<PAGE> 1
[GEMINI II LOGO]
ANNUAL REPORT 1995
<PAGE> 2
In this Annual Report, I am delighted to formally introduce you to John J.
Brennan, who, on January 31, 1996, will assume my responsibilities as Chief
Executive Officer of Gemini II and the other Funds in The Vanguard Group. Mr.
Brennan will continue to serve as President of the Funds, and I will continue
to serve as Chairman of the Board.
As a shareholder of the Fund since its inception and as Chairman of
all the Vanguard Funds, I want to tell you that I am enthusiastic and confident
that Jack Brennan is exactly the right person to succeed me as Chief Executive
Officer. To use yet another Vanguard nautical metaphor, he will be the new
captain. He has the qualities of leadership, integrity, intelligence, and
vision that must continue to be Vanguard's hallmark as we move toward, and then
into, the 21st century.
I know that he has these qualities, because Jack Brennan and I have
been working closely together since he joined Vanguard in 1982. He is a
graduate of Dartmouth College and Harvard Business School. He started as
Assistant to the Chairman and, rising like a rocket, became President in 1989.
While, at age 41, he may seem young, he is in fact older than I was when I
became Chief Executive Officer of Vanguard's predecessor organization in 1967,
at the age of 38. Most important of all, Jack is completely dedicated to the
Vanguard character, and believes in our basic mission: serving solely the
shareholder, free of any conflict of interest. He believes in holding our costs
of operation to a minimum, and in retaining our position as the lowest-cost
provider of financial services in the world. He is a true competitor, who
shares Vanguard's dedication to providing highly competitive returns to our
investors relative to the returns provided by other mutual funds with
comparable objectives. He also believes in reporting our results to
shareholders with complete candor. He has the full support of the Board of
Directors and our crew, and is committed to staying the course we have set for
Vanguard. You need have no doubt that the essential elements that drew you to
Vanguard in the first place will remain intact.
[FIGURE 1]
As for me, I expect to fill a useful, if less demanding, role as
Chairman of the Board. I shall keep a watchful eye over the interests of our
shareholders, our crew, and our investment policies. I shall also speak out on
industry affairs, reminding all who will listen of the primacy of the interests
of mutual fund shareholders. I will be readily available to provide Jack
Brennan with whatever wisdom I may have acquired during my lifetime of
experience in this wonderful industry and in my service as captain of Vanguard
since I founded this unique organization more than two decades ago.
In short, I'll still be around. Thank you for all your confidence in
me in the past and, in advance, for your continued confidence in Vanguard under
Jack Brennan's leadership.
/s/ JOHN C. BOGLE
GEMINI II SEEKS TO PROVIDE LONG-TERM CAPITAL GROWTH FOR ITS CAPITAL
SHAREHOLDERS, AND CURRENT INCOME AND INCOME GROWTH FOR ITS INCOME SHAREHOLDERS.
THE FUND INVESTS PRINCIPALLY IN COMMON STOCKS, SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF
FUNDAMENTAL VALUE, THAT ARE EXPECTED TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE FUND'S DUAL
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES. THE FUND'S HOLDINGS ARE USUALLY CHARACTERIZED BY
RELATIVELY LOW PRICE-EARNINGS RATIOS AND ABOVE-AVERAGE INCOME YIELDS.
<PAGE> 3
CHAIRMAN'S LETTER
Fellow Shareholder:
During the year ending December 31, 1995, Gemini II completed the best year in
its history. In a high-flying stock market, not only was our total return of
+38.2% spectacular in an absolute sense, but it also exceeded the return of the
market-leading Standard & Poor's 500 Index, something that only about 15% of
all general equity funds succeeded in doing.
Our total return (capital change plus reinvested dividends) topped, by
a narrow margin, the return of the unmanaged Standard & Poor's 500 Composite
Stock Price Index, which is dominated by the large capitalization blue-chip
stocks that led the market during 1995. The Fund also outpaced, by a huge
margin, the average return provided by our peer group of mutual funds seeking
to provide, as does Gemini II, both growth and income. Indeed, we enjoyed one
of our strongest years ever, relative to this competitive standard. This table
compares the 1995 returns of both of these benchmark standards with the return
of the Fund as a whole:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL RETURN
--------------------
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
GEMINI II +38.2%
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE VALUE MUTUAL FUND +31.4%
STANDARD & POOR'S 500 STOCK INDEX +37.6
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The Fund's total return takes into account the increase in our net asset value,
distributions from net investment income and realized short-term capital gains,
and Federal taxes accrued on net long-term capital gains.
CAPITAL SHARE RESULTS
The net asset value of each Capital Share rose from $19.03 on December 31,
1994, to $26.35 on December 31, 1995, net of our accrual of $1.37 per share for
Federal taxes on long-term capital gains realized during the year and a
distribution of $0.11 from short-term gains. The return on our Capital Shares,
then, was a remarkable +46.2% for the year. By way of contrast, the value of
the Standard & Poor's 500 Index rose by +34.1% (excluding dividends). This wide
disparity in our favor is a direct result of the Fund's capital leverage of 1.4
times. Other factors held equal, the Capital Shares should rise (or fall) about
1.4 times the percentage increase (or decrease) in the net asset value of
Gemini II's total portfolio.
You may recall that in our initial public offering--on February 15,
1985--the leverage was 2.0 times. (That is because the Capital Shares and the
Income Shares each provided one-half of the Fund's total initial assets.) The
reason for the decline in our leverage ratio is directly related to the
substantial growth in the value of our assets, which redounds entirely to the
Capital Shares.
INCOME SHARE RESULTS
Gemini II's Income Shares received dividends totaling $1.80 per share for 1995,
compared with $1.73 per share in 1994. This year's income distribution
comprised our four regular quarterly dividends at the rate of $0.35 per share
(our quarterly rate was increased from $0.25 per share to $0.35 in the second
quarter of 1994), and an "extra" dividend of $0.40 per share distributed at the
close of 1995. This year-end dividend is simply the amount by which our net
investment income for 1995 exceeded the four quarterly dividend payments.
We are particularly pleased with this +4.0% increase in annual net
investment income, since it was earned despite the ongoing "drag" of Federal
taxes. As you know, these taxes are charged directly against the Fund's assets,
giving the Income Shares a commensurately lower asset base on which to earn
income.
For 1995, our total portfolio provided an annual yield of 5.0%, more
than double the 2.2% year-end yield on the Standard & Poor's 500 Index. Based
on their net asset value of $9.33 at year end, our Income Shares--benefiting
from "income leverage"--provided a yield of 19.3%. Based on their market price
of $10.125 per share, the yield was 17.8%. This yield, however, must be
considered in light of the premium paid for the Income Shares.
(continued)
1
<PAGE> 4
[FIGURE 2]
This premium, of course, will gradually diminish as Gemini II approaches its
"maturity" on January 31, 1997. (I'll discuss the Fund's maturity in more depth
later in this Annual Report.)
THE STOCK MARKET IN 1995
The great bull market in stocks we enjoyed during the year was virtually
uninterrupted. The dimension of the increase was close to record breaking,
delighting the bulls even as it astonished the bears. The stock market rose in
eleven of the past twelve months and, after all was said and done, the Standard
& Poor's 500 Index had generated a total return of +37.6% for the year--its
best year since 1958.
There were, as always, many opinions as to the source of the surprising
strength in the stock market. In my view, it resulted from a combination of:
(1) record-breaking corporate profits; (2) a growing speculative fever in the
marketplace, particularly during the final weeks of the year; and (3) a sharp
decline in long-term interest rates. The rise in corporate profits was
particularly striking. It's estimated that operating earnings for the companies
in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index increased about +15% in 1995, after already
rising +16% in 1994. (Since 1926, earnings growth has averaged less than +7%
per year.) If there is a cautionary signal in this boom in profits, it is that
the two-year cumulative earnings growth of +33% has been accompanied by
dividend growth of only +11%.
This subdued dividend growth in the face of sharply higher stock prices
resulted in a decline in the yield on the Index to 2.2%, the lowest level on
record. Nonetheless, the Wall Street chorus sings "this time it's different."
Dividend yield and earnings growth--the two fundamentals of stock returns--are
clearly taking a back seat to the market's high valuation of these long-term
fundamentals. This is called "speculation," and it is hardly an inconsequential
component of 1995's high returns on stocks. So, as 1996 begins, we face an
environment that is surely sobering.
The huge decline in interest rates during the year not only provided a
major stimulus to the stock market, but also set bond prices afire. The yield
of the Lehman Long-Term Corporate Bond Index declined from 8.9% to 6.9% during
our 1995 fiscal year, even below its level of 7.1% at the start of 1994. The
1995 decline drove long-term bond prices up by fully +19%, resulting in a total
return (including the interest coupon) of +28%--remarkably competitive with the
return on stocks. Short-term rates also declined as the Federal Reserve reduced
the Federal funds rate (the rate at which banks borrow from one another) in
July and again in December. On balance during the year, the yield on the U.S.
Treasury bill eased from 5.6% to 5.0%.
This improvement in the actual (and expected) interest rate environment
was caused largely by a measurable softening in the growth of the U.S. economy,
perhaps with further weakness to come. A sluggish economy, in turn, engendered
continued optimism about the benign outlook for inflation. (Indeed, the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) was quite well-behaved in 1995, rising by but +2.6%,
its smallest increase since 1986.) Investors should carefully ponder the extent
to which today's high growth rate of corporate earnings can be sustained in a
slowing economy.
2
<PAGE> 5
THE 1990s SO FAR
During the past year, growth stocks (return of +38.1%) and value stocks
(+37.0%) were relatively equal participants in the great bull market. In fact,
so far during the 1990s, as shown in the chart to the left, there was little
overall difference between the two investment styles, despite some considerable
year-to-year variations.
You will note that, during the six-year period, the average annual
rates of return of the two groups of stocks were virtually identical: +13.3%
for the Standard & Poor's Growth Index and +12.6% for the Standard & Poor's
Value Index. (Each Index represents about 50% of the total market
capitalization of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.) Since this long-term
congruence conceals significant annual variations, we have also shown the
year-by-year total returns of the two Indexes.
GEMINI II IN 1995
Our strong total return in an ebullient year for the stock market--and an
especially good year for the giant blue-chip equities that dominate the
Standard & Poor's 500 Index--was shaped by five major factors, four positive
and one negative:
- - The first major positive was our excellent selection of market sectors. Fully
61% of our common stock position was invested in the financial group
versus 12% for the Standard & Poor's 500 Index. This group was one of the
year's big winners, with a total return of +53.4%. (We held virtually nothing
in the year's most-discussed g roup--technology--which, after soaring for
nine months, plummeted in the fourth quarter. On balance, the group ended up
with a market-neutral, if generous, return of +37.5%.)
- - The second positive factor was our very good selections of individual stocks.
Good choices added smartly to the returns from our large financial
group commitment, as well as in the basic materials and consumer cyclical
groups.
- - The third positive was the fine performance of our large position (33% of
assets) in convertible preferred securities, with individual selections
that actually outpaced the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.
- - The fourth positive was our highly concentrated portfolio (45% of assets in
our ten largest equity holdings) in top-performing stocks.
- - The sole significant negative factor was our "cash drag" during the second
half of the year. Our defensive position in temporary cash reserves
averaged about 13% of assets. (In recent years, it had been held to about
2%.) Cash reserves, of course, did not participate in the year's continual
bull market.
I would add that it is no mean achievement to earn a total return of +38.2%
(versus +37.6% for the Index) in a year in which the portfolio's common stock
component averaged but 50% of assets, slightly--but only slightly--less than in
prior years. This table compares our portfolio's composition at year-end 1995
to one year ago:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS
------------------------------
DECEMBER 31,
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
1994 1995
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
EQUITY EQUIVALENTS
COMMON STOCKS 62% 48%
CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES 36 36
LOWER-GRADE BONDS 5 3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL 103% 87%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESERVE EQUIVALENTS
U.S. TREASURY NOTES 0% 0%
OTHER TEMPORARY INVESTMENTS 0 0
NET CASH -3 13
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL -3% 13%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 100% 100%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
All in all, the past year was a fine wrap-up to John B. Neff's tenure as
portfolio manager--the only person to serve in this capacity since we began
operations on February 15, 1985. We announced Mr. Neff's coming retirement to
you one year ago in our 1994 Annual Report. He was succeeded by Charles T.
Freeman on December 31, 1995.
(continued)
3
<PAGE> 6
Mr. Freeman has worked directly with Mr. Neff over the past 26 years,
and your Officers and Directors are confident that he and his experienced
Gemini II team will give a good account of themselves. We recognize that Chuck,
as they say, "has big shoes to fill," but we believe that his experience and
investment skill will not let you down. So, as we say "congratulations" to John
for his fine work, we also say "welcome aboard" to Chuck, who will oversee the
Fund until its maturity on January 31, 1997, only about one year hence.
OUR LIFETIME RECORD
Gemini II will mature in one year's time, just as planned in its original
operating structure. During this period, shareholders can expect the Fund and
incoming manager Chuck Freeman to essentially follow the same investment
objectives and style as during the past eleven years: emphasis on stocks
believed to represent sound fundamental value; focus on "contrarian" stocks
often eschewed by other portfolio managers; building large positions in a
limited number of stocks; and heavy reliance on equity-linked (convertible)
bonds.
How effectively have these strategies worked during Gemini II's
lifetime? The answer is "very effectively indeed." This table compares the
Fund's total return with that of the average value mutual fund and the Standard
& Poor's 500 Index:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL RETURN
----------------------------------
FEBRUARY 15, 1985, TO
DECEMBER 31, 1995
----------------------------------
CUMULATIVE ANNUAL RATE
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
GEMINI II +369% +15.3%
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE VALUE FUND +288% +13.3%
STANDARD & POOR'S 500 INDEX +383 +15.6
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Note: Gemini II's returns assume the reinvestment of income dividends and
distributions from capital gains at the net asset values prevailing on their
reinvestment dates; Federal taxes payable are assumed to have been reinvested
at their year-end net asset values.
It should go without saying that the returns reflected in the table are merely
history. The return of the Fund during its remaining year of independent
existence--both on an absolute basis and relative to the average value fund and
to the Index--are unpredictable, and may be better or worse than those
illustrated above.
Our superiority over the average value fund is impressive by any
standard. Note especially what a large difference in cumulative return (fully
+81 percentage points) is created by our seemingly modest advantage of two
percentage points in annual return. Such is the magic created by the force of
compounding combined with the superior portfolio management of our investment
adviser.
The table also reflects our minuscule shortfall (-0.3% per year) to
the Standard & Poor's 500 Index. This Index, as you know, is a tough competitor
for actively managed mutual funds. It always has been! The Index is calculated
"on paper," without the "real world" expenses of fund operations, advisory
fees, portfolio transaction costs, and the impact of cash reserves. Mutual
funds, on the other hand, must incur such costs, and it has proved difficult
for most professional money managers to provide more than compensatory returns.
Indeed, during the past decade, only eleven of the 124 value mutual funds in
operation throughout the period have outpaced the Index.
PREMIUMS AND DISCOUNTS
When Gemini II "matures" on January 31, 1997, the Capital Shares and the Income
Shares will be valued at their actual net asset values on that date, without
the premiums that have been typical of the Income Shares and the discounts that
have been typical of the Capital Shares. The following table shows the
difference between the current net asset value and the market price at which
each class was trading on the New York Stock Exchange at year end:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 1995
--------------------------------------------
NET ASSET MARKET
VALUE PRICE DIFFERENCE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CAPITAL SHARES $26.35 $25.750 -2.3%
INCOME SHARES 9.33 10.125 +8.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $35.68 $35.875 +0.5%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE> 7
The charts below show how Gemini II's premiums and discounts have varied during
its lifetime. Note how the premiums on the Income Shares have been reduced as
the maturity date approaches; the same trend is evident in the reduced
discounts on the Capital Shares. Note also how closely the combined market
value of the two classes of shares has closely tracked the Fund's combined net
asset value (i.e., a very modest premium or discount), a phenomenon that would
(and should) characterize efficient capital markets.
IN SUMMARY
When I wrote to you in our 1994 Annual Report, after a tough and bumpy ride in
a lackluster year, I warned you that "the stock market is surely due for its
share
[FIGURE 3]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Income Earned $ 1.13* $1.23 $1.38 $1.41 $1.58 $1.63 $1.65 $1.66 $1.66 $1.74 $1.79
Year-End Net Asset Value 9.83 9.73 9.39 9.38 9.37 9.34 9.34 9.33 9.33 9.34 9.33
Year-End Market Price 11 5/8 13 5/8 11 7/8 12 1/2 13 11 1/4 13 3/8 12 11 3/4 10 1/2 10 1/8
Premium 18.3% 40.0% 26.5% 33.3% 38.7% 20.4% 43.2% 28.6% 25.9% 12.4% 8.5%
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2/85 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Adjusted
Net Asset Value** $10.00 $11.53 $14.67 $14.89 $18.98 $20.38 $14.65 $20.17 $23.05 $27.38 $24.92 $33.72
Actual Net Asset Value 10.00 11.47 13.87 12.98 16.56 17.44 11.51 16.28 18.71 22.10 19.03 26.35
Year-End Market Price -- 11 12 1/8 10 5/8 12 7/8 15 5/8 9 1/2 13 1/4 14 7/8 19 7/8 17 5/8 25 3/4
Discount -- 4.1% 12.6% 18.1% 22.3% 10.4% 17.5% 18.6% 20.5% 10.1% 7.4% 2.3%
Combined
Premium/Discount -- +6.2% +9.1% +0.6% -2.2% +6.8% -0.5% +3.9% -4.2% +0.6% -0.9% +0.5%
</TABLE>
* Represents net investment income earned from February 15, 1985.
** Net asset value plus cumulative short-term capital gains and capital
gains taxes paid by the Fund.
5
<PAGE> 8
of difficult bumps along the way during the next few years." As 1995 was to
turn out, I hardly could have been more wide of the mark. Whether 1996 or even
1997 will confirm my caution remains to be seen.
What should Gemini II investors do in this environment? Because of our
capital leverage, the Capital Shares of Gemini II are sure to be more volatile
than the overall stock market. Because of our income leverage, our Income
Shares should continue to provide higher yields than stocks in general. Your
holdings in either class (or both) should be considered in the light of the
exposure of your total investment portfolio to equities, bonds, and short-term
reserves.
Whatever course you choose, we recommend that you focus not on the
fluctuations in the values of both classes of shares that are certain to
punctuate our final year of operations--or even on the potential variability
that would be suggested by our past returns--but on the Fund's long-term
record, investment objectives, and policies. Timing the market is an inevitably
fallible endeavor; therefore, we believe that, provided your overall account is
soundly balanced, "stay the course" is virtually always the best advice. In the
year remaining in Gemini II's lifetime, we pledge to do the same.
Sincerely,
/s/ JOHN C. BOGLE
- --------------------------
John C. Bogle
Chairman of the Board
January 22, 1996
Note: Mutual fund data from Lipper Analytical Services, Inc.
6
<PAGE> 9
REPORT FROM THE INVESTMENT ADVISER
1995 will undoubtedly go down in stock market history as an extraordinary year,
witness the fact that it was the largest advance in 37 years. Despite this, we
managed to weigh in with a good result by moderately outperforming the S&P 500.
This was noteworthy because the yardstick was up a brilliant +37.6%, a total
return truly rare for its high magnitude advance. It usually is difficult for
us to keep up in a frothy, soaring, speculative market such as 1995. Not only
does our "four yards and a cloud of dust" fare usually get left behind, but
additionally the yield ilk that Gemini II features is usually not a full
participant in an adrenaline type of market.
Particularly positive contributors were financial intermediaries in
such very large holdings as CIGNA, Aetna, H.F. Ahmanson, Great Western
Financial, and Chemical Bank, all up on average about 60%.
In addition, convertibles, which account for about 35% of Gemini II's
assets, were a considerable performance contributor (in contrast to 1994), most
notably, Delta Airlines, Conner Peripherals, and the home builders. Also,
convertible holdings eliminated during the year, such as Citicorp, Seagate
Technology, and Kaiser Aluminum, were winners as well.
As mentioned in the Semi-Annual Report, we have continued to build
Gemini's representation in the undervalued (in our view) basic commodity
cyclicals (aluminums, chemicals, papers, and steels), which did not fully
participate in the 1995 stock market surge. We think the economy will continue
its moderate growth for two or three more years, thus allowing these industry
participants to continue to register excellent earnings. These are presently
valued at an extremely low relationship to earnings versus the rest of the
market and accordingly now account for about one-third of Gemini II's assets.
Despite the dilution of 2.1% from the payment of capital gains tax at
the beginning of the year, we were able to snare a 4% increase in the dividend
to $1.80 in 1995. In 1996, which will be the last year for Gemini II
shareholders, we are striving to garner at least a comparable percentage
increase.
For almost eleven years, I have had the pleasure of serving and
representing Gemini II shareholders and, while not every year was studded with
accomplishment, overall we have done pretty well. During this same period, I
have had the additional satisfaction of building Gemini II's portfolio team to
carry on the important responsibility of "staying the course" in continuing the
Gemini II record of accomplishment. Chuck Freeman and I have been together for
over twenty-six years in forging your Fund's record in the crucible of the
marketplace. He has been an intimate and vital part of the Gemini II record and
is eminently well-prepared as portfolio manager to carry on Gemini II's
never-ending quest for superior performance.
Chuck will be ably assisted by Jim Averill and Jim Mordy, who have
been brought up over the last ten years in the trenches of analyzing and
evaluating the fundamentals of the very large "neck-out" positions that we take
in Gemini II in our constant effort to prove something out of the ordinary. In
addition, Dave Fassnacht joined us four years ago. And let's not forget our
stellar trader, Danny Hannafin. They all are remarkably well qualified, in my
judgment, to carry on the Gemini II effort. They, in turn, are buttressed and
supported by over 500 employees of Wellington Management Company.
I would be remiss if I did not mention the Vanguard tradition in
general, and Jack Bogle in particular, as a most favorable backdrop to our
accomplishment. Jack Bogle, as well as the Vanguard Board of Directors, have
provided support, encouragement, and challenge over this period, which has been
critical, particularly during the occasional "rough patches" we have
experienced. I am very appreciative and grateful for their confidence.
Well, it has been a long and worthwhile journey and I have loved and
basked in the warmth of virtually every minute of it. As I reflect back, I
have been truly blessed, as I don't know anything I would have rather done than
"perform" for Gemini II shareholders.
Respectfully,
John B. Neff, Managing Partner
Charles T. Freeman, Senior Vice President
Wellington Management Company January 15, 1996
7
<PAGE> 10
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Market
Value
Shares (000)+
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
COMMON STOCKS (47.4%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER CYCLICAL (10.7%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
AUTO & TRUCKS (10.6%)
Chrysler Corp. 415,311 $ 22,998
Ford Motor Co. 636,753 18,466
RETAIL (.1%)
Kmart Corp. 44,600 323
---------
GROUP TOTAL 41,787
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY (5.2%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Richfield Co. 83,500 9,248
Pennzoil Co. 62,300 2,632
USX-Marathon Group 307,100 5,988
* Ultramar Corp. 86,600 2,230
---------
GROUP TOTAL 20,098
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL (28.7%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
BANKS (11.5%)
Bankers Trust New York Corp. 33,492 2,227
Chemical Banking Corp. 120,600 7,085
First Union Corp. 269,200 14,974
KeyCorp 376,689 13,655
NationsBank, Inc. 99,500 6,928
INSURANCE (2.6%)
Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 3,960 274
CIGNA Corp. 94,100 9,716
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (6.9%)
Camden Property Trust 125,000 2,984
Colonial Properties Trust 74,600 1,902
Equity Residential
Properties Trust 385,000 11,791
Evans Withycombie
Residential, Inc. 195,000 4,193
Oasis Residential, Inc. 180,000 4,095
Urban Shopping Centers 82,800 1,770
SAVINGS & LOAN (7.7%)
H.F. Ahmanson & Co. 552,200 14,633
Great Western Financial Corp. 610,660 15,572
---------
GROUP TOTAL 111,799
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
TECHNOLOGY (.3%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
* Western Digital Corp. 60,804 1,087
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITIES (1.1%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Unicom Corp. 133,837 4,383
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER (1.4%) 5,510
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS
(Cost $142,624) 184,664
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKS (33.4%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
BASIC MATERIALS (30.7%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
CHEMICALS (4.7%)
Atlantic Richfield Co. 9.00% 785,500 18,459
METALS & MINING (8.5%)
(1)Kaiser Aluminum 8.255% 979,400 12,610
Reynolds Metals 7.00% 401,400 20,271
PAPER (8.1%)
Boise Cascade Corp. $1.58 170,800 4,868
Bowater, Inc. 7.00% 484,000 14,520
International Paper Co. 5.25% 270,000 12,150
STEEL (9.4%)
AK Steel Holding 7.00% 677,000 22,510
Bethlehem Steel Corp.
$3.50 258,400 11,370
$5.00 30,000 1,545
WHX Corp. 7.50% 30,000 1,275
---------
GROUP TOTAL 119,578
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY (.8%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Santa Fe Energy Resources,
Inc. 8.25% 200,000 1,950
Valero Energy $3.125 20,000 1,030
---------
GROUP TOTAL 2,980
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSPORT & SERVICES (1.9%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Delta Air Lines $3.50 127,500 7,554
---------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKS
(Cost $125,040) 130,112
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
CONVERTIBLE BONDS (2.9%)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
Face
Amount
(000)
--------
<S> <C> <C>
Conner Peripherals
6.50%, 3/1/02 $ 9,230 9,415
Toll Corp.
4.75%, 1/15/04 58 60
U.S. Home
4.875%, 11/1/05 1,750 1,662
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CONVERTIBLE BONDS
(Cost $9,034) 11,137
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
8
<PAGE> 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Face Market
Amount Value
(000) (000)+
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
BONDS (3.1%)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Geneva Steel
11.125%, 3/15/01 $ 7,000 $ 5,810
Ryland Group
9.625%, 6/1/04 2,500 2,413
Weirton Steel Corp.
10.875%, 10/15/99 4,000 4,000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL BONDS
(Cost $13,584) 12,223
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENT (17.5%)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
Collateralized by U.S. Government
Obligations in a Pooled
Cash Account
5.89%, 1/2/96
(Cost $68,214) 68,214 68,214
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (104.3%)
(Cost $358,496) 406,350
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (-4.3%)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets--Notes D and F 7,335
Federal Income Tax Payable (14,908)
Distribution Payable (5,569)
Other Liabilities--Note F (3,620)
----------
(16,762)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
NET ASSETS (100%) $389,588
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
+ See Note A to Financial Statements.
* Non-Income Producing Security.
(1) Mandatory conversion June 30, 1996.
9
<PAGE> 12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
December 31, 1995
(000)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
INVESTMENT INCOME
INCOME
Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $16,331
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,389
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,720
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPENSES
Investment Advisory Fee--Note C
Basic Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,244
Performance Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297 1,541
------
The Vanguard Group--Note D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519
Custodian Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Taxes (other than income taxes) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Auditing Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Shareholders' Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Annual Meeting and Proxy Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Directors' Fees and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,262
Expenses Paid Indirectly -- Note D . . . . . . . . . . (33)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,229
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Investment Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19,491
====================================================================================================
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS
Realized Net Gain on Investment Securities Sold . . . . . . . . $43,748
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) . . . . . . . 52,289
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on Investments . . $96,037
====================================================================================================
</TABLE>
10
<PAGE> 13
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, 1995 December 31, 1994
(000) (000)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
INCOME AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION
Balance, Beginning of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 445 $ 363
Net Investment Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,491 18,975
Distributions to Income Shareholders
($1.80 and $1.73 per share, respectively) . . . . . . . . . . . (19,656) (18,893)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, End of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 280 $ 445
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNDISTRIBUTED CAPITAL GAINS
Balance, Beginning of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $110,693 $ 98,408
Realized Net Gain on Investment Securities Sold . . . . . . . . . 43,748 18,900
Distribution to Capital Shareholders ($.11 per share) . . . . . . (1,201) --
Provision for Taxes on Capital Gains Retained . . . . . . . . . . (14,908) (6,615)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, End of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $138,332 $110,693
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNREALIZED APPRECIATION (DEPRECIATION)
OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Beginning of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (4,435) $ 41,392
End of Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,854 (4,435)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) . . . $ 52,289 $(45,827)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1995
(000)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Income Shares, $1.00 Par Value--Redeemable at $9.30 per Share on January 31, 1997:
Authorized 15,000,000 Shares; Issued and Outstanding 10,920,550 Shares . . . . $ 10,920*
Capital Surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,641*
Income Available for Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
101,841
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital Shares, $1.00 Par Value; Authorized 15,000,000 Shares;
Issued and Outstanding 10,920,550 Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,920*
Capital Surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,641*
Undistributed Capital Gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138,332
Unrealized Appreciation of Investment Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,854
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
287,747
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $389,588
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
*No change during year.
11
<PAGE> 14
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Year 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INCOME SHARES
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year. . . . . . . . . $ 9.34 $ 9.33 $ 9.33 $ 9.34 $ 9.34
Net Investment Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.79 1.74 1.66 1.66 1.65
Distributions from Net Investment Income. . . . . . (1.80) (1.73) (1.66) (1.67) (1.65)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9.33 $ 9.34 $ 9.33 $ 9.33 $ 9.34
===================================================================================================================
CAPITAL SHARES
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year. . . . . . . . . $19.03 $22.10 $18.71 $16.28 $11.51
Realized Net Gain on Investments. . . . . . . . . . 4.01 1.73 2.69 1.17 1.77
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains . . . . . (.11) -- -- (.08) (.22)
Provision for Taxes on Capital Gains Retained . . . (1.37) (.61) (.94) (.37) (.53)
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation). . . . . . . 4.79 (4.19) 1.64 1.71 3.75
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $26.35 $19.03 $22.10 $18.71 $16.28
===================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Amounts in Thousands and Per Share (unaudited)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Three Months Ended
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 31, 1995 June 30, 1995 September 30, 1995 December 31, 1995
----------------- ---------------- ------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Investment Income $ 4,785 $ .44 $ 4,320 $ .39 $ 5,181 $ .48 $5,205 $ .48
Net Realized Gain (Loss)
and Change in Unrealized
Appreciation (Depreciation) $22,699 $2.08 $32,699 $2.99 $31,715 $2.91 $8,924 $ .82
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
March 31, 1994 June 30, 1994 September 30, 1994 December 31, 1994
------------------ --------------- ------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Investment Income $ 4,504 $ .41 $4,542 $.42 $ 5,123 $ .47 $ 4,806 $ .44
Net Realized Gain (Loss)
and Change in Unrealized
Appreciation (Depreciation) $(13,003) $(1.19) $9,433 $.86 $(2,140) $(.19) $(21,217) $(1.94)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE> 15
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Gemini II is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a
diversified closed-end investment company. Certain of the Fund's investments
are in corporate debt instruments; the issuers' abilities to meet these
obligations may be affected by economic developments in their respective
industries.
A. The following significant accounting policies are in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles for investment companies. Such
policies are consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of financial
statements.
1. SECURITY VALUATION: Securities listed on an exchange are valued at the
latest quoted sales prices as of the close of the New York Stock
Exchange (generally 4:00 PM) on the valuation date; securities not
traded are valued at the mean of the latest quoted bid and asked
prices. Securities not listed are valued at the latest quoted bid
prices. Temporary cash investments are valued at amortized cost which
approximates market value.
2. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES: The Fund intends to continue to qualify as a
regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income.
Accordingly, no provision for Federal income taxes is required in the
financial statements. Realized net long-term gains, if any, on
security transactions are retained and applicable taxes thereon are
accrued at the end of the Fund's fiscal year (see Note B).
3. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS: The Fund, along with other members of The
Vanguard Group of Investment Companies, transfers uninvested cash
balances into a Pooled Cash Account, the daily aggregate of which is
invested in repurchase agreements secured by U.S. Government
obligations. Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase
agreements are held by a custodian bank until maturity of each
repurchase agreement. Provisions of the agreement require that the
market value of this collateral is sufficient in the event of default;
however, in the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to
the agreement, realization and/or retention of the collateral may be
subject to legal proceedings.
4. OTHER: Security transactions are accounted for on the date the
securities are purchased or sold. Costs used in determining realized
gains and losses on the sale of investment securities are those of
specific securities sold. Dividend income and distributions to
shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Discounts and
premiums on debt securities purchased are amortized to interest income
over the lives of the respective securities.
B. Income Shareholders are entitled to receive as distributions the
higher of $.80 per share (annually) or all of the net investment income
available for distribution. Income distributions to Capital Shareholders are
prohibited as long as any Income Shares remain outstanding. Capital
Shareholders are entitled to any net realized short-term gains on investment
securities annually.
C. Under the terms of a contract expiring January 31, 1997, the Fund pays
Wellington Management Company a basic investment advisory fee calculated at an
annual percentage rate of average net assets of the Fund. The basic fee thus
computed is subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance relative to
the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index. For the year ended December 31, 1995,
the investment advisory fee represents an effective annual base rate of .34 of
1% of average net assets before an increase of $297,000 (.08 of 1%) based on
performance.
D. The Vanguard Group, Inc. furnishes at cost corporate management,
administrative, transfer agency, marketing, and distribution services. The
costs of such services are allocated to the Fund under methods approved by the
Board of Directors. At December 31, 1995, the Fund had contributed capital of
$48,000 to Vanguard (included in Other Assets), representing .2% of Vanguard's
capitalization. The Fund's directors and officers are also directors and
officers of Vanguard.
13
<PAGE> 16
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Vanguard has requested the Fund's investment adviser to direct certain
portfolio trades, subject to obtaining the best price and execution, to brokers
who have agreed to rebate or credit to the Fund a portion of the commissions
generated. Such rebates or credits are used solely to reduce the Fund's
administrative expenses. For the year ended December 31, 1995, directed
brokerage arrangements reduced the Fund's expenses by $33,000 (.01 of 1% of
average net assets).
E. During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Fund made purchases of
$164,871,000 and sales of $241,719,000 of investment securities other than U.S.
Government securities and temporary cash investments. There were no purchases
or sales of U.S. Government securities. At December 31, 1995, unrealized
appreciation for financial reporting and Federal income tax purposes aggregated
$47,854,000, of which $51,841,000 related to appreciated securities and
$3,987,000 related to depreciated securities.
F. The market value of securities on loan to broker/dealers at December
31, 1995, was $2,558,000, for which the Fund had received cash collateral of
$2,625,000.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Gemini II
In our opinion, the accompanying statements of net assets and of shareholders'
equity and the related statements of operations and of changes in shareholders'
equity and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Gemini II (the "Fund") at December 31, 1995, and the
results of its operations, the changes in its shareholders' equity and the
financial highlights for each of the respective periods presented, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial
statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial
statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of
securities by correspondence with the custodian and brokers and the application
of alternative auditing procedures where confirmations from brokers were not
received, provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Thirty South Seventeenth Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
January 31, 1996
14
<PAGE> 17
SPECIAL TAX INFORMATION
Capital Shareholders:
Gemini II Capital Shares, of course, receive all capital appreciation (or
depreciation) from the Fund's investments, including any net capital gains that
are realized from the sale of portfolio securities. The net realized long-term
capital gains are retained in the value of the Capital Shares rather than being
distributed to shareholders. According to provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code, the Fund pays Federal income tax on these net realized long-term capital
gains at the corporate capital gains tax rate, and the amount of this tax is
deducted from the net asset value of the Capital Shares at year end.
As a result of this procedure, there are three important tax steps
which you, as a Capital Shareholder, should take:
1) You should report on your 1995 personal income tax return the net
long-term capital gains realized by your Fund during the year.
2) You should take credit for the Federal taxes paid by the Fund on these
realized gains. Since the effective personal capital gains tax rate
cannot exceed 28%, no inequity is created since you receive full
credit for the tax paid by the Fund.
3) You should increase the tax cost basis of your Capital Shares by the
amount of the after-tax gains. This is the difference between the
amount of net capital gains realized and the tax paid on these gains
by the Fund (see the table below).
Federal tax Form 2439, which you should receive by March 1, 1996,
provides for your account the specific amounts of realized capital gains and
corresponding taxes paid as discussed in 1) and 2) above. Enclosed with this
Form are specific instructions on how to record this information for tax
purposes, but please feel free to contact us if you have any questions
regarding taxes and your Gemini II Capital Shares. IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD FOR
YOU IN A NOMINEE REGISTRATION AND YOU HAVE NOT AS YET RECEIVED TAX FORM 2439,
YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR BANK OR BROKER TO OBTAIN THE FORM. A copy must be filed
with your Federal income tax return.
The table below shows: the amount of net realized capital gains per
Capital Share; the Federal taxes paid on your behalf; the Fund's capital gains
tax rate; and the amount by which your cost per share should be increased for
fiscal years 1985 through 1995.
INCOME SHAREHOLDERS:
Additional Tax Information--For your state income tax return, none of your 1995
income was derived from direct U.S. Government obligations.
Corporate shareholders should note that 83.5% of the 1995 income
qualifies for the intercorporate dividends received deduction.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Realized Long-Term Capital Gains
Per Capital Share
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REALIZED LONG-TERM
CAPITAL GAINS $.21 $2.66 $3.14 $.86 $.97 $.27 $1.56 $1.08 $2.69 $1.73 $3.90
FEDERAL CAPITAL GAINS
TAXES PAID .06 .74 1.07 .29 .33 .09 .53 .37 .94 .61 1.37
(TAX RATE IN EFFECT) (28%) (28%) (34%) (34%) (34%) (34%) (34%) (34%) (35%) (35%) (35%)
NET AMOUNT BY
WHICH YOUR COST
SHOULD BE INCREASED .15 1.92 2.07 .57 .64 .18 1.03 .71 1.75 1.12 2.53
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE> 18
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
JOHN C. BOGLE, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Chairman and Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and of each of the
investment companies in The Vanguard Group.
JOHN J. BRENNAN, President
President and Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and of each of the
investment companies in The Vanguard Group.
ROBERT E. CAWTHORN, Chairman of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc.; Director of Sun
Company, Inc.
BARBARA BARNES HAUPTFUHRER, Director of The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.,
Alco Standard Corp., Raytheon Co., Knight-Ridder, Inc., and Massachusetts
Mutual Life Insurance Co.
BRUCE K. MACLAURY, President of The Brookings Institution; Director of American
Express Bank Ltd. and The St. Paul Companies, Inc.
BURTON G. MALKIEL, Chemical Bank Chairman's Professor of Economics, Princeton
University; Director of Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Amdahl Corp.,
Baker Fentress & Co., The Jeffrey Co., and Southern New England Communications
Co.
ALFRED M. RANKIN, JR., Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
NACCO Industries, Inc.; Director of NACCO Industries, The BFGoodrich Co., and
The Standard Products Co.
JOHN C. SAWHILL, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Nature
Conservancy; formerly, Director and Senior Partner of McKinsey & Co. and
President of New York University; Director of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and
NACCO Industries.
J. LAWRENCE WILSON, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm & Haas Co.;
Director of Cummins Engine Co.; Trustee of Vanderbilt University.
OTHER FUND OFFICERS
RAYMOND J. KLAPINSKY, Secretary; Senior Vice President and Secretary of The
Vanguard Group, Inc.; Secretary of each of the investment companies in The
Vanguard Group.
RICHARD F. HYLAND, Treasurer; Treasurer of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and of
each of the investment companies in The Vanguard Group.
KAREN E. WEST, Controller; Vice President of The Vanguard Group, Inc.;
Controller of each of the investment companies in The Vanguard Group.
OTHER VANGUARD GROUP OFFICERS
ROBERT A. DISTEFANO IAN A. MACKINNON
Senior Vice President Senior Vice President
Information Technology Fixed Income Group
JEREMY G. DUFFIELD F. WILLIAM MCNABB III
Senior Vice President Senior Vice President
Planning & Development Institutional
JAMES H. GATELY RALPH K. PACKARD
Senior Vice President Senior Vice President
Individual Investor Group Chief Financial Officer
16
<PAGE> 19
THE VANGUARD FAMILY OF FUNDS
EQUITY AND BALANCED FUNDS
GROWTH AND INCOME FUNDS
Vanguard/Windsor Fund
Vanguard/Windsor II
Vanguard Equity Income Fund
Vanguard Quantitative Portfolios
Vanguard/Trustees' Equity Fund
U.S. Portfolio
Vanguard Convertible
Securities Fund
BALANCED FUNDS
Vanguard/Wellington Fund
Vanguard/Wellesley Income Fund
Vanguard STAR Portfolio
Vanguard Asset Allocation Fund
Vanguard LIFEStrategy Funds
GROWTH FUNDS
Vanguard/Morgan Growth Fund
Vanguard/PRIMECAP Fund
Vanguard U.S. Growth Portfolio
AGGRESSIVE GROWTH FUNDS
Vanguard Explorer Fund
Vanguard Specialized Portfolios
Vanguard Horizon Fund
Global Equity Portfolio
Global Asset Allocation Portfolio
Capital Opportunity Portfolio
Aggressive Growth Portfolio
INTERNATIONAL FUNDS
Vanguard International
Growth Portfolio
Vanguard/Trustees' Equity Fund
International Portfolio
INDEX FUNDS
Vanguard Index Trust
500 Portfolio
Total Stock Market Portfolio
Extended Market Portfolio
Growth Portfolio
Value Portfolio
Small Capitalization Stock Portfolio
Vanguard Tax-Managed Fund
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund
Vanguard Bond Index Fund
Total Bond Market Portfolio
Short-Term Bond Portfolio
Intermediate-Term Bond Portfolio
Long-Term Bond Portfolio
Vanguard International Equity
Index Fund
European Portfolio
Pacific Portfolio
Emerging Markets Portfolio
FIXED INCOME FUNDS
MONEY MARKET FUNDS
Vanguard Money Market Reserves
Vanguard Admiral Fund
U.S. Treasury Money Market Portfolio
TAX-EXEMPT MONEY MARKET FUNDS
Vanguard Municipal Bond Fund
Money Market Portfolio
Vanguard State Tax-Free Funds
Money Market Portfolios
(CA, NJ, OH, PA)
TAX-EXEMPT INCOME FUNDS
Vanguard Municipal Bond Fund
Vanguard State Tax-Free Funds
Insured Longer-Term Portfolios
(CA, FL, NJ, NY, OH, PA)
INCOME FUNDS
Vanguard Fixed Income
Securities Fund
Vanguard Admiral Fund
Vanguard Preferred Stock Fund
This Report has been prepared for shareholders and may be distributed to others
only if preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. All Funds in the
Vanguard Family are offered by prospectus only.
[VANGUARD GROUP LOGO]
Vanguard Financial Center
Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482
New Account Information:
1 (800) 662-7447
Shareholder Account Services:
1 (800) 662-2739
Q340-12/95
ON OUR COVER: On the evening of August 1, 1798, Lord Horatio Nelson sailed
his flagship, HMS Vanguard, into Egypt's Aboukir Bay. In a night encounter, the
British fleet annihilated Napoleon Bonaparte's ships of the line in what is
still considered to be the most complete victory ever recorded in naval
history. Our Report's cover illustration is Thomas Luny's 1830 painting, The
Battle Of The Nile, in which the French flagship, L'Orient, is shown as it
exploded at 10:00 p.m. under a gibbous moon.
<PAGE> 20
GEMINI II
EDGAR APPENDIX
This appendix describes the components of the printed version of this report
that do not translate into a format acceptable to the EDGAR system.
The cover of the printed version of this report features Thomas Luny's 1830
painting "The Battle Of The Nile".
A photograph of John C. Brennan and John C. Bogle appears on the inside cover
top-center.
A running head featuring a sword, helmet, gloves and battleships in the
background appears at the top of pages one through six.
A bar chart of the Growth Stocks versus Value Stocks (Standard & Poor's Growth
Index and Standard & Poor's Value Index) for the fiscal years 1990 through 1995
appears at the top of page two.
A bar chart illustrating Gemini II's performance for the period February 15,
1985, to December 31, 1995 appears at the bottom of page five.
A running head featuring ships wheel, rope and battleships in the background
appears at the top of page seven.
A running head featuring open log book, pen and battleships in the background
appears at the top of pages eight through fourteen.
A running head featuring an hourglass, compass & telescope and ships in the
background appears at the top of page fifteen.
A running head featuring a sextant, a map, and battleships in the background
appears at the top of page sixteen.
A running head featuring birds flying and ships in the background appears at
the top of the inside back cover.
