UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
----------------------------------
FORM 10-K
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
For the transition period from ______ to _______ .
Commission File Number: 0-13129
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
-----------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 04-2829686
-------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
265 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
- ------------------------------------------ -----
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (617) 439-8118
--------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange on
Title of each class which registered
- ------------------- ------------------------
None None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
-------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. |X|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|.
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the registrant. Not applicable.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Documents Form 10-K Reference
- --------- -------------------
Prospectus of registrant dated Part IV
September 17, 1984, as supplemented
Current Report on Form 8-K Part IV
dated September 30, 1999
<PAGE>
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
1999 FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I Page
- ------ ----
Item 1 Business I-1
Item 2 Properties I-3
Item 3 Legal Proceedings I-4
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders I-4
Part II
- --------
Item 5 Market for the Partnership's Limited Partnership
Interests and Related Security Holder Matters II-1
Item 6 Selected Financial Data II-1
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations II-2
Item 7A Market Risk Disclosures II-7
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data II-7
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure II-7
Part III
- --------
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Partnership III-1
Item 11 Executive Compensation III-2
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management III-2
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions III-3
Part IV
- --------
Item 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports
on Form 8-K IV-1
Signatures IV-2
Index to Exhibits IV-3
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data F-1 to F-29
<PAGE>
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. The Partnership's actual results could differ materially
from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that
might cause such a difference are discussed in Item 7 in the section entitled
"Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results" beginning on page II-6 of
this Form 10-K.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership (the "Partnership")
is a limited partnership formed in April 1984 under the Uniform Limited
Partnership Act of the State of Delaware for the purpose of investing in a
diversified portfolio of existing income-producing operating properties such as
apartments, shopping centers, office buildings, and other similar
income-producing properties. The Partnership sold $60,000,000 in Limited
Partnership units (the "Units"), representing 60,000 units at $1,000 per Unit,
from September 17, 1984 to September 16, 1985 pursuant to a Registration
Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933 (Registration No.
2-91080). Limited Partners will not be required to make any additional
contributions.
The Partnership originally invested the net proceeds of the public
offering, through joint venture partnerships, in five operating properties. As
discussed further below, through September 30, 1999 three of the Partnership's
original investments had been sold (including two during fiscal 1999) and
another investment had been lost through foreclosure proceedings. As of
September 30, 1999, the Partnership owned, through a joint venture partnership,
an interest in the operating property set forth in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Joint Venture Date of
Name and Type of Property Acquisition Type of
Location Size of Interest Ownership (1)
- --------------------------------- ---- ---------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Gwinnett Mall Corners Associates 304,000 8/28/85 Fee ownership of land and
Mall Corners Shopping Center gross improvements (through
Gwinnett County, Georgia leasable joint venture)
sq. ft.
</TABLE>
(1) See Notes to the Financial Statements filed with this Annual Report for a
description of the long-term mortgage indebtedness secured by the
Partnership's operating property investment and for a description of the
agreement through which the Partnership has acquired this real estate
investment.
On November 16, 1998, Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates sold its operating
investment property, the Hurstbourne Apartments to an unrelated party for $22.9
million. The sale generated net proceeds of approximately $12,941,000 to the
Partnership after the repayment of the outstanding first mortgage loan of
approximately $8,124,000, accrued interest of approximately $30,000, a
prepayment penalty of $187,000, closing proration adjustments of approximately
$380,000, closing costs of approximately $266,000 and a payment of approximately
$972,000 to the Partnership's co-venture partner for its share of the net
proceeds in accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement. On
September 30, 1999, Regent's Walk Associates sold its operating investment
property, the Regent's Walk Apartments, to an affiliate of its unaffiliated
joint venture partner for $17.75 million. The sale generated net proceeds of
approximately $8,068,000, after the assumption of the outstanding first mortgage
loan of approximately $8,624,000, accrued interest of approximately $51,000,
closing proration adjustments of approximately $189,000, and a payment of
approximately $818,000 to the Partnership's non-affiliated co-venture partner
for its share of the net proceeds in accordance with the terms of the joint
venture agreement. In addition, as a result of the Regent's Walk sale, the
Partnership received $117,000 which had been held in escrow at the property plus
$257,000 as a result of operations of the property through the date of sale.
The Partnership previously owned an interest in Bailey N. Y. Associates, a
joint venture which owned the 150 Broadway Office Building; a 238,000 square
foot office and retail building located in New York City. The Partnership sold
its interest in the Bailey N. Y. Associates joint venture on September 22, 1989
for cash totalling $4,000,000 and a second mortgage note receivable in the
amount of $14,000,000. Due to a deterioration in the commercial real estate
market in New York City, which adversely impacted property operations, the owner
of the 150 Broadway Office Building defaulted on its mortgage loan obligations
during fiscal 1990 and filed for bankruptcy protection in July 1991. During
fiscal 1993, the Partnership reached a settlement agreement involving both the
first mortgage lender and the owner. Under this agreement, which was approved by
the bankruptcy court and declared effective on June 15, 1993, the Partnership
agreed to restructure its second mortgage position. During fiscal 1995, the
Partnership agreed to assign its second mortgage interest in the 150 Broadway
Office Building to an affiliate of the borrower in return for a payment of
$400,000. Subsequently, the borrower was unable to perform under the terms of
this agreement and the Partnership agreed to reduce the required cash
compensation to $300,000. The Partnership received $200,000 of the agreed upon
sale proceeds during the second quarter of fiscal 1995. The remaining $100,000
was funded into an escrow account on May 31, 1995, to be released upon the
resolution of certain matters between the borrower and the first mortgage holder
but in no event later than June 10, 1996. In April 1996, the borrower and the
first mortgage lender resolved their remaining issues and released the $100,000
plus accrued interest to the Partnership. With the release of the escrowed
funds, the Partnership's interest in and any obligations related to the 150
Broadway Office Building were terminated.
During fiscal 1992, the Partnership forfeited its interest in the
Northbridge Office Centre as a result of certain defaults under the terms of the
property's mortgage indebtedness. The mortgage lender took title to the
Northbridge property through foreclosure proceedings on April 20, 1992, after a
protracted period of negotiations failed to produce a mutually acceptable
restructuring agreement. Furthermore, the Partnership's efforts to recapitalize,
sell or refinance the property were unsuccessful. The inability of the
Northbridge joint venture to generate sufficient funds to meet its debt service
obligations resulted mainly from a significant oversupply of competing office
space in the West Palm Beach, Florida market. Management did not foresee any
near term improvement in such conditions and ultimately determined that it was
in the Partnership's best interests not to contest the lender's foreclosure
action.
The Partnership's original investment objectives were to:
(i) provide the Limited Partners with cash distributions which, to some
extent, would not constitute taxable income;
(ii) preserve and protect Limited Partners' capital;
(iii) achieve long-term appreciation in the value of its properties; and
(iv) provide a build up of equity through the reduction of mortgage loans on
its properties.
Through September 30, 1999, the Limited Partners had received cumulative
cash distributions totalling approximately $31,255,000, or $531.00 per original
$1,000 investment for the Partnership's earliest investors. Of this amount,
$2,040,000, or $34 per original $1,000 investment, represents a return of
capital paid on February 14, 1997 from the excess proceeds from the refinancing
of Mall Corners, the release of the escrowed funds from the sale of the
Partnership's interest in the 150 Broadway Office Building and Partnership cash
reserves which exceeded expected future requirements. The sale of the
Hurstbourne Apartments resulted in a special distribution of $9,300,000, or $155
per original $1,000 investment, which was paid on December 15, 1998 to unit
holders of record on November 16, 1998. As discussed further in Item 7,
approximately $3,641,000 of the total net proceeds from the sale of the
Hurstbourne Apartments were added to the Partnership`s cash reserves for
potential investment in the remaining asset. In addition, the sale of the
Regent's Walk Apartments resulted in a special distribution subsequent to
year-end of $9,180,000 or $153.00 per original $1,000 investment on October 15,
1999 to unitholders of record on the September 30, 1999 sale date. Of the
$153,000 total, $140.30 resulted from the sale of Regent's Walk and $12.70 was
from Partnership reserves that exceeded expected future requirements. The
remaining distributions have been paid from operating cash flow. A substantial
portion of these cash distributions paid to date has been sheltered from current
taxable income. The Partnership reinstated the payment of regular quarterly cash
distributions effective for the quarter ended June 30, 1994 at an annualized
rate of 2% on original invested capital. Distributions had been discontinued in
1990 primarily due to the cash deficits associated with the Partnership's two
commercial properties, Northbridge Office Centre and the 150 Broadway Office
Building, which investments have since been disposed of, as discussed further
above. Distributions were increased to an annualized rate of 3.6% and 3.63% on
remaining invested capital for the quarters ended March 31, 1997 and June 30,
1997 and remained at 3.63% through the end of fiscal 1998. Because of the
reduction in distributable cash flow to be received by the Partnership as a
result of the sale of the Hurstbourne Apartments, the annual distribution rate
was reduced from 3.63% to 2.50% beginning with the payment made on May 15, 1999
for the quarter ended March 31, 1999.
After the sales of the Hurstbourne and Regent's Walk properties, the
Partnership retains an interest in one of its five original investment
properties. However, the loss of the investment in Northbridge, which
represented 25% of the Partnership's original investment portfolio, in all
likelihood, will result in the Partnership's inability to return the full amount
of the original invested capital to the Limited Partners. The amount of the
original capital that will be returned will depend upon the proceeds received
from the final liquidation of the remaining investment. The amount of such
proceeds will ultimately depend upon the value of the underlying investment
property at the time of the final disposition, which cannot presently be
determined. The Partnership is currently focusing on potential disposition
strategies for the remaining investment in its portfolio. The Partnership
previously reported that although no assurances could be given, it was
contemplated that a liquidation of the Partnership could be completed by
calendar year-end 1999. However, because of the recent announced closing of an
anchor tenant at Mall Corners, as well as other current vacancies at the
property, the joint venture partner believes that it could be desirable from its
perspective to re-lease all of the currently vacant space at the Center before
selling the property. The Partnership is still exploring its strategic
alternatives which include exercising its rights of first offer under the joint
venture agreement. As a result, a liquidation of the Partnership will not be
completed until the first half of calendar year 2000 at the earliest. There are
no assurances, however, that a sale of the remaining investment and a
liquidation of the Partnership will be completed within this time frame.
The remaining property in which the Partnership has an interest is a
retail shopping center that is located in a real estate market in which its
faces significant competition for the revenues it generates. The shopping center
competes for long-term commercial tenants with numerous projects of similar type
generally on the basis of location, rental rates and tenant improvement
allowances.
The Partnership has no operating property investments located outside the
United States. The Partnership is engaged solely in the business of real estate
investment, therefore, presentation of information about industry segments is
not applicable.
The Partnership has no employees; it has, however, entered into an
Advisory Contract with PaineWebber Properties Incorporated (the "Adviser"),
which is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Partnership. The
Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PaineWebber Incorporated ("PWI"), a
wholly owned subsidiary of PaineWebber Group, Inc. ("PaineWebber").
The General Partners of the Partnership (the "General Partners") are Sixth
Income Properties Fund, Inc. and Properties Associates 1985, L.P. Sixth Income
Properties Fund, Inc. (the "Managing General Partner"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of PaineWebber, is the managing general partner of the Partnership.
The associate general partner of the Partnership is Properties Associates 1985,
L.P. (the "Associate General Partner"), a Virginia limited partnership, certain
limited partners of which are also officers of the Adviser and the Managing
General Partner. Subject to the Managing General Partner's overall authority,
the business of the Partnership is managed by the Adviser.
The terms of transactions between the Partnership and affiliates of the
Managing General Partner of the Partnership are set forth in Items 11 and 13
below to which reference is hereby made for a description of such terms and
transactions.
Item 2. Properties
As of September 30, 1999, the Partnership owned an interest in one
operating property through a joint venture partnership. The joint venture
partnership and the related property is referred to under Item 1 above to which
reference is made for the name, location and description of the property.
Occupancy figures for each fiscal quarter during 1999, along with an
average for the year, are presented below for each property owned during fiscal
1999.
Percent Leased At
-------------------------------------------------
Fiscal
1999
12/31/98 3/31/99 6/30/99 9/30/99 Average
-------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Regent's Walk Apartments 91% 87% 90% N/A (1) N/A
Mall Corners Shopping Center 81% 73% 73% 73% 75%
(1) The property was sold on September 30, 1999 as described in Item 1.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Partnership is not subject to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Partnership's Limited Partnership Interests and Related
Security Holder Matters
At September 30, 1999, there were 3,695 record holders of Units in the
Partnership. There is no public market for the resale of Units, and it is not
anticipated that a public market for Units will develop. Upon request, the
Managing General Partner will endeavor to assist a Unitholder desiring to
transfer his Units and may utilize the services of PWI in this regard. The price
to be paid for the Units will be subject to negotiation by the Unitholder. The
Managing General Partner will not redeem or repurchase Units.
Reference is made to Item 6 below for a discussion of the amount of cash
distributions made to the Limited Partners during fiscal 1999.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership
------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per Unit data)
Years Ended September 30,
-----------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 445 $ 106 $ 237 $ 259 $ 361
Operating loss $ (2) $ (301) $ (148) $ (92) $ (60)
Partnership's share of
unconsolidated ventures'
income $ 496 $ 1,128 $ 1,263 $ 874 $ 322
Partnership share of gains
on sales of operating
investment properties $ 18,496 - - - -
Net income $ 18,990 $ 827 $ 1,115 $ 782 $ 262
Per Limited Partnership Unit:
Net income $ 313.18 $ 13.64 $ 18.40 $ 12.89 $ 4.33
Cash distributions from
operations $ 27.68 $ 35.08 $ 27.46 $ 20.00 $ 20.00
Cash distributions from
sale, refinancing or
other disposition
transactions $ 155.00 - $ 34.00 - -
Total assets $ 13,544 $ 4,778 $ 6,101 $ 8,658 $ 9,100
</TABLE>
The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual
Report.
The above per Limited Partnership Unit information is based upon the
60,000 Limited Partnership Units outstanding during each year.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements
- --------------------------------------------------
The following discussion of financial condition includes forward-looking
statements which reflect management's current views with respect to future
events and financial performance of the Partnership. These forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those
identified below under the heading "Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating
Results", which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical
results or those anticipated. The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," and
similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which were made
based on facts and conditions as they existed as of the date of this report. The
Partnership undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
- -------------------------------
The Partnership offered Units of Limited Partnership interests to the
public from September 17, 1984 to September 16, 1985 pursuant to a Registration
Statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933. Gross proceeds of $60,000,000
were received by the Partnership, and after deducting selling expenses and
offering costs, approximately $51,889,000 was originally invested in five
operating investment properties through joint ventures. As previously reported,
the sale of the Partnership's remaining interest in the 150 Broadway Office
Building was finalized during fiscal 1996, and the Partnership's interest in the
Northbridge Office Centre was lost through foreclosure proceedings in fiscal
1992. As discussed further below, the Partnership completed the sales of two of
its joint venture operating properties during fiscal 1999. As of September 30,
1999, the Partnership had one remaining joint venture investment in a retail
shopping center. At the present time the Partnership does not have any
commitments for additional investments but may be called upon to fund its
portion of operating deficits or capital improvements of the remaining joint
venture in accordance with the joint venture agreement.
During the first quarter of fiscal 1999, on November 16, 1998,
Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates, a joint venture in which the Partnership had an
interest, sold its operating investment property, the Hurstbourne Apartments,
located in Louisville, Kentucky, to an unrelated party for $22.9 million. The
sale generated net proceeds of approximately $12,941,000 to the Partnership
after the repayment of the outstanding first mortgage loan of approximately
$8,124,000, accrued interest of approximately $30,000, a prepayment penalty of
$187,000, closing proration adjustments of approximately $380,000, closing costs
of approximately $266,000 and a payment of approximately $972,000 to the
Partnership's co-venture partner for its share of the net proceeds in accordance
with the terms of the joint venture agreement. As a result of the sale of the
Hurstbourne property, the Partnership made a special distribution of $9,300,000,
or $155 per original $1,000 Unit, to the Limited Partners on December 15, 1998.
Approximately $3,641,000 of the Hurstbourne net sale proceeds were retained and
added to the Partnership's cash reserves to ensure that the Partnership has
sufficient capital resources to fund its share of potential capital improvement
expenses at the Mall Corners Shopping Center. The sale of the Hurstbourne
property resulted in a gain of $11,262,000 at the joint venture level for
financial reporting purposes in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. The
Partnership's share of such gain was $10,228,000.
The Partnership had previously increased its distribution rate from 2.0%
to 3.6% per annum on remaining invested capital of $966 per original $1,000
investment for the quarter ended March 31, 1997. The distribution rate was
adjusted upward slightly to 3.63% per annum effective with the distribution paid
on August 15, 1997 for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and remained at that
level through the first quarter of fiscal 1999. However, because of the
reduction in distributable cash flow to be received by the Partnership as a
result of the sale of the Hurstbourne Apartments, the annual distribution rate
was decreased from 3.63% to 2.50% beginning with the payment made on May 15,
1999 for the quarter ended March 31, 1999.
On September 30, 1999, Regent's Walk Associates, a joint venture in which
the Partnership had an interest, sold its operating investment property, the
Regent's Walk Apartments, located in Overland Park, Kansas, to an affiliate of
its unaffiliated joint venture partner for $17.75 million. The sale generated
net proceeds of approximately $8,068,000, after the assumption of the
outstanding first mortgage loan of approximately $8,624,000, accrued interest of
approximately $51,000, closing proration adjustments of approximately $189,000,
and a payment of approximately $818,000 to the Partnership's non-affiliated
co-venture partner for its share of the net proceeds in accordance with the
terms of the joint venture agreement. In addition, as a result of the Regent's
Walk sale, the Partnership received $117,000 which had been held in escrow at
the property plus $257,000 as a result of operations of the property through the
date of sale. The Partnership made a special distribution to the Limited
Partners of $9,180,000, or $153 per original $1,000 investment, on October 15,
1999 to Unitholders of record on the September 30, 1999 sale date. Of the
$153.00 total, $140.30 resulted from the sale of Regent's Walk and $12.70 was
from Partnership reserves that exceed expected future requirements. As
previously reported, the Partnership had entered into negotiations with its
Regent's Walk Apartments co-venture partner for a sale of the property during
the third quarter of fiscal 1999. On May 19, 1999, the Partnership negotiated a
purchase and sale agreement with an affiliate of the co-venturer to sell the
property for what the Partnership believes was a very favorable price of
$17,750,000. The prospective buyer subsequently made non-refundable deposits
totalling $1,250,000. The only contingency was for approval by the lender for an
assumption of the first mortgage loan as part of the sale transaction. The joint
venture subsequently received this approval and the sale closed on September 30,
1999. The sale of the Regent's Walk Apartments resulted in a gain of $8,268,000
at the joint venture level for financial reporting purposes in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 1999. The Partnership was allocated 100% of this gain per the
terms of the joint venture agreement.
With the sales of the Hurstbourne and Regent's Walk properties, the
Partnership's only remaining real estate investment is a joint venture interest
in the Mall Corners Shopping Center, a 304,000 square foot retail center in
suburban Atlanta, Georgia. As previously reported, the Partnership has been
focusing on potential disposition strategies for the remaining investment in its
portfolio. As part of the efforts to prepare the remaining property for sale,
the Partnership continues to work with the property's leasing and management
team to develop and implement programs that will protect and enhance value and
maximize cash flow. The Partnership had previously reported that, although no
assurances could be given, it was contemplated that a liquidation of the
Partnership could be completed by calendar year-end 1999. However, because of
the recently announced closing of Upton's, an anchor tenant at Mall Corners, as
well as other current vacancies at the property, the Partnership's joint venture
partner believes that it could be desirable from its perspective to re-lease all
of the currently vacant space at the Center before selling the property. The
Partnership is still exploring its strategic alternatives which include
exercising its rights of first offer under the joint venture agreement. As a
result, a liquidation of the Partnership will not be completed until the first
half of calendar year 2000 at the earliest. There are no assurances, however,
that a sale of the remaining investment and a liquidation of the Partnership
will be completed within this time frame.
Mall Corners Shopping Center was 73% leased and occupied as of September
30, 1999, compared to 97% leased as of the end of fiscal 1998. The 73% occupancy
level reflects the vacancy for the former Levitz Furniture store which
represented 16% of the Center's leasable area, the former movie theater that
occupied 8% of the leasable area and four stores that represent 3% of the
leasable area. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, the property's leasing
team renewed nine of the ten leases which were scheduled to expire during the
quarter ended December 31, 1999. These leases represent 6% of the Center's
leasable area. The other tenant which occupies 645 square feet will move from
the Center on December 31, 1999, at the expiration of its lease. Also, leases
are expected to be signed with two new tenants which will occupy 1,843 square
feet early in the year 2000. In addition, the property's leasing team has
negotiated a short-term lease for the holiday season with the retailer, Hit or
Miss. This prospective tenant is testing a new concept which, if successful,
could develop into a long-term lease at Mall Corners. This tenant has
temporarily leased a portion of the former Levitz space. The property leasing
team also continues to work with prospective tenants for the existing vacant
space. As previously reported, the owner of Upton's, an anchor tenant which
leases 16% of the Center's rentable area, announced on July 19, 1999 that all of
the stores in the chain will be closed in the near future. While the owner has
not notified the Partnership or its co-venture partner of their specific
intentions for the Upton's store at Mall Corners there are indications that a
store closing is imminent. As also previously reported, the store formerly
occupied by Toys R Us that abuts the Mall Corners Shopping Center remains
vacant. While the closing of the Toys R Us store does not have a direct
financial impact on Mall Corners, it continues to have a negative impact on the
Center's appearance and the number of shoppers entering the Center.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, one of the anchor tenants at
Mall Corners, Levitz Furniture, which occupied 50,000 square feet, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. As part of the company's reorganization plan,
the store at Mall Corners was closed on October 13, 1997. It then temporarily
reopened for an inventory liquidation sale, after which it was closed
permanently. Because Levitz was a sub-tenant of a national retailer, the Mall
Corners joint venture expected to collect rent on the store through the
expiration of the current lease term in 2001. However, the national retailer
that had sublet the store to Levitz stopped paying the monthly rent due
beginning in April 1998. The Mall Corners joint venture had commenced legal
action to enforce the terms of the existing lease while, at the same time,
pursuing settlement negotiations with the national retailer. During the quarter
ended March 31, 1999, a mutually acceptable settlement was achieved. The Mall
Corners joint venture received $1.1 million during the third quarter of fiscal
1999 as a complete settlement of the rent receivable through the remainder of
the lease term. The Mall Corners mortgage lender required that $450,000 of this
settlement be put up in escrow for future tenant improvement costs. The $650,000
balance of the settlement was distributed to the Partnership in accordance with
the terms of the joint venture agreement.
At September 30, 1999, the Partnership had available cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $12,665,000. Such cash includes the net proceeds
from the sale of the Regent's Walk Apartments, as discussed further above.
Approximately $9.2 million of this cash balance was distributed to the Limited
Partners subsequent to year-end, on October 15, 1999. The remainder of such cash
and cash equivalents will be utilized for Partnership requirements such as the
payment of operating expenses, the funding of future operating deficits or
capital improvements at the remaining joint venture, if necessary, as required
by the joint venture agreement, and for distributions to the partners, as
discussed further above. The source of future liquidity and distributions to the
partners is expected to be from cash generated from the operations of the
Partnership's income-producing investment property and proceeds from the sale or
refinancing of the remaining investment property. Such sources of liquidity are
expected to be sufficient to meet the Partnership's needs on both a short-term
and long-term basis.
As noted above, the Partnership expects to be liquidated in the near term.
Notwithstanding this, the Partnership believes that it has made all necessary
modifications to its existing systems to make them year 2000 compliant and does
not expect that additional costs associated with year 2000 compliance, if any,
will be material to the Partnership's results of operations or financial
position.
<PAGE>
Results of Operations
1999 Compared to 1998
- ---------------------
The Partnership reported net income of $18,990,000 for the year ended
September 30, 1999 as compared to net income of $827,000 for the prior year.
This increase in net income was mainly the result of the Partnership's share of
the gains recognized during fiscal 1999 on the sales of the Hurstbourne
Apartments and the Regent's Walk Apartments, as discussed further above. The
Partnership's share of such gains amounted to $18,496,000. In addition, the
Partnership's operating loss decreased by $299,000 during the current year. The
decrease in the Partnership's operating loss resulted from a $339,000 increase
in interest and other income and a $42,000 decrease in management fees, which
were offset by an $82,000 increase in general and administrative expenses. The
increase in interest and other income resulted mainly from interest received on
a loan to Regent's Walk that was repaid from the proceeds from the sale of the
property in fiscal 1999. The increase in interest and other income also resulted
partly from higher average outstanding cash reserve balances maintained during
fiscal 1999 due to the holdback of a portion of the proceeds from the sale of
the Hurstbourne Apartments on November 16, 1998, as discussed further above.
Management fees were lower during the current year as a result of a decrease in
the Partnership's distributable cash, upon which the management fees are based.
General and administrative expenses increased mainly due to an increase in
certain required professional fees for the current fiscal year.
The Partnership's share of gain on sales of the operating investment
properties and the decrease in the Partnership's operating loss were partially
offset by a decrease of $632,000 in the Partnership's share of ventures' income
for the current fiscal year. This decrease in the Partnership's share of
ventures' income was primarily due to the sale of the Hurstbourne property in
the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Since the Hurstbourne property was sold on
November 16, 1998, the Partnership's share of ventures' income only includes
operations from the joint venture through the date of the sale in the current
year. The decrease in the Partnership's share of income from the Hurstbourne
joint venture was partially offset by increases in operating income at both
Regent's Walk and Mall Corners during fiscal 1999. Operating income increased at
Regent's Walk primarily due to a decrease in repairs and maintenance expense.
Operating income increased at Mall Corners as a result of the receipt of the
Levitz Furniture settlement proceeds of $1.1 million, as discussed further
above.
1998 Compared to 1997
- ---------------------
The Partnership reported net income of $827,000 for the year ended
September 30, 1998 as compared to net income of $1,115,000 for the prior year.
This decrease in net income was the result of a $135,000 decrease in the
Partnership's share of ventures' income and a $153,000 increase in the
Partnership's operating loss. The decrease in the Partnership's share of
ventures' income was primarily due to a $321,000 increase in combined expenses.
Combined expenses increased mainly due to an increase in property operating
expenses of $365,000. Property operating expenses increased primarily due to a
significant increase in repairs and maintenance expenses at Regent's Walk as a
result of an overall enhancement program implemented during fiscal 1998. The
higher property operating expenses were partially offset by an increase of
$143,000 in combined revenues and a decrease in interest expense of $65,000.
Combined revenues increased mainly due higher rental revenues at Mall Corners
due to certain leasing gains achieved during fiscal 1998 and increases in rental
rates on the new leases signed during fiscal 1998. The decline in interest
expense was the result of the scheduled amortization of the outstanding loan
principal balances.
The unfavorable change in the Partnership's operating loss resulted from a
decrease in interest income of $131,000 and an increase in management fee
expense of $34,000. Interest income decreased due to a decline in the average
amount of the Partnership's cash reserves as a result of a special distribution
made in February 1997. Management fees increased due to the increase during
fiscal 1997 in the Partnership's distributable cash upon which management fees
are based, as discussed further above.
1997 Compared to 1996
- ---------------------
The Partnership reported net income of $1,115,000 for the year ended
September 30, 1997 as compared to net income of $782,000 for the prior year.
This increase in net income was the result of a $389,000 increase in the
Partnership's share of ventures' income, which was partially offset by a $56,000
increase in the Partnership's operating loss. The increase in the Partnership's
share of ventures' income was primarily due to a $289,000 increase in combined
revenues and a $143,000 decrease in combined expenses. Combined revenues
increased mainly due to higher rental revenues at Mall Corners due to increases
in rental rates on the new leases signed during fiscal 1997. Rental revenues at
both the Hurstbourne and Regent's Walk properties were up only slightly compared
to fiscal 1996. The decrease in combined expenses was primarily attributable to
a decrease in the interest, real estate tax and property operating expense
categories, which were partially offset by an increase in depreciation and
amortization expense. Interest expense decreased mainly due to the lower
interest rate obtained on the Mall Corners mortgage note, which was refinanced
at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 1996. Real estate tax expense
decreased due to a decline in real estate tax assessments at all three
properties during fiscal 1997. Property operating expenses decreased mainly due
to a reduction in repairs and maintenance and general administrative expenses at
the Hurstbourne joint venture and a decrease in general and administrative
expenses at Mall Corners. The reductions in property operating expenses at
Hurstbourne and Mall Corners during fiscal 1997 were partially offset by an
increase in repairs and maintenance related costs at Regent's Walk.
The unfavorable change in the Partnership's operating loss resulted from
the combined effect of a decline in total revenues and an increase in management
fee expense. Total revenues declined primarily due to the income recognition
that occurred in fiscal 1996 for the $100,000 received for the Partnership's
interest in the 150 Broadway Office Building. This was offset, in part, by an
increase of $78,000 in interest income during fiscal 1997. Management fees
increased due to the increase during fiscal 1997 in the Partnership's
distributable cash upon which management fees are based, as discussed further
above.
Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results
- --------------------------------------------------
The following factors could cause actual results to differ materially from
historical results or those anticipated:
Real Estate Investment Risks. Real property investments are subject to
varying degrees of risk. Revenues and property values may be adversely affected
by the general economic climate, the local economic climate and local real
estate conditions, including (i) the perceptions of prospective tenants of the
attractiveness of the property; (ii) the ability to retain qualified individuals
to provide adequate management and maintenance of the property; (iii) the
inability to collect rent due to bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or
otherwise; and (iv) increased operating costs. Real estate values may also be
adversely affected by such factors as applicable laws, including tax laws,
interest rate levels and the availability of financing.
Effect of Uninsured Loss. The Partnership carries comprehensive liability,
fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance with respect to its
remaining property with insured limits and policy specifications that management
believes are customary for similar properties. There are, however, certain types
of losses (generally of a catastrophic nature such as wars, floods or
earthquakes) which may be either uninsurable, or, in management's judgment, not
economically insurable. Should an uninsured loss occur, the Partnership could
lose both its invested capital in and anticipated profits from the property.
Possible Environmental Liabilities. Under various federal, state and local
environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or
operator of real property may become liable for the costs of the investigation,
removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under, in or
migrating from such property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to
whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of
such hazardous or toxic substances.
The Partnership is not aware of any notification by any private party or
governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim in
connection with environmental conditions at its remaining property that it
believes will involve any expenditure which would be material to the
Partnership, nor is the Partnership aware of any environmental condition with
respect to the remaining property that it believes will involve any such
material expenditure. However, there can be no assurance that any
non-compliance, liability, claim or expenditure will not arise in the future.
Competition. The financial performance of the Partnership's remaining real
estate investment will be significantly impacted by the competition from
comparable properties in its local market areas. The occupancy levels and rental
rates achievable at the property are largely a function of supply and demand in
the market. The retail segment of the real estate market in general continues to
suffer to some extent from an oversupply of space in many markets resulting from
overbuilding in recent years and the trend of consolidations and bankruptcies
among retailers prompted by the generally flat rate of growth in overall retail
sales. There are no assurances that these competitive pressures will not
adversely affect the operations and/or market values of the Partnership's
investment property in the future.
Impact of Joint Venture Structure. The ownership of the remaining
investment through a joint venture partnership could adversely impact the timing
of the Partnership's planned disposition of its remaining asset and the amount
of proceeds received from such a disposition. It is possible that the
Partnership's co-venture partner could have economic or business interests which
are inconsistent with those of the Partnership. Given the rights which both
parties have under the terms of the joint venture agreement, any conflict
between the partners could result in a delay in completing a sale of the related
operating property and could lead to an impairment in the marketability of the
property to third parties for purposes of achieving the highest possible sale
price.
Availability of a Pool of Qualified Buyers. The availability of a pool of
qualified and interested buyers for the Partnership's remaining asset is
critical to the Partnership's ability to realize the estimated fair market value
of such property at the time of its final disposition. Demand by buyers of
retail properties is affected by many factors, including the size, quality, age,
condition and location of the subject property, the quality and stability of the
tenant roster, the terms of any long-term leases, potential environmental
liability concerns, the existing debt structure, the liquidity in the debt and
equity markets for asset acquisitions, the general level of market interest
rates and the general and local economic climates.
Inflation
- ---------
The Partnership completed its fifteenth full year of operations in 1999
and the effects of inflation and changes in prices on the Partnership's
operating results to date have not been significant.
Inflation in future periods may result in an increase in revenues, as well
as operating expenses, at the Partnership's operating investment property. Most
of the existing leases with tenants at the Partnership's retail shopping center
contain rental escalation and/or expense reimbursement clauses based on
increases in tenant sales or property operating expenses. Such increases in
rental income would be expected to at least partially offset the corresponding
increases in Partnership and property operating expenses caused by future
inflation.
Item 7A. Market Risk Disclosures
As discussed further in the notes to the accompanying financial
statements, the Partnership's financial instruments are limited to cash and cash
equivalents. The cash equivalents are invested exclusively in short-term money
market instruments. The Partnership does not invest in derivative financial
instruments or engage in hedging transactions. In light of these facts,
management does not believe that the Partnership's financial instruments have
any material exposure to market risk factors.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements and supplementary data are included under Item 14
of this Annual Report.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
<PAGE>
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Partnership
The Managing General Partner of the Partnership is Sixth Income Properties
Fund, Inc. a Delaware corporation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
PaineWebber. The Associate General Partner of the Partnership is Properties
Associates 1985, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership, certain limited partners
of which are also officers of the Adviser and the Managing General Partner. The
Managing General Partner has overall authority and responsibility for the
Partnership's operation, however, the day-to-day business of the Partnership is
managed by the Adviser pursuant to an advisory contract.
(a) and (b) The names and ages of the directors and principal executive
officers of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership are as follows:
Date elected
Name Office Age to Office
---- ------ --- ---------
Bruce J. Rubin President and Director 40 8/22/96
Terrence E. Fancher Director 46 10/10/96
Walter V. Arnold Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 52 10/29/85
David F. Brooks First Vice President and
Assistant Treasurer 57 4/25/84 *
Thomas W. Boland Vice President and Controller 37 12/1/91
* The date of incorporation of the Managing General Partner.
(c) There are no other significant employees in addition to the directors
and executive officers mentioned above.
(d) There is no family relationship among any of the foregoing directors
and executive officers of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership. All
of the foregoing directors and executive officers have been elected to serve
until the annual meeting of the Managing General Partner.
(e) All of the directors and officers of the Managing General Partner hold
similar positions in affiliates of the Managing General Partner, which are the
corporate general partners of other real estate limited partnerships sponsored
by PWI, and for which PaineWebber Properties Incorporated serves as the Adviser.
The business experience of each of the directors and principal executive
officers of the Managing General Partner is as follows:
Bruce J. Rubin is President and Director of the Managing General Partner.
Mr. Rubin was named President and Chief Executive Officer of PWPI in August
1996. Mr. Rubin joined PaineWebber Real Estate Investment Banking in November
1995 as a Senior Vice President. Prior to joining PaineWebber, Mr. Rubin was
employed by Kidder, Peabody and served as President for KP Realty Advisers, Inc.
Prior to his association with Kidder, Mr. Rubin was a Senior Vice President and
Director of Direct Investments at Smith Barney Shearson. Prior thereto, Mr.
Rubin was a First Vice President and a real estate workout specialist at
Shearson Lehman Brothers. Prior to joining Shearson Lehman Brothers in 1989, Mr.
Rubin practiced law in the Real Estate Group at Willkie Farr & Gallagher. Mr.
Rubin is a graduate of Stanford University and Stanford Law School.
Terrence E. Fancher was appointed a Director of the Managing General
Partner in October 1996. Mr. Fancher is the Managing Director in charge of
PaineWebber's Real Estate Investment Banking Group. He joined PaineWebber as a
result of the firm's acquisition of Kidder, Peabody. Mr. Fancher is responsible
for the origination and execution of all of PaineWebber's REIT transactions,
advisory assignments for real estate clients and certain of the firm's real
estate debt and principal activities. He joined Kidder, Peabody in 1985 and,
beginning in 1989, was one of the senior executives responsible for building
Kidder, Peabody's real estate department. Mr. Fancher previously worked for a
major law firm in New York City. He has a J.D. from Harvard Law School, an
M.B.A. from Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration and an A.B. from
Harvard College.
Walter V. Arnold is a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Managing General Partner and a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Adviser which he joined in October 1985. Mr. Arnold joined PWI in
1983 with the acquisition of Rotan Mosle, Inc. where he had been First Vice
President and Controller since 1978, and where he continued until joining the
Adviser. Mr. Arnold is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in the state of
Texas.
David F. Brooks is a First Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of the
Managing General Partner and a First Vice President and an Assistant Treasurer
of the Adviser. Mr. Brooks joined the Adviser in March 1980. From 1972 to 1980,
Mr. Brooks was an Assistant Treasurer of Property Capital Advisors, Inc. and
also, from March 1974 to February 1980, the Assistant Treasurer of Capital for
Real Estate, which provided real estate investment, asset management and
consulting services.
<PAGE>
Thomas W. Boland is a Vice President and Controller of the Managing General
Partner and a Vice President and Controller of the Adviser which he joined in
1988. From 1984 to 1987, Mr. Boland was associated with Arthur Young & Company.
Mr. Boland is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in the state of
Massachusetts. He holds a B.S. in Accounting from Merrimack College and an
M.B.A. from Boston University.
(f) None of the directors and officers were involved in legal proceedings
which are material to an evaluation of his or her ability or integrity as a
director or officer.
(g) Compliance With Exchange Act Filing Requirements: The Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 requires the officers and directors of the Managing General
Partner, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Partnership's limited
partnership units, to file certain reports of ownership and changes in ownership
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and ten-percent
beneficial holders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Partnership
with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, the
Partnership believes that, during the year ended September 30, 1999, all filing
requirements applicable to the officers and directors of the Managing General
Partner and ten-percent beneficial holders were complied with.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The directors and officers of the Partnership's Managing General Partner
receive no direct remuneration from the Partnership. The Partnership is required
to pay certain fees to the Adviser, and the General Partners are entitled to
receive a share of Partnership cash distributions and a share of profits and
losses. These items are described under Item 13.
Regular quarterly distributions to the Partnership's Unitholders were
suspended from fiscal 1991 through the first half of fiscal 1994. Distributions
were reinstated at an annual rate of 2% on original invested capital effective
for the third quarter of fiscal 1994. During fiscal 1997, the distribution rate
was increased to 3.6% on remaining invested capital effective for the second
quarter of fiscal 1997 and to 3.63% on remaining invested capital effective for
the third quarter of fiscal 1997. Distributions remained at that level through
the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Because of the reduction in distributable cash
flow received by the Partnership as a result of the sale of the Hurstbourne
Apartments, the annual distribution rate was reduced to 2.5% for the quarter
ended March 31, 1999. However, the Partnership's Units of Limited Partnership
Interest are not actively traded on any organized exchange, and no efficient
secondary market exists. Accordingly, no accurate price information is available
for these Units. Therefore, a presentation of historical Unitholder total
returns would not be meaningful.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
(a) The Partnership is a limited partnership issuing Units of limited
partnership interest, not voting securities. All the outstanding stock of the
Managing General Partner, Sixth Income Properties Fund, Inc., is owned by
PaineWebber. Properties Associates 1985, L.P., the Associate General Partner, is
a Virginia limited partnership, certain limited partners of which are also
officers of the Adviser and the Managing General Partner. No limited partner is
known by the Partnership to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding
interests of the Partnership.
(b) The directors and officers of the Managing General Partner do not
directly own any Units of limited partnership interest of the Partnership. No
director or officer of the Managing General Partner, nor any limited partner of
the Associate General Partner, possesses a right to acquire beneficial ownership
of Units of limited partnership interest of the Partnership.
(c) There exists no arrangement, known to the Partnership, the operation
of which may, at a subsequent date, result in a change in control of the
Partnership.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The General Partners of the Partnership are Sixth Income Properties Fund,
Inc. (the "Managing General Partner"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PaineWebber
Group, Inc. ("PaineWebber") and Properties Associates 1985, L.P. (the "Associate
General Partner"), a Virginia limited partnership, certain limited partners of
which are also officers of the Managing General Partner and PaineWebber
Properties Incorporated (the "Adviser"). Subject to the Managing General
Partner's overall authority, the business of the Partnership is managed by the
Adviser pursuant to an advisory contract. The Adviser is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of PaineWebber Incorporated ("PWI"). The General Partners, the
Adviser and PWI receive fees and compensation, determined on an agreed-upon
basis, in consideration of various services performed in connection with the
sale of the Units, the management of the Partnership and the acquisition,
management, financing and disposition of Partnership investments.
In connection with the acquisition of properties, the Adviser received
acquisition fees in an amount equal to 5% of the gross proceeds from the sale of
the Partnership Units. In connection with the sale of each property, the Adviser
may receive a disposition fee, payable upon liquidation of the Partnership, in
an amount equal to the lesser of 1% of the aggregate sales price of the property
or 50% of the standard brokerage commissions, subordinated to the payment of
certain amounts to the Limited Partners.
All taxable income or tax loss (other than from a Capital Transaction) of
the Partnership will be allocated 98.94802625% to the Limited Partners and
1.05197375% to the General Partners. Taxable income or loss arising from a sale
or refinancing of investment properties will be allocated to the Limited
Partners and the General Partners in proportion to the amounts of sale or
refinancing proceeds to which they are entitled; provided, that the General
Partners shall be allocated at least 1% of taxable income arising from a sale or
refinancing. If there are no sale or refinancing proceeds, taxable income or tax
loss from a sale or refinancing will be allocated 98.94802625% to the Limited
Partners and 1.05197375% to the General Partners. Notwithstanding this, the
Partnership Agreement provides that the allocation of taxable income and tax
losses arising from the sale of a property which leads to the dissolution of the
Partnership shall be adjusted to the extent feasible so that neither the General
or Limited Partners recognize any gain or loss as a result of having either a
positive or negative balance remaining in their capital accounts upon the
dissolution of the Partnership. If the General Partner has a negative capital
account balance subsequent to the sale of a property which leads to the
dissolution of the Partnership, the General Partner may be obligated to restore
a portion of such negative capital account balance as determined in accordance
with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. Allocations of the
Partnership's operations between the General Partners and the Limited Partners
for financial accounting purposes have been made in conformity with the
allocations of taxable income or tax loss.
All distributable cash, as defined, for each fiscal year shall be
distributed quarterly in the ratio of 95% to the Limited Partners, 1.01% to the
General Partners and 3.99% to the Adviser, as an asset management fee. All sale
or refinancing proceeds shall be distributed in varying proportions to the
Limited and General Partners, as specified in the Partnership Agreement.
Under the advisory contract, the Adviser has specific management
responsibilities: to administer day-to-day operations of the Partnership, and to
report periodically the performance of the Partnership to the Managing General
Partner. The Adviser will be paid a basic management fee (3% of adjusted cash
flow, as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and an incentive management fee
(2% of adjusted cash flow subordinated to a noncumulative annual return to the
Limited Partners equal to 6% based upon their adjusted capital contributions),
in addition to the asset management fee described above, for services rendered.
The Adviser earned total basic and asset management fees of $113,000 for the
year ended September 30, 1999. No incentive management fees were earned during
fiscal 1999.
An affiliate of the Managing General Partner performs certain accounting,
tax preparation, securities law compliance and investor communications and
relations services for the Partnership. The total costs incurred by this
affiliate in providing such services are allocated among several entities,
including the Partnership. Included in general and administrative expenses for
the year ended September 30, 1999 is $115,000, representing reimbursements to
this affiliate for providing such services to the Partnership.
The Partnership uses the services of Mitchell Hutchins Institutional
Investors, Inc. ("Mitchell Hutchins") for the managing of cash assets. Mitchell
Hutchins is a subsidiary of Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management, Inc., an
independently operated subsidiary of PaineWebber. Mitchell Hutchins earned fees
of $12,000 (included in general and administrative expenses) for managing the
Partnership's cash assets during the year ended September 30, 1999. Fees charged
by Mitchell Hutchins are based on a percentage of invested cash reserves which
varies based on the total amount of invested cash which Mitchell Hutchins
manages on behalf of PWPI.
<PAGE>
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Schedules:
The response to this portion of Item 14 is submitted as a
separate section of this report. See Index to Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedules at page F-1.
(3) Exhibits:
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits at
page IV-3 are filed as part of this Report.
(b) A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed on September 30, 1999
reporting the sale of the Regent's Walk Apartments and is hereby
incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Exhibits
See (a)(3) above.
(d) Financial Statement Schedules
The response to this portion of Item 14 is submitted as a
separate section of this report. See Index to Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedules at page F-1.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Partnership has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: Sixth Income Properties Fund, Inc.
---------------------------------
Managing General Partner
By: /s/ Bruce J. Rubin
------------------
Bruce J. Rubin
President and Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ Walter V. Arnold
-------------------
Walter V. Arnold
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
By: /s/ Thomas W. Boland
--------------------
Thomas W. Boland
Vice President and Controller
Dated: December 29, 1999
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Partnership in
the capacity and on the dates indicated.
By:/s/ Bruce J. Rubin Date: December 29, 1999
----------------------- -----------------
Bruce J. Rubin
Director
By:/s/ Terrence E. Fancher Date: December 29, 1999
----------------------- -----------------
Terrence E. Fancher
Director
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Item 14(a)(3)
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<CAPTION>
Page Number in the Report
Exhibit No. Description of Document or Other Reference
- ----------- ----------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(3) and (4) Prospectus of the Registrant Filed with the Commission
dated September 17, 1984, supplemented, pursuant to Rule 424(c)
with particular reference to the and incorporated herein by
Restated Certificate and Agreement reference.
Limited Partnership.
(10) Material contracts previously filed as Filed with the Commission
exhibits to registration statements and pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
amendments thereto of the registrant of the Securities Exchange Act
together with all such contracts filed of 1934 and incorporated
as exhibits of previously filed Forms herein by reference.
8-K and Forms 10-K are hereby
incorporated herein by reference.
(13) Annual Reports to Limited Partners No Annual Report for the year
ended September 30, 1999 has been
sent to the Limited Partners.
An Annual Report will be sent to
the Limited Partners subsequent to
this filing.
(21) List of Subsidiaries Included in Item 1 of Part I of
this Report Page I-1, to which
reference is hereby made.
(27) Financial Data Schedule Filed as last page of EDGAR
submission following the Financial
Statements and Financial
Statement Schedule required by
Item 14.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Item 14(a) (1) and (2) and 14(d)
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Reference
---------
Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership:
Report of independent auditors F-2
Balance sheets as of September 30, 1999 and 1998 F-3
Statements of income for the years ended September 30, 1999,
1998 and 1997 F-4
Statements of changes in partners' capital (deficit) for the
years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 F-5
Statements of cash flows for the years ended September 30, 1999,
1998 and 1997 F-6
Notes to financial statements F-7
Combined Joint Ventures of Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited
Partnership:
Report of independent auditors F-17
Combined balance sheets as of September 30, 1999 and 1998 F-18
Combined statements of income and changes in ventures' capital
for the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 F-19
Combined statements of cash flows for the years ended
September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 F-20
Notes to combined financial statements F-21
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation F-29
Other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not
present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the
schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial
statements, including the notes thereto.
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Partners of
Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Paine Webber Income
Properties Six Limited Partnership as of September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the
related statements of income, changes in partners' capital (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1999. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Paine Webber Income
Properties Six Limited Partnership at September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended September 30, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
-----------------
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 10, 1999
<PAGE>
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, 1999 and 1998
(In thousands, except per Unit amounts)
ASSETS
1999 1998
---- ----
Investments in joint ventures, at equity $ - $ 3,434
Cash and cash equivalents 12,665 1,344
Accounts receivable - affiliates 879 -
-------- ---------
$ 13,544 $ 4,778
======== =========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Losses of joint ventures in excess of
investments and advances $ 765 $ -
Accounts payable - affiliates 13 16
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 21 27
-------- ---------
Total liabilities 799 43
Partners' capital:
General Partners:
Capital contributions 1 1
Cumulative net loss (617) (816)
Cumulative cash distributions (571) (552)
Limited Partners ($1,000 per unit; 60,000
Units issued):
Capital contributions, net of offering costs 53,959 53,959
Cumulative net loss (8,772) (27,563)
Cumulative cash distributions (31,255) (20,294)
-------- ---------
Total partners' capital 12,745 4,735
-------- ---------
$ 13,544 $ 4,778
======== =========
See accompanying notes.
<PAGE>
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
(In thousands, except per Unit amounts)
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Revenues:
Interest and other income $ 445 $ 106 $ 237
Expenses:
Management fees 113 155 121
General and administrative 334 252 264
------- ------- -------
447 407 385
------- ------- -------
Operating loss (2) (301) (148)
Partnership's share of gains on sales
of operating investment properties 18,496 - -
Partnership's share of ventures' income 496 1,128 1,263
------- ------- -------
Net income $18,990 $ 827 $ 1,115
======= ======= =======
Per Limited Partnership Unit:
Net income $313.18 $ 13.64 $ 18.40
======= ======= =======
Cash distributions $182.68 $ 35.08 $ 61.46
======= ======= =======
The above per Limited Partnership Unit information is based upon the 60,000
Limited Partnership Units outstanding during each year.
See accompanying notes.
<PAGE>
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
For the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
(In thousands)
General Limited
Partners Partners Total
-------- -------- -----
Balance at September 30, 1996 $ (1,347) $ 9,971 $ 8,624
Cash distributions (17) (3,687) (3,704)
Net income 11 1,104 1,115
-------- -------- --------
Balance at September 30, 1997 (1,353) 7,388 $ 6,035
Cash distributions (22) (2,105) (2,127)
Net income 8 819 827
-------- -------- --------
Balance at September 30, 1998 (1,367) 6,102 4,735
Cash distributions (19) (10,961) (10,980)
Net income 199 18,791 18,990
-------- -------- --------
Balance at September 30, 1999 $ (1,187) $ 13,932 $ 12,745
======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes.
<PAGE>
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(In thousands)
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 18,990 $ 827 $ 1,115
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash used in operating activities:
Partnership's share of gain on sale
of operating investment properties (18,496) - -
Partnership's share of ventures' income (496) (1,128) (1,263)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable - affiliates (3) - 6
Accrued expenses and other liabilities (6) (23) 26
-------- ------- --------
Total adjustments (19,001) (1,151) (1,231)
-------- ------- --------
Net cash used in operating activities (11) (324) (116)
-------- ------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Distributions from joint ventures 22,410 1,877 2,520
Cash contributions to joint ventures (98) - -
-------- ------- --------
Net cash provided by investing
activities 22,312 1,877 2,520
-------- ------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to partners (10,980) (2,127) (3,704)
-------- ------- --------
Net cash used in financing
activities (10,980) (2,127) (3,704)
-------- ------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents 11,321 (574) (1,300)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 1,344 1,918 3,218
-------- ------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 12,665 $ 1,344 $ 1,918
======== ======= ========
See accompanying notes.
<PAGE>
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Organization and Nature of Operations
-------------------------------------
Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership (the "Partnership")
is a limited partnership organized pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware
in April 1984 for the purpose of investing in a diversified portfolio of
income-producing properties. The Partnership authorized the issuance of units
(the "Units") of partnership interests (at $1,000 per Unit) of which 60,000 were
subscribed and issued between September 17, 1984 and September 16, 1985.
The Partnership originally invested the net proceeds of the public
offering, through joint venture partnerships, in five operating properties,
comprised of two multi-family apartment complexes, two commercial office
buildings and one retail shopping center. The sale of the Partnership's
remaining interest in the 150 Broadway Office Building was finalized during
fiscal 1996. In addition, during fiscal 1992 the Partnership forfeited its
interest in the other office building, Northbridge Office Centre, as a result of
certain defaults under the terms of the property's mortgage indebtedness. The
mortgage lender took title to the Northbridge property through foreclosure
proceedings on April 20, 1992, after a protracted period of negotiations failed
to produce a mutually acceptable restructuring agreement. Furthermore, the
Partnership's efforts to recapitalize, sell or refinance the Northbridge
property were unsuccessful. As discussed further in Note 4, the two multi-family
properties were sold during fiscal 1999. On November 16, 1998,
Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates, a joint venture in which the Partnership had an
interest, sold its operating investment property, the Hurstbourne Apartments. On
September 30, 1999, Regent's Walk Associates, a joint venture in which the
Partnership had an interest, sold its operating investment property, the
Regent's Walk Apartments. The Partnership's one remaining investment is also
described in Note 4.
The Partnership is currently focusing on potential disposition strategies
for the one remaining investment in its portfolio. Upon the sale of the
Partnership's Mall Corners Shopping Center investment, an orderly liquidation of
the Partnership would follow. However, in light of the current leasing status of
the property (see Note 4), a liquidation of the Partnership will not be
completed until the first half of calendar year 2000 at the earliest.
Furthermore, there are no assurances that a sale of the Mall Corners investment
and a liquidation of the Partnership will be completed within this time frame.
2. Use of Estimates and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
---------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the accrual
basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities as of September 30, 1999 and 1998 and revenues and expenses for
each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1999. Actual results
could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
The accompanying financial statements include the Partnership's
investments in certain joint venture partnerships which own operating
properties. The Partnership accounts for its investments in joint venture
partnerships using the equity method because the Partnership does not have a
voting control interest in the ventures. Under the equity method the venture is
carried at cost adjusted for the Partnership's share of the venture's earnings
or losses and distributions.
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include
all highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less.
The cash and cash equivalents appearing on the accompanying balance sheets
represent financial instruments for purposes of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments." The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates
their fair value as of September 30, 1999 and 1998 due to the short-term
maturities of these instruments.
No provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial
statements as the liability for such taxes is that of the partners rather than
the Partnership. Upon sale or disposition of the Partnership's investments, the
taxable gain or the taxable loss incurred will be allocated among the partners.
The principal differences between the Partnership's accounting on a federal
income tax basis and the accompanying financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) relate to the
methods used to determine the depreciation expense on the unconsolidated
operating investment properties and the treatment of the sale of the
Partnership's second mortgage interest in the 150 Broadway investment during
fiscal 1996.
3. The Partnership Agreement and Related Party Transactions
--------------------------------------------------------
The General Partners of the Partnership are Sixth Income Properties Fund,
Inc. (the "Managing General Partner"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PaineWebber
Group, Inc. ("PaineWebber") and Properties Associates 1985, L.P. (the "Associate
General Partner"), a Virginia limited partnership, certain limited partners of
which are also officers of the Managing General Partner and PaineWebber
Properties Incorporated (the "Adviser"). Subject to the Managing General
Partner's overall authority, the business of the Partnership is managed by the
Adviser pursuant to an advisory contract. The Adviser is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of PaineWebber Incorporated ("PWI"). The General Partners, the
Adviser and PWI receive fees and compensation, determined on an agreed-upon
basis, in consideration of various services performed in connection with the
sale of the Units, the management of the Partnership and the acquisition,
management, financing and disposition of Partnership investments.
In connection with the acquisition of properties, the Adviser received
acquisition fees in an amount equal to 5% of the gross proceeds from the sale of
the Partnership Units. In connection with the sale of each property, the Adviser
may receive a disposition fee, payable upon liquidation of the Partnership, in
an amount equal to the lesser of 1% of the aggregate sales price of the property
or 50% of the standard brokerage commissions, subordinated to the payment of
certain amounts to the Limited Partners.
All taxable income or tax loss (other than from a Capital Transaction) of
the Partnership will be allocated 98.94802625% to the Limited Partners and
1.05197375% to the General Partners. Taxable income or loss arising from a sale
or refinancing of investment properties will be allocated to the Limited
Partners and the General Partners in proportion to the amounts of sale or
refinancing proceeds to which they are entitled; provided, that the General
Partners shall be allocated at least 1% of taxable income arising from a sale or
refinancing. If there are no sale or refinancing proceeds, taxable income or tax
loss from a sale or refinancing will be allocated 98.94802625% to the Limited
Partners and 1.05197375% to the General Partners. Notwithstanding this, the
Partnership Agreement provides that the allocation of taxable income and tax
losses arising from the sale of a property which leads to the dissolution of the
Partnership shall be adjusted to the extent feasible so that neither the General
or Limited Partners recognize any gain or loss as a result of having either a
positive or negative balance remaining in their capital accounts upon the
dissolution of the Partnership. If the General Partner has a negative capital
account balance subsequent to the sale of a property which leads to the
dissolution of the Partnership, the General Partner may be obligated to restore
a portion of such negative capital account balance as determined in accordance
with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. Allocations of the
Partnership's operations between the General Partners and the Limited Partners
for financial accounting purposes have been made in conformity with the
allocations of taxable income or tax loss.
All distributable cash, as defined, for each fiscal year shall be
distributed quarterly in the ratio of 95% to the Limited Partners, 1.01% to the
General Partners and 3.99% to the Adviser, as an asset management fee. All sale
or refinancing proceeds shall be distributed in varying proportions to the
Limited and General Partners, as specified in the Partnership Agreement.
Under the advisory contract, the Adviser has specific management
responsibilities: to administer day-to-day operations of the Partnership, and to
report periodically the performance of the Partnership to the Managing General
Partner. The Adviser will be paid a basic management fee (3% of adjusted cash
flow, as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and an incentive management fee
(2% of adjusted cash flow subordinated to a noncumulative annual return to the
Limited Partners equal to 6% based upon their adjusted capital contributions),
in addition to the asset management fee described above, for services rendered.
The Adviser earned total basic and asset management fees of $113,000, $155,000
and $121,000 for the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997,
respectively. No incentive management fees have been earned to date. Accounts
payable - affiliates at September 30, 1999 and 1998 consist of management fees
payable to the Adviser.
Included in general and administrative expenses for the years ended
September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 is $115,000, $111,000 and $111,000,
respectively, representing reimbursements to an affiliate of the Managing
General Partner for providing certain financial, accounting and investor
communication services to the Partnership.
The Partnership uses the services of Mitchell Hutchins Institutional
Investors, Inc. ("Mitchell Hutchins") for the managing of cash assets. Mitchell
Hutchins is a subsidiary of Mitchell Hutchins Asset Management, Inc., an
independently operated subsidiary of PaineWebber. Mitchell Hutchins earned fees
of $12,000, $6,000 and $9,000 (included in general and administrative expenses)
for managing the Partnership's cash assets during fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997,
respectively.
Accounts receivable - affiliates at September 30, 1999 represents the
Partnership's remaining share of the net sale proceeds and operating cash flow
to be received from Regent's Walk Associates subsequent to the sale of the
Regent's Walk Apartments (see Note 4). Such amount was received subsequent to
year-end.
4. Investments in Joint Ventures
-----------------------------
The Partnership has an investment in one remaining joint venture which
owns an operating investment property at September 30, 1999 (three at September
30, 1998). As discussed further below, the operating investment properties owned
by the Hurstbourne and Regent's Walk joint ventures were sold on November 16,
1998 and September 30, 1999, respectively. The joint ventures are accounted for
on the equity method in the Partnership's financial statements.
Condensed combined financial statements of these joint ventures follow:
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets
September 30, 1999 and 1998
(In thousands)
Assets
1999 1998
---- ----
Current assets $ 1,303 $ 2,260
Operating investment properties, net 19,360 41,414
Other assets 731 973
-------- --------
$ 21,394 $ 44,647
======== ========
Liabilities and Venturers' Capital (Deficit)
Current liabilities $ 1,389 $ 11,379
Other liabilities 94 280
Long-term debt 17,554 26,775
Partnership's share of combined capital
(deficit) (817) 2,742
Co-venturers' share of combined capital
(deficit) 3,174 3,471
-------- --------
$ 21,394 $ 44,647
======== ========
Reconciliation of Partnership's Investment
(in thousands)
1999 1998
---- ----
Partnership's share of capital (deficit),
as shown above $ (817) $ 2,742
Partnership's share of current
liabilities and long-term debt 52 692
-------- --------
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures,
at equity $ (765) $ 3,434
======== ========
Condensed Combined Summary of Operations
For the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
(In thousands)
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Rental revenues and
expense recoveries $ 7,332 $ 9,833 $ 9,648
Interest income 66 54 96
------- ------- -------
7,398 9,887 9,744
Property operating expenses 2,575 3,578 3,213
Depreciation and amortization 2,033 2,444 2,423
Interest expense 2,294 2,737 2,802
------- ------- -------
6,902 8,759 8,438
------- ------- -------
Operating income 496 1,128 1,306
Gain on sales of operating
investment properties 19,530 - -
------- ------- -------
Net income $20,026 $ 1,128 $ 1,306
======= ======= =======
Partnership's share of
combined income $18,992 $ 1,128 $ 1,306
Co-venturers' share of
combined income 1,034 - -
------- ------- -------
$20,026 $ 1,128 $ 1,306
======= ======= =======
<PAGE>
Reconciliation of Partnership's Share of Operations
(in thousands)
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Partnership's share of combined
income, as shown above $18,992 $ 1,128 $ 1,306
Amortization of excess basis - - (43)
------- ------- -------
Partnership's share of unconsolidated
ventures' net income $18,992 $ 1,128 $ 1,263
======= ======= =======
The Partnership's share of ventures' net income is presented as follows in
the accompanying statements of operations (in thousands):
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Partnership's share of ventures' income $ 496 $ 1,128 $ 1,263
Partnership's share of gain on sales of
operating investment properties 18,496 - -
------- ------- -------
$18,992 $ 1,128 $ 1,263
======= ======= =======
Investments in joint ventures, at equity, represents the Partnership's net
investment in the joint venture partnerships. These joint ventures are subject
to partnership agreements which determine the distribution of available funds,
the disposition of the venture's assets and the rights of the partners,
regardless of the Partnership's percentage ownership interest in the venture.
Substantially all of the Partnership's investments in these joint ventures are
restricted as to distributions.
Investments in joint ventures, at equity, on the accompanying balance
sheets is comprised of the following joint venture investment carrying amounts
(in thousands):
1999 1998
---- ----
Regent's Walk Associates $ - $ 253
Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates - 3,686
Gwinnett Mall Corners Associates (765) (505)
------- -------
$ (765) $ 3,434
======= =======
The Partnership received cash distributions from the joint ventures as set
forth below (in thousands):
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Regent's Walk Associates $ 7,759 $ 406 $ 635
Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates 13,376 674 518
Gwinnett Mall Corners Associates 1,275 797 1,367
------- ------- -------
$22,410 $ 1,877 $ 2,520
======= ======= =======
Descriptions of the properties owned by the joint ventures and the terms
of the joint venture agreements are summarized as follows:
a. Regent's Walk Associates
------------------------
On May 15, 1985, the Partnership acquired an interest in Regent's Walk
Associates, a Kansas general partnership that owned and operated Regent's Walk
Apartments, a 255-unit apartment complex in Overland Park, Johnson County,
Kansas. The Partnership was a general partner in the joint venture. The
Partnership's co-venture partner was an affiliate of J. A. Peterson Enterprises,
Inc. The initial aggregate cash investment by the Partnership for its interest
was approximately $6,768,000 (including an acquisition fee of $390,000 paid to
the Adviser). The property was encumbered by a nonrecourse first mortgage loan
with an initial principal balance of $9,000,000 secured by the operating
investment property. The note required monthly payments, including interest at
7.32%, with an unpaid principal balance of $8,500,163 due October 1, 2000.
On September 30, 1999, Regent's Walk Associates sold the Regent's Walk
Apartments to an affiliate of the Partnership's joint venture partner for $17.75
million. The sale generated net proceeds of approximately $8,068,000, after the
assumption of the outstanding first mortgage loan of approximately $8,624,000,
accrued interest of approximately $51,000, closing proration adjustments of
approximately $189,000, and a payment of approximately $818,000 to the
Partnership's non-affiliated co-venture partner for its share of the net
proceeds in accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement. In
addition, as a result of the Regent's Walk sale, the Partnership received
$117,000 which had been held in escrow at the property plus $257,000 as a result
of operations of the property through the date of sale. The Partnership made a
special distribution to the Limited Partners of $9,180,000, or $153 per original
$1,000 investment, on October 15, 1999 to Unitholders of record on the September
30, 1999 sale date. Of the $153.00 total, $140.30 resulted from the sale of
Regent's Walk and $12.70 was from Partnership reserves that exceed expected
future requirements. As previously reported, the Partnership had entered into
negotiations with its Regent's Walk Apartments co-venture partner for a sale of
the property during the third quarter of fiscal 1999. On May 19, 1999, the
Partnership negotiated a purchase and sale agreement with an affiliate of the
co-venturer to sell the property for what the Partnership believes was a very
favorable price of $17,750,000. The prospective buyer subsequently made
non-refundable deposits totalling $1,250,000. The only contingency was for
approval by the lender for an assumption of the first mortgage loan as part of
the sale transaction. The joint venture subsequently received this approval and
the sale closed on September 30, 1999. The sale of the Regent's Walk Apartments
resulted in a gain of $8,268,000 at the joint venture level for financial
reporting purposes in fiscal 1999. The Partnership was allocated 100% of this
gain in accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement.
The joint venture agreement provided that the Partnership would receive
from cash flow a cumulative preferred return, payable quarterly, of $164,000.
Commencing June 1, 1988, after the Partnership had received its cumulative
preferred return, the co-venturer was entitled to a preference return of $7,000
for each fiscal quarter which was cumulative only for amounts due in any one
fiscal year. Any remaining cash flow was to be used to pay interest on any notes
from the joint venture to the partners and then was to be distributed to the
partners, with the Partnership receiving 90% of the first $200,000, 80% of the
next $200,000 and 70% of any remainder.
Taxable income or tax loss was to be allocated to the partners based on
their proportionate share of cash distributions. Allocations of the venture's
operations between the Partnership and the co-venturer for financial accounting
purposes were made in conformity with the allocations of taxable income or tax
loss.
If additional cash was needed by the joint venture for any reason
including payment of the Partnership's preference return, prior to June 1, 1992,
the co-venturer was required to make loans to the joint venture up to a total of
$250,000. After the joint venture had borrowed $250,000 from the co-venturer, if
the joint venture required additional funds for purposes other than
distributions, then it was to be provided 90% by the Partnership and 10% by the
co-venturer. As of September 30, 1998, the joint venture had loans payable to
the co-venturer and the Partnership aggregating $264,882 and $133,943,
respectively.
Sale and/or refinancing proceeds were to be distributed as follows, after
making a provision for liabilities and obligations: (1) repayment to the
co-venturer of up to $250,000 of operating loans plus accrued interest thereon,
(2) payment of accrued interest and repayment of principal of operating notes
(pro-rata), (3) to the Partnership, payment of any preferred return arrearage,
(4) to the Partnership, an amount equal to the Partnership's gross investment
plus $560,000, (5) to the co-venturer, the amount of $500,000, (6) to payment of
a brokers fee to the partners if a sale was made to a third party, (7) to the
payment of up to $100,000 of subordinated management fees, (8) the next
$8,000,000 to the Partnership and the co-venturer in the proportions of 90% and
10%, respectively, (9) the next $4,000,000 to the Partnership and the
co-venturer in the proportions of 80% and 20%, respectively, and (10) any
remaining balance 70% to the Partnership and 30% to the co-venturer.
The joint venture had entered into a property management contract with an
affiliate of the co-venturer, cancellable at the option of the Partnership upon
the occurrence of certain events. The management fee was 4% of the gross rents
collected from the property until June 1, 1990 when the fee increased to 5% of
the gross rents. Subsequent to June 1, 1988, that portion of the fees
representing 1% of gross rents was to be payable only to the extent of cash flow
remaining after the Partnership had received its preferred return. Any payments
not made pursuant to the above were payable only out of sale or refinancing
proceeds and were limited to a maximum of $100,000, as specified in the
agreement. Total subordinated management fees as of September 30, 1998 exceeded
this $100,000 limitation. Effective October 1, 1997, the management fee was
reduced to 2.5%, all of which was payable as earned.
b. Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates
-------------------------------
On July 25, 1985, the Partnership acquired an interest in
Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates, a Delaware general partnership that owned and
operated Hurstbourne Apartments, a 409-unit apartment complex located in
Louisville, Kentucky. The Partnership was a general partner in the joint
venture. The Partnership's co-venture partner was an affiliate of the Paragon
Group. The initial aggregate cash investment by the Partnership for its interest
was approximately $8,716,000 (including an acquisition fee of $500,000 paid to
the Adviser). The property was encumbered by a nonrecourse first mortgage loan
with a balance of $8,144,000 as of September 30, 1998. This mortgage loan was
scheduled to mature in September 1999.
During the first quarter of fiscal 1999, on November 16, 1998,
Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates sold the Hurstbourne Apartments to an unrelated
party for $22.9 million. The sale generated net proceeds of approximately
$12,941,000 to the Partnership after the repayment of the outstanding first
mortgage loan of approximately $8,124,000, accrued interest of approximately
$30,000, a prepayment penalty of $187,000, closing proration adjustments of
approximately $380,000, closing costs of approximately $266,000 and a payment of
approximately $972,000 to the Partnership's co-venture partner for its share of
the net proceeds in accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement. As
a result of the sale of the Hurstbourne property, the Partnership made a special
distribution of $9,300,000, or $155 per original $1,000 Unit, to the Limited
Partners on December 15, 1998. Approximately $3,641,000 of the Hurstbourne net
sale proceeds were retained and added to the Partnership's cash reserves to
ensure that the Partnership has sufficient capital resources to fund its share
of potential capital improvement expenses at the Mall Corners Shopping Center.
The sale of the Hurstbourne property resulted in a gain of $11,262,000 at the
joint venture level for financial reporting purposes in fiscal 1999. The
Partnership's share of such gain was $10,228,000.
Taxable income or tax loss of the joint venture was to be allocated to the
Partnership and co-venturer in proportion to the distribution of net cash flow
subject to the following: first, the co-venturer was not to be allocated less
than 10% of the net income or net loss; second, the co-venturer was not to be
allocated net profits in excess of net cash flow distributed to it during the
fiscal year. Internal Revenue Service regulations require partnership
allocations of income and loss to the respective partners to have "substantial
economic effect". This requirement resulted in the venture's income and losses
for certain years being allocated in a manner different from that provided in
the venture agreement such that none of the losses were allocated to the
co-venturer. Allocations of the venture's operations between the Partnership and
the co-venturer for financial accounting purposes were made in conformity with
the actual allocation of taxable income or tax loss.
Any proceeds arising from a refinancing, sale, exchange or other
disposition of property were to be distributed first to the payment of unpaid
principal and accrued interest on the outstanding first mortgage loan. Any
remaining proceeds were to be distributed in the following order: repayment of
unpaid operating loans and accrued interest thereon to the Partnership and the
co-venturer; the amount of any undistributed preference payments to the
Partnership for the period through July 31, 1989 ($1,354,000); $10,056,000 to
the Partnership; $684,000 to the co-venturer; the amount of any unpaid
subordinated management fees to the property manager ($118,000); $9,000,000
distributed 90% to the Partnership and 10% to the co-venturer; $4,500,000
distributed 80% to the Partnership and 20% to the co-venturer with any remaining
balance distributed 70% to the Partnership and 30% to the co-venturer.
c. Gwinnett Mall Corners Associates
--------------------------------
On August 28, 1985, the Partnership acquired an interest in Gwinnett Mall
Corners Associates, a Georgia general partnership that owns and operates Mall
Corners Shopping Center, a 304,000 gross leasable square foot shopping center,
located in Gwinnett County, Georgia. The Partnership is a general partner in the
joint venture. The Partnership's co-venture partner is a partnership comprised
of several individual investors. The Mall Corners property was 73% leased and
occupied as of September 30, 1999, as compared to 97% leased as of September 30,
1998. The 73% occupancy level reflects the vacancy for a former anchor tenant,
Levitz Furniture, which represented 16% of the Center's leasable area, a former
movie theater that occupied 8% of the leasable area and four stores that
represent 3% of the leasable area. As discussed in Note 1, the Partnership is
examining potential disposition strategies for Mall Corners. However, the
Partnership's co-venture partner believes that it could be desirable from its
perspective to re-lease all of the currently vacant space at the Center before
selling the property. As a result, the Partnership is currently exploring its
strategic alternatives which include exercising its rights of first offer under
the joint venture agreement.
The initial aggregate cash investment by the Partnership for its interest
was approximately $10,707,000 (including an acquisition fee of $579,000 paid to
the Adviser). The shopping center was encumbered by a construction mortgage loan
with a balance of $22,669,000 at the time of closing. The construction mortgage
loan was refinanced on November 4, 1985 with permanent financing of $17,700,000,
with the remainder paid out of escrows established at the time of closing. On
December 29, 1995, the venture obtained a new first mortgage loan with an
initial principal balance of $20,000,000 and repaid the balance of the 11.5%
nonrecourse permanent mortgage loan, which matured in December 1995. Excess loan
proceeds were used to pay transaction costs and to establish certain required
escrow deposits, including an amount of $1.7 million designated to pay for
certain planned improvements and an expansion of the shopping center which were
completed in 1996. The new loan has a 10-year term, bears interest at a rate of
approximately 7.4% per annum and requires monthly principal and interest
payments based on a 20-year amortization schedule.
The joint venture agreement provides that the Partnership will receive
from cash flow, as defined, an annual cumulative preferred return, payable
monthly, of $1,047,000. In the event cash flow, as defined, was insufficient to
pay the Partnership's preference return described above through November 1,
1990, the co-venturer was required to fund to the joint venture a monthly amount
equal to the difference between $68,000 (the guaranteed preferred return) and
cash flow, as defined. During 1990, the venture partners reached an agreement as
to the cumulative deficiencies to be funded by the co-venturer, which totalled
$665,000. Cumulative total preference distributions in arrears at September 30,
1999 amounted to $2,117,000, which includes minimum guaranteed distributions in
arrears of $427,000. The minimum guaranteed distributions are accrued in the
venture's financial statements. However, the remaining unpaid preference return
is payable only from future cash flow or sale or refinancing proceeds.
Accordingly, such amounts are not accrued in the venture's financial statements.
The co-venturer is entitled to receive quarterly non-cumulative,
subordinated returns of $38,000. Due to insufficient cash flow, the co-venturer
received no distributions for any of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 1999. Any remaining cash flow, as defined, after payments of the
co-venturer's preference return, shall be distributed first to the Initial
Property Manager (an affiliate of the co-venturer) in an amount equal to the
then unpaid subordinated management fees from prior fiscal years, then next to
pay accrued interest on any loans made by the Partnership and the co-venturer to
the joint venture. The next $500,000 is to be distributed 80% to the Partnership
and 20% to the co-venturer. The next $500,000 of cash flow in any year in excess
of such returns will be distributed 70% to the Partnership and 30% to the
co-venturer and the remaining balance is to be distributed 60% to the
Partnership and 40% to the co-venturer.
Taxable income or tax loss will be allocated to the Partnership and the
co-venturer in any year in the same proportions as the amount of cash
distributed to each of them and if no net cash flow has been distributed, 100%
to the Partnership. Allocations of the venture's operations between the
Partnership and the co-venturer for financial accounting purposes have been made
in conformity with the allocations of taxable income or tax loss.
If additional cash is required for any reason in connection with
operations of the Joint Venture, it will be provided 70% by the Partnership and
30% by the co-venturer (operating loans). The rate of interest on such loans
shall equal the lesser of the rate announced by the First National Bank of
Boston as its prime or the maximum rate of interest permitted by applicable law.
In the event a partner shall default in its obligation to make an operating
loan, the other partner may make all or part of the loan required to be made by
the defaulting partner (default loan). Each default loan shall provide for the
accrual of interest at the rate equal to the lesser of twice the operating loan
rate or the maximum rate of interest permitted by applicable law. There were no
operating/default loans outstanding at the end of fiscal 1999 or 1998.
Operating/default loans of $89,000 were required in fiscal years prior to 1991.
Such loans were repaid in fiscal 1997. Total interest incurred and expensed for
these loans amounted to 1,000 in fiscal year 1997.
Distribution of sale and/or refinancing proceeds are to be as follows,
after making a provision for liabilities and obligations and to the extent not
previously returned to each partner: (1) payment of accrued interest and
operating notes payable to partners; (2) to the Partnership, the aggregate
amount of the Partnership's Preference Return that shall not have been
distributed, (3) to the Partnership, an amount equal to the Partnership's gross
investment, (4) the next $2,000,000 to the co-venturer, (5) to the Initial
Property Manager for any unpaid subordinated management fee that shall have
accrued, (6) the next $4,000,000 allocated to the Partnership and to the
co-venturer in the proportions 80% and 20%, respectively, (7) the next
$3,000,000 allocated to the Partnership and the co-venturer in the proportions
70% and 30%, respectively, and (8) any remaining balance shall be allocated to
the Partnership and the co-venturer 70% and 30%, respectively, until the
Partnership receives an amount equal to all net losses allocated to the
Partnership for years through calendar 1989 in which the maximum Federal income
tax rate for individuals was less than 50% times a percentage equal to 50% minus
the weighted average maximum Federal income tax rate for individuals in effect
during such years plus a simple rate of return added to each year's amount equal
to 8% per annum. Thereafter, any remaining balance shall be distributed to the
Partnership and the co-venturer 60% and 40%, respectively.
The joint venture entered into a property management contract with a
former affiliate of the co-venturer, cancellable at the Partnership's option
upon the occurrence of certain events. The management fee is equal to 3% of the
gross receipts, as defined, of which 1.5% was subordinated to the payment of the
Partnership's minimum guaranteed distributions through November 1990.
5. Subsequent Event
----------------
On October 15, 1999, the Partnership distributed $9,180,000 of the
proceeds from the sale of the Regent's Walk property to the Limited Partners.
See Note 4 for a discussion of this transaction. On November 15, 1999, the
Partnership distributed $304,000 to the Limited Partners, $3,000 to the General
Partners and $13,000 to the Adviser as an asset management fee for the quarter
ended September 30, 1999.
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Partners of
Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of the Combined
Joint Ventures of Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership as of
September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related combined statements of income and
changes in venturers' capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended September 30, 1999. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements
and schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of the
Combined Joint Ventures of Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited
Partnership at September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the combined results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
--------------------
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 10, 1999
<PAGE>
COMBINED JOINT VENTURES OF
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, 1999 and 1998
(In thousands)
ASSETS
1999 1998
---- ----
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 457 $ 1,206
Prepaid expenses 19 21
Accounts receivable from tenants and others 58 475
Cash reserve for capital expenditures 689 351
Cash reserve for insurance and taxes 80 207
-------- --------
Total current assets 1,303 2,260
Cash reserve for tenant security deposits 31 28
Capital contributions receivable from
Mall Corners III 665 665
Operating investment properties, at cost:
Land 7,039 9,941
Buildings, improvements and equipment 24,344 56,960
-------- --------
31,383 66,901
Less accumulated depreciation (12,023) (25,487)
-------- --------
Net operating investment properties 19,360 41,414
Deferred expenses, net of accumulated
amortization of $2,649 in 1999 and $3,342 in 1998 35 280
-------- --------
$ 21,394 $ 44,647
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND VENTURERS' CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Distributions payable to venturers $ 427 $ 558
Notes payable to venturers - 399
Current portion of long-term debt 597 8,805
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 160 551
Accounts payable - affiliate - 25
Accrued interest 115 634
Accrued real estate taxes - 182
Other liabilities 90 225
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 1,389 11,379
Long-term debt 17,554 26,775
Tenant security deposits 94 280
Venturers' capital 2,357 6,213
-------- --------
$ 21,394 $ 44,647
======== ========
See accompanying notes.
<PAGE>
COMBINED JOINT VENTURES OF
PAINEWEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CHANGES IN VENTURERS' CAPITAL
For the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
(In thousands)
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Revenues:
Rental income and expense reimbursements $ 7,332 $ 9,833 $ 9,648
Interest income 66 54 96
-------- -------- --------
7,398 9,887 9,744
Expenses:
Interest 2,294 2,737 2,802
Depreciation 1,703 2,190 2,178
Property taxes 447 620 575
Insurance 68 110 110
Management fees 188 255 353
Maintenance and repairs 685 1,162 717
Utilities 347 582 594
General and administrative 232 218 246
Salaries 285 600 584
Amortization 330 253 245
Other 323 32 34
-------- -------- --------
6,902 8,759 8,438
-------- -------- --------
Operating income 496 1,128 1,306
Gain on sales of operating investment
properties 19,530 - -
-------- -------- --------
Net income 20,026 1,128 1,306
Distributions to venturers (23,882) (1,861) (2,246)
Venturers' capital, beginning of year 6,213 6,946 7,886
-------- -------- --------
Venturers' capital, end of year $ 2,357 $ 6,213 $ 6,946
======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
COMBINED JOINT VENTURES OF
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
Increase (Decrease) in Cash
(In thousands)
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 20,026 $ 1,128 $ 1,306
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 2,033 2,443 2,423
Amortization of deferred financing costs - 34 34
Gain on sale of operating investment properties (19,530) - -
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses 24 6 90
Accounts receivable - affiliates - 11 6
Accounts receivable from tenants and others 417 (282) (68)
Cash reserve for capital expenditures (338) 378 332
Cash reserve for insurance and taxes 105 4 (64)
Cash reserve for tenant security deposits (3) 35 (10)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (569) 489 (6)
Accounts payable - affiliate - (5) 1
Accrued interest (519) 32 (66)
Accrued real estate taxes (183) 20 (44)
Other liabilities (40) 91 19
Tenant security deposits (186) 2 9
--------- -------- ----------
Total adjustments (18,789) 3,258 2,656
--------- -------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,237 4,386 3,962
--------- -------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net proceeds from sales of operating
investment properties 40,384 - -
Additions to operating investment properties (619) (1,245) (516)
Payment of leasing commissions (84) (155) (55)
--------- -------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities 39,681 (1,400) (571)
--------- -------- ----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to venturers (23,839) (1,878) (2,432)
Payments to venturers for notes payable (399) - (89)
Principal payments on long-term debt (17,429) (727) (675)
--------- -------- ----------
Net cash used in financing activities (41,667) (2,605) (3,196)
--------- -------- ----------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (749) 381 195
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 1,206 825 630
--------- -------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 457 $ 1,206 $ 825
========= ======== ==========
Cash paid during the year for interest $ 2,813 $ 2,671 $ 2,834
========= ======== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes.
<PAGE>
COMBINED JOINT VENTURES OF
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
1. Organization and Nature of Operations
-------------------------------------
The accompanying financial statements of the Combined Joint Ventures of
Paine Webber Income Properties Six Limited Partnership (PWIP6) include the
accounts of PWIP6's three unconsolidated joint venture investees as of September
30, 1999. Gwinnett Mall Corners Associates, a Georgia general partnership, was
organized on August 28, 1985, by PWIP6 and Mall Corners III, Ltd., a Georgia
limited partnership (MC III), to acquire and operate a 304,000 square foot
shopping center located in Gwinnett County, Georgia. Regent's Walk Associates
was organized on April 25, 1985 in accordance with a joint venture agreement
between PWIP6 and Peterson Interests of Kansas, Inc. (PIK). The joint venture
was organized to purchase and operate a 255-unit apartment complex known as
Regent's Walk Apartments in Overland Park, Kansas. The apartment complex was
purchased on May 15, 1985. Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates was organized on July
25, 1985 in accordance with a joint venture agreement between PWIP6 and
Hurstbourne Apartments Company, Ltd. (Limited Partnership). The joint venture
was organized to purchase and operate a 409-unit apartment complex known as
Hurstbourne, Kentucky. During the current fiscal year, on November 16, 1998
Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates sold the Hurstbourne Apartments, and, on
September 30, 1999 Regent's Walk Associates sold the Regent's Walk Apartments.
See Note 3 for a description of these transactions. The financial statements of
the Combined Joint Ventures are presented in combined form due to the nature of
the relationship between the co-venturers and PWIP6, which owns a majority
financial interest but does not have voting control in each joint venture.
2. Use of Estimates and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
---------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared on the
accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles which require management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities as of September 30, 1999 and 1998 and revenues
and expenses for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1999.
Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
Basis of presentation
---------------------
The records of two of the combined joint ventures, Gwinnett Mall Corners
Associates and Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates, are maintained on an income tax
basis of accounting and adjusted to generally accepted accounting principles and
reflect the necessary adjustments, principally to depreciation and amortization.
The records of Regent's Walk Associates are maintained in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Revenue Recognition
-------------------
The Combined Joint Ventures lease space at the operating investment
properties under short-term and long-term operating leases. Rental revenues are
recognized on a straight-line basis as earned pursuant to the terms of the
leases.
Operating investment properties
-------------------------------
The operating investment properties are carried at cost, reduced by
accumulated depreciation, or an amount less than cost if indicators of
impairment are present in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," which was adopted in fiscal 1997. SFAS
No. 121 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in
operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash
flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets'
carrying amount. Management generally assesses indicators of impairment by a
review of independent appraisal reports on each operating investment property.
Such appraisals make use of a combination of certain generally accepted
valuation techniques, including direct capitalization, discounted cash flows and
comparable sales analysis.
Depreciation expense is computed on the straight-line basis over the
estimated useful life of the buildings, equipment and tenant improvements,
generally 5 to 30 years. Payments made to PWIP6 under a master lease agreement
to guarantee a preference return were recorded as reductions of the basis of the
Mall Corners operating investment property. Professional fees, including
acquisition fees paid to a related party (Note 3), and other costs have been
capitalized and are included in the cost of the operating investment properties.
Income tax matters
------------------
The Combined Joint Ventures are not subject to U.S. federal or state
income taxes. The partners report their proportionate share of the joint
venture's taxable income or tax loss in their respective tax returns; therefore,
no provision for income taxes is included in the accompanying financial
statements.
Deferred expenses
-----------------
Lease commissions are being amortized over the shorter of ten years or the
remaining term of the related lease on a straight-line basis. Permanent loan
fees and related debt acquisition costs are being amortized on the effective
interest method over the term of the related mortgage loans. Organization costs
represent legal fees associated with the formation of the joint venture and were
amortized over five years on a straight-line basis.
Cash and cash equivalents
-------------------------
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Combined Joint Ventures consider
all highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days of less to be
cash equivalents.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
-----------------------------------
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and reserved cash
approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturities of these
instruments. It is not practicable for management to estimate the fair value of
the receivable from Mall Corners III or notes payable to venturers without
incurring excessive costs because the obligations were provided in non-arm's
length transactions without regard to fixed maturities, collateral issues or
other traditional conditions and covenants. The fair value of long-term debt is
estimated, where applicable, using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the
current market rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements (see Note 6).
3. Partnership Agreements and Related Party Transactions
-----------------------------------------------------
Gwinnett Mall Corners Associates
--------------------------------
The Mall Corners joint venture agreement provides that PWIP6 will receive
from cash flow, as defined, a annual cumulative preferred return, payable
monthly, of $1,047,000. In the event cash flow, as defined, was insufficient to
pay the PWIP6 preference return described above through November 1, 1990, MC III
was required to fund the joint venture a monthly amount equal to the difference
between $68,000 (the guaranteed preferred return) and cash flow, as defined.
PWIP6 and MC III were in disagreement as to the amount of deficiencies to be
funded by MC III through September 30, 1989. During 1990, the partners reached
an agreement as to the cumulative deficiencies to be funded by MC III. This
agreement resulted in a decrease to the receivable from MC III and a decrease in
MC III's capital of $245,000. The joint venture made distributions to PWIP6 of
$1,047,000 in fiscal 1999. Cumulative preferred distributions in arrears at
September 30, 1999 amounted to approximately $2,117,000 including minimum
guaranteed distributions in arrears of $427,000. The minimum guaranteed
distributions are accrued in the accompanying financial statements. However, the
remainder of the cumulative preferred distributions are payable only from future
cash flow or sale or refinancing proceeds. Accordingly, such amounts are not
accrued in the accompanying financial statements.
The receivable from MC III totaled $665,000 at September 30, 1999 and
1998. The receivable is guaranteed by the partners of MC III, however, the
venture is subject to credit loss to the extent the guarantors are unable to
fulfill their obligation. The venture does not anticipate nonperformance by MC
III due to their interest in the venture and the underlying value of the
venture's assets.
MC III is entitled to receive quarterly non-cumulative, subordinated
returns of $38,000 each quarterly period, subject to available cash flow. Due to
insufficient cash flow, MC III received no distributions for any of the three
years in the period ended September 30, 1999. Any remaining cash flow, as
defined, after payment of MC III's preferred return, is to be distributed to the
Initial Property Manager (an affiliate of MC III) in an amount equal to the then
unpaid subordinated management fees from prior fiscal years, then next to pay
accrued interest on any loans made by PWIP6 and MC III to the joint venture. The
next $500,000, if any, is to be distributed 80% to PWIP6 and 20% to MC III, the
second $500,000, if any, is to be distributed 70% to PWIP6 and 30% to MC III and
the remaining balance, if any, is to be distributed 60% to PWIP6 and 40% to MC
III.
Taxable income or tax loss is allocated to PWIP6 and MC III based on the
proportionate percentage of net cash flow distributed; if no net cash flow has
been distributed, 100% to PWIP6. Allocations of the joint venture's operations
between PWIP6 and MC III for financial reporting purposes have been made in
conformity with the allocations of taxable income or tax loss.
If additional cash is required for any reason in connection with
operations of the joint venture, it is to be provided 70% by PWIP6 and 30% by MC
III in the form of operating loans. The rate of interest shall equal the lesser
of the rate announced by the First National Bank of Boston as its prime rate or
the maximum rate of interest permitted by applicable law. In the event a partner
shall default in its obligation to make an operating loan, the other partner may
make all or part of the loan required to be made by the defaulting partner
(default loan). Each default loan shall provide for the accrual of interest at
the rate equal to the lesser of twice the operating loan rate or the maximum
rate of interest permitted by applicable law. PWIP6 made a temporary advance of
$200,000 to the venture during fiscal 1995 to fund a good faith deposit required
in connection with the refinancing transaction described in Note 6. Such funds
were returned to PWIP6 in fiscal 1996 subsequent to the closing of the
refinancing transaction. There were no operating/default loans outstanding as of
the end of fiscal 1999 or 1998. Operating/default loans of $89,000 were required
in fiscal years prior to 1991 (see Note 5). These loans were repaid during
fiscal 1997. Total interest incurred and expensed for these loans amounted to
$1,000 in fiscal year 1997.
Distribution of sale and/or refinancing proceeds are to be as follows,
after making a provision for liabilities and obligations and to the extent not
previously returned to each partner: (1) payment of accrued interest and
operating notes payable to partners (2) to PWIP6, the aggregate amount of the
PWIP6 Preference Return that shall not have been distributed, (3) to PWIP6, an
amount equal to PWIP6's gross investment, (4) the next $2,000,000 to MC III, (5)
to the Initial Property Manager, as defined below, for any unpaid subordinated
management fees that shall have accrued, (6) the next $4,000,000 allocated to
PWIP6 and MC III in the proportions 80% and 20%, respectively, (7) the next
$3,000,000 allocated to PWIP6 and MC III in the proportions of 70% and 30%,
respectively, and (8) any remaining balance shall be allocated to PWIP6 and MC
III 70% and 30%, respectively, until PWIP6 receives an amount equal to all net
losses allocated to PWIP6 for the years through calendar 1989 in which the
maximum Federal income tax rate for individuals was less than 50% times a
percentage equal to 50% minus the weighted average maximum federal income tax
rate for individuals in effect during such years plus a simple rate of return
added to each year's amount equal to 8% per annum. Thereafter, any remaining
balance shall be distributed to PWIP6 and MC III in the ratios of 60% and 40%,
respectively.
The joint venture has entered into a property management contract with a
former affiliate of MC III (the Initial Property Manager), cancellable at
PWIP6's option upon the occurrence of certain events. The management fee is
equal to 3% of gross rents, as defined, of which 1.5% was subordinated to the
receipt by PWIP6 of its guaranteed preferred return through November 1990.
Management fees incurred in 1999, 1998 and 1997 were $108,000, $97,000 and
$103,000, respectively. The property manager provided maintenance and leasing
services to the joint venture totalling $82,000, $171,000 and $85,000 in 1999,
1998 and 1997, respectively.
PaineWebber Properties Incorporated, the adviser to PWIP6 and an affiliate
of Paine Webber Incorporated, received an acquisition fee of $579,000 in
connection with PWIP6's original investment in the joint venture and the
acquisition of the property.
Included in buildings and deferred expenses are $1,047,000 and $115,000,
respectively of costs paid to the Initial Property Manager prior to the
formation of the joint venture. These costs have been recorded as part of the
basis of the assets contributed to the joint venture by MC III as its capital
contribution. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, MC III was required to
fund initial tenant improvements and lease commissions through capital
contributions.
Regent's Walk Associates
------------------------
On September 30, 1999, Regent's Walk Associates sold its operating
investment property, the Regent's Walk Apartments, to an affiliate of its
unaffiliated joint venture partner for $17.75 million. The sale generated net
proceeds to PWIP6 of approximately $8,068,000, after the assumption of the
outstanding first mortgage loan of approximately $8,624,000, accrued interest of
approximately $51,000, closing proration adjustments of approximately $189,000,
and a payment of approximately $818,000 to PWIP6's non-affiliated co-venture
partner for its share of the net proceeds in accordance with the terms of the
joint venture agreement. In addition, as a result of the Regent's Walk sale,
PWIP6 received $117,000 which had been held in escrow at the property plus
$257,000 as a result of operations of the property through the date of sale.
PWIP6 had entered into negotiations with its Regent's Walk Apartments co-venture
partner for a sale of the property during the third quarter of fiscal 1999. On
May 19, 1999, PWIP6 negotiated a purchase and sale agreement with an affiliate
of the co-venturer to sell the property for what PWIP6 believed was a very
favorable price of $17,750,000. The prospective buyer subsequently made
non-refundable deposits totalling $1,250,000. The only contingency was for
approval by the lender for an assumption of the first mortgage loan as part of
the sale transaction. The joint venture subsequently received this approval and
the sale closed on September 30, 1999. The sale of the Regent's Walk Apartments
resulted in a gain of $8,268,000 for financial reporting purposes in fiscal
1999.
The Regent's Walk joint venture agreement provided that PWIP6 would
receive from cash flow a cumulative preferred return, payable quarterly, of
$164,000. Commencing June 1, 1988, after PWIP6 had received its cumulative
preferred return, PIK was entitled to a preference return of $7,000 for each
fiscal quarter which was cumulative only for amounts due in any one fiscal year.
Any remaining cash flow was to be used to pay interest on any notes from the
venturers and then was to be distributed to the partners, with PWIP6 receiving
90% of the first $200,000, 80% of the next $200,000 and 70% of any remainder.
Income or loss was to be allocated to the partners based on their
proportionate share of cash distributions.
Under the terms of the venture agreement, PIK was required to make loans
to the joint venture up to a total of $250,000 for additional cash needed by the
joint venture for any reason including payment of the PWIP6 preference return,
prior to June 1, 1992. After the joint venture had borrowed $250,000 from PIK,
if the joint venture required additional funds for purposes other than
distributions, then it was to be provided 90% by PWIP6 and 10% by PIK (see Note
5).
Distribution of sale and/or refinancing proceeds were to be distributed as
follows, after making a provision for liabilities and obligations: (1) repayment
to PIK of up to $250,000 of operating loans plus accrued interest thereon, (2)
payment of accrued interest and repayment of principal of operating notes
(pro-rata), (3) payment to PWIP6 of any preferred return arrearage, (4) to
PWIP6, an amount equal to PWIP6's gross investment plus $560,000, (5) to PIK,
the amount of $500,000, (6) to payment of a brokers fee to the partners if a
sale is made to a third party, (7) to the payment of up to $100,000 of
subordinated management fees, (8) the next $8,000,000 to PWIP6 and PIK in the
proportions of 90% and 10%, respectively, (9) the next $4,000,000 to PWIP6 and
PIK in the proportions of 80% and 20%, respectively, and (10) any remaining
balance 70% to PWIP6 and 30% to PIK.
The joint venture entered into a property management contract with an
affiliate ("property manager") of PIK. The management fee was 4% of gross rents,
as defined until June 1, 1990 when the fee increased to 5% of gross rents.
Subsequent to June 1, 1988, that portion of the fees representing 1% of gross
rents was to be payable only to the extent of cash flow remaining after PWIP6
has received its preferred return. Any payments not made pursuant to the above
were payable only out of sale or refinancing proceeds as specified in the
agreement. As of September 30, 1998, deferred management fees exceeded the
$100,000 limitation referred to above. As of October 1, 1997, the management fee
was reduced to 2.5%, all of which was payable as earned.
At September 30, 1998, $5,000 was due to the property manager for
management fees. For the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 property
management fees totalled $64,000, $63,000 and $102,000, respectively. During
1999, 1998 and 1997, management fees of $25,000, $25,000 and $25,000,
respectively, were subordinated as described above.
PaineWebber Properties Incorporated, the advisor to PWIP6 and an affiliate
of PaineWebber Incorporated, was paid an acquisition fee of $390,000 in
connection with PWIP6's investment in the joint venture.
Kentucky - Hurstbourne Associates
---------------------------------
On November 16, 1998, Kentucky-Hurstbourne Associates sold its operating
investment property, the Hurstbourne Apartments, to an unrelated party for $22.9
million. The sale generated net proceeds of approximately $12,941,000 to PWIP 6
after the repayment of the outstanding first mortgage loan of approximately
$8,124,000, accrued interest of approximately $30,000, a prepayment penalty of
$187,000, closing proration adjustments of approximately $380,000, closing costs
of approximately $266,000 and a payment of approximately $972,000 to PWIP6's
co-venture partner for its share of the net proceeds in accordance with the
terms of the joint venture agreement. PWIP 6 and its co-venture partner had been
exploring potential opportunities to market the Hurstbourne Apartments for sale
during calendar year 1998. During the second quarter of fiscal 1998, PWIP6 and
its co-venture partner held discussions concerning potential marketing
strategies. During the third quarter of fiscal 1998, PWIP6 and its co-venture
partner solicited marketing proposals from several real estate brokerage firms.
After reviewing their respective proposals and conducting interviews, PWIP6 and
its co-venture partner selected a national brokerage firm that has experience
selling apartment properties in the Louisville area to market the property for
sale. Sales materials were finalized by late May 1998, and an extensive
marketing campaign began in early June 1998. A purchase and sale agreement with
the prospective buyer was signed on October 2, 1998, and the transaction closed
on November 16, 1998, as described above. The sale of the Hurstbourne property
resulted in a gain of $11,262,000 for financial reporting purposes in fiscal
1999.
The taxable income or tax losses of the joint venture was to be allocated
to PWIP6 and the Limited Partnership in proportion to the distribution of net
cash flow, provided that the Limited Partnership was not to be allocated less
than ten percent of the taxable net income or tax losses, and the Limited
Partnership was not to be allocated net profits in excess of net cash flow
distributed to it during the fiscal year.
Any proceeds arising from a refinancing, sale, exchange or other
disposition of property were to be distributed first to the payment of unpaid
principal and accrued interest on any outstanding notes. Any remaining proceeds
were to be distributed in the following order: repayment of unpaid principal and
accrued interest on all outstanding operating notes to PWIP6 and the Limited
Partnership; the amount of any undistributed preference payments to PWIP6 for
the period through July 31, 1989 ($1,354,000); $10,056,000 to PWIP6; $684,000 to
the Limited Partnership; the amount of any unpaid subordinated management fees
to the property manager ($118,000); $9,000,000 distributed 90% to PWIP6 and 10%
to the Limited Partnership; $4,500,000 distributed 80% to PWIP6 and 20% to the
Limited Partnership; with any remaining balance distributed 70% to PWIP6 and 30%
to the Limited Partnership.
The venture had a property management contract with an affiliate (property
manager) of the Limited Partnership until April 1, 1997. The management fee to
the related property manager was 5% of gross rents. Through July 30, 1988, 40%
of the manager's fee was subordinated to receipt by PWIP6 and the Limited
Partnership of their preference returns. At September 30, 1998, cumulative
subordinated management fees payable to the related property manager were
approximately $118,000. Under terms of the venture agreement and as stated in
Note 3, unpaid subordinated management fees were only to be paid upon
refinancing, sale, exchange or other disposition of the property. For the year
ended September 30, 1997 property management fees paid to the related property
manager totalled $74,000.
PaineWebber Properties Incorporated, the advisor to PWIP6 and an affiliate
of PaineWebber Incorporated, was paid an acquisition fee of $500,000 in fiscal
1985 in connection with PWIP6's investment in the joint venture.
4. Leasing Activities
------------------
The Gwinnett Mall Corners joint venture derives its income from
noncancellable operating leases which expire on various dates through the year
2010. The operating property was approximately 73% leased as of September 30,
1999. The approximate future minimum lease payments to be received under
noncancellable operating leases in effect as of September 30, 1999 are as
follows (in thousands):
Year ending September 30:
------------------------
2000 $ 3,014
2001 2,898
2002 2,648
2003 2,277
2004 1,946
Thereafter 2,567
-------
$15,350
=======
Three of the venture's tenants individually comprise more than 10% of the
venture's fiscal 1999 base rental income. These tenants operate in the clothing
retailing, household retailing and the furniture retailing industries. The same
three tenants individually comprise more than 10% of the venture's total future
minimum rents. Their industry and future minimum rents are as follows (in
thousands):
Clothing retailer $1,571
Household retailer $3,227
Furniture retailer $1,900
5. Notes Payable to Venturers
--------------------------
Regarding Regent's Walk Associates, during the years ended September 30,
1988 and 1987, PIK loaned the venture $25,000 and $225,000, respectively, under
the terms of the venture agreement. Also, during those same years, the venture
partners advanced $100,000 and $49,000, respectively, for additional renovation
costs with PWIP6 providing 90% and PIK providing 10%.
Notes payable to venturers generally bear interest at the rate of prime
plus 1% (9.50% at September 30, 1998). Interest incurred and expensed on notes
payable to venturers for the years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997
totalled $38,000 in each year.
6. Long-term Debt
---------------
Long-term debt consists of the following amounts (in thousands):
1999 1998
---- ----
Gwinnett Mall Corners Associates'
nonrecourse mortgage note secured
by a Deed to Secure Debt and
Security Agreement on the joint
venture's property. The note has a
term of 10 years, bears interest at
a rate of 7.4% per annum and
requires monthly principal and
interest payments based on a 20
year amortization schedule. The
loan matures on December 1, 2005.
The fair value of this note payable
approximated its carrying value as
of September 30, 1999 and 1998. $18,151 $18,705
Kentucky - Hurstbourne Associates'
nonrecourse promissory note secured
by the venture's operating
property; bore interest at 12.625%
through September 30, 1992. In
1992, the Partnership exercised an
option to extend the maturity date
of the loan to September 30, 1999
with a 7.695% interest rate.
Principal and interest payments of
$62 are due monthly, with a balloon
payment of $8,022 due at maturity.
The fair value of this note payable
approximated its carrying value as
of September 30, 1998. - 8,144
Regent's Walk Associates'
nonrecourse first mortgage note
secured by the venture's operating
investment property. The first
mortgage loan bears interest at an
annual rate of 7.32% and requires
principal and interest payments of
$62 on a monthly basis through
maturity on October 1, 2000, at
which time a balloon payment of
$8,500 will be due. The fair value
of this note payable approximated
its carrying value as of September
30, 1998. - 8,731
------- -------
18,151 35,580
Less current portion (597) (8,805)
------- -------
$17,554 $26,775
======= =======
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt for the next five fiscal years and
thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
2000 $ 597
2001 642
2002 691
2003 744
2004 801
Thereafter 14,676
-------
$18,151
=======
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
COMBINED JOINT VENTURES
PAINE WEBBER INCOME PROPERTIES SIX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SCHEDULE OF REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
September 30, 1999
(In thousands)
<CAPTION>
Initial Cost to Gross Amount at Which Carried at Life on Which
Partnership Costs Close of period Depreciation
Buildings Capitalized Buildings, in Latest
Improvements (Removed) Improvements Income
& Personal Subsequent to & Personal Accumulated Date of Date Statement
Description Encumbrances Land Property Acquisition Land Property Total Depreciation Construction Acquired is Computed
- ----------- ------------ ---- -------- ----------- ---- -------- ----- ------------ ------------ -------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Shopping
Center -
Gwinnett
County, GA $18,151 $ 7,039 $21,509 $2,626 $7,039 $24,344 $31,383 $12,023 1985 8/28/85 5 to 30 Yrs.
Notes
(A) The aggregate cost of real estate owned at September 30, 1999 for Federal income tax purposes is approximately $23,460.
(B) See Note 5 of Notes to Combined Financial Statements for a description of the long-term mortgage debt encumbering the
operating investment properties.
(C) Reconciliation of real estate owned:
1999 1998 1997
---- ---- ----
Balance at beginning of year $66,901 $65,656 $65,140
Additions and improvements 619 1,245 516
Disposals (36,137) - -
------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year $31,383 $66,901 $65,656
======= ======= =======
(D) Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation:
Balance at beginning of year $25,487 $23,297 $21,119
Depreciation expense 1,703 2,190 2,178
Disposals (15,167) - -
-------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year $12,023 $25,487 $23,297
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-END> Sep-30-1999
<CASH> 12,665
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 879
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 13,544
<PP&E> 0
<DEPRECIATION> 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 13,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 34
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 12,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 13,544
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 19,437
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 447
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 18,990
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 18,990
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 18,990
<EPS-BASIC> 313.18
<EPS-DILUTED> 313.18
</TABLE>
