SCIOS INC
DFAN14A, 2000-01-24
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
Previous: SCIOS INC, DFAN14A, 2000-01-24
Next: SCIOS INC, SC 13D/A, 2000-01-24




                                SCHEDULE 14A
                               (RULE 14A-101)
                          SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
 1934
                           (AMENDMENT NO.      )

 Filed by the Registrant {  }
 Filed by a Party other than the Registrant {X}

 Check the appropriate box:

 { }     Preliminary Proxy Statement
 { }     Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
         Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 { }     Definitive Proxy Statement
 {X}     Definitive Additional Materials
 { }     Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

                                 SCIOS INC.
      ----------------------------------------------------------------
              (Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

                               RANDAL J. KIRK
                                RJK, L.L.C.
                             KIRKFIELD, L.L.C.
                      THE KIRK FAMILY INVESTMENT PLAN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than Registrant)

 Payment of Filing  Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 {X}  No fee required.

 { }  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-
      11.

      (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
      (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
      (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
           pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:
      (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transactions:
      (5)  Total fee paid.

 _________
 {  } Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 {  } Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
      Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
      was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration
      statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

      (1)  Amount Previously Paid:
      (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
      (3)  Filing Party:
      (4)  Date Filed:


                               RANDAL J. KIRK
                   The Governor Tyler, 1902 Downey Street
                          Radford, Virginia 24141


                              January 24, 2000


                      VOTE TO UNLOCK STOCKHOLDER VALUE

                  VOTE FOR A NEW SCIOS BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 Dear Fellow Stockholders:

 Under the direction of the current Board of Directors, SCIOS' SHARES LOST
 59.6% IN VALUE DURING 1999 - trading as high as $12.50 per share.  On
 January 21, 2000, Scios' stock closed at $5.9375 per share.

 You will soon be receiving proxy material from Scios' management asking you
 to re-elect the incumbent Board not on what they have done for Scios but on
 their so-called 'credentials'. WHAT CREDENTIALS ARE MORE TELLING THAN THE
 DECLINE IN THE SHARE PRICE AND THEIR FAILURE TO OBTAIN FDA APPROVAL FOR
 NATRECOR?

 STOCKHOLDERS HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO BE CONCERNED.  CONSIDER THE FACTS:

 SCIOS' SHARES PLUMMETED 59.6% IN VALUE IN 1999, a year in which the Nasdaq
 Biotechnology Index soared approximately 101%.

 NEW MANAGEMENT, brought in by the Board, FAILED TO WIN FDA APPROVAL FOR
 NATRECOR, the Scios product the new management has identified as having the
 best potential for commercialization.

 THE BOARD, which, as a group, holds less than 1% of Scios' outstanding
 shares, PAID OUT TO MANAGEMENT OVER $400,000 IN SUCCESS BONUSES at year-end
 1998 only to have the Company and its stockholders adversely impacted by
 the FDA's rejection of management's Natrecor application in 1999.

 THE BOARD, once this proxy contest began, SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE
 SEVERANCE PAYMENTS OF SCIOS ' PRESIDENT AND CEO TO $1,350,000.

 SCIOS SPENT MORE THAN $350,000,000 ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT since 1987
 AND NEVER COMMERCIALIZED A SINGLE PRODUCT.


 MY GOAL IS TO UNLOCK VALUE FOR ALL STOCKHOLDERS:

 UNLIKE MANAGEMENT'S NOMINEES for the Board, I MADE A SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT
 IN SCIOS and own 2,000,000 common shares, or about 5.2% of the total common
 shares outstanding.  I bought my shares because I believe that the Company
 has excellent potential, but it has become obvious to me that this
 potential will not be realized without significant changes in how the
 Company is run.  MY GOAL IS TO REALIZE ENHANCED VALUE, BOTH NEAR- AND LONG-
 TERM FOR SCIOS STOCKHOLDERS.

 UNLIKE THE PRESENT BUSINESS APPROACH, which appears to me to be based
 primarily on the hope that the Company can get itself in position to try
 again to obtain FDA approval for Natrecor, I PROPOSE MAXIMIZING NOW THE
 VALUE OF SCIOS' PSYCHIATRIC MARKETING BUSINESS, THE VALUE OF ITS
 SUBSTANTIAL EXCESS CASH, THE VALUE OF ITS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
 ACTIVITIES, AND THE VALUE OF ITS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES.

 SPECIFICALLY, IF THE NOMINEES I AM PROPOSING TO FORM A NEW BOARD ARE
 ELECTED, SCIOS WILL PURSUE:

 1.   SEPARATING THE PSYCHIATRIC MARKETING BUSINESS FROM THE REST OF SCIOS
      IN A TAX EFFICIENT MANNER, IF LEGALLY AND OPERATIONALLY FEASIBLE.

      *    In my view, Scios' principal business of developing and marketing
           biotechnology has little, if any, connection to the Company's
           psychiatric marketing business as Scios' pipeline does not
           include any psychiatric products.

      *    The demand for contractual pharmaceutical detailing services is
           strong and is expected to remain so for several years.  This
           should mean that the psychiatric marketing business can develop a
           significant plan for growth without any further connection to the
           rest of Scios.

      *    In my view, the market currently does not sufficiently value the
           positive income streams of the Company's psychiatric marketing
           business, since these results are commingled with Scios' other
           negative results.  As a separate public company, I believe the
           Company's psychiatric marketing business can achieve an
           independent market valuation distinct from the value of Scios'
           other valuable assets.

 2.   INITIATING A $50 MILLION STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM USING THE COMPANY'S
      EXCESS CASH THROUGH ACCELERATED OPEN-MARKET PURCHASES OR A DUTCH
      AUCTION TENDER OFFER.

      *    According to the Company's recent statements, Scios currently has
           $100 million of cash-on-hand.  A significant portion of this cash
           should be made available to current stockholders to improve the
           near-term value of their investment.

      *    Because I believe strongly in the long-term potential of
           this Company, I shall not participate in the stock
           repurchase program.

 3.   ELIMINATING ALL NON-FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT THAT IS NOT
      LEGALLY COMMITTED, EXCEPT FOR NATRECOR AND OTHER PRODUCTS WHICH HAVE
      SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL FOR NEAR TERM COMMERCIAL VIABILITY.

      *    In my view, Scios is incurring significant research and
           development expenditures for projects with no apparent
           foreseeable revenue generating potential.

      *    Projects that are scientifically AND economically attractive will
           continue to receive full funding.

           I believe there are some other star performers among the research
           at Scios.  The Alzheimer's program, for example, seems to be one
           of the best research programs on Alzheimer's in the world, and it
           appears to be fully funded from external sources.  Why not expand
           this program?

      *    In my view, the best performing companies are those that bring
           traditional business and financial models to biotechnology and
           the research and development process.  I believe that Scios must
           rapidly transform itself into a profitable business dedicated to
           increasing stockholder value.

 4.   AGGRESSIVELY MARKETING SCIOS' INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES TO POSITION THE
 COMPANY TO REALIZE IMMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM REVENUES FROM PROJECTS THAT CAN
 BE SOLD OR LICENSED.

      *    A comprehensive catalog of the vast intellectual property estate
           would be developed, and we would strive to get economic value for
           stockholders from each and every item, whether through out-
           license, partnership, spin-off, or the creation of new profit
           centers within the Company.

      *    The Company's claimed licensing successes of 1999, in my view,
           are unimpressive and suggest to me more "arm-waving" than a
           genuine effort to maximize stockholder value.

 STOCKHOLDERS HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO EXPECT TO MAKE MONEY FROM THEIR SCIOS
 INVESTMENT.

 With my program in place, I am convinced the Company will still retain more
 than enough resources to pursue the development of Natrecor and the other
 aspects of the plan.

 You can determine the future of your investment in Scios.  VOTE THE WHITE
 PROXY CARD TODAY to elect a new Scios Board of Directors.  By VOTING FOR
 the candidates I have nominated, you will be putting in place a Board
 committed to carrying out a clear plan to create enhanced stockholder value
 over both the near and long term.

 Please do not send back any gold proxy card you will receive from Scios'
 incumbent Board and management, even to vote against their nominees.

 If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares, please
 call our proxy solicitor, Corporate Investor Communications, Inc., toll
 free at 877-842-2404.


                          Thank you for your support.

                          Respectfully,


                          /s/ Randal J. Kirk
                          Randal J. Kirk





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission