<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION
ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14A-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
</TABLE>
NORDSON CORPORATION
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
Not Applicable
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
Not Applicable
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
Not Applicable
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
Not Applicable
(5) Total fee paid:
Not Applicable
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
Not Applicable
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
Not Applicable
(3) Filing Party:
Not Applicable
(4) Date Filed:
Not Applicable
<PAGE> 2
NORDSON CORPORATION
------------------------------------------------
Notice of 1998
Annual Meeting
and Proxy Statement
[NORDSON LOGO]
<PAGE> 3
[NORDSON LOGO]
William P. Madar
Chairman of the Board
Edward P. Campbell
President and Chief
Executive Officer
January 30, 1998
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held at The Spitzer Conference Center, next to The Stocker Center, 1005 North
Abbe Road, Elyria, Ohio, at 5:30 p.m. on March 12, 1998. We hope that you will
be able to attend.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement, which are
included in this booklet, describe the matters to be acted upon at the meeting.
Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote on these matters is
important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to mark
your choices on the enclosed proxy card and to sign and return it in the
envelope provided. If you later decide to vote in person at the meeting, you
will have an opportunity to revoke your proxy and vote by ballot.
We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
Sincerely,
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
WILLIAM P. MADAR EDWARD P. CAMPBELL
Chairman of the Board President and Chief
Executive Officer
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 4
NORDSON CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Nordson Corporation will be held at The
Spitzer Conference Center, 1005 North Abbe Road, Elyria, Ohio, at 5:30 p.m. on
March 12, 1998. The purposes of the meeting are:
1. To elect three directors to the class whose term expires in 2001.
2. To consider the following proposed amendments to the Nordson Corporation
Regulations:
a. To increase the shareholder vote required to call a special meeting of
shareholders.
b. To increase the shareholder vote required to change the number of
directors and to give the Board of Directors unlimited discretion in
changing the number of directors.
c. To establish procedures for the proposal of business at a shareholders
meeting and to increase the notice period for the nomination of
directors.
d. To require the Company to advance legal fees to directors and officers.
e. To increase the shareholder vote required to amend certain provisions of
the Company's regulations.
3. To hear reports and to transact any other business that may properly come
before the meeting.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 13, 1998 are entitled
to notice of and to vote at the meeting.
For the Board of Directors
WILLIAM D. GINN
Secretary
January 30, 1998
<PAGE> 5
NORDSON CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
The Board of Directors of Nordson Corporation requests your proxy for use at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 12, 1998, and at any
adjournments of that meeting. This Proxy Statement is to inform you about the
matters to be acted upon at the meeting.
If you attend the meeting, you can vote your shares by ballot. If you do not
attend, your shares can still be voted at the meeting if you sign and return the
enclosed proxy card. Shares represented by a properly signed card will be voted
in accordance with the choices marked on the card. If no choices are marked, the
shares will be voted to elect the nominees listed on page 2 and will be voted
for the approval of each of the proposed amendments to Nordson's Regulations.
You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by giving notice to Nordson in
writing or orally at the meeting.
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card are being mailed to
shareholders on or about January 30, 1998. Nordson's executive offices are
located at 28601 Clemens Road, Westlake, Ohio 44145. Its telephone number is
(440) 892-1580.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nordson's Board of Directors is composed of ten directors, divided into two
classes of three members and one class of four members. The terms of these
classes as of the 1998 Annual Meeting will expire in 1999, 2000 and 2001. Each
of the directors serves for a term of three years and until a successor is
elected. The Board met six times during the last fiscal year.
Three nominees for election as directors with terms expiring in 2001, as well as
present directors whose terms will continue after the meeting, appear below.
1
<PAGE> 6
NOMINEES FOR TERMS EXPIRING IN 2001
WILLIAM D. GINN, age 74, has been a director of Nordson since 1959. Mr. Ginn has
been Of Counsel to Thompson Hine & Flory LLP, a law firm, since January 1993.
Prior to that time he was a Partner with Thompson Hine & Flory LLP for more than
five years. He is a director of The Davey Tree Expert Company, a tree and lawn
care company. Thompson Hine & Flory LLP has in the past provided and continues
to provide legal services to Nordson.
STEPHEN R. HARDIS, age 62, has been a director of Nordson since 1984. He has
served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Eaton Corporation since
January 1996 and was Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from September
1995 to December 1995. Mr. Hardis was Vice Chairman and Chief Financial and
Administrative Officer of Eaton Corporation from 1986 until September 1995.
Eaton produces automation systems and equipment, capital and consumer goods
components, aerospace and defense systems, and automotive components. Mr. Hardis
is a director of Eaton, KeyCorp, a bank holding company, Lexmark International,
Inc., a manufacturer and seller of computer printer products, and The
Progressive Corporation, an insurance holding company.
WILLIAM L. ROBINSON, age 56, has been a director of Nordson since July 1995. Mr.
Robinson has served as Dean of the District of Columbia School of Law (now UDC
School of Law) since 1988.
PRESENT DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 1999
DR. GLENN R. BROWN, age 67, has been a director of Nordson since 1986. Dr. Brown
has been the Science Adviser to the Governor of the State of Ohio since July
1996. He is a retired Senior Vice President and a former director of The
Standard Oil Company (now BP America, Inc.). He served as Vice Provost for
Corporate Research and Technology Transfer of Case Western Re-
2
<PAGE> 7
serve University from January 1991 to July 1993. He is a director of Ferro
Corporation, a producer of industrial specialty materials.
DR. ANNE O. KRUEGER, age 63, has been a director of Nordson since 1990. She has
been a Professor of Economics at Stanford University since July 1993 and a
Professor of Economics at Duke University from January 1987 to June 1993. She is
a director of Western Digital Corp., an international supplier of hard disk
drives for computers.
ERIC T. NORD, age 80, has been a director of Nordson or its predecessor since
1941. He served as Chairman of the Board of Nordson from 1967 to October 1997.
Eric Nord is Evan Nord's brother.
PRESENT DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 2000
WILLIAM P. MADAR, age 58, has been a director of Nordson since 1985. He has
served as Chairman of the Board of Nordson since October 1997 and was Vice
Chairman from August 1996 to October 1997. He was Chief Executive Officer of
Nordson from February 1986 to October 1997. From 1986 to August 1996, Mr. Madar
also served as President of Nordson. Mr. Madar is a director of National City
Bank, a national banking association, Brush Wellman Inc., a producer and
supplier of beryllium and related products, specialty metal systems, and
precious metal products, and The Lubrizol Corp., a manufacturer of specialty
chemicals.
WILLIAM W. COLVILLE, age 63, has been a director of Nordson since 1988. He was
Senior Vice President-Law, General Counsel, and Secretary of Owens-Corning
Fiberglas Corp. from 1984 until December 1994 and currently serves as Acting
Senior Vice President-Law, General Counsel, and Secretary of Owens-Corning.
Owens-Corning manufactures glass fiber products and related materials. Mr.
Colville is a director of Owens-Corning.
3
<PAGE> 8
EVAN W. NORD, age 78, has been a director of Nordson or its predecessor since
1942. He was Vice President and Treasurer of Nordson for more than five years
prior to his retirement in 1978. Evan Nord is Eric Nord's brother.
EDWARD P. CAMPBELL, age 48, was elected by the Board of Directors on August 2,
1996 to serve in a newly-created director position. He has served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of Nordson since October 1997 and was President and
Chief Operating Officer of Nordson from August 1996 to October 1997. Mr.
Campbell was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Nordson
from March 1994 to August 1996, and was a Vice President of Nordson from May
1988 to March 1994. He is a director of Victory Portfolios, Inc. and Key Funds,
Inc., public investment companies.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; ATTENDANCE
The present members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Ginn, Evan Nord and
Robinson, and Drs. Brown and Krueger. The Audit Committee reviews the proposed
audit programs (including both independent and internal audits) for each fiscal
year, the results of these audits, and the adequacy of Nordson's systems of
internal control. The Committee also recommends to the Board of Directors the
appointment of the independent auditors for each fiscal year. The Audit
Committee met three times during the last fiscal year.
The present members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Colville, Hardis,
Eric Nord and Dr. Krueger. The Compensation Committee determines the salary and
other compensation of Nordson's Chief Executive Officer, approves salary
increases for other executive officers, supervises the administration of
Nordson's 1993 Long-Term Performance Plan, as amended (the "Performance Plan"),
1995 Management Incentive
4
<PAGE> 9
Compensation Plan (the "Bonus Plan"), Excess Defined Benefit Pension Plan,
Excess Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, and other pension and retirement
plans. A 162(m) Compensation Subcommittee, comprised of Messrs. Colville and
Hardis and Dr. Krueger, determines the salary and other compensation of
Nordson's Chief Executive Officer. During the last fiscal year the Compensation
Committee met three times and the 162(m) Compensation Subcommittee met two
times.
The present members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Hardis, Madar, Eric
Nord and Dr. Brown, with Mr. Madar being a nonvoting member. The Nominating
Committee screens and nominates candidates for election as directors and
recommends committee members for appointment by the Board of Directors. A
shareholder who wishes to suggest a director candidate for consideration by the
Nominating Committee should send a resume of the candidate's business experience
and background to Mr. Campbell at Nordson. The Nominating Committee did not meet
during the last fiscal year.
During the last fiscal year, each director attended at least seventy-five
percent of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the committees on which
he or she served except Dr. Krueger, who attended fifty-eight percent of the
meetings.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Nordson pays the Chairman of the Board of Directors a fee of $10,000 per quarter
and $2,000 for each Board meeting attended. Nordson pays other directors who are
not employees a fee of $5,000 per quarter, and $1,000 for each Board meeting
attended. Each nonemployee director is also paid $1,000 for each committee
meeting attended, with an additional $400 per quarter for committee chairmen.
Directors may defer all or part of their fees until retirement under the
Performance Plan. The fees may be
5
<PAGE> 10
deferred as cash and credited with interest at a U.S. Treasury rate, or they may
be translated into stock equivalents based on the market price of Nordson Common
Shares when the fees are earned and credited with additional stock equivalents
when dividends are paid.
Each non-employee director was granted a director option on March 10, 1992 and
March 13, 1997. Non-employee directors are granted a director option annually.
OWNERSHIP OF NORDSON COMMON SHARES
The following table shows the number and percent of Nordson Common Shares
beneficially owned on January 13, 1998 by each of the directors, including
nominees, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table
set forth on page 14, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Name Shares (1) Percent
- ----------------------------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Dr. Glenn R. Brown
Edward P. Campbell (2)
William W. Colville
William D. Ginn (3)(5)(6)
Stephen R. Hardis
Dr. Anne O. Krueger
William P. Madar (2)
Eric T. Nord (4)(5)(7)
Evan W. Nord (7)(8)
William L. Robinson
John E. Jackson (2)
Yoshihiko Miyahara (2)
Donald J. McLane (2)
Christian C. Bernadotte (2)
All directors and executive
officers as a group (23
people) (9)
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* Less than 0.1%.
6
<PAGE> 11
(1) Except as otherwise stated in notes (2) through (9) below, beneficial
ownership of the shares held by each of the directors, executive officers
and nominees consists of sole voting power and sole investment power, or of
voting power and investment power that is shared with the spouse of the
nominee or director. Beneficial ownership of the shares held by the
non-employee directors includes the right to acquire shares on or before
March 14, 1998 under the Director Option provisions of the Performance Plan
and the Directors Deferred Compensation provisions of the Performance Plan
in the following amounts: Dr. Brown, shares; Mr. Colville,
shares; Mr. Hardis, shares; Dr. Krueger,
shares; Eric Nord, shares; and Mr. Robinson, shares. Mr.
Robinson has the right to acquire shares on or before March 14,
1998 under the Director Option provisions of the Performance Plan.
(2) These include the right to acquire shares on or before March 14, 1998 in
amounts as follows: Mr. Madar, shares; Mr. Campbell,
shares; Mr. Jackson, shares; Mr. Miyahara, shares; Mr.
McLane, shares; and Mr. Bernadotte, shares.
(3) These include shares held by Mr. Ginn as trustee of various trusts
for the children and grandchildren of Eric Nord.
(4) These include 326,058 shares held by The Nord Family Foundation. As trustee
of this foundation, Eric Nord has shared voting power and shared investment
power with respect to these shares.
(5) These include 180,000 shares held by the Eric and Jane Nord Foundation. As
trustees of this foundation, Eric Nord and Mr. Ginn have shared voting power
and shared investment power with respect to these shares.
(6) These include 6,000 shares held by the Ginn Family Fund. As a trustee of
this fund, Mr. Ginn has shared voting power and shared investment power with
respect to these shares.
(7) These include 1,002,780 shares held by Eric Nord and Evan Nord as
testamentary trustees under the will of Walter G. Nord, the founder of
Nordson. Eric
7
<PAGE> 12
Nord and Evan Nord have shared voting power and shared investment power with
respect to these shares.
(8) These include 500,000 shares held by the Cynthia W. Nord Charitable
Remainder Unitrust. As trust advisor of that trust Evan Nord has voting
power with respect to these shares.
(9) These include the shares held by The Nord Family Foundation. Beneficial
ownership of the shares held by each of the directors and officers as a
group consists of sole voting power with respect to shares, sole
voting and sole investment power with respect to shares, shared
voting power and shared investment power with respect to shares,
and the right to acquire shares on or before March 14, 1998.
As of November 2, 1997, present and former directors, officers, and employees of
Nordson and their families beneficially owned over million Nordson Common
Shares, representing more than % of the outstanding shares. Nordson is
party to an agreement that, with some exceptions, gives Nordson a right of first
refusal with respect to proposed sales of Nordson Common Shares by Evan Nord and
Eric Nord, individually or as testamentary trustees, Mr. Ginn, as trustee under
an Agreement with Walter G. Nord dated December 29, 1961 and as trustee under an
Agreement with Eric T. Nord dated June 2, 1978, and The Nord Family Foundation.
Except as described in the above table, to the best of Nordson's knowledge, no
person beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding Nordson Common Shares.
8
<PAGE> 13
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors, each
member of which is a non-employee director, is responsible for approving
executive management compensation and for administering the incentive and equity
participation plans which make up the variable compensation paid to executive
officers including the President. A 162(m) Compensation Subcommittee determines
the salary and other compensation of Nordson's Chief Executive Officer. The
Committee also administers employee stock plans and certain other benefit plans.
The Committee and the Board believe that the executive management compensation
program should support the goals and objectives of the Company. These goals and
objectives should balance the importance of annual financial performance with
the equally important creation and protection of long-term fundamentals which
support long-term growth and profitability.
Nordson's executive management compensation program:
-- establishes compensation performance objectives that are directly linked to
corporate goals;
-- provides a high degree of leverage between compensation and corporate
performance;
-- creates long-term incentives directly linked to shareholder returns; and
-- is designed to attract, retain and motivate key executives.
9
<PAGE> 14
Total Cash Compensation
Nordson's corporate goal is to double the value of the Company over a five-year
period, with the primary value set by the market for Company shares. Two annual
performance objectives to support the achievement of this goal have been
established: 1) an annual return on average invested capital of 16%; and 2)
earnings per share growth of 15% per year.
The Committee believes that consistent achievement of these two objectives will
lead to doubling the value of the Company over a five-year period. The cash
compensation program for executive officers, including the Chief Executive
Officer ("Officers"), which consists of a fixed annual base salary plus an
annual cash bonus, is designed to link directly to the achievement of these two
annual performance objectives.
In establishing the Officer cash compensation levels, the Committee uses a peer
group of approximately 250 companies having similar sales volume and/or market
value. This is a changing group of companies, with which Nordson would compete
for Nordson executive talent or be a source from which future executives might
be recruited.
This comparison group of companies is not identical to the companies included in
the S&P 500 Index or the S&P Diversified Manufacturing Index used in the
performance graph appearing on page 23. Nordson believes that these indices are
a useful comparison for purposes of comparing Nordson's share price performance
to the performance of a broad group of comparable companies. However, the
companies included in these indices are not necessarily companies with which
Nordson competes for executive talent or that would be a source from which
future executives may be recruited, and are therefore an inappropriate group of
companies for purposes of establishing cash compensation levels.
10
<PAGE> 15
The Officer cash compensation program is designed such that if Nordson's
financial performance is equal to the median financial performance of the peer
group of companies, each Officer's total cash compensation will be less than the
median compensation for similar positions in the peer group. As Nordson
performance increases above the median for the peer group, Officer total cash
compensation will increase correspondingly such that the percentile ranking of
each Officer's total cash compensation will correlate with the percentile
ranking of Nordson performance.
Base Salary
Officers' base salaries are targeted at the 50th percentile salary for similar
positions within the peer group of companies. The Committee reviews the
competitiveness of Officers' base salaries annually and if
appropriate, salaries are changed based upon individual performance, competitive
position and salary practices of the peer group companies.
Annual Cash Bonus
The bonus portion of cash compensation is paid pursuant to the Bonus Plan and is
highly leveraged to achievement of the two corporate performance objectives.
In the Bonus Plan for 1997, 50% of the cash bonus eligibility was based on the
return on average invested capital component of the plan, with a bonus to be
paid if Nordson's annual return was at least 8%, and attaining its maximum when
the return reached 16%. The remaining 50% of the cash bonus eligibility was
based on the earnings per share component, with a bonus to be paid if Nordson's
earnings per share growth was positive, and attaining its maximum when growth
reached 20%.
Nordson achieved a 1997 return on average invested capital of 18% which exceeded
the corporate objective
11
<PAGE> 16
of 16%. There was no earnings per share growth. Since performance exceeded the
threshold payment level, Mr. Madar and the other Officers were paid bonuses
based upon the factors described above.
Stock Options
The Committee believes that through the use of stock options, Officer interests
are directly tied with those of the Company's shareholders.
Officers are issued stock option grants annually with an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. These options are not
fully exercisable until four years following the date of grant and expire in ten
years, to reinforce a long-term perspective and to help retain key executives.
The intent is to provide stock option grants competitive with those offered to
similar positions within the peer group of companies.
Deduction Limitation on Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the
regulations thereunder, precludes a publicly-held corporation from taking a
deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid or accrued with
respect to certain of the Officers. This provision became effective for the
Company's tax year beginning October 31, 1994.
On March 9, 1995, the shareholders approved the Bonus Plan. The Committee
believes that the Bonus Plan satisfies the Internal Revenue Service's
requirements for "performance-based" compensation which would not be subject to
the deductibility limitation under applicable Internal Revenue Service
regulations. On March 10, 1993, the shareholders approved the Performance Plan.
On March 13, 1997 the shareholders approved an amendment to the Performance Plan
to satisfy the Internal Revenue Service's current requirements for
"performance-based" compensation. The Committee will
12
<PAGE> 17
continue to monitor its compensation policy, including compensation, if any,
paid under the Bonus Plan and the Performance Plan, for deductibility under
these regulations.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
William W. Colville, Chairman
Stephen R. Hardis
Dr. Anne O. Krueger
Eric T. Nord
January 30, 1998
13
<PAGE> 18
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth individual compensation information for the
fiscal year ended November 2, 1997, for William P. Madar, Edward P. Campbell,
and the four other most highly compensated executive officers whose total annual
salary and bonus for the fiscal year ended November 2, 1997 exceeded $100,000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Compensation
----------------------------------
Other
Name Annual
And Principal Salary Bonus Compensation
Position Year ($) ($) ($)
- ------------------------ ---- ------- ------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
William P. Madar(2) 1997 690,000 414,000 33,173(3)
Chairman 1996 655,000 561,700 0
of the Board 1995 627,000 681,200 0
Edward P. Campbell(5) 1997 350,000 210,000 52,648(6)
President & Chief 1996 325,000 278,700 0
Executive Officer 1995 304,000 330,250 0
John E. Jackson 1997 261,000 127,237 0
Senior Vice President 1996 250,000 174,200 0
1995 240,000 211,850 0
Yoshihiko Miyahara(7) 1997 303,490 56,904 0
Vice President 1996 327,807 85,230 0
1995 363,199 122,580 0
Donald J. McLane 1997 215,000 104,812 0
Vice President 1996 202,000 140,750 0
1995 190,000 167,700 0
Christian C. Bernadotte 1997 204,000 99,450 0
Vice President 1996 190,000 132,350 0
1995 182,000 160,650 0
<CAPTION>
Long-Term Compensation
------------------------
Awards
------------------------
Name Restricted All Other
And Principal Stock Awards Options/ Compensation
Position ($) SARs (#) ($) (1)
- ------------------------ ------------ -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
William P. Madar(2) 0 70,000 9,661,411 (4)
Chairman 0 70,000 76,899
of the Board 0 70,000 41,630
Edward P. Campbell(5) 0 30,000 26,817
President & Chief 0 30,000 32,122
Executive Officer 0 30,000 16,589
John E. Jackson 0 16,000 19,191
Senior Vice President 0 16,000 25,780
0 16,000 15,167
Yoshihiko Miyahara(7) 0 12,000 0
Vice President 0 12,000 0
0 10,500 0
Donald J. McLane 0 12,000 15,146
Vice President 0 12,000 20,239
0 10,500 11,728
Christian C. Bernadotte 0 12,000 14,110
Vice President 0 10,000 17,449
0 8,000 17,819
</TABLE>
14
<PAGE> 19
- ---------------
(1) Includes in each case, employer matching and allocations made to Nordson
Corporation's Employee Savings Trust Plan and Supplemental Plan; and
Nordson's Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Supplemental Plan as follows:
Mr. Madar, $40,248 and $17,772; Mr. Campbell, $19,773 and $7,044; Mr.
Jackson, $13,906 and $5,285; Mr. McLane, $11,151 and $3,995; and Mr.
Bernadotte, $10,584 and $3,526, respectively.
(2) Mr. Madar retired as Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nordson
Corporation on October 31, 1997.
(3) Represents a one-time accrued vacation payout.
(4) Amounts reported in this column for 1997 reflect payments to Mr. Madar in
regard to his retirement, including the following: payments of $8,225,972
from the Excess Defined Benefit Pension Plan, taken as a lump sum pursuant
to his employment agreement; and $1,377,419 from the Excess Defined
Contribution Retirement Plan, consisting of deferred salary accumulated
during Mr. Madar's eleven years of employment and Company matching funds
pursuant to the Plan.
(5) Mr. Campbell became President and Chief Executive Officer of Nordson
Corporation on October 31, 1997.
(6) Amounts reported in this column for 1997 reflect a $29,425 one-time fee paid
on behalf of Mr. Campbell for a club membership and personal benefits
including a $14,000 car allowance.
(7) Mr. Miyahara's salary and bonus are stated in U.S. Dollars and reflect the
average annual Japanese Yen exchange rate in effect during each of the
fiscal years noted.
15
<PAGE> 20
OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
The following table sets forth information regarding individual grants of stock
options/SARs made during the fiscal year ended November 2, 1997 to each
executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
---------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL
SECURITIES OPTIONS/SARS
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE OR GRANT DATE
OPTIONS/SARS EMPLOYEES IN BASE PRICE EXPIRATION PRESENT VALUE
NAME GRANTED (1) (2) FISCAL YEAR ($/SHARE) DATE ($) (3)
- ------------------ --------------- ------------ ----------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
William P. Madar 70,000 19.9% 55.25 11/04/2006
Edward P. Campbell 30,000 8.5% 55.25 11/04/2006
John E. Jackson 16,000 4.5% 55.25 11/04/2006
Yoshihiko Miyahara 12,000 3.4% 55.25 11/04/2006
Donald J. McLane 12,000 3.4% 55.25 11/04/2006
Christian C.
Bernadotte 12,000 3.4% 55.25 11/04/2006
</TABLE>
- ---------------
(1) All options become exercisable beginning one year after grant date at 25%
per year on a cumulative basis. The exercise price was equal to the fair
market value on the date of grant. The exercise price and tax withholding
obligations related to the exercise may be paid by cash, delivery of already
owned shares, or by offset of the underlying shares, or any combination
thereof.
16
<PAGE> 21
(2) No stock appreciation rights ("SARs") were granted to any employee other
than stock appreciation rights ("Limited Rights") that become exercisable
only upon the occurrence of a change in control of Nordson.
(3) These values were calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
Black-Scholes model is a complicated mathematical formula which is widely
used and accepted for valuing traded stock options. The actual value, if
any, an executive may realize will depend on the excess of the stock price
over the exercise price on the date the options are exercised, and no
assurance exists that the value realized by an executive will be at or near
the value estimated by the Black-Scholes model. The following assumptions
were used in these calculations:
(a) Exercise at any time;
(b) Volatility factor;
(c) Assumed risk-free rate of interest;
(d) Dividend of $.20 per share per quarter; and
(e) No reduction in the value calculated has been made for possible
forfeitures.
17
<PAGE> 22
AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION/SAR VALUES
The following table sets forth information regarding each exercise of stock
options/SARs during the fiscal year ended November 2, 1997, by each executive
officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and the value of unexercised
stock options/SARs held by each executive officer named in the Summary
Compensation Table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES VALUE OF
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
NUMBER OF OPTIONS/SARS AT OPTIONS/SARS AT
SECURITIES FY-END (#) FY-END(2) ($)
UNDERLYING VALUE
OPTIONS/SARS REALIZED(1) EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME EXERCISED ($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ------------------ ------------ -------- --------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
William P. Madar 97,024 3,411,946 264,515/ 1,103,092/
122,500 0
Edward P. Campbell 9,300 350,244 133,800/ 1,527,639/
52,500 0
John E. Jackson 38,400 1,407,318 86,000/ 739,500/
28,000 0
Yoshihiko Miyahara 9,000 117,000 34,875/ 27,615/
20,625 0
Donald J. McLane 49,200 1,908,488 44,875/ 121,665/
20,625 0
Christian C.
Bernadotte 1,248 46,566 22,820/ 85,567/
19,720 0
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE> 23
- ---------------
(1) Represents the difference between the option exercise price and the last
sales price of a common share on the NASDAQ National Market System on the
date prior to exercise.
(2) Based on the last sales price of the common shares of $49.63 on the NASDAQ
National Market System on October 31, 1997. The ultimate realization of
profit on the sale of the common shares underlying such options is dependent
upon the market price of such shares on the date of sale.
19
<PAGE> 24
SALARIED EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN
Benefits under the U.S. Salaried Employees' Pension Plan are based on average
annual compensation (salaries, commissions, and incentive bonuses) for the
highest five years during the last 10 years of employment prior to retirement.
The following table shows the annual benefit payable under the Plan at age 65.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Final
Average Years of Benefit Service
Annual --------------------------------------------------------------
Compensation 10 15 20 25 30
- ------------ -------- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
100,000 13,028 19,544 26,056 32,572 39,088
200,000 31,359 47,044 62,719 78,403 94,088
300,000 49,691 74,544 99,382 124,235 149,088
500,000 86,354 129,544 172,708 215,898 259,088
800,000 141,348 212,044 282,697 353,392 424,088
1,100,000 196,343 294,544 392,686 490,887 589,088
1,400,000 251,337 377,044 502,675 628,382 754,088
1,700,000 306,332 459,544 612,664 765,876 919,088
1,900,000 342,875 514,544 685,990 857,539 1,029,088
2,100,000 379,658 569,544 759,316 949,202 1,139,088
2,200,000 397,989 597,044 795,979 995,033 1,194,088
2,300,000 416,321 624,544 832,642 1,040,865 1,249,088
2,400,000 434,652 652,044 869,305 1,086,696 1,304,088
2,500,000 452,984 679,544 905,968 1,132,528 1,359,088
2,600,000 471,315 707,044 942,631 1,178,359 1,414,088
2,700,000 489,647 734,544 979,294 1,224,191 1,469,088
2,800,000 507,979 762,044 1,015,957 1,270,022 1,524,088
3,000,000 544,641 817,044 1,089,283 1,361,685 1,634,088
</TABLE>
The amounts shown in the table represent the annual benefit (after reduction for
Social Security payments) payable to an employee for life. Certain surviving
spouse benefits are also available under the Plan, as well as early retirement
benefits. The table has been prepared without regard to benefit limitations
imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue
Code"). The years of benefit service credited under the Plan as of November 2,
1997 for the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table who
participate in the Plan are as follows: Mr. Madar - 11 years; Mr. Campbell - 9
years; Mr. Jackson - 11 years; Mr. McLane - 22 years; and
20
<PAGE> 25
Mr. Bernadotte - 11 years. Mr. Miyahara is not included in the pension plan
described above but is covered by a pension arrangement that is specific to
Nordson K.K., the Japanese subsidiary.
EXCESS DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN AND
EXCESS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN
The Internal Revenue Code limits the benefits provided under the Salaried
Employees' Pension Plan, the amount that an employee can contribute to the
Employees' Savings Trust Plan, and the amount that Nordson can contribute on
behalf of an employee under the Employees' Savings Trust Plan and the Employee
Stock Ownership Plan.
The Excess Defined Benefit Pension Plan provides for the payment, out of
Nordson's general funds, of the amount by which certain participants' benefits
under the Salaried Employees' Pension Plan would exceed the limitations
applicable to that Plan. The terms of payment under the Excess Defined Benefit
Pension Plan are the same as those under the Salaried Employees' Pension Plan.
The table on page 20, which does not reflect benefit limitations imposed by the
Internal Revenue Code, shows the aggregate annual pension benefits payable under
both the Salaried Employees' Pension Plan and the Excess Defined Benefit Pension
Plan.
The Excess Defined Contribution Retirement Plan provides for the payment, out of
Nordson's general funds, of the amount by which the participant's contributions
under the Employees' Savings Trust Plan and Nordson's contributions to the
Employees' Savings Trust Plan and the Employee Stock Ownership Plan would exceed
the limitations applicable to those Plans. Salaried employees who are designated
by the Compensation Committee and who participate in the Employees' Savings
Trust Plan or the Employee Stock Ownership Plan are eligible to participate in
the Excess Defined
21
<PAGE> 26
Contribution Retirement Plan. Payments under the Excess Defined Contribution
Retirement Plan may be made either in lump sum or in monthly installments over a
two-year period. The Compensation Committee administers the Excess Defined
Contribution Retirement Plan.
Benefits under the Excess Defined Contribution Retirement Plan resulting from
the Internal Revenue Code limitations applicable to the Employees' Savings Trust
Plan will be paid in cash, and benefits resulting from the Internal Revenue Code
limitations applicable to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan will be paid in
Nordson Common Shares. The amount to be paid in Nordson Common Shares is based
on the benefits that participating employees would have received under the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan if the Internal Revenue Code Limitations
applicable to that plan had not been in effect.
The portions of Nordson's contributions under the Excess Defined Contribution
Retirement Plan allocated to the accounts of the executive officers named in the
compensation table except Mr. Miyahara, who does not participate in the plan,
and to all current executive officers as a group during the fiscal year ended
November 2, 1997 are as follows: Mr. Madar - $35,748 and 277 shares; Mr.
Campbell - $15,273 and 94 shares; Mr. Jackson - $9,406 and 64 shares; Mr. McLane
- - $6,651 and 42 shares; Mr. Bernadotte - $6,084 and 34 shares; and all current
executive officers as a group - $96,468 and 646 shares.
22
<PAGE> 27
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following is a graph which compares the five year cumulative return from
investing $100 on October 30, 1992 in each of Nordson Corporation Common Shares,
the S&P 500 Index of companies and the S&P Diversified Manufacturing Index of
companies, with dividends assumed to be reinvested when received.
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURNS
INDEXED RETURNS
[GRAPH]
(Dividends Reinvested)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
S&P
DIVERSIFIED
MEASUREMENT PERIOD NORDSON S&P 500 MANUFACTURING
(FISCAL YEAR COVERED) CORP. INDEX INDEX
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1992 100 100 100
1993 115.03 114.94 121.12
1994 121.62 119.39 133.59
1995 126.85 150.96 168.65
1996 122.37 187.33 233.01
1997 111.92 247.48 291.04
</TABLE>
Assumes $100 invested on October 30, 1992 in Nordson Corporation,
S&P 500 Index, and S&P Diversified Manufacturing Index. Total return assumes
reinvestment of dividends.
23
<PAGE> 28
AGREEMENTS WITH OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
In January 1986, Nordson entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Madar.
The agreement had an initial five-year term, and was extended automatically for
additional one-year terms unless terminated by either party upon certain
conditions. The agreement was amended in March 1993 and conformed the method for
determining Mr. Madar's cash compensation beginning in fiscal year 1994 to that
used to establish the cash compensation for the other executive officers. As
amended, the agreement provided for the continued employment of Mr. Madar until
terminated by either party upon certain conditions.
The amended agreement provided that Mr. Madar would receive a supplemental
pension benefit that, in effect, maintained the benefits he would have received
if he had remained with his former employer, and this benefit is essentially
unchanged from the unamended January 1986 agreement. The amount of the benefit
is equal to a percentage of his highest annual compensation (base salary and
incentive compensation) over the 36 consecutive month period producing the
highest average compensation reduced by the sum of the benefits payable under
the pension plans of Nordson and his former employer and one-half of his
estimated Social Security benefit. The percentage would be 56%, subject to
reduction if the total number of years of employment with Nordson and his former
employer is less than 35. (Mr. Madar had 20 and 2/3 years of employment with his
former employer). The benefit would also be reduced by 5% per year for
retirement before age 60. The benefit could, at Mr. Madar's election, be paid in
a lump sum or in any other form permitted under the Salaried Employees' Pension
Plan. Mr. Madar terminated his employment from the Company on October 31, 1997
by reason of his retirement and elected to receive his supplemental pension
benefit in a lump sum.
24
<PAGE> 29
On October 31, 1997, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr.
Madar. The agreement's term runs from November 3, 1997 to October 31, 1999 and
provides for payments of $25,000 per quarter, plus reimbursement of certain
expenses, for the term of the agreement.
Nordson has also agreed to provide Mr. Jackson with a supplemental pension
benefit in order to restore the benefits he would have received if he had
remained with his former employer. This benefit is calculated on the same basis
as Mr. Madar's supplemental pension benefit. Mr. Jackson had 14 years of
employment with his former employer.
Nordson has also agreed to provide Mr. Campbell with a supplemental pension
benefit in order to restore some of the benefits he would have received if he
had remained with his former employer. Mr. Campbell's supplemental pension
benefit will equal the amount by which his pension benefit under the Salaried
Employees' Pension Plan would be increased if his prior service with his former
employer were recognized under the plan. His highest average annual compensation
and reduction in benefit if he retires before age 60 will be calculated on the
same basis as under Mr. Madar's and Mr. Jackson's supplemental pension benefits.
Mr. Campbell's amount of benefit will also be reduced by the benefits payable
under his former employer's pension plan. Mr. Campbell had 11 years of
employment with his former employer.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION IN COMPENSATION
DECISIONS
Eric Nord, who serves on the Compensation Committee, was formerly President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
25
<PAGE> 30
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY'S REGULATIONS
(PROPOSALS NO. 1 THROUGH 5)
At a meeting held on October 31, 1997, the Company's Board of Directors
approved, and recommended that the Company's shareholders adopt, amendments to
the Company's existing regulations. These amendments, which would be included in
the 1998 Amended Regulations of the Company, are the following: (1) an increase
in the shareholder vote required to call a special meeting of shareholders from
25% to 50%, (2) an increase in the shareholder vote required to change the
number of directors from a majority of the shares represented at the meeting to
80% of the outstanding shares, while giving the Board of Directors unlimited
discretion in changing the number of directors, (3) the establishment of
procedures applicable to the proposal of business at a shareholders meeting and
an increase in the notice period for the nomination by shareholders of
candidates for election as directors, (4) a requirement that the Company advance
legal fees to directors and officers in the event of a pending or threatened
action against them by reason of the fact that they are or were directors or
officers of the Company, and (5) an increase in the shareholder vote required to
amend the foregoing provisions and certain other provisions of the Company's
regulations from a majority to 80% of the outstanding shares.
In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
shareholders are being asked to vote on each of these proposed amendments
separately. For convenience, the amendments that are adopted by the shareholders
will be incorporated into the 1998 Amended Regulations of the Company;
accordingly, a vote to approve any of the amendments will be deemed to be a vote
to adopt the 1998 Amended Regulations that incorporate that amendment.
26
<PAGE> 31
The text of the amendments is included at the end of this proxy statement.
Although the following description is a summary of the material changes made by
the proposed amendments, it should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified
by reference to, the full text amendments.
BACKGROUND; ANTITAKEOVER EFFECT
In 1997, the Company undertook an analysis of its articles of incorporation,
regulations, and shareholder rights plan to determine whether they should be
changed in order to enhance the ability of the Company's Board of Directors to
promote the interests of the Company and its shareholders, employees, and other
constituents in the context of an unsolicited tender offer for the Company. This
analysis was occasioned by the scheduled expiration of the shareholder rights
plan in September 1998, and not by a perceived threat of any specific takeover
attempt. The Company is not aware of any such attempt. The Company does not
presently intend to propose other antitakeover measures in future proxy
solicitations.
As a result of this analysis, the Company's Board of Directors concluded that
changes should be made to the Company's existing regulations in order to address
the possibility that an unsolicited tender offer for the Company might be
coupled with a proxy contest designed to undermine the effectiveness of the
Board. If confronted with an unsolicited tender offer, it is likely that the
Company's Board of Directors would seek to evaluate the terms of the tender
offer while exploring other strategic alternatives, including the possibility of
negotiating a higher price for the Company. In order to prevent the Company from
pursuing other alternatives and to undermine the Board's bargaining power, the
person making the tender offer or arbitragers might solicit consents to call a
special meeting of shareholders and then solicit proxies for the purpose of
increasing the number of directors and electing its own candidates as
27
<PAGE> 32
directors ("packing" the Board) or taking other measures intended to force a
sale of the Company. The proposed amendments would make it more difficult for
the person making the tender offer to call a special meeting and, if a meeting
were called, to increase the number of directors in order to "pack" the Board.
They would also require advance notice of, and the disclosure of material
information about, any shareholder proposals to be brought before the meeting.
The Company's regulations currently provide for a classified Board of Directors,
comprised of two classes of three members and one class of four members. The
existence of a classified board, together with the ability to remove a director
only for cause, would make more difficult any hostile attempt to take control of
the Company through a proxy contest. In order to change the membership of a
majority of the Board of Directors, at least two years would be required. The
Company's Articles of Incorporation currently provide that, unless a "fair
price" requirement and other conditions are met, the affirmative vote of the
holders of 80% of the outstanding shares is required to approve certain
transactions between the Company and an "interested shareholder," including a
merger or consolidation, certain dispositions of assets or issuances of
securities, the liquidation or dissolution of the Company proposed by an
interested shareholder, or certain reclassifications or recapitalizations. An
"interested shareholder" is defined as any person that, together with its
affiliates or associates, is the beneficial owner of shares with at least 20% of
the voting power of the Company in elections of directors.
The proposed amendments could have the effect of deterring certain persons from
initiating an unsolicited tender offer or a proxy contest. Such a tender offer
and proxy contest could, at least temporarily, increase the market price of the
Company's shares. Consequently, if the proposed amendments are adopted, and
under that set of circumstances, the Company's shareholders
28
<PAGE> 33
could be deprived of an opportunity to sell their shares at higher market
prices. Moreover, by possibly deterring an unsolicited tender offer or proxy
contest, the proposed amendments might have the incidental effect of inhibiting
certain changes in the Company's directors and management, some or all of whom
might be replaced in the course of a change in control. The Company's Board of
Directors believes, however, that the proposed amendments would enhance the
ability of the Board to act in the interests of the Company and its shareholders
in connection with an unsolicited tender offer and that this benefit outweighs
any negative antitakeover effects that the proposed amendments might have.
PROPOSAL 1: INCREASE IN THE SHAREHOLDER VOTE REQUIRED TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING
OF SHAREHOLDERS FROM 25% TO 50%.
DESCRIPTION. The Company's existing regulations provide that the holders of 25%
of all the shares outstanding and entitled to vote may call a special meeting of
shareholders. Proposal 1 would increase this percentage from 25% to 50%.
This proposed amendment would also provide that, in addition to the Secretary
and Assistant Secretary specified in the Company's existing regulations, the
President and any Vice President could give (or direct the giving of) notice of
a special meeting of shareholders.
DISCUSSION. Under the Ohio General Corporation Law (the "Ohio Law"), the holders
of 25% of the outstanding shares may call a special meeting of shareholders
unless the articles of incorporation or regulations specify a smaller or larger
percentage. The percentage may not, however, exceed 50%. This proposed amendment
would, therefore, increase to the maximum the percentage of outstanding shares
that would be required to call a special meeting.
29
<PAGE> 34
As discussed above, the purpose of this proposed amendment is to make it more
difficult for a person to call a special meeting of shareholders that, in the
context of an unsolicited tender offer, might prevent the Company from pursuing
other alternatives or undermine the Board's bargaining power. It would not,
however, preclude the calling of a special meeting with the consent of the
holders of 50% or more of the outstanding shares. Nor would it preclude any
shareholder from proposing business, or nominating candidates for election as
directors, at an annual meeting of shareholders, provided applicable procedures
were followed. See Proposal 3: Establishment of procedures applicable to the
proposal of business at a shareholders meeting and an increase in the notice
period for the nomination of candidates for election as directors. This proposed
amendment would apply to every special meeting of shareholders, whether or not
in the context of an unsolicited tender offer.
If adopted, this amendment would be included as Section 2 and Section 3, Article
I, of the 1998 Amended Regulations.
PROPOSAL 2: INCREASE IN THE SHAREHOLDER VOTE REQUIRED TO CHANGE THE NUMBER OF
DIRECTORS FROM A MAJORITY OF THE SHARES REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING TO 80% OF THE
OUTSTANDING SHARES; GIVING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNLIMITED DISCRETION IN
CHANGING THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS.
DESCRIPTION. The Company's existing regulations provide that the Board of
Directors will be divided into three classes consisting of not less than three
directors each. The existing regulations also provide that the number of
directors may be fixed or changed (1) by the shareholders at any meeting of
shareholders called to elect directors at which a quorum is present, by the vote
of the holders of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting, or (2) by
the directors at any meeting of the Board of Directors, by the vote of a
majority of the
30
<PAGE> 35
directors then in office. After the number of directors in any class has been
fixed by the shareholders, however, the directors may not increase or decrease
that number by more than one.
Proposal 2 would increase the shareholder vote required to change the number of
directors from a majority of the shares represented at the meeting to 80% of the
outstanding shares and eliminate the restriction on the number of directors that
may be added or subtracted by the Board of Directors.
DISCUSSION. As discussed above, the purpose of this proposed amendment is to
make it more difficult -- particularly in the context of an unsolicited tender
offer -- for a person to "pack" the Company's Board of Directors by increasing
the number of directors and electing its own candidates as directors. In the
context of an unsolicited tender offer, the Board of Directors believes that the
directors previously elected by the Company's shareholders would be more likely
to act aggressively on behalf of the Company and its shareholders, whether in
negotiating a possible sale of the Company or in pursuing other alternatives,
than would candidates nominated by the person making the tender offer or
arbitragers. The proposed amendment would, however, apply to every meeting of
shareholders, whether or not in the context of an unsolicited tender offer, and
could, in conjunction with the classification of the Board of Directors, make it
more difficult for shareholders to alter the composition of the Board.
A minority of shareholders holding over 20% of the Company's Common Shares could
block a change in the number of directors proposed at any meeting of
shareholders called to elect directors that may be desired by a majority of
shareholders. The executive officers and directors of the Company currently
beneficially own, in the aggregate, Common Shares, or approximately
% of the Common Shares outstanding.
31
<PAGE> 36
If adopted, this amendment would be included as Section 1, Article II, of the
1998 Amended Regulations.
PROPOSAL 3: ESTABLISHMENT OF PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSAL OF BUSINESS
AT A SHAREHOLDERS MEETING; INCREASE IN THE NOTICE PERIOD FOR THE NOMINATION OF
CANDIDATES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS
DESCRIPTION. The Company's existing regulations contain procedures for the
nomination of candidates for election as directors, but not for the proposal of
other business at shareholders meetings. Proposal 3 would establish procedures
applicable to the proposal of business at shareholders meetings and increase the
notice period for the nomination of candidates for election as directors.
Under this proposed amendment, the Chairman of the Board, or another officer
designated by the Board of Directors, would call shareholders meetings to order
and will preside at the meetings. The presiding officer would determine the
order of business at the meeting and have the authority to regulate the conduct
of the meeting, including limiting the persons (other than shareholders and
their duly appointed proxies) who may attend the meeting; determining whether
any shareholder or his or her proxy should be excluded from the meeting because
the shareholder or proxy has disrupted or is likely to disrupt the meeting;
determining the circumstances in which any person may make a statement or ask
questions at the meeting; and establishing such other procedures as the
presiding officer may deem appropriate for the orderly conduct of the meeting.
Under this proposed amendment, at an annual meeting of shareholders, only
business that is properly brought before the meeting will be considered. To be
properly brought before an annual meeting of shareholders, business must be
specified in the notice of the meeting, or
32
<PAGE> 37
any supplement to that notice, brought before the meeting by the presiding
officer or by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, or properly
requested by a shareholder to be brought before the meeting.
For business to be properly requested by a shareholder to be brought before an
annual meeting, the shareholder must (1) be a shareholder of the Company of
record at the time of the giving of the notice for the meeting and at the time
of the meeting, (2) be entitled to vote at the meeting, and (3) have given
timely written notice of the business to the Secretary. To be timely, a
shareholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the
principal executive offices of the Company not less than 60 nor more than 90
days prior to the annual meeting; except that, if the first public announcement
of the date of the meeting is not made at least 70 days prior to the date of the
meeting, notice by the shareholder will be timely if it is received not later
than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which the first
public announcement of the date of the meeting is made. A shareholder's notice
must set forth, as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the
meeting, a description in reasonable detail of the business proposed to be
brought before the meeting, the name and address of the shareholder proposing
such business and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal
is made, the class and number of shares that are owned of record and
beneficially by the shareholder proposing the business and by the beneficial
owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, and any material interest
of such shareholder or beneficial owner in such business. This provision will
not affect any rights that the shareholder may have under rules promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission to request the inclusion of proposals in
the Company's proxy statement.
Similarly, at a special meeting of shareholders, only such business as is
properly brought before the meeting will be conducted. To be properly brought
before a special
33
<PAGE> 38
meeting, business must be (1) specified in the notice of the meeting (or any
supplement to that notice) given by or at the direction of the President, a Vice
President, the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, or (2) brought before the
meeting by the presiding officer or by or at the direction of the Board of
Directors. If shareholders comply with the procedures for calling a special
meeting, the purposes of the meeting will be specified in the notice of the
meeting. See Proposal 1: Increase in the shareholder vote required to call a
special meeting of shareholders from 25% to 50%.
The procedures for the nomination by shareholders of candidates for election as
directors in the Company's existing regulations require advance notice of the
nominations as well as the disclosure of material information about the
shareholder making the nomination and the candidate being nominated. To be
timely under the existing regulations, the notice and information must be given
at least 30 days before the shareholders meeting. Under the proposed amendment,
the notice and information would need to be received by the Company not less
than 60 nor more than 90 days prior to the meeting; except that, if the first
public announcement of the date of the meeting is not made at least 70 days
prior to the date of the meeting, notice by the shareholder will be timely if it
is received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the
day on which the first public announcement of the date of the meeting is made.
DISCUSSION. The Company's Board of Directors believes that the procedures for
the proposal of business at shareholders meetings will enable the presiding
officer to run an orderly meeting, notwithstanding the presentation of contested
business. In addition, the requirement of advance notice and information, both
for business to be presented at the meeting and for the nomination of candidates
for election as directors, will give the Company's Board of Directors the time
and information needed to consider the proposed business
34
<PAGE> 39
or candidates, to inform shareholders, and, if appropriate, to give shareholders
the benefits of the Board's recommendations. The 30 day notice period for
director nominations in the Company's existing regulations was too short for
these purposes.
It is possible that this proposed amendment would discourage a shareholder from
presenting business at a shareholders meeting, or nominating candidates for
election as directors, if the shareholder cannot or does not wish to meet the
notice and information requirements. If so, shareholders would be deprived of an
opportunity to consider and vote upon the business or nominations.
If adopted, this amendment would be included as Section 7 of Article I, and
Section 3 of Article II, of the 1998 Amended Regulations.
PROPOSAL 4: REQUIREMENT THAT THE COMPANY ADVANCE LEGAL FEES TO DIRECTORS AND
OFFICERS
DESCRIPTION. The Company's existing regulations provide that the Company will
indemnify, to the full extent permitted or authorized by the Ohio Law, any
person made or threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or
completed action, suit, or proceeding by reason of the fact that he is or was a
director, officer, or employee of the Company, or is or was serving at the
request of the Company as a director, trustee, officer, employee, or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise.
Under Proposal 4, the Company would also pay, to the full extent permitted or
authorized by the Ohio Law, expenses, including attorneys' fees, as they are
incurred by any director or officer in defending any such action, suit, or
proceeding.
DISCUSSION. Under the Ohio Law, unless a corporation's articles or regulations
otherwise provide and unless the liability asserted involves certain improper
distributions or loans to directors, officer, or sharehold-
35
<PAGE> 40
ers, a corporation is required to advance expenses, including attorneys' fees,
as they are incurred by a director in defending such an action, suit, or
proceeding upon receipt by the corporation of an undertaking in which the
director agrees to (1) repay the amount if it is proved by clear and convincing
evidence in a court of competent jurisdiction that his act or omission was
undertaken with deliberate intent to cause injury to the corporation or with
reckless disregard for the best interests of the corporation, and (2) reasonably
cooperate with the corporation concerning the action, suit, or proceeding.
Under the Ohio Law, a corporation is permitted to advance expenses, including
attorneys' fees, as they are incurred by a director or officer in defending such
an action, suit, or proceeding, as authorized by the directors in a specific
case, upon receipt by the corporation of an undertaking in which the director or
officer agrees to repay the amount if it ultimately is determined that he is not
entitled to be indemnified by the corporation.
In addition, all of the Company's directors and officers are parties to
Indemnity Agreements that, among other things, require the Company to advance
expenses as they are incurred by the directors and officers upon receipt of an
undertaking similar to the one described two paragraphs above.
DISCUSSION. Due to the scope of the Ohio Law and the provisions in the existing
Indemnity Agreements, this amendment does not materially alter the Company's
existing obligations with respect to the advancement of expenses to directors
and officers. It does, however, make the Company's regulations consistent with
the Indemnity Agreements already in place.
If adopted, this amendment would be included as Article V of the 1998 Amended
Regulations.
PROPOSAL 5: INCREASE IN THE SHAREHOLDER VOTE REQUIRED TO AMEND THE FOREGOING
PROVISIONS OR CER-
36
<PAGE> 41
TAIN OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANY'S REGULATIONS FROM A MAJORITY TO 80% OF THE
OUTSTANDING SHARES
DESCRIPTION. The Company's existing regulations generally provide that the
regulations may be amended, or new regulations may be adopted, by the
shareholders at a meeting held for that purpose by the affirmative vote of the
holders of shares entitling them to exercise a majority of the voting power on
that proposal or without a meeting by the written consent of the holders of
shares entitling them to exercise two-thirds of the voting power on that
proposal. Proposal 5 would create an exception: unless the amendment is approved
and recommended by the Board of Directors, certain provisions of the regulations
may not be amended without the affirmative vote or written consent of the
holders of shares entitling them to exercise 80% of the voting power of the
Company. These provisions consist of the foregoing proposed amendments as well
as provisions relating to the classification of the Company's Board of
Directors, provisions relating to the resignation and removal of directors
(which state that a director may be removed during his or her term only for
gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his or her duties
as a director) and the filling of vacancies, and provisions relating to the
indemnification of directors and advancement of expenses.
To the extent that one or more of the proposed amendments is not approved by the
Company's shareholders, this Proposal 5 would be modified to eliminate the
reference to the provisions in the regulations corresponding to those
amendments.
DISCUSSION. The purpose of Proposal 5 is to prevent an amendment of the
Company's regulations that revokes the specified provisions and, in the context
of an unsolicited tender offer, prevents the Company from pursuing other
alternatives or undermines the Board's
37
<PAGE> 42
bargaining power. As such, Proposal 5 helps to carry out the purpose of the
other provisions.
It is possible that this proposed amendment would prevent or discourage
amendments to the Company's regulations that are supported by the holders of
more than 50% but less than 80% of the outstanding shares, but not by the
Company's Board of Directors. It is also possible that some of these amendments
might address governance concerns that are unrelated to an unsolicited tender
offer. However, on balance, the Company's Board of Directors believes that it is
in the interests of the Company and its shareholders, employees and other
constituents. A minority of shareholders holding over 20% of the Company's
Common Shares could block certain amendments to the regulations that may be
desired by a majority of shareholders. The executive officers and directors of
the Company currently beneficially own, in the aggregate, Common Shares, or
approximately % of the Common Shares outstanding.
If adopted, this amendment would be included as Article IX of the 1998 Amended
Regulations.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION; REQUIRED VOTE
The Company's Board of Directors, for the reasons set forth above, recommends
that shareholders vote in favor of each of the proposed amendments. The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the
Company is required to approve the amendments.
38
<PAGE> 43
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP has been appointed as Nordson's independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending November 1, 1998. Ernst & Young LLP or a predecessor has
served as Nordson's independent auditors since 1935. A representative of Ernst &
Young LLP is expected to be present at the meeting. The representative will be
given an opportunity to make a statement if desired and to respond to questions
regarding Ernst & Young LLP's examination of Nordson's financial statements and
records for the fiscal year ended November 2, 1997.
GENERAL
VOTING AT THE MEETING
Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 13, 1998 are entitled
to vote at the meeting. On that date, a total of Nordson Common
Shares were outstanding. Each share is entitled to one vote.
Voting for directors will be cumulative if any shareholder gives notice in
writing to the President, a Vice President, or the Secretary of Nordson at least
48 hours before the time set for the meeting and an announcement of the notice
is made at the beginning of the meeting by the Chairman or the Secretary, or by
or on behalf of the shareholder giving the notice. If cumulative voting is in
effect, Nordson's shareholders will be entitled to cast, in the election of
directors, a number of votes equal to the product of the number of directors to
be elected multiplied by the number of shares that each shareholder is voting.
Nordson's shareholders may cast all of these votes for one nominee or distribute
them among several nominees, as they see fit. If cumulative voting is in effect,
shares represented by each properly signed proxy card will also be voted on a
cumulative basis, with the votes distributed among the nominees in accordance
with the judgment of the persons named in the proxy card.
39
<PAGE> 44
Under Ohio law, directors are elected by the votes of shareholders exercising a
majority of the voting power of the corporation present at a meeting at which a
quorum is present, and proposals are adopted or approved by the vote of a
specified percentage of the voting power of the corporation. Abstentions and
broker non-votes are tabulated in determining the votes present at a meeting.
Consequently, an abstention or a broker non-vote has the same effect as a vote
against a proposal or a director nominee, as each abstention or broker non-vote
would be one less vote in favor of a proposal or for a director nominee.
If any of the nominees listed on page 2 becomes unable or declines to serve as a
director, each properly signed proxy card will be voted for another person
recommended by the Board of Directors. However, the Board has no reason to
believe that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director.
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented at the
meeting other than the election of directors and the proposals to approve the
adoption of each of the amendments to Nordson's Regulations. However, if other
matters do properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the proxy card
will vote on these matters in accordance with their best judgment.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Any shareholder who wishes to submit a proposal to be considered for inclusion
in next year's Proxy Statement should send the proposal to Nordson for receipt
on or before October 2, 1998.
Nordson will bear the expense of preparing, printing, and mailing this Notice
and Proxy Statement. In addition to requesting proxies by mail, officers and
regular employees of Nordson may request proxies by telephone or in person.
Nordson will ask custodians, nominees,
40
<PAGE> 45
and fiduciaries to send proxy material to beneficial owners in order to obtain
voting instructions.
Nordson will, upon request, reimburse them for their reasonable expenses for
mailing the proxy material.
Nordson's Annual Report to Shareholders, including financial statements for the
fiscal year ended November 2, 1997, is being mailed to shareholders of record
with this Proxy Statement.
For the Board of Directors
WILLIAM D. GINN
Secretary
January 30, 1998
41
<PAGE> 46
EXHIBIT A
NORDSON CORPORATION
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS
PROPOSAL 1 -- AMEND SECTION 2 AND SECTION 3, ARTICLE I OF THE COMPANY'S
REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 2, ARTICLE I
SECTION 2. SPECIAL MEETING. Special meetings of the shareholders of the Company
may be held on any business day when called by the President, or by a Vice
President; by the Board of Directors acting at a meeting or by a majority of the
directors acting without a meeting; or by persons who hold fifty percent of all
the shares outstanding and entitled to vote thereat. Upon request in writing
delivered either in person or by registered mail to the President or the
Secretary by any person entitled to call a special meeting of the shareholders,
that officer shall forthwith cause to be given to the shareholders entitled
thereto notice of a meeting to be held on a date not less than seven or more
than sixty days after the receipt of the request, as that officer may fix. If
the notice is not given within thirty days after the delivery or mailing of the
request, the persons calling the meeting may fix the time of the meeting and
give notice thereof in the manner provided by law or as provided in these
Regulations, or cause the notice to be given by any designated representative.
Each special meeting shall be called to convene between nine o'clock a.m. and
four o'clock p.m. and shall be held at the principal Office of the Company at
Westlake, Ohio, unless the meeting is called by the directors, acting with or
without a meeting, in which case the meeting may be held at any place either
within or without the State of Ohio determined by the Board of Directors and
specified in the notice of the meeting.
A-1
<PAGE> 47
SECTION 3, ARTICLE I
SECTION 3. NOTICE OF MEETINGS. Not less than seven or more than sixty days
before the date fixed for a meeting of the shareholders, written notice stating
the time, place, and purposes of the meeting shall be given by or at the
direction of the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, or an Assistant
Secretary (or, if notice is not timely given, by a designated representative of
the person calling the meeting under Section 2 of this Article I). The notice
shall be given by personal delivery or by mail to each shareholder entitled to
notice of the meeting who is not of record as of the date next preceding the day
on which notice is given or, if a record date therefor is duly fixed, of record
as of that date; if mailed, the notice shall be addressed to the shareholders at
their respective addresses as they appear on the records of the Company. Notice
of the time, place, and purposes of any meeting of shareholders may be waived in
writing, either before or after the holding of the meeting, by any shareholders,
which writing shall be filed with or entered upon the records of the meeting.
The attendance of any shareholder at any meeting without protesting, prior to or
at the commencement of the meeting, the lack of proper notice shall be deemed to
be a waiver by him of notice of the meeting.
PROPOSAL 2 -- AMEND SECTION 1, ARTICLE II OF THE COMPANY'S REGULATIONS TO READ
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. NUMBER AND CLASSIFICATION. The Board of Directors will be divided
into three classes consisting of not less than three directors each. The number
of directors may be fixed or changed (a) by the shareholders at any meeting of
shareholders called to elect directors at which a quorum is present, by the vote
of the holders of shares representing eighty percent of the voting power in
elections of directors, or (b) by the Board of Directors by the vote of a
majority of the directors then in office. The terms in office of the directors
in each of the classes will expire in consecutive years. At each annual election
A-2
<PAGE> 48
of directors, directors will be elected to the class whose term in office
expires in that year and will hold office for a term of three years and until
their respective successors are elected. In case of any increase in the number
of directors of any class, the additional director or directors elected to that
class will hold office for the remainder of the term in office of that class.
PROPOSAL 3 -- AMEND SECTION 7, ARTICLE I AND SECTION 3, ARTICLE II OF THE
COMPANY'S REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 7, ARTICLE I
SECTION 7. ORDER OF BUSINESS.
(a) The Chairman of the Board, or such other officer of the Company as
may be designated by the Board of Directors, will call meetings of the
shareholders to order and will preside at the meetings. The presiding
officer will determine the order of business at the meeting and have the
authority to regulate the conduct of the meeting, including (i) limiting
the persons (other than shareholders and their duly appointed proxies) who
may attend the meeting, (ii) determining whether any shareholder or his or
her proxy should be excluded from the meeting because the shareholder or
proxy has disrupted or is likely to disrupt the meeting, (iii) determining
the circumstances in which any person may make a statement or ask questions
at the meeting, and (iv) establishing such other procedures as the
presiding officer may deem appropriate for the orderly conduct of the
meeting.
(b) At an annual meeting of the shareholders, only such business as is
properly brought before the meeting will be considered. To be properly
brought before an annual meeting, business must be (i) specified in the
notice of the meeting (or any supplement to that notice) given by or at the
direc-
A-3
<PAGE> 49
tion of the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, or an Assistant
Secretary in accordance with Section 3 of this Article I, (ii) brought
before the meeting by the presiding officer or by or at the direction of
the Board of Directors, or (iii) properly requested by a shareholder to be
brought before the meeting in accordance with subsection (c) of this
Section 7.
(c) For business to be properly requested by a shareholder to be
brought before an annual meeting of the shareholders, the shareholder must
(i) be a shareholder of the Company of record at the time of the giving of
the notice for the annual meeting and at the time of the annual meeting,
(ii) be entitled to vote at the annual meeting, and (iii) have given timely
written notice of the business to the Secretary. To be timely, a
shareholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the
principal executive offices of the Company not less than 60 nor more than
90 days prior to the annual meeting; except that, if the first public
announcement of the date of the annual meeting is not made at least 70 days
prior to the date of the meeting, notice by the shareholder will be timely
if it is so received not later than the close of business on the tenth day
following the day on which the first public announcement of the date of the
meeting is made. A shareholder's notice must set forth, as to each matter
the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting, (A) a
description in reasonable detail of the business proposed to be brought
before the meeting, (B) the name and address, as they appear on the
Company's books, of the shareholder proposing such business and of the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, (C) the
class and number of shares that are owned of record and beneficially by the
shareholder proposing the business and by the beneficial owner, if any, on
whose behalf the proposal is made, and (D) any
A-4
<PAGE> 50
material interest of such shareholder or beneficial owner in such business.
This Section 7(c) will not affect any rights that the shareholder may have
pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, to request the inclusion of proposals in the Company's proxy
statement.
(d) At a special meeting of the shareholders, only such business as is
properly brought before the meeting will be conducted. To be properly
brought before a special meeting, business must be (i) specified in the
notice of the meeting (or any supplement to that notice) given by or at the
direction of the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, or an
Assistant Secretary in accordance with Section 3 of this Article I (or, if
notice is not timely given, by a designated representative of the person
calling the meeting under Section 2 of this Article I), or (ii) brought
before the meeting by the presiding officer or by or at the direction of
the Board of Directors.
(e) The determination of whether any business sought to be brought
before any annual or special meeting of the shareholders is properly
brought in accordance with this Section 7 will be made by the presiding
officer of the meeting. If the presiding officer determines that any
business is not properly brought before the meeting, he or she will so
declare to the meeting, and the business will not be considered or acted
upon.
SECTION 3, ARTICLE II
SECTION 3. NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS.
(a) At a meeting of the shareholders at which directors are to be
elected, only persons properly nominated as candidates will be eligible for
election as directors. Candidates may be properly nominated either (i) by
the Board of Directors or (ii) by
A-5
<PAGE> 51
any shareholder in accordance with subsection (b) of this Section 3.
(b) For a shareholder properly to nominate a candidate for election as
a director at a meeting of the shareholders, the shareholder must (i) be a
shareholder of the Company of record at the time of the giving of the
notice for the meeting, (ii) be entitled to vote at the meeting in the
election of directors, and (iii) have given timely written notice of the
nomination to the Secretary. To be timely, a shareholder's notice must be
delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of
the Company not less than 60 nor more than 90 days prior to the meeting;
except that, if the first public announcement of the date of the meeting is
not made at least 70 days prior to the date of the meeting, notice by the
shareholder will be timely if it is so received not later than the close of
business on the tenth day following the day on which the first public
announcement of the date of the meeting is made. A shareholder's notice
must set forth, as to each candidate, all of the information about the
candidate required to be disclosed in a proxy statement complying with the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that is used in connection
with the solicitation of proxies for the election of the candidate as a
director. If the officer presiding at the meeting determines that one or
more of the candidates has not been nominated in accordance with these
procedures, he or she will so declare at the meeting, and the candidates
will not be considered or voted upon at the meeting.
PROPOSAL 4 -- AMEND ARTICLE V OF THE COMPANY'S REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
The Company shall indemnify, to the full extent permitted or authorized by the
Ohio General Corporation Law as it may from time to time be amended, any person
made or threatened to be made a party to any
A-6
<PAGE> 52
threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative, or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or
was a director, officer, or employee of the Company, or is or was serving at the
request of the Company as a director, trustee, officer, employee, or agent of
another corporation, domestic or foreign, nonprofit or for profit, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise. The Company shall pay, to the full
extent permitted or authorized by the Ohio General Corporation Law, expenses,
including attorneys' fees, as they are incurred by any director or officer in
defending any such action, suit, or proceeding. The indemnification and
advancement of expenses provided by this Article V shall not be deemed exclusive
of any other rights to which any person seeking indemnification may be entitled
under the articles of incorporation or the regulations, or any agreement, vote
of shareholders or disinterested directors, or otherwise, both as to action in
his official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such
office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director,
officer, or employee and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and
administrators of that person.
PROPOSAL 5 -- AMEND ARTICLE IX OF THE COMPANY'S REGULATIONS TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
These Regulations may be amended, or new Regulations may be adopted, by the
shareholders at a meeting held for that purpose by the affirmative vote of the
holders of shares entitling them to exercise a majority of the voting power on
that proposal or without a meeting by the written consent of the holders of
shares entitling them to exercise two-thirds of the voting power on that
proposal; except that, unless the amendment is approved and recommended by the
Board of Directors, the provisions of Sections 2, 3, and 7 of Article I,
Sections 1, 2, and 3 of Article II, Article V, and this Article IX may not be
amended without the affirmative vote or written consent of the holders of shares
entitling them to
A-7
<PAGE> 53
exercise 80% of the voting power of the Company. If the Regulations are amended
or new Regulations are adopted without a meeting of the shareholders, the
Secretary of the Company shall mail a copy of the amendment or the new
Regulations to each shareholder who would have been entitled to vote thereon and
did not participate in the adoption thereof.
A-8
<PAGE> 54
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN
YOUR PROXY.
<PAGE> 55
NORDSON CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MARCH 12, 1998
-----------------------------------------------------------
P
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
R
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of NORDSON CORPORATION to be
O held on March 12, 1998, and at any adjournment, WILLIAM D. GINN,
DR. GLENN R. BROWN, and ERIC T. NORD, and each of them, with full
X power of substitution and resubstitution, are hereby authorized to
represent me and vote all my shares on the following matters:
Y
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
1. Election of three Directors: (change of address)
William D. Ginn, Stephen R. Hardis and William L. Robinson
2. Approval of an amendment to the Company's Regulations to increase the ------------------------------
shareholder vote required to call a special meeting of shareholders.
3. Approval of an amendment to the Company's Regulations to increase the ------------------------------
shareholder vote required to change the number of directors, and to give
the Board of Directors unlimited discretion in changing the number of ------------------------------
directors.
4. Approval of an amendment to the Company's Regulations to establish ------------------------------
procedures for the proposal of business at a shareholders meeting and (If you have written in the
to increase the notice period for the nomination of directors. space above, please mark the
5. Approval of an amendment to the Company's Regulations to require the corresponding box on the
Company to advance legal fees to directors and officers. reverse side of this Card.)
6. Approval of an amendment to the Company's Regulations to increase
the shareholder vote required to amend certain provisions of the
Company's Regulations.
7. Any other matter that may properly come before this meeting.
</TABLE>
YOU ARE ENCOURAGED TO SPECIFY YOUR CHOICES BY MARKING THE APPROPRIATE BOXES,
SEE REVERSE SIDE, BUT YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES IF YOU WISH TO VOTE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATIONS. THE PROXIES CANNOT
VOTE YOUR SHARES UNLESS YOU SIGN AND RETURN THIS CARD.
SEE REVERSE
SIDE
<PAGE> 56
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
/X/ PLEASE MARK YOUR SHARES IN YOUR NAME REINVESTMENT SHARES
VOTES AS IN THIS
EXAMPLE.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FOR WITHHELD FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. Election of 2. Increase shareholder
Directors / / / / vote required to call / / / / / /
(see reverse) special meetings of
shareholders
</TABLE>
For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):
________________________________________________________
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
3. Increase shareholder vote
required to change number of / / / / / /
directors and give Board
unlimited discretion in chang-
ing number of directors.
4. Establish procedures for pro- / / / / / /
posal of business at share-
holders meetings and
increase notice period for
nomination of directors.
5. Require Company to advance / / / / / /
legal fees to directors and
officers.
Change 6. Increase shareholder vote re- / / / / / /
of / / quired to amend certain pro-
Address visions of Company's Regulations.
7. Any other matter that may properly come before this meeting.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR
approval of each of the amendments to Nordson
Corporation's Regulations (Proposal Nos. 2
through 6). Unless otherwise specified above,
this Proxy will be voted FOR the election as
Directors of the nominees noted on the reverse
SIGNATURE(S) _______________________________________ DATE __________ side and FOR approval of each of the amend-
ments to Nordson Corporation's Regulations
(Proposal Nos. 2 through 6).
SIGNATURE(S) _______________________________________ DATE __________
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should PLEASE DATE, SIGN, AND RETURN IN THE
each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee ENCLOSED ENVELOPE -- NO POSTAGE
or guardian, please give full title as such. NECESSARY
</TABLE>
