and services that may be offered. Various
consumer laws and regulations also affect the Bank's operations. These laws
primarily protect depositors and other customers of the Bank, rather than the
Company and its shareholders.
The Company's principal asset is its investment in the Bank. The Bank's
ability to pay dividends to the Company is limited by certain statutes and
regulations. OCC approval is required for a national bank to pay a dividend if
the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year exceeds the total of
the bank's net profits (as defined) for that year combined with its retained net
profits for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfer to
surplus or a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. A national bank may
not pay any dividend that exceeds its retained net profits then on hand after
deducting its loan losses and bad debts, as defined by the OCC. At December 31,
1998 the Bank did not have funds available for the payment of cash dividends.
The OCC and the Federal Reserve Board have also issued banking circulars
emphasizing that the level of cash dividends should bear a direct correlation to
the level of a national bank's current and expected earnings stream, the bank's
need to maintain an adequate capital base and other factors. National banks that
are not in compliance with regulatory capital requirements generally are not
permitted to pay dividends. The Bank is in compliance with such requirements.
The OCC also can prohibit a national bank from engaging in an unsafe or unsound
practice in its business. Depending on the bank's financial condition, payment
of dividends could be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. Except
under certain circumstances and with prior regulatory approval, a bank may not
pay a dividend if, after so doing, it would be undercapitalized. The Bank's
ability to pay dividends in the future is, and could be, further influenced by
regulatory policies or agreements and by capital guidelines.
The Bank's ability to make funds available to the Company is also subject
to restrictions imposed by federal law on the Bank's ability to extend credit to
the Company to purchase assets from it, to issue a guarantee, acceptance or
letter of credit on its behalf (including an endorsement or standby letter of
credit), to invest in its
Page 3
<PAGE>
stock or securities, or to take such stock or securities as collateral for
loans to any borrower. Such extensions of credit and issuances generally must
be secured and are generally limited, with respect to the Company, to 10% of
the Bank's capital stock and surplus.
The OCC regulations incorporate guidelines establishing standards for
safety and soundness, including operational and managerial standards relating to
internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, assets growth and
compensation, fees and benefits, and prohibit compensation deemed excessive. If
the OCC finds that a bank has failed to meet any applicable standard, it may
require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance and,
if the bank fails to comply, the OCC must, by order, require it to correct the
deficiency.
The OCC has enforcement powers with respect to national banks for
violations of federal laws or regulations that are similar to the powers of the
Federal Reserve Board with respect to bank holding companies and nonbanking
subsidiaries. See "Bank Holding Companies," above.
FDIC. The Bank is subject to examination and regulation by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act ("FDIA") because its deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC
under the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF").
Under FDIC regulations, insured depository institution's are assigned to
one of three capital groups for insurance premium purposes -- "well
capitalized," "adequately capitalized" and "undercapitalized" -- which are
defined in the same manner as the regulations establishing the prompt corrective
action system under Section 38 of the FDIA, as discussed under "Capital Adequacy
Requirements" below. These three groups are then divided into subgroups which
are based on supervisory evaluations by the institution's primary federal
regulator, resulting in nine assessment classifications. Assessment rates for
BIF-insured banks range from 0% of insured deposits for well-capitalized banks
with minor supervisory concerns to 0.027% of insured deposits for
undercapitalized banks with substantial supervisory concerns. In addition, an
additional assessment of 1.29 basis points will be added to the regular
BIF-assessment, respectively, until December 31, 1999 in order to cover
Financing Corporation debt service payments.
The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository
institution if the FDIC determines, after a hearing, that the institution has
engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices which, as with the OCC's
enforcement authority, are not limited to cases of capital inadequacy, is in an
unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any
applicable law, regulation or order or any condition imposed in writing by the
FDIC. In addition, FDIC regulations provide that any insured institution that
falls below a 2% minimum leverage ratio (see below) will be subject to FDIC
deposit insurance termination proceedings unless it has submitted, and is in
compliance with, a capital plan with its primary federal regulator and the FDIC.
The FDIC may also suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing
process if the institution has no tangible capital. The FDIC is additionally
authorized by statute to appoint itself as conservator or receiver of an insured
depository institution (in addition to the powers of the institution's primary
federal regulatory authority) in cases, among others and upon compliance with
certain procedures, of unsafe or unsound conditions or practices or willful
violations of cease and desist orders.
CRA. Banks and bank holding companies are also subject to the Community
Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended ("CRA"). CRA requires the Bank to ascertain
and meet the credit needs of the communities it serves, including low- and
moderate-income neighborhoods. The Bank's compliance with CRA is reviewed and
evaluated by the OCC, which assigns the Bank a publicly available CRA rating at
the conclusion of the examination. Further, an assessment of CRA compliance is
also required in connection with applications for OCC approval of certain
activities, including establishing or relocating a branch office that accepts
deposits or merging or consolidating with, or acquiring the assets or assuming
the liabilities of, a federally regulated financial institution. An unfavorable
rating may be the basis for OCC denial of such an application, or approval may
be conditioned upon improvement of the applicant's CRA record. In the case of a
bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or other bank
holding company, the Federal Reserve Board will assess the CRA record of each
subsidiary bank of the applicant, and such records may be the basis for denying
the application.
In the most recently completed CRA compliance examination, conducted in
1998, the OCC assigned the Bank a rating of "Satisfactory," the second highest
of four possible ratings. The CRA regulations governing the
Page 4
<PAGE>
Company and the Bank emphasize measurements o performance in the area of
lending (specifically, the bank's home mortgage, small business, small farm
and community development loans), investment (the bank's community
development investments) and service (the bank's community development
services and the availability of its retail banking services), although
examiners are still given a degree of flexibility in taking into account
unique characteristics and needs of the bank's community and its capacity and
constraints in meeting such needs. The regulations also require certain
levels of collection and reporting of data regarding certain kinds of loans.
CAPITAL ADEQUACY REQUIREMENTS
Both the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC have adopted similar, but not
identical, "risk-based" and "leverage" capital adequacy guidelines for bank
holding companies and national banks, respectively. Under the risk-based capital
guidelines, different categories of assets are assigned different risk weights,
ranging from zero percent for risk-free assets (e.g., cash) to 100% for
relatively high-risk assets (e.g., commercial loans). These risk weights are
multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a risk-adjusted asset
base. Certain off-balance sheet items (e.g., standby letters of credit) are
added to the risk-adjusted asset base. The minimum required ratio of total
capital to risk-weighted assets for both bank holding companies and national
banks is presently 8%. At least half of the total capital is required to be
"Tier 1 capital," consisting principally of common shareholders' equity, a
limited amount of perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in the
equity. The remainder (Tier 2 capital) may consist of a limited amount of
subordinated debt, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt securities,
preferred stock and a limited amount of the general loan-loss allowance
The minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio, consisting of Tier 1 capital to average
adjusted total assets, is 3% for bank holding companies and national banks that
have the highest regulatory examination rating and are not contemplating
significant growth or expansion. All other bank holding companies and national
banks are expected to maintain a ratio of at least 1% to 2% or more above the
stated minimum. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had a Tier 1 leverage ratio
of 8.78%, and the Bank's Tier 1 leverage ratio was 6.69%.
The OCC has adopted regulations establishing capital categories for
national banks and prompt corrective actions for undercapitalized
institutions. The regulations create five capital categories: well
capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. The following table shows
as of December 31, 1998 the minimum total risk-based capital, Tier 1
risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage ratios, all of which must be satisfied
for a bank to be classified as well capitalized, adequately capitalized or
undercapitalized, respectively, together with the Company's and Bank's ratios
which in all cases exceed the well capitalized minimums:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL TIER 1 TIER 1
RISK-BASED RISK-BASED LEVERAGE
CAPITAL RATIO CAPITAL RATIO RATIO
------------- ------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Actual:
National Mercantile Bancorp ..................... 18.65% 17.38% 8.78%
Mercantile National Bank ........................ 14.75% 13.48% 6.69%
Minimum:
Well capitalized (1) ............................ 10.00% 6.00% 5.00%
Adequately capitalized .......................... 8.00% 4.00% 4.00% (2)
Undercapitalized ................................ 6.00% 4.00% 3.00%
</TABLE>
(1) A bank may not be classified as well capitalized if it is subject to a
specific agreement with OCC to meet and maintain a specific level of
capital.
(2) 3% for institutions having a composite rating of "1" in the most recent OCC
examination.
Page 5
<PAGE>
If any one or more of a bank's ratios are below the minimum ratios required
to be classified as undercapitalized, it will be classified as significantly
undercapitalized or, if in addition, its ratio of tangible equity to total
assets is 2% or less, it will be classified as critically undercapitalized. A
bank may be reclassified by the OCC to the next level below that determined by
the criteria described above if the OCC finds that it is in an unsafe or unsound
condition or if it has received a less-than-satisfactory rating for any of the
categories of asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity in its most
recent examination and the deficiency has not been corrected, except that a bank
cannot be reclassified as critically undercapitalized for such reasons.
The OCC may subject national banks to a broad range of restrictions and
regulatory requirements. A national bank may not pay management fees to any
person having control of the institution, nor, except under certain
circumstances and with prior regulatory approval, make any capital distribution
if, after doing so, it would be undercapitalized. Undercapitalized banks are
subject to increased monitoring by the OCC, are restricted in their asset
growth, must obtain regulatory approval for certain corporate activities, such
as acquisitions, new branches and new lines of business, and, in most cases,
must submit to the OCC a plan to bring their capital levels to the minimum
required in order to be classified as adequately capitalized. The OCC may not
approve a capital restoration plan unless each company that controls the bank
guarantees that the bank will comply with it. Significantly and critically
undercapitalized banks are subject to additional mandatory and discretionary
restrictions and, in the case of critically undercapitalized institutions, must
be placed into conservatorship or receivership unless the OCC and the FDIC agree
otherwise.
Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected
to act as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks and to
commit resources to support each such bank. In addition, a bank holding
company is required to guarantee that its subsidiary bank will comply with
any capital restoration plan. The amount of such a guarantee is limited to
the lesser of (i) 5% of the bank's total assets at the time it became
undercapitalized, or (ii) the amount which is necessary (or would have been
necessary) to bring the bank into compliance with all applicable capital
standards as of the time the bank fails to comply with the capital
restoration plan. A holding company guarantee of a capital restoration plan
results in a priority claim to the holding company's assets ahead of its
other unsecured creditors and shareholders that is enforceable even in the
event of the holding company's bankruptcy or the subsidiary bank's insolvency.
EMPLOYEES
As of February 28, 1999, the Company had eight officers but no employees
and the Bank had 47 full-time equivalent employees (including five of whom were
also officers of the Company). The Company and the Bank believe that the Bank's
relations with its employees are good and it has not encountered a strike or
material work stoppage.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Bank leases approximately 24,000 square feet in an office building at
1840 Century Park East, Century City, California. The effective rent under this
lease is $2.33 per square feet or $55,666 per month for the period November 1,
1995 to October 31, 2000. The effective rent for the period November 1, 2000 to
October 31, 2004 will be $2.83 per square foot or $67,607 per month. The rent is
subject to annual adjustments for changes in property taxes and operating costs.
In connection with the lease, the Bank issued the landlord a warrant to
purchase up to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company
at December 31, 1997. The exercise price of the warrant is currently $5.00
per share of Common Stock and $10.00 per share of Series A Noncumulative
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock. The warrant expires on December 31,
2002. The Company also granted the landlord registration rights with respect
to capital stock purchased by the landlord (or its assignee) pursuant to the
warrant.
The Company does not directly own or lease any property. Its administrative
offices are located at the Bank's headquarters.
Page 6
<PAGE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is from time to time a party to lawsuits in the ordinary
course of business. The Company does not believe that any lawsuits pending at
December 31, 1998 will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition
of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There was no submission of matters to a vote of shareholders during the
quarter ended December 31, 1998.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS
Until March 10, 1997, the Common Stock of the Company was traded on the
Nasdaq National market system. Since that date the Common Stock has traded on
the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, under the symbol MBLA. The Series A Noncumulative
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (the "Series A Preferred") of the Company
has traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market since issuance on June 30, 1997 under
the symbol MBLAP. The following table shows the high and low trade prices of the
Common Stock and Series A Preferred for each quarter of 1997 and 1998
as reported by the Nasdaq. Additionally, there may have been transactions at
prices other than those shown during that time.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SERIES A
COMMON STOCK PREFERRED
--------------- ----------------
QUARTER ENDED: HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
--------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
March 31, 1997.................................... 9.66 4.83 n/a n/a
June 30, 1997..................................... 8.24 5.68 n/a n/a
September 30, 1997................................ 7.25 5.75 14.50 12.75
December 31, 1997................................. 7.88 6.00 14.69 13.50
March 31, 1998.................................... 7.50 6.00 14.50 13.50
June 30, 1998..................................... 7.63 6.50 15.00 14.00
September 30, 1998................................ 6.88 5.75 13.75 12.00
December 31, 1998................................. 6.00 4.00 11.75 8.50
</TABLE>
The prices of the Common Stock stated above have been restated to reflect
both the 9:09 to 1 reverse stock split in June 1997 and the 100% common stock
dividend paid in February 1998.
At February 16, 1999, the Company had 277 shareholders of record for its
Common Stock and 26 shareholders of record for its Series A Preferred. The
number of beneficial owners for the Common Stock and Series A Preferred is
higher as many people hold their shares in "street" name. At February 16, 1999,
approximately 71.3% and 28.6% of the Common Stock and Series A Preferred,
respectively, was held in street name.
The Company has not paid a cash dividend on the Common Stock since July
1990, and has never paid a cash dividend on the Series A Preferred. The Series A
Preferred is entitled to a noncumulative cash dividend at a rate of 6.5% of its
liquidation preference quarterly on the first day of January, April, July, and
October of each year, commencing October 1, 1999, before any dividend may be
declared upon or paid upon the Common Stock. As a California corporation, under
the California General Corporation Law, generally the Company may not pay
dividends in cash or property except (ii) out of positive retained earnings or
(ii) if, after giving effect to the distribution, the Company's assets would be
at least 1.25 times its liabilities and its current assets would exceed its
current liabilities (determined on a consolidated basis under generally accepted
accounting principles). At December 31, 1998, the Company had an accumulated
deficit of $18.9 million. Further, it is unlikely the Company's assets will ever
be at least 1.25 times its liabilities. Accordingly, the Company must generate
net income of in excess of $18.9 million before it can pay a dividend in cash or
property.
Page 7
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents selected consolidated financial and other data
of the Company for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31,
1998. The information below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified
in its entirety by, the more detailed information included elsewhere including
the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 (7) 1996 1995 1994
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Interest income........................................... $ 10,081 $ 8,600 $ 8,757 $ 11,634 $ 20,900
Interest expense.......................................... 3,485 2,856 3,079 3,979 5,526
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Net interest income....................................... 6,596 5,744 5,678 7,655 15,374
Provision for credit losses............................... - - - 2,307 7,330
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Net interest income after provision for credit losses..... 6,596 5,744 5,678 5,348 8,044
Other operating income (loss)............................. 855 486 502 (1,315) (2,857)
Other operating expense (1)............................... 6,798 6,098 8,003 11,233 13,714
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)....... 653 132 (1,823) (7,200) (8,527)
Income tax provision (benefit)............................ 8 - (579) - -
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss)......................................... $ 645 $ 132 $ (1,244) $ (7,200) $ (8,527)
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
PER SHARE DATA:
Net income (loss) basic (2)............................... $ 0.95 $ 0.20 $ (1.84) $ (10.63) $ (12.68)
Net income (loss) diluted (2)............................. 0.25 0.08 (1.84) (10.63) (12.68)
Book value (period end) (3)............................... 5.35 5.02 7.14 8.86 15.23
Weighted average common shares outstanding (2):........... 677,061 677,202 677,260 677,260 672,296
BALANCE SHEET DATA - AT PERIOD END:
Assets.................................................... $ 141,623 $ 119,405 $ 109,416 $ 131,992 $ 232,979
Securities................................................ 71,849 40,478 18,630 20,417 62,056
Loans receivable.......................................... 56,972 61,252 62,547 82,012 115,284
Interest-earning assets................................... 135,621 113,880 104,177 123,429 208,634
Deposits.................................................. 106,972 97,388 103,854 120,243 207,815
Shareholders' equity...................................... 13,258 12,440 4,845 6,011 10,308
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET DATA - AVERAGE BALANCES:
Assets.................................................... $ 134,962 $ 107,801 $ 112,303 $ 149,399 $ 245,555
Securities................................................ 52,987 29,768 17,398 26,681 79,146
Loans receivable.......................................... 59,663 59,336 69,975 95,771 140,079
Interest-earning assets................................... 127,357 102,007 106,945 138,660 227,009
Deposits.................................................. 109,393 96,445 104,118 134,218 212,755
Shareholders' equity...................................... 13,013 8,541 5,500 9,033 19,086
</TABLE>
Page 8
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 (7) 1996 1995 1994
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SELECTED PERFORMANCE RATIOS:
Return (loss) on average assets................................. 0.48% 0.12% -1.11% -4.82% -3.47%
Return (loss) on average shareholders' equity................... 4.96% 1.55% -22.61% -79.71% -44.68%
Average shareholders' equity to average assets.................. 9.64% 7.92% 4.90% 6.05% 7.77%
Net interest spread............................................. 3.55% 4.05% 3.71% 3.77% 5.43%
Net yield on interest-earning assets............................ 5.18% 5.63% 5.31% 5.52% 6.77%
CAPITAL RATIOS:
Company:
Tier 1 risk-based............................................ 17.38% 16.98% 6.96% 6.96% 9.84%
Total risk-based............................................. 18.65% 18.25% 8.25% 8.25% 11.11%
Leverage..................................................... 8.78% 10.43% 4.68% 4.68% 5.65%
BANK:
Tier 1 risk-based............................................ 13.48% 10.36% 6.95% 6.95% 9.80%
Total risk-based............................................. 14.75% 11.63% 8.24% 8.24% 11.06%
Leverage..................................................... 6.69% 6.48% 4.67% 4.67% 5.62%
ASSET QUALITY:
Nonaccrual loans................................................ $ 1,505 $ 1,201 $ 928 $ 573 $ 3,426
Troubled debt restructurings (4)................................ - 5,422 5,016 5,167 5,582
Loans contractually past due ninety days or more with respect to
either principal or interest and still accruing interest..... - - 300 221 1,507
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total nonperforming loans.................................... 1,505 6,623 6,244 5,961 10,515
Other real estate owned (5)..................................... 593 777 556 581 1,529
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total nonperforming assets...................................... $ 2,098 $ 7,400 $ 6,800 $ 6,542 $ 12,044
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS:
Nonaccrual loans to loans receivable............................ 2.6% 2.0% 1.5% 0.7% 3.0%
Nonaccrual assets to total assets (6)........................... 1.5% 1.7% 1.4% 0.9% 2.1%
Allowance for credit losses to loans receivable................. 3.8% 3.3% 4.7% 4.6% 2.7%
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans................. 142.5% 168.4% 319.9% 664.0% 89.4%
Net charge-offs to average loans receivable..................... -0.2% 1.6% 1.2% 1.6% 7.8%
</TABLE>
----------------------
(1) Includes a legal settlement of $1.0 million for the year ended December
31, 1996.
(2) The weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding for
the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 was used to compute
diluted loss per share data as the use of average shares outstanding
including Common Stock equivalents would be antidilutive. The weighted
average number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share in
1998 and 1997 was 2,537,280 and 1,629,796, respectively.
(3) Book value per share numbers are based on the number of shares
outstanding at period end (including the assumed conversion of 900,000
shares of Series A Preferred into 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock at
December 31, 1998 and 1997) and does not give effect to outstanding
options and warrants to purchase Common Stock.
(4) Includes one loan, a trouble debt restructuring with a principal balance
of $5.4 million at December 31, 1997 and $4.9 million at December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994. This loan was collected in full during the fourth
quarter of 1998.
(5) Includes OREO acquired by the Company through legal foreclosure and/or
deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.
(6) Nonaccrual assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans plus OREO.
(7) On June 30, 1997 the Company sold 900,000 shares of Series A Preferred
for the net proceeds of $7.35 million.
Page 9
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
National Mercantile Bancorp (the "Company") is the holding company for
Mercantile National Bank (the "Bank"). In light of the fact that the Bank
constitutes substantially all of the business of the Company, references to the
Company in this Item 7 reflect the consolidated activities of the Company and
the Bank.
OVERVIEW
In 1998 the Company continued to successfully implement management's plan
to restructure the balance sheet and return to profitability following the $7.35
million recapitalization completed on June 30, 1997. The Company's net income
increased by $513,000 compared to 1997 (the first year in a number of years in
which the Company did not report a net loss). In addition, the Company increased
its assets by 18% and reduced its non-performing assets by 72%.
The Company recorded net income for 1998 of $645,000 or $0.25 diluted
earnings per share, compared with net income for 1997 of $132,000 or $0.08
diluted per share. This improvement in earnings was the result primarily of an
increase in net interest income of $852,000 brought about by the growth of
securities available-for-sale and an increase in other operating income of
$369,000, while other operating expenses increased by $700,000.
At December 31, 1998, the Company's total assets were $141.6 million, an
increase of $22.2 million or 18.6% from total assets of $119.4 million at
December 31, 1997. This increase was funded primarily by increases in other
borrowings of $15.8 million and deposits of $9.6 million.
Substantially all asset growth was in the investment securities portfolio.
Investment securities increased to $71.8 million at December 31, 1998 from $40.5
million at December 31, 1997. This increase was primarily due to the purchase of
$66.6 million of primarily U.S. government and federal agency securities
partially offset by sales and maturities of similar securities totaling $32.8
million. Net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale at December 31,
1998 was $211,000 compared with $38,000 at December 31, 1997. In addition,
during 1998 the Company purchased $4.0 million of privately issued corporate
bonds and a real estate mortgage investment conduit ("REMIC"), along with stock
in the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") totaling $745,000.
Loans receivable decreased $4.3 million or 7.0% during 1998 to $57.0
million at December 31, 1998 compared to $61.3 million at December 31, 1997,
reflecting, among other things, the full collection of one non-performing loan
totaling $5.4 million during 1998. Loans secured by real estate decreased to 50%
of total loans outstanding at December 31, 1998 compared to 56% at December 31,
1997. Other commercial loans increased to 43% of total loans outstanding at
December 31, 1998 compared to 35% at December 31, 1997.
The allowance for credit losses was $2.1 million or 3.8% of loans
receivable at December 31, 1998 compared to $2.0 million or 3.3% of loans
receivable at December 31, 1997. This increase was primarily the result of net
loan recoveries of $121,000 during 1998.
Nonaccrual loans increased to $1.5 million at December 31, 1998 or 2.6% of
loans receivable compared to $1.2 million or 2.0% at December 31, 1997. Other
real estate owned totaled $593,000 at year-end 1998, a decrease of $184,000 or
23.7 % from $777,000 a year earlier.
Page 10
<PAGE>
TABLE 1
OPERATIONS SUMMARY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INCREASE YEAR INCREASE
YEAR (DECREASE) ENDED (DECREASE) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
ENDED ---------------------- --------------------- --------------------------------
1998 AMOUNT % 1997 AMOUNT % 1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income.......... $ 10,081 $ 1,481 17.2% $ 8,600 $ (157) (1.8%) $ 8,757 $ 11,634 $ 20,900
Interest expense......... 3,485 629 22.0% 2,856 (223) (7.2%) 3,079 3,979 5,526
---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Net interest income...... 6,596 852 14.8% 5,744 66 1.2% 5,678 7,655 15,374
Provision for credit
losses................. - - - - - - 2,307 7,330
Other operating income... 855 369 75.9% 486 (16) (3.2%) 502 (1,315) (2,857)
Other operating expense.. 6,798 700 11.5% 6,098 (1,905) (23.8%) 8,003 11,233 13,714
---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- --------
Income (loss) before
income taxes (benefit).. 653 521 394.7% 132 1,955 (107.2%) (1,823) (7,200) (8,527)
Income taxes (benefit)... 8 8 0.0% - 579 (100.0%) (579) - -
---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Net income (loss)....... $ 645 $ 513 388.6% $ 132 $ 1,376 (110.6%) $ (1,244) $ (7,200) $ (8,527)
---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
</TABLE>
OPERATIONS SUMMARY ANALYSIS
NET INTEREST INCOME
The Company's earnings depend largely upon the difference between the
income earned on its loans and other investments and the interest paid on its
deposits and borrowed funds. This difference is net interest income. The
Company's ability to generate net interest income is largely dependent on its
ability to maintain sound asset quality and appropriate levels of capital and
liquidity. The Company's inability to maintain strong asset quality, capital or
liquidity may adversely affect (i) the ability to accommodate desirable
borrowing customers, thereby inhibiting growth in quality higher-yielding
earning assets; (ii) the ability to attract comparatively stable, lower-cost
deposits; and (iii) the costs of wholesale funding sources.
1998 COMPARED TO 1997
Net interest income increased $852,000 totaling $6.6 million during 1998
compared to $5.7 million during 1997. The components of net interest income
continued to change during 1998, reflecting an increase in interest income from
investment securities, compared to 1997. Average interest-earning assets
increased during 1998 to $127.4 million compared to $102.0 million during 1997.
This $25.4 million or 24.9% increase in average interest-earning assets was
primarily the result of a $23.2 million increase in average investment
securities which was funded by the increase in average deposits of $12.9 million
combined with a $9.1 million increase in average other borrowings. The average
yield on interest-earning assets was 7.92% during 1998, a decrease from the
average yield of 8.43% during the year ended 1997, primarily as a result of
increased amount of investment securities which represented a higher proportion
of interest-earning assets during 1998 compared to 1997, combined with a 75
basis point decline in market interest rates (federal funds), particularly
during the fourth quarter of 1998. During 1998, the weighted average rates paid
on interest-bearing liabilities remained virtually unchanged compared with 1997
(4.37% in 1998 versus 4.38% in 1997) primarily resulting from increases in other
borrowing during 1998. As a result, the net yield on interest-earning assets
decreased to 5.18% during 1998, from 5.63% during 1997.
Average loans receivable increased to $59.7 million in 1998 from $59.3
million in 1997. The majority of this increase was reflected by the growth of
the commercial loan portfolio due to the Company's emphasis in this area offset
by the payoffs of loans primarily secured by real estate. However, during the
fourth quarter of 1998 one nonperforming loan with a balance of $5.4 million was
fully collected and contributed to loans receivable at December 31, 1998
dropping $4.3 million below the level at December 31, 1997.
Average total investment securities increased to $53.0 million during 1998
from $29.8 million during 1997. This increase was primarily driven by the
increase in deposits and borrowings, and a reduction in the Company's liquidity
needs as a result of termination of the regulatory agreements in the latter part
of 1997. The average yield on investment securities decreased to 6.32% during
1998 from 6.52% during 1997. This decrease reflects the overall downward trend
in market interest rates, which induced the issuers of securities held by the
Company with
Page 11
<PAGE>
an optional principal redemption feature to exercise their "call" options.
The Company reinvested the proceeds in securities with lower yields
reflecting then current market conditions. During 1998, the composition of
the Company's investment securities portfolio shifted from one which was
primarily comprised of fixed-rate callable federal agency securities to a
portfolio primarily comprised of fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities
("MBS") collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMO") and real estate mortgage
investment conduits ("REMIC"). At December 31, 1998 the Company held no
investment securities with a call option feature other than the embedded
prepayment option associated with mortgage-related securities. Further,
during 1998 the Company invested approximately $17.5 million in securities
that bear interest at rates which adjust monthly based on the London
Inter-Bank Offer Rate ("LIBOR") interest rate index.
Average non interest-bearing deposits increased 24.6% to $41.1 million
during 1998 compared to $33.0 million during 1997, while average
interest-bearing deposits increased 7.6% to $68.3 million during 1998 compared
to $63.5 million during 1997. The growth in average deposits was the result of
increased marketing efforts particularly in the entertainment and escrow
divisions. Offsetting these increases was a planned decrease in higher rate
nonrelationship "money desk" deposits.
Average borrowed funds, represented collectively by federal funds
purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings,
increased to $11.6 million during 1998 compared to $1.8 million during 1997.
This $9.8 million increase facilitated the growth of the investment securities
portfolio during 1998. This increase in average borrowed funds was primarily the
result of borrowings from the FHLB the majority of which bear interest at rates
that are adjusted monthly based on the LIBOR interest rate index. The proceeds
from these borrowings were used to purchase investment securities that bear
interest at rates adjusted monthly based on the LIBOR interest rate index, which
provided the Company with a positive spread.
TABLE 2
RATIOS TO AVERAGE ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net interest income................. 4.89% 5.33% 5.06% 5.12% 6.26%
Other operating income (loss)....... 0.63% 0.45% 0.45% (0.88%) (1.16%)
Provision for credit losses......... 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (1.54%) (2.99%)
Other operating expense............. (5.04%) (5.66%) (7.13%) (7.52%) (5.58%)
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Income (loss) before income taxes
(benefit)........................ 0.48% 0.12% (1.62%) (4.82%) (3.47%)
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Net income (loss)................ 0.48% 0.12% (1.11%) (4.82%) (3.47%)
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -----------
</TABLE>
1997 COMPARED TO 1996
Net interest income was $5.7 million in both 1997 and 1996. However, the
components of net interest income changed during 1997, reflecting an increase in
interest income from investment securities offset by a corresponding decrease in
interest income from loans, compared to 1996. Average interest-earning assets
decreased during 1997 to $102.0 million compared to $106.9 million during 1996.
This decrease was primarily the result of a $10.6 million reduction in average
loans receivable which was partially offset by the investment of $7.35 million
of net proceeds raised from the racapitalization combined with an increase in
other borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. During the
first half of 1997, the Company's average interest-earning assets decreased
primarily due to the reduction of the Company's deposits. However, this trend
reversed during the second half of 1997, as the Company began to experience
growth of its average interest-earning assets created by the net proceeds of the
recapitalization and an increase in borrowings. The weighted average yield on
interest-earning assets was 8.43% during 1997, compared to the weighted average
yield of 8.19% during 1996, primarily as a result of increased volume and yield
of investment securities. During 1997, the weighted average rate paid on
interest-
Page 12
<PAGE>
bearing liabilities decreased to 4.38% from 4.48% for 1996. As a result, the
net yield on interest-earning assets increased from 5.31% during 1996 to
5.63% during 1997.
Average loans receivable decreased to $59.3 million in 1997 from $70.0
million in 1996, a decrease of $10.7 million or 15.3%. The majority of this
decrease was reflected by the payoffs and maturities primarily of commercial
loans secured by real estate. The decrease was partially offset by the growth of
the commercial loan portfolio due to the Company's emphasis in this area.
Average total investment securities increased to $29.8 million during 1997
from $17.4 million during 1996. This increase was primarily driven by the net
proceeds of the recapitalization, reduction in the Company's liquidity needs as
a result of the termination of regulatory agreements and an increase in the
Company's borrowings. The weighted average yield on investment securities
increased to 6.52% during 1997 compared to 5.69% during 1996. During 1997 and
1996, the Company disposed of its lower yielding investment securities and
reinvested the proceeds into higher yielding investment securities, resulting in
the increased average yields during 1997.
Average noninterest-bearing deposits decreased to $33.0 million during 1997
from $36.5 million during 1996. Similarly, average interest-bearing deposits
decreased to $63.5 million during 1997 from $67.6 million during 1996. The
decreases occurred primarily during the first six months of 1997, prior to the
completion of the racapitalization and during the time in which the Company was
subject to regulatory enforcement actions. However, during the last six months
of 1997, average deposits increased as a result of increased marketing efforts.
Average securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased to $1.6
million during 1997 compared to $1.1 million during 1996. In addition, the
Company borrowed $3.5 million from the FHLB at the end of the fourth quarter of
1997, which accounted for the increase in average other borrowings from 1996.
INTEREST RATE SPREAD AND NET INTEREST MARGIN
The Company analyzes its earnings performance using, among other measures,
the interest rate spread and net yield on interest-earning assets, or net
interest margin. The interest rate spread represents the difference between the
weighted average yield received on interest-earning assets and the weighted
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income, when
expressed as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets, is referred
to as the net yield on interest-earning assets. The Company's net yield on
interest-earning assets is affected by changes in the yields earned on assets
and rates paid on liabilities, referred to as rate changes. Interest rates
charged on the Company's loans are affected principally by the demand for such
loans, the supply of money available for lending purposes, and other competitive
factors. These factors are in turn affected by general economic conditions and
other factors beyond the Company's control, such as federal economic policies,
the general supply of money in the economy, legislative tax policies,
governmental budgetary matters, and the action of the Federal Reserve Board.
Table 3 presents information concerning the change in interest income and
interest expense attributable to changes in average volume and average rate.
Table 4 presents the weighted average yield on each category of earning assets,
the weighted average rate paid on each category of interest-bearing liabilities,
and the resulting interest rate spread and net yield on interest-earning assets
for each year in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998. Yields on
tax-exempt investment securities presented in Table 4 have not been adjusted to
a fully taxable equivalent to recognize the income tax savings and to facilitate
comparison of taxable and tax-exempt assets because the Company does not realize
such tax benefit due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards.
The Company's net yield on interest-earning assets remains high in
comparison with the interest rate spread due to the continued significance of
noninterest-bearing demand deposits relative to total funding sources.
Average noninterest-bearing demand deposits totaled $41.1 million,
representing 37.6% of average deposits, during 1998, compared to $33.0
million, representing 34.2% of average deposits, during 1997. Of these
noninterest-bearing demand deposits during 1998, $15.5 million or 37.8% of
average noninterest-bearing deposits were represented by real estate title
and escrow company deposits, compared to $9.8 million or 29.6% of average
noninterest-bearing deposits during 1997. While these deposits are
noninterest-bearing, they are not cost-free funds. Customer service expenses,
primarily costs related to external accounting and data processing services
provided to title and escrow company depositors are incurred by the Company
to the extent that such depositors maintain certain average
noninterest-bearing deposits. Customer service expense is classified as other
operating expense. If customer service expenses related to escrow customers
had been classified as interest expense, the Company's reported net interest
income for 1998, 1997 and 1996, would have been reduced by $556,000, $282,000
and $349,000, respectively. Similarly, this would create identical reductions
in other operating expense. The net yield on interest-earning assets for
1998, 1997 and 1996, would have decreased 44 basis points, 28 basis points,
and 33 basis points, respectively.
Page 13
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 3
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN INTEREST INCOME/EXPENSE DUE TO CHANGE IN
AVERAGE VOLUME AND AVERAGE RATE (1)
1998 VS 1997 1997 VS 1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCREASE (DECREASED) DUE TO: NET INCREASE (DECREASED) DUE TO: NET
---------------------------- INCREASE ---------------------------- INCREASE
VOLUME RATE (DECREASE) VOLUME RATE (DECREASE)
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Income:
Federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreement to resell..... $ 90 $ (18) $ 72 $ (351) $ 37 $ (314)
Interest-bearing deposits with other
financial institutions.................. 13 (3) 10 - 3 3
Securities held-to-maturity............... (1,060) - (1,060) 1,192 (60) 1,132
Securities available-for-sale............. 2,474 (5) 2,469 (264) 82 (182)
Loans receivable (2)...................... 33 (43) (10) (1,025) 229 (796)
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
Total interest-earning assets.......... 1,550 (69) 1,481 (448) 291 (157)
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
Interest Expense:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Demand................................. 3 2 5 17 (3) 14
Money market and savings............... 193 19 212 (6) 6 -
Time certificates of deposit:
$100,000 or more.................... 312 12 324 49 (4) 45
Under $100,000...................... (445) (19) (464) (363) 6 (357)
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
Total time certificates of deposit..... (133) (7) (140) (314) 2 (312)
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
Total interest-bearing deposits........ 63 14 77 (303) 5 (298)
Other borrowings.......................... 446 64 510 - 7 7
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase..... 36 6 42 11 57 68
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities....................... 545 84 629 (292) 69 (223)
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
Net interest income.................... $ 1,005 $ (153) $ 852 $ (156) $ 222 $ 66
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
---------
(1) The change in interest income or interest expense that is attributable to
both changes in average balance and average rate has been allocated to
the changes due to (i) average balance and (ii) average rate in
proportion to the relationship of the absolute amounts of changes in
each.
(2) Table does not include interest income that would have been earned on
nonaccrual loans.
Page 14
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 4
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND
ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME
1998 1997 1996
-------------------------------- ---------------------------------- -------------------------------
INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE
AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/
AMOUNT EXPENSE RATE AMOUNT EXPENSE RATE AMOUNT EXPENSE RATE
----------- --------- -------- ------------ --------- --------- ------------ --------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased
under agreements to
resell...................... $ 14,493 $ 782 5.40% $ 12,862 $ 710 5.52% $ 19,572 $ 1,024 5.23%
Interest-bearing deposits
with other financial
institutions................ 214 13 6.07% 41 3 7.33% - - -
Securities held-to-maturity... 2,019 134 6.64% 17,960 1,194 6.65% 888 62 6.98%
Securities available-for-sale. 50,968 3,215 6.31% 11,808 746 6.32% 16,510 928 5.62%
Loans receivable (1) (2)...... 59,663 5,937 9.95% 59,336 5,947 10.02% 69,975 6,743 9.64%
---------- --------- ------------ --------- ------------ -------
Total interest earning
assets...................... 127,357 10,081 7.92% 102,007 8,600 8.43% 106,945 8,757 8.19%
--------- --------- -------
Noninterest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks -
demand..................... 6,403 4,957 5,878
Other assets................. 3,225 3,491 2,887
Allowance for credit losses.. (2,023) (2,654) (3,407)
---------- ------------ -----------
Total assets.................. $ 134,962 $ 107,801 $ 112,303
---------- ------------ -----------
---------- ------------ -----------
</TABLE>
Page 15
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 4 (CONTINUED)
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND
ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME
1998 1997 1996
----------------------------- --------------------------------- ---------------------------------
INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE
AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/
AMOUNT EXPENSE RATE AMOUNT EXPENSE RATE AMOUNT EXPENSE RATE
-------- --------- -------- ------------ --------- -------- ------------ --------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Liabilities and shareholders'
equity:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Demand...................... $ 7,467 $ 95 1.27% $ 7,239 $ 90 1.24% $ 5,914 $ 76 1.29%
Money market and savings.... 27,876 846 3.03% 21,359 634 2.97% 21,556 634 2.94%
Time certificates of
deposit:
$100,000 or more........... 13,955 788 5.65% 8,341 464 5.56% 7,465 419 5.61%
Under $100,000............. 18,985 1,104 5.82% 26,518 1,568 5.91% 32,665 1,925 5.89%
--------- --------- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------
Total time certificates of
deposit................... 32,940 1,892 5.74% 34,859 2,032 5.83% 40,130 2,344 5.84%
--------- --------- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------
Total interest-bearing
deposits................... 68,283 2,833 4.15% 63,457 2,756 4.34% 67,600 3,054 4.52%
Other borrowings............. 9,276 517 5.57% 143 7 4.89% -- -- --
Federal funds purchased and
securities sold under
agreements to repurchase... 2,279 135 5.92% 1,637 93 5.68% 1,140 25 2.19%
--------- --------- --------- --------- ------------ ---------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities................ 79,838 3,485 4.37% 65,237 2,856 4.38% 68,740 3,079 4.48%
--------- --------- ---------
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities:
Noninterest bearing demand
deposits.................. 41,110 32,988 36,518
Other liabilities........... 1,001 1,035 1,545
Shareholders' equity......... 13,013 8,541 5,500
---------- ---------- ------------
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity....... $ 134,962 $ 107,801 $ 112,303
---------- ---------- ------------
---------- ---------- ------------
Net interest income (spread) $ 6,596 3.55% $ 5,744 4.05% $ 5,678 3.71%
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
Net yield on earning
assets (2)................. 5.18% 5.63% 5.31%
</TABLE>
---------
(1) The average balance of nonperforming loans has been included in loans
receivable.
(2) Yields and amounts earned on loans receivable include loan fees of
$200,000, $130,000 and $24,000 for the years ended December 31, 1998,
1997 and 1996 respectively.
Page 16
<PAGE>
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Provisions for credit losses charged to operations reflect management's
judgment of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and are determined
through periodic analysis of the loan portfolio. This analysis includes a
detailed review of the classification and categorization of problem loans and
loans to be charged off; an assessment of the overall quality and collectibility
of the portfolio; and consideration of the loan loss experience, trends in
problem loan concentrations of credit risk, as well as current and expected
future economic conditions (particularly Southern California). Management, in
combination with an outside firm, performs a periodic risk and credit analysis
the results of which are reported to the Board of Directors.
For 1998, 1997 and 1996, the Company did not record a provision for credit
losses. In 1998 net loan recoveries were $121,000 compared to net charge offs of
$946,000 in 1997 and $836,000 million in 1996.
The Company did not record a provision for credit losses for the past three
years due to a combination of the leveling-off of net charge offs, a change in
the risk profile of the loan portfolio, the continued reduction in problem
loans, the improvement of the Southern California economy and improved
collections that have sustained the level of the allowance for credit losses.
However, credit quality is affected by many factors beyond the control of the
Company, including local and national economies, and facts may exist which are
not known to the Company which adversely affect the likelihood of repayment of
various loans in the loan portfolio and realization of collateral upon a
default. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the Company will not
sustain loan losses materially in excess of the allowance for credit losses. In
addition, the OCC, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically
reviews our allowance for credit losses and could require additional provisions
for credit losses.
OTHER OPERATING INCOME
Other operating income was $855,000, $486,000 and $502,000 in 1998, 1997
and 1996, respectively. A breakdown of other operating income by category is
reflected below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 5
OTHER OPERATING INCOME
1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OTHER OPERATING (LOSSES) INCOME:
SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS:
Net gain (loss) on sale of securities available-
for-sale............................................ $ 39 $ (37) $ (3)
FEE INCOME:
International services.............................. 84 128 124
Investment services................................. 43 18 73
Deposit and other customer services................. 540 377 308
OTHER:
Reconveyance fees................................... 81 - -
Gain on other real estate owned and fixed assets.... 68 - -
------------ ------------ ------------
Total other operating income....................... $ 855 $ 486 $ 502
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS
During 1998, the Company continued to restructure its investment portfolio
in an effort to maintain a market yield, reduce volatility to unexpected market
changes, and stagger maturities to meet overall liquidity requirements.
Page 17
<PAGE>
Accordingly, during 1998, the Company sold $6.1 million of investment securities
available-for-sale, realizing a net gain of $26,000. In addition, as a result of
the overall downward trend in market interest rates during 1998, issuers of
securities with an optional principal redemption feature redeemed, prior to
maturity, $26.7 million of investment securities held by the Company, resulting
in a net gain to the Company of $13,000. The net losses of $37,000 and $3,000
realized in 1997 and 1996, respectively, resulted from the Company's sale of
low-yielding securities for reinvestment into higher-yielding assets. The net
unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale were $211,000 and $38,000 at
December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
FEE AND OTHER INCOME
Fee income related to international, investment and deposit services
increased from $505,000 in 1996 to $523,000 in 1997 and $667,000 in 1998. The
increase in 1998 was primarily due to adjustments effective December 1, 1997 in
fee structure of deposit-related services to ensure such services are
competitively priced, and increased volume due to deposit growth of
"transaction" type accounts during 1998. Fee income related to investment
services increased as a result of a restructuring of the means by which the
services are delivered, described below, while fee income related to
international service continued to decline during 1998 since the international
services department was closed in December 1996, resulting in reduced letter of
credit and foreign exchange functions during 1998.
Other income for 1998 included $81,000 of reconveyance fees associated with
the full collection of one large nonperforming loan and a $68,000 gain on sale
of OREO and a Company automobile.
During 1997, the Company restructured its investment service division by
forming a strategic alliance with an investment brokerage firm. This strategic
alliance enables the Bank to continue to provide a wide array of products at
significantly reduced overhead costs.
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Other operating expenses totaled $6.8 million in 1998 compared to $6.1
million in 1997 and $8.0 million in 1996. A breakdown of other operating expense
by category is reflected below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 6
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries and related benefits.............. $ 3,168 $ 2,887 $ 2,718
Net occupancy.............................. 903 806 793
Furniture and equipment.................... 287 200 298
Printing and communications................ 231 229 211
Insurance and regulatory assessments....... 304 516 629
Customer services.......................... 797 537 607
Computer data processing................... 264 292 359
Legal settlement........................... - - 1,000
Legal services............................. 146 172 503
Other professional services................ 300 225 640
Other real estate owned expenses........... 141 21 39
Promotion and other expenses............... 257 213 206
------------ ------------ ------------
Total other operating expenses......... $ 6,798 $ 6,098 $ 8,003
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
Page 18
<PAGE>
Salaries and related benefits increased to $3.2 million in 1998 compared to
$2.9 million in 1997. This increase was the result of the Company's continued
expansion of its entertainment and business banking loan production staff to
augment growth in response to the recapitalization completed in June 1997. The
$97,000 increase from 1997 to 1998 in net occupancy expense was caused by
increased escalation and operating costs associated with the Company's corporate
and retail premises lease. Furniture and equipment expenses increased $87,000
from 1997 to 1998 as a result of the replacement of virtually all internal
computer equipment during 1998 as part of the Company's program to address year
2000 issues and upgrade existing equipment. This caused an acceleration of
depreciation expense during 1998 associated with the computer equipment that was
replaced. Customer service expenses increased $260,000 from 1997 to 1998 caused
primarily by increased cost associated with the growth in average real estate
title and escrow deposits (which averaged $15.5 million during 1998 compared to
$9.8 million during 1997). Other professional services increased $75,000 from
1997 to 1998 primarily as a result of the Company commencing to remunerate
outside members of the Board of Directors, along with the engagement of an
investment advisory firm to assist with the growth of investment securities.
OREO expenses increased $120,000 from 1997 to 1998 primarily as a result of a
valuation adjustment totaling $100,000 recorded during 1998. However, these
increases in other operating expenses in 1998 compared to 1997 were partially
offset by a $212,000 decrease in FDIC insurance premiums and regulatory caused
by reductions in the FDIC insurance rate.
The primary reason for the 23.8% reduction in other operating expense
during 1997 compared to 1996 is attributable to the $1.0 million legal
settlement recognized during 1996. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. Salaries and related benefits increased $169,000 from 1996
to 1997 due to the Company's expansion of its loan and deposit production staff
in response to the recapitalization completed on June 30, 1997. Other operating
expense in 1996 also included $145,000 for consulting services directly related
to efforts associated with the federal income tax refund. However, significant
other operating expense reductions were achieved in 1997 compared to 1996 in the
areas of insurance and regulatory assessments, legal services and other
professional services.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future
tax consequences of existing differences between financial reporting and tax
reporting basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating losses and
tax credit carryforwards, using enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets
will be reduced through a valuation allowance whenever it becomes more likely
than not that all or some portion will not be realized. Deferred income taxes
(benefit) represents the net change in deferred tax asset or liability balance
during the year. This amount, together with income taxes currently payable or
refundable in the current year, represents the total tax expense (benefit) for
the year. At December 31, 1998, the Company's net deferred tax asset totaled
$9.0 million, which was fully reserved.
The Company's deferred tax asset consists primarily of federal and state
NOL's that total $21.2 and $9.8 million, respectively. Federal income tax laws
permit the Company to carry back NOL's two years (three years prior to 1998) to
offset taxable income in those periods, if any, and forward twenty years
(fifteen years prior to 1998) to offset taxable income in those future periods.
Under special circumstances losses may be carried back up to 10 years.
California franchise tax laws do not provide for the carryback of such losses
and generally permit one-half of net operating losses to be carried forward five
years. The federal NOL's expire beginning in 2007 through 2012 and the
California carryforwards expire beginning in 1999 through 2002.
No income tax provision was recorded during 1998 (other than alternative
minimum tax of $8,000) and 1997 due to the utilization of previously
unrecognized tax benefits to offset current period tax liability. During 1996
the Company recognized a tax benefit for federal income tax purposes of
approximately $579,000 (including $43,000 in interest) related to a refund of
prior years taxes from the carryback of a portion of the Company's NOL's for
which a tax benefit had not been previously recognized.
Additionally, federal and state income tax laws provide that, following an
ownership change of a corporation with a net operating loss, a net unrealized
built-in loss, or tax credit carryovers, the amount of annual post-ownership
change taxable income that can be offset by pre-ownership change NOLs or
recognized built-in losses generally cannot exceed a prescribed annual
limitation. The annual limitation generally equals the product of the
Page 19
<PAGE>
fair market value of the corporation immediately before the ownership change
(subject to certain adjustments) and the federal long-term tax-exempt rate
prescribed monthly by the Internal Revenue Service. If such limitations were
to apply to the Company, the ability of the Company to reduce future taxable
income by the NOL's could be severely limited.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
REGULATORY CAPITAL
At December 31, 1998, the Company's and Bank's Tier 1 capital, which is
comprised of shareholders' equity as modified by certain regulatory adjustments,
amounted to $13.0 million and $9.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 1997,
the Company's and the Bank's Tier 1 capital amounted to $12.4 million and $7.4
million, respectively. On June 30, 1998 the Company contributed $2.0 million of
capital to the Bank which enabled it to increase its legal lending limit and
provide capital for continued growth. The following table sets forth the
regulatory standards for well capitalized institutions and the capital ratios
for the Company and the Bank as of December 31, 1998 and 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 7
REGULATORY CAPITAL INFORMATION
OF THE COMPANY AND BANK
DECEMBER 31,
WELL CAPITALIZED ------------------------
STANDARDS 1998 1997
------------------ ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
COMPANY:
Tier 1 leverage................................. 5.00% 8.78% 10.43%
Tier 1 risk-based capital....................... 6.00% 17.38% 16.98%
Total risk-based capital........................ 10.00% 18.65% 18.25%
BANK:
Tier 1 leverage................................. 5.00% 6.69% 6.48%
Tier 1 risk-based capital....................... 6.00% 13.48% 10.36%
Total risk-based capital........................ 10.00% 14.75% 11.63%
</TABLE>
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
The objective of liquidity management is the ability to maintain cash flow
adequate to fund the Company's operations and meet obligations and other
commitments on a timely and cost effective basis. The Company manages to this
objective through the selection of asset and liability maturity mixes. The
Company's liquidity position is enhanced by its ability to raise additional
funds as needed borrowing or accessing the wholesale deposit market.
The Company's deposit base provides the majority of the Company's funding
requirements. This relatively stable and low-cost source of funds has, along
with shareholders' equity, provided 90.7% and 97.4% of funding for average total
assets in 1998 and 1997, respectively. This reduction of 6.7% was directly
attributable to the increased volume of LIBOR interest rate index based
borrowings, the proceeds of which were used to purchase LIBOR based investment
securities.
A significant portion of remaining funding of average total assets is
provided by other borrowings, specifically FHLB advances, which averaged $9.3
million during 1998 compared to $143,000 during 1997. Additionally, the Company
increased its funding from short-term federal funds purchases and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase, which averaged $2.3 million and $1.6
million during 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Liquidity is also provided by reductions in assets such as federal funds
sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. The aggregate of federal
funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell averaged
Page 20
<PAGE>
$14.5 million during 1998, as compared to $12.9 million during 1997. This
increase resulted primarily from the growth in noninterest-bearing deposits
and a lack of growth in loans receivable during 1998.
Liquidity is also provided by the portfolio of available-for-sale
securities, which averaged $51.0 million during 1998. In addition, the unpledged
portion of investment securities at December 31, 1998 totaled $48.6 million and
would be available as collateral for borrowings. Maturing loans also provide
liquidity, of which $26.0 million of the Bank's loans are scheduled to mature in
1999.
ASSET LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
The principal objective of the Company's asset/liability management is to
maximize the net yield on interest-earning assets subject to margin volatility
and liquidity constraints. Margin volatility results when the rate reset (or
repricing) characteristics of the Company's interest-earning assets are
materially different from those of its interest-bearing liabilities. Liquidity
risk results from the mismatching of asset and liability cash flows. Management
chooses asset/liability strategies that are intended to promote stable earnings
and reliable funding. Interest rate risk and funding positions are kept within
limits established by the Company's Board of Directors to ensure that
risk-taking is not excessive and that liquidity is properly managed.
The Company has established three measurement processes to quantify and
manage exposure to interest rate risk: net interest income simulation modeling,
gap analysis, and present value of equity analysis. Net interest income
simulations, provided to the Company by an outside firm, are used to identify
the direction and severity of interest rate risk exposure across a twelve month
forecast horizon. Gap analysis provides insight into structural mismatches of
assets and liability repricing characteristics. Present value of equity
calculations, also provided to the Company by an outside firm, is used to
estimate the theoretical price sensitivity of shareholder equity to changes in
interest rates.
Generally, an asset sensitive gap indicates that net interest income will
improve during a period of rising interest rates while a liability sensitive gap
indicates that net interest income will improve during a period of declining
interest rates. Conversely, an asset sensitive gap indicates that net interest
income will drop during a period declining interest rates, while a liability
sensitive gap indicates that net interest income will drop during a period of
rising interest rates. The gap report is based on the contractual cash flows of
the Company's assets and liabilities. The actual life of these assets and
liabilities may differ substantially from their contractual terms however. For
example, while checking accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, experience
suggests that these accounts will have an average life of several years.
Table 8 compares the Company's interest rate gap position as of December
31, 1998 and 1997. The gap report shows the Company's cumulative one year
interest rate liability sensitivity gap of $7.6 million at December 31, 1998, a
change from as asset sensitivity gap of $110,000 at December 31, 1997. This
change resulted from the Company's efforts to lower its exposure to decreases in
net interest income due to a rapid decline in interest rates. The Company has
increased its investment securities portfolio that reprice after one year to
$54.6 million at December 31, 1998 compared to $38.5 million at December 31,
1997 and reduced its loan receivable portfolio that reprice within one year to
$40.0 million at December 31, 1998 compared to $45.8 million at December 31,
1997. These changes were offset by an increase in borrowings, which reprice
within one year to $20.3 million at December 31, 1998 compared to $8.6 million
at December 31, 1999. Due to the nature of the Company's liabilities which
reprice within one year, during a period of slowly rising or falling interest
rates it is not expected that rates paid on these liabilities will change to the
same degree as the Company's assets since interest rates paid on the Company's
demand, savings and money market deposit accounts historically have not
increased or decreased proportionately with changes in market interest rates.
Since interest rate changes do not affect all categories of assets and
liabilities equally or simultaneously, a cumulative gap analysis alone cannot be
used to evaluate the Company's interest rate sensitivity position. To supplement
traditional gap analysis, the Company uses simulation modeling to estimate the
potential effects of changing interest rates. This process allows the Company to
fully explore the complex relationships within the gap over time and various
interest rate scenarios.
Page 21
<PAGE>
At December 31, 1998 and 1997, the Company's distribution of rate-sensitive
assets and liabilities was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 8
RATE-SENSITIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
DECEMBER 31, 1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MATURING OR REPRICING IN
-------------------------------------------------------------------
LESS AFTER THREE AFTER ONE
THAN MONTHS YEAR
THREE BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN AFTER
MONTHS ONE YEAR 5 YEARS 5 YEARS TOTAL
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rate-Sensitive Assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with other
financial institutions....................... $ - $ - $ - $ - $ --
Federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell......... 6,800 - - - 6,800
Securities held-to-maturity................... - - - - --
Securities available-for-sale ................ 15,881 1,414 2,183 50,980 70,458
FRB and other stock, at cost.................. - - - 1,391 1,391
Loans receivable.............................. 23,562 16,391 11,738 5,281 56,972
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total rate-sensitive assets.................. 46,243 17,805 13,921 57,652 135,621
Rate-Sensitive Liabilities: (1)
Interest bearing deposits:
Demand, money market and
savings................................... 30,550 - - - 30,550
Time certificates of deposit................. 9,743 11,089 7,668 547 29,047
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase.......... 1,000 - - - 1,000
Other borrowings.............................. 15,800 3,500 - - 19,300
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total rate-sensitive liabilities 57,093 14,589 7,668 547 79,897
Interest rate-sensitivity gap ................ (10,850) 3,216 6,253 57,105 55,724
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative interest rate-sensitivity gap...... $ (10,850) $ (7,634) $ (1,381) $ 55,724
--------- --------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Cumulative ratio of rate sensitive assets to
rate-sensitive liabilities 81% 89% 98% 170%
--------- --------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
(1) Deposits which are subject to immediate withdrawal are presented as
repricing within three months or less. The distribution of other time
deposits is based on scheduled maturities.
Page 22
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 8
RATE-SENSITIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
DECEMBER 31, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MATURING OR REPRICING IN
-------------------------------------------------------------------
LESS AFTER THREE AFTER ONE
THAN MONTHS YEAR
THREE BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN AFTER
MONTHS ONE YEAR 5 YEARS 5 YEARS TOTAL
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Rate-Sensitive Assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with other
financial institutions....................... $ - $ 250 $ - $ - $ 250
Federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell......... 11,900 - - - 11,900
Securities held-to-maturity................... - 2,000 12,000 - 14,000
Securities available-for-sale ................ - - 13,946 11,886 25,832
FRB and other stock, at cost.................. - - - 646 646
Loans receivable.............................. 26,258 19,520 13,325 2,149 61,252
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total rate-sensitive assets.................. 38,158 21,770 39,271 14,681 113,880
Rate-Sensitive Liabilities: (1)
Interest bearing deposits:
Demand, money market and
savings................................... 30,601 - - - 30,601
Time certificates of deposit................. 8,112 12,555 10,721 - 31,388
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase.......... 50 5,000 - - 5,050
Other borrowings.............................. - 3,500 - - 3,500
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total rate-sensitive liabilities 38,763 21,055 10,721 - 70,539
Interest rate-sensitivity gap ................ (605) 715 28,550 14,681 43,341
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative interest rate-sensitivity gap...... $ (605) $ 110 $ 28,660 $ 43,341
--------- --------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Cumulative ratio of rate sensitive assets to
rate-sensitive liabilities 98% 100% 141% 161%
--------- --------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
(1) Deposits which are subject to immediate withdrawal are presented as
repricing within three months or less. The distribution of other time
deposits is based on scheduled maturities.
Page 23
<PAGE>
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The Company classifies its investment securities as held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale. Investment securities which the Company has the ability and
intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities. All
other investment securities are classified as available-for-sale. Total
investment securities increased $30.6 million or 76.8% at December 31, 1998 to
$70.5 million compared to $39.8 million at December 31, 1997. The average
duration of total securities at December 31, 1998 was 2.65 years compared with
1.45 years at December 31, 1997. In addition, the Company holds equity
securities of the Reserve Bank, FHLB and Pacific Coast Bankers Bank ("PCBB")
totaling $1.4 million and $646,000 at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
HELD-TO-MATURITY
There were no held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 1998 compared to
$14.0 million at December 31, 1997.
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
At December 31, 1998, securities available-for-sale totaled $70.5 million,
an increase of $44.7 million from $25.8 million at December 31, 1997. This
increase resulted from the investment of the funds generated by the growth in
deposits and increased borrowings.
As illustrated in Table 9 below, the Company's investment portfolio
generally consisted of U.S. government and federal agency securities,
mortgage-related securities including MBS's, CMOs and privately issued corporate
bonds (Moody's A2 and Aa3 rated) and (REMIC's) (Moody's AAA rated), at December
31, 1998 and 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 9
ESTIMATED FAIR VALUES OF AND UNREALIZED
GAINS AND LOSSES ON INVESTMENT SECURITIES
DECEMBER 31, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------
TOTAL GROSS GROSS ESTIMATED TOTAL GROSS GROSS ESTIMATED
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
COST GAINS LOSS VALUE COST GAINS LOSS VALUE
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities held-to-maturity:
U.S. government and federal
agency securities................. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 14,000 $ 10 $ - $ 14,010
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities........... $ 1,001 $ 7 $ - $ 1,008 $ 1,002 $ 3 $ - $ 1,005
FHLMC/FNMA-issued mortgage
pass through certificates......... 16,933 100 3 17,030 4,327 22 - 4,349
U.S. government and federal
agency securities................. - - - - 15,488 35 1 15,522
CMO's and REMIC's issued by U.S.
government and federal agencies... 48,278 146 41 48,383 4,977 3 24 4,956
Privately issued corporate bonds,
CMO's and REMIC's securities...... 4,035 2 - 4,037 - - - -
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 70,247 $ 255 $ 44 $ 70,458 $ 25,794 $ 63 $ 25 $ 25,832
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
Page 24
<PAGE>
The Company's present strategy is to stagger the maturities of its
investment securities to meet overall liquidity requirements of the Company.
Table 10 below sets forth information concerning the maturity of and weighted
average yield of the Company's investment securities at December 31, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 10
MATURITIES OF AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE YIELDS ON
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
AFTER ONE BUT AFTER FIVE BUT
WITHIN ONE YEAR WITHIN FIVE YEARS WITHIN TEN YEARS
-------------------- -------------------- ---------------------
AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S Treasury...................... $ 1,008 5.85% $ - - $ - -
FHLMC/FNMA-issued mortgage
pass-through certificates....... 406 6.34% 146 5.81% 2,033 6.52%
CMO's and REMIC's issued by
U.S. government-sponsored
agencies........................ - - - - -
Privately issued corporate bonds,
CMO's and REMIC's securities.... - - 2,037 5.41% - -
--------- --------- ----------
$ 1,414 5.99% $ 2,183 5.44% $ 2,033 6.52%
--------- --------- ----------
--------- --------- ----------
Amortized Cost $ 1,409 $ 2,182 $ 2,012
--------- --------- ----------
--------- --------- ----------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AFTER TEN YEARS
---------------------
AMOUNT YIELD TOTAL YIELD
--------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S Treasury...................... $ - - $ 1,008 5.85%
FHLMC/FNMA-issued mortgage
pass-through certificates....... 14,445 6.45% 17,030 6.45%
CMO's and REMIC's issued by
U.S. government-sponsored
agencies........................ 48,383 6.42% 48,383 6.42%
Privately issued corporate bonds,
CMO's and REMIC's securities.... 2,000 6.00% 4,037 5.70%
--------- ---------
$ 64,828 6.41% $ 70,458 6.38%
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
Amortized Cost $ 64,644 $ 70,247
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities to the extent that
borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
repayment penalties.
LENDING ACTIVITIES
The Company's present lending strategy is to target small to mid-sized
privately held businesses located within a eighteen mile radius of its
Century City office which desire a full-range of banking services and
products and highly personalized service. This strategy has resulted in
attracting customers in market niches including entertainment companies,
business managers and others associated with the entertainment industry and
legal, accounting, insurance, advertising and other professional firms. The
Company offers a variety of types of loans, including secured and unsecured
revolving lines of credit, term loans and consumer and home equity loans,
which are tailored to meet the demands of its market niches. In order to
provide the personalized service required by the customers, the Company uses
a team approach to customer service combining an experienced relationship
management officer with operations support personnel.
Page 25
<PAGE>
LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following table sets forth the composition of the Company's loan
portfolio at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 11
LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Commercial loans:
Secured by one to four family
residential properties......... $ 5,005 9% $ 6,545 11% $ 6,233 10%
Secured by multifamily
residential properties......... 3,111 5 2,494 4 2,879 5
Secured by commercial real
properties..................... 20,839 36 22,324 36 26,629 42
Other - secured and
unsecured...................... 24,337 43 21,264 35 16,508 26
Real estate construction and land
development..................... - 0 3,148 5 3,441 6
Home equity lines of credit....... 271 0 252 0 581 1
Consumer installment and
unsecured loans to individuals.. 3,707 7 5,508 9 6,545 10
----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------
Total loans outstanding 57,270 100% 61,535 100% 62,816 100%
------------ ----------- ------------
------------ ----------- ------------
Deferred net loan origination
fees and purchased loan discount (298) (283) (269)
----------- ----------- ------------
Loans receivable, net............. $ 56,972 $ 61,252 $ 62,547
----------- ----------- ------------
----------- ----------- ------------
</TABLE>
Most of the Company's commercial loans are generally within $100,000 to
$2.1 million and its consumer and home equity loans generally are less than
$100,000. The Company may not make any loan in excess of its loan to one
borrower limit under applicable regulations ($2.3 million at December 31, 1998).
If a borrower requests a loan in excess of that amount the Company may originate
the loan with the participation of one or more other lenders.
COMMERCIAL LOANS. The Company offers adjustable and fixed rate secured
and unsecured commercial loans for working capital, the purchase of assets and
other business purposes. The Company underwrites these loans primarily on the
basis that borrower's cash flow and the ability to service the debt without
reliance on the liquidation of the underlying collateral
Collateral for commercial loans may include commercial or residential
real property, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, marketable securities
or other assets. Real estate secured loans generally have terms ranging from
five to ten years and payments based on a 15 to 25 year amortization schedule.
Real estate secured loans frequently have a maturity date shorted than the final
amortization period. The original principal amount of a real estate secured loan
generally does not exceed 65% to 75% of the appraised value of the property (or
the lesser of the appraised value or the purchase price for the property if the
loan is made to finance the purchase of the property).
Page 26
<PAGE>
Unsecured commercial loans include short-term term loans and lines of
credit. The Company's underwriting guidelines for these loans require that
generally the borrower must have low levels of existing debt, working capital
sufficient to cover the loan and a history of earnings and cash flow. Typically,
unsecured lines of credit must be unused for a continuous 30-day period within
each year to demonstrate the borrower's ability to have sufficient funds to
operate without the credit line.
REAL ESTATE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT LOANS. Real estate
construction and land development loans are short-term secured loans made to
finance the construction of commercial and single-family residential properties
or to improve for raw land. Over the past several years, the Company has
de-emphasized its focus on this type of lending to emphasize
relationship-oriented commercial.
CONSUMER LOANS AND HOME EQUITY LINES OF CREDIT. The Company offers
consumer loans and home equity lines of credit principally as accommodation to
individuals associated with the Company's business borrowers. Home equity lines
of credit provide the borrower with a line of credit in an amount which
generally does not exceed 80% of the appraised value of the borrower's residence
net of senior mortgages. Consumer loans are primarily adjustable rate open-ended
unsecured loans (such as credit card loans) but also include fixed rate term
loans (generally under five years) to purchase personal property which are
secured by that personal property. These loans (other than purchase money loans)
generally provide for monthly payments of interest and a portion of the
outstanding principal balance.
Page 27
<PAGE>
LOAN CONCENTRATIONS
The Company is a provider of banking services to the entertainment
industry in Southern California. Table 12 below presents information about
the Company's loans outstanding to entertainment-related customers at
December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 12
INDUSTRY CONCENTRATIONS OF LOANS
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------- ------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Entertainment industry-related loans (1):
Loans for single productions of motion picture and television
feature films.......................................................... $ 1,418 $ 2,221 $ -
Other loans to entertainment-related enterprises, such as television,
music, film and talent agencies........................................ 7,269 1,068 1,158
Loans to individuals involved primarily in the entertainment industry..... 3,368 1,487 2,516
Loans to business management, legal and accounting firms, including their
principals and employees, serving primarily the
entertainmemt industry................................................. 64 1,479 2,791
----------- ---------- -------------
Total entertainment industry-related loans................................ $ 12,119 $ 6,255 $ 6,465
----------- ---------- -------------
----------- ---------- -------------
Percent of total loans outstanding........................................ 21.2% 10.2% 10.3%
</TABLE>
----------
(1)Included are loans secured by liens on residential and commercial real
property amounting to $1.4 million at December 31, 1998 and $3.0 million
at December 31, 1996.
The concentration of loans to the entertainment-related industry at
December 31, 1998, increased to $12.1 million or 21.2% of the total portfolio,
as compared to $6.3 million, or 10.2% at December 31, 1997 and $6.5 million or
10.3% at December 31, 1996. The increase during 1998 was the direct result of
management plans to expand the entertainment division following the growth of
production staff in this area.
Management believes that the varying nature of customers represented within
this group, as set forth in Table 12, indicates reasonable diversification,
although significant increases occurred during 1998 with respect to loans to
entertainment related enterprises, such as television, music, film and talent
agencies. Single customer concentration risk is evident by the existence of six
borrowers with individual loan balances greater than $750,000, aggregating $7.2
million or 59.5% of entertainment industry loans. Management believes its
underwriting standards, collateral and guarantees supporting such borrowings are
sufficient to mitigate the risk of credit concentration. In addition, loans for
the production of independently produced motion picture and television feature
films presented in Table 12, are generally supported during production by
performance bonds from highly-rated insurers, as well as, either distribution
commitments from major studios or, in the case of smaller studios, standby
letters of credit from large commercial banks.
LOAN RATE COMPOSITION AND MATURITIES
Of the Company's total loans, 62.6%, 66.3% and 74.3% had adjustable rates
at December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Adjustable rate loans have
interest rates tied to the prime rate and generally adjust with changes in the
rate on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Of the Company's total loans at December 31, 1998, 45.4% were due in one
year or less, 35.1% were due in 1--5 years and 19.5% were due after 5 years.
The loan maturities shown in Table 13 below are based on contractual
maturities. As is customary in the banking industry, loans can be renewed by
mutual agreement between the Company and the borrower. Because the Company is
unable to estimate the extent to which its borrowers will renew their loans,
the table is based on contractual maturities.
Page 28
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 13
LOAN MATURITIES
DECEMBER 31, 1998
-----------------------------------------------
ADJUSTABLE FIXED
INTEREST RATES INTEREST RATES TOTAL
--------------- --------------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Aggregate maturities of total loans outstanding:
Commercial secured by real estate
In one year or less................................... $ 4,684 $ 70 $ 4,755
After one year but within five years.................. 4,217 10,609 14,826
After five years...................................... 3,744 5,900 9,644
Commercial other secured and unsecured
In one year or less................................... 15,331 3,322 18,652
After one year but within five years.................. 3,929 453 4,381
After five years...................................... 1,253 50 1,303
Other -
In one year or less................................... 1,798 783 2,581
After one year but within five years.................. 648 233 881
After five years...................................... 246 - 246
--------------- --------------- ------------
Total loans outstanding $ 35,850 $ 21,420 $ 57,270
--------------- --------------- ------------
--------------- --------------- ------------
</TABLE>
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
The Company assesses and manages credit risk on an ongoing basis through
diversification guidelines, lending limits, credit review and approval policies
and internal monitoring. As part of the control process, an independent credit
review firm regularly examines the Company's loan portfolio and other credit
process, the Company's loan portfolio and other related products, including
unused commitments and letters of credit. In addition to this internal credit
process, the Company's loan portfolio is subject to examination by external
regulators in the normal course of business. Underlying trends in the economic
and business cycle will influence credit quality. The Company seeks to manage
and control its risk through diversification of the portfolio by type of loan,
industry concentration and type of borrower.
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and other real estate
owned. Nonperforming loans are (i) loans which have been placed on nonaccrual
status, (ii) troubled debt restructurings ("TDR's"), or (iii) loans which are
contractually past due ninety days with respect to principal or interest, and
have not been restructured or placed on nonaccrual status, as described below.
Other real estate owned consists of real properties securing loans of which the
Company has taken title in partial or complete satisfaction of the loan.
Information about nonperforming assets is presented in Table 14.
Page 29
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 14
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Nonaccrual loans....................................... 1,505 $ 1,201 $ 928 $ 573 $ 3,426
Troubled debt restructurings........................... - 5,422 5,016 5,167 5,582
Loans contractually past due ninety or more days
with respect to either principal or interest and
still accruing interest............................. - - 300 221 1,507
-------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Nonperforming loans.................................... 1,505 6,623 6,244 5,961 10,515
Other real estate owned................................ 593 777 556 581 1,529
-------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Total nonperforming assets............................. 2,098 $ 7,400 $ 6,800 $ 6,542 $ 12,044
-------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
-------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
Allowance for credit losses as a percent of nonaccrual
loans............................................... 142.5% 168.4% 319.9% 664.0% 89.4%
Allowance for credit losses as a percent of
nonperforming loans................................. 142.5% 30.5% 47.5% 63.8% 29.1%
Total nonperforming assets as a percent of loans
receivable.......................................... 3.7% 12.1% 10.9% 8.0% 10.4%
Total nonperforming assets as a percent of total
shareholders' equity................................ 15.8% 59.5% 140.4% 108.8% 116.8%
</TABLE>
NONACCRUAL LOANS. Nonaccrual loans are those loans for which management has
discontinued accrual of interest because there exists reasonable doubt as to the
full and timely collection of either principal or interest. It is the Company's
policy that a loan will be placed on nonaccrual status if either principal or
interest payments are past due in excess of ninety days unless the loan is both
well secured and in process of collection, or if full collection of interest or
principal becomes uncertain, regardless of the time period involved.
When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued
but uncollected is reversed against current period operating results. Income on
such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received, and,
where the ultimate collection of the carrying amount of the loan is probable,
after giving consideration to the borrower's current financial condition,
historical repayment performance and other factors. Accrual of interest is
resumed only when (i) principal and interest are brought fully current, and (ii)
such loans are either considered, in management's judgment, to be fully
collectible or otherwise become well secured and in the process of collection.
(See "Net Interest Income" for a discussion of the effects on operating results
of nonperforming loans.)
Nonaccrual loans at December 31, 1998, increased to $1.5 million from $1.2
million at December 31, 1997. Nonaccrual loans at December 31, 1998 were
comprised primarily of entertainment and Small Business Administration ("SBA")
loans, including $579,000 which is guaranteed by the SBA. The additional
interest income that would have been recorded from nonaccrual loans, if the
loans had not been on nonaccrual status, was $162,000, $177,000 and $171,000 for
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Interest payments received on nonaccrual
loans are applied to principal unless there is no doubt as to ultimate full
repayment of principal, in which case, the interest payment is recognized as
interest income. Interest income not recognized on nonaccrual loans reduced the
net yield on earning assets by 13, 17, and 16 basis points for 1998, 1997, and
1996, respectively.
TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS. A TDR is a loan for which the Company has,
for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties,
granted a concession to the borrower it would not otherwise consider, including
modifications of loan terms to alleviate the burden of the borrower's near-term
cash flow requirements in order to help the borrower to improve its financial
condition and eventual ability to repay the loan. At December 31, 1998, the
Company had no TDR's. The TDR at December 31, 1997 was a single loan which was
repaid in full in 1998.
Page 30
<PAGE>
LOANS CONTRACTUALLY PAST DUE 90 OR MORE DAYS. Loans contractually past due
90 or more days are those loans which have become contractually past due at
least ninety days with respect to principal or interest. Interest accruals may
be continued for loans that have become contractually past due ninety days when
such loans are well secured and in the process of collection and, accordingly,
management has determined such loans to be fully collectible as to both
principal and interest.
For this purpose, loans are considered well secured if the collateral has a
realizable value in excess of the amount of principal and accrued interest
outstanding and/or are guaranteed by a financially capable party. Loans are
considered to be in the process of collection if collection of the loan is
proceeding in due course either through legal action or through other collection
efforts which management reasonably expects to result in repayment of the loan
or its restoration to a current status in the near future.
There were no loans contractually past due 90 or more days and still
accruing interest at December 31, 1998 and 1997.
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED. The Company carries OREO at the lesser of the
Bank's recorded investment or the fair value less selling costs. The Company
periodically revalues OREO properties and charges other expenses for any
further write-downs. OREO at December 31, 1998 consisted of three properties
including three undeveloped commercially zoned parcels, one underdeveloped
multi-family zoned parcel and one developed commercial retail property. The
value of the developed commercial retail property is supported by a guarantee
from the SBA. While the Company is currently marketing the remaining
properties for sale, no assurances can be given that they will be sold at the
carrying value.
IMPAIRED LOANS
Due to the size and nature of the Bank's loan portfolio, impaired loans are
determined by a periodic evaluation on an individual loan basis. At December 31,
1998, the Bank had classified $1.5 million of its loans as impaired for which
the related specific reserves was $67,000. The average recorded investment in,
and the amount of interest income recognized on those impaired loans during the
year ended December 31, 1998, were $6.5 million and $542,000 respectively. Due
to the size and nature of the Bank's loan portfolio, impaired loans are
determined based on a periodic evaluation on an individual loan basis.
Foregone interest income attributable to nonperforming loans amounted to
$162,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998 and $177,000 for the same period
in 1997. This resulted in a reduction in yield on average loans receivable of 27
basis points and 30 basis points for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997,
respectively.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The Company has a process by which it reviews and manages the credit
quality of the loan portfolio. This process includes a risk rating system,
uniform underwriting criteria, early identification of problem credits, regular
monitoring of any classified assets graded as "criticized" by the Company's
internal grading system, and an independent loan review process. The loan
approval process is also tied to the risk rating system. The Classified Asset
Committee ("CAC") meets on a quarterly basis to review, monitor, take corrective
action upon all criticized assets, and review the adequacy of the allowance for
credit losses. The CAC is currently chaired by the CEO, with the results of the
CAC's meetings reviewed by the Officers and Directors' Loan Committee quarterly.
The calculation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is
based on a variety of factors, including loan classifications, migration
trends and underlying cash flow and collateral values. On a periodic basis
(three times per year), management engages an outside loan review firm to
review the Company's loan portfolio, risk grade accuracy and the
reasonableness of loan evaluations. Annually, this outside loan review team
analyzes the Company's methodology for calculating the allowance for credit
losses based on the Company's loss histories and policies. The Company uses a
migration analysis as part of its allowance for credit losses evaluation
which is a method by which specific charge-offs are related to the prior life
of the same loan compared to the total loan pools in which the loan was
graded. This method allows for management to use historical trends that are
relative to the Company's portfolio rather than use outside factors that may
not take into consideration trends relative to the
Page 31
<PAGE>
specific loan portfolio. In addition, this analysis takes into consideration
other trends that are qualitative relative to the Company's marketplace,
demographic trends, amount and trends in nonperforming assets and
concentration factors.
The Board of Directors reviews the adequacy of the allowance for credit
losses on a quarterly basis. Management utilizes its judgment to determine the
provision for credit losses and establish the allowance for credit losses.
Management believes based on information known to management that the allowance
for credit losses at December 31, 1998 was adequate to absorb estimated losses
in the existing loan portfolio. However, credit quality is affected by many
factors beyond the control of the Company, including local and national
economies, and facts may exist which are not known to the Company which
adversely affect the likelihood of repayment of various loans in the loan
portfolio and realization of collateral upon a default. Accordingly, no
assurance can be given that the Company will not sustain loan losses materially
in excess of the allowance for credit losses. In addition, the OCC, as an
integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for
credit losses and could require additional provisions for credit losses.
Table 15 presents, for the five-year period ended December 31, 1998, the
composition of the Company's allocation of the allowance for credit losses to
specific loan categories designated by management for this purpose. The
Company's current practice is to make specific allocations of the allowance for
credit losses to criticized and classified loans, and unspecified allocations to
each loan category based on management's risk assessment. This allocation should
not be interpreted as an indication that loan charge-offs will occur in the
future in these amounts or proportions, or as an indication of future charge-off
trends. In addition, the portion of the allowance allocated to each loan
category does not represent the total amount available for future losses that
may occur within such categories, since the total allowance is applicable to the
entire portfolio.
The following table provides an analysis of changes in the allowance for
credit losses during the period indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 15
ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------
1998 %(1) 1997 %(1) 1996 %(1)
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses:
Commercial loans:
Secured by one to four family residential properties....... $ 132 9% $ 154 11% $ 479 10%
Secured by multifamily residential properties.............. 73 5 49 4 41 5
Secured by commercial real properties...................... 590 36 512 36 590 42
Other - secured and unsecured.............................. 1,061 43 1,056 35 1,643 26
Real estate construction and land development............... - - 63 5 42 6
Home equity lines of credit................................. 4 0 2 0 13 1
Consumer installment and unsecured loans to individuals (1). 284 7 187 9 161 10
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------
Allowance allocable to loans receivable.................... $ 2,144 100% $ 2,023 100% $ 2,969 100%
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------
1995 %(1) 1994 %(1)
-------- ------ ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses:
Commercial loans:
Secured by one to four family residential properties.......$ 205 12% $ 77 16%
Secured by multifamily residential properties.............. 25 3 51 2
Secured by commercial real properties...................... 454 35 674 28
Other - secured and unsecured.............................. 2,523 33 1,648 37
Real estate construction and land development............... 11 5 17 1
Home equity lines of credit................................. 64 5 18 2
Consumer installment and unsecured loans to individuals (1). 523 7 578 14
-------- ------ ------- ------
Allowance allocable to loans receivable.................... 3,805 100% $3,063 100%
$-------- ------ ------- ------
-------- ------ ------- ------
</TABLE>
---------
(1) Percentage of loans in each category to total loans.
Page 32
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 16
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of period 2,023 $ 2,969 $ 3,805 $ 3,063 $ 6,697
Loan charged off:
Real estate construction and land development.............. - - - - 45
Commercial loans:
Secured by one to four family residential properties..... 4 310 9 120 2,215
Secured by multifamily residential properties............ - 256 - - 702
Secured by commercial real properties.................... 31 56 - - 1,407
Other - secured and unsecured............................ 176 350 1,183 1,913 6,781
Home equity lines of credit................................ - - - - 257
Consumer installment and unsecured loans to individuals (1) 196 343 108 599 2,810
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total loan charge-offs..................................... 407 1,315 1,300 2,632 14,217
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Real estate construction and land development.............. - - - 200 -
Commercial loans:
Secured by one to four family residential properties..... 1 71 26 11 288
Secured by multifamily residential properties............ 10 - - - -
Secured by commercial real properties.................... - 4 - - -
Other - secured and unsecured............................ 216 202 398 588 2,205
Home equity lines of credit................................ - - - - 38
Consumer installment and unsecured loans to individuals (1) 301 92 40 268 722
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Total recoveries of loans previously charged off........... 528 369 464 1,067 3,253
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Net (recoveries) charge-offs............................... (121) 946 836 1,565 10,964
Provision for credit losses................................ - - - 2,307 7,330
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Balance, end of period..................................... 2,144 $ 2,023 $ 2,969 $ 3,805 $ 3,063
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs as a percentage of
allowance for credit losses.............................. -5.66% 46.76% 28.16% 41.13% 357.95%
Provision for credit losses as a percentage of net loan
charge-offs during period................................ - - - 147.41% 66.86%
Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs as a percentage of
average gross loans outstanding during the period........ -0.20% 1.59% 1.19% 1.63% 7.83%
Recoveries of loans previously charged off as a percentage
of loans charged off in the previous year................ 40.16% 28.38% 17.60% 7.50% 133.60%
</TABLE>
OFF-BALANCE SHEET CREDIT COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT OBLIGATIONS
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
credit risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its
clients. In addition to undisbursed commitments to extend credit under loan
facilities, these instruments include conditional obligations under standby and
commercial letters of credit. The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event
of nonperformance by customers is represented by the contractual amount of the
instruments.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company
to secure the financial performance of a client to a third party and are
primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk
involved in issuing a letter of credit for a borrower is essentially the same as
that involved in extending loan facilities to the borrower. The Company uses the
same credit underwriting policies in accepting such
Page 33
<PAGE>
contingent obligations as it does for loan facilities. When deemed necessary,
the Company holds appropriate collateral supporting those commitments. The
nature of collateral obtained varies and may include deposits held in
financial institutions and real properties.
At December 31, 1998 and 1997, standby letters of credit amounted to
$652,000 and $600,000, respectively, and there were no commercial letters of
credit outstanding.
Undisbursed commitments under revocable and irrevocable loan facilities
amounted to $11.6 million and $9.4 million at December 31, 1998 and 1997,
respectively. Many of these commitments are expected to expire without being
drawn upon and, as such, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements.
Page 34
<PAGE>
DEPOSITS
As indicated in Table 17, the Bank experienced a 13.4% increase in average
total deposits during 1998 compared to 1997. This increase in deposits occurred
primarily as a result of growth in real estate title and escrow deposits of $5.8
million and growth in money market deposits of $7.3 million, offset by a planned
decline in higher cost money desk deposits of $4.1 million.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 17
DEPOSIT COMPOSITION
(BALANCES ARE AVERAGES)
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1998 1997
--------------------- ---------------------
AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Noninterest-bearing demand
deposits:
Real estate title and escrow
company customers................ $ 15,546 14% $ 9,764 10%
Other noninterest-bearing
demand........................... 25,564 24 23,224 24
Interest-bearing demand, money
market and savings................ 35,343 32 28,598 30
Time certificates of deposit:
Money Desk........................ 19,718 18 23,789 25
Other:
$100,000 or more................. 7,809 7 5,320 5
Under $100,000................... 5,413 5 5,750 6
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total time certificates of deposit 32,940 30 34,859 36
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Total Deposits $ 109,393 100% $ 96,445 100%
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
</TABLE>
Page 35
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 18
MATURITIES OF TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
$100,000 OR MORE
DECEMBER 31, 1998
----------------------------------------------
MONEY ALL
DESK OTHER TOTAL
--------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Aggregate maturities of time certificates of deposit:
In three months or less.................................. $ - $ 6,025 $ 6,025
After three months but within six months................. - 2,355 2,355
After six months but within twelve months................ 501 837 1,338
After twelve months...................................... 5,148 100 5,248
--------- --------- ---------
Total time certificates of deposit $100,000 or more $ 5,649 $ 9,317 $ 14,966
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1997
----------------------------------------------
MONEY ALL
DESK OTHER TOTAL
--------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Aggregate maturities of time certificates of deposit:
In three months or less.................................. $ 108 $ 4,472 $ 4,580
After three months but within six months................. - 746 746
After six months but within twelve months................ 805 822 1,627
After twelve months...................................... 5,449 - 5,449
--------- --------- ---------
Total time certificates of deposit $100,000 or more $ 6,362 $ 6,040 $ 12,402
--------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
BORROWINGS
Borrowings and related weighted average rates are summarized below in
Table 19.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TABLE 19
BORROWINGS
1998 1997
------------------------------------ -------------------------------------
BALANCES AT AVERAGE AVERAGE BALANCES AT AVERAGE AVERAGE
YEAR-END BALANCE RATE YEAR-END BALANCE RATE
----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Federal funds purchased
and securities sold under
repurchase agreements......... $ 1,000 $ 2,279 5.92% $ 5,050 $ 1,637 5.68%
Other borrowings................. 19,300 9,276 5.57% 3,500 143 4.89%
1996
------------------------------------
BALANCES AT AVERAGE AVERAGE
YEAR-END BALANCE RATE
---------- ---------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<C> <C> <C>
Federal funds purchased
and securities sold under
repurchase agreements......... - $ 1,140 2.19%
Other borrowings................. - - -
</TABLE>
The maximum amount of securities sold with agreements to repurchase at any
month end was $4.0 million, $5.0 million and $1.5 million during 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
The maximum amount of other borrowings at any month end was $19.3 million
during 1998 and $3.5 million during 1997. The Bank did not utilize other
borrowings during 1996.
At December 31, 1998, $5.8 million of borrowed funds were scheduled to
mature during 1999, $6.5 million were scheduled to mature during 2000 and $8.0
million were scheduled to mature during 2001.
Page 36
<PAGE>
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 1998 and
1997 is presented below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
-------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30 DEC. 31
1998 1998 1998 1998
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income........................................ $ 2,353 $ 2,377 $ 2,578 $ 2,773
Interest expense....................................... 798 803 939 945
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Net interest income.................................. 1,555 1,574 1,639 1,828
Net gain (loss) on sale of securities
available-for-sale.................................... 17 21 1 -
Other operating income................................. 214 194 154 254
Other operating expense................................ (1,591) (1,643) (1,686) (1,878)
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Net income before income taxes......................... 195 146 108 204
Income taxes........................................... - 2 6 -
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Net income............................................. $ 195 $ 144 $ 102 $ 204
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Basic earnings per share............................... $ 0.29 $ 0.21 $ 0.15 $ 0.30
Diluted earnings per share............................. $ 0.08 $ 0.05 $ 0.04 $ 0.08
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
-------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPT. 30 DEC. 31
1997 1997 1997 1997
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income........................................ $ 2,015 $ 1,996 $ 2,228 $ 2,361
Interest expense....................................... 711 654 704 787
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Net interest income.................................. 1,304 1,342 1,524 1,574
Net loss on sale of securities available-for-sale...... - - (12) (25)
Other operating income................................. 118 110 119 176
Other operating expense................................ (1,557) (1,529) (1,537) (1,475)
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) before income taxes.................. (135) (77) 94 250
Income taxes........................................... - - - -
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) ..................................... $ (135)$ (77)$ 94 $ 250
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Basic earnings (loss) per share........................ $ (0.20)$ (0.11)$ 0.14 $ 0.37
Diluted earnings (loss) per share...................... $ (0.20)$ (0.11)$ 0.04 $ 0.10
</TABLE>
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities". This Statement establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. This
Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. The
Company currently does not own any derivative instruments. Therefore, management
does not believe that this statement will have a significant impact on the
Company.
Page 37
<PAGE>
YEAR 2000 MATTERS
THE FOLLOWING CONSTITUTES A "YEAR 2000 READINESS" DISCLOSURE UNDER THE YEAR 2000
INFORMATION AND READINESS DISCLOSURE ACT.
As the Year 2000 approaches, a critical issue has emerged regarding how
existing application software programs and operating systems can accommodate
this date value. In brief, many existing application software products were
designed to only accommodate a two-digit date position, which represents the
year (e.g., `95' is stored on the system and represents the year 1995). As a
result, the year 1999 (i.e., '99') could be the maximum date value these systems
will be able to accurately process. Resolution of the Year 2000 problem is among
the Company's highest priorities, and a comprehensive program has been
established to address its many aspects. The Company's Year 2000 program is
comprised of numerous individual projects which address the following broad
areas: data processing systems, telecommunications and data networks, physical
facilities and security systems, vendor risk, customer risk, liquidity risk,
contingency planning, testing and communications. The goal of the Company's Year
2000 program is to assure that it will be able to conduct normal business
before, during and after the century date change.
During 1997, the Company established a Year 2000 team, consisting of the
senior managers from each operational area of the Company. The team first
evaluated the overall issue and identified risks posed by the century date
change and established a plan to address these risks. Pursuant to the plan, the
following steps were taken:
- Assessment - Systems have been inventoried, evaluated and prioritized
in importance to client service operations.
- Renovation - The Company determined that internal systems did not
require renovation. The plans of vendors are being monitored to assure
that their system changes are completed within acceptable timeframes.
- Validation - The testing and validation phase has commenced. Each
critical system provided by external vendors will be tested to ensure
processing and reporting accuracy. The plan calls for completion of
all testing and validation of mission critical systems by June 30,
1999.
The Company is attempting to obtain certification of Year 2000 compliance
from 19 external service bureau or software providers, of which four have
been assessed as mission critical. At December 31, 1998, nine, or 47%, of
these 19 service providers (including one mission critical provider)
certified Year 2000 compliance.
The Company is attempting to obtain certification of Year 2000
compliance from 43 vendors or suppliers, of which two have been assessed as
mission critical. As of December 31, 1998, 29, or 68%, of these 43 vendors or
suppliers certified Year 2000 compliance. None of these 29 are mission
critical.
The Company's approach to evaluating potential Year 2000 issues
pertaining to its borrowers was first to determine the level of loans
dependent on borrower cash flow versus collateral such as real estate, and
second, to make an assessment of loans, over a certain dollar volume, which
may have exposure to Year 2000 issues. The Company has determined that
approximately 43% of the dollar volume of its loan portfolio are not
collateralized by real estate, and further determined it is not aware of any
pending issues that would cause the Company not to extend credit to these
"cash flow dependent" borrowers. The Company specifically reviewed
approximately 80% of the dollar volume of its loan portfolio to assess the
potential Year 2000 issues by first, determining whether the borrower was
exposed to Year 2000 date changes (e.g. individual versus commercial) and
second, completing an assessment of those borrowers it determined may have
potential exposure to Year 2000 issues. Based on this assessment the Company
is not aware of any pending issues that would cause it not to extend credit
to these borrowers. However, the Company's credit risk associated with loans
may increase as reliance on third party responses is subject to both the
borrower's understanding of the potential Year 2000 issues and the borrowers
determination of the impact on their ability to fulfill contractual loan
obligations. As a result, there may be increases in the Company's problem
loans and credit losses in future years. Although it is not possible to
quantify the complete potential impact of such losses at this time,
management has no current information which would lead it to believe that
these potential losses would be material.
Page 38
<PAGE>
The financial impact of making the required systems testing and
enhancement described above is expected to be approximately $100,000, of
which approximately 50% represent capital expenditures. Approximately $28,000
has been expended as of December 31, 1998.
The Company is developing contingency plans for implementation in the event
that mission critical service bureaus, software providers, vendors, suppliers or
other significant third parties fail to adequately address Year 2000 issues.
Such plans principally involve identifying alternate sources. The Company is
also enhancing its existing business resumption plans to reflect Year 2000
issues and is developing plans designed to coordinate the efforts of its
personnel and resources in addressing Year 2000 problems that become evident
after December 31, 1999. There can be no assurance that any such plans will
fully mitigate any such failures or problems. Furthermore, there may be certain
mission critical third parties, such as utilities or telecommunication
companies, where alternative arrangements or sources are limited or unavailable.
If Year 2000 issues are not adequately addressed by the Company and third
parties, the Company's business, results of operations and financial position
could be materially adversely affected.
The foregoing Year 2000 discussion contains "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
statements, including without limitation, anticipated costs, the dates by which
the Company expects to substantially complete programming changes, remediation
and testing of systems and the impact of the redeployment of existing staff, are
based on management's best current estimates, which were derived utilizing
numerous assumptions about future events, including continued availability of
certain resources, representations received from third party service providers
and other factors. However, there can be no guarantee that these estimates will
be achieved, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated.
Specific factors that might cause such material differences include, but are not
limited to, the availability and cost of personnel trained in this area, the
ability to identify and convert all relevant computer systems, results of Year
2000 testing, adequate resolution of Year 2000 issues by governmental agencies,
business or other third parties who are service providers, suppliers, borrowers
or customers of the Company, unanticipated system costs, the need to replace
hardware, the adequacy of and ability to implement contingency plans and similar
uncertainties. The forward-looking statements made in the foregoing Year 2000
discussion speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and the
Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made
or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Page 39
<PAGE>
FACTORS WHICH MAY AFFECT FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
The Company's results of operations and financial condition are affected by
many factors, including the following.
CHANGING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
The Company's results of operation and financial condition are strongly
influenced by economic conditions in its market area (principally the Los
Angeles metropolitan area) as well as regional and national economic conditions
and in its niche markets, including the entertainment industry in Southern
California. During the past several years economic conditions in these areas
have been favorable. A deterioration in these economic conditions could affect
the financial condition and cash flows of its borrowers, which could lead to
higher levels of loan defaults, a decline in the value of collateral for the
loans. In addition, an unfavorable economy could reduce the demand for the
Company's loans and other products and services.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company's operating results depend to a large extent on its net
interest income. Changes in market interest rates can affect the Company's net
interest income by affecting the spread between its interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. This may be due to the different maturities of its
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as an increase
in the general level of interest rates. Changes in market interest rates also
affect, among other things:
- The Company's ability to originate loans;
- The ability of borrowers to make payments on loans;
- The value of its interest-earning assets and its ability to realize
gains from the sale of these assets;
- The average life of its interest-earning assets; and
- The Company's ability to obtain deposits instead of other available
investment alternatives.
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental
monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions
and other factors beyond its control.
RISK OF DECLINES IN ASSET QUALITY
The Company's results of operations depend significantly on the quality of
its assets. While the Company has developed and implemented underwriting
policies and procedures in connection with the making of loans, compliance with
these policies and procedures in making loans does not guarantee repayment of
the loans. High levels of non-performing assets will adversely affect the
Company's results of operations and financial condition. A borrower's ability to
pay its loan in accordance with its terms can be adversely affected by a number
of factors, such as a decrease in the borrower's revenues and cash flows due to
adverse changes in economic conditions or a decline in the demand for the
borrower's products and/or services. The Company has devoted and continues to
devote substantial time and resources to the identification, collection and
workout of non-performing assets, which has resulted in a significant decrease
in its nonperforming assets from $12.4 million, or 5.2%, of total assets at
December 31, 1994 to $2.1 million, or 1.5%, of total assets at December 31,
1998. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not have material
additional non-performing assets in the future.
Page 40
<PAGE>
ADEQUACY OF ALLOWANCES FOR LOSSES
The Company establishes allowances for credit losses against each segment
of its loan portfolio. At December 31, 1998, its allowance for credit losses
equaled 3.8% of total loans and 142.5% of nonperforming loans. Although the
Company believes that it had established adequate allowances for credit losses
as of December 31, 1998, credit quality is affected by many factors beyond the
control of the Company, including local and national economies, and facts may
exist which are not known to the Company which adversely affect the likelihood
of repayment of various loans in the loan portfolio and realization of the
collateral upon a default. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the
Company will not sustain loan losses materially in excess of the allowance for
credit losses. In addition, the OCC, as an integral part of its examination
process, periodically reviews its allowance for credit losses and could require
additional provisions for credit losses. Material future additions to the
allowance for loan losses may also be necessary due to increases in the size of
the loan portfolio. Increases in the provisions for credit losses would
adversely affect its results of operations.
COMPETITION
The banking business is highly competitive. The Company's primary service
area is dominated by a relatively small number of major banks which have many
offices over a wide geographic area and much greater name recognition.
Increasing competition in the markets for the Company's products and services
can reduce the demand for the Company's products and services and require the
Company to originate those products and services on less favorable terms.
REGULATION
Both the Company, as a bank holding company, and the Bank, as a national
bank, are subject to significant governmental supervision and regulation, which
is intended primarily for the protection of depositors. Statutes and regulations
affecting it may be changed at any time, and the interpretation of these
statutes and regulations by examining authorities also may change. The Company
cannot assure you that future changes in applicable statutes and regulations or
in its interpretation will not adversely affect its business.
Page 41
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The consolidated financial statements required by this Item are included
herewith as a separate section of this Report, commencing on page F-1. The
supplementary data pursuant to Item 8 is included in "Note 18--Quarterly
Financial Data (unaudited)"--of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements" on page F-28.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
NOT APPLICABLE.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this item will appear under the "Election of
Directors," "Directors and Executive Officers," and "Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company's proxy statement for the 1999
Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "1999 Proxy Statement"), and such
information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference to
that portion of the 1998 Proxy Statement, if filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the
end of the Company's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an
amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-KSB.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item will appear under the captions
"Directors and Executive Officers--Compensation of Directors," "Directors and
Executive Officers--Executive Compensation," "Report of the Compensation
Committee on Executive Compensation", "Directors and Executive Officers--Stock
Option Grants," "Directors and Executive Officers--Option Exercises and
Holdings," "Directors and Executive Officers--Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation." and "Performance Graph" in the 1998 Proxy Statement,
and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by
reference to those portions of the 1998 Proxy Statement, if filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120
days after the end of the Company's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii)
included in amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-KSB.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this item will appear under the captions
"Outstanding Securities and Voting Rights" and "Security Ownership of Principal
Shareholders and Management" in the 1998 Proxy Statement, and such information
either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference to that
portion of the 1998 Proxy Statement, if filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of
the Company's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an
amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-KSB.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item will appear under the caption
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the 1998 Proxy Statement,
and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by
reference to that portion of the 1998 Proxy Statement, if filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120
days after the end of the Company's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii)
included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form
10-KSB.
Page 42
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents have been filed as part of this report:
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Reports of Independent Public Accountants ........................................................ 46
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1998 and 1997 ........................................ 47
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996 ...... 48
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 .......................................................................... 49
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 ....... 50
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the three years ended December 31, 1998 ........... 51
</TABLE>
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
None.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Filed November 6, 1998 relating to Item 9
(c) Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on page E-1 of this Report on Form 10-KSB
(d) See Item 14(a) above.
Page 43
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP
(Registrant)
By /s/ SCOTT A. MONTGOMERY
-------------------------------------
Scott A. Montgomery
Chief Executive Officer
By /s/ JOSEPH W. KILEY III
-------------------------------------
Joseph W. Kiley III
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 24, 1999
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ ROBERT E. GIPSON
- -----------------------------------------
Robert E. Gipson Chairman of the Board March 24, 1999
/s/ ROBERT E. THOMSON
- -----------------------------------------
Robert E. Thomson Vice Chair March 24, 1999
/s/ DONALD E. BENSON
- -----------------------------------------
Donald E. Benson Director March 24, 1999
/s/ JOSEPH N. COHEN
- -----------------------------------------
Joseph N. Cohen Director March 24, 1999
/s/ ALAN GRAHM
- -----------------------------------------
Alan Grahm Director March 24, 1999
/s/ ANTOINETTE HUBENETTE, M.D.
- -----------------------------------------
Antoinette Hubenette, M.D. Director March 24, 1999
/s/ JOSEPH W. KILEY III
- -----------------------------------------
Joseph W. Kiley III Director and Chief March 24, 1999
Financial Officer
/s/ SCOTT A. MONTGOMERY
- -----------------------------------------
Scott A. Montgomery Director and Chief March 24, 1999
Page 44
<PAGE>
Executive Officer
/s/ DION G. MORROW
- -----------------------------------------
Dion G. Morrow Director March 24, 1999
/s/ CARL R. TERZIAN
- -----------------------------------------
Carl R. Terzian Director March 24, 1999
</TABLE>
Page 45
<PAGE>
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors
of National Mercantile Bancorp and Subsidiary:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of National
Mercantile Bancorp (a California corporation) and subsidiary (the "Company") as
of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of National Mercantile Bancorp and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1998, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 15, 1999
To the Board of Directors
National Mercantile Bancorp
Los Angeles, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of National
Mercantile Bancorp and subsidiary (the "Company") as of December 31, 1997 and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of National Mercantile Bancorp and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 23, 1998
Page 46
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1998 1997
--------------- ---------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks-demand............................................... $ 5,405 $ 4,186
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreements to resell............................................... 6,800 11,900
--------------- ---------------
Cash and cash equivalents............................................. 12,205 16,086
Interest-bearing deposits with other financial institutions.................. - 250
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value;
aggregate amortized cost of $70,247 and
$25,794 at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively...................... 70,458 25,832
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost;
aggregate market value of $14,010 at
December 31, 1997........................................................ - 14,000
FRB and other stock, at cost................................................. 1,391 646
Loans receivable............................................................. 56,972 61,252
Allowance for credit losses.............................................. (2,144) (2,023)
--------------- ---------------
Net loans receivable.................................................. 54,828 59,229
Premises and equipment, net.................................................. 726 785
Other real estate owned, net................................................. 593 777
Accrued interest receivable and other assets................................. 1,422 1,800
--------------- ---------------
Total assets.......................................................... $ 141,623 $ 119,405
--------------- ---------------
--------------- ---------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand............................................... $ 47,375 $ 35,399
Interest-bearing demand.................................................. 6,835 7,431
Money market............................................................. 21,652 19,646
Savings.................................................................. 2,063 3,524
Time certificates of deposit:
$100,000 or more...................................................... 14,966 12,402
Under $100,000........................................................ 14,081 18,986
--------------- ---------------
Total deposits................................................... 106,972 97,388
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase........................................... 1,000 5,050
Other borrowings............................................................. 19,300 3,500
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities............................... 1,093 1,027
--------------- ---------------
Total liabilities..................................................... 128,365 106,965
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock: (10,000 shares undesignated)
Series A non-cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock;
authorized 990,000 shares; issued and outstanding 900,000 shares...... 7,350 7,350
Common stock, no par value; authorized 10,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding 677,048 shares and 677,144 shares
at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively........................... 24,613 24,613
Accumulated deficit...................................................... (18,916) (19,561)
Accumulated other comprehensive income................................... 211 38
--------------- ---------------
Total shareholders' equity............................................ 13,258 12,440
--------------- ---------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity............................ $ 141,623 $ 119,405
--------------- ---------------
--------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 47
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income: $
Loans, including fees......................................... 5,937 $ 5,947 $ 6,743
Securities held-to-maturity................................... 134 1,194 62
Securities available-for-sale................................. 3,215 746 928
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell........................................ 782 710 1,024
Interest-bearing deposits with other financial institutions... 13 3 -
------------ ------------ ------------
Total interest income...................................... 10,081 8,600 8,757
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand....................................... 95 90 76
Money market and savings...................................... 846 634 634
Time certificates of deposit:
$100,000 or more............................................ 788 464 419
Under $100,000.............................................. 1,104 1,568 1,925
------------ ------------ ------------
Total interest expense on deposits......................... 2,833 2,756 3,054
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements
to repurchase.............................................. 135 93 25
Other borrowings.............................................. 517 7 -
------------ ------------ ------------
Total interest expense..................................... 3,485 2,856 3,079
------------ ------------ ------------
Net interest income before provision for credit losses..... 6,596 5,744 5,678
Provision for credit losses.................................... - - -
------------ ------------ ------------
Net interest income after provision for credit losses......... 6,596 5,744 5,678
Other operating income (losses):
Net gain (loss) on sale of securities available-for-sale...... 39 (37) (3)
International services........................................ 84 128 124
Investment division........................................... 43 18 73
Deposit-related and other customer services................... 621 377 308
Gain on sale of other real estate owned and fixed assets...... 68 - -
------------ ------------ ------------
Total other operating income............................... 855 486 502
Other operating expenses:
Salaries and related benefits................................. 3,168 2,887 2,718
Net occupancy................................................. 903 806 793
Furniture and equipment....................................... 287 200 298
Printing and communications................................... 231 229 211
Insurance and regulatory assessments.......................... 304 516 629
Customer services............................................. 797 537 607
Computer data processing...................................... 264 292 359
Legal settlement.............................................. - - 1,000
Legal services................................................ 146 172 503
Other professional services................................... 300 225 640
Other real estate owned expenses.............................. 141 21 39
Promotion and other expenses.................................. 257 213 206
------------ ------------ ------------
Total other operating expenses............................. 6,798 6,098 8,003
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)....... 653 132 (1,823)
Income tax provision (benefit)................................. $ 8 - (579)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss)............................................. 645 $ 132 $ (1,244)
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
Earnings (loss) per share: $
Basic....................................................... 0.95 $ 0.20 $ (1.84)
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
Diluted..................................................... .0.25 0.08 $ (1.84)
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 48
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACCUMULATED
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK OTHER
-------------------------- --------------------------- ACCUMULATED COMPREHENSIVE
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT DEFICIT INCOME TOTAL
------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- -------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1996.... - $ - 3,078,146 $ 24,614 $ (18,449) $ (154) $ 6,011
Comprehensive income:
Other comprehensive
income:
Unrealized holding gain
during the period...... 75 75
Add: Reclassification
adjustment for losses
included in net income. 3 3
Net loss................... (1,244) (1,244)
-------------
Comprehensive income... (1,166)
------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1996.. - - 3,078,146 24,614 (19,693) (76) 4,845
9.09 to 1 reverse stock
split effective June 20,
1997..................... (2,739,516)
Return of fractional
common shares due to
reverse stock split...... (58) (1) (1)
Issuance of Series A
Noncumulative Convertible
Perpetual Preferred
Stock, $10.00 stated
value, net............... 900,000 7,350 7,350
100 % common stock
dividend declared on
January 8, 1998.......... 338,572
Comprehensive income:
Other comprehensive
income:
Unrealized holding gain
during the period...... 77 77
Add: Reclassification
adjustment for
losses included in
net income......... 37 37
Net income................. 132 132
-------------
Comprehensive income... 246
------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1997.. 900,000 7,350 677,144 24,613 (19,561) 38 12,440
Return of fractional
common shares due to
reverse stock split...... (96) - -
Comprehensive income:
Other comprehensive
income:
Unrealized holding gain
during the period...... 212 212
Less: Reclassification
adjustment for gain
included in net income. (39) (39)
Net income................. 645 645
-------------
Comprehensive income... 818
------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- -------------
Balance at December 31, 1998.. 900,000 $ 7,350 677,048 $ 24,613 $ (18,916) $ 211 $ 13,258
------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- -------------
------------ ------------ ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- -------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 49
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------- ----------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net cash flow from operating activities:
Net income (loss)..................................................... $ 645 $ 132 $ (1,244)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization................................... 248 179 194
Gain on sale of premises and equipment.......................... (9) - -
Gain on sale of other real estate owned......................... (59) - -
Provision for other real estate owned........................... 100 - -
Net (gain) loss on sale of securities available-for-sale........ (39) 37 3
Net amortization (accretion)of premiums (discounts) on
securities.................................................... 94 (28) 57
Net accretion of discounts on loans purchased................... (32) (36) (9)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets... 377 (204) (202)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities. 66 310 (524)
---------- ----------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities................ 1,391 390 (1,725)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net decrease (increase) in interest-bearing deposits with
other financial institutions........................................ 250 (250) -
Purchase of securities held-to-maturity............................... - (6,972) (14,395)
Purchase of securities available-for-sale............................. (71,359) (26,428) (1,000)
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale.................. 6,102 3,836 10,632
Proceeds from repayments and maturities of
securities available-for-sale....................................... 20,004 421 6,568
Proceeds from repayments and maturities of
secutiries-held-to-maturity......................................... 14,000 7,400 -
Loan originations and principal collections, net...................... 4,257 164 18,638
Purchase of other real estate owned................................... - - (43)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned......................... 319 - 62
Net purchases of premises and equipment............................... (179) (21) (10)
---------- ----------- ----------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities................ (26,606) (21,850) 20,452
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in demand deposits, money market and
savings accounts.................................................... 11,925 2,794 (9,938)
Net decrease in time certificates of deposit.......................... (2,341) (9,260) (6,451)
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements
to repurchase and federal funds purchased........................... (4,050) 5,050 (4,497)
Net increase in other borrowings..................................... 15,800 3,500 -
Payment for fractional shares of common stock......................... - (1) -
Net proceeds from issuance of 900,000 shares of preferred stock....... - 7,350 -
---------- ----------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities................ 21,334 9,433 (20,886)
---------- ----------- ----------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents.............................. (3,881) (12,027) (2,159)
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1................................... 16,086 28,113 30,272
---------- ----------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents, December 31................................. $ 12,205 $ 16,086 $ 28,113
---------- ----------- ----------
---------- ----------- ----------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 50
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of National Mercantile Bancorp
(the "Company") and of its wholly owned subsidiary Mercantile National Bank (the
"Bank") conform to generally accepted accounting principles and to prevailing
practices within the banking industry. The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during reported
periods.
The Company, through the Bank, engages in commercial banking in the Los
Angeles area serving niche markets represented by professional, business and
entertainment borrowers, and associated individuals with commercial banking and
personal banking needs.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and the Bank. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The Bank is the Company's only subsidiary.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include
cash and due from banks-demand, federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreements to resell.
SECURITIES
Securities held-to-maturity are carried at cost adjusted for amortization
of premium and accretion of discounts, as the Company has the ability and
management has the intent to hold such securities until maturity. Securities
available-for-sale are carried at estimated fair value. Unrealized gains or
losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported
as accumulated other comprehensive income in a separate component of
shareholders' equity until realized. Because the Company has net operating loss
carryforwards, no tax expense (benefit) has been recorded from unrealized gains
(losses). Premiums or discounts on held-to maturity and available-for-sale
securities are amortized or accreted into income using the effective interest
method. Realized gains or losses on sales of held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale securities are recorded using the specific identification
method.
LOANS
Loans are generally carried at principal amounts outstanding less unearned
income. Unearned income includes deferred unamortized fees net of direct
incremental loan origination costs.
Interest income is accrued as earned. Net deferred fees are accreted into
interest income using the effective interest method. Loans are placed on
nonaccrual status when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to interest or
principal unless the loan is both well secured and in process of collection.
Loans are also placed on nonaccrual status when the full collection of interest
or principal becomes uncertain. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the
accrued and unpaid interest receivable is reversed and the accretion of deferred
loan fees is ceased. Thereafter, interest collected on the loan is accounted for
on the cash collection or cost recovery method until qualifying for return to
accrual status. Generally, a loan may be returned to accrual status when all
delinquent principal and interest are brought current in accordance with the
terms of the loan agreement and certain performance criteria have been met.
Page 51
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
The Company considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that it
will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of
the loan agreement. Once a loan is determined to be impaired, the impairment is
measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted
at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, the
impairment is measured by using the loan's observable market price or the fair
value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
When the measurement of the impaired loan is less than the recorded amount
of the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance with
a corresponding charge to the provision for credit losses or by adjusting an
existing valuation allowance for the impaired loan with a corresponding charge
or credit to the provision for credit losses.
The Company's policy is to record cash receipts received on impaired loans
first as reductions to principal and then to interest income.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The provisions for credit losses charged to operations reflects
management's judgment of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and are
determined through periodic analysis of the loan portfolio, problem loans and
consideration of such other factors as the Bank's loan loss experience, trends
in problem loans, concentrations of credit risk, and current and expected future
economic conditions (particularly Southern California), as well as the results
of the Company's ongoing examination process and that of its regulators.
The calculation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is based
on a variety of factors, including loan classifications, migration trends and
underlying cash flow and collateral values. On a periodic basis (three times per
year), management engages an outside loan review firm to review the Bank's loan
portfolio, risk grade accuracy and the reasonableness of loan evaluations.
Annually, this outside loan review team analyzes the Bank's methodology for
calculating the allowance for credit losses based on the Bank's loss histories
and policies. The Bank uses a migration analysis as part of its allowance for
credit losses evaluation which is a method by which specific charge-offs are
related to the prior life of the same loan compared to the total loan pools in
which the loan was graded. This method allows for management to use historical
trends that are relative to the Bank's portfolio rather than use outside factors
that may not take into consideration trends relative to the specific loan
portfolio. In addition, this analysis takes into consideration other trends that
are qualitative relative to the Bank's marketplace, demographic trends, amount
and trends in nonperforming assets and concentration factors.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Premises and equipment are presented at cost less accumulated amortization
and depreciation. Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment is
determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives (3
years to 5 years) of each type of asset. Leasehold improvements are amortized
using the straight-line method over the term of the related leases or the
service lives (10 years to 20 years) of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Gains and losses on dispositions are reflected in current operations.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to other operating expenses as incurred.
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO") is comprised of real estate acquired in
satisfaction of loans. Properties acquired by foreclosure or deed in lieu of
foreclosure are transferred to OREO and are recorded at fair value less
estimated costs to sell, at the date of transfer of the property. The fair value
of the OREO property is based upon a current appraisal. Losses that result from
the ongoing periodic valuation of these properties are charged against
Page 52
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
other operating expenses in the period in which they are identified. Expenses
for holding costs are changed to other operating expenses as incurred.
INCOME TAXES
The Company and the Bank file consolidated federal income tax return and
combined state income tax returns.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future
tax consequences of existing differences between financial reporting and tax
reporting basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating losses and
tax credit carryforwards, using enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets
will be reduced through a valuation allowance whenever it becomes more likely
than not that all, or some portion will not be realized. Deferred income taxes
(benefit) represents the net change in deferred tax asset or liability balance
during the year. This amount, together with income taxes currently payable or
refundable in the current year, represents the total tax expense (benefit) for
the year.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
In September 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 130, "Reporting
Comprehensive Income" ("SFAS 130"). SFAS 130 establishes standards for the
reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set
of general purpose financial statements. All items that are required to be
recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income are
to be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same
prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined as
change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and
circumstances from nonowner sources. The accumulated balance of other
comprehensive income is not required to be displayed separately from retained
earnings and additional capital paid in the consolidated balance sheet. SFAS No.
130 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997.
The components of other comprehensive income together with total
comprehensive income are reported in the consolidated statement of changes in
shareholders' equity. The accumulated balance of other comprehensive income is
not reported as a net amount after taxes due to the size and availability of the
Company's net operating loss carry forwards.
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Beginning with year end 1997, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" which, required the
computation and disclosures of two new earnings per share ("EPS") calculations,
"basic" EPS and "diluted" EPS. EPS disclosures presented herein have been
calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128, and restated for comparative years.
Page 53
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average
number of common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings (loss) per
share for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 was 677,061, 677,202,
and 677,260, respectively. The weighted average number of common shares and
common share equivalents outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per
share for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 was 2,537,280, and
1,629,796, respectively. Loss per share computations, for 1996, exclude common
share equivalents, since the effect would be to reduce the loss per share
amount. All periods presented were restated to reflect the 9:09 to 1 reverse
stock split effective June 20, 1997 and the 100% common stock dividend declared
January 8, 1998 and paid February 13, 1998. The 100% common stock dividend was
accounted for as a 2 for 1 stock split. The following table is a reconciliation
of income (loss) and shares used in the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET INCOME PER SHARE
(LOSS) SHARES AMOUNT
---------- -------------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1998:
Basic EPS......................... $ 645 677,061 $ 0.95
-----------
-----------
Effect of dilutive securities:
Options and warrants........... 60,219
Convertible preferred stock.... 1,800,000
---------- --------------
Diluted EPS....................... $ 645 2,537,280 $ 0.25
---------- -------------- -----------
---------- -------------- -----------
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1997:
Basic EPS......................... $ 132 677,20 $ 0.20
-----------
-----------
Effect of dilutive securities:
Options and warrants........... 40,265
Convertible preferred stock.... 912,329
---------- --------------
Diluted EPS....................... $ 132 1,629,796 $ 0.08
---------- -------------- -----------
---------- -------------- -----------
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1996:
Basic and diluted EPS............. $ (1,244) 677,260 $ (1.84)
---------- -------------- -----------
---------- -------------- -----------
</TABLE>
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market
information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is
required to interpret market data and to develop the estimates of fair value.
Accordingly, the estimates of fair value in the financial statements are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current
market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and estimation
methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Page 54
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
STOCK OPTION PLANS
Compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current
market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. Pro forma net
income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for employee stock option
grants are based on recognition as expense, over the vesting period, the fair
value on the date of grant of all stock-based awards made in 1995 and subsequent
years.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". This Statement establishes
accounting and reporting for standards for derivative instruments and for
hedging activities. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 1999. The Company currently does not own any derivative instruments.
Therefore, management does not believe that this statement will have a
significant impact on the Company.
NOTE 2--REGULATORY MATTERS
The Bank entered into a Formal Agreement with the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency ("OCC") on December 14, 1995 (the "Formal Agreement"). Effective
November 18, 1997 the OCC terminated the Formal Agreement. Prior to its
termination the Bank was required to maintain certain regulatory capital levels,
appoint a new chief financial officer, make certain determinations as to the
reasonableness of any salary, consulting fee, expense reimbursement or other
type of compensation, review the need for, and the reasonableness of, all
existing consulting, employment and severance contracts, prepare a written
analysis of any new products or services, maintain the Bank's liquidity at a
level sufficient to sustain current and anticipated operations, develop a
three-year capital plan and strategic plan, and improve the Bank's loan
administration.
The Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") on October
26, 1995 with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the "FRB"). Effective
September 4, 1997 the MOU was terminated by the FRB. Prior to its termination,
the MOU prohibited the Company from paying dividends without prior approval of
the FRB, required the submission of a plan to increase the Bank's capital
ratios, required the Company to conduct a review of the senior and executive
management of the Company and the Bank, prohibited the incurrence or renewal of
debt without the FRB's approval, restricted cash expenditures in excess of
$10,000 in any month and prohibited the Company from making acquisitions or
divestitures or engaging in new lines of business without the FRB's approval.
Page 55
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3--INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The following is a summary of amortized cost, gross unrealized gains,
gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair values of the Company's
investment securities held-to-maturity and available-for-sale at December 31,
1998 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
--------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
TOTAL GROSS GROSS ESTIMATED TOTAL GROSS GROSS ESTIMATED
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities held-to-maturity:
Other government sponsored
agency securities.............. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 14,000 $ 10 $ - $ 14,010
-------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
-------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities......... $ 1,001 $ 7 $ - $ 1,008 $ 1,002 $ 3 $ - $ 1,005
FHLMC/FNMA-issued mortgage pass-
through certificates........... 16,933 100 3 17,030 4,327 22 - 4,349
Other government-sponsored
agency securities.............. - - - - 15,488 35 1 15,522
CMO's and REMIC's issued by U.S.
government sponsored agencies.. 48,278 146 41 48,383 4,977 3 24 4,956
Privately issued corporate bonds,
CMO's and REMIC's securities... 4,035 2 - 4,037 - - - -
-------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$ 70,247 $ 255 $ 44 $ 70,458 $ 25,794 $ 63 $ 25 $ 25,832
-------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
-------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
Gross realized gains and losses related to investment securities
were $39,000 and none, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1998,
$4,000 and $41,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1997, and
$24,000 and $27,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1996.
The estimated fair value and amortized cost of investment
securities at December 31, 1998 by contractual maturity, are shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AFTER ONE BUT AFTER FIVE BUT
WITHIN ONE YEAR WITHIN FIVE YEARS WITHIN TEN YEARS AFTER TEN YEARS
----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------
AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD TOTAL YIELD
--------- ------- --------- ------- ---------- ------ --------- ------- --------- ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities......... $ 1,008 5.85% $ - - $ - - $ - - $ 1,008 5.85%
FHLMC/FNMA-issued mortgage
pass-through certificates....... 406 6.34% 146 5.81% 2,033 6.52% 14,445 6.45% 17,030 6.45%
CMO's and REMIC's issued by
U.S. government sponsored
agencies........................ - - - - - - 48,383 6.42% 48,383 6.42%
Privately issued corporate bonds,
CMO's and REMIC's securities.... - - 2,037 5.41% - - 2,000 6.00% 4,037 5.70%
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$ 1,414 5.99% $ 2,183 5.44% $ 2,033 6.52% $ 64,828 6.41% $ 70,458 6.38%
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Amortized Cost $ 1,409 $ 2,182 $ 2,012 $ 64,644 $ 70,247
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
</TABLE>
Page 56
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Investment securities totaling $21.9 million were pledged to secure
government tax deposits, bankruptcy deposits, or for other purposes required
or permitted by law at December 31, 1998.
NOTE 4--LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The following is a summary of the major categories of loans receivable
outstanding at December 31, 1998 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
--------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Commercial loans:
Secured by one-to-four family residential properties............... $ 5,005 $ 6,545
Secured by multifamily residential properties...................... 3,111 2,494
Secured by commercial real properties.............................. 20,839 22,324
Other, secured and unsecured....................................... 24,337 21,264
Real estate construction and land development....................... - 3,148
Home equity lines of credit......................................... 271 252
Consumer installment and unsecured loans to individuals............. 3,707 5,508
--------- ---------
57,270 61,535
Unearned income.................................................... (298) (283)
--------- ---------
$ 56,972 $ 61,252
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1998 and 1997, the Company had identified impaired loans
with recorded investments of $1.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively.
Allowance for credit losses of $67,000 and $15,000 on loans with outstanding
balances of $616,000 and $200,000, respectively, representing the differences
between the value of the collateral supporting the loans and their
outstanding balances, is included in the allowance for credit losses. During
1998 and 1997, the average recorded investment of impaired loans was $ 6.5
million and $6.4 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997, and 1996 interest income recognized on impaired loans was
$542,000, $539,000 and $745,000 , respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Bank may make loans to officers
and directors as well as loans to companies and individuals affiliated with
or guaranteed by officers and directors of the Company and the Bank. Such
loans are made in the ordinary course of business at rates and terms no more
favorable than those offered to other customers with a similar credit
standing. The outstanding principal balance of these loans was $1.1 million
at December 31, 1998 and 1997. During 1998 there were $1.1 million of
advances and $1.1 million of repayments. Interest income recognized on these
loans amounted to $27,000, $16,000 and $22,000 during 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. At December 31, 1998, none of these loans were on nonaccrual
status. Based on analysis of information presently known to management about
the loans to officers and directors and their affiliates, management believes
all have the ability to comply with the present loan repayment terms.
Page 57
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
The following is a summary of activity in the allowance for credit
losses for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year.......................... $ 2,023 $ 2,969 $ 3,805
Provision for credit losses......................... - - -
Loans charged off................................... (407) (1,315) (1,300)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off.......... 528 369 464
--------- --------- --------
Balance, end of year................................ $ 2,144 $ 2,023 $ 2,969
--------- --------- --------
--------- --------- --------
</TABLE>
The following is a summary of nonperforming loans at December 31, 1998
and 1997, respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
--------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Nonaccrual loans..................................... $ 1,505 $ 1,201
Troubled debt restructurings......................... - 5,422
Loans contractually past due ninety or more days
with respect to either principal or interest
and still accruing interest....................... - -
--------- ---------
$ 1,505 $ 6,623
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
Interest foregone on nonperforming loans outstanding at December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 was $162,000, $177,000 and $171,000, respectively.
Foregone interest on nonperforming loans does not include interest forgone on
loans on nonperforming status that were restored to performing status prior
to year end, or subsequent to either being charged off prior to year end or
transferred to OREO prior to year end.
The ability of the Company's borrowers to honor their contracts is
substantially dependent upon economic conditions and real estate market
values throughout the Company's market area. At December 31, 1998, loans
aggregating $29.2 million were collateralized by liens on residential and
commercial real properties. While the Company's loan portfolio is generally
diversified with regard to the industries represented, at December 31, 1998,
the Company's loans to businesses and individuals engaged in entertainment
industry-related activities amounted to $12.1 million, none of which are
collateralized by real property.
Page 58
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
NOTE 5--PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT AND LEASE COMMITMENTS
The following is a summary of the major components of premises and
equipment at December 31, 1998 and 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
--------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Leasehold improvements............................. $ 1,680 $ 1,680
Furniture, fixtures and equipment.................. 3,262 3,229
--------- ---------
4,942 4,909
Less accumulated amortization and depreciation..... (4,216) (4,124)
--------- ---------
$ 726 $ 785
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
</TABLE>
Depreciation and amortization expense was $248,000 in 1998, $179,000
in 1997 and $194,000 in 1996. Net rental payments on operating leases
included in net occupancy expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations were $722,000 in 1998, $650,000 in 1997 and $652,000 in 1996.
The Bank leases approximately 24,000 square feet in an office building
at 1840 Century Park East, Los Angeles, California. The effective rent under
this lease is $2.33 per square feet or $55,666 per month for the period
November 1, 1995 to October 31, 2000. The effective rent for the period
November 1, 2000 to October 31, 2004 will be $2.83 per square foot or $67,607
per month. The rent is subject to annual adjustments for changes in property
taxes and operating costs.
In connection with the lease, the Bank issued the landlord a warrant to
purchase up to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company
at December 31, 1997. The exercise price of the warrant is currently $5.00
per share of Common Stock and $10.00 per share of Series A Preferred. The
warrant expires on December 31, 2002. The Company also granted the landlord
registration rights with respect to capital stock purchased by the landlord
(or its assignee) pursuant to the Warrant.
The future net minimum annual rental commitments at December 31, 1998
are summarized below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
--------------
<S> <C>
FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
1999........................................... $ 720
2000........................................... 744
2001........................................... 863
2002........................................... 823
2003 and thereafter............................ 1,499
-------------
$ 4,649
-------------
-------------
</TABLE>
Page 59
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6--INCOME TAXES
A current federal and state income tax provision of $8,000 was
recognized during 1998 primarily due to alternative minimum tax ("AMT") that
could not be offset by net operating loss carryforwards ("NOL"). No income
tax provision was recorded during 1997 due to the utilization of previously
unrecognized tax benefits to offset the current period tax liability. During
the year ended December 31, 1996 the Company recognized a tax benefit for
federal income tax purposes of approximately $579,000 (including $43,000 of
interest) related to a refund of prior year taxes from the carryback of a
portion of the NOL's for which tax benefit had not previously been recognized.
A reconciliation of the amounts computed by applying the federal
statutory rate of 34% for 1998 and 35% for 1997 and 1996 to the income (loss)
before tax benefits and the effective tax rate follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
------------------- ----------------------- -----------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Tax provision (benefit) at statuory rate.................. $ 222 34.0% $ 46 35.0% $ (638) (35.0%)
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Tax-exempt income on state municipal securities and loans... - - -
Valuation allowance on deferred tax asset................... (202) (30.9) (47) (35.6) -
Other, net.................................................. (12) (1.9) 1 0.6 59 3.0
------ ----------- ------- ---------- ------ --------
$ 8 1.2% $ - - $ (579) (32.0%)
------ ----------- ------- ---------- ------ --------
------ ----------- ------- ---------- ------ --------
</TABLE>
Page 60
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
The major components of the net deferred tax asset at December 31, 1998
and 1997 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
----------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating losses........................................... $ 7,925 $ 9,013
OREO reserves.................................................. 427 448
Accrued expenses............................................... 273 222
Alternative minimum tax credits................................ 239 218
Bad debt expense............................................... 74 230
Nonaccrual interest............................................ 71 36
State taxes.................................................... 1 1
Loan Fees...................................................... 74 61
Other.......................................................... 3 19
----------- ----------
Total deferred tax assets...................................... 9,087 10,248
----------- ----------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation................................................... 43 58
-----------------------
Total deferred tax liabilities................................. 43 58
-----------------------
Net deferred tax asset.......................................... 9,044 10,190
Valuation allowance............................................. (9,044) (10,190)
----------- ----------
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance.................. $ - $ -
----------- ----------
----------- ----------
</TABLE>
A valuation allowance has been placed against 100% of the net deferred
tax asset due to the uncertainty as to its ultimate realization.
For tax purposes at December 31, 1998, the Company had (i) federal NOL's
of $21.2 million, which begin to expire in 2007, (ii) California NOL's of
$9.8 million, of which $5.0 million will expire in 1999, $3.2 million will
expire in 2000, $1.3 million will expire in 2001, and $300,000 will expire in
2002; and (iii) an AMT credit at December 31, 1998 of $230,000 which may be
carried forward indefinitely.
NOTE 7--BENEFIT PLANS
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS. At December 31, 1998, the Company had in effect
three stock incentive plans. Under one or more of the plans, the Company
could grant to directors, officers, employees and consultants stock-based
incentive compensation in a variety of forms, including without limitation
non-qualified options, incentive options, sales and bonuses of common stock
and stock appreciation rights. Generally, awards under these plans may be
granted by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors on
such terms and conditions as the Board or committee determines. However, the
exercise price of options granted to non-employee directors may not be less
than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
At December 31, 1998, the only outstanding awards under the three stock
incentive plans in effect were stock options and a tandem stock appreciation
right with one of the options covering 16,500 shares of common stock. In
addition, as December 31, 1998, there were outstanding options under a stock
option plan that had terminated (such four stock incentive plans, the
"Plans"). At December 31, 1998, 94,920 shares were available for future
awards under the plans (and any shares underlying any options or other awards
that expire without being exercised would also be eligible for future awards).
Page 61
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
The following summarizes option grants, cancellations and exercises
under the Plans for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTION PRICE
RANGE PER
SHARE
--------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, January 1, 1996 66,211 $ 13.64 - $ 22.73
Granted.......................... 59,350 4.83 - 8.52
Cancelled........................ (64,137) 6.27 - 22.73
Exercised........................ - -
-----------
Outstanding, December 31, 1996 61,424 4.83 - 8.52
Granted.......................... 111,258 5.00 - 7.96
Cancelled........................ (6,254) 5.75 - 8.52
Exercised........................ - -
-----------
Outstanding, December 31, 1997 166,428 4.83 - 8.52
Granted.......................... 126,970 4.63 - 7.38
Cancelled........................ (16,250) 6.00 - 7.96
Exercised........................ - -
-----------
Outstanding, December 31, 1998 277,148 $ 4.63 - $ 8.52
-----------
-----------
</TABLE>
Of the outstanding options under the Plans at December 31, 1998: (i)
options to purchase 187,971 shares were vested and exercisable; and (ii) the
remaining options become exercisable as follows: 1999--43,716; 2000--29,372;
and 2001--16,089.
The estimated per share weighted average fair value of options granted
was $4.22, $3.82 and $3.09 during 1998, 1997 and 1996. The Company applies
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations in
accounting for the Plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been
recognized for the Plans. SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," encourages, but does not require, companies to record
compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value.
Had compensation cost for the Plans been determined based on the fair value
at the grant dates for awards under the Plans consistent with the method of
SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income for 1998 and 1997 would have been
decreased by $91,000 and $57,000, respectively, and the Company's net loss
1996 would have been increased by $23,000. Basic and diluted earnings per
share would have decreased by $.13 and $.04 for 1998, respectively, and $.08
and $.04 for 1997, respectively. Basic and diluted loss per share would have
increased by $.03 for 1996.
The fair values of options granted under the Plans during 1996 and
thereafter were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used:
1998 - no dividend yield, expected volatility of 74%, risk-free interest rate
of 4.65%, and an expected life of 10 years; 1997 - no dividend yield,
expected volatility of 73%, risk-free interest rate of 5.74%, and an expected
life of 10 years; 1996 - no dividend yield, expected volatility of 81%,
risk-free interest rate of 6.3% and an expected life of 10 years.
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN. The Company maintains a defined
contribution retirement plan under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code. Employees are eligible to participate following six months of
continuous employment. Under the plan, employee contributions were partially
matched by the Company through August 31, 1995. The plan currently remains in
force for employee contributions only. Should the Company elect to match
participant contributions, such matching becomes vested when the employee
reaches three years of service.
Page 62
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
NOTE 8 - BORROWED FUNDS
The following summarizes borrowed funds and weighted average rates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
----------------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------------
BALANCES AT AVERAGE AVERAGE BALANCES AT AVERAGE AVERAGE BALANCES AT AVERAGE AVERAGE
YEAR-END BALANCE RATE YEAR-END BALANCE RATE YEAR-END BALANCE RATE
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- -------- ----------- --------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase
agreements...................... $ 1,000 $ 2,279 5.92% $ 5,050 $ 1,637 5.68% - $ 1,140 2.19%
Other borrowings................. 19,300 9,276 5.57% 3,500 143 4.89% - - -
</TABLE>
The maximum amount of federal funds purchased and securities sold with
agreements to repurchase at any month end was $4.0 million, $5.0 million and
$1.5 million during 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The average amount of
federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase was
$2.3 million, $1.6 million and $1.1million during 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
Other borrowings are primarily comprised of Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB")
advances. At December 31, 1998 FHLB advances included $1.3 million maturing in
January 1999, with a weighted average fixed rate of 4.96%, $3.5 million maturing
June 1999 with a fixed rate of 4.99%, and $6.5 million maturing October 2000 and
$8.0 million maturing July 2001 with a variable rate of 5.1% based on the London
Inter Bank Offering Rate ("LIBOR") index. The maximum amount of other borrowings
outstanding at any month-end was $19.3 million and $3.5 million during 1998 and
1997, respectively. The Bank did not utilize other borrowings during 1996.
The Bank had $15.8 million and $18.5 million of unused borrowing capacity
from the FHLB at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
NOTE 9--AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FROM BANK; RESTRICTIONS ON CASH BALANCES; CAPITAL
The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. At
present, substantially all of the Company's revenues come from interest earned
on deposits, investments and loans. Management believes the Company's cash
balance plus interest revenues, on a separate-entity basis, are adequate to
cover its modest level of operating expenses.
The prior approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends
declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the Bank's net income
for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years,
less any required transfers to surplus. As a result of these limitations and net
losses incurred by the Bank in 1996, the Bank could not have declared dividends
to the Company at December 31, 1998 without the prior approval of the OCC.
The OCC also has authority to prohibit the Bank from engaging in activities
that the OCC regards as unsafe or unsound in conducting its business. It is
possible that, depending upon the financial condition of the Bank and other
factors, the OCC could assert that the payment of dividends or other payments
is, under some circumstances, considered to be an unsafe or unsound practice.
Further, future cash dividends by the Bank to the Company will depend upon
management's assessment of the Bank's future capital requirements.
Page 63
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
In addition, federal law restricts the Bank's extension of credit to, or
the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of, the Company.
Investments in stock or other securities of the Company are similarly restricted
as is the taking of such securities as collateral for loans. Restrictions
prevent the Company from borrowing from the Bank unless the loans are secured by
designated amounts of marketable obligations. Further, secured loans to and
investments in the Company or its affiliates by the Bank are limited to 10% of
the Bank's capital stock and surplus (as defined by federal regulations) and are
limited, in the aggregate, to 20% of the Bank's contributed capital (as defined
by federal regulations).
Federal Reserve Board regulations require the Bank to maintain certain
minimum certain minimum reserve balances. Cash balances maintained to meet
reserve requirements are not available for use by the Bank or the Company.
During 1998 and 1997 the average reserve balances for the Bank were
approximately $758,000 and $667,000, respectively. Neither the Company nor the
Bank is required to maintain compensating balances to assure credit availability
under existing borrowing arrangements.
The Company and the Bank are subject to various capital requirements
administered by the federal banking regulatory agencies. Failure to meet minimum
capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory--and possibly additional
discretionary--actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on the Company's financial statements. Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Company and Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative
measures of the Company's and the Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The
Company's and the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to
qualitative judgment by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and
other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy
require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set
forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the
regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Management believes, as of
December 31, 1998, the Company and Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements
to which it is subject.
At December 31, 1998 and 1997, the most recent notification from the OCC
categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well as capitalized, the Bank
must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage
ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events
since the most recent notification which management believes have changed the
Bank's category.
Page 64
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
The Company's actual amounts and ratios are presented in the table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TO BE CATEGORIZED
AS WELL
CAPITALIZED UNDER
FOR CAPITAL PROMPT CORRECTIVE
ACTUAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES ACTION
----------------------- ------------------------ -----------------------
AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
As of December 31, 1998
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Company.................................. $ 14,001 18.65% $ 6,004 >=8.0% n/a
Bank..................................... 10,646 14.75% 5,775 >=8.0% $ 7,219 >=10.0%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Company.................................. 13,048 17.38% 3,002 >=4.0% n/a
Bank..................................... 9,728 13.48% 2,888 >=4.0% 4,331 >=6.0%
Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets
Company.................................. 13,048 8.78% 5,945 >=4.0% n/a
Bank..................................... 9,728 6.69% 5,819 >=4.0% 7,274 >=5.0%
As of December 31, 1997
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Company.................................. 13,329 18.25% 5,844 >=8.0% n/a
Bank..................................... 8,296 11.63% 5,705 >=8.0% 7,132 >=10.0%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Company.................................. 12,402 16.98% 2,922 >=4.0% n/a
Bank..................................... 7,390 10.36% 2,853 >=4.0% 4,279 >=6.0%
Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets
Company.................................. 12,402 10.43% 4,756 >=4.0% n/a
Bank..................................... 7,390 6.48% 4,559 >=4.0% 5,699 >=5.0%
</TABLE>
NOTE 10--COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial
instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and financial guarantees. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate
risk in excess of the amount reflected in the consolidated statement of
financial condition.
Exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party
to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, letters of credit
and financial guarantees written, is represented by the contractual notional
amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as is does for on-balance sheet
instruments.
The Company had outstanding loan commitments aggregating $11.6 million and
$9.4 million in December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively. In addition, the
Company had $652,000 and $600,000 outstanding letters of credit at December 31,
1998 and 1997, respectively. Substantially all of the Company's loan commitments
at December 31, 1998 for commercial loans with variable interest rates.
Page 65
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Loan commitments are agreements to lend to a customer subject to certain
conditions. Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since a portion of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
The Company is from time to time is party to lawsuits, which arise in the
normal course of business. The Company does not believe that any pending
lawsuits at December 31, 1998 will have a material adverse effect on the
financial position of the Company.
In February 1995, counterclaims were filed against the Bank in an action
commenced by British & Commonwealth Merchant Bank ("BCMB"), as agent for itself
and the Bank, in England against Lloyd's Underwriters and certain other parties
(collectively, "Lloyd's"). The Bank reached an agreement with Lloyd's for the
settlement of the Bank's claim against Lloyd's and Lloyd's counterclaims against
the Bank. During 1996, the Bank entered into the settlement not as a result of
the Bank's conclusions as to the merits of Lloyd's counterclaims against the
Bank, but solely as a matter of resolving those counterclaims in connection with
the Bank's effort to recapitalize. The agreement provided that BCMB will release
the Bank from any claim that BCMB might have against the Bank should BCMB suffer
loss in connection with Lloyd's counterclaims against BCMB in continuing
litigation. Prior to December 31, 1996, the Company made a single payment of
approximately $1.0 million as full settlement of this matter.
NOTE 11--SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
The following information supplements the statements of cash flows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest paid......................................... $ 3,459 $ 2,825 $ 3,147
Income tax refund..................................... - - 579
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Transactions:
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale.. 173 114 78
Transfers to OREO from loans receivable, net.......... 176 221 -
</TABLE>
NOTE 12--DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value
of each class of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate
that value.
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS: For those short-term
investments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimation of fair value.
SECURITIES: For securities classified as, held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale, fair value equals quoted market prices, if available. If a
quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted
market prices for similar securities.
Page 66
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
LOANS: Variable rate loans have carrying amounts that approximate fair
value. The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting the future
cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to
borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. In
establishing the credit risk component of the fair value calculations for loans
the Company concluded the allowance for credit losses represented a reasonable
estimate of credit risk component of the fair value at December 31, 1998 and
1997.
DEPOSITS: The fair value of demand and interest checking, money market
accounts and savings deposits is the amount payable on demand at the
reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is
estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar
maturities.
BORROWED FUNDS: The carrying value for this relatively short-term debt
is a reasonable approximation of its fair value. Borrowings with maturities
greater than one year bear interest at variable rates.
The estimated fair values of financial instruments are presented below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1998 DECEMBER 31, 1997
------------------------ ------------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
----------- --------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Assets:
Cash, cash equivalents and deposit with
other financial institutions................ $ 12,205 $ 12,205 $ 16,336 $ 16,336
Securities available-for-sale................. 70,458 70,458 25,832 25,832
Securities held-to-maturity................... - - 14,000 14,010
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses..... 54,828 54,866 59,229 59,478
Financial Liabilities:
Demand deposits, money market and savings..... 77,925 77,925 66,000 66,000
Time certificates of deposit.................. 29,047 29,355 31,388 31,938
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase.............. 1,000 1,000 5,050 5,050
Other borrowings.............................. 19,300 19,300 3,500 3,500
</TABLE>
Page 67
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
NOTE 13--PARENT COMPANY INFORMATION
The following financial information presents the statements of condition of
the Company on a parent-only basis as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related statements of operations and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1998.
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1998 1997
---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Cash with Bank........................................ $ 98 $ 29
Federal Funds......................................... 300 1,900
Securities held-to-maturity........................... - 2,000
Loan receivable....................................... 2,906 1,036
Investment in the Bank................................ 9,939 7,428
Other assets.......................................... 15 47
---------- ----------
Total assets...................................... $ 13,258 $ 12,440
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
Liabilities........................................... $ - $ -
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock..................................... 7,350 7,350
Common stock........................................ 24,613 24,613
Accumulated deficit................................. (18,916) (19,561)
Accumulated other comprehensive income.............. 211 38
---------- ----------
Total shareholders' equity.......................... 13,258 12,440
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity........ $ 13,258 $ 12,440
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
Page 68
<PAGE>
NATIONAL MERCANTILE BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income..................................................... $ 310 $ 151 $ 2
Other income........................................................ - 1 -
----------- ---------- ----------
Total operating income.............................................. 310 152 2
Other operating expense............................................. 3 - 145
----------- ---------- ----------
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed net income
(loss) of the Bank................................................ 307 152 (143)
Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of the Bank............... 338 (20) (1,680)
----------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss) before income tax benefit........................ 645 132 (1,823)
Income tax benefit.................................................. - - (579)
----------- ---------- ----------
Net income (loss)................................................... $ 645 $ 132 $ (1,244)
----------- ---------- ----------
----------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss).............................................. $ 645 $ 132 $ (1,244)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities.:
Equity in undistributed net (income) loss of the Bank, net... (338) 20 1,680
Other, net................................................... 32 (47) -
----------- ---------- ----------
339 105 436
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in Bank............................................. (2,000) (2,500) (434)
Purchase of securities held-to maturity........................ - (2,000) -
Proceeds of matured securities held-to maturity................ 2,000
Purchase of loans participated................................. (1,870) (1,036) -
----------- ---------- ----------
Net cash used in investing activities........................ (1,870) (5,536) (434)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of Preferred Stock.................. - 7,350 -
Other, net..................................................... - (1) -
----------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by financing activities.................... - 7,349 -
----------- ---------- ----------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents............. (1,531) 1,918 2
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year................. 1,929 11 9
----------- ---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year....................... $ 398 $ 1,929 $ 11
----------- ---------- ----------
----------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
Page 69
<PAGE>
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO.
- -------
<C> <S>
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, dated June 20, 1997 (1)
3.2 Bylaws of the Company, as amended, restated as of December 18, 1992 (2)
10.1 Employment Agreement and Addendum dated June 21, 1996 between Mercantile
National Bank and Scott A. Montgomery (3)
10.2 Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement dated December 20, 1996 between
Mercantile National Bank and Scott A. Montgomery (1)
10.3 Letter Agreement dated June 5, 1996 between Mercantile National Bank and
Carol A. Ward (3)
10.4 Letter Agreement dated July 17, 1996 between Mercantile National Bank
and Joseph W. Kiley III (4)
10.5 Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and its directors (5)
10.6 First Floor Lease at 1840 Century Park East, Los Angeles, California,
dated as of December 21, 1982 between Northrop Corporation and
Mercantile National Bank (2)
10.7 Second Floor Lease at 1840 Century Park East, Los Angeles, California,
dated as of December 21, 1982 between Northrop Corporation and
Mercantile National Bank for space at 1840 Century Park East, Los
Angeles, California, as amended by Amendment to Second Floor Lease dated
as of June 7, 1986, and as amended by Second Amendment to Second Floor
Lease dated as of December 18, 1992 between California State Teachers'
Retirement System and Mercantile National Bank (2)
10.8 Lease Restructure Agreement dated December 31, 1995 by and between
California State Teachers' Retirement System and Mercantile National
Bank (6)
10.9 Warrant Agreement dated December 31, 1995 by and between the Company and
California State Teachers' Retirement System (6)
10.10 Registration Rights Agreement dated December 31, 1995 by and between the
Company and California State Teachers' Retirement System (6)
10.11 Warrant Agreement dated April 30, 1996 between the Company and U.S.
Stock Transfer Corporation (3)
10.12 National Mercantile Bancorp 1983 Stock Option Plan, as amended
March 22, 1991 (7)
10.13 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 1983 Stock Option Plan (2)
10.14 National Mercantile Bancorp 1990 Stock Option Plan (8)
10.15 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 1990 Stock Option Plan (2)
10.16 National Mercantile Bancorp 1994 Stock Option Plan (9)
10.17 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 1994 Stock Option Plan (10)
10.18 National Mercantile Bancorp 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (11)
10.19 National Mercantile Bancorp amended 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (12)
10.20 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (11)
Page 70
<PAGE>
10.21 Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and Conrad Company (13)
10.22 Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and Wildwood
Enterprises Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (13)
10.23 Bank Service Agreement dated April 21, 1997 between RH Investment
Corporation and Mercantile National Bank (1)
10.24 Investment Management Agreement dated December 1, 1997 between
Mercantile National Bank and Windsor Financial Group, Inc (1)
11. Statement regarding computation of per share earnings (see "Note
1--Summary of Significant Accounting Policies--Earnings (Loss) Per
Share"--of the "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in
"Item 8. Financial Statements" in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB)
21. Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23. Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Auditors
27. Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1997.
(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as an exhibit to Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference.
(6) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference.
(7) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1991 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Proxy Statement dated May 24, 1990 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(9) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Proxy Statement dated April 18, 1994
(10) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1994 and incorporated herein by reference.
(11) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated August 7, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
(12) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 1998.
(13) Filed as an exhibit to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-2
dated February 10, 1997 and amendments there to add incorporated
herein by reference.
Page 71
<PAGE>
Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Mercantile National Bank
1840 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-33139 of National Mercantile Bancorp on Form S-8 of our report, dated
January 23, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of National
Mercantile Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 1998.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 23, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NATIONAL
MERCANTILE BANCORP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND VARIOUS SCHEDULES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1998
<CASH> 5,405
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS> 0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD> 6,800
<TRADING-ASSETS> 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE> 71,849
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING> 0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET> 0
<LOANS> 56,972
<ALLOWANCE> 2,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 141,623
<DEPOSITS> 106,972
<SHORT-TERM> 5,800
<LIABILITIES-OTHER> 1,093
<LONG-TERM> 14,500
0
7,350
<COMMON> 24,613
<OTHER-SE> (18,705)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 141,623
<INTEREST-LOAN> 5,937
<INTEREST-INVEST> 3,349
<INTEREST-OTHER> 795
<INTEREST-TOTAL> 10,081
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT> 2,833
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 3,485
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET> 6,596
<LOAN-LOSSES> 0
<SECURITIES-GAINS> 39
<EXPENSE-OTHER> 6,798
<INCOME-PRETAX> 653
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY> 645
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 645
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.95
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL> 5.18
<LOANS-NON> 1,505
<LOANS-PAST> 0
<LOANS-TROUBLED> 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM> 41
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN> 2,023
<CHARGE-OFFS> 407
<RECOVERIES> 528
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE> 2,144
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC> 1,359
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN> 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED> 785
</TABLE>
