<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Commission File Number 1-9240
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Nevada 94-6565852
- ------------------------------- -------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)
10670 North Central Expressway, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75231
- -------------------------------------------------------- ----------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(214) 692-4700
----------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of each exchange on
Title of each class which registered
- ------------------------------ ----------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. [X]
As of March 6, 1998, the Registrant had 3,889,200 shares of Common Stock
outstanding. Of the total shares outstanding 2,128,945 were held by other than
those who may be deemed to be affiliates, for an aggregate value of $33,531,000
based on the last trade as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on March 6,
1998. The basis of this calculation does not constitute a determination by the
Registrant that all of such persons or entities are affiliates of the
Registrant as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Consolidated Financial Statements of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
Commission File No. 1-9525
1
<PAGE> 2
INDEX TO
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
PART I
Item 1. Business............................................. 3
Item 2. Properties........................................... 7
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.................................... 24
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders........................................... 25
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters............................... 26
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.............................. 27
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations............... 28
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.......... 36
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure............... 71
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Advisor of the
Registrant........................................ 71
Item 11. Executive Compensation............................... 80
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management........................................ 83
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions....... 84
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statements,
Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K................. 87
Signature Page................................................... 89
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (the "Company" or the "Registrant"), a
Nevada corporation, is the successor to a California business trust, which was
organized on September 6, 1983 and commenced operations on January 31, 1984.
The Company has elected to be treated as a Real Estate Investment Trust
("REIT") under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the "Code"). The Company has, in the opinion of the Company's
management, qualified for federal taxation as a REIT for each year subsequent
to December 31, 1983.
The Company's real estate at December 31, 1997 consisted of 62 properties held
for investment, six partnership properties and five properties held for sale
which were primarily obtained through foreclosure. Fifteen of the Company's
properties held for investment were purchased during 1997. The Company's
mortgage notes receivable portfolio at December 31, 1997 consisted of 20
mortgage loans. In addition, the Company has an interest in a partnership
which holds a wraparound mortgage loan. The Company's real estate and mortgage
notes receivable portfolios are more fully discussed in ITEM 2. "PROPERTIES."
Business Plan and Investment Policy
The Company's primary business and only industry segment is investing in equity
interests in real estate through direct acquisitions, partnerships and
financing real estate and real estate related activities through investments in
mortgage loans, including first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans. The
Company's real estate is located throughout the continental United States.
Information regarding the real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios
of the Company is set forth in ITEM 2. "PROPERTIES", and in Schedules III and
IV to the Consolidated Financial Statements included at ITEM 8. "FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA."
The Company's business is not seasonal. The Company has determined to continue
to pursue a balanced investment policy, seeking both current income and capital
appreciation. With respect to new real estate investments, the Company's plan
of operation is to consider all types of real estate, but in an attempt to
bring balance to its real estate portfolio, the Company will focus on
apartments, primarily located in the Southeast and Southwest regions of the
United States. In making any new real estate investments, emphasis will be on
acquiring properties generating current cash flow. The Company expects to
continue to invest in and improve these assets to maximize both their immediate
and longer term value.
The Company expects to consider property sales opportunities for properties in
stabilized real estate markets where the Company's properties have reached
their potential. The Company may also be an opportunistic seller of properties
in markets that have become overheated, i.e. an abundance of buyers.
3
<PAGE> 4
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued)
Business Plan and Investment Policy (Continued)
The Company's operating strategy with regard to its properties is to maximize
each property's operating income by aggressive property management through
closely monitoring expenses while at the same time making property renovations
and/or improvements where appropriate. While such expenditures increase the
amount of revenue required to cover operating expenses, the Company's
management believes that such expenditures are necessary to maintain or enhance
the value of the Company's properties.
The Company has determined that in 1998 it will seek to fund or acquire new
mortgage loans to take advantage of favorable interest rate spreads or profit
participation opportunities. The Company may also originate mortgage loans in
conjunction with providing purchase money financing of a property sale. The
Company intends to service and hold for investment the mortgage notes in its
portfolio. The Company may, however, borrow against its mortgage notes
receivable using the proceeds from such borrowings to fund additional mortgage
loans or for general working capital needs of the Company. The Company also
intends to pursue its rights vigorously with respect to mortgage notes that are
in default. The Company's Articles of Incorporation impose no limitations on
the Company's investment policy with respect to mortgage loans and do not
prohibit the Company from investing more than a specified percentage of its
assets in any one mortgage loan.
The Company's Board of Directors currently intends to continue its policy of
prohibiting the Company from incurring aggregate secured and unsecured
indebtedness in excess of 300% of the Company's net asset value (defined as the
book value of all assets of the Company minus all of its liabilities); however,
the Board of Directors may alter such policy at any time.
Management of the Company
Although the Company's Board of Directors is directly responsible for managing
the affairs of the Company and for setting the policies which guide it, the
day-to-day operations of the Company are performed by Basic Capital Management,
Inc. ("BCM" or the "Advisor"), a contractual advisor under the supervision of
the Company's Board of Directors. The duties of the Advisor include, among
other things, locating, investigating, evaluating and recommending real estate
and mortgage note investment and sales opportunities, as well as financing and
refinancing sources for the Company. The Advisor also serves as a consultant
in connection with the Company's business plan and investment decisions made by
the Company's Board of Directors.
BCM is a company owned by a trust for the benefit of the children of Gene E.
Phillips. Mr. Phillips served as a Director of the Company until December 31,
1992. Mr. Phillips also served as a director of BCM until December 22, 1989
and as Chief Executive Officer of BCM until September 1, 1992. Mr. Phillips
serves as a representative of his children's trust which owns BCM and, in such
capacity, has substantial contact with the management of BCM and input with
respect to its
4
<PAGE> 5
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued)
Management of the Company (Continued)
performance of advisory services to the Company. BCM is more fully described
in ITEM 10. "DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT - The
Advisor."
BCM has been providing advisory services to the Company since March 28, 1989.
Renewal of BCM's advisory agreement with the Company was approved by the
Company's stockholders at the Company's annual meeting of stockholders held on
May 8, 1997. BCM also serves as advisor to Continental Mortgage and Equity
Trust ("CMET") and Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. ("IORI"). The
Directors of the Company are also trustees or directors of CMET and IORI and
the officers of the Company are also officers of CMET and IORI. Mr. Phillips
is a general partner of Syntek Asset Management, L.P. ("SAMLP"), the general
partner of National Realty, L.P. ("NRLP") and National Operating, L.P.
("NOLP"), the operating partnership of NRLP. BCM performs certain
administrative functions for NRLP and NOLP on a cost-reimbursement basis. BCM
also serves as advisor to American Realty Trust, Inc. ("ART"). Mr. Phillips
served as Chairman of the Board and as a director of ART until November 16,
1992. Randall M. Paulson, President of the Company, also serves as President
of BCM, CMET and IORI, Executive Vice President of ART, and as the President
and sole director of Syntek Asset Management, Inc. ("SAMI"), which is the
managing general partner of SAMLP. The officers of the Company are also
officers of ART and SAMI. As of March 6, 1998, the Company owned approximately
22.5% of IORI's outstanding shares of common stock and ART owned approximately
30.7% of the outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock and approximately
29.8% of IORI's outstanding shares of common stock.
Since February 1, 1990, affiliates of BCM have provided property management
services to the Company. Currently, Carmel Realty Services, Ltd. ("Carmel,
Ltd.") provides such property management services. Carmel, Ltd. subcontracts
with other entities for the provision of property-level management services to
the Company. The general partner of Carmel, Ltd. is BCM. The limited partners
of Carmel, Ltd. are (i) First Equity Properties, Inc. ("First Equity"), which
is 50% owned by BCM, (ii) Gene E. Phillips and (iii) a trust for the benefit of
the children of Mr. Phillips. Carmel, Ltd. subcontracts the property-level
management and leasing of 26 of the Company's commercial properties and its
hotel and the commercial properties owned by a real estate partnership in which
the Company and IORI are partners to Carmel Realty, Inc. ("Carmel Realty"),
which is a company owned by First Equity. Carmel Realty is entitled to receive
property and construction management fees and leasing commissions in accordance
with the terms of its property-level management agreement with Carmel, Ltd.
Carmel Realty is also entitled to receive real estate brokerage commissions in
accordance with the terms of a non-exclusive brokerage agreement as discussed
in ITEM 10. "DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT - The
Advisor."
The Company has no employees. Employees of the Advisor render services to the
Company.
5
<PAGE> 6
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued)
Competition
The real estate business is highly competitive and the Company competes with
numerous entities engaged in real estate activities (including certain entities
described in ITEM 13. "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS - Related
Party Transactions"), some of which may have greater financial resources than
those of the Company. The Company's management believes that success against
such competition is dependent upon the geographic location of the property, the
performance of property managers in areas such as marketing, collections and
the ability to control operating expenses, the amount of new construction in
the area and the maintenance and appearance of the property. Additional
competitive factors with respect to commercial properties are the ease of
access to the property, the adequacy of related facilities, such as parking,
and sensitivity to market conditions in setting rent levels. With respect to
apartments, competition is also based upon the design and mix of the units and
the ability to provide a community atmosphere for the tenants. The Company's
management believes that general economic circumstances and trends and new or
renovated properties in the vicinity of each of the Company's properties are
also competitive factors.
To the extent that the Company seeks to sell any of its properties, the sales
prices for such properties may be affected by competition from other real
estate entities and financial institutions also attempting to sell their
properties located in areas in which the Company's properties are located, as
well as by aggressive buyers attempting to penetrate or dominate a particular
market.
As described above and in ITEM 13. "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS - Related Party Transactions", the officers and Directors of the
Company also serve as officers or trustees or directors of certain other
entities, each of which is also advised by BCM, and each of which has business
objectives similar to those of the Company. The Company's Directors, officers
and Advisor owe fiduciary duties to such other entities as well as to the
Company under applicable law. In determining to which entity a particular
investment opportunity will be allocated, the officers, directors or trustees
and the Advisor consider the respective investment objectives of each such
entity and the appropriateness of a particular investment in light of each such
entity's existing real estate portfolio. To the extent that any particular
investment opportunity is appropriate to more than one of such entities, such
investment opportunity will be allocated to the entity which has had funds
available for investment for the longest period of time or, if appropriate, the
investment may be shared among all or some of such entities.
In addition, as also described in ITEM 13. "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS - Certain Business Relationships," the Company also competes with
other entities which are affiliates of the Advisor and which may have
investment objectives similar to the Company's and that may compete with the
Company in purchasing, selling, leasing and financing of real estate and real
estate related investments. In resolving any potential conflicts of interest
which may arise, the
6
<PAGE> 7
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued)
Competition (Continued)
Advisor has informed the Company that it intends to continue to exercise its
best judgment as to what is fair and reasonable under the circumstances in
accordance with applicable law.
Certain Factors Associated with Real Estate and Related Investments
The Company is subject to all the risks incident to ownership and financing of
real estate and interests therein, many of which relate to the general
illiquidity of real estate investments. These risks include, but are not
limited to, changes in general or local economic conditions, changes in
interest rates and the availability of permanent mortgage financing which may
render the acquisition, sale or refinancing of a property difficult or
unattractive and which may make debt service burdensome, changes in real estate
and zoning laws, increases in real estate taxes, federal or local economic or
rent controls, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes and other acts of God and other
factors beyond the control of the Company's management or Advisor. The
illiquidity of real estate investments may also impair the ability of the
Company to respond promptly to changing circumstances. The Company's
management believes that such risks are partially mitigated by the
diversification by geographic region and property type of the Company's real
estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios. However, to the extent new
property investments or mortgage lending is concentrated in any particular
region or property type, the advantages of diversification may be mitigated.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company's principal offices are located at 10670 North Central Expressway,
Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75231. In the opinion of the Company's management,
the Company's offices are suitable and adequate for its present operations.
Details of the Company's real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios
at December 31, 1997, are set forth in Schedules III and IV, respectively, to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included at ITEM 8. "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA." The discussions set forth below under the headings
"Real Estate" and "Mortgage Loans" provide certain summary information
concerning the Company's real estate and mortgage notes receivable portfolios.
The Company's real estate portfolio consists of properties held for investment,
properties held for sale, primarily obtained through foreclosure of the
collateral securing mortgage notes receivable and investment in partnerships.
The discussion set forth below under the heading "Real Estate" provides certain
summary information concerning the Company's real estate and further summary
information with respect to the Company's properties held for investment,
properties held for sale and its investment in partnerships.
7
<PAGE> 8
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
At December 31, 1997, none of the Company's properties, mortgage notes
receivable or investment in partnerships exceeded 10% or more of the Company's
total assets. At December 31, 1997, 85% of the Company's assets consisted of
properties held for investment, 2% consisted of properties held for sale, 1%
consisted of mortgage notes and interest receivable and 1% consisted of
investment in partnerships. The remaining 11% of the Company's assets at
December 31, 1997 were invested in cash, cash equivalents and other assets.
The percentage of the Company's assets invested in any one category is subject
to change and no assurance can be given that the composition of the Company's
assets in the future will approximate the percentages listed above.
The Company's real estate is geographically diverse. At December 31, 1997, the
Company held investments in apartments and commercial properties in each of the
geographic regions of the continental United States, although its apartments and
commercial properties are concentrated in the Southeast and Southwest regions,
as shown more specifically in the table under "Real Estate" below. At December
31, 1997, the Company held mortgage notes receivable secured by apartments in
the Southwest region and commercial properties in the Southeast region of the
continental United States, as shown more specifically in the table under
"Mortgage Loans" below.
To continue to qualify for federal taxation as a REIT under the Code, the
Company is required, among other things, to hold at least 75% of the value of
its total assets in real estate assets, government securities, cash and cash
equivalents at the close of each quarter of each taxable year.
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
8
<PAGE> 9
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Geographic Regions
The Company has divided the continental United States into the following six
geographic regions.
Northeast region comprised of the states of Connecticut, Delaware,
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island and Vermont, and the District of Columbia. The Company owns 3
apartments and 1 commercial property in this region.
Southeast region comprised of the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. The
Company owns 4 apartments and 10 commercial properties in this region.
Southwest region comprised of the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana,
New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. The Company owns 17 apartments and 8
commercial properties in this region.
Midwest region comprised of the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio,
South Dakota, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The Company owns 3 commercial
properties in this region.
Mountain region comprised of the states of Colorado, Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. The Company owns 2 commercial properties in this
region.
Pacific region comprised of the states of California, Oregon and
Washington. The Company owns 4 apartments, 1 hotel and 3 commercial
properties in this region.
Excluded from the above are six parcels of unimproved land, as described below.
Real Estate
At December 31, 1997, over 87% of the Company's assets were invested in real
estate. The Company invests in real estate located throughout the continental
United States, either on a leveraged or nonleveraged basis. The Company's real
estate portfolio consists of properties held for investment, investment in
partnerships and properties held for sale (which were primarily obtained
through foreclosure of the collateral securing mortgage notes receivable).
Types of Real Estate Investments. The Company's real estate consists of
commercial properties (a hotel, office buildings, industrial warehouses and
shopping centers) and apartments or similar properties having established
income-producing capabilities. In selecting new real estate investments, the
location, age and type of property, gross rentals,
9
<PAGE> 10
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
lease terms, financial and business standing of tenants, operating expenses,
fixed charges, land values and physical condition are among the factors
considered. The Company may acquire properties subject to or assume existing
debt and may mortgage, pledge or otherwise obtain financing for its
properties. The Company's Board of Directors may alter the types of and
criteria for selecting new real estate investments and for obtaining financing
without a vote of stockholders.
The Company has typically invested in developed real estate, and has no current
intentions to do otherwise, the Company may, however also invest in new
construction or development either directly or in partnership with
nonaffiliated parties or affiliates (subject to approval by the Company's Board
of Directors). To the extent that the Company invests in construction and
development projects, the Company would be subject to business risks, such as
cost overruns and construction delays, associated with such higher risk
projects.
At December 31, 1997, the Company had no properties on which significant
capital improvements were in process.
In the opinion of the Company's management, the properties owned by the Company
are adequately covered by insurance.
The following table sets forth the percentages, by property type and geographic
region, of the Company's real estate (other than a hotel in the Pacific region
and six parcels of unimproved land, as described below) at December 31, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Commercial
Region Apartments Properties
------ ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Pacific ............ 6% 7%
Midwest ............ -- 11
Northeast .......... 13 3
Southwest .......... 62 30
Southeast .......... 19 44
Mountain ........... -- 5
---------- ----------
100% 100%
</TABLE>
The foregoing table is based solely on the number of apartment units and amount
of commercial square footage owned by the Company and does not reflect the value
of the Company's investment in each region. The Company also owns six parcels
of unimproved land, 3 parcels of 4.79 acres, 4.66 acres and 80 acres in the
Southeast region and 3 parcels containing .9250 of an acre, 4.7 acres and 8.844
acres, in the Southwest region, all of which, other than the last two parcels,
are held for sale. See Schedule III to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included at ITEM 8. "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA" for a more
detailed description of the Company's real estate portfolio.
10
<PAGE> 11
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
A summary of activity in the Company's owned real estate portfolio during 1997
is as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Owned properties in real estate portfolio at January
1, 1997................................................ 51
Properties purchased..................................... 15
Properties sold.......................................... (5)
Land parcels retained at sale............................ 2
Property released........................................ (1)
-----
Owned properties in real estate portfolio at December
31, 1997............................................... 62
=====
</TABLE>
Investment Properties. Set forth below are the Company's investment properties
and the monthly rental rate for apartments and the average annual rental rate
for commercial properties and occupancy thereof at December 31, 1997, 1996 and
1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Rent Per
Square Foot Occupancy %
Units/ ---------------------- ----------------------
Property Location Square Footage 1997 1996 1995 1997 1996 1995
- ----------------- -------------- -------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Apartments
- ----------
Arbor Point Odessa, TX 195 Units/
178,920 Sq. Ft. $ .41 $ .37 $ * 85 65 *
Carseka Los Angeles, CA 54 Units/
37,068 Sq. Ft. .97 .93 * 98 100 *
Country Bend Fort Worth, TX 166 Units/
143,366 Sq. Ft. .54 * * 92 * *
Coventry Midland, TX 120 Units/
105,608 Sq. Ft. .39 .37 * 96 92 *
Crescent Place Houston, TX 120 Units/
95,464 Sq. Ft. .57 * * 93 * *
Fairpark Los Angeles, CA 49 Units/
43,331 Sq. Ft. .24 * * 91 * *
Fountain Village Tucson, AZ 410 Units/
363,079 Sq. Ft. .65 .65 .65 93 93 93
Gladstell Forest Conroe, TX 168 Units/
121,536 Sq. Ft. .67 .65 .62 92 92 94
Harper's Ferry Lafayette, LA 122 Units/
112,500 Sq. Ft. .51 .48 .47 97 96 94
Heritage Tulsa, OK 136 Units/
92,464 Sq. Ft. .64 .62 .60 95 95 94
Mariners Pointe St. Petersburg, FL 368 Units/
310,494 Sq. Ft. .51 .51 .49 85 89 91
Sandstone Mesa, AZ 238 Units/
146,320 Sq. Ft. .30 * * 93 * *
Shadow Run Pinellas Park, FL 276 Units/
216,400 Sq. Ft. .74 .71 .70 97 96 98
South Cochran Los Angeles, CA 64 Units/
43,100 Sq. Ft. .96 .93 .93 96 96 97
Southgate Odessa, TX 180 Units/
151,656 Sq. Ft. .43 .39 * 87 63 *
Spa Cove Annapolis, MD 303 Units/
305,989 Sq. Ft. .77 .75 .75 94 93 95
Summerfield Orlando, FL 224 Units/
203,940 Sq. Ft. .63 .59 .56 93 92 89
Summerstone Houston, TX 242 Units/
188,734 Sq. Ft. .61 .59 .57 93 94 96
Sunchase Odessa, TX 300 Units/
223,048 Sq. Ft. .43 * * 90 * *
</TABLE>
11
<PAGE> 12
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Rent Per
Square Foot/
Units/ Average Room Rate Occupancy %
Square Footage/ ----------------------- ------------------------
Property Location Rooms/Acres 1997 1996 1995 1997 1996 1995
- ----------------- -------------- --------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Apartments - Continued
- ----------
Terrace Hills El Paso, TX 310 Units/
233,192 Sq. Ft. $ .58 $ * $ * 95 * *
Timbers Tyler, TX 180 Units/
101,666 Sq. Ft. .54 * * 92 * *
Treehouse Irving, TX 160 Units/
153,072 Sq. Ft. .62 * * 99 * *
Villas at Sterling, VA 102 Units/
Countryside 92,840 Sq. Ft. .94 * * 96 * *
Villa Piedra Los Angeles, CA 132 Units/
81,700 Sq. Ft. .30 * * 89 * *
Westgate of Laurel Laurel, MD 218 Units/
201,704 Sq. Ft. .82 .81 .80 96 96 94
Westwood Odessa, TX 79 Units/
49,001 Sq. Ft. .45 .40 * 87 65 *
Woodland Hills San Antonio, TX 96 Units/
57,800 Sq. Ft. .66 .66 .64 86 90 94
Woods Edge Rockville, MD 162 Units/
146,460 Sq. Ft. .95 .93 .93 94 93 94
Office Buildings
- ----------------
74 New Montgomery San Francisco, CA 114,952 Sq. Ft. 16.18 14.88 14.67 97 92 89
Bonita Plaza Bonita, CA 47,777 Sq. Ft. 20.81 * * 61 * *
Chesapeake Ridge San Diego, CA 100,484 Sq. Ft. 13.86 13.28 9.76 100 100 100
Corporate Pointe Chantilly, VA 65,918 Sq. Ft. 13.69 13.41 13.07 100 100 100
Forum Richmond, VA 80,941 Sq. Ft. 14.64 14.02 13.38 96 100 98
Hartford Dallas, TX 174,727 Sq. Ft. 8.86 9.44 9.55 46 46 50
Institute Place
Lofts Chicago, IL 142,215 Sq. Ft. 12.95 12.31 13.14 86 75 73
Lexington Center Colorado
Springs, CO 74,603 Sq. Ft. 9.57 * * 60 * *
One Steeplechase Sterling, VA 103,376 Sq. Ft. 15.24 14.75 14.32 100 100 100
Plaza Towers St. Petersburg, FL 188,218 Sq. Ft. 12.77 12.15 11.84 96 88 82
Savings of America Houston, TX 68,634 Sq. Ft. 11.16 * * 90 * *
Town and Country Houston, TX 64,089 Sq. Ft. 4.80 4.47 4.18 76 67 62
Venture Center Atlanta, GA 38,271 Sq. Ft. 13.07 12.67 12.10 100 94 89
Waterstreet Boulder, CO 106,211 Sq. Ft. 16.73 15.60 14.70 99 96 99
Industrial Warehouses
- ---------------------
Corporate Center
at Beaumeade Ashburn, VA 178,492 Sq. Ft. 5.93 5.64 5.19 98 80 51
Denton Drive Dallas, TX 123,800 Sq. Ft. 2.01 1.34 1.34 75 100 100
Encon Warehouse Fort Worth, TX 279,290 Sq. Ft. 1.66 * * 100 * *
Parke Long Chantilly, VA 222,197 Sq. Ft. 6.15 5.32 5.61 87 80 71
Technology Trading
Center Sterling, VA 199,582 Sq. Ft. 5.10 5.26 4.83 70 78 77
Texstar Arlington, TX 97,846 Sq. Ft. 2.11 1.86 1.86 100 100 100
Tricon Warehouses Atlanta, GA 570,808 Sq. Ft. 3.44 3.29 3.05 91 93 98
Shopping Centers
- ----------------
Dunes Plaza Michigan City, IN 223,938 Sq. Ft. 4.58 4.49 4.40 77 82 85
Northtown Mall Dallas, TX 354,174 Sq. Ft. 2.92 3.13 3.85 78 82 81
Parkway Center Dallas, TX 28,228 Sq. Ft. 13.00 12.01 11.24 100 94 94
Sadler Square Amelia Island, FL 73,396 Sq. Ft. 6.76 6.54 6.14 96 95 92
Sheboygan Sheboygan, WI 74,532 Sq. Ft. 1.99 1.99 1.99 100 100 100
Hotel
- -----
Majestic Inn San Francisco, CA 60 Rooms 136.08 117.45 106.79 73 70 56
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE> 13
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Rent Per
Square Foot/
Units/ Average Room Rate Occupancy %
Square Footage/ ----------------------- ----------------------
Property Location Rooms/Acres 1997 1996 1995 1997 1996 1995
- ----------------- -------------- --------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
<S> <C> <C>
Land
- ----
Las Colinas Las Colinas, TX 4.7 Acres
West End Dallas, TX 8.844 Acres
</TABLE>
- --------------------
* Property was purchased in either 1996 or 1997.
Occupancy presented here and throughout this ITEM 2. is without reference to
whether leases in effect are at, below or above market rates.
In 1994, the Company borrowed a total of $3.3 million from a Northtown Mall
tenant, secured by the shopping center in Dallas, Texas. The mortgage matured
December 31, 1995. In August 1996, the Company modified and extended the
matured loan by making $450,000 in principal paydowns to extend the loan to
March 31, 1997. The Company did not payoff the loan at maturity. In October
1997, the Company made a $200,000 principal paydown to extend the loan to
December 31, 1997. In December 1997, the Company made an additional $100,000
principal paydown to extend the loan to March 31, 1998. The loan had a
principal balance of $2.5 million at December 31, 1997.
In January 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured by 74
New Montgomery, an office building in San Francisco, California, in the amount
of $6.3 million. The Company received net cash of $1.0 million after the
payoff of $5.2 million in existing mortgage debt, funding a tax escrow and the
payment of various closing costs associated with the financing. The new
mortgage bears interest at a variable rate, currently 9.25% per annum, requires
monthly payments of principal and interest of $53,996 and matures in January
2004. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee of
$63,000 to BCM based on the new $6.3 million mortgage.
Also in January 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured
by the Woods Edge Apartments in Rockville, Maryland in the amount of $6.2
million. The Company received no net cash. The refinancing proceeds were used
to payoff $5.9 million in existing mortgage debt, the funding of a tax escrow
and the payment of various closing costs associated with the financing. The
new mortgage bears interest at 8.125% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $46,035 and matures in February 2007. The Company
paid a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee of $62,000 to BCM based on
the new $6.2 million mortgage.
In February 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured by
the Spa Cove Apartments in Annapolis, Maryland in the amount of $12.2 million.
The Company received net cash of $245,000 after the payoff of $11.6 million in
existing mortgage debt, the funding of a tax escrow and the payment of various
closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears interest
at 8.015% per annum,
13
<PAGE> 14
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $89,529 and matures in
March 2007. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee
of $122,000 to BCM based on the new $12.2 million mortgage.
In March 1997, the Company purchased the Terrace Hills Apartments, a 310 unit
apartment complex in El Paso, Texas, for $6.2 million. The Company paid $1.4
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $4.8 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 8.07% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $35,086 and matures in April 2007. The Company paid
a real estate brokerage commission of $193,000 to Carmel Realty and a real
estate acquisition fee of $62,000 to BCM based on the $6.2 million purchase
price of the property.
Also in March 1997, the Company purchased the Crescent Place Apartments, a
120 unit apartment complex in Houston, Texas, for $2.3 million. The Company
paid $500,000 in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $1.8 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 8.5% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $13,552 and matures in April 2004. The Company paid
a real estate brokerage commission of $91,000 to Carmel Realty and a real
estate acquisition fee of $24,000 to BCM based on the $2.3 million purchase
price of the property.
Further in March 1997, the Company purchased the Savings of America Building, a
68,634 square foot office building in Houston, Texas, for $1.6 million in cash.
The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $64,000 to Carmel Realty
and a real estate acquisition fee of $16,000 to BCM based on the $1.6 million
purchase price of the property. In August 1997, the Company obtained mortgage
financing in the amount of $1.3 million secured by the previously unencumbered
Savings of America Building. The Company received net cash of $1.2 million
after funding a required tax escrow and the payment of various closing costs
associated with the financing. The mortgage bears interest at 8.49% per annum,
requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $10,371 and matures in
September 2007. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing
fee of $13,000 to BCM based on the new $1.3 million mortgage.
In March 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt scheduled to mature in
December 1997, secured by the President's Square Shopping Center in San
Antonio, Texas, in the amount of $1.9 million. The Company received net cash
of $600,000 after the payoff of $1.2 million in existing mortgage debt and the
payment of various closing costs associated with the financing. The new
mortgage bears interest at 9.44% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $16,521 and matures in March 2009. The Company paid
a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee of $19,000 to BCM based on the
new $1.9 million mortgage.
In May 1997, the Company purchased the Treehouse Apartments, a 160 unit
apartment complex in Irving, Texas, for $3.4 million in cash. The
14
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $122,000 to Carmel Realty
and a real estate acquisition fee of $34,000 to BCM based on the $3.4 million
purchase price of the property. In June 1997, the Company obtained mortgage
financing in the amount of $2.8 million secured by the previously unencumbered
Treehouse Apartments. The Company received net cash of $2.3 million after
funding required tax and repair escrows and the payment of various closing
costs associated with the financing. The mortgage bears interest at 8.28% per
annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $21,994 and
matures in July 2007. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage and equity
refinancing fee of $28,000 to BCM based on the $2.8 million mortgage.
Also in May 1997, the Company purchased the Villas at Countryside Apartments, a
102 unit apartment complex in Sterling, Virginia, for $6.3 million. The
Company paid $1.1 million in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $5.2
million. The mortgage bore interest at a variable rate, required monthly
payments of principal and interest of $38,768 and was scheduled to mature in
December 1997. The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $183,000
to Carmel Realty and a real estate acquisition fee of $63,000 to BCM based on
the $6.3 million purchase price of the property. In December 1997, the
mortgage was modified and extended. The mortgage now bears interest at 9.0%
per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $17,230 and
matures in June 1998.
In August 1997, the Company purchased a 8.844 acre parcel of undeveloped land
in downtown Dallas, Texas, for $11.0 million. The Company paid $2.2 million in
cash with the seller providing purchase money financing of the remaining $8.8
million of the purchase price. The financing bears interest at 8.5% per annum,
requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $67,664 and matures in
September 2002. The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of
$285,000 to Carmel Realty and a real estate acquisition fee of $110,000 to BCM
based on the $11.0 million purchase price of the property.
In September 1997, the Company purchased Bonita Plaza, a 47,777 square foot
office building in Bonita, California, for $5.7 million. The Company paid $1.7
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $4.0 million. The
mortgage bears interest at a variable rate, currently 10.5% per annum, requires
monthly payments of interest only and matures in September 1998. The Company
paid a real estate brokerage commission of $183,000 to Carmel Realty and a real
estate acquisition fee of $57,000 to BCM based on the $5.7 million purchase
price of the property.
Also in September 1997, the Company purchased the Country Bend Apartments, a
166 unit apartment complex in Fort Worth, Texas, for $3.4 million. The Company
paid $743,000 in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $2.6 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 8.82% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $21,913
15
<PAGE> 16
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
and matures in May 2005. The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission
of $121,000 to Carmel Realty and a real estate acquisition fee of $34,000 to
BCM based on the $3.4 million purchase price of the property.
Further in September 1997, the Company obtained mortgage financing in the
amount of $1.5 million secured by the previously unencumbered Carseka
Apartments in Los Angeles, California. The Company received net cash of $1.5
million after funding tax and insurance escrows and the payment of various
closing costs associated with the financing. The mortgage bears interest at
7.6% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $10,768
and matures in October 2007. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage and equity
refinancing fee of $15,000 to BCM based on the new $1.5 million mortgage.
In October 1997, the Company purchased the Sandstone Apartments, a 238 unit
apartment complex in Mesa, Arizona, for $7.9 million. The Company paid $2.0
million in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $5.9 million. The
mortgage bears interest at a variable rate, currently 8.25% per annum, requires
monthly payments of principal and interest of $45,087 for the first sixty
months and thereafter requires monthly payments of principal and interest of
$49,962 and matures in August 2004. The Company paid a real estate brokerage
commission of $228,000 to Carmel Realty and an acquisition fee of $79,000 to
BCM based on the $7.9 million purchase price of the property.
Also in October 1997, the Company purchased the Encon Warehouse, a 279,290
square foot industrial warehouse facility in Fort Worth, Texas, for $4.7
million. The Company paid $1.2 million in cash and obtained new mortgage
financing of $3.5 million. The mortgage bears interest at 8.5% per annum,
requires monthly payments of interest only for the first thirty-six months and
thereafter requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $26,912 and
matures in October 2007. The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission
of $161,000 to Carmel Realty and a real estate acquisition fee of $47,000 to
BCM based on the $4.7 million purchase price of the property.
Further in October 1997, the Company purchased the Sunchase Apartments, a 300
unit apartment complex in Odessa, Texas, for $3.6 million. The Company paid
$1.5 million in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $2.1 million. The
new mortgage bears interest at 9.0% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $17,621 and matures in June 2001. The Company paid a
real estate brokerage commission of $127,000 to Carmel Realty and an
acquisition fee of $36,000 to BCM based on the $3.6 million purchase price of
the property.
In October 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt secured by the South
Cochran Apartments in Los Angeles, California in the amount of $2.0 million.
The Company received net cash of $921,000 after the payoff of $902,000 in
existing mortgage debt, funding of tax and insurance escrows and the payment of
various closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears
interest at 7.62% per annum,
16
<PAGE> 17
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $13,795 and matures in
November 2007. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing
fee of $20,000 to BCM based on the new $2.0 million mortgage.
In December 1997, the Company purchased the Fairpark Apartments, a 49 unit
apartment complex in Los Angeles, California, for $2.0 million. The Company
paid $500,000 in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $1.5 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 8.45% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $11,628 and matures in January 2003. The Company
paid a real estate brokerage commission of $81,000 to Carmel Realty and a real
estate acquisition fee of $20,000 to BCM based on the $2.0 million purchase
price of the property.
Also in December 1997, the Company purchased the Villa Piedra Apartments, a 132
unit apartment complex in Los Angeles, California, for $4.7 million. The
Company paid $1.2 million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $3.5
million. The mortgage bears interest at 8.45% per annum, requires monthly
payments of principal and interest of $26,833 and matures in January 2003. The
Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $160,000 to Carmel Realty
and a real estate acquisition fee of $47,000 to BCM based on the $4.7 million
purchase price of the property.
Further in December 1997, the Company purchased the Timbers Apartments, a 180
unit apartment complex in Tyler, Texas, for $2.3 million. The Company paid
$500,000 in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $1.8 million. The
mortgage bears interest at a variable rate, currently 9.2% per annum, requires
monthly payments of principal and interest of $16,763 and matures in December
2017. The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $90,000 to Carmel
Realty and a real estate acquisition fee of $23,000 to BCM based on the $2.3
million purchase price of the property.
In December 1997, the Company purchased the Lexington Center, a 74,603 square
foot office building in Colorado Springs, Colorado, for $5.3 million. The
Company paid $1.3 million in cash with the seller providing purchase money
financing of the remaining $4.0 million of the purchase price. The financing
bears interest at 9% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and
interest of $30,000 and matures in December 1998. The Company paid a real
estate brokerage commission of $176,000 to Carmel Realty and a real estate
acquisition fee of $53,000 to BCM based on the $5.3 million purchase price of
the property.
Also in December 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured
by Majestic Inn in San Francisco, California in the amount of $5.7 million.
The Company received net cash of $4.5 million after the payoff of $950,000 in
existing mortgage debt, the funding of escrows and the payment of various
closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears interest
at 8.31% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of
$46,376 and matures in January 2005. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage
equity and refinancing fee of $57,000 to BCM based on the new $5.7 million
mortgage.
17
<PAGE> 18
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
Further in December 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt secured by
Corporate Center at Beaumeade, an industrial warehouse in Ashburn, Virginia in
the amount of $7.0 million. The Company received net cash of $2.1 million after
the payoff of $4.6 million in existing mortgage debt, the funding of escrows and
the payment of various closing costs associated with the financing. The new
mortgage bears interest at 7.4% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $51,275 and matures in January 2008. The Company paid
a mortgage brokerage equity and refinancing fee of $70,000 to BCM based on the
new $7.0 million mortgage.
In December 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt secured by Corporate
Point Office Building in Chantilly, Virginia in the amount of $4.0 million.
The Company received net cash of $944,000 after the payoff of $2.8 million in
existing mortgage debt, the funding of escrows and the payment of various
closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears interest
at 7.75% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of
$30,364 and matures in January 2008. The Company paid a mortgage brokerage and
equity refinancing fee of $40,000 to BCM based on the new $4.0 million
mortgage.
In January 1998, the Company purchased the Mountain Plaza Apartments, a 188 unit
apartment complex in El Paso, Texas, for $4.0 million. The Company paid $1.0
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $3.0 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 8.2% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest
only and matures in January 2000. The Company paid a real estate brokerage
commission of $139,000 to Carmel Realty and a real estate acquisition fee of
$39,000 to BCM based on the $4.0 million purchase price of the property.
Also in January 1998, the Company purchased the Junction Apartments, a 212 unit
apartment complex in Midland, Texas, for $2.5 million. The Company paid
$600,000 in cash with the seller providing purchase money financing of the
remaining $1.9 million of the purchase price. The financing bears interest at
a variable rate, currently 8.0% per annum, requires monthly payments of
interest only for the first twenty-four months and thereafter requires monthly
payments of principal and interest of $14,302 and matures in January 2003. The
Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $94,000 to Carmel Realty and
a real estate acquisition fee of $25,000 to BCM based on the $2.5 million
purchase price of the property.
Further in January 1998, the Company purchased the Laws Street land, a 1.41
acre parcel of land in Dallas, Texas, for $1.9 million in cash. The Company
paid a real estate brokerage commission of $39,000 to Carmel Realty and a real
estate acquisition fee of $19,000 to BCM based on the $1.9 million purchase
price of the property.
In January 1998, the Company purchased the Bent Tree Apartments, a 204 unit
apartment complex in Addison, Texas, for $8.1 million. The Company paid $1.7
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $6.4 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 7.2% per annum, requires
18
<PAGE> 19
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
monthly payments of principal and interest of $46,054 and matures in February
2008. The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $232,000 to
Carmel Realty and a real estate acquisition fee of $81,000 to BCM based on the
$8.1 million purchase price of the property.
In February 1998, the Company purchased Parkway North, a 71,041 square foot
office building in Dallas, Texas, for $5.4 million. The Company paid $1.5
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $3.9 million. The
mortgage bears interest at a variable rate, currently 8.75% per annum, requires
monthly payments of interest only and matures in March 2000. The Company paid a
real estate brokerage commission of $179,000 to Carmel Realty and a real estate
acquisition fee of $54,000 to BCM based on the $5.4 million purchase price of
the property.
Also in February 1998, the Company purchased the Lemmon Carlisle land, a 2.14
acre parcel of land in Dallas, Texas, for $3.4 million in cash. The Company
paid a real estate brokerage commission of $54,000 to Carmel Realty and a real
estate acquisition fee of $34,000 to BCM based on the $3.4 million purchase
price of the property.
Properties Held for Sale. Set forth below are the Company's properties held
for sale, primarily obtained through foreclosure, and the average rental rate
for a commercial property and occupancy thereof at December 31, 1997, 1996 and
1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Rent Per
Square Foot Occupancy %
Square Footage/ ---------------------- -----------------------
Property Location Acres 1997 1996 1995 1997 1996 1995
- ----------------- -------------- --------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Shopping Center
- ---------------
Shaws Plaza Sharon, MA 103,482 Sq. Ft. $ 5.47 $ 5.67 $ 5.79 87 87 87
Land
- ----
Moss Creek Greensboro, NC 80 Acres
Moss Creek Greensboro, NC 4.79 Acres
Fruitland Fruitland
Park, FL 4.66 Acres
Republic land Dallas, TX .9250 Acres
</TABLE>
In February 1997, the Company completed the sale of the Fiesta Mart, a 29,000
square foot shopping center in San Angelo, Texas, which was under contract for
sale at December 31, 1996, for $544,000 in cash. The Company received net cash
of $403,000 after the payoff of $90,000 in existing mortgage debt and the
payment of various closing costs associated with the sale. The Company paid a
real estate brokerage commission of $22,000 to Carmel Realty, based on the
$544,000 sales price of the property. The Company recognized no gain or loss
on the sale.
Also in February 1997, the Company completed the sale of a .9976 acre parcel of
land in Dallas, Texas, which was under contract for sale at December 31, 1996,
for $2.7 million in cash. The Company received net cash of $2.6 million after
the payment of various closing costs associated with the sale. The Company
paid a real estate brokerage
19
<PAGE> 20
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
commission of $103,000 to Carmel Realty based on the $2.7 million sales price
of the property. The Company recognized a gain of $1.4 million on the sale.
In April 1997, the Company sold a foreclosed single family residence in
Scottsdale, Arizona, for $778,000 in cash. The Company paid a real estate
brokerage commission of $31,000 to Carmel Realty based on the $778,000 sales
price of the property. The Company recognized a gain of $55,000 on the sale.
In November 1997, the Company sold President's Square, a 46,509 square foot
shopping center in San Antonio, Texas, for $2.6 million in cash. The Company
received net cash of $470,000 after the payoff of $1.9 million in existing
mortgage debt and the payment of various closing costs associated with the
sale. The Company paid a real estate brokerage commission of $85,000 to Carmel
Realty based on the $2.6 million sales price of the property. The Company
recognized a gain of $554,000 on the sale.
In December 1997, the Company sold Republic Towers, a three building, 1,324,624
square foot office facility in Dallas, Texas, for $24.0 million in cash. The
Company received net cash of $23.5 million after the payment of various closing
costs associated with the sale. The Company paid a real estate brokerage
commission of $480,000 to Carmel Realty based on the $24.0 million sales price
of the property. The Company recognized a gain of $19.4 million on the sale.
Partnership Properties. Set forth below are the properties owned by
partnerships which the Company accounts for using the equity method and the
monthly rental rate for apartments and the average annual rental rate for
commercial properties and occupancy thereof at December 31, 1997, 1996 and
1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Rent Per
Square Foot Occupancy %
Units/ ---------------------- ------------------------
Property Location Square Footage 1997 1996 1995 1997 1996 1995
- ----------------- -------------- --------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Apartments
- ----------
Inwood Green Houston, TX 126 Units/
105,960 Sq. Ft. $ .46 $ .45 $ .44 94 93 93
Lincoln Court Dallas, TX 55 Units/
40,063 Sq. Ft. 1.04 .99 .96 99 98 94
Oaks of Inwood Houston, TX 198 Units/
167,872 Sq. Ft. .45 .44 .43 94 93 91
Office Building
- ---------------
MacArthur Mills Carrollton, TX 53,472 Sq. Ft. 9.35 8.38 7.80 97 94 95
Shopping Centers
- ----------------
Chelsea Square Houston, TX 70,275 Sq. Ft. 9.21 9.32 9.14 49 69 77
Summit at
Bridgewood Fort Worth, TX 48,696 Sq. Ft. 9.48 8.67 9.23 65 62 63
</TABLE>
The Company owns a combined 55% limited and general partnership interest in
Jor-Trans Investors Limited Partnership ("Jor-Trans") which owns the Lincoln
Court Apartments.
20
<PAGE> 21
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Real Estate (Continued)
The Company owns a combined 63.7% limited and general partner interest and IORI
owns a 36.3% general partner interest in Tri-City Limited Partnership
("Tri-City") which owns the five other properties in the table above. In
September 1997, Tri-City obtained first mortgage financing of $1.9 million
secured by the previously unencumbered Oaks of Inwood and Inwood Green
Apartments. The mortgage bears interest at 7.905% per annum, requires monthly
payments of principal and interest of $14,415 and matures in September 2007.
The Company received $1.1 million of the net financing proceeds. In
conjunction with the financing, Tri-City paid a mortgage brokerage and equity
refinancing fee of $19,000 to BCM, based on the $1.9 million financing. In
1997, the Company made $421,000 in advances to the partnership and received
$420,000 in operating distributions and $1.1 million in financing distributions
from the partnership. See ITEM 13. "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS - Related Party Transactions."
Mortgage Loans
In addition to investments in real estate, a portion of the Company's assets
are invested in mortgage notes receivable, principally secured by
income-producing real estate. The Company expects that the percentage of its
assets invested in mortgage loans will increase, as it has determined that in
1998 it will seek to fund or acquire mortgage loans. It may also originate
mortgage loans in conjunction with providing purchase money financing of a
property sale. The Company intends to service and hold for investment the
mortgage notes in its portfolio. The Company's mortgage notes receivable
consist of first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans.
Types of Mortgage Activity. The Company may originate its own mortgage loans,
as well as acquire existing mortgage notes either directly from builders,
developers or property owners, or through mortgage banking firms, commercial
banks or other qualified brokers. BCM, in its capacity as a mortgage servicer,
services the Company's mortgage notes. The Company's investment policy is
described in ITEM 1. "BUSINESS - Business Plan and Investment Policy."
Types of Properties Securing Mortgage Notes. The properties securing the
Company's mortgage notes receivable portfolio at December 31, 1997, consisted
of a shopping center, an apartment complex, a hotel, 36.3 acres of commercial
land, 7 developed residential lots and a 34,847 square foot parcel of
unimproved land. The Company's Board of Directors may alter the types of
properties securing or collateralizing mortgage loans in which the Company
invests without a vote of stockholders. The Company's Articles of
Incorporation impose certain restrictions on transactions with related parties,
as discussed in ITEM 13. "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS."
At December 31, 1997, the Company's mortgage notes receivable portfolio
included 5 mortgage loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of $4.1 million
secured by income-producing real estate located in the Southeast
21
<PAGE> 22
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Mortgage Loans (Continued)
and Southwest regions of the continental United States and 15 loans with an
aggregate outstanding balance of $700,000 which are secured by collateral other
than income-producing real estate. At December 31, 1997, 1% of the Company's
assets were invested in notes and interest receivable (less than 1% in
wraparound mortgage notes, junior and other mortgage notes).
The following table sets forth the percentages (based on the outstanding
mortgage note balance) by property type and geographic region, of the
properties (other than a hotel and unimproved land) that serve as collateral
for the Company's outstanding mortgage notes receivable at December 31, 1997.
See Schedule IV to the Consolidated Financial Statements included at ITEM 8.
"FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA" for further details of the
Company's mortgage notes receivable portfolio.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Commercial
Region Apartments Properties Total
--------- ---------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Southwest.................... 35% -- 35%
Southeast.................... -- 65 65
---- ---- ----
35% 65% 100%
</TABLE>
A summary of the activity in the Company's mortgage notes receivable portfolio
during 1997 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Loans in mortgage notes receivable portfolio at
January 1, 1997........................................... 24
Loans paid off.............................................. (4)
-------
Loans in mortgage notes receivable portfolio at
December 31, 1997.......................................... 20
========
</TABLE>
During 1997, $4.9 million was collected in settlement of four mortgage notes
receivable and $82,000 in mortgage principal payments were received.
At December 31, 1997, less than 1% of the Company's assets were invested in
mortgage notes secured by non-income-producing real estate, comprised of a
first mortgage note secured by 36.3 acres of commercial land in Maumelle,
Arkansas, a first mortgage note secured by 34,847 square feet of unimproved
land in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and seven first mortgage notes secured by
developed residential lots in Greensboro, North Carolina.
First Mortgage Loans. The Company invests in first mortgage notes, with short,
medium or long-term maturities. First mortgage loans generally provide for
level periodic payments of principal and interest sufficient to substantially
repay the loan prior to maturity, but may involve interest-only payments or
moderate amortization of principal and a "balloon" principal payment at
maturity. With respect to first mortgage loans, the Company's general policy
is to require that the borrower provide a mortgagee's title policy or an
acceptable legal title opinion as to the validity and the priority of the
mortgage lien over all other
22
<PAGE> 23
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Mortgage Loans (Continued)
obligations, except liens arising from unpaid property taxes and other
exceptions normally allowed by first mortgage lenders in the relevant area.
The Company may grant to other lenders, participations in first mortgage loans
originated by the Company.
The following discussion briefly describes the events that affected previously
funded first mortgage loans during 1997.
In February 1994, the Company provided $6.7 million of purchase money financing
in conjunction with the sale of 1,406 acres of land in sixteen developed
residential and commercial subdivisions located in Maumelle, Arkansas, secured
by a first mortgage on the properties sold. The borrower did not make the
scheduled February 1995 principal and interest payments. In September 1995, the
Company reached a settlement with the borrower that provided the following: (i)
the payment by the borrower of $2.5 million in cash; (ii) the Company's release
of all land securing the note; (iii) the Company's acceptance of a new $1.4
million note secured by 36.3 acres of commercial land, such note bore interest
at 9.0% and matured in January 1996 and (iv) the Company's receipt of 700,000
shares of the borrower's capital stock, which the borrower had the option to
repurchase at $5.00 per share for two years from closing. The original sale had
been recorded under the cost recovery method with gain being deferred until the
note was collected. With the Company's receipt of $2.5 million in cash on
September 12, 1995, it recognized $1.6 million of the gain previously deferred.
The $1.4 million note was not paid at maturity. The Company has reached a
settlement with the borrower in an effort to correct the default. Per the
settlement agreement, the borrower is to pay $17,500 per month in non-refundable
fees, for five consecutive months, effective November 1997. In return the
Company has agreed to delay pursuing its remedies under the note until April
1998. The Company has collected all five payments. If the borrower should not
pay off the note in April 1998, the Company does not expect to incur a loss on
the note as the fair value of the collateral property exceeds the nominal
carrying value of the note.
In May and September 1997, the Company accepted discounted payoffs of $2.1
million and $2.8 million in settlement of two first mortgage notes receivable
with principal balances of $2.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The
Company recorded no loss on the note settlements in excess of the reserves
previously established.
Wraparound Mortgage Loans. A wraparound mortgage loan, sometimes called an
all-inclusive loan, is a mortgage loan having an original principal balance
equal to the outstanding balance under the prior existing mortgage loan(s) plus
the amount actually advanced under the wraparound mortgage loan. Wraparound
mortgage loans may provide for full, partial or no amortization of principal.
The Company's policy is to make wraparound mortgage loans in amounts and on
properties as to which it would otherwise make first mortgage loans.
The Company did not originate or acquire any wraparound mortgage loans in 1997.
23
<PAGE> 24
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (Continued)
Mortgage Loans (Continued)
Junior Mortgage Loans. The Company may invest in junior mortgage loans. Such
loans are secured by mortgages that are subordinate to one or more prior liens
either on the fee or a leasehold interest in real estate. Recourse on such
loans ordinarily includes the real estate on which the loan is made, other
collateral and personal guarantees by the borrower. The Company's Board of
Directors restricts investment in junior mortgage loans, excluding wraparound
mortgage loans, to not more than 10% of the Company's assets. At December 31,
1997, less than 1% of the Company's assets were invested in junior mortgage
loans.
The Company did not originate or acquire any junior mortgage loans in 1997.
Loans Secured by Collateral Other than Real Estate. In June 1992, the Company
received ten notes receivable secured by collateral other than real estate in
satisfaction of a $622,000 obligation to the Company. At December 31, 1997,
five of the notes with a combined principal balance of $374,000 remained
outstanding. The Company's investment policy precludes the origination of
loans secured by collateral other than real estate.
Partnership mortgage loans. The Company owns a 60% general partner interest
and IORI owns a 40% general partner interest in Nakash Income Associates
("NIA"). NIA in turn owns a wraparound mortgage note receivable, secured by a
shopping center in Maulden, Missouri. In August 1997, Mountain Home Associates
("MHA"), the owner of the shopping center, refinanced the matured mortgage debt
in the amount of $850,000. The Company contributed $271,000 to the partnership
to payoff the existing $1.0 million mortgage. The new mortgage bears interest
at a variable rate, currently 9.5% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $13,000 and matures in May 2005.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Olive Litigation
In February 1990, the Company, together with CMET, IORI and National Income
Realty Trust, three real estate entities with, at the time, the same officers,
directors or trustees and advisor as the Company, entered into a settlement of
a class and derivative action entitled Olive et al. v. National Income Realty
Trust et al., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California relating to the operation and management of each of such entities.
On April 23, 1990, the Court granted final approval of the terms of the
settlement.
On May 4, 1994, the parties entered into a Modification of Stipulation of
Settlement dated April 27, 1994 (the "Olive Modification") that settled
subsequent claims of breaches of the settlement that were asserted by the
plaintiffs and modified certain provisions of the April 1990 settlement. The
Olive Modification was preliminarily approved by
24
<PAGE> 25
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)
Olive Litigation (Continued)
the Court on July 1, 1994 and final Court approval was entered on December 12,
1994. The effective date of the Olive Modification was January 11, 1995.
The Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the Olive Modification, and during
August and September 1996, the Court held evidentiary hearings to assess
compliance with the terms of the Olive Modification by the various parties.
The Court issued no ruling or order with respect to the matters addressed at
the hearings.
Separately, in 1996, legal counsel for the plaintiffs notified the Company's
Board of Directors that he intended to assert that certain actions taken by the
Board of Directors breached the terms of the Olive Modification. On January
27, 1997, the parties entered into an Amendment to the Olive Modification
effective January 9, 1997 (the "Olive Amendment"), which was submitted to the
Court for approval on January 29, 1997. The Olive Amendment provides for the
settlement of all matters raised at the evidentiary hearings and by plaintiffs'
counsel in his notices to the Company's Board of Directors. On May 2, 1997, a
hearing was held for the Court to consider approval of the Olive Amendment. As
a result of the hearing, the parties entered into a revised Olive Amendment.
The Court issued an order approving the Olive Amendment on July 3, 1997.
The Olive Amendment provides for the addition of four new unaffiliated members
to the Company's Board of Directors and sets forth new requirements for the
approval of any transactions with certain affiliates until April 28, 1999. In
addition, the Company, CMET, IORI and their stockholders released the
defendants from any claims relating to the plaintiffs' allegations and matters
which were the subject of the evidentiary hearings. The plaintiffs'
allegations of any breaches of the Olive Modification shall be settled by
mutual agreement of the parties or, lacking such agreement, by an arbitration
proceeding.
Under the Olive Amendment, all shares of the Company owned by Gene E. Phillips
or any of his affiliates shall be voted at all stockholder meetings of the
Company held until April 28, 1999 in favor of all new members of the Company's
Board of Directors added under the Olive Amendment. The Olive Amendment also
requires that, until April 28, 1999, all shares of the Company owned by Mr.
Phillips or his affiliates in excess of forty percent (40%) of the Company's
outstanding shares shall be voted in proportion to the votes cast by all
non-affiliated stockholders of the Company.
In accordance with the Olive Amendment, Richard W. Douglas, Larry E. Harley and
R. Douglas Leonhard were added to the Company's Board of Directors in January
1998 and Murray Shaw was added to the Company's Board of Directors in February
1998.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
25
<PAGE> 26
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Company's Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")
using the symbol "TCI". The following table sets forth the high and low sales
prices as reported in the consolidated reporting system of the NYSE.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTER ENDED HIGH LOW
- ------------------ -------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
March 31, 1998................................. $ 18 $ 14 1/4
(through March 6, 1998)
March 31, 1997................................. 14 7/8 10 3/4
June 30, 1997.................................. 15 5/8 10 3/4
September 30, 1997............................. 21 1/4 14 1/2
December 31, 1997.............................. 21 3/8 13 3/8
March 31, 1996................................. 11 1/2 9 5/8
June 30, 1996.................................. 10 1/2 9 1/4
September 30, 1996............................. 10 1/2 9 3/4
December 31, 1996.............................. 11 1/8 9 7/8
</TABLE>
As of March 6, 1998, the closing price of the Company's Common Stock as
reported in the consolidated reporting system of the NYSE was $15.75 per share.
As of March 6, 1998, the Company's Common Stock was held by 5,529 holders of
record.
The Company paid dividends in 1997 and in 1996 as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount
Date Declared Record Date Payable Date Per Share
- ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
February 26, 1997 March 14, 1997 March 31, 1997 $ .07
June 5, 1997 June 13, 1997 June 30, 1997 .07
September 3, 1997 September 15, 1997 September 30, 1997 .07
December 1, 1997 December 15, 1997 December 31, 1997 .07
March 1, 1996 March 15, 1996 March 31, 1996 $ .07
June 3, 1996 June 14, 1996 June 28, 1996 .07
August 23, 1996 September 13, 1996 September 30, 1996 .07
December 2, 1996 December 13, 1996 December 31, 1996 .07
</TABLE>
The Company reported to the Internal Revenue Service that 100% of the dividends
paid in 1997 represented capital gains and 100% of the dividends paid in 1996
represented a return of capital.
On December 24, 1997, the Company announced it would pay a special dividend of
$1.00 per share, payable January 8, 1998 to stockholders of record on January
2, 1998. This special dividend resulted from the sale of the Republic Towers
Office Building in Dallas, Texas in December 1997.
26
<PAGE> 27
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS (Continued)
On December 5, 1989, the Company's Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase program. The Company's Board of Directors authorized the Company to
repurchase a total of 687,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock pursuant to
such program. Through December 31, 1997, the Company had repurchased 387,815
shares of its Common Stock pursuant to such program at a cost to the Company of
$3.0 million. In 1997, the Company repurchased 37,227 shares at a cost of
$445,000.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
EARNINGS DATA (dollars in thousands, except per share)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues .................... $ 55,961 $ 46,878 $ 48,272 $ 37,983 $ 32,242
Expenses .................... 65,578 56,499 58,174 47,154 42,168
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(Loss) from operations ...... (9,617) (9,621) (9,902) (9,171) (9,926)
Equity in income (loss)
of investees ............... 812 (20) (1,083) (90) (262)
Gain on sale of partner-
ship interests ............. -- -- -- 2,514 --
Gain on sale of
real estate ................ 21,404 1,579 5,822 2,153 24
Extraordinary gain .......... -- 256 1,437 1,189 1,594
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) ........... $ 12,599 $ (7,806) $ (3,726) $ (3,405) $ (8,570)
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
PER SHARE DATA
Income (loss) before
extraordinary gain ......... $ 3.22 $ (2.02) $ (1.29) $ (1.15) $ (2.52)
Extraordinary gain .......... -- .06 .36 .30 .40
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) ........... $ 3.22 $ (1.96) $ (.93) $ (.85) $ (2.12)
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Dividends per share ......... $ .28 $ .28 $ .07 $ -- $ --
Weighted average Common
shares outstanding ......... 3,907,221 3,994,687 4,012,275 4,012,275 4,033,332
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
BALANCE SHEET DATA (dollars in thousands, except per share)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Notes and interest
receivable, net ............ $ 3,947 $ 8,606 $ 10,017 $ 11,201 $ 12,447
Real estate held for
sale, net
Foreclosed ................. 1,356 910 2,460 8,032 11,277
Other ...................... 3,630 2,089 3,415 341 596
Real estate held for
investment, net ............ 270,245 217,410 220,249 213,445 178,857
Total assets ................ 319,535 245,371 260,180 247,964 221,095
Notes and interest
payable .................... 222,029 158,692 159,889 145,514 116,024
Stockholders' equity ........ 86,533 79,359 89,184 93,177 96,582
Book value per share ........ $ 22.25 $ 19.87 $ 22.23 $ 23.22 $ 23.95
</TABLE>
27
<PAGE> 28
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Continued)
The Company purchased fifteen properties in 1997 for a total of $69.9 million
and six properties in 1996 for a total of $7.2 million. The Company sold five
properties in 1997 for a total of $30.6 million and five properties in 1996 for
a total of $9.6 million.
Shares and per share data have been restated for the three for two forward
Common Stock split effected February 15, 1996.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (the "Company") invests in real estate
through acquisitions, leases and partnerships and in mortgage loans on real
estate, including first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans. The Company is
the successor to a California business trust organized on September 6, 1983
which commenced operations on January 31, 1984.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 1997 aggregated $24.7 million
compared with $1.0 million at December 31, 1996. The principal reasons for
this increase in cash are discussed in the paragraphs below.
The Company's principal sources of cash have been and will continue to be from
property operations, proceeds from property sales, the collection of mortgage
notes receivable, borrowings and to a lesser extent, distributions from
partnerships. The Company expects that its cash balance at December 31, 1997,
and cash that will be generated in 1998 from the collection of mortgage notes
receivable, sales of properties, borrowings against certain of the Company's
unencumbered properties and refinancing or extension of certain of its mortgage
debt will be sufficient to meet all of the Company's cash requirements,
including debt service obligations coming due in 1998, dividend payments and
property maintenance and improvements, as more fully discussed in the
paragraphs below.
The Company's cash flow from property operations (rents collected less payments
for property operating expenses) increased from $12.7 million in 1996 to $16.2
million in 1997. This increase is primarily the result of the Company having
acquired 5 income producing properties in 1996 and 15 income producing
properties in 1997. Also contributing to the increase was increased occupancy
and rents, at the Company's apartments and commercial properties, and the
Company's control of operating expenses. These increases are partially offset
by decreases due to the sale of three income producing properties in 1996 and
1997, respectively. The Company's management believes that this trend will
continue as a result of increased rental rates at both the Company's apartments
and commercial properties and increased occupancy at its commercial properties.
28
<PAGE> 29
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)
The Company owns a combined 63.7% limited and general partner interest in
Tri-City Limited Partnership which owns five properties in Texas. In 1997, the
Company received net distributions of $420,000 from the partnership's operating
cash flow and $1.1 million form its financing cash flow. In 1997, the Company
also received $79,000 in distributions from and made $32,000 in contributions
to Nakash Income Associates ("NIA") including $271,000 which was contributed to
the partnership to refinance matured mortgage debt. See NOTE 5.
"INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD REAL ESTATE ENTITIES."
In 1997, the Company received cash of $5.0 million from the payoff or collection
of four mortgage notes receivable. The Company also received a total of $73.8
million from new mortgage financings and refinancings and an additional $29.1
million net of debt payoffs from property sales during 1997. In 1997, the
Company expended $46.4 million in cash on property acquisitions and made a total
of $37.1 million in principal payoffs or paydowns on its mortgage debt.
Scheduled principal payments on notes payable of $25.1 million are due in 1998.
It is the Company's intention to either pay the mortgages that mature in 1998
when due, or seek to extend the due dates one or more years, or refinance the
debt on a long-term basis. The Company's management believes it will continue
to be successful in obtaining loan extensions or refinancings.
As discussed in NOTE 3. "REAL ESTATE AND DEPRECIATION," also during 1997 the
Company funded $5.3 million for operating cash flow deficits of the Republic
Towers Office Building in Dallas, Texas due to minimal occupancy and operating
expenses far exceeding rents. In January 1997, the Company received a final
insurance settlement totaling $9.6 million from 1995 hail storm and flood damage
to the Republic Towers Office Building. The property was sold in December 1997.
In October 1996, the Company received a $1.5 million settlement from one of the
defendants in a lawsuit brought by the Company against the former owners of an
office building in New Jersey and their agents. The Company had made a loan
secured by the building in 1987 and filed a foreclosure action which was
subsequently amended in 1990, to include claims of negligent misrepresentation
against the borrowers, their legal counsel, architect and engineers.
During the first quarter of 1998, the Company has continued to be an active
buyer. The Company purchased three apartment complexes, two parcels of
undeveloped land and one office building, for a total of $25.2 million, the
Company paying $10.1 million in cash, with the remainder of the purchase prices
financed through mortgage debt. The Company derived the cash portions of these
acquisitions from its cash on hand at December 31, 1997. See NOTE 17.
"SUBSEQUENT EVENTS."
Pursuant to a repurchase program originally announced by the Company on
December 5, 1989, the Company's Board of Directors has authorized the
29
<PAGE> 30
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)
repurchase of a total of 687,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock. As of
March 6, 1998, the Company had purchased 387,815 shares of its Common Stock at
a total cost to the Company of $3.0 million. In 1997, the Company repurchased
37,227 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost to the Company of $445,000.
None of such shares were repurchased in 1998.
During 1997, the Company declared and paid dividends of $1.1 million or $.28
per share.
The Company's management reviews the carrying values of the Company's
properties and mortgage notes receivable at least annually and whenever events
or a change in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. Impairment is
considered to exist if, in the case of a property, the future cash flow from
the property (undiscounted and without interest) is less than the carrying
amount of the property. For notes receivable impairment is considered to exist
if it is probable that all amounts due under the terms of the note will not be
collected. In those instances where impairment is found to exist, a provision
for loss is recorded by a charge against earnings. The Company's mortgage note
receivable review includes an evaluation of the collateral property securing
such note. The property review generally includes selective property
inspections, a review of the property's current rents compared to market rents,
a review of the property's expenses, a review of maintenance requirements, a
review of the property's cash flow, discussions with the manager of the
property and a review of properties in the surrounding area.
Results of Operations
1997 COMPARED TO 1996. The Company's net income for 1997 was $12.6 million
compared to a net loss of $7.8 million in 1996. The Company's 1997 net income
includes gains on sale of real estate of $21.4 million. The Company's 1996 net
loss includes gains on sale of real estate of $1.6 million and extraordinary
gains of $256,000. Fluctuations in the components of the Company's revenues
and expenses between the 1997 and 1996 are described below.
Rents increased $9.1 million in 1997 to $54.5 million compared to $45.4 million
in 1996. An increase of $6.9 million in rents is due to property acquisitions
in 1996 and 1997; and $3.1 million is due to increases in occupancy and rental
rates at the Company's residential and commercial properties primarily: Plaza
Tower Office Building, a 1% increase; Waterstreet Office Building, a 2%
increase; Institute Place Office Building, a 10% increase; 74 New Montgomery
Office Building, a 2% increase; Corporate Center at Beaumeade Office Building, a
2% increase; and Majestic Inn, a 3% increase. These increases are partially
offset by a decrease of $865,000 due to properties sold in 1996 and 1997.
Property operating expenses increased $3.9 million in 1997 to $32.4 million as
compared to $28.5 million in 1996. Of this increase, $4.3
30
<PAGE> 31
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Results of Operations (Continued)
million is due to properties acquired in 1996 and 1997. This increase is
partially offset by a decrease of $504,000 due to properties sold in 1996 and
1997.
Rents and property operations expenses both are expected to increase in 1998
due to anticipated increases in rents at the Company's apartments and
increased occupancy of its commercial properties as a result of a full year of
operations of the properties acquired during 1997 and in the first quarter of
1998.
Interest income for 1997 of $1.5 million approximated that of 1996, and is
expected to remain constant in 1998.
Interest expense increased to $16.8 million in 1997 as compared to $15.0 million
in 1996. Of this increase $1.6 million is attributable to properties acquired
in 1997 and $316,000 is attributable to property financings and refinancings
during 1997. These increases are partially offset by decreases of $73,000 due
to properties sold and mortgages paid off and $71,000 due to a decrease in
interest rates on variable interest rate debt. Interest expense is expected to
increase in 1998 due to anticipated property refinancings and the properties
acquired in the first quarter of 1998.
Depreciation expense increased to $9.6 million in 1997 as compared to $8.5
million in 1996. An increase of $752,000 is attributable to property
acquisitions and an increase of $515,000 is due to increased depreciation from
property additions and tenant improvements. These increases were partially,
offset by decreases of $63,000 due to properties sold and $88,000 due to assets
becoming fully depreciated. Depreciation expense is expected to increase in
1998 due to a full year of depreciation of properties acquired in 1997 and the
properties acquired in the first quarter of 1998.
Advisory fee expense of $1.8 million in 1997 approximated that of 1996. Such
fee is expected to increase as the Company's asset base increases. See NOTE 9.
"ADVISORY AGREEMENT."
General and administrative expenses decreased from $2.7 million in 1996 to $2.6
million in 1997. The decrease is due to a decrease in legal fees related to the
Olive and other litigation (see NOTE 15. "COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES")
partially offset by an increase in advisory cost reimbursements and other
professional fees.
As described in "Liquidity and Capital Resources" above, in 1997 the Company
received an insurance settlement of $9.6 million. In 1996, the Company received
a litigation settlement of $1.5 million.
In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company recognized a provision for loss of
$1.3 million to reduce the carrying value of a shopping center to its agreed
sales price less estimated costs of sale. Sale of the property is anticipated
in March 1998. In the second quarter of 1996,
31
<PAGE> 32
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Results of Operations (Continued)
the Company recognized a provision for loss of $1.6 million to reduce the
carrying value of an office building to its agreed sales price less estimated
costs of sale. Sale of the property was completed in July 1996.
Equity in income of investees was $812,000 in 1997 compared to a loss of
$20,000 in 1996. Included in equity earnings of investees in 1997 are gains on
the sale of real estate of $890,000 which is the Company's share of the gain
recognized by Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. ("IORI") on the sale of
three of its apartment complexes. The Company expects its share of equity
investees' income or losses to be insignificant in 1998.
In 1996, the Company recognized extraordinary gains totaling $256,000 on the
modification of the mortgage debt secured by the Dunes Plaza Shopping Center.
No such gain was recognized in 1997. See NOTE 14. "EXTRAORDINARY GAIN."
In 1997, the Company recognized gains totaling $21.4 million, $1.4 million from
the sale of a .9976 acre parcel of land and $19.4 million from the sale of an
office building, both located in Dallas, Texas, $55,000 from the sale of a
foreclosed single family residence in Scottsdale, Arizona and $554,000 from the
sale of a shopping center in San Antonio, Texas. See NOTE 3. "REAL ESTATE AND
DEPRECIATION."
In 1996, the Company recognized gains of $218,000, $1.4 million and $56,000
from the sales of Cheyenne Mountain land, Park Forest Apartments and Moss Creek
land. In September 1996, the Company recognized a loss of $63,000 from the
sale of Byron land. See NOTE 3. "REAL ESTATE AND DEPRECIATION."
1996 COMPARED TO 1995. The Company's net loss for 1996 was $7.8 million
compared to a net loss of $3.7 million in 1995. The Company's 1996 net loss
includes gains on sale of real estate of $1.6 million and extraordinary gains
of $256,000. The Company's 1995 net loss includes gains on sale of real estate
of $5.8 million and extraordinary gains of $1.4 million. Fluctuations in the
components of the Company's revenues and expenses between the 1996 and 1995 are
described below.
Rents decreased $1.4 million in 1996 to $45.4 million compared to $46.8 million
in 1995. A decrease of $5.3 million in rents is due to properties sold in 1995
and 1996. Offsetting this decrease in rents is an increase of $538,000 due to
the acquisition of the remaining partnership interest in three partnerships in
1995; $926,000 is due to property acquisitions in late 1995 and 1996; and $2.4
million is due to increases in occupancy at several of the Company's commercial
properties primarily: Corporate Center at Beaumeade Industrial Warehouse, a
29% increase; Park Long Industrial Warehouse, a 9% increase; Plaza Towers
Office Building, a 6% increase; and 74 New Montgomery Office Building, a 3%
increase.
32
<PAGE> 33
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Results of Operations (Continued)
Property operating expenses decreased $1.7 million in 1996 to $28.5 million as
compared to $30.2 million in 1995. Of this decrease, $3.1 million is due to
properties sold. This decrease is partially offset by increases of $935,000
due to property acquisitions and $544,000 due to the acquisition of the
remaining partnership interest in three partnerships in 1995.
Interest income for 1996 of $1.5 million approximated the $1.5 million in 1995.
Interest expense decreased to $15.0 million in 1996 as compared to $16.1
million in 1995. Of this decrease, $1.7 million due to properties sold and
mortgages paid off. This decrease is partially offset by increases of $180,000
attributable to the acquisition of the remaining partnership interests in three
partnerships during 1995, $107,000 attributable to properties acquired in 1996,
$488,000 attributable to property financings and refinancings during 1996, and
$107,000 attributable to increases in the interest rates on variable rate
mortgage debt.
Depreciation expense decreased to $8.5 million in 1996 as compared to $8.6
million in 1995. An increase of $36,000 is attributable to the acquisition of
the remaining partnership interests in three partnerships during 1995, an
increase of $57,000 is attributable to property acquisitions and an increase of
$570,000 is due to increased depreciation from property additions and tenant
improvements. These increases were more than offset by a decreases of $645,000
due to properties sold and $179,000 due to assets becoming fully depreciated.
The advisory fee of $1.8 million in 1996 was comparable to the $1.8 million in
1995.
General and administrative expenses increased to $2.7 million in 1996 from $2.0
million in 1995. The increase is due to an increase in legal fees related to
the Olive litigation. (See NOTE 15. "COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES.")
In 1996 and 1995 the Company received litigation settlements of $1.5 million
and $500,000, respectively.
In the second quarter of 1996, the Company recognized a provision for loss of
$1.6 million to reduce the carrying value of an office building to its agreed
sales price less estimated costs of sale. Sale of the property was completed
in July 1996. No provision for loss was recognized in 1995.
Equity in losses of investees was $20,000 in 1996 compared to $1.1 million in
1995. The decreased equity loss is primarily due to the 1995 modification of
a wraparound mortgage note receivable and underlying note payable by Nakash
Income Associates ("NIA"), a partnership in which the Company has a 60% general
partner interest, and the writedown of a wraparound mortgage note receivable to
the balance of an underlying
33
<PAGE> 34
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Results of Operations (Continued)
first lien mortgage also by NIA. The Company's equity share of the loss on the
note modification was $127,000 and its equity share of the note writedown was
$901,000. See NOTE 5. "INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD REAL ESTATE ENTITIES."
The Company recognized extraordinary gains totaling $256,000 in 1996 on the
modification of the mortgage debt secured by the Dunes Plaza Shopping Center.
See NOTE 14. "EXTRAORDINARY GAIN." In 1995, the Company recognized
extraordinary gains totaling $1.4 million on the payoff of the mortgage debt
secured by the Fountain Village Apartments and a principal pay down and
modification of the mortgage debt secured by the Dunes Plaza Shopping Center.
In 1996, the Company recognized gains of $218,000, $1.4 million and $56,000
from the sales of Cheyenne Mountain land, Park Forest Apartments and Moss Creek
land. In September 1996, the Company recognized a loss of $63,000 from the
sale of Byron land. In 1995, the Company recognized a gain of $1.6 million on
the collection of the note receivable secured by the Maumelle land and a gain
of $4.1 million on the sale of the Summerchase Apartments. See NOTE 3. "REAL
ESTATE AND DEPRECIATION."
Environmental Matters
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and
regulations, the Company may be potentially liable for removal or remediation
costs, as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic
substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property)
where property-level managers have arranged for the removal, disposal or
treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain environmental
laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the
air, and third parties may seek recovery from the Company for personal injury
associated with such materials.
The Company's management is not aware of any environmental liability relating
to the above matters that would have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, assets or results of operations.
Inflation
The effects of inflation on the Company's operations are not quantifiable.
Revenues from property operations fluctuate proportionately with inflationary
increases and decreases in housing costs. Fluctuations in the rate of
inflation also affect sale values of properties, and correspondingly, the
ultimate realizable value of the Company's real estate and notes receivable
portfolios. Inflation also has an effect on the Company's earnings from
short-term investments.
34
<PAGE> 35
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Tax Matters
For the years 1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company elected and in the opinion of
the Company's management, qualified to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment
Trust ("REIT") as defined under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). To continue to qualify for
federal taxation as a REIT under the Code, the Company is required to hold at
least 75% of the value of its total assets in real estate assets, government
securities, cash and cash equivalents at the close of each quarter of each
taxable year. The Code also requires a REIT to distribute at least 95% of its
REIT taxable income, plus 95% of its net income from foreclosure property, all
as defined in Section 857 of the Code, on an annual basis to stockholders.
YEAR 2000
The Company's advisor has advised the Company that its current computer
software has been certified by the Information Technology Association of
America ("ITAA") as year 2000 compliant. The Company's advisor has also
advised the Company that it has recently received and plans to install in 1998
the ITAA certified year 2000 compliant operating system for its computer
hardware.
35
<PAGE> 36
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants............ 37
Consolidated Balance Sheets -
December 31, 1997 and 1996................................... 38
Consolidated Statements of Operations -
Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................. 39
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity -
Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................. 40
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995................. 41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................... 44
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation....... 64
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate................... 68
</TABLE>
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not
applicable or the information required is included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements or the notes thereto.
36
<PAGE> 37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors of
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Transcontinental
Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. We have
also audited the schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial
statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedules are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and
schedules. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We believe our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
Also, in our opinion, the schedules referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
BDO Seidman, LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 12, 1998
37
<PAGE> 38
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------------
1997 1996
--------- ---------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Notes and interest receivable
Performing ....................................... $ 4,388 $ 9,075
Nonperforming, nonaccruing ....................... 450 457
--------- ---------
4,838 9,532
Less - allowance for estimated losses .............. (891) (926)
--------- ---------
3,947 8,606
Foreclosed real estate held for sale ............... 1,356 910
Real estate held for sale, net of accumulated
depreciation ($1,350 in 1997 and $76 in 1996) .... 3,630 2,089
--------- ---------
4,986 2,999
Real estate held for investment, net of
accumulated depreciation ($55,487 in 1997 and
$50,310 in 1996) ................................. 270,245 217,410
Investment in real estate entities ................. 4,333 4,578
Cash and cash equivalents .......................... 24,733 960
Other assets (including $497 in 1997 and $960 in
1996 from affiliates) ............................ 11,291 10,818
--------- ---------
$ 319,535 $ 245,371
========= =========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Notes and interest payable ......................... $ 222,029 $ 158,692
Other liabilities (including $1,157 in 1997 and $535
in 1996 to affiliates) ........................... 10,973 7,320
--------- ---------
233,002 166,012
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity
Common Stock, $.01 par value; authorized, 10,000,000
shares; issued and outstanding 3,889,200 shares
in 1997 and 3,926,445 shares in 1996 ............. 39 39
Paid-in capital .................................... 217,688 218,133
Accumulated distributions in excess of accumulated
earnings ......................................... (131,194) (138,813)
--------- ---------
86,533 79,359
--------- ---------
$ 319,535 $ 245,371
========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
38
<PAGE> 39
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
----------- ----------- -----------
(dollars in thousands, except per share)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues
Rents ............................... $ 54,462 $ 45,405 $ 46,770
Interest ............................ 1,499 1,473 1,502
----------- ----------- -----------
55,961 46,878 48,272
Expenses
Property operations (including
$2,262 in 1997, $1,879 in 1996
and $2,928 in 1995 to affiliates) 32,424 28,491 30,211
Interest .......................... 16,765 14,999 16,114
Depreciation ...................... 9,578 8,461 8,619
Advisory fee to affiliate ......... 1,807 1,784 1,770
Net income fee to affiliate ....... 1,022 -- --
General and administrative
(including $1,187 in 1997, $1,047
in 1996 and $877 in 1995 to
affiliates) ..................... 2,645 2,685 1,960
Litigation settlement ............. -- (1,500) (500)
Provision for losses .............. 1,337 1,579 --
----------- ----------- -----------
65,578 56,499 58,174
----------- ----------- -----------
(Loss) from operations .............. (9,617) (9,621) (9,902)
Equity in income (loss) of investees 812 (20) (1,083)
Gain on sale of real estate ......... 21,404 1,579 5,822
----------- ----------- -----------
Income (loss) before extraordinary
gain .............................. 12,599 (8,062) (5,163)
Extraordinary gain .................. -- 256 1,437
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) ................... $ 12,599 $ (7,806) $ (3,726)
=========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share
Income (loss) before extraordinary
gain .............................. $ 3.22 $ (2.02) $ (1.29)
Extraordinary gain .................. -- .06 .36
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) ................... $ 3.22 $ (1.96) $ (.93)
=========== =========== ===========
Weighted average Common shares used
in computing earnings per share ..... 3,907,221 3,994,687 4,012,275
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
39
<PAGE> 40
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accumulated
Distributions
Common Stock in Excess of
------------------------ Paid-in Accumulated Stockholders'
Shares Amount Capital Earnings Equity
--------- ------------ ------------ ------------- --------------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January 1, 1995 ..... 4,012,275 $ 40 $ 219,036 $ (125,899) $ 93,177
Dividends ($.07 per
share) ..................... -- -- -- (267) (267)
Net (loss) ................... -- -- -- (3,726) (3,726)
--------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 1995 ... 4,012,275 40 219,036 (129,892) 89,184
Repurchase of Common
Stock ...................... (85,830) (1) (903) -- (904)
Dividends ($.28 per
share) ..................... -- -- -- (1,115) (1,115)
Net (loss) ................... -- -- -- (7,806) (7,806)
--------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 1996 ... 3,926,445 39 218,133 (138,813) 79,359
Fractional shares ............ (18) -- -- -- --
Repurchase of Common Stock ... (37,227) -- (445) -- (445)
Dividends ($.28 per
share) ..................... -- -- -- (1,090) (1,090)
Special dividend ($1.00
per share) declared ........ -- -- -- (3,890) (3,890)
Net income ................... -- -- -- 12,599 12,599
--------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31, 1997 ... 3,889,200 $ 39 $ 217,688 $ (131,194) $ 86,533
========= ============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
40
<PAGE> 41
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Rents collected ............................... $ 57,144 $ 43,401 $ 46,511
Interest collected ............................ 1,098 1,232 1,256
Interest paid ................................. (16,016) (14,167) (14,676)
Payments for property operations
(including $2,262 in 1997, $1,879 in
1996 and $2,928 in 1995 to affiliates) ...... (40,984) (30,738) (31,171)
Advisory and net income fee paid to
affiliate ................................... (1,807) (1,784) (1,770)
General and administrative expenses paid
(including $1,187 in 1997, $1,047 in
1996 and $877 in 1995 to affiliates) ........ (2,457) (2,785) (1,216)
Distributions from operating cash flow of
equity investees ............................ 687 649 666
Litigation settlement ......................... -- 1,500 500
Other ......................................... 1,119 (754) 1,122
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities ............................... (1,216) (3,446) 1,222
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Collections on notes receivable ............... 5,048 952 2,851
Real estate improvements ...................... (5,767) (3,406) (8,024)
Proceeds from sale of real estate ............. 29,081 8,922 24,445
Insurance settlement .......................... 9,633 -- --
Acquisitions of real estate (including
$2,966 in 1997, $339 in 1996 and $56 in
1995 to affiliates) ......................... (46,433) (7,689) (1,339)
Acquisition of partnership interests .......... -- -- (50)
Contributions to equity investees ............. (731) (161) (443)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities .................................... (9,169) (1,382) 17,440
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
41
<PAGE> 42
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Distributions from financing cash flow of
equity investees ............................... $ 1,101 $ -- $ 853
Payments on notes payable ....................... (37,095) (14,545) (35,205)
Proceeds from notes payable ..................... 73,817 13,550 26,072
Dividends paid .................................. (1,090) (1,115) (267)
Shares of Common Stock repurchased .............. (445) (904) --
Deferred financing costs ........................ (2,130) (818) (1,058)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities ....................... 34,158 (3,832) (9,605)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents .................................... 23,773 (8,660) 9,057
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year ..... 960 9,620 563
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year ........... $ 24,773 $ 960 $ 9,620
============ ============ ============
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net
cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
Net income (loss) ............................. $ 12,599 $ (7,806) $ (3,726)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
Depreciation and amortization ............ 10,005 8,857 9,180
Provision for losses ..................... 1,337 1,579 --
Extraordinary gain ....................... -- (256) (1,437)
Equity in (income) loss of equity
investees .............................. (812) 20 1,083
Gain on sale of real estate .............. (21,404) (1,579) (5,822)
Distributions from operating cash flow
of equity investees .................... 687 649 666
(Increase) in interest receivable ........ (244) (5) (4)
Decrease in other assets ................. 3,740 1,759 1,098
Increase in interest payable ............. 165 200 635
(Decrease) in other liabilities .......... (7,289) (6,864) (451)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities ..................................... $ (1,216) $ (3,446) $ 1,222
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
42
<PAGE> 43
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
1997 1996 1995
---------- ---------- ----------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Schedule of noncash investing and financing
activities
Carrying value of real estate acquired
through foreclosure in satisfaction of
notes receivable (with carrying value
of $696) ......................................... $ -- $ 691 $ --
Notes payable from acquisition of real
estate .............................................. 13,606 -- --
Real estate obtained in satisfaction of a
note receivable with no carrying value
Carrying value of real estate received .............. -- -- 2,519
Carrying value of debt assumed ...................... -- -- 2,675
Acquisition of remaining general partner
interests in three partnerships
Carrying value of assets received ................... -- -- 22,807
Carrying value of liabilities assumed ............... -- -- 21,481
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
43
<PAGE> 44
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Transcontinental Realty
Investors, Inc. and consolidated entities (the "Company") have been prepared in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the most significant
of which are described in NOTE 1. "SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES."
These, along with the remainder of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
data presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are as of
December 31 of each year and for the year then ended, unless otherwise
indicated. Dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.
Certain balances for 1996 and 1995 have been reclassified to conform to the 1997
presentation. Shares and per share data have been restated for the three for two
forward stock split effected February 15, 1996.
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and Company business. Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
("TCI"), a Nevada corporation, is successor to a California business trust which
was organized on September 6, 1983 and commenced operations on January 31, 1984.
The Company invests in real estate through direct equity ownership and
investments in real estate entities. It also has invests in mortgage loans on
real estate, including first, wraparound and junior mortgage loans.
Basis of consolidation. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of TCI and subsidiaries and partnerships which it controls. All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Accounting estimates. In the preparation of the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles it was
necessary for the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial
Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expense for the year then
ended. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Interest recognition on notes receivable. It is the Company's policy to cease
recognizing interest income on notes receivable that have been delinquent for 60
days or more. In addition, accrued but unpaid interest income is only recognized
to the extent that the net realizable value of the underlying collateral exceeds
the carrying value of the receivable.
Allowance for estimated losses. Valuation allowances are provided for estimated
losses on notes receivable considered to be impaired. Impairment is considered
to exist when it is probable that all amounts due under the terms of the note
will not be collected. Valuation
44
<PAGE> 45
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
allowances are provided for estimated losses on notes receivable to the extent
that the Company's investment in the note exceeds the Company's estimate of fair
value of the collateral securing such note.
Real Estate Held for Investment and Depreciation. Real estate held for
investment is carried at cost. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
121 ( SFAS No. 121") requires that a property be considered impaired, if the sum
of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is
less than the carrying amount of the property. If impairment exists, an
impairment loss is recognized, by a charge against earnings, equal to the amount
by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the fair value of the
property. If impairment of a property is recognized, the carrying amount of the
property is reduced by the amount of the impairment, and a new cost for the
property is established. Such new cost is depreciated over the property's
remaining useful life. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over
estimated useful lives, which range from 3 to 40 years.
Real Estate Held for Sale. Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at new
cost, defined as the lower of original cost or fair value minus estimated costs
of sale. SFAS No. 121 also requires that properties held for sale be reported at
the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs of sale. If a reduction in
a held for sale property's carrying amount to fair value less costs of sale is
required, a provision for loss shall be recognized by a charge against earnings.
Subsequent revisions, either upward or downward, to a held for sale property's
estimated fair value less costs of sale is recorded as an adjustment to the
property's carrying amount, but not in excess of the property's carrying amount
when originally classified as held for sale. A corresponding charge against or
credit to earnings is recognized. Properties held for sale are not depreciated.
Present value discounts. The Company provides for present value discounts on
notes receivable or payable that have interest rates that differ substantially
from prevailing market rates and amortizes such discounts by the interest method
over the lives of the related notes. The factors considered in determining a
market rate for notes receivable include the borrower's credit standing, nature
of the collateral and payment terms of the note.
Revenue recognition on the sale of real estate. Sales of real estate are
recognized when and to the extent permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate" ("SFAS No. 66"). Until
the requirements of SFAS No. 66 for full profit recognition have been met,
transactions are accounted for using either the deposit, the installment, the
cost recovery or the financing method, whichever is appropriate.
45
<PAGE> 46
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Investment in noncontrolled partnerships and equity investees. The Company uses
the equity method to account for investments in partnerships which it does not
control and for its investment in the shares of common stock of Income
Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., ("IORI"). Under the equity method, the
Company's initial investment, recorded at cost, is increased by the Company's
proportionate share of the investee's operating income and additional advances
and decreased by the Company's proportionate share of the investee's operating
losses and distributions received.
Fair value of financial instruments. The Company used the following assumptions
in estimating the fair value of its notes receivable, marketable equity
securities and notes payable. For performing notes receivable, the fair value
was estimated by discounting future cash flows using current interest rates for
similar loans. For nonperforming notes receivable, the estimated fair value of
the Company's interest in the collateral property was used. For marketable
equity securities, fair value was based on the year end closing market price of
the security. For notes payable, the fair value was estimated using current
rates for mortgages with similar terms and maturities.
Cash equivalents. For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the
Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Earnings per share. Income (loss) per share is computed based upon the weighted
average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during each year adjusted
for the three for two forward stock split effected February 15, 1996. The
Company adopted SFAS 128, earnings per share, in 1997. The adoption had no
impact on the financial statements of the Company.
NOTE 2. NOTES AND INTEREST RECEIVABLE
Notes and interest receivable consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
----------------------- ----------------------
Estimated Estimated
Fair Book Fair Book
Value Value Value Value
--------- --------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Notes receivable
Performing.................. $ 7,264 $ 4,389 $ 12,409 $ 9,544
Nonperforming, nonaccruing.. 1,400 449 1,400 457
--------- -------- ---------- --------
$ 8,664 4,838 $ 13,809 10,001
========= ==========
Interest receivable........... 3 47
Unamortized (discounts)....... (3) (516)
-------- --------
$ 4,838 $ 9,532
======== ========
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE> 47
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 2. NOTES AND INTEREST RECEIVABLE (Continued)
The Company does not recognize interest income on nonperforming notes
receivable. For the years 1997, 1996 and 1995, unrecognized interest income on
nonperforming notes receivable totaled $257,000, $424,000 and $231,000,
respectively.
Notes receivable at December 31, 1997, mature from 1998 through 2012 with
interest rates ranging from 3.875% to 12.5%, with a weighted average rate of
9.9%. Discounts were based on imputed interest rates at the time of origination.
Notes receivable are generally nonrecourse and are generally collateralized by
real estate. Scheduled principal maturities of $661,000 are due in 1998.
In 1997, the Company accepted discounted payoffs totaling $4.9 million in
settlement of two mortgage notes receivable with a combined principal balance of
$5.0 million. The Company recognized no loss on the note settlements in excess
of the reserves previously established.
In February 1994, the Company provided $6.7 million of purchase money financing
in conjunction with the sale of 1,406 acres of land in sixteen developed
residential and commercial subdivisions secured by a first mortgage on the
properties sold. The borrower did not make the scheduled February 1995 principal
and interest payments. In September 1995, the Company reached a settlement with
the borrower that provided the following: (i) the payment by the borrower of
$2.5 million in cash; (ii) the Company's release of all land securing the note;
(iii) the Company's acceptance of a new $1.4 million note secured by 36.3 acres
of commercial land, such note bore interest at 9.0% and matured in January 1996
and (iv) the Company's receipt of 700,000 shares of the borrower's capital
stock, which the borrower had the option to repurchase at $5.00 per share for
two years from closing. The original sale had been recorded under the cost
recovery method with gain being deferred until the note was collected. With the
Company's receipt of $2.5 million on September 12, 1995, it recognized $1.6
million of the gain previously deferred. The $1.4 million note was not paid at
maturity. The Company has reached a settlement with the borrower in an effort to
correct the default. Per the settlement agreement, the borrower is to pay
$17,500 per month in non-refundable fees, for five consecutive months effective
November 1997. In return the Company has agreed to delay pursuing its remedies
under the note until April 1998. The Company has collected all five payments. If
the borrower should not payoff the note in April 1998, the Company does not
expect to incur a loss on the note as the fair value of the collateral property
exceeds the nominal carrying value of the note.
NOTE 3. REAL ESTATE AND DEPRECIATION
In February 1997, the Company completed the sale of the Fiesta Mart, a 29,000
square foot shopping center in San Angelo, Texas, which was under contract for
sale at December 31, 1996, for $544,000 in cash. The Company received net cash
of $403,000 after the payoff of $90,000 in
47
<PAGE> 48
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 3. REAL ESTATE AND DEPRECIATION (Continued)
existing mortgage debt and the payment of various closing costs associated with
the sale. The Company recognized no gain or loss on the sale.
Also in February 1997, the Company completed the sale of a .9976 acre parcel of
land in Dallas, Texas, which was under contract for sale at December 31, 1996,
for $2.7 million in cash. The Company received net cash of $2.6 million after
the payment of various closing costs associated with the sale. The Company
recognized a gain of $1.4 million on the sale.
In March 1997, the Company purchased the Terrace Hills Apartments, a 310 unit
apartment complex in El Paso, Texas, for $6.2 million. The Company paid $1.4
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $4.8 million.
Also in March 1997, the Company purchased the Crescent Place Apartments, a 120
unit apartment complex in Houston, Texas, for $2.3 million. The Company paid
$500,000 in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $1.8 million.
Further in March 1997, the Company purchased the Savings of America Building, a
68,634 square foot office building in Houston, Texas, for $1.6 million in cash.
In April 1997, the Company sold a foreclosed single family residence in
Scottsdale, Arizona, for $778,000 in cash. The Company recognized a gain of
$55,000 on the sale.
In May 1997, the Company purchased the Treehouse Apartments, a 160 unit
apartment complex in Irving, Texas, for $3.4 million in cash.
Also in May 1997, the Company purchased the Villas at Countryside Apartments, a
102 unit apartment complex in Sterling, Virginia, for $6.3 million. The Company
paid $1.1 million in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $5.2 million.
In August 1997, the Company purchased a 8.844 acre parcel of undeveloped land in
downtown Dallas, Texas, for $11.0 million. The Company paid $2.2 million in cash
with the seller providing purchase money financing of the remaining $8.8 million
of the purchase price.
In September 1997, the Company purchased Bonita Plaza, a 47,777 square foot
office building in Bonita, California, for $5.7 million. The Company paid $1.7
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $4.0 million.
Also in September 1997, the Company purchased the Country Bend Apartments, a 166
unit apartment complex in Fort Worth, Texas, for $3.4 million. The Company paid
$743,000 in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $2.6 million.
48
<PAGE> 49
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 3. REAL ESTATE AND DEPRECIATION (Continued)
In October 1997, the Company purchased the Sandstone Apartments, a 238 unit
apartment complex in Mesa, Arizona, for $7.9 million. The Company paid $2.0
million in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $5.9 million.
Also in October 1997, the Company purchased the Encon Warehouse, a 279,290
square foot industrial warehouse facility in Fort Worth, Texas, for $4.7
million. The Company paid $1.2 million in cash and obtained new mortgage
financing of $3.5 million.
Further in October 1997, the Company purchased the Sunchase Apartments, a 300
unit apartment complex in Odessa, Texas, for $3.6 million. The Company paid $1.5
million in cash and assumed the existing mortgage of $2.1 million.
In November 1997, the Company sold President's Square, a 46,509 square foot
shopping center in San Antonio, Texas, for $2.6 million in cash. The Company
received net cash of $470,000 after the payoff of $1.9 million in existing
mortgage debt and the payment of various closing costs associated with the sale.
The Company recognized a gain of $554,000 on the sale.
In December 1997, the Company purchased the Fairpark Apartments, a 49 unit
apartment complex in Los Angeles, California, for $2.0 million. The Company paid
$500,000 in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $1.5 million.
Further in December 1997, the Company purchased the Villa Piedra Apartments, a
132 unit apartment complex in Los Angeles, California, for $4.7 million. The
Company paid $1.2 million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $3.5
million.
Further in December 1997, the Company purchased the Timbers Apartments, a 180
unit apartment complex in Tyler, Texas, for $2.3 million. The Company paid
$500,000 in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $1.8 million.
In December 1997, the Company purchased the Lexington Center, a 74,603 square
foot office building in Colorado Springs, Colorado, for $5.3 million. The
Company paid $1.3 million in cash with the seller providing purchase money
financing of the remaining $4.0 million of the purchase price.
Also in December 1997, the Company sold Republic Towers, a three building,
1,324,624 square foot office facility in Dallas, Texas, for $24.0 million in
cash. The Company received net cash of $23.5 million after the payment of
various closing costs associated with the sale. In January 1997, the Company
received a final insurance settlement totaling $9.6 million from the 1995 hail
storm and flood damage to the building. The Company recognized a gain of $19.4
million on the sale.
49
<PAGE> 50
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 3. REAL ESTATE AND DEPRECIATION (Continued)
During 1996, the Company purchased (i) a 4.7 acre parcel of partially developed
land in Las Colinas, Texas for $941,000 in cash, (ii) the Carseka Apartments in
Los Angeles, California for $2.2 million in cash, (iii) three residential lots
in Greensboro, North Carolina for $44,000 in cash, (iv) in a single transaction,
the Arbor Point Apartments, Southgate Apartments, Westwood Apartments and
Coventry Apartments, in Odessa and Midland, Texas for $4.1 million in cash, and
(v) obtained through foreclosure a 5,551 square foot single family residence in
Scottsdale, Arizona that secured one of the Company's mortgage notes receivable.
Also in 1996, the Company sold a 7 acre parcel of foreclosed undeveloped land in
Colorado Springs, Colorado for $330,000, a foreclosed apartment complex in
Dearborn Heights, Michigan for $1.6 million, an office building in Oakland,
California for $2.2 million, a 177 acre tract of the Moss Creek land and a 257
acre parcel of foreclosed land in Greensboro, North Carolina for $750,000 and a
522 acre parcel of foreclosed land in Greensboro, North Carolina for $1.6
million. The Company received net cash of $6.2 million from the sales after the
payoff of $2.9 million in existing mortgage debt. The Company recognized a gain
of $1.6 million on such sales.
NOTE 4. ALLOWANCE FOR ESTIMATED LOSSES
Activity in the allowance for estimated losses on notes and interest receivable
was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance January 1, ................ $ 926 $ 1,049 $ 960
Amounts charged off ............ (35) (123) (12)
Recoveries ..................... -- -- 101
------- ------- -------
Balance December 31, .............. $ 891 $ 926 $ 1,049
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The 1997 provision for losses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations is the December 1997 write down of Shaws Plaza, a 103,482 square foot
shopping center in Sharon, Massachusetts to its agreed sales price less
estimated selling costs.
NOTE 5. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD REAL ESTATE ENTITIES
The Company's investments in equity method real estate entities consists of the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. ........
("IORI") ....................................... $ 853 $ 291
Tri-City Limited Partnership ("Tri-City") ....... 4,146 5,123
Nakash Income Associates ("NIA") ................. (770) (954)
Other ............................................ 105 118
------- -------
$ 4,334 $ 4,578
======= =======
</TABLE>
The Company owns an approximate 22.5% interest in IORI, a publicly held Real
Estate Investment Trust ("REIT"), with a market value of $3.9
50
<PAGE> 51
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 5. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD REAL ESTATE ENTITIES (Continued)
million at December 31, 1997. At December 31, 1997, IORI had total assets of
$90.3 million and owned four apartment complexes in Texas and ten office
buildings (six in California, one in Florida, two in Texas and one in Virginia).
The Company owns a combined 63.7% general and limited partner interest in
Tri-City which owns five properties in Texas, consisting of three apartment
complexes, an office building and a shopping center. The Tri-City partnership
agreement requires the consent of both the Company and IORI (a 36.3% general
partner) for any material changes in the operations of Tri-City's properties,
including sales, refinancings and changes in property management. The Company,
as a noncontrolling partner, accounts for its investment in Tri-City using the
equity method.
In September 1997, Tri-City obtained mortgage financing of $1.9 million secured
by the previously unencumbered Oaks of Inwood and Inwood Green Apartments. The
Company received $1.1 million of the net financing proceeds.
The Company owns a 60% general partner interest and IORI owns a 40% general
partner interest in NIA. The NIA partnership agreement requires the consent of
both the Company and IORI for any material changes in the operations of NIA. The
Company, as a noncontrolling partner, accounts for its investment in NIA on the
equity method. NIA owned two wraparound mortgage notes receivable, one of which
was secured by a shopping center in Onandaga, New York. In July 1995, the owner
of the shopping center informed NIA that it had determined that further
investment in the shopping center was not justified, and further that it had
offered to deed the property back to the first lienholder in lieu of foreclosure
making the wraparound note receivable held by NIA uncollectible. NIA recorded a
provision for loss of $1.5 million to write down its wraparound note receivable
to the balance of the mortgage. The Company's equity share of the loss was
$901,000. The property was returned to the lender in 1996. In September 1995,
the Company received notice from NIA that the other of its wraparound notes
receivable secured by a shopping center in Maulden, Missouri had been modified
in conjunction with the modification of the underlying note payable. NIA
recorded a provision for loss of $212,000 on such modification of which the
Company's share was $127,000. In August 1997, the owner of the shopping center
refinanced the matured mortgage in the amount of $850,000. The Company
contributed an additional $271,000 to NIA to payoff the existing $1.0 million
mortgage.
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
51
<PAGE> 52
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 5. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY METHOD REAL ESTATE ENTITIES (Continued)
Set forth below are summary financial data for the real estate entities the
Company accounts for using the equity method:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Real estate, net of accumulated
depreciation ($9,967 in 1997
and $11,467 in 1996) ...................... $ 94,145 $ 65,481
Notes receivable ............................ 2,912 2,883
Other assets ................................ 7,272 8,757
Notes payable ............................... (68,155) (43,807)
Other liabilities ........................... (4,455) (2,983)
-------- --------
Partners' capital ........................... $ 31,719 $ 30,331
======== ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rents and interest income ................... $ 19,652 $ 12,319 $ 10,862
Depreciation ................................ (2,139) (1,685) (1,748)
Operating expenses .......................... (9,485) (7,927) (7,092)
Interest expense ............................ (4,579) (3,086) (2,677)
Provision for losses ........................ -- -- (1,714)
-------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) ........................... $ 3,449 $ (379) $ (2,369)
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The Company's equity share of the above net income (losses) for 1997, 1996 and
1995 was $835,000, $(2,000) and $(1.1) million, respectively, before
amortization of property acquisition costs discussed below. The Company's share
of the above equity investee capital was $9.9 million in 1997 and $10.0 million
in 1996.
The excess of the Company's investment over its respective share of the equity
in the underlying net assets of equity investees relates primarily to
unamortized property acquisition costs of $113,000 in 1997, $116,000 in 1996 and
$119,000 in 1995. These amounts are being amortized over the estimated useful
lives of the properties.
NOTE 6. NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE
Notes and interest payable consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
--------------------- -----------------------
Estimated Estimated
Fair Book Fair Book
Value Value Value Value
--------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Notes payable............... $ 219,056 $ 220,437 $ 155,035 $ 157,309
========= 1,592 ========= 1,383
Interest payable............ --------- ---------
$ 222,029 $ 158,692
========= =========
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE> 53
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 6. NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE (Continued)
Scheduled principal payments are due as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998 ............................................. $ 25,085
1999 ............................................. 18,080
2000 ............................................. 10,539
2001 ............................................. 15,343
2002 ............................................. 23,220
Thereafter ....................................... 128,170
--------
$220,437
========
</TABLE>
Mortgage notes payable at December 31, 1997 bear interest at rates ranging from
7.4% to 10.25% per annum, and mature between 1998 and 2024. The mortgages are
collateralized by deeds of trust on real estate with a net carrying value of
$272.2 million.
In 1997, the company purchased ten apartment complexes, three office buildings,
one industrial warehouse facility and one parcel of land for a total of $69.9
million. In conjunction with the purchases, the Company either assumed existing
mortgage debt or obtained new mortgage financing totaling $49.4 million. The
mortgages bear interest at rates ranging from 8.0% to 10.25% per annum, require
monthly payments of principal and interest, currently totaling $417,208, and
mature from June 1998 to December 2017.
In January 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured by 74
New Montgomery, an office building in San Francisco, California, in the amount
of $6.3 million. The Company received net cash of $1.0 million after the payoff
of $5.2 million in existing mortgage debt, funding a tax escrow and the payment
of various closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears
interest at a variable rate, currently 9.25% per annum, requires monthly
payments of principal and interest of $53,996 and matures in January 2004.
Also in January 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured
by the Woods Edge Apartments in Rockville, Maryland in the amount of $6.2
million. The Company received no net cash. The refinancing proceeds were used to
payoff $5.9 million in existing mortgage debt, funding a tax escrow and the
payment of various closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage
bears interest at 8.125% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and
interest of $46,035 and matures in February 2007.
In February 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured by
the Spa Cove Apartments in Annapolis, Maryland in the amount of $12.2 million.
The Company received net cash of $245,000 after the payoff of $11.6 million in
existing mortgage debt, funding a tax escrow and the payment of various closing
costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears interest at 8.015%
per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $89,529 and
matures in March 2007.
53
<PAGE> 54
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 6. NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE (Continued)
In March 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt scheduled to mature in
December 1997, secured by the President's Square Shopping Center in San Antonio,
Texas, in the amount of $1.9 million. The Company received net cash of $600,000
after the payoff of $1.2 million in existing mortgage debt and the payment of
various closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears
interest at 9.44% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest
of $16,521 and matures in March 2009.
In May 1997, the mortgage debt in the amount of $618,000 secured by the
Sheboygan Shopping Center in Sheboygan, Wisconsin matured. The Company elected
to exercise its option to extend the maturity date to May 1999.
In June 1997, the Company obtained mortgage financing in the amount of $2.8
million secured by the previously unencumbered Treehouse Apartments in Irving,
Texas. The Company received net cash of $2.3 million after funding required tax
and repair escrows and the payment of various closing costs associated with the
financing. The mortgage bears interest at 8.28% per annum, requires monthly
payments of principal and interest of $21,994 and matures in July 2007.
In August 1996, the Company modified and extended the matured loan secured by
the Northtown Mall Shopping Center in Dallas, Texas by making $450,000 in
principal paydowns to extend the loan to March 31, 1997. The Company did not
payoff the loan at maturity. In October 1997, the Company made a $200,000
principal paydown to extend the loan to December 31, 1997. In December 1997, the
Company made an additional $100,000 principal paydown and extended the loan to
March 31, 1998. The loan had a principal balance of $2.5 million at December 31,
1997.
Also in August 1997, the Company obtained mortgage financing in the amount of
$1.3 million secured by the previously unencumbered Savings of America Office
Building in Houston, Texas. The Company received net cash of $1.2 million after
funding a required tax escrow and the payment of various closing costs
associated with the financing. The mortgage bears interest at 8.49% per annum,
requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $10,371 and matures in
September 2007.
Further in August 1997, the mortgage debt in the amount of $2.6 million secured
by the Shaws Plaza Shopping Center in Sharon, Massachusetts matured. In November
1997, the mortgage's maturity date was extended to May 1998, all other terms
remained unchanged.
In September 1997, the Company obtained mortgage financing in the amount of $1.5
million secured by the previously unencumbered Carseka Apartments in Los
Angeles, California. The Company received net cash of $1.5 million after funding
required tax and insurance escrows and the payment of various closing costs
associated with the financing. The mortgage bears interest at 7.6% per annum,
requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $10,768 and matures in
October 2007.
54
<PAGE> 55
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 6. NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE (Continued)
In October 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt secured by the South
Cochran Apartments in Los Angeles, California in the amount of $2.0 million. The
Company received net cash of $921,000 after the payoff of $902,000 in existing
mortgage debt, the funding of tax and insurance escrows and the payment of
various closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears
interest at 7.62% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest
of $13,795 and matures in November 2007.
In December 1997, the Company refinanced the matured mortgage debt secured by
the Majestic Inn, in San Francisco, California in the amount of $5.7 million.
The Company received net cash of $4.5 million after the payoff of $950,000 in
existing mortgage debt, the funding of escrows and the payment of various
closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears interest at
8.31% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $46,376
and matures in January 2005.
Also in December 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt secured by
Corporate Center at Beaumeade, an industrial warehouse facility in Ashburn,
Virginia in the amount of $7.0 million. The Company received net cash of $2.1
million after the payoff of $4.6 million in existing mortgage debt, the funding
of escrows and the payment of various closing costs associated with the
financing. The new mortgage bears interest at 7.4% per annum, requires monthly
payments of principal and interest of $51,275 and matures in January 2008.
Further in December 1997, the Company refinanced the mortgage debt secured by
the Corporate Pointe Office Building in Chantilly, Virginia in the amount of
$4.0 million. The Company received net cash of $944,000 after the payoff of $2.8
million in existing mortgage debt, the funding of escrows and the payment of
various closing costs associated with the financing. The new mortgage bears
interest at 7.75% per annum, requires monthly payments of principal and interest
of $30,364 and matures in January 2008.
In 1996, the Company purchased five apartment complexes and one parcel of
developed land for a total of $13.4 million in cash.
In 1996, the Company obtained mortgage financing totaling $2.0 million on four
previously unencumbered apartment complexes. The Company received net cash of
$1.7 million after the funding of escrows and the payment of various closing
costs associated with the financings. The mortgages bear interest at variable
rates and mature in May 2000. Also in 1996, the Company refinanced the mortgage
debt secured by one commercial property and one apartment complex, in the total
amount of
55
<PAGE> 56
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 6. NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE (Continued)
$9.5 million. The Company received net financing proceeds of $897,000 after the
payoff of $7.9 million in existing mortgage debt, the funding of escrows and the
payment of various closing costs associated with the financings. The mortgages
bear interest at rates ranging from 9.1875% to 9.5625% per annum and mature from
June 2006 to August 2006. Also in 1996, the Company increased by $2.0 million
the mortgage principal balance on a mortgage secured by an office building as
provided by the original mortgage. The Company received net cash of $1.9 million
after the payment of various closing costs associated with the additional
borrowing.
NOTE 7. DIVIDENDS
The Company has paid quarterly dividends since the fourth quarter of 1995. In
1997, the Company paid dividends of $.28 per share, or a total of $1.1 million.
In 1996, the Company paid dividends of $.28 per share or a total of $1.1
million. In addition, the Company declared a special dividend of $1.00 per
share in December 1997. These dividends were paid in January 1998.
The Company reported to the Internal Revenue Service that 100% of the dividends
paid in 1997 represented capital gains and 100% of the dividends paid in 1996
and 1995 represented a return of capital.
NOTE 8. RENTS UNDER OPERATING LEASES
The Company's operations include the leasing of office buildings, industrial
warehouses and shopping centers. The leases thereon expire at various dates
through 2016. The following is a schedule of minimum future rents on
non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998 ............................................. $21,749
1999 ............................................. 17,475
2000 ............................................. 12,552
2001 ............................................. 9,305
2002 ............................................. 6,616
Thereafter ....................................... 18,005
-------
$85,702
=======
</TABLE>
NOTE 9. ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Basic Capital Management, Inc. ("BCM" or the "Advisor") has served as advisor to
the Company since March 28, 1989. BCM is a company owned by a trust for the
benefit of the children of Gene E. Phillips. Mr. Phillips served as a Director
of the Company until December 31, 1992, as a director of BCM until December 22,
1989 and as Chief Executive Officer of BCM until September 1, 1992. Mr. Phillips
serves as a representative of his children's trust which owns BCM and, in such
capacity, has substantial contact with the management of BCM and input with
respect to its performance of advisory services to the Company.
56
<PAGE> 57
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 9. ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Continued)
At the Company's annual meeting of stockholders held on May 8, 1997, the
Company's stockholders approved the renewal of the Company's Advisory Agreement
with BCM through the next annual meeting of the Company's stockholders.
Subsequent renewals of the Advisory Agreement with BCM do not require the
approval of the Company's stockholders but do require the approval of the
Company's Board of Directors.
Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is required to formulate and submit
annually for approval by the Company's Board of Directors a budget and business
plan for the Company containing a twelve-month forecast of operations and cash
flow, a general plan for asset sales and acquisitions, lending, foreclosure and
borrowing activity and other investments. The Advisor is required to report
quarterly to the Company's Board of Directors on the Company's performance
against the business plan. In addition, all transactions or investments by the
Company shall require prior approval by the Company's Board of Directors unless
they are explicitly provided for in the approved business plan or are made
pursuant to authority expressly delegated to the Advisor by the Company's Board
of Directors. The Advisory Agreement also requires prior approval of the
Company's Board of Directors for the retention of all consultants and third
party professionals, other than legal counsel.
The Advisory Agreement provides for BCM to be responsible for the day-to-day
operations of the Company and to receive an advisory fee comprised of a gross
asset fee of .0625% per month (.75% per annum) of the average of the gross asset
value of the Company (total assets less allowance for amortization, depreciation
or depletion and valuation reserves) and an annual net income fee equal to 7.5%
per annum of the Company's net income.
The Advisory Agreement also provides for BCM to receive an annual incentive
sales fee. BCM or an affiliate of BCM is to receive an acquisition commission
for supervising the acquisition, purchase or long-term lease of real estate for
the Company. BCM or an affiliate of BCM is to receive a mortgage or loan
acquisition fee with respect to the acquisition or purchase of any existing
mortgage loan by the Company. BCM or an affiliate of BCM is also to receive a
mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee for obtaining loans to the Company
or refinancing on Company properties and BCM is to receive reimbursement of
certain expenses incurred by it in the performance of advisory services to the
Company.
The Advisory Agreement requires BCM or any affiliate of BCM to pay to the
Company one-half of any compensation received from third parties with respect to
the origination, placement or brokerage of any loan made by the Company.
Under the Advisory Agreement, all or a portion of the annual advisory fee must
be refunded by the Advisor to the Company if the Operating Expenses of the
Company (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) exceed
57
<PAGE> 58
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 9. ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Continued)
certain limits specified in the Advisory Agreement. The effect of this
limitation was to require that BCM refund $206,000, $87,000 and $246,000 of the
annual advisory fee for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Additionally, if the Company were to request that BCM render services to the
Company other than those required by the Advisory Agreement, BCM or an affiliate
of BCM will be separately compensated for such additional services on terms to
be agreed upon from time to time. As discussed in NOTE 10. "PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT," the Company has hired Carmel Realty Services, Ltd. ("Carmel,
Ltd."), an affiliate of BCM, to perform property management for the Company's
properties and as discussed in NOTE 11. "REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE," has engaged, on
a non-exclusive basis, Carmel Realty, Inc. ("Carmel Realty"), also an affiliate
of BCM, to provide brokerage services for the Company.
NOTE 10. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Carmel, Ltd. provides property management services to the Company for a fee of
5% or less of the monthly gross rents collected on the properties under its
management. Carmel, Ltd. subcontracts with other entities for the property-level
management services to the Company at various rates. The general partner of
Carmel, Ltd. is BCM. The limited partners of Carmel, Ltd. are (i) First Equity
Properties, Inc. ("First Equity"), which is 50% owned by BCM, (ii) Gene E.
Phillips and (iii) a trust for the benefit of the children of Mr. Phillips.
Carmel, Ltd. subcontracts the property-level management and leasing of 26 of the
Company's commercial properties, its hotel and the commercial properties owned
by Tri-City in which the Company and IORI are partners to Carmel Realty, which
is a company owned by First Equity. Carmel Realty is entitled to receive
property and construction management fees and leasing commissions in accordance
with the terms of its property-level management agreement with Carmel, Ltd.
NOTE 11. REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE
Carmel Realty provides brokerage services to the Company on a non-exclusive
basis. Carmel Realty is entitled to receive a commission for property purchases
and sales, in accordance with a sliding scale of total brokerage fees to be paid
by the Company.
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
58
<PAGE> 59
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 12. ADVISORY FEES, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FEES, ETC.
Fees and cost reimbursements to BCM and its affiliates:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fees
Advisory ............................. $1,807 $1,784 $1,770
Net income ........................... 1,022 -- --
Property acquisition ................. 2,966 339 56
Real estate brokerage ................ 738 283 301
Mortgage brokerage and equity
refinancing ........................ 517 136 104
Property and construction
management and leasing
commissions* ......................... 2,262 1,879 2,928
------ ------ ------
$9,312 $4,421 $5,159
====== ====== ======
Cost reimbursements .................... $1,187 $1,047 $ 877
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- -----------------------
* Net of property management fees paid to subcontractors, other than Carmel
Realty.
NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES
For the years 1997, 1996 and 1995, the Company has elected and qualified to be
treated as a REIT, as defined in Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and as such, will not be taxed
for federal income tax purposes on that portion of its taxable income which is
distributed to stockholders, provided that at least 95% of its REIT taxable
income, plus 95% of its taxable income from foreclosure property as defined in
Section 857 of the Code, is distributed. See NOTE 7. "DIVIDENDS."
The Company had a loss for federal income tax purposes (after utilization of
operating loss carryforwards) in 1997, 1996 and 1995; therefore, the Company
recorded no provision for income taxes.
The Company's tax basis in its net assets differs from the amount at which its
net assets are reported for financial statement purposes, principally due to the
accounting for gains and losses on property sales, the difference in the
allowance for estimated losses, depreciation on owned properties and investments
in joint venture partnerships. At December 31, 1997, the Company's tax basis in
its net assets exceeded its basis for financial statement purposes by $11.0
million. As a result, aggregate future income for income tax purposes will be
less than such amount for financial statement purposes, and the Company would be
able to maintain its REIT status without distributing 95% of its financial
statement income. Additionally, at December 31, 1997, the Company had tax net
operating loss carryforwards of $63.0 million expiring through the year 2011.
59
<PAGE> 60
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES (Continued)
As a result of the Company's election to be treated as a REIT for income tax
purposes and of its intention to distribute its taxable income, if any, in
future years, no deferred tax asset, liability or valuation allowance was
recorded.
NOTE 14. EXTRAORDINARY GAIN
In 1996, the Company recognized an extraordinary gain of $256,000 on the
principal reductions of the mortgage debt, granted for capital improvements made
to the Dunes Plaza Shopping Center.
In 1995, the Company recognized extraordinary gains totaling $1.4 million on the
payoff of the mortgage debt secured by the Fountain Village Apartments and a
principal pay down and modification of the mortgage debt secured by the Dunes
Plaza Shopping Center.
NOTE 15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Olive Litigation. In February 1990, the Company, together with CMET, IORI and
National Income Realty Trust, three real estate entities with, at the time, the
same officers, directors or trustees and advisor as the Company, entered into a
settlement of a class and derivative action entitled Olive et al. v. National
Income Realty Trust et al., relating to the operation and management of each of
such entities. On April 23, 1990, the Court granted final approval of the terms
of the settlement.
On May 4, 1994, the parties entered into a Modification of Stipulation of
Settlement dated April 27, 1994 (the "Olive Modification") that settled
subsequent claims of breaches of the settlement that were asserted by the
plaintiffs and modified certain provisions of the April 1990 settlement. The
Olive Modification was preliminarily approved by the Court on July 1, 1994 and
final Court approval was entered on December 12, 1994. The effective date of the
Olive Modification was January 11, 1995.
The Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the Olive Modification, and during
August and September 1996, the Court held evidentiary hearings to assess
compliance with the terms of the Olive Modification by the various parties. The
Court issued no ruling or order with respect to the matters addressed at the
hearings.
Separately, in 1996, legal counsel for the plaintiffs notified the Company's
Board of Directors that he intended to assert that certain actions taken by the
Board of Directors breached the terms of the Olive Modification. On January 27,
1997, the parties entered into an Amendment to the Olive Modification effective
January 9, 1997 (the "Olive Amendment"), which was submitted to the Court for
approval on January 29, 1997. The Olive Amendment provides for the settlement of
60
<PAGE> 61
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
all matters raised at the evidentiary hearings and by plaintiffs' counsel in his
notices to the Company's Board of Directors. On May 2, 1997, a hearing was held
by the Court to consider approval of the Olive Amendment. As a result of the
hearing, the parties entered into a revised Olive Amendment. The Court issued an
order approving the Olive Amendment on July 3, 1997.
The Olive Amendment provides for the addition of four new unaffiliated members
to the Company's Board of Directors and sets forth new requirements for the
approval of any transactions with certain affiliates until April 28, 1999. In
addition, the Company, CMET, IORI and their stockholders released the defendants
from any claims relating to the plaintiffs' allegations and matters which were
the subject of the evidentiary hearings. The plaintiffs' allegations of any
breaches of the Olive Modification shall be settled by mutual agreement of the
parties or, lacking such agreement, by an arbitration proceeding.
Under the Olive Amendment, all shares of the Company owned by Gene E. Phillips
or any of his affiliates shall be voted at all stockholder meetings of the
Company held until April 28, 1999 in favor of all new members of the Company's
Board of Directors added under the Olive Amendment. The Olive Amendment also
requires that, until April 28, 1999, all shares of the Company owned by Mr.
Phillips or his affiliates in excess of forty percent (40%) of the Company's
outstanding shares shall be voted in proportion to the votes cast by all
non-affiliated stockholders of the Company.
In accordance with the Olive Amendment, Richard W. Douglas, Larry E. Harley and
R. Douglas Leonhard were added to the Company's Board of Directors in January
1998 and Murray Shaw was added to the Company's Board of Directors in February
1998.
Other Litigation. The Company is also involved in various other lawsuits arising
in the ordinary course of business. Management of the Company is of the opinion
that the outcome of these lawsuits will have no material impact on the Company's
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Litigation settlement. In October 1996 and June 1995, the Company received $1.5
million and $500,000, respectively, from the defendants in a lawsuit brought by
the Company against the former owners of an office building in New Jersey and
their agents. The Company made a loan secured by the building in 1987 and filed
a foreclosure action which was subsequently amended in 1990, to include claims
of negligent misrepresentation against the borrowers, their legal counsel,
architect and engineers.
61
<PAGE> 62
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 16. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a tabulation of the Company's quarterly results of operations
for the years 1997 and 1996 (unaudited):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended 1997
----------------------------------------------------
1997 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
- ---- --------- -------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income ............................ $ 12,523 $ 13,674 $ 14,291 $ 15,473
Expenses .......................... 14,437 15,175 16,279 19,687
-------- -------- -------- --------
(Loss) from operations ............ (1,914) (1,501) (1,988) (4,214)
Equity in income (loss) of
investees ....................... 348 429 (97) 132
Gain of sale of real estate ....... 1,400 55 -- 19,949
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) ................. $ (166) $ (1,017) $ (2,085) $ 15,867
======== ======== ======== ========
Earnings Per Share
Net income (loss) ................. $ (.04) $ (.26) $ (.53) $ 4.05
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
In the first quarter of 1997, a gain on sale of real estate of $1.4 million was
recognized on the sale of a .9976 acre parcel of land. In the second quarter of
1997, a gain on sale of real estate of $55,000 was recognized on the sale of a
foreclosed single family residence. In the fourth quarter of 1997, a gain on
sale of real estate of $19.4 million was recognized on the sale of the Republic
Towers Office Building and a gain on the sale of real estate of $554,000 was
recognized on the sale of the President's Square Shopping Center. A provision
for loss of $1.3 million was also recognized in the fourth quarter to writedown
the Shaws Plaza Shopping Center to its agreed sales price less estimated selling
costs.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended 1996
----------------------------------------------------
1996 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
- ---- --------- -------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income ............................. $ 11,570 $ 11,341 $ 11,776 $ 12,191
Expenses ........................... 14,296 15,296 14,055 12,852
-------- -------- -------- --------
(Loss) from operations ............. (2,726) (3,955) (2,279) (661)
Equity in income (loss) of
investees ........................ (45) (1) (56) 82
Gain of sale of real estate ........ 1,650 -- (71) --
Extraordinary gain ................. 48 -- 208 --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net (loss) ......................... $ (1,073) $ (3,956) $ (2,198) $ (579)
======== ======== ======== ========
Earnings Per Share
(Loss) before extraordinary gain ... $ (.28) $ (.99) $ (.60) $ (.15)
Extraordinary gain ................. .01 -- .05 --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net (loss) ......................... $ (.27) $ (.99) $ (.55) $ (.15)
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
62
<PAGE> 63
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 16. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
In the first and third quarters of 1996, extraordinary gains totaling $256,000
were recognized due to mortgage principal reductions granted for specified
capital improvements at the Dunes Plaza Shopping Center. In the fourth quarter
of 1996, the Company received a $1.5 million litigation settlement.
In the first quarter of 1996, gains on sale of real estate of $218,000 and $1.4
million were recognized on the sale of Cheyenne Mountain land and the Park
Forest Apartments, respectively. In the third quarter of 1996, a gain of $56,000
was recognized on the sale of a 177 acre parcel of the Moss Creek land, a loss
of $63,000 was recognized on the sale of the Byron Land and a loss of $64,000
was recognized on the sale of the Latham Square Office Building, a provision for
loss of $1.6 million relating to such sale having been recognized in the second
quarter of 1996.
NOTE 17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January 1998, the Company purchased the Mountain Plaza Apartments, a 188 unit
apartment complex in El Paso, Texas, for $4.0 million. The Company paid $1.0
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $3.0 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 8.2% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest
only and matures in January 2000.
Also in January 1998, the Company purchased the Junction Apartments, a 212 unit
apartment complex in Midland, Texas, for $2.5 million. The Company paid $600,000
in cash with the seller providing purchase money financing of the remaining $1.9
million of the purchase price. The financing bears interest at a variable rate,
currently 8.0% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest only for the
first twenty-four months and thereafter requires monthly payments of principal
and interest of $14,302 and matures in January 2003.
Further in January 1998, the Company purchased the Laws Street land, a 1.41 acre
parcel of land in Dallas, Texas, for $1.9 million in cash.
In January 1998, the Company purchased the Bent Tree Apartments, a 204 unit
apartment complex in Addison, Texas, for $8.1 million. The Company paid $1.7
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $6.4 million. The
mortgage bears interest at 7.2% per annum, requires monthly payments of
principal and interest of $46,054 and matures in February 2008.
In February 1998, the Company purchased Parkway North, a 71,041 square foot
office building in Dallas, Texas, for $5.4 million. The Company paid $1.5
million in cash and obtained new mortgage financing of $3.9 million. The
mortgage bears interest at a variable rate, currently 8.75% per annum, requires
monthly payments of interest only and matures in March 2000.
Also in February 1998, the Company purchased the Lemmon Carlisle land, a 2.14
acre parcel of land in Dallas, Texas, for $3.4 million in cash.
63
<PAGE> 64
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC. SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost
Capitalized Subsequent Gross Amounts of Which Carried
Initial Cost to Acquisition at End of Year
-------------------- --------------------- --------------------------------
Buildings & Buildings & (1)
Property/Location Encumbrances Land Improvements Improvements Other Land Improvements Total
- -------------------- ------------ ------- ------------ ------------ -------- ------- ------------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
APARTMENTS
Arbor Point ............. $ 1,023 $ 321 $ 1,285 $ 448 $ -- $ 321 $ 1,733 $ 2,054
Odessa, TX
Carseka ................. 1,523 460 1,840 75 -- 460 1,915 2,375
Los Angeles, CA
Country Bend ............ 2,566 710 2,842 -- -- 710 2,842 3,552
Fort Worth, TX
Coventry ................ 417 236 369 177 -- 236 546 782
Midland, TX
Crescent Place .......... 1,754 494 1,978 123 -- 494 2,101 2,595
Houston, TX
Fairpark ................ 1,519 425 1,701 -- -- 425 1,701 2,126
Los Angeles, CA
Fountain Village ........ 7,972 1,518 8,352 1,845 (2,375) (2) 1,162 8,178 9,340
Tucson, AZ
Gladstell Forest ........ 2,589 504 2,015 94 -- 541 2,072 2,613
Conroe, TX
Harper's Ferry .......... 1,810 349 1,398 173 -- 379 1,541 1,920
Lafayette, LA
Heritage ................ 2,009 148 839 45 (300) (3) 108 624 732
Tulsa, OK
Mariners Pointe ......... 3,901 716 4,059 590 -- 773 4,592 5,365
St. Petersburg, FL
Sandstone ............... 5,854 1,656 6,625 -- -- 1,656 6,625 8,281
Mesa, AZ
Shadow Run .............. 7,081 1,503 8,229 212 -- 1,503 8,441 9,944
Pinellas Park, FL
South Cochran ........... 1,949 540 2,162 -- -- 540 2,162 2,702
Los Angeles, CA
Southgate ............... 987 335 1,338 273 -- 335 1,611 1,946
Odessa, TX
Spa Cove ................ 12,109 2,254 10,297 3,931 682 (4) 3,261 13,903 17,164
Annapolis, MD
Summerfield ............. 4,715 1,175 4,698 143 -- 1,175 4,841 6,016
Orlando, FL
Summerstone ............. 4,887 1,155 4,618 88 -- 1,155 4,706 5,861
Houston, TX
Sunchase ................ 2,131 742 2,967 61 -- 742 3,028 3,770
Odessa, TX
Terrace Hills ........... 4,724 1,286 5,145 146 -- 1,310 5,267 6,577
El Paso, TX
Timbers ................. 1,800 493 1,974 -- -- 493 1,974 2,467
Tyler, TX
Treehouse ............... 2,768 716 2,865 165 -- 716 3,030 3,746
Irving, TX
Villas at Countryside ... 5,169 1,323 5,290 30 -- 1,323 5,320 6,643
Sterling, VA
Villa Piedra ............ 3,506 979 3,915 -- -- 979 3,915 4,894
Los Angeles, CA
Westgate of Laurel ...... 7,656 849 9,391 186 -- 1,070 9,356 10,426
Laurel, MD
Westwood ................ 309 85 341 107 -- 85 448 533
Odessa, TX
Woodland Hills .......... 1,167 228 913 -- -- 228 913 1,141
San Antonio, TX
Life on Which
Date Depreciation
of in Latest
Con- Statement
Accumulated struc- Date of Operation
Property/Location Depreciation tion Acquired is Computed
- -------------------- ------------ -------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
APARTMENTS
Arbor Point ............. $ 116 1975 8/30/96 5 - 40 years
Odessa, TX
Carseka ................. 62 1971 11/19/96 5 - 40 years
Los Angeles, CA
Country Bend ............ 24 1981 09/25/97 40 years
Fort Worth, TX
Coventry ................ 35 1977 08/30/96 5 - 40 years
Midland, TX
Crescent Place .......... 52 1984 03/28/97 5 - 40 years
Houston, TX
Fairpark ................ 3 1991 12/22/97 40 years
Los Angeles, CA
Fountain Village ........ 3,479 1973 01/10/86 5 - 40 years
Tucson, AZ
Gladstell Forest ........ 148 1985 06/30/95 40 years
Conroe, TX
Harper's Ferry .......... 286 1972 02/25/92 5 - 40 years
Lafayette, LA
Heritage ................ 98 1966 05/14/90 5 - 40 years
Tulsa, OK
Mariners Pointe ......... 866 1972 06/28/91 5 - 40 years
St. Petersburg, FL
Sandstone ............... 41 1986 10/01/97 40 years
Mesa, AZ
Shadow Run .............. 3,001 1985 04/10/95 5 - 40 years
Pinellas Park, FL
South Cochran ........... 356 1928 05/29/91 40 years
Los Angeles, CA
Southgate ............... 87 1976 08/30/96 5 - 40 years
Odessa, TX
Spa Cove ................ 4,277 1965 02/27/87 5 - 40 years
Annapolis, MD
Summerfield ............. 420 1971 11/02/94 5 - 40 years
Orlando, FL
Summerstone ............. 478 1984 12/17/93 5 - 40 years
Houston, TX
Sunchase ................ 20 1981 10/08/97 5 - 40 years
Odessa, TX
Terrace Hills ........... 110 1985 03/05/97 5 - 40 years
El Paso, TX
Timbers ................. 4 1973 12/30/97 40 years
Tyler, TX
Treehouse ............... 53 1974 05/01/97 5 - 40 years
Irving, TX
Villas at Countryside ... 91 1985 05/15/97 5 - 40 years
Sterling, VA
Villa Piedra ............ 8 1991 12/22/97 40 years
Los Angeles, CA
Westgate of Laurel ...... 3,532 1969 01/01/95 5 - 40 years
Laurel, MD
Westwood ................ 27 1977 08/30/96 5 - 40 years
Odessa, TX
Woodland Hills .......... 126 1972 05/01/92 40 years
San Antonio, TX
</TABLE>
64
<PAGE> 65
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC. SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost
Capitalized Subsequent Gross Amounts of Which Carried
Initial Cost to Acquisition at End of Year
--------------------- ------------------- ------------------------------
Buildings & Buildings & (1)
Property/Location Encumbrances Land Improvements Improvements Other Land Improvements Total
- -------------------- ------------ ----- ------------ ------------ ----- ------- ------------ --------
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - CONTINUED (dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
APARTMENTS - CONTINUED
Woods Edge .............. $ 6,158 $ 1,015 $ 7,812 $ 143 $ -- $ 1,466 $ 7,504 $ 8,970
Rockville, MD
OFFICE BUILDINGS
74 New Montgomery ....... 6,256 2,277 9,105 3,829 (336)(2) 2,210 12,665 14,875
San Francisco, CA
Bonita Plaza ............ 3,995 1,168 4,670 -- -- 1,168 4,670 5,838
Bonita, CA
Chesapeake Ridge ........ 5,348 3,663 4,098 1,571 -- 3,681 5,651 9,332
San Diego, CA
Corporate Pointe ........ 4,020 830 3,321 351 -- 830 3,672 4,502
Chantilly, VA
Forum ................... 5,525 1,360 5,439 589 -- 1,360 6,028 7,388
Richmond, VA
Hartford ................ 2,236 630 2,520 400 -- 630 2,920 3,550
Dallas, TX
Institute Place Lofts ... 6,058 665 7,057 155 -- 665 7,212 7,877
Chicago, IL
Lexington Center ........ 4,000 1,103 4,413 -- -- 1,103 4,413 5,516
Colorado Springs, CO
One Steeplechase ........ 8,213 1,380 5,520 2,807 72 (4) 1,391 8,388 9,779
Sterling, VA
Plaza Towers ............ 4,774 1,760 12,617 6,573 (4,379)(2) 1,246 15,325 16,571
St. Petersburg, FL
Savings of America ...... 1,285 338 1,353 169 -- 338 1,522 1,860
Houston, TX
Town & Country .......... -- 108 432 470 -- 108 902 1,010
Houston, TX
Venture Center .......... 1,132 411 2,746 182 -- 411 2,928 3,339
Atlanta, GA
Waterstreet ............. 8,114 2,605 10,420 927 -- 2,605 11,347 13,952
Boulder, CO
INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSES
Corporate Center ........ 7,000 1,259 5,038 1,096 -- 1,264 6,129 7,393
Ashburn, VA
Denton Drive ............ 341 414 527 -- -- 414 527 941
Dallas, TX ...........
Encon ................... 3,500 984 3,935 -- -- 984 3,935 4,919
Fort Worth, TX
Parke Long .............. 7,759 1,838 7,361 748 -- 1,838 8,109 9,947
Chantilly, VA
Technology Trading ...... 4,158 1,199 4,796 96 -- 1,222 4,869 6,091
Sterling, VA
Texstar ................. 1,150 333 1,331 141 -- 333 1,472 1,805
Arlington, TX
Tricon .................. 4,848 2,761 6,442 796 -- 2,774 7,225 9,999
Atlanta, GA ..........
SHOPPING CENTERS
Dunes Plaza ............. 3,856 1,230 5,430 1,172 (82)(5) 1,529 6,221 7,750
Michigan City, IN
Northtown ............... 2,500 1,786 7,143 1,484 -- 2,103 8,310 10,413
Dallas, TX
Life on Which
Date Depreciation
of in Latest
Con- Statement
Accumulated struc- Date of Operation
Property/Location Depreciation tion Acquired is Computed
- -------------------- ------------ ------ -------- -----------
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - CONTINUED (dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
APARTMENTS - CONTINUED
Woods Edge .............. $ 3,296 1965 01/01/95 5 - 40 years
Rockville, MD
OFFICE BUILDINGS
74 New Montgomery ....... 3,982 1914 09/21/90 4 - 40 years
San Francisco, CA
Bonita Plaza ............ 39 1991 09/16/97 40 years
Bonita, CA
Chesapeake Ridge ........ 3,041 1985 06/30/85 5 - 40 years
San Diego, CA
Corporate Pointe ........ 450 1992 10/28/94 5 - 40 years
Chantilly, VA
Forum ................... 1,041 1987 10/30/92 3 - 40 years
Richmond, VA
Hartford ................ 286 1980 11/10/94 4 - 40 years
Dallas, TX
Institute Place Lofts ... 3,350 1910 01/01/93 2 - 40 years
Chicago, IL
Lexington Center ........ 9 1986 12/30/97 40 years
Colorado Springs, CO
One Steeplechase ........ 1,924 1987 12/22/92 5 - 40 years
Sterling, VA
Plaza Towers ............ 8,310 1979 11/14/85 3 - 40 years
St. Petersburg, FL
Savings of America ...... 37 1979 03/31/97 5 - 40 years
Houston, TX
Town & Country .......... 395 1982 05/01/92 3 - 40 years
Houston, TX
Venture Center .......... 676 1981 07/04/89 3 - 40 years
Atlanta, GA
Waterstreet ............. 2,341 1988 09/30/91 3 - 40 years
Boulder, CO
INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSES
Corporate Center ........ 811 1989 04/28/94 3 - 40 years
Ashburn, VA
Denton Drive ............ 61 1948- 05/13/93 40 years
Dallas, TX ........... 1952
Encon ................... 25 1958 10/01/97 40 years
Fort Worth, TX
Parke Long .............. 863 1989 06/16/94 3 - 40 years
Chantilly, VA
Technology Trading ...... 530 1987 12/21/93 3 - 40 years
Sterling, VA
Texstar ................. 138 1967 12/16/93 5 - 40 years
Arlington, TX
Tricon .................. 1,268 1971- 02/11/93 3 - 40 years
Atlanta, GA .......... 1975
SHOPPING CENTERS
Dunes Plaza ............. 1,147 1978 03/17/92 5 - 40 years
Michigan City, IN
Northtown ............... 1,402 1967 02/25/92 5 - 40 years
Dallas, TX
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE> 66
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC. SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cost
Capitalized Subsequent
Initial Cost to Acquisition
------------------------ -------------------------
Buildings &
Property/Location Encumbrances Land Improvements Improvements Other
- -------------------- ------------ ------- ------------ ----------- ---------
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - CONTINUED (dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SHOPPING CENTERS - CONTINUED
Parkway Center ............ $ 1,796 $ 273 $ 1,876 $ 405 $ --
Dallas, TX
Sadler Square ............. 2,415 679 2,715 65 --
Amelia Island, FL
Sheboygan ................. 864 242 1,371 17 --
Sheboygan, WI
HOTEL
Majestic Inn .............. 5,700 1,139 4,555 808 --
San Francisco, CA
LAND
Las Colinas ............... -- 995 -- 5 --
Las Colinas, TX
West End .................. 8,784 11,405 -- -- --
Dallas, TX
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES ..... 215,680 67,050 231,489 33,911 (6,718)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
PROPERTIES HELD FOR SALE
SHOPPING CENTERS
Shaw Plaza ................ 2,579 1,066 4,262 1,098 (1,446)(6)
Sharon, MA
LAND
Fiesta .................... -- 44 -- -- --
San Angelo, TX
Fruitland ................. -- 253 -- -- (100)(7)
Fruitland Park, FL
Moss Creek ................ -- 85 -- -- --
Greensboro, NC
Republic Tower ............ -- 1,074 -- -- --
Dallas, TX
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
PROPERTIES HELD FOR
SALE ................... 2,579 2,522 4,262 1,098 (1,546)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 218,259 $ 69,572 $ 235,751 $ 35,009 $ (8,264)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Life on Which
Gross Amounts of Which Carried Date Depreciation
at End of Year of in Latest
------------------------ Con- Statement
Buildings & (1) Accumulated struc- Date of Operation
Property/Location Land Improvements Total Depreciation tion Acquired is Computed
- -------------------- ------- ------------ -------- ------------ ------ -------- ------------
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - CONTINUED (dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SHOPPING CENTERS - CONTINUED
Parkway Center ............ $ 273 $ 2,281 $ 2,554 $ 701 1979 11/01/91 1 - 40 years
Dallas, TX
Sadler Square ............. 679 2,780 3,459 347 1987 11/22/93 3 - 40 years
Amelia Island, FL
Sheboygan ................. 259 1,371 1,630 191 1977 05/21/92 40 years
Sheboygan, WI
HOTEL
Majestic Inn .............. 1,139 5,363 6,502 1,026 1902 12/31/90 2 - 40 years
San Francisco, CA
LAND
Las Colinas ............... 1,000 -- 1,000 -- -- 01/25/96 --
Las Colinas, TX
West End .................. 11,405 -- 11,405 -- -- 08/05/97 --
Dallas, TX
--------- --------- --------- ---------
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES ..... 68,608 257,124 325,732 55,487
--------- --------- --------- ---------
PROPERTIES HELD FOR SALE
SHOPPING CENTERS
Shaw Plaza ................ 813 4,167 4,980 1,350 1978 12/13/91 5 - 40 years
Sharon, MA
LAND
Fiesta .................... 44 -- 44 -- -- 12/31/91 --
San Angelo, TX
Fruitland ................. 153 -- 153 -- -- 05/01/92 --
Fruitland Park, FL
Moss Creek ................ 85 -- 85 -- -- 12/31/96 --
Greensboro, NC
Republic Tower ............ 1,074 -- 1,074 -- -- 11/27/92 --
Dallas, TX
--------- --------- --------- ---------
PROPERTIES HELD FOR
SALE ................... 2,169 4,167 6,336 1,350
--------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 70,777 $ 261,291 $ 332,068 $ 56,837
========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
- ------------------
(1) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $338.0 million.
(2) Writedown of property to estimated net realizable value.
(3) Escrow deposits deducted from the basis of the property.
(4) Construction period interest and taxes.
(5) Cash received deducted from the basis of the property, offset by land
acquired in 1992.
(6) Adjustment to purchase price and 1997 writedown of property to estimated
net realizable value.
(7) Cash received for easement deducted from the basis of the property.
66
<PAGE> 67
SCHEDULE III
(Continued)
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------- --------- ---------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Reconciliation of Real Estate
Balance at January 1, ................................................ $ 270,795 $ 270,296 $ 253,367
Additions
Acquisitions and improvements ..................................... 79,483 11,097 38,664
Foreclosures ...................................................... -- 691 2,519
Deductions
Sale of real estate ............................................... (15,860) (7,121) (24,229)
Sale of foreclosed properties ..................................... (691) (2,589) --
Writedown due to permanent
impairment of property ......................................... (1,337) (1,579) --
Other ............................................................. (322) -- (25)
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, .............................................. $ 332,068 $ 270,795 $ 270,296
========= ========= =========
Reconciliation of Accumulated
Depreciation
Balance at January 1, ................................................ $ 50,386 $ 44,172 $ 31,549
Additions
Depreciation ...................................................... 9,578 8,461 8,619
Accumulated depreciation of
partnership properties
acquired through assumption
of debt ........................................................ -- -- 7,794
Deductions
Sale of real estate ............................................... (387) (1,718) (3,790)
Sale of foreclosed properties ..................................... (2,740) (529) --
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, .............................................. $ 56,837 $ 50,386 $ 44,172
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
67
<PAGE> 68
SCHEDULE IV
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Final
Interest Maturity
Description Rate Date Periodic Payment Terms
- ------------------------ -------- -------- ----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
FIRST MORTGAGE LOANS
MILWAUKEE LAND.............. Varies 01/91 Note receivable bearing interest at
Secured by 34,847 sq. ft. of prime plus 1%. Monthly interest only
land in Milwaukee, WI. payments due until maturity, at which
time all principal and unpaid interest
was due. No prepayment penalty.
MAUMELLE LAND............... 9.0% 01/96 Note receivable bearing interest at
Secured by 36.3 acres of 9%. Principal and interest due at
commercial land in maturity.
Maumelle, AR
MOSS CREEK LOTS............. 9.0% 06/2000 7 notes outstanding at 12/31/97.
Secured by developed resi- -12.0% Monthly payments of principal and
dential lots in Greensboro, interest ranging from $118 to $421.
NC.
WRAPAROUND MORTGAGE LOANS
CHATEAU CHARLES............. 3.875% 02/2016 Note receivable bearing interest at
Secured by a hotel 3.85%. Principal and interest pay-
in Lake Charles, LA. ments of $13,327 due monthly. Pre-
payment penalty of 1% of outstanding
principal balance.
K-MART, CARY................ Varies 03/2012 Note receivable bearing interest at
Secured by a shopping center prime plus 1%. Monthly payments of
in Wake County, NC. lesser of $37,277 or net cash flow of
the collateral property.
JUNIOR MORTGAGE LOANS
HAMPTON..................... Varies - Note receivable bearing interest at
Secured by two office prime plus 1%. Monthly payments of
buildings in Milwaukee, WI interest only required. Principal
is due upon demand. No prepayment
penalty.
LINCOLN COURT APARTMENTS.... Varies 06/2004 Two notes receivable bearing interest
Secured by apartment at prime plus 1%. Interest only pay-
building in ments due monthly until maturity, at
Dallas, TX. which time all principal and unpaid
interest are due. No prepayment
penalty.
<CAPTION>
Principal Amount of
Carrying Loans Subject to
Prior Face Amount Amounts Delinquent Principal
Description Liens of Mortgage of Mortgage (1) or Interest
- ------------------------ -------- ----------- --------------- ------------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FIRST MORTGAGE LOANS
MILWAUKEE LAND ............. $ -- $ 200 $ 60 $ 60(2)
Secured by 34,847 sq. ft. of
land in Milwaukee, WI
MAUMELLE LAND .............. -- 1,400 -- 1,400
Secured by 36.3 acres of
commercial land in
Maumelle, AR
MOSS CREEK LOTS ............ -- 180 124 53
Secured by developed resi-
dential lots in Greensboro,
NC
WRAPAROUND MORTGAGE LOANS
CHATEAU CHARLES ............ 120 3,000 254 --
Secured by a hotel
in Lake Charles, LA
K-MART, CARY ............... 2,059 3,400 2,514 --
Secured by a shopping center
in Wake County, NC
JUNIOR MORTGAGE LOANS
HAMPTON .................... -- 400 92 92(2)
Secured by two office
buildings in Milwaukee, WI
LINCOLN COURT APARTMENTS ... 1,346 1,369 1,369 --
Secured by apartment
building in
Dallas, TX
------- ------ ------ ------
3,525 9,949 4,413 1,605
</TABLE>
68
<PAGE> 69
SCHEDULE IV
(Continued)
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Final
Interest Maturity
Description Rate Date Periodic Payment Terms
- ------------------------ -------- -------- ----------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SECURED BY OTHER THAN
REAL ESTATE
CRIVELLO #2................. Varies On Demand Note receivable bearing interest at
Secured by a mortgage prime. Monthly payment of interest
note secured by real only.
property in Milwaukee, WI.
DENOTO...................... 10.0% 11/97 Note receivable bearing interest at
Secured by a general busi- 10%. Monthly payments of principal
ness security agreement. and interest. No prepayment penalty.
DOUBLE FEATURE VIDEO........ Varies 07/98 Three notes outstanding. Quarterly
Secured by a general payments due based on gross sales.
business security Unpaid accruals compounded to principal.
agreement.
HOPPER...................... 12.5% 11/95 Principal and interest payments of $480
Secured by a general due monthly. No prepayment penalty.
business security agreement.
Total
Interest...................
Unamortized discount.......
Allowance for estimated
losses...................
<CAPTION>
Principal Amount of
Carrying Loans Subject to
Prior Face Amount Amounts Delinquent Principal
Description Liens of Mortgage of Mortgage (1) or Interest
- ------------------------ -------- ----------- --------------- --------------------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SECURED BY OTHER THAN
REAL ESTATE
CRIVELLO #2 ................... -- 879 193 193(2)
Secured by a mortgage
note secured by real
property in Milwaukee, WI.
DENOTO ........................ -- 7 7 7
Secured by a general busi-
ness security agreement.
DOUBLE FEATURE VIDEO .......... -- 645 181 181(2)
Secured by a general
business security
agreement.
HOPPER ........................ -- 44 44 44(2)
Secured by a general
business security agreement.
------- ------- ------- -------
Total $ 3,525 $11,524 4,838 $ 2,030
======= ======= =======
Interest ...................... 3
Unamortized discount .......... (3)
-------
4,838
Allowance for estimated
losses ...................... (891)
-------
$ 3,947
=======
</TABLE>
(1) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $4.8 million.
(2) An allowance for loss has been provided to reduce the carrying value of
this loan to the Company's estimate of fair value of the underlying
collateral minus estimated selling expenses.
69
<PAGE> 70
SCHEDULE IV
(Continued)
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
(dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, ................................................ $ 9,485 $ 11,166 $ 18,418
Additions
Deferred interest ................................................. -- -- 4
Deductions
Collections of principal .......................................... (5,028) (885) (2,739)
Foreclosed properties and
deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure ................................... -- (683) --
Write off of uncollectible
mortgage loan .................................................. -- (63) (181)
Write off of principal against
deferred gain due to pay off
of mortgage loans at a
discount ....................................................... -- -- (4,244)
Write off of principal due to
discount for early payoff ...................................... (135) (50) --
Write off of unamortized discount
due to early payoff............................................. 513 -- --
Transfer of mortgage loan to
unsecured status ............................................... -- -- (92)
-------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, .............................................. $ 4,835 $ 9,485 $ 11,166
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
70
<PAGE> 71
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
-------------------------------
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
Directors
The affairs of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (the "Company" or the
"Registrant") are managed by a Board of Directors. The Directors are elected at
the annual meeting of stockholders or appointed by the incumbent Board of
Directors and serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until a
successor has been elected or approved.
The Directors of the Company are listed below, together with their ages, terms
of service, all positions and offices with the Company or its advisor, Basic
Capital Management, Inc. ("BCM" or the "Advisor"), their principal occupations,
business experience and directorships with other companies during the last five
years or more. The designation "Affiliated", when used below with respect to a
Director, means that the Director is an officer, director or employee of the
Advisor or an officer of the Company. The designation "Independent", when used
below with respect to a Director, means that the Director is neither an officer
of the Company nor a director, officer or employee of the Advisor, although the
Company may have certain business or professional relationships with such
Director as discussed in ITEM 13. "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS - Certain Business Relationships."
TED P. STOKELY: Age 64, Director (Independent) (since April 1990) and Chairman
of the Board (since January 1995).
General Manager (since January 1995) of ECF Senior Housing Corporation, a
nonprofit corporation; General Manager (since January 1993) of Housing
Assistance Foundation, Inc., a nonprofit corporation; Part-time unpaid
Consultant (since January 1993) and paid Consultant (April 1992 to December
1992) of Eldercare Housing Foundation ("Eldercare"), a nonprofit corporation;
President (April 1992 to April 1994) of PSA Group; Executive Vice President
(1987 to 1991) of Key Companies Inc.; Trustee (since April 1990) and Chairman
of the Board (since January 1995) of Continental Mortgage and Equity Trust
("CMET"); Director (since April 1990) and Chairman of the Board (since January
1995) of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. ("IORI"); and Trustee (April
1990 to August 1994) of National Income Realty Trust ("NIRT").
71
<PAGE> 72
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
Directors (Continued)
RICHARD W. DOUGLAS: Age 50, Director (Independent) (since January 1998).
President (since 1991) of Dallas Chamber of Commerce; President (1988 to 1991)
of North Texas Commission; President (1978 to 1981) of Las Colinas Corporation
and Southland Investment Properties, both affiliates of Southland Financial
Corporation; Trustee (since January 1998) of CMET; and Director (since January
1998) of IORI.
LARRY E. HARLEY: Age 57, Director (Independent) (since January 1998).
President (1993 to 1997) and Executive Vice President (1992 to 1993) of U.S.
Operations, Executive Vice President (1989 to 1992) and Senior Vice President
(1986 to 1989) of Distribution Operations, Director of Marketing (1984 to
1986), and Manager of North Central Distribution Center (1974 to 1984) of Mary
Kay Cosmetics; Trustee (since January 1998) of CMET; and Director (since
January 1998) of IORI.
R. DOUGLAS LEONHARD: Age 61, Director (Independent) (since January 1998).
Senior Vice President (1986 to 1997) of LaCantera Development Company, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of USAA; Senior Vice President (1980 to 1985) of
The Woodlands Development Corporation; Vice President and Houston Projects
Manager (1973 to 1979) of Friendswood Development Company; Manager in various
capacities (1960 to 1973) of Exxon Corp; Trustee (since January 1998) of CMET;
and Director (since January 1998) of IORI.
MURRAY SHAW: Age 66, Director (Independent) (since February 1998).
Chairman of the Board of Regents (since 1997) of Stephen F. Austin University;
Vice President (1967 to 1996) of Tracor, Inc.; Trustee (since February 1998) of
CMET; and Director (since February 1998) of IORI.
MARTIN L. WHITE: Age 58, Director (Independent) (since January 1995).
Chief Executive Officer (since 1995) of Builders Emporium, Inc.; Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer (since 1993) of North American Trading Company Ltd.;
President and Chief Operating Officer (since 1992) of Community Based
Developers, Inc.; Development Officer and Loan Manager (1986 to 1992) of the
City of San Jose, California; Vice President and Director of Programs (1967 to
1986) of Arpact, Inc., a government contractor for small business development
and trade; Trustee (since January 1995) of CMET; and Director (since January
1995) of IORI.
72
<PAGE> 73
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
Directors (Continued)
EDWARD G. ZAMPA: Age 63, Director (Independent) (since January 1995).
General Partner (since 1976) of Edward G. Zampa and Company; and Trustee (since
January 1995) of CMET; and Director (since January 1995) of IORI.
Board Committees
The Company's Board of Directors held nine meetings during 1997. For such year,
no incumbent Director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total
number of meetings held by the Company's Board of Directors during the period
for which he had been a Director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by
all committees of the Board of Directors on which he served during the period
that he served, except for Mr. White who attended only of the two meetings of
the Audit Committee.
The Company's Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, the function of which
is to review the Company's operating and accounting procedures. The current
members of the Audit Committee, all of whom are Independent Directors, are
Messrs. Stokely, Leonhard and White. The Audit Committee met twice during 1997.
The Company's Board of Directors has a Relationship with Advisor Committee and a
Board Development Committee. The current members of the Relationship with
Advisor Committee are Messrs. Stokely and Zampa. The Relationship with Advisor
Committee reviews and reports to the Company's Board of Directors on the
services provided to the Company by the Advisor and its affiliates and the terms
of any engagement or compensation of the Advisor or its affiliates. The
Relationship with Advisor Committee did not meet in 1997. The Board Development
Committee reviews and reports to the Company's Board of Directors on the
membership, compensation and functions of the Board of Directors. The current
member of the Board Development Committee is Mr. White. The Board Development
Committee did not meet in 1997.
The Company's Board of Directors does not have Nominating or Compensation
Committees.
Executive Officers
The following persons currently serve as executive officers of the Company:
Randall M. Paulson, President; Karl L. Blaha, Executive Vice President -
Commercial Asset Management; Bruce A. Endendyk, Executive Vice President; and
Thomas A. Holland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Their
positions with the Company are not subject to a vote of stockholders. Their
ages, terms of service, all positions and offices with the Company or BCM, other
principal occupations, business experience and directorships with other
companies during the last five years or more are set forth below.
73
<PAGE> 74
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
Executive Officers (Continued)
RANDALL M. PAULSON: Age 51, President (since August 1995)and Executive Vice
President (January 1995 to August 1995).
President (since August 1995) and Executive Vice President (January 1995 to
August 1995) of CMET, IORI and Syntek Asset Management, Inc. ("SAMI"), the
managing general partner of Syntek Asset Management, L.P. ("SAMLP"), which is
the general partner of National Realty, L.P. ("NRLP") and National Operating,
L.P. ("NOLP") and (October 1994 to August 1995) of BCM; Director (since August
1995) of SAMI; Executive Vice President (since January 1995) of American Realty
Trust, Inc. ("ART"); Vice President (1993 to 1994) of GSSW, LP, a joint venture
of Great Southern Life and Southwestern Life; Vice President (1990 to 1993) of
Property Company of America Realty, Inc.; President (1990) of Paulson Realty
Group; President (1983 to 1989) of Johnstown Management Company; and Vice
President (1979 to 1982) of Lexton-Ancira.
KARL L. BLAHA: Age 50, Executive Vice President - Commercial Asset Management
(since July 1997).
Executive Vice President- Commercial Asset Management (since July 1997),
Executive Vice President and Director of Commercial Management (April 1992 to
August 1995) of BCM, CMET, IORI, and SAMI; Director (since June 1996),
President (since October 1993) and Executive Vice President and Director of
Commercial Management (April 1992 to October 1993) of ART; Executive Vice
President (October 1992 to July 1997) of Carmel Realty, Inc. ("Carmel Realty"),
a company owned by First Equity Properties, Inc. ("First Equity"), which is 50%
owned by BCM; Director and President (since 1996) of First Equity; Executive
Vice President and Director of Commercial Management (April 1992 to February
1994) of NIRT and Vinland Property Trust ("VPT"); Partner - Director of
National Real Estate Operations of First Winthrop Corporation (August 1988 to
March 1992); Corporate Vice President of Southmark Corporation ("Southmark")
(April 1984 to August 1988); and President of Southmark Commercial Management
(March 1986 to August 1988).
BRUCE A. ENDENDYK: Age 49, Executive Vice President (since January 1995).
President (since January 1995) of Carmel Realty; Executive Vice President
(since January 1995) of BCM, SAMI, ART, CMET and IORI; Management Consultant
(November 1990 to December 1994); Executive Vice President (January 1989 to
November 1990) of Southmark; President and Chief Executive Officer (March 1988
to January 1989) of Southmark Equities Corporation; and Vice President/Resident
Manager (December 1975 to March 1988) of Coldwell Banker Commercial/Real Estate
Services in Houston, Texas.
74
<PAGE> 75
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
Executive Officers (Continued)
THOMAS A. HOLLAND: Age 55, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(since August 1995); Secretary (since February 1997); and Senior Vice President
and Chief Accounting Officer (June 1990 to August 1995).
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since August 1995) and
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (July 1990 to August 1995)
of BCM, SAMI, ART, CMET and IORI; Secretary (since February 1997) of CMET and
IORI; Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (July 1990 to February
1994) of NIRT and VPT; Vice President and Controller (December 1986 to June
1990) of Southmark; Vice President-Finance (January 1986 to December 1986) of
Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company; Assistant Controller (May 1976 to January
1986) of Maxus Energy Corporation (formerly Diamond Shamrock Corporation);
Trustee (August 1989 to June 1990) of Arlington Realty Investors; and Certified
Public Accountant (since 1970).
Officers
Although not executive officers of the Company, the following persons currently
serve as officers of the Company: Robert A. Waldman, Senior Vice President and
General Counsel; and Drew D. Potera, Vice President and Treasurer. Their
positions with the Company are not subject to a vote of stockholders. Their
ages, terms of service, all positions and offices with the Company or BCM, other
principal occupations, business experience and directorships with other
companies during the last five years or more are set forth below.
ROBERT A. WALDMAN: Age 45, Senior Vice President and General Counsel (since
January 1995), Vice President (December 1990 to January 1995) and Secretary
(December 1993 to February 1997).
Senior Vice President and General Counsel (since January 1995), Vice President
(December 1990 to January 1995) and Secretary (December 1993 to February 1997)
of CMET and IORI; Senior Vice President and General Counsel (since January
1995), Vice President (January 1993 to January 1995) and Secretary (since
December 1989) of ART; Senior Vice President and General Counsel (since
November 1994), Vice President and Corporate Counsel (November 1989 to November
1994), and Secretary (since November 1989) of BCM; Senior Vice President and
General Counsel (since January 1995), Vice President (April 1990 to January
1995) and Secretary (since December 1990) of SAMI; Vice President (December
1990 to February 1994) and Secretary (December 1993 to February 1994) of NIRT
and VPT; and Director (February 1987 to October 1989) and General Counsel and
Secretary (1985 to October 1989) of Red Eagle Resources Corporation.
75
<PAGE> 76
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
Officers (Continued)
DREW D. POTERA: Age 38, Vice President (since December 1996) and Treasurer
(since December 1990).
Vice President (since December 1996) and Treasurer (since December 1990) of
CMET and IORI; Treasurer (since August 1991) and Assistant Treasurer (December
1990 to August 1991) of ART; Vice President, Treasurer and Securities Manager
(since July 1990) of BCM; Vice President and Treasurer (since February 1992) of
SAMI; Treasurer (December 1990 to February 1994) of NIRT and VPT; and Financial
Consultant with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (June 1985
to June 1990).
In addition to the foregoing officers, the Company has several vice presidents
and assistant secretaries who are not listed herein.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Under the securities laws of the United States, the Company's Directors,
executive officers, and any persons holding more than ten percent of the
Company's shares of Common Stock are required to report their ownership of the
Company's shares and any changes in that ownership to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Specific due dates for these reports
have been established and the Company is required to report any failure to file
by these dates during 1997. All of these filing requirements were satisfied by
the Company's Directors and executive officers and ten percent holders. In
making these statements, the Company has relied on the written representations
of its incumbent Directors and executive officers and its ten percent holders
and copies of the reports that they have filed with the Commission.
The Advisor
Although the Company's Board of Directors is directly responsible for managing
the affairs of the Company and for setting the policies which guide it, the
day-to-day operations of the Company are performed by a contractual advisor
under the supervision of the Company's Board of Directors. The duties of the
advisor include, among other things, locating, investigating, evaluating and
recommending real estate and mortgage note investment and sales opportunities as
well as financing and refinancing sources to the Company. The advisor also
serves as a consultant to the Company's Board of Directors in connection with
the business plan for the Company and investment policy decisions.
BCM has served as the Company's advisor since March 1989. BCM is a corporation
of which Messrs. Paulson, Blaha, Endendyk and Holland serve as executive
officers. BCM is a company owned by a trust for the benefit of the children of
Gene E. Phillips. Mr. Phillips served as a director of BCM until December 22,
1989, and as Chief Executive Officer of BCM until September 1, 1992. Mr.
Phillips serves as a representative
76
<PAGE> 77
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
The Advisor (Continued)
of his children's trust which owns BCM and, in such capacity, has substantial
contact with the management of BCM and input with respect to its performance of
advisory services to the Company.
At the Company's annual meeting of stockholders held on May 8, 1997, the
Company's stockholders approved the renewal of the Company's Advisory Agreement
with BCM through the next annual meeting of the Company's stockholders.
Subsequent renewals of the Advisory Agreement with BCM do not require the
approval of the Company's stockholders but do require the approval of the
Company's Board of Directors.
Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is required to formulate and submit
annually for approval by the Company's Board of Directors a budget and business
plan for the Company containing a twelve-month forecast of operations and cash
flow, a general plan for asset sales or acquisitions, lending, foreclosure and
borrowing activity, and other investments, and the Advisor is required to report
quarterly to the Company's Board of Directors on the Company's performance
against the business plan. In addition, all transactions or investments by the
Company shall require prior approval by the Company's Board of Directors unless
they are explicitly provided for in the approved business plan or are made
pursuant to authority expressly delegated to the Advisor by the Company's Board
of Directors.
The Advisory Agreement also requires prior approval of the Company's Board of
Directors for the retention of all consultants and third party professionals,
other than legal counsel. The Advisory Agreement provides that the Advisor shall
be deemed to be in a fiduciary relationship to the Company's stockholders;
contains a broad standard governing the Advisor's liability for losses by the
Company; and contains guidelines for the Advisor's allocation of investment
opportunities as among itself, the Company and other entities it advises.
The Advisory Agreement provides for BCM to be responsible for the day-to-day
operations of the Company and to receive an advisory fee comprised of a gross
asset fee of .0625% per month (.75% per annum) of the average of the gross asset
value of the Company (total assets less allowance for amortization, depreciation
or depletion and valuation reserves) and an annual net income fee equal to 7.5%
per annum of the Company's net income.
The Advisory Agreement also provides for BCM to receive an annual incentive
sales fee equal to 10% of the amount, if any, by which the aggregate sales
consideration for all real estate sold by the Company during such fiscal year
exceeds the sum of: (i) the cost of each such property as originally recorded in
the Company's books for tax purposes (without deduction for depreciation,
amortization or reserve for losses), (ii) capital improvements made to such
assets during the period owned by the Company, and (iii) all closing costs,
(including real estate commissions) incurred in the sale of such real estate;
provided,
77
<PAGE> 78
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
The Advisor (Continued)
however, no incentive fee shall be paid unless (a) such real estate sold in such
fiscal year, in the aggregate, has produced an 8% simple annual return on the
Company's net investment including capital improvements, calculated over the
Company's holding period before depreciation and inclusive of operating income
and sales consideration and (b) the aggregate net operating income from all real
estate owned by the Company for each of the prior and current fiscal years shall
be at least 5% higher in the current fiscal year than in the prior fiscal year.
Additionally, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement BCM or an affiliate of BCM is
to receive an acquisition commission for supervising the acquisition, purchase
or long-term lease of real estate for the Company equal to the lesser of (i) up
to 1% of the cost of acquisition, inclusive of commissions, if any, paid to
nonaffiliated brokers or (ii) the compensation customarily charged in
arm's-length transactions by others rendering similar property acquisition
services as an ongoing public activity in the same geographical location and for
comparable property, provided that the aggregate purchase price of each property
(including acquisition fees and real estate brokerage commissions) may not
exceed such property's appraised value at acquisition.
The Advisory Agreement requires BCM or any affiliate of BCM to pay to the
Company, one-half of any compensation received from third parties with respect
to the origination, placement or brokerage of any loan made by the Company;
provided, however, that the compensation retained by BCM or any affiliate of BCM
shall not exceed the lesser of (i) 2% of the amount of the loan committed by the
Company or (ii) a loan brokerage and commitment fee which is reasonable and fair
under the circumstances.
The Advisory Agreement also provides that BCM or an affiliate of BCM is to
receive a mortgage or loan acquisition fee with respect to the acquisition or
purchase of any existing mortgage loan by the Company equal to the lesser of (i)
1% of the amount of the loan purchased or (ii) a brokerage or commitment fee
which is reasonable and fair under the circumstances. Such fee will not be paid
in connection with the origination or funding by the Company of any mortgage
loan.
Under the Advisory Agreement, BCM or an affiliate of BCM is also to receive a
mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fee for obtaining loans to the Company
or refinancing on Company properties equal to the lesser of (i) 1% of the amount
of the loan or the amount refinanced or (ii) a brokerage or refinancing fee
which is reasonable and fair under the circumstances; provided, however, that no
such fee shall be paid on loans from BCM or an affiliate of BCM without the
approval of the Company's Board of Directors. No fee shall be paid on loan
extensions.
Under the Advisory Agreement, BCM is to receive reimbursement of certain
expenses incurred by it in the performance of advisory services to the Company.
78
<PAGE> 79
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
The Advisor (Continued)
Under the Advisory Agreement, all or a portion of the annual advisory fee must
be refunded by the Advisor to the Company if the Operating Expenses of the
Company (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) exceed certain limits specified
in the Advisory Agreement based on the book value, net asset value and net
income of the Company during such fiscal year. The effect of the limitation was
to require that BCM refund $206,000 of the annual advisory fee for 1997.
Additionally, if the Company were to request that BCM render services to the
Company other than those required by the Advisory Agreement, BCM or an affiliate
of BCM will be separately compensated for such additional services on terms to
be agreed upon from time to time. As discussed below, under "Property
Management", the Company has hired Carmel Realty Services, Ltd. ("Carmel,
Ltd."), an affiliate of BCM, to provide property management services for the
Company's properties. Also as discussed below, under "Real Estate Brokerage" the
Company has engaged, on a non-exclusive basis, Carmel Realty, also an affiliate
of BCM, to perform brokerage services for the Company.
BCM may only assign the Advisory Agreement with the prior consent of the
Company.
The directors and principal officers of BCM are set forth below.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MICKEY N. PHILLIPS: Director
RYAN T. PHILLIPS: Director
RANDALL M. PAULSON: President
KARL L. BLAHA: Executive Vice President - Commercial Asset
Management
BRUCE A. ENDENDYK: Executive Vice President
THOMAS A. HOLLAND: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
A. CAL ROSSI, JR.: Executive Vice President
COOPER B. STUART: Executive Vice President
CLIFFORD C. TOWNS, JR.: Executive Vice President - Finance
DAN S. ALLRED: Senior Vice President - Land Division
ROBERT A. WALDMAN: Senior Vice President, Secretary and General
Counsel
DREW D. POTERA: Vice President, Treasurer and Securities
Manager
</TABLE>
79
<PAGE> 80
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT
(Continued)
The Advisor (Continued)
Mickey N. Phillips is Gene E. Phillips' brother and Ryan T. Phillips is Gene E.
Phillips' son. Gene E. Phillips serves as a representative of the trust
established for the benefit of his children which owns BCM and, in such
capacity, has substantial contact with the management of BCM and input with
respect to BCM's performance of advisory services to the Company.
Property Management
Since February 1, 1990, affiliates of BCM have provided property management
services to the Company. Currently, Carmel, Ltd. provides such property
management services for a fee of 5% or less of the monthly gross rents collected
on the properties under its management. Carmel, Ltd. subcontracts with other
entities for the provision of the property-level management services to the
Company at various rates. The general partner of Carmel, Ltd. is BCM. The
limited partners of Carmel, Ltd. are (i) First Equity, (ii) Gene E. Phillips and
(iii) a trust for the benefit of the children of Mr. Phillips. Carmel, Ltd.
subcontracts the property-level management and leasing of 26 of the Company's
commercial properties and its hotel and the commercial properties owned by a
real estate partnership in which the Company and IORI are partners to Carmel
Realty, which is a company owned by First Equity. Carmel Realty is entitled to
receive property and construction management fees and leasing commissions in
accordance with the terms of its property-level management agreement with
Carmel, Ltd.
Real Estate Brokerage
Since December 1, 1992, Carmel Realty has been engaged, on a non-exclusive
basis, to provide brokerage services for the Company. Carmel Realty is entitled
to receive a real estate commission for property acquisitions and sales by the
Company in accordance with the following sliding scale of total fees to be paid
by the Company: (i) maximum fee of 5% on the first $2.0 million of any purchase
or sale transaction of which no more than 4% would be paid to Carmel Realty or
affiliates; (ii) maximum fee of 4% on transaction amounts between $2.0 million -
$5.0 million of which no more than 3% would be paid to Carmel Realty or
affiliates; (iii) maximum fee of 3% on transaction amounts between $5.0 million
- - $10.0 million of which no more than 2% would be paid to Carmel Realty or
affiliates; and (iv) maximum fee of 2% on transaction amounts in excess of $10.0
million of which no more than 1.5% would be paid to Carmel Realty or affiliates.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Company has no employees, payroll or benefit plans and pays no compensation
to the executive officers of the Company. The executive officers of the Company,
who are also officers or employees of BCM, the Company's Advisor, are
compensated by the Advisor. Such executive officers of the Company perform a
variety of services for the Advisor
80
<PAGE> 81
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Continued)
and the amount of their compensation is determined solely by the Advisor. BCM
does not allocate the cash compensation of its officers among the various
entities for which it serves as advisor. See ITEM 10. "DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS AND ADVISOR OF THE REGISTRANT - The Advisor" for a more detailed
discussion of the compensation payable to BCM by the Company.
The only remuneration paid by the Company is to the Directors who are not
officers or directors of BCM or its affiliated companies. The Independent
Directors (i) review the investment policies of the Company to determine that
they are in the best interest of the Company's stockholders, (ii) review the
Company's contract with the advisor, (iii) supervise the performance of the
Company's advisor and review the reasonableness of the compensation which the
Company pays to its advisor in terms of the nature and quality of services
performed, (iv) review the reasonableness of the total fees and expenses of the
Company and (v) select, when necessary, a qualified independent real estate
appraiser to appraise properties purchased by the Company.
Each Independent Director receives compensation in the amount of $15,000 per
year, plus reimbursement for expenses and the Chairman of the Board receives an
additional $1,500 per year for serving in such position. In addition, each
Independent Director receives an additional fee of $1,000 per day for any
special services rendered by him to the Company outside of his ordinary duties
as Director, plus reimbursement of expenses.
During 1997, $78,250 was paid to the Independent Directors in total Directors'
fees for all services, including the annual fee for service during the period
January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997, and 1997 special service fees as
follows: Ted P. Stokely, $16,500; Edward L. Tixier, $15,000; Martin L. White,
$15,000; and Edward G. Zampa, $31,750.
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
81
<PAGE> 82
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Continued)
Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return
on the Company's shares of Common Stock with the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock
Index ("S&P 500 Index") and the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts, Inc. Hybrid REIT Total Return Index ("REIT Index"). The comparison
assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 1992 in the Company's shares of
Common Stock and in each of the indices and further assumes the reinvestment of
all distributions. Past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future
performance.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
=============================================================================================================================
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
THE COMPANY 100.00 200.00 220.38 223.78 252.97 377.65
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P 500 INDEX 100.00 109.99 111.43 153.13 188.29 251.13
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REIT INDEX 100.00 121.18 126.03 155.01 200.51 222.07
=============================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
82
<PAGE> 83
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners. The following table sets forth
the ownership of the Company's Common Stock, both beneficially and of record,
both individually and in the aggregate, for those persons or entities known by
the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of its shares of Common
Stock as of the close of business on March 6, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount and Nature
Name and Address of of Beneficial Percent of
Beneficial Owner Ownership Class (1)
- --------------------------- ----------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
American Realty Trust, Inc. 1,193,768 30.6%
10670 N. Central Expressway
Suite 300
Dallas, Texas 75231
Basic Capital Management, Inc. 459,512 11.8%
10670 N. Central Expressway
Suite 300
Dallas, Texas 75231
Maurice A. Halperin 288,450 7.4%
2500 North Military Trail
Suite 225
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
</TABLE>
- ----------------------------
(1) Percentage is based upon 3,899,200 shares of Common Stock outstanding at
March 6, 1998.
Security Ownership of Management. The following table sets forth the ownership
of the Company's Common Stock, both beneficially and of record, both
individually and in the aggregate, for the Directors and executive officers of
the Company as of the close of business on March 6, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amount and Nature
of Beneficial Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner Ownership Class (1)
- -------------------------- ----------------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
All Directors and Executive 1,760,255(2)(3) 45.1%
Officers as a group
(11 individuals)
</TABLE>
- --------------------------
(1) Percentage is based upon 3,889,200 shares of Common Stock outstanding at
March 6, 1998.
(2) Includes 79,500 shares owned by CMET of which the Company's Directors may
be deemed to be beneficial owners by virtue of their positions as trustees
of CMET. The Directors of the Company disclaim beneficial ownership of
such shares. Also includes 1,000 shares owned directly by Ted P. Stokely.
(3) Includes 26,475 shares owned by SAMLP, 459,512 shares owned by BCM and
1,193,768 shares owned by ART, of which the executive officers of the
Company may be deemed to be beneficial owners by virtue of their positions
as executive officers or directors of SAMI, BCM and ART. The executive
officers of the Company disclaim
83
<PAGE> 84
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
(Continued)
beneficial ownership of such shares. Each of the directors of ART may be
deemed to be beneficial owners of the shares owned by ART by virtue of
their positions as directors of ART. Each of the directors of BCM may be
deemed to be beneficial owners by virtue of their positions as directors
of BCM. The directors of ART and BCM disclaim such beneficial ownership.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Certain Business Relationships
In February 1989, the Company's Board of Directors voted to retain BCM as the
Company's advisor. See ITEM 10. "DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ADVISOR TO
THE REGISTRANT - The Advisor." BCM is a corporation of which Messrs. Paulson,
Blaha, Endendyk and Holland serve as executive officers. Gene E. Phillips served
as a director of BCM until December 22, 1989 and as Chief Executive Officer of
BCM until September 1, 1992. BCM is owned by a trust for the benefit of the
children of Mr. Phillips. Mr. Phillips serves as a representative of his
children's trust which owns BCM and, in such capacity, has substantial contact
with the management of BCM and input with respect to BCM's performance of
advisory services to the Company.
Since February 1990, affiliates of BCM have provided property management
services to the Company. Currently, Carmel, Ltd. provides such property
management services. The general partner of Carmel, Ltd. is BCM. The limited
partners of Carmel, Ltd. are (i) First Equity, (ii) Mr. Phillips and (iii) a
trust for the benefit of the children of Mr. Phillips. Carmel, Ltd. subcontracts
the property-level management and leasing of 26 of the Company's commercial
properties and its hotel and the commercial properties owned by a real estate
partnership in which the Company and IORI are partners to Carmel Realty, which
is a company owned by First Equity.
Prior to December 1, 1992, affiliates of BCM provided brokerage services to the
Company and received brokerage commissions in accordance with the advisory
agreement. Since December 1, 1992, the Company has engaged, on a non-exclusive
basis, Carmel Realty to perform brokerage services for the Company. Carmel
Realty is a company owned by First Equity.
The Directors and officers of the Company also serve as trustees or directors
and officers of CMET and IORI. The Directors owe fiduciary duties to such
entities as well as to the Company under applicable law. CMET and IORI have the
same relationship with BCM as the Company. The Company owned approximately 22.5%
of the outstanding shares of common stock of IORI at December 31, 1997. Gene E.
Phillips is a general partner of SAMLP, the general partner of NRLP and NOLP.
BCM performs certain administrative functions for NRLP and NOLP on a
cost-reimbursement basis. BCM also serves as advisor to ART. Mr. Phillips served
as Chairman of the Board and director of ART until November 16, 1992. Messrs.
Paulson, Blaha, Endendyk and Holland serve as executive officers of ART.
From April 1992 to December 31, 1992, Mr. Stokely was employed as a paid
Consultant and since January 1, 1993 as a part-time unpaid Consultant
84
<PAGE> 85
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
Certain Business Relationships (Continued)
for Eldercare, a nonprofit corporation engaged in the acquisition of low income
and elderly housing. Eldercare has a revolving loan commitment from Syntek West,
Inc., of which Mr. Phillips is the sole shareholder. Eldercare filed for
bankruptcy protection in July 1993, and was dismissed from bankruptcy in October
1994. Eldercare again filed for bankruptcy protection in May 1995, and was
reorganized in bankruptcy in February 1996, and has since paid all debts as
directed by the Court.
Related Party Transactions
Historically, the Company has engaged in and may continue to engage in business
transactions, including real estate partnerships, with related parties. The
Company's management believes that all of the related party transactions
represented the best investments available at the time and were at least as
advantageous to the Company as could have been obtained from unrelated third
parties.
As more fully described in ITEM 2. PROPERTIES - Real Estate," the Company is a
partner with IORI in the Tri-City Limited Partnership and Nakash Income
Associates. The Company owns 341,500 shares of the common stock of IORI, an
approximate 22.5% interest.
In 1997, the Company paid BCM and its affiliates $2.8 million in advisory and
net income fees, $517,000 in mortgage brokerage and equity refinancing fees,
$3.0 million in property acquisition fees, $738,000 in real estate brokerage
commissions and $2.3 million in property and construction management fees and
leasing commissions, net of property management fees paid to subcontractors,
other than Carmel Realty. In addition, as provided in the Advisory Agreement,
BCM received cost reimbursements from the Company of $1.2 million in 1997.
Restrictions on Related Party Transactions
Article FOURTEENTH of the Company's Articles of Incorporation provides that the
Company shall not, directly or indirectly, contract or engage in any transaction
with (i) any director, officer or employee of the Company, (ii) any director,
officer or employee of the advisor, (iii) the advisor or (iv) any affiliate or
associate (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) of any of the aforementioned persons, unless (a) the
material facts as to the relationship among or financial interest of the
relevant individuals or persons and as to the contract or transaction are
disclosed to or are known by the Board of Directors or the appropriate committee
thereof and (b) the Board of Directors or committee thereof determines that such
contract or transaction is fair to the Company and simultaneously authorizes or
ratifies such contract or transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of
independent directors of the Company entitled to vote thereon.
Article FOURTEENTH defines an "Independent Director" as one who is neither an
officer or employee of the Company nor a director, officer or employee of the
Company's advisor.
85
<PAGE> 86
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
Restrictions on Related Party Transactions (Continued)
Pursuant to the terms of the Modification of Stipulation of Settlement (the
"Olive Modification") in the Olive Litigation, as more fully discussed in ITEM
3. "LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Olive Litigation," which became effective on January 11,
1995, certain related party transactions which the Company may enter into prior
to April 28, 1999, require the unanimous approval of the Company's Board of
Directors. In addition, such related party transactions are to be discouraged
and may only be entered into in exceptional circumstances and after a
determination by the Company's Board of Directors that the transaction is in the
best interests of the Company and that no other opportunity exists that is as
good as the opportunity presented by such transaction.
The Olive Modification requirements for related party transactions do not apply
to direct contractual agreements for services between the Company and the
Advisor or one of its affiliates (including the Advisory Agreement, the
Brokerage Agreement and the property management contracts). These agreements,
pursuant to the specific terms of the Olive Modification, require the prior
approval by two-thirds of the Directors of the Company, and if required,
approval by a majority of the Company's stockholders. The Olive Modification
requirements for related party transactions also do not apply to joint ventures
between or among the Company and CMET, IORI or NIRT or any of their affiliates
or subsidiaries and a third party having no prior or intended future business or
financial relationship with Gene E. Phillips, William S. Friedman, the Advisor,
or any affiliate of such parties. Such joint ventures may be entered into on the
affirmative vote of a majority of the Directors of the Company.
An Amendment to the Olive Modification (the "Olive Amendment") was approved by
the Court on July 3, 1997. The Olive Amendment requires that additional
requirements be met for certain transactions with affiliates ("Affiliated
Transaction"). Independent counsel to the Board must review, advise and report
to the Company's Board of Directors on any Affiliated Transaction prior to its
consideration and approval by the Company's Board of Directors and the Company's
Board of Directors must unanimously approve the transaction after receiving
independent counsel's advice and report. In addition, a notice must be given to
the plaintiffs' counsel at least 10 days prior to the closing of the transaction
and during such 10 day period plaintiffs' counsel is entitled to seek a Court
order prohibiting consummation of the transaction. Neither BCM nor any of its
affiliates may receive any fees or commissions in connection with an Affiliated
Transaction.
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
86
<PAGE> 87
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
Consolidated Balance Sheets -
December 31, 1997 and 1996
Consolidated Statements of Operations -
Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity -
Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
Schedule IV - Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the
required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the
Notes thereto.
3. Incorporated Financial Statements
Consolidated Financial Statements of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Item 8 of Income Opportunity Realty Investors,
Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995).
4. Exhibits
The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this Report:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------- -------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
3.0 Articles of Incorporation of Transcontinental Realty
Investors, Inc., as filed on December 20, 1991 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to the Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991).
</TABLE>
87
<PAGE> 88
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------- -------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
3.1 Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., as filed on June 3,
1996 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated June 3, 1996).
3.2 By-Laws of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.2 to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1991).
10.0 Advisory Agreement dated as of March 7, 1995, between
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. and Basic Capital
Management, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1994).
27.0 Financial Data Schedule, filed herewith.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
A Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 16, 1997, was
filed with respect to Item 2. Acquisition or Disposition of
Assets," and Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits,"
which reports the acquisition of the Terrace Hills
Apartments, the Crescent Place Apartments, the Savings of
America Building, the Treehouse Apartments, the Villas at
Countryside Apartments, the Bonita Plaza Office Building,
the Country Bend Apartments, the Encon Warehouse, the
Sandstone Apartments and the Sunchase Apartments filed
October 14, 1997 and was amended on Form 8-K/A, filed
December 3, 1997.
A Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 22, 1997, was
filed with respect to Item 2. "Acquisition or Disposition of
Assets," and Item 7. "Financial Statements and Exhibits,"
which reports the acquisition of Fairpark Apartments, Villa
Piedra Apartments, Lexington Center, and the Timbers
Apartments filed January 9, 1998.
</TABLE>
88
<PAGE> 89
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
Dated: March 20, 1998 By: /s/ Randall M. Paulson
--------------------- ----------------------------------
Randall M. Paulson
President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the date indicated.
By: /s/ Ted P. Stokely
----------------------------------
Ted P. Stokely
Chairman of the Board
and Director
By: /s/ Richard W. Douglas By: /s/ Murray Shaw
--------------------------- -------------------------
Richard W. Douglas Murray Shaw
Director Director
By: /s/ Larry E. Harley By: /s/ Martin L. White
--------------------------- -------------------------
Larry E. Harley Martin L. White
Director Director
By: /s/ R. Douglas Leonhard By: /s/ Edward G. Zampa
--------------------------- -------------------------
R. Douglas Leonhard Edward G. Zampa
Director Director
Dated: March 20, 1998 By: /s/ Thomas A. Holland
------------------------ -------------------------
Thomas A. Holland
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
89
<PAGE> 90
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
EXHIBITS TO
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description Page
- -------- ----------- ----
<S> <C> <C>
27.0 Financial Data Schedule. 91
</TABLE>
90
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 24,733
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 4,838
<ALLOWANCES> 891
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 0
<PP&E> 332,068
<DEPRECIATION> 56,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 319,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 0
<BONDS> 222,029
0
0
<COMMON> 39
<OTHER-SE> 86,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 319,535
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 54,462
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 32,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 9,578
<LOSS-PROVISION> 1,337
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 16,765
<INCOME-PRETAX> 12,599
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 12,599
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 12,599
<EPS-PRIMARY> 3.22
<EPS-DILUTED> 3.22
</TABLE>
