DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
N-30D, 1995-08-29
Previous: NOBEL EDUCATION DYNAMICS INC, SC 13D/A, 1995-08-29
Next: SMITH BARNEY SHEARSON TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRUST, N-30B-2, 1995-08-29



<PAGE>   1
 
                 DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
                             Two World Trade Center
                            New York, New York 10048
DEAR SHAREHOLDER:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
     Fixed-income market conditions have steadily improved since late last year.
Bonds began to rally on signs of slower economic growth in the wake of
progressive tightening of monetary policy by the Federal Reserve Board. The
trend toward lower long-term interest rates reversed the prevailing pattern
during 1994, when rapidly rising rates created a severe bear market in bonds.
 
     Long-term municipal bond yields, as tracked by The Bond Buyer Revenue Bond
Index*, moved from 6.97 percent in December to 6.28 percent at the end of June.
This 69 basis point decline in yield corresponded to a 6 percent price increase
for municipal bonds with 30-year maturities. One-year yields declined 116 basis
points over the past six months and the yield spread (difference between long-
and short-term municipal bond interest rates) widened.
 
     The seasonal demand for municipals in December and January more than offset
the uncertainty caused by the Orange County, California bankruptcy filing.
Tax-exempt bonds outperformed U.S. Treasury bonds through February. The ratio of
the Revenue Bond Index yield to the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yield moved from
a high of 89 percent in December to 84 percent by the end of February. A
declining ratio means that municipal bond prices have been stronger than U.S.
Treasury prices. Congressional tax reform proposals that advocated the flat tax
concept were partially responsible for municipals underperforming Treasuries
from March through June. By the end of June, the Revenue Bond Index/Treasury
bond yield ratio had risen to 95 percent.
 
     The pace of new-issue underwriting over the first six months of 1995 was 25
percent below the same period last year. With bond maturities and calls for
redemption estimated to exceed new issues coming to market this year, the
outstanding supply of municipal securities is expected to decline. This scarcity
of municipal issues should strengthen market conditions.
 
PERFORMANCE
 
     Dean Witter Select Municipal Reinvestment Fund's total return for the first
half of 1995 was 8.40 percent. The Fund's net asset value on June 30, 1995 was
$11.97 per share. Tax-free dividends totaling $0.31 per share, and long-term
capital gains of $0.01 per share were distributed during this period. At the end
of June, the Fund had net assets in excess of $89 million. Since its inception
on September 22, 1983, the Fund has provided shareholders with an average annual
total return of 8.91 percent.
 
PORTFOLIO STRUCTURE
 
     At the end of June, the Fund was predominantly invested in long-term
tax-exempt bonds. Refunded bonds with escrows set to be called within 10 years
comprised 8 percent of net assets. Long-term investments were diversified among
12 specific municipal sectors and 52 separate credits. The three
 
- ---------------
  *The Bond Buyer Revenue Bond Index is an arithmetic average of the yields of
   25 selected municipal revenue bonds with 30-year maturities. Credit ratings
   of these bonds range from Aa1 to Baa1 by Moody's and AA+ to A- by Standard &
   Poor's.
<PAGE>   2
 
largest municipal sectors -- water & sewer revenue, transportation revenue and
general obligation bonds -- represented 47 percent of net assets. Maryland,
Ohio, New York, Massachusetts and Arizona contain the largest amount of
long-term, unrefunded holdings among the 22 states represented in the portfolio.
The average maturity and call protection of the Fund's long-term holdings was 18
and 7 years, respectively. The credit quality ratings of the long-term portfolio
are summarized below:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            Moody's or Standard & Poor's Ratings                         Percent
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------     ----
        <S>                                                                              <C>
        Aaa or AAA..................................................................       24%
        Aa or AA....................................................................       30
        A or A......................................................................       38
        Baa or BBB..................................................................        3
        Not rated...................................................................        5
                                                                                         ----
                                                                                          100%
                                                                                          ===
</TABLE>
 
LOOKING AHEAD
 
     Slower economic growth in 1995 and the extent of the Federal Reserve
Board's previous interest rate moves have improved bond market expectations. The
decreasing supply of municipal bonds as a result of significant bond maturities,
calls for redemption and diminished new-issue supply should be positive for the
market. Tax reduction proposals will continue to receive publicity and cloud the
outlook for municipal bonds. However, to achieve significant reductions in tax
rates, elected officials and the public must address difficult issues such as
the mortgage interest deduction and middle-class tax burden. With long-term
tax-exempt bonds yielding more than 90 percent of the yield on Treasuries, the
market appears to have discounted much of the possibility that a flat tax might
eventually become law.
 
Among the factors that will determine the Fund's future dividend level are
changes in market yields and the sale of portfolio holdings which are expected
to be redeemed. Even with the move to higher yields that occurred last year, the
Fund cannot replace the yield attributable to many older investments which may
be called or sold in the next few years.
 
     We appreciate your ongoing support of Dean Witter Select Municipal
Reinvestment Fund and look forward to continuing to serve your investment needs.
 
                                          Very truly yours,
 
                                          /s/ CHARLES A. FIUMEFREDDO 
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Charles A. Fiumefreddo
                                          Chairman of the Board
<PAGE>   3
 
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS June 30, 1995 (unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 Principal
  Amount
   (in                                                                  Coupon     Maturity
 thousands)                                                              Rate        Date           Value
 --------                                                               ------     ---------     ------------
 <C>         <S>                                                        <C>        <C>           <C>
             MUNICIPAL BONDS (98.4%)
             GENERAL OBLIGATION (14.6%)
 $  2,000    Washington Suburban Sanitation District, Maryland,
               General Construction Refg 1994.......................     5.00 %     06/01/14     $  1,798,420
    2,000    Massachusetts, 1994 Ser C (FGIC).......................     6.75       11/01/12        2,154,540
    3,000    New York City, New York, 1990 Ser D....................     6.00       08/01/07        2,921,910
    2,295    Pennsylvania, First Ser 1995 (FGIC)....................     5.50       05/01/12        2,207,124
    2,000    Shelby County, Tennessee, Refg 1995 Ser A..............     5.625      04/01/12        1,962,600
    2,000    Washington, Ser 1995 A.................................     5.80       09/01/08        2,028,200
 --------                                                                                        ------------
   13,295                                                                                          13,072,794
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES REVENUE (11.5%)
    2,000    Price-Elliot Research Park Inc, Arizona, Arizona State
               University Refg Ser 1991 (MBIA)......................     7.00       07/01/21        2,181,600
    3,000    Georgetown University, District of Columbia, Ser
               1993.................................................     5.375      04/01/23        2,526,360
    2,000    Massachusetts Health & Education Facilities Authority,
               Boston College Ser K.................................     5.25       06/01/18        1,793,760
    1,500    Rutgers - The State University, New Jersey, Refg Ser
               R....................................................     6.50       05/01/13        1,580,115
    2,000    New York State Dormitory Authority, State University
               Ser 1989 B...........................................     0.00       05/15/03        1,254,600
    1,000    Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, Oberlin
               College Ser 1993.....................................     5.375      10/01/15          930,500
 --------                                                                                        ------------
   11,500                                                                                          10,266,935
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             ELECTRIC REVENUE (9.4%)
    1,000    Northern California Power Agency, Geothermal #3-1987
               Refg Ser A (Partial Crossover Refunded)..............     7.00       07/01/07        1,027,680
    2,000    Nebraska Public Power District, Power Supply 1993
               Ser..................................................     6.125      01/01/15        2,010,700
      800    Fayetteville Public Works, North Carolina, Ser 1995 A
               (AMBAC)..............................................     5.375      03/01/20          735,008
      500    North Carolina Municipal Power Agency #1, Catawba Ser
               1985 A...............................................     7.00       01/01/20          503,830
    1,000    Austin, Texas, Utilities Refg Ser 1993 A...............     5.625      05/15/16          930,870
    2,000    Intermountain Power Agency, Utah, Refg 1985 Ser H......     6.00       07/01/21        1,905,320
    3,000    Washington Public Power Supply System, Proj #2 Refg Ser
               1994 A (FGIC)........................................     0.00       07/01/09        1,275,840
 --------                                                                                        ------------
   10,300                                                                                           8,389,248
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             HOSPITAL REVENUE (5.3%)
    2,000    Clermont County, Ohio, Mercy Health Ser 1991 (AMBAC)...     6.73       10/05/21        2,137,560
    2,500    North Central Texas Health Facilities Development
               Corporation, University Medical Center Inc Ser
               1989.................................................     8.20       04/01/19        2,647,225
 --------                                                                                        ------------
    4,500                                                                                           4,784,785
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT/POLLUTION CONTROL REVENUE (9.1%)
      750    California Alternative Energy Source Financing
               Authority, SRI International Cogeneration Ser 1985
               (a)..................................................     9.75       12/01/05          352,500
      700    Connecticut Development Authority, Bridgeport Hydraulic
               Co Refg Ser 1990.....................................     7.25       06/01/20          737,989
    1,500    Michigan Strategic Fund, Ford Motor Co Refg Ser 1991
               A....................................................     7.10       02/01/06        1,627,830
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   4
 
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS June 30, 1995 (unaudited) (continued)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 Principal
  Amount
   (in                                                                  Coupon     Maturity
 thousands)                                                              Rate        Date           Value
 --------                                                               ------     ---------     ------------
 <C>         <S>                                                        <C>        <C>           <C>
 $  1,000    Claiborne County, Mississippi, Middle South Energy Inc
               Ser C................................................     9.875%     12/01/14     $  1,162,350
    2,000    Ohio Water Development Authority, Dayton Power & Light
               Co Collateralized Refg 1992 Ser A....................     6.40       08/15/27        2,044,140
    1,500    Matagorda County Navigation District #1, Texas, Central
               Power & Light Co Collateralized Ser 1984 A...........     7.50       12/15/14        1,649,370
      500    Russell County Industrial Development Authority,
               Virginia, Appalachian Power Co Ser G.................     7.70       11/01/07          545,090
 --------                                                                                        ------------
    7,950                                                                                           8,119,269
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             MORTGAGE REVENUE - MULTI-FAMILY (1.6%)
    1,000    Michigan Housing Development Authority, Rental 1992 Ser
               A....................................................     6.60       04/01/12        1,024,880
      400    Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Moderate
               Rehabilitation - Section 8 Assisted Issue B..........     9.00       08/01/01          409,388
 --------                                                                                        ------------
    1,400                                                                                           1,434,268
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             MORTGAGE REVENUE - SINGLE FAMILY (1.2%)
    1,035    Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority,
 --------      Arizona,
               Refg 1991 Ser A......................................     7.50       08/01/12        1,101,902
                                                                                                 ------------
             PUBLIC FACILITIES REVENUE (4.4%)
    2,000    California Public Works Board, Corrections 1993 Ser
               D....................................................     5.375      06/01/12        1,789,880
    1,000    Hennepin County, Minnesota, Ser 1991 COPs..............     6.80       05/15/17        1,064,620
    1,000    Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special
               Tax Ser 1988 A.......................................     7.90       07/01/07        1,106,990
 --------                                                                                        ------------
    4,000                                                                                           3,961,490
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES REVENUE (14.8%)
    2,000    Los Angeles County Transportation Commission,
               California, Sales Tax Ser 1991 B.....................     6.50       07/01/13        2,018,580
    2,000    Lee County, Florida, Ser 1995 (MBIA)...................     5.75       10/01/22        1,920,140
    3,500    Kentucky Turnpike Authority, Resource Recovery Road
               1987 Ser A BIGS......................................     0.00*      07/01/06        3,711,225
    2,000    Ohio Turnpike Commission, 1994 Ser A...................     5.75       02/15/24        1,910,820
    2,000    Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Ser A of 1986........     6.00       12/01/17        1,985,260
    2,000    Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Refg
               Ser X................................................     5.25       07/01/21        1,763,160
 --------                                                                                        ------------
   13,500                                                                                          13,309,185
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             WATER & SEWER REVENUE (17.2%)
    3,000    Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Jr Lien
               Water Ser 1994.......................................     5.45       07/01/19        2,809,590
    2,000    Maryland Water Quality Financing Administration, 1990
               Ser A................................................     7.25       09/01/11        2,211,440
    2,000    Boston Water & Sewer Commission, Massachusetts, 1992
               Ser A................................................     6.00       11/01/15        1,999,800
    1,500    Massachusetts Water Resource Authority, 1993 Ser C.....     5.25       12/01/08        1,430,445
    2,000    Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, New York,
               Southwest Sewer Ser 1994 (FGIC)......................     4.75       02/01/09        1,802,580
    1,000    Columbus, Ohio, Sewerage Refg Ser 1992.................     6.25       06/01/08        1,037,980
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   5
 
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS June 30, 1995 (unaudited) (continued)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 Principal
  Amount
   (in                                                                  Coupon     Maturity
 thousands)                                                              Rate        Date           Value
 --------                                                               ------     ---------     ------------
 <C>         <S>                                                        <C>        <C>           <C>
             Spartanburg, South Carolina, Water Impr
 $  1,250    Refg Ser A 1992........................................     6.25 %     06/01/12     $  1,272,988
    1,000    Refg Ser A 1992........................................     6.25       06/01/17        1,010,130
    2,000    Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County,
               Tennessee, Refg of 1986..............................     5.50       01/01/16        1,865,060
 --------                                                                                        ------------
   15,750                                                                                          15,440,013
 --------                                                                                        ------------
             OTHER REVENUE (1.8%)
    1,500    New York Local Government Assistance Corporation,
 --------      Ser 1991 D...........................................     7.00       04/01/11        1,636,365
                                                                                                 ------------
             REFUNDED (7.5%)
    2,000    Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities
               Authority, University of Maryland Medical System Ser
               1991 A (FGIC)........................................     6.50       07/01/21        2,185,280
    2,000    Morgan State University, Maryland, Academic & Auxiliary
               Fees 1990 Ser A (MBIA)...............................     7.00       07/01/20        2,240,360
    2,000    Saint Cloud, Minnesota, The Saint Cloud Hospital Ser
               1990 B (AMBAC).......................................     7.00       07/01/20        2,267,300
 --------                                                                                        ------------
    6,000                                                                                           6,692,940
 --------                                                                                        ------------
 $ 90,730    TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $84,258,264) (B)..........         98.4%       88,209,194
  =======
             CASH AND OTHER ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LIABILITIES...................           1.6        1,442,802
                                                                                       -----     ------------
             NET ASSETS.......................................................        100.0%     $ 89,651,996
                                                                                       =====     ============
</TABLE>
 
- ---------------
 BIGS  Bond Income Growth Security.
 COPs  Certificates of Participation.
  *    Currently zero coupon bond; will convert to 8.50% coupon on July 1, 1997.
 (a)   Partial interest paid. Interest income in arrears is recorded as 
       received.
 (b)   The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $84,258,264; the 
       aggregate gross unrealized appreciation is $5,940,701 and the aggregate 
       gross unrealized depreciation is $1,989,771, resulting in net unrealized
       appreciation of $3,950,930.
Bond Insurance:
- ---------------
AMBAC  AMBAC Indemnity Corporation.
 FGIC  Financial Guaranty Insurance Company.
 MBIA  Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Company.
 
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                       GEOGRAPHIC SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS
                Based on Market Value as a Percent of Net Assets
                           June 30, 1995 (unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
<TABLE>
<S>                   <C>
Arizona.............   6.8%
California..........   5.8
Connecticut.........   0.8
District of
  Columbia..........   2.8
Florida.............   2.2
Kentucky............   4.1
Maryland............   9.4%
Massachusetts.......   8.2
Michigan............   3.0
Minnesota...........   3.7
Mississippi.........   1.3
Nebraska............   2.2
New Jersey..........   1.8%
New York............   8.5
North Carolina......   1.4
Ohio................   9.0
Pennsylvania........   5.1
Puerto Rico.........   3.2
South Carolina......   2.6%
Tennessee...........   4.3
Texas...............   5.8
Utah................   2.1
Virginia............   0.6
Washington..........   3.7
                      ----
Total...............  98.4%
                      ====
</TABLE>
 
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                       See Notes to Financial Statements
<PAGE>   6
 
SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
June 30, 1995 (unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------
ASSETS:
Investments in securities, at value
  (identified cost $84,258,264).............  $ 88,209,194
Cash........................................        94,737
Interest receivable.........................     1,504,420
Prepaid expenses and other assets...........        28,119
                                              ------------
        TOTAL ASSETS........................    89,836,470
                                              ------------
LIABILITIES:
Payable for:
  Shares of beneficial interest
    repurchased.............................        73,626
  Investment management fee.................        37,541
  Dividends and distributions to
    shareholders............................        25,958
Accrued expenses and other payables.........        47,349
                                              ------------
        TOTAL LIABILITIES...................       184,474
                                              ------------
NET ASSETS:
Paid-in-capital.............................    85,458,350
Net unrealized appreciation.................     3,950,930
Accumulated undistributed net realized
  gain......................................       242,716
                                              ------------
        NET ASSETS..........................  $ 89,651,996
                                               ===========
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE,
  7,486,643 shares outstanding (unlimited
  shares authorized of $.01 par value)......        $11.97
                                                    ======
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS For the six months
ended June 30, 1995 (unaudited)
- ---------------------------------------------
NET INVESTMENT INCOME:
 INTEREST INCOME.............................  $ 2,815,628
                                               -----------
 EXPENSES
  Investment management fee..................      224,266
  Transfer agent fees and expenses...........      140,006
  Professional fees..........................       22,003
  Shareholder reports and notices............       21,553
  Registration fees..........................       17,987
  Trustees' fees and expenses................       10,747
  Other......................................        6,674
                                               -----------
    TOTAL EXPENSES...........................      443,236
                                               -----------
    NET INVESTMENT INCOME....................    2,372,392
                                               -----------
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN:
  Net realized gain..........................      242,713
  Net change in unrealized depreciation......    4,647,511
                                               -----------
    NET GAIN.................................    4,890,224
                                               -----------
    NET INCREASE.............................  $ 7,262,616
                                                ==========
</TABLE>
 
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                For the six
                                                                                months ended      For the year
                                                                                  June 30,            ended
                                                                                    1995          December 31,
                                                                                (unaudited)           1994
                                                                                ------------      -------------
<S>                                                                             <C>               <C>
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS:
  Operations:
    Net Investment income.................................................      $  2,372,392      $   4,929,867
    Net realized gain.....................................................           242,713             53,865
    Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation....................         4,647,511        (11,074,926)
                                                                                ------------      -------------
      Net increase (decrease).............................................         7,262,616         (6,091,194)
                                                                                ------------      -------------
  Dividends and distributions to shareholders from:
    Net investment income.................................................        (2,395,590)        (5,253,876)
    Net realized gain.....................................................           (53,708)          (273,982)
                                                                                ------------      -------------
      Total...............................................................        (2,449,298)        (5,527,858)
  Net increase (decrease) from transactions in shares of beneficial
    interest..............................................................        (1,566,720)         1,759,547
                                                                                ------------      -------------
      Total increase (decrease)...........................................         3,246,598         (9,859,505)
NET ASSETS:
  Beginning of period.....................................................        86,405,398         96,264,903
                                                                                ------------      -------------
  END OF PERIOD (including undistributed net investment income
    of $0 and $23,198, respectively)......................................      $ 89,651,996      $  86,405,398
                                                                                 ===========      =============
</TABLE>
 
                       See Notes to Financial Statements
<PAGE>   7
 
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
1.  ORGANIZATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- Dean Witter Select Municipal
Reinvestment Fund (the "Fund") is registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the "Act"), as a diversified, open-end management investment
company. The Fund was organized as a Massachusetts business trust on June 1,
1983 and commenced operations on September 22, 1983.
 
     The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
 
     A. Valuation of Investments -- Portfolio securities are valued for the Fund
     by an outside independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. The
     pricing service has informed the Fund that in valuing the Fund's portfolio
     securities, it uses both a computerized matrix of tax-exempt securities and
     evaluations by its staff, in each case based on information concerning
     market transactions and quotations from dealers which reflect the bid side
     of the market each day. The Fund's portfolio securities are thus valued by
     reference to a combination of transactions and quotations for the same or
     other securities believed to be comparable in quality, coupon, maturity,
     type of issue, call provisions, trading characteristics and other features
     deemed to be relevant. Short-term debt securities having a maturity date of
     more than sixty days at time of purchase are valued on a mark-to-market
     basis until sixty days prior to maturity and thereafter at amortized cost
     based on their value on the 61st day. Short-term debt securities having a
     maturity date of sixty days or less at the time of purchase are valued at
     amortized cost.
 
     B. Accounting for Investments -- Security transactions are accounted for on
     the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed). Realized gains
     and losses on security transactions are determined by the identified cost
     method. The Fund amortizes premiums and accretes discounts on securities
     purchased over the life of the respective securities. Interest income is
     accrued daily except where collection is not expected.
 
     C. Federal Income Tax Status -- It is the Fund's policy to comply with the
     requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated
     investment companies and to distribute all of its taxable and nontaxable
     income to its shareholders. Accordingly, no federal income tax provision is
     required.
 
     D. Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders -- The Fund records
     dividends and distributions to its shareholders on the record date. The
     amount of dividends and distributions from net investment income and net
     realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax
     regulations which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles.
     These "book/tax" differences are either considered temporary or permanent
     in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such
     amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal
     tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification.
     Dividends and distributions which exceed net investment income and net
     realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes but not for tax
     purposes are reported as dividends in excess of net investment income or
     distributions in excess of net realized capital gains. To the extent they
     exceed net investment income and net realized capital gains for tax
     purposes, they are reported as distributions of paid-in-capital.
 
2.  INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT -- Pursuant to an Investment Management
Agreement with Dean Witter InterCapital Inc. (the "Investment Manager"), the
Fund pays its Investment Manager a
<PAGE>   8
 
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) (continued)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
management fee, accrued daily and payable monthly, by applying the annual rate
of 0.50% to the daily net assets of the Fund determined as of the close of each
business day.
 
     Under the terms of the Agreement, in addition to managing the Fund's
investments, the Investment Manager maintains certain of the Fund's books and
records and furnishes, at its own expense, office space, facilities, equipment,
clerical, bookkeeping and certain legal services and pays the salaries of all
personnel, including officers of the Fund who are employees of the Investment
Manager. The Investment Manager also bears the cost of telephone services, heat,
light, power and other utilities provided to the Fund.
 
3.  SECURITY TRANSACTIONS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES -- The cost of
purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities, excluding short-term
investments, for the six months ended June 30, 1995 aggregated $8,854,317 and
$4,900,187, respectively.
 
     Dean Witter Trust Company, an affiliate of the Investment Manager, is the
Fund's transfer agent. At June 30, 1995, the Fund had transfer agent fees and
expenses payable of approximately $23,000.
 
4.  SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST -- Transactions in shares of beneficial
interest were as follows:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For the six months              For the year ended
                                             ended June 30,1995              December 31, 1994
                                        ----------------------------    ----------------------------
                                          Shares          Amount          Shares          Amount
                                        -----------    -------------    -----------    -------------
<S>                                     <C>            <C>              <C>            <C>
Sold.................................     1,383,674    $  16,404,332      3,172,307    $  38,359,487
Reinvestment of dividends and
  distributions......................       192,507        2,296,712        449,718        5,341,690
                                        -----------    -------------    -----------    -------------
                                          1,576,181       18,701,044      3,622,025       43,701,177
Repurchased..........................    (1,708,912)     (20,267,764)    (3,511,123)     (41,941,630)
                                        -----------    -------------    -----------    -------------
Net increase (decrease)..............      (132,731)   $  (1,566,720)       110,902    $   1,759,547
                                         ==========    =============     ==========    =============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   9
 
DEAN WITTER SELECT MUNICIPAL REINVESTMENT FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Selected ratios and per share data for a share of beneficial interest
outstanding throughout each period:
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     For the
                                    six months
                                    ended June                       For the year ended December 31,
                                     30, 1995          ------------------------------------------------------------
                                    (unaudited)          1994         1993         1992         1991         1990
                                    -----------        --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
<S>                                 <C>                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
PER SHARE OPERATING PERFORMANCE:
Net asset value, beginning of
  period..........................  $ 11.34            $  12.82     $  12.12     $  11.89     $  11.25     $  11.41
                                    -------            --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Net investment income.............     0.31                0.65         0.67         0.70         0.71         0.70
Net realized and unrealized gain
  (loss)..........................     0.64               (1.40)        0.75         0.32         0.62        (0.15)
                                    -------            --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Total from investment
  operations......................     0.95               (0.75)        1.42         1.02         1.33         0.55
                                    -------            --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Less dividends and distributions
  from:
  Net investment income...........    (0.31)              (0.69)       (0.67)       (0.70)       (0.69)       (0.71)
  Net realized gain...............    (0.01)              (0.04)       (0.05)       (0.09)       --           --
                                    -------            --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Total dividends and
  distributions...................    (0.32)              (0.73)       (0.72)       (0.79)       (0.69)       (0.71)
                                    -------            --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Net asset value, end of period....  $ 11.97            $  11.34     $  12.82     $  12.12     $  11.89     $  11.25
                                    =======             =======      =======      =======      =======      =======
TOTAL INVESTMENT RETURN...........     8.40%(1)           (5.98)%      11.99%        8.88%       12.04%        5.27%
RATIOS TO AVERAGE NET ASSETS:
Expenses..........................     0.99%(2)            0.96%        1.02%        1.14%        1.20%        1.21%
Net investment income.............     5.29%(2)            5.34%        5.25%        5.79%        6.06%        6.12%
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Net assets, end of period (in
  thousands)......................  $89,652            $ 86,405     $ 96,265     $ 75,918     $ 67,903     $ 60,304
Portfolio turnover rate...........        6%(1)              18%           9%          13%          30%          22%
</TABLE>
 
- ---------------
(1) Not annualized.
 
(2) Annualized.
 
                       See Notes to Financial Statements
<PAGE>   10
 
                 (This page has been left blank intentionally.)
<PAGE>   11
 
                 (This page has been left blank intentionally.)
<PAGE>   12

TRUSTEES
Jack F. Bennett
Michael Bozic
Charles A. Fiumefreddo
Edwin J. Garn
John R. Haire
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson
Paul Kolton
Michael E. Nugent
Philip J. Purcell
John L. Schroeder

OFFICERS
Charles A. Fiumefreddo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Sheldon Curtis
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

James F. Willison
Vice President

Thomas F. Caloia
Treasurer

TRANSFER AGENT
Dean Witter Trust Company
Harborside Financial Center - Plaza Two
Jersey City, New Jersey  07311

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
Price Waterhouse LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York  10036

INVESTMENT MANAGER
Dean Witter InterCapital Inc.
Two World Trade Center
New York, New York  10048

The financial statements included herein have been taken from the records of
the Fund without examination by the independent accounts and accordingly they
do not express an opinion thereon.

This report is submitted for the general information of shareholders of the
Fund. For more detailed information about the Fund, its officers and trustees,
fees, expenses and other pertinent information, please see the prospectus of
the Fund.

This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the
Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.

DEAN WITTER
SELECT MUNICIPAL
REINVESTMENT
FUND


Semiannual Report
June 30, 1995


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission