DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
N-30D, 1994-08-23
Previous: NUVEEN TAX EXEMPT UNIT TRUST STATE SERIES 85, 485BPOS, 1994-08-23
Next: MERISEL INC /DE/, S-3, 1994-08-23




<PAGE>

                DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND

                            Two World Trade Center
                           New York, New York 10048

DEAR SHAREHOLDER:
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Strong economic growth and a shift in Federal Reserve Board monetary
policy during the first half of 1994 resulted in the sharpest increase in
interest rates in more than six years. At the beginning of the year, most
economic indicators were pointing toward a vigorous recovery. Concerns over
potential inflationary pressure developed as the job market approached full
employment and commodity prices remained volatile. The Federal Reserve Board
responded by tightening monetary policy. Between February and May, the
central bank raised the federal-funds rate--the interest rate banks charge
each other for overnight loans--from 3.00 percent to 4.25 percent in four
separate moves. In May, the discount rate--the interest rate the Federal
Reserve charges member banks for loans--was increased by 50 basis points to
3.50 percent.

   Long-term municipal bond yields, as measured by THE BOND BUYER Revenue
Bond Index,* were little changed between October and January. However, in
February and March the Index yield rose 89 basis points from 5.50 percent to
6.39 percent. During April, May and June the municipal market began to show
signs of stability, despite 15 to 20 basis point yield changes each month. At
the end of June the Index yielded 6.56 percent.

   The municipal market is also influenced by unique supply and demand
conditions. New-issue underwriting totaled a record $290 billion in 1993. The
pace of new-issue activity over the first half of 1994, however, slowed 40
percent to a projected annual rate of $180 billion. By way of comparison,
bond maturities and calls for redemptions will reduce municipal debt
outstanding by approximately $190 billion. This imbalance helped municipal
securities outperform their U.S. Treasury counterparts during the second
quarter.

PERFORMANCE

   For the six-month period ended June 30, 1994, Dean Witter Select Municipal
Reinvestment Fund paid shareholders tax-free income dividends totaling $0.33
per share. The Fund's total return for this period was -5.26 percent and is a
result of the portfolio's decline in value. Since inception the Fund has
provided shareholders with an attractive average annual total return of 9.04
percent. The Fund's net assets exceeded $91 million.

PORTFOLIO STRUCTURE

   The net short-term investment position at the end of June was 4.2 percent.
Refunded bonds with escrows set to be called within 10 years comprised
another 10 percent of the portfolio. Long-term investments were diversified
among 11 specific municipal sectors and 55 credits. The three largest sectors
in the portfolio were water & sewer, transportation facilities and
educational facilities revenue bonds, comprising 49 percent of net assets.
Ohio, New York, California, Maryland and Arizona are the five largest states
of issuance among the 26 states (including the District of Columbia and
Puerto Rico)

- ---------------
1 * THE BOND BUYER Revenue Bond Index is an arithmetic average of the yields of
25 selected municipal revenue bonds with 30-year maturities. Ratings of these
bonds range from Aa1 to Baa1, as measured by Moody's and AA+ to A-, as
measured by Standard & Poor's.


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

represented in the portfolio. The average maturity and call protection of the
Fund's long-term holdings were 19 years and 7 years, respectively. The credit
quality ratings of the long-term portfolio are summarized below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MOODY'S OR STANDARD & POOR'S
RATING                                PERCENT
- ----------------------------------  ---------
<S>                                    <C>
Aaa or AAA ........................     23
Aa or AA ..........................     29
A or A ............................     41
Baa or BBB ........................     2
Not rated .........................     5
</TABLE>

LOOKING AHEAD

   A continuation of low new-issue supply coupled with significant bond calls
and maturities should help support municipal bond values, as well as sustain
investor demand for municipal securities. However, the overall direction of
interest rates will primarily be determined by the strength of the economy,
the trend of inflation and the Federal Reserve Board's response to economic
conditions. The level of interest rates and bond redemption activity are the
key factors expected to influence the Fund's future results.

   We appreciate your ongoing support of Dean Witter Select Municipal
Reinvestment Fund and look forward to continuing to serve your investment
needs.

                                Very truly yours,

                            /s/ Charles A. Fiumefreddo

                                Charles A. Fiumefreddo
                                Chairman of the Board


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS June 30, 1994 (unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 PRINCIPAL
 AMOUNT (IN                                                                            COUPON    MATURITY
 THOUSANDS)                                                                             RATE      DATE          VALUE
- -----------                                                                            ------    --------       -----
<S>         <C>                                                                      <C>       <C>         <C>
            MUNICIPAL BONDS (95.8%)
            GENERAL OBLIGATION (5.1%)
$ 2,000     Washington Suburban Sanitation District, Maryland, General
             Construction Refg 1994 .................................................5.00 %     6/ 1/14    $ 1,733,680
  3,000     New York City, New York, 1990 Ser D .....................................6.00       8/ 1/07      2,910,000
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
  5,000                                                                                                      4,643,680
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES REVENUE (14.3%)
  2,000     Price-Elliot Research Park Inc, Arizona, Arizona State University
             Refg Ser 1991 (MBIA Insured) ...........................................7.00       7/ 1/21      2,093,680
  3,000     Georgetown University, District of Columbia, Ser 1993 ...................5.375      4/ 1/23      2,502,180
  2,000     Morgan State University, Maryland, Academic & Auxiliary Fees
             1990 Ser A (MBIA Insured) (Prerefunded) ................................7.00       7/ 1/20      2,217,360
  2,000     Massachusetts Health & Education Facilities Authority, Boston College
             Ser K ..................................................................5.25       6/ 1/18      1,728,900
  1,500     Rutgers--The State University, New Jersey, Refg Ser R ...................6.50       5/ 1/13      1,535,925
  2,000     New York State Dormitory Authority, State University Ser 1989 B  ........0.00       5/15/03      1,149,360
  1,000     Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, Oberlin College Ser 1993  ..5.375     10/ 1/15        888,070
  1,000     Loudon County Industrial Development Authority, Virginia, The George
             Washington University Refg Ser of 1992 .................................6.25       5/15/22        981,790
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
 14,500                                                                                                     13,097,265
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            ELECTRIC REVENUE (11.0%)
  1,000     Northern California Power Agency, Geothermal #3--1987 Refg Ser A
             (Crossover Refunded) ...................................................7.00       7/ 1/07      1,040,180
  2,500     Nebraska Public Power District, Power Supply 1993 Ser ...................6.125      1/ 1/15      2,419,300
  1,000     Fayetteville, North Carolina, Public Works Ser 1990 (FGIC Insured)
             (Prerefunded) ..........................................................6.50       3/ 1/14      1,081,060
    665     North Carolina Municipal Power Agency #1, Catawba Ser 1985 A  ...........7.00       1/ 1/20        680,395
  1,000     Austin, Texas, Utilities Refg Ser 1993 A ................................5.625      5/15/16        899,580
  2,000     Intermountain Power Agency, Utah, Refg 1985 Ser H .......................6.00       7/ 1/21      1,863,900
  1,000     Snohomish County Public Utilities District #1, Washington, Ser 1993
              (FGIC Insured) ........................................................6.00       1/ 1/18        933,350
  3,000     Washington State Public Power Supply System, Proj #2
             Refg Ser 1994 A (FGIC Insured) .........................................0.00       7/ 1/09      1,140,720
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
 12,165                                                                                                     10,058,485
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            HOSPITAL REVENUE (11.2%)
  1,000     Maine Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Maine Medical
              Center Ser 1986 (Prerefunded) .........................................7.375     10/ 1/13      1,077,360
  2,000     Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, University
              of Maryland Medical Ser 1991 A (FGIC Insured) (Prerefunded)  ..........6.50       7/ 1/21      2,141,380
  2,000     Saint Cloud, Minnesota, The Saint Cloud Hospital Ser 1990 B
             (AMBAC Insured) (Prerefunded) ..........................................7.00       7/ 1/20      2,224,540
  2,000     Clermont County, Ohio, Mercy Health Ser 1991 Special MLDs
             (AMBAC Insured) ........................................................6.733     10/ 5/21      2,087,580
  2,500     North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation,
             University Medical Center Ser 1989 .....................................8.20       4/ 1/19      2,691,075
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
  9,500                                                                                                     10,221,935
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT/POLLUTION CONTROL REVENUE (10.8%)
    750     California Alternative Energy Source Financing Authority,
             SRI International Cogeneration Ser 1985 (a) ............................9.75      12/ 1/05        375,000
            Connecticut Development Authority, Bridgeport Hydraulic Co
    700      Refg Ser 1990 ..........................................................7.25       6/ 1/20        745,850
  2,000      Refg 1994 Ser A (MBIA Insured) (b) .....................................6.05       3/ 1/29      1,918,800
  1,500     Michigan Strategic Fund, Ford Motor Co Refg Ser 1991 A ..................7.10       2/ 1/06      1,624,500
  1,000     Claiborne County, Mississippi, Middle South Energy Inc Ser C  ...........9.875     12/ 1/14      1,151,190


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS June 30, 1994 (unaudited) (continued)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 PRINCIPAL
 AMOUNT (IN                                                                            COUPON    MATURITY
 THOUSANDS)                                                                             RATE      DATE          VALUE
- -----------                                                                            ------    --------       -----
<S>         <C>                                                                      <C>       <C>         <C>
$ 2,000     Ohio Water Development Authority, Dayton Power & Light Co
             Collateralized Refg 1992 Ser A ......................................... 6.40 %    8/15/27    $ 1,964,700
  1,500     Matagorda County Navigational District #1, Texas, Central Power &
              Light Co Collateralized Ser 1984 A .................................... 7.50     12/15/14      1,608,630
    500     Russell County Industrial Development Authority, Virginia,
             Appalachian Power Co Ser G ............................................. 7.70     11/ 1/07        537,085
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
  9,950                                                                                                      9,925,755
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            MORTGAGE REVENUE--MULTI-FAMILY (1.6%)
  1,000     Michigan Housing Development Authority, Rental 1992 Ser A  .............. 6.60      4/ 1/12        999,850
    400     Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Moderate Rehabilitation--
             Section 8 Assisted Issue B ............................................. 9.00      8/ 1/01        421,984
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
  1,400                                                                                                      1,421,834
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            MORTGAGE REVENUE--SINGLE FAMILY (1.5%)
  1,365     Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona,
             Refg 1991 Ser A ........................................................ 7.50      8/ 1/12      1,388,191
     10     Huntington Beach, California, Financing Program 1984 A ..................11.00      7/ 1/17         10,220
      5     Riverside County, California, Issue of 1984 .............................10.50      9/ 1/14          4,961
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
  1,380                                                                                                      1,403,372
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            PUBLIC FACILITIES REVENUE (4.3%)
  2,000     California Public Works Board, Corrections 1993 Ser D ................... 5.375     6/ 1/12      1,742,720
  1,000     Hennepin County, Minnesota, Ser 1991 COPs ............................... 6.80      5/15/17      1,056,150
  1,000     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Ser 1988 A  . 7.90      7/ 1/07      1,100,890
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
  4,000                                                                                                      3,899,760
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES REVENUE (16.6%)
  2,000     Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California,
             Sales Tax Refg Ser 1993 A (MBIA Insured) ............................... 5.625     7/ 1/18      1,808,900
  2,000     Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, California, Sales
             Tax Ser 1991 B ......................................................... 6.50      7/ 1/13      2,010,780
  3,500     Kentucky Turnpike Authority, Resource Recovery Road
             1987 Ser A BIGS ........................................................ 0.00      7/ 1/06      3,535,000
  1,500     Albuquerque, New Mexico, Gross Receipts Tax--Airport Supported
              Sub Lien Ser 12/84 .................................................... 8.25      7/ 1/14      1,596,960
  2,000     Ohio Turnpike Commission, 1994 Ser A .................................... 5.75      2/15/24      1,813,420
  2,000     Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Ser A of 1986 ......................... 6.00     12/ 1/17      1,871,300
  3,000     Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Refg Ser X  ............. 5.25      7/ 1/21      2,512,320
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
 16,000                                                                                                     15,148,680
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            WATER & SEWER REVENUE (17.7%)
  3,000     Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Jr Lien Water
             Ser 1994 ............................................................... 5.45      7/ 1/19      2,643,450
  2,000     Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration, 1990 Ser A  ............ 7.25      9/ 1/11      2,180,840
  2,000     Boston Water & Sewer Commission, Massachusetts, 1992 Ser A  ............. 6.00     11/ 1/15      1,948,200
  1,500     Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 1993 Ser C ..................... 5.25     12/ 1/08      1,364,040
    500     Minnesota Public Facilities Authority, Water Pollution Ser 1991 A  ...... 6.95      3/ 1/13        538,775
  2,000     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, New York, Suffolk
             County Southwest Sewer Ser 1994 (FGIC Insured) ......................... 4.75      2/ 1/09      1,737,120
  1,000     Columbus, Ohio, Sewerage Refg Ser 1992 .................................. 6.25      6/ 1/08      1,017,660
            Spartanburg, South Carolina, Water Impr
  1,250      Refg Ser A 1992 ........................................................ 6.25      6/ 1/12      1,244,588
  1,700      Refg Ser A 1992 ........................................................ 6.25      6/ 1/17      1,667,445
  2,000     Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County,
             Tennessee, Refg of 1986 ................................................ 5.50      1/ 1/16      1,804,240
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
 16,950                                                                                                     16,146,358
- -----------                                                                                                -------------


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>
<CAPTION>
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS June 30, 1994 (unaudited) (continued)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 PRINCIPAL
 AMOUNT (IN                                                                            COUPON    MATURITY
 THOUSANDS)                                                                             RATE      DATE          VALUE
- -----------                                                                            ------    --------       -----
<S>         <C>                                                                      <C>       <C>         <C>
            OTHER REVENUE (1.7%)
$ 1,500     New York Local Government Assistance Corporation, Ser 1991 D  ...........7.00 %    4/ 1/11     $ 1,562,115
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
 92,345     TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $85,435,880) ........................................... 87,529,239
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
            SHORT-TERM MUNICIPAL OBLIGATION (4.0%)
  3,700     Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Franciscan Sisters Health Care
             Corp Ser 1992 (Tender 7/1/94) (Identified Cost $3,700,000)  ............3.40*     5/ 1/11       3,700,000
- -----------                                                                                                -------------
$96,045     TOTAL INVESTMENTS (Identified Cost $89,135,880) (c) ............................... 99.8%       91,229,239
===========
            CASH AND OTHER ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LIABILITIES ....................................  0.2           183,937
                                                                                               ----------- -------------
            NET ASSETS ........................................................................100.0%      $91,413,176
                                                                                               =========== =============
<FN>
- ---------------
   BIGS Bond Income Growth Security

   COPs Certificates of Participation

   MLDs Municipal Long-Term Debt

  * Variable or floating rate securities. Coupon rate shown reflects current
    rate.

   (a) Partial interest paid. Interest income is recorded as received.

   (b) Security purchased on a when issued basis.

   (c) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $89,135,880; the
      aggregate gross unrealized appreciation is $5,282,876 and the aggregate
      gross unrealized depreciation is $3,189,517, resulting in net
      unrealized appreciation of $2,093,359.
</TABLE>

                        See Notes to Financial Statements

                      GEOGRAPHIC SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS
               Based on Market Value as a Percent of Net Assets
                          June 30, 1994 (unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                   <C>
Arizona .............. 6.7%
California ..........  7.6
Connecticut .........  2.9
District of Columbia   2.7
Illinois ............  4.0
Kentucky ............  3.9
Maine ...............  1.2
Maryland ............  7.2%
Massachusetts .......  5.5
Michigan ............  2.9
Minnesota ...........  4.2
Mississippi .........  1.3
Nebraska ............  2.6
New Jersey ..........  1.7
New York ............  8.0%
New Mexico ..........  1.7
North Carolina ......  1.9
Ohio ................  8.5
Pennsylvania ........  2.5
Puerto Rico .........  4.0
South Carolina ......  3.2
Tennessee ...........  2.0%
Texas ...............  5.7
Utah ................  2.0
Virginia ............  1.7
Washington ..........  4.2
                      ------
Total                 99.8%
                      ======
</TABLE>


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
June 30, 1994 (unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                         <C>
 ASSETS:
Investments in securities, at value
 (identified cost $89,135,880) (Note 1)  .. $91,229,239
Cash ......................................     120,040
Receivable for:
 Interest .................................   1,707,178
 Investments sold .........................     580,207
Prepaid expenses and other assets  ........      26,270
                                            -------------
  TOTAL ASSETS ............................  93,662,934
                                            -------------
LIABILITIES:
Payable for:
 Investments purchased ....................   1,978,480
 Shares of beneficial interest repurchased      163,395
 Investment management fee (Note 2)  ......      38,347
Accrued expenses (Note 3) .................      69,536
                                            -------------
  TOTAL LIABILITIES .......................   2,249,758
                                            -------------
NET ASSETS:
Paid-in-capital ...........................  88,367,912
Accumulated undistributed net realized
 gain on investments ......................     671,783
Net unrealized appreciation on investments    2,093,359
Accumulated undistributed net investment
 income ...................................     280,122
                                            -------------
  NET ASSETS .............................. $91,413,176
                                            =============
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE, 7,736,078
 shares outstanding (unlimited authorized
 shares of $.01 par value) ................      $11.82
                                            =============
</TABLE>

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the six months ended June 30, 1994 (unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
 INVESTMENT INCOME:
 INTEREST INCOME ...................... $  2,952,023
                                        -------------
 EXPENSES
  Investment management fee (Note 2)  .     236,427
  Transfer agent fees and expenses  ...     137,800
  Professional fees ...................      23,713
  Shareholder reports and notices  ....      22,457
  Registration fees ...................      21,105
  Trustees' fees and expenses .........       9,387
  Other ...............................      16,958
                                        -------------
   TOTAL EXPENSES .....................     467,847
                                        -------------
    NET INVESTMENT INCOME .............   2,484,176
                                        -------------
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN
 (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS (Note 1):
 Net realized gain on investments  ....     397,955
 Net change in unrealized appreciation
  on investments ......................  (8,284,986)
                                        -------------
   NET LOSS ON INVESTMENTS ............  (7,887,031)
                                        -------------
    NET DECREASE IN NET ASSETS
     RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS ........ $(5,402,855)
                                        =============
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              FOR THE SIX
                                                                              MONTHS ENDED      FOR THE YEAR
                                                                             JUNE 30, 1994     ENDED DECEMBER
                                                                              (UNAUDITED)         31, 1993
                                                                           ----------------  -----------------
<S>                                                                        <C>               <C>
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS:
 Operations:
  Net investment income .................................................. $ 2,484,176         $ 4,639,611
  Net realized gain on investments .......................................     397,955             687,390
  Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments ...................  (8,284,986)          4,565,906
                                                                           ------------        ------------
   Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations  ......  (5,402,855)          9,892,907
                                                                           ------------        ------------
 Dividends and distributions to shareholders from:
  Net investment income ..................................................  (2,540,837)         (4,564,504)
  Net realized gain on investments .......................................     -0-                (387,730)
                                                                           ------------        ------------
   Total dividends and distributions .....................................  (2,540,837)         (4,952,234)
                                                                           ------------        ------------
 Net increase from transactions in shares of beneficial interest (Note 4).   3,091,965          15,406,570
                                                                           ------------        ------------
   Total increase (decrease) .............................................  (4,851,727)         20,347,243
NET ASSETS:
 Beginning of period .....................................................  96,264,903          75,917,660
                                                                           ------------        ------------
 END OF PERIOD (including undistributed net investment income of $280,122
  and $336,783, respectively) ............................................ $91,413,176         $96,264,903
                                                                           ============        ============
</TABLE>

                      See Notes to Financial Statements


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.  ORGANIZATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES--Dean Witter Select Municipal
Reinvestment Fund (the "Fund") is registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment
company. The Fund was organized as a Massachusetts business trust on June 1,
1983 and commenced operations on September 22, 1983.

     The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:

     A. VALUATION OF INVESTMENTS--Portfolio securities are valued for the
     Fund by an outside independent pricing service approved by the Trustees.
     The pricing service has informed the Fund that in valuing the Fund's
     portfolio securities, it uses both a computerized grid matrix of
     tax-exempt securities and evaluations by its staff, in each case based
     on information concerning market transactions and quotations from
     dealers which reflect the bid side of the market each day. The Fund's
     portfolio securities are thus valued by reference to a combination of
     transactions and quotations for the same or other securities believed to
     be comparable in quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, call
     provisions, trading characteristics and other features deemed to be
     relevant.

     B. ACCOUNTING FOR INVESTMENTS--Security transactions are accounted for
     on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed). Realized
     gains and losses on security transactions are determined on the
     identified cost method. In computing net investment income, the Fund
     amortizes premiums and original issue discounts. With respect to market
     discount on bonds purchased after April 30, 1993, a portion of any
     capital gain realized upon disposition may be recharacterized as taxable
     investment income. Interest income is accrued daily except where
     collection is not expected.

     C. FEDERAL INCOME TAX STATUS--It is the Fund's policy to comply with the
     requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated
     investment companies and to distribute all of its taxable and nontaxable
     income to its shareholders. Accordingly, no federal income tax provision
     is required.

     D. DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS--The Fund records
     dividends and distributions to its shareholders on the record date. The
     amount of dividends and distributions from net investment income and net
     realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income
     tax regulations which may differ from generally accepted accounting
     principles. These "book/tax" differences are either considered temporary
     or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in
     nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based
     on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not
     require reclassifications. Dividends and distributions which exceed net
     investment income and net realized capital gains for financial reporting
     purposes but not for tax purposes are reported as dividends in excess of
     net investment income or distributions in excess of net realized capital
     gains. To the extent they exceed net investment income and net realized
     capital gains for tax purposes, they are reported as distributions of
     paid-in-capital.

2. TRANSACTIONS WITH INVESTMENT MANAGER--Pursuant to an Investment Management
Agreement with Dean Witter InterCapital Inc. (the "Investment Manager"), the
Fund pays its Investment Manager a monthly management fee, calculated and
accrued daily, by applying the annual rate of 0.50% to the daily net assets
of the Fund.


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) (continued)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Under the terms of the Agreement, in addition to managing the Fund's
investments, the Investment Manager maintains certain of the Fund's books and
records and furnishes, at its own expense, office space, facilities,
equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and certain legal services and pays the
salaries of all personnel, including officers of the Fund who are employees
of the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager also bears the cost of
telephone services, heat, light, power and other utilities provided to the
Fund.

3. SECURITY TRANSACTIONS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES--The cost of
purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities, excluding
short-term investments, for the six months ended June 30, 1994 aggregated
$13,956,114 and $12,167,573, respectively.

   Dean Witter Trust Company, an affiliate of the Investment Manager, is the
Fund's transfer agent. At June 30, 1994, the Fund had transfer agent fees and
expenses payable of approximately $30,000.

4. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST --Transactions in shares of beneficial
interest were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE   FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
                                    30, 1994 (UNAUDITED)                 31, 1993
                               -----------------------------  -----------------------------
                                   SHARES          AMOUNT         SHARES          AMOUNT
                               -------------  --------------  -------------  --------------
<S>                            <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
Sold .........................  1,837,389     $ 22,889,546     4,540,460     $ 57,002,124
Reinvestment of dividends and
 distributions ...............    201,102        2,463,383       382,816        4,821,330
                               -------------  --------------  -------------  --------------
                                2,038,491       25,352,929     4,923,276       61,823,454
Repurchased .................. (1,810,885)     (22,260,964)   (3,677,938)     (46,416,884)
                               -------------  --------------  -------------  --------------
Net increase .................    227,606     $  3,091,965     1,245,338     $ 15,406,570
                               =============  ==============  =============  ==============
</TABLE>


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) (continued)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Selected ratios and per share data for a share of beneficial interest
outstanding throughout each period:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       FOR THE SIX                FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                      MONTHS ENDED   ------------------------------------------------------
                                      JUNE 30, 1994
                                       (UNAUDITED)      1993      1992       1991       1990       1989
                                      -------------- ---------- ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
PER SHARE OPERATING
PERFORMANCE:
<S>                                 <C>              <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
 Net asset value, beginning  of
 period ........................... $    12.82       $  12.12 $    11.89 $    11.25 $    11.41 $    11.08
                                    ---------------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
 Net investment income ............       0.33           0.67       0.70       0.71       0.70       0.68
 Net realized and unrealized  gain
  (loss) on investments ...........      (1.00)          0.75       0.32       0.62      (0.15)       0.33
                                    ---------------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
 Total from investment operations        (0.67)          1.42       1.02       1.33       0.55       1.01
                                    ---------------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
 Less dividends and distributions:
  Dividends from net investment
   income ..........................     (0.33)         (0.67)     (0.70)    (0.69)      (0.71)     (0.68)
  Distributions from net realized
   gain on investments ............        -0-          (0.05)     (0.09)      -0-        -0-         -0-
                                    ---------------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
 Total dividends and
  distributions ...................      (0.33)         (0.72)     (0.79)     (0.69)     (0.71)     (0.68)
                                    ---------------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
 Net asset value, end of period  .. $    11.82       $  12.82   $  12.12 $    11.89 $    11.25 $    11.41
                                    ===============  =========  =========  =========  =========  =========
TOTAL INVESTMENT RETURN ...........      (5.26%)(1)     11.99%      8.88%     12.04%      5.27%      9.47%
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
 Net assets, end of period  (in
  thousands) ......................    $91,413        $96,265    $75,918    $67,903    $60,304    $52,485
 Ratio of expenses to average  net
  assets ..........................       0.99%(2)       1.02%      1.14%      1.20%      1.21%      1.40%
 Ratio of net investment income
  to average net assets ...........       5.25%(2)       5.25%      5.79%      6.06%      6.12%      5.90%
 Portfolio turnover rate ..........         13%             9%        13%        30%        22%        15%
</TABLE>
- ---------------
   (1) Not annualized.
   (2) Annualized.

                      See Notes to Financial Statements


<PAGE>

         
<PAGE>

TRUSTEES
- ------------------------------
Jack F. Bennett
Michael Bozic
Charles A. Fiumefreddo
Edwin J. Garn
John R. Haire
Dr. John E. Jeuck
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson
Paul Kolton
Michael E. Nugent
Philip J. Purcell
John L. Schroeder
Edward R. Telling

OFFICERS
- ------------------------------
Charles A. Fiumefreddo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Sheldon Curtis
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

James F. Willison
Vice President

Thomas F. Caloia
Treasurer

TRANSFER AGENT
- ------------------------------
Dean Witter Trust Company
Harborside Financial Center--Plaza Two
Jersey City, New Jersey 07311

LEGAL COUNSEL
- ------------------------------
Sheldon Curtis
Two World Trade Center
New York, New York 10048

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
- ------------------------------
Price Waterhouse
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036

INVESTMENT MANAGER
- ------------------------------
Dean Witter InterCapital Inc.
Two World Trade Center
New York, New York 10048

The financial statements included herein have been taken from the records of
the Fund without examination by the independent accountants and accordingly
they do not express an opinion thereon.

This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the
Fund. For more detailed information about the Fund, its officers and
trustees, fees, expenses and other pertinent information, please see the
prospectus of the Fund.

This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in
the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.

DEAN WITTER
SELECT MUNICIPAL
REINVESTMENT
FUND
SEMIANNUAL REPORT
JUNE 30, 1994



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission