<PAGE>
SCHEDULE 14(A) INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-
6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting material pursuant to (S) 240.14a-11(c) or (S) 240.14a-12
Oracle Corporation
------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-
11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously by written preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1) Amount previously paid: _______________________________________________
2) Form Schedule or Registration Statement No.: __________________________
3) Filing party: _________________________________________________________
4) Date filed: ___________________________________________________________
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF ORACLE (R)]
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood City, California 94065
September 7, 1999
To our Stockholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Oracle Corporation (the "Company"). The Annual Meeting will be held on Monday,
October 18, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., in the Oracle Corporation Conference Center,
located at 350 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California.
The actions expected to be taken at the Annual Meeting are described in
detail in the attached Proxy Statement and Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Included with the Proxy Statement is a copy of the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for fiscal year 1999. We encourage you to read the Form 10-K. It
includes information on the Company's operations, markets, products and
services, as well as the Company's audited financial statements.
Please use this opportunity to take part in the affairs of the Company by
voting on the business to come before this meeting. Whether or not you plan to
attend the meeting, please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying
proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or vote electronically via the
Internet or telephone. See "Voting Via the Internet or By Telephone" in the
Proxy Statement for more details. Please note that there are separate Internet
and telephone voting arrangements depending upon whether shares are registered
in your name or in the name of a bank or broker. Returning the proxy or voting
electronically does NOT deprive you of your right to attend the meeting and to
vote your shares in person for the matters acted upon at the meeting.
We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.
Sincerely,
/s/ Lawrence J. Ellison
LAWRENCE J. ELLISON
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>
[LOGO OF ORACLE(R)]
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood City, California 94065
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To our Stockholders:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company will be held on Monday,
October 18, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., in the Oracle Corporation Conference Center,
located at 350 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, California, for the following
purposes:
1. To elect a Board of Directors to serve for the ensuing year.
2. To approve the adoption of the Company's Fiscal Year 2000 Executive
Bonus Plan.
3. To approve an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation
increasing the number of authorized shares of the Company's Common Stock
from 2,000,000,000 to 4,000,000,000 shares.
4. To approve an amendment to the Company's 1991 Long-Term Equity Incentive
Plan increasing the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock
reserved for issuance thereunder by 70,000,000 shares.
5. To ratify the appointment of Arthur Andersen LLP as independent public
accountants for the Company for the current fiscal year.
6. To transact any other business that may properly come before the
meeting.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on August 20, 1999 will be
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any
continuation or adjournment thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Daniel Cooperman
DANIEL COOPERMAN
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
& Secretary
Redwood City, California
September 7, 1999
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete, sign, date
and return the accompanying proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or
vote electronically via the Internet or telephone.
<PAGE>
PROXY STATEMENT
September 7, 1999
The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors (the
"Board") of Oracle Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for
use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the "Annual
Meeting"). The Annual Meeting will be held on Monday October 18, 1999, at
10:00 a.m., in the Oracle Corporation Conference Center, located at 350 Oracle
Parkway, Redwood City, California. All holders of record of Common Stock, par
value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), at the close of business on August
20, 1999, the record date, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At
the close of business on the record date, the Company had 1,417,525,714 shares
of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote. A majority, 708,762,858, of
these shares of Common Stock will constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement, the accompanying proxy,
and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K were first mailed to stockholders
on or about September 7, 1999. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
contains the information required by Rule 14a-3 of the Rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").
VOTING RIGHTS AND SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
Stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held.
Shares of Common Stock may not be voted cumulatively.
Any person signing a proxy in the form accompanying this Proxy Statement has
the power to revoke it either before the meeting at which the matter voted by
proxy is acted upon or at the meeting before the vote on the matter. A proxy
may be revoked by a later proxy that is signed by the person who signed the
earlier proxy and presented at the meeting or by attendance at the meeting and
voting in person.
The expense of printing and mailing proxy material will be borne by the
Company. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, solicitation may
be made by directors, officers, and other employees of the Company by personal
interview, telephone, or facsimile. No additional compensation will be paid
for such solicitation. The Company also has retained Corporate Investor
Communications, Inc. ("CIC") to assist in the solicitation of proxies. CIC
will receive a fee for such services of approximately $12,500, plus reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses, which will be paid by the Company. The Company will
request brokers and nominees who hold shares of Common Stock in their names to
furnish proxy material to beneficial owners of the shares and will reimburse
such brokers and nominees for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding
solicitation materials to such beneficial owners.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will elect directors to hold office
until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until successors have been
duly elected and qualified or until any such director's earlier resignation or
removal. Shares represented by the accompanying proxy will be voted for the
election of the nine nominees recommended by the Board of Directors, unless
the proxy is marked in such a manner as to withhold authority to vote or as to
vote for one or more alternate candidates. If any nominee for any reason is
unable to serve or will not serve, the proxies may be voted for such
substitute nominee as the proxyholder may determine. The Company is not aware
of any nominee who will be unable to or for good cause will not serve as a
director.
Directors
The following incumbent directors are being nominated for re-election to the
Board: Lawrence J. Ellison, Donald L. Lucas, Michael J. Boskin, Raymond J.
Lane, Jeffrey O. Henley, Jack F. Kemp, Jeffrey Berg, Richard A. McGinn and Kay
Koplovitz.
1
<PAGE>
Required Vote
Directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast. Votes withheld and
broker non-votes are not counted toward a nominee's total.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote
for the election of each of the nominated directors.
Mr. Ellison, 55, has been Chief Executive Officer and a director of the
Company since he co-founded the Company in May 1977. Mr. Ellison has been
Chairman of the Board since June 1995 and served as Chairman of the Board from
April 1990 until September 1992. He also served as President of the Company
from May 1977 to June 1996. Mr. Ellison is co-chairman of California's Council
on Information Technology. He is also a director of Apple Computer, Inc.,
Liberate Technologies, a computer software company, and SuperGen, Inc., a
pharmaceutical company.
Mr. Lucas, 69, has been a director of the Company since March 1980. He has
been Chairman of the Executive Committee since 1986 and Chairman of the
Finance and Audit Committee since 1987. Mr. Lucas has been a member of the
Committee on Compensation and Management Development (the "Compensation
Committee") since 1989 and a member of the Nominating Committee since December
1996. He was Chairman of the Board from October 1980 through March 1990. He
has been a venture capitalist since 1960. He also serves as a director of
Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Coulter Pharmaceutical, Inc., Macromedia, Inc.,
Transcend Services, Inc., and Tricord Systems, Inc.
Dr. Boskin, 53, has been a director of the Company since May 1994. He has
been a member of the Finance and Audit Committee and the Nominating Committee
since July 1994 and a member of the Compensation Committee since July 1995. He
was appointed Chairman of the Compensation Committee by the Board in July
1997. Dr. Boskin has been a professor of economics at Stanford University
since 1971 and is Chief Executive Officer and President of Boskin & Co., Inc.,
a consulting firm. He was Chairman of the President's Council of Economic
Advisers from February 1989 until January 1993. Dr. Boskin also serves as a
director of Exxon Corporation, First Health Group Corp., and Vodafone AirTouch
Public Limited Company.
Mr. Lane, 52, has been President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company
since July 1996. Mr. Lane served as Executive Vice President of the Company
and President of Worldwide Operations from October 1993 to June 1996 and has
been a director since June 1995. He served as a Senior Vice President of the
Company and President of Oracle USA from June 1992 to September 1993. Before
joining Oracle, Mr. Lane was a Senior Vice President and Managing Partner of
the Worldwide Information Technology Group at Booz-Allen & Hamilton from July
1986 to May 1992. He served on the Booz-Allen & Hamilton Executive Committee
and its Board of Directors from April 1987 to May 1992. Mr. Lane is also a
member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie-Mellon University and serves on
the Board of Directors of Special Olympics International. Mr. Lane is a
director of Marimba Inc., a computer software company.
Mr. Henley, 54, has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company since March 1991 and has been a director since June
1995. Prior to joining Oracle, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Pacific Holding Company, a privately-held company with
diversified interests in manufacturing and real estate, from August 1986 to
February 1991. Mr. Henley is a director of Liberate Technologies.
Mr. Kemp, 64, has served as a director of the Company since February 1997
and previously served as a director of the Company from February 1995 until
September 1996. Mr. Kemp has been Co-Director of Empower America from 1993 to
the present. Mr. Kemp served as a member of Congress for 18 years and as
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from February 1989 until January
1992. In 1996, Mr. Kemp was the Republican candidate for Vice President of the
United States. Mr. Kemp also serves as a director of Carson,
2
<PAGE>
Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of ethnic hair care products, Everen Capital
Corporation, a securities firm, The Sports Authority, Inc., a sporting goods
retailer, JumpMusic.com, Inc., an online music products retailer, Proxicom,
Inc., a provider of internet solutions, Speedway Motorsports, Inc., a leading
sponsor of motorsports in the United States and ZapMe! Corporation, a provider
of interactive network solutions to schools.
Mr. Berg, 52, has been a director of the Company since March 1997. He has
been a member of the Finance and Audit Committee since April 1997. Mr. Berg
has been an agent in the entertainment industry for over 25 years and the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of International Creative Management,
Inc., a talent agency for the entertainment industry, since 1985. He served as
Co-Chair of California's Council on Information Technology and was President
of the Executive Board of the College of Letters and Sciences at the
University of California at Berkeley. Mr. Berg is also a director of Shaman
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a developer of pharmaceutical products.
Mr. McGinn, 52, has been a director of the Company since March 1997. Mr.
McGinn has served as the Chairman of the Board of Lucent Technologies, Inc.
("Lucent Technologies") since February 1998 and has been its Chief Executive
Officer since October 1997. He has been President since February 1996, and was
Chief Operating Officer from February 1996 to October 1997. Lucent
Technologies previously was the communications and technology subsidiary of
AT&T that was spun off in April 1996. Mr. McGinn served as Executive Vice
President of AT&T and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Network Systems from
October 1994 to April 1996. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer
of AT&T Network Systems from August 1993 to October 1994 and as a Senior Vice
President from August 1992 to August 1993. Mr. McGinn also serves as a
director of the American Express Company.
Ms. Koplovitz, 54, has been a director of the Company since October 1998.
She has been a member of the Nominating Committee since July 1999. Since June
1998, she has served as Chief Executive Officer of Koplovitz & Co., a company
specializing in media start-up ventures. She is the Founder of USA Networks,
and served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from its premiere in
1977 as television's first advertiser-supported basic cable network until June
1998. In 1992, Ms. Koplovitz launched the Sci-Fi Channel, which has become one
of the industry's fastest-growing networks. Ms. Koplovitz is also a director
of Nabisco Holdings Corp., and Liz Claiborne, Inc. In June 1998, Ms. Koplovitz
was appointed by President Clinton to chair the National Women's Business
Council.
Director Compensation
The Company currently pays Messrs. Kemp, Berg and McGinn and Ms. Koplovitz
an annual retainer of $30,000 each. Dr. Boskin currently is paid an annual
retainer of $70,000 and Mr. Lucas currently is paid an annual retainer of
$120,000 in connection with their additional board committee duties. Non-
employee members of the Board also receive directors' fees of (1) $1,500 for
each regularly scheduled Board meeting attended, (2) $3,000 for each meeting
of the Finance and Audit Committee attended, and (3) $2,000 per day for each
special meeting or committee meeting attended. Non-employee members of the
Board also participate in the Company's 1993 Directors' Stock Option Plan,
which provides for the following grants of options to purchase Common Stock of
the Company to non-employee members of the Board: options to purchase 75,000
shares of Common Stock as of the date an individual becomes a non-employee
director; options to purchase 27,000 shares of Common Stock on May 31st of
each year provided such director has served on the Board for at least
six months; and in lieu of the latter option grant, options to purchase 60,000
shares of Common Stock on May 31st of each year to the director (or directors)
who serves as chairman of either the Executive Committee or the Finance and
Audit Committee (or both), provided such director has served in such capacity
for at least one year and options to purchase 37,500 shares of Common Stock on
May 31st of each year to the director who serves as chairman of the
Compensation Committee, provided such director has served as a member of such
committee for at least one year. Messrs. Ellison, Lane and Henley are
employees of the Company and are not separately compensated as directors of
the Company.
3
<PAGE>
Board of Directors' Meetings and Committees
The Board of Directors met four times at regularly scheduled meetings and
twice at special meetings during fiscal year 1999. During that same period,
the Board acted seven times by unanimous written consent. Standing committees
of the Board currently include, among others, the Executive Committee, the
Finance and Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating
Committee. Each incumbent director has attended at least 75% of all Board
meetings and applicable committee meetings, except Mr. McGinn, who attended
three of four regularly scheduled Board meetings and one of two special Board
meetings.
Messrs. Ellison, Lucas and Henley are presently the members of the Executive
Committee. The Executive Committee did not meet during fiscal year 1999, and
during that same period acted fifteen times by unanimous written consent.
Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the Executive Committee is generally
vested with all the powers of the Board of Directors, except that the
Executive Committee cannot take action beyond certain financial limits,
liquidate the Company, sell all or substantially all of the Company's assets,
merge the Company with another company where the Company is not the surviving
entity, or take any other action not permitted to be delegated to a committee
under Delaware law or the Company's Bylaws.
Messrs. Lucas and Berg and Dr. Boskin are presently the members of the
Finance and Audit Committee. The Finance and Audit Committee met four times
during fiscal year 1999. The primary function of the Finance and Audit
Committee is to provide advice with respect to the Company's financial matters
and to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities regarding finance, accounting, tax and legal compliance
matters. The Committee's primary duties and responsibilities are to: (1) serve
as an independent and objective party to monitor the Company's financial
reporting process and internal control system; (2) review and appraise the
audit efforts of the Company's independent accountants and internal auditing
department; (3) evaluate the Company's quarterly financial performance and
forecasts as well as its compliance with laws and regulations; (4) oversee
management's establishment and enforcement of financial policies and business
practices; and (5) provide an open avenue of communication among the
independent accountants, financial and senior management, counsel, the
internal auditing department, and the Board of Directors.
Dr. Boskin and Mr. Lucas are presently the members of the Compensation
Committee. The Compensation Committee met three times during fiscal year 1999,
and during that same period acted forty-six times by unanimous written
consent. The function of the Compensation Committee is to: (1) review and set
the compensation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and certain of its
most highly compensated officers, including salary, bonuses and other
incentive plans, stock options and other forms of compensation; (2) administer
the Company's stock plans and approve stock option awards; and (3) to oversee
the career development of senior management.
Dr. Boskin, Mr. Lucas and Ms. Koplovitz are presently the members of the
Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee met once during fiscal year
1999, and during that same period acted once by unanimous written consent. The
function of the Nominating Committee is to recommend qualified candidates for
election as officers and directors of the Company. Stockholders wishing to
recommend candidates for consideration by the Nominating Committee may do so
by writing to the Secretary of the Company and providing the candidate's name,
biographical data and qualifications.
4
<PAGE>
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information, as of August 20, 1999
with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock by: (i)
each stockholder known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than
5% of the Company's Common Stock; (ii) each director; (iii) each executive
officer named in the Summary Compensation Table; and (iv) all current
executive officers and directors as a group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percent
Amount and Nature of of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership(1) Class
------------------------------------ ----------------------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Lawrence J. Ellison(2).......................... 344,039,276 24.0%
500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065
Raymond J. Lane(3).............................. 5,633,191 *
Gary L. Bloom(4)................................ 909,445 *
Jeffrey O. Henley(5)............................ 4,035,207 *
Jay Nussbaum(6)................................. 185,892 *
Donald L. Lucas(7).............................. 246,166 *
Michael J. Boskin(8)............................ 224,529 *
Jack Kemp(9).................................... 63,013 *
Jeffrey Berg(10)................................ 63,000 *
Richard A. McGinn(11)........................... 63,000 *
Kay Koplovitz(12)............................... 18,750 *
All current executive officers and directors
as a group (17 persons)(13).................... 356,679,528 24.7%
</TABLE>
- --------
*Less than 1%
(1) Unless otherwise indicated below, each stockholder listed had sole voting
and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned,
subject to community property laws, if applicable.
(2) Includes 13,431,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(3) Includes 5,618,890 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(4) Includes 5,495 shares in trust. Includes 860,249 shares subject to
currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days.
(5) Includes 4,026,568 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(6) Includes 179,949 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(7) Includes 13,275 shares held in trust. Includes 232,891 shares subject to
currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days.
(8) Includes 224,529 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(9) Includes 63,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(10) Includes 63,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
5
<PAGE>
(11) Includes 63,000 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(12) Includes 18,750 shares subject to currently exercisable options or
options exercisable within 60 days.
(13) Includes all shares described in notes (2)-(12) above and 1,128,584
additional shares subject to currently exercisable options or options
exercisable within 60 days.
6
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation
The following table provides certain summary information concerning
compensation paid by the Company to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
each of the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the
Company (determined as of May 31, 1999) (hereinafter referred to as the "named
executive officers") for the fiscal years ended May 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997.
Summary Compensation Table
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-Term
Compensation
Annual Compensation Awards
--------------------- ------------
Securities
Underlying
Options/SARs
Name and Principal Position Fiscal Year Salary($) Bonus($) (#)(1)
--------------------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Lawrence J. Ellison........... 1999 $1,000,000 $2,752,000 1,500,000
Chairman and 1998 $ 999,987 $ 530,000 0
Chief Executive Officer 1997 $ 999,985 $1,850,000 3,600,000
Raymond J. Lane............... 1999 $1,000,000 $2,250,000 1,125,000
President and Chief 1998 $ 974,991 $ 206,250 0
Operating Officer 1997 $ 883,334 $1,395,000 6,187,500
Gary L. Bloom................. 1999 $ 888,864 $2,352,919 1,800,000
Executive Vice President 1998 $ 334,713 $ 200,000 1,050,000
1997 $ 279,984 $ 200,000 0
Jeffrey O. Henley............. 1999 $ 727,500 $1,334,609 600,000
Executive Vice President 1998 $ 645,000 $ 113,437 0
and Chief Financial Officer 1997 $ 591,666 $ 852,000 1,237,500
Jay Nussbaum.................. 1999 $ 525,000 $1,151,730 750,000
Executive Vice President, 1998 $ 345,600 $ 386,996 180,000
Oracle Service Industries 1997 $ 315,600 $ 454,441 0
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) All figures in this column reflect options to purchase common stock and
adjustments, to the extent applicable, for two 3-for-2 stock splits
effective August 15, 1997 and February 26, 1999, respectively.
7
<PAGE>
Stock Options
The following table sets forth information concerning the grant of stock
options to each of the named executive officers in fiscal year 1999:
Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants
--------------------------------------------------
Percent of Potential Realizable
Total Value at Assumed Annual
Number of Options/SARs Rates of Stock Price
Securities Granted to Appreciation for Option
Underlying Employees in Exercise or Term
Options/ SARs Fiscal Year Base Expiration -----------------------
Name Granted(#)(1) 1999 Price($/sh) Date 5%($) 10%($)
---- ------------- ------------ ----------- ---------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Lawrence J. Ellison..... 1,500,000(2) 3.59 $16.71 7/13/08 $15,761,640 $39,943,091
Raymond J. Lane......... 1,125,000(2) 2.69 $16.71 7/13/08 $11,821,230 $29,957,318
Gary L. Bloom........... 300,000(2) .72 $16.71 7/13/08 $ 3,152,328 $ 7,988,618
1,500,000(3) 3.59 $15.92 10/09/08 $15,014,891 $38,050,681
Jeffrey O. Henley....... 600,000(2) 1.43 $16.71 7/13/08 $ 6,304,656 $15,977,236
Jay Nussbaum............ 375,000(4) .90 $16.29 7/10/08 $ 3,842,161 $ 9,736,790
375,000(5) .90 $32.46 1/22/09 $ 7,654,819 $19,398,814
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Each option granted vests at the rate of 25% per annum. Options will
become immediately exercisable if 50% of the voting stock of the Company
is acquired in a transaction or series of transactions expressly
disapproved by the Board. Each option was granted under the Company's 1991
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan and has an exercise price equal to the
fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant.
(2) Option granted on July 13, 1998.
(3) Option granted on October 9, 1998.
(4) Option granted on July 10, 1998.
(5) Option granted on January 22, 1999.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the named
executive officers concerning exercises of options during fiscal year 1999 and
unexercised options held as of the end of fiscal year 1999.
Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and
Fiscal Year-End Option/SAR Values
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Value Underlying Options/SARs in-the-Money Options/SARs
Shares Acquired Realized at Fiscal Year-End (#) at Fiscal Year-End ($)
Name on Exercise (#) ($) Exercisable/Unexercisable Exercisable/Unexercisable
---- --------------- ----------- ------------------------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Lawrence J. Ellison..... 390,000 $10,032,243 12,999,750/3,693,750 $223,533,399/$23,121,426
Raymond J. Lane......... 951,495 $18,645,498 5,478,265/4,415,625 $ 52,814,267/$25,696,150
Gary L. Bloom........... 55,875 $ 906,609 427,405/2,257,032 $ 5,060,148/$17,410,161
Jeffrey O. Henley....... 150,000 $ 3,768,244 3,848,443/1,415,625 $ 56,616,094/$ 9,093,145
Jay Nussbaum............ 39,375 $ 418,594 168,752/ 851,250 $ 2,585,080/$ 3,656,316
</TABLE>
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee currently consists of Dr. Boskin and Mr. Lucas.
No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries during fiscal year 1999. None of the
executive officers of the Company has served on the board of directors or on
the compensation committee of any other entity, any of whose officers served
either on the Board of Directors or on the Compensation Committee of the
Company.
8
<PAGE>
Report of Committee on Compensation and Management Development
of the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company's
previous or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") that might incorporate this Proxy
Statement or future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
whole or in part, the following report and the Performance Graph which follows
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filing.
Membership and Role of the Committee on Compensation and Management
Development
The Committee on Compensation and Management Development (the "Compensation
Committee") consists of the following non-employee members of the Company's
Board of Directors: Michael J. Boskin and Donald L. Lucas.
The Compensation Committee reviews and determines the Company's executive
compensation objectives and policies, administers the Company's stock plans
and grants stock options and monitors and oversees the career development of
management personnel. In fiscal year 1999, the Board of Directors expanded the
charter of the Compensation Committee to include overseeing management career
development and accordingly changed the Compensation Committee's name. The
Compensation Committee's purview was expanded, in part, to help the Company
attract, develop and retain talented executive personnel in an extremely
competitive market.
Within the Silicon Valley, competition for executive talent is especially
intense in the information technology industry. With this perspective, the
Compensation Committee reviews and sets the compensation of the Company's
Chief Executive Officer and the other members of the Company's executive
management committee.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation that may
be deducted by the Company in any year with respect to certain of the
Company's highest paid executives. Certain performance-based compensation that
has been approved by stockholders is not subject to the deduction limit. The
Company intends to qualify certain compensation paid to executive officers for
deductibility under the Code, including Section 162(m). However, the Company
may from time to time pay compensation to its executive officers that may not
be deductible.
Executive Compensation Program
Objectives
The objectives of the Company's executive compensation program are to:
--Attract and retain highly talented and productive executives.
--Provide incentives for superior performance by paying above-average
compensation.
--Align the interests of executive officers with the interests of the
Company's stockholders by basing a significant portion of compensation
upon the Company's performance.
Components
The Company's executive compensation program combines the following three
components, in addition to the benefit plans offered to all employees: base
salary; annual bonus; and long-term incentive compensation consisting of stock
option grants.
It is the Company's policy to set base salary levels, annual bonuses and
long-term incentive compensation above an average of select corporations to
which the Company compares its executive compensation. The
9
<PAGE>
Company selects such corporations on the basis of a number of factors, such as
their size and complexity, the nature of their businesses, the regions in
which they operate, the structure of their compensation programs (including
the extent to which they rely on bonuses and other contingent compensation)
and the availability of compensation information. The corporations against
which the Company compares its compensation are not necessarily those included
in the indices used to compare the stockholder return in the Stock Performance
Chart. Further, the corporations selected for such comparison may vary from
year to year based upon market conditions and changes in both the Company's
and the corporations' businesses over time. The Company believes that above-
average compensation levels are necessary to attract and retain high caliber
executives necessary for the successful conduct of the Company's business.
Each component of the Company's executive compensation program serves a
specific purpose in meeting the Company's objectives. The components of the
Company's executive compensation program are described below, except for any
limitations arising from certain provisions of employment agreements that the
Company enters into upon hiring an executive.
Base salary. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the salaries of the
Company's executives. When setting base salary levels, in a manner consistent
with the objectives outlined above, the Committee considers competitive market
conditions for executive compensation, Company performance and individual
performance.
The measures of individual performance considered in setting fiscal year
1999 salaries included, to the extent applicable to an individual executive
officer, a number of quantitative and qualitative factors such as the
Company's historical and recent financial performance in the principal area of
responsibility of the officer (including such measures as gross margin, net
income, sales, customer count and market share), the individual's progress
toward non-financial goals within his area of responsibility, individual
performance, experience and level of responsibility and other contributions
made to the Company's success. The Compensation Committee has not found it
practicable, nor has it attempted, to assign relative weights to the specific
factors used in determining base salary levels, and the specific factors used
may vary among individual officers. As is typical for most corporations,
payment of base salary is not conditioned upon the achievement of any
specific, pre-determined performance targets.
Annual bonus. The Company's cash bonus program seeks to motivate executives
to work effectively to achieve the Company's financial performance objectives
and to reward them when objectives are met. Fiscal year 1999 executive bonus
payments for Messrs. Ellison, Lane, Henley and Bloom were based upon earnings
per share and revenue growth and increased based on the Company's revenue
growth changes in relation to the revenue growth of one of the Company's
competitors designated by the Committee. In Mr. Bloom's case, part of his
bonus also related to his agreement to accept additional responsibilities at
the Company. The executive bonus payments for the other executive vice
presidents were based upon certain components of the Company's revenues,
margins, leadership, customer satisfaction and expense control.
Long-term incentive compensation. The Company believes that option grants
(1) align executive interests with stockholder interests by creating a direct
link between compensation and stockholder return, (2) give executives a
significant, long-term interest in the Company's success and (3) help retain
key executives in a competitive market for executive talent.
The Company's 1990 Executive Officers Stock Option Plan and 1991 Long-Term
Equity Incentive Plan authorize the Committee to grant stock options to
executives. Option grants are made from time to time to executives whose
contributions have or will have a significant impact on the Company's long-
term performance. The Company's determination of whether option grants are
appropriate each year is based upon individual performance measures
established for each individual. Options are not necessarily granted to each
executive during each year. Generally, options granted to executive officers
vest in equal annual installments over a period of four years and expire ten
years from the date of grant.
10
<PAGE>
Benefits. The Company believes that it must offer a competitive benefit
program to attract and retain key executives.
During fiscal year 1999, the Company provided medical and other benefits to
its executive officers that are generally available to the Company's other
employees.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer's
compensation plan for fiscal year 1999 included the same elements and
performance measures as the plans of the Company's other executive officers.
Mr. Ellison's salary for fiscal year 1999, as compared to fiscal year 1998,
effectively remained unchanged and his bonus for fiscal year 1999 increased
419% compared to the previous fiscal year. The increase in Mr. Ellison's bonus
reflects the application of the fiscal year 1999 bonus plan, as adopted by the
stockholders of the Company on October 19, 1998, to the Company's financial
results for fiscal year 1999 reduced with respect to the formulaic portion of
his bonus.
Submitted by: Michael J. Boskin
Donald L. Lucas
11
<PAGE>
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the
Company's Common Stock with the cumulative total return on the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index and the Hambrecht & Quist ("H&Q") Technology Index for the
five fiscal years commencing May 31, 1994 and ending May 31, 1999, assuming an
investment of $100 and the reinvestment of any dividends.
The comparisons in the graph below are based upon historical data and are
not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, future performance of the
Company's Common Stock.
Cumulative Total Return
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
5/94 5/95 5/96 5/97 5/98 5/99
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Oracle Corporation ORCL 100 152 218 306 233 367
S&P 500 1500 100 120 154 200 261 316
H&Q Technology 1HQT 100 148 209 251 301 460
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE>
Transactions and Legal Actions Involving Management
From June 1, 1998 to the present, there have been no transactions, or
currently proposed transactions, between the Company or any of its
subsidiaries and any executive officer, director, 5% beneficial owner of the
Company's Common Stock, or member of the immediate family of the foregoing
persons in which one of the foregoing individuals or entities had an interest
of more than $60,000, except for the following:
The Company develops and licenses software products which may be used with a
computer manufactured by nCUBE, a manufacturer of massively-parallel
supercomputers. Mr. Ellison owns a controlling interest in nCUBE. During
fiscal year 1998, the Company purchased from nCUBE approximately $13,000 of
computer equipment and maintenance and related services. During fiscal year
1999, the Company purchased $565,000 in computer equipment from nCUBE. The
Company has also entered into a reseller agreement with nCUBE entitling nCUBE
to distribute certain software which the Company has a license to distribute.
During fiscal year 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with MindQ
LLC, a company in which Mr. Ellison owns a controlling interest, which allows
the Company to resell some of MindQ LLC's existing courses as well as certain
additional courses that will be developed by MindQ LLC at its cost. Recently,
the Company has proposed to pay MindQ $375,000 to develop three courses on
behalf of the Company.
During fiscal year 1999, the Company leased two aircraft from Wing and a
Prayer, Incorporated, which is owned by Mr. Ellison. The aggregate amount
billed to the Company for the use of the aircraft was approximately
$1,074,000. The Company believes that the amount billed for the use of the
aircraft and the pilots are within the range charged by third-party commercial
charter companies for similar model aircraft. The Company and Mr. Ellison have
negotiated an indemnity agreement pursuant to which Mr. Ellison would
indemnify the Company up to $250,000,000 in the event that Wing and a Prayer's
aviation insurance policy does not provide full coverage to the Company.
During fiscal year 1999, Lucent Technologies, of which Mr. McGinn is
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, purchased $24,193,152 of property and
services from the Company. In addition, the Company purchased $94,872 of
property and services from Lucent Technologies.
Shareholder class actions were filed in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of San Mateo against the Company and its Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Operating Officer on and after December 18, 1997. The class
actions are brought on behalf of purchasers of the stock of the Company during
the period April 29, 1997 through December 9, 1997. Plaintiffs allege that the
defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company's actual and
expected financial performance, while selling Company stock, in violation of
state securities laws. Plaintiffs further allege that the individual
defendants sold Company stock while in possession of material non-public
information. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to these
actions and intends to vigorously defend them.
A shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the
State of California, County of San Mateo on November 17, 1998. The derivative
suit was brought by Company stockholders, allegedly on behalf of the Company,
against certain of the Company's officers and directors. The derivative
plaintiffs allege that these officers and directors breached their fiduciary
duties to the Company by making or causing to be made alleged misstatements
about the Company's revenue, growth and financial status while certain
officers and directors sold Company stock and by allowing the Company to be
sued in the shareholder class actions. The derivative plaintiffs seek
compensatory and other damages, disgorgement of compensation received, and
temporary and permanent injunctions requiring the defendants to relinquish
their directorships. On January 15, 1999, the Court entered a stipulation and
order staying the action until further notice.
13
<PAGE>
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's officers and
directors and persons who own more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock
(collectively, "Reporting Persons") to file reports of ownership and changes
in ownership with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulations
to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received or written
representations from the Reporting Persons, the Company believes that with
respect to the fiscal year ended May 31, 1999, all the Reporting Persons
complied with all applicable filing requirements, except that Randall Baker
filed a Form 5 in lieu of amending his timely filed Form 3 to report his
401(k) holdings in the Oracle Stock Fund.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
ADOPTION OF THE
FISCAL YEAR 2000 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
On July 9, 1999 and August 26, 1999, the Compensation Committee unanimously
approved the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2000 Executive Bonus Plan (the "Bonus
Plan"), and the Board directed that the Bonus Plan be submitted to the
stockholders at the 1999 Annual Meeting. Targets set at the July 9, 1999
meeting and in the August 26, 1999 written consent for the applicable
performance period shall be null and void and no payments pursuant thereto may
be made if the Bonus Plan is not approved by the stockholders of the Company.
The purpose of the Bonus Plan is to motivate executives to achieve the
Company's financial performance objectives and to reward them when those
objectives are met.
Required Vote
Approval of the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2000 Executive Bonus Plan
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of Common
Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of
determining whether a quorum is present, and broker non-votes will not be
treated as entitled to vote on this matter at the Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for
approval of adoption of the Fiscal Year 2000 Executive Bonus Plan.
Description of the Fiscal Year 2000 Executive Bonus Plan
History. The Compensation Committee approved the adoption of the Fiscal Year
2000 Executive Bonus Plan (the "Bonus Plan") at a meeting held on July 9, 1999
and a written consent dated August 26, 1999.
Purpose. The purpose of the Bonus Plan is to motivate executives to achieve
the Company's financial performance objectives and to reward them when those
objectives are met.
Administration. The Bonus Plan will be administered by the Compensation
Committee consisting of no fewer than two members of the Board, all of whom
qualify as "outside directors" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code ("Code Section 162(m)").
Eligibility. Participants in the Bonus Plan are chosen solely at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee. All officers of the Company are
eligible to participate in the Bonus Plan. No person is automatically entitled
to participate in the Bonus Plan in any plan year.
14
<PAGE>
Determination of Awards. Under the Bonus Plan, participants will be eligible
to receive awards based upon the attainment and certification of certain
performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee. If the Company
reports a profit of at least one billion dollars for its fiscal year 2000, Mr.
Lane will receive a bonus of $200,000 and Mr. Bloom will receive a bonus of
$100,000. As an additional part of the Bonus Plan, Messrs. Lane, Henley and
Bloom will receive awards based upon the Company's earnings per share which
awards will consist of a percentage of base salary (including, in Mr. Lane's
and Mr. Bloom's cases, the profitability bonus, if any, described above). The
Compensation Committee adopts the performance criteria within 90 days after
the start of each fiscal year or in advance of such other date as may be
permitted under Code Section 162(m). With respect to fiscal year 2000, such
determinations were made by the Committee at a meeting held on July 9, 1999
and a written consent dated August 26, 1999. The details of the formula have
not been included in this Proxy Statement to maintain the confidentiality of
the Company's earnings expectations which the Company believes are
confidential commercial or business information, the disclosure of which would
adversely affect the Company.
Payment of Awards. All awards will be paid in cash as soon as is practicable
following determination of the award, unless the Committee has, prior to the
grant of an award, received and approved, in its sole discretion, a request by
a participant to defer receipt of an award in accordance with the Bonus Plan.
Estimate of Benefits. The amounts that will be paid pursuant to the Bonus
Plan are not currently determinable. The maximum bonus payment that any
executive officer could receive under the Bonus Plan would be four times the
sum of his base salary and, in Mr. Lane's and Mr. Bloom's cases, the
profitability bonus, if any. In the past, bonus payments have ranged from
about one-eighth to three times base compensation. The most highly paid
executive officer's base compensation for this purpose is $1,200,000.
Amendment and Termination. The Committee may terminate the Bonus Plan, in
whole or in part, suspend the Bonus Plan, in whole or in part from time to
time, and amend the Bonus Plan, from time to time, including the adoption of
amendments deemed necessary or desirable to correct any defect or supply
omitted data or reconcile any inconsistency in the Bonus Plan or in any award
granted thereunder so long as stockholder approval has been obtained if
required in order for awards under the Bonus Plan to qualify as "performance-
based compensation" under Code Section 162(m). No amendment, termination or
modification of the Bonus Plan may in any manner affect awards theretofore
granted without the consent of the participant unless the Committee has made a
determination that an amendment or modification is in the best interests of
all persons to whom awards have been previously granted, but in no event may
such amendment or modification result in an increase in the amount of
compensation payable pursuant to such award.
Termination of Employment. Should the participant's employment with the
Company terminate for any reason during the plan year, the participant will
not be eligible to receive an award under the Bonus Plan.
Federal Income Tax Consequences. Under present federal income tax law,
participants will realize ordinary income equal to the amount of the award
received in the year of receipt. That income will be subject to applicable
income and employment tax withholding by the Company. The Company will receive
a deduction for the amount constituting ordinary income to the participant,
provided that the Bonus Plan satisfies the requirements of Code Section
162(m), which limits the deductibility of nonperformance-related compensation
paid to certain corporate executives (and otherwise satisfies the requirements
for deductibility under federal income tax law).
15
<PAGE>
PROPOSAL NO. 3
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
On July 12, 1999, the Board authorized an amendment of the Company's
Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share ("Common Stock"), from 2,000,000,000 to
4,000,000,000. The stockholders are being asked to approve this proposed
amendment. As of August 20, 1999, 1,417,525,714 shares of Common Stock were
issued and outstanding and 286,616,056 shares were reserved for issuance under
the Company's stock plans and employee stock purchase plan.
Required Vote
The approval of the adoption of the amendment to the Company's Certificate
of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock. Abstentions and broker non-
votes are not affirmative votes and, therefore, will have the same effect as a
vote against the proposal.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for approval
of the amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation.
The Board believes that the proposed increase is desirable so that, as the
need may arise, the Company will have more flexibility to issue shares of
Common Stock without the expense and delay of a special stockholders' meeting,
in connection with possible future stock dividends or stock splits, equity
financings, future opportunities for expanding the business through
investments or acquisitions, management incentive and employee benefit plans
and for other general corporate purposes.
Authorized but unissued shares of the Company's Common Stock may be issued
at such times, for such purposes and for such consideration as the Board of
Directors may determine to be appropriate without further authority from the
Company's stockholders, except as otherwise required by applicable law or
stock exchange policies.
The increase in authorized Common Stock will not have any immediate effect
on the rights of existing stockholders. However, the Board will have the
authority to issue authorized Common Stock without requiring future
stockholder approval of such issuances, except as may be required by
applicable law or exchange regulations. To the extent that additional
authorized shares are issued in the future, they will decrease the existing
stockholders' percentage equity ownership and, depending upon the price at
which they are issued, could be dilutive to the existing stockholders. The
holders of Common Stock have no preemptive rights.
The increase in the authorized number of shares of Common Stock and the
subsequent issuance of such shares could have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change in control of the Company without further action by the
stockholders. Shares of authorized and unissued Common Stock could be issued
(within the limits imposed by applicable law) in one or more transactions
which would make a change in control of the Company more difficult, and
therefore less likely. Any such issuance of additional stock could have the
effect of diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of
outstanding shares of Common Stock, and such additional shares could be used
to dilute the stock ownership or voting rights of a person seeking to obtain
control of the Company. The Company has previously adopted certain measures
that may have the effect of helping to resist an unsolicited takeover attempt.
16
<PAGE>
PROPOSAL NO. 4
AMENDMENT TO THE 1991
LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders are being asked to approve the
adoption of an amendment to the Company's 1991 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
(the "1991 Plan"), adopted by the Board on July 12, 1999, which increases the
number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by a total of 70,000,000
shares of Common Stock.
Required Vote
Approval of the adoption of the amendment to the 1991 Plan requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock
present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions
and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining
whether a quorum is present, and broker non-votes will not be treated as
entitled to vote on this matter at the Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for approval of
the amendment to the 1991 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan.
Plan Activity
As of August 20, 1999, options to purchase an aggregate of 58,636,250 shares
of Common Stock issued under the 1991 Plan had been exercised, and options to
purchase 153,732,077 shares were outstanding. Without taking into account the
proposed amendment to the 1991 Plan, 70,756,673 shares remained available for
future grants as of August 20, 1999.
The table under the caption "Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year" provides
information with respect to the grant of options under the 1991 Plan to the
Chief Executive Officer and the next four most highly compensated executive
officers during fiscal year 1999. The following table sets forth additional
information with respect to options granted under the 1991 Plan during fiscal
year 1999 to certain groups:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted Average Options
Identity of Group Exercise Price Granted
----------------- ---------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
All executive officers as a group (11
persons)..................................... $18.47 7,750,000
Non-executive officer employees as a group
(approximately 6,236 persons)................ $17.71 33,967,758
</TABLE>
Description of the 1991 Plan and Option Terms
The following is a summary of the principal provisions of the 1991 Plan, but
it is not intended to be a complete description of all of the terms and
provisions of the 1991 Plan. A copy of the 1991 Plan will be furnished to any
stockholder upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the
principal executive offices of the Company in Redwood City, California.
History. The 1991 Plan was adopted by the Company's Board of Directors on
July 31, 1991 and was approved by the Company's stockholders on October 14,
1991 with a total of 50,625,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock reserved
for issuance thereunder. The 1991 Plan was amended by the Board of Directors
to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by
40,500,000 on July 19, 1993, and such amendment was approved by the
stockholders on October 11, 1993. The 1991 Plan was amended by the
Compensation Committee to limit the number of options that can be granted to
any individual during any year to 10,125,000, and such amendment was approved
by the stockholders on October 10, 1994. The 1991 Plan was amended by the
Board of Directors to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance
thereunder by 40,500,000 on July 17, 1995, and such amendment was approved by
the stockholders on October 9, 1995. The
17
<PAGE>
1991 Plan was amended by the Board of Directors to increase the number of
shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 76,500,000 on July 15, 1996, and
such amendment was approved by the stockholders on October 14, 1996. The 1991
Plan was amended by the Board of Directors to increase the number of shares
reserved for issuance thereunder by 75,000,000 on July 13, 1998, and such
amendment was approved by the stockholders on October 18, 1998.
On December 9, 1996, the Company amended the 1991 Plan to provide for the
assumption of options granted under the Datalogix International Inc.
("Datalogix") Amended and Restated 1992 Incentive Stock Plan and 1986 Key
Employees' Stock Option Plan and on July 14, 1997, the Company amended the
1991 Plan to provide for the assumption of options granted by Treasury
Services Corporation ("TSC") in connection with the acquisition of each of
Datalogix and TSC. With respect to these assumed options, if there are
conflicts between the terms of the Datalogix or TSC plans and the 1991 Plan,
then the terms of the Datalogix or TSC plan, as appropriate, shall govern. If
any provision of the 1991 Plan may be deemed to provide an additional benefit
to the holder of these assumed options, then such provision shall not apply
with respect to those assumed options.
Purpose. The purpose of the 1991 Plan is to provide additional compensation
and incentive to eligible employees, officers, directors, advisors and
consultants whose present and potential contributions are important to the
continued success of the Company, to afford such persons an opportunity to
acquire a proprietary interest in the Company and to enable the Company to
continue to enlist and retain the best available talent for the successful
conduct of its business.
Administration. The 1991 Plan is currently administered by the Compensation
Committee. Subject to the terms of the 1991 Plan, the Compensation Committee
determines the persons who are to receive awards, the number of shares subject
to each award, the terms and conditions of such awards and the dates of
grants. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to construe and
interpret any of the provisions of the 1991 Plan or any options granted
thereunder. Such interpretations are binding on the Company and on the
participants.
Eligibility. All officers, directors (who are also employees or consultants
of the Company), employees, advisors and consultants of the Company (or any
subsidiary or affiliate of the Company) are eligible to receive awards under
the 1991 Plan. The Company may also grant options under the 1991 Plan in
connection with its assumption or replacement of options issued by another
company if the optionee would have been eligible to receive an option under
the 1991 Plan had the other company applied the rules of the 1991 Plan in
granting such option. As of August 20, 1999, approximately 43,000 full-time
employees were eligible to receive options under the 1991 Plan, except those
who are not eligible due to local laws.
Option Awards. Both incentive stock options ("ISOs"), as defined in Section
422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), and nonqualified stock
options ("NQSOs"), may be granted under the 1991 Plan. The Compensation
Committee determines whether an option granted under the 1991 Plan will be an
ISO or a NQSO. The 1991 Plan limits the aggregate fair market value
(determined as of the time the option is granted) of the shares with respect
to which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by the optionee during any
calendar year to not more than $100,000. There is no similar limit on NQSOs
granted under the 1991 Plan. The Company currently grants only NQSOs.
Other Awards. In addition to stock options, certain other awards may be
granted under the 1991 Plan, although no such rights or awards have been
granted to date under the 1991 Plan. The Compensation Committee may grant
Stock Appreciation Rights ("SAR"), together with related options, entitling
the holder upon exercise to receive an amount in any combination of cash or
Common Stock (as determined by the Compensation Committee) equal in value to
the excess of the fair market value of the shares covered by such SAR on the
date of exercise over the aggregate exercise price of the related option for
such shares. The Compensation Committee may also grant rights to purchase
stock under such terms and conditions as it may determine. In addition, the
Compensation Committee may grant stock bonus awards payable in cash or Common
Stock based upon reasonable performance criteria the Compensation Committee
deems appropriate.
18
<PAGE>
Performance-Based Compensation Limits. No employee shall be granted in any
fiscal year of the Company options and SARs to acquire in the aggregate more
than 10,125,000 shares of Common Stock. The foregoing limitation, which shall
adjust proportionately in connection with any change in the Company's
capitalization, is intended to satisfy the requirements applicable to options
and SARs intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the
meaning of Code Section 162(m). In the event that the Compensation Committee
determines that such limitation is not required to qualify options and SARs as
performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee may modify or
eliminate such limitation.
Terms of the Options. Each option granted pursuant to the 1991 Plan is
evidenced by a stock option grant (the "Grant") issued by the Company. An
exercise notice and agreement (the "Exercise Notice") is to be completed by
the optionee at the time an option is exercised. The Company does not receive
any consideration from an optionee at the time an option is granted. The forms
of the Grant and the Exercise Notice may be amended by the Compensation
Committee from time to time, subject to the terms of the 1991 Plan.
Options may be granted under the 1991 Plan until July 30, 2001.
Subject to the provisions of the 1991 Plan, the Compensation Committee may
determine the vesting schedule of each option and other terms and conditions
of exercisability. Options granted under the 1991 Plan typically vest in four
equal annual installments starting from the date of grant, although vesting of
an option may be accelerated by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee also has the discretion to modify, extend or renew outstanding
awards and to issue new awards in exchange for surrender of outstanding
awards. The Compensation Committee also may cause the Company to purchase for
cash or shares of Common Stock any option issued under the 1991 Plan.
Generally, ISOs and NQSOs granted under the 1991 Plan must be exercised
within ten years of the option grant date. Any ISO granted to a person owning
10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the
Company or of any subsidiary of the Company (a "Ten Percent Stockholder") must
be exercised within five years of the option grant date.
The Compensation Committee determines the exercise price of each option
granted, which is set forth in the Grant. Under the 1991 Plan, the exercise
price of a NQSO granted to an employee may be less than the fair market value
per share of the Company's Common Stock on the date the option is granted. In
the case of an ISO, or in the case of an NQSO granted to a person other than
an employee, the price shall be no less than 100% of the fair market value of
a share of Common Stock at the time such option is granted, subject to certain
conditions set forth in the 1991 Plan; provided that, in the case of an ISO
granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder, the price shall be no less than 110% of
the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the option is granted.
Options may be granted with exercise prices other than as described above in
connection with the Company's assumption or replacement of options issued by
another company. The exercise price of options granted under the 1991 Plan,
including all applicable withholding taxes, must be paid: (1) in cash; (2) by
surrender of shares of the Company's Common Stock owned by the optionee for at
least six months (or, in the case of payment of withholding taxes, by having
the Company withhold from the shares to be issued upon exercise) having a fair
market value on the date of surrender equal to the exercise price of the
option (or the amount of the withholding obligation); (3) where permitted by
applicable law and approved by the Compensation Committee, in its sole
discretion, by tender of a promissory note; (4) by cancellation of
indebtedness of the Company to the optionee; (5) by waiver of compensation due
to or accrued by the optionee for services rendered; (6) by a same-day sale
commitment from the optionee and a qualified broker; (7) by a margin
commitment from the optionee and a qualified broker; or (8) by any combination
of the foregoing, where approved by the Compensation Committee in its sole
discretion.
Deferrals. The Compensation Committee may also permit participants to elect
to defer receipt of benefits under the 1991 Plan or make automatic deferrals.
The Committee may also provide and determine the amount of any deemed earnings
for amounts deferred under the 1991 Plan.
19
<PAGE>
Nontransferability and Termination of Options. Options granted under the
1991 Plan may not be transferred by the optionee other than by will or by the
laws of descent and distribution, except that the Compensation Committee may
in its discretion grant NQSOs with limited transferability rights. During the
lifetime of the optionee, an option may be exercised only by the optionee or
his or her legal representative.
If an optionee's employment or other association with the Company or a
subsidiary is terminated for any reason other than death or disability, any
outstanding option, to the extent (and only to the extent) that it was
exercisable on the date of such termination, must be exercised by the optionee
by the earlier of three months following such termination or the expiration
date of the option. If termination is on account of disability, any
outstanding option, to the extent exercisable on the termination date, must be
exercised by the earlier of 12 months following such date or the expiration
date of the option. If termination is on account of the Participant's death,
any outstanding option must be exercised, to the extent the option would have
been exercisable had the Participant continued his or her relationship with
the Company for a period of time extending through an additional two vesting
dates following the date of death, by the earlier of 12 months following the
date of death or the expiration date of the option.
Capital Changes. If the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock of the
Company is changed by a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split,
combination, reclassification or similar change in the capital structure of
the Company without consideration, the number of shares of Common Stock
available for option grants under the 1991 Plan, the number of shares and the
exercise price per share for each outstanding option and the annual limitation
noted above will be proportionately adjusted, subject to any required action
by the Board or stockholders of the Company.
In general, in the event of a merger or consolidation in which the Company
is not the surviving corporation, or the sale of all or substantially all of
the assets of the Company, the vesting of all awards granted pursuant to the
1991 Plan will accelerate and the awards will become exercisable in full prior
to the consummation of such event (and such awards shall then terminate), at
such times and on such conditions as the Compensation Committee determines,
unless the successor corporation assumes the outstanding awards or substitutes
substantially equivalent awards. In addition, if an employee's employment or
other association with the Company's successor is terminated without cause
within 12 months after consummation of a merger, consolidation or sale of
assets, awards under the 1991 Plan will accelerate and become immediately and
fully exercisable upon such termination.
Notwithstanding the above, if 50% or more of the outstanding voting
securities of the Company becomes beneficially owned (as defined in Rule 13d-3
promulgated by the SEC) by a person (as defined in Section 2 (2) of the
Securities Act of 1933 and in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934) in a transaction or series of transactions expressly disapproved by
the Board, then all outstanding awards shall become immediately exercisable
with no further act or action required by the Board or the Committee as
provided in the 1991 Plan.
Amendment and Termination. The Committee may amend or terminate the 1991
Plan at any time and in any respect, except that the Committee cannot, without
the approval of the stockholders of the Company, amend the 1991 Plan in any
manner that requires stockholder approval pursuant to the Code or the
regulations thereunder or pursuant to Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act. No
amendment of the 1991 Plan may adversely affect any outstanding option or
unexercised portion thereof without the optionee's written consent. Subject to
the specific terms of the 1991 Plan, the Committee may accelerate any award or
option, reduce any applicable exercise price or waive any conditions or
restrictions pursuant to such award or option at any time.
If an option granted pursuant to the 1991 Plan expires or terminates for any
reason without being exercised in whole or in part, the shares released from
such option or award will again become available for grant and purchase under
the 1991 Plan.
Certain United States Federal Income Tax Information
General. The following is a general summary as of the date of this Proxy
Statement of the United States federal income tax consequences associated with
participation in the 1991 Plan. The federal tax laws may change and the
federal, state and local tax consequences for any participant will depend upon
his or her individual
20
<PAGE>
circumstances. This information may not be applicable to employees of foreign
subsidiaries or to participants who are not residents of the United States.
All participants have been and are encouraged to seek the advice of a
qualified tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of participation in the
1991 Plan. Any tax effects that accrue to foreign employees as a result of
participation in the 1991 Plan will be subject to the tax laws of the
countries in which such employees reside.
Tax Treatment of the Optionee
Nonqualified Stock Options. An optionee will not recognize any taxable
income at the time a NQSO is granted. However, upon exercise of a NQSO the
optionee will include in income as compensation an amount equal to the
difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise
(in most cases) and the optionee's purchase price. The included amount will be
treated as ordinary income and reported on an employee's W-2 form, or in the
case of a non-employee, on a 1099 form and will be subject to income tax and
FICA withholding by the Company (either by payment in cash or withholding out
of the optionee's salary) if the optionee is an employee. Upon the sale of the
shares by the optionee, any subsequent appreciation or depreciation in the
value of the shares will be treated as short term or long term capital gain or
loss depending upon whether or not the optionee held the shares for more than
one year following exercise of the NQSO.
Incentive Stock Options. The optionee will recognize no income upon grant of
an ISO and incur no tax on its exercise unless the optionee is subject to the
alternative minimum tax described below. If the optionee holds the stock
acquired upon exercise of an ISO (the "ISO Shares") for more than one year
after the date the option was exercised and for more than two years after the
date the option was granted, the optionee generally will realize long-term
capital gain or loss (rather than ordinary income or loss) upon disposition of
the ISO Shares. This gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the
amount realized upon such disposition and the amount paid for the ISO Shares.
If the optionee disposes of ISO Shares prior to the expiration of either of
the above required holding periods (a "disqualifying disposition"), the gain
realized upon such disposition, up to the difference between the fair market
value of the ISO Shares on the date of exercise and the option exercise price,
will be treated as ordinary income and reported on the employee's W-2 form.
Income tax withholding on this income is optional. Any additional gain or loss
will be long-term or short term capital gain or loss, depending upon whether
or not the ISO Shares were held for more than one year following the date of
exercise by the optionee. A disposition of ISO Shares for this purpose
includes not only a sale or exchange, but also a gift or other transfer of
legal title (with certain exceptions). Long-term capital gain is taxed at a
maximum federal income tax rate of 20% rather than the 39.6% maximum rate
applicable to other income.
Alternative Minimum Tax. Generally, the difference between the fair market
value of stock purchased by exercise of an ISO (generally measured as of the
date of exercise) and the amount paid for that stock upon exercise of the ISO
is an adjustment to income for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. An
alternative minimum tax adjustment applies unless a disqualifying disposition
of the ISO Shares occurs in the same calendar year as exercise of the ISO. The
alternative minimum tax (imposed to the extent it exceeds the taxpayer's
regular tax) is 26% of an individual taxpayer's alternative minimum taxable
income for alternative minimum taxable income up to $175,000 and 28%
thereafter. Alternative minimum taxable income is determined by adjusting
regular taxable income for certain items, increasing that income by certain
tax preference items and reducing this amount by the applicable exemption
amount ($45,000 in the case of a joint return, subject to reduction under
certain circumstances).
Tax Treatment of the Company. The Company will be entitled to a deduction in
connection with the exercise of a NQSO by a domestic optionee to the extent
that the optionee recognizes ordinary income provided that the deduction is
not disallowed under the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code. The Company
will be entitled to a deduction in connection with the disposition of ISO
Shares only to the extent that the optionee recognizes ordinary income on a
disqualifying disposition of the ISO Shares and will not be entitled to any
deduction upon exercise of an ISO.
ERISA. The Company believes that the 1991 Plan is not subject to any of the
provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
21
<PAGE>
PROPOSAL NO. 5
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Company has engaged Arthur Andersen LLP as its principal independent
public accountants to perform the audit of the Company's financial statements
for fiscal year 2000. Arthur Andersen LLP has audited the Company's financial
statements for its last twelve fiscal years. The Board of Directors expects
that representatives of Arthur Andersen LLP will be present at the Annual
Meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement at the meeting if
they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
Required Vote
The ratification of the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock
present or represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions
and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining
whether a quorum is present, and broker non-votes will not be treated as
entitled to vote on this matter at the Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for the
ratification of the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholder proposals for inclusion in the Company's Proxy Statement and
form of proxy relating to the Company's 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
must be received by May 10, 2000. If the Company is not notified of a
stockholder proposal by July 24, 2000, then the management proxies may have
the discretion to vote against such stockholder proposal, even though such
proposal is not discussed in the proxy statement. Stockholder proposals should
be addressed to Daniel Cooperman, Senior Vice President, General Counsel &
Secretary, Oracle Corporation, Mailstop 5op7, Redwood City, California 94065.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Board of Directors does not presently intend to bring any other business
before the meeting, and, so far as is known to the Board of Directors, no
matters are to be brought before the meeting except as specified in the Notice
of Annual Meeting. As to any business that may properly come before the
meeting, however, it is intended that proxies, in the form enclosed, will be
voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting
such proxies.
VOTING VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE
Stockholders voting via the Internet should understand that there may be
costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from Internet
access providers and telephone companies, that must be borne by the
stockholder.
Shares Registered Directly in the Name of the Stockholder
Stockholders with shares registered directly with Boston Equiserve, the
Company's transfer agent, may vote telephonically by calling Boston Equiserve
at (877) 779-8683 or you may vote via the Internet at the following address on
the World Wide Web:
www.eproxyvote.com/orcl/
22
<PAGE>
and follow the instructions on your screen.
Shares Registered in the Name of a Brokerage Firm or Bank
A number of brokerage firms and banks are participating in a program
provided through ADP Investor Communication Services that offers telephone and
Internet voting options. This program is different from the program provided
by Boston Equiserve for shares registered in the name of the stockholder. If
your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm or bank participating
in the ADP program, you may vote those shares telephonically by calling the
telephone number referenced on your voting form or you may vote via the
Internet at the following address on the World Wide Web:
www.proxyvote.com
and follow the instructions on your screen.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Daniel Cooperman
DANIEL COOPERMAN
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
& Secretary
All stockholders are urged to complete, sign, date and return the
accompanying proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or to vote
electronically via the Internet or telephone. Thank you for your prompt
attention to this matter.
23
<PAGE>
[RECYCLED PAPER LOGO]
Printed on Recycled Paper
4290-PS99 C13488-01
<PAGE>
[proxy card--front]
ORACLE CORPORATION
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OCTOBER 18, 1999
The undersigned hereby appoints LAWRENCE J. ELLISON, RAYMOND J. LANE and
JEFFREY O. HENLEY, or any of them, each with power of substitution, as proxies
to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ORACLE
CORPORATION, to be held on Monday, October 18, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., in the
Oracle Corporation Conference Center, 350 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City,
California, and any adjournment thereof, and to vote the number of shares the
undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present on the following
matters set forth on the reverse side.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IN THE ABSENCE OF DIRECTION, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED
FOR THE NINE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION, TO APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR
2000 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN, TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE 1991 LONG-TERM
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ARTHUR
ANDERSEN LLP.
<PAGE>
[proxy card--back]
(Continued from other side)
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
FOR all nominees listed below (except as marked to the contrary
below):
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed below:
Nominees: Lawrence J. Ellison, Donald L. Lucas, Michael J. Boskin,
Raymond J. Lane, Jeffrey O. Henley, Jack F. Kemp, Jeffrey Berg, Richard
McGinn and Kay Koplovitz.
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write
that nominee's name on the space provided below)
- -------------------------
2. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF THE COMPANY'S FISCAL YEAR 2000
EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN
3. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION
[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN
4. PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S 1991 LONG-TERM EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN
5. PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP AS INDEPENDENT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING MAY 31,
2000
[_] FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN
6. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other
business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any
adjournment or continuation thereof.
Please sign exactly as the name or names appear on stock certificate (as
indicated hereon). If the shares are issued in the names of two or more
persons, all such persons should sign the proxy. A proxy executed by a
corporation should be signed in its name by its authorized officers.
Executors, administrators, trustees, and partners should indicate their
positions when signing.
Dated: , 1999
-----------------------------------
Signatures
STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO DATE, MARK, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS PROXY IN THE
ENVELOPE PROVIDED, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED WITHIN THE UNITED
STATES.
