MEDICAL IMAGING CENTERS OF AMERICA INC
DFAN14A, 1996-01-25
SPECIALTY OUTPATIENT FACILITIES, NEC
Previous: HANCOCK JOHN PROPERTIES LTD PARTNERSHIP, 8-K, 1996-01-25
Next: MEDICAL IMAGING CENTERS OF AMERICA INC, 8-K, 1996-01-25



                                  SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (RULE 14A-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                    PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Filed by the registrant / /

Filed by a party other than the registrant /X/

Check the appropriate box:

          / /   Preliminary proxy statement
         / /    Definitive proxy statement
        /X/     Definitive additional materials
       / /      Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14(a)-12


                    MEDICAL IMAGING CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  (Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

                            STEEL PARTNERS COMMITTEE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   (Name of Person(s) filing Proxy Statement)


         Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):

         / /       $125 per Exchange Act Rule  0-11(c)(1)(ii),  14a-6(i)(1),  or
                   14a-6(j)(2).

        /X/        $500 per each party to the  controversy  pursuant to Exchange
                   Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).

       / /         Fee   computed  on  table  below  per   Exchange   Act  Rules
                   14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

         (1)       Title  of each  class  of  securities  to  which  transaction
                   applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         (2)       Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         (3)       Per  unit  price  or other  underlying  value of  transaction
                   computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:1

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         (4)       Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ----------
        1Set forth the  amount on which the filing fee is  calculated
and state how it was determined.

<PAGE>

       /X/    Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting  fee was
paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

         (1)      Amount previously paid:

         $500
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         (2)      Form, schedule or registration statement no.:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         (3)      Filing party:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         (4)      Date filed:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                       -2-

<PAGE>

                          THE STEEL PARTNERS COMMITTEE
                              750 Lexington Avenue
                               New York, NY 10022


                                                          January 23, 1996


Dear Fellow Medical Imaging Shareholder:

         We are writing to you as Medical Imaging  Centers of America's  largest
shareholder. We own ALMOST 20% (487,374 SHARES) of the Company, compared to LESS
THAN 1% (2,654 SHARES) owned by the entire Board.

         Our Committee has called a special meeting of shareholders for February
26, 1996 to address key issues regarding shareholder democracy:

         o    Who do you want to be in charge of the Company, its assets and its
              future?

         o    Who should  determine  the share  ownership  of the Company -- the
              Board with its poison pill, or the true owners of the Company, its
              shareholders?

         The current  Board claims to have your  interests in mind and wants you
to believe  that Steel  Partners  does not. A look at the past six years - - and
the most recent six weeks -  demonstrates  that Medical  Imaging's  shareholders
need to remove the present Board and replace them with the Committee's nominees.
SIGN,  DATE AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD TODAY.  DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE
COMPANY'S DISTORTIONS! LOOK AT THE FACTS - - AND ONLY THE FACTS.

                     THE BOARD'S TRACK RECORD IS DISASTROUS

         o    A What has been the Board's track  record?  Based on the Company's
              public  filings with the SEC, the sum of $100,  if invested in the
              Company's  common shares in 1989, would have been worth $6 at year
              end 1994. SHAREHOLDERS HAVE SUFFERED ENOUGH!

         o    Why has  Medical  Imaging's  share price  improved  in 1995?  What
              changed?  Starting in January 1995, Steel Partners  actively began
              to purchase shares.  Steel continued to purchase shares throughout
              1995  at  increasing  prices,  and  now  owns  almost  20%  of the
              Company's shares. Steel

<PAGE>

              Partners believes its purchasing  activity is the principal reason
              for the price increase in 1995. STEEL PARTNERS'  COMMITMENT TO THE
              COMPANY HAS INCREASED THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

                THE BOARD'S PROGRAM IS CONTRARY TO YOUR INTERESTS

         The Board's  program  includes  more than poor share  performance.  The
Board has shown that it will go to any length to protect  their jobs -- spending
your money if needed -- and even using a "poison pill" to prevent  shareholders,
like Steel Partners, from buying stock. What are the facts?

         o    The current Board has refused to redeem the "poison pill" that was
              adopted without shareholder approval.

         o    E. Keene Wolcott,  a director since 1991,  resigned on January 11,
              1996 in protest over the current Board's self-interested  conduct.
              Mr.  Wolcott's  letter to the Board says it best:  "ANTI-TAKE-OVER
              STRATEGIES  (POISON  PILLS) ARE CONTRARY TO DEMOCRATIC  CAPITALISM
              AND ARE NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE STOCKHOLDERS."

         o    Steel Partners agrees. You should, too! VOTE OUT THE "POISON PILL"
              DIRECTORS!

         o    The current Board has responded to Steel  Partners  lawful request
              for a meeting of  shareholders  with  costly  litigation  and high
              priced "consultants".  In just a short time, the Company has spent
              $200,000  to  "fight"  Steel   Partners'   simple   proposal  that
              shareholders  vote now on the Company's  future -- AND THE CURRENT
              BOARD HAS ANNOUNCED THAT IT MAY SPEND AN ADDITIONAL  $300,000,  OR
              MORE.

         o    Did the Board  fight  this hard from 1989 to 1994 to  reverse  the
              downward  slide in the price of your shares?  If management  owned
              more than 2,654  shares,  would  management  spend  their money to
              interfere  with corporate  democracy?  We don't think so. VOTE OUT
              THE "SPEND OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY" DIRECTORS!

         o    The Board has approved  "golden  parachutes" and salary  increases
              for  the   officer/directors  and  options  and  warrants  to  all
              directors. VOTE OUT BOB MUEHLBERG AND HIS DIRECTORS!

               DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE BOARD'S SMOKESCREEN TACTICS

         o    The current  Board claims to have faith in its  business  plan for
              the Company  and asks for our  support.  But if the current  Board
              believed in its own program, then why

                                       -2-

<PAGE>

              haven't they purchased a single share in over two years? The Board
              has  demonstrated  its lack of  confidence  in their own  business
              strategy. DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE BOARD'S PROMISE TO DO BETTER!

         o    The Board claims that Steel Partners should accept its proposal to
              restrict its  representation to two seats on a seven-person  board
              -- even though 100% of the Board is now  controlled  by  directors
              who own less than 1% of the  Company's  shares.  The real issue is
              who do you want as steward for the  Company and its assets?  DON'T
              BE FOOLED BY THE BOARD'S PHONY MATHEMATICS.

         o    The Board  claims  that Steel  Partners  will act  contrary to the
              interests of other  shareholders.  Who do you think is more likely
              to protect YOUR  interests in the ----  Company,  Steel  Partners,
              whose  investment in the Company is valued at  approximately  $4.3
              million,  or the  current  Board  which owns 2,654  shares?  STEEL
              PARTNERS'  INTERESTS ARE THE SAME AS YOURS - - TO SEE THE PRICE OF
              MEDICAL IMAGING SHARES INCREASE.

         o    The Board claims that Steel Partners has accepted greenmail in the
              past. This is a lie. STEEL PARTNERS HAS NEVER RECEIVED A GREENMAIL
              PAYMENT, OR ANY SIMILAR PREFERENTIAL PAYMENT.

         o    Steel  Partners  has  neither  requested  and would not accept any
              greenmail payment from the Company. DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE CURRENT
              BOARD'S SMOKESCREEN CHARGES.

                      VOTE FOR THE STEEL PARTNERS' NOMINEES

              AS DESCRIBED IN THE ENCLOSED PROXY STATEMENT, STEEL PARTNERS HAS A
HISTORY OF MAXIMIZING  THE VALUE FOR ALL  SHAREHOLDERS  IN COMPANIES IN WHICH IT
HAS  INVESTED.   The  Committee  is  committed  to  providing   Medical  Imaging
shareholders  with a chance to  determine  if the current  Board of Directors or
Steel  Partners'  nominees  should have an opportunity  to maximize  shareholder
value.  We invite you to read our  enclosed  proxy  statement  carefully,  which
contains  further  details  about  the  reasons  for  our  solicitation  and the
backgrounds of our nominees.

                         VOTE YOUR BLUE PROXY CARD TODAY

              Please mark,  sign, date and mail the Committee's  BLUE proxy card
in the enclosed postage-paid envelope provided.

              If you have  questions  or  comments,  please  call the  Committee
directly at (212) 446-5217 or call MacKenzie Partners,  Inc., which is assisting
the Committee with this  transaction,  toll-free at (800) 322-2885.  We would be
pleased to discuss our

                                       -3-

<PAGE>


slate and plans for the Company  with you or to instruct you on how to make sure
your shares are voted.

              We  appreciate  your  consideration  of our  slate  and  plans for
Medical Imaging.

                                  On behalf of the Steel Partners Committee,

                                  Sincerely,

                                  /S/ WARREN LICHTENSTEIN
                                  -----------------------
                                      Warren Lichtenstein


                                       -4-




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission