<PAGE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement [_] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE
COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY
RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12
Murphy Oil Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Murphy Oil Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF MURPHY OIL CORP. APPEARS HERE]
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
To the Stockholders of
Murphy Oil Corporation:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Murphy Oil Corporation will be held at
the South Arkansas Arts Center, 110 East 5th Street, El Dorado, Arkansas, on
Wednesday, May 12, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, for the
following purposes:
To elect directors to serve for the ensuing year.
To approve or disapprove the action of the Board of Directors in
appointing KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors for 1999.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 1999, the
record date fixed by the Board of Directors of the Company, will be entitled
to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment thereof. A list of
all stockholders entitled to vote is on file at the offices of the Company,
200 Peach Street, El Dorado, Arkansas 71730.
Please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card promptly.
Walter K. Compton
Secretary
El Dorado, Arkansas
March 30, 1999
<PAGE>
PROXY STATEMENT
SOLICITATION March 30, 1999
The solicitation of the enclosed proxy is made on behalf of the Board of
Directors of Murphy Oil Corporation (the "Company") for use at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 1999. It is expected that this
Proxy Statement and related materials will first be mailed to stockholders on
or about March 30, 1999.
The address of the Company's Executive Offices is 200 Peach Street, P.O. Box
7000, El Dorado, Arkansas 71731-7000.
VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or
represented by proxy at the meeting is required for approval of matters
presented at the meeting. Your executed proxy will be voted at the meeting,
unless you (i) revoke it at any time before the vote by filing a revocation
with the Secretary of the Company, (ii) duly execute a proxy card bearing a
later date, or (iii) appear at the meeting and vote in person. Proxies
returned to the Company, votes cast other than in person, and written
revocations will be disqualified if received after commencement of the
meeting.
Votes cast by proxy or in person at the meeting will be counted by the
persons appointed by the Company to act as election inspectors for the
meeting. The election inspectors will treat shares represented by properly
signed and returned proxies that reflect abstentions as shares that are
present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a
quorum and for purposes of determining the outcome of any other business
submitted at the meeting to the stockholders for a vote. Abstentions, however,
do not constitute a vote "for" or "against" any matter and thus will be
disregarded in the calculation of "votes cast."
The election inspectors will treat shares referred to as "broker non-votes"
(i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees as to which instructions have not
been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and that
the broker or nominee does not have discretionary power to vote on a
particular matter) as shares that are present and entitled to vote for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. However, for purposes of
determining the outcome of any matter as to which the broker has physically
indicated on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote,
those shares will be treated as not present and not entitled to vote with
respect to that matter (even though those shares are considered entitled to
vote for quorum purposes and may be entitled to vote on other matters).
Unless specification to the contrary is made, the shares represented by the
enclosed proxy will be voted FOR all the nominees for director; and FOR the
approval of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors.
VOTING SECURITIES
On March 15, 1999, the record date for the meeting, the Company had
outstanding 44,952,331 shares of Common Stock, all of one class and each share
having one vote in respect of all matters to be voted on at the meeting. This
amount does not include 3,816,548 shares of treasury stock. Information as to
the amount of Common Stock owned by directors and officers and certain others
appears in the table under the heading "Certain Stock Ownership."
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Bylaws of the Company provide for eleven directors to be elected on
May 12, 1999. The Bylaws also provide that the directors elected at each
Annual Meeting of Stockholders shall serve until their successors are elected
and qualified.
1
<PAGE>
To the extent authorized by the proxies, the shares represented by the
proxies will be voted in favor of the election as directors of the eleven
nominees whose names are set forth below. If for any reason any of these
nominees is not a candidate when the election occurs, the shares represented
by such proxies will be voted for the election of the other nominees named and
may be voted for any substituted nominees. However, management of the Company
does not expect this to occur. All of management's nominees were elected at
the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The names of the nominees and certain
information as to them are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Principal occupation or
employment (for more Other public
than the past five years Director company
Name and age unless otherwise stated) since directorships
- ------------ -------------------------- -------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
B.R.R. Butler*# Managing Director, 1991 KS Biomedix Holdings
London, England Retired, of The British p.l.c.
Age: 69 Petroleum Company p.l.c. Guildford, England
George S. Dembroski+* Vice Chairman, Retired, of 1995 Cameco, Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, RBC Dominion Securities Saskatoon,
Canada Limited, Vice Chairman, Saskatchewan,
Age: 64 RBC Dominion Securities Canada
Limited from June, 1981 Electrohome Ltd.
to December 31, 1997. Kitchener, Ontario,
Canada
Claiborne P. President and Chief 1993 First United
Deming(S) Executive Officer of the Bancshares, Inc.
El Dorado, Arkansas Company since October 1, El Dorado, Arkansas
Age: 44 1994, Executive Vice
President and Chief
Operating Officer of the
Company from March 1,
1992 to October 1, 1994.
H. Rodes Hart(S)*# Chairman and Chief 1975 None
Nashville, Tennessee Executive Officer,
Age: 67 Franklin Industries Inc.,
engaged in the
manufacture of brick and
industrial minerals.
Vester T. Hughes, Partner, Hughes & Luce, 1973 None
Jr.+# Attorneys.
Dallas, Texas
Age: 70
C. H. Murphy, Jr.(S)* Chairman of the Board of 1950 None
El Dorado, Arkansas the Company from June 1,
Age: 79 1972 to October 1, 1994.
Michael W. President, Marmik Oil Com- 1977 Regions Financial
Murphy(S)+* pany, engaged in explora- Corp.
El Dorado, Arkansas tion for and production Birmingham, Alabama
Age: 51 of oil and gas. Presi-
dent, Murphy Motor Co.,
engaged in automobile
dealerships.
R. Madison Murphy(S) Chairman of the Board of 1993 Deltic Timber
El Dorado, Arkansas the Company since October Corporation
Age: 41 1, 1994, Executive Vice El Dorado, Arkansas
President and Chief Fi- First United
nancial and Administra- Bancshares, Inc.
tive Officer of the Com- El Dorado, Arkansas
pany from March 1, 1992
to October 1, 1994, Chief
Administrative position
added February 3, 1993.
William C. Nolan, Partner, Nolan and 1977 None
Jr.(S)+* Alderson, Attorneys.
El Dorado, Arkansas
Age: 59
Caroline G. Theus*# President, Inglewood Land 1985 None
Alexandria, and Development Company,
Louisiana a farming and land
Age: 55 holding corporation.
Lorne C. Webster+* Chairman of Prenor Group 1989 Consumers Packaging
Montreal, Quebec, Ltd., a financial Limited
Canada services corporation. Toronto, Ontario,
Age: 70 Canada
H. B. Fuller Company
St. Paul, Minnesota
</TABLE>
- --------
(S) Executive Committee
+ Audit Committee
* Executive Compensation and Nominating Committee
# Public Policy and Environmental Committee
2
<PAGE>
Claiborne P. Deming, C. H. Murphy, Jr., Michael W. Murphy, R. Madison
Murphy, William C. Nolan, Jr. and Caroline G. Theus are all related by blood.
Michael W. Murphy and R. Madison Murphy are sons of C. H. Murphy, Jr.,
Claiborne P. Deming and William C. Nolan, Jr. are nephews of C. H. Murphy,
Jr., and Caroline G. Theus is a niece of C. H. Murphy, Jr. These six nominees,
their spouses, and members of their immediate families directly or indirectly
own in the aggregate approximately 25% of the outstanding Common Stock of the
Company and may be considered the controlling persons of the Company. See also
"Certain Stock Ownerships."
Committees
The standing committees of the Board of Directors are the Executive
Committee, the Audit Committee, the Executive Compensation and Nominating
Committee, and the Public Policy and Environmental Committee. The Executive
Committee is empowered to exercise certain functions of the Board of Directors
when the Board is not in session. The Audit Committee's functions include
supervision and review of the results and scope of the work of the Company's
independent auditors and the Company's internal Audit Division. The Committee
meets with representatives of the independent auditors and with members of the
internal Audit Division for these purposes. The Executive Compensation and
Nominating Committee administers the Company's Stock Incentive Plan and
reviews generally the compensation of all executive and key personnel of the
Company and subsidiaries. This committee specifically determines the
compensation of the Chairman of the Board, the President, and certain other
officers.
Other duties and authority of the Executive Compensation and Nominating
Committee, as fixed by the Board of Directors, are as follows:
"The Executive Compensation and Nominating Committee shall have the power
to: propose and consider suggestions as to candidates for membership on the
Board; review and propose to the Board criteria for Board membership and
responsibilities; periodically recommend to the Board candidates for
vacancies on the Board due to resignations or retirements or due to such
standards for composition of Board membership as may from time to time
legally prevail; review and recommend to the Board such modifications to
the prevailing Board of Directors retirement policy as may be deemed
appropriate in light of contemporary standards; and propose to the Board on
or before the February meeting of each year a slate of directors for
submission to the stockholders at the annual meeting."
Stockholders desiring to recommend candidates for membership on the Board of
Directors for consideration by the Executive Compensation and Nominating
Committee should address their recommendations to: Executive Compensation and
Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors, c/o Secretary, Murphy Oil
Corporation, P.O. Box 7000, El Dorado, Arkansas 71731-7000.
The Public Policy and Environmental Committee provides review and oversight
of the Company's environmental, health and safety compliance policies,
programs and practices.
Meetings and Attendance
During 1998 there were six meetings of the Board of Directors, thirteen
meetings of the Executive Committee, two meetings of the Audit Committee, two
meetings of the Executive Compensation and Nominating Committee, and one
meeting of the Public Policy and Environmental Committee. All nominees except
C. H. Murphy, Jr. and H. Rodes Hart attended a minimum of 75% of the total
number of meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees on which they
served.
Compensation of Directors
The Company has a standard arrangement for compensation of directors who are
not also employees of the Company. Under this arrangement, for fiscal year
1998, nonemployee directors were compensated at the rate of $30,000 per annum
plus $1,000 for each meeting attended of the Board, the Audit Committee, the
3
<PAGE>
Executive Compensation and Nominating Committee, or the Public Policy and
Environmental Committee. The Chairman of the Board is paid the above plus an
additional $50,000 per annum. No compensation is paid for attendance at
meetings of the Executive Committee. The Company also reimburses directors for
travel, lodging and related expenses they incur in attending Board and
Committee meetings.
The Company adopted a retirement plan for nonemployee directors (the
"Director Retirement Plan") effective May 1, 1994. The Director Retirement
Plan provides a retirement benefit to any nonemployee director with at least
five (5) years of service if retirement occurs at or after the age of 72, or
with at least ten (10) years of service if retirement occurs prior to the age
of 72. The Director Retirement Plan will pay an annual benefit equal to the
annual retainer in effect at the time of the director's retirement. Benefits
will be paid for a period equal to years of service. Payment of retirement
benefits will be in the form of quarterly payments which will commence on the
first day of the calendar quarter following the later of the director's
attainment of age 65 or actual retirement from the Board. If a director dies
prior to retirement from the Board, no benefits will be paid under this plan.
In the event a director dies after retirement from the Board, benefits will be
paid to the surviving spouse, but in no event will the total of such benefits
exceed ten (10) years. If there is no surviving spouse, no benefits will be
paid to any other party, beneficiary or estate.
CERTAIN STOCK OWNERSHIPS
The following table and related text sets forth information, by the
categories listed, concerning the number of shares of Common Stock of the
Company at February 1, 1999 owned by each director or nominee, Named
Executives (as hereinafter defined), directors, nominees and officers as a
group, and each person known to the Company to own as much as 5% of the
Company's Common Stock:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Type of Ownership
-----------------------------------------------------------
Voting and
investment
Personal, power only, Subject to
with full Personal, Spouse and not options Percent of
voting and Personal, as in Company and other included in exercisable outstanding
investing beneficiary 401(k) household other within (if greater
Name power of trust(s) Plan members(1) columns(2) 60 days Total than .09)
---- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
B.R.R. Butler........... 2,000 -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 --
George S. Dembroski..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Claiborne P. Deming..... 111,300(3) 382,384 15,781 97,522 831,918 85,639 1,524,544(4) 3.4(4)
H. Rodes Hart........... -- -- -- -- 246,670 -- 246,670 --
Vester T. Hughes, Jr.... 3,474 -- -- -- -- -- 3,474 --
C. H. Murphy, Jr. ...... -- -- -- -- 3,654,709 -- 3,654,709(4) 8.1(4)
Michael W. Murphy....... 93,695 307,455 -- 32,049 28,727 -- 461,926(4) 1.0(4)
R. Madison Murphy....... 97,079 520,768 2,364 82,736 2,312,469 -- 3,015,416(4) 6.7(4)
William C. Nolan, Jr.... 162,403 127,858 -- 500 363,050 -- 653,811 1.5
Caroline G. Theus....... 105,430 161,342 -- 14,674 678,530 -- 959,976 2.1
Lorne C. Webster........ 100 -- -- -- 5,620 -- 5,720 --
Herbert A. Fox, Jr...... 14,442(3) -- 8,325 110 -- 31,640 54,517 --
Enoch L. Dawkins........ 10,827(3) 408 2,364 -- -- 35,800 49,399 --
Steven A. Cosse......... 10,326(3) -- 2,066 -- -- 31,640 44,032 --
Ronald W. Herman........ 11,672(3) -- 758 -- -- 22,580 35,010 --
All directors, five
named executives and
three other officers as
a group................ 638,967(5) 1,500,215 38,389 227,591 6,347,722 228,959 8,981,843 20.0
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes shares directly owned and shares owned as beneficiary of trusts.
(2) Includes shares held as trustee for others and shares owned by a
corporation or other organization of which the named person is an officer.
(3) Included are shares of "restricted stock" awarded in 1996 and 1998
pursuant to the Company's 1992 Stock Incentive Plan. Such shares are
subject to vesting requirements, but the recipients are entitled to vote
such shares upon their issuance. The amount of restricted stock for each
individual is: Deming 15,637; Fox 7,818; Dawkins 7,818; Cosse 7,818; and
Herman 3,909.
(4) This total includes shares also reported for others in this table because
voting and investment power is shared or held under trust or partnership
agreements. The amount of duplicate stock for each individual is: Deming
97,180 or .2%; C. H. Murphy, Jr. 1,550,691 or 3.4%; Michael W. Murphy
233,186 or .5%; and R. Madison Murphy 1,666,885 or 3.7%.
(5) This total includes 50,818 shares of restricted stock, which includes the
shares discussed in note 3 above and also shares of two officers not
individually named.
4
<PAGE>
The only persons or entities known to the Company to be the owners of more
than 5% of the Company's outstanding stock, as of December 31, 1998 (other
than C. H. Murphy, Jr., 200 Jefferson Avenue, El Dorado, Arkansas, and R.
Madison Murphy, 200 N. Jefferson Avenue, El Dorado, Arkansas, each of whose
holdings are described on page 4), are: First United Trust Company, N.A., Main
at Washington Streets, El Dorado, Arkansas; Capital Research and Management
Company, 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California; and Wellington
Management Company, LLP, 75 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts. First United
Trust Company, N.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of First United Bancshares,
Inc., has advised the Company that it, as trustee, exercised voting or
investment power over 2,526,414 shares of the Company's Common Stock,
representing 5.6% of the total outstanding. Capital Research and Management
Company, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 is deemed to be the beneficial owner of 6,224,000 shares
of the Company's Common Stock, representing 13.8% of the total outstanding, as
a result of acting as investment advisor to various investment companies
registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Wellington
Management Company, LLP, an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, exercises investment power over 2,478,500
shares of the Company's Common Stock, representing 5.51% of the total
outstanding, as a result of acting as investment advisor to its clients.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Under the securities laws of the United States, the Company's directors and
its executive officers are required to report their ownership of the Company's
Common Stock and any changes in that ownership to the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. Specific due dates for these
reports have been established and the Company is required to report in this
proxy statement any failure to file by these dates. In 1998, all officers and
directors satisfied their filing requirements except two Form 4's were not
filed on a timely basis for Mr. Webster. A Form 5 has been filed for Mr.
Webster which correctly reports his current ownership.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In 1998, the Company purchased crude oil from Marmik Oil Company in the
amount of $57,292 and from Munoco Company L.C. in the amount of $113,964.
Marmik Oil Company is 89% owned by Michael W. Murphy and Munoco Company L.C.
is an associate of William C. Nolan, Jr. Purchases from Marmik and Munoco were
made at market prices on terms no more favorable than those offered by
unaffiliated third party purchasers.
During 1998, the Company paid a retainer for legal services to Hughes &
Luce, L.L.P. of which Vester T. Hughes, Jr. is a partner. A retainer will also
be paid to the firm in 1999.
5
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information with respect to the individual
who served as the Company's chief executive officer during 1998 and the four
other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company at the end of
1998 (collectively, the "Named Executives"):
Summary Compensation Table
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-Term
Compensation
Annual Compensation Awards(4)
--------------------------------- --------------------- All
Other Restricted Securities Other
Annual Stock Underlying Compen-
Name and Principal Salary Bonus Compensation Awards Options sation
Position Year ($)(1) ($)(2) ($)(3) ($)(5) (#) ($)(6)
- ---------------------- ---- ------- ------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Claiborne P. Deming 1998 591,668 -- -- 495,000 25,000 57,417
President and Chief
Executive Officer, 1997 537,508 363,000 -- -- 60,000 40,614
Murphy Oil Corporation 1996 400,008 300,000 48,672 214,375 12,480 36,228
Herbert A. Fox, Jr. 1998 315,006 50,000 -- 247,500 15,000 30,292
Vice President, 1997 293,336 175,000 -- -- 30,000 21,556
Murphy Oil Corporation 1996 268,336 140,000 24,336 107,188 8,320 21,840
Enoch L. Dawkins 1998 325,002 -- -- 247,500 15,000 31,581
President, Murphy
Exploration & 1997 305,840 160,000 -- -- 30,000 23,353
Production Company (a 24,095
100% subsidiary) 1996 280,834 165,000 34,766 107,188 8,320
Steven A. Cosse 1998 267,091 -- -- 247,500 15,000 27,104
Senior Vice President
and General 1997 244,168 130,000 -- -- 30,000 17,929
Counsel, Murphy Oil
Corporation 1996 231,670 135,000 17,383 107,188 8,320 18,704
Ronald W. Herman 1998 205,002 -- -- 123,750 6,500 18,128
Controller, 1997 195,839 60,000 -- -- 15,000 14,043
Murphy Oil Corporation 1996 185,672 60,000 17,383 53,594 5,200 14,462
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes amounts of cash compensation earned and received by each listed
officer as well as amounts earned but deferred at the election of the
officer.
(2) Bonuses were awarded and paid after the end of the year in which they are
reported. Because these payments related to services rendered in the year
prior to payment, the Company reported bonuses as a component of
compensation expense in the prior year.
(3) Represents the amount of income tax reimbursements made by the Company in
1997 for restricted stock awards that vested in 1996.
(4) The number of outstanding stock options and restricted shares were
adjusted in 1997 due to the spin-off of Deltic Timber Corporation on
December 31, 1996. The number of Securities Underlying Options presented
represents the number of options including the spin-off adjustments. The
dollar amount shown for Restricted Stock Awards in 1996 represents the
dollar value of the grant on the date granted, calculated on the number of
restricted shares granted times the closing stock price on date of grant.
These anti-dilution adjustments were intended to preserve the economic
value of the stock options and restricted share awards at the time of the
spin-off. In the case of stock options, the adjustment was calculated by
multiplying the number of common shares under the original award by a
factor of 1.04, and dividing the original exercise price by the same
factor. The number of outstanding restricted shares were adjusted by
multiplying the number of Company shares under the original award by
1.1274.
(5) Represents the closing stock price of unrestricted stock on date of grant
($49.50 on February 3, 1998 and $42.875 on February 6, 1996) times the
number of restricted shares granted. Dividends are being paid on
restricted stock at the same rate paid to all shareholders. Awards are
subject to performance based conditions and are forfeited if grantee
terminates for any reason other than retirement, death or full disability.
None of the restricted stock awards vest in under five years from the date
of grant. Based on the results of specified financial objectives, all of
the restricted stock awards granted in 1994 were forfeited effective
December 31, 1998, and one-half of restricted stock awards granted in 1992
were forfeited effective December 31, 1996. On December 31, 1998, Mr.
Deming held a total of 15,637 nonvested restricted shares having a then
current value of $645,026; Messrs. Fox, Dawkins and Cosse each held a
total of 7,818 nonvested restricted shares having a then current value of
$322,493; and Mr. Herman held a total of 3,909 nonvested restricted shares
having a then current value of $161,246.
(6) The total amounts shown in this column for 1998 consist of the following:
Mr. Deming: $27,415--Dividends on nonvested restricted stock; $29,174--
Company contributions to defined contribution plan; and $828--Benefit
attributable to Company-provided term life insurance policy.
Mr. Fox; $13,706--Dividends on nonvested restricted stock; $15,758--Company
contributions to defined contribution plan; and $828--Benefit attributable
to Company-provided term life insurance policy.
Mr. Dawkins: $14,496--Dividends on nonvested restricted stock; $16,257--
Company contributions to defined contribution plan; and $828--Benefit
attributable to Company-provided term life insurance policy.
Mr. Cosse: $12,918--Dividends on nonvested restricted stock; $13,358--
Company contributions to defined contribution plan; and $828--Benefit
attributable to Company-provided term life insurance policy.
Mr. Herman: $7,050--Dividends on nonvested restricted stock; $10,250--
Company contributions to defined contribution plan; and $828--Benefit
attributable to Company-provided term life insurance policy.
6
<PAGE>
OPTION EXERCISES AND FISCAL YEAR-END VALUES
Shown below is information with respect to stock options exercised in fiscal
1998 and the fiscal year-end value of unexercised options for the Named
Executives:
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year
and FY-End Option Values
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised In-
Underlying Unexercised the-Money Options at FY-
Shares Options at FY-End (#) End ($)*
Acquired on Value ------------------------- -------------------------
Name Exercise (#) Realized ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ---- ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Claiborne P. Deming..... 997 $49,944 52,519 91,240 $186,926 $2,775
Herbert A. Fox, Jr...... -- -- 12,480 49,160 1,850 1,850
Enoch L. Dawkins........ -- -- 16,640 49,160 13,700 1,850
Steven A. Cosse......... -- -- 12,480 49,160 1,850 1,850
Ronald W. Herman........ -- -- 12,480 24,100 34,181 1,156
</TABLE>
- --------
* Represents market value of underlying securities at year-end less the
exercise price.
OPTION GRANTS
Shown below is further information on grants of stock options pursuant to
the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998
to the Named Executives:
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants
------------------------------------------------
% of Total
Number of Options
Securities Granted to Exercise Grant
Underlying Employees or Base Date
Options in Fiscal Price Expiration Present
Name Granted (#)(1)(2) Year ($/Sh) Date Value ($)(3)
- ---- ----------------- ---------- -------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Claiborne P. Deming..... 25,000 8.01% $49.75 02/03/08 $225,250
Herbert A. Fox, Jr...... 15,000 4.81% 49.75 02/03/08 135,150
Enoch L. Dawkins........ 15,000 4.81% 49.75 02/03/08 135,150
Steven A. Cosse......... 15,000 4.81% 49.75 02/03/08 135,150
Ronald W. Herman........ 6,500 2.08% 49.75 02/03/08 58,565
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) No stock appreciation rights were granted in 1998.
(2) Options granted in 1998 vest 50% at the end of two years and 100% at the
end of three years from the date of grant and are exercisable for a period
of 10 years from the date of grant.
(3) Values were based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model adapted for
use in valuing executive stock options. The actual value, if any, an
executive may realize will depend on the excess of the stock price over
the exercise price on the date the option is exercised. There is no
assurance that value realized by the executive will be at or near the
value estimated by the Black-Scholes model. The estimated values under
that model are based on arbitrary assumptions as to certain variables and
in 1998 included the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
. Risk-free rate of return 5.46%
. Stock volatility 17.27%
. Dividend yield 2.91%
. Expected life of option 5 years
</TABLE>
Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the above
assumptions, the options granted in 1998 have been valued at $9.01 per
share as of the grant date.
7
<PAGE>
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The members of the Executive Compensation and Nominating Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company during 1998 were Messrs. Butler, Dembroski,
Hart, C. H. Murphy, Jr., Michael W. Murphy, Nolan, and Webster and Ms. Theus.
C. H. Murphy, Jr. was Chairman of the Board of the Company from June 1, 1972
to October 1, 1994. In 1998, the Company purchased crude oil from Marmik Oil
Company in the amount of $57,292 and from Munoco Company L.C. in the amount of
$113,964. Marmik Oil Company is 89% owned by Michael W. Murphy and Munoco
Company L.C. is an associate of William C. Nolan, Jr. Purchases from Marmik
and Munoco were made at market prices on terms no more favorable than those
offered by unaffiliated third party purchasers.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT FOR 1998
The Executive Compensation and Nominating Committee (the "Committee") of the
Board of Directors of the Company, which is comprised entirely of independent,
outside directors, has prepared this Compensation Committee Report which
describes the guiding principles followed by the Company in establishing its
pay practices and reviews compensation decisions which were made during 1998
affecting the Named Executives.
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Principles
The Company's executive compensation programs and plans are based on
principles designed to align the interests of executives with those of
stockholders and provide a direct link with the Company's values, objectives,
business strategy and financial results. The following general guidelines have
been adopted by the Committee and have been used as the basic architecture for
all executive compensation and benefit arrangements for the Company:
. All programs are directed toward attracting and retaining key executives
who are critical to the long-term success of the Company and each of its
business units and who exhibit a high degree of business responsibility,
personal integrity and professionalism.
. These programs are designed to reward executives for both the short-term
and long-term achievements of Company and business unit objectives that
lead to the enhancement of shareholder value.
. All pay and benefit programs are intended to be competitive within each
industry segment, with upside opportunity and downside risk linked to the
achievement of annual and long-term performance objectives which are
regularly reviewed and approved by the Committee.
At the present time, executive compensation programs consist of base salary,
an annual cash incentive plan and long-term incentives in the form of both
stock options and performance-based restricted stock. The executive benefits
that are offered are typical of those provided by others in the industry. Each
of these compensation arrangements is briefly reviewed in the following
section.
Base Salary Practices
The Named Executives and other employees are compensated within established
salary range guidelines that are generally based on similar positions in
companies that are comparable to the Company in size, complexity, and industry
orientation. The actual base pay level for each officer is based on a
combination of experience, performance and other factors that are determined
to be important by the Committee. Each year, the Company participates in
salary surveys within each industry segment and from time to time uses the
services of outside consultants to further supplement its competitive
information. The petroleum industry survey in which the Company participates
contains over 25 corporations that the Committee believes are
8
<PAGE>
representative of the Company's labor market for management talent. The survey
is conducted by a major compensation consulting firm. Many of the companies in
the survey group are included in the S&P Oil (Domestic Integrated) Index line
on the performance graph as shown on page 11. The Committee generally targets
the base salary of most officers to be at or near the median (50th percentile)
of the competitive market. The actual salaries and the amount of increases for
1998 for the Named Executives were near the median levels of the salaries in
the referenced survey. The base salary of most officers is reviewed annually,
with the amount of any increases reflecting factors such as Company
performance, general economic conditions, marketplace compensation trends and
individual performance. In determining base salary and increase in salaries,
the most important criteria in the Committee's analysis are marketplace
comparisons and individual performance. Overall corporate performance,
including the Company's improvement in earnings and total shareholder return,
were also considered by the Committee in making salary adjustments in 1998.
Annual Incentive Compensation Program
The Company restructured its annual incentive compensation plan in 1996. The
plan concept follows many of the precepts of economic value added and measures
the Company's ability to earn a return on capital
that exceeds the weighted average cost of capital as well as the improvement
in the Company's return on capital. The specific performance measure used for
the 1998 performance year was return on capital employed. The targeted level
of return on capital employed was developed based upon a projection of the
Company's weighted average cost of capital. All participants in the plan,
including the Named Executives, were measured on this corporate-wide measure
of Company performance. In 1998, the Company did not meet the minimum
performance level of its return on capital employed performance target. As a
result, the Named Executives received no annual incentive award for the 1998
plan year under the plan's formula; however, one Named Executive did receive a
discretionary bonus for 1998.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Under the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1992 Plan") as approved by the
Company's stockholders, long-term incentives may be provided through stock
options, stock appreciation rights and performance-based restricted stock, all
designed to increase the stock ownership of management and link these key
individuals directly to stockholders. All long-term incentive awards granted
during 1998 were granted under the 1992 Plan. Where appropriate, the Committee
uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to determine the expected value
of stock options. Under the 1992 Plan, the Committee may award up to one-half
of one percent of the total issued and outstanding shares as of December 31 of
the immediately preceding year for executive long-term incentives. The Plan
also has a carryforward feature which allows the Committee to use unawarded
shares from years that were below the one-half of one percent threshold to
grant awards in a particular year that may exceed this utilization level. In
1998, the Company used this feature of the Plan and made grants which were
0.8% of total Company shares outstanding. The 1992 Plan provides that no more
than 50% of the shares may be granted as incentive stock options, and no more
than 50% can be granted as performance-based restricted stock.
A stock option granted under the Plan gives the executive the right to
purchase a specified number of shares of the Company's Common Stock at an
option price equal to the market price on the date the option was granted.
Options, which may be either nonqualified stock options or incentive stock
options, vest 50% at the end of two years and 100% at the end of three years
from the date of grant and are exercisable for a period of 10 years from the
date of grant. The size of option grants awarded each year is based on
competitive practices in general industry using comparative data provided by a
major compensation consulting firm. The Company's stock option grants in 1998
were between the 25th and 50th percentile levels of general industry
practices. In addition, the Committee considers the total number of grants
each executive has been awarded in recent years in determining whether to
grant additional stock options or performance-based restricted stock.
Nonqualified stock options were granted in 1998 to all Named Executives;
however, no stock appreciation rights were granted in 1998.
9
<PAGE>
On a biennial basis, the Company grants performance-based restricted shares
to key executives, including the Named Executives. These restricted share
grants are totally performance-based in that the restrictions will only be
lifted and the shares earned in the event that the Company meets or exceeds
its performance target. The performance target for restricted share grants is
the Company's total shareholder return as compared to a selected peer group of
integrated oil and gas companies over a five-year performance period. During
this five-year performance period executives are extended voting and dividend
rights on their restricted shares.
The combination of nonqualified stock options and performance-based
restricted stock grants are allocated on an approximate basis of 60% value in
stock options and 40% value in performance-based restricted shares. The
cumulative expected value of the total grants to Company executives in 1998
from both of the long-term incentive plan elements was equal to or less than
the 50th percentile of competitive general industry practices.
In 1997, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the 1992
Plan to limit the number of awards to any one individual and to specify the
performance criteria for performance-based restricted shares in compliance
with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Discussion of 1998 Compensation for the President and Chief Executive Officer
Claiborne P. Deming served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company for the complete fiscal year 1998. During 1998, the Committee made the
following determinations regarding Mr. Deming's compensation:
. Mr. Deming received a base salary adjustment during 1998. With this salary
adjustment, Mr. Deming's base salary approaches the median (50th
percentile) of the competitive market as reported to the Committee by a
major compensation consulting firm.
. As noted earlier, the Company restructured its annual incentive
compensation plan in 1996 to focus upon financial performance, as measured
by return on capital employed, which should lead to the enhancement of
shareholder value. As with other participants in the plan, Mr. Deming
earned no annual incentive award for 1998 under the plan due to the
Company's failure to meet the minimum performance level of its return on
capital employed target.
. In 1998, Mr. Deming received a grant of 25,000 nonqualified stock options
at an exercise price of $49.75, which was the fair market value of the
Company's stock on the date of the grant. These options will vest 50% two
years from the date of grant and 100% three years from the date of grant.
The option grant was made in recognition of both Mr. Deming's performance
and that of the Company in 1997 and early 1998. Mr. Deming's grant was
between the 25th and 50th percentiles of competitive practice based upon
survey data provided by a major compensation consulting firm. The
compensation consulting firm assisted the Committee in determining the size
of the stock option grant to Mr. Deming and all other Company executives.
. The Company granted performance-based restricted stock awards to selected
executives in 1998, including Mr. Deming. Such grants are made biennially
by the Company. The restricted share grants will be awarded, with a full
lifting of the restrictions, only if the Company's total shareholder return
over the ensuing five-year performance period as compared to selected peer
companies meets or exceeds the established performance target. In 1998, Mr.
Deming received a grant of 10,000 performanced-based restricted shares
based on his performance in 1997 and early 1998.
The Executive Compensation and Nominating Committee members during 1998 were
Messrs. Butler, Dembroski, Hart, C. H. Murphy, Jr., Michael W. Murphy, Nolan,
and Webster and Ms. Theus.
10
<PAGE>
SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION
The following line graph presents a comparison of the cumulative five-year
shareholder returns (including the reinvestment of dividends) for the Company,
the Standard and Poor's 500 Stock Index (S&P 500 Index) and the S&P Oil
(Domestic Integrated) Index.
[PERFORMANCE GRAPH APPEARS HERE]
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Murphy Oil Corporation $100 $110 $110 $153 $172 $135
S&P 500 Index 100 101 139 171 229 294
S&P Oil (Domestic Integrated) Index 100 105 119 151 180 146
</TABLE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data are provided by Standard & Poor's Compustat.
11
<PAGE>
RETIREMENT PLANS
The following table shows the estimated annual pension benefit payable, at
age 65, under Murphy Oil Corporation's Retirement Plan at December 31, 1998
for the salary and length of service indicated. The amounts shown are subject
to reduction for social security benefits.
Pension Plan Table--Murphy Oil Corporation Plan
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years of Service
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Remuneration(/1/) 15 20 25 30 35 40
- ----------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$150,000 $ 36,000 $ 48,000 $ 60,000 $ 72,000 $ 84,000 $ 96,000
200,000 48,000 64,000 80,000 96,000 112,000 128,000
250,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000(2) 160,000(2)
300,000 72,000 96,000 120,000 144,000(2) 168,000(2) 192,000(2)
350,000 84,000 112,000 140,000(2) 168,000(2) 196,000(2) 224,000(2)
400,000 96,000 128,000 160,000(2) 192,000(2) 224,000(2) 256,000(2)
450,000 108,000 144,000(2) 180,000(2) 216,000(2) 252,000(2) 288,000(2)
500,000 120,000 160,000(2) 200,000(2) 240,000(2) 280,000(2) 320,000(2)
600,000 144,000(2) 192,000(2) 240,000(2) 288,000(2) 336,000(2) 384,000(2)
700,000 168,000(2) 224,000(2) 280,000(2) 336,000(2) 392,000(2) 448,000(2)
800,000 192,000(2) 256,000(2) 320,000(2) 384,000(2) 448,000(2) 512,000(2)
- --------
(1) During 1998, the maximum compensation limit for qualified retirement
plans, as established by the Internal Revenue Service, was $160,000
($160,000 also for 1999).
(2) Exceeds presently allowable maximum legislative limits for annual pension
benefits under a defined benefit pension plan. In 1998, the maximum
benefit allowable was $130,000 ($130,000 also for 1999).
A portion of the benefits shown above would be paid under the Company's
Supplemental Benefit Plan to the extent such benefits exceed legislative
limitations.
The credited years of service for Messrs. Deming, Fox, Cosse and Herman are
twenty years, twenty-nine years, nineteen years and twenty-two years,
respectively.
As of January 1, 1992, employees of Murphy Exploration & Production Company,
formerly named Ocean Drilling & Exploration Company (ODECO), began
participating in the Company's plans. Prior to that time such employees
participated in similar plans of ODECO. Employees of the Company or one of its
100% owned subsidiaries who were previously included in the ODECO Retirement
Plan may receive a benefit upon retirement which is based on a combination of
the Company and ODECO plans. The following table indicates the estimated
annual benefit computed on a straight life annuity basis payable, at age 65,
under the ODECO plan for the salary and length of service indicated:
Pension Plan Table--ODECO Plan
<CAPTION>
Years of Service
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Remuneration 15 20 25 30 35 40
- ------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$200,000 $ 59,352 $ 79,082 $ 98,812 $118,542 $138,272* 158,002*
250,000 74,352 99,082 123,812 148,542* 173,272* 198,002*
300,000 89,352 119,082 148,812* 178,542* 208,272* 238,002*
350,000 104,352 139,082* 173,812* 208,542* 243,272* 278,002*
400,000 119,352 159,082* 198,812* 238,542* 278,272* 318,002*
</TABLE>
- --------
*Exceeds presently allowable maximum legislative limits for annual pension
benefits under a defined benefit pension plan.
The above tables do not reflect any reductions in retirement benefits that
would result from the selection of one of either plan's various available
survivorship options nor the actuarial reductions required by the plans for
retirement earlier than age 62.
12
<PAGE>
The credited years of service for Mr. Dawkins are thirty-three years.
It is not feasible to calculate the specific amount attributable to the
plans in respect to each employee. The Company had no required contributions
to the retirement plans in 1998 and therefore no contributions were made.
APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors desires that the stockholders indicate their approval
or disapproval of the Board's action in appointing KPMG LLP, Certified Public
Accountants, as independent auditors of the Company for the year 1999. KPMG
LLP has been serving the Company and its subsidiaries as independent auditors
for many years. The firm has advised the Company that its members have no
direct or indirect financial interest in the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. Members of the firm are expected to be present at the Annual
Meeting for the purpose of responding to inquiries by stockholders, and such
representatives will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to
do so.
In the event a majority of the stockholders voting should indicate
disapproval of the appointment of KPMG LLP, the adverse vote will be
considered as a directive to the Board of Directors to select other auditors
for the following year. Because of the difficulty and expense of making any
substitution of auditors during a year, it is contemplated that the
appointment for 1999 will be permitted to stand unless the Board finds other
good reason for making a change.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholder proposals for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the year
2000 must be received by the Company at its executive offices on or before
December 1, 1999 in order to be considered for inclusion in the proxy
materials.
OTHER INFORMATION
The management of the Company knows of no business other than that described
above that will be presented for consideration at the meeting. If any other
business properly comes before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons
named in the proxies to vote such proxies thereon in accordance with their
judgment.
The expense of this solicitation, including cost of preparing and mailing
this Proxy Statement, will be paid by the Company. Such expenses may also
include the charges and expenses of banks, brokerage houses and other
custodians, nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding proxies and proxy material
to beneficial owners of shares.
The above Notice and Proxy Statement are sent by order of the Board of
Directors.
Walter K. Compton
Secretary
El Dorado, Arkansas
March 30, 1999
PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY
IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE IS
REQUIRED IF IT IS MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA.
13
<PAGE>
PLEASE MARK VOTE IN OVAL USING DARK INK ONLY. [X]
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote "FOR" Each of the Listed Proposals.
1. Election of Directors--
B.R.R. Butler, G.S. Dembroski, C.P. Deming, H.R. Hart,V.T. Hughes, Jr., C.H.
Murphy, Jr., M.W. Murphy, R.M. Murphy, W.C. Nolan, Jr., C.G. Theus, and L.C.
Webster.
For All Withhold All For All
[_] [_] [_]
(Except Nominee(s) written below)
-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
2. Approve the appointment of KPMG LLP as auditors.
For Against Abstain
[_] [_] [_]
Dated: , 1999
--------------
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
Please sign exactly as your
name or names appear hereon.
For joint ac-counts, each owner
should sign. When signing as
executor, administrator,
attorney, trustee or guardian,
etc., please give your full
title. Please return promptly.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
/\FOLD AND DETACH HERE/\
<PAGE>
[MURPHY OIL CORPORATION LOGO APPEARS HERE]
PROXY SOLICITED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR ANNUAL MEETING, MAY 12, 1999
The stockholder(s) whose name(s) appears on the reverse side hereby appoints
R. Madison Murphy and Claiborne P. Deming, or each of them, as the
stockholder's proxy or proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote all
shares of Common Stock of Murphy Oil Corporation which the stockholder is
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the South
Arkansas Arts Center, 110 East 5th Street, El Dorado, Arkansas, on May 12,
1999, at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, and any adjournments thereof, as
fully as the stockholder could if personally present.
IMPORTANT -- This Proxy must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE ON THE
REVERSE SIDE, BUT IF NONE ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL
NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE, AND FOR PROPOSAL 2.
(continued on reverse side)
