<PAGE>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549-1004
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
-----------------------------------------------
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________________ to _____________________
Commission File Number 0-14122
-----------------------------------------------------
First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. - 3
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Florida 36-3330657
- ------------------------------- -----------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1100, Chicago, Illinois 60606-2607
- --------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (312) 207-0020
---------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
---------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partnership Units
-------------------------
</TABLE>
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
----- -----
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ x ]
Documents incorporated by reference:
The First Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership
filed as Exhibit A to the definitive Prospectus dated January 17, 1985, included
in the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11, is incorporated herein
by reference in Part IV of this report.
Exhibit Index - Page A-1
- ------------------------
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
- ------- --------
The registrant, First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd.-3 (the
"Partnership"), is a limited partnership organized in 1984 under the Florida
Uniform Limited Partnership Law. The Partnership sold 45,737 Limited
Partnership Units ("the Units") to the public from January 1985 to May 1986,
pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (Registration Statement No. 2-94419). Capitalized terms
used in this report have the same meaning as those terms have in the
Partnership's Registration Statement.
The business of the Partnership is to invest primarily in existing, or to-be-
developed income-producing real estate, such as shopping centers, warehouses and
office buildings, and, to a lesser extent, in other types of income-producing
real estate. From March 1986 to March 1989, the Partnership purchased 50%
interests in three joint ventures and a 25% interest in one joint venture each
with Affiliated partnerships. Two of the 50% joint ventures and the 25% joint
venture were each formed for the purpose of acquiring a 100% interest in certain
real property and one 50% joint venture was formed for the purpose of
participating in a mortgage loan investment, which was recognized as of July 1,
1990 as being foreclosed in-substance and was recorded as two real property
investments. In addition, in January 1987 the Partnership formed a joint
venture with an Affiliated partnership (the "Joint Venture"), in which they are
each 50% partners. The Joint Venture was formed for the purpose of entering
into a limited partnership with an unaffiliated third party to which the Joint
Venture contributed 75% of the total purchase price of a property in order to
obtain a preferred majority interest in the limited partnership. All of the
Partnership's joint ventures, prior to dissolution, are operated under the
common control of First Capital Financial Corporation (the "General Partner").
Through December 31, 1996, the Partnership and its Affiliate have dissolved the
50% joint venture which was originally formed for the purpose of participating
in a mortgage loan investment, as a result of the sale and/or disposition of the
two real property investments.
Property management services for the Partnership's real estate investments are
provided by an Affiliate of the General Partner for fees calculated as a
percentage of gross rents received from the properties.
The real estate business is highly competitive. The results of operations of
the Partnership will depend upon the availability of suitable tenants, real
estate market conditions and general economic conditions which may impact the
success of these tenants. Properties owned by the Partnership frequently
compete for tenants with similar properties owned by others.
As of March 1, 1997 there were sixteen employees at the Partnership's properties
for on-site property maintenance and administration.
2
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
- ------- ----------
As of December 31, 1996, the Partnership owned through joint ventures the
following four property interests, all of which were owned in fee simple.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Leasable Number of
Property Name Location Sq. Footage Tenants (c)
- --------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------ -----------
Office Buildings:
- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Holiday Office Park North and South (d) Lansing, Michigan 398,228 79 (1)
Park Plaza Professional Building (50%) Houston, Texas 177,395 64 (1)
Ellis Building (50%) Sarasota, Florida 130,189 31 (2)
3120 Southwest Freeway (25%) (e) Houston, Texas 89,346 39
</TABLE>
(a) For a discussion of significant operating results and major capital
expenditures planned for the Partnership's properties refer to
Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
(b) For Federal income tax purposes, the Partnership depreciates the
portion of the acquisition costs of its properties allocable to real
property (exclusive of land) and all improvements thereafter, over
useful lives ranging from 19 years utilizing Accelerated Cost Recovery
System to 40 years utilizing the straight-line method. The
Partnership's portion of real estate taxes for Park Plaza Professional
Building ("Park Plaza"), Holiday Office Park North and South
("Holiday") and the Ellis Building ("Ellis"), the Partnership's most
significant properties, was $235,400, $189,400 and $80,000,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1996. In the opinion of
the General Partner, the Partnership's properties are adequately
insured and serviced by all necessary utilities.
(c) Represents the total number of tenants, as well as the number of
tenants, in parenthesis, that individually occupy more than 10% of the
net leasable square footage of the property.
(d) The Partnership owns a 50% interest in a joint venture which owns a
75% preferred majority interest in this property.
(e) This property was sold on February 18, 1997
The following table presents each of the Partnership's most significant
properties' occupancy rates as of December 31 for each of the last five years:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Property Name 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- --------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Holiday 85% 82% 73% 84% 76%
Park Plaza 83% 86% 90% 91% 91%
Ellis 97% 93% 95% 86% 96%
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (continued)
- ------- ----------
The amounts in the following table represent each of the Partnership's most
significant properties' average annual rental rate per square foot for each of
the last five years ended December 31 which were computed by dividing each
property's base rental revenues by its average occupied square footage:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Property Name 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Park Plaza $17.16 $18.16 $18.44 $17.65 $16.99
Ellis Building $13.96 $13.79 $13.32 $13.08 $12.57
Holiday $ 9.09 $ 8.86 $ 9.32 $ 8.57 $ 8.36
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes the principal provisions of the leases for the
tenants which occupy ten percent or more of the rentable square footage at each
of the Partnership's most significant properties:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Partnership's Share of per Percentage
annum Base Rents (a) for of Net Renewal
-------------------------- Leasable Options
Final Twelve Expiration Square (Renewal
Months of Date of Footage Options /
1997 Lease Lease Occupied Years)
--------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Holiday
- -------
Michigan Public Service
Commission
(state government $ 373,700 $ 373,700 8/31/2000 18% None
administration)
Park Plaza
- ----------
AMI Park Plaza Hospital
(health care services) $ 118,600 $ 118,600 11/30/2001 11% None
Ellis
- -----
NationsBank
(bank) $ 407,300 $ 408,800 3/9/01 43% 4/5
University Club
(restaurant/banquet
facility) $ 50,300 $ 50,300 4/28/01 10% None
</TABLE>
(a) The Partnership's share of per annum base rents for each of the tenants
listed above for each of the years between 1997 and the final twelve
months of each of the above leases is no lesser or greater than the
amounts listed in the above table.
4
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (continued)
- ------- ----------
The amounts in the following table represent the Partnership's portion of base
rental income from leases in the year of expiration (assuming no lease renewals)
for the Partnership's most significant properties through the year ended
December 31, 2005:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number Base Rents in Year % of Total Base
Year of Tenants Square Feet of Expiration (a) Rents (b)
- ---- ---------- ----------- ------------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1997 33 60,832 $218,300 6.19%
1998 40 76,153 $306,200 9.78%
1999 38 85,075 $265,600 10.68%
2000 19 131,225 $488,400 24.64%
2001 28 178,226 $351,700 51.57%
2002 8 35,316 $153,500 53.36%
2003 None None None 0.00%
2004 1 10,520 $ 40,300 49.71%
2005 1 3,709 $ 37,400 100.00%
</TABLE>
(a) Represents the Partnership's portion of base rents to be collected
each year on expiring leases.
(b) Represents the Partnership's portion of base rents to be collected
each year on expiring leases as a percentage of the Partnership's
portion of the total base rents to be collected on leases existing as
of December 31, 1996.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
- ------- -----------------
(a & b) The Partnership and its properties were not a party to, nor the subject
of, any material pending legal proceedings, nor were any such proceedings
terminated during the quarter ended December 31, 1996. Ordinary routine
litigation incidental to the business which is not deemed material was pursued
during the quarter ended December 31, 1996.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
- ------- ---------------------------------------------------
(a,b,c & d) None.
5
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S EQUITY AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS
- ------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has not been, nor is there expected to be, a public market for Units.
As of March 1, 1997, there were 7,097 Holders of Units.
6
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues $ 3,521,400 $ 3,671,800 $ 3,761,600 $ 3,916,100 $ 4,263,800
Net income (loss) $ 1,358,900 $ (605,600) $(1,019,100) $ 1,032,000 $(2,487,800)
Net income (loss)
allocated to Limited
Partners $ 1,145,500 $ (854,900) $(1,159,500) $ 977,900 $(2,462,900)
Net income (loss)
allocated to Limited
Partners per Unit
(45,737 Units
outstanding) (a) $ 25.05 $ (18.69) $ (25.35) $ 21.38 $ (53.85)
Total assets $23,896,300 $27,076,600 $30,120,200 $32,409,600 $35,171,600
Mortgage loan payable None None None None $ 2,419,000
Distributions to Limited
Partners per Unit
(45,737 Units
outstanding) (b) $ 85.73 $ 53.00 $ 30.67 $ 29.05 None
Return of capital to
Limited Partners per
Unit (45,737 Units
outstanding) (c) $ 60.68 $ 53.00 $ 30.67 $ 7.67 None
OTHER DATA:
Investment in:
Commercial rental
properties (net of
accumulated
depreciation and
amortization) $13,123,300 $13,525,100 $15,597,800 $19,577,300 $22,700,600
Real estate joint
venture $ 4,937,100 $ 4,620,200 $ 5,234,600 $ 6,022,300 $ 6,401,700
Number of real property
interests owned at
December 31 4 4 4 5 5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Net income (loss) allocated to Limited Partners per Unit for 1993 and 1992
included an extraordinary gain on extinguishment of debt.
(b) Distributions to Limited Partners per Unit for the year ended December 31,
1996 and 1993 included Sale Proceeds of $43.73 and $18.45, respectively.
(c) For the purposes of this table, return of capital represents either: 1) the
amount by which distributions, if any, exceed net income for the respective
year or 2) total distributions, if any, when the Partnership incurs a net
loss for the respective year. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,
Capital Investment is only reduced by distributions of Sale Proceeds.
Accordingly, return of capital as used in the above table does not impact
Capital Investment.
The following table includes a reconciliation of Cash Flow (as defined in the
Partnership Agreement) to cash flow provided by operating activities as
determined by generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flow (as defined in
the Partnership
Agreement) (a) $ 2,273,500 $ 2,433,900 $ 2,425,700 $ 2,164,900 $1,795,300
Items of reconciliation:
Cash Flow from joint
venture (574,700) (490,900) (493,000) (471,800) (269,400)
Changes in current
assets and
liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in
current assets (28,800) (4,700) 69,200 162,700 (35,200)
(Decrease) increase in
current liabilities (55,200) 98,700 (120,200) 38,500 263,400
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by
operating activities $ 1,614,800 $ 2,037,000 $ 1,881,700 $ 1,894,300 $1,754,100
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used for)
provided by investing
activities $ (403,800) $ 79,000 $ 1,880,200 $ 31,000 $ (672,300)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used for)
financing activities $(4,484,000) $(2,536,700) $(1,150,100) $(1,249,100) $ (119,200)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) Cash Flow is defined in the Partnership Agreement as Partnership revenues
earned from operations (excluding tenant deposits and proceeds from the
sale or disposition of any Partnership properties), minus all expenses
incurred (including Operating Expenses and any reserves of revenues from
operations deemed reasonably necessary by the General Partner), except
depreciation and amortization expenses and capital expenditures, lease
acquisition expenditures and the General Partner's Partnership Management
Fee.
The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the related notes appearing on pages A-1 through A-8
in this report and the supplemental schedule on pages A-9 and A-10.
7
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The ordinary business of the Partnership is expected to pass through three
phases: (i) Offering of Units and investment in properties, (ii) operation of
properties and (iii) sale or other disposition of properties.
The Partnership commenced the Offering of Units in January 1985 and began
operations on March 4, 1985, after achieving the minimum subscription level. In
May 1986, the Offering was terminated upon the sale of 45,737 Units. From March
1986 to March 1989, the Partnership purchased 50% interests in three joint
ventures and a 25% interest in one joint venture each with Affiliated
partnerships. Two of the 50% joint ventures and the 25% joint venture were each
formed for the purpose of acquiring a 100% interest in certain real property
and one 50% joint venture was formed for the purpose of participating in a
mortgage loan investment, which was recognized as of July 1, 1990 as being
foreclosed in-substance and was recorded as two real property investments
(individually referred to as "Wellington" and "North Valley"). In addition, in
January 1987 the Partnership formed a joint venture with an Affiliated
partnership (the "Joint Venture"), in which they are each 50% partners. The
Joint Venture was formed for the purpose of entering into a limited partnership
agreement with an unaffiliated third party to which the Joint Venture
contributed 75% of the total purchase price of a property in order to obtain a
preferred majority interest in the limited partnership. All of the
Partnership's joint ventures, prior to dissolution, are operated under the
common control of First Capital Financial Corporation (the "General Partner").
One of the Partnership's objectives is to dispose of its properties when market
conditions allow for the achievement of the maximum possible sales price. In
1992 the Partnership, in addition to being in the operation of properties
phase, entered the disposition phase of its life cycle with the disposal of
North Valley as a result of a conveyance of title to the mortgage holder in
lieu of foreclosure. During the disposition phase of the Partnership's life
cycle, comparisons of operating results are complicated due to the timing and
effect of property sales and dispositions. Partnership operating results are
generally expected to decline as real property interests are sold or disposed
of since the Partnership no longer receives income generated from such real
property interests. Through December 31, 1996, the Partnership and its
Affiliate have dissolved the 50% joint venture which was originally formed for
the purpose of participating in a mortgage loan investment as a result of the
sale and/or disposition of three buildings at Wellington and the disposal of
North Valley.
OPERATIONS
The table below is a recap of certain operating results of each of the
Partnership's properties for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.
The discussion following the table should be read in conjunction with the
Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing in this report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Partnership's share of
Comparative Operating Results
(a)
For the Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
PARK PLAZA PROFESSIONAL BUILDING (50%)
Rental revenues $1,666,700 $1,699,300 $1,815,400
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Property net income (b) $ 327,400 $ 395,700 $ 483,100
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Average occupancy 84% 87% 89%
- ------------------------------------------------------------
ELLIS BUILDING (50%)
Rental revenues $1,182,700 $1,121,400 $1,118,300
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Property net income (b) $ 373,600 $ 289,400 $ 324,900
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Average occupancy 95% 93% 94%
- ------------------------------------------------------------
3120 SOUTHWEST FREEWAY OFFICE BUILDING (25%)
Rental revenues $ 219,300 $ 235,700 $ 237,700
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Property net income (b) $ 7,900 $ 15,000 $ 15,600
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Average occupancy 85% 91% 91%
- ------------------------------------------------------------
HOLIDAY OFFICE PARK NORTH AND SOUTH (50%)
Rental revenues $1,585,300 $1,410,400 $1,464,300
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Property net income (b) $ 383,300 $ 279,000 $ 202,600
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Average occupancy 84% 79% 79%
- ------------------------------------------------------------
WELLINGTON NORTH OFFICE COMPLEX (C)
Rental revenues $ 215,400
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Property net income $ 5,300
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Average occupancy 90%
- ------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) The above table excludes certain income and expense items which are either
not directly related to individual property operating results such as
interest income, general and administrative expenses or are related to
properties previously owned by the Partnership. The Partnership's share of
results from its participation in a Joint Venture, treated on the equity
method, is included above.
(b) Property net income excludes provisions for value impairment included in
the Statements of Income and Expenses for the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1994. See Note 8 of Notes to Financial Statements for further
information.
(c) Wellington C of the Wellington North Office Complex ("Wellington C") was
sold on June 8, 1994. Property net income excludes the (loss) on the sale
of the property of $(48,900) which was included in the Statement of Income
and Expenses for the year ended December 31, 1994. For additional
information, see Note 7 of Notes to the Financial Statements.
8
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(CONTINUED)
COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1995
Net results for the Partnership improved by $1,964,500 for the year ended
December 31, 1996 when compared to the year ended December 31, 1995. The
improvement was primarily the result of $2,000,000 recorded as provisions for
value impairment during 1995, which included $400,000 which was recorded in the
Partnership's equity interest in Holiday Office Park North and South
("Holiday"). Exclusive of provisions for value impairment, net income decreased
by $35,500. The decrease was primarily the result of decreased interest income
earned on the Partnership's short-term investments due to a decrease in the
average amount invested and a decrease in the rates available on such
investments. Also contributing to the decrease were diminished operating
results at Park Plaza Professional Building ("Park Plaza") and 3120 Southwest
Freeway Office Building ("Southwest Freeway"). The decrease was partially
offset by improved operating results at Ellis Building ("Ellis") and Holiday.
Rental revenues remained relatively unchanged for the years under comparison.
The increase in rental revenues at Ellis, which was due to an increase in
occupancy, was offset by decreases at Park Plaza and Southwest Freeway, which
were the result of decreases in the occupancy and base rental rates.
Depreciation and amortization decreased by $104,400 for the year ended December
31, 1996 when compared to the year ended December 31 ,1995. The decrease was
primarily due to the effects of the provisions for value impairment recorded
for all of the Partnership's properties during the year ended December 31,
1995.
Property operating expense increased by $53,200 for the year ended December 31,
1996 when compared to the year ended December 31, 1995. The increase was
primarily the result of increases in salaries and utility expense at Park Plaza
along with an increase in utility expense at Ellis, partially offset by a
decrease in advertising and promotion expense at Southwest Freeway.
Repairs and maintenance expense increased by $38,900 for the years under
comparison. The primary factor which caused the increase was increased
expenditures associated with the parking facility at Park Plaza and increase
maintenance staff salaries at all of the Partnership's properties resulting
from continuing efforts to improve the overall appearance and operating
efficiency of the properties. Partially offsetting the increases was a decrease
in repairs to the HVAC unit at Park Plaza.
Real estate taxes and insurance remained relatively unchanged for the years
under comparison.
The Partnership's share of net income from Holiday, exclusive of the provision
for value impairment of $400,000 recorded during 1995, increased by $104,300
for the years under comparison. The increase was primarily the result of
increased rental revenues due to an increase in occupancy and rental rates. The
increase was partially offset by increased property operating and repairs and
maintenance expenses.
COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1994
Net (loss) for the Partnership decreased by $413,500 for the year ended
December 31, 1995 when compared to the year ended December 31, 1994. The
effects of the provisions for value impairment reported for the years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1994, together with the 1994 sale of Wellington C had a
significant impact on the Partnership's results for the comparable years. For
the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 the Partnership reported provisions
for value impairment of $2,000,000 and $2,172,400, respectively, which includes
the provisions recorded on the Partnership's equity investment in Holiday. The
Partnership's Statement of Income and Expenses for the year ended December 31,
1994 included a net (loss) of $(43,600) (which includes property operating
income of $5,300) from Wellington C (for further information see Note 7 of
Notes to Financial Statements).
Exclusive of the effects of Wellington C and provisions for value impairment,
the Partnership generated net income of $1,394,400 for the year ended December
31, 1995, a $192,200 increase when compared to the year ended December 31,
1994. The primary reasons for the increase in net income were increased
interest income due to an increase in rates available on the Partnership's
short-term investments and increased income from the Partnership's equity
investment in the joint venture which owns Holiday. Partially offsetting the
increases in net income were decreased operating results at Ellis, Park Plaza
and Southwest Freeway.
For purposes of the following comparative discussion, the operating results of
Wellington C have been excluded.
Rental revenues decreased by $115,000 or 3.6% for the year ended December 31,
1995 when compared to the year ended December 31, 1994. The primary factor
which caused the decrease was a decrease in rental revenues at Park Plaza
resulting from the uncertainties surrounding the industry of the majority of
its tenants, health care. In order to maintain occupancy levels at Park Plaza,
in 1994 the Partnership began to offer to new and renewing tenants reduced
rental rates and the use of the current year as a base year for tenant expense
reimbursements. Accordingly, rental revenues at Park Plaza have decreased due
to the lower effective rental rate charged to new and renewing tenants and
lower tenant expense reimbursements. Rental revenues also decreased at Park
Plaza due to a reduction in lease settlement fees received in 1995 as compared
to 1994.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $40,500 for the years under
comparison primarily as a result of the effects of the provisions for value
impairment recorded at Park Plaza and Ellis during the year ended December 31,
1994.
Real estate tax expense increased by $51,600 for the years under comparison
primarily due to increases at Park Plaza and Southwest Freeway as a result of
projected increases in assessed property valuations and tax rates.
Exclusive of the provisions for value impairment, the Partnership's share of
net income at Holiday increased by $76,400 for the year ended December 31, 1995
when compared to the year ended December 31, 1994. The increase in net income
was due to decreased repairs and maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance
expenses. Partially offsetting the increase in net income was decreased rental
revenues.
To increase and/or maintain occupancy levels at the Partnership's properties,
the General Partner, through its affiliated asset and property management
groups, continues to take the following actions: 1) implementation of marketing
programs, including hiring of third-party leasing agents or providing on-site
leasing personnel, advertising, direct mail campaigns and development of
building brochures; 2) early renewal of existing tenants and addressing any
expansion needs these tenants may have; 3) promotion of local broker
9
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(CONTINUED)
events and networking with local brokers; 4) cold-calling other businesses and
tenants in the market area; and 5) providing rental concessions or
competitively pricing rental rates depending on market conditions.
The rate of inflation has remained relatively stable during the years under
comparison and has had a minimal impact on the operating results of the
Partnership. The nature of various tenants' lease clauses protects the
Partnership, to some extent, from increases in the rate of inflation. Certain
of the lease clauses provide for the following: 1) annual rent increases based
on the Consumer Price Index or graduated rental increases and 2) total or
partial tenant reimbursement of property operating expenses (e.g., common area
maintenance, real estate taxes, etc.).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
A primary objective of the Partnership is to provide cash distributions to
Partners from Partnership operations. Cash Flow (as defined in the Partnership
Agreement) is generally not equal to Partnership net income or cash flow as
defined by GAAP, since certain items are treated differently under the
Partnership Agreement than under GAAP. The General Partner believes that to
facilitate a clear understanding of the Partnership's operations, an analysis
of Cash Flow (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) should be examined in
conjunction with an analysis of net income or cash flow as defined by GAAP. The
second table in Selected Financial Data includes a reconciliation of Cash Flow
(as defined in the Partnership Agreement) to cash flow provided by operating
activities as defined by GAAP. Such amounts are not indicative of actual
distributions to Partners and should not necessarily be considered as an
alternative to the results disclosed in the Statements of Income and Expenses
and Statements of Cash Flows.
The decrease in Cash Flow (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) of $160,400
for the year ended December 31, 1996 when compared to year ended December 31,
1995 was primarily due to the decreases in interest income, as previously
discussed, and operating results, exclusive of depreciation and amortization,
at Park Plaza.
The decrease in the Partnership's cash position of $3,273,000 during the year
ended December 31, 1996 was primarily the result of distributions paid to
Partners and payments for capital and tenant improvements and leasing costs
exceeding net cash provided by operating activities. Liquid assets (including
cash and cash equivalents) of the Partnership are comprised of amounts held for
working capital purposes. In addition, the Partnership's undistributed share of
cash and cash equivalents at Holiday approximated $419,000, as of December 31,
1996.
The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities of $422,200 for the
year ended December 31, 1996 when compared to the year ended December 31, 1995
was primarily due to a decrease in operating results, excluding depreciation
and amortization, at all of the Partnership's properties and to a lesser extent
to the timing of the payment of expenses, most notably at Ellis.
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities changed from $79,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1995 to $(403,800) for the year ended December 31,
1996. The change was primarily due to reductions in distributions from the
Partnership's equity investment in Holiday. The General Partner anticipates the
receipt of cash distributions during 1997 which will include cash generated by
Holiday during 1996. Partially offsetting this was a slight decrease in
payments made for building and tenant improvements and leasing costs at the
Partnership's properties. The Partnership maintains working capital reserves to
pay for capital expenditures such as capital and tenant improvements and
leasing costs. During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Partnership spent
$321,400 for capital and tenant improvements and leasing costs and has budgeted
to spend approximately $300,000 during 1997. Of the budgeted amount,
approximately $175,000 and $125,000 relates to anticipated improvement and
leasing costs expected to be incurred at Ellis and Park Plaza, respectively. In
addition, the Partnership's share of amounts spent by Holiday during 1996
amounted to $448,900. The Partnership's share of amounts budgeted to be spent
at Holiday in 1997 is approximately $225,000. Actual amounts expended may vary
depending on a number of factors including leasing activity and other market
conditions throughout the year. The General Partner believes these expenditures
are necessary to maintain occupancy levels in very competitive markets,
maximize rental rates charged to new and renewing tenants and prepare the
remaining properties for eventual disposition.
The increase in net cash used for financing activities of $1,947,300 for the
year ended December 31, 1996 when compared to the year ended December 31, 1995
was due primarily to a special distribution of Sales Proceeds. As a result of
the performance of the Partnership's remaining properties, the General Partner
determined that Sales Proceeds previously reserved for working capital purposes
could be distributed to the Limited Partners. Accordingly, the Partnership
declared a special distribution in the amount of $2,000,100, or $43.73 per
Unit, to Limited Partners of record as of October 1, 1996. This special
distribution was included with the third quarter distribution to Limited
Partners on November 30, 1996.
On February 18, 1997, the joint venture in which the Partnership owns a 25%
interest completed the sale of Southwest Freeway. The Partnership's share of
the net sales proceeds from this sale approximated $822,800. The Partnership
will distribute $822,800, or $17.99 per Unit, on May 31, 1997, to Limited
Partners of record as of February 18, 1997. For further information, see Note 9
in Notes to Financial Statements.
The General Partner continues to take a conservative approach to projections of
future rental income and to maintain higher levels of cash reserves due to the
anticipated capital and tenant improvements and leasing costs necessary to be
made at the Partnership's properties during the next several years. For the
year ended December 31, 1996, Cash Flow (as defined in the Partnership
Agreement) retained to supplement working capital reserves was $139,200.
Distributions to Limited Partners for the quarter ended December 31, 1996 were
declared in the amount of $320,200, or $7.00 per Unit. Cash distributions are
made 60 days after the last day of each fiscal quarter. The amount of future
distributions to Partners will ultimately be dependent upon the performance of
the Partnership's investments as well as the General Partner's determination of
the amount of cash necessary to supplement working capital reserves to meet
future liquidity requirements of the Partnership. Accordingly, with the
exception of the distribution of Sales Proceeds of $822,800 on May 31, 1997,
there can be no assurance as to the amounts of cash for future distribution to
Partners.
10
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
- ------- -------------------------------------------
The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this report. See
page A-1 "Index of Financial Statements, Schedule and Exhibits".
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
- ------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
--------------------
None.
11
<PAGE>
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
- -------- --------------------------------------------------
(a) DIRECTORS
---------
The Partnership has no directors. First Capital Financial Corporation
("FCFC") is the General Partner. The Directors of FCFC, as of March 28,
1997, are shown in the table below. Directors serve for one year or until
their successors are elected. The next annual meeting of FCFC will be held
in June 1997.
Name Office
---- ------
Samuel Zell.......................................Chairman of the Board
Douglas Crocker II................................Director
Sheli Z. Rosenberg................................Director
Samuel Zell, 55, has been a Director of the General Partner since 1983
(Chairman of the Board since December 1985) and is Chairman of the Board of
Equity Financial and Management Company ("EFMC") and Equity Group
Investments, Inc. ("EGI"), and is a trustee and beneficiary of a general
partner of Equity Holdings Limited, an Illinois Limited Partnership, a
privately owned investment partnership. He is also Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Anixter International Inc., American Classic Voyages Co. and
Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. ("MHC"). He is Chairman of the Board of
Trustees of Equity Residential Properties Trust. He is a Director of Chart
House Enterprises, Inc., Ramco Energy plc, TeleTech Holdings, Inc., Quality
Food Centers, Inc. ("QFC") and Sealy Corporation. He is Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Capsure Holdings Corp.
and Co-Chairman of the Board of Revco D.S., Inc.
Douglas Crocker II, 56, has been President and Chief Executive Officer
since December 1992 and a Director since January 1993 of the General
Partner. Mr. Crocker has been an Executive Vice President of EFMC since
November 1992. Mr. Crocker has been President, Chief Executive Officer and
trustee of Equity Residential Properties Trust since March 31, 1993. He was
President of Republic Savings Bank, F.S.B. ("Republic") from 1989 to June
1992 at which time the Resolution Trust Company took control of Republic.
Mr. Crocker is a member of the Board of Directors of Horizon Group, Inc.
Sheli Z. Rosenberg, 55, was President and Chief Executive Officer of the
General Partner from December 1990 to December 1992 and has been a Director
of the General Partner since September 1983; was Executive Vice President
and General Counsel for EFMC from October 1980 to November 1994; has been
President and Chief Executive Officer of EFMC and EGI since November 1994;
has been a Director of Great American Management and Investment, Inc.
("Great American") since June 1984 and is a Director of various
subsidiaries of Great American. She is also a Director of Anixter
International Inc., Capsure Holdings Corp., American Classic Voyages Co.,
Jacor Communications, Inc., Revco D.S., Inc., Sealy Corporation, MHC and
QFC. She is also a trustee of Equity Residential Properties Trust. Ms.
Rosenberg is a Principal of Rosenberg & Liebentritt, P.C., counsel to the
Partnership, the General Partner and certain of their Affiliates. She has
been Vice President of First Capital Benefit Administrators, Inc. ("Benefit
Administrators") from July 22, 1987 until its liquidation in November 1995.
Benefit Administrators filed for protection under the Federal bankruptcy
laws on January 3, 1995.
12
<PAGE>
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT (Continued)
- -------- --------------------------------------------------
(b,c & e) EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
------------------
The Partnership does not have any executive officers. The executive
officers of the General Partner as of March 28, 1997 are shown in the table
below. All officers are elected to serve for one year or until their
successors are elected and qualified.
Name Office
---- ------
Douglas Crocker II...................President and Chief Executive Officer
Gus J. Athas.........................Vice President
Norman M. Field......................Vice President - Finance and Treasurer
PRESIDENT AND CEO - See Table of Directors above.
Gus J. Athas, 60, has been Senior Vice President of the General Partner
since March 1995. Mr. Athas has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Assistant Secretary of Great American since March 1995. Mr. Athas has
served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Falcon
Building Products, Inc. since March 1994 and served as Vice President and
Secretary from January 1994 to March 1994. Mr. Athas has served as Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Eagle Industries, Inc.
("Eagle") since May 1993. From September 1992 to May 1993, Mr. Athas was
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Eagle. From November 1987
to September 1992, Mr. Athas served as Vice President, General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary of Eagle.
Norman M. Field, 48, has been Vice President of Finance and Treasurer of
the General Partner since February 1984, and also served as Vice President
and Treasurer of Great American from July 1983 until March 1995. Mr. Field
had been Treasurer of Benefit Administrators from July 22, 1987 until its
liquidation in November 1995. Benefit Administrators filed for protection
under the Federal bankruptcy laws on January 3, 1995. He was Chief
Financial Officer of Equality Specialties, Inc. ("Equality"), a subsidiary
of Great American, from August 1994 to April 1995. Equality was sold in
April 1995.
(d) FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS
--------------------
There are no family relationships among any of the foregoing directors and
officers.
(f) INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
----------------------------------------
With the exception of the bankruptcy matter disclosed under Items 10 (a),
(b), (c) and (e), there are no involvements in certain legal proceedings
among any of the foregoing directors and officers.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
- -------- ----------------------
(a,b,c & d) As stated in Item 10, the Partnership has no officers or directors.
Neither the General Partner, nor any director or officer of the General Partner,
received any direct remuneration from the Partnership during the year ended
December 31, 1996. However, the General Partner and its Affiliates do
compensate the directors and officers of the General Partner. For additional
information see Item 13 (a) Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
(e) None.
13
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
- -------- --------------------------------------------------------------
(a) As of March 1, 1997, no person owned of record or was known by the
Partnership to own beneficially more than 5% of the Partnership's 45,737
Units then outstanding.
(b) The Partnership has no directors or executive officers as of March 1, 1997.
The executive officers and directors of First Capital Financial Corporation,
the General Partner, did not own any Units.
(c) None.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
- -------- ----------------------------------------------
(a) Affiliates of the General Partner provide leasing, supervisory and property
management services to the Partnership. Compensation for these property
management services may not exceed 6% of the gross receipts from the
property being managed where the General Partner or Affiliates provide
leasing, re-leasing, and/or leasing related services, or 3% of gross
receipts where the General Partner or Affiliates do not perform leasing,
re-leasing, and/or leasing related services for a particular property. For
the year ended December 31, 1996, these Affiliates were entitled to leasing
and property management fees of $174,600. In addition, other Affiliates of
the General Partner were entitled to receive $70,800 for fees, compensation
and reimbursements from the Partnership for personnel, mailing, insurance
and other miscellaneous services. Compensation for these services are on
terms which are fair, reasonable and no less favorable to the Partnership
than reasonably could be obtained from unaffiliated persons. A total of
$33,800 of these amounts was due to Affiliates as of December 31, 1996.
As of December 31, 1996, $40,200 was due to the General Partner for real
estate commissions earned in connection with the disposition and sale of
Partnership property. These commissions have been accrued but not paid.
Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, these commissions will not be
paid until such time as the Limited Partners have received cumulative
distributions of Sale or Financing Proceeds equal to 100% of their Original
Capital Contribution, plus a cumulative return (including all Cash Flow
which has been distributed to Limited Partners) of 6% simple interest per
annum on their Capital Investment from the initial date of investment.
Subsequent to May 16, 1986, the Termination of the Offering, the General
Partner is entitled to 10% of distributable Cash Flow (as defined in the
Partnership Agreement) as its Partnership Management Fee. This fee is to be
paid on a quarterly basis and any amounts not paid in any year may be
deferred and paid in subsequent years subject to certain limitations set
forth in the Partnership Agreement.
In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, subsequent to May 16, 1986,
the Termination of the Offering, the General Partner is entitled to 10% of
distributable Cash Flow (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) as a
Partnership Management Fee. In addition, Net Profits (exclusive of Net
Profits from the sale or disposition of Partnership properties) are
allocated to the General Partner in an amount equal to the greater of 1% of
such Net Profits or the Partnership Management Fee paid by the Partnership
to the General Partner and, the balance, if any, to the Limited Partners.
Net Losses (exclusive of Net Losses from the sale, disposition or provision
for value impairment of Partnership properties) are allocated 1% to the
General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners. Net Profits from the sale
or disposition of a Partnership property are allocated: first, prior to
giving effect to any distributions of Sale Proceeds from the transaction,
to all Partners with negative balances in their Capital Accounts, pro rata
in proportion to such respective negative balances, to the extent of the
total of such negative balances; second, to the General Partner, in an
14
<PAGE>
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
- ------- ----------------------------------------------
amount necessary to make the positive balance in its Capital Account equal
to the amount of Sale Proceeds to be distributed to the General Partner
with respect to the sale or disposition of such property; and third, the
balance, if any, to the Limited Partners. Net Losses from the sale,
disposition or provision for value impairment of Partnership properties are
allocated: first, after giving effect to any distributions of Sale Proceeds
from the transaction to all Partners with positive balances in their
Capital Accounts, pro rata in proportion to such respective positive
balances, to the extent of the total amount of such positive balances; and
second, the balance, if any, 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the
Limited Partners. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, there shall be
allocated to the General Partner not less than 1% of all items of
Partnership income, gain, loss, deduction and credit during the existence
of the Partnership. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the General
Partner was entitled to a Partnership Management Fee, and accordingly,
allocated Net Profits, of $213,400.
(b) Rosenberg & Liebentritt, P.C. ("Rosenberg"), serves as legal counsel to the
Partnership, the General Partner and certain of their Affiliates. Sheli Z.
Rosenberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
from December 1990 to December 1992 and a director of the General Partner
since September, 1983, is a Principal of Rosenberg. Compensation for these
services are on terms which are fair, reasonable and no less favorable to
the Partnership than reasonably could be obtained from unaffiliated
persons. Total legal fees earned by Rosenberg for the year ended December
31, 1996 was $6,200, of which $600 was due as of December 31, 1996.
(c) No management person is indebted to the Partnership.
(d) None.
15
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
- -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
(a,c & d) (1,2 & 3) See Index of Financial Statements, Schedule and Exhibits on
page A-1 of Form 10-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
There were no reports filed on Form 8-K for the quarter ended December 31, 1996.
16
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD. - 3
BY: FIRST CAPITAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
GENERAL PARTNER
Dated: March 28, 1997 By: /s/ DOUGLAS CROCKER II
-------------- ---------------------------------------------
DOUGLAS CROCKER II
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ SAMUEL ZELL March 28, 1997 Chairman of the Board and
- ------------------------- -------------- Director of the General Partner
SAMUEL ZELL
/s/ DOUGLAS CROCKER II March 28, 1997 President, Chief Executive Officer and
- ------------------------- -------------- Director of the General Partner
DOUGLAS CROCKER II
/s/ SHELI Z. ROSENBERG March 28, 1997 Director of the General Partner
- ------------------------- --------------
SHELI Z. ROSENBERG
/s/ GUS J. ATHAS March 28, 1997 Senior Vice President
- ------------------------- --------------
GUS J. ATHAS
/s/ NORMAN M. FIELD March 28, 1997 Vice President - Finance and Treasurer
- ------------------------- --------------
NORMAN M. FIELD
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE>
INDEX OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULE AND EXHIBITS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pages
-------------
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Auditors A-2
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 A-3
Statements of Partners' Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 A-3
Statements of Income and Expenses for the Years
Ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 A-4
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 A-4
Notes to Financial Statements A-5 to A-8
SCHEDULE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of
December 31, 1996 A-9 and A-10
</TABLE>
All other schedules have been omitted as inapplicable, or for the reason that
the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
EXHIBITS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
EXHIBITS (3 & 4) First Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited
Partnership as set forth on pages A-1 through A-33 of the Partnership's
definitive Prospectus dated January 17, 1985; as supplemented through March 4,
1986, Registration Statement No. 2-94419, filed pursuant to Rule 424 (b), is
incorporated herein by reference.
EXHIBIT (13) Annual Report to Shareholders
The 1995 Annual Report to Limited Partners is being sent under separate cover,
not as a filed document and not via EDGAR, for the information of the
commission.
EXHIBIT (27) Financial Data Schedule
A-1
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Partners
First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. - 3
Chicago, Illinois
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of First Capital Institutional
Real Estate, Ltd. - 3 as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
statements of income and expenses, partners' capital and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, and the financial
statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements
and schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of First Capital Institutional
Real Estate, Ltd. - 3 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 14, 1997
A-2
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD.--3
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 1996 and 1995
(All dollars rounded to nearest 00s)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Investment in commercial rental properties:
Land $ 1,908,600 $ 1,908,600
Buildings and improvements 17,789,600 17,468,200
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
19,698,200 19,376,800
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (6,574,900) (5,851,700)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total investment properties, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization 13,123,300 13,525,100
Cash and cash equivalents 4,749,200 8,022,200
Restricted cash 100,000 62,500
Rents receivable 45,700 29,600
Investment in joint venture 4,937,100 4,620,200
Other assets (including amounts due from joint
venture of $915,700 and $804,400, respectively) 941,000 817,000
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$23,896,300 $27,076,600
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 392,300 $ 469,300
Due to Affiliates 74,600 95,900
Security deposits 61,900 55,700
Other liabilities 47,500 4,400
Distributions payable 355,700 711,500
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
932,000 1,336,800
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' (deficit) capital:
General Partner (183,300) (183,300)
Limited Partners (45,737 Units issued and
outstanding) 23,147,600 25,923,100
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
22,964,300 25,739,800
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$23,896,300 $27,076,600
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
(All dollars rounded to nearest 00s)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
General Limited
Partner Partners Total
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Partners' (deficit) capital,
January 1, 1994 $(147,800) $31,764,300 $31,616,500
Net income (loss) for the year ended
December 31, 1994 140,400 (1,159,500) (1,019,100)
Distributions for the year ended
December 31, 1994 (155,900) (1,402,700) (1,558,600)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' (deficit) capital,
December 31, 1994 (163,300) 29,202,100 29,038,800
Net income (loss) for the year ended
December 31, 1995 249,300 (854,900) (605,600)
Distributions for the year ended
December 31, 1995 (269,300) (2,424,100) (2,693,400)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' (deficit) capital,
December 31, 1995 (183,300) 25,923,100 25,739,800
Net income for the year ended
December 31, 1996 213,400 1,145,500 1,358,900
Distributions for the year ended
December 31, 1996 (213,400) (3,921,000) (4,134,400)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partners' (deficit) capital,
December 31, 1996 $(183,300) $23,147,600 $22,964,300
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
A-3
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD.--3
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND EXPENSES
For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
(All dollars rounded to nearest 00s except per Unit amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income:
Rental $ 3,074,700 $ 3,075,900 $ 3,386,800
Interest 446,700 595,900 374,800
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,521,400 3,671,800 3,761,600
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses:
Depreciation and amortization 723,200 827,600 933,100
Property operating:
Affiliates 178,800 182,300 164,500
Nonaffiliates 639,200 582,500 653,500
Real estate taxes 334,100 332,800 321,800
Insurance-Affiliate 36,500 24,900 29,000
Repairs and maintenance 448,900 410,000 459,000
General and administrative:
Affiliates 36,200 44,100 37,900
Nonaffiliates 148,900 152,200 163,200
Loss on sale of property 48,900
Provisions for value impairment 1,600,000 1,500,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,545,800 4,156,400 4,310,900
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) before net income
(loss) from participation in joint
venture 975,600 (484,600) (549,300)
Net income (loss) from participation
in joint venture 383,300 (121,000) (469,800)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $ 1,358,900 $ (605,600) $(1,019,100)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income allocated to General
Partner $ 213,400 $ 249,300 $ 140,400
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) allocated to Limited
Partners $ 1,145,500 $ (854,900) $(1,159,500)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) allocated to Limited
Partners per Unit (45,737 Units
outstanding) $ 25.05 $ (18.69) $ (25.35)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
(All dollars rounded to nearest 00s)
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 1,358,900 $ (605,600) $(1,019,100)
Adjustments to reconcile net income
(loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 723,200 827,600 933,100
Provisions for value impairment 1,600,000 1,500,000
Net (income) loss from participation
in joint venture (383,300) 121,000 469,800
Loss on sale of property 48,900
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in rents
receivable (16,100) (4,800) 27,900
(Increase) decrease in other assets (12,700) 100 41,300
(Decrease) increase in accounts
payable and accrued expenses (77,000) 109,300 (113,000)
(Decrease) increase in due to
Affiliates (21,300) (11,500) 41,100
Increase (decrease) in other
liabilities 43,100 900 (48,300)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating
activities 1,614,800 2,037,000 1,881,700
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from the sale of property 2,168,200
Payments for capital and tenant
improvements (321,400) (354,900) (670,600)
(Funding of) collection of loans to
joint venture (111,300) (59,500) 64,800
Distributions received from joint
venture 66,400 493,400 317,800
(Increase) in restricted cash (37,500)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used for) provided by
investing activities (403,800) 79,000 1,880,200
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions paid to Partners (4,490,200) (2,540,900) (1,134,300)
Increase (decrease) in security
deposits 6,200 4,200 (15,800)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used for) financing
activities (4,484,000) (2,536,700) (1,150,100)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents (3,273,000) (420,700) 2,611,800
Cash and cash equivalents at the
beginning of the year 8,022,200 8,442,900 5,831,100
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at the end
of the year $ 4,749,200 $ 8,022,200 $ 8,442,900
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
A-4
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD.-3
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1996
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
DEFINITION OF SPECIAL TERMS:
Capitalized terms used in this report have the same meaning as those terms in
the Partnership's Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on Form S-11. Definitions of these terms are contained in Article
III of the First Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited
Partnership, which is incorporated herein by reference.
ORGANIZATION:
The Partnership was formed on November 6, 1984, by the filing of a Certificate
and Agreement of Limited Partnership with the Department of State of the State
of Florida, and commenced the Offering of Units on January 17, 1985. The
Certificate and Agreement, as amended and restated, authorized the sale to the
public of up to 50,000 Units with the General Partner's option to increase the
Offering by an additional 50,000 Units and not less than 1,400 Units. On March
4, 1985, the required minimum subscription level was reached and Partnership
operations commenced. A total of 45,737 Units were sold prior to Termination of
the Offering in May, 1986. The Partnership was formed to invest primarily in
existing, income-producing commercial real estate.
The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership will be dissolved on or
before December 31, 2014. The Limited Partners, by a majority vote, may
dissolve the Partnership at any time.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Under this method of accounting,
revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred.
Preparation of the Partnership's financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The financial statements include the Partnership's 50% interest in two joint
ventures and 25% interest in another joint venture all with Affiliated
partnerships. These joint ventures were formed for the purpose of each
acquiring a 100% interest in certain real property and are operated under the
common control of the General Partner. Accordingly, the Partnership's pro rata
share of the ventures' revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities and Partners'
(deficit) capital is included in the financial statements.
Investment in joint venture represents the recording of the Partnership's
interest, under the equity method of accounting, in a joint venture, Lansing
Associates ("Lansing"), with an Affiliated partnership. Lansing acquired a
preferred majority interest in a joint venture with the seller of the Lansing,
Michigan property. Under the equity method of accounting, the Partnership
recorded its initial interest at cost and adjusts its investment account for
its share of joint venture income or loss and its distributions of cash flow
(as defined in the joint venture agreement). For further information, see Note
3.
The Partnership is not liable for federal income taxes as the Partners
recognize their proportionate share of the Partnership's income or loss on
their income tax returns; therefore, no provision for income taxes is made in
the financial statements of the Partnership. It is not practicable for the
Partnership to determine the aggregate tax bases of the Limited Partners;
therefore, the disclosure of the difference between the tax bases and the
reported assets and liabilities of the Partnership would not be meaningful.
Commercial rental properties are recorded at cost, net of any provisions for
value impairment, and depreciated (exclusive of amounts allocated to land) on
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Lease acquisition
fees are recorded at cost and amortized on the straight-line method over the
life of each respective lease. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed
against operations as incurred; expenditures for improvements are capitalized
to the appropriate property accounts and depreciated on the straight-line
method over the estimated life of such improvements.
During the first quarter of 1996, the Partnership adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" (the "Standard"). The
Standard established guidance for determining if the value of defined assets is
impaired, and if so, how impairment losses should be measured and reported in
the financial statements. Management is not aware of any indicator that would
result in any significant impairment loss. The standard also addressed the
accounting for long-lived assets to be disposed of. Evaluation of the potential
impairment of the value of the Partnership's assets is performed on an
individual property basis.
Property sales or dispositions are recorded when title transfers and sufficient
consideration has been received by the Partnership. Upon disposition, the
related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective
accounts. Any gain or loss on sale or disposition is recognized in accordance
with GAAP.
Cash equivalents are considered all highly liquid investments with maturity of
three months or less when purchased.
The Partnership's financial statements include financial instruments, including
receivables, trade liabilities and investment in joint venture. The Partnership
considers the disclosure of the fair value of its investment in joint venture
to be impracticable due to the illiquid nature of its investment. The fair
value of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, was not
materially different from their carrying value at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
2. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, subsequent to May 16, 1986, the
Termination of the Offering, the General Partner is entitled to 10% of
distributable Cash Flow (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) as a
Partnership Management
A-5
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD.-3
Fee. In addition, Net Profits (exclusive of Net Profits from the sale or
disposition of Partnership properties) are allocated to the General Partner in
an amount equal to the greater of 1% of such Net Profits or the Partnership
Management Fee paid by the Partnership to the General Partner and, the balance,
if any, to the Limited Partners. Net Losses (exclusive of Net Losses from the
sale, disposition or provision for value impairment of Partnership properties)
are allocated 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners. Net
Profits from the sale or disposition of a Partnership property are allocated:
first, prior to giving effect to any distributions of Sale Proceeds from the
transaction, to all Partners with negative balances in their Capital Accounts,
pro rata in proportion to such respective negative balances, to the extent of
the total of such negative balances; second, to the General Partner, in an
amount necessary to make the positive balance in its Capital Account equal to
the amount of Sale Proceeds to be distributed to the General Partner with
respect to the sale or disposition of such property; and third, the balance, if
any, to the Limited Partners. Net Losses from the sale, disposition or
provision for value impairment of Partnership properties are allocated: first,
after giving effect to any distributions of Sale Proceeds from the transaction
to all Partners with positive balances in their Capital Accounts, pro rata in
proportion to such respective positive balances, to the extent of the total
amount of such positive balances; and second, the balance, if any, 1% to the
General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary, there shall be allocated to the General Partner not less than 1%
of all items of Partnership income, gain, loss, deduction and credit during the
existence of the Partnership. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the General
Partner was entitled to a Partnership Management Fee, and accordingly,
allocated Net Profits, of $213,400. For the year ended December 31, 1995, the
General Partner was entitled to a Partnership Management Fee of $269,300 and
allocated Net Profits of $249,300, which included a (loss) from provisions for
value impairment of $(20,000). For the year ended December 31, 1994, the
General Partner was entitled to a Partnership Management Fee of $155,900 and
allocated Net Profits of $140,400, which included (losses) from provisions for
value impairment of $(15,000) and the sale of Partnership property of $(500).
Fees and reimbursements paid and payable by the Partnership to Affiliates
during the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
Paid Payable Paid Payable Paid Payable
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Property management and
leasing fees $191,600 $31,400 $191,500 $48,400 $115,700 $ 62,600
Real estate commissions
(a) None 40,200 None 40,200 None 40,200
Reimbursement of property
insurance premiums, at
cost 36,500 None 24,900 None 28,000 None
Reimbursement of
expenses, at cost:
--Accounting 27,200 2,000 19,500 5,300 20,300 2,300
--Investor communication 11,800 400 21,900 2,000 14,900 2,300
--Legal 5,600 600 8,100 None 15,700 None
--Other 200 None 1,000 None None None
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$272,900 $74,600 $266,900 $95,900 $194,600 $107,400
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
(a) As of December 31, 1996, $40,200 was due to the General Partner for real
estate commissions earned in connection with the sales of Partnership
properties. These commissions have been accrued but not paid. In accordance
with the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership will not pay the General
Partner or any Affiliate a real estate commission from the sale of a
Partnership property until Limited Partners have received cumulative
distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds equal to 100% of their
Original Capital Contribution, plus a cumulative return (including all Cash
Flow, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, which has been distributed
to the Limited Partners from the initial investment date) of 6% simple
interest per annum on their Capital Investment.
On-site property management for the Partnership's properties is provided by an
Affiliate of the General Partner for fees ranging from 3% to 6% of gross rents
received from the properties.
3. INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE:
A summary of the financial information for First Capital Lansing Properties
Limited Partnership, which owns the Holiday Office Park North and South
("Holiday"), as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
ASSETS
Investment property, net of
accumulated depreciation and
amortization $10,690,300
Cash and cash equivalents 837,800
Loans receivable 458,700
Rents receivable 26,900
Other assets 165,100
---------------------------------------------
$12,178,800
---------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
Loan payable to Affiliate $ 1,634,500
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 609,400
Due to Affiliates 33,800
Security deposits 24,500
Other liabilities 2,500
Partners' capital 9,874,100
---------------------------------------------
$12,178,800
---------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
A-6
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD.-3
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSES
Total revenues $3,236,600
---------------------------------------
Expenses:
Property operating 1,928,900
Depreciation and amortization 382,900
Interest to Affiliates 158,200
---------------------------------------
Total expenses 2,470,000
---------------------------------------
Net income $ 766,600
---------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The information presented above represents 100% of the activity of Holiday. The
Partnership owns a 50% interest in Lansing, which owns a 75% preferred interest
in Holiday.
4. FUTURE MINIMUM RENTALS:
The Partnership's share of future minimum rental income due on noncancelable
leases as of December 31, 1996 was as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997 $ 3,527,300
1998 3,132,200
1999 2,487,600
2000 1,981,900
2001 681,900
Thereafter 543,800
--------------
$12,354,700
--------------
</TABLE>
5. RESTRICTED CASH:
Restricted cash includes Eurodollar investments which have been pledged as
collateral for security deposits to the Houston Lighting & Power Company and
the Florida Lighting and Power Company.
6. INCOME TAX:
The Partnership utilizes the accrual basis of accounting for both tax reporting
and financial statement purposes. Financial statement results will differ from
tax results due to the use of differing depreciation lives and methods, the
recognition of rents received in advance as taxable income, the use of
differing methods in computing the gain on sale of property and the
Partnership's provisions for value impairment. The net effect of these
accounting differences for the year ended December 31, 1996 was that the net
income for tax reporting purposes was greater than the net income for financial
statement purposes by $139,900. The aggregate cost of commercial rental
property for income tax purposes at December 31, 1996 was $23,296,200.
7. PROPERTY SALE:
On June 8, 1994, Farmington Hills Associates ("FHA"), the joint venture which
owned North Valley Office Center ("North Valley") and Wellington North Office
Complex ("Wellington A, B and C"), in which the Partnership owned a 50%
interest, sold Wellington C for the sale price of $4,500,000. The Partnership's
share of selling expenses was $81,800. The Partnership's share of the net
proceeds from this sale was $2,168,200. The Partnership recorded a total loss
on the sale of this property of $2,048,900 for financial statement purposes, of
which $2,000,000 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 1992 as a
provision for value impairment.
The above transaction was an all-cash sale, with no further involvement on the
part of the Partnership.
8. PROVISIONS FOR VALUE IMPAIRMENT:
Due to regional factors and other matters affecting the Partnership's
properties, there was uncertainty as to the Partnership's ability to recover
the net carrying basis of certain of its properties during the remaining
estimated holding periods. Accordingly, it was deemed appropriate to reduce the
bases of certain properties in the Partnership's financial statements during
the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994. The provisions for value impairment
were considered non-cash events for the purposes of the Statements of Cash Flow
and were not utilized in the determination of Cash Flow (as defined in the
Partnership Agreement). The following is a summary of the provisions for value
impairment reported by the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Property 1995 1994
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Ellis Building $ 500,000 $1,000,000
Park Plaza Professional
Building 900,000 500,000
3120 Southwest Freeway 200,000
--------------------------------------------
$1,600,000 $1,500,000
--------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The joint venture which owns Holiday recorded a provision for value impairment
in the amount of $800,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. This provision
was allocated to the general partners of the joint venture. Accordingly, the
Partnership's share of this provision was $400,000 and reflected in the net
loss from participation in joint venture. For the year ended December 31, 1994,
a provision for value impairment for Holiday was recorded in the amount of
$2,000,000. Of this amount,
A-7
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD.-3
$655,200 was allocated to the limited partners of the joint venture which
reduced their capital account to zero and the remaining amount was allocated to
the general partners, of which the Partnership's share was $672,400.
9. SUBSEQUENT EVENT:
On February 18, 1997, the joint venture in which the Partnership has a 25%
interest consummated the sale of 3120 Southwest Freeway Office Building,
located in Houston, Texas. The sale price was $3,425,000, of which the
Partnership's share is $856,300. Net sales proceeds from this transaction
approximated $822,800, which was net of closing expenses. The Partnership will
report a net gain of approximately $245,000 for financial reporting purposes
during 1997 in connection with this sale. The Partnership will distribute
$822,800, or $17.99 per Unit, on May 31, 1997 to Limited Partners of record as
of February 18, 1997.
A-8
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD. - 3
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Column A Column C Column D Column E
- ------------- ------------------------ ------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Initial cost Costs capitalized Gross amount carried
to Partnership subsequent to acquisition at close of period
---------- ------------ ------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Buildings Buildings
and Improve- and
Description Land Improvements ments Costs (1) Land Improvements Total (2)(3)
- ------------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Office Buildings:
Park Plaza
Professional
Building
(Houston, TX) $802,900 $10,750,400 $2,271,500 $82,400 $802,900 $11,704,300 $12,507,200(4)
(50% interest)
Ellis Building
(Sarasota, FL) 860,000 5,405,600 1,441,500 25,900 860,000 5,373,000 6,233,000(7)
(50% interest)
3120 Southwest
Freeway
(Houston, TX) 245,700 440,600 461,500 10,200 245,700 712,300 958,000(8)
(25% interest)
---------- ----------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----------- -----------
$1,908,600 $16,596,600 $4,174,500 $118,500 $1,908,600 $17,789,600 $19,698,200
========== =========== ========== ======== ========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Column A Column F Column G Column H Column I
- ------------ ------------ --------- -------- ------------
Life on
which
depreciation
in latest
Accumulated Date income
Depreciation of con- Date statement
Description (2) struction Acquired is computed
- ------------ ------------ --------- -------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Office Buildings:
- ----------------
Park Plaza
Professional
Building 35(5)
(Houston, TX) $3,990,400 1976 11/86 3-10(6)
(50% interest)
Ellis Building 35(5)
(Sarasota, FL) 2,202,600 1969 3/86 3-10(6)
(50% interest)
3120 Southwest
Freeway 35(5)
(Houston, TX) 381,900 1972 3/89 3-10(6)
(25% interest)
----------
$6,574,900
==========
</TABLE>
Column B - Not Applicable.
See accompanying notes on the following page.
A-9
<PAGE>
FIRST CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL REAL ESTATE, LTD. - 3
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III
Note 1. Consists of legal fees, appraisal fees, title costs and other related
professional fees.
Note 2. The following is a reconciliation of activity in columns E and F:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995 December 31, 1994
--------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------------
Accumulated Accumulated Accumulate
Cost Depreciation Cost Depreciation Cost Depreciation
----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at
beginning of year $19,376,800 $5,851,700 $20,621,900 $5,024,100 $24,026,100 $4,448,800
Additions during
year:
Improvements 321,400 354,900 670,600
Provisions for
depreciation 723,200 827,600 933,000
Deductions
during year:
Basis of real
estate disposed (2,574,800)
Accumulated
depreciation of real
estate disposed (357,700)
Provisions for
value impairment (1,600,000) (1,500,000)
---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Balance at end
of year $19,698,200 $6,574,900 $19,376,800 $5,851,700 $20,621,900 $5,024,100
========== ========= ========== ========= ========== =========
</TABLE>
Note 3. The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purposes at December 31,
1996 is $23,296,200.
Note 4. Includes provisions for value impairment of $1,400,000.
Note 5. Estimated useful life of building.
Note 6. Estimated useful life of improvements.
Note 7. Includes provisions for value impairment of $1,500,000.
Note 8. Includes a provision for value impairment of $200,000. This property
was sold on February 18, 1997. See Note 9 of Notes to Financial
Statements for additional information.
A-10
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000757528
<NAME> First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd - 3
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 4,749,200
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 45,700
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 4,894,900
<PP&E> 19,698,200
<DEPRECIATION> 6,574,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 23,896,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 844,300
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 22,964,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 23,896,300
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 3,521,400
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 1,637,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 185,100
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,358,900
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 1,358,900
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 1,358,900
<EPS-PRIMARY> 25.05
<EPS-DILUTED> 25.05
</TABLE>
