<PAGE>
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 6, 1995
REGISTRATION NO. 33-62451
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
FORM S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------
U S WEST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
COLORADO 84-0926774
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
</TABLE>
7800 EAST ORCHARD ROAD
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111
(303) 793-6500
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)
------------------------
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
STEPHEN E. BRILZ, ESQ. PLEASE SEND COPIES OF ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO:
U S WEST, INC. DENNIS J. BLOCK, ESQ.
7800 EAST ORCHARD ROAD WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 767 FIFTH AVENUE
(303) 793-6626 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10153
(Name, address, including zip code, and (212) 310-8000
telephone number
of agent for service for the registrant)
</TABLE>
------------------------
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time
to time after the effective date of the Registration Statement, as determined by
market conditions.
------------------------
If the only securities being registered on this Form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following
box. / /
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, please check the following box. /X/
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. / / __________
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. / / __________
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. / /
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A),
MAY DETERMINE.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY
OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES
EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES
IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR
TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY SUCH STATE.
<PAGE>
Subject to Completion
October 6, 1995
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT [LOGO]
(To Prospectus Dated October , 1995)
4,900,000 DECS-SM-
(DEBT EXCHANGEABLE FOR COMMON STOCK-SM-)
U S WEST, INC.
% EXCHANGEABLE NOTES DUE , 1998
(SUBJECT TO EXCHANGE INTO SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.10 PER SHARE, OF
ENHANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC.)
The principal amount of each of the % Exchangeable Notes Due ,
1998 (each, a "DECS"), of U S WEST, Inc. ("U S WEST") being offered hereby will
be $ (the last sale price of the common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the
"Enhance Common Stock"), of Enhance Financial Services Group Inc. ("Enhance") on
, 1995, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape) (the
"Initial Price"). The DECS will mature on , 1998. Interest on the
DECS, at the rate of % of the principal amount per annum, is payable
quarterly on , , and , beginning
, 1995. DECS are not subject to redemption or any sinking fund prior
to maturity.
At maturity (including as a result of acceleration or otherwise), the principal
amount of each DECS will be mandatorily exchanged by U S WEST into a number of
shares of Enhance Common Stock (or, at U S WEST's option, the cash equivalent)
at the Exchange Rate (as defined herein). The Exchange Rate is equal to, subject
to certain adjustments, (a) if the Maturity Price per share of Enhance Common
Stock is greater than or equal to $ per share of Enhance Common Stock,
shares of Enhance Common Stock per DECS, (b) if the Maturity Price is less than
$ but is greater than the Initial Price, a fractional share of Enhance
Common Stock per DECS so that the value thereof at the Maturity Price equals the
Initial Price and (c) if the Maturity Price is less than or equal to the Initial
Price, one share of Enhance Common Stock per DECS. The "Maturity Price" means
the average Closing Price (as defined herein) per share of Enhance Common Stock
on the 20 Trading Days (as defined herein) immediately prior to maturity, except
as otherwise described herein. Accordingly, the value of the Enhance Common
Stock to be received by holders of the DECS (or the cash equivalent) at maturity
will not necessarily equal the principal amount thereof. The DECS will be
unsecured obligations of U S WEST ranking pari passu with all of its other
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. Enhance will have no obligations with
respect to the DECS. See "Description of the DECS."
SEE "RISK FACTORS RELATING TO DECS" BEGINNING ON PAGE S-3 FOR A DISCUSSION OF
CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED BY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS.
Attached hereto as Appendix A and included as part of this Prospectus Supplement
is a prospectus of Enhance relating to the shares of Enhance Common Stock that
may be received by holders of DECS at maturity. The Enhance Common Stock is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "EFS".
For a discussion of certain United States federal income tax consequences for
holders of DECS, see "Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations."
"DECS" and "Debt Exchangeable for Common Stock" are service marks of Salomon
Brothers Inc.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR THE ACCOMPANYING
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PRICE TO UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO
PUBLIC(1) DISCOUNT U S WEST(1)(2)
Per DECS.................................. $ $ $
Total (3)................................. $ $ $
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<FN>
(1) Plus accrued interest, if any, from , 1995 to the date of
delivery.
(2) Before deducting expenses payable by U S WEST, estimated to be $ .
(3) U S WEST has granted the Underwriter an option, exercisable within 30 days
from the date hereof, to purchase up to an additional DECS at the Price
to Public, less the Underwriting Discount, for the purpose of covering
over-allotments, if any. If the Underwriter exercises such option in full,
the total price to Public, Underwriting Discount, and Proceeds to U S WEST
will be $ , $ and $ , respectively. See "Plan of
Distribution."
</TABLE>
The DECS are offered subject to receipt and acceptance by the Underwriter, to
prior sales and to the Underwriter's right to reject any order in whole or in
part and to withdraw, cancel or modify the offer without notice. It is expected
that delivery of the DECS will be made at the office of Salomon Brothers Inc,
Seven World Trade Center, New York, New York, or through the facilities of The
Depository Trust Company, on or about , 1995.
- --------------------------------------------
SALOMON BROTHERS INC
- ------------------------------------------------------------
The date of this Prospectus Supplement is , 1995.
<PAGE>
IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITER MAY OVER-ALLOT OR EFFECT
TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE DECS AND THE
ENHANCE COMMON STOCK AT LEVELS ABOVE THOSE WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE
OPEN MARKET. SUCH TRANSACTIONS MAY BE EFFECTED ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
(WITH RESPECT TO THE ENHANCE COMMON STOCK) IN THE OVER-THE- COUNTER MARKET OR
OTHERWISE. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME.
S-2
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO DECS
As described in more detail below, the trading price of the DECS may vary
considerably prior to maturity (including by acceleration or otherwise,
"Maturity") due to, among other things, fluctuations in the market price of
Enhance Common Stock and other events that are difficult to predict and beyond U
S WEST's control.
COMPARISON TO OTHER DEBT SECURITIES; RELATIONSHIP TO ENHANCE COMMON STOCK
The terms of the DECS differ from those of ordinary debt securities in that
the value of the Enhance Common Stock (or cash equivalent thereof) that a holder
of the DECS will receive upon mandatory exchange of the principal amount thereof
at Maturity (the "Amount Receivable at Maturity") is not fixed, but is based on
the market price of the Enhance Common Stock as specified in the Exchange Rate
(as defined under "Description of the DECS"). There can be no assurance that the
Amount Receivable at Maturity will be equal to or greater than the principal
amount of the DECS. For example, if the Maturity Price of the Enhance Common
Stock is less than the Initial Price, the Amount Receivable at Maturity will be
less than the principal amount paid for the DECS, in which case an investment in
DECS would result in a loss.
In addition, the opportunity for equity appreciation afforded by an
investment in the DECS is less than the opportunity for equity appreciation
afforded by an investment in Enhance Common Stock because the Amount Receivable
at Maturity will only exceed the principal amount of such DECS if the Maturity
Price exceeds the Threshold Appreciation Price (as defined under "Description of
the DECS"), which represents an appreciation of % of the Initial Price.
Moreover, holders of the DECS will only be entitled to receive upon exchange at
Maturity % of any appreciation of the value of Enhance Common Stock in excess
of the Threshold Appreciation Price. Because the market price of the Enhance
Common Stock is subject to market fluctuations, the Amount Receivable at
Maturity may be more or less than the principal amount of the DECS.
It is impossible to predict whether the price of Enhance Common Stock will
rise or fall. Trading prices of Enhance Common Stock will be influenced by
Enhance's operational results and by complex and interrelated political,
economic, financial and other factors that can affect the capital markets
generally, the stock exchange on which Enhance Common Stock is traded and the
market segment of which Enhance is a part. See the prospectus relating to
Enhance and to Enhance Common Stock attached hereto as Appendix A and included
as part of this Prospectus Supplement. Trading prices of Enhance Common Stock
also may be influenced if U S WEST or another principal shareholder of Enhance
hereafter issues securities with terms similar to those of the DECS or otherwise
transfers shares of Enhance Common Stock. As of the date hereof, an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of U S WEST held an aggregate of 5,430,800 shares of
Enhance Common Stock, 4,900,000 shares of which (5,430,800 shares if the
Underwriter's over-allotment option is exercised in full) U S WEST may deliver
to holders of the DECS at Maturity.
DILUTION OF ENHANCE COMMON STOCK
The Amount Receivable at Maturity is subject to adjustment for certain
events arising from stock splits and combinations, stock dividends and certain
other actions of Enhance that modify its capital structure. See "Description of
the DECS -- Dilution Adjustments; Reorganization Events." Such Amount Receivable
at Maturity may not be adjusted for other events, such as offerings of Enhance
Common Stock for cash or in connection with acquisitions, that may adversely
affect the price of Enhance Common Stock and, because of the relationship of
such Amount Receivable at Maturity to the price of Enhance Common Stock, such
other events may adversely affect the trading price of the DECS. There can be no
assurance that Enhance will not make offerings of Enhance Common Stock or take
such other action in the future or as to the amount of such offerings, if any.
In addition, until such time, if any, as U S WEST shall deliver shares of
Enhance Common Stock to holders of the DECS at Maturity thereof, holders of the
DECS will not be entitled to any rights with respect to Enhance Common Stock
(including, without limitation, voting rights and the rights to receive any
dividends or other distributions in respect thereof).
S-3
<PAGE>
NO OBLIGATION ON THE PART OF ENHANCE WITH RESPECT TO THE DECS
Enhance has no obligations with respect to the DECS or the Amount Receivable
at Maturity, including any obligation to take the needs of U S WEST or of
holders of the DECS into consideration for any reason. Enhance will not receive
any of the proceeds of the offering of the DECS made hereby and is not
responsible for, and has not participated in, the determination of the time of,
prices for or quantities of DECS to be issued or the determination or
calculation of the Amount Receivable at Maturity. Enhance is not involved with
the administration or trading of the DECS and has no obligations with respect to
the Amount Receivable at Maturity.
POSSIBLE ILLIQUIDITY OF THE SECONDARY MARKET
It is not possible to predict how the DECS will trade in the secondary
market or whether such market will be liquid or illiquid. DECS are novel and
innovative securities and there is currently no secondary market for the DECS.
The DECs will not be listed or traded on any securities exchange or trading
market. Accordingly, pricing information for the DECS may be difficult to obtain
and the liquidity of the DECS may be limited. The Underwriter currently intends,
but is not obligated, to make a market in the DECS. There can be no assurance
that a secondary market will develop or, if a secondary market does develop,
that it will provide the holders of the DECS with liquidity or that it will
continue for the life of the DECS.
S-4
<PAGE>
U S WEST, INC.
U S WEST is a diversified global communications company engaged in the
telecommunications, cable, wireless communications and multimedia content and
services businesses. U S WEST conducts its businesses through two groups: the U
S WEST Communications Group (the "Communications Group") and the U S WEST Media
Group (the "Media Group").
The Communications Group provides telecommunications services to more than
25 million residential and business customers in the states of Arizona,
Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota,
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming (collectively, the
"Communications Group Region"). Such services include local telephone services,
exchange access services and certain long distance services, as well as various
new services, including Caller ID, voice messaging and high-speed data
networking services. The Communications Group also provides customer premise
equipment and certain communications services to business customers and
governmental agencies both inside and outside the Communications Group Region.
The Media Group is comprised of (i) cable and telecommunications network
businesses outside the Communications Group Region and internationally, (ii)
domestic and international wireless communications network businesses and (iii)
domestic and international multimedia content and services businesses. The Media
Group's cable and telecommunications businesses include domestic cable and
telecommunications businesses and investments outside of the Communications
Group Region, including U S WEST's cable systems in the Atlanta, Georgia
metropolitan area and its interest in Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.,
and international cable and telecommunications investments, including U S WEST's
interest in TeleWest plc, the largest provider of combined cable and
telecommunications services in the United Kingdom. The Media Group provides
domestic wireless communications products and services, including cellular
services, to a rapidly growing customer base. U S WEST and AirTouch
Communications, Inc. have announced plans to combine their domestic cellular
properties and create the third largest cellular company in the United States.
The Media Group also provides wireless communications services internationally
through Mercury One-2-One, the world's first Personal Communications Service, in
the United Kingdom. The Media Group's multimedia content and services businesses
develop and package content and information services, including telephone
directories, database marketing and other interactive services in domestic and
international markets. The Media Group also includes the businesses of U S
WEST's capital assets segment, including U S WEST's interest in Enhance.
U S WEST has announced a plan (the "Recapitalization Plan") to create two
classes of common stock that are intended to reflect separately the performance
of the Communications Group and the Media Group and to change the state of
incorporation of U S WEST from Colorado to Delaware. The Recapitalization Plan
will be effected in accordance with the terms of an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated August 17, 1995, between U S WEST and U S WEST, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("U S WEST Delaware") and wholly-owned subsidiary of U S WEST,
pursuant to which (i) U S WEST will be merged with and into U S WEST Delaware,
with U S WEST Delaware continuing as the surviving corporation and (ii) each
outstanding share of Common Stock, without par value, of U S WEST will be
converted into one share of U S WEST Communications Group Common Stock, par
value $.01 per share, of U S WEST Delaware, which is intended to reflect
separately the performance of the Communications Group, and one share of U S
WEST Media Group Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of U S WEST Delaware,
which is intended to reflect separately the performance of the Media Group.
The Recapitalization Plan will require the approval of U S WEST's
shareholders. U S WEST plans to seek such approval at a special meeting of
shareholders to be held on October 31, 1995. The Recapitalization Plan will not
affect the offer and sale by U S WEST of the DECS. In addition, the
Recapitalization Plan will not result in the transfer of any assets from U S
WEST or any of its subsidiaries or alter the legal nature of U S WEST's
obligations to its creditors, including its obligations under the DECS.
Creditors of
S-5
<PAGE>
U S WEST, including the holders of the DECS, will continue to benefit from the
cash flow of the subsidiaries comprising both the Communications Group and the
Media Group, subject to the satisfaction of obligations by such subsidiaries.
The Recapitalization Plan is not expected to have any adverse impact on U S
WEST's credit rating. However, as part of its growth strategy, U S WEST from
time to time engages in discussions regarding acquisitions. U S WEST may fund
any such acquisitions, if consummated, with internally generated funds, debt or
equity. The incurrence of indebtedness to fund such acquisitions and/or the
assumption of indebtedness in connection with such acquisitions could result in
a downgrading of U S WEST's credit rating and, as a result, have an adverse
effect upon the market value of the DECS.
ENHANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC.
Enhance is principally engaged, through its subsidiaries, in the reinsurance
of financial guaranties of municipal and asset-backed debt obligations of
monoline financial guaranty insurers. In addition, Enhance is engaged in the
insurance and reinsurance of various specialty lines of business that utilize
Enhance's expertise in performing sophisticated analyses of complex,
credit-based risks. Enhance expects that a significant portion of its growth
will come from its expanding specialty businesses.
Monoline financial guaranty insurers guaranty to the holders of debt
obligations, primarily those issued by municipalities, the full and timely
payment of principal and interest. In conducting its reinsurance business,
Enhance assumes a portion of the risk insured, and receives a portion of the
premium collected, by the primary insurer. Reinsurance of financial guaranties
issued by monoline financial guaranty insurers represented 68.7% and 55.8% of
Enhance's gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 1994 and the
six months ended June 30, 1995, respectively. During the year ended December 31,
1994, Enhance received 35.5% of the total reinsurance premiums ceded by all
monoline financial guaranty insurers.
Enhance's specialty businesses currently involve the issuance of direct
financial guaranties of smaller municipal and multi-family housing-backed debt
obligations, trade credit insurance, financial responsibility bonds and
excess-SIPC bonds. This area of Enhance's business, measured by gross premiums
written, has grown from its inception in 1991 to represent over 44% of Enhance's
gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 1995. Enhance is
continuing to expand these businesses and is diversifying its products and
services into other areas that Enhance believes have strong growth potential and
in which Enhance's strength in credit analysis can provide a competitive
advantage.
Enhance's business strategy is to concentrate its efforts on the maintenance
and growth of its financial guaranty business, both primary and reinsurance,
while maintaining its commitment to intensive and prudent credit underwriting
and conservative investment policies; to utilize its expertise in underwriting
credit risks to expand and develop its specialty businesses; and to accelerate
its diversification effort into other areas that Enhance believes have strong
profit and growth potential.
Enhance's aggregate insurance in force as of June 30, 1995 was $52.3
billion, of which $37.2 billion, or 71.1%, was attributable to reinsurance of
municipal bond obligations; $9.6 billion, or 18.4%, was attributable to
reinsurance of asset-backed debt obligations; and $5.5 billion, or 10.5%, was
attributable to specialty businesses.
For additional information about Enhance, see the Enhance Prospectus
attached hereto as Appendix A. A copy of Enhance's 1994 Annual Report to
Stockholders and 1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K can be obtained by writing to
the Secretary of Enhance, Enhance Financial Services Group Inc., 335 Madison
Avenue, New York, New York 10017 (telephone number (212) 983-3100).
S-6
<PAGE>
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN U S WEST AND ENHANCE
An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of U S WEST currently owns approximately
31.5% (5,430,800 shares) of the outstanding Enhance Common Stock and two of the
directors of Enhance are officers of U S WEST or its affiliates. Enhance is
operated as a corporation independent from U S WEST, and while U S WEST may have
some influence over Enhance, U S WEST does not consider that its ownership of
Enhance Common Stock affords it the power to control the management of Enhance.
Moreover, because U S WEST is not required to retain its current holdings of
shares of Enhance Common Stock in connection with the DECS or otherwise and may
sell some or all of such shares from time to time, there can be no assurance
that U S WEST will continue to have any influence over the actions and decisions
taken and made by Enhance. In connection with the offering of the DECS, Enhance
has agreed to indemnify U S WEST against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
and to pay the expenses of U S WEST incurred in connection therewith. For a
description of certain agreements between U S WEST and Enhance, see "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Enhance Prospectus attached
hereto as Appendix A. Enhance has no obligations with respect to the DECS. See
"Risk Factors Relating to DECS -- No Obligation on the Part of Enhance with
Respect to the DECS."
S-7
<PAGE>
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the unaudited consolidated capitalization of
U S WEST at June 30, 1995, and as adjusted to reflect the application of the
estimated net proceeds from the sale of the DECS (assuming the Underwriters'
over-allotment option is not exercised) and the sale of certain securities by U
S WEST and its affiliates subsequent to June 30, 1995. See "Use of Proceeds."
The table should be read in conjunction with U S WEST's consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the documents incorporated by reference
herein. See "Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference" in the
accompanying Prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT JUNE 30, 1995
--------------------------
ACTUAL (1) AS ADJUSTED (1)
------- -----------------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
Short-term borrowings........................................ $4,364 $ (2)
------- --------
------- --------
Long-term borrowings:
Debentures, notes and other................................ $4,626 $ (2)
DECS....................................................... --
------- --------
Total long-term borrowings................................... $4,626 $ (2)
------- --------
Guaranteed minority interest in trust holding subordinated
debentures of subsidiary.................................... $ -- $
------- --------
Preferred stock subject to mandatory redemption.............. $ 51 $
------- --------
Common shareholders' equity:
Common shares -- no par, 2,000,000,000 authorized;
470,722,738 outstanding................................. $8,123 $
Cumulative deficit....................................... (282 )
LESOP guarantee.......................................... (157 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment.................. (5 )
------- --------
Total common shareholders' equity............................ $7,679 $ (3)
------- --------
Total capitalization......................................... $12,356 $ (2)(3)
------- --------
------- --------
<FN>
- ------------------------
(1) Does not give effect to the shares of common stock, without par value, of U
S WEST ("Common Stock"), that may be issued upon exercise of options to
purchase 2,021,149 shares of Common Stock that were exercisable at June 30,
1995 under U S WEST's stock option plans or upon conversion of U S WEST's
Liquid Yield Option Notes due 2011 ("LYONs") into up to 9,633,826 shares of
Common Stock (based on the number of options and LYONs outstanding June 30,
1995).
(2) Gives effect to (i) the issuance by an affiliate of U S WEST on September
11, 1995 of $600 million of 7.96% Trust Originated Preferred Securities
(the "Preferred Securities"), (ii) the issuance by U S WEST Communications,
Inc. on September 15, 1995 of $250 million of 6 5/8% Notes Due 2005 and
$250 million of 7 1/4% Debentures Due 2025 and (iii) the issuance by U S
WEST Capital Funding,Inc. on October 6, 1995 of $300 million of 6 3/4%
Notes Due October 1, 2005, and the application of the net proceeds thereof
to the reduction of short-term borrowings. The Preferred Securities will be
shown on U S WEST's consolidated financial statements as a guaranteed
minority interest in trust holding subordinated debentures of a subsidiary.
(3) The Recapitalization Plan, if implemented, will not affect the total common
shareholders' equity or the total capitalization of U S WEST.
</TABLE>
S-8
<PAGE>
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
The summary financial data below should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes thereto included in U S WEST's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 and Form 10-Q for the three
months ended June 30, 1995. See "Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference" in the accompanying Prospectus. The summary financial data at
December 31, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 and 1994 and for each of the five years
ended December 31, 1994 are derived from the consolidated financial statements
of U S WEST which have been audited by Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent
certified public accountants. See "Experts" in the accompanying Prospectus. The
summary financial data at June 30, 1994 and 1995 and for the six months ended
June 30, 1995 and 1994 are derived from the unaudited consolidated financial
statements of U S WEST, which have been prepared on the same basis as U S WEST's
audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management,
contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of
operations for these periods.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1994 1995
--------- -------- -------- ------- --------- --------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL DATA
Sales and other revenues..................... $ 9,369 $ 9,528 $ 9,823 $10,294 $10,953 $5,349 $5,722
Income from continuing operations (1)........ 1,145 840 1,076 476 1,426 699 648
Net income (loss) (2)........................ 1,199 553 (614) (2,806) 1,426 699 648
Total assets................................. $ 22,160 $ 23,375 $ 23,461 $20,680 $23,204 $21,193 $24,193
Total debt (3)............................... 5,147 5,969 5,430 7,199 7,938 7,231 8,990
Shareholders' equity......................... 9,240 9,587 8,268 5,861 7,382 6,597 7,679
Earnings per common share (continuing
operations) (1)............................. 2.97 2.09 2.61 1.13 3.14 1.56 1.37
Earnings (loss) per common share............. 3.11 1.38 (1.49) (6.69) 3.14 1.56 1.37
Return on common shareholders' equity (4).... 13.7% 5.7% 14.4% -- 21.6% 22.1% 17.0%
Percentage of debt to total capital (3)...... 35.8% 38.4% 39.6% 55.1% 51.8% 52.3% 53.9%
Capital expenditures (3)..................... $ 2,217 $ 2,425 $ 2,554 $ 2,441 $2,820 $1,227 $1,365
OPERATING DATA
EBITDA (5)................................... $ 3,889 $ 3,920 $ 3,963 $ 4,228 $4,559 $2,287 $2,451
Telephone network access lines in service
(thousands)................................. 12,562 12,935 13,345 13,843 14,336 14,009 14,518
Billed access minutes of use (millions)...... 38,832 41,701 44,369 48,123 52,275 25,630 28,058
Cellular subscribers......................... 219,000 300,000 415,000 601,000 968,000 738,000 1,165,000
Cable television basic subscribers served.... -- -- -- -- 486,000 473,000 509,000
Employees.................................... 65,469 65,829 63,707 60,778 61,505 61,320 61,448
Number of common shareholders................ 935,530 899,082 867,773 836,328 816,099 831,620 798,009
Weighted average common shares outstanding
(thousands)................................. 386,012 401,332 412,518 419,365 453,316 449,024 469,490
- ------------------------------
(1) 1993 income from continuing operations was reduced by a restructuring
charge of $610 ($1.46 per share) and $54 ($.13 per share) for the
cumulative effect on deferred taxes of the 1993 federally mandated increase
in income tax rates. 1991 income from continuing operations was reduced by
a restructuring charge of $230 ($.57 per share). 1994 income from
continuing operations includes a gain of $105 ($.23 per share) on the sale
of 24.4 percent of U S WEST's joint venture interest in cable
television/telephone operations in the United Kingdom (TeleWest
Communications plc), a gain of $41 ($.09 per share) on the sale of U S
WEST's paging unit and a gain of $51 ($.11 per share) on the sales of
certain rural telephone exchanges. 1995 first six months income includes a
gain of $49 ($.10 per share) on the sales of rural telephone exchanges.
1994 first six months income includes a gain of $31 ($.07 per share) on the
sales of rural telephone exchanges and a gain of $41 ($.09 per share) on
the sale of U S WEST's paging unit.
(2) 1992 income includes a charge of $1,793 ($4.35 per share) for the
cumulative effect of change in accounting principles. 1993 net income was
reduced by extraordinary charges of $3,123 ($7.45 per share) for the
discontinuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
71 and $77 ($.18 per share) for the early extinguishment of debt. 1993 net
income also includes a charge of $120 ($.28 per share) for U S WEST's
decision to discontinue the operations of its capital assets segment.
Discontinued operations provided net income (loss) of $54 ($.14 per share),
$(287) ($.71 per share), $103 ($.25 per share) and $38 ($.09 per share) in
1990, 1991, 1992 and 1993, respectively.
(3) Capital expenditures, debt and the percentage of debt to total capital
exclude discontinued operations.
(4) 1992 return on shareholders' equity is based on income before the
cumulative effect of change in accounting principles. 1993 return on
shareholders' equity is not presented. Return on shareholders' equity for
fourth quarter 1993 was 19.9 percent based on income from continuing
operations.
(5) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA").
EBITDA excludes gains on sales of assets, restructuring charges and other
income. U S WEST considers EBITDA an important indicator of the operational
strength and performance of its businesses. EBITDA, however, should not be
considered as an alternative to operating or net income as an indicator of
the performance of U S WEST's businesses or as an alternative to cash flows
from operating activities as a measure of liquidity, in each case
determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
</TABLE>
S-9
<PAGE>
PRICE RANGE AND DIVIDEND HISTORY
OF ENHANCE COMMON STOCK
Enhance Common Stock has been traded on the NYSE under the symbol "EFS"
since March 1992. The following table sets forth, the high and low sales prices
for the Enhance Common Stock for the calendar quarters indicated as reported on
the NYSE consolidated transaction system.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SALES PRICES
-------------------- DIVIDENDS
HIGH LOW PAID
--------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1993
First Quarter..................................................................... $ 24 7/8 $ 17 1/2 $ 0.07
Second Quarter.................................................................... 23 5/8 19 1/2 0.07
Third Quarter..................................................................... 23 1/2 17 3/4 0.07
Fourth Quarter.................................................................... 22 18 3/4 0.07
1994
First Quarter..................................................................... $ 19 7/8 $ 18 1/8 $ 0.08
Second Quarter.................................................................... 19 3/8 17 3/8 0.08
Third Quarter..................................................................... 20 5/8 17 3/4 0.08
Fourth Quarter.................................................................... 19 3/8 15 1/2 0.08
1995
First Quarter..................................................................... $ 18 3/8 $ 15 7/8 $ 0.09
Second Quarter.................................................................... 19 5/8 16 1/4 0.09
Third Quarter..................................................................... 20 5/8 18 0.09
Fourth Quarter (through October 5, 1995).......................................... 20 3/4 20 1/4
</TABLE>
As of September 30, 1995, there were 135 holders of record of Enhance Common
Stock and 17,235,625 shares of Enhance Common Stock outstanding.
For a recent sales price of the Enhance Common Stock, see the cover page of
this Prospectus Supplement. See also "Price Range of Common Stock and Dividends"
in the Enhance Prospectus attached hereto as Appendix A.
U S WEST makes no representation as to the amount of dividends, if any, that
Enhance will pay in the future. In any event, holders of the DECS will not be
entitled to receive any dividends that may be payable on the Enhance Common
Stock until such time as U S WEST, if it so elects, delivers Enhance Common
Stock at Maturity of the DECS, and then only with respect to dividends having a
record date on or after the date of delivery of such Enhance Common Stock. See
"Description of the DECS."
USE OF PROCEEDS
The net proceeds to be received by U S WEST from sales of the DECS will be
used for general corporate purposes, including the reduction of short-term and
long-term borrowings and other business opportunities.
S-10
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF THE DECS
The following description of the particular terms of the DECS supplements,
and to the extent inconsistent therewith replaces, the description of the
general terms and provisions of Debt Securities set forth in the Prospectus, to
which description reference is hereby made.
GENERAL
The DECS are a series of Debt Securities (as defined in the Prospectus), to
be issued under an indenture dated as of , 1995, as supplemented by
the First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of , 1995 (the indenture
dated as of , 1995, as supplemented from time to time, the
"Indenture"), between U S WEST and The First National Bank of Chicago, as
Trustee (the "Trustee").
The DECS will be unsecured and will rank on a parity with all other
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of U S WEST. The aggregate number of
DECS to be issued will be 4,900,000 plus such additional number of DECS as may
be issued pursuant to the over-allotment option granted by U S WEST to the
Underwriter (see "Plan of Distribution"). The DECS will mature on ,
1998. In the future U S WEST may issue additional Debt Securities or other
securities with terms similar to those of the DECS.
Each DECS, which will be issued with a principal amount of $ , will
bear interest at the annual rate of % of the principal amount per annum (or
$ per annum) from , 1995, or from the most recent Interest
Payment Date (as defined below) to which interest has been paid or provided for
until the principal amount thereof is exchanged at Maturity pursuant to the
terms of the DECS. Interest on the DECS will be payable quarterly in arrears on
, , and , commencing , 1995
(each, an "Interest Payment Date"), to the persons in whose names the DECS are
registered at the close of business on the day of the calendar month
immediately preceding such Interest Payment Date, provided that interest payable
at Maturity shall be payable to the person to whom the principal is payable.
Interest on the DECS will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve
30-day months. If an Interest Payment Date falls on a day that is not a Business
Day (as defined below), the interest payment to be made on such Interest Payment
Date will be made on the next succeeding Business Day with the same force and
effect as if made on such Interest Payment Date, and no additional interest will
accrue as a result of such delayed payment.
At Maturity (including as a result of acceleration or otherwise), the
principal amount of each DECS will be mandatorily exchanged by U S WEST into a
number of shares of Enhance Common Stock at the Exchange Rate (as defined
below). The "Exchange Rate" is equal to, (a) if the Maturity Price (as defined
below) per share of Enhance Common Stock is greater than or equal to $ per
share of Enhance Common Stock (the "Threshold Appreciation Price"), shares
of Enhance Common Stock per DECS, (b) if the Maturity Price is less than the
Threshold Appreciation Price but is greater than the Initial Price, a fractional
share of Enhance Common Stock per DECS so that the value thereof (determined at
the Maturity Price) is equal to the Initial Price and (c) if the Maturity Price
is less than or equal to the Initial Price, one share of Enhance Common Stock
per DECS. ACCORDINGLY, THE VALUE OF THE ENHANCE COMMON STOCK TO BE RECEIVED BY
HOLDERS OF THE DECS (OR, AS DISCUSSED BELOW, THE CASH EQUIVALENT TO BE RECEIVED
IN LIEU OF SUCH SHARES) AT MATURITY WILL NOT NECESSARILY EQUAL THE PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT OF SUCH DECS. The numbers of shares of Enhance Common Stock per DECS
specified in clauses (a) and (c) above of the Exchange Rate definition are
hereinafter referred to as the "Share Components". Any shares of Enhance Common
Stock delivered by U S WEST to the holders of the DECS that are not affiliated
with Enhance shall be free of any transfer restrictions and the holders of the
DECS will be responsible for the payment of any and all brokerage costs upon the
subsequent sale of such shares. No fractional shares of Enhance Common Stock
will be issued at Maturity as provided under "-- Fractional Shares" below.
Although it is U S WEST's current intention to deliver shares of Enhance Common
Stock at maturity, U S WEST may at its option, in lieu of delivering such shares
of Enhance Common Stock, deliver cash in an amount equal to the product of the
number of shares of Enhance Common Stock otherwise deliverable on the date of
S-11
<PAGE>
Maturity multiplied by the Maturity Price. In the event U S WEST elects to
deliver cash in lieu of shares at Maturity, it will be obligated to deliver cash
with respect to all, but not less than all, of the shares of Enhance Common
Stock that would otherwise be deliverable, except that if U S WEST believes
that, upon advice of counsel, the delivery of cash to a holder at Maturity may
violate applicable state law, U S WEST may elect to deliver shares to such
holder. On or prior to the seventh Business Day prior to , 1998, U S
WEST will notify The Depository Trust Company and the Trustee and publish a
notice in a daily newspaper of national circulation stating whether the
principal amount of each DECS will be exchanged for shares of Enhance Common
Stock or cash; provided, however, that if U S WEST intends to deliver cash, U S
WEST shall have the right, as a condition to delivery of such cash, to require
certification as to the domicile and residency of each beneficial holder of
DECS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) in the case of certain dilution events,
the Exchange Rate will be subject to adjustment and (ii) in the case of certain
reorganization events, the consideration received by holders of DECS at Maturity
will be cash or other property. See "-- Dilution Adjustments; Reorganization
Events" below.
The "Maturity Price" is defined as the average Closing Price per share of
Enhance Common Stock on the 20 Trading Days immediately prior to (but not
including) the date of Maturity; provided, however, that if there are not 20
Trading Days for the Enhance Common Stock following the calendar day
immediately prior to, but not including, the date of maturity, "Maturity Price"
shall be defined as the market value per share of Enhance Common Stock as of
Maturity as determined by a nationally recognized investment banking firm
retained for such purpose by U S WEST. The "Closing Price" of any security on
any date of determination means the closing sale price (or, if no closing price
is reported, the last reported sale price) of such security (regular way) on the
NYSE on such date or, if such security is not listed for trading on the NYSE on
any such date, as reported in the composite transactions for the principal
United States securities exchange on which such security is so listed, or if
such security is not so listed on a United States national or regional
securities exchange, as reported by the NASDAQ National Market, or, if such
security is not so reported, the last quoted bid price for such security in the
over-the-counter market as reported by the National Quotation Bureau or similar
organization. A "Trading Day" is defined as a day on which the security the
Closing Price of which is being determined (A) is not suspended from trading on
any national or regional securities exchange or association or over-the-counter
market at the close of business and (B) has traded at least once on the national
or regional securities exchange or association or over-the-counter market that
is the primary market for the trading of such security. "Business Day" means any
day that is not a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which the NYSE, banking
institutions or trust companies in The City of New York are authorized or
obligated by law or executive order to close.
For illustrative purposes only, the following chart shows the number of
shares of Enhance Common Stock or the amount of cash that a holder of DECS would
receive for each DECS at various Maturity Prices. The table assumes that there
will be no adjustments to the Exchange Rate described under "-- Dilution
Adjustments" below. There can be no assurance that the Maturity Price will be
within the range set forth below. Given the Initial Price of $ per DECS and
the Threshold Appreciation Price of $ , a DECS holder would receive at
Maturity the following number of shares of Enhance Common Stock or amount of
cash (if U S WEST elects to pay the DECS in cash):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MATURITY PRICE OF NUMBER OF SHARES OF
ENHANCE ENHANCE
COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK AMOUNT OF CASH
- ----------------- --------------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
$ $
</TABLE>
Interest on the DECS will be payable, and delivery of Enhance Common Stock
(or, at the option of U S WEST, its cash equivalent) in exchange for the DECS at
Maturity will be made upon surrender of such DECS, at the office or agency of U
S WEST maintained for such purposes; provided, however, that payment of interest
may be made at the option of U S WEST by check mailed to the persons in whose
names the DECS are registered at the close of business on ,
, and . See "-- Book-Entry System." Initially such
office will be the principal corporate trust office of First Chicago Trust
Company of New York, 14 Wall Street, 8th Fl, New York, NY 10005.
S-12
<PAGE>
The DECS will be transferable at any time or from time to time at the
aforementioned office. No service charge will be made to the holder for any such
transfer except for any tax or governmental charge incidental thereto.
The Indenture does not contain any restriction on the ability of U S WEST to
sell, pledge or convey all or any portion of the Enhance Common Stock held by it
or its subsidiaries, and no such shares of Enhance Common Stock will be pledged
or otherwise held in escrow for use at Maturity of the DECS. Consequently, in
the event of a bankruptcy, insolvency or liquidation of U S WEST or its
subsidiaries, the Enhance Common Stock, if any, owned by U S WEST or its
subsidiaries will be subject to the claims of the creditors of U S WEST or its
subsidiaries, respectively. In addition, as described herein, U S WEST will have
the option, exercisable in its sole discretion, to satisfy its obligations
pursuant to the mandatory exchange for the principal amount of each DECS at
Maturity by delivering to holders of the DECS either the number of shares of
Enhance Common Stock specified above or cash in an amount equal to the product
of such number of shares multiplied by the Maturity Price. In the event of such
a sale, pledge or conveyance, a holder of the DECS may be more likely to receive
cash in lieu of Enhance Common Stock. As a result, there can be no assurance
that U S WEST will elect at Maturity to deliver Enhance Common Stock or, if it
so elects, that it will use all or any portion of its current holdings of
Enhance Common Stock to make such delivery. Consequently, holders of the DECS
will not be entitled to any rights with respect to Enhance Common Stock
(including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to receive any
dividends or other distributions in respect thereof) until such time, if any, as
U S WEST shall have delivered shares of Enhance Common Stock to holders of the
DECS at Maturity thereof.
DILUTION ADJUSTMENTS; REORGANIZATION EVENTS
The Exchange Rate is subject to adjustment if Enhance shall (i) pay a stock
dividend or make a distribution with respect to Enhance Common Stock in shares
of such stock, (ii) subdivide or split its outstanding shares of Enhance Common
Stock, (iii) combine its outstanding shares of Enhance Common Stock into a
smaller number of shares, (iv) issue by reclassification (other than a
reclassification upon a Reorganization Event, described in the following
paragraph) of its shares of Enhance Common Stock any shares of common stock of
Enhance, (v) issue rights or warrants to all holders of Enhance Common Stock
entitling them to subscribe for or purchase shares of Enhance Common Stock at a
price per share less than the market price of the Enhance Common Stock (other
than rights to purchase Enhance Common Stock pursuant to a plan for the
reinvestment of dividends or interest) or (vi) pay a dividend or make a
distribution to all holders of Enhance Common Stock of evidences of its
indebtedness or other assets (excluding any dividends or distributions referred
to in clause (i) above, any shares of common stock issued pursuant to a
reclassification referred to in clause (iv) above or any cash dividends other
than any Extraordinary Cash Dividends (as defined below)) or issue to all
holders of Enhance Common Stock rights or warrants to subscribe for or purchase
any of its securities (other than those referred to in clause (v) above). In the
case of the events referred to in clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) above, the
Exchange Rate shall be adjusted by adjusting each of the Share Components of the
Exchange Rate in effect immediately prior to such event so that a holder of any
DECS shall be entitled to receive, upon mandatory exchange of the principal
amount of such DECS at Maturity pursuant to either Share Component of the
Exchange Rate, the number of shares of Enhance Common Stock (or, in the case of
a reclassification referred to in clause (iv) above, the number of shares of
other common stock of Enhance issued pursuant thereto) which such holder of such
DECS would have owned or been entitled to receive immediately following such
event had such DECS been exchanged pursuant to either Share Component of the
Exchange Rate immediately prior to such event or any record date with respect
thereto. In the case of the event referred to in clause (v) above, the Exchange
Rate shall be adjusted by multiplying each of the Share Components of the
Exchange Rate in effect immediately prior to the date of issuance of the rights
or warrants referred to in clause (v) above, by a fraction, of which the
numerator shall be the number of shares of Enhance Common Stock outstanding on
the date of issuance of such rights or warrants, immediately prior to such
issuance, plus the number of additional shares of Enhance Common Stock offered
for subscription or purchase pursuant to such rights or warrants, and of which
the denominator shall be the number of shares of Enhance Common Stock
outstanding on the date of
S-13
<PAGE>
issuance of such rights or warrants, immediately prior to such issuance, plus
the number of additional shares of Enhance Common Stock which the aggregate
offering price of the total number of shares of Enhance Common Stock so offered
for subscription or purchase pursuant to such rights or warrants would purchase
at the market price (determined as the average Closing Price per share of
Enhance Common Stock on the 20 Trading Days immediately prior to the date such
rights or warrants are issued), which shall be determined by multiplying such
total number of shares by the exercise price of such rights or warrants and
dividing the product so obtained by such market price. To the extent that shares
of Enhance Common Stock are not delivered after the expiration of such rights or
warrants, the Exchange Rate shall be readjusted to the Exchange Rate which would
then be in effect had such adjustments for the issuance of such rights or
warrants been made upon the basis of delivery of only the number of shares of
Enhance Common Stock actually delivered. In the case of the event referred to in
clause (vi) above, the Exchange Rate shall be adjusted by multiplying each of
the Share Components of the Exchange Rate in effect on the record date with
respect to such dividend or distribution referred to in clause (vi) above, by a
fraction of which the numerator shall be the market price per share of the
Enhance Common Stock on the record date for the determination of stockholders
entitled to receive the dividend or distribution referred to in clause (vi)
above (such market price being determined as the average Closing Price per share
of Enhance Common Stock on the 20 Trading Days immediately prior to such record
date), and of which the denominator shall be such market price per share of
Enhance Common Stock less the fair market value (as determined by the Board of
Directors of U S WEST, whose determination shall be conclusive, and described in
a resolution adopted with respect thereto) as of such record date of the portion
of the assets or evidences of indebtedness so distributed or of such
subscription rights or warrants applicable to one share of Enhance Common Stock.
An "Extraordinary Cash Dividend" means, with respect to any one-year period, all
cash dividends on the Enhance Common Stock during such period to the extent such
dividends exceed on a per share basis 10% of the average price of the Enhance
Common Stock over such period (less any such dividends for which a prior
adjustment to the Exchange Rate was previously made). All adjustments to the
Exchange Rate will be calculated to the nearest 1/10,000th of a share of Enhance
Common Stock (or, if there is not a nearest 1/10,000th of a share, to the next
lower 1/10,000th of a share). No adjustment in the Exchange Rate shall be
required unless such adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at
least one percent therein; provided, however, that any adjustments which by
reason of the foregoing are not required to be made shall be carried forward and
taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. If an adjustment is made to the
Exchange Rate pursuant to clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) or (vi) above, an
adjustment shall also be made to the Maturity Price solely to determine which of
clauses (a), (b) or (c) of the Exchange Rate definition will apply at Maturity.
The required adjustment to the Maturity Price shall be made at Maturity by
multiplying the Maturity Price by the number or fraction determined pursuant to
the Exchange Rate adjustment procedure described above. In the case of the
reclassification of any shares of Enhance Common Stock into any shares of common
stock of Enhance other than Enhance Common Stock, such shares of common stock
shall be deemed shares of Enhance Common Stock solely to determine the Maturity
Price and to apply the Exchange Rate at Maturity. Each such adjustment to the
Exchange Rate and the Maturity Price shall be made successively.
In the event of (A) any consolidation or merger of Enhance, or any surviving
entity or subsequent surviving entity of Enhance (an "Enhance Successor"), with
or into another entity (other than a merger or consolidation in which Enhance is
the continuing corporation and in which the Enhance Common Stock outstanding
immediately prior to the merger or consolidation is not exchanged for cash,
securities or other property of Enhance or another corporation), (B) any sale,
transfer, lease or conveyance to another corporation of the property of Enhance
or any Enhance Successor as an entirety or substantially as an entirety, (C) any
statutory exchange of securities of Enhance or any Enhance Successor with
another corporation (other than in connection with a merger or acquisition) or
(D) any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Enhance or any Enhance
Successor (any such event, a "Reorganization Event"), each holder of DECS will
receive at Maturity, in lieu of shares of Enhance Common Stock, as described
above, cash in an amount equal to (a) if the Transaction Value (as defined
below) is greater than or equal to the Threshold Appreciation Price,
multiplied by the Transaction Value, (b) if the Transaction Value is
S-14
<PAGE>
less than the Threshold Appreciation Price but greater than the Initial Price,
the Initial Price and (c) if the Transaction Value is less than or equal to the
Initial Price, the Transaction Value. "Transaction Value" means (i) for any cash
received in any such Reorganization Event, the amount of cash received per share
of Enhance Common Stock, (ii) for any property other than cash or securities
received in any such Reorganization Event, an amount equal to the market value
at Maturity of such property received per share of Enhance Common Stock as
determined by a nationally recognized independent investment banking firm
retained for this purpose by U S WEST and (iii) for any securities received in
any such Reorganization Event, an amount equal to the average Closing Price per
share of such securities on the 20 Trading Days immediately prior to Maturity
multiplied by the number of such securities received for each share of Enhance
Common Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of delivering cash as
provided above, U S WEST may at its option deliver an equivalent value of
securities or other property received in such Reorganization Event, determined
in accordance with clause (ii) or (iii) above, as applicable. If U S WEST elects
to deliver securities or other property, holders of the DECS will be responsible
for the payment of any and all brokerage and other transaction costs upon the
sale of such securities or other property. The kind and amount of securities
into which the DECS shall be exchangeable after consummation of such transaction
shall be subject to adjustment as described in the immediately preceding
paragraph following the date of consummation of such transaction.
No adjustments will be made for certain other events, such as offerings of
Enhance Common Stock by Enhance for cash or in connection with acquisitions.
U S WEST is required, within ten Business Days following the occurrence of
an event that requires an adjustment to the Exchange Rate (or if U S WEST is not
aware of such occurrence, as soon as practicable after becoming so aware), to
provide written notice to the Trustee of the occurrence of such event and a
statement in reasonable detail setting forth the method by which the adjustment
to the Exchange Rate was determined and setting forth the revised Exchange Rate,
provided, however, that, in respect of any adjustment to the Maturity Price,
such notice will only disclose the factor by which the Maturity Price is to be
multiplied in order to determine which clause of the Exchange Rate definition
will apply at Maturity.
FRACTIONAL SHARES
No fractional shares of Enhance Common Stock will be issued if U S WEST
exchanges the DECS for shares of Enhance Common Stock. If more than one DECS
shall be surrendered for exchange at one time by the same holder, the number of
full shares of Enhance Common Stock which shall be delivered upon exchange, in
whole or in part, as the case may be, shall be computed on the basis of the
aggregate number of DECS so surrendered at maturity. In lieu of any fractional
share otherwise issuable in respect of all DECS of any holder which are
exchanged at Maturity, such holder shall be entitled to receive an amount in
cash equal to the value of such fractional share at the Maturity Price.
REDEMPTION
The DECS are not subject to redemption prior to Maturity and do not contain
sinking fund or other mandatory redemption provisions. The DECS are not subject
to payment prior to the date of Maturity at the option of the holder.
BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM
It is expected that the DECS will be issued in the form of one or more
global securities (the "Global Securities") deposited with The Depository Trust
Company (the "Depositary") and registered in the name of a nominee of the
Depositary.
The Depositary has advised U S WEST and the Underwriter as follows: The
Depositary is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the laws of the
State of New York, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing
corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a
"clearing agency" registered pursuant to Section 17A of the Exchange Act. The
Depositary was created to hold securities of persons who have accounts with the
Depositary ("participants") and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of
securities transactions among its participants in such securities
S-15
<PAGE>
through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of the participants, thereby
eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Such participants
include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing
corporations. Indirect access to the Depositary's book-entry system also is
available to others, such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that
clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a participant, either
directly or indirectly.
Upon the issuance of a Global Security, the Depositary or its nominee will
credit the respective DECS represented by such Global Security to the accounts
of participants. The accounts to be credited shall be designated by the
Underwriter. Ownership of beneficial interests in the Global Securities will be
limited to participants or persons that may hold interests through participants.
Ownership of beneficial interests by participants in such Global Securities will
be shown on, and the transfer of those ownership interests will be effected only
through, records maintained by the Depositary or its nominee for such Global
Securities. Ownership of beneficial interests in such Global Securities by
persons that hold through participants will be shown on, and the transfer of
that ownership interest within such participant will be effected only through,
records maintained by such participant. The laws of some jurisdictions require
that certain purchasers of securities take physical delivery of such securities
in definitive form. Such limits and such laws may impair the ability to transfer
beneficial interests in a Global Security.
So long as the Depositary for a Global Security, or its nominee, is the
registered owner of such Global Security, such depositary or such nominee, as
the case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the DECS for all
purposes under the Indenture. Except as set forth below, owners of beneficial
interests in such Global Securities will not be entitled to have the DECS
registered in their names, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical
delivery of the DECS in definitive form and will not be considered the owners or
holders thereof under the Indenture.
Payment of principal of and any interest on the DECS registered in the name
of or held by the Depositary or its nominee will be made to the Depositary or
its nominee, as the case may be, as the registered owner or the holder of the
Global Security. None of U S WEST, the Trustee, any Paying Agent or any
securities registrar for the DECS will have any responsibility or liability for
any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial
ownership interests in a Global Security or for maintaining, supervising or
reviewing any records relating to such beneficial ownership interests.
U S WEST expects that the Depositary, upon receipt of any payment of
principal or interest in respect of a permanent Global Security, will credit
immediately participants' accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to
their respective beneficial interests in the principal amount of such Global
Security as shown on the records of the Depositary. U S WEST also expects that
payments by participants to owners of beneficial interests in such Global
Security held through such participants will be governed by standing
instructions and customary practices, as is now the case with securities held
for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name", and
will be the responsibility of such participants.
A Global Security may not be transferred except as a whole by the Depositary
to a nominee or a successor of the Depositary. If the Depositary is at any time
unwilling or unable to continue as depositary and a successor depositary is not
appointed by U S WEST within ninety days, U S WEST will issue DECS in definitive
registered form in exchange for the Global Security representing such DECS. In
addition, U S WEST may at any time and in its sole discretion determine not to
have any DECS represented by one or more Global Securities and, in such event,
will issue DECS in definitive form in exchange for all of the Global Securities
representing the DECS. Further, if U S WEST so specifies with respect to the
DECS, an owner of a beneficial interest in a Global Security representing DECS
may, on terms acceptable to U S WEST and the Depositary for such Global
Security, receive DECS in definitive form. In any such instance, an owner of a
beneficial interest in a Global Security will be entitled to physical delivery
in definitive form of DECS represented by such Global Security equal in number
to that represented by such beneficial interest and to have such DECS registered
in its name.
S-16
<PAGE>
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is based upon the advice of U S WEST's counsel,
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, as to certain of the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to a citizen or resident of the United States,
a corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized under the laws
of the United States and an estate or trust the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source (any of the foregoing, a
"U.S. person") who is the beneficial owner of a DECS (a "U.S. Holder"). All
references to "holders" (including U.S. Holders) are to beneficial owners of the
DECS. This summary is based on U.S. federal income tax laws, regulations,
rulings and decisions in effect as of the date of this Prospectus Supplement (or
in the case of certain Treasury regulations now in proposed form), all of which
are subject to change at any time (possibly with retroactive effect). As the law
is technical and complex, the discussion below necessarily represents only a
general summary.
This summary addresses the U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders
who are initial holders of the DECS and who will hold the DECS and, if
applicable, Enhance Common Stock as capital assets. This summary does not
address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to a
particular holder in light of his or its individual investment circumstances or
to certain types of holders subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal
income tax laws, such as dealers in securities or foreign currency, financial
institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations and taxpayers
holding the DECS as part of a "straddle", "hedge", "conversion transaction",
"synthetic security", or other integrated investment. Moreover, the effect of
any applicable state, local or foreign tax laws is not discussed.
No statutory, judicial or administrative authority directly addresses the
characterization of the DECS or instruments similar to the DECS for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. As a result, significant aspects of the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of an investment in the DECS are not certain. No ruling is
being requested from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") with respect to
the DECS and no assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with the
conclusions expressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, A PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR (INCLUDING A
TAX-EXEMPT INVESTOR) IN THE DECS SHOULD CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR IN DETERMINING
THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF AN INVESTMENT IN THE DECS, INCLUDING THE APPLICATION OF
STATE, LOCAL OR OTHER TAX LAWS AND THE POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FEDERAL OR
OTHER TAX LAWS.
Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, U S WEST and all holders of the DECS
will be obligated to treat the DECS as a unit (the "Unit") consisting of (i) an
exchange note ("Exchange Note") which is a debt obligation with a fixed
principal amount unconditionally payable at Maturity equal to the principal
amount of the DECS, bearing interest at the stated interest rate of the DECS,
and (ii) a forward purchase contract (the "Purchase Contract") pursuant to which
the holder agrees to use the principal payment due on the Exchange Note to
purchase at Maturity the Enhance Common Stock which the holder is entitled to
receive at that time (subject to U S WEST's right to deliver cash in lieu of the
Enhance Common Stock). The Indenture will require that a U.S. Holder include
currently in income payments denominated as interest that are made with respect
to the DECS, in accordance with such holder's method of accounting.
Pursuant to the agreement to treat the DECS as a Unit, a holder will be
required to allocate the purchase price of the DECS between the two components
of the Unit (the Exchange Note and the Purchase Contract) on the basis of their
relative fair market values. The purchase price so allocated will generally
constitute the tax basis for each component. Pursuant to the terms of the
Indenture, U S WEST and the holders agree to allocate the entire purchase price
of the DECS to the Exchange Note. Upon the sale or other disposition of a DECS,
a U.S. Holder generally will be required to allocate the amount realized between
the two components of the DECS on the basis of their then relative fair market
values. A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss with respect to each component
equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or other
disposition for each such component and the U.S. Holder's tax basis in such
component. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if
the U.S. Holder has held the DECS for more than one year at the time of
disposition.
S-17
<PAGE>
At maturity, pursuant to the agreement to treat the DECS as a Unit, on the
repayment of the Exchange Note, a U.S. Holder will recognize long-term capital
gain or loss equal to any differences between its tax basis and the principal
amount of the Exchange Note. (In general, an initial holder who has allocated
all of its purchase price to the Exchange Note should not have gain or loss on
repayment because its tax basis will equal the principal amount.) If U S WEST
delivers Enhance Common Stock, a U.S. Holder will recognize no additional gain
or loss on the exchange, pursuant to the Purchase Contract, of the principal
payment due on the Exchange Note for the Enhance Common Stock. However, a U.S.
Holder will recognize additional gain or loss (which will be short-term capital
gain or loss rather than long-term capital gain or loss) with respect to cash
received in lieu of fractional shares. The amount of such gain or loss
recognized by a U.S. Holder will be equal to the difference between the cash
received and the portion of the principal amount of the Exchange Note allocable
to fractional shares. A U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in such stock equal to
the principal amount of the Exchange Note less the amount of the portion of the
principal amount of the Exchange Note allocable to the fractional shares and
will realize capital gain or loss upon the sale or disposition of such stock.
Alternatively, at Maturity, if U S WEST pays the DECS in cash, a U.S. Holder
will have capital gain or loss equal to any difference between the principal
amount of the Exchange Note and the amount of cash received from U S WEST.
Due to the absence of authority as to the proper characterization of the
DECS, no assurance can be given that the IRS will accept or that a court will
uphold the characterization and tax treatment described above. Proposed Treasury
regulations issued in 1994 with respect to "contingent payment" debt instruments
(the "Proposed Regulations") would provide for a different tax result under some
circumstances for instruments with characteristics similar to the DECS, but the
Proposed Regulations would be effective only for instruments issued 60 days or
more after publication as final regulations. Under the Proposed Regulations, the
amount of interest included in a holder's taxable income for any year would
generally be determined by projecting the amounts of contingent payments and the
yield on the instrument. Taxable interest income would be measured with
reference to the projected yield, which might be less than or greater than the
stated interest rate under the instrument. In the event that the amount of an
actual contingent payment differed from the projected amount of that payment,
the difference would generally increase or reduce taxable interest income, or
create a loss. Because of their prospective effective date, the Proposed
Regulations, if finalized in their current form, would not apply to the DECS. In
addition, it is unclear whether the IRS would view a single instrument that has
"principal" that is entirely contingent as debt for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
Even in the absence of regulations applicable to the DECS, the DECS may be
characterized in a manner that results in tax consequences different from those
reflected in the agreement and described above, including treating the DECS as a
single instrument or treating the Purchase Contract element of the DECS as
itself the combination of a forward contract and one or more options. Under
alternative characterizations of the DECS, it is possible, for example, that (i)
gain may be treated as ordinary income, instead of capital gain, (ii) a U.S.
Holder may be taxable upon the receipt of Enhance Common Stock with a value in
excess of the principal amount of the Exchange Note, rather than upon the sale
of such stock, or (iii) all or part of the interest income on the Exchange Note
may be treated as nontaxable, increasing the gain (or decreasing the loss) at
Maturity or disposition of the DECS (or disposition of the Enhance Common
Stock).
The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 added Section 1258 to the Internal
Revenue Code, which may require certain holders of the DECS who have entered
into hedging transactions or offsetting positions with respect to the DECS to
recognize ordinary income rather than capital gain upon the disposition of the
DECS. In addition, if the DECS is hedged, or is itself a hedge, the timing of
income for the DECS may be affected. Holders should consult their tax advisors
regarding the applicability of this legislation to an investment in the DECS.
S-18
<PAGE>
NON-UNITED STATES PERSONS
In the case of a holder of the DECS that is not a U.S. person, payments made
with respect to the DECS should not be subject to U.S. withholding tax; PROVIDED
that such holder complies with applicable certification requirements. Any
capital gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of the DECS by a holder
that is not a U.S. person will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income
tax if (i) such gain is not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business
of such holder and (ii) in the case of an individual, such individual is not
present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the
sale or other disposition or the gain is not attributable to a fixed place of
business maintained by such individual in the United States.
BACKUP WITHHOLDING AND INFORMATION REPORTING
A holder of the DECS may be subject to information reporting and to backup
withholding at a rate of 31 percent of certain amounts paid to the holder unless
such holder provides proof of an applicable exemption or a correct taxpayer
identification number, and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of
the backup withholding rules. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding
rules are not an additional tax and may be refunded or credited against the U.S.
Holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is
furnished to the IRS.
S-19
<PAGE>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Underwriting Agreement
(the "Underwriting Agreement") among U S WEST, Enhance and Salomon Brothers Inc,
U S WEST has agreed to sell to the Underwriter, and the Underwriter has agreed
to purchase, the number of DECS set forth below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
UNDERWRITER DECS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
<S> <C>
Salomon Brothers Inc.............................................................
</TABLE>
In the Underwriting Agreement, the Underwriter has agreed, subject to the
terms and conditions set forth therein, that the obligations of the Underwriter
are subject to certain conditions precedent and that the Underwriter will be
obligated to purchase all of the DECS offered hereby if any of the DECS are
purchased.
U S WEST has been advised by the Underwriter that it proposes to offer the
DECS directly to the public initially at the public offering price set forth on
the cover of this Prospectus Supplement and to certain dealers at such price
less a concession not in excess of $0. per DECS. The Underwriter may allow, and
such dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $0. per DECS to other
dealers. After the initial public offering, such public offering price and such
concession and reallowance may be changed.
U S WEST and Enhance have agreed not to offer for sale, sell or contract to
sell, or otherwise dispose of, or announce the offering of, without the prior
written consent of the Underwriter, any shares of Enhance Common Stock or any
securities convertible into or exchangeable for, or warrants to acquire, Enhance
Common Stock for a period of days after the date of this Prospectus
Supplement; provided, however, that such restriction shall not affect the
ability of (i) U S WEST, Enhance or their respective subsidiaries to take any
such actions in connection with the offering of the DECS made hereby or any
exchange at Maturity pursuant to the terms of the DECS or (ii) Enhance to take
any such actions in connection with any employee stock option plan, stock
ownership plan or dividend reinvestment plan of Enhance in effect at the date of
this Prospectus Supplement.
U S WEST has granted to the Underwriter an option, exercisable for the
30-day period after the date of this Prospectus Supplement, to purchase up to an
additional 530,800 DECS from U S WEST, at the same price per DECS as the initial
DECS to be purchased by the Underwriter. The Underwriter may exercise such
option only for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, incurred in
connection with the sale of DECS offered hereby.
The DECS will be a new issue of securities with no established trading
market. The DECS will not be listed or traded on any securities exchange or
trading market. The Underwriter intends to make a market in the DECS, subject to
applicable laws and regulations. However, the Underwriter is not obligated to do
so and any such market-making may be discontinued at any time at the sole
discretion of the Underwriter without notice. Accordingly, no assurance can be
given as to the liquidity of such market.
The Underwriting Agreement provides that U S WEST and Enhance will indemnify
the Underwriter against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act, or contribute to payments the Underwriter may be required to
make in respect thereof.
The Underwriter has from time to time performed various investment banking
and financial advisory services for U S WEST, Enhance and their affiliates, for
which customary compensation has been received.
S-20
<PAGE>
LEGAL OPINIONS
The validity of the DECS will be passed upon for U S WEST by Weil, Gotshal &
Manges and for the Underwriter by Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton. Certain
tax matters with respect to the DECS also will be passed upon by Weil, Gotshal &
Manges. Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton will rely
as to all matters of Colorado law upon the opinion of Stephen E. Brilz, Senior
Counsel and Assistant Secretary of U S WEST.
S-21
<PAGE>
INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY
OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES
EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE
SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES
IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR
TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY SUCH STATE.
<PAGE>
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OCTOBER 6, 1995
PROSPECTUS
[LOGO]
$500,000,000
U S WEST, INC.
DEBT SECURITIES
U S WEST, Inc. ("U S WEST"), a Colorado corporation, from time to time may offer
its notes, debentures, or other debt securities (the "Debt Securities"). The
Debt Securities offered pursuant to this Prospectus may be issued in one or more
series and will be limited to $500,000,000 aggregate public offering price.
Certain specific terms of the particular series of Debt Securities will be set
forth in a supplement to this Prospectus (the "Prospectus Supplement") which
will be delivered together with this Prospectus, including, where applicable,
the specific designation, aggregate principal amount, denomination, maturity,
premium, if any, the rate (which may be fixed or variable), time and method of
calculating payment of interest, if any, the place or places where principal of,
premium, if any, and interest, if any, on such Debt Securities will be payable,
optional or mandatory redemption and sinking fund provisions, if any,
conversion, exercise or exchange provisions, if any, and any other specific
terms in respect of the offering and sale of the Debt Securities.
The Debt Securities may be offered and sold through one or more underwriters,
directly by U S WEST, or through dealers or agents. The names of any
underwriters, dealers or agents involved in the distribution of the Debt
Securities in respect of which this Prospectus is being delivered, and any
applicable discounts, commissions or allowances, will be set forth in the
applicable Prospectus Supplement. See "Plan of Distribution" for possible
indemnification arrangements for any underwriters, dealers or agents. Unless
otherwise provided in the Prospectus Supplement relating thereto, the Debt
Securities will not be listed on any securities exchange.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
THIS PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE USED TO CONSUMMATE SALES OF SECURITIES UNLESS
ACCOMPANIED BY A PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.
THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS , 1995.
<PAGE>
The Debt Securities will be sold directly, through agents, underwriters or
dealers as designated from time to time, or through a combination of such
methods. If agents or any dealers or underwriters are involved in the sale of
the Debt Securities in respect of which this Prospectus is being delivered, the
names of such agents, dealers or underwriters and any applicable commissions or
discounts will be set forth in or may be calculated from the Prospectus
Supplement with respect to such Debt Securities.
No dealer, salesperson or any other individual has been authorized by U S
WEST to give any information or to make any representation other than those
contained or incorporated by reference in this Prospectus or any accompanying
Prospectus Supplement and, if given or made, such information or representation
must not be relied upon as having been authorized. This Prospectus does not
constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the
securities offered hereby in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is
unlawful to make such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. Neither the
delivery of this Prospectus nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any
circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the
affairs of U S WEST since the date hereof.
------------------------
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
U S WEST is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and, in accordance
therewith, files reports, proxy statements, and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Such reports, proxy
statements, and other information concerning U S WEST can be inspected and
copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission at 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 20549, and at the Commission's
Regional Offices at Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York
10048, and Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago,
Illinois 60601. Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public
Reference Section of the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Such reports, proxy statements and
other information concerning U S WEST may also be inspected at the offices of
the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005 and
the Pacific Stock Exchange, 301 Pine Street, San Francisco, California 94104,
the securities exchanges on which shares of U S WEST's common stock are listed.
U S WEST has filed with the Commission a registration statement on Form S-3
(herein, together with all amendments and exhibits, referred to as the
"Registration Statement") relating to the Debt Securities under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). This Prospectus does not contain
all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement, certain parts of
which are omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
Commission. For further information, reference is hereby made to the
Registration Statement, which is available for inspection and copying as set
forth above. Statements contained in this Prospectus or a Prospectus Supplement
as to the contents of any contract or other document which is filed as an
exhibit to the Registration Statement are not necessarily complete, and each
such statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
such contract or document.
2
<PAGE>
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents which have been filed by U S WEST with the
Commission (File No. 1-8611) are incorporated herein by reference: (i) Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, (ii) Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1995 and June 30, 1995 and (iii)
Current Reports on Form 8-K dated January 19, 1995, April 10, 1995, April 18,
1995, May 23, 1995 (as amended by Forms 8-K/A filed on July 12, 1995 and August
24, 1995), June 20, 1995, July 28, 1995, September 22, 1995 and September 28,
1995.
All documents filed by U S WEST pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the date of this Prospectus and prior to
the termination of the offering of the Securities shall be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into this Prospectus and to be a part hereof from the
date any such document is filed.
Any statement contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein or in any Prospectus Supplement shall be deemed
to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Prospectus or in any
Prospectus Supplement to the extent that a statement contained herein or therein
(or in any other subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein or therein) modifies or supersedes such
statement. Any such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed,
except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this Prospectus or
in any Prospectus Supplement.
U S WEST WILL PROVIDE WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH PERSON TO WHOM A PROSPECTUS IS
DELIVERED, UPON WRITTEN OR ORAL REQUEST OF SUCH PERSON, A COPY OF ANY OR ALL OF
THE DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN, OTHER THAN EXHIBITS TO
SUCH DOCUMENTS (UNLESS SUCH EXHIBITS ARE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
INTO SUCH DOCUMENTS). REQUESTS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO INVESTOR RELATIONS, U S
WEST, INC., 7800 EAST ORCHARD ROAD, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 (TELEPHONE NUMBER
(303) 793-6500).
------------------------
3
<PAGE>
U S WEST, INC.
U S WEST is a diversified global communications company engaged in the
telecommunications, cable, wireless communications and multimedia content and
services businesses. U S WEST conducts its businesses through two groups: the U
S WEST Communications Group (the "Communications Group") and the U S WEST Media
Group (the "Media Group"). The Communications Group, through U S WEST
Communications, Inc., provides regulated communications services to more than 25
million residential and business customers in the states of Arizona, Colorado,
Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon,
South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming (collectively, the "Communications
Group Region"). Such services include local telephone services, exchange access
services and certain long distance services, as well as various new services,
including Caller ID, voice messaging and high-speed data networking services.
The Communications Group also provides customer premise equipment and certain
communications services to business customers and governmental agencies both
inside and outside the Communications Group Region. The Media Group is comprised
of (i) cable and telecommunications network businesses outside the
Communications Group Region and internationally, (ii) domestic and international
wireless communications network businesses and (iii) domestic and international
multimedia content and services businesses. U S WEST was incorporated in 1983
under the laws of the State of Colorado and has its principal executive offices
at 7800 Orchard Road, Englewood, Colorado 80111 (telephone number (303)
793-6500).
U S WEST has announced a plan (the "Recapitalization Plan") to create two
classes of common stock that are intended to reflect separately the performance
of the Communications Group and the Media Group and to change the state of
incorporation of U S WEST from Colorado to Delaware. The Recapitalization Plan
will be effected in accordance with the terms of an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated August 17, 1995, between U S WEST and U S WEST, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("U S WEST Delaware") and wholly-owned subsidiary of U S WEST,
pursuant to which (i) U S WEST will be merged with and into U S WEST Delaware,
with U S WEST Delaware continuing as the surviving corporation and (ii) each
outstanding share of Common Stock, without par value, of U S WEST will be
converted into one share of U S WEST Communications Group Common Stock, par
value $.01 per share, of U S WEST Delaware, which is intended to reflect
separately the performance of the Communications Group, and one share of U S
WEST Media Group Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of U S WEST Delaware,
which is intended to reflect separately the performance of the Media Group.
The Recapitalization Plan will require the approval of U S WEST's
shareholders. U S WEST plans to seek such approval at a special meeting of
shareholders to be held on October 31, 1995. The Recapitalization Plan will not
affect the offer and sale by U S WEST of the Debt Securities. In addition, the
Recapitalization Plan will not result in the transfer of any assets from U S
WEST or any of its subsidiaries or alter the legal nature of U S WEST's
obligations to its creditors, including its obligations under the Debt
Securities. Creditors of U S WEST, including the holders of the Debt Securities,
will continue to benefit from the cash flow of the subsidiaries comprising both
the Communications Group and the Media Group, subject to the satisfaction of
obligations by such subsidiaries. The Recapitalization Plan is not expected to
have any adverse impact on U S WEST's credit rating.
4
<PAGE>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The following table sets forth the ratio of earnings to fixed charges from
continuing operations of U S WEST for the periods indicated. For the purpose of
calculating this ratio, earnings consist of income before income taxes and fixed
charges. Fixed charges include interest on indebtedness (excluding discontinued
operations) and the portion of rentals representative of the interest factor.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
- ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1994 1995
- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
4.07 3.11 3.85 2.38 4.85 4.98 4.09
</TABLE>
USE OF PROCEEDS
Unless otherwise specified in the Prospectus Supplement, U S WEST will apply
the net proceeds from the sale of the Debt Securities to its general funds to be
used for general corporate purposes, including the reduction of short-term and
long-term borrowings and other business opportunities.
DESCRIPTION OF DEBT SECURITIES
The following description sets forth certain general terms and provisions of
the Debt Securities to which any Prospectus Supplement may relate. The
particular terms and provisions of the series of Debt Securities offered by a
Prospectus Supplement, and the extent to which such general terms and provisions
described below may apply thereto, will be described in the Prospectus
Supplement relating to such series of Debt Securities.
The Debt Securities are to be issued under an Indenture (the "Indenture"),
dated as of , 1995, between U S WEST and The First National Bank of
Chicago, as Trustee (the "Trustee"). The following summaries of certain
provisions of the Debt Securities and the Indenture do not purport to be
complete and are subject to, and are qualified in their entirety by reference
to, all provisions of the Debt Securities and the Indenture, including the
definitions therein of certain terms. Wherever particular sections or defined
terms of the Indenture are referred to, it is intended that such sections or
defined terms shall be incorporated herein by reference.
GENERAL
The Indenture does not limit the aggregate principal amount of Debt
Securities that can be issued thereunder and debt securities may be issued
thereunder up to the aggregate principal amount which may be authorized from
time to time by, or pursuant to a resolution of, U S WEST's Board of Directors
or by a supplemental indenture. Reference is made to the Prospectus Supplement
for the following terms of the particular series of Debt Securities being
offered hereby: (i) the title of the Debt Securities of the series; (ii) any
limit upon the aggregate principal amount of the Debt Securities of the series;
(iii) the date or dates on which the principal of the Debt Securities of the
series will mature; (iv) the rate or rates (or manner of calculations thereof),
if any, at which the Debt Securities of the series will bear interest, the date
or dates from which any such interest will accrue and on which such interest
will be payable, and, with respect to Debt Securities of the series in
registered form, the record date for the interest payable on any interest
payment date; (v) the place or places where the principal of and interest, if
any, on the Debt Securities of the series will be payable; (vi) any redemption
or sinking fund provisions; (vii) if other than the entire principal amount
thereof, the portion of the principal amount of Debt Securities of the series
which will be payable upon declaration of acceleration of the maturity thereof;
(viii) whether the Debt Securities of the series will be issuable in registered
or bearer form or both, any restrictions applicable to the offer, sale or
delivery of Debt Securities in bearer form ("bearer Debt Securities"), and
whether, and the terms upon which, bearer Debt Securities will be exchangeable
for Debt Securities in registered form ("registered Debt Securities") and vice
versa; (ix) whether and under what circumstances U S WEST will pay additional
amounts on the Debt Securities of the series held by a person who is not a U.S.
person (as defined below) in respect of taxes or similar charges withheld or
deducted and, if so, whether U S WEST
5
<PAGE>
will have the option to redeem such Debt Securities rather than pay such
additional amounts; (x) whether the Debt Securities will be denominated or
provide for payment in United States dollars or a foreign currency or units of
two or more such foreign currencies; (xi) whether the Debt Securities of the
series will be convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of a
class of capital stock of U S WEST or any other corporation and the terms and
conditions relating thereto; and (xii) any additional provisions or other
special terms not inconsistent with the provisions of the Indenture, including
any terms which may be required by or advisable under United States laws or
regulations or advisable in connection with the marketing of Debt Securities of
such series. (Sections 2.01 and 2.02.) To the extent not described herein,
principal, premium, if any, and interest will be payable, and the Debt
Securities of a particular series will be transferable, in the manner described
in the Prospectus Supplement relating to such series.
Each series of Debt Securities will constitute unsecured and unsubordinated
indebtedness of U S WEST and will rank on a parity with U S WEST's other
indebtedness. However, since U S WEST is a holding company, the right of U S
WEST and, hence, the right of creditors of U S WEST (including the holders of
the Debt Securities) to participate in any distribution of the assets of any
subsidiaries of U S WEST, whether upon liquidation, reorganization, or
otherwise, is subject to prior claims of creditors of the subsidiary, except to
the extent that claims of U S WEST itself as a creditor of a subsidiary may be
recognized.
Debt Securities of any series may be issued as registered Debt Securities or
bearer Debt Securities or both as specified in the terms of the series. Unless
otherwise indicated in the Prospectus Supplement, Debt Securities will be issued
in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof, and bearer Debt
Securities will not be offered, sold, resold or delivered to U.S. persons in
connection with their original issuance. For purposes of this Prospectus, "U.S.
person" means a citizen, national or resident of the United States, a
corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized in or under the
laws of the United States, or any political subdivision thereof, or an estate or
trust which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of
its source of income.
To the extent set forth in the Prospectus Supplement, except in special
circumstances set forth in the Indenture, interest on bearer Debt Securities
will be payable only against presentation and surrender of the coupons for the
interest installments evidenced thereby as they mature at a paying agency of U S
WEST located outside of the United States and its possessions. (Section
2.05(c).) U S WEST will maintain such an agency for a period of two years after
the principal of such bearer Debt Securities has become due and payable. During
any period thereafter for which it is necessary in order to conform to United
States tax law or regulations, U S WEST will maintain a paying agent outside the
United States and its possessions to which the bearer Debt Securities may be
presented for payment and will provide the necessary funds therefor to such
paying agent upon reasonable notice. (Section 2.04.)
The general provisions of the Indenture do not afford holders of the Debt
Securities protection in the event of a highly-leveraged transaction,
reorganization, merger or similar transaction involving U S WEST that may
adversely affect holders of the Debt Securities.
Bearer Debt Securities and the coupons related thereto will be transferable
by delivery. (Section 2.08(e).)
If appropriate, federal income tax consequences applicable to a series of
Debt Securities will be described in the Prospectus Supplement relating thereto.
GLOBAL SECURITIES
The Debt Securities of a series may be issued in the form of one or more
fully registered global securities (each a "Global Security") that will be
deposited with, or on behalf of, a depositary (the "Depositary") identified in
the Prospectus Supplement relating to such series. Unless and until it is
exchanged for Debt Securities in definitive registered form, a Global Security
may not be transferred except as a whole by the Depositary for such Global
Security to a nominee of such Depositary or by a nominee of such Depositary to
such Depositary or another nominee of such Depositary or by such Depositary or
any such nominee to a successor of such Depositary or a nominee of such
successor.
6
<PAGE>
The specific terms of the depositary arrangements with respect to a series
of Debt Securities will be described in the Prospectus Supplement relating to
such series. U S WEST anticipates that the following provisions will apply to
all depositary arrangements.
Upon the issuance of a Global Security, the Depositary for such Global
Security will credit the accounts held with it with the respective principal
amounts of the Debt Securities represented by such Global Security. Such
accounts shall be designated by the underwriters or agents with respect to such
Debt Securities or by U S WEST if such Debt Securities are offered and sold
directly by U S WEST. Ownership of beneficial interests in a Global Security
will be limited to persons that have accounts with the Depositary for such
Global Security ("participants") or persons that may hold interests through
participants. Ownership of beneficial interests in such Global Security will be
shown on, and the transfer of that ownership will be effected only through,
records maintained by the Depositary for such Global Security or on the records
of participants. The laws of some states require that certain purchasers of
securities take physical delivery of such securities in definitive form. Such
limits and such laws may impair the ability to transfer beneficial interests in
a Global Security.
So long as the Depositary for a Global Security, or its nominee, is the
registered owner of such Global Security, such Depositary or such nominee, as
the case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the Debt
Securities represented by such Global Security for all purposes under the
Indenture governing such Debt Securities. Except as provided below, owners of
beneficial interests in a Global Security will not be entitled to have Debt
Securities of the series represented by such Global Security registered in their
names, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of Debt
Securities of such series in definitive form and will not be considered the
owners or holders thereof under the Indenture governing such Debt Securities.
Principal, premium, if any, and interest payments on Debt Securities
registered in the name of a Depositary or its nominee will be made to the
Depositary or its nominee, as the case may be, as the registered owner of the
Global Security representing such Debt Securities. Neither U S WEST, the Trustee
for such Debt Securities, any Paying Agent nor the Security Registrar for such
Debt Securities will have any responsibility or liability for any aspect of the
records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership
interests in the Global Security for such Debt Securities or for maintaining,
supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial ownership
interests.
U S WEST expects that the Depositary for a series of Debt Securities issued
in the form of a Global Security, upon receipt of any payment of principal,
premium or interest, will credit immediately participants' accounts with
payments in amounts proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in
the principal amount of the Global Security for such Debt Securities as shown on
the records of such Depositary. U S WEST also expects that payments by
participants to owners of beneficial interests in such Global Security held
through such participants will be governed by standing instructions and
customary practices, as is now the case with securities held for the accounts of
customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the
responsibility of such participants.
If a Depositary for a series of Debt Securities is at any time unwilling or
unable to continue as depositary and a successor depositary is not appointed by
U S WEST within 90 days, U S WEST will issue Debt Securities of such series in
definitive form in exchange for the Global Security representing such series of
Debt Securities. In addition, U S WEST may at any time and in its sole
discretion determine not to have the Debt Securities of a series represented by
a Global Security and, in such event, will issue Debt Securities of such series
in definitive form in exchange for the Global Security representing such series
of Debt Securities. In either instance, an owner of a beneficial interest in a
Global Security will be entitled to have Debt Securities of the series
represented by such Global Security equal in principal amount to such beneficial
interest registered in its name and will be entitled to physical delivery of
such Debt Securities in definitive form. Debt Securities of such series so
issued in definitive form will be issued in denominations of $1,000 and integral
multiples thereof and will be issued in registered form only, without coupons.
7
<PAGE>
EXCHANGE OF SECURITIES
To the extent permitted by the terms of a series of Debt Securities
authorized to be issued in registered form and bearer form, bearer Debt
Securities may be exchanged for an equal aggregate principal amount of
registered Debt Securities of the same series and date of maturity in such
authorized denominations as may be requested upon surrender of the bearer Debt
Securities with all unpaid coupons relating thereto, at an agency of U S WEST
maintained for such purpose and upon fulfillment of all other requirements of
such agent. (Section 2.08(b).) As of the date of this Prospectus, United States
Treasury regulations do not permit exchanges of registered Debt Securities for
bearer Debt Securities and, unless such regulations are modified, the terms of a
series of Debt Securities will not permit registered Debt Securities to be
exchanged for bearer Debt Securities.
AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
Subject to certain exceptions, the Indenture may be amended or supplemented
by U S WEST and the Trustee with the consent of the holders of a majority in
principal amount of the outstanding Debt Securities of each series affected by
the amendment or supplement (with each series voting as a class), or compliance
with any provision may be waived with the consent of the holders of a majority
in principal amount of the outstanding Debt Securities of each series affected
by such waiver (with each series voting as a class). However, without the
consent of each Debt Securityholder affected, an amendment or waiver may not (i)
reduce the amount of Debt Securities whose holders must consent to an amendment
or waiver; (ii) change the rate of or change the time for payment of interest on
any Debt Security; (iii) change the principal of or change the fixed maturity of
any Debt Security; (iv) change the terms of any Debt Securities so as to
adversely affect the terms on which such Debt Securities are convertible into,
or exchangeable or exercisable for, shares of a class of capital stock of U S
WEST or any other corporation; (v) waive a default in the payment of the
principal of or interest on any Debt Security; (vi) make any Debt Security
payable in money other than that stated in the Debt Security; or (vii) impair
the right to institute suit for the enforcement of any payment on or with
respect to any Debt Security. (Section 9.02.) The Indenture may be amended or
supplemented without the consent of any Debt Securityholder (i) to cure any
ambiguity, defect or inconsistency in the Indenture, or the Debt Securities of
any series; (ii) to provide for the assumption of all the obligations of U S
WEST under the Debt Securities, any coupons related thereto and the Indenture by
any corporation in connection with a merger, consolidation, transfer or lease of
U S WEST's property and assets substantially as an entirety, as provided for in
the Indenture; (iii) to provide for uncertificated Debt Securities in addition
to or in place of certificated Debt Securities; (iv) to make any change that
does not adversely affect the rights of any Debt Securityholder; (v) to provide
for the issuance of and establish the form and terms and conditions of a series
of Debt Securities endorsed thereon or to establish the form of any
certifications required to be furnished pursuant to the terms of the Indenture
or any series of Debt Securities; or (vi) to add to the rights of Debt
Securityholders. (Section 9.01.)
MERGER
U S WEST may consolidate with or merge into, or transfer or lease its
property and assets substantially as an entirety to, another entity if the
successor entity is a corporation and assumes all the obligations of U S WEST
under the Debt Securities and any coupons related thereto and the Indenture and
if, after giving effect to such transaction, a Default or Event of Default would
not occur or be continuing. Thereafter, all such obligations of U S WEST shall
terminate. (Sections 5.01 and 5.02.)
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
The following events are defined in the Indenture as "Events of Default"
with respect to a series of Debt Securities: (i) default in the payment of
interest on any Debt Security of such series for 90 days; (ii) default in the
payment of the principal of any Debt Security of such series; (iii) failure by U
S WEST for 90 days after notice to it to comply with any of its other agreements
in the Debt Securities of such series, in the Indenture or in any supplemental
indenture; and (iv) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency of U S WEST.
(Section 6.01.) If an Event of Default occurs with respect to the Debt
Securities of any series and is continuing, the Trustee or the holders of at
least 25% in principal amount of all of the outstanding
8
<PAGE>
Debt Securities of that series may declare the principal (or, if the Debt
Securities of that series are original issue discount Debt Securities, such
portion of the principal amount as may be specified in the terms of that series)
of all the Debt Securities of that series to be due and payable. Upon such
declaration, such principal (or, in the case of original issue discount Debt
Securities, such specified amount) shall be due and payable immediately.
(Section 6.02.)
Securityholders may not enforce the Indenture or the Debt Securities except
as provided in the Indenture. The Trustee may require indemnity satisfactory to
it before it enforces the Indenture or the Debt Securities. (Section 7.01.)
Subject to certain limitations, holders of a majority in principal amount of the
Debt Securities of each series affected (with each series voting as a class) may
direct the Trustee in its exercise of any trust power. (Section 6.05.) The
Trustee may withhold from holders of Debt Securities notice of any continuing
default (except a default in payment of principal or interest) if it determines
that withholding notice is in their interests. (Section 7.05.)
CONCERNING THE TRUSTEE
U S WEST and certain of its affiliates maintain banking relationships in the
ordinary course of business with the Trustee. In addition, the Trustee and
certain of its affiliates serve as trustee, authenticating agent or paying agent
with respect to certain debt securities of U S WEST and its affiliates.
9
<PAGE>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION OF SECURITIES
U S WEST may offer and sell the Debt Securities (i) to or through
underwriting syndicates represented by managing underwriters, (ii) to or through
underwriters without a syndicate, (iii) through dealers, (iv) through agents or
(v) through a combination of any such methods of sale. The Prospectus Supplement
with respect to each series of Debt Securities will set forth the terms of the
offering, including the name or names of any underwriters, dealers or agents,
the purchase price and the net proceeds to U S WEST from such sale, any
underwriting discounts, agency fees and other items constituting underwriters'
or agents' compensation, the initial public offering price and any discounts or
concessions allowed, re-allowed or paid to dealers.
If any underwriters are involved in the offer and sale, the Debt Securities
will be acquired by the underwriters and may be resold by them from time to time
in one or more transactions, including negotiated transactions, at a fixed
public offering price or at varying prices determined at the time of sale.
Unless otherwise set forth in the accompanying Prospectus Supplement, the
obligations of the underwriters to purchase the Debt Securities will be subject
to certain conditions precedent and the underwriters will be obligated to
purchase all the Securities described in such Prospectus Supplement if any are
purchased. Any initial public offering price and any discounts or concessions
allowed or re-allowed or paid to dealers may be changed from time to time.
The Debt Securities may be offered and sold by U S WEST directly or through
an agent or agents designated by U S WEST from time to time. Unless otherwise
indicated in the applicable Prospectus Supplement, any such agent or agents will
be acting on a best efforts basis for the period of its or their appointment.
Any agent participating in the distribution of the Debt Securities may be deemed
to be an "underwriter," as that term is defined in the Securities Act, of the
Securities so offered and sold. The Securities also may be sold to dealers, at
the applicable price to the public set forth in the applicable Prospectus
Supplement relating to a particular series of the Securities, who later resell
to investors. Such dealers may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning
of the Securities Act.
Underwriters, dealers and agents may be entitled, under agreements entered
into with U S WEST, to indemnification by U S WEST against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
The place and time of delivery for the Debt Securities in respect of which
this Prospectus is delivered will be set forth in the accompanying Prospectus
Supplement, if appropriate.
DELAYED DELIVERY ARRANGEMENTS
If so indicated in the Prospectus Supplement, U S WEST will authorize
dealers or other persons acting as U S WEST's agents to solicit offers by
certain institutions to purchase Debt Securities from U S WEST pursuant to
contracts providing for payment and delivery on a future date. Institutions with
which such contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks, insurance
companies, pension funds, investment companies, educational and charitable
institutions, and others, but in all cases such institutions must be approved by
U S WEST. The obligations of any purchaser under any such contract will not be
subject to any conditions except that (a) the purchaser of the Debt Securities
shall not at the time of delivery be prohibited from purchasing such securities
under the laws of the jurisdiction to which such purchaser is subject and (b) if
the Debt Securities are also being sold to underwriters, U S WEST shall have
sold to such underwriters the Debt Securities not sold for delayed delivery. The
dealers and such other persons will not have any responsibility in respect of
the validity or performance of such contracts.
10
<PAGE>
LEGAL OPINIONS
The validity of the Debt Securities will be passed upon by Stephen E. Brilz,
Senior Attorney of U S WEST.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and the consolidated financial
statement schedule included in U S WEST's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1994 are incorporated herein by reference in reliance on
the reports of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public
accountants, given upon the authority of that firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Time Warner Entertainment Company,
L.P. as of December 31, 1994 and 1993 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1994, which appear in the Current Report on Form 8-K
of U S WEST, dated May 23, 1995, as amended by Forms 8-K/ A filed on July 12,
1995 and August 24, 1995, are incorporated herein by reference in reliance on
the report of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, given upon the authority
of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Mercury Personal Communications (trading as
Mercury One-2-One) as of March 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 and for each of the three
years in the period ended March 31, 1994, which appear in the Current Report on
Form 8-K of U S WEST, dated May 23, 1995, as amended by Forms 8-K/A filed on
July 12, 1995 and August 24, 1995, are incorporated herein by reference in
reliance on the report of Arthur Andersen LLP, independent chartered
accountants, given upon the authority of that firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The combined financial statements of Georgia Cable Holdings Limited
Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships as of December 31, 1993 and 1992 and for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1993, which appear
in the Current Report on Form 8-K of U S WEST, dated May 23, 1995, as amended by
Forms 8-K/A filed on July 12, 1995 and August 24, 1995, have been incorporated
by reference herein and in the Registration Statement in reliance upon the
report of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent certified public accountants,
incorporated by reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Wometco Cable Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1993 and 1992 and for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 1993, which appear in the Current Report on
Form 8-K of U S WEST, dated May 23, 1995, as amended by Forms 8-K/ A filed on
July 12, 1995 and August 24, 1995, have been incorporated by reference herein in
reliance upon the report of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent certified public
accountants, incorporated by reference herein and in the Registration Statement,
and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The
report on the 1993 consolidated financial statements of Wometco Cable Corp. and
subsidiaries refers to a change in the method of accounting for income taxes in
1993 to adopt the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board FASB No.
109 -- Accounting for Income Taxes.
11
<PAGE>
Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may
offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes
effective. This prospectus shall not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities
in any State in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior
to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such State.
<PAGE>
APPENDIX A
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
[LOGO]
OCTOBER 6, 1995
PROSPECTUS
4,900,000 SHARES
ENHANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC.
COMMON STOCK
($.10 PAR VALUE)
This Prospectus relates to shares of common stock, par value $.10 per share (the
"Common Stock"), of Enhance Financial Services Group Inc., a New York
corporation ("Enhance Financial" and, together with its consolidated
subsidiaries, the "Company"), which may be delivered by U S WEST, Inc., a
Colorado corporation ("U S WEST"), or an affiliate thereof, at U S WEST's
option, pursuant to the terms of the % Exchangeable Notes due ,
1998 (the "Debt Exchangeable for Common Stock-SM-" or "DECS-SM-") of U S WEST.
This Prospectus is Appendix A to a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus of U S
WEST relating to the sale of 4,900,000 DECS (the "DECS Prospectus"). See
"Prospectus Summary." Enhance Financial will not receive any of the proceeds
from the sale of the DECS or delivery thereunder of shares of Common Stock to
which this Prospectus relates.
U S WEST has granted the underwriter of the DECS a 30-day option to purchase up
to an additional 530,800 DECS, which may be exchangeable at their maturity for
additional shares of Common Stock. Such option has been granted solely to cover
over-allotments, if any.
The Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the "NYSE")
under the symbol "EFS." On October 5, 1995, the last reported sale price of the
Common Stock on the NYSE Composite Tape was $20.50 per share. See "Price Range
of Common Stock and Dividends."
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 7 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT
SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED BY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS.
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The date of this Prospectus is , 1995.
<PAGE>
ENHANCE FINANCIAL HAS BEEN ADVISED THAT IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING BY U
S WEST OF THE DECS, THE UNDERWRITERS OF THE DECS MAY OVER-ALLOT OR EFFECT
TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE DECS OR THE
COMMON STOCK OF ENHANCE FINANCIAL AT A LEVEL ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE
PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH TRANSACTIONS MAY BE EFFECTED ON THE NYSE (WITH
RESPECT TO THE COMMON STOCK ONLY), IN THE OVER-THE-COUNTER MARKET OR OTHERWISE.
SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Enhance Financial is subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in
accordance therewith files reports, proxy statements and other information with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). The reports, proxy
statements and other information filed by Enhance Financial with the Commission
may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the
Commission at Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20549, and at the Commission's regional offices at Room 3190, Citicorp
Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661; and Seven
World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York 10048. Copies of such
material may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the Commission at
Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 at
prescribed rates.
Enhance Financial has filed with the Commission a Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"), with respect to the Common Stock offered hereby.
This Prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the
Registration Statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as a part thereof,
as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Commission. For further
information with respect to Enhance Financial and the Common Stock, reference is
hereby made to such Registration Statement, including the exhibits and schedules
filed as a part thereof. Statements contained in this Prospectus as to the
contents of any contract or other document referred to herein are not
necessarily complete and where such contract or other document is an exhibit to
the Registration Statement, each such statement is qualified in all respects by
the provisions of such exhibit, to which reference is hereby made for a full
statement of the provisions thereof. The Registration Statement, including the
exhibits and schedules filed as a part thereof, may be inspected without charge
at the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission as set forth in
the preceding paragraph. Copies of these documents may be obtained at prescribed
rates from the Public Reference Section of the Commission at Room 1024,
Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.
The Common Stock is listed on the NYSE. Reports, proxy statements,
information statements and other information concerning Enhance Financial can be
inspected at the offices of the NYSE, 120 Broad Street, New York, New York
10005.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents heretofore filed with the Commission (Registration
No. 1-10967) are hereby incorporated by reference in this Prospectus:
1. Enhance Financial's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994;
2. Enhance Financial's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters
ended March 31, 1995 and June 30, 1995; and
3. the description of the Common Stock contained in Enhance Financial's
registration statement, dated February 12, 1992, on Form 8-A.
2
<PAGE>
All documents filed by Enhance Financial pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c),
14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the date of this Prospectus and
prior to the termination of this offering shall be deemed to be incorporated by
reference in this Prospectus and to be a part hereof from the date of filing
such documents.
Any statement contained in a document incorporated by reference herein shall
be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Prospectus to the
extent that a statement contained herein modifies or supersedes such statement.
Any such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so
modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this Prospectus.
Enhance Financial hereby undertakes to provide without charge to each person
to whom a copy of this Prospectus has been delivered, on the written or oral
request of any such person, a copy of any or all of the documents referred to
above other than exhibits to such documents. Requests for such copies should be
directed to the Secretary of Enhance Financial, Enhance Financial Services Group
Inc., 335 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10017, telephone number (212)
983-3100.
------------------------
"Debt Exchangeable for Common Stock" and "DECS" are service marks of Salomon
Brothers Inc.
3
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE MORE DETAILED
INFORMATION APPEARING ELSEWHERE IN THIS PROSPECTUS OR INCORPORATED HEREIN. FOR
DEFINITIONS OF AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING CERTAIN TERMS USED HEREIN,
SEE "GLOSSARY OF INSURANCE TERMS."
Enhance Financial Services Group Inc. ("Enhance Financial" and, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, the "Company") is principally engaged,
through its subsidiaries, in the reinsurance of financial guaranties of
municipal and asset-backed debt obligations of monoline financial guaranty
insurers. In addition, the Company is engaged in the insurance and reinsurance
of various specialty lines of business that utilize the Company's expertise in
performing sophisticated analyses of complex, credit-based risks. The Company
expects that a significant portion of its growth will come from its expanding
specialty businesses.
Monoline financial guaranty insurers guaranty to the holders of debt
obligations, primarily those issued by municipalities, the full and timely
payment of principal and interest. In conducting its reinsurance business, the
Company assumes a portion of the risk insured, and receives a portion of the
premium collected, by the primary insurer. Reinsurance of financial guaranties
issued by monoline financial guaranty insurers represented 68.7% and 55.8% of
the Company's gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 1994 and
the six months ended June 30, 1995, respectively. During the year ended December
31, 1994, the Company received 35.5% of the total reinsurance premiums ceded by
all monoline financial guaranty insurers.
The Company's specialty businesses currently involve the issuance of direct
financial guaranties of smaller municipal and multi-family housing-backed debt
obligations, trade credit insurance, financial responsibility bonds and
excess-SIPC bonds. This area of the Company's business, measured by gross
premiums written, has grown from its inception in 1991 to represent over 44% of
the Company's gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 1995. The
Company is continuing to expand these businesses and is diversifying its
products and services into other areas that the Company believes have strong
growth potential and in which the Company's strength in credit analysis can
provide a competitive advantage.
The Company's business strategy is to concentrate its efforts on the
maintenance and growth of its financial guaranty business, both primary and
reinsurance, while maintaining its commitment to intensive and prudent credit
underwriting and conservative investment policies; to utilize its expertise in
underwriting credit risks to expand and develop its specialty businesses; and to
accelerate its diversification effort into other areas that the Company believes
have strong profit and growth potential.
The Company's aggregate insurance in force as of June 30, 1995 was $52.3
billion, of which $37.2 billion, or 71.1%, was attributable to reinsurance of
municipal bond obligations; $9.6 billion, or 18.4%, was attributable to
reinsurance of asset-backed debt obligations; and $5.5 billion, or 10.5%, was
attributable to specialty businesses.
As of June 30, 1995, the Company had total assets of $820 million and
shareholders' equity of $394 million. The Company had net income for the six
months ended June 30, 1994 and 1995 of $18.4 million and $21.6 million
(representing a 17.0% increase), respectively, and earnings per share for the
same respective periods of $1.02 and $1.24 (representing a 21.6% increase).
Of Enhance Financial's two principal insurance subsidiaries, Enhance
Reinsurance Company ("Enhance Re") has triple-A claims-paying ability ratings,
the highest rating, from Standard & Poor's Corporation ("Standard & Poor's"),
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") and Duff & Phelps Credit Rating
Company ("Duff & Phelps"), and Asset Guaranty Insurance Company ("Asset
Guaranty" and, together with Enhance Re, the "Insurance Subsidiaries") has
triple-A and double-A claims-paying ability ratings from Duff & Phelps and
Standard & Poor's, respectively. The Company's principal executive offices are
located at 335 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10017 and its telephone number
is (212) 983-3100.
4
<PAGE>
THE OFFERING OF THE DECS
This Prospectus relates to 4,900,000 shares of Common Stock, plus up to an
additional 530,800 shares solely to cover over-allotments, which may be
delivered by U S WEST or an affiliate thereof, at U S WEST's option, pursuant to
the terms of the DECS, which are being offered by U S WEST pursuant to the DECS
Prospectus. Such 5,430,800 shares of Common Stock are owned by U S WEST
Financial Services, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of U S WEST
("USWFS"). For a description of the relationship between U S WEST and the
Company, see "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management"
and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
5
<PAGE>
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (1) 30,
----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1994(1) 1995
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:
Gross premiums written.................... $ 38,680 $ 57,619 $ 63,655 $ 89,788 $ 85,112 $ 47,122 $ 37,739
Net premiums written...................... 37,650 55,274 61,428 86,649 80,685 45,526 36,179
Premiums earned........................... 24,758 35,950 45,552 59,629 61,757 28,421 30,160
Net realized gains (losses) on sale of
investments.............................. 131 6,239 7,936 16,649 (5,829) (1,004) (539)
Net investment income (2)................. 22,176 26,792 29,806 32,214 38,225 18,467 21,165
Total revenues............................ 47,359 69,447 84,686 109,693 95,693 46,695 51,538
Income before income taxes................ 32,220 40,869 49,449 50,284 32,659 23,542 28,312
Net income................................ 25,060 32,436 37,617 37,974 26,565 18,445 21,574
Earnings per share........................ 1.60 1.85 2.07 2.09 1.49 1.02 1.24
Dividends per share....................... -- -- 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.16 0.18
SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS: (3)
Loss ratio................................ 9.1% 14.2% 20.4% 37.0% 37.0% 15.6% 15.5%
Expense ratio............................. 54.0 64.6 56.5 53.8 55.5 56.2 54.8
Combined ratio............................ 63.1 78.8 76.9 90.8 92.5 71.8 70.3
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF JUNE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, (1) 30,
----------------------------------------------------- -----------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Investments (4).............................. $ 356,170 $ 426,280 $ 490,777 $ 622,303 $ 639,888 $ 705,564
Total assets................................. 429,785 501,853 576,246 725,048 749,388 820,019
Deferred premium revenue..................... 146,717 166,112 181,988 209,008 227,883 233,935
Total liabilities............................ 176,501 213,778 244,101 360,581 389,127 426,427
Total shareholders' equity................... 253,284 288,075 332,145 364,467 360,261 393,592
Book value per share......................... 14.46 16.46 18.29 20.14 20.45 22.80
STATUTORY BASIS RESERVES: (5)
Contingency reserves......................... $ 30,321 $ 43,269 $ 58,494 $ 79,404 $ 98,554 $ 108,444
Policyholders' surplus....................... 167,158 200,221 219,624 299,984 287,629 293,937
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
Qualified statutory capital.................. 197,479 243,490 278,118 379,388 386,183 402,381
Unearned premiums............................ 167,040 190,724 212,613 242,996 269,832 280,585
Losses and LAE reserves...................... 2,944 7,995 14,847 5,835 19,535 19,464
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
Total policyholders' reserves................ $ 367,463 $ 442,209 $ 505,578 $ 628,219 $ 675,550 $ 702,430
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
Leverage ratio (6)........................... 139:1 134:1 128:1 108:1 124:1 130:1
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
(1) Certain of the 1994 and prior years' amounts have been reclassified to
conform to the 1995 presentation.
(2) Excludes capital gains and losses.
(3) The loss ratio is derived by dividing losses and loss adjustment expenses
incurred by premiums earned. The expense ratio is derived by dividing
underwriting and operating expenses by premiums earned. The combined ratio
is the sum of the loss and expense ratios. Such ratios have been calculated
using amounts determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles ("GAAP").
(4) Excludes investments in affiliates.
(5) Represents the combined statutory financial position of the Insurance
Subsidiaries.
(6) Leverage ratio is net insurance in force divided by qualified statutory
capital.
6
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
CLAIMS-PAYING ABILITY RATINGS
In the financial guaranty insurance and reinsurance industries, the rating
agencies (consisting of Duff & Phelps, Fitch Investors Service, Inc., Moody's
and Standard & Poor's), periodically evaluate insurers and reinsurers to confirm
that they continue to meet the criteria established by such rating agencies for
maintaining their claims-paying ability ratings. Although the Company intends to
continue to comply with the criteria of Duff & Phelps, Standard & Poor's and
Moody's, the rating agencies which currently rate Enhance Re, and Duff & Phelps
and Standard & Poor's, the rating agencies which currently rate Asset Guaranty,
no assurance can be given that one or more of such rating agencies will not
downgrade or withdraw their claims-paying ability ratings of either Insurance
Subsidiary in the future. The Company's ability to compete with other financial
guaranty reinsurers, and consequently its results of operations, would be
materially adversely affected by any downgrade in either Insurance Subsidiary's
ratings. Moreover, several treaties to which either Insurance Subsidiary is a
party grant the respective primary insurers the right to recapture business
previously ceded to such Insurance Subsidiary should it suffer a downgrade of a
specified magnitude in its claims-paying ability rating. Such recapture of
previously ceded contracts would materially adversely affect the Company's
deferred premium revenue and its recognition of future income therefrom. See
"Business -- Rating Agencies."
The claims-paying ability ratings assigned by the rating agencies to a
reinsurance or insurance company are based upon factors relevant to
policyholders and are not directed toward the protection of investors. Such a
rating is neither a rating of securities nor a recommendation to buy, hold or
sell any security.
ADEQUACY OF LOSS RESERVES
The Insurance Subsidiaries are required to maintain reserves in amounts
sufficient to pay their estimated ultimate liability for losses and loss
adjustment expenses ("LAE"). Because of the absence of an actuarially
significant number of losses in its financial guaranty reinsurance activities,
and in the financial guaranty industry generally, the Company does not consider
traditional actuarial approaches used in the property/casualty industry
applicable to the determination of loss reserves for financial guaranty
insurers. The Company establishes reserves for losses and LAE based upon its
best estimate of specific and non-specific losses, including expenses associated
with the settlement of such losses, on its insured and reinsured obligations.
The Company establishes a reserve for losses and related LAE when a provision
for such losses and related LAE is reported by a primary insurer or when, in the
Company's opinion, an insured risk is in default or a default is probable and
the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable based on an analysis of
individual insured risks. From the commencement of its operations in 1986
through June 30, 1995, the Company incurred $67.3 million in losses and LAE, of
which the Company paid approximately $39.1 million through that date. As of June
30, 1995, the Company's reserves for losses and LAE were $28.2 million, compared
to $26.7 million as of December 31, 1994.
Reserves established by the Company for losses and LAE are necessarily based
on estimates, and, although the Company believes its reserves will prove to be
adequate, there can be no assurance thereof.
COMPETITION
In its financial guaranty reinsurance business, the Company is subject to
direct competition from only one U.S. company that specializes in the
reinsurance of financial guaranties, which, together with the Company, provide
most of the reinsurance available for monoline financial guaranty insurers,
particularly with respect to facultative reinsurance. However, several foreign
insurers and reinsurers compete with the Company on both treaty and facultative
bases in providing reinsurance for municipal and asset-backed transactions.
Certain of these foreign insurers and reinsurers are companies with which some
of the U.S. primary financial guaranty insurers have formed strategic alliances.
In addition, the Company also competes to a certain extent with banks, other
financial institutions and governmental institutions that issue letters of
credit, guaranties and other forms of credit enhancement. In its specialty
7
<PAGE>
businesses, Company believes that there are a number of direct competitors, some
of which have greater financial and other resources than the Company. Increased
competition, either in terms of price or in terms of new entrants into the
financial guaranty market or the Company's specialty markets, may have an
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. See "Business --
Competition."
CONCENTRATION OF CLIENTS
In its principal business of reinsuring financial guaranties issued by
monoline financial guaranty insurers, the Company derives substantially all of
its premium revenues from seven primary insurer clients. For the year ended
December 31, 1994 and for the six months ended June 30, 1995, two primary
insurers accounted for 23% and 23% and 20% and 18%, respectively, of the
Company's gross premiums written. No other single customer accounted for greater
than 10% of the Company's gross premiums written in these periods. A substantial
reduction in the amount of insurance ceded by one or more of the Company's
principal clients, without a commensurate increase in the amount of insurance
ceded by one or more of the Company's other insurer clients, would have a
material adverse effect on the Company's gross premiums written. Such reduction
could eventually have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations. See "Business -- Sources of Premiums."
MARKET AND OTHER FACTORS
The demand for financial guaranty insurance, and therefore the demand for
primary insurance and reinsurance provided by the Company, depends upon many
factors, which are generally beyond the control of the Company, including
prevailing interest rates, investor concern regarding the credit quality of
municipalities and corporations, investor perception of the strength of
financial guaranty providers and the guaranty offered, premium rates charged for
the insurance and the availability of other forms of credit enhancement.
Prevailing interest rate levels affect demand for financial guaranty
insurance to the extent that lower interest rates are accompanied by narrower
spreads between insured and uninsured obligations. The purchase of insurance
during periods of relatively narrower interest rate spreads will generally
provide lower cost savings to the issuer than during periods of relatively wider
spreads. These lower cost savings generally are accompanied by corresponding
decreases in the demand for financial guaranty insurance and reinsurance.
However, relatively low interest rate levels may encourage the issuance of new,
or the refunding of existing, debt securities by companies and municipalities,
which may increase the demand for financial guaranty insurance and reinsurance.
Investor concern regarding municipal and corporate credit quality typically
results in an increase in demand by issuers for financial guaranties since
investors generally prefer to purchase higher rated investments during times of
economic stress. Generally all financial guarantors have triple-A claims-paying
ability ratings, and bonds insured by companies having such ratings are
themselves rated triple-A.
Investor perception of the strength of financial guaranty providers affects
demand since investors usually receive a lower interest rate on an insured bond
than an uninsured bond. Should a major financial guaranty insurer, or the
industry as a whole, have its claims-paying ability rating lowered, or suffer
for some other reason a deterioration in investor confidence, demand for
financial guaranty insurance may be reduced and possibly eliminated entirely.
Premium rates are affected by factors such as the primary insurer's
appraisal of the insured credit, the spread between the then prevailing general
interest rates on insured versus uninsured debt obligations, the level of
competition among primary insurers, the amount of municipal debt issuances and
the nature and mix of the insured credits.
In addition, financial guaranty insurance and reinsurance compete with other
forms of credit enhancement, such as letters of credit, as well as with the
issuer's alternative of foregoing credit enhancement altogether and paying
higher interest rates. Moreover, if the interest savings from insurance or other
forms of credit enhancement are not greater than the cost of such credit
enhancement, the issuer will generally choose to issue unenhanced debt
obligations.
8
<PAGE>
Additionally, the financial guaranty industry has historically been and will
continue to be subject to the direct and indirect effects of governmental
regulation, including changes in tax laws affecting the municipal and
asset-backed debt markets. See "Financial Guaranty Industry Overview --
Financial Guaranty Market." No assurance can be given that future legislative or
regulatory changes might not adversely affect the Company's results of
operations or the interests of the shareholders of Enhance Financial.
HOLDING COMPANY STRUCTURE
Enhance Financial conducts substantially all its operations through its
subsidiaries, principally the Insurance Subsidiaries. The financial condition
and cash flow of Enhance Financial and its attendant ability to pay dividends on
the Common Stock is dependant upon the earnings of the Insurance Subsidiaries
and the distribution of those earnings to Enhance Financial in the form of
dividends. The payment of dividends to Enhance Financial by the Insurance
Subsidiaries is subject to restrictions set forth in the New York Insurance Law
and the regulations thereunder (the "Insurance Law"). The payment of such
dividends may also be subject to other statutory or contractual restrictions, is
contingent upon the earnings of the Insurance Subsidiaries, and is subject to
various business considerations. As of June 30, 1995, up to $22.0 million was
available for the payment of dividends without the prior approval of the
insurance regulatory authorities to Enhance Financial by the Insurance
Subsidiaries for the payment of Enhance Financial's operating expenses,
principal and interest on its debt obligations, dividends to its shareholders,
if any, and the repurchase of Common Stock. See "Price Range of Common Stock and
Dividends," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources" and "Insurance
Regulatory Matters -- Restrictions on Dividends by the Insurance Subsidiaries."
SPECIALTY BUSINESSES
Specialty businesses have constituted, and the Company expects that they
will continue to constitute, a significant component of its business. In certain
of its specialty businesses, the Company underwrites with the anticipation of
higher loss levels than those experienced in connection with its reinsurance of
municipal and asset-backed debt obligations due to the nature of the risk
assumed or the limited history of the business. The Company believes that the
higher premiums it receives for such activities adequately compensate it for the
risks involved, since the Company takes into account expected higher loss ratios
in determining appropriate premium rates. See "Business -- Loss Experience."
Premiums in respect of certain of the Company's specialty businesses are
earned over a significantly shorter period that those in respect of the
Company's monoline reinsurance business. The Company's ability to realize
consistent levels of earned premiums in these specialty businesses will
therefore depend on its ability to write consistent levels of new insurance. See
"Business -- Specialty Businesses."
VOTING CONTROL
As of September 30, 1995, the two largest shareholders of Enhance Financial,
USWFS and Manufacturers Life Insurance Company ("Manufacturers Life"), together
owned approximately 46.4% of the Common Stock outstanding. The holders of Common
Stock do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of
directors, and, accordingly, any shareholder or group of shareholders holding
shares representing in excess of 50% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding
would by itself have the power to elect the entire board of directors. In
addition, a shareholders' agreement among Enhance Financial, USWFS and
Manufacturers Life (the "Shareholders' Agreement") requires that each of USWFS
and Manufacturers Life votes for the election of two designees of each of USWFS
and Manufacturers Life as directors of Enhance Financial. USWFS will continue to
vote the shares of Common Stock owned by it unless and until it delivers such
shares pursuant to the terms of the DECS or otherwise disposes of such shares.
As a result of the Shareholders' Agreement, USWFS and Manufacturers Life may be
deemed to constitute a control group of Enhance Financial pursuant to the
Exchange Act.
9
<PAGE>
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
As of September 30, 1995, the two largest shareholders of Enhance Financial,
USWFS and Manufacturers Life, together owned approximately 46.4% of the Common
Stock outstanding. U S WEST has the right to cause the delivery of the shares of
Common Stock owned by USWFS (representing 31.5% of the outstanding shares)
pursuant to the terms of the DECS. The shares of Common Stock owned by USWFS and
by Manufacturers Life (representing 14.9% of the outstanding shares) will
continue to be tradeable in the open market subject to the volume limitations,
manner of sale and notice requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act or
without such requirements or limitations through the exercise of registration
rights available under a registration rights agreement with Enhance Financial.
See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions -- Registration Rights
Agreement."
Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock in the public or private
market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect
prevailing market prices of the Common Stock.
It is not possible to predict accurately how or whether any market that
develops for the DECS will influence the market for the Common Stock. For
example, the price of the Common Stock could become more volatile and could be
depressed by investors' anticipation of the potential distribution into the
market of substantial additional amounts of Common Stock upon the maturity of
the DECS, by possible sales of Common Stock by investors who view the DECS as a
more attractive means of equity participation in Enhance Financial and by
hedging or arbitrage trading activity that may develop involving the DECS and
the Common Stock.
USE OF PROCEEDS
All of the shares of Common Stock to which this Prospectus relates may be
delivered by U S WEST, at its option, pursuant to the terms of the DECS, which
are being offered by U S WEST pursuant to the DECS Prospectus. Enhance Financial
will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the DECS or delivery
thereunder of the shares of Common Stock to which this Prospectus relates.
10
<PAGE>
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDENDS
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Common
Stock for the calendar quarters indicated as reported in the NYSE consolidated
transaction system:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SALES PRICES
------------------------ DIVIDENDS
HIGH LOW PAID
----------- ----------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1993
- -----
First Quarter............................................ $ 247/8 $ 171/2 $ 0.07
Second Quarter........................................... 235/8 191/2 0.07
Third Quarter............................................ 231/2 173/4 0.07
Fourth Quarter........................................... 22 183/4 0.07
1994
- -----
First Quarter............................................ $ 197/8 $ 181/8 $ 0.08
Second Quarter........................................... 193/8 173/8 0.08
Third Quarter............................................ 205/8 173/4 0.08
Fourth Quarter........................................... 193/8 151/2 0.08
1995
- -----
First Quarter............................................ $ 183/8 $ 157/8 $ 0.09
Second Quarter........................................... 195/8 161/4 0.09
Third Quarter............................................ 205/8 18 0.09
Fourth Quarter (through October 5, 1995)................. 203/4 201/4 --
</TABLE>
As of September 30, 1995, there were 135 holders of record of the Common
Stock and 17,235,625 shares outstanding.
Subsequent to the initial public offering of its Common Stock in 1992,
Enhance Financial has increased its dividend at the rate of $.04 per share per
year, and it paid a dividend in each of the first and second quarters of 1995 of
$.09 per share. The amount of dividends payable in the future will be reviewed
periodically by the board of directors in light of the Company's earnings,
financial condition and capital requirements. It is the policy of the board of
directors that the Company retain an adequate portion of its earnings to support
the growth of its business. The declaration and payment of dividends are subject
to the discretion of the board of directors of Enhance Financial, and there is
no requirement or assurance that dividends will be paid.
Enhance Financial's ability to pay dividends, as well as its operating, debt
service and other expenses, is dependent upon the ability of the Insurance
Subsidiaries to pay dividends to Enhance Financial and is subject to
restrictions contained in agreements relating to Enhance Financial's
indebtedness. The Insurance Subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends to Enhance
Financial is subject to restrictions contained in the Insurance Law. The Company
expects that such restrictions will not affect the ability of the Insurance
Subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support the payment of
dividends by Enhance Financial consistent with the practice adopted in recent
years. As of June 30, 1995, up to $22.0 million was available for the payment of
dividends without the prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities to
Enhance Financial by the Insurance Subsidiaries. See "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and
Capital Resources" and "Insurance Regulatory Matters -- Restrictions on
Dividends by the Insurance Subsidiaries."
11
<PAGE>
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Company as of June
30, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, 1995
--------------
<S> <C>
(IN THOUSANDS)
Liabilities
Long-term debt.................................................................................. $ 79,800
Shareholders' Equity
Common Stock -- $.10 par value 30,000,000 shares authorized; 18,285,475 shares issued;
17,265,600 shares outstanding.................................................................. 1,828
Additional paid-in capital...................................................................... 192,591
Retained earnings............................................................................... 212,664
Unearned compensation/excess pension liability.................................................. (180)
Unrealized gains................................................................................ 3,886
Treasury stock.................................................................................. (17,197)
--------------
Total shareholders' equity.................................................................... 393,592
--------------
Total capitalization........................................................................ $ 473,392
--------------
--------------
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE>
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial
information derived from the historical consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December
31, 1994 and as of and for the six months ended June 30, 1994 and 1995. This
information should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated
financial statements of the Company and the related notes thereto and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations." The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be expected for the full year.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (1) 30,
------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1994 (1) 1995
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA:
Gross premiums written.......... $ 38,680 $ 57,619 $ 63,655 $ 89,788 $ 85,112 $ 47,122 $ 37,739
Net premiums written............ 37,650 55,274 61,428 86,649 80,685 45,526 36,179
Premiums earned................. 24,758 35,950 45,552 59,629 61,757 28,421 30,160
Net realized gains (losses) on
sale of investments............ 131 6,239 7,936 16,649 (5,829) (1,004 ) (539 )
Net investment income (2)....... 22,176 26,792 29,806 32,214 38,225 18,467 21,165
Total revenues.................. 47,359 69,447 84,686 109,693 95,693 46,695 51,538
Income before income taxes...... 32,220 40,869 49,449 50,284 32,659 23,542 28,312
Net income...................... 25,060 32,436 37,617 37,974 26,565 18,445 21,574
Earnings per share.............. 1.60 1.85 2.07 2.09 1.49 1.02 1.24
Dividends per share............. -- -- 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.16 0.18
SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS: (3)
Loss ratio...................... 9.1% 14.2% 20.4% 37.0% 37.0 % 15.6 % 15.5 %
Expense ratio................... 54.0 64.6 56.5 53.8 55.5 56.2 54.8
Combined ratio.................. 63.1 78.8 76.9 90.8 92.5 71.8 70.3
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF JUNE
AS OF DECEMBER 31, (1) 30,
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Investments (4)...................... $ 356,170 $ 426,280 $ 490,777 $ 622,303 $ 639,888 $ 705,564
Total assets......................... 429,785 501,853 576,246 725,048 749,388 820,019
Deferred premium revenue............. 146,717 166,112 181,988 209,008 227,883 233,935
Total liabilities.................... 176,501 213,778 244,101 360,581 389,127 426,427
Total shareholders' equity........... 253,284 288,075 332,145 364,467 360,261 393,592
Book value per share................. 14.46 16.46 18.29 20.14 20.45 22.80
STATUTORY BASIS RESERVES: (5)
Contingency reserves................. $ 30,321 $ 43,269 $ 58,494 $ 79,404 $ 98,554 $ 108,444
Policyholders' surplus............... 167,158 200,221 219,624 299,984 287,629 293,937
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Qualified statutory capital.......... 197,479 243,490 278,118 379,388 386,183 402,381
Unearned premiums.................... 167,040 190,724 212,613 242,996 269,832 280,585
Losses and LAE reserves.............. 2,944 7,995 14,847 5,835 19,535 19,464
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Total policyholders' reserves........ $ 367,463 $ 442,209 $ 505,578 $ 628,219 $ 675,550 $ 702,430
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Leverage ratio (6)................... 139:1 134:1 128:1 108:1 124:1 130:1
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
<FN>
- --------------------------
(1) Certain of the 1994 and prior years' amounts have been reclassified to
conform to the 1995 presentation.
(2) Excludes capital gains and losses.
(3) The loss ratio is derived by dividing losses and LAE incurred by premiums
earned. The expense ratio is derived by dividing underwriting and operating
expenses by premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and
expense ratios. Such ratios have been calculated using amounts determined
in accordance with GAAP.
(4) Excludes investment in affiliates.
(5) Represents the combined statutory financial position of the Insurance
Subsidiaries.
(6) Leverage ratio is net insurance in force divided by qualified statutory
capital.
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
The Company is principally engaged in the reinsurance of financial
guaranties of municipal and asset-backed debt obligations of monoline financial
guaranty insurers. Monoline financial guaranty insurers guaranty to the holders
of debt obligations, primarily those issued by municipalities, the full and
timely payment of principal and interest. In conducting its reinsurance
business, the Company assumes a portion of the risk insured, and receives a
portion of the premium collected, by the primary insurer. In addition, the
Company is engaged in the insurance and reinsurance of various specialty
businesses that utilize the Company's expertise in performing sophisticated
analyses of complex, credit-based risks. The Company's specialty businesses
currently involve the issuance of direct financial guaranties of smaller
municipal and multi-family housing-backed debt obligations, trade credit
insurance, financial responsibility bonds and excess-SIPC bonds. The Company
expects that a significant portion of its growth will come from its expanding
specialty businesses.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1995 VERSUS SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1994
Gross premiums written during the six months ended June 30, 1995 were $37.7
million compared to $47.1 million in the same period in 1994, representing a
19.9% decrease. This decrease was principally attributable to a substantial
decline in the municipal reinsurance business reflecting the continuing
industry-wide slow down in new-issue municipal bond and refunding volume.
In the first six months of 1995 new-issue volume of $69.2 billion was
recorded, a 25.4% decrease from the same period in 1994. However, the insured
portion of such new issues increased to 39% compared to 37% for all of 1994.
Total municipal bond refundings in the first six months of 1995 decreased to 17%
of new-issue volume from 32% in the first half of 1994, reflecting higher
interest rates during the 1995 period which tended to reduce refunding activity
to a more normal level.
Facultative activity contributed $11.6 million in premiums in the first half
of 1995 compared to $23.8 million for the same period in 1994.
The principal amount of debt obligations insured and reinsured by the
Company aggregated $5.1 billion for the first half of 1995 compared to $4.4
billion for the same period in 1994. This period-to-period increase was achieved
despite an industry-wide decline in new-issue municipal bond and refunding
volume and resulted in large part from the continued high levels of premiums
derived from the Company's specialty businesses. These businesses accounted for
$2.4 billion of the principal insured in the first half of 1995 compared to $1.5
billion in the first half of 1994.
Net premiums written decreased 20.5% to $36.2 million in the first half of
1995 from $45.5 million in the same period in 1994, consistent with the decrease
in gross premiums discussed in the preceding paragraphs. Of the Company's net
premiums written in the first half of 1995, 48.3%, 8.2% and 43.5% were derived
from the reinsurance of municipal bonds, the reinsurance of asset-backed debt
obligations and the Company's specialty businesses, respectively, compared to
63.6%. 7.7% and 28.7% during the same period in 1994.
Premiums earned grew 6.1% to $30.2 million in the first half of 1995 from
$28.4 million during the comparable period in 1994. This increase reflects the
growth in earned premiums derived from the Company's specialty businesses which
contributed $11.8 million of earned premiums in the first half of 1995, compared
to $7.9 million in the comparable 1994 period, as well as the earnings generated
from the growing deferred premium revenue balance. Deferred premium revenue was
$228 million at the beginning of 1995 compared to $209 million at the beginning
of 1994.
The growth in earned premiums was in part offset by a lower level of
refundings in the period which accounted for an estimated $1.6 million of earned
premiums in the first half of 1995 versus $5.1 million in the first half of
1994.
14
<PAGE>
Net investment income increased 14.6% to $21.2 million in the first six
months of 1995 from $18.5 million in the first half of 1994. This growth
resulted primarily from the Company's ability to invest substantially all of its
available cash flow in higher yielding special private placements without
lowering the credit quality of the portfolio. The increase further reflects the
growth in the Company's investment portfolio during the period. The average
yields on the Company's investment portfolio after all associated costs were
6.7% and 5.9% for the first half of 1995 and 1994, respectively. In addition,
the Company realized $0.5 million of net capital losses in the first half of
1995 compared with $1.0 million in the 1994 first half.
Net investment income is presented after deduction of both external
investment management fees and internal costs associated with managing the
portfolio.
Incurred losses and LAE were $4.7 million in the first six months of 1995
compared to $4.4 million in the same period in 1994. Of the 1995 amount, $2.8
million derives from the Company's credit reinsurance business, which is written
with the expectation of a loss ratio of approximately 40%.
The Company's operating expense ratio decreased to 54.8% in the first six
months of 1995 from 56.2% in the same period in 1994. Policy acquisition costs
("PAC") were $11.1 million and $9.1 million for the first half of 1995 and 1994,
respectively, representing 36.8% and 32.2% of premiums earned in those
respective periods. The Company effected an internal management reorganization
in the first quarter of 1995 to streamline its operations, among other things.
This resulted, in part, in revised expense allocations which, in turn,
contributed in large part to the increase in PAC.
Other operating expenses decreased 11.4% to $5.3 million in the first half
of 1995 from $6.0 million during the same period in 1994. This decrease resulted
primarily from the revised expense allocations noted above, including the
allocation of internal investment management expenses to investment income.
Interest expense totaled $2.7 million in the first six months of 1995
compared to $2.9 million for the same period in 1994. The decrease reflects the
impact of a reverse interest-rate swap entered into in January 1995 and
subsequently terminated in June 1995 and from which the Company realized a net
interest reduction in the period of $0.4 million, including amortization of gain
on termination of the swap. This reduction was offset in part by additional
interest expense on the increased drawdowns on the Company's line of credit
under a bank credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement").
The Company's effective tax rate for the first six months of 1995 was 23.8%
compared to 21.6% for the 1994 comparable period. The 1994 rate reflects the tax
benefit derived from higher capital losses.
During the six months ended June 30, 1995, the Company's net income
increased 17.0% to $21.6 million from $18.4 million in the first six months of
1994 reflecting increases in premiums earned and investment income and lower
total expenses. During the six months ended June 30, 1995, earnings per share
increased 21.1% to $1.24 per share from $1.02 per share for the first half of
1994, while operating earnings per share, which excludes the impact of capital
losses, increased 17.5% to $1.24 from $1.06 per share in the first half of 1994.
The per-share increases also reflect the lower weighted average shares during
the 1995 period resulting from the Company's share repurchase program.
The weighted average shares outstanding during the first half of 1995 was
17.4 million compared to 18.0 million for the 1994 comparable period. The
Company repurchased 362,000 and 471,300 of its shares of Common Stock in the
open market in the first six months of 1995 and at various times throughout
1994, respectively.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 VERSUS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993
Gross premiums written in 1994 were $85.1 million compared to $89.8 million
in 1993, a 5.2% decrease. This decline primarily reflects the significantly
lower municipal debt new-issue volume, a slowdown in refunding activity and
lower premium rates on certain high quality assumed reinsurance, all of which
was in large part offset by continued growth in premiums derived from the
Company's specialty businesses. Facultative activity contributed $34.7 million
of monoline reinsurance gross premiums in
15
<PAGE>
1994 compared to $40.1 million in 1993. Additionally, municipal reinsurance
premiums written benefited from the grant by Standard & Poor's of a double-A
claims-paying ability rating to Asset Guaranty in the latter half of 1993.
Municipal reinsurance premiums written by Asset Guaranty were $4.8 million in
1994 compared to $1.5 million in 1993.
The principal amount of debt obligations insured and reinsured by the
Company aggregated $7.1 billion in 1994 compared with $6.7 billion in 1993, a 7%
increase. This year-to-year increase was achieved despite an industry-wide slow
down in new-issue municipal bond and refunding volume and resulted in large part
from the continued high levels of premiums derived from the Company's specialty
businesses. These businesses accounted for $26.6 million (31.3%) of gross
premiums in 1994 compared to $19.8 million (22.0%) in 1993.
The volume of municipal bonds issued in 1994, $164.9 billion, represented a
decline of 44% from the $292.0 billion in issuances in the prior year. This
decline was due to the substantial and rapid increase in interest rates, which
caused a reduction in refunding issues such that they represented only 23% of
total issuance compared to 51% in 1993. The Company believes that this reduced
level of refundings is a more normal and sustainable level. Bonds issued for new
money purposes, however, increased to $116.0 billion in 1994 from the 1993 level
of $97.0 billion. The insured portion of new issues was 37% in both years.
Net premiums written decreased 6.9% to $80.7 million in 1994 from $86.6
million in 1993, consistent with the decrease in gross premiums discussed in the
preceding paragraphs. Of the Company's net premiums written in 1994, 59%, 11%
and 30% were derived from the reinsurance of municipal bonds, the reinsurance of
asset-backed debt obligations and the Company's specialty businesses,
respectively, compared to 72%, 7% and 21% in 1993.
Net premiums written from specialty businesses have grown from $8.6 million
(16%) in 1991 to $24.6 million (30%) in 1994. The Company expects that these
specialty businesses will continue to contribute a significant component of the
Company's revenues. In connection with certain of its specialty businesses, the
Company underwrites with the anticipation of higher loss levels than those
associated with its core municipal and asset-backed reinsurance business. The
Company takes these higher loss ratios into account in determining appropriate
premium rates.
Premiums earned grew 3.6% to $61.8 million in 1994 from $59.6 million in
1993. This increase was achieved despite the decrease in premiums written and a
lower level of refundings in 1994. The growth reflects the increased
contribution to earned premiums derived from the Company's specialty businesses,
which contributed $18.9 million (31%) of earned premiums in 1994 compared to
$13.1 million (22%) in 1993. This growth in earned premiums was to a large
degree offset by the lower level of refundings, which accounted for an estimated
$11.7 million of earned premiums in 1994 compared with $14.4 million in 1993. A
refunding eliminates the Company's reinsurance exposure to the refunded
obligation, and, as a result, the Company recognizes in current earnings the
remaining related deferred premium revenue. The growth in premiums earned also
reflects the amortization of the growing deferred premium revenue balance, which
increased to $228 million at year-end 1994 from $209 million at year-end 1993.
Net investment income increased 18.7% to $38.2 million in 1994 from $32.2
million for 1993. This growth resulted primarily from the Company's ability to
invest substantially all of its available cash flow in higher yielding special
private placements without lowering the credit quality of the portfolio.
Substantially all of these special assets have received a double-A rating. The
increase further reflects the growth in the Company's investment portfolio from
$633 million at December 31, 1993 to $655 million at December 31, 1994. The
average yields on the Company's investment portfolio increased to 6.2% for 1994
from 5.8% for 1993.
In addition, the Company realized $5.8 million of net capital losses in 1994
compared with net realized capital gains of $16.6 million in 1993. This
year-to-year change reflects the rapid increase in interest rates during 1994.
16
<PAGE>
Incurred losses and LAE were $22.8 million in 1994 compared to $22.1 million
in the same period in 1993. Of these amounts, losses and LAE incurred in
connection with the Company's discontinued commercial real estate related
portfolio aggregated $9.5 million in 1994 compared to $13.1 million in 1993.
In 1991 and 1992, the Company established reserves aggregating $9.8 million
in connection with three transactions for which the Company was a reinsurer of
financial guaranties of securities backed by pools of commercial real estate. In
1993, in connection with the refinancing of these three transactions and with a
resulting reduction in exposure, the Company paid losses of approximately $20
million, including the remaining balance of amounts previously reserved, and
thereby incurred additional losses and LAE of $12.9 million.
In 1994, following notification from the primary insurer, the Company
increased its case reserves on these refinanced transactions by $7.1 million. In
addition, in 1994 the Company established case reserves of $2.4 million on two
additional transactions in its commercial real estate portfolio. Of these
additions to case reserves, $7.5 million were established by transfer from the
Company's non-specific reserve, thereby depleting that reserve. Following
re-evaluation of all of its potential exposures, the Company increased its
non-specific reserve to $10 million at year end 1994. Net additions to the
Company's non-specific reserve in 1994 and 1993 were $3.6 million and $5.6
million, respectively.
In addition, in 1994 and 1993, the Company incurred losses of $5.7 million
and $3.7 million, respectively, in connection with its credit and surety
businesses commensurate with the continued growth in premiums written from these
specialty businesses.
The Company believes that the reserves for losses and LAE, including the
case and non-specific reserves, are adequate to cover the ultimate net cost of
claims. However, the reserves are necessarily based on estimates, and there can
be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not exceed such estimates.
The Company's operating expense ratio was 56.7% in 1994 compared to 54.9% in
1993. PACs, which are those costs which vary with and are directly related to
the generation of new and renewal premium, totaled $20.3 million and $19.6
million in 1994 and 1993, respectively, representing 32.8% and 32.9% of premiums
earned in those respective periods. Other operating expenses increased to $13.2
million in 1994 from $11.6 million in 1993 due in part to $0.5 million in
non-recurring expenses in 1994.
Interest expense of $5.8 million was recorded in 1994 compared to $5.2
million in 1993. The 1994 expense includes a full year's interest charge on
Enhance Financial's $75 million aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Debentures
due 2003 (the "6.75% Debentures"), which were issued in March 1993.
The Company's effective tax rate was 18.6% for 1994 compared to 24.5% in
1993. The 1994 rate reflects the benefit from capital losses incurred in 1994
which may be carried back to recover taxes paid on prior years' capital gains.
The 1993 charge includes $0.95 million for the retroactive increase in the
deferred tax liability as at December 31, 1992, resulting from an increase in
1993 in the corporate tax rate to 35%.
Net income for 1994 decreased 30.0% to $26.6 million from $38.0 million in
1993. This decrease primarily reflects the after tax impact of the $22.5 million
swing in realized capital gains. Earnings per share declined similarly by 29.0%
to $1.49 in 1994 from $2.09 for 1993.
The weighted average shares outstanding for 1994 was 17.88 million compared
to 18.14 million for 1993. The Company continued its share repurchase program in
1994 and repurchased 471,300 of its shares of Common Stock on the open market at
various times throughout the year. Through December 31, 1994, the Company
repurchased 620,200 shares of Common Stock out of a total number of shares
authorized by the board of directors of 1.2 million.
17
<PAGE>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 VERSUS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1992
Gross premiums written in 1993 were $89.8 million compared with $63.7
million in 1992, an increase of 41.0%. This growth reflects an increase in
facultative writings during the period and the continued strength of the
municipal bond market. Facultative activity contributed $39.2 million of
monoline reinsurance premiums in 1993 compared to $16.8 million in 1992.
The principal amount of debt obligations insured and reinsured by the
Company aggregated $6.7 billion for 1993 compared with $4.0 billion in 1992, an
increase of 64.9%. This increase was primarily attributable to a 75.4%
year-to-year increase in par insured derived from the Company's municipal
reinsurance business, which benefited from continued increases in the volume of
municipal debt obligations issued and insured.
In 1993, industry new-issue volume of $292.0 billion was recorded, an
increase of 24.3% over 1992. The insured portion of such new issues was 37.1%
compared with 34.5% in 1992. Total municipal bond refundings in 1993 accounted
for almost 65.9% of new-issue volume, up from 52.2% for 1992 reflecting the
continued low interest rates during the year.
The increase in gross premiums was further impacted by the continued growth
in the Company's specialty insurance and reinsurance businesses which in 1993
accounted for $19.8 million of gross premiums written compared with $17.1
million in 1992.
Net premiums written increased 41.0% to $86.6 million in 1993 from $61.4
million in 1992, consistent with the increase in gross premiums discussed in the
preceding paragraphs. Of the Company's net premiums written in 1993, 71.7%, 7.1%
and 21.2% were derived from the reinsurance of municipal bonds, the reinsurance
of asset-backed debt obligations and the Company's specialty businesses,
respectively, compared to 60.6%, 13.6% and 25.8% during 1992.
Premiums earned grew 30.9% to $59.6 million in 1993 from $45.6 million in
1992. This increase is due in large measure to the higher level of refundings,
which accounted for an estimated $14.4 million of 1993 earned premiums compared
with $8.4 million in 1992, as well as the earnings generated from the
amortization of the growing balance of deferred premium revenue.
Net investment income increased 8.3% to $32.2 million in 1993 from $29.8
million in 1992. During the year, the investment portfolio grew from $499
million to $633 million including the net proceeds of approximately $74 million
from Enhance Financial's sale of the 6.75% Debentures in March 1993. The average
yields on the Company's investment portfolio were 5.8% and 6.5% for 1993 and
1992, respectively. This decrease in yield reflects the general market decline
in interest rates and the Company's strategy of seeking maximum total rate of
return from its investment portfolio. The portfolio is managed externally by
professional advisors whose performance is measured against established indexes;
yield from interest income, as well as realized and unrealized gains, are the
key components of such performance. In 1993, the total rate of return of the
portfolio on this basis was 10.9%.
In addition, the Company generated $16.6 million of realized capital gains
in 1993 compared with $7.9 million in 1992. The high levels of realized gains
reflects the effect of lower interest rates, which served to increase the
realized gains on sales of investments in both years.
Incurred losses and LAE were $22.1 million in 1993 compared to $9.3 million
in 1992. The 1993 amount includes a $12.9 million charge in connection with the
refinancing of three transactions for which the Company was a reinsurer of
financial guaranties of securities backed by pools of commercial real estate. In
connection with the refinancings, the Company paid losses of approximately $20
million, including amounts previously reserved, and the Company's exposure was
reduced correspondingly. The increase in paid losses over reserves already
established for these transactions resulted primarily from decreases in
projected operating cash flows from, and sales prices of, certain of the
underlying properties based on updated appraisals. In addition, certain
recoveries under guaranties provided in connection with the original reinsured
transaction were determined by the primary insurer to have been overvalued. At
December 31, 1993, the Company's total principal outstanding with respect to the
three
18
<PAGE>
refinanced reinsured transactions was $63.5 million. Additionally, the 1993
incurred losses include net additions of approximately $4 million to the
non-specific reserve, bringing the reserve at year-end 1993 to approximately $5
million.
Of the Company's total insured principal of $21.9 billion at December 31,
1993, $16.2 billion, $4.2 billion and $1.5 billion represented exposure with
respect to reinsurance of municipal debt obligations, the reinsurance of
asset-backed obligations and the Company's specialty businesses, respectively.
Of the $4.2 billion related to asset-backed obligations, 60.3% related to
consumer receivables, 19.5% related to investor-owned utilities and 7.4% related
to commercial real estate exposure (representing 1.4% of total principal
outstanding).
The Company's operating expense ratio declined to 54.9% in 1993 from 57.6%
in 1992, reflecting increased economies of scale. Although operating expenses
increased, the expense ratio declined principally as a result of the increase in
earned premiums generated from refundings. PACs were $19.6 million and $14.5
million for 1993 and 1992, respectively, representing 32.9% and 31.9% of
premiums earned in those respective periods. This year-to-year increase
reflects, in part, the increase in premiums earned, as well as a revision in the
amounts of certain internal costs being deferred. Other operating expenses
increased 5.9% to $11.6 million in 1993 from $10.9 million in 1992. This
increase is due in part to growth in the Company's operations, as well as
increased occupancy and overhead costs following the Company's relocation in
June 1992 and offset in part by the deferral of additional internal costs.
Interest expense totaled $5.2 million in 1993 compared to $0.8 million in
1992, reflecting the sale by Enhance Financial of the 6.75% Debentures issued in
March 1993.
The Company's effective tax rate for 1993 was 24.5% compared to 23.9% for
1992 reflecting the increase in the corporate tax rate in 1993 to 35%.
Additionally, the 1993 tax charge includes $0.95 million for the retroactive
increase in the deferred tax liability as at December 31, 1992 resulting from
the increase in the corporate tax rate.
The Company's 1993 net income increased 1.0% to $38.0 million from $37.6
million in 1992. Earnings per share for 1993 grew 1.0% to $2.09 per share from
$2.07 per share in 1992. These increases were due to the continued growth of
premiums earned and investment income and offset by the significant increase in
incurred losses in 1993 discussed above as well as the change in the Federal
income tax rate.
The weighted average shares outstanding for the year 1993 was 18.14 million
compared to 18.13 million for 1992. This increase reflects the impact of Enhance
Financial's initial public offering in February 1992, in which 750,000 shares of
Common Stock were sold, and offset in part by the repurchase of 64,200 and
84,700 shares on the open market in 1993 and 1992, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As a holding company, Enhance Financial finances the payment of its
operating expenses, principal and interest on its debt obligations, dividends to
its shareholders, if any, and the repurchase of Common Stock from dividends and
other payments from its subsidiaries, principally the Insurance Subsidiaries,
and draws on the line of credit provided under the Credit Agreement. As of June
30, 1995, up to $22.0 million was available for the payment of dividends without
prior approval of the insurance regulating authorities from the Insurance
Subsidiaries for the aforesaid purposes. See "Insurance Regulatory Matters --
Restrictions on Dividends by the Insurance Subsidiaries."
The Company maintains the Credit Agreement with two major commercial banks
providing for borrowings of up to $30 million to be used for general corporate
purposes, the availability of which is subject to the satisfaction by the
Company of certain tests. As of June 30, 1995, the outstanding balance was $12.0
million and an additional $8.0 million was available under the Credit Agreement.
Of the $12.0 million outstanding, $9.0 million was borrowed during the first
quarter of 1995; to finance Enhance Financial's stock repurchase program and to
contribute $3 million to Asset Guaranty. Under the terms of
19
<PAGE>
the Credit Agreement, no additional amounts may be borrowed after November 9,
1995. The Company and its lead bank are currently negotiating with respect to an
amendment to the Credit Agreement, which would provide the Company with
additional borrowing availability (up to the existing $30 million limit). There
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to enter into such an amended
Credit Agreement, although the Company does not believe that the failure to
enter into an amendment to the Credit Agreement will have a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations.
Payments of dividends by Enhance Financial to its shareholders are further
restricted by the terms of agreements relating to its indebtedness. As of June
30, 1995, the maximum amount of dividends which may be paid by Enhance Financial
to its shareholders in compliance with the terms of such indebtedness was $23.1
million.
The Company's cash flow from operations for the first six months of 1995 was
$32.9 million compared to $31.2 million for the same period in 1994. The
Company's investment portfolio, excluding investments in affiliates, grew to
$706 million at June 30, 1995 from $640 million at December 31, 1994, including
adjustments due to market value. The Company believes that the operating
liquidity needs of the Insurance Subsidiaries can be funded exclusively from
their respective operating cash flows. The Company's cash flow from operations
consists principally of insurance and reinsurance premiums collected and income
earned on invested assets, which in turn is applied to the payment of claims,
operating expenses and income taxes. Liquidity is also provided by the Company's
sales of its available-for-sale portfolio investments prior to maturity and
payments of principal on investments at maturity. Sales of investments prior to
maturity occur periodically, at the discretion of the Company's investment
managers, typically to realign portions of the investment portfolio in
accordance with the Company's objectives relating to average maturity and
quality and to achieve the optimal mix of taxable and tax-exempt securities. In
1994 and for the first six months of 1995, the Company's non-operating cash
outflows were invested almost exclusively in high quality, fixed-maturity,
private placement securities.
Based on the historical cash flow of the Company, the Company's current
financial results and the Company's expectation as to the level of the Company's
net premiums written during the next 12 months, the Company believes that cash
flow provided by operating activities of the Insurance Subsidiaries over the
next year will provide sufficient liquidity for the operations of the Company,
as well as funds to Enhance Financial so that Enhance Financial will be able to
meet its debt service and other obligations. The ability of Enhance Financial to
meet its debt service and other obligations beyond the next 12 months will
depend upon the cash flow generated by the operating activities of the Insurance
Subsidiaries and the availability to Enhance Financial of sufficient amounts of
funds from the Insurance Subsidiaries in the form of dividends or other
payments. Beyond the next 12 months, the Company's cash flow available to
Enhance Financial may be influenced by a variety of factors, including market
changes, insurance regulatory changes and changes in general economic
conditions. Consequently, although the Company presently anticipates that it
will be able to meet all debt service and other obligations over the long term,
no assurance can be given as to whether the available net cash provided by the
Company's operating activities will provide sufficient liquidity for Enhance
Financial to meet all its long-term liquidity needs.
At December 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994, the carrying value of the Company's
investments was $491 million, $622 million, and $640 million, respectively, on
which was earned $30.3 million, $32.8 million and $38.2 million in 1992, 1993
and 1994, respectively, excluding $7.9 million, $16.6 million and $(5.8) million
of net realized gains (losses) in 1992, 1993 and 1994, respectively. The
increase in investments resulted principally from cash flow from operations
generated during the period. As of June 30, 1995, the Company held approximately
$70.4 million and $18.5 million in short term investments and cash and cash
equivalents, respectively, to meet liquidity needs.
Enhance Financial issued $9 million principal amount of notes in December
1991, of which $1.4 million principal amount was redeemed in the fourth quarter
of each of 1994, 1993 and 1992. Debt service on such notes, including interest
and repayment of principal, totaled $1.9 million in 1994 and will approximate
$1.8 million in 1995. In March 1993, Enhance Financial completed a public
offering of the
20
<PAGE>
6.75% Debentures. Annual debt service on the 6.75% Debentures is approximately
$5.1 million, which became payable in semi-annual installments beginning
September 1993. All of the net proceeds of the 6.75% Debenture offering,
approximately $74 million, were contributed to Enhance Re.
In 1994, Enhance Financial continued its stock repurchase program and
purchased 471,300 shares of Common Stock for a total consideration of $8.6
million. Enhance Financial purchased an additional 362,000 shares for a total
consideration of $5.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 1995,
bringing the total number of shares purchased to that date to 982,200 out of the
total number of shares authorized by the board of directors of 1.2 million.
Effective January 19, 1995, the Company entered into a reverse interest-rate
swap transaction with a triple A-rated counterparty based on a notional amount
of $50 million over a term equal to the remaining term of the 6.75% Debentures.
Pursuant to the terms of the swap, the Company incurred an obligation to pay
interest semi-annually at a variable LIBOR-based interest rate and in exchange
will receive interest at a fixed rate of 8.00%. The variable rate is set
quarterly in advance until the September 1, 1995 reset date and thereafter
semi-annually in advance. The variable rate for the initial period to the first
reset date was 6.1875%. Effective June 1, 1995, the Company terminated the swap
and realized a gain on termination in the amount of $4.6 million. The gain has
been deferred and will be amortized over the original term of the swap.
The Company has no other material commitments for capital or other
expenditures within the next 12 months or thereafter.
FINANCIAL GUARANTY INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
GENERAL
Financial guaranty insurance provides an unconditional and irrevocable
guaranty to the holder of a debt obligation of full and timely payment of
principal and interest. Financial guaranty insurance is primarily offered on
municipal and asset-backed debt obligations. In the event of a default under the
obligation, the insurer has recourse against the issuer and/or any related
collateral (which is a more common component in the case of insured asset-backed
obligations or other non-municipal debt) for amounts paid under the terms of the
policy. Payments under the insurance policy may not be accelerated by the holder
of the debt obligation. Absent payment in full at the option of the insurer, in
the event of a default under an insured obligation the holder continues to
receive payments of principal and interest on schedule, as if no default had
occurred. Each subsequent purchaser of the obligation generally receives the
benefit of such guaranty.
Financial guaranty insurance benefits both issuers and investors. The
principal economic value of financial guaranty insurance to an issuer of an
obligation is the savings in interest costs resulting from the difference
between the interest rates on an insured obligation and the interest rate on the
same obligation on an uninsured basis. Investors benefit from the greater
marketability of the insured obligation and a reduction in the risk of loss
associated with an issuer's default, as well as greater retention of value of
their investment should the issuer experience adversity. See "Risk Factors --
Market and Other Factors" for a discussion of factors affecting the demand for
and supply of financial guaranty insurance.
The premium for financial guaranty insurance is paid by the issuer of the
obligation either in full at the inception of the policy or, less commonly, in
installments on an annual basis. Premium rates are typically calculated as a
percentage of either the principal amount of the debt or total exposure
(principal and interest). Rate setting reflects such factors as the credit
strength of the issuer, type of issue, sources of income, collateral pledged,
restrictive covenants, maturity, prevailing market spreads between insured and
uninsured obligations and competition from other insurers, other providers of
credit enhancement and alternatives to credit enhancement.
21
<PAGE>
Premiums are generally non-refundable and are recognized as income over the
life of the insured obligation. This long and relatively predictable earnings
pattern is characteristic of the financial guaranty insurance industry and
provides a relatively stable source of future revenues and claims-paying ability
to financial guaranty insurers and reinsurers.
In addition to Asset Guaranty, there are currently seven active primary U.S.
financial guaranty insurers: Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation
("MBIA"), AMBAC Indemnity Corporation ("AMBAC"), Financial Guaranty Insurance
Company ("FGIC"), Financial Security Assurance Inc. ("FSA"), Capital Market
Assurance Corporation ("CapMAC"), Connie Lee Insurance Company ("Connie Lee")
and Capital Guaranty Insurance Company ("CGIC"). FSA and CGIC have entered into
a merger agreement relating to the acquisition of CGIC by FSA.
FINANCIAL GUARANTY MARKET
The primary financial guaranty insurance market consists of two main
sectors: municipal bond insurance and insurance on asset-backed debt.
MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET. Municipal bond insurance provides credit enhancement
of bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness issued by states and their
political subdivisions (for example, counties, cities, or towns), utility
districts, public universities and hospitals, public housing and transportation
authorities, and other public and quasi-public entities. Municipal bonds are
supported by the issuer's taxing power in the case of general obligation or
special tax-supported bonds, or by its ability to impose and collect fees and
charges for public services or specific projects in the case of most revenue
bonds. Insurance provided to the municipal bond market has been and continues to
be the major source of revenue for the financial guaranty insurance industry.
The volume of municipal bonds issued in 1994, $164.9 billion, represented a
substantial decline from the $292.0 billion issued in the prior year. This
decline was due to the substantial and rapid increase in interest rates, which
caused a reduction in refunding issues to the point where they represented only
23% of total issuance compared to 51% in 1993. Bonds issued for new money
purposes, however, increased to $116.0 billion in 1994 from the 1993 level of
$97.0 billion. The insured volume of municipal bonds in 1994 declined to $61.2
billion from the 1993 level of $107.9 billion, representing 37% of total
municipal bonds issued in both years.
In the first six month of 1995, $69.2 billion of municipal bonds were
issued, of which $54.6 billion was for new money purposes. The insured portion
of such new issues amounted to 39% in the six-month period.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding new-issue long
term (over one year) municipal bonds and new-issue insured long term municipal
bonds, in each case issued during the years indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NEW INSURED MUNICIPAL
NEW TOTAL NEW INSURED VOLUME AS PERCENT OF
MUNICIPAL MUNICIPAL NEW TOTAL MUNICIPAL
YEAR VOLUME VOLUME VOLUME
- --------------------------------------- ------------- --------------- -----------------------
(IN BILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1986................................... $ 151.3 $ 24.8 16.4%
1987................................... 105.4 21.6 20.5
1988................................... 117.8 30.5 25.9
1989................................... 125.0 30.6 24.5
1990................................... 128.1 33.5 26.2
1991................................... 174.2 51.9 29.8
1992................................... 235.0 81.0 34.5
1993................................... 292.0 107.9 37.0
1994................................... 164.9 61.2 37.1
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
Figures are based upon estimated data provided by The Bond Buyer, September 7,
1995.
22
<PAGE>
In addition to insurance of new issues, financial guaranty insurers have
provided insurance to certain investment vehicles, usually unit investment
trusts or mutual funds, which invest in outstanding issues of municipal bonds.
Although the insurer in such circumstances typically does not have the authority
to restructure the documents of an outstanding issue to conform to its preferred
format, it generally does apply stricter underwriting criteria in determining
which issuers qualify for insurance. Issues with no reserve funds or other
factors usually deemed important in assessing risk of non-payment will be
insured only if the underlying creditworthiness of the issuer is stronger than
usual.
ASSET-BACKED DEBT MARKET. Asset-backed transactions or securitizations
constitute a form of structured financing distinguishable from unsecured debt
issues by being secured by a specific pool of assets having an ascertainable
cash flow or market value that is held by the issuing entity, rather than
relying on the general unsecured creditworthiness of the issuer of the
obligation. While most asset-backed debt obligations represent interests in
pools of assets, such as residential and commercial mortgages and credit card
and auto loan receivables, monoline financial guarantors have also insured
asset-backed debt obligations secured by one or a few assets, such as utility
mortgage bonds and multi-family housing bonds.
The asset-backed securities market experienced very substantial growth in
this decade, with new issuances increasing from approximately $25 billion in
1989 to approximately $75 billion in 1994 and approximately $45 billion in the
six months ended June 30, 1995. Securities backed by credit card receivables
were the fastest growing segment of the market in 1993 and 1994 and constituted
the largest single component of the market in 1994. The principal amount of
asset-backed debt obligations insured by monoline financial guarantors grew from
$6.7 billion in 1989 to an estimated $27.4 billion in 1994.
REINSURANCE
Reinsurance is the commitment by one insurance company, the "reinsurer," to
reimburse another insurance company, the "ceding company," for a specified
portion of the insurance risks underwritten by the ceding company. Because the
insured party contracts for coverage solely with the ceding company, the failure
of the reinsurer to perform does not relieve the ceding company of its
obligation to the insured party under the terms of the insurance contract.
Reinsurance provides various benefits to the ceding company. It reduces net
liability on individual risks, thereby enabling the ceding company to underwrite
larger policies than its own resources would otherwise support; it reduces
excessive exposure in a geographical area or to a particular type of risk and
affords catastrophe protection from large and/or multiple losses; it stabilizes
the ceding company's results of operations by leveling fluctuations in its loss
ratio; and, by reducing its exposure, it helps the ceding company maintain an
acceptable ratio of exposure to policyholders' surplus.
Perhaps most importantly for financial guaranty insurers, reinsurance
enables a primary insurer to write single risks and greater aggregate risks
without contravening the capital requirements of applicable state insurance laws
and rating agency guidelines. State insurance regulators allow primary insurers
to reduce the liabilities appearing on their balance sheets to the extent of
reinsurance coverage obtained from licensed reinsurers or from unlicensed
reinsurers meeting certain solvency and other financial criteria. Similarly, the
rating agencies permit such a reduction for reinsurance in an amount which
depends on the strength of the reinsurer. See "Business -- Rating Agencies" and
"Insurance Regulatory Matters."
The principal forms of reinsurance are treaty and facultative. Under a
treaty arrangement, the ceding company is obligated to cede, and the reinsurer
is correspondingly obligated to assume, a specified portion of a specified type
of risk or risks insured by the ceding company during the term of the treaty
(although the reinsurance risk thereafter extends for the life of the respective
underlying obligations). Under a facultative agreement, the ceding company from
time to time during the term of the agreement offers a portion of specific risks
to the reinsurer, usually in connection with particular debt obligations. A
23
<PAGE>
facultative arrangement differs from a treaty in that the reinsurer performs its
own underwriting credit analysis to determine whether to accept a particular
risk. Treaty and facultative agreements are typically entered into for an
indefinite term, subject to a right of termination under certain circumstances.
Treaty and facultative reinsurance is typically written on either a
proportional or non-proportional basis. Proportional relationships are those in
which the ceding company and the reinsurer share the premiums, as well as the
losses and expenses, of a single risk or group of risks in an agreed percentage.
In addition, the reinsurer generally pays the ceding company a ceding
commission, which is normally related to the ceding company's cost of obtaining
the business being reinsured. Non-proportional reinsurance relationships are
typically on an excess-of-loss basis. An excess-of-loss relationship provides
coverage to a ceding company to the extent that losses exceed a certain amount,
in an amount up to a certain dollar limit. Excess-of-loss coverage can relate to
a complete line of business or to a specific transaction. These relationships
provide the ceding company with earnings protection and, where the coverage is
on a transaction-by-transaction basis, additional single-risk capacity.
Reinsurers may also, in turn, purchase reinsurance under what are called
"retrocessional agreements" to cover all or a portion of their own exposure and
otherwise for reasons similar to those that cause primary insurers to purchase
reinsurance. See "Business -- Retrocession."
24
<PAGE>
BUSINESS
GENERAL
The Company is principally engaged in the reinsurance of financial
guaranties of municipal and asset-backed debt obligations of monoline financial
guaranty insurers. In addition, the Company is engaged in the insurance and
reinsurance of various specialty lines of business that utilize the Company's
expertise in performing sophisticated analyses of complex, credit-based risks.
The Company expects that a significant portion of its growth will come from its
expanding specialty businesses.
Monoline financial guaranty insurers guaranty to the holders of debt
obligations, primarily those issued by municipalities, the full and timely
payment of principal and interest. In conducting its reinsurance business, the
Company assumes a portion of the risk insured, and receives a portion of the
premium collected, by the primary insurer. Reinsurance of financial guaranties
issued by monoline financial guaranty insurers represented 68.7% and 55.8% of
the Company's gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 1994 and
the six months ended June 30, 1995, respectively. During the year ended December
31, 1994, the Company received 35.5% of the total reinsurance premiums ceded by
all monoline financial guaranty insurers.
The Company's specialty businesses currently involve the issuance of direct
financial guaranties of smaller municipal and multi-family housing-backed debt
obligations, trade credit insurance, financial responsibility bonds and
excess-SIPC bonds. This area of the Company's business, measured by gross
premiums written, has grown from its inception in 1991 to represent over 44% of
the Company's gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 1995. The
Company is continuing to expand these businesses and is diversifying its
products and services into other areas that the Company believes have strong
growth potential and in which the Company's strength in credit analysis can
provide a competitive advantage.
The Company's business strategy is to concentrate its efforts on the
maintenance and growth of its financial guaranty business, both primary and
reinsurance, while maintaining its commitment to intensive and prudent credit
underwriting and conservative investment policies; to utilize its expertise in
underwriting credit risks to expand and develop its specialty businesses; and to
accelerate its diversification effort into other areas that the Company believes
have strong profit and growth potential.
The Company's aggregate insurance in force as of June 30, 1995 was $52.3
billion, of which $37.2 billion, or 71.1%, was attributable to reinsurance of
municipal bond obligations; $9.6 billion, or 18.4%, was attributable to
reinsurance of asset-backed debt obligations; and $5.5 billion, or 10.5%, was
attributable to specialty businesses.
The following table is a summary of the Company's net premiums written for
the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 30,
-------------------------------------- ----------------------
1992 1993 1994 1995
---------- ---------- 1994 ---------- ----------
--------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NET PREMIUMS WRITTEN:
Monoline municipal reinsurance................. $ 37,205 $ 62,134 $ 47,235 $ 28,957 $ 17,487
Monoline non-municipal reinsurance............. 8,350 6,169 8,844 3,500 2,946
Specialty business............................. 15,873 18,346 24,606 13,069 15,746
---------- ---------- -------------- ---------- ----------
Total........................................ $ 61,428 $ 86,649 $ 80,685 $ 45,526 $ 36,179
---------- ---------- -------------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- -------------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
REINSURANCE OF MONOLINE FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURERS
The Company's principal business is the reinsurance of financial guaranty
insurance written by the seven monoline financial guaranty insurers. The Company
provides reinsurance on both a treaty and facultative basis for all the monoline
primary insurers except CGIC, which it reinsures only on a facultative basis.
See "-- Sources of Premiums" in this section. As of June 30, 1995, approximately
56% of the
25
<PAGE>
insurance in force attributable to monoline financial guaranty insurers
represented business underwritten on a treaty basis, with the balance being
facultative. The reinsurance written by the Company is subject to a detailed
underwriting review. See "-- Underwriting Staffing, Policies and Procedures"
below. Most of the Company's reinsurance activity is written on a proportional
reinsurance basis.
The Company believes that the reinsurance of municipal bond guaranties,
which the Company expects will grow in response to the anticipated long term
growth in the municipal bond market, provides a relatively stable source of
premium income for the Company.
Except for its reinsurance of a small amount of multi-family housing-backed
business written by one primary insurer, the Company has since 1992 ceased
reinsuring real estate-backed business, and it does not expect to resume
reinsuring such business in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, its portfolio
of such business, totaling $227 million principal amount outstanding as of June
30, 1995 (a decrease from $342 million at year end 1992), is in run-off.
PREMIUMS CEDED BY INDIVIDUAL PRIMARY INSURERS. The following tables set
forth certain information regarding premiums ceded to the Company by the
monoline financial guaranty insurers in 1992, 1993 and 1994 indicating the
Company's position in the industry during those years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1992 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1993 1994
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- -------------
PREMIUMS CEDED PREMIUMS CEDED PREMIUMS CEDED PREMIUMS CEDED
GROSS AS % OF TOTAL AS % OF TOTAL GROSS AS % OF TOTAL AS % OF TOTAL GROSS
PREMIUMS CEDED TO THE PREMIUMS CEDED PREMIUMS CEDED TO THE PREMIUMS CEDED PREMIUMS
PRIMARY CEDED TO THE COMPANY BY ALL BY PRIMARY CEDED TO THE COMPANY BY ALL BY PRIMARY CEDED TO THE
INSURER COMPANY PRIMARY INSURERS INSURER COMPANY PRIMARY INSURERS INSURER COMPANY
- --------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AMBAC.... $ 10,248 22.0% 19.8% $ 14,417 20.6% 40.3% $ 5,631
CapMAC... 1,229 2.7 28.9 574 0.8 16.0 3,618
CGIC..... 715 1.5 65.9 7,198 10.3 100.0 464
Connie
Lee..... 998 2.2 35.8 1,838 2.6 48.2 1,272
FGIC..... 7,599 16.3 19.6 13,690 19.6 27.4 19,608
FSA...... 13,480 29.0 25.6 9,987 14.3 16.1 7,674
MBIA..... 12,247 26.3 38.8 22,320 31.8 46.4 20,195
------------- ------ ------------- ------ -------------
Total.. $ 46,516 100.0% 25.4% $ 70,024 100.0% 33.3% $ 58,462
------------- ------ ------------- ------ -------------
------------- ------ ------------- ------ -------------
<CAPTION>
PREMIUMS CEDED PREMIUMS CEDED
AS % OF TOTAL AS % OF TOTAL
CEDED TO THE PREMIUMS CEDED
PRIMARY COMPANY BY ALL BY PRIMARY
INSURER PRIMARY INSURERS INSURER
- --------- ---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
AMBAC.... 9.6% 23.6%
CapMAC... 6.2 27.8
CGIC..... 0.8 70.1
Connie
Lee..... 2.2 99.0
FGIC..... 33.5 42.4
FSA...... 13.1 26.8
MBIA..... 34.6 39.7
------
Total.. 100.0% 35.5%
------
------
</TABLE>
EXPOSURE ATTRIBUTABLE TO INDIVIDUAL PRIMARY INSURERS. The following table
sets forth the Company's insurance in force attributable to the reinsurance of
financial guaranties issued by monoline primary insurers as of the dates
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF DECEMBER 31, AS OF JUNE 30,
---------------------- ----------------------
1994 1995
---------------------- ----------------------
INSURANCE % OF INSURANCE % OF
PRIMARY INSURER IN FORCE TOTAL IN FORCE TOTAL
- ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AMBAC.............................................................. $ 8,725 19.6% $ 9,529 20.4%
CapMAC............................................................. 637 1.4 1,026 2.2
CGIC............................................................... 981 2.2 1,083 2.3
Connie Lee......................................................... 407 0.9 433 0.9
FGIC............................................................... 11,396 25.6 11,970 25.5
FSA................................................................ 5,191 11.7 5,470 11.7
MBIA............................................................... 17,148 38.6 17,314 37.0
----------- --------- ----------- ---------
Total.......................................................... $ 44,485 100.0% $ 46,825 100.0%
----------- --------- ----------- ---------
----------- --------- ----------- ---------
</TABLE>
PORTFOLIO DATA. The Company seeks to maintain a diversified insurance
portfolio designed to spread its risk based on issuer, type of debt obligation
insured and geographic concentration. The following table sets forth the
distribution of the Company's reinsured monoline-guarantied obligations
26
<PAGE>
by bond type as of December 31, 1994 and June 30, 1995. As the following table
indicates, municipal bond reinsurance accounted for 81.1% and 79.5% of the
Company's insurance in force ceded by the monoline financial guaranty insurers
at these respective dates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1994 AS OF JUNE 30, 1995
--------------------------- ---------------------------
INSURANCE IN % OF GRAND INSURANCE IN % OF GRAND
TYPE OF OBLIGATION FORCE TOTAL FORCE TOTAL
- ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Municipal:
General obligation/tax supported.......................... $ 13,888 31.2% $ 14,162 30.3%
Water/sewer/electric/gas.................................. 9,023 20.3 8,643 18.5
Health care............................................... 5,330 12.0 6,076 13.0
Airports/transportation................................... 4,406 9.9 4,789 10.2
Housing revenue........................................... 1,303 2.9 1,175 2.5
Other (1)................................................. 2,137 4.8 2,343 5.0
------------ ----- ------------ -----
Total................................................. 36,087 81.1 37,188 79.5
------------ ----- ------------ -----
Asset-backed:
Consumer obligations...................................... 3,656 8.2 4,886 10.4
Investor-owned utilities.................................. 3,177 7.1 3,087 6.6
Commercial mortgage....................................... 353 0.8 321 0.7
Other (2)................................................. 1,212 2.8 1,343 2.8
------------ ----- ------------ -----
Total................................................. 8,398 18.9 9,637 20.5
------------ ----- ------------ -----
Grand total........................................... $ 44,485 100.0% $ 46,825 100.0%
------------ ----- ------------ -----
------------ ----- ------------ -----
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Represents other types of municipal obligations, none of which individually
constitutes a material amount or percentage of the Company's insurance in
force.
(2) Includes $585 million and $638 million at December 31, 1994 and June 30,
1995, respectively, collateralized by corporate debt obligations; the
balance represents other types of assets which collateralize obligations
reinsured by the Company, none of which individually constitutes a material
amount or percentage of the Company's insurance in force.
The following table identifies by issuer the Company's 10 largest
single-risk principal amounts outstanding as of June 30, 1995 and the credit
rating assigned by Standard & Poor's as of that date (in the absence of
financial guaranty insurance) to each such issuer:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CREDIT CREDIT RATING OBLIGATION TYPE
- -------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------------------------- AS OF JUNE 30, 1995
--------------------
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
OUTSTANDING
--------------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Mid-State Trust IV(1)............................. (BBB) Consumer Obligation $ 397.7
New York City, NY................................. (BBB+) General Obligation 294.7
State of California............................... (A) General Obligation 289.6
Commonwealth of Massachusetts..................... (A+) General Obligation 287.5
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico....................... (A) General Obligation 287.4
Dade County, Florida Water & Sewer System......... (A) Water & Sewer 254.6
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority... (A-) Water & Sewer 248.2
District of Columbia.............................. (B) General Obligation 233.3
Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority......... (AA-) Airports 230.2
Nassau County, NY................................. (A-) General Obligation 229.2
</TABLE>
27
<PAGE>
- ------------------------
(1) Mid-State Trust IV is an asset-backed security obligation backed by
residential mortgages.
The following table sets forth the distribution by state of the Company's
insurance in force in connection with its reinsurance of monoline-guarantied
obligations as of June 30, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF JUNE 30, 1995
-------------------------
STATE % OF TOTAL
- --------------------------------------------------------------------- INSURANCE IN -----------
FORCE
------------
(IN
MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C>
California........................................................... $ 6,234 13.3%
New York............................................................. 4,998 10.7
Florida.............................................................. 3,991 8.5
Pennsylvania......................................................... 2,825 6.0
Texas................................................................ 2,710 5.8
Illinois............................................................. 2,255 4.8
Massachusetts........................................................ 1,497 3.2
New Jersey........................................................... 1,429 3.1
Ohio................................................................. 1,403 3.0
Michigan............................................................. 962 2.1
Other (1)............................................................ 18,521 39.5
------------ -----
Total............................................................ $ 46,825 100.0%
------------ -----
------------ -----
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Includes $6.1 billion related to pooled or foreign credits for which
specific allocation by state is not available; the balance represents other
states and jurisdictions in which obligations insured and reinsured by the
Company arise, none of which individually constitutes a material portion of
the Company's insurance in force.
UNDERWRITING STAFFING, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. The Company believes that
its underwriting discipline has been critical to its profitable growth. The
Company has a structured underwriting process to determine the characteristics
and creditworthiness of risks that it reinsures, which process supplements the
underwriting procedures of the primary insurers. Rather than relying entirely
upon the underwriting performed by the primary insurers, both the Company and
the rating agencies conduct extensive reviews of the primary insurers.
The Company conducts periodic detailed reviews of each monoline primary
carrier with which it does treaty business. That review entails an examination
of the primary insurer's operating, underwriting and surveillance procedures;
personnel; organization and existing book of business; as well as the primary
insurer's underwriting of a sample of business assumed under the treaty. Any
underwriting issues are discussed internally by the Company's credit committee
and with the primary insurer's personnel.
The Company responds to and usually approves, on a same-day-basis and with a
minimum of credit analysis and no prior review by its full credit committee,
certain high-quality primary facultative submissions falling within certain
aggregate exposure limits. In responding to facultative submissions not meeting
the foregoing criteria, one of the Company's credit analysts, together with the
primary insurer's analyst, reviews the transaction and may also be involved in
the early stages of structuring the financing. The Company's analyst prepares a
formal transaction and credit review, utilizing a standardized report format,
including a recommendation, and presents the review to the Company's credit
committee for approval.
The Company relies on ongoing oversight by its credit committee to avoid
undue exposure concentration in any given type of obligation or geographic area.
Moreover, the ceding insurer is typically required to retain at least 25% of the
exposure on any single risk assumed.
28
<PAGE>
Limitations on the Company's single-risk exposure derive from state
insurance regulation, rating agency guidelines and internally established
criteria. The primary factor in determining single-risk capacity is the class or
sector of business being underwritten. For municipal credits, the Company has
self-imposed single-risk guidelines which range widely, depending upon the
perceived risk of default of the municipal obligation reinsured. On individual
underwritings, the Company's credit committee may limit the allocation of
capacity to an amount below that allowed by the single-risk guidelines noted
above. For asset-backed transactions, the Company's single-risk guidelines
generally follow state insurance regulation limitations.
The Company's surveillance procedures include reviews of all risks insured
as a primary insurer and those exposures assumed as a reinsurer as to which it
may have concerns. The Company also maintains regular communication with the
surveillance departments of the ceding primary insurers.
SPECIALTY BUSINESSES
The Company services certain specialty markets not served by the monoline
financial guaranty industry. In certain of these new business areas, the Company
operates as a primary insurer in areas or for transactions where the monoline
financial guaranty primaries decline to provide coverage; others involve the
Company serving as a reinsurer for certain specialty primary insurers in which
the Company has significant equity interests or is otherwise a participant.
In writing these specialty lines of business, the Company utilizes its
expertise in evaluating complex credit-based risks. In terms of gross premiums
written, the specialty businesses have increased significantly since their
inception in 1991 to the point where they represented over 44% of the Company's
gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 1995, compared to 29%
for the six months ended June 30, 1994. The Company's business strategy includes
its objective to expand and develop further these specialty lines. To that end,
the Company is devoting its data, technology and expertise as part of an
accelerated program to seek out and identify significant diversification
opportunities that the Company believes have strong profit and growth potential
and where the Company's expertise can be utilized.
The following tables set forth certain information concerning the Company's
specialty businesses as of the dates and for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INSURANCE IN FORCE
--------------------------------------------
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------- AS OF JUNE
CATEGORY OF SPECIALTY BUSINESS 1992 1993 1994 30, 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- -----------
(IN BILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Municipal bonds-direct.......................................................... $ 0.6 $ 1.0 $ 1.5 $ 1.7
Multi-family housing-backed financings-direct................................... 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
Credit reinsurance.............................................................. 0.2 0.4 1.7 3.0
Financial responsibility bonds.................................................. 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3
Other........................................................................... 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
--- --- --- ---
Total(1).................................................................... $ 1.3 $ 2.0 $ 3.9 $ 5.5
--- --- --- ---
--- --- --- ---
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Does not include insurance in force pursuant to the excess-SIPC program,
described below.
29
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1992 1993 1994
---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
NET PREMIUMS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS PREMIUMS
CATEGORY OF SPECIALTY BUSINESS WRITTEN EARNED WRITTEN EARNED WRITTEN EARNED
- ------------------------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
(IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Municipal bonds -- direct..... $ 6.2 $ 0.6 $ 4.6 $ 1.5 $ 7.2 $ 1.9
Multi-family housing-backed
financings-direct............ 3.0 0.8 2.8 1.2 1.3 1.4
Credit reinsurance............ 4.7 4.8 6.7 6.5 10.9 10.4
Financial responsibility
bonds........................ 1.9 1.5 2.5 2.0 2.8 2.6
Excess-SIPC................... -- -- 2.0 1.5 2.2 2.0
Other......................... 0.1 0.9 (0.3) 0.4 0.2 0.6
----- --- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total..................... $ 15.9 $ 8.6 $ 18.3 $ 13.1 $ 24.6 $ 18.9
----- --- ----- ----- ----- -----
----- --- ----- ----- ----- -----
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
----------------------------
1995
----------------------------
NET PREMIUMS PREMIUMS
CATEGORY OF SPECIALTY BUSINESS WRITTEN EARNED
- ------------------------------ ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Municipal bonds -- direct..... $ 4.0 $ 1.2
Multi-family housing-backed
financings-direct............ -- 0.6
Credit reinsurance............ 8.0 6.9
Financial responsibility
bonds........................ 2.2 1.7
Excess-SIPC................... 1.2 1.2
Other......................... 0.3 0.2
----- -----
Total..................... $ 15.7 $ 11.8
----- -----
----- -----
</TABLE>
MUNICIPAL BONDS. The Company writes municipal bond insurance as a primary
insurer in certain transactions where the monoline financial guaranty primary
insurers have not elected to participate. This writing is focused on various
market sectors including tax-backed obligations, infrastructure revenue bonds,
health care bonds, higher education bonds and municipal lease obligations. Each
such issue, subsequent to its being insured, must be reviewed by Standard &
Poor's and Duff & Phelps, which determine whether the issue is of investment
grade quality and, after their review, report their findings to the Company.
MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING-BACKED FINANCINGS. Multi-family housing-backed
financings consist principally of refinancings of tax-exempt bonds originally
issued by an industrial development authority or housing finance authority for
the development of multi-family housing. By focusing on refinancings, the
Company is able to avoid the construction and "lease-up" risks which often
characterize initial real estate-backed financings. In addition to the Company's
underwriting procedures, each such financing is reviewed by Standard & Poor's
and Duff & Phelps soon after the transaction is insured by the Company.
CREDIT REINSURANCE. Credit reinsurance protects sellers of goods against
non-payment of the receivables they hold from buyers of those goods, under
certain circumstances. Some companies cover receivables only where the buyer and
seller are in the same country, while other insurers cover cross-border
receivables. In the latter instance, the insurer may cover certain political
risks (foreign currency controls, expropriation, etc.) which interfere with the
payment from the buyer. The Company's credit reinsurance book of business
includes domestic and cross-border business, and some treaties include political
risks.
The Company is a member-reinsurer, together with Great American Insurance
Company, of the Foreign Credit Insurance Association ("FCIA"), which guaranties
export financing for transactions between exporters and foreign purchasers.
In addition, the Company participates in proportional and non-proportional
reinsurance treaties with several credit insurers, primarily in Europe. The
largest relationships in terms of premium are with the NCM Group (domiciled in
the Netherlands) and Trade Indemnity PLC (domiciled in the United Kingdom).
As of June 30, 1995, Enhance Financial owned approximately a 37% equity
interest (representing 55% of the voting interest) in EIC Corporation Ltd.,
which, in turn, owns all the outstanding capital stock of Exporters Insurance
Company Ltd. ("Exporters"), an insurer of domestic and foreign trade receivables
for export companies. The Company provides significant reinsurance capacity to
this joint venture on a proportional quota share and facultative
non-proportional excess-of-loss basis.
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BONDS. The Company owns an indirect controlling
equity interest in Van-American Insurance Company ("Van-Am"), which writes
reclamation bonds for the coal mining industry, generally in strip mining
ventures, and surety bonds covering the closure and post-closure obligations of
landfill operators. The Company also provides proportional quota-share and
facultative proportional surplus share reinsurance to Van-Am.
30
<PAGE>
EXCESS-SIPC. The Company writes surety bonds for the protection of
customers of large securities brokers against the loss of securities in their
brokerage accounts in the event of the broker's insolvency and liquidation.
Bonds issued under this program provide coverage for loss per account in excess
of the $500,000 of loss covered by the government-established Securities
Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC") up to a maximum of $100 million of
loss. The coverage is offered only to members of the brokerage community that
meet specific financial, legal and operating criteria established by the
Company.
Although the dollar value of customer assets protected by the Company's
excess-SIPC policies totals in the billions, the Company's actual exposure is
considerably lower. Losses in a brokerage account occur only to the extent, if
any, a covered broker-dealer becomes insolvent and securities are missing and
the individual customer losses, which are prorated among all the customers of
that broker-dealer, exceed the applicable deductible amount, which ranges from
$500,000 to $25 million per customer on the excess-SIPC policies issued by the
Company. As part of its underwriting process, the Company reviews the operations
and exposure amounts of each broker-dealer applying for coverage and calculates
a maximum loss based on the normal day-to-day operational exposures of that
broker-dealer. The Company estimates that its maximum total losses, net of
reinsurance, in the unlikely circumstance that all covered broker-dealers were
liquidated would not exceed $5 million.
The Company also engages in a limited amount of other types of insurance
business including surety and residual value insurance.
UNDERWRITING PROCESS AND SURVEILLANCE. The underwriting criteria applied in
evaluating a given issue and the internal procedures (for example, credit
committee review) for approval of the issue are substantially the same as for
the underwriting of reinsurance. The principal differences in the process stem
from the fact that the entire underwriting responsibility rests with the Company
as the primary insurer. As a result, the Company participates more actively in
the structuring of the transaction. The Company conducts, at least annually,
in-depth surveillance of issues insured as a primary.
SOURCES OF PREMIUMS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding insurance
business assumed and written by the Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS PREMIUMS
WRITTEN AS
PERCENT OF PREMIUMS EARNED
GROSS NET TOTAL GROSS AS PERCENT OF PREMIUMS EARNED
PREMIUMS PREMIUMS PREMIUMS PREMIUMS TOTAL PREMIUMS AS PERCENT OF
SOURCES OF PREMIUMS WRITTEN WRITTEN EARNED WRITTEN EARNED TOTAL REVENUES
- ---------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------------- -----------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial guaranty
reinsurance
AMBAC..................... $ 5,631 $ 5,572 $ 6,488 6.6% 10.5% 6.7%
CapMAC.................... 3,618 3,618 889 4.3 1.4 0.9
CGIC...................... 464 464 575 0.6 0.9 0.6
Connie Lee................ 1,272 1,272 269 1.5 0.4 0.3
FGIC...................... 19,608 19,608 13,164 23.0 21.3 13.6
FSA....................... 7,674 7,323 8,392 9.0 13.6 8.7
MBIA...................... 20,195 19,725 13,383 23.7 21.7 13.9
Specialty businesses (1).... 26,650 26,650 20,646 31.3 33.5 21.4
Retrocessions............... -- (3,547) (2,049) -- (3.3) (2.1)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----- ----- ---
$ 85,112 $ 80,685 $ 61,757 100.0% 100.0% 64.0%
----------- ----------- ----------- ----- ----- ---
----------- ----------- ----------- ----- ----- ---
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS PREMIUMS
WRITTEN AS
PERCENT OF PREMIUMS EARNED
GROSS NET TOTAL GROSS AS PERCENT OF PREMIUMS EARNED
PREMIUMS PREMIUMS PREMIUMS PREMIUMS TOTAL PREMIUMS AS PERCENT OF
SOURCES OF PREMIUMS WRITTEN WRITTEN EARNED WRITTEN EARNED TOTAL REVENUES
- ---------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------------- -----------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial guaranty
reinsurance
AMBAC..................... $ 7,548 $ 7,548 $ 3,332 20.0% 11.1% 6.5%
CapMAC.................... 738 738 737 2.0 2.4 1.4
CGIC...................... 732 732 281 1.9 0.9 0.5
Connie Lee................ 52 52 91 0.1 0.3 0.2
FGIC...................... 2,005 2,005 3,845 5.3 12.7 7.5
FSA....................... 3,225 3,225 3,692 8.5 12.2 7.2
MBIA...................... 6,761 6,736 6,480 17.9 21.6 12.6
Specialty businesses (1).... 16,678 16,678 12,896 44.3 42.8 25.0
Retrocessions............... -- (1,535) (1,194) -- (4.0) (2.3)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----- ----- ---
$ 37,739 $ 36,179 $ 30,160 100.0% 100.0% 58.6%
----------- ----------- ----------- ----- ----- ---
----------- ----------- ----------- ----- ----- ---
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Includes business written by the Company as a primary insurer. For all
periods presented, no single primary insurer included in "Specialty
businesses" provided greater than 6.3%, 6.6% and 6.0% of gross premiums
written, net premiums written and premiums earned, respectively.
The Company has maintained close and long-standing relationships with its
monoline financial guaranty insurer clients, dating essentially from either the
Company's or the given primary insurer's inception. In the Company's opinion,
these relationships provide the Company with a comprehensive understanding of
its clients' procedures and reinsurance requirements and allow the clients to
utilize the Company's underwriting expertise effectively, thus improving the
service they receive.
The Company is a party to treaty agreements with all the monoline primary
insurers except CGIC and with FCIA, NCM Group, Trade Indemnity PLC, Van-Am and
Exporters and to facultative agreements with all the monoline primary insurers.
The Company's treaty and facultative agreements usually are entered into for an
indefinite term, subject to termination (i) upon written notice (ranging from 90
to 120 days) prior to the specified deadline for renewal or (ii) at the option
of the primary insurer if the Company fails to maintain certain financial,
regulatory and rating agency criteria which are equivalent to or more stringent
than those the Company is otherwise required to maintain for its own compliance
with the Insurance Law and, in the case of the agreements with the primary
monoline insurers, to maintain specified rating agencies' claims-paying ability
ratings for the particular Insurance Subsidiary. Upon termination under the
conditions set forth in (ii) above, the Company may be required to return to the
primary insurer all unearned premiums, less ceding commissions, attributable to
reinsurance ceded pursuant to such agreements. Upon the occurrence of the
conditions set forth in (ii) above, whether or not an agreement is terminated,
the Company may be required to obtain a letter of credit or alternative form of
security to collateralize its obligation to perform under such agreement.
Of the Company's aggregate monoline reinsurance exposure of $46.8 billion as
of June 30, 1995, $26.3 billion, or 56%, was derived through its treaty
relationships with the primary insurers.
LOSS EXPERIENCE
The Company establishes a provision for losses and LAE when reported by
primary insurers or when, in the Company's opinion, an insured risk is in
default or a default is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably
estimable. Provisions for losses and LAE are established based on the estimated
loss, including expenses associated with settlement of the loss, through the
full term of the insured
32
<PAGE>
obligation. In the case of obligations with fixed periodic payments, the
provision for losses and LAE represents the present value of the Company's
ultimate expected losses, adjusted for estimated recoveries under salvage or
subrogation rights. The estimates for losses and LAE are periodically evaluated
by the Company, and changes in estimates are reflected in income currently. The
Company believes that the reserves are adequate to cover the ultimate net cost
of all claims. However, the reserves are necessarily based on estimates, and
there can be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not exceed such
estimates. The estimation of reserves for losses and LAE includes a non-specific
loss reserve.
On any given municipal and asset-backed reinsurance transaction, the Company
and its primary insurer clients underwrite based on a zero-loss underwriting
objective.
As the Company anticipated when it entered into the specialty business area,
it has experienced relatively higher loss levels in certain of these businesses
than it experienced in connection with its monoline reinsurance business. The
Company considers these higher loss levels when it establishes premium rates for
its specialty businesses.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company's
loss experience for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
------------------------------- --------------------
LOSS EXPERIENCE 1992 1993 1994 1994 1995
- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net reserve for losses and LAE at beginning of period....... $ 7,231 $ 13,812 $ 8,753 $ 8,753 $ 26,717
Net provision for losses and LAE
Occurring in current period............................... 9,705 2,772 9,921 3,144 534
Occurring in prior periods................................ (410) 19,315 12,921 1,299 4,136
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total................................................... 9,295 22,087 22,842 4,443 4,670
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net payments for losses and LAE
Occurring in current period............................... 1,709 616 3,216 850 205
Occurring in prior periods................................ 1,005 26,530 1,662 261 2,987
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total................................................... 2,714 27,146 4,878 1,111 3,192
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net reserve for losses and LAE at end of period............. $ 13,812 $ 8,753 $ 26,717 $ 12,085 $ 28,195
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
In 1991 and 1992, the Company established reserves aggregating $9.8 million
in connection with three transactions for which the Company was a reinsurer of
financial guaranties of securities backed by pools of commercial real estate. In
1993, in connection with the refinancing of these three transactions and with a
resulting reduction in exposure, the Company paid losses of approximately $20
million, including the remaining balance of amounts previously reserved, and
thereby incurred additional losses and LAE of $12.9 million. In 1994, following
notification from the primary insurer, the Company increased its case reserves
on these refinanced transactions by $7.1 million. In 1994, the Company also
established case reserves of $2.4 million on two additional transactions in its
discontinued commercial real estate portfolio. Of these additions to case
reserves, $7.5 million were established by transfer from the Company's
non-specific reserve, thereby depleting that reserve. Following re-evaluation of
all its potential exposures, the Company increased its non-specific reserve to
$10 million at year-end 1994.
In addition, in 1993 and 1994, the Company incurred losses of $3.5 million
and $5.7 million, respectively, in connection with its credit and surety
businesses, commensurate with the continued growth in premiums written from
these specialty businesses. In the six months ended June 30, 1995, the Company
incurred losses of $2.8 million in connection with its credit and surety
business.
Net additions to the Company's non-specific reserve in 1993, 1994 and for
the six months ended June 30, 1995 were $3.6 million, $5.5 and $0.3 million,
respectively.
33
<PAGE>
The Company believes that the reserves for losses and LAE, including the
case and non-specific reserves, are adequate to cover the ultimate net cost of
claims. However, the reserves are necessarily based on estimates, and there can
be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not exceed such estimates.
INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT POLICY
The Company's investment portfolio is managed by five professional
independent investment managers, each of which manages a segment of the
portfolio. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions -- Advisory
Services." All investments are guided by the Company's general investment
objectives and policies, including guidelines relating to average maturities and
quality, which are periodically reviewed and revised as appropriate. The
investment policies are designed to achieve diversification of the portfolio and
generally to preclude investments in obligations insured by the Company.
Investments comprise almost entirely fixed income securities, with a mix of
taxable and tax-exempt investments which maximize the net income of the Company.
Moreover, the Company's investment policy does not permit investment in any debt
obligation which is below investment grade, and the Company does not have any
investments of this type.
Effective January 1, 1994 the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, the Company
classifies all securities at the time of purchase as "held to maturity" or
"available for sale." Securities held to maturity are those securities which the
Company intends and has the ability to hold until maturity and are carried at
amortized cost. All other fixed maturity securities are classified as available
for sale, are carried at market value and may be sold in response to changes in
interest rates, prepayment risk, payment of losses and other factors. Unrealized
gains and losses, net of taxes, on the available-for-sale portfolio are charged
or credited to shareholders' equity.
Effective January 15, 1994, the Company assumed internal management and
control of invested assets representing approximately 17% of the book value of
the investment portfolio at December 31, 1993. The Company intends to hold these
assets to maturity, and, accordingly, in accordance with SFAS No. 115, they will
continue to be accounted for on an amortized cost basis.
34
<PAGE>
The following tables set forth certain information concerning the types of
investments and maturities composing the investment portfolio of the Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1994 AS OF JUNE 30, 1995
------------------------- -------------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
CARRYING AVERAGE CARRYING AVERAGE
INVESTMENT CATEGORY (1) VALUE (2) YIELD (3) VALUE (2) YIELD (3)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed Maturities -- held to maturity
Municipal Obligations -- Tax Exempt........................... $ 96,868 6.69% $ 101,206 6.58%
Corporate Securities.......................................... 9,718 8.27 9,737 8.10
US Government Obligations..................................... 3,108 6.60 3,587 6.47
Private Placements............................................ 54,586 10.41 86,868 10.32
----------- ----- ----------- -----
Total....................................................... 164,280 8.02 201,398 8.27
----------- ----- ----------- -----
Fixed Maturities -- available for sale
Municipal Obligations -- Tax Exempt........................... 252,653 5.58 233,337 5.55
Corporate Securities.......................................... 46,456 7.44 47,782 7.26
US Government Obligations..................................... 31,771 7.26 28,899 7.04
Mortgage-backed securities.................................... 87,390 8.18 82,249 7.91
Foreign securities............................................ 22,374 8.23 29,479 7.76
----------- ----- ----------- -----
Total....................................................... 440,644 6.54 421,746 6.46
----------- ----- ----------- -----
Short term investments (4)...................................... 34,235 5.57 81,691 5.37
Common stocks................................................... 729 8.57 729 8.57
----------- ----- ----------- -----
Total Investments........................................... $ 639,888 6.86% $ 705,564 6.85%
----------- ----- ----------- -----
----------- ----- ----------- -----
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
<FN>
- ------------------------------
(1) Excludes investments in affiliates.
(2) Investments in fixed maturities held to maturity are carried at amortized
cost. Investments in fixed maturities available for sale are carried at
market value. Short-term investments are carried at cost, which
approximates their market values. Common stocks are carried at market
value. Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities available for sale
and common stocks are reflected in shareholder's equity.
(3) Represents yield to maturity on fixed maturities and current yield on
common stocks and certain short-term investments. All amounts are stated on
a pre-tax basis.
(4) Includes $5.8 million and $18.5 million of cash and cash equivalents as of
December 31, 1994 and as of June 30, 1995, respectively.
</TABLE>
35
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CARRYING VALUE
------------------------------------------
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1994
----------------------
AS
OF
JUNE
30,
1995
--
MATURITY OF FIXED MATURITIES
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Held to Maturity (1)
Due in one year or less.................................................... $ 11,885 $ 25,983
Due after one year through five years...................................... 55,275 56,688
Due after five years through ten years..................................... 75,532 87,818
Due after ten years........................................................ 21,588 30,909
---------- --------------
Total (2)................................................................ $ 164,280 $ 201,398
---------- --------------
---------- --------------
Available for Sale (3)
Due in one year or less.................................................... $ 2,133 $ 5,210
Due after one year through five years...................................... 66,871 32,624
Due after five years through ten years..................................... 168,922 142,655
Due after ten years........................................................ 202,718 241,257
---------- --------------
Total (4)................................................................ $ 440,644 $ 421,746
---------- --------------
---------- --------------
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) The weighted average maturity of the portfolio is estimated to be 6.9 years
and 5.8 years for December 31, 1994 and June 30, 1995, respectively.
(2) Investments in fixed maturities in the held-to-maturity portfolio are
carried at amortized cost. Total market value as of December 31, 1994 and
June 30, 1995 was $167.3 million and $210.5 million, respectively.
(3) While a significant portion of total fixed maturities are due after 10
years, the weighted average maturity of the portfolio is estimated to be
10.7 years and 11.2 years for December 31, 1994 and June 30, 1995,
respectively. This is due to the nature of mortgage-backed securities and
pre-funded municipal bonds, the expected maturities of which are
significantly shorter than their stated maturities.
(4) Investments in fixed maturities in the available for sale portfolio are
carried at market value. Total amortized cost as of December 31, 1994 and
June 30, 1995 was $481.3 million and $414.6 million, respectively.
36
<PAGE>
The Company has an investment policy of maintaining an investment portfolio
having a weighted average credit rating of not lower than AA and of holding
substantially only those debt securities having a credit rating not lower than
A-. The Company's adherence to these policies is reflected in the following
table setting forth certain information concerning the rating by Standard &
Poor's of the Company's investments. The Company's investment strategy also
entails the investment of the maximum available cash in higher yielding, private
placement assets. These assets are fixed-maturity obligations whose quality
ratings do not alter the otherwise weighted average credit rating of the
Company's investment portfolio.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
-------------------------------
AS OF DECEMBER AS OF JUNE
31, 30,
RATING 1994 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
AAA (1).................................................................... 40.9% 42.7%
AA......................................................................... 48.3 40.0
A.......................................................................... 10.7 12.5
Other...................................................................... 0.1(2) 4.8(3)
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Includes US Treasury and agency obligations, which constituted approximately
21.0% and 14.6% of the total portfolio as of December 31, 1994 and June 30,
1995, respectively.
(2) Consists of common stock.
(3) Consists of common stock and securities not yet rated.
RETROCESSION
The Company is a party to certain facultative retrocession agreements,
pursuant to which it cedes to certain retrocessionnaires a portion of its
reinsurance exposure. Retrocessions do not discharge the Company from liability
to the primary insurer. That is, the Company is required to pay the full amount
of its obligations to the primary insurer regardless of whether it is entitled
to receive payments from its retrocessionnaire. The Company therefore believes
that in most cases it is vital that retrocessions be made only to very
creditworthy retrocessionnaires. The Company also cedes to reinsurers a portion
of its direct insurance exposure, and the foregoing also describes in general
the relationship between the Company and its reinsurers.
The Company has historically retroceded relatively little of its financial
guaranty reinsurance exposure mainly because the economic gain was not deemed
sufficient to offset both the costs of developing a program and the additional
risks the Company would assume. These risks include that of the solvency of the
retrocessionnaire and possible additional risk if the retrocession is effected
on a non-proportional basis. In 1994, in order to provide needed single-risk
capacity to its primary insurers while staying within regulatory limitations,
the Company retroceded financial guaranty business to two companies highly rated
by Standard & Poor's and expects to retrocede additional amounts in the future,
but on a limited basis.
In its specialty businesses, the Company in recent years has increased the
amount of direct exposure which it reinsures out, particularly that incurred in
its excess-SIPC program, principally in order to comply with applicable
regulatory single-risk limitations. Most of the reinsurance capacity for its
excess-SIPC program is provided by certain of the primary financial guaranty
insurers, for which the Company serves as reinsurer in their municipal bond and
asset-backed transactions. In addition, the Company retrocedes a portion of its
credit reinsurance business from FCIA to several international reinsurance
companies.
In addition to its proportional retrocession agreements described above,
Enhance Re is party to an excess-of-loss reinsurance agreement with Hannover
Ruckversicherungs AG ("Hannover Re") under which it will be entitled, subject to
certain conditions, to draw from Hannover Re up to $25 million to the extent, if
any, it incurs losses in a single calendar year (a) in excess of the greater of
(i) $100 million or
37
<PAGE>
(ii) 325% of net earned premiums for that year or (b) which reduce its statutory
capital to an amount below $75 million. The agreement has a term of one year and
is cancelable annually at the option of either party, except that the Company
has the option to force a seven-year run-off period. Hannover Re is a German
reinsurance company which has a claims-paying ability rating from Standard &
Poor's of AA+.
Gross written premiums of $3.5 million were ceded or retroceded by the
Insurance Subsidiaries to unaffiliated companies in 1994, of which amount 55%
was paid to insurance companies having triple-A claims-paying ability ratings
from Standard & Poor's. Gross written premiums of $1.5 million were ceded or
retroceded by the Insurance Subsidiaries to unaffiliated companies in the six
months ended June 30, 1995, of which 41% was paid to insurers having triple-A
claims-paying ability ratings from Standard & Poor's.
MARKETING
Most of the Company's business derives from relationships it has established
and maintains with primary insurance companies. These relationships provide
business for the Company in the following major areas: (1) reinsurance for
municipal bonds and asset-backed securities (in which area the Company currently
has either quota share or facultative agreements with all the monoline primary
companies); (2) credit reinsurance (in which the Company collected premiums from
28 credit insurers through June 30, 1995, primarily domiciled in Europe); and
(3) affiliated-company reinsurance (which includes Van-Am, Exporters and FCIA).
The Company markets directly to the monoline insurers writing credit
enhancement business and has direct relationships with its affiliated primary
insurers. Specialist reinsurance intermediaries, most of whom are located in
London, usually present to the Company reinsurance opportunities in the credit
insurance sector. These brokers work with the Company's marketing personnel in
introducing the Company to the primary credit insurance markets and in
structuring reinsurance to meet the needs of the primary insurers.
Intermediaries are typically compensated by the reinsurer based on a percentage
of premium assumed, which varies from transaction to transaction.
COMPETITION
REINSURANCE OF MONOLINE FINANCIAL GUARANTIES. The Company is subject to
direct competition from the only other U.S. company specializing in the
reinsurance of financial guaranty insurance, Capital Reinsurance Company
("Capital Re"), which, together with the Company, provide most of the
reinsurance available for the monoline financial guaranty primary insurers
particularly with respect to facultative reinsurance. The Company believes that
it and Capital Re generally participate in roughly equal percentages in treaties
with primary insurers. Almost all U.S. multiline insurers have declined to
participate in the reinsurance market, which the Company ascribes primarily to
their lack of the special expertise and underwriting skills necessary for this
line of reinsurance. However, several foreign insurers and reinsurers do compete
with the Company on both treaty and facultative bases in the provision of
reinsurance for municipal and asset-backed transactions. Certain of these are
companies with which some of the U.S. primary financial guaranty insurers have
formed strategic alliances. In light of the relatively few primary insurers and
dedicated reinsurers in the financial guaranty insurance industry and the
relatively narrow insurance industry segment in which these companies operate,
and assuming there is no extraordinary increase in the amount of financial
instruments requiring guaranties, increased competition, either in terms of
price or in terms of new entrants into the financial guaranty market, would
likely have an adverse effect on the Company's prospects.
Competition in the financial guaranty reinsurance business is based upon
many factors, including overall financial strength, pricing, service and
evaluation by the rating agencies of claims-paying ability. The agencies allow
credit to a ceding primary insurer's capital requirements and single-risk limits
for reinsurance ceded in an amount which is a function of the strength of the
reinsurer. The Company believes that competition from multiline reinsurers and
new monoline financial guaranty insurers will be limited due to (a) the
declining number of multiline insurers with the requisite financial strength and
(b) the barriers to entry for new reinsurers posed by state insurance law and
rating agency criteria governing minimum capitalization.
38
<PAGE>
Financial guaranty insurance, including municipal bond insurance, also
competes with other forms of credit enhancement, including letters of credit and
guaranties provided primarily by foreign banks and other financial institutions,
some of which are governmental agencies or have been assigned the highest credit
ratings awarded by one or more of the major rating agencies. However, these
credit enhancements serve to provide primary insurers with increased insurance
capacity only for rating agency purposes. They do not qualify as capital for
state regulatory purposes, nor do they constitute credit against specific
liabilities which would allow the primary insurer greater single-risk capacity.
SPECIALTY BUSINESSES. The Company believes that there are a number of
direct competitors of the Company in these specialty businesses, some of which
have greater financial and other resources than the Company. The Company has
limited its activities in specialty market areas to those activities which are
not served by the Company's financial guaranty monoline primary insurer clients.
As a primary insurer, the Company writes insurance on those multi-family
housing-backed financings which are too small for the Company's financial
guaranty monoline primary insurer clients and those municipal bonds with respect
to which such primary insurers have declined to participate because of the size
or complexity of such bond issuances relative to the return. The Company also
serves as a reinsurer for certain specialty primary insurers which are not
monoline financial guaranty insurers, in which the Company has significant
equity interests or is otherwise a participant. Such reinsurance accounted for
7.3% of the Company's gross premiums written in 1994. These specialty primary
insurers are themselves subject to competition from other primary insurers, many
of which have greater financial and other resources.
RATING AGENCIES
The rating agencies allow credit to a ceding primary insurer's capital
requirements and single-risk limits for reinsurance ceded in an amount depending
on the strength of the reinsurer. Standard & Poor's allows 100% credit for
AAA-rated reinsurers, 70% credit for AA-rated reinsurers, 30% credit for A-rated
reinsurers and no credit for lower rated reinsurers. Moody's considers
reinsurers' financial strength, but has not published specific guidelines. Duff
& Phelps allows primary insurers 100% credit for reinsurance rated A or better,
but in applying its financial modeling tests, the credit for reinsurance rated
AA or A is thereafter reduced annually in small increments pursuant to a preset
formula. Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Duff & Phelps periodically review the
business and financial condition of the Company. Moody's reviews reinsurers and
reinsurance programs on a case-by-case basis and gives credit in accordance with
an undisclosed formula.
The claims-paying ability ratings assigned by the rating agencies to a
reinsurance or insurance company are based upon factors relevant to
policyholders and are not directed toward the protection of the reinsurer's or
insurer's securityholders. Such a rating is neither a rating of securities nor a
recommendation to buy, hold or sell any security. Claims-paying ability ratings
assigned to the Insurance Subsidiaries should not be viewed as indicative of or
relevant to any ratings which may be assigned to the Company's outstanding debt
securities by any rating agency and should not be considered an evaluation of
the likelihood of the timely payment of principal or interest under such
securities.
The claims-paying ability rating criteria used by the rating agencies focus
on the following factors: capital resources, financial strength and resources;
demonstrated management expertise in financial guaranty and traditional
reinsurance, credit analysis, systems development, marketing, capital markets
and investment operations; and a minimum policyholders' surplus comparable to
primary company requirements, with initial capital sufficient to meet projected
growth as well as access to such additional capital as may be necessary to
continue to meet standards for capital adequacy. As part of their rating
process, Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Duff & Phelps test the capital adequacy
of the Insurance Subsidiaries they rate by subjecting them to a "worst-case
depression scenario." Expected losses over a depression period are established
by applying capital charges to the existing and projected insurance portfolio.
The Company's ability to compete with other triple-A rated financial
guaranty reinsurers, and consequently its results of operations, would be
materially adversely affected by any downgrade in Enhance Re's or Asset
Guaranty's ratings. Moreover, in addition to the loss of new business that would
39
<PAGE>
result from any such downgrade, several treaties to which either Insurance
Subsidiary is a party grant the respective primary insurers the right to
recapture business previously ceded to such Insurance Subsidiary should it
suffer a downgrade of a specified magnitude in its claims-paying ability rating.
This could result in a material adverse affect on the Company's deferred premium
revenue and its recognition of future income therefrom.
The Company's ability to continue engaging in certain specialty businesses,
principally municipal bonds, would be adversely affected by a downgrade in Asset
Guaranty's rating by Standard & Poor's or Duff & Phelps.
DATA PROCESSING
The Company believes that its data processing system is adequate to support
its current needs and has the capacity to support a greater volume of
reinsurance business. Since it commenced operations, the Company has used
minicomputer systems, currently consisting of a configuration composed of two
Digital Equipment processors, which provide computing services even if only one
processor is available. The Company's data center provides computing services on
a continuous basis 24 hours a day, seven days a week. System applications files
and data bases are backed up to tape on a daily basis, and image back-ups to
tape of all disks are performed quarterly. Back-up tapes are shipped to an
off-site storage facility weekly. Prior to shipment, these tapes are stored
outside the data center in a fireproof safe.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 30, 1995, the Company had 88 employees. None of the
employees is covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Company considers
its employee relations to be good.
PROPERTIES
The Company other than Van-Am occupies 40,550 square feet of office space
comprising its executive offices at 335 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10017
pursuant to a sublease expiring August 2000. Van-Am occupies 6,300 square feet
of office space at 167 East Main Street, Lexington, Kentucky, pursuant to a
lease expiring December 1999.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not a party, nor is any of its property subject, to any
material legal proceedings.
ACCOUNTING
GENERAL
The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in
accordance with GAAP. For reporting to certain state regulatory authorities and
the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, financial statements of the
Insurance Subsidiaries are prepared in accordance with statutory accounting
practices ("SAP"), which generally reflect the financial position of the
reporting entity on a more conservative basis than GAAP.
PREMIUM REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company's revenue consists primarily of (a) premiums earned over the
life of obligations insured or reinsured and (b) investment income. Premiums for
the Company's financial guaranty insurance and reinsurance contracts are in most
cases payable in full at the outset of the terms of noncancellable policies. In
such cases, the premium charged is usually a percentage of the principal
outstanding and interest to be paid over the remaining life of the underlying
debt obligations. Under GAAP, the net premiums written are credited to the
Company's deferred premium revenue and are earned in proportion to the level
amortization of insured principal over the term of each insured debt obligation.
Because of the long maturities of most municipal and asset-backed obligations
insured or reinsured by the Company, the portion of premium earned on a policy
in any year represents a relatively small percentage of the total net premium
written at the commencement of the policy. Premiums not earned in the first year
of the policy remain in deferred premium revenue until earned in subsequent
years over the life of the debt obligation.
40
<PAGE>
When an insured issue has been refunded, the remaining deferred premium
revenue on the refunded issue in excess of any deferred premium credited to the
refunding issue (the "new issue") is recognized at that time, since the risk to
the Company on the refunded issue is considered to have been eliminated.
Typically, the Company participates in the reinsurance of the new issue. If the
new issue is not insured or is not reinsured by the Company, the entire
remaining deferred premium revenue on the refunded issue is recognized as
revenue when the Company receives proper notification and documentation that the
refunding has occurred.
DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS
In accordance with GAAP, in order to match expenses with revenues, the
Company defers certain policy acquisition costs and amortizes them over the
period in which the related premiums are earned. Deferred policy acquisition
costs comprise those expenses, generally incurred at the commencement of the
term of the insurance and reinsurance contract, that vary with and are primarily
related to the production of new or renewal business, including: commissions
paid on reinsurance assumed, salaries and related costs of underwriting and
marketing personnel, rating agency fees, premium taxes and certain other
underwriting expenses, offset by ceding commission income on premiums ceded to
reinsurers, or retrocessionaires. Deferred policy acquisition costs are reviewed
periodically to determine that they do not exceed recoverable amounts.
INSURANCE REGULATORY MATTERS
NEW YORK FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE STATUTE
The Insurance Subsidiaries are domiciled and licensed in the State of New
York as financial guaranty insurers under that portion of the Insurance Law
constituting the financial guaranty insurance statute. They are also subject to
the provisions of the Insurance Law and related rules and regulations governing
property-casualty insurers to the extent such provisions are not inconsistent
with the financial guaranty insurance statute. Both Insurance Subsidiaries are
also licensed under the Insurance Law to write surety insurance, credit
insurance and residual value insurance, which are the only other types of
insurance that a financial guaranty insurer licensed under the Insurance Law may
be authorized to write.
The Insurance Subsidiaries are required by New York and each other
jurisdiction in which they are licensed to make various filings, including
quarterly and annual financial statements prepared in accordance with SAP, with
those jurisdictions and with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(the "NAIC").
The Insurance Law requires that financial guaranty insurers and reinsurers
maintain both a reserve for known incurred losses (similar to the reserve
described in "Business -- Loss Experience") and a special "contingency reserve"
to protect policyholders against the impact of excessive losses occurring during
adverse economic cycles. Statutory contingency reserves with respect to
obligations reinsured by Enhance Re and Asset Guaranty have been in existence
since each such company's inception and have not been reduced. As of June 30,
1995 the statutory contingency reserves of the Insurance Subsidiaries aggregated
$108.4 million. The size of the contingency reserve is a function of the
premiums written and the principal guaranteed. Moreover, the reserve must be
maintained for a specified period, although it may be drawn on under specified
circumstances if certain conditions are satisfied.
The Insurance Law establishes single-risk limits applicable to all
obligations issued by a single entity and backed by a single revenue source and
aggregate risk limits on the basis of aggregate net liability and policyholders'
surplus requirements. The Insurance Law also regulates the types of securities
in which the Insurance Subsidiaries may invest their minimum policyholders'
surplus.
In connection with a recent examination of filings of Asset Guaranty by the
New York Insurance Department (the "Department"), the Company has become aware
that Asset Guaranty is not in compliance with the provision of the Insurance Law
that regulates the types of securities in which insurance companies may invest
their minimum policyholders' surplus. The Company intends to restructure Asset
41
<PAGE>
Guaranty's portfolio as soon as practicable in order to comply with the
Insurance Law. The Company does not believe that such non-compliance or such
restructuring of Asset Guaranty's portfolio will have a material adverse effect
on the Company's results of operations.
FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE REGULATION IN OTHER STATES
The Insurance Subsidiaries are subject to the insurance laws in each
jurisdiction in which they are licensed to transact insurance.
Reinsurance activities are generally not directly regulated by state law,
which typically excludes the transaction of reinsurance from the activities that
constitute the transaction of insurance and that therefore require licensure.
Reinsurance activities are, however, generally subject to limited indirect
regulation in most states through the regulation of ceding primary insurers
domiciled in those states.
INSURANCE HOLDING COMPANY LAWS
Enhance Financial, as the parent, and the Insurance Subsidiaries, as
controlled insurers, are subject to regulation under the insurance holding
company laws of New York, which requires the Insurance Subsidiaries to register
with the Department and to file with it certain reports including information
concerning their capital structure, ownership, financial condition, certain
intercompany transactions and general business operations.
State holding company laws also require prior notice or regulatory approval
of direct or indirect changes in control of an insurer or its holding company
and of certain material intercorporate transfers of assets within the holding
company structure.
Under the Insurance Law, any person holding or acquiring, directly or
indirectly, 10% or more of the voting securities of an insurance company is
presumed to be holding or acquiring "control" of such company and its
subsidiaries, unless the Department determines upon application that such
acquiror would not control such company. As a beneficial owner of more than 10%
of the voting shares of Enhance Financial, each of USWFS and Manufacturers Life
is presumed under the Insurance Law indirectly to control the Insurance
Subsidiaries. See "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management." Pursuant to applications made under Section 1501(c) of the
Insurance Law, the Department has determined, subject to certain conditions,
that neither of such shareholders is considered the ultimate controlling person
of either Insurance Subsidiary.
RESTRICTIONS ON DIVIDENDS BY THE INSURANCE SUBSIDIARIES
The principal source of cash for the payment by Enhance Financial of
dividends and the principal and interest on its debt is the receipt of dividends
from the Insurance Subsidiaries. Under the Insurance Law, the Insurance
Subsidiaries may declare or distribute dividends only out of their earned
surplus (defined to exclude unrealized appreciation) and so long as any such
dividend payment does not reduce their respective statutory capital below $68.4
million, the minimum statutory capital required under the Insurance Law. The
maximum amount of dividends that either Insurance Subsidiary may declare or
distribute in any 12-month period is, in general, the lesser of (a) adjusted net
investment income (defined to include net investment income for the 12 months
preceding the declaration or distribution of the current dividend increased by
the excess, if any, of net investment income over dividends declared or
distributed during the period commencing 36 months prior to the current dividend
and ending 12 months prior thereto) or (b) 10% of policyholders' surplus as of
the end of the most recently reported quarter. As of June 30, 1995, based on the
most recently filed statutory financial statements of the Insurance
Subsidiaries, the amounts (determined on a SAP basis) for Enhance Re represented
by (a) and (b) above were $44.2 million and $21.6 million, respectively, and the
amounts for Asset Guaranty represented by (a) and (b) above were $23.3 million
and $7.8 million, respectively. Accordingly, after giving effect to the dividend
restrictions in the Insurance Law and the requirement that each such company
maintain minimum statutory capital of $68.4 million as of June 30, 1995, the
maximum amounts which may be distributed by Enhance Re and Asset Guaranty, based
on such statutory financial statements, were $14.2 million and $7.8 million,
respectively. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources."
42
<PAGE>
NAIC/IRIS RATIOS
The Insurance Regulatory Information System of the NAIC was developed
primarily to assist state insurance departments in executing their statutory
mandates to oversee the financial condition of insurance companies operating in
their respective states. The system identifies eleven industry ratios and
specifies "usual values" for each ratio.
For 1994, Asset Guaranty's change in writings was +84%, which fell outside
the usual value for change in writings of -33% to +33%. Departure from the usual
value may result in inquiries from the state insurance regulators. The unusual
increase was due to significant increases in all major business lines and in
particular its municipal reinsurance business, which increased over 300%,
year-to-year, exclusive of business assumed from Enhance Re, following receipt
of its AA rating from Standard & Poor's. Direct municipal and specialty
businesses increased 58% and 47%, respectively, for the same period.
43
<PAGE>
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below is certain information concerning directors and executive
officers of Enhance Financial. Each director holds office (subject to Enhance
Financial's by-laws) until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his
or her successor has been elected and qualified. The information concerning the
directors has been furnished by them to Enhance Financial.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE (1) POSITION WITH ENHANCE FINANCIAL
- -------------------------- --------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Allan R. Tessler 59 Chairman of the Board
Wallace O. Sellers 65 Vice Chairman of the Board
Daniel Gross 52 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Samuel Bergman 47 Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Ronald M. Davidow 45 Executive Vice President
Tony M. Ettinger 38 Executive Vice President
Robert M. Rosenberg 50 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Bernard L. Smith, Jr. 53 Executive Vice President
James T. Anderson 56 Director
Arthur Dubroff 45 Director
Brenton W. Harries 67 Director
David R. Markin 64 Director
Christopher J. Marsico 34 Director
Bruce D. Monus 40 Director
Richard J. Shima 56 Director
Zane Stait-Gardner 51 Director
Spencer R. Stuart 73 Director
Frieda K. Wallison 52 Director
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) As of September 30, 1995
MR. TESSLER has held the position with Enhance Financial set forth above
since its inception. He has also been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of International Financial Group, Inc., a merchant banking concern,
since 1987 and Allis-Chalmers Corporation, a manufacturer of miscellaneous
fabricated textile products, since November 1993. He also served as Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Ameriscribe Corporation, a provider of
reprographic and related facilities management services, from 1988 to 1993. Mr.
Tessler is also Chairman of the Board of Great Dane Holdings Inc. ("Great Dane")
and Jackpot Enterprises Inc. ("Jackpot") and a director of The Limited, Inc.
Beginning in 1990, Mr. Tessler was retained by Infotechnology, Inc. and
Financial News Network Inc. ("FNN") as a member of a two-person restructuring
team and to serve as a Co-Chief Executive Officer during the restructuring of
these companies. As part of the plan implemented by the restructuring team,
these companies were placed in bankruptcy. FNN emerged from bankruptcy in 1992
as Data Broadcasting Corporation ("DBC"), a provider of market data services to
the investment community. Mr. Tessler continues to serve as Co-Chairman of the
Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of DBC.
MR. SELLERS has held the position with Enhance Financial set forth above
since January 1995. Prior thereto, he served as President, Chief Executive
Officer and a director of Enhance Financial and Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Insurance Subsidiaries from their inception. He is a
director of Danielson Holding Company, Inc.
44
<PAGE>
MR. GROSS has held the position with Enhance Financial set forth above and
has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Insurance Subsidiaries since
January 1995. Prior thereto he held senior executive positions with Enhance
Financial and Enhance Re from their inception and was among the founders of the
Company in 1986. Previously, he was President of Daniel J. Gross & Associates
and was a co-founder and Chairman of F.G. Holding Company. Mr. Gross also was
President of Kramer Capital Consultants and worked for Colonial Penn Group as
President of Colonial Penn Insurance Company and Vice President of Marketing for
Colonial Penn Group, and Vice President and Actuary of Colonial Penn Life.
MR. BERGMAN has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the
Company since 1991. He has been Secretary of Enhance Financial since 1991 and
Secretary of each of the Insurance Subsidiaries since their inception. He was a
member of the law firm of Shea & Gould from 1980 to 1991.
MESSRS. DAVIDOW AND ROSENBERG have each served as senior executive officers
of the Insurance Subsidiaries since such companies' inception; and as officers
of Enhance Financial since September 1990.
MR. ETTINGER has held the position with Enhance Financial set forth above
since January 1995. From 1993 to 1995 he rendered consulting and strategic
planning services to life insurance companies, and previously thereto from 1989
he served as general partner of Hannibal Associates, L.P., an investment
partnership.
MR. SMITH has held the position with Enhance Financial set forth above and
has served as a senior executive officer of each of the Insurance Subsidiaries
since 1991. He previously served from 1990 to 1991 as a consultant to the
Commonwealth Technology Foundation, the venture capital division of the
endowment fund of Boston University, and from 1984 to 1990 served as Executive
Vice President of Bond Investors Guaranty, a financial guaranty insurer, which
was acquired by MBIA.
MR. ANDERSON has served as a director of Enhance Financial since January
1994, having also served as a director of Asset Guaranty from 1993 until
September 1995. He has since 1976 served in various senior management capacities
with U S WEST and its subsidiaries, currently as acting Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of U S WEST. Mr. Anderson serves as a director of
Community First Bank, Fargo, North Dakota.
MR. DUBROFF has served as a director of Enhance Financial since 1992 having
previously served as a director of Enhance Financial from 1986 through 1991 and
of Enhance Re from 1986 through 1992. Mr. Dubroff has since November 1993 served
in various senior management capacities, currently as Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Quality Officer, of The Shareholder Services
Group, a subsidiary of First Data Corporation, a provider of high-volume
information processing and related services. Previously thereto from 1992, he
served as Chief Financial Officer of Securities Processing Group, a division of
Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. ("Shearson"), and also as Executive Vice
President of Shearson. Previously thereto from 1991, Mr. Dubroff served as a
financial officer of American Express Information Services Corporation.
Previously thereto from 1985, Mr. Dubroff served in various senior management
capacities with various subsidiaries of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
MR. HARRIES has served as a director of Enhance Financial since 1991, having
also served as a director of the Insurance Subsidiaries from 1986 until
September 1995. He has been retired since 1986, having previously served from
1985 as President of Global Electronic Markets Company, a joint venture of
McGraw-Hill and Citicorp dealing in electronic trading of commodities. Mr.
Harries also serves as a trustee of the Equitable Funds, Inc. and the Hudson
River Trust.
MR. MARKIN has served as a director of Enhance Financial since 1986. He has
since 1989 served as President of International Controls Corp. and its successor
corporation, Great Dane. Mr. Markin serves as a director of Jackpot and DBC.
45
<PAGE>
MR. MARSICO has served as director of Enhance Financial since April 1995. He
has served in various management capacities with U S WEST and its subsidiaries
since 1988, currently as Vice President-Finance of U S WEST Financial Services,
Inc. and U S WEST Real Estate, Inc.
MR. MONUS has served as a director of Enhance Financial since March 1995. He
has since 1988 served in various management capacities with Manufacturers Life
and its subsidiaries, currently principally as Investment Vice President, U.S.
Bonds, Investment Operations, of Manulife Financial.
MR. SHIMA has served as a director of Enhance Financial since 1993. He has
been an independent consultant since 1993, having previously thereto from 1992
served as Managing Director of Russell Miller, Inc., an investment banking
concern specializing in the insurance industry. He previously served from 1963
as an officer of The Travelers Corporation, most recently, from 1985 to 1991, as
Vice Chairman and Chief Investment Officer. Mr. Shima serves as a director of
Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation and the Keystone Mutual Funds.
MS. STAIT-GARDNER has served as a director of Enhance Financial since March
1995. She has since 1973 served in various management capacities with
Manufacturers Life and its subsidiaries, currently principally as Senior Vice
President and General Manager, Reinsurance Operations, of Manulife Financial
MR. STUART has served as a director of Enhance Financial and Enhance Re
since 1992, having also served as a director of Asset Guaranty since its
inception until September 1995. He has for the last ten years served as an
independent consultant regarding organizational and personnel matters. He served
from 1990 to 1992 as Chairman of the Council of Management Advisors of Dean
Witter Reynolds Inc. He is the founder and honorary chairman of Spencer Stuart
Executive Recruiting Consultants and serves as a director of UST Inc.
MS. WALLISON has served as a director of Enhance Financial since 1992,
having also served as a director of each of the Insurance Subsidiaries since its
inception until September 1995. She has since 1983 been a member of the law firm
of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, resident in its Washington, D.C. office.
46
<PAGE>
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as of September 30, 1995 by (a) each
shareholder known to Enhance Financial to be the beneficial owner, within the
meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, of more than 5% of the outstanding
shares of Common Stock; (b) each director of Enhance Financial; (c) each of the
five most highly compensated executive officers of Enhance Financial; and (d)
all executive officers and directors of Enhance Financial as a group. Unless
otherwise indicated, the address of each such person is
c/o Enhance Financial Services Group Inc., 335 Madison Avenue, New York, New
York 10017.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF PERCENT
NAME AND ADDRESS SHARES (1) OF CLASS
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
U S WEST, Inc. ..................................................................... 5,430,800(2) 31.5
7800 East Orchard Road
Suite 200
Englewood, Colorado 80111
Manufacturers Life Insurance Company ............................................... 2,561,745(2) 14.9
200 Bloor Street, East
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M4W 1E5
The Capital Group Companies, Inc. .................................................. 1,013,000(3) 5.9
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Heine Securities Corporation ....................................................... 977,700 5.7
51 J.F.K. Parkway
Short Hills, NJ 07078
Allan R. Tessler.................................................................... 265,500(4)(5) 1.5
Daniel Gross........................................................................ 341,800(4) 2.0
Wallace O. Sellers.................................................................. 327,875(4)(6) 1.9
Robert M. Rosenberg................................................................. 102,850(4) *
Samuel Bergman...................................................................... 33,970(4) *
Bernard L. Smith, Jr................................................................ 29,375 (4) *
James T. Anderson................................................................... 1,000 (7) *
Arthur Dubroff...................................................................... 6,000 (5) *
Brenton W. Harries.................................................................. 6,000 (5) *
David R. Markin..................................................................... 113,000 (5) *
Christopher J. Marsico.............................................................. -- *
Bruce D. Monus...................................................................... -- *
Richard J. Shima.................................................................... 2,000 (8) *
Zane Stait-Gardner.................................................................. -- *
Spencer R. Stuart................................................................... 6,000 (5) *
Frieda K. Wallison.................................................................. 9,400 (5) *
All executive officers and directors as a group..................................... 1,352,425 (9) 7.8
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than 1%
(1) The table in this section is based upon information supplied by directors,
officers and principal shareholders and Schedules 13D and 13G, if any, filed
with the Commission. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the
table and subject to the community property laws where applicable, each of
the shareholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power
with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned by him or her.
47
<PAGE>
(2) The shares are owned directly by USWFS, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary
of U S WEST. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions --
Shareholders' Agreement" for information regarding a voting agreement to
which all or a portion of such shares are subject and "-- Special Charter
Provision" for information regarding special powers of U S WEST under
Enhance Financial's certificate of incorporation. Assuming U S WEST delivers
all of the shares of Common Stock to which this Prospectus relates, U S WEST
will thereafter not own any shares of Common Stock. See "Plan of
Distribution."
(3) Represents shares owned by various institutional investors as to which two
wholly owned operating subsidiaries of the named shareholder exercise
investment discretion. Such subsidiaries hold voting power with respect to
673,000 of such shares.
(4) Includes the shares set forth in: (a) Column A below issued to the named
officer under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan for Key Employees (the
"Incentive Plan") which have not vested, (b) Column B below issuable to the
named officer upon the exercise of presently exercisable options granted
under the Incentive Plan and (c) Column C below owned by such officer's wife
and children or in trusts of which the named officer is a trustee.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME A B C
- -------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Allan R. Tessler.................................. 0 13,500 2,000
Daniel Gross...................................... 22,150 110,000 93,500
Wallace O. Sellers................................ 31,250 147,375 145,250
Robert M. Rosenberg............................... 8,225 46,250 200
Samuel Bergman.................................... 0 30,125 600
Bernard L. Smith, Jr.............................. 0 29,375 0
</TABLE>
(5) Includes 5,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of the presently
exercisable portion of options granted to such director under the Company's
Non-Employee-Director Stock Option Plan (the "Director Option Plan").
(6) Does not include 135,000 shares held in trust for the benefit of Mr.
Sellers's children.
(7) Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of the presently exercisable
portion of options granted to such director under the Director Option Plan.
(8) Includes 1,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of the presently
exercisable portion of options granted to such director under the Director
Option Plan.
(9) Includes 32,000 shares issuable to the directors who are not employees of
the Company upon the exercise of the presently exercisable portion of
options granted to them under the Director Option Plan; 424,875 shares
issuable to the executive officers and one former executive officer upon the
exercise of presently exercisable options granted to them under the
Incentive Plan; 241,550 shares owned by spouses of four executive officers
and one former executive officer, in trusts of which officers are trustees,
or by executive officers or their spouses as custodians for their children;
and 70,850 shares issued under the Incentive Plan which have not vested.
Does not include 135,000 shares held for the benefit of the children of one
former executive officer.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
SPECIAL CHARTER PROVISION
The certificate of incorporation of Enhance Financial grants to U S WEST the
right to preclude the Company from entering into certain activities or owning an
equity interest in any entity that engages in any such activity unless they are
determined by U S WEST's legal counsel not to be prohibited to U S WEST and its
subsidiaries under the Modification of Final Judgment (the "Judgment") entered
in 1984 in connection with the settlement of the legal action entitled UNITED
STATES V. WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. These activities consist of providing
information services or long distance telephone service or manufacturing
telecommunications equipment. Pursuant to the Judgment, American Telephone and
Telegraph Company divested itself of, among other assets, its interest in what
thereafter became the seven regional
48
<PAGE>
operating companies, of which U S WEST is one. Stock certificates issued by
Enhance Financial since the date of adoption of the amendment to Enhance
Financial's charter referred to above bear a legend generally describing the
restrictions referred to in the first sentence of the preceding paragraph.
The Company has not entered, and does not intend to enter, into any of the
specified activities, and, accordingly, the aforesaid provision has not had any
material effect on the business of the Company. At such time as USWFS ceases to
own shares of Common Stock, Enhance Financial intends to propose at the next
following meeting of shareholders the elimination of the aforesaid provision
from the certificate of incorporation, which will require the vote of the
holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock outstanding.
SHAREHOLDERS' AGREEMENT
Enhance Financial and two of its shareholders, USWFS and Manufacturers Life
(the "Shareholder Parties"), are parties to the Shareholders' Agreement, which
requires each Shareholder Party to vote those shares of Common Stock owned by it
which are subject to the Shareholders' Agreement at all elections of directors
of Enhance Financial through 1998 in favor of two directors named by the other
(with adjustments in such number if the size of the board is increased above 15
members). An aggregate of 6,992,545 shares of Common Stock are subject to the
Shareholders' Agreement, of which 5,430,800 are owned by USWFS and 1,561,745 are
owned by Manufacturers Life. USWFS will continue to vote the shares of Common
Stock owned by it unless and until it delivers such shares pursuant to the terms
of the DECS or otherwise disposes of such shares.
Under the agreement if at any time through the year 2010 U S WEST is
determined by the U.S. Department of Justice or a court of competent
jurisdiction to be in violation of the Judgment by virtue of the activities of
the Company, the Company will be obligated either to (a) curtail such activities
or (b) locate a third party to repurchase the shares of Common Stock owned by
USWFS or repurchase such shares at a price equal to the fair market value
thereof as determined by an accounting firm reasonably acceptable to USWFS. See
"Special Charter Provision" above in this section.
The Shareholders' Agreement will terminate at such time as either of the
Shareholder Parties sells or otherwise disposes of all of its shares of Common
Stock subject to the Shareholders' Agreement or, if such shares are not so sold
or otherwise disposed of, in 2010 or at such earlier time, if any, that either
of the Shareholder Parties owns more than 50% of the outstanding Common Stock.
As a result of the Shareholders' Agreement, the Shareholder Parties may be
deemed to constitute a control group of Enhance Financial pursuant to the
Exchange Act.
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
The shares of Common Stock offered hereby are being registered pursuant to a
registration rights agreement, dated October 31, 1986, as amended, among
Manufacturers Life, USWFS and certain other of Enhance Financial's shareholders.
Following the offering of the Common Stock hereby, Manufacturers Life will have
one demand registration right and Manufacturers Life and U S WEST will have
unlimited piggyback registration rights, subject to certain limitations.
Substantially all of the expenses of the offering made hereby and any future
demand or piggyback registration are to be borne by Enhance Financial. The
registration rights agreement contains cross-indemnification covenants by
Enhance Financial on the one hand and the shareholder parties thereto on the
other for damages sustained and expenses incurred resulting from material
misstatements or omissions in connection with any such offering.
ADVISORY SERVICES
An affiliate of Manufacturers Life performs investment advisory services in
the ordinary course of its business for the Company. Such services are performed
pursuant to a written advisory agreement the terms and provisions of which are
no less favorable to the Company than those currently in effect in agreements
for comparable services between the Company and unaffiliated entities. For its
services, such shareholder's affiliate, Manufacturers Advisory Corp., received
fees aggregating approximately $358,000 in fiscal year 1994.
49
<PAGE>
REINSURANCE OF FSA BUSINESS
FSA, a financial guaranty insurer and 62%-owned indirect subsidiary of U S
WEST, reinsures a portion of its business with the Company, all on terms and
provisions equivalent to those in comparable transactions currently in effect
with unaffiliated entities. FSA accounted for 9.0% and 8.5% of the Company's
total gross premiums written in the year ended December 31, 1994 and the six
months ended June 30, 1995, respectively. The Company believes that it and FSA
conduct their business with each other on an arm's-length basis and with terms
no more favorable to the other than would be the case absent the aforesaid
relationship. However, no assurance can be given that conflicts of interest may
not develop in the future or that the business conducted with FSA may not
diminish in future periods regardless of whether payment of the DECS is made in
the form of shares of Common Stock. See "Business -- Reinsurance of Monoline
Financial Guaranty Insurers" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management."
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Underwriting Agreement
(the "Underwriting Agreement") among Enhance Financial, U S WEST and Salomon
Brothers Inc, U S WEST has agreed to sell to the Underwriter, and the
Underwriter has agreed to purchase, the number of DECS set forth below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
UNDERWRITER DECS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
<S> <C>
Salomon Brothers Inc........................................................................
4,900,000
-----------
-----------
</TABLE>
In the Underwriting Agreement, the Underwriter has agreed, subject to the
terms and conditions set forth therein, that the obligations of the Underwriter
are subject to certain conditions precedent and that the Underwriter will be
obligated to purchase all of the DECS offered pursuant to the DECS Prospectus if
any of the DECS are purchased.
U S WEST has been advised by the Underwriter that it proposes to offer the
DECS directly to the public initially at the public offering price set forth on
the cover of the DECS Prospectus and to certain dealers at such price less a
concession not in excess of $ per DECS. The Underwriter may allow, and such
dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $ per DECS to other
dealers. After the initial public offering, such public offering price and such
concession and reallowance may be changed.
U S WEST and Enhance Financial have agreed not to offer for sale, sell or
contract to sell, or otherwise dispose of, or announce the offering of, without
the prior written consent of the Underwriter, any shares of Common Stock or any
securities convertible into or exchangeable for, or warrants to acquire, Common
Stock for a period of days after the date of this Prospectus; provided,
however, that such restriction shall not affect the ability of (i) U S WEST,
Enhance Financial or their respective subsidiaries to take any such actions in
connection with the offering of the DECS made pursuant to the DECS Prospectus or
any exchange at maturity pursuant to the terms of the DECS or (ii) Enhance
Financial to take any such actions in connection with any employee stock option
plan, stock ownership plan or dividend reinvestment plan of Enhance Financial in
effect at the date of this Prospectus.
U S WEST has granted to the Underwriter an option, exercisable for the
30-day period after the date of the DECS Prospectus, to purchase up to an
additional 530,800 DECS from U S WEST, at the same price per DECS as the initial
DECS to be purchased by the Underwriter. The Underwriter may exercise such
option only for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, incurred in
connection with the sale of DECS offered pursuant to the DECS Prospectus.
The DECS will be a new issue of securities with no established trading
market. The Underwriter intends to make a market in the DECS, subject to
applicable laws and regulations. However, the
50
<PAGE>
Underwriter is not obligated to do so and any such market-making may be
discontinued at any time at the sole discretion of the Underwriter without
notice. Accordingly, no assurance can be given as to the liquidity of such
market.
For a description of the terms on which the DECS will be exchanged at
maturity for shares of Common Stock (or the cash equivalent) see a description
of the DECS in the DECS Prospectus.
The Underwriting Agreement provides that U S WEST and Enhance Financial will
indemnify the Underwriter against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act, or contribute to payments the Underwriter may be
required to make in respect thereof.
The Underwriter has from time to time performed various investment banking
and financial advisory services for U S WEST, Enhance Financial and their
respective affiliates, for which customary compensation has been received.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Common Stock offered hereby will be passed upon for
Enhance Financial by Samuel Bergman, Esq., Executive Vice President and General
Counsel of the Company. Mr. Bergman, together with members of his immediate
family, owns an aggregate of 3,850 shares of Common Stock and holds options to
purchase an additional 77,000 shares of Common Stock.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 1993
and 1994 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1994
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their reports relating thereto,
and have been so incorporated by reference in reliance upon such reports given
upon the authority of that firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
51
<PAGE>
GLOSSARY OF INSURANCE TERMS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Acquisition costs............ All expenses incurred by an insurance or reinsurance company
that vary with and are primarily related to the production
of business.
Asset-backed debt obligation
or asset-backed debt
security.................... A debt instrument that is supported by a pool of assets,
such as automobile loans or single-family mortgage loans.
The payments on the assets produce the revenue stream that
services the interest and principal on the asset-backed debt
obligation.
Capacity..................... The measure of an insurer's financial strength to issue
contracts of insurance, usually determined by the largest
amount acceptable on a given risk or, in certain other
situations, by the maximum volume of business it is prepared
to accept.
Cede......................... To pass on to a reinsurer all or part of the insurance
written by an insurer (the ceding insurer) with the object
of reducing the possible liability of the latter. "Cessions"
is the noun equivalent of the verb "cede."
Ceded premiums............... Premiums transferred under reinsurance policies in
connection with the transfer by an insurance company of a
portion of its insured risk to another insurer (the
reinsurer).
Ceding commission............ The consideration paid by an assuming company to a ceding
company to cover acquisition costs related to business
assumed under a reinsurance or retrocession contract.
Ceding company............... A reinsured, synonymous with cedent.
Combined ratio............... The sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio on either a
SAP or a GAAP basis, as the case may be.
Contingency reserve.......... A reserve used in SAP accounting designed to protect
policyholders against the effect of excessive losses
occurring during adverse economic cycles.
Credit enhancement........... A form of financial guaranty whereby the quality of a
security is upgraded through the use of an insurance policy
or letter of credit.
Credit rating................ An alphabetic system used by major rating agencies to
categorize the creditworthiness of an issuer of a specific
obligation. A credit rating of BBB or Baa or better is
considered an investment grade rating, meaning the
securities have been analyzed and are regarded as having
adequate capacity to provide timely payment of debt service.
A credit rating below BBB or Baa is considered a speculative
grade rating, meaning there is a greater vulnerability to
default.
Earned premium............... The portion of net premiums that is recognized as income
during a given period. The amount of earned premium in a
given period is determined differently under SAP and under
GAAP.
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Excess of loss reinsurance
(also known as "non-
proportional
reinsurance")............... A generic term describing reinsurance which, subject to a
specified limit, indemnifies the ceding company against all
or a portion of the amount in excess of a specified
retention. The term includes various types of reinsurance,
such as catastrophe reinsurance, per risk reinsurance, per
occurrence reinsurance, and aggregate excess of loss
reinsurance and should not be confused with "surplus share,"
which always refers to a pro rata form of reinsurance.
Export financing............. Transactions that finance the export of goods. The guarantor
typically guaranties the payment obligation of the importer
or buyer of certain specified goods, which obligation can
extend for up to several years.
Facultative reinsurance...... Involves individual risks offered to the reinsurer which the
latter is under no obligation to accept.
Financial guaranty........... The promise to make payments to the holders of a debt, loan
or other similar financial instrument in the event the
borrower or underlying obligor fails to do so.
GAAP......................... Generally accepted accounting principles as defined by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board and other recognized
accounting literature. See "SAP."
GAAP expense ratio........... The quotient derived by dividing underwriting and operating
expenses by net premiums earned.
Gross premiums written....... All premiums arising from policies issued and from
reinsurance business assumed.
Guarantor.................... The entity, such as an insurance company, that promises to
pay on an obligation in the event the obligor fails to do
so.
Incurred losses.............. Losses which have already occurred and which have or will
result in a claim under the terms of an insurance policy or
a reinsurance agreement.
Insurance in force or
exposure.................... Principal outstanding and interest to be paid over the
remaining life of a given obligation in respect of
obligations insured and reinsured by the Company, net of
refunded debt obligations, retrocessions, redemptions and
repayments.
Issuer....................... A municipality or corporation or other entity that is the
obligor on a debt issuance to the capital markets.
Leverage ratio............... The ratio of insurance in force to qualified statutory
capital.
Loss adjustment expenses or
LAE......................... The estimated expenses of settling claims, including legal
and other fees and general expenses.
Loss ratio................... The quotient derived by dividing losses and loss adjustment
expenses incurred by net premiums earned on either a SAP or
a GAAP basis, as the case may be.
</TABLE>
53
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Loss reserve................. For an individual loss, an estimate of the amount the
insurer expects to pay for the reported claim. For total
losses, estimates of expected payments for reported and
unreported claims. May include amounts for loss adjustment
expenses. See "Incurred losses."
Monoline financial guaranty
insurer..................... A property/casualty insurer which operates in areas of bond
insurance and closely related lines, and which has no
exposure resulting from other general property/casualty
lines of business. Monoline financial guaranty insurer
traditionally referred to a writer of municipal bond
insurance, but currently includes, as well, insurers of
asset-backed debt obligations.
Net premiums written......... Total premiums for insurance written and reinsurance assumed
during a given period less total premiums for insurance and
reinsurance ceded to others during such period.
Obligor...................... The entity required to make payments under a debt, loan or
other similar financial instrument.
Policyholders' or statutory
surplus..................... The excess of total assets over total liabilities,
determined in accordance with SAP.
Premiums earned.............. The portion of net premiums written during or prior to a
given period which was actually earned during such period.
Proportional reinsurance..... A generic term describing all forms of reinsurance in which
the reinsurer shares an agreed percentage of original
premiums and losses (usually from first dollar of loss) of
the ceding company. Proportional reinsurance is usually in
the form of quota share reinsurance but may also be in the
form of surplus share.
Qualified statutory
capital..................... The sum of policyholders' or statutory surplus and
contingency reserves.
Quota share.................. A form of proportional reinsurance in which the reinsurer
assumes an agreed percentage of each risk being insured and
shares all premiums and losses accordingly with the
reinsured.
Reclamation bond............. With respect to strip coal mines, an obligation to pay for
the restoration of the mine site in accordance with
applicable state and federal regulations should the insured
(the miner) fail to do so. The financial obligation is up
to, but does not exceed the stated amount of the reclamation
bond.
Reinsurance.................. The practice whereby one party, called the reinsurer or
assuming company, in consideration of a premium paid to such
party, agrees to indemnify another party, called the ceding
company, for part or all of the liability of the ceding
company under a policy or policies of insurance which it has
issued.
Residual value insurance..... Insurance that guaranties a minimum value for an asset or
pool of assets at a particular point in time, such as at the
expiration date of a lease with respect to such asset or
assets.
Retrocession................. The transaction whereby a reinsurer cedes to another
reinsurer (the retrocessionaire) all or part of the
reinsurance the ceding insurer has previously assumed.
</TABLE>
54
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
SAP.......................... Statutory Accounting Practices required by state law which
must be followed by insurance companies in submitting their
financial statements to state insurance departments. These
differ from GAAP in some important respects.
Surety....................... A line of insurance in which the obligor promises to perform
the obligations of a third party under a contractual
agreement should the third party fail to do so. A surety is
similar in form to a financial guaranty, the essential
difference being that financial guaranties apply to
third-party obligations which are of a financial nature.
Surplus share................ A form of proportional reinsurance indemnifying the ceding
company against loss for the surplus liability ceded.
Treaty reinsurance........... A form of reinsurance which is effected through a single
contract for a period of time, usually one year, under which
the reinsurer agrees, in advance, to accept an agreed
portion, on either a pro-rata or excess basis, of an
enumerated type of risk insured by the reinsured during the
period.
Underwriting................. The insurer's or reinsurer's process of reviewing
submissions for insurance coverage, deciding whether to
accept all or part of the coverage requested and determining
the applicable premiums; also refers to the acceptance of
such coverage.
Underwriting expense......... The aggregate of the portion of administrative, general, and
other expenses attributable to insurance underwriting
operations.
Unearned premiums............ A reserve account that contains the portion of premium
attributable to the unexpired period of policies that has
been collected by an insurer but has not yet been recognized
as earned premiums and accounted for as revenues.
</TABLE>
55
<PAGE>
NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE
ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN
THIS PROSPECTUS IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER MADE BY THIS PROSPECTUS AND, IF
GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS
HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS
NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES CREATE AN IMPLICATION
THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE FACTS. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION BY ANYONE IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR
SOLICITATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED OR IN WHICH THE PERSON MAKING SUCH OFFER OR
SOLICITATION IS NOT QUALIFIED TO DO SO OR TO ANYONE TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO
MAKE SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION.
------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
---------
<S> <C>
Available Information.......................... 2
Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference..................................... 2
Prospectus Summary............................. 4
Risk Factors................................... 7
Use of Proceeds................................ 10
Price Range of Common Stock and Dividends...... 11
Capitalization................................. 12
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial
Information................................... 13
Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.................................... 14
Financial Guaranty Industry Overview........... 21
Business....................................... 25
Accounting..................................... 40
Insurance Regulatory Matters................... 41
Directors and Executive Officers............... 44
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management................................ 47
Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.................................. 48
Plan of Distribution........................... 50
Legal Matters.................................. 51
Experts........................................ 51
Glossary of Insurance Terms.................... 52
</TABLE>
4,900,000 SHARES
ENHANCE FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP INC.
COMMON STOCK
($.10 PAR VALUE)
[LOGO]
PROSPECTUS
DATED , 1995
<PAGE>
NO DEALER, SALESMAN OR ANY OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION, OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS, OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR THE PROSPECTUS, IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER CONTAINED
IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE PROSPECTUS, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH
INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED
BY U S WEST OR ANY UNDERWRITER. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT AND THE PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER AND THEREUNDER SHALL
UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES CREATE AN IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN
THE AFFAIRS OF U S WEST SINCE THE DATE HEREOF. THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND
THE PROSPECTUS ARE NOT AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY
SECURITY IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER OR
SOLICITATION.
-------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
---------
<S> <C>
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
Risk Factors Relating to DECS................. S-3
U S WEST, Inc................................. S-5
Enhance Financial Services Group Inc.......... S-6
Relationship Between U S WEST and Enhance..... S-7
Capitalization................................ S-8
Summary Financial Data........................ S-9
Price Range and Dividend History of Enhance
Common Stock................................ S-10
Use of Proceeds............................... S-10
Description of the DECS....................... S-11
Certain United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations.............................. S-17
Plan of Distribution.......................... S-20
Legal Opinions................................ S-21
PROSPECTUS
Available Information......................... 2
Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference................................... 3
U S WEST, Inc................................. 4
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges............ 5
Use of Proceeds............................... 5
Description of Debt Securities................ 5
Plan of Distribution.......................... 10
Legal Opinions................................ 11
Experts....................................... 11
Appendix A
</TABLE>
4,900,000 DECS-SM-
(DEBT EXCHANGEABLE FOR
COMMON STOCK-SM-)
U S WEST, INC.
% EXCHANGEABLE NOTES
DUE , 1998
[LOGO]
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
DATED , 1995
- ------------------------------------------
SALOMON BROTHERS INC
- ------------------------------
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Securities and Exchange Commission Filing Fee.................... $ 172,415
Rating Agency Fees............................................... 100,000
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses....................................... 20,000
Trustee's Expenses............................................... 30,000
Printing and Engraving Fees...................................... 100,000
Accounting Fees and Expenses..................................... 25,000
Legal Fees and Expenses.......................................... 100,000
Miscellaneous.................................................... 2,585
---------
Total........................................................ $ 550,000
---------
---------
</TABLE>
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
The By-laws of U S WEST provide for the indemnification of directors and
officers to the extent permissible under applicable law. Sections 7-109-101
through 7-109-110 of the Colorado Business Corporation Act (the "CBCA") specify
the circumstances under which a corporation may indemnify its directors,
officers, employees, fiduciaries or agents. For acts done in a person's
"official capacity," the CBCA generally requires that an act be done in good
faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the
corporation. In all other civil cases, the person must have acted in good faith
and in a way that was not opposed to the corporation's best interests. In
criminal actions or proceedings, the CBCA imposes an additional requirement that
the actor had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. In any
proceeding by or in the right of the corporation, or charging a person with the
improper receipt of a personal benefit, no indemnification can be made, except
that in a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation, indemnification for
reasonable expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding is permitted.
Indemnification is mandatory when any director or officer is wholly successful,
on the merits or otherwise, in defending any civil or criminal proceeding.
The directors and officers of U S WEST are covered by insurance policies
indemnifying against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), which might
be incurred by them in such capacities and against which they cannot be
indemnified by U S WEST.
Any agents, dealers or underwriters who execute an underwriting or other
distribution agreement in connection with an offering of Debt Securities will
agree to indemnify U S WEST's directors and their officers who signed the
registration statement against certain liabilities which might arise under the
Securities Act with respect to information furnished to U S WEST by or on behalf
of any such indemnifying party.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS.
Exhibits identified in parentheses below are on file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and are incorporated herein by reference to such previous
filings. All other exhibits are provided
as part of this electronic transmission.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
*4-A -- Form of Indenture between U S WEST, Inc. and The First National Bank of
Chicago, as Trustee
**4-B -- Form of Supplemental Indenture between U S WEST, Inc. and The First
National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee, for an offering of Debt Exchangeable
for Common Stock
*5 -- Opinion of Stephen E. Brilz
</TABLE>
II-1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
(12) -- Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges of U S WEST, Inc.
(Exhibit 12 to Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 1994 and Exhibit
12 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 1995, File No. 1-8611)
*23-A -- Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
*23-B -- Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
*23-C -- Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
*23-D -- Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
*23-E -- Consent of Stephen E. Brilz is contained in the opinion of counsel filed
as Exhibit 5
*24 -- Powers of Attorney
*25 -- Statement of Eligibility under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as
amended, of The First National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee under the
Indenture
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Filed previously.
** To be filed by amendment.
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.
The Registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act, each filing of U S WEST's Annual Report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") (and where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act) that is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
Registrant pursuant to the provisions referred to in Item 15 (other than the
insurance policies referred to therein), or otherwise, the Registrant has been
advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.
The Registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made,
a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement
(i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act;
(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after
the effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in
the Registration Statement;
(iii) to include any material information with respect to the Plan of
Distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or
any material change to such information in the Registration Statement;
II-2
<PAGE>
provided, however, that the undertakings set forth in paragraphs (i) and
(ii) above do not apply if the information required to be included in a
post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports
filed by U S WEST, Inc. pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act that are incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a
new Registration Statement relating to the securities offered therein, and
the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the
initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment
any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.
The Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of a
registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form
of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or
497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of the
registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purposes of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-3
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, U S WEST, INC.
CERTIFIES THAT IT HAS REASONABLE GROUNDS TO BELIEVE THAT IT MEETS ALL THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING ON FORM S-3 AND HAS DULY CAUSED THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED,
THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED, IN THE CITY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO, ON THE 6TH
DAY OF OCTOBER, 1995.
U S WEST, Inc.
By /s/ STEPHEN E. BRILZ
------------------------------------
Stephen E. Brilz
Assistant Secretary
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, THIS
REGISTRATION STATEMENT OR AMENDMENT THERETO HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE
FOLLOWING DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF U S WEST, INC. IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE
DATE INDICATED.
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER:
RICHARD D. MCCORMICK* Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief
Executive Officer
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER:
JAMES T. ANDERSON* Acting Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer
DIRECTORS:
RICHARD B. CHENEY*
REMEDIOS DIAZ-OLIVER*
GRANT A. DOVE*
ALLAN D. GILMOUR*
PIERSON M. GRIEVE*
SHIRLEY M. HUFSTEDLER*
ALLEN F. JACOBSON*
RICHARD D. MCCORMICK*
MARILYN CARLSON NELSON*
FRANK POPOFF*
JERRY O. WILLIAMS*
*By /s/ STEPHEN E.
BRILZ
----------------------------------
Stephen E. Brilz
Attorney-in-Fact
Dated: October 6, 1995
II-4
