NPC INTERNATIONAL INC
8-K, 1995-12-04
EATING PLACES
Previous: FEDERATED EQUITY FUNDS, 497, 1995-12-04
Next: ALLIANCE COUNTERPOINT FUND, 497, 1995-12-04




              SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                    Washington, DC 20549


                           FORM 8-K

                        CURRENT REPORT


            Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934

              Date of Report:  December 4, 1995


                    NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
    (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                            Kansas
                   (State of incorporation)

        0-13007                           48-0817298
      (Commission                        (IRS Employer
      File Number)                       Identification No.)

720 W. 20th Street, Pittsburg, Kansas        66762
(Address of principal executive office)      (Zip Code)


        Registrant`s telephone number:  (316-231-3390)



Item 5.     Other events

       On  December 1, 1995, NPC International, Inc. announced that it  was
served  on November 28, 1995, with a second action which was filed  in  the
District  Court  of Crawford County, Kansas by Harbor Finance  Partners,  a
Colorado   partnership,  against  NPC  International,  Inc.,  and   certain
directors  of the Company.  The suit seeks class action status,  injunctive
relief,  unspecified monetary damages and attorney fees  arising  from  the
proposal  of  Mr.  Bicknell,  Chairman of the  Board  and  Chief  Executive
Officer, James K. Schwartz, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Troy
D.   Cook,  Vice  President  Finance  and  Chief  Financial  Officer   (the
``Management  Group``) to purchase the publicly held common  stock  of  the
Company  for $9.00 per share.  On November 15, 1995, the Company  announced
the  filing of a lawsuit in the District Court of Wyandotte County,  Kansas
which  makes similar allegations and seeks comparable relief.  The  Company
believes  that  both of these lawsuits are without merit  and  will  defend
against them vigorously.

      NPC  has  delegated the authority to review and evaluate the proposed
transaction with the Management Group to a Special Committee of  the  Board
of   Directors  consisting  of  the  independent  directors.   The  Special
Committee has retained CS First Boston as its independent financial advisor
and has retained its own legal counsel to assist the Special Committee.

     The following Exhibits follow:

          Exhibit 1 - Class Action Petition, Case No. 95C219P
          Exhibit 2 - Press Release dated December 1, 1995


                          SIGNATURES

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.

                              NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date:  December 4, 1995       By: Troy Cook
                              Vice President and
                              Chief Financial Officer



        IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS
                     CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT


- -------------------------------x
HARBOR FINANCE PARTNERS, a     :
Colorado Partnership,          :   C.A. No. 95C219P
                               :
                Plaintiff,     :
                               :
    - against -                :
                               :
NPC INTERNATIONAL INC.,        :
O.G. BICKNELL, MARY M. PULFER, :   CLASS ACTION PETITION
J.W CARLIN, R.E. CRESSLER,     :  (Pursuant to K.S.A. Chapter 60)
and F.D. JABARA                :
                               :
                Defendants.    :
- -------------------------------x


         Plaintiff, by its attorneys, alleges upon personal knowledge as to
itself  and  its own acts, and upon information and belief based  upon  the
investigation conducted by counsel, as follows:

                            SUMMARY OF THE ACTION
         
              Plaintiff  brings this action individually  and  as  a  class
action  on  behalf  of  all  persons, other than defendants,  who  own  the
securities of NPC International Inc. (``NPC`` or the ``Company``), and  who
are  similarly  situated and who have been deprived of the  opportunity  to
maximize the value of their shares by defendants` breach of fiduciary  duty
(the  ``Class``) in relation to the proposed management-led ``squeeze out``
acquisition of NPC (as described below).

                                   PARTIES

1.   Plaintiff Harbor Finance Partners is the owner of shares of NPC common
stock.

2.    DefendAnt NPC is a corporation duly organized and existing under  the
laws  of  the  State  of  Kansas.  NPC is the  world`s  largest  Pizza  Hut
franchisee  and currently operates 370 Pizza Hut restaurants  and  delivery
kitchens  in 11 states.  Additionally, the Company operates and  franchises
116 Skipper`s quick service seafood restaurants in seven western states and
British  Columbia.   NPC  also  operates and  franchises  170  Tony  Roma`s
restaurants,  the  casual theme restaurant ``Famous for  Ribs``  worldwide.
The  Company  maintains its principal executive offices at  720  West  20th
Street,  Pittsburg,  Kansas  66762.   NPC  stock  trades  on  the  National
Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system (NASDAQ).

3.   Defendant O.G. Bicknell is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of
the Company and the Chief Executive Officer.  He beneficially owns 62% of
the Company`s outstanding stock.

4.   Defendants Mary M. Pulfer, J.W. Carlin, R.E. Cressler, and F.D. Jabara
are directors of NPC.

5.   Because of their positions as directors of the Company, the director
defendants owe a fiduciary duty of loyalty and due care to plaintiff and
the other members of the Class.

6.   Each defendant herein is sued individually and as a conspirator and
aider and abettor, as well as, where applicable, in his/her capacity as a
director of the Company.  The liability of each arises from the fact that
each has engaged in all or part of the unlawful acts, plans, schemes, or
transactions complained of herein.

                       CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

7.    Plaintiff brings this action on its own behalf and as a class action,
pursuant  to  K.S.A. Section 60-223, on behalf of all stockholders  of  the
Company, except defendants herein and any person, firm, trust, corporation,
or  other  entity related to or affiliated with any of the defendants,  who
will  be  threatened with injury arising from defendants` actions described
more fully below.

8.   This action is properly maintainable as a class action.

9.   According to the Company`s latest Form 10-Q, there are 24,507,324
shares of the Company outstanding.  Of those shares, 16,748,649 are owned
by officers and/or directors of the Company.

10.  The Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
The Company has over six thousand stockholders. The record holders of the
Company`s securities can be easily determined from the stock transfer
records maintained by NPC or its transfer agent.

11.  There are questions of law and fact common to the Class that
predominate over questions affecting any individual class member.  The
common questions include, inter alia, whether:
(a)   defendants  have engaged in conduct constituting unfair  dealing  and
have  engaged  in  a  plan  and  scheme which harms  the  Company`s  public
stockholders;
(b)  defendants have prevented and are continuing to prevent plaintiff and
the Class from receiving the maximum value per share that could be
received;
(c)  defendants have breached or aided and abetted the breach of the
fiduciary and other common law duties owed by them to plaintiff and the
members of the Class;
(d)  the director defendants, as directors of NPC, have fulfilled, and are
capable of fulfilling, their fiduciary duties to plaintiff and the Class,
including their duties of entire fairness, loyalty, due care, and candor;

12.   Plaintiff is an adequate representative of the Class.   Plaintiff  is
committed  to  prosecuting  the action and has retained  competent  counsel
experienced  in litigation of this nature.  Plaintiff`s claims are  typical
of  the claims of the other members of the Class and plaintiff has the same
interests as the other members of the Class.

                               THE SQUEEZE OUT

13.           On November 6, 1995, the Company announced a merger proposal,
under  which a company controlled by an NPC management group would  acquire
all  of  NPC`s stock not owned by the group for $9 per share (the ``Squeeze
Out  Mergers``).  Thus, it will cost the management group approximately $70
million to buy out the public shareholders of the Company.

14.  As reported in the Dow Jones Newswire on November 6, 1995, the Company
has created a special committee of the outside members of NPC`s board which
will analyze the proposed Squeeze Out Merger.  As further reported in the
Dow Jones Newswire, the special committee has retained CS First Boston as a
financial advisor to assist the committee in evaluating the proposal.  The
fact that Bicknell beneficially owns 62% of the Company`s outstanding
stock, however, makes this special committee a mere pretense because of the
committee`s loyalty toward Bicknell.

15.  As reported in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times on
November 7, 1995, the management group behind the Squeeze Out Merger
consists of three persons:  Mr. Bicknell, Mr. James K. Schwartz, president
and chief operating officer of the Company, and Troy D. Cook, vice
president, finance and the Company`s chief financial officer.

16.  On July 19, 1995, the Business Wire reported that NPC had announced
record earnings for the first quarter ended June 27, 1995.  In the
announcement, Mr. Bicknell said ``[w]e are very pleased with this quarter`s
results and anticipate continued earnings growth throughout this fiscal
year.  We remain committed to the aggressive growth of our company and to
increasing stockholder value.``  In the announcement, Mr. Schwartz said
``[t]he successful rollout of Stuffed Crust pizza and continued earnings
growth at Tony Roma`s contributed to strong earnings for the quarter.``

                 CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY
                        DUTY AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS

1.     Plaintiff  reavers  and  incorporates  by  reference  all   previous
allegations.

2.    The  Squeeze  Out  Merger  price is not the  result  of  arm`s-length
negotiations but was fixed arbitrarily by defendant Bicknell and  those  he
controls, as part of an unlawful plan and scheme.

3.   Because the proposed transaction is a transaction commonly known as  a
``squeeze  out  merger,``  by  which a management  group  takes  a  company
private,  there is no incentive for the management group to pay a  suitable
price for the Company`s publicly-held shares.

4.    Defendants, in violation of their fiduciary obligations  to  maximize
stockholder value, have not considered other potential purchasers of NPC or
its  stock  in a manner designed to obtain the highest possible  price  for
NPC`s public stockholders.

5.    The  proposed Squeeze Out Merger is wrongful, unfair, and harmful  to
the  Company`s public stockholders, and represents an attempt by defendants
to  aggrandize their personal and financial positions and interests and  to
enrich  themselves, at the expense of and to the detriment  of  the  public
stockholders  of  the Company.  The proposed Squeeze Out Merger  will  deny
class  members  their right to share proportionately in the true  value  of
NPC`s  valuable assets, profitable business, and future growth  in  profits
and earnings, while usurping the same for the benefit of the defendants  at
an unfair and inadequate price.

6.   Defendants herein have willfully participated in unfair dealing toward
plaintiff  and  the  other members of the Class and  have  engaged  in  and
substantially  assisted and aided and abetted each other in breach  of  the
fiduciary duties owed by them to the Class.

7.    By  the  acts,  transactions and courses of conduct  alleged  herein,
defendants, individually and as part of a common plan and scheme in  breach
of  their  fiduciary  duties  to plaintiff and the  Class,  are  attempting
unfairly  to  deprive  plaintiff  and  the  Class  of  consideration  in  a
transaction which could provide them with the opportunity to maximize their
investment in NPC.

8.    In  seeking to close the Squeeze Out Merger, without seeking possible
third  party buyers, defendants have violated the fiduciary duties owed  to
the  public  shareholders  of the Company and have  placed  their  personal
interests  ahead  of  the interests of the Company`s  public  shareholders.
Defendants  are  using  their positions as directors  for  the  purpose  of
pursuing their own agenda, all to the detriment of plaintiff and the Class.

9.   The defendants have not, in accordance with their fiduciary duties:
(a)   acted  independently so that the interests of  the  Company`s  public
shareholders would be protected;
(b)   adequately  ensured that no conflicts of interest exist  or  if  such
conflicts exist to ensure that all conflicts would be resolved in the  best
interests of the Company`s public shareholders; and
(c)   taken  all  appropriate  steps to enhance  the  Company`s  value  and
attractiveness  as a merger, acquisition, restructuring or recapitalization
candidate.

10.  Because the director defendants, and especially Bicknell, dominate the
business  affairs  of  the  Company,  and  are  in  possession  of  private
information concerning the Company`s assets, business and future prospects,
there exists an imbalance of knowledge and economic power between them  and
the public stockholders of the Company which makes it inherently unfair for
them  to  seek  to  close the Agreement at the expense  of  their  duty  to
maximize stockholder value for the Company`s public shareholders.

11.  As a result of the actions of defendants, plaintiff and the Class have
been  and will be damaged in that they have not and will not receive  their
fair  proportion of the value of the Company`s assets and business.   As  a
practical matter, no third party will bid for the Company when the  Squeeze
Out Merger has been met with such affinity.

12.  Plaintiff and the Class have no adequate remedy at law.

               THEREFORE,  plaintiff  prays  for  judgment  and  relief  as
follows:

(a)   declaring that this action is properly maintainable as a class action
and certifying plaintiff as representative of the Class;

(b)   ordering the director defendants to discharge their fiduciary  duties
to  plaintiff  and  the  other members of the  Class  by  announcing  their
intentions to;
  (a)   act independently on a fully informed basis in the best interests  of
the Company`s public shareholders;
  (b)   undertake an appropriate evaluation of NPC as a merger or acquisition
candidate;
  (c)   take  all  appropriate  steps  to enhance  the  Company`s  value  and
attractiveness as a merger or acquisition candidate;
  (d)   cooperate with ail persons having a bona fide interest  in  proposing
any transaction which would maximize shareholder value;
  (e)  take all steps to create an active auction for the Company in order to
maximize shareholder value;
  (f)   adequately  ensure  that  no  conflicts  of  interest  exist  between
defendants`  own  interests  and  their fiduciary  obligation  to  maximize
shareholder  value  or, if such conflicts exist, to ensure  that  all  such
conflicts a e resolved in favor of the Company`s public shareholders.

(c)  declaring that the defendants and each of them have committed or aided
and abetted a gross abuse of trust and have breached their fiduciary duties
to plaintiff and the other members of the class;

(d)  ordering defendants to permit a stockholders` committee consisting  of
Class  members  and  their representatives to participate  in  any  process
undertaken in connection with the sale of the Company in order to ensure  a
fair  procedure, adequate procedural safe-guards, and independent input  by
plaintiff  and the Class in connection with any transaction for the  public
shares of NPC;

(e)    awarding  compensatory  damages  against  defendants,  jointly   and
severally,  in  an  amount  to  be  determined  at  trial,  together   with
prejudgment interest at the maximum rate allowable by law;

(f)   awarding  plaintiff and the Class their costs and  disbursements  and
reasonable  allowances  for  plaintiff`s  counsel  and  experts`  fees  and
expenses; and

(g)  granting such other and further relief as may be just and proper.

Dated: November 8, 1995
                             ZACKERY E. REYNOLDS
                             102 South National
                             P.O. Box 32
                             Fort Scott, Kansas



                             By:
                                  Zackery E. Reynolds
                                  Attorneys for Plaintiff


Of Counsel:

WECHSLER HARWOOD
  HALEBIAN & FEFFER LLP
Joel C. Feffer
Jorn A. Holl, Esq.
805 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 935-7400

11147597

                                                   Contact:  David G. Short
                                         Vice President Legal and Secretary
                                                             (214) 343-7886
                                                                           

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



                          NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                  ANNOUNCES FILING OF ADDITIONAL PETITION
                                     

      PITTSBURG,  Kansas  (December  1, 1995)  -  NPC  International,  Inc.
announced  today that it was served on November 28, 1995,  with  an  action
which  was filed in the District Court of Crawford County, Kansas by Harbor
Finance Partners, a Colorado partnership, against NPC International,  Inc.,
and  certain directors of the Company.  The suit seeks class action status,
injunctive  relief, unspecified monetary damages and attorney fees  arising
from  the  proposal  of  Mr. Bicknell, Chairman  of  the  Board  and  Chief
Executive  Officer,  James  K.  Schwartz,  President  and  Chief  Operating
Officer,  and  Troy  D. Cook, Vice President Finance  and  Chief  Financial
Officer  (the  ``Management Group``) to purchase the publicly  held  common
stock  of  the  Company  for $9.00 per share.  On November  15,  1995,  the
Company  announced  the  filing  of a lawsuit  in  the  District  Court  of
Wyandotte  County,  Kansas  which  makes  similar  allegations  and   seeks
comparable  relief.  The Company believes that both of these  lawsuits  are
without merit and will defend against them vigorously.

      NPC  has  delegated the authority to review and evaluate the proposed
transaction with the Management Group to a Special Committee of  the  Board
of   Directors  consisting  of  the  independent  directors.   The  Special
Committee has retained CS First Boston as its independent financial advisor
and has retained its own legal counsel to assist the Special Committee.

      NPC  International, Inc. is the world`s largest Pizza Hut  franchisee
and  currently operates 372 Pizza Hut restaurants and delivery kitchens  in
11 states.  Additionally, the Company operates and franchises 116 Skipper`s
quick  service  seafood  restaurants in seven western  states  and  British
Columbia.   NPC  also operates and franchises 171 Tony Roma`s  restaurants,
the casual theme restaurant Famous for Ribs, worldwide.

      The Company`s stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the
symbols ``NPCI``
                          *******************
                                   95-13


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission