NORTHEAST UTILITIES
8-K, 1996-04-15
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: NORTH LILY MINING CO, 10-K, 1996-04-15
Next: CAPSURE HOLDINGS CORP, DEF 14A, 1996-04-15



                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                       WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-1004

                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

                  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                     Securities Exchange Act of 1934

    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)  April 15, 1996
                                                    -----------------
                      Commission File Number 1-5324
                                             ------


                           NORTHEAST UTILITIES
                          --------------------
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


                MASSACHUSETTS                 04-2147929
                -------------                 ----------

     (State of other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S Employer
      incorporation or organization)         Identification No.)


    174 BRUSH HILL AVENUE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 01090-0010
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
           (Address of principal executive officers)        (Zip Code)


                             (413) 785-5871
                             --------------
          (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


                             Not Applicable
                             --------------
       (Former name of former address, if changed since last report)

Item 5.  Other Events.

     On April 15, 1996, The Connecticut Light and Power Company  ("CL&P")
submitted to the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control ("DPUC")
for approval a jointly supported settlement agreement (the "Settlement")
intended to resolve numerous pending contested issues among CL&P, the DPUC
and the Office of Consumer Counsel ("OCC").  The parties to the Settlement
are CL&P, the Prosecutorial Division of the DPUC and the OCC.  The two
principal objectives of the Settlement are to provide for a 20 month
agreement as to retail rates and to resolve pending reviews of certain
nuclear outages through March 31, 1996.  The Settlement's effects on
Northeast Utilities' (NU) earnings will be felt primarily in 1996 and will
reduce those earnings by approximately $35 million, or $.17 per share. 

Connecticut Retail Rates

     The Settlement provides for an immediate 2.5 percent decrease in
customer bills to be accomplished by elimination of  $45 million in
uncollected deferred generation utilization adjustment clause ("GUAC")
charges incurred for the 1994-1995 GUAC period and outstanding as of May
1, 1996.  Pursuant to a DPUC decision issued in January 1996, CL&P has been
recovering, over an 18-month period beginning in September 1995, $83 million
of the GUAC costs for the 1994-1995 GUAC period and had appealed the denial
of recovery of an additional $19 million.   For further information on
decisions concerning GUAC deferrals, see "Business-Rates - Connecticut Retail
Rates - CL&P Adjustment Clauses" in NU's and CL&P's 1995 Form 10-K.
     
     The Settlement also provides that CL&P's base rates will be  frozen
until at least December 31, 1997, or approximately 20 months from the
earliest potential effective date of the Settlement.  The Settlement provides
that during the rate freeze, CL&P's target return on equity (ROE) will be
10.7 percent, but the Settlement does not alter CL&P's allowed ROE of 11.7
percent.  One-third of earnings above the target ROE will be refunded
to customers.  For further information on CL&P's ROE, see "Business-Rates -
Connecticut Retail Rates" in NU's and CL&P's 1994 Form 10-K.  During the
period of the rate freeze, CL&P will amortize a minimum of $200 million of
future customer liabilities, in addition to that amount estimated to be
amortized in such period absent the Settlement.   These liabilities are
referred to in the Settlement as "regulatory and strandable assets" and
consist of at least $97 million in 1996 and at least $103 million in 1997. 
These amounts may be higher (up to an additional aggregate of $39 million),
depending upon CL&P earnings.  CL&P and the DPUC may agree to extend the base
rate freeze into 1998 and beyond, in  which case additional write-offs at an
annual target rate of $117 million would occur.  Under the Settlement,
government-mandated nuclear decommissioning, conservation and cogeneration
deferrals will be amortized first, followed by certain deferred income tax
liabilities associated with CL&P's generation assets.   

     The Settlement does not affect the DPUC's ongoing  investigation of the
adoption of a fuel clause designed to track  and recover all costs of energy
incurred to serve customers, which would supersede the current GUAC and
fossil fuel adjustment clause ("FAC").  It is expected that during the
transition period from the effective date of the Settlement to the DPUC's
decision in the energy clause proceeding (expected in June 1996), the net
effect of the FAC, the GUAC and a transitional deferred fuel accounting
mechanism provided for in the Settlement will be as though CL&P has a fully-
tracking fuel clause.  However, the Settlement provides that if the DPUC
takes any action in the energy clause docket which increases CL&P's risk of
non-recovery of fuel expenses or which could reduce earnings that would have
been used to accelerate the amortization of regulatory assets, CL&P has a
one-time opportunity to withdraw from its future obligations under the
Settlement and to cease mitigation of regulatory assets within 60 days.  In
such event, which CL&P does not anticipate will occur, the base rate freeze
would also end. 

     Additionally, under the proposed Settlement, all litigation  among the
parties that potentially could affect CL&P's rates,  including the CL&P and
OCC appeals from CL&P's 1993 rate case  decision, appeals of the decisions
concerning the 1992-1993 and  1993-1994 GUAC periods and OCC's appeal of the
DPUC guidelines  adopted in 1995 allowing additional flexibility in
negotiating  special rates with electric customers, will be terminated.  For 
further information on these proceedings, see "Business-Rates - Connecticut
Retail Rates," "Business - Nuclear Generation" and "Legal Proceedings" in
NU's and CL&P's 1995 Form 10-K.

Nuclear Performance Issues

     The second feature of the Settlement is to resolve the issue of the
recovery of costs incurred prior to March 31, 1996   associated with nuclear
outages.  In the Settlement, CL&P has  agreed not to seek recovery from its
customers of approximately  $115 million in uncollected costs incurred in
connection with  outages prior to March 31, 1996.  In addition, the
Settlement calls for an end to all pending nuclear operating prudence review
proceedings over which litigation has been ongoing.  For further  information
on the DPUC's investigations into the prudence of  certain costs associated
with outages at various nuclear units  located in Connecticut, see "Business-
Rates - Connecticut Retail Rates" and "Business-Electric Operations - Nuclear
Generation" in NU's and CL&P's 1995 Form 10-K.

     CL&P has also agreed not to seek recovery for approximately  $20 million
of unrecovered costs associated with its nuclear  performance enhancement
program ("PEP") initiated in 1992, which  amount is included with the $115
million discussed above, and for incremental Nuclear Regulatory Commission
("NRC") billings resulting from the placement of Millstone Station on the
NRC's "watch list" in late  January 1996.  For information on the recent NRC
actions in  connection with Millstone Station, see "Part II - Other 
Information" in NU's and CL&P's Current Reports on Form 8-K dated March 30,
1996 and for information on PEP, see "Business - Electric Operations -
Nuclear Generation" in NU's and CL&P's 1994 Form 10-K.

     NU is continuing to evaluate the ongoing costs of replacement power and
other direct costs incurred in connection with the NRC's heightened scrutiny
of Millstone Station and the DPUC's authority over the recovery of such costs
is unaffected by the Settlement.  While it is too early to estimate the total
amount of replacement power and other costs that will result from the
Millstone outages, management believes that there is a significant exposure
to non-recovery of a material amount of the total costs.
  
Other Issues

     The Settlement does not affect the DPUC's statutory four year review of
CL&P's rates that is expected to occur in the second half of 1997, but such
review, should it occur, is unlikely to materially affect CL&P's rates in
1997.  Furthermore, issues to be addressed by the DPUC in future
restructuring proceedings regarding competition and retail wheeling are not
affected by the Settlement.  For further information on competition and cost
recovery in CL&P's retail service area, see  "Business - Competition and
Marketing" and "Business - Rates - Connecticut Retail Rates" in NU's and
CL&P's 1995 Form 10-K.  




                             SIGNATURE


 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.




                          NORTHEAST UTILITIES
                          -------------------
                              Registrant




Date  April 15, 1996         By    /s/ John B. Keane
     ------------------          ------------------------------------
                                   John B. Keane
                                   Vice President and Treasurer





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission