<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) June 21, 1994
--------------------
CITADEL HOLDING CORPORATION
---------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 1-8625 95-3885184
-------- ------ ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission File (I.R.S. Employer of
incorporation) Number) File Number)
600 NORTH BRAND BLVD., GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA 91203-1241
-------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (818) 956-7100
--------------
N/A
---
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>
Citadel Holding Corporation
Item 5. Other Events. The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary, Fidelity
- - - ------- -------------
Federal Bank, a Federal Savings Bank, filed Amendment No. 1 to the Offering
Circular on Form OC attached as Exhibit A with the Office of Thrift Supervision
on June 21, 1994. The original Offering Circular was filed with the Office of
Thrift Supervision on June 16, 1994.
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: June 22, 1994 CITADEL HOLDING CORPORATION
By: /s/ Godfrey B. Evans
--------------------------------
Godfrey B. Evans
Executive Vice President
and General Counsel
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
AS FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION ON JUNE 21, 1994
OTS DOCKET NO. 5770
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION
1700 G STREET, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20552
----------------
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
FORM OC
OFFERING CIRCULAR
----------------
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
(EXACT NAME OF APPLICANT AS SPECIFIED IN CHARTER)
----------------
600 NORTH BRAND AVENUE
GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA 91203
(818) 956-7100
(STREET ADDRESS OF APPLICANT, CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE)
GODFREY B. EVANS, ESQ.
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
600 NORTH BRAND AVENUE
GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA 91203
(818) 956-7100
(NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS)
----------------
COPIES TO:
DHIYA EL-SADEN, ESQ. E. WAIDE WARNER, JR., ESQ.
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL
333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE 450 LEXINGTON AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
(213) 229-7000 (212) 450-4000
----------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS OFFERING CIRCULAR.
If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered pur-
suant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following
box. [_]
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to 563g.16 of the rules and regulations
of the Office of Thrift Supervision, other than securities offered only in
connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the fol-
lowing box. [_]
----------------
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK (THE "BANK"), HEREBY AMENDS THIS
FORM OC (INCLUDING THE OFFERING CIRCULAR CONTAINED HEREIN) ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE BANK SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS FORM OC SHALL
THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 563G.6 OF THE REGULA-
TIONS OF THE OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, OR UNTIL THIS FORM OC SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, ACTING PURSUANT TO
SUCH SECTION 563G.6, MAY DETERMINE.
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK,
A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET
PURSUANT TO 12 C.F.R. 563G.7(A)(5) SHOWING LOCATION IN
OFFERING CIRCULAR OF INFORMATION REQUIRED BY ITEMS OF FORM OC
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM NUMBER AND HEADING CAPTION OR LOCATION IN OFFERING CIRCULAR
----------------------- ----------------------------------------
<C> <S> <C>
1. Forepart of Form OC and Outside
Front Cover Page of Offering
Circular....................... Facing Page of Form OC and Outside
Front Cover Page of Offering
Circular
2. Inside Front and Outside Back
Cover Pages of Offering
Circular....................... Inside Front Cover Page of Offering
Circular
3. Summary Information, Risk
Factors and Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges............... Offering Circular Summary; Risk
Factors
4. Use of Proceeds................. Offering Circular Summary; Use of
Proceeds
5. Determination of Offering Price. Plan of Distribution
6. Dilution........................ Not Applicable
7. Selling Security Holders........ Not Applicable
8. Plan of Distribution............ Plan of Distribution
9. Description of Securities to be
Registered..................... Offering Circular Summary;
Restructuring and Recapitalization;
Description of
Capital Stock; Shares Eligible for
Future Sale; Transfer Restrictions
10. Interests of Named Experts and
Counsel........................ Not Applicable
11. Information with Respect to the
Registrant..................... Offering Circular Summary; Risk
Factors; Restructuring and
Recapitalization; Capitalization;
Selected Historical Consolidated
Financial Data; Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Information;
Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations; Business; Dividend
Policy; Management; Principal
Stockholders; Certain Transactions;
Description of Capital Stock
12. Disclosure of OTS's Position on
Indemnification for Securities
Act Liabilities................ Not Applicable
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+THIS OFFERING CIRCULAR HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, +
+BUT HAS NOT BEEN AUTHORIZED FOR USE IN FINAL FORM. INFORMATION CONTAINED +
+HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY +
+MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE +
+OFFERING CIRCULAR IS DECLARED EFFECTIVE BY THE OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION. +
+THE OFFERING CIRCULAR SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE +
+SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALES OF THESE SHARES +
+IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL +
+PRIOR TO THE REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY +
+SUCH STATE. +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
OFFERING CIRCULAR DATED JUNE 21, 1994
20,952,381 Shares
[LOGO OF FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK FSB]
Class A Common Stock (par value $0.01 per share)
and
Class C Common Stock (par value $0.01 per share)
All of the shares of Class A Common Stock (the "Class A Common Stock") and
Class C Common Stock (the "Class C Common Stock") of Fidelity Federal Bank, A
Federal Savings Bank ("Fidelity" or the "Bank"), offered hereby are being is-
sued and sold by the Bank. This offering is contingent upon the sale of the
20,952,381 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock being of-
fered hereby and the approval by the Office of Thrift Supervision of the vari-
ous transactions described herein. See "Restructuring and Recapitalization."
The Class C Common Stock is identical to the Class A Common Stock, except that
Class C Common Stock has limited voting rights. Purchasers that are subject to
regulatory restrictions on the ownership of voting stock of thrifts may wish to
purchase shares of Class C Common Stock rather than Class A Common Stock. Upon
certain transfers, the Class C Common Stock is convertible into Class A Common
Stock. The holders of Class A Common Stock will have full voting rights. See
"Description of Capital Stock."
Fidelity is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citadel Holding Corporation,
a Delaware corporation ("Citadel"). Immediately prior to the completion of this
offering, the currently outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01, of
Fidelity will be reclassified into 6,595,624 shares of Class B Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share (the "Class B Common Stock"), which number of shares
may be reduced as described herein. See "Restructuring and Recapitalization -
Recapitalization." Upon the completion of this offering, the purchasers of the
shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby will own
all of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock,
which will represent in the aggregate approximately 76.1% of the outstanding
Common Stock of the Bank, and Citadel will own all of the outstanding shares of
Class B Common Stock, which will represent approximately 23.9% of the outstand-
ing Common Stock of the Bank, assuming 20,952,381 shares are purchased and no
closing adjustments are made. See "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Recapi-
talization - Closing Adjustments." The holders of Class B Common Stock (ini-
tially Citadel) will have limited voting rights. See "Description of Capital
Stock."
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the Common Stock of
the Bank. It is currently estimated that the initial public offering price of
the Class A Common Stock and the Class C Common Stock will be $5.25 per share.
See "Plan of Distribution" for information relating to the factors considered
in determining the initial public offering price of the Class A Common Stock
and Class C Common Stock.
Prospective purchasers of the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock of-
fered hereby will be required to execute and deliver to the Bank an Investors'
Purchase Agreement substantially in the form attached as Annex A hereto. The
Investors' Purchase Agreement will, among other things, restrict the purchasers
from reselling their shares for a 30-day period following the closing of this
offering and, following such 30 day period, limit resales of such shares to
blocks of not less than 100,000 shares until the date the Bank first files its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 1994, which is ex-
pected to occur in March 1995. See "Description of Capital Stock." The Class A
Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby will not be listed on any
securities exchange and will be illiquid.
The offering of the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock made hereby
is part of a series of transactions, including, but not limited to, the sale of
certain problem and other assets in one or more bulk sales pursuant to defini-
tive purchase and sale agreements, designed to enhance the Bank's asset quality
and improve its regulatory capital ratios. See "Offering Circular Summary,"
"Restructuring and Recapitalization" and "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Fi-
nancial Information."
THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. POTENTIAL INVEST-
ORS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE MATTERS SET FORTH UNDER "RISK FACTORS."
THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE OF-
FICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, THE SE-
CURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY OTHER FEDERAL AGENCY, OR BY ANY STATE
SECURITIES COMMISSION, NOR HAS SUCH OFFICE, OTHER AGENCY OR ANY STATE SECURI-
TIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS OFFERING CIRCULAR.
ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRICE TO PLACEMENT AGENCY PROCEEDS TO
PUBLIC FEE(1) BANK(2)
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Class A Common Stock and Class C Common
Stock,
Per Share $ $ $
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Minimum $ $ $
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Maximum(3) $ $ $
- - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(1)The Placement Agency Fee payable to the Placement Agent (the "Placement
Agent") will be paid directly by Fidelity out of the proceeds of this offering.
In addition, Fidelity and Citadel have agreed to indemnify the Placement Agent
and certain related persons against certain civil liabilities, including lia-
bilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The above table does not
reflect additional fees paid to J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. for various advi-
sory and other investment banking services provided to Fidelity in connection
with the Restructuring and Recapitalization and this offering. See "Plan of
Distribution."
(2)Before deducting estimated expenses payable by Fidelity of $ .
(3)The Bank has indicated to the Placement Agent that it may accept
subscriptions for up to an additional 1,047,619 shares of Class A Common Stock
and Class C Common Stock (the "Additional Shares") on the same terms as set
forth above at any time prior to the closing of this offering. See "Plan of
Distribution."
The undersigned has been retained by Fidelity to act as Placement Agent in con-
nection with the sale of the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock of-
fered hereby. Any Class A Common Stock or Class C Common Stock offered by the
Placement Agent on behalf of Fidelity will be subject to Fidelity's absolute
right to reject orders in whole or in part. The offering is being made on a
"best efforts" basis and will terminate no later than July , 1994. It is ex-
pected that delivery of the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock will
be made at the offices of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., New York, New York, on
or about July , 1994.
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
, 1994
<PAGE>
THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY ARE NOT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS OR SAVINGS DEPOSITS AND
ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOV-
ERNMENT AGENCY.
No dealer, salesperson or other person has been authorized to give any infor-
mation or to make any representation other than those contained in this Offer-
ing Circular in connection with the offer contained herein. If given or made,
such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been au-
thorized by the Bank, the Placement Agent or any other person. Neither the de-
livery of this Offering Circular nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any
circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the af-
fairs of the Bank since the date hereof or since the date as of which informa-
tion is set forth herein. This Offering Circular does not constitute an offer
to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities offered
hereby in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such
offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
<S> <C>
Available Information................. 2
Offering Circular Summary............. 3
Risk Factors.......................... 15
Use of Proceeds....................... 25
Restructuring and Recapitalization.... 26
Capitalization........................ 32
Selected Historical Consolidated
Financial Data....................... 33
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Information................ 35
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Information... 37
Pro Forma Impact of the Bulk Sales on
Loans and Other Real Estate Assets... 40
Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations........................... 43
Business.............................. 83
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
<S> <C>
Dividend Policy........................ 132
Management............................. 133
Principal Stockholders................. 140
Certain Transactions................... 141
Description of Capital Stock........... 142
Shares Eligible for Future Sale;
Transfer Restrictions................. 145
Certain Federal Income Tax
Considerations........................ 146
Plan of Distribution................... 148
Legal Matters.......................... 149
Experts................................ 149
Glossary............................... 150
Annex A - Form of Investors' Purchase
Agreement............................. A-1
Index to Financial Statements.......... F-1
Financial Statements................... F-3
</TABLE>
Until , 1994 (90 days after the date hereof), all dealers effecting trans-
actions in the Class A Common Stock or Class C Common Stock, whether or not
participating in this distribution, may be required to deliver an Offering
Circular.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Bank has filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") a Form OC
with respect to the securities covered by this Offering Circular. For the pur-
poses hereof, the term "Form OC" means the original Form OC and any and all
amendments thereto. This Offering Circular, which constitutes part of the Form
OC, does not contain all the information set forth in the Form OC and the ex-
hibits and schedules thereto, to which reference is hereby made. Statements
made in this Offering Circular as to the contents of any contract, agreement
or other document are not necessarily complete; with respect to each such con-
tract, agreement or other document filed as an exhibit to the Form OC, refer-
ence is made to the exhibit for a more complete description of the matters in-
volved. The Form OC and the exhibits thereto may be inspected without charge
at the public reference facilities of the OTS at 1700 G Street, N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. 20552, or at the OTS Western Regional Office, One Montgomery Street,
San Francisco, California 94104. Copies of such materials may be obtained from
the OTS at prescribed rates.
The Bank will be subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, in accordance therewith, will file pe-
riodic reports and other information with the OTS. Such periodic reports and
other information filed by the Bank may be inspected and copied at the public
reference facilities maintained by the OTS at 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20552, or at the OTS Western Regional Office, One Montgomery Street, San
Francisco, California 94104.
2
<PAGE>
OFFERING CIRCULAR SUMMARY
This Offering Circular Summary, including the Summary Historical Consolidated
Financial Data of Fidelity Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, and its sub-
sidiaries (collectively, "Fidelity"), and the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Information of Fidelity set forth below, is qualified in its entirety
by the more detailed information and all other financial information appearing
elsewhere in this Offering Circular, and assumes that the Bank has not accepted
subscriptions for the 1,047,619 additional shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock (the "Additional Shares"). Unless the context otherwise
requires, "Fidelity" or the "Bank" refers solely to Fidelity Federal Bank, A
Federal Savings Bank, and its subsidiaries, and the "Company" refers to the
Bank, its subsidiaries, and Gateway Investment Services, Inc. ("Gateway"),
which prior to the closing of this offering (the "Closing") will become a whol-
ly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. See "Glossary" for the definition of certain
terms used in this Offering Circular.
THE COMPANY
The Company, through Fidelity, offers a broad range of consumer financial serv-
ices, including demand and term deposits and mortgage loans. In addition,
through Gateway, a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD")
registered broker/dealer, the Company provides customers of the Bank with in-
vestment products, including a number of mutual funds, annuities and unit in-
vestment trusts. The Company operates through 42 branches, all of which are lo-
cated in Southern California, principally in Los Angeles and Orange counties.
At March 31, 1994, Fidelity's mortgage loan portfolio (including loans held for
sale) aggregated approximately $3.6 billion, of which approximately 72.6% was
secured by residential properties containing 2 or more apartment units, 19.0%
was secured by single family residences and 8.4% was secured by commercial and
other property. At that same date, 96.1% of Fidelity's loans consisted of ad-
justable rate mortgages.
Fidelity's deposit accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corpo-
ration (the "FDIC") through the Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF")
to the maximum extent permitted by law. Fidelity is subject to the examination,
supervision and reporting requirements of the OTS, its primary federal banking
regulator, and is also subject to examination and supervision by the FDIC.
Gateway is also subject to regulation as a registered broker/dealer by the Se-
curities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
In mid-1992, Fidelity and Citadel Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation
("Citadel"), commenced a series of steps to reorganize internally in order to
strengthen the Bank's internal operations and meet the needs of its customer
base. First, a new Chief Executive Officer and certain additional senior man-
agement personnel were hired to strengthen key areas, such as mortgage banking,
residential loan originations, credit administration, retail financial services
and real estate management. Second, the Bank broadened the product line of
loans originated by the Bank and increased its emphasis on mortgage banking and
single family originations, in particular developing its loan pipeline hedging
capability. The Bank also reorganized its retail branch system to integrate the
provision of traditional banking services with the provision through Gateway of
a broader range of nontraditional financial services and uninsured investment
products. Third, the Bank upgraded its systems management capabilities by con-
verting to new computer systems in its retail banking and loan administration
operations and by adding enhanced software capability to the asset/liability
management function. Fourth, management began to implement stricter credit con-
trols and credit reviews. Finally, during the last quarter of 1993, the Bank
undertook analyses of its internal controls, staffing levels and in-house staff
functions. These analyses identified substantial cost-reduction opportunities
via consolidation of redundant functions, reduction in management and staffing
levels, closing, consolidating or selling certain branches and out-sourcing of
certain staff functions. Based upon such studies, management believes that op-
erating expenses could be reduced in the future. See "Business - Retail Finan-
cial Services Group," "- Mortgage Banking Group Operations," "- Credit Adminis-
tration," "- Loan Monitoring" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Fi-
nancial Condition and Results of Operations - Three Months Ended March 31, 1994
Compared with Three Months Ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993 - Operat-
ing Expenses."
3
<PAGE>
The Bank intends to sell two branch properties, approximately $190 million in
loans held for sale and approximately $366 million of deposits in nine of its
branches in the third quarter of 1994. The Bank has received offers on these
deposits at a premium. Such transactions are expected to improve Fidelity's
capital ratios.
Fidelity and Gateway are currently wholly-owned subsidiaries of Citadel, a fi-
nancial services holding company. The principal executive offices of the Com-
pany are located at 600 North Brand Boulevard, Glendale, California 91203, tel-
ephone number (818) 956-7100.
RESTRUCTURING AND RECAPITALIZATION
BACKGROUND OF THE TRANSACTION
Since 1991, the Southern California economy and real estate markets have shown
significant declines, adversely affecting the Bank's performance and loan and
real estate portfolios. The Bank reported net losses of $65.9 million and net
income of $0.3 million and $8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 1993,
1992 and 1991, respectively, and reported net losses of $14.2 million for the
first quarter of 1994. The Bank had nonperforming assets ("NPAs") totaling $236
million, $234 million and $125 million, respectively, at December 31, 1993,
1992 and 1991, and $266 million at the end of the first quarter of 1994.
Fidelity's capital position has deteriorated significantly in recent periods.
As of March 31, 1994, Fidelity's tangible, core and risk-based capital ratios
were 4.00%, 4.04% and 9.10%, respectively, down from 4.12%, 4.16% and 9.34% at
December 31, 1993, and 4.27%, 4.35% and 9.76% at December 31, 1992. Although
Fidelity's capital levels at March 31, 1994, exceeded all currently applicable
minimum capital requirements and the Bank was deemed "adequately capitalized"
under the "prompt corrective action" regulations ( the "PCA") of the OTS as of
such date, absent the consummation of the Restructuring and Recapitalization
described in this Offering Circular, Fidelity's ratio of core capital to ad-
justed total assets at June 30, 1994, is expected to be below 4%. As a result,
Fidelity would be classified as "undercapitalized" under the PCA and subject to
significant additional regulatory restrictions and requirements. Accordingly,
management of the Bank has proposed the Restructuring and Recapitalization,
which is designed to dispose of substantially all of the Bank's NPAs as of
March 31, 1994, and to improve the capital of the Bank.
RESTRUCTURING
Bulk Sales
Prior to the Closing and except as described below, Fidelity will enter into
two or more definitive purchase and sale agreements (the "Bulk Sale Agree-
ments") pursuant to which Fidelity will sell to third parties (or, in the case
of certain assets, to Citadel) in two or more separate bulk sale transactions
(the "Bulk Sales") certain problem and other assets of the Bank (the "Bulk Sale
Assets") with an aggregate net book value as of March 31, 1994, of approxi-
mately $490 million, including substantially all of the Bank's NPAs.
The first Bulk Sale or series of Bulk Sales (collectively, the "Primary Bulk
Sale") is designed to dispose of assets with a net book value of approximately
$396 million at March 31, 1994, comprised of $170 million of NPAs (including
real estate acquired in settlement of loans, by foreclosure or otherwise
("REO")), $157 million of other criticized assets and $69 million of "pass" as-
sets (the "Primary Bulk Sale Assets"). See "Business - Internal Asset Classifi-
cations." As part of the Primary Bulk Sale, certain performing loans included
in the Primary Bulk Sales Assets with a net book value of approximately $100
million (the "REMIC Assets") may be sold to a real estate mortgage investment
conduit (a "REMIC") in connection with the private placement of securities of
the REMIC secured by such Primary Bulk Sale Assets (the "REMIC Transaction").
The entire interest in the REMIC would be sold in such private placement and,
accordingly, the Bank would not retain any residual interest in the REMIC.
4
<PAGE>
The second Bulk Sale or series of Bulk Sales (collectively, the "Secondary Bulk
Sale") is designed to dispose of assets with a net book value of approximately
$94 million at March 31, 1994, comprised of $87 million of NPAs (including
REO), $6 million of other criticized assets and $1 million of "pass" assets
(the "Secondary Bulk Sale Assets").
Each of the Bulk Sales, including the REMIC Transaction, is expected to be com-
pleted shortly after the Closing. However, no assurance can be given that the
Bulk Sales will be consummated or, if consummated, at what price. See "Risk
Factors-Certain Considerations Regarding the Restructuring and Recapitaliza-
tion-Consummation of the Bulk Sales" and "Restructuring and Recapitalization-
Restructuring-Bulk Sales."
Giving pro forma effect to the sale of all of the Bulk Sale Assets as of March
31, 1994, the Bank's NPAs would decrease from 6.5% of total assets to 0.5%. See
"Pro Forma Effect on the Bank" below.
Redemption of Subordinated Debt
The Bank is a party to a subordinated loan agreement (the "Subordinated Loan
Agreement") with four lenders under which the Bank issued $60 million principal
amount of subordinated notes (the "Subordinated Notes"). On March 4, 1994, the
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), one lender under the Subordinated Loan
Agreement, filed a lawsuit (the "Chase Lawsuit") against Fidelity, Citadel and
Citadel's Chairman of the Board in connection with the Bank's earlier planned
restructuring. Citadel and the Bank have entered into an agreement dated as of
June 3, 1994 (the "Settlement Agreement"), with the four lenders pursuant to
which, among other things, (i) the Chase Lawsuit has been dismissed with preju-
dice, and (ii) simultaneously with the Closing, the Bank will redeem the $60
million of Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to the unpaid princi-
pal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest (estimated to be approxi-
mately $1.2 million assuming that the Closing occurs on July 15, 1994), plus a
recapitalization fee (the "Recapitalization Fee"). See "Restructuring and Re-
capitalization - Restructuring - Redemption of Subordinated Debt."
Certain Affiliate Transfers
Finally, at or prior to the Closing, Citadel and the Bank will consummate a se-
ries of transactions (the "Affiliate Transfers"), the primary components of
which are as follows:
(1) the sale by Citadel to Fidelity of all of the outstanding capital stock of
Gateway for a purchase price of $1.0 million, payable in cash, which amount
is expected to approximate the book value of such capital stock as of June
30, 1994; and
(2) the transfer by way of a dividend by Fidelity to Citadel of two buildings
located in Glendale and Sherman Oaks, California, respectively, with an ag-
gregate net book value of approximately $9.3 million at March 31, 1994,
portions of which buildings will be leased back to Fidelity (the "Office
Buildings").
In addition, Fidelity is expected to sell certain of the Bulk Sale Assets to
Citadel.
See "Restructuring and Recapitalization-Restructuring-Certain Affiliate Trans-
fers." The REMIC Transaction, the other Bulk Sales (at the prices set forth in
the Bulk Sale Agreements), the redemption of the Subordinated Notes and the Af-
filiate Transfers are collectively referred to herein as the "Restructuring."
RECAPITALIZATION
General
The Bank plans to recapitalize the Bank through the sale of the 20,952,381
shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Class A Common
Stock"), and Class C Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Class C Common
Stock"), offered hereby and the reclassification of the Bank's currently out-
standing share of common stock, par value $0.01 (the "Existing Common Stock"),
into 6,595,624 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
("Class B Common Stock"), which number of shares may be reduced as described
below under "Closing Adjustments." The sale of the Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock offered hereby, together with such reclassification of the
Bank's Existing Common Stock, are collectively referred to herein as the "Re-
capitalization."
5
<PAGE>
The one outstanding share of Existing Common Stock currently is owned of record
by Citadel. Immediately prior to the completion of this offering, Fidelity will
amend its charter to provide for the Class A, Class B and Class C Common Stock
(collectively, the "Common Stock"). Upon the completion of this offering, the
purchasers of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock will
own all of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common
Stock, which will represent approximately 76.1% of the outstanding Common Stock
of the Bank, and Citadel will own all of the outstanding shares of Class B Com-
mon Stock, which will represent approximately 23.9% of the outstanding Common
Stock of the Bank, assuming 20,952,381 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class
C Common Stock are purchased in this offering and no closing adjustments as de-
scribed below are made. The offering of the shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock made hereby is contingent upon, among other things, the
sale of the 20,952,381 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock.
Closing Adjustments
The relative percentage interests referred to above of Citadel and the purchas-
ers of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock are based upon an Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity of the Bank (as defined below) as of June 30, 1994, of $86
million. If the Adjusted Stockholders' Equity of the Bank as of June 30, 1994,
varies from $86 million, certain adjustments will be made to the terms of the
Recapitalization as they apply to Citadel. If the Adjusted Stockholders' Equity
of the Bank is less than $86 million, the number of shares of Class B Common
Stock into which the Existing Common Stock will be reclassified will be reduced
so that the Bank's stockholders' equity per share of Common Stock upon consum-
mation of this offering equals the same amount it would have been if Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity had equaled $86 million. Conversely, if the Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity of the Bank exceeds $86 million, the Bank will be obli-
gated to pay to Citadel in cash the amount of such excess (the "Adjustment Pay-
ment").
"Adjusted Stockholders' Equity" of the Bank will be equal to the following:
(i) the unaudited stockholders' equity of the Bank as of June 30, 1994,
without giving effect to this offering, but adjusted (the "Restructuring
Adjustment") to give pro forma effect (including tax effects under gener-
ally accepted accounting principles) ("GAAP") to the Restructuring, re-
flecting the Bulk Sales, for the non-REMIC Assets, at the prices set forth
in the Bulk Sale Agreements, and, for the REMIC Assets, at the net gain or
loss to the Bank from the REMIC Transaction;
(ii) minus (plus) the amount by which the Bank's general valuation allow-
ance ("GVA") as of June 30, 1994, giving effect to the Restructuring Ad-
justment, is less than (or exceeds) the "Target GVA" (as defined below);
(iii) plus specific reserves established after the January 1994 Northridge
earthquake with respect to loans as to which the Bank agreed to defer the
due date of all or any portion of any monthly payments as a direct conse-
quence of such earthquake (the "Earthquake Accommodation Loans");
(iv) plus (minus) certain other adjustments (as further discussed below)
set forth in the Investors' Purchase Agreements to be entered into by pur-
chasers of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock (the "Investors'
Purchase Agreements");
(v) plus so much of the Branch Profit (as defined below) on the sale of the
Specified Branches (as defined below) as will not cause Adjusted Stockhold-
ers' Equity to exceed $86 million, provided that definitive purchase agree-
ments for such branches (the "Branch Purchase Agreements") are entered into
no later than August 15, 1994.
"Target GVA" means $58 million plus 20% of the amount, if any, by which the
Bank's "Adjusted NPAs" exceed $41 million. "Adjusted NPAs" means the sum of the
Bank's NPAs at June 30, 1994 (giving effect to the Restructuring Adjustment),
plus the outstanding amount of any Earthquake Accommodation Loans that are 30
days or more delinquent as of August 1, 1994 (pursuant to the related accommo-
dation agreements) and that are not already included in NPAs as of June 30,
1994 and not included in the Bulk Sale Assets, provided that, for purposes of
this calculation, NPAs and Adjusted NPAs will not include any loans in an iden-
tified pool of loans (the "Earthquake TDR Pool") with a net book value of ap-
proximately $26.5 million for which $8 million of the $58 million minimum Tar-
get GVA has been allocated. See "Northridge Earthquake" below. "Branch Profit"
means the net profit (after consideration of applicable taxes), if any,
6
<PAGE>
that the Bank would realize upon the sale of the Specified Branches for the
prices set forth in the Branch Purchase Agreements, determined in accordance
with GAAP. "Specified Branches" means branch properties and deposits of the
Bank, together with related cash, equipment and other assets.
Stockholders' equity as of June 30, 1994, will be determined with no signifi-
cant changes in the methods of accounting or the application of GAAP from those
that have been used in the past. In addition, substantially all expenses of the
Restructuring and Recapitalization other than the Placement Agency Fee and cer-
tain expenses incurred in connection with the Bulk Sales will be reflected as
expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 1994.
The determinations of the amount of proceeds to the Bank from the REMIC Trans-
action, the status of Earthquake Accommodation Loans at August 1, 1994 and the
Branch Profit will only be made after the Closing, and thus the final adjust-
ments to Adjusted Stockholders' Equity resulting from such determinations can-
not be made at the Closing. At the Closing, those factors will be estimated for
purposes of estimating Adjusted Stockholders' Equity and determining the appro-
priate number of shares of Class B Common Stock Citadel is to hold at the Clos-
ing. When the post-Closing determinations are made and Adjusted Stockholders'
Equity is calculated, an automatic post-Closing adjustment to the number of
outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock will be made pursuant to the exist-
ing Charter S of the Bank (the "Existing Charter") as it will be amended at the
Closing.
Adjusted Stockholders' Equity will not equal the Company's actual stockholders'
equity as of June 30, 1994. Such information will be used solely for the pur-
pose of determining the relative percentage interests of Citadel and the pur-
chasers of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby follow-
ing the Closing or the amount of the Adjustment Payment, as applicable. See
"Risk Factors - Certain Considerations Regarding the Restructuring and Recapi-
talization -Risks Relating to Determination of Adjusted Stockholders' Equity;
Conflicts of Interest" and "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Recapitaliza-
tion - Closing Adjustments."
CLOSING CONDITIONS
The Closing is contingent upon the satisfaction of various conditions, includ-
ing, without limitation, the following: (i) the existence of binding Bulk Sale
Agreements for the sale by Fidelity of the Bulk Sale Assets that will not be
sold in the REMIC Transaction, which sales are expected to occur shortly after
the Closing; (ii) the redemption of the Subordinated Notes and the dismissal of
the Chase Lawsuit; (iii) the consummation of each of the Affiliate Transfers;
(iv) the reclassification of the Existing Common Stock into shares of Class B
Common Stock and the amendment of the Existing Charter of the Bank to provide
for the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock; and (v) the approval of
the foregoing transactions by the OTS.
PRO FORMA EFFECT ON THE BANK
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank as of
March 31, 1994, (i) on an historical basis, (ii) on a pro forma basis giving
effect to the Recapitalization and the Restructuring other than the Secondary
Bulk Sale, and (iii) on a pro forma basis giving effect to the Recapitalization
and the Restructuring including the Secondary Bulk Sale.
The pro forma data shown below do not reflect the results of operations of the
Company since March 31, 1994, any changes in the amount or composition of the
Bank's assets since that date or any other changes. Accordingly, the pro forma
data shown below should not be construed as actual or projected as of any spe-
cific date. The Bank expects to incur a loss in the second quarter of 1994.
7
<PAGE>
For a description of the assumptions utilized in deriving the pro forma effect
on the Bank of the Restructuring and the Recapitalization, see "Unaudited Pro
Forma Consolidated Financial Information." There can be no assurances that the
Bulk Sales, including the REMIC Transaction, will be consummated or, if consum-
mated, that the Company's net proceeds from such transactions will be equal to
the $393 million assumed in the pro forma information herein. See "Risk Fac-
tors - Certain Considerations Regarding the Restructuring and Recapitaliza-
tion - Consummation of the Bulk Sales."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1994
--------------------------------------------
AS ADJUSTED FOR AS ADJUSTED FOR
RECAPITALIZATION RECAPITALIZATION
AND AND
RESTRUCTURING RESTRUCTURING
OTHER THAN INCLUDING
SECONDARY BULK SECONDARY BULK
HISTORICAL SALE SALE
---------- ---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming loans ("NPLs") $ 139,376 $ 64,402 $ 1,749
NPAs $ 265,963 $103,114 $17,999(1)
Classified Assets(2) $ 390,520 $147,505 $58,049(1)
Loan GVA $ 76,549 $ 61,595 $58,000
Ratio of NPAs to Total Assets 6.46% 2.70% 0.47%
Ratio of Classified Assets and
REO to Total Assets 9.48% 3.86% 1.53%
NPLs to Total Loans 3.93% 1.96% 0.05%
Tangible Capital to Adjusted
Total Assets(3) 4.00% 5.40% 5.08%
Core Capital to Adjusted Total
Assets(4) 4.04% 5.45% 5.12%
Core Capital to Risk-weighted
Assets(4) 5.98% 8.37% 7.89%(5)
Total Capital to Risk-weighted
Assets(4) 9.10% 9.61% 9.12%(5)
</TABLE>
(1) Includes approximately $6.1 million net book value of REO sold since March
31, 1994, and $2.4 million of REO currently in escrow and expected to be
sold in June or July 1994.
(2) See "Business - Internal Asset Classifications."
(3) As defined in the OTS's minimum capital regulations, 12 C.F.R. Part 567.
(4) As defined in the PCA, 12 C.F.R. Part 565.
(5) Upon the expiration of 60 days from the closing of the Bulk Sales, the Bank
will no longer be required to include $69 million of Bulk Sale Assets in
risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating the PCA. See "Restructur-
ing and Recapitalization - Restructuring - Bulk Sales." If such assets had
not been included in the risk-weighted assets as of March 31, 1994, the ra-
tios of core capital to risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-
weighted assets, as adjusted to give pro forma effect to the Restructuring
and Recapitalization as of such date, would have been 8.12% and 9.35%, re-
spectively.
NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE
In order to assist borrowers affected by the January 17, 1994 Northridge earth-
quake, the Bank developed several earthquake loan accommodation programs. The
OTS encouraged the development of such programs, which were designed to provide
relief to affected borrowers by deferring payments, capitalizing interest pay-
ments or making additional advances to borrowers to repair severely damaged
properties, while remaining consistent with the Bank's safe and sound business
practices. With respect to each request for earthquake relief, the Bank in-
spected the subject property to verify that the property sustained earthquake
damage, evaluated the credit history of the borrower and considered a number of
additional factors in order to develop an accommodation program suitable to the
particular borrower and affected property.
The Bank has identified 494 earthquake-affected loans warranting accommodation
negotiations with a total net book value of $253.2 million as of May 31, 1994.
8
<PAGE>
These loans are allocated into two pools. The first pool includes 438 loans
with a total net book value of approximately $226.7 million. As of May 31,
1994, loans in this first pool fell into three categories with respect to sta-
tus:
. 245 loans with a total net book value of approximately $103.9 million
which have signed accommodation agreements;
. 122 loans with a total net book value of approximately $74.2 million for
which accommodations have been approved and documented by the Bank, but
which documents have not yet been executed and returned to the Bank by
the borrowers; and
. 71 loans with a total net book value of approximately $48.6 million as
to which negotiations are underway and are expected to be completed in
the near future.
Of the loans in this first pool, $49.5 million involve accommodations that pro-
vide for a deferral or reduction of six or more monthly payments, which loans
currently will be categorized as troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") solely
due to the length of the accommodation period. Earthquake accommodations in
this pool require or will require the borrowers to make scheduled payments in
accordance with their respective accommodation terms by July 15, 1994; if such
loans are delinquent for 30 days or more on August 1, 1994, certain adjustments
will be made for the impact of that failure on the potential value of these
loans as described under "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Recapitaliza-
tion - Closing Adjustments" above.
The second pool, the Earthquake TDR Pool, consists of 56 loans with a total net
book value of approximately $26.5 million. Management believes that loans in
this pool may require TDR treatment and possibly specific reserves. Of the min-
imum Target GVA of $58 million, up to $8 million has been allocated for this
pool of 56 earthquake-affected loans.
Of the 494 earthquake-affected loans, 20 loans with a net book value of approx-
imately $36.9 million are included in the Bulk Sales.
RISK FACTORS
Investment in the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock involves a high
degree of risk. In deciding whether to purchase the Class A Common Stock or
Class C Common Stock offered hereby, potential investors should carefully con-
sider all of the matters described under "Risk Factors," including, among oth-
ers, the fact that the Bank will continue to be subject to regulatory capital
requirements and risks related to the business of the Bank, including recent
losses incurred, risks inherent in real estate lending activities, risks of de-
clining margins as a result of general economic conditions and other factors
and the effects of declining real estate values and other adverse economic con-
ditions in the Bank's markets.
9
<PAGE>
THE OFFERING
Class A Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock....................... 20,952,381 Shares
Class B Common Stock............... 6,595,624 Shares
Total Common Stock Outstanding af-
ter the Recapitalization (Assuming
No Reduction in the Number of
Shares of Class B Common Stock).... 27,548,005 Shares
Class A Common Stock............... The holders of Class A Common Stock are
entitled to one vote per share on all
matters requiring stockholder action. The
holders of Class A Common Stock have no
preemptive or other subscription rights
and there are no redemption or sinking
fund privileges applicable thereto. The
holders of Class A Common Stock are enti-
tled to receive dividends pari passu with
the holders of Class B Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock, out of funds le-
gally available therefor, subject to the
restrictions of the Bank's regulators and
the terms of any series of preferred
stock of the Bank. See "Risk Factors -
Certain Considerations Relating to the
Bank - Restrictions on Distributions."
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of the Bank, holders of Class A Common
Stock are entitled to share ratably and
pari passu with holders of Class B Common
Stock and the Class C Common Stock in all
assets remaining after payment of any li-
abilities of the Bank and payment of any
preferential amounts of which any class
of stock having preferences over the Com-
mon Stock is entitled. Purchasers of
Class A Common Stock are subject to cer-
tain restrictions on transfer. See "Re-
strictions on Transfer; No Public Market"
below.
Class C Common Stock............... The Class C Common Stock is identical to
the Class A Common Stock, except that
holders of Class C Common Stock have no
voting rights other than in connection
with any amendments to the charter of the
Bank that would adversely affect the vot-
ing, dividend or liquidation rights of
the Class C Common Stock, in which case
the holders of Class C Common Stock have
a separate class vote. Purchasers in this
offering that are subject to regulatory
restrictions on the ownership of voting
stock of thrifts may wish to purchase
shares of Class C Common Stock rather
than Class A Common Stock. In addition,
each share of Class C Common Stock is
convertible into one share of Class A
Common Stock upon certain transfers if
certain conditions are met. See "Descrip-
tion of Capital Stock." Purchasers of the
Class C Common Stock are subject to the
same transfer restrictions that apply to
purchasers of Class A Common Stock. See
"Restrictions on Transfer; No Public Mar-
ket" below.
10
<PAGE>
Class B Common Stock (initially The holders of Class B Common Stock are
held by Citadel)................... entitled to limited voting rights. Hold-
ers of Class B Common Stock will be per-
mitted to vote only with respect to (i)
any amendments to the charter of the Bank
that would adversely affect the voting,
dividend or liquidation rights of the
Class B Common Stock, in which case the
holders of Class B Common Stock will have
the right to vote as a separate class,
and (ii) a merger or consolidation of the
Bank or a sale or exchange of all or sub-
stantially all of the assets of the Bank
on which the holders of Class A Common
Stock have the right to vote, in which
event the holders of Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock will vote to-
gether as one class.
The Class B Common Stock is convertible
into shares of Class A Common Stock upon
the occurrence of certain events. In ad-
dition, the transfer of shares of Class B
Common Stock will be subject to certain
restrictions. Finally, for a period com-
mencing six months after the Closing and
ending 18 months after the Closing, Fi-
delity will have the right to redeem,
subject to the approval of the OTS and
certain other limitations, outstanding
shares of Class B Common Stock held by
Citadel and its affiliates. Holders of
Class B Common Stock will have certain
demand and piggyback registration rights.
See "Description of Capital Stock."
Use of Proceeds.................... The net proceeds from the sale of the
Class A Common Stock and Class C Common
Stock offered hereby, together with the
proceeds from the Bulk Sales (including
the REMIC Transaction), will be used to
repay (i) commercial paper of the Bank
($254 million outstanding as of March 31,
1994), (ii) $60 million principal amount
of Subordinated Notes plus accrued and
unpaid interest plus the Recapitalization
Fee and (iii) a portion of the Bank's
outstanding FHLB Advances. Any remaining
net proceeds will be used for general
corporate purposes. See "Use of Pro-
ceeds."
Investors' Purchase Agreement...... Prospective purchasers of the Class A
Common Stock or Class C Common Stock of-
fered hereby will be required to execute
and deliver to the Bank an Investors'
Purchase Agreement substantially in the
form of Annex A hereto. See "Plan of Dis-
tribution." Under the terms of the In-
vestors' Purchase Agreement, prospective
purchasers of Class A Common Stock or
Class C Common Stock will specify the
number of shares they agree to purchase
from the Bank. Such commitments will be
submitted to the Bank together with all
other commitments obtained by J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. (the "Placement Agent").
Each commitment under an executed Invest-
ors' Purchase Agreement will remain ir-
revocable until the earlier of (i) such
time as the Bank expressly rejects such
commitment and (ii) July , 1994.
11
<PAGE>
Plan of Distribution....... The Placement Agent has agreed, subject to the
terms and conditions of the agency agreement to
be entered into between the Placement Agent and
the Bank (the "Agency Agreement"), to act as
Placement Agent in connection with the sale of
the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock offered hereby. The Bank will termi-
nate this offering if it does not receive
subscriptions for 20,952,381 shares of Class A
Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered
hereby. This offering is being made on a "best
efforts" basis and will terminate no later than
, 1994. See "Plan of Distribution."
Restrictions on Transfer;
No Public Market........... Under the terms of the Investors' Purchase Agree-
ments, the shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock may not be transferred for a
period of 30 days from the Closing. In addition,
until the filing by the Bank of its annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994
(the "Form 10-K Filing Date"), which is expected
to be not later than March 31, 1995, the shares
of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock
may be transferred only in blocks of 100,000 or
more. During that time, the transfer agent will
refuse to issue stock certificates for fewer than
100,000 shares except where the transferor pro-
vides written certification that such smaller de-
nominations are being transferred only to the
beneficial ownership of an affiliate or affili-
ates of the transferor. After the Form 10-K Fil-
ing Date, all contractual minimum block size
transfer restrictions will be eliminated. See
"Description of Capital Stock." The Class A Com-
mon Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby
will not be listed on any securities exchange or
included on NASDAQ. It is anticipated that only a
very limited trading market, if any, will develop
in the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common
Stock. It is impossible to predict if and when
any active trading market in the Common Stock
will develop. See "Shares Eligible for Future
Sale; Transfer Restrictions."
Dividend Policy............ Fidelity's ability to pay dividends on its Common
Stock is limited by applicable law. In addition,
payment of dividends on the Bank's Common Stock
is subject to the discretion of its Board of Di-
rectors. Other than as discussed under "Certain
Federal Income Tax Considerations - Certain Af-
filiate Transfers and Closing Adjustments," Fi-
delity currently has no plans to pay dividends on
any of the Common Stock, and no assurances can be
given that Fidelity will pay any dividends in the
future. See "Dividend Policy."
Transfer Agent............. First Interstate Bank of California will be the
transfer agent for the Common Stock.
12
<PAGE>
SUMMARY HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents Summary Historical Consolidated Financial Data de-
rived from the audited and unaudited historical consolidated financial state-
ments of Fidelity and its subsidiaries, and should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in
this Offering Circular. In the opinion of management, such unaudited historical
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere herein reflect all mate-
rial adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary
for a fair presentation.
The consummation of the Restructuring and Recapitalization described herein is
expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated operations of the
Company following the Closing. Accordingly, the financial results of the Com-
pany following the Closing are expected to differ significantly from those of
the Bank and its subsidiaries prior to the Closing, and the financial results
of the Bank and its subsidiaries for periods prior to the Closing are not nec-
essarily indicative of the results of operations or financial condition for fu-
ture periods. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31,
1994, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations of Fidelity
and its subsidiaries for the full year.
13
<PAGE>
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------
AT OR FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
INCOME STATEMENT SUMMA-
RY:
Interest income $ 64,074 $ 78,187 $ 289,331 $ 370,715 $ 520,052
Interest expense 38,668 49,407 188,494 240,124 378,514
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Net interest income 25,406 28,780 100,837 130,591 141,538
Provision for estimated
loan losses 15,600 7,500 65,100 51,180 49,843
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Net interest income
after provision for
estimated loan losses 9,806 21,280 35,737 79,411 91,695
Noninterest income
(expense) (6,757) (1,116) (38,685) (6,247) 6,520
Operating expense 24,825 19,687 98,732 75,044 75,815
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Earnings (loss) before
income taxes (21,776) 477 (101,680) (1,880) 22,400
Income tax expense
(benefit) (7,625) 271 (35,793) (2,167) 14,296
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Net earnings (loss) $ (14,151) $ 206 $ (65,887) $ 287 $ 8,104
========== ========== ============ ============ ============
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets $4,114,508 $4,743,439 $4,383,979 $4,695,518 $5,123,835
Total loans, net 3,549,591 3,938,914 3,712,051 3,990,449 4,548,457
Deposits 3,171,306 3,292,936 3,368,664 3,459,648 3,885,861
FHLB Advances 342,700 471,400 326,400 581,400 325,000
Other indebtedness 354,000 634,117 407,830 327,000 531,150
Subordinated notes 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 75,000
Stockholders' equity 166,927 238,377 182,284 220,171 221,959
SELECTED OPERATING
RATIOS:
Return on average
assets (1.33)% 0.02% (1.44)% 0.01% 0.15%
Average equity divided
by average assets 4.09% 4.95% 4.40% 4.57% 4.03%
Ending equity divided
by ending assets 4.06% 5.03% 4.16% 4.69% 4.33%
Operating expenses to
average assets 1.85% 1.70% 2.16% 1.52% 1.37%
Efficiency ratio(1) 86.41% 61.56% 75.12% 45.38% 49.02%
ASSET QUALITY DATA:
NPAs(2) $ 265,963 $ 271,698 $ 235,621 $ 234,405 $ 124,725
NPAs to total assets 6.46% 5.72% 5.37% 4.99% 2.43%
Nonaccruing loans $ 139,376 $ 126,349 $ 93,475 $ 112,041 $ 68,982
Nonaccruing loans to
total loans 3.93% 3.23% 2.52% 2.83% 1.53%
GVA $ 85,073 $ 74,977 $ 80,020 $ 75,621 $ 52,374
GVA to NPAs(3) 30.99% 26.56% 32.79% 30.49% 41.99%
GVA to loans and REO
(including ISF)(4) 2.26% 1.81% 2.03% 1.82% 1.13%
Loan GVA to nonaccruing
loans and ISF 54.92% 40.47% 58.75% 38.15% 55.44%
OTHER DATA:
Cash dividends $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ -
Sales of Investment
products(5) $ 24,713 $ 36,487 $ 96,253 $ 77,078 $ 57,857
Number of:
Real estate loan
accounts (in
thousands) 15 18 16 18 21
Deposit accounts (in
thousands) 241 233 241 233 238
Retail branch
offices(6) 42 43 42 43 43
</TABLE>
(1) The efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense by net
interest income and noninterest income, excluding nonrecurring items, pro-
visions for estimated loan and real estate losses, direct costs of real es-
tate operations and gains/losses on the sale of securities.
(2) NPAs include nonaccruing loans, REO and ISF (net of REO GVA), but do not
include TDRs, unless they fall into one of the foregoing categories.
(3) NPAs in this ratio are calculated prior to the reduction for REO GVA.
(4) Loans and REO in the ratio are calculated prior to the reduction for loan
and REO GVA, but are net of specific reserves.
(5) Investment products are provided to customers of the Bank through Gateway.
Gateway was a subsidiary of the Bank until the fourth quarter of 1992 when
it became a subsidiary of Citadel.
(6) All retail branch offices are located in Southern California.
14
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
Investment in the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby
involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should consider careful-
ly, in addition to the other information contained in this Offering Circular,
the following risk factors before purchasing the Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock offered hereby.
CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE BANK
Recent Results of Operations
The Bank's recent results of operations reflect, in significant part, the
troubled California economy and real estate markets in which the Bank oper-
ates. California has been experiencing a severe recession characterized, among
other things, by high unemployment, declining business and real estate activi-
ty, declining real estate values and the absence of financing for certain mul-
ti-family and commercial real estate. This recession has caused loan delin-
quencies, defaults and foreclosures to rise, resulting in increases in the
Bank's NPAs and other problem assets and its allowance for estimated loan and
real estate losses, and adversely affecting the Bank's ability to meet the
regulatory capital ratios set forth in the PCA.
The Bank reported net losses of $65.9 million and net income of $0.3 million
and $8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respec-
tively, and reported net losses of $14.2 million for the first quarter of
1994. These results reflected significant additions to the Bank's allowance
for estimated loan and real estate losses during the periods. The adverse con-
ditions affecting the Bank's portfolio have continued in the second quarter of
1994 and, accordingly, the Bank expects to incur net losses for this period.
NPAs, as a percentage of total assets, increased from 2.43% at December 31,
1991, to 4.99% at December 31, 1992, to 5.37% at December 31, 1993, to 6.46%
at March 31, 1994.
Although Fidelity's capital levels at March 31, 1994, exceeded all currently
applicable minimum capital requirements and the Bank was deemed "adequately
capitalized" under the PCA as of such date, Fidelity's ratio of core capital
to adjusted total assets at June 30, 1994, is expected to be below 4% without
giving effect to the Restructuring and Recapitalization. If so, Fidelity would
be classified as "undercapitalized" under the PCA and subject to significant
additional regulatory restrictions and requirements. A further decline in real
estate values in California, the Bank's principal market area, or a worsening
or continuation of the current adverse economic conditions in that area, could
result in renewed increases in NPAs and other problem assets after the Re-
structuring and Recapitalization. This could, in turn, require the Bank to in-
crease its allowance for estimated loan and real estate losses in the future,
potentially resulting in further losses and adversely impacting the Bank's
ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and remain "adequately capi-
talized" under the PCA. See "Certain Considerations Regarding the Thrift In-
dustry - Changing Capital Requirements." Considerable uncertainty exists as to
the future trends in the California real estate markets and economy.
New Management
The success of the Company's new business strategy and its operating results
following the Restructuring and the Recapitalization will depend upon the ef-
forts of a new management team. Senior management of the Bank is, in large
part, new to the Bank. On June 3, 1992, Richard M. Greenwood became the Chief
Executive Officer and President of Citadel, and the Chairman of the Board of
Fidelity, after serving as Chief Financial Officer of CalFed Inc. and Califor-
nia Federal Bank during the prior two years. In September 1993, Robert Condon
joined Gateway as President and Chief Executive Officer, after serving for
three years in a similar capacity at CalFed Investment Services. In January
1994, James Stutz joined the Bank as Executive Vice President of the Retail
Banking Group after 22 years with HomeFed Corporation. While many members of
senior management have significant experience in the operations of a thrift at
other institutions, management has only a limited track record in those activ-
ities at the Bank.
The loss of any member of senior management could have a material adverse im-
pact on the Company. In addition, three management positions, the Chief Finan-
cial Officer, the head of mortgage banking and the Chief Credit Officer, have
not been filled. No member of the executive management team other than Mr.
Greenwood has an employment agreement with the Bank.
15
<PAGE>
Business Strategy
Since new senior management was hired beginning in 1992, the Bank has broad-
ened the product line of loans originated by the Bank and increased its empha-
sis on mortgage banking and single family originations, in particular develop-
ing its loan pipeline hedging capability. The Bank also reorganized the retail
branch system to integrate the provision of traditional banking services with
the provision through Gateway of a broader range of nontraditional financial
services and uninsured investment products. In addition, management has begun
to implement stricter credit controls and credit reviews. Finally, Fidelity
undertook analyses of its management of control, staffing levels and in-house
staff functions. These analyses identified substantial cost-reduction opportu-
nities via consolidation of redundant functions, reduction in management and
staffing levels, closing, consolidating and selling of certain branches and
out-sourcing of certain staff functions, which management expects to pursue.
See "Business - Retail Financial Services Group," " - Mortgage Banking Group
Operations," " - Credit Administration - Loan Monitoring" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Three Months Ended March 31, 1994 Compared with Three Months Ended December
31, 1993 and March 31, 1993 - Operating Expenses." However, there can be no
assurance that all aspects of management's business strategy can be imple-
mented or, if implemented, that such business strategy will be successful. In
addition, effective immediately prior to the Closing, a new Board of Directors
of Fidelity will be elected by Citadel. There can be no assurance that such
new Board will continue to pursue management's business strategy outlined
herein.
Adequacy of General Valuation Allowance
The Bank establishes valuation allowances for estimated losses on specific
loans and real estate classified in whole or in part as "loss" ("specific re-
serves" or "specific loss reserves") and for the inherent risk in the loan and
real estate portfolios which has yet to be specifically identified ("general
valuation allowances" or "GVA"). The total allowance for estimated loan and
real estate losses consists of the sum of the GVA and all specific loss re-
serves.
The Bank had NPAs totaling $236 million, $234 million and $125 million, re-
spectively, at December 31, 1993, 1992, and 1991, and $266 million at the end
of the first quarter of 1994. Classified assets increased from $228.4 million
at December 31, 1991, to $353.7 million at December 31, 1992 to $372.5 million
at December 31, 1993, and were at $390.5 million at March 31, 1994. TDRs de-
clined by $58.6 million in 1993 to $28.7 million as of December 31, 1993 com-
pared to $87.3 million at December 31, 1992 and $6.9 million at December 31,
1991, while TDRs totaled $33.8 million at March 31, 1994. The Bank had GVAs of
$80.0 million, $75.6 million and $52.4 million at December 31, 1993, 1992, and
1991, and $85.1 million at the end of the first quarter of 1994.
The establishment of the GVA is highly subjective and involves numerous esti-
mates and assumptions. The internal asset review department reviews the qual-
ity and recoverability of the Bank's assets on a quarterly basis, in order to
establish adequate specific reserves and general valuation allowances. The
Bank utilizes the delinquency migration and the classification methods in de-
termining the adequacy of its GVA. The delinquency migration method attempts
to capture the potential future losses as of a particular date associated with
a given portfolio of loans, based on the Bank's own historical migration expe-
rience over a given period of time. Under the classification method, a reserve
factor is applied to each aggregate classification level by asset collateral
type in an effort to estimate the loss content in the portfolio. The Bank cal-
culates a range of loss by applying both methodologies and then applies judg-
ment and knowledge of particular credits, economic trends, industry experience
and other relevant factors to estimate the GVA amount. Additions to the allow-
ances, in the form of provisions, are reflected in current operations. Charge-
offs to the allowances are made when the loss is determined to be significant
and permanent.
As explained above, the amount of the Bank's GVA represents management's esti-
mate of the amount of loan and real estate losses likely to be incurred by the
Bank, based upon various assumptions as to future economic and other condi-
tions. As such, GVA does not represent the amount of such losses that could be
incurred under adverse conditions that management does not consider to be the
most likely to arise. In addition, management's classification of assets and
evaluation of the adequacy of the GVA is an ongoing process. Consequently,
there can be no assurance that material additions to Fidelity's GVA will not
be required after the Restructuring and the Recapitalization, thereby ad-
versely affecting earnings and the Company's ability to maintain and build
capital. If the trends discussed above and under "Certain Considerations
Regard-
16
<PAGE>
ing the Thrift Industry-Exposure to Economic Trends and Real Estate Markets"
continue, and the amount of Fidelity's NPAs increases, the Bank is likely to
need to increase further such reserves.
Concentration in Multifamily Loans
Approximately 72.4% of Fidelity's loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by
multifamily residential properties at March 31, 1994. Although management be-
lieves this portfolio is less sensitive to the effects of the recession than
those of institutions which have emphasized commercial and/or construction
lending, it may be more sensitive than the portfolios of institutions which
have placed greater emphasis on single family residential lending. At March
31, 1994, Fidelity's mortgage loan portfolio consisted of: $693.8 million
(19.0%) single family units; $439.4 million (12.1%) multifamily 2 to 4 units;
$1,793.2 million (49.2%) multifamily 5 to 36 units; $414.5 million (11.4%)
multifamily 37 units or greater; and $304.1 million (8.3%) commercial and in-
dustrial. Delinquent loans in those categories represented 6.7%, 6.2%, 10.4%,
22.2%, and 8.0%, respectively, at March 31, 1994. Although the Bulk Sale As-
sets include a significant number of multifamily loan assets, on a pro forma
basis giving effect to the Restructuring as of March 31, 1994, 76.1% of the
Bank's loan portfolio would consist of loans secured by multifamily resi-
dences.
In recent periods, the Bank has experienced increasing delinquency rates in
its multifamily portfolio reflecting, among other things, (i) increasing va-
cancy rates (which can adversely affect the Bank's risk weighting of loans on
multifamily properties of 5 to 36 units and borrowers' debt coverage ratios);
(ii) decreasing apartment rental rates; (iii) the potentially greater willing-
ness of investors to abandon such properties or seek bankruptcy protection,
particularly where such properties are experiencing negative cash flow and the
loans are not cross-collateralized by other performing properties; (iv) the
substantial decreases in the market value of multifamily properties experi-
enced in recent periods (resulting, in many cases, in appraised values less
than the outstanding loan balances) and the general illiquidity of such prop-
erties at the current time in Southern California; and (v) the comparative il-
liquidity of multifamily residential mortgages, given the limited secondary
market for such mortgages.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Prevailing economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates,
as well as governmental policies and regulations concerning, among other
things, monetary and fiscal affairs, significantly affect interest rates and a
savings institution's net interest income. The results of operations of the
Bank depend to a large extent on net interest income, which is the difference
between interest the Bank receives from its loans, securities and other assets
and the interest expense the Bank pays on its deposits and other liabilities.
Fidelity actively manages its assets and liabilities in an effort to mitigate
its exposure to interest rate risk, but it cannot eliminate this exposure en-
tirely without unduly affecting its profitability. As is the case with many
thrift institutions, Fidelity's deposits historically have matured or repriced
more rapidly than its loans and other investments, and consequently, increases
in market interest rates have tended to reduce Fidelity's net interest income,
while decreases in market interest rates have tended to increase its net in-
terest income.
As a part of its asset liability management strategy, Fidelity has emphasized
the origination of adjustable rate mortgage ("ARM") loans. At March 31, 1994,
approximately 96.1% of Fidelity's total loan portfolio consisted of loans
which mature or reprice within one year, compared with approximately 95.8% at
December 31, 1993 and approximately 96.5% at December 31, 1992. Until early
1994, Fidelity benefited from the fact that decreases in the interest rates
accruing on Fidelity's ARM loans lagged behind the decreases in interest rates
accruing on its deposits. If more recent trends of increasing interest rates
continue, Fidelity's net interest income may suffer as a result.
OTS Examinations
In January 1994, the Bank received reports of the various regular examinations
conducted by the OTS in 1993. The OTS expressed concern in a number of spe-
cific areas principally relating to asset quality, asset review administration
and the resulting negative impact on capital levels and earnings, as well as
management effectiveness in certain areas. As a result of the findings of the
OTS in its safety and soundness examination of the Bank, Fidelity is subject
to higher examination assessments and is subject to additional regulatory re-
strictions including, but not limited to, (a) a prohibition, absent prior OTS
approval, on increases in total assets during any quarter in excess of an
amount equal to net interest credited on deposit liabilities during the quar-
ter; (b) a requirement that the Bank submit to the OTS for prior review and
approval the
17
<PAGE>
names of proposed new directors and executive officers and proposed employment
contracts with any director or senior officer; (c) a requirement that the Bank
submit to the OTS for prior review and approval any third-party contract out-
side the normal course of business; and (d) the ability of the OTS, in its dis-
cretion, to require 30 days' prior notice of all transactions between Fidelity
and its affiliates (including Citadel and Gateway).
Management believes that Fidelity will cease to be subject to the foregoing re-
strictions after consummation of the Restructuring and Recapitalization and
that these transactions, together with other actions taken by management in re-
sponse to the concerns raised by the OTS in its 1993 report, will be responsive
to most of the concerns of the OTS. However, such restrictions will not auto-
matically be removed by the OTS and there can be no assurance as to whether or
when the OTS will remove such restrictions. In addition, the Restructuring does
not significantly alleviate the OTS's concerns regarding the concentration of
Fidelity's loan portfolio in multifamily loans and certain unfilled officer po-
sitions. See "Concentration in Multifamily Loans" and "New Management." Thus,
the OTS or the FDIC may require the Bank to address such (or any new) concerns
in the future.
Restrictions on Distributions
Fidelity's ability to pay dividends on its Common Stock is limited by applica-
ble law. OTS regulations of general application impose limits upon certain cap-
ital distributions by savings institutions, including cash dividends, payments
to repurchase or otherwise to acquire an institution's shares, payments to
stockholders of another institution in a cash-out merger and other distribu-
tions charged against capital. Because cash dividends reduce the regulatory
capital of the Bank, and because of the regulatory restrictions described
above, it is unlikely that the Bank will pay cash dividends on the Common Stock
in the foreseeable future. In addition, as described below under "Description
of Capital Stock - Amended Charter of the Bank - Class B Common Stock," Fidel-
ity has the option to acquire certain Class B Common Stock during certain peri-
ods. The exercise of any such option will be subject to the foregoing regula-
tory limits.
Legal Proceedings
The Bank is involved as a defendant in certain legal proceedings incidental to
its business. The Bank believes that the outcome of these legal proceedings
will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition or opera-
tions. However, there can be no assurance in this regard. In addition, the Bank
is named in certain legal proceedings that are in the very early stages and the
Bank therefore does not yet have sufficient information to form a view with re-
spect to the probable outcome or any potential exposure. See "Business - Legal
Proceedings."
CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE THRIFT INDUSTRY
Financial Institution Regulation
Federal laws and regulations subject Fidelity to extensive regulation and su-
pervision which is intended primarily for the benefit of Fidelity's depositors
and the FDIC. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing financial
institutions such as Fidelity are frequently raised in Congress and state leg-
islatures and before the OTS, the FDIC and other regulatory agencies.
Changes in legislation and regulatory policy have materially affected the busi-
ness of Fidelity and other financial institutions in the past and are likely to
do so in the future. Regulations now affecting Fidelity may be changed at any
time and the interpretation of these regulations by the regulatory authorities
and examiners is also subject to change. There can be no assurance that future
changes in the regulations or their interpretation will not adversely affect
the business of Fidelity. Future legislation and regulatory policy could also
alter the structures and competitive relationships among financial institu-
tions. Federal and state regulatory authorities also have the power in certain
circumstances to prohibit or limit the payment of dividends to holders of Com-
mon Stock of Fidelity. In addition, certain regulatory actions, including gen-
eral increases in federal deposit insurance premiums or the application of the
risk-based insurance premium system to Fidelity, may increase Fidelity's oper-
ating expenses in future periods.
Changing Capital Requirements
The minimum capital requirements applicable to savings associations, such as
Fidelity, were significantly increased by the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"). Under FIRREA, as implemented
to date by the OTS, thrifts are required to maintain ratios of tangible capital
to adjusted total assets (as defined in the
18
<PAGE>
regulations) of at least 1.5%, core capital to adjusted total assets (as de-
fined in the regulations) of at least 3% and total capital to risk-weighted
assets (as defined in the regulations) of at least 8%.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA")
among other things required the OTS and other bank regulatory agencies to im-
plement a "prompt corrective action" regulation that increased the mandatory
sanctions imposed on institutions deemed to be undercapitalized. The PCA is
based on a set of capital ratios established by the OTS, which are similar to
the FIRREA capital requirements but, in certain cases, higher. Under the PCA,
an institution is adequately capitalized (and, therefore, not "undercapital-
ized") if (1) its ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets (as defined
in the regulations) is at least 4%, (2) its ratio of core capital to risk-
weighted assets (as defined in the regulations) is at least 4%, and (3) its
ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations)
is at least 8%. An institution is treated as "well capitalized" if its core
capital to adjusted total assets ratio is at least 5%, its core capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio is at least 6%, and its total capital to risk-
weighted assets ratio is at least 10% and no OTS order or directive requiring
higher capital ratios is then in effect. While the Bank's capital ratios under
the PCA would improve giving effect to the Restructuring and Recapitalization
on a pro forma basis as of March 31, 1994, there can be no assurances that Fi-
delity will not become undercapitalized in the future.
The OTS also has the authority to establish, for individual thrifts, an indi-
vidual minimum capital requirement ("IMCR") in excess of the standard require-
ment upon a determination by the OTS that such an IMCR is necessary or appro-
priate in light of such thrift's particular circumstances. For example, the
OTS may determine that an IMCR is appropriate if, among other things, the OTS
believes that an institution (i) has a high degree of exposure to interest
rate risk or credit risk, (ii) may be adversely affected by the operation or
condition of its holding company, (iii) has a portfolio reflecting weak credit
quality or a significant likelihood of financial loss, or (iv) has inadequate
underwriting standards or procedures. If the OTS determines that an IMCR
should be imposed on an institution, the institution has an opportunity to
submit a response to the OTS, but may have no opportunity for judicial review
of an IMCR. If an institution fails to meet either the standard minimum capi-
tal requirements or any IMCR that may be imposed on it, it will become subject
to a number of sanctions.
Pursuant to statutory requirements, the OTS issued a proposed rule on November
18, 1993, that prescribes certain "safety and soundness standards." The pro-
posed regulations would require an institution to submit a compliance plan and
would permit the OTS to issue an order requiring corrective action if, among
other things, a savings institution has classified assets that exceed the sum
of its total capital and ineligible allowances. The Bank did not meet this
test at March 31, 1994, but expects to meet this test upon the consummation of
the Restructuring and Recapitalization.
Although Fidelity is not currently, and following the consummation of the Re-
structuring and Recapitalization is not expected to be, subject to a capital
restoration plan, IMCR, capital directive or cease and desist order, the
Bank's failure to meet its regulatory capital requirements would provide
grounds for one or more of the following actions, depending on the severity of
the violation: a requirement that the Bank file a capital restoration plan, a
requirement that the Bank take additional actions to comply with the capital
restoration plan, the issuance of a cease and desist order, the issuance of a
capital directive, the imposition of civil money penalties on the Bank and
certain affiliated parties, the imposition of such operating restrictions as
the OTS deems appropriate at the time, such other actions by the OTS as it may
be authorized or required to take under applicable statutes and regulations
and, under certain circumstances, the appointment of a conservator or receiver
for the Bank. In the event of a liquidation of the Bank, the interests of the
holders of the Common Stock will be subordinate to the interests of, among
others, creditors of the Banks, including depositors. Historically, with few
exceptions, equity holders of financial institutions such as the Bank have not
obtained any recovery for their investment following the appointment of a con-
servator or receiver.
Exposure to Economic Trends and Real Estate Markets
The thrift industry is exposed to economic trends and fluctuations in real es-
tate values. In recent periods, those trends have been recessionary in nature,
particularly in Southern California. Accordingly, the trends have adversely
affected both the delinquencies being experienced by thrifts such as Fidelity
and the ability of such institutions to recoup principal and accrued interest
by realization upon underlying collateral. No assurances can be given that
such trends will not continue in future periods creating increasing downward
pressure on the capital and earnings of thrift institutions.
Fidelity's principal lending area, Southern California, is experiencing its
worst economic recession since the 1930's. The economic environment in South-
ern California has been characterized by, among other things, high unemploy-
ment, declining business and real estate activity and declining real estate
values. This recession has caused loan delinquencies,
19
<PAGE>
defaults and foreclosures to rise, resulting in an increase in nonperforming
assets, restructured loans, classified assets and potential problem loans, an
increase in loan and real estate loss provisions, an increase in other real es-
tate owned and in-substance foreclosures and a decline in income.
Further declines in real estate values in Southern California or a worsening or
a continuation for longer than expected of current economic conditions or the
economic impacts of acts of nature such as fires, flooding and earthquakes in
Southern California could result in higher charge-offs, increased foreclosures,
other real estate owned and nonperforming assets and require Fidelity to in-
crease materially its provisions for loan and real estate losses, could result
in further significant losses and could have a material adverse effect on
Fidelity's ability to meet regulatory capital requirements. A continuation of
poor economic conditions or further decline could also have an adverse impact
on management's plan to increase sales of investment products.
Evolving Competition
Financial institutions operate in a competitive environment. Fidelity competes
with commercial banks, other savings institutions, finance companies, retail
investment brokerage houses, money market funds, credit unions, mortgage banks
and other financial intermediaries, many of which have substantially greater
resources and capital than Fidelity. Particularly intense competition exists
for sources of funds, loans, investment products and other services that Fidel-
ity offers. Fidelity's business strategy contemplates an increase in the volume
of single family mortgage loan originations. While management believes Fidelity
will be able to increase substantially loan origination volume of single family
mortgages, there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so since mort-
gage loan originations are very competitive in nature and dependent in large
part upon prevailing economic conditions, interest rates and other factors be-
yond the control of Fidelity.
Fidelity's business strategy further contemplates a significant expansion of
its sales of investment products and services through Fidelity's retail branch
network. Although a management team with experience in growing mutual fund and
annuity sales in banks was hired and has been training the sales force for over
a year, there are a large number of banks, other financial institutions, mutual
funds and other financial intermediaries active or about to enter this market
and competition is fierce. Thus, there can be no assurance that this strategy
can be implemented successfully.
In addition, management believes that the traditional role of thrift institu-
tions, such as Fidelity, as the nation's primary housing lenders has dimin-
ished, and that thrift institutions are subject to increasing competition from
commercial banks, mortgage bankers and others for both depositor funds and
lending opportunities. In addition, with assets of approximately $3.8 billion
as of March 31, 1994, giving effect to the Restructuring, Fidelity will face
competition from a number of substantially larger and, in some cases, better
capitalized thrifts. The ability of thrift institutions, such as Fidelity, to
compete by diversifying into lending activities other than real estate lending
(and residential real estate lending in particular) is limited by law.
Environmental Risk
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, a
current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the
costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances on, under or in such
property. In addition, any person or entity who arranges for the disposal or
treatment of hazardous substances may also be liable for the costs of removal
or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility.
Such laws and regulations often impose liability regardless of fault and lia-
bility has been interpreted to be joint and several unless the harm is divisi-
ble and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility. Pursuant
to these laws and regulations, under certain circumstances, a lender may become
liable for the environmental liabilities in connection with its borrowers'
properties, if, among other things, it either forecloses or participates in the
management of its borrowers' operations or hazardous substance handling or dis-
posal practices. Although the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA") and certain state counterparts pro-
vide exemptions for secured lenders, the scope of such exemptions is limited
and a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency clarifying such exemp-
tion under CERCLA has recently been held invalid. In addition, CERCLA and cer-
tain state counterparts impose a statutory lien, which may be prior to the
Bank's interest securing a loan, for certain costs incurred in connection with
removal or remediation of hazardous substances. Others laws and regulations may
also require the removal or remediation of hazardous substances located on a
property before such property may be sold or transferred.
It is the Bank's current policy to identify and review certain environmental
issues pertaining to its borrowers and the properties securing the loans of its
borrowers prior to making any loan and foreclosing on property. If such review
revealed
20
<PAGE>
any environmental issues, a Phase I environmental audit (which generally in-
volves a physical inspection without any sampling) and under certain circum-
stances, a Phase II environmental audit (which generally involves sampling) may
be conducted by an independent environmental consultant. It is also the Bank's
current policy with respect to loans secured by residential property with five
or more units to automatically conduct a Phase I environmental audit prior to
foreclosing on such property. There can be no assurances that such review,
Phase I environmental audits or Phase II environmental audits have identified
or will identify all potential environmental liabilities that may exist with
respect to a foreclosed property or a property securing any loan or that his-
torical, current or future uses of such property or surrounding properties will
not result in the imposition of environmental liability on the Bank.
The Bank is aware that certain of its current or former properties on which it
has foreclosed and properties securing loans contain contamination or hazardous
substances, including asbestos and lead paint. Under certain circumstances, the
Bank may be required to remove or remediate such contamination or hazardous
substances. Although the Bank is not aware of any environmental liability re-
lating to these properties that it believes would have a material adverse ef-
fect on its business or results of operations, there can be no assurances that
the costs of any required removal or remediation would not be material or sub-
stantially exceed the value of affected properties or the loans secured by the
properties or that the Bank's ability to sell any foreclosed property would not
be adversely affected.
Risk of Ownership and Operation of Real Property
The Bank intends to divest itself of substantially all of its REO through the
Bulk Sale Agreements and certain transfers to Citadel. To the extent that any
of the REO properties are not so sold or are repurchased, and to the extent
that real property is foreclosed upon in the future, the ownership and opera-
tion of real property is subject to certain inherent risks. These risks in-
clude, without limitation, the inability or failure to insure for all losses,
including because the losses are uninsurable or are not insurable economically
(such as earthquake risk); existing or future changes in zoning and other land
use regulations; enforcement and compliance with regulatory requirements, such
as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of
1988; environmental liability, as described above; liability of landowners for
defective or dangerous conditions, including, without limitation, strict lia-
bility of landlords of residential real property in certain circumstances; as
well as fluctuations in market conditions affecting the value of the real prop-
erty, including, without limitation, competition for tenants and changes in
market rental rates.
CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE RESTRUCTURING AND RECAPITALIZATION
Consummation of the Bulk Sales
As part of the Restructuring, Fidelity will sell to third parties (or, in the
case of certain assets, to Citadel) certain problem and other assets of the
Bank with an aggregate net book value of approximately $490 million as of March
31, 1994, including substantially all of the Bank's NPAs as of such date. Ap-
proximately $390 million of such assets will be sold pursuant to two or more
Bulk Sale Agreements to be entered into prior to the Closing. The remaining
portion of such assets may be sold in the REMIC Transaction.
The Bulk Sale Agreements are expected to be binding on the purchasers thereun-
der and are expected to require the purchasers to deposit 10% of the purchase
price into escrow prior to the Closing. However, the Bulk Sale Agreements may
limit any damages that Fidelity may be able to recover for any breach by the
purchasers to the amount of such deposit. In addition, such agreements specify
a number of conditions to the obligations of the purchasers thereunder to con-
summate the Bulk Sales contemplated thereby. These conditions include that cer-
tain representations and warranties regarding the Bulk Sale Assets subject to
such agreements are true and correct as of the closing thereunder. In addition,
the agreements relating to the sale of the assets to the REMIC and the sale of
the securities by the REMIC in the private placement (collectively, the "REMIC
Agreements"), which will not have been entered into at the time of the Closing,
are also expected to contain a number of closing conditions, including condi-
tions that the representations and warranties regarding the assets to be sold
to the REMIC by the Bank are true and correct as of the closing thereunder, and
that certain opinions of counsel be delivered. Although the Bank believes that
such representations and warranties in the Bulk Sale Agreements and the REMIC
Agreements will be true and correct as of the closings thereunder and that it
will be able to satisfy all other closing conditions under such Agreements, the
relevant circumstances could change between the date hereof and the closing un-
der such agreements. Consequently, no assurances can be given that the Bulk
Sales or the REMIC Transaction, individually or collectively, will be success-
fully completed.
21
<PAGE>
In addition, in the event that representations and warranties of the Bank in
the Bulk Sale Agreements are discovered to be untrue within a period ranging
from 60 to 180 days after the closing under the applicable agreement, the Bank
at its option will have the right to cure the related problem or to repurchase
the assets as to which such representations and warranties were untrue. The
REMIC Agreements are expected to include similar provisions. Citadel will be
required to reimburse the Bank for certain losses incurred by the Bank in ei-
ther curing such problem or repurchasing such asset, subject to a $4 million
aggregate limit. See "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Restructuring - Bulk
Sales." As of March 31, 1994, Citadel had liquid assets of $0.9 million and it
is expected to incur losses during the second quarter of 1994. Although Citadel
has advised the Bank that an affiliate will make available to it prior to the
Closing a credit line under which $2 million will be available to fund Cita-
del's reimbursement obligation, there can be no assurance that Citadel will be
able to make such reimbursement payments.
With respect to the REMIC Transaction, at the time of the Closing, the Bank
will not have entered into a definitive agreement with respect to the sale of
the REMIC Assets to the REMIC nor is it expected that the REMIC will have en-
tered into a definitive agreement with respect to the sale of the securities to
be issued by it in the private placement. There are no assurances that the se-
curities of the REMIC will be successfully sold. The sale of the securities of
the REMIC is subject to a variety of factors, including market conditions, many
of which are outside of the control of the Bank. Since the net proceeds from
the sale of the securities by the REMIC in the private placement will be used
by the REMIC to purchase the assets from the Bank, the sale of the REMIC Assets
is contingent upon the successful completion of the sale of the REMIC securi-
ties. There is no assurance that the sale of securities by the REMIC will be
consummated. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Bank will be able to
sell the REMIC Assets to the REMIC or, if such sale occurs, that the Bank will
receive proceeds on such sale in the amount assumed in the pro forma financial
information contained in this Offering Circular.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information contained in this
Offering Circular assumes net proceeds from the Bulk Sales (including the REMIC
Transaction) of $393 million in the aggregate. However, no assurances can be
given that net proceeds in such amount will be obtained.
While a condition to the Closing is that the Bank will have entered into bind-
ing Bulk Sale Agreements with respect to Bulk Sale Assets other than the REMIC
Assets, if for any reason such Bulk Sales are not consummated, either individu-
ally or in the aggregate, the Bulk Sale Assets not sold will continue to be
owned by the Bank. While such Bulk Sale Assets, which constitute substantially
all of the Bank's NPAs as of March 31, 1994, may have been written down to
their estimated disposition value which would approximate estimated fair market
value at June 30, 1994, should such Bulk Sales not be consummated the Bank may
be subject to further losses on such Assets and would continue to incur operat-
ing expenses relating to the management of those assets until such time as they
are sold, which could have a material adverse effect in the Bank's financial
condition and results of operations following the Closing. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
While this offering taken alone will improve the Bank's capital ratios under
the PCA, such capital ratios would be significantly lower than those set forth
in the pro forma financial information included in this Offering Circular which
assume the consummation of such Bulk Sales. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Consoli-
dated Financial Information." As noted above, however, the Bank believes that
it will be able to satisfy all of the closing conditions under the Bulk Sales
Agreement. While no REMIC Agreements are expected to be executed prior to the
Closing, the assets to be sold to the REMIC currently constitute performing
loans. Accordingly, while such assets would continue to be owned by the Bank if
the REMIC Transaction is not consummated for any reason, the failure to consum-
mate such transaction is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Bank's financial condition or results of operations following the Closing. How-
ever, the Bank would be subject to potential losses on such assets and would
continue to incur operating costs related to the management of such assets.
Risks Relating to Determination of Adjusted Stockholders' Equity; Conflicts of
Interest
Pursuant to the adjustment mechanism described under "Restructuring and Recapi-
talization - Recapitalization - Closing Adjustments," the respective percent-
age interests in the Bank of purchasers of Class A Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock, on the one hand, and Citadel, as the initial holder of Class B
Common Stock, on the other hand, are adjusted if the Adjusted Stockholders' Eq-
uity (as defined) of the Bank as of June 30, 1994 (after giving effect to the
Restructuring), is less than $86 million (before giving effect to this offer-
ing). Such adjustment will reduce the number of
22
<PAGE>
shares of Class B Common Stock received by Citadel in the Recapitalization to a
number so that the Bank's stockholders' equity per share of Common Stock upon
consummation of this offering equals the same amount it would have been if Ad-
justed Stockholders' Equity had equaled $86 million. Conversely, if the Ad-
justed Stockholders' Equity exceeds $86 million, the Bank will be obligated to
pay to Citadel the Adjustment Payment. In order to determine Adjusted Stock-
holders' Equity, certain adjustments will be made to the Bank's consolidated
financial statements at and for the six months ended June 30, 1994. The adjust-
ments will reflect, among other things, certain assumed levels of NPAs and GVAs
as of such date, whether or not actual NPAs or GVAs, as reflected in the ac-
counting records of the Bank as of such date, exceed these assumed amounts and
the outstanding amount of any Earthquake Accommodation Loans not already in-
cluded in NPAs as of June 30, 1994, that are 30 days or more delinquent pursu-
ant to the related accommodation agreements as of August 1, 1994. See "Restruc-
turing and Recapitalization - Recapitalization - Closing Adjustments."
Adjusted Stockholders' Equity will be calculated based on the prices for the
Bulk Sale Assets set forth in the Bulk Sale Agreements, and, therefore, if the
Bulk Sales are not consummated or are consummated at different prices, there
will be no adjustment to Adjusted Stockholders' Equity or the number of out-
standing shares of Class B Common Stock. However, although the Adjusted Stock-
holders' Equity to be used in making preliminary adjustments at the Closing
will be based on assumed net proceeds from the REMIC Transaction, the Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity to be used for purposes of the final adjustment calcula-
tions will be based on the actual amount received by the Bank from the sale of
the REMIC Assets in the REMIC Transaction.
As noted above, Adjusted Stockholders' Equity is based on the Bank's consoli-
dated financial statements at and for the six months ended June 30, 1994. Such
financial statements and the adjustments thereto described above will not be
audited. Furthermore, purchasers of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common
Stock will not have any right to cause an audit to be undertaken with respect
to the June 30 financial statements or adjustments or the determination as to
the number of shares of Class B Common Stock to be received by Citadel or the
amount of any Adjustment Payment to Citadel. If an audit were to be made with
respect to the June 30, 1994 financial statements or adjustments, it is possi-
ble that such audit would result in a change to the Bank's net loss for such
six month period or in the amount of stockholders' equity atJune 30, 1994 or in
such adjustments. In addition, the audit to be made with respect to the year
ended December 31, 1994, could reveal matters which could result in an adjust-
ment to the June 30, 1994 financial statements. In either case, if such differ-
ences were taken into account, the amount of Adjusted Stockholders' Equity
would be different, resulting in either a change in the number of shares of
Class B Common Stock which would be received by Citadel or in the amount of the
Adjustment Payment to Citadel. However, holders of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock will not be able to cause an adjustment to such number of
shares or to the amount of the Adjustment Payment.
The amount of the Bank's net loss for the six months ended June 30, 1994, and
the amount of its stockholders' equity at such date will not be determined un-
til immediately prior to the Closing. Thus, purchasers of Class A Common Stock
and Class C Common Stock will not have the benefit of such information at the
time they execute Investors' Purchase Agreements. This raises the possibility
that determinations of accounting issues made by the management and the current
Board of Directors of the Bank may be adverse to the interests of purchasers of
Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock. In order to limit the potential
for such adverse determination and to provide greater certainty with respect to
the determination of the Bank's stockholders' equity at June 30, 1994, the Bank
and Citadel have agreed on the accounting treatment of certain items, including
the manner in which the level of GVAs to be established as of June 30, 1994,
will be taken into account in determining stockholders' equity (see "Restruc-
turing and Recapitalization--Recapitalization-- Closing Adjustments"), the man-
ner in which certain expenses associated with the Restructuring and Recapitali-
zation will be reflected in the second quarter results and on the accounting
treatment to be accorded to certain other items relating to the ongoing opera-
tions and financial condition of the Bank for purposes of reflecting such items
in the June 30, 1994 financial statements. However, neither purchasers of Class
A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock nor, with the exception of Messrs.
Greenwood, Goldsmith and Perry, persons who will become directors of the Bank
upon the Closing will be involved as directors in such determinations, even
though their resolution will directly affect the Bank's financial statements at
and for the six months ended June 30, 1994, and thus indirectly affect the num-
ber of shares of Class B Common Stock to be received by Citadel and the ulti-
mate percentage interest of the holders of Class A Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock in the Bank. Notwithstanding the arrangements described above and
to be reached and management's desire to present fairly the financial condition
of the Bank, resolution of these issues will not be made at arms
23
<PAGE>
length and may be viewed to have been made by persons who have a conflict of
interest or an interest in the transactions described in this Offering Circu-
lar which differs from the interests of purchasers of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock.
Liquidity of Investment
The Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby is being reg-
istered under the rules and regulations of the OTS. However, the shares of
Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock will be subject to resale re-
strictions. Each of the purchasers of the Class A Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock offered hereby will be required to execute and deliver to the
Bank the Investors' Purchase Agreement that will effectively limit the pur-
chasers' rights to resell the shares. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sales"
below.
In addition, there currently exists no trading market for the shares of Class
A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby, and the Bank does not
currently contemplate applying for inclusion of the Class A Common Stock or
Class C Common Stock on the NASDAQ or for listing of such Common Stock on any
securities exchange. Only a very limited market (if any) is likely to develop
in the future.
Certain Tax Considerations
As a result of distributing the Office Buildings, the D&O Litigation (as de-
fined below) and a cash payment (if any) equal to the Adjustment Payment, Fi-
delity may recognize income from recapture of excess tax bad debt reserves.
Moreover, Fidelity will undergo an ownership change under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), as a result of the Re-
capitalization. As a consequence, if Fidelity incurs a net operating loss in
taxable year 1994 or has a net unrealized built-in loss at the time of the Re-
capitalization and such losses are attributable to the pre-ownership change
period, the use of such losses to offset post-ownership change taxable income
will be subject to a limitation imposed by Section 382 of the Code. See "Cer-
tain Federal Income Tax Considerations."
Regulatory Limitations on Ownership; Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions
Federal law and regulations prohibit a person or company from acquiring con-
trol of a savings association, such as the Bank, without, in most cases, prior
written approval of the OTS. Control is conclusively presumed if, among other
things, a person or a company acquires more than 25% of any class of voting
stock of such savings association. Control is rebuttably presumed if a person
or a company acquires more than 10% of any class of voting stock of a savings
association or more than 25% of a class of non-voting stock and is subject to
any of eight "control factors." The regulations provide a procedure for rebut-
tal of such control presumption. Violations of the federal change of control
regulations can result in severe sanctions, including, among other things,
civil money penalties. Prospective purchasers are urged to consult legal coun-
sel experienced in savings institution matters if, as a result of this offer-
ing, in combination with other transactions, they will, either alone or with
others with whom they are, or may be deemed to be, acting in concert (as that
term is defined in the applicable regulations), acquire more than 10% of all
outstanding shares of any class of the Bank's Common Stock or obtain the abil-
ity to control in any manner the election of a majority of the Bank's direc-
tors or otherwise to direct the management or policies of the Bank. In addi-
tion, any person who acquires voting securities of the Bank having a value of
$15 million or more, or constituting 15% or more of the outstanding voting se-
curities of the Bank, whichever is less, may, subject to certain exceptions
available for purchasers with an investment intent, be required to observe the
notification and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Anti-
trust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, before acquiring such voting secu-
rities. Prospective purchasers should consult legal counsel if, upon the con-
summation of this offering, they would own, either alone or with others with
whom they are, or may be deemed to be, acting in concert (as that term is de-
fined in the applicable law and regulations), 10% or more of the shares or $15
million or more in value of voting securities of the Bank. Bank holding compa-
nies and savings and loan holding companies are generally prohibited from ac-
quiring, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of any class of voting securi-
ties of the Bank, or from otherwise acquiring control of the Bank, without the
prior approval of the OTS and, for bank holding companies, the FRB. Prospec-
tive purchasers that are bank holding companies or savings and loan holding
companies (or affiliates thereof) are urged to consult legal counsel experi-
enced in depository institution holding company matters prior to acquiring
shares of the Bank's Common Stock.
24
<PAGE>
The Bank will not be required to issue shares of Class A Common Stock or Class
C Common Stock to any purchaser if the Bank determines that the purchaser is
required to obtain prior clearance or approval from any state or federal bank
regulatory authority to own or control such shares unless, prior to the Clos-
ing, evidence of such clearance or approval has been provided to the Bank. Such
determination will be made by the Bank as soon as practicable. If the Bank
elects not to issue shares in such case, such shares will become available to
satisfy subscriptions, and the purchase price for such shares will be refunded
promptly without interest or deduction.
Certain provisions of the Amended Charter and Bylaws of the Bank as well as
certain federal regulations may be considered to have an anti-takeover effect.
These provisions include: (i) regulatory limitations on share accumulations as
described above; (ii) additional authorized Common Stock and Preferred Stock
which can be issued without additional stockholder action; (iii) the restric-
tions on transfers of the Common Stock; (iv) the classified Board of Directors
of the Bank; and (v) the bad debt recapture rules that would be applicable if
the Bank were to cease to meet certain definitions and other tests under the
Code. See "Business - Taxation." See also "Management."
The precise impact of an acquisition of the Bank by an individual or institu-
tion desirous of terminating the Bank's status as a thrift for tax purposes is
impossible to determine at this time and would depend on an analysis of, among
other things, the size of the Bank's bad debt reserve at the time of such ac-
quisition, the choice of method used in recapturing the Bank's bad debt reserve
and the characteristics of the Bank's write-off experience and existing loan
portfolio at such time.
Shares Eligible for Future Sale
The shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby may
not be transferred for a period of 30 days following the consummation of this
offering and, following such 30 day period, the shares of Class A and Class C
Common Stock may be transferred only in blocks of 100,000 shares or more until
the Form 10-K Filing Date. After the Form 10-K Filing Date, all contractual
minimum block size transfer restrictions will be eliminated. See "Shares Eligi-
ble for Future Sale; Transfer Restrictions."
All of the shares of Class B Common Stock will be eligible for sale without
registration, subject to certain limits on the number of shares sold, and will
also be eligible for sale without such limits if a registration on Form OC re-
lating to such shares is filed and becomes effective. The holders of Class B
Common Stock will be granted certain demand registration rights with respect to
such shares which may be exercised on or after January 1, 1995, provided that
no registration statement filed by the Bank pursuant to any such demand may be-
come effective prior to the Form 10-K Filing Date. In addition, holders of
Class B Common Stock will have certain other rights regarding sales of shares
of Class B Common Stock. See "Description of Capital Stock."
No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales, or the
availability of shares of capital stock for future sale, will have on the mar-
ket price of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock pre-
vailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of stock, or the per-
ception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market prices
for such shares. See "Description of Capital Stock" and "Shares Eligible for
Future Sale; Transfer Restrictions."
USE OF PROCEEDS
The net proceeds from the sale of the minimum number of shares of Class A Com-
mon Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby are expected to be approxi-
mately $104.8 million ($110.1 million if the Bank accepts subscriptions for the
Additional Shares) after estimated Placement Agency Fee and other offering ex-
penses. In addition, pursuant to a financial advisory engagement letter dated
October 29, 1993, among Citadel, the Bank and J.P. Morgan, J.P. Morgan is also
entitled to an additional 1% of the gross proceeds from this offering ("Success
Fee"), subject to certain offsets. Fidelity intends to use all of the net pro-
ceeds from the sale of the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock of-
fered hereby, together with the proceeds from the Bulk Sales, to repay (i) out-
standing commercial paper of the Bank ($254 million outstanding as of March 31,
1994); (ii) $60 million principal amount of Subordinated Notes plus accrued and
unpaid interest plus the Recapitalization Fee; and (iii) a portion of the
Bank's outstanding FHLB Advances. Any remaining net proceeds will be used for
general corporate purposes.
25
<PAGE>
RESTRUCTURING AND RECAPITALIZATION
BACKGROUND OF THE TRANSACTION
Recent Losses and Asset Quality Problems
During each of 1993, 1992 and 1991, the Southern California economy and real
estate markets showed significant declines, adversely affecting the Bank's per-
formance and loan and real estate portfolios. During the first quarter of 1994,
the Bank's performance continued to be adversely affected by increased foreclo-
sure activities of the Bank reflecting the continued weakness of the Southern
California economy and a depressed real estate market. The Bank reported net
losses of $65.9 million and net income of $0.3 million and $8.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively, and reported net
losses of $14.2 million for the first quarter of 1994.
The Bank had NPAs totaling $236 million, $234 million and $125 million, respec-
tively, at December 31, 1993, 1992, and 1991, respectively, and $266 million at
the end of the first quarter of 1994. NPAs include non-accruing loans, ISF and
REO, but do not include TDRs, unless the TDRs would otherwise fall into
nonaccruing loans or ISF. Classified assets increased from $228.4 million at
December 31, 1991, to $353.7 million at December 31, 1992 to $372.5 million at
December 31, 1993, and were at $390.5 million at March 31, 1994. Classified as-
sets include NPAs and other assets that the Bank has designated as substandard,
doubtful or loss. TDRs declined by $58.6 million in 1993 to $28.7 million as of
December 31, 1993 compared to $87.3 million at December 31, 1992, and $6.9 mil-
lion at December 31, 1991, while TDRs totaled $33.8 million at March 31, 1994.
REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Under the PCA, a thrift is deemed "adequately capitalized" if its core capital
to adjusted total assets and its core capital to risk-weighted assets ratios
are each at least 4% (3% if the institution has received the highest examina-
tion rating) and its total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio is at least
8%. To qualify for "well capitalized" status, the required capital ratios are
5%, 6% and 10%, respectively, provided the institution is not subject to any
order or directive from the OTS to meet a specific capital level.
Fidelity's capital position has deteriorated significantly in recent periods.
As of March 31, 1994, Fidelity's tangible, core and risk-based capital ratios
were 4.00%, 4.04% and 9.10%, respectively, down from 4.12%, 4.16% and 9.34% at
December 31, 1993, and 4.27%, 4.35% and 9.76% at December 31, 1992. Although
Fidelity's capital levels at March 31, 1994, exceeded all currently applicable
minimum capital requirements and the Bank was deemed "adequately capitalized"
under the PCA as of such date, such levels included the effect of $28.0 million
of capital contributions from Citadel during 1993 and the sale of $155.3 mil-
lion in performing loans in a bulk sale transaction during the first quarter of
1994. Citadel, with only $0.9 million in liquid assets at March 31, 1994, and
ongoing expenses in connection with the Restructuring described below, is not
in a position to make further capital contributions to the Bank, nor does Cita-
del have ready access to additional funds under current circumstances. Absent
the consummation of the Restructuring and Recapitalization, at June 30, 1994,
Fidelity's ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets is expected to be be-
low 4% and, as a result, Fidelity would be classified as "undercapitalized" un-
der the PCA. As such, Fidelity would be subject to significant additional regu-
latory restrictions and requirements. Accordingly, management of the Bank has
proposed the Restructuring and Recapitalization, which is designed to dispose
of substantially all of the Bank's NPAs as of March 31, 1994, and to improve
the capital of the Bank.
RESTRUCTURING
Bulk Sales
Prior to the Closing or with respect to the REMIC Transaction thereafter, Fi-
delity will enter into two or more Bulk Sale Agreements pursuant to which Fi-
delity will sell to third parties (or, in the case of certain assets, to Cita-
del) in two or more Bulk Sales certain problem and other assets of the Bank.
The Bulk Sale Assets have an aggregate net book value as of March 31, 1994, of
approximately $490 million, including substantially all of the Bank's NPAs at
March 31, 1994.
26
<PAGE>
The Primary Bulk Sale is designed to dispose of assets with a net book value of
approximately $396 million at March 31, 1994, comprised of $170 million of NPAs
(including REO), $157 million of other criticized assets and $69 million of
"pass" assets. As part of the Primary Bulk Sale, the REMIC Assets may be sold
to a REMIC in connection with the REMIC Transaction. The entire interest in the
REMIC would be sold in a private placement and, accordingly, the Bank would not
retain any residual interest in the REMIC. At the time of the Closing, the Bank
will not have entered into a definitive agreement with respect to the sale of
assets to the REMIC nor is it expected that the REMIC will have entered into a
definitive agreement with respect to the sales of securities to be issued by it
in the private placement.
Also, as part of the Primary Bulk Sale, the Bank expects to sell to Citadel
(the "Citadel Bulk Sale") four properties having an aggregate net book value at
March 31, 1994, of approximately $24.5 million. It is anticipated that the Cit-
adel Assets will be sold to Citadel for an aggregate price of approximately
$20.3 million. This sales price is based upon the "derived investment value"
for each property, which is approximately the price at which Fidelity would ex-
pect to sell the Citadel Assets if they were included in the Primary Bulk Sale.
The "derived investment value" is based on a discounted cash flow analysis that
estimates the amount of cash to be collected for each asset, either through
collection of principal and interest on the performing loan or through collec-
tion of net rental receipts and eventual sale of the asset. The derived invest-
ment value of each Citadel Asset may not be equal to the fair market value of
such asset if such asset were to be sold separately. Fidelity intends to fi-
nance approximately 75% of the purchase price of three of the four Citadel As-
sets by making three separate loans to Citadel at Fidelity's standard market
rates secured by the respective properties. With respect to each of the two
Citadel Assets consisting of multifamily properties, Fidelity will make a ten-
year loan, amortized over 30 years, at an adjustable rate of interest tied to
the one-year treasury rate plus 3.75%, with an initial interest rate of 7.25%.
The loan secured by the third Citadel Asset, which is a commercial office
building, will have a seven-year term, amortizing over 25 years, with an ad-
justable rate of interest tied to the six-month LIBOR rate plus 4.75%, with an
initial interest rate of 9.25%. The loans will have other standard features
commensurate with the respective properties and loan program types, including
loan fees paid to Fidelity.
The Secondary Bulk Sale is designed to dispose of assets with a net book value
of approximately $94 million at March 31, 1994, comprised of $87 million of
NPAs (including REO), $6 million of other criticized assets and $1 million of
"pass" assets.
Each of the Bulk Sales is expected to be completed shortly after the Closing.
However, no assurance can be given that the Bulk Sales, individually or in the
aggregate, will be consummated or, if consummated, at what price. See "Risk
Factors -Certain Considerations Regarding the Restructuring and
Recapitalization - Consummation of the Bulk Sales."
The Bulk Sale Agreements and the REMIC Agreements are expected to include cer-
tain representations and warranties relating to the assets transferred. For a
period of time ranging from 60 to 180 days after the related closings, the pur-
chasers of the assets under the Bulk Sale Agreements will have the right to re-
quire Fidelity, at Fidelity's option, either to repurchase Bulk Sale Assets as
to which representations and warranties are discovered to be untrue or to cure
such breach. The repurchase price for each Bulk Sale Asset repurchased is equal
to the allocated purchase price paid plus amounts expended by the purchaser
post-closing, minus amounts received by the purchasers post-closing with re-
spect to such asset. The REMIC Agreements are expected to include similar pro-
visions. This repurchase obligation will not apply to the Citadel Bulk Sale.
Certain of the representations and warranties in the Bulk Sales Agreements (but
not the REMIC Agreements) concerning the environmental and structural condition
of the REO or the properties underlying mortgage loans which are Bulk Sales As-
sets may require treatment as recourse arrangements for purposes of determining
risk-based capital requirements for the Bank (the "Recourse Representations").
OTS capital requirements generally will require such recourse treatment where
"nonstandard" representations and warranties are given, including representa-
tions as to facts which not been verified by reasonable due diligence. The Re-
course Representations are being made with respect to Bulk Sale Assets for
which no related third-party structural and/or environmental inspection or as-
sessment reports have been obtained by the Bank, and thus may be considered un-
der OTS regulations to be recourse arrangements. The Recourse Representations
will be made
27
<PAGE>
only with respect to Bulk Sale Assets constituting approximately $29 million
and $40 million, respectively, of the estimated purchase price of the Bulk Sale
Assets in the Primary Bulk Sale and Secondary Bulk Sale. The obligations of the
Bank under the Bulk Sale Agreements with respect to the Recourse Representa-
tions will terminate on the sixtieth day after the closing date if a notice of
breach has not been received. Upon the expiration of such sixty-day period, the
Bank will no longer be obligated to include any portion of the Bulk Sale Assets
in the risk-based assets category for purposes of risk-based capital calcula-
tions. The representations and warranties to be made with respect to the REMIC
Assets are not expected to constitute Recourse Representations.
The Bank will enter into an agreement with Citadel which will provide that Cit-
adel will indemnify the Bank up to $4 million for certain losses incurred by
the Bank in either repurchasing Bulk Sale Assets if the breached representation
is a Recourse Representation or curing such breach.
Giving pro forma effect to the sale of all of the Bulk Sale Assets as of March
31, 1994, the Bank's NPAs would decrease from 6.5% of total assets of the Bank
to 0.5%. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information."
Redemption of Subordinated Debt
The Bank entered into the Subordinated Loan Agreement pursuant to which $60
million in Subordinated Notes are currently outstanding. The Subordinated Notes
are guaranteed by Citadel and qualify as Tier 2 capital of the Bank. On March
4, 1994, Chase, one lender under the Subordinated Loan Agreement, filed the
Chase Lawsuit alleging, among other things, that the transfer of assets pursu-
ant the Bank's earlier planned restructuring would constitute a breach of the
Subordinated Loan Agreement, including the tangible net worth and various other
financial tests contained therein, and seeking to enjoin such restructuring and
to recover damages in unspecified amounts. In addition, the Chase Lawsuit al-
leged that past responses of Citadel and Fidelity to requests by Chase for in-
formation regarding the restructuring violated certain provisions of the Subor-
dinated Loan Agreement and that such alleged violations, with the passage of
time, have become current defaults under the Subordinated Loan Agreement. While
the other three lenders under the Subordinated Loan Agreement hold $25 million
of the Subordinated Notes, none of them joined Chase in the Chase Lawsuit.
Citadel and the Bank have entered into the Settlement Agreement with the four
lenders pursuant to which, among other things, (i) the Chase Lawsuit has been
dismissed with prejudice, and (ii) simultaneously with the Closing, the Bank
will redeem the $60 million of Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal
to the unpaid principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest (esti-
mated to be approximately $1.2 million assuming that the Closing occurs on July
15, 1994), plus the Recapitalization Fee.
The amount of the Recapitalization Fee ranges from $1 million to $4.95 million,
depending upon the amount of the cash and non-cash consideration to be received
or retained by Citadel as part of the Restructuring and Recapitalization. The
redemption of the Subordinated Notes will result in a write-off of $1.51 mil-
lion of unamortized issuance cost.
The redemption of the Subordinated Notes will result in the Bank's risk-based
capital ratio, giving effect to the Restructuring and Recapitalization as of
March 31, 1994, remaining below the 10% level specified for a "well capital-
ized" institution under the PCA. On the other hand, the redemption of the Sub-
ordinated Notes will result in savings in annual interest expense of approxi-
mately $7 million.
Certain Affiliate Transfers
In addition to the Citadel Bulk Sale described under "Bulk Sales," at or prior
to the Closing, Citadel and the Bank will consummate the following transac-
tions:
Sale of Gateway Capital Stock. Prior to the Closing, Citadel will sell to Fi-
delity all the outstanding capital stock of Gateway for a purchase price of
$1.0 million, payable in cash, which is expected to approximate the book value
of such capital stock as of June 30, 1994. As a result, Gateway will become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Fidelity.
28
<PAGE>
Transfer/Leaseback of Buildings. Fidelity will transfer to Citadel by way of a
dividend two Office Buildings in California located at 600 North Brand Boule-
vard in Glendale (the "Glendale Building") and 14455 Ventura Boulevard in Sher-
man Oaks (the "Sherman Oaks Building"), respectively, with an aggregate net
book value of approximately $9.3 million as of March 31, 1994. The Glendale
Building currently contains Fidelity's main branch office and its executive of-
fices and the Sherman Oaks Building contains another Fidelity branch office. At
the Closing, it is expected that Citadel and Fidelity will enter into a 10-
year, full service gross lease for the Glendale Building. The rental rate for
the first five years of the lease term will be approximately $26,600 per month
including parking for the ground floor and approximately $75,000 per month in-
cluding parking for the fourth, fifth and sixth floors. This lease would pro-
vide for annual rental increases at the lower of the increase in the Consumer
Price Index ("CPI") or 3%. After the first five years of the lease term, the
rental rate for the ground floor would be adjusted to the higher of the then
current market rate or the prevailing rental rate in the fifth year of the
lease and the rental rate for the upper floors would be adjusted to the higher
of the then current market rate or $1.50 per square foot increased by the an-
nual rental rate increase applied during the first five years of the lease as
described in the preceeding sentence. Fidelity will have the option to extend
the lease of the ground floor for two consecutive five year terms at a market
rental rate and will have the option to purchase the Glendale Building at a
market rate at the expiration of the lease term, provided that Citadel then
owns the building.
It is also expected that Citadel and Fidelity will enter into a seven-year,
triple net, master lease pursuant to which Fidelity will lease from Citadel the
Sherman Oaks Building. Fidelity will pay approximately $29,950 per month in
rent, including parking. The rental will increase each year at the lower of the
increase in the CPI or 3%. At the expiration of the master lease term, Fidelity
will have the option to enter into a lease of the ground floor for two consecu-
tive five year terms at a market rental rate.
Transfer of D&O Litigation. Immediately prior to the Closing, Fidelity will
transfer to Citadel its interest in an existing lawsuit filed against the car-
rier of its directors' and officers' insurance policies, involving certain cov-
erage and indemnity issues ("D&O Litigation"). Fidelity had obtained a substan-
tial monetary judgment against its carrier which was reversed and remanded by
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in December, 1993. On remand, the trial
court rendered a subsequent judgment in favor of Fidelity of approximately $2.9
million. This judgment has again been appealed to the Ninth Circuit by its car-
rier; the carrier contends that the correct amount should be between $289,000
and zero. The D&O Litigation is not reflected as an asset on Fidelity's books.
The REMIC Transaction, the other Bulk Sales (at the prices set forth in the
Bulk Sale Agreements), the redemption of the Subordinated Notes and the Affili-
ate Transfers described above are collectively referred to as the "Restructur-
ing."
RECAPITALIZATION
The Bank plans to recapitalize the Bank through the sale of the 20,952,381
shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby and the
reclassification of the currently outstanding share of Existing Common Stock
into 6,595,624 shares of Class B Common Stock, which number of shares may be
reduced as described below under "Closing Adjustments."
The one outstanding share of Existing Common Stock currently is owned of record
by Citadel. Immediately prior to the completion of this offering, Fidelity will
amend its charter to provide for the Class A, Class B and Class C Common Stock.
Upon the completion of this offering, the purchasers of the shares of Class A
Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby will own all of the out-
standing shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock, which will
represent approximately 76.1% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Bank, and
Citadel will own all of the outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock, which
will represent approximately 23.9% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Bank,
assuming the 20,952,381 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock
offered hereby are purchased and no closing adjustments are made. The offering
of the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock is contingent
upon, among other things, the sale of the 20,952,381 shares of Class A Common
Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby.
29
<PAGE>
Closing Adjustments
The relative percentage interests referred to above of Citadel and the purchas-
ers of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock are based upon an Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity of the Bank as of June 30, 1994, of $86 million. If the
Adjusted Stockholders' Equity of the Bank as of June 30, 1994 varies from $86
million, certain adjustments will be made to the terms of the Recapitalization
as they apply to Citadel. If the Adjusted Stockholders' Equity of the Bank is
less than $86 million, the number of shares of Class B Common Stock to be is-
sued to Citadel will be reduced so that the Bank's stockholders' equity per
share of Common Stock upon the consummation of this offering equals the same
amount it would have been if Adjusted Stockholders' Equity had equaled $86 mil-
lion. Conversely, if the Adjusted Stockholders' Equity of the Bank exceeds $86
million, the Bank will be obligated to pay to Citadel in cash the Adjustment
Payment.
For example, if the Adjusted Stockholders' Equity were $80 million as of June
30, 1994, Citadel's one share of currently outstanding stock would be reclassi-
fied into 5,729,561 shares of Class B Common Stock, representing a 21.5% inter-
est in the Bank. If the Adjusted Shareholders' Equity were $92 million, a cash
dividend of $6 million would be payable to Citadel.
"Adjusted Stockholders' Equity" of the Bank will be equal to the following:
(i) the unaudited stockholders' equity of the Bank as of June 30, 1994,
without giving effect to this offering, but giving effect to the Restruc-
turing Adjustment;
(ii) minus (plus) the amount by which the Bank's GVA as of June 30, 1994,
giving effect to the Restructuring Adjustment, is less than (or exceeds)
the Target GVA;
(iii) plus specific reserves established after the January 1994 Northridge
earthquake with respect to Earthquake Accommodation Loans;
(iv) plus (minus) certain other adjustments set forth in the Investors'
Purchase Agreements;
(v) plus so much of the Branch Profit on the sale of the Specified Branches
as will not cause Adjusted Stockholders' Equity to exceed $86 million, pro-
vided that Branch Purchase Agreements are entered into no later than August
15, 1994.
"Target GVA" means $58 million plus 20% of the amount, if any, by which the
Bank's "Adjusted NPAs" exceed $41 million. "Adjusted NPAs" means the sum of the
Bank's NPAs at June 30, 1994 (giving effect to the Restructuring Adjustment),
plus the outstanding amount of any Earthquake Accommodation Loans that are 30
days or more delinquent as of August 1, 1994 (pursuant to the related accommo-
dation agreements) and that are not already included in NPAs as of June 30,
1994 and not included in the Bulk Sale Assets, provided that, for purposes of
this calculation, NPAs and Adjusted NPAs will not include any loans in the
Earthquake TDR Pool.
The determinations of the amount of proceeds to the Bank from the REMIC Trans-
action, the status of Earthquake Accommodation Loans at August 1, 1994 and the
Branch Profit will only be made after the Closing, and thus the final adjust-
ments to Adjusted Stockholders' Equity resulting from such determinations can-
not be made at the Closing. At the Closing, those factors will be estimated for
purposes of estimating Adjusted Stockholders' Equity and determining the appro-
priate number of shares of Class B Common Stock Citadel is to hold at the Clos-
ing. When the post-Closing determinations are made and Adjusted Stockholders'
Equity is calculated, an automatic post-Closing adjustment to the number of
outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock will be made pursuant to the Amended
Charter.
Adjusted Stockholders' Equity is based on the Bank's consolidated financial
statements at and for the six months ended June 30, 1994. Such financial state-
ments and the adjustments thereto will not be audited. Adjusted Stockholders'
Equity will not equal the Company's actual stockholders' equity as of June 30,
1994. Such information will be used solely for the purpose of determining the
relative percentage interests of Citadel and the purchasers of Class A Common
Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby following the Closing or the
amount of the Adjustment Payment, as applicable. See "Risk Factors - Certain
Considerations Regarding the Restructuring and Recapitalization - Risks Relat-
ing to Determination of Adjusted Stockholders' Equity; Conflicts of Interest."
30
<PAGE>
Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock
See "Description of Capital Stock" for a description of the Class A Common
Stock, the Class B Common Stock and the Class C Common Stock.
CLOSING CONDITIONS
The Closing is contingent upon the satisfaction of various conditions, includ-
ing, without limitation, the following: (i) the existence of binding Bulk Sale
Agreements for the sale by Fidelity of the Bulk Sale Assets that will not be
sold in the REMIC Transaction, which sales are expected to occur shortly after
the Closing; (ii) the redemption of the Subordinated Notes and the dismissal of
the Chase Lawsuit; (iii) the consummation of each of the Affiliate Transfers;
(iv) the reclassification of the Existing Common Stock into shares of Class B
Common Stock and the amendment of the Existing Charter of the Bank to provide
for the Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock; and (v) the approval of
the foregoing transactions by the OTS.
31
<PAGE>
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Bank at March 31,
1994, (i) on an historical basis, (ii) as adjusted to give effect to the Recap-
italization and Restructuring other than the Secondary Bulk Sale, and (iii) as
adjusted to give effect to the Recapitalization and Restructuring including the
Secondary Bulk Sale, assuming 20,952,381 shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock are sold and no reduction in the shares of Class B Common
Stock and no Adjustment Payment are made.
For a description of the assumptions utilized in deriving the pro forma effect
on the Bank of the Restructuring and Recapitalization, see "Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Information." There can be no assurances that the Bulk
Sales will be consummated or, if consummated, at what price. See "Risk Fac-
tors - Certain Considerations Regarding the Offering - Consummation of the Bulk
Sales."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1994
AS ADJUSTED FOR AS ADJUSTED FOR
RECAPITALIZATION RECAPITALIZATION
AND AND
RESTRUCTURING RESTRUCTURING
OTHER THAN INCLUDING
SECONDARY BULK SECONDARY BULK
HISTORICAL SALE SALE
---------- ---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Deposits $3,171,306 $3,171,205 $3,171,205
FHLB Advances 342,700 322,700 322,700
Commercial paper 254,000 - -
Mortgage-backed notes 100,000 100,000 100,000
Other liabilities 19,575 12,439 11,219
Subordinated notes 60,000 - -
---------- ---------------- ----------------
Total liabilities 3,947,581 3,606,344 3,605,124
---------- ---------------- ----------------
Stockholders' Equity:
Serial Preferred Stock, par
value $.01 per share;
authorized 10,000,000 shares;
no shares outstanding - - -
Common stock:
Common stock, par value of
$.01 per share; authorized,
20,000,000 shares; 1 share
issued and outstanding; no
shares outstanding as
adjusted for this offering - - -
Class A and Class C, par
value $.01 per share; no
shares outstanding as of
March 31, 1994 and
20,952,381 shares
outstanding as adjusted for
this offering - 210 210
Class B, par value $.01 per
share; no shares
outstanding as of
March 31, 1994 and
6,595,624 shares
outstanding as adjusted for
this offering - 66 66
Paid-in capital 70,689 175,263 175,263
Unrealized loss on securities
available for sale (1,206) (1,206) (1,206)
Retained earnings 97,444 34,355 21,152
---------- ---------------- ----------------
Total stockholders' equity 166,927 208,688 195,485
---------- ---------------- ----------------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $4,114,508 $3,815,032 $3,800,609
========== ================ ================
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents certain Selected Historical Consolidated Financial
Data derived from the audited and unaudited historical consolidated financial
statements of Fidelity and its subsidiaries, and should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing else-
where in this Offering Circular. In the opinion of management, such unaudited
historical consolidated financial statements elsewhere herein reflect all mate-
rial adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary
for a fair presentation.
The consummation of the Restructuring and the Recapitalization described herein
is expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated operations of the
Company following the Closing. Accordingly, the financial results of the Com-
pany following the Closing are expected to differ significantly from those of
the Bank and its subsidiaries prior to the Closing, and the financial results
of the Bank and its subsidiaries for periods prior to the Closing are not nec-
essarily indicative of the results of operations or financial condition for fu-
ture periods. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31,
1994 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations of Fidelity
and its subsidiaries for the full year.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT OR FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) 1994 1993 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INCOME STATEMENT
SUMMARY:
Interest income $ 64,074 $78,187 $ 289,331 $370,715 $520,052 $526,934 $471,469
Interest expense 38,668 49,407 188,494 240,124 378,514 412,012 395,498
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net Interest Income 25,406 28,780 100,837 130,591 141,538 114,922 75,971
Provision for estimated
loan losses 15,600 7,500 65,100 51,180 49,843 11,039 8,359
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net interest income
after provision for
estimated loan losses 9,806 21,280 35,737 79,411 91,695 103,883 67,612
Noninterest income
(expense):
Loan and other fee
income 1,198 2,018 5,389 7,885 5,869 3,368 3,053
Gains (losses) on sales
of loans, net (2,804) 395 194 1,117 2,118 (1,408) (1)
Fee income from
investment products 591 -- -- 2,606 2,487 848 --
Fee income on deposits
and other income
(expense) 907 789 3,271 4,406 (3,351) 3,641 7,057
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(108) 3,202 8,854 16,014 7,123 6,449 10,109
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Provision for estimated
real estate losses (4,300) (1,000) (30,200) (17,820) (7,537) (1,576) (837)
Direct costs of real
estate operations, net (2,057) (3,318) (18,643) (4,441) (2,060) (772) 575
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(6,357) (4,318) (48,843) (22,261) (9,597) (2,348) (262)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Gains (losses) on sales
of mortgage-backed
securities, net (621) -- 1,342 -- 8,993 (165) --
Gains (losses) on sales
of investment
securities, net 329 -- (38) -- 1 32 (234)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(292) -- 1,304 -- 8,994 (133) (234)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total noninterest income
(expense) (6,757) (1,116) (38,685) (6,247) 6,520 3,968 9,613
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating expense 24,825 19,687 98,732 75,044 75,815 63,614 60,507
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Earnings (loss) before
income taxes (21,776) 477 (101,680) (1,880) 22,400 44,237 16,718
Income tax expense
(benefit) (7,625) 271 (35,793) (2,167) 14,296 18,980 6,357
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net earnings (loss) $(14,151) $ 206 $ (65,887) $ 287 $ 8,104 $ 25,257 $ 10,361
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT OR FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets $4,114,508 $4,743,439 $4,383,979 $4,695,518 $5,123,835 $5,695,797 $4,980,462
Total loans, net 3,549,591 3,938,914 3,712,051 3,990,449 4,548,457 5,092,269 4,437,199
Deposits 3,171,306 3,292,936 3,368,664 3,459,648 3,885,861 3,970,575 3,324,160
FHLB Advances 342,700 471,400 326,400 581,400 325,000 755,000 725,000
Other borrowings 354,000 634,117 407,830 327,000 531,150 579,166 607,219
Subordinated notes 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 75,000 75,000 -
Stockholders' equity 166,927 238,377 182,284 220,171 221,959 223,855 213,598
SELECTED OPERATING
RATIOS:
Return on average
assets (1.33)% 0.02% (1.44)% 0.01% 0.15% 0.48% 0.21%
Return on average
equity (32.42)% 0.36% (32.74)% 0.13% 3.64% 11.55% 5.16%
Average equity divided
by average assets 4.09% 4.95% 4.40% 4.57% 4.03% 4.15% 4.17%
Ending equity divided
by ending assets 4.06% 5.03% 4.16% 4.69% 4.33% 3.93% 4.29%
Operating expenses to
average assets 1.85% 1.70% 2.16% 1.52% 1.37% 1.21% 1.25%
Efficiency ratio(1) 86.41% 61.56% 75.12% 45.38% 49.02% 51.74% 70.29%
ASSET QUALITY DATA:
NPAs(2) $ 265,963 $ 271,698 $ 235,621 $ 234,405 $ 124,725 $ 48,468 $ 20,712
NPAs to total assets 6.46% 5.72% 5.37% 4.99% 2.43% 0.85% 0.42%
Nonaccruing loans $ 139,376 $ 126,349 $ 93,475 $ 112,041 $ 68,982 $ 30,161 $ 12,087
Nonaccruing loans to
total loans 3.93% 3.23% 2.52% 2.83% 1.53% 0.61% 0.27%
GVA $ 85,073 $ 74,977 $ 80,020 $ 75,621 $ 52,374 $ 16,552 $ 7,336
GVA to NPAs(3) 30.99% 26.56% 32.79% 30.49% 41.99% 34.14% 38.38%
GVA to loans and REO
(including ISF)(4) 2.26% 1.81% 2.03% 1.82% 1.13% 0.32% 0.18%
Loan GVA to nonaccruing
loans and ISF 54.92% 40.47% 58.75% 38.15% 55.44% 56.67% 66.67%
OTHER DATA:
Cash dividends $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ 15,000 $ -
Sales of investment
products(5) $ 24,713 $ 36,487 $ 96,253 $ 77,078 $ 57,857 $ 38,584 $ 40,794
Number of:
Real estate loan
accounts (in
thousands) 15 18 16 18 21 28 27
Deposit accounts (in
thousands) 241 233 241 233 238 234 203
Retail branch
offices(6) 42 43 42 43 43 44 34
</TABLE>
(1) The efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense by net
interest income and noninterest income, excluding nonrecurring items, pro-
visions for estimated loan and real estate losses, direct costs of real es-
tate operations and gains/losses on the sale of securities.
(2) NPAs include nonaccruing loans, REO and ISF (net of REO GVA), but do not
include TDRs, unless they fall into one of the foregoing categories.
(3) NPAs in this ratio are calculated prior to the reduction for REO GVA.
(4) Loans and REO in the ratio are calculated prior to the reduction for loan
and REO GVA, but are net of specific reserves.
(5) Investment products are provided to customers of the Bank through Gateway.
Gateway was a subsidiary of the Bank until the fourth quarter of 1992 when
it became a subsidiary of Citadel.
(6) All retail branch offices are located in Southern California.
34
<PAGE>
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Set forth on pages 35-42 are the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
financial condition and certain other pro forma data of the Bank as of March
31, 1994. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of financial condition
and such other data has been prepared as if the Restructuring and Recapitaliza-
tion had occurred on March 31, 1994. SUCH UNAUDITED PRO FORMA INFORMATION DOES
NOT PURPORT TO REPRESENT WHAT FIDELITY'S FINANCIAL CONDITION ACTUALLY WOULD
HAVE BEEN HAD THE RESTRUCTURING AND RECAPITALIZATION OCCURRED ON MARCH 31,
1994, OR TO PROJECT THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL CONDITION AT ANY FUTURE DATE. The
pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assump-
tions that the Bank believes are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma informa-
tion presented on such pages should be read in conjunction with the historical
financial statements of the Bank included elsewhere in this Offering Circular.
The pro forma information does not reflect the results of operations of the
Company since March 31, 1994, or changes in the amount or composition of the
Bank's assets since March 31, 1994, or any other changes since March 31, 1994,
that would require additional regulatory capital. Accordingly, the pro forma
adjustments and ratios shown on the following pages should not be construed as
actual or projected as of any specific date. No assurance can be given that
there have not been any changes since March 31, 1994, that would require addi-
tional regulatory capital. In addition, the pro forma information assumes
20,952,381 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock are sold and
no reduction in the shares of Class B Common Stock and no Adjustment Payment
are made.
In addition, there can be no assurances that the Bulk Sales, including the
REMIC Transaction, will be consummated following the Closing or that the
Company's net proceeds from such transactions will be equal to the $393 million
assumed in the pro forma information herein. To the extent the amount of the
proceeds to be received on the Bulk Sales pursuant to the Bulk Sale Agreements,
together with the net proceeds received in the REMIC Transaction, differs from
such assumed amount, the net losses from such transactions will be different
from those reflected in the pro forma information, thereby affecting Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity at June 30, 1994. See "Risk Factors - Certain Considera-
tions Regarding the Restructuring and Recapitalization - Consummation of the
Bulk Sales." The Bank expects to incur a loss during the second quarter of
1994.
35
<PAGE>
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1994
AS AS
ADJUSTED FOR ADJUSTED FOR
RECAPITALI- RECAPITALI-
ZATION AND ZATION AND
RESTRUCTURING RESTRUCTURING
RESTRUCTURING OTHER THAN INCLUDING
OTHER THAN PRIMARY RECAPITALI- SECONDARY SECONDARY SECONDARY
HISTORICAL BULK SALES(A) BULK SALE(B) ZATION(C) BULK SALE BULK SALE(D) BULK SALE
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash $ 90,805 $(65,032) $ 31,070 $104,850 $ 161,693 $ 74,000 $ 235,693
Investment securities 95,601 - - - 95,601 - 95,601
Mortgage-backed securi-
ties 48,298 - - - 48,298 - 48,298
Loans held for sale 190,088 - - - 190,088 - 190,088
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Total 424,792 (65,032) 31,070 104,850 495,680 74,000 569,680
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Loans receivable:
Single family 502,395 - (485) - 501,910 (15,420) 486,490
2 to 4 units 438,814 - (16,227) - 422,587 (13,659) 408,928
5 to 36 units 1,785,100 - (102,329) - 1,682,771 (31,928) 1,650,843
37 units and over 409,877 - (103,632) - 306,245 (5,037) 301,208
Commercial and
industrial 300,393 - (52,695) - 247,698 (3,512) 244,186
Land 2,440 - - - 2,440 - 2,440
Nonmortgage loans 7,900 - - - 7,900 - 7,900
Loans in process,
unearned fees,
lower of cost or
market
adjustment, and other (10,867) - - - (10,867) - (10,867)
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Total loans 3,436,052 - (275,368) - 3,160,684 (69,556) 3,091,128
GVA (76,549) - 14,954 - (61,595) 3,595 (58,000)
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Net loans 3,359,503 - (260,414) 3,099,089 (65,961) 3,033,128
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Investment in FHLB and
FRB stock 52,626 - - - 52,626 - 52,626
Owned real estate 138,657 - (99,645) - 39,012 (22,462) 16,550
Premises and equipment,
net 52,188 (9,248) - - 42,940 - 42,940
Intangibles 1,813 - - - 1,813 - 1,813
Other assets 84,929 (1,057) - - 83,872 - 83,872
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Total assets $4,114,508 $(75,337) $(328,989) $104,850 $3,815,032 $(14,423) $3,800,609
========== ============= ============ =========== ============= ============ =============
Liabilities:
Deposits $3,171,306 $ (101) $ - $ - $3,171,205 $ - $3,171,205
FHLB Advances 342,700 - (20,000) - 322,700 - 322,700
Commercial paper 254,000 - (254,000) - - - -
Mortgage-backed notes 100,000 - - - 100,000 - 100,000
Other liabilities 19,575 (2,479) (4,657) - 12,439 (1,220) 11,219
Subordinated notes 60,000 (60,000) - - - - -
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Total liabilities 3,947,581 (62,580) (278,657) - 3,606,344 (1,220) 3,605,124
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock:
Class A and
Class C - - - 210 210 - 210
Class B - - - 66 66 - 66
Paid-in capital 70,689 - - 104,574 175,263 - 175,263
Unrealized loss on
securities
available for sale (1,206) - - - (1,206) - (1,206)
Retained earnings 97,444 (12,757) (50,332) - 34,355 (13,203) 21,152
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Total stockholders'
equity 166,927 (12,757) (50,332) 104,850 208,688 (13,203) 195,485
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -------------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $4,114,508 $(75,337) $(328,989) $104,850 $3,815,032 $(14,423) $3,800,609
========== ============= ============ =========== ============= ============ =============
</TABLE>
36
<PAGE>
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(A)Reflects the net pro forma impact on the Bank of the following components of
the Restructuring:
. The acquisition of the outstanding capital stock of Gateway from Cita-
del for $1.0 million cash, which amount is expected to approximate the book
value of such capital stock as of June 30, 1994.
. The dividend of the two Office Buildings which have an aggregate book
value of $9.3 million at March 31, 1994.
. The redemption of $60 million of Subordinated Notes outstanding at
March 31, 1994, subject to a settlement agreement among the lenders, Cita-
del and the Bank. The pro forma adjustment includes the payment of the $1.5
million Restructuring Fee and the recognition of $1.5 million of unamor-
tized issuance costs associated with the Subordinated Notes, net of tax
benefits, as well as the assumed payment of $2.65 million of accrued inter-
est outstanding at March 31, 1994. The amount of the Recapitalization Fee
could range from $1 million to $4.95 million, depending upon the amount of
the cash and non-cash consideration to be received or retained by Citadel
as part of the Restructuring and Recapitalization.
. The impact of the Success Fee remaining to be paid, plus an additional
advisory fee, which are expected to approximate $0.9 million, net of tax
benefits.
. The transfer of the D&O Litigation from the Bank to Citadel has no pro
forma effect.
(B)Reflects the Primary Bulk Sale (including the REMIC Transaction) and resul-
tant loss thereon, based on the following assumptions:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Assumed Net Proceeds from Primary Bulk Sale $319,000
Gross Book Value of Loans 298,441
Less Specific Reserves (9,143)
-------
Loans, Net of Specific Reserves 289,298
REO, Net of Specific Reserves 106,602
-------
Net Book Value of Primary Bulk Sale Assets 395,900
--------
Gross Loss from Primary Bulk Sale 76,900
Allocation of Loan and REO GVA (21,911)
--------
54,989
Tax Benefit (4,657)
--------
Loss on Primary Bulk Sale $ 50,332
========
</TABLE>
No pro forma effect has been given to contingent liabilities associated with
Bulk Sale Recourse Representations. This loss includes the loss incurred on the
sale of the Citadel Assets with a net book value of $22.9 million (net of allo-
cable REO GVA). Fidelity is assumed to have financed the Citadel Bulk Sale in
part through three loans to Citadel in the amount of $14 million secured by the
respective Citadel Assets. Additionally, these adjustments reflect the utiliza-
tion of the net proceeds from the Restructuring and Recapitalization other than
the Secondary Bulk Sale to repay $254 million of commercial paper and $20 mil-
lion of the Bank's outstanding FHLB Advances.
(C)The pro forma impact of the Recapitalization reflects the reclassification
of the Existing Common Stock into 6,595,624 shares of Class B Common Stock and
gross proceeds of $110 million from the issuance of 20,952,381 shares of Class
A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby at a price of $5.25 per
share, net of estimated placement fees and expenses of $5.15 million expected
to be incurred by the Bank in conjunction with this offering.
37
<PAGE>
(D)Reflects the Secondary Bulk Sale and resultant loss thereon, based on the
following assumptions:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Assumed Net Proceeds from Secondary Bulk Sale $74,000
Gross Book Value of Loans 73,359
Less Specific Reserves (3,803)
------
Loans, Net of Specific Reserves 69,556
REO, Net of Specific Reserves 24,029
------
Net Book Value of Secondary Bulk Sale Assets 93,585
-------
Gross Loss from Secondary Bulk Sale 19,585
Allocation of Loan and REO GVA (5,162)
-------
14,423
Tax Benefit (1,220)
-------
Loss on Secondary Bulk Sale $13,203
=======
</TABLE>
No pro forma effect has been given to contingent liabilities associated with
Bulk Sale Recourse Representations.
38
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the following as of March 31, 1994: (i) the
Bank's regulatory capital and ratios on an historical basis, (ii) the impact
thereon of the Restructuring other than the Bulk Sales, (iii) the impact
thereon of the Primary Bulk Sale, (iv) the impact thereon of the Recapitaliza-
tion, (v) the capital and ratios as adjusted to give effect to the Restructur-
ing and Recapitalization other than the Secondary Bulk Sale, (vi) the impact
thereon of the Secondary Bulk Sale, and (vii) the capital and ratios on a pro
forma basis giving effect to the Recapitalization and Restructuring including
the Bulk Sales.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------
HISTORICAL AND PCA REQUIREMENTS FOR EXCESS
PRO FORMA "WELL-CAPITALIZED" (DEFICIENT)
REGULATORY CAPITAL INSTITUTION CAPITAL
AMOUNT PERCENTAGE(1) AMOUNT PERCENTAGE AMOUNT
--------- ------------- --------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
CORE CAPITAL TO ADJUSTED
TOTAL ASSETS:
Actual March 31, 1994
Levels $166,700 4.04% $206,300 5.00% $ (39,600)
Impact of:
Restructuring other
than the Bulk Sales (12,800) (0.24)% (3,800) (9,000)
Primary Bulk Sale (50,300) (0.92)% (16,400) (33,900)
Recapitalization 104,900 2.57% 5,300 99,600
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
As Adjusted for Recap-
italization and Re-
structuring other
than Secondary Bulk
Sale 208,500 5.45% 191,400 5.00% 17,100
Impact of the Second-
ary Bulk Sale (13,200) (0.33)% (800) (12,400)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Pro forma March 31, 1994 $195,300 5.12% $190,600 5.00% $ 4,700
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
CORE CAPITAL TO RISK-
WEIGHTED ASSETS:
Actual March 31, 1994
Levels $166,700 5.98% $167,200 6.00% $ (500)
Impact of:
Restructuring other
than the Bulk Sales (12,800) (0.37)% (3,000) (9,800)
Primary Bulk Sale (50,300) (1.31)% (14,800) (35,500)
Recapitalization 104,900 4.07% - 104,900
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
As Adjusted for Recap-
italization and Re-
structuring other
than Secondary Bulk
Sale 208,500 8.37% 149,400 6.00% 59,100
Impact of the Second-
ary Bulk Sale (13,200) (0.48)% (900) (12,300)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Pro forma March 31, 1994 $195,300 7.89% $148,500 6.00% $ 46,800
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
TOTAL CAPITAL TO RISK-
WEIGHTED ASSETS:
Actual March 31, 1994
Levels $253,500 9.10% $278,700 10.00% $ (25,200)
Impact of:
Restructuring other
than the Bulk Sales (72,000) (2.16)% (4,900) (67,100)
Primary Bulk Sale (47,100) (0.73)% (24,700) (22,400)
Recapitalization 104,900 3.40%(2) - 104,900
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
As Adjusted for Recap-
italization and Re-
structuring other
than Secondary Bulk
Sale 239,300 9.61% 249,100 10.00% (9,800)
Impact of the Second-
ary Bulk Sale (13,400) (0.49)%(2) (1,500) (11,900)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Pro forma March 31, 1994 $225,900 9.12%(3) $247,600 10.00% $ (21,700)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
- - - -------
(1)These ratios set forth above represent the respective capital levels to
"adjusted total assets" as defined in 12 C.F.R. Section 567.1(a) for
purposes of core capital to adjusted total assets and for purposes of core
capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets, these ratios represent
the respective capital levels to "risk-weighted assets" as defined in 12
C.F.R. Section 567.1(bb).
(2)The pro forma regulatory capital percentages for the impacts of the Primary
and Secondary Bulk Sales include amounts of $29 million and $40 million, re-
spectively, in risk-weighted assets as a result of certain recourse
provisions in such sales. These recourse provisions expire 60 days from the
closing of such sales and the Bank is required to hold total capital
against such assets until such time. See "Restructuring and
Recapitalization - Restructuring - Bulk Sales."
(3)The pro forma regulatory capital percentage for total risk-based capital
reflects an amount of $38.5 million of income tax refund receivable at March
31, 1994, in the 0% risk-weighted category as such funds were received in
April 1994.
The pro forma regulatory capital and ratios in the preceding table do not re-
flect the results of operations of the Bank since March 31, 1994, any changes
in the amount and composition of the Bank's assets since that date or any other
changes that would require additional regulatory capital. Accordingly, the pro
forma regulatory capital and ratios shown should not be construed as actual or
projected for the Bank's capital levels as of any specific date. No assurance
can be given that there have not been any changes since March 31, 1994, that
will require additional regulatory capital.
39
<PAGE>
PRO FORMA IMPACT OF THE BULK SALES ON
LOANS AND OTHER REAL ESTATE ASSETS
The table below sets forth the pro forma impact of the Bulk Sales on the Bank's
loans and other real estate assets as of March 31, 1994. The pro forma table
only contemplates the impact of the Bulk Sales. The table does not reflect any
other sales activity or addition to loans or other real estate assets after
March 31, 1994.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------
AT MARCH 31, 1994
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
BALANCE AT PRIMARY AS ADJUSTED SECONDARY AS ADJUSTED
MARCH 31, BULK SALE FOR PRIMARY BULK SALE FOR BULK
1994 IMPACT BULK SALE IMPACT SALES
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
NONPERFORMING LOANS:
Single Family Residence $ 17,018 $ (485) $ 16,533 $(14,257) $ 2,276
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 18,766 (6,558) 12,208 (12,196) 12
5 to 36 Units 54,742 (23,272) 31,470 (30,611) 859
37 Units and over 35,346 (30,545) 4,801 (5,037) (236)
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
108,854 (60,375) 48,479 (47,844) 635
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Commercial & other 14,666 (14,114) 552 (552) --
Less: Deferred Interest
Reserve (1,162) -- (1,162) -- (1,162)
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
139,376 (74,974) 64,402 (62,653) 1,749
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
REAL ESTATE OWNED:
Single Family Residence 7,185 (713) 6,472 (5,288) 1,184
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 10,397 -- 10,397 (5,898) 4,499
5 to 36 Units 44,026 (25,817) 18,209 (10,157) 8,052
37 Units and over 43,333 (42,289) 1,044 (1,044) --
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
97,756 (68,106) 29,650 (17,099) 12,551
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Commercial & other 30,170 (26,013) 4,157 (1,642) 2,515
Less: REO GVA (8,524) 6,957 (1,567) 1,567 --
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
126,587 (87,875) 38,712 (22,462) 16,250(1)
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Total Nonperforming As-
sets 265,963 (162,849) 103,114 (85,115) 17,999
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
OTHER CLASSIFIED LOANS
(LOANS WITH INCREASED
RISK):
Single Family Residence 2,720 -- 2,720 (78) 2,642
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 4,880 (1,344) 3,536 (1,303) 2,233
5 to 36 Units 53,649 (26,677) 26,772 -- 26,772
37 Units and over 39,858 (36,236) 3,622 -- 3,622
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
98,387 (64,457) 33,930 (1,303) 32,627
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Commercial & other 11,680 (3,939) 7,741 (2,960) 4,781
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
112,787 (68,396) 44,391 (4,341) 40,050
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
</TABLE>
- - - -------
(1) Included in the $16.3 million of REO remaining on a pro forma basis at
March 31, 1994, after giving effect to the Bulk Sales, are properties (i)
with a net book value of $6.1 million sold through June 6, 1994, (ii) with
a net book value of $2.4 million which are in escrow scheduled to be sold
in June and July 1994, (iii) with a net book value of $3.4 million which
may but will probably not be sold by July 31, 1994 and (iv) with a net book
value of $4.4 million which are subject to agreements, such as participa-
tion agreements and servicing agreements, or are involved in litigation,
which preclude immediate disposition.
40
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1994
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
BALANCE AT PRIMARY AS ADJUSTED SECONDARY
MARCH 31, BULK SALE FOR PRIMARY BULK SALE AS ADJUSTED
1994 IMPACT BULK SALE IMPACT FOR BULK SALES
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT:
Single Family Residence $ 203 $ (203) $ - $ - $ -
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units - - - - -
5 to 36 Units - - - - -
37 Units and over - - - - -
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
- - - - -
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
Commercial & other 11,567 (11,567) - - -
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
11,770 (11,770) - - -
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
Total Classified Assets 390,520 (243,015) 147,505 (89,456) 58,049
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
SPECIAL MENTION LOANS:
Single Family Residence 32,365 - 32,365 (187) 32,178
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 8,826 (304) 8,522 - 8,522
5 to 36 Units 160,174 (35,185) 124,989 (1,317) 123,672
37 Units and over 75,138 (29,446) 45,692 - 45,692
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
244,138 (64,935) 179,203 (1,317) 177,886
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
Commercial & other 35,255 (11,954) 23,301 - 23,301
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
Total Special Mention
Loans 311,758 (76,889) 234,869 (1,504) 233,365(1)
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
Total Criticized Assets 702,278 (319,904) 382,374 (90,960) 291,414
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
PASS LOANS:
Single Family Residence 641,430 - 641,430 (898) 640,532
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 406,342 (8,021) 398,321 (160) 398,161
5 to 36 Units 1,516,535 (16,995) 1,499,540 - 1,499,540
37 Units and over 259,535 (7,381) 252,154 - 252,154
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
2,182,412 (32,397) 2,150,015 (160) 2,149,855
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
Commercial & other 240,202 (22,687) 217,515 - 217,515
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
3,064,044 (55,084) 3,008,960 (1,058) 3,007,902
---------- --------- ----------- --------- --------------
TOTAL LOANS & REO $3,766,322 $(374,988) $3,391,334 $(92,018) $3,299,316
========== ========= =========== ========= ==============
Ratio of NPAs to Total
Assets 6.46% - 2.70% - 0.47%
Ratio of GVA for Loans to
NPLs 54.92% - 95.64% - 3316.18%
Ratio of GVA to NPAs 30.99% - 60.34% - 322.24%
Ratio of GVA for Loans to
Classified Loans 30.36% - 56.62% - 138.76%
Ratio of GVA for Loans to
Total Loans 2.16% - 1.80% - 1.71%
Ratio of Classified Loans
to Total Loans 7.11% - 3.31% - 1.30%
Ratio of Classified Loans
and REO to Total Assets 9.48% - 3.86% - 1.53%
</TABLE>
(1) Of the total $233.4 million net book value of special mention assets,
$140.6 million are included in the total pool of earthquake-affected loans
warranting modification negotiations. The status of these earthquake-af-
fected loans as of May 31, 1994, is as follows: (i) $61.8 million of loans
are subject to signed accommodation agreements, (ii) accommodations for
$30.7 million of loans have been approved and documented by the Bank but
such documents have not yet been executed and returned to the Bank by the
borrowers, (iii) $39.3 million of loans are in negotiations which are ex-
pected to be completed in the near future and (iv) $8.8 million of loans
may require, in management's belief, TDR treatment and possibly specific
reserves.
41
<PAGE>
The table below sets forth the pro forma impact of the Bulk Sales on the Bank's
delinquent loans. The pro forma table only contemplates the impact of the Bulk
Sales and does not reflect any other sales activity or addition to loans after
March 31, 1994. The table is also adjusted for accommodations made to qualify-
ing earthquake-affected borrowers.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT MARCH 31, 1994
PRO FORMA PRO FORMA IMPACT OF
BALANCE AT PRIMARY AS ADJUSTED SECONDARY EARTHQUAKE AS ADJUSTED
MARCH 31, BULK SALE FOR PRIMARY BULK SALE AS ADJUSTED ACCOMMODATIONS FOR EARTHQUAKE
1994 IMPACT BULK SALE IMPACT FOR BULK SALES (1) ACCOMMODATIONS
---------- --------- ----------- --------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
30-59 DAYS:
Single Family Residence
Multifamily: $ 23,225 $ - $ 23,225 $ (187) $ 23,038 $ (12,235) $10,803
2 to 4 Units 4,954 - 4,954 - 4,954 (1,796) 3,158
5 to 36 Units 114,747 (14,618) 100,129 (787) 99,342 (68,935) 30,407
37 Units and over 48,286 (15,583) 32,703 - 32,703 (23,159) 9,544
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
167,987 (30,201) 137,786 (787) 136,999 (93,890) 43,109
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
Commercial & Industrial 15,525 (1,726) 13,799 (160) 13,639 (7,914) 5,725
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
$206,737 $ (31,927) $174,810 $ (1,134) $173,676 $(114,039) $59,637
======== ========= ======== ======== ======== ========= =======
60-89 DAYS:
Single Family Residence $ 6,355 $ (321) $ 6,034 $ (78) $ 5,956 $ (750) $ 5,206
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 3,413 - 3,413 - 3,413 (639) 2,774
5 to 36 Units 15,875 (5,553) 10,322 - 10,322 - 10,322
37 Units and over 7,341 (1,452) 5,889 - 5,889 (3,458) 2,431
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
26,629 (7,005) 19,624 - 19,624 (4,097) 15,527
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
Commercial & Industrial 4,321 - 4,321 - 4,321 - 4,321
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
$ 37,305 $ (7,326) $ 29,979 $ (78) $ 29,901 $ (4,847) $25,054
======== ========= ======== ======== ======== ========= =======
90 DAYS AND OVER:
Single Family Residence $ 16,698 $ (164) $ 16,534 $(14,257) $ 2,277 $ - $ 2,277
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 18,766 (6,559) 12,207 (12,197) 10 - 10
5 to 36 Units 54,243 (23,272) 30,971 (30,112) 859 - 859
37 Units and over 35,346 (30,545) 4,801 (5,036) (235) - (235)
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
108,355 (60,376) 47,979 (47,345) 634 - 634
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
Commercial & Industrial 4,358 (3,806) 552 (552) - - -
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
$129,411 $ (64,346) $ 65,065 $(62,154) $ 2,911 $ - $ 2,911
======== ========= ======== ======== ======== ========= =======
TOTAL DELINQUENT LOANS:
Single Family Residence $ 46,278 $ (485) $ 45,793 $(15,522) $ 31,271 $ (12,985) $18,286
Multifamily:
2 to 4 Units 27,133 (6,559) 20,574 (12,197) 8,377 (2,435) 5,942
5 to 36 Units 184,865 (43,443) 141,422 (30,899) 110,523 (68,935) 41,588
37 Units and over 90,973 (47,580) 43,393 (5,036) 38,357 (26,617) 11,740
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
302,971 (97,582) 205,389 (48,132) 157,257 (97,987) 59,270
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
Commercial & Industrial 24,204 (5,532) 18,672 (712) 17,960 (7,914) 10,048
-------- --------- -------- -------- -------- --------- -------
$373,453 $(103,599) $269,854 $(63,366) $206,488 $(118,886) $87,604
======== ========= ======== ======== ======== ========= =======
</TABLE>
- - - -------
(1) Includes only loans (other than loans in the Earthquake TDR Pool) that are
not delinquent as of May 31, 1994 in accordance with the terms of their re-
spective accommodations. Of the total $118.9 million, (i) $58.7 million of
loans are subject to signed accommodation agreements, (ii) accommodations
for $30.7 million of loans have been approved and documented by the Bank
but such documents have not yet been executed and returned to the Bank by
the borrowers and (iii) $29.5 million of loans are in negotiations which
are expected to be completed in the near future.
42
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condi-
tion, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources of Fidelity. This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated fi-
nancial statements of Fidelity and its subsidiaries and the notes thereto ap-
pearing elsewhere in this Offering Circular.
The consummation of the Restructuring and Recapitalization described herein is
expected to have a significant impact on the operations of the Bank. According-
ly, the financial results of the Company following the Closing are expected to
differ significantly from those of the Bank prior to the Closing and the re-
sults of operations and financial condition for the periods prior to the Clos-
ing are not necessarily indicative of results of operations and financial con-
dition for future periods.
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 COMPARED WITH THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 AND MARCH 31, 1993
NET EARNINGS
Fidelity had a net loss of $14.2 million for the first quarter of 1994 compared
to net earnings of $0.2 million for the first quarter of 1993 and a net loss of
$37.0 million for the fourth quarter of 1993. The following table summarizes
the Bank's results:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1994 1993 1993
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes $(21,776) $(55,670) $477
Net earnings (loss) $(14,151) $(37,002) $206
Return on average equity (32.42)% (75.60)% 0.36%
Return on average assets (1.33)% (3.24)% 0.02%
</TABLE>
The components of the change in net earnings are shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE) VARIANCE
1ST QTR 1994 1ST QTR 1994
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
1ST QTR 1993 4TH QTR 1993
---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest income $ (3,374) $ 5,438
Provision for estimated loan losses (8,100) 8,000
---------------- ----------------
Net interest income after loan loss provi-
sion (11,474) 13,438
---------------- ----------------
Fee income and other income (111) 1,177
Provision for estimated real estate losses (3,300) 4,900
Direct costs of real estate operations,
net 1,261 2,458
Gain/loss on sale of loans (3,199) (2,412)
Gain/loss on sale of securities (292) 2,827
---------------- ----------------
Noninterest income/expense (5,641) 8,950
Operating expense (5,138) 11,506
---------------- ----------------
Earnings/loss before income taxes (22,253) 33,894
Income tax expense/benefit 7,896 (11,043)
---------------- ----------------
Net earnings/loss $(14,357) $ 22,851
================ ================
</TABLE>
43
<PAGE>
The $22.3 million change in earnings/loss before taxes for the first quarter of
1994 compared to the first quarter of 1993 was primarily due to (a) increased
provisions for loan and real estate losses of $11.4 million; (b) increased op-
erating expenses of $5.1 million; (c) decreased net interest income of $3.4
million; and (d) decreased loan sale gains of $3.2 million. These were par-
tially offset by decreased direct costs related to real estate operations of
$1.3 million. The $5.1 million increase in operating expense was attributable
in part to increased staffing levels required to manage rising problem assets
and to handle increased financial services offered at the retail branch net-
work. The increase was also attributable to certain nonrecurring charges in-
curred in connection with the Company's internal reorganization and restructur-
ing plans. The $3.2 million decrease in loan sale gains was primarily due to a
$1.9 million loss on the sale of $155.3 million of single family and multifam-
ily 2 to 4 unit performing loans in the first quarter of 1994 as part of the
Bank's overall capital planning.
The $33.9 million change in earnings/loss before income taxes for the first
quarter of 1994 compared to the fourth quarter of 1993 was primarily due to (a)
a decrease in the provision for loan and real estate losses of $12.9 million;
(b) decreased operating expenses of $11.5 million, primarily caused by an $8.8
million write-off of goodwill in the fourth quarter of 1993 and decreased ex-
penses in the first quarter of 1994 associated with the Company's internal re-
organization and restructuring plans and (c) a $5.4 million increase in net in-
terest income, primarily attributable to a $5.2 million write-off of core de-
posit intangibles in the fourth quarter of 1993.
The Bank's expected effective tax rate was approximately 42.5% of pre-tax in-
come. The actual effective tax rate of 56.8% for the first quarter 1993 re-
sulted from the near breakeven level of pre-tax income in the period. The ac-
tual effective tax rate of 33.6% on pre-tax losses in the fourth quarter of
1993, reflected a decrease in allowable state tax benefits due to restrictions
concerning operating losses. The actual effective tax rate of 35.0% on pre-tax
losses for the first quarter of 1994 reflects a reduction of tax benefits due
to state restrictions concerning operating losses and an increase in tax bene-
fits resulting from favorable court decisions, and changes in income tax regu-
lations and IRS revenue procedures that reduced the Bank's previously accrued
liability for income taxes. Excluding the benefits allowed during the current
period related to previously accrued liabilities, the Bank's effective tax rate
for the current period would have been approximately 17.0%.
The following table summarizes certain regulatory capital and asset quality in-
formation for Fidelity as of the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1994 1993 1993
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Core Capital $166,700 $182,100 $222,400
Core Capital Ratio 4.04% 4.15% 4.70%
NPAs to Total Assets 6.46% 5.37% 5.72%
Nonaccruing Loans to NPAs(1) 52.40% 39.67% 46.50%
REO and ISF to NPAs(1) 47.60% 60.33% 53.50%
GVA $ 85,073 $ 80,020 $ 74,977
GVA to Loans, REO and ISF(1) 2.26% 2.03% 1.81%
GVA to NPAs 30.99% 32.79% 26.56%
</TABLE>
(1) The Company implemented SFAS No. 114 in the first quarter of 1994. Loans
that would have been considered ISF are included in the loan category be-
ginning in 1994.
For additional information, see "Asset Quality."
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on inter-
est-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
Stated differently, the level of net interest income is the sum of (a) the in-
terest rate margin (the difference between the yield earned on the interest-
earning assets and the rate paid on the interest-bearing liabilities) multi-
plied by the amount of interest-earning assets; plus (b) the excess balance of
interest-earning assets over interest- bearing liabilities multiplied by the
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Therefore, the higher the yield on
interest- earning assets relative to the rate paid on interest-bearing liabili-
ties, the higher the net interest income. Conversely, the
44
<PAGE>
lower the yield on interest-earning assets relative to the rate paid on inter-
est-bearing liabilities, the lower the net interest income. Similarly, the
smaller the level of interest-earning assets relative to the level of interest-
bearing liabilities, the smaller the net interest income. As a result, net in-
terest income between two periods will decline if the interest rate margin de-
clines, the excess of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities
declines, interest-earning assets decline or the rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities increases. The converse also holds true.
In a period of increased loan defaults, interest-earning assets tend to decline
faster than interest-bearing liabilities, which in turn tends to depress net
interest income. As a result, a higher interest rate margin would be needed to
maintain a constant level of net interest income. In a period of declining in-
terest rates, prepayments on mortgages tend to increase and as a result, the
level of interest-earning assets will decline if the volume of new loan origi-
nations held in the portfolio does not increase to offset the increased level
of prepayments. The decline in net interest income is partially offset by the
decline in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
The change in net interest income is a result of: (a) the change in interest-
earning assets multiplied by the current interest rate margin, plus (b) the
change in the interest rate margin multiplied by prior interest-earning assets,
plus (c) the change in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities multiplied
by the current excess balance of interest-earning assets over interest-bearing
liabilities, plus (d) the change in the excess balance of interest-earning as-
sets over interest-bearing liabilities multiplied by the prior rate paid on in-
terest-bearing liabilities.
In addition, net interest income is affected by the level of nonperforming
loans. The Bank generally places loans on nonaccrual status whenever the pay-
ment of interest is 90 or more days delinquent or when the Bank believes they
exhibit materially deficient characteristics. The reduction in income related
to nonaccruing loans was approximately $3.2 million, $2.1 million, and $2.0
million for the three months ended March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993 and March
31, 1993, respectively.
Net interest income for the first quarter of 1994 of $25.4 million decreased by
$3.4 million or 11.7% from $28.8 million for the first quarter of 1993. This
$3.4 million decrease resulted from a 10.2% decrease in average interest-earn-
ing assets partially offset by a 7 basis point increase in the interest rate
margin from 2.41% to 2.48%. Between the first quarters of 1994 and 1993, the
Bank experienced a $102.1 million decrease in the level of average interest-
earning assets over interest-bearing liabilities from $107.5 million to $5.4
million.
Net interest income increased between the fourth quarter 1993 and the first
quarter 1994 by $5.4 million or 27.2%. This increase was primarily due to (a) a
$5.2 million writedown of core deposit intangibles ("CDI") that occurred in the
fourth quarter 1993 with no comparable writedown in the first quarter 1994 and
(b) a 19 basis point increase in the interest rate margin from 2.29% to 2.48%,
partially offset by an 8.3% decrease in average interest-earning assets. The
Bank also experienced a $35.4 million decline in the level of average interest-
earning assets over the level of average interest-bearing liabilities from
$40.8 million to $5.4 million. The decrease in average interest-earning assets
was due to loan sales of $210.3 million completed in the first quarter of 1994.
In addition, net interest income is affected by the composition, quality and
type of interest-earnings assets and by the level of NPAs. NPAs decreased from
$271.7 million at March 31, 1993 to $235.6 million at December 31, 1993. The
high level of foreclosures, coupled with an increase in delinquent loans in the
90 days and over category and a decline in the pace of disposition of real es-
tate owned because of the proposed restructurings and effects of the Northridge
earthquake, pushed NPAs to $266.0 million at March 31, 1994. See "Asset Quali-
ty" for further discussion. As the level of NPAs increased, the Bank's net in-
terest income, interest rate margin and operating results were negatively im-
pacted.
45
<PAGE>
The following table displays the components of Fidelity's interest rate margin
at the end of, and for each period, as well as the effective yield for each pe-
riod.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------
AT OR FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1994 DECEMBER 31, 1993 MARCH 31, 1993
RATE AT RATE RATE AT RATE RATE AT RATE
END OF FOR THE END OF FOR THE END OF FOR THE
PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average yield
on:
Loans 6.34% 6.48% 6.49% 6.56% 6.97% 7.23%
Mortgage-backed
securities 5.31% 5.71% 5.20% 4.13% 5.97% 6.01%
Investments 4.59% 4.94% 4.28% 4.17% 4.66% 3.17%
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Interest-earning as-
sets 6.27% 6.39% 6.38% 6.26% 6.78% 7.01%
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Weighted average cost
of:
Deposits 3.51% 3.65% 3.91% 3.74% 4.00% 4.07%
Borrowings 4.94% 4.92% 5.08% 4.73% 5.51% 6.29%
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Interest-bearing
liabilities 3.79% 3.91% 4.14% 3.97% 4.40% 4.60%
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Interest rate margin 2.48% 2.48% 2.24% 2.29% 2.38% 2.41%
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Effective yield 2.46% 2.49% 2.21% 2.33% 2.37% 2.52%
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The change in the interest rate margin can be attributed to the lagging rela-
tionship between the repricing of assets and liabilities as market interest
rates stabilize. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities adjusts
to market rates faster than the average rate earned on interest-earning assets.
This difference in the speed of adjustment to changes in market interest rates
is primarily due to the nature of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of San
Francisco Eleventh District Cost of Funds Index ("COFI") to which most of the
Bank's loans are tied, the contractual repricing terms of the loans held in the
portfolio, the advance notification requirements to certain borrowers for any
rate change, the time lag in the availability of the actual index, and the
amount of the lifetime interest rate caps. As a result of these factors,
changes in the yield on COFI-based loans lag changes in market interest rates.
The Federal Reserve Board ("FRB") increased the federal funds rate by 0.25% in
February 1994, by another 0.25% in March 1994 and by an additional 0.50% in May
1994. Such increases may be indicative of future reductions in the Bank's net
interest margins.
The interest rate margin of the Bank increases in a period of steady decline in
interest rates, since the yield on interest- bearing assets drops more slowly
than the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Conversely, as market in-
terest rates begin to stabilize and then increase, the interest rate margin of
the Bank may shrink, other conditions being equal. This factor, together with
the timing of asset repricing and the increase in NPAs, resulted in a reduction
in the yield on loans in the first quarter 1994 of 8 basis points and 75 basis
points compared to the fourth quarter of 1993 and the first quarter of 1993,
respectively. Decreased market interest rates resulted in a reduction in the
cost of funds in the first quarter of 1994 of 6 and 69 basis points from the
fourth quarter of 1993 and the first quarter of 1993, respectively.
NONINTEREST INCOME
Noninterest income has three major components: (a) gains and losses on the sale
of loans and fee income associated with other ongoing operations, such as mis-
cellaneous loan fees, service charges on transaction accounts and fees earned
on the sale by Gateway of securities and annuities (prior to 1993) or otherwise
derived from Gateway (thereafter), (b) income/ expenses associated with owned
real estate, which includes both the provision for real estate losses as well
as income/ expenses experienced by the Bank related to the operations of its
owned real estate properties (e.g., maintenance expenses, capital expenditures
and payment of current and delinquent property taxes), and (c) gains and losses
on the sale of investment securities and mortgage-backed securities. The last
two items can fluctuate widely, and could therefore mask the underlying fee
generating performance of the Bank on an ongoing basis.
46
<PAGE>
The following table details noninterest income/expense for these periods:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1994 1993 1993
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Miscellaneous loan and other fee in-
come $ 1,199 $ 670 $ 2,018
Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net (2,804) (392) 395
Fees from Gateway 591 - -
Fee income from deposits and other in-
come 906 849 789
--------- ------------ ---------
(108) 1,127 3,202
--------- ------------ ---------
Provision for estimated real estate
losses (4,300) (9,200) (1,000)
Direct costs of real estate opera-
tions, net (2,057) (4,515) (3,318)
--------- ------------ ---------
(6,357) (13,715) (4,318)
--------- ------------ ---------
Loss on sale of mortgage-backed secu-
rities, net (621) (1,118) -
Gain (loss) on sale of investment se-
curities, net 329 (2,001) -
--------- ------------ ---------
(292) (3,119) -
--------- ------------ ---------
Total noninterest income (expense) $(6,757) $(15,707) $(1,116)
========= ============ =========
</TABLE>
The following table details the variance between the periods:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE) VARIANCE
1ST QTR 1994 1ST QTR 1994
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
1ST QTR 1993 4TH QTR 1993
----------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Miscellaneous loan and other fee income $ (819) $ 529
Gain/loss on sale of loans, net (3,199) (2,412)
Fee income from investment products 591 591
Fee income from deposits and other income 117 57
---------------- ----------------
(3,310) (1,235)
---------------- ----------------
Provision for estimated real estate losses (3,300) 4,900
Direct costs of real estate operations,
net 1,261 2,458
---------------- ----------------
(2,039) 7,358
---------------- ----------------
Gain/loss on sale of mortgage-backed secu-
rities, net (621) 497
Gain/loss on sale of investment securi-
ties, net 329 2,330
---------------- ----------------
(292) 2,827
---------------- ----------------
Total noninterest income/expense $(5,641) $ 8,950
================ ================
</TABLE>
Noninterest income from ongoing operations decreased by $3.3 million, to a loss
of $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 1994, from income of
$3.2 million for the comparable period in 1993. This decrease was primarily due
to a decrease of $3.2 million in gains on sale of loans which totaled $0.4 mil-
lion for the first three months of 1993 as compared to a loss of $2.8 million
for the same period in 1994. This loss resulted from the sale of $155.3 million
in single family and multifamily 2 to 4 unit performing ARM loans at a loss of
$1.9 million in the first quarter of 1994 as part of the Bank's overall capital
planning and the sale of an additional $55.0 million of fixed rate single fam-
ily and multifamily 2 to 4 unit loans at a loss of $0.2 million.
47
<PAGE>
Noninterest income from ongoing operations for the three months ended March 31,
1994, also decreased as compared to the three months ended December 31, 1993,
by $1.2 million. This decrease was due to increased losses on sales of loans of
$2.4 million, partially offset by (a) an increase in miscellaneous loan and
other fee income of $0.5 million; and (b) an increase of $0.5 million in fee
income from Gateway.
Foreclosure activities continued to remain high, resulting in an increase in
real estate owned, both in terms of numbers of properties and total dollars.
During the first quarter of 1994, the Bank foreclosed on 93 properties with a
gross book value of $38.0 million, compared to 47 properties with a gross book
value of $55.3 million in the same period of 1993. During the quarter ended De-
cember 31, 1993, the Bank foreclosed on 78 properties with a gross book value
of $44.4 million.
The following table details the changes in the components of Fidelity's results
of real estate operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1994 MARCH 31, 1994
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
MARCH 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1993
-------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Increase (decrease)
in:
Provision for esti-
mated real estate
losses $ 3,300 $(4,900)
============== =================
Direct costs of real
estate operations,
net $(1,261) $(2,458)
============== =================
</TABLE>
The following table provides a comparison of the net book value and number of
properties at given dates:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1994 MARCH 31, 1994
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
MARCH 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1993
-------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Owned real estate, net book value:
March 31, 1994 $138,357 $138,357
Comparative period(1) 156,152 153,307
-------------- -----------------
Decrease $ (17,795) $ (14,950)
============== =================
Number of real estate properties owned:
March 31, 1994 269 269
Comparative period(1) 178 240
-------------- -----------------
Increase 91 29
============== =================
</TABLE>
(1) Includes 29 loans considered ISF totaling $28.4 million at December 31,
1993 and 12 loans amounting to $29.6 million at March 31, 1993. The ISF
designation was effectively eliminated upon the Company's implementation of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 114 issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board in the first quarter of 1994, and
loans that would have been considered ISF are included in the loan category
beginning in 1994.
The Bank has a policy of providing general valuation allowances for both esti-
mated loan and real estate losses, in addition to valuation allowances on spe-
cific loans and REO, in response to the continuing deterioration of the quality
of the Bank's loan and REO portfolio. See "Asset Quality" below for further de-
tail.
48
<PAGE>
OPERATING EXPENSE
The following table details the operating expenses for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1994 1993 1993
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Personnel and benefits $ 13,151 $ 13,070 $ 10,820
Occupancy 3,495 3,710 2,982
FDIC insurance 2,482 2,427 1,887
Professional services 3,112 5,443 1,510
Office-related expenses 1,656 2,070 1,283
Marketing expense 648 685 683
Amortization of intangibles 7 8,893 118
Other general and administrative 893 868 714
--------- ------------ ---------
Total before capitalized costs 25,444 37,166 19,997
Capitalized costs (619) (835) (310)
--------- ------------ ---------
Total operating expenses $ 24,825 $ 36,331 $ 19,687
========= ============ =========
Efficiency ratio(1) 86.41% 91.05% 61.56%
========= ============ =========
Operating expense ratio(2) 1.85% 3.19% 1.70%
========= ============ =========
</TABLE>
(1) The efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense by net
interest income and noninterest income, excluding nonrecurring items, pro-
visions for estimated loan and real estate losses, real estate operations
on specific properties and gains/losses on the sale of securities.
(2) The operating expense ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense
by average total assets.
The following table presents the variances of operating expenses between the
first quarter of 1994 compared to each of the quarters ended March 31, 1993 and
December 31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE) VARIANCE
1ST QTR 1994 1ST QTR 1994
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
1ST QTR 1993 4TH QTR 1993
---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Personnel and benefits $(2,331) $ (81)
Occupancy (513) 215
FDIC insurance (595) (55)
Professional services (1,602) 2,331
Office-related expenses (373) 414
Marketing expenses 35 37
Amortization of intangibles 111 8,886
Other (179) (25)
---------------- ----------------
Total before capitalized costs (5,447) 11,722
Capitalized costs 309 (216)
---------------- ----------------
Total operating expenses $(5,138) $11,506
================ ================
</TABLE>
49
<PAGE>
The increase in personnel and benefits from the first quarter of 1993 to the
same period in 1994, was primarily due to increased temporary help, severance
expenses and increased staffing levels. The increased staffing levels were due
to(a) increased staffing required to manage the rising problem asset portfolio
and to strengthen the internal asset review function, (b) increased staffing
levels in the retail branch network to support the new strategies of customer
orientation and retail financial services focus, and (c) increased staffing
levels in the mortgage banking network to expand the origination and sale of
residential mortgages. These increases were partially offset by the reduction
of data processing personnel in connection with the outsourcing of substan-
tially all of the information systems functions in May 1993. The staffing
level in the retail network increased due to improved ability to fill open po-
sitions and to support an increased emphasis on providing investment products
to customers. The staffing level in the mortgage banking network also in-
creased to support the increased emphasis on meeting a broader range of cus-
tomer real estate borrowing requirements. In the first quarter of 1994, aver-
age full time equivalent employees ("FTEs") were 942 compared to 908 and 891
for the quarters ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively. As
discussed in the Offering Circular Summary under "The Company," management has
identified substantial cost-reduction opportunities via consolidation of
redundant functions, reduction in management and staffing levels, closing,
consolidating or selling of certain branches and outsourcing of certain staff
functions. Management believes that operating expenses could be reduced in the
future.
Occupancy costs increased in the first quarter of 1994 compared to the same
period in 1993, primarily due to higher depreciation expense related to addi-
tions of computer equipment and work stations in 1993 and software development
costs in the first quarter of 1994.
The Bank's FDIC insurance premium is based upon three factors: (a) the volume
of insured deposits, (b) the rate at which the FDIC assesses the deposits, and
(c) any other adjustments or credits the FDIC may allow. In the first quarter
of 1993, the FDIC insurance premium was reduced by the application of the sec-
ondary reserve credit. The increase in the FDIC insurance premium in the first
quarter of 1994 compared to the same period in 1993 was primarily due to the
1993 reduced expense discussed above and the increase in the assessment rate
which was partially offset by a decrease in deposits.
Professional services increased in the three months ended March 31, 1994 over
the comparable three month period in 1993. The increase was primarily due to
financial advisory and legal fees associated with developing and implementing
restructuring and recapitalization plans and in the related asset valuation
process, as well as the outsourcing of data processing services which began in
May 1993. Professional services decreased in the first quarter of 1994 as com-
pared to the prior quarter, primarily due to lower financial advisory and le-
gal fees associated with the restructuring and recapitalization plans. The re-
structuring expenses totaled $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
1994, compared to $3.0 million and no expenses for the three months ended De-
cember 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively. Expenses associated with
outsourcing data processing services totaled $1.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 1994, as compared to $1.4 million and no expenses for the
three months ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively.
The increase in office-related expenses in the first quarter of 1994 from the
same period of 1993 was primarily due to the higher staffing levels and re-
lated expenses necessary for the contemplated restructuring plans.
Amortization of intangibles decreased in the three months ended March 31,
1994, as compared to the three months ended December 31, 1993 and the three
months ended March 31, 1993, primarily due to the December 1993 write-off of
$8.8 million representing the remaining balance of goodwill related to the ac-
quisition of Mariners Savings and Loan ("Mariners") in 1978.
The ratio of operating expenses to average assets improved from 3.19% for the
quarter ended December 31, 1993 and worsened from 1.70% for the quarter ended
March 31, 1993 to 1.85% for the quarter ended March 31, 1994. The operating
expense ratio is sensitive to the changes in operating expenses and the size
of the balance sheet. Average assets of the Bank decreased to $4.3 billion for
the quarter ended March 31, 1994 from $4.6 billion for the quarters ended De-
cember 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993.
50
<PAGE>
EFFICIENCY RATIO
Management analyzes trends in the efficiency ratio to assess the changing rela-
tionship between operating expenses and income generated. The efficiency ratio
measures the amount of cost expended by the Bank to generate a given level of
revenues in the normal course of business. It is computed by dividing total op-
erating expense by net interest income and noninterest income, excluding nonre-
curring items, provisions for estimated loan and real estate losses, costs of
real estate operations on specific properties and gains/losses on the sale of
securities. This computation reflects a change from the method of computation
used in previous periods in that the impact of real estate operations on spe-
cific properties is now excluded from the computation. The lower the efficiency
ratio, the lower the amount of resources being expended by the Bank to generate
a given level of revenues. As a result, an increase in the efficiency ratio in-
dicates that the Bank is expending more resources to generate revenues and the
Bank is thus becoming less efficient in the use of its resources. A decrease in
the efficiency ratio indicates the opposite (i.e. an improvement). Changes in
the efficiency ratio are due to three factors: (a) changes in net interest in-
come, (b) changes in noninterest income, and (c) changes in operating expenses.
A decline in net interest income and/or noninterest income and/or a rise in op-
erating expenses will have an unfavorable impact on the ratio (i.e. will in-
crease the ratio), and the converse also holds true.
Fidelity's efficiency ratio worsened by 24.85 percentage points from 61.56% for
the quarter ended March 31, 1993 to 86.41% for the quarter ended March 31, 1994
due to unfavorable variances in all three components. Asset quality problems
adversely affected two of the components of the efficiency ratio: reduced net
interest income via an increase in nonperforming loans and mounting foreclosure
activities, which resulted in a decrease in interest-bearing assets and lower
asset yield; and higher operating expenses due to increased staffing levels in
the real estate asset and credit management groups, retail financial services
network and mortgage banking network and increased professional services de-
scribed above. Although these increases resulted in increased expense in the
short-term, they should provide a foundation for potentially improved perfor-
mance in the future. The Bank's efficiency ratio improved by 4.64 percentage
points from 91.05% for the quarter ended December 31, 1993 due to favorable
variances in all three components. An analysis of the change in the efficiency
ratios during the periods indicated is shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------
QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1994 MARCH 31, 1994
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
MARCH 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1993
-------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Variance due to:
Increased (decreased) net interest
income (8.13)% 0.79%
Increased (decreased) noninterest
income (0.90)% 3.27%
(Increased) decreased operating ex-
pense (15.82)% 0.58%
-------------- -----------------
Favorable (unfavorable) variance (24.85)% 4.64%
============== =================
</TABLE>
Continued deterioration in the asset quality of the Bank, and/or higher short-
term interest rates in the future to the extent there is a lag between
repricing liabilities and COFI indexed assets (if they occur) would have an ad-
verse effect on net interest income and noninterest income, which would in turn
lead to an increase (or worsening) in the efficiency ratio, assuming expenses
remain constant.
ASSET QUALITY
The Bank continues to be principally involved in the Southern California single
family and multifamily (2 units or more) residential lending businesses. At
March 31, 1994, 19.0% of Fidelity's real estate loan portfolio (including loans
held for sale) consisted of California single family residences while another
72.6% consisted of California multifamily dwellings. At March 31, 1993, 20.1%
of Fidelity's loan portfolio consisted of California single family residences
and 71.0% consisted of California multifamily dwellings. Current Southern Cali-
fornia economic conditions have adversely impacted the credit risk profile of
the Bank's loan portfolio.
51
<PAGE>
Fidelity's performance continues to be adversely affected by increased foreclo-
sure activities of the Bank reflecting the delicate nature of the Southern Cal-
ifornia economy and uncertain real estate market as noted in the table below.
Asset quality details of Fidelity are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1994 1993 1993
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
NPAS:
Nonaccruing loans $139,376 $ 93,475 $126,349
ISFs(1) - 28,362 29,639
REO 135,111 122,226 126,353
REO GVA (8,524) (8,442) (10,643)
--------- ------------ ---------
Total NPAs $265,963 $235,621 $271,698
========= ============ =========
Nonaccruing loans to total assets 3.38% 2.13% 2.65%
========= ============ =========
NPAs to total assets 6.46% 5.37% 5.72%
========= ============ =========
NPAS AND TDRS:
NPAs $265,963 $235,621 $271,698
Classified TDRs 20,236 23,650 38,528
Nonclassified TDRs 13,595 5,062 12,557
--------- ------------ ---------
Total NPAs and TDRs $299,794 $264,333 $322,783
========= ============ =========
TDRs to total assets 0.82% 0.65% 1.08%
========= ============ =========
NPAs and TDRs to total assets 7.28% 6.03% 6.80%
========= ============ =========
CRITICIZED ASSETS:
NPAs $265,963 $235,621 $271,698
Performing loans with increased risk 112,787 125,720 117,478
Real estate held for investment 11,770 11,161 10,803
--------- ------------ ---------
Total classified assets 390,520 372,502 399,979
Special mention assets 311,758 199,826 152,885
--------- ------------ ---------
Total criticized assets(1) $702,278 $572,328 $552,864
========= ============ =========
Classified assets to total assets 9.48% 8.49% 8.43%
========= ============ =========
Criticized assets to total assets 17.06% 13.05% 11.65%
========= ============ =========
NONPERFORMING ASSET RATIOS:
REO and ISF to NPAs(2) 47.60% 60.33% 53.50%
REO to NPAs(2) 47.60% 48.29% 42.59%
Nonaccruing loans to NPAs(2) 52.40% 39.67% 46.50%
ISF to NPAs(2) - 12.04% 10.91%
</TABLE>
(1) "Criticized assets" include all classified assets and all assets designated
by the Bank as "special mention."
(2) In the first quarter of 1994, the Bank implemented SFAS 114. Loans that
would have been considered ISF are included in the loan category beginning
in 1994.
Prior to 1994, loans were categorized as ISF based upon meeting all of the fol-
lowing three criteria: (a) the borrower had little or no equity at fair market
value in the underlying collateral, (b) the only source of repayment was the
property securing the loan, and (c) the borrower had abandoned the property or
would not have been able to rebuild equity in the foreseeable future.
On May 31, 1993, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 114,
"Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan." This Statement prescribes
the recognition criteria for loan impairment and the measurement methods for
certain impaired loans and loans whose terms are modified in TDRs. SFAS No. 114
defines a loan as impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable
to collect all principal and interest amounts due according to the contracted
terms
52
<PAGE>
of the loan agreement. This Statement also clarified the existing accounting
for ISFs by stating that a collateral dependent real estate loan would be re-
ported as REO only if the lender had taken possession of the collateral. Addi-
tionally, in June 1993, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, FDIC,
FRB and OTS issued a Joint Statement providing interagency guidance on the re-
porting of ISFs. This Joint Statement clarified that losses must be recognized
on real estate loans that meet the existing ISF criteria based on fair value of
the collateral, but such loans need not be reported as REO unless possession of
the underlying collateral has been obtained. The Bank adopted SFAS No. 114 in
the first quarter of 1994. Since the Bank already measured impairment based on
the fair market value of the properties securing these loans, the only effect
of the adoption of SFAS No. 114 was to increase loans by $28.4 million, which
was the total amount of ISFs at year-end 1993, and to reduce REO by the same
amount.
During the first quarter of 1994, nonaccruing loans increased to $139.4 million
from $121.8 million at year-end 1993 and $156.0 million at March 31, 1993 after
adjusting for effects of a change in classification of ISF loans from REO to
loans in response to adoption of SFAS No. 114 at the beginning of 1994. The in-
crease of $17.6 million in nonaccruing loans is primarily due to an increase in
loans delinquent 90 days and over resulting from the continuing weakness of the
Southern California economy which has led to lower rental rates and increased
vacancies in apartment units and declining real estate prices. The Bank gener-
ally places a loan on nonaccrual status whenever the payment of interest is 90
days or more past due, or earlier if a loan exhibits materially deficient char-
acteristics.
REO (excluding ISF) increased to $135.1 million at March 31, 1994, from $122.2
million at December 31, 1993, and $126.4 million at March 31, 1993. The in-
crease in REO stems primarily from a decline in pace of disposition of REO
properties due to the proposed securitized debt financing for those troubled
real estate assets targeted for bulk transfer that was a part of the former re-
structuring plan.
The following schedule presents loans for which the Bank has established spe-
cific allowances for credit losses ("specific valuation allowances", "specific
reserves" or "specific loss reserves") to recognize impairment in connection
with SFAS No. 114 as of March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ALLOWANCE % OF
LOAN FOR ALLOWANCE TO
AMOUNT CREDIT LOSSES LOAN AMOUNT
------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Property type:
Single family $ 2,547 $ 241 9.46%
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 1,051 203 19.31%
5 to 19 units 13,618 4,405 32.35%
20 to 36 units 14,222 3,744 26.33%
37 units and over 18,540 4,944 26.67%
------- -------------
Total multifamily 47,431 13,296 28.03%
------- -------------
Commercial and industrial 4,051 1,282 31.65%
------- -------------
$54,029 $14,819 27.43%
======= =============
</TABLE>
The Bank has modified the terms of certain loans that resulted in those loans
being defined as TDRs according to SFAS No. 15, "Accounting by Debtors and
Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings". TDRs represent loans that are cur-
rent as to payment of principal and interest, but have had their terms renego-
tiated to a more favorable position for the borrower due to an inability to
meet the original terms of the note. TDRs decreased by $17.3 million between
March 31, 1993 and March 31, 1994 as a number of borrowers were either able to
return to the original payment terms at the expiration of the modification pe-
riod or the loan migrated to nonperforming loans or REO.
Classified assets consist of NPAs, and all other assets classified for internal
and regulatory purposes, plus other assets that are currently performing, but
exhibit deficiencies that indicate the distinct possibility that the Bank will
sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected, identified as "per-
forming loans with increased risk". Classified assets are assigned to
53
<PAGE>
one of the following three categories in the order of increasing credit risk:
(a) Substandard - an asset with well-defined weaknesses characterized by in a
distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are
not corrected, (b) Doubtful - an asset which has all the weaknesses of a Sub-
standard asset with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collec-
tion or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, condi-
tions and values, highly questionable and improbable, and (c) Loss - an asset,
or portion thereof, considered uncollectible and of such little value that a
loss classification is warranted; the amount identified as loss can be charged
off or a specific reserve established for the amount considered uncollectible.
Classified assets increased by $18.0 million from December 31, 1993, to March
31, 1994, primarily because of an increase in nonperforming assets. "Criti-
cized assets" include all classified assets and all assets designated by the
Bank as "special mention."
In addition to classifying assets, the Bank also designates certain assets as
Special Mention which are considered criticized assets but not classified as
they do not currently expose the Bank to a sufficient degree of risk to war-
rant an adverse classification. However, they do possess credit deficiencies
or potential weaknesses deserving management's close attention. If
uncorrected, such weaknesses or deficiencies may expose an institution to an
increased risk of loss in the future.
Special Mention assets consist of loans on 1 to 4 unit properties which are 60
to 89 days delinquent and on other multifamily properties (5 units and over)
which are 30 to 89 days delinquent, assets in bankruptcy less than 60 days de-
linquent, and all other assets otherwise criticized for internal or regulatory
purposes.
54
<PAGE>
After adjusting for the effect of the earthquake of January 1994 and the subse-
quent aftershocks as described in Note 1 below, the following table presents
delinquencies of the respective loan portfolios as of the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1994(1) 1993 1993
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Delinquencies by number of days:
30 to 59 days 0.93% 0.92% 0.57%
60 to 89 days 1.05% 0.64% 0.71%
90 days and over 3.64% 2.15% 2.77%
--------- ------------ ---------
Loan delinquencies to net loan portfolio 5.62% 3.71% 4.05%
========= ============ =========
Delinquencies by property type:
Single family:
30 to 59 days $ 8,048 $ 7,480 $ 1,880
60 to 89 days 6,355 2,497 2,947
90 days and over 16,698 12,661 15,996
--------- ------------ ---------
31,101 22,638 20,823
--------- ------------ ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 4.49% 2.85% 2.52%
Multifamily (2 to 4 units):
30 to 59 days 3,158 3,599 3,427
60 to 89 days 3,413 1,707 3,719
90 days and over 18,766 15,652 10,650
--------- ------------ ---------
25,337 20,958 17,796
--------- ------------ ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 5.78% 4.16% 3.40%
Multifamily (5 to 36 units):
30 to 59 days 6,522 16,948 14,170
60 to 89 days 15,875 12,770 10,682
90 days and over 54,243 34,746 53,228
--------- ------------ ---------
76,640 64,464 78,080
--------- ------------ ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 4.30% 3.60% 4.15%
Multifamily (37 units and over):
30 to 59 days 6,535 4,114 1,620
60 to 89 days 7,341 5,035 9,807
90 days and over 35,346 4,358 21,812
--------- ------------ ---------
49,222 13,507 33,239
--------- ------------ ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 12.00% 3.35% 7.57%
Commercial & Industrial:
30 to 59 days 8,276 2,048 1,249
60 to 89 days 4,321 1,723 458
90 days and over 4,358 12,443 6,938
--------- ------------ ---------
16,955 16,214 8,645
--------- ------------ ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 5.61% 5.45% 2.58%
Total loan delinquencies, net $199,255 $137,781 $158,583
========= ============ =========
</TABLE>
(1) For purposes of determining the effect of the Northridge earthquake on to-
tal delinquencies, only the new 30 to 59 day delinquent loans, where the
borrowers indicated their delinquency status was due to the earthquake, to-
taling $174.2 million, were reduced from total contractual delinquencies of
$373.5 million at March 31, 1994. However, management believes that there
are additional loans in the 60 days and over delinquent categories, which
have continued to be delinquent due to the earthquake.
55
<PAGE>
The following table presents the Bank's new 30 to 59 day delinquent loans at
March 31, 1994, that management believes to be the result of the effects of the
earthquake based upon advice received from the borrowers:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------
MARCH 31, 1994
% OF
AMOUNT PORTFOLIO
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Property type:
Single Family $ 15,177 2.19%
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 1,796 0.41%
5 to 36 units 108,225 6.06%
37 units and over 41,751 10.19%
Commercial and other 7,249 2.40%
---------
$174,198 4.90%
=========
</TABLE>
The earthquake caused the 30 to 59 day delinquent category to increase dramati-
cally as borrowers were trying to deal with short-term cash flow needs result-
ing from this disaster. The OTS encouraged the development of such programs,
which were designed to provide relief to affected borrowers by deferring pay-
ments, capitalizing interest payments or making additional advances to borrow-
ers to repair severely damaged properties, while remaining consistent with the
Bank's safe and sound business practices. With respect to each request for
earthquake relief, the Bank inspected the subject property to verify that the
property sustained earthquake damage, evaluated the credit history of the bor-
rower and considered a number of additional factors in order to develop an ac-
commodation program suitable to the particular borrower and affected property.
The Bank has identified 494 earthquake-affected loans warranting accommodation
negotiations with a total net book value of $253.2 million as of May 31, 1994.
These loans are allocated into two pools. The first pool includes 438 loans
with a total net book value of approximately $226.7 million. As of May 31,
1994, loans in this first pool fell into three categories with respect to sta-
tus:
. 245 loans with a total net book value of approximately $103.9 million
which have signed accommodation agreements;
. 122 loans with a total net book value of approximately $74.2 million for
which accommodations have been approved and documented by the Bank, but
which documents have not yet been executed and returned to the Bank by
the borrowers; and
. 71 loans with a total net book value of approximately $48.6 million as
to which negotiations are underway and are expected to be completed in
the near future.
Of the loans in this first pool, $49.5 million involve accommodations that pro-
vide for a deferral or reduction of six or more monthly payments, which loans
currently will be categorized as TDRs solely due to the length of the accommo-
dation period. Earthquake accommodations in this pool require or will require
the borrowers to make scheduled payments in accordance with their respective
accommodation terms by July 1, 1994; if such loans are delinquent for 30 days
or more on August 1, 1994, certain adjustments will be made for the impact of
that failure on the potential value of these loans as described under "Restruc-
turing and Recapitalization - Recapitalization - Closing Adjustments."
The second pool, the Earthquake TDR Pool, consists of 56 loans with a total net
book value of approximately $26.5 million. Management believes that loans in
this pool may require TDR treatment and possibly specific reserves. Of the min-
imum Target GVA of $58 million, up to $8 million has been allocated for this
pool of 56 earthquake-affected loans.
Of the 494 earthquake-affected loans, 20 loans with a net book value of approx-
imately $36.9 million are included in the Bulk Sales.
While the rest of the nation is experiencing a modest economic recovery, the
Southern California economy remains sluggish with higher unemployment than
elsewhere in the country and real estate values that continue to deteriorate.
There can be
56
<PAGE>
no assurances that these economic conditions will improve in the near future.
Consequently, rents and real estate values may continue to decline, which may
affect future delinquency and foreclosure levels and may adversely impact the
Bank's asset quality, earnings performance and capital.
In response to the deterioration of the Bank's portfolio and increased delin-
quencies, the Bank recorded additions to its allowances for estimated loan
losses and real estate losses totaling $19.9 million for the three months ended
March 31, 1994. In the opinion of the Bank, this deterioration has been caused
by: (a) the decline in apartment occupancy levels and of rents available to
apartment owners in Southern California; (b) downward revisions in projections
as to inflation and rental income growth; (c) the increased returns currently
being required by purchasers of multifamily-income producing properties; (d)
announced cutbacks in public sector spending; (e) the general illiquidity in
the Southern California market for multifamily income producing properties; (f)
the continuing high level of unemployment in and migration of skilled and white
collar labor from Southern California; and (g) the Northridge earthquake of
January 17, 1994 and the subsequent aftershocks. The Bank's combined GVA for
loan and real estate losses at March 31, 1994, was $85.1 million or 2.26% of
total loans and real estate, up from $80.0 million or 2.03% at December 31,
1993 and $75.0 million or 1.81% at March 31, 1993.
The following table summarizes Fidelity's reserves, writedowns and certain cov-
erage ratios at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1994 1993 1993
--------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
LOANS:
GVA $ 76,549 $ 71,578 $ 63,134
Specific reserves 14,819 12,254 5,322
--------- ------------ ---------
Total allowance for estimated losses $ 91,368 $ 83,832 $ 68,456
========= ============ =========
Writedowns(1) $ 31,238 $ 4,251 $ 4,272
========= ============ =========
Total allowance and loan writedowns to
gross loans 3.33% 2.32% 1.81%
Loan GVA to loans and ISF(2) 2.11% 1.88% 1.58%
Loan GVA to nonaccruing loans and ISF(2) 54.92% 58.75% 40.47%
Nonperforming loans to total loans(2) 3.93% 2.52% 3.23%
REAL ESTATE OWNED:
REO GVA $ 8,524 $ 8,442 $ 11,843
Specific reserves 11,941 9,273 2,982
--------- ------------ ---------
Total allowance for estimated losses $ 20,465 $ 17,715 $ 14,825
========= ============ =========
Writedowns(1) $ 66,117 $ 90,901 $ 80,746
========= ============ =========
Total REO allowance and REO writedowns to
gross REO 37.59% 37.41% 27.40%
REO GVA to REO 6.31% 6.91% 8.42%
TOTAL LOANS AND REO:
GVA $ 85,073 $ 80,020 $ 74,977
Specific reserves 26,760 21,527 8,304
--------- ------------ ---------
Total allowance for estimated losses $111,833 $101,547 $ 83,281
========= ============ =========
Writedowns(1) $ 97,355 $ 95,152 $ 85,018
========= ============ =========
Total allowance and writedowns to gross
loans, REO and ISF(2)(3) 5.38% 4.87% 3.97%
Total GVA to loans, REO and ISF(2)(3) 2.26% 2.03% 1.81%
</TABLE>
(1) Writedowns include cumulative charge-offs taken on outstanding loans and
REO as of the date indicated.
(2) In the first quarter of 1994, the Bank implemented SFAS 114. Loans that
would have been considered ISF are included in the loan category beginning
in 1994.
(3) Loans, REO and NPAs in these ratios are calculated prior to the reduction
for loan and REO GVA, but are net of specific reserves.
57
<PAGE>
As of March 31, 1994, Fidelity's 15 largest borrowers accounted for $246.2 mil-
lion of gross loans, or 6.76% of total loans. A number of these borrowing rela-
tionships also include Fidelity's largest loans. Details of these relationships
follow:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) NUMBER TOTAL AMOUNT OF LARGEST
BORROWER OF LOANS LOANS SINGLE LOAN(1)
-------- --------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1 2 $ 32,593 $32,555
2 30 28,907(1) 9,881
3 9 26,748(1) 11,122
4 3 23,739 14,977
5 3 20,436(1) 13,662
6 54 15,443 6,553
7 1 13,881 13,881
8 3 13,748 13,620
9 2 11,294 5,815
10 3 11,038 6,815
11 1 10,217 10,217
12 9 10,180(1) 3,466
13 1 10,018 10,018
14 1 9,238 9,238
15 3 8,716(1) 7,508
---------------
$246,196
===============
</TABLE>
(1) Amounts are shown net of participations.
Fidelity's 10 largest loans include those loans shown in the table above with
balances of $9.2 million or greater. Fidelity's 10 largest loans aggregated
$139.2 million at March 31, 1994, of which $67.2 million (4 loans) was classi-
fied as substandard and $10.2 million (1 loan) was listed as special mention.
As of December 31, 1993, the largest borrower's loans were considered ISF by
the Bank. This borrower's two loans totaling approximately $32.6 million are
comprised of a term note for $32.55 million and an operating note for a revolv-
ing line of credit with an outstanding balance of $.04 million. The term note
provides that the total principal and interest payments due may not exceed $64
million. Pursuant to the provisions of the term note, the borrower makes pay-
ments only to the extent that the hotel operations have net operating income.
As of March 31, 1994, the accrued interest totaled$31.4 million, the total
principal and interest due has therefore reached the maximum amount. The prin-
cipal amount of the operating note may not exceed $1.0 million. The Bank re-
ceived payments of approximately $230,000 and zero for the periods ended Decem-
ber 31, 1993 and March 31, 1994, respectively, on the operating note. Securing
the loans is a 144 unit condominium complex located in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii.
However, the property is currently being operated as a hotel. Both notes have
an interest rate of 12% and are due in 1999.
At March 31, 1994, Fidelity had $28.9 million in total loans outstanding to its
second largest borrower, consisting of 30 loans secured by multifamily apart-
ment dwellings located in the San Gabriel Valley and eastern Los Angeles areas.
Of the total, loans representing $26.1 million (25 loans) were classified as
substandard. During the first quarter, the Bank modified 19 of such loans to-
taling $4.5 million to allow the borrower to make interest payments only. The
borrower also has the option to reduce principal by 10% to 15% with Fidelity
matching the reduction through debt forgiveness. Also, in the first quarter,
the Bank foreclosed on 5 properties owned by the borrower securing loans of
$3.9 million. The Bank is continuing its efforts to modify the remaining loans.
During 1992, Fidelity's third largest borrower (as of March 31, 1994) was in
default on eight of that borrower's nine loans. Six of the eight defaulted
loans were restructured in 1992 allowing the borrower to make interest only
payments through the end of 1992. The remaining two loans in default were modi-
fied in February 1993 to include interest only payments through June 1993.
These two loans were classified as Substandard and identified as TDRs. As of
December 31, 1993, seven of the loans totaling $24.6 million were 29 days de-
linquent and one totaling $2.1 million was 59 days delinquent. At December 31,
1993, five loans totaling $17.2 million were classified as Substandard. In May
1994, Fidelity entered
58
<PAGE>
into modification agreements with this borrower on five of these loans. Pursu-
ant to these modifications, the borrower will make interest only payments
through December 31, 1994, two months of interest payments will be capitalized
and the borrower paid a total of $295,113 against real property taxes advanced
by Fidelity on the properties securing these loans. Fidelity is currently in
negotiations to modify two additional loans with this borrower requiring the
consent of an 80% participant.
During the three months ended March 31, 1994, the Bank charged off a total of
$11.3 million on loans and real estate, compared to $24.2 million and $6.3
million for the three months ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993. In-
cluded in the $11.3 million was $10.1 million on multifamily properties. Dur-
ing the same three periods, the Bank recovered $1.7 million, $1.4 million and
$0.4 million, respectively, of previous writedowns.
The ongoing uncertainty in the Southern California economy, the weak real es-
tate market and the level of the Bank's nonperforming assets continue to be
significant concerns to Fidelity. All of these factors may require additional
loss provisions, as the Bank performs its quarterly reviews of the adequacy of
its allowance for estimated losses on loans and real estate. See "1993 Com-
pared with 1992 and 1992 Compared with 1991 - Asset Quality - Adequacy of
GVA."
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Prevailing economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates,
as well as governmental policies and regulations concerning, among other
things, monetary and fiscal affairs, significantly affect interest rates and a
savings institution's net interest income. Fidelity actively manages its as-
sets and liabilities in an effort to mitigate its exposure to interest rate
risk, but it cannot eliminate this exposure entirely without unduly affecting
its profitability. As is the case with many thrift institutions, Fidelity's
deposits historically have matured or repriced more rapidly than its loans and
other investments, and consequently, increases in market interest rates have
tended to reduce Fidelity's net interest income, while decreases in market in-
terest rates have tended to increase its net interest income.
Fidelity's interest rate risk ("IRR") management plan is aimed at maximizing
net interest income while controlling interest rate risk exposure in terms of
the market value of portfolio equity, consistent with the objectives and lim-
its set by the Board of Directors and applicable regulations. Financial insti-
tutions, by their funds intermediation function, gather deposits which have a
different duration than the loans that they originate, i.e., interest rate
risk exposure is an inherent characteristic of the banking business. The IRR
management plan is designed to maintain interest rate exposure within target
limits. Elimination of interest rate risk is usually not cost effective; while
excess exposure could result in additional capital requirements.
There are two ways by which Fidelity maintains its exposure profile within
satisfactory limits: first, by actively changing the composition of its bal-
ance sheet; second, by the use of financial instruments, often in the form of
off-balance sheet derivative products. The extent to which Fidelity elects to
use either or both of these methods will depend on the observed preferences of
its customers, time horizon of its objectives (short-term versus long-term ob-
jectives), conditions in the financial markets (especially volatility of in-
terest rates and steepness of the yield curves), its operating characteristics
and the associated cost/benefit tradeoffs.
The balance sheet strategies consist of reducing basis risk by adding market
index loans to the asset portfolio and decreasing liability sensitivity by en-
couraging growth of its transactions account base. The Bank provides products
to meet its customers' needs. The Bank uses derivative products to the extent
changes in its portfolio cannot be achieved while meeting customer needs.
Fidelity continues to reduce its IRR exposure by originating ARM loans for its
portfolio. Since 1985, the Bank has consistently moved toward building a port-
folio consisting predominantly of interest rate sensitive loans. ARM loans
comprised 96.8% of the portfolio of total loans at March 31, 1994, compared to
96.1% at March 31, 1993. The percentage of monthly adjustable ARMs to total
loans was 76.1% at March 31, 1994, compared to 77.6% at March 31, 1993. Inter-
est sensitive assets provide the Bank with long-term protection from rising
interest rates.
The Bank is also emphasizing the growth of its transaction account base to re-
duce its overall cost of funds. Transaction accounts include checking, pass-
book and money market accounts. The ratio of retail transaction accounts,
money market savings and passbook accounts to total deposits increased to 24%
at March 31, 1994 from 22% at December 31, 1993 but decreased from 25% at
March 31, 1993.
59
<PAGE>
In 1993, the Bank sold options to enter into swap contracts with a notional
principal amount of $200 million. These options gave the buyers the right to
cancel the swap agreements at specified dates and, if not canceled, provided
the Bank with additional synthetic hedges. See "1993 Compared with 1992 and
1992 Compared with 1991 - Interest Rate Risk Management." The option holders
did not exercise their right and thus, the Bank was able to add an additional
$200 million of synthetic hedges to its portfolio. Once the swap options were
converted into a formal swap contract, they were no longer considered a trading
position. The market value adjustments at the time of conversion were recog-
nized and will be amortized over the life of the contracts.
At March 31, 1994, the Bank had a total notional principal amount of $450 mil-
lion of interest rate swap contracts with a current average receive rate of
4.77% and a current average pay rate of 3.75%. In an effort to fully cover the
average maturity of the deposits hedged and to protect against an adverse move
in the value of these deposits, the Bank negotiated to extend the maturities of
three $50 million swaps by 6 to 8 months. This action increased the fixed rate
received by Fidelity, while at the same time locking in recent market value
gains on the related deposits. The following table summarizes the Bank's inter-
est rate swaps as of March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------
INCOME EXPENSE
NOTIONAL FIXED FLOATING
(Dollars in thousands) AMOUNT RATE RATE
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SPECIFIC HEDGE:
Federal funds sold $ 50,000 4.84% 3.25%
Loan receivable 50,000 4.82% 3.64%
Deposits 170,000 4.78% 3.88%
FHLB Advances 180,000 4.74% 3.81%
---------
Total $450,000 4.77% 3.75%
=========
</TABLE>
The Bank also purchased two interest rate floor contracts with a total notional
principal amount of $100 million which will protect against interest rate de-
clines below the fixed rate floor of 4.75%. The contracts provide for the Bank
to receive the interest rate differential on the notional amount between the
three-month LIBOR rate and the contract floor. The effective dates for the con-
tracts extend from March 1995 through April 1997.
Fidelity's maturity and repricing mismatch ("Gap") between interest rate sensi-
tive assets and liabilities due within one year was a negative 7.27% at March
31, 1994, a negative 3.43% at December 31, 1993 and a positive 8.93% of total
assets at March 31, 1993. A positive Gap indicates an excess of maturing or
repricing assets over liabilities, whereas a negative Gap indicates an excess
of maturing or repricing liabilities over assets. However, Gap is not particu-
larly helpful as a measure of IRR exposure, because of four major deficiencies:
(a) Gap assumes that both assets and liabilities react immediately to market
changes, although loans usually reprice to an index that is at least two months
old and therefore cannot immediately react to current rates; (b) Gap further
assumes that all instruments react fully to market rates, whereas loans tied to
COFI or other lagging indices can take many months to fully adjust to market
rate changes; (c) Gap assumes that there will be no change in repricing behav-
ior caused by a change in interest rates and, in reality, prepayment speed, am-
ortization schedules and early withdrawal are all impacted by changes in rate;
and (d) finally, Gap does not consider periodic rate caps and floors. Conse-
quently, the Bank does not use Gap as an IRR measurement and management tool.
Fidelity uses a scenario-based approach which measures bank-wide risk and a
probabilistic approach for specific products. The Bank regularly analyzes sce-
narios that contemplate low, expected and high inflation. The Bank also
complies with OTS requirements for interest rate shock scenarios (immediate
permanent change in interest rates of various levels). For product and option
valuation and for analyzing the results of off-balance sheet instruments, the
Bank employs a Monte Carlo simulation model (one that assumes random variation
in interest rates) to measure and evaluate risk and return trade-offs.
The Company's IRR management plan is reviewed on a continuing basis. At March
31, 1994, the Bank's interest rate risk was less than half of the exposure the
OTS considers to be above normal. See "Business - Regulation and Supervision -
FIRREA Capital Requirements." Even at this lower risk level, due to the lag
effect that COFI has on Fidelity's loan portfolio, the decline in short-term
rates from 1990 to early 1993 contributed significantly to the Bank's net in-
terest margin. Stable rates thereafter through February 1994 have eroded this
margin, and more recent increases in rates could produce an initial reduction
in net interest income. Management intends to continue to manage IRR exposure
through products tied to indices that reprice without a timing lag and by using
hedging techniques.
60
<PAGE>
1993 COMPARED WITH 1992 AND 1992 COMPARED WITH 1991
NET EARNINGS
Fidelity had a net loss of $65.9 million in 1993 compared to net earnings of
$.03 million in 1992 and $8.1 million in 1991.
The following table summarizes these results:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991
---------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes $(101,680) $(1,880) $22,400
Net earnings (loss) $ (65,887) $ 287 $ 8,104
Return on average equity (32.74)% 0.13% 3.64%
Return on average assets (1.44)% 0.01% 0.15%
</TABLE>
The components of the changes in earnings/loss before income taxes are shown
below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE) VARIANCE
1993 1992
VS. VS.
1992 1991
---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest income $ (29,754) $ (10,947)
Provision for loan losses (13,920) (1,337)
---------------- ----------------
Net interest income after loan loss
provision (43,674) (12,284)
---------------- ----------------
Fee income and other income (6,237) 9,892
Provision for real estate losses (12,380) (10,283)
Direct costs of real estate opera-
tions, net (14,202) (2,381)
Gain (loss) on sales of loans (923) (1,001)
Gains on sales of securities 1,304 (8,994)
---------------- ----------------
Noninterest income (32,438) (12,767)
Operating expense (23,688) 771
---------------- ----------------
Earnings/loss before income taxes (99,800) (24,280)
Income tax expense/benefit 33,626 16,463
---------------- ----------------
Net earnings/loss $ (66,174) $ (7,817)
================ ================
</TABLE>
The $99.8 million change in earnings/loss before income taxes between 1993 and
1992 was primarily due to (a) decreased net interest income of $29.8 million,
(b) increased operating expense of $23.7 million, (c) a $26.3 million increase
in the provision for loan and real estate losses, (d) a $14.2 million increase
in direct costs related to real estate operations, and (e) decreased fee income
and other income of $6.2 million. This was partially offset by a $1.3 million
increase in gains on sales of securities. The $23.7 million increase in operat-
ing expenses from 1992 to 1993 was attributable in part to increased staffing
levels required to manage rising problem assets, strengthen internal asset re-
view, support increased financial services offered at the retail branch network
and expand originations and sales of residential mortgages in the mortgage
banking network. The increase was also attributable to certain nonrecurring
charges incurred in connection with the Bank's valuation of its intangible as-
sets and further development of the internal reorganization and restructuring
plans. Such charges included the write-off of $8.8 million of goodwill and $5.2
million in core deposit intangibles and an increase of $5.8 million in profes-
sional fees, of which approximately $3.1 million was attributable to analysis
and development of the Bank's restructuring plan and the related asset valua-
tion process.
61
<PAGE>
In 1993, Fidelity reassessed the valuation of its intangible assets. Based upon
the results of a branch profitability analysis and an analysis of the
recoverability of its CDI assets, Fidelity wrote down the carrying value of its
CDI assets in the amount of $5.2 million (which writedown is included in inter-
est expense). In addition, an analysis was performed of the recoverability of
the goodwill related to the acquisition of Mariners in 1978. These analyses in-
dicated that the net expected future earnings from the branches or assets ac-
quired did not support the carrying value of the goodwill. As a result, Fidel-
ity wrote down the remaining $8.8 million balance of goodwill related to the
Mariners acquisition (which writedown is included in operating expense).
The $24.3 million change in earnings/loss before income taxes between 1992 and
1991 was mainly due to (a) an $10.9 million decrease in net interest income,
(b) an increase in the provision for loan and real estate operations of $11.6
million, (c) a $9.0 million decrease in gains on sales of securities, and (d) a
$2.4 million increase in direct costs related to real estate operations. These
were partially offset by increased fee income and other income of $9.9 million
and decreased operating expenses of $0.8 million.
The following table summarizes certain regulatory capital and asset quality in-
formation for Fidelity as of the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Core Capital(1) $182,100 $203,400 $205,300
Core Capital Ratio(1) 4.15% 4.35% 4.02%
NPAs to Total Assets 5.37% 4.99% 2.43%
Nonaccruing Loans to NPAs 39.67% 47.80% 55.31%
REO (including ISF) to NPAs 60.33% 52.20% 44.69%
GVA $ 80,020 $ 75,621 $ 52,374
GVA to Loans, REO and ISF 2.03% 1.82% 1.13%
GVA to NPAs 32.79% 30.49% 41.99%
</TABLE>
(1) 1993 capital includes capital contributions from Citadel of $28.0 million.
See "Asset Quality" for more information.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income for 1993 of $100.8 million decreased by $29.8 million or
22.8% from $130.6 million for 1992. This decrease resulted from the combined
impacts of (a) a 6.7% decrease in average interest-earning assets, reducing net
interest income by $14.8 million, and (b) a 49 basis point decrease in the ef-
fective yield on interest-earning assets, decreasing net interest income by
$15.0 million, caused in part by the $5.2 million writedown of CDIs in 1993.
The remaining net unamortized balance of core deposit intangibles at December
31, 1993 was $2.1 million which is being amortized over the average remaining
life of the deposits acquired, generally 1 to 3 years.
Net interest income for 1992 of $130.6 million decreased by $10.9 million or
7.7% from $141.5 million for 1991. This $10.9 million decrease resulted from
the offsetting impacts of (a) a 12.0% decrease in average interest-earning as-
sets, reducing net interest income by $12.5 million, and (b) a 13 basis point
increase in the effective yield on interest-earning assets, increasing net in-
terest income by $1.6 million. See "Business - Interest Rate Risk Management"
for certain additional information regarding the Bank's interest income.
The reduction in income related to nonaccruing loans was approximately $8.7
million in 1993 compared to $13.6 million in 1992 and $7.6 million in 1991.
62
<PAGE>
The following table displays the components of the Company's interest rate mar-
gin at the end of, and for each period, as well as the effective yield for each
period:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------
AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rate at the end of the period:
Weighted average yield on combined loans and
investments 6.38% 7.22% 9.41%
Weighted average cost of funds 4.14% 4.53% 6.21%
-------- -------- --------
Interest rate margin at the end of the period 2.24%(1) 2.69% 3.20%
======== ======== ========
Rate for the period:
Weighted average yield on combined loans and
investments 6.64% 7.94% 9.80%
Weighted average cost of funds 4.38% 5.28% 7.27%
-------- -------- --------
Interest rate margin for the period 2.26%(1) 2.66% 2.53%
======== ======== ========
Effective yield for the period 2.31%(1) 2.80% 2.67%
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
(1) Excluding the writedown of core deposit intangibles of $5.2 million, the
interest rate margins at and for the year ended December 31, 1993 and the
effective yield on interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31,
1993, would have been 2.37%, 2.38% and 2.43%, respectively.
The reduction in the interest rate margin in 1993 from 1992 can be attributed
to the lagging relationship between the repricing of assets and liabilities as
market interest rates stabilize. The interest rate margin of the Bank increases
in a period of steady decline in interest rates, since the yield on interest-
bearing assets drops more slowly than the rates paid on interest-bearing lia-
bilities. Conversely, as market interest rates stabilize and then increase, the
interest rate margin of the Bank will shrink, other conditions being equal.
This factor, together with the timing of asset repricing and the increase in
nonperforming assets, resulted in a reduction of 132 basis points in the yield
on loans in 1993 from 1992 average levels, while the decrease in market inter-
est rates resulted in a reduction in the cost of funds of only 90 basis points
for the comparable period.
The increase in the Bank's interest margin for 1992 compared to 1991 was pri-
marily caused by the continued downward trend in market interest rates during
1992 which resulted in a decrease in the cost of funds of 199 basis points. The
effect of the reduced cost of funds on the interest margin was partially offset
by a decrease of 179 basis points in the yield on loans from 1991 due to de-
clines in the COFI.
Since 1990, Fidelity has continued its strategy to more closely match the
repricing periods of its interest-bearing liability and interest-earning asset
portfolios by concentrating on the origination and retention of ARM loans. In
1993, 1992 and 1991, the Bank retained substantially all of the ARM loans it
originated. The percentage of monthly adjustable ARMs outstanding to the total
ARM portfolio was 78%, 77% and 74% at December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respec-
tively, while the percentage of semiannual adjustable ARMs was 19% at December
31, 1993 compared to 21% in 1992 and 24% in 1991. This trend of increasing the
monthly adjustable ARM portfolio in relation to the decreasing semiannual ad-
justable ARM portfolio will reduce, but not eliminate, the risk created by the
mismatch of the assets' repricing index and the liabilities' repricing indices.
However, certain ARMs meeting specific criteria have been identified as held
for sale and transferred to the held for sale portfolio as part of the
asset/liability strategy and the possible need to increase regulatory capital
in the future. See "Interest Rate Risk Management" for further discussion.
63
<PAGE>
NONINTEREST INCOME
The following table details the noninterest income/expense:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
FAVORABLE
(UNFAVORABLE)
1993 1992 VARIANCE
--------- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Loan and other fee income $ 5,389 $ 7,885 $ (2,496)
Gain (loss) on sales of loans, net 194 1,117 (923)
Fee income from investment products - 2,606 (2,606)
Fee income from deposits and other in-
come 3,271 4,406 (1,135)
--------- --------- -------------
8,854 16,014 (7,160)
--------- --------- -------------
Provision for estimated real estate
losses (30,200) (17,820) (12,380)
Direct costs of real estate opera-
tions, net (18,643) (4,441) (14,202)
--------- --------- -------------
(48,843) (22,261) (26,582)
--------- --------- -------------
Gains on sales of mortgage-backed se-
curities, net 1,342 - 1,342
Gains (loss) on sales of investment
securities, net (38) - (38)
--------- --------- -------------
1,304 - 1,304
--------- --------- -------------
$(38,685) $ (6,247) $(32,438)
========= ========= =============
</TABLE>
Noninterest income from ongoing operations decreased by $7.2 million, to $8.8
million during 1993 from $16.0 million during 1992 partly due to the Bank's re-
tooling and refocusing efforts during 1993 (see "Operating Expense"). Since Fi-
delity paid a dividend in kind to Citadel consisting of its equity ownership of
Gateway during the fourth quarter of 1992, there was no fee income from invest-
ment products reported by Fidelity in 1993.
Foreclosure activities increased markedly from December 31, 1992 to December
31, 1993, resulting in an increase in REO both in terms of numbers of proper-
ties and total dollars. REO consists of real estate acquired in settlement of
loans and, prior to 1994, ISFs.
The following table summarizes certain components of Fidelity's real estate op-
erations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------
1993 1992
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
1992 1991
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Increase in:
Provision for estimated real estate losses $12,380 $10,283
Direct costs of real estate operations, net 14,202 2,381
----------- -----------
$26,582 $12,664
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
64
<PAGE>
The following table provides details on the net book value and number of prop-
erties owned at given dates:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Owned real estate, net book value:
December 31, 1993 $153,307
December 31, 1992 133,255 $133,255
December 31, 1991 70,259
-------- --------
Increase $ 20,052 $ 62,996
======== ========
Number of real estate properties owned:
December 31, 1993 240
December 31, 1992 170 170
December 31, 1991 63
-------- --------
Increase 70 107
======== ========
</TABLE>
Provisions for real estate losses increased by $12.4 million in the year ended
December 31, 1993 as compared to the same period in 1992, and provisions for
loan losses increased by $13.9 million over the same period. See "Asset Quali-
ty" for further detail.
Noninterest income decreased by $12.8 million in 1992 compared to 1991. This
decrease was due to the combined effects of (a) an increase in net expense from
real estate operations of $12.7 million, inclusive of provisions for estimated
real estate losses, (b) a decrease in gains on sales of mortgage-backed securi-
ties of $9.0 million as there were no such sales in 1992, and (c) a decrease in
other expense of $7.4 million due to the accrual for contingent liabilities of
$6.0 million in 1991 with a $1.0 million reduction in such accrual in 1992.
OPERATING EXPENSE
Operating expense increased to $98.7 million in 1993 from $75.0 million in 1992
and $75.8 million in 1991. The following table details the operating expenses
for 1993 and 1992:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------
YEAR ENDED FAVORABLE
DECEMBER 31, (UNFAVORABLE)
1993 1992 VARIANCE
-------- ------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Personnel and benefits $ 46,215 $38,926 $ (7,289)
Occupancy 13,086 12,678 (408)
FDIC insurance 8,628 8,391 (237)
Professional services 11,351 5,598 (5,753)
Office-related expenses 6,449 4,914 (1,535)
Marketing expense 2,753 2,548 (205)
Amortization of intangibles 9,246 596 (8,650)
Other general and administrative 3,046 4,168 1,122
-------- ------- --------
Total before capitalized costs 100,774 77,819 (22,955)
Capitalized costs (2,042) (2,775) (733)
-------- ------- --------
Total operating expenses $ 98,732 $75,044 $(23,688)
======== ======= ========
Efficiency ratio(1) 75.12% 45.38%
======== =======
Ratio of operating expense to average as-
sets(2) 2.16% 1.52%
======== =======
</TABLE>
(1) The efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense by net
interest income and noninterest income, excluding nonrecurring items, pro-
visions for estimated loan and real estate losses, direct costs of real es-
tate operations and gains/losses on the sale of securities.
(2) The operating expense ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense
by average total assets.
65
<PAGE>
A substantial portion of the increase from 1992 to 1993, as detailed below, was
due to the re-engineering of certain functions of the Bank, including related
training and personnel costs.
The increases in personnel and benefits were mainly due to increased staffing
levels during 1993 (with average FTEs of 860) over 1992 (with average FTEs of
806). The increased staffing levels were due to (a) increased staffing required
to manage the rising problem asset portfolio and to strengthen the internal as-
set review function, (b) increased staffing levels in the retail branch network
to support the strategies of customer orientation and retail financial services
focus, and (c) increased staffing levels in the mortgage banking network to ex-
pand the origination and sale of residential mortgages. These increases were
partially offset by the reduction of data processing personnel in connection
with the outsourcing of substantially all of the information systems functions
in May 1993. The Bank aggressively increased the staff of its real estate asset
management department by 27 FTEs during 1993, to handle increased foreclosures,
loan restructurings and REO sales.
The staffing level in the retail network increased due to improved ability to
fill open positions and an increased emphasis on providing investment products
to customers. The staffing level in the mortgage banking network also increased
due to the increased emphasis on meeting a broader range of customer real es-
tate borrowing requirements. The general rise in office-related expenses is due
to the higher staffing levels.
In addition to staffing increases, the Bank incurred higher personnel and bene-
fits costs related to (a) training costs associated with the data systems con-
versions and reorganization of the retail financial services group, (b) the
adoption in 1993 of a new accounting pronouncement related to retiree health
and life insurance benefits (as discussed below), (c) increased costs of em-
ployee insurance benefit and retirement plans, and (d) increased travel costs
associated with data systems conversion training and the exploration of strate-
gic alternatives and restructuring of the Bank.
Effective January 1, 1993, the Bank adopted SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Account-
ing for Post retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" for its unfunded post re-
tirement health care and life insurance program. This statement requires the
cost of post retirement benefits to be accrued during the service lives of em-
ployees. The Bank's previous practice was to expense these costs on a cash ba-
sis when incurred. The net periodic post retirement benefit cost for 1993 to-
taled $0.6 million.
See "Management - Executive Compensation" regarding certain steps taken by the
Bank to reduce operating expenses related to employee benefit plans.
The increase in the FDIC insurance expense in 1993, from the level of expense
in 1992, was primarily due to an increase in the rate the FDIC assessed to de-
posits in 1993, which was partially offset by a credit received from the FDIC
for the final distribution of the secondary reserve and from the reduced level
of deposits.
Professional services increased in 1993 over 1992 primarily due to financial
advisory fees associated with (a) costs of approximately $3.1 million incurred
in reviewing Fidelity's strategic objectives and developing a restructuring
plan and in the related asset valuation process and (b) higher outside data
services costs of approximately $3.0 million relative to the outsourcing of the
primary information systems functions in May 1993, which costs were partially
offset by some savings in compensation expense of approximately $1.0 million.
As previously discussed, amortization of intangibles included an $8.8 million
writedown of goodwill in 1993.
Operating expense decreased by $0.8 million in 1992 from the level in 1991.
This decrease was caused principally due to (a) $0.3 million decrease in FDIC
insurance expense due to average deposit shrinkage during the assessment peri-
od, (b) a $0.4 million decrease in professional services due to reduction in
consulting expense, (c) a $1.0 million decrease in other operating expense due
to reductions in marketing expense and level of amortization of intangible as-
sets, and (d) a $0.6 million increase in capitalized costs due to an increase
in the number of loan originations (although the total dollar amount of loan
originations decreased in 1992 over 1991). These decreases were partially off-
set by a $1.2 million increase in personnel and benefits primarily due to in-
creases in personnel, severance and pension costs.
66
<PAGE>
The increase in operating expenses combined with the decrease in the total av-
erage asset size of the Company (from $5.5 billion at December 31, 1991 to $4.6
billion at December 31, 1992 and to $4.6 billion at December 31, 1993), re-
sulted in an increase in the operating expense ratio from 1.37% in 1991 to
1.52% in 1992 and 2.16% in 1993. The operating expense ratio would have been
1.97% for 1993 without the nonrecurring expenses directly related to the
Company's restructuring and the $8.8 million writedown of goodwill.
EFFICIENCY RATIO
The Bank's efficiency ratio worsened by 29.74 percentage points between the
year ended December 31, 1992 and 1993 due to unfavorable variances in net in-
terest income, noninterest expense and operating expenses. Asset quality prob-
lems adversely affected two of the components of the efficiency ratio; reduced
net interest income via an increase in nonperforming loans and mounting fore-
closure activities, which resulted in a decrease in interest-bearing assets and
lower asset yield; and higher operating expenses associated with the increased
staffing level described above. Additionally, the increased staffing levels in
the retail financial services network and mortgage banking network adversely
impacted the efficiency ratio. Although these increases resulted in increased
expense in the short-term, they should provide a foundation for potentially im-
proved performance in the future.
The Bank's efficiency ratio improved by approximately 3.64 percentage points
from 49.02% in 1991 to 45.38% in 1992, as a result of lower operating expenses
in 1992 compared to 1991 levels and increased noninterest income, partially
offset by lower interest income due to increases in nonperforming assets and a
smaller balance sheet.
An analysis of the change in the efficiency ratios during 1993 and 1992 is
shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1992
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
DECEMBER 31, 1992 DECEMBER 31, 1991
----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Change in efficiency ratio
caused by:
Decreased net interest
income (12.12)% (3.17)%
(Decreased) increased
noninterest income (10.70)% 5.24%
(Increased) decreased op-
erating expense (6.92)% 1.57%
-------- -------
Favorable (Unfavorable)
variance (29.74)% 3.64%
======== =======
</TABLE>
67
<PAGE>
ASSET QUALITY
At December 31, 1993, 20.8% of Fidelity's total loan portfolio (including loans
held for sale) consisted of California single family residences while another
71.2% consisted of California multifamily dwellings. At December 31, 1992,
21.1% of Fidelity's loan portfolio consisted of California single family resi-
dences and 70.2% consisted of California multifamily dwellings. Southern Cali-
fornia economic conditions have adversely impacted the credit risk profile of
the Bank's loan portfolio.
The Bank's performance was adversely affected by increased foreclosure activi-
ties of the Bank reflecting the continued weakness of the Southern California
economy and a depressed real estate market. Nonperforming assets increased
slightly to $235.6 million at December 31, 1993 from $234.4 million at December
31, 1992. Classified assets increased from $353.7 million in 1992 to $372.5
million at December 31, 1993. Troubled debt restructuring declined by $58.6
million in 1993 to $28.7 million as of December 31, 1993 compared to $87.3 mil-
lion at December 31, 1992. Asset quality details of Fidelity are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
NPAS:
Nonaccruing loans $ 93,475 $112,041
ISF 28,362 47,324
REO 122,226 88,659
REO GVA (8,442) (13,619)
--------- ---------
Total NPAs $235,621 $234,405
========= =========
Nonaccruing loans to total assets 2.13% 2.38%
========= =========
NPAs to total assets 5.37% 4.99%
========= =========
NPAS AND TDRS:
NPAs $235,621 $234,405
Classified TDRs 23,650 44,308
Nonclassified TDRs 5,062 42,996
--------- ---------
Total NPAs and TDRs $264,333 $321,709
========= =========
TDRs to total assets 0.65% 1.86%
========= =========
NPAs and TDRs to total assets 6.03% 6.85%
========= =========
CRITICIZED ASSETS:
NPAs $235,621 $234,405
Performing loans with increased risk 125,720 108,442
Real estate held for investment 11,161 10,891
--------- ---------
Total classified assets 372,502 353,738
Special Mention assets 199,826 146,411
--------- ---------
Total criticized assets $572,328 $500,149
========= =========
Classified assets to total assets 8.49% 7.53%
========= =========
Criticized assets to total assets 13.05% 10.65%
========= =========
NONPERFORMING ASSET RATIOS:
REO (including ISF) to NPAs 60.33% 52.20%
Foreclosed real estate to NPAs 48.29% 32.01%
Nonaccruing loans to NPAs 39.67% 47.80%
ISF to NPAs 12.04% 20.19%
</TABLE>
68
<PAGE>
There was a marked shift in the composition of NPAs in 1993. Foreclosed real
estate increased from 32.0% of NPAs at December 31, 1992 to 48.3% at December
31, 1993 while nonaccruing loans and in-substance foreclosures declined from
68.0% to 51.7% in the same time period. At December 31, 1993 and 1992, the
amount of ISFs totaled $28.4 million, and $47.3 million, respectively. This
shift would not have had a material impact on the results of operations had
this standard been in effect at December 31, 1993. TDRs decreased by $58.6 mil-
lion during 1993 as a number of borrowers were either able to return to the
original payment terms at the expiration of the modification period or the
loans migrated to nonperforming loans or REO. The average loan balance of loans
being modified also declined, further reducing TDRs. As of December 31, 1993,
classified assets were $372.5 million (8.49% of total assets), increasing from
$353.7 million (7.53% of total assets) at December 31, 1992, and $228.4 million
(4.46% of total assets) as of December 31, 1991. The increase in classified as-
sets in 1993 consisted primarily of a sharp increase in performing loans with
increased risk.
The increase in classified assets in 1992 primarily consisted of the increase
in NPAs of $109.7 million and the increase of performing loans with increased
risk of $19.3 million (primarily attributed to 25 multifamily residential loans
in Southern California and two commercial and industrial complexes in Southern
California). Total special mention assets increased by $53.4 million during
1993 due to an increase in delinquent loans and loans having delinquent prop-
erty taxes and as the result of increased internal review.
Total loan delinquencies decreased by $3.8 million during 1993. This decrease
was due primarily to the migration of loans delinquent 90 days and over to REO.
69
<PAGE>
The following table illustrates the trend of net delinquencies of the respec-
tive net loan portfolios:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Delinquencies by number of days:
30 to 59 days 0.92% 0.82%
60 to 89 days 0.64% 0.39%
90 days and over 2.15% 2.36%
--------- ---------
Loan delinquencies to net loan portfolio 3.71% 3.57%
========= =========
Delinquencies by property type:
Single family:
30 to 59 days $ 7,480 $ 7,939
60 to 89 days 2,497 3,665
90 days and over 12,661 14,064
--------- ---------
22,638 25,668
--------- ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 2.85% 3.00%
Multifamily (2 to 4 units):
30 to 59 days 3,599 1,432
60 to 89 days 1,707 1,180
90 days and over 15,652 6,372
--------- ---------
20,958 8,984
--------- ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 4.16% 1.70%
Multifamily (5 to 36 units):
30 to 59 days 16,948 15,927
60 to 89 days 12,770 9,241
90 days and over 34,746 33,627
--------- ---------
64,464 58,795
--------- ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 3.60% 3.13%
Multifamily (37 units and over):
30 to 59 days 4,114 5,623
60 to 89 days 5,035 1,223
90 days and over 4,358 23,691
--------- ---------
13,507 30,537
--------- ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 3.35% 6.89%
Commercial & Industrial:
30 to 59 days 2,048 1,807
60 to 89 days 1,723 -
90 days and over 12,443 15,772
--------- ---------
16,214 17,579
--------- ---------
Percent to respective loan portfolio 5.45% 5.05%
Total loan delinquencies, net $137,781 $141,563
========= =========
</TABLE>
70
<PAGE>
The Bank recorded additions to its allowances for estimated loan and real es-
tate losses totaling $95.3 million during 1993 compared to $69.0 million in
1992. These provisions have been made in response to continuing deterioration
of the Bank's loan portfolio. In the opinion of the Bank, this deterioration
has been caused by the decline in apartment occupancy levels and of rents
available to apartment owners in Southern California; downward revisions in
projections as to inflation and rental income growth; the increased returns
currently being required by purchasers of multifamily income-producing proper-
ties; announced cutbacks in public sector spending; the general illiquidity in
the Southern California market for multifamily income-producing properties;
and the continuing high level of unemployment in and migration of skilled and
white collar labor from Southern California. The Bank's combined GVA for loan
and real estate losses at December 31, 1993 was $80.0 million or 2.03% of to-
tal loans and real estate up from $75.6 million or 1.82% at December 31, 1992
and $52.4 million or 1.13% at December 31, 1991.
The following table summarizes Fidelity's reserves, writedowns and certain
coverage ratios at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans:
GVA $ 71,578 $60,802
Specific reserves 12,254 3,475
--------- ---------
Total allowance for estimated losses $ 83,832 $64,277
========= =========
Writedowns(1) $ 4,251 $ 5,574
========= =========
Total allowance and loan writedowns to gross loans 2.32% 1.72%
Loan GVA to loans and ISF 1.88% 1.49%
Loan GVA to nonaccruing loans and ISF 58.75% 38.15%
Nonperforming loans to total loans 2.52% 2.83%
Owned Real Estate (including ISF and real estate held
for investment):
REO GVA $ 8,442 $13,619
GVA on real estate held for investment - 1,200
Specific reserves 9,273 1,631
--------- ---------
Total allowance for estimated losses $ 17,715 $16,450
========= =========
Writedowns(1) $ 90,901 $79,041
========= =========
Total REO allowance and REO writedowns to gross REO 37.41% 34.97%
REO GVA to REO (excluding ISF)(2) 6.91% 15.36%
Total Loans and REO:
GVA $ 80,020 $75,621
Specific reserves 21,527 5,106
--------- ---------
Total allowance for estimated losses $101,547 $80,727
========= =========
Writedowns(1) $ 95,152 $84,615
========= =========
Total allowance and writedowns to gross loans and REO
(including ISF) 4.87% 3.88%
Total GVA to loans and REO (including ISF)(2) 2.03% 1.82%
Total GVA to NPAs(2) 32.79% 30.49%
</TABLE>
(1) Writedowns include cumulative charge-offs taken on outstanding loans and
REO as of the date indicated.
(2) Loans, REO and NPAs in these ratios are calculated prior to the reduction
for loan and REO GVA, but are net of specific reserves.
71
<PAGE>
During current market conditions, the Bank rarely sells REO for a price equal
to or greater than the loan balance, and the losses suffered are impacted by
the market factors discussed elsewhere in this Offering Circular. REO is re-
corded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the subject
loan or the fair market value of the asset received. The fair market value of
the asset received is based upon a current appraisal adjusted for estimated
carrying, rehabilitation and selling costs. The Bank's policy has been gener-
ally to proceed promptly to market the properties acquired through foreclosure,
and the Bank often makes financing terms available to buyers of such proper-
ties. Generally, the Bank experiences higher losses on sales of REO properties
for all cash, as opposed to financing the sale. However, by financing the sale,
the Bank incurs the risk that the loan may not be repaid. During 1993, the Bank
sold 210 REO properties for net sales proceeds of $83.5 million, with a gross
book and net book value totaling $138.5 million and $89.8 million, respective-
ly. This compares to 43 properties sold in 1992 for net sales proceeds of $25.6
million, with a gross book and net book value of $34.9 million and $27.6 mil-
lion, respectively. The Bank made 107 loans in connection with the sale of REO
for the year ended December 31, 1993 for a total of $51.6 million. Of these,
$10.9 million contained terms favorable to the borrower that were not available
for the purchase of non-REO property. The comparable data for 1992 were 15
loans for $11.2 million, of which $10.7 million were made on terms favorable to
the borrower. The loss on sale of REO (i.e., the shortfall between the net pro-
ceeds and net book value) is charged to the REO GVA upon sale.
During 1993, 1992 and 1991, the Bank charged off a total of $79.4 million,
$41.2 million and $25.6 million, respectively, on loans and on REO. The follow-
ing table indicates the charge-offs and recoveries by property type for the re-
spective years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
PROPERTIES TOTAL PROPERTIES TOTAL PROPERTIES TOTAL
---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in millions)
CHARGE OFFS:
Properties in Califor-
nia:
Multifamily (2 units
and over) 311 $70.8 92 $27.8 12 $4.6
Commercial 11 3.9 11 9.6 3 0.3
Single family resi-
dences 64 3.5 36 1.7 4 0.1
Single family develop-
ment projects - - - - 2 5.5
Hotels 1 0.9 - - 3 2.9
Out-of-State proper-
ties:
Commercial 2 0.3 2 2.1 2 3.8
Hotels - - - - 2 7.4
Multifamily (2 units
and over) - - - - 3 1.0
---------- ------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------
Total charge-offs 389 79.4 141 41.2 31 25.6
========== ========== =========
Recoveries 129 5.0 13 0.5 11 3.0
========== ------- ========== -------- ========= ---------
Net charge-offs $74.4 $40.7 $22.6
======= ======== =========
</TABLE>
72
<PAGE>
The following table presents loan and REO charge-offs by property type and year
of loan origination for the year ended December 31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
1979 TO
TOTAL 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987
----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in millions)
PROPERTY TYPE:
Single Family $ 3.5 $ - $0.3 $ 2.1 $ 0.8 $ 0.3 $ -
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 5.0 - 0.1 3.6 0.8 0.4 0.1
5 to 36 units 44.0 0.1 6.0 21.7 7.4 4.5 4.3
37 units and over 21.8 - 0.8 9.1 0.9 5.0 6.0
----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- -------
Total multifamily 70.8 0.1 6.9 34.4 9.1 9.9 10.4
Commercial and industrial 5.1 - - - 0.5 1.1 3.5
----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- -------
Total charge-offs $79.4 $0.1 $7.2 $36.5 $10.4 $11.3 $ 13.9
===== ==== ==== ===== ===== ===== =======
</TABLE>
The following table presents loan and REO charge-offs by property type and year
of loan origination for the year ended December 31, 1992:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
1979 TO
TOTAL 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987
----- ---- ----- ----- ---- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in millions)
PROPERTY TYPE:
Single Family $ 1.7 $0.2 $ 1.1 $ 0.3 $ - $ 0.1
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 2.2 - 1.9 0.3 - -
5 to 36 units 12.4 0.2 7.7 2.1 0.3 2.1
37 units and over 13.2 0.7 1.6 3.5 4.0 3.4
----- ---- ----- ----- ---- -------
Total multifamily 27.8 0.9 11.2 5.9 4.3 5.5
Commercial and industrial 11.7 - 0.7 - 0.7 10.3
----- ---- ----- ----- ---- -------
Total charge-offs $41.2 $1.1 $13.0 $ 6.2 $5.0 $ 15.9
===== ==== ===== ===== ==== =======
</TABLE>
73
<PAGE>
The following table presents Fidelity's real estate loan portfolio (including
loans held for sale) as of December 31, 1993 by year of origination and type of
security:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
1987 AND
TOTAL 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 PRIOR
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
PROPERTY TYPE:
Single family $ 792,054 $118,802 $ 54,035 $ 40,417 $105,854 $ 73,466 $149,435 $ 250,045
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 505,219 36,822 23,892 50,069 139,430 77,837 100,182 76,987
5 to 36 units 1,795,374 92,798 118,176 205,279 479,998 216,091 273,376 409,656
37 units and over 406,330 12,861 15,753 8,049 59,566 75,111 62,990 172,000
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total multifamily 2,706,923 142,481 157,821 263,397 678,994 369,039 436,548 658,643
Commercial and
industrial 299,497 1,332 815 729 11,532 53,936 65,239 165,914
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total mortgage loans
receivable $3,798,474 $262,615 $212,671 $304,543 $796,380 $496,441 $651,222 $1,074,602
========== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ==========
Loans by year to total 100% 6.9% 5.6% 8.0% 21.0% 13.1% 17.1% 28.3%
</TABLE>
During the years 1990, 1989 and 1988, Fidelity originated loans at peak levels
totaling $1,211.3 million, $897.6 million and $1,467.1 million, respectively.
During 1993, the Bank reserved and/or charged off amounts corresponding to
these peak origination years totaling $36.5 million, $10.4 million and $11.3
million, respectively. These losses were due primarily to the decline of the
California economy and real estate market. Multifamily (5 or more units) and
commercial loans accounted for a substantial percentage of such losses, and as
a result, the Bank has reduced recent loan origination activities in these
areas.
The ongoing uncertainty in the Southern California economy, the weak real es-
tate market and the level of the Bank's nonperforming assets continue to be
significant concerns to the Company. The Bank increased the staff of the Real
Estate Asset Management ("REAM") Group in 1993 from 13 to 40 in order to handle
the increased number of foreclosed properties and the increased volume of loan
workout requests. In 1993, the REAM Group sold 210 properties, generating net
sales proceeds of $83.5 million and restructured loans with an aggregate gross
book value of $89.1 million. These increased loan workout activities are ex-
pected to continue in 1994, due primarily to the January 1994 Northridge Earth-
quake, property tax delinquencies and the continued soft real estate market.
The REAM Group shifted its focus to bulk sales transactions in 1994 and concen-
trated its efforts on the management of its real estate assets.
74
<PAGE>
As of December 31, 1993, Fidelity's 15 largest borrowers accounted for $250.9
million of gross loans. A number of these borrowing relationships also include
Fidelity's largest loans. Details of these relationships follow:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER TOTAL AMOUNTS LARGEST
BORROWER OF LOANS OF LOANS SINGLE LOAN
-------- -------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
1 2 $ 32,593 $32,555
2 46(1) 31,486(2) 9,934
3 9 27,340(2) 11,122
4 3 23,880 15,081
5 3 20,714(2) 13,912
6 55 16,159 6,570
7 1 13,929 13,929
8 3 13,810 13,682
9 2 11,355 5,845
10 3 11,057 6,826
11 1 10,253 10,253
12 9 10,229(2) 3,484
13 1 10,056 10,056
14 1 9,276 9,276
15 3 8,765(2) 7,550
-------------
$250,902
=============
</TABLE>
(1) Includes nine loans totaling $8.0 million that were considered ISF as of
December 31, 1993.
(2) Amounts are shown net of participations.
Fidelity's 10 largest loans aggregated $139.8 million at December 31, 1993, of
which $53.6 million was classified as Substandard and $37.9 million was catego-
rized as Special Mention. As of December 31, 1993, four of Fidelity's five
largest borrowers and four of Fidelity's 15 largest borrowers had loans either
considered nonperforming or performing with increased risk.
See "Three Months Ended March 31, 1994 Compared with Three Months Ended Decem-
ber 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993 - Asset Quality."
Adequacy of GVA
It is the Bank's practice to review the adequacy of its GVA on loans and real
estate owned on a quarterly basis. The Bank uses two methodologies in determin-
ing the adequacy of its GVA. These are delinquency migration and classification
methods. The delinquency migration method attempts to capture the potential fu-
ture losses as of a particular date associated with a given portfolio of loans,
based on the Bank's own historical experience over a given period of time, in a
four-step process: first, estimate the percentage of a given portfolio of per-
forming loans which will become newly delinquent; second, evaluate the proba-
bility that new delinquent loans will become REO; third, calculate the histori-
cal loss ratio on REO and other problem loans; and fourth, derive the resulting
potential losses for the portfolio of performing loans by multiplying the cor-
responding potential amount of REO with the reserve factor.
The likelihood that new delinquent loans will become REO is estimated histori-
cally by tracing the percentage of the balances of a given set of new delin-
quent loans that have migrated toward an increasingly worse credit status:
i.e., the percentage of the balances of 30 to 59 days delinquent loans that
have become 60 to 89 days delinquent; then the percentage of the balances of
these loans that have become at least 90 days delinquent; and the percentage of
the balances of these loans which have become REO. To ensure that the histori-
cally derived percentages are calculated on a consistent basis, only those
loans that have become newly delinquent are traced through the different stages
of delinquencies all the way to REO.
75
<PAGE>
The total projected loss associated with a given portfolio of performing and
nonperforming loans and REO is calculated by summing the losses corresponding
to each credit status category at a given point in time. The result is sensi-
tive to a number of factors, including the historical period over which the es-
timates are derived; the growth pattern of the portfolio, the composition of
the portfolio and the stability of the underwriting criteria over the period
covered.
The Bank has derived migration statistics over past periods and updates them
quarterly to take into account the most recent trends. The Bank applied the re-
sults of such methodology with respect to the December 31, 1993 financial
statements and the Bank updates its analysis quarterly. The Bank observed an
increasing delinquency trend as a percentage of the net real estate loan port-
folio and during 1993, as property values deteriorated, the resulting histori-
cal loss ratios increased. Continuation of these trends may increase the his-
torical loss ratios in 1994.
The second methodology for determining the adequacy of GVA is the classifica-
tion method. During 1993, the Bank utilized this approach to analyze classifi-
cations including Pass, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. A re-
serve factor is applied to each aggregate classification level by asset collat-
eral type in an effort to estimate the loss content in the portfolio.
Fidelity's actual loss experience with Pass and Special Mention assets is 0.0%
while the actual loss experience on Substandard assets is 23.5%. Again, the
Bank has observed an increase of classified loans at all levels which will in-
evitably lead to increased estimates of loss exposure under this method.
Each quarter, the Bank calculates a range of loss using both methodologies.
Once a range is established, Fidelity applies judgment and a knowledge of par-
ticular credits, trends in the market, and other factors to estimate the GVA
amount. As of December 31, 1993, the Bank's GVA was approximately $80.0 mil-
lion.
Once a GVA is estimated, the Bank applies three separate stress tests to the
portfolio to analyze the ability of the Bank to maintain adequate capital lev-
els under different economic scenarios. This process is considered appropriate
given the weak economy and the unstable market in which the Bank operates. The
scenarios range from mild change (continuation of current rates of loss migra-
tion and expected percentage loss estimates) to severe change (the worst expe-
rience in the 1980s in Texas and Arizona). The Bank's peak loan balance was
reached in late 1990 and early 1991. The stress tests assume the losses in the
peak portfolio will be experienced for the most part over a five-year cycle and
that three years of this cycle has lapsed. The peak portfolio performance is
stressed with a variety of projected levels of NPA, REO, and loss on sale of
REO. Projected losses are first absorbed by current levels of GVA, then by
forecasted Bank earnings over the remaining three years of the assumed cycle.
Tangible capital ratios are then calculated for each of the economic scenarios.
If the OTS disagrees with management's assessment of the adequacy of such re-
serves, it can effectively require Fidelity to increase its reserves to levels
satisfactory to the OTS. The Bank increased its GVA for losses on loans and
real estate to approximately $80.0 million at year-end 1993 from its third
quarter 1993 level of approximately $71.0 million in part to address OTS con-
cerns regarding the Bank's asset quality. If the Restructuring and Recapitali-
zation is not successful and the Bank has no viable problem asset disposition
alternative, the Bank anticipates that it may be required to increase its GVA
to higher levels that cannot currently be determined.
Approximately 71.1% of Fidelity's loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by
multifamily properties at December 31, 1993. Although, in the opinion of man-
agement, this portfolio is less sensitive to the effects of the recession than
those of institutions which have emphasized commercial and/or construction
lending, it is likely to be more sensitive than the portfolios of institutions
which have placed greater emphasis on single family residential lending.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
Fidelity's assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature and are af-
fected most directly by changes in interest rates rather than other elements of
the Consumer Price Index. As a result, increases in the prices of goods and
services do not have a significant impact on the Bank's results of operations.
76
<PAGE>
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Fidelity continues to reduce its IRR exposure by originating ARM loans for its
portfolio. Since 1985, the Bank has consistently moved toward building a port-
folio consisting predominantly of interest rate sensitive loans. ARM loans com-
prised 96% of the portfolio of total loans at December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991.
The percentage of monthly adjustable ARMs to total loans was 75% at December
31, 1993, 74% at December 31, 1992, and 72% at December 31, 1991. Interest sen-
sitive assets provide the Bank with long-term protection from rising interest
rates.
The Bank is also emphasizing the growth of its transaction account base to re-
duce its overall cost of funds. The ratio of retail transaction accounts, money
market savings and passbook accounts to total deposits decreased to 21.6% at
December 31, 1993 from 24.3% at December 31, 1992 and increased from 19.4% at
December 31, 1991.
At December 31, 1993, the Bank had synthetic hedges with a total notional prin-
cipal amount of $250 million. These were composed of interest rate swap con-
tracts with an average receive rate of 4.84% and a current pay rate of 3.43%.
These contracts support the Bank's total risk management by lengthening certain
short-term assets and shortening certain long-term liabilities.
In 1993, the Bank also sold options to enter into swap contracts with a
notional principal amount of $200 million. These options give the buyers the
right to cancel the swap agreements at a specified future date and if not can-
celed, provide the Bank with additional synthetic hedges. During the life of
the agreement, the Bank receives a fixed interest rate and pays a floating in-
terest rate tied to LIBOR. At December 31, 1993, the average fixed receive rate
was 5.00% and the average pay rate was 3.34%. The swap options were held as
trading positions during the option period and were carried at market value
with gains and losses recorded. In January 1994, the options to cancel were not
exercised and the average fixed receive rate adjusted to 4.70%. The swaps have
remaining maturities of less than four years.
Fidelity's IRR management plan is reviewed on a continuing basis. At December
31, 1993, the Bank's interest rate risk exposure was less than half of the ex-
posure that the OTS considers to be above normal. See "Business - Regulation
and Supervision - FIRREA Capital Requirements." Even at this lower risk level,
due to the lag effect that COFI has on Fidelity's loan portfolio the decline in
short-term rates from 1990 to early 1993 contributed significantly to the
Company's net interest margin. Recent stable rates during 1993 have eroded this
margin, and an increase in rates could produce an initial reduction in net in-
terest income. Management intends to continue to manage its IRR exposure
through introducing products tied to indices that reprice without a timing lag
and by using hedging techniques.
In 1990, Fidelity purchased interest rate caps to protect against rising rates.
In 1993, the final $400 million of interest rate caps matured and were not re-
newed. During 1992 and the first six months of 1993, the average maturity of
the Bank's liabilities lengthened, due primarily to customer preference for
longer term CDs. To maintain its target risk position, Fidelity entered inter-
est rate swap contracts to synthetically shorten the maturity of these liabili-
ties.
77
<PAGE>
Gap Analysis
Fidelity's Gap between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities due
within one year was a negative 3.43% and a positive 6.12% of total assets at
December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively. The following table of projected ma-
turities and repricings details major financial asset and liability categories
of Fidelity as of December 31, 1993. Projected maturities are based on contrac-
tual maturities as adjusted for estimates of prepayments and normal historical
amortization. (Prepayment estimates are based on recent portfolio experience of
approximately 15% Constant Prepayment Rate ("CPR") on all residential 1 to 4
unit loans and 10% on all other loans.) While the estimated prepayment rates
utilized are based on the best information available to the Bank, there can be
no assurance that the projected rates used in developing this table will coin-
cide with the actual results.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1993 MATURITY OR REPRICING
0-3 4-12 1-5 6-10 OVER 10
MONTHS MONTHS YEARS YEARS YEARS TOTAL
---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:
Cash and cash equiva-
lents $ 62,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 62,690
Investment Securi-
ties(1)(2) - 54,587 97,094 1,143 - 152,824
Mortgage-backed securi-
ties(1) 39,669 8,885 42,059 - - 90,613
Loans receivable:
ARMs and other
adjustables(3) 2,877,329 492,028 257,768 22,472 117 3,649,714
Fixed rate loans 54,701 348 8,219 4,616 81,968 149,852
Consumer and other
loans 5,332 2,408 1,258 - - 8,998
---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Gross loans receivable 2,937,362 494,784 267,245 27,088 82,085 3,808,564
---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total 3,039,721 558,256 406,398 28,231 82,085 $4,114,691
---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ==========
INTEREST-BEARING LIABIL-
ITIES:
Deposits:
Checking and savings
accounts 396,201 - - - - $ 396,201
Money market ac-
counts(4) 280,474 - - - - 280,474
Fixed maturity deposits
Retail customers 961,634 964,895 530,056 330 - 2,456,915
Wholesale customers 100,353 70,592 11,173 - - 182,118
---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total 1,738,662 1,035,487 541,229 330 - 3,315,708
Borrowings:
FHLB Advances(3) 216,400 - 90,000 20,000 - 326,400
Other 307,830 - 100,000 60,000 - 467,830
---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total 524,230 - 190,000 80,000 - 794,230
---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ----------
Total 2,262,892 1,035,487 731,229 80,330 - $4,109,938
==========
IMPACT OF HEDGING(5) (400,000) (50,000) 450,000 - -
---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------
MATURITY GAP $ 376,829 $ (527,231) $125,169 $(52,099) $82,085
========== ========== ========= ========= =========
GAP TO TOTAL ASSETS 8.60% (12.03)% 2.86% (1.19)% 1.87%
========== ========== ========= ========= =========
CUMULATIVE GAP TO TOTAL
ASSETS 8.60% (3.43)% (0.58)% (1.76)% 0.11%
========== ========== ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
(1) Maturities shown are based on the contractual maturity of the instrument.
(2) Includes investments in FHLB and FRB stock and cash equivalents
(3) ARMs and variable rate FHLB advances are in the "within 0-3 months" catego-
ries as they are subject to interest rate adjustments.
(4) These liabilities are subject to daily adjustments and are therefore in-
cluded in the "within 0-3 months" category.
(5) Fidelity had synthetic hedges with a total notional principal amount of
$450 million at December 31, 1993. These off-balance sheet instruments sup-
port the Bank's total risk management by enhancing yield and altering its
exposure to interest rate risk.
78
<PAGE>
SOURCES OF FUNDS AND LIQUIDITY
The Bank's primary sources of operating funds are deposits, borrowings, loan
payments and prepayments, loan sales and earnings.
Deposit activity is an important factor in Fidelity's cash flow position. At
March 31, 1994, Fidelity had deposits of $3.2 billion, down from $3.4 billion
at December 31, 1993. At December 31, 1993, Fidelity had deposits of $3.5 bil-
lion at December 31, 1992 and $3.9 billion at December 31, 1991. These reduc-
tions have been, in part, the natural result of the Bank's determination to re-
duce total assets and, in part, the result of the need on the part of its de-
positors to withdraw funds to meet current living expenses and/or increase
yields through other investments.
As a part of its strategy of preserving and enhancing the value of its customer
franchise, Fidelity has increasingly focused its efforts on attracting and re-
taining a greater number of profitable, low-cost transaction accounts, such as
checking, passbook and money market accounts. The ratio of total transaction
accounts to total deposits at March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993, March 31,
1993, December 31, 1992 and December 31, 1991, amounted to 24.0%, 21.7%, 25.1%,
24.3% and 19.4%, respectively. At March 31, 1994 Fidelity had 98,648 checking
accounts and 29,485 passbook accounts compared to 93,493 and 28,086 at December
31, 1993, 81,851 and 25,624 at March 31, 1993, 77,400 and 24,300 at December
31, 1992 and 65,400 and 19,700 at December 31, 1991. The number of money market
savings accounts declined from 21,600 at December 31, 1991 to 18,800 at Decem-
ber 31, 1992, to 18,400 at March 31, 1993, to 15,200 at December 31, 1993 to
14,500 at March 31, 1994, primarily due to decreasing interest rates during
those periods.
In the first quarter of 1994 compared to the prior quarter, the total balance
of certificates of deposit decreased by $0.2 million to $2.4 billion while re-
tail transaction accounts (checking, passbook and money market savings) in-
creased by $28.1 million to $757.7 million. During 1993, the total balance of
certificates of deposit increased by $22.3 million to $2.6 billion, while the
total balance of retail transaction accounts and other lower-cost accounts de-
creased by $111.6 million to $729.6 million. These reductions in total balance
have been influenced by lower rates of interest offered on retail accounts,
causing depositors to seek increased yields through other investments. On March
31, 1994, certificates of deposit over $100,000 represented 13% of total depos-
its compared to 14% at December 31, 1993, 16% at December 31, 1992 and 16% at
December 31, 1991. Broker originated deposits totaling $37.4 million, $92.2
million, $20.1 million, $12.9 million and $-0- were included in certificates of
deposit at these dates.
The Bank also restructured its branch network with an emphasis on providing re-
tail financial services to its customers. In order to provide a more complete
array of products to meet the Bank's customers' needs and to capture funds mov-
ing out of traditional bank products into higher yield investments, sales of
investment products were integrated into the retail network, and new positions
and compensation systems have been developed and implemented. In the three
months ended March 31, 1994, the Company, through Gateway, sold investment and
annuity products totaling $24.7 million, compared with total sales of $16.7
million and $36.3 million in the three months ended December 31, 1993 and March
31, 1993, respectively. In 1993, the Company sold investment and annuities
products totaling $96.4 million, compared with total sales of $79.9 million in
1992 and $57.8 million in 1991.
FHLB Advances are another major source of funds. The Bank increased its FHLB
Advances by $16.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 1994. This
compares to repayments exceeding advances by $30.0 million and $ 110.0 million
for the three months ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively.
At December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, the outstanding balances were $326.4 mil-
lion, $581.4 million and $325.0 million, respectively.
In an ongoing effort to diversify its funding source, the Bank started issuing
commercial paper during the third quarter of 1992. The commercial paper is
backed by a letter of credit from the FHLB of San Francisco to ensure a high
quality investment grade rating. Fidelity's obligation to reimburse the FHLB
for any amounts paid under the letter of credit is secured by a pledge of mort-
gage loans by Fidelity to the FHLB. As of March 31, 1994, $254 million of com-
mercial paper was outstanding as compared to $304 million at December 31, 1993,
$260 million at March 31, 1993 and $65 million at December 31, 1992. The de-
creased use of FHLB Advances in 1993 as a source of funds resulted primarily
from the use of commercial paper, which is less costly, as an alternative
source of funds.
79
<PAGE>
The Bank also enters into reverse repurchase agreements ("repos") whereby the
Bank sells securities under agreements to repurchase the securities at a spe-
cific price and date. The Bank deals only with dealers judged by management to
be financially strong or who are recognized as primary dealers in U.S. Treasury
securities by the FRB. In the three months ended March 31, 1994 and December
31, 1993, however, repos were reduced by $3.8 million and $100.6 million, re-
spectively. In the three months ended March 31, 1993, $112.0 million of net
funds were provided by repo activity. In 1993, $3.8 million of net funds were
provided by repo activity.
Loan principal payments, including prepayments, were a significant source of
funds in 1993 and the first quarter of 1994, providing $58.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 1994, compared to $55.6 million and $70.5 million
for the three months ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively,
and $290.0 million in 1993, compared to $469.0 million in 1992 and $408.0 mil-
lion in 1991. The Bank expects that loan payments and prepayments will remain a
significant funding source in the future.
Another source of operating funds was proceeds from the sale of loans which to-
taled $208.0 million, $65.7 million and $3.6 million in the three months ended
March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, and $138.4 million,
$204.4 million and $282.7 million in the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992
and 1991, respectively. Included in the first quarter of 1994 loan sales was
$155.3 million in single family and multifamily 2 to 4 unit performing loans
sold as part of the Bank's overall capital planning which resulted in a $1.9
million loss. Sales of loans are dependent upon various factors, including vol-
ume of loans originated, interest rate movements, investor demand for loan
products, deposit flows, the availability and attractiveness of other sources
of funds, loan demand by borrowers, desired asset size and evolving capital and
liquidity requirements. Due to the volatility and unpredictability of these
factors, the volume of Fidelity's sales of loans has fluctuated significantly
and no estimate of future sales can be made at this time. At March 31, 1994,
the Bank had $190.1 million of loans in its held for sale portfolio compared to
$367.7 million and $24.2 million at December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, re-
spectively. These amounts did not include any loans included in the Bulk Sale
Assets.
The sale of investment and mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") also provides op-
erating funds to the Bank. During 1993, the Bank changed its investment strat-
egy and as a result moved its entire portfolio of investment and mortgage-
backed securities from the investment portfolio to the held for sale portfolio.
No U.S. Treasury or agency securities were sold in the first quarters of 1994
or 1993; however, in the fourth quarter of 1993, $211.3 million was sold. Pro-
ceeds from sales of MBS for the three months ended March 31, 1994 totaled $93.6
million, compared to $316.5 million and no sales for the three-month periods
ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively. Sales of investment
securities totaled $351.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1993, com-
pared to no such sales in 1992 and $1.5 million in 1991. Sales of MBS totaled
$522.1 million in 1993 compared to no such sales during 1992 and to $273.0 mil-
lion in sales during 1991.
Sales of loans from the held for investment portfolio would be caused by unu-
sual events. The level of future sales, if any, is difficult to predict. During
1993, the Bank approved a policy of more active management of its investment
portfolio with a view toward disposition of securities and loans with unfavor-
able risk/return profiles. This policy may result in loans being reclassified
from held for investment to held for sale. Any subsequent sale of such loans
would not generally be expected to result in any material gain or loss. The
higher level of sales of loans and MBS in the first quarter of 1994 and in 1993
was the result of efforts to reduce Fidelity's asset size for capital planning
purposes. All such loan sales were made from Fidelity's held for sale portfolio
and all such MBS sales were made from the Bank's available for sale portfolio.
Fidelity's sources of cash are utilized in funding loans and investments, for
payment of its debt obligations and in maintaining a liquidity ratio in compli-
ance with regulatory requirements. Fidelity's total loans funded (excluding
Fidelity's refinances) were $130.6 million in the three months ended March 31,
1994 compared to $152.1 million and $69.0 million in the three-month periods
ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively, and $383 million in
the year ended December 31, 1993 versus $386 million in the corresponding 1992
period. The Bank had commitments outstanding to originate $28.6 million in
loans at market interest rates at March 31, 1994, compared to $37.9 million at
December 31, 1993, $16.5 million at March 31, 1993 and $37.5 million at Decem-
ber 31, 1992. At March 31, 1994, the Bank had a total of $121.5 million of un-
funded loans in its pipeline, compared to $155.8 million at December 31, 1993,
$59.0 million at March 31, 1993 and $138.1 million at December 31, 1992.
80
<PAGE>
The overall decline in the loan pipeline from the first quarter of 1993 re-
sulted from: (a) the decision by the Bank to limit multifamily loan origina-
tions in accordance with the Bank's more rigorous view of multifamily loans as,
in fact, business loans which require considerably more scrutiny and continuous
monitoring, (b) the reorganization of the mortgage banking group associated
with the development and implementation of the Bank's strategy in building a
mortgage banking division geared toward single family residental loan origina-
tions, (c) the development of secondary marketing sources for multifamily orig-
inations, and (d) a reduction in market demand for products Fidelity desired
for its portfolio.
Fidelity had $50.0 million in the unused balance of available home equity
credit lines at March 31, 1994, compared to $52.1 million at December 31, 1993,
$64.6 million at March 31, 1993, $66.2 million at December 31, 1992 and $66.3
million at December 31, 1991. The decline in unused balances of home equity
credit lines is due to a slowdown in new credit facility growth over the peri-
od. New home equity credit lines totaled approximately $0.5 million, $1.1 mil-
lion, and $6.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 1994, December 31,
1993 and March 31, 1993, respectively, and $13.6 million, $26.9 million and
$42.5 million for the years 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. The decline in
new home equity lines reflected significant levels of first trust deed
refinancings as well as lower homeowner equity as single family housing ap-
praisals fell from higher values of prior years. In addition, the Bank imple-
mented a new $300 home equity application fee in May 1993 which also contrib-
uted to a home equity volume reduction.
OTS regulations require the maintenance of an average regulatory liquidity ra-
tio of at least 5% of deposits and short-term borrowings. Fidelity's monthly
average regulatory liquidity ratio was 8.8% and 5.3% for December 1993 and
1992, respectively, and 5.1% and 5.2% at March 31, 1994 and March 31, 1993, re-
spectively. Fidelity's year-end liquidity ratios were 6.1% in 1993 and 5.7% in
1992. Management believes the Bank has an adequate liquidity to meet foresee-
able operational demands.
Fidelity maintains other sources of liquidity to draw upon if unforeseen cir-
cumstances should occur. At March 31, 1994, these sources included: (a) pres-
ently available line of credit from the FHLB of $80.7 million (assuming all of
the $400.0 million capacity of commercial paper is used); (b) unused commercial
paper capacity of $146.0 million; (c) unpledged securities in the amount of
$107.4 million available to be placed in reverse repurchase agreements or sold;
and (d) unpledged loans of $626.7 million, of which some portion would be
available to collateralize additional FHLB or private borrowings, or which may
be securitized. In 1993, Fidelity received two capital contributions totaling
$28.0 million from Citadel.
For further information regarding the Bank's sources of funds, see "Business -
Sources of Funds."
OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING EARNINGS
Growing Emphasis on Fee Income Generation
Management believes that, given the highly competitive nature of the Bank's
historical business and the regulatory constraints it faces in competing with
unregulated companies, the Bank must expand from its historical business focus
and adopt a broader product line business strategy. Specifically, management
believes that the Bank's existing customers provide a ready market for the sale
of nontraditional financial services and investment products. This belief
prompted the implementation of a new business strategy for the retail financial
services group that integrated its traditional functions (mortgage origination,
deposit services, checking, savings, etc.) with the sale of investment services
and products by Gateway. Management's objective is to build a "relationship
bank" that works with clients to determine their financial needs and offers a
broad array of more customized products and services.
Through this new strategy of targeting retail and mortgage customers and offer-
ing a variety of new investment products and services, Fidelity and Gateway
hope to attract more of the Bank customers' deposits, investment accounts and
mortgage business. Management believes that this new strategy has been success-
ful, as evidenced by the increase of 21% in total checking accounts at December
31, 1993 over the level a year earlier and the increase of 5% and 20% in total
checking accounts at March 31, 1994 over the levels at December 31, 1993 and
March 31, 1993, respectively. As a result of this strategy, fee income should
become a growing portion, and net interest income a declining portion, of the
Company's total income.
81
<PAGE>
Management also intends to offer a wider range of loan types than the Bank cur-
rently originates. While continuing to offer adjustable rate mortgages and to
maintain an expertise in originating and servicing multifamily mortgages, the
Bank plans to increase its mortgage banking capabilities and to originate mort-
gages that, while not appropriate for inclusion in the Bank's portfolio in sig-
nificant quantities, are attractive to borrowers and to the secondary market.
See "Business - Retail Financial Services Group" for further information.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
See "Business - Regulation and Supervision."
82
<PAGE>
BUSINESS
GENERAL
Fidelity is a federally-chartered savings institution which operates through
42 branches, all of which are located in Southern California, principally in
Los Angeles and Orange counties. The Bank offers a broad range of consumer fi-
nancial services, including demand and term deposits and mortgage and consumer
loans. Fidelity is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citadel, which is a
financial services holding company engaged primarily in the savings bank busi-
ness through the Bank and Gateway.
At March 31, 1994, Fidelity's mortgage loan portfolio (including loans held
for sale) aggregated approximately $3.6 billion, of which approximately 72.6%
was secured by residential properties containing 2 or more apartment units,
19.0% was secured by single family residences and 8.4% was secured by commer-
cial property. At that same date, 96.1% of Fidelity's loans consisted of ad-
justable rate mortgages.
Fidelity funds its portfolio lending operations principally with deposits. At
March 31, 1994, Fidelity had deposits of approximately $2.7 billion, exclusive
of $507.7 million in certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more. Other
borrowings on that date included $342.7 million in FHLB advances, $100.0 mil-
lion in mortgage-backed borrowings, $254.0 million in commercial paper backed
by a letter of credit issued by the FHLB of San Francisco and $60.0 million in
subordinated debt that qualifies as supplementary Tier 2 regulatory capital.
Fidelity's deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC through the SAIF to the
maximum amount permissible by law. Fidelity is subject to the examination,
supervision and reporting requirements of the OTS, its primary federal banking
regulator. Fidelity is also subject to examination and supervision by the
FDIC. See "Regulation and Supervision."
Gateway became an NASD registered broker/dealer in October 1993. Gateway cur-
rently provides customers of the Bank with investment products including a
number of mutual funds, annuities and unit investment trusts. Fidelity is im-
plementing a new business strategy that integrates traditional banking func-
tions (mortgage originations and deposit services) with the sale of investment
services and products by Gateway. See "Retail Financial Services Group." Gate-
way is subject to the examination and supervision by the SEC and the NASD.
Recent Developments
Internal Reorganization; Restructuring and Recapitalization
In mid-1992, Fidelity and Citadel commenced a series of steps to reorganize
internally in order to strengthen the Bank's internal operations and meet the
needs of its customer base. First, a new Chief Executive Officer and certain
additional senior management personnel were hired to strengthen key areas of
future potential growth, such as mortgage banking, residential loan origina-
tions, credit administration, retail financial services and real estate man-
agement. Second, the Bank broadened the product line of loans originated by
the Bank and increased its emphasis on mortgage banking and single family
originations, in particular developing its loan pipeline hedging capability.
The Bank also reorganized its retail branch system to integrate the provision
of traditional banking services with the provision through Gateway of a
broader range of nontraditional financial services and uninsured investment
products. Third, the Bank upgraded its systems management capabilities by con-
verting to new computer systems in its retail banking and loan administration
operations and by adding enhanced software capability to the asset/liability
management function. Fourth, management has begun to implement stricter credit
controls and credit reviews. Finally, during the last quarter of 1993, the
Bank undertook analyses of its internal controls, staffing levels and in-house
staff functions. These analyses identified substantial cost-reduction opportu-
nities via consolidation of redundant functions, reduction in management and
staffing levels, closing, consolidating or selling certain branches and out-
sourcing of certain staff functions. Based upon such studies, management be-
lieves that operating expenses could be reduced in the future.
In October 1992, Citadel and Fidelity hired outside financial advisors to
identify and assess strategic alternatives to pursue with a view to maximizing
value for stockholders. In mid-1993, as an outgrowth of the reorganization ef-
fort, management evaluated the strategic alternatives available to it. In May
1994, Citadel and Fidelity decided to implement the Restructuring and Recapi-
talization. See "Restructuring and Recapitalization."
83
<PAGE>
OTS Examinations
In January 1994, the Bank received reports of the various regular examinations
conducted by the OTS in 1993. The OTS expressed concern in a number of spe-
cific areas principally relating to asset quality, asset review administration
and the resulting negative impact on capital levels and earnings, as well as
management effectiveness in certain areas. As a result of the findings of the
OTS in its safety and soundness examination of the Bank, Fidelity is subject
to higher examination assessments and is subject to additional regulatory re-
strictions including, but not limited to, (a) a prohibition, absent prior OTS
approval, on increases in total assets during any quarter in excess of an
amount equal to net interest credited on deposit liabilities during the quar-
ter; (b) a requirement that the Bank submit to the OTS for prior review and
approval the names of proposed new directors and executive officers and pro-
posed employment contracts with any director or senior officer; (c) a require-
ment that the Bank submit to the OTS for prior review and approval any third-
party contract outside the normal course of business; and (d) the ability of
the OTS, in its discretion, to require 30 days' prior notice of all transac-
tions between Fidelity and its affiliates (including Citadel and Gateway).
Management believes that Fidelity will cease to be subject to the foregoing
restrictions after consummation of the Restructuring and Recapitalization, and
that these transactions, together with other actions taken by management in
response to the concerns raised by the OTS in the 1993 report, will be respon-
sive to most of the concerns of the OTS. However, such restrictions will not
automatically be removed by the OTS and there can be no assurance as to
whether or when the OTS will remove such restrictions. In addition, the Re-
structuring does not significantly alleviate the OTS's concerns regarding the
concentration of Fidelity's loan portfolio in multifamily loans and certain
unfilled officer positions. See "Risk Factors - Certain Considerations Regard-
ing the Bank - Concentration in Multifamily Loans" and "New Management." Thus,
the OTS or the FDIC may require the Bank to address such (or any new) concerns
in the future.
Northridge Earthquake
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations--Three Months Ended March 31, 1994 Compared with Three Months
Ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993--Asset Quality" for information re-
garding the impact of the Northridge earthquake in January 1994 on the Bank's
asset quality. See also "Pro Forma Impact of the Bulk Sales on Loans and Other
Real Estate Assets" for the pro forma impact of the Bulk Sales and the Earth-
quake Accommodation Loans on the level of delinquencies at March 31, 1994.
RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP
In 1993, Fidelity reorganized internally to provide at each of its branch lo-
cations, either directly or through Gateway, a broad array of mortgage prod-
ucts, financial services and investment products to current and potential cus-
tomers.
Fidelity's deposits are highly concentrated in Los Angeles and Orange coun-
ties. Each of Fidelity's branches generally has between $40 million and $100
million in deposits. Seventeen of the branches are in the $40 million to $59
million range.
Total deposits at Fidelity have decreased since December 1991. Management be-
lieves that depositors have reacted to current low interest rates by placing
short-term fixed income investments into mutual funds and other uninsured
product alternatives.
Management believes that, given the highly competitive nature of the Bank's
historical business and the regulatory constraints it faces in competing with
unregulated companies, the Bank must expand from its historical business focus
and adopt a broader product line business strategy. Specifically, management
believes that the Bank's existing customers provide a ready market for the
sale of nontraditional financial services and investment products. This belief
prompted the implementation of a new business strategy for the retail finan-
cial services group that integrated its traditional functions (mortgage origi-
nation, deposit services, checking, savings, etc.) with the sale of investment
services and products by Gateway. Management's objective is to build a "rela-
tionship bank" that works with clients to determine their financial needs and
offers a broad array of more customized products and services.
Through this new strategy of targeting retail and mortgage customers and of-
fering a variety of new investment products and services, Fidelity and Gateway
hope to attract more of the Bank customers' deposits, investment accounts and
mortgage business. Management believes that this new strategy has been suc-
cessful, as evidenced by the increase of 21% in total checking accounts at
March 31, 1994 over the level a year earlier. As a result of this strategy,
fee income should become a growing portion, and net interest income a declin-
ing portion, of the Bank's total income.
84
<PAGE>
Gateway currently sells a combination of investment products including mutual
funds, annuities and unit investment trusts. Gateway offers mutual funds of a
number of well-known sponsors. The fixed and variable annuities that are of-
fered are issued by insurance companies all of which maintain a rating of A+
or better by A.M. Best. These product offerings are continually under review
and change from time to time depending on market demand, management's judgment
and product availability.
Management is pursuing several significant strategic partnerships to provide
new products and services. Gateway has signed agreements with Financial Hori-
zons, a subsidiary of Nationwide Insurance of Columbus, Ohio ("Nationwide") to
develop and promote a variety of new investment products. This program is
funded by Nationwide and involves no financial commitments on the part of
Gateway. Nationwide has also arranged to use Fidelity as a test candidate for
its lifestyle planning program. If the test works out satisfactorily, manage-
ment expects that this financial planning system will eventually be installed
branch-wide.
To implement its retail financial services strategy, Fidelity has reorganized
its management structure by forming a Retail Financial Services Group ("RFSG")
with 520 employees.
During 1993, Fidelity reorganized the personnel structure of its branches to
further its strategy of integrating investment services with its traditional
deposit activities. Most branches are now individual profit centers reporting
to a branch business manager who has responsibility for determining the sales
focus and resource allocation within the branch area. On average, branch
staffing consists of eight individuals who are divided into administrative
personnel and sales personnel, with a branch operations manager and a finan-
cial sales manager reporting to the business manager. The sales group merges
the responsibilities of the broker/dealer specialists and the traditional de-
posit products personnel into the role of a "relationship banker", responsible
for selling all deposit and nondeposit product offerings. Relationship bankers
will eventually be located at each branch.
In connection with its strategy of integrating investment services with its
traditional deposit activities, Fidelity seeks to conduct its activities in
compliance with the February 1994 interagency guidance of the federal bank and
thrift regulators on retail sales of uninsured, nondeposit investment products
by federally insured financial institutions. In order to minimize customer
confusion, Fidelity endeavors to ensure that customers are fully informed that
such investment products are not insured, are not deposits of or guaranteed by
the Bank and involve investment risk, including the potential loss of principal.
Also during 1993, Fidelity and Gateway retrained sales personnel as "relation-
ship bankers." The training program lasted four to eight weeks and covered
professional topics from accounting to sales management. The focus of this
program was to educate the managers about product offerings, identification of
customer needs and profitable operation of a business unit. Appropriate per-
sonnel are licensed to sell securities and insurance products. This retail
strategy is being reinforced through revised incentive and performance mea-
surements based in part on customer satisfaction levels. Such measurements
were implemented during 1993.
To support this new marketing effort, Fidelity upgraded its computer and re-
porting systems for tracking customer profiles and investment activities, for
monitoring demographic data for marketing purposes, and for updating new fi-
nancial products being offered. Fidelity is also employing customer surveys,
focus groups and private interviews to determine actual and potential customer
needs and desires and thereby to tailor its financial services and investment
products.
Management also intends to offer a wider range of loan types than the Bank
currently originates. While continuing to offer adjustable rate mortgages and
to maintain an expertise in originating and servicing multifamily mortgages,
the Bank plans to increase its mortgage banking capabilities and to originate
mortgages that, while not appropriate for inclusion in the Bank's portfolio in
significant quantities, are attractive to borrowers and to the secondary mar-
ket.
MORTGAGE BANKING GROUP OPERATIONS
The Bank conducts its residential real estate lending activities through its
Mortgage Banking Group. Operating as a Fidelity division, the Mortgage Banking
Group is responsible for originating single family and multifamily residential
real estate loans for retention in the Bank's loan portfolio or sale to sec-
ondary market investors and conduits. After receiving completed loan applica-
tions, the Bank reviews applicant credit history, obtains verification of em-
ployment and other pertinent
85
<PAGE>
financial information, confirms property value through appraisal and completes
a transaction evaluation and loan underwriting. Approved loans are then submit-
ted to the Bank's loan funding staff. Payment processing, collection and re-
lated loan functions are performed by the Bank's servicing employees. The ex-
tent of Fidelity's direct responsibility for applicant information collection
and verification may depend on whether business is sourced entirely through its
own employees (retail origination) or third parties (as in wholesale or corre-
spondent business).
The Mortgage Banking Group has adopted an operating strategy more similar to
that of a mortgage bank than a thrift or savings and loan institution. In the
second quarter of 1993, the Bank adopted a requirement that substantially all
loan originations meet secondary market standards, to enable the Bank to sell
or securitize more loans and thereby enhance its financial liquidity and oper-
ating flexibility. The Bank also enhanced its single family loan program fea-
tures and gave borrowers more competitive interest rate lock-in options for its
fixed-rate loan product offerings. The associated increase in the Bank's inter-
est rate risk was addressed through modifications of its secondary market capa-
bilities and operations.
From 1986 to mid-1992, the Bank had emphasized the origination and retention of
loans secured by multifamily property (2 or more units). From mid-1992 to pres-
ent, emphasis has been redirected toward originating single family residential
loans. At March 31, 1994, 72.6% of Fidelity's mortgage loan portfolio was se-
cured by residential properties containing two or more apartment units, 19.0%
by single family residential properties and 8.4% by other properties. At Decem-
ber 31, 1993, 71.0% of Fidelity's loan portfolio was secured by residential
properties containing two or more apartment units, 21% by single family resi-
dential properties and 8.0% by other properties. OTS capital regulations estab-
lished generally lower risk-based capital requirements for loans secured by
single family and multifamily properties with 36 or fewer units, than for com-
mercial and consumer loans. See "Regulation and Supervision - FIRREA Capital
Requirements."
In the first quarter of 1993, the Bank completed a reorganization of its real
estate lending operations. The loan origination function was separated into two
divisions: a Residential Production Division, focused on increasing the volume
of single family mortgages and two to four unit loan products; and a Major Loan
Production Division, responsible for the Bank's five or more unit residential
lending. The Bank also consolidated all "retail" mortgage application process-
ing and underwriting in one business unit located in its administration center.
All single family loan production personnel were relocated from regional lend-
ing offices and assigned to key branch locations, furthering the integration of
mortgage products into the Bank's retail financial services delivery system.
These actions resulted in the closure of two of the Bank's four existing re-
gional lending offices as well as the refocus of the remaining regional offices
solely on five unit or over loan originations.
The Bank also started a new business effort designed to increase single family
and two to four unit origination from third party loan brokers. A number of
staff additions were made in 1993 to implement this operational plan.
Fidelity's overall goal is to reposition itself in the residential lending
business as a secondary market, mortgage banking-oriented loan originator.
In retail loan origination, the Bank's employees have direct control over veri-
fication of necessary applicant income, deposit and credit information as well
as other important elements of the application process. This is in contrast to
third party mortgage origination or wholesale business, where approved loan
brokers assemble key application material and verifications and submit these
completed information packages to the Bank for underwriting, approval and fund-
ing. Wholesale mortgage origination offers the opportunity for increased loan
funding volume at lower fixed operational expense than would be possible
through retail mortgage origination. However, since a greater portion of the
application processing and information verification is performed by the third-
party loan brokers, wholesale business poses greater credit risk than retail
loan originations. The Bank has addressed this potential credit quality issue
through qualification standards for approval of new loan broker accounts as
well as underwriting practices and quality control procedures.
In addition to the structural reorganization of its multifamily loan origina-
tion function discussed above, the Bank took severe measures in 1993 to reposi-
tion its multifamily lending business orientation and to revise its multifamily
lending criteria. From January to April 1993, the Bank sharply curtailed new
multifamily loan generation by limiting new transactions to purchase money
funding or the refinancing of existing loans and reassigning key major loan
production staff to internal multifamily loan due diligence and property in-
spection teams. Significantly reduced multifamily business origination and
lower funding levels resulted from these actions.
86
<PAGE>
Over the January to April 1993 interval, the Bank reevaluated its multifamily
loan approval guidelines and operational practices, resulting in new underwrit-
ing procedures and more conservative qualifying standards. When multifamily
business origination was resumed in May 1993 the Major Loan Production Division
instituted a new multifamily property scoring system that establishes a numeri-
cal score and corresponding letter grade for each multifamily loan request. The
score and grade then determine qualifying loan-to-value ratios and debt service
coverage requirements, with higher-graded properties eligible for more favora-
ble underwriting guidelines. Transaction review procedures were also modified
so that multifamily transactions now require, at a minimum, two loan officer
signatures for final loan approval. The Bank believes these operational en-
hancements and evaluation measures provide adequate business credit quality and
are appropriate due to current adverse multifamily property operating economics
and market values in the geographic areas where the Bank's loan portfolio is
concentrated. While the Bank is aware that certain of its underwriting guide-
lines and standards may be more conservative than other local market competi-
tors, and thus may decrease new business volume, the Bank believes that the
multifamily origination effort remains competitive and increases the Bank's
ability to securitize the multifamily loan product.
Until the third quarter of 1993, almost all loans funded were generated through
employee loan personnel and outside loan agents. Outside loan agents are inde-
pendent real estate brokers who are compensated on a commission basis upon
funding of their loans. Beginning in the third quarter of 1993, however,
Fidelity's single family origination volume increasingly came from third party
loan brokers, reflecting the Bank's conscious decision to develop and expand
this residential mortgage origination channel as discussed above. In July 1993,
the Bank opened and staffed two loan origination offices devoted exclusively to
processing single family and two to four unit residential loan applications
from third party loan brokers or "wholesale" mortgage business. A third whole-
sale operations office became fully operational in October and another office
opened in Northern California in March 1994. The Bank plans to open additional
wholesale operations in 1994, including more offices in Northern California.
Fidelity made significant enhancements in its internal computer systems and re-
porting capabilities in 1993. In October, the Bank converted its loan servicing
operation to a new computer system which is expected to result in systems ex-
pense reduction in 1994. The Bank also installed a new automated loan applica-
tion processing and tracking computer system which will further its mortgage
banking and secondary marketing capabilities.
Multifamily Residential Loans
The Bank offers adjustable rate mortgage loans secured by apartment buildings
with 2 or more units with a maximum amortized loan term of 30 years, with some
loans having balloon payments due in 15 years. A majority of Fidelity's ARM
loans adjust with COFI, with a monthly interest rate adjustment commencing af-
ter an initial introduction period of up to six months. Since the borrower's
monthly payment amount adjusts only annually, if COFI increases, these loans
can negatively amortize if the monthly payment is not sufficient to pay in full
the additional interest accruing on the loan. Although multifamily loans in the
Bank's loan portfolio contain a due-on-sale clause, by their terms they are
generally transferable to a purchaser of the property if the purchaser meets
the Bank's credit standards.
Multifamily real estate lending entails certain risks different from those
posed by single family residential lending. Multifamily and commercial real es-
tate loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single bor-
rowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment experience on
loans secured by multifamily and commercial real estate is typically dependent
on the successful operation of the related real estate project and thus may be
subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market
or in the economy in general than are loans secured by single family proper-
ties. Multifamily ARM loans may have greater vulnerability to default than
fixed rate loans during times of increasing interest rates due to the potential
for increase in the amount of a borrower's payment obligations, while the bor-
rower's income from the property may not increase. See "ARM Loans."
On March 18, 1994, the OTS published a final regulation effective on that date
that permits a loan secured by multifamily residential property, regardless of
the number of units, to be risk-weighted at 50% for purposes of the risk-based
capital standards if the loan meets specified criteria relating to term of the
loan, timely payments of interest and principal, loan-to-value ratio and ratio
of net operating income to debt service requirements. Under the prior rule,
loans secured by multifamily residential properties with more than 36 units
were required to be risk-weighted at 100%.
87
<PAGE>
As of March 31, 1994, Fidelity held $414.5 million in loans secured by multi-
family residential properties with 37 or more units and formerly risk-weighted
at 100%, some of which qualify for 50% risk-weighting under the criteria of the
new regulation. The ultimate impact on Fidelity of the new regulation has not
been determined.
Single Family Residential Loans
The Bank offers single family residential mortgage loans with fixed interest
rates having maximum amortization loan terms of up to 30 years. Some single
family loan programs have maturities of only 15 years or balloon payments due
in 5 or 7 years. Due to the interest rate risk presented by the holding of
fixed rate loans combined with variable cost sources of funding, the Bank sells
substantially all originations of fixed rate residential 1 to 4 unit loans to
secondary market investors. While this reduces the interest rate exposure from
a portfolio investor standpoint, there remains the risk associated with adverse
movements in interest rates from the date of loan application to approval, in-
vestor settlement and final delivery. In the second quarter of 1993, Fidelity
modified and augmented internal policies to provide for greater management con-
trol of loan pipeline interest rate risk exposure. During the same quarter, the
Bank also entered into a consulting arrangement with a nationally recognized
organization for daily pipeline valuation services, hedging strategies and
trading execution. This agreement provided Fidelity a sophisticated computer-
based valuation methodology for application tracking and securities commitments
necessary for mortgage pipeline hedging management until these capabilities
were developed internally. In October 1993, the Bank reduced the consulting ar-
rangement to an advisory service, with hedging management being performed in-
ternally. The Bank will assess on a regular basis the continuation of this
pipeline tracking and valuation advisory service arrangement over in-house al-
ternatives. Management anticipates that secondary market practices and pipeline
interest rate risk management techniques will continue to be enhanced in 1994
to provide higher quality data transmission and more efficient product pricing
and delivery to secondary market investors.
The Bank offers ARM loans secured by owner and non-owner occupied single family
residences with a maximum amortized loan term of 30 years. ARM loans adjust
with the one-year U.S. Treasury index or COFI with a monthly interest rate ad-
justment commencing after an initial introduction period of up to six months.
Since the borrower's payment amount adjusts annually for the loans indexed to
COFI, if COFI increases these loans can negatively amortize if the monthly pay-
ment is not sufficient to pay in full the additional interest accruing on the
loan. Although single family ARM loans in the Bank's loan portfolio contain a
due-on-sale clause, by their terms they are transferable to a purchaser of the
property if the purchaser meets the Bank's credit standards. See "ARM Loans"
for a further discussion of ARMs and the Bank's asset/liability strategy.
Home Equity Loans
The Bank offers home equity credit lines. The maximum term of the credit lines
offered is 15 years. All of the credit lines provide for variable interest
rates based on a prime rate. These loans are generally underwritten using a
maximum loan-to-value ratio of between 70% and 75%. The total of undrawn credit
lines plus outstanding balances at March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993, 1992 and
1991 was $104 million, $108 million, $129 million and $138 million, respective-
ly.
The decline in undrawn credit lines plus outstanding balances was due to a
slowdown in new credit facility growth over the 1992 to 1993 period. New home
equity credit lines originated during 1993, 1992 and 1991 totaled approximately
$13.6 million, $26.9 million and $42.5 million, respectively. In 1993, new home
equity credit line originations declined 49% from 1992 levels as a function,
the Bank believes, of borrowers accessing equity in their homes through
refinancings of their mortgage loans, as well as lower homeowner equity, as
single family housing appraisals fell from higher values of prior years. In ad-
dition, in May 1993, management implemented a new $300 home equity application
fee which also contributed to the home equity volume reduction from 1992 lev-
els.
88
<PAGE>
Portfolio statistics
All presentations of the Bank's total loan portfolio include loans receivable
and loans held for sale unless stated otherwise. The presentations below do not
give effect to the Bulk Sales. For a description of the Bulk Sale Assets, see
"Restructuring and Recapitalization - Restructuring - Bulk Sales."
The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank's total loans re-
ceivable by type of security at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
(Dollars in thousands) OF OF OF OF OF
LOANS BY TYPE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
OF SECURITY: AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Residential loans:
Single family $ 792,054 20.80% $ 857,631 21.09% $1,083,152 23.47% $1,670,832 32.46% $1,705,569 38.00%
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 505,219 13.27% 526,826 12.96% 566,452 12.27% 583,474 11.33% 462,972 10.32%
5 to 36 units 1,795,374 47.16% 1,880,589 46.25% 1,991,089 43.14% 1,847,215 35.89% 1,317,346 29.35%
37 units and over 406,330 10.67% 444,576 10.93% 572,285 12.40% 610,763 11.86% 543,403 12.11%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
Total multifamily 2,706,923 71.10% 2,851,991 70.14% 3,129,826 67.81% 3,041,452 59.08% 2,323,721 51.78%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
Total residential
loans 3,498,977 91.90% 3,709,622 91.23% 4,212,978 91.28% 4,712,284 91.54% 4,029,290 89.78%
Other real estate
loans:
Commercial and
Industrial 295,761 7.77% 343,270 8.44% 385,960 8.36% 417,299 8.11% 440,951 9.83%
Land and land
improvements 3,736 0.10% 5,353 0.13% 9,069 0.19% 9,123 0.18% 7,210 0.16%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
Total other real
estate loans 299,497 7.87% 348,623 8.57% 395,029 8.55% 426,422 8.29% 448,161 9.99%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
Gross mortgage loans 3,798,474 99.77% 4,058,245 99.80% 4,608,007 99.83% 5,138,706 99.83% 4,477,451 99.77%
Loans secured by
savings accounts and
other non-real estate
loans 8,758 0.23% 8,038 0.20% 7,781 0.17% 8,748 0.17% 10,343 0.23%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
Gross loans receivable 3,807,232 100.00% 4,066,283 100.00% 4,615,788 100.00% 5,147,454 100.00% 4,487,794 100.00%
---------- ======= ---------- ======= ---------- ======= ---------- ======= ---------- =======
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds - 301 2,706 27,911 38,073
Unearned discounts 210 104 120 101 1,280
Deferred loan fees 11,139 11,152 12,131 10,621 3,906
Allowance for
estimated losses 83,832 64,277 52,374 16,552 7,336
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
95,181 75,834 67,331 55,185 50,595
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total loans receivable $3,712,051 $3,990,449 $4,548,457 $5,092,269 $4,437,199
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
See also "Unaudited Proforma Consolidated Financial Information."
The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank's loans held for
sale, which are included in the table above, by type of security at the dates
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF OF OF OF OF
(Dollars in thousands) TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
LOANS BY TYPE OF SECURITY: AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
-------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Residential loans:
Single family $239,371 65.10% $25,043 94.57% $37,497 100.00% $199,500 100.00% - -%
Multifamily 2 to 4 units 128,317 34.90% 1,439 5.43% - - - - - -%
-------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------ -------
Total loans held for sale $367,688 100.0% $26,482 100.00% $37,497 100.00% $199,500 100.00% $ - -%
======== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== ======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
89
<PAGE>
The following table presents the Bank's gross mortgage loans by type and loca-
tion as of December 31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMERCIAL AND
MULTIFAMILY INDUSTRIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS HOME HOTEL/ OTHER
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER EQUITY(1) MOTEL C & I TOTAL
-------- -------- ---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
California:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles $379,688 $178,016 $1,328,497 $281,714 $39,018 $20,740 $119,547 $2,347,220
Orange 137,398 199,942 185,262 50,657 12,893 26,742 58,309 671,203
San Diego 24,235 18,251 93,927 16,220 210 1,409 8,158 162,410
San Bernardino 18,050 31,471 43,194 24,173 1,476 - 4,639 123,003
Riverside 24,590 17,287 29,187 10,832 978 - 18,793 101,667
Ventura 24,144 8,693 30,398 2,546 921 2,593 1,211 70,506
Other 25,668 12,949 25,508 7,573 87 2,655 5,297 79,737
-------- -------- ---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ----------
633,773 466,609 1,735,973 393,715 55,583 54,139 215,954 3,555,746
Northern California
Counties:
Santa Clara 56,769 25,506 39,612 147 530 - 2,252 124,816
Other 45,289 11,818 19,789 5,197 233 2,251 16,170 100,747
-------- -------- ---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ----------
Total California 735,831 503,933 1,795,374 399,059 56,346 56,390 234,376 3,781,309
-------- -------- ---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ----------
Hawaii 255 - - - - - - 255
Arizona 73 - - 1,554 - - 4,708 6,335
Washington 325 - - 2,282 - - 543 3,150
Oregon - - - 3,435 - - 254 3,689
Maryland - - - - - 2,713 - 2,713
Colorado 21 - - - - 513 - 534
Texas 410 - - - - - - 410
New York 59 - - - - - - 59
Nevada 20 - - - - - - 20
-------- -------- ---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ----------
Total out-of-state 1,163 - - 7,271 - 3,226 5,505 17,165
-------- -------- ---------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ----------
Gross mortgage loans $736,994 $503,933 $1,795,374 $406,330 $56,346 $59,616 $239,881 $3,798,474
======== ======== ========== ======== ========= ======= ======== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) Includes home equity loans of $55,060 and $1,298 on single family and mul-
tifamily (2 to 4 units) properties, respectively. Therefore, including the
home equity loans, loans on single family and multifamily (2 to 4 units)
properties total $792,054 and $505,219, respectively.
The following table sets forth the types of loans by repricing attribute, held
by the Bank at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF OF OF OF OF
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Adjustable rate loans $3,649,714 95.86% $3,924,093 96.50% $4,447,838 96.36% $4,562,332 88.61% $4,069,508 90.68%
Fixed rate loans 157,518 4.14% 142,190 3.50% 167,950 3.64% 585,122 11.39% 418,286 9.32%
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ---------- -------
Gross loans receivable 3,807,232 100.00% 4,066,283 100.00% 4,615,788 100.00% 5,147,454 100.00% 4,487,794 100.00%
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds - 301 2,706 27,911 38,073
Unearned discounts 210 104 120 101 1,280
Deferred loan fees 11,139 11,152 12,131 10,621 3,906
Allowance for estimated
losses 83,832 64,277 52,374 16,552 7,336
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
95,181 75,834 67,331 55,185 50,595
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Loans receivable, net $3,712,051 $3,990,449 $4,548,457 $5,092,269 $4,437,199
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
90
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth by contractual maturity and interest rate, the
Bank's fixed rate and adjustable rate real estate loan portfolio at December
31, 1993. The table does not consider the prepayment experience of the loan
portfolio when scheduling the maturities of loans.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 1993
SUBTOTAL
MATURITIES
TOTAL GREATER MATURES IN
LOAN MATURES THAN ONE 1997- 1999- 2004- AFTER
RECEIVABLE IN 1994 YEAR 1995 1996 1998 2003 2008 2008
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------ ------- -------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Adjustable rate loans:
Under 5.00% $ 22,572 $ - $ 22,572 $ - $ - $ - $ 90 $ 560 $ 21,922
5.00%-6.99% 3,086,684 - 3,086,684 1,404 486 11,585 187,424 505,770 2,380,015
7.00%-8.99% 385,295 7,380 377,915 4,897 5,184 9,506 67,539 162,752 128,037
9.00%-10.99% 146,214 21,333 124,881 3,435 186 300 82,744 22,870 15,346
11.00%-12.99% 8,413 970 7,443 5,212 - - - 587 1,644
Over 13.00% 536 - 536 - - - 536 - -
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------ ------- -------- -------- ----------
Total adjustable rate
loans 3,649,714 $29,683 $3,620,031 $14,948 $5,856 $21,391 $338,333 $692,539 $2,546,964
---------- ======= ========== ======= ====== ======= ======== ======== ==========
Fixed rate loans:
Under 5.00% - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
5.00%-6.99% 32,844 7,989 24,855 96 203 5,549 791 5,500 12,716
7.00%-8.99% 56,323 1 56,322 781 695 3,060 9,951 8,177 33,658
9.00%-10.99% 52,881 39 52,842 249 1,006 2,767 2,641 27,901 18,278
11.00%-12.99% 11,198 4,653 6,545 862 717 - 115 418 4,433
Over 13.00% 4,272 1,924 2,348 - - 502 33 120 1,693
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------ ------- -------- -------- ----------
Total fixed rate loans 157,518 $14,606 $ 142,912 $ 1,988 $2,621 $11,878 $ 13,531 $ 42,116 $ 70,778
---------- ======= ========== ======= ====== ======= ======== ======== ==========
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds -
Unearned discounts 210
Deferred loan fees 11,139
Allowance for estimated
losses 83,832
----------
95,181
----------
Loans receivable, net $3,712,051
==========
</TABLE>
91
<PAGE>
The following table details the activity in the Bank's loan portfolio for the
periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Principal balance at
beginning period $3,712,051 $3,990,449 $4,548,457 $5,092,269 $4,437,199 $4,058,886
Real estate loans
originated:
Conventional:
Single family 87,061 271,316 261,563 186,320 248,349 248,932
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 15,097 42,931 29,931 63,146 179,515 121,648
5 to 36 units 28,626 89,935 121,940 239,165 640,621 288,549
37 units and over 5,307 12,887 19,588 15,785 104,864 115,376
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total multifamily 49,030 145,753 171,459 318,096 925,000 525,573
Commercial and
industrial 280 1,335 993 1,910 16,390 70,659
Construction - - - - 21,091 52,415
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total real estate
loans originated(1) 136,371 418,404 434,015 506,326 1,210,830 897,579
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Real estate loans
purchased:
Single family - - - 195,157 555
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units - - - - -
5 to 36 units 270 3,741 241 - 500 -
37 units and over 500 - 1,434 1,080 473 -
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total multifamily 770 3,741 1,675 1,080 973 -
Commercial and
industrial - 210 - - 62 -
Construction - - - - - -
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total real estate
loans purchased 770 3,951 1,675 1,080 196,192 555
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total real estate
loans funded 137,141 422,355 435,690 507,406 1,407,022 898,134
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Payments, refinances,
transfers to REO (80,125) (575,348) (672,996) (528,353) (507,942) (484,738)
Increase (decrease) in
non-real estate loans (858) 720 257 (962) (465) 855
(Increase) decrease in
reserves for loan
losses (7,536) (19,555) (11,903) (35,822) (9,216) (4,791)
Other increases
(decrease) in total
loans, net (2,917) 8,433 9,656 32,405 16,702 (19,114)
(Increase) decrease -
market value of loans
held for sale (1,050) - - - - -
Loans sold or
securitized:
Whole loans(2) (207,115) (115,003) (318,712) (486,413) (239,260) (1,824)
Participations - - - (32,073) (11,771) (10,209)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total loans sold or
securitized (207,115) (115,003) (318,712) (518,486) (251,031) (12,033)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net increase (decrease)
in loans receivable (162,460) (278,398) (558,008) (543,812) 655,070 378,313
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Principal balance at end
of period $3,549,591 $3,712,051 $3,990,449 $4,548,457 $5,092,269 $4,437,199
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Loans serviced for
others $1,047,265 $ 888,362 $ 982,698 $ 925,368 $ 676,101 $ 505,297
</TABLE>
(1) Includes loans originated to finance sales of REO of $51.6 million, $11.2
million and $1.6 million, for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and
1991, respectively. In 1990 and 1989 loans originated to finance sales of
REO were insignificant.
(2) Net of repurchases.
92
<PAGE>
Declines in total real estate loans originated in 1993 and 1992 were due
primarily to the curtailment of multifamily origination during the
reorganization of the Mortgage Banking Group and the imposition of more
stringent multifamily loan underwriting criteria. Declines in loan originations
in 1991 were due primarily to the Bank's decision to reduce assets to
strengthen its capital ratios.
Sale of Loans
Over the past several years, the Bank has sold most of its current production
of fixed rate single family residential loans in the secondary mortgage market
and has retained its ARM production. Loan sales totaled approximately $208.0
million in the first quarter of 1994, while loan sales totaled approximately
$138.4 million, $204.4 million and $282.7 million for the years ended December
31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. In addition, sales of mortgage-backed
securities totaled $93.6 million in the first quarter of 1994 and $522.1 mil-
lion, $0 and $273.0 million, respectively, in the prior three years. Fidelity
is an approved originator and servicer for the Federal National Mortgage Asso-
ciation (the "FNMA"), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (the "FHLMC"),
the Federal Housing Administration (the "FHA") and the Veterans Administration
(the "VA"). If Fidelity's single family lending volumes increase, sales of
loans in the secondary mortgage market should also increase.
During 1993, the Bank approved a policy of more active management of its loans
and investment portfolio with a view toward disposition of loans with unfavor-
able risk/return profiles and to allow more asset/liability management and as-
set size flexibility to facilitate further downsizing of the Bank. To this end,
the Bank designated $321 million of certain adjustable rate mortgage loans
meeting specific criteria as held for sale as of December 31, 1993, of which
$155 million were sold in the first quarter of 1994.
In connection with loan sales, Fidelity is required to make representations and
warranties with respect to the loans and their underwriting criteria. These
representations and warranties create a contingent liability to repurchase the
loans to the extent they are subsequently found to be untrue.
See "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Restructuring - Bulk Sales."
ARM Loans
To assist in reducing the sensitivity of its earnings to interest rate fluctua-
tions, Fidelity has emphasized the origination of ARMs for its portfolio. ARMs
help to improve the matching of interest rate repricing between Fidelity's as-
set and liability portfolios. ARMs reduce the interest rate risk inherent in a
portfolio of long-term mortgages by repricing each individual asset at regular
intervals over the life of the asset. The initial period before the first ad-
justment varies between one month and five years. ARM loans represented 52% of
all loans funded in 1993 and 96% of the total loan portfolio at December 31,
1993. ARM loans represented 96.1% of the total loan portfolio at March 31,
1994. Fidelity's ARMs generally bear an interest rate which periodically ad-
justs at a stated margin (the "contractual spread") above COFI, which is the
index which most closely matches Fidelity's liability base. When the borrower's
payment is not sufficient to cover the computed interest amount, negative amor-
tization occurs and the difference then increases the principal balance of the
loan. The risk of different asset and liability repricing can be reduced by di-
versifying the ARM portfolio. Other ARMs originated are generally indexed to
U.S. Treasury indices, which more closely match the repricing speed of depos-
its, but are more volatile than a COFI index.
ARMs may have greater vulnerability to default than fixed rate loans during
times of increasing interest rates due to the potential for substantial in-
crease in the amount of a borrower's payments or, to the extent payments do not
increase, erosion of a borrower's equity in the underlying property. Risks of
default are reduced by caps on both the maximum interest that can be charged
and the amount by which a borrower's payments can be periodically increased.
However, during periods of significant interest rate increases, interest rate
caps can adversely affect interest rate margins and payment caps can increase
borrower exposure to negative amortization, unless the loan contains a prohibi-
tion on negative amortization. Fidelity uses a combination of interest rate
caps and payment caps to reduce risk of default. At December 31, 1993, the to-
tal negative amortization included in the loan portfolio was $0.7 million com-
pared to $3.7 million at December 31, 1992.
93
<PAGE>
During periods of declining interest rates, ARMs with high interest rate caps
relative to market are vulnerable to prepayment as borrowers refinance into
ARMs with lower caps or into fixed rate loans. Fidelity has also attempted to
minimize the risk of default associated with all ARMs by using the COFI (a rel-
atively stable index) for adjustment, thereby limiting interest rate volatility
over short periods, and utilizing loan-to-value ratios generally not in excess
of 80% unless private mortgage insurance is obtained. During periods of declin-
ing interest rates, ARMs with negative amortization potential will experience
accelerated amortization, thereby offsetting, in whole or in part, previously
incurred negative amortization, if any, or reducing the principal balance ahead
of the original schedule.
Most of Fidelity's ARMs provide for a lifetime interest rate cap (currently
ranging from 1.875% to 6.250% above the initial rate). A limited number of
Fidelity's ARMs also provide for an annual interest rate cap. In addition, for
competitive reasons, ARMs are often offered at an initial reduced interest rate
(the "introductory rate") for a period of time (one, three, or six months).
Fidelity's ARMs are underwritten for credit purposes based on the pro forma
payment which would be required at the fully-indexed rate or at the time of the
first interest rate adjustment, depending on the type of property. For informa-
tion regarding certain litigation relating to ARMs, see "Legal Proceedings."
Fidelity currently offers primarily three types of ARMs. One type has a life-
time interest rate cap and payment cap on the amount by which monthly payments
can increase from one annual or semiannual payment adjustment to the next; an-
other type provides for a lifetime interest rate cap but includes payment ad-
justments concurrent with interest rate adjustments without a cap on the pay-
ment increase; and the last type provides for an initial five-year fixed rate
of interest after which it reverts to the type of ARM first described above.
CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
Appraisal and Underwriting Standards
All properties taken as collateral are appraised utilizing either an outside
appraiser or a Fidelity staff appraiser. Fidelity requires that loans secured
by real estate be approved at various levels of management, depending upon the
size of the loan. Until 1991, Fidelity had a low delinquency rate on all of its
single family and multifamily loans as well as its commercial properties lo-
cated in California. However, with worsening economic conditions and declines
in the real estate values in Southern California, delinquency rates have been
steadily increasing. Fidelity has reassessed its underwriting practices and, in
light of current conditions, has taken steps to increase qualifying ratios in-
cluding debt service coverage minimums and loan-to-value maximums.
During the underwriting process for single family loans, Fidelity obtains in-
formation regarding the applicant's income, financial condition, employment and
credit history to determine the applicant's ability to service the debt obliga-
tions. Fidelity underwrites loans pursuant to internal underwriting criteria as
well as to the requirements of the secondary market for such loans or special
investor needs. Increasing third party generation of single family loans will
require Fidelity to maintain strict underwriting and quality control standards.
Fidelity's underwriting standards for multifamily and commercial real estate
lending require the underwriter to review an applicant's experience in owning
and operating such type of income-producing property to determine if the appli-
cant is qualified to manage such property. At the time of origination, Fidelity
reviews the borrower's financial resources, credit history and income-producing
capacity, verifies employment, reviews an appraisal of the security property,
analyzes the anticipated occupancy, operating expenses and cash flow of income-
producing properties, and performs other underwriting procedures. In accordance
with its underwriting guidelines Fidelity generally requires a minimum debt
coverage ratio (net operating income divided by debt service payment) of from
112% to 130%, depending on the rated quality of the property, whether the loan
involves the arms-length market sale of the property or is a refinancing and if
it is a refinancing whether there is "cash out" or "no cash out." The debt
service coverage ratio is calculated on actual occupancy figures typically
utilizing a 10% vacancy factor and using a payment which is the greater of a
fully indexed rate, start rate or (typically higher) qualifying rate. The Bank
also limits its loans to a maximum of 50% to 75% of the appraised value of the
property, again depending on the rated quality of the property and other cir-
cumstances outlined above with respect to debt service coverage.
94
<PAGE>
Loan Portfolio Risk Elements
Fidelity originates loans with the expectation that borrowers will honor their
repayment obligations. In an attempt to reduce credit risk, Fidelity maintained
the underwriting criteria described above. As is the case with other lenders,
however, some of Fidelity's borrowers have or will become unable or unwilling
to pay interest or principal when due. The reasons for such defaults include,
without limitation, (a) adverse conditions in the regional or national economy;
(b) unemployment; (c) an oversupply of apartments for lease; (d) an increase in
vacancies; (e) a decline in real estate values; (f) declines in rents; and (g)
loss of equity. If the borrower is unable to meet his obligation but is willing
to make an additional financial commitment to the property securing the loan,
Fidelity may restructure the loan to more closely match the reduced cash flow
and value of the collateral. In other circumstances, Fidelity commences pro-
ceedings to foreclose upon the property securing the loan. Such proceedings may
be delayed by litigation or bankruptcy initiated by the borrower. Fidelity's
risk of loss relates both to the frequency of such defaults and to the severity
of loss, namely, the excess, if any, of the outstanding principal balance of
the loan plus accrued interest over the amount realized upon ultimate disposi-
tion of the collateral. In rare instances, Fidelity may be able to recover all
or some of the loss it incurs from other assets of the borrower. Fidelity also
is exposed to loss if the value of the collateral declines between the time of
foreclosure and the time of resale. Fidelity is also exposed to loss to the ex-
tent that it is required to invest significant funds to foreclose on and sell
its collateral, which may include rehabilitating dilapidated or distressed col-
lateral.
LOAN MONITORING
Fidelity has established a monitoring system for its loan portfolio to attempt
to identify potential problem loans. All loans are also monitored by the Rela-
tionship Management Group, the Internal Asset Review Group and the Loan Servic-
ing Group, which administers the loan portfolio. The Relationship Management
Group regularly updates all loan files and actively maintains contact with loan
borrowers with exposures of over $5 million. This program includes updating
rent rolls and cash flow operating statements and making site visits. In addi-
tion to analyzing nonproblem assets, the Internal Asset Review Group regularly
analyzes problem assets. During 1993, the group reviewed 100 percent of the
classified and criticized assets at least semi-annually, with more frequent re-
view for more seriously impaired assets. As a result of the investments made in
its systems, Fidelity will be able to update its loan files on all classified
and criticized assets each quarter, beginning with the first quarter of 1994.
Loans that are currently performing but have met certain criteria requiring
further scrutiny are placed on a "watch list". These criteria include, but are
not limited to, a large outstanding balance, collateral performing in an inade-
quate manner, origination for the purpose of facilitating the sale of real es-
tate owned by Fidelity, and other high risk characteristics identified through
the internal asset review process that warrant further analysis. Fidelity's Re-
lationship Management Group actively gathers updated operating information on
large multifamily loans.
95
<PAGE>
The following table details Fidelity's net loans which are 30 to 89 days delin-
quent at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
LOANS 60 TO 89 DAYS
CONTRACTUALLY
DELINQUENT:
Single family $ 2,497 $ 3,665 $ 3,370 $ 824 $ 1,532
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 1,707 1,180 1,841 - 1
5 to 36 units 12,770 9,241 7,811 - -
37 units and over 5,035 1,223 - - -
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total multifamily 19,512 11,644 9,652 - 1
Commercial and indus-
trial 1,723 - 7,869 3,612 719
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total $23,732 $15,309 $20,891 $4,436 $ 2,252
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
LOANS 30 TO 59 DAYS CONTRACTUALLY
DELINQUENT:
Single family $ 7,480 $ 7,939 $ 6,627 $3,063 $ 2,556
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 3,599 1,432 416 94 190
5 to 36 units 16,948 15,927 6,515 1,587 415
37 units and over 4,114 5,623 19,453 - 2,783
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total multifamily 24,661 22,982 26,384 1,681 3,388
Commercial and indus-
trial 2,048 1,807 3,040 139 4,409
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total $34,189 $32,728 $36,051 $4,883 $10,353
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
See also "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information."
The following table presents net delinquent loans at December 31, 1993, includ-
ing those detailed above (30 to 89 days delinquent) as well as those 90 days or
more delinquent:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMERCIAL AND
MULTIFAMILY INDUSTRIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER CONSTRUCTION OTHER TOTAL
--------- --------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
CALIFORNIA:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles $14,011 $ 5,224 $49,876 $11,442 $1,483 $ 6,079 $ 88,115
Orange 3,576 4,559 5,115 - - 1,495 14,745
San Bernardino 419 8,301 2,335 - - - 11,055
Riverside 754 940 1,896 - - - 3,590
San Diego 814 1,248 3,114 3,473 - - 8,649
Ventura 628 225 546 - - - 1,399
Other 717 238 - - - 682 1,637
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- ---------
20,919 20,735 62,882 14,915 1,483 8,256 129,190
Northern California
Counties:
Santa Clara 807 224 1,309 - - 651 2,991
Sacramento - - - - - 4,416 4,416
Other 906 - 273 - - - 1,179
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
1,713 224 1,582 - - 5,067 8,586
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
Total California 22,632 20,959 64,464 14,915 1,483 13,323 137,776
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
Arizona 5 - - - - - 5
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------
$22,637 $20,959 $64,464 $14,915 $1,483 $13,323 $137,781
========= ========= ========= ========= ========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
96
<PAGE>
Nonaccrual Loans
The Bank generally places a loan on nonaccrual status whenever the payment of
interest is 90 or more days delinquent, or earlier if a loan exhibits materi-
ally deficient characteristics. At December 31, 1993, $13.6 million of loans
were less than 90 days delinquent but had been placed on nonaccrual status.
Loans on nonaccrual status are resolved by the borrower bringing the loan cur-
rent, by the Bank and the borrower agreeing to modify the terms of the loan or
by foreclosure upon the collateral securing the loan. See "Restructured Loans"
and "Foreclosure Policies."
The following table presents Fidelity's net nonaccrual loans by type of collat-
eral at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
PROPERTY TYPE:
Single family $12,661 $ 14,064 $ 8,100 $ 3,631 $ 1,543
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 15,652 6,372 1,256 628 1,000
5 to 36 units 34,745 37,501 12,620 376 218
37 units and over 18,112 35,357 26,123 19,629 2,325
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total multifamily 68,509 79,230 39,999 20,633 3,543
Commercial and
industrial 12,305 18,747 20,883 5,897 7,001
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total nonaccrual
loans(1) $93,475 $112,041 $68,982 $30,161 $12,087
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
(1) Includes loans over 90 days contractually delinquent and other nonaccrual
loans.
It is the Bank's policy to reserve all earned but unpaid interest on loans
placed on nonaccrual status. The reduction in income related to nonaccrual
loans upon which interest was not paid was $8.7 million, $13.6 million, and
$7.6 million in 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
The following table presents net nonaccrual loans by property type and location
at December 31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMERCIAL AND
MULTIFAMILY INDUSTRIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER CONSTRUCTION OTHER TOTAL
--------- --------- --------- --------- ------------ --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
CALIFORNIA:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles $ 7,654 $ 3,780 $28,594 $18,112 $1,344 $ 4,909 $64,393
Orange 1,694 2,253 2,015 - - 303 6,265
San Bernardino 83 7,766 1,284 - - - 9,133
Riverside 362 766 687 - - - 1,815
San Diego 606 638 1,346 - - - 2,590
Ventura 398 225 546 - - - 1,169
Other 706 - - - - 682 1,388
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- ---------
11,503 15,428 34,472 18,112 1,344 5,894 86,753
Northern California
Counties:
Santa Clara 807 224 - - - 651 1,682
Sacramento - - - - - 4,416 4,416
Other 346 - 273 - - - 619
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- ---------
1,153 224 273 - - 5,067 6,717
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- ---------
Total California 12,656 15,652 34,745 18,112 1,344 10,961 93,470
Arizona 5 - - - - - 5
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- ---------
Total nonaccrual loans $12,661 $15,652 $34,745 $18,112 $1,344 $10,961 $93,475
========= ========= ========= ========= =========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
97
<PAGE>
Restructured Loans
The Bank has modified the terms of a number of its loans. In some cases, the
modifications have taken the form of "early recasts" in which the amortizing
payments are revised (or recalculated) earlier than scheduled to reflect cur-
rent lower interest rates. In other cases, the Bank has agreed to accept inter-
est only payments for a limited time at current interest rates. In still other
cases, the Bank has reduced the loan balance in exchange for a paydown of the
loan or otherwise modified loans at terms that are less favorable to the Bank
than the current market. These loans have interest rates that may be less than
current market rates or may contain other concessions. Modified loans are cate-
gorized as TDRs by the Bank when the modification contains concessions to the
borrower that the Bank would not otherwise consider except for the borrower's
poor financial condition.
The following table presents TDRs by property type at December 31, 1993 and De-
cember 31, 1992:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
PROPERTY TYPE:
Single family $ 633 $ 3,160
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 3,171 4,065
5 to 36 units 13,648 20,404
37 units and over 11,090 54,108
--------- ---------
Total multifamily 27,909 78,577
Commercial and industrial - 5,567
Land 171 -
--------- ---------
Total TDRs $28,713 $87,304
========= =========
</TABLE>
Of the total $87.3 million of TDRs at December 31, 1992, during 1993, the terms
of the modification expired on $39.8 million which are performing in accordance
with their original terms (of which $19.6 million are classified as Substan-
dard, $6.2 million are categorized as Special Mention and $14.0 million are
Pass assets), $20.4 million became nonperforming loans, $9.8 million defaulted
and were foreclosed, $3.5 million became ISF, $0.5 million was paid, and $13.3
million continued to be categorized as TDRs at December 31, 1993.
The following table presents TDRs at December 31, 1993, by property type and
location:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------
MULTIFAMILY
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER LAND TOTAL
-------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
CALIFORNIA:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles $633 $1,222 $ 7,122 $ 1,872 $ 95 $10,944
Orange - 323 3,573 3,997 - 7,893
San Bernardino - 177 2,337 1,786 76 4,376
Riverside - 1,098 616 - - 1,714
Other - 351 - - - 351
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total California 633 3,171 13,648 7,655 171 25,278
Oregon - - - 3,435 - 3,435
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total TDRs $633 $3,171 $13,648 $11,090 $171 $28,713
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
98
<PAGE>
The following table presents the loan balances of the TDRs at the dates indi-
cated by the type of modification:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992
PERCENT OF PERCENT OF
AMOUNT RESTRUCTURINGS AMOUNT RESTRUCTURINGS
------ -------------- ------ --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in millions)
Loans Modified By:
Early recast of scheduled payments $12.0 41.9% $29.3 33.6%
Interest only payments 8.6 29.8% 28.0 32.1%
Deferral of one or more payments 1.3 4.5% 21.4 24.5%
Fixed rate reduced to market 3.4 12.0% 4.4 5.0%
Extension of maturity date 0.1 0.3% 3.8 4.4%
Reduction in rate to below market - - 0.4 0.4%
Principal forgiveness(1) 3.3 11.5% - -
------ -------------- ------ --------------
Total TDRs $28.7 100.0% $87.3 100.0%
====== ============== ====== ==============
</TABLE>
(1) $1.0 million in actual principal forgiveness in 1993 on $3.3 million of
outstanding loans.
During 1993, interest income of $8.3 million was recorded on TDRs, $0.1 mil-
lion less than would have been recorded had the loans performed according to
their original terms. In 1992, the amounts were $10.0 million and $0.3 mil-
lion, respectively. During 1991, $0.7 million of interest income was recorded
on TDRs, which consisted of one loan of $6.9 million at year-end 1991. The
modification of this loan did not result in any reduction of interest income
in 1991. The Bank did not have any TDRs at December 31, 1990 or 1989.
INTERNAL ASSET CLASSIFICATIONS
The OTS has promulgated a regulation and issued other regulatory guidance re-
quiring savings institutions to utilize an internal asset classification sys-
tem as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets for regula-
tory supervision purposes. The Bank has incorporated the OTS's internal asset
classifications as a part of its credit monitoring system. The Bank currently
designates its assets as Pass, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful, or
Loss. A brief description of these categories follows:
A Pass asset is considered of sufficient quality to preclude designation as
Special Mention or an adverse classification. Pass assets generally are
protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by
the value of the asset or underlying collateral.
An asset designated as Special Mention does not currently expose an insti-
tution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant an adverse classification.
However, it does possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses de-
serving management's close attention. If uncorrected, such weaknesses or
deficiencies may expose an institution to an increased risk of loss in the
future.
An asset classified as Substandard is inadequately protected by the current
net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged,
if any. Assets so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses.
They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured insti-
tution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Assets classified as Doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those
classified as Substandard. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions
and values, highly questionable or improbable. The Bank views the Doubtful
classification as a temporary category. The Bank will generally classify
assets as Doubtful when inadequate data is available or when such uncer-
tainty exists as to preclude a Substandard classification. Therefore, the
Bank will normally tend to have a minimal amount of assets classified in
this category.
99
<PAGE>
Assets classified as Loss are considered uncollectible and of such little
value that their continuance as assets without establishment of a specific
reserve is not warranted. A Loss classification does not mean that an asset
has absolutely no recovery or salvage value; rather it means that it is not
practical or desirable to defer establishing a specific allowance for a ba-
sically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be effected in the
future. The Bank will generally classify as Loss the portion of assets
identified as exceeding the asset's fair market value and a specific re-
serve is established for such excess.
A "classified asset" is one that has been designated a Substandard, Doubtful or
Loss. Classified assets do not include Special Mention or Pass assets. All of
the foregoing standards require the application of considerable subjective
judgments by the Bank.
The following table summarizes Fidelity's net classified assets at the dates
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming Assets:
Nonaccrual loans $ 93,475 $112,041 $ 68,982 $30,161 $12,087
REO(1) 142,146 122,364 55,743 18,307 8,625
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Total nonperforming assets 235,621 234,405 124,725 48,468 20,712
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Performing loans with increased
risk:
Single family 5,749 6,808 6,963 2,930 3,833
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 7,616 3,648 3,390 - -
5 to 36 units 56,485 38,589 22,757 990 -
Over 37 units 51,965 49,566 36,405 11,207 2,751
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Total multifamily 116,066 91,803 62,552 12,197 2,751
Commercial and industrial 3,905 9,831 19,584 16,773 6,640
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Total performing loans with in-
creased risk 125,720 108,442 89,099 31,900 13,224
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Other classified assets:
Real estate held for investment,
net 11,161 10,891 14,516 14,367 14,911
Investment in subsidiaries - - - 247 508
Other assets - - 63 91 660
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Total classified assets $372,502 $353,738 $228,403 $95,073 $50,015
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Nonperforming assets to total as-
sets 5.37% 4.99% 2.43% 0.85% 0.42%
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Classified assets to total assets 8.49% 7.53% 4.46% 1.67% 1.00%
======== ======== ======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
(1) For presentation purposes, NPAs include REO net of REO GVA.
See also "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information."
100
<PAGE>
The following tables present the quarterly data for the dates indicated of
Fidelity's net classified assets:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1993 JUNE 30, 1993 SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1993
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming assets:
Nonaccruing loans $126,349 $ 96,419 $ 88,412 $ 93,475
REO 145,349 157,466 151,574 142,146
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
Total nonperforming
assets 271,698 253,885 239,986 235,621
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
Performing loans with
increased risk 117,478 95,975 103,769 125,720
Other classified assets:
Real estate held for
investment 10,803 10,702 11,371 11,161
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
Total classified as-
sets $399,979 $360,562 $355,126 $372,502
============== ============= ================== =================
Nonperforming assets
to total assets 5.72% 5.61% 5.40% 5.37%
============== ============= ================== =================
Classified assets to
total assets 8.43% 7.97% 7.99% 8.49%
============== ============= ================== =================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1992 JUNE 30, 1992 SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 DECEMBER 31, 1992
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming assets:
Nonaccruing loans $116,774 $108,264 $118,832 $112,041
REO 60,814 81,547 117,421 122,364
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
Total nonperforming
assets 177,588 189,811 236,253 234,405
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
Performing loans with
increased risk 58,127 73,380 133,218 108,442
Other classified assets:
Real estate held for
investment 12,428 12,341 12,253 10,891
-------------- ------------- ------------------ -----------------
Total classified as-
sets $248,143 $275,532 $381,724 $353,738
============== ============= ================== =================
Nonperforming assets
to total assets 3.53% 3.94% 4.93% 4.99%
============== ============= ================== =================
Classified assets to
total assets 4.93% 5.71% 7.96% 7.53%
============== ============= ================== =================
</TABLE>
Prior to 1994, loans meeting certain criteria were accounted for as ISFs. These
substantially foreclosed assets were recorded at the lower of the loan's book
value or at the estimated fair value of the collateral at the date the loan was
determined to be in-substance foreclosed. These assets were reported as "real
estate owned" as if they were formally foreclosed real estate. The estimated
fair value was based on the net amount that the Bank could reasonably have ex-
pected to receive for the asset in a current sale between a willing buyer and a
willing seller, i.e., other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Inherent in
the estimated fair value of these properties were assumptions about the length
of time the Bank would have had to hold the property before disposition. The
holding costs through the expected date of sale and estimated disposition costs
were considered in the valuations. In the first quarter of 1994, the Bank im-
plemented SFAS 114. Loans that would have been considered ISF are included in
the loan category beginning in 1994.
See also "Pro Forma Impact of the Bulk Sales on Loans and Other Real Estate As-
sets."
101
<PAGE>
CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE
Credit losses are inherent in the business of originating and retaining real
estate loans. As previously discussed, the Bank, in an effort to identify and
mitigate the risk of credit losses in a timely manner, performs periodic re-
views of any asset that has been identified as having potential excess credit
risk. The Bank maintains specific departments with responsibility for resolving
problem loans and selling real estate acquired through foreclosure to facili-
tate this process. Valuation allowances for estimated potential future losses
are established on a specific and general basis for loans and real estate
owned. Specific reserves for individual assets are determined by the excess of
the recorded investment over the fair market value of the collateral or prop-
erty when it is probable that the asset has been impaired. General valuation
allowances are provided for losses inherent in the loan and real estate portfo-
lios which have yet to be specifically identified. The GVA is based upon a num-
ber of factors, including historical loss experience, composition of the loan
and real estate portfolios, loan delinquency experience patterns, loan classi-
fications, prevailing and forecasted economic conditions and management's judg-
ment. A more detailed discussion of the Bank's policies for determining valua-
tion allowances is presented in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Finan-
cial Condition and Results of Operations - Three Months Ended March 31, 1994
Compared with Three Months Ended December 31, 1993 and March 31, 1993 - Asset
Quality". See also "Real Estate Acquired in Settlement of Loans."
See also the discussion of the GVA under "Restructuring and Recapitalization."
The following table sets forth Fidelity's GVA and specific reserves by loan or
real estate portfolio as of March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------
LOANS REO TOTAL
------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
GVA $76,549 $ 8,524 $ 85,073
Specific reserves 14,819 11,941 26,760
------- ------- --------
$91,368 $20,465 $111,833
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
The following summarizes Fidelity's GVA to total loans and real estate owned
and GVA to NPAs for the period indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
--------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
GVA to total loans and REO (in-
cluding ISFs)(1) 2.26% 2.03% 1.82% 1.13% 0.32% 0.18%
========= ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
GVA to NPAs(2) 30.99% 32.79% 30.49% 41.99% 32.14% 38.38%
========= ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
(1) Loans and REO in this ratio are calculated prior to the reduction for loan
and REO GVA, but are net of specific reserves.
(2) NPAs in this ratio are calculated prior to the reduction for REO GVA.
102
<PAGE>
The following summarizes the activity in Fidelity's allowance for estimated
loan losses for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------
THREE
MONTHS
ENDED
MARCH 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
--------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning pe-
riod $83,832 $64,277 $52,374 $16,552 $ 7,336 $2,545
Provision for estimated
loan losses 15,600 65,100 51,180 49,843 11,039 8,359
Transfer to real estate
GVA - - (12,400) - - -
Charge-offs (9,781) (50,504) (27,350) (17,005) (1,841) (3,680)
Recoveries and other 1,717 4,959 473 2,984 18 112
--------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------
Balance at end of period $91,368 $83,832 $64,277 $52,374 $16,552 $7,336
========= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======
Charge-offs to average
loans outstanding 1.04% 1.28% 0.61% 0.36% 0.04% 0.09%
========= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - 1993 compared with 1992 and 1992 compared with 1991 - Asset Quali-
ty" for information with respect to Fidelity's loan and REO charge-offs by
property type and year of loan origination for the years ended December 31,
1993 and 1992.
FORECLOSURE POLICIES
The Bank typically initiates foreclosure proceedings between 30 and 90 days af-
ter a borrower defaults on a loan. The proceedings take at least four months
before the collateral for the loan can be sold at "foreclosure" auction, and
this period can be extended under certain circumstances, such as, if the bor-
rower files bankruptcy or if the Bank enters into negotiations with the bor-
rower to restructure the loan. In California, foreclosure proceedings almost
always take the form of a nonjudicial foreclosure, upon the completion of which
the lender is left without recourse against the borrower for any deficiency or
shortfall from the difference between the value of the collateral and the
amount of the loan, and in most cases the Bank ends up with title to the prop-
erty. In some cases, while the foreclosure proceedings are under way, the bor-
rower requests forbearance from collection efforts, more time to cure the de-
fault, or a restructuring of the loan. The Bank agrees to such a request if it
determines that the loan, as modified, is likely to result in a greater ulti-
mate recovery than taking title to the property. Among the factors the Bank
considers in granting the borrower a concession is the extent to which the bor-
rower pays down the loan, furnishes more collateral or makes a further invest-
ment in the property by way of repairs or refurbishment, and demonstrates an
awareness and ability to manage the property according to a reasonable operat-
ing plan.
103
<PAGE>
REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED IN SETTLEMENT OF LOANS
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans results when property
collateralizing a loan is foreclosed upon or otherwise acquired in satisfaction
of the loan and the Bank takes title to the property. This property owned by
the Bank is included in REO. The Bank experiences foreclosures as part of the
normal process of conducting its primary business activity, real estate lend-
ing. Certain loans are also included in REO when they exhibit characteristics
more closely associated with the risk of real estate ownership than with loans.
These loans are designated in-substance foreclosures if they meet the following
criteria: (a) the borrower currently has little or no equity at fair market
value in the underlying collateral; (b) the only source of repayment is the
property securing the loan; and (c) the borrower has abandoned the property or
will not be able to rebuild equity in the foreseeable future. Prior to 1994,
collateral that was categorized as ISF was reported in the same manner as prop-
erty that is owned by the Bank. ISFs and property owned by the Bank differ in
one key respect: the Bank can only sell or dispose of property it owns. As with
any loan, it must complete foreclosure of an ISF before it can sell the under-
lying collateral.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 114, beginning January 1, 1994, loans
that meet the criteria for ISF designation are no longer reported as REO, al-
though they will continue to be valued based on the fair value of the collat-
eral and will generally continue to be included in NPAs.
The following table presents Fidelity's net REO, including ISF, by property
type at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991 1990 1989
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
PROPERTY TYPE:
Single family $ 6,942 $ 7,014 $ 3,032 $ 1,202 $1,276
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 10,345 4,129 695 - -
5 to 36 units 41,177 32,535 8,674 253 253
37 units and over 47,565 40,924 15,040 1,518 1,606
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------
Total multifamily 99,087 77,588 24,409 1,771 1,859
Commercial and industrial 44,559 51,381 28,302 15,334 5,490
REO GVA (8,442) (13,619) - - -
-------- -------- ------- ------- ------
Total REO(1) $142,146 $122,364 $55,743 $18,307 $8,625
======== ======== ======= ======= ======
Total ISFs included above(2) $ 28,362 $ 47,324 $25,490 - -
======== ======== ======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
(1) Foreclosed real estate is shown net of first deed loans to others, where
applicable.
(2) The Company implemented SFAS No. 114 in January 1994 which effectively
eliminated the ISF designation.
See also "Pro Forma Impact of the Bulk Sales on Loans and Other Real Estate As-
sets."
104
<PAGE>
The following table presents the Bank's real estate acquired in settlement of
loans (ISF is excluded) by location and property type at December 31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MULTIFAMILY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS HOTEL/ OFFICE
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER MOTEL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OTHER TOTAL
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
California:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles $3,703 $ 5,895 $19,621 $21,638 $ 6,585 $1,603 $2,351 $2,200 $ 63,596
Orange 502 1,410 4,677 5,484 - 5,490 - 222 17,785
San Bernardino - 1,228 2,308 13,837 - - - 600 17,973
Riverside 326 1,069 2,794 - - - - 826 5,015
San Diego 830 211 250 1,249 1,885 - - - 4,425
Ventura 606 - - - - 363 - - 969
Other - 532 - - - - - - 532
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
5,967 10,345 29,650 42,208 8,470 7,456 2,351 3,848 110,295
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Northern California
Counties:
Santa Clara 209 - - - - 2,498 - - 2,707
Other 54 - - - - - - - 54
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
263 - - - - 2,498 - - 2,761
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Total California 6,230 10,345 29,650 42,208 8,470 9,954 2,351 3,848 113,056
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Hawaii 712 - - - - - - - 712
Florida - - - - 7,823 - - - 7,823
Washington - - - - - - - 635 635
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Total out-of-state 712 - - - 7,823 - - 635 9,170
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Total REO $6,942 $10,345 $29,650 $42,208 $16,293 $9,954 $2,351 $4,483 $122,226
====== ======= ======= ======== ======= ======== ============ ====== ========
The following table presents the Bank's ISFs by location and property type at
December 31, 1993:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MULTIFAMILY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS HOTEL/ OFFICE
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER MOTEL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OTHER TOTAL
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
(Dollars in thousands)
California:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles $- $- $ 9,078 $5,357 $ - $- $- $133 $14,568
Orange - - 2,155 - - - - - 2,155
San Diego - - 294 - - - - - 294
San Bernardino - - - - - - - 509 509
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Total California - - 11,527 5,357 - - - 642 17,526
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Hawaii - - - - 10,388 - - - 10,388
Pennsylvania - - - - 448 - - - 448
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Total out-of-state - - - - 10,836 - - - 10,836
------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------------ ------ --------
Total ISFs $- $- $11,527 $5,357 $10,836 $- $- $642 $28,362
====== ======= ======= ======== ======= ======== ============ ====== ========
</TABLE>
105
<PAGE>
In the current market, the Bank rarely sells REO for a price equal to or
greater than the loan balance, and the losses suffered are impacted by the mar-
ket factors discussed elsewhere herein. REO is recorded at acquisition at the
lower of the recorded investment in the subject loan or the fair market value
of the assets received. The fair market value of the assets received is based
upon a current appraisal adjusted for estimated carrying, rehabilitation and
selling costs. Income-producing properties acquired by the Bank through fore-
closure are managed by third party contract managers, under the supervision of
Bank personnel. During 1993 and 1992, the Bank's policy was generally to pro-
ceed promptly to market the properties acquired through foreclosure, and the
Bank often makes financing terms available to buyers of such properties. Gener-
ally, the Bank experiences higher losses on sale of REO properties for all
cash, as opposed to financing the sale, although when it finances the sale, the
Bank incurs the risk that the loan may not be repaid in full. During 1993, the
Bank sold 210 REO properties for net sales proceeds of $83.5 million, with a
gross book and net book value totaling $138.5 million and $89.8 million, re-
spectively. This compares to 43 properties sold in 1992 for net sales proceeds
of $25.6 million, with a gross book and net book value of $34.9 million and
$27.6 million, respectively.
The following table shows real estate sold by property type during the periods
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992
NO. OF NET BOOK VALUE NO. OF NET BOOK VALUE
PROPERTIES AT DATE OF SALE PROPERTIES AT DATE OF SALE
---------- --------------- ---------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Single family 61 $12,932 20 $ 3,546
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 21 4,248 6 529
5 to 36 units 109 53,496 9 6,386
37 units and over 14 17,919 4 11,773
---------- --------------- ---------- ---------------
Total multifamily 144 75,663 19 18,688
Commercial & industrial 5 1,227 4 5,401
---------- --------------- ---------- ---------------
210 $89,822 43 $27,635
========== =============== ========== ===============
</TABLE>
Direct costs of foreclosed real estate operations totaled $18.8 million, $3.6
million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
respectively. The large increase in 1993 over 1992 was due primarily to an in-
crease in the number of properties foreclosed in 1993 over 1992. During 1993,
the Bank foreclosed on 282 properties with a gross book value of $204.7 million
compared to 139 properties with a gross book value of $112.9 million, during
1992. The average number of REO properties held during 1993 was 205 compared to
117 during 1992. Property tax expense on foreclosed property for the year ended
1993 was $5.1 million (at the time of foreclosure, a typical property is delin-
quent for three property tax payments). Due to the deterioration in the real
estate market in Southern California, property tax assessments are generally
higher than the appraised value of REO properties at the time of foreclosure.
The Bank's policy is to appeal all property tax valuations on REO property at
the time of acquisition.
106
<PAGE>
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
As a matter of prudent business practice, Fidelity maintains assets that are
easily liquidated or otherwise saleable to meet unexpected funding require-
ments.
Fidelity also is required by federal regulations to maintain a minimum level of
liquid assets which may be invested in certain government and other specified
securities. See "Regulation and Supervision - Required Liquidity." Investment
decisions are made within guidelines approved by Fidelity's Board of Directors.
Such investments are managed in an effort to produce a yield consistent with
maintaining safety of principal and compliance with applicable regulations.
The Bank's securities portfolio consisted of the following at the dates indi-
cated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992 1991
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Federal Funds Sold $ 20,000 3.69% $ 60,000 3.00% $ - -% $ - -%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Investment securities:
Available for sale:
U.S. Government and
agency obligations 90,594 4.62% 87,385 4.59% - - - -
Other investments 5,007 5.07% 4,874 5.07% - - - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
95,601 4.64% 92,259 4.65% - - - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government
obligations - - - - 24,950 8.54% 32,916 8.55%
Commercial paper - - - - 29,986 3.92% 980 5.15%
Other Investments - - - - 12,401 4.65% - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
- - - - 67,337 5.77% 33,896 8.45%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total investment
securities 95,601 4.64% 92,259 4.65% 67,337 5.77% 33,896 8.45%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Mortgage-backed
securities:
Available for sale:
FHLMC 3,893 3.55% 34,184 5.13% - - - -
FNMA 4,413 4.36% 14,853 4.67% - - - -
Participation
Certificates 36,745 5.69% 38,223 5.87% - - - -
CMO 3,247 4.37% 3,848 4.39% - - - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
48,298 5.31% 91,108 5.33% - - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
Held to maturity:
FHLMC - - - - 102,476 5.89% 15,733 8.63%
GNMA - - - - 14,466 8.24% 16,941 8.17%
FNMA - - - - 113,442 6.54% - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
- - - - 230,384 6.36% 32,674 8.39%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total mortgage-backed
securities 48,298 5.31% 91,108 5.33% 230,384 6.36% 32,674 8.39%
-------- -------- -------- --------
FHLB and FRB stock 52,626 3.56% 52,151 3.20% 50,574 1.47% 49,245 6.16%
-------- -------- -------- --------
$216,525 4.44% $295,518 4.27% $348,295 5.54% $115,815 7.46%
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
107
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the maturity and weighted average yield of the
Bank's investment securities at March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MATURES IN
TOTAL 1994 1995 THROUGH 1998 1999 THROUGH 2003 2003 AND THEREAFTER
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD
(Dollars in thousands) -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Federal Funds Sold $ 20,000 3.69% $20,000 3.69% $ - -% $ - -% $ - -%
Investment securities
available for sale:
U.S. Government and
agency obligations 90,594 4.62% 389 3.44% 90,205 4.62% - - - -
Other investments 5,007 5.07% 1,177 3.91% 3,545 5.21% 285 6.19% - -
-------- ------- -------- -------- ----------
Total investment Securi-
ties 95,601 4.64% 1,566 3.79% 93,750 4.64% 285 6.19% - -
Mortgage-backed
securities available
for sale 48,298 5.31% - - 7,660 4.37% - - 40,638 5.49%
FHLB and FRB Stock 52,626 3.56% 52,626 3.56% - - - - - -
-------- ------- -------- -------- ----------
$216,525 4.44% $74,192 3.60% $101,410 4.62% $285 6.19% $40,638 5.49%
======== ======= ======== ======== ==========
</TABLE>
Interest income from the investment portfolio contributed 6.5%, 3.9% and 4.3%
of the Bank's total revenue not including the impact of real estate loss provi-
sions and direct costs of real estate operations, for the years ended December
31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
The Bank derives funds from deposits, FHLB Advances, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and other short-term and long-term borrowings. In ad-
dition, funds are generated from loan payments and payoffs as well as from the
sale of loans and investments.
108
<PAGE>
Deposits
The largest source of funds for the Bank is deposits. Customer deposits are in-
sured by the FDIC up to $100,000 per account. The Bank has several types of de-
posit accounts designed to attract both short-term and long-term deposits. The
following table sets forth the weighted average interest rates paid by the Bank
and the amounts of deposits held by the Bank at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------ -------------------------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
RATES AT AMOUNTS AT
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992 1991 1994 1993 1992 1991
--------- ---- ---- ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Checking - no minimum
term:
NOW 1.0% 1.0% 1.6% 3.0% $ 281,735 $ 263,192 $ 257,575 $ 204,454
Money market checking 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 3.8% 48,920 50,840 49,289 62,837
Noninterest bearing - - - - 66,144 52,936 31,632 14,091
Savings - no minimum
term:
Passbook 2.0% 2.0% 2.5% 4.0% 90,287 82,168 74,738 58,817
Money market savings 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 4.6% 270,786 280,495 429,708 415,636
Certificate accounts:
Original term:
Less than 3 months 2.1% 2.8% 3.0% 5.1% 36,611 118,697 108,399 99,525
3 months to 5 months 3.3% 3.4% 3.2% 5.3% 531,408 601,419 230,396 282,741
6 months to 11 months 2.8% 3.3% 3.4% 6.1% 735,373 740,741 1,009,970 1,691,551
12 months to 23 months 3.8% 4.2% 4.7% 6.4% 507,952 601,382 614,581 621,625
24 months to 59 months 5.1% 5.3% 6.6% 7.2% 252,925 228,194 325,764 287,752
60 months and over 6.9% 6.9% 7.1% 7.7% 349,165 348,600 327,596 146,832
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
3.4% 3.6% 4.0% 5.9% $3,171,306 $3,368,664 $3,459,648 $3,885,861
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
The following table provides additional deposit information by remaining matu-
rity at March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REMAINING MATURITY
OVER OVER OVER OVER
3 MONTHS 6 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 24 MONTHS
INDETERMINATE 3 MONTHS BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN OVER
MATURITY OR LESS 6 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 24 MONTHS 36 MONTHS 36 MONTHS TOTAL
------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Passbook, 2.00% at March
31, 1994 $ 90,287 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,287
Checking and money
market checking, 0.93%
at March 31, 1994 396,799 - - - - - - 396,799
Money market passbook,
2.38% at March 31, 1994 270,786 - - - - - - 270,786
Certificate Accounts:
Under 3.00% - 275,118 291,450 29,296 5,923 317 934 603,038
3.01 - 4.00% - 797,900 107,408 82,789 35,697 134 37 1,023,965
4.01 - 5.00% - 81,331 18,456 113,358 113,154 10,060 5,340 341,699
5.01 - 6.00% - 42,403 895 4,807 6,884 215 32,823 88,027
6.01 - 7.00% - 8,573 6,469 5,440 2,256 97,250 105,225 225,213
7.01 - 8.00% - 7,485 10,328 3,208 3,779 44,160 20,831 89,791
Over 8.01% - 9,943 4,223 3,221 11,369 153 12,792 41,701
------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Total deposits $757,872 $1,222,753 $439,229 $242,119 $179,062 $152,289 $177,982 $3,171,306
============= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========= ==========
</TABLE>
109
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more by
remaining maturity and weighted average rate at March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) PERCENT OF WEIGHTED
REMAINING TERMS OF MATURITY (IN MONTHS): AMOUNT TOTAL DEPOSITS AVERAGE RATE
--------- -------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Three or less $246,451 7.8% 3.59%
Other three to six 97,190 3.1% 3.20%
Over six to twelve 38,850 1.2% 4.14%
Over twelve 125,159 3.9% 6.05%
--------- -------------- ------------
$507,650 16.0% 4.16%
========= ============== ============
</TABLE>
Certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more accounted for $592.7 million and
represented 17.6% of all deposits at December 31, 1993; $549.5 million or 15.9%
of all deposits at December 31, 1992 and $628.5 million or 16.2% of all depos-
its at December 31, 1991. Fidelity intends to continue to use such certificates
of deposit as a source of funds to manage its liquidity. However, a significant
increase is not currently expected.
The distribution of certificate accounts by date of maturity is an important
indicator of the relative stability of a major source of lendable funds. Longer
term certificate accounts generally provide greater stability as a source of
lendable funds, but currently entail greater interest costs than passbook ac-
counts. The following table summarizes certificate accounts by maturity, as a
percentage of total deposits and weighted average rate at March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands)
CERTIFICATE ACCOUNTS PERCENT OF WEIGHTED
MATURING IN QUARTER ENDING: AMOUNT TOTAL DEPOSITS AVERAGE RATE
---------- -------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
June 30, 1994 $1,222,753 38.6% 3.51%
September 30, 1994 439,229 13.9% 2.93%
December 31, 1994 90,917 2.9% 4.14%
March 31, 1995 151,202 4.8% 3.69%
June 30, 1995 60,804 1.9% 4.62%
September 30, 1995 47,310 1.5% 4.54%
December 31, 1995 32,646 1.0% 4.65%
March 31, 1996 38,302 1.2% 4.26%
June 30, 1996 21,465 0.7% 6.83%
September 30, 1996 35,622 1.1% 6.97%
December 31, 1996 28,067 0.9% 6.68%
March 31, 1997 67,135 2.1% 6.49%
After March 31, 1997 177,982 5.5% 6.66%
---------- --------------
$2,413,434 76.1% 3.94%
========== ==============
Total Deposits $3,171,306
==========
</TABLE>
110
<PAGE>
The Bank also utilizes brokered deposits as a short-term means of funding.
These deposits are obtained or placed by or through a deposit broker and are
subject to certain regulatory limitations. Should the Bank become undercapital-
ized, it would be prohibited from accepting, renewing or rolling over deposits
obtained through a deposit broker. See "Regulation and Supervision--FDICIA
Prompt Corrective Action Requirements." The following table summarizes the
Bank's outstanding balance of brokered deposits at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------
%
OF TOTAL
AMOUNT DEPOSITS
------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, 1994 $38,258 1.21%
December 31, 1993 92,196 2.74%
December 31, 1992 12,850 0.37%
December 31, 1991 - -
</TABLE>
Borrowings
The Bank utilizes borrowings from the FHLB System ("FHLB Advances") as a source
of funds for operations. The FHLB System functions as a source of credit to
savings institutions which are members of a Federal Home Loan Bank. See "Regu-
lation and Supervision - Federal Home Loan Bank System." Fidelity may apply for
advances from the FHLB secured by the capital stock of the FHLB owned by Fidel-
ity and certain of Fidelity's mortgages and other assets (principally obliga-
tions issued or guaranteed by the United States Government or agencies there-
of). Advances can be requested for any business purpose in which Fidelity is
authorized to engage, except that advances with a term greater than 5 years can
be granted only for the purpose of providing funds for residential housing fi-
nance. In granting advances, the FHLB considers a member's creditworthiness and
other relevant factors. FHLB Advances to Fidelity totaled $326.4 million,
$581.4 million, and $325.0 million at December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respec-
tively. The decreased use of FHLB Advances in 1993 as a source of funds results
primarily from the use of commercial paper, which is less costly, as an alter-
nate source of funds. Fidelity's available FHLB line of credit is based primar-
ily on a portion of Fidelity's residential loan portfolio pledged for such pur-
pose, up to a maximum 25% of total assets. The FHLB of San Francisco notified
Fidelity on May 31, 1994, that the FHLB will require mandatory delivery of the
Bank's collateral supporting its advances if by June 30, 1994, Fidelity has not
entered into definitive agreements for disposition of problem assets and the
infusion of additional capital.
At March 31, 1994, and December 31, 1993, Fidelity's remaining available line
of credit was $227.1 million and $297.7 million, respectively, after deducting
outstanding advances and a $400.0 million backup letter of credit for outstand-
ing commercial paper, as described below.
The Bank also utilizes the capital markets to obtain funds for its lending op-
erations. This source has been used for long-term borrowings in the past and
can be utilized in the future. At March 31, 1994, the Bank had outstanding 8
1/2% mortgage-backed medium-term notes, Series A, due April 15, 1997 (the "1997
MTNs"). At December 31, 1993, the 1997 MTNs had a balance of $100 million. The
1997 MTNs are secured by mortgage loans and U.S. Treasury notes with a combined
principal balance of $255.7 million at December 31, 1993.
During 1992, the Bank started issuing commercial paper, backed by a $400 mil-
lion letter of credit from the FHLB of San Francisco to ensure a high quality
investment grade rating. The letter of credit commitment varies with the level
of commercial paper outstanding, and the FHLB line of credit for advances de-
scribed above increases or decreases accordingly. Commercial paper outstanding
totaled $254 million at March 31, 1994 and $304 million and $65 million at De-
cember 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively. All commercial paper outstanding at
March 31, 1994 matures within 120 days with an average interest rate of 3.47%.
111
<PAGE>
From time to time, Fidelity enters into reverse repurchase agreements by which
it sells securities with an agreement to repurchase the same securities at a
specific future date (overnight to 30 days). Fidelity deals only with dealers
perceived by management to be financially strong and who are recognized as pri-
mary dealers in U.S. Treasury securities by the FRB. There were no reverse re-
purchase agreements outstanding at March 31, 1994.
In May 1990, Fidelity issued the Subordinated Notes approved by the OTS as ad-
ditional regulatory risk-based capital. The Subordinated Notes were issued to
institutional investors in the amount of $60 million, with interest payable
semiannually at 11.68% per annum and are repayable in five equal annual in-
stallments commencing May 15, 1996. Citadel and the Bank have entered into the
Settlement Agreement with the four lenders pursuant to which, among other
things, simultaneously with the Closing, the Bank will redeem the $60 million
of Subordinated Notes at a redemption price equal to the unpaid principal
amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest (estimated to be approximately
$1.2 million assuming that the Closing occurs on July 15, 1994), plus the Re-
capitalization Fee. See "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Restructuring -
Redemption of Subordinated Debt."
The following table sets forth certain information as to the Bank's FHLB Ad-
vances, other borrowings and Subordinated Notes at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992 1991
--------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
FHLB Advances:
Fixed rate bonds $ 110,000 $110,000 $ 40,000 $ 20,000
Floating rate advances 232,700 216,400 541,400 305,000
--------- -------- -------- --------
342,700 326,400 581,400 325,000
Borrowings:
Mortgage-backed notes/bonds:
Fixed rate bonds - - 62,000 62,000
Fixed rate notes 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000
Floating rate bonds - - - 65,950
Floating rate notes - - - 200,000
--------- -------- -------- --------
100,000 100,000 262,000 527,950
Commercial paper 254,000 304,000 65,000 -
Securities sold under agreements to re-
purchase - 3,830 -
Other - - - 3,200
--------- -------- -------- --------
354,000 407,830 327,000 531,150
Subordinated notes 60,000 60,000 60,000 75,000
--------- -------- -------- --------
Total borrowings $756,700 $794,230 $968,400 $931,150
========= ======== ======== ========
Weighted average interest rate on all
borrowings 5.24% 5.12% 5.91% 7.47%
========= ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
For more information on the Bank's borrowings, see Notes 9 and 10 to the con-
solidated financial statements.
Loan Repayments and Loan Sales
Another important source of funds for the Bank is the repayment of loans it has
made and sales of loans. Receipts from loan repayments (scheduled and
unscheduled) and sales of loans, net of repurchases, were approximately $690
million, $878 million, and $926 million for the years ended December 31, 1993,
1992 and 1991, respectively. See "Mortgage Banking Group Operations."
112
<PAGE>
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on the Bank's
loans and investment securities and interest paid on its deposits and
borrowings. Net interest income is affected by the interest rate spread, which
is the difference between the rates earned on its interest-earning assets and
rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, as well as the relative amounts
of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-
earning assets exceed interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate
spread will generate net interest income. The Bank's average interest rate mar-
gin for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 was 2.26%, 2.66% and
2.53%, respectively. Excluding the writedown of core deposit intangibles of
$5.2 million, the average interest rate margin for the year ended December 31,
1993 would have been 2.38%.
The objective of interest rate risk management is to manage interest rate risk
in a prudent manner to maximize the net income of the Bank. Banks and savings
institutions are subject to interest rate risk when assets and liabilities ma-
ture or reprice at different times (duration risk), against different indices
(basis risk) or for different terms (yield curve risk). The decision to control
or accept interest rate risk can only be made with an understanding of the
probability of various scenarios occurring. Having liabilities that reprice
more quickly than assets is beneficial when interest rates fall, but may be
detrimental when interest rates rise.
Since 1985, the Bank has shifted its portfolio toward adjustable rate mortgage
loans that reprice more closely with its interest-bearing liabilities. ARM
loans comprised 96% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 1993, 1992 and
1991. The percentage of monthly adjustable ARMs to total loans was 74.7% at De-
cember 31, 1993 compared to 74.4% and 71.6% at December 31, 1992 and 1991, re-
spectively. Interest sensitive assets provide the Bank with a degree of long-
term protection from rising interest rates. At December 31, 1993, approximately
96% of Fidelity's total loan portfolio consisted of loans which mature or
reprice within one year, compared with approximately 95% at December 31, 1992
and approximately 97% at December 31, 1991. Fidelity has in recent periods ben-
efited from the fact that decreases in the interest rates accruing on
Fidelity's ARMs lagged the decreases in interest rates accruing on its depos-
its, primarily due to the lagging effects of the COFI, the index to which most
of Fidelity's ARMs reprice. Fidelity benefited in 1992 and 1991 from the fact
that decreases in its asset yield lagged decreases in its liability cost. Dur-
ing 1993, short and intermediate term rates to which most of Fidelity's liabil-
ities reprice, remained essentially constant. As COFI continued to decline, the
Bank's interest rate spread narrowed. If market rates fall, the Bank's spread
will initially improve. If market rates increase, the Bank's spread will dete-
riorate initially until a catch up in lag in the COFI index. See "ARM Loans."
The Bank took steps in 1993 to reduce the impact of its declining spread. These
steps include the decision not to replace expired interest rate cap agreements,
and the decision to enter into interest rate swap contracts. The Bank continues
to monitor and control its interest rate risk exposure within approved guide-
lines and in such a way as to avoid the need to hold extra capital because of
interest rate risk.
113
<PAGE>
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the Bank's total dol-
lar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the re-
sultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing li-
abilities and the resultant costs, expressed both in dollars and rates. The ta-
ble also sets forth the net interest income and the net earnings balance for
the periods indicated. Average balances are computed using an average of the
daily balances during the year. Certain reclassifications have been made to
prior periods to conform to the 1993 presentation.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 1992 1991
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
AVERAGE YIELD/ AVERAGE YIELD/ AVERAGE YIELD/
BALANCE INTEREST RATE BALANCE INTEREST RATE BALANCE INTEREST RATE
---------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning as-
sets:
Loans and mortgage-
backed Securities(1) $4,136,044 $280,762 6.79% $4,421,798 $361,177 8.17% $5,034,392 $503,021 9.99%
Investment securities
and cash equivalents 170,504 6,928 4.06% 197,873 8,799 4.45% 221,117 13,960 6.31%
Investment in FHLB
stock 51,210 1,640 3.20% 50,219 740 1.47% 49,891 3,071 6.16%
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total interest-earning
assets 4,357,758 289,330 6.64% 4,669,890 370,716 7.94% 5,305,400 520,052 9.80%
-------- -------- --------
Noninterest-earning as-
sets 212,211 170,812 219,958
---------- ---------- ----------
Total assets $4,569,969 $4,840,702 $5,525,358
========== ========== ==========
Interest-earning
liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand deposits 303,206 4,781 1.58% 282,572 6,959 2.46% 259,464 12,195 4.70%
Savings deposits 451,590 19,318 4.26% 497,070 24,964 5.01% 430,163 30,265 7.00%
Time deposits 2,499,076 107,622 4.31% 2,853,393 143,154 5.02% 3,330,847 236,316 7.09%
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total deposits 3,253,872 131,721 4.05% 3,633,035 175,077 4.82% 4,020,474 278,776 6.93%
Borrowings 1,049,291 56,773 5.41% 916,836 65,046 7.09% 1,188,759 99,738 8.39%
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total interest-bearing
liabilities 4,303,163 188,494 4.38% 4,549,871 240,123 5.28% 5,209,233 378,514 7.27%
-------- -------- --------
Noninterest-bearing li-
abilities 34,564 64,863 93,790
Stockholders' equity 232,242 225,968 222,335
---------- ---------- ----------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $4,569,969 $4,840,702 $5,525,358
========== ========== ==========
Net interest income;
Interest rate spread $100,836 2.26%(4) $130,593 2.66% $141,538 2.53%
======== ======== ========
Net earning balance(2);
Net yield on interest-
earning assets(3) $ 54,595 2.31%(4) $ 120,019 2.80% $ 96,167 2.67%
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance column. However, only
collected interest on such loans is included in the interest column.
(2) The "net earning balance" equals the difference between the average balance
of interest-earning assets and the average balance of interest-bearing lia-
bilities.
(3) The net yield on interest-earning assets during the period equals (a) the
difference between the interest income on interest-earning assets and in-
terest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, divided by (b) average in-
terest-earning assets for the period.
(4) Excluding the writedown of CDIs of $5.2 million, the interest rate spread
and the net yield on interest-earning assets for the year ended December
31, 1993, would have been 2.38% and 2.43%, respectively.
114
<PAGE>
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income
and expense for each major component of interest-earning assets and interest-
bearing liabilities and the amount of change attributable to changes in average
balances and average rates for the periods indicated. The net change attribut-
able to changes in both volume and rate, which cannot be segregated, has been
allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to
rate. Interest-bearing asset and liability balances in the calculations are
computed using the average of the daily balances during the periods. Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to the 1993 pre-
sentation.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1992
COMPARED TO DECEMBER 31, 1992 COMPARED TO DECEMBER 31, 1991
FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE) FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE)
VOLUME RATE NET VOLUME RATE NET
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income on
loans and mortgage-
backed securities $(22,252) $(58,163) $(80,415) $(56,801) $(85,043) $(141,844)
Interest income on in-
vestment securities
and cash equivalent (1,149) (722) (1,871) (1,353) (3,808) (5,161)
Investment in FHLB
stock 15 885 900 20 (2,351) (2,331)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total interest income
on
interest-earning as-
sets (23,386) (58,000) (81,386) (58,134) (91,202) (149,336)
Interest expense on de-
posits:
Demand deposits (445) 2,463 2,018 (469) 5,498 5,029
Savings deposits 1,985 3,685 5,670 (2,768) 8,079 5,311
Time deposits 15,603 20,065 35,668 28,135 65,224 93,359
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total interest expense
on deposits 17,143 26,213 43,356 24,898 78,801 103,699
Interest expense on
borrowings (8,555) 16,828 8,273 20,711 13,981 34,692
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total interest on
interest-bearing
liabilities 8,588 43,041 51,629 45,609 92,782 138,391
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in
net interest income $(14,798) $(14,959) $(29,757) $(12,525) $ 1,580 $ (10,945)
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
COMPETITION
The Bank believes that the traditional role of thrift institutions, such as Fi-
delity, as the nation's primary housing lenders has diminished, and that thrift
institutions are subject to increasing competition from commercial banks, mort-
gage bankers and others for both depositor funds and lending opportunities. In
addition, with assets of approximately $4.1 billion at March 31, 1994, the Bank
faces competition from a number of substantially larger institutions. The abil-
ity of thrift institutions, such as Fidelity, to compete by diversifying into
lending activities other than real estate lending (and residential real estate
lending in particular) and by offering investments other than deposit-like in-
vestments is limited by law and by these institutions' relative lack of experi-
ence in such other activities. However, the Bank believes these nontraditional
activities and the related fee income is vital for future success. See "Retail
Financial Services Group."
The Bank faces intense competition in attracting savings deposits and in making
real estate loans as many of the nation's largest depository and other finan-
cial institutions are headquartered or have a significant number of branches in
the areas where Fidelity conducts its business. Competition for depositors'
funds comes principally from other savings institutions, commercial banks,
money market mutual funds, credit unions, other thrift institutions, corporate
and government debt securities, insurance companies, pension funds and money
market mutual funds offered through investment banking firms. The principal ba-
sis of competition for deposits is the interest rate paid, the perceived credit
risk and the quality and types of services offered. In addition to offering
competitive rates and terms, the Bank attracts deposits through advertising,
readily accessible office locations and the quality of its customer service.
115
<PAGE>
EMPLOYEES
At March 31, 1994, the Bank had 982 active employees (this includes both full-
time and part-time employees with full-time equivalents of 908), none of whom
were represented by a collective bargaining group. Management believes that it
maintains good relations with its employees. Employees are provided with re-
tirement, 401(k) and other benefits, including life, medical, dental, vision
insurance and short and long-term disability insurance. However, the Bank is
exploring various alternatives to the existing plans to reduce the total cost,
which may include reducing future benefits accruing to employees.
Employees severely affected by the January 1994 Northridge Earthquake were
provided with access to additional time off, salary advances, favorable short-
term loans and alternate living arrangements. The total cost of these programs
is not expected to be material.
TAXATION
The Bank files a consolidated federal income tax return on a calendar year ba-
sis. For federal income tax purposes, the maximum rate of tax applicable to
savings institutions is currently 35% for taxable income over $10 million. For
California franchise tax purposes, savings institutions are taxed as "finan-
cial corporations" at a higher rate than that applicable to nonfinancial cor-
porations because of exemptions from certain state and local taxes. The Cali-
fornia franchise tax rate applicable to financial corporations is approxi-
mately 11%.
Savings institutions are generally subject to federal taxation in the same
manner as other types of corporations. However, under applicable provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code, savings institutions that meet certain definitional
and other tests ("qualifying institutions") can, unlike most other corpora-
tions, use the reserve (versus specific charge-off) method to compute their
deduction for bad debt losses.
Under the reserve method, qualifying associations are generally allowed to use
either of two alternative computations. Under the "percentage of taxable in-
come method" computation, qualifying institutions can claim a bad debt deduc-
tion computed as a percentage of taxable income before such deduction. Alter-
natively, a qualifying association may elect to utilize its own bad debt loss
experience to compute its annual addition to its bad debt reserves (the "expe-
rience method").
Prior to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 ("1986 Act"), many quali-
fying institutions, including the Bank, used the percentage of taxable income
method which generally resulted in a lower effective federal income tax rate
than that applicable to other types of corporations. However, the 1986 Act re-
duced the maximum percent that could be deducted under the percentage of tax-
able income method from 40% to 8% for tax years beginning after December 31,
1986; thus many qualifying institutions, including the Bank, began to use the
experience method beginning in 1987. The amount by which a qualifying institu-
tion's total bad debt reserves exceed the amount computed under the experience
method ("excess tax bad debt reserves") may be subject to recapture tax as
noted below.
On March 31, 1994, the bad debt reserves of the Bank for federal income tax
purposes included $16.0 million representing excess tax bad debt reserves. If,
in the future, amounts appropriated to these excess tax bad debt reserves are
used for the payment of dividends or other distributions by the Bank (includ-
ing distributions in dissolution, liquidation or redemption of stock), an
amount equal to the distribution plus the tax attributable thereto, but not
exceeding the aggregate amount of excess tax bad debt reserves, will generally
be included in the Bank's taxable income and be subject to tax. In addition,
if in the future the Bank fails to meet the definitional or other tests of a
qualifying association, the entire tax bad debt reserves of $52.5 million will
have to be recaptured and included in taxable income. Other than as discussed
under "Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations - Certain Affiliate Transfers
and Closing Adjustment," it is not contemplated that the accumulated reserves
will be used in a manner that will create such liabilities.
The Bank's tax returns have been audited by the Service through December 31,
1987 and by the California Franchise Tax Board through December 31, 1985. The
tax returns filed for 1986 through 1991 are currently under audit by the Cali-
fornia Franchise Tax Board. The tax returns for years ended 1988 and 1989 are
currently in the appeals process with the Service. In addition, the Service is
currently auditing the tax returns filed for 1990 and 1991. For additional in-
formation regarding the federal income and California franchise taxes payable
by the Bank, see Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
See "Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations" for further information.
116
<PAGE>
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
General
Fidelity is a federally-chartered savings bank, a member of the Federal Home
Loan Bank of San Francisco, and is subject to regulation by the OTS and the
FDIC. Fidelity's deposits are insured by the FDIC through SAIF to the maximum
extent permitted by law. Statutes and regulations applicable to Fidelity govern
such matters as the amount of capital Fidelity must hold; dividends, mergers
and changes of control; establishment and closing of branch offices; and the
investments and activities in which Fidelity can engage. See also "Risk Fac-
tors - Regulatory Limitations on Ownership."
Fidelity is subject to the examination, supervision and reporting requirements
of the OTS, its primary federal regulator, including a requirement for Fidelity
of at least one full scope, on-site examination every year. The Director of the
OTS is authorized to impose assessments on Fidelity to fund OTS operations, in-
cluding the cost of examinations. Fidelity is also subject to examination and
supervision by the FDIC, and the FDIC has "back-up" authority to take enforce-
ment action against Fidelity if the OTS fails to take such action after a rec-
ommendation by the FDIC. The FDIC may impose assessments on Fidelity to cover
the cost of FDIC examinations. In addition, Fidelity is subject to regulation
by the FRB with respect to certain aspects of its business.
FIRREA Capital Requirements
The OTS' capital regulations, as required by FIRREA, include three separate
minimum capital requirements for the savings institution industry - a "tangible
capital requirement," a "leverage limit" and a "risk-based capital require-
ment." These capital standards must be no less stringent than the capital stan-
dards applicable to national banks. The OTS also has the authority, after giv-
ing the affected institution notice and an opportunity to respond, to establish
individual minimum capital requirements for a savings institution which are
higher than the industry minimum requirements, upon a determination that an
IMCR is necessary or appropriate in light of the institution's particular cir-
cumstances, such as if the institution is expected to have losses resulting in
capital inadequacy, has a high degree of exposure to credit risk, or has a high
amount of nonperforming loans. The OTS has proposed a regulation that would add
to the list of circumstances in which an IMCR may be appropriate for a savings
association the following: a high degree of exposure to concentration of credit
risk or risks arising from nontraditional activities, or failure to adequately
monitor and control the risks presented by concentration of credit and
nontraditional activities.
The industry minimum capital requirements are as follows:
Tangible capital of at least 1.5% of adjusted total assets. Tangible capital is
composed of (1) an institution's common stock, perpetual noncumulative pre-
ferred stock, and related earnings, and (2) the amount, if any, of equity in-
vestment by others in the institution's subsidiaries, after deducting (a) in-
tangible assets other than purchased mortgage servicing rights, and (b) the in-
stitution's investments in and extensions of credit to subsidiaries engaged as
principal in activities not permissible for national banks, net of any reserves
established against such investments, subject to a phase-out ending July 1,
1996 rather than a deduction for the amount of investments made or committed to
be made prior to April 12, 1989. In general, adjusted total assets equal the
institution's consolidated total assets, minus any assets that are deducted in
calculating capital.
Core capital of at least 3% of adjusted total assets (the "leverage limit").
Core capital consists of tangible capital plus (1) goodwill resulting from pre-
April 12, 1989 acquisitions of troubled savings institutions, subject to a
phase-out ending December 31, 1994; and (2) certain marketable intangible as-
sets, such as core deposit premium (the premium paid for acquisition of depos-
its from other institutions). Deferred tax assets whose realization depends on
the institution's future taxable income (exclusive of income attributable to
reversing taxable temporary differences and carry forwards) or on the institu-
tion's tax-planning strategies must be deducted from core capital to the extent
that such assets exceed the lesser of (1) 10% of core capital, or (2) the
amount of such assets that can be realized within one year, unless such assets
were reportable as of December 31, 1992, in which case no deduction is re-
quired.
117
<PAGE>
The OTS has recently adopted a regulation effective March 4, 1994, with re-
spect to the inclusion of intangible assets in regulatory capital. Under this
regulation, purchased mortgage servicing rights will generally be includible
in tangible and core capital, and purchased credit card relationships will
generally be includible in core capital, as long as they do not exceed 50% of
core capital in the aggregate, with a separate sublimit of 25% for purchased
credit card relationships. All other intangible assets, including core deposit
premium, will generally have to be deducted. Core deposit intangible in exist-
ence on March 4, 1994, however, may continue to be included in core capital to
the extent permitted by the OTS, as long as the premium is valued in accor-
dance with GAAP, supported by credible assumptions, and its amortization is
adjusted at least annually. At December 31, 1993, Fidelity included $2.1 mil-
lion of core deposit premium in core capital. Fidelity anticipates that such
$2.1 million in core deposit premium will continue to be includible in core
capital after March 4, 1994.
Total capital of at least 8% of risk-weighted assets (the "risk-based capital
requirement"). Total capital includes both core capital and "supplementary"
capital items deemed less permanent than core capital, such as subordinated
debt and general loan loss allowances (subject to certain limits), but equity
investments (with the exception of investments in subsidiaries and investments
permissible for national banks) and portions of certain high-risk land loans
and nonresidential construction loans must be deducted from total capital,
subject to a phase-out rather than a deduction until July 1, 1994. At least
half of total capital must consist of core capital.
Risk-weighted assets are determined by multiplying each category of an insti-
tution's assets, including off balance sheet asset equivalents, by an assigned
risk weight based on the credit risk associated with those assets, and adding
the resulting sums. The four risk weight categories range from zero percent
for cash and government securities to 100% for assets (including past-due
loans and real estate owned) that do not qualify for preferential risk-weight-
ing.
On March 18, 1994, the OTS published a final regulation effective on that date
that permits a loan secured by multifamily residential property, regardless of
the number of units, to be risk-weighted at 50% for purposes of the risk-based
capital standards if the loan meets specified criteria relating to the term of
the loan, timely payments of interest and principal, loan-to-value ratio and
ratio of net operating income to debt service requirements. Under the prior
regulation, only loans secured by multifamily residential properties consist-
ing of 5 to 36 units were eligible for risk-weighting at 50%, and then only if
such loans had a loan-to-value ratio at origination of not more than 80% and
the collateral property had an average annual occupancy rate of at least 80%
for a year or more. Based upon the results of Fidelity's annual survey, man-
agement believes that at December 31, 1993, at which time the prior rule was
still in effect, approximately 85% of Fidelity's portfolio of loans secured by
multifamily residences with 5 to 36 units qualified for 50% risk-weighting.
Any loans that qualified for risk-weighting under the prior regulation as of
March 18, 1994 will be "grandfathered" and will continue to be risk-weighted
at 50% as long as they continue to meet the criteria of the prior regulation.
Thus occupancy rates, which recently have been decreasing generally, will con-
tinue to affect the risk-weighting of such grandfathered multifamily loans un-
less such loans qualify for 50% risk-weighting under the criteria of the new
rule, which criteria do not include an occupancy requirement.
Under the prior rule, loans secured by multifamily residential properties with
more than 36 units were required to be risk-weighted at 100% even if they met
the loan-to-value and occupancy criteria applicable to loans secured by 5 to
36 unit properties. As of December 31, 1993, Fidelity held $406.3 million in
loans secured by multifamily residential properties with 37 or more units,
some of which qualify under the criteria of the new regulation for 50% risk-
weighting. Therefore, Fidelity's risk-based capital ratio could increase. How-
ever, some of Fidelity's existing loans secured by 5 to 36 unit residential
properties could increase in risk-weighting from 50% to 100% if they fail to
qualify for grandfathering and if they do not meet the additional criteria of
the new rule, which would have a negative effect on Fidelity's risk-based cap-
ital ratio. The ultimate impact on Fidelity of the new regulation has not been
determined.
118
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the regulatory capital requirements for Fidelity
under FIRREA at March 31, 1994, but does not reflect the required future phas-
ing out of certain assets, including (a) investments in, and loans to, subsidi-
aries which may presently be engaged in activities not permitted for national
banks, and (b) for risk-based capital, real estate held for investment (the im-
pact of which the Bank believes is immaterial). The impact of certain proposed
regulations is also not reflected in the following table. As indicated in the
table, Fidelity's capital levels exceed all three of the currently applicable
minimum capital requirements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1994
CURRENT RISK-
BASED
TANGIBLE CAPITAL CORE CAPITAL CAPITAL
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
(Dollars in thousands) ---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stockholder's equity(1) $ 166,900 $ 166,900 $ 166,900
Adjustments:
Intangible assets (1,800) - -
Nonincludable subsidi-
aries (200) (200) (200)
General valuation al-
lowance - - 35,400
Qualifying subordinated
notes - - 59,200
Equity investments - - (7,800)
---------- ---------- ----------
Regulatory capital(2) 164,900 4.00% 166,700 4.04% 253,500 9.10%
Required minimum 61,900 1.50% 123,800 3.00% 222,900 8.00%
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Excess capital $ 103,000 2.50% $ 42,900 1.04% $ 30,600 1.10%
========== ===== ========== ===== ========== =====
Adjusted assets(3) $4,124,600 $4,126,500 $2,786,600
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) Fidelity's total stockholder's equity, in accordance with generally ac-
cepted accounting principles, was 4.06% of its total assets at March 31,
1994.
(2) At periodic intervals, both the OTS and the FDIC routinely examine the Bank
as part of their legally prescribed oversight of the industry. Based on
their examinations, the regulators can direct that the Bank's financial
statements be adjusted in accordance with their findings.
(3) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(a) for purposes of tangible and core
capital requirements, and for purposes of risk-based capital requirements,
refers to the term "risk-weighted assets" as defined in 12 C.F.R. section
567.1(bb).
Savings institutions that do not meet the industry minimum capital requirements
are subject to (i) a number of sanctions similar to but less restrictive than
the sanctions under the PCA, and (ii) a requirement that the OTS be notified of
any changes in Fidelity's directors or senior executive officers.
The OTS is required to revise its risk-based capital standards to ensure that
those standards take adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of
credit risk, and risks of nontraditional activities. The OTS added an interest
rate risk capital component to its risk-based capital requirement effective
September 30, 1994, based on the December 31, 1993 balance sheet. This capital
component will require institutions deemed to have above normal interest rate
risk to hold additional capital equal to 50% of the excess risk. As of December
31, 1993, the Bank's internal interest rate risk measurement system showed a
risk level of less than half the OTS limit. The most recently available OTS re-
port (September 30, 1993) shows an even lower interest rate risk. Therefore, if
the requirement had been in effect on March 31, 1994, using the December 31,
1993 balance sheet, there would have been no interest rate risk component re-
quired to be added to Fidelity's risk-based capital requirement.
119
<PAGE>
FDICIA Prompt Corrective Action Requirements
The FDICIA required the OTS to implement a system requiring regulatory sanc-
tions against institutions that are not adequately capitalized, with the sanc-
tions growing more severe the lower the institution's capital. The OTS was re-
quired to and has established specific capital ratios under the PCA for five
separate capital categories: "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "un-
dercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized," and "critically undercapi-
talized."
Under the OTS regulations implementing FDICIA, an institution is treated as
well capitalized if its ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is at
least 10.0%, its ratio of core capital to risk-weighted assets is at least
6.0%, its ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets is at least 5.0%, and
it is not subject to any order or directive by the OTS to meet a specific capi-
tal level. An institution will be adequately capitalized if its ratio of total
capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 8.0%, its ratio of core capital to
risk-weighted assets is at least 4.0%, and its ratio of core capital to ad-
justed total assets (leverage ratio) is at least 4.0% (3.0% if the institution
receives the highest rating on the CAMEL financial institutions rating system).
The OTS has stated that it intends to lower the leverage ratio requirement to
3.0% for all savings institutions after September 30, 1994, when the interest
rate risk component of its capital regulations goes into effect. The OTS' re-
duction of the leverage ratio requirement may depend on obtaining agreement of
the other federal banking agencies to such a reduction, and no assurances can
be given that the reduction will occur.
An institution whose capital does not meet the amounts required in order to be
adequately capitalized will be treated as undercapitalized. If an undercapital-
ized institution's capital ratios are less than 6.0%, 3.0%, or 3.0% respective-
ly, it will be treated as significantly undercapitalized. Finally, an institu-
tion will be treated as critically undercapitalized if its ratio of "tangible
equity" (core capital plus cumulative preferred stock minus intangible assets
other than supervisory goodwill and purchased mortgage servicing rights) to ad-
justed total assets is equal to or less than 2.0%.
An institution's capital category is based on its capital levels as of the most
recent of the following dates: (1) the date the institution's most recent quar-
terly Thrift Financial Report ("TFR") was required to be filed with the OTS;
(2) the date the institution received from the OTS its most recent final report
of examination; or (3) the date the institution received written notice from
the OTS of the institution's capital category. If subsequent to the most recent
TFR or report of examination a material event has occurred that would cause the
institution to be placed in a lower capital category, the institution must pro-
vide written notice to the OTS within 15 days, and the OTS shall determine
whether to change the association's capital category.
The following table summarizes the capital ratios of the adequately capitalized
category and Fidelity's regulatory capital at March 31, 1994 as compared to
such ratios. As indicated in the table, Fidelity's capital levels exceeded the
three minimum capital ratios of the adequately capitalized category.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------
CORE CAPITAL TO CORE CAPITAL TO TOTAL CAPITAL
ADJUSTED TOTAL RISK-WEIGHTED TO RISK-WEIGHTED
ASSETS ASSETS ASSETS
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Fidelity's regulatory
capital $ 166,700 4.04% $ 166,700 5.98% $ 253,500 9.10%
Adequately capitalized
requirement 165,100 4.00% 111,500 4.00% 222,900 8.00%
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Excess capital $ 1,600 0.04% $ 55,200 1.98% $ 30,600 1.10%
========== ===== ========== ===== ========== =====
Adjusted assets(1) $4,126,500 $2,786,600 $2,786,600
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(a) for purposes of core capital require-
ments, and for purposes of risk-based capital requirements, refers to the
term "risk-weighted assets" as defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(bb).
120
<PAGE>
At March 31, 1994, the Bank was classified as adequately capitalized. However,
Citadel supplemented the Bank's capital in 1993 with two capital infusions to-
taling $28 million and the Bank sold $115.3 million in performing loans in a
bulk sale transaction during the first quarter of 1994. Without these actions,
the Bank's core capital ratio at March 31, 1994 would have fallen below 4% and
the Bank would have been classified as undercapitalized. Management antici-
pates that the Bank will incur losses in the second quarter of 1994. These
losses will, in the absence of a new capital infusion or a further reduction
in the Bank's total assets, reduce the Bank's core capital ratio to less than
4% at June 30, 1994 and thereby render it undercapitalized.
Mandatory Sanctions Tied to Prompt Corrective Action Capital Categories
Capital Restoration Plan. An institution that is undercapitalized must submit
a capital restoration plan to the OTS within 45 days after becoming undercapi-
talized. The capital restoration plan must specify the steps the institution
will take to become adequately capitalized, the levels of capital the institu-
tion will attain while the plan is in effect, the types and levels of activi-
ties the institution will conduct, and such other information as the OTS may
require. The OTS must act on the capital restoration plan expeditiously, and
generally not later than 60 days after the plan is submitted.
The OTS may approve a capital restoration plan only if the OTS determines that
the plan is likely to succeed in restoring the institution's capital and will
not appreciably increase the risks to which the institution is exposed. In ad-
dition, the OTS may approve a capital restoration plan only if the institu-
tion's performance under the plan is guaranteed by every company that controls
the institution, up to the lesser of (a) 5% of the institution's total assets
at the time the institution became undercapitalized, or (b) the amount neces-
sary to bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards as of
the time the institution fails to comply with its capital restoration plan.
Such guarantee must remain in effect until the institution has been adequately
capitalized for four consecutive quarters, and the controlling company or com-
panies must provide the OTS with appropriate assurances of their ability to
perform the guarantee. If the controlling company guarantee is not acceptable,
the OTS may treat the "undercapitalized" institution as "significantly under-
capitalized." There are additional restrictions which are applicable to "sig-
nificantly undercapitalized" institutions which are described below.
Limits on Expansion. An institution that is undercapitalized, even if its cap-
ital restoration plan has been approved, may not acquire an interest in any
company, open a new branch office, or engage in a new line of business unless
the OTS determines that such action would further the implementation of the
institution's capital plan or the FDIC approves the action. An undercapital-
ized institution also may not increase its average total assets during any
quarter except in accordance with an approved capital restoration plan.
Capital Distributions. With one exception, an undercapitalized savings insti-
tution generally may not pay any dividends or make other capital distribu-
tions. Under the exception, the OTS may permit, after consultation with the
FDIC, repurchases or redemptions of the institution's shares that are made in
connection with the issuance of additional shares to improve the institution's
financial condition. Undercapitalized institutions also may not pay management
fees to any company or individual that controls the institution. Similarly, an
adequately capitalized institution may not make a capital distribution or pay
a management fee to a controlling person if such payment would cause the in-
stitution to become undercapitalized.
Brokered Deposits and Benefit Plan Deposits. An undercapitalized savings in-
stitution cannot accept, renew, or rollover deposits obtained through a de-
posit broker, and may not solicit deposits by offering interest rates that are
more than 75 basis points higher than market rates. Savings institutions that
are adequately capitalized but not well capitalized must obtain a waiver from
the FDIC in order to accept, renew, or rollover brokered deposits, and even if
a waiver is granted may not solicit deposits, through a broker or otherwise,
by offering interest rates that exceed market rates by more than 75 basis
points.
Institutions that are ineligible to accept brokered deposits can only offer
FDIC insurance coverage for employee benefit plan deposits up to $100,000 per
plan, rather than $100,000 per plan participant, unless, at the time such de-
posits are accepted, the institution meets all applicable capital standards
and certifies to the benefit plan depositor that its deposits are eligible for
coverage on a per-participant basis.
121
<PAGE>
The Bank currently accepts brokered deposits ($38.3 million as of March 31,
1994) pursuant to a waiver obtained from the FDIC, which waiver will expire in
October, 1994. Management of the Bank intends to request another waiver if it
is required in order to continue to accept or renew brokered deposits. There
can be no assurance that the FDIC will grant such a waiver and if the Bank be-
comes undercapitalized, the FDIC will not be able to grant such a waiver.
Restrictions on Significantly and Critically Undercapitalized Institutions. In
addition to the above mandatory restrictions which apply to all undercapital-
ized savings institutions, institutions that are significantly undercapitalized
may not without the OTS's prior approval (a) pay a bonus to any senior execu-
tive officer, or (b) increase any senior executive officer's compensation over
the average rate of compensation (excluding bonuses, options and profit-shar-
ing) during the 12 months preceding the month in which the institution became
undercapitalized. The same restriction applies to undercapitalized institutions
that fail to submit or implement an acceptable capital restoration plan.
If a savings institution is critically undercapitalized, the institution is
also prohibited from making payments of principal or interest on subordinated
debt beginning sixty days after the institution becomes critically undercapi-
talized, unless the FDIC permits such payments or the subordinated debt was
outstanding on July 15, 1991 and has not subsequently been extended or renego-
tiated. In addition, the institution cannot without prior FDIC approval enter
into any material transaction outside the ordinary course of business. Criti-
cally undercapitalized savings institutions must be placed in receivership or
conservatorship within 90 days of becoming critically undercapitalized unless
the OTS, with the concurrence of the FDIC, determines that some other action
would better resolve the problems of the institution at the least possible
long-term loss to the insurance fund, and documents the reasons for its deter-
mination. A determination by the OTS not to place a critically undercapitalized
institution in conservatorship or receivership must be reviewed every 90 days.
If the institution remains critically undercapitalized on average during the
calendar quarter beginning 270 days after it became critically undercapital-
ized, the findings which the OTS must make regarding the viability of the in-
stitution in order to avoid the appointment of a conservator or receiver become
more stringent.
Discretionary Sanctions Tied to Prompt Corrective Action Capital Categories
Operating Restrictions. With respect to an undercapitalized institution, the
OTS will, if it deems such actions necessary to resolve the institution's prob-
lems at the least possible loss to the insurance fund, have the explicit au-
thority to: (a) order the institution to recapitalize by selling shares of cap-
ital stock or other securities; (b) order the institution to agree to be ac-
quired by another depository institution holding company or combine with an-
other depository institution; (c) restrict transactions with affiliates; (d)
restrict the interest rates paid by the institution on new deposits to the pre-
vailing rates of interest in the region where the institution is located; (e)
require reduction of the institution's assets; (f) restrict any activities that
the OTS determines pose excessive risk to the institution; (g) order a new
election of directors; (h) order the institution to dismiss any director or se-
nior executive officer who held office for more than 180 days before the insti-
tution became undercapitalized, subject to the director's or officer's right to
obtain administrative review of the dismissal; (i) order the institution to em-
ploy qualified senior executive officers subject to the OTS's approval; (j)
prohibit the acceptance of deposits from correspondent depository institutions;
(k) require the institution to divest any subsidiary or the institution's hold-
ing company to divest the institution or any other subsidiary; or (l) take any
other action that the OTS determines will better resolve the institution's
problems at the least possible loss to the deposit insurance fund.
If an institution is significantly undercapitalized, or if it is undercapital-
ized and its capital restoration plan is not approved or implemented within the
required time periods, the OTS must take one or more of the above actions, and
must take the actions described in clauses (a) or (b), (c) and (d) above unless
it finds that such actions would not resolve the institution's problems at the
least possible loss to the deposit insurance fund. The OTS also may prohibit
the institution from making payments on any outstanding subordinated debt or
entering into material transactions outside the ordinary course of business
without the OTS's prior approval.
122
<PAGE>
The OTS' determination to order one or more of the above discretionary actions
will be evidenced by a written directive to the institution, and the OTS will
generally issue a directive only after giving the institution prior notice and
an opportunity to respond. The period for response shall be at least 14 days
unless the OTS determines that a shorter period is appropriate based on the
circumstances. The OTS, however, may issue a directive without providing any
prior notice if the OTS determines that such action is necessary to resolve
the institution's problems at the least possible loss to the deposit insurance
fund. In such a case, the directive will be effective immediately, but the in-
stitution may appeal the directive to the OTS within 14 days.
Receivership or Conservatorship. In addition to the mandatory appointment of a
conservator or receiver for critically undercapitalized institutions, de-
scribed above, the OTS or FDIC may appoint a receiver or conservator for an
institution if the institution is undercapitalized and (a) has no reasonable
prospect of becoming adequately capitalized, (b) fails to submit a capital
restoration plan within the required time period, or (c) materially fails to
implement its capital restoration plan. FDICIA provides that directors of an
FDIC-insured depository institution will have no liability to the institu-
tion's stockholders or creditors if they consent in good faith to the appoint-
ment of a conservator or receiver or to an FDIC-assisted sale of the institu-
tion.
Down-grading to Lower Capital Category. The OTS can apply to an institution in
a particular capital category the sanctions that apply to the next lower capi-
tal category, if the OTS determines, after providing the institution notice
and opportunity for a hearing, that (a) the institution is in an unsafe or un-
sound condition, or (b) the institution received, in its most recent report of
examination, a less-than-satisfactory rating for asset quality, management,
earnings or liquidity, and the deficiency has not been corrected. The OTS can-
not, however, use this authority to require an adequately capitalized institu-
tion to file a capital restoration plan, or to subject a significantly under-
capitalized institution to the sanctions applicable to critically undercapi-
talized institutions.
Expanded Regulatory Authority Under FDICIA
In addition to the prompt corrective action provisions discussed above based
on an institution's regulatory capital ratios, FDICIA contains several mea-
sures intended to promote early identification of management problems at de-
pository institutions and to ensure that regulators intervene promptly to re-
quire corrective action by institutions with inadequate operational and mana-
gerial standards.
Safety and Soundness Standards. FDICIA requires the OTS to prescribe minimum
acceptable operational and managerial standards, and standards for asset qual-
ity, earnings, and valuation of publicly traded shares, for savings institu-
tions and their holding companies. Such standards were to be effective no
later than December 1, 1993, but have not yet been finalized. The operational
standards must cover internal controls, loan documentation, credit underwrit-
ing, interest rate exposure, asset growth, and employee compensation. The as-
set quality and earnings standards must specify a maximum ratio of classified
assets to capital, minimum earnings sufficient to absorb losses, and minimum
ratio of market value to book value for publicly traded shares.
Any institution or holding company that fails to meet the standards must sub-
mit a plan for corrective action within 30 days. If a savings institution
fails to submit or implement an acceptable plan, the OTS must order it to cor-
rect the safety and soundness deficiency, and may restrict its rate of asset
growth, prohibit asset growth entirely, require the institution to increase
its ratio of tangible equity to assets, restrict the interest rate paid on de-
posits to the prevailing rates of interest on deposits of comparable amounts
and maturities, or require the institution to take any other action that the
OTS determines will better carry out the purpose of prompt corrective action.
Imposition of these sanctions is within the discretion of the OTS in most
cases but is mandatory if the savings institution commenced operations or ex-
perienced a change in control during the 24 months preceding the institution's
failure to meet the safety and soundness standards, or underwent extraordinary
growth during the preceding 18 months.
The OTS and other federal banking agencies have jointly published a proposed
regulation prescribing the required safety and soundness standards. Among
other things, the proposed regulation would set out asset quality standards
which specify that the ratio of a depository institution's classified assets
to the sum of (a) its total capital and (b) GVA not included in total capital
should not exceed 100%. Minimum earnings standards would require that institu-
tions
123
<PAGE>
be able to demonstrate pro forma compliance with capital requirements if net
earnings or losses over the preceding four quarters continue over the next four
quarters. If the proposed safety and soundness standards had been in effect at
March 31, 1994, Fidelity would not have been in compliance with the minimum
earnings standard or the maximum ratio of classified assets to capital standard
and would have been required to submit a plan for corrective action.
Under the proposed regulation, the safety and soundness standards would apply
primarily at the savings institution level, and savings and loan holding compa-
nies such as Citadel would only be required (a) to ensure that their transac-
tions with a subsidiary savings institution are not detrimental to the institu-
tion, (b) to avoid creating a serious risk that the holding company's liabili-
ties would be imposed on the institution, (c) not to take any action that would
impede the institution's compliance with the safety and soundness standards,
and (d) if the subsidiary institution is required to submit a plan for correc-
tive action, to take any corporate actions necessary to enable the subsidiary
to take the actions required by the plan.
Expanded Requirements Relating to Internal Controls. Each depository institu-
tion with assets above a specified threshold (which the FDIC has set at $500
million and which therefore includes Fidelity) must prepare an annual report,
signed by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, on the ef-
fectiveness of the institution's internal control structures and procedures for
financial reporting, and on the institution's compliance with laws and regula-
tions relating to safety and soundness. The institution's independent public
accountant must attest to, and report separately on, management's assertions in
the annual report. The report and the attestation, along with financial state-
ments and such other disclosure requirements as the FDIC and the OTS may pre-
scribe, must be submitted to the FDIC and OTS and will be available to the pub-
lic.
Every institution with assets above the $500 million threshold must also have
an audit committee of its Board of Directors made up entirely of directors who
are independent of the management of the institution. Fidelity is in compliance
with this requirement. Audit committees of "large" institutions (defined by the
FDIC as an institution with more than $3 billion in assets, which includes Fi-
delity) must include members with banking or financial management expertise,
may not include members who are large customers of the institution, and must
have access to independent counsel.
Activities Restrictions Not Related to Capital Compliance
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. The qualified thrift lender ("QTL") test requires
that, in at least nine out of every twelve months, at least 65% of a savings
bank's "portfolio assets" must be invested in a limited list of qualified
thrift investments, primarily investments related to housing loans. If Fidelity
fails to satisfy the QTL test and does not requalify as a QTL within one year,
any entity in control of Fidelity must register and be regulated as a bank
holding company, and Fidelity must either convert to a commercial bank charter
or become subject to restrictions on branching, business activities and divi-
dends as if it were a national bank.
Portfolio assets consist of tangible assets minus (a) assets used to satisfy
liquidity requirements, and (b) property used by the institution to conduct its
business. Assets that may be counted as qualified thrift investments without
limit include residential mortgage and construction loans; home improvement and
repair loans; mortgage-backed securities; home equity loans; Federal Savings
and Loan Insurance Corporation ("FSLIC"), FDIC, Resolution Funding Corporation
and Resolution Trust Corporation obligations; and FHLB stock.
Assets includable subject to an aggregate maximum of 20% of portfolio assets
include Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation stock; investments in residential housing-oriented subsidiaries;
consumer and education loans up to a maximum of 10% of portfolio assets; 200%
of loans for development of low-income housing; 200% of certain community de-
velopment loans; loans to construct, purchase or maintain churches, schools,
nursing homes and hospitals; and 50% of any residential mortgage loans origi-
nated by the institution and sold during the month for which the QTL calcula-
tion is made, if such loans were sold within 90 days of origination. At Decem-
ber 31, 1993, 89.8% of Fidelity's portfolio assets constituted qualified thrift
investments.
Investments and Loans. In general, federal savings institutions such as Fidel-
ity may not invest directly in equity securities, noninvestment grade debt se-
curities, or real estate, other than real estate used for the institution's of-
fices and related facilities. Indirect equity investment in real estate through
a subsidiary is permissible, but subject to limitations based on the amount of
the institution's assets, and the institution's investment in such a subsidiary
must be deducted from regula-
124
<PAGE>
tory capital in full or (for certain subsidiaries owned by the institution
prior to April 12, 1989) phased out of capital by no later than July 1, 1996.
Loans by a savings institution to a single borrower are generally limited to
15% of the institution's "unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus," which is
similar but not identical to total capital. At December 31, 1993, the largest
Fidelity borrower had a total outstanding balance of $31.5 million or 10.1% of
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Aggregate loans secured by nonresi-
dential real property are generally limited to 400% of the institution's total
capital. Commercial loans may not exceed 10% of Fidelity's total assets, and
consumer loans may not exceed 35% of Fidelity's total assets. At March 31,
1994, Fidelity was in compliance with the above investment limits.
Activities of Subsidiaries. A savings institution seeking to establish a new
subsidiary, acquire control of an existing company or conduct a new activity
through an existing subsidiary must provide 30 days prior notice to the FDIC
and OTS. A subsidiary of Fidelity may be able to engage in activities that are
not permissible for Fidelity directly, if the OTS determines that such activi-
ties are reasonably related to Fidelity's business, but Fidelity may be re-
quired to deduct its investment in such a subsidiary from capital. The OTS has
the power to require a savings institution to divest any subsidiary or termi-
nate any activity conducted by a subsidiary that the OTS determines to be a se-
rious threat to the financial safety, soundness or stability of such savings
institution or to be otherwise inconsistent with sound banking practices.
Real Estate Lending Standards. The OTS and the other federal banking agencies
have adopted regulations, effective March 19, 1993, which require institutions
to adopt and at least annually review written real estate lending policies. The
lending policies must include diversification standards, underwriting standards
(including loan-to-value limits), loan administration procedures, and proce-
dures for monitoring compliance with the policies. The policies must reflect
consideration of guidelines adopted by the banking agencies. Among the guide-
lines adopted by the agencies are maximum loan-to-value ratios for land loans
(65%); development loans (75%); construction loans (80%-85%); loans on owner-
occupied 1 to 4 family property, including home equity loans (no limit, but
loans at or above 90% require private mortgage insurance); and loans on other
improved property (85%).
The guidelines permit institutions to make loans in excess of the supervisory
loan-to-value limits if such loans are supported by other credit factors, but
the aggregate of such nonconforming loans should not exceed the institution's
risk-based capital, and the aggregate of nonconforming loans secured by real
estate other than 1 to 4 family property should not exceed 30% of risk-based
capital. Fidelity believes that its current lending policies and practices are
consistent with the guidelines.
Additional Regulatory Restrictions. See "General - Recent Developments - OTS
Examinations."
Deposit Insurance
General. Fidelity's deposits are insured by the FDIC to a maximum of $100,000
for each insured depositor. Under FIRREA, the FDIC administers two separate de-
posit insurance funds: the Bank Insurance Fund (the "BIF") which insures the
deposits of institutions that were insured by the FDIC prior to FIRREA, and the
SAIF which maintains a fund to insure the deposits of institutions, such as Fi-
delity, that were insured by the FSLIC prior to FIRREA.
Insurance Premium Assessments. The FDICIA directed the FDIC to establish by
January 1, 1994, a risk-based system for setting deposit insurance assessments.
The FDIC has implemented such a system, under which an institution's insurance
assessments will vary depending on the level of capital the institution holds
and the degree to which it is the subject of supervisory concern to the FDIC.
Under the FDIC's system, the assessment rate for both BIF deposits and SAIF de-
posits varies from 0.23% of covered deposits for well-capitalized institutions
that are deemed to have no more than a few minor weaknesses, to 0.31% of cov-
ered deposits for less than adequately capitalized institutions that pose sub-
stantial supervisory concern. The FDIC in the future may determine to change
the assessment rates, or the parity of BIF and SAIF rates, based on the condi-
tion of the BIF and the SAIF.
Under current law, the SAIF has three major obligations: beginning in 1995, to
fund losses associated with the failure of institutions with SAIF-insured de-
posits; to increase its reserves to 1.25% of insured deposits over a reasonable
period of
125
<PAGE>
time; and to make interest payments on debt incurred to provide funds to the
former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation ("FICO debt"). The re-
serves of the SAIF are currently lower than the reserves of the BIF, and the
BIF does not have an obligation to pay interest on FICO debt. Recent legisla-
tion authorizes the United States Treasury to provide up to $8 billion to the
SAIF, but use of such funds would require additional Congressional action, and
the funds could be used only to cover SAIF losses and only under limited cir-
cumstances. Therefore, in the future premiums assessed on deposits insured by
the SAIF may be higher than premiums on deposits insured by the BIF. Such a
premium structure could provide institutions whose deposits are exclusively or
primarily BIF-insured (such as almost all commercial banks) certain competitive
advantages over institutions whose deposits are SAIF-insured (such as Fidelity)
in the pricing of loans and deposits and in lower operating costs. Such a com-
petitive disadvantage could have an adverse effect on Fidelity's results of op-
erations.
Termination of Deposit Insurance. The FDIC may initiate a proceeding to termi-
nate an institution's deposit insurance if, among other things, the institution
is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations. It is the policy
of the FDIC to deem an insured institution to be in an unsafe or unsound condi-
tion if its ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is less than 2%. Tier 1
capital is similar to core capital but includes certain investments in and ex-
tensions of credit to subsidiaries engaged in activities not permitted for na-
tional banks.
Conversion of Deposit Insurance. Generally, savings institutions may not con-
vert from SAIF membership to BIF membership until SAIF has increased its re-
serves to 1.25% of insured deposits. However, a savings institution may convert
to a bank charter, if the resulting bank remains a SAIF member, and may merge
with a BIF member institution as long as deposits attributable to the savings
institution remain subject to assessment by the SAIF. In addition, under an ex-
ception to the moratorium, savings institutions may transfer and convert to BIF
insurance (for example, in a branch sale to a BIF member institution) up to 35%
of their deposits. Institutions that convert from SAIF to BIF membership, ei-
ther under an exception during the moratorium or after expiration of the mora-
torium, must pay exit fees to SAIF and entrance fees to BIF.
REGULATION OF FIDELITY AFFILIATES AND DIVIDENDS
Affiliate and Insider Transactions. The ability of Citadel, Gateway and any
other affiliates of the Bank to deal with Fidelity is limited by the affiliate
transaction rules, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act
which also govern BIF-insured banks. With very limited exceptions, these rules
require that all transactions between Fidelity and an affiliate must be on
arms' length terms. The term "affiliate" covers any company that controls or is
under common control with Fidelity, but does not include individuals and gener-
ally does not include Fidelity's subsidiaries.
Under Section 23A and section 11 of the Home Owners' Loan Act, specific re-
strictions apply to transactions in which Fidelity provides funding to its af-
filiates: Fidelity may not purchase the securities of an affiliate, make a loan
to any affiliate that is engaged in activities not permissible for a bank hold-
ing company, or acquire from an affiliate any asset that has been classified, a
nonaccrual loan, a restructured loan, or a loan that is more than 30 days past
due. As to affiliates engaged in bank holding company-permissible activities,
the aggregate of (a) loans, guarantees, and letters of credit provided by the
savings bank for the benefit of any one affiliate, and (b) purchases of assets
by the savings bank from the affiliate, may not exceed 10% of the savings
bank's capital stock and surplus (20% for the aggregate of permissible transac-
tions with all affiliates). All loans to affiliates must be secured by collat-
eral equal to at least 100% of the amount of the loan (130% if the collateral
consists of equity securities, leases or real property).
In addition, OTS regulations on affiliate transactions require, among other
things, that savings institutions retain records of their affiliate transac-
tions that reflect such transactions in reasonable detail. If a savings insti-
tution has been the subject of a change of control application or notice within
the preceding two-year period, does not meet its minimum capital requirements,
has entered into a supervisory agreement, is subject to a formal enforcement
proceeding, or is determined by the OTS to be the subject of supervisory con-
cern, the institution may be required to provide the OTS with 30 days' prior
notice of any affiliate transaction.
Loans by Fidelity to directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders of
Citadel, Fidelity and their subsidiaries (collectively, "insiders"), or to a
corporation or partnership that is at least 10% owned by an insider (a "related
interest") are subject to limits separate from the affiliate transaction rules.
However, a company that controls a savings institution is
126
<PAGE>
excluded from the coverage of the insider lending rules even if it owns 10% or
more of the stock of the institution, and is subject only to the affiliate
transaction rules. All loans to insiders and their related interests must be
underwritten and made on non-preferential terms; loans in excess of $500,000
must be approved in advance by Fidelity's Board of Directors; and Fidelity's
total of such loans may not exceed 100% of Fidelity's capital. Loans by Fidel-
ity to its executive officers are subject to additional limits which are even
more stringent. Fidelity has adopted a policy which requires prior approval of
its Board of Directors for any loans to insiders or their related interests.
See "Risk Factors - Certain Considerations Regarding the Offering - Regulatory
Limitations on Ownership; Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions" regarding the
potential savings and loan holding company status of investors.
Payment of Dividends and Other Capital Distributions. The payment of dividends,
stock repurchases, and other capital distributions by Fidelity to its stock-
holders is subject to regulation by the OTS. Currently, 30 days prior notice to
the OTS of any capital distribution is required. The OTS has promulgated a reg-
ulation that measures a savings institution's ability to make a capital distri-
bution according to the institution's capital position. The rule establishes
"safe-harbor" amounts of capital distributions that institutions can make after
providing notice to the OTS, but without needing prior approval. Institutions
can distribute amounts in excess of the safe harbor only with the prior ap-
proval of the OTS.
For institutions ("Tier 1 institutions") that meet their fully phased-in capi-
tal requirements (the requirements that will apply when the phase-out of super-
visory goodwill and investments in certain subsidiaries from capital is com-
plete), the safe harbor amount is the greater of (a) 75% of net income for the
prior four quarters, or (b) the sum of (1) the current year's net income and
(2) the amount that would reduce the excess of the institution's total capital
to risk-weighted assets ratio over 8% to one-half of such excess at the begin-
ning of the year in which the dividend is paid. For institutions that meet
their current minimum capital requirements but do not meet their fully phased-
in requirements ("Tier 2 institutions"), the safe harbor distribution is 75% of
net income for the prior four quarters. As a function of the prompt corrective
action provisions discussed above and the OTS regulation regarding capital dis-
tributions, savings institutions that do not meet their current minimum capital
requirements ("Tier 3 institutions") may not make any capital distributions,
with the exception of repurchases or redemptions of the institution's shares
permitted by the OTS, after consultation with the FDIC, that are made in con-
nection with the issuance of additional shares and that will improve the insti-
tution's financial condition.
The OTS retains the authority to prohibit any capital distribution otherwise
authorized under the regulation if the OTS determines that the distribution
would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. The OTS also may reclassify a
Tier 1 institution as a Tier 2 or Tier 3 institution by notifying the institu-
tion that it is in need of more than normal supervision. While Fidelity was a
Tier 1 institution at December 31, 1993, the OTS has taken action that could
cause Fidelity to be reclassified as a Tier 2 or Tier 3 institution. Further,
an adequately capitalized institution may not make a capital distribution if
such payment would cause the institution to become undercapitalized. Because of
Fidelity's current capital levels, dividends and distributions from Fidelity
will not be available to its stockholders for the foreseeable future.
On March 31, 1994, the bad debt reserves of the Bank for federal income tax
purposes included $16.0 million representing excess tax bad debt reserves. If,
in the future, amounts appropriated to these excess tax bad debt reserves are
used for the payment of dividends or other distributions by the Bank (including
distributions in dissolution, liquidation or redemption of stock), an amount
equal to the distribution plus the tax attributable thereto, but not exceeding
the aggregate amount of excess tax bad debt reserves, will generally be in-
cluded in the Bank's taxable income and be subject to tax. In addition, if in
the future the Bank fails to meet the definitional or other tests of a qualify-
ing association, the entire tax bad debt reserves of $52.5 million at March 31,
1994, will have to be recaptured and included in taxable income. Other than as
discussed under "Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations - Certain Affiliate
Transfers and Closing Adjustments," it is not contemplated that the accumulated
reserves will be used in a manner that will create such liabilities.
Enforcement. Whenever the OTS has reasonable cause to believe that the continu-
ation by a savings and loan holding company of any activity or of ownership or
control of any non FDIC-insured subsidiary constitutes a serious risk to the
financial safety, soundness, or stability of a savings and loan holding
company's subsidiary savings institution and is inconsistent with the sound op-
eration of the savings institution, the OTS may order the holding company, af-
ter notice and opportunity for a hearing, to terminate such activities or to
divest such noninsured subsidiary. FIRREA also empowers the OTS, in such a sit-
uation, to issue a directive without any notice or opportunity for a hearing,
which directive may (a) limit
127
<PAGE>
the payment of dividends by the savings institution, (b) limit transactions be-
tween the savings institution and its holding company or its affiliates, and
(c) limit any activity of the association that creates a serious risk that the
liabilities of the holding company and its affiliates may be imposed on the
savings institution.
In addition, FIRREA includes savings and loan holding companies within the cat-
egory of person designated as "institution-affiliated parties." An institution-
affiliated party may be subject to significant penalties and/or loss of voting
rights in the event such party took any action for or toward causing, bringing
about, participating in, counseling, or aiding and abetting a violation of law
or unsafe or unsound practice by a savings institution.
Limits on Change of Control. Subject to certain limited exceptions, control of
Fidelity may only be obtained with the approval (or in the case of an acquisi-
tion of control by an individual, the nondisapproval) of the OTS, after a pub-
lic comment and application review process. Under OTS regulations defining
"control," a rebuttable presumption of control arises if an acquiring party ac-
quires more than 10% of any class of voting stock of Fidelity (or more than 25%
of any class of stock, whether voting or non-voting) and is subject to any
"control factors" as defined in the regulation. Control is conclusively deemed
to exist if an acquirer holds more than 25% of any class of voting stock of Fi-
delity or Citadel, or has the power to control in any manner the election of a
majority of directors.
Any company acquiring control of Fidelity becomes a savings and loan holding
company, must register and file periodic reports with the OTS, and is subject
to OTS examination. With limited exceptions, a savings and loan holding company
may not directly or indirectly acquire more than 5% of the voting stock of an-
other savings and loan holding company or savings institution without prior OTS
approval.
Notification of New Officers and Directors. A savings and loan holding company
that has undergone a change in control in the preceding two years, is subject
to a supervisory agreement with the OTS, or is deemed to be in "troubled condi-
tion" by the OTS, must give the OTS 30 days' notice of any change to its Board
of Directors or its senior executive officers. The OTS must disapprove such
change if the competence, experience or integrity of the affected individual
indicates that it would not be in the best interests of the public to permit
the appointment. The OTS has taken action as a result of which Fidelity is
deemed to be in "troubled condition" for this purpose.
Classification of Assets
Savings institutions are required to classify their assets on a regular basis,
to establish appropriate allowances for losses and report the results of such
classification quarterly to the OTS. A savings institution is also required to
set aside adequate valuation allowances to the extent that an affiliate pos-
sesses assets posing a risk to the institution, and to establish liabilities
for off-balance sheet items, such as letters of credit, when loss becomes prob-
able and estimable. The OTS has the authority to review the institution's clas-
sification of its assets and to determine whether and to what extent (a) addi-
tional assets must be classified, and (b) the institution's valuation allow-
ances must be increased. See "Internal Asset Classifications."
Troubled assets are classified into one of three categories as follows:
SUBSTANDARD ASSETS. Prudent GVAs are required to be established for such
assets.
DOUBTFUL ASSETS. Prudent GVAs are required to be established for such as-
sets.
LOSS ASSETS. 100% of the amount classified as loss must be charged off, or
a specific allowance of 100% of the amount classified as loss must be es-
tablished.
GVAs for loan and lease losses are included within regulatory capital for cer-
tain purposes and up to certain limits, while specific allowances and other
general allowances are not included at all.
The OTS and the other federal banking agencies have adopted a statement of pol-
icy regarding the appropriate levels of GVA for loan and lease losses that in-
stitutions should maintain. Under the policy statement, examiners will gener-
ally accept management's evaluation of adequacy of GVAs for loans and lease
losses if the institution has maintained effective systems and controls for
identifying and addressing asset quality problems, analyzed in a reasonable
manner all significant
128
<PAGE>
factors that affect the collectability of the portfolio, and established an ac-
ceptable process for evaluating the adequacy of GVAs. However, the policy
statement also provides that OTS examiners will review management's analysis
more closely if GVAs for loan and lease losses do not equal at least the sum of
(a) 15% of assets classified as substandard, (b) 50% of assets classified as
doubtful, and (c) for the portfolio of unclassified loans and leases, an esti-
mate of credit losses over the upcoming twelve months based on the institu-
tion's average rate of net charge-offs over the previous two or three years on
similar loans, adjusted for current trends and conditions. The GVA policy
statement has had no material impact on Fidelity's results of operations or fi-
nancial condition.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") requires each savings institution, as
well as other lenders, to identify the communities served by the institution's
offices and to identify the types of credit the institution is prepared to ex-
tend within such communities. The CRA also requires the OTS to assess the per-
formance of the institution in meeting the credit needs of its community and to
take such assessment into consideration in reviewing applications for mergers,
acquisitions, and other transactions. An unsatisfactory CRA rating may be the
basis for denying such an application.
In connection with its assessment of CRA performance, the OTS assigns a rating
of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve," or "substantial noncom-
pliance." Based on an examination conducted during 1993, Fidelity was rated
satisfactory. The OTS and the other federal banking agencies have jointly pro-
posed amendments to their CRA regulations that would replace the current as-
sessment system, which is based on the adequacy of the processes an institution
has established to comply with the CRA, with a new system based on the institu-
tion's performance in making loans and investments and maintaining branches in
low- and moderate-income areas.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The Federal Home Loan Banks provide a credit facility for member institutions.
As a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, Fidelity is required to own capital
stock in the FHLB of San Francisco in an amount at least equal to the greater
of 1% of the aggregate principal amount of its unpaid home loans, home purchase
contracts and similar obligations at the end of each calendar year, assuming
for such purposes that at least 30% of its assets were home mortgage loans, or
5% of its advances from the FHLB of San Francisco. At March 31, 1994, Fidelity
was in compliance with this requirement with an investment in the stock of the
FHLB of San Francisco of $52.4 million. Long-term FHLB advances may be obtained
only for the purpose of providing funds for residential housing finance and all
FHLB advances must be secured by specific types of collateral.
Required Liquidity
OTS regulations require savings institutions to maintain, for each calendar
month, an average daily balance of liquid assets (including cash, certain time
deposits, bankers' acceptances, specified United States government, state and
federal agency obligations, and balances maintained in satisfaction of the FRB
reserve requirements described below) equal to at least 5% of the average daily
balance of its net withdrawable accounts plus short-term borrowings during the
preceding calendar month. The OTS may change this liquidity requirement from
time to time to an amount within a range of 4% to 10% of such accounts and
borrowings depending upon economic conditions and the deposit flows of member
institutions, and may exclude from the definition of liquid assets any item
other than cash and the balances maintained in satisfaction of FRB reserve re-
quirements. Fidelity's average regulatory liquidity ratio for the month of
March 1994 was 5.06%, and accordingly Fidelity was in compliance with the li-
quidity requirement. Monetary penalties may be imposed for failure to meet li-
quidity ratio requirements.
OTS regulations also require each member institution to maintain, for each cal-
endar month, an average daily balance of short-term liquid assets (generally
those having maturities of 12 months or less) equal to at least 1% of the aver-
age daily balance of its net withdrawable accounts plus short-term borrowings
during the preceding calendar month. The average short-term liquidity ratio of
Fidelity for the month of March 1994 was 1.52%.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
The FRB requires savings institutions to maintain noninterest-earning reserves
against certain of their transaction accounts (primarily deposit accounts that
may be accessed by writing unlimited checks) and non-personal time deposits.
For the
129
<PAGE>
calculation period including March 31, 1994, Fidelity was required to maintain
$33.5 million in noninterest-earning reserves and was in compliance with this
requirement. The balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed
by the FRB may be used to satisfy Fidelity's liquidity requirements discussed
above.
As a creditor and a financial institution, Fidelity is subject to certain reg-
ulations promulgated by the FRB, including, without limitation, Regulation B
(Equal Credit Opportunity Act), Regulation D (Reserves), Regulation E (Elec-
tronic Funds Transfers Act), Regulation F (limits on exposure to any one cor-
respondent depository institution), Regulation Z (Truth in Lending Act), Regu-
lation CC (Expedited Funds Availability Act), and Regulation DD (Truth in Sav-
ings Act). As creditors of loans secured by real property and as owners of
real property, financial institutions, including Fidelity, may be subject to
potential liability under various statute and regulations applicable to prop-
erty owners, generally including statutes and regulations relating to the en-
vironmental condition of the property.
GATEWAY
Gateway became an NASD-registered broker/dealer in October 1993 and offers se-
curities products, such as mutual funds and variable annuities, to customers
of the Bank. All securities transactions are executed and cleared by another
broker/dealer. Gateway does not maintain security accounts for customers or
perform custodial functions relating to customer securities.
The securities business is subject to regulation by the SEC, the NASD and
other federal and state agencies. Regulatory violations can result in the rev-
ocation of broker/dealer licenses, the imposition of censures or fines and the
suspension or expulsion from the securities business of a firm, its officers
or employees. With the enactment of the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud
Enforcement Act of 1988, the SEC and the securities exchanges have intensified
their regulation of broker/dealers, emphasizing in particular the need for su-
pervision and control by broker/dealers of their own employees.
As a broker/dealer registered with the NASD, Gateway is subject to the SEC's
uniform net capital rules, designed to measure the general financial condition
and liquidity of a broker/dealer. These rules require Gateway to maintain min-
imum net capital of $100,000 as of January 1, 1994, and do not permit Gate-
way's aggregate indebtedness to exceed eight times its net capital during its
first twelve months of operations. At March 31, 1994, Gateway's net capital
and required net capital were $400,906 and $100,000, respectively, and its ra-
tio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital was 179%. Under certain circum-
stances, these rules limit the ability of its stockholders to make withdrawals
of capital from Gateway. In addition, Gateway is required to file monthly re-
ports with the NASD and quarterly and annual reports with the NASD and SEC
containing detailed financial information with respect to its broker/dealer
operations.
PROPERTIES
The executive offices of Fidelity are located in the Glendale Building at 600
N. Brand Boulevard, Glendale, California 91203. This facility contains approx-
imately 90,000 square feet of office space including a branch banking facility
of approximately 12,000 square feet. Fidelity also owns an approximately
130,000 square feet facility located at 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles,
California 90039, which houses most of the administrative operations of Cita-
del and Fidelity. Present local zoning entitlements will allow for the con-
struction of an additional approximately 300,000 square feet of office space
plus parking on this 7.75-acre parcel. The potential for increasing the amount
of office space at this Los Angeles site would satisfy Fidelity's anticipated
facilities requirements for future years. The Glendale Building will be trans-
ferred to Citadel as part of the Restructuring. See "Restructuring and Recapi-
talization - Restructuring - Affiliate Transfers."
The aggregate net book value of all owned administrative facilities was ap-
proximately $25.9 million as of March 31, 1994. On March 31, 1994, Fidelity
owned 16 of its branch and/or loan office facilities having an aggregate net
book value of approximately $9.4 million, and leased the remaining 26 of its
branch and/or loan office facilities under leases with terms (including op-
tional extension periods) expiring from 1994 through 2050. The aggregate an-
nual rent under those leases as of March 31, 1994, was approximately $2.6 mil-
lion and the aggregate net book value of Fidelity's leasehold improvements as-
sociated with those leased premises was approximately $2.0 million. At March
31, 1994, Fidelity owned furniture, fixtures and equipment, related to both
owned and leased facilities, having a net book value of approximately $14.8
million.
130
<PAGE>
As a result of the January 1994 Northridge Earthquake, physical damage was sus-
tained at some of the Bank administrative and branch office facilities located
in the Los Angeles area; however, only one Bank-owned building, the Sherman
Oaks Building, sustained major damage. The Sherman Oaks Building will be trans-
ferred to Citadel as part of the Restructuring. It is estimated that necessary
repairs to all affected facilities, net of anticipated insurance reimbursement,
shall not exceed $0.5 million.
All owned office facilities are located in Southern California.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Bank has lawsuits pending against it in the ordinary course of business. As
of March 31, 1994, the Bank's management and its counsel believe that none of
the pending lawsuits or claims taken separately or together will have a materi-
ally adverse impact on the financial condition or the business of the Bank. In
addition, the Bank is named in certain legal proceedings that are in the very
early stages and the Bank therefore does not yet have sufficient information to
form a view with respect to the probable outcome or any potential exposure.
On March 4, 1994, Chase, one of four lenders under Fidelity's $60 million Sub-
ordinated Loan Agreement, sued Fidelity, Citadel and Citadel's Chairman of the
Board alleging, among other things, that the transfer of assets pursuant to the
restructuring would constitute a breach of the Subordinated Loan Agreement, and
seeking to enjoin the restructuring and to recover damages in unspecified
amounts. In addition, the lawsuit alleged that past responses of Citadel and
Fidelity to requests by Chase for information regarding the Restructuring vio-
late certain provisions of the Subordinated Loan Agreement and that such al-
leged violations, with the passage of time, have become current defaults under
the Subordinated Loan Agreement. Citadel and the Bank have entered into the
Settlement Agreement with the four lenders pursuant to which, among other
things, the Chase Lawsuit has been dismissed with prejudice. See "Restructuring
and Recapitalization - Restructuring - Redemption of Subordinated Debt."
The Bank is a defendant in three actions (one in Federal District Court and two
in Los Angeles Superior Court) which raise similar issues with respect to the
manner in which the Bank serviced certain adjustable rate mortgages which were
originated during the period 1983 through 1988. The plaintiffs' principal claim
is that the Bank selected a look-back or review date to review the index upon
which the rate adjustment is based that was one or two months further back than
what was required under the terms of the notes. In a declining interest rate
environment, the lag effect of a longer look-back period defers the benefit to
the borrower of such decline, and the reverse would be true in a rising inter-
est rate environment. The Bank strongly disputes these contentions and is vig-
orously defending these suits. The legal responsibility and financial impact
with respect to these suits cannot presently by ascertained and, accordingly,
there is a risk that the final resolution of one or more of these matters could
result in the payment of monetary damages which could be material in relation
to the financial condition or results of operations of the Bank. At this point,
the Bank does not believe the likelihood of such a result is probable and has
not established any specific litigation reserves with respect to such suits.
131
<PAGE>
DIVIDEND POLICY
Fidelity's ability to pay dividends on the Common Stock is limited by applica-
ble law. OTS regulations of general application impose limits upon certain cap-
ital distributions by savings institutions, including cash dividends, payments
to repurchase or otherwise to acquire an institution's shares, payments to
shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger and other distribu-
tions charged against capital. Because cash dividends reduce the regulatory
capital of the Bank, and because of the regulatory restrictions described
above, it is unlikely that the Bank will pay cash dividends on the Common Stock
in the foreseeable future.
Dividend distributions made to holders of the Common Stock in excess of the
Bank's current and accumulated earnings and profits, as well as any distribu-
tions in dissolution or in redemption or liquidation of stock, may result in
the recognition of some of the Bank's tax bad debt reserves into income, and
could result in additional tax liability to the Bank. This may have an adverse
effect on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends or to redeem stock.
Payment of dividends on the Common Stock of the Bank, including the Class A
Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby, is subject to the discre-
tion of its Board of Directors. Other than as discussed under "Certain Federal
Income Tax Considerations - Certain Affiliate Transfers and Closing Adjust-
ments," Fidelity currently has no plans to pay dividends on any of the Common
Stock, and no assurances can be given that Fidelity will pay any dividends in
the future.
132
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
CURRENT DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 1993,
with respect to the members of the Board of Directors of Fidelity.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST
BECAME
NAME OF DIRECTOR AGE DIRECTOR POSITION HELD WITH FIDELITY
---------------- --- -------- ---------------------------
<C> <C> <C> <S>
Richard M. Greenwood 46 1992 Director, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman
Donald R. Boulanger 49 1991 Director
Peter W. Geiger 67 1990 Director
Mel Goldsmith 66 1992 Director
Ralph B. Perry III 58 1985 Director
Zelbie Trogden 57 1993 Director
Alfred Villasenor, Jr. 64 1987 Director
</TABLE>
Set forth below is certain information concerning the principal occupation and
business experience of each of the individuals named above during the past five
years.
MR. GREENWOOD joined Citadel and Fidelity in June 1992 as President and Chief
Executive Officer of both Citadel and Fidelity and Chairman of the Board of Fi-
delity. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Chief Financial Officer of
CalFed, Inc. and California Federal Bank from 1990 to 1992. From 1988 to 1990,
Mr. Greenwood was Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Valley National Cor-
poration and Valley National Bank located in Phoenix, Arizona. Mr. Greenwood
served from 1978 to 1988 in various positions at Citicorp/Citibank, including
Vice President, Division Treasurer (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Senior
Vice President of Citicorp Homeowners' (a mortgage bank).
MR. BOULANGER has been President and a director of National Deposit Life Insur-
ance Company since 1989. National Deposit Life Insurance Company is a major
provider of corporate retirement plans. From 1983 to 1989, Mr. Boulanger was
Senior Vice President at Kaufman and Broad Corp. (now Broad, Inc.) where he was
responsible for a large life insurance holding company's investments.
MR. GEIGER is presently a financial and marketing consultant. He retired as
Vice President and Senior Account Officer of Bank of America where he served
from 1959 to 1990. His responsibilities at Bank of America included the devel-
opment, structuring, analysis and negotiation of large corporate financings for
major media and entertainment companies.
MR. GOLDSMITH has been a private real estate investor and a consultant to The
Decurion Corporation since 1984, advising company management concerning real
estate transactions, employee compensation and general operations.
MR. PERRY has been a partner of the law firm of Graven Perry Block Brody &
Qualls, a professional corporation, located in Los Angeles, California, since
1968. Graven Perry Block Brody & Qualls performs legal services for the Company
from time to time. See "Certain Transactions - Attorneys' Fees." Mr. Perry has
been a director of Craig Corporation ("Craig") since 1985 and a director of
Reading Company ("Reading") since 1988.
MR. TROGDEN was Senior Vice President of Bank of America in charge of providing
credit and banking services to the entertainment and media industries until his
retirement in June 1993. Prior to joining Bank of America, Mr. Trogden was em-
ployed in various positions with Security Pacific National Bank from 1960 until
the 1992 merger of Security Pacific and Bank of America.
MR. VILLASENOR has been President and the owner of Unisure Insurance Services,
Incorporated, a corporation specializing in life, business life and group
health insurance for over 30 years. Mr. Villasenor served on the Board of Di-
rectors of ELAR, a reinsurance company from 1990 to 1991.
133
<PAGE>
DIRECTORS AFTER THE CLOSING
Simultaneously with the Closing, all of the current members of the Board of Di-
rectors other than Messrs. Greenwood, Perry and Goldsmith will resign. The
Amended Charter of the Bank will provide that the Board of Directors of the
Bank will consist of between five and fifteen members, all of whom will be
elected by the holders of Class A Common Stock. The Amended and Restated Bylaws
of the Bank will set the initial number of members of the Board of Directors at
eight members. Fidelity will continue to have a classified board, approximately
one-third of the members of which will be elected each year to serve three-year
terms.
Citadel will elect certain identified directors immediately prior to the Clos-
ing, to take office at the Closing. As of the date of this Offering Circular,
the following individuals have been identified as prospective directors and
agreed to serve on the Board of Directors of the Bank from the Closing, subject
to OTS approval:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF PROPOSED DIRECTOR AGE POSITION HELD WITH FIDELITY
------------------------- --- -----------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Richard M. Greenwood(1) 46 Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Norman Barker, Jr.(3) 65 Chairman and Director
Waldo Burnside(3) 65 Director
Walter Gerkin(3) 71 Director
George Gibbs, Jr.(2) 64 Director
Mel Goldsmith(1) 66 Director
Lilly V. Lee(2) 64 Director
Ralph B. Perry III(1) 58 Director
</TABLE>
(1) To serve a one-year term
(2) To serve a two-year term
(3) To serve a three-year term
See "Current Directors" above for information regarding Mr. Greenwood's, Mr.
Perry's and Mr. Goldsmith's occupations and business experience. Set forth be-
low is certain information concerning the principal occupation and business ex-
perience of each of the other persons listed in the table above during the past
five years.
MR. BARKER is a former Chairman of the Board of First Interstate Bank of Cali-
fornia and is currently the Chairman of the Board of Pacific American Income
Shares. Mr. Barker also serves as a director of TCW Convertible Securities,
Inc., SCE Corp., American Health Properties, Inc., Automobile Club of Southern
California, SPI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
MR. BURNSIDE was a former director of Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. and Secu-
rity Pacific Corporation and an advisory director of BankAmerica Corporation.
Mr. Burnside currently serves as a member of the boards of a number of educa-
tional, charitable and municipal service organizations.
MR. GERKIN currently serves as Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board
of Directors of Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company. He joined Pacific Mutual
Life Insurance Company as a Financial Vice President in 1967 and served in var-
ious capacities until he was named Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in
1975. Mr. Gerkin served as Chief Executive Officer until 1986 and Chairman un-
til 1987. Mr. Gerkin is currently a director of SCE Corp. and a number of other
educational and charitable organizations.
MR. GIBBS is a principal and senior vice president of Johnson & Higgins, an in-
surance agency. Prior to joining Johnson & Higgins in 1987, he was with Stewart
Smith West for 33 years where he was the founding director of Associated Inter-
national Insurance Company and Calvert Insurance Company, two insurance compa-
nies organized by the Stewart Smith West organization. Mr. Gibbs currently
serves on the board of a number of educational and charitable trusts and foun-
dations.
134
<PAGE>
MS. LEE is the Chairman of the Board of Lilly International, Inc. and managing
partner of American Trade Development Co., an international trade and consult-
ing company. She is also a senior project consultant with Normart Enterprises,
Inc., serving 22 major corporations in the People's Republic of China. Ms. Lee
is a former director of CalFed Inc. and Trust Services of America and currently
serves as Chairman of the Board of the Thrift Depositor Protection - Regional
Oversight Board. Ms. Lee also serves on the board of a number of political, ed-
ucational, charitable and industry organizations.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Fidelity has standing Audit, Executive and Compensation and Stock Option Com-
mittees. All of the current members of each of these Committees (other than Mr.
Greenwood) will resign as of the Closing.
The Audit Committee's responsibilities are generally to assist the Board in
fulfilling its legal and fiduciary responsibilities relating to accounting, au-
dit and reporting policies and practices of Fidelity and its subsidiaries. The
Audit Committee also, among other things, recommends to the Board the engage-
ment of the Company's independent accountants; monitors and reviews the quality
and activities of the Company's internal audit function and those of its inde-
pendent accountants; and, monitors the adequacy of the Company's operating and
internal controls as reported by management, the independent accountants and
internal auditors.
The Executive Committee is empowered to exercise all authority in lieu of the
Board that may be exercised by a committee of the Board pursuant to applicable
law.
The Bank's Compensation and Stock Option Committee ("Compensation Committee")
is authorized to review salaries and compensation, including non-cash benefits,
of directors, officers and other employees of Fidelity and its subsidiaries and
to recommend to the Board salaries, remuneration and other forms of additional
compensation and benefits as it deems necessary.
In addition to the foregoing standing committees, Fidelity has an Interest Rate
Risk Management Committee, a Board Loan Committee and a Nominating Committee.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below are the current executive officers of the Bank (other than Mr.
Greenwood - see "Current Directors"), together with the positions currently
held by such persons.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION WITH FIDELITY OR SUBSIDIARY
---- --- -------------------------------------------
<C> <C> <S>
Diana E. Cookmeyer 45 Executive Vice President and Chief
Administrative Officer
Godfrey B. Evans 40 Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
James E. Stutz 50 Executive Vice President, Retail Banking
James F. Barnett III 30 Senior Vice President, Credit
Administration
Robert P. Condon 52 President and Chief Executive Officer of
Gateway Investment Services and Citadel
Service Corporation
Andre S.W. Shih 42 Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer
W.C. Taylor III 36 Senior Vice President, Residential
Production Manager, Acting Chief Lending
Officer
Charles N. Wagner 46 Senior Vice President, Internal Audit
Director
Heidi Wulfe 39 Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
J. Michael Malloy 36 Vice President, Special Assets Department
Manager, Acting Real Estate Asset Manager
</TABLE>
135
<PAGE>
MS. COOKMEYER joined Fidelity in April 1991. In her current capacity as Execu-
tive Vice President and Chief Administrive Officer, Ms. Cookmeyer manages the
Human Resources, MIS, Administrative Services, Marketing, and Business Excel-
lence functions of the Bank. Prior to joining Fidelity, she spent 17 years in
management and human resources consulting with such firms as McKinsey & Compa-
ny, Towers, Perrin, Forster and Crosby, and Coopers & Lybrand.
MR. EVANS joined Fidelity as Senior Vice President and Senior Corporate Counsel
in 1987 and in 1988 was appointed Senior Vice President and Senior Corporate
and Regulatory Counsel to both Citadel and Fidelity. In November 1989, Mr. Ev-
ans was named General Counsel of Citadel. In December 1990, Mr. Evans became
the Corporate Secretary of Citadel and Fidelity. Mr. Evans currently holds the
title of Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of
Fidelity. From 1982 to 1987, he was an attorney with the law firm of Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher, practicing in the areas of corporate, savings and loan and se-
curities law.
MR. STUTZ joined Fidelity in January 1994 as Executive Vice President, Retail
Banking. Prior to joining Fidelity, Mr. Stutz served since 1985 as Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Consumer Banking, of HomeFed Bank,
where he was responsible for a 215 branch network. Mr. Stutz was also Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Columbus Savings, a wholly-owned sub-
sidiary of HomeFed Corporation, where he was responsible for the consolidation
of several savings institutions and the subsequent merger of the company into
HomeFed Bank. Mr. Stutz served from 1971 until 1994 in various positions at
HomeFed Bank.
MR. BARNETT joined Fidelity in January 1992 as Senior Vice President and Inter-
nal Asset Review Manager. In February 1993, Mr. Barnett was appointed Senior
Vice President, Credit Administration. Prior to joining Fidelity, Mr. Barnett
was a Federal Thrift Regulator for the Office of Thrift Supervision between
1987 and 1991. He was responsible for the examination, supervision and problem
resolution for multi-billion dollar thrift institutions in the Western Region.
MR. CONDON joined Gateway as President and Chief Executive Officer in September
1993. Prior to joining Gateway, Mr. Condon served as General Manager of
WellPoint Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Blue Cross of California. Be-
fore that he was President and Chief Executive Officer of CalFed Investment
Services, in charge of the development and sale of alternative investment prod-
ucts through the bank branch network.
MR. SHIH joined Fidelity in July 1991 as Vice President, Director of Corporate
Development and Asset Liability Management. In December 1991, he was named Se-
nior Vice President. Prior to joining Fidelity, Mr. Shih was a principal of
Kesselman & Shih, a financial advisory firm, which he co-founded in 1990. From
1985 to 1990, Mr. Shih was Vice President at First Interstate Bank, where he
worked in the business analysis, internal consulting and financial analysis
areas.
MR. TAYLOR joined Fidelity in May 1993 as a Senior Vice President in charge of
loan originations. He spent one year as a Senior Vice President at Metrobank
Home Lenders and five years as a Senior Vice President of Metmor Financial be-
fore joining Fidelity. Prior to these experiences, Mr. Taylor worked for eight
years as a Group Vice President in Loan Servicing for Weyerhauser Mortgage Co.
MR. WAGNER joined Fidelity in August 1990 as a Senior Vice President of Inter-
nal Audit. Prior to joining Fidelity, he was a Vice President and General Audi-
tor of First Interstate Bank of Arizona for eight years. Mr. Wagner also served
as Vice President and Controller for Home Federal Savings and Loan of Arizona
for three years. Prior to his bank experience, he was a CPA for Ernst & Ernst
for five years.
MS. WULFE, a CPA, joined Fidelity and Citadel in 1989 as Vice President and
Controller, and in 1991 was named Senior Vice President. From 1987 to 1989, she
was Vice President and Controller at Antelope Valley Savings and Loan Associa-
tion. From 1977 to 1987, she was employed by Grant Thornton, Accountant and
Management Consultants, as an Audit Manager.
MR. MALLOY joined Fidelity in March 1993 as Vice President, Special Assets De-
partment Manager. Prior to joining Fidelity, Mr. Malloy worked in the real es-
tate functions at Great Western Bank, Gibraltar Savings, First Federal Savings,
and FCA American Mortgage Corporation.
136
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the compensation earned
during the three years ended December 31, 1993, by the Company's Chief Execu-
tive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers who
were serving as executive officers at December 31, 1993.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONG TERM
COMPENSATION
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
ANNUAL COMPENSATION OTHER ANNUAL STOCK OPTIONS ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION(1) GRANTED COMPENSATION(2)
- - - --------------------------- ---- -------- ------- --------------- ------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Richard M. Greenwood 1993 $376,846 $50,000 $39,359(3) 20,000 $ -
President and Chief 1992 $209,173 - 25,986(3) - -
Executive Officer 1991 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Walter H. Morris, Jr.(4) 1993 $178,500 $ - $ - - $ -
Executive Vice
President 1992 87,500 15,000 - - -
and Chief Lending
Officer 1991 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Andre S. W. Shih 1993 $134,847 $25,000 $ - - $ -
Senior Vice President, 1992 125,000 19,500 - - -
Treasurer and Acting
Chief 1991 55,289 - - - -
Financial Officer
Frederick N. Bailard(4) 1993 $132,692 $ - $ - - $1,171
Senior Vice President,
Real 1992 45,673 5,000 - - -
Estate Asset Management 1991 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Kirk S. Sellman(4) 1993 $137,308 $ - $ - - $4,269
Executive Vice
President, 1992 125,000 15,000 - - 3,351
Retail Banking 1991 115,500 5,563(5) - - -
</TABLE>
(1) Excludes perquisites if the aggregate amount thereof is less than $50,000,
or 10% of salary plus bonus, if less.
(2) Consists of matching contributions under the Company's 401(k) Plan.
(3) When Mr. Greenwood was hired on June 3, 1992, the Company agreed to make
him an interest free loan of $240,000 described below. The amount shown in-
cludes interest on such loan in 1993 of $9,984, an automobile allowance of
$20,040, an excess group life insurance policy for which Fidelity paid pre-
miums in the amount of $2,345 and other benefits.
(4) Mr. Morris resigned March 18, 1994. Mr. Bailard resigned February 2, 1994.
Mr. Sellman resigned January 3, 1994.
(5) Includes amounts earned under the Company's Management Incentive Compensa-
tion Plan with respect to each year in question, even if payment was made
in the following year.
Stock Options
Fidelity granted no stock options and no stock appreciation rights ("SARS") to
executives or employees during 1993. However, on March 24, 1993, Citadel
granted to Mr. Greenwood a stock option to purchase 20,000 shares of the common
stock of Citadel at a price of $21.90 per share. The following table sets forth
the outstanding stock options to purchase the common stock of Citadel held by
the named executive officers as of December 31, 1993. All options are exercis-
able. No SARs are outstanding.
Future Management Compensation
Following the Closing, management of the Bank intends to develop and seek ap-
proval from the Board of Directors of the Bank for an incentive compensation
program for the Bank's management. Management anticipates that the proposed
program will include, in lieu of direct cash bonuses, stock options, stock ap-
preciation rights or a stock bonus plan or similar features designed to provide
incentives for senior management to maximize shareholder value.
137
<PAGE>
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE AT
PERCENT OF ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES OF
NUMBER OF TOTAL STOCK PRICE APPRECIATION FOR
SECURITIES OPTIONS/SARS OPTION TERM
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO
OPTIONS/SARS EMPLOYEES IN EXERCISE OR EXPIRATION 5% 10%
NAME GRANTED FISCAL YEAR BASE PRICE DATE $35.67/SHARE $56.89/SHARE
- - - ---- ------------ ------------ ----------- ---------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Richard M. Greenwood 20,000 100% $21.90 2003 $713,400 $1,136,000
Walter H. Morris, Jr. - - - - - -
Andre S. W. Shih - - - - - -
Frederick N. Bailard - - - - - -
Kirk S. Sellman - - - - - -
</TABLE>
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
SHARES OPTIONS/SARS OPTIONS/SARS
ACQUIRED AT FY-END(#) AT FY-END(#)
NAME ON EXERCISE(#) VALUE REALIZED($) EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE
- - - ---- -------------- ----------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Richard M. Greenwood N/A N/A 20,000/0 0(1)
Walter H. Morris, Jr. - - - -
Andre S. W. Shih - - - -
Frederick N. Bailard - - - -
Kirk S. Sellman - - - -
</TABLE>
(1) None of the options held by Mr. Greenwood are in-the-money.
Retirement Income (Defined Benefit) Plan
Fidelity maintains a Retirement Income Plan which is a qualified, non-contribu-
tory defined benefit retirement plan. The Retirement Plan provides for monthly
retirement payments or an actuarially equivalent lump sum to or on behalf of
each covered employee or beneficiary upon retirement at age 65 or upon early
retirement (i.e., the attainment of age 55 and the completion of 10 years of
service) and, under certain circumstances, upon disability, death or other ter-
mination of employment, based upon the employee's average monthly compensation
and the aggregate number of years of service.
In March 1994, the Retirement Income Plan was suspended, thereby freezing bene-
fit levels and reducing related expense accruals by $1 million annually. Fidel-
ity also provides retiree medical benefits at substantially reduced premium
rates.
The following table illustrates approximate annual benefits payable at normal
retirement age for various combinations of service and compensation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------
YEARS OF SERVICE
AVERAGE FINAL COMPENSATION 15 20 25 30 35
-------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 50,000 11,302 15,069 18,836 22,603 26,370
100,000 24,427 32,569 40,711 48,853 56,995
150,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
200,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
250,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
300,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
350,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
400,000 37,552 50,069 62,586 75,103 87,620
</TABLE>
138
<PAGE>
Compensation under the Retirement Income Plan includes all regular pay, exclud-
ing overtime, commissions and bonuses, limited by IRC 401(a)(17) compensation
limit ($150,000 for 1994). The benefit amounts listed above were computed on a
10-year certain and life basis, which is the normal form under the plan.
The approximate years of credited service as of December 31, 1993, for each of
the named executive officers are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CREDITED
NAME SERVICE
---- YEARS
--------
<S> <C>
Richard M. Greenwood 1
Walter H. Morris, Jr. 1
Andre S. W. Shih 2
Kirk S. Sellman 3
Frederick N. Bailard 1
</TABLE>
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS
Mr. Greenwood and Fidelity entered into a three-year employment agreement as of
June 3, 1992, his date of hire. Mr. Greenwood's agreement with the Bank pro-
vides for compensation during the first twelve months at the rate of $365,000
per year, increasing to $385,000 for the second twelve months and $415,000 for
the third twelve months. In the event of termination by Fidelity other than for
"cause", or by Mr. Greenwood for "cause", Mr. Greenwood would be entitled to
receive, in addition to accrued benefits under any applicable benefits plans,
an amount equal to the sum of (i) the balance of the amount which would have
been paid to Mr. Greenwood had his employment continued through the remainder
of the twelve month period in which such termination occurred and (ii) $365,000
if such termination occurs during the first twelve months, $385,000 if such
termination occurs during the second twelve months, and $0 if such termination
occurs during the third twelve months of his employment. In the event of an
"Acquisition of Control" (as defined in the agreement) of the Bank by any per-
son other than Craig, Reading, Hecco Ventures I ("Hecco"), Tucson Electric
Power Company ("TEPC") or any one or more of their respective affiliates, Mr.
Greenwood would be entitled to receive additional severance compensation in the
amount of $500,000 during the first twelve months of his employment, reducing
to $250,000 and $0 for the second and third twelve months of his employment,
respectively. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank
has determined that this severance compensation is not payable in connection
with the Restructuring and Recapitalization. The terms of Mr. Greenwood's em-
ployment agreement may be subject to review by the new Board of Directors.
In March 1993, the Board of Directors approved entering into severance agree-
ments with Messrs. Sellman, Bailard and Morris under which Fidelity agreed to
pay each of them a sum equal to one year's salary and a severance agreement
with Mr. Shih under which Fidelity agreed to pay him a sum equal to nine
months' salary, if any of them are discharged or effectively discharged follow-
ing a "change in control" involving any person other than Craig, Reading,
Hecco, TEPC or one or more of their respective affiliates. The Board of Direc-
tors approved entering into the same or similar agreements with approximately
17 other key employees, 16 of whom are corporate officers. These 17 severance
agreements include six which agree to pay a sum equal to one year's salary, six
which agree to pay a sum equal to nine months' salary, and four which agree to
pay a sum equal to six months' salary. Fidelity currently has an aggregate po-
tential liability with respect to all such severance agreements equal to ap-
proximately $1.6 million. The Restructuring and Recapitalization would not
trigger a "change in control" requiring payment under these severance agree-
ments.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Messrs. Goldsmith, Perry and Villasenor currently serve as members of the Com-
pensation Committee of Fidelity, but will resign at the Closing. None of the
Committee members are employees of Fidelity, nor are they involved in any in-
terlocking directorships. Mr. Perry is a member of a law firm that provides le-
gal services to the Company. See "Certain Transactions." Mr. Greenwood serves
in an advisory capacity to the Compensation Committee.
139
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Through the Closing, nonemployee directors are paid fees in the amount of a
$23,000 annual retainer plus $1,000 for each board meeting and $850 for each
committee meeting attended in person (or $300 in the case of telephonic meet-
ings). In addition, Mr. Villasenor is paid $850 quarterly for his attendance at
the Fidelity CRA Committee meetings. Committee chairmen who are not Company em-
ployees receive an additional $2,500 per year. For directors who fail to attend
a meeting (unless excused for illness), the attendance fee for the ensuing 12
meetings is reduced by $100 per meeting. Failure to attend two or more meetings
reduces the attendance fee by $250 per meeting for the ensuing 12 meetings. Af-
ter the Closing, the compensation of the Bank's directors may be subject to re-
view.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
All of the outstanding stock of Fidelity is owned beneficially and of record by
Citadel.
Immediately following the Closing, Citadel will own all of the outstanding
shares of Class B Common Stock and the purchasers of the Class A and Class C
Common Stock offered hereby will own all of the outstanding shares of such
Classes. See "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Recapitalization."
140
<PAGE>
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
TRANSACTIONS WITH CITADEL
For a description of the transactions between Fidelity and Citadel contemplated
by the Restructuring, see "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Restructuring."
Citadel Indemnity
Fidelity has agreed to indemnify Citadel and certain related persons against,
and hold them harmless from, liabilities, costs and expenses incurred as a re-
sult of any claim or action brought by any stockholder of Fidelity after the
Form 10-K Filing Date, arising out of or in any way related to this offering or
any action or inaction of Fidelity after the Closing.
Administrative and Operational Services
Pursuant to the terms of a Service Agreement between Fidelity and Citadel, Fi-
delity has provided Citadel with all payroll, marketing, legal, management in-
formation services, accounts payable, human resources and general administra-
tive services for a fee equal to a pro rata share of Fidelity's overhead costs
and expenses associated with Bank employees who render such services to Citadel
plus a 10% profit margin. Citadel paid Fidelity $1.6 million under this Service
Agreement in 1993. It is anticipated that Fidelity will continue to provide
such administrative and operational services to Citadel pursuant to the terms
of this Service Agreement after the Closing, at least for a transitional
period.
Tax Sharing
The current tax sharing agreement between Citadel and Fidelity will be termi-
nated prior to the Closing. In connection with such termination, Citadel and
Fidelity will agree that certain amounts that would otherwise become payable by
Citadel to Fidelity under the terms of such agreement as a result of losses
recognized by Fidelity during the second quarter of 1994 will not be payable.
Prior to the Closing, Citadel and the Company expect to enter into a tax disaf-
filiation agreement (the "Tax Disaffiliation Agreement") which sets out each
party's rights and obligations with respect to deficiencies and refunds, if
any, of federal, state, local or foreign taxes for periods before and after the
Closing and related matters such as the filing of tax returns and the conduct
of Internal Revenue Service and other audits.
In general, under the Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, the Company will be respon-
sible for (i) all adjustments to the tax liability of the Company and its sub-
sidiaries for periods before the Closing relating to operations of the Company,
(ii) any tax liability of the Company and its subsidiaries for the taxable year
that begins before and ends after the Closing in respect of that part of the
taxable year through the end of the date of the Closing, and (iii) any tax lia-
bility of the Company and its subsidiaries for periods after the Closing. For
this purpose, any liability for taxes for periods ending on or before the Clos-
ing shall be measured by Citadel's actual liability for taxes after applying
tax benefits attributable to periods prior to the Closing otherwise available
to Citadel. The Company will be entitled to any refunds that relate to those
liabilities.
In general, Citadel will be responsible for all tax liabilities of Citadel and
its subsidiaries (other than the Company and its subsidiaries) for all periods.
Citadel will be entitled to any refunds that relate to those liabilities.
LOANS BY FIDELITY
Fidelity offers home loans to directors, officers and employees of Citadel and
Fidelity. These loans are made in the ordinary course of business and, in the
judgment of management, do not involve more than the normal risk of
collectibility. The loans are secured by real property and are made on substan-
tially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those pre-
vailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons.
However, pursuant to the provisions of Fidelity's employee loan program which
existed prior to the enactment of FIRREA, the interest rate generally charged
was one-half percent less than the rate for comparable transactions with non-
affiliated persons on fixed-rate loans and was one percent below the margin on
adjustable-rate loans. In addition, employees generally do not pay loan fees or
closing costs on their loans. The rate on these types of loans remains at the
reduced level only for so long as the individual obtaining the loan continues
to be employed by, or serves as a director of, Citadel or Fidelity. Since the
passage of FIRREA, the Federal Reserve Board regulations applicable to savings
institutions prohibit the making of preferential loans to directors and execu-
tive officers of Fidelity who perform policy-making functions. Accordingly, Fi-
delity no longer grants such loans to any director or any officer who influ-
ences corporate policy. Prior to the enactment of
141
<PAGE>
FIRREA, directors and executive officers with policy-making functions could
participate in Fidelity's employee loan program and to the extent they had
loans outstanding on the effective date of FIRREA's enactment, such loan have
grandfathered status.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
HIGHEST UNPAID
INDEBTEDNESS SINCE BALANCE AS OF INTEREST RATE AT
NAME DECEMBER 31, 1992 DECEMBER 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1993 YEAR MADE
- - - ---- ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Godfrey B. Evans $198,221 $194,416 5.103% 1987
Godfrey B. Evans $ 77,971 $ 76,950 7.0% 1989
S. Craig Tompkins $650,000(1) $646,430 7.75% 1993
</TABLE>
(1) This loan was sold to Residential Funding Corporation post-origination and
Fidelity continues to service the loan.
CITADEL LOAN TO CEO
As part of Mr. Greenwood's compensation package, Citadel extended an interest-
free loan to Mr. Greenwood in the amount of $240,000, payable on demand. The
loan was made principally to refinance a loan extended to Mr. Greenwood by his
previous employer, and Citadel agreed to reimburse Mr. Greenwood for interest
accrued on such refinanced loan in the amount of $8,965 from the date of his
employment with Fidelity until the new loan was made on October 27, 1992. In-
terest on such loan in the amount of $9,942 was imputed to Mr. Greenwood in
fiscal 1993. This loan is expected to be converted into a 2-year term loan at
or prior to the Closing.
ATTORNEYS' FEES
Graven Perry Block & Qualls performs legal services for the Company from time
to time. The Company paid that firm approximately $157,146 for such legal serv-
ices performed during 1993 and costs relating thereto. Mr. Perry, a director of
Fidelity, is a partner of that firm.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary description of the capital stock of Fidelity does not
purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the
provisions of the Existing Charter and Bylaws of the Bank, the proposed Amended
Charter and Bylaws of the Bank, the proposed Investors' Purchase Agreements and
the proposed Citadel Stockholders' Agreement, which documents will be filed as
exhibits to the Form OC of which this Offering Circular is a part.
EXISTING CHARTER OF THE BANK
Under the Existing Charter, the authorized capital stock of Fidelity consists
of 20 million shares of Existing Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, one
share of which is issued and outstanding, and 10 million shares of serial pre-
ferred stock ("Preferred Stock"), none of which is outstanding.
AMENDED CHARTER OF THE BANK
Effective upon the Closing of this offering, the Existing Charter will be
amended such that the authorized capital stock of Fidelity will consist of
shares of Class A Common Stock, shares of Class B Common Stock, shares
of Class C Common Stock, and shares of Preferred Stock. The holders of the
Common Stock of the Bank will have no preemptive or other subscription rights,
and there are no redemption or sinking fund applicable thereto.
Class A Common Stock
The holders of Class A Common Stock will have exclusive voting rights, except
as otherwise provided to the holders of the Class B Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock, and will be entitled to one vote per share on all matters requir-
ing stockholder action, including, but not limited to, the election of, and any
other matters relating to, directors.
The holders of Class A Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends pari
passu with the holders of Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock, out of
funds legally available therefor, subject to the restrictions of the Bank's
regulators and the payment of any preferential amounts of which any class of
stock having preferences over the Common Stock is entitled. See "Risk Factors -
Certain Considerations Relating to the Bank - Restrictions on Distributions."
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Bank, holders of Class A
Common Stock will be entitled to share ratably and pari
142
<PAGE>
passu with holders of Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock in all as-
sets remaining after the payment of all liabilities of the Bank and of any
preferential amounts of which any class of stock having preferences over the
Common Stock is entitled.
The Investors' Purchase Agreements to be executed by the purchasers of Class A
Common Stock will provide that holders of Class A Common Stock will not be per-
mitted to transfer their shares for a period of 30 days from the consummation
of this offering. In addition, following such 30 day period, the shares of
Class A Common Stock may be transferred only in blocks of 100,000 shares or
more until the Form 10-K Filing Date. During that time, the transfer agent will
refuse to issue stock certificates for fewer than 100,000 shares, except where
the transferor provides written certification that such smaller denominations
are being transferred only to the beneficial ownership of an affiliate of the
transferor or an investment account under the control of the transferor or an
affiliate of the transferor. After the Form 10-K Filing Date, all minimum block
size transfer restrictions will be eliminated.
All shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued in this offering will be duly
authorized and validly issued and, upon delivery and payment therefor in accor-
dance with the terms of this offering, will be fully paid and nonassessable.
Class B Common Stock
The holders of Class B Common Stock (initially Citadel) will be entitled to
limited voting rights. Holders of Class B Common Stock will be permitted to
vote only (i) with respect to any amendment, modification or waiver of the
Amended Charter that would adversely affect the rights of the Class B Common
Stock (including, without limitation, any increase or decrease in the percent-
age of shares of outstanding Class B Common Stock outstanding required to ap-
prove any such amendment, modification or waiver), in which case any such
amendment, modification or waiver will not be effective without the prior af-
firmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Class B Common Stock at the
time outstanding voting as a separate class and (ii) a merger or consolidation
of the Bank or a sale or exchange of all or substantially all of the assets of
the Bank, on which the holders of Class A Common Stock have the right to vote,
in which event the holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
will vote together as one class or (iii) as otherwise required by law.
The holders of Class B Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends pari
passu with the holders of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock, out of
funds legally available therefor, subject to the restrictions of the Bank's
regulators and the payment of any preferential amounts of which any class of
stock having preferences over the Common Stock is entitled. See "Risk Factors -
Certain Considerations Relating to the Bank - Restrictions on Distributions."
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Bank, holders of Class B
Common Stock will be entitled to share ratably and pari passu with holders of
Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock in all assets remaining after the
payment of all liabilities of the Bank and of any preferential amounts of which
any class of stock having preferences over the Common Stock is entitled.
Upon the sale or transfer of any shares of Class B Common Stock by Citadel to
any person that is not an affiliate of Citadel, such transferred shares will
automatically be converted into shares of Class A Common Stock. Upon any public
or private sale of shares of Class B Common Stock, as a condition to the con-
version of such shares into shares of Class A Common Stock Citadel will be re-
quired to certify that, to the best of its knowledge, the transferee is not af-
filiated with Citadel. In addition, any outstanding shares of Class B Common
Stock will automatically be converted into shares of Class A Common Stock if
such outstanding shares represent less than 10% of the total outstanding Common
Stock of Fidelity on a fully-diluted basis. The conversion rate for the Class B
Common Stock will be one-to-one, subject to customary anti-dilution adjust-
ments.
Pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement to be entered into between the Bank
and Citadel at the Closing, Citadel and any person who acquires shares of Class
B Common Stock or Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the shares
of Class B Common Stock (the "Registrable Securities") will be entitled to cer-
tain registration rights with respect to such shares, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Registration Rights Agreement. At any time on or after Janu-
ary 1, 1995, and before January 1, 1998, the holder or holders of more than 50%
of the Registrable Securities may require the Bank to register all or a portion
of the Registrable Securities under OTS regulations, subject to certain re-
strictions, provided that no registration statement filed by the Company pursu-
ant to any such demand shall become effective prior to the Form 10-K Filing
Date. No more than three demands may be made pursuant to such registration
rights. Furthermore, if,
143
<PAGE>
at any time after the Closing and before January 1, 1998, the Bank proposes to
register any of its Common Stock under the OTS regulations for purposes of an
offering or sale in a primary or secondary offering, the Bank may be required
to include any or all shares of Registrable Securities as directed by the hold-
ers thereof. Subject to certain limitations, the Bank is required to bear all
registration and selling expenses in connection with the registration of the
Registrable Securities.
The Citadel Stockholders' Agreement will provide restrictions on the transfers
of shares of Class B Common Stock. Except pursuant to the exercise of its reg-
istration rights described above, no holder of Class B Common Stock may sell
publicly shares of Class B Common Stock representing more than 5% of the total
outstanding Common Stock of the Bank on a fully-diluted basis during any 30-day
period without the prior approval of the Board of Directors of the Bank. In ad-
dition, if shares of Class B Common Stock representing more than 5% of the to-
tal outstanding Common Stock of the Bank on a fully-diluted basis are proposed
to be sold privately to any person or, if after giving effect to such private
sale, the transferee (including any of the transferee's affiliates or any
"group" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of which the trans-
feree is a member) would own more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock of
the Bank on a fully diluted basis, then except in connection with distributions
by Citadel of such shares to its stockholders, Fidelity will have an assignable
right of first refusal with respect to the shares of Class B Common Stock pro-
posed to be sold. If, immediately following any distribution of Class B Common
Stock by Citadel to its stockholders, by dividend or otherwise, any Citadel
stockholder or "group" (as so defined) of which such stockholder is a member
holds shares of Class B Common Stock representing more than 5% of the total
outstanding Common Stock of the Bank, the number of shares of Class B Common
Stock representing the excess over 5% shall not be converted into shares of
Class A Common Stock upon such distribution.
In addition, for a period commencing six months after the Closing and ending 18
months after the Closing, Fidelity will have the right to redeem, subject to
the approval of the OTS, any outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock owned
by Citadel or its affiliates (each a "Citadel Person"), in excess of the number
of shares of Common Stock held by the then largest stockholder of the Bank
(other than Citadel), at a redemption price (the "Redemption Price") equal to
either (a) 110% of the market price of the Class A Common Stock, assuming it is
then listed on a national securities exchange or admitted for quotation on the
NASDAQ, or (b) if the Class A Common Stock is not so listed or quoted, 100% of
the book value per share of all Common Stock as of the most recent quarterly
balance sheet date; provided that no such redemption shall be made in anticipa-
tion of any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of
Fidelity's assets, distribution (other than any ordinary cash dividend), or any
other transaction involving the receipt by holders of any class of Common Stock
of any cash or other property. Fidelity will be required to notify each Citadel
Person holding shares of Class B Common Stock of its intention to exercise such
right to redeem the shares. After receiving such notice, such Citadel Person
will have the option to distribute any or all of the shares of Class B Common
Stock it owns to its stockholders, in which case Fidelity will redeem only the
shares of Class B Common Stock, if any, not so distributed by such Citadel Per-
son.
The shares of Class B Common Stock into which the Existing Common Stock will be
reclassified at the Closing will be duly authorized, validly issued and fully
paid and nonassessable.
Class C Common Stock
The holders of Class C Common Stock will be entitled to no voting rights, ex-
cept that they will be permitted to vote (i) with respect to any amendment,
modification or waiver of the Amended Charter of the Bank that would adversely
affect the rights of the Class C Common Stock (including, without limitation,
any increase or decrease in the percentage of shares of outstanding Class C
Common Stock outstanding required to approve any such amendment, modification
or waiver), in which case any such amendment, modification or waiver will not
be effective without the prior affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the Class C Common Stock at the time outstanding voting as a separate class, or
(ii) as otherwise required by law.
The holders of Class C Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends pari
passu with the holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, out of
funds legally available therefor, subject to the restrictions of the Bank's
regulators and the payment of any preferential amounts of which any class of
stock having preferences over the Common Stock is entitled. See "Risk Factors -
Certain Considerations Relating to the Bank - Restrictions on Distributions."
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Bank, holders of Class C
Common Stock will be entitled to share ratably and pari passu with holders of
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock in all assets remaining after the
payment of all liabilities of the Bank and of any preferential amounts of which
any class of stock having preferences over the Common Stock is entitled.
144
<PAGE>
Holders of Class C Common Stock will be granted certain "piggyback" registra-
tion rights.
Resales and other transfers of the Class C Common Stock will be subject to the
same restrictions applicable to the Class A Common Stock. See "Class A Common
Stock." However, Class C Common Stock will be convertible by a transferee into
Class A Common Stock only in connection with the following transfers: (i) in a
public offering registered with the OTS;(ii) if the holder makes reasonable
efforts to prevent the sale to any single person or group of persons acting in
concert a number of shares of Class C Common Stock that, if converted, would
constitute 2% of the then outstanding Class A Common Stock; (iii) upon the ad-
vice of counsel to such holder that such sale is permitted under the laws and
regulations applicable to such holder; or (iv) in a single transaction to a
third party who acquires at least a majority of the Class A Common Stock (in-
cluding Class A Common Stock issuable on conversion of Class B Common Stock
and Class C Common Stock) without regard to the transfer of such Class C Com-
mon Stock.
All shares of Class C Common Stock to be issued in this offering will be duly
authorized and validly issued and, upon delivery and payment therefor in ac-
cordance with the terms of this offering, will be fully paid and nonassess-
able.
Preferred Stock
Subject to the approval of the Bank's regulators, the Board of Directors is
authorized, without further action by Fidelity's stockholders, to issue Pre-
ferred Stock from time to time in one or more series and to fix, as to any
such series, the voting rights, if any, applicable to such series and such
other designations, preferences and special rights as the Board of Directors
may determine, including dividend, conversion, redemption and liquidation
rights and preferences. There are no shares of Preferred Stock outstanding.
The issuance of shares of Preferred Stock under certain circumstances could
have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Fidelity or
other corporate actions.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for the Class A Common Stock and Class C Com-
mon Stock is First Interstate Bank of California.
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE; TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS
After the consummation of this offering, the Bank will have outstanding
20,952,381 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock (assuming
that Fidelity does not accept any subscriptions for the Additional Shares),
and 6,595,624 shares of Class B Common Stock, subject to reduction as de-
scribed under "Restructuring and Recapitalization - Recapitalization - Closing
Adjustment." Except as provided below, all Class A Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock may be resold without restrictions. Under the terms of the In-
vestors' Purchase Agreements, the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C
Common Stock may not be transferred for a period of 30 days following the con-
summation of this offering. In addition, following such 30 day period, the
shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock may be transferred
only in blocks of 100,000 shares or more until the Form 10-K Filing Date. Dur-
ing that time, the transfer agent will refuse to issue stock certificates for
fewer than 100,000 shares except where the transferor provides written certi-
fication that such smaller denominations are being transferred only to the
beneficial ownership of an affiliate of the transferor or an investment ac-
count under the control of the transferor or an affiliate of the transferor.
After the Form 10-K Filing Date, all minimum block size transfer restrictions
will be eliminated. The Class C Common Stock will be convertible into Class A
Common Stock only in connection with certain transfers. See "Description of
Capital Stock - Amended Charter of the Bank - Class C Common Stock."
The shares of Class B Common Stock may be sold pursuant to a registration
statement filed and declared effective by the OTS or an exemption from regis-
tration requirements of the rules and regulations of the OTS. See "Description
of Capital Stock - Amended Charter - Class B Common Stock" for a description
of the registration rights and the restrictions upon transfer of Class B Com-
mon Stock. Subject to such restrictions on transfer, holders of Class B Common
Stock may also be able to resell such shares under 12 C.F.R.
(S). 563g.1(a)(14) and the interpretations thereunder.
None of the Bank's Common Stock initially will be listed on any national secu-
rities exchange or quoted on NASDAQ, and there is no public market for the
Common Stock. Because of the restrictions on transfer on the Common Stock and
because the distribution of Common Stock contemplated hereby will be made to a
limited number of institutional investors, only a very limited trading market
(if any) in the Common Stock is expected to develop in the foreseeable future.
145
<PAGE>
The Placement Agent does not currently intend to make a market in any of the
Bank's Common Stock. However, the Placement Agent has advised the Bank that it
may provide certain services to investors who maintain or establish an account
with the Placement Agent, which may, but is not obligated to, assist such in-
vestors desiring to sell their Common Stock. The Placement Agent, acting as
agent of persons who desire to buy or sell shares of the Common Stock, will
make reasonable attempts to match any buy order it receives with any sell or-
der it receives, at specified prices (or within specified price ranges) only,
but will not solicit any sell orders for the Common Stock.
To facilitate such transactions, the Placement Agent has advised the Bank that
it will make available upon request information as to recent sales prices, but
will not set the price at which Common Stock will be sold. Since this arrange-
ment will not constitute a market for the securities, no "market orders" or
"stop orders" will be accepted by the Placement Agent. Accordingly, it is pos-
sible that no buy orders will be received by the Placement Agent at the prices
specified in the sell orders that the Placement Agent receives, and in that
case it will not be possible for the Placement Agent to match any transac-
tions. For its services in acting as agent for the buyer and seller in such
transactions, the Placement Agent will charge a fee or commission. Further in-
formation about this service can be obtained from the Placement Agent. The
Placement Agent is under no obligation to provide this service to investors in
the Common Stock, and this service may be discontinued or suspended at any
time without notice.
Unless and until the Class A Common Stock or Class C Common Stock is listed on
a national exchange or an active public market develops for it, the Placement
Agent intends to report the offering price of the shares offered hereby as the
respective value of the Common Stock for purposes of statements relating to
accounts maintained by their respective customers, if any, unless the Place-
ment Agent otherwise has reason to believe that there has been a material
change in the value of the Class A Common Stock or Class C Common Stock. Dur-
ing such period, the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock or Class C
Common Stock may vary from the price so reported. The reporting by any broker-
dealers other than the Placement Agent may be different.
CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following summary describes certain United States federal income tax con-
sequences of the Restructuring and the Recapitalization. In general, this sum-
mary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date
hereof (the "Code"), administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and ex-
isting and proposed Treasury Regulations, changes to any of which subsequent
to the date of this offering Circular may affect the tax consequences de-
scribed herein. With respect to certain issues discussed below, there are no
judicial or administrative authorities that are directly on point. This sum-
mary is therefore based, in part, upon the best judgment as to how the current
authorities would be applied to such issues. Furthermore, Fidelity has not
sought, nor does it intend to seek, a ruling from the Service with respect to
any of the matters summarized in this discussion.
SEVERAL LIABILITY FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX
The common parent and each subsidiary that joined in the filing of a consoli-
dated return are severally liable for the consolidated federal income tax, in-
cluding deficiencies. A member cannot deny liability on the ground that it was
a member for only part of the tax year or that it sustained a net operating
loss ("NOL") for the year. Such liability is not extinguished upon separation
of any of the members of the group or by agreements made between members of
the group. Thus, although Fidelity will cease to be a member of the Citadel
consolidated group as a result of the Recapitalization, Fidelity will remain
severally liable for the federal income tax of the Citadel consolidated group
for those tax years during which it was a member of the Citadel consolidated
group at any time. Fidelity will indemnify Citadel against any federal income
tax liabilities attributable to Fidelity's operations prior to the Closing.
CERTAIN AFFILIATE TRANSFERS AND CLOSING ADJUSTMENTS
As part of the Restructuring, Fidelity will distribute the Office Buildings
and the D&O Litigation to Citadel at or prior to the Closing. Although the tax
treatment of the distributions are subject to some uncertainty, Fidelity plans
to treat the distributions as distributions to stockholders for federal income
tax purposes. As a result of the distributions, Fidelity will recognize gain
equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Office Buildings over
Fidelity's tax basis in the Office Buildings, and will recognize gain equal to
the excess of the fair market value of the D&O Litigation claims over
Fidelity's tax basis in the D&O Litigation claims.
146
<PAGE>
Pursuant to the closing adjustments described under "Restructuring and Recapi-
talization - Recapitalization - Closing Adjustments," Fidelity will be obli-
gated to make the Adjustment Payment to Citadel in the event that the Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity of Fidelity exceeds $86 million. Although the tax treat-
ment of any such Adjustment Payment is subject to some uncertainty, Fidelity
plans to treat such payment as a distribution to holders of the Class B Common
Stock for federal income tax purposes.
If the fair market value of the Office Buildings, the D&O Litigation claims
plus the cash (if any) distributed with respect to the Adjustment Payment ex-
ceeds Fidelity's current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess
amount plus the tax attributable thereto, will generally be included in
Fidelity's taxable income and subject to tax as required by Section 593(e).
(See generally the discussion under "Business - Taxation.") The amount of
Fidelity's current and accumulated earnings and profits at the time of such
distributions will depend upon the results of Fidelity's operations during 1994
and the results of the Bulk Sales. As a result, it is uncertain whether the
amount distributed will exceed Fidelity's current and accumulated earnings and
profits.
LIMITATION ON LOSSES
Section 382 and the temporary Treasury Regulations generally provide that, fol-
lowing an ownership change of a corporation with NOLs or a net unrealized
built-in loss (a "NUBIL"), the amount of annual post-ownership change taxable
income that can be offset by pre-ownership change NOLs or recognized built-in
losses generally cannot exceed a limitation prescribed by Section 382. The Sec-
tion 382 annual limit equals the product of the fair market value of the equity
of the corporation immediately before the ownership change (subject to various
adjustments) and the long-term tax-exempt rate prescribed monthly by the Serv-
ice.
As a result of the Recapitalization, Fidelity will undergo an ownership change
and will cease to be a member of the Citadel consolidated group. It is possible
that Fidelity will incur a NOL for its 1994 taxable year that is subject to
limitation under Section 382. It is also possible that Fidelity has a NUBIL at
the time of the Recapitalization. If it is determined that Fidelity has a NUBIL
at the time of the Recapitalization, any portion of the NUBIL recognized during
the 5-year period following the Recapitalization will be subject to limitation
under Section 382.
BULK SALE
Pursuant to Section 267 of the Code and the temporary Treasury Regulations
thereunder, when a member of a consolidated group sells an asset to another
member and recognizes a loss and, thereafter such selling member ceases to be a
member of the consolidated group and the purchasing member continues to hold
the property, the loss is not taken into account by the selling member but,
rather, the tax basis of the property in the hands of the purchasing member is
increased by the amount of the deferred loss.
Citadel may acquire certain assets in the Citadel Bulk Sale. If the Citadel
Bulk Sale occurs simultaneously with or prior to the offering of the Class A
Common Stock and Class C Common Stock made hereby, any losses recognized by Fi-
delity in connection with the Citadel Bulk Sale will be subject to the rules
described in the preceding paragraph. If, however, the Citadel Bulk Sale is
subject to recently proposed Treasury Regulations, or the Citadel Bulk Sale oc-
curs following the completion of the offering of the Class A Common Stock and
the Class C Common Stock, any recognized losses will be taken into account by
Fidelity.
POTENTIAL RECAPTURE OF EXCESS TAX BAD DEBT RESERVE
Prior to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 ("1986 Act"), many quali-
fying institutions, including Fidelity, used the percentage of taxable income
method which generally resulted in a lower effective federal income tax rate
than that applicable to other types of corporations. However, the 1986 Act re-
duced the maximum percentage that could be deducted under the percentage of
taxable income method from 40% to 8% for the tax years beginning after December
31, 1986; thus many qualifying institutions, including Fidelity, began to use
the experience method beginning in 1987. The amount by which a qualifying in-
stitution's total bad debt reserves exceed the amount computed under the expe-
rience method (the "excess tax bad debt reserves") may be subject to recapture
as noted below.
On March 31, 1994, the bad debt reserves of Fidelity for federal income tax
purposes included approximately $16 million representing excess tax bad debt
reserves. (See generally the discussion under "Business - Taxation.") If, in
the future,
147
<PAGE>
amounts appropriated to these excess tax bad debt reserves are used for the
payment of dividends or other distributions by Fidelity with respect to the
Class A, Class B and Class C Common Stock (including distributions in dissolu-
tion, liquidation or redemption of stock), an amount equal to the distribution
plus the tax attributable thereto, but not exceeding the amount of excess tax
bad debt reserves, will generally be included in Fidelity's taxable income and
be subject to tax. In addition, if in the future Fidelity fails to meet the
definitional or other tests of a qualifying institution, the entire tax bad
debt reserves ($52.5 million at March 31, 1994) will have to be recaptured and
included in taxable income. Other than as discussed above under "Certain Fed-
eral Income Tax Considerations - Certain Affiliate Transfers and Closing Ad-
justments," it is not contemplated that the accumulated reserves will be used
in a manner that will create such tax liabilities.
Based upon actual operations through March 31, 1994, projected operations for
the remainder of the calendar year and consummation of the Restructuring con-
templated herein it is anticipated that the recapture of the tax bad debt
reserve, if any, resulting from the distribution of the Office Buildings, the
D&O Litigation and the cash (if any) with respect to the Adjustment Payment
will not have an impact on the financial statements of the Bank. Tax liabili-
ties resulting from the potential tax bad debt recapture would be offset by tax
benefits from actual and projected operations and consummation of the Restruc-
turing which would not otherwise be recognized under current accounting stan-
dards.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
J.P. Morgan has agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of the Agency
Agreement entered into between it, on the one hand, and the Bank and Citadel,
on the other hand, to act as Placement Agent in connection with the sale of the
shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby and, in
such capacity, to use its "best efforts" to solicit the purchase of such
shares. The Placement Agent is not obligated to purchase any shares itself. The
Placement Agent and the Bank will each have the right in its sole discretion to
reject any offer to purchase any shares. The Placement Agent will receive for
each share sold by it a placement agency fee as set forth on the cover page of
this Offering Circular. In addition, the Placement Agent will receive the Suc-
cess Fee equal to 1% of the price of each share sold in this offering, net of a
credit for prior retainer payments of $250,000. See "Use of Proceeds."
In addition, the Bank has indicated to the Placement Agent that the Bank may
accept subscriptions for the Additional Shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock on the same terms as set forth in this Offering Circular
at any time prior to the Closing.
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the Class A Common
Stock or Class C Common Stock. The initial public offering price was determined
through negotiations between the Bank and the Placement Agent. Numerous factors
were considered in determining such offering price, including the history, fi-
nancial condition and business prospects for the Bank, current market condi-
tions for similar financial institutions, the projected impact of the Restruc-
turing and Recapitalization and general market conditions.
Under the terms of the Investors' Purchase Agreements to be executed by pro-
spective purchasers, the shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common
Stock offered hereby are subject to certain restrictions on transfers. See
"Shares Eligible for Future Sale; Transfer Restrictions." It is anticipated
that only a very limited market (if any) for the Class A Common Stock and Class
C Common Stock will develop. The Placement Agent does not currently intend to
make a market in the Common Stock but has advised the Bank that it will provide
certain services to investors who maintain an account with the Placement Agent,
which may, but is not obligated to assist investors desiring to sell their Com-
mon Stock.
The Bank has agreed to indemnify the Placement Agent against certain civil lia-
bilities under the Securities Act in connection with this offering. If the Bank
fails to satisfy such indemnity, Citadel has agreed, under certain circumstanc-
es, to satisfy such indemnity. The Placement Agent may be deemed to be an "un-
derwriter" for purposes of the Securities Act in connection with this offering.
Under the terms of the Investors' Purchase Agreements, each purchaser will ir-
revocably commit to purchase a specified number of shares of Class A Common
Stock or Class C Common Stock. The aggregate price to be paid by an investor
for
148
<PAGE>
shares will be set forth in the Investors' Purchase Agreements, the per unit
prices are the same for all investors and are set forth on the cover page of
this Offering Circular. Such commitments will be submitted to the Bank together
with all other commitments obtained by the Placement Agent. Each commitment un-
der an executed Investors' Purchase Agreement will be irrevocable and binding
until the earlier of (i) the time the Bank expressly rejects such commitment;
and (ii) , 1994.
The offering is being conducted without the requirement that potential purchas-
ers of shares put their purchase prices in escrow prior to the Closing. No pro-
visions have been made for the receipt and safekeeping of any such purchase
price prior to the actual closing for the sale of the Class A Common Stock or
Class C Common Stock. INVESTORS ARE ADVISED NOT TO SEND ANY FORM OF PAYMENT TO
EITHER THE PLACEMENT AGENT OR THE BANK PRIOR TO THE TIME THAT THEY ARE ADVISED
THAT SUCH PAYMENT IS REQUIRED. ANY PAYMENTS RECEIVED PRIOR TO THAT TIME WILL BE
RETURNED TO THE INVESTOR.
The offering is being conducted on a best efforts basis and will terminate no
later than , 1994.
The Bank and Citadel have engaged J.P. Morgan to act as their financial advisor
in connection with the development of various strategic alternatives, including
(i) this offering and (ii) the Bulk Sales. In such capacity, J.P. Morgan has
assisted in evaluating the most effective means of selling the Bank and has
provided certain other services in connection therewith. J.P. Morgan has also
advised the Bank and Citadel on the financial impact of this offering and the
Restructuring on the Bank from a financial point of view and has discussed
other possible effects of this offering and the Restructuring. J.P. Morgan was
engaged because of its general experience and expertise in the banking indus-
try. As part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan evaluates securi-
ties of banks, bank holding companies, thrifts and other financial institutions
in connection with acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary distribu-
tions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for
various other purposes.
Under its engagement letters with the Bank and Citadel, the Bank has agreed to
pay to J.P. Morgan various customary fees for its services, such as the Success
Fee. In addition, the Bank has agreed to pay to J.P. Morgan a selling commis-
sion in connection with the Bulk Sales. J.P. Morgan also will be reimbursed for
its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, not to exceed certain specified limits
in the aggregate, incurred in connection with its services, including reason-
able attorneys' fees and disbursements and will be indemnified by the Bank
against certain liabilities under the securities laws.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters in connection with the sale of the shares of Class A Com-
mon Stock and Class C Common Stock offered hereby will be passed upon for Fi-
delity by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, California. Davis Polk & Ward-
well, New York, New York, is acting as counsel for J.P. Morgan in connection
with certain legal matters relating to the shares of Class A Common Stock and
Class C Common Stock offered hereby.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 1993 and 1992, and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1993, included in this
Offering Circular, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche, independent audi-
tors, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an un-
qualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding an uncer-
tainty as to the consummation of the Restructuring and Recapitalization, as
discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements; and a second ex-
planatory paragraph regarding an uncertainty of the Bank's ability to meet pre-
scribed capital requirements in the future and the impact that might result
from the failure to do so as discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements), and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm
given their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
149
<PAGE>
GLOSSARY
Additional Shares The additional 1,047,619 shares of Class A
Common Stock and Class C Common Stock for which
the Bank may accept subscriptions.
Adjustment Payment The payment to be made by Fidelity to Citadel
under the closing adjustment if the Adjusted
Stockholders' Equity of the Bank exceeds $86
million.
Affiliate Transfers A series of transactions, the primary compo-
nents of which are (i) the sale by Citadel to
Fidelity of all of the outstanding capital
stock of Gateway for cash, (ii) the transfer of
the D&O Litigation, and (iii) the transfer of
the Office Buildings by Fidelity to Citadel and
the leaseback thereof to Fidelity.
Allowance for estimated loan
and real estate losses GVA plus specific reserves.
Amended Charter of the Bank The Amended and Restated Charter S of the Bank
to become effective at the Closing.
ARM Adjustable rate mortgage loan.
Bank or Fidelity Fidelity Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank,
and its subsidiaries.
Branch Profit The net profit (after consideration of applica-
ble taxes), if any, that the Bank would realize
upon the sale of the Specified Branches for the
prices set forth in the Branch Purchase Agree-
ments, determined in accordance with GAAP.
Branch Purchase Agreements The definitive purchase agreements to be en-
tered into for all or any of the Specified
Branches.
Bulk Sale Agreements Two or more definitive purchase and sale agree-
ments and related documents pursuant to which
Fidelity will sell to third parties in two or
more separate Bulk Sales certain problem and
other assets of the Bank.
Bulk Sale Assets The assets to be sold pursuant to the Bulk Sale
Agreements.
Bulk Sales Two or more separate sales of certain problem
and other assets of the Bank, including the
REMIC Transaction.
Chase Lawsuit The lawsuit filed against the Bank, Citadel and
Citadel's Chairman of the Board by The Chase
Manhattan Bank, N.A., a lender under the Subor-
dinated Loan Agreement.
Citadel Citadel Holding Corporation, a Delaware corpo-
ration and currently the parent of the Bank and
Gateway.
Citadel Assets The four properties to be sold by Fidelity to
Citadel in the Citadel Bulk Sale.
Citadel Bulk Sale The Bulk Sale of the Citadel Assets from Fidel-
ity to Citadel and the financing thereof by Fi-
delity.
Citadel Stockholders' The Stockholders' Agreement to be entered into
Agreement by Citadel and Fidelity.
Class A Common Stock The Class A Common Stock of the Bank, $0.01 par
value per share.
Class B Common Stock The Class B Common Stock of the Bank, $0.01 par
value per share.
Class C Common Stock The Class C Common Stock of the Bank, $0.01 par
value per share.
Classified assets NPAs and all other assets designated by the
Bank as "Loss," "Doubtful" or "Substandard."
Closing The closing of this offering.
150
<PAGE>
COFI The 11th District Cost of Funds Index of the
FHLB of San Francisco.
Common Stock The Class A, Class B and Class C Common Stock.
Company The Bank, its subsidiaries and Gateway.
Criticized assets Classified assets and other assets designated
by the Bank as "Special Mention."
D & O Litigation Certain litigation claims by Fidelity to be
transferred to Citadel in the Restructuring.
Earthquake Accommodation Loans of the Bank as to which the Bank agreed
Loans to defer all or any portion of any monthly pay-
ments as a direct consequence of the January
1994 Northridge earthquake.
Earthquake TDR Pool An identified pool of loans affected by the
January 1994 Northridge earthquake with a net
book value of $26.5 million.
Exchange Act Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Existing Charter The existing Charter S of the Bank.
Existing Common Stock The existing common stock of the Bank, $0.01
par value, which is currently owned by Citadel.
FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
FDICIA The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Im-
provement Act of 1991.
FHLB A Federal Home Loan Bank.
FIRREA The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery,
and Enforcement Act of 1989.
Form 10-K Filing Date The date of the filing by the Bank of its an-
nual report on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 1994.
FRB The Federal Reserve Board.
GAAP Generally accepted accounting principles.
Gateway Gateway Investment Services, Inc., an NASD
broker/dealer.
Glendale Building The Office Building located at 660 N. Brand
Boulevard in Glendale, California.
GVA General valuation allowance for loan and real
estate losses.
Investors' Purchase The Investors' Purchase Agreement to be exe-
Agreement cuted by the purchasers of Class A Common Stock
and Class C Common Stock.
ISF In-substance foreclosed loans.
J.P. Morgan J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
NASD National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc.
NASDAQ National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. Automated Quotation System.
NPAs Nonperforming assets, which include nonaccruing
loans and REO, but do not include TDRs, unless
they fall into one of the foregoing categories.
NPLs Nonperforming loans.
Office Buildings The Glendale Building and the Sherman Oaks
Building.
OTS Office of Thrift Supervision.
PCA The "prompt corrective action" regulations
promulgated by the OTS.
151
<PAGE>
Placement Agent J.P. Morgan, in its capacity as Placement
Agent.
Primary Bulk Sale The Bulk Sale or series of Bulk Sales (includ-
ing the REMIC Transaction) designed to dispose
of certain assets with a net book value as of
March 31, 1994 of approximately $396 million.
Primary Bulk Sale Assets The assets to be sold in the Primary Bulk Sale.
Recapitalization The sale of the Class A Common Stock and Class
C Common Stock offered hereby, together with
the reclassification of the Bank's Existing
Common Stock into shares of Class B Common
Stock.
Recapitalization Fee The fee to be paid by the Bank to the four
lenders under the Subordinated Loan Agreement
in connection with the Settlement Agreement.
Recourse Representations Certain representations and warranties in the
Bulk Sale Agreements concerning the environmen-
tal and structural condition of REO or the
properties underlying mortgage loans.
REMIC The real estate mortgage investment conduit to
which a portion of the Primary Bulk Sale Assets
may be transferred.
REMIC Agreements The agreements relating to the REMIC Transac-
tion.
REMIC Assets Primary Bulk Sale Assets that may be sold in
the REMIC Transaction.
REMIC Transaction The sale of a portion of the Primary Bulk Sale
Assets to the REMIC and the related private
placement of securities by the REMIC.
REO Real estate owned - real estate acquired in
settlement of loans by foreclosure or otherwise
and, prior to 1994, ISF.
Restructuring The REMIC Transaction, the other Bulk Sales (at
the prices set forth in the Bulk Sale Agree-
ments), the redemption of the Subordinated
Notes and the Affiliate Transfers.
Restructuring Adjustment The adjustment to unaudited stockholders' eq-
uity of the Bank as ofJune 30, 1994, in connec-
tion with the calculation of Adjusted Stock-
holders' Equity of the Bank.
SAIF Savings Association Insurance Fund.
Secondary Bulk Sale The second Bulk Sale or series of Bulk Sales
designed to dispose of certain assets with a
net book value as of March 31, 1994, of approx-
imately $94 million.
Secondary Bulk Sale Assets The assets to be sold in the Secondary Bulk
Sale.
Securities Act The Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Service The Internal Revenue Service.
Settlement Agreement The settlement agreement dated as of June 3,
1994, entered into by the Bank, Citadel and the
four lenders under the Subordinated Loan Agree-
ment.
Sherman Oaks Building The Office Building located at 14455 Ventura
Boulevard, Sherman Oaks, California.
Specified Branches The branch properties and deposits of the Bank,
together with related cash, equipment and other
assets, subject to sale pursuant to the Branch
Purchase Agreements.
Specific reserves or specific Specific loss reserves for assets, or portions
loss reserves thereof, classified as "loss."
Subordinated Loan Agreement The Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of May
15, 1990, among Citadel and Fidelity, on the
one hand, and four lenders, on the other hand.
Subordinated Notes Subordinated notes with a principal amount of
$60 million issued under the Subordinated Loan
Agreement.
Success Fee The additional 1% of the gross proceeds to be
paid to J. P. Morgan pursuant to one of the en-
gagement letters.
Troubled debt restructurings.
TDRs
152
<PAGE>
ANNEX A
FORM OF INVESTORS' PURCHASE AGREEMENT
TO COME
A-1
<PAGE>
INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT F-2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder's Equity F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-8
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors and Stockholder
Fidelity Federal Bank, F.S.B.
Glendale, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition
of Fidelity Federal Bank, F.S.B. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Citadel Holding
Corporation, "Citadel") and subsidiaries (the "Bank") as of December 31, 1993
and 1992, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder's
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1993. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Bank's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Fidelity Federal Bank, F.S.B. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 1993 and 1992 and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1993 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, in June 1994,
the Bank, Citadel and the Bank's subordinated lenders entered into a settlement
agreement in which a lawsuit seeking to enjoin the Bank's restructuring plan
will be dismissed with prejudice, permiting Fidelity, subject to certain
conditions, to redeem the subordinated notes and to terminate the subordinated
loan agreement. However, if the "Restructuring and Recapitalization" is not
consummated, it may have an impact on the settlement agreement, the capital
position of the Bank, cross default provisions under the Bank's other debt
agreements and the guarantee by Citadel. Accordingly, no adjustments that may
result from the ultimate resolution of this uncertainty have been made in the
accompanying financial statements.
As discussed in Notes 14 and 17 to the financial statements, the Bank is
subject to numerous regulatory requirements, including, among others: (i)
minimum capital to be considered "adequately capitalized" under the Prompt
Corrective Action provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act ("FDICIA") as implemented by the Office of Thrift Supervision
("OTS"), and (ii) minimum capital requirements of the OTS. Although the Bank
met these capital requirements at December 31, 1993, the Bank's ability to meet
the prescribed capital requirements in the future is uncertain. Failure on the
part of the Bank to meet these capital requirements may subject the Bank to
significant regulatory sanctions. Management's immediate plans to address these
capital requirements are described in Note 14. The financial statement impact,
if any, that might result from the failure of the Bank to comply with the
capital requirements prescribed by the OTS cannot presently be determined.
Accordingly, no adjustments that may result from the ultimate resolution of
this uncertainty have been made in the accompanying financial statements.
Deloitte & Touche
February 4, 1994, except for Paragraph 6 of Note 14 and Note 17,
as to which the date is June 20, 1994
Los Angeles, California
F-2
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) ----------- ----------- ----------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Cash, federal funds sold and other cash
equivalents (Note 2) $ 90,805 $ 142,853 $ 110,055
Investment securities available for sale
(March 31, 1994 at market value; market
value of $92,512 at December 31, 1993)
(Notes 2 and 10) 95,601 92,259 --
Investment securities held to maturity, at
amortized cost (market value of
$69,041)(Notes 2 and 10) -- -- 67,337
Mortgage-backed securities available for
sale (amortized cost of $48,248 at March
31, 1994; market value of $91,298 at
December 31, 1993)(Note 3) 48,298 91,108 --
Mortgage-backed securities, at amortized
cost (market value of $230,561)
(Notes 3 and 10) -- -- 230,384
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or
market (Note 4) 190,088 367,688 26,482
Loans receivable, net of allowances of
$91,368, $83,832 and $64,277 at
March 31,1994, December 31, 1993 and
1992, respectively
(Notes 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10) 3,359,503 3,344,363 3,963,967
Interest receivable (Notes 2, 3 and 4) 23,457 23,049 27,132
Investment in FHLB and FRB stock (Note 9) 52,626 52,151 50,574
Owned real estate (Notes 5 and 6) 138,657 153,607 133,255
Premises and equipment, net 52,188 49,226 46,569
Intangible assets, net (Note 7) 1,813 2,098 20,556
Deferred tax assets (Note 12) -- -- 2,995
Other assets (Note 12) 61,472 65,577 16,212
---------- ----------- ----------
$4,114,508 $4,383,979 $4,695,518
========== =========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY:
Liabilities:
Deposits (Note 8) $3,171,306 $3,368,664 $3,459,648
FHLB Advances (Note 9) 342,700 326,400 581,400
Commercial paper (Note 10) 254,000 304,000 65,000
Mortgage-backed notes and bonds (Note 10) 100,000 100,000 262,000
Other borrowings (Note 10) -- 3,830 --
Deferred tax liabilities (Note 12) 5,124 14,789 2,258
Other liabilities (Notes 11 and 12) 14,451 24,012 45,041
Subordinated notes (Notes 10, 17 and 18) 60,000 60,000 60,000
---------- ----------- ----------
3,947,581 4,201,695 4,475,347
---------- ----------- ----------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Stockholder's equity (Note 14):
Serial preferred stock, par value $.01
per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares;
no shares outstanding -- -- --
Common stock, par value of $.01 per
share; authorized, 20,000,000 shares;
1 share issued and outstanding -- -- --
Paid-in capital 70,689 70,689 42,689
Unrealized loss on securities available
for sale (1,206) -- --
Retained earnings (Note 12) 97,444 111,595 177,482
---------- ----------- ----------
166,927 182,284 220,171
---------- ----------- ----------
$4,114,508 $4,383,979 $4,695,518
========== =========== ==========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------
FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands) (UNAUDITED)
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans $ 60,728 $73,338 $ 269,712 $355,546 $497,005
Mortgage-backed securi-
ties 1,165 3,426 11,051 5,631 6,016
Investment securities
and other 2,181 1,423 8,568 9,538 17,031
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total interest income 64,074 78,187 289,331 370,715 520,052
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits 28,566 33,296 131,721 175,077 278,776
FHLB Advances 3,266 5,144 17,077 20,878 43,024
Other borrowings 4,993 9,124 32,323 36,259 47,541
Subordinated notes 1,843 1,843 7,373 7,910 9,173
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total interest expense 38,668 49,407 188,494 240,124 378,514
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
NET INTEREST INCOME 25,406 28,780 100,837 130,591 141,538
Provision for estimated
loan losses (Notes 4
and 6) 15,600 7,500 65,100 51,180 49,843
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
NET INTEREST INCOME WITH
PROVISION FOR ESTIMATED
LOAN LOSSES 9,806 21,280 35,737 79,411 91,695
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
NONINTEREST INCOME
(EXPENSE):
Loan and other fee in-
come 1,198 2,018 5,389 7,885 5,869
Gains (losses) on sales
of loans, net (2,804) 395 194 1,117 2,118
Fee income from invest-
ment products 591 -- -- 2,606 2,487
Fee income on deposits
and other income (ex-
pense) 907 789 3,271 4,406 (3,351)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(108) 3,202 8,854 16,014 7,123
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Provision for estimated
real estate losses
(Notes 5 and 6) (4,300) (1,000) (30,200) (17,820) (7,537)
Direct costs of real es-
tate operations, net
(Note 5) (2,057) (3,318) (18,643) (4,441) (2,060)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(6,357) (4,318) (48,843) (22,261) (9,597)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Gains (losses) on sales
of mortgage-backed se-
curities, net (Note 3) (621) -- 1,342 -- 8,993
Gains (losses) on sales
of investment securi-
ties, net (Note 2) 329 -- (38) -- 1
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(292) -- 1,304 -- 8,994
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total noninterest
income (expense) (6,757) (1,116) (38,685) (6,247) 6,520
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
OPERATING EXPENSE:
Personnel and benefits 12,560 10,524 44,266 36,277 35,694
Occupancy 3,495 2,982 13,086 12,678 12,583
FDIC insurance 2,482 1,887 8,628 8,391 8,680
Professional services 3,112 1,510 11,351 5,598 5,973
Office-related expenses 1,656 1,283 6,449 4,914 5,072
Marketing 648 683 2,753 2,548 3,130
Amortization of intangi-
bles (Note 7) 7 118 9,246 596 840
Other general and admin-
istrative 865 700 2,953 4,042 3,843
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating expense 24,825 19,687 98,732 75,044 75,815
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE
INCOME TAXES (21,776) 477 (101,680) (1,880) 22,400
Income tax expense (ben-
efit) (Note 12) (7,625) 271 (35,793) (2,167) 14,296
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
NET EARNINGS (LOSS) $(14,151) $ 206 $ (65,887) $ 287 $ 8,104
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 AND THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994
COMMON STOCK UNREALIZED LOSS
---------------------- ON SECURITIES TOTAL
NUMBER OF PAR PAID-IN AVAILABLE FOR RETAINED STOCKHOLDER'S
SHARES VALUE CAPITAL SALE EARNINGS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands) --------- --------- --------- --------------- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 1991 1 $ -- $42,689 -- $171,166 $213,855
Net earnings for 1991 -- -- -- -- 8,104 8,104
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31,
1991 1 -- 42,689 -- 179,270 221,959
Dividend of Gateway
Investment Services to
Citadel Holding
Corporation -- -- -- -- (1,075) (1,075)
Dividend paid to Citadel
Holding Corporation -- -- -- -- (1,000) (1,000)
Net earnings for 1992 -- -- -- -- 287 287
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31,
1992 1 -- 42,689 -- 177,482 220,171
Capital contribution
from Citadel Holding
Corporation -- -- 28,000 -- -- 28,000
Net loss for 1993 -- -- -- -- (65,887) (65,887)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31,
1993 1 -- 70,689 -- 111,595 182,284
Unrealized loss on secu-
rities available for
sale (Unaudited) -- -- -- (1,206) -- (1,206)
Net loss for the first
quarter of 1994
(Unaudited) -- -- -- -- (14,151) (14,151)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 1994
(UNAUDITED) 1 $ -- $70,689 $(1,206) $97,444 $166,927
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------ ---------------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991
(Dollars in thousands) -------------- -------------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS--OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings (loss) $ (14,150) $ 206 $ (65,887) $ 287 $ 8,104
Reconciliation of net
earnings (loss) to net
operating cash flows:
Provisions for esti-
mated losses 19,900 8,500 95,300 69,079 57,572
(Gains) losses on sales
of loans and securi-
ties 3,096 (395) (1,498) (1,117) (11,112)
Capitalized loan origi-
nation costs (538) (365) (2,187) (3,001) (2,450)
Amortization of de-
ferred loan items, net (537) 3 (1,163) (604) (1,057)
Purchases of investment
securities held for
trading -- (248,272) -- --
Proceeds from sales of
investment securities
held for trading -- 248,248 -- --
Investment securities
available for sale
lower of cost or mar-
ket adjustment -- 2,074 -- --
Principal repayments of
mortgage-backed secu-
rities ("MBS") held
for trading -- (51,248) -- --
Proceeds from sales of
MBS held for trading -- 51,277 -- --
Originations of loans
held for sale (43,643) (16,017) (162,868) (176,219) (354,365)
Proceeds from sales of
loans held for sale 207,973 3,556 138,399 204,831 282,728
FHLB stock dividend (467) -- (1,640) (790) (3,070)
Depreciation and amor-
tization 1,675 2,217 23,085 9,344 10,079
Interest receivable,
net (increase) de-
crease (408) 1,767 4,083 9,975 7,849
Other assets (increase)
decrease 1,985 (1,306) (50,652) 4,006 11,971
Deferred income tax ex-
pense (benefit) (9,665) (473) 15,526 (19,150) (16,538)
Interest payable in-
crease (decrease) 5,994 3,746 (5,102) (6,426) 19,920
Other liabilities and
deferred income, net
increase (decrease) (15,800) (5,591) (15,245) (16,583) (19,054)
Other, net 155 (149) 88 (139) (4,386)
------------- ------------- --------- --------- ---------
155,570 (4,301) (27,682) 73,493 (13,809)
------------- ------------- --------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS--INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of investment
securities available
for sale (5,074) -- (420,921) -- --
Maturities of investment
securities available
for sale -- -- 260,816 -- --
Proceeds from sales of
investment securities
available for sale -- -- 76,674 -- --
Purchases of investment
securities held to ma-
turity -- -- (200,055) (170,539) (184,572)
Maturities of investment
securities held to ma-
turity -- 30,000 226,617 137,237 277,105
Proceeds from sales of
securities held to ma-
turity -- -- 26,908 -- 1,547
Purchases of MBS avail-
able for sale (54,812) -- (395,561) -- --
Principal repayments of
MBS available for sale 3,953 -- 58,865 -- --
Proceeds from sales of
MBS available for sale 93,552 -- 463,704 -- --
Purchases of MBS held to
maturity -- -- -- (92,502) --
Principal repayment of
MBS held to maturity -- 5,537 9,565 8,588 9,724
Proceeds from sales of
MBS held to maturity -- -- 7,114 -- 273,098
Purchases of loans (770) -- (3,951) (1,675) (2,939)
Loans receivable, net
(increase) decrease (15,138) 23,836 153,229 273,121 285,092
Real estate investment
dispositions, net (609) 3,197 (270) -- --
Proceeds from sales of
real estate 7,426 7,132 41,608 27,957 6,237
Premises and equipment
additions, net (1,257) (1,160) (6,933) (2,445) (5,318)
Other, net -- (1,035) 225 (8,374) 3,812
------------- ------------- --------- --------- ---------
27,271 67,507 297,634 171,368 663,786
------------- ------------- --------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS--(CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------ -------------------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991
(Dollars in thousands) -------------- -------------- --------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS--FINANCING AC-
TIVITIES:
Demand deposits and pass-
book savings, net in-
crease (decrease) $ 28,240 $ (15,357) $(113,311) $ 87,107 $ 368,082
Certificate accounts, net
increase (decrease) (225,599) (151,355) 22,327 (513,320) (452,796)
Proceeds from FHLB ad-
vances 50,000 105,000 250,000 1,273,400 860,000
Repayments of FHLB ad-
vances (33,700) (215,000) (505,000) (1,017,000) (1,290,000)
Repayment of subordinated
notes -- -- -- (15,000) --
Short-term borrowings,
net increase (decrease) (53,830) 307,117 242,830 61,800 (12,390)
Repayments of long-term
borrowings -- -- (162,000) (265,950) (35,626)
Dividends paid to Citadel
from the subsidiaries -- -- -- (1,000) --
Capital contribution from
Citadel -- 18,000 28,000 -- --
------------- ------------- --------- ----------- -----------
(234,889) 48,405 (237,154) (389,963) (562,730)
------------- ------------- --------- ----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease)
in cash and cash equiva-
lents (52,048) 111,611 32,798 (145,102) 87,247
Cash and cash equivalents
at beginning of period 142,853 110,055 110,055 255,157 167,910
------------- ------------- --------- ----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents
at end of period $ 90,805 $ 221,666 $ 142,853 $ 110,055 $ 255,157
============= ============= ========= =========== ===========
CASH FLOWS--SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) dur-
ing the period for:
Interest on deposits,
advances and other
borrowings $ 32,136 $ 43,495 $ 180,861 $ 237,135 $ 368,895
Income taxes (1,796) -- (754) 21,601 30,053
Noncash transactions:
Additions to real estate
acquired through fore-
closures 38,133 39,422 193,641 121,192 49,951
Loans originated to fi-
nance sale of real es-
tate owned 4,947 3,739 51,607 11,243 1,604
Transfers from loan and
investment portfolio to
held for sale:
Loans receivable -- -- 325,222 -- --
Investment securities -- -- 14,264 -- --
Mortgage-backed securi-
ties -- -- 214,310 -- --
Mortgage loans exchanged
for MBS -- -- -- 114,277 235,758
Dividend of Gateway
Investment Services,
Inc. to Citadel Holding
Corporation -- -- -- 1,075 --
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Fidelity Federal
Bank, a Federal Savings Bank and its subsidiaries. Fidelity Federal Bank, a
Federal Savings Bank ("Fidelity" or the "Bank") is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Citadel Holding Corporation ("Citadel"). All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have
been made to prior years' consolidated financial statements to conform to the
1993 presentation.
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Financial Information
In the opinion of the Bank, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments (consisting of various normal accruals)
necessary to present fairly its financial position, its results of operations
and its cash flows. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years'
consolidated financial statements to conform to the 1994 presentation. The
results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 1994, are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the
entire year of 1994.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on
hand, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds
are sold for one-day periods. Fidelity is required by the Federal Reserve
System to maintain noninterest-earning cash reserves against certain of its
transaction accounts. At December 31, 1993, the required reserves totaled $28.6
million including vault cash.
Investment Securities and Mortgage-backed Securities
In May 1993, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." This Statement addresses the
accounting and reporting for investments in equity securities that have readily
determinable fair values and for all investments in debt securities. Those
investments are to be classified in three categories and accounted for as
follows: (a) debt securities for which the enterprise has the positive intent
and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity securities
and reported at amortized cost; (b) debt and equity securities that are bought
and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term are classified
as trading securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and
losses included in earnings; and (c) debt and equity securities not classified
as either held to maturity securities or trading securities are classified as
available for sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains
and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of
stockholders' equity. SFAS No. 115 does not apply to unsecuritized loans.
However, after mortgage loans are converted to mortgage-backed securities, they
are subject to its provisions. The Bank implemented SFAS No. 115 as of January
1, 1994 and there was no material financial impact upon adoption. Any gains or
losses incurred on sales of securities are calculated based upon the specific
identification method.
Prior to January 1, 1994, Securities held for investment are those securities
which the Bank has the intent and ability to hold until maturity, and are
carried on an amortized cost basis. Securities to be held for indefinite
periods of time, including securities that management intends to use as part of
its asset/liability strategy, or that may be sold in response to changes in
interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory
capital or other similar factors, are classified as held for sale and are
carried at the lower of cost or market value. Any investment securities held
for trading are carried at market value.
Loans
Interest on loans is credited to income as earned and is accrued only if deemed
collectible. Accrued interest is fully reserved on loans over 90 days
contractually delinquent and on other loans which have developed inherent
problems prior to being 90 days delinquent. Discounts and premiums on purchased
loans are included with loans receivable and are credited or charged to
operations over the estimated life of the related loans using the interest
method. The Bank charges fees for originating loans. Loan origination fees for
loans held for investment, net of certain direct costs of originating the loan,
are recognized as an adjustment of the loan yield over the life of the loan by
the interest method, which results in a constant rate of return. When a loan is
sold, net, loan origination fees and direct costs are recognized in operations.
Other loan fees and charges representing service costs for the prepayment of
loans, for delinquent payments or for miscellaneous loan services are
recognized when collected. Loan commitment fees received are deferred to the
extent they exceed direct underwriting costs. For loans originated
F-8
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES--(CONTINUED)
and held for sale, the basis includes the origination fees and direct costs
which are capitalized and netted in computing the gain or loss on sale.
In May 1993, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No.
114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan." This statement
prescribes the recognition criteria for loan impairment and the measurement
methods for certain impaired loans and loans whose terms are modified in
troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs"). SFAS No. 114 states that a loan is
impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all
principal and interest amounts due according to the contracted terms of the
loan agreement. A creditor is required to measure impairment by discounting
expected future cash flows at the loan's effective interest rate, or by
reference to an observable market price, or by determining the fair value of
the collateral for a collateral dependent asset. The statement also clarified
the existing accounting for in-substance foreclosures ("ISFs") by stating that
a collateral dependent real estate loan would be reported as real estate owned
("REO") only if the lender had taken possession of the collateral. The
statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1994. Earlier application is encouraged.
Additionally, in June 1993, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Reserve Board and Office of
Thrift Supervision issued a Joint Statement providing interagency guidance on
the reporting of ISFs. This Joint Statement lent support to SFAS No. 114,
further clarifying that losses must be recognized on real estate loans that
meet the existing ISF criteria based on fair value of the collateral, but such
loans need not be reported as REO unless possession of the underlying
collateral has been obtained.
Management implemented SFAS No. 114 in the first quarter of 1994. The Bank
already measures impairment based on the fair value of the collateral,
therefore, the estimated impact of application will consist of a
reclassification of ISFs on the statement of financial condition from REO to
loans. At December 31, 1993, the amount of ISFs totaled $28.4 million.
The Bank has designated certain of its loans receivable as being held for sale.
In determining the level of loans held for sale, the Bank considers whether
loans (a) would be sold as part of its asset/liability strategy, or (b) may be
sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, the
need to increase regulatory capital or other similar factors. Such loans are
classified as held for sale and are carried at the lower of cost or market
value.
The Bank's current policy is to designate substantially all originations of
fixed rate residential 1 to 4 unit loans as being held for sale as part of the
asset/liability strategy. In further compliance with the Bank's policy, $321
million of adjustable FHLB Eleventh District Cost of Funds Index ("COFI") loans
were transferred from held to maturity to available for sale in December 1993
as part of the Bank's asset/liability strategy and the possible need to
increase regulatory capital in the future. Loans held for sale are valued at
the lower of aggregate cost or market value as determined by outstanding
commitments from investors or, in the absence of such commitments, the current
investor yield requirements calculated on an aggregate loan basis. The market
value calculation includes consideration of commitments and related fees.
Adjustments to the lower of cost or market are charged to current operations
and are included in net gains/losses on loan sales in the statement of
operations.
Fidelity has sold loans which have generated gains on sale, a stream of loan
servicing revenue and cash for lending or liquidity. Sales of loans are
dependent upon various factors, including interest rate movements, investor
demand for loan products, deposit flows, the availability and attractiveness of
other sources of funds, loan demand by borrowers and liquidity and capital
requirements. Due to the volatility and unpredictability of these factors, the
volume of Fidelity's sales of loans has fluctuated. All loans sold during 1993
and 1992 were from the held for sale portfolio. Fidelity has the intent and
ability to hold all of its loans, other than those designated as held for sale,
until maturity.
Owned Real Estate
Real estate held for sale acquired in settlement of loans generally results
when property collateralizing a loan is foreclosed upon or otherwise acquired
by the Bank in satisfaction of the loan. Real estate acquired through
foreclosure is recorded at the lower of fair value, less cost to dispose or the
recorded investment in the loan satisfied at the date of foreclosure. Such
writedowns to fair
F-9
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES--(CONTINUED)
value are recorded to the allowance for estimated loan losses. Fair value is
based on the amount that the Bank could reasonably expect to receive for the
asset in a current sale between a willing buyer and a willing seller, that is,
other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Inherent in the computation of
estimated fair value are assumptions about the length of time the Bank may have
to hold the property before disposition. The holding costs through the expected
date of sale and estimated disposition costs are included in the valuations.
Real estate held for investment or development is carried at the lower of cost
or fair value. Adjustments to the carrying value of the assets are made through
valuation allowances and charge-offs, through a charge to operations. Net cash
receipts on real estate owned or on those loans designated as in-substance
foreclosures and net cash payments are recorded in real estate operations on
specific properties.
Prior to implementing SFAS No. 114 in the first quarter of 1994, loans meeting
certain criteria were accounted for as "in-substance foreclosures." These
substantially foreclosed assets were recorded at the lower of the loan's
carrying amount or at the estimated fair value of the collateral at the date
the loan was determined to be in-substance foreclosed. These assets were
reported as "real estate owned" in addition to formally foreclosed real estate.
Statement of Position ("SOP") 92-3, "Accounting for Foreclosed Assets," was
issued by the Accounting Standards Division of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants in April 1992 and became effective for the Bank's
December 31, 1992 financial statements. SOP 92-3 presumes that foreclosed
assets are held for sale and not for the production of income. It requires the
Bank to carry foreclosed assets held for sale, after foreclosure, at the lower
of (a) fair value minus estimated costs to sell or (b) cost. The impact of
implementing SOP 92-3 was immaterial to the Bank's financial position, due to
the Bank's policy of carrying foreclosed assets at fair value, net of
disposition costs.
Allowance for Estimated Losses on Loans and Real Estate
The Bank has established valuation allowances for estimated losses on specific
loans and real estate ("specific reserves") and for the inherent risk in the
loan and real estate portfolios which has yet to be specifically identified
("general valuation allowances" or "GVA"). The internal asset review department
reviews the quality and recoverability of the Bank's assets on a quarterly
basis, in order to establish adequate specific reserves and general valuation
allowances. The Bank utilizes the delinquency migration and the classification
methods in determining the adequacy of its GVA. The delinquency migration
method attempts to capture the potential future losses as of a particular date
associated with a given portfolio of loans, based on the Bank's own historical
migration experience over a given period of time. Under the classification
method, a reserve factor is applied to each aggregate classification level by
asset collateral type in an effort to estimate the loss content in the
portfolio. The Bank calculates a range of loss by applying both methodologies
and then applies judgment and knowledge of particular credits, economic trends,
industry experience and other relevant factors to estimate the GVA amount.
Additions to the allowances, in the form of provisions, are reflected in
current operations. Charge-offs to the allowances are made when the loss is
determined to be significant and permanent.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization are computed principally on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements
are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the useful lives of
the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Intangible Assets
In 1993, the Bank reassessed the valuation of its intangible assets which
resulted in a writedown of $14.0 million. See Note 7 for further information.
Until 1993, the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired
(goodwill) in connection with the acquisition of Mariners Savings and Loan in
1978, was included in intangible assets in the statements of financial
condition and was being amortized to operations over forty years.
The cost of core deposits purchased from various financial institutions is
amortized over the average life of the deposits acquired, generally, five to
ten years.
F-10
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES--(CONTINUED)
Income Taxes
The Bank and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return and
a combined California franchise tax return with its parent company.
Beginning in 1991, income taxes have been determined pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes."
Prior to 1991, income taxes were determined pursuant to SFAS No. 96. The impact
of adopting SFAS No. 109 was not material in relation to SFAS No. 96.
Financial Instruments
In the normal course of business, the Bank enters into off-balance sheet
instruments to enhance yields and to alter its exposure to interest rate risk.
These financial instruments include interest rate swaps and swap option
agreements and puts and calls. The differences to be paid or received on swaps
that are used to match balance sheet items are included in interest expense as
payments are made or received. The swap options are held as trading positions
during the option period and are carried at market value and gains and losses
are reflected in operations. The puts and calls are held as trading positions
and are carried at market value.
SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," requires
disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or
not recognized in the statement of financial condition, for which it is
practicable to estimate that value. Financial instruments are defined as cash,
evidence of an ownership in an entity, or a contract that conveys or imposes on
an entity the contractual right or obligation to either receive or deliver cash
or another financial instrument.
Much of the information used to determine fair value is highly subjective. When
applicable, readily available market information has been utilized. However,
for a significant portion of the Bank's financial instruments, active markets
do not exist. Therefore, considerable judgment was required in estimating fair
value for certain items. The subjective factors include, among other things,
the estimated timing and amount of cash flows, risk characteristics, credit
quality and interest rates, all of which are subject to change. Since the fair
value is estimated as of December 31, 1993, the amounts that will actually be
realized or paid at settlement or maturity of the instruments could be
significantly different. SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments
and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly,
the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying
value of the Bank.
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating fair value
disclosures for financial instruments which are contained in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements that describe each financial instrument.
Cash and cash equivalents: The book value amounts reported in the statement of
financial condition for cash and cash equivalents approximate the fair value of
such assets, because of the short maturity of such investments.
Investment securities and mortgage-backed securities: Estimated fair values for
investment and mortgage-backed securities are based on quoted market prices,
where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair
values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.
Loans: The estimated fair values of real estate loans held for sale are based
on quoted market prices. The estimated fair values of loans receivable held for
investment are based on quoted market prices, when available, or an option
adjusted cash flow valuation ("OACFV"). The OACFV includes forward interest
rate simulations and the credit quality of performing and nonperforming loans.
Such valuations may not be indicative of the value derived upon a sale of all
or part of the portfolio. The book value of accrued interest approximates its
fair value.
Investment in FHLB stock: The book value reported in the statement of financial
condition for the investment in FHLB stock approximates fair value as the stock
may be sold back to the Federal Home Loan Bank at face value to the extent that
it exceeds the amount of FHLB stock which Fidelity is required to hold.
Deposits: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money
market deposits is the amount payable on demand. The fair value of fixed rate
certificates of deposits is estimated by using an OACFV analysis.
F-11
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES--(CONTINUED)
Borrowings (including FHLB Advances, other borrowings, and subordinated notes):
The estimated fair value is based on an OACFV model.
Off-balance sheet instruments: The estimated fair value for the Bank's off-
balance sheet instruments are based on quoted market prices, when available, or
an OACFV analysis.
NOTE 2--CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Federal funds sold are included in cash and cash equivalents. The Bank had
$20.0 million and $60.0 million of federal funds sold at March 31, 1994 and
December 31, 1993, respectively and no outstanding federal funds sold at
December 31, 1992.
Investment securities held for trading
Investment securities held for trading consisted of U.S. Treasury securities
purchased and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term.
There were no investment securities held for trading activities during the
quarters ended March 31, 1994 and 1993 and the Bank had no outstanding
investment securities held for trading at quarter-end March 31, 1994 or 1993.
For the three months ended March 31, 1994, there were no securities transferred
from the available for sale category to the trading category or from the held
to maturity category to the available for sale category, with the result that
no related gains or losses were recorded in earnings.
At December 31, 1993, the Bank had no outstanding investment securities held
for trading. However, proceeds from sales of investment securities held for
trading during 1993 were $248.3 million. Gross gains of $332,000 and gross
losses of $345,000 were realized from those sales and are reported in the
statement of operations as a component of gains/losses on sales of investment
securities.
There were no investment securities held for trading activities during 1992 and
1991 and the Bank had no outstanding investment securities held for trading at
year-end 1993 or 1992.
Investment securities available for sale
The following table summarizes the investment securities available for sale at
March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED AGGREGATE
COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Treasury and agency
issues $92,499(1) $2 $(1,907) $90,594
Other investments 5,007 -- -- 5,007
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$97,506 $2 $(1,907) $95,601
========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted average yield 4.64%
=========
</TABLE>
(1) Net of market value reduction of $0.8 million and valuation allowance of
$5.8 million, which were recorded previous to the adoption of SFAS No. 115.
The following table summarizes the investment securities available for sale at
December 31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------
UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
BOOK VALUE GAINS LOSSES VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Treasury and agency is-
sues $87,385 $256 $(3) $87,638
Other investments 4,874 -- -- 4,874
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$92,259 $256 $(3) $92,512
========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted average yield 4.65%
=========
</TABLE>
F-12
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 2--CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENT SECURITIES--(CONTINUED)
Other investments represent U.S. Treasury securities, carried at the lower of
cost or market value, which have been pledged and placed in trust to provide a
credit enhancement to a FNMA securitization of loans in September 1992 of
$114.3 million.
Fidelity had no outstanding investment securities available for sale at
December 31, 1992 or 1991.
During the quarter ended March 31, 1994, the Bank did not sell any U.S.
Treasury or agency securities. However, the Bank had gross gains of $0.3
million realized from hedging activities and trading futures and options for
the quarter ended March 31, 1994.
During the year ended December 31, 1993, the Bank had gross gains of $110,000
and gross losses of $7,000 on the sale of investment securities available for
sale. The Bank also recorded a loss of $2.1 million at December 31, 1993 to
adjust the book value of investment securities available for sale to the lower
of cost or market. During the years ended December 31, 1992 and 1991, the Bank
had no gross gains or losses on the sale of investment securities available for
sale.
The following table shows the investment securities available for sale at
December 31, 1993 by maturity:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------
BOOK
(Dollars in VALUE MARKET VALUE
thousands) ------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
YEAR OF MATURITY:
1994 $ 1,301 $ 1,301
1995 through 1998 90,686 90,939
1999 through 2003 272 272
------- -------
$92,259 $92,512
======= =======
</TABLE>
Investment securities held to maturity
There were no investment securities held to maturity activities in the first
quarter of 1994 and the Bank had no outstanding investment securities held to
maturity at March 31, 1994.
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity during 1993, 1992 and 1991
were $26.9 million, $0 and $1.5 million, respectively. The following gross
gains and gross losses were realized from those sales and are reported in the
statements of operations for the indicated periods, as a component of
gains/losses on sales of investment securities, net:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------
GROSS
SALES GAINS (LOSSES)
(Dollars in thousands) ------- ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1993 $26,908 $1,946 $ --
1992 -- -- --
1991 1,547 1 --
</TABLE>
During 1993, the Bank changed its investment strategy and as a result, moved
its entire portfolio of investment securities from the investment portfolio to
the available for sale portfolio. The Bank had no outstanding investment
securities held to maturity at December 31, 1993.
The following table summarizes the investment securities held to maturity at
December 31, 1992:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------
BOOK UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
VALUE GAINS LOSSES VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Treasury and agency is-
sues $24,950 $1,908 $ -- $26,858
Commercial paper 29,986 14 -- 30,000
Other investments 12,401 -- (218) 12,183
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$67,337 $1,922 $(218) $69,041
========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted average yield 5.77%
=========
</TABLE>
F-13
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 2--CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENT SECURITIES--(CONTINUED)
Other investments represent U.S. Treasury securities which have been pledged
and placed in trust to provide a credit enhancement to a FNMA securitization of
loans in September 1992 of $114.3 million.
At March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993 and 1992, the Bank had accrued interest
receivable of $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively, on
investment securities available for sale and held to maturity, which is
included in interest receivable in the accompanying statements of financial
condition.
NOTE 3--MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
Mortgage-backed securities held for trading
The Bank had no outstanding mortgage-backed securities held for trading at
March 31, 1994. In the first quarter of 1994, no mortgage-backed securities
held for trading were sold, purchased or transferred from the trading category
to the available for sale category, with the result that no related gains or
losses were recorded.
The Bank had no outstanding mortgage-backed securities held for trading at
December 31, 1993 and 1992. Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities
held for trading during 1993 totaled $51.3 million. Gross gains of $54,000 were
realized from those sales and are reported in the statement of operations as a
component of gains/losses on sales of mortgage-backed securities, net. There
were no comparable activities for mortgage-backed securities held for trading
during 1992 and 1991.
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
Summarized below are mortgage-backed securities available for sale at March 31,
1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED AGGREGATE
COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FHLMC Participation Certifi-
cates ("PCs") $ 3,927 $ -- $(34) $ 3,893
FNMA PCs 4,447 -- (34) 4,413
Private Participation Cer-
tificates 36,604 141 -- 36,745
CMO Bonds 3,270 -- (23) 3,247
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$48,248 $141 $(91) $48,298
========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted average yield 5.31%
=========
</TABLE>
During the first quarter of 1994, the Bank realized $0.6 million of gross gains
and $0.9 million of gross losses from sales of mortgage-backed securities
available for sale of $94.2 million.
Summarized below are mortgage-backed securities available for sale at December
31, 1993:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------
BOOK UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
VALUE GAINS LOSSES VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FHLMC PCs $34,184 $3 $(217) $33,970
FNMA PCs 14,853 -- (33) 14,820
Private Participation Cer-
tificates 38,223 454 -- 38,677
CMO Bonds 3,848 -- (17) 3,831
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$91,108 $457 $(267) $91,298
========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted average yield 5.33%
=========
</TABLE>
The Bank had no outstanding mortgage-backed securities available for sale at
December 31, 1992.
During the year ended December 31, 1993, the Bank had gross gains of $4.9
million and gross losses of $5.1 million on the sale of mortgage-backed
securities available for sale compared to no gross gains or losses for the
years ended December 31, 1992 and 1991.
F-14
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 3--MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES--(CONTINUED)
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
The Bank had no outstanding mortgage-backed securities held to maturity at
March 31, 1994. In the first quarter of 1994, no mortgage-backed securities
held to maturity were sold, purchased or transferred from the held to maturity
category to the available for sale category, with the result that no related
gains or losses were recorded.
During 1993, the Bank changed its investment strategy and as a result, moved
its entire portfolio of mortgage-backed securities from the held to maturity
portfolio to the available for sale portfolio. The Bank had no outstanding
mortgage-backed securities held to maturity at December 31, 1993.
During the year ended December 31, 1993, the Bank had gross gains of $1.5
million and gross losses of $1,000 on the sale of mortgage-backed securities
held to maturity compared to no gross gains or losses for the year ended
December 31, 1992 and gross gains of $9.3 million and gross losses of $0.3
million for the year ended December 31, 1991.
Summarized below are mortgage-backed securities held to maturity at December
31, 1992:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------
BOOK UNREALIZED UNREALIZED MARKET
VALUE GAINS LOSSES VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) --------- ---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FHLMC PCs $102,476 $ 410 $(1,397) $101,489
GNMA PCs 14,466 889 -- 15,355
FNMA PCs 113,442 275 -- 113,717
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$230,384 $1,574 $(1,397) $230,561
========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted average yield 6.36%
=========
</TABLE>
At March 31, 1994 and December 31, 1993 and 1992, the Bank had accrued interest
receivable on mortgage-backed securities available for sale and held to
maturity of $0.2 million, $0.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively, which is
included in interest receivable in the accompanying statements of financial
condition.
NOTE 4--LOANS RECEIVABLE AND LOANS HELD FOR SALE
Total loans include loans receivable and loans held for sale and are summarized
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REAL ESTATE LOANS:
Single family $ 693,774 $ 792,054 $ 857,631
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 439,388 505,219 526,826
5 to 36 units 1,793,249 1,795,374 1,880,589
37 units and over 414,450 406,330 444,576
Commercial and industrial 300,583 295,761 343,270
Land 3,532 3,736 5,353
---------- ---------- ----------
Total real estate loans 3,644,976 3,798,474 4,058,245
Other 7,900 8,758 8,038
---------- ---------- ----------
3,652,876 3,807,232 4,066,283
---------- ---------- ----------
LESS:
Undisbursed loan funds 240 -- 301
Unearned discounts 204 210 104
Deferred loan fees 10,423 11,139 11,152
Market valuation allowance 1,050 -- --
Allowance for estimated losses 91,368 83,832 64,277
---------- ---------- ----------
103,285 95,181 75,834
---------- ---------- ----------
$3,549,591 $3,712,051 $3,990,449
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
F-15
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4--LOANS RECEIVABLE AND LOANS HELD FOR SALE--(CONTINUED)
Included above are $53.4 million, $56.3 million and $63.3 million of amounts
drawn under home equity lines of credit at March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993
and 1992, respectively. The remaining, unused balance of approved home equity
credit lines was $50.0 million, $52.1 million and $66.2 million at the
respective dates.
Also included above are loans held for sale, consisting of the following at the
dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
RESIDENTIAL LOANS:
Single family $126,765 $239,371 $25,043
Multifamily 2 to 4 units 63,323 128,317 1,439
--------- --------- ---------
Total loans held for sale $190,088 $367,688 $26,482
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
Fidelity's portfolio of mortgage loans serviced for others amounted to $1.1
billion, $888.4 million and $982.7 million at March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993
and 1992, respectively.
Fidelity's loan portfolio includes multifamily, commercial and industrial loans
of $2.9 billion which depend on operating income to provide debt service
coverage. Therefore, these loans generally have a greater risk of default than
single family residential loans and, accordingly, earn a higher rate of
interest to compensate in part for the risk. Approximately 99% of these loans
are secured by property within the state of California. The continued weakening
in the California real estate market does not make the market compare as
favorably to other sections of the country as it has in the past.
The Bank has modified a number of its loans. In some cases, the modifications
have taken the form of "early recasts" in which the amortizing payments are
revised (or recalculated) earlier than scheduled to reflect current lower
interest rates. In other cases, the Bank has agreed to accept interest only
payments for a limited time at current interest rates. In still other cases,
the Bank has modified loans at terms that are less favorable to the Bank than
the current market. These loans have interest rates that may be less than
current market rates or may contain other concessions. Due to the fact that
these modifications resulted from formal requests from borrowers claiming
economic distress due to increased risk of borrower inability to perform
according to contractual terms, these modified loans have been categorized by
the Bank as TDRs. At March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993 and 1992, outstanding
TDRs totaled $33.8 million, $28.7 million and $87.3 million, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 1993, interest income of $8.3 million was
recorded on TDRs, $0.1 million less than which would have been recorded had the
loans performed according to their original terms. During 1992, $10.0 million
of interest income was recorded on TDRs, $0.3 million less than would have been
recorded had the loans performed according to their original terms. During
1991, $0.7 million of interest income was recorded on a TDR the same as would
have been recorded if the loan was performing.
It is the Bank's policy to reserve all earned but unpaid interest on loans over
90 days contractually delinquent and other loans the Bank believes exhibit
materially deficient characteristics. The total of these loans was $139.4
million, $93.5 million, $112.0 million, and $69.0 million at March 31, 1994,
December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. The reduction in income related
to these loans upon which interest was not paid was $3.2 million, $8.7 million,
$13.6 million, and $7.6 million for the corresponding periods.
The estimated fair value of loans receivable (not including loans held for
sale) was $3.4 billion at December 31, 1993 and $3.9 billion at December 31,
1992, which includes $93.5 million and $97.2 million of nonperforming loans,
respectively (see Note 1 discussion of SFAS No. 107). At December 31, 1993,
loans held for sale consisted of $321 million of adjustable rate loans and $47
million of fixed rate loans on 1 to 4 unit properties. The estimated fair value
of loans held for sale was $368.8 million at December 31, 1993 and $26.7
million at December 31, 1992 (see Note 1 discussion of SFAS No. 107).
F-16
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 5--OWNED REAL ESTATE
Owned real estate consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate acquired for investment
or development $ 11,770 $ 11,161 $ 12,091
Real estate acquired through
foreclosure 147,352 131,799 90,290
In-substance foreclosed real estate -- 28,362 47,324
Allowance for estimated losses (20,465) (17,715) (16,450)
--------- --------- ---------
$138,657 $153,607 $133,255
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The following summarizes the results of real estate operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991
(Dollars in thousands) -------------- -------------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income (loss) from:
Real estate acquired for
investment or
development $ 628 $ (158) $ 110 $ (841) $ (934)
Real estate acquired
through foreclosure (2,685) (3,160) (18,753) (3,600) (1,126)
Provision for estimated
losses (4,300) (1,000) (30,200) (17,820) (7,537)
------------- ------------- --------- --------- ---------
$(6,357) $(4,318) $(48,843) $(22,261) $(9,597)
============= ============= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTE 6--ALLOWANCE FOR ESTIMATED LOAN AND REAL ESTATE LOSSES
The following summarizes the activity in Fidelity's allowance for estimated
loan and real estate losses:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------
OWNED
REAL
LOANS ESTATE TOTAL
(Dollars in thousands) --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1991 $ 16,552 $ -- $ 16,552
Provision for losses 49,843 7,537 57,380
Charge-offs (17,005) (7,537) (24,542)
Recoveries 2,984 -- 2,984
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1991 52,374 -- 52,374
Provision for losses 51,180 17,820 69,000
Transfer of general valuation allow-
ance (12,400) 12,400 --
Charge-offs (27,350) (13,826) (41,176)
Recoveries 473 56 529
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1992 64,277 16,450 80,727
Provision for losses 65,100 30,200 95,300
Charge-offs (50,504) (28,940) (79,444)
Recoveries 4,959 5 4,964
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1993 83,832 17,715 101,547
Provision for Losses 15,600 4,300 19,900
Charge-offs (9,781) (1,550) (11,331)
Recoveries 1,717 -- 1,717
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at March 31, 1994 $ 91,368 $ 20,465 $111,833
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
F-17
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 6--ALLOWANCE FOR ESTIMATED LOAN AND REAL ESTATE LOSSES--(CONTINUED)
While certain segments of the Southern California economy have begun to show
signs of improvements, the overall economy has remained lethargic and continues
to trail other regions in the country. This continuing weakness has adversely
affected the credit risk profile and performance of the Company's loan
portfolio which is concentrated in loans secured by multifamily residential
properties located in Southern California. In addition, the Northridge
earthquake of January 17, 1994 and its attendant aftershocks have adversely
impacted hundreds of the Bank's borrowers which resulted in increased requests
for assistance involving payment deferral and/or cash advances. The Bank raised
its general valuation allowance by $5.1 million during the first quarter of
1994 to $85.1 million from $80.0 million at December 31, 1993, primarily to
cover for potential losses associated with the earthquake. Total allowances
(general valuation allowance ("GVA") and specific valuation allowances) totaled
$111.8 million at March 31, 1994, an increase of $10.3 million from the year-
end level of $101.5 million.
The following schedule presents loans for which the Bank has established
allowance for credit losses (specific valuation allowances) to recognize
impairment in connection with SFAS No. 114 as of March 31, 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------
% OF
ALLOWANCE ALLOWANCE
LOAN FOR CREDIT TO LOAN
AMOUNT LOSSES AMOUNT
(Dollars in thousands) --------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Property type:
Single family $ 2,547 $ 241 9.46%
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units 1,051 203 19.31%
5 to 19 units 13,618 4,405 32.35%
20 to 36 units 14,222 3,744 26.33%
37 units and over 18,540 4,944 26.67%
--------- ---------
Total multifamily 47,431 13,296 28.03%
--------- ---------
Commercial and industrial 4,051 1,282 31.65%
--------- ---------
$54,029 $14,819 27.43%
========= =========
</TABLE>
The Bank's percentage of nonperforming assets to total assets has increased to
6.46% at March 31, 1994 from 5.37% at December 31, 1993, 4.99% at December 31,
1992 and 2.43% at December 31, 1991.
NOTE 7--INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In 1993, Fidelity reassessed the valuation of its intangible assets. Based upon
the results of a branch profitability analysis and an analysis of the
recoverability of its core deposit intangible assets, Fidelity wrote down the
carrying value of its core deposit intangible assets in an amount of $5.2
million (which writedown is included in interest expense). The net unamortized
balance of core deposit intangibles was $2.1 million at December 31, 1993, and
is being amortized over the remaining average life of the deposits acquired,
generally, one to three years.
In addition, an analysis was performed of the recoverability of the goodwill
related to the acquisition of Mariners Savings and Loan ("Mariners") in 1978.
This analysis indicated that the expected future net earnings from the branches
or assets acquired did not support the carrying value of the goodwill. As a
result, Fidelity wrote down the remaining $8.8 million balance of goodwill
related to the Mariners acquisition (which writedown is included in operating
expense).
F-18
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 7--INTANGIBLE ASSETS--(CONTINUED)
The amortization and writedown of core deposit intangibles, resulting from
purchases of deposits, and goodwill acquired in the acquisitions of other
financial institutions for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1993, are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------
1993 1992 1991
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Amortization of core deposit intangibles $ 4,020 $4,199 $4,296
Writedown of core deposit intangibles 5,192 -- --
Amortization of goodwill 470 596 840
Writedown of goodwill 8,776 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Net decrease in income before income
taxes $18,458 $4,795 $5,136
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTE 8--DEPOSITS
Deposits consist of the following at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
TYPE OF ACCOUNT, WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTER-
EST RATE:
Passbook, 2.00% at March 31, 1994, De-
cember 31, 1993 and 2.50% at December
31, 1992 $ 90,287 $ 82,168 $ 74,738
Checking and money market checking,
0.93% at
March 31, 1994, 0.96% at December 31,
1993 and 1.48% at December 31, 1992 396,799 366,968 338,496
Money market passbook, 2.38% at March
31, 1994, 2.37%
at December 31, 1993 and 2.79% at De-
cember 31, 1992 270,786 280,495 429,708
---------- ---------- ----------
757,872 729,631 842,942
---------- ---------- ----------
CERTIFICATES WITH RATES OF:
Under 3.00% 603,038 418,326 290,785
3.01-4.00% 1,023,965 1,326,449 1,126,970
4.01-5.00% 341,699 395,129 375,034
5.01-6.00% 88,027 137,710 236,627
6.01-7.00% 225,213 225,035 381,334
7.01-8.00% 89,791 90,280 147,037
Over 8.00% 41,701 46,104 58,919
---------- ---------- ----------
2,413,434 2,639,033 2,616,706
---------- ---------- ----------
$3,171,306 $3,368,664 $3,459,648
========== ========== ==========
Weighted average interest rate 3.44% 3.59% 4.00%
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
F-19
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 8--DEPOSITS--(CONTINUED)
The following table presents the percentage of each type of account to total
deposits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
--------- ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
TYPE OF ACCOUNT:
Passbook 2.9% 2.4% 2.2%
Checking and money market checking 12.5% 10.9% 9.8%
Money market passbook 8.5% 8.4% 12.4%
------ ------ ------
23.9% 21.7% 24.4%
------ ------ ------
CERTIFICATES WITH RATES OF:
Under 3.00% 19.0% 12.4% 8.4%
3.01-4.00% 32.3% 39.4% 32.6%
4.01-5.00% 10.8% 11.7% 10.8%
5.01-6.00% 2.8% 4.1% 6.8%
6.01-7.00% 7.1% 6.7% 11.0%
7.01-8.00 2.8% 2.7% 4.3%
Over 8.00% 1.3% 1.3% 1.7%
------ ------ ------
76.1% 78.3% 75.6%
------ ------ ------
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Fidelity had noninterest-bearing checking accounts of $66.1 million, $52.9
million and $31.6 million at March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993 and 1992,
respectively.
At December 31, 1993, certificate accounts were scheduled to mature as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------
(Dollars in AMOUNT
thousands) ----------
<S> <C>
YEAR OF MATURITY:
1994 $2,097,475
1995 220,791
1996 91,610
1997 203,317
1998 25,488
After 1999 352
----------
$2,639,033
==========
</TABLE>
At March 31, 1994 and December 31, 1993, loans totaling $102.0 million and
$98.3 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for $5.1 million and
$5.9 million, respectively, of public funds on deposit with the Bank and
potential future deposits.
Certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more accounted for $508 million and
represented 16% of all deposits at March 31, 1994, $593 million or 18% of all
deposits at December 31, 1993, $550 million or 16% of all deposits at December
31, 1992 and $629 million or 16% of all deposits at December 31, 1991.
F-20
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 8--DEPOSITS--(CONTINUED)
The Bank also utilizes brokered deposits as a short-term means of funding.
These deposits are obtained or placed by or through a deposit broker and are
subject to certain regulatory limitations. The following table summarizes the
Bank's outstanding balance of brokered deposits at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------
PERCENT OF
(Dollars in AMOUNT TOTAL DEPOSITS
thousands) ------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
March 31, 1994 $38,258 1.21%
December 31, 1993 $92,196 2.74%
December 31, 1992 $12,850 0.37%
</TABLE>
The carrying amounts and the estimated fair values of deposits consisted of the
following at December 31, 1993 (see Note 1 discussion of SFAS No. 107):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1992
BOOK VALUE FAIR VALUE BOOK VALUE FAIR VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Passbook, checking and money
market accounts $ 729,631 $ 729,600 $ 842,942 $ 842,900
Certificates of deposit 2,639,033 2,684,100 2,616,706 2,656,200
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total deposits $3,368,664 $3,413,700 $3,459,648 $3,499,100
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
SFAS No. 107 defines the fair value of demand deposits as the stated amount of
passbook, checking and certain money market accounts. Although SFAS No. 107
specifically prohibits including a deposit-based intangible element as part of
the fair value disclosure for deposit liabilities, it does allow supplemental
disclosure, which is unaudited. The core deposit intangible is the excess of
the fair value of demand deposits over recorded amounts and represents the
benefit of retaining these deposits for an expected period of time. Fair value
is based on a discounted cash flow analysis using the Bank's alternative
funding costs for similar maturities and assumed retention rates for each type
of deposit. The core deposit intangible is estimated to be $63.0 million at
December 31, 1993 and $45.5 million at December 31, 1992, and is not included
in the above fair values or recorded as an asset in the statement of financial
condition.
NOTE 9--FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
FHLB Advances are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) --------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at period end $342,700 $326,400 $ 581,400
Average amount outstanding during the
period $345,780 $394,591 $ 393,344
Maximum amount outstanding at any month
end....................................... $371,400 $496,400 $ 581,400
Weighted average interest rate during the
period.................................... 3.83% 4.33% 5.27%
Weighted average interest rate at period
end....................................... 4.46% 4.52% 4.25%
Secured by:
FHLB Stock................................. $ 52,427 $ 51,951 $ 50,559
Loans receivable (1)....................... 622,360 900,776 1,661,950
-------- -------- ----------
$674,787 $952,727 $1,712,509
======== ======== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) Includes pledged loans available for use under the letter of credit
securing commercial paper (available unused balance was $146 million at
March 31, 1994 and $96 million at December 31, 1993). See Note 10.
F-21
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 9--FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES--(CONTINUED)
The maturities and weighted average interest rates on FHLB Advances are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
MARCH 31, 1994 1993 1992
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
AMOUNT INTEREST RATE AMOUNT INTEREST RATE AMOUNT INTEREST RATE
(Dollars in thousands) --------- ------------- --------- ------------- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
YEAR OF MATURITY:
1993 $ -- --% $ -- --% $325,000 3.64%
1994 20,000 4.45% 3,700 3.32% 3,700 4.10%
1996 60,000 4.88% 60,000 4.88% -- --
1997 232,700 3.92% 232,700 4.02% 232,700 4.73%
1998 10,000 6.30% 10,000 6.30% -- --
2000 20,000 8.61% 20,000 8.61% 20,000 8.61%
---------- --------- ---------
$342,700 4.46% $326,400 4.52% $581,400 4.25%
========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
The estimated fair value of FHLB Advances at December 31, 1993 was $328 million
(see Note 1 discussion of SFAS No. 107).
NOTE 10--OTHER BORROWINGS AND SUBORDINATED NOTES
Other borrowings consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------
YEAR OF MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
MATURITY 1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS:
8 7/8% Mortgage-backed medium
term notes ("1993 MTNs") 1993 $ -- $ -- $100,000
9 3/4% Commercial mortgage-
backed bonds ("CMBBs") 1993 -- -- 62,000
Commercial Paper 1993 -- -- 65,000
Commercial Paper 1994 254,000 304,000 --
Securities sold under agree-
ment to repurchase 1994 -- 3,830 --
--------- --------- ---------
254,000 307,830 227,000
--------- --------- ---------
LONG-TERM BORROWINGS:
8 1/2% Mortgage-backed medium
term notes ("1997 MTNs") 1997 100,000 100,000 100,000
--------- --------- ---------
$354,000 $407,830 $327,000
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
F-22
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 10--OTHER BORROWINGS AND SUBORDINATED NOTES--(CONTINUED)
The mortgage-backed bonds and notes are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
--------- -------- --------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
MORTGAGE-BACKED MEDIUM TERM NOTES:
1993 MTNs, matured May 15, 1993:
Balance at period-end -- -- $100,000
Interest rate at period-end -- -- 8.88%
1997 MTNs, due April 15, 1997:
Balance at period-end $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Interest rate at period-end 8.50% 8.50% 8.50%
1993 and 1997 MTNs are secured by:
Joint pool of mortgage loans and mortgage-
backed securities -- -- $414,573
Joint pool of mortgage loans and U.S. Trea-
sury notes $217,336 $255,720 --
CMBBS, MATURED SEPTEMBER 15, 1993:
Balance at period-end -- -- $ 62,000
Secured by mortgage loans and U.S. Treasury
Notes -- -- $208,923
Interest rate at period-end -- -- 9.32%
</TABLE>
Borrowings other than the mortgage-backed bonds and notes are summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) --------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
COMMERCIAL PAPER:
Balance at period-end $254,000 $304,000 $ 65,000
Average amount outstanding during the period $316,710 $274,620 $ 21,165
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end $329,000 $342,090 $ 94,400
Weighted average interest rate during the
period 3.35% 3.44% 4.05%
Weighted average interest rate at period-end 3.47% 3.38% 3.57%
Secured by Letter of Credit from FHLB $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENT TO
REPURCHASE:
Balance at period period-end -- $ 3,830 --
Average amount outstanding during the period $ 9,620 $138,701 $ 19,542
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end $ 3,830 $289,885 $111,633
Weighted average interest rate during the
period 3.29 3.23% 3.32%
Weighted average interest rate at period-end -- 3.40% --
Secured by mortgage-backed securities, at
cost -- $ 4,000 --
OTHER BORROWINGS:
Balance at period-end -- -- --
Average amount outstanding during the period -- -- $ 1,085
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end -- -- $ 3,193
Weighted average interest rate during the
period -- -- 9.54%
Weighted average interest rate at period-end -- -- --
</TABLE>
F-23
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 10--OTHER BORROWINGS AND SUBORDINATED NOTES--(CONTINUED)
The Bank has entered into a Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of May 15,
1990 (the "Subordinated Loan Agreement") pursuant to which $60 million in
11.68% subordinated notes (the "Subordinated Notes") are outstanding, which
Subordinated Notes are guaranteed by Citadel. The Subordinated Notes were
approved by the OTS as additional regulatory capital. The Subordinated Loan
Agreement, among other covenants, contains a provision requiring Fidelity to
maintain a consolidated tangible net worth at least equal to the greater of (a)
$170 million plus 50% of consolidated net earnings since January 1, 1990, or(b)
3.25% of consolidated assets. Fidelity's consolidated tangible net worth at
March 31, 1994 was $165.1 million.
Management's interpretation of the foregoing clause indicates that the Bank's
consolidated tangible net worth is above the net worth requirement, assuming
the formula in clause (a) permits a reduction of the $170 million test if a
consolidated net loss has been sustained since January 1, 1990. Under this
interpretation, the amount of consolidated tangible net worth necessary to meet
the requirement of clause (a) would be $146.8 million at March 31, 1994 and
would be further reduced by 50% of all losses during the remainder of 1994. The
amount of consolidated tangible net worth necessary to meet the requirement of
clause (b) was $133.7 million. Management's projections for the balance of 1994
indicate that the Bank's consolidated tangible net worth will remain above the
net worth requirement (assuming it is interpreted as described above) only if
the Restructuring and Recapitalization (see Note 14) is accomplished or other
capital raising efforts are successful.
The holders of the Subordinated Notes could take the position that the amount
under clause (a) may not be reduced by losses to less than $170 million. Under
that position, Fidelity would be in violation of the covenant as of March 31,
1994. Management believes that such position is not correct; however, there can
be no assurance that such position would not prevail if the issue were ever
tested in court. If the above covenant were violated, the holders of 66 2/3% in
aggregate principal amount of the Subordinated Notes would be entitled to
declare the entire amount of the Subordinated Notes immediately due and
payable. However, if such acceleration would result in the Bank's failure to
meet applicable regulatory capital requirements, the holders would be
prohibited from accelerating the Subordinated Notes without the prior approval
of the OTS. If the Bank failed to make such accelerated payment, Citadel would
be required to make such payment under its guarantee of the Subordinated Notes.
Management anticipates that Citadel's funds would be insufficient to make such
payment, unless additional funds were raised.
Any violation of the tangible net worth covenant or the occurrence of any other
event of default under the Subordinated Loan Agreement would also result in a
cross default under Fidelity's debt agreements with the FHLB (whether or not
the Subordinated Notes are accelerated) and entitle the FHLB to declare all
amounts outstanding to become immediately due and payable. Also, the FHLB may
elect not to make further Advances to the Bank and may prevent the Bank from
issuing further commercial paper under its existing facility.
The holders of the Subordinated Notes have power of approval over certain
matters, including certain asset sales, and may require a repurchase of the
Subordinated Notes upon a "Significant Event". The Restructuring and
Recapitalization as currently contemplated may constitute a "Significant Event"
depending upon the structuring of the proposed additional equity investment in
the Bank. If the Restructuring and Recapitalization triggers the Significant
Event repurchase requirement, Citadel could be required to pay the principal
balance of the Subordinated Notes of $60 million plus accrued interest and a
premium of approximately $9.9 million (calculated as of March 31, 1994).
Citadel is in discussions with the holders of the Subordinated Notes regarding
a possible repurchase of the Subordinated Notes at a purchase price equal to
the unpaid principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
Any such repurchase would be contingent upon consummation of the
Restructuring and Recapitalization and would require OTS approval. No assurance
can be given that such discussions will be successful or that the Restructuring
and Recapitalization can be consummated without the consent of the Subordinated
Note holders (see Note 17).
During 1992 and 1991, Citadel paid $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively,
in interest to Craig Corporation (an 8.9% stockholder of the Company and thus a
related party) on a $15 million borrowing from that entity. The loan was paid
off in June 1992.
F-24
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 10--OTHER BORROWINGS AND SUBORDINATED NOTES--(CONTINUED)
The weighted average interest rate on other borrowings and subordinated notes
was 5.88%, 5.54% and 8.39% at March 31, 1994, December 31, 1993 and December
31, 1992, respectively.
The carrying and estimated fair values of other borrowings and subordinated
notes consisted of the following (see Note 1 discussion of SFAS No. 107):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 1993 DECEMBER 31, 1992
BOOK VALUE FAIR VALUE BOOK VALUE FAIR VALUE
(Dollars in thousands) ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Commercial paper $304,000 $304,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000
CMBBs -- -- 62,000 64,600
1993 MTNs -- -- 100,000 103,600
1997 MTNs 100,000 110,600 100,000 109,500
Subordinated notes 60,000 60,300 60,000 57,100
Securities sold under agree-
ment to repurchase 3,830 3,800 -- --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$467,830 $478,700 $387,000 $399,800
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
NOTE 11--EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Postretirement Benefits
The Bank provides certain health and life insurance postretirement benefits for
all eligible retired employees. Eligibility for the plan is met when the
participant reaches age 55 and has 10 years of continuous service.
Effective January 1, 1993, the Bank adopted SFAS No. 106, "Employers'
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" for its unfunded
postretirement health care and life insurance program. This statement requires
the cost of postretirement benefits to be accrued during the service lives of
employees. The Bank's previous practice was to expense these costs on a cash
basis.
As of December 31, 1992, the Bank's accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation ("APBO") was approximately $3.1 million. Upon adoption of the
statement, the Bank could make the election to immediately recognize the
liability or to amortize the amount to expense over 20 years. The Bank has
elected to amortize this transition obligation over 20 years. Net periodic
postretirement benefit costs for 1993 included the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------
AMOUNT
(Dollars in thousands) ---------
<S> <C>
Service cost (benefits attributed to service during the peri-
od) $187.1
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation 250.2
Amortization of transition obligation 156.4
---------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $593.7
=========
</TABLE>
F-25
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED
NOTE 11--EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS--(CONTINUED)
The following table sets forth the postretirement benefit liability at December
31, 1993:
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------
AMOUNT
(Dollars in thousands) --------
<S> <C>
Retirees $1,616.7
Employees presently eligible to retire 1,115.9
Employees not yet eligible to retire 974.7
--------
Total APBO 3,707.3
Unrecognized transition obligation (2,971.2)
Unrecognized cumulative loss (237.4)
--------
Net postretirement benefit liability recognized in the
statement of financial condition $ 498.7
========
</TABLE>
The APBO as of December 31, 1993, was determined using a 7.25% weighted average
discount rate. The health care cost trend rates were assumed to be 9.5% at
December 31, 1993, gradually declining to 5.25% after ten years and remaining
at that level thereafter. The health care cost trend rate assumption has a
significant effect on the amount reported. For example, a 1% increase in the
health care trend rate in each year, would increase the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation by $0.6 million (or 17.2%) at December 31,
1993 and the net periodic cost by $0.1 million (or 14.6%) for the year.
Retirement Income Plan
The Bank has a retirement income plan covering substantially all employees. The
defined benefit plan provides for payment of retirement benefits commencing
normally at age 65 in a monthly annuity, however, the option of a single cash
payment is available. An employee becomes vested upon five years of service.
Benefits payable under the plan are generally determined on the basis of the
employee's length of service and average earnings. Annual contributions to the
plans are sufficient to satisfy legal funding requirements.
401(k) Plan
The Bank has a 401(k) defined contribution plan available to all employees who
have been with the Bank for one year and have reached the age of 21. Employees
may generally contribute up to 15% of their salary each year, and the Bank
matches 50% up to the first 6% contributed by the employee. Fidelity's
contributions were $.5 million, $.5 million and $.4 million in 1993, 1992 and
1991, respectively.
NOTE 12--INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense/benefit was comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------
THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991
(Dollars in thousands) --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CURRENT INCOME TAX EX-
PENSE (BENEFIT):
Federal $ 1,425 $ 743 $(50,229) $ 15,057 $ 23,157
State (34) 1 (1,090) 1,926 7,677
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
1,391 744 (51,319) 16,983 30,834
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
DEFERRED INCOME TAX EX-
PENSE (BENEFIT):
Federal (9,016) (519) 17,784 (14,937) (11,645)
State -- 46 (2,258) (4,213) (4,893)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(9,016) (473) 15,526 (19,150) (16,538)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
$(7,625) $ 271 $(35,793) $ (2,167) $ 14,296
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
F-26
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 12--INCOME TAXES--(CONTINUED)
Income taxes were comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
(Dollars in thousands) --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current income tax liability (re-
ceivable):
Federal $(41,521) $(42,926) $ 5,896
State 65 (1,752) (1,615)
--------- --------- ---------
(41,456) (44,678) 4,281
--------- --------- ---------
Deferred income tax liability (as-
set):
Federal 5,124 14,789 (2,995)
State (10,944) (8,303) 2,258
Valuation Allowance--State 10,944 8,303 --
--------- --------- ---------
5,124 14,789 (737)
--------- --------- ---------
$(36,332) $(29,889) $ 3,544
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
The components of the net deferred tax liability/asset are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1994 1993 1992
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
FEDERAL:
Deferred tax liabilities:
Loan fees and interest $ 12,041 $ 12,995 $13,906
FHLB stock dividends 12,298 12,066 11,515
California franchise tax 3,607 2,755 --
Other 6,249 7,218 5,229
--------- --------- ---------
Gross deferred tax liabilities 34,195 35,034 30,650
Deferred tax assets:
California franchise tax -- -- 1,698
Bad debt and loan loss deduction 14,305 11,369 25,997
REO operating income 3,008 2,926 --
Deposit base intangibles 5,005 -- --
Other 6,753 5,950 5,950
--------- --------- ---------
Gross deferred tax assets 29,071 20,245 33,645
Valuation allowance -- -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Deferred tax assets net of allowance 29,071 20,245 33,645
--------- --------- ---------
Net deferred tax liability (asset) $ 5,124 $ 14,789 $(2,995)
========= ========= =========
STATE:
Deferred tax liabilities:
Loan fees and interest $ 3,936 $ 4,245 $ 4,502
FHLB stock dividends 4,021 3,942 3,728
Other 1,623 2,507 1,371
--------- --------- ---------
Gross deferred tax liabilities 9,580 10,694 9,601
Deferred tax assets:
Bad debt and loan loss deduction 15,633 16,187 5,391
Deposit base intangibles 1,176 -- --
Other 3,715 2,810 1,952
--------- --------- ---------
Gross deferred tax assets 20,524 18,997 7,343
Valuation allowance (10,944) (8,303) --
--------- --------- ---------
Deferred tax assets, net of allow-
ance 9,580 10,694 7,343
--------- --------- ---------
Net deferred tax liability (asset) $ -- $ -- $ 2,258
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
F-27
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED
NOTE 12--INCOME TAXES--(CONTINUED)
No valuation allowance under SFAS 109 was required for federal purposes.
Federal deferred tax assets would be fully realized as an offset against
reversing temporary differences which create net future tax liabilities, and/or
through loss carrybacks. Therefore, even if no future income was expected,
federal deferred tax assets would still be fully realized. However, a valuation
allowance under SFAS No. 109 was required for state purposes, as certain state
deferred tax assets would not be realized as an offset against reversing
temporary differences which create net future state tax liabilities.
In conjunction with the current year's implementation of SFAS 115, a related
deferred income tax benefit of $0.7 million was recorded to stockholder's
equity in the first quarter of 1994.
A reconciliation from the statutory income tax expense/benefit to the
consolidated effective income tax expense/benefit follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------
THREE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
MARCH 31,
1994 1993 1993 1992 1991
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Expected federal income
tax expense (benefit) $(7,622) $162 $(34,571) $ (639) $ 7,616
Increases (reductions)
in taxes resulting
from:
Franchise tax expense
(benefit), net of
federal income tax
and valuation allow-
ance (10) 70 (4,386) (142) 1,837
Limitation of the tax
benefit due to
annualization of
carryback 4,200 -- -- -- --
Bad debt and loan loss
deduction -- -- -- -- 3,300
Goodwill -- 31 3,108 124 124
Redetermination of tax (3,700) -- -- (1,180) 1,423
Other, net (493) 8 56 (330) (4)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income tax expense
(benefit) $(7,625) $271 $(35,793) $(2,167) $14,296
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
Fidelity's tax returns have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service
through December 31, 1987 and by the California Franchise Tax Board through
December 31, 1985. The tax returns filed for 1986 through 1991 are currently
under audit by the California Franchise Tax Board. The tax returns filed for
1988 and 1989 are currently in the appeals process with the Internal Revenue
Service. In addition, the Internal Revenue Service is currently auditing the
tax returns filed for 1990 and 1991. Although Fidelity's management believes
its federal income tax returns properly reflect Fidelity's tax liability, the
Internal Revenue Service might assess additional taxes related to, among other
things, certain disputed industry issues affecting the industry as a whole. If
additional taxes are assessed, Fidelity intends to utilize all statutorily
allowable remedies to achieve a favorable outcome for years under examination.
Savings institutions are allowed a bad debt deduction for federal income tax
purposes based on either 8% of taxable income or the savings institution's
actual loss experience. Fidelity's bad debt deductions for the years presented
were based on actual loss experience.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 109 (paragraphs 31 and 32) a deferred tax
liability has not been provided for tax bad debt and loan loss reserves which
arose in tax years prior to December 31, 1987. Fidelity had $52.5 million of
such reserves at March 31, 1994 for which $18.4 million of taxes have not been
provided. If these reserves are used for any purpose other than to absorb bad
debt losses, federal taxes would have to be provided at the then current income
tax rate. It is not contemplated that the accumulated reserves will be used in
a manner that will create such liabilities.
F-28
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 13--COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Bank and certain of its subsidiaries had a number of lawsuits and claims
pending at December 31, 1993. The Bank's management and its counsel believe
that none of the lawsuits or claims pending will have a materially adverse
impact on the financial statements of Fidelity. However, see Note 17 for
litigation arising subsequent to December 31, 1993.
Fidelity enters into agreements to extend credit to customers on an ongoing
basis. Such commitments to lend represent credit risks. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Most commitments are expected to be drawn upon, and therefore
the total commitment amounts generally represent future cash requirements. At
December 31, 1993, the Bank had commitments to fund loans of $37.9 million at
market interest rates on the dates such commitments are to be funded.
At December 31, 1993, the Bank was a party to interest rate swap agreements in
which the Bank receives a fixed interest rate of 4.84% and pays a floating
interest rate of 3.43% on a total notional principal amount of $250 million.
These agreements have remaining maturities of less than four years and an
estimated fair value gain of $2.0 million. (See Note 1 discussion of SFAS No.
107.)
As of December 31, 1993, the Bank was party to several interest rate swap
agreements with a total notional amount of$200 million. The agreements give the
right to the buyer to cancel the swap agreement at a specified future date. The
Bank receives a fixed interest rate and pays a floating interest rate tied to
LIBOR over the life of the agreement for the option and swap. At
December 31, 1993, the average fixed receive rate was 5.00% and the average pay
rate was 3.34%. The swap options are held as trading positions during the
option period and are carried at market value and gains and losses are recorded
in operations. The estimated fair value of these positions at December 31, 1993
was a loss of approximately $1.7 million. In January 1994, the options to
cancel were not exercised and the average fixed receive rate adjusted to 4.70%.
The swaps have remaining maturities of less than four years. All these
contracts were entered into during 1993.
As of December 31, 1993, the Bank had several open put and call positions for
mortgage loans expiring in January 1994. These positions were minor and no
losses were incurred.
As of December 31, 1993, the Bank had certain loans with a gross principal
balance of $127.3 million, of which $106.3 million had been sold in the form of
mortgage pass-through certificates, over various periods of time, to four
investor financial institutions leaving a balance of $21.0 million retained by
the Bank. These mortgage pass-through certificates provide a credit enhancement
to the investor financial institutions in the form of the Bank's subordination
of its retained percentage interest to that of the investor financial
institutions. In this regard, the aggregate of $106.3 million held by the
investor financial institutions are deemed Senior Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates and the $21.0 million held by the Bank are subordinated to the
Senior Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates in the event of borrower default.
Full recovery of the $21.0 million is subject to this contingent liability due
to its subordination. In 1993, the Bank repurchased one of the Senior Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates with a face value of $38.3 million, from one of the
investor institutions. It is included in the mortgage-backed securities held
for sale portfolio at December 31, 1993. The other Senior Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates totaling $68.0 million are owned by other investor institutions.
During 1992, the Bank effected the securitization by FNMA of $114.3 million of
multifamily mortgages wherein $114.3 million in whole loans were swapped for
Triple A rated mortgage-backed securities through FNMA's Alternative Credit
Enhancement Structure ("ACES") program. These mortgage-backed securities were
sold in December 1993 and the current outstanding balance as of December 31,
1993 of $102.0 million is serviced by the Bank.
As part of a credit enhancement to absorb losses relating to the ACES
transaction, the Bank has pledged and placed in a trust account, as of December
31, 1993, $13.3 million, comprised of (a) $2.7 million in cash and (b) $10.6
million in book value U.S. Treasury securities. The Bank shall absorb losses,
if any, which may be incurred on the securitized multifamily loans and FNMA is
responsible for losses, if any, in excess of the $13.3 million. The securities
have been included in other investments held for sale and in response to this
classification, an adjustment has been recorded for lower of cost or market in
addition to any credit losses. Total reserves equal $8.4 million as of December
31, 1993.
F-29
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 13--COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES--(CONTINUED)
The Bank conducts portions of its operations from leased facilities. All of the
Bank's leases are operating leases. At December 31, 1993, aggregate minimum
rental commitments on operating leases with noncancelable terms in excess of
one year were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------
(Dollars in AMOUNT
thousands) ---------
<S> <C>
YEAR OF MATURITY:
1994 $ 3,218
1995 2,751
1996 2,759
1997 2,830
1998 2,709
Thereafter 10,842
---------
$25,109
=========
</TABLE>
Operating expense includes rent expense of $3.0 million in 1993, $2.8 million
in 1992, and $2.7 million in 1991.
NOTE 14--STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA")
required the OTS to implement a system requiring regulatory sanctions against
institutions that are not adequately capitalized, with the sanctions growing
more severe, the lower the institution's capital. Under FDICIA, the OTS issued
regulations establishing specific capital ratios for five separate capital
categories as set forth below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------------
CORE CAPITAL TO CORE CAPITAL TO TOTAL CAPITAL TO
ADJUSTED TOTAL RISK WEIGHTED RISK WEIGHTED
ASSETS (LEVERAGE) RATIO ASSET RATIO ASSETS RATIO
----------------------- ------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Well capitalized 5% or above 6% or above 10% or above
Adequately capitalized 4% or above 4% or above 8% or above
Undercapitalized Under 4% Under 4% Under 8%
Significantly
undercapitalized Under 3% Under 3% Under 6%
Critically
undercapitalized Ratio of tangible equity to adjusted total assets of 2% or less
</TABLE>
The following tables summarize the capital ratios of the adequately capitalized
category and Fidelity's regulatory capital at March 31, 1994 and December 31,
1993 as compared to such ratios. As indicated in the tables, Fidelity's capital
levels exceeded the three minimum capital ratios of the adequately capitalized
category for both periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, 1994
CORE CAPITAL TO CORE CAPITAL TO TOTAL CAPITAL TO
ADJUSTED TOTAL RISK WEIGHTED RISK WEIGHTED
ASSETS ASSETS ASSETS
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
(Dollars in thousands) ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fidelity's regulatory
capital $ 166,700 4.04% $ 166,700 5.98% $ 253,500 9.10%
Adequately capitalized
requirement 165,100 4.00% 111,500 4.00% 222,900 8.00%
---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Excess capital $ 1,600 0.04% $ 55,200 1.98% $ 30,600 1.10%
========== ========= ========== ========= ========== =========
Adjusted assets (1) $4,126,500 $2,786,600 $2,786,600
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
F-30
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 14--STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY--(CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 1993
CORE CAPITAL TO CORE CAPITAL TO TOTAL CAPITAL TO
ADJUSTED TOTAL RISK WEIGHTED RISK WEIGHTED
ASSETS (LEVERAGE) RATIO ASSET RATIO ASSETS RATIO
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
----------- ------- ----------- ------ ---------- -----
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fidelity's regulatory
capital $ 182,100 4.15% $ 182,100 6.27% $ 270,600 9.32%
Adequately capitalized
requirement 175,500 4.00% 116,100 4.00% 232,300 8.00%
----------- ------ ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Excess capital $ 6,600 0.15% $ 66,000 2.27% $ 38,300 1.32%
=========== ====== ========== ===== ========== =====
Adjusted assets (1) $4,388,400 $2,903,600 $2,903,600
=========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- - - -------
(1) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(a) for purposes of core capital
requirements, and for purposes of risk-based capital requirements, refers
to the term "risk-weighted assets" as defined in 12 C.F.R. section
567.1(bb).
Although the Bank was deemed adequately capitalized at December 31, 1993, at
such date, absent $28 million in capital contributed to the Bank by Citadel
during 1993, the Bank would have had to significantly reduce its assets or the
Bank would not have met the 4% core capital to adjusted total assets ratio
requirement of the adequately capitalized category and thus would have been
classified as undercapitalized for purposes of the OTS' prompt corrective
action regulations.
The OTS capital regulations, as required by the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), include three separate minimum
capital requirements for the savings institution industry--a "tangible capital
requirement," a "leverage limit" and a "risk-based capital requirement." These
capital standards must be no less stringent than the capital standards
applicable to national banks. The OTS also has the authority, after giving the
affected institution notice and an opportunity to respond, to establish
individual minimum capital requirements ("IMCR") for a savings institution
which are higher than the industry minimum requirements, upon a determination
that an IMCR is necessary or appropriate in light of the institution's
particular circumstances, such as if the institution is expected to have losses
resulting in capital inadequacy, has a high degree of exposure to credit risk,
or has a high amount of nonperforming loans. The OTS has proposed a regulation
that would add to the list of circumstances in which an IMCR may be appropriate
for a savings association the following: a high degree of exposure to
concentration of credit risk or risks arising from nontraditional activities,
or failure to adequately monitor and control the risks presented by
concentration of credit and nontraditional activities.
F-31
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 14--STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY--(CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes the regulatory capital requirements for Fidelity
under FIRREA at December 31, 1993, but does not reflect the required future
phasing out of certain assets, including (a) investments in, and loans to,
subsidiaries which may presently be engaged in activities not permitted for
national banks, and (b) for risk-based capital, real estate held for investment
(the impact of which the Bank believes is immaterial). The impact of certain
proposed regulations is also not reflected in the following table. As indicated
in the table, Fidelity's capital levels exceed all three of the currently
applicable minimum capital requirements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 1993
CURRENT RISK-
TANGIBLE CAPITAL CORE CAPITAL BASED CAPITAL
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(Dollars in thousands)
Stockholder's equity(1) $ 182,300 $ 182,300 $ 182,300
Adjustments:
Intangible assets (2,100) -- --
Nonincludable subsidiar-
ies (200) (200) (200)
General valuation allow-
ance -- -- 36,700
Qualifying subordinated
notes -- -- 59,200
Equity investments -- -- (7,400)
---------- ---------- ----------
Regulatory capital(2) 180,000 4.10% 182,100 4.15% 270,600 9.32%
Required minimum 65,800 1.50% 131,700 3.00% 232,300 8.00%
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Excess capital $ 114,200 2.60% $ 50,400 1.15% $ 38,300 1.32%
========== ===== ========== ===== ========== =====
Adjusted assets(3) $4,386,300 $4,388,400 $2,903,600
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) Fidelity's total stockholder's equity, in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, was 4.16% of its total assets at December
31, 1993.
(2) At periodic intervals, both the OTS and the FDIC routinely examine the Bank
as part of their legally prescribed oversight of the industry. Based on
their examinations, the regulators can direct that the Bank's financial
statements be adjusted in accordance with their findings.
(3) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(a) for purposes of tangible and core
capital requirements, and for purposes of risk-based capital requirements,
refers to the term "risk-weighted assets" as defined in 12 C.F.R. section
567.1(bb).
Citadel is actively pursuing a new restructuring and recapitalization plan
designed to (i) dispose of substantially all of the Bank's nonperforming assets
as of March 31, 1994, (ii) improve the capital of the Bank, (iii) consummate a
series of affiliate transactions, and (iv) redeem $60 million Subordinated
Notes. Such plan is collectively referred to as Fidelity's Restructuring and
Recapitalization.
The Bank does not intend to implement the above-described bulk problem asset
dispositions in the absence of financial investors who are able to infuse
additional core capital into the Bank. Any such acquisition will also require
the approval of Citadel's Board, as well as the OTS, which will condition its
approval in part on the adequacy of the capital of the Bank after the
Restructuring and Recapitalization.
Fidelity's ability to pay dividends is limited by applicable laws and
regulations. Given Fidelity's current capital levels, any dividend would
require regulatory approval.
F-32
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 14--STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY--(CONTINUED)
OTS examinations
In January 1994, the Bank received reports of the various regular examinations
conducted by the OTS in 1993. As a result of the findings of the OTS in its
safety and soundness examination of the Bank, Fidelity will be subject to
higher examination assessments and is subject to additional regulatory
restrictions including, but not limited to, (a) a prohibition, absent prior OTS
approval, on increases in total assets during any quarter in excess of an
amount equal to net interest credited on deposit liabilities during the
quarter; (b) a requirement that the Bank submit to the OTS for prior review and
approval the names of proposed new directors and executive officers and
proposed employment contracts with any director or senior officer; (c) a
requirement that the Bank submit to the OTS for prior review and approval any
third-party contract outside the normal course of business; and (d) the ability
of the OTS, in its discretion, to require 30 days' prior notice of all
transactions between Fidelity and its affiliates (including Citadel).
The OTS also expressed concern in a number of specific areas principally
relating to asset quality, asset review administration and the resulting
negative impact on capital levels and earnings, as well as management
effectiveness in certain areas. Management believes that the proposed
Restructuring, together with other actions taken by management in response to
the concerns raised by the OTS, will be responsive to most of the concerns
raised by the OTS.
Other Equity Transactions
In March 1993, Citadel completed a rights offering in which approximately $31.4
million of capital, net of expenses was raised. Of that amount, $18.0 million
was contributed to the capital of Fidelity in the first quarter of 1993 and
additional $10.0 million was contributed in the fourth quarter of 1993.
The Bank paid a cash dividend of $1.0 million in the third quarter of 1992 to
Citadel and during the fourth quarter of 1992, Fidelity paid a dividend in kind
to Citadel consisting of its equity ownership of its securities brokerage
subsidiary, Gateway. These dividends reduced Fidelity's capital by $2.1 million
and had an immaterial effect on the Bank's tangible, core and risk-based
capital.
F-33
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 15--QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER YEAR
(Dollars in thousands) -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1993:
Interest income $ 78,187 $ 73,591 $ 69,098 $ 68,455 $289,331
Interest expense 49,407 46,819 43,781 48,487 188,494
Provision for estimated loan
losses 7,500 14,500 19,500 23,600 65,100
Provision for estimated real
estate losses 1,000 16,000 4,000 9,200 30,200
Gains (losses) on sales of
loans, net 395 225 (34) (392) 194
Gains (losses) on sales of
mortgage-backed securities,
net -- 1,543 917 (1,118) 1,342
Gains (losses) on sales of
investment securities, net -- 1,946 17 (2,001) (38)
Net earnings (loss) 206 (14,734) (14,357) (37,002) (65,887)
1992:
Interest income $104,910 $ 96,824 $ 86,743 $ 82,238 $370,715
Interest expense 69,856 61,266 56,331 52,671 240,124
Provision for estimated loan
losses 6,970 7,656 32,660 3,894 51,180
Provision for estimated real
estate losses 2,030 2,344 6,340 7,106 17,820
Gains on sales of loans, net 353 284 403 77 1,117
Net earnings (loss) 6,505 5,277 (14,755) 3,260 287
1991:
Interest income $137,141 $133,564 $128,065 $121,282 $520,052
Interest expense 105,770 98,287 89,952 84,505 378,514
Provision for estimated loan
losses 3,924 5,417 36,502 4,000 49,843
Provision for estimated real
estate losses 1,076 558 3,903 2,000 7,537
Gains on sales of loans, net -- 114 256 1,748 2,118
Gains on sales of mortgage-
backed securities, net -- 1,008 -- 7,985 8,993
Gains on sales of investment
securities, net -- 1 -- -- 1
Net earnings (loss) 5,310 7,418 (13,736) 9,112 8,104
</TABLE>
During the fourth quarter of 1993, Fidelity wrote down the carrying value of
its intangible assets by $14.0 million. See Note 7.
NOTE 16--NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE
In January 1994, the greater Los Angeles area was seriously affected by a major
earthquake and attendant aftershocks, centered in the San Fernando Valley.
Because the Bank's main operations are located near the most seriously affected
areas, and a substantial number of its customers are located in the most
seriously affected areas, management has initiated efforts to evaluate the
effect of the earthquake on the Bank's operations and customers.
The Bank's portfolio includes loans and REO with a net book value of
approximately $937 million secured by or comprised of 1,414 multifamily (5
units or more), 15 commercial, and 2,313 single family and multifamily (2 to 4
units) collateral properties in the primary earthquake areas. After the
earthquake, the Bank's appraisers surveyed all of Fidelity's multifamily and
commercial properties located in these areas and identified 231 properties,
representing loans and REO with a net book value of $140 million, with more
than "cosmetic" damage. Of such 231 properties, 204 properties related to the
Bank's loans and REO with a net book value of $124 million were identified as
having "possible serious damage" and an additional 27 properties with a net
book value of $16 million were identified as "actually or potentially
condemned". The Bank commissioned structural and building engineers or building
inspectors to estimate the cost of repairs to properties in these two
categories. The cost of repairs has been
F-34
<PAGE>
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
(INFORMATION AS OF MARCH 31, 1994 AND 1993 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
IS UNAUDITED)
NOTE 16--NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE--(CONTINUED)
preliminarily estimated to be $5.7 million and $11.1 million, respectively. Of
this total $16.8 million, approximately $6.0 million of seismic damage exceeds
the principal balance on the collateral properties' respective loans.
Accordingly, the Bank currently would not expect its losses due to the
earthquake to exceed $10.8 million with respect to its commercial and
multifamily properties. The Bank expects the actual losses payable by the Bank
to be lower because many repair costs may be borne by the borrowers, who in
addition to their own funds, may have access to government assistance and/or
earthquake insurance proceeds. As part of its normal internal asset review
process, the Bank will adjust its reserves as its losses become quantifiable.
In addition to the multifamily and commercial assets referenced above, the Bank
has identified 2,313 single family and multifamily (2 to 4 units) assets in the
affected areas. 173 borrowers with unpaid principal balances totaling $29.4
million called in to report damages through February 8, 1994. The Bank has
commenced inspection of these properties and continues to assess damages and
potential earnings and loss impact with respect to these properties.
The earthquake will also have some adverse affect on loan originations and the
sale of financial services in the retail branch network in the near term. In
addition, physical damage was sustained at some of the Bank administrative and
branch office facilities located in the Los Angeles area, however, only one
Bank-owned building in the San Fernando Valley region of Los Angeles sustained
major damage. It is estimated that necessary repairs to all affected
facilities, net of anticipated insurance reimbursement, shall not exceed $0.5
million. Other potential financial impacts of the earthquake include additional
personnel costs, property inspection costs, and others. Based upon the
information gathered to date, the total estimated cost to the Bank for these
items is not expected to be material.
NOTE 17--SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Pending Litigation
On March 4, 1994, The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), one of four lenders
under Fidelity's $60 million Subordinated Loan Agreement, sued Fidelity,
Citadel and Citadel's Chairman of the Board, alleging, among other things, that
the transfer of assets pursuant to the Restructuring would constitute a breach
of the Subordinated Loan Agreement, and seeking to enjoin the Restructuring and
to recover damages in unspecified amounts. In addition, the lawsuit alleges
that past responses of Citadel and Fidelity to requests by Chase for
information regarding the Restructuring violate certain provisions of the
Subordinated Loan Agreement and that such alleged violations, with the passage
of time, have become current defaults under the Subordinated Loan Agreement. In
June 1994, the Bank, Citadel, Chase and the other lenders entered into a
settlement agreement to provide, among other things, for the dismissal of the
Chase lawsuit with prejudice and delivery of mutual releases between Citadel,
Fidelity and Chase. Mutual releases were executed on June 17, 1994. Fidelity
has been advised by legal counsel and counsel for Chase that the dismissal with
prejudice was filed on June 20, 1994. As a part of the settlement agreement all
four holders of the Subordinated Notes have agreed to permit Fidelity, subject
to certain conditions, to redeem the Subordinated Notes and to terminate the
Subordinated Loan Agreement. The redemption would occur concurrently with the
closing of Fidelity's recapitalization at a redemption price equal to the
Subordinated Notes' unpaid principal balance and accrued interest, plus a
variable recapitalization fee which ranges from $1.0 million to $4.95 million
based upon the amount of consideration to be received and retained by Citadel
in the Restructuring and Recapitalization. If the Restructuring and
Recapitalization is not consummated, then any party to the settlement agreement
may, in its sole and absolute discretion, terminate the settlement agreement
without any liability to any other party upon written notice to the other
parties. Therefore, if the Restructuring and Recapitalization is not
consummated, it may have an impact on the settlement agreement, the capital
position of the Bank, cross default provisions under the Bank's other debt
agreements and the guarantee by Citadel. Accordingly, no adjustments that may
result from the ultimate resolution of this uncertainty have been made in the
accompanying financial statements (see Notes 10 and 14).
F-35
<PAGE>
LOGO
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE OFFERING CIRCULAR
ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The estimated costs and expenses payable by the Bank in connection with
registration, issuance and distribution of the Class A Common Stock and Class
C Common Stock offered hereby, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
OTS Filing Fee....................................................... $39,828
NASD Fee............................................................. 12,050
Printing and Engraving Expenses...................................... *
Legal Fees and Expenses.............................................. *
Accounting Fees and Expenses......................................... *
Fees and Expenses of Transfer Agent.................................. *
Miscellaneous Expenses............................................... *
-------
Total............................................................ *
=======
</TABLE>
--------
* To be supplied by Amendment.
ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
12 C.F.R. Section 545.121 of the rules and regulations of the OTS authorizes
the Bank to indemnify its officers, directors and employees in accordance with
certain requirements specified in such rules and regulations and subject to
prior OTS review. In addition, the Bylaws of the Bank contain provisions
relating to indemnification of officers, directors, employees and agents of
the Bank. The officers and directors of the Bank are covered by directors' and
officers' insurance insuring them against liability they may incur in their
capacities as such, subject to 12 C.F.R. Section 545.121 of the rules and
regulations of the OTS.
ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During the past three years, there have been no sales of securities of the
Bank, whether registered or unregistered.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Exhibits.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
----------- -----------
<C> <S>
*1.1 Form of Investors' Purchase Agreement between the Bank and each
prospective investor
(to be attached as Annex A to the Offering Circular).
*1.2 Form of Placement Agency Agreement.
*3.1 Charter S of Fidelity.
*3.2 Bylaws of Fidelity.
Amended and Restated Charter S of Fidelity Federal Bank, A
*3.3 Federal Savings Bank.
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Fidelity Federal Bank, A Federal
*3.4 Savings Bank.
*4.1 Specimen of Class A Common Stock Certificate.
*4.2 Specimen of Class B Common Stock Certificate.
*4.3 Specimen of Class C Common Stock Certificate.
*10.1 Registration Rights Agreement.
*10.2 Citadel Stockholders' Agreement.
List of Subsidiaries of Fidelity Federal Bank, A Federal Savings
*21 Bank.
23.1 Consent of Deloitte and Touche (auditors).
*23.2 Consent of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.
*24 Power of Attorney (set forth in Page II-3).
</TABLE>
*(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
- - - --------
* To be filed by Amendment.
II-1
<PAGE>
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS
The Bank hereby undertakes that:
1. For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), the information omitted from the form of
Offering Circular filed as part of this Form OC in reliance upon Part 563g
of the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS")
and contained in a form of Offering Circular filed by Bank pursuant to Part
563g of the rules and regulations of the OTS shall be deemed to be part of
this Form OC as of the time it was declared effective.
2. For the purpose of determining any liability under the Act, each post-
effective amendment that contains a form of Offering Circular shall be
deemed to be a new Offering Circular on Form OC relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
The Bank hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing
specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and
registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under Part 563g of the
rules and regulations of the OTS may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Bank pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Section 545.121, or
otherwise, the Bank has been advised that in the opinion of the Office of
Thrift Supervision such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in Part 563g of the rules and regulations of the OTS and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such
liabilities (other than the payment by the Bank of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the Bank in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director,
officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the Bank will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has
been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in Part 563g of the rules and regulations of the OTS and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The Bank hereby undertakes, in connection with any distribution of the
offering circular, to have a preliminary or effective offering circular
including the information required by Part 563g of the rules and regulations
of the OTS distributed to all persons expected to be mailed confirmations of
sale not less than 48 hours prior to the time such confirmations are expected
to be mailed.
II-2
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 563G OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE
OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, THE BANK HAS DULY CAUSED THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
FORM OC TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY
AUTHORIZED, IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON THIS 20TH DAY OF
JUNE, 1994.
FIDELITY FEDERAL BANK, A FEDERAL
SAVINGS BANK
Richard M. Greenwood*
By:___________________________________
RICHARD M. GREENWOOD DIRECTOR,
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF PART 563G OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE
OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM OC HAS BEEN SIGNED
BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.
SIGNATURE CAPACITY DATE
Richard M. Greenwood* President, Chief June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------ Executive Officer,
RICHARD M. GREENWOOD Chairman and
Director
(Principal
Executive Officer)
Senior Vice June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------ President,
ANDRE S.W. SHIH Treasurer and
Acting Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
Heidi Wulfe* Senior Vice June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------ President,
HEIDI WULFE Controller and
Chief Accounting
Officer (Principal
Accounting
Officer)
Donald R. Boulanger* Director June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------
DONALD R. BOULANGER
Peter W. Geiger* Director June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------
PETER W. GEIGER
Mel Goldsmith* Director June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------
MEL GOLDSMITH
Ralph B. Perry III* Director June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------
RALPH B. PERRY III
Zelbie Trogden* Director June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------
ZELBIE TROGDEN
Alfred Villasenor, Jr.* Director June 20, 1994
- - - ------------------------------------
ALFRED VILLASENOR, JR.
Andre S.W. Shih
*By ________________________________
ANDRE S.W. SHIH
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER
AND
ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
II - 3
