MEDICAL IMAGING CENTERS OF AMERICA INC
DFAN14A, 1996-02-09
SPECIALTY OUTPATIENT FACILITIES, NEC
Previous: MEDICAL IMAGING CENTERS OF AMERICA INC, DFAN14A, 1996-02-09
Next: AARP GROWTH TRUST, 497, 1996-02-09



                                  SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (Rule 14a-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                    Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Filed by the registrant / /

Filed by a party other than the registrant /X/

Check the appropriate box:

       / /      Preliminary proxy statement
       / /      Definitive proxy statement
       /X/      Definitive additional materials
       / /      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14(a)-12


                    MEDICAL IMAGING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  (Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


                            STEEL PARTNERS COMMITTEE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   (Name of Person(s) filing Proxy Statement)


         Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):

        / /      $125 per Exchange  Act Rule  0-11(c)(1)(ii),  14a-6(i)(1),  or
                 14a-6(j)(2).

        /X/      $500 per each party to the  controversy  pursuant  to Exchange
                 Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).

        / /      Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
                 and 0-11.

        (1)      Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


        (2)      Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


        (3)      Per  unit  price  or  other  underlying  value  of  transaction
                 computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11: (1)


- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


        (4)      Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- --------
(1)  Set   forth  the   amount   on  which  the   filing   fee  is   calculated
and  state  how  it was determined.
<PAGE>

        /X/      Check  box if any  part of the fee is  offset  as  provided  by
Exchange Act Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting
fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

         (1)      Amount previously paid:


         $500
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (2)      Form, schedule or registration statement no.:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (3)      Filing party:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (4)      Date filed:



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       -2-

<PAGE>
                          THE STEEL PARTNERS COMMITTEE
                              750 Lexington Avenue
                               New York, NY 10022



                                                                February 7, 1996


                       ROBERT MUEHLBERG AND HIS BOARD OWN
                       ONLY 3,000 MEDICAL IMAGING SHARES.

                    WHAT KIND OF CONFIDENCE DOES THIS SHOW IN
                 THEIR ABILITY TO MANAGE AND GROW YOUR COMPANY?


DEAR FELLOW MEDICAL IMAGING SHAREHOLDER:

         For more than four years,  Medical  Imaging's prior  management,  which
included Robert Muehlberg,  led the Company through a seemingly  unending record
of losses,  wiping out over $50,000,000 of shareholder's  equity. The result was
that medical Imaging shares were trading at  approximately  $0.70 per share when
Steel Partners first began to buy its shares in January 1995.*

         Your vote can truly  change  things.  Join with us to elect a new Board
which owns almost 20% of the  outstanding  stock.  Our interests are the same as
yours - - to realize  maximum  value for our  investment  in  Medical  Imaging's
shares.

         Don't let  Muehlberg  and his Board  succeed in their  attempt to claim
credit for Medical  Imaging's 1995 stock price  increase.  In our view,  this is
quite  amusing.  Ask yourself  where Medical  Imaging's  share price would be if
Steel  Partners had not  purchased  more than 527,000  shares since January last
year?

         Please mark, sign, date and return the enclosed BLUE proxy card today.

                OUR CASE AGAINST THE CURRENT BOARD AND MANAGEMENT

          o    From 1991 to the end of 1994, the Company  accumulated  losses in
               excess of $60 million  under the former  President  and CEO. Even
               though  he was  eventually  replaced  at a  substantial  cost  to
               shareholders,  his successor was the  Company's  Chief  Operating
               Officer and ten-year employee, Robert Muehlberg.

          o    While your stock suffered,  Muehlberg and Denise Sunseri, another
               inside  director,   received  bonuses  in  both  1994  and  1993.
               Remember-- in 1993 medical  Imaging lost $30 million  dollars and
               stockholder's equity was almost wiped out.

          o    One other  director,  Keith Burnett,  is a principal in a private
               company which was paid more than  $1,200,000,  in 1995, for their
               interest in four radiology centers owned by your Company.

- --------
*    Not    giving    effect    to    the    1    for    5    reverse    stock
split    which     occurred    in October 1995.


<PAGE>

          o    Burnett and another  director,  Robert  Ricci,  have been granted
               warrants to purchase 69,000 shares,  some with exercise prices as
               low as $4.05 per share. In addition, each man is paid significant
               fees for attending Board meetings.

          o    The Board recently  amended their  co-directors,  Muehlberg's and
               Sunseri's employment  agreements to add substantial new severance
               payments  if the  shareholders  vote the  existing  Board  out of
               office.

          o    Management  and the Board has estimated  that it will spend up to
               $500,000 of  shareholder  funds to fight our proxy  challenge  --
               mostly for attorney and  investment  banker fees.  This is just a
               desperate attempt to save their lucrative jobs, cozy positions as
               directors and potential sweetheart deals.

          o    You  should  ask  yourself  why one  outside  director,  E. Keene
               Wolcott, resigned from the Board in protest just last month.

         Remember  not one of the  current  directors  has any  experience  as a
director of another public  company.  Unfortunately,  the directors take care of
themselves, but what about the shareholders?

         Why didn't any current director purchase even a single share of Medical
Imaging  stock in all of 1995?  Do they really  believe in the future of Medical
Imaging?

         Vote  AGAINST the  current  Board whose  entire  investment  in Medical
Imaging is only 3,000 shares. Vote your BLUE proxy today.


                      WHO IS THE STEEL PARTNERS COMMITTEE?

         Steel  Partners is an  investment  firm with a philosophy of purchasing
substantial  stakes in  companies  that we  believe  are poorly  managed  and/or
severely  undervalued by the market.  We attempt to work with the existing Board
and management or bring in new management to improve value for all shareholders.

         Throughout  our  history,  we have never  solicited,  nor would we ever
accept, any proposal not available to all shareholders.  Moreover, we have never
accepted and will never accept greenmail.

         The  Committee's  slate  has  substantial   experience  in  healthcare,
finance, banking,  operations,  and manufacturing and service business areas. We
have  a  fine  record  of  success  and  achievement  in  implementing  business
strategies designed to maximize shareholder value.

         But don't just take our word for it.  Consider the tangible  results in
increased  share value our effort and commitment  have brought to companies such
as Alpha Technologies and Gateway Industries.

          o    Alpha Technologies Group, Inc. -- formerly Synercom Technology --
               was a  money-losing  software  company  with a $1.50  stock price
               before we were involved.  Following our purchase in 1992 and 1993
               of 13% of the  Company,  we were  offered  three of the six Board
               seats.

          o    Since that time,  Alpha  Technologies has been transformed into a
               growing, profitable electronic components manufacturer. The stock
               is currently trading at about $7.56 -- a gain of over 400%.

          o    Steel Partners  purchased Gateway Industries Inc. common stock in
               early 1994 after it had been losing  money and had agreed to sell
               off

                                       -2-

<PAGE>

               its last  significant  businesses.  Having  joined  the  Board we
               worked to develop a plan to redeploy the  proceeds  from the sale
               of its businesses to enhance shareholder value.

          o    In November  1995,  we announced  the purchase of Marsel Mirror &
               Glass  Products  Inc.  Today Steel  Partners  owns 32% of Gateway
               whose stock price has increased  from a 12 month low of $3.375 to
               its current price of $8.00.

         Of course,  we can't  guarantee  similar  results for  shareholders  of
Medical  Imaging,  but our 20% stake  means  that we,  like you,  have a sizable
investment to protect.  We can guarantee that we will take all appropriate steps
to maximize the value of our mutual investment in the Company for the benefit of
all shareholders.

         If  elected,  the  Committee's  nominees  intend to explore a number of
alternatives to enhance  stockholder  value. These include  acquisitions,  stock
repurchase  programs,  refinancing  existing  debt and the possible  sale of the
Company.

                        VOTE YOUR BLUE PROXY CARD TODAY!

         Vote for directors with a meaningful  stake in the Company they govern.
Vote for  directors  who share  your  interest  in seeing  the value of  Medical
Imaging shares grow. Please mark, sign, date and mail the Committee's BLUE proxy
card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope provided. Please vote TODAY!

         If you have questions or comments,  please call the Committee  directly
at (212)  446-5217 or call  MacKenzie  Partners,  Inc.,  which is assisting  the
Committee with this transaction, toll-free at (800) 322-2885.

         We would be pleased to discuss our slate and plans for the Company with
you or to instruct you on how to make sure your shares are voted.  We appreciate
your consideration of our slate and plans for Medical Imaging.

                                   On Behalf of the Steel Partners Committee

                                   Sincerely,



                                    WARREN LICHTENSTEIN

                                       -3-

<PAGE>
                                    BULLETIN

         You should be aware  that on the day prior to the  record  date for the
Company's  upcoming Special  Meeting,  the Board and management cut a sweetheart
deal with one of the Company's largest creditors.

         In  simultaneous  transactions,  this  creditor  exercised  warrants to
purchase 160,000 shares at $5.70 per share,  received  warrants form the Company
to purchase an  additional  60,000 more shares at $8.50,  and also received from
the Company an early repayment of certain of Medical Imaging's debt.

         Since this  creditor  has  effectively  agreed to support  management's
slate of nominees at the Special Meeting,  ask yourself whether this deal was in
YOUR best  interests or in the best  interests of Muehlberg  and his Board?  Ask
yourself  whether the recent  amendment to Muehlberg's  and Sunseri's  severance
agreements was in your best interests or their's.


                  If you have questions or need assistance in voting your shares
please contact:



                            MACKENZIE PARTNERS, INC.
                                156 Fifth Avenue,
                            New York, New York 10010
                          (212) 929-5500 (call collect)
                                       or
                          Call Toll-Free (800) 322-2885

                                       -4-



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission